DEFM14A
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
     
o
  Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ
  Definitive Proxy Statement
o
  Definitive Additional Materials
o
  Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
HLTH CORPORATION
 
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
     
þ
  No fee required.
 
   
o
  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
  (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
  (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
  (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
  (5)   Total fee paid:
 
     
o
  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
 
     
o
  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1)   Amount Previously Paid:
 
  (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
  (3)   Filing Party:
 
  (4)   Date Filed:
 


Table of Contents

     
(HLTH LOGO)   (WebMD LOGO)
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407
  111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
 
To the Stockholders of HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp.:
 
On June 17, 2009, HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp. entered into an agreement and plan of merger. This joint proxy statement/prospectus describes the merger contemplated by that agreement, including the reasons the merger was proposed, the negotiation process that led to the merger and other background information. We are sending you this joint proxy statement/prospectus and related materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the boards of directors of WebMD and HLTH for use at their Annual Meetings of Stockholders to be held on October 23, 2009. At the Annual Meetings, the stockholders of WebMD and HLTH will each be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to approve the merger of HLTH and WebMD, as well as the other proposals to be considered at the Annual Meetings. These proposals are discussed in greater detail in the remainder of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We urge you to carefully read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference into it. In particular, see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 28.
 
If the merger is approved by stockholders of HLTH and WebMD and the other conditions specified in the merger agreement are met:
 
  •  HLTH will merge into WebMD, with WebMD continuing as the surviving company and HLTH will cease to exist as a separate entity;
 
  •  each outstanding share of HLTH Common Stock will be converted into 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock;
 
  •  the WebMD Class B Common Stock held by HLTH will be canceled; and
 
  •  holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will continue to own their existing shares, which will not be affected by the merger, except that such shares will no longer be referred to as “Class A” and except as otherwise described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
 
Because of HLTH’s ownership of a controlling interest in WebMD, the WebMD Board of Directors formed a special committee to consider possible transactions between the companies. Each of the members of the special committee is an independent director and none of its members serves as a director of HLTH. The special committee retained its own financial and legal advisors and, with the assistance of those advisors, negotiated the terms and conditions of the merger with HLTH. After this negotiation, and upon receipt of the opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc., an independent investment banking firm retained by the special committee, that the merger consideration to be received by holders of HLTH Common Stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of HLTH, WebMD and their respective affiliates), the special committee unanimously recommended to the WebMD Board of Directors that the merger be approved and that the WebMD board recommend that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote in favor of the merger. Based on the recommendation of the special committee, the WebMD Board of Directors approved the merger and recommends that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the merger at the WebMD Annual Meeting.
 
The HLTH Board of Directors believes that the merger is fair to and in the best interests of the stockholders of HLTH and recommends that HLTH’s stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the merger at the HLTH Annual Meeting.
 
In the merger agreement, HLTH has agreed to vote all of the shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock that it holds in favor of approving the merger. Since HLTH controls approximately 96% of the voting power of all the outstanding WebMD Common Stock, it can cause the merger to be approved by WebMD without the vote of any other stockholder. However, HLTH and WebMD cannot complete the merger unless a majority of the outstanding shares of HLTH Common Stock approves it.
 
All HLTH and WebMD stockholders are cordially invited to attend their company’s Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the applicable Annual Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope as promptly as possible.
 
     
-s- Martin J. Wygod   -s- Wayne T. Gattinella
Martin J. Wygod
Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer,
HLTH Corporation
  Wayne T. Gattinella
Chief Executive Officer and President,
WebMD Health Corp.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in connection with the merger, approved or disapproved of the transaction, passed upon the merits or fairness of the transaction or determined if this joint proxy statement/prospectus is adequate, accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated September 14, 2009 and is first being mailed to stockholders on or about September 18, 2009.


Table of Contents

 
SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
This joint proxy statement/prospectus includes information also set forth in documents filed by WebMD and HLTH with the SEC, and those documents include information about each company that is not included in or delivered with this document. This joint proxy statement/prospectus also incorporates by reference important business and financial information about WebMD and HLTH from documents filed by WebMD and HLTH with the SEC that are not included in or delivered with this document. You can obtain any of those documents filed with the SEC from WebMD or HLTH, as the case may be, or through the SEC at the SEC’s web site. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. Stockholders of WebMD or HLTH may obtain documents filed with the SEC or documents incorporated by reference in this document, when available, free of cost, by directing a request to the appropriate company at:
 
     
HLTH Corporation
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone Number: (201) 414-2002
  WebMD Health Corp.
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone Number: (212) 624-3817
 
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure timely delivery, you must do so at least five business days before the date of the Annual Meetings. This means you must request this information no later than September 18, 2009. WebMD or HLTH, as the case may be, will mail properly requested documents to requesting stockholders by first class mail, or another equally prompt means, within one business day after receipt of such requests.
 
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from that contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated September 14, 2009. You should not assume that the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than that date, except to the extent that such information is contained in an additional document filed with the SEC under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date of the HLTH and WebMD annual meetings and is incorporated by reference herein. Neither the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to HLTH or WebMD stockholders nor the issuance by WebMD of WebMD Common Stock in connection with the merger will create any implication to the contrary.
 
This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Information contained in this document regarding HLTH has been provided by HLTH and information contained in this document regarding WebMD has been provided by WebMD.
 
See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 255.


Table of Contents

 
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
 
 
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD OCTOBER 23, 2009
 
 
 
To the Stockholders of WebMD Health Corp.:
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Annual Meeting of Stockholders of WebMD Health Corp. will be held at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time, on October 23, 2009, at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004, for the following purposes:
 
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 17, 2009, between HLTH Corporation and WebMD, and to approve the transactions contemplated by that agreement, including the merger.
 
2. To elect three Class I directors, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier resignation or removal.
 
3. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify and approve an amendment to WebMD’s Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock issuable under that Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to a total of 15,600,000 shares.
 
4. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as WebMD’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
 
5. To consider and transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
 
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on September 8, 2009 will be entitled to vote at this meeting. The stock transfer books will not be closed.
 
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope as promptly as possible.
 
By Order of the Board of Directors
of WebMD Health Corp.
 
Douglas W. Wamsley
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
 
New York, New York
September 14, 2009
 
 
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
 
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING,
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY.
 


Table of Contents

HLTH CORPORATION
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407-1361
 
 
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD OCTOBER 23, 2009
 
 
 
To the Stockholders of HLTH Corporation:
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Annual Meeting of Stockholders of HLTH Corporation will be held at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time, on October 23, 2009, at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004, for the following purposes:
 
1. To consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger, dated as of June 17, 2009, between WebMD Health Corp. and HLTH, and to approve the transactions contemplated by that agreement, including the merger.
 
2. To elect three Class II directors, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier resignation or removal.
 
3. To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as HLTH’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, in the event that the merger is not completed.
 
4. To consider and transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
 
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on September 8, 2009 will be entitled to vote at this meeting. The stock transfer books will not be closed.
 
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope as promptly as possible.
 
By Order of the Board of Directors
of HLTH Corporation
 
Charles A. Mele
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
 
Elmwood Park, New Jersey
September 14, 2009
 
 
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
 
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING,
PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY.
 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
    v  
    v  
    1  
    1  
    1  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    9  
    9  
    9  
    10  
    10  
    10  
    11  
    11  
    11  
    12  
    12  
    12  
    13  
    13  
    14  
    14  
    14  
    14  
    15  
    17  
    19  
    26  
    27  
    28  
    28  
    30  
    33  
    47  
    51  
    52  
    54  
    54  
    59  
    61  
    61  


i


Table of Contents

         
    Page
 
    63  
    64  
    71  
    79  
    80  
    81  
    87  
    87  
    87  
    90  
    90  
    90  
    92  
    92  
    92  
    94  
    94  
    94  
    96  
    96  
    97  
    99  
    99  
    101  
    103  
    104  
    105  
    106  
    107  
    107  
    107  
    108  
    108  
    109  
    109  
    109  
    110  
    111  
    116  
    116  
    117  
    117  
    117  
    117  
    117  


ii


Table of Contents

         
    Page
 
    118  
    119  
    119  
    119  
    120  
    121  
    124  
    126  
    127  
    128  
    133  
    137  
    175  
    177  
    181  
    183  
    183  
    185  
    185  
    185  
    185  
    186  
    187  
    187  
    188  
    188  
    189  
    190  
    193  
    195  
    196  
    197  
    201  
    205  
    237  
    241  
    250  
    252  
    252  
    254  
    254  
    254  


iii


Table of Contents

         
    Page
 
    255  
    256  
 
         
List of Annexes
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       


iv


Table of Contents

 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are or may be, forward-looking statements. For example, the following types of statements are, or may be, forward-looking statements:
 
  •  projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or forecasts of the financial or operational performance of HLTH, WebMD or the combined company or of the value of assets or liabilities of HLTH, WebMD or the combined company;
 
  •  HLTH’s, WebMD’s or the combined company’s objectives, plans or goals; and
 
  •  conditions or events following the completion of the proposed merger of HLTH and WebMD.
 
These forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations concerning future results and events and can generally be identified by the use of expressions such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “likely,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “future,” “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” and other similar words or phrases, as well as statements in the future tense.
 
Examples of forward-looking statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:
 
  •  expected benefits from the merger;
 
  •  HLTH’s and WebMD’s ability to satisfy the conditions and terms of the merger, and to execute the merger in the estimated timeframe, if at all;
 
  •  expected governance of WebMD upon completion of the merger; and
 
  •  the anticipated tax consequences of the merger.
 
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results, performance and achievements expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, among others, those disclosed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and in other reports filed by WebMD and HLTH with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
 
The forward-looking statements included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are made only as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, neither WebMD nor HLTH undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
 
2008 ANNUAL REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
 
Annexes B-1 through B-4 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus constitute portions of the 2008 Annual Report required to be distributed with this joint proxy statement/prospectus to stockholders of HLTH. Annexes C-1 through C-5 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus constitute portions of the 2008 Annual Report required to be distributed with this joint proxy statement/prospectus to stockholders of WebMD. For 2008, the companies will not be distributing stand-alone Annual Report documents. The Annexes, together with other information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, contain all of the information that HLTH and WebMD would have included in their respective Annual Reports, but in a format that they believe is more useful to stockholders of both HLTH and WebMD in connection with this year’s Annual Meetings.


v


Table of Contents

 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
 
The Annual Meetings of Stockholders
 
Q: When and where are the Annual Meetings of Stockholders?
 
A: Both the HLTH Annual Meeting and the WebMD Annual Meeting will take place on October 23, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004.
 
*  *  *  *  *
 
The Merger
 
Q: What will HLTH stockholders receive in the merger?
 
A: If the merger is completed, each outstanding share of HLTH Common Stock will be converted into 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock.
 
WebMD will not issue any fractional shares of WebMD Common Stock in exchange for shares of HLTH Common Stock. Instead, each holder of a fractional share interest will be paid an amount in cash (without interest) equal to the fractional share interest multiplied by the closing price of a share of WebMD Class A Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the last trading day immediately preceding the effective time of the merger. For more information on the treatment of fractional shares, see “The Merger Agreement — Effect on Capital Stock; Merger Consideration; Exchange of Certificates — Exchange of Certificates.”
 
Q: What will happen to shares of WebMD Common Stock in the merger?
 
A: If the merger is completed, the shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock, all of which are held by HLTH, will be canceled. Holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will continue to own their existing shares, which will not be converted or cancelled in the merger. However, since there will no longer be any WebMD Class B Common Stock outstanding following the effective time of the merger, the merger agreement provides for the certificate of incorporation of WebMD to be amended at the time of the merger to reflect there being only one class of WebMD Common Stock outstanding, all shares of which will have the same rights, and it will no longer be referred to as “Class A” after the merger. Based on 9.7 million shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock and 104.0 million shares of HLTH Common Stock outstanding as of August 31, 2009, there would be approximately 55.9 million shares of WebMD Common Stock outstanding on a pro forma basis, giving effect to the merger as of that date. The only further changes being made to WebMD’s certificate of incorporation merely give effect, at the time of the merger, to provisions of the existing certificate of incorporation that would automatically have become effective whenever HLTH ceased to own a majority of the voting power of WebMD’s outstanding Common Stock. For a description of the changes to be made to the certificate of incorporation of WebMD in connection with the merger, see “Description of WebMD Capital Stock — Amendments to Amended WebMD Charter and Amended and Restated By-laws.”
 
Q: What will happen to HLTH in the merger?
 
A: Upon effectiveness of the merger, the separate corporate existence of HLTH will cease and WebMD will continue as the surviving company in the merger and will succeed to and assume all the rights and obligations of HLTH.
 
Q: Why was the merger proposed?
 
A: The key goals for the merger include allowing HLTH’s stockholders to participate directly in the ownership of WebMD, while eliminating HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD and the inefficiencies associated with having two separate public companies, increasing the ability of WebMD to raise capital and to obtain financing, and enhancing the liquidity of WebMD Common Stock by significantly increasing the public float. The boards of directors of HLTH and WebMD both believe that, as a result of the negotiations between HLTH and a special committee of the WebMD Board of Directors, which we refer to


1


Table of Contents

as the WebMD Special Committee, the merger agreement provides for a transaction that meets these goals and is fair to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. The Board of Directors of HLTH also believes that the terms of the merger are fair to the holders of HLTH Common Stock. A detailed discussion of the background of, and reasons for, the merger are described in “The Merger — Background of the Merger,” “The Merger — HLTH’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger” and “The Merger — WebMD’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger.”
 
Q: Are there risks I should consider in deciding whether to vote for the merger?
 
A. Yes. A description of some of the risks that should be considered in connection with the merger are included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus under the heading “Risk Factors.”
 
Q: Why did the WebMD Board of Directors appoint a Special Committee to negotiate with HLTH?
 
A: Because of HLTH’s ownership of a controlling interest in WebMD, the Board of Directors of WebMD formed the WebMD Special Committee to consider and negotiate a possible transaction between the two companies to be proposed by HLTH. Each of the members of the WebMD Special Committee is an independent director and none of its members serves as a director of HLTH. The WebMD Special Committee retained its own financial and legal advisors and, with the assistance of those advisors, negotiated the terms and conditions of the merger with HLTH.
 
Q: Do the boards of directors of HLTH and WebMD recommend voting “FOR” the proposals to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger at the Annual Meetings?
 
A: Yes. Based on the recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee, taking into consideration the fairness opinion of the WebMD Special Committee’s financial advisor, a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex F, the Board of Directors of WebMD approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and declared the merger agreement advisable, and recommends that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the WebMD Annual Meeting.
 
Additionally, taking into consideration the fairness opinion of its financial advisor, a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex E, the Board of Directors of HLTH also approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and declared the merger agreement advisable, and recommends that HLTH stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the HLTH Annual Meeting.
 
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated November 7, 2007 between HLTH and Raymond James, HLTH paid Raymond James a fee of $100,000 upon delivery of its fairness opinion to the HLTH Board of Directors in connection with the merger. The engagement letter also provides that Raymond James will be paid a $1,000,000 fee if the merger is completed. HLTH also previously paid a retainer fee of $50,000 and an opinion fee of $500,000 to Raymond James in connection with the terminated 2008 merger transaction between HLTH and WebMD. HLTH negotiated this fee structure so that it would not have to pay the additional $1,000,000 fee if the merger were not consummated. At the time HLTH’s Board of Directors requested delivery of a fairness opinion from Raymond James in connection with the merger, HLTH’s Board understood the potential incentives to issue a fairness opinion created by the applicable fee structure. However, HLTH’s Board believed that Raymond James would apply appropriate professional judgment in connection with its delivery of such opinion, regardless of the fee structure.
 
Q: How do HLTH’s and WebMD’s directors and executive officers intend to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger at the Annual Meetings?
 
A: As of September 8, 2009, which is the record date for both the HLTH and WebMD Annual Meetings, the directors and executive officers of HLTH held and are entitled to vote, in the aggregate, shares of HLTH Common Stock representing approximately 8.4% of the outstanding shares, and the directors and executive officers of WebMD held and are entitled to vote, in the aggregate, shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock representing approximately 0.4% of the aggregate voting power of the outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock. HLTH and WebMD each believe that its directors and executive officers intend to vote all of their


2


Table of Contents

shares of HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Class A Common Stock “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger at the respective Annual Meetings. In addition, HLTH has agreed in the merger agreement to vote the WebMD Class B Common Stock it owns, which represents approximately 96% of the combined voting power of all WebMD Common Stock, in favor of the merger.
 
Q: When do you expect to complete the merger?
 
A: If HLTH and WebMD receive the required stockholder approvals at their respective Annual Meetings to be held on October 23, 2009, they expect to complete the merger shortly after those meetings.
 
Q: How will the combined company’s business be different?
 
A: The combined company will consist of WebMD’s business and may also include HLTH’s Porex business, which HLTH is currently in the process of divesting. HLTH currently has no operating businesses other than Porex and WebMD.
 
Q: What will be the composition of the Board of Directors of WebMD and HLTH following the merger?
 
A: Immediately following the merger, the directors of HLTH who are not currently directors of WebMD will become directors of WebMD and, together with WebMD’s existing directors, those directors will constitute the Board of Directors of the surviving corporation until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.
 
Q: What will happen to HLTH stock options and shares of HLTH restricted stock?
 
A. In addition to providing for the merger consideration to be paid to HLTH stockholders, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for the treatment of HLTH stock options and HLTH restricted stock. At the time of the merger, HLTH stock options and shares of HLTH restricted stock will be treated as follows:
 
• Stock Options:  All outstanding stock options of HLTH will be assumed by WebMD without any further action on the part of HLTH or the option holders. These assumed options will become options to acquire WebMD Common Stock. The new exercise price and number of shares of WebMD Common Stock subject to the assumed options will be determined based on the exchange ratio. For a more detailed description, see “The Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger — Treatment of Grants Under HLTH and WebMD Equity Plans — HLTH Stock Options.”
 
• Restricted Stock:  Each outstanding share of restricted stock of HLTH will be converted into 0.4444 shares of restricted WebMD Common Stock. For a more detailed description, see “The Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger — Treatment of Grants Under HLTH and WebMD Equity Plans — HLTH Restricted Stock Awards.”
 
Q: What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger?
 
A: The merger is intended to constitute a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, so that a U.S. holder (as defined in “The Merger — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger”) whose shares of HLTH Common Stock are exchanged in the merger solely for shares of WebMD Common Stock will not recognize gain or loss, except with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of WebMD Common Stock. The merger is conditioned on the receipt of legal opinions that for U.S. federal income tax purposes the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of WebMD and HLTH will be a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code.
 
For a more complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger, see “The Merger — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.” Tax matters are complicated and the consequences of the merger to you will depend on your particular facts and circumstances. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the merger to you, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax laws.


3


Table of Contents

 
Q: What stockholder vote is required to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger at the Annual Meetings?
 
A: To be approved at the HLTH Annual Meeting, the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated by that agreement, including the merger, must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding HLTH Common Stock entitled to vote thereon.
 
To be approved at the WebMD Annual Meeting, the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding WebMD Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. The terms of the merger agreement do not require that at least a majority of the holders of WebMD Common Stock other than HLTH and the officers and directors of HLTH, WebMD and their respective affiliates (who we refer to as the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders) approve the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger. HLTH has agreed, in the merger agreement, to vote in favor of that proposal at the WebMD Annual Meeting. HLTH’s ownership of all of the outstanding shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock represents approximately 96% of the combined voting power of the two classes of WebMD Common Stock. As a result, HLTH is able, acting alone, to cause the approval of the proposal regarding the merger at the WebMD Annual Meeting.
 
Q: What if I do not vote my HLTH shares or WebMD shares on the matters relating to the merger?
 
A: If you are a HLTH stockholder or WebMD stockholder and you fail to respond with a vote or instruct your broker how to vote on the merger proposal, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. If you respond and abstain from voting, your proxy will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. Unless the shares are held in a brokerage account, if holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock sign, date and send their proxy and do not indicate how they want to vote, their proxies will be voted “FOR” the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger. If your shares are held in a brokerage account and you do not provide your bank or broker with instructions on how to vote your street name shares, your bank or broker will not be permitted to vote them with respect to the proposal regarding the merger. This results in a “broker non-vote.” A broker non-vote with respect to the proposal regarding the merger will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal.
 
Q: Should I send in my HLTH share certificates now?
 
A: No. If the merger is completed, written instructions will be sent to stockholders of HLTH with respect to the exchange of their share certificates for the merger consideration.
 
Q: Are stockholders entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights?
 
A: The holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock and of HLTH Common Stock will not be entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights with respect to any matter to be voted upon at the Annual Meetings.
 
*  *  *  *  *
 
Other Proposals to be Voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting
 
Q: What are the proposals to be voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting, other than the proposal regarding the merger?
 
A: At the WebMD Annual Meeting, holders of WebMD Common Stock will be asked:
 
• to elect three Class I directors, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier resignation or removal;
 
• to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify and approve an amendment to WebMD’s Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the WebMD 2005 Plan, to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock issuable under the WebMD 2005 Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to a total of 15,600,000 shares; and


4


Table of Contents

 
• to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as WebMD’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
 
Holders of WebMD Common Stock will also be asked to consider and transact such other business as may properly come before the WebMD Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
 
Q: What stockholder vote is required to approve the items to be voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting, other than the merger?
 
A: With respect to the WebMD Annual Meeting:
 
• election of directors is by a plurality of the votes cast at the WebMD Annual Meeting with respect to the election; accordingly, the three nominees receiving the greatest number of votes for their election will be elected;
 
• in order to be approved, the proposal to amend the WebMD 2005 Plan to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock issuable under the WebMD 2005 Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to a total of 15,600,000 shares, must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares present or represented at the WebMD Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter; and
 
• in order to be approved, the proposal regarding ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.
 
HLTH’s ownership of all outstanding shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock represents approximately 96% of the combined voting power of the two classes of WebMD Common Stock. As a result, HLTH is able, acting alone, to cause the approval of all proposals submitted for a vote at the WebMD Annual Meeting. HLTH has indicated that it intends to vote in favor of the amendment to the WebMD 2005 Plan and the election of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning and in favor of ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.
 
Q: How does the WebMD board recommend stockholders vote on the proposals to be voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting, other than the merger?
 
A: The WebMD Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the election of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning as Class I directors and vote “FOR” the proposals to amend the WebMD 2005 Plan and to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.
 
*  *  *  *  *
 
Other Proposals to be Voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting
 
Q: What are the proposals to be voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting, other than the proposal regarding the merger?
 
A: At the HLTH Annual Meeting, holders of HLTH Common Stock will be asked:
 
• to elect three Class II directors, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier resignation or removal; and
 
• to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as HLTH’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, in the event that the merger is not completed.
 
Holders of HLTH Common Stock will also be asked to consider and transact such other business as may properly come before the HLTH Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.


5


Table of Contents

 
Q: What stockholder vote is required to approve the items to be voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting, other than the merger?
 
A: With respect to the HLTH Annual Meeting:
 
• election of directors is by a plurality of the votes cast at the HLTH Annual Meeting with respect to the election; accordingly, the three nominees receiving the greatest number of votes for their election will be elected; and
 
• in order to be approved, the proposal regarding ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.
 
Q: How does the HLTH Board of Directors recommend stockholders vote on the proposals to be voted on at the HLTH Annual Meeting, other than the merger?
 
A: The HLTH Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the election of Paul A. Brooke, James V. Manning and Martin J. Wygod as Class II directors and vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.
 
*  *  *  *  *
 
General Matters
 
Q: What do I need to do now?
 
A: We urge you to read this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully, including its annexes, as well as the documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You also may want to review the documents referenced under “Where You Can Find More Information” and consult with your accounting, legal and tax advisors.
 
Q: How do I vote my shares?
 
A: Holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock may indicate how they want to vote on their proxy card and then sign, date and mail their proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that their shares may be represented at the WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as applicable. Please note that if you are a stockholder of both HLTH and WebMD, you will be receiving two separate mailings that contain the same joint proxy statement/prospectus, but two different proxy cards: one for the WebMD Annual Meeting and one for the HLTH Annual Meeting. Please complete, sign, date and return all proxy cards you receive in order to ensure that your shares are voted at the WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as applicable. Holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock may also attend their respective company’s meeting in person instead of submitting a proxy.
 
Unless the shares are held in a brokerage account, if holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock sign, date and send their proxy and do not indicate how they want to vote, their proxies will be voted “FOR” the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger and “FOR” all other proposals to be voted on at the respective company’s Annual Meeting. If the shares are held in a brokerage account, please see the answer to the next question.
 
If holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock either fail to return their proxy card (and do not vote in person at the meeting) or if they “ABSTAIN” with respect to the proposal regarding the merger, the effect will be the same as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal. With respect to the election of directors, failure to return a proxy card or withholding your vote will result in fewer votes being received by the nominees, but will not affect whether the nominees receive a plurality of the votes. With respect to all other proposals to be voted on at the WebMD or HLTH Annual Meeting:
 
• shares held by holders of shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock, as applicable, who fail to return their proxy card and do not attend the meeting in person will not be


6


Table of Contents

counted as present or represented at the meeting and will have no effect on whether those proposals are approved;
 
• abstentions will be treated as shares that are present or represented at the meeting, but will not be counted in favor of that proposal and, accordingly, will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” those proposals.
 
Q: If my WebMD Class A Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock is held in a brokerage account or in “street name,” will my broker vote my shares for me?
 
A: If you do not provide your bank or broker with instructions on how to vote your street name shares, your bank or broker will not be permitted to vote them with respect to the proposal regarding the merger or with respect to the proposal, at the WebMD Annual Meeting, regarding the amendment of the WebMD 2005 Plan. This results in a “broker non-vote.”
 
These “broker non-votes” will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum since the bank or broker has the discretion to vote on election of directors and ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. A broker non-vote with respect to the proposal regarding the merger will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” such proposal since approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. A broker non-vote with respect to the amendment of the WebMD 2005 Plan will result in the shares not being considered present or represented at the meeting for purposes of that proposal and, accordingly, will have no impact on the outcome of the vote with respect to that proposal.
 
You should, therefore, provide your bank or broker with instructions on how to vote your shares or arrange to attend the WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as the case may be, and vote your shares in person to avoid a broker non-vote. You are urged to utilize telephone or Internet voting if your bank or broker has provided you with the opportunity to do so. See the relevant voting instruction form for instructions. If your bank or broker holds your shares and you attend the Annual Meeting in person, you should bring a letter from your bank or broker identifying you as the beneficial owner of the shares and authorizing you to vote your shares at the meeting.
 
Q: What constitutes a quorum?
 
A. A quorum is present if a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is present or represented. Broker non-votes and abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.
 
Q: Can I attend the WebMD Annual Meeting and vote my shares in person?
 
A. Yes. All holders WebMD Common Stock, including stockholders of record and stockholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to attend the WebMD Annual Meeting. Holders of record of WebMD Common Stock as of the record date can vote in person at the WebMD Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be able to vote in person at the WebMD Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the WebMD Annual Meeting, you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership and you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. WebMD reserves the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership or without proper photo identification.
 
Q: Can I attend the HLTH Annual Meeting and vote my shares in person?
 
A: Yes. All holders of HLTH Common Stock, including stockholders of record and stockholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to attend the HLTH Annual Meeting. Holders of record of HLTH common stock as of the record date can vote in person at the HLTH Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be able to vote in person at the HLTH Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the HLTH Annual Meeting,


7


Table of Contents

you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership and you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. HLTH reserves the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership or without proper photo identification.
 
Q: What do I do if I want to change my vote?
 
A: You may change your vote at any time before the vote takes place at the WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as the case may be. To do so, you may either complete and submit a new proxy card or send a written notice stating that you would like to revoke your proxy. In addition, you may elect to attend the WebMD Annual Meeting or the HLTH Annual Meeting, as the case may be, and vote in person, as described above.
 
Q: Who can I contact with any additional questions?
 
A: You may call the Investor Relations departments of WebMD or HLTH at:
 
     
WebMD Health Corp.
  HLTH Corporation
111 Eighth Avenue   669 River Drive, Center 2
New York, New York 10011   Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407
(212) 624-3817   (201) 414-2002
 
You may also contact HLTH and WebMD’s proxy solicitor at:
 
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders call toll-free: (888) 750-5834
Banks and Brokers call collect: (212) 750-5833
 
Q: Where can I find more information about the companies?
 
A: You can find more information about WebMD and HLTH in the documents described under “Where You Can Find More Information.”


8


Table of Contents

 
SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights selected information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all the information that is important to you. To fully understand the proposals to approve the merger to be voted on at the WebMD Annual Meeting and the HLTH Annual Meeting, and for a more complete description of the terms of the merger, you should read carefully this entire document, including the appendices, as well as the documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and the other documents to which we have referred you. For information on how to obtain the documents that we have filed with the SEC, see “Where You Can Find More Information.”
 
WebMD (page 92)
 
WebMD Health Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a leading provider of health information services to consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, employers and health plans through its public and private online portals and health-focused publications.
 
  •  Public Portals.  WebMD’s public portals for consumers enable them to obtain health and wellness information (including information on specific diseases or conditions), check symptoms, locate physicians, store individual healthcare information, receive periodic e-newsletters on topics of individual interest and participate in online communities with peers and experts. WebMD’s public portals for physicians and healthcare professionals make it easier for them to access clinical reference sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical information, learn about new treatment options, earn continuing medical education credit and communicate with peers. WebMD also publishes WebMD the Magazine, a consumer magazine distributed to physician office waiting rooms. WebMD’s public portals generate revenue primarily through the sale of advertising and sponsorship products, as well as continuing medical education services. The sponsors and advertisers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and consumer products companies. WebMD also provides e-detailing promotion and physician recruitment services for use by pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies.
 
  •  Private Portals.  WebMD’s private portals enable employers and health plans to provide their employees and plan members with access to personalized health and benefit information and decision-support technology that helps them make more informed benefit, provider and treatment choices. WebMD provides related services for use by such employees and members, including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic health coaching. WebMD generates revenue from its private portals through the licensing of these portals to employers and health plans either directly or through distributors.
 
WebMD Class A Common Stock, which has one vote per share, began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “WBMD” on September 29, 2005 and now trades on a successor market, the Nasdaq Global Select Market. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, HLTH Corporation owns all 48,100,000 shares of WebMD’s Class B Common Stock, which has five votes per share. As of August 31, 2009, the Class B Common Stock owned by HLTH represents approximately 83.2% of WebMD’s outstanding Common Stock; and, since WebMD Class B Common Stock has five votes per share and WebMD Class A Common Stock has one vote per share, HLTH’s ownership represents approximately 96% of the combined voting power of WebMD’s outstanding Common Stock.
 
WebMD’s executive offices are located at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011, and its telephone number is (212) 624-3700.
 
HLTH (page 92)
 
HLTH Corporation is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in December 1995 and commenced operations in January 1996 as Healtheon Corporation. HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD is described above. HLTH also owns the subsidiaries that constitute HLTH’s Porex business. Porex develops, manufactures and distributes proprietary porous plastic products and components used in healthcare, industrial and consumer


9


Table of Contents

applications. Porex’s customers include both end-users of its finished products, as well as manufacturers that include Porex components in their products. Porex is an international business with manufacturing operations in North America, Europe and Asia and customers in more than 75 countries. HLTH is in the process of divesting Porex and, accordingly, has reflected Porex as discontinued operations in its financial statements. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of HLTH included as Annex B-1 to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
 
HLTH Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “HLTH” on February 11, 1999 and now trades under that symbol on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. As of August 31, 2009, there were 105,105,340 shares of HLTH Common Stock outstanding (including 1,121,850 unvested shares of restricted HLTH Common Stock granted to employees of HLTH).
 
HLTH’s executive offices are located at 669 River Drive, Center 2, Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407-1361, and its telephone number is (201) 703-3400.
 
The WebMD Annual Meeting (page 185)
 
WebMD will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time, on October 23, 2009, at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004. At this meeting, stockholders of WebMD will be asked (1) to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, (2) to elect three Class I directors, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier resignation or removal, (3) to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify and approve an amendment to WebMD’s Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock issuable under the Plan by 1,100,000 shares, to a total of 15,600,000 shares and (4) to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as WebMD’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
 
You can vote at the WebMD Annual Meeting only if you owned WebMD Common Stock at the close of business on September 8, 2009, which is the record date for that meeting.
 
The HLTH Annual Meeting (page 117)
 
HLTH will hold its Annual Meeting of Stockholders at 9:30 a.m., Eastern time, on October 23, 2009, at The Ritz-Carlton New York, Battery Park, Two West Street, New York, New York 10004. At this meeting, stockholders of HLTH will be asked (1) to consider and vote on the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, (2) to elect three Class II directors of HLTH, each to serve a three-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012 or until his successor is elected and has qualified or his earlier resignation or removal, and (3) to consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as HLTH’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, in the event that the merger is not completed.
 
You can vote at the HLTH Annual Meeting only if you owned HLTH Common Stock at the close of business on September 8, 2009, which is the record date for that meeting.
 
Terms of the Merger (page 96)
 
Under the terms of the merger agreement between HLTH and WebMD, HLTH will merge with and into WebMD and each outstanding share of HLTH Common Stock will be converted into 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock. Upon effectiveness of the merger, the separate corporate existence of HLTH will cease and WebMD will succeed to and assume all the rights and obligations of HLTH in accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (which we refer to as the General Corporation Law). In the merger, the certificate of incorporation of WebMD will be amended and restated to eliminate the dual class structure of the Common Stock and to provide for a maximum number of shares of WebMD Common Stock of 650,000,000 (an amount equal to the sum of the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock and


10


Table of Contents

of Class B Common Stock under the existing certificate of incorporation). The only further changes being made to WebMD’s certificate of incorporation merely give effect, at the time of the merger, to provisions of the existing certificate of incorporation that would automatically have become effective whenever HLTH ceased to own a majority of the voting power of WebMD’s outstanding Common Stock. In the merger, existing shares of WebMD’s Class B Common Stock will be canceled. Existing shares of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock will remain outstanding as shares of WebMD Common Stock and all shares of WebMD Common Stock will have the same rights, including voting rights. After the merger, WebMD Common Stock will continue to be quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, under the symbol “WBMD.”
 
Effect of the Merger on HLTH’s Convertible Notes (page 94)
 
Following the merger, WebMD as the surviving corporation will assume the obligations of HLTH under HLTH’s 31/8% Convertible Notes due September 1, 2025 and HLTH’s 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 15, 2023 (which we collectively refer to as the Convertible Notes). In the event a holder of the Convertible Notes converts those Convertible Notes into shares of HLTH Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the applicable indenture prior to the effective time of the merger, those shares would be treated in the merger like all other shares of HLTH Common Stock. In the event a holder of the Convertible Notes converts those Convertible Notes pursuant to the applicable indenture following the effective time of the merger, those Convertible Notes would be converted into the merger consideration payable in respect of the HLTH shares into which such Convertible Notes would have been convertible prior to the merger. Based on the exchange ratio for the merger and the terms of the applicable indentures, the 31/8% Convertible Notes would have a conversion price of approximately $35.03 per share of WebMD Common Stock and the 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes would have a conversion price of approximately $34.63 per share of WebMD Common Stock.
 
Purposes and Reasons for the Merger (pages 59 and 61)
 
The key goals for the merger include allowing HLTH’s stockholders to participate directly in the ownership of WebMD, while eliminating HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD and the inefficiencies associated with having two separate public companies, and enhancing the liquidity of WebMD Common Stock by significantly increasing the public float. The boards of directors of HLTH and WebMD both believe that, as result of the negotiations between HLTH and the WebMD Special Committee, the merger agreement provides for a transaction that meets these goals and is fair to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. The Board of Directors of HLTH also believes that the terms of the merger are fair to the holders of HLTH Common Stock. A detailed discussion of the background of, and reasons for, the merger are described in “The Merger — Background of the Merger,” “The Merger — HLTH’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger” and “The Merger — WebMD’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger.”
 
Conditions to the Merger (page 103)
 
The merger will be completed only if specific conditions, including, among others, the following, are met or waived by the parties to the merger agreement:
 
  •  the registration statement that includes this joint proxy statement/prospectus has been declared effective by the SEC;
 
  •  the HLTH and WebMD proposals to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger have been approved by the requisite votes of the HLTH and WebMD stockholders, as applicable;
 
  •  the absence of any governmental law or order that would make the merger illegal or would otherwise prohibit the consummation of the merger;
 
  •  the shares of WebMD Common Stock to be issued in the merger have been approved for listing on the Nasdaq Global Select Market;
 
  •  the representations and warranties of the parties to the merger agreement are true and correct, except for inaccuracies that would not have a material adverse effect;


11


Table of Contents

 
  •  the requisite covenants of each of the parties have been performed in all material respects in accordance with the merger agreement;
 
  •  the receipt by each of HLTH and WebMD of a legal opinion from its respective counsel with respect to certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger;
 
  •  since the date of the merger agreement, there has not been a material adverse effect relating to HLTH, on the one hand, or WebMD, on the other hand.
 
Ownership of WebMD After the Merger
 
Currently, the holders of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock hold approximately 17% of WebMD’s combined issued and outstanding shares and have approximately 4% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares. In connection with the merger, WebMD’s Class B Common Stock will cease to be outstanding, and WebMD’s certificate of incorporation will be amended and restated to eliminate the dual class structure of its shares. If the merger is completed, holders of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock immediately before the merger will hold approximately 17% of WebMD’s issued and outstanding Common Stock immediately following the merger (based on shares outstanding as of August 31, 2009); this will also represent approximately 17% of the voting power of the issued and outstanding Common Stock, since there will be only one class of stock outstanding, and each share will have one vote. The ownership of 17% following the merger assumes that 48.1 million shares of WebMD currently held by HLTH are replaced by approximately 46.2 million new shares of WebMD Common Stock, which will be issued at the rate of 0.4444 shares of WebMD for each outstanding share of HLTH.
 
The WebMD Special Committee
 
Because of HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD, the Board of Directors of WebMD formed the WebMD Special Committee to consider and negotiate a possible transaction with HLTH. Each of the members of the WebMD Special Committee is an independent director and neither of its members serves as a director of HLTH. The members of the WebMD Special Committee are Jerome C. Keller and Stanley S. Trotman. The WebMD Special Committee reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the merger as well as the opinion of an independent investment banking firm retained by the WebMD Special Committee that the consideration to be paid in the merger by WebMD to holders of HLTH Common Stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
 
Recommendations of the WebMD Special Committee and the Boards of Directors (pages 61 and 63)
 
  •  Special Committee Recommendation.  The WebMD Special Committee unanimously recommended to the Board of Directors of WebMD that the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger were advisable and in the best interests of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, and that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, should be approved.
 
  •  WebMD Board Recommendation.  Based on the recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee, taking into consideration the fairness opinion of the WebMD Special Committee’s financial advisor, a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex F, the Board of Directors of WebMD unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and recommends that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the WebMD Annual Meeting. The WebMD Board of Directors also recommends that, at the Annual Meeting, WebMD stockholders vote: “FOR” the election of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning as Class I directors of WebMD; “FOR” the ratification and approval of the proposed amendment to the Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and “FOR” the ratification and appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as WebMD’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.


12


Table of Contents

 
  •  HLTH Board Recommendation.  Taking into consideration the fairness opinion of its financial advisor, a copy of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex E, the Board of Directors of HLTH unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and recommends that HLTH stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, at the HLTH Annual Meeting. The HLTH Board of Directors also recommends that, at the HLTH Annual Meeting, HLTH stockholders vote: “FOR” the election of Paul A. Brooke, James V. Manning and Martin J. Wygod as Class II directors of HLTH; and “FOR” the ratification and appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to serve as HLTH’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009, in the event that the merger is not completed.
 
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger (page 81)
 
In considering the recommendation of the HLTH Board of Directors, you should be aware that certain of HLTH’s executive officers and directors may have interests in the transaction that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of HLTH’s unaffiliated stockholders. In considering the recommendation of the WebMD Board of Directors, you should be aware that certain of WebMD’s executive officers and directors may have interests in the transaction that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. The WebMD Special Committee, the WebMD Board of Directors and the HLTH Board of Directors were aware of these potential or actual conflicts of interest and considered them along with other matters when they determined to recommend the merger. See “The Merger — Background of the Merger.”
 
HLTH’s and WebMD’s directors at the effective time of the merger will become directors of the surviving corporation.
 
It is expected that the officers of WebMD immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be officers of the surviving corporation and will generally have the same positions they held at WebMD. Martin J. Wygod currently serves as Chairman of the Board of both HLTH and WebMD, which are executive officer positions, and as acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH. Mr. Wygod’s employment agreement previously contemplated that he would serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of the surviving corporation following the merger. However, in July 2009, HLTH, WebMD and Mr. Wygod agreed that he will serve as the Executive Chairman of the Board of the surviving corporation following the merger. See “HLTH Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements with the HLTH Named Executive Officers — Martin J. Wygod” for additional information.
 
Certain of HLTH’s executives that have provided WebMD with services under a service agreement will also become employed by the surviving corporation after the consummation of the merger. The merger does not constitute a change in control under employment agreements with HLTH’s and WebMD’s executive officers. However, in connection with the merger, it is anticipated that Kevin Cameron and Charles Mele, HLTH’s Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel, respectively, will undergo changes in title and position that may permit them to terminate employment with the surviving corporation as HLTH’s successor for good reason and as a result be eligible to receive certain payments and benefits. See “— HLTH Executive Compensation — Employment Agreements with the HLTH Named Executive Officers” for additional information.
 
For more information on the effect of the merger on the current directors and executive officers of HLTH and WebMD, see “The Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger.”
 
Anticipated Accounting Treatment of the Merger (page 90)
 
The merger will be accounted for as a reverse merger. WebMD will be issuing WebMD Common Stock to effect the merger and it will survive as the publicly listed company after completion of the merger. However, because HLTH controlled WebMD prior to the merger and because HLTH’s shareholders, as a group, will own the majority of the total voting power of WebMD’s voting securities following the merger, FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations does not apply to the transaction, which will be accounted for as a merger of entities under common control, whereby, for accounting purposes, HLTH will be


13


Table of Contents

treated as the acquirer and WebMD will be treated as the acquired company. Accordingly, after the merger is completed, WebMD’s historical financial statements for periods prior to the completion of the merger will reflect the historical financial information of HLTH.
 
FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, requires that changes in a parent company’s ownership interest, while the parent company retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary, shall be accounted for as equity transactions. Although the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock (the noncontrolling interest in WebMD) are not exchanging their shares in the merger, the common control merger accounting will require the transaction to be presented as if HLTH acquired the noncontrolling interest in WebMD. Accordingly, the deemed acquisition by HLTH of the portion of WebMD that it does not currently own will be accounted for as an equity transaction.
 
For additional information, see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”
 
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 104)
 
Even if the stockholders of WebMD and HLTH approve the WebMD and HLTH proposals to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, WebMD and HLTH can jointly agree to terminate the merger agreement by mutual written consent. The merger agreement also contains provisions addressing the circumstances under which either WebMD or HLTH may terminate the merger agreement. In the event of termination of the merger agreement pursuant to any such provision, the merger agreement does not provide for any termination fee to be paid by the terminating party. The merger agreement does, however, provide that all expenses incurred by either party and the WebMD Special Committee in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will be paid by HLTH. For more information on the circumstances under which WebMD or HLTH may terminate the merger agreement, see “The Merger Agreement — Termination.”
 
Dissenters’ Rights (pages 90, 119 and 188)
 
The holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock and of HLTH Common Stock will not be entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights with respect to any matter to be voted on at the Annual Meetings.
 
Listing of WebMD Common Stock (page 87)
 
After the merger, the shares of WebMD Common Stock will continue to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “WBMD.”
 
Market Price and Dividend Information (page 26)
 
WebMD Class A Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “WBMD.” HLTH Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “HLTH.” The following table shows the closing sale prices of WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 17, 2009, the last full trading day prior to the public announcement of the proposed merger, and on September 11, 2009, the last practicable trading day prior to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This table also shows the implied value of the merger consideration proposed for each share of HLTH Common Stock, which we calculated by multiplying the closing price of WebMD Class A Common Stock on those dates by the exchange ratio of 0.4444.
 
                         
                Implied Value of
 
                One Share of
 
    WebMD Class A
    HLTH Common
    HLTH Common
 
    Common Stock     Stock     Stock  
 
June 17, 2009
  $ 28.21     $ 11.76     $ 12.54  
September 11, 2009
  $ 32.17     $ 14.14     $ 14.30  
 


14


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF HLTH
 
The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated financial information for HLTH. The selected historical information is presented as of June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004. HLTH derived the historical information for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from its audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. HLTH derived the historical information for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 from its unaudited consolidated financial statements for those periods. In the opinion of HLTH management, the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements incorporated by reference herein for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared on a basis consistent with HLTH’s audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for these periods. The operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2009 of HLTH or the combined company.
 
The selected information set forth below should be read in conjunction with HLTH’s consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, as well as the disclosure under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in Annex B-1 and Annex B-2, respectively, to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in HLTH’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The historical results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future results.
 
                                                         
    Six Months Ended
       
    June 30,(1)     Years Ended December 31,(1)(5)  
    2009     2008     2008     2007     2006(2)(3)(4)     2005     2004  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
                                                       
Revenue
  $ 188,895     $ 166,614     $ 373,462     $ 319,232     $ 899,585     $ 842,660     $ 802,444  
Cost of operations
    75,794       62,895       135,138       114,000       542,723       525,405       510,661  
Sales and marketing
    54,358       50,047       106,080       91,035       116,258       101,939       111,834  
General and administrative
    43,851       43,627       88,053       102,661       130,056       116,589       105,042  
Depreciation and amortization
    14,059       13,989       28,410       27,808       44,073       43,013       38,611  
Interest income
    4,220       19,998       35,300       42,035       32,339       21,527       18,708  
Interest expense
    12,317       13,110       26,428       25,887       25,472       18,442       19,249  
Gain on repurchases of convertible notes
    10,120                                      
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
          538,024       538,024                          
Impairment of auction rate securities
          60,108       60,108                          
Restructuring
                7,416                          
Gain on 2006 EBS Sale
                      399       352,297              
Other (expense) income, net
    (821 )     (4,810 )     (5,949 )     3,406       (4,252 )     (27,965 )     (13,308 )
                                                         
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax (benefit) provision
    2,035       476,050       489,204       3,681       421,387       30,834       22,447  
Income tax (benefit) provision
    (467 )     26,171       26,638       (9,053 )     50,033       (2,461 )     3,995  
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
          4,007       4,007       28,566       763              
                                                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations
    2,502       453,886       466,573       41,300       372,117       33,295       18,452  
Consolidated (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (12,767 )     (6 )     94,682       (18,048 )     393,527       34,170       18,159  
                                                         
Consolidated net (loss) income inclusive of noncontrolling interest
    (10,265 )     453,880       561,255       23,252       765,644       67,465       36,611  
(Loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (997 )     2,774       (1,032 )     (10,667 )     (405 )     (775 )      
                                                         
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
  $ (11,262 )   $ 456,654     $ 560,223     $ 12,585     $ 765,239     $ 66,690     $ 36,611  
                                                         
Amounts attributable to HLTH stockholders:
                                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 509     $ 456,711     $ 465,725     $ 31,845     $ 371,844     $ 32,725     $ 18,452  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
    (11,771 )     (57 )     94,498       (19,260 )     393,395       33,965       18,159  
                                                         
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
  $ (11,262 )   $ 456,654     $ 560,223     $ 12,585     $ 765,239     $ 66,690     $ 36,611  
                                                         
Basic (loss) income per common share:
                                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.00     $ 2.50     $ 2.66     $ 0.18     $ 1.33     $ 0.10     $ 0.06  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
    (0.11 )     (0.00 )     0.54       (0.11 )     1.41       0.10       0.05  
                                                         
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
  $ (0.11 )   $ 2.50     $ 3.20     $ 0.07     $ 2.74     $ 0.20     $ 0.11  
                                                         
Diluted (loss) income per common share:
                                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.00     $ 2.04     $ 2.19     $ 0.16     $ 1.20     $ 0.09     $ 0.06  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
    (0.11 )     (0.01 )     0.42       (0.10 )     1.18       0.10       0.05  
                                                         
Net (loss) income attributable to HLTH stockholders
  $ (0.11 )   $ 2.03     $ 2.61     $ 0.06     $ 2.38     $ 0.19     $ 0.11  
                                                         
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net (loss) income per common share:
                                                       
Basic
    102,178       182,399       174,928       179,330       279,234       341,747       320,080  
                                                         
Diluted
    104,514       228,209       220,127       188,763       331,642       352,852       333,343  
                                                         


15


Table of Contents

                                                 
    As of
                               
    June 30,
    As of December 31,(1)(5)  
    2009(1)     2008     2007     2006(2)(3)     2005     2004  
    (In thousands)  
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
                                               
Cash, cash equivalents and investments
  $ 828,456     $ 918,268     $ 830,120     $ 651,464     $ 427,433     $ 617,493  
Working capital (excluding assets and liabilities of discontinued operations)
    551,544       633,462       860,181       617,101       397,555       43,681  
Total assets
    1,393,768       1,501,734       1,651,481       1,469,795       2,213,558       2,309,419  
Convertible notes, net of discount
    488,474       614,018       605,776       598,121       590,987       649,999  
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock
                      98,768       98,533       98,299  
Noncontrolling interest in WHC
    149,058       134,223       131,353       101,860       43,096        
HLTH stockholders’ equity
    491,627       496,698       642,809       422,853       1,118,237       1,214,876  
 
 
(1) On July 22, 2008, HLTH completed the sale of its ViPS segment and in March 2009 and February 2008 HLTH decided to divest WebMD’s Little Blue Book print directory business and the Porex segment, respectively. Accordingly, the selected consolidated financial data has been reclassified to reflect the historical results for these businesses as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
 
(2) For the year ended December 31, 2006, the consolidated financial position and results of operations reflect the sale of a 52% interest in HLTH’s Emdeon Business Services segment (which is refer to as EBS), as of November 16, 2006. Accordingly, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 excludes the assets and liabilities of EBS and includes an investment in EBS Master LLC accounted for under the equity method of accounting related to HLTH’s 48% ownership, and the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes the operations of EBS for the period January 1, 2006 through November 16, 2006 and our 48% equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC from November 17, 2006 through December 31, 2006.
 
(3) On September 14, 2006, HLTH completed the sale of the Emdeon Practice Services segment. Accordingly, this selected consolidated financial data has been reclassified to reflect the historical results of the Emdeon Practice Services segment as a discontinued operation for this and all prior periods presented.
 
(4) On January 1, 2006, HLTH adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “(Revised 2004): Share Based Payment” that resulted in additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense beginning in 2006 and subsequent periods.
 
(5) The selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, do not reflect the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” for HLTH’s 31/4% Convertible Notes, which were outstanding during those periods and were fully redeemed or converted to equity during the year ended December 31, 2005.


16


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF WEBMD
 
The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated financial information for WebMD. The selected historical information is presented as of June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004. WebMD derived the historical information for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from its audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. WebMD derived the historical information for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 from its unaudited consolidated financial statements for those periods. In the opinion of WebMD management, the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements incorporated by reference herein for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared on a basis consistent with WebMD’s audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for these periods. The operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2009 of WebMD or the combined company.
 
The selected information set forth below should be read in conjunction with WebMD’s consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, as well as the disclosure under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in Annex C-1 and Annex C-2, respectively, to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and WebMD’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The historical results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future results.
 
                                                         
    Six Months Ended
       
    June 30,(1)     Years Ended December 31,(1)  
    2009     2008     2008     2007(2)     2006(3)(4)     2005     2004  
                (In thousands, except per share data)              
 
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
                                                       
Revenue
  $ 188,895     $ 166,654     $ 373,542     $ 319,493     $ 239,434     $ 154,560     $ 120,287  
Cost of operations
    75,794       62,895       135,138       114,000       98,692       63,077       45,123  
Sales and marketing
    54,358       50,047       106,080       91,035       73,344       49,026       44,976  
General and administrative
    29,865       27,691       56,635       59,326       50,060       27,937       20,461  
Depreciation and amortization
    13,741       13,759       27,921       26,785       17,154       10,113       5,094  
Interest income
    1,899       5,803       10,452       12,378       5,099       1,790        
Impairment of auction rate securities
          27,406       27,406                          
Restructuring
                2,910                          
                                                         
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax provision (benefit)
    17,036       (9,341 )     27,904       40,725       5,283       6,197       4,633  
Income tax provision (benefit)
    6,847       7,933       2,211       (17,644 )     3,571       1,367       970  
                                                         
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    10,189       (17,274 )     25,693       58,369       1,712       4,830       3,663  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (5,290 )     291       1,009       7,515       824       1,735       1,754  
                                                         
Net income (loss)
  $ 4,899     $ (16,983 )   $ 26,702     $ 65,884     $ 2,536     $ 6,565     $ 5,417  
                                                         
Basic income (loss) per common share:
                                                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 0.17     $ (0.30 )   $ 0.45     $ 1.02     $ 0.03     $ 0.10     $ 0.08  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
    (0.09 )     0.01       0.01       0.13       0.02       0.03       0.03  
                                                         
Net income (loss)
  $ 0.08     $ (0.29 )   $ 0.46     $ 1.15     $ 0.05     $ 0.13     $ 0.11  
                                                         
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
                                                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 0.17     $ (0.30 )   $ 0.44     $ 0.98     $ 0.03     $ 0.10     $ 0.08  
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
    (0.09 )     0.01       0.01       0.12       0.01       0.03       0.03  
                                                         
Net income (loss)
  $ 0.08     $ (0.29 )   $ 0.45     $ 1.10     $ 0.04     $ 0.13     $ 0.11  
                                                         
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing net income (loss) per common share:
                                                       
Basic
    57,625       57,664       57,717       57,184       56,145       50,132       48,100  
                                                         
Diluted
    58,245       57,664       58,925       59,743       58,075       50,532       48,100  
                                                         
 


17


Table of Contents

                                                 
    As of
                               
    June 30,
    As of December 31,(1)  
    2009(1)     2008     2007(2)     2006(3)     2005     2004  
                (In thousands)              
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
                                               
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
    373,208     $ 325,222     $ 294,653     $ 54,150     $ 153,777     $ 3,456  
Working capital (excluding assets and liabilities of discontinued operations)
    220,429       186,571       290,614       184,966       152,337       9,011  
Total assets
    772,454       755,932       720,173       619,965       376,889       146,496  
Other long-term liabilities
    7,803       8,334       9,210       7,912       7,010        
Stockholders’ equity
    647,589       633,718       606,755       496,109       295,955       98,560  
 
 
(1) In March 2009, Board of Directors of WebMD decided to divest the Little Blue Book print directory business. Accordingly, this selected consolidated financial data has been reclassified to reflect the historical results of the Little Blue Book print directory business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
 
(2) As of December 31, 2007, WebMD completed the sale of its medical reference publications business. Accordingly, this selected consolidated financial data has been reclassified to reflect historical results of our medical reference publications business as discontinued operations for this and all prior periods presented.
 
(3) During 2006, WebMD acquired Subimo LLC on December 15, 2006, Medsite Inc. on September 11, 2006, Summex Corporation on June 13, 2006 and eMedicine.com Inc. on January 17, 2006. The results of operations of these acquired companies have been included in our financial statements from the respective acquisition dates.
 
(4) On January 1, 2006, WebMD adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “(Revised 2004): Share-Based Payment” that resulted in additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense beginning in 2006.

18


Table of Contents

 
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are based on the historical financial statements of WebMD and HLTH after giving effect to the merger as a purchase of the minority interest in WebMD by HLTH, as more fully described in Note 1 below.
 
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 assume the merger between WebMD and HLTH occurred on January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 assumes the merger had occurred on June 30, 2009.
 
As more fully described in Note 2 below, the historical consolidated financial statements of HLTH have been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly attributable to the merger, (2) factually supportable, and (3) with respect to the statements of operations, expected to have a continuing impact on the consolidated results. No adjustment has been made to reflect anticipated reductions in corporate expenses following the merger.
 
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the financial condition or results of operations of future periods or the financial condition or results of operations that actually would have been realized had the entities been a single entity as of or for the periods presented. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information should be read together with the historical financial statements and related notes of WebMD and HLTH that each have filed with the SEC and that are included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.


19


Table of Contents

 
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
(In thousands)
 
                         
         
Pro Forma
       
    Historical HLTH     Adjustments     Pro Forma  
 
ASSETS
Current assets:
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 555,247     $     $ 555,247  
Accounts receivable
    78,674             78,674  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    48,974             48,974  
Assets of discontinued operations
    124,945             124,945  
                         
Total current assets
    807,840             807,840  
Investments
    273,209             273,209  
Property and equipment, net
    56,864             56,864  
Goodwill
    202,104             202,104  
Intangible assets, net
    28,888             28,888  
Other assets
    24,863             24,863  
                         
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 1,393,768     $     $ 1,393,768  
                         
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
                       
Accrued expenses
  $ 45,090     $ 3,500 (b)   $ 48,590  
Deferred revenue
    86,261             86,261  
Liabilities of discontinued operations
    113,588             113,588  
                         
Total current liabilities
    244,939       3,500       248,439  
1.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2023
    264,583             264,583  
31/8% convertible notes due 2025, net of discount of $26,409
    223,891             223,891  
Other long-term liabilities
    19,670             19,670  
Equity:
                       
Company stockholders’ equity
    491,627       145,558 (a)(b)     637,185  
Noncontrolling interest in WebMD
    149,058       (149,058 )(a)      
                         
Total equity
    640,685       (3,500 )     637,185  
                         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
  $ 1,393,768     $     $ 1,393,768  
                         


20


Table of Contents

 
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
                         
         
Pro Forma
       
    Historical HLTH     Adjustments     Pro Forma  
 
Revenue
  $ 188,895     $     $ 188,895  
Cost of operations
    75,794             75,794  
Sales and marketing
    54,358             54,358  
General and administrative
    43,851             43,851  
Depreciation and amortization
    14,059             14,059  
Interest income
    4,220             4,220  
Interest expense
    12,317             12,317  
Gain on repurchase of convertible notes
    10,120             10,120  
Other expense
    821             821  
                         
Income from continuing operations before income
                       
tax benefit
    2,035             2,035  
Income tax benefit
    (467 )           (467 )
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations
    2,502             2,502  
Consolidated loss from discontinued operations
    (12,767 )           (12,767 )
                         
Consolidated net loss inclusive of noncontrolling interest
    (10,265 )           (10,265 )
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (997 )     997 (c)      
                         
Net loss attributable to Company stockholders
  $ (11,262 )   $ 997     $ (10,265 )
                         
Amounts attributable to Company stockholders:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 509     $ 1,993 (c)   $ 2,502  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (11,771 )     (996 )(c)     (12,767 )
                         
Net loss attributable to Company stockholders
  $ (11,262 )   $ 997     $ (10,265 )
                         
Income from continuing operations per common share (Note 3):
                       
Basic
  $ 0.00             $ 0.05  
                         
Diluted
  $ 0.00             $ 0.04  
                         
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing income
                       
per common share (Note 3):
                       
Basic
    102,178               54,933  
                         
Diluted
    104,514               56,591  
                         


21


Table of Contents

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
                         
         
Pro Forma
       
    Historical HLTH     Adjustments     Pro Forma  
 
Revenue
  $ 373,462     $     $ 373,462  
Cost of operations
    135,138             135,138  
Sales and marketing
    106,080             106,080  
General and administrative
    88,053             88,053  
Depreciation and amortization
    28,410             28,410  
Interest income
    35,300             35,300  
Interest expense
    26,428             26,428  
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
    538,024             538,024  
Impairment of auction rate securities
    60,108             60,108  
Restructuring
    7,416             7,416  
Other expense, net
    5,949             5,949  
                         
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision
    489,204             489,204  
Income tax provision
    26,638             26,638  
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
    4,007             4,007  
                         
Consolidated income from continuing operations
    466,573             466,573  
Consolidated income from discontinued operations
    94,682             94,682  
                         
Consolidated net income inclusive of noncontrolling interest
    561,255             561,255  
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (1,032 )     1,032 (c)      
                         
Net income attributable to Company stockholders
  $ 560,223     $ 1,032     $ 561,255  
                         
Amounts attributable to Company stockholders:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 465,725     $ 848 (c)   $ 466,573  
Income from discontinued operations
    94,498       184 (c)     94,682  
                         
Net income attributable to Company stockholders
  $ 560,223     $ 1,032     $ 561,255  
                         
Income from continuing operations per common share (Note 3):
                       
Basic
  $ 2.66             $ 5.34  
                         
Diluted
  $ 2.19             $ 4.44  
                         
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing income from continuing operations per common share (Note 3):
                       
Basic
    174,928               87,355  
                         
Diluted
    220,127               108,649  
                         


22


Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
1.   Basis of Presentation
 
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are based on the historical financial statements of WebMD and HLTH after giving effect to the merger, which is being accounted for as a reverse merger. WebMD is the legal acquirer in the merger as it will be issuing its equity to effect the merger and it will survive as the publicly listed company after completion of the merger. However, because HLTH controlled WebMD prior to the merger and because HLTH’s shareholders as a group will own the majority of the voting rights of WebMD following the merger, FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations does not apply to the transaction, which will be accounted for as a merger of entities under common control, whereby, for accounting purposes, HLTH will be treated as the acquirer and WebMD will be treated as the acquired company. Accordingly, after the merger is completed, WebMD’s historical financial statements for periods prior to the completion of the merger will reflect the historical financial information of HLTH.
 
FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, requires that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary, shall be accounted for as equity transactions. Although the non-HLTH stockholders of WebMD are not exchanging their shares in the merger, the common control merger accounting requires the transaction to be presented as if HLTH acquired the noncontrolling interest in WebMD. Accordingly, the deemed acquisition by HLTH of the portion of WebMD it does not currently own (the noncontrolling interest) will be accounted for as an equity transaction.
 
2.   Pro Forma Adjustments
 
The pro forma adjustments related to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 assume the merger took place on June 30, 2009 and are as follows:
 
(a) Reflects the elimination of the noncontrolling interest in WebMD.
 
(b) Reflects the accrual of estimated transaction expenses, primarily representing costs of financial and legal advisors. These costs will be charged to equity, consistent with the acquisition of the noncontrolling interest.
 
The pro forma adjustments to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 assume the merger took place on January 1, 2008 and are as follows:
 
(c) Reflects the elimination of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in WebMD.
 
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements exclude any adjustments to reflect anticipated reductions in corporate expenses following the merger.
 
3.   Pro Forma Income Per Share
 
The weighted average number of shares used to calculate pro forma basic and diluted income per share is based on the weighted average number of basic and diluted shares of WebMD Common Stock outstanding during the pro forma periods, adjusted for (i) the retirement of the 48,100 shares of WebMD’s Class B Common Stock held by HLTH and (ii) the issuance of new WebMD shares equal to the weighted average number of basic and diluted shares of HLTH Common Stock outstanding during the pro forma periods, multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.4444. Additionally, the convertible notes were dilutive to the calculation of pro forma earnings per share during the year ended December 31, 2008, and accordingly, the numerator and


23


Table of Contents

 
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
denominator were adjusted as if the convertible notes were converted during this period. The following table presents the calculation of pro forma basic and diluted income per common share:
 
                 
    Six Months
       
    Ended
    Year Ended
 
    June 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
 
Numerator:
               
Pro forma income from continuing operations — Basic
  $ 2,502     $ 466,573  
Interest expense on convertible notes, net of tax
          15,855  
                 
Pro forma income from continuing operations — Diluted
  $ 2,502     $ 482,428  
                 
Denominator:
               
Pro forma weighted average shares — Basic
    54,933       87,355  
Employee stock options and warrants
    1,658       2,622  
Convertible notes
          18,672  
                 
Pro forma weighted average shares — Diluted
    56,591       108,649  
                 
Pro forma income per share — Basic
  $ 0.05     $ 5.34  
                 
Pro forma income per share — Diluted
  $ 0.04     $ 4.44  
                 
 
The following table summarizes the components of the weighted average number of shares used to calculate pro forma basic and diluted income per share (all share amounts are reflected in terms of weighted averages during the periods presented):
 
                 
    Six Months
       
    Ended
    Year Ended
 
    June 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
 
WebMD common shares
    57,625       57,717  
WebMD Class B common shares being retired
    (48,100 )     (48,100 )
HLTH common shares converted (Note d)
    45,408       77,738  
                 
Pro forma shares outstanding — basic
    54,933       87,355  
                 
Options and warrants:
               
WebMD (historical)
    620       1,208  
HLTH converted (Note d)
    1,038       1,414  
                 
      1,658       2,622  
                 
Convertible notes (Note d)
          18,672  
                 
Pro forma shares outstanding — diluted
    56,591       108,649  
                 


24


Table of Contents

 
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
(d) The following table summarizes the weighted average shares outstanding of HLTH, multiplied by the exchange ratio:
 
                                         
    Historical Weighted Average Number of HLTH Shares Outstanding           Pro Forma Weighted Average Number of WebMD Shares Outstanding  
    Six Months
                Six Months
       
    Ended
    Year Ended
          Ended
    Year Ended
 
    June 30, 2009     December 31, 2008     Exchange ratio     June 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
 
Common shares — basic
    102,178       174,928       0.4444       45,408       77,738  
                                         
Diluted shares — options and warrants
    2,336       3,183       0.4444       1,038       1,414  
Diluted shares — convertible notes
          42,016       0.4444             18,672  
                                         
Total diluted shares
    2,336       45,199               1,038       20,086  
                                         


25


Table of Contents

 
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
 
WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low per share sale price of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock and HLTH’s Common Stock.
 
                                 
    WebMD     HLTH  
    High     Low     High     Low  
 
2006
                               
First Quarter
  $ 44.27     $ 28.55     $ 11.18     $ 8.32  
Second Quarter
  $ 47.30     $ 34.10     $ 12.44     $ 10.41  
Third Quarter
  $ 46.85     $ 34.25     $ 12.60     $ 11.45  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 41.71     $ 33.93     $ 12.78     $ 11.37  
2007
                               
First Quarter
  $ 57.28     $ 40.09     $ 16.23     $ 12.28  
Second Quarter
  $ 58.53     $ 46.07     $ 16.56     $ 13.72  
Third Quarter
  $ 58.65     $ 44.16     $ 15.25     $ 12.56  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 63.49     $ 38.73     $ 16.39     $ 12.93  
2008
                               
First Quarter
  $ 41.99     $ 23.15     $ 13.56     $ 9.52  
Second Quarter
  $ 35.40     $ 21.86     $ 12.62     $ 9.52  
Third Quarter
  $ 35.00     $ 23.80     $ 12.70     $ 10.73  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 29.99     $ 13.63     $ 11.36     $ 6.80  
2009
                               
First Quarter
  $ 25.20     $ 19.37     $ 12.00     $ 9.65  
Second Quarter
  $ 30.70     $ 20.15     $ 13.43     $ 10.11  
Third Quarter (through September 11, 2009)
  $ 34.43     $ 28.73     $ 15.20     $ 12.70  
 
On June 17, 2009, the last full trading day prior to the public announcement of the proposed merger, the closing price per share of WebMD Class A Common Stock quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $28.21 and the closing price per share of HLTH Common Stock quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $11.76. On September 11, 2009, the last practicable trading day prior to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the closing price per share of WebMD Class A Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $32.17 and the closing price per share of HLTH Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $14.14.
 
HLTH stockholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for WebMD Class A Common Stock prior to making any decision with respect to the merger. No assurance can be given concerning the market price for WebMD Common Stock before or after the date on which the merger is consummated. The market price for WebMD Common Stock will fluctuate between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the date on which the merger is consummated and thereafter.
 
Neither WebMD nor HLTH has ever declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock, and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of the merger agreement with WebMD prohibit HLTH from declaring or paying any dividends.


26


Table of Contents

 
COMPARATIVE SHARE DATA
 
The historical per share income (loss) from continuing operations and book value of WebMD and HLTH shown in the table below are derived from their unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the Six months ended June 30, 2009 and their audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. The pro forma comparative per share data for WebMD Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock was derived from the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus beginning on page 19. The pro forma book value per share information was computed as if the merger had been completed on June 30, 2009. You should read this information in conjunction with such pro forma financial statements and the related notes and with the historical financial information of WebMD and HLTH included or incorporated elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including WebMD’s and HLTH’s financial statements and related notes. The pro forma shares outstanding as of June 30, 2009 assumes that (x) 103,199,609 shares of HLTH Common Stock are converted based on an exchange ratio of 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock and (y) 57,715,851 shares of WebMD Common Stock are reduced by the 48,100,000 shares currently held by HLTH. The pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of actual results had the merger occurred during the periods indicated and is not necessarily indicative of future operations of the combined entity.
 
                         
    HLTH     WebMD     Pro Forma  
 
As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 (Unaudited)
                       
(Loss) income from continuing operations per common share:
                       
Basic
  $ 0.00     $ 0.17     $ 0.05  
Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ 0.17     $ 0.04  
Net book value per common share
  $ 4.76     $ 11.22     $ 11.49  
Shares outstanding as of June 30, 2009
    103,199,609       57,715,851       55,477,757  
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
                       
Income from continuing operations per common share:
                       
Basic
  $ 2.66     $ 0.45     $ 5.34  
Diluted
  $ 2.19     $ 0.44     $ 4.44  


27


Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
 
This section describes circumstances or events that could have a negative effect on HLTH’s and WebMD’s financial results or operations or that could change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of their businesses. The occurrence of one or more of the circumstances or events described below could have a material adverse effect on either or both companies’ financial condition, results of operations and cash flows or on the trading prices of the capital stock that WebMD or HLTH has issued or securities either company may issue in the future. The risks and uncertainties described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are not the only ones facing HLTH and WebMD. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to HLTH or WebMD or that HLTH and WebMD currently believe are immaterial may also adversely affect the respective companies’ business and operations.
 
 
 
 
Risks Related to the Merger for Holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock
 
In addition to the risk factors discussed in this section, holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will, if the merger is consummated, also become subject to the risks described below in the sections entitled “Other Risks Related to HLTH” and, unless Porex is sold prior to completion of the merger, “Risks Related to Porex.”
 
The merger will result in a substantial increase in the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock available for trading, which could depress the price of such stock and/or increase the volatility of the price of such stock, both before and after completion of the merger
 
Although the merger is expected to reduce the total number of outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock, the merger will greatly increase the number of such shares available for sale in the public markets. Currently, all 48,100,000 outstanding shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock are held by HLTH and do not trade in the public markets. As of August 31, 2009, approximately 9,710,000 shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock (the class traded publicly) were outstanding. Upon completion of the merger, the WebMD Class B Common Stock would be cancelled and would cease to be outstanding, but more than 46,210,000 new shares of WebMD Common Stock would be issued to holders of HLTH Common Stock and become immediately available for sale. Additional shares could become available for sale at or after that time depending upon:
 
  •  whether holders of options to purchase HLTH Common Stock exercise those options and the timing of such exercises; and
 
  •  whether holders of convertible notes issued by HLTH convert those notes and the timing of any such conversions.
 
Sales of large amounts of WebMD Common Stock could depress the market price of WebMD Common Stock. In addition, the potential that such sales may occur could depress prices even in advance of such sales. WebMD cannot predict the effect that the merger will have on the price of WebMD Common Stock, both before and after completion of the merger.
 
The merger is subject to closing conditions that, if not satisfied or waived, will result in the merger not being completed, which may cause the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock to decline
 
The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing, including the receipt of required approvals of the stockholders of HLTH and WebMD and receipt of opinions of counsel relating to tax matters. If any condition to the merger is not satisfied or, if permissible, waived, the merger will not be completed. Generally, waiver by WebMD of a condition to closing of the merger will require approval of the WebMD Special Committee that negotiated the transaction with HLTH. WebMD cannot predict what the effect on the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock would be if the merger is not able to be completed, but depending on market conditions at the time, it could result in a decline in that market price. In addition, if there is uncertainty regarding whether the merger will be completed (including uncertainty regarding whether the conditions to closing will be met), that could result in a decline in the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock or an increase in the volatility of that market price.


28


Table of Contents

In the event that HLTH does not sell Porex prior to the closing of the merger, WebMD would become exposed to the risks inherent in the ownership and disposition of Porex
 
HLTH has announced that it plans to divest its Porex business. However, the merger could be completed before the sale of such business is completed. In that case, WebMD (as the surviving company in the merger) would become the owner of that business and the sale process would continue. WebMD would then be subject to the risk that the proceeds from the sale of that business are less than expected and all other risks inherent in the ownership of that business. There can be no assurances regarding whether WebMD would be able to complete such sale or as to the timing or terms of such transaction and, if WebMD is unable to complete the sale of Porex, it could be required to reclassify the operations of Porex as continuing operations of WebMD. Even if HLTH has entered into an agreement with an acquirer with respect to the remaining business prior to completion of the merger, WebMD would be subject to the risk that the conditions to closing provided for in such agreement might not be met.
 
The financial results and operations of Porex could be adversely affected by the diversion of management resources to the sale process, including the efforts devoted to the sale process to date, and by uncertainty regarding the outcome of the process. For example, the uncertainty of who will own the business in the future could lead such business to lose or fail to attract employees, customers or business partners. This could adversely affect its operations and financial results and, as a result, the sale price that HLTH or WebMD may receive for such business.
 
Future results of the combined company may differ materially from the pro forma financial information presented in this document
 
Future results of the combined company may be materially different from those shown in the pro forma financial statements that are based on the historical results of WebMD and HLTH in conjunction with certain adjustments based on assumptions regarding the merger.
 
The fairness opinions obtained by WebMD and HLTH will not reflect changes in circumstances between the signing of the agreement and plan of merger and the merger
 
Neither WebMD nor HLTH has obtained updated opinions as of the date of this document from its financial advisors. By the time the merger is completed, changes in the operations and prospects of WebMD or HLTH, general market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of WebMD and HLTH, and on which each financial advisor’s opinion was based, may significantly alter the value of WebMD or HLTH or the prices of shares of WebMD Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock from those prices and values on June 17, 2009, the date each such opinion was delivered. Neither of the opinions speaks as of the time the merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date of such opinions. Because neither WebMD nor HLTH currently anticipates asking their respective financial advisors to update their respective opinions, neither of the opinions will address the fairness of the merger consideration or the exchange ratio from a financial point of view at the time the merger is completed. Each of the HLTH Board of Directors’ recommendation that HLTH stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger and the WebMD Board of Directors’ recommendation that WebMD stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger, however, is as of the date of this document. For a description of the opinions that WebMD and HLTH received from their respective financial advisors, see “The Merger — Opinion of HLTH’s Financial Advisor, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.” and “The Merger — Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.”
 
Following the merger, the utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards of WebMD and HLTH may be subject to additional limitations under the Code
 
HLTH and WebMD each have substantial accumulated net operating loss carryforwards (which we refer to as NOL carryforwards) and tax credits that will be available to be carried forward to future tax periods following the merger. On November 25, 2008, HLTH repurchased 83,699,922 shares of its common stock in a tender offer. The tender offer resulted in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of HLTH’s


29


Table of Contents

stock, as determined under rules prescribed by the Code and applicable Treasury regulations. As a result of this ownership change, there will be an annual limitation on the amount of the NOL carryforwards and tax credits that HLTH and WebMD may use to offset income in each tax year following the ownership change. The merger may increase the possibility of another such annual limitation. Because substantially all of HLTH’s and WebMD’s NOL carryforwards have already been reduced by a valuation allowance for financial accounting purposes, we would not expect an annual limitation on the utilization of the NOL carryforwards to significantly reduce the net deferred tax asset, although the timing of cash flows may be impacted to the extent any such annual limitation deferred the utilization of NOL carryforwards to future tax years.
 
 
Risks Related to the Merger for Holders of HLTH Common Stock
 
The merger will result in a substantial increase in the number of shares of WebMD Common Stock available for trading, which could depress the price of such stock and/or increase the volatility of the price of such stock, both before and after completion of the merger
 
Upon completion of the merger, shares of HLTH Common Stock will be converted into shares of WebMD Common Stock. Although the merger is expected to reduce the total number of outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock, the merger will greatly increase the number of such shares available for sale in the public markets. Currently, all 48,100,000 outstanding shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock are held by HLTH and do not trade in the public markets. As of August 31, 2009, approximately 9,710,000 shares of WebMD Class A Common Stock (the class traded publicly) were outstanding. Upon completion of the merger, the WebMD Class B Common Stock would be canceled and would cease to be outstanding, but more than 46,210,000 new shares of WebMD Common Stock would be issued to holders of HLTH Common Stock and become immediately available for sale. Additional shares could become available for sale at or after that time depending upon:
 
  •  whether holders of options to purchase HLTH Common Stock exercise those options and the timing of such exercises; and
 
  •  whether holders of convertible notes issued by HLTH convert those notes and the timing of any such conversions.
 
Sales of large amounts of WebMD Common Stock could depress the market price of WebMD Common Stock. In addition, the potential that such sales may occur could depress prices even in advance of such sales. HLTH cannot predict the effect that the merger will have on the price of WebMD Common Stock, either before or after completion of the merger.
 
As the market price of WebMD Common Stock may fluctuate, and the closing date of the merger is not yet ascertainable, HLTH stockholders cannot be certain of the market value of the WebMD common shares that they will receive in the merger
 
Upon completion of the merger, each share of HLTH Common Stock will be converted into merger consideration consisting of 0.4444 of a share of WebMD Common Stock. The market value of the merger consideration may vary from the closing price of WebMD Common Stock on the date we announced the merger, on the date that this document was mailed to HLTH stockholders, on the date of the HLTH Annual Meeting and on the date we complete the merger and thereafter. Any change in the market price of WebMD Common Stock prior to completion of the merger will affect the market value of the merger consideration that HLTH stockholders will receive upon completion of the merger. Accordingly, at the time of the HLTH Annual Meeting, HLTH stockholders will not know or be able to calculate the market value of the merger consideration they would receive upon completion of the merger. Neither company is permitted to terminate the merger agreement or resolicit the vote of HLTH stockholders solely because of changes in the market prices of either company’s stock. There will be no adjustment to the merger consideration for changes in the market price of either shares of WebMD Common Stock or shares of HLTH Common Stock. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, changes in


30


Table of Contents

our respective businesses, operations and prospects, and regulatory considerations. Many of these factors are beyond our control. You should obtain current market quotations for shares of HLTH Common Stock and for shares of WebMD Common Stock.
 
The merger is subject to closing conditions that, if not satisfied or waived, will result in the merger not being completed, which may cause the market price of HLTH Common Stock to decline
 
The merger is subject to customary conditions to closing, including the receipt of required approvals of the stockholders of HLTH and WebMD and receipt of opinions of counsel relating to tax matters. If any condition to the merger is not satisfied or, if permissible, waived, the merger will not be completed. Generally, waiver by WebMD of a condition to closing will require approval of the WebMD Special Committee that negotiated the transaction with HLTH. HLTH cannot predict what the effect on the market price of HLTH Common Stock would be if the merger is not able to be completed, but depending on market conditions at the time, it could result in a decline in that market price. In addition, if there is uncertainty regarding whether the merger will be completed (including uncertainty regarding whether the conditions to closing will be met), that could result in a decline in the market price of HLTH Common Stock or an increase in the volatility of that market price.
 
Future results of the combined company may differ materially from the pro forma financial information presented in this document
 
Future results of the combined company may be materially different from those shown in the pro forma financial statements that are based on the historical results of WebMD and HLTH in conjunction with certain adjustments based on assumptions regarding the merger.
 
The fairness opinions obtained by WebMD and HLTH will not reflect changes in circumstances between the signing of the agreement and plan of merger and the merger
 
Neither WebMD nor HLTH has obtained updated opinions as of the date of this document from its financial advisors. By the time the merger is completed, changes in the operations and prospects of WebMD or HLTH, general market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of WebMD and HLTH, and on which each financial advisor’s opinion was based, may significantly alter the value of WebMD or HLTH or the prices of shares of WebMD Common Stock or HLTH Common Stock from those prices and values on June 17, 2009, the date each such opinion was delivered. Neither of the opinions speaks as of the time the merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date of such opinions. Because neither WebMD nor HLTH currently anticipates asking their respective financial advisors to update their respective opinions, neither of the opinions will address the fairness of the merger consideration or the exchange ratio from a financial point of view at the time the merger is completed. Each of the HLTH Board of Directors’ recommendation that HLTH stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger and the WebMD Board of Directors’ recommendation that WebMD stockholders vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the agreement and plan of merger, however, is as of the date of this document. For a description of the opinions that WebMD and HLTH received from their respective financial advisors, see “The Merger — Opinion of HLTH’s Financial Advisor, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.” and “The Merger — Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.”
 
The receipt of shares of WebMD Common Stock in the merger may be taxable to HLTH shareholders
 
If the merger fails to qualify as a reorganization, the receipt of shares of WebMD Common Stock in the merger will be taxable to HLTH shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Additionally, HLTH would recognize gain or loss in respect to the transfer of its assets (including WebMD stock) to WebMD pursuant to the Merger. The merger is conditioned upon the receipt by HLTH and WebMD of tax opinions from Shearman & Sterling LLP (which we refer to as Shearman) and Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP (which we refer to as Cahill), respectively, dated as of the closing date of the merger that the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. These opinions will be based on the accuracy of certain factual representations and covenants made by WebMD and HLTH (including those contained in officer’s certificates to be provided by WebMD and HLTH at the time of closing), and on


31


Table of Contents

customary factual assumptions, limitations and qualifications. The tax opinions do not bind the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, and do not prevent the IRS from asserting a contrary opinion. In addition, if any of the representations or assumptions upon which the tax opinions are based are inconsistent with the actual facts, the merger might not qualify as a reorganization. For more information, see “The Merger — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.”
 
HLTH shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including any federal, state, local, foreign or other tax consequences, and any tax return filing or other reporting requirements.
 
Following the merger, the utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards of WebMD and HLTH may be subject to additional limitations under the Code
 
HLTH and WebMD each have substantial accumulated NOL carryforwards and tax credits that will be available to be carried forward to future tax periods following the merger. On November 25, 2008, HLTH repurchased 83,699,922 shares of its common stock in a tender offer. The tender offer resulted in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of HLTH’s stock, as determined under rules prescribed by the Code and applicable Treasury regulations. As a result of this ownership change, there will be an annual limitation on the amount of the NOL carryforwards and tax credits that HLTH and WebMD may use to offset income in each tax year following such ownership change. The merger may increase the possibility of another such annual limitation. Because substantially all of HLTH’s and WebMD’s NOL carryforwards have already been reduced by a valuation allowance for financial accounting purposes, we would not expect an annual limitation on the utilization of the NOL carryforwards to significantly reduce the net deferred tax asset, although the timing of cash flows may be impacted to the extent any such annual limitation deferred the utilization of NOL carryforwards to future tax years.
 
HLTH officers and directors have financial interests in the merger that differ from the interests of HLTH stockholders
 
HLTH’s executive officers and directors have financial interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of HLTH’s stockholders. The members of the HLTH Board of Directors were aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and the merger, and in recommending to HLTH stockholders that the merger agreement be adopted. For more information about these interests, please see “The Merger — Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger.”
 
The structure of the potential compensation payable to Raymond James, the financial advisor to HLTH, contains incentives for issuing the fairness opinion.
 
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated November 7, 2007 between HLTH and Raymond James, HLTH paid Raymond James a fee of $100,000 upon delivery of its fairness opinion to the HLTH Board of Directors in connection with the merger. The engagement letter also provides that Raymond James will be paid a $1,000,000 fee if the merger is completed. HLTH also previously paid a retainer fee of $50,000 and an opinion fee of $500,000 to Raymond James in connection with the terminated 2008 merger transaction between HLTH and WebMD. HLTH negotiated this fee structure so that it would not have to pay the additional $1,000,000 fee if the merger were not consummated. At the time HLTH’s Board of Directors requested delivery of a fairness opinion from Raymond James in connection with the merger, HLTH’s Board understood the potential incentives to issue a fairness opinion created by the applicable fee structure. However, HLTH’s Board believed that Raymond James would apply appropriate professional judgment in connection with its delivery of such opinion, regardless of the fee structure. Nonetheless, HLTH stockholders should, in reviewing Raymond James’ fairness opinion, be aware of the incentives to issuing the fairness opinion created by the fee structure negotiated by HLTH with Raymond James.
 
 
 


32


Table of Contents

Risks Related to WebMD and Ownership of its Securities
 
The following risks related to WebMD and ownership of its securities currently affect both holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock and, by virtue of HLTH’s ownership interest in WebMD, holders of HLTH Common Stock. After the merger, stockholders of the combined company will continue to be subject to these risks.
 
Risks Related to WebMD’s Operations and the Healthcare Content WebMD Provides
 

If WebMD is unable to provide content and services that attract and retain users to The WebMD Health Network on a consistent basis, its advertising and sponsorship revenue could be reduced
 
Users of The WebMD Health Network have numerous other online and offline sources of healthcare information services. WebMD’s ability to compete for user traffic on its public portals depends upon its ability to make available a variety of health and medical content, decision-support applications and other services that meet the needs of a variety of types of users, including consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, with a variety of reasons for seeking information. WebMD’s ability to do so depends, in turn, on:
 
  •  its ability to hire and retain qualified authors, journalists and independent writers;
 
  •  its ability to license quality content from third parties; and
 
  •  its ability to monitor and respond to increases and decreases in user interest in specific topics.
 
We cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to continue to develop or acquire needed content, applications and tools at a reasonable cost. In addition, since consumer users of WebMD’s public portals may be attracted to The WebMD Health Network as a result of a specific condition or for a specific purpose, it is difficult for us to predict the rate at which they will return to the public portals. Because WebMD generates revenue by, among other things, selling sponsorships of specific pages, sections or events on The WebMD Health Network, a decline in user traffic levels or a reduction in the number of pages viewed by users could cause WebMD’s revenue to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on WebMD’s results of operations.
 
Developing and implementing new and updated applications, features and services for WebMD’s public and private portals may be more difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue to justify the costs
 
Attracting and retaining users of WebMD’s public portals and clients for WebMD’s private portals requires WebMD to continue to improve the technology underlying those portals and to continue to develop new and updated applications, features and services for those portals. If WebMD is unable to do so on a timely basis or if it is unable to implement new applications, features and services without disruption to existing ones, WebMD may lose potential users and clients.
 
WebMD relies on a combination of internal development, strategic relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop its portals and related applications, features and services. Its development and/or implementation of new technologies, applications, features and services may cost more than expected, may take longer than originally expected, may require more testing than originally anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies, applications, features or services will justify the amounts spent.
 
WebMD faces significant competition for its healthcare information products and services
 
The markets for healthcare information products and services are intensely competitive, continually evolving and, in some cases, subject to rapid change.
 
  •  WebMD’s public portals face competition from numerous other companies, both in attracting users and in generating revenue from advertisers and sponsors. WebMD competes for users with online services


33


Table of Contents

  and Web sites that provide health-related information, including both commercial sites and not-for-profit sites. WebMD competes for advertisers and sponsors with: health-related Web sites; general purpose consumer Web sites that offer specialized health sub-channels; other high-traffic Web sites that include both healthcare-related and non-healthcare-related content and services; search engines that provide specialized health search; and advertising networks that aggregate traffic from multiple sites. WebMD’s public portals also face competition from offline publications and information services.
 
  •  WebMD’s private portals compete with: providers of healthcare decision-support tools and online health management applications, including personal health records; wellness and disease management vendors; and health information services and health management offerings of healthcare benefits companies and their affiliates.
 
Many of WebMD’s competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than WebMD does. These organizations may be better known than WebMD is and have more customers or users than WebMD does. We cannot provide assurance that WebMD will be able to compete successfully against these organizations or any alliances they have formed or may form. Since there are no substantial barriers to entry into the markets in which WebMD’s public portals participate, we expect that competitors will continue to enter these markets.
 
Failure to maintain and enhance the “WebMD” brand could have a material adverse effect on WebMD’s business
 
We believe that the “WebMD” brand identity that WebMD has developed has contributed to the success of its business and has helped it achieve recognition as a trusted source of health and wellness information. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing that brand is important to expanding the user base for WebMD’s public portals, to its relationships with sponsors and advertisers and to its ability to gain additional employer and healthcare payer clients for our private portals. WebMD has expended considerable resources on establishing and enhancing the “WebMD” brand and its other brands, and it has developed policies and procedures designed to preserve and enhance its brands, including editorial procedures designed to provide quality control of the information it publishes. WebMD expects to continue to devote resources and efforts to maintain and enhance its brands. However, WebMD may not be able to successfully maintain or enhance awareness of its brands, and events outside of its control may have a negative effect on its brands. If WebMD is unable to maintain or enhance awareness of its brands, and do so in a cost-effective manner, its business could be adversely affected.
 
WebMD’s online businesses have a limited operating history
 
WebMD’s online businesses have a limited operating history and participate in relatively new markets. These markets, and WebMD’s online businesses, have undergone significant changes during their short history and can be expected to continue to change. Many companies with business plans based on providing healthcare information and related services through the Internet have failed to be profitable and some have filed for bankruptcy and/or ceased operations. Even if demand from users exists, we cannot assure you that WebMD’s businesses will continue to be profitable.
 
WebMD’s failure to attract and retain qualified executives and employees may have a material adverse effect on its business
 
WebMD’s business depends largely on the skills, experience and performance of key members of its management team. WebMD also depends, in part, on its ability to attract and retain qualified writers and editors, software developers and other technical personnel and sales and marketing personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in the healthcare information services and Internet industries is intense. We cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel to meet its requirements, or that WebMD will be able to do so at salary and benefit costs that are acceptable to it. Failure to do so may have an adverse effect on WebMD’s business.


34


Table of Contents

The timing of WebMD’s advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and is subject to factors beyond its control, including regulatory changes affecting advertising and promotion of drugs and medical devices and general economic conditions
 
WebMD’s advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are not in its control, and some of which may be difficult to forecast accurately, including potential effects on demand for its services as a result of general economic conditions and regulatory changes affecting advertising and promotion of drugs and medical devices. The majority of WebMD’s advertising and sponsorship programs are for terms of approximately four to twelve months. WebMD has relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship programs. We cannot assure you that WebMD’s current advertisers and sponsors will continue to use its services beyond the terms of their existing contracts or that they will enter into any additional contracts.
 
The time between the date of initial contact with a potential advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and the execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for that program may be lengthy, especially for larger contracts, and may be subject to delays over which WebMD has little or no control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals. Other factors that could affect the timing of contracting for specific programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of revenue under such contracts, include:
 
  •  the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved uses for existing products;
 
  •  the timing of FDA approval of generic products that compete with existing brand name products;
 
  •  the timing of withdrawals of products from the market;
 
  •  the timing of rollouts of new or enhanced services on WebMD’s public portals;
 
  •  seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing of promotional campaigns for specific products; and
 
  •  the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other healthcare professionals.
 
WebMD may be unsuccessful in its efforts to increase advertising and sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies
 
Most of WebMD’s advertising and sponsorship revenue has, in the past, come from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies. WebMD has been focusing on increasing sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies that are interested in communicating health-related or safety-related information about their products to WebMD’s audience. However, while many consumer products companies are increasing the portion of their promotional spending used on the Internet, we cannot assure you that these advertisers and sponsors will find WebMD’s consumer Web sites to be as effective as other Web sites or traditional media for promoting their products and services. If WebMD encounters difficulties in competing with the other alternatives available to consumer products companies, this portion of its business may develop more slowly than we expect or may fail to develop. In addition, revenues from consumer products companies are more likely to reflect general economic conditions, and to be reduced to a greater extent during economic downturns or recessions, than revenues from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies.
 
Lengthy sales and implementation cycles for WebMD’s private online portals make it difficult to forecast WebMD’s revenues from these applications and may have an adverse impact on its business
 
The period from WebMD’s initial contact with a potential client for a private online portal and the first purchase of its solution by the client is difficult to predict. In the past, this period has generally ranged from six to twelve months, but in some cases has been longer. Potential sales may be subject to delays or cancellations due to a client’s internal procedures for approving large expenditures and other factors beyond WebMD’s control, including the effect of general economic conditions on the willingness of potential clients to commit to licensing WebMD’s private portals. The time it takes to implement a private online portal is also difficult to predict and has lasted as long as six months from contract execution to the commencement of live


35


Table of Contents

operation. Implementation may be subject to delays based on the availability of the internal resources of the client that are needed and other factors outside of WebMD’s control. As a result, WebMD has limited ability to forecast the timing of revenue from new clients. This, in turn, makes it more difficult to predict WebMD’s financial performance from quarter to quarter.
 
During the sales cycle and the implementation period, WebMD may expend substantial time, effort and money preparing contract proposals, negotiating contracts and implementing the private online portal without receiving any related revenue. In addition, many of the expenses related to providing private online portals are relatively fixed in the short term, including personnel costs and technology and infrastructure costs. Even if WebMD’s private portal revenue is lower than expected, WebMD may not be able to reduce related short-term spending in response. Any shortfall in such revenue would have a direct impact on WebMD’s results of operations.
 
WebMD’s ability to provide comparative information on hospital cost and quality depends on its ability to obtain the required data on a timely basis and, if WebMD is unable to do so, its private portal services would be less attractive to clients
 
WebMD provides, in connection with its private portal services, comparative information about hospital cost and quality. WebMD’s ability to provide this information depends on its ability to obtain comprehensive, reliable data. WebMD currently obtains this data from a number of public and private sources, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), many individual states and the Leapfrog Group. WebMD cannot provide assurance that it would be able to find alternative sources for this data on acceptable terms and conditions. Accordingly, WebMD’s business could be negatively impacted if CMS or WebMD’s other data sources cease to make such information available or impose terms and conditions for making it available that are not consistent with WebMD’s planned usage. In addition, the quality of the comparative information services that WebMD provides depends on the reliability of the information that WebMD is able to obtain. If the information WebMD uses to provide these services contains errors or is otherwise unreliable, WebMD could lose clients and its reputation could be damaged.
 
WebMD’s ability to renew existing agreements with employers and health plans will depend, in part, on its ability to continue to increase usage of its private portal services by their employees and plan members
 
In a healthcare market where a greater share of the responsibility for healthcare costs and decision-making has been increasingly shifting to consumers, use of information technology (including personal health records) to assist consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare has also increased. WebMD believes that, through its WebMD Health and Benefits Manager platform, including its personal health record application, it is well positioned to play a role in this consumer-directed healthcare environment, and that these services will be a significant driver for the growth of its private portals during the next several years. However, WebMD’s growth strategy depends, in part, on increasing usage of its private portal services by its employer and health plan clients’ employees and members, respectively. Increasing usage of WebMD’s services requires it to continue to deliver and improve the underlying technology and develop new and updated applications, features and services. In addition, WebMD faces competition in the area of healthcare decision-support tools and online health management applications and health information services. Many of WebMD’s competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than it does, and may be better known than it is. We cannot provide assurance that WebMD will be able to meet its development and implementation goals or that WebMD will be able to compete successfully against other vendors offering competitive services and, if WebMD is unable to do so, it may experience static or diminished usage for its private portal services and possible non-renewals of its customer agreements.
 
WebMD may be subject to claims brought against it as a result of content it provides
 
Consumers access health-related information through WebMD’s online services, including information regarding particular medical conditions and possible adverse reactions or side effects from medications. If WebMD’s content, or content that WebMD obtains from third parties, contains inaccuracies, it is possible that consumers, employees, health plan members or others may sue WebMD for various causes of action. Although


36


Table of Contents

WebMD’s Web sites contain terms and conditions, including disclaimers of liability, that are intended to reduce or eliminate its liability, the law governing the validity and enforceability of online agreements and other electronic transactions is evolving. WebMD could be subject to claims by third parties that its online agreements with consumers and physicians that provide the terms and conditions for use of WebMD’s public or private portals are unenforceable. A finding by a court that these agreements are invalid and that WebMD is subject to liability could harm its business and require costly changes to its business.
 
WebMD has editorial procedures in place to provide quality control of the information that it publishes or provides. However, we cannot assure you that WebMD’s editorial and other quality control procedures will be sufficient to ensure that there are no errors or omissions in particular content. Even if potential claims do not result in liability to WebMD, investigating and defending against these claims could be expensive and time consuming and could divert management’s attention away from WebMD’s operations. In addition, WebMD’s business is based on establishing the reputation of its portals as trustworthy and dependable sources of healthcare information. Allegations of impropriety or inaccuracy, even if unfounded, could harm WebMD’s reputation and business.
 
Expansion to markets outside the United States will subject WebMD to additional risks
 
One element of WebMD’s growth strategy is to seek to expand its online services to markets outside the United States. Generally, WebMD expects that it would accomplish this through partnerships or joint ventures with other companies having expertise in the specific country or region. However, WebMD’s participation in international markets will still be subject to certain risks beyond those applicable to its operations in the United States, such as:
 
  •  difficulties in staffing and managing operations outside of the United States;
 
  •  fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
 
  •  burdens of complying with a wide variety of legal, regulatory and market requirements;
 
  •  variability of economic and political conditions, including the extent of the impact of recent adverse economic conditions in markets outside the United States;
 
  •  tariffs or other trade barriers;
 
  •  costs of providing and marketing products and services in different markets;
 
  •  potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on repatriation of earnings; and
 
  •  difficulties in protecting intellectual property.
 
Risks Related to the Internet and WebMD’s Technological Infrastructure
 
Any service interruption or failure in the systems that we use to provide online services could harm our business
 
WebMD’s online services are designed to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, without interruption. However, WebMD has experienced and expects that it will, in the future, experience interruptions and delays in services and availability from time to time. WebMD relies on internal systems as well as third-party vendors, including data center providers and bandwidth providers, to provide its online services. WebMD may not maintain redundant systems or facilities for some of these services. In the event of a catastrophic event with respect to one or more of these systems or facilities, WebMD may experience an extended period of system unavailability, which could negatively impact its relationship with users. In addition, system failures may result in loss of data, including user registration data, content, and other data critical to the operation of WebMD’s online services, which could cause significant harm to its business and our reputation.


37


Table of Contents

To operate without interruption or loss of data, both WebMD and its service providers must guard against:
 
  •  damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters;
 
  •  communications failures;
 
  •  software and hardware errors, failures and crashes;
 
  •  security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive problems; and
 
  •  other potential service interruptions.
 
Any disruption in the network access or co-location services provided by third-party providers to WebMD or any failure by these third-party providers or WebMD’s own systems to handle current or higher volume of use could significantly harm WebMD’s business. WebMD exercises little control over these third-party vendors, which increases WebMD’s vulnerability to problems with services they provide.
 
Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in connection with these third-party technologies and information services or WebMD’s own systems could negatively impact WebMD’s relationships with users and adversely affect WebMD’s brand and its business and could expose it to liabilities to third parties. Although WebMD maintains insurance for its business, the coverage under its policies may not be adequate to compensate it for all losses that may occur. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that WebMD will continue to be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
 
Implementation of additions to or changes in hardware and software platforms used to deliver WebMD’s online services may result in performance problems and may not provide the additional functionality that was expected
 
From time to time, WebMD implements additions to or changes in the hardware and software platforms it uses for providing its online services. During and after the implementation of additions or changes, a platform may not perform as expected, which could result in interruptions in operations, an increase in response time or an inability to track performance metrics. In addition, in connection with integrating acquired businesses, WebMD may move their operations to WebMD’s hardware and software platforms or make other changes, any of which could result in interruptions in those operations. Any significant interruption in WebMD’s ability to operate any of its online services could have an adverse effect on its relationships with users and clients and, as a result, on its financial results. WebMD relies on a combination of purchasing, licensing, internal development, and acquisitions to develop its hardware and software platforms. WebMD’s implementation of additions to or changes in these platforms may cost more than originally expected, may take longer than originally expected, and may require more testing than originally anticipated. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that additions to or changes in these platforms will provide the additional functionality and other benefits that were originally expected.
 
If the systems WebMD uses to provide online portals experience security breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, its business could suffer
 
WebMD retains and transmits confidential information, including personal health records, in the processing centers and other facilities that it uses to provide online services. It is critical that these facilities and infrastructure remain secure and be perceived by the marketplace as secure. A security breach could damage WebMD’s reputation or result in liability. WebMD may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate problems caused by breaches. Despite the implementation of security measures, this infrastructure or other systems that WebMD interfaces with, including the Internet and related systems, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee or contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors, denial-of-service attacks or other attacks by third parties or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of WebMD’s security, whether as a result of its own systems or the systems that they interface with, could reduce demand for WebMD’s services


38


Table of Contents

and could subject it to legal claims from its clients and users, including for breach of contract or breach of warranty.
 
WebMD’s online services are dependent on the development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure
 
WebMD’s ability to deliver its online services is dependent on the development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the Internet by third parties. The Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and delays in the future. The Internet has also experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the number of users and the amount of traffic. If the Internet continues to experience increased usage, the Internet infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on it. In addition, the reliability and performance of the Internet may be harmed by increased usage or by denial-of-service attacks. Any resulting interruptions in WebMD’s services or increases in response time could, if significant, result in a loss of potential or existing users of and advertisers and sponsors on WebMD’s Web sites and, if sustained or repeated, could reduce the attractiveness of WebMD’s services.
 
Customers who utilize WebMD’s online services depend on Internet service providers and other Web site operators for access to WebMD’s Web sites. All of these providers have experienced significant outages in the past and could experience outages, delays and other difficulties in the future due to system failures unrelated to WebMD’s systems. Any such outages or other failures on their part could reduce traffic to WebMD’s Web sites.
 
Third parties may challenge the enforceability of WebMD’s online agreements
 
The law governing the validity and enforceability of online agreements and other electronic transactions is evolving. WebMD could be subject to claims by third parties that the online terms and conditions for use of WebMD’s Web sites, including disclaimers or limitations of liability, are unenforceable. A finding by a court that these terms and conditions or other online agreements are invalid could harm WebMD’s business.
 
WebMD could be subject to breach of warranty or other claims by clients of its online portals if the software and systems WebMD uses to provide these services contain errors or experience failures
 
Errors in the software and systems WebMD uses could cause serious problems for clients of WebMD’s online portals. WebMD may fail to meet contractual performance standards or client expectations. Clients of WebMD’s online portals may seek compensation from WebMD or may seek to terminate their agreements with WebMD, withhold payments due to WebMD, seek refunds from us of part or all of the fees charged under those agreements or initiate litigation or other dispute resolution procedures. In addition, WebMD could face breach of warranty or other claims by clients or additional development costs. WebMD’s software and systems are inherently complex and, despite testing and quality control, we cannot be certain that they will perform as planned.
 
WebMD attempts to limit, by contract, its liability to its clients for damages arising from its negligence, errors or mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not provide sufficient protection to WebMD from liability for damages. WebMD maintains liability insurance coverage, including coverage for errors and omissions. However, it is possible that claims could exceed the amount of WebMD’s applicable insurance coverage, if any, or that this coverage may not continue to be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts. Even if these claims do not result in liability to WebMD, investigating and defending against them would be expensive and time consuming and could divert management’s attention away from WebMD’s operations. In addition, negative publicity caused by these events may delay or hinder market acceptance of WebMD’s services, including unrelated services.


39


Table of Contents

Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry, Healthcare Regulation and Internet Regulation
 
Developments in the healthcare industry could adversely affect WebMD’s business
 
Most of WebMD’s revenue is derived from the healthcare industry and could be affected by changes affecting healthcare spending. WebMD is particularly dependent on pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies for its advertising and sponsorship revenue. General reductions in expenditures by healthcare industry participants could result from, among other things:
 
  •  government regulation or private initiatives that affect the manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients, payers or other healthcare industry participants, including changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products and services;
 
  •  consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
 
  •  reductions in governmental funding for healthcare; and
 
  •  adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting healthcare payers or providers, pharmaceutical, biotechnology or medical device companies or other healthcare industry participants.
 
Federal and state legislatures and agencies periodically consider reforming aspects of the United States healthcare system and Congress is currently considering significant healthcare reform legislation. Healthcare reform legislation, if enacted, may increase governmental involvement in healthcare and health insurance, may change the way health insurance is funded (including the role that employers play in such funding), may change reimbursement rates and other terms of such insurance coverage, may affect the way information technology is used in healthcare, and may otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate and the specific roles such participants play in the industry. Healthcare industry participants may respond to healthcare reform legislation or proposed legislation by reducing their expenditures or postponing expenditure decisions, including expenditures for WebMD’s services. We are unable to predict future legislation or proposals with any certainty or to predict the effect they could have on WebMD.
 
Even if general expenditures by industry participants remain the same or increase, developments in the healthcare industry may result in reduced spending in some or all of the specific market segments that WebMD serves or is planning to serve. For example, use of WebMD’s products and services could be affected by:
 
  •  changes in the design of health insurance plans;
 
  •  a decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming to market; and
 
  •  decreases in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical or medical device companies, including as a result of governmental regulation or private initiatives that discourage or prohibit advertising or sponsorship activities by pharmaceutical or medical device companies.
 
In addition, the expectations of WebMD’s customers regarding pending or potential industry developments may also affect their budgeting processes and spending plans with respect to products and services of the types that WebMD provides.
 
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent years and we expect that significant changes will continue to occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot assure you that the markets for WebMD’s products and services will continue to exist at current levels or that WebMD will have adequate technical, financial and marketing resources to react to changes in those markets.
 
Government regulation of healthcare creates risks and challenges with respect to WebMD’s compliance efforts and its business strategies
 
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, legislative, regulatory and other influences. Existing and new laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry could create


40


Table of Contents

unexpected liabilities for WebMD, could cause it to incur additional costs and could restrict its operations. Many healthcare laws are complex, and their application to specific products and services may not be clear. In particular, many existing healthcare laws and regulations, when enacted, did not anticipate the healthcare information services that WebMD provides. However, these laws and regulations may nonetheless be applied to WebMD’s products and services. WebMD’s failure to accurately anticipate the application of these laws and regulations, or other failure to comply, could create liability for WebMD, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect its businesses. Some of the risks that WebMD faces from healthcare regulation are as follows:
 
  •  Regulation of Drug and Medical Device Advertising and Promotion.  The WebMD Health Network provides services involving advertising and promotion of prescription and over-the-counter drugs and medical devices. If the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finds that any information on The WebMD Health Network or in WebMD the Magazine violates FDA or FTC regulations, they may take regulatory or judicial action against WebMD and/or the advertiser or sponsor of that information. State attorneys general may also take similar action based on their state’s consumer protection statutes. Any increase or change in regulation of drug or medical device advertising and promotion could make it more difficult for WebMD to contract for sponsorships and advertising. Members of Congress, physician groups and others have criticized the FDA’s current policies, and have called for restrictions on advertising of prescription drugs to consumers and increased FDA enforcement. We cannot predict what actions the FDA or industry participants may take in response to these criticisms. It is also possible that new laws would be enacted that impose restrictions on such advertising. In addition, recent private industry initiatives have resulted in voluntary restrictions, which advertisers and sponsors have agreed to follow. WebMD’s advertising and sponsorship revenue could be materially reduced by additional restrictions on the advertising of prescription drugs and medical devices to consumers, whether imposed by law or regulation or required under policies adopted by industry members.
 
  •  Anti-kickback Laws.  There are federal and state laws that govern patient referrals, physician financial relationships and inducements to healthcare providers and patients. The federal healthcare programs’ anti-kickback law prohibits any person or entity from offering, paying, soliciting or receiving anything of value, directly or indirectly, for the referral of patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs or the leasing, purchasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the lease, purchase or order of any item, good, facility or service covered by these programs. Many states also have similar anti-kickback laws that are not necessarily limited to items or services for which payment is made by a federal healthcare program. These laws are applicable to manufacturers and distributors and, therefore, may restrict how WebMD and some of its customers market products to healthcare providers, including e-details. Any determination by a state or federal regulatory agency that any of WebMD’s practices violate any of these laws could subject it to civil or criminal penalties and require it to change or terminate some portions of its business and could have an adverse effect on its business. Even an unsuccessful challenge by regulatory authorities of WebMD’s practices could result in adverse publicity and be costly for it to respond to.
 
  •  Medical Professional Regulation.  The practice of most healthcare professions requires licensing under applicable state law. In addition, the laws in some states prohibit business entities from practicing medicine. If a state determines that some portion of WebMD’s business violates these laws, it may seek to have it discontinue those portions or subject it to penalties or licensure requirements. Any determination that WebMD is a healthcare provider and has acted improperly as a healthcare provider may result in liability to WebMD.
 
Government regulation of the Internet could adversely affect WebMD’s business
 
The Internet and its associated technologies are subject to government regulation. However, whether and how existing laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, including privacy and consumer protection laws, apply to the Internet is still uncertain. WebMD’s failure, or the failure of its business partners or third-party service providers, to accurately anticipate the application of these laws and regulations to WebMD’s products


41


Table of Contents

and services and the manner in which WebMD delivers them, or any other failure to comply with such laws and regulations, could create liability for WebMD, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect its business. In addition, new laws and regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, may be adopted with respect to the Internet and online services, including in areas such as: user privacy, confidentiality, consumer protection, pricing, content, copyrights and patents, and characteristics and quality of products and services. We cannot predict how these laws or regulations will affect WebMD’s business.
 
Internet user privacy and the use of consumer information to track online activities are major issues both in the United States and abroad. For example, in February 2009, the FTC published Self Regulatory Principles to govern the tracking of consumers’ activities online in order to deliver advertising targeted to the interests of individual consumers (sometimes referred to as behavioral advertising). These principles serve as guidelines to industry. In addition, there is the possibility of proposed legislation and enforcement activities relating to behavioral advertising. WebMD has privacy policies posted on its Web sites that we believe comply with applicable laws requiring notice to users about WebMD’s information collection, use and disclosure practices. WebMD also notifies users about its information collection, use and disclosure practices relating to data that it receive through offline means such as paper health risk assessments. We cannot assure you that the privacy policies and other statements that WebMD provides to users of its products and services, or its practices will be found sufficient to protect it from liability or adverse publicity in this area. A determination by a state or federal agency or court that any of WebMD’s practices do not meet applicable standards, or the implementation of new standards or requirements, could adversely affect its business.
 
WebMD faces potential liability related to the privacy and security of personal health information it collects from or on behalf of users of its services
 
Privacy and security of personal health information, particularly personal health information stored or transmitted electronically, is a major issue in the United States. The Privacy Standards and Security Standards under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (or HIPAA) establish a set of national privacy and security standards for the protection of individually identifiable health information by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers (referred to as covered entities) and their business associates. Currently, only covered entities are directly subject to potential civil and criminal liability under these Standards. However, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (which we refer to as ARRA) amends the HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards and makes certain provisions applicable to those portions of WebMD’s business (such as those managing employee or plan member health information for employers or health plans) that are business associates of covered entities. Currently, WebMD is bound by certain contracts and agreements to use and disclose protected health information in a manner consistent with the Privacy Standards and Security Standards. Beginning on February 17, 2010, some provisions of the HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards will apply directly to WebMD. Currently, depending on the facts and circumstances, WebMD could potentially be subject to criminal liability for aiding and abetting or conspiring with a covered entity to violate the Privacy Standards or Security Standards. As of February 17, 2010, WebMD will be directly subject to HIPAA’s criminal and civil penalties. We cannot assure you that WebMD will adequately address the risks created by these Standards.
 
We are unable to predict what changes to these Standards might be made in the future or how those changes, or other changes in applicable laws and regulations, could affect WebMD’s business. Any new legislation or regulation in the area of privacy of personal information, including personal health information, could affect the way WebMD operates its business and could harm its business.
 
Failure to maintain CME accreditation could adversely affect Medscape, LLC’s ability to provide online CME offerings
 
Medscape, LLC’s continuing medical education (or CME) activities are planned and implemented in accordance with the current Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, or ACCME, which oversees providers of CME credit, and other applicable accreditation standards. ACCME’s standards for commercial support of CME are intended to ensure, among other things, that CME activities of ACCME-accredited providers, such as Medscape, LLC, are independent of “commercial interests,”


42


Table of Contents

which are defined as entities that produce, market, re-sell or distribute healthcare goods and services, excluding certain organizations. “Commercial interests,” and entities owned or controlled by “commercial interests,” are ineligible for accreditation by the ACCME. The standards also provide that accredited CME providers may not place their CME content on Web sites owned or controlled by a “commercial interest.” In addition, accredited CME providers may not ask “commercial interests” for speaker or topic suggestions, and are also prohibited from asking “commercial interests” to review CME content prior to delivery.
 
From time to time, ACCME revises its standards for commercial support of CME. As a result of certain past ACCME revisions, WebMD adjusted its corporate structure and made changes to its management and operations intended to allow Medscape, LLC to provide CME activities that are developed independently from programs developed by its sister companies, which may not be independent of “commercial interests.” We believe that these changes allow Medscape, LLC to satisfy the applicable standards.
 
In June 2008, the ACCME published for comment several proposals, including the following:
 
  •  The ACCME stated that due consideration should be given to eliminating commercial support of CME.
 
  •  The ACCME proposed that: (a) accredited providers must not receive communications from commercial interests announcing or prescribing any specific content that would be a preferred, or sought-after, topic for commercially supported CME (e.g., therapeutic area, product-line, patho-physiology); and (b) receiving communications from commercial interests regarding a commercial interest’s internal criteria for providing commercial support would also not be permissible.
 
The comment period for these proposals ended on September 12, 2008, and the ACCME has determined not to take any action as to these proposals at this point. However, in April 2009, the ACCME published for comment several other proposals, including the following:
 
  •  “Commercial Support-Free” Designation.  In order to clarify the distinction between CME that does include relationships with industry from CME that does not include relationships with industry, the ACCME is considering creating a new designation and review process for CME providers that wish to identify their program of CME as one that does not utilize funds donated by commercial interests. The designation would be termed: “Commercial Support-Free.” The ACCME has indicated that a range of standards for “Commercial Support-Free” CME are possible, including for example: (1) the CME provider not accepting any commercial support for any CME activity, or any part of its CME program; and (2) the CME provider not using funds from advertising or promotion, paid by commercial interests, to underwrite the costs of CME.
 
  •  Independent CME Funding Entity.  The ACCME is considering creating a granting entity that would accept unrestricted donations for the purpose of funding CME. The funds would be distributed to ACCME recognized and accredited organizations for development and presentation of ACCME-compliant CME. The ACCME is proposing for comment that the entity would: (1) be independent of the ACCME; (2) not provide funds to the ACCME; (3) be managed by its own governance structure; (4) establish its own granting criteria reflecting practice gaps established through methods consistent with ACCME’s content validation policies; and (5) fund CME done for U.S. learners.
 
The comment period for these proposals ended on May 21, 2009. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the process, including what other alternatives may be considered by ACCME as a result of comments it has received. The elimination of, or restrictions on, commercial support for CME could adversely affect the volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through WebMD’s Web sites.
 
Medscape, LLC’s current ACCME accreditation expires at the end of July 2010. In order for Medscape, LLC to renew its accreditation, it will be required to demonstrate to the ACCME that it continues to meet ACCME requirements. If Medscape, LLC fails to maintain its status as an accredited ACCME provider (whether at the time of such renewal or at an earlier time as a result of a failure to comply with existing or additional ACCME standards), it would not be permitted to accredit CME activities for physicians and other healthcare professionals. Instead, Medscape, LLC would be required to use third parties to provide such CME-


43


Table of Contents

related services. That, in turn, could discourage potential supporters from engaging Medscape, LLC to develop CME or education-related activities, which could have a material adverse effect on WebMD’s business.
 
Government regulation and industry initiatives could adversely affect the volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through Medscape, LLC’s Web sites or require changes to how it offers CME
 
CME activities may be subject to government oversight or regulation by Congress, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services (the federal agency responsible for interpreting certain federal laws relating to healthcare), and by state regulatory agencies. Medscape, LLC and/or the sponsors of the CME activities that Medscape, LLC accredits may be subject to enforcement actions if any of these CME activities are deemed improperly promotional, potentially leading to the termination of sponsorships.
 
During the past several years, educational activities, including CME, directed at physicians have been subject to increased governmental scrutiny to ensure that sponsors do not influence or control the content of the activities. For example, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee conducted an investigation of the sponsorship of CME activities, including an examination of the ACCME’s role in ensuring that CME activities are independent from the influence of their supporters. In response, pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies have developed and implemented internal controls and procedures that promote adherence to applicable regulations and requirements. In implementing these controls and procedures, supporters of CME may interpret the regulations and requirements differently and may implement varying procedures or requirements. These controls and procedures:
 
  •  may discourage pharmaceutical companies from providing grants for independent educational activities;
 
  •  may slow their internal approval for such grants;
 
  •  may reduce the volume of sponsored educational programs that Medscape, LLC produces to levels that are lower than in the past, thereby reducing revenue; and
 
  •  may require Medscape, LLC to make changes to how it offers or provides educational programs, including CME.
 
In addition, future changes to laws, regulations or accreditation standards, or to the internal compliance programs of supporters or potential supporters, may further discourage, significantly limit, or prohibit supporters or potential supporters from engaging in educational activities with Medscape, LLC, or may require Medscape, LLC to make further changes in the way it offers or provides educational activities.
 
Other Risks Applicable to WebMD and Ownership of its Securities
 
Negative conditions in the market for certain ARS may result in WebMD incurring a loss on such investments
 
As of June 30, 2009, WebMD had a total of approximately $163.9 million (face value) of investments in certain ARS. Those ARS had a book value of $126.3 million as of June 30, 2009. The types of ARS investments that WebMD owns are backed by student loans, 97% of which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. WebMD does not own any other type of ARS investments.
 
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In the event WebMD needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments, it may not be able to do so until a future auction on these types of investments is successful or until a buyer is found outside the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling to purchase the investments at their carrying amount, WebMD would incur a loss on any such sales. In addition, the credit ratings on some of the ARS investments in our portfolio have been downgraded, and there may be additional such rating downgrades in the future. If uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or ARS investments in our portfolio experience additional credit


44


Table of Contents

rating downgrades, there could be further fair value adjustments or other-than-temporary impairments in the carrying value of our ARS investments.
 
WebMD may not be successful in protecting its intellectual property and proprietary rights
 
WebMD’s intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to its businesses. The steps that WebMD takes to protect its intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets may prove to be inadequate and, whether or not adequate, may be expensive. WebMD relies on a combination of trade secret, patent and other intellectual property laws and confidentiality procedures and non-disclosure contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property. We cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to detect potential or actual misappropriation or infringement of its intellectual property, proprietary information or trade secrets. Even if WebMD detects misappropriation or infringement by a third party, we cannot assure you that it will be able to enforce its rights at a reasonable cost, or at all. In addition, WebMD’s rights to intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets may not prevent independent third-party development and commercialization of competing products or services.
 
Third parties may claim that WebMD is infringing their intellectual property, and it could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from providing certain services, which may harm its business
 
WebMD could be subject to claims that it is misappropriating or infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and divert management’s attention from WebMD’s operations. If WebMD becomes liable to third parties for infringing these rights, it could be required to pay a substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or services that use or contain the infringing intellectual property. WebMD may be unable to develop non-infringing products or services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. WebMD may also be required to indemnify its customers if they become subject to third-party claims relating to intellectual property that WebMD licenses or otherwise provides to them, which could be costly.
 
Acquisitions, business combinations and other transactions may be difficult to complete and, if completed, may have negative consequences for WebMD’s business and its security holders
 
WebMD has been built, in part, through acquisitions. WebMD intends to continue to seek to acquire or to engage in business combinations with companies engaged in complementary businesses. In addition, WebMD may enter into joint ventures, strategic alliances or similar arrangements with third parties. These transactions may result in changes in the nature and scope of WebMD’s operations and changes in its financial condition. WebMD’s success in completing these types of transactions will depend on, among other things, its ability to locate suitable candidates and negotiate mutually acceptable terms with them, and to obtain adequate financing. Significant competition for these opportunities exists, which may increase the cost of and decrease the opportunities for these types of transactions. Financing for these transactions may come from several sources, including:
 
  •  cash and cash equivalents on hand and marketable securities;
 
  •  proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness; and
 
  •  proceeds from the issuance of additional common stock, of preferred stock, of convertible debt or of other securities.
 
The issuance of additional equity or debt securities could:
 
  •  cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of WebMD’s stockholders at the time of the issuance;
 
  •  cause substantial dilution of WebMD’s earnings per share;
 
  •  subject WebMD to the risks associated with increased leverage, including a reduction in WebMD’s ability to obtain financing or an increase in the cost of any financing that it obtains;


45


Table of Contents

 
  •  subject WebMD to restrictive covenants that could limit its flexibility in conducting future business activities; and
 
  •  adversely affect the prevailing market price for WebMD’s outstanding securities.
 
WebMD does not intend to seek security holder approval for any such acquisition or security issuance unless required by applicable law, regulation or the terms of then existing securities.
 
WebMD’s business will suffer if it fails to successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies or to assess the risks in particular transactions
 
WebMD has in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire, businesses, technologies, services, product lines and other assets. The successful integration of the acquired businesses and assets into WebMD’s operations, on a cost-effective basis, can be critical to its future performance. The amount and timing of the expected benefits of any acquisition, including potential synergies between WebMD and the acquired business, are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to:
 
  •  WebMD’s ability to maintain relationships with the customers of the acquired business;
 
  •  WebMD’s ability to retain or replace key personnel;
 
  •  potential conflicts in sponsor or advertising relationships or in relationships with strategic partners;
 
  •  WebMD’s ability to coordinate organizations that are geographically diverse and may have different business cultures; and
 
  •  compliance with regulatory requirements.
 
We cannot guarantee that any acquired businesses will be successfully integrated with WebMD’s operations in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all. Failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses or to achieve anticipated operating synergies, revenue enhancements or cost savings could have a material adverse effect on WebMD’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Although WebMD’s management attempts to evaluate the risks inherent in each transaction and to value acquisition candidates appropriately, we cannot assure you that WebMD will properly ascertain all such risks or that acquired businesses and assets will perform as WebMD expects or enhance the value of WebMD as a whole. In addition, acquired companies or businesses may have larger than expected liabilities that are not covered by the indemnification, if any, that WebMD is able to obtain from the sellers.
 
WebMD may not be able to raise additional funds when needed for its business or to exploit opportunities
 
WebMD’s future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the success of its service offerings, market developments, and repurchases of its common stock. WebMD may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities. If required, WebMD may raise such additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that such financing will not be dilutive to WebMD’s stockholders.
 
As widely reported, financial markets have been experiencing extreme disruption recently, including volatility in the prices of securities and severely diminished liquidity and availability of credit. Until this disruption in the financial markets is resolved, financing will be even more difficult to obtain on acceptable terms and WebMD could be forced to cancel or delay investments or transactions that it would otherwise have made.
 


46


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Porex
 
Risks related to Porex currently affect only holders of HLTH Common Stock. If Porex is not sold prior to the closing of the merger, the following risks would, following the closing, apply to all holders of WebMD Common Stock (including both those who held WebMD Class A Common Stock prior to the merger and those who held HLTH Common Stock prior to the merger).
 
The decision to sell Porex may have a negative impact on its business
 
As a result of HLTH’s announcement that it plans to divest Porex, the financial results and operations of Porex’s business may be adversely affected by the diversion of management resources to the sale process and by uncertainty regarding the outcome of the process. For example, the uncertainty of who will own the business in the future could lead Porex to lose or fail to attract employees, customers or business partners. Although HLTH has taken steps to address these risks, there can be no assurance that any such losses or distractions will not adversely affect the operations or financial results of Porex’s business.
 
Porex’s success depends upon demand for its products, which in some cases ultimately depends upon end-user demand for the products of Porex’s customers
 
Demand for Porex’s products may change materially as a result of economic or market conditions and other trends that affect the industries in which Porex participates. In addition, because a significant portion of Porex’s products are components that are eventually integrated into or used with products manufactured by customers for resale to end-users, the demand for these product components is dependent on product development cycles and marketing efforts of these other manufacturers, as well as variations in their inventory levels, which are factors that Porex is unable to control. Accordingly, the amount of Porex’s sales to manufacturer customers can be difficult to predict and subject to wide quarter-to-quarter variances. Porex’s sales to manufacturer customers that sell products used by consumers have been adversely affected by economic conditions during recent months. We cannot predict how long that adverse effect will continue and it could, depending on future economic conditions, become worse in future periods.
 
Porex faces significant competition for its products
 
Porex operates in highly competitive markets. The competitors for Porex’s porous plastic products include other producers of porous plastic materials, as well as companies that manufacture and sell products made from materials other than porous plastics that can be used for the same purposes as Porex’s products. For example, Porex’s porous plastic pen nibs compete with felt and fiber tips manufactured by a variety of suppliers worldwide. Other Porex porous plastic products compete, depending on the application, with membrane material, porous metals, metal screens, fiberglass tubes, pleated paper, resin-impregnated felt, ceramics and other substances and devices. Porex also competes with in-house design and manufacturing capabilities of its OEM customers. Some of Porex’s competitors may have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than Porex does. We cannot provide assurance that Porex will be able to compete successfully against these companies or against particular products they provide or may provide in the future.
 
Porex’s product offerings must meet changing customer requirements
 
Porex’s products are, in general, used in applications that are affected by technological change. To satisfy its customers, Porex must develop and introduce, in a timely manner, products that meet changing customer requirements at competitive prices. To do this, Porex must:
 
  •  develop new uses of existing porous plastics technologies and applications;
 
  •  innovate and develop new porous plastics technologies and applications;
 
  •  commercialize those technologies and applications;
 
  •  manufacture at a cost that allows it to price its products competitively;


47


Table of Contents

 
  •  manufacture and deliver its products in sufficient volumes and on time;
 
  •  accurately anticipate customer needs; and
 
  •  differentiate its offerings from those of its competitors.
 
We cannot assure you that Porex will be able to develop new or enhanced products or that, if it does, those products will achieve market acceptance. If Porex does not introduce new products in a timely manner and make enhancements to existing products to meet the changing needs of its customers, some of its products could become obsolete over time, in which case Porex’s customer relationships, revenue and operating results would be negatively impacted.
 
Potential new or enhanced Porex products may not achieve sufficient sales to be profitable or justify the cost of their development
 
Porex cannot be certain, when it engages in research and development activities, whether potential new products or product enhancements will be accepted by the customers for whom they are intended. Achieving market acceptance for new or enhanced products may require substantial marketing efforts and expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand by potential customers. In addition, sales and marketing efforts with respect to these products may require the use of additional resources for training the existing Porex sales forces and for hiring and training additional salespersons. There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from new or enhanced products will justify amounts spent for their development and marketing. In addition, there can be no assurance that any pricing strategy that Porex implements for any new or enhanced products will be economically viable or acceptable to the target markets.
 
Porex may not be able to source the raw materials it needs or may have to pay more for those raw materials
 
Some of Porex’s products require high-grade plastic resins with specific properties as raw materials. While Porex has not experienced any material difficulty in obtaining adequate supplies of high-grade plastic resins that meet its requirements, it relies on a limited number of sources for some of these plastic resins. If Porex experiences a reduction or interruption in supply from these sources, it may not be able to access alternative sources of supply within a reasonable period of time or at commercially reasonable rates, which could have a material adverse effect on its business and financial results.
 
In addition, the prices of some of the raw materials that Porex uses depend, to a great extent, on the price of petroleum. As a result, increases in the price of petroleum could have an adverse effect on Porex’s margins and on the ability of Porex’s porous plastics products to compete with products made from other raw materials.
 
Disruptions in Porex’s manufacturing operations could have a material adverse effect on its business and financial results
 
Any significant disruption in Porex’s manufacturing operations, including as a result of fire, power interruptions, equipment malfunctions, labor disputes, material shortages, earthquakes, floods, computer viruses, sabotage, terrorist acts or other force majeure, could have a material adverse effect on Porex’s ability to deliver products to customers and, accordingly, its financial results.
 
Porex may not be able to keep third parties from using technology it has developed
 
Porex uses proprietary technology for manufacturing its porous plastics products and its success is dependent, to a significant extent, on its ability to protect the proprietary and confidential aspects of its technology. Although Porex owns certain patents, it relies primarily on non-patented proprietary manufacturing processes. To protect its proprietary processes, Porex relies on a combination of trade secret laws, license agreements, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions and technical measures, including designing and manufacturing its porous molding equipment and most of its molds in-house. Trade secret laws do not afford the statutory exclusivity possible for patented processes. There can be no assurance that the legal protections


48


Table of Contents

afforded to Porex or the steps taken by Porex will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of its technology. In addition, these protections do not prevent independent third-party development of competitive products or services.
 
Third parties may claim that Porex is infringing their intellectual property, and it could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from providing certain services, which may harm its business
 
Porex could be subject to claims that it is misappropriating or infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and divert management’s attention from Porex’s operations. If Porex becomes liable to third parties for infringing these rights, it could be required to pay a substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or services that use or contain the infringing intellectual property. Porex may be unable to develop non-infringing products or services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
 
The nature of Porex’s products exposes it to product liability claims that may not be adequately covered by indemnity agreements or insurance
 
The products sold by Porex, whether sold directly to end-users or sold to other manufacturers for inclusion in the products that they sell, expose it to potential risk of product liability claims, particularly with respect to Porex’s life sciences, clinical, surgical and medical products. In addition, Porex is subject to the risk that a government authority or third party may require it to recall one or more of its products. Some of Porex’s products are designed to be permanently implanted in the human body. Design defects and manufacturing defects with respect to such products sold by Porex or failures that occur with the products of Porex’s manufacturer customers that contain components made by Porex could result in product liability claims and/or a recall of one or more of Porex’s products. Porex believes that it carries adequate insurance coverage against product liability claims and other risks. We cannot assure you, however, that claims in excess of Porex’s insurance coverage will not arise. In addition, Porex’s insurance policies must be renewed annually. Although Porex has been able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost in the past, we cannot assure you that Porex will continue to be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
 
In most instances, Porex has indemnity arrangements with its manufacturing customers. These indemnity arrangements generally provide that these customers would indemnify Porex from liabilities that may arise from the sale of their products that incorporate Porex components to, or the use of such products by, end-users. While Porex generally seeks contractual indemnification from its customers, any such indemnification is limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party. If Porex does not have adequate contractual indemnification available, product liability claims, to the extent not covered by insurance, could have a material adverse effect on its business and its financial results.
 
Porex’s manufacturing and marketing of medical devices is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and its failure to meet regulatory requirements could require it to pay fines, incur other costs or close facilities
 
Porex’s Surgical Products Group manufactures and markets medical devices, such as reconstructive and aesthetic surgical implants used in craniofacial applications and post-surgical drains. In addition, Porex manufactures and markets blood serum filters as a medical device for use in laboratory applications. These products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA under the FDC Act. The FDA’s regulations govern, among other things, product development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, premarket clearance (referred to as 510(k) clearance), premarket approval (referred to as PMA approval), advertising and promotion, and sales and distribution. In addition, the Porex facilities and manufacturing techniques used for manufacturing medical devices generally must conform to standards that are established by the FDA and other government agencies, including those of European and other foreign governments. These regulatory agencies may conduct periodic audits or inspections of such facilities or processes to monitor Porex’s compliance with


49


Table of Contents

applicable regulatory standards. If the FDA finds that Porex has failed to comply with applicable regulations, the agency can institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, including: warning letters or untitled letters; fines and civil penalties; unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions; delays in clearing or approving, or refusal to clear or approve, products; withdrawal or suspension of approval of products; product recall or seizure; orders for physician notification or device repair, replacement or refund; interruption of production; operating restrictions; injunctions; and criminal prosecution. Any adverse action by an applicable regulatory agency could impair Porex’s ability to produce its medical device products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet customer demands. Porex may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on its future sales of such products and its ability to generate profits.
 
Some of the companies to which Porex supplies its products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and their failure to meet regulatory requirements could adversely affect Porex’s business
 
Some of Porex’s customers are medical device manufacturers that use Porex products to make finished medical devices of their own. Those customers are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and/or equivalent foreign regulatory authorities. Those regulatory agencies may conduct periodic audits or inspections of their facilities to monitor their compliance with applicable regulatory standards. If the FDA finds that a Porex customer’s facility has failed to comply with applicable regulations, the agency can institute, against such customer, any of the enforcement actions identified in the risk factor directly above regarding regulation of Porex. Any adverse action by an applicable regulatory agency could impair the customers’ ability to produce products and thus could decrease demand for Porex’s products or require Porex to bear additional costs.
 
In addition, modifications to Porex’s customers’ products may require new regulatory approvals or clearances, including 510(k) clearances or premarket approvals, or require them to recall or cease marketing the modified devices until these clearances or approvals are obtained. The FDA may not approve or clear these product modifications for the indications that are necessary or desirable for successful commercialization. Indeed, the FDA may refuse Porex’s customers’ requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products, new intended uses or modifications to existing products. Failure of such customers to receive clearance or approval for new or modified products could reduce or delay their purchases of Porex’s products.
 
Economic, political and other risks associated with Porex’s international sales and geographically diverse operations could adversely affect Porex’s operations and financial results
 
Since Porex sells its products worldwide, its business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. In addition, Porex has manufacturing facilities in the United Kingdom, Germany and Malaysia. Accordingly, Porex’s operations and financial results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:
 
  •  changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
 
  •  changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets;
 
  •  trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
 
  •  changes in tax laws;
 
  •  differing protection of intellectual property rights in different countries; and
 
  •  changes in regulatory requirements.
 
Environmental regulation could adversely affect Porex’s business
 
Porex is subject to foreign and domestic environmental laws and regulations and is subject to scheduled and random checks by environmental authorities. Porex’s business involves the handling, storage and disposal of materials that are classified as hazardous. Although Porex’s safety procedures for handling, storage and disposal of these materials are designed to comply with the standards prescribed by applicable laws and regulations, Porex


50


Table of Contents

may be held liable for any environmental damages that result from Porex’s operations. Porex may be required to pay fines, remediation costs and damages, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.
 
 
 
 
Other Risks Related to HLTH
 
The following risks related to HLTH currently affect only holders of HLTH Common Stock. These risks would, following the closing of the merger, apply to all holders of WebMD Common Stock (including both those who held WebMD Class A Common Stock prior to the merger and those who held HLTH Common Stock prior to the merger).
 
The ongoing investigations of HLTH by the United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and the SEC could negatively impact the combined company after the merger and divert management attention from business operations
 
The United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina is conducting an investigation of our company. Based on the information available to HLTH as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, we believe that the investigation relates principally to issues of financial accounting improprieties for Medical Manager Corporation, a predecessor of HLTH (by its merger into HLTH in September 2000), and Medical Manager Health Systems, a former subsidiary of HLTH; however, we cannot be sure of the investigation’s exact scope or how long it may continue. In addition, HLTH understands that the SEC is conducting a formal investigation into this matter. Adverse developments in connection with the investigations, if any, including as a result of matters that the authorities or HLTH may discover, could have a negative impact on our company and on how it is perceived by investors and potential investors and customers and potential customers. In addition, the management effort and attention required to respond to the investigations and any such developments could have a negative impact on our business operations.
 
HLTH intends to continue to fully cooperate with the authorities in this matter. We believe that the amount of the expenses that we will incur in connection with the investigations will continue to be significant and we are not able to determine, at this time, what portion of those amounts may ultimately be covered by insurance or may ultimately be repaid to us by individuals to whom we are advancing amounts for their defense costs. In connection with the sale of Emdeon Practice Services to Sage Software, we have agreed to indemnify Sage Software with respect to this matter.
 
Negative conditions in the market for certain auction rate securities may result in HLTH incurring a loss on such investments
 
As of June 30, 2009, HLTH had a total of approximately $353.9 million (face value) of investments in certain auction rate securities (ARS), of which approximately $163.9 million (face value) is attributable to WebMD. Those ARS had a book value of $270.7 million as of June 30, 2009, of which $126.3 million is attributable to WebMD. The types of ARS investments that HLTH owns are backed by student loans, 97% of which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. HLTH and its subsidiaries do not own any other type of ARS investments.
 
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In the event HLTH needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments, it may not be able to do so until a future auction on these types of investments is successful or until a buyer is found outside the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling to purchase the investments at their carrying amount, HLTH would incur a loss on any such sales. In addition, the credit ratings on some of the ARS investments in our portfolio have been downgraded, and there may be additional such rating downgrades in the future. If uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue, these markets deteriorate further or ARS investments in our portfolio experience additional credit rating downgrades, there could be further fair value adjustments or other-than-temporary impairments in the carrying value of our ARS investments.
 


51


Table of Contents

Risks Related to HLTH’s Control of, and Existing Relationships with, WebMD
 
The following risks currently affect holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. These risks would, following the closing of the merger, cease to apply because HLTH would be merged into WebMD and would no longer control it.
 
The concentrated ownership of WebMD Common Stock by HLTH and certain corporate governance arrangements prevent WebMD’s other stockholders from influencing significant corporate decisions
 
WebMD currently has two classes of Common Stock:
 
  •  Class A Common Stock, which entitles the holder to one vote per share on all matters submitted to stockholders; and
 
  •  Class B Common Stock, which entitles the holder to five votes per share on all matters submitted to stockholders.
 
HLTH owns 100% of WebMD Class B Common Stock, which represents approximately 83.2% of WebMD outstanding Common Stock. These Class B shares collectively represent approximately 96% of the combined voting power of WebMD outstanding Common Stock. Given its ownership interest, HLTH is able to control the outcome of all matters submitted to WebMD stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and the merger (which HLTH has agreed, in the merger agreement, to vote to approve), but not including any amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of WebMD, including by merger, consolidation or otherwise, if such amendment would adversely affect the rights, powers or preferences of the WebMD Class A Common Stock. Accordingly, except as specifically provided in the merger agreement, either in its capacity as a stockholder or through its control of the WebMD Board of Directors, HLTH is able to control all key decisions regarding WebMD, including mergers or other business combinations and acquisitions, dispositions of assets, future issuances of WebMD Common Stock or other securities, the incurrence of debt by WebMD, the payment of dividends on WebMD Common Stock (including the frequency and the amount of dividends that would be payable on WebMD Common Stock, a substantial majority of which HLTH owns) and amendments to WebMD’s certificate of incorporation (other than amendments that would adversely affect the rights, powers and preferences of the WebMD Class A Common Stock) and bylaws. Further, as long as HLTH and its subsidiaries (excluding WebMD and its subsidiaries) continue to beneficially own shares representing at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of WebMD outstanding voting stock, it may take actions required to be taken at a meeting of stockholders without a meeting or a vote and without prior notice to holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. In addition, HLTH’s controlling interest may discourage a change of control that the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock may favor. Any of these provisions could be used by HLTH for its own advantage to the detriment of WebMD and its other stockholders. This in turn may have an adverse effect on the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock.
 
In the merger, the certificate of incorporation of WebMD will be amended and restated to eliminate the dual class structure of the Common Stock and to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock having a par value of $.01 per share from 500,000,000 shares to 650,000,000 shares. As a result of the merger, existing shares of WebMD’s Class B Common Stock will be canceled. Existing shares of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock will remain outstanding as shares of WebMD Common Stock. After the merger, WebMD Common Stock will continue to be quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “WBMD.”
 
The interests of HLTH may conflict with the interests of WebMD’s other stockholders
 
WebMD cannot assure you that the interests of HLTH will coincide with the interests of the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. For example, except as specifically provided in the merger agreement, HLTH could cause WebMD to make acquisitions that increase the amount of WebMD’s indebtedness or outstanding shares of Common Stock or sell revenue-generating assets. Also, HLTH or its directors and officers may allocate to HLTH or its other affiliates corporate opportunities that could have been directed to


52


Table of Contents

WebMD. So long as HLTH continues to own shares of WebMD Common Stock with significant voting power, HLTH will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control WebMD’s decisions.
 
Some of WebMD’s directors, officers and employees may have potential conflicts of interest as a result of having positions with or owning equity interests in HLTH
 
Martin J. Wygod, in addition to being Chairman of the Board of WebMD, is Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH. Some of WebMD’s other directors, officers and employees also serve as directors, officers or employees of HLTH. In addition, some of WebMD’s directors, officers and employees own shares of HLTH’s Common Stock. Furthermore, because WebMD’s officers and employees have participated in HLTH’s equity compensation plans and because service at WebMD will, so long as it is a majority-owned subsidiary of HLTH, qualify those persons for continued participation and continued vesting of equity awards under HLTH’s equity plans, many of WebMD’s officers and employees and some of its directors hold, and may continue to hold, options to purchase HLTH’s Common Stock and shares of HLTH’s restricted stock.
 
These arrangements and ownership interests or cash- or equity-based awards could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when WebMD’s directors or officers who own HLTH’s stock or stock options or who participate in HLTH’s benefit plans are faced with decisions that could have different implications for HLTH than they do for WebMD. WebMD cannot assure you that the provisions in WebMD’s restated certificate of incorporation will adequately address potential conflicts of interest or that potential conflicts of interest will be resolved in WebMD’s favor.
 
Provisions in WebMD’s organizational documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover, which could adversely affect the value of WebMD Class A Common Stock
 
WebMD’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Delaware corporate law, contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control or changes in management and the Board of Directors that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock might consider favorable and may prevent them from receiving a takeover premium for their shares. These provisions include, for example, WebMD’s classified board structure, the disproportionate voting rights of the WebMD Class B Common Stock (relative to the WebMD Class A Common Stock) and the authorization of the Board of Directors to issue up to 50 million shares of Preferred Stock without a stockholder vote. In addition, WebMD’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that after the time HLTH and its affiliates cease to own, in the aggregate, a majority of the combined voting power of WebMD’s outstanding capital stock, stockholders may not act by written consent and may not call special meetings. These provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some of WebMD’s stockholders. If a change of control or change in management is delayed or prevented, the market price of WebMD Class A Common Stock could decline.
 
In the merger, the certificate of incorporation of WebMD will be amended and restated, which we refer to as the Amended WebMD Charter, to eliminate the dual class structure of WebMD’s Common Stock. The Amended WebMD Charter will continue to provide that WebMD shall have a classified board structure and that stockholders may not act by written consent or call a special meeting.


53


Table of Contents

 
THE MERGER
 
Background of the Merger
 
In 2007, HLTH’s Board of Directors initiated a process of considering various strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value. Because it believed that the primary reason of many of the holders of HLTH Common Stock for owning those shares was HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD, the HLTH board eventually chose to focus on a transaction structure that would allow the HLTH stockholders to directly participate in the ownership of WebMD, while also reducing the capitalization of WebMD and unlocking the value of certain other non-core assets HLTH held at the time.
 
On February 20, 2008, HLTH and WebMD entered into a merger agreement (which we refer to as the 2008 Merger Agreement), pursuant to which HLTH would merge into WebMD (which we refer to as the Proposed 2008 Merger), with WebMD continuing as the surviving corporation. Pursuant to the Proposed 2008 Merger, each share of HLTH Common Stock would be converted into a combination of WebMD Common Stock and cash (and, in certain circumstances, a portion of the cash would be replaced by notes to be issued by WebMD).
 
The 2008 Merger Agreement resulted from extensive negotiations from October 2007 to February 2008 between HLTH and a special committee of the Board of Directors of WebMD (which we refer to as the 2008 Special Committee) and comprehensive due diligence by the 2008 Special Committee and its advisors with respect to HLTH. The 2008 Special Committee consisted of Stanley S. Trotman, Jr. and Jerome Keller, two independent members of the WebMD Board of Directors who were not on the HLTH Board of Directors, with Mr. Trotman appointed as its Chairman.
 
In connection with the Proposed 2008 Merger, HLTH retained O’Melveny & Myers LLP as outside counsel to HLTH and Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (which we refer to as Raymond James) to serve as its financial advisor. Raymond James is a nationally recognized investment banking services firm that regularly undertakes the valuation of investment securities in connection with public offerings, private placements, business combinations, and similar transactions.
 
The 2008 Special Committee conducted a process of selecting independent legal and financial advisors, through which it retained Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP (which we refer to as Cahill) to serve as its legal counsel, Abrams & Laster LLP (which we refer to as Abrams & Laster) to serve as its special Delaware counsel and Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc. (which we refer to as Morgan Joseph) to serve as its financial advisor with respect to the Proposed 2008 Merger. Morgan Joseph is a full service investment banking firm dedicated to serving middle market companies, with expertise in providing mergers and acquisitions advice, restructuring advice, private placements and public offering of debt and equity.
 
On August 26, 2008, in connection with the Proposed 2008 Merger, WebMD filed a joint proxy statement/prospectus on Form S-4 with the SEC. On October 14, 2008, WebMD filed an amended joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC. A further description of the background of the Proposed 2008 Merger can be found in that joint proxy statement/prospectus, as amended.
 
On October 19, 2008, pursuant to the terms of a termination agreement (which we refer to as the Termination Agreement), HLTH and WebMD mutually agreed, in light of the turmoil in financial markets and the decline in the price of both HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Common Stock, to terminate the 2008 Merger Agreement. The Termination Agreement was unanimously approved by the 2008 Special Committee and by the boards of directors of WebMD and HLTH. The boards of directors concluded that, by terminating the 2008 Merger Agreement, HLTH and WebMD would retain financial flexibility and be in a position to pursue potential acquisition opportunities expected to be available to companies with significant cash resources in a period of financial market uncertainty. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions of HLTH — Termination Agreement.”
 
In May 2009, representatives of HLTH met telephonically with representatives of WebMD and a member of the WebMD Board of Directors who had served on the 2008 Special Committee. During this call, HLTH informed WebMD of its interest in exploring the possibility of a potential transaction involving the


54


Table of Contents

combination of HLTH and WebMD into one company. Representatives of HLTH discussed a transaction that would take the form of an all-stock, tax-free direct merger of HLTH and WebMD, with WebMD surviving the merger. Further, representatives of HLTH discussed the key goals for such a transaction, which included, among other things, allowing HLTH’s stockholders to participate more directly in the ownership of WebMD commensurately with HLTH’s ownership interest in WebMD prior to the merger and reducing the expenses associated with maintaining two separate public companies, while eliminating HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD and enhancing the liquidity of WebMD Common Stock. HLTH indicated that it was interested in negotiating terms for such a transaction that would be fair to HLTH and its stockholders and also fair to WebMD Class A Common stockholders.
 
On May 21, 2009, the WebMD Board of Directors met telephonically. At this meeting, the WebMD Board of Directors discussed the conversation among representatives of HLTH, WebMD and the WebMD Board of Directors regarding a potential merger between HLTH and WebMD. Following that discussion, the WebMD Board of Directors formed a special committee (which we refer to as the WebMD Special Committee) consisting of Mr. Keller and Mr. Trotman, the two directors who served on the 2008 Special Committee, each of whom is an independent member of the WebMD Board of Directors and is not on the HLTH Board of Directors, to consider a potential transaction with HLTH. The WebMD Special Committee was vested with the power to, among other things, retain independent legal and financial advisors and to review and negotiate the terms and conditions of a potential transaction with HLTH on behalf of the holders of WebMD Common Stock other than HLTH and the officers and directors of HLTH, WebMD and their respective affiliates (who we refer to as the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders). The WebMD Board of Directors also directed WebMD’s management to fully support and cooperate with the WebMD Special Committee. The WebMD Special Committee appointed Mr. Trotman as its Chairman.
 
On May 21, 2009, HLTH retained Shearman & Sterling LLP (which we refer to as Shearman) as outside counsel to HLTH to advise it in connection with its discussions with WebMD regarding a potential transaction.
 
On May 28, 2009, representatives of HLTH contacted representatives of Raymond James to advise Raymond James that the WebMD Special Committee had been formed and that, based on the terms of the engagement letter between HLTH and Raymond James for the Proposed 2008 Merger, HLTH’s retention of Raymond James as a financial advisor continued to apply. From May 28, 2009 through delivery of its fairness opinion on June 17, 2009, Raymond James, pursuant to oral and written communications, requested and received from HLTH updated due diligence information, schedules and analyses. Raymond James also requested and received copies of the information supplied by HLTH and WebMD to the WebMD Special Committee.
 
During the week of May 25, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee selected independent legal and financial advisors. Based, among other reasons, on their familiarity with the issues that would be involved in a potential merger between HLTH and WebMD from their previous experience in representing the 2008 Special Committee, the WebMD Special Committee retained Cahill to serve as its legal counsel, Abrams & Laster to serve as its special Delaware counsel and Morgan Joseph to serve as its financial advisor.
 
During the week of May 25, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee and its representatives and representatives of the WebMD senior management team met telephonically on various occasions to discuss the due diligence review that would be required in connection with a possible transaction.
 
On June 2, 2009, representatives of Morgan Joseph provided a written due diligence request list to HLTH setting forth specific requests for information concerning the finances, business and operations of HLTH and WebMD and HLTH’s ongoing efforts to sell Porex.
 
During the first week of June 2009, Cahill and Morgan Joseph, with the cooperation of HLTH representatives, conducted a significant portion of the due diligence required for the WebMD Special Committee to evaluate a new merger proposal, including confirming and updating the due diligence that was conducted in connection with the Proposed 2008 Merger. Contacts between representatives and advisors of HLTH regarding such investigation continued throughout the period in which discussions regarding a potential merger were being held between HLTH and the WebMD Special Committee and involved representatives of HLTH, WebMD and their respective advisors.


55


Table of Contents

On June 9, 2009, the HLTH Board of Directors met telephonically. Also in attendance were representatives of the senior management team of HLTH and representatives of Shearman and Raymond James. At this meeting, representatives of HLTH’s senior management team updated the HLTH Board of Directors on the status of the discussions with WebMD regarding the proposed merger. Also at this meeting, representatives of HLTH management advised the Board that HLTH management was considering the following structure for a potential transaction between HLTH and WebMD:
 
  •  a direct merger of HLTH into WebMD, with WebMD being the surviving corporation;
 
  •  in the merger, HLTH Common Stock would be converted into WebMD Common Stock based upon a fixed exchange ratio; and
 
  •  WebMD stockholders, other than HLTH, would continue to own their shares of WebMD Common Stock following the merger and WebMD’s dual class stock structure would be eliminated.
 
Upon completion of the transaction, WebMD would assume HLTH’s outstanding options and convertible notes, with customary adjustments to reflect the effect of the exchange ratio in the proposed merger.
 
The representatives of HLTH management indicated that it was HLTH’s goal to propose a transaction that would be fair to both HLTH stockholders and to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock. They then described certain of the objectives and benefits of such a transaction to stockholders of HLTH, including the following:
 
  •  allowing HLTH stockholders to have direct ownership in WebMD in an amount commensurate with their ownership interest in WebMD prior to the merger through a tax-free transaction;
 
  •  eliminating inefficiencies associated with having two separate public companies and managing intercompany affairs; and
 
  •  increasing WebMD’s ability to raise capital, to obtain financing and to use its equity securities to make acquisitions;
 
They noted that the last point would also benefit holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock and that there would be other benefits to holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock, including:
 
  •  increasing the public float and liquidity of WebMD shares; and
 
  •  eliminating the controlling block of WebMD shares held by HLTH.
 
HLTH management indicated that it expected to propose to the WebMD Special Committee a transaction having the structure described above and an exchange ratio that would reflect HLTH’s existing ownership interest in WebMD, increased by an amount to reflect HLTH’s views regarding the net assets of HLTH (other than its ownership interest in WebMD) that would be acquired by WebMD in the merger. The HLTH Board of Directors was not asked to approve specific terms for such a transaction at that time, but did direct HLTH management to negotiate with the WebMD Special Committee regarding a proposed transaction having the structure discussed at this meeting.
 
On June 11, 2009, representatives of HLTH and its financial and legal advisors met telephonically with the WebMD Special Committee and its financial and legal advisors as well as representatives of WebMD management. During this call, representatives of HLTH management outlined HLTH’s proposed terms for the merger. Under HLTH’s proposal, HLTH would be merged with and into WebMD in a tax-free transaction in which each share of HLTH Common Stock would be converted into 0.4507 shares of WebMD Common Stock. The proposed 0.4507 exchange ratio was equal to the sum of 0.4444, which was the per-HLTH-share amount of the WebMD Common Stock owned by HLTH, plus 0.0063 (which we refer to as the Incremental Exchange Ratio), which represented the value of the net assets (other than HLTH’s ownership of WebMD) that would be acquired by WebMD in the merger attributable to the holders of WebMD Common Stock other than HLTH.
 
Immediately following the telephone conference, Shearman, on behalf of HLTH, delivered a term sheet to the WebMD Special Committee and its legal and financial advisors summarizing HLTH’s proposed terms of


56


Table of Contents

the merger between HLTH and WebMD. Later that day, Shearman, on behalf of HLTH, delivered a draft of the merger agreement for the proposed merger between HLTH and WebMD to the WebMD Special Committee and its legal and financial advisors for their review and consideration. Except as required to reflect the financial terms contained in the term sheet, the draft merger agreement prepared by HLTH was based on the 2008 Merger Agreement, containing similar representations, warranties, covenants and other terms and conditions.
 
On June 12, 2009, the Board of Directors of HLTH met telephonically to receive a status update from HLTH management and its legal and financial advisors about the proposed merger. At that meeting, HLTH management reported on the meeting of June 11, 2009 and discussed the expected next steps for the proposed merger.
 
On June 12, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee met telephonically with Cahill, Abrams & Laster and Morgan Joseph to discuss HLTH’s proposal. Among the topics discussed were the incremental assets to be received by WebMD in the merger, consisting of HLTH’s cash and investments (including ARS), its NOL carryforwards and Porex, and the incremental liabilities WebMD would assume, consisting of HLTH’s convertible notes, certain tax liabilities, contingent liabilities and severance costs and other expenses relating to the transaction. The WebMD Special Committee also discussed HLTH’s ongoing efforts to sell Porex and matters relating to the valuation of the ARS. The WebMD Special Committee’s advisors said they were continuing their due diligence and analysis and would be in a position to report their conclusions the following week. In the days thereafter, the WebMD Special Committee’s advisors finalized their due diligence.
 
Throughout the week of June 15, 2009, representatives of HLTH, the WebMD Special Committee, Shearman and Cahill had telephonic conferences to discuss the terms of the proposed merger agreement and related documentation. In connection with these discussions, the parties exchanged multiple drafts of the proposed merger agreement and related documentation. Each of HLTH’s and WebMD’s senior management teams met regularly with their respective advisors to receive an update on the status of the negotiations, review issues and concerns that arose during negotiations and provide direction and instruction to their advisors.
 
On the afternoon of June 17, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee met telephonically with Cahill and Morgan Joseph to discuss HLTH’s proposal. Morgan Joseph reviewed its analysis of the incremental assets and liabilities to be assumed by WebMD in the merger and Cahill described the terms of the draft merger agreement. Among the topics discussed were the benefit of removing WebMD’s controlling stockholder, which would allow the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders to participate in any future control premium for WebMD, the risks associated with acquiring Porex in the merger, the potential dilutive effect of the merger on WebMD’s earnings and EBITDA and the potential dilution of the ownership of the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders from WebMD’s assumption of HLTH’s options and convertible notes. At the conclusion of the meeting, the WebMD Special Committee authorized Cahill to communicate a counter-proposal to HLTH which included, among other things, the elimination of the Incremental Exchange Ratio and a condition that the merger be approved by a majority of the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
 
Immediately following the meeting, Cahill, on behalf of the WebMD Special Committee, delivered the WebMD Special Committee’s counter-proposal to HLTH and its advisors.
 
Later that day, in response to the WebMD Special Committee’s counter-proposal, HLTH met telephonically with its legal and financial advisors.
 
On the evening of June 17, 2009, HLTH and its legal and financial advisors met telephonically with the WebMD Special Committee and its legal and financial advisors. HLTH stated that it would be willing to proceed with the merger without an Incremental Exchange Ratio and to instead use a fixed exchange ratio of 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock for each share of HLTH Common Stock, but that it would not be willing to proceed with a transaction conditioned on approval by a majority of unaffiliated WebMD stockholders because, in light of the small public float of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock, the requirement for such a vote could permit the holders of a relatively small number of shares to block the merger. Following these meetings, representatives of HLTH contacted Cahill to discuss a proposed resolution of the remaining open issues under the draft merger agreement.


57


Table of Contents

After receiving HLTH’s counter-proposal, the WebMD Special Committee met telephonically with its advisors to discuss HLTH’s proposal and determined, in light of the benefits of the transaction and concessions that HLTH had agreed to on the other issues, to move forward with the merger on the basis proposed by HLTH. The WebMD Special Committee then instructed Cahill to communicate to Shearman that the WebMD Special Committee had accepted HLTH’s latest proposal and instructed Morgan Joseph to prepare its fairness opinion with respect to the merger consideration to be paid in the merger based upon the agreed terms.
 
On the evening of June 17, 2009, the HLTH Board of Directors met telephonically. Representatives of Shearman and Raymond James and HLTH’s senior management team also participated in this meeting. Representatives of HLTH’s senior management team updated the HLTH Board of Directors on negotiations with WebMD since the previous meeting. Representatives of Shearman reviewed the fiduciary duties of the directors in connection with the HLTH Board of Directors’ consideration of the proposed merger with WebMD and described the principal terms of the proposed merger agreement and related transactions. Representatives of Raymond James made a presentation regarding the financial analysis it had performed in respect of HLTH and WebMD, and described the fairness opinion it was prepared to deliver to the HLTH Board of Directors if requested. Extended discussion followed among the directors and their advisors, with numerous questions addressed by the HLTH Board of Directors regarding the draft merger agreement, the terms of the proposed transaction and the process between the signing of definitive agreements and the closing of the transaction. Following these discussions, Raymond James delivered an oral opinion, confirmed by a subsequent written opinion dated June 17, 2009, that the exchange ratio contemplated by the merger agreement would be fair to holders of HLTH Common Stock from a financial point of view, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations contained in its written opinion. After considering both factors supporting the proposed merger and factors weighing against it (as more fully described below under “— HLTH’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger), the members of the HLTH Board of Directors then unanimously:
 
  •  determined that the terms of the merger agreement and the proposed transaction were substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of, HLTH and the holders of HLTH Common Stock, as well as being substantively and procedurally fair to the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock;
 
  •  declared the merger agreement advisable, approved and adopted the merger agreement and authorized and approved the proposed merger; and
 
  •  recommended that holders of HLTH Common Stock approve and adopt the merger agreement and approve the proposed merger.
 
Also on the evening of June 17, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee met telephonically with its advisors. Representatives of Morgan Joseph reviewed with the members of the WebMD Special Committee their presentation and valuation analysis, copies of which had been previously provided to them, and delivered Morgan Joseph’s opinion, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations contained therein, that the consideration to be paid to the stockholders of HLTH in the proposed transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. Representatives of Cahill then reviewed the merger agreement with the members of the WebMD Special Committee. After considering the factors weighing in favor or against the proposed transaction, including certain intangible benefits beyond the scope of Morgan Joseph’s valuation analysis, the members of the WebMD Special Committee concluded that, on balance, they favored the proposed transaction. For a discussion of the factors considered, see “— WebMD’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger.” At the end of the meeting, the WebMD Special Committee unanimously:
 
  •  determined that the terms of the merger agreement and the proposed transaction were substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of, WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD stockholders;
 
  •  approved the merger agreement and the proposed merger;
 
  •  recommended that the WebMD Board of Directors approve the merger agreement and the proposed merger; and
 
  •  recommended that the stockholders of WebMD adopt the merger agreement and approve the proposed merger.


58


Table of Contents

 
Shortly after the WebMD Special Committee meeting, a telephonic meeting of the WebMD Board of Directors was held to consider the proposed transaction. At that meeting, the WebMD Special Committee summarized for the WebMD Board of Directors the work it and its advisors had done regarding the transaction. The WebMD Special Committee informed the WebMD Board of Directors of the opinion it had received from Morgan Joseph and the conclusions and recommendations of the WebMD Special Committee regarding the transaction, as described above. Based on the recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee, the WebMD Board of Directors unanimously:
 
  •  determined that the terms of the merger agreement and the proposed transaction were substantively and procedurally fair to, and in the best interests of, WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD stockholders;
 
  •  declared the merger agreement advisable, approved and adopted the merger agreement and authorized and approved the proposed merger; and
 
  •  recommended that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock approve and adopt the merger agreement and approve the proposed merger.
 
Following the approval by the boards of directors of WebMD and HLTH, the merger agreement was executed and delivered by the respective parties on the evening of June 17, 2009 and the transaction was publicly announced prior to the opening of the financial markets on June 18, 2009.
 
HLTH’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger
 
As discussed above in “— Background of the Merger,” the HLTH Board of Directors proposed the merger with WebMD to simplify the corporate structure of the two companies, in a transaction that would be fair to both the stockholders of HLTH and the holders of Class A Common Stock of WebMD. The HLTH Board believed that there were no longer any significant advantages in maintaining a separate public company above WebMD, since HLTH’s only remaining other business is Porex, which it is in the process of divesting. In determining the fairness of the merger and unanimously approving the merger agreement and the merger, the HLTH Board of Directors considered a number of factors which, in the opinion of the HLTH Board of Directors, supported the merger, including:
 
  •  As a result of the transaction, HLTH stockholders would have direct ownership of shares of WebMD, with the exchange ratio of 0.4444 resulting in the ownership stake of HLTH stockholders in the combined company being, in the aggregate, substantially the same as HLTH’s ownership interest in WebMD prior to the merger, after taking into consideration dilution from certain outstanding options and shares of restricted stock.
 
  •  The expectation that the WebMD Common Stock would be received by the HLTH stockholders on a tax-free basis.
 
  •  WebMD Common Stock as the merger consideration enables HLTH stockholders to continue to benefit from future growth in WebMD’s businesses, as well as from any increase in the value of the net assets of HLTH, other than its ownership interest in WebMD, which will be owned by the combined company following the merger.
 
  •  The WebMD Common Stock to be received by the HLTH stockholders is expected to have similar liquidity to existing HLTH Common Stock and greater liquidity than WebMD Class A Common Stock has prior to the merger.
 
  •  The expectation that the merger would increase WebMD’s ability to raise capital and obtain financing.
 
  •  The merger will eliminate inefficiencies associated with:
 
  •  managing intercompany affairs between HLTH and WebMD; and
 
  •  having two separate public companies, with separate shareholder bases;


59


Table of Contents

 
although, in compliance with applicable financial reporting standards, such efficiencies will not be reflected in the pro forma financial statements included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
 
  •  In connection with the sale of Porex and the merger, corporate overhead would be reduced to reflect the size required to service the surviving company’s operations and to reflect the elimination of one of the two public companies currently being maintained.
 
  •  The high likelihood of closing the proposed transaction.
 
  •  The financial presentation of Raymond James to the HLTH Board of Directors on June 17, 2009, including Raymond James’s opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio for the proposed merger, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations contained in its written opinion. Raymond James’s opinion is described under the heading “— Opinion of HLTH’s Financial Advisor, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.”
 
The HLTH Board of Directors also considered a variety of risks and other potentially negative factors concerning the merger. The material risks and potentially negative factors considered by the HLTH Board of Directors were as follows:
 
  •  The consummation of the merger would result in the elimination of the opportunity to receive, through a sale to a third party, a control premium on HLTH’s interest in WebMD that would not be shared with the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
 
  •  The fact that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock will have the benefit of the combined company receiving the net assets of HLTH, other than its ownership interest in WebMD, the value of which may increase following the merger, a portion of which would then be shared with the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock.
 
  •  While HLTH expects to complete the merger, there can be no assurances that all conditions to the parties’ obligations to complete the merger agreement will be satisfied and, as a result, the merger may not be completed. In addition, if the merger is not completed, HLTH would pay the expenses of both parties.
 
  •  The fact that certain of HLTH’s directors and executive officers have interests in connection with the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of HLTH’s stockholders generally (for further information, see “— Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger”).
 
  •  The restrictions on the conduct of HLTH’s business prior to completion of the merger, requiring HLTH to conduct its business only in the ordinary course, subject to specific limitations, which may delay or prevent HLTH from undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger.
 
  •  The substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the merger, including the transaction expenses arising from the merger, as well as certain severance payments that may be required to be made to officers and other employees of HLTH.
 
  •  Each of the factors described above in “Risk Factors — Risks Related to the Merger for Holders of HLTH Common Stock.”
 
The HLTH Board of Directors concluded, however, that these risks and potentially negative factors were outweighed by the potential benefits of the merger.
 
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered and given weight by the HLTH board in connection with the fairness of the merger to the stockholders of HLTH is not intended to be exhaustive but is believed to include all material factors considered by the HLTH board. The HLTH board did not find it practicable to assign, and did not assign, relative weights to the individual factors considered in reaching its conclusions as to the fairness of the proposed merger to the HLTH stockholders. Rather, its fairness determination was made after consideration of all of the foregoing factors as a whole.


60


Table of Contents

Recommendation of the HLTH Board of Directors
 
On June 17, 2009, the HLTH Board of Directors, after carefully considering the factors described above, including the fairness opinion of Raymond James to the HLTH Board of Directors, unanimously determined that the merger is advisable, procedurally and substantively fair to and in the best interests of HLTH and its stockholders and approved the merger, the merger agreement and each of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the submission of the merger agreement to the HLTH stockholders for adoption.
 
WebMD’s Purposes and Reasons for the Merger
 
Because a transaction involving the combination of HLTH and WebMD would have the effect of eliminating HLTH’s controlling interest in WebMD and enhance the liquidity of WebMD Common Stock by significantly increasing the public float, the WebMD Board of Directors determined to evaluate any proposal for such a transaction and appointed a special committee of independent directors to negotiate the terms of and recommend the approval of any potential transaction. Following such negotiations, the WebMD Special Committee and the WebMD Board of Directors concluded that the transaction was in the best interests of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. In determining the fairness of the merger and unanimously recommending approval of the merger agreement and the merger to the WebMD Board of Directors, the WebMD Special Committee also considered a number of factors which, in the opinion of the members of the WebMD Special Committee, supported the WebMD Special Committee’s recommendation, including:
 
  •  By removing HLTH as WebMD’s controlling stockholder, WebMD’s stockholders will be able to participate in any premium from a change-of-control transaction.
 
  •  By significantly increasing its public float, the merger should enhance the liquidity of WebMD’s common stock.
 
  •  The merger will simplify corporate ownership structure and increase transparency for investors.
 
  •  The merger should improve how WebMD is perceived by investors and increase WebMD’s ability to raise capital and obtain financing.
 
  •  The merger will eliminate management and board of director inefficiencies associated with managing current intercompany affairs and will allow them to devote their full attention to the growth of WebMD’s business.
 
  •  The expectation that the merger will qualify as a reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes.
 
  •  The fact that, under the terms of the merger agreement, WebMD (with the approval of the WebMD Special Committee) may terminate the merger agreement if the WebMD Special Committee determines in good faith, after consultation with its legal counsel, that it is required by its fiduciary duties to terminate the merger agreement in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal.
 
  •  All expenses incurred by either party and the WebMD Special Committee in connection with the merger and any related transactions will be paid by HLTH.
 
The WebMD Special Committee also considered a variety of risks and other potentially negative factors concerning the merger. The material risks and potentially negative factors considered by the WebMD Special Committee were as follows:
 
  •  By agreeing to acquire Porex in light of HLTH’s continuing efforts to sell it, WebMD is assuming the divestiture risk with respect to a non-core, slower-growth business and such divestiture will continue to require the attention of management.
 
  •  Retaining Porex could cause WebMD to be viewed by securities analysts as no longer being a “pure play” internet company, particularly if WebMD is required to stop treating Porex as a “discontinued


61


Table of Contents

  operation,” which could have adverse consequences for the valuation multiple at which WebMD’s stock trades.
 
  •  Following the merger, the ownership of the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders in WebMD will be subject to dilution from the exercise of HLTH’s stock options and convertible notes that will be assumed by WebMD.
 
  •  The issuance of a significant amount of WebMD Common Stock into the markets, as would happen in the merger, could cause a decline in its price and the increased size of WebMD’s public float thereafter could adversely affect the price at which it trades, to the extent it has been supported by a “scarcity” premium, as some analysts have speculated.
 
  •  Following the merger, the combined company is expected to initially have slightly higher corporate overhead expenses than WebMD currently has, which could affect the trading price of WebMD Common Stock after the merger.
 
  •  Delays or difficulties in eliminating certain redundant costs of the two companies could reduce earnings beyond the anticipated slight increase in corporate overhead costs.
 
  •  The closing prices of WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock on June 17, 2009, the date the merger agreement was executed, were $28.21 and $11.76, respectively. The merger consideration had a value on such date of $12.54 per HLTH share, representing a premium of approximately 6.6% over the $11.76 closing price of HLTH Common Stock, which is higher than the premiums in certain other controlling-stockholder transactions.
 
  •  WebMD stockholders will be subject to risks related to any litigation pending against HLTH.
 
  •  The fact that certain of WebMD’s directors and executive officers have interests in connection with the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of WebMD stockholders generally (for further information, see “— Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger”).
 
  •  The restrictions on the conduct of WebMD’s business prior to completion of the merger, requiring WebMD to conduct its business only in the ordinary course, subject to specific limitations, which may delay or prevent WebMD from undertaking business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the merger.
 
  •  The costs to be incurred by WebMD following the merger, including certain severance payments that may be required to be made to officers and other employees of HLTH.
 
  •  The risk that anticipated cost savings and other benefits sought in the merger might not be fully realized.
 
  •  Each of the factors described above in “Risk Factors — Risks Related to the Merger for Holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock.”
 
The WebMD Special Committee concluded, however, that these risks and potentially negative factors were outweighed by the potential benefits of the merger.
 
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered and given weight by the WebMD Special Committee in connection with the fairness of the merger to the stockholders of WebMD is not intended to be exhaustive but is believed to include all material factors considered by the WebMD Special Committee. The WebMD Special Committee did not find it practicable to assign, and did not assign, relative weights to the individual factors considered in reaching its conclusions as to the fairness of the proposed merger to unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. Rather, its fairness determination was made after consideration of all of the foregoing factors as a whole.
 
In addition to determining that the merger is advisable and in the best interests of WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, the WebMD Special Committee determined that the transaction was procedurally and substantively fair to unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, despite the fact that a majority vote of unaffiliated WebMD stockholders is not a condition to the merger. HLTH opposed making the merger


62


Table of Contents

contingent on such a vote because, in light of the small public float of WebMD’s Class A Common Stock, the requirement for such a vote could permit the holders of a relatively small number of shares to block the merger. The WebMD Special Committee believes that a number of factors support the determination of procedural and substantive fairness to WebMD and unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, including the following:
 
  •  The unanimous recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee in favor of the merger and related transactions in light of (i) the composition of the two-member non-employee WebMD Special Committee, each of whom the WebMD Board of Directors had previously determined were unaffiliated with HLTH and (ii) the review of HLTH’s business, assets, liabilities and financial condition by the WebMD Special Committee’s financial advisors.
 
  •  The WebMD Special Committee retained its own nationally recognized legal advisor, Cahill, which the WebMD Special Committee determined had no relationship creating a potential conflict.
 
  •  The WebMD Special Committee retained its own nationally recognized financial advisor, Morgan Joseph, which the WebMD Special Committee determined had no relationships that would compromise its independence.
 
  •  The financial presentation of Morgan Joseph to the WebMD Special Committee on June 17, 2009 and its opinion addressed to the WebMD Special Committee that the merger consideration to be paid by WebMD to HLTH stockholders in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders. Morgan Joseph’s opinion is described in detail under the heading “— Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.”
 
  •  The merger consideration and other terms and conditions of the merger agreement were the result of negotiations between HLTH and the WebMD Special Committee and their respective financial and legal advisors following thorough due diligence.
 
  •  The WebMD Special Committee had the exclusive authority to negotiate the terms of the merger on behalf of WebMD.
 
  •  The WebMD Special Committee had the power to reject the proposed transaction and the resolutions establishing the WebMD Special Committee provided that the WebMD Board of Directors would not approve any strategic transaction with HLTH without the prior, favorable recommendation of the WebMD Special Committee.
 
  •  WebMD’s business, financial strength and prospects made it viable as a stand-alone entity.
 
  •  The HLTH Board of Directors did not participate in or have any influence over the conclusion reached by the WebMD Special Committee or the negotiating positions of the WebMD Special Committee.
 
Recommendations of the WebMD Special Committee and the Board of Directors
 
The WebMD Special Committee oversaw the performance of financial and legal due diligence by its advisors and conducted an extensive review, evaluation and negotiation of the terms and conditions of the merger on behalf of WebMD. The WebMD Special Committee, after giving careful consideration to the presentation made by Morgan Joseph, determined by a unanimous vote held at a meeting on June 17, 2009, that the merger is advisable, procedurally and substantively fair to and in the best interests of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders.
 
On June 17, 2009, the WebMD Special Committee unanimously recommended to the WebMD Board of Directors that it approve the merger, the merger agreement and each of the transactions contemplated thereby. The WebMD Board of Directors adopted the conclusions and analysis of the WebMD Special Committee regarding the fairness of the transaction and, following the WebMD Special Committee’s recommendation, the WebMD board determined that the merger is advisable, procedurally and substantively fair to and in the best interests of WebMD and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders, approved the merger, the merger agreement and each of the transactions contemplated thereby, including the issuance of the WebMD Common Stock and the


63


Table of Contents

submission of the merger agreement to the WebMD stockholders for adoption, and recommended that holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock approve and adopt the merger agreement and approve the proposed merger.
 
Opinion of HLTH’s Financial Advisor, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
 
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated November 7, 2007, HLTH retained Raymond James as its financial advisor in connection with the proposed merger. At the meeting of the HLTH Board of Directors on June 17, 2009, Raymond James gave its opinion that, as of such date and based upon, and subject to, various qualifications and assumptions described with respect to its opinion, the exchange ratio for the proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of HLTH Common Stock.
 
The full text of the written opinion of Raymond James, dated June 17, 2009, which sets forth assumptions made, matters considered, and limits on the scope of review undertaken, is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Raymond James’s opinion, which is addressed to the HLTH Board of Directors, is directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to holders of HLTH Common Stock, of the exchange ratio for the proposed merger. Raymond James expressed no opinion on the relative merits of the merger compared to any alternative that might be available to HLTH or the terms of the merger agreement. Raymond James’s opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of HLTH Common Stock as to how such stockholder should vote at the HLTH Annual Meeting and does not address any other aspect of the proposed merger or any related transaction. Raymond James’s opinion does not address the fairness of the proposed merger to, or any consideration that may be received by, the holders of any other class of securities, creditors or constituencies of HLTH, or the underlying decision by HLTH or its Board of Directors to engage in the proposed merger. Raymond James expressed no opinion as to the price at which HLTH Common Stock, WebMD Common Stock, or any other securities would trade at any future time. In addition, Raymond James did not express any view or opinion as to the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the amount or nature of any compensation payable to or to be received by HLTH’s officers, directors, or employees, or any class of such persons, in connection with the merger. Raymond James’s opinion was authorized for issuance by the Fairness Opinion Committee of Raymond James. Raymond James has consented to the inclusion of its written opinion and the summary of the opinion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In giving such consent, Raymond James does not admit that it comes within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder, nor does Raymond James admit that it is an expert with respect to any part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, within the meaning of the terms “experts” as used in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder. The summary of the opinion of Raymond James set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Holders of HLTH Common Stock are urged to read this opinion in its entirety.
 
In arriving at its opinion, Raymond James, among other things:
 
  •  reviewed the financial terms and conditions of the merger as described in a draft of the merger agreement dated June 17, 2009;
 
  •  reviewed the audited financial statements for each of HLTH and WebMD as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and the unaudited financial statements for the three month period ended March 31, 2009;
 
  •  reviewed for each of HLTH and WebMD the annual reports filed on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and the quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009;
 
  •  reviewed certain other publicly available information on HLTH and WebMD;
 
  •  reviewed certain other financial data and forecasts, balance sheet estimates, and other operating information requested from and provided by HLTH and WebMD;


64


Table of Contents

 
  •  reviewed the historical stock price and trading activity for the shares of HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Class A Common Stock;
 
  •  discussed their respective businesses, operations, historical financial results, and future prospects with certain management team members of HLTH and WebMD;
 
  •  discussed with senior management of HLTH and WebMD certain information related to the aforementioned; and
 
  •  considered such other quantitative and qualitative factors that it deemed to be relevant to its evaluation.
 
Financial forecasts and projections are subjective in many respects and reflect numerous assumptions regarding general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters. None of HLTH, Raymond James or any of their respective affiliates or representatives makes any representation to any person regarding the financial forecasts and projections reviewed in connection with Raymond James’s opinion. Stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the financial forecasts and projections because they are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. There can be no assurance that the financial forecasts and projections will be achieved.
 
Raymond James did not assume responsibility for independent verification of, and did not independently verify, any information, whether publicly available or furnished to it by HLTH or any other party, including, without limitation, any financial information, forecasts, or projections considered in connection with the rendering of its opinion. For purposes of its opinion, Raymond James assumed and relied upon, with permission from the HLTH Board of Directors, the accuracy and completeness of all such information. Raymond James did not conduct a physical inspection of any of the properties or assets, and did not prepare or obtain any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets (including, without limitation, HLTH’s discontinued operations and related assets, the ARS owned by each of HLTH and WebMD, or other investment securities of HLTH and WebMD) or liabilities (contingent or otherwise), of either entity. With respect to financial forecasts and estimates, along with other information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Raymond James, Raymond James has (i) assumed, with permission from the HLTH Board of Directors, that such forecasts, estimates and other such information and data have been reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of management and (ii) relied upon each party to advise Raymond James promptly if any information previously provided became inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of its review.
 
In rendering its opinion, Raymond James assumed that the merger would be consummated on the terms described in the merger agreement. Furthermore, Raymond James assumed, in all respects material to its analysis, that the representations and warranties of each party contained in the merger agreement are true and correct, that each party will perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under the merger agreement, and that all conditions to the consummation of the merger will be satisfied without being waived. Raymond James also assumed that all material governmental, regulatory, or other consents and approvals will be obtained and that, in the course of obtaining any necessary governmental, regulatory, or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the merger, as contemplated by the merger agreement, no restrictions will be imposed or amendments, modifications, or waivers made that would have any material adverse effect on HLTH or WebMD. In the capacity of rendering the opinion, Raymond James expressed no opinion regarding the structure or tax consequences of the merger agreement, or the availability or advisability of any alternatives to the merger.
 
Raymond James’s opinion is necessarily based on economic, market, and other conditions and the information made available to Raymond James as of June 17, 2009. It should be understood that subsequent developments could affect Raymond James’s opinion and that, despite Raymond James’s agreement under its engagement letter to deliver subsequent or bring-down fairness opinions if requested by the HLTH Board of Directors, Raymond James does not have any obligation to reaffirm its opinion.


65


Table of Contents

Summary of Financial Analyses Conducted by Raymond James
 
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses underlying Raymond James’s opinion, dated June 17, 2009, delivered to the HLTH Board of Directors in connection with the merger at a meeting of the HLTH Board of Directors on June 17, 2009. The order of the analyses described below does not represent the relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Raymond James or by the HLTH Board of Directors. Considering such data without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses could create a misleading or incomplete view of Raymond James’s financial analyses.
 
In conducting its investigation, performing its analyses, and in arriving at its opinion, Raymond James took into account such accepted financial and investment banking procedures and considerations as it deemed relevant, including the review of: (i) the current and projected financial position and results of operations of HLTH and WebMD; (ii) the historical market prices and trading activity of the HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Class A Common Stock; (iii) the historical and projected revenues, operating earnings, net income, and capitalization of WebMD and certain other publicly held companies in businesses we believe to be similar, in whole or in part, to WebMD; (iv) the discounted present value of projected future cash flows of WebMD; and (v) the general condition of the securities markets.
 
In arriving at its opinion, Raymond James did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. Accordingly, Raymond James believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, without considering all analyses, would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its opinion.
 
The following summarizes the material financial analyses presented by Raymond James to the HLTH Board of Directors at its meeting on June 17, 2009 and considered by Raymond James in rendering its opinion. The description below explains Raymond James’s methodology for evaluating the exchange ratio. No company or transaction used in certain of the analyses described below was deemed to be directly comparable to HLTH, WebMD, or the merger, and the summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by Raymond James.
 
Ownership Analysis:  The merger agreement calls for each HLTH stockholder to receive 0.4444 shares of WebMD Common Stock for each share of HLTH Common Stock held. As a result of the merger, 48.1 million shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock owned by HLTH will be canceled, the division of WebMD Common Stock into classes will be eliminated, and HLTH shareholders, on a fully diluted basis using the treasury stock method to account for the impact of in-the-money options, will receive an aggregate 48.0 million shares of WebMD Common Stock. Post-merger, HLTH shareholders, on a fully diluted basis, will own approximately 79.9% of WebMD, which is substantially similar to HLTH’s pre-merger WebMD ownership of approximately 79.9%.
 
Historical Stock Trading Analysis:  Raymond James analyzed the performance of HLTH Common Stock between June 15, 2007 and June 17, 2009. During this period, HLTH Common Stock achieved a closing price high of $16.19 and a closing price low of $7.79. The historical stock trading analysis was presented to the Board of Directors of HLTH as background information to compare to the closing stock price of HLTH Common Stock of $11.76 on June 17, 2009 prior to signing the merger agreement. Raymond James also presented a stock price histogram, for the trailing twelve-month and six-month periods, illustrating that approximately 85.0% of the trading activity in HLTH Common Stock during the six months prior to announcing the merger occurred at prices below the $11.76 closing stock price on June 17, 2009.
 
Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis:  Raymond James analyzed the historical exchange ratio implied by the terms of the merger agreement and the relative trading prices of HLTH Common Stock and WebMD Common Stock between June 15, 2007 and June 17, 2009. The historical exchange ratio was calculated by dividing the daily HLTH Common Stock per share closing price by the WebMD Common Stock per share closing price on the same day. During this period, the historical 30-day moving average exchange ratio reached a high of 0.5118 and a low of 0.2648 and averaged 0.3788.


66


Table of Contents

Raymond James calculated the historical exchange ratio implied by the methodology described above as of the closing price on the following dates:
 
  •  June 17, 2009: 0.4169 (at market exchange ratio one day prior to announcing the Agreement)
 
  •  October 20, 2008: 0.4168 (the day of announcing termination of the previous merger between HLTH and WebMD)
 
  •  February 20, 2008: 0.3468 (one day prior to announcing the previous merger between HLTH and WebMD)
 
Sum-of-Parts Analysis:  Raymond James provided the Board of Directors of HLTH with an estimated sum-of-parts valuation for HLTH to illustrate the estimated per share equity value of HLTH that may or may not be achievable in a disaggregation scenario as compared to HLTH’s $11.76 closing stock price on June 17, 2009. The sum-of-parts analysis included the combination of: (i) the public market value of HLTH’s ownership in WebMD, with a range of estimated divestiture proceeds of $12.44 to $12.40; (ii) the estimated capitalization of HLTH, excluding WebMD cash and cash equivalents but including (a) HLTH cash and cash equivalents, (b) HLTH ARS (at 75% of face value per the HLTH agreement with Citigroup) and (c) the face value of outstanding HLTH convertible debt securities, with estimated divestiture proceeds of ($0.89); (iii) the estimated proceeds to be received from the sale of Porex, net of applicable taxes and transaction expenses, with a range of estimated divestiture proceeds of $0.96 to $1.24; and (iv) the value of the residual HLTH NOL carryforward to be delivered to WebMD in the merger, with a range of estimated divestiture proceeds of $0.77 to $0.75. The analysis indicated a total sum-of-parts values ranging from $13.28 to $13.50. The number of diluted HLTH shares used in the calculation ranged from 109.1 million to 109.4 million, as the number of diluted HLTH shares increases as the total per share value of HLTH increases due to the impact of a larger number of in-the-money options.
 
Standalone WebMD Valuation:  Raymond James developed a view of the standalone valuation for WebMD to compare with the closing stock price of WebMD on June 17, 2009. Analyses comprising this valuation included a selected public companies analysis, a selected transactions analysis, and a discounted cash flow analysis. Raymond James noted that the reasons for, and circumstances surrounding, each of the companies and transactions reviewed were diverse and that the multiples fluctuated based on perceived growth, synergies, strategic value, trading history, and other factors. None of the companies considered is identical to WebMD and, accordingly, Raymond James’s analyses necessarily involved complex considerations and judgments concerning the differences in financial and operating characteristics and other factors that would necessarily affect the comparison.
 
Selected Public Companies Analysis
 
Raymond James compared certain operating, financial, trading, and valuation information for WebMD to certain publicly available operating, financial, trading, and valuation information for eight selected companies, each of which Raymond James believes to have a business model reasonably similar, in whole or in part, to that of WebMD. These selected companies included:
 
  •  Bankrate Inc.,
  •  Dice Holdings, Inc.,
  •  Google Inc.,
  •  IAC/InterActive Corp.,
  •  Internet Brands, Inc.,
  •  The Knot, Inc.,
  •  Monster Worldwide, Inc., and
  •  Yahoo! Inc.
 
For each of the selected companies, Raymond James analyzed the multiples of enterprise value (calculated as the sum of the value of common equity on a fully diluted basis and the value of net debt) divided by (i) estimated revenue and (ii) estimated earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA, for the actual calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and projected years ending


67


Table of Contents

December 31, 2009 and 2010. Raymond James reviewed the mean, median, low, and high relative valuation multiples of the selected companies and compared them to corresponding trading multiples for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the selected public company analysis are summarized below:
 
                                         
Multiple
  WebMD     Mean     Median     Low     High  
 
Enterprise Value/Revenue:
                                       
CY2008
    3.5 x     2.3 x     2.3 x     0.4 x     5.2 x
CY2009
    3.2 x     2.6 x     2.6 x     0.5 x     5.2 x
CY2010
    2.8 x     2.5 x     2.2 x     0.4 x     4.6 x
Enterprise Value/EBITDA:
                                       
CY2008
    15.1 x     9.3 x     8.8 x     4.4 x     14.0 x
CY2009
    11.9 x     10.0 x     9.5 x     5.2 x     15.2 x
CY2010
    9.8 x     8.5 x     9.5 x     3.6 x     11.2 x
 
Raymond James then applied the mean and median multiples to the relevant WebMD revenue and EBITDA metrics to determine a range of implied WebMD enterprise values. After adjusting for WebMD’s capitalization, Raymond James reviewed the range of per share prices derived in the selected public companies analysis and compared them to the closing price per share for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the selected public companies analysis are summarized below:
 
                 
    Equity Value per share based on  
    Revenue     EBITDA  
 
Mean
  $ 23.83     $ 23.60  
Median
  $ 23.19     $ 23.83  
WebMD (June 17, 2009)
  $ 28.21     $ 28.21  
 
Selected Transaction Analysis
 
Raymond James derived a range of potential values for WebMD relative to select mergers and acquisitions involving companies that Raymond James believed to have similar business models, in whole or in part, to that of WebMD. The selected transactions considered since February 2005 included:
 
  •  CBS Corporation’s acquisition of CNet Networks Inc., announced in May 2008;
 
  •  The Bankrate, Inc. acquisition of InsureMe, Inc., announced in February 2008;
 
  •  The Liberty Media Corp. acquisition of IAC/InterActive Corp., announced in January 2008;
 
  •  The Tech Target, Inc. acquisition of KnowledgeStorm, Inc., announced in November 2007;
 
  •  The R.H. Donnelley Corp. acquisition of Business.com, Inc., announced in July 2007; and
 
  •  The ValueClick Inc. acquisition of MezMedia, Inc., announced in July 2007.
 
  •  The Knot, Inc. acquisition of WeddingChannel.com, Inc., announced in June 2006
 
  •  NBC Universal, Inc. acquisition of iVillage Inc., announced in March 2006
 
  •  Google Inc. acquisition of AOL LLC (5% stake), announced in December 2005
 
  •  PRIMEDIA Inc. acquisition of Automotive.com, Inc., announced in November 2005
 
  •  News Corp. acquisition of IGN Entertainment, Inc., announced in September 2005
 
  •  News Corp. acquisition of Intermix Media Inc., announced in July 2005
 
  •  IAC/Interactive Corp. acquisition of Ask Jeeves Inc., announced in March 2005
 
  •  The New York Times Company acquisition of About.com, Inc., announced in February 2005
 


68


Table of Contents

Raymond James examined valuation multiples of transaction enterprise value compared to the revenue and EBITDA of the target companies, in each case for the reported twelve month period prior to announcement of the transaction, where such information was publicly available. Raymond James reviewed the mean, median, low, and high relative valuation multiples of the selected transactions and compared them to corresponding trading multiples for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the selected transactions analysis are summarized below:
 
                 
    Enterprise Value to Trailing Twelve Months  
    Revenue     EBITDA  
 
Mean
    5.6 x     20.3 x
Median
    5.1 x     18.5 x
Low
    0.9 x     8.4 x
High
    13.0 x     35.0 x
 
Raymond James then applied the mean and median multiples to the relevant WebMD revenue and EBITDA metrics to determine a range of implied WebMD enterprise values. After adjusting for WebMD’s capitalization, Raymond James reviewed the range of per share prices derived in the selected transactions analysis and compared them to the closing price per share for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the selected transactions analysis are summarized below:
 
         
    Equity
 
    Value
 
    per Share  
 
Mean
  $ 38.82  
Median
  $ 36.13  
WebMD (June 17, 2009)
  $ 28.21  
 
In its oral presentation to the HLTH Board, Raymond James highlighted those transactions that have closed since July 2007. The results of the selected transactions analysis for that period are summarized below:
 
                 
    Enterprise Value to Trailing
 
    Twelve Months  
    Revenue     EBITDA  
 
Mean
    4.2 x     16.9 x
Median
    4.6 x     17.9 x
Low
    0.9 x     8.4 x
High
    6.9 x     23.6 x
 
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
 
Raymond James analyzed the discounted present value of WebMD’s projected free cash flows for the six months ending December 31, 2009 and for the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2014. Raymond James used unleveraged free cash flows, defined as earnings before interest, plus depreciation, plus amortization, less capital expenditures, less cash taxes for operations, less change in net working capital.
 
The discounted cash flow analysis was prepared using published research analyst projections of the financial performance of WebMD. Raymond James used calendar year 2014 as the final year for the analysis and applied transaction multiples, ranging from 8.0x to 12.0x, to calendar CY2014 EBITDA in order to derive a range of terminal values for the Company in 2014.
 
The projected unlevered free cash flows and terminal values were discounted using rates ranging from 10.0% to 14.0%, which reflected the average cost of capital for WebMD. The resulting range of present enterprise values was adjusted by the Company’s current capitalization and divided by the number of diluted shares outstanding in order to arrive at a range of present values per WebMD share. Raymond James reviewed the range of per share prices produced in the discounted cash flow analysis and compared them to the closing


69


Table of Contents

price per share for WebMD on June 17, 2009. The results of the discounted cash flow analysis are summarized below:
 
         
    Equity
 
    Value
 
    per Share  
 
Low
  $ 26.13  
High
  $ 37.85  
WebMD (June 17, 2009)
  $ 28.21  
 
Additional Considerations
 
The foregoing summary describes all analyses and quantitative factors that Raymond James deemed material in its presentation to the HLTH Board of Directors but is not a comprehensive description of all analyses performed and factors considered by Raymond James in connection with preparing its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving the application of subjective business judgment in determining the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, is not readily susceptible to summary description. In arriving at its fairness determination, Raymond James did not assign specific weights to any particular analyses.
 
The analyses conducted by Raymond James were prepared solely for the purpose of enabling Raymond James to provide its opinion to the HLTH Board of Directors as to the fairness of the exchange ratio, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of HLTH. The analyses are not appraisals nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which assets or securities actually may be sold. In performing its analyses, Raymond James made, and was provided by HLTH’s management with, numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, and regulatory conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of HLTH. The analyses performed by Raymond James, particularly those based on forecasts, are not necessarily indicative of actual values, trading values, or actual future results which might be achieved, all of which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses at the time of the opinion delivery. Because such analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of HLTH or its advisors, none of HLTH, Raymond James or any other person assumes responsibility if future results or actual values are materially different from these forecasts or assumptions. All such analyses were prepared solely as a part of Raymond James’s analysis of the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to the stockholders of HLTH. The opinion of Raymond James was one of many factors taken into consideration by the HLTH Board of Directors in making its determination to approve the merger. Consequently, the analyses described above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the HLTH Board of Directors or management with respect to the value of HLTH. HLTH placed no limits of the scope of the analysis performed, or opinion expressed, by Raymond James. The HLTH Board of Directors selected Raymond James as financial advisor in connection with the merger based on Raymond James’s qualifications, expertise, reputation, and experience in mergers and acquisitions. For services rendered in connection with the delivery of its opinion, HLTH paid Raymond James a fee of $100,000 upon delivery of its opinion. HLTH will also pay Raymond James a customary fee for advisory services in the amount of $1,000,000 in connection with, and contingent upon consummation of, the merger. HLTH also agreed to reimburse Raymond James for expenses incurred in connection with its services, including the fees and expenses of its counsel, and will indemnify Raymond James, including for liabilities under federal securities laws, relating to, or arising out of, its engagement.
 
Raymond James is actively involved in the investment banking business and regularly undertakes the valuation of investment securities in connection with public offerings, private placements, business combinations, and similar transactions. In the ordinary course of business, Raymond James may trade in the securities of HLTH for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
 
Raymond James was retained by the HLTH Board of Directors, pursuant to the engagement letter described above, in connection with the proposed merger that was entered into on February 20, 2008 and later terminated on October 19, 2008, for which it received a retainer fee of $50,000 and a fee of $500,000 for rendering its opinion with respect to certain financial aspects of such proposed merger. Other than the


70


Table of Contents

engagement of Raymond James by the HLTH Board of Directors described in this section, there are no existing or contemplated material relationships or arrangements for future services, nor have any such relationships or arrangements existed or been contemplated during the past two years, involving or resulting in the payment or receipt of compensation between Raymond James and any party to the transaction.
 
Opinion of Financial Advisor to the WebMD Special Committee, Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc.
 
In connection with its review and analysis of the merger, the WebMD Special Committee engaged Morgan Joseph to advise the WebMD Special Committee and to furnish a written opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the WebMD stockholders (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of WebMD and HLTH and their respective affiliates) of the consideration to be paid by WebMD in the merger to holders of HLTH Common Stock. The WebMD Special Committee selected Morgan Joseph as its financial advisor because, among other reasons, Morgan Joseph has experience in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions.
 
At a meeting of the WebMD Special Committee on June 17, 2009, Morgan Joseph furnished to the WebMD Special Committee its opinion (which we refer to as the Morgan Joseph Opinion) that, as of such date, and based upon the assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of its review as set forth in its written opinion, the consideration to be paid by WebMD in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the WebMD stockholders (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of WebMD and HLTH and their respective affiliates).
 
Morgan Joseph has consented to the inclusion of its written opinion and the summary of the opinion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The description of the Morgan Joseph Opinion set forth in this section is qualified by reference to the full text of the Morgan Joseph Opinion set forth in Annex F. You are urged to read the Morgan Joseph Opinion in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the Morgan Joseph Opinion and the review and analyses undertaken by Morgan Joseph in furnishing to the WebMD Special Committee the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
 
The Morgan Joseph Opinion is addressed and was furnished solely to the WebMD Special Committee and addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the WebMD stockholders (other than HLTH and the officers and directors of WebMD and HLTH and their respective affiliates), from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid by WebMD in the merger. It does not address the merits of the underlying business decision by WebMD, the WebMD Special Committee or the WebMD Board of Directors to propose, consider, approve, recommend, declare advisable or consummate the merger, and does not constitute a recommendation to WebMD, the WebMD Special Committee, the WebMD Board of Directors, the WebMD stockholders, or any other WebMD constituent, person or entity as to how such person should vote or as to any other specific action that should be taken in connection with the transaction.
 
In connection with furnishing the Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan Joseph reviewed and analyzed, among other things, the following:
 
  •  the June 11, 2009 draft of the merger agreement which WebMD represented to Morgan Joseph was, with respect to all of the material terms and conditions thereof, substantially in the form of the definitive agreement executed and delivered by the parties thereto promptly after the receipt of the Morgan Joseph Opinion;
 
  •  the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by WebMD with the SEC for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by WebMD with the SEC for its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, and certain other Exchange Act filings made by WebMD with the SEC;
 
  •  the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by HLTH with the SEC for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by HLTH with the SEC for its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, and certain other Exchange Act filings made by HLTH with the SEC;


71


Table of Contents

 
  •  certain other publicly available business and financial information concerning HLTH and its subsidiaries, including WebMD, and the industries in which they operate, which Morgan Joseph believed to be relevant to their analyses;
 
  •  with respect to the valuation of the net operating losses of HLTH, certain information prepared internally by HLTH;
 
  •  with respect to HLTH and its subsidiaries other than WebMD, certain information prepared internally by HLTH and other data relating to their respective businesses and prospects, including certain budgets, forecasts and presentations prepared by HLTH and WebMD, which were provided to Morgan Joseph by HLTH’s senior management;
 
  •  with respect to WebMD, certain information prepared internally by WebMD and certain other data relating to its business and prospects, including certain budgets and presentations prepared by WebMD, which were provided to Morgan Joseph by WebMD’s senior management;
 
  •  the reported prices and trading activity of WebMD Class A Common Stock and HLTH Common Stock;
 
  •  certain publicly available information concerning certain other companies which Morgan Joseph believed to be relevant and the trading markets for certain of such other companies’ securities; and
 
  •  the financial terms of certain recent business combinations which Morgan Joseph believes to be relevant.
 
Morgan Joseph also had discussions with various officers and employees of WebMD and HLTH concerning the transaction and their businesses, operations, assets, present condition and prospects and undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as Morgan Joseph deemed relevant.
 
In performing its analyses, numerous assumptions, including the assumptions described below, were made with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Morgan Joseph, the WebMD Special Committee, WebMD and HLTH. Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by Morgan Joseph are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by such analyses. Additionally, estimates of the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which those businesses or securities might actually be sold. Accordingly, the analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
 
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Joseph, with the WebMD Special Committee’s permission, assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information and data, including financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data, provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with it, and upon the assurances of the senior managements of HLTH and WebMD that all information relevant to its opinion had been disclosed and made available to it and did not attempt independently to verify such information, nor did it assume any responsibility to do so. Morgan Joseph further relied upon the assurances of the senior managements of HLTH and WebMD that they were not aware of any facts that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. Morgan Joseph utilized the financial projections and forecasts with respect to Porex in assessing the potential value for Porex in the analyses described below with respect to HLTH. Without limiting the foregoing, Morgan Joseph relied upon, without independent verification, the information provided to it by WebMD with respect to WebMD’s cash balances, including the value of auction rate securities included in WebMD’s cash balances and any impairment to the value thereto and the information provided to it by HLTH with respect to HLTH’s cash balances, including the value of auction rate securities included in HLTH’s cash balances and any impairment to the value thereto. With respect to Porex, Morgan Joseph further assumed, with the WebMD Special Committee’s permission, that HLTH’s forecasts and projections provided to and reviewed by it had been reasonably prepared in good faith based upon the best current estimates, information and judgment of the respective HLTH subsidiaries’ managements as to the future financial condition, cash flows and results of operations of HLTH and its consolidated subsidiaries other than WebMD. In that regard, Morgan Joseph assumed, with the WebMD Special Committee’s permission, that


72


Table of Contents

all of WebMD’s material assets and liabilities (contingent or otherwise) were as set forth in financial statements or other information made available to Morgan Joseph.
 
Morgan Joseph made no independent investigation of any legal, accounting or tax matters affecting WebMD or HLTH, and assumed the correctness of all legal, accounting and tax advice given to WebMD and its Board of Directors and the WebMD Special Committee. In particular, Morgan Joseph was instructed to assume that none of the NOL carryforwards of WebMD will be utilized by HLTH pursuant to the tax sharing agreement between WebMD and HLTH prior to the consummation of the transaction and that such net operating losses will be utilized pursuant to the estimates of WebMD’s taxable income as projected in the analyst’s model. Furthermore, Morgan Joseph was instructed to utilize an estimate of $19.0 million for the net costs related to HLTH’s Department of Justice investigation, irrespective of any differing amount set forth in any pro forma balance sheet prepared by WebMD. Morgan Joseph further assumed that the transaction would be consummated on the terms described in the drafts of the merger agreement, without any waiver, delay, amendment or modification of any material terms or conditions.
 
Morgan Joseph did not conduct a physical inspection of the properties and facilities of WebMD or HLTH, nor did it make or obtain any independent evaluation or appraisal of such properties and facilities. Morgan Joseph also took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions and its experience in similar transactions, as well as its experience in securities valuation in general. Morgan Joseph’s opinion necessarily is based upon economic, financial, political, regulatory and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on the date of the Morgan Joseph Opinion and Morgan Joseph assumed no responsibility to update or revise its opinion based upon events or circumstances occurring after such date. Morgan Joseph did not express any opinion as to what the market reaction might be to the proposed transaction or how WebMD Common Stock might trade after the announcement of the transaction.
 
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Joseph was not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to an acquisition, business combination or other transaction involving WebMD or its assets. Morgan Joseph also expressed no opinion about the fairness of the amount or nature of the compensation to any of WebMD’s or HLTH’s officers, directors or employees, or class of such persons, relative to the compensation to the public stockholders of WebMD.
 
In connection with furnishing to the WebMD Special Committee the Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan Joseph performed a variety of financial analyses, which are summarized below. These analyses were presented to the WebMD Special Committee at a meeting held on June 17, 2009. The summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Morgan Joseph in this regard. Certain of the summaries of financial analyses include information set forth in tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses used by Morgan Joseph, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The preparation of an opinion regarding financial fairness involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analyses and the application of these methods to the particular circumstances, and, therefore, such an opinion is not readily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Accordingly, notwithstanding the separate analyses summarized below, Morgan Joseph believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors considered by it, without considering all of its analyses and factors, or attempting to ascribe relative weights to some or all of its analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
 
Morgan Joseph was specifically informed by management of WebMD and HLTH that the financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data regarding their respective companies were based upon numerous variables and assumptions. These variables and assumptions are inherently uncertain, including, without limitation, factors related to general market, industry, economic and competitive conditions. Accordingly, Morgan Joseph was informed that actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in such financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data.
 
No company or transaction used in the analyses described below is identical to WebMD, HLTH or the proposed merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results thereof necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could


73


Table of Contents

affect the proposed merger or the public trading or other values of WebMD, HLTH or companies to which they are being compared. Mathematical analysis (such as determining an average or median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using selected acquisition or company data. In addition, in performing such analyses, Morgan Joseph relied upon, with the WebMD Special Committee’s permission and without any independent verification, projections prepared by research analysts at established securities firms, any of which may or may not prove to be accurate.
 
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Joseph did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it. Each analysis was ultimately qualitative in nature given that the comparisons with other transactions or metrics did not lend themselves to mathematical “weights” contributing to a total which translated into a determination of fairness. These analyses and other factors were then evaluated together as a whole, reflecting qualitative judgments regarding the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor, which together informed the ultimate conclusions of Morgan Joseph, but no single analysis was determinative in rendering a conclusion regarding the fairness of the consideration to be paid in the proposed transaction. Accordingly, Morgan Joseph believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, without considering all analyses, would create an incomplete view of the process underlying its opinion.
 
The following is a summary of the material analyses performed by Morgan Joseph in connection with the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
 
Analyses With Respect to the Merger
 
Morgan Joseph conducted analyses with respect to the value of HLTH which were based upon the estimated component values of the various businesses and other assets that are owned by HLTH. These included: (i) approximately 48.1 million shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock; (ii) 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Porex; (iii) approximately $314.3 million in cash on hand and auction rate securities with a value of $146.9 million; and (iv) the value of NOL carryforwards which could be utilized by WebMD following the merger. Morgan Joseph also considered the principal factors that reduced the value of HLTH, which included: (i) the estimated value of HLTH’s obligations with respect to its convertible notes and associated tax liabilities; (ii) the estimated net costs related to the Department of Justice investigation; (iii) the estimated liabilities associated with the taxes and transaction fees and expenses that would be due upon the disposal of Porex; (iv) potential additional reductions in the value of the auction rate securities held by HLTH, calculated by reference to their loanable value; and (v) HLTH’s severance costs and transaction fees and expenses associated with the transaction. Morgan Joseph assumed, with the WebMD Special Committee’s permission, that all issued and outstanding HLTH stock options, whether exercisable or not, would convert into WebMD stock options at the effective time of the merger.
 
Analyses with Respect to Ownership of WebMD Common Stock
 
The most significant component of the value owned by HLTH is its ownership of approximately 48.1 million shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock. Based upon the analyses of the value of WebMD above, Morgan Joseph estimated the value of HLTH’s ownership of WebMD Class B Common Stock based upon WebMD’s trading price as of the close of business on June 17, 2009. No control premium was attributed to the value of HLTH’s ownership of WebMD Class B Common Stock in Morgan Joseph’s analysis. The resulting value of HLTH’s ownership of WebMD was between $12.54 and $12.55 per share of HLTH Common Stock depending upon the level of dilution from option exercises assumed.
 
With respect to Porex, Morgan Joseph conducted separate valuation analyses on the company, as summarized below. Net of estimated taxes and transaction fees and expenses, Morgan Joseph’s analysis indicated Porex had a value of between $91.2 million and $131.7 million, or between $0.84 and $1.22 per share of HLTH Common Stock. In combination with the other valuation factors described above, Morgan Joseph’s analysis indicated HLTH’s equity value was between $1.368 billion and $1.376 billion, or between $12.65 and $12.72 per share of HLTH Common Stock.


74


Table of Contents

Analyses with Respect to Porex
 
Morgan Joseph prepared a series of analyses with respect to the value of Porex. Porex’s business is composed of two groups, the Porous Products Group and the Surgical Products Group. Because these groups exhibit different business and financial characteristics, and are comparable to different companies, Morgan Joseph analyzed separately the value of each of these groups. Morgan Joseph’s analysis indicated a range of values for Porex as a whole of approximately $100.0 million to $145.0 million.
 
Analyses with Respect to Porex — Porous Products Group
 
Selected Companies Analysis
 
Using publicly available company SEC filings, research analyst estimates and other publicly available information, Morgan Joseph analyzed, among other things, the implied value of the Porous Products Group based upon corresponding trading multiples of selected companies that Morgan Joseph believed were generally comparable to the Porous Products Group. These selected companies are set forth below.
 
  •  Millipore Corporation
  •  Pentair, Inc.
  •  Pall Corporation
  •  Donaldson Company, Inc.
  •  Bemis Company, Inc.
  •  CLARCOR Inc.
  •  Polypore International, Inc.
  •  Sartorius Group
  •  Filtrona plc
  •  Rogers Corporation
  •  Porvair plc
 
In its analysis, Morgan Joseph derived a range of trading multiples for the selected companies, including, but not limited to, enterprise value as a multiple of projected EBITDA, calculated as follows:
 
  •  Enterprise Value, which Morgan Joseph defined as market capitalization plus the par value of total debt including out-of-the-money convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an as converted basis, if applicable) minus cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, divided by EBITDA, which excludes one-time charges and includes stock-based compensation.
 
Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable to the Porous Products Group in all respects, they were chosen because they have operations, lines of business and/or product segments that for purposes of analysis may be considered similar to certain of the Porous Products Group’s operations, lines of business and/or product segments.
 
The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph included trading multiples exhibited by the selected companies with respect to their 2009 projected financial performance. All trading multiples for the selected companies were based upon closing stock prices as of June 17, 2009. The table below provides a summary of these trading multiples:
 
Trading Multiples Observed from the Selected Companies
 
                 
   
Mean
 
Median
 
High
 
Low
 
Enterprise Value/2009 Projected EBITDA
  9.0x   8.8x   12.7x   4.4x
 
Selected Comparable Transactions Analysis
 
Using publicly available information, Morgan Joseph analyzed, among other things, the implied enterprise value of the Porous Products Group, based upon corresponding transaction purchase price multiples paid in selected precedent merger and acquisition transactions that it deemed relevant in reviewing the financial terms


75


Table of Contents

of the proposed merger, which are presented in the table below in reverse chronological order based upon the date of announcement:
 
         
Date Announced
 
Target Company
 
Acquiror Company
 
October 16, 2008
  Western Filter Corporation   Donaldson Company Inc.
February 4, 2008
  Whatman plc   General Electric Company (GE Healthcare)
October 17, 2007
  Perry Equipment Corporation   CLARCOR Inc.
March 6, 2007
  Porous Media Corporation   Pentair Inc.
August 2, 2005
  domnick hunter group plc   Parker Hannifin Corporation
May 12, 2005
  CUNO Incorporated   3M Company
June 1, 2004
  BHA Group Holdings, Inc.   General Electric Company
March 17, 2004
  Apogent Technologies Inc.   Fisher Scientific International Inc.
February 3, 2004
  Polypore, Inc.   Warburg Pincus LLC
February 2, 2004
  Waterlink (UK) Limited   Calgon Carbon Corp
November 18, 2003
  Everpure, Inc.   Pentair, Inc.
March 6, 2002
  Filtrations & Separations Group   Pall Corp.
 
Morgan Joseph selected these transactions, among other reasons, because the targets involved in such transactions operate in similar industries and have similar lines of business to the Porous Products Group. However, none of the target companies is identical or directly comparable to the Porous Products Group, and no transaction involving the Porous Products Group has been proposed. For each precedent transaction, Morgan Joseph determined the transaction value (which is defined as the purchase price of the equity plus the par value of total debt including out-of-the-money convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an as converted basis, if applicable) less cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities) as a multiple of the target company’s EBITDA, which excludes one-time charges and includes stock-based compensation, for the LTM period. The table below provides a summary of these transaction purchase price multiples:
 
Purchase Price Multiples Observed from the Selected Transactions
 
                 
    Mean   Median   High   Low
 
Transaction Value/LTM EBITDA
  11.7x   11.4x   20.5x   6.7x
 
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
 
Using HLTH’s projected financial information for the Porous Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, Morgan Joseph calculated the net present value of free cash flows of the Porous Products Group using discount rates ranging from 12.2% to 14.2%. Morgan Joseph’s estimate of the appropriate range of discount rates was based upon the estimated cost of capital for the selected companies used in the selected publicly traded companies analysis. Morgan Joseph also estimated a range of terminal values for the Porous Products Group based upon multiples of EBITDA in fiscal year 2013 that ranged from 5.0x to 7.0x and discounted these terminal values using the assumed range of discount rates. Morgan Joseph’s estimate of the appropriate range of terminal multiples was based upon the multiples from the selected companies and the selected transactions used in the selected comparable transactions analysis. The present values of the implied terminal values of the Porous Products Group were then added to the present value of the after-tax free cash flows to arrive at a range of enterprise values.
 
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
 
Based upon HLTH’s projected financial information for the Porous Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, Morgan Joseph performed a leveraged buyout analysis to determine the potential implied enterprise value that might be achieved in an acquisition of Porous Products Group in a leveraged buyout


76


Table of Contents

transaction assuming an exit from the business in fiscal year 2013. Estimated exit values were calculated by applying a range of multiples from 5.0x to 7.0x EBITDA in fiscal year 2013, the same terminal value multiples used in the discounted cash flow analysis. Morgan Joseph then derived a range of theoretical purchase prices based upon a range of assumed required internal rates of return on equity for a buyer of approximately 27.0% to 33.0%, which range was assumed to be generally reflective of the range of required internal rates of return on equity commonly assumed when performing a leveraged buyout analysis of this type.
 
Analyses with Respect to Porex — Surgical Products Group
 
Selected Companies Analysis
 
Using publicly available company SEC filings, research analyst estimates and other publicly available information, Morgan Joseph analyzed, among other things, the implied value of the Surgical Products Group based upon corresponding trading multiples of selected companies that Morgan Joseph believed were generally comparable to the Surgical Products Group. These selected companies are set forth below.
 
  •  Stryker Corporation
  •  Synthes, Inc.
  •  Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
  •  Smith & Nephew plc
  •  Orthofix International N.V.
  •  Wright Medical Group, Inc.
  •  Symmetry Medical Inc.
  •  Kensey Nash Corporation
  •  Exactech, Inc.
 
In its analysis, Morgan Joseph derived a range of trading multiples for the selected companies, including, but not limited to, enterprise value as a multiple of projected EBITDA, calculated as follows:
 
  •  Enterprise Value, which Morgan Joseph defined as market capitalization plus the par value of total debt including out-of-the-money convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an as converted basis, if applicable) minus cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, divided by EBITDA, which excludes one-time charges and includes stock-based compensation.
 
Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable to the Surgical Products Group in all respects, they were chosen because they have operations, lines of business and/or product segments that for purposes of analysis may be considered similar to certain of the Surgical Products Group’s operations, lines of business and/or product segments.
 
The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph included trading multiples exhibited by the selected companies with respect to their 2009 projected financial performance. All trading multiples for the selected companies were based upon closing stock prices as of June 17, 2009. The table below provides a summary of these trading multiples:
 
Trading Multiples Observed from the Selected Companies
 
                                 
    Mean     Median     High     Low  
 
Enterprise Value/2009 Projected EBITDA
    7.3x       7.1x       8.6x       6.3x  
 
Selected Comparable Transactions Analysis
 
Using publicly available information, Morgan Joseph analyzed, among other things, the implied enterprise value of the Porous Products Group, based upon corresponding transaction purchase price multiples paid in selected precedent merger and acquisition transactions that it deemed relevant in reviewing the financial terms


77


Table of Contents

of the proposed merger, which are presented in the table below in reverse chronological order based upon the date of announcement:
 
         
Date Announced
 
Target Company
 
Acquiror Company
 
December 1, 2008
  Mentor Corporation   ETHICON, INC.
January 15, 2008
  Lifecore Biomedical, Inc.   Warburg Pincus LLC
July 16, 2007
  DJO Incorporated   ReABLE Therapeutics, Inc.
March 12, 2007
  Plus Orthopedics AG   Smith & Nephew plc
November 14, 2006
  Newdeal Technologies, SA   Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation
February 27, 2006
  Aircast Incorporated   dj Orthopedics LLC
August 9, 2004
  Empi, Inc.   Encore Medical Corporation
April 28, 2004
  MedSource Technologies Inc.   Accellent, Inc. (Medical Device
Manufacturing, Inc.)
 
Morgan Joseph selected these transactions, among other reasons, because the targets involved in such transactions operate in similar industries and have similar lines of business to the Surgical Products Group. However, none of the target companies is identical or directly comparable to the Surgical Products Group, and no transaction involving the Surgical Products Group has been proposed. For each precedent transaction, Morgan Joseph determined the transaction value (which is defined as the purchase price of the equity plus the par value of total debt including out-of-the-money convertible debt, capitalized leases and preferred stock (on an as converted basis, if applicable) less cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities) as a multiple of the target company’s EBITDA, which excludes one-time charges and includes stock-based compensation, for the LTM period. The table below provides a summary of these transaction purchase price multiples:
 
Purchase Price Multiples Observed from the Selected Transactions
 
                                 
    Mean     Median     High     Low  
 
Transaction Value/LTM EBITDA
    12.8x       14.0x       15.7x       7.3x  
 
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
 
Using HLTH’s projected financial information for the Surgical Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, Morgan Joseph calculated the net present value of free cash flows of the Surgical Products Group using discount rates ranging from 14.0% to 16.0%. Morgan Joseph’s estimate of the appropriate range of discount rates was based on the estimated cost of capital for the selected companies used in the selected publicly traded companies analysis. Morgan Joseph also estimated a range of terminal values for the Surgical Products Group based upon EBITDA in fiscal year 2013 that ranged from 6.0x to 8.0x and discounted these terminal values using the assumed range of discount rates. Morgan Joseph’s estimate of the appropriate range of terminal multiples was based upon the multiples of the selected companies and the selected transactions used in the selected comparable transactions analysis. The present values of the implied terminal values of the Surgical Products Group were then added to the present value of the after-tax free cash flows to arrive at a range of enterprise values.
 
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
 
Based upon HLTH’s projected financial information for the Surgical Products Group for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, Morgan Joseph performed a leveraged buyout analysis to determine the potential implied enterprise value that might be achieved in an acquisition of Surgical Products Group in a leveraged buyout transaction assuming an exit from the business in fiscal year 2013. Estimated exit values were calculated by applying a range of multiples from 6.0x to 8.0x EBITDA in fiscal year 2013, the same terminal value multiples used in the discounted cash flow analysis. Morgan Joseph then derived a range of theoretical purchase prices based upon a range of assumed required internal rates of return on equity for a buyer of approximately 27.0% to


78


Table of Contents

33.0%, which range was assumed to be generally reflective of the range of required internal rates of return on equity commonly assumed when performing a leveraged buyout analysis of this type.
 
Miscellaneous
 
WebMD and Morgan Joseph entered into a letter agreement dated June 1, 2009 relating to the services to be provided by Morgan Joseph in connection with the proposed merger. WebMD agreed to pay Morgan Joseph a customary engagement fee in the amount of $100,000 and a fee in the amount of $850,000 upon delivery of its opinion. The fees were not contingent upon either the conclusion of its opinion or the consummation of the transaction. WebMD also agreed to reimburse Morgan Joseph for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement, including certain fees and disbursements of its legal counsel, and to indemnify Morgan Joseph against liabilities relating to or arising out of its engagement, including liabilities under the securities laws. The opinion was approved and issued by Morgan Joseph’s opinion committee. In the ordinary course of its business, Morgan Joseph may acquire, hold or sell, long or short positions, or trade or otherwise effect transactions in equity and other securities and financial instruments (including loans and other obligations) of, or investments in, WebMD and HLTH. Within the past two years, Morgan Joseph acted as financial advisor to the WebMD Special Committee in connection with the Proposed 2008 Merger and, in connection therewith, received fees of $2,000,000 in the aggregate for such services. Other than these engagements, Morgan Joseph has not acted as a financial advisor to any party involved in the transaction within the past three years. In addition, there are no other existing material relationships involving the payment or receipt of compensation between Morgan Joseph and any party to the transaction during the last two years. Morgan Joseph may in the future seek to provide investment banking services to WebMD, HLTH, or any of their affiliates, and receive customary fees for such services.
 
Certain Effects of the Merger
 
Conversion of Outstanding HLTH Common Stock
 
Upon the merger agreement being adopted by the HLTH stockholders and the WebMD stockholders in accordance with the merger agreement and the General Corporation Law, and the other conditions to the closing of the merger being satisfied or waived, HLTH will be merged with and into WebMD, with WebMD continuing as the surviving corporation. Following the merger, the current HLTH stockholders and WebMD stockholders will directly own all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of WebMD. See “The Merger Agreement” for a complete description of the merger agreement.
 
Effect on Ownership Structure of WebMD
 
At the effective time of the merger, HLTH’s current stockholders will have ownership interests in WebMD and rights as WebMD stockholders. Therefore, HLTH’s current stockholders will participate alongside the current WebMD stockholders in any earnings or growth of WebMD following the merger and will benefit from any increase in the value of WebMD following the merger. For information regarding the interests in WebMD’s net book value and net income by HLTH and the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock immediately before the merger and by HLTH stockholders and the holders of WebMD Class A Common Stock immediately following the merger, see “Interests in Net Income and Net Book Value of WebMD.”
 
Upon the filing of the certificate of merger, the WebMD certificate of incorporation will be amended, which we refer to, as amended, as the Amended WebMD Charter, to eliminate the dual class structure of Common Stock at WebMD, and all WebMD stockholders following the merger will own the same class of Common Stock. Pursuant to the merger agreement, each share of Class B Common Stock of WebMD issued and outstanding or held in treasury immediately prior to the completion of the merger will be cancelled.


79


Table of Contents

Effect on Listing, Registration and Status of HLTH Common Stock
 
HLTH’s Common Stock is currently registered under the Exchange Act and is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “HLTH.” As a result of the merger, the separate corporate existence of HLTH will cease. After the merger, HLTH’s Common Stock will cease to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, and price quotations with respect to sales of shares of HLTH’s Common Stock in the public market will no longer be available. In addition, registration of the Common Stock of HLTH under the Exchange Act will be terminated, and HLTH’s obligation to file reports under the Exchange Act will be suspended.
 
Effect on Organization and Management of WebMD
 
At the effective time of the merger, the directors of both WebMD and HLTH will become the directors of the surviving corporation in the merger and the WebMD board will accordingly be increased to 12 members. It is expected that, immediately following the effective time of the merger, the officers of WebMD immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will remain officers of the surviving corporation and will generally have the same positions they held at WebMD. The certificate of incorporation of WebMD as amended upon the filing of the certificate of merger will, from and after the effective time of the merger, be the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation, until duly amended as provided therein or by applicable law. The amended and restated bylaws of WebMD, as in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, will, from and after the effective time of the merger, be the bylaws of the surviving corporation, until duly amended as provided therein or by applicable law.
 
It is expected that, upon consummation of the merger, the operations of WebMD will be conducted substantially as they currently are being conducted. Management of WebMD does not have any present plans or proposals that relate to, or would result in, an extraordinary corporate transaction following completion of the merger involving WebMD’s corporate structure, business or management, such as a merger, reorganization, liquidation, relocation of any operations or sale or transfer of a material amount of assets. It is expected, however, that following the merger, WebMD’s management will continuously evaluate and review WebMD’s business and operations and may develop new plans and proposals that they consider appropriate to maximize the value of WebMD. WebMD reserves the right to make any changes deemed appropriate in light of its evaluation and review or in light of future developments.
 
Plans for the Companies if the Merger is Not Completed
 
It is expected that, if the merger is not completed, the current management of HLTH, under the direction of the HLTH Board of Directors, will continue to manage HLTH as a separate company, and the current management of WebMD, under the direction of the WebMD board, will continue to manage WebMD as an ongoing business that will continue to be controlled by HLTH. From time to time, it is expected that each of HLTH and WebMD will evaluate and review its respective business operations, properties, dividend policy and capitalization, among other things, make such changes as are deemed appropriate and continue to seek to identify strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value. If the merger is not consummated for any reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction acceptable to HLTH or WebMD will be offered or that their respective businesses and operations will not be adversely affected. As discussed herein, HLTH currently is in the process of pursuing the sale of its Porex business. If the proposed sale is successful and the merger is not completed, the only operating business of HLTH will be WebMD. HLTH may seek to acquire other businesses using cash or securities as consideration from time to time.
 
Approval of the Merger
 
WebMD Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement and Approve the Merger
 
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of WebMD Common Stock entitled to vote thereon at the WebMD Annual Meeting is required to adopt the


80


Table of Contents

merger agreement and approve the merger. In the merger agreement, HLTH has agreed to vote all of the shares of WebMD Class B Common Stock that it holds in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the merger. Since HLTH controls approximately 96% of the voting power of the outstanding WebMD Common Stock, it can cause the merger to be approved by WebMD stockholders without the vote of any other stockholder.
 
HLTH Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement and Approve the Merger
 
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of HLTH Common Stock entitled to vote thereon at the HLTH Annual Meeting is required to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger.
 
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
 
In considering the recommendation of the Board of Directors, you should be aware that certain of HLTH’s and WebMD’s executive officers and directors may have interests in the transaction that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of HLTH’s and the unaffiliated WebMD stockholders generally. The WebMD Special Committee, WebMD Board of Directors and HLTH Board of Directors were aware of these potential or actual conflicts of interest and considered them along with other matters when they determined to recommend the merger. See “— Background of the Merger.”
 
HLTH Directors
 
Certain members of the HLTH Board of Directors are affiliated with WebMD and have actual or potential conflicts of interest in evaluating the merger. Each of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning is a director of WebMD; and Martin J. Wygod is a director, Chairman of the Board and an executive officer of WebMD. For additional information on these members of the Board of Directors, see “HLTH Directors and Executive Officers.”
 
WebMD Directors
 
Certain members of the WebMD Board of Directors are affiliated with HLTH and have conflicts of interest in evaluating the merger. Each of Mark J. Adler, M.D., Neil F. Dimick and James V. Manning is a director of HLTH; and Martin J. Wygod is a director, Chairman of the Board and an executive officer of HLTH. For additional information on these members of the Board of Directors, see “WebMD Directors and Executive Officers.”
 
HLTH Executive Officers
 
Certain executive officers of HLTH are affiliated with WebMD. Mark D. Funston is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HLTH and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WebMD; and Martin J. Wygod is Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH and Chairman of the Board of WebMD. For additional information on these executive officers, see “HLTH Directors and Executive Officers.”
 
WebMD Executive Officers
 
Certain executive officers of WebMD are affiliated with HLTH. Mark D. Funston is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HLTH and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WebMD; and Martin J. Wygod is Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH and Chairman of the Board of WebMD. Mr. Gattinella, Chief Executive Officer and President of WebMD, because of that position, is also deemed to be an executive officer of HLTH. For additional information on these executive officers, see “WebMD Directors and Executive Officers.”


81


Table of Contents

Employment with the Surviving Corporation Post-Merger
 
It is expected that, immediately following the effective time of the merger, the officers of WebMD immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be officers of the surviving corporation and will generally have the same positions they held at WebMD. Additionally, since WebMD’s initial public offering, it has relied on HLTH to provide it with certain services for its business pursuant to a services agreement it entered into with HLTH in September 2005. Certain of the HLTH executives that have provided WebMD with services under the service agreement will be employed by WebMD after the consummation of the merger.
 
The merger does not constitute a change in control under employment agreements with HLTH’s and WebMD’s executive officers. However, in connection with the merger, it is anticipated that Mr. Cameron and Mr. Mele, HLTH’s Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel, respectively, will undergo changes in title and position that may permit them to terminate employment with WebMD (as HLTH’s successor) for good reason if they choose to do so. See “— Employment Arrangements” below for additional information.
 
Martin J. Wygod currently serves as Chairman of the Board of both HLTH and WebMD, which are executive officer positions, and as acting Chief Executive Officer of HLTH. Mr. Wygod’s employment agreement had previously contemplated that he would serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of WebMD following the merger. However, as described below under “— Employment Agreements — Martin J. Wygod,” HLTH, WebMD and Mr. Wygod have agreed that he will serve as the Executive Chairman of the Board of WebMD following the merger pursuant to the terms of his amended employment contract.
 
Directors of the Surviving Corporation Post-Merger
 
The Board of Directors of both WebMD and HLTH at the effective time of the merger will, from and after the effective time of the merger, be the directors of the surviving corporation, until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of WebMD.
 
Treatment of Grants Under HLTH and WebMD Equity Plans
 
HLTH Stock Options.  Outstanding stock options of HLTH will be assumed by WebMD without any further action on the part of HLTH or the option holders; these assumed options will become options to acquire WebMD Common Stock. The number of shares of WebMD Common Stock underlying each converted stock option will be equal to (i) the number of shares of HLTH Common Stock underlying each HLTH stock option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by (ii) 0.4444. The exercise price per share of WebMD Common Stock with respect to each converted stock option will equal to the quotient of (x) the exercise price per share of the HLTH Common Stock subject to each HLTH stock option immediately before effective time of the merger divided by (y) 0.4444.


82


Table of Contents

The following directors and executive officers of HLTH and/or WebMD hold options to purchase the following number of shares of HLTH Common Stock that, if still outstanding at the closing of the merger, would be assumed by WebMD and converted into options to purchase WebMD Common Stock, as described above:
 
                 
Name
  Options Outstanding     Weighted Average Exercise Price  
 
Kevin M. Cameron
    4,002,168     $ 10.22 &n