DEFM14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
HLTH CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407
|
|
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
|
To the Stockholders of HLTH
Corporation and WebMD Health Corp.:
On June 17, 2009, HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp.
entered into an agreement and plan of merger. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus describes the merger contemplated by that
agreement, including the reasons the merger was proposed, the
negotiation process that led to the merger and other background
information. We are sending you this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and related materials in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by the boards of directors of WebMD
and HLTH for use at their Annual Meetings of Stockholders to be
held on October 23, 2009. At the Annual Meetings, the
stockholders of WebMD and HLTH will each be asked to consider
and vote on a proposal to approve the merger of HLTH and WebMD,
as well as the other proposals to be considered at the Annual
Meetings. These proposals are discussed in greater detail in the
remainder of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We urge
you to carefully read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and
the documents incorporated by reference into it. In particular,
see Risk Factors beginning on page 28.
If the merger is approved by stockholders of HLTH and WebMD and
the other conditions specified in the merger agreement are met:
|
|
|
|
|
HLTH will merge into WebMD, with WebMD continuing as the
surviving company and HLTH will cease to exist as a separate
entity;
|
|
|
|
each outstanding share of HLTH Common Stock will be converted
into 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
the WebMD Class B Common Stock held by HLTH will be
canceled; and
|
|
|
|
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will continue to own
their existing shares, which will not be affected by the merger,
except that such shares will no longer be referred to as
Class A and except as otherwise described in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
Because of HLTHs ownership of a controlling interest in
WebMD, the WebMD Board of Directors formed a special committee
to consider possible transactions between the companies. Each of
the members of the special committee is an independent director
and none of its members serves as a director of HLTH. The
special committee retained its own financial and legal advisors
and, with the assistance of those advisors, negotiated the terms
and conditions of the merger with HLTH. After this negotiation,
and upon receipt of the opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co.
Inc., an independent investment banking firm retained by the
special committee, that the merger consideration to be received
by holders of HLTH Common Stock is fair, from a financial point
of view, to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock
(other than HLTH and the officers and directors of HLTH, WebMD
and their respective affiliates), the special committee
unanimously recommended to the WebMD Board of Directors that the
merger be approved and that the WebMD board recommend that
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote in favor of the
merger. Based on the recommendation of the special committee,
the WebMD Board of Directors approved the merger and recommends
that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote
FOR the proposal to approve the merger at the WebMD
Annual Meeting.
The HLTH Board of Directors believes that the merger is fair to
and in the best interests of the stockholders of HLTH and
recommends that HLTHs stockholders vote FOR
the proposal to approve the merger at the HLTH Annual Meeting.
In the merger agreement, HLTH has agreed to vote all of the
shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock that it holds in favor
of approving the merger. Since HLTH controls approximately 96%
of the voting power of all the outstanding WebMD Common Stock,
it can cause the merger to be approved by WebMD without the vote
of any other stockholder. However, HLTH and WebMD cannot
complete the merger unless a majority of the outstanding shares
of HLTH Common Stock approves it.
All HLTH and WebMD stockholders are cordially invited to attend
their companys Annual Meeting in person. However, to
ensure your representation at the applicable Annual Meeting, you
are urged to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy
card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope as promptly as
possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin J. Wygod
Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer,
HLTH Corporation
|
|
Wayne T. Gattinella
Chief Executive Officer and President,
WebMD Health Corp.
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued in connection with the merger, approved
or disapproved of the transaction, passed upon the merits or
fairness of the transaction or determined if this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is adequate, accurate or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated
September 14, 2009 and is first being mailed to
stockholders on or about September 18, 2009.
SOURCES
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus includes information
also set forth in documents filed by WebMD and HLTH with the
SEC, and those documents include information about each company
that is not included in or delivered with this document. This
joint proxy statement/prospectus also incorporates by reference
important business and financial information about WebMD and
HLTH from documents filed by WebMD and HLTH with the SEC that
are not included in or delivered with this document. You can
obtain any of those documents filed with the SEC from WebMD or
HLTH, as the case may be, or through the SEC at the SECs
web site. The address of that site is
http://www.sec.gov.
Stockholders of WebMD or HLTH may obtain documents filed with
the SEC or documents incorporated by reference in this document,
when available, free of cost, by directing a request to the
appropriate company at:
|
|
|
HLTH Corporation
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone Number:
(201) 414-2002
|
|
WebMD Health Corp.
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone Number: (212) 624-3817
|
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least five business days
before the date of the Annual Meetings. This means you must
request this information no later than September 18, 2009.
WebMD or HLTH, as the case may be, will mail properly requested
documents to requesting stockholders by first class mail, or
another equally prompt means, within one business day after
receipt of such requests.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you
with information that is different from that contained in, or
incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is
dated September 14, 2009. You should not assume that the
information contained in, or incorporated by reference into,
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date
other than that date, except to the extent that such information
is contained in an additional document filed with the SEC under
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, between
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date
of the HLTH and WebMD annual meetings and is incorporated by
reference herein. Neither the mailing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to HLTH or WebMD stockholders nor the
issuance by WebMD of WebMD Common Stock in connection with the
merger will create any implication to the contrary.
This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a
solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the
solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any
person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or
solicitation in such jurisdiction. Information contained in this
document regarding HLTH has been provided by HLTH and
information contained in this document regarding WebMD has been
provided by WebMD.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 255.
WEBMD
HEALTH CORP.
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD OCTOBER 23,
2009
To the Stockholders of WebMD Health Corp.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
WebMD Health Corp. will be held at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time,
on October 23, 2009, at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery
Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004, for the
following purposes:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the
agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 17, 2009,
between HLTH Corporation and WebMD, and to approve the
transactions contemplated by that agreement, including the
merger.
2. To elect three Class I directors, each to serve a
three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or
his earlier resignation or removal.
3. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify and approve
an amendment to WebMDs Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common
Stock issuable under that Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to a
total of 15,600,000 shares.
4. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm to serve as WebMDs
independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
5. To consider and transact such other business as may
properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
September 8, 2009 will be entitled to vote at this meeting.
The stock transfer books will not be closed.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual
Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the
Annual Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and return
the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope
as promptly as possible.
By Order of the Board of Directors
of WebMD Health Corp.
Douglas W. Wamsley
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
New York, New York
September 14, 2009
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING,
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY.
HLTH
CORPORATION
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey
07407-1361
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD OCTOBER 23,
2009
To the Stockholders of HLTH Corporation:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
HLTH Corporation will be held at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time,
on October 23, 2009, at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery
Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004, for the
following purposes:
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the
agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 17, 2009,
between WebMD Health Corp. and HLTH, and to approve the
transactions contemplated by that agreement, including the
merger.
2. To elect three Class II directors, each to serve a
three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or
his earlier resignation or removal.
3. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm to serve as HLTHs
independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009, in the event that the merger is not completed.
4. To consider and transact such other business as may
properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
September 8, 2009 will be entitled to vote at this meeting.
The stock transfer books will not be closed.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual
Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the
Annual Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and return
the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope
as promptly as possible.
By Order of the Board of Directors
of HLTH Corporation
Charles A. Mele
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Elmwood Park, New Jersey
September 14, 2009
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING,
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
iii
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains both historical
and forward-looking statements. All statements, other than
statements of historical fact, are or may be, forward-looking
statements. For example, the following types of statements are,
or may be, forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or forecasts
of the financial or operational performance of HLTH, WebMD or
the combined company or of the value of assets or liabilities of
HLTH, WebMD or the combined company;
|
|
|
|
HLTHs, WebMDs or the combined companys
objectives, plans or goals; and
|
|
|
|
conditions or events following the completion of the proposed
merger of HLTH and WebMD.
|
These forward-looking statements reflect managements
current expectations concerning future results and events and
can generally be identified by the use of expressions such as
may, will, should,
could, would, likely,
predict, potential,
continue, future, estimate,
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, foresee, and
other similar words or phrases, as well as statements in the
future tense.
Examples of forward-looking statements in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus include, but are not limited to, statements
regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
expected benefits from the merger;
|
|
|
|
HLTHs and WebMDs ability to satisfy the conditions
and terms of the merger, and to execute the merger in the
estimated timeframe, if at all;
|
|
|
|
expected governance of WebMD upon completion of the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
the anticipated tax consequences of the merger.
|
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or
achievements to be different from any future results,
performance and achievements expressed or implied by these
statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ
materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking
statements include, among others, those disclosed in the section
entitled Risk Factors and in other reports filed by
WebMD and HLTH with the SEC and incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The forward-looking statements included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are made only as of the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Except as required by applicable law
or regulation, neither WebMD nor HLTH undertake any obligation
to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent
events or circumstances.
2008
ANNUAL REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
Annexes B-1 through B-4 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
constitute portions of the 2008 Annual Report required to be
distributed with this joint proxy statement/prospectus to
stockholders of HLTH. Annexes C-1 through C-5 of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus constitute portions of the 2008
Annual Report required to be distributed with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to stockholders of WebMD. For 2008, the
companies will not be distributing stand-alone Annual Report
documents. The Annexes, together with other information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, contain all
of the information that HLTH and WebMD would have included in
their respective Annual Reports, but in a format that they
believe is more useful to stockholders of both HLTH and WebMD in
connection with this years Annual Meetings.
v
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS
The
Annual Meetings of Stockholders
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where are the Annual Meetings of Stockholders? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Both the HLTH Annual Meeting and the WebMD Annual Meeting will
take place on October 23, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., at The
Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York,
New York 10004. |
* * * * *
The
Merger
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will HLTH stockholders receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, each outstanding share of HLTH
Common Stock will be converted into 0.4444 shares of WebMD
Common Stock. |
|
|
|
WebMD will not issue any fractional shares of WebMD Common Stock
in exchange for shares of HLTH Common Stock. Instead, each
holder of a fractional share interest will be paid an amount in
cash (without interest) equal to the fractional share interest
multiplied by the closing price of a share of WebMD Class A
Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the last
trading day immediately preceding the effective time of the
merger. For more information on the treatment of fractional
shares, see The Merger Agreement Effect on
Capital Stock; Merger Consideration; Exchange of
Certificates Exchange of Certificates. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to shares of WebMD Common Stock in the
merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, the shares of WebMD Class B
Common Stock, all of which are held by HLTH, will be canceled.
Holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will continue to own
their existing shares, which will not be converted or cancelled
in the merger. However, since there will no longer be any WebMD
Class B Common Stock outstanding following the effective
time of the merger, the merger agreement provides for the
certificate of incorporation of WebMD to be amended at the time
of the merger to reflect there being only one class of WebMD
Common Stock outstanding, all shares of which will have the same
rights, and it will no longer be referred to as
Class A after the merger. Based on
9.7 million shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock and
104.0 million shares of HLTH Common Stock outstanding as of
August 31, 2009, there would be approximately
55.9 million shares of WebMD Common Stock outstanding on a
pro forma basis, giving effect to the merger as of that date.
The only further changes being made to WebMDs certificate
of incorporation merely give effect, at the time of the merger,
to provisions of the existing certificate of incorporation that
would automatically have become effective whenever HLTH ceased
to own a majority of the voting power of WebMDs
outstanding Common Stock. For a description of the changes to be
made to the certificate of incorporation of WebMD in connection
with the merger, see Description of WebMD Capital
Stock Amendments to Amended WebMD Charter and
Amended and Restated By-laws. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to HLTH in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Upon effectiveness of the merger, the separate corporate
existence of HLTH will cease and WebMD will continue as the
surviving company in the merger and will succeed to and assume
all the rights and obligations of HLTH. |
|
Q: |
|
Why was the merger proposed? |
|
A: |
|
The key goals for the merger include allowing HLTHs
stockholders to participate directly in the ownership of WebMD,
while eliminating HLTHs controlling interest in WebMD and
the inefficiencies associated with having two separate public
companies, increasing the ability of WebMD to raise capital and
to obtain financing, and enhancing the liquidity of WebMD Common
Stock by significantly increasing the public float. The boards
of directors of HLTH and WebMD both believe that, as a result of
the negotiations between HLTH and a special committee of the
WebMD Board of Directors, which we refer to |
1
|
|
|
|
|
as the WebMD Special Committee, the merger agreement provides
for a transaction that meets these goals and is fair to the
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. The Board of
Directors of HLTH also believes that the terms of the merger are
fair to the holders of HLTH Common Stock. A detailed discussion
of the background of, and reasons for, the merger are described
in The Merger Background of the Merger,
The Merger HLTHs Purposes and Reasons
for the Merger and The Merger
WebMDs Purposes and Reasons for the Merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Are there risks I should consider in deciding whether to vote
for the merger? |
|
A. |
|
Yes. A description of some of the risks that should be
considered in connection with the merger are included in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus under the heading Risk
Factors. |
|
Q: |
|
Why did the WebMD Board of Directors appoint a Special
Committee to negotiate with HLTH? |
|
A: |
|
Because of HLTHs ownership of a controlling interest in
WebMD, the Board of Directors of WebMD formed the WebMD Special
Committee to consider and negotiate a possible transaction
between the two companies to be proposed by HLTH. Each of the
members of the WebMD Special Committee is an independent
director and none of its members serves as a director of HLTH.
The WebMD Special Committee retained its own financial and legal
advisors and, with the assistance of those advisors, negotiated
the terms and conditions of the merger with HLTH. |
|
Q: |
|
Do the boards of directors of HLTH and WebMD recommend voting
FOR the proposals to adopt the merger agreement and
approve the merger at the Annual Meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Based on the recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee,
taking into consideration the fairness opinion of the WebMD
Special Committees financial advisor, a copy of which is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex F, the Board of Directors of WebMD approved the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and
declared the merger agreement advisable, and recommends that
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote FOR
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the
WebMD Annual Meeting. |
|
|
|
Additionally, taking into consideration the fairness opinion of
its financial advisor, a copy of which is attached to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus as Annex E, the Board of
Directors of HLTH also approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and declared the merger
agreement advisable, and recommends that HLTH stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and
approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the
merger, at the HLTH Annual Meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated November 7, 2007
between HLTH and Raymond James, HLTH paid Raymond James a fee of
$100,000 upon delivery of its fairness opinion to the HLTH Board
of Directors in connection with the merger. The engagement
letter also provides that Raymond James will be paid a
$1,000,000 fee if the merger is completed. HLTH also previously
paid a retainer fee of $50,000 and an opinion fee of $500,000 to
Raymond James in connection with the terminated 2008 merger
transaction between HLTH and WebMD. HLTH negotiated this fee
structure so that it would not have to pay the additional
$1,000,000 fee if the merger were not consummated. At the time
HLTHs Board of Directors requested delivery of a fairness
opinion from Raymond James in connection with the merger,
HLTHs Board understood the potential incentives to issue a
fairness opinion created by the applicable fee structure.
However, HLTHs Board believed that Raymond James would
apply appropriate professional judgment in connection with its
delivery of such opinion, regardless of the fee structure. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do HLTHs and WebMDs directors and executive
officers intend to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the merger at the Annual Meetings? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
As of September 8, 2009, which is the record date for both
the HLTH and WebMD Annual Meetings, the directors and executive
officers of HLTH held and are entitled to vote, in the
aggregate, shares of HLTH Common Stock representing
approximately 8.4% of the outstanding shares, and the directors
and executive officers of WebMD held and are entitled to vote,
in the aggregate, shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock
representing approximately 0.4% of the aggregate voting power of
the outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock. HLTH and WebMD
each believe that its directors and executive officers intend to
vote all of their |
2
|
|
|
|
|
shares of HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Class A Common Stock
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and
approve the merger at the respective Annual Meetings. In
addition, HLTH has agreed in the merger agreement to vote the
WebMD Class B Common Stock it owns, which represents
approximately 96% of the combined voting power of all WebMD
Common Stock, in favor of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If HLTH and WebMD receive the required stockholder approvals at
their respective Annual Meetings to be held on October 23,
2009, they expect to complete the merger shortly after those
meetings. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will the combined companys business be
different? |
|
A: |
|
The combined company will consist of WebMDs business and
may also include HLTHs Porex business, which HLTH is
currently in the process of divesting. HLTH currently has no
operating businesses other than Porex and WebMD. |
|
Q: |
|
What will be the composition of the Board of Directors of
WebMD and HLTH following the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Immediately following the merger, the directors of HLTH who are
not currently directors of WebMD will become directors of WebMD
and, together with WebMDs existing directors, those
directors will constitute the Board of Directors of the
surviving corporation until their respective successors are duly
elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or
removal. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to HLTH stock options and shares of HLTH
restricted stock? |
|
A. |
|
In addition to providing for the merger consideration to be paid
to HLTH stockholders, the Merger Agreement contains provisions
for the treatment of HLTH stock options and HLTH restricted
stock. At the time of the merger, HLTH stock options and shares
of HLTH restricted stock will be treated as follows: |
|
|
|
Stock Options: All outstanding
stock options of HLTH will be assumed by WebMD without any
further action on the part of HLTH or the option holders. These
assumed options will become options to acquire WebMD Common
Stock. The new exercise price and number of shares of WebMD
Common Stock subject to the assumed options will be determined
based on the exchange ratio. For a more detailed description,
see The Merger Interests of Certain Persons in
the Merger Treatment of Grants Under HLTH and WebMD
Equity Plans HLTH Stock Options.
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: Each outstanding
share of restricted stock of HLTH will be converted into 0.4444
shares of restricted WebMD Common Stock. For a more detailed
description, see The Merger Interests of
Certain Persons in the Merger Treatment of Grants
Under HLTH and WebMD Equity Plans HLTH Restricted
Stock Awards.
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
merger? |
|
A: |
|
The merger is intended to constitute a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, so that a U.S.
holder (as defined in The Merger Material U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger) whose
shares of HLTH Common Stock are exchanged in the merger solely
for shares of WebMD Common Stock will not recognize gain or
loss, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional
shares of WebMD Common Stock. The merger is conditioned on the
receipt of legal opinions that for U.S. federal income tax
purposes the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of
WebMD and HLTH will be a party to the reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. |
|
|
|
For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the merger, see The Merger
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger. Tax matters are complicated and the consequences
of the merger to you will depend on your particular facts and
circumstances. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor as
to the specific tax consequences of the merger to you, including
the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and
other tax laws. |
3
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What stockholder vote is required to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the merger at the Annual Meetings? |
|
A: |
|
To be approved at the HLTH Annual Meeting, the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated
by that agreement, including the merger, must receive the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
HLTH Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. |
|
|
|
To be approved at the WebMD Annual Meeting, the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger, must receive the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting
power of the outstanding WebMD Common Stock entitled to vote
thereon. The terms of the merger agreement do not require that
at least a majority of the holders of WebMD Common Stock other
than HLTH and the officers and directors of HLTH, WebMD and
their respective affiliates (who we refer to as the unaffiliated
WebMD stockholders) approve the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the merger. HLTH has agreed, in the
merger agreement, to vote in favor of that proposal at the WebMD
Annual Meeting. HLTHs ownership of all of the outstanding
shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock represents
approximately 96% of the combined voting power of the two
classes of WebMD Common Stock. As a result, HLTH is able, acting
alone, to cause the approval of the proposal regarding the
merger at the WebMD Annual Meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I do not vote my HLTH shares or WebMD shares on the
matters relating to the merger? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a HLTH stockholder or WebMD stockholder and you fail
to respond with a vote or instruct your broker how to vote on
the merger proposal, it will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal. If you respond and abstain
from voting, your proxy will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal. Unless the shares are held in
a brokerage account, if holders of shares of WebMD Class A
Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock sign, date and send their
proxy and do not indicate how they want to vote, their proxies
will be voted FOR the adoption of the merger
agreement and approval of the merger. If your shares are held in
a brokerage account and you do not provide your bank or broker
with instructions on how to vote your street name shares, your
bank or broker will not be permitted to vote them with respect
to the proposal regarding the merger. This results in a
broker non-vote. A broker non-vote with respect to
the proposal regarding the merger will have the same effect as a
vote AGAINST such proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my HLTH share certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. If the merger is completed, written instructions will
be sent to stockholders of HLTH with respect to the exchange of
their share certificates for the merger consideration. |
|
Q: |
|
Are stockholders entitled to exercise dissenters
rights? |
|
A: |
|
The holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock and of HLTH Common
Stock will not be entitled to exercise dissenters rights
with respect to any matter to be voted upon at the Annual
Meetings. |
* * * * *
Other
Proposals to be Voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the proposals to be voted on at the WebMD Annual
Meeting, other than the proposal regarding the merger? |
|
A: |
|
At the WebMD Annual Meeting, holders of WebMD Common Stock will
be asked: |
|
|
|
to elect three Class I directors, each to serve
a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or
his earlier resignation or removal;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify and
approve an amendment to WebMDs Amended and Restated 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the WebMD 2005
Plan, to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock
issuable under the WebMD 2005 Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to
a total of 15,600,000 shares; and
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm to serve as WebMDs
independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
|
|
|
|
Holders of WebMD Common Stock will also be asked to consider and
transact such other business as may properly come before the
WebMD Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
|
Q: |
|
What stockholder vote is required to approve the items to be
voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting, other than the merger? |
|
A: |
|
With respect to the WebMD Annual Meeting: |
|
|
|
election of directors is by a plurality of the votes
cast at the WebMD Annual Meeting with respect to the election;
accordingly, the three nominees receiving the greatest number of
votes for their election will be elected;
|
|
|
|
in order to be approved, the proposal to amend the
WebMD 2005 Plan to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common
Stock issuable under the WebMD 2005 Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to
a total of 15,600,000 shares, must receive the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding shares present or represented at the WebMD Annual
Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter; and |
|
|
|
in order to be approved, the proposal regarding
ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the voting power of the outstanding shares present or
represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.
|
|
|
|
HLTHs ownership of all outstanding shares of WebMD
Class B Common Stock represents approximately 96% of the
combined voting power of the two classes of WebMD Common Stock.
As a result, HLTH is able, acting alone, to cause the approval
of all proposals submitted for a vote at the WebMD Annual
Meeting. HLTH has indicated that it intends to vote in favor of
the amendment to the WebMD 2005 Plan and the election of Mark J.
Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning and in
favor of ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP. |
|
Q: |
|
How does the WebMD board recommend stockholders vote on the
proposals to be voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting, other than
the merger? |
|
A: |
|
The WebMD Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote
FOR the election of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil
F. Dimick and James V. Manning as Class I directors and
vote FOR the proposals to amend the WebMD 2005 Plan
and to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. |
* * * * *
Other
Proposals to be Voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the proposals to be voted on at the HLTH Annual
Meeting, other than the proposal regarding the merger? |
|
A: |
|
At the HLTH Annual Meeting, holders of HLTH Common Stock will be
asked: |
|
|
|
to elect three Class II directors, each to
serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has
qualified or his earlier resignation or removal; and
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm to serve as HLTHs
independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009, in the event that the merger is not completed.
|
|
|
|
Holders of HLTH Common Stock will also be asked to consider and
transact such other business as may properly come before the
HLTH Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
5
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What stockholder vote is required to approve the items to be
voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting, other than the merger? |
|
A: |
|
With respect to the HLTH Annual Meeting: |
|
|
|
election of directors is by a plurality of the votes
cast at the HLTH Annual Meeting with respect to the election;
accordingly, the three nominees receiving the greatest number of
votes for their election will be elected; and
|
|
|
|
in order to be approved, the proposal regarding
ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the voting power of the shares present or represented at the
meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.
|
|
Q: |
|
How does the HLTH Board of Directors recommend stockholders
vote on the proposals to be voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting,
other than the merger? |
|
A: |
|
The HLTH Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote
FOR the election of Paul A. Brooke, James V. Manning
and Martin J. Wygod as Class II directors and vote
FOR the proposal to ratify the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP. |
* * * * *
General
Matters
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
We urge you to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus
carefully, including its annexes, as well as the documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You also may want to review the documents
referenced under Where You Can Find More Information
and consult with your accounting, legal and tax advisors. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote my shares? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH
Common Stock may indicate how they want to vote on their proxy
card and then sign, date and mail their proxy card in the
enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that their
shares may be represented at the WebMD Annual Meeting or the
HLTH Annual Meeting, as applicable. Please note that if you are
a stockholder of both HLTH and WebMD, you will be receiving two
separate mailings that contain the same joint proxy
statement/prospectus, but two different proxy cards: one for the
WebMD Annual Meeting and one for the HLTH Annual Meeting. Please
complete, sign, date and return all proxy cards you receive in
order to ensure that your shares are voted at the WebMD Annual
Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as applicable. Holders of
shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock
may also attend their respective companys meeting in
person instead of submitting a proxy. |
|
|
|
Unless the shares are held in a brokerage account, if holders of
shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock
sign, date and send their proxy and do not indicate how they
want to vote, their proxies will be voted FOR the
adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger and
FOR all other proposals to be voted on at the
respective companys Annual Meeting. If the shares are held
in a brokerage account, please see the answer to the next
question. |
|
|
|
If holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH
Common Stock either fail to return their proxy card (and do not
vote in person at the meeting) or if they ABSTAIN
with respect to the proposal regarding the merger, the effect
will be the same as a vote AGAINST such proposal.
With respect to the election of directors, failure to return a
proxy card or withholding your vote will result in fewer votes
being received by the nominees, but will not affect whether the
nominees receive a plurality of the votes. With respect to all
other proposals to be voted on at the WebMD or HLTH Annual
Meeting: |
|
|
|
shares held by holders of shares of WebMD
Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock, as applicable,
who fail to return their proxy card and do not attend the
meeting in person will not be
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
counted as present or represented at the meeting and will have
no effect on whether those proposals are approved; |
|
|
|
abstentions will be treated as shares that are
present or represented at the meeting, but will not be counted
in favor of that proposal and, accordingly, will have the same
effect as a vote AGAINST those proposals.
|
|
Q: |
|
If my WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock is
held in a brokerage account or in street name, will
my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
If you do not provide your bank or broker with instructions on
how to vote your street name shares, your bank or broker will
not be permitted to vote them with respect to the proposal
regarding the merger or with respect to the proposal, at the
WebMD Annual Meeting, regarding the amendment of the WebMD 2005
Plan. This results in a broker non-vote. |
|
|
|
These broker non-votes will be counted for purposes
of establishing a quorum since the bank or broker has the
discretion to vote on election of directors and ratification of
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. A broker
non-vote with respect to the proposal regarding the merger will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST such proposal
since approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of
a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote thereon. A broker non-vote with respect to the
amendment of the WebMD 2005 Plan will result in the shares not
being considered present or represented at the meeting for
purposes of that proposal and, accordingly, will have no impact
on the outcome of the vote with respect to that proposal. |
|
|
|
You should, therefore, provide your bank or broker with
instructions on how to vote your shares or arrange to attend the
WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as the case may
be, and vote your shares in person to avoid a broker non-vote.
You are urged to utilize telephone or Internet voting if your
bank or broker has provided you with the opportunity to do so.
See the relevant voting instruction form for instructions. If
your bank or broker holds your shares and you attend the Annual
Meeting in person, you should bring a letter from your bank or
broker identifying you as the beneficial owner of the shares and
authorizing you to vote your shares at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
A. |
|
A quorum is present if a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the
meeting is present or represented. Broker non-votes and
abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining whether
a quorum is present. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I attend the WebMD Annual Meeting and vote my shares in
person? |
|
A. |
|
Yes. All holders WebMD Common Stock, including stockholders of
record and stockholders who hold their shares through banks,
brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to
attend the WebMD Annual Meeting. Holders of record of WebMD
Common Stock as of the record date can vote in person at the
WebMD Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record,
you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the record
holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee,
to be able to vote in person at the WebMD Annual Meeting. If you
plan to attend the WebMD Annual Meeting, you must hold your
shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder
of your shares confirming your ownership and you must bring a
form of personal photo identification with you in order to be
admitted. WebMD reserves the right to refuse admittance to
anyone without proper proof of share ownership or without proper
photo identification. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I attend the HLTH Annual Meeting and vote my shares in
person? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. All holders of HLTH Common Stock, including stockholders of
record and stockholders who hold their shares through banks,
brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to
attend the HLTH Annual Meeting. Holders of record of HLTH common
stock as of the record date can vote in person at the HLTH
Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, you must
obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the record holder
of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be
able to vote in person at the HLTH Annual Meeting. If you plan
to attend the HLTH Annual Meeting, |
7
|
|
|
|
|
you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from
the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership and
you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you
in order to be admitted. HLTH reserves the right to refuse
admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership or
without proper photo identification. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I do if I want to change my vote? |
|
A: |
|
You may change your vote at any time before the vote takes place
at the WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as the
case may be. To do so, you may either complete and submit a new
proxy card or send a written notice stating that you would like
to revoke your proxy. In addition, you may elect to attend the
WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as the case may
be, and vote in person, as described above. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can I contact with any additional questions? |
|
A: |
|
You may call the Investor Relations departments of WebMD or HLTH
at: |
|
|
|
WebMD Health Corp.
|
|
HLTH Corporation
|
111 Eighth Avenue
|
|
669 River Drive, Center 2
|
New York, New York 10011
|
|
Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407
|
(212)
624-3817
|
|
(201) 414-2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may also contact HLTH and WebMDs proxy solicitor at: |
|
|
|
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders call toll-free: (888)
750-5834
Banks and Brokers call collect: (212)
750-5833 |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about the companies? |
|
A: |
|
You can find more information about WebMD and HLTH in the
documents described under Where You Can Find More
Information. |
8
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all the
information that is important to you. To fully understand the
proposals to approve the merger to be voted on at the WebMD
Annual Meeting and the HLTH Annual Meeting, and for a more
complete description of the terms of the merger, you should read
carefully this entire document, including the appendices, as
well as the documents incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, and the other documents to which we
have referred you. For information on how to obtain the
documents that we have filed with the SEC, see Where You
Can Find More Information.
WebMD
(page 92)
WebMD Health Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a leading
provider of health information services to consumers, physicians
and other healthcare professionals, employers and health plans
through its public and private online portals and health-focused
publications.
|
|
|
|
|
Public Portals. WebMDs public
portals for consumers enable them to obtain health and wellness
information (including information on specific diseases or
conditions), check symptoms, locate physicians, store individual
healthcare information, receive periodic
e-newsletters
on topics of individual interest and participate in online
communities with peers and experts. WebMDs public portals
for physicians and healthcare professionals make it easier for
them to access clinical reference sources, stay abreast of the
latest clinical information, learn about new treatment options,
earn continuing medical education credit and communicate with
peers. WebMD also publishes WebMD the Magazine, a
consumer magazine distributed to physician office waiting rooms.
WebMDs public portals generate revenue primarily through
the sale of advertising and sponsorship products, as well as
continuing medical education services. The sponsors and
advertisers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device and consumer products companies. WebMD also provides
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies.
|
|
|
|
Private Portals. WebMDs private
portals enable employers and health plans to provide their
employees and plan members with access to personalized health
and benefit information and decision-support technology that
helps them make more informed benefit, provider and treatment
choices. WebMD provides related services for use by such
employees and members, including lifestyle education and
personalized telephonic health coaching. WebMD generates revenue
from its private portals through the licensing of these portals
to employers and health plans either directly or through
distributors.
|
WebMD Class A Common Stock, which has one vote per share,
began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
WBMD on September 29, 2005 and now trades on a
successor market, the Nasdaq Global Select Market. As of the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, HLTH Corporation
owns all 48,100,000 shares of WebMDs Class B
Common Stock, which has five votes per share. As of
August 31, 2009, the Class B Common Stock owned by
HLTH represents approximately 83.2% of WebMDs outstanding
Common Stock; and, since WebMD Class B Common Stock has
five votes per share and WebMD Class A Common Stock has one
vote per share, HLTHs ownership represents approximately
96% of the combined voting power of WebMDs outstanding
Common Stock.
WebMDs executive offices are located at 111 Eighth Avenue,
New York, New York 10011, and its telephone number is
(212) 624-3700.
HLTH
(page 92)
HLTH Corporation is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated
in December 1995 and commenced operations in January 1996 as
Healtheon Corporation. HLTHs controlling interest in WebMD
is described above. HLTH also owns the subsidiaries that
constitute HLTHs Porex business. Porex develops,
manufactures and distributes proprietary porous plastic products
and components used in healthcare, industrial and consumer
9
applications. Porexs customers include both end-users of
its finished products, as well as manufacturers that include
Porex components in their products. Porex is an international
business with manufacturing operations in North America, Europe
and Asia and customers in more than 75 countries. HLTH is in the
process of divesting Porex and, accordingly, has reflected Porex
as discontinued operations in its financial statements. See
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of HLTH
included as
Annex B-1
to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
HLTH Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, began trading on
the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol HLTH on
February 11, 1999 and now trades under that symbol on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market. As of August 31, 2009, there
were 105,105,340 shares of HLTH Common Stock outstanding
(including 1,121,850 unvested shares of restricted HLTH Common
Stock granted to employees of HLTH).
HLTHs executive offices are located at 669 River Drive,
Center 2, Elmwood Park, New Jersey
07407-1361,
and its telephone number is
(201) 703-3400.
The WebMD
Annual Meeting (page 185)
WebMD will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders at
9:30 a.m., Eastern time, on October 23, 2009, at The
Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York,
New York 10004. At this meeting, stockholders of WebMD will be
asked (1) to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the
merger agreement and approve the merger, (2) to elect three
Class I directors, each to serve a three-year term expiring
at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his
successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier
resignation or removal, (3) to consider and vote on a
proposal to ratify and approve an amendment to WebMDs
Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase
the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock issuable under the
Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to a total of
15,600,000 shares and (4) to consider and vote on a
proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to
serve as WebMDs independent auditor for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2009.
You can vote at the WebMD Annual Meeting only if you owned WebMD
Common Stock at the close of business on September 8, 2009,
which is the record date for that meeting.
The HLTH
Annual Meeting (page 117)
HLTH will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders at
9:30 a.m., Eastern time, on October 23, 2009, at The
Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York,
New York 10004. At this meeting, stockholders of HLTH will be
asked (1) to consider and vote on the adoption of the
merger agreement and approval of the merger, (2) to elect
three Class II directors of HLTH, each to serve a
three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or
his earlier resignation or removal, and (3) to consider and
vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm to serve as HLTHs independent auditor for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, in the event that
the merger is not completed.
You can vote at the HLTH Annual Meeting only if you owned HLTH
Common Stock at the close of business on September 8, 2009,
which is the record date for that meeting.
Terms of
the Merger (page 96)
Under the terms of the merger agreement between HLTH and WebMD,
HLTH will merge with and into WebMD and each outstanding share
of HLTH Common Stock will be converted into 0.4444 shares
of WebMD Common Stock. Upon effectiveness of the merger, the
separate corporate existence of HLTH will cease and WebMD will
succeed to and assume all the rights and obligations of HLTH in
accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (which we refer to as the General Corporation Law). In
the merger, the certificate of incorporation of WebMD will be
amended and restated to eliminate the dual class structure of
the Common Stock and to provide for a maximum number of shares
of WebMD Common Stock of 650,000,000 (an amount equal to the sum
of the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock and
10
of Class B Common Stock under the existing certificate of
incorporation). The only further changes being made to
WebMDs certificate of incorporation merely give effect, at
the time of the merger, to provisions of the existing
certificate of incorporation that would automatically have
become effective whenever HLTH ceased to own a majority of the
voting power of WebMDs outstanding Common Stock. In the
merger, existing shares of WebMDs Class B Common
Stock will be canceled. Existing shares of WebMDs
Class A Common Stock will remain outstanding as shares of
WebMD Common Stock and all shares of WebMD Common Stock will
have the same rights, including voting rights. After the merger,
WebMD Common Stock will continue to be quoted on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market, under the symbol WBMD.
Effect of
the Merger on HLTHs Convertible Notes
(page 94)
Following the merger, WebMD as the surviving corporation will
assume the obligations of HLTH under HLTHs
31/8% Convertible
Notes due September 1, 2025 and HLTHs
1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 15, 2023
(which we collectively refer to as the Convertible Notes). In
the event a holder of the Convertible Notes converts those
Convertible Notes into shares of HLTH Common Stock pursuant to
the terms of the applicable indenture prior to the effective
time of the merger, those shares would be treated in the merger
like all other shares of HLTH Common Stock. In the event a
holder of the Convertible Notes converts those Convertible Notes
pursuant to the applicable indenture following the effective
time of the merger, those Convertible Notes would be converted
into the merger consideration payable in respect of the HLTH
shares into which such Convertible Notes would have been
convertible prior to the merger. Based on the exchange ratio for
the merger and the terms of the applicable indentures, the
31/8% Convertible
Notes would have a conversion price of approximately $35.03 per
share of WebMD Common Stock and the 1.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes would have a conversion price of
approximately $34.63 per share of WebMD Common Stock.
Purposes
and Reasons for the Merger (pages 59 and 61)
The key goals for the merger include allowing HLTHs
stockholders to participate directly in the ownership of WebMD,
while eliminating HLTHs controlling interest in WebMD and
the inefficiencies associated with having two separate public
companies, and enhancing the liquidity of WebMD Common Stock by
significantly increasing the public float. The boards of
directors of HLTH and WebMD both believe that, as result of the
negotiations between HLTH and the WebMD Special Committee, the
merger agreement provides for a transaction that meets these
goals and is fair to the holders of WebMD Class A Common
Stock. The Board of Directors of HLTH also believes that the
terms of the merger are fair to the holders of HLTH Common
Stock. A detailed discussion of the background of, and reasons
for, the merger are described in The Merger
Background of the Merger, The
Merger HLTHs Purposes and Reasons for the
Merger and The Merger WebMDs
Purposes and Reasons for the Merger.
Conditions
to the Merger (page 103)
The merger will be completed only if specific conditions,
including, among others, the following, are met or waived by the
parties to the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the registration statement that includes this joint proxy
statement/prospectus has been declared effective by the SEC;
|
|
|
|
the HLTH and WebMD proposals to adopt the merger agreement and
approve the merger have been approved by the requisite votes of
the HLTH and WebMD stockholders, as applicable;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any governmental law or order that would make the
merger illegal or would otherwise prohibit the consummation of
the merger;
|
|
|
|
the shares of WebMD Common Stock to be issued in the merger have
been approved for listing on the Nasdaq Global Select Market;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of the parties to the merger
agreement are true and correct, except for inaccuracies that
would not have a material adverse effect;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
the requisite covenants of each of the parties have been
performed in all material respects in accordance with the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by each of HLTH and WebMD of a legal opinion from
its respective counsel with respect to certain U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger;
|
|
|
|
since the date of the merger agreement, there has not been a
material adverse effect relating to HLTH, on the one hand, or
WebMD, on the other hand.
|
Ownership
of WebMD After the Merger
Currently, the holders of WebMDs Class A Common Stock
hold approximately 17% of WebMDs combined issued and
outstanding shares and have approximately 4% of the combined
voting power of the outstanding shares. In connection with the
merger, WebMDs Class B Common Stock will cease to be
outstanding, and WebMDs certificate of incorporation will
be amended and restated to eliminate the dual class structure of
its shares. If the merger is completed, holders of WebMDs
Class A Common Stock immediately before the merger will
hold approximately 17% of WebMDs issued and outstanding
Common Stock immediately following the merger (based on shares
outstanding as of August 31, 2009); this will also
represent approximately 17% of the voting power of the issued
and outstanding Common Stock, since there will be only one class
of stock outstanding, and each share will have one vote. The
ownership of 17% following the merger assumes that
48.1 million shares of WebMD currently held by HLTH are
replaced by approximately 46.2 million new shares of WebMD
Common Stock, which will be issued at the rate of
0.4444 shares of WebMD for each outstanding share of HLTH.
The WebMD
Special Committee
Because of HLTHs controlling interest in WebMD, the Board
of Directors of WebMD formed the WebMD Special Committee to
consider and negotiate a possible transaction with HLTH. Each of
the members of the WebMD Special Committee is an independent
director and neither of its members serves as a director of
HLTH. The members of the WebMD Special Committee are Jerome C.
Keller and Stanley S. Trotman. The WebMD Special Committee
reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the merger
as well as the opinion of an independent investment banking firm
retained by the WebMD Special Committee that the consideration
to be paid in the merger by WebMD to holders of HLTH Common
Stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
Recommendations
of the WebMD Special Committee and the Boards of Directors
(pages 61 and 63)
|
|
|
|
|
Special Committee Recommendation. The WebMD
Special Committee unanimously recommended to the Board of
Directors of WebMD that the adoption of the merger agreement and
approval of the merger were advisable and in the best interests
of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, and that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, should be approved.
|
|
|
|
WebMD Board Recommendation. Based on the
recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee, taking into
consideration the fairness opinion of the WebMD Special
Committees financial advisor, a copy of which is attached
to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex F, the
Board of Directors of WebMD unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger, and recommends that holders of WebMD Class A
Common Stock vote FOR the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the merger, at the WebMD Annual Meeting. The
WebMD Board of Directors also recommends that, at the Annual
Meeting, WebMD stockholders vote: FOR the election
of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning
as Class I directors of WebMD; FOR the
ratification and approval of the proposed amendment to the
Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
FOR the ratification and appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm to serve as WebMDs independent auditor for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
HLTH Board Recommendation. Taking into
consideration the fairness opinion of its financial advisor, a
copy of which is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex E, the Board of Directors of
HLTH unanimously approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and
recommends that HLTH stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the
HLTH Annual Meeting. The HLTH Board of Directors also recommends
that, at the HLTH Annual Meeting, HLTH stockholders vote:
FOR the election of Paul A. Brooke, James V. Manning
and Martin J. Wygod as Class II directors of HLTH; and
FOR the ratification and appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm to serve as HLTHs independent auditor for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, in the event that
the merger is not completed.
|
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger (page 81)
In considering the recommendation of the HLTH Board of
Directors, you should be aware that certain of HLTHs
executive officers and directors may have interests in the
transaction that are different from, or are in addition to, the
interests of HLTHs unaffiliated stockholders. In
considering the recommendation of the WebMD Board of Directors,
you should be aware that certain of WebMDs executive
officers and directors may have interests in the transaction
that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of
the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. The WebMD Special
Committee, the WebMD Board of Directors and the HLTH Board of
Directors were aware of these potential or actual conflicts of
interest and considered them along with other matters when they
determined to recommend the merger. See The
Merger Background of the Merger.
HLTHs and WebMDs directors at the effective time of
the merger will become directors of the surviving corporation.
It is expected that the officers of WebMD immediately prior to
the effective time of the merger will be officers of the
surviving corporation and will generally have the same positions
they held at WebMD. Martin J. Wygod currently serves as Chairman
of the Board of both HLTH and WebMD, which are executive officer
positions, and as acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH.
Mr. Wygods employment agreement previously
contemplated that he would serve as the non-executive Chairman
of the Board of the surviving corporation following the merger.
However, in July 2009, HLTH, WebMD and Mr. Wygod agreed
that he will serve as the Executive Chairman of the Board of the
surviving corporation following the merger. See HLTH
Executive Compensation Employment Agreements with
the HLTH Named Executive Officers Martin J.
Wygod for additional information.
Certain of HLTHs executives that have provided WebMD with
services under a service agreement will also become employed by
the surviving corporation after the consummation of the merger.
The merger does not constitute a change in control under
employment agreements with HLTHs and WebMDs
executive officers. However, in connection with the merger, it
is anticipated that Kevin Cameron and Charles Mele, HLTHs
Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel, respectively, will
undergo changes in title and position that may permit them to
terminate employment with the surviving corporation as
HLTHs successor for good reason and as a result be
eligible to receive certain payments and benefits. See
HLTH Executive Compensation
Employment Agreements with the HLTH Named Executive
Officers for additional information.
For more information on the effect of the merger on the current
directors and executive officers of HLTH and WebMD, see
The Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment of the Merger (page 90)
The merger will be accounted for as a reverse merger. WebMD will
be issuing WebMD Common Stock to effect the merger and it will
survive as the publicly listed company after completion of the
merger. However, because HLTH controlled WebMD prior to the
merger and because HLTHs shareholders, as a group, will
own the majority of the total voting power of WebMDs
voting securities following the merger, FASB Statement
No. 141(R), Business Combinations does not apply to
the transaction, which will be accounted for as a merger of
entities under common control, whereby, for accounting purposes,
HLTH will be
13
treated as the acquirer and WebMD will be treated as the
acquired company. Accordingly, after the merger is completed,
WebMDs historical financial statements for periods prior
to the completion of the merger will reflect the historical
financial information of HLTH.
FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB
No. 51, requires that changes in a parent
companys ownership interest, while the parent company
retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary,
shall be accounted for as equity transactions. Although the
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock (the noncontrolling
interest in WebMD) are not exchanging their shares in the
merger, the common control merger accounting will require the
transaction to be presented as if HLTH acquired the
noncontrolling interest in WebMD. Accordingly, the deemed
acquisition by HLTH of the portion of WebMD that it does not
currently own will be accounted for as an equity transaction.
For additional information, see Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (page 104)
Even if the stockholders of WebMD and HLTH approve the WebMD and
HLTH proposals to adopt the merger agreement and approve the
merger, WebMD and HLTH can jointly agree to terminate the merger
agreement by mutual written consent. The merger agreement also
contains provisions addressing the circumstances under which
either WebMD or HLTH may terminate the merger agreement. In the
event of termination of the merger agreement pursuant to any
such provision, the merger agreement does not provide for any
termination fee to be paid by the terminating party. The merger
agreement does, however, provide that all expenses incurred by
either party and the WebMD Special Committee in connection with
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will be
paid by HLTH. For more information on the circumstances under
which WebMD or HLTH may terminate the merger agreement, see
The Merger Agreement Termination.
Dissenters
Rights (pages 90, 119 and 188)
The holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock and of HLTH
Common Stock will not be entitled to exercise dissenters
rights with respect to any matter to be voted on at the Annual
Meetings.
Listing
of WebMD Common Stock (page 87)
After the merger, the shares of WebMD Common Stock will continue
to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol
WBMD.
Market
Price and Dividend Information (page 26)
WebMD Class A Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market under the symbol WBMD. HLTH Common
Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the
symbol HLTH. The following table shows the closing
sale prices of WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common
Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on
June 17, 2009, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the proposed merger, and on
September 11, 2009, the last practicable trading day prior
to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This table
also shows the implied value of the merger consideration
proposed for each share of HLTH Common Stock, which we
calculated by multiplying the closing price of WebMD
Class A Common Stock on those dates by the exchange ratio
of 0.4444.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Share of
|
|
|
|
WebMD Class A
|
|
|
HLTH Common
|
|
|
HLTH Common
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
June 17, 2009
|
|
$
|
28.21
|
|
|
$
|
11.76
|
|
|
$
|
12.54
|
|
September 11, 2009
|
|
$
|
32.17
|
|
|
$
|
14.14
|
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
14
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF HLTH
The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated
financial information for HLTH. The selected historical
information is presented as of June 30, 2009 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004. HLTH derived the historical information for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from its
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
HLTH derived the historical information for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 from its unaudited consolidated
financial statements for those periods. In the opinion of HLTH
management, the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements incorporated by reference herein for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared on a basis
consistent with HLTHs audited consolidated financial
statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation
of the financial position and results of operations for these
periods. The operating results for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the entire year ending
December 31, 2009 of HLTH or the combined company.
The selected information set forth below should be read in
conjunction with HLTHs consolidated financial statements
and related footnotes, as well as the disclosure under the
heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in
Annex B-1
and
Annex B-2,
respectively, to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in
HLTHs quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The historical results of operations are
not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,(1)
|
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
188,895
|
|
|
$
|
166,614
|
|
|
$
|
373,462
|
|
|
$
|
319,232
|
|
|
$
|
899,585
|
|
|
$
|
842,660
|
|
|
$
|
802,444
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
75,794
|
|
|
|
62,895
|
|
|
|
135,138
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
542,723
|
|
|
|
525,405
|
|
|
|
510,661
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
54,358
|
|
|
|
50,047
|
|
|
|
106,080
|
|
|
|
91,035
|
|
|
|
116,258
|
|
|
|
101,939
|
|
|
|
111,834
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43,851
|
|
|
|
43,627
|
|
|
|
88,053
|
|
|
|
102,661
|
|
|
|
130,056
|
|
|
|
116,589
|
|
|
|
105,042
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,059
|
|
|
|
13,989
|
|
|
|
28,410
|
|
|
|
27,808
|
|
|
|
44,073
|
|
|
|
43,013
|
|
|
|
38,611
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
35,300
|
|
|
|
42,035
|
|
|
|
32,339
|
|
|
|
21,527
|
|
|
|
18,708
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
13,110
|
|
|
|
26,428
|
|
|
|
25,887
|
|
|
|
25,472
|
|
|
|
18,442
|
|
|
|
19,249
|
|
Gain on repurchases of convertible notes
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on 2006 EBS Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
352,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
(4,810
|
)
|
|
|
(5,949
|
)
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
(4,252
|
)
|
|
|
(27,965
|
)
|
|
|
(13,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
(benefit) provision
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
476,050
|
|
|
|
489,204
|
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
421,387
|
|
|
|
30,834
|
|
|
|
22,447
|
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
26,171
|
|
|
|
26,638
|
|
|
|
(9,053
|
)
|
|
|
50,033
|
|
|
|
(2,461
|
)
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
28,566
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
453,886
|
|
|
|
466,573
|
|
|
|
41,300
|
|
|
|
372,117
|
|
|
|
33,295
|
|
|
|
18,452
|
|
Consolidated (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of
tax
|
|
|
(12,767
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
94,682
|
|
|
|
(18,048
|
)
|
|
|
393,527
|
|
|
|
34,170
|
|
|
|
18,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss) income inclusive of noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
(10,265
|
)
|
|
|
453,880
|
|
|
|
561,255
|
|
|
|
23,252
|
|
|
|
765,644
|
|
|
|
67,465
|
|
|
|
36,611
|
|
(Loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
|
(10,667
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
|
|
$
|
(11,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
456,654
|
|
|
$
|
560,223
|
|
|
$
|
12,585
|
|
|
$
|
765,239
|
|
|
$
|
66,690
|
|
|
$
|
36,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to HLTH stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
456,711
|
|
|
$
|
465,725
|
|
|
$
|
31,845
|
|
|
$
|
371,844
|
|
|
$
|
32,725
|
|
|
$
|
18,452
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(11,771
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
94,498
|
|
|
|
(19,260
|
)
|
|
|
393,395
|
|
|
|
33,965
|
|
|
|
18,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
|
|
$
|
(11,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
456,654
|
|
|
$
|
560,223
|
|
|
$
|
12,585
|
|
|
$
|
765,239
|
|
|
$
|
66,690
|
|
|
$
|
36,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net (loss)
income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
102,178
|
|
|
|
182,399
|
|
|
|
174,928
|
|
|
|
179,330
|
|
|
|
279,234
|
|
|
|
341,747
|
|
|
|
320,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
104,514
|
|
|
|
228,209
|
|
|
|
220,127
|
|
|
|
188,763
|
|
|
|
331,642
|
|
|
|
352,852
|
|
|
|
333,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
As of
December 31,(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(2)(3)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
828,456
|
|
|
$
|
918,268
|
|
|
$
|
830,120
|
|
|
$
|
651,464
|
|
|
$
|
427,433
|
|
|
$
|
617,493
|
|
Working capital (excluding assets and liabilities of
discontinued operations)
|
|
|
551,544
|
|
|
|
633,462
|
|
|
|
860,181
|
|
|
|
617,101
|
|
|
|
397,555
|
|
|
|
43,681
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,393,768
|
|
|
|
1,501,734
|
|
|
|
1,651,481
|
|
|
|
1,469,795
|
|
|
|
2,213,558
|
|
|
|
2,309,419
|
|
Convertible notes, net of discount
|
|
|
488,474
|
|
|
|
614,018
|
|
|
|
605,776
|
|
|
|
598,121
|
|
|
|
590,987
|
|
|
|
649,999
|
|
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,768
|
|
|
|
98,533
|
|
|
|
98,299
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in WHC
|
|
|
149,058
|
|
|
|
134,223
|
|
|
|
131,353
|
|
|
|
101,860
|
|
|
|
43,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
HLTH stockholders equity
|
|
|
491,627
|
|
|
|
496,698
|
|
|
|
642,809
|
|
|
|
422,853
|
|
|
|
1,118,237
|
|
|
|
1,214,876
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On July 22, 2008, HLTH
completed the sale of its ViPS segment and in March 2009 and
February 2008 HLTH decided to divest WebMDs Little Blue
Book print directory business and the Porex segment,
respectively. Accordingly, the selected consolidated financial
data has been reclassified to reflect the historical results for
these businesses as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
|
|
(2)
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2006, the consolidated financial position and
results of operations reflect the sale of a 52% interest in
HLTHs Emdeon Business Services segment (which is refer to
as EBS), as of November 16, 2006. Accordingly, the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 excludes
the assets and liabilities of EBS and includes an investment in
EBS Master LLC accounted for under the equity method of
accounting related to HLTHs 48% ownership, and the
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006 includes the operations of EBS for the
period January 1, 2006 through November 16, 2006 and
our 48% equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC from
November 17, 2006 through December 31, 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
|
On September 14, 2006, HLTH
completed the sale of the Emdeon Practice Services segment.
Accordingly, this selected consolidated financial data has been
reclassified to reflect the historical results of the Emdeon
Practice Services segment as a discontinued operation for this
and all prior periods presented.
|
|
(4)
|
|
On January 1, 2006, HLTH
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(Revised 2004): Share Based Payment that resulted in
additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense beginning
in 2006 and subsequent periods.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The selected financial data for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, do not reflect the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Boards Staff
Position No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) for HLTHs
31/4% Convertible
Notes, which were outstanding during those periods and were
fully redeemed or converted to equity during the year ended
December 31, 2005.
|
16
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF WEBMD
The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated
financial information for WebMD. The selected historical
information is presented as of June 30, 2009 and for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004. WebMD derived the historical information for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from its
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.
WebMD derived the historical information for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 from its unaudited
consolidated financial statements for those periods. In the
opinion of WebMD management, the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements incorporated by reference herein for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared
on a basis consistent with WebMDs audited consolidated
financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position and results of operations
for these periods. The operating results for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the entire year ending
December 31, 2009 of WebMD or the combined company.
The selected information set forth below should be read in
conjunction with WebMDs consolidated financial statements
and related footnotes, as well as the disclosure under the
heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in
Annex C-1
and
Annex C-2,
respectively, to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
WebMDs quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The historical results of operations are
not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30,(1)
|
|
|
Years Ended December
31,(1)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006(3)(4)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
188,895
|
|
|
$
|
166,654
|
|
|
$
|
373,542
|
|
|
$
|
319,493
|
|
|
$
|
239,434
|
|
|
$
|
154,560
|
|
|
$
|
120,287
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
75,794
|
|
|
|
62,895
|
|
|
|
135,138
|
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
98,692
|
|
|
|
63,077
|
|
|
|
45,123
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
54,358
|
|
|
|
50,047
|
|
|
|
106,080
|
|
|
|
91,035
|
|
|
|
73,344
|
|
|
|
49,026
|
|
|
|
44,976
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
29,865
|
|
|
|
27,691
|
|
|
|
56,635
|
|
|
|
59,326
|
|
|
|
50,060
|
|
|
|
27,937
|
|
|
|
20,461
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,741
|
|
|
|
13,759
|
|
|
|
27,921
|
|
|
|
26,785
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
10,113
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
5,803
|
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
|
|
12,378
|
|
|
|
5,099
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,406
|
|
|
|
27,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
provision (benefit)
|
|
|
17,036
|
|
|
|
(9,341
|
)
|
|
|
27,904
|
|
|
|
40,725
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
|
|
4,633
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
6,847
|
|
|
|
7,933
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
(17,644
|
)
|
|
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
10,189
|
|
|
|
(17,274
|
)
|
|
|
25,693
|
|
|
|
58,369
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
4,830
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,899
|
|
|
$
|
(16,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,702
|
|
|
$
|
65,884
|
|
|
$
|
2,536
|
|
|
$
|
6,565
|
|
|
$
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
57,625
|
|
|
|
57,664
|
|
|
|
57,717
|
|
|
|
57,184
|
|
|
|
56,145
|
|
|
|
50,132
|
|
|
|
48,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
58,245
|
|
|
|
57,664
|
|
|
|
58,925
|
|
|
|
59,743
|
|
|
|
58,075
|
|
|
|
50,532
|
|
|
|
48,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
As of December
31,(1)
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
|
|
|
373,208
|
|
|
$
|
325,222
|
|
|
$
|
294,653
|
|
|
$
|
54,150
|
|
|
$
|
153,777
|
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
Working capital (excluding assets and liabilities of
discontinued operations)
|
|
|
220,429
|
|
|
|
186,571
|
|
|
|
290,614
|
|
|
|
184,966
|
|
|
|
152,337
|
|
|
|
9,011
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
772,454
|
|
|
|
755,932
|
|
|
|
720,173
|
|
|
|
619,965
|
|
|
|
376,889
|
|
|
|
146,496
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
7,803
|
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
9,210
|
|
|
|
7,912
|
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
647,589
|
|
|
|
633,718
|
|
|
|
606,755
|
|
|
|
496,109
|
|
|
|
295,955
|
|
|
|
98,560
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In March 2009, Board of Directors
of WebMD decided to divest the Little Blue Book print directory
business. Accordingly, this selected consolidated financial data
has been reclassified to reflect the historical results of the
Little Blue Book print directory business as discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
|
|
(2)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, WebMD
completed the sale of its medical reference publications
business. Accordingly, this selected consolidated financial data
has been reclassified to reflect historical results of our
medical reference publications business as discontinued
operations for this and all prior periods presented.
|
|
(3)
|
|
During 2006, WebMD acquired Subimo
LLC on December 15, 2006, Medsite Inc. on
September 11, 2006, Summex Corporation on June 13,
2006 and eMedicine.com Inc. on January 17, 2006. The
results of operations of these acquired companies have been
included in our financial statements from the respective
acquisition dates.
|
|
(4)
|
|
On January 1, 2006, WebMD
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(Revised 2004): Share-Based Payment that resulted in
additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense beginning
in 2006.
|
18
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements are based on the historical financial
statements of WebMD and HLTH after giving effect to the merger
as a purchase of the minority interest in WebMD by HLTH, as more
fully described in Note 1 below.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the
year ended December 31, 2008 assume the merger between
WebMD and HLTH occurred on January 1, 2008. The unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2009 assumes the merger had occurred on
June 30, 2009.
As more fully described in Note 2 below, the historical
consolidated financial statements of HLTH have been adjusted to
give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly
attributable to the merger, (2) factually supportable, and
(3) with respect to the statements of operations, expected
to have a continuing impact on the consolidated results. No
adjustment has been made to reflect anticipated reductions in
corporate expenses following the merger.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared for illustrative purposes only and
are not necessarily indicative of the financial condition or
results of operations of future periods or the financial
condition or results of operations that actually would have been
realized had the entities been a single entity as of or for the
periods presented. The unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information should be read together with
the historical financial statements and related notes of WebMD
and HLTH that each have filed with the SEC and that are included
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
19
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF
JUNE 30, 2009
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical HLTH
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
555,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
555,247
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
78,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,674
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
48,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,974
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
124,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
807,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807,840
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
273,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,209
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
56,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,864
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
202,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,104
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
28,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,888
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
24,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,393,768
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,393,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
45,090
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
48,590
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
86,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,261
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
113,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
244,939
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
248,439
|
|
1.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2023
|
|
|
264,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,583
|
|
31/8%
convertible notes due 2025, net of discount of $26,409
|
|
|
223,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,891
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
19,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,670
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company stockholders equity
|
|
|
491,627
|
|
|
|
145,558
|
(a)(b)
|
|
|
637,185
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in WebMD
|
|
|
149,058
|
|
|
|
(149,058
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
640,685
|
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
637,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
$
|
1,393,768
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,393,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical HLTH
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
188,895
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
188,895
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
75,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,794
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
54,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,358
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,851
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,059
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,220
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
Gain on repurchase of convertible notes
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tax benefit
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
Consolidated loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(12,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss inclusive of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(10,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,265
|
)
|
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
997
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Company stockholders
|
|
$
|
(11,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
997
|
|
|
$
|
(10,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Company stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
2,502
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(11,771
|
)
|
|
|
(996
|
)(c)
|
|
|
(12,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Company stockholders
|
|
$
|
(11,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
997
|
|
|
$
|
(10,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per common share (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
102,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
104,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical HLTH
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
373,462
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
373,462
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
135,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,138
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
106,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,080
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
88,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,053
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
28,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,410
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
35,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,300
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
26,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,428
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision
|
|
|
489,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,204
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
26,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,638
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations
|
|
|
466,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,573
|
|
Consolidated income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
94,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income inclusive of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
561,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561,255
|
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
|
1,032
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Company stockholders
|
|
$
|
560,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
561,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Company stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
465,725
|
|
|
$
|
848
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
466,573
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
94,498
|
|
|
|
184
|
(c)
|
|
|
94,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Company stockholders
|
|
$
|
560,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
561,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing income
from continuing operations per common share (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
174,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
220,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements are based on the historical financial statements of
WebMD and HLTH after giving effect to the merger, which is being
accounted for as a reverse merger. WebMD is the legal acquirer
in the merger as it will be issuing its equity to effect the
merger and it will survive as the publicly listed company after
completion of the merger. However, because HLTH controlled WebMD
prior to the merger and because HLTHs shareholders as a
group will own the majority of the voting rights of WebMD
following the merger, FASB Statement No. 141(R),
Business Combinations does not apply to the transaction,
which will be accounted for as a merger of entities under common
control, whereby, for accounting purposes, HLTH will be treated
as the acquirer and WebMD will be treated as the acquired
company. Accordingly, after the merger is completed,
WebMDs historical financial statements for periods prior
to the completion of the merger will reflect the historical
financial information of HLTH.
FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB
No. 51, requires that changes in a parents
ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling
financial interest in its subsidiary, shall be accounted for as
equity transactions. Although the non-HLTH stockholders of WebMD
are not exchanging their shares in the merger, the common
control merger accounting requires the transaction to be
presented as if HLTH acquired the noncontrolling interest in
WebMD. Accordingly, the deemed acquisition by HLTH of the
portion of WebMD it does not currently own (the noncontrolling
interest) will be accounted for as an equity transaction.
The pro forma adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009
assume the merger took place on June 30, 2009 and are as
follows:
(a) Reflects the elimination of the noncontrolling interest
in WebMD.
(b) Reflects the accrual of estimated transaction expenses,
primarily representing costs of financial and legal advisors.
These costs will be charged to equity, consistent with the
acquisition of the noncontrolling interest.
The pro forma adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008
assume the merger took place on January 1, 2008 and are as
follows:
(c) Reflects the elimination of net income attributable to
the noncontrolling interest in WebMD.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements exclude any adjustments to reflect anticipated
reductions in corporate expenses following the merger.
|
|
3.
|
Pro Forma
Income Per Share
|
The weighted average number of shares used to calculate pro
forma basic and diluted income per share is based on the
weighted average number of basic and diluted shares of WebMD
Common Stock outstanding during the pro forma periods, adjusted
for (i) the retirement of the 48,100 shares of
WebMDs Class B Common Stock held by HLTH and
(ii) the issuance of new WebMD shares equal to the weighted
average number of basic and diluted shares of HLTH Common Stock
outstanding during the pro forma periods, multiplied by the
exchange ratio of 0.4444. Additionally, the convertible notes
were dilutive to the calculation of pro forma earnings per share
during the year ended December 31, 2008, and accordingly,
the numerator and
23
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
denominator were adjusted as if the convertible notes were
converted during this period. The following table presents the
calculation of pro forma basic and diluted income per common
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income from continuing operations Basic
|
|
$
|
2,502
|
|
|
$
|
466,573
|
|
Interest expense on convertible notes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income from continuing operations Diluted
|
|
$
|
2,502
|
|
|
$
|
482,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares Basic
|
|
|
54,933
|
|
|
|
87,355
|
|
Employee stock options and warrants
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares Diluted
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
108,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income per share Basic
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma income per share Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of the weighted
average number of shares used to calculate pro forma basic and
diluted income per share (all share amounts are reflected in
terms of weighted averages during the periods presented):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
WebMD common shares
|
|
|
57,625
|
|
|
|
57,717
|
|
WebMD Class B common shares being retired
|
|
|
(48,100
|
)
|
|
|
(48,100
|
)
|
HLTH common shares converted (Note d)
|
|
|
45,408
|
|
|
|
77,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
54,933
|
|
|
|
87,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and warrants:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD (historical)
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
HLTH converted (Note d)
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes (Note d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
108,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(d) The following table summarizes the weighted average
shares outstanding of HLTH, multiplied by the exchange ratio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Weighted Average Number of HLTH Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Weighted Average Number of WebMD Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Exchange ratio
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Common shares basic
|
|
|
102,178
|
|
|
|
174,928
|
|
|
|
0.4444
|
|
|
|
45,408
|
|
|
|
77,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares options and warrants
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
0.4444
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
Diluted shares convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,016
|
|
|
|
0.4444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted shares
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
45,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
20,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MARKET
PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock are listed
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The following table sets
forth for the periods indicated the high and low per share sale
price of WebMDs Class A Common Stock and HLTHs
Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
HLTH
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
44.27
|
|
|
$
|
28.55
|
|
|
$
|
11.18
|
|
|
$
|
8.32
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
47.30
|
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
|
$
|
10.41
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
46.85
|
|
|
$
|
34.25
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.45
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
41.71
|
|
|
$
|
33.93
|
|
|
$
|
12.78
|
|
|
$
|
11.37
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
57.28
|
|
|
$
|
40.09
|
|
|
$
|
16.23
|
|
|
$
|
12.28
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
58.53
|
|
|
$
|
46.07
|
|
|
$
|
16.56
|
|
|
$
|
13.72
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
58.65
|
|
|
$
|
44.16
|
|
|
$
|
15.25
|
|
|
$
|
12.56
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
63.49
|
|
|
$
|
38.73
|
|
|
$
|
16.39
|
|
|
$
|
12.93
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
41.99
|
|
|
$
|
23.15
|
|
|
$
|
13.56
|
|
|
$
|
9.52
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
35.40
|
|
|
$
|
21.86
|
|
|
$
|
12.62
|
|
|
$
|
9.52
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
35.00
|
|
|
$
|
23.80
|
|
|
$
|
12.70
|
|
|
$
|
10.73
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
29.99
|
|
|
$
|
13.63
|
|
|
$
|
11.36
|
|
|
$
|
6.80
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.20
|
|
|
$
|
19.37
|
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.65
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
30.70
|
|
|
$
|
20.15
|
|
|
$
|
13.43
|
|
|
$
|
10.11
|
|
Third Quarter (through September 11, 2009)
|
|
$
|
34.43
|
|
|
$
|
28.73
|
|
|
$
|
15.20
|
|
|
$
|
12.70
|
|
On June 17, 2009, the last full trading day prior to the
public announcement of the proposed merger, the closing price
per share of WebMD Class A Common Stock quoted on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market was $28.21 and the closing price per
share of HLTH Common Stock quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market was $11.76. On September 11, 2009, the last
practicable trading day prior to mailing this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the closing price per share of WebMD
Class A Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market was $32.17 and the closing price per share of HLTH Common
Stock reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $14.14.
HLTH stockholders are encouraged to obtain current market
quotations for WebMD Class A Common Stock prior to making
any decision with respect to the merger. No assurance can be
given concerning the market price for WebMD Common Stock before
or after the date on which the merger is consummated. The market
price for WebMD Common Stock will fluctuate between the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date on which the
merger is consummated and thereafter.
Neither WebMD nor HLTH has ever declared or paid any cash
dividends on its Common Stock, and does not anticipate paying
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms
of the merger agreement with WebMD prohibit HLTH from declaring
or paying any dividends.
26
COMPARATIVE
SHARE DATA
The historical per share income (loss) from continuing
operations and book value of WebMD and HLTH shown in the table
below are derived from their unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the Six months ended June 30, 2009
and their audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The pro forma comparative per
share data for WebMD Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock was
derived from the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus beginning on page 19. The pro forma
book value per share information was computed as if the merger
had been completed on June 30, 2009. You should read this
information in conjunction with such pro forma financial
statements and the related notes and with the historical
financial information of WebMD and HLTH included or incorporated
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including
WebMDs and HLTHs financial statements and related
notes. The pro forma shares outstanding as of June 30, 2009
assumes that (x) 103,199,609 shares of HLTH Common
Stock are converted based on an exchange ratio of
0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock and
(y) 57,715,851 shares of WebMD Common Stock are
reduced by the 48,100,000 shares currently held by HLTH.
The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of actual
results had the merger occurred during the periods indicated and
is not necessarily indicative of future operations of the
combined entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HLTH
|
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Net book value per common share
|
|
$
|
4.76
|
|
|
$
|
11.22
|
|
|
$
|
11.49
|
|
Shares outstanding as of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
103,199,609
|
|
|
|
57,715,851
|
|
|
|
55,477,757
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
5.34
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
4.44
|
|
27
RISK
FACTORS
This section describes circumstances or events that could have a
negative effect on HLTHs and WebMDs financial
results or operations or that could change, for the worse,
existing trends in some or all of their businesses. The
occurrence of one or more of the circumstances or events
described below could have a material adverse effect on either
or both companies financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows or on the trading prices of the
capital stock that WebMD or HLTH has issued or securities either
company may issue in the future. The risks and uncertainties
described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are not the
only ones facing HLTH and WebMD. Additional risks and
uncertainties that are not currently known to HLTH or WebMD or
that HLTH and WebMD currently believe are immaterial may also
adversely affect the respective companies business and
operations.
Risks
Related to the Merger for Holders of WebMD Class A Common
Stock
In addition to the risk factors discussed in this section,
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will, if the merger
is consummated, also become subject to the risks described below
in the sections entitled Other Risks Related to HLTH
and, unless Porex is sold prior to completion of the merger,
Risks Related to Porex.
The
merger will result in a substantial increase in the number of
shares of WebMD Common Stock available for trading, which could
depress the price of such stock and/or increase the volatility
of the price of such stock, both before and after completion of
the merger
Although the merger is expected to reduce the total number of
outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock, the merger will
greatly increase the number of such shares available for sale in
the public markets. Currently, all 48,100,000 outstanding shares
of WebMD Class B Common Stock are held by HLTH and do not
trade in the public markets. As of August 31, 2009,
approximately 9,710,000 shares of WebMD Class A Common
Stock (the class traded publicly) were outstanding. Upon
completion of the merger, the WebMD Class B Common Stock
would be cancelled and would cease to be outstanding, but more
than 46,210,000 new shares of WebMD Common Stock would be issued
to holders of HLTH Common Stock and become immediately available
for sale. Additional shares could become available for sale at
or after that time depending upon:
|
|
|
|
|
whether holders of options to purchase HLTH Common Stock
exercise those options and the timing of such exercises; and
|
|
|
|
whether holders of convertible notes issued by HLTH convert
those notes and the timing of any such conversions.
|
Sales of large amounts of WebMD Common Stock could depress the
market price of WebMD Common Stock. In addition, the potential
that such sales may occur could depress prices even in advance
of such sales. WebMD cannot predict the effect that the merger
will have on the price of WebMD Common Stock, both before and
after completion of the merger.
The
merger is subject to closing conditions that, if not satisfied
or waived, will result in the merger not being completed, which
may cause the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock to
decline
The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing,
including the receipt of required approvals of the stockholders
of HLTH and WebMD and receipt of opinions of counsel relating to
tax matters. If any condition to the merger is not satisfied or,
if permissible, waived, the merger will not be completed.
Generally, waiver by WebMD of a condition to closing of the
merger will require approval of the WebMD Special Committee that
negotiated the transaction with HLTH. WebMD cannot predict what
the effect on the market price of WebMD Class A Common
Stock would be if the merger is not able to be completed, but
depending on market conditions at the time, it could result in a
decline in that market price. In addition, if there is
uncertainty regarding whether the merger will be completed
(including uncertainty regarding whether the conditions to
closing will be met), that could result in a decline in the
market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock or an increase
in the volatility of that market price.
28
In the
event that HLTH does not sell Porex prior to the closing of the
merger, WebMD would become exposed to the risks inherent in the
ownership and disposition of Porex
HLTH has announced that it plans to divest its Porex business.
However, the merger could be completed before the sale of such
business is completed. In that case, WebMD (as the surviving
company in the merger) would become the owner of that business
and the sale process would continue. WebMD would then be subject
to the risk that the proceeds from the sale of that business are
less than expected and all other risks inherent in the ownership
of that business. There can be no assurances regarding whether
WebMD would be able to complete such sale or as to the timing or
terms of such transaction and, if WebMD is unable to complete
the sale of Porex, it could be required to reclassify the
operations of Porex as continuing operations of WebMD. Even if
HLTH has entered into an agreement with an acquirer with respect
to the remaining business prior to completion of the merger,
WebMD would be subject to the risk that the conditions to
closing provided for in such agreement might not be met.
The financial results and operations of Porex could be adversely
affected by the diversion of management resources to the sale
process, including the efforts devoted to the sale process to
date, and by uncertainty regarding the outcome of the process.
For example, the uncertainty of who will own the business in the
future could lead such business to lose or fail to attract
employees, customers or business partners. This could adversely
affect its operations and financial results and, as a result,
the sale price that HLTH or WebMD may receive for such business.
Future
results of the combined company may differ materially from the
pro forma financial information presented in this
document
Future results of the combined company may be materially
different from those shown in the pro forma financial statements
that are based on the historical results of WebMD and HLTH in
conjunction with certain adjustments based on assumptions
regarding the merger.
The
fairness opinions obtained by WebMD and HLTH will not reflect
changes in circumstances between the signing of the agreement
and plan of merger and the merger
Neither WebMD nor HLTH has obtained updated opinions as of the
date of this document from its financial advisors. By the time
the merger is completed, changes in the operations and prospects
of WebMD or HLTH, general market and economic conditions and
other factors that may be beyond the control of WebMD and HLTH,
and on which each financial advisors opinion was based,
may significantly alter the value of WebMD or HLTH or the prices
of shares of WebMD Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock from those
prices and values on June 17, 2009, the date each such
opinion was delivered. Neither of the opinions speaks as of the
time the merger will be completed or as of any date other than
the date of such opinions. Because neither WebMD nor HLTH
currently anticipates asking their respective financial advisors
to update their respective opinions, neither of the opinions
will address the fairness of the merger consideration or the
exchange ratio from a financial point of view at the time the
merger is completed. Each of the HLTH Board of Directors
recommendation that HLTH stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger and the WebMD
Board of Directors recommendation that WebMD stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to adopt the agreement and
plan of merger, however, is as of the date of this document. For
a description of the opinions that WebMD and HLTH received from
their respective financial advisors, see The
Merger Opinion of HLTHs Financial Advisor,
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and The
Merger Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD
Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.
Following
the merger, the utilization of the net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards of WebMD and HLTH may be subject to
additional limitations under the Code
HLTH and WebMD each have substantial accumulated net operating
loss carryforwards (which we refer to as NOL carryforwards) and
tax credits that will be available to be carried forward to
future tax periods following the merger. On November 25,
2008, HLTH repurchased 83,699,922 shares of its common
stock in a tender offer. The tender offer resulted in a
cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of
HLTHs
29
stock, as determined under rules prescribed by the Code and
applicable Treasury regulations. As a result of this ownership
change, there will be an annual limitation on the amount of the
NOL carryforwards and tax credits that HLTH and WebMD may use to
offset income in each tax year following the ownership change.
The merger may increase the possibility of another such annual
limitation. Because substantially all of HLTHs and
WebMDs NOL carryforwards have already been reduced by a
valuation allowance for financial accounting purposes, we would
not expect an annual limitation on the utilization of the NOL
carryforwards to significantly reduce the net deferred tax
asset, although the timing of cash flows may be impacted to the
extent any such annual limitation deferred the utilization of
NOL carryforwards to future tax years.
Risks
Related to the Merger for Holders of HLTH Common Stock
The
merger will result in a substantial increase in the number of
shares of WebMD Common Stock available for trading, which could
depress the price of such stock and/or increase the volatility
of the price of such stock, both before and after completion of
the merger
Upon completion of the merger, shares of HLTH Common Stock will
be converted into shares of WebMD Common Stock. Although the
merger is expected to reduce the total number of outstanding
shares of WebMD Common Stock, the merger will greatly increase
the number of such shares available for sale in the public
markets. Currently, all 48,100,000 outstanding shares of WebMD
Class B Common Stock are held by HLTH and do not trade in
the public markets. As of August 31, 2009, approximately
9,710,000 shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock (the
class traded publicly) were outstanding. Upon completion of the
merger, the WebMD Class B Common Stock would be canceled
and would cease to be outstanding, but more than 46,210,000 new
shares of WebMD Common Stock would be issued to holders of HLTH
Common Stock and become immediately available for sale.
Additional shares could become available for sale at or after
that time depending upon:
|
|
|
|
|
whether holders of options to purchase HLTH Common Stock
exercise those options and the timing of such exercises; and
|
|
|
|
whether holders of convertible notes issued by HLTH convert
those notes and the timing of any such conversions.
|
Sales of large amounts of WebMD Common Stock could depress the
market price of WebMD Common Stock. In addition, the potential
that such sales may occur could depress prices even in advance
of such sales. HLTH cannot predict the effect that the merger
will have on the price of WebMD Common Stock, either before or
after completion of the merger.
As the
market price of WebMD Common Stock may fluctuate, and the
closing date of the merger is not yet ascertainable, HLTH
stockholders cannot be certain of the market value of the WebMD
common shares that they will receive in the merger
Upon completion of the merger, each share of HLTH Common Stock
will be converted into merger consideration consisting of 0.4444
of a share of WebMD Common Stock. The market value of the merger
consideration may vary from the closing price of WebMD Common
Stock on the date we announced the merger, on the date that this
document was mailed to HLTH stockholders, on the date of the
HLTH Annual Meeting and on the date we complete the merger and
thereafter. Any change in the market price of WebMD Common Stock
prior to completion of the merger will affect the market value
of the merger consideration that HLTH stockholders will receive
upon completion of the merger. Accordingly, at the time of the
HLTH Annual Meeting, HLTH stockholders will not know or be able
to calculate the market value of the merger consideration they
would receive upon completion of the merger. Neither company is
permitted to terminate the merger agreement or resolicit the
vote of HLTH stockholders solely because of changes in the
market prices of either companys stock. There will be no
adjustment to the merger consideration for changes in the market
price of either shares of WebMD Common Stock or shares of HLTH
Common Stock. Stock price changes may result from a variety of
factors, including general market and economic conditions,
changes in
30
our respective businesses, operations and prospects, and
regulatory considerations. Many of these factors are beyond our
control. You should obtain current market quotations for shares
of HLTH Common Stock and for shares of WebMD Common Stock.
The
merger is subject to closing conditions that, if not satisfied
or waived, will result in the merger not being completed, which
may cause the market price of HLTH Common Stock to
decline
The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing,
including the receipt of required approvals of the stockholders
of HLTH and WebMD and receipt of opinions of counsel relating to
tax matters. If any condition to the merger is not satisfied or,
if permissible, waived, the merger will not be completed.
Generally, waiver by WebMD of a condition to closing will
require approval of the WebMD Special Committee that negotiated
the transaction with HLTH. HLTH cannot predict what the effect
on the market price of HLTH Common Stock would be if the merger
is not able to be completed, but depending on market conditions
at the time, it could result in a decline in that market price.
In addition, if there is uncertainty regarding whether the
merger will be completed (including uncertainty regarding
whether the conditions to closing will be met), that could
result in a decline in the market price of HLTH Common Stock or
an increase in the volatility of that market price.
Future
results of the combined company may differ materially from the
pro forma financial information presented in this
document
Future results of the combined company may be materially
different from those shown in the pro forma financial statements
that are based on the historical results of WebMD and HLTH in
conjunction with certain adjustments based on assumptions
regarding the merger.
The
fairness opinions obtained by WebMD and HLTH will not reflect
changes in circumstances between the signing of the agreement
and plan of merger and the merger
Neither WebMD nor HLTH has obtained updated opinions as of the
date of this document from its financial advisors. By the time
the merger is completed, changes in the operations and prospects
of WebMD or HLTH, general market and economic conditions and
other factors that may be beyond the control of WebMD and HLTH,
and on which each financial advisors opinion was based,
may significantly alter the value of WebMD or HLTH or the prices
of shares of WebMD Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock from those
prices and values on June 17, 2009, the date each such
opinion was delivered. Neither of the opinions speaks as of the
time the merger will be completed or as of any date other than
the date of such opinions. Because neither WebMD nor HLTH
currently anticipates asking their respective financial advisors
to update their respective opinions, neither of the opinions
will address the fairness of the merger consideration or the
exchange ratio from a financial point of view at the time the
merger is completed. Each of the HLTH Board of Directors
recommendation that HLTH stockholders vote FOR the
proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger and the WebMD
Board of Directors recommendation that WebMD stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to adopt the agreement and
plan of merger, however, is as of the date of this document. For
a description of the opinions that WebMD and HLTH received from
their respective financial advisors, see The
Merger Opinion of HLTHs Financial Advisor,
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and The
Merger Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD
Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.
The
receipt of shares of WebMD Common Stock in the merger may be
taxable to HLTH shareholders
If the merger fails to qualify as a reorganization, the receipt
of shares of WebMD Common Stock in the merger will be taxable to
HLTH shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Additionally, HLTH would recognize gain or loss in respect to
the transfer of its assets (including WebMD stock) to WebMD
pursuant to the Merger. The merger is conditioned upon the
receipt by HLTH and WebMD of tax opinions from
Shearman & Sterling LLP (which we refer to as
Shearman) and Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP (which we
refer to as Cahill), respectively, dated as of the closing date
of the merger that the merger will qualify as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. These
opinions will be based on the accuracy of certain factual
representations and covenants made by WebMD and HLTH (including
those contained in officers certificates to be provided by
WebMD and HLTH at the time of closing), and on
31
customary factual assumptions, limitations and qualifications.
The tax opinions do not bind the Internal Revenue Service, which
we refer to as the IRS, and do not prevent the IRS from
asserting a contrary opinion. In addition, if any of the
representations or assumptions upon which the tax opinions are
based are inconsistent with the actual facts, the merger might
not qualify as a reorganization. For more information, see
The Merger Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences of the Merger.
HLTH shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine
the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including
any federal, state, local, foreign or other tax consequences,
and any tax return filing or other reporting requirements.
Following
the merger, the utilization of the net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards of WebMD and HLTH may be subject to
additional limitations under the Code
HLTH and WebMD each have substantial accumulated NOL
carryforwards and tax credits that will be available to be
carried forward to future tax periods following the merger. On
November 25, 2008, HLTH repurchased 83,699,922 shares
of its common stock in a tender offer. The tender offer resulted
in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of
HLTHs stock, as determined under rules prescribed by the
Code and applicable Treasury regulations. As a result of this
ownership change, there will be an annual limitation on the
amount of the NOL carryforwards and tax credits that HLTH and
WebMD may use to offset income in each tax year following such
ownership change. The merger may increase the possibility of
another such annual limitation. Because substantially all of
HLTHs and WebMDs NOL carryforwards have already been
reduced by a valuation allowance for financial accounting
purposes, we would not expect an annual limitation on the
utilization of the NOL carryforwards to significantly reduce the
net deferred tax asset, although the timing of cash flows may be
impacted to the extent any such annual limitation deferred the
utilization of NOL carryforwards to future tax years.
HLTH
officers and directors have financial interests in the merger
that differ from the interests of HLTH
stockholders
HLTHs executive officers and directors have financial
interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, the interests of HLTHs stockholders. The members of
the HLTH Board of Directors were aware of and considered these
interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating
the merger agreement and the merger, and in recommending to HLTH
stockholders that the merger agreement be adopted. For more
information about these interests, please see The
Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger.
The
structure of the potential compensation payable to Raymond
James, the financial advisor to HLTH, contains incentives for
issuing the fairness opinion.
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated November 7, 2007
between HLTH and Raymond James, HLTH paid Raymond James a fee of
$100,000 upon delivery of its fairness opinion to the HLTH Board
of Directors in connection with the merger. The engagement
letter also provides that Raymond James will be paid a
$1,000,000 fee if the merger is completed. HLTH also previously
paid a retainer fee of $50,000 and an opinion fee of $500,000 to
Raymond James in connection with the terminated 2008 merger
transaction between HLTH and WebMD. HLTH negotiated this fee
structure so that it would not have to pay the additional
$1,000,000 fee if the merger were not consummated. At the time
HLTHs Board of Directors requested delivery of a fairness
opinion from Raymond James in connection with the merger,
HLTHs Board understood the potential incentives to issue a
fairness opinion created by the applicable fee structure.
However, HLTHs Board believed that Raymond James would
apply appropriate professional judgment in connection with its
delivery of such opinion, regardless of the fee structure.
Nonetheless, HLTH stockholders should, in reviewing Raymond
James fairness opinion, be aware of the incentives to
issuing the fairness opinion created by the fee structure
negotiated by HLTH with Raymond James.
32
Risks
Related to WebMD and Ownership of its Securities
The following risks related to WebMD and ownership of its
securities currently affect both holders of WebMD Class A
Common Stock and, by virtue of HLTHs ownership interest in
WebMD, holders of HLTH Common Stock. After the merger,
stockholders of the combined company will continue to be subject
to these risks.
Risks
Related to WebMDs Operations and the Healthcare Content
WebMD Provides
If
WebMD is unable to provide content and services that attract and
retain users to The WebMD Health Network on a consistent basis,
its advertising and sponsorship revenue could be
reduced
Users of The WebMD Health Network have numerous other
online and offline sources of healthcare information services.
WebMDs ability to compete for user traffic on its public
portals depends upon its ability to make available a variety of
health and medical content, decision-support applications and
other services that meet the needs of a variety of types of
users, including consumers, physicians and other healthcare
professionals, with a variety of reasons for seeking
information. WebMDs ability to do so depends, in turn, on:
|
|
|
|
|
its ability to hire and retain qualified authors, journalists
and independent writers;
|
|
|
|
its ability to license quality content from third parties; and
|
|
|
|
its ability to monitor and respond to increases and decreases in
user interest in specific topics.
|
We cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to continue to
develop or acquire needed content, applications and tools at a
reasonable cost. In addition, since consumer users of
WebMDs public portals may be attracted to The WebMD
Health Network as a result of a specific condition or for a
specific purpose, it is difficult for us to predict the rate at
which they will return to the public portals. Because WebMD
generates revenue by, among other things, selling sponsorships
of specific pages, sections or events on The WebMD Health
Network, a decline in user traffic levels or a reduction in
the number of pages viewed by users could cause WebMDs
revenue to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on
WebMDs results of operations.
Developing
and implementing new and updated applications, features and
services for WebMDs public and private portals may be more
difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than
expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue
to justify the costs
Attracting and retaining users of WebMDs public portals
and clients for WebMDs private portals requires WebMD to
continue to improve the technology underlying those portals and
to continue to develop new and updated applications, features
and services for those portals. If WebMD is unable to do so on a
timely basis or if it is unable to implement new applications,
features and services without disruption to existing ones, WebMD
may lose potential users and clients.
WebMD relies on a combination of internal development, strategic
relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop its portals
and related applications, features and services. Its development
and/or
implementation of new technologies, applications, features and
services may cost more than expected, may take longer than
originally expected, may require more testing than originally
anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional
personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that
the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies,
applications, features or services will justify the amounts
spent.
WebMD
faces significant competition for its healthcare information
products and services
The markets for healthcare information products and services are
intensely competitive, continually evolving and, in some cases,
subject to rapid change.
|
|
|
|
|
WebMDs public portals face competition from numerous other
companies, both in attracting users and in generating revenue
from advertisers and sponsors. WebMD competes for users with
online services
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
and Web sites that provide health-related information, including
both commercial sites and
not-for-profit
sites. WebMD competes for advertisers and sponsors with:
health-related Web sites; general purpose consumer Web sites
that offer specialized health
sub-channels;
other high-traffic Web sites that include both
healthcare-related and non-healthcare-related content and
services; search engines that provide specialized health search;
and advertising networks that aggregate traffic from multiple
sites. WebMDs public portals also face competition from
offline publications and information services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMDs private portals compete with: providers of
healthcare decision-support tools and online health management
applications, including personal health records; wellness and
disease management vendors; and health information services and
health management offerings of healthcare benefits companies and
their affiliates.
|
Many of WebMDs competitors have greater financial,
technical, product development, marketing and other resources
than WebMD does. These organizations may be better known than
WebMD is and have more customers or users than WebMD does. We
cannot provide assurance that WebMD will be able to compete
successfully against these organizations or any alliances they
have formed or may form. Since there are no substantial barriers
to entry into the markets in which WebMDs public portals
participate, we expect that competitors will continue to enter
these markets.
Failure
to maintain and enhance the WebMD brand could have a
material adverse effect on WebMDs business
We believe that the WebMD brand identity that WebMD
has developed has contributed to the success of its business and
has helped it achieve recognition as a trusted source of health
and wellness information. We also believe that maintaining and
enhancing that brand is important to expanding the user base for
WebMDs public portals, to its relationships with sponsors
and advertisers and to its ability to gain additional employer
and healthcare payer clients for our private portals. WebMD has
expended considerable resources on establishing and enhancing
the WebMD brand and its other brands, and it has
developed policies and procedures designed to preserve and
enhance its brands, including editorial procedures designed to
provide quality control of the information it publishes. WebMD
expects to continue to devote resources and efforts to maintain
and enhance its brands. However, WebMD may not be able to
successfully maintain or enhance awareness of its brands, and
events outside of its control may have a negative effect on its
brands. If WebMD is unable to maintain or enhance awareness of
its brands, and do so in a cost-effective manner, its business
could be adversely affected.
WebMDs
online businesses have a limited operating history
WebMDs online businesses have a limited operating history
and participate in relatively new markets. These markets, and
WebMDs online businesses, have undergone significant
changes during their short history and can be expected to
continue to change. Many companies with business plans based on
providing healthcare information and related services through
the Internet have failed to be profitable and some have filed
for bankruptcy
and/or
ceased operations. Even if demand from users exists, we cannot
assure you that WebMDs businesses will continue to be
profitable.
WebMDs
failure to attract and retain qualified executives and employees
may have a material adverse effect on its business
WebMDs business depends largely on the skills, experience
and performance of key members of its management team. WebMD
also depends, in part, on its ability to attract and retain
qualified writers and editors, software developers and other
technical personnel and sales and marketing personnel.
Competition for qualified personnel in the healthcare
information services and Internet industries is intense. We
cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to hire or retain a
sufficient number of qualified personnel to meet its
requirements, or that WebMD will be able to do so at salary and
benefit costs that are acceptable to it. Failure to do so may
have an adverse effect on WebMDs business.
34
The
timing of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue may
vary significantly from quarter to quarter and is subject to
factors beyond its control, including regulatory changes
affecting advertising and promotion of drugs and medical devices
and general economic conditions
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of
factors, many of which are not in its control, and some of which
may be difficult to forecast accurately, including potential
effects on demand for its services as a result of general
economic conditions and regulatory changes affecting advertising
and promotion of drugs and medical devices. The majority of
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship programs are for terms
of approximately four to twelve months. WebMD has relatively few
longer term advertising and sponsorship programs. We cannot
assure you that WebMDs current advertisers and sponsors
will continue to use its services beyond the terms of their
existing contracts or that they will enter into any additional
contracts.
The time between the date of initial contact with a potential
advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and the
execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for that
program may be lengthy, especially for larger contracts, and may
be subject to delays over which WebMD has little or no control,
including as a result of budgetary constraints of the advertiser
or sponsor or their need for internal approvals. Other factors
that could affect the timing of contracting for specific
programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of revenue
under such contracts, include:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved
uses for existing products;
|
|
|
|
the timing of FDA approval of generic products that compete with
existing brand name products;
|
|
|
|
the timing of withdrawals of products from the market;
|
|
|
|
the timing of rollouts of new or enhanced services on
WebMDs public portals;
|
|
|
|
seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health
conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing
of promotional campaigns for specific products; and
|
|
|
|
the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other
healthcare professionals.
|
WebMD
may be unsuccessful in its efforts to increase advertising and
sponsorship revenue from consumer products
companies
Most of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue has, in
the past, come from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical
device companies. WebMD has been focusing on increasing
sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies that are
interested in communicating health-related or safety-related
information about their products to WebMDs audience.
However, while many consumer products companies are increasing
the portion of their promotional spending used on the Internet,
we cannot assure you that these advertisers and sponsors will
find WebMDs consumer Web sites to be as effective as other
Web sites or traditional media for promoting their products and
services. If WebMD encounters difficulties in competing with the
other alternatives available to consumer products companies,
this portion of its business may develop more slowly than we
expect or may fail to develop. In addition, revenues from
consumer products companies are more likely to reflect general
economic conditions, and to be reduced to a greater extent
during economic downturns or recessions, than revenues from
pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies.
Lengthy
sales and implementation cycles for WebMDs private online
portals make it difficult to forecast WebMDs revenues from
these applications and may have an adverse impact on its
business
The period from WebMDs initial contact with a potential
client for a private online portal and the first purchase of its
solution by the client is difficult to predict. In the past,
this period has generally ranged from six to twelve months, but
in some cases has been longer. Potential sales may be subject to
delays or cancellations due to a clients internal
procedures for approving large expenditures and other factors
beyond WebMDs control, including the effect of general
economic conditions on the willingness of potential clients to
commit to licensing WebMDs private portals. The time it
takes to implement a private online portal is also difficult to
predict and has lasted as long as six months from contract
execution to the commencement of live
35
operation. Implementation may be subject to delays based on the
availability of the internal resources of the client that are
needed and other factors outside of WebMDs control. As a
result, WebMD has limited ability to forecast the timing of
revenue from new clients. This, in turn, makes it more difficult
to predict WebMDs financial performance from quarter to
quarter.
During the sales cycle and the implementation period, WebMD may
expend substantial time, effort and money preparing contract
proposals, negotiating contracts and implementing the private
online portal without receiving any related revenue. In
addition, many of the expenses related to providing private
online portals are relatively fixed in the short term, including
personnel costs and technology and infrastructure costs. Even if
WebMDs private portal revenue is lower than expected,
WebMD may not be able to reduce related short-term spending in
response. Any shortfall in such revenue would have a direct
impact on WebMDs results of operations.
WebMDs
ability to provide comparative information on hospital cost and
quality depends on its ability to obtain the required data on a
timely basis and, if WebMD is unable to do so, its private
portal services would be less attractive to
clients
WebMD provides, in connection with its private portal services,
comparative information about hospital cost and quality.
WebMDs ability to provide this information depends on its
ability to obtain comprehensive, reliable data. WebMD currently
obtains this data from a number of public and private sources,
including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
many individual states and the Leapfrog Group. WebMD cannot
provide assurance that it would be able to find alternative
sources for this data on acceptable terms and conditions.
Accordingly, WebMDs business could be negatively impacted
if CMS or WebMDs other data sources cease to make such
information available or impose terms and conditions for making
it available that are not consistent with WebMDs planned
usage. In addition, the quality of the comparative information
services that WebMD provides depends on the reliability of the
information that WebMD is able to obtain. If the information
WebMD uses to provide these services contains errors or is
otherwise unreliable, WebMD could lose clients and its
reputation could be damaged.
WebMDs
ability to renew existing agreements with employers and health
plans will depend, in part, on its ability to continue to
increase usage of its private portal services by their employees
and plan members
In a healthcare market where a greater share of the
responsibility for healthcare costs and decision-making has been
increasingly shifting to consumers, use of information
technology (including personal health records) to assist
consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare has also
increased. WebMD believes that, through its WebMD Health and
Benefits Manager platform, including its personal health record
application, it is well positioned to play a role in this
consumer-directed healthcare environment, and that these
services will be a significant driver for the growth of its
private portals during the next several years. However,
WebMDs growth strategy depends, in part, on increasing
usage of its private portal services by its employer and health
plan clients employees and members, respectively.
Increasing usage of WebMDs services requires it to
continue to deliver and improve the underlying technology and
develop new and updated applications, features and services. In
addition, WebMD faces competition in the area of healthcare
decision-support tools and online health management applications
and health information services. Many of WebMDs
competitors have greater financial, technical, product
development, marketing and other resources than it does, and may
be better known than it is. We cannot provide assurance that
WebMD will be able to meet its development and implementation
goals or that WebMD will be able to compete successfully against
other vendors offering competitive services and, if WebMD is
unable to do so, it may experience static or diminished usage
for its private portal services and possible non-renewals of its
customer agreements.
WebMD
may be subject to claims brought against it as a result of
content it provides
Consumers access health-related information through WebMDs
online services, including information regarding particular
medical conditions and possible adverse reactions or side
effects from medications. If WebMDs content, or content
that WebMD obtains from third parties, contains inaccuracies, it
is possible that consumers, employees, health plan members or
others may sue WebMD for various causes of action. Although
36
WebMDs Web sites contain terms and conditions, including
disclaimers of liability, that are intended to reduce or
eliminate its liability, the law governing the validity and
enforceability of online agreements and other electronic
transactions is evolving. WebMD could be subject to claims by
third parties that its online agreements with consumers and
physicians that provide the terms and conditions for use of
WebMDs public or private portals are unenforceable. A
finding by a court that these agreements are invalid and that
WebMD is subject to liability could harm its business and
require costly changes to its business.
WebMD has editorial procedures in place to provide quality
control of the information that it publishes or provides.
However, we cannot assure you that WebMDs editorial and
other quality control procedures will be sufficient to ensure
that there are no errors or omissions in particular content.
Even if potential claims do not result in liability to WebMD,
investigating and defending against these claims could be
expensive and time consuming and could divert managements
attention away from WebMDs operations. In addition,
WebMDs business is based on establishing the reputation of
its portals as trustworthy and dependable sources of healthcare
information. Allegations of impropriety or inaccuracy, even if
unfounded, could harm WebMDs reputation and business.
Expansion
to markets outside the United States will subject WebMD to
additional risks
One element of WebMDs growth strategy is to seek to expand
its online services to markets outside the United States.
Generally, WebMD expects that it would accomplish this through
partnerships or joint ventures with other companies having
expertise in the specific country or region. However,
WebMDs participation in international markets will still
be subject to certain risks beyond those applicable to its
operations in the United States, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations outside of the
United States;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a wide variety of legal, regulatory
and market requirements;
|
|
|
|
variability of economic and political conditions, including the
extent of the impact of recent adverse economic conditions in
markets outside the United States;
|
|
|
|
tariffs or other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
costs of providing and marketing products and services in
different markets;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on
repatriation of earnings; and
|
|
|
|
difficulties in protecting intellectual property.
|
Risks
Related to the Internet and WebMDs Technological
Infrastructure
Any
service interruption or failure in the systems that we use to
provide online services could harm our business
WebMDs online services are designed to operate
24 hours a day, seven days a week, without interruption.
However, WebMD has experienced and expects that it will, in the
future, experience interruptions and delays in services and
availability from time to time. WebMD relies on internal systems
as well as third-party vendors, including data center providers
and bandwidth providers, to provide its online services. WebMD
may not maintain redundant systems or facilities for some of
these services. In the event of a catastrophic event with
respect to one or more of these systems or facilities, WebMD may
experience an extended period of system unavailability, which
could negatively impact its relationship with users. In
addition, system failures may result in loss of data, including
user registration data, content, and other data critical to the
operation of WebMDs online services, which could cause
significant harm to its business and our reputation.
37
To operate without interruption or loss of data, both WebMD and
its service providers must guard against:
|
|
|
|
|
damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
communications failures;
|
|
|
|
software and hardware errors, failures and crashes;
|
|
|
|
security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive
problems; and
|
|
|
|
other potential service interruptions.
|
Any disruption in the network access or co-location services
provided by third-party providers to WebMD or any failure by
these third-party providers or WebMDs own systems to
handle current or higher volume of use could significantly harm
WebMDs business. WebMD exercises little control over these
third-party vendors, which increases WebMDs vulnerability
to problems with services they provide.
Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in
connection with these third-party technologies and information
services or WebMDs own systems could negatively impact
WebMDs relationships with users and adversely affect
WebMDs brand and its business and could expose it to
liabilities to third parties. Although WebMD maintains insurance
for its business, the coverage under its policies may not be
adequate to compensate it for all losses that may occur. In
addition, we cannot provide assurance that WebMD will continue
to be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at an
acceptable cost.
Implementation
of additions to or changes in hardware and software platforms
used to deliver WebMDs online services may result in
performance problems and may not provide the additional
functionality that was expected
From time to time, WebMD implements additions to or changes in
the hardware and software platforms it uses for providing its
online services. During and after the implementation of
additions or changes, a platform may not perform as expected,
which could result in interruptions in operations, an increase
in response time or an inability to track performance metrics.
In addition, in connection with integrating acquired businesses,
WebMD may move their operations to WebMDs hardware and
software platforms or make other changes, any of which could
result in interruptions in those operations. Any significant
interruption in WebMDs ability to operate any of its
online services could have an adverse effect on its
relationships with users and clients and, as a result, on its
financial results. WebMD relies on a combination of purchasing,
licensing, internal development, and acquisitions to develop its
hardware and software platforms. WebMDs implementation of
additions to or changes in these platforms may cost more than
originally expected, may take longer than originally expected,
and may require more testing than originally anticipated. In
addition, we cannot provide assurance that additions to or
changes in these platforms will provide the additional
functionality and other benefits that were originally expected.
If the
systems WebMD uses to provide online portals experience security
breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, its business
could suffer
WebMD retains and transmits confidential information, including
personal health records, in the processing centers and other
facilities that it uses to provide online services. It is
critical that these facilities and infrastructure remain secure
and be perceived by the marketplace as secure. A security breach
could damage WebMDs reputation or result in liability.
WebMD may be required to expend significant capital and other
resources to protect against security breaches and hackers or to
alleviate problems caused by breaches. Despite the
implementation of security measures, this infrastructure or
other systems that WebMD interfaces with, including the Internet
and related systems, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins,
hackers, improper employee or contractor access, computer
viruses, programming errors,
denial-of-service
attacks or other attacks by third parties or similar disruptive
problems. Any compromise of WebMDs security, whether as a
result of its own systems or the systems that they interface
with, could reduce demand for WebMDs services
38
and could subject it to legal claims from its clients and users,
including for breach of contract or breach of warranty.
WebMDs
online services are dependent on the development and maintenance
of the Internet infrastructure
WebMDs ability to deliver its online services is dependent
on the development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the
Internet by third parties. The Internet has experienced a
variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to
portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and
delays in the future. The Internet has also experienced, and is
likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the
number of users and the amount of traffic. If the Internet
continues to experience increased usage, the Internet
infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on
it. In addition, the reliability and performance of the Internet
may be harmed by increased usage or by
denial-of-service
attacks. Any resulting interruptions in WebMDs services or
increases in response time could, if significant, result in a
loss of potential or existing users of and advertisers and
sponsors on WebMDs Web sites and, if sustained or
repeated, could reduce the attractiveness of WebMDs
services.
Customers who utilize WebMDs online services depend on
Internet service providers and other Web site operators for
access to WebMDs Web sites. All of these providers have
experienced significant outages in the past and could experience
outages, delays and other difficulties in the future due to
system failures unrelated to WebMDs systems. Any such
outages or other failures on their part could reduce traffic to
WebMDs Web sites.
Third
parties may challenge the enforceability of WebMDs online
agreements
The law governing the validity and enforceability of online
agreements and other electronic transactions is evolving. WebMD
could be subject to claims by third parties that the online
terms and conditions for use of WebMDs Web sites,
including disclaimers or limitations of liability, are
unenforceable. A finding by a court that these terms and
conditions or other online agreements are invalid could harm
WebMDs business.
WebMD
could be subject to breach of warranty or other claims by
clients of its online portals if the software and systems WebMD
uses to provide these services contain errors or experience
failures
Errors in the software and systems WebMD uses could cause
serious problems for clients of WebMDs online portals.
WebMD may fail to meet contractual performance standards or
client expectations. Clients of WebMDs online portals may
seek compensation from WebMD or may seek to terminate their
agreements with WebMD, withhold payments due to WebMD, seek
refunds from us of part or all of the fees charged under those
agreements or initiate litigation or other dispute resolution
procedures. In addition, WebMD could face breach of warranty or
other claims by clients or additional development costs.
WebMDs software and systems are inherently complex and,
despite testing and quality control, we cannot be certain that
they will perform as planned.
WebMD attempts to limit, by contract, its liability to its
clients for damages arising from its negligence, errors or
mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not
be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not
provide sufficient protection to WebMD from liability for
damages. WebMD maintains liability insurance coverage, including
coverage for errors and omissions. However, it is possible that
claims could exceed the amount of WebMDs applicable
insurance coverage, if any, or that this coverage may not
continue to be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient
amounts. Even if these claims do not result in liability to
WebMD, investigating and defending against them would be
expensive and time consuming and could divert managements
attention away from WebMDs operations. In addition,
negative publicity caused by these events may delay or hinder
market acceptance of WebMDs services, including unrelated
services.
39
Risks
Related to the Healthcare Industry, Healthcare Regulation and
Internet Regulation
Developments
in the healthcare industry could adversely affect WebMDs
business
Most of WebMDs revenue is derived from the healthcare
industry and could be affected by changes affecting healthcare
spending. WebMD is particularly dependent on pharmaceutical,
biotechnology and medical device companies for its advertising
and sponsorship revenue. General reductions in expenditures by
healthcare industry participants could result from, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
government regulation or private initiatives that affect the
manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients,
payers or other healthcare industry participants, including
changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products
and services;
|
|
|
|
consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
|
|
|
|
reductions in governmental funding for healthcare; and
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting
healthcare payers or providers, pharmaceutical, biotechnology or
medical device companies or other healthcare industry
participants.
|
Federal and state legislatures and agencies periodically
consider reforming aspects of the United States healthcare
system and Congress is currently considering significant
healthcare reform legislation. Healthcare reform legislation, if
enacted, may increase governmental involvement in healthcare and
health insurance, may change the way health insurance is funded
(including the role that employers play in such funding), may
change reimbursement rates and other terms of such insurance
coverage, may affect the way information technology is used in
healthcare, and may otherwise change the environment in which
healthcare industry participants operate and the specific roles
such participants play in the industry. Healthcare industry
participants may respond to healthcare reform legislation or
proposed legislation by reducing their expenditures or
postponing expenditure decisions, including expenditures for
WebMDs services. We are unable to predict future
legislation or proposals with any certainty or to predict the
effect they could have on WebMD.
Even if general expenditures by industry participants remain the
same or increase, developments in the healthcare industry may
result in reduced spending in some or all of the specific market
segments that WebMD serves or is planning to serve. For example,
use of WebMDs products and services could be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the design of health insurance plans;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming
to market; and
|
|
|
|
decreases in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical or medical
device companies, including as a result of governmental
regulation or private initiatives that discourage or prohibit
advertising or sponsorship activities by pharmaceutical or
medical device companies.
|
In addition, the expectations of WebMDs customers
regarding pending or potential industry developments may also
affect their budgeting processes and spending plans with respect
to products and services of the types that WebMD provides.
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent
years and we expect that significant changes will continue to
occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the
healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot assure
you that the markets for WebMDs products and services will
continue to exist at current levels or that WebMD will have
adequate technical, financial and marketing resources to react
to changes in those markets.
Government
regulation of healthcare creates risks and challenges with
respect to WebMDs compliance efforts and its business
strategies
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to
changing political, legislative, regulatory and other
influences. Existing and new laws and regulations affecting the
healthcare industry could create
40
unexpected liabilities for WebMD, could cause it to incur
additional costs and could restrict its operations. Many
healthcare laws are complex, and their application to specific
products and services may not be clear. In particular, many
existing healthcare laws and regulations, when enacted, did not
anticipate the healthcare information services that WebMD
provides. However, these laws and regulations may nonetheless be
applied to WebMDs products and services. WebMDs
failure to accurately anticipate the application of these laws
and regulations, or other failure to comply, could create
liability for WebMD, result in adverse publicity and negatively
affect its businesses. Some of the risks that WebMD faces from
healthcare regulation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Regulation of Drug and Medical Device Advertising and
Promotion. The WebMD Health Network provides
services involving advertising and promotion of prescription and
over-the-counter
drugs and medical devices. If the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finds that any
information on The WebMD Health Network or in WebMD
the Magazine violates FDA or FTC regulations, they may take
regulatory or judicial action against WebMD
and/or the
advertiser or sponsor of that information. State attorneys
general may also take similar action based on their states
consumer protection statutes. Any increase or change in
regulation of drug or medical device advertising and promotion
could make it more difficult for WebMD to contract for
sponsorships and advertising. Members of Congress, physician
groups and others have criticized the FDAs current
policies, and have called for restrictions on advertising of
prescription drugs to consumers and increased FDA enforcement.
We cannot predict what actions the FDA or industry participants
may take in response to these criticisms. It is also possible
that new laws would be enacted that impose restrictions on such
advertising. In addition, recent private industry initiatives
have resulted in voluntary restrictions, which advertisers and
sponsors have agreed to follow. WebMDs advertising and
sponsorship revenue could be materially reduced by additional
restrictions on the advertising of prescription drugs and
medical devices to consumers, whether imposed by law or
regulation or required under policies adopted by industry
members.
|
|
|
|
Anti-kickback Laws. There are federal and
state laws that govern patient referrals, physician financial
relationships and inducements to healthcare providers and
patients. The federal healthcare programs anti-kickback
law prohibits any person or entity from offering, paying,
soliciting or receiving anything of value, directly or
indirectly, for the referral of patients covered by Medicare,
Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs or the leasing,
purchasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the lease,
purchase or order of any item, good, facility or service covered
by these programs. Many states also have similar anti-kickback
laws that are not necessarily limited to items or services for
which payment is made by a federal healthcare program. These
laws are applicable to manufacturers and distributors and,
therefore, may restrict how WebMD and some of its customers
market products to healthcare providers, including
e-details.
Any determination by a state or federal regulatory agency that
any of WebMDs practices violate any of these laws could
subject it to civil or criminal penalties and require it to
change or terminate some portions of its business and could have
an adverse effect on its business. Even an unsuccessful
challenge by regulatory authorities of WebMDs practices
could result in adverse publicity and be costly for it to
respond to.
|
|
|
|
Medical Professional Regulation. The practice
of most healthcare professions requires licensing under
applicable state law. In addition, the laws in some states
prohibit business entities from practicing medicine. If a state
determines that some portion of WebMDs business violates
these laws, it may seek to have it discontinue those portions or
subject it to penalties or licensure requirements. Any
determination that WebMD is a healthcare provider and has acted
improperly as a healthcare provider may result in liability to
WebMD.
|
Government
regulation of the Internet could adversely affect WebMDs
business
The Internet and its associated technologies are subject to
government regulation. However, whether and how existing laws
and regulations in various jurisdictions, including privacy and
consumer protection laws, apply to the Internet is still
uncertain. WebMDs failure, or the failure of its business
partners or third-party service providers, to accurately
anticipate the application of these laws and regulations to
WebMDs products
41
and services and the manner in which WebMD delivers them, or any
other failure to comply with such laws and regulations, could
create liability for WebMD, result in adverse publicity and
negatively affect its business. In addition, new laws and
regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws and
regulations, may be adopted with respect to the Internet and
online services, including in areas such as: user privacy,
confidentiality, consumer protection, pricing, content,
copyrights and patents, and characteristics and quality of
products and services. We cannot predict how these laws or
regulations will affect WebMDs business.
Internet user privacy and the use of consumer information to
track online activities are major issues both in the United
States and abroad. For example, in February 2009, the FTC
published Self Regulatory Principles to govern the tracking of
consumers activities online in order to deliver
advertising targeted to the interests of individual consumers
(sometimes referred to as behavioral advertising). These
principles serve as guidelines to industry. In addition, there
is the possibility of proposed legislation and enforcement
activities relating to behavioral advertising. WebMD has privacy
policies posted on its Web sites that we believe comply with
applicable laws requiring notice to users about WebMDs
information collection, use and disclosure practices. WebMD also
notifies users about its information collection, use and
disclosure practices relating to data that it receive through
offline means such as paper health risk assessments. We cannot
assure you that the privacy policies and other statements that
WebMD provides to users of its products and services, or its
practices will be found sufficient to protect it from liability
or adverse publicity in this area. A determination by a state or
federal agency or court that any of WebMDs practices do
not meet applicable standards, or the implementation of new
standards or requirements, could adversely affect its business.
WebMD
faces potential liability related to the privacy and security of
personal health information it collects from or on behalf of
users of its services
Privacy and security of personal health information,
particularly personal health information stored or transmitted
electronically, is a major issue in the United States. The
Privacy Standards and Security Standards under the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (or HIPAA)
establish a set of national privacy and security standards for
the protection of individually identifiable health information
by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare
providers (referred to as covered entities) and their business
associates. Currently, only covered entities are directly
subject to potential civil and criminal liability under these
Standards. However, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 (which we refer to as ARRA) amends the HIPAA Privacy and
Security Standards and makes certain provisions applicable to
those portions of WebMDs business (such as those managing
employee or plan member health information for employers or
health plans) that are business associates of covered entities.
Currently, WebMD is bound by certain contracts and agreements to
use and disclose protected health information in a manner
consistent with the Privacy Standards and Security Standards.
Beginning on February 17, 2010, some provisions of the
HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards will apply directly to
WebMD. Currently, depending on the facts and circumstances,
WebMD could potentially be subject to criminal liability for
aiding and abetting or conspiring with a covered entity to
violate the Privacy Standards or Security Standards. As of
February 17, 2010, WebMD will be directly subject to
HIPAAs criminal and civil penalties. We cannot assure you
that WebMD will adequately address the risks created by these
Standards.
We are unable to predict what changes to these Standards might
be made in the future or how those changes, or other changes in
applicable laws and regulations, could affect WebMDs
business. Any new legislation or regulation in the area of
privacy of personal information, including personal health
information, could affect the way WebMD operates its business
and could harm its business.
Failure
to maintain CME accreditation could adversely affect Medscape,
LLCs ability to provide online CME offerings
Medscape, LLCs continuing medical education (or CME)
activities are planned and implemented in accordance with the
current Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation
Council for Continuing Medical Education, or ACCME, which
oversees providers of CME credit, and other applicable
accreditation standards. ACCMEs standards for commercial
support of CME are intended to ensure, among other things, that
CME activities of ACCME-accredited providers, such as Medscape,
LLC, are independent of commercial interests,
42
which are defined as entities that produce, market, re-sell or
distribute healthcare goods and services, excluding certain
organizations. Commercial interests, and entities
owned or controlled by commercial interests, are
ineligible for accreditation by the ACCME. The standards also
provide that accredited CME providers may not place their CME
content on Web sites owned or controlled by a commercial
interest. In addition, accredited CME providers may not
ask commercial interests for speaker or topic
suggestions, and are also prohibited from asking
commercial interests to review CME content prior to
delivery.
From time to time, ACCME revises its standards for commercial
support of CME. As a result of certain past ACCME revisions,
WebMD adjusted its corporate structure and made changes to its
management and operations intended to allow Medscape, LLC to
provide CME activities that are developed independently from
programs developed by its sister companies, which may not be
independent of commercial interests. We believe that
these changes allow Medscape, LLC to satisfy the applicable
standards.
In June 2008, the ACCME published for comment several proposals,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The ACCME stated that due consideration should be given to
eliminating commercial support of CME.
|
|
|
|
The ACCME proposed that: (a) accredited providers must not
receive communications from commercial interests announcing or
prescribing any specific content that would be a preferred, or
sought-after, topic for commercially supported CME (e.g.,
therapeutic area, product-line, patho-physiology); and
(b) receiving communications from commercial interests
regarding a commercial interests internal criteria for
providing commercial support would also not be permissible.
|
The comment period for these proposals ended on
September 12, 2008, and the ACCME has determined not to
take any action as to these proposals at this point. However, in
April 2009, the ACCME published for comment several other
proposals, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Support-Free
Designation. In order to clarify the distinction
between CME that does include relationships with industry from
CME that does not include relationships with industry, the ACCME
is considering creating a new designation and review process for
CME providers that wish to identify their program of CME as one
that does not utilize funds donated by commercial interests. The
designation would be termed: Commercial
Support-Free. The ACCME has indicated that a range of
standards for Commercial Support-Free CME are
possible, including for example: (1) the CME provider not
accepting any commercial support for any CME activity, or any
part of its CME program; and (2) the CME provider not using
funds from advertising or promotion, paid by commercial
interests, to underwrite the costs of CME.
|
|
|
|
Independent CME Funding Entity. The ACCME is
considering creating a granting entity that would accept
unrestricted donations for the purpose of funding CME. The funds
would be distributed to ACCME recognized and accredited
organizations for development and presentation of
ACCME-compliant CME. The ACCME is proposing for comment that the
entity would: (1) be independent of the ACCME; (2) not
provide funds to the ACCME; (3) be managed by its own
governance structure; (4) establish its own granting
criteria reflecting practice gaps established through methods
consistent with ACCMEs content validation policies; and
(5) fund CME done for U.S. learners.
|
The comment period for these proposals ended on May 21,
2009. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the process,
including what other alternatives may be considered by ACCME as
a result of comments it has received. The elimination of, or
restrictions on, commercial support for CME could adversely
affect the volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented
through WebMDs Web sites.
Medscape, LLCs current ACCME accreditation expires at the
end of July 2010. In order for Medscape, LLC to renew its
accreditation, it will be required to demonstrate to the ACCME
that it continues to meet ACCME requirements. If Medscape, LLC
fails to maintain its status as an accredited ACCME provider
(whether at the time of such renewal or at an earlier time as a
result of a failure to comply with existing or additional ACCME
standards), it would not be permitted to accredit CME activities
for physicians and other healthcare professionals. Instead,
Medscape, LLC would be required to use third parties to provide
such CME-
43
related services. That, in turn, could discourage potential
supporters from engaging Medscape, LLC to develop CME or
education-related activities, which could have a material
adverse effect on WebMDs business.
Government
regulation and industry initiatives could adversely affect the
volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through
Medscape, LLCs Web sites or require changes to how it
offers CME
CME activities may be subject to government oversight or
regulation by Congress, the FDA, the Department of Health and
Human Services (the federal agency responsible for interpreting
certain federal laws relating to healthcare), and by state
regulatory agencies. Medscape, LLC
and/or the
sponsors of the CME activities that Medscape, LLC accredits may
be subject to enforcement actions if any of these CME activities
are deemed improperly promotional, potentially leading to the
termination of sponsorships.
During the past several years, educational activities, including
CME, directed at physicians have been subject to increased
governmental scrutiny to ensure that sponsors do not influence
or control the content of the activities. For example, the
U.S. Senate Finance Committee conducted an investigation of
the sponsorship of CME activities, including an examination of
the ACCMEs role in ensuring that CME activities are
independent from the influence of their supporters. In response,
pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies have
developed and implemented internal controls and procedures that
promote adherence to applicable regulations and requirements. In
implementing these controls and procedures, supporters of CME
may interpret the regulations and requirements differently and
may implement varying procedures or requirements. These controls
and procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
may discourage pharmaceutical companies from providing grants
for independent educational activities;
|
|
|
|
may slow their internal approval for such grants;
|
|
|
|
may reduce the volume of sponsored educational programs that
Medscape, LLC produces to levels that are lower than in the
past, thereby reducing revenue; and
|
|
|
|
may require Medscape, LLC to make changes to how it offers or
provides educational programs, including CME.
|
In addition, future changes to laws, regulations or
accreditation standards, or to the internal compliance programs
of supporters or potential supporters, may further discourage,
significantly limit, or prohibit supporters or potential
supporters from engaging in educational activities with
Medscape, LLC, or may require Medscape, LLC to make further
changes in the way it offers or provides educational activities.
Other
Risks Applicable to WebMD and Ownership of its
Securities
Negative
conditions in the market for certain ARS may result in WebMD
incurring a loss on such investments
As of June 30, 2009, WebMD had a total of approximately
$163.9 million (face value) of investments in certain ARS.
Those ARS had a book value of $126.3 million as of
June 30, 2009. The types of ARS investments that WebMD owns
are backed by student loans, 97% of which are guaranteed under
the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all had
credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. WebMD does not own
any other type of ARS investments.
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held
auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being
able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In
the event WebMD needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments,
it may not be able to do so until a future auction on these
types of investments is successful or until a buyer is found
outside the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling
to purchase the investments at their carrying amount, WebMD
would incur a loss on any such sales. In addition, the credit
ratings on some of the ARS investments in our portfolio have
been downgraded, and there may be additional such rating
downgrades in the future. If uncertainties in the credit and
capital markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or
ARS investments in our portfolio experience additional credit
44
rating downgrades, there could be further fair value adjustments
or
other-than-temporary
impairments in the carrying value of our ARS investments.
WebMD
may not be successful in protecting its intellectual property
and proprietary rights
WebMDs intellectual property and proprietary rights are
important to its businesses. The steps that WebMD takes to
protect its intellectual property, proprietary information and
trade secrets may prove to be inadequate and, whether or not
adequate, may be expensive. WebMD relies on a combination of
trade secret, patent and other intellectual property laws and
confidentiality procedures and non-disclosure contractual
provisions to protect our intellectual property. We cannot
assure you that WebMD will be able to detect potential or actual
misappropriation or infringement of its intellectual property,
proprietary information or trade secrets. Even if WebMD detects
misappropriation or infringement by a third party, we cannot
assure you that it will be able to enforce its rights at a
reasonable cost, or at all. In addition, WebMDs rights to
intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets
may not prevent independent third-party development and
commercialization of competing products or services.
Third
parties may claim that WebMD is infringing their intellectual
property, and it could suffer significant litigation or
licensing expenses or be prevented from providing certain
services, which may harm its business
WebMD could be subject to claims that it is misappropriating or
infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of
others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be
expensive to defend and divert managements attention from
WebMDs operations. If WebMD becomes liable to third
parties for infringing these rights, it could be required to pay
a substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing
technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or
services that use or contain the infringing intellectual
property. WebMD may be unable to develop non-infringing products
or services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all. WebMD may also be required to indemnify its
customers if they become subject to third-party claims relating
to intellectual property that WebMD licenses or otherwise
provides to them, which could be costly.
Acquisitions,
business combinations and other transactions may be difficult to
complete and, if completed, may have negative consequences for
WebMDs business and its security holders
WebMD has been built, in part, through acquisitions. WebMD
intends to continue to seek to acquire or to engage in business
combinations with companies engaged in complementary businesses.
In addition, WebMD may enter into joint ventures, strategic
alliances or similar arrangements with third parties. These
transactions may result in changes in the nature and scope of
WebMDs operations and changes in its financial condition.
WebMDs success in completing these types of transactions
will depend on, among other things, its ability to locate
suitable candidates and negotiate mutually acceptable terms with
them, and to obtain adequate financing. Significant competition
for these opportunities exists, which may increase the cost of
and decrease the opportunities for these types of transactions.
Financing for these transactions may come from several sources,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents on hand and marketable securities;
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the issuance of additional common stock, of
preferred stock, of convertible debt or of other securities.
|
The issuance of additional equity or debt securities could:
|
|
|
|
|
cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of
WebMDs stockholders at the time of the issuance;
|
|
|
|
cause substantial dilution of WebMDs earnings per share;
|
|
|
|
subject WebMD to the risks associated with increased leverage,
including a reduction in WebMDs ability to obtain
financing or an increase in the cost of any financing that it
obtains;
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
subject WebMD to restrictive covenants that could limit its
flexibility in conducting future business activities; and
|
|
|
|
adversely affect the prevailing market price for WebMDs
outstanding securities.
|
WebMD does not intend to seek security holder approval for any
such acquisition or security issuance unless required by
applicable law, regulation or the terms of then existing
securities.
WebMDs
business will suffer if it fails to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies or to assess the risks in
particular transactions
WebMD has in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire,
businesses, technologies, services, product lines and other
assets. The successful integration of the acquired businesses
and assets into WebMDs operations, on a cost-effective
basis, can be critical to its future performance. The amount and
timing of the expected benefits of any acquisition, including
potential synergies between WebMD and the acquired business, are
subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
WebMDs ability to maintain relationships with the
customers of the acquired business;
|
|
|
|
WebMDs ability to retain or replace key personnel;
|
|
|
|
potential conflicts in sponsor or advertising relationships or
in relationships with strategic partners;
|
|
|
|
WebMDs ability to coordinate organizations that are
geographically diverse and may have different business
cultures; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with regulatory requirements.
|
We cannot guarantee that any acquired businesses will be
successfully integrated with WebMDs operations in a timely
or cost-effective manner, or at all. Failure to successfully
integrate acquired businesses or to achieve anticipated
operating synergies, revenue enhancements or cost savings could
have a material adverse effect on WebMDs business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Although WebMDs management attempts to evaluate the risks
inherent in each transaction and to value acquisition candidates
appropriately, we cannot assure you that WebMD will properly
ascertain all such risks or that acquired businesses and assets
will perform as WebMD expects or enhance the value of WebMD as a
whole. In addition, acquired companies or businesses may have
larger than expected liabilities that are not covered by the
indemnification, if any, that WebMD is able to obtain from the
sellers.
WebMD
may not be able to raise additional funds when needed for its
business or to exploit opportunities
WebMDs future liquidity and capital requirements will
depend upon numerous factors, including the success of its
service offerings, market developments, and repurchases of its
common stock. WebMD may need to raise additional funds to
support expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and
services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire
complementary businesses or technologies or take advantage of
unanticipated opportunities. If required, WebMD may raise such
additional funds through public or private debt or equity
financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. There
can be no assurance that such financing will be available on
acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be
dilutive to WebMDs stockholders.
As widely reported, financial markets have been experiencing
extreme disruption recently, including volatility in the prices
of securities and severely diminished liquidity and availability
of credit. Until this disruption in the financial markets is
resolved, financing will be even more difficult to obtain on
acceptable terms and WebMD could be forced to cancel or delay
investments or transactions that it would otherwise have made.
46
Risks
Related to Porex
Risks related to Porex currently affect only holders of HLTH
Common Stock. If Porex is not sold prior to the closing of the
merger, the following risks would, following the closing, apply
to all holders of WebMD Common Stock (including both those who
held WebMD Class A Common Stock prior to the merger and
those who held HLTH Common Stock prior to the merger).
The
decision to sell Porex may have a negative impact on its
business
As a result of HLTHs announcement that it plans to divest
Porex, the financial results and operations of Porexs
business may be adversely affected by the diversion of
management resources to the sale process and by uncertainty
regarding the outcome of the process. For example, the
uncertainty of who will own the business in the future could
lead Porex to lose or fail to attract employees, customers or
business partners. Although HLTH has taken steps to address
these risks, there can be no assurance that any such losses or
distractions will not adversely affect the operations or
financial results of Porexs business.
Porexs
success depends upon demand for its products, which in some
cases ultimately depends upon end-user demand for the products
of Porexs customers
Demand for Porexs products may change materially as a
result of economic or market conditions and other trends that
affect the industries in which Porex participates. In addition,
because a significant portion of Porexs products are
components that are eventually integrated into or used with
products manufactured by customers for resale to end-users, the
demand for these product components is dependent on product
development cycles and marketing efforts of these other
manufacturers, as well as variations in their inventory levels,
which are factors that Porex is unable to control. Accordingly,
the amount of Porexs sales to manufacturer customers can
be difficult to predict and subject to wide
quarter-to-quarter
variances. Porexs sales to manufacturer customers that
sell products used by consumers have been adversely affected by
economic conditions during recent months. We cannot predict how
long that adverse effect will continue and it could, depending
on future economic conditions, become worse in future periods.
Porex
faces significant competition for its products
Porex operates in highly competitive markets. The competitors
for Porexs porous plastic products include other producers
of porous plastic materials, as well as companies that
manufacture and sell products made from materials other than
porous plastics that can be used for the same purposes as
Porexs products. For example, Porexs porous plastic
pen nibs compete with felt and fiber tips manufactured by a
variety of suppliers worldwide. Other Porex porous plastic
products compete, depending on the application, with membrane
material, porous metals, metal screens, fiberglass tubes,
pleated paper, resin-impregnated felt, ceramics and other
substances and devices. Porex also competes with in-house design
and manufacturing capabilities of its OEM customers. Some of
Porexs competitors may have greater financial, technical,
product development, marketing and other resources than Porex
does. We cannot provide assurance that Porex will be able to
compete successfully against these companies or against
particular products they provide or may provide in the future.
Porexs
product offerings must meet changing customer
requirements
Porexs products are, in general, used in applications that
are affected by technological change. To satisfy its customers,
Porex must develop and introduce, in a timely manner, products
that meet changing customer requirements at competitive prices.
To do this, Porex must:
|
|
|
|
|
develop new uses of existing porous plastics technologies and
applications;
|
|
|
|
innovate and develop new porous plastics technologies and
applications;
|
|
|
|
commercialize those technologies and applications;
|
|
|
|
manufacture at a cost that allows it to price its products
competitively;
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
manufacture and deliver its products in sufficient volumes and
on time;
|
|
|
|
accurately anticipate customer needs; and
|
|
|
|
differentiate its offerings from those of its competitors.
|
We cannot assure you that Porex will be able to develop new or
enhanced products or that, if it does, those products will
achieve market acceptance. If Porex does not introduce new
products in a timely manner and make enhancements to existing
products to meet the changing needs of its customers, some of
its products could become obsolete over time, in which case
Porexs customer relationships, revenue and operating
results would be negatively impacted.
Potential
new or enhanced Porex products may not achieve sufficient sales
to be profitable or justify the cost of their
development
Porex cannot be certain, when it engages in research and
development activities, whether potential new products or
product enhancements will be accepted by the customers for whom
they are intended. Achieving market acceptance for new or
enhanced products may require substantial marketing efforts and
expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand
by potential customers. In addition, sales and marketing efforts
with respect to these products may require the use of additional
resources for training the existing Porex sales forces and for
hiring and training additional salespersons. There can be no
assurance that the revenue opportunities from new or enhanced
products will justify amounts spent for their development and
marketing. In addition, there can be no assurance that any
pricing strategy that Porex implements for any new or enhanced
products will be economically viable or acceptable to the target
markets.
Porex
may not be able to source the raw materials it needs or may have
to pay more for those raw materials
Some of Porexs products require high-grade plastic resins
with specific properties as raw materials. While Porex has not
experienced any material difficulty in obtaining adequate
supplies of high-grade plastic resins that meet its
requirements, it relies on a limited number of sources for some
of these plastic resins. If Porex experiences a reduction or
interruption in supply from these sources, it may not be able to
access alternative sources of supply within a reasonable period
of time or at commercially reasonable rates, which could have a
material adverse effect on its business and financial results.
In addition, the prices of some of the raw materials that Porex
uses depend, to a great extent, on the price of petroleum. As a
result, increases in the price of petroleum could have an
adverse effect on Porexs margins and on the ability of
Porexs porous plastics products to compete with products
made from other raw materials.
Disruptions
in Porexs manufacturing operations could have a material
adverse effect on its business and financial
results
Any significant disruption in Porexs manufacturing
operations, including as a result of fire, power interruptions,
equipment malfunctions, labor disputes, material shortages,
earthquakes, floods, computer viruses, sabotage, terrorist acts
or other force majeure, could have a material adverse effect on
Porexs ability to deliver products to customers and,
accordingly, its financial results.
Porex
may not be able to keep third parties from using technology it
has developed
Porex uses proprietary technology for manufacturing its porous
plastics products and its success is dependent, to a significant
extent, on its ability to protect the proprietary and
confidential aspects of its technology. Although Porex owns
certain patents, it relies primarily on non-patented proprietary
manufacturing processes. To protect its proprietary processes,
Porex relies on a combination of trade secret laws, license
agreements, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions and
technical measures, including designing and manufacturing its
porous molding equipment and most of its molds in-house. Trade
secret laws do not afford the statutory exclusivity possible for
patented processes. There can be no assurance that the legal
protections
48
afforded to Porex or the steps taken by Porex will be adequate
to prevent misappropriation of its technology. In addition,
these protections do not prevent independent third-party
development of competitive products or services.
Third
parties may claim that Porex is infringing their intellectual
property, and it could suffer significant litigation or
licensing expenses or be prevented from providing certain
services, which may harm its business
Porex could be subject to claims that it is misappropriating or
infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of
others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be
expensive to defend and divert managements attention from
Porexs operations. If Porex becomes liable to third
parties for infringing these rights, it could be required to pay
a substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing
technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or
services that use or contain the infringing intellectual
property. Porex may be unable to develop non-infringing products
or services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all.
The
nature of Porexs products exposes it to product liability
claims that may not be adequately covered by indemnity
agreements or insurance
The products sold by Porex, whether sold directly to end-users
or sold to other manufacturers for inclusion in the products
that they sell, expose it to potential risk of product liability
claims, particularly with respect to Porexs life sciences,
clinical, surgical and medical products. In addition, Porex is
subject to the risk that a government authority or third party
may require it to recall one or more of its products. Some of
Porexs products are designed to be permanently implanted
in the human body. Design defects and manufacturing defects with
respect to such products sold by Porex or failures that occur
with the products of Porexs manufacturer customers that
contain components made by Porex could result in product
liability claims
and/or a
recall of one or more of Porexs products. Porex believes
that it carries adequate insurance coverage against product
liability claims and other risks. We cannot assure you, however,
that claims in excess of Porexs insurance coverage will
not arise. In addition, Porexs insurance policies must be
renewed annually. Although Porex has been able to obtain
adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost in the past,
we cannot assure you that Porex will continue to be able to
obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
In most instances, Porex has indemnity arrangements with its
manufacturing customers. These indemnity arrangements generally
provide that these customers would indemnify Porex from
liabilities that may arise from the sale of their products that
incorporate Porex components to, or the use of such products by,
end-users. While Porex generally seeks contractual
indemnification from its customers, any such indemnification is
limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the
indemnifying party. If Porex does not have adequate contractual
indemnification available, product liability claims, to the
extent not covered by insurance, could have a material adverse
effect on its business and its financial results.
Porexs
manufacturing and marketing of medical devices is subject to
extensive regulation by the FDA and its failure to meet
regulatory requirements could require it to pay fines, incur
other costs or close facilities
Porexs Surgical Products Group manufactures and markets
medical devices, such as reconstructive and aesthetic surgical
implants used in craniofacial applications and post-surgical
drains. In addition, Porex manufactures and markets blood serum
filters as a medical device for use in laboratory applications.
These products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA
under the FDC Act. The FDAs regulations govern, among
other things, product development, testing, manufacturing,
labeling, storage, premarket clearance (referred to as 510(k)
clearance), premarket approval (referred to as PMA approval),
advertising and promotion, and sales and distribution. In
addition, the Porex facilities and manufacturing techniques used
for manufacturing medical devices generally must conform to
standards that are established by the FDA and other government
agencies, including those of European and other foreign
governments. These regulatory agencies may conduct periodic
audits or inspections of such facilities or processes to monitor
Porexs compliance with
49
applicable regulatory standards. If the FDA finds that Porex has
failed to comply with applicable regulations, the agency can
institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, including:
warning letters or untitled letters; fines and civil penalties;
unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions;
delays in clearing or approving, or refusal to clear or approve,
products; withdrawal or suspension of approval of products;
product recall or seizure; orders for physician notification or
device repair, replacement or refund; interruption of
production; operating restrictions; injunctions; and criminal
prosecution. Any adverse action by an applicable regulatory
agency could impair Porexs ability to produce its medical
device products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order
to meet customer demands. Porex may also be required to bear
other costs or take other actions that may have a negative
impact on its future sales of such products and its ability to
generate profits.
Some
of the companies to which Porex supplies its products are
subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and their failure to
meet regulatory requirements could adversely affect Porexs
business
Some of Porexs customers are medical device manufacturers
that use Porex products to make finished medical devices of
their own. Those customers are subject to extensive regulation
by the FDA
and/or
equivalent foreign regulatory authorities. Those regulatory
agencies may conduct periodic audits or inspections of their
facilities to monitor their compliance with applicable
regulatory standards. If the FDA finds that a Porex
customers facility has failed to comply with applicable
regulations, the agency can institute, against such customer,
any of the enforcement actions identified in the risk factor
directly above regarding regulation of Porex. Any adverse action
by an applicable regulatory agency could impair the
customers ability to produce products and thus could
decrease demand for Porexs products or require Porex to
bear additional costs.
In addition, modifications to Porexs customers
products may require new regulatory approvals or clearances,
including 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals, or require
them to recall or cease marketing the modified devices until
these clearances or approvals are obtained. The FDA may not
approve or clear these product modifications for the indications
that are necessary or desirable for successful
commercialization. Indeed, the FDA may refuse Porexs
customers requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket
approval of new products, new intended uses or modifications to
existing products. Failure of such customers to receive
clearance or approval for new or modified products could reduce
or delay their purchases of Porexs products.
Economic,
political and other risks associated with Porexs
international sales and geographically diverse operations could
adversely affect Porexs operations and financial
results
Since Porex sells its products worldwide, its business is
subject to risks associated with doing business internationally.
In addition, Porex has manufacturing facilities in the United
Kingdom, Germany and Malaysia. Accordingly, Porexs
operations and financial results could be harmed by a variety of
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements;
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws;
|
|
|
|
differing protection of intellectual property rights in
different countries; and
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements.
|
Environmental
regulation could adversely affect Porexs
business
Porex is subject to foreign and domestic environmental laws and
regulations and is subject to scheduled and random checks by
environmental authorities. Porexs business involves the
handling, storage and disposal of materials that are classified
as hazardous. Although Porexs safety procedures for
handling, storage and disposal of these materials are designed
to comply with the standards prescribed by applicable laws and
regulations, Porex
50
may be held liable for any environmental damages that result
from Porexs operations. Porex may be required to pay
fines, remediation costs and damages, which could have a
material adverse effect on its results of operations.
Other
Risks Related to HLTH
The following risks related to HLTH currently affect only
holders of HLTH Common Stock. These risks would, following the
closing of the merger, apply to all holders of WebMD Common
Stock (including both those who held WebMD Class A Common
Stock prior to the merger and those who held HLTH Common Stock
prior to the merger).
The
ongoing investigations of HLTH by the United States Attorney for
the District of South Carolina and the SEC could negatively
impact the combined company after the merger and divert
management attention from business operations
The United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina is
conducting an investigation of our company. Based on the
information available to HLTH as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, we believe that the investigation relates
principally to issues of financial accounting improprieties for
Medical Manager Corporation, a predecessor of HLTH (by its
merger into HLTH in September 2000), and Medical Manager Health
Systems, a former subsidiary of HLTH; however, we cannot be sure
of the investigations exact scope or how long it may
continue. In addition, HLTH understands that the SEC is
conducting a formal investigation into this matter. Adverse
developments in connection with the investigations, if any,
including as a result of matters that the authorities or HLTH
may discover, could have a negative impact on our company and on
how it is perceived by investors and potential investors and
customers and potential customers. In addition, the management
effort and attention required to respond to the investigations
and any such developments could have a negative impact on our
business operations.
HLTH intends to continue to fully cooperate with the authorities
in this matter. We believe that the amount of the expenses that
we will incur in connection with the investigations will
continue to be significant and we are not able to determine, at
this time, what portion of those amounts may ultimately be
covered by insurance or may ultimately be repaid to us by
individuals to whom we are advancing amounts for their defense
costs. In connection with the sale of Emdeon Practice Services
to Sage Software, we have agreed to indemnify Sage Software with
respect to this matter.
Negative
conditions in the market for certain auction rate securities may
result in HLTH incurring a loss on such
investments
As of June 30, 2009, HLTH had a total of approximately
$353.9 million (face value) of investments in certain
auction rate securities (ARS), of which approximately
$163.9 million (face value) is attributable to WebMD. Those
ARS had a book value of $270.7 million as of June 30,
2009, of which $126.3 million is attributable to WebMD. The
types of ARS investments that HLTH owns are backed by student
loans, 97% of which are guaranteed under the Federal Family
Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of
AAA or Aaa when purchased. HLTH and its subsidiaries do not own
any other type of ARS investments.
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held
auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being
able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In
the event HLTH needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments, it
may not be able to do so until a future auction on these types
of investments is successful or until a buyer is found outside
the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling to
purchase the investments at their carrying amount, HLTH would
incur a loss on any such sales. In addition, the credit ratings
on some of the ARS investments in our portfolio have been
downgraded, and there may be additional such rating downgrades
in the future. If uncertainties in the credit and capital
markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or ARS
investments in our portfolio experience additional credit rating
downgrades, there could be further fair value adjustments or
other-than-temporary impairments in the carrying value of our
ARS investments.
51
Risks
Related to HLTHs Control of, and Existing Relationships
with, WebMD
The following risks currently affect holders of WebMD
Class A Common Stock. These risks would, following the
closing of the merger, cease to apply because HLTH would be
merged into WebMD and would no longer control it.
The
concentrated ownership of WebMD Common Stock by HLTH and certain
corporate governance arrangements prevent WebMDs other
stockholders from influencing significant corporate
decisions
WebMD currently has two classes of Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, which entitles the holder to one vote
per share on all matters submitted to stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock, which entitles the holder to five
votes per share on all matters submitted to stockholders.
|
HLTH owns 100% of WebMD Class B Common Stock, which
represents approximately 83.2% of WebMD outstanding Common
Stock. These Class B shares collectively represent
approximately 96% of the combined voting power of WebMD
outstanding Common Stock. Given its ownership interest, HLTH is
able to control the outcome of all matters submitted to WebMD
stockholders for approval, including the election of directors
and the merger (which HLTH has agreed, in the merger agreement,
to vote to approve), but not including any amendment to the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of WebMD, including by
merger, consolidation or otherwise, if such amendment would
adversely affect the rights, powers or preferences of the WebMD
Class A Common Stock. Accordingly, except as specifically
provided in the merger agreement, either in its capacity as a
stockholder or through its control of the WebMD Board of
Directors, HLTH is able to control all key decisions regarding
WebMD, including mergers or other business combinations and
acquisitions, dispositions of assets, future issuances of WebMD
Common Stock or other securities, the incurrence of debt by
WebMD, the payment of dividends on WebMD Common Stock (including
the frequency and the amount of dividends that would be payable
on WebMD Common Stock, a substantial majority of which HLTH
owns) and amendments to WebMDs certificate of
incorporation (other than amendments that would adversely affect
the rights, powers and preferences of the WebMD Class A
Common Stock) and bylaws. Further, as long as HLTH and its
subsidiaries (excluding WebMD and its subsidiaries) continue to
beneficially own shares representing at least a majority of the
votes entitled to be cast by the holders of WebMD outstanding
voting stock, it may take actions required to be taken at a
meeting of stockholders without a meeting or a vote and without
prior notice to holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. In
addition, HLTHs controlling interest may discourage a
change of control that the holders of WebMD Class A Common
Stock may favor. Any of these provisions could be used by HLTH
for its own advantage to the detriment of WebMD and its other
stockholders. This in turn may have an adverse effect on the
market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock.
In the merger, the certificate of incorporation of WebMD will be
amended and restated to eliminate the dual class structure of
the Common Stock and to increase the maximum number of shares of
Common Stock having a par value of $.01 per share from
500,000,000 shares to 650,000,000 shares. As a result
of the merger, existing shares of WebMDs Class B
Common Stock will be canceled. Existing shares of WebMDs
Class A Common Stock will remain outstanding as shares of
WebMD Common Stock. After the merger, WebMD Common Stock will
continue to be quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under
the symbol WBMD.
The
interests of HLTH may conflict with the interests of
WebMDs other stockholders
WebMD cannot assure you that the interests of HLTH will coincide
with the interests of the holders of WebMD Class A Common
Stock. For example, except as specifically provided in the
merger agreement, HLTH could cause WebMD to make acquisitions
that increase the amount of WebMDs indebtedness or
outstanding shares of Common Stock or sell revenue-generating
assets. Also, HLTH or its directors and officers may allocate to
HLTH or its other affiliates corporate opportunities that could
have been directed to
52
WebMD. So long as HLTH continues to own shares of WebMD Common
Stock with significant voting power, HLTH will continue to be
able to strongly influence or effectively control WebMDs
decisions.
Some
of WebMDs directors, officers and employees may have
potential conflicts of interest as a result of having positions
with or owning equity interests in HLTH
Martin J. Wygod, in addition to being Chairman of the Board of
WebMD, is Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive
Officer of HLTH. Some of WebMDs other directors, officers
and employees also serve as directors, officers or employees of
HLTH. In addition, some of WebMDs directors, officers and
employees own shares of HLTHs Common Stock. Furthermore,
because WebMDs officers and employees have participated in
HLTHs equity compensation plans and because service at
WebMD will, so long as it is a majority-owned subsidiary of
HLTH, qualify those persons for continued participation and
continued vesting of equity awards under HLTHs equity
plans, many of WebMDs officers and employees and some of
its directors hold, and may continue to hold, options to
purchase HLTHs Common Stock and shares of HLTHs
restricted stock.
These arrangements and ownership interests or cash- or
equity-based awards could create, or appear to create, potential
conflicts of interest when WebMDs directors or officers
who own HLTHs stock or stock options or who participate in
HLTHs benefit plans are faced with decisions that could
have different implications for HLTH than they do for WebMD.
WebMD cannot assure you that the provisions in WebMDs
restated certificate of incorporation will adequately address
potential conflicts of interest or that potential conflicts of
interest will be resolved in WebMDs favor.
Provisions
in WebMDs organizational documents and Delaware law may
inhibit a takeover, which could adversely affect the value of
WebMD Class A Common Stock
WebMDs certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as
Delaware corporate law, contain provisions that could delay or
prevent a change of control or changes in management and the
Board of Directors that holders of WebMD Class A Common
Stock might consider favorable and may prevent them from
receiving a takeover premium for their shares. These provisions
include, for example, WebMDs classified board structure,
the disproportionate voting rights of the WebMD Class B
Common Stock (relative to the WebMD Class A Common Stock)
and the authorization of the Board of Directors to issue up to
50 million shares of Preferred Stock without a stockholder
vote. In addition, WebMDs Restated Certificate of
Incorporation provides that after the time HLTH and its
affiliates cease to own, in the aggregate, a majority of the
combined voting power of WebMDs outstanding capital stock,
stockholders may not act by written consent and may not call
special meetings. These provisions apply even if the offer may
be considered beneficial by some of WebMDs stockholders.
If a change of control or change in management is delayed or
prevented, the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock
could decline.
In the merger, the certificate of incorporation of WebMD will be
amended and restated, which we refer to as the Amended WebMD
Charter, to eliminate the dual class structure of WebMDs
Common Stock. The Amended WebMD Charter will continue to provide
that WebMD shall have a classified board structure and that
stockholders may not act by written consent or call a special
meeting.
53
THE
MERGER
Background
of the Merger
In 2007, HLTHs Board of Directors initiated a process of
considering various strategic alternatives to enhance
shareholder value. Because it believed that the primary reason
of many of the holders of HLTH Common Stock for owning those
shares was HLTHs controlling interest in WebMD, the HLTH
board eventually chose to focus on a transaction structure that
would allow the HLTH stockholders to directly participate in the
ownership of WebMD, while also reducing the capitalization of
WebMD and unlocking the value of certain other non-core assets
HLTH held at the time.
On February 20, 2008, HLTH and WebMD entered into a merger
agreement (which we refer to as the 2008 Merger Agreement),
pursuant to which HLTH would merge into WebMD (which we refer to
as the Proposed 2008 Merger), with WebMD continuing as the
surviving corporation. Pursuant to the Proposed 2008 Merger,
each share of HLTH Common Stock would be converted into a
combination of WebMD Common Stock and cash (and, in certain
circumstances, a portion of the cash would be replaced by notes
to be issued by WebMD).
The 2008 Merger Agreement resulted from extensive negotiations
from October 2007 to February 2008 between HLTH and a special
committee of the Board of Directors of WebMD (which we refer to
as the 2008 Special Committee) and comprehensive due diligence
by the 2008 Special Committee and its advisors with respect to
HLTH. The 2008 Special Committee consisted of Stanley S.
Trotman, Jr. and Jerome Keller, two independent members of
the WebMD Board of Directors who were not on the HLTH Board of
Directors, with Mr. Trotman appointed as its Chairman.
In connection with the Proposed 2008 Merger, HLTH retained
OMelveny & Myers LLP as outside counsel to HLTH
and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (which we refer
to as Raymond James) to serve as its financial advisor. Raymond
James is a nationally recognized investment banking services
firm that regularly undertakes the valuation of investment
securities in connection with public offerings, private
placements, business combinations, and similar transactions.
The 2008 Special Committee conducted a process of selecting
independent legal and financial advisors, through which it
retained Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP (which we refer
to as Cahill) to serve as its legal counsel, Abrams &
Laster LLP (which we refer to as Abrams & Laster) to
serve as its special Delaware counsel and Morgan
Joseph & Co. Inc. (which we refer to as Morgan Joseph)
to serve as its financial advisor with respect to the Proposed
2008 Merger. Morgan Joseph is a full service investment banking
firm dedicated to serving middle market companies, with
expertise in providing mergers and acquisitions advice,
restructuring advice, private placements and public offering of
debt and equity.
On August 26, 2008, in connection with the Proposed 2008
Merger, WebMD filed a joint proxy statement/prospectus on
Form S-4
with the SEC. On October 14, 2008, WebMD filed an amended
joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC. A further
description of the background of the Proposed 2008 Merger can be
found in that joint proxy statement/prospectus, as amended.
On October 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of a termination
agreement (which we refer to as the Termination Agreement), HLTH
and WebMD mutually agreed, in light of the turmoil in financial
markets and the decline in the price of both HLTH Common Stock
and WebMD Common Stock, to terminate the 2008 Merger Agreement.
The Termination Agreement was unanimously approved by the 2008
Special Committee and by the boards of directors of WebMD and
HLTH. The boards of directors concluded that, by terminating the
2008 Merger Agreement, HLTH and WebMD would retain financial
flexibility and be in a position to pursue potential acquisition
opportunities expected to be available to companies with
significant cash resources in a period of financial market
uncertainty. See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions of HLTH Termination Agreement.
In May 2009, representatives of HLTH met telephonically with
representatives of WebMD and a member of the WebMD Board of
Directors who had served on the 2008 Special Committee. During
this call, HLTH informed WebMD of its interest in exploring the
possibility of a potential transaction involving the
54
combination of HLTH and WebMD into one company. Representatives
of HLTH discussed a transaction that would take the form of an
all-stock, tax-free direct merger of HLTH and WebMD, with WebMD
surviving the merger. Further, representatives of HLTH discussed
the key goals for such a transaction, which included, among
other things, allowing HLTHs stockholders to participate
more directly in the ownership of WebMD commensurately with
HLTHs ownership interest in WebMD prior to the merger and
reducing the expenses associated with maintaining two separate
public companies, while eliminating HLTHs controlling
interest in WebMD and enhancing the liquidity of WebMD Common
Stock. HLTH indicated that it was interested in negotiating
terms for such a transaction that would be fair to HLTH and its
stockholders and also fair to WebMD Class A Common
stockholders.
On May 21, 2009, the WebMD Board of Directors met
telephonically. At this meeting, the WebMD Board of Directors
discussed the conversation among representatives of HLTH, WebMD
and the WebMD Board of Directors regarding a potential merger
between HLTH and WebMD. Following that discussion, the WebMD
Board of Directors formed a special committee (which we refer to
as the WebMD Special Committee) consisting of Mr. Keller
and Mr. Trotman, the two directors who served on the 2008
Special Committee, each of whom is an independent member of the
WebMD Board of Directors and is not on the HLTH Board of
Directors, to consider a potential transaction with HLTH. The
WebMD Special Committee was vested with the power to, among
other things, retain independent legal and financial advisors
and to review and negotiate the terms and conditions of a
potential transaction with HLTH on behalf of the holders of
WebMD Common Stock other than HLTH and the officers and
directors of HLTH, WebMD and their respective affiliates (who we
refer to as the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders). The WebMD
Board of Directors also directed WebMDs management to
fully support and cooperate with the WebMD Special Committee.
The WebMD Special Committee appointed Mr. Trotman as its
Chairman.
On May 21, 2009, HLTH retained Shearman &
Sterling LLP (which we refer to as Shearman) as outside counsel
to HLTH to advise it in connection with its discussions with
WebMD regarding a potential transaction.
On May 28, 2009, representatives of HLTH contacted
representatives of Raymond James to advise Raymond James that
the WebMD Special Committee had been formed and that, based on
the terms of the engagement letter between HLTH and Raymond
James for the Proposed 2008 Merger, HLTHs retention of
Raymond James as a financial advisor continued to apply. From
May 28, 2009 through delivery of its fairness opinion on
June 17, 2009, Raymond James, pursuant to oral and written
communications, requested and received from HLTH updated due
diligence information, schedules and analyses. Raymond James
also requested and received copies of the information supplied
by HLTH and WebMD to the WebMD Special Committee.
During the week of May 25, 2009, the WebMD Special
Committee selected independent legal and financial advisors.
Based, among other reasons, on their familiarity with the issues
that would be involved in a potential merger between HLTH and
WebMD from their previous experience in representing the 2008
Special Committee, the WebMD Special Committee retained Cahill
to serve as its legal counsel, Abrams & Laster to
serve as its special Delaware counsel and Morgan Joseph to serve
as its financial advisor.
During the week of May 25, 2009, the WebMD Special
Committee and its representatives and representatives of the
WebMD senior management team met telephonically on various
occasions to discuss the due diligence review that would be
required in connection with a possible transaction.
On June 2, 2009, representatives of Morgan Joseph provided
a written due diligence request list to HLTH setting forth
specific requests for information concerning the finances,
business and operations of HLTH and WebMD and HLTHs
ongoing efforts to sell Porex.
During the first week of June 2009, Cahill and Morgan Joseph,
with the cooperation of HLTH representatives, conducted a
significant portion of the due diligence required for the WebMD
Special Committee to evaluate a new merger proposal, including
confirming and updating the due diligence that was conducted in
connection with the Proposed 2008 Merger. Contacts between
representatives and advisors of HLTH regarding such
investigation continued throughout the period in which
discussions regarding a potential merger were being held between
HLTH and the WebMD Special Committee and involved
representatives of HLTH, WebMD and their respective advisors.
55
On June 9, 2009, the HLTH Board of Directors met
telephonically. Also in attendance were representatives of the
senior management team of HLTH and representatives of Shearman
and Raymond James. At this meeting, representatives of
HLTHs senior management team updated the HLTH Board of
Directors on the status of the discussions with WebMD regarding
the proposed merger. Also at this meeting, representatives of
HLTH management advised the Board that HLTH management was
considering the following structure for a potential transaction
between HLTH and WebMD:
|
|
|
|
|
a direct merger of HLTH into WebMD, with WebMD being the
surviving corporation;
|
|
|
|
in the merger, HLTH Common Stock would be converted into WebMD
Common Stock based upon a fixed exchange ratio; and
|
|
|
|
WebMD stockholders, other than HLTH, would continue to own their
shares of WebMD Common Stock following the merger and
WebMDs dual class stock structure would be eliminated.
|
Upon completion of the transaction, WebMD would assume
HLTHs outstanding options and convertible notes, with
customary adjustments to reflect the effect of the exchange
ratio in the proposed merger.
The representatives of HLTH management indicated that it was
HLTHs goal to propose a transaction that would be fair to
both HLTH stockholders and to the holders of WebMD Class A
Common Stock. They then described certain of the objectives and
benefits of such a transaction to stockholders of HLTH,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
allowing HLTH stockholders to have direct ownership in WebMD in
an amount commensurate with their ownership interest in WebMD
prior to the merger through a tax-free transaction;
|
|
|
|
eliminating inefficiencies associated with having two separate
public companies and managing intercompany affairs; and
|
|
|
|
increasing WebMDs ability to raise capital, to obtain
financing and to use its equity securities to make acquisitions;
|
They noted that the last point would also benefit holders of
WebMD Class A Common Stock and that there would be other
benefits to holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing the public float and liquidity of WebMD
shares; and
|
|
|
|
eliminating the controlling block of WebMD shares held by HLTH.
|
HLTH management indicated that it expected to propose to the
WebMD Special Committee a transaction having the structure
described above and an exchange ratio that would reflect
HLTHs existing ownership interest in WebMD, increased by
an amount to reflect HLTHs views regarding the net assets
of HLTH (other than its ownership interest in WebMD) that would
be acquired by WebMD in the merger. The HLTH Board of Directors
was not asked to approve specific terms for such a transaction
at that time, but did direct HLTH management to negotiate with
the WebMD Special Committee regarding a proposed transaction
having the structure discussed at this meeting.
On June 11, 2009, representatives of HLTH and its financial
and legal advisors met telephonically with the WebMD Special
Committee and its financial and legal advisors as well as
representatives of WebMD management. During this call,
representatives of HLTH management outlined HLTHs proposed
terms for the merger. Under HLTHs proposal, HLTH would be
merged with and into WebMD in a tax-free transaction in which
each share of HLTH Common Stock would be converted into
0.4507 shares of WebMD Common Stock. The proposed 0.4507
exchange ratio was equal to the sum of 0.4444, which was the
per-HLTH-share amount of the WebMD Common Stock owned by HLTH,
plus 0.0063 (which we refer to as the Incremental Exchange
Ratio), which represented the value of the net assets (other
than HLTHs ownership of WebMD) that would be acquired by
WebMD in the merger attributable to the holders of WebMD Common
Stock other than HLTH.
Immediately following the telephone conference, Shearman, on
behalf of HLTH, delivered a term sheet to the WebMD Special
Committee and its legal and financial advisors summarizing
HLTHs proposed terms of
56
the merger between HLTH and WebMD. Later that day, Shearman, on
behalf of HLTH, delivered a draft of the merger agreement for
the proposed merger between HLTH and WebMD to the WebMD Special
Committee and its legal and financial advisors for their review
and consideration. Except as required to reflect the financial
terms contained in the term sheet, the draft merger agreement
prepared by HLTH was based on the 2008 Merger Agreement,
containing similar representations, warranties, covenants and
other terms and conditions.
On June 12, 2009, the Board of Directors of HLTH met
telephonically to receive a status update from HLTH management
and its legal and financial advisors about the proposed merger.
At that meeting, HLTH management reported on the meeting of
June 11, 2009 and discussed the expected next steps for the
proposed merger.
On June 12, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee met
telephonically with Cahill, Abrams & Laster and Morgan
Joseph to discuss HLTHs proposal. Among the topics
discussed were the incremental assets to be received by WebMD in
the merger, consisting of HLTHs cash and investments
(including ARS), its NOL carryforwards and Porex, and the
incremental liabilities WebMD would assume, consisting of
HLTHs convertible notes, certain tax liabilities,
contingent liabilities and severance costs and other expenses
relating to the transaction. The WebMD Special Committee also
discussed HLTHs ongoing efforts to sell Porex and matters
relating to the valuation of the ARS. The WebMD Special
Committees advisors said they were continuing their due
diligence and analysis and would be in a position to report
their conclusions the following week. In the days thereafter,
the WebMD Special Committees advisors finalized their due
diligence.
Throughout the week of June 15, 2009, representatives of
HLTH, the WebMD Special Committee, Shearman and Cahill had
telephonic conferences to discuss the terms of the proposed
merger agreement and related documentation. In connection with
these discussions, the parties exchanged multiple drafts of the
proposed merger agreement and related documentation. Each of
HLTHs and WebMDs senior management teams met
regularly with their respective advisors to receive an update on
the status of the negotiations, review issues and concerns that
arose during negotiations and provide direction and instruction
to their advisors.
On the afternoon of June 17, 2009, the WebMD Special
Committee met telephonically with Cahill and Morgan Joseph to
discuss HLTHs proposal. Morgan Joseph reviewed its
analysis of the incremental assets and liabilities to be assumed
by WebMD in the merger and Cahill described the terms of the
draft merger agreement. Among the topics discussed were the
benefit of removing WebMDs controlling stockholder, which
would allow the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders to participate
in any future control premium for WebMD, the risks associated
with acquiring Porex in the merger, the potential dilutive
effect of the merger on WebMDs earnings and EBITDA and the
potential dilution of the ownership of the unaffiliated WebMD
stockholders from WebMDs assumption of HLTHs options
and convertible notes. At the conclusion of the meeting, the
WebMD Special Committee authorized Cahill to communicate a
counter-proposal to HLTH which included, among other things, the
elimination of the Incremental Exchange Ratio and a condition
that the merger be approved by a majority of the unaffiliated
WebMD stockholders.
Immediately following the meeting, Cahill, on behalf of the
WebMD Special Committee, delivered the WebMD Special
Committees counter-proposal to HLTH and its advisors.
Later that day, in response to the WebMD Special
Committees counter-proposal, HLTH met telephonically with
its legal and financial advisors.
On the evening of June 17, 2009, HLTH and its legal and
financial advisors met telephonically with the WebMD Special
Committee and its legal and financial advisors. HLTH stated that
it would be willing to proceed with the merger without an
Incremental Exchange Ratio and to instead use a fixed exchange
ratio of 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock for each share
of HLTH Common Stock, but that it would not be willing to
proceed with a transaction conditioned on approval by a majority
of unaffiliated WebMD stockholders because, in light of the
small public float of WebMDs Class A Common Stock,
the requirement for such a vote could permit the holders of a
relatively small number of shares to block the merger. Following
these meetings, representatives of HLTH contacted Cahill to
discuss a proposed resolution of the remaining open issues under
the draft merger agreement.
57
After receiving HLTHs counter-proposal, the WebMD Special
Committee met telephonically with its advisors to discuss
HLTHs proposal and determined, in light of the benefits of
the transaction and concessions that HLTH had agreed to on the
other issues, to move forward with the merger on the basis
proposed by HLTH. The WebMD Special Committee then instructed
Cahill to communicate to Shearman that the WebMD Special
Committee had accepted HLTHs latest proposal and
instructed Morgan Joseph to prepare its fairness opinion with
respect to the merger consideration to be paid in the merger
based upon the agreed terms.
On the evening of June 17, 2009, the HLTH Board of
Directors met telephonically. Representatives of Shearman and
Raymond James and HLTHs senior management team also
participated in this meeting. Representatives of HLTHs
senior management team updated the HLTH Board of Directors on
negotiations with WebMD since the previous meeting.
Representatives of Shearman reviewed the fiduciary duties of the
directors in connection with the HLTH Board of Directors
consideration of the proposed merger with WebMD and described
the principal terms of the proposed merger agreement and related
transactions. Representatives of Raymond James made a
presentation regarding the financial analysis it had performed
in respect of HLTH and WebMD, and described the fairness opinion
it was prepared to deliver to the HLTH Board of Directors if
requested. Extended discussion followed among the directors and
their advisors, with numerous questions addressed by the HLTH
Board of Directors regarding the draft merger agreement, the
terms of the proposed transaction and the process between the
signing of definitive agreements and the closing of the
transaction. Following these discussions, Raymond James
delivered an oral opinion, confirmed by a subsequent written
opinion dated June 17, 2009, that the exchange ratio
contemplated by the merger agreement would be fair to holders of
HLTH Common Stock from a financial point of view, subject to the
assumptions, qualifications and limitations contained in its
written opinion. After considering both factors supporting the
proposed merger and factors weighing against it (as more fully
described below under HLTHs Purposes and
Reasons for the Merger), the members of the HLTH Board of
Directors then unanimously:
|
|
|
|
|
determined that the terms of the merger agreement and the
proposed transaction were substantively and procedurally fair
to, and in the best interests of, HLTH and the holders of HLTH
Common Stock, as well as being substantively and procedurally
fair to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
declared the merger agreement advisable, approved and adopted
the merger agreement and authorized and approved the proposed
merger; and
|
|
|
|
recommended that holders of HLTH Common Stock approve and adopt
the merger agreement and approve the proposed merger.
|
Also on the evening of June 17, 2009, the WebMD Special
Committee met telephonically with its advisors. Representatives
of Morgan Joseph reviewed with the members of the WebMD Special
Committee their presentation and valuation analysis, copies of
which had been previously provided to them, and delivered Morgan
Josephs opinion, subject to the assumptions,
qualifications and limitations contained therein, that the
consideration to be paid to the stockholders of HLTH in the
proposed transaction was fair, from a financial point of view,
to unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. Representatives of Cahill
then reviewed the merger agreement with the members of the WebMD
Special Committee. After considering the factors weighing in
favor or against the proposed transaction, including certain
intangible benefits beyond the scope of Morgan Josephs
valuation analysis, the members of the WebMD Special Committee
concluded that, on balance, they favored the proposed
transaction. For a discussion of the factors considered, see
WebMDs Purposes and Reasons for the
Merger. At the end of the meeting, the WebMD Special
Committee unanimously:
|
|
|
|
|
determined that the terms of the merger agreement and the
proposed transaction were substantively and procedurally fair
to, and in the best interests of, WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
approved the merger agreement and the proposed merger;
|
|
|
|
recommended that the WebMD Board of Directors approve the merger
agreement and the proposed merger; and
|
|
|
|
recommended that the stockholders of WebMD adopt the merger
agreement and approve the proposed merger.
|
58
Shortly after the WebMD Special Committee meeting, a telephonic
meeting of the WebMD Board of Directors was held to consider the
proposed transaction. At that meeting, the WebMD Special
Committee summarized for the WebMD Board of Directors the work
it and its advisors had done regarding the transaction. The
WebMD Special Committee informed the WebMD Board of Directors of
the opinion it had received from Morgan Joseph and the
conclusions and recommendations of the WebMD Special Committee
regarding the transaction, as described above. Based on the
recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee, the WebMD Board
of Directors unanimously:
|
|
|
|
|
determined that the terms of the merger agreement and the
proposed transaction were substantively and procedurally fair
to, and in the best interests of, WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
declared the merger agreement advisable, approved and adopted
the merger agreement and authorized and approved the proposed
merger; and
|
|
|
|
recommended that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock
approve and adopt the merger agreement and approve the proposed
merger.
|
Following the approval by the boards of directors of WebMD and
HLTH, the merger agreement was executed and delivered by the
respective parties on the evening of June 17, 2009 and the
transaction was publicly announced prior to the opening of the
financial markets on June 18, 2009.
HLTHs
Purposes and Reasons for the Merger
As discussed above in Background of the
Merger, the HLTH Board of Directors proposed the merger
with WebMD to simplify the corporate structure of the two
companies, in a transaction that would be fair to both the
stockholders of HLTH and the holders of Class A Common
Stock of WebMD. The HLTH Board believed that there were no
longer any significant advantages in maintaining a separate
public company above WebMD, since HLTHs only remaining
other business is Porex, which it is in the process of
divesting. In determining the fairness of the merger and
unanimously approving the merger agreement and the merger, the
HLTH Board of Directors considered a number of factors which, in
the opinion of the HLTH Board of Directors, supported the
merger, including:
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the transaction, HLTH stockholders would have
direct ownership of shares of WebMD, with the exchange ratio of
0.4444 resulting in the ownership stake of HLTH stockholders in
the combined company being, in the aggregate, substantially the
same as HLTHs ownership interest in WebMD prior to the
merger, after taking into consideration dilution from certain
outstanding options and shares of restricted stock.
|
|
|
|
The expectation that the WebMD Common Stock would be received by
the HLTH stockholders on a tax-free basis.
|
|
|
|
WebMD Common Stock as the merger consideration enables HLTH
stockholders to continue to benefit from future growth in
WebMDs businesses, as well as from any increase in the
value of the net assets of HLTH, other than its ownership
interest in WebMD, which will be owned by the combined company
following the merger.
|
|
|
|
The WebMD Common Stock to be received by the HLTH stockholders
is expected to have similar liquidity to existing HLTH Common
Stock and greater liquidity than WebMD Class A Common Stock has
prior to the merger.
|
|
|
|
The expectation that the merger would increase WebMDs
ability to raise capital and obtain financing.
|
|
|
|
The merger will eliminate inefficiencies associated with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
managing intercompany affairs between HLTH and WebMD; and
|
|
|
|
having two separate public companies, with separate shareholder
bases;
|
59
although, in compliance with applicable financial reporting
standards, such efficiencies will not be reflected in the pro
forma financial statements included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the sale of Porex and the merger, corporate
overhead would be reduced to reflect the size required to
service the surviving companys operations and to reflect
the elimination of one of the two public companies currently
being maintained.
|
|
|
|
The high likelihood of closing the proposed transaction.
|
|
|
|
The financial presentation of Raymond James to the HLTH Board of
Directors on June 17, 2009, including Raymond Jamess
opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the exchange ratio for the proposed merger, subject to the
assumptions, qualifications and limitations contained in its
written opinion. Raymond Jamess opinion is described under
the heading Opinion of HLTHs Financial
Advisor, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
The HLTH Board of Directors also considered a variety of risks
and other potentially negative factors concerning the merger.
The material risks and potentially negative factors considered
by the HLTH Board of Directors were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The consummation of the merger would result in the elimination
of the opportunity to receive, through a sale to a third party,
a control premium on HLTHs interest in WebMD that would
not be shared with the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
|
|
|
|
The fact that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will
have the benefit of the combined company receiving the net
assets of HLTH, other than its ownership interest in WebMD, the
value of which may increase following the merger, a portion of
which would then be shared with the holders of WebMD
Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
While HLTH expects to complete the merger, there can be no
assurances that all conditions to the parties obligations
to complete the merger agreement will be satisfied and, as a
result, the merger may not be completed. In addition, if the
merger is not completed, HLTH would pay the expenses of both
parties.
|
|
|
|
The fact that certain of HLTHs directors and executive
officers have interests in connection with the merger that are
different from, or in addition to, the interests of HLTHs
stockholders generally (for further information, see
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger).
|
|
|
|
The restrictions on the conduct of HLTHs business prior to
completion of the merger, requiring HLTH to conduct its business
only in the ordinary course, subject to specific limitations,
which may delay or prevent HLTH from undertaking business
opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
The substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the
merger, including the transaction expenses arising from the
merger, as well as certain severance payments that may be
required to be made to officers and other employees of HLTH.
|
|
|
|
Each of the factors described above in Risk
Factors Risks Related to the Merger for Holders of
HLTH Common Stock.
|
The HLTH Board of Directors concluded, however, that these risks
and potentially negative factors were outweighed by the
potential benefits of the merger.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered and given weight by the HLTH board in connection with
the fairness of the merger to the stockholders of HLTH is not
intended to be exhaustive but is believed to include all
material factors considered by the HLTH board. The HLTH board
did not find it practicable to assign, and did not assign,
relative weights to the individual factors considered in
reaching its conclusions as to the fairness of the proposed
merger to the HLTH stockholders. Rather, its fairness
determination was made after consideration of all of the
foregoing factors as a whole.
60
Recommendation
of the HLTH Board of Directors
On June 17, 2009, the HLTH Board of Directors, after
carefully considering the factors described above, including the
fairness opinion of Raymond James to the HLTH Board of
Directors, unanimously determined that the merger is advisable,
procedurally and substantively fair to and in the best interests
of HLTH and its stockholders and approved the merger, the merger
agreement and each of the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the submission of the merger agreement to the HLTH
stockholders for adoption.
WebMDs
Purposes and Reasons for the Merger
Because a transaction involving the combination of HLTH and
WebMD would have the effect of eliminating HLTHs
controlling interest in WebMD and enhance the liquidity of WebMD
Common Stock by significantly increasing the public float, the
WebMD Board of Directors determined to evaluate any proposal for
such a transaction and appointed a special committee of
independent directors to negotiate the terms of and recommend
the approval of any potential transaction. Following such
negotiations, the WebMD Special Committee and the WebMD Board of
Directors concluded that the transaction was in the best
interests of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. In
determining the fairness of the merger and unanimously
recommending approval of the merger agreement and the merger to
the WebMD Board of Directors, the WebMD Special Committee also
considered a number of factors which, in the opinion of the
members of the WebMD Special Committee, supported the WebMD
Special Committees recommendation, including:
|
|
|
|
|
By removing HLTH as WebMDs controlling stockholder,
WebMDs stockholders will be able to participate in any
premium from a
change-of-control
transaction.
|
|
|
|
By significantly increasing its public float, the merger should
enhance the liquidity of WebMDs common stock.
|
|
|
|
The merger will simplify corporate ownership structure and
increase transparency for investors.
|
|
|
|
The merger should improve how WebMD is perceived by investors
and increase WebMDs ability to raise capital and obtain
financing.
|
|
|
|
The merger will eliminate management and board of director
inefficiencies associated with managing current intercompany
affairs and will allow them to devote their full attention to
the growth of WebMDs business.
|
|
|
|
The expectation that the merger will qualify as a reorganization
for United States federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
The fact that, under the terms of the merger agreement, WebMD
(with the approval of the WebMD Special Committee) may terminate
the merger agreement if the WebMD Special Committee determines
in good faith, after consultation with its legal counsel, that
it is required by its fiduciary duties to terminate the merger
agreement in order to enter into a definitive agreement with
respect to a superior proposal.
|
|
|
|
All expenses incurred by either party and the WebMD Special
Committee in connection with the merger and any related
transactions will be paid by HLTH.
|
The WebMD Special Committee also considered a variety of risks
and other potentially negative factors concerning the merger.
The material risks and potentially negative factors considered
by the WebMD Special Committee were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
By agreeing to acquire Porex in light of HLTHs continuing
efforts to sell it, WebMD is assuming the divestiture risk with
respect to a non-core, slower-growth business and such
divestiture will continue to require the attention of management.
|
|
|
|
Retaining Porex could cause WebMD to be viewed by securities
analysts as no longer being a pure play internet
company, particularly if WebMD is required to stop treating
Porex as a discontinued
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
operation, which could have adverse consequences for the
valuation multiple at which WebMDs stock trades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the merger, the ownership of the unaffiliated WebMD
stockholders in WebMD will be subject to dilution from the
exercise of HLTHs stock options and convertible notes that
will be assumed by WebMD.
|
|
|
|
The issuance of a significant amount of WebMD Common Stock into
the markets, as would happen in the merger, could cause a
decline in its price and the increased size of WebMDs
public float thereafter could adversely affect the price at
which it trades, to the extent it has been supported by a
scarcity premium, as some analysts have speculated.
|
|
|
|
Following the merger, the combined company is expected to
initially have slightly higher corporate overhead expenses than
WebMD currently has, which could affect the trading price of
WebMD Common Stock after the merger.
|
|
|
|
Delays or difficulties in eliminating certain redundant costs of
the two companies could reduce earnings beyond the anticipated
slight increase in corporate overhead costs.
|
|
|
|
The closing prices of WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common
Stock on June 17, 2009, the date the merger agreement was
executed, were $28.21 and $11.76, respectively. The merger
consideration had a value on such date of $12.54 per HLTH share,
representing a premium of approximately 6.6% over the $11.76
closing price of HLTH Common Stock, which is higher than the
premiums in certain other controlling-stockholder transactions.
|
|
|
|
WebMD stockholders will be subject to risks related to any
litigation pending against HLTH.
|
|
|
|
The fact that certain of WebMDs directors and executive
officers have interests in connection with the merger that are
different from, or in addition to, the interests of WebMD
stockholders generally (for further information, see
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger).
|
|
|
|
The restrictions on the conduct of WebMDs business prior
to completion of the merger, requiring WebMD to conduct its
business only in the ordinary course, subject to specific
limitations, which may delay or prevent WebMD from undertaking
business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the
merger.
|
|
|
|
The costs to be incurred by WebMD following the merger,
including certain severance payments that may be required to be
made to officers and other employees of HLTH.
|
|
|
|
The risk that anticipated cost savings and other benefits sought
in the merger might not be fully realized.
|
|
|
|
Each of the factors described above in Risk
Factors Risks Related to the Merger for Holders of
WebMD Class A Common Stock.
|
The WebMD Special Committee concluded, however, that these risks
and potentially negative factors were outweighed by the
potential benefits of the merger.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered and given weight by the WebMD Special Committee in
connection with the fairness of the merger to the stockholders
of WebMD is not intended to be exhaustive but is believed to
include all material factors considered by the WebMD Special
Committee. The WebMD Special Committee did not find it
practicable to assign, and did not assign, relative weights to
the individual factors considered in reaching its conclusions as
to the fairness of the proposed merger to unaffiliated WebMD
stockholders. Rather, its fairness determination was made after
consideration of all of the foregoing factors as a whole.
In addition to determining that the merger is advisable and in
the best interests of WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD stockholders,
the WebMD Special Committee determined that the transaction was
procedurally and substantively fair to unaffiliated WebMD
stockholders, despite the fact that a majority vote of
unaffiliated WebMD stockholders is not a condition to the
merger. HLTH opposed making the merger
62
contingent on such a vote because, in light of the small public
float of WebMDs Class A Common Stock, the requirement
for such a vote could permit the holders of a relatively small
number of shares to block the merger. The WebMD Special
Committee believes that a number of factors support the
determination of procedural and substantive fairness to WebMD
and unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The unanimous recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee in
favor of the merger and related transactions in light of
(i) the composition of the two-member non-employee WebMD
Special Committee, each of whom the WebMD Board of Directors had
previously determined were unaffiliated with HLTH and
(ii) the review of HLTHs business, assets,
liabilities and financial condition by the WebMD Special
Committees financial advisors.
|
|
|
|
The WebMD Special Committee retained its own nationally
recognized legal advisor, Cahill, which the WebMD Special
Committee determined had no relationship creating a potential
conflict.
|
|
|
|
The WebMD Special Committee retained its own nationally
recognized financial advisor, Morgan Joseph, which the WebMD
Special Committee determined had no relationships that would
compromise its independence.
|
|
|
|
The financial presentation of Morgan Joseph to the WebMD Special
Committee on June 17, 2009 and its opinion addressed to the
WebMD Special Committee that the merger consideration to be paid
by WebMD to HLTH stockholders in the merger was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
Morgan Josephs opinion is described in detail under the
heading Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD
Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration and other terms and conditions of the
merger agreement were the result of negotiations between HLTH
and the WebMD Special Committee and their respective financial
and legal advisors following thorough due diligence.
|
|
|
|
The WebMD Special Committee had the exclusive authority to
negotiate the terms of the merger on behalf of WebMD.
|
|
|
|
The WebMD Special Committee had the power to reject the proposed
transaction and the resolutions establishing the WebMD Special
Committee provided that the WebMD Board of Directors would not
approve any strategic transaction with HLTH without the prior,
favorable recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee.
|
|
|
|
WebMDs business, financial strength and prospects made it
viable as a stand-alone entity.
|
|
|
|
The HLTH Board of Directors did not participate in or have any
influence over the conclusion reached by the WebMD Special
Committee or the negotiating positions of the WebMD Special
Committee.
|
Recommendations
of the WebMD Special Committee and the Board of
Directors
The WebMD Special Committee oversaw the performance of financial
and legal due diligence by its advisors and conducted an
extensive review, evaluation and negotiation of the terms and
conditions of the merger on behalf of WebMD. The WebMD Special
Committee, after giving careful consideration to the
presentation made by Morgan Joseph, determined by a unanimous
vote held at a meeting on June 17, 2009, that the merger is
advisable, procedurally and substantively fair to and in the
best interests of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
On June 17, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee unanimously
recommended to the WebMD Board of Directors that it approve the
merger, the merger agreement and each of the transactions
contemplated thereby. The WebMD Board of Directors adopted the
conclusions and analysis of the WebMD Special Committee
regarding the fairness of the transaction and, following the
WebMD Special Committees recommendation, the WebMD board
determined that the merger is advisable, procedurally and
substantively fair to and in the best interests of WebMD and the
unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, approved the merger, the merger
agreement and each of the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the issuance of the WebMD Common Stock and the
63
submission of the merger agreement to the WebMD stockholders for
adoption, and recommended that holders of WebMD Class A Common
Stock approve and adopt the merger agreement and approve the
proposed merger.
Opinion
of HLTHs Financial Advisor, Raymond James &
Associates, Inc.
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated November 7, 2007,
HLTH retained Raymond James as its financial advisor in
connection with the proposed merger. At the meeting of the HLTH
Board of Directors on June 17, 2009, Raymond James gave its
opinion that, as of such date and based upon, and subject to,
various qualifications and assumptions described with respect to
its opinion, the exchange ratio for the proposed merger was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of HLTH
Common Stock.
The full text of the written opinion of Raymond James, dated
June 17, 2009, which sets forth assumptions made, matters
considered, and limits on the scope of review undertaken, is
attached as Annex E to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Raymond Jamess opinion, which is
addressed to the HLTH Board of Directors, is directed only to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, to holders of HLTH
Common Stock, of the exchange ratio for the proposed merger.
Raymond James expressed no opinion on the relative merits of the
merger compared to any alternative that might be available to
HLTH or the terms of the merger agreement. Raymond Jamess
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of
HLTH Common Stock as to how such stockholder should vote at the
HLTH Annual Meeting and does not address any other aspect of the
proposed merger or any related transaction. Raymond Jamess
opinion does not address the fairness of the proposed merger to,
or any consideration that may be received by, the holders of any
other class of securities, creditors or constituencies of HLTH,
or the underlying decision by HLTH or its Board of Directors to
engage in the proposed merger. Raymond James expressed no
opinion as to the price at which HLTH Common Stock, WebMD Common
Stock, or any other securities would trade at any future time.
In addition, Raymond James did not express any view or opinion
as to the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the amount or
nature of any compensation payable to or to be received by
HLTHs officers, directors, or employees, or any class of
such persons, in connection with the merger. Raymond
Jamess opinion was authorized for issuance by the Fairness
Opinion Committee of Raymond James. Raymond James has consented
to the inclusion of its written opinion and the summary of the
opinion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In giving such
consent, Raymond James does not admit that it comes within the
category of persons whose consent is required under
Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder, nor
does Raymond James admit that it is an expert with respect to
any part of the Registration Statement on
Form S-4
of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
forms a part, within the meaning of the terms
experts as used in the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder. The
summary of the opinion of Raymond James set forth in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of such opinion. Holders of HLTH
Common Stock are urged to read this opinion in its entirety.
In arriving at its opinion, Raymond James, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms and conditions of the merger as
described in a draft of the merger agreement dated June 17,
2009;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the audited financial statements for each of HLTH and
WebMD as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
and the unaudited financial statements for the three month
period ended March 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
reviewed for each of HLTH and WebMD the annual reports filed on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and the
quarterly reports filed on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other publicly available information on HLTH
and WebMD;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other financial data and forecasts, balance
sheet estimates, and other operating information requested from
and provided by HLTH and WebMD;
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the historical stock price and trading activity for the
shares of HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
discussed their respective businesses, operations, historical
financial results, and future prospects with certain management
team members of HLTH and WebMD;
|
|
|
|
|
|
discussed with senior management of HLTH and WebMD certain
information related to the aforementioned; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
considered such other quantitative and qualitative factors that
it deemed to be relevant to its evaluation.
|
Financial forecasts and projections are subjective in many
respects and reflect numerous assumptions regarding general
business, economic, market and financial conditions and other
matters. None of HLTH, Raymond James or any of their respective
affiliates or representatives makes any representation to any
person regarding the financial forecasts and projections
reviewed in connection with Raymond Jamess opinion.
Stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
financial forecasts and projections because they are subject to
a variety of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially. There can be no
assurance that the financial forecasts and projections will be
achieved.
Raymond James did not assume responsibility for independent
verification of, and did not independently verify, any
information, whether publicly available or furnished to it by
HLTH or any other party, including, without limitation, any
financial information, forecasts, or projections considered in
connection with the rendering of its opinion. For purposes of
its opinion, Raymond James assumed and relied upon, with
permission from the HLTH Board of Directors, the accuracy and
completeness of all such information. Raymond James did not
conduct a physical inspection of any of the properties or
assets, and did not prepare or obtain any independent evaluation
or appraisal of any of the assets (including, without
limitation, HLTHs discontinued operations and related
assets, the ARS owned by each of HLTH and WebMD, or other
investment securities of HLTH and WebMD) or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise), of either entity. With respect to
financial forecasts and estimates, along with other information
and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with
Raymond James, Raymond James has (i) assumed, with
permission from the HLTH Board of Directors, that such
forecasts, estimates and other such information and data have
been reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the
best currently available estimates and judgments of management
and (ii) relied upon each party to advise Raymond James
promptly if any information previously provided became
inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of
its review.
In rendering its opinion, Raymond James assumed that the merger
would be consummated on the terms described in the merger
agreement. Furthermore, Raymond James assumed, in all respects
material to its analysis, that the representations and
warranties of each party contained in the merger agreement are
true and correct, that each party will perform all of the
covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under
the merger agreement, and that all conditions to the
consummation of the merger will be satisfied without being
waived. Raymond James also assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory, or other consents and approvals will
be obtained and that, in the course of obtaining any necessary
governmental, regulatory, or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the merger, as contemplated by
the merger agreement, no restrictions will be imposed or
amendments, modifications, or waivers made that would have any
material adverse effect on HLTH or WebMD. In the capacity of
rendering the opinion, Raymond James expressed no opinion
regarding the structure or tax consequences of the merger
agreement, or the availability or advisability of any
alternatives to the merger.
Raymond Jamess opinion is necessarily based on economic,
market, and other conditions and the information made available
to Raymond James as of June 17, 2009. It should be
understood that subsequent developments could affect Raymond
Jamess opinion and that, despite Raymond Jamess
agreement under its engagement letter to deliver subsequent or
bring-down fairness opinions if requested by the HLTH Board of
Directors, Raymond James does not have any obligation to
reaffirm its opinion.
65
Summary
of Financial Analyses Conducted by Raymond James
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
underlying Raymond Jamess opinion, dated June 17,
2009, delivered to the HLTH Board of Directors in connection
with the merger at a meeting of the HLTH Board of Directors on
June 17, 2009. The order of the analyses described below
does not represent the relative importance or weight given to
those analyses by Raymond James or by the HLTH Board of
Directors. Considering such data without considering the full
narrative description of the financial analyses could create a
misleading or incomplete view of Raymond Jamess financial
analyses.
In conducting its investigation, performing its analyses, and in
arriving at its opinion, Raymond James took into account such
accepted financial and investment banking procedures and
considerations as it deemed relevant, including the review of:
(i) the current and projected financial position and
results of operations of HLTH and WebMD; (ii) the
historical market prices and trading activity of the HLTH Common
Stock and WebMD Class A Common Stock; (iii) the
historical and projected revenues, operating earnings, net
income, and capitalization of WebMD and certain other publicly
held companies in businesses we believe to be similar, in whole
or in part, to WebMD; (iv) the discounted present value of
projected future cash flows of WebMD; and (v) the general
condition of the securities markets.
In arriving at its opinion, Raymond James did not attribute any
particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it,
but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and
relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, Raymond
James believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole
and that selecting portions of its analyses, without considering
all analyses, would create an incomplete view of the process
underlying its opinion.
The following summarizes the material financial analyses
presented by Raymond James to the HLTH Board of Directors at its
meeting on June 17, 2009 and considered by Raymond James in
rendering its opinion. The description below explains Raymond
Jamess methodology for evaluating the exchange ratio. No
company or transaction used in certain of the analyses described
below was deemed to be directly comparable to HLTH, WebMD, or
the merger, and the summary set forth below does not purport to
be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by
Raymond James.
Ownership Analysis: The merger agreement calls
for each HLTH stockholder to receive 0.4444 shares of WebMD
Common Stock for each share of HLTH Common Stock held. As a
result of the merger, 48.1 million shares of WebMD
Class B Common Stock owned by HLTH will be canceled, the
division of WebMD Common Stock into classes will be eliminated,
and HLTH shareholders, on a fully diluted basis using the
treasury stock method to account for the impact of
in-the-money
options, will receive an aggregate 48.0 million shares of
WebMD Common Stock. Post-merger, HLTH shareholders, on a fully
diluted basis, will own approximately 79.9% of WebMD, which is
substantially similar to HLTHs pre-merger WebMD ownership
of approximately 79.9%.
Historical Stock Trading Analysis: Raymond
James analyzed the performance of HLTH Common Stock between
June 15, 2007 and June 17, 2009. During this period,
HLTH Common Stock achieved a closing price high of $16.19 and a
closing price low of $7.79. The historical stock trading
analysis was presented to the Board of Directors of HLTH as
background information to compare to the closing stock price of
HLTH Common Stock of $11.76 on June 17, 2009 prior to
signing the merger agreement. Raymond James also presented a
stock price histogram, for the trailing twelve-month and
six-month periods, illustrating that approximately 85.0% of the
trading activity in HLTH Common Stock during the six months
prior to announcing the merger occurred at prices below the
$11.76 closing stock price on June 17, 2009.
Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis: Raymond
James analyzed the historical exchange ratio implied by the
terms of the merger agreement and the relative trading prices of
HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Common Stock between June 15,
2007 and June 17, 2009. The historical exchange ratio was
calculated by dividing the daily HLTH Common Stock per share
closing price by the WebMD Common Stock per share closing price
on the same day. During this period, the historical
30-day
moving average exchange ratio reached a high of 0.5118 and a low
of 0.2648 and averaged 0.3788.
66
Raymond James calculated the historical exchange ratio implied
by the methodology described above as of the closing price on
the following dates:
|
|
|
|
|
June 17, 2009: 0.4169 (at market exchange ratio one day
prior to announcing the Agreement)
|
|
|
|
October 20, 2008: 0.4168 (the day of announcing termination
of the previous merger between HLTH and WebMD)
|
|
|
|
February 20, 2008: 0.3468 (one day prior to announcing the
previous merger between HLTH and WebMD)
|
Sum-of-Parts
Analysis: Raymond James provided the Board of
Directors of HLTH with an estimated
sum-of-parts
valuation for HLTH to illustrate the estimated per share equity
value of HLTH that may or may not be achievable in a
disaggregation scenario as compared to HLTHs $11.76
closing stock price on June 17, 2009. The
sum-of-parts
analysis included the combination of: (i) the public market
value of HLTHs ownership in WebMD, with a range of
estimated divestiture proceeds of $12.44 to $12.40;
(ii) the estimated capitalization of HLTH, excluding WebMD
cash and cash equivalents but including (a) HLTH cash and
cash equivalents, (b) HLTH ARS (at 75% of face value per
the HLTH agreement with Citigroup) and (c) the face value
of outstanding HLTH convertible debt securities, with estimated
divestiture proceeds of ($0.89); (iii) the estimated
proceeds to be received from the sale of Porex, net of
applicable taxes and transaction expenses, with a range of
estimated divestiture proceeds of $0.96 to $1.24; and
(iv) the value of the residual HLTH NOL carryforward to be
delivered to WebMD in the merger, with a range of estimated
divestiture proceeds of $0.77 to $0.75. The analysis indicated a
total
sum-of-parts
values ranging from $13.28 to $13.50. The number of diluted HLTH
shares used in the calculation ranged from 109.1 million to
109.4 million, as the number of diluted HLTH shares
increases as the total per share value of HLTH increases due to
the impact of a larger number of
in-the-money
options.
Standalone WebMD Valuation: Raymond James
developed a view of the standalone valuation for WebMD to
compare with the closing stock price of WebMD on June 17,
2009. Analyses comprising this valuation included a selected
public companies analysis, a selected transactions analysis, and
a discounted cash flow analysis. Raymond James noted that the
reasons for, and circumstances surrounding, each of the
companies and transactions reviewed were diverse and that the
multiples fluctuated based on perceived growth, synergies,
strategic value, trading history, and other factors. None of the
companies considered is identical to WebMD and, accordingly,
Raymond Jamess analyses necessarily involved complex
considerations and judgments concerning the differences in
financial and operating characteristics and other factors that
would necessarily affect the comparison.
Selected Public Companies Analysis
Raymond James compared certain operating, financial, trading,
and valuation information for WebMD to certain publicly
available operating, financial, trading, and valuation
information for eight selected companies, each of which Raymond
James believes to have a business model reasonably similar, in
whole or in part, to that of WebMD. These selected companies
included:
|
|
|
|
|
Bankrate Inc.,
|
|
|
Dice Holdings, Inc.,
|
|
|
Google Inc.,
|
|
|
IAC/InterActive Corp.,
|
|
|
Internet Brands, Inc.,
|
|
|
The Knot, Inc.,
|
|
|
Monster Worldwide, Inc., and
|
|
|
Yahoo! Inc.
|
For each of the selected companies, Raymond James analyzed the
multiples of enterprise value (calculated as the sum of the
value of common equity on a fully diluted basis and the value of
net debt) divided by (i) estimated revenue and
(ii) estimated earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA, for the actual
calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and projected years
ending
67
December 31, 2009 and 2010. Raymond James reviewed the
mean, median, low, and high relative valuation multiples of the
selected companies and compared them to corresponding trading
multiples for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the
selected public company analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY2008
|
|
|
3.5
|
x
|
|
|
2.3
|
x
|
|
|
2.3
|
x
|
|
|
0.4
|
x
|
|
|
5.2
|
x
|
CY2009
|
|
|
3.2
|
x
|
|
|
2.6
|
x
|
|
|
2.6
|
x
|
|
|
0.5
|
x
|
|
|
5.2
|
x
|
CY2010
|
|
|
2.8
|
x
|
|
|
2.5
|
x
|
|
|
2.2
|
x
|
|
|
0.4
|
x
|
|
|
4.6
|
x
|
Enterprise Value/EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY2008
|
|
|
15.1
|
x
|
|
|
9.3
|
x
|
|
|
8.8
|
x
|
|
|
4.4
|
x
|
|
|
14.0
|
x
|
CY2009
|
|
|
11.9
|
x
|
|
|
10.0
|
x
|
|
|
9.5
|
x
|
|
|
5.2
|
x
|
|
|
15.2
|
x
|
CY2010
|
|
|
9.8
|
x
|
|
|
8.5
|
x
|
|
|
9.5
|
x
|
|
|
3.6
|
x
|
|
|
11.2
|
x
|
Raymond James then applied the mean and median multiples to the
relevant WebMD revenue and EBITDA metrics to determine a range
of implied WebMD enterprise values. After adjusting for
WebMDs capitalization, Raymond James reviewed the range of
per share prices derived in the selected public companies
analysis and compared them to the closing price per share for
WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the selected public
companies analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value per share based on
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
$
|
23.83
|
|
|
$
|
23.60
|
|
Median
|
|
$
|
23.19
|
|
|
$
|
23.83
|
|
WebMD (June 17, 2009)
|
|
$
|
28.21
|
|
|
$
|
28.21
|
|
Selected Transaction Analysis
Raymond James derived a range of potential values for WebMD
relative to select mergers and acquisitions involving companies
that Raymond James believed to have similar business models, in
whole or in part, to that of WebMD. The selected transactions
considered since February 2005 included:
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Corporations acquisition of CNet Networks Inc.,
announced in May 2008;
|
|
|
|
The Bankrate, Inc. acquisition of InsureMe, Inc., announced in
February 2008;
|
|
|
|
The Liberty Media Corp. acquisition of IAC/InterActive Corp.,
announced in January 2008;
|
|
|
|
The Tech Target, Inc. acquisition of KnowledgeStorm, Inc.,
announced in November 2007;
|
|
|
|
The R.H. Donnelley Corp. acquisition of Business.com, Inc.,
announced in July 2007; and
|
|
|
|
The ValueClick Inc. acquisition of MezMedia, Inc., announced in
July 2007.
|
|
|
|
The Knot, Inc. acquisition of WeddingChannel.com, Inc.,
announced in June 2006
|
|
|
|
NBC Universal, Inc. acquisition of iVillage Inc., announced in
March 2006
|
|
|
|
Google Inc. acquisition of AOL LLC (5% stake), announced in
December 2005
|
|
|
|
PRIMEDIA Inc. acquisition of Automotive.com, Inc., announced in
November 2005
|
|
|
|
News Corp. acquisition of IGN Entertainment, Inc., announced in
September 2005
|
|
|
|
News Corp. acquisition of Intermix Media Inc., announced in July
2005
|
|
|
|
IAC/Interactive Corp. acquisition of Ask Jeeves Inc., announced
in March 2005
|
|
|
|
The New York Times Company acquisition of About.com, Inc.,
announced in February 2005
|
68
Raymond James examined valuation multiples of transaction
enterprise value compared to the revenue and EBITDA of the
target companies, in each case for the reported twelve month
period prior to announcement of the transaction, where such
information was publicly available. Raymond James reviewed the
mean, median, low, and high relative valuation multiples of the
selected transactions and compared them to corresponding trading
multiples for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the
selected transactions analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value to Trailing Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
5.6
|
x
|
|
|
20.3
|
x
|
Median
|
|
|
5.1
|
x
|
|
|
18.5
|
x
|
Low
|
|
|
0.9
|
x
|
|
|
8.4
|
x
|
High
|
|
|
13.0
|
x
|
|
|
35.0
|
x
|
Raymond James then applied the mean and median multiples to the
relevant WebMD revenue and EBITDA metrics to determine a range
of implied WebMD enterprise values. After adjusting for
WebMDs capitalization, Raymond James reviewed the range of
per share prices derived in the selected transactions analysis
and compared them to the closing price per share for WebMD on
June 17, 2009. The results of the selected transactions
analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
$
|
38.82
|
|
Median
|
|
$
|
36.13
|
|
WebMD (June 17, 2009)
|
|
$
|
28.21
|
|
In its oral presentation to the HLTH Board, Raymond James
highlighted those transactions that have closed since July 2007.
The results of the selected transactions analysis for that
period are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value to Trailing
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
4.2
|
x
|
|
|
16.9
|
x
|
Median
|
|
|
4.6
|
x
|
|
|
17.9
|
x
|
Low
|
|
|
0.9
|
x
|
|
|
8.4
|
x
|
High
|
|
|
6.9
|
x
|
|
|
23.6
|
x
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Raymond James analyzed the discounted present value of
WebMDs projected free cash flows for the six months ending
December 31, 2009 and for the years ending
December 31, 2010 through 2014. Raymond James used
unleveraged free cash flows, defined as earnings before
interest, plus depreciation, plus amortization, less capital
expenditures, less cash taxes for operations, less change in net
working capital.
The discounted cash flow analysis was prepared using published
research analyst projections of the financial performance of
WebMD. Raymond James used calendar year 2014 as the final year
for the analysis and applied transaction multiples, ranging from
8.0x to 12.0x, to calendar CY2014 EBITDA in order to derive a
range of terminal values for the Company in 2014.
The projected unlevered free cash flows and terminal values were
discounted using rates ranging from 10.0% to 14.0%, which
reflected the average cost of capital for WebMD. The resulting
range of present enterprise values was adjusted by the
Companys current capitalization and divided by the number
of diluted shares outstanding in order to arrive at a range of
present values per WebMD share. Raymond James reviewed the range
of per share prices produced in the discounted cash flow
analysis and compared them to the closing
69
price per share for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of
the discounted cash flow analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
26.13
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
37.85
|
|
WebMD (June 17, 2009)
|
|
$
|
28.21
|
|
Additional
Considerations
The foregoing summary describes all analyses and quantitative
factors that Raymond James deemed material in its presentation
to the HLTH Board of Directors but is not a comprehensive
description of all analyses performed and factors considered by
Raymond James in connection with preparing its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving
the application of subjective business judgment in determining
the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis
and the application of those methods to the particular
circumstances and, therefore, is not readily susceptible to
summary description. In arriving at its fairness determination,
Raymond James did not assign specific weights to any particular
analyses.
The analyses conducted by Raymond James were prepared solely for
the purpose of enabling Raymond James to provide its opinion to
the HLTH Board of Directors as to the fairness of the exchange
ratio, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of
HLTH. The analyses are not appraisals nor do they necessarily
reflect the prices at which assets or securities actually may be
sold. In performing its analyses, Raymond James made, and was
provided by HLTHs management with, numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business,
economic, and regulatory conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of HLTH. The analyses performed by
Raymond James, particularly those based on forecasts, are not
necessarily indicative of actual values, trading values, or
actual future results which might be achieved, all of which may
be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such
analyses at the time of the opinion delivery. Because such
analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon
numerous factors or events beyond the control of HLTH or its
advisors, none of HLTH, Raymond James or any other person
assumes responsibility if future results or actual values are
materially different from these forecasts or assumptions. All
such analyses were prepared solely as a part of Raymond
Jamess analysis of the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the exchange ratio to the stockholders of HLTH. The
opinion of Raymond James was one of many factors taken into
consideration by the HLTH Board of Directors in making its
determination to approve the merger. Consequently, the analyses
described above should not be viewed as determinative of the
opinion of the HLTH Board of Directors or management with
respect to the value of HLTH. HLTH placed no limits of the scope
of the analysis performed, or opinion expressed, by Raymond
James. The HLTH Board of Directors selected Raymond James as
financial advisor in connection with the merger based on Raymond
Jamess qualifications, expertise, reputation, and
experience in mergers and acquisitions. For services rendered in
connection with the delivery of its opinion, HLTH paid Raymond
James a fee of $100,000 upon delivery of its opinion. HLTH will
also pay Raymond James a customary fee for advisory services in
the amount of $1,000,000 in connection with, and contingent upon
consummation of, the merger. HLTH also agreed to reimburse
Raymond James for expenses incurred in connection with its
services, including the fees and expenses of its counsel, and
will indemnify Raymond James, including for liabilities under
federal securities laws, relating to, or arising out of, its
engagement.
Raymond James is actively involved in the investment banking
business and regularly undertakes the valuation of investment
securities in connection with public offerings, private
placements, business combinations, and similar transactions. In
the ordinary course of business, Raymond James may trade in the
securities of HLTH for its own account and for the accounts of
its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or
short position in such securities.
Raymond James was retained by the HLTH Board of Directors,
pursuant to the engagement letter described above, in connection
with the proposed merger that was entered into on
February 20, 2008 and later terminated on October 19, 2008,
for which it received a retainer fee of $50,000 and a fee of
$500,000 for rendering its opinion with respect to certain
financial aspects of such proposed merger. Other than the
70
engagement of Raymond James by the HLTH Board of Directors
described in this section, there are no existing or contemplated
material relationships or arrangements for future services, nor
have any such relationships or arrangements existed or been
contemplated during the past two years, involving or resulting
in the payment or receipt of compensation between Raymond James
and any party to the transaction.
Opinion
of Financial Advisor to the WebMD Special Committee, Morgan
Joseph & Co. Inc.
In connection with its review and analysis of the merger, the
WebMD Special Committee engaged Morgan Joseph to advise the
WebMD Special Committee and to furnish a written opinion as to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the WebMD
stockholders (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of
WebMD and HLTH and their respective affiliates) of the
consideration to be paid by WebMD in the merger to holders of
HLTH Common Stock. The WebMD Special Committee selected Morgan
Joseph as its financial advisor because, among other reasons,
Morgan Joseph has experience in the valuation of businesses and
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions.
At a meeting of the WebMD Special Committee on June 17,
2009, Morgan Joseph furnished to the WebMD Special Committee its
opinion (which we refer to as the Morgan Joseph Opinion) that,
as of such date, and based upon the assumptions made, matters
considered and limitations of its review as set forth in its
written opinion, the consideration to be paid by WebMD in the
merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the WebMD
stockholders (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of
WebMD and HLTH and their respective affiliates).
Morgan Joseph has consented to the inclusion of its written
opinion and the summary of the opinion in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The description of the Morgan Joseph
Opinion set forth in this section is qualified by reference to
the full text of the Morgan Joseph Opinion set forth in
Annex F. You are urged to read the Morgan Joseph Opinion in
its entirety for a description of the procedures followed,
assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and
limitations on the Morgan Joseph Opinion and the review and
analyses undertaken by Morgan Joseph in furnishing to the WebMD
Special Committee the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
The Morgan Joseph Opinion is addressed and was furnished
solely to the WebMD Special Committee and addresses only the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the WebMD
stockholders (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of
WebMD and HLTH and their respective affiliates), from a
financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid by
WebMD in the merger. It does not address the merits of the
underlying business decision by WebMD, the WebMD Special
Committee or the WebMD Board of Directors to propose, consider,
approve, recommend, declare advisable or consummate the merger,
and does not constitute a recommendation to WebMD, the WebMD
Special Committee, the WebMD Board of Directors, the WebMD
stockholders, or any other WebMD constituent, person or entity
as to how such person should vote or as to any other specific
action that should be taken in connection with the
transaction.
In connection with furnishing the Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan
Joseph reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the June 11, 2009 draft of the merger agreement which WebMD
represented to Morgan Joseph was, with respect to all of the
material terms and conditions thereof, substantially in the form
of the definitive agreement executed and delivered by the
parties thereto promptly after the receipt of the Morgan Joseph
Opinion;
|
|
|
|
the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed by WebMD with the SEC for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed by WebMD with the SEC for its fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2009, and certain other Exchange Act filings made
by WebMD with the SEC;
|
|
|
|
the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed by HLTH with the SEC for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed by HLTH with the SEC for its fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2009, and certain other Exchange Act filings made
by HLTH with the SEC;
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
certain other publicly available business and financial
information concerning HLTH and its subsidiaries, including
WebMD, and the industries in which they operate, which Morgan
Joseph believed to be relevant to their analyses;
|
|
|
|
with respect to the valuation of the net operating losses of
HLTH, certain information prepared internally by HLTH;
|
|
|
|
with respect to HLTH and its subsidiaries other than WebMD,
certain information prepared internally by HLTH and other data
relating to their respective businesses and prospects, including
certain budgets, forecasts and presentations prepared by HLTH
and WebMD, which were provided to Morgan Joseph by HLTHs
senior management;
|
|
|
|
with respect to WebMD, certain information prepared internally
by WebMD and certain other data relating to its business and
prospects, including certain budgets and presentations prepared
by WebMD, which were provided to Morgan Joseph by WebMDs
senior management;
|
|
|
|
the reported prices and trading activity of WebMD Class A
Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
certain publicly available information concerning certain other
companies which Morgan Joseph believed to be relevant and the
trading markets for certain of such other companies
securities; and
|
|
|
|
the financial terms of certain recent business combinations
which Morgan Joseph believes to be relevant.
|
Morgan Joseph also had discussions with various officers and
employees of WebMD and HLTH concerning the transaction and their
businesses, operations, assets, present condition and prospects
and undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as
Morgan Joseph deemed relevant.
In performing its analyses, numerous assumptions, including the
assumptions described below, were made with respect to industry
performance, general business, economic, market and financial
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of Morgan Joseph, the WebMD Special Committee, WebMD and
HLTH. Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by
Morgan Joseph are not necessarily indicative of actual values or
future results, which may be significantly more or less
favorable than those suggested by such analyses. Additionally,
estimates of the value of businesses or securities do not
purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which those
businesses or securities might actually be sold. Accordingly,
the analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial
uncertainty.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Joseph, with the WebMD
Special Committees permission, assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
and data, including financial forecasts and forward-looking
financial data, provided to or otherwise reviewed by or
discussed with it, and upon the assurances of the senior
managements of HLTH and WebMD that all information relevant to
its opinion had been disclosed and made available to it and did
not attempt independently to verify such information, nor did it
assume any responsibility to do so. Morgan Joseph further relied
upon the assurances of the senior managements of HLTH and WebMD
that they were not aware of any facts that would make such
information inaccurate or misleading. Morgan Joseph utilized the
financial projections and forecasts with respect to Porex in
assessing the potential value for Porex in the analyses
described below with respect to HLTH. Without limiting the
foregoing, Morgan Joseph relied upon, without independent
verification, the information provided to it by WebMD with
respect to WebMDs cash balances, including the value of
auction rate securities included in WebMDs cash balances
and any impairment to the value thereto and the information
provided to it by HLTH with respect to HLTHs cash
balances, including the value of auction rate securities
included in HLTHs cash balances and any impairment to the
value thereto. With respect to Porex, Morgan Joseph further
assumed, with the WebMD Special Committees permission,
that HLTHs forecasts and projections provided to and
reviewed by it had been reasonably prepared in good faith based
upon the best current estimates, information and judgment of the
respective HLTH subsidiaries managements as to the future
financial condition, cash flows and results of operations of
HLTH and its consolidated subsidiaries other than WebMD. In that
regard, Morgan Joseph assumed, with the WebMD Special
Committees permission, that
72
all of WebMDs material assets and liabilities (contingent
or otherwise) were as set forth in financial statements or other
information made available to Morgan Joseph.
Morgan Joseph made no independent investigation of any legal,
accounting or tax matters affecting WebMD or HLTH, and assumed
the correctness of all legal, accounting and tax advice given to
WebMD and its Board of Directors and the WebMD Special
Committee. In particular, Morgan Joseph was instructed to assume
that none of the NOL carryforwards of WebMD will be utilized by
HLTH pursuant to the tax sharing agreement between WebMD and
HLTH prior to the consummation of the transaction and that such
net operating losses will be utilized pursuant to the estimates
of WebMDs taxable income as projected in the
analysts model. Furthermore, Morgan Joseph was instructed
to utilize an estimate of $19.0 million for the net costs
related to HLTHs Department of Justice investigation,
irrespective of any differing amount set forth in any pro forma
balance sheet prepared by WebMD. Morgan Joseph further assumed
that the transaction would be consummated on the terms described
in the drafts of the merger agreement, without any waiver,
delay, amendment or modification of any material terms or
conditions.
Morgan Joseph did not conduct a physical inspection of the
properties and facilities of WebMD or HLTH, nor did it make or
obtain any independent evaluation or appraisal of such
properties and facilities. Morgan Joseph also took into account
its assessment of general economic, market and financial
conditions and its experience in similar transactions, as well
as its experience in securities valuation in general. Morgan
Josephs opinion necessarily is based upon economic,
financial, political, regulatory and other conditions as they
existed and could be evaluated on the date of the Morgan Joseph
Opinion and Morgan Joseph assumed no responsibility to update or
revise its opinion based upon events or circumstances occurring
after such date. Morgan Joseph did not express any opinion as to
what the market reaction might be to the proposed transaction or
how WebMD Common Stock might trade after the announcement of the
transaction.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Joseph was not authorized to
solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with
respect to an acquisition, business combination or other
transaction involving WebMD or its assets. Morgan Joseph also
expressed no opinion about the fairness of the amount or nature
of the compensation to any of WebMDs or HLTHs
officers, directors or employees, or class of such persons,
relative to the compensation to the public stockholders of WebMD.
In connection with furnishing to the WebMD Special Committee the
Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan Joseph performed a variety of
financial analyses, which are summarized below. These analyses
were presented to the WebMD Special Committee at a meeting held
on June 17, 2009. The summary set forth below does not
purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed
by Morgan Joseph in this regard. Certain of the summaries of
financial analyses include information set forth in tabular
format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses used
by Morgan Joseph, the tables must be read together with the text
of each summary. The preparation of an opinion regarding
financial fairness involves various determinations as to the
most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analyses and
the application of these methods to the particular
circumstances, and, therefore, such an opinion is not readily
susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description.
Accordingly, notwithstanding the separate analyses summarized
below, Morgan Joseph believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses and factors considered by it, without considering all
of its analyses and factors, or attempting to ascribe relative
weights to some or all of its analyses and factors, could create
an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying the
Morgan Joseph Opinion.
Morgan Joseph was specifically informed by management of WebMD
and HLTH that the financial forecasts and forward-looking
financial data regarding their respective companies were based
upon numerous variables and assumptions. These variables and
assumptions are inherently uncertain, including, without
limitation, factors related to general market, industry,
economic and competitive conditions. Accordingly, Morgan Joseph
was informed that actual results could vary significantly from
those set forth in such financial forecasts and forward-looking
financial data.
No company or transaction used in the analyses described below
is identical to WebMD, HLTH or the proposed merger. Accordingly,
an analysis of the results thereof necessarily involves complex
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial
and operating characteristics and other factors that could
73
affect the proposed merger or the public trading or other values
of WebMD, HLTH or companies to which they are being compared.
Mathematical analysis (such as determining an average or median)
is not in itself a meaningful method of using selected
acquisition or company data. In addition, in performing such
analyses, Morgan Joseph relied upon, with the WebMD Special
Committees permission and without any independent
verification, projections prepared by research analysts at
established securities firms, any of which may or may not prove
to be accurate.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Joseph did not attribute any
particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it.
Each analysis was ultimately qualitative in nature given that
the comparisons with other transactions or metrics did not lend
themselves to mathematical weights contributing to a
total which translated into a determination of fairness. These
analyses and other factors were then evaluated together as a
whole, reflecting qualitative judgments regarding the
significance and relevance of each analysis and factor, which
together informed the ultimate conclusions of Morgan Joseph, but
no single analysis was determinative in rendering a conclusion
regarding the fairness of the consideration to be paid in the
proposed transaction. Accordingly, Morgan Joseph believes that
its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of its analyses, without considering all analyses,
would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its
opinion.
The following is a summary of the material analyses performed by
Morgan Joseph in connection with the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
Analyses
With Respect to the Merger
Morgan Joseph conducted analyses with respect to the value of
HLTH which were based upon the estimated component values of the
various businesses and other assets that are owned by HLTH.
These included: (i) approximately 48.1 million shares
of WebMD Class B Common Stock; (ii) 100% of the
outstanding capital stock of Porex; (iii) approximately
$314.3 million in cash on hand and auction rate securities
with a value of $146.9 million; and (iv) the value of
NOL carryforwards which could be utilized by WebMD following the
merger. Morgan Joseph also considered the principal factors that
reduced the value of HLTH, which included: (i) the
estimated value of HLTHs obligations with respect to its
convertible notes and associated tax liabilities; (ii) the
estimated net costs related to the Department of Justice
investigation; (iii) the estimated liabilities associated
with the taxes and transaction fees and expenses that would be
due upon the disposal of Porex; (iv) potential additional
reductions in the value of the auction rate securities held by
HLTH, calculated by reference to their loanable value; and
(v) HLTHs severance costs and transaction fees and
expenses associated with the transaction. Morgan Joseph assumed,
with the WebMD Special Committees permission, that all
issued and outstanding HLTH stock options, whether exercisable
or not, would convert into WebMD stock options at the effective
time of the merger.
Analyses
with Respect to Ownership of WebMD Common Stock
The most significant component of the value owned by HLTH is its
ownership of approximately 48.1 million shares of WebMD
Class B Common Stock. Based upon the analyses of the value
of WebMD above, Morgan Joseph estimated the value of HLTHs
ownership of WebMD Class B Common Stock based upon
WebMDs trading price as of the close of business on
June 17, 2009. No control premium was attributed to the
value of HLTHs ownership of WebMD Class B Common
Stock in Morgan Josephs analysis. The resulting value of
HLTHs ownership of WebMD was between $12.54 and $12.55 per
share of HLTH Common Stock depending upon the level of dilution
from option exercises assumed.
With respect to Porex, Morgan Joseph conducted separate
valuation analyses on the company, as summarized below. Net of
estimated taxes and transaction fees and expenses, Morgan
Josephs analysis indicated Porex had a value of between
$91.2 million and $131.7 million, or between $0.84 and
$1.22 per share of HLTH Common Stock. In combination with the
other valuation factors described above,
Morgan Josephs analysis indicated HLTHs equity
value was between $1.368 billion and $1.376 billion,
or between $12.65 and $12.72 per share of HLTH Common
Stock.
74
Analyses
with Respect to Porex
Morgan Joseph prepared a series of analyses with respect to the
value of Porex. Porexs business is composed of two groups,
the Porous Products Group and the Surgical Products Group.
Because these groups exhibit different business and financial
characteristics, and are comparable to different companies,
Morgan Joseph analyzed separately the value of each of
these groups. Morgan Josephs analysis indicated a range of
values for Porex as a whole of approximately $100.0 million
to $145.0 million.
Analyses
with Respect to Porex Porous Products
Group
Selected
Companies Analysis
Using publicly available company SEC filings, research analyst
estimates and other publicly available information, Morgan
Joseph analyzed, among other things, the implied value of the
Porous Products Group based upon corresponding trading multiples
of selected companies that Morgan Joseph believed were generally
comparable to the Porous Products Group. These selected
companies are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
Millipore Corporation
|
|
|
Pentair, Inc.
|
|
|
Pall Corporation
|
|
|
Donaldson Company, Inc.
|
|
|
Bemis Company, Inc.
|
|
|
CLARCOR Inc.
|
|
|
Polypore International, Inc.
|
|
|
Sartorius Group
|
|
|
Filtrona plc
|
|
|
Rogers Corporation
|
|
|
Porvair plc
|
In its analysis, Morgan Joseph derived a range of trading
multiples for the selected companies, including, but not limited
to, enterprise value as a multiple of projected EBITDA,
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value, which Morgan Joseph defined as market
capitalization plus the par value of total debt including
out-of-the-money
convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an
as converted basis, if applicable) minus cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities, divided by EBITDA, which excludes
one-time charges and includes stock-based compensation.
|
Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable
to the Porous Products Group in all respects, they were chosen
because they have operations, lines of business
and/or
product segments that for purposes of analysis may be considered
similar to certain of the Porous Products Groups
operations, lines of business
and/or
product segments.
The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph included
trading multiples exhibited by the selected companies with
respect to their 2009 projected financial performance. All
trading multiples for the selected companies were based upon
closing stock prices as of June 17, 2009. The table below
provides a summary of these trading multiples:
Trading
Multiples Observed from the Selected Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Enterprise Value/2009 Projected EBITDA
|
|
9.0x
|
|
8.8x
|
|
12.7x
|
|
4.4x
|
Selected
Comparable Transactions Analysis
Using publicly available information, Morgan Joseph analyzed,
among other things, the implied enterprise value of the Porous
Products Group, based upon corresponding transaction purchase
price multiples paid in selected precedent merger and
acquisition transactions that it deemed relevant in reviewing
the financial terms
75
of the proposed merger, which are presented in the table below
in reverse chronological order based upon the date of
announcement:
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Target Company
|
|
Acquiror Company
|
|
October 16, 2008
|
|
Western Filter Corporation
|
|
Donaldson Company Inc.
|
February 4, 2008
|
|
Whatman plc
|
|
General Electric Company (GE Healthcare)
|
October 17, 2007
|
|
Perry Equipment Corporation
|
|
CLARCOR Inc.
|
March 6, 2007
|
|
Porous Media Corporation
|
|
Pentair Inc.
|
August 2, 2005
|
|
domnick hunter group plc
|
|
Parker Hannifin Corporation
|
May 12, 2005
|
|
CUNO Incorporated
|
|
3M Company
|
June 1, 2004
|
|
BHA Group Holdings, Inc.
|
|
General Electric Company
|
March 17, 2004
|
|
Apogent Technologies Inc.
|
|
Fisher Scientific International Inc.
|
February 3, 2004
|
|
Polypore, Inc.
|
|
Warburg Pincus LLC
|
February 2, 2004
|
|
Waterlink (UK) Limited
|
|
Calgon Carbon Corp
|
November 18, 2003
|
|
Everpure, Inc.
|
|
Pentair, Inc.
|
March 6, 2002
|
|
Filtrations & Separations Group
|
|
Pall Corp.
|
Morgan Joseph selected these transactions, among other reasons,
because the targets involved in such transactions operate in
similar industries and have similar lines of business to the
Porous Products Group. However, none of the target companies is
identical or directly comparable to the Porous Products Group,
and no transaction involving the Porous Products Group has been
proposed. For each precedent transaction, Morgan Joseph
determined the transaction value (which is defined as the
purchase price of the equity plus the par value of total debt
including
out-of-the-money
convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an
as converted basis, if applicable) less cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities) as a multiple of the target
companys EBITDA, which excludes one-time charges and
includes stock-based compensation, for the LTM period. The table
below provides a summary of these transaction purchase price
multiples:
Purchase
Price Multiples Observed from the Selected
Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Transaction Value/LTM EBITDA
|
|
11.7x
|
|
11.4x
|
|
20.5x
|
|
6.7x
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Using HLTHs projected financial information for the Porous
Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, Morgan Joseph
calculated the net present value of free cash flows of the
Porous Products Group using discount rates ranging from 12.2% to
14.2%. Morgan Josephs estimate of the appropriate range of
discount rates was based upon the estimated cost of capital for
the selected companies used in the selected publicly traded
companies analysis. Morgan Joseph also estimated a range of
terminal values for the Porous Products Group based upon
multiples of EBITDA in fiscal year 2013 that ranged from 5.0x to
7.0x and discounted these terminal values using the assumed
range of discount rates. Morgan Josephs estimate of the
appropriate range of terminal multiples was based upon the
multiples from the selected companies and the selected
transactions used in the selected comparable transactions
analysis. The present values of the implied terminal values of
the Porous Products Group were then added to the present value
of the after-tax free cash flows to arrive at a range of
enterprise values.
Leveraged
Buyout Analysis
Based upon HLTHs projected financial information for the
Porous Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, Morgan
Joseph performed a leveraged buyout analysis to determine the
potential implied enterprise value that might be achieved in an
acquisition of Porous Products Group in a leveraged buyout
76
transaction assuming an exit from the business in fiscal year
2013. Estimated exit values were calculated by applying a range
of multiples from 5.0x to 7.0x EBITDA in fiscal year 2013, the
same terminal value multiples used in the discounted cash flow
analysis. Morgan Joseph then derived a range of theoretical
purchase prices based upon a range of assumed required internal
rates of return on equity for a buyer of approximately 27.0% to
33.0%, which range was assumed to be generally reflective of the
range of required internal rates of return on equity commonly
assumed when performing a leveraged buyout analysis of this type.
Analyses
with Respect to Porex Surgical Products
Group
Selected
Companies Analysis
Using publicly available company SEC filings, research analyst
estimates and other publicly available information, Morgan
Joseph analyzed, among other things, the implied value of the
Surgical Products Group based upon corresponding trading
multiples of selected companies that Morgan Joseph believed were
generally comparable to the Surgical Products Group. These
selected companies are set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Corporation
|
|
|
Synthes, Inc.
|
|
|
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
Smith & Nephew plc
|
|
|
Orthofix International N.V.
|
|
|
Wright Medical Group, Inc.
|
|
|
Symmetry Medical Inc.
|
|
|
Kensey Nash Corporation
|
|
|
Exactech, Inc.
|
In its analysis, Morgan Joseph derived a range of trading
multiples for the selected companies, including, but not limited
to, enterprise value as a multiple of projected EBITDA,
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value, which Morgan Joseph defined as market
capitalization plus the par value of total debt including
out-of-the-money
convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an
as converted basis, if applicable) minus cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities, divided by EBITDA, which excludes
one-time charges and includes stock-based compensation.
|
Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable
to the Surgical Products Group in all respects, they were chosen
because they have operations, lines of business
and/or
product segments that for purposes of analysis may be considered
similar to certain of the Surgical Products Groups
operations, lines of business
and/or
product segments.
The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph included
trading multiples exhibited by the selected companies with
respect to their 2009 projected financial performance. All
trading multiples for the selected companies were based upon
closing stock prices as of June 17, 2009. The table below
provides a summary of these trading multiples:
Trading
Multiples Observed from the Selected Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/2009 Projected EBITDA
|
|
|
7.3x
|
|
|
|
7.1x
|
|
|
|
8.6x
|
|
|
|
6.3x
|
|
Selected
Comparable Transactions Analysis
Using publicly available information, Morgan Joseph analyzed,
among other things, the implied enterprise value of the Porous
Products Group, based upon corresponding transaction purchase
price multiples paid in selected precedent merger and
acquisition transactions that it deemed relevant in reviewing
the financial terms
77
of the proposed merger, which are presented in the table below
in reverse chronological order based upon the date of
announcement:
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Target Company
|
|
Acquiror Company
|
|
December 1, 2008
|
|
Mentor Corporation
|
|
ETHICON, INC.
|
January 15, 2008
|
|
Lifecore Biomedical, Inc.
|
|
Warburg Pincus LLC
|
July 16, 2007
|
|
DJO Incorporated
|
|
ReABLE Therapeutics, Inc.
|
March 12, 2007
|
|
Plus Orthopedics AG
|
|
Smith & Nephew plc
|
November 14, 2006
|
|
Newdeal Technologies, SA
|
|
Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation
|
February 27, 2006
|
|
Aircast Incorporated
|
|
dj Orthopedics LLC
|
August 9, 2004
|
|
Empi, Inc.
|
|
Encore Medical Corporation
|
April 28, 2004
|
|
MedSource Technologies Inc.
|
|
Accellent, Inc. (Medical Device
Manufacturing, Inc.)
|
Morgan Joseph selected these transactions, among other reasons,
because the targets involved in such transactions operate in
similar industries and have similar lines of business to the
Surgical Products Group. However, none of the target companies
is identical or directly comparable to the Surgical Products
Group, and no transaction involving the Surgical Products Group
has been proposed. For each precedent transaction, Morgan Joseph
determined the transaction value (which is defined as the
purchase price of the equity plus the par value of total debt
including
out-of-the-money
convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an
as converted basis, if applicable) less cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities) as a multiple of the target
companys EBITDA, which excludes one-time charges and
includes stock-based compensation, for the LTM period. The table
below provides a summary of these transaction purchase price
multiples:
Purchase
Price Multiples Observed from the Selected
Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Transaction Value/LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
12.8x
|
|
|
|
14.0x
|
|
|
|
15.7x
|
|
|
|
7.3x
|
|
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Using HLTHs projected financial information for the
Surgical Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013,
Morgan Joseph calculated the net present value of free cash
flows of the Surgical Products Group using discount rates
ranging from 14.0% to 16.0%. Morgan Josephs estimate of
the appropriate range of discount rates was based on the
estimated cost of capital for the selected companies used in the
selected publicly traded companies analysis. Morgan Joseph also
estimated a range of terminal values for the Surgical Products
Group based upon EBITDA in fiscal year 2013 that ranged from
6.0x to 8.0x and discounted these terminal values using the
assumed range of discount rates. Morgan Josephs estimate
of the appropriate range of terminal multiples was based upon
the multiples of the selected companies and the selected
transactions used in the selected comparable transactions
analysis. The present values of the implied terminal values of
the Surgical Products Group were then added to the present value
of the after-tax free cash flows to arrive at a range of
enterprise values.
Leveraged
Buyout Analysis
Based upon HLTHs projected financial information for the
Surgical Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013,
Morgan Joseph performed a leveraged buyout analysis to determine
the potential implied enterprise value that might be achieved in
an acquisition of Surgical Products Group in a leveraged buyout
transaction assuming an exit from the business in fiscal year
2013. Estimated exit values were calculated by applying a range
of multiples from 6.0x to 8.0x EBITDA in fiscal year 2013, the
same terminal value multiples used in the discounted cash flow
analysis. Morgan Joseph then derived a range of theoretical
purchase prices based upon a range of assumed required internal
rates of return on equity for a buyer of approximately 27.0% to
78
33.0%, which range was assumed to be generally reflective of the
range of required internal rates of return on equity commonly
assumed when performing a leveraged buyout analysis of this type.
Miscellaneous
WebMD and Morgan Joseph entered into a letter agreement dated
June 1, 2009 relating to the services to be provided by
Morgan Joseph in connection with the proposed merger. WebMD
agreed to pay Morgan Joseph a customary engagement fee in the
amount of $100,000 and a fee in the amount of $850,000 upon
delivery of its opinion. The fees were not contingent upon
either the conclusion of its opinion or the consummation of the
transaction. WebMD also agreed to reimburse Morgan Joseph for
its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with its engagement, including
certain fees and disbursements of its legal counsel, and to
indemnify Morgan Joseph against liabilities relating to or
arising out of its engagement, including liabilities under the
securities laws. The opinion was approved and issued by Morgan
Josephs opinion committee. In the ordinary course of its
business, Morgan Joseph may acquire, hold or sell, long or short
positions, or trade or otherwise effect transactions in equity
and other securities and financial instruments (including loans
and other obligations) of, or investments in, WebMD and HLTH.
Within the past two years, Morgan Joseph acted as financial
advisor to the WebMD Special Committee in connection with the
Proposed 2008 Merger and, in connection therewith, received fees
of $2,000,000 in the aggregate for such services. Other than
these engagements, Morgan Joseph has not acted as a financial
advisor to any party involved in the transaction within the past
three years. In addition, there are no other existing material
relationships involving the payment or receipt of compensation
between Morgan Joseph and any party to the transaction during
the last two years. Morgan Joseph may in the future seek to
provide investment banking services to WebMD, HLTH, or any of
their affiliates, and receive customary fees for such services.
Certain
Effects of the Merger
Conversion
of Outstanding HLTH Common Stock
Upon the merger agreement being adopted by the HLTH stockholders
and the WebMD stockholders in accordance with the merger
agreement and the General Corporation Law, and the other
conditions to the closing of the merger being satisfied or
waived, HLTH will be merged with and into WebMD, with WebMD
continuing as the surviving corporation. Following the merger,
the current HLTH stockholders and WebMD stockholders will
directly own all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of
WebMD. See The Merger Agreement for a complete
description of the merger agreement.
Effect
on Ownership Structure of WebMD
At the effective time of the merger, HLTHs current
stockholders will have ownership interests in WebMD and rights
as WebMD stockholders. Therefore, HLTHs current
stockholders will participate alongside the current WebMD
stockholders in any earnings or growth of WebMD following the
merger and will benefit from any increase in the value of WebMD
following the merger. For information regarding the interests in
WebMDs net book value and net income by HLTH and the
holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock immediately before
the merger and by HLTH stockholders and the holders of WebMD
Class A Common Stock immediately following the merger, see
Interests in Net Income and Net Book Value of WebMD.
Upon the filing of the certificate of merger, the WebMD
certificate of incorporation will be amended, which we refer to,
as amended, as the Amended WebMD Charter, to eliminate the dual
class structure of Common Stock at WebMD, and all WebMD
stockholders following the merger will own the same class of
Common Stock. Pursuant to the merger agreement, each share of
Class B Common Stock of WebMD issued and outstanding or
held in treasury immediately prior to the completion of the
merger will be cancelled.
79
Effect
on Listing, Registration and Status of HLTH Common
Stock
HLTHs Common Stock is currently registered under the
Exchange Act and is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the symbol HLTH. As a result of the merger,
the separate corporate existence of HLTH will cease. After the
merger, HLTHs Common Stock will cease to be listed on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market, and price quotations with respect
to sales of shares of HLTHs Common Stock in the public
market will no longer be available. In addition, registration of
the Common Stock of HLTH under the Exchange Act will be
terminated, and HLTHs obligation to file reports under the
Exchange Act will be suspended.
Effect
on Organization and Management of WebMD
At the effective time of the merger, the directors of both WebMD
and HLTH will become the directors of the surviving corporation
in the merger and the WebMD board will accordingly be increased
to 12 members. It is expected that, immediately following the
effective time of the merger, the officers of WebMD immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger will remain officers
of the surviving corporation and will generally have the same
positions they held at WebMD. The certificate of incorporation
of WebMD as amended upon the filing of the certificate of merger
will, from and after the effective time of the merger, be the
certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation, until
duly amended as provided therein or by applicable law. The
amended and restated bylaws of WebMD, as in effect immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger, will, from and after
the effective time of the merger, be the bylaws of the surviving
corporation, until duly amended as provided therein or by
applicable law.
It is expected that, upon consummation of the merger, the
operations of WebMD will be conducted substantially as they
currently are being conducted. Management of WebMD does not have
any present plans or proposals that relate to, or would result
in, an extraordinary corporate transaction following completion
of the merger involving WebMDs corporate structure,
business or management, such as a merger, reorganization,
liquidation, relocation of any operations or sale or transfer of
a material amount of assets. It is expected, however, that
following the merger, WebMDs management will continuously
evaluate and review WebMDs business and operations and may
develop new plans and proposals that they consider appropriate
to maximize the value of WebMD. WebMD reserves the right to make
any changes deemed appropriate in light of its evaluation and
review or in light of future developments.
Plans
for the Companies if the Merger is Not Completed
It is expected that, if the merger is not completed, the current
management of HLTH, under the direction of the HLTH Board of
Directors, will continue to manage HLTH as a separate company,
and the current management of WebMD, under the direction of the
WebMD board, will continue to manage WebMD as an ongoing
business that will continue to be controlled by HLTH. From time
to time, it is expected that each of HLTH and WebMD will
evaluate and review its respective business operations,
properties, dividend policy and capitalization, among other
things, make such changes as are deemed appropriate and continue
to seek to identify strategic alternatives to maximize
stockholder value. If the merger is not consummated for any
reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction
acceptable to HLTH or WebMD will be offered or that their
respective businesses and operations will not be adversely
affected. As discussed herein, HLTH currently is in the process
of pursuing the sale of its Porex business. If the proposed sale
is successful and the merger is not completed, the only
operating business of HLTH will be WebMD. HLTH may seek to
acquire other businesses using cash or securities as
consideration from time to time.
Approval
of the Merger
WebMD
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement and Approve the
Merger
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting
power of the outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock entitled
to vote thereon at the WebMD Annual Meeting is required to adopt
the
80
merger agreement and approve the merger. In the merger
agreement, HLTH has agreed to vote all of the shares of WebMD
Class B Common Stock that it holds in favor of the adoption
of the merger agreement and the approval of the merger. Since
HLTH controls approximately 96% of the voting power of the
outstanding WebMD Common Stock, it can cause the merger to be
approved by WebMD stockholders without the vote of any other
stockholder.
HLTH
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement and Approve the
Merger
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of HLTH Common Stock entitled to vote thereon
at the HLTH Annual Meeting is required to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the merger.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the Board of Directors, you
should be aware that certain of HLTHs and WebMDs
executive officers and directors may have interests in the
transaction that are different from, or are in addition to, the
interests of HLTHs and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders
generally. The WebMD Special Committee, WebMD Board of Directors
and HLTH Board of Directors were aware of these potential or
actual conflicts of interest and considered them along with
other matters when they determined to recommend the merger. See
Background of the Merger.
HLTH
Directors
Certain members of the HLTH Board of Directors are affiliated
with WebMD and have actual or potential conflicts of interest in
evaluating the merger. Each of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F.
Dimick and James V. Manning is a director of WebMD; and Martin
J. Wygod is a director, Chairman of the Board and an executive
officer of WebMD. For additional information on these members of
the Board of Directors, see HLTH Directors and Executive
Officers.
WebMD
Directors
Certain members of the WebMD Board of Directors are affiliated
with HLTH and have conflicts of interest in evaluating the
merger. Each of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and
James V. Manning is a director of HLTH; and Martin J. Wygod is a
director, Chairman of the Board and an executive officer of
HLTH. For additional information on these members of the Board
of Directors, see WebMD Directors and Executive
Officers.
HLTH
Executive Officers
Certain executive officers of HLTH are affiliated with WebMD.
Mark D. Funston is the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of HLTH and the Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of WebMD; and Martin J. Wygod is
Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH
and Chairman of the Board of WebMD. For additional information
on these executive officers, see HLTH Directors and
Executive Officers.
WebMD
Executive Officers
Certain executive officers of WebMD are affiliated with HLTH.
Mark D. Funston is the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of HLTH and the Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of WebMD; and Martin J. Wygod is
Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH
and Chairman of the Board of WebMD. Mr. Gattinella, Chief
Executive Officer and President of WebMD, because of that
position, is also deemed to be an executive officer of HLTH. For
additional information on these executive officers, see
WebMD Directors and Executive Officers.
81
Employment
with the Surviving Corporation Post-Merger
It is expected that, immediately following the effective time of
the merger, the officers of WebMD immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger will be officers of the surviving
corporation and will generally have the same positions they held
at WebMD. Additionally, since WebMDs initial public
offering, it has relied on HLTH to provide it with certain
services for its business pursuant to a services agreement it
entered into with HLTH in September 2005. Certain of the HLTH
executives that have provided WebMD with services under the
service agreement will be employed by WebMD after the
consummation of the merger.
The merger does not constitute a change in control under
employment agreements with HLTHs and WebMDs
executive officers. However, in connection with the merger, it
is anticipated that Mr. Cameron and Mr. Mele,
HLTHs Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel,
respectively, will undergo changes in title and position that
may permit them to terminate employment with WebMD (as
HLTHs successor) for good reason if they choose to do so.
See Employment Arrangements below for
additional information.
Martin J. Wygod currently serves as Chairman of the Board of
both HLTH and WebMD, which are executive officer positions, and
as acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH. Mr. Wygods
employment agreement had previously contemplated that he would
serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of WebMD
following the merger. However, as described below under
Employment Agreements Martin J.
Wygod, HLTH, WebMD and Mr. Wygod have agreed that he
will serve as the Executive Chairman of the Board of WebMD
following the merger pursuant to the terms of his amended
employment contract.
Directors
of the Surviving Corporation Post-Merger
The Board of Directors of both WebMD and HLTH at the effective
time of the merger will, from and after the effective time of
the merger, be the directors of the surviving corporation, until
their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their
earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of WebMD.
Treatment
of Grants Under HLTH and WebMD Equity Plans
HLTH Stock Options. Outstanding stock options
of HLTH will be assumed by WebMD without any further action on
the part of HLTH or the option holders; these assumed options
will become options to acquire WebMD Common Stock. The number of
shares of WebMD Common Stock underlying each converted stock
option will be equal to (i) the number of shares of HLTH
Common Stock underlying each HLTH stock option immediately prior
to the effective time of the merger multiplied by
(ii) 0.4444. The exercise price per share of WebMD Common
Stock with respect to each converted stock option will equal to
the quotient of (x) the exercise price per share of the
HLTH Common Stock subject to each HLTH stock option immediately
before effective time of the merger divided by (y) 0.4444.
82
The following directors and executive officers of HLTH
and/or WebMD
hold options to purchase the following number of shares of HLTH
Common Stock that, if still outstanding at the closing of the
merger, would be assumed by WebMD and converted into options to
purchase WebMD Common Stock, as described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Kevin M. Cameron
|
|
|
4,002,168
|
|
|
$
|
10.22
|
&n |