-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 ------------------------ FORM 20-F (MARK ONE) [ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-15154 ALLIANZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) KONIGINSTRASSE 28, 80802 MUNICH, GERMANY (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) SECURITIES REGISTERED OR TO BE REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED ------------------- ----------------------------------------- ORDINARY SHARES (WITHOUT PAR VALUE)* THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. --------------- * Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. SECURITIES REGISTERED OR TO BE REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE SECURITIES FOR WHICH THERE IS A REPORTING OBLIGATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock at December 31, 2002: Ordinary shares, without par value...................... 266,565,625 shares Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ] Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 [ ] Item 18 [X] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE ---- ---- PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION............................. 1 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS................... 2 ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS....... 3 ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE..................... 3 ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION............................................. 3 Selected Consolidated Financial Data........................ 3 Dividends................................................... 4 Exchange Rate Information................................... 5 Risk Factors................................................ 7 ITEMS 4. - 5. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY AND OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS................ 18 Introduction................................................ 18 Strategy.................................................... 19 Summary Financial Information............................... 22 Recent Developments......................................... 24 Factors Affecting Results of Operations..................... 24 Critical Accounting Policies................................ 26 Accounting Differences...................................... 29 Consolidated Results of Operations.......................... 29 Consolidated Assets and Liabilities......................... 31 Investment Portfolio Impairments and Unrealized Losses...... 32 Unrealized Losses........................................... 34 Property-Casualty Insurance Operations...................... 37 Germany................................................... 43 Rest of Europe............................................ 50 NAFTA..................................................... 57 Rest of World............................................. 59 Specialty Lines............................................. 61 Life/Health Insurance Operations............................ 64 Germany................................................... 67 Rest of Europe............................................ 73 Rest of World............................................. 76 Banking Operations.......................................... 79 Asset Management Operations................................. 98 Liquidity and Capital Resources............................. 113 Consolidated Cash Flows..................................... 113 Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves........................ 116 Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations.................................................. 130 Regulation and Supervision.................................. 156 ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES.................. 177 Corporate Governance........................................ 177 Management Board............................................ 178 Supervisory Board........................................... 180 Compensation of Directors and Officers...................... 184 Board Practices............................................. 186 i ITEM PAGE ---- ---- Share Ownership............................................. 186 Employees................................................... 186 Options to Purchase Securities.............................. 187 ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS........... 188 Major Shareholders.......................................... 188 Related Party Transactions.................................. 189 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION....................................... 192 Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information..... 192 Legal Proceedings........................................... 192 Dividend Policy............................................. 195 Significant Changes......................................... 195 ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING....................................... 195 Trading Markets............................................. 195 Market Price Information.................................... 195 ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION...................................... 198 Objects and Purposes........................................ 198 Share Capital............................................... 198 Material Contracts.......................................... 199 Exchange Controls........................................... 199 Taxation.................................................... 200 Documents on Display........................................ 205 ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK........................................................ 206 Risk Management Organization................................ 206 Market Risk Measurement..................................... 212 Allianz Group Market Risk Exposure Estimates................ 213 ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES...... 217 ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES............. 218 ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS............................................. 218 ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES..................................... 218 ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT............................ 218 ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS.............................................. 218 ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES...................... 218 ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS........................................ 219 ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS........................................ 219 ITEM 19. EXHIBITS.................................................... 219 INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES.................... F-1 ii PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION Unless otherwise indicated, when we use the term "consolidated financial statements," we are referring to the consolidated financial statements (including the related notes) of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft (or Allianz AG, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the Allianz Group) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which have been audited by KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (or IFRS), which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). For a discussion of significant differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP, you should read Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements. All 1999 and 1998 balances have been restated to reflect the retroactive consolidation of certain investment funds in accordance with IAS Standing Interpretations Committee (or SIC) 12. Note 45 to our consolidated financial statements includes a restatement of previous U.S. GAAP reconciling items for the year ended December 31, 2000. Income statement balances in 2002 and 2001 have been reclassified to reflect the elimination of certain amounts recorded as both reserve adjustments and expenses. In addition, the amounts set forth in some of the tables may not add up to the total amounts given in those tables due to rounding. References herein to "DM" are to Deutsche marks, references to "$", "US$" and "U.S. dollars" are to United States dollars and references to "E" and "euro" are to the euro, the single currency established for participants in the third stage of the European Economic and Monetary Union (or EMU), commencing January 1, 1999. We refer to the countries participating in the third stage of the EMU as the "euro zone." Prior to December 31, 1998, we prepared and reported our consolidated financial statements in DM. With the introduction of the euro on January 1, 1999, we have adopted the euro as our reporting currency. Accordingly, our DM consolidated financial statements for 1998 have been restated into euro using the official fixed conversion rate of E1.00 = DM1.95583. Our 1998 restated euro financial statements depict the same trends as would have been presented if the financial statements had been continued to be presented in DM. However, the consolidated financial statements will not be comparable to the euro financial statements of other companies that previously reported their financial information in a currency other than DM. For convenience only (except where noted otherwise), some of the euro figures have been translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of US$1.1710 = E1.00, the noon buying rate in New York for cable transfers in euros certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for customs purposes on June 18, 2003. These translations do not mean that the euro amounts actually represent those U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at those rates. See "Key Information -- Exchange Rate Information" for information concerning the noon buying rates for the DM and the euro from January 1, 1998 through June 18, 2003. Unless otherwise indicated, when we use the terms "gross premiums," "gross premiums written" and "gross written premiums," we are referring to premiums (whether or not earned) for insurance policies written during a specific period, without deduction for premiums ceded to reinsurers, and when we use the terms "net premiums," "net premiums written" and "net written premiums," we are referring to premiums (whether or not earned) for insurance policies written during a specified period, after deduction for premiums ceded to reinsurers. Unless otherwise indicated, we have obtained data regarding the relative size of various national insurance markets from annual reports prepared by SIGMA, an independent organization which publishes market research data on the insurance industry. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, insurance market share data are based on gross premiums written. Data on market share within particular countries is based on our own internal estimates. 1 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This annual report includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements under "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects," "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" and elsewhere in this annual report relating to, among other things, our future financial performance, plans and expectations regarding developments in our business, growth and profitability, and general industry and business conditions applicable to the Allianz Group. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "intends," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or other similar terminology. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements or those of our industry to be materially different from or worse than those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation: - general economic conditions, including in particular economic conditions in our core business areas and core markets; - function and performance of global financial markets, including emerging markets; - frequency and severity of insured loss events, including terror attacks, environmental and asbestos claims; - mortality and morbidity levels and trends; - persistency levels; - interest rate levels; - currency exchange rate developments, including the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate; - levels of additional loan loss provisions due to weakening credit quality; - further impairments of investments; - general competitive factors, in each case on a local, regional, national and global level; - changes in laws and regulations, including in the United States and in the European Union; - changes in the policies of central banks and/or foreign governments; - the impact of our acquisition of Dresdner Bank AG, including related integration and restructuring issues; and - terror attacks, events of war, and their respective consequences. 2 PART I ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS Not applicable. ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE Not applicable. ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA The selected consolidated financial data set forth below are derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft. We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS, which differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a description of the significant differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP and a reconciliation of certain income statement and balance sheet items to U.S. GAAP, you should read Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements. You should read the information below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the other financial information we have included elsewhere in this annual report. AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- 2002(1) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998(2) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ E E E E E (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) IFRS CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT DATA Gross premiums written(3) Property-Casualty............... 50,697 43,294 42,137 38,382 36,027 30,868 Life/Health..................... 24,196 20,663 20,145 20,239 18,473 15,882 Consolidation adjustments(4).... (941) (804) (694) (736) (693) (543) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total........................ 73,952 63,153 61,588 57,885 53,807 46,207 Premiums earned (net)............. 64,561 55,133 52,745 49,907 46,182 39,781 Total income Property-Casualty............... 65,056 55,556 48,770 45,197 42,079 35,687 Life/Health..................... 42,784 36,536 34,092 37,251 32,723 27,319 Banking Operations.............. 24,913 21,275 12,755 1,722 1,795 1,266 Asset Management Operations..... 3,730 3,185 2,738 1,722 693 754 Consolidation adjustments(4).... (10,394) (8,876) (2,705) (2,103) (1,471) (1,519) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total........................ 126,089 107,676 95,650 83,789 75,819 63,507 Net income........................ (1,367) (1,167) 1,623 3,460 2,317 2,177 Earnings per share................ (5.63) (4.81) 6.66 14.10 9.46 8.97 Earnings per share, diluted....... (5.63) (4.81) 6.66 14.10 9.46 8.97 U.S. GAAP CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT DATA Net income........................ (1,403) (1,198) 4,284 6,531(5) 2,869 2,185 Net income per share.............. (6.08) (5.19) 18.96 28.90(5) 11.70 9.01 3 AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- 2002(1) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998(2) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- $ E E E E E (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) IFRS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA Total investments(6).............. 845,567 722,090 809,630 350,895 331,700 300,868 Total assets...................... 997,758 852,056 942,925 439,995 410,690 365,575 Total insurance reserves.......... 358,048 305,763 299,512 284,824 268,064 237,663 Total liabilities................. 972,263 830,284 911,261 404,392 381,014 340,508 Issued capital and capital reserves........................ 17,313 14,785 14,769 7,994 7,811 7,721 Shareholders' equity.............. 25,495 21,772 31,664 35,603 29,676 25,066 Shareholders' equity per share.... 105 90 131 145 121 103 Weighted average number of shares outstanding Basic........................... 284.3 242.8 243.6 245.4 245.0 242.5 Diluted......................... 284.3 242.8 243.6 245.4 245.0 242.5 U.S. GAAP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA Shareholders' equity.............. 26,857 22,935 31,706 35,113(5) 30,003 25,457 Shareholders' equity per share.... 116 99 140 155(5) 122 104 OTHER FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA Combined ratio (for the period)... 105.7% 105.7% 108.8% 104.9% 104.5% 100.8% Third-party assets................ 656,449 560,588 620,458 336,424 29,506 22,548 Market capitalization............. 25,892 22,111 64,156 97,813 81,920 77,513 --------------- (1) Amounts given in euros have been translated for convenience only into U.S. dollars at the rate of US$1.1710 = E1.00, the noon buying rate in New York for cable transfers in euros certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for customs purposes on June 18, 2003. See "Presentation of Financial and Other Information." (2) All 1998 balances have been restated from Deutsche marks into euros using the official fixed conversion rate. See "Presentation of Financial and Other Information." (3) In some countries, health insurance operations are reflected in either or both of the property-casualty and life/health segments in accordance with local practice and regulatory considerations. (4) Represents the elimination of intercompany transactions between Group companies in different segments. (5) See Note 45 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our restatement of previous U.S. GAAP reconciling items. (6) Includes separate account assets. For additional information on investments, see "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Asset Management Operations." DIVIDENDS The following table sets forth the annual dividends paid per ordinary share and American Depositary Share (or ADS) equivalent for 1998 through 2002. The table does not reflect the 4 related tax credits available to German taxpayers. See "Additional Information -- Taxation -- German Taxation -- Taxation of Dividends." DIVIDEND DIVIDEND PAID PER ORDINARY PER ADS SHARE EQUIVALENT ------------- ------------- E(1) $(2) E(1) $(2) 1998........................................................ 1.12 1.06 0.112 0.106 1999........................................................ 1.25 1.18 0.125 0.118 2000........................................................ 1.50 1.42 0.150 0.142 2001........................................................ 1.50 1.42 0.150 0.142 2002........................................................ 1.50 1.76 0.150 0.176 --------------- (1) Dividends for 1998 were declared in Deutsche marks. (2) Dividend amounts given in euros have been translated for convenience only into U.S. dollars at the rate of US$1.1710 = E1.00, the noon buying rate in New York for cable transfers in euros certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for customs purposes on June 18, 2003. See "Presentation of Financial and Other Information." Although the ability to pay future dividends will depend upon our future earnings, financial condition (including our cash needs), prospects and other factors, we do not presently anticipate any changes to our current dividend policy. However, you should not assume that any dividends will actually be paid or make any assumptions about the amount of dividends which will be paid in any given year. See "Financial Information -- Dividend Policy." EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION Germany is a member of the European Community. Pursuant to the Maastricht Treaty to which Germany and other members of the European Community are signatories, the euro is legal tender in those member states of the EMU that satisfied the convergence criteria set forth in the Maastricht Treaty, including Germany. The euro replaced the Deutsche mark as the official currency of Germany on January 1, 1999, after which the Deutsche mark continued to exist solely as a subdivision of the euro. The Deutsche mark ceased to be legal tender in the Federal Republic of Germany on January 1, 2002. The conversion rate between the Deutsche mark and the euro in the period between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2002 was fixed by the Council of the European Union at DM1.95583 = E1.00. As of January 1, 1999, we declare all dividends in euros. As a result, euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of any cash dividend received by holders of ordinary shares or ADSs. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, information concerning the noon buying rates for the euro expressed in U.S. dollars per E1.00. No representation is made that the euro or U.S. dollar amounts referred to herein could be or could have been converted into U.S. dollars or euros, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. Since the euro did not exist prior to January 1, 1999, we cannot present actual exchange rates between the euro and the U.S. dollar for earlier periods in our consolidated financial statements and in the other financial information discussed in this annual report. To enable you to ascertain how the trends in our financial results might have appeared had they been expressed in U.S. dollars, the table below shows the high, low, average and period-end exchange rates of U.S. dollars per euro for the periods shown. For all periods prior to the creation of the euro on January 1, 1999, this information has been calculated using the noon buying rates for the Deutsche mark per US$1.00 for each period, as translated into euro at the official fixed rate of DM1.95583 = E1.00. 5 PERIOD PERIOD HIGH LOW AVERAGE(1) END ---- --- ---------- ------ ($ PER E1.00) 1998................................................. 1.2178 1.0548 1.1120 1.1733 1999................................................. 1.1812 1.0016 1.0588 1.0070 2000................................................. 1.0335 0.8270 0.9207 0.9388 2001................................................. 0.9535 0.8370 0.8909 0.8901 2002................................................. 1.0485 0.9927 0.9495 1.0485 December........................................... 1.0485 0.9927 1.0206 1.0485 2003 January............................................ 1.0861 1.0361 1.0550 1.0739 February........................................... 1.0875 1.0708 1.0770 1.0779 March.............................................. 1.1062 1.0545 1.0868 1.0900 April.............................................. 1.1180 1.0621 1.1042 1.1180 May................................................ 1.1853 1.1200 1.1502 1.1766 June (until June 18, 2003)......................... 1.1870 1.1678 1.1790 1.1710 --------------- (1) Computed using the average of the noon buying rates for Deutsche marks or euros on the last business day of each month during the relevant annual period or on the first and last business days of each month during the relevant monthly period. On June 18, 2003, the noon buying rate for the euro was US$1.1710. 6 RISK FACTORS You should carefully review the following risk factors together with the other information contained in this annual report before making an investment decision. Our financial position and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by each of these risks. The market price of our ADSs may decline as a result of each of these risks and investors may lose the value of their investment in whole or in part. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we now deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business and your investment. INTEREST RATE VOLATILITY MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. Changes in prevailing interest rates (including changes in the difference between the levels of prevailing short- and long-term rates) can affect our insurance, asset management and banking results. Over the past several years, movements in both short- and long-term interest rates have affected the level and timing of recognition of gains and losses on securities held in our various investment portfolios. Our investment portfolios are heavily weighted toward euro-denominated fixed-income investments. Accordingly, interest rate movements in the euro zone will significantly affect the value of our investment portfolios. In 2002, lower interest rates resulted in a decline in current income from new investments in fixed-income securities as higher yielding investments matured. An increase in interest rates could substantially decrease the value of the fixed income portfolio, and any unexpected change in interest rates could materially adversely affect our bond and interest rate derivative positions. Excluding separate account assets and trading assets, our insurance investment portfolio consists primarily of fixed income securities, which represented approximately 74% of our insurance investments at December 31, 2002. Excluding trading assets, certain loans to banks and loans to customers, our banking investment portfolio consists primarily of fixed-income securities (approximately 65% at December 31, 2002). The short-term impact of interest rate fluctuations on our life/health insurance business may be reduced in part by products designed to partly or entirely transfer our exposure to interest rate movements to the policyholder. While product design reduces our exposure to interest rate volatility, changes in interest rates will impact this business to the extent they result in changes to current interest income, impact the value of our fixed income portfolio, and affect the levels of new product sales or surrenders of business in force. In addition, reductions in the investment income below the rates assumed in product pricing, or below the regulatory minimum required rates in countries such as Germany and Switzerland, would reduce or eliminate the profit margins on the life/health insurance business written by our life/health subsidiaries. Results of our asset management business may also be affected by movements in interest rates, since management fees are generally based on the value of assets under management, which fluctuate with changes in the level of interest rates. In addition, our management of interest rate risks affects the results of our banking operations. The composition of our banking assets and liabilities, and any mismatches resulting from that composition, cause the net income of our banking operations to vary with changes in interest rates. We are particularly impacted by changes in interest rates as they relate to different maturities of contracts and the different currencies in which we hold interest rate positions. A mismatch with respect to maturity of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in any given period can have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of our banking business. In 2002, both the net interest margin and the net interest spread in our banking operations declined significantly from 2001 levels, due to changes in the mix of our assets and liabilities. If we are unable to manage any mismatch between our interest earning-assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the consequences of further declines in net interest margin and net interest income could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For 7 additional information, see "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations." OUR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO IS SIGNIFICANTLY EXPOSED TO EQUITY SECURITIES. MARKET RISKS COULD IMPAIR THIS PORTFOLIO AND ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. We hold a significant equity portfolio, which represented approximately 19% of our investments (excluding separate account assets, trading assets, certain loans to banks and loans to customers) at December 31, 2002. Our equity investment portfolio includes, in particular, large stakes in a number of major German companies, including Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft in Munchen (or Munich Re) and Beiersdorf AG, significant holdings in companies in France and Italy and equity investments in companies in virtually all major financial markets of the world. Fluctuations in equity markets affect the market value and liquidity of these holdings. Most of our assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value, including trading assets and liabilities, and securities available for sale. Changes in the value of securities held for trading purposes are recorded through the consolidated statement of income. Changes in the market value of securities available for sale are recorded directly in the consolidated shareholders' equity. Securities available for sale are reviewed regularly for impairments, and valuation writedowns to fair value are charged to income if an other than temporary diminution in value occurs. If a decline in the market value below the original cost of an available for sale security is considered other than temporary, the decline in value will be recorded in the consolidated income statement. A decline in the market value below the original cost of a security available for sale generally is determined to be other than temporary if it is 20% or more below book value for more than six consecutive months. In 2002, developments in the capital markets had a significant impact on our investment portfolios, reducing their value by E60.0 billion. In particular, reduced valuations of our equity portfolio led to a reduction of approximately E7.2 billion in the amount of net unrealized gains in our shareholders' equity. We recorded an additional net income effect of E846 million from impairment losses on our equity portfolio in the first quarter of 2003. If equity markets continue to decline, further significant impairments affecting net income and reductions in shareholders' equity could be realized in 2003. Accordingly, in the event of further market declines, there can be no assurance as to the amount or timing of future unrealized losses or impairments of equity securities, which may, in each case, materially adversely impact our results of operations and shareholders' equity. MARKET FACTORS, AS WELL AS A LACK OF IMPROVEMENT IN OUR OPERATING PERFORMANCE, COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT GOODWILL, DEFERRED ACQUISITION COSTS AND DEFERRED TAX ASSETS; OUR DEFERRED TAX ASSETS ARE ALSO POTENTIALLY IMPACTED BY CHANGES IN GERMAN TAX LEGISLATION. The current uncertain trends and investment climate in many of our major markets have adversely affected our businesses and profitability in 2002 and can be expected to continue to do so unless conditions improve. Business and market conditions may impact the amount of goodwill we carry in our consolidated accounts. As of December 31, 2002 we have recorded goodwill in an aggregate amount of E13,786 million, of which E2,216 million relates to our banking business, E5,079 million to our asset management business and E6,491 million relates to our insurance business. Our banking operations, of which Dresdner Bank represents by far the most significant component, reported a net loss of E1,358 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. See "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Banking Operations -- Results of Operations." Notwithstanding such loss, at December 31, 2002, we concluded that a writedown of the goodwill relating to Dresdner Bank was not required. We are 8 implementing further turnaround steps and continue to expect the turnaround of our banking operations in the near future. If conditions in our banking operations do not improve or continue to deteriorate, however, an impairment test for the fiscal year 2003 could result in a significant writedown of goodwill, adversely impacting our results of operations. As the value of certain other parts of our businesses, including in particular our asset management business, are also significantly impacted by such factors as the state of financial markets and ongoing operating performance, significant declines in financial markets or operating performance could also result in impairment of other goodwill carried by us and result in further significant writedowns, which could be material. The assumptions we made with respect to recoverability of deferred acquisition costs (or DAC), particularly in our annuity business in the United States, are also affected by such factors as operating performance and market conditions. DAC is incurred in connection with the production of new business and deferred, to be amortized generally in proportion to profits expected to be generated over the life of the underlying contracts. If the assumptions on which expected profits are based prove to be incorrect, it may be necessary to accelerate amortization of DAC, which could materially adversely affect results of operations. As of December 31, 2002, we had a total of E13,258 million in deferred tax assets. We also recorded deferred tax liabilities of E12,188 million. The calculation of the respective tax assets and liabilities is based on current tax laws and accounting standards and depends on the performance of the Group as a whole and certain business units in particular. At December 31, 2002, E4,910 million (E3,019 million as of December 31, 2001) of deferred tax assets depended on the ability to use existing tax-loss carry forwards. Changes in tax legislation or regulations or an operating performance below currently anticipated levels may lead to a significant impairment of tax assets. The Draft Bill on the Reduction of Tax Privileges (Steuervergunstigungsabbaugesetz) proposed by the German government accordingly provided for a minimum taxation, pursuant to which tax loss carryforwards could be offset against only 50% of taxable profits for purposes of corporate and trade income tax. In addition, the proposal included limitations on the use of tax credits from prior year profits in connection with profit distributions. After the draft act was passed by the German First Chamber (Bundestag) and rejected by the Second Chamber (Bundesrat), on April 9, 2003, the Mediation Committee (Vermittlungsausschuss) of the Bundestag and Bundesrat proposed a compromise to the Draft Bill on the Reduction of Tax Privileges. The proposed compromise included essentially a temporary restriction of the use of accrued corporate tax credits through the introduction of a three-year moratorium. The proposals that were not included in the compromise, however, are expected to be reintroduced, perhaps in modified form in a separate legislative process. In this case, we could be obligated to write-off certain tax assets. Tax assets may also need to be written down if certain assumptions of profitability prove to be incorrect, as losses incurred for longer than expected will make the usability of tax assets more unlikely. Any such development may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. ALLIANZ AG OPERATES BOTH AS A REINSURANCE COMPANY AND AS A HOLDING COMPANY FOR THE ALLIANZ GROUP, AND IS EXPOSED TO VARIOUS LIQUIDITY RISKS. Allianz AG acts as the principal reinsurer for the Group companies. At the same time, Allianz AG is a holding company, conducting its insurance and financial services operations through direct and indirect subsidiaries. In addition to premiums from our reinsurance operations, the principal sources of Allianz AG's funds are dividends received from subsidiaries, associated companies and other equity investments as well as funds that we may raise from time to time through the issuance of debt or equity securities or through bank or other borrowings. Allianz AG's uses of funds include payment of interest on our outstanding debt, obligations arising in our reinsurance business, which may include large and unpredictable claims including 9 catastrophe claims, as well as the funding of potential capital requirements of our operating subsidiaries or of acquisitions. As of December 31, 2002, Allianz AG had total outstanding debt of E35,475 million (2001: E23,219 million), including amounts owed to credit institutions of E2,247 million, outstanding subordinated debt instruments of E3,575 million and outstanding non-subordinated debt instruments of E29,654 million (2001: E3,079 million, E0 million and E20,140 million, respectively). For the year ended December 31, 2002, Allianz AG made payments of E1,111 million in respect of interest on outstanding debt. E1,810 million of long-term debt of Allianz AG to non-Group companies matures during 2003. Allianz AG has implemented a hedging strategy to protect its equity portfolio from further losses due to downward market moves. This strategy includes the use of forward contracts for which -- in the case of adverse market moves -- margin payments have to be made. Those margin payments have to be made in cash. In addition, on each of March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, respectively, a subsidiary of Allianz AG received notice from the former parent company of our asset management subsidiary PIMCO Group (or PIMCO) that such former parent company had exercised its right to put US$250 million of its remaining ownership interest in PIMCO to Allianz, with payment therefor due by April 30, 2003 and July 31, 2003, respectively. The first such payment was made on April 14, 2003. For additional discussion concerning these put arrangements, see "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Recent Developments" and "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Asset Management Operations -- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Net Income." Allianz AG expects that its premiums from its own reinsurance business, together with dividends and other amounts received from subsidiaries, associated companies and other investments, will continue to cover its operating expenses, including interest payments on its outstanding debt, together with its reinsurance and other obligations. As a holding company, Allianz AG can offer no assurance, however, that funds available to it will continue to be sufficient to meet its operating expenses, funding obligations and interest payments in the future, and that it will not need to raise additional funds from time to time through the issuance of debt or equity securities, through bank or other borrowings or through dispositions of assets or other transactions, nor as to the adequacy or timing of any such measures. LOSS RESERVES FOR OUR PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE POLICIES ARE BASED ON ESTIMATES AS TO FUTURE CLAIMS LIABILITIES. IN 2002, WE MADE SIGNIFICANT ADDITIONAL RESERVES RELATING TO ASBESTOS-RELATED AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN CONNECTION WITH DISCONTINUED AND RUN-OFF BUSINESSES. FURTHER ADVERSE DEVELOPMENTS RELATING TO CLAIMS COULD LEAD TO FURTHER RESERVE ADDITIONS AND MATERIALLY ADVERSELY IMPACT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. In accordance with industry practice and accounting and regulatory requirements, we establish reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses related to our property-casualty insurance and reinsurance businesses, including discontinued property and casualty business in run-off. Reserves are based on estimates of future payments that will be made in respect of claims, including expenses relating to such claims. Such estimates are made both on a case-by- case basis, based on the facts and circumstances available at the time the reserves are established, as well as in respect of losses that have been incurred but not reported (or IBNR) to the Group. These reserves represent the estimated ultimate cost necessary to bring all pending reported and IBNR claims to final settlement. Reserves, including IBNR reserves, are subject to change due to a number of variables which affect the ultimate cost of claims, such as changes in the legal environment, results of litigation, changes in medical costs, costs of repairs and risk factors such as inflation. Our earnings depend significantly upon the extent to which our actual claims experience is consistent with the assumptions we use in setting the prices for products and establishing the liabilities for 10 obligations for technical provisions and claims. To the extent that our actual claims experience is less favorable than the underlying assumptions used in establishing such liabilities, we may be required to increase our reserves, which may materially adversely effect earnings. Reserves Generally. Established loss reserves estimates are periodically adjusted in the ordinary course of settlement, using the most current information available to management, and any adjustments resulting from changes in reserve estimates are reflected in current results of operations. We also conduct reviews of various lines of business to consider the adequacy of reserve levels, as we did recently with our asbestos and environmental exposure in the United States. Based on current information available to us and on the basis of our internal procedures, our management considers that these reserves are adequate. However, because the establishment of claims reserves is an inherently uncertain process, there can be no assurance that ultimate losses will not materially exceed our loss reserves and have a material adverse effect on our earnings. See "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves -- General." Asbestos-related and Environmental Pollution Claims. In relation to asbestos-related and environmental pollution, it has been necessary, and may over time continue to be necessary, to revise estimated potential loss exposure and, therefore, the related loss reserves. Changes in law, novel or changing policy interpretations, evolving judicial theories as well as developments in class action litigation add to the uncertainties inherent in claims of this nature. As a result, we continue to monitor developments in asbestos-related and environmental claims and may determine that further adjustments in the reserve amounts are required in the future. In 2002, reserves were increased for asbestos and environmental claims in the United States by E762 million following external and internal actuarial reviews. Discontinued and Run-off Insurance Businesses. We maintain loss reserves in our discontinued and run-off insurance businesses to cover our estimated ultimate liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses for reported and unreported losses incurred as of the end of each accounting period. We have discontinued certain lines of business formerly pursued by Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (or Fireman's Fund) in the United States, including the surety, national accounts, diversified risk and medical malpractice lines of business. Commercial auto liability, medical malpractice, other liability and workers' compensation reserves were increased in respect of prior years in the amount of E230 million in 2002. We believe that reserves associated with discontinued lines are adequate; however, the costs and liabilities associated with these divested and run-off businesses and other contingent liabilities could cause us to take additional charges that could be material to our results of operations. In particular, Fireman's Fund has issued surety bonds in favor of certain companies, some of which are currently experiencing financial difficulties. In the case of a default in respect of the obligations covered by the surety bonds, Fireman's Fund could be required to establish significant additional loss reserves. ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE AND OTHER FACTORS COULD DIFFER FROM THAT ASSUMED IN THE CALCULATION OF LIFE/HEALTH ACTUARIAL RESERVES AND PENSION LIABILITIES. The assumptions we make in assessing our life/health insurance reserves may differ from what we experience in the future. We derive our life/health insurance reserves using "best estimate" actuarial practices and assumptions. These assumptions include the assessment of the long term development of interest rates, investment returns, the allocation of investments between equity, fixed income and other categories, policyholder bonus rates (some of which are guaranteed), mortality and morbidity rates, policyholder lapses and future expense levels. We monitor our actual experience of these assumptions and to the extent that we consider that this experience will continue in the longer term we refine our long-term assumptions. Similarly, estimates of our own pension obligations necessarily depend on assumptions concerning future actuarial, demographic, macroeconomic and financial markets developments. Changes in any 11 such assumptions may lead to changes in the estimates of life/health insurance reserves or pension obligations. We have a substantial portfolio of contracts with guaranteed investment returns, including endowment and annuity products for the German market as well as certain guaranteed contracts in other markets. The amounts payable by us at maturity of an endowment policy in Germany and in certain other markets include a "guaranteed benefit," an amount that, in practice, is equal to a legally mandated maximum rate of return on actuarial reserves. In Germany, this rate is currently 3.25% per year for policies issued on or after July 1, 2000 and with euro as applicable currency, and for policies issued through June 2000, the maximum rate of return is 4.0% per annum. For policies issued prior to 1995, the maximum rate is 3.5% or 3.0%, depending on the generation of tariff. The average interest rate that was guaranteed in Germany at the end of 2002 was approximately 3.5%. If interest rates should remain at current historically low levels, we could be required to provide additional funds to our life/health subsidiaries to support their obligations in respect of products with higher guaranteed returns, or increase reserves in respect of such products, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In the United States, we have a substantial portfolio of contracts with guaranteed investment returns indexed to equity markets. We enter into hedging arrangements in order to meet the expected returns of the contracts. There can be no assurance that the hedging arrangements will satisfy the returns guaranteed to policyholders. OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS MAY BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE OCCURRENCE OF CATASTROPHES. Portions of our property and casualty insurance cover losses from unpredictable events such as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods and other man-made or natural disasters. The incidence and severity of these catastrophes in any given period are inherently unpredictable. Although we monitor our overall exposure to catastrophes and other unpredictable events in each geographic region, each of our subsidiaries independently determines its own underwriting limits related to insurance coverage for losses from catastrophic events. We generally seek to reduce our exposure to these events through the purchase of reinsurance, selective underwriting practices and by monitoring risk accumulation. However, such efforts to reduce exposure may not be successful and claims relating to catastrophes may result in unusually high levels of losses and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. During 2002 and 2001 we incurred significant catastrophe losses, in particular net claims costs of approximately E1.5 billion relating to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. We also suffered losses from severe flooding in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe which adversely affected our results by E710 million in 2002. If catastrophes affecting properties insured by us continue to occur with such frequency or with greater frequency or severity than has historically been the case, related claims could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT COUNTERPARTY RISK EXPOSURE. We are subject to a variety of counterparty risks, including: General credit risks. Third parties that owe us money, securities or other assets may not pay or perform under their obligations. These parties include the issuers whose securities we hold, borrowers under loans made, customers, trading counterparties, counterparties under swaps and credit and other derivative contracts, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other financial intermediaries. These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, downturns in the economy or real estate values, operational failure or other reasons. In addition, under credit default swaps, which Dresdner Bank has entered into, 12 Dresdner Bank may become obliged to make payments if and when a default of a particular debtor occurs. During 2002, we recognized losses of E2,818 million due to these credit exposures, including writedowns and write-offs in our fixed income portfolio. The current uncertain trends and investment climate in financial markets have resulted in an increase in investment impairments on our investment assets due to defaults and credit downgrades and a further downturn in the economy generally could result in increased impairments. In addition, we are subject to geographic and industry concentrations with respect to our credit exposures, and as a result developments in particular geographic regions or industries may adversely impact us. In particular, we have extended significant credit to financial institutions in Germany, and as a result any systemic risk materializing in the German financial industry could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Reinsurers. We transfer our exposure to certain risks in our property-casualty and life insurance business to others through reinsurance arrangements. Under these arrangements, other insurers assume a portion of our losses and expenses associated with reported and unreported losses in exchange for a portion of policy premiums. The availability, amount and cost of reinsurance depend on general market conditions and may vary significantly. Any decrease in the amount of our reinsurance will increase our risk of loss. When we obtain reinsurance, we are still liable for those transferred risks if the reinsurer cannot meet its obligations. Therefore, the inability of our reinsurers to meet their financial obligations could materially affect our results of operations. Although we conduct periodic reviews of the financial statements and reputations of our reinsurers, the reinsurers may become financially unsound by the time they are called upon to pay amounts due, which may not occur for many years. For a discussion of our external reinsurance relationships, see "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Property-Casualty Operations By Geographic Region -- Allianz AG." FURTHER POOR OPERATING PERFORMANCE, DIFFICULTIES IN MANAGING AND DELAYS IN COMPLETING THE INTEGRATION OF DRESDNER BANK WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS. In July 2001, we acquired Dresdner Bank. Our banking operations, of which Dresdner Bank is the most significant component, suffered significant net losses in 2002. In addition to poor operating performance, continuing difficulties in managing and integrating the additional operations and personnel, significant delays in completing the integration of Dresdner Bank and any loss of key employees or customers could adversely affect our results. The future success of our banking business depends in large part on our ability to restore the profitability of Dresdner Bank, and it is possible that the anticipated benefits from the acquisition may not be realized in full, may take longer to realize than expected or may not be realized at all. In the event that management is unable to successfully implement the restructuring and cost-cutting measures announced to date, our financial performance and results of operations may continue to be materially adversely affected. DRESDNER BANK MAY EXPERIENCE FURTHER SIGNIFICANT LOSSES RELATING TO PROBLEM LOANS. At December 31, 2002, following the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hypothekenbank AG (or Deutsche Hyp) on August 1, 2002, our non-performing loans and potential problem loans, substantially all of which were attributable to Dresdner Bank, were E11,625 million and E2,437 million, respectively, representing a net increase of E1,276 million, or 12.3%, in non-performing loans, and E231 million, or 10.5%, in potential problem loans from year-end 2001 (excluding the loan portfolio of Deutsche Hyp). A substantial majority of Dresdner Bank's problem loans is comprised of loans made to German corporate customers as well as to individuals. Certain of its loans to corporate customers represent significant credit exposure to individual companies. As a result of the effects 13 of the weak economic conditions in Germany, which have continued into 2003, as well as recent financial difficulties faced by Dresdner Bank's customers, we have recorded substantial provisions. For the year ended December 31, 2002, additional net loan loss provisions in our banking segment were E2,222 million, including E3,106 million of gross new provisions. Of the new provisions, E2,151 million were specific provisions relating to both Dresdner Bank's German corporate business, including small businesses and professionals, and its non-German corporate business, especially in Latin America and the United States, reflecting the continued weakness in the global economy, deteriorating credit quality of borrowers, declines in collateral value, inability to enforce its security interest in collateral and increased insolvencies. Of the new loan loss provisions in 2002, approximately E1,259 million were specific provisions relating to our German business, including small businesses and professionals. Our banking operations also recorded specific provisions of E665 million relating to private individuals and E73 million relating to banks. Dresdner Bank may need to make additional loan loss provisions or recognize further credit losses as a result of continuing weak economic conditions, declines in collateral value, inability to enforce security interests in collateral, an increase in corporate or personal bankruptcies, in particular in Germany, further deterioration of the financial position of Dresdner Bank's borrowers or changes in reserve and risk management requirements. Any such developments could materially adversely affect our results of operations or result in further capital requirements in its banking operations. A REDUCED CAPITAL BASE AT DRESDNER BANK, TOGETHER WITH FURTHER ADDITIONAL WRITEDOWNS AND IMPAIRMENTS, COULD RESULT IN CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS THAT MAY CONSTRAIN OUR OPERATIONS. Dresdner Bank's capital ratios at December 31, 2002 were 6.0% in the case of consolidated Tier 1 capital and 10.6% in the case of consolidated total capital under BIS principles. In recent years, Dresdner Bank has suffered from poor operating performance, an increased level of loan loss allowances, deteriorating asset quality and substantial impairments in its investment portfolio. Dresdner Bank had to set aside significant new provisions for possible loan losses in 2002, and additional provisions may be required in the future. If these trends continue, there can be no assurance that Dresdner Bank will be able to maintain its capital ratios at the above mentioned levels. Failure to do so could require us to restrict our banking operations, or further support our banking operations through injection of additional capital. See "Information on the Company and the Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Regulation and Supervision" for a discussion of the capital adequacy guidelines applicable to our banking operations. Further, the risk-adjusted capital guidelines (or Basle Accord) promulgated by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision, which form the basis for the capital adequacy guidelines of the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (the Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, or BaFin), are being revised and implementation is planned for 2006. At this time, we are unable to predict how the revised guidelines will affect our requirements for capital and the impact of these revisions on our banking or other operations. MANY OF OUR BUSINESSES ARE DEPENDENT ON THE FINANCIAL STRENGTH AND CREDIT RATINGS ASSIGNED TO US AND OUR BUSINESSES BY VARIOUS RATING AGENCIES. THEREFORE, A DOWNGRADE IN OUR RATINGS MAY MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECT RELATIONSHIPS WITH CUSTOMERS AND INTERMEDIARIES, NEGATIVELY IMPACT SALES OF OUR PRODUCTS AND INCREASE OUR COST OF BORROWING. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (or Standard & Poor's), Moody's Investor Services (or Moody's) and A.M. Best assign ratings to various obligations of certain Group companies. On March 20, 2003, Standard & Poor's cut the Group's financial strength ratings from AA to AA-, citing the Group's negative performance and reduced capital base resulting from significant writedowns and losses in the period to December 31, 2002, and noted that Allianz AG continued to be on "negative outlook." Although Moody's maintained its rating of Aa2 for the senior unsecured debt securities issued by the Group's finance subsidiaries, Moody's rating also had a 14 negative outlook. On May 22, 2003, Moody's placed the rating under review for possible downgrade. On March 21, 2003 A.M. Best also cut the Group's financial strength rating from A++ to A+, and noted that Allianz AG continued to be on "negative outlook." Rating agencies can be expected to continue to monitor our financial strength, and no assurances can be given that further ratings downgrades will not occur, whether due to changes in our performance, changes in rating agencies' industry views or ratings methodologies, or a combination of such factors. Claims paying ability and financial strength ratings are a factor in establishing the competitive position of insurers. Our financial strength rating has a significant impact on the individual ratings of key subsidiaries. If a rating of certain subsidiaries falls below a certain threshold, the respective operating business may be significantly impacted. A ratings downgrade, or the potential for such a downgrade, of the Group or any of its insurance subsidiaries could, among other things, adversely affect relationships with agents, brokers and other distributors of our products and services, thereby negatively impact new sales, adversely affect our ability to compete in our markets and increase our cost of borrowing. In particular, in those countries where primary distribution of our products is done through independent agents, such as the United States, further ratings downgrades could adversely impact sales of our life insurance products. Any further ratings downgrades will also materially adversely affect our cost of raising capital, and could, in addition, give rise to additional financial obligations or accelerate existing financial obligations which are dependent on maintaining specified rating levels. IF OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT BUSINESS UNDERPERFORMS, IT MAY EXPERIENCE A DECLINE IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT AND RELATED FEE INCOME. While the assets under management in our asset management segment include a significant amount of funds related to affiliated Allianz Group insurance operations, a growing portion of our assets under management, particularly following the acquisitions of PIMCO in May 2000, Nicholas-Applegate in January 2001 and Dresdner Bank in July 2001, represents third-party funds. In 2002, despite substantial increases in third-party assets under management, declines in world equity markets resulted in reductions in the value of the equity portfolios in our asset management business as customers withdrew or re-allocated funds from equities. Results of our asset management activities are affected by share prices, share valuation, interest rates and market volatility. In addition, third-party funds are subject to withdrawal in the event our investment performance is not competitive with other asset management firms. Accordingly, fee income from the asset management business might decline if the level of our third-party assets under management were to continue to decline due to investment performance or otherwise. INCREASED GEOPOLITICAL RISKS FOLLOWING THE TERRORIST ATTACK OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, AND ANY FUTURE TERRORIST ATTACKS, COULD HAVE A CONTINUING NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESSES. After September 11, 2001, reinsurers generally either put terrorism exclusions into their policies or drastically increased the price for such coverage. Although we have attempted to exclude terrorist coverage from policies we write, this has not been possible in all cases. Furthermore, even if terrorism exclusions are permitted in our primary insurance policies, we may still have liability for fires and other consequential damage claims that follow an act of terrorism itself. As a result we may have liability under primary insurance policies for acts of terrorism and may not be able to recover from our reinsurers. At this time, we cannot assess the future effects of terrorist attacks, the ensuing military and other responsive actions, and the possibility of further terrorist attacks, on our businesses. Such matters have significantly adversely affected general economic, market and political conditions, increasing many of the risks in our businesses noted in the previous risk factors. This may have a material negative effect on our businesses and results of operations over time. 15 CHANGES IN EXISTING, OR NEW, GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTRIES IN WHICH WE OPERATE MAY MATERIALLY IMPACT US. Our insurance, banking and asset management businesses are subject to detailed, comprehensive regulation and supervision in all the countries in which we do business. Changes in existing laws and regulations may affect the way in which we conduct our business and the products we may offer. Changes in regulations relating to pensions and employment, social security, financial services including reinsurance business, taxation, securities products and transactions may materially adversely affect our insurance, banking and asset management businesses by restructuring our activities, imposing increased costs or otherwise. In December 2002, the EU adopted a directive that provides for assessment of the capital requirements of a financial conglomerate on the group level, supervision of risk concentration and intra-group transactions and prevention of double-leveraging of the capital of the holding or parent company, i.e. once in the holding or parent company and a second time in the subsidiary ("double-gearing"). We are a financial conglomerate within the scope of this directive. The EU member states are required to implement this directive into national law for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2005. It is as yet unclear how the directive will be implemented in Germany. Therefore, it is impossible to determine what future impact these requirements will have on our capital requirements, but there can be no assurance that the current and future level of capital will be sufficient to meet such requirements. For more information, see "Information on the Company and the Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Regulation and Supervision." CHANGES IN TAX LEGISLATION COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS. Changes to tax laws may affect the attractiveness of certain of our products that currently receive favorable tax treatment. Under current German tax regulations, payments received at the maturity of a life insurance policy with a term of at least 12 years and on which premiums have been paid for at least five years are not taxable, and the life insurance premiums are deductible from the insured's income in the year paid, subject to certain limitation. In recent years, the German legislature has from time to time proposed legislation that would reduce the tax-favored treatment of both premiums and benefit payouts for these life insurance policies. The enactment of legislation reducing the tax benefit associated with our German life insurance products could significantly reduce the attractiveness of life insurance in Germany. Because the German life business accounts for a significant portion of our total income (14.7% in 2002), the enactment of any such legislation could adversely affect our financial results. From time to time, governments in other jurisdictions in which we do business have also considered changes to tax laws which could adversely affect the tax advantages of such products, and if enacted, could result in a significant reduction in the sale of such products. In addition, from time to time, proposals have been made to repeal the provisions of the recently enacted German Tax Reform (see "Taxation -- German Taxation") that exempted from German tax certain capital gains on the disposal of corporate shareholdings. In the event such proposals were to be enacted into law, the Group's ability to dispose of its shareholdings profitably might be significantly affected. CHANGES IN VALUE RELATIVE TO THE EURO OF NON-EURO ZONE CURRENCIES IN WHICH WE GENERATE REVENUES AND INCUR EXPENSES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REPORTED EARNINGS AND CASH FLOW. We prepare our consolidated financial statements in euros. However, a significant portion of the revenues and expenses from our subsidiaries outside the euro zone, including in the United States, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, originates in currencies other than the euro. We expect this trend to continue as we expand our business into growing non-euro zone markets. 16 For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately 30.8% of our gross premiums written originated in currencies other than the euro. As a result, although our non-euro zone subsidiaries generally record their revenues and expenses in the same currency, changes in the exchange rates used to translate foreign currencies into euros may adversely affect our reported results. The strength of the euro against other currencies, in particular the U.S. dollar and pound sterling, reduced premium income by E736 million during 2002. Our third-party assets under management declined by E77 billion during 2002 due to depreciation of other currencies against the euro, in particular, the U.S. dollar. In addition, Allianz AG's dividends are generally payable in euros. Adverse changes in exchange rates used to translate the currencies in which our non euro-zone subsidiaries pay dividends to Allianz AG may materially adversely affect the cash flow available to Allianz AG to pay dividends and other obligations. While our non-euro assets and liabilities, and revenues and related expenses, are generally denominated in the same currencies, we do not generally engage in hedging transactions with respect to dividends or cash flows in respect of our non-euro subsidiaries. THE SHARE PRICE OF ALLIANZ AG HAS BEEN AND MAY CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE. The share price of Allianz AG has been volatile in the past due in part to the high volatility in the securities markets generally, and in financial institutions' shares in particular, as well as developments which impact its financial results. Factors other than our financial results that may affect our share price include but are not limited to: market expectations of the performance and capital adequacy of financial institutions generally; investor perception of, as well as the actual performance of, other financial institutions; investor perception of the success and impact of the strategy, including the capital raising, described in this annual report; a downgrade or rumored downgrade of our credit ratings; potential litigation or regulatory action involving the Allianz Group or any of the industries we have exposure to through our insurance and banking activities; announcements concerning the bankruptcy or other similar reorganization proceedings involving, or any investigations into the accounting practices of, other insurance or reinsurance companies or banks; and general market volatility. 17 ITEMS 4. -- 5. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY AND OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements including the notes thereto. We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS, which differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a description of the significant differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP and a reconciliation of certain income statement and balance sheet items to U.S. GAAP, you should read Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements. Unless otherwise indicated, the financial information we have included in this annual report is presented on a consolidated basis under IFRS. Unless otherwise indicated, we have obtained data regarding the relative size of various national insurance markets from annual reports prepared by SIGMA, an independent organization which publishes market research data on the insurance industry. In addition, unless otherwise indicated, insurance market share data are based on gross premiums written. Data on market share within particular countries are based on our own internal estimates. INTRODUCTION Allianz AG is a stock corporation organized in the Federal Republic of Germany under the German Stock Corporation Act. It was incorporated as Allianz Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft in Berlin, Germany on February 5, 1890. It is registered in the Commercial Register in Munich, Germany under the entry number HR B 7158. Our registered office is located at Koniginstrasse 28, 80802 Munich, Germany, telephone (49)(89) 3800-0. Allianz AG is the ultimate parent company of the Allianz Group. The Allianz Group is one of the world's leading financial services providers, offering insurance, banking and asset management products and services through property-casualty, life/health, banking and asset management business segments. We are one of the leading insurance groups in the world based on gross premiums written in 2002. We are the leading German property-casualty and life/health insurance company, with estimated market shares of approximately 18.3% and 14.2%, respectively, based on gross premiums written in 2002. We also have leading market positions in a number of other countries, including France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Spain. We are the second-largest German financial institution, based on market capitalization at March 31, 2003. We believe that we are well capitalized relative to our competitors, notwithstanding recent downgrades of our ratings in March 2003. As of April 7, 2003, we had financial strength ratings of A+ from A.M. Best and AA- from Standard & Poor's, both with a negative outlook. Moody's does not provide a rating for Allianz AG, but as of April 7, 2003, debt securities issued by our finance subsidiaries had a senior unsecured debt rating of Aa2 from Moody's, again with a negative outlook. On May 22, 2003, Moody's placed the rating under review for possible downgrade. Our investment portfolio includes a number of significant equity participations, primarily in major German companies, including both financial institutions and industrial enterprises. We were founded in 1890 in Berlin, Germany, and since that time we have become the largest German insurer. Through our international expansion strategy, we have sought to bring into the Allianz Group companies that are well-positioned in their domestic markets and that have leading positions in particular business lines and attractive earnings prospects. In the last several years, our non-German insurance business has therefore grown substantially in importance. Gross premiums written by our non-German business represented approximately 63.3% of our total gross premiums written in 2002. We now operate in more than 70 countries worldwide and have leading market positions in many of them. In 1998, building on over a century's experience in managing our extensive insurance investment portfolio, we established financial services as our third core business segment, in 18 addition to our property-casualty and life/health insurance businesses. In 2001, following our acquisition of Dresdner Bank, we reorganized our financial services segment into separate asset management and banking segments. In our asset management segment, the acquisitions of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001 and Nicholas-Applegate on January 31, 2001 increased our third-party assets under management by E228 billion and E36 billion, respectively, as of the respective dates of the acquisitions and made us one of the five leading asset managers in the world based on total assets under management as of December 31, 2002. In our banking segment, which is now our fourth core business segment, our acquisition of Dresdner Bank made us one of the leading banks in Germany and provided us with significantly expanded bank distribution channels for our property-casualty, life/health and asset management products and services. Our German property-casualty and life/health insurance businesses are managed by subsidiaries located primarily in Munich and Stuttgart. Our non-German insurance businesses are locally managed, generally through operations located in France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Spain and the United States, which are our largest non-German markets. In contrast, each of our specialty lines of credit insurance, marine and aviation insurance, industrial reinsurance through Allianz Global Risks Ruckversicherungs-AG (or Allianz Global Risks) and travel and assistance insurance is managed and operates on a global basis. Our asset management segment also operates on a worldwide basis, with key management centers in Munich, Hong Kong, Paris, Milan, Westport, Connecticut, and San Diego and Newport Beach, California. Our banking segment operates through the approximately 1,100 German and non-German branch offices of Dresdner Bank and various subsidiaries, with significant operations in Germany, the United Kingdom, other European countries and the United States. At December 31, 2002, we employed more than 181,000 persons in our insurance, banking and asset management businesses worldwide, of whom more than 94,000 were based outside Germany. Through interdisciplinary and multi-jurisdictional training and advancement programs, we seek to develop and promote a corporate culture that emphasizes technical expertise, dedication to client service and an international outlook. Our headquarters are located in Munich, Germany. In addition, we have subsidiary, branch, representative and similar offices worldwide. We own substantially all of the land and buildings that are used in the normal course of our business in Europe and lease office space in various locations throughout the world. We also have part of our investment portfolio invested in land and buildings. We believe that our facilities are adequate for our present needs in all material respects. STRATEGY This section regarding our strategy contains forward-looking statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the section "Forward-Looking Statements." In addition, for a discussion of the risks involved in achieving our strategic goals, see "Risk Factors." Our strategy is to achieve profitable growth across our four business segments for the benefit of our shareholders, policyholders and employees. We believe that our size, financial strength and worldwide reach are key competitive strengths that will permit us to participate in the ongoing consolidation of the financial services industry and maintain our position as an industry leader. We offer our products through multiple distribution channels including agents and brokers and, in many markets, bancassurance and e-commerce. In our mature markets of Germany, the rest of western Europe and the United States, we believe demographic trends will particularly favor our life/health and asset management businesses in the coming years. We intend to capitalize on cross-selling opportunities between our banking and pension provision businesses for corporate customers and to take advantage of additional potential synergies between our life/health, asset management and banking operations. 19 As a reflection of the underlying strengths of our franchise as well as the leading market positions in many of our businesses, our core strategy remains substantially unchanged. Our five main strategic priorities are: - Optimize the Economic Value Added (EVA) of our Group, based on risk-adjusted capital requirements and sustainable growth targets; - Exploit attractive market opportunities by leveraging our traditional risk management expertise; - Strengthen our leading position in life and health insurance and in asset management, especially in private and corporate retirement insurance plans; - Increase our asset gathering capabilities by building customer-oriented, multi-channel distribution platforms; and - Expand our investments and capital markets expertise. We have implemented Group-wide a rigorous and disciplined capital allocation approach. All capital allocation decisions are based on an internal risk-based model, which, in addition to traditional insurance and banking risks, also takes into account investment and other capital markets risks. We will monitor our risk-adjusted results closely on an ongoing basis. Companies and business lines which are not expected to meet the hurdle risk adjusted return on allocated capital over the medium term will be reviewed for possible divestiture. We manage the business of the Group with a significant degree of autonomy for local management teams. We believe that these teams are best positioned to determine what measures to take to maximize the profitability of their business, and we make them accountable, and compensate them, based on this performance. We measure performance both on a local level as well as on a Group basis based on the EVA model. We also monitor closely the nature and volume of risks accumulated locally as well as across the Group on an ongoing basis. FOCUS ON IMPLEMENTATION Our immediate objective is to address the most significant operating challenges we face: Further strengthening our pricing and underwriting discipline and internal efficiency in line with the EVA requirements, and enforcing these consistently across the Group. As part of this effort, we aim to improve the operational performance of selected operations such as Assurances Generales de France (or AGF, and, together with its subsidiaries, the AGF Group), Fireman's Fund and Allianz Global Risks; - Returning Dresdner Bank to profitability; - Improving the profitability of our life business; - Reducing the dependence of our results on the volatility of the equity markets. OPERATIONAL DISCIPLINE PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE Our goal for 2003 and thereafter is to achieve a combined ratio of below 100% for the group. We are particularly focused on Fireman's Fund, Allianz Global Risks and AGF, businesses with combined ratios of over 100%: - Fireman's Fund's operational discipline is expected to be improved by a new management team, the reduction of headcount, exit of underperforming businesses, recent strengthening of environmental and asbestos reserves and more defensive portfolio management; 20 - Allianz Global Risks is actively seeking to turn its property-casualty business around. Allianz Global Risks has undertaken significant changes including appointing a new management team, introducing clear operational targets and non-renewing certain clients and treaties; - AGF has increased rates, not renewed policies and implemented operational improvements to reduce the expense ratio. TURNAROUND OF DRESDNER BANK PROFITABILITY. Due to the continuing difficult economic environment and the sharp deterioration in the capital markets since late 2001, Dresdner Bank reported significant losses in 2002. We have recently appointed a new CEO of Dresdner Bank and intend to reduce personnel costs, operating expenses and non-core lending to fully exploit the bank's franchise in the coming years. In the last 18 months, Dresdner Bank has significantly reduced its headcount, and plans are in place to further reduce headcount positions. The turnaround program to restore profitability has several components: - IRU: New Institutional Restructuring Unit (or IRU) within our banking segment to free up risk capital through the reduction of risk-weighted assets by restructuring non-performing loans to strategic customers with the intent of returning such loans to the business units from which they originated, while maximizing the recovery from remaining non-performing loans, as well as non-strategic customer loans, through repayment, sale, hedging, securitization and other means. Loans to be bundled together in the IRU are primarily performing loans to non-strategic clients, such as small-capitalization clients in Latin America, Asia and the United States, as well as, to a lesser extent, loans to corporate and private clients that are currently non-performing. The IRU is expected to initially include approximately E31 billion, consisting of approximately E22 billion of loans (including approximately E7 billion of non-performing loans and approximately E1 billion of potential problem loans) and approximately E1 billion of other non-strategic assets, including private equity investments, and approximately E8 billion of undrawn commitments. - Cost-Cutting and Restructuring Measures: -- Ongoing cost-cutting efforts are being stepped up. -- Certain centralized services were transferred to the two business units, Private and Business Clients and Corporates & Markets, which are now directly responsible for managing these costs. CAPITAL AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. We believe that we are well capitalized relative to our competitors, notwithstanding recent downgrades of our ratings in March 2003. As of April 7, 2003, we had financial strength ratings of A+ from A.M. Best and AA- from Standard & Poor's, both with a negative outlook. Moody's does not provide a rating for us, but as of April 7, 2003, debt securities issued by our finance subsidiaries had a senior unsecured debt rating of Aa2 from Moody's, again with a negative outlook. On May 22, 2003, Moody's placed the rating under review for possible downgrade. However, our internal risk based model showed a gap of approximately E1.7 billion as of December 2002. It was therefore decided to launch a capital improvement program to secure our financial strength. REDUCTION OF EQUITY EXPOSURE AND VOLATILITY The reduction of our equity exposure is being addressed through a number of measures. These measures include a significant hedging program to protect us against potential future 21 losses while retaining an upside potential. We will continue to further assess this program to manage our exposures. We also actively sold and expect to continue to sell equity investments to further reduce our equity exposure. This includes, for example, an intended reduction of our stake in Munich Re from 22.4% as of December 31, 2002 to approximately 15% during the course of 2003 and 2004. As of June 30, 2003, our stake in Munich Re had been reduced to approximately 18.9%. On July 10, 2003 we announced our intention to redeem a first tranche of approximately 50% of our index-linked exchangeable bonds (MILES) ahead of schedule, using Munich Re shares. This transaction, when completed, will reduce our shareholding in Munich Re by approximately 3%. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Related Party Transactions -- Transactions with Munich Re." FOCUSED PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION In addition, we will significantly step up our focus on the efficient use of capital in the Group. As stated before, we will implement economic capital savings by discontinuing and selectively scaling down certain business lines. In addition, sub-performing and non-core businesses will be divested if, according to the EVA methodology, a positive contribution to the Group is not expected. CAPITAL RAISING In April 2003, we conducted a capital raising, which was an important element of the decision to strengthen the capital base, with a set of transactions intended to raise total capital of up to E5 billion. By way of a rights offering, we raised approximately E4.4 billion, based on a subscription price of E38.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately E4.3 billion after deduction of the commission payable to the underwriters and other costs borne by us. In a second step -- planned for the second half of this year -- we intend to use the Group's hybrid capital capacity, subject to market conditions and the Group's needs. SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION The following table shows the relative contributions of our property-casualty, life/health, banking and asset management segments and related geographic and other subsegments to our gross premiums written, total income and net income in 2002, 2001 and 2000. The table also shows the impact of consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written and total income by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different geographic regions and different segments, and net 22 income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS TOTAL NET PREMIUMS TOTAL NET PREMIUMS TOTAL NET WRITTEN(1) INCOME INCOME WRITTEN(1) INCOME INCOME WRITTEN(1) INCOME INCOME ---------- ------- ------ ---------- ------ ------ ---------- ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Property-Casualty Germany....................... 12,314 24,019 9,235(2) 12,644 18,382 3,773 11,948 16,966 3,320 Rest of Europe................ 20,494 22,653 1,932 19,606 20,553 848 17,302 20,011 1,285 NAFTA......................... 5,992 5,819 (933) 6,822 6,837 (1,030) 6,300 5,866 (86) Rest of World................. 2,428 2,118 38 2,401 1,787 39 1,886 1,630 5 Specialty Lines............... 4,948 3,712 (199) 2,321 2,303 94 2,267 2,036 227 Consolidation adjustments(3).............. (2,882) (2,765) (1,680) (1,657) (1,092) (265) (1,321) (1,312) (570) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Subtotal.................... 43,294 55,556 8,393 42,137 48,770 3,459 38,382 45,197 4,181 Amortization of goodwill...... -- -- (370) -- -- (349) -- -- (277) Minority interests............ -- -- (816) -- -- (746) -- -- (642) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total Property-Casualty..... 43,294 55,556 7,207 42,137 48,770 2,364 38,382 45,197 3,262 Life/Health Germany....................... 12,234 21,247 137 11,660 19,809 127 11,681 21,662 583 Rest of Europe................ 5,181 10,903 (95) 5,486 10,430 381 5,751 11,866 910 Rest of World................. 3,251 4,388 (24) 3,010 3,856 (49) 2,818 3,724 (71) Consolidation adjustments(3).............. (3) (2) (2) (11) (3) -- (11) (1) (2) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Subtotal.................... 20,663 36,536 16 20,145 34,092 459 20,239 37,251 1,420 Amortization of goodwill...... -- -- (174) -- -- (146) -- -- (137) Minority interests............ -- -- 177 -- -- (84) -- -- (658) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total Life/Health........... 20,663 36,536 19 20,145 34,092 229 20,239 37,251 625 Banking(4) Operations.................... -- 21,275 (1,142) -- 12,755 303 -- 1,722 183 Amortization of goodwill...... -- -- (241) -- -- (70) -- -- 8 Minority interests............ -- -- 25 -- -- (453) -- -- (90) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total Banking............... -- 21,275 (1,358)(5) -- 12,755 (220) -- 1,722 101 Asset Management Operations.................... -- 3,185 202 -- 2,738 77 -- 1,722 138 Amortization of goodwill...... -- -- (377) -- -- (243) -- -- (89) Minority interests............ -- -- (230) -- -- (182) -- -- (136) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total Asset Management...... -- 3,185 (405) -- 2,738 (348) -- 1,722 (87) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Subtotal........................ 63,957 116,552 5,463 62,282 98,355 2,025 58,621 85,892 3,901 Consolidation adjustments(6).... (804) (8,876) (6,630) (694) (2,705) (402) (736) (2,103) (441) ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total........................... 63,153 107,676 (1,167) 61,588 95,650 1,623 57,885 83,789 3,460 ====== ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ===== --------------- (1) Represents premiums written for both direct business and reinsurance assumed between Group companies in different countries and segments, as well as from third parties. Our gross premiums written in respect of reinsurance assumed from Group companies are eliminated in consolidation. (2) Includes significant investment related results. See "-- Property-Casualty Insurance Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Net Income." 23 (3) Represents elimination of intercompany transactions between Group companies in different geographic regions. (4) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements for the full twelve months of 2002, compared to 2001, where Dresdner Bank was consolidated only from July 23, 2001, the date of acquisition. (5) Includes a realized gain of E1,912 million resulting from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. See "-- Banking Operations." The gain on this transfer was eliminated at the Group level. In addition, this item includes a realized gain of E224 million resulting from the merger of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo in August 2002. See "Banking Operations -- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." (6) Represents elimination of intercompany transactions between Group companies in different segments. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS At the end of the first quarter of 2003, the Institutional Restructuring Unit (or IRU) within our banking segment included approximately E31 billion, consisting of approximately E22 billion of loans (including approximately E7 billion of non-performing loans and approximately E1 billion of potential problem loans) and approximately E1 billion of other non-strategic assets, including private equity investments, and approximately E8 billion of undrawn commitments. As of June 24, 2003, the IRU had disposed of approximately E3 billion of loans by means of securitization transactions. On June 27, 2003, a subsidiary of Allianz received notice from the former parent company of PIMCO that such former parent company of PIMCO had exercised its right to put an additional US$250 million of its remaining ownership interest in PIMCO to Allianz as of June 30, 2003, with payment therefor due by July 30, 2003. For additional information, see "-- Asset Management Operations -- Result of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Net income." On July 10, 2003 we announced our intention to redeem a first tranche of approximately 50% of our index-linked exchangeable bonds (MILES) ahead of schedule, using Munich Re shares. This transaction, when completed, will reduce our shareholding in Munich Re by approximately 3%. FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Our results of operations are affected by demographics (particularly with respect to life insurance) and by a variety of market conditions, including economic cycles, insurance industry cycles (particularly with respect to property-casualty insurance) and fluctuations in interest rates. We believe that the impact of these factors will continue to affect our results of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately 36.7% of our gross premiums were derived from our German operations. As a result, economic, demographic and market developments in Germany have materially impacted and can be expected to continue to materially impact our results. In addition, fluctuations in exchange rates in non-euro zone countries in which we do business affect our euro-denominated reported results. See "-- Exchange Rates." Our German net income includes investment income and realized capital gains on the substantial equity portfolio held at Allianz AG, which is part of our German property-casualty segment. GENERAL MARKET CONDITIONS Property-Casualty. Conditions in the property-casualty insurance markets in which we operate are generally characterized by periods of price competition, fluctuations in underwriting 24 results and the occurrence of unpredictable weather-related and other catastrophe losses. In recent years, the commercial and industrial property-casualty markets in which we operate have also been characterized by generally lower customer demand and a growing trend towards higher retention levels and the use of self-insurance mechanisms by insureds. During this same period in Europe, our automobile insurance business lines have been characterized by increased competition. We have succeeded in achieving substantial rate increases in the majority of our primary property-casualty markets in 2002. In addition, the underwriting results of our property-casualty operations are significantly influenced by estimates of property-casualty loss reserves, which are an accumulation of the estimated amounts necessary to settle all outstanding claims as of a particular reporting date. In recent years, our U.S. property-casualty loss reserves have shown cumulative deficiencies, primarily as a result of claims related to environmental and asbestos exposures. See "Risk Factors -- Claims reserves for our property and casualty insurance and reinsurance policies are based on future estimates which if not correct could materially adversely affect earnings," as well as "-- Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves" for a discussion of our property-casualty reserves on a consolidated Group basis under IFRS, and on an individual country basis under local accounting rules. Prior to March 31, 2003, our most significant associated enterprise was Munich Re, one of the world's largest reinsurers. To the extent loss reserve development (favorable or unfavorable) impacted Munich Re's results, it was also reflected in our results on an equity basis. Effective March 31, 2003, however, we reduced our shareholding in Munich Re to less than 20%. As a result of this reduction, we ceased to account for Munich Re as an associated enterprise at March 31, 2003. Accordingly, the treatment of Munich Re in our financial statements after March 31, 2003 will not be comparable to that of prior periods. Life/Health. Demographic studies suggest that over the next decade there will be growth in our principal life insurance markets of Germany, France, Italy and the rest of Europe and the United States in the number of individuals who enter the age group that we believe is most likely to purchase retirement-oriented life insurance products. In addition, in a number of our European markets, including Germany, retirement, medical and other social benefits previously provided by the government have been or are expected to be curtailed in the coming years. We believe that these trends will increase opportunities for private sector providers of life insurance, health, pension and other social benefits-related insurance products. We believe that our distribution networks, the quality and diversity of our products and our investment management expertise in each of these markets position us to benefit from such developments. Banking. Conditions in the banking market in which we operate, particularly in Europe, are generally characterized by intense competition and low profit margins. In 2002, the downturn in global equity markets, declining transaction volumes and increasing levels of default by both corporate and individual borrowers combined to result in significant net losses in our banking segment. Nonetheless, the sale of life insurance and retirement savings products through our bank branches increased in 2002, particularly in our core markets of Germany, Italy and France. We believe that bancassurance will be an increasingly important distribution channel for all of our business segments in the years to come. Asset Management. Prior to 2001, our asset management segment had generally benefited from favorable market conditions, including falling interest rates and generally strong capital markets conditions in Europe and the United States, marked by intermittent periods of extreme volatility. In 2001 and 2002, the downturn in the global equity markets, together with the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, had a significant negative impact on our asset management operations, resulting in widespread price declines in equity securities and transaction volumes and increased uncertainty on the part of many third-party investors. We cannot predict how long the downturn in the capital markets will last or what its long-term effect on investor confidence 25 will be. While the assets under management in our asset management segment include a significant amount of funds related to affiliated Allianz Group insurance operations, a growing portion of our assets under management, particularly following our acquisitions of PIMCO in May 2000, Nicholas-Applegate in January 2001 and Dresdner Bank in July 2001, represents third-party funds. EXCHANGE RATES We publish our consolidated financial statements in euros. A significant portion of our revenues and expenses from our subsidiaries outside the euro zone, including in the United States, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, originates in currencies other than the euro. As a result, we have a financial reporting translation exposure attributable to fluctuations in the values of these currencies against the euro. The impact of these fluctuations in exchange rates is mitigated by the fact that our non-euro revenues and related expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, are generally denominated in the same currencies. See "-- Risk Management" for a discussion of our management of foreign exchange rate-related risks as well as "Risk Factors -- Changes in value relative to the euro or non-euro zone currencies in which we generate revenues and incurs expenses could adversely affect our reported earnings and cash flow." CONSOLIDATION DIFFERENCES Our reported segment results in 2002 were significantly affected by intercompany transactions, including the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to Allianz Dresdner Asset Management GmbH (or ADAM) (see "-- Banking Operations") and transfers of investment securities in connection with the repositioning of certain shareholdings within the Group (see "-- Insurance Operations" and "-- Banking Operations"). The gains and losses on these transfers were eliminated at the Group level. In addition, our 2002 results reflect the consolidation of Dresdner Bank for the full twelve months of 2002, compared to 2001, where Dresdner Bank was consolidated only from July 23, 2001, the date of the acquisition. On August 1, 2002, we deconsolidated the assets and liabilities of our former mortgage banking subsidiary, Deutsche Hyp. See "-- Banking Operations -- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." Prior to March 31, 2003, our most significant associated enterprise was Munich Re, one of the world's largest reinsurers. To the extent loss reserve development (favorable or unfavorable) impacted Munich Re's results, it was also reflected in our results on an equity basis. Effective March 31, 2003, however, we reduced our shareholding in Munich Re to less than 20%. As a result of this reduction, we ceased to account for Munich Re as an associated enterprise at March 31, 2003. Accordingly, the treatment of Munich Re in our financial statements after March 31, 2003 will not be comparable to that of prior periods. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES We have identified the accounting policies that are critical to our business operations and the understanding of its results of operations. These critical accounting policies are those which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments, and relate to insurance reserves, loan loss allowances, the determination of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities (including impairment charges), goodwill and deferred tax assets and off-balance sheet arrangements. In each case, the determination of these items is fundamental to our financial position and results of operations, and requires management to make complex judgments based on information and financial data that may change in future periods. As a result, determinations regarding these items necessarily involve the use of assumptions and subjective judgments as to future events and are subject to change, and the use of different assumptions or data could produce materially different results. 26 INSURANCE RESERVES Our insurance reserves represent estimates of future payouts that we will make in respect of property-casualty and life/health insurance claims, including expenses relating to such claims. Such estimates are made on a case-by-case basis, based on the facts known to us at the time reserves are established, and are periodically adjusted to recognize the estimated ultimate cost of a claim. In addition, we establish so-called IBNR reserves in our property-casualty business to recognize the estimated cost of losses that have occurred but of which we do not yet have notice. When actual claims experience differs from our previous estimates, the resulting difference will generally be reflected in our reported results for the period of the change in estimate. In each case, the establishment of our insurance reserves is an inherently uncertain process, involving assumptions as to factors such as court decisions, changes in laws, social, economic and demographic trends, inflation and other factors affecting claim costs, and, in our life/health insurance business, assumptions concerning mortality and morbidity trends. In recent years, our property-casualty insurance reserves in the United States have been significantly impacted by claims relating to asbestos and environmental exposures. For a further discussion of our property-casualty insurance reserves, including an additional E762 million in asbestos and environmental reserves taken in 2002, see "-- Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves," as well as "-- Property-Casualty Loss Reserves" and "Risk Factors -- Claims reserves for our property-casualty insurance and reinsurance policies are based on estimates as to future claims liabilities. In 2002, we made significant additional reserves relating to asbestos-related and environmental claims in the United States and in connection with discontinued and run-off businesses. Further adverse developments relating to claims could lead to further reserve additions and adversely impact our results of operations." LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCES Our loan loss allowances represent management's estimate of the probable credit losses in our loan portfolio. Allowances are established on a case-by-case basis, are updated over time, and are described at greater length under "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations." Judgments concerning the timing and level of our loan loss allowances are based on numerous estimates and judgments, including determinations concerning borrower creditworthiness, contractual loan terms and available judicial and other remedies. Allowances for counterparty risk are established against individual exposures and are subject to periodic management review. Specific loan loss allowances are recorded if it is probable that the borrower will not repay principal and/or interest according to the contractually agreed terms. Individually impaired loans are measured on the basis of the present value of expected cashflows and take into consideration the borrower's financial position, the contractual terms of the loan and the value of collateral if any. In 2002, our banking operations' recorded additional net loan loss provisions of E2,222 million. See "-- Banking Operations -- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Loan Loss Provisions" as well as "Risk Factors -- We have significant counterparty risk exposure" and "Risk Factors -- Dresdner Bank continues to experience significant loan losses relating to problem loans." General loss allowances are established to provide for incurred but unidentified losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio at the relevant balance sheet date. The general loan loss allowance is reviewed in the light of general economic conditions, the size and diversity of the portfolio and historical default rates. Country risk allowances are established for transfer risk, which is a measure of the likely ability of a borrower in a certain country to repay its foreign currency-denominated debt in light of the impact of currency devaluations, macroeconomic or political developments in that country. Country risk allowances are based on country ratings that incorporate current and historical economic, political and other data to categorize countries by risk profile. 27 When we determine that a loan is uncollectible, the loan is charged off against any existing specific loss allowance or directly recognized as expense in the income statement. Changes in judgments, analyses and the methodologies we utilize may lead to changes over time in the level and timing of the allowances we establish and related charge-offs, which may in turn materially impact the results of our banking segment. In 2002, our banking segment's gross charge-offs were E1,889 million. FAIR VALUES AND IMPAIRMENTS A portion of our assets and liabilities is recorded at fair value, including trading assets and liabilities, and securities available for sale. Fair value determinations for financial assets and liabilities are based generally on listed market prices or broker or dealer price quotations. If prices are not readily determinable, fair value is based on either internal valuation models or management's estimate of amounts that could be realized under current market conditions. Fair values of certain financial instruments, including OTC derivative instruments, are determined using pricing models that consider, among other factors, contractual and market prices, correlations, time value, credit, yield curve volatility factors and/or prepayment rates of the underlying positions. The use of different pricing models and assumptions could lead to different estimates of fair value. Financial assets are reviewed regularly for impairments, and valuation writedowns to fair value are charged to income if an other than temporary diminution in value occurs. Determinations concerning an other than temporary diminution involve judgments concerning market conditions, issuers' financial positions and other factors. We generally consider an other than temporary diminution to have occurred upon a decline of 20% or greater from book value over a period in excess of six consecutive months. For a discussion of impairment charges taken in 2002, see "-- Investment Portfolio Impairments and Unrealized Losses," "Risk Factors -- Our investment portfolio is significantly exposed to equity securities. Market risks could impair this portfolio and adversely impact our financial position and results of operations," and "Risk Factors -- Market factors, as well as a lack of improvement in our operating performance, may adversely affect the levels of deferred acquisition costs, goodwill and deferred tax assets we maintain on our balance sheet; the deferred tax assets we maintain are also potentially impacted by changes in German tax legislation." OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS Off-balance sheet arrangements that we enter into in our investment and banking activities include securitization and other transactions involving special- or limited-purpose entities (or SPEs), credit lines and loan commitments. Off-balance-sheet arrangements we enter into in our insurance business also include letter of credit (or LOC) transactions where we provide LOC coverage for all or part of our obligations to insureds or other customers, or where similar coverage is provided to us by reinsurers or other counterparties, in each case in accordance with applicable credit or regulatory requirements. Off-balance sheet transactions may be carried out with or through a variety of unconsolidated SPEs. In our insurance and reinsurance businesses, we have entered into reinsurance transactions with SPEs which provide us with long-term reinsurance coverage and were funded through the issuance of so-called "catastrophe bonds" to third-party investors. In our banking business, we have established SPEs in order to provide administrative services, engage in underwriting activities, enter into derivative transactions, provide liquidity and overdraft facilities and guarantees, securitize financial assets we hold, reduce credit risks on our loan portfolios, and provide alternative financing structures and investment products for our customers. Material exposures related to the transactions are recorded or disclosed in our consolidated financial statements. Risks associated with establishing SPEs and transactions entered into with SPEs are reviewed in the banking operations risk management process. 28 In the context of the "Silver Tower" asset-backed program of Dresdner Bank, in which third-party receivables and receivables of Dresdner Bank Group are securitized, and which is refinanced by commercial paper, Dresdner Bank has granted short-term credit lines in the amount of E10.2 billion in the event that a refinancing through commercial paper is not possible. As of June 18, 2003, E4 billion of such credit lines had been used for refinancing instead of the placement of commercial paper. The risk exists that Dresdner Bank would be required to use its own credit lines by up to further E7 billion, which would accordingly raise its regulatory risk-weighted assets. ACCOUNTING DIFFERENCES During 2002, we reduced the time lag in accounting for all material investments in associates to a period of no more than three months for IFRS. We accounted for this reduction by recording the income and equity changes occurring during the catch-up period (i.e., the period from June 30, 2001 to September 30, 2001), less any amounts already reflected in fiscal 2001 due to their significance, directly in shareholders' equity. The amount of income directly recorded in shareholders' equity in 2002 was E131 million. The impact of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 on the financial results of Munich Re, our most significant associate, was considered in our 2001 income statement and statement of shareholders' equity in light of the significance and relevance of this impact to our 2001 consolidated financial statements. On January 1, 2001, we adopted IAS 39, Financial instruments: recognition and measurement, and IAS 40, Investment property. IAS 39 sets forth requirements for the recognition in financial statements and valuation of the financial assets and liabilities of an enterprise, including the reporting of hedging instruments, and relating to additional disclosure. Under this standard, all financial assets and liabilities, including all derivatives, are initially recognized on the balance sheet at cost. Subsequent to initial recognition, all financial assets are re-measured to fair value, with the exception of certain assets and liabilities listed in the standard. This standard does not apply to rights and obligations arising under insurance contracts. The effect of the first-time recognition under IAS 39 of the market values of derivatives that have until now not been shown in the balance sheet have been recorded in the beginning balance of shareholders' equity. This reduced revenue reserves by E153 million. IAS 40 covers investment property independent of the main activity of the enterprise concerned. Investment property is real estate held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation. IAS 40 does not apply to real estate held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes. The standard allows an enterprise to choose either a fair value model or a cost model for valuation purposes. We have chosen the acquisition cost method, which is consistent with our previous accounting policy. First-time application of IAS 40 has resulted only in changes in presentation. For more information on accounting changes, see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Our total income increased by E12,026 million, or 12.6%, to E107,676 million in 2002 from E95,650 million in 2001, due primarily to the full-year consolidation of Dresdner Bank in 2002, offset in part by the effects of weakness in the capital markets and the global economy, which affected all of our operating segments and our banking segment in particular. Our earnings from ordinary activities before taxation decreased by E3,041 million, or 166.4%, to a loss of 29 E1,214 million in 2002 from income of E1,827 million in 2001. We had a consolidated tax benefit of E735 million in 2002 and a consolidated tax benefit of E840 million in 2001, representing overall effective tax rates of (62.8)% and (52.1)%, respectively, compared to statutory rates for our primary German and other operating subsidiaries that ranged from 12.5% to 45.5% and averaged 32.5%. The consolidated tax benefit in 2002 was due primarily to tax losses, for which a deferred tax asset was recognized. Net income decreased E2,790 million, or 171.9%, to a loss of E1,167 million in 2002, compared to income of E1,623 million in 2001, reflecting primarily weakness in the capital markets and the global economy, offset in part by the tax benefit discussed above. This weakness was particularly evident in writedowns of available for sale investments, which increased significantly to E5,523 million in 2002. In our banking segment, earnings were negatively affected by additional net loan loss provisions of E2,222 million. Our property-casualty insurance business was negatively impacted by significant claims, including primarily E762 million relating to asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures at Fireman's Fund and E710 million in net claims relating to severe floods that struck Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in July and August 2002. These negative effects in our property-casualty segment were offset in part by significant investment-related gains and rate increases in most of our major property-casualty markets. The following table sets forth the percentage changes for 2002 over 2001 in our total income, total expenses and net income by segment, which are discussed in greater detail below, and for the Group as a whole. Changes in results in our banking and asset management segments related primarily to the full-year consolidation of Dresdner Bank in 2002. Percentage changes for 2002 over 2001 for our banking segment, which we established as a separate segment in 2001, reflect the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001 and are therefore not comparable. See "-- Banking Operations." % CHANGE 2002/2001 ------------------------------------------ TOTAL INCOME TOTAL EXPENSES NET INCOME ------------ -------------- ---------- Property-Casualty.................................... 13.9 % 3.5 % 204.9 % Life/Health.......................................... 7.2 % 8.8 % (91.7)% Banking.............................................. 66.8 % 82.1 % (517.3)% Asset Management..................................... 16.3 % 11.3 % (16.4)% Consolidated Group................................... 12.6 % 16.1 % (171.9)% YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Our total income increased E11.861 million, or 14.2%, to E95,650 million in 2001 from E83,789 million in 2000, due primarily to the acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001, together with increases in property-casualty insurance, offset in part by a decrease in life/health insurance. Despite the increase in total income, our earnings from ordinary activities before taxation decreased by E3,086 million, or 62.8%, to E1,827 million in 2001 from E4,913 million in 2000, reflecting primarily the effects of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 in the United States and weakness in the capital markets. On a consolidated Group basis, the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 resulted in net claims costs of approximately E1.5 billion. As a result of the weakness in the capital markets, earnings were also negatively affected by E1.6 billion of investment writedowns. We had a consolidated tax benefit of E840 million in 2001 and a consolidated tax expense of E176 million in 2000, representing overall effective tax rates of (52.1)% and 2.8% respectively, compared to statutory rates for our primary German and other operating subsidiaries that ranged from 10.0% to 43.0%, and averaged 19.2%. The consolidated tax benefit in 2001 was due to a substantial amount of tax losses resulting primarily from claims related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the United States, together with a significant amount of tax-exempt realized gains on investments. 30 Net income decreased E1,837 million, or 53.1%, to E1,623 million in 2001, compared to E3,460 million in 2000, reflecting primarily the impact of the special adjustment to income taxes in 2000, the effects of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 in the United States and weakness in the capital markets, offset in part by the tax benefit discussed above. The following table sets forth the percentage changes for 2001 over 2000 in our total income, total expenses and net income by segment, which are discussed in greater detail below, and for the Group as a whole. Results in our banking and asset management segments reflected primarily the acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001. Percentage changes for 2001 over 2000 for our banking segment, which we established as a separate segment in 2001, are based on the results for 2000 of the banking operations of the Allianz Group, which we reported in 2000 and prior years together with asset management as part of our financial services segment and are therefore not comparable. See "-- Asset Management Operations" and "-- Banking Operations." % CHANGE 2001/2000 ------------------------------------------ TOTAL INCOME TOTAL EXPENSES NET INCOME ------------ -------------- ---------- Property-Casualty.................................... 8.2 % 12.6 % (27.5)% Life/Health.......................................... (8.2)% (5.2)% (63.4)% Banking.............................................. 645.7 % 689.4 % (317.8)% Asset Management..................................... 59.0 % 83.2 % (300.0)% Consolidated Group................................... 14.5 % 19.3 % (53.1)% CONSOLIDATED ASSETS AND LIABILITIES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Total assets decreased by E90,869 million, or 9.6%, to E852,056 million at December 31, 2002, from E942,925 million at December 31, 2001, primarily as a result of the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp and price declines in the capital markets. Our own investments (including loans and advances in our banking segment) decreased by E88,505 million, or 11.3%, to E696,433 million in 2002 from E784,938 million in 2001, while separate account assets increased by E965 million, or 3.9%, to E25,657 million at December 31, 2002, from E24,692 million at December 31, 2001. Insurance investments (excluding separate account assets) increased by E8,442 million, or 2.4%, to E362,577 million in 2002 from E354,135 million in 2001. Our shareholders' equity decreased by 31.2% to E21,772 million at December 31, 2002 compared to E31,664 million at December 31, 2001. This decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in net unrealized gains of E7,198 million from E8,276 million at December 31, 2001 to E1,049 million (adjusted for currency translation) at December 31, 2002, reflecting generally adverse conditions in the capital markets. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Total assets increased by E502,930 million, or 114.3%, to E942,925 million at December 31, 2001, from E439,995 million at December 31, 2000, primarily as a result of our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001. Our own investments grew by E456,813 million, or 139.2%, to E784,938 million in 2001 from E328,125 million in 2000, while separate account assets increased E1,922 million, or 8.4%, to E24,692 million at December 31, 2001, from E22,770 million at December 31, 2000. Insurance investments grew by E19,066 million, or 5.7%, to E354,135 million in 2001 from E335,069 million in 2000. Our shareholders' equity decreased by 11.1% to E31,664 million at December 31, 2001 compared to E35,603 million at December 31, 2000. This decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in net unrealized gains of E5,210 million in 2001. 31 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO IMPAIRMENTS AND UNREALIZED LOSSES VALUATION OF SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE All investments in our investment portfolio are subject to regular impairment reviews. Generally, the carrying value of our investments is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairments are measured as the difference between the acquisition cost of a particular investment and the expected recoverable amount (generally market value). Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value, and are reviewed regularly for impairments. Valuation write-downs to fair value are charged to income if an other than temporary diminution in value occurs. As of the closing date for each quarter and year end, we identify on a Group-wide basis all securities whose market values are other than temporarily below acquisition cost based on our policy guidelines. Fair value determinations for financial assets and liabilities are based generally on listed market prices or broker or dealer price quotations. FIXED INCOME SECURITIES Fixed income securities are written down if one or more of the following factors indicate that repayment of the principal can no longer be expected in light of the intended holding period: - the issuer's or counterparty's financial condition deteriorates, evidenced by a variety of circumstances, including the fact that creditors grant special conditions or concessions that they would not otherwise grant, disappearance of an active market for the investment, or actual or impending bankruptcy; - disappearance of an active market for the security due to the issuer's financial difficulties; - default or delay in interest service or repayment of principal; - in the case of asset-backed securities, a pattern indicates that the entire amount of a portfolio of accounts receivable or other assets may not be collected; or - Group management no longer has the intent and ability to hold the security through the anticipated recovery period. We analyze fixed income assets for impairment if any of the following occurs: - rating agency downgrade below investment grade; - fair value declines significantly below cost; - change in conditions in the issuer's or counterparty's industry, business segment or geographic area; or - change in recommendations of investment advisors or market analysts. Generally, we do not consider fixed income instruments impaired if the decline in value is caused solely by changes in interest rates. EQUITY INVESTMENTS Equity investments categorized as securities available for sale are valued at market value. Other Than Temporary Declines in Market Value. We record an impairment loss if a decline in the market value of an equity security is other than temporary. In 2001, we generally considered a decline in market value in an equity security classified as available for sale to be other than temporary if the market value of the security was continuously for a period of more than six months more than 30% below both the weighted average acquisition cost of the individual Group company that held the security and the Group's weighted average acquisition cost. In these instances we recorded an impairment on equity securities held by Group companies that were in an unrealized loss position. In 2002, we modified our policy and generally considered a decline to be other than temporary if the market value was continuously for a period of more than six months 20% or more below both the weighted average acquisition cost 32 of the individual Group company that held the security and the Group's weighted average acquisition cost. Additional Factors. In addition, we record an impairment on our available for sale securities if one or more of the following factors indicate that the cost of the investment may not be recovered in light of the intended holding period: - the issuer's financial condition deteriorates, evidenced by a variety of circumstances, including disappearance of an active market for the investment, or actual or impending bankruptcy; - the issuer is adversely affected by significant developments in its business environment; or - the market value of an investment has declined more than 80% below an individual Group company's acquisition cost as of the end of any fiscal quarter. If any of the following occurs, we analyze the investment for impairment in greater detail: - change in recommendations of investment advisors or market analysts; - significant developments or events in the issuer's business conditions and environment; - decline in the issuer's P/E ratio; - losses recently incurred by the issuer; - changes in the issuer's dividend policy. Management Judgment Analysis. If the criteria mentioned above indicate an impairment but recovery of the acquisition cost is still expected in the medium term, the decrease in value may still be considered temporary based on management's judgment, provided we have the intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value. The following information is required to support any decision not to record an impairment in such cases: - relative performance of the investment compared to benchmarks indicate that the decrease in value is attributable to industry or market conditions, rather than issuer-specific problems; - positive evaluations of market analysts; - historical share price development and volatility in share prices indicate that acquisition cost may be recovered in the near future; or - specific intentions and ability to hold the investment exist. A decision based on management judgment has to follow these guidelines, must be supported by full documentations and is required to be updated at regular intervals. The evaluation includes other factors, such trends in stock market performance, the extent to which the fair value is below the acquisition price and the period of time for which unrealized losses have existed. To ensure consistency, decisions based on management judgment may only be taken at the Group level and not by any of the Group's subsidiary operating entities. Private Equity Investments. The IFRS carrying value of the Group's available for sale private equity investments was E1,723 million at December 31, 2002 and E1,959 million at December 31, 2001. Direct private equity investments, which are primarily non-traded securities, are generally carried by the Allianz Group at cost. The Group tests private equity investments for impairment on a quarterly basis, generally on the basis of financial measures such as EBITDA and EBIT or price to earnings ratios. If appropriate, discounted cash models or leveraged buyout models are applied. Information from publicly available reports of the Group's private equity investees is also 33 taken into account. If a decline in the fair value of a private equity investment is determined to be other than temporary, the investment is considered to be impaired. A significant portion of the Group's available for sale private equity investments was held at Dresdner Bank (E980 million at December 31, 2002 and E1,140 million at December 31, 2001). Dresdner Bank records an impairment loss on such investments if a decline in the value of the investment is determined to be other than temporary. Dresdner Bank generally considers a decline to be other than temporary if the market value was 20% or more below acquisition cost over a period of six months. Investments in Funds. The Group's valuation of investments in funds, or funds of funds, relies primarily on information relating to net asset value provided by the general partners of such funds. If a decline in the net asset value of a fund of funds is determined to be other than temporary, the investment is considered to be impaired. Additional factors not reflected in the net asset value of a fund of funds may also be taken into account in making impairment determinations. VALUATIONS OF SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY The fair value of individual securities held to maturity can fall temporarily below their carrying value, but, provided there is no risk resulting from changes in financial standing, such securities are not written-down in value. Impairment charges on securities held to maturity totaled E31 million in 2002 and E35 million in 2001. IMPAIRMENT CHARGES For the year ended December 31, 2002, other expenses for investments totaled E14,102 million, of which E8,204 related to realized losses and E5,898 related to depreciation and write-downs. Of the total amount of realized losses in 2002, E8,063 million related to securities available for sale, E4 million to securities held to maturity, E131 million to real estate used by third parties and E6 million to other investments. Of the amount related to depreciation and write-downs, E5,523 million was attributable to securities available for sale, E31 million to securities held to maturity, E333 million to real estate used by third parties (including scheduled depreciation) and E11 million to other investments. In 2002, we recorded E4,953 million of write-downs related to equity securities, E345 million related to corporate bonds and E202 million related to government bonds. For the year ended December 31, 2001, other expenses for investments totaled E8,923 million, of which E6,998 million were attributable to realized losses and E1,925 million resulted from depreciation and write-downs. Realized losses for securities available for sale were E6,888 million, for securities held to maturity E12 million, for real estate used by third parties E19 million, and for other investments E79 million. Of the total amount for depreciation and write-downs, E1,507 million related to securities available for sale, E35 million to securities held to maturity, E378 million to real estate used by third parties (including scheduled depreciation) and E5 million to other investments. In 2001, we recorded E1,201 million of write-downs related to equity securities, E170 million related to corporate bonds and E103 million related to government bonds. UNREALIZED LOSSES As of December 31, 2002, unrealized losses from securities available for sale totaled E12,752 million, of which E11,833 million were attributable to equity securities, E472 million to corporate bonds and E426 million to government bonds. As of December 31, 2001, we recorded a total of E9,656 million unrealized losses. Of this amount, E7,700 million related to equity securities, E1,195 to government bonds and E710 to corporate bonds. The gross amount of unrealized losses that would have been recognized as impairments based on our current policies but for the application of management judgments (i.e., unrecognized impairment losses) was E261 million and E764 million at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002, respectively. On a net basis, after policyholder participation and minority interests, these amounts were E145 million 34 and E267 million, respectively. All of the foregoing unrecognized impairment losses arose in respect of our equity holdings. In determining such amounts, we have utilized the Group's average acquisition cost of such securities as determined on a quarterly basis. Of the gross unrecognized impairment losses attributable to equity securities as of December 31, 2001, E261 million related to our positions in five equity securities in the telecom and technology sector, in which we considered the decline in market values to be only temporary even though market prices were 30% or more below the Group's average acquisition cost in the second half of 2001. The approach reflected a decision based on management's judgment in light of independent research analysis. There were gross unrealized losses of E764 million as of December 31, 2002 relating to positions in nine equity securities for which we did not record impairments although they were 20% or more below the Group's average acquisition cost for the period between July 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002. As a result of the assessment of each individual stock, we determined that the current unrealized losses in these nine investment positions were only temporary. All of these nine equity securities were attributable to investment-grade issuers and none to non-investment grade companies. Of the nine investment positions, four related to the telecom industry, with aggregate gross unrealized loss of E218 million. Three investment positions related to technology companies with aggregate gross unrealized loss of E424 million. The two remaining positions were in the utilities sector (gross unrealized loss of E28 million) and in a financial institution (gross unrealized loss of E94 million). For U.S. GAAP purposes, we recorded an impairment charge of E324 million before tax and minority interest with respect to these nine securities. See Note 45 to our consolidated financial statements. The following table sets forth further details regarding the duration and amount below cost of the Group's unrealized loss positions for equity securities, excluding the nine securities referred to above, as of December 31, 2002. AGEING TABLE: DURATION AND AMOUNT OF UNREALIZED LOSSES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002 0 TO 6 MONTHS 6 TO 12 MONTHS 12 TO 18 MONTHS GREATER THAN 18 MONTHS TOTAL ------------- -------------- --------------- ---------------------- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Market Value.......... 21,948 7,603 513 211 30,274 Cost.................. 27,495 11,118 718 247 39,577 Unrealized Loss....... (5,547) (3,515) (205) (36) (9,303) LESS THAN 20% 20% TO 50% GREATER THAN 50% TOTAL ------------- ---------- ---------------- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Market Value.......... 18,414 11,432 428 30,274 Cost.................. 21,957 16,658 962 39,577 Unrealized Loss....... (3,543) (5,226) (534) (9,303) Although all individual securities were reviewed to ensure that no material impairments or other than temporary losses were required to be charged to income in 2002, the identification of impairment and other then temporary losses and the determination of the recoverable amount are an inherently uncertain process involving various assumptions and factors, including the financial condition of the issuer, expected future cash flows, observable market prices and expected net selling prices. Further developments after December 31, 2002 may indicate that certain unrealized losses that existed as of December 31, 2002 will need to be considered other than temporary, resulting in a negative impact on our profit and loss account. However, the net income effect of any charges would be decreased by the allocation of a portion of such charges to policyholder participation and minority interests. Determinations relating to unrealized losses and impairments in our investment positions, including decisions based on management judgment, are made on the basis of an assessment of 35 each individual investment position. We accordingly do not believe that such determinations have an impact on other material investments held. DISCUSSION OF OPERATIONS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT INSURANCE OPERATIONS We provide property-casualty and life/health products and services on an individual and group basis in more than 70 countries worldwide. In our property-casualty business, we provide, among other things, automobile, homeowners, travel and other personal lines products and are a leading provider of commercial and industrial coverages to business enterprises of all sizes, including many of the world's largest companies. Our life/health insurance businesses provide endowment, annuity and term insurance products and a wide range of health, disability and related coverages to individual insureds, as well as group life, group health and pension products to employers. In addition to strong local positions, we have established leading positions in certain specialty lines on a global basis, including credit insurance, marine and aviation insurance, industrial reinsurance through Allianz Global Risks, and travel and assistance insurance. Our products are marketed in Germany primarily under the "Allianz" brand name. In other countries we generally operate through our subsidiary insurers' brand names, which are identified as part of the Allianz Group. We believe that our brand name is one of the best-known and most highly respected in the German marketplace, combining a reputation for excellent customer service with an image of superior financial strength. Our philosophy is to provide considerable latitude to our operating entities in product design, underwriting, distribution, marketing and operations while providing various levels of centralized support in such areas as financial and strategic planning, investment management, knowledge transfer, accounting and reinsurance to our subsidiaries from our headquarters in Munich. We refer to this combination of centralized strategic management and local business autonomy as a "multi-local" approach to our global insurance business. We believe that this gives our subsidiary operations the flexibility to best respond to local market conditions and allows us to implement strategic goals and create incentives for our employees on a country-by-country basis. 36 PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE OPERATIONS The following table sets forth certain financial information for our property-casualty operations for the years indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------- ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Gross premiums written...................................... 43,294 42,137 38,382 Premiums earned(net)(1)..................................... 36,458 34,428 31,529 Interest and similar income................................. 4,473 5,068 5,568 Income from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises.................................... 8,494(2) 889 1,833 Other income from investments............................... 3,652 4,307 4,259 Trading income.............................................. 207 1,451 (10) Fee and commission income, and income from service activities................................................ 521 1,425 940 Other income................................................ 1,751 1,202 1,078 ------- ------- ------- Total income......................................... 55,556 48,770 45,197 ------- ------- ------- Insurance benefits(net)(3).................................. (28,974) (28,200) (25,413) Interest and similar expenses............................... (1,564) (1,323) (1,136) Other expenses for investments.............................. (3,567) (2,888) (1,913) Loan loss allowance......................................... (7) (4) -- Acquisition costs and administrative expenses(4)............ (10,521) (10,042) (9,106) Amortization of goodwill.................................... (370) (349) (277) Other expenses.............................................. (2,999) (3,555) (3,453) ------- ------- ------- Total expenses....................................... (48,002) (46,361) (41,298) ------- ------- ------- Earnings from ordinary activities before taxation........... 7,554 2,409 3,899 Taxes....................................................... 469 701 5 Minority interests in earnings.............................. (816) (746) (642) ------- ------- ------- Net income.................................................. 7,207 2,364 3,262 ======= ======= ======= --------------- (1) Net of reinsurance ceded of E6,150 million, E6,669 million and E6,488 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. (2) Reflects realized gains of E1,886 million from open market sales of Munich Re shares and E713 million on the sale of a real estate subsidiary in Italy, as well as significant income from intercompany transactions, including realized gains of E3,332 million from the transfer of Munich Re shares from Allianz AG to Dresdner Bank and dividend income of E382 million from Dresdner Bank. The gains on these intercompany transactions were eliminated at the Group level. (3) Includes loss and loss adjustment expenses of E28,502 million, E27,919 million and E24,566 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. (4) Includes net underwriting costs of E10,015 million, E9,543 million and E8,548 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Our gross premiums written from property-casualty operations in 2002 increased by E1,157 million, or 2.7%, to E43,294 million from E42,137 million in 2001. Eliminating the effect of exchange rate movements and changes in the scope of consolidation, 37 which decreased 2002 gross premiums written by E246 million, gross premiums written increased by 3.2%. This increase came primarily as a result of rate increases in all of our major markets, offset in part by a more selective underwriting policy, particularly in our industrial reinsurance business and in the United States, but also in other major markets. Premiums Earned (Net). On a Group-wide basis, property-casualty net premiums earned in 2002 and 2001 reflected premiums ceded to reinsurers of E6,150 million and E6,669 million, respectively, resulting in overall retention levels of approximately 85.6% in 2002 and 83.8% in 2001. Net premiums earned increased by E2,030 million, or 5.9%, to E36,458 million in 2002 from E34,428 million in 2001, which exceeded the 2.7% increase in gross premiums written and reflected the increase in overall retention levels. Trading Income. Trading income from our property-casualty operations decreased by E1,244 million, to E207 million in 2002 from E1,451 million in 2001, due primarily to the decrease of E1,212 million in gains from certain derivative financial instruments. These gains relate to derivative financial instruments embedded in outstanding exchangeable bonds that do not qualify for hedge accounting and from forward contracts that are used to hedge investments. Gains or losses on such financial instruments arising from valuation at fair value are included in trading income. The decrease in 2002 reflected primarily long positions on index futures entered into in late 2001, which substantially offset the market value gains from outstanding short positions. We had entered into short positions on these index futures in connection with our issuance of certain exchangeable bonds in 2001 and prior years. See "-- Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000 -- Trading Income." Insurance Benefits (Net). Net insurance benefits for our worldwide property-casualty business, which consist of claims paid, changes in reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, changes in other reserves and expenses of premium refunds, increased by E774 million, or 2.7%, to E28,974 million in 2002 from E28,200 million in 2001. Of this amount in 2002, E762 million related to asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures at Fireman's Fund. An additional approximately E710 million was attributable to net claims relating to severe flooding in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in July and August 2002. The increase in net insurance benefits in 2002 followed on an already high level of net insurance benefits in 2001, which reflected claims from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. For additional information on reserve-strengthening measures at our U.S. property-casualty insurance subsidiaries, see "-- Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves -- Individual Country Reserves -- Gross Reserves -- United States." The following table sets forth net loss, expense and combined ratio information for our property-casualty operations by geographic region for the years 2002 and 2001: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------- REST OF REST OF SPECIALTY GERMANY EUROPE NAFTA WORLD LINES TOTAL ------- ------- ----- ------- --------- ----- Loss ratio(1).......................... 74.2% 76.8% 94.6% 74.5% 75.9% 78.2% Expense ratio(2)....................... 28.3% 24.6% 32.9% 28.1% 32.5% 27.5% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Combined ratio......................... 102.5% 101.4% 127.5% 102.6% 108.4% 105.7% YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 ------------------------------------------------------- REST OF REST OF SPECIALTY GERMANY EUROPE NAFTA WORLD LINES TOTAL ------- ------- ----- ------- --------- ----- Loss ratio(1).......................... 76.2% 80.3% 99.9% 72.8% 66.5% 81.1% Expense ratio(2)....................... 26.8% 26.2% 29.2% 32.9% 39.5% 27.7% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Combined ratio......................... 103.0% 106.5% 129.1% 105.7% 106.0% 108.8% --------------- (1) Represents ratio of total loss and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premium. (2) Represents ratio of net underwriting costs to net earned premium. 38 The overall decrease in the Group combined ratio to 105.7% in 2002 from 108.8% in 2001 reflects the decrease in the Group's loss ratio to 78.2% in 2002 from 81.1% in 2001. The Group loss ratio was affected primarily by improved loss ratios in the Group's reinsurance operations at Allianz AG and in many of the Group's major markets, reflecting rate increases, particularly in our automobile lines, and decreased claim frequency. These improvements were offset in part by increased net claims related to severe flooding in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in July and August 2002 and a series of other storms, asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures at Fireman's Fund and increased net claims in our credit insurance. Excluding the effect of the flooding-related claims and the asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures in 2002 and the effects of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in 2001, the Group loss ratio would have decreased to 74.2% in 2002 from 76.7% in 2001. The Group expense ratio was largely unchanged at 27.5% in 2002 compared to 27.7% in 2001. Increased expenses relating to the development of the distribution capacity in Germany were offset by increased operating efficiencies at other Group companies. Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses consist primarily of changes in deferred acquisition costs, administrative expenses, and net underwriting costs. Net underwriting costs of E10,015 million in 2002 increased E472 million, or 4.9%, over 2001 levels of E9,543 million, which slightly exceeded our property-casualty premium growth rate of 2.7% due primarily to reduced commission income from reinsurance business ceded, reflecting higher overall retention levels. The increased expenses were offset in part by increased operating efficiencies at Group companies and cost reduction measures. Net Income. Net income from property-casualty insurance operations in 2002 increased by E4,843 million, or 204.9%, to E7,207 million in 2002 compared with E2,364 million in 2001. The increase was due primarily to investment-related items, including realized gains of E1,886 million from open market sales of Munich Re shares, approximately E1,100 million from open market sales of Vodafone AG shares and E713 million on the sale of a real estate subsidiary in Italy, as well as realized gains from the sale of other shareholdings in the Group's German equity portfolio. The segment also recorded significant income from intercompany transactions, including realized gains of E3,332 million from the transfer of Munich Re shares from Allianz AG to Dresdner Bank, dividend income of E382 million from Dresdner Bank and E224 million from the sale of Vereinte Lebensversicherung AG from Vereinte Versicherung AG to Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG (or Allianz Leben). The gains on these intercompany transactions were eliminated at the Group level. These increases were offset in part by realized losses of E1,536 million and net investment writedowns of E1,737 million, reflecting weakness in the capital markets. Excluding these investment related items, net income from property-casualty operations in 2002 reflected significantly increased net insurance benefits, including primarily E762 million relating to asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures at Fireman's Fund and E710 million in net claims relating to severe flooding in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in July and August 2002, offset in part by the increase in net insurance premiums attributable to rate increases in most of our major markets. Amortization of goodwill was E370 million in 2002, an increase of E21 million, or 6.0%, from E349 million in 2001, largely as a result of the amortization of goodwill associated with our acquisition of additional shareholdings in Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG and Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG in June 2002. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Related Party Transactions -- Transactions with Munich Re." Minority interests in earnings increased to E816 million in 2002 from E746 million in 2001. 39 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Our gross premiums written from property-casualty operations in 2001 increased by E3,755 million, or 9.8%, to E42,137 million from E38,382 million in 2000. Eliminating the effect of exchange rate movements, which increased 2001 gross premiums written by E28 million, gross premiums written increased by 9.7%. This increase came as a result of increases in all of our geographic segments, particularly in Rest of Europe, due to growth in France and Italy, and in Germany as discussed below. Premiums Earned (Net). On a Group-wide basis, property-casualty net premiums earned in 2001 and 2000 reflected premiums ceded to reinsurers of E6,669 million and E6,488 million, respectively, resulting in overall retention levels of approximately 83.8% in 2001 and 82.9% in 2000. Net premiums earned increased by E2,899 million, or 9.2%, to E34,428 million in 2001 from E31,529 million in 2000, paralleling the 9.8% increase in gross premiums written. Trading Income. Trading income from property-casualty operations increased by E1,461 million, to E1,451 million in 2001 from a loss of E10 million in 2000, due primarily to gains on derivative financial instruments for which hedge accounting is not applied. These derivative financial instruments include embedded derivatives in exchangeable bonds issues and forward contracts that are used to hedge investments but do not qualify for hedge accounting. We issued two series of bonds in 2001 that were exchangeable in accordance with their terms into equity securities of other publicly traded companies in order to reduce our long-term shareholdings in those issuers. We entered into short forward contracts on shares of HypoVereinsbank in connection with our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in 2001. See "Related Parties -- Transactions with Munich Re -- Agreement in Principle." In 2001, we had outstanding four exchangeable bonds with a total notional amount of E5,777 million, which contained embedded short options on equity securities and equity indices that were required to be separated from the host debt instrument because the risks of the embedded derivatives were not clearly and closely related to that of the host instrument. In 2001, we recorded a market value gain of E880 million related to these embedded derivatives as a result of the decline in the market value of the underlying shares and indices covered by the short options. We also recorded market value gains of E571 million in 2001 on derivative financial instruments for which hedge accounting was not applied. These gains were primarily the result of market value gains on short forward contracts on equity securities of HypoVereinsbank due to declines in the market value of the underlying shares. The significant increase in trading income in 2001 compared with 2000 was primarily attributable to the fact that many of these derivative transactions were new in 2001. In addition, embedded derivatives in exchangeable bonds issued prior to 2001 were separated from their host contracts for the first time in 2001 upon the implementation of IAS 39 and SFAS 133 as of January 1, 2001. For additional information, see Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements. Insurance Benefits (Net). Net insurance benefits for our worldwide property-casualty business increased by E2,787 million, or 11.0%, to E28,200 million in 2001 from E25,413 million in 2000. A significant portion of the increase was attributable to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the United States, which negatively impacted net claims in the property-casualty lines by approximately E1.5 billion in 2001, primarily in the United States, and to a lesser extent, in our reinsurance operations in Germany and other countries. The remainder of the increase in net insurance benefits related to increased premium volume. 40 The following table sets forth net loss, expense and combined ratio information for our property-casualty operations by geographic region for the years 2001 and 2000: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 ------------------------------------------------------- REST OF REST OF SPECIALTY GERMANY EUROPE NAFTA WORLD LINES TOTAL ------- ------- ----- ------- --------- ----- Loss ratio(1).................. 76.2% 80.3% 99.9% 72.8% 66.5% 81.1% Expense ratio(2)............... 26.8% 26.2% 29.2% 32.9% 39.5% 27.7% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Combined ratio................. 103.0% 106.5% 129.1% 105.7% 106.0% 108.8% YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------- REST OF REST OF SPECIALTY GERMANY EUROPE NAFTA WORLD LINES TOTAL ------- ------- ----- ------- --------- ----- Loss ratio(1).................. 73.5% 80.8% 87.9% 75.5% 53.1% 77.9% Expense ratio(2)............... 24.2% 27.1% 29.6% 30.0% 36.3% 27.0% ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- Combined ratio................. 97.7% 107.9% 117.5% 105.5% 89.4% 104.9% --------------- (1) Represents ratio of total loss and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premium. (2) Represents ratio of net underwriting costs to net earned premium. The overall increase in the Group combined ratio to 108.8% in 2001 from 104.9% in 2000 reflects deteriorating loss ratios in the NAFTA zone, Germany and our specialty lines, primarily due to increased net claims as a result of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack and, in the case of specialty lines, unfavorable economic conditions, offset in part by improved loss ratios in Rest of Europe and Rest of World. Excluding the effect of the claims relating to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the United States, the combined ratio would have decreased slightly to 104.4% in 2001 from 104.9% in 2000. The Group expense ratio worsened slightly to 27.7% in 2001 from 27.0% in 2000, due primarily to expenses incurred in our German property-casualty operations and at Allianz AG, the results of which are included in our property-casualty segment, in connection with the build-out of our information technology systems and marketing and sales force development. Also contributing to the increased expense ratio were expenses incurred at Allianz AG relating to the integration of Dresdner Bank. Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses. Net underwriting costs of E9,543 million in 2001 increased E995 million, or 11.6%, over 2000 levels of E8,548 million, which slightly exceeded our property-casualty premium growth rate of 9.8% due primarily to expenses incurred in connection with information technology, marketing and sales force development. Net Income. Net income from property-casualty insurance operations in 2001 decreased by E898 million, or 27.5%, to E2,364 million in 2001 compared with E3,262 million in 2000. The decrease was driven primarily by the special adjustment to income taxes, which benefited our results in 2000, increased net claims resulting from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack and reduced investment results, reflecting weakness in the capital markets. These were offset in part by a tax benefit resulting from a substantial amount of tax losses attributable primarily to claims related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the United States, together with a significant amount of tax-exempt realized gains on investments resulting in large part from forward sales and other transactions that were entered into in 2001 but concluded in 2002. Amortization of goodwill was E349 million in 2001, an increase of E72 million, or 26.0%, from E277 million in 2000, largely as a result of amortization of goodwill on acquisitions made in Australia and the Netherlands. Minority interest increased to E746 million in 2001 from E642 million in 2000. 41 Our consolidated results of operations in 2000 included the effects of certain special adjustments to income taxes. There were no special adjustments to our consolidated results of operations in 2001. Excluding the impact of these items in 2000, net income would have increased by E139 million, or 6.2%, to E2,364 million in 2001, from E2,225 million in 2000. PROPERTY-CASUALTY LOSS RESERVES We establish loss reserves in our property-casualty business to cover our future payment obligations under insurance claims where either the amount of benefits to be paid or the date when payments are to be made is not yet fixed. The reserve is calculated using recognized actuarial methods to arrive at an estimated amount necessary to settle claims in full. For additional information on our property-casualty loss reserves, including discussion of our reserves by individual country on a local statutory accounting basis, see "-- Property-Casualty Loss Reserves." See also Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements. In 2002, our gross consolidated IFRS loss reserves decreased by E1,822 million, or 2.9%, to E59,564 million compared to E61,476 million in 2001, reflecting primarily a decrease from the high levels of 2001 that resulted from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. The decrease in 2002 was offset in part primarily by asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures in our U.S. operations, as well as smaller reserve increases in France and Italy. In the United States, we recorded a net increase of E762 million relating to asbestos and environmental exposures at our U.S. subsidiary Fireman's Fund for accident years 1987 and prior. We recorded this increase in September 2002 following completion of a study by external and internal actuaries of Fireman's Funds asbestos and environmental liabilities, which reflected deteriorating industry-wide loss trends. See "-- Property-Casualty Loss Reserves -- Individual Country Reserves -- Gross Reserves -- United States." Following the re-evaluation of certain lines of business in 2002, we also increased reserves relating to liability and workers' compensation at Fireman's Fund for accident years 2000 and 1999. In addition, we increased general liability reserves by E921 million at Allianz Insurance Co. for accident years 1997 to 2001 as a result of an actuarial analysis and more conservative re-underwriting in 2002, and property reserves at Allianz Insurance Co. by E184 million due to additional provisions relating to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. These increases were offset in part by favorable developments in commercial multi-peril and surety reserves at Fireman's Fund for the accident year 2000. In France, we increased gross loss reserves by E360 million in 2002, reflecting adverse reserve development in AGF's motor liability (E185 million), general liability (E105 million) and property (E50 million) lines, offset by favorable development at EULER & HERMES and Allianz Marine & Aviation. In Italy, we strengthened reserves in 2002 relating to motor liability and general liability at RAS Group. In 2001, our gross loss reserves increased by E7,429 million, or 13.7%, to E61,476 million compared to E54,047 million in 2000, primarily as a result of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. On a consolidated Group basis, the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 resulted in net claims of approximately E1.5 billion. In the United States, we increased gross reserves by E3,591 million in 2001, substantially all of which related to exposures at Allianz Insurance Co. resulting from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. We also increased reserves in Germany, the majority of which was attributable to reinsurance underwritten by Allianz AG, and the United Kingdom at Allianz Cornhill, in both cases for exposures resulting from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. In Italy, in 2001, we strengthened reserves relating to motor liability and general liability at RAS Group for several accident years, reflecting primarily a market-wide increase in personal injuries and average cost of claims in the motor liability line and an increase in late-reported claims in the general liability line. 42 PROPERTY-CASUALTY OPERATIONS BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION The following table sets forth our property-casualty gross premiums written and net income by geographic region. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region is presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different geographic regions and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS WRITTEN NET INCOME WRITTEN NET INCOME WRITTEN NET INCOME -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- (E IN MILLIONS) Germany(1)................ 12,314 9,235 12,644 3,773 11,948 3,320 Rest of Europe(1)......... 20,494 1,932 19,606 848 17,302 1,285 NAFTA..................... 5,992 (933) 6,822 (1,030) 6,300 (86) Rest of World............. 2,428 38 2,401 39 1,886 5 Specialty Lines(1)........ 4,948 (199) 2,321 94 2,267 227 Consolidation adjustments............. (2,882) (1,680) (1,657) (265) (1,321) (570) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Subtotal................ 43,294 8,393 42,137 3,459 38,382 4,181 Amortization of goodwill................ -- (370) -- (349) -- (277) Minority interests........ -- (816) -- (746) -- (642) ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total................... 43,294 7,207 42,137 2,364 38,382 3,262 ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ===== --------------- (1) Reflects the transfers, effective January 1, 2002, of marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance business and industrial reinsurance business to our marine and aviation and Allianz Global Risks specialty lines, respectively. See "-- Specialty Lines." GERMANY DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Germany is the world's third-largest property-casualty insurance market, based on gross premiums written in 2002. We were the largest provider of property-casualty insurance in Germany, with an estimated market share of 18.3%, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002. Germany is our most important single market for property-casualty insurance. As a percentage of our total property-casualty gross premiums written worldwide, Germany accounted for 26.7% in 2002, 28.9% in 2001, and 30.1% in 2000. This decrease in percentage primarily reflects the increased levels of gross premiums written from our operations in countries other than Germany. We conduct our property-casualty insurance operations in Germany primarily through the Sachversicherungsgruppe Deutschland (or the German Property-Casualty Group), which handles most of our lines of property-casualty insurance in Germany, other than credit insurance and marine and aviation insurance. Allianz AG, the parent company of the Group, acts as the reinsurer for most of the Group's German property-casualty operations and for other Group companies, other than credit and industrial reinsurance. In addition, Allianz AG underwrites a relatively small amount of reinsurance with customers outside of the Group. The Group's industrial reinsurance needs are largely handled by Allianz Global Risks. See "-- Specialty Lines -- Allianz Global Risks Ruckversicherungs-AG." 43 GERMAN PROPERTY-CASUALTY GROUP The German Property-Casualty Group comprises a number of different operating entities, some of which offer a full range of property-casualty lines and others of which provide specialized coverage: - Allianz Versicherungs-AG (or Allianz Versicherung), which is the German Property-Casualty Group's primary full-line property-casualty insurer; - Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG, a full-line property-casualty insurer based in Frankfurt; - Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG, a full-line property-casualty insurer based in Munich; - Kraft Versicherungs-AG, a specialist provider of predominantly automobile insurance; and - Vereinte Spezial Versicherung AG, primarily a specialist provider of automobile insurance. Our interests in some of these subsidiaries were substantially restructured pursuant to our letter of intent with Munich Re. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions." In addition, effective January 1, 2002, we transferred our marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance business in Germany to our marine and aviation specialty line (see "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation"). In November 2002, we merged our former property-casualty subsidiaries Vereinte Versicherung AG and Vereinte Rechtsschutzversicherung-AG into Allianz Versicherung, with retroactive effect to January 1, 2002. In 2003, we intend to merge Kraft Versicherungs-AG into Vereinte Spezial Versicherung AG, with retroactive effect to January 1, 2003. PRODUCTS The operating companies that make up the German Property-Casualty Group together offer a comprehensive range of property-casualty insurance products and related services to customers primarily in Germany. The German Property-Casualty Group's principal product lines are automobile liability and other automobile insurance, fire and property insurance, personal accident insurance, liability insurance and legal expense insurance. The German Property-Casualty Group's policy terms and conditions largely conform to those offered by other insurers in the German market. While the German Property-Casualty Group does seek to develop new policy types, given its position as the market leader in the German property-casualty insurance market, any competitive advantage gained by the introduction of new policy types tends to be short-lived, as competitors introduce equivalent forms of coverage. In all of our German business lines, policy persistency is an important factor in our profitability. Accordingly, we seek to ensure that our policyholders maintain their policies in force with us for long periods of time. Based on German industry statistics, we believe that our persistency rates are generally higher than those of most other German companies. In the property-casualty area, we have found that customers with multiple policies with us generally keep their policies in force for longer periods of time. Accordingly, the German Property-Casualty Group provides its customers with substantial discounts to the extent they hold multiple Allianz insurance policies. We estimate that currently more than 50% of the German Property-Casualty Group's German personal lines customers have more than one Allianz policy in force. While our insurance operations in Germany generally operate on a decentralized basis through separate operating entities, many of our products in Germany are distributed through common or overlapping distribution systems. The importance of these distribution channels varies by type of business. For the German Property-Casualty Group's personal and commercial lines, the network of full-time tied agents is our most important distribution channel. For industrial lines, the brokerage channel predominates. In connection with our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in 2001, we have placed approximately 960 insurance specialists to sell both life insurance 44 products and property-casualty insurance products at Dresdner Bank branches throughout Germany at December 31, 2002. The relative importance of each of these distribution channels also varies by region and by product mix. The following sets forth certain key data concerning our German insurance distribution systems as they related to property-casualty insurance at and for the year ended December 31, 2002: % OF 2002 PROPERTY-CASUALTY NUMBER(1) PREMIUMS --------- ----------------- Full-time tied agents....................................... 11,656 65.5 Part-time tied agents....................................... 43,076 6.5 Brokers..................................................... 7,601 14.1 Banks....................................................... 2,224(2) 3.1 Other(3).................................................... -- 10.8 ----- Total..................................................... -- 100.0 ===== --------------- (1) Represents the total number in Germany for all Allianz Group segments. (2) Represents the number of German branches at Dresdner Bank (811), and at unaffiliated banks, comprising Volks-und Raiffeisenbanken (1,406) and Industrie Kredit-Bank (7), with which we have distribution agreements covering our property-casualty and life/health insurance products. (3) Includes all Allianz Group employees in Germany, who are able to sell Allianz policies. In our German property-casualty insurance business, we distribute our products primarily through a network of self-employed, full-time tied agents. We believe that our network of tied agents is the largest full-time insurance sales force in Europe. These agents, who have an average of more than ten years' experience selling Allianz products, receive a full range of support from the Allianz Group, from initial support in establishing an office and a portfolio to pension benefits based upon the volume and product mix of their portfolios. Apart from pension provisions, agent compensation is based primarily on volume, although we also utilize a number of incentive schemes to encourage sales of strategically more important policy types. Our full-time tied agents follow centralized underwriting and pricing guidelines, allowing us to carefully segment and monitor our German book of business. ALLIANZ AG Allianz AG, the parent company of the Group, acts as the reinsurer for most of our German property-casualty operations and for other Group companies, other than credit insurance and international industrial reinsurance. In addition, Allianz AG assumes a relatively small amount of reinsurance from non-Group companies. Each subsidiary is able to place reinsurance directly with reinsurers other than Allianz AG, but Allianz AG has a preferred partnership with respect to reinsurance cessions of its subsidiaries based on ordinary market terms and conditions. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, Allianz AG assumed 39.4%, 41.5% and 41.8%, respectively, of all reinsurance ceded by Group companies. While the Group remains liable as a primary insurer notwithstanding the ceding of reinsurance to third parties, our evaluation criteria, which include the claims-paying and debt ratings, capital and surplus levels, and marketplace reputation of our reinsurers, are such that we believe any risks of collectibility to which we are exposed are not significant, and historically Group companies have not experienced difficulty in collecting from their reinsurers. Munich Re is our primary outside reinsurer. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, Munich Re Group assumed E2,300 million, E2,400 million and E2,300 million in reinsurance 45 premiums from us, representing 31.3%, 30.6% and 30.2%, respectively, of our total reinsurance premiums ceded. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. The following table sets forth premiums ceded by Allianz Group to Munich Re Group and other reinsurers for the years indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------------- ------------- ------------- E % E % E % (E IN MILLIONS) Premiums ceded.............................. 2,300 31.3 2,400 30.6 2,300 30.2 Other....................................... 5,057 68.7 5,438 69.4 5,327 69.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Total..................................... 7,357 100.0 7,838 100.0 7,627 100.0 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== Allianz AG acts as the primary reinsurer of our German property-casualty subsidiaries, other than our credit insurance subsidiary, EULER & HERMES, and our industrial reinsurance unit, Allianz Global Risks, for which Munich Re is the primary reinsurer. We bundled all of our reinsurance activities for our industrial lines in Allianz Global Risks effective January 1, 2002. See "-- Specialty Lines -- Allianz Global Risks Ruckversicherungs-AG." In the life/health area, Allianz AG and Munich Re each assume 50% of the reinsurance ceded by Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG, the main operating company for our German life insurance operations. Outside of Germany, Allianz AG acts as a reinsurer of Group subsidiaries, with a preferred partnership on all business ceded, and provides centralized advice to subsidiaries on structuring their own reinsurance programs, establishing lists of permitted reinsurers, and monitoring aggregate exposures to catastrophes and other events. The following table sets forth the reinsurance assumed by Allianz AG by gross premiums written for the years shown: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) From German Property-Casualty Group subsidiaries............ 3,028 3,024 3,176 From German life/health subsidiaries........................ 638 539 567 From EULER & HERMES(1)...................................... 155 107 107 From non-German subsidiaries................................ 1,190 1,170 907 ----- ----- ----- Subtotal............................................... 5,011 4,840 4,757 From non-Group companies.................................... 589 847 830 ----- ----- ----- Total.................................................. 5,600 5,687 5,587 ===== ===== ===== --------------- (1) Reflects the consolidation of our former French subsidiary, EULER, and our former German subsidiary, HERMES, into a new corporate entity EULER & HERMES in July 2002. Allianz AG writes a limited amount of third-party reinsurance, with premiums totaling E589 million in 2002, E847 million in 2001 and E830 million in 2000. Other than Munich Re Group, which represented E240 million, E511 million and E606 million, or 40.7%, 60.3% and 73.0%, of Allianz AG's third-party assumed reinsurance in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, no single third party accounted for any significant amount of reinsurance assumed in such years. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions." RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our German property-casualty operations. Gross premiums written by operating company are presented before consolidation adjustments 46 representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments. Net income by operating company is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. GERMANY -- PROPERTY-CASUALTY: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) German Property-Casualty Group..... 9,782 1,883 10,075 1,660 9,576 1,377 Allianz AG......................... 5,600 9,513(1) 5,687 2,516 5,587 2,293 Consolidation items................ (3,068) (2,161) (3,118) (403) (3,215) (350) ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total............................ 12,314 9,235 12,644 3,773 11,948 3,320 ====== ====== ====== ===== ====== ===== --------------- (1) Includes significant investment related results. See "-- Property-Casualty Insurance Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Net Income." The following table shows the composition of the German Property-Casualty Group's gross premiums written by product line for each of the years shown: GERMAN PROPERTY-CASUALTY GROUP: GROSS PREMIUMS WRITTEN BY LINE OF BUSINESS(1) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------------- ------------- ------------- E % E % E % (E IN MILLIONS) Automobile liability........................ 2,376 24.7 2,330 23.9 2,229 23.8 Fire and property(2)........................ 1,528 15.9 1,514 15.5 1,454 15.5 Other automobile............................ 1,481 15.4 1,468 15.0 1,394 14.9 Personal accident........................... 1,440 14.9 1,401 14.4 1,385 14.8 Liability(3)................................ 1,209 12.6 1,293 13.3 1,243 13.3 Legal Expense............................... 384 3.9 382 3.9 379 4.0 Transport and aviation(4)................... 70 0.7 259 2.7 229 2.4 Other(5).................................... 1,148 11.9 1,102 11.3 1,051 11.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Total..................................... 9,636 100.0 9,749 100.0 9,364 100.0 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== --------------- (1) Does not reflect business assumed through reinsurance operations in the amount of E146 million in 2002, of E326 million in 2001 and of E212 million in 2000. (2) Includes fire, household goods, building and other property insurance. (3) Excludes aviation liability insurance in 2002 due to the transfer of our aviation insurance activities into our specialty line, Marine & Aviation (see "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation"). (4) Includes only commercial transport insurance in 2002 due to the transfer of our industrial transport and aviation insurance activities into our specialty line, Marine & Aviation (see "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation"). 47 (5) Includes multi-line policies with individual customers in the former German Democratic Republic that were acquired through the acquisition of Deutsche Versicherungs-AG, as well as commercial multi-line property insurance. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Property-casualty gross premiums written in 2002 were E12,314 million, a decrease of E330 million, or 2.6%, from 2001 levels of E12,644 million, reflecting primarily the transfers effective January 1, 2002 of our marine, aviation and industrial transport business into Allianz Marine & Aviation, our separately reporting marine and aviation specialty line (see "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation") and of our international industrial reinsurance activities from Allianz AG to Allianz Global Risks, our separately reporting international industrial reinsurance specialty line (see "-- Specialty Lines -- Allianz Global Risks Ruckversicherungs-AG"). This decrease was offset in part by increases in gross premiums written in our automobile and other lines due to rate increases. Automobile liability and other automobile gross premiums written in Germany increased by E59 million, or 1.6%, to E3,857 in 2002 from E3,798 million in 2001, due primarily to rate increases, offset in part by a more selective underwriting policy. The number of vehicles insured decreased slightly to 8.97 million in 2002 from 9.17 million in 2001. Fire and property gross premiums written in Germany increased by E14 million, or 0.9%, to E1,528 million in 2002 from E1,514 million in 2001, primarily as a result of increases in residential fire insurance and other property insurance. Personal accident gross premiums written increased by E39 million, or 2.8%, to E1,440 million in 2002 from E1,401 million in 2001, due primarily to continuing increases in new business. Liability gross premiums written decreased by E84 million, or 6.5%, to E1,209 million in 2002 from E1,293 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the transfer of our aviation liability business to our marine and aviation specialty line (see "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation"), continued strong competition in commercial liability lines and portfolio cleansing measures in our large industrial and corporate lines. Reinsurance assumed by the German Property-Casualty Group decreased by E180 million, or 55.2%, to E146 million in 2002 from E326 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the transfer of our marine, aviation and industrial transport business into our marine and aviation specialty line. Premiums in our other lines of insurance showed slight increases from 2001 levels. Reinsurance assumed by Allianz AG decreased by E87 million, or 1.5%, to E5,600 million in 2002 from E5,687 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the transfer effective January 1, 2002 of our international industrial reinsurance activities from Allianz AG into Allianz Global Risks, a decrease in reinsurance assumed from Munich Re Group related to the restructuring of the respective shareholdings of Allianz AG and Munich Re in certain jointly owned subsidiaries and affiliates in 2002 and a market-wide shift from proportional to non-proportional reinsurance coverage. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Related Party Transactions -- Transactions with Munich Re -- Letter of Intent." The decrease was offset in part by strong rate increases in almost all lines of business and increased gross premiums written from expanded reinsurance relationships, predominantly with Allianz Group companies outside of Germany. Net Income. In Germany, property-casualty net income increased by E5,462 million, or 144.8%, to E9,235 million in 2002 from E3,773 million in 2001. The increase was due primarily to increased investment results, including realized gains of E1,886 million from open market sales of Munich Re shares and approximately E1,100 million from open market sales of Vodafone AG shares, as well as realized gains from the sale of other shareholdings in the Group's German equity portfolio. We also recorded significant income from intercompany transactions, including realized gains of E3,332 million from the transfer of Munich Re shares from Allianz AG to Dresdner Bank, dividend income of E382 million from Dresdner Bank and E224 million from the sale of Vereinte Lebensversicherung AG from Vereinte Versicherung AG to Allianz Leben. The gains on these intercompany transactions were eliminated at the Group level. Total net insurance 48 benefits in Germany decreased by E125 million, or 1.6%, to E7,980 million in 2002 from E8,105 million in 2001, due primarily to the transfers effective January 1, 2002 of our international industrial reinsurance and marine, aviation and industrial transport activities into our international industrial reinsurance and marine and aviation specialty lines, respectively. The decrease in net insurance benefits in Germany in 2002 also reflected decreased reinsurance claims at Allianz AG in comparison to the high level of net insurance benefits in 2001, which reflected claims from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. The decrease was partially offset by a substantial increase in natural catastrophe claims, including approximately E490 million in net claims related to flooding in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe in July and August 2002, as well as additional net claims related to Hurricane Isidore in Mexico in September 2002 (E25 million) and the windstorm "Jeanett" in Western Europe in October 2002 (E134 million). The loss ratio decreased to 74.2% in 2002 from 76.2% in 2001, reflecting primarily the decrease in claims in comparison to 2001 and the transfers of our industrial reinsurance and marine, aviation and transport activities into our industrial reinsurance and marine and aviation specialty lines, respectively. The expense ratio increased to 28.3% in 2002 from 26.8% in 2001, due primarily to increased personnel costs relating to employee pensions and expenses incurred in connection with the build-out and integration of distribution capacities of Allianz and Dresdner Bank. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Property-casualty gross premiums written in 2001 were E12,644 million, an increase of E696 million, or 5.8%, from 2000 levels of E11,948 million, due primarily to growth in our automobile liability, other automobile, fire and property and liability lines, as well as in reinsurance. Automobile liability and other automobile gross premiums written in Germany increased by E175 million, or 4.8%, to E3,798 million in 2001 from E3,623 million in 2000, due primarily to a general rise in rates in the German market. The number of vehicles insured decreased slightly to 9.17 million in 2001 from 9.24 million in 2000. Fire and property gross premiums written in Germany increased by E60 million, or 4.1%, to E1,514 million in 2001 from E1,454 million in 2000, primarily as a result of the purchase of a block of business from another insurance company. Liability gross premiums written increased by E50 million, or 4.0%, to E1,293 million in 2001 from E1,243 million in 2000, primarily as a result of increased demand for coverage of industrial and commercial risks. Reinsurance assumed by the German Property-Casualty Group increased by E114 million, or 53.8%, to E326 million in 2001 from E212 million in 2000, due to increased aviation and transportation reinsurance business written by Allianz and ceded in part through various pooling arrangements. Premiums in our other lines of insurance showed slight increases from 2000 levels. Reinsurance assumed by Allianz AG increased by E100 million, or 1.8%, to E5,687 million in 2001 from E5,587 million in 2000, due primarily to increased gross premiums written from expanded reinsurance relationships, predominantly with Allianz Group companies outside of Germany, offset by the reduction of an internal quota share cession from the German Property-Casualty Group to Allianz AG, which had a calculated premium impact of E204 million. Net Income. In Germany, property-casualty net income increased by E453 million, or 13.6%, to E3,773 million in 2001 from E3,320 million in 2000. Net income in 2000 reflected special adjustments to income taxes before minority interests of E1,017 million. Excluding the impact of these adjustments, German property-casualty net income would have increased by E1,470 million, or 63.8%, to E3,773 million in 2001 from E2,303 million in 2000. The increase was due primarily to increased investment results, including the E1,437 million of trading income discussed above, offset in part by higher claims resulting from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, amounting to E273 million in net reinsurance claims at Allianz AG and E67 million in net claims in the German Property-Casualty Group. Total net insurance benefits in Germany increased by E249 million, or 3.2%, to E8,105 million in 2001 from E7,856 million in 2000. The loss ratio 49 increased to 76.2% in 2001 from 73.5% in 2000 as a result of the increased claims. The increase in the loss ratio resulting from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack was offset in part by improvements in claim frequency, and a decrease in natural disasters affecting our German property-casualty results. The expense ratio increased to 26.8% in 2001 from 24.2% in 2000, due primarily to expenses incurred in connection with the build-out of our information technology systems and marketing and sales force development. Also contributing to the increased expense ratio were expenses incurred at Allianz AG relating to the integration of Dresdner Bank. REST OF EUROPE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS The Rest of Europe is, in the aggregate, our largest market for property-casualty insurance. As a percentage of our total property-casualty gross premiums written worldwide, the Rest of Europe accounted for 44.4% in 2002, 44.8% in 2001 and 43.6% 2000. We conduct our property-casualty insurance operations in the Rest of Europe through five main groups of operating companies in France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Spain. In the remainder of the Rest of Europe, we operate through approximately 35 Allianz subsidiaries in more than 17 other European countries. The property-casualty insurance products we offer in the Rest of Europe are in each case generally similar to those we offer in Germany. France. We conduct our property-casualty insurance operations in France through the AGF Group. The AGF Group is the third-largest property-casualty insurance provider in France, with an estimated market share of 11.4%, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002. The primary property-casualty insurance products which we offer in France are automobile, personal property, commercial, fire and injury insurance. As of December 31, 2002, we held 58.9% of the share capital of AGF (or 64.2% after deduction of own shares held by AGF), with the remainder being publicly traded in France. We distribute our property-casualty products and services in France primarily through a network of general agents and brokers. We also utilize specialized employee sales staff and bancassurance and other direct sales channels. Italy. We conduct our property-casualty insurance operations in Italy primarily through the RAS Group and Lloyd Adriatico, which we refer to together with our other Italian subsidiaries as our "Italian Subsidiaries." Taken together, the Italian Subsidiaries are the third-largest property-casualty insurer in the Italian market, with an estimated combined market share of 15.2%, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002. Lloyd Adriatico operates in all property-casualty lines, having developed a particular expertise in automobile insurance, while RAS Group underwrites primarily automobile insurance together with various other types of property-casualty insurance for both personal and commercial business throughout Italy. As of December 31, 2002, we held 51.7% of the voting rights of RAS Group, with the remainder being publicly traded in Italy, and 99.7% of the share capital of Lloyd Adriatico. As a result of a share buyback and other excess capital reduction measures at RAS Group that were completed in February 2003, our holding in the voting rights of RAS Group was increased to 55.5% as of February 17, 2003. The Italian Subsidiaries distribute our property-casualty products and services primarily through an extensive network of general agents, brokers and through Internet and telephone-based direct sales channels. United Kingdom. We were the sixth-largest provider of property-casualty insurance in the United Kingdom, with an estimated market share of 4.7%, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002. We operate our property-casualty insurance business in the United Kingdom primarily through our wholly owned subsidiary Allianz Cornhill Insurance plc (or Allianz Cornhill), formerly known as Cornhill Insurance Public Limited Company. The primary property-casualty insurance products that Allianz Cornhill offers in the United Kingdom are generally similar to 50 those offered by the German Property-Casualty Group in Germany. In addition, we sell a number of specialty products in the United Kingdom, including extended warranty and pet insurance. We distribute our property-casualty products and services in the United Kingdom through a range of distribution channels, including brokers and various product specific distribution channels, including affinity groups and other targeted direct marketing. Switzerland. We were the third-largest provider of property-casualty insurance in Switzerland, with an estimated market share of 8.3%, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002, not including travel insurance. We conduct our property-casualty insurance operations in Switzerland primarily through the Allianz Suisse Versicherungsgesellschaft, comprising the former ELVIA Versicherungs-AG group of companies, the Berner Versicherungs-Group and Allianz Versicherung (Schweiz) AG, which were merged into Allianz Suisse Versicherungsgesellschaft. Together with AGF Phenix, we refer to these companies as our "Swiss Subsidiaries." The Swiss Subsidiaries handle our lines of property-casualty insurance in Switzerland other than travel insurance. In addition, our wholly owned subsidiary Allianz Risk Transfer (or ART) sells conventional reinsurance as well as a variety of alternative risk transfer products for corporate customers worldwide. Our travel insurance subsidiary Mondial Assistance Group operates and is managed on a global basis and is discussed separately (see "-- Specialty Lines"). The Swiss Subsidiaries and ART distribute our products and services through a wide range of tied and general agents, and also through brokers, bancassurance and other direct channels. Spain. We were the second-largest provider of property-casualty insurance in Spain, with an estimated market share of 6.8%, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002. We serve the Spanish property-casualty insurance market through Allianz Compania de Seguros (Allianz Spain) and the two former AGF companies Union y Fenix and Athena Seguros. Allianz Spain has headquarters in Madrid and Barcelona, with regional offices throughout the country. Allianz Spain offers a wide variety of traditional personal and commercial property-casualty insurance products, with an emphasis on automobile insurance. Allianz Spain distributes its products through agents, brokers and direct distribution channels. Netherlands. Our most important subsidiaries in the Netherlands are Royal Nederland Verzekeringsgroep and Zwolsche Algemeene Holding. Our most important products are automobile and fire insurance. Our Netherlands subsidiaries distribute their products through independent agents and brokers. Austria. Allianz Elementar offers a broad range of property-casualty and health insurance products to individual and group customers in Austria. We distribute our property-casualty products in Austria primarily through employee agents, tied agents and brokers. Ireland. Our subsidiary Allianz Irish Life Holdings offers a wide variety of traditional property-casualty insurance products, including mainly automobile and commercial/industrial lines. Allianz Irish Life Holdings distributes its products primarily through brokers and to a lesser extent through agents and banks. Belgium. We conduct our property-casualty insurance business in Belgium primarily through AGF Belgium Insurance and Cobac. Our primary emphasis is on industrial insurance, in which we are among the market leaders. We also have a significant position in the market in automobile insurance. We distribute our property-casualty products in Belgium mainly through brokers. Other. In addition, we have property-casualty insurance operations in Hungary, Portugal, Luxembourg, Greece, the Czech Republic, Poland, Croatia and Bulgaria. We are also represented in the Slovak Republic, Romania and Russia, and are among the top five insurers in many of these markets. The primary products sold in these countries are mandatory third-party liability coverages and related additional coverage. We expect further increases in property-casualty gross premiums written as we work to build up our sales organization and exploit other synergies in our insurance operations in the rest of Europe. 51 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our Rest of Europe property-casualty operations. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. REST OF EUROPE -- PROPERTY-CASUALTY: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) France(1).......................... 4,941 383 5,392 31 4,745 451 Italy.............................. 4,939 907 4,585 487 4,264 258 United Kingdom..................... 2,711 256 2,507 94 2,108 49 Switzerland........................ 1,747 64 1,750 155 1,650 249 Spain.............................. 1,490 62 1,278 32 1,073 69 Netherlands........................ 1,023 285 873 284 557 438 Austria............................ 852 (33) 844 16 831 (50) Ireland............................ 860 170 738 (4) 563 19 Belgium............................ 362 (57) 391 8 393 (37) Other.............................. 1,739 68 1,410 98 1,284 118 Consolidation adjustments.......... (170) (173) (162) (353) (166) (279) ------ ----- ------ ---- ------ ----- Total............................ 20,494 1,932 19,606 848 17,302 1,285 ====== ===== ====== ==== ====== ===== --------------- (1) Reflects the transfer, effective January 1, 2002 of our French marine, aviation and industrial transport business to our marine and aviation specialty line. See "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation." YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. In Rest of Europe, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E888 million, or 4.5%, to E20,494 million in 2002 from E19,606 million in 2001. This increase reflected growth in gross premiums written in most of our primary property-casualty markets in Rest of Europe, especially Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, due primarily to rate increases in a number of lines. Net Income. Property-casualty net income in Rest of Europe increased by E1,084 million, or 127.8%, to E1,932 million in 2002 from E848 million in 2001, primarily as a result of realized gains of E713 million on the sale of a real estate subsidiary and E156 million on the intercompany transfer of our property-casualty subsidiary Allianz Irish Life Holdings from Allianz Holdings Ireland to Allianz AG, as well as improved underwriting results in our major Rest of Europe markets. Partially offsetting the increase was a broad decline in investment results due to weakness in the capital markets. Net insurance benefits in Rest of Europe rose by E387 million, or 3.0%, to E13,185 million in 2002 from E12,798 million in 2001, which was less than the 6.2% increase in net premiums earned, which increased to E17,108 million in 2002 from E16,106 million in 2001. The loss ratio in Rest of Europe decreased to 76.8% in 2002 from 80.3% in 2001, 52 reflecting the comparatively smaller increase in net insurance benefits than net premiums earned. The expense ratio decreased to 24.6% in 2002 from 26.2% in 2001. The following table sets forth net loss, expense and combined ratio information for our property-casualty operations in the Rest of Europe by geographic area for the years 2002 and 2001: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED FRANCE ITALY KINGDOM SWITZERLAND SPAIN OTHER TOTAL ------ ----- ------- ----------- ----- ----- ----- Loss ratio....................... 84.5% 74.8% 68.1% 70.3% 77.0% 77.9% 76.8% Expense ratio.................... 26.4% 22.7% 30.0% 23.8% 20.6% 24.0% 24.6% ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- Combined ratio................... 110.9% 97.5% 98.0% 94.1% 97.6% 101.9% 101.4% YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED FRANCE ITALY KINGDOM SWITZERLAND SPAIN OTHER TOTAL ------ ----- ------- ----------- ----- ----- ----- Loss ratio....................... 83.0% 76.7% 73.2% 79.1% 78.7% 86.1% 80.3% Expense ratio.................... 29.3% 22.5% 31.0% 26.9% 21.2% 25.7% 26.2% ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- Combined ratio................... 112.3% 99.2% 104.2% 106.0% 99.9% 111.8% 106.5% France. In France, property-casualty gross premiums written decreased by E451 million, or 8.4%, to E4,941 million in 2002 from E5,392 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the transfer of our French marine, aviation and transport business effective January 1, 2002 into Allianz Marine & Aviation, our separately reported specialty line. See "-- Specialty Lines -- Marine & Aviation." This decrease was offset in part by rate increases in all lines of business, particularly in our large industrial business and commercial property and liability lines. In the individual lines, gross premiums written also increased due to rate increases and growth in new business in our automobile insurance line. Our distribution arrangement with Credit Lyonnais Bank continued to contribute to the increase in individual lines. Net income increased significantly by E352 million to E383 million in 2002 from E31 million in 2001. The increase resulted primarily from improved underwriting results attributable to a decrease in acquisition costs and administrative expenses, realized gains on investments, as well as a tax benefit. Our loss ratio in France worsened to 84.5% in 2002 from 83.0% in 2001, largely due to strengthening of reserves for prior-year claims. Our expense ratio improved to 26.4% in 2002 from 29.3% in 2001 primarily as a result of streamlining of our information technology operations. Italy. In Italy, property-casualty gross premiums written were E4,939 million in 2002, an increase of E354 million, or 7.7%, from E4,585 million in 2001, due primarily to an increase in automobile premiums. Automobile premiums increased by E256 million, or 8.7%, in 2002, reflecting rate increases in the Italian market and an increase in the number of vehicles insured, despite a selective underwriting policy. We saw moderate increases in our other main lines of business, including fire, health and personal accident. Net income increased by E420 million, or 86.2%, to E907 million in 2002 from E487 million in 2001, due primarily to increased investment results reflecting a realized gain of E713 million on the sale of a real estate subsidiary, as well as improved underwriting results reflecting lower net claims. The loss ratio decreased to 74.8% in 2002 from 76.7% in 2001, reflecting the overall reduction in claim frequency, particularly in the automobile line, due to a more selective underwriting policy in recent years. United Kingdom. In the United Kingdom, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E204 million, or 8.1%, to E2,711 million in 2002 from E2,507 million in 2001 as a result of increases in almost all of our business lines, but particularly in commercial and industrial 53 business, due primarily to increased rates in the commercial, industrial and automobile insurance lines, reflecting the claims experience of UK insurers generally. The increase was offset in part by the negative effects of exchange rate movements (E34 million). Net income increased by E162 million, or 172.3% to E256 million in 2002 from E94 million in 2001, due primarily to improved underwriting results reflecting increased rates and the absence of major claim events in comparison to 2001, which reflected claims from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, as well as increased realized gains on investments due to dispositions. Net insurance benefits decreased by E24 million, or 1.8%, to E1,276 million in 2002 from E1,300 million in 2001. The loss ratio improved to 68.1% in 2002 from 73.2% in 2001, reflecting the comparatively greater increase in premiums as well as the absence of major claim events. Switzerland. In Switzerland, property-casualty gross premiums written were largely unchanged at E1,747 million in 2002, compared with E1,750 million in 2001, due primarily to decreased premiums in our technical, health and personal accident lines reflecting portfolio cleansing measures, offset in part by increased premiums at ART and in our automobile, property and liability lines as a result of increased rates. Gross premiums written in 2002 reflected a decrease of E46 million attributable to the one-time effect of a change in our method of recording assumed reinsurance premiums. We began recording such premiums on a current-year basis in 2001, with the result that two years' premiums were recorded in 2001, compared to the single-year premiums recorded in 2002. An additional approximately E40 million was attributable to the positive effect of exchange rate movements. Net income decreased by E91 million, or 58.7%, to E64 million in 2002 from E155 million in 2001, reflecting primarily investment writedowns and realized losses on investments, particularly equity securities, due to the weakness of the capital markets, offset in part by improved underwriting results. The loss ratio improved to 70.3% in 2002 from 79.1% in 2001 due to more favorable loss experience and portfolio cleansing in our health and accident insurance lines. Spain. In Spain, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E212 million, or 16.6%, to E1,490 million in 2002 from E1,278 million in 2001, as a result of increased sales in all lines of business, particularly automobile lines, where premium income increased by E127 million, or 14.4%. The increased sales resulted from new business in our automobile lines and the ongoing reorganization of our distribution channels to increase productivity and efficiency by expanding our sales agent network and better incentivizing agents. Net income increased by E30 million, or 93.8%, to E62 million in 2002 from E32 million in 2001. The increase reflected primarily improved underwriting results and a write-up of a real estate property in Spain, offset in part by decreased investment results. The loss ratio improved to 77.0% in 2002 from 78.7% in 2001, due primarily to increased premium income as a result of rate increases, together with a decrease in claims frequency in the automobile line due to a more selective underwriting policy. The expense ratio also improved to 20.6% in 2002 from 21.2% in 2001, due to proportionately lower underwriting expenses as a result of cost reduction measures. Other. Property-casualty gross premiums written in Rest of Europe countries other than France, Italy, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Spain (which we refer to as Other Rest of Europe) increased by E580 million, or 13.6%, to E4,836 million in 2002 from E4,256 million in 2001, primarily as a result of growth in the Netherlands, Ireland, Hungary and the Slovak Republic. Net income in Other Rest of Europe increased by E31 million, or 7.7%, to E433 million in 2002 from E402 million in 2001, primarily as a result of increased net income in Ireland, due primarily to a realized gain of E156 million on the intercompany transfer of our property-casualty subsidiary Allianz Irish Life Holdings from Allianz Holdings Ireland to Allianz AG, offset in part by decreased net income in Austria and Belgium, due primarily to decreased investment results in Austria and deteriorating underwriting results and decreased investment results in Belgium. 54 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. In Rest of Europe, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E2,304 million, or 13.3%, to E19,606 million in 2001 from E17,302 million in 2000. This increase reflected growth in gross premiums written in all of our primary property-casualty markets in Rest of Europe, especially France, the United Kingdom and Italy, due primarily to rate increases in a number of lines. Net Income. Property-casualty net income in Rest of Europe decreased by E437 million, or 34.0%, to E848 million in 2001 from E1,285 million in 2000, primarily as a result of sharply decreased net income in France, due primarily to reduced investment results and increased reinsurance costs, offset in part by increased investment results in Italy. Also contributing to the decrease in Rest of Europe was a broad decline in investment results in other countries due to weakness in the capital markets. Net insurance benefits in Rest of Europe rose by E822 million, or 6.9%, to E12,798 million in 2001 from E11,976 million in 2000, which was slightly less than the 8.8% increase in net premiums earned, which increased to E16,106 million in 2001 from E14,797 million in 2000. The loss ratio in Rest of Europe decreased slightly to 80.3% in 2001 from 80.8% in 2000, reflecting decreases in France, Italy, United Kingdom and Spain, offset in part by increases in Switzerland and Other Rest of Europe. The expense ratio declined slightly to 26.2% in 2001 from 27.1% in 2000. The following table sets forth net loss, expense and combined ratio information for our property-casualty operations in the Rest of Europe by geographic area for the years 2001 and 2000: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED FRANCE ITALY KINGDOM SWITZERLAND SPAIN OTHER TOTAL ------ ----- ------- ----------- ----- ----- ----- Loss ratio...................... 83.0% 76.7% 73.2% 79.1% 78.7% 86.1% 80.3% Expense ratio................... 29.3% 22.5% 31.0% 26.9% 21.2% 25.7% 26.2% ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Combined ratio.................. 112.3% 99.2% 104.2% 106.0% 99.9% 111.8% 106.5% YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED FRANCE ITALY KINGDOM SWITZERLAND SPAIN OTHER TOTAL ------ ----- ------- ----------- ----- ----- ----- Loss ratio...................... 85.8% 77.8% 82.7% 71.3% 81.1% 82.0% 80.8% Expense ratio................... 28.3% 21.6% 33.4% 30.9% 23.8% 28.4% 27.1% ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Combined ratio.................. 114.1% 99.4% 116.1% 102.2% 104.9% 110.4% 107.9% France. In France, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E647 million, or 13.6%, to E5,392 million in 2001 from E4,745 million in 2000, reflecting rate increases in all lines of business. In the commercial and industrial lines, the increase in gross premiums written was also due to new large industrial business and the increase of AGF MAT's share in aviation pools. In the individual lines, our distribution arrangement with Credit Lyonnais Bank also contributed to the increase. Net income decreased by E420 million, or 93.1%, to E31 million in 2001 from E451 million in 2000. The decrease resulted primarily from sharply reduced investment results as a result of the weak capital markets. We also experienced an increase in net insurance benefits, due to a greater volume of losses, especially in the second half of the year in our large industrial accounts, as well as a rise in the cost of reinsurance resulting from a change in market conditions for general industrial risks, particularly for non-proportional windstorm covered risks. Our loss ratio in France nonetheless improved to 83.0% in 2001 from 85.8% in 2000, largely reflecting increased premiums, the significant claims recorded in 2000 in relation to the late December 1999 storms "Lothar" and "Martin," a reduction in the frequency of automobile 55 claims, and a decrease in the average claim payments in our private insurance business. Net insurance benefits included E17 million related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. Italy. In Italy, property-casualty gross premiums written were E4,585 million in 2001, an increase of E321 million, or 7.5%, from E4,264 million in 2000, primarily due to increased automobile premiums. Automobile premiums increased by E238 million, or 8.8%, in 2001, reflecting the overall rate increases in the Italian market following a twelve-month statutory rate freeze on third-party liability policies which expired in March 2001. We also had an increase in the number of vehicles insured and an increase in rates on automobile policies other than third party liability. We saw moderate increases in our other main lines of business, including fire and personal property, general liability, health and personal accident. Net income increased by E229 million, or 88.8%, to E487 million in 2001 from E258 million in 2000, due primarily to improved underwriting results and increased investment results, offset in part by expenses incurred to improve the organizational structure and information technology systems of the RAS group. The loss ratio decreased slightly to 76.7% in 2001 from 77.8% in 2000, reflecting a more selective underwriting policy. United Kingdom. In the United Kingdom, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E399 million, or 18.9%, to E2,507 million in 2001 from E2,108 million in 2000, primarily as a result of increased rates in the automobile and property lines, reflecting the claims experience of UK insurers generally, as well as volume increases in commercial lines and pet insurance. Net income increased by E45 million, or 91.8% to E94 million in 2001 from E49 million in 2000, reflecting primarily improved underwriting results due to increased rates in the automobile and property lines. Net insurance benefits decreased by E26 million, or 2.0%, to E1,300 million in 2001 from E1,326 million in 2000, reflecting a more selective underwriting policy. The loss ratio improved to 73.2% in 2001 from 82.7% in 2000, reflecting the increase in gross premiums written and the decrease in net insurance benefits. Switzerland. In Switzerland, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E100 million, or 6.1%, to E1,750 million in 2001 from E1,650 million in 2000. Of this increase, E46 million was due to the one time effect of a change in our method of recording assumed reinsurance premiums. In previous years, such premiums were recorded on a one-year lag basis. In 2001, due to a change in our accounting policies, we began recording such premiums on a current-year basis, with the result that two years' premiums were recorded in 2001. The effect of this change, all of which was recorded in 2001 due to its overall minor impact on our results, was an increase in gross earned premiums of E46 million, or 0.1%, of the Group's consolidated property-casualty earned premiums, and an increase in income before taxes and minority interests of E3.4 million or 0.2%, compared to 2001. An additional E56 million was attributable to the positive effects of exchange rate movements. Net income decreased by E94 million, or 37.8%, to E155 million in 2001 from E249 million in 2000, reflecting a decrease in investment results. The loss ratio deteriorated to 79.1% in 2001 from 71.3% in 2000, despite a low level of natural catastrophes, due to a change in accounting methods whereby approximately E40 million previously allocated to underwriting costs are now included under net insurance benefits. This change in turn improved the expense ratio to 26.9% in 2001 from 30.9% in 2000. We also experienced increased reinsurance claims at ART, including E17 million related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. Spain. In Spain, property-casualty gross premiums written increased by E205 million, or 19.1%, to E1,278 million in 2001 from E1,073 million in 2000, reflecting increased sales in all lines of business, particularly automobile lines, where premium increased 21.8%. The increased sales resulted from the reorganization of the distribution system to better incentivize agents and to increase productivity. 56 Net income decreased by E37 million, or 53.6%, to E32 million in 2001 from E69 million in 2000, despite improved underwriting results in the automobile line. The decrease reflected primarily the effect of a tax adjustment in 2000, which increased net income in 2000 by E37 million, as well as decreased investment results in 2001. The loss ratio improved to 78.7% in 2001 from 81.1% in 2000, due to more selective underwriting policies introduced in recent years, which led to a reduction in claims frequency, particularly in the automobile line. The expense ratio also improved to 21.2% in 2001 from 23.8% in 2000, due to cost savings resulting from the successful integration of our Spanish subsidiaries into Allianz Spain. Other. Property-casualty gross premiums written in Rest of Europe countries other than France, Italy, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Spain (which we refer to as Other Rest of Europe) increased by E628 million, or 17.3%, to E4,256 million in 2001 from E3,628 million in 2000, primarily as a result of growth in the Netherlands and Ireland. Net income in Other Rest of Europe decreased by E86 million, or 17.6%, to E402 million in 2001 from E488 million in 2000, primarily as a result of deteriorating underwriting results and increased interest expense in the Netherlands. NAFTA DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Our property-casualty insurance markets in the NAFTA zone are the United States, Canada and Mexico. As a percentage of our total property-casualty gross premiums written worldwide, the NAFTA zone accounted for 13.0%, 15.6% and 15.9% in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. United States. Our property-casualty operations in the United States are organized under the umbrellas of Allianz Insurance Co. and Allianz of America, Inc. (or Allianz of America). We have been present in the United States since 1977, when we established Allianz Insurance Co., a leading provider of commercial insurance to major corporate customers, as one of our first U.S. subsidiaries. In 1991, we acquired Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a leading personal and commercial lines property-casualty insurance company founded in 1864. Allianz of America comprises a group of companies writing a wide variety of property-casualty lines of business. Our operations in the United States accounted for 88.7% of our gross written property-casualty insurance premiums in the NAFTA zone in 2002. Other. We also conduct property-casualty operations in Canada and Mexico. Our property-casualty products are generally similar to those we offer and sell in the United States. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our NAFTA zone property-casualty operations. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. 57 NAFTA -- PROPERTY-CASUALTY: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) United States...................... 5,330 (927) 6,171 (986) 5,667 (100) Canada............................. 549 (6) 539 (40) 516 (1) Mexico............................. 132 -- 135 (4) 137 15 Consolidated adjustments........... (19) -- (23) -- (20) -- ----- ---- ----- ------ ----- ---- Total............................ 5,992 (933) 6,822 (1,030) 6,300 (86) ===== ==== ===== ====== ===== ==== YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written in the NAFTA zone decreased E830 million, or 12.2%, to E5,992 million in 2002 from E6,822 million in 2001, due primarily to decreases in the United States. Gross premiums written in the United States decreased E841 million, or 13.6% to E5,330 million in 2002 from E6,171 million in 2001. Excluding the effect of exchange rate movements (E279 million), gross premiums written decreased by 9.1%, due primarily to a more selective underwriting policy and portfolio cleansing measures reflecting a renewed focus at Fireman's Fund on core business lines, offset in part by rate increases in all lines of business. The decrease in gross premiums written reflected decreased premium income in our workers' compensation insurance business at Fireman's Fund, which continued to reduce its exposure to this line of business in 2002, as well as decreases in our automobile line reflecting our determination to exit unprofitable markets. On a constant currency basis, our workers' compensation gross written premiums decreased by 58.5%. Net Income. In the NAFTA zone, net income increased by E97 million to a loss of E933 million in 2002 from a loss of E1,030 million in 2001, due primarily to reduced losses in the United States and Canada. Net income from property-casualty operations in the United States increased by E59 million, to a loss of E927 million in 2002 from a loss of E986 million in 2001, due primarily to reduced net insurance benefits compared to 2001, which reflected claims from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, offset in part by investment writedowns due to weakness in the capital markets. Net income was negatively affected by net insurance benefits of E762 million relating to asbestos and environmental reserve-strengthening measures at Fireman's Fund, and two major claims in the surety business (E108 million), which we discontinued in December 2001. The loss ratio in the NAFTA zone decreased to 94.6% in 2002 from 99.9% in 2001, largely due to our focus on core business lines and a more selective underwriting policy, as well as the absence of major claims in comparison to 2001, which reflected claims from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. For additional information on increased reserves at Fireman's Fund, see "-- Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves -- Individual Country Reserves -- Gross Reserves -- United States." YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written in the NAFTA zone increased E522 million, or 8.3%, to E6,822 million in 2001 from E6,300 million in 2000, due primarily to increases in the United States. Gross premiums written in the United States increased E504 million, or 8.9% to E6,171 million in 2001 from E5,667 million in 2000. Excluding the effect of exchange rate 58 movements (E201 million), gross premiums written increased by 5.3%, primarily reflecting growth at Fireman's Fund. On a constant currency basis, gross premiums written for commercial and automobile lines in the United States increased by 6.6% and 13.3%, respectively, as a result of rate increases due to the hardening market. Premium increases also reflect growth from new business in the liability, marine and crop lines of business. These increases were offset by a decrease in workers' compensation at Fireman's Fund, which continued to reduce its exposure to this line of business in 2001. On a constant currency basis, our workers' compensation gross written premiums decreased by 19.6%. Net Income. In the NAFTA zone, net income decreased sharply by E944 million to a loss of E1,030 million in 2001 from a loss of E86 million in 2000, due primarily to decreases in the United States. Net income from property-casualty operations in the United States decreased by E886 million, to a loss of E986 million in 2001 from a loss of E100 million in 2000, due primarily to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the United States and weakness in the U.S. capital markets. The loss ratio in the NAFTA zone increased to 99.9% in 2001 from 87.9% in 2000, largely due to net claims of E642 million at Allianz Insurance Co. and E55 million at Fireman's Fund related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. REST OF WORLD DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS The primary property-casualty insurance markets in which we operate in the Rest of World are Asia-Pacific and South America. As a percentage of our total property-casualty gross premiums written worldwide, Rest of World accounted for 5.2%, 5.5% and 4.8% in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Asia-Pacific Australia. Through Allianz Australia Group, we serve the markets of Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. Allianz Australia Group's insurance operations comprise exclusively property-casualty insurance products and services. We are the second-largest workers' compensation insurer in Australia, based on gross premiums written in 2002, and a leading provider of rehabilitation and occupational health, safety and environment services. We also operate in certain niche areas including premium financing and pleasure craft insurance. We market our products through brokers, which are the major distribution channels for commercial business in Australia, as well as non-tied agents (including automobile dealers, accountants and banks) and directly to the customer. Allianz Australia Group had gross premiums written of E1,163 million in 2002. Other. We also market property-casualty insurance products and services through our subsidiaries in Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Laos, Singapore, Vietnam, South Korea and China, and through signed joint venture agreements with Bajaj Auto, a large manufacturing company in India and the CP Group, a large conglomerate in Thailand. South America Brazil. We conduct our property-casualty operations in Brazil through our subsidiary AGF Seguros. With gross premiums written of E336 million in 2002, AGF Seguros is our largest property-casualty operation in South America and the sixth-largest property-casualty insurance provider in Brazil. The company writes primarily automobile insurance, together with fire, transportation and other lines. Distribution is primarily through brokers. Other. In addition to the markets described above, we sell property-casualty products in Colombia, Argentina, Chile and Venezuela. 59 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our Rest of World property-casualty operations. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. REST OF WORLD -- PROPERTY-CASUALTY: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Asia-Pacific............................ 1,596 (18) 1,344 11 784 31 South America........................... 768 47 962 29 891 (34) Other................................... 64 9 95 (1) 211 8 ----- --- ----- -- ----- --- Total................................. 2,428 38 2,401 39 1,886 5 ===== === ===== == ===== === YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written in Rest of World increased by E27 million, or 1.1%, to E2,428 million in 2002 from E2,401 million in 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to increased gross premiums written in Asia-Pacific, reflecting rate increases in all lines of business and the full-year consolidation of our property-casualty subsidiary in Malaysia, which was consolidated for the first time in October 2001, offset in part by decreased premium income in South America due to the negative effect of exchange rate movements and the scaling down of our property-casualty operations in Argentina. Net Income. In Rest of World, net income decreased by E1 million to E38 million in 2002 from E39 million in 2001, due primarily to decreased investment results in our Australian operations in Asia-Pacific, reflecting weakness in the capital markets. This decrease was offset in part by increased income in South America attributable to cost reduction measures and an improved investment strategy, particularly in Colombia and Venezuela. The loss ratio increased to 74.5% in 2002, compared with 72.8% in 2001, reflecting deteriorating underwriting results in South America, offset in part by improved underwriting results in our Australian operations in Asia-Pacific. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written in Rest of World increased by E515 million, or 27.3%, to E2,401 million in 2001 from E1,886 million in 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to our Australian operations, which acquired a significant block of business in 2001. Net Income. In Rest of World, net income increased by E34 million, to E39 million in 2001 from E5 million in 2000, due primarily to increased income in South America from our Brazilian and Colombian operations. These increases were offset in part by decreased income in Asia-Pacific. The loss ratio decreased to 72.8% in 2001 from 75.5% in 2000, reflecting more favorable underwriting results in South America, partially offset by deteriorating underwriting results in our Australian operations in Asia-Pacific. 60 SPECIALTY LINES DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS In addition to our multi-local approach to our global insurance business, under which our non-German insurance businesses are locally managed, we manage our specialty lines of credit/ trade insurance, marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance, industrial reinsurance and travel/assistance insurance on a worldwide basis. Through our subsidiary EULER & HERMES, we are the largest credit insurer in the world, and in travel/assistance insurance, we are also one of the world's largest insurers. CREDIT INSURANCE In July 2002, we consolidated our French subsidiary, EULER, and our German subsidiary, HERMES, into a new corporate entity, EULER & HERMES. The consolidation of EULER and HERMES, which complemented each other in terms of product mix and geographical penetration, further strengthened our presence in the marketplace. Through EULER & HERMES, we are the largest credit insurer in the world, with an estimated world market share of 37.0%, based on gross premiums written in 2002. Our credit operations generated gross premiums written of E1,579 million in 2002, E1,589 million in 2001 and E1,611 million in 2000. EULER & HERMES is the global leader in credit insurance in terms of gross premiums written and one of the European market leaders in factoring. EULER & HERMES's credit insurance operations are rated AA- by Standard & Poor's. EULER & HERMES is the leading credit insurer in Germany, with an estimated domestic market share of approximately 42% at December 31, 2002, based on gross premiums written. EULER & HERMES cedes a large portion of its gross premiums written to reinsurers. The percentage of gross premiums written ceded in reinsurance was 45.0% in 2002, 42.7% in 2001 and 42.0% in 2000, of which 9.8%, 6.7% and 6.6%, respectively, was ceded to Allianz AG. EULER & HERMES provides customers around the world with a wide range of credit insurance and related products and services, including commercial credit insurance and reinsurance, factoring services, guarantee insurance, fidelity insurance and consumer credit insurance, and manages, and derives fee income from, the German federal governments export credit guarantee program. MARINE & AVIATION Effective January 1, 2002, we reorganized our marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance business in Germany, France and the United Kingdom under Allianz Marine & Aviation, a new specialty line. Our marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance activities in these countries, which we had previously included in the property-casualty insurance results of our respective subsidiaries, were integrated into Allianz Marine & Aviation as a single European marine, aviation and industrial transport unit. Allianz Globus MAT Versicherungs-AG, our former German specialty insurer for marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance, was renamed Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs-AG, and AGF MAT, our French specialty unit for marine, aviation and transport insurance, was renamed Allianz Marine & Aviation (France). Allianz Marine & Aviation generated gross premiums written of E1,424 million in 2002. ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS RUCKVERSICHERUNGS-AG We launched Allianz Global Risks on January 1, 2002 to establish our international industrial risks reinsurance business as a globally managed segment. While our operating subsidiaries around the world continue to conduct our direct industrial insurance business, Allianz Global Risks acts as our industrial reinsurance clearing house, assuming industrial insurance from 61 Group companies and centralizing the placement of outgoing reinsurance with third-party carriers, primarily Munich Re, in the reinsurance market. Allianz Global Risks generated gross premiums written of E1,136 million in 2002, of which approximately E138 million, or 12.1%, was ceded in reinsurance to Munich Re. Through Allianz Global Risks, we aim to increase the efficiency and transparency of our international industrial reinsurance activities through economies of scale and a consistent reinsurance structure, including a selective underwriting policy, appropriate rates and coverage limits, tight risk management and centralized policies and standards throughout the Group. We have also introduced new products tailored for specific risks, such as our specialized directors and officers policy in the U.S. market, specialized liability products for the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, and policies covering Internet risks. Through these and other measures, we intend to reestablish our international industrial risks reinsurance business as a profitable market leader. TRAVEL AND ASSISTANCE INSURANCE We are one of the world's largest providers of travel and assistance insurance. Our travel and assistance insurance operations generated gross premiums written of E808 million in 2002, E732 million in 2001 and E656 million in 2000. We believe that internal growth and recent acquisitions in our travel and assistance business will enable us to strengthen our leading market position and achieve enhanced efficiencies in this dynamic market. With a view toward establishing long-term partnerships, our travel and assistance business provides business-to-business services to clients in the travel, insurance, automobile and banking industries. We provide travel and assistance insurance primarily through the Mondial Assistance Group, which is owned equally by our subsidiaries AGF and RAS. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our specialty insurance operations. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. SPECIALTY INSURANCE: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Credit............................. 1,579 16 1,589 91 1,611 203 Marine and aviation................ 1,424 21 -- -- -- -- Industrial reinsurance............. 1,136 (257) -- -- -- -- Travel and assistance.............. 808 21 732 3 656 24 ----- ---- ----- -- ----- --- 4,947 (199) 2,321 94 2,267 227 ===== ==== ===== == ===== === YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written in our specialty lines increased E2,626 million, or 113.1%, to E4,947 million in 2002 from E2,321 million in 2001, reflecting 62 primarily the inclusion of our international industrial reinsurance and marine and aviation specialty lines effective January 1, 2002. Premiums in international industrial reinsurance reflected significant rate increases, particularly in property and liability reinsurance. Increased gross premiums in the travel and assistance line was due largely to the expansion of our travel and assistance business in the United Kingdom and the full-year consolidation of travel and assistance providers in Australia and Thailand, which were consolidated in September 2001, offset in part by the ongoing downturn in the international travel market in 2002. In our aviation and marine specialty line, gross premiums written increased due to rate increases, offset in part by portfolio cleansing measures. The slight decrease in the credit line was attributable primarily to more selective underwriting policies and weakness in the global economy. Net Income. In our specialty lines, net income decreased significantly by E293 million to a loss of E199 million in 2002 from income of E94 million in 2001, due primarily to the inclusion of our international industrial reinsurance specialty line, which experienced net claims of E564 million related primarily to flooding in Central and Eastern Europe in July and August 2002, and expenses incurred in building up the industrial reinsurance business, as well as reduced net income in the credit line, resulting from reduced investment results and an increase in the frequency and severity of claims. Net income in our travel and assistance lines increased due to the absence of major claims in comparison to 2001, which reflected claims from the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. In our marine and aviation specialty line, net income increased, reflecting primarily the absence of major claims compared to 2001. The loss ratio increased to 75.9% in 2002 from 66.5% in 2001, largely reflecting increased net claims attributable to the inclusion of our international industrial reinsurance specialty line and the increased claims in the credit line. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written in our specialty lines increased E54 million, or 2.4%, to E2,321 million in 2001 from E2,267 million in 2000, reflecting an increase in the travel and assistance lines, offset in part by a decrease in the credit lines. The increase in travel and assistance premiums is attributable to internal growth, together with targeted acquisitions. The decrease in the credit lines was due to a change in the method of reporting service fees for EULER. Prior to 2001, these fees were included as part of gross premiums written. Beginning in 2001, these fees, which amounted to E144 million and E122 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively, were excluded from gross premiums written consistent with the treatment of such fees by HERMES. Excluding the impact of this change, gross premiums written would have increased by E122 million, or 7.6%, in 2001 compared to 2000, primarily due to internal growth. Net Income. In our specialty lines, net income decreased by E133 million, or 58.6%, to E94 million in 2001 from E227 million in 2000, due primarily to reduced net income in the credit line, resulting from an increased number of large claims as a result of unfavorable economic conditions. Net income in our travel and assistance lines also decreased due to lower investment results and higher expenses for assistance services. The loss ratio increased to 66.5% in 2001 from 53.1% in 2000, largely due to the increased claims in the credit line. 63 LIFE/HEALTH INSURANCE OPERATIONS The following table sets forth certain financial information for our life/health insurance operations for the years indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------- ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Gross premiums written(1)................................... 20,663 20,145 20,239 ------- ------- ------- Premiums earned (net)(2).................................... 18,675 18,317 18,378 Interest and similar income................................. 11,215 10,765 10,152 Income from affiliated enterprises joint ventures and associated enterprises.................................... 445 525 693 Other income from investments............................... 4,932 3,562 6,667 Trading income.............................................. 244 (117) (49) Fee and commission income, and income from service activities................................................ 200 268 271 Other income................................................ 825 772 1,139 ------- ------- ------- Total income.............................................. 36,536 34,092 37,251 ------- ------- ------- Insurance benefits (net).................................... (21,284) (21,979) (26,354) Interest and similar expenses............................... (434) (492) (148) Other expenses for investments.............................. (8,656) (5,537) (3,004) Loan loss allowance......................................... (10) (4) -- Acquisition costs and administrative expenses............... (4,263) (4,259) (3,927) Amortization of goodwill.................................... (174) (146) (137) Other expenses.............................................. (1,806) (1,263) (2,055) ------- ------- ------- Total expenses............................................ (36,627) (33,680) (35,625) ------- ------- ------- Earnings from ordinary activities before taxation........... (91) 412 1,626 Taxes....................................................... (67) (99) (343) Minority interests in earnings.............................. 177 (84) (658) ------- ------- ------- Net income.................................................. 19 229 625 ======= ======= ======= --------------- (1) Under IFRS reporting standards, gross written premiums include only the cost- and risk-related components of premiums generated from unit-linked and other investment-oriented products, but do not include the full amount of statutory premiums written on these products. Statutory premiums are total revenues from sales of life insurance policies, in accordance with the statutory accounting practices applicable in the insurer's home jurisdiction. On a statutory premium basis, total premiums written were E40,066 million, E33,687 million and E31,025 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. (2) Net of reinsurance ceded of E1,207 million, E1,169 million and E1,139 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written of our life/health operations in 2002 increased by E518 million, or 2.6%, to E20,663 million in 2002 from E20,145 million in 2001. Disregarding the effects of exchange rate movements and changes in the scope of consolidation, which increased 2002 life/health gross premiums written by E32 million, gross premiums written would have increased by E486 million or 2.4%. On a statutory premium basis, gross premiums written increased by E6,379 million, or 18.9%, to E40,066 million in 2002 from E33,687 million in 64 2001, due to significant increases in sales of investment-oriented products, reflecting the general trend towards investment-oriented insurance products in particular in the United States and Italy. Gross premiums written for investment-oriented insurance products increased by E5,861 million, or 43.3%, to E19,403 million. Premiums Earned (Net). On a Group-wide basis, life/health net premiums earned in 2002 and 2001 reflected premiums ceded to reinsurers of E1,207 million and E1,169 million, respectively, resulting in overall retention levels of approximately 93.9% in 2002 and 94.0% in 2001. Net premiums increased by E358 million, or 2.0%, to E18,675 million in 2002 from E18,317 million in 2001, generally consistent with the increase in gross premiums written in this period. Insurance Benefits (Net). Net insurance benefits for our worldwide life/health business consist of benefits paid, changes in aggregate policy reserves, and expenses of premium refunds to policyholders. Net life/health insurance benefits decreased by E695 million, or 3.2%, to E21,284 million in 2002 from E21,979 million in 2001, primarily as a result of reduced income from investments in 2002 resulting from weakness in the capital markets. The reduction in income from investments in turn resulted in reduced policyholder participation benefits, which are included in benefits paid and changes in aggregate policy reserves, due to the participatory nature of our life insurance business. See, for example, "-- Germany -- Life Insurance." Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses which consist primarily of payments and changes in deferred acquisition costs, administrative expenses, and net underwriting costs, remained relatively constant at E4,263 million in 2002, compared with E4,259 million in 2001. Net Income. Net income from life/health insurance decreased by E210 million, or 91.7%, to E19 million in 2002 from E229 million in 2001, primarily as a result of reduced income from investments, particularly in our operations in Germany, France and Switzerland. See "-- Asset Management Operations -- Group's Own Investments -- Investment Income" for a discussion of investment results for life/health insurance investments. Amortization of goodwill in our life/health lines increased to E174 million in 2002 from E146 million in 2001, while minority interests in earnings were a credit of E177 million in 2002, compared to a debit of E84 million in 2001, primarily as a result of the increase in our shareholding in Allianz Leben and decreased earnings. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Transactions with Munich Re." YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written of our life/health operations in 2001 decreased by E94 million, to E20,145 million in 2001 from E20,239 million in 2000. Disregarding the effects of exchange rate movements, which reduced 2001 life/health gross premiums written by E85 million, gross premiums written would have decreased by E9 million. A large portion of the decrease is explained by the sale of a large group policy in France in 2000, which increased gross premiums written in that year by approximately E800 million. Excluding the impact of this sale, together with the impact of foreign exchange movements, gross premiums written would have increased by E791 million, or 3.9%, in 2001, due to increases in Rest of Europe and Rest of World. On a statutory premium basis, gross premiums written increased by E2,662 million, or 8.6%, to E33,687 million in 2001 from E31,025 million in 2000, reflecting the general trend towards investment-oriented insurance products in Rest of Europe and the United States. Gross premiums written for investment-oriented insurance products increased by E2,756 million, or 25.6%, to E13,542 million. Premiums Earned (Net). On a Group-wide basis, life/health net premiums earned in 2001 and 2000 reflected premiums ceded to reinsurers of E1,169 million and E1,139 million, 65 respectively, resulting in overall retention levels of approximately 94.0% in 2001 and 94.2% in 2000. Net premiums decreased slightly by E61 million to E18,317 million in 2001 from E18,378 million in 2000, generally consistent with the slight decrease in gross premiums written in this period. Insurance Benefits (Net). Net life/health insurance benefits decreased by E4,375 million, or 16.6%, to E21,979 million in 2001 from E26,354 million in 2000, primarily as a result of reduced income from investments in 2001. The reduction in income from investments in turn resulted in reduced policyholder participation benefits, which are included in benefits paid and changes in aggregate policy reserves. Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses increased by E332 million, or 8.5%, to E4,259 million in 2001 from E3,927 million in 2000, due primarily to increased underwriting costs resulting from the continued expansion of our investment-oriented products. Under IFRS, these costs are expensed as incurred, even though significantly less than the amount of statutory premium is recognized as revenue. Net Income. Net income from life/health insurance decreased by E396 million, or 63.4%, to E229 million in 2001 from E625 million in 2000, primarily as a result of reduced income from investments, particularly in Germany and Rest of Europe. See "-- Asset Management Operations -- Group's Own Investments -- Investment Income" for a discussion of investment results for life/health insurance investments. On a Group-wide basis, amortization of goodwill in our life/health lines increased to E146 million in 2001 from E137 million in 2000, while minority interest decreased to E84 million in 2001 from E658 million in 2000. The decrease in minority interests resulted primarily from decreased earnings. The consolidated results of our life/health operations in 2000 included the effects of certain special adjustments to income taxes. There were no special adjustments to our consolidated results of operations in 2001. Excluding the impact of these items in 2000, net income would have decreased by E412 million, or 64.3%, to E229 million in 2001 from E641 million in 2000. LIFE/HEALTH OPERATIONS BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION The following table sets forth our gross life/health premiums written and net income by geographic region for the years indicated. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different geographic regions and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented after tax and before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. 66 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Germany Life.................................. 9,369 80 8,969 65 9,094 514 Health................................ 2,865 64 2,691 48 2,587 56 Consolidation adjustments............. -- (7) -- 14 -- 13 ------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ----- Total.............................. 12,234 137 11,660 127 11,681 583 Rest of Europe.......................... 5,181 (95) 5,486 381 5,751 910 Rest of World........................... 3,251 (24) 3,010 (49) 2,818 (71) Consolidation adjustments............... (3) (2) (11) -- (11) (2) ------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ----- Subtotal........................... 20,663 16 20,145 459 20,239 1,420 Amortization of goodwill................ -- (174) -- (146) -- (137) Minority interests...................... -- 177 -- (84) -- (658) ------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ----- Total.............................. 20,663 19 20,145 229 20,239 625 ====== ==== ====== ==== ====== ===== A significant portion of our life/health operations in Rest of Europe and Rest of World consists of sales of unit-linked products. Only the cost- and risk-related components of premiums generated from the sale of such products is included in gross premiums written under IFRS. GERMANY DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS We were the largest provider of life insurance and the third-largest provider of health insurance in Germany, with estimated market shares of 14.8% and 12.4%, respectively, as measured by gross premiums written in 2002. Germany is by far our most important market for life/health insurance. As a percentage of our total life/health gross premiums written worldwide, Germany accounted for 59.2% in 2002, 57.8% in 2001, and 57.7% in 2000. On a statutory premium basis, Germany accounted for 31.4% of our total life/health gross premiums written in 2002. We conduct our life/health insurance operations in Germany through: - Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG (or Allianz Leben), the main operating company for our German life insurance operations. In January 2002, pursuant to an agreement announced in 2001, we purchased an additional 40.5% of Allianz Leben's outstanding shares from Munich Re, thereby increasing our shareholding in Allianz Leben to 91.0%, with the balance of the outstanding shares in Allianz Leben publicly traded in Germany. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions." At December 31, 2002, we owned 91.0% of Allianz Leben. In November 2002, we merged our former life insurance subsidiary Vereinte Lebensversicherung AG into Allianz Leben, with retroactive effect to January 1, 2002; - Deutsche Lebensversicherungs-AG, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz Leben, which is our vehicle for selling standardized, low-cost term insurance in Germany; and 67 - Allianz Private Krankenversicherungs-AG (or Allianz Private Health), our health insurance subsidiary, formerly known as Vereinte Krankenversicherung AG, which we renamed in January 2003. Our life/health insurance operations in Germany employed 9,683 people at the end of 2002, 10,366 people at the end of 2001 and 9,995 people at the end of 2000. DISTRIBUTION Our distribution channels for our life/health products in Germany are similar to those used for our property-casualty products. Many of our products in Germany are distributed through common or overlapping distribution systems. In our German life/health insurance businesses, we distribute our products primarily through a network of self-employed, full-time tied agents. For our individual life, health and mutual fund products, the network of full-time tied agents is our most important distribution channel. Brokers are also an important channel for the distribution of Allianz Leben's and Allianz Private Health's group life and health products. The bank distribution channel is utilized primarily in our life insurance business. We distribute our life insurance products through Dresdner Bank, and under contractual arrangements with Volks-und Raiffeisenbanken, a network of cooperative banks in southern Germany, as well as through IKB, a German industrial credit bank. Since 2001, we have placed approximately 960 insurance specialists (as of December 31, 2002) to sell both life insurance products and property-casualty insurance products at Dresdner Bank branches throughout Germany. The following table sets forth certain key data concerning our distribution systems as they relate to life and health insurance at and for the year ended December 31, 2002: % OF 2002 -------------------- LIFE HEALTH NUMBER(1) PREMIUMS PREMIUMS --------- -------- -------- Full-time tied agents..................................... 11,656 58.6 82.0 Part-time tied agents..................................... 43,076 5.5 7.2 Brokers................................................... 7,601 9.7 5.9 Banks..................................................... 2,224(2) 19.4 -- Other(3).................................................. -- 6.8 4.9 ----- ----- Total................................................... -- 100.0 100.0 ===== ===== --------------- (1) Represents the total number in Germany for all Allianz Group segments. (2) Represents the number of German branches at Dresdner Bank, (811), and at unaffiliated banks, comprising Volks- und Raiffeisenbanken (1,406) and Industrie Kredit-Bank (7), with which we have distribution agreements covering our property-casualty and life/health insurance products. (3) Includes all Allianz Group employees in Germany, who are able to sell Allianz policies. LIFE INSURANCE Life insurance is the most popular form of savings for old age in Germany. With the demographic shift toward an aging German population, we see increasing opportunities for our life insurance business as private sector products are used to supplement decreasing levels of state provisions. In addition, the demand for insurance against financial loss resulting from occupational disability has grown rapidly in Germany in recent years as the German statutory social insurance system has provided declining levels of support. On January 1, 2002, a new law (the Altersvermogensgesetz) took effect, providing incentives for private retirement plans and company pension funds beginning in 2002. The new law, which 68 was enacted by the German legislature in May 2001, provides for direct state subsidies or, in certain circumstances, tax-free premium payments, and it requires that life-long benefit payments be guaranteed. The benefit payments will be subject to income tax. In July 2001, we started selling through Allianz Leben specially designed products that satisfy the legal requirements of the Altersvermogensgesetz, primarily that the sum of premium payments be fixed at the beginning of the benefit payment period. We established Allianz Pensionskasse AG, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz Leben, and Allianz Dresdner Pensionsfonds AG, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz AG, in 2002 in order to more aggressively sell a variety of pension products in accordance with the Altersvermogensgesetz. Although sales of Altersvermogensgesetz products have been slower than initially expected, Allianz Leben is the leader in this market, with an estimated market share of approximately 20% as of December 31, 2002. In the life insurance area, our policy surrender rates were 3.7% in 2002, 3.6% in 2001, and 3.6% in 2000, compared to German industry-wide surrender rates of 4.9%, 4.6%, and 4.5% (based on information provided by Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft), respectively. We believe that this is in large part due to our widely recognized and well respected brand name, our position as a market leader in most German insurance lines, our reputation for superior customer service and our financial strength. We also pay close attention to promoting follow-on business, which involves persuading policyholders to reinvest funds. This typically takes the form of using the benefits paid out on an endowment policy as the single premium for an immediate annuity that ensures a guaranteed income for the rest of the policyholder's life, or investing in a fund managed by our asset management subsidiary ADAM. See "-- Asset Management Operations." The proportion of funds paid by our German life insurance operations that were reinvested in other Allianz products has increased significantly over the past three years. PRODUCTS Our German life insurance companies offer a comprehensive and unified range of life insurance and life insurance-related products on both an individual and group basis. The main classes of coverage offered are: endowment life insurance, annuity policies, term life insurance, unit-linked annuities, and other life insurance-related forms of cover, which are provided as riders to other policies and on a stand-alone basis. Allianz Leben also assumes reinsurance of each of these individual and group life insurance products. Our endowment life products for the German market include policies both with unchanging levels of premiums and guaranteed benefits and with premiums and guaranteed benefits that rise automatically in accordance with contributions to the German statutory pension system in Germany. Amounts payable at maturity of an endowment policy include a "guaranteed benefit," an amount established by reference to a legally mandated maximum guaranteed technical interest rate on actuarial reserves. This interest rate is currently 3.25% per year for policies issued on or after July 1, 2000, having declined from 4% per year. The future profit participation credited to policyholders is not guaranteed. The total amount payable at the maturity of a policy, which is calculated based on the total expected profit participation, is the principal basis of competition between life insurance providers in the German market. Under current German law, the policyholder must be credited with at least 90% of each year's statutory net investment result plus an appropriate share in other profit components. In the current competitive environment, however, the rate of profit participation exceeds this statutory minimum and is subject to periodic adjustment by insurers in light of competitive conditions prevailing from time to time. In conformity with prevailing market conditions, we currently credit 91% to 92% of each year's profits to policyholders. 69 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth the components of life insurance gross premiums written in Germany for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- NEW RECURRING NEW RECURRING NEW RECURRING BUSINESS PREMIUMS TOTAL BUSINESS PREMIUMS TOTAL BUSINESS PREMIUMS TOTAL -------- --------- ----- -------- --------- ----- -------- --------- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Individual policies Endowment.......... 236 4,330 4,566 208 4,501 4,709 378 4,524 4,902 Annuities.......... 1,452 1,438 2,889 1,176 1,320 2,496 1,145 1,363 2,508 Term............... 18 78 96 16 73 89 14 68 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Subtotal......... 1,706 5,846 7,551 1,400 5,894 7,294 1,537 5,955 7,492 Group policies..... 695 1,122 1,818 617 1,058 1,675 591 1,011 1,602 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Total............ 2,401 6,968 9,369 2,017 6,952 8,969 2,129 6,965 9,094 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. In Germany, life insurance premiums increased E400 million, or 4.5%, to E9,369 million in 2002 from E8,969 million in 2001, due primarily to a substantial increase in new business, reflecting the increased efficiency of our life insurance distribution channels, including Dresdner Bank. Individual life insurance policies, which include endowment, term and annuity policies, accounted for 80.6% of our gross life insurance premiums written in Germany in 2002. Gross premiums written on individual life insurance increased by 3.5%, to E7,551 million in 2002 from E7,294 million in 2001, due primarily to increased individual pension business. New individual business increased to E1,706 million in 2002 from E1,400 million in 2001. The increase in new individual business was attributable to premium income from new Altersvermogensgesetz policies, many of which were sold in 2001 but had premium payments that began on January 1, 2002. Sales of such policies slowed market-wide in 2002 as a result of weakening customer demand for such policies due to the complexity of such policies, public skepticism regarding the Altersvermogensgesetz scheme and public discussion of the possibility of further pension-related reforms. Group life insurance gross premiums written increased E143 million, or 8.5%, to E1,818 million in 2001 from E1,675 million in 2001, due primarily to successful development of new distribution capacities for occupational pension schemes. Net Income. In Germany, net income from life insurance operations increased by E15 million, or 23.1%, to E80 million in 2002 from E65 million in 2001, due primarily to reduced costs and a lower tax expense, offset in part by substantial writedowns of investments as a result of weakness in the capital markets. Despite the increase in new business, acquisition costs decreased by 26.2%, and the expense ratio decreased by 4.0% to 9.7% in 2002 from 13.7% in 2001, reflecting primarily lower amortization of deferred acquisition costs. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. In Germany, life insurance premiums decreased E125 million, or 1.4%, to E8,969 million in 2001 from E9,094 million in 2000, due primarily to a decrease in premiums on individual policies. Individual life insurance policies, which include endowment, term and annuity policies, accounted for 81.3% of our gross life insurance premiums written in Germany in 2001. Gross 70 premiums written on individual life insurance decreased by 2.6%, to E7,294 million in 2001 from E7,492 million in 2000, due primarily to a large number of endowment policies either maturing or reaching the end of their premium payment period. New individual business decreased to E1,400 million in 2001 from E1,537 million in 2000. The decrease in new individual business was attributable primarily to a shift in the focus of our full-time tied agent distribution channel toward the sale of new Altersvermogensgesetz policies, most of which, although sold in 2001, have premium payments which began on January 1, 2002. Group life insurance gross premiums written increased E73 million, or 4.6%, to E1,675 million in 2001 from E1,602 in 2000, due to the growth of new business. Net Income. In Germany, net income from life insurance operations decreased by E449 million, or 87.4%, to E65 million in 2001 from E514 million in 2000. Excluding the impact of a release of deferred taxes in 2000 resulting from a change in German statutory tax rates, net income would have decreased by E402 million, or 86.1%, to E65 million in 2001 from E467 million in 2000, due primarily to reduced investment results in 2001, attributable to weakness in the capital markets. HEALTH INSURANCE Allianz Private Health is the third-largest private health insurer in Germany, with approximately 2.3 million customers and an estimated market share of approximately 12.4% in 2002. Allianz Private Health has strong ties to the German medical profession and is the largest health insurer for this profession in Germany and is the market leader in providing group health insurance. The German statutory healthcare system operates as a mandatory system for persons with incomes below a specified threshold (Versicherungspflichtgrenze)and allows persons with incomes above the threshold to voluntarily opt out of the statutory system and use the private healthcare system. Currently, the German healthcare system is dominated by the German statutory schemes, while private providers of health insurance, including Allianz Private Health, compete for the remainder. In January 2003, this specified income threshold was raised by the German legislator in order to stabilize and maintain the statutory healthcare system. As a consequence, the number of individuals who are able to choose protection under the private healthcare system may decrease. While this measure may reduce new business for full private health coverage for salaried employees, it may also create new business opportunities for supplementary insurance for individuals insured under statutory health insurance plans. Further changes to the German healthcare system are currently being considered, in particular with a view to reducing costs. Enactment into law of any such changes may have an impact on private health insurance providers, as the amount of new business written under full private health coverage may further decrease. Allianz Private Health provides a wide range of health insurance products, including full private healthcare coverage for the self-employed, salaried employees and civil servants; supplementary insurance for people insured under statutory health insurance plans; daily sickness allowance for the self-employed and salaried employees; hospital daily allowance; supplementary care insurance; and foreign travel medical expenses insurance. Like endowment and other life insurance products, health insurance products include mandatory profit-sharing features, whereby Allianz Private Health, like any other German private health insurer, returns 80% of the statutory profit on its health business, after the payment of claims and claims costs, the establishment of reserves, payment of taxes and other expenses, to policyholders annually, generally in the form of premium subsidies or rebates. Since the beginning of 2000, Allianz Private Health has also been required by law to allocate to its 71 policyholders 90% of interest surplus which is a component of statutory profits. As with our endowment policies in Germany, the actual level of profit sharing we provide our policyholders is, for competitive reasons, in excess of the statutory minimum and has been between 85% and 90% of statutory profits in recent years. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth the components of health insurance gross premiums written in Germany for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Individual policies......................................... 2,180 2,054 1,979 Group policies.............................................. 685 637 608 ----- ----- ----- Total..................................................... 2,865 2,691 2,587 ===== ===== ===== Medical expense insurance................................... 2,029 1,853 1,754 Other personal supplementary insurance...................... 370 370 358 Compulsory long-term care insurance......................... 230 230 238 Other health insurance...................................... 236 238 237 ----- ----- ----- Total..................................................... 2,865 2,691 2,587 ===== ===== ===== YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Health insurance premiums in Germany increased E174 million, or 6.5%, to E2,865 million in 2002 from E2,691 million in 2001. This increase was due primarily to rate increases in medical expense insurance and new business. Gross premiums written on medical expense insurance, which accounted for 70.8% of health insurance premiums in Germany in 2002, increased by E176 million, or 9.5% to E2,029 million in 2002 from E1,853 million in 2001. The increase was attributable primarily to rate increases and new business. Gross premiums written on other personal supplementary insurance and compulsory long-term care insurance remained unchanged at E370 million and E230 million, respectively, in 2002 compared to E370 million and E230 million, respectively, in 2001. Gross premiums written on other health insurance in Germany decreased to E236 million in 2002 from E238 million in 2001. Net Income. In Germany, net income from health insurance operations increased by E16 million, or 33.3%, to E64 million in 2002 from E48 million in 2001, reflecting primarily improved investment results. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Health insurance premiums in Germany increased E104 million, or 4.1%, to E2,691 million in 2001 from E2,587 million in 2000. This increase was due primarily to increases in new business, especially in medical and other personal supplementary lines, as well as increased rates and a decrease in cancellations from the previous year. Gross premiums written on medical expense insurance, which accounted for 68.9% of health insurance premiums in Germany in 2001, increased by E99 million, or 5.6% to E1,853 million in 2001 from E1,754 million in 2000. Gross premiums written on other personal supplementary insurance increased by E12 million, or 3.4% to E370 million in 2001 from E358 million in 2000. Both increases were attributable to a growth in new business and a decrease in cancellations. Compulsory long-term care insurance decreased by E8 million, or 3.4%, from E238 million in 2000 72 to E230 million in 2001, reflecting a reduction in the industry-wide tariff for compulsory long-term care insurance. Gross premiums written on other health insurance in Germany increased by E1 million to E238 million in 2001. Net Income. In Germany, net income from health insurance operations decreased by E8 million, or 14.3%, to E48 million in 2001 from E56 million in 2000. This was due primarily to decreased investment results, offset in part by an increase in the amount of deferred taxes released in 2001 compared to 2000. REST OF EUROPE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS The Rest of Europe is our second-largest market for life/health insurance. As a percentage of our total life/health gross premiums written worldwide, the Rest of Europe accounted for 25.1% in 2002, 27.2% in 2001 and 28.4% in 2000. We conduct our life/health insurance operations in the Rest of Europe through four main groups of operating companies in France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. The life products we write in our various Rest of Europe markets are written on both an individual and group basis and include traditional term and annuity products, unit-linked products and endowment and pension products. The design and features of these products vary by country, depending on local tax laws, product regulation and market conditions, and are designed to pay death benefits, optimize inheritances, provide for retirement, pay annuities or build capital, or combinations of these. France. We conduct our life/health insurance operations in France through the companies of the AGF Group. The AGF Group is the eighth-largest life insurance provider in France, with an estimated market share of 4.7%, based on gross premiums written in 2002. The AGF Group provides a broad line of life insurance and other financial products, including short-term investment and savings products. An important portion of AGF Group's life premiums is generated through the sale of unit-linked policies and investment-oriented products with guaranteed interest, for which only the cost- and risk-related components of premiums are reflected in gross premiums written under IFRS. The AGF Group also operates in the French health insurance market through a separate business unit responsible for both group insurance and health insurance and offers a wide variety of health products, which are designed to pay benefits that complement those of the mandatory French social security plan. The results of our health operations in France are included in part in our property-casualty segment and in part in our life segment. Italy. We conduct our life/health insurance operations in Italy primarily through the Italian Subsidiaries. Taken together, the Italian Subsidiaries are the second-largest life insurer in the Italian market, with an estimated market share of 13.6%, based on gross premiums written in 2002. The Italian Subsidiaries' individual life policies are primarily endowment policies but also include annuities and other policies, including capitalization and other products. Consistent with trends in the Italian market generally, the Italian Subsidiaries' products include an increasing amount of unit-linked policies, where policyholders participate directly in the performance of policy-related investments, and a decreasing amount of endowment products. In 2002, sales of unit-linked and equity-linked products sold through banks reached 71.0% of our total statutory life premiums in Italy, reflecting the importance of this distribution channel. The Italian Subsidiaries' unit-linked policies include products linked to funds managed by the Italian Subsidiaries, as well as by third-party investment managers, and index-linked products. Spain. We are the fourteenth-largest life insurance provider in Spain, with an estimated market share of 2.0%, based on gross premiums written in 2002. We conduct our life/health 73 operations in Spain primarily through Allianz Spain and through Eurovida and Europensiones, our joint ventures with Banco Popular. Our Spanish life insurance subsidiaries sell mainly traditional life insurance and pensions and unit-linked products. Switzerland. We conduct our life/health operations in Switzerland primarily through the Swiss Subsidiaries. Taken together, the Swiss Subsidiaries are the sixth-largest life insurance provider in Switzerland, with an estimated market share of 4.8%, based on gross premiums written in 2002. The Swiss Subsidiaries sell a wide range of individual and group life insurance products, including retirement and old age, death and disability products. Other. We conduct significant life/health operations in the remainder of the Rest of Europe through approximately 18 Allianz subsidiaries in more than 13 other European countries. In Austria, we operate through our life insurance subsidiary Allianz Elementar Leben. We serve the Belgian life insurance market primarily through AGF Belgium Insurance and the Netherlands life insurance market primarily through Royal Nederland Verzekeringsgroep. Our largest life insurance subsidiaries in other countries in the Rest of Europe are located in Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal, Hungary and Poland. Our life insurance products in Other Rest of Europe are generally the same as the life products we offer in the German market. Our life insurance operations in Other Rest of Europe had gross premiums written of E1,260 million in 2002, E1,148 million in 2001, and E971 million in 2000. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our Rest of Europe life/health operations. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. REST OF EUROPE -- LIFE/HEALTH: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET PREMIUMS NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) France............................. 1,493 (223) 1,556 97 2,297 391 Italy.............................. 1,298 289 1,336 261 1,454 306 Switzerland........................ 651 (80) 584 (17) 524 43 Spain.............................. 502 30 879 28 532 75 Other.............................. 1,260 (109) 1,148 12 971 95 Consolidation adjustments.......... (23) (2) (17) -- (27) -- ----- ---- ----- --- ----- --- Total............................ 5,181 (95) 5,486 381 5,751 910 ===== ==== ===== === ===== === YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. In Rest of Europe, life/health gross premiums written decreased by E305 million, or 5.6%, to E5,181 million in 2002 from E5,486 in 2001, reflecting primarily decreases in gross premiums written in Spain, France and Italy, offset in part by increases in Other Rest of Europe and Switzerland. 74 Net Income. In Rest of Europe, net income from life/health insurance operations decreased by E476 million, or 124.9%, to a loss of E95 million in 2002 from income of E381 million in 2001. This was due to decreases in France, Other Rest of Europe and Switzerland, offset in part by increases in Italy and Spain. France. In France, life/health gross premiums written, which include fees from unit-linked products and investment-oriented products with guaranteed interest, decreased by E63 million, or 4.0%, to E1,493 million in 2002 from E1,556 million in 2001. The decrease was due primarily to decreased premium income in our group life business, reflecting the sale of a large group policy in France in 2001. In addition, we experienced decreased sales in our individual life business of conventional unit-linked life insurance products, reflecting the continuing weakness in the capital markets, offset in part by an increase in investment-oriented products with guaranteed interest. Net income in France decreased significantly by E320 million to a loss of E223 million in 2002 from income of E97 million in 2001, primarily as a result of substantial realized losses and writedowns on investments due to unfavorable conditions in the capital markets. Italy. In Italy, life gross premiums written, which include fees from unit-linked products, decreased E38 million, or 2.8%, to E1,298 million in 2002 from E1,336 million in 2001. This decrease was attributable primarily to decreased sales of traditional life insurance policies in favor of investment-oriented products with guaranteed interest. Sales of traditional unit-linked products slowed in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of weakness in the capital markets. Net income in Italy increased to E289 million in 2002 from E261 million in 2001, due primarily to a realized gain of E186 million from the sale of a real estate subsidiary. Spain. In Spain, life gross premiums written decreased by E377 million, or 42.9%, to E502 million in 2002 from E879 million in 2001, primarily attributable to a substantial decrease in our pension group business as a result of a one-time premium recorded in 2001 in connection with the underwriting of a large group policy, offset in part by increases in gross premiums written in other group business and individual life business. Net income increased by E2 million, or 7.1%, to E30 million in 2002 from E28 million in 2001, due primarily to improved investment results, offset in part by decreased underwriting results. Switzerland. In Switzerland, life/health gross premiums written increased by E67 million, or 11.5%, to E651 million in 2002 from E584 million in 2001. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in individual business with high single premiums. In Switzerland, net income decreased to a loss of E80 million in 2002 from a loss of E17 million in 2001, due primarily to realized losses on investments and writedowns of impairments, particularly on equity securities. This decrease was offset by a tax benefit of approximately E95 million relating to the accrual of deferred tax benefits attributable to the capitalization of tax losses carried forward. Other. Life/health gross premiums written in Other Rest of Europe increased by E112 million, or 9.8%, to E1,260 million in 2002 from E1,148 million in 2001. Net income in Other Rest of Europe decreased significantly by E121 million to a loss of E109 million in 2002, compared with income of E12 million in 2001, reflecting primarily reduced net income in the Netherlands and Belgium as a result of weakness in capital markets. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. In Rest of Europe, life/health gross premiums written decreased by E265 million, or 4.6%, to E5,486 million in 2001 from E5,751 in 2000, reflecting primarily in a sharp decrease in gross premiums written in France and a smaller decrease in Italy, offset in part by increases in Spain, Other Rest of Europe and Switzerland. Net Income. In Rest of Europe, net income from life/health insurance operations decreased by E529 million, or 58.1%, to E381 million in 2001 from E910 million in 2000. This was due to 75 decreases in all of our Rest of Europe markets, particularly France and Switzerland, reflecting primarily reduced income from investments. France. In France, life/health gross premiums written, which include fees from unit-linked products, decreased by E741 million, or 32.3%, to E1,556 million in 2001 from E2,297 million in 2000. The decrease in 2001 from 2000 reflects primarily the sale of a large group policy in 2000. Excluding this policy, gross premiums written would have increased by 3% in 2001 over 2000. Net income in France decreased by E294 million, or 75.2%, to E97 million in 2001 from E391 million in 2000, primarily as a result of decreased income from investments due to unfavorable conditions in the capital markets, while expenses remained constant compared to 2000. Italy. In Italy, life gross premiums written, which include fees from unit-linked products, decreased E118 million, or 8.1%, to E1,336 million in 2001 from E1,454 million in 2000. This decrease was primarily attributable to a high number of endowment policies which matured and were replaced by sales of unit-linked products, reflecting the importance of the banking channel, which distributes such products. Net income in Italy decreased to E261 million in 2001 from E306 million in 2000, due primarily to reduced income from investments resulting from weak capital markets in 2001. Spain. In Spain, life gross premiums written increased by E347 million, or 65.2%, to E879 million in 2001 from E532 million in 2000. This increase was primarily attributable to higher sales of pension policies. Net income decreased by E47 million, or 62.7%, to E28 million in 2001 from E75 million in 2000, due primarily to reduced income from investments in 2001 and a tax adjustment in 2000. Switzerland. In Switzerland, life/health gross premiums written increased by E60 million, or 11.5%, to E584 million in 2001 from E524 million in 2000. This increase was attributable primarily to growth in single premium policies, especially in group life. In Switzerland, net income decreased to a loss of E17 million in 2001 from net income of E43 million in 2000, due primarily to lower income from investments, including significant writedowns for impairments. Other. Life/health gross premiums written in Other Rest of Europe increased by E177 million, or 18.2%, to E1,148 million in 2001 from E971 million in 2000. Net income in Other Rest of Europe decreased by E83 million or 87.4%, to E12 million in 2001 from E95 million in 2000, reflecting primarily reduced income in our Belgian operations, as a result of lower income from investments. REST OF WORLD DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS As a percentage of our total life/health gross premiums written worldwide, Rest of World accounted for 15.7% in 2002, 14.9% in 2001 and 13.9% in 2000. Our primary life/health markets in Rest of World are the United States and the Asia-Pacific region. United States. We serve the United States life/health insurance market through Allianz Life, which is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Allianz Life and its subsidiaries are licensed to write business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Guam. Allianz Life markets a wide variety of fixed and variable life insurance and annuity contracts, and long-term care insurance to individual and corporate customers. Allianz Life is a market leader in providing fixed annuities (including equity-indexed annuities) to individuals. Allianz Life also provides life reinsurance and healthcare excess of loss coverage. In 2002, our total statutory premiums written from life/health insurance in the United States, which include sales of investment-oriented products, were E9,530 million, up significantly from E4,982 million in 2001. 76 Asia-Pacific. The primary life, health insurance markets in which we operate in the Asia-Pacific area are as follows: South Korea. Our insurance operations in South Korea consist of our two subsidiaries, Allianz Life Insurance Korea, formerly Allianz First Life, which we acquired in 1999, and France Life, a former subsidiary of AGF which joined the Allianz Group in 1998 following our acquisition of AGF. We refer to these subsidiaries together as the South Korean Subsidiaries. The South Korean Subsidiaries market a wide variety of life insurance products including individual endowment insurance, education insurance, protection insurance, annuities, traditional whole life insurance policies, group life insurance protection and employee severance plans. Together, the South Korean Subsidiaries generated E1,894 million in annual statutory premiums in 2002. Other Asia-Pacific. In addition to the primary markets described above, we conduct life and accident insurance operations in Taiwan, China, Thailand, Indonesia, India and Malaysia. We also market a range of health insurance products in Indonesia, Singapore and Pakistan. Other. In addition to the United States and Asia-Pacific, we also sell life/health products in South America, primarily Brazil, Chile and Colombia. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table shows key financial data for our Rest of World life/health operations. Consistent with our general practice, gross premiums written by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different countries and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. REST OF WORLD -- LIFE/HEALTH: KEY DATA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- GROSS GROSS GROSS PREMIUM NET PREMIUM NET PREMIUM NET WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME WRITTEN INCOME ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) United States........................ 1,411 (18) 1,478 (24) 1,465 133 Asia-Pacific......................... 1,639 (9) 1,229 (5) 970 (181) Other................................ 201 3 303 (20) 383 (23) ----- --- ----- --- ----- ---- Total.............................. 3,251 (24) 3,010 (49) 2,818 (71) ===== === ===== === ===== ==== YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Gross Premiums Written. Life/health gross written premiums for Rest of World increased by E241 million, or 8.0%, to E3,251 million in 2002 from E3,010 million in 2001. Life/health gross premiums written in the United States were E1,411 million in 2002, a decrease of E67 million from E1,478 million in 2001. On a constant currency basis, gross premiums written in the United States increased slightly by E9 million, or 0.6%, in 2002. The slight increase was primarily attributable to growth in our fixed annuity business at Allianz Life and the expansion of our distribution channels, offset in part primarily by decreased premium income from other life and health insurance business. Life/health gross premiums written in Asia-Pacific increased by E410 million, or 33.4%, to E1,639 million in 2002 from E1,229 million in 2001, primarily as a result of increases in our operations in South Korea, where gross premiums written increased by E182 million, or 17.2%, to E1,242 million in 2002 from E1,060 million in 2001, as a result of a significant increase in new business and Taiwan. Life/health gross premiums written in Other Rest of World 77 decreased by E102 million, or 33.7%, to E201 million in 2002 from E303 million in 2001, primarily due to decreased premium income in Brazil, Colombia and Chile. Net Income. Life/health net income in Rest of World increased by E25 million to a loss of E24 million in 2002 from a loss of E49 million in 2001. The increase was primarily the result of increased net income in South America due to lower acquisition costs and administrative expenses. Net income in Asia-Pacific decreased by E4 million, to a loss of E9 million in 2002 from a net loss of E5 million in 2001, due primarily to decreased net income in South Korea, reflecting primarily higher tax expense. In 2002, losses from life/health operations in the United States were E18 million, compared to a net loss of E24 million in 2001, due primarily to improved underwriting results and a higher volume of business, offset in part by investment writedowns as a result of weakness in the capital markets. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Gross Premiums Written. Life/health gross written premiums for Rest of World increased by E192 million, or 6.8%, to E3,010 million in 2001 from E2,818 million in 2000. Life/health gross premiums written in the United States were E1,478 million in 2001, an increase of E13 million from E1,465 million in 2000. On a constant currency basis, gross premiums written in the United States decreased by E35 million, or 2.4%, in 2001. The decrease was primarily attributable to reduced mortality and expense fees on our variable annuity business due to decreased assets under management resulting from unfavorable market conditions, together with the termination of our accident and health reinsurance assumed and broker administrator business. Life/health gross premiums written in Asia-Pacific increased by E259 million, or 26.7%, to E1,229 million in 2001 from E970 million in 2000, primarily as a result of our operations in South Korea, where gross premiums written increased by E206 million, or 24.1%, to E1,060 million in 2001 from E854 million in 2000, as a result of a significant increase in new business. Life/health gross premiums written in Other Rest of World decreased by E80 million, or 20.9%, to E303 million in 2001 from E383 million in 2000, primarily due to decreased gross premiums written in Brazil and Colombia. Net Income. Life/health net income in Rest of World increased by E22 million to a loss of E49 million in 2001 from a loss of E71 million in 2000. The reduced loss was primarily the result of reduced losses in Asia-Pacific, despite a loss in the United States in 2001. Losses in Asia-Pacific decreased by E176 million, to a net loss of E5 million in 2001 from a net loss of E181 million in 2000, due primarily to improved results in South Korea, whose 2000 results reflected significant write-offs as discussed below. In 2001, the net loss from life/health operations in the United States was E24 million, compared to net income of E133 million in 2000. This decrease was primarily the result of realized losses on investments of E38 million in 2001 compared to realized gains on investments of E146 million in 2000. In addition, net income in the United States decreased as a result of increased reinsurance claims, primarily due to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, and increased costs associated with the development of our distribution force for our variable annuity business, coupled with decreased annuity considerations as a result of lower variable annuity assets under management, due to declines in the capital markets. COMPETITION There is substantial competition in Germany and the other countries in which we do business for the types of insurance products and services that we provide. This competition is most pronounced in our more mature markets -- Germany, France, Italy and the United States. In recent years, however, competition in emerging markets has also increased as large insurance and other financial services participants from more developed countries have sought to establish themselves in markets perceived to offer higher growth potential, and as local institutions have 78 become more sophisticated and have sought alliances, mergers or strategic relationships with our competitors. In Germany, which is our largest market for insurance operations, there is intense competition for virtually all of the products and services that we provide. In addition, the German insurance sector is a mature market in which we already have significant market shares in most lines of business. BANKING OPERATIONS Through our subsidiary Dresdner Bank, we offer a wide range of private, commercial and investment banking products and services for corporate, governmental and individual customers, primarily in the European market. Based on total assets at December 31, 2002, Dresdner Bank was one of the largest banks in Germany. We established banking as our fourth core business segment alongside property-casualty insurance, life/health insurance and asset management following our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in 2001. We have included Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements since July 23, 2001, the date of the acquisition. Prior to 2001, we had included the results of our banking operations, together with those of our asset management business, in our financial services segment. Our banking segment, established in 2001, consists primarily of the banking operations of Dresdner Bank, as our other banking operations have not historically been significant. Total banking income increased from E1,722 million in 2000 to E12,755 million and E21,275 million in 2001 and 2002, respectively. For a discussion of our asset management operations, including those of Dresdner Bank, which are not included in our banking segment, see "-- Asset Management Operations." For the year ended December 31, 2002, our banking segment recorded a loss of E1,358 million. This result included a realized gain of E1,912 million from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM (see "-- Asset Management Operations") and a realized gain of E244 million from the merger of our mortgage banking subsidiary Deutsche Hypothekenbank AG (or Deutsche Hyp) into Eurohypo AG (or Eurohypo)(see "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate"), as well as E287 million of other net realized gains on investments (see "-- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001"). The selected statistical information on our banking operations set forth in "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations" differs in significant respects from, and may not be comparable to, the financial information presented below. Although we have included Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements since July 23, 2001, the statistical information includes the banking operations of Dresdner Bank for all periods presented. The statistical information for all periods presented also includes the asset management operations of Dresdner Bank, which we do not include in our banking segment. In addition, the statistical information presents the assets and liabilities of Dresdner Bank without reflecting the adjustments that are necessary to apply purchase accounting, which we have applied in the financial information presented below. For additional information, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations." Dresdner Bank was founded in 1872 in Dresden, Germany, and grew by acquisition and branch expansion throughout Germany to become a leading German bank. In 1952, Dresdner Bank was split into three separate institutions, which were subsequently reunified to form Dresdner Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main, in 1957. In recent years, Dresdner Bank has made significant acquisitions in investment banking, including British merchant bank Kleinwort Benson Group plc in 1995 and U.S.-based investment bank Wasserstein Perella & Co. in January 2001, and asset management, including U.S. asset manager RCM Capital Management in 1995. 79 With approximately 1,100 branch offices and 47,000 employees at December 31, 2002, Dresdner Bank is focused on selected customer groups, geographic regions and business areas in which the bank traditionally holds a strong position. Our principal banking products and services include traditional commercial banking activities such as deposit taking, lending (including residential mortgage lending), cash management and transaction banking, as well as corporate finance advisory services, mergers and acquisitions advisory services, capital and money market services, securities underwriting and securities trading and derivatives business on our own account and for our customers. We operate through the domestic and international branch network of Dresdner Bank and through various subsidiaries both in Germany and abroad, some of which also have branch networks. At December 31, 2002, our branch banking network comprised approximately 1,000 German branches, giving us a presence throughout Germany, and 100 non-German branches. For 2002, Germany, the Rest of Europe and the NAFTA zone accounted for approximately 77%, 14% and 8%, respectively, of our net revenue from banking operations. REORGANIZATION OF BUSINESS DIVISIONS Dresdner Bank reorganized its business structure in the course of 2001 to focus on two major operating divisions, Private and Business Clients and Corporates & Markets. In 2001, in order to serve comparable customer needs out of a single integrated business division focused on corporate customers and the capital markets, we combined our investment banking activities and our European corporate banking and capital markets activities into our Corporates & Markets division. Effective January 1, 2002, we also integrated our small business operations, which we had previously included as part of our Corporates & Markets division, with our Private Clients division to form a new Private and Business Clients division. The goal of this reorganization is to increase fee and commission income by creating cross-selling opportunities through joint provision of services to both small business and private client customers and by offering a wider range of commission-related services together with additional advisory expertise. In addition, effective January 1, 2002, we merged the home loan savings businesses of the Allianz Group and Dresdner Bank, which provide home loans at favorable rates to customers with home loan savings accounts, into a new entity, Allianz Dresdner Bauspar AG, within the new Private and Business Clients division. In 2001, we included the home loan savings business of the Allianz Group other than Dresdner Bank in our Private Clients division, while the home loan savings business of Dresdner Bank was reported with our other real estate activities in the real estate business line of our Other division. On August 1, 2002, we also merged our mortgage banking subsidiary, Deutsche Hyp, which was a part of our Other division, with the mortgage banking subsidiaries of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank into a single entity, Eurohypo. The assets and liabilities of the former Deutsche Hyp were accordingly deconsolidated as of August 1, 2002. In connection with the merger, we provided a guarantee of up to E351 million for loan losses relating to the portfolio of Deutsche Hyp. We account for our remaining interest of approximately 28% of Eurohypo using the equity method. Following the merger, the real estate business line of our banking segment was dissolved. See "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." In September 2002, in conjunction with the restructuring measures described below, we announced that certain performing loans to non-strategic customers and non-performing loans as well as certain private equity investments held primarily by our Corporates & Markets division and certain undrawn loan commitments would be bundled together in the new IRU within our banking segment, effective in 2003. The aim of the IRU is to free up risk capital through the reduction of risk-weighted assets by restructuring non-performing loans to strategic customers 80 with the intent of returning such loans to the business units from which they originated, while maximizing the recovery from remaining non-performing loans, as well as non-strategic customer loans, through repayment, sale, hedging, securitization and other means. Loans to be bundled together in the IRU are primarily performing loans to non-strategic clients, such as small- capitalization clients in Latin America, Asia and the United States, as well as, to a lesser extent, loans to corporate and private clients that are currently non-performing. The IRU is expected to initially include approximately E31 billion, consisting of approximately E22 billion of loans, (including approximately E7 billion of non-performing loans and approximately E1 billion of potential problem loans) and approximately E1 billion of other non-strategic assets, including private equity investments, and approximately E8 billion of un-drawn commitments. In other initiatives, we combined the private equity operations of the Allianz Group and Dresdner Bank into Allianz Private Equity Holding in April 2002 and merged our information technology companies AGIS and DREGIS effective January 1, 2003. In May 2003, we announced that our mid-sized corporate clients business, which we had previously included as part of our Corporates & Markets division, would be integrated into our Private & Business Clients division, effective October 2003, to serve our mid-sized corporate clients more efficiently. COST-CUTTING AND RESTRUCTURING MEASURES In 2002, in order to increase operating efficiency and cut costs in our banking segment, Dresdner Bank supplemented its existing restructuring programs introduced in 2000 and 2001 with new initiatives affecting major parts of its banking operations. For these combined initiatives, Dresdner Bank has announced plans to eliminate an aggregate of approximately 11,000 positions and to significantly improve the operating efficiency of Dresdner Bank by 2004. An aggregate of approximately 7,050 positions had been eliminated under these initiatives as of December 31, 2002. We believe that we have made significant progress in 2002 toward reaching these goals, and we intend to continue striving in 2003 toward the successful completion of our cost-cutting initiatives. In order to align costs more closely with the two major operating divisions of our banking segment, in 2002 we recorded restructuring charges associated with our cost-cutting and restructuring plans within the respective operating divisions of our banking segment. Restructuring charges originally reflected in net income of our Other division in 2001 have accordingly been reclassified to our Private and Business Clients division and our Corporates & Markets division in order to facilitate comparison with the presentation of such charges in 2002. For additional information on restructuring charges recorded in 2002, see "-- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Other Expenses." For additional information on restructuring charges generally, see also Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements. The principal cost-cutting and restructuring measures implemented in 2002 were as follows: - In September 2002, we announced further initiatives involving the elimination of an additional approximately 3,000 positions in our banking segment, including approximately 2,100 positions in our Corporates & Markets division, 300 positions in our Private and Business Clients division and 600 positions in our Other division. The goal of the initiatives is to further reduce administrative expenses without reducing operating income. In connection with the elimination of the first 1,500 of these positions, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately E199 million in 2002. We recorded an additional approximately E8 million in charges associated with the termination of a further 111 of these 3,000 positions in the first half of 2003. We expect to record the remaining charges 81 under these plans when such charges qualify under IFRS. Approximately 1,050 employees had been terminated pursuant to these plans as of April 30, 2003. - In April 2002, as part of our ongoing cost-cutting measures, we announced the elimination of an additional approximately 200 positions in our Corporates & Markets division. Costs associated with eliminating these positions of approximately E17 million were recorded within Acquisition costs and administrative expenses in 2002 without establishing restructuring provisions. All 200 of these positions had been eliminated as of December 31, 2002. See "-- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses." Over the course of 2002, we also continued to implement the comprehensive restructuring plans introduced by Dresdner Bank in 2001 and 2000 to reduce administrative expenses: - In September 2001, we announced plans involving an aggregate reduction of approximately 1,300 positions throughout our banking segment. In the course of 2001, only our restructuring plans at our German subsidiaries were sufficiently detailed to qualify for restructuring charges to be recorded under IFRS. Pursuant to such qualifying plans, we recorded charges of E31 million in 2001 for the elimination of approximately 240 positions in branch and support functions at our German subsidiaries. Pursuant to plans that qualified for restructuring charges in 2002, we recorded further charges of E73 million in connection with the elimination of approximately 1,000 positions. In addition, we expect to record charges for the elimination of the approximately 60 remaining positions in 2003 when such charges qualify under IFRS. Of the 1,300 positions to be eliminated under these plans, approximately 900 positions had been eliminated as of April 30, 2003. - In 2001, in connection with the reorganization of our Corporates & Markets division discussed above (see "-- Reorganization of Business Divisions"), we recorded charges of approximately E118 million for the elimination of approximately 1,500 positions, primarily in front and back office support functions. Additional charges of approximately E6 million associated with the reorganization were recorded in 2002 to reflect a revised estimate of costs associated with leased property. For additional information on the restructuring charges recorded in 2001, see "-- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Other Expenses." Of the 1,500 positions to be reduced under this reorganization, all 1,500 had been eliminated as of December 31, 2002. - In 2000, Dresdner Bank announced a restructuring plan calling for consolidation of its German branch network and related back-office activities in Germany, including closing approximately 300 of our German branches, and the discontinuation of commercial lending activities outside of Europe that are not directly related to investment banking, by 2004. These measures included aggregate job cuts of approximately 5,000 employees. Restructuring charges for the plan were initially recorded by Dresdner Bank in 2000, with further charges of approximately E10 million recognized during 2002. Of the charges recorded in 2000, we recorded releases of E76 million in 2002 and E5 million in 2001. The releases recorded in 2002 reflected primarily a decision not to implement plans to relocate certain banking operations in New York and changes in estimates of costs associated with the consolidation of back-office functions in Germany. The releases recorded in 2001 were attributable to changes in estimates of employee termination costs in connection with the discontinuation of our commercial lending activities outside Europe. As a result of this plan, we reduced the total number of German branch locations from approximately 1,350 at December 31, 1999 to approximately 1,000 at December 31, 2002. Of the aggregate 5,000 positions to be eliminated under this plan, approximately 4,200 positions had been eliminated as of April 30, 2003. In February 2003, as part of the continued reorganization of our business structure to focus on our two operating divisions, we announced the closure of our wholly owned subsidiary 82 Lombardkasse AG (or Lombardkasse), a broker-dealer specializing in securities custody and clearing transactions. The closure was effective in February 2003 and involved the termination of approximately 80 employees. Charges of approximately E40 million were recorded within other expenses in 2002 in connection with the termination of certain service contracts associated with the closure. See "-- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001 -- Other Expenses." In addition, in February 2003, as part of our efforts to focus on the Allianz and Dresdner Bank brands, we announced plans to integrate the activities of our direct banking subsidiary Advance Bank and Financial Planner into the Allianz Group in 2003. We plan to incorporate the approximately 900 employees of Advance Bank and Financial Planner into the joint sales network of Allianz and Dresdner Bank. In connection with this initiative, we estimate that we may record total charges of approximately E70 million. We had approximately 47,000 employees at December 31, 2002 in our banking segment, compared to approximately 52,300 employees (including part-time employees and employees on leave) at December 31, 2001. COMPETITION We are subject to intense competition in all aspects of our banking business from both bank and non-bank institutions that provide financial services and, in some of our activities, from government agencies. Substantial competition exists among a large number of commercial banks, savings banks, other public sector banks, brokers and dealers, investment banking firms, insurance companies, investment advisors, mutual funds and hedge funds to provide the types of banking products and services that we offer in our banking operations. In our Private and Business Clients division, our main competitors are Deutsche Bank, HypoVereinsbank, Commerzbank, Citibank and German savings and cooperative banks. In our Corporates & Markets division, our main competitors for large multinational corporate and financial institution clients are Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and Commerzbank, while our main competitors for medium-sized corporate clients are Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank and HypoVereinsbank, as well as German public state banks and savings and cooperative banks. Competition is based on a number of factors, including distribution systems, transaction execution, products and services, innovation, reputation and price. In recent years, we have generally experienced intensifying price competition as competitors have sought to increase their market share. We believe this trend will continue. 83 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth certain financial information for our banking operations for the years indicated. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 ---------------------------- 2002 2001(1) 2000 ------- ------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Interest and similar income................................. 13,336 9,085 1,502 Income (net) from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures, and associated enterprises................ 2,071(2) 1,016 122 Other income from investments............................... 1,430 628 25 Trading income.............................................. 1,081 244 7 Fee and commission income, and income resulting from service activities................................................ 2,925 1,474 2 Other income................................................ 432 308 64 ------- ------- ------ Total income.............................................. 21,275 12,755 1,722 ------- ------- ------ Interest and similar expenses............................... (9,509) (6,766) (1,257) Other expenses for investments.............................. (2,225) (465) (33) Loan loss provisions........................................ (2,222) (588) (21) Acquisition costs and administrative expenses............... (7,581) (3,446) (170) Amortization of goodwill.................................... (241) (70) 8 Other expenses.............................................. (1,034) (1,193) (125) ------- ------- ------ Total expenses............................................ (22,812) (12,528) (1,598) ------- ------- ------ Earnings from ordinary activities before taxation........... (1,537) 227 124 Taxes....................................................... 154 6 67 Minority interests in earnings.............................. 25 (453) (90) ------- ------- ------ Net income (loss)........................................... (1,358) (220) 101 ======= ======= ====== --------------- (1) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. (2) Includes a realized gain of E1,912 million resulting from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. See "-- Asset Management Operations." The gain on this transfer was eliminated at the Group level. In addition, this item includes a realized gain of E244 million resulting from the merger of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo in August 2002. See "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 In the following section, we discuss the consolidated results of our banking operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. This discussion focuses on factors and trends that affected our consolidated banking results for the full year 2002 compared to the part-year period after our acquisition of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001, since our banking operations prior to our acquisition of Dresdner Bank were not significant. As discussed below, our banking results in 2002 were significantly affected by the merger into Eurohypo and deconsolidation on August 1, 2002 of our former mortgage banking subsidiary Deutsche Hyp (see "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate"), as well as the E1,912 million of realized gains recorded in connection with the transfer in August 2002 of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM (see "-- Asset Management Operations"). 84 Net interest and current income. We measure interest and current income in our banking operations on a net basis. Net interest and current income consists of interest and similar income, income from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises, less interest and similar expenses. The following table shows net interest and current income and its income statement components for the years indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------ 2002 2001(1) ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Interest and similar income................................. 13,336 9,085 Income (net) from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises................. 2,071(2) 1,016 Interest and similar expenses............................... (9,509) (6,766) ------- ------ Net interest and current income........................ 5,898 3,335 ======= ====== --------------- (1) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. (2) Includes a realized gain of E1,912 million resulting from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. See "-- Asset Management Operations." The gain on this transfer was eliminated at the Group level. In addition, this item includes a realized gain of E244 million resulting from the merger of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo in August 2002. See "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." Interest and similar income consists primarily of income from loans and advances to banks and to customers and investment securities. Interest and similar income from our banking operations was E13,336 million in 2002, reflecting primarily a decrease of approximately E79,700 million, or approximately 19%, of our average interest-earning assets due to the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp as of August 1, 2002 and decreasing interest yields in the major markets in which we operate. Of this amount, income from loans and advances to customers accounted for E7,092 million. Interest and similar income on loans and advances to customers was adversely affected by both a decrease in average interest yields and a decrease in average volume due primarily to the deconsolidation in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp, which affected primarily our German operations. Income from lending and money market transactions was E1,073 million, substantially all of which related to transactions with banks. Interest income from lending and money market transactions was also adversely affected by both a decrease in average interest yields and a decrease in average volume. Interest and similar income from investment securities was E2,232 million, consisting primarily of income from fixed-interest government securities of E1,951 million and corporate debt securities of E50 million, reflecting the significance of fixed-income securities in our portfolio despite decreased volume in our German operations due to the deconsolidation in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp. Dividends from equity securities, which are included in interest and similar income, were E206 million, reflecting primarily a decline in investments in equity securities. Net income from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises, which consists primarily of realized gains and losses from the disposition of such investments, was E2,071 million in 2002, reflecting primarily a realized gain of E1,912 million resulting from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. See "-- Asset Management Operations." The gain on this transfer was eliminated at the Group level. In addition, net income from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises included a realized gain of E244 million 85 resulting from the merger of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo in August 2002. See "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." Interest and similar expense consists primarily of interest expense on certificated liabilities, deposits, repurchase agreements and derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. Interest and similar expense was E9,509 million in 2002, consisting primarily of interest expense of E4,075 million on deposits, E3,633 million on certificated liabilities, consisting of long-term bonds and certificated money-market instruments, as well as long-term subordinated liabilities (E578 million) and profit participation certificates (E133 million), which reflected in each case the impact of a general decline in interest rates as well as declining volumes. The decline in volumes was due primarily to a decrease of approximately E76,200 million, or 21%, in our average interest-bearing liabilities due to the deconsolidation in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp and reduced funding requirements as a result of reduced lending activities. The impact of the deconsolidation was particularly evident in certificated liabilities and in liabilities to customers. Other interest expense was E1,090 million. Net interest and current income from our banking operations was E5,898 million in 2002, reflecting primarily decreased interest and similar income due to lower interest rates and decreased lending volumes, which were more than offset by income from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises of E2,071 million, reflecting realized gains from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM (E1,912 million) and the merger in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo (E244 million), as well as decreased interest and similar expense due to decreased average liability volumes and lower average interest rates. We define our net interest spread and our net interest margin by reference to the information set forth in "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations -- Average Balance Sheet and Interest Rate Data." Our net interest spread, which consists of the difference between the average interest rate earned on average interest-earning assets of 4.0% and the average interest rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities of 3.7%, was 0.3% in 2002, reflecting an overall reduction in interest income from higher-yielding loans to customers and investment securities, due primarily to the deconsolidation in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp, reduced lending volumes and an overall decline in the interest rate environment. Our net interest margin, which we define as net interest income, including net interest income on trading assets and trading liabilities, as a percentage of average interest-earning assets, was 0.7% in 2002. For further information concerning the net interest spread and net interest margin in our banking business for 2002 and prior years, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operation -- Net Interest Margin." Other Income from Investments. Other income from investments consists primarily of realized gains on investments. Other income from investments was E1,430 million in 2002, primarily as a result of E1,265 million of realized gains on the disposition of equity securities available for sale, including intercompany transfers to reposition equity investments within the Group in the course of 2002, and an additional E116 million on the disposition of government debt securities available for sale. The gains on these intercompany transfers were eliminated at the Group level. Trading Income. Trading income comprises mainly realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading in interest and equity products, foreign exchange and precious metals, and the effects of derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting. Trading income is net of interest expense and includes both proprietary trading revenues and margins realized from trades made on behalf of customers. Trading income was E1,081 million in 2002, reflecting primarily the full-year consolidation of Dresdner Bank in 2002 and a significant increase in trading income from interest products such as government bonds and corporate bonds, as well as derivatives on interest products. Trading income from interest products was E738 million in 2002, 86 reflecting an increase in the trading volume of interest products due to ongoing weakness in the equity securities markets. Income from trading in equity products was a loss of E49 million. Income from foreign exchange and precious metals trading was E301 million, while income from the effects of derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting declined to E90 million, reflecting the decrease in income from derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting and are therefore recorded at fair value. Gains or losses on such financial instruments arising from valuation at fair value are included in trading income. For additional information on trading income in our banking operations, see Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements. Fee and Commission Income, and Income from Service Activities. Fee and commission income, and income from service activities from our banking operations comprises mainly fees and commissions from our securities, lending, transaction banking, underwriting and mergers and acquisitions advisory businesses. Fee and commission income, and income from service activities was E2,925 million in 2002. Fee and commission income from our securities business was E1,066 million for this period, reflecting decreased transaction volume in our equity products business due to the continuing reluctance of German clients to engage in equity securities transactions in light of market conditions. Fee and commission income from our mergers and acquisitions advisory businesses (E252 million) and our underwriting business (E104 million) also was negatively affected as a result of slowing market activity in the underwriting and advisory businesses in 2002. In addition, fee and commission income included commission income on account and payment transactions (E390 million), insurance, real estate and other brokerage commissions (E232 million), commissions earned from lending (E196 million), commissions earned for asset management products from third-party customers (E207 million) and commissions earned from our ADAM segment for marketing and selling their asset management products (E113 million). Other Income. Other income from our banking operations was E432 million, consisting primarily of income from releasing or reducing miscellaneous accrued liabilities (E53 million), non-trading foreign currency transaction gains (E36 million), gains from disposals of fixed assets (E28 million) and other income (E279 million). Other Expenses for Investments. Other expenses for investments from our banking operations consist of realized losses and impairment writedowns on securities and other investments. Other expenses for investments were E2,225 million in 2002, reflecting E1,129 million of impairment writedowns, primarily on equity securities, and E1,096 million of realized losses, mainly on investments in equity securities. The realized losses on equity securities reflected primarily realized losses on two major shareholdings as part of intercompany transfers to reposition equity investments within the Group in the course of 2002. The losses on intercompany transfers were eliminated at the Group level. Loan Loss Provisions. Loan loss provisions in our banking operations consists of specific loan loss provisions, country loan loss provisions and general loan loss provisions. In addition, provisions for contingent liabilities relating to our lending business are included in this category. We establish specific loan loss provisions if we consider it probable that specifically identified borrowers are no longer able to make their contractually agreed upon interest and principal payments. We establish general loss provisions to provide for incurred but unidentified losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio as of the relevant balance sheet date. We establish country risk provisions for transfer risk, which is a measure of the likely ability of a borrower in a certain country to repay its foreign currency-denominated debt in light of the economic or political situation prevailing in that country, on the basis of our country rating system that incorporates current and historical economic, political and other data to categorize countries by risk profile. For the year ended December 31, 2002, additions to net loan loss provisions in our banking segment were E2,222 million, consisting of E3,106 million of new provisions, offset in part primarily by releases of E810 million of existing provisions and recoveries of E74 million. 87 We recorded new specific loan loss provisions of E2,889 million in 2002, of which E2,151 million related to corporate borrowers, particularly in the telecommunications, media and construction sectors, reflecting the continued weakness in the global economy, deteriorating credit quality of borrowers and increased insolvencies. We also recorded specific provisions of E665 million relating to private individuals and E73 million relating to banks. Country loan loss provisions were a net release of E97 million in 2002, reflecting releases of E208 million, due primarily to country upgrades, decreased lending volumes and other reductions of exposures subject to country risk provisions, offset in part by increased provisions of E111 million primarily relating to exposures in Brazil. Net general loan loss provisions were E89 million in 2002, based primarily on historical loss experience and management's assessment of the credit quality of the loan portfolio caused by the deteriorating condition of the global economy. Of the additional net loan loss provisions of E2,222 million in 2002, we recorded E1,592 million in our Corporates & Markets division, primarily in Germany, Latin America and the United States, E561 million in our Private and Business Clients divisions, primarily in Germany, and E69 million in our Other division. A total of approximately E1,259 million of the net specific loan loss provisions in 2002 related to borrowers in Germany. The continuing weakness in the loan portfolio of our banking segment is evidenced by the increase in our non-performing loans and potential problem loans in 2002. For additional information on non-performing loans and potential problem loans, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations -- Risk Elements." At December 31, 2001, our non-performing loans and potential problem loans were E13,655 million and E2,876 million, respectively, which included approximately E3,306 million of non-performing loans and E670 million of potential problem loans, respectively, attributable to the loan portfolio of Deutsche Hyp. Excluding Deutsche Hyp, at December 31, 2001, our non-performing loans and potential problem loans were E10,349 million and E2,206 million, respectively. At December 31, 2002, following the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp on August 1, 2002, our non-performing loans and potential problem loans were E11,625 million and E2,437 million, respectively. On a comparable basis, excluding loans attributable to Deutsche Hyp, these amounts represented a net increase of E1,276 million, or 12.3%, in non-performing loans and E231 million, or 10.5%, in potential problem loans from year-end 2001. At December 31, 2002, the ratio of the total allowances for loan losses to total loans was approximately 5.2%, while the ratio of the total allowances for loan losses to total non-performing loans was approximately 59.9%, in each case reflecting the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp. These percentages represented an increase from the corresponding ratio of 4.5% and a decrease from the corresponding ratio of 68.5%, respectively, at December 31, 2001, on a comparable basis excluding loans and allowances for loan losses attributable to Deutsche Hyp. Since 2000, Dresdner Bank has charged off loans when, based on management's judgment, all economically sensible means of recover have been exhausted. Prior to 2000, Dresdner Bank charged off loans only when all legal means of recovery had been exhausted. This change in practice has affected both the timing and amount of charge-offs in the years 2000 to 2002, and in 2002 also affected the level of our non-accrual loans. In 2002, our banking segment's gross charge-offs were E1,889 million. See "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to the Our Banking Operations -- Summary of Loan Loss Experience." To reduce our exposure to credit risks, we have taken a variety of steps in 2002 and 2003, including reducing our loans to corporate borrowers in the United States, Argentina and Brazil. In addition, in 2003, we began the process of reorganizing certain performing loans to non-strategic customers, non-performing loans and certain other non-strategic assets into the IRU. See "-- Reorganization of Business Divisions." For additional information, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations -- Summary of Loan Loss Experience." Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses in our banking segment, which consist primarily of personnel expenses and operating 88 expenses, were E7,581 million in 2002. Personnel expenses amounted to E4,335 million, reflecting primarily decreased wages and salary expenses, social security and pension expenses due to a reduction in headcount as a result of our ongoing cost-cutting and restructuring measures and the expiration of the bonus and retention agreements with Dresdner Bank executives and key management personnel made after merger negotiations with Deutsche Bank in 2000. These decreases were offset in part by continuing bonus and retention payments made in connection with the acquisition of Wasserstein Perella & Co. in January 2001. Bonus and retention payments recorded in 2002 amounted in the aggregate to E1,058 million. Operating expenses were E3,246 million, consisting mainly of occupancy-related costs (E1,263 million), depreciation expenses (E395 million), fee and commission expenses (E267 million), marketing and advertising expenses (E249 million), expenses for amortization of software and other intangible assets (E235 million), travel expenses (E143 million), consulting fees (E134 million), training costs (E125 million) and other operating expenses (E435 million). For a discussion of our restructuring program to reduce administrative expenses, see "-- Cost-Cutting and Restructuring Measures." Amortization of Goodwill. Amortization of goodwill in our banking operations was E241 million in 2002, attributable primarily to the acquisition of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements. Other Expenses. Other expenses from our banking operations were E1,034 million in 2002, reflecting primarily restructuring charges of E245 million, and writedowns of E202 million relating to an investment in a real estate property owned by Dresdner Bank, as well as other expenses of E587 million, including E40 million of costs recorded in connection with the termination of certain service contracts associated with the closure of Lombardkasse. Restructuring charges recorded in 2002 consisted primarily of charges relating to cost-cutting measures in our Corporates & Markets division (E288 million), offset in part by releases of E87 million from restructuring plans initiated by Dresdner Bank in 2001 and 2000. For a discussion of our restructuring programs, see "-- Cost Cutting and Restructuring Measures." See also Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements. Taxes. Taxes on our banking segment amounted to a tax credit of E154 million in 2002. The tax benefit was due to tax losses, for which a deferred tax asset was recognized. Minority Interests in Earnings. Minority interests in our banking segment were a credit of E25 million in 2002. Net Income. Net income for our banking operations was a loss of E1,358 million in 2002, reflecting the continued weakness in the capital markets and the deteriorating credit quality of borrowers in Germany and our other major markets. The loss was attributable primarily to a significant decline in income in conjunction with a high level of net loan loss provisions (E2,222 million), writedowns on investment securities (E1,129 million) and realized losses on investment securities (E1,096 million), offset in part by realized gains from the transfer of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM (E1,912 million), the merger of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo (E244 million) and realized gains on equity securities (E1,265 million), as well as a tax credit (E154 million). Although we were able to reduce administrative expenses significantly over the course of 2002 as a result of cost-cutting and restructuring measures (see "-- Cost Cutting and Restructuring Measures"), the reduction in costs was not sufficient to offset the decline in income. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 In the following section, we discuss the consolidated results of our banking operations for the year ended December 31, 2001. This discussion focuses on factors and trends that affected our consolidated banking results after our acquisition of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001, since our banking operations prior to our acquisition of Dresdner Bank were not significant. 89 Net interest and current income. We measure interest and current income in our banking operations on a net basis. The following table shows net interest and current income and its income statement components for the years indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------- 2001(1) 2000 ------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Interest and similar income................................. 9,085 1,502 Income (net) from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises................. 1,016 122 Interest and similar expenses............................... (6,766) (1,257) ------ ------ Net interest and current income........................ 3,335 367 ====== ====== --------------- (1) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. Interest and similar income from our banking operations was E9,085 million in 2001, reflecting primarily declining interest rates and decreasing loan balances, offset in part by increased income from other interest-bearing instruments. Of this amount, income from loans accounted for E5,566 million, reflecting our reduction of non-core commercial lending activities outside of Europe, together with intense competition for borrowers in most areas of lending. Income from lending and money market transactions was E1,908 million, of which E1,472 million related to increased volume of reverse repurchase agreements. Interest income from securities available for sale was E1,291 million, consisting primarily of income from fixed-interest government securities (E1,148 million), reflecting an increase in the volume of such securities in our portfolio. Net income from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises was E1,016 million in 2001, reflecting primarily realized gains of E866 million from the sale of equity holdings in Munich Re in connection with our acquisition of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001. For additional information on our disposition of ordinary shares of Munich Re in 2001, see "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Transaction with Munich Re." Interest and similar expense was E6,766 million in 2001, consisting primarily of interest expense of E3,837 million on certificated liabilities, including long-term bonds and long-term subordinated liabilities, which reflected the impact of declining interest rates. Interest expense on deposits and from repurchase agreements was E2,079 million, reflecting primarily an increase with respect to repurchase agreements in the volume of short term transactions due to uncertain economic conditions, as well as a slight increase in the average balance of deposits from customers, particularly non-German corporate clients, offset in part by a decrease in deposits from banks. Net interest and current income from our banking operations amounted to E3,335 million in 2001. Excluding our sale of a part of our shareholding in Munich Re, there was a downward trend in net interest and current income in 2001 due to a shift in the second half of the year from corporate and customer lending to lower-yielding reverse repurchase agreements and investment securities and a shift in funding from deposits from banks to repurchase agreements. Our net interest spread was 0.36% in 2001, reflecting a change in the mix of interest income from higher-yielding loans to customers to lower-yielding reverse repurchase agreements and trading assets, and a change in the mix of funding from higher-yielding deposits from banks to lower-yielding repurchase agreements. Our net interest margin was 0.45% in 2001. In each case, our net interest spread and margin reflect income and expense from Dresdner Bank only for the 90 period from July 23, 2001 to December 31, 2001, calculated as a percentage of the average assets for such period. For a discussion of the interest spread and margin in our banking business for the full year 2001 and prior years, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operation -- Net Interest Margin." Other Income from Investments. Other income from investments amounted to E628 million in 2001, primarily as a result of E406 million of realized gains on the disposition of equity securities available for sale, including primarily shareholdings of Dresdner Bank, and an additional E92 million on the disposition of government debt securities available for sale. Trading Income. Trading income was E244 million in 2001, reflecting primarily income from other dealings in derivative financial instruments of E177 million, net of trading interest expense. Income from securities trading was E67 million, reflecting gains from foreign exchange and bond trading which more than offset losses in the equity trading portfolio. For additional information on trading income in our banking operations, see Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements. Fee and Commission Income, and Income from Service Activities. Fee and commission income, and income from service activities amounted to E1,474 million in 2001. Fee and commission income from our securities business was E623 million for this period, reflecting decreased transaction volume in our mutual fund and equity securities businesses due to the reluctance of German clients to engage in securities transactions. Fee and commission income from our lending, underwriting and mergers and acquisitions advisory businesses of E213 million, also was negatively affected as a result of slowing market activity in the underwriting and advisory businesses in 2001. In addition, fee and commission income included commission income on account and payment transactions (E176 million), insurance and real estate commissions (E76 million), and commissions earned from our asset management segment (E194 million). Other Income. Other income from our banking operations in 2001 was E308 million. Other Expenses for Investments. Other expenses for investments were E465 million in 2001, reflecting primarily E340 million of realized losses, mainly on investments in equity securities and E125 million of impairment writedowns. The realized losses on equity securities reflected primarily realized losses on shareholdings of Dresdner Bank. Loan Loss Provisions. For the year ended December 31, 2001, net loan loss provisions in our banking segment were E588 million, consisting of E1,197 million of new provisions, offset in part primarily by releases of E593 million of existing provisions. Provisions for loan losses in 2001 significantly exceeded expectations in both our German and non-German loan portfolios, due primarily to the continuing deterioration of the global economy. In our Dresdner Bank operations, we added specific loan loss provisions of E562 million for corporate borrowers and E308 million for private clients. All of our private client provisions and the majority of our corporate provisions were incurred in respect of German borrowers. A substantial part of our non-German corporate provisions in 2001 were incurred in the United States, including approximately E100 million related to one corporate borrower. We recorded net general loss provisions of E33 million in 2001, based primarily on historical loss experience and management's assessment of the credit quality of the loan portfolio caused by the deteriorating condition of the global economy, and released net country risk provisions of E92 million. To reduce our loan loss exposure, we took a variety of steps in 2001, including reducing our loans to corporate borrowers in the United States by approximately 25% for the year ended December 31, 2001. To manage country risk, we also reduced our loan exposure in Latin American and other problem loan countries, including Argentina, which helped to reduce the impact on our banking operations of the Argentine financial crisis in late 2001. For additional information, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations -- Summary of Loan Loss Experience." 91 Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses in our banking segment were E3,446 million in 2001. Personnel expenses amounted to E2,045 million, reflecting primarily wages and salary expenses, social security and pension expenses and bonus and retention payments made to Dresdner Bank executives and key management personnel pursuant to agreements made after merger negotiations with Deutsche Bank in 2000 and in connection with the acquisition of Wasserstein Perella & Co. in January 2001. Bonus and retention payments recorded in 2001 amounted in the aggregate to E744 million, of which E462 million were recorded in acquisition costs and administrative expenses and E282 million in other expenses. See "-- Other Expenses." Operating expenses were E1,401 million, consisting mainly of rental expenses (E376 million), depreciation expenses (E205 million), fee and commission expenses (E184 million), marketing and advertising expenses (E151 million), training and outsourcing expenses (E92 million) and travel expenses (E84 million). For a discussion of our restructuring program to reduce administrative expenses, see "-- Cost-Cutting and Restructuring Measures." Amortization of Goodwill. Amortization of goodwill in our banking operations was E70 million in 2001, attributable primarily to the acquisition of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001. Other Expenses. Other expenses from our banking operations were E1,193 million in 2001, reflecting primarily charges of E206 million recorded in connection with the integration of Dresdner Bank into the Allianz Group, restructuring charges of E132 million, expenses for amortization of software and other intangible assets of E119 million and consulting fees of E60 million. Other expenses also included bonus and retention payments of E282 million; we recorded the additional bonus and retention payments noted above in acquisition costs and administrative expenses. The integration costs of E206 million comprised mainly consulting costs of E98 million and other non-staff costs of E95 million relating primarily to integration of information technology systems. We recorded additional charges in connection with the integration of Dresdner Bank at Allianz AG, the results of which are shown in our property-casualty business segment. See "-- Insurance Operations -- Property-Casualty Insurance Operations -- Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000 -- Acquisition Costs and Administrative Expenses." Restructuring charges recorded in 2001 consisted primarily of charges relating to the reorganization of our Corporates & Markets division (E118 million) and other German subsidiaries (E31 million), offset in part by releases of E17 million from restructuring plans initiated in May 2000. For a discussion of our restructuring programs, see "-- Cost Cutting and Restructuring Measures." See also Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements. Taxes. Taxes on our banking operations amounted to a tax credit of E6 million in 2001. The tax benefit was due to tax losses, for which a deferred tax asset was recognized. Taxable income was reduced by tax-exempt capital gains. Minority Interests in Earnings. Minority interests in our banking operations were E453 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the application of the minority interest ownership in Dresdner Bank during the period ended December 31, 2001 to the historical cost basis of Dresdner Bank. Net Income. Net income for our banking operations was a loss of E220 million in 2001, reflecting the weakness in the capital markets, particularly in the second half of 2001. The loss was attributable primarily to reduced fee and commission income (E1,474 million), due primarily to decreased transaction volume attributable to clients' general reluctance to engage in securities transactions, in combination with a high level of net loan loss provisions (E588 million). At the same time, administrative expenses were high (E3,446 million), due largely to high personnel costs and bonus and retention payments, and we incurred significant other expenses (E1,193 million), primarily in connection with the integration of Dresdner Bank into the Allianz Group and the implementation of measures to restructure our banking segment as discussed above. See "-- Cost Cutting and Restructuring Measures." 92 BANKING OPERATIONS BY DIVISION We conduct our banking operations through two principal operating business divisions, Private and Business Clients and Corporates & Markets. Our Other division includes income and expense items that are not attributable to one of our operating divisions. The following tables set forth certain key data concerning our banking operations by division and by geographic region for the years indicated. Consistent with our general practice, net revenue by division, and total income and net revenue by geographic region are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different geographic regions and different segments, and net income by geographic region is presented before those consolidation adjustments, amortization of goodwill and minority interests. Net income by division is presented before amortization of goodwill and minority interests. BANKING OPERATIONS -- KEY DATA BY DIVISION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------ 2002(1) 2001(2) 2000 ------------------- ---------------------- ------------------- NET NET NET NET NET NET REVENUE(3) INCOME REVENUE(3) INCOME(4) REVENUE(3) INCOME ---------- ------ ---------- --------- ---------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Private and Business Clients(5).................... 3,227 (304) 1,678 (160) -- -- Corporates & Markets(5)......... 3,598 (1,642) 1,725 (797) -- -- Other(5)........................ 2,349 804 1,861 1,260 432 183 ----- ------ ----- ----- --- --- Subtotal........................ 9,174 (1,142) 5,264 303 432 183 ----- ------ ----- ----- --- --- Amortization of goodwill........ -- (241) -- (70) -- 8 Minority Interests.............. -- 25 -- (453) -- (90) ----- ------ ----- ----- --- --- Total........................... 9,174 (1,358) 5,264 (220) 432 101 ===== ====== ===== ===== === === --------------- (1) Includes a realized gain of E1,912 million resulting from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. See "-- Asset Management Operations." The gain on this transfer was eliminated at the Group level. In addition, includes a realized gain of E244 million resulting from the merger of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohyp in August 2002. See "-- Other -- Description of Business -- Real Estate." (2) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. (3) Consists of total income less interest and similar expenses, other expenses for investments, fees and commission expenses and other investment-related expenses. (4) Restructuring charges of E14 million and E95 million originally reflected in net income of our Other division have been reclassified to our Private and Business Clients division and our Corporates & Markets division, respectively, to facilitate comparison with the presentation of such charges in 2002. In addition, integration charges of E44 million and E16 million originally reflected in Net income of our Other division have been reclassified to our Private and Business Clients division and our Corporates & Markets division, respectively, to facilitate comparison with the presentation of such charges in 2002. (5) In order to facilitate comparison with the presentation of amounts in 2002, amounts for 2001 have been reclassified to reflect the integration effective January 1, 2002 of our small business operations, which we had previously included as part of our Corporates & Markets division, with our former Private Clients division to form our new Private and Business Clients division. 93 BANKING OPERATIONS -- KEY DATA BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION(1) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2002 2001(2) 2000 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- TOTAL NET NET TOTAL NET NET TOTAL NET NET INCOME REVENUE(3) INCOME INCOME REVENUE(3) INCOME INCOME REVENUE(3) INCOME ------ ---------- ------ ------ ---------- ------ ------ ---------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Germany.............. 15,976 7,059 1,858 12,515 6,227 1,931 144 70 2 Rest of Europe....... 6,687 1,177 (999) 3,853 1,451 (434) 1,444 331 166 NAFTA................ 2,483 755 (1,527) 984 572 (218) -- -- -- Rest of World........ 1,164 206 (474) 544 245 (106) 134 31 15 Consolidation adjustments(4)..... (5,035) (23) -- (5,141) (3,231) (870) -- -- -- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- --- --- Total.............. 21,275 9,174 (1,142) 12,755 5,264 303 1,722 432 183 ====== ===== ====== ====== ====== ===== ===== === === --------------- (1) Represents the location of the entity or branch that recorded the transaction. (2) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. (3) Consists of total income (less interest and similar expenses, other expenses for investments, fees and commission expenses, other investment-related expenses). (4) Represents elimination of intercompany transactions between Group companies in different geographic regions. PRIVATE AND BUSINESS CLIENTS DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS We serve our private and small business customers through our Private and Business Clients division. In 2002, our Private and Business Clients division accounted for approximately 35.2% of our net revenue from banking operations. Our Private and Business Clients business is one of our two core banking activities. We believe that rising levels of private wealth, increasing emphasis on private retirement provision and an interest in equity securities and investment funds are increasing long-term demand not only in Germany, but throughout Europe for sophisticated, individualized investment and private retirement provision advice. Focusing on structured investment and private retirement provision advice is a core element of our Private and Business Clients strategy. Our Private and Business Clients operations also continue to grow in importance for the distribution of investment banking, asset management and insurance products. We aim to bundle our banking know-how to provide private individual and small business clients with similar advisory requirements with an all-around selection of products and services for their business as well as private financial needs. In 2002, we provided Private and Business Clients banking products and services to approximately 5.7 million customers with more than E49 billion of deposits and more than E93 billion of assets held under custody. Our Private and Business Clients customer base consists of high net worth customers worldwide, individual customers in Germany (including affluent customers) and small business customers. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES We offer a wide range of banking, asset management and insurance products and services for high net worth, affluent and other private individual customers. For our high net worth customers, we offer sophisticated, personalized solutions through Dresdner Private Banking 94 International. Our services include advisory and discretionary portfolio management, fund-based portfolio management, administration of trusts and estates and structural asset analysis, including tax planning. For our affluent customers, we provide structured financial advice based on a variety of financial planning and investment tools and products, such as mutual funds, mutual fund portfolio management, tax-advantaged products and alternative investments. For our other private individual customers, our banking products and services include deposit-taking, the transmission of payments, commercial and consumer lending, mortgage lending and other property-related financing services, credit card operations, securities brokerage and asset management services and insurance. For our small business customers, we provide comprehensive financial advice for their private and business needs, including assistance with credit facilities and securities investment, company pension scheme and insurance products and services. We allocate fees between our banking segment and our asset management and insurance segments in the case of cross-segment sales and distribution activities, e.g., the sale of proprietary fund products or insurance policies through our Private and Business Client distribution channels. DISTRIBUTION In our Private and Business Clients division, we distribute our products primarily through our branch bank network and our on-site securities advisors, as well as our network of ATMs. We also offer our banking products and services through a variety of other Internet and electronic banking channels, Allianz Group insurance agencies and call centers. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net Revenue. Net revenue in our Private and Business Clients division was E3,227 million in 2002, reflecting primarily flat net interest and current income and fee and commission income, despite the weakness in the capital markets, due primarily to the successful introduction of new products. Net Income. Net income in our Private and Business Clients division amounted to a loss of E304 million in 2002, primarily as a result of flat income, in combination with a high level of loan loss provisions relating to German borrowers, offset in part by reduced administrative expenses. The increase in loan loss provisions was attributable in part to the inclusion in 2002 in our Private and Business Clients division of small business customers, whose credit quality continued to deteriorate during the year. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net Revenue. Net revenue in our Private and Business Clients division was E1,678 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the downward trend in net fee and commission income due to decreased transaction volume attributable to German clients' reluctance to engage in securities transactions. Net Income. Net income in our Private and Business Clients division amounted to a loss of E160 million in 2001, primarily as a result of declining net fee and commission income, in combination with a high level of loan loss provisions relating to German borrowers. 95 CORPORATES & MARKETS DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS We serve our corporate and capital markets customers through our Corporates & Markets division, into which we combined our former investment banking and corporate clients business divisions in 2001. Through this combination, we aim to take advantage of our access to corporate Europe, our strong credit rating, our extensive capital markets experience around the world and our strong position in Germany and the United Kingdom. In 2002, our Corporates & Markets division accounted for approximately 39.2% of our net revenue from banking operations. Our Corporates & Markets division is focused on raising capital for corporate and institutional customers in our core markets of Germany, the United Kingdom and other countries in Western Europe and the United States. We offer a wide range of investment banking, commercial banking and other capital markets products and services to our Corporates & Markets customers. Our customer base consists of approximately 20,000 client groups, most of which are domiciled in Germany. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Our Corporates & Markets division offers corporate finance advisory services on mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings and other strategic matters, securities underwriting and market making, securities and derivatives trading, portfolio management, custodial services, and other capital markets products and services. We also provide corporate loans, take deposits, and provide our corporate customers with payment, management consulting, real estate and other corporate banking services. DISTRIBUTION In our Corporates & Markets division, we rely on relationship managers and sales teams working together with product specialists to develop in-depth corporate finance expertise in both investment banking and commercial banking to meet the capital markets needs of our clients. Our goal is to offer a full range of capital markets products and services to our Corporates & Markets clients worldwide. Our customers now have a choice of three complementary distribution channels: standard "face-to-face" support by professional advisory staff, the Internet, and our service centers. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net Revenue. Net revenue in our Corporates & Markets division was E3,598 million in 2002, reflecting mainly decreased net interest earned and decreased fee and commission income, particularly in our mergers and acquisitions and other advisory business. Trading income from interest products was flat, reflecting a shift into interest products as a result of the poor performance of many equity indices. Net Income. Net income in our Corporates & Markets division was a loss of E1,642 million in 2002. Net income for our Corporates & Markets business declined primarily as a result of decreased net interest earned and fee and commission income, in conjunction with significant increases in net loan loss provisions and writedowns on private equity investments as a result of deteriorating economic conditions. Although we were able to reduce administrative expenses significantly as a result of cost-cutting and restructuring measures, the reduction in costs was not sufficient to offset the decline in income. 96 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net Revenue. Net revenue in our Corporates & Markets division was E1,725 million in 2001, reflecting mainly decreased fee and commission income, particularly in our mergers and acquisitions and other advisory business, and decreased trading income, particularly from equity securities, due to the weak capital markets. These declines were offset in part by increased interest income and trading income from fixed-income securities, reflecting a shift into fixed- income securities as a result of the poor performance of many equity indices. Net Income. Net income in our Corporates & Markets division was a loss of E797 million in 2001. Net income for our Corporates & Markets business declined primarily as a result of decreased fee and commission and trading income, in conjunction with increases in net loan loss provisions and writedowns on private equity investments as a result of deteriorating economic conditions, as well as high personnel and other administrative expenses. OTHER DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Our banking segment's Other division contains income and expense items that are not directly assigned to our operating divisions, as well as our transaction banking and, until August 2002, real estate business lines. Income and expense items that are not directly assigned to our operating divisions include, in particular, expenses for banking segment functions and projects affecting more than one division, realized gains and losses from our strategic investment portfolio and provisioning requirements for country and general risks. In addition, other items contains charges for the restructuring measures that have been introduced. See "-- Cost-Cutting and Restructuring Measures." In 2002, our banking segment's Other division accounted for approximately 25.6% of our net revenue from banking operations. Real Estate. Until August 2002, we served our real estate customers through our real estate business line, which comprised primarily the business operations of our mortgage bank Deutsche Hyp and our German real estate fund management subsidiary, DEGI Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Immobilienfonds GmbH (or DEGI). On August 1, 2002, we merged Deutsche Hyp with Rheinische Hypothekenbank AG, the mortgage banking subsidiary of Commerzbank, and Eurohypo AG, the mortgage banking subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, into a single entity, which retained the name Eurohypo. We deconsolidated Deutsche Hyp, which had assets of E79,134 million and liabilities of E76,784 million as of the date of the deconsolidation, on August 1, 2002. We hold an ownership interest of approximately 28% in Eurohypo, while Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank hold approximately 38% and 32% respectively, with the remainder publicly traded. We expect Eurohypo to develop over the next several years into a strong competitor in the European commercial mortgage banking market by achieving economies of scale and offering a broader product portfolio. Eurohypo retained the existing residential and other private mortgage banking business of Deutsche Hyp at the time of the merger, while our new residential and other private mortgage banking operations were transferred to Allianz Leben. As of August 1, 2002, the real estate business line in our Other division was dissolved. Our German real estate fund management subsidiary DEGI remained in our banking segment's Other division. Transaction Banking. As a corporate service unit in Germany, our transaction banking business line primarily provides our Private and Business Clients and Corporates & Markets divisions, as well as ADAM and other Allianz Group companies, with a wide variety of products and services relating to the processing of securities business and payments transactions. Through our custody business, we offer a comprehensive range of custody products and 97 services to national and international financial intermediaries. As of December 31, 2002, the total market value of securities under custody in Dresdner Bank was E415 billion. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net Revenue. Net revenue in our Other division was E2,349 million in 2002, reflecting primarily realized gains of E1,912 million on the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM, E1,265 million on intercompany transfers of equity securities and E244 million on the merger in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp into Eurohypo, offset in part primarily by realized losses on investment securities (E1,096 million), writedowns of investment securities (E1,129 million) and the negative effect on income attributable to the deconsolidation in August 2002 of Deutsche Hyp. Net Income. Net income in our Other division was E1,775 million in 2002. Net income was positively affected by realized gains, offset primarily by writedowns on investment securities and realized losses on investment securities. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net Revenue. Net revenue in our Other division was E804 million in 2001, reflecting primarily realized gains of E866 million from the sale of shares of Munich Re held by Dresdner Bank, other investment income of E628 million from realized gains on our strategic investment portfolio, changes in the fair value of non-qualifying hedge derivatives and interest income from our mortgage lending operations, offset in part by other expense from investments of E465 million consisting of realized losses and writedowns of investments. Net Income. Net income in our Other division was E1,260 million in 2001. Net income was positively affected by the disposition of Munich Re shares and other investment income, offset primarily by realized losses on investments of E340 million, restructuring charges of E23 million and charges of E146 million relating to the integration of Dresdner Bank into the Allianz Group. ASSET MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS ASSET MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS Our asset management segment operates as a global provider of institutional and retail asset management products and services to third-party investors and provides investment management services to our insurance operations. We managed approximately E989 billion of third-party assets and Group's own investments on a worldwide basis as of December 31, 2002, with key management centers in Munich, Frankfurt, London, Paris, Singapore, Hong Kong, Milan, Westport, Connecticut, and San Francisco, San Diego and Newport Beach, California. Our third-party assets under management have grown significantly in recent years, with the exception of 2002, and were approximately E561 billion as of December 31, 2002. As measured by total assets under management at December 31, 2002, we were one of the five leading asset managers in the world. 98 The following table sets forth certain key data concerning our asset management operations at December 31 for the years indicated: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT: KEY DATA DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001(1) 2000 --------------- ----------------- --------------- E % E % E % (E IN MILLIONS) Third-party assets(2)............... 560,588 56.7 620,458 55.1 336,424 48.0 Group's own investments(3).......... 403,061 40.7 480,876 42.7 341,283 48.7 Separate account assets(2)(4)....... 25,657 2.6 24,692 2.2 22,770 3.3 ------- ----- --------- ----- ------- ----- Total............................... 989,306 100.0 1,126,026 100.0 700,477 100.0 ======= ===== ========= ===== ======= ===== --------------- (1) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. (2) Assets are presented at fair value. (3) Includes trading liabilities and adjustments to reflect real estate and investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises at market value, and excludes certain loans to banks and loans to customers. Amounts in 2001 have been revised to facilitate comparison with the presentation of Group's own investments in 2002. (4) Represents investments held on account and at risk of life insurance policyholders. Our asset management operations pursue two separate but related objectives. In our third-party asset management business, we seek to leverage the power of our portfolio management expertise, existing customer relationships and distribution to maintain and further develop our position as a leading global asset manager. In the management of our Group's own investments, we seek to maximize long-term total return on our investments for the benefit of our shareholders and policyholders, including the value of our portfolio of financial and industrial equity participations, while remaining within the Group's risk management guidelines. We manage our third-party asset management business primarily through ADAM, our wholly owned asset management subsidiary formed after our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001. We reorganized our former financial services segment in late 2001 under ADAM in order to integrate the asset management operations of Dresdner Bank, to achieve new economies of scale and to extend the reach of our distribution networks for asset management products and services. We consolidated the assets and liabilities and results of operations of Dresdner Bank's asset management business into our asset management segment as of July 23, 2001, the date of the acquisition. In August 2002, we transferred substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. Debt outstanding as a result of this transfer was repaid in full as of July 2003. The banking operations formerly included in our financial services segment are now a part of our banking segment. See "-- Banking Operations." As of December 31, 2002, ADAM managed approximately E513 billion, or 91%, of our third-party assets under management and approximately E194 billion, or 48%, of our Group's own investments. The remainder of our third-party assets are managed by Dresdner Bank (approximately E24 billion, or 4%) and other Allianz Group companies. The majority of our Group's own investments (approximately E209 billion, or 52%) continue to be managed by the respective investment management units of Allianz Group insurance companies around the world. We conduct our third party asset management business primarily through our operating companies worldwide under the umbrella brand ADAM. As part of our multi-regional strategy, however, we operate under multiple brand names in different regions. In the United States, our main operating companies include PIMCO, Nicholas-Applegate, Dresdner RCM Global Investors, 99 and Oppenheimer Capital. In Europe, we operate primarily through AGF Asset Management, RAS Asset Management, Deutscher Investment Trust (or dit) and Dresdner Bank Investment Management (or dbi), as well as Dresdner RCM Global Investors and PIMCO. In Asia, after rebranding in 2002, our main brands are Allianz Dresdner Asset Management, PIMCO and Meiji Dresdner Asset Management. In October 2002, together with Guotai Junan Securities (or GTJA), we established Guotai Junan Allianz Fund Management Co., a Shanghai-based joint venture that was the first joint venture fund management company and the first licensed fund manager with foreign participation in China. Through the combination of GTJA's distribution network and our international asset management expertise, we believe our joint venture is well positioned to make successful inroads into this growth market. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information for our asset management operations for the years indicated: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------- 2002 2001(1) 2000 ------ ------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Interest and similar income................................. 119 129 204 Income from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises.................................... (12) (3) 1 Other income from investments............................... 35 44 18 Trading income.............................................. (1) 10 16 Fee and commission income, and income from service activities................................................ 2,918 2,479 1,420 Other income................................................ 126 79 63 ------ ------ ------ Total income.............................................. 3,185 2,738 1,722 ------ ------ ------ Interest and similar expenses............................... (89) (82) (61) Other expenses for investments.............................. (22) (57) -- Net loan loss provision..................................... (2) -- -- Acquisition costs and administrative expenses............... (2,378) (1,895) (484) Amortization of goodwill.................................... (377) (243) (89) Other expenses.............................................. (551) (795) (1,043) ------ ------ ------ Total expenses.............................................. (3,419) (3,072) (1,677) ------ ------ ------ Earnings from ordinary activities before taxation........... (234) (334) 45 Taxes....................................................... 59 168 4 Minority interests in earnings.............................. (230) (182) (136) ------ ------ ------ Net income.................................................. (405) (348) (87) ====== ====== ====== --------------- (1) Reflects the inclusion of Dresdner Bank in our consolidated financial statements as of July 23, 2001. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Assets Under Management. Third-party assets under management, Group's own investments and separate account assets decreased by E137 billion, or 12.2%, to E989 billion at the end of 2002 from E1,126 billion at the end of 2001. The decrease was due primarily to exchange rate movements (E77 billion with respect to third-party assets), particularly a decline in the U.S. dollar, and substantial price declines in the capital markets (E25 billion with respect to third- 100 party assets), offset in part by significant net capital inflows of approximately E56 billion into fixed-income funds. Of the decrease, E78 billion represented a decrease in Group's own investments, while E59 billion represented a decrease in third-party assets under management. Excluding the effects of exchange rate movements, our third-party assets under management would have increased by E18 billion, or 2.9%, to E638 billion at the end of 2002 due primarily to net inflows of E43 billion, primarily into fixed-income funds. Net Income. Asset management net income decreased by E57 million, to a net loss of E405 million in 2002 from a net loss of E348 million in 2001, due primarily to increased amortization of goodwill reflecting the acquisition and full-year consolidation in 2002 of Dresdner Bank, as well as minority interest in earnings related to the PIMCO Group. Total income, which consists primarily of fee and commission income, and income from service activities, increased by E447 million, or 16.3%, to E3,185 million in 2002 from E2,738 million in 2001, reflecting primarily the full-year consolidation in 2002 of Dresdner Bank's former asset management operations, offset in part by the lower average assets under management due to the effects of exchange rate movements and price declines in the capital markets. Total expenses increased by E347 million or 11.3%, to E3,419 million in 2002 from E3,072 million in 2001, due primarily to the full-year consolidation in 2002 of Dresdner Bank's former asset management operations, offset in part by restructuring measures implemented in the course of 2002 at virtually all of our equity investment operations to increase operational efficiency by reducing personnel and streamlining back-office operations and product lines. Total expenses included acquisition-related expenses of E729 million recorded in 2002. The acquisition-related expenses consisted primarily of amortization of goodwill of E377 million associated with the acquisitions of Dresdner Bank, PIMCO and Nicholas-Applegate and amortization charges of E155 million relating to capitalized retention payments to key executives of the PIMCO Group, which are being amortized over periods of five to seven years from the date of the acquisition. Another E197 million were retention payments for the management and employees of PIMCO and Nicholas-Applegate. In addition, minority interest of E230 million in our asset management operations was accounted for mainly by the minority interest in PIMCO (E162 million) of PIMCO's former parent company, which continues to hold a minority ownership interest in PIMCO. Our ownership interest in PIMCO was recently restructured. Pursuant to such restructuring, neither Allianz nor PIMCO's former parent company can put or call the entire ownership interest of PIMCO's former parent company in PIMCO with effect prior to October 2004, although either party may put or call up to US$250 million of such ownership interest in any calendar quarter, beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2003. On March 31, 2003, a subsidiary of Allianz AG received notice from the former parent company of PIMCO that such former parent company had exercised its right to put US$250 million of its remaining ownership interest in PIMCO to Allianz, with payment therefor due by April 30, 2003. Such payment was made on April 14, 2003. Excluding the effects of the acquisition-related expenses of E729 million, earnings from ordinary activities before taxation from our asset management operations would have been E495 million in 2002. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Assets Under Management. Third-party assets under management, Group's own investments and separate account assets increased by E426 billion, or 60.8%, to E1,126 billion at the end of 2001 from E700 billion at the end of 2000. The increase was due primarily to our acquisitions of Dresdner Bank and Nicholas-Applegate, and to a lesser extent, an increase in the Group's own investments and third-party assets under management. Of the increase, E140 billion represented growth in Group's own investments, while E284 billion represented growth in third-party assets under management, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Dresdner Bank (E211 billion), as well as the acquisition of Nicholas-Applegate (E29 billion). Excluding the effects of these acquisitions, as well as the effects of exchange rate movements (E16 billion), 101 our third-party assets under management would have increased by E28 billion, or 8.3%, to E364 billion at the end of 2001 due primarily to growth in fixed-income investments in our PIMCO operations. Net Income. Asset management net income decreased by E261 million, to a net loss of E348 million in 2001 from a net loss of E87 million in 2000, despite the increase in assets under management, primarily because costs rose more quickly than income. Total income, which consists primarily of fee and commission income, and income from service activities, increased by E1,016 million, or 59.0% to E2,738 million in 2001 from E1,722 million in 2000, reflecting primarily the increased assets under management due to our acquisition of Dresdner Bank. Total expenses increased by E1,395 million or 83.2%, to E3,072 million in 2001 from E1,677 million in 2000, due primarily to increased expenses associated with our acquisition of Dresdner Bank. Total expenses included acquisition-related expenses of E647 million recorded in 2001, as well as costs incurred in connection with the establishment of ADAM and the reorganization of our asset management operations as a result of our acquisition of Dresdner Bank. The acquisition-related expenses included amortization of goodwill of E243 million associated with the acquisitions of PIMCO and Nicholas-Applegate, amortization charges of E374 million relating to capitalized retention payments to key executives of the PIMCO Group, which are being amortized over periods of five to seven years from the date of the acquisition, and an additional E30 million of expenses incurred in connection with retention payments to key executives at Dresdner RCM following our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001. In addition, minority interest of E182 million in our asset management operations was accounted for mainly by the minority interest in PIMCO (E142 million) of PIMCO's former parent company, which continues to hold an approximately 30% ownership interest in PIMCO. Excluding the effects of the acquisition-related expenses of E647 million, earnings from ordinary activities before taxation from our asset management operations would have been E313 million in 2001, due primarily to earnings at PIMCO. THIRD-PARTY ASSETS The following table sets forth certain key data concerning our third-party assets under management at December 31 for the years indicated: ASSET MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS -- KEY DATA BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION(1) DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------- ----------- ----------- E % E % E % --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- (E IN BILLIONS) ADAM Germany........................................ 80 14.3 96 15.5 8 2.4 Rest of Europe................................. 37 6.6 53 8.5 22 6.5 NAFTA.......................................... 388 69.1 409 66.0 297 88.4 Rest of World.................................. 8 1.4 26 4.2 -- -- --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- Subtotal.................................... 513 91.4 584 94.2 327 97.3 Other(2)......................................... 48 8.6 36 5.8 9 2.7 --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- Total....................................... 561 100.0 620 100.0 336 100.0 === ===== === ===== === ===== --------------- (1) Represents location of Allianz Group asset management operations. (2) Consists of assets managed by Dresdner Bank (E24 billion and E27 billion in 2002 and 2001, respectively) and other Allianz Group companies (E24 billion and E9 billion in 2002 and 2001, respectively). The increase from 2001 to 2002 reflects a reclassification of certain companies from ADAM in 2001 to other Allianz Group companies in 2002. 102 We have significantly grown our third-party assets under management in recent years, both through acquisitions such as Dresdner Bank and Nicholas-Applegate in 2001 and PIMCO in 2000, and through organic growth. We intend to leverage the PIMCO, dit, Nicholas-Applegate and Dresdner RCM franchises in further developing our third-party asset management business through our flagship subsidiaries on a global basis. We believe that the European markets offer especially attractive opportunities for third-party fund managers. We also expect that investment fund products, in particular retirement planning vehicles, will increase in importance in Europe. We expect this trend to be supported by the increased demographic pressure that state-run pension systems will face and the rising prevalence of defined contribution arrangements. We believe that we are well positioned in third-party markets, especially in Germany, France and Italy, and we are seeking to increase our market share in these markets. We are also developing our insurance and banking distribution capabilities, including our dedicated advisory, branch bank and insurance networks in Europe, as asset accumulation arms to further our asset management capabilities. Leading examples of our activities in this area include our operations through Dresdner Bank, where we have approximately 7,000 financial advisors in branch offices to distribute our asset management, life insurance and other financial products; our operations at RAS Group, with its independent network of licensed financial advisors who distribute life insurance and financial products; and our operations at the AGF Group in France, with its network of advisors offering comprehensive financial planning services. See also "-- Banking Operations." As a result of the reorganization of our asset management operations under ADAM, we believe we are well positioned to deliver quality products and services in all major asset classes for both retail and institutional clients. We aim to provide our clients with first-class products on a global basis by fully utilizing our distribution channels and leveraging the asset management expertise of our specialized asset managers around the world. We serve a comprehensive range of retail and institutional asset management clients, including corporate and public pension funds, insurance and other financial services companies, governments and charities, financial advisors and private individuals. Our third-party asset management includes primarily equity, fixed income, money market and sector products, as well as alternative investments. The following tables show our third-party assets under management by investment category and by investor class at December 31 for the years indicated: DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------- ----------- ----------- E % E % E % --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- (E IN BILLIONS) Fixed income..................................... 405 72.2 377 60.8 240 71.3 Equity........................................... 141 25.1 218 35.2 96 28.7 Other(1)......................................... 15 2.7 25 4.0 -- -- --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- Total.......................................... 561 100.0 620 100.0 336 100.0 === ===== === ===== === ===== --------------- (1) Includes primarily investments in real estate. DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------- ----------- ----------- E % E % E % --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- (E IN BILLIONS) Institutional.................................... 403 71.8 466 75.2 269 80.1 Retail........................................... 158 28.2 154 24.8 67 19.9 --- ----- --- ----- --- ----- Total.......................................... 561 100.0 620 100.0 336 100.0 === ===== === ===== === ===== 103 Our third-party asset management subsidiary ADAM is organized globally into three principal business lines: global equity, global fixed-income and global retail (distribution). Each of our asset management business lines is led by a global head. Together with ADAM's chief executive officer and chief operating officer, who sets standards and coordinates corporate controlling and administration, each of the global heads is also a member of ADAM's executive committee, which is responsible for ADAM's strategic development and financial performance. In addition, country organizations led by country managers provide shared infrastructure and services. ADAM's management structure has been designed to manage the complexity of its multi-regional, multi-product and multi-channel business activities. Within this structure, ADAM maintains significant incentives for entrepreneurship and encourages its business units to operate autonomously. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT ADAM has globally consistent, well-structured and transparent investment processes that are based on fundamental primary research. ADAM's goal is to provide its clients with portfolios that consistently offer superior performance in accordance with its clients' investment objectives. ADAM aims for outperformance through active portfolio management coupled with comprehensive risk management at all levels of the investment process. At December 31, 2002, we had more than 560 portfolio managers and more than 200 analysts in major markets worldwide providing a comprehensive range of actively managed fixed-income and equity products and services. Global Fixed Income ADAM's fixed-income portfolio investment process is led by PIMCO, one of the world's leading fixed-income investment managers. Our fixed-income product range includes total return, short and long duration, regional, country-specific, global and other geographic products, sector products including government and corporate bonds and specialty funds such as high yield and emerging markets. We deliver our fixed-income products in a broad range of investment vehicles, including separate accounts, fixed-income mutual funds and investment trusts. Global Equity Our equity portfolio investment products include all major investment styles: value investment, growth investment and core investment. Our equity product range comprises regional, country-specific, global and other geographic products, sector products such as technology, biotechnology, capital equipment, consumer goods, energy and materials, and finance, as well as large, medium and small market capitalization funds. We deliver our equity products in a broad range of investment vehicles. DISTRIBUTION In Europe, ADAM markets and services institutional products offered by its asset management subsidiaries through specialized personnel located primarily in its Frankfurt, London, Munich, Paris and Milan offices. European retail distribution is provided primarily through the proprietary channels of the Allianz Group, including branch bank advisors, full-time agents employed by affiliated insurance companies and other Allianz Group financial planners and advisors. In Germany, ADAM and its predecessors have offered mutual funds since 1949. The funds are distributed primarily through our branch bank network and our full-time insurance agents. To strengthen these channels, ADAM provides asset management specialists and support services, including call centers and client services. 104 In France, AGF Asset Management markets a wide range of retail products to individual investors through its own in-house network of financial advisors, including full-time agents employed by AGF Group, brokers and specialist networks. In Italy, RAS Asset Management offers mutual funds, private banking products, current accounts, credit and debit cards, brokerage services and real estate financing. Retail products and services are marketed through affiliated financial planners, financial advisors, banks and via the Internet. In the United Kingdom and the United States, each of our ADAM asset managers markets and services its institutional products through its own specialized personnel. The institutional markets in the United Kingdom and the United States are dominated by consultants, who advise their clients with regard to investment strategy and asset allocation, conduct due diligence on and rank portfolio managers, and conduct searches. As a result, ADAM portfolio managers in these areas put emphasis on servicing consultants. In addition, in the United States, ADAM asset managers offer a wide range of retail products. The principal proprietary channel is PIMCO Funds, which distributes mutual funds managed by its affiliates through broker-dealers, financial planners, 401(k) funds and other intermediaries. We also provide "wrap" services through broker-dealers, by managing all or a part of separate accounts maintained by broker-dealers for their customers. In the United States, ADAM also advises mutual funds sponsored by third parties, including other mutual fund families and insurance companies offering variable annuity products. ADAM has committed substantial resources to the build-out of a third-party asset management business in Asia-Pacific. We have offices in Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taipei, Seoul and Sydney, which are being enlarged to accommodate equity and fixed-income portfolio management as well as institutional and retail distribution. In November 2002, we rebranded our fund management operations across Asia-Pacific under the umbrella brand ADAM. ADAM is also seeking to leverage its brand, investment know-how and customer relationships in China and to exploit the opportunities in this growing asset management market. COMPETITION Our main competitors in the asset management business include Deutsche Bank, AXA, UBS, Credit Suisse, Fidelity Investments, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Capital Group and Amvescap. Each of these entities has large, multi-jurisdictional and multi-product asset management operations, and most of them compete with us for both retail and institutional clients. GROUP'S OWN INVESTMENTS Our Group's own investments consist of the investment portfolios of our insurance, banking and asset management operations. Our investment strategy with regard to our Group's own investments is to maximize long-term total return while remaining within the Group's risk management guidelines. These guidelines relate primarily to the quality of the investments and the matching of assets and liabilities. Our policy is to closely match the maturities and currencies of assets and liabilities. The investment policies of the insurance subsidiaries reflect the different liability characteristics and tax profiles of their respective operations. Our internationally integrated teams of portfolio managers work closely with the regional asset management subsidiaries to coordinate asset/liability management and product development activities. Because our insurance investments mostly serve to cover liabilities in the insurance business, our asset management professionals place a high priority on high quality, liquid and widely marketable securities in our insurance investments portfolio. For a discussion of the investment portfolios of our banking operations, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations." For further discussion regarding our Group's investment strategy and risk management practices, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk." 105 The following tables set forth the components of our Group's own investment portfolios by investment category, as well as separate account assets, at the end of the years indicated. Consistent with our general practice, amounts by investment category are presented before consolidation adjustments representing the elimination of transactions between Group companies in different segments. DECEMBER 31, 2002(1) -------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ ASSET CONSOLIDATION CASUALTY HEALTH BANKING MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL --------- ------- ------- ---------- ------------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises............ 51,448 6,183 4,349 20 (50,655) 11,345 Investments.............. 76,855 189,172 28,965 993 (10,645) 285,340 Loans and advances to banks.................. 5,219 3,490 76,748 1,863 (498) 86,822 Loans and advances to customers.............. 2,882 24,747 168,919 228 (8,692) 188,084 Trading assets........... 1,404 1,177 122,139 156 (34) 124,842 ------- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------- Subtotal............... 137,808 224,769 401,120 3,260 (70,524) 696,433 Separate accounts........ -- 25,657 -- -- -- 25,657 ------- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------- Total.................. 137,808 250,426 401,120 3,260 (70,524) 722,090 ======= ======= ======= ===== ======= ======= --------------- (1) Group's own investments are stated at balance sheet value. DECEMBER 31, 2001(1) -------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ ASSET CONSOLIDATION CASUALTY HEALTH BANKING MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL --------- ------- ------- ---------- ------------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises............ 40,387 6,043 2,079 116 (38,378) 10,247 Investments.............. 91,712 180,076 85,133 1,362 (12,981) 345,302 Loans and advances to banks.................. 5,079 1,010 54,271 1,646 (732) 61,274 Loans and advances to customers.............. 2,837 24,843 222,916 561 (11,464) 239,693 Trading assets........... 1,373 775 125,741 539 (6) 128,422 ------- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------- Subtotal............... 141,388 212,747 490,140 4,224 (63,561) 784,938 Separate accounts........ -- 24,692 -- -- -- 24,692 ------- ------- ------- ----- ------- ------- Total.................. 141,388 237,439 490,140 4,224 (63,561) 809,630 ======= ======= ======= ===== ======= ======= --------------- (1) Group's own investments are stated at balance sheet value. 106 DECEMBER 31, 2000(1) -------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ ASSET CONSOLIDATION CASUALTY HEALTH BANKING MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL --------- ------- ------- ---------- ------------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises............. 22,514 5,615 96 62 (16,524) 11,763 Investments............... 95,718 186,799 3,070 528 (5,281) 280,834 Loans and advances to banks................... 4,527 3,747 1,142 1,102 (3,448) 7,070 Loans and advances to customers............... 1,565 14,445 12,555 395 (874) 28,086 Trading assets............ 20 119 51 182 -- 372 ------- ------- ------ ----- ------- ------- Subtotal................ 124,344 210,725 16,914 2,269 (26,127) 328,125 Separate accounts assets.. -- 22,770 -- -- -- 22,770 ------- ------- ------ ----- ------- ------- Total................... 124,344 233,495 16,914 2,269 (26,127) 350,895 ======= ======= ====== ===== ======= ======= --------------- (1) Group's own investments are stated at balance sheet value. INSURANCE OPERATIONS INVESTMENTS The following is a discussion of the investment portfolio of our insurance operations. For a discussion of the investment portfolios of our banking operations, see "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations." INTEREST-BEARING INVESTMENTS Fixed income securities, including both government and corporate bonds, constituted 54.8% of our property-casualty investment portfolio and 74.5% of our life/health investment portfolio as of December 31, 2002. The credit quality of our fixed income securities portfolio has historically been strong. As of December 31, 2002, of the rated fixed income securities in our Group's own investments portfolio, approximately 34% had a rating comparable to a Standard & Poor's rating of AAA, approximately 63% were invested in securities with a Standard & Poor's rating of AA or better and approximately 95% were invested in securities with a Standard & Poor's rating of BBB or better. The following table analyzes the maturities of our fixed income investments available for sale at December 31, 2002: AMORTIZED COST MARKET VALUE -------------- ------------ (E IN MILLIONS) Contractual term to maturity: Up to one year............................................ 18,459 21,091 Over one year through five years.......................... 86,646 79,500 Over five years through ten years......................... 70,109 90,113 Over ten years............................................ 31,377 27,122 ------- ------- Total.................................................. 206,591 217,826 ======= ======= EQUITY INVESTMENTS Equity investments constituted 27.9% of our property-casualty investment portfolio and 12.7% of our life/health investment portfolio as of December 31, 2002. We have a long-standing 107 strategy of investing life policyholders' and shareholders' funds and some amounts of property-casualty cash flow in equities. Since the early 1900's, the life/health and property-casualty investments in Germany have included equity positions in a number of well-known German companies (see table below). In view of weak capital markets in 2002, we have reduced our equity exposure through various divestments and hedging activities. However, we believe that shares continue to represent an attractive long-term investment option and will deliver additional value to a well-diversified investment portfolio long-term. The following table sets forth our Group's own investment portfolios by geographic region at the end of the years indicated: DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ PROPERTY- LIFE/ PROPERTY- LIFE/ CASUALTY HEALTH CASUALTY HEALTH CASUALTY HEALTH --------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Germany........................ 101,802 119,870 100,600 117,233 79,398 121,100 Rest of Europe................. 64,634 103,270 59,139 97,547 56,164 93,400 NAFTA.......................... 19,522 22,038 20,398 18,438 17,945 15,604 Rest of World.................. 2,855 5,291 2,514 4,491 1,820 3,607 Specialty Lines................ 4,417 -- 3,007 -- 3,057 -- Consolidated Adjustments....... (55,422) (43) (44,270) (270) (34,040) (216) ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total........................ 137,808 250,426 141,388 237,439 124,344 233,495 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= SIGNIFICANT GROUP EQUITY INVESTMENTS The following tables set forth information regarding our significant equity investments in German and non-German companies at December 31, 2002. Except for the investments in Munich Re, Beiersdorf AG and Eurohypo, which are valued by the equity method because we hold more than a 20% interest, these investments are carried on our financial statements at market value. DECEMBER 31, 2002 --------------------------------------------- CARRYING VALUE MARKET VALUE % OWNERSHIP -------------- ------------ ----------- (E IN MILLIONS) Munich Re(1)....................................... 3,045 4,548 22.4 Beiersdorf AG(2)................................... 1,620 3,886 43.6 Eurohypo........................................... 1,933 1,984 28.7 --------------- (1) Our interest in Munich Re was substantially restructured pursuant to our acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001 and our related agreements with Munich Re. In addition, we reduced our interest in Munich Re to less than 20% on March 31, 2003 and further intend to reduce our interest in Munich Re to approximately 15% by the end of 2004. As of June 30, 2003, our interest in Munich Re was approximately 18.9%. See "Related Party Transactions -- Transactions with Munich Re." (2) Includes 13.1% sold pursuant to repurchase agreements. 108 DECEMBER 31, 2002 -------------------------- MARKET VALUE % OWNERSHIP ------------ ----------- (E IN MILLIONS) GERMAN COMPANIES E.ON AG................................................... 1,695 6.4 BASF AG................................................... 1,269 6.1 Siemens AG................................................ 1,053 2.9 Bayerische Motorenwerke AG................................ 995 5.2 Schering AG............................................... 978 12.0 RWE AG.................................................... 931 6.9 Deutsche Bank AG.......................................... 824 3.1 Bayer AG.................................................. 872 5.8 Linde AG.................................................. 526 12.6 NON-GERMAN COMPANIES Credit Lyonnais S.A....................................... 1,915 10.3 UniCredito Italiano S.p.A................................. 1,181 4.9 Banco Popular Espanol S.A................................. 842 9.9 Total Fina Elf S.A........................................ 767 1.3 Nestle S.A................................................ 546 0.7 Royal Dutch Petroleum..................................... 519 0.5 INVESTMENT INCOME The following tables set forth the components of our investment income and expenses for each of the property-casualty, life/health, banking and asset management segments for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ ASSET CONSOLIDATION CASUALTY HEALTH BANKING MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL --------- ------ ------- ---------- ------------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) INVESTMENT INCOME Interest and similar income..... 4,473 11,215 13,336 119 (933) 28,210 Income from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises.... 8,494 445 2,071 (12) (6,600) 4,398 Realized gains.................. 3,358 4,571 1,389 30 (694) 8,654 Income from revaluations........ 294 361 41 5 -- 701 Trading income.................. 207 244 1,081 (1) (24) 1,507 ------ ------ ------- ---- ------ ------- Subtotal...................... 16,826 16,836 17,918 141 (8,251) 43,470 INVESTMENT EXPENSES Interest and similar expenses... (1,564) (434) (9,509) (89) 945 (10,651) Realized losses................. (1,536) (5,930) (1,096) (11) 368 (8,205) Loan loss allowance............. (7) (10) (2,222) (2) -- (2,241) Writedowns and other expenses... (2,031) (2,726) (1,129) (11) -- (5,897) Investment management expenses...................... (528) (650) -- -- 121 (1,057) ------ ------ ------- ---- ------ ------- Subtotal...................... (5,666) (9,750) (13,956) (113) 1,434 (28,051) ------ ------ ------- ---- ------ ------- INVESTMENT INCOME (NET)........... 11,160 7,086 3,962 28 (6,817) 15,419 ====== ====== ======= ==== ====== ======= 109 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ ASSET CONSOLIDATION CASUALTY HEALTH BANKING MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL --------- ------ ------- ---------- ------------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) INVESTMENT INCOME Interest and similar income..... 5,068 10,765 9,085 129 (823) 24,224 Income from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises.... 889 525 1,016 (3) (839) 1,588 Realized gains.................. 4,211 3,405 505 33 (39) 8,115 Income from revaluations........ 96 157 123 11 -- 387 Trading income.................. 1,451 (117) 244 10 4 1,592 ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- Subtotal...................... 11,715 14,735 10,973 180 (1,697) 35,906 INVESTMENT EXPENSES Interest and similar expenses... (1,323) (492) (6,766) (82) 802 (7,861) Realized losses................. (2,088) (4,542) (341) (51) 24 (6,998) Loan loss allowance............. (4) (4) (588) -- -- (596) Writedowns and other expenses... (800) (995) (124) (6) -- (1,925) Investment management expenses...................... (499) (546) -- -- 104 (941) ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- Subtotal...................... (4,714) (6,579) (7,819) (139) 930 (18,321) ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- INVESTMENT INCOME (NET)........... 7,001 8,156 3,154 41 (767) 17,585 ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ======= YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- LIFE/ ASSET CONSOLIDATION CASUALTY HEALTH BANKING MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL --------- ------ ------- ---------- ------------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) INVESTMENT INCOME Interest and similar income..... 5,568 10,152 1,502 204 (831) 16,595 Income from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises.... 1,833 693 122 1 (789) 1,860 Realized gains.................. 4,250 6,639 24 18 (24) 10,907 Income from revaluations........ 9 28 1 -- -- 38 Trading income.................. (10) (49) 7 16 -- (36) ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- Subtotal...................... 11,650 17,463 1,656 239 (1,644) 29,364 INVESTMENT EXPENSES Interest and similar expenses... (1,136) (148) (1,257) (61) 203 (2,399) Realized losses................. (1,428) (2,624) (28) -- 1 (4,079) Loan loss allowance............. -- -- (21) -- -- (21) Writedowns and other expenses... (485) (380) (5) -- -- (870) Investment management expenses...................... (558) (406) -- -- 8 (956) ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- Subtotal...................... (3,607) (3,558) (1,311) (61) 212 (8,325) ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- INVESTMENT INCOME (NET)........... 8,043 13,905 345 178 (1,432) 21,039 ====== ====== ====== ==== ====== ======= YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net investment income decreased by E2,166 million, or 12.3%, to E15,419 million in 2002 from E17,585 million in 2001, largely as a result of weakness in the capital markets in 2002, as 110 reflected in the increase in realized losses, which increased by E1,207 million, or 17.2%, in 2002 compared to 2001 and increased writedowns and other expenses of E5,897 million in 2002, compared to E1,925 million in 2001. Property-casualty insurance investments decreased by E3,580 million, or 2.5%, to E137,808 million in 2002 from E141,388 million in 2001, due primarily to a decrease in securities available for sale, largely offset by an increase in investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associate enterprises. Net investment income from property-casualty investments increased by E4,159 million, or 59.4%, to E11,160 million in 2002 from E7,001 million in 2001, due primarily to realized gains of E1,886 million from open market sales of Munich Re shares, approximately E1,100 million from open market sales of Vodafone AG shares and E713 million on the sale of a real estate subsidiary in Italy as well as realized gains from the sale of other shareholdings in our German equity portfolio. Net investment income from property-casualty investments also included significant investment income from intercompany transactions, including realized gains of E3,332 million from the transfer of Munich Re shares from Allianz AG to Dresdner Bank and E224 million from the sale of Vereinte Lebensversicherung AG from Vereinte Versicherung AG to Allianz Leben. The gain on this intercompany transaction was eliminated at the Group level. Net investment income from property-casualty insurance investments was negatively affected by price declines on the capital markets. Writedowns on investments increased by E1,231 million, or 153.9%,in 2002 compared with 2001. Interest and similar income decreased 11.7% to E4,473 million in 2002, compared with E5,068 million in 2001, while realized gains decreased to E3,358 million in 2002, compared with E4,211 million in 2001. Investment expenses increased by E952 million, or 20.2%, to E5,666 million in 2002 from E4,714 million in 2001, reflecting primarily increased realized losses on investments and writedowns of investments as a result of price declines in the capital markets. Life/health insurance investments increased by E12,987 million, or 5.5%, to E250,426 million in 2002 from E237,439 million in 2001, reflecting primarily an increase in securities available for sale. Net investment income from life/health investments decreased by E1,070 million, or 13.1%, to E7,086 million in 2002 from E8,156 million in 2001, primarily due to an increase in investment writedowns, which increased by E1,731 million, or 174%, in 2002 compared with 2001 due to price declines in the capital markets. Interest and similar income increased 4.2%, to E11,215 million in 2002, compared with E10,765 million in 2001, while realized gains increased 34.2%, to E4,571 million in 2002, compared with E3,405 million in 2001. Investment expenses increased by E3,171 million, or 48.2%, to E9,750 million in 2002 from E6,579 million in 2001, reflecting primarily an increase in realized losses on investments and writedowns of investments due to price declines in the capital markets. Banking investments decreased by E89,020 million to E401,120 million in 2002 from E490,140 million in 2001, due primarily to a significant decrease in securities available for sale. Net investment income from banking investments increased by E808 million, to E3,962 million in 2002 from E3,154 million in 2001, due primarily to a realized gain of E1,912 million resulting from the transfer in August 2002 of substantially all of Dresdner Bank's German asset management subsidiaries to ADAM. The gain on this intercompany transaction was eliminated at the Group level. Net investment income from banking investments was negatively affected by price declines in the capital markets. Writedowns of investments increased significantly by E1,005 million, to E1,129 million in 2002, compared with E124 million in 2001. Interest and similar income increased to E13,336 million in 2002, compared with E9,085 million in 2001, while realized gains increased to E1,389 million in 2002, compared with E505 million in 2001. Investment expenses increased to E13,956 million in 2002 from E7,819 million in 2001. Asset management investments decreased by E964 million, or 22.8%, to E3,260 million in 2002 from E4,224 million in 2001, reflecting primarily decreases in trading assets and securities available for sale. Net investment income from asset management investments decreased by E13 million to E28 million in 2002 from E41 million in 2001. Interest and similar income decreased 111 by E10 million, or 7.8%, to E119 million in 2002, compared with E129 million in 2001, while realized gains decreased to E30 million in 2002 from E33 million in 2001. Investment expenses decreased by E26 million, or 18.7%, to E113 million in 2002 from E139 million in 2001. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Net investment income decreased by E3,454 million, or 16.4%, to E17,585 million in 2001 from E21,039 million in 2000, largely as a result of the downturn in the capital markets in 2001, as reflected in the decrease in realized gains, which decreased by E2,792 million, or 25.6%, and the increase in realized losses, which increased by E2,919 million, or 71.6%, in 2001 compared to 2000. Property-casualty insurance investments increased by E17,044 million, or 13.7%, to E141,388 million in 2001 from E124,344 million in 2000, due primarily to an increase in investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises. Net investment income from property-casualty investments decreased by E1,042 million, or 13.0%, to E7,001 million in 2001 from E8,043 million in 2000, due primarily to price declines on the capital markets. Interest and similar income decreased 9.0% to E5,068 million in 2001, compared with E5,568 million in 2000, while realized gains decreased slightly to E4,211 million in 2001, compared with E4,250 million in 2000. Investment expenses increased by E1,107 million, or 30.7%, to E4,714 million in 2001 from E3,607 million in 2000, reflecting primarily increased realized losses on investments and writedowns of investments as a result of price declines in the capital markets. Life/health insurance investments increased slightly by E3,944 million, or 1.7%, to E237,439 million in 2001 from E233,495 million in 2000, reflecting primarily an increase in separate account investments. Net investment income from life/health investments decreased by E5,749 million, or 41.3%, to E8,156 million in 2001 from E13,905 million in 2000, primarily due to a decrease in realized gains on investments and an increase in realized losses on investments due to price declines in the capital markets. Interest and similar income increased 6.0%, to E10,765 million in 2001, compared with E10,152 million in 2000, while realized gains decreased 48.7%, to E3,405 million in 2001, compared with E6,639 million in 2000. Investment expenses increased by E3,021 million, or 84.9%, to E6,579 million in 2001 from E3,558 million in 2000, reflecting primarily an increase in realized losses on investments and writedowns of investments due to price declines in the capital markets. Banking investments increased by E473,226 million to E490,140 million in 2001 from E16,914 million in 2000, due primarily to the acquisition of Dresdner Bank. The Dresdner Bank acquisition was also the primary driver of the banking segment's investment results, as our banking operations were not significant in 2000. Net investment income from banking investments increased by E2,809 million, to E3,154 million in 2001 from E345 million in 2000. Interest and similar income increased to E9,085 million in 2001, compared with E1,502 million in 2000, while realized gains increased to E505 million in 2001, compared with E24 million in 2000. Investment expenses increased to E7,819 million in 2001 from E1,311 million in 2000. Asset management investments increased by E1,955 million, or 86.2%, to E4,224 million in 2001 from E2,269 million in 2000, reflecting primarily the acquisition of Dresdner Bank, offset in part by price declines on the capital markets. Net investment income from asset management investments decreased by E137 million to E41 million in 2001 from E178 million in 2000. Interest and similar income decreased by E75 million, or 36.8%, to E129 million in 2001, compared with E204 million in 2000, while realized gains increased to E33 million in 2001 from E18 million in 2000. Investment expenses increased by E78 million, or 127.9%, to E139 million in 2001 from E61 million in 2000, reflecting primarily realized losses on investments due to price declines in the capital markets. 112 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES We operate as both a holding company for the Group's insurance, banking and other subsidiaries and as a reinsurance company, primarily for other Group companies. The liquidity and capital resource considerations for us and for our domestic and non-domestic operating subsidiaries vary in light of the business conducted by each, as well as the insurance and banking regulatory requirements applicable to the Allianz Group in Germany and the other countries in which it does business. At December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, Allianz Group had E21,008 million, E21,240 million and E4,209 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements. Our principal sources of funds are premiums, customer deposits, investment income, funds that may be raised from time to time from the issuance of debt or equity securities and bank or other borrowings, as well as cash dividends and reinsurance premiums received from our subsidiaries. For additional information, see Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements. See also "-- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations" and "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk." For further information regarding the uses and sources of liquidity, capital requirements, and other related matters, see "-- Consolidated Cash Flows." The majority of Allianz AG's external debt financing at December 31, 2002 was in the form of debentures and money market securities. Our total certificated liabilities outstanding at December 2002, 2001 and 2000 were E78,750 million, E134,670 million and E13,606 million, respectively. Of the certificated liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2002, E41,077 million were due within one year. For further information regarding outstanding certificated liabilities, see Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements. Proceeds to Allianz Finance B.V. and Allianz Finance II B.V. from the issuance of debt for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were approximately E5,400 million, E3,054 million and E2,354 million, respectively. We paid dividends of E374 million, E364 million, E367 million and E307 million on our shares in 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 with respect to the fiscal years 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. See "Key Information -- Dividends." Dividends paid by our operating companies outside of Germany are generally retained by an intermediate holding company to finance operations or acquisitions in the relevant countries. As a result, we generally pay dividends out of the profits from our reinsurance operations and profits transferred from our German operating subsidiaries. Certain of the companies within the Allianz Group are subject to legal restrictions on the amount of dividends they can pay to their shareholders. In addition to the restrictions in respect of minimum capital and solvency requirements that are imposed by insurance and other regulators in the countries in which these companies operate, other limitations exist in certain countries. For example, the operations of our insurance company subsidiaries located in the United States are subject to limitations on the payment of dividends to their parent company under applicable state insurance laws. Dividends paid in excess of these limitations generally require prior approval of the insurance commissioner of the state of domicile. See "-- Regulation and Supervision." CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS The liquidity requirements of our insurance operations are met both on a short- and long-term basis by funds provided by insurance premiums collected, investment income and collected reinsurance receivables, and from the sale and maturity of investments. We also have access to commercial paper, medium-term notes and other credit facilities as additional sources of liquidity. The major uses of these funds are to pay property-casualty claims and related claims expenses, 113 provide life policy benefits, pay surrenders, cancellations and profit sharing for life policyholders and pay other operating costs. We generate a substantial cash flow from insurance operations as a result of most premiums being received in advance of the time when claim payments or policy benefits are required. These positive operating cash flows, along with that portion of the investment portfolio that is held in cash and liquid securities, have historically met the liquidity requirements of our insurance operations. In the insurance industry, liquidity generally refers to the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash from its normal operations, including its investment portfolio, in order to meet its financial commitments, which are principally obligations under its insurance or reinsurance contracts. The liquidity of our property-casualty insurance operations is affected by the frequency and severity of losses under its policies, as well as by the persistency of its products. Future catastrophic events, the timing and effect of which are inherently unpredictable, may also create increased liquidity requirements for our property-casualty operations. The liquidity needs of our life operations are generally affected by trends in actual mortality experience relative to the assumptions with respect thereto included in the pricing of its life insurance policies, by the extent to which minimum returns or crediting rates are provided in connection with its life insurance products, as well as by the level of surrenders and withdrawals. With regard to our banking operations, our primary sources of liquidity are customer deposits and interest income from our lending transactions and our investment portfolio, while our major uses of funds are for the issuance of new loans and advances to banks and customers, and the payment of interest on deposits, certificated liabilities and subordinated liabilities and other operating costs. Other sources of liquidity include our ability to borrow on the interbank market and convert securities in our investment and trading portfolios into cash. Our uses of funds, in addition to the dividends paid to shareholders of Allianz AG include underwriting expenditures (reinsurance premiums, benefits, surrenders, claims -- including claims handling expenses -- and profit sharing by life policyholders), acquisitions, and employee and other operating expenses, as well as interest expense on outstanding borrowings. Our life and health insurance products include mandatory profit-sharing features, whereby we return a specified portion of statutory profits to policyholders annually, generally in the form of premium subsidies or rebates. See "-- Life/Health Insurance Operations -- Life/Health Operations by Geographic Region -- Germany -- Life Insurance" and "-- Life/Health Insurance Operations -- Life/Health Operations by Geographic Region -- Germany -- Health Insurance." Recent significant acquisitions have included the purchases of PIMCO in May 2000, Nicholas-Applegate in January 2001 and Dresdner Bank in July 2001. On March 31, 2003, a subsidiary of Allianz AG received notice from the former parent company of PIMCO that such former parent company had exercised its rights to put US$250 million of its remaining ownership interest in PIMCO to Allianz, with payment therefore due by April 30, 2003. Such payment was made on April 14, 2003. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information. Our capital requirements are primarily dependent on our business plans regarding the levels and timing of capital expenditures and investments. The following cash flow discussion reflects reclassifications in 2002 of cash flows in 2001 and 2000 relating to aggregate policy reserves for life insurance products according to SFAS 97 and investments held on account and at risk of life insurance policyholders from investing activities to financing activities. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 Net cash used in operating activities was E670 million in 2002, compared to net cash used in operating activities of E775 million in 2001. The decrease in net cash used reflected primarily a 114 significant increase in cash provided by trading securities (including trading liabilities), offset in part by increases in cash used in other operating activities. Cash provided by trading securities (including trading liabilities) increased to E14,064 million provided in 2002 from E12,544 million used in 2001, a net change of E26,608 million, due primarily to reductions in investments held in the Dresdner Bank trading portfolio and an increase in trading liabilities, which reflected primarily obligations to deliver securities and net declines in the market values of derivative transactions. The reductions in the Dresdner Bank trading portfolio reflected a decline in the carrying value of equity securities. The increase in cash provided by trading securities was offset in part by a decrease in cash provided by loans and advances to banks and customers to E5,846 million used in 2002 from E3,442 million provided in 2001, resulting primarily from a significant increase in short term loans. Cash flow from other receivables and liabilities also decreased to E1,399 million used in 2002 from E3,843 million provided in 2001. Cash flow from certificated liabilities decreased to E1,727 million used in 2002 from E3,130 million provided in 2001, due to repayment of money market liabilities. Cash flow from liabilities to banks and customers decreased to E8,215 million used in 2002 from E5,456 million used in 2001. In addition, we recorded a net loss in 2002 of E1,167 million, a net change of E2,790 million from 2001, when we recorded net income of E1,623 million. Net cash used in investing activities was E13,780 million in 2002, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of E11,395 million in 2001. The significant decrease in net cash from investing activities was due primarily to the decrease in cash and cash equivalents resulting from the deconsolidation of the cash balances of Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG, Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG and Deutsche Hyp in 2002. The aggregate impact of the deconsolidation of these cash balances was E10,787 million. The decrease in 2002 also reflected the high levels of net cash provided by investing activities in 2001, which resulted from a significant increase in cash and cash equivalents due to the first-time consolidation of the cash balances of Dresdner Bank in July 2001. The remaining decrease in investing cash flows in 2002 was due to net purchases of investments, excluding the effects of the above deconsolidations. Net cash provided by financing activities was E14,327 million in 2002, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of E6,393 million in 2001. The increase was attributable primarily to an increase in cash provided by subordinated liabilities, reflecting E3,445 million in subordinated debt issued in 2002. Cash provided by aggregate policy reserves also increased to E10,808 million provided in 2002 from E8,089 million provided in 2001, reflecting the increased net inflow of funds related to variable annuities and unit-linked life insurance policies in line with the overall increase in our life insurance business in 2002. These increases were offset in part by a decrease in cash flow attributable to redemption of participation certificates. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 Net cash used in operating activities was E775 million in 2001, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of E2,476 million in 2000. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in cash provided by trading securities to E12,544 million used in 2001 from E46 million provided in 2000, reflecting a significant increase in trading assets held by Dresdner Bank as a result of trading positions taken at year end. Also contributing to the decrease were a reduction in cash provided by liabilities to banks and customers, which decreased to E5,456 million used in 2001 from E836 million provided in 2000, reflecting repayment of short term loans and deposits over the course of 2001, and an increase in cash used in other insurance reserves, which decreased to E4,007 million used in 2001 from E2,227 million provided in 2000, reflecting increased premium refunds to policyholders relative to additions to reserves. These decreases were offset in part by an increase in cash provided by loans and advances to banks and customers, which increased to E3,442 million provided in 2001 from E3,694 million used in 2000, due to repayments of loans at Dresdner Bank as well as the lack of new loan volume attributable to our reduction of non-core lending activity outside of Europe. Also offsetting 115 the decrease was an increase in the cash provided by other receivables and liabilities to E3,843 million provided in 2001 from E1,408 million used in 2000 and an increase in unearned premiums written in line with the increase in our overall business volume in 2001. Net cash provided by investing activities was E11,395 million in 2001, compared to net cash used in investing activities of E11,783 million in 2000, reflecting primarily an increase in cash and cash equivalents from the acquisition of consolidated affiliated companies, which increased to E12,114 million provided in 2001 from E3,045 million used in 2000. The increase was attributable primarily to the consolidation of the cash balances of Dresdner Bank in July 2001. Also contributing to the increase in net cash from investing activities was a decrease in cash used in connection with securities available for sale to E3,465 million used in 2001 from E7,271 million used in 2000 and an increase in cash provided by other investments to E2,692 million provided in 2001 from E416 million used in 2000. The net cash provided by financing activities was E6,393 million in 2001, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of E9,577 million in 2000, reflecting primarily a decrease in cash provided by participation certificates and subordinated liabilities to E770 million used in 2001 from E1,714 million provided in 2000. The decrease was offset in part by an increased net inflow of funds related to variable annuities and unit-linked life insurance policies in line with the overall increase in our life insurance business in 2001. PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE RESERVES GENERAL When claims are made by or against policyholders, any amounts that a member of the Allianz Group's property-casualty segment pays or expects to pay the claimant are referred to as losses, and the costs of investigating, resolving and processing these claims are referred to as loss adjustment expenses (or LAE). We establish reserves for payment of losses and LAE for claims that arise from its property-casualty insurance and reinsurance policies by product, coverage and year for each company in the Group. In accordance with IFRS, no specific loss and LAE reserves are established until an event that causes a loss occurs. Loss and LAE falls into two categories: reserves for reported claims and reserves for incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims. Reserves for reported claims are based on estimates of future payments that will be made in respect of claims, including expenses relating to such claims. Such estimates are made on a case-by-case basis, based on the facts and circumstances available at the time the reserves are established. The estimates reflect the informed judgment of our claims personnel based on general insurance reserving practices and knowledge of the nature and value of a specific type of claim. These reserves are periodically adjusted in the ordinary course of settlement and represent the estimated ultimate costs necessary to bring all pending reported claims to final settlement, taking into account inflation, and other societal and economic factors which can influence the amount of the reserves required. Consideration is given to historic trends of disposition patterns and loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and types of coverage. In addition, court decisions, economic conditions and public attitudes may also affect the estimation of reserves, as well as ultimate costs of claims. IBNR reserves are established to recognize the estimated cost of losses that have occurred but about which the Group does not yet have notice. These reserves, like the reserves for reported claims, are established to recognize the estimated costs, including expenses, necessary to bring claims arising out of losses to final settlement. Since nothing is known about the occurrence, the Group relies on its past experience adjusted for current trends and any other factors that would modify past experience to estimate the IBNR liability. These reserves are estimates that involve actuarial and statistical projections of the expected cost of the ultimate settlement and administration of claims. The analyses are based on facts and circumstances 116 known at the time, predictions of future events, estimates of future inflation and other societal and economic factors. Late reported claim trends, claim severity, exposure growth and future inflation are some of the factors used in projecting the IBNR reserve requirements. These reserves are reviewed and revised periodically as additional information becomes available and actual claims are reported. The time required to learn of and settle claims is an important consideration in establishing reserves. Short-tail claims, such as automobile property damage claims, are reported within a few days or weeks and are generally settled within two to three years. Medium-tail claims such as personal and commercial motor liability claims generally take four to six years to settle, while long-tail claims, such as general liability, workers compensation, construction and professional liability claims take longer to settle. Based on the profile of property-casualty reserves for our largest operating entities, we characterize our reserves as approximately 20% short-tail, 40% medium-tail and 40% long-tail. The ultimate cost of loss and LAE is subject to a number of highly variable circumstances. As time passes between when a claim is reported to the final settlement of the claim, a change in circumstances may require established reserves to be adjusted either upwards or downwards. Items such as changes in the legal environment, results of litigation, and changes in medical costs, costs of automobile and home repair materials and labor rates can substantially impact claim costs. These factors can cause actual developments to vary from expectations, perhaps materially. Claims reserve estimates are periodically reviewed and updated, using the most current information available to management, and any adjustments resulting from changes in reserve estimates are reflected in current results of operations. On the basis of the Group's internal procedures, management believes, based on information currently available to it, that the Group's property-casualty reserves are adequate. However, the establishment of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process, and accordingly, there can be no assurance that ultimate losses will not differ from the Group's initial estimates. RECONCILIATION OF BEGINNING AND ENDING LOSS AND LAE RESERVES The following table is a summary reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves of the Allianz Group, including the effect of reinsurance ceded, for the property-casualty insurance segment for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, on an IFRS basis. 117 RECONCILIATION OF LOSS AND LAE RESERVES PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE SEGMENT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Balance as of January 1..................................... 61,476 54,047 51,272 Less reinsurance recoverable................................ 16,156 12,571 12,089 ------ ------ ------ Net......................................................... 45,320 41,476 39,183 ------ ------ ------ Plus incurred related to: Current year.............................................. 27,130 27,295 24,163 Prior years(1)............................................ 646 76 (123) ------ ------ ------ Total incurred.............................................. 27,776 27,371 24,040 ====== ====== ====== Less paid related to: Current year.............................................. 12,642 11,895 11,735 Prior years............................................... 12,143 12,462 11,968 ------ ------ ------ Total paid.................................................. 24,785 24,357 23,703 ------ ------ ------ Effect of foreign exchange.................................. (3,367) 407 649 Effect of acquisitions(2)................................... 122 423 240 Reclassification(3)......................................... -- -- 458 Other(4).................................................... -- -- 609 ------ ------ ------ Net balance at end of year.................................. 45,066 45,320 41,476 Plus reinsurance recoverable................................ 14,588 16,156 12,571 ------ ------ ------ Balance as of December 31................................... 59,654 61,476 54,047 ====== ====== ====== --------------- (1) The favorable development in 2000 is primarily due to our subsidiaries in Germany, Austria and the United Kingdom, offset to some extent by unfavorable run-off in Italy and the United States. The unfavorable development during 2002 is primarily due to increases in asbestos and general liability reserves in the United States. (2) Reserves for loss and LAE of subsidiaries purchased (or sold) are included (or excluded) as of the date of acquisition (or disposition). (3) Represents the movement of certain AGF Belgium reserves from aggregate policy reserves to loss reserves. (4) In 2000, includes the impact of the commutation of a reinsurance agreement with Munich Re (E322.5 million). CHANGES IN HISTORICAL LOSS AND LAE RESERVES The following loss and LAE reserve development table illustrates the change over time of the loss and LAE reserves of the Group at the end of the years indicated. The reserves represent the estimated amount of loss and LAE for claims arising in the current and all prior accident years that are unpaid at the balance sheet date, including IBNR. Since the Group adopted IFRS in 1997, historical loss development data is available on an IFRS basis of accounting for the six years 1997 to 2002 only. 118 The first section of each table shows gross reserves for loss and LAE as initially established at the end of each stated year. The second section, reading down, shows the cumulative amounts paid, gross of reinsurance and retrocessions, as of the end of the successive years with respect to the reserve initially established. The third section shows the retroactive re-estimation of the initially established gross reserves for loss and LAE as of the end of each successive year, which results primarily from the Group's expanded awareness of additional facts and circumstances that pertain to open claims. The last section compares the latest re-estimated gross reserves for loss and LAE to the gross reserves as initially established and indicates the cumulative development of the initially established gross reserves through December 31, 2002. For instance, the surplus (deficiency) shown in the table for each year represents the aggregate amount by which the original estimates of reserves at that year-end have changed in subsequent years. Accordingly, the cumulative surplus (deficiency) for a year-end relates only to reserves at that year-end and such amounts are not additive. Caution should be exercised in evaluating the information shown on this table, as each amount includes the effects of all changes in amounts for prior periods. Conditions and trends that have affected development of liability in the past may or may not necessarily occur in the future, and accordingly, conclusions about future results may not be derived from information presented in this table. CHANGES IN HISTORICAL RESERVES FOR UNPAID LOSS AND LAE PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE SEGMENT GROSS OF REINSURANCE DECEMBER 31,(1) --------------------------------------------------------------- 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ------ -------- -------- ------ -------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Gross liability for unpaid claims and claims expenses.............. 34,323 45,560(2) 51,272(3) 54,047 61,476(4) 59,654 Paid (cumulative) as of: One year later................... 8,573 12,996 15,949 16,639 17,384 Two years later.................. 13,329 20,967 24,132 24,451 Three years later................ 16,778 24,588 29,123 Four years later................. 19,562 27,829 Five years later................. 21,539 Liability re-estimated as of: One year later................... 32,200 46,768 52,663 55,357 60,195 Two years later.................. 33,104 46,975 53,589 55,289 Three years later................ 32,766 47,346 53,101 Four years later................. 33,455 46,687 Five years later................. 33,426 Cumulative surplus (deficiency).... 897 (1,127) (1,829) (1,243) 1,281 Cumulative surplus (deficiency) excluding impact of foreign exchange......................... 1,731 1,511 (1,353) (2,227) (1,572) Percent.......................... 5.0% 3.3% (2.6)% (4.1)% (2.6)% --------------- (1) Reserves for loss and LAE of subsidiaries purchased (or sold) are included (or excluded) as of the date of the acquisition (or disposition). (2) As a result of the acquisition of AGF, loss and LAE reserves at December 31, 1998 increased by E10,658 million on a gross basis. (3) As of December 31, 1999, gross reserves increased by E1.2 billion as a result of the completion of the acquisition of Allianz Australia and by E2.0 billion as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro. 119 (4) As of December 31, 2001, the increase in gross reserves was primarily due to the gross incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. As of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, our consolidated property-casualty reserves reflected discounts of E1,529 million E1,580 million, and E1,445 million, respectively. Reserves are discounted to varying degrees in the United States, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland, Portugal, France and Belgium. For the United States, the discount reflected in the reserves is related to annuities for certain long-tailed liabilities, primarily in workers' compensation. For the other countries, the reserve discounts relate to annuity reserves for various classes of business. These classes include personal accident, general liability and motor liability in Germany and Hungary, workers' compensation in Switzerland and Portugal, individual and group health disability and motor liability in France and health disability in Belgium. All of the reserves that have been discounted have payment amounts that are fixed and timing that is reasonably determinable. The significant increase in the gross reserves for 2001 over 2000 for the Allianz Group companies is driven by gross incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. On a consolidated Group basis, the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 resulted in net claims costs of approximately E1,500 million. Estimated losses are based on a policy-by-policy analysis as well as a variety of actuarial techniques, coverage interpretations and claim estimation methodologies, and include an estimate of incurred but not reported, as well as estimated costs related to the settlement of claims. These loss estimates are subject to considerable uncertainty. Because the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 was a single coordinated event, it is the belief of the Group's management that the losses at the World Trade Center constitute one occurrence. A Group company is currently a defendant in a lawsuit brought by an insured alleging that the attack constituted multiple occurrences. Based on the policy wording, the Group believes it is clear that the attack constitutes one occurrence and intends to defend this matter vigorously. The reserves held at year-end 1997 and year-end 1998 show surpluses of 5.0% and 3.3%, respectively, after adjusting for the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. The surplus is primarily driven by favorable claims experience in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Austria and is offset by adverse development in Italy. The reserves held at year-end 1999, year-end 2000 and year-end 2001 show deficiencies of 2.6%, 4.1% and 2.6%, respectively, after adjusting for the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. The deficiency for year-end 1999 is driven by upward development on claims related to the storms "Lothar" and "Martin" that occurred in Europe in late 1999. Additionally, the strengthening of the reserves U.S. casualty, asbestos and environmental, as well as for motor liability and general liability in Italy during 2001 and 2002 contributed to the deficiencies shown for 1999, 2000 and 2001. The cumulative deficiency in 2001 was also significantly impacted by exchange rate fluctuations between the euro and U.S. dollar, reflecting the reserve additions taken at our U.S. subsidiaries Fireman's Fund and Allianz Insurance Co. INDIVIDUAL COUNTRY RESERVES -- GROSS RESERVES The following five tables present loss development data on a local statutory basis of accounting for Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, the five countries in which we write the majority of our business. Since the Group adopted IFRS in 1997, historical loss development data is not available on a consistent basis of accounting for years prior to 1997. Therefore, the individual country tables 120 presented on the following pages are prepared on a local statutory basis of accounting for each respective country. Generally, under German, French and Italian statutory accounting principles, property-casualty loss and LAE reserves are established based on a case reserving approach. Individual case reserves, set by claims adjusters, are aggregated to determine the overall reserve amounts. In addition, local regulations in some countries require an equalization reserve as a safety margin. In comparison, under IFRS, overall property-casualty reserves are set by analyzing past data and applying actuarial methodologies to this data. In addition, IFRS-based reserves exclude equalization reserves. Consistent with IFRS principles, catastrophe and equalization reserves are not included in the individual country loss and LAE reserves disclosures. The tables for Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom present nine years of loss information, as over 60% of the business in these countries is short and medium tail. The table for the United States presents ten years of loss information, as the Group provides longer tail coverages in this market. GERMANY The loss reserve development table for Germany includes the development of property-casualty reserves for the Group subsidiaries that insure or reinsure property-casualty risks in Germany. The table is presented on a consolidated basis for the Group's subsidiaries in Germany on a German statutory accounting basis, and represents 100% of property-casualty reserves in Germany. In Germany, reserves related to annuities for personal accident, general liability and motor liability claims are discounted. As of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, our German property-casualty reserves reflected discounts of E223 million, E202 million, and E180 million, respectively. DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Gross reserves for unpaid claims and claims expenses............ 10,068 10,787 13,046 13,409 13,235 13,341 13,522 14,642 14,519 Cumulative paid as of: One year later................. 2,080 2,052 2,448 2,444 2,527 2,841 2,721 2,992 Two years later................ 2,875 2,829 3,434 3,328 3,576 3,889 3,872 Three years later.............. 3,334 3,357 3,927 4,013 4,198 4,587 Four years later............... 3,710 3,762 4,421 4,453 4,683 Five years later............... 4,026 4,103 4,766 4,839 Six years later................ 4,299 4,329 5,081 Seven years later.............. 4,480 4,564 Eight years later.............. 4,670 Liability re-estimated as of: One year later................. 9,314 9,780 11,821 11,954 11,982 12,413 12,427 13,483 Two years later................ 8,701 9,144 10,814 10,764 10,916 11,424 11,469 Three years later.............. 8,337 8,542 9,977 10,036 10,279 10,662 Four years later............... 7,913 8,105 9,425 9,549 9,589 Five years later............... 7,602 7,772 9,061 9,003 Six years later................ 7,366 7,518 8,593 Seven years later.............. 7,167 7,513 Eight years later.............. 7,167 Cumulative surplus (deficiency)................. 2,901 3,274 4,453 4,406 3,646 2,679 2,053 1,159 Percent...................... 28.8% 30.4% 34.1% 32.9% 27.5% 20.1% 15.2% 7.9% 121 As a multi-line insurer in the German market, our reserves include diverse property-casualty coverages including motor liability, general liability, property, marine, and credit. In Germany, the general practice is to record statutory reserves based on a prudent case-by-case reserve approach. Statistically, due to favorable outcomes on certain portions of the case reserves, this methodology leads to overall favorable development in the total reserves, leading to statutory reserves that are generally redundant. There were no material changes in the past year in the methods, assumptions or practices of estimating loss reserves in Germany. The increase in the gross reserves for 2001 over 2000 for Allianz Group non-life insurance companies in Germany is driven by gross incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, a majority of which is attributable to reinsurance underwritten by Allianz AG. UNITED STATES The loss reserve development table for the United States includes the development of property-casualty reserves for the Group subsidiaries in the United States that insure or reinsure property-casualty risks. The table is presented on a consolidated basis for the Group's subsidiaries in the United States on a U.S. statutory basis, and represents 100% of property-casualty reserves in the United States. As of December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, our U.S. property-casualty reserves reflected discounts of E316 million, E412 million, and E295 million, respectively. DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Gross reserves for unpaid claims and claims expenses....... 7,972 7,174 7,415 8,633 10,571 10,047 11,932 12,701 16,292 15,860 Cumulative paid as of: One year later........ 1,589 1,536 1,626 2,538 2,589 2,937 4,043 3,966 4,277 Two years later....... 2,557 2,516 3,191 4,099 4,429 5,323 6,284 6,013 Three years later..... 3,213 3,573 4,308 5,455 5,963 6,707 7,715 Four years later...... 3,960 4,432 5,384 6,410 6,882 7,672 Five years later...... 4,569 5,358 6,132 7,087 7,655 Six years later....... 5,436 5,981 6,654 7,745 Seven years later..... 5,991 6,414 7,255 Eight years later..... 6,358 6,970 Nine years later...... 6,890 122 DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Liability re-estimated as of: One year later........ 6,970 7,285 8,260 10,644 10,254 11,711 13,081 13,361 16,899 Two years later....... 7,207 7,984 9,859 10,341 11,286 11,965 13,312 14,429 Three years later..... 7,814 9,274 9,614 11,087 11,374 11,969 14,311 Four years later...... 8,834 9,112 10,250 11,074 11,316 12,853 Five years later...... 8,780 9,687 10,261 10,959 12,277 Six years later....... 9,384 9,710 10,130 11,940 Seven years later..... 9,428 9,597 11,185 Eight years later..... 9,329 10,684 Nine years later...... 10,450 Cumulative surplus (deficiency)........ (2,478) (3,510) (3,770) (3,307) (1,706) (2,806) (2,379) (1,728) (606) Cumulative surplus (deficiency) excluding impact of foreign exchange.... (2,075) (1,958) (1,166) (1,040) (765) (553) (1,601) (2,126) (2,501) Percent........... (26.0)% (27.3)% (15.7)% (12.1)% (7.2)% (5.5)% (13.4)% (16.7)% (15.3)% The Group's portfolio in the United States consists of a diverse group of personal and commercial coverages, including workers' compensation, general liability, automobile liability, property, fire and marine generally written throughout the United States, and as such we are exposed to general developments and risks that affect the entire U.S. property-casualty industry. The significant increase in the gross reserves for 2001 over 2000 for the Allianz Group non-life insurance companies in the United States is driven by incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to the simultaneous terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, nearly all of which is attributable to Allianz Insurance Co. Primary drivers of the increase in 2002 in the estimated liability for prior years were: - Reserve strengthening of US$750 million (net and gross) relating to asbestos and environmental (A&E) exposures at Fireman's Fund for accident years 1987 and prior; - General net reserve strengthening at Fireman's Fund for accident years 1999 and 2000; and Increases of US$1,145 million in gross reserves for general liability and property exposures at Allianz Insurance Co. In 2002 Fireman's Fund completed an analysis of A&E liabilities. The analysis used ground-up exposure-based modeling where appropriate, supplemented by aggregate methods such as average cost models and survival ratio methods. In response to the results of this study, we increased gross asbestos reserves by US$750 million (net and gross) in September 2002, which was within the reasonable range of the analysis and resulted in an unadjusted one-year survival ratio of 12.8 and an unadjusted three-year survival ratio of 15.7. In 1995, Fireman's Fund had increased its net and gross reserves for A&E by US$800 million and in 2000 an additional US$250 million was reallocated to A&E. There are significant uncertainties in estimating the amount of A&E claims. Reserves for asbestos-related illnesses, toxic waste clean-up claims and latent drug and chemical exposures cannot be estimated with traditional loss reserving techniques. Case reserves are established when sufficient information has been obtained to indicate the involvement of a specific insurance policy. In addition, IBNR reserves are established to cover additional exposures on both known and unasserted claims. In establishing the liabilities for claims arising from asbestos-related 123 illnesses, toxic waste clean-up and latent drug and chemical exposures, management considers facts currently known and the current state of the law and coverage litigation. However, given the expansion of coverage and liability by the courts and the legislatures in the past and the possibilities of similar interpretation in the future, there is significant uncertainty regarding the extent of remediation and insurer liability, and given the inherent uncertainty in estimating A&E liabilities, significant adverse deviation from the current carried A&E reserve position is possible. In response to the uncertainty associated with A&E claims, Fireman's Fund has created an environmental claims unit focused on A&E claims evaluation and remediation for our U.S. subsidiaries. The staff of this unit, consisting of a total of approximately 50 employees, determines appropriate coverage issues according to the terms of the policies and contracts involved and, on the basis of its experience and expertise, makes judgments as to the ultimate loss potential related to each claim submitted for payment under the various policies and contracts. Judgments of potential losses are also made from precautionary reports submitted by insured companies for claims which have the possibility of involving policy coverage. Factors considered in determining the reserve are: whether the claim relates to asbestos or hazardous waste; whether the claim is for bodily injury or property damage; the limits of liability and attachment points; policy provisions for expenses (which are a significant portion of the estimated ultimate cost of these claims); type of insured; and any provision for reinsurance recoverables. In addition, Fireman's Fund actively pursues commutations and reinsurance cessions to reduce its A&E exposures. The industry-wide loss trends for some of these exposures, especially for asbestos-related losses, have deteriorated recently. Some of the reasons for this deterioration include: insureds who either produced or installed products containing asbestos have seen more and larger claims brought against them, some of these companies have declared bankruptcy, which has caused plaintiffs' attorneys to seek larger amounts from solvent defendants and to also include new defendants; some defendants are also seeking relief under different coverage provisions when the products liability portion of their coverage has been exhausted. These developments led the Allianz Group to engage outside actuarial consulting firms to update a previous study conducted in 1995 to analyze the adequacy of the Group's reserves for these types of losses. These A&E reserve analyses were completed during 2002, ultimately resulting in an additional US$750 million of reserves attributed entirely to asbestos-related exposures. The analyses included a review of the ultimate gross asbestos loss and allocated loss expense reserves for accident years 1987 and prior. The methodology involved exposure-based modeling of policies with the greatest asbestos exposure, supplemented by aggregate methods for the remaining insureds. The range of reasonable potential outcomes for A&E liabilities provided in these analyses was particularly large, and given the inherent uncertainty in estimating A&E liabilities, significant adverse (or favorable) deviation from the current carried A&E reserve position is possible. The range of net loss and allocated loss expense reserve estimates resulting from our A&E study (based on data evaluated as of December 31, 2001) -- taking into account internal and external actuarial analyses, together with management's estimates concerning such factors as the impact of claims handling efforts, commutations, aggressive reinsurance collection, potential conservatism in the estimates and the recognition that not all outcomes would likely be favorable or unfavorable at the same time (resulting in a compression of the range) -- was US$1,196 million to US$1,965 million, with a midpoint of US$1,580 million. Such range compared to our carried A&E reserves of US$816 million at December 31, 2001, resulting in a deficiency of US$380 million to US$1,149 million. As a result, we increased gross and net A&E reserves by US$750 million in 2002 in order to bring carried A&E reserves at December 31, 2002 to the midpoint of such range. 124 The table below shows Fireman's Fund case count activity for A&E in 2002 and 2001: YEAR TO DATE CASE COUNTS DECEMBER 31, ----------------- PERCENT 2002 2001 CHANGE ------ ------ ------- New......................................................... 495 486 1.9% Reopened.................................................... 241 175 37.7% Closed...................................................... 902 1,906 (52.7)% Pending..................................................... 1,741 1,903 (8.5)% On September 30, 2002, Fireman's Fund entered into a reinsurance contract whereby it ceded all net carried A&E reserves to Allianz AG, with Allianz AG providing reinsurance cover up to a maximum of US$2,158 million. Total A&E reserves ceded under this treaty were US$1,276 million for consideration in the amount of US$1,276 million. The following table summarizes the gross and net U.S. claim reserves for A&E claims at December 31 for the years indicated. AS PERCENTAGE OF AS PERCENTAGE OF U.S. PROPERTY- THE GROUP'S CASUALTY PROPERTY-CASUALTY YEAR-END DECEMBER 31, A&E NET RESERVES A&E GROSS RESERVES GROSS RESERVES GROSS RESERVES --------------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------- ----------------- (E IN MILLIONS) (E IN MILLIONS) 1998................... 982 1,849 18.4% 4.1% 1999................... 883 1,509 12.6% 2.9% 2000................... 1,072 1,778 14.0% 3.3% 2001................... 979 1,649 10.1% 2.7% 2002................... 249 1,704 10.7% 2.9% In addition to the increase in A&E and general liability reserves, in 2002 Fireman's Fund increased reserves for accident years 1999 and 2000 following the re-evaluation of several business segments during our regular quarterly reserve analyses. For 1999, commercial auto liability, medical malpractice, other liability and workers' compensation reserves were increased US$102 million, partially offset by favorable development in commercial multi-peril (US$41 million). Accident year 2000 reserves were increased in commercial auto liability, medical malpractice and other liability (US$141 million), partially offset by favorable development in commercial multi-peril and surety (US$56 million). Two of the major business segments that drove the results for commercial auto liability and medical malpractice above have been reevaluated as businesses that we will not write in the future. For Allianz Insurance Co., the gross increases in general liability reserves in 2002 were based on a thorough actuarial analysis carried out in conjunction with a significant re-underwriting of the company's business. The company discontinued most of its general liability portfolio from mid-2002. Of the gross reserve increases for this segment the majority, US$816 million, relates to the accident years 1997 through 2001. There was substantial reported loss emergence for these years during 2002, partly due to a more conservative case reserving philosophy but mainly due to increased loss activity. It has become apparent over the last year that the development characteristics of accident years 1997 onwards are substantially different than for prior years, being more exposed to severity losses as more excess business was written. In recognition of this, during 2002, we added a frequency severity approach to the standard actuarial projections previously applied. Of the remaining increase, US$130 million is for accident years 1985 and prior, partly for A&E exposures and including US$77 million for potential claims for against priests in California. The US$188 million increase in the property segment is entirely due to additional provisions for the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. 125 The table below shows total A&E loss activity for the past five years for Fireman's Fund and Allianz Insurance Co. These figures are shown gross of reinsurance and on a statutory basis. A & E GROSS LOSS AND LAE HISTORY YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ($ IN MILLIONS) ASBESTOS Loss + LAE Reserves as of January 1.................... 499 957 727 679 596 Plus Incurred Loss and LAE............................. 553 (54) 126 23 688 Less Loss and LAE Payments............................. 95 175 174 106 137 Payments for Loss.................................... 149 142 79 102 Payments for LAE..................................... 26 32 27 35 Loss + LAE Reserves as of December 31.................. 957 727 679 596 1,147 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ($ IN MILLIONS) ENVIRONMENTAL Loss + LAE Reserves as of January 1.................... 1,307 1,205 788 975 863 Plus Incurred Loss and LAE............................. (41) (34) 318 (37) 73 Less Loss and LAE Payments............................. 61 383 131 75 306 Payments for Loss.................................... 349 75 38 259 Payments for LAE..................................... 34 55 37 47 Loss + LAE Reserves as of December 31.................. 1,205 788 975 863 630 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ($ IN MILLIONS) TOTAL ASBESTOS AND ENVIRONMENTAL Loss + LAE Reserves as of January 1................. 1,806 2,162 1,515 1,654 1,459 Plus Incurred Loss and LAE.......................... 512 (88) 444 (13) 760 Less Loss and LAE Payments.......................... 156 558 305 182 443 Payments for Loss................................. 498 217 117 361 Payments for LAE.................................. 60 87 65 83 Loss + LAE Reserves as of December 31............... 2,162 1,515 1,654 1,459 1,776 UNITED KINGDOM The loss reserve development table for the United Kingdom includes the development of property-casualty reserves for the Group subsidiaries that insure or reinsure property-casualty risks in the United Kingdom. The table is presented on a consolidated basis for the Group's subsidiaries on a U.K. GAAP basis, which is similar to an IFRS basis, and represents 100% of property-casualty reserves in the United Kingdom. 126 DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Gross reserves for unpaid claims and claims expenses................................. 1,141 1,158 1,445 1,797 2,727 3,165 3,262 3,557 3,369 Cumulative paid as of: One year later........................... 305 393 469 507 835 911 1,059 1,033 Two years later.......................... 534 627 695 759 1,264 1,496 1,586 Three years later........................ 708 765 856 907 1,622 1,825 Four years later......................... 807 882 947 1,039 1,841 Five years later......................... 897 938 1,031 1,109 Six years later.......................... 934 1,001 1,075 Seven years later........................ 969 1,035 Eight years later........................ 995 Liability re-estimated as of: One year later........................... 1,055 1,349 1,613 1,606 2,960 3,052 3,189 3,153 Two years later.......................... 1,205 1,467 1,467 1,629 2,816 3,013 2,954 Three years later........................ 1,298 1,356 1,485 1,614 2,720 2,873 Four years later......................... 1,203 1,356 1,467 1,506 2,622 Five years later......................... 1,204 1,355 1,407 1,461 Six years later.......................... 1,219 1,330 1,391 Seven years later........................ 1,270 1,322 Eight years later........................ 1,265 Cumulative surplus (deficiency).......... (124) (164) 54 336 105 292 308 404 Cumulative surplus (deficiency) Excluding impact of foreign exchange............. 8 143 228 339 369 259 251 223 Percent................................ 0.7% 12.4% 15.8% 18.9% 13.5% 8.2% 7.7% 6.3% In the United Kingdom, we write a broad mix of property-casualty business for both individual and commercial clients. Our general practice is to record property-casualty reserves at the actuarial best estimate plus a margin for prudence. Accordingly, from 1996 through 2000, we have experienced favorable development in property-casualty claim reserves, which has arisen to differing degrees on almost all lines of business and reflects the approach of calculating reserves on a prudent best estimate basis. This approach reflects industry practice in the United Kingdom. Allianz Cornhill experienced gross incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses related to the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, which was a primary factor in year-to-year reserves development. The periods prior to and including 1995 differ from subsequent periods in that they showed a deficiency for earlier development years before a surplus emerged. This deficiency arose from the strengthening of reserves relating to Marine Excess of Loss business written through the London Market during the late 1980's. This strengthening of Marine reserves more than offset the redundancy emerging from other lines of business at the time. The Group considers that the reserve issues that arose at the time have been fully addressed, as evidenced by the now positive run-off. There were no material changes in reserving assumptions, methods or philosophy during 2002. The table also shows a sharp increase in the level of gross reserves from 1997 to 1998. This is primarily due to the acquisition of AGF in 1998. Reserves from AGF's UK subsidiaries were E1,067 million at December 31, 1998. FRANCE The loss reserve development table for France includes the development of property-casualty reserves for the Group subsidiaries that insure or reinsure property-casualty risks in 127 France. The table is presented on a consolidated basis for the Group's subsidiaries in France on a French statutory accounting basis. All property-casualty lines other than construction, marine, aviation and transportation, and credit are presented on an accident year basis. Construction, marine, aviation and transportation, and credit are presented on an underwriting year basis, consistent with applicable French statutes. Loss reserves presented on an "underwriting year" basis represent claims related to all policies written during a given year. In contrast, "accident year" loss reserves represent claims for events that occurred during a given calendar year, regardless of when the policy was written. Loss reserves on an underwriting year basis may include claims from different accident years. For example, a policy written during 1999 may have losses in accident year 1999 and in accident year 2000. Therefore, underwriting year data as of a particular evaluation date is less mature than accident year data. This leads to loss emergence taking place over a slightly longer period of time. For year-ends 1998 through 2002, the lines of business accounted for on an underwriting year basis accounted for approximately 25% of the Group's reserves in France. At December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, as permitted by applicable French statutes, the Group carried approximately E1.4 billion, E1.4 billion, and E1.4 billion, respectively, in annuity reserves. These annuities reflected discounts of E451 million, E451 million, and E444 million, respectively. These annuities relate to individual and group health disability reserves (included in the non-life segment under the Group's French statutory financial statements) and to motor liability where payment amounts are fixed and the timing is reasonably determinable. The reserve development reflected in the table below includes development attributable to the amortization of the discount. DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Gross reserves for unpaid claims and claims expenses...................................... 1,231 1,275 1,319 1,297 8,468 9,169 9,573 10,277 10,450 Cumulative paid as of: One year later................................ 373 363 345 341 2,076 3,003 2,877 2,642 Two years later............................... 536 518 500 469 3,140 4,358 3,977 Three years later............................. 641 622 594 573 3,826 5,065 Four years later.............................. 723 696 672 648 4,304 Five years later.............................. 780 758 733 707 Six years later............................... 829 803 780 Seven years later............................. 867 840 Eight years later............................. 898 Liability re-estimated as of: One year later................................ 1,230 1,293 1,280 1,279 8,082 10,231 9,860 10,359 Two years later............................... 1,260 1,273 1,271 1,218 8,649 10,033 9,939 Three years later............................. 1,253 1,276 1,222 1,241 8,615 9,863 Four years later.............................. 1,277 1,233 1,234 1,228 8,335 Five years later.............................. 1,242 1,239 1,239 1,261 Six years later............................... 1,215 1,236 1,259 Seven years later............................. 1,252 1,237 Eight years later............................. 1,234 Cumulative surplus (deficiency)............... (3) 39 60 36 132 (694) (366) (82) Percent..................................... (0.3)% 3.1% 4.6% 2.8% 1.6% (7.6)% (3.8)% (0.8)% The Allianz Group companies in France form one of the leading French property-casualty groups. The first-time inclusion of AGF in 1998 resulted in a E5,513 million increase in held reserves at December 31, 1998. 128 The Group's primary property-casualty lines of business in France are motor liability, property, individual and group health, group disability, general liability, construction, marine, aviation and transportation, and credit. Declining frequency trends for motor liability in recent years and a prudent case reserving philosophy for motor liability and general liability have contributed to the favorable run-off reflected in the table for years 1995 through 1997. For 1999, the adverse run-off is primarily due to the upward development during 2000 of losses from the storms "Lothar" and "Martin," which occurred in Europe in late December 1999. During 2002, reserves for AGF IART experienced adverse development of approximately E124 million on assumed reinsurance, approximately E63 million on commercial property and E10 million on general liability. These adverse developments were primarily offset by favorable reserve development on the reserves of EULER & HERMES and Allianz Marine & Aviation. There were no changes in reserving assumptions, methods or policies during 2002. For commercial property, the development was primarily attributable to the 2001 accident year, with smaller offsetting favorable development for prior accident years. For general liability, the development arose primarily from the 2000 and 2001 accident years. These changes in reserve estimates are not attributable to changes in actuarial assumptions, or trends in claim frequency, severity or similar factors. Between 1999 and 2001, four distinct legal entities (AGF IART, Allianz Assurances, PFA TIARD and CAMAT IARD) were merged into AGF IART, and the reserve adjustments noted reflect changes in claims practices and data processing systems resulting from the integration of systems and processes due to such restructuring. ITALY The loss reserve development table for Italy includes the development of property-casualty reserves for the Group subsidiaries that insure or reinsure property-casualty risks in Italy. The table is presented on a consolidated basis for the Group's subsidiaries in Italy on an Italian statutory accounting basis, and represents 100% of property-casualty reserves in Italy. DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Gross reserves for unpaid claims and claims expenses....................... 2,379 3,471 3,829 4,029 4,640 5,040 5,560 6,097 6,508 Cumulative paid as of: One year later........................ 888 1,308 1,487 1,562 1,824 1,940 2,092 2,060 Two years later....................... 1,280 1,989 2,152 2,308 2,626 2,879 2,957 Three years later..................... 1,534 2,372 2,571 2,742 3,173 3,357 Four years later...................... 1,717 2,660 2,861 3,101 3,496 Five years later...................... 1,859 2,877 3,129 3,334 Six years later....................... 1,989 3,084 3,306 Seven years later..................... 2,118 3,222 Eight years later..................... 2,208 129 DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Liability re-estimated as of: One year later........................ 2,376 3,527 3,829 4,037 4,650 5,091 5,687 6,021 Two years later....................... 2,333 3,524 3,804 4,147 4,788 5,332 5,677 Three years later..................... 2,404 3,605 3,938 4,279 4,984 5,286 Four years later...................... 2,449 3,710 4,049 4,429 4,904 Five years later...................... 2,498 3,796 4,162 4,337 Six years later....................... 2,547 3,879 4,061 Seven years later..................... 2,165 3,789 Eight years later..................... 2,547 Cumulative surplus (deficiency)....... (168) (319) (232) (309) (264) (247) (117) 75 Percent............................. (7.0)% (9.1)% (6.0)% (7.6)% (5.7)% (4.9)% (2.1)% 1.2% The Allianz Group companies in Italy form one of the leading Italian property-casualty groups. The property-casualty reserve portfolio in Italy consists predominantly of motor liability and general liability. During the past few calendar years, adverse development in the Italian general liability market has occurred due to an increase in late-reported claims. In addition, an increase in personal injuries for motor liability, coupled with an increase in the average cost of claims, has led to an increase in the ultimate cost of claims for motor liability. As a result, during the last several calendar years, but especially during 2001 and 2002, reserves for motor liability and general liability were strengthened at the RAS Group across several accident years. These adverse developments were however more than offset by favorable development in 2002 for other lines and other companies in Italy. There were no material changes during 2002 to reserving assumptions, methods or philosophy. SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION RELATING TO OUR BANKING OPERATIONS For the purposes of presenting the following information, our banking operations include Dresdner Bank AG and its subsidiaries (Dresdner Bank), including its asset management operations, and certain other banking subsidiaries of Allianz. This presentation differs from the presentation in the remainder of "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects", where the asset management operations of Dresdner Bank are included in our asset management segment and excluded from our banking segment. The following information has been derived from the financial records of our banking operations and has been prepared in accordance with IFRS; it does not reflect adjustments necessary to convert such information to U.S. GAAP. Although the financial statements of Dresdner Bank were consolidated into the financial statements of Allianz AG on the date of our acquisition of Dresdner Bank on July 23, 2001, the information presented below includes the banking operations of Dresdner Bank for all periods in order to provide the reader with comparable information about our banking operations. Additionally, the assets and liabilities of Dresdner Bank do not reflect the purchase accounting adjustments applied with respect to Dresdner Bank's assets and liabilities at July 23, 2001. Additional limitations concerning certain of the average balance sheet data of Dresdner Bank for the periods ending before January 1, 2002 discussed in this section are noted below under "-- Average Balance Sheet and Interest Rate Data." In applying our accounting policies to the financial statements of Dresdner Bank during periods prior to July 23, 2001, certificated commercial loans common to the German market, or Schuldscheindarlehen, have been reclassified from Loans and advances to banks and Loans and advances to customers to Investment securities available for sale in order to conform to our accounting policies. At December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998, the book value of Schuldscheindarlehen was approximately E1.4 billion, E44.0 billion, E46.6 billion, E48.6 billion and 130 E49.1 billion, respectively. Because there were no loss allowances recorded on such Schuldscheindarlehen, such reclassification had no impact on the gross amount of the loss allowances described below under "-- Summary of Loan Loss Experience." However, such reclassification did adversely affect the ratio of total allowances for loan losses to total loans. On August 1, 2002, we also merged our mortgage banking subsidiary, Deutsche Hyp, which was a part of our Other division, with the mortgage banking subsidiaries of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank into a single entity, Eurohypo. The assets and liabilities of the former Deutsche Hyp were accordingly deconsolidated as of August 1, 2002. AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND INTEREST RATE DATA The following table sets forth the average balances of assets and liabilities and related interest earned from interest-earning assets and interest expensed on interest-bearing liabilities, as well as the resulting average interest yields and rates for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the average balance sheet and interest rate data is based on consolidated monthly average balances using month-end balances prepared in accordance with IFRS. For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, Dresdner Bank did not prepare consolidated balance sheet and interest rate data on a monthly basis. The average balance sheet and interest rate data shown below for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 was derived using unconsolidated monthly balances of Dresdner Bank AG and its non-German branch operations and significant subsidiaries, together with quarterly consolidated balances of Dresdner Bank prepared in accordance with IFRS. Such unconsolidated monthly balances reflected approximately 90% of Dresdner Bank's consolidated assets and liabilities, were not available for all months in the periods shown, and were not in all cases prepared fully in accordance with IFRS. Dresdner Bank has reconciled such monthly balances to the consolidated quarterly balances that were not subject to these limitations, and the data shown below reflects adjustments to give effect to differences identified in such a reconciliation process. We believe that the average balances provide a fair representation of the activities of our banking operations. Since the adoption of IAS 39 on January 1, 2001, the fair values of all derivative instruments have been included within non-interest-earning assets or non-interest-bearing liabilities. Prior to January 1, 2001, the fair values of qualifying hedge derivative instruments were not recorded in the balance sheet; however, the fair values of all non-qualifying hedge and trading derivatives have been included within non-interest-earning assets or non-interest-bearing liabilities for each period. Interest income and interest expense relating to qualifying hedge derivative instruments have been reported within the interest income and interest expense of the hedged item for each period. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the location of the office that recorded the transaction. Categories of loans and advances include loans placed on nonaccrual status. For a description of our accounting policies on nonaccrual loans see "-- Risk Elements -- Nonaccrual loans." Our banking operations do not have a significant balance of tax-exempt investments. Accordingly, interest income on such investments has been included as taxable interest income for purposes of calculating the change in taxable net interest income. 131 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) ASSETS Trading securities In German offices................ 57,523 1,681 2.9% 56,220 2,075 3.7% 38,637 1,387 3.6% In non-German offices............ 30,155 1,137 3.8% 30,020 1,484 4.9% 22,093 1,057 4.8% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 87,678 2,818 3.2% 86,240 3,559 4.1% 60,730 2,444 4.0% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Loans and advances to banks In German offices................ 15,708 454 2.9% 22,028 744 3.4% 17,632 651 3.7% In non-German offices............ 9,966 343 3.4% 18,009 776 4.3% 12,853 1,271 9.9% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 25,674 797 3.1% 40,037 1,520 3.8% 30,485 1,922 6.3% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Loans and advances to customers In German offices................ 112,709 5,490 4.9% 131,346 8,339 6.3% 133,241 7,391 5.5% In non-German offices............ 45,760 2,413 5.3% 56,144 3,741 6.7% 50,850 3,627 7.1% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 158,469 7,903 5.0% 187,490 12,080 6.4% 184,091 11,018 6.0% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Securities purchased under resale agreements In German offices................ 56,213 2,109 3.8% 46,890 2,267 4.8% 24,895 1,180 4.7% In non-German offices............ 38,059 794 2.1% 41,254 1,545 3.7% 33,170 1,656 5.0% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 94,272 2,903 3.1% 88,144 3,812 4.3% 58,065 2,836 4.9% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Investment securities(1) In German offices................ 35,017 1,584 4.5% 59,346 2,929 4.9% 60,712 3,310 5.5% In non-German offices............ 9,893 401 4.1% 10,577 469 4.4% 10,460 702 6.7% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 44,910 1,985 4.4% 69,923 3,398 4.9% 71,172 4,012 5.6% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total interest-earning assets...... 411,003 16,406 4.0% 471,834 24,369 5.2% 404,543 22,232 5.5% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Non-interest-earning assets In German offices................ 49,686 49,006 30,123 In non-German offices............ 29,206 22,101 30,702 ------- ------- ------- Total non-interest-earning assets........................... 78,892 71,107 60,825 ------- ------- ------- Total assets....................... 489,895 542,941 465,368 ======= ======= ======= Percent of assets attributable to non-German offices............... 33.3% 32.8% 34.4% LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Liabilities to banks(2) In German offices................ 58,881 1,978 3.4% 71,681 2,765 3.9% 49,420 2,026 4.1% In non-German offices............ 23,284 1,081 4.6% 30,217 2,301 7.6% 21,602 2,121 9.8% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 82,165 3,059 3.7% 101,898 5,066 5.0% 71,022 4,147 5.8% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Liabilities to customers(2) In German offices................ 71,296 1,906 2.7% 99,113 2,713 2.7% 90,666 2,040 2.3% In non-German offices............ 36,977 1,126 3.0% 46,628 1,653 3.5% 40,780 2,172 5.3% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 108,273 3,032 2.8% 145,741 4,366 3.0% 131,446 4,212 3.2% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ 132 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------------- INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) Securities sold under repurchase agreements In German offices................ 40,328 1,544 3.8% 39,327 1,958 5.0% 20,441 917 4.5% In non-German offices............ 26,840 588 2.2% 37,548 1,315 3.5% 33,661 1,640 4.9% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 67,168 2,132 3.2% 76,875 3,273 4.3% 54,102 2,557 4.7% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Subordinated liabilities In German offices................ 4,541 206 4.5% 4,439 189 4.3% 4,355 176 4.0% In non-German offices............ 4,661 361 7.7% 4,793 458 9.6% 4,335 369 8.5% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 9,202 567 6.2% 9,232 647 7.0% 8,690 545 6.3% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Certificated liabilities(2) In German offices................ 42,166 2,507 5.9% 71,266 4,628 6.5% 73,717 4,803 6.5% In non-German offices............ 56,854 2,108 3.7% 44,657 2,440 5.5% 45,818 2,683 5.9% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 99,020 4,615 4.7% 115,923 7,068 6.1% 119,535 7,486 6.3% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Profit participation certificates outstanding In German offices................ 1,771 133 7.5% 2,052 76 3.7% 2,034 64 3.1% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total............................ 1,771 133 7.5% 2,052 76 3.7% 2,034 64 3.1% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Total interest-bearing liabilities...................... 367,599 13,538 3.7% 451,721 20,496 4.5% 386,829 19,011 4.9% ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ Non-interest-bearing liabilities In German offices................ 64,014 34,196 27,538 In non-German offices............ 39,288 34,576 38,693 ------- ------- ------- Total non-interest-bearing liabilities...................... 103,302 68,772 66,231 ------- ------- ------- Shareholders' equity............... 18,994 22,448 12,308 ------- ------- ------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity........................... 489,895 542,941 465,368 ======= ======= ======= Percent of liabilities attributable to non-German offices............ 39.9% 38.1% 40.8% --------------- (1) The average yields for investment securities available for sale have been calculated using amortized cost balances and do not include changes in fair value recorded within a component of shareholders' equity. The average yields for investment securities held to maturity have been calculated using amortized cost balances. (2) Interest-bearing deposits have been presented within liabilities to banks and liabilities to customers; certificates of deposit have been presented within certificated liabilities. NET INTEREST MARGIN The following table sets forth the average total interest-earning assets, net interest earned and the net interest margin of our banking operations. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------- ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) Average total interest-earning assets....................... 411,003 471,834 404,543 Net interest earned(1)...................................... 2,868 3,873 3,221 Net interest margin(2)...................................... 0.70% 0.82% 0.80% --------------- 133 (1) Net interest earned is defined as total interest income less total interest expense. (2) Net interest margin is defined as net interest earned divided by average total interest-earning assets. The following table sets forth an allocation of changes in interest income, interest expense and net interest income between changes in the average volume and changes in the average interest rates for the two most recent years. Volume and interest rate variances have been calculated based on movements in average balances over the period and changes in interest rates on average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities. Changes due to a combination of volume and rate are allocated proportionally to the absolute change in volume and rate. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 OVER 2001 2001 OVER 2000 -------------------- -------------------- INCREASE/(DECREASE) INCREASE/(DECREASE) DUE TO CHANGE IN: DUE TO CHANGE IN: -------------------- -------------------- AVERAGE AVERAGE TOTAL INTEREST AVERAGE TOTAL INTEREST AVERAGE CHANGE RATE VOLUME CHANGE RATE VOLUME ------ --------- -------- ------ --------- -------- (E IN MILLIONS) INTEREST INCOME Trading securities In German offices............................. (394) (441) 47 688 40 648 In non-German offices......................... (347) (354) 7 427 36 391 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (741) (795) 54 1,115 76 1,039 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Loans and advances to banks In German offices............................. (290) (97) (193) 93 (59) 152 In non-German offices......................... (433) (135) (298) (495) (885) 390 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (723) (232) (491) (402) (944) 542 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Loans and advances to customers In German offices............................. (2,849) (1,770) (1,079) 948 1,054 (106) In non-German offices......................... (1,328) (704) (624) 114 (248) 362 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (4,177) (2,474) (1,703) 1,062 806 256 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Securities purchased under resale agreements In German offices............................. (158) (561) 403 1,087 24 1,063 In non-German offices......................... (751) (639) (112) (111) (465) 354 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (909) (1,200) 291 976 (441) 1,417 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Investment securities In German offices............................. (1,345) (227) (1,118) (381) (308) (73) In non-German offices......................... (68) (39) (29) (233) (241) 8 Total......................................... (1,413) (266) (1,147) (614) (549) (65) ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total interest income........................... (7,963) (4,967) (2,996) 2,137 (1,052) 3,189 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- INTEREST EXPENSE Liabilities to banks In German offices............................. (787) (331) (456) 739 (126) 865 In non-German offices......................... (1,220) (768) (452) 180 (544) 724 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (2,007) (1,099) (908) 919 (670) 1,589 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- 134 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 OVER 2001 2001 OVER 2000 -------------------- -------------------- INCREASE/(DECREASE) INCREASE/(DECREASE) DUE TO CHANGE IN: DUE TO CHANGE IN: -------------------- -------------------- AVERAGE AVERAGE TOTAL INTEREST AVERAGE TOTAL INTEREST AVERAGE CHANGE RATE VOLUME CHANGE RATE VOLUME ------ --------- -------- ------ --------- -------- (E IN MILLIONS) Liabilities to customers In German offices............................. (807) (62) (745) 673 471 202 In non-German offices......................... (527) (213) (314) (519) (799) 280 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (1,334) (275) (1,059) 154 (328) 482 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Securities sold under repurchase agreements In German offices............................. (414) (463) 49 1,041 111 930 In non-German offices......................... (727) (413) (314) (325) (499) 174 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (1,141) (876) (265) 716 (388) 1,104 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Subordinated liabilities In German offices............................. 17 13 4 13 9 4 In non-German offices......................... (97) (85) (12) 89 48 41 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (80) (72) (8) 102 57 45 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Certificated liabilities In German offices............................. (2,121) (363) (1,758) (175) (16) (159) In non-German offices......................... (332) (900) 568 (243) (176) (67) ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Total......................................... (2,453) (1,263) (1,190) (418) (192) (226) ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- Profit participation certificates outstanding In German offices............................. 57 69 (12) 12 11 1 Total......................................... 57 69 (12) 12 11 1 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE.......................... (6,958) (3,516) (3,442) 1,485 (1,510) 2,995 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- CHANGE IN TAXABLE NET INTEREST INCOME........... (1,005) (1,451) 446 652 458 194 ====== ====== ====== ===== ====== ===== RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS The following table sets forth the net income, average shareholders' equity and selected financial information and ratios of our banking operations. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------- ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) Net (loss)/income........................................... (944) 539 1,809 Average shareholders' equity................................ 18,994 22,448 12,308 Return on assets(1)......................................... (0.19)% 0.10% 0.39% Return on equity(2)......................................... (4.97)% 2.40% 14.70% Equity to assets ratio(3)................................... 3.88% 4.13% 2.64% --------------- (1) Return on assets is defined as net income of our banking operations divided by average total assets of our banking operations. (2) Return on equity is defined as net (loss)/income of our banking operations divided by average shareholders' equity of our banking operations. (3) Equity to assets ratio is defined as average shareholders' equity of our banking operations divided by average total assets of our banking operations. 135 TRADING AND INVESTMENT SECURITIES The following table sets forth the book value of trading and investment securities held by our banking operations by type of issuer. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the issuer. AT DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 -------- ------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) TRADING SECURITIES GERMAN: Federal and state government and government agency debt securities........................................... 14,304 8,267 4,225 Local government debt securities....................... 2,573 3,153 1,611 Corporate debt securities.............................. 34,645 35,326 29,892 Mortgage-backed securities............................. 403 50 -- Equity securities...................................... 412 1,147 2,661 -------- ------- ------ German total........................................... 52,337 47,943 38,389 -------- ------- ------ NON-GERMAN: U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency debt securities........................................... 5,798 802 610 Other government and official institution debt securities........................................... 23,568 29,509 22,477 Corporate debt securities.............................. 8,066 12,667 11,734 Mortgage-backed securities............................. 1,021 474 -- Equity securities...................................... 8,668 13,917 9,762 -------- ------- ------ Non-German total....................................... 47,121 57,369 44,583 -------- ------- ------ TOTAL TRADING SECURITIES.................................... 99,458 105,312 82,972 ======== ======= ====== SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE GERMAN: Federal and state government and government agency debt securities........................................... 581 6,691 7,030 Local government debt securities....................... 1,840 24,842 25,517 Corporate debt securities.............................. 7,534 21,566 24,196 Mortgage-backed and other debt securities.............. 22 63 73 Equity securities...................................... 3,951 7,003 7,295 -------- ------- ------ German total........................................... 13,928(1) 60,165 64,111 -------- ------- ------ NON-GERMAN: U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency debt securities........................................... 227 453 916 Other government and official institution debt securities........................................... 2,550 6,884 6,467 Corporate debt securities.............................. 5,337 6,270 5,626 Mortgage-backed and other debt securities.............. 520 105 19 Equity securities...................................... 3,097 3,297 2,863 -------- ------- ------ Non-German total....................................... 11,731 17,009 15,891 -------- ------- ------ TOTAL SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE......................... 25,659 77,174 80,002 ======== ======= ====== 136 AT DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 -------- ------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS) SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY GERMAN: Mortgage-backed securities............................. -- 301 219 -------- ------- ------ German total........................................... -- 301 219 -------- ------- ------ NON-GERMAN: Other government and official institution debt securities........................................... 579 558 593 Corporate debt securities.............................. 145 152 165 -------- ------- ------ Non-German total....................................... 724 710 758 -------- ------- ------ TOTAL SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY........................... 724 1,011 977 ======== ======= ====== --------------- (1) Change from 2001 to 2002 reflects primarily the August 2002 deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp. At December 31, 2002, our banking operations held ordinary shares of Munich Re that had a book value in excess of ten percent of the shareholders' equity of our banking operations. The aggregate shareholders' equity of Dresdner Bank and our other banking operations was approximately E13,036 million at December 31, 2002. The aggregate book value and market value of such ordinary shares were E1,518 million at December 31, 2002. MATURITY ANALYSIS OF DEBT INVESTMENT SECURITIES The following table sets forth an analysis of the contractual maturity and weighted average yields of our banking operations' debt investment securities. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturity dates because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the issuer. 137 AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------- DUE AFTER DUE AFTER DUE IN ONE YEAR FIVE YEARS ONE YEAR THROUGH THROUGH DUE AFTER OR LESS FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS TEN YEARS TOTAL -------- ---------- ---------- --------- ------ (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE GERMAN: Federal and state government and government agency debt securities................................. 206 170 156 49 581 Local government debt securities.................. 6 1,139 675 20 1,840 Corporate debt securities......................... 1,479 4,759 1,236 60 7,534 Mortgage-backed and other debt securities......... -- 22 -- -- 22 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ German total...................................... 1,691 6,090 2,067 129 9,977 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ NON-GERMAN: U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency debt securities................................. 1 1 4 221 227 Other government and official institution debt securities...................................... 1,084 688 524 254 2,550 Corporate debt securities......................... 2,260 2,233 518 326 5,337 Mortgage-backed and other debt securities......... 495 16 6 3 520 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Non-German total.................................. 3,840 2,938 1,052 804 8,634 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ TOTAL SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE................... 5,531 9,028 3,119 933 18,611 ====== ====== ====== ===== ====== WEIGHTED AVERAGE YIELD................................ 3.4% 4.1% 5.0% 5.6% 4.1% SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY GERMAN: Mortgage-backed securities........................ -- -- -- -- -- ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ German total...................................... -- -- -- -- -- ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ NON-GERMAN: Other government and official institution debt securities...................................... 489 90 -- -- 579 Corporate debt securities......................... 145 -- -- -- 145 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Non-German total.................................. 634 90 -- -- 724 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ TOTAL SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY..................... 634 90 -- -- 724 ====== ====== ====== ===== ====== WEIGHTED AVERAGE YIELD................................ 7.2% 9.3% -- -- 7.5% 138 LOAN PORTFOLIO The following table sets forth an analysis of our loan portfolio, excluding allowances for loan losses, net of unearned income, according to the industry sector of borrowers. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the borrower. AT DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry.............. 9,728 10,825 11,539 11,014 12,459 Construction........................ 1,226 1,813 2,042 2,228 3,378 Wholesale and retail trade.......... 6,041 7,165 7,419 7,555 9,988 Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies.... 2,810 4,896 4,196 926 4,090 Banks............................... 611 517 601 2,342 628 Service providers................... 13,797 22,943 21,326 23,658 15,243 Other............................... 2,911 3,974 3,067 4,416 3,048 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Corporate total..................... 37,124 52,133 50,190 52,139 48,834 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Public authorities..................... 212 718 540 276 1,101 Private individuals (including self- employed professionals)............. 43,041 63,773 65,883 64,706 60,545 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- German total........................... 80,377 116,624 116,613 117,121 110,480 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- NON-GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry, construction, wholesale and retail trade and service providers....... 21,846 38,383 43,771 39,197 24,586 Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies.... 6,312 10,285 10,166 8,100 7,379 Banks............................... 3,348 5,157 6,287 6,645 8,888 Other............................... 9,144 3,899 3,536 3,405 4,446 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Corporate total..................... 40,650 57,724 63,760 57,347 45,299 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Public authorities..................... 2,065 3,458 990 2,913 1,239 Private individuals (including self- employed professionals)............. 11,046 10,601 10,151 9,922 9,595 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Non-German total....................... 53,761 71,783 74,901 70,182 56,133 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- TOTAL LOANS.............................. 134,138 188,407 191,514 187,303 166,613 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= The following table sets forth our banking operations' mortgage loans and finance leases that are included within the above analysis of loans. AT DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ (E IN MILLIONS) Mortgage loans................................. 39,683 57,315 61,303 60,587 55,975 Finance leases................................. 1,104 2,414 1,430 1,778 1,568 139 LOAN CONCENTRATIONS Although our loan portfolio is diversified across more than 152 countries, at December 31, 2002 approximately 59.9% of our total loans were to borrowers in Germany. At December 31, 2002, our largest credit exposures to borrowers in Germany were loans to private individuals (including self-employed professionals). Approximately 54.3% of these loans are residential mortgage loans, which represent approximately 17.4% of our total loans. Our residential mortgage loans include owner-occupied, single- and two-family homes and apartment dwellings and investment properties. Our residential mortgage loans are well diversified across all German states. Our remaining loans to private individuals in Germany primarily include other consumer installment loans and loans to self-employed professionals, which are also geographically diversified across Germany. We have no other concentrations of loans to private individuals (including self-employed professionals) in Germany in excess of ten percent of our total loans. Our corporate customers are broadly diversified. At December 31, 2002, approximately 10.3% of our total loans were to German corporate customers in various services industries, including utilities, media, transportation and other service providers. However, none of those industries are individually significant to our domestic loan portfolio and we have no concentrations of loans to borrowers in any services industry in excess of ten percent of our total loans. At December 31, 2002, approximately 23.1% of our total loans were to non-financial corporate borrowers outside Germany. These loans are well diversified across various commercial industries, including: PERCENT OF TOTAL LOANS ----------- Manufacturing industry...................................... 6.9% Construction................................................ 1.6% Wholesale and retail trade.................................. 1.1% Telecommunications.......................................... 1.5% Transportation.............................................. 1.1% Other service providers(1).................................. 4.1% Other....................................................... 6.8% --------------- (1) Other services providers include media, utilities, natural resources and other services. We have no concentrations of loans to non-financial corporate borrowers in any industry in excess of ten percent of our total loans. 140 MATURITY ANALYSIS OF LOAN PORTFOLIO The following table sets forth an analysis of the contractual maturity of our loans at December 31, 2002. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the borrower. AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 -------------------------------------------- DUE AFTER DUE IN ONE YEAR ONE YEAR THROUGH DUE AFTER OR LESS FIVE YEARS FIVE YEARS TOTAL -------- ---------- ---------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry....................... 5,238 3,158 1,332 9,728 Construction................................. 884 150 192 1,226 Wholesale and retail trade................... 3,477 1,839 725 6,041 Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies....................... 1,495 1,043 272 2,810 Banks........................................ 354 181 76 611 Service providers: Telecommunication......................... 10 497 104 611 Transportation............................ 300 157 390 847 Other service providers................... 5,420 3,763 3,156 12,339 Total service providers...................... 5,730 4,417 3,650 13,797 Other........................................ 1,462 972 477 2,911 ------ ------ ------ ------- Corporate total.............................. 18,640 11,760 6,724 37,124 ------ ------ ------ ------- Public authorities................................ 180 24 8 212 Private individuals (including self-employed professionals): Residential mortgage loans..................... 277 5,643 17,450 23,370 Consumer installment loans..................... 3,154 0 0 3,154 Other.......................................... 5,872 1,848 8,797 16,517 Total private individuals (including self-employed professionals)................................. 9,303 7,491 26,247 43,041 ------ ------ ------ ------- German total...................................... 28,123 19,275 32,979 80,377 ------ ------ ------ ------- NON-GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry....................... 4,600 3,801 831 9,232 Construction................................. 417 1,094 700 2,211 Wholesale and retail trade................... 870 574 57 1,501 Service Providers: Telecommunication......................... 326 1,370 276 1,972 Transportation............................ 253 575 628 1,456 Other service providers................... 2,698 2,326 450 5,474 Total service providers...................... 3,277 4,271 1,354 8,902 Total manufacturing industry, construction, wholesale and retail trade and service providers................................. 9,164 9,740 2,942 21,846 141 AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 -------------------------------------------- DUE AFTER DUE IN ONE YEAR ONE YEAR THROUGH DUE AFTER OR LESS FIVE YEARS FIVE YEARS TOTAL -------- ---------- ---------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies....................... 1,633 3,128 1,551 6,312 Banks........................................ 2,007 994 347 3,348 Other........................................ 5,768 1,867 1,509 9,144 ------ ------ ------ ------- Corporate total.............................. 18,572 15,729 6,349 40,650 ------ ------ ------ ------- Public authorities................................ 1,702 188 175 2,065 Private individuals (including self-employed professionals): Residential mortgage loans................ 850 2,702 5,368 8,920 Consumer installment loans................ 43 52 34 129 Other..................................... 1,197 276 524 1,997 Total private individuals......................... 2,090 3,030 5,926 11,046 ------ ------ ------ ------- Non-German total.................................. 22,364 18,947 12,450 53,761 ------ ------ ------ ------- TOTAL LOANS......................................... 50,487 38,222 45,429 134,138 ====== ====== ====== ======= The following table sets forth the total amount of loans due after one year with predetermined interest rates and floating or adjustable interest rates at December 31, 2002. Loans with predetermined interest rates are loans for which the interest rate is fixed for the entire term of the loan. All other loans are considered floating or adjustable interest rate loans. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the borrower. AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 ---------------------------------------- LOANS WITH LOANS WITH FLOATING OR PREDETERMINED ADJUSTABLE INTEREST RATES INTEREST RATES TOTAL -------------- -------------- ------ (E IN MILLION) GERMAN: Private individuals (including self-employed professionals)..................................... 31,098 2,640 33,738 Corporate and public customers........................ 12,446 6,070 18,516 German total............................................ 43,544 8,710 52,254 NON-GERMAN: Private individuals (including self-employed professionals)..................................... 2,637 6,319 8,956 Corporate and public customers........................ 5,763 16,678 22,441 Non-German total........................................ 8,400 22,997 31,397 Total................................................... 51,944 31,707 83,651 142 RISK ELEMENTS NON-PERFORMING LOANS The following table sets forth the outstanding balance of our non-performing loans. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the borrower. AT DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) NONACCRUAL LOANS: German.......................................... 7,355 8,751 7,991 7,516 6,322 Non-German...................................... 3,097 2,404 1,928 1,618 869 ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- Total nonaccrual loans.......................... 10,452 11,155 9,919 9,134 7,191 ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== LOANS PAST DUE 90 DAYS AND STILL ACCRUING INTEREST: German.......................................... 644 1,640 1,238 1,526 1,876 Non-German...................................... 151 309 300 305 196 ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- Total loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest..................................... 795 1,949 1,538 1,831 2,072 ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS: German.......................................... 65 215 253 261 307 Non-German...................................... 313 336 323 289 294 ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- Total troubled debt restructurings.............. 378 551 576 550 601 ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== NONACCRUAL LOANS Nonaccrual loans are loans on which interest income is no longer recognized on an accrual basis and loans for which a specific provision is recorded for the full amount of accrued interest receivable. We place loans on nonaccrual status when we determine, based on management's judgment, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any accrued and unpaid interest receivable is reversed and charged against interest income. We restore loans to accrual status only when interest and principal are made current in accordance with the contractual terms and, in management's judgment, future payments are reasonably assured. When we have doubts about the ultimate collectibility of the principal of a loan placed on nonaccrual status, all cash receipts are recorded as reductions in principal. Once the recorded principal amount of the loan is reduced to zero, future cash receipts are recognized as interest income. For all remaining loans, interest income is recognized when received. LOANS PAST DUE 90 DAYS AND STILL ACCRUING INTEREST Loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest are loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest on which we continue to recognize interest income on an accrual basis. TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS Troubled debt restructurings are loans that we have restructured due to a deterioration in the borrower's financial position and in relation to which, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's deteriorated financial position, we have granted a concession to the borrower that we would not have otherwise granted. 143 INTEREST INCOME ON NON-PERFORMING LOANS The following table sets forth the gross interest income that would have been recorded during the year ended December 31, 2002 on nonaccrual loans and troubled debt restructurings if such loans had been current in accordance with their original contractual terms and the interest income on such loans that was actually included in interest income during the year ended December 31, 2002. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 --------------------------------- IN GERMAN IN NON-GERMAN OFFICES OFFICES TOTAL --------- ------------- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) Interest income that would have been recorded in accordance with the original contractual terms....................... 341 137 478 Interest income actually recorded........................... 48 30 78 POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS Potential problem loans are loans that are not classified as nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest or troubled debt restructurings, but where known information about possible credit problems causes us to have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result in classifying the loans in one of the three categories of non-performing loans described above. The outstanding balance of our potential problem loans was E2,437 million at December 31, 2002. Each of our potential problem loans has been subject to our normal credit monitoring and review procedures. Of these loans, approximately E576 million have a specific loss allowance. The remaining loans have also been reviewed for impairment, however, based on our estimated measurement of the impairment, no specific loss allowance has been recorded on such loans. Approximately 6% and 2% of our potential problem loans are to private individuals in Germany and Latin America, respectively. The remaining loans are to corporate borrowers in manufacturing, construction, wholesale and retail trade, telecommunication, transportation and other services, including media, utilities, natural resources and other services and other industry sectors. Our potential problem loans to corporate borrowers are diversified across the following geographic regions: AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 PERCENT OF TOTAL POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS -------------------------- Germany..................................................... 62% North America............................................... 11% Europe (excluding Germany).................................. 8% Latin America............................................... 7% Asia/Pacific................................................ 2% Middle East/Africa.......................................... 2% FOREIGN OUTSTANDINGS Cross-border outstandings consist of loans, net of allowances for loan losses, accrued interest receivable, acceptances, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, other interest-bearing investments and other monetary assets that either are recorded in an office that is not in the same country as the domicile of the borrower, guarantor, issuer or counter-party, or are denominated in a currency that is not the local currency of the borrower, guarantor, issuer or counter-party or are net local country claims. Net local country claims are domestic claims 144 recorded in offices outside Germany that are denominated in local or foreign currency and that are not funded by liabilities in the same currency as the claim and recorded in the same office. Our cross-border outstandings are allocated by country based on the country of domicile of the borrower, guarantor, issuer or counter-party of the ultimate credit risk. At head-office level we set limits on and monitor actual cross-border outstandings on a country-by-country basis based on transfer, economic and political risks. The following table sets forth our cross-border outstandings by geographic location for countries that exceeded 0.75% of the total assets of our banking operations. At December 31, 2002, there were no cross-border outstandings that exceeded 0.50% of the total assets of our banking operations in any country currently facing debt restructurings or liquidity problems that we expect would materially impact the borrowers' ability to repay their obligations. AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GOVERNMENT BANKS AND NET LOCAL TOTAL CROSS- PERCENT AND OFFICIAL FINANCIAL COUNTRY BORDER OF TOTAL CROSS-BORDER INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTIONS OTHER(1) CLAIMS OUTSTANDINGS ASSETS(2) COMMITMENTS(3) ------------ ------------ -------- --------- ------------ --------- -------------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) COUNTRY United States......... 1,853 4,708 3,963 -- 10,524 2.53% 13,100 United Kingdom........ 718 3,048 2,803 3,583 10,152 2.44% 5,421 France................ 1,035 3,596 1,511 56 6,198 1.49% 2,498 Italy................. 6,194 1,573 202 1,932 9,901 2.38% 649 Netherlands........... 400 3,233 1,064 -- 4,697 1.13% 1,972 Japan................. 749 476 109 41 1,375 0.33% 1,187 Switzerland........... 79 1,701 964 -- 2,744 0.66% 942 Spain................. 829 948 519 -- 2,296 0.55% 148 AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GOVERNMENT BANKS AND NET LOCAL TOTAL CROSS- PERCENT AND OFFICIAL FINANCIAL COUNTRY BORDER OF TOTAL CROSS-BORDER INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTIONS OTHER(1) CLAIMS OUTSTANDINGS ASSETS(2) COMMITMENTS(3) ------------ ------------ -------- --------- ------------ --------- -------------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) COUNTRY United States......... 1,266 8,200 7,135 1,178 17,779 3.38% 14,301 United Kingdom........ 354 9,472 2,495 -- 12,321 2.34% 7,137 France................ 556 6,834 4,020 -- 11,410 2.17% 124 Italy................. 11,320 1,344 361 1,088 14,113 2.68% 2,409 Netherlands........... 1,408 4,561 2,105 -- 8,074 1.54% -- Japan................. 361 1,334 422 644 2,761 0.53% 3,132 Switzerland........... 86 2,995 1,887 -- 4,968 0.94% 219 Spain................. 2,509 1,530 1,004 32 5,075 0.97% 133 145 AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GOVERNMENT BANKS AND NET LOCAL TOTAL CROSS- PERCENT AND OFFICIAL FINANCIAL COUNTRY BORDER OF TOTAL CROSS-BORDER INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTIONS OTHER(1) CLAIMS OUTSTANDINGS ASSETS(2) COMMITMENTS(3) ------------ ------------ -------- --------- ------------ --------- -------------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) COUNTRY United States......... 1,130 11,944 6,632 1,421 21,127 4.22% 18,568 United Kingdom........ 216 12,398 2,891 -- 15,505 3.09% 6,685 France................ 730 6,454 3,513 -- 10,697 2.14% 69 Italy................. 6,548 3,098 314 77 10,037 2.00% 1,041 Netherlands........... 1,131 4,809 2,510 -- 8,450 1.69% -- Japan................. 966 2,316 424 696 4,402 0.88% 3,204 Switzerland........... 116 3,531 2,181 455 6,283 1.25% 248 Spain................. 2,281 1,430 712 182 4,605 0.92% 775 --------------- (1) Other includes insurance, commercial, industrial, service providers and other corporate counter-parties. (2) Percent of total assets is defined as total cross-border outstandings divided by total assets of our banking operations. The total assets of our banking operations were E415 billion, E526 billion and E501 billion at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. (3) Cross-border commitments have been presented separately as they are not included as cross-border outstandings unless utilized. Total cross-border outstandings disclosed above included E945 million and E668 million of gross loans outstanding to borrowers in the United States that are also disclosed within the category of non-performing loans at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. At December 31, 2002, total cross-border outstandings disclosed above also included E126 million of gross loans outstanding to borrowers in the United States that are also disclosed within the category of potential problem loans. SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE The following discussion of loan loss allowances refers to the banking operations of Dresdner Bank, which represents substantially all of our banking segment, as our other banking operations have not historically been significant. We establish allowances for loan losses in our loan portfolio that represent management's estimate of probable losses at the balance sheet date. We calculate an allowance for each of the following risks that are allocable to identified loans or groups of loans in our portfolio: - a specific loan loss allowance for impaired loans; - a general loan loss allowance for impairments that have been incurred but are not yet identified; and - an allowance for transfer risk, or country risk allowance. We do not maintain any additional reserves that are not allocable to specifically identified loans or groups of loans in the portfolio. SPECIFIC LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCE A specific loan loss allowance is established to provide for specifically identified counter-party risks. Loans are identified as impaired if it is probable that borrowers are no longer able to make their contractually agreed-upon interest and principal payments. Specific loan loss allowances are established for impaired loans. We calculate the specific loan loss allowance based on the guidance provided in IAS 39 and SFAS 114, according to which an impaired loan 146 should be recorded at its estimated recoverable amount either directly, or through the use of an allowance account by recording a charge to the income statement. The estimated recoverable amount is the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate, or if the loan is collateral dependant and foreclosure on the loan is probable, the fair value of the collateral, or if there is an observable market for the loan, the market value of the loan. If the amount of the impairment subsequently increases or decreases due to an event occurring after the initial measurement of impairment, a change in the allowance is recognized in earnings by a charge or a credit to net loan loss provisions. We evaluate each of our loans individually. We use an internal credit rating system implemented in 2002 to assign ratings from 1 to 16 to each loan on the basis of specific quantitative and qualitative customer criteria, including financial condition, historical earnings, management quality, and general industry data, among others. Loans that are classified in the rating categories 15 and 16 are loans that are deemed to be impaired under IAS 39 and SFAS 114. In addition, loans that carry ratings of 13 and 14 are reviewed for potential impairment. Prior to 2002, we used an internal credit rating system that assigned ratings from 1 to 8 to each loan. Loans for which a specific loan loss allowance has previously been established are evaluated on an individual basis if the existing specific loan loss allowance is E500,000 or more. Loans for which a specific loan loss allowance of less than E500,000 has previously been established have been aggregated into portfolios of similar loans by collateral types for evaluation under IAS 39 and SFAS 114. We determine the impairment provision on such portfolios by calculating the average loss rates and the collection periods for different types of collateral and applying a weighted average discount rate to these aggregated expected future cash flows. The results of such calculations are subject to back-testing procedures, such as individual evaluation of sample loans within particular sub-portfolios. GENERAL LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCE General loan loss allowances are established to provide for incurred but unidentified losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio as of the relevant balance sheet date. General allowances for loan losses are established for loans that are impaired but not yet identified as impaired due to the time lag between the occurrence of an impairment event and the detection of that event by our credit risk monitoring systems and controls. Such a time lag may occur due to intervals between impairment tests, ratings reviews and/or a borrower's financial reporting. In order to avoid layering or double counting of both specific and general loan loss allowances, only those loans that have not been deemed impaired under IAS 39 or SFAS 114 are included as part of the portfolio used to establish the general loan loss allowance. The amount of the general loan loss allowance is based on historical loan loss experience and management's evaluation of the loan portfolio under current events and economic conditions. Toward this end, we follow a three-step process. First, we derive an economic measure of future expected credit losses over a given time horizon, based on the application of historical loss data to the loan portfolio as of the most recent balance sheet date. On the basis of the individual ratings that we have assigned, we assign empiric probabilities of default to loans with a similar rating. In a bottom-up process, we apply credit risk parameters based on differentiation between the underlying risks (e.g. probabilities of default by internal rating class and collateral recovery rates by collateral types) to the position data of the loan portfolio. We calculate probabilities of default using empiric historical data of Dresdner Bank's loan portfolio, which serves as the basis for predicting future default rates within our rating categories. We derive the expected loss from Dresdner Bank's historical experience of the amount of the balance of a claim that is not likely to be recovered based on the balance of the claim when the loan became impaired. The result is an economic measure of 147 the expected credit losses of each individual loan, representing a probability-weighted amount of credit loss in the event of a default over the measurement horizon. These amounts are aggregated to the total portfolio level. Through a revolving analysis of actual credit losses, we update the underlying credit risk parameters of our credit risk models in order to improve the quality and reliability of our credit risk measures. Second, we adjust the expected credit loss estimate, which reflects all future credit losses regardless of the accounting period in which they are expected to occur, to reflect only those credit losses that can be attributed to the current accounting period as having already occurred, but as not yet having been identified as of the most recent balance sheet date. These adjustments are performed on the basis of loss emergence periods, which measure the average time lag between the economic loss event and accounting recognition of the loss under IAS 39 or SFAS 114. We generally use default horizons of between six and eight months from the balance sheet date, depending on the portfolio. The resulting amount is used as the basis for determining the general loan loss allowance. Third, since expected loss estimates are dependent on historical information, which may not be representative of current circumstances, the general loan loss allowance may be reviewed by Dresdner Bank senior management. If we believe that certain current factors such as internal lending practices or the state of the broader credit cycle are not adequately reflected in the historical credit risk parameters used to establish the general loan loss allowance, we perform an additional qualitative analysis of the allowance. Modifications of the allowance may then be proposed to Dresdner Bank's management board. Factors for which such modifications of the general loan loss allowance may be made include: - Levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; - Levels in and trends in recoveries of prior charge offs; - Trends in volume and terms of loans; - Effects of changes in lending policies and procedures; - Experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; - National and local trends and conditions; and - Credit concentrations. COUNTRY RISK ALLOWANCE Country risk allowances are established for transfer risk. Transfer risk is a measure of the likely ability of a borrower in a certain country to repay its foreign currency-denominated debt in light of the economic or political situation prevailing in that country. We establish a country risk allowance for loan exposures if serious doubts exist regarding a counterparty's ability to comply with the repayment terms due to the economic or political situation prevailing in the country of the domicile of the counterparty. We believe that this risk represents an additional risk above and beyond the normal counterparty risk. Country risk allowances are based on our country rating system that incorporates current and historical economic, political and other data to categorize countries by risk profile. Using this system, we define country risk ratings from 1 to 8. Country risk allowances are established only for loans to borrowers in countries that are classified in country risk rating categories 6, 7 and 8. We exclude certain loans from this assessment, including loans made in local currency, certain short-term trade financing loans and loans that are collateralized by assets in, or guaranteed by a party in, an economically and politically stable country. In order to avoid layering or double counting of both specific loan loss allowances and country risk allowances, loans that 148 have been deemed impaired under IAS 39 or SFAS 114 are excluded from the portfolio used to establish the country risk allowance. SELF-CORRECTING MECHANISMS The principal self-correcting mechanism used to reduce the difference between estimated and actual observed losses is our practice of basing loss estimates on our historical loss experience. Where actual observed losses differ from estimated losses, information relating to the actual observed losses is incorporated into the historical statistical data on which we base our estimates and is accordingly reflected in our subsequent estimated losses. Similarly, the credit default models that we use in calculating the general loan loss allowance are updated to incorporate newly available statistical evidence on impairment into the default calculations. In addition, Dresdner Bank reviews its loss estimates on a quarterly basis, and, where such estimates differ from actual observed losses, makes appropriate adjustment to the general loan loss allowance and/or the country risk allowance. MOVEMENTS IN LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCE The primary change in the concentration, quality and terms of our loan portfolio in 2002 was the deconsolidation in August 2002 of our former mortgage banking subsidiary Deutsche Hyp. Primarily as a result of the deconsolidation, our total loan portfolio decreased by E54,269 million, or 28.8%, to E134,138 million at December 31, 2002 from E188,407 million at December 31, 2001. Substantially all of the decrease related to commercial mortgage loans held by German borrowers. Such loans typically are longer term than other loans in our portfolio, with the result that the deconsolidation slightly reduced our portfolio's overall maturity profile. This change was reflected directly in both the specific loan loss allowance and the general loan loss allowance, which were reduced by E923 million and E62 million, respectively, as a result of the deconsolidation, as well as indirectly in the general loan loss allowance, to the extent that loans attributable to Deutsche Hyp were no longer included in the portfolio used to calculate the general loan loss allowance following the deconsolidation. In addition, we significantly decreased exposures to corporate borrowers in the course of 2002, particularly in the United States and Asia, as part of our strategic plan to reduce our non-core lending activities outside of Europe. The reduction in exposures to corporate borrowers was more than offset by the deterioration in the credit quality of existing borrowers, however, reflecting the weakness in the current global economic climate. On a comparable basis, excluding loans attributable to Deutsche Hyp, our non-performing loans increased by E1,276 million, or 12.3%, and potential problem loans increased E231 million, or 10.5%, from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002. We did not introduce significant changes in the terms of our loan underwriting in 2002, nor did we introduce significant changes in our estimation methods and assumptions. Beginning in late 2001 and over the course of 2002, Dresdner Bank implemented a revised and improved loan rating system to reflect 16 categories of loan rating rather than merely eight, and to reflect more accurately qualitative as well as quantitative information relating to loans. The new loan grading system did not significantly affect our loan loss allowances at December 31, 2002. During 2002, there were no reallocations of the allowance among the different parts of the loan portfolio or different elements of the allowance. As discussed above, when we establish a specific loan loss allowance in relation to a particular loan, that loan is removed from the portfolio of loans that is used as a basis for calculating the general loan loss allowance and the country risk allowance. The establishment of a specific loan loss allowance may therefore result indirectly in a decrease in the general loan loss allowance and the country risk allowance, but no direct reallocation of allowances occurs. 149 In 2002, we established significant specific loan loss allowances of E288 million in relation to E729 million of loans to borrowers in Argentina. Such loans were subsequently excluded from the portfolio of loans used to calculate the general loan loss allowance and the country risk allowance. The resulting indirect decrease in the country risk allowance was offset in part, however, by increased country risk provisions of E70 million relating to exposures in Brazil. In general, the comparatively high level of net loan loss provisions of E2,222 million in 2002, together with the decrease in the overall size of the loan portfolio attributable to the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp and the reduction in non-core lending outside Europe, resulted in a lower projected level of general loan loss allowances than in previous years. In light of global economic and geopolitical conditions, however, we determined not to reduce our general loan loss allowance to reflect such projections. Our general loan loss allowance was E747 million at December 31, 2002, compared to E753 million at December 31, 2001. We believe the level of our total loan loss allowance is adequate in comparison to our historical net loss experience. The average credit rating of loans in our portfolio based on our internal rating system has remained largely constant in recent years, while at the same time our total loan loss allowance as a percentage of total loans has increased to 5.2% at December 31, 2002, compared to 4.5% at December 31, 2001, excluding loans and allowances for loan losses attributable to Deutsche Hyp, and 3.7% at December 31, 2000. The following table sets forth an analysis of the specific loan loss allowances by industry sector and geographic category of the borrowers, and the percentage of our total loan portfolio accounted for by those industry and geographic categories, on the dates specified. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the borrower. AT DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry..... 884 7.2% 884 5.7% 687 6.0% 840 5.9% 738 7.5% Construction............... 301 0.9% 353 1.0% 381 1.1% 389 1.2% 372 2.0% Wholesale and retail trade.................... 426 4.5% 448 3.8% 506 3.9% 585 4.0% 557 6.0% Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies...... 171 2.1% 133 2.6% 135 2.2% 110 0.5% 126 2.5% Banks...................... 7 0.5% 5 0.3% 1 0.3% -- 1.3% -- 0.4% Service providers.......... 827 10.3% 982 12.2% 1,030 11.1% 887 12.6% 654 9.1% Other...................... 108 2.2% 59 2.1% 95 1.6% 130 2.4% 97 1.8% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Corporate total............ 2,724 27.7% 2,864 27.7% 2,835 26.2% 2,941 27.9% 2,544 29.3% Public authorities......... -- 0.2% -- 0.4% -- 0.3% 1 0.1% 2 0.7% Private individuals (including self-employed professionals)........... 1,702 32.1% 2,090 33.8% 1,730 34.4% 1,342 34.6% 1,170 36.3% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- German total............... 4,426 60.0% 4,954 61.9% 4,565 60.9% 4,284 62.6% 3,716 66.3% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 150 AT DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) NON-GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry, construction, wholesale and retail trade and service providers........ 659 16.3% 1,201 20.4% 998 22.9% 1,183 20.9% 1,001 14.8% Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies...... 33 4.7% 96 5.5% 109 5.3% 107 4.3% 17 4.4% Banks...................... 244 2.5% 118 2.7% 92 3.3% 142 3.5% 195 5.3% Other...................... 321 6.8% 247 2.1% 118 1.8% 85 1.8% 98 2.7% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Corporate total............ 1,257 30.3% 1,662 30.7% 1,317 33.3% 1,517 30.5% 1,311 27.2% Public authorities......... 14 1.5% 15 1.8% 14 0.5% 30 1.6% 15 0.7% Private individuals (including self-employed professionals)........... 182 8.2% 211 5.6% 224 5.3% 231 5.3% 216 5.8% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Non-German total........... 1,453 40.0% 1,888 38.1% 1,555 39.1% 1,778 37.4% 1,542 33.7% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL SPECIFIC LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCES................... 5,879 100.0% 6,842 100.0% 6,120 100.0% 6,062 100.0% 5,258 100.0% COUNTRY RISK ALLOWANCES....... 340 443 480 659 529 GENERAL LOSS ALLOWANCES....... 747 753 523 386 344 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL LOAN LOSS ALLOWANCES.... 6,966 8,038 7,123 7,107 6,131 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== 151 The following table sets forth the movements in the loan loss allowance according to the industry sector and geographic category of the borrower. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the domicile of the borrower. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) TOTAL ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN LOSSES AT BEGINNING OF THE YEAR................................................. 8,038 7,123 7,107 6,131 4,955 GROSS CHARGE-OFFS: GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry............................ 314 66 211 71 47 Construction...................................... 138 16 53 33 11 Wholesale and retail trade........................ 206 54 163 71 26 Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies............................. 74 17 19 4 1 Banks............................................. 11 -- -- -- -- Service providers................................. 327 103 131 82 78 Other............................................. 117 16 36 5 5 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Corporate total................................... 1,187 272 613 266 168 Public authorities................................ -- -- 1 -- -- Private individuals (including self-employed professionals).................................. 348 211 337 173 115 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- German total........................................... 1,535 483 951 439 283 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- NON-GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry, construction, wholesale and retail trade and service providers.......... 270 516 594 93 116 Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies............................. 12 23 48 6 5 Banks............................................. 6 13 14 19 3 Other............................................. 28 2 72 1 4 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Corporate total................................... 316 554 728 119 128 Private individuals (including self-employed professionals).................................. 38 49 32 9 11 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Non-German total....................................... 354 603 760 128 139 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL GROSS CHARGE-OFFS................................ 1,889 1,086 1,711 567 422 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 152 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- (E IN MILLIONS) RECOVERIES: GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry............................ -- 1 9 1 1 Construction...................................... -- -- -- 1 -- Wholesale and retail trade........................ -- -- -- 1 -- Service providers................................. -- -- -- 10 1 Other............................................. 1 -- -- -- 1 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Corporate total................................... 1 1 9 13 3 Private individual (including self-employed professionals).................................. 28 25 21 17 17 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- German total........................................... 29 26 30 30 20 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- NON-GERMAN: Corporate: Manufacturing industry, construction, wholesale and retail trade and service providers.......... 57 3 1 1 3 Financial institutions (excluding banks) and insurance companies............................. 1 7 -- -- -- Banks............................................. -- 4 1 -- -- Other............................................. 32 2 1 -- 37 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Corporate total................................... 90 16 3 1 40 Public authorities................................ -- -- 1 -- -- Private individuals (including self-employed professionals).................................. 56 6 2 5 6 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Non-German total....................................... 146 22 6 6 46 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL RECOVERIES....................................... 175 48 36 36 66 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- NET CHARGE-OFFS........................................ 1,714 1,038 1,675 531 356 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- Additions to allowances charged to operations.......... 1,902 1,901 1,595 1,237 1,024 (Decreases)/Increases in allowances due to (dispositions)/acquisitions of group companies and other increases/(decreases).......................... (1,085) 12 41 158 555 Foreign exchange translation adjustments............... (175) 40 55 112 (47) ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- TOTAL ALLOWANCES FOR LOAN LOSSES AT END OF THE YEAR.... 6,966 8,038 7,123 7,107 6,131 ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== RATIO OF NET CHARGE-OFFS DURING THE YEAR TOAVERAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING DURING THE YEAR.................... 0.93% 0.46% 0.78% 0.27% 0.15% When we determine that a loan is uncollectible, the loan is charged off against any existing specific loss allowance or directly recognized as expense in the income statement. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are recognized in the income statement as a credit to the net loan loss provisions. Since 2000, we have charged off loans when, based on management's judgment, all economically sensible means of recovery have been exhausted. Our determination considers information such as the age of specific loss allowances and expected proceeds from liquidation of collateral and other repayment sources. Prior to 2000, we charged off loans only when all legal means of recovery had been exhausted, for example only after completion of bankruptcy 153 proceedings. The change in practice has affected both the timing and amount of charge-offs in the years 2000-2002, and in 2002 also affected the level of our non-accrual loans. See "-- Risk Elements -- Non-performing Loans." DEPOSITS The following table sets forth the average balances and the average interest rates on deposit categories in excess of ten percent of average total deposits of our banking operations. The allocation between German and non-German components is based on the location of the office that recorded the transaction. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE BALANCE RATE BALANCE RATE BALANCE RATE ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) IN GERMAN OFFICES: Non-interest-bearing demand deposits(1)....................... 16,603 14,364 10,193 Interest-bearing demand deposits..... 45,697 2.6% 31,608 1.5% 33,849 2.1% Savings deposits..................... 6,495 2.8% 10,352 3.4% 14,457 2.6% Time deposits(1)..................... 77,985 3.2% 116,239 4.0% 83,367 3.6% ------- ------- ------- German total......................... 146,780 172,563 141,866 ------- ------- ------- IN NON-GERMAN OFFICES: Non-interest-bearing demand deposits.......................... 2,443 6,098 8,405 Interest-bearing demand deposits..... 16,327 2.3% 11,351 3.8% 10,392 4.2% Savings deposits..................... 1,370 3.4% 1,073 3.9% 612 3.1% Time deposits........................ 41,277 4.2% 57,432 5.3% 44,358 7.5% ------- ------- ------- Non-German total....................... 61,417 75,954 63,767 ------- ------- ------- TOTAL DEPOSITS......................... 208,197 248,517 205,633 ======= ======= ======= --------------- (1) Certain amounts in 2001 and 2000 have been reclassified from time deposits to non-interest-bearing deposits to conform to the current-year presentation. The aggregate amount of deposits by foreign depositors in our German offices was E51,688 million E63,663 million and E55,263 million at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. 154 TIME DEPOSITS The following table sets forth the balance of time certificates of deposit and other time deposits in the amount of E100,000 or more issued by our German offices by time remaining to maturity at December 31, 2002. AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 TIME DEPOSITS OF E100,000 OR MORE -------------------- (E IN MILLIONS) Maturing in three months or less............................ 56,390 Maturing in over three months through six months............ 2,385 Maturing in over six months through twelve months........... 5,770 Maturing in over twelve months.............................. 3,028 ------ Total....................................................... 67,573 ====== The amount of time deposits of E100,000 or more issued by our non-German offices was E25,840 million at December 31, 2002. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS Short-term borrowings are borrowings with an original maturity of one year or less. Short-term borrowings are included within liabilities to customers, liabilities to banks and certificated liabilities. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and negotiable certificates of deposit are the only significant categories of short-term borrowings of our banking operations. The following table sets forth certain information relating to the categories of our short-term borrowings. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------ ---------- --------- (E IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT %) SECURITIES SOLD UNDER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS: Balance at the end of the year.......................... 63,287 56,354 60,648 Monthly average balance outstanding during the year..... 67,168 76,875 54,102 Maximum balance outstanding at any period end during the year................................................. 91,929 102,587(1) 68,950(1) Weighted average interest rate during the year.......... 3.2% 4.3% 4.7% Weighted average interest rate on balance at the end of the year............................................. 2.6% 2.4% 4.7% NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: Balance at the end of the year.......................... 30,765 30,268 28,552 Monthly average balance outstanding during the year..... 31,632 28,718 28,009 Maximum balance outstanding at any period end during the year................................................. 35,467 30,518(2) 28,552(2) Weighted average interest rate during the year.......... 2.8% 5.0% 5.7% Weighted average interest rate on balance at the end of the year............................................. 2.6% 3.1% 6.4% --------------- (1) During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the maximum balance outstanding at any period-end during the year was derived from the maximum balance outstanding at any month-end, based on the unconsolidated balances of Dresdner Bank AG, its branch operations and significant subsidiaries, and certain other banking subsidiaries of Allianz. 155 (2) During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the maximum balance outstanding at any period-end during the year was derived from the maximum balance outstanding at any quarter-end, based on the consolidated balances of our banking operations. REGULATION AND SUPERVISION GENERAL Our insurance, banking and asset management businesses are subject to detailed, comprehensive regulation and supervision in all the countries in which we do business. In addition, certain EU regulations and directives implemented through local legislation in EU member states, have had and will continue to have a significant impact on the regulation of the insurance, banking and asset management industries in EU member states, including those in which many of our most important flagship operations are located, such as Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom. The following discussion addresses significant aspects of the regulatory schemes in these countries. ALLIANZ AG Allianz AG operates as a reinsurer and holding company for our insurance, banking and asset management operating entities and, as such, is supervised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (the Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, or BaFin). The BaFin was established on May 1, 2002. The creation of the BaFin consolidates the functions of the former offices for banking supervision (the Bundesaufsichtsamt fur das Kreditwesen), insurance supervision (the Bundesaufsichtsamt fur das Versicherungswesen) and securities supervision (the Bundesaufsichtsamt fur den Wertpapierhandel) into a single federal regulatory authority. The BaFin monitors and enforces regulatory standards for banks, financial services institutions and insurance companies by supervising their activities in the financial markets and performing functions relating to consumer protection. The BaFin is a federal institution governed by public law that belongs to the portfolio of the German Federal Ministry of Finance. Allianz AG is not required to be licensed as a reinsurance company in Germany. In July 2002, the German Insurance Supervision Act (Versicherungsaufsichtsgesetz), which used to provide only for indirect supervision of reinsurance companies, was amended to extend the BaFin's right to direct supervision. The BaFin is entitled to monitor whether the management of a reinsurance company is of good repute and meets certain standards of professional competence as well as whether the holders of qualified participating interests in the reinsurance company are of good repute. Previously, the BaFin already had the power to give orders to request information. With the amendment in July 2002, the BaFin's power has been significantly expanded. The BaFin is explicitly entitled to take administrative action to ensure that a reinsurance company operates in compliance with applicable laws and that it is able to meet its reinsurance liabilities. Beginning January 1, 2005, additional restrictions will apply to investments held to cover reinsurance reserves. Reinsurance activities continue to be regulated indirectly through the supervision of reinsurance programs submitted by direct insurers. The BaFin also reviews transactions between the Allianz AG and its subsidiaries, including reinsurance relationships and cost sharing agreements. In addition, the Allianz AG is subject to regulation as a reinsurance company and is required to submit internal annual reports, including certain accounting documents, and internal quarterly reports regarding its investments to the BaFin. 156 GROUP REGULATIONS Under German law based on an EU directive on supplementary supervision of insurance groups, insurance companies that are members of an insurance group as defined by law are subject to additional regulatory requirements. The additional regulation includes the following three components: (i) the supervision of intra-group transactions, (ii) the monitoring of the adjusted solvency, i.e. on a consolidated basis, and (iii) the establishment of appropriate internal controls for providing the BaFin with information as part of its monitoring of the first two components. The most important intra-group transactions must be reported to the BaFin annually; intra-group transactions endangering the solvency of an insurance company subject to supervision must be reported immediately. The law requires that the insurance group calculate the capital needed to meet the respective solvency requirements for the insurance group on a consolidated basis. IFRS accounting may be used as a basis for the calculation. Similar group solvency requirements are required to be fulfilled by the local parent companies of insurance subsidiary groups in the different EU jurisdictions. Regarding the banking sector, the credit institutions directive of 2000, consolidating certain older directives, and the capital adequacy directive of 1993 also provide for capital requirements on a consolidated basis. They define, among other things, the capital requirements needed to ensure sufficient capital to cover, also on a consolidated basis, the bank's market and credit risks associated with banking and trading book activities. The directives have been implemented into German law. With respect to the Allianz Group, Dresdner Bank is responsible for the capital requirements of the companies within our banking sector. FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATES In December 2002, the EU adopted a directive that provides for assessment of the capital requirements of a financial conglomerate on the group level, supervision of risk concentration and intra-group transactions and prevention of double-leveraging of the capital of the holding or parent company, i.e. once in the holding or parent company and a second time in the subsidiary ("double gearing"). The Allianz Group is a financial conglomerate within the scope of this directive. The EU member states are required to implement this directive into national law for the fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2005. In the United States, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 substantially eliminates barriers separating the banking, insurance and securities industries in the United States. The legislation allows the formation of diversified financial services firms that can provide a broad array of financial products and services to their customers. In addition, the legislation permits insurers and other financial services companies to acquire banks. INSURANCE EUROPEAN UNION Under the Treaty of Rome of 1957, Germany and the other EU member states are required to implement EU legislation into domestic law and to take EU legislation into account in applying domestic law. EU legislation can take several forms. If legislation takes the form of a EU regulation, the regulation is directly applicable as binding law in all member states. If legislation takes the form of a EU directive, the directive creates an obligation for the member states to implement and transpose the directive into their national legal systems. In addition, certain directives include "self-executing" features that are directly binding on member states, although the directives still require formal implementation into national legislation. 157 Since 1973, the EU has adopted a series of insurance directives on life insurance and direct insurance other than life insurance. These directives have been implemented in Germany, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Austria and the other EU jurisdictions through national legislation and have resulted in significant deregulation of the EU insurance markets. The directives are based on the general principles of freedom of branch operations, freedom of provision of services and home country control. Under the directives, the regulation of insurance companies, including insurance operations outside their respective home countries (whether direct or through branches), is the responsibility of the home country insurance regulatory authority. In particular, the home country insurance regulatory authority is responsible for monitoring compliance with applicable regulations, the solvency and actuarial reserves of insurers and the assets supporting those reserves. As a result of the home country control principle, the EU insurance directives generally permit an insurance company licensed in any jurisdiction of the EU to conduct insurance activities, directly or through branches, in all other jurisdictions of the EU, without being subject to additional licensing requirements. Under the EU insurance directives, there is no authorization procedure to regulate insurance terms and conditions or tariffs. Insurers are required to submit reports to the regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside their home country regarding the management, qualifying shareholders, and other matters such as general and specific policy terms and conditions, premiums and technical reserves. Insurance selling activities are generally regulated by the regulatory authorities in the country in which the sale of the insurance product takes place. In December 2002 a new EU directive on insurance mediation became effective. Under this directive, insurance and reinsurance intermediaries, including ancillary intermediaries, are required to register in their home member state and to possess appropriate knowledge and ability, as determined by their home member state. Member states are required to implement this directive effective January 15, 2005. The impact of the new directive on Allianz Group companies in EU member states depends on how the directive will be implemented by the member states. Consequently, we cannot assess the potential impact of the directive. The EU insurance directives generally prohibit an insurance company from conducting both non-life and life insurance activities. However, life insurance companies that conducted non-life insurance activities in EU member states prior to March 15, 1979, including some of our subsidiaries, may continue to conduct these activities without restriction. In addition, member states may permit life insurance companies to write personal accident and health insurance policies, or insurance companies authorized to write personal accident and health insurance policies to write life insurance policies. GERMANY GENERAL German insurance companies, including the companies in our German Property-Casualty Group, our credit insurance companies, our life insurance companies and our health insurance companies, are subject to a comprehensive system of regulation under the German Insurance Supervision Act. The BaFin monitors and enforces compliance with German insurance laws, applicable accounting standards, technical administrative regulations, and investment and solvency provisions. Any change in the articles of association (except changes regarding capital increases) and all material changes in the business plan of a German insurance company must be approved, and the books and records of German insurance companies are subject to examination at any time, by the BaFin. Under the Insurance Supervision Act, German insurance companies are subject to detailed requirements with respect to the administration of their assets and liabilities. In general, the actuarial and claims reserves of each insurer must be adequate to allow the insurer to fulfill its 158 contractual commitments to pay upon receipt of claims. Toward this end, insurers must maintain a solvency margin (own funds) equal to the minimum solvency margin. One third of the minimum solvency margin constitutes the guarantee fund. If the solvency margin falls below the minimum solvency margin, the BaFin may request that the company submits a plan for restoring its sound financial position; under exceptional circumstances, the BaFin may restrict or prohibit the free disposal of the assets. If the solvency margin of an insurance company falls below the guarantee fund, at the request of the BaFin, the insurance company must submit a plan detailing how the company will promptly obtain the necessary solvency margin; in this case, the BaFin may with no further requirements limit or prohibit the disposal of the insurer's assets. German property-casualty insurance companies are also required to establish claims equalization reserves according to established actuarial rules. These claims equalization reserves are intended to level out fluctuating claims requirements over the course of time. German regulation law requires that insurers maintain assets equal to the sum of technical reserves, regarding life insurers including mathematical provisions, and of liabilities and deferrals under insurance contracts (gebundenes Vermogen) and that they invest these assets in accordance with certain standards. German law limits the proportion of the assets which German insurers may invest in certain categories of investments and imposes restrictions with respect to particular investments. A regulation issued by the German Federal Government provides for detailed investment rules. New insurance products and policies may be offered in Germany without prior approval of the BaFin. Insurers must file a description of new products and policies, and the BaFin may require the modification of terms and conditions or the withdrawal from the market or modification of any contract that does not comply with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, the terms of all health insurance policies are subject to particular consumer protection and other legislation. LIFE INSURANCE Under German law, German life insurance companies are required, after receiving the authorization to conduct a life insurance business, to notify the BaFin of the principles they use to set premium rates and establish actuarial provisions, and of any intention to alter or amend these principles. German life insurance companies are also required to appoint a chief actuary responsible for reviewing and ensuring the appropriateness of actuarial calculation methods. Prior to the appointment, the insurer must provide the BaFin with the name of the actuary. Before and after the appointment, the BaFin is entitled to request that the insurer appoint another actuary if the BaFin has doubts as to the professional qualifications of the appointed actuary. In case the second appointee does not meet the professional requirements, or the insurer does not appoint another actuary, the BaFin itself may appoint an appropriate actuary. Additional restrictions apply to the investment of German life insurance company assets. The BaFin closely monitors the calculation of actuarial reserves and the allocation of assets covering actuarial reserves. Assets covering actuarial reserves are also monitored by an independent trustee. The rules governing the appointment of the trustee are similar to those governing the appointment of the actuary. The BaFin may issue supplemental instructions to an insurer if deemed necessary to safeguard the interests of policyholders. Amounts payable to policyholders at the maturity of endowment policies underwritten by German life insurance companies include a "guaranteed benefit" an amount that, in practice, is equal to a legally mandated maximum rate of return on actuarial reserves. This rate is currently 3.25% per year for policies issued on or after July 1, 2000 and with euro as applicable currency. For policies issued through June 30, 2000, the maximum rate of return is 4.0% per annum. For policies issued prior to 1995, the maximum rate is 3.5% or 3.0%, depending on the generation of tariff. On policies written through 1994, German life insurance companies are obliged by regulations to allocate for the benefit of policyholders at least 90% of their annual surplus. In 1994 and 1996, the laws and the regulations, respectively, were modified, and on policies written 159 since June 30, 1994 and thereafter, German life insurance companies are obliged by the modified regulations to allocate for the benefit of policyholders at least 90% of their net interest yield on assets corresponding to technical reserves. In addition, holders of policies written after June 30, 1994 are entitled to participate in "appropriate amounts" of profit from sources other than assets, mainly from earnings related to risk management and cost management. The amount required to be allocated to policyholders may be used to directly increase a policyholder's profit participation or to contribute to the policyholder's profit reserve. In general, the amount contributed to the policyholder's profit reserve may be used only for the policyholder's profit participation. In the event of an overall loss and to avoid an emergency situation, the insurer may use parts of the policyholder profit reserve to cover the loss with the approval of the BaFin if doing so is in the interest of the policyholders. The profit reserve is accordingly included in the calculation of the life insurer's solvency margin. The respective determinations and calculations are based on German statutory accounting principles. These statutory accounting principles were amended on March 26, 2002, with respect to impairment charges for equity, investment funds and other fixed-interest rate and non-fixed-interest rate securities. This amendment has a stabilizing effect on statutory profits and profit participation. The Retirement Savings Act (Altersvermogensgesetz), which is intended to reform the pension system in Germany, took effect on January 1, 2002. This act provides for state subsidies, in the form of either direct subsidies or, under certain circumstances, tax benefits. The prerequisite for state subsidies is that the underlying products contain certain characteristics entitled to certification by the BaFin. The main characteristic is that at least the amount that has been paid in premiums is available at maturity and that life-long benefit payments be guaranteed. Administration costs of the certified products may be high due to the complex state subsidy process. The Retirement Savings Act also intends to foster company old-age provision. As of January 1, 2002, employees are entitled by law to request that parts of their compensation be converted into company old-age provision. In addition to the already existing pension schemes, (Pensionskassen) the new law and the regulations promulgated thereunder permit the establishment of pension schemes for employees within separate legal entities (Pensionsfonds), as new means of company old-age provision, which are treated as life insurers under the German Insurance Supervisory Act. Both Pensionskassen and Pensionsfonds are supervised by the BaFin. HEALTH INSURANCE We offer "substitutive" health insurance products in Germany designed to partially or totally replace statutory public health insurance coverage. We also offer products intended to supplement both the statutory and substitutive schemes. These products are subject to detailed regulations designed to protect policyholders. In general, the core products of German health insurance companies, including comprehensive health insurance, daily sickness and hospital daily allowance insurance, are regulated by the BaFin. German law also requires that private health insurance companies offer certain kinds of health insurance, including private compulsory long-term care insurance, to policyholders with substitutive health insurance. German health insurance companies are required to appoint and register a chief actuary and an independent trustee with the BaFin. Premiums are calculated in accordance with established actuarial and legal principles and are required to provide an adequate reserve for the increased likelihood of poor health in old age. Health insurance policies may provide for premium increases to cover inflation and the increased costs of medical treatment and other developments. However, any such adjustments must be approved by an independent trustee. Since the beginning of 2000, Allianz Private Health has also been required by law to allocate to its policyholders 90% of interest surplus, which is a component of statutory profits. Like 160 endowment and other life insurance products, health insurance products include mandatory profit-sharing features, whereby Allianz Private Health, like any other German private health insurer, returns 80% of the statutory profit on its health business, after the payment of claims and claims costs, the establishment of reserves, payment of taxes and other expenses, to policyholders annually, generally in the form of premium subsidies or rebates. These serve to limit premium increases for policyholders in higher age brackets. As with the Group's endowment policies in Germany, the actual level of profit sharing the Group provides its policyholders is, for competitive reasons, in excess of the statutory minimum and has been between 85% and 90% of statutory profits in recent years. In January 2003, the specific income threshold for German statutory health insurance coverage was raised by the German legislator in order to stabilize and maintain the statutory health-care system. As a consequence, the number of individuals who are able to choose protection under the private healthcare system may decrease. While this measure may reduce new business for full private health coverage for salaried employees, it may also create new business opportunities for supplementary insurance for individuals insured under statutory health insurance plans. Further changes to the German healthcare system are currently being considered, in particular with a view to reducing its costs. Enactment into law of any such changes may have an impact on private health insurance providers, as the amount of new business written under full private health coverage may further decrease. FRANCE The activities of French insurance companies including AGF are governed by the French Insurance Code and licensed and supervised by the French Ministry of the Economy and the Commission de Controle des Assurances (or Insurance Commission). The Insurance Commission is an independent administrative authority that supervises the financial position and solvency of French insurance companies and their compliance with applicable insurance regulations, including statutory accounting principles and financial and technical management regulations. According to a proposed law concerning financial security, the Insurance Commission shall be replaced by the Commission de Controle des Assurances, des Mutuelles et des Institutions de Prevoyance with the same functions. French insurers are required to make periodic filings of financial, accounting and statistical statements with the Insurance Commission. Any change in the articles of association of French insurance companies must also be approved by the Insurance Commission. The Insurance Commission may examine the accounts of French insurance companies at any time. French insurance companies may not engage on an ongoing basis in any commercial activity other than that of providing insurance coverage and directly related activities. French insurance companies are subject to a number of requirements with respect to the administration of their assets and liabilities. With respect to liabilities, actuarial and claims reserves must be adequate to allow the insurer to fulfill contractual commitments to pay claims upon receipt. French law also prescribes compliance with a minimum solvency margin and requires insurance companies to make contributions to certain state-administered guarantee funds. French insurance companies may invest assets that support actuarial and claims reserves generally only in debt securities, equity securities and shares of mutual funds, real estate, mortgage loans, certain government-guaranteed loans and certain other loans and deposits. French law limits the proportion of assets that French insurers may invest in certain categories of investments and imposes restrictions with respect to particular investments. French life insurers are obligated by law to allocate for the benefit of policyholders (other than holders of contracts supported by separate accounts and term policies) at least 85% of annual investment results on assets attributable to such policyholders, plus at least 90% of other profits. Amounts allocated must be credited to policyholders within eight years but otherwise can be credited at the insurer's discretion. The allocation generally takes the form of an increase in guaranteed benefits but may also take the form of a reduction of future premiums. 161 New insurance products and policies may be offered in France by either a French or foreign insurer without obtaining prior approval. However, the Ministry of the Economy may require submission of contracts or advertising materials relating to the insurance business. The Ministry of the Economy may also require the withdrawal from the market or the modification of any contract or advertising material which, in its judgment, does not comply with applicable laws and regulations. ITALY Italian insurance companies including our major subsidiaries RAS and Lloyd Adriatico are subject to a comprehensive regulatory scheme contained in the Supervision of Insurance Act and supplemented by numerous other regulations and ordinances. These laws and regulations regulate access to insurance activities, require the maintenance of certain solvency margins, in part through a guarantee fund, determine the form of financial statements for insurance concerns and regulate the activities of insurance intermediaries. The activities of Italian insurance companies, insurance agents and brokers are regulated by the Institute for the Supervision of Private and Public Interest Insurance, known by its Italian acronym ISVAP. ISVAP grants authorization to companies to conduct insurance activities. ISVAP is also responsible for the supervision of the financial management of Italian insurance companies. In addition, ISVAP has the authority to propose disciplinary measures, including the revocation of authorizations, which may ultimately be taken by the Ministry of Industry. ISVAP has the power to request information from insurance companies, conduct audits of their activities and question their legal representatives, managing directors and statutory auditors and convene shareholders, directors and statutory auditors meetings in order to propose measures necessary to conform the management of insurance companies to legal requirements. Insurance companies having their registered offices in Italy must receive prior authorization by ISVAP in order to operate life or non-life insurance activities. All Italian insurance companies are required to maintain adequate technical reserves in respect of each insurance contract. ISVAP establishes the maximum interest rate Italian insurance companies may guarantee to the policyholders, for the calculation of required life reserves. Italian law also establishes maximum limits on the amount of reserves that may be invested in any particular category of investments. ISVAP may establish stricter limits under some circumstances. In addition, ISVAP may prohibit companies that do not comply with reserve requirements from disposing of their assets located in Italy and from accepting new business. Italian insurance companies are required to observe a minimum solvency margin calculated in accordance with a formula that varies depending on the types of insurance that they underwrite. In cases where the solvency margin is less than the guarantee fund, ISVAP may require a company to prepare and implement a short-term financing plan in order to bring it into compliance with the applicable requirements, or may prohibit a company from disposing of its assets. In July 2000, the Italian antitrust authority imposed fines totaling E361 million on several insurance companies because of alleged coordination of activities through sharing of information in automobile liability insurance in previous years. Our Italian subsidiaries have been assessed, and have paid, E83 million of this fine. In February 2002, the fine was upheld by the Italian State Council, the highest administrative court in Italy. SWITZERLAND Swiss insurance companies including our Swiss subsidiaries must be licensed by the Swiss Federal Department of Justice and Police and are subject to the supervision of the Swiss Federal Office of Private Insurance. A separate authorization is required for each separate line of 162 insurance business conducted in Switzerland. Although Switzerland is not a member state of the EU and is not subject to the EU insurance directives, Swiss insurance regulation is generally consistent with regulation in the EU. The Federal Office of Private Insurance monitors the compliance of Swiss insurance companies with requirements relating to solvency, minimum capital, reserve building and assets and may conduct audits at any time. The Federal Office of Private Insurance also fixes the interest rate for calculation of required life insurance company reserves. Swiss life and health insurance companies are required to file tariffs and contract conditions with the Federal Office of Private Insurance. UNITED KINGDOM Insurance companies in the United Kingdom are regulated under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (or FSMA). The FSMA provides the framework for the regulation of all business activities within the financial services sector in the United Kingdom, including life insurance and general insurance companies such as our subsidiary Allianz Cornhill. The FSMA took effect on December 1, 2001 and provides that no firm may carry on a regulated activity in the United Kingdom in the insurance, securities, banking or pension sectors, unless it has been authorized to do so under the FSMA or exempted from it. The Financial Services Authority (or FSA) has been created as a single regulator for the insurance, securities, banking and pension sectors in the United Kingdom. The FSA enforces detailed requirements that firms have to meet in order to receive authorization, including requirements relating to minimum capital, internal governance systems and risk control, and the suitability of management and controlling shareholders. A self-regulatory body known as the General Insurance Standards Council (or GISC) has also been established to ensure compliance by general insurance companies with applicable codes of business conduct. The Treasury has announced that the FSA will assume statutory responsibility for the conduct of the sale of general insurance by intermediaries and insurance companies from October 2004. Accordingly, self regulation by the GISC will cease at that time. The FSA also establishes the conditions on which the home country principle is implemented with respect to insurance, securities and banking, granting a European financial services "passport." All insurance companies in the United Kingdom must submit to the FSA annual and, in some cases, quarterly returns together with audited accounts. These returns must include a certificate as to whether domestic assets are sufficient to cover domestic liabilities, and are subject to examination by the FSA. An annual assessment for the protection of UK policyholders is imposed on all insurance companies underwriting life and general business. Policyholder protection exists through two bodies, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (or FSCS) and the Motor Insurance Bureau (or MIB). The FSCS provides policyholders with a level of protection against insurance company insolvency. The protection covers all types of property and casualty insurance. The MIB provides coverage for victims of automobile accidents where there is no (or inadequate) insurance coverage. FSCS and MIB are funded by means of levies on insurance companies. Insurance companies in the United Kingdom may only market products in conformity with classes authorized by the FSA. In some areas, UK regulations establish customer information rights that exceed the disclosure standards mandated by the relevant EU directives. Regulations that came into effect on October 1, 1999 enable policyholders who are consumers to challenge the terms of policies which they claim are unfair or unclear. The Office of Fair Trading and certain consumer groups are empowered to enforce these regulations by requiring revised contracts when the terms of existing contracts appear to contravene the regulations. 163 UNITED STATES Our insurance subsidiaries in the United States are subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation of their activities under U.S. state and federal laws. U.S. property-casualty and life insurance companies are subject to insurance regulation and supervision in the individual states in which they transact business. Supervisory agencies in various states have broad powers to grant or revoke licenses to transact business, regulate trade practices, license agents, approve insurance policy terms and certain premium rates, set standards of solvency and reserve requirements, determine the form and content of required financial reports, examine insurance companies and prescribe the type, concentration, and amount of investments permitted. Insurance companies are subject to a mandatory audit every three to five years by state regulatory authorities, depending on the state of domicile, and every year by independent auditors. U.S. property-casualty and life insurers are also subject to risk based capital (or RBC) guidelines, which provide a method to measure the adjusted capital (statutory capital and surplus plus other adjustments) that insurance companies should have for regulatory purposes, taking into account the risk characteristics of the company's investments and products. The RBC requirements establish capital requirements for four categories of risk: asset risk, insurance risk, interest rate risk and business risk. For each category, the capital requirement is determined by applying factors to various asset, premium and reserve items, with the factors being higher for those items with greater underlying risk and lower for less risky items. An insurance company's RBC ratio will vary over time depending upon many factors, including its earnings, the mix of assets in its investment portfolio, the nature of the products it sells and its rate of sales growth, as well as changes in the RBC formulas required by regulators. The RBC guidelines are intended to be a regulatory tool only, and are not intended as a means to rank insurers generally. Each of our U.S. insurance subsidiaries met its statutory minimum RBC ratios at December 31, 2002. Although the federal government generally does not directly regulate the insurance business, many federal laws affect the insurance business in a variety of ways. In November 2002, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act was signed into law. This legislation requires insurers to offer coverage for terrorist acts in their commercial property and casualty insurance policies and it establishes a federal program to reimburse insurers for a portion of losses so insured. These mandatory rules have implications for Allianz Group companies doing business in the United States. In addition, our U.S. subsidiaries are subject to the restrictions on fund transfers and other activities under the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which, although it affects primarily our banking and investment services subsidiaries, also applies to our insurance subsidiaries. On September 18, 2002, the Treasury Department issued proposed rules regarding Section 352 of the USA PATRIOT Act, requiring financial institutions to establish anti-money laundering programs. In the proposed rules, application of this provision to insurers has been limited to life insurers, annuity issuers and any other insurance product with investment features similar to life insurance. According to an interim rule released by the Treasury Department on October 25, 2002, other insurance and financial services companies are exempted from the requirement to establish anti-money laundering programs until final rules have been issued. The publication of final rules is expected in the first half of 2003. Our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries have implemented programs to comply with applicable Treasury rules. The Treasury Department has postponed the adoption of rules related to the customer identification provision of Section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act. However, all financial institutions are required to scan their customers for potential matches to the list of Specially Designated Nationals issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. There are a number of proposals for regulation which may significantly affect the U.S. market, such as the establishment of an optional federal charter for insurance and reinsurance companies, employee benefit regulations, establishment of a federal registry for 164 asbestos claims subject to compensation limits, and the taxation of insurance companies and their products. These initiatives are mostly in a preliminary stage and, consequently, we cannot assess their potential impact at this time. OTHER COUNTRIES Our insurance operations in countries other than those discussed above are also subject to detailed regulation and supervision by authorities in the relevant jurisdictions, including with respect to such matters as policy forms and rates, reserving, investment and financial practices, and marketing, distribution and sales activities. BANKING, ASSET MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT SERVICES EUROPEAN UNION The supervision of banking, asset management and investment services in the member states of the European Union is the exclusive responsibility of national authorities within the individual member states. However, the rules governing the regulation and supervision of these financial services have been harmonized by a number of EU directives, which have been implemented in the member states. These directives mostly focus on establishing harmonized minimum capital requirements and the freedom to provide services within the member states. As a result of this harmonization, banking licenses granted in one EU member state are recognized in all other member states. Under the EU investment services directive, member states have to ensure that financial institutions that are members of a securities exchange in one member state are eligible for admission to trading on the exchanges of all other member states. Moreover, the investment services directive provides for certain rules of conduct and organizational requirements for financial institutions. Another field of harmonization which is of importance for financial institutions is securities trading. The EU directive on offering prospectuses provides for harmonized rules with respect to the contents and filing of prospectuses for publicly traded securities. Another directive harmonizes the rules for disclosure of financial and other information that publicly traded companies have to provide. The insider trading directive sets forth certain rules for securities trading by corporate insiders. There are also EU directives harmonizing rules governing investment fund management and investor protection. GERMANY Our banking and other financial services activities in Germany are extensively supervised and regulated by the BaFin. BANKING Engaging in the banking business requires the authorization by the BaFin. Banking activities include, among others, deposit and lending activities, safe custody activities, checking account and e-money activities as well as underwriting activities. Enterprises engaged in banking business are formally referred to as credit institutions (Kreditinstitute). All banks in Germany, including Dresdner Bank, are subject to comprehensive governmental supervision and regulation, also on a consolidated basis, by the BaFin in accordance with the German Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz, or the German Banking Act). The BaFin is authorized to issue regulations and guidelines implementing the provisions of the German Banking Act and other laws affecting German banks. The German Banking Act and the regulations issued thereunder have been amended over time to implement the recommendations on banking 165 supervision issued by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision and the relevant European Council Directives. The BaFin supervises the operations of all banks, including Dresdner Bank, to ensure that they conduct their business in accordance with the provisions of the German Banking Act and other applicable German laws and regulations. To this end, the BaFin is empowered to request information and documentation on business matters from the banks. The BaFin may conduct on-site inspections without specific cause. Reports by a bank's auditors have to be submitted to the BaFin and the Deutsche Bundesbank or the Bundesbank, the German central bank. The contents of the reports are prescribed in a special regulation issued by the former Bundesaufsichtsamt fur das Kreditwesen (the Prufungsberichtsverordnung). Particular emphasis is placed on compliance with capital adequacy and liquidity requirements, lending limits and restrictions on certain activities imposed by the German Banking Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. REGULATION BY THE BUNDESBANK The BaFin carries out its banking supervision role in close cooperation with the Deutsche Bundesbank. Although the authority to issue administrative orders that are binding on specific banks is vested solely with the BaFin, the BaFin must consult with the Bundesbank before issuing general regulations and must obtain the consent of the Bundesbank if the regulations affect the Bundesbank. The Bundesbank is responsible for organizing the collection and analysis of the periodic and other reports from the banks. CAPITAL ADEQUACY REQUIREMENTS German banking regulation contains certain capital adequacy requirements. In accordance with what is known as Principle I, each bank's ratio of Liable Capital to risk-weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet items, as such terms are defined or described below, must be at least 8% at the end of each business day in order to cover credit risks. This ratio is known as the Solvency Ratio. Liable Capital of a bank organized as a stock corporation consists principally of (i) paid-in share capital without preferred stock (Vorzugsaktien), (ii) capital reserves, (iii) earnings reserves which are disclosed in the bank's annual balance sheet, (iv) net profits which are shown in audited interim financial statements and which will not be used for distribution or the payment of taxes, (v) the fund for general banking risks pursuant to Section 340g of the German Commercial Code, (vi) capital paid in by silent partners which meets certain conditions set forth in the German Banking Act, including subordination to all other creditors and participation in the bank's losses, (vii) reserves for general banking risks pursuant to Section 340f of the German Commercial Code, provided that such reserves may not exceed 4% of the book value of such receivables and securities, (viii) preferred stock, (ix) capital paid in consideration of profit participation rights (Genussrechtsverbindlichkeiten) which meets certain conditions set forth in the German Banking Act, including subordination to all creditors in the case of insolvency and participation in the bank's losses, (x) long-term subordinated debt with a term of at least five years meeting certain conditions set forth in the German Banking Act, including subordination to all creditors in the case of insolvency, (xi) certain revaluation reserves and (xii) reserves pursuant to Section 6b of the German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz) up to 45%, less certain positions that are required to be deducted. The capital components set forth in items (i) through (vi) above, less balance sheet losses, certain intangible assets (including goodwill) and certain other items, constitute the core capital. Supplementary Capital is the portion of Liable Capital referred to in items (vii) through (xii) above. The distinction between Core Capital and Supplementary Capital reflects the ability of the capital components to cover losses. Core Capital, with the highest ability to cover losses, corresponds to Tier I capital, and Supplementary Capital corresponds to Tier II capital as such terms are used in U.S. capital adequacy rules. The German Banking Act provides that the aggregate amount of Supplementary Capital must not 166 exceed the Core Capital. In addition, the sum of long-term subordinated debt must not exceed 50% of Core Capital. The German Banking Act also requires that certain investments in banks or financial institutions and certain other items, be deducted in computing Liable Capital. To calculate risk-weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet items, the assessment basis must first be determined. With respect to risk assets, the assessment basis is equal to the balance sheet value, adding or deducting certain items. Further, the assets of a bank are assigned to six broad categories of relative credit risk depending on the debtor or on the type of instrument or collateral securing the asset (0%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 70% and 100%), and the assessment basis of each asset is multiplied by the percentage weight applicable to its risk category to arrive at the risk-weighted value to be covered with Liable Capital. With respect to off-balance sheet items, such as financial guarantees and letters of credit, their value, subsequent to the determination of their assessment basis, is adjusted according to their risk classification depending on the type of instrument (20%, 50% and 100%), or, in the case of swaps and other financial derivatives, according to a "mark-to-market" method or an original exposure method. After such adjustment, they are assigned, in the same manner as on-balance sheet assets, to the credit risk categories multiplied by the applicable percentage weight. The German Banking Act also requires market risk and counterparty risk associated with securities transactions, transactions in derivative products and foreign exchange transactions of banks to be covered by adequate capital. The German Banking Act also employs two related concepts: (i) Bank Funds (Eigenmittel) and (ii) market risk positions. Market risk positions are made up of overall foreign exchange positions, commodities positions and the trading book risk positions. For assessing the trading book risk positions, the distinction between trading transactions which are allocated to a bank's trading book (Handelsbuch) and transactions in commercial banking business which are allocated to a bank's investment book (Anlagebuch) is important. Bank Funds consist of Liable Capital plus Tier III Capital. Tier III Capital consists of (i) short-term subordinated debt (with a term of at least two years) that meets certain conditions set forth in the German Banking Act and (ii) the net profits which would be realized if all positions in the trading book were matched, if all anticipated expenses and distributions on capital were deducted and if all losses that would be incurred in the investment book if the bank were liquidated were deducted. The sum of Tier III Capital plus the portion of Supplementary Capital that is not required to cover risk positions in the investment book cannot exceed 250% of the portion of Core Capital that is not required to cover risk positions in the investment book. The trading book of a bank comprises (i) securities, money market instruments, foreign currency or units of account, derivatives and marketable claims and participations that are held by the bank for its own account for resale or trading or that are acquired by the bank with the intent of profiting in the short term from existing or expected differences between buying and selling prices or variations in prices or interest rates; (ii) instruments held and transactions entered into for the purpose of hedging the market risk of the trading book and transactions to refinance such hedging; (iii) transactions subject to the designation of the counterparty (Aufgabegeschafte); (iv) receivables for fees, commissions, interest, dividends and margin payments related to positions in the trading book; and (v) securities lending, loans or similar transactions related to positions in the trading book. Banks must establish guidelines for the inclusion of transactions in their trading books, which must be submitted to the BaFin and the Bundesbank. The investment book of a bank consists of all transactions that are not contained in the trading book. The sum of the risk-weighted values of market risk positions and, under certain circumstances, separately computed option positions, may not exceed the difference between Liable Capital and an amount equal to 8% of the risk-weighted assets increased by the amount of Tier III Capital. This limitation must be computed daily at the close of business. The risk- 167 weighted values of market risk positions and option positions must be computed in accordance with rules set forth in Principle I or, in the case of market risk positions, in accordance with the bank's own risk computation models which have been approved by the BaFin. The positions allocated to the trading book are risk-weighted according to market risk (interest rate and equity security price related) and according to counterparty risk. Capital adequacy rules must not only be met by a bank and its banking subsidiaries on an individual basis, but also by the entire banking group. LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS The German Banking Act and the regulations issued by the BaFin also contain liquidity requirements. Each bank must invest its funds in a manner designed to provide adequate liquidity at all times. Under what is known as Principle II, banks must compute one liquidity factor and three monitoring factors at the end of every calendar month. Each factor is the quotient of available funds to payment obligations for one of four short-term time periods of up to one year. LENDING AND INVESTMENT LIMITS The lending activities of banks are restricted in order to avoid high concentrations of risk. According to the applicable law, lending includes not only bank loans in the ordinary sense but all items on the asset side of the balance sheet, derivative transactions (other than written option positions) and related guarantees and other off-balance sheet positions. A borrower is defined to include a related group of borrowers consisting of certain related natural or legal persons or partnerships of the borrower. There are exemptions, and the limitations on large credits are applied on a risk-weighted basis in a manner similar to the application of the risk-weighted capital adequacy rules. The German Banking Act as it applies to Dresdner Bank as a trading book institution, distinguishes between investment book lending limits, combined investment and trading book lending limits, and trading book lending limits. The limits are as follows: (i) A credit constitutes a "large investment book credit" if the sum of credits allocated to the investment book extended to any one borrower or related group of borrowers, in the aggregate, equals or exceeds 10% of a bank's Liable Capital. The bank has to ensure that, without approval of the BaFin, no single large investment book credit exceeds 25% of the bank's Liable Capital (20% in the case of a bank's unconsolidated affiliate) and that the sum of all of a bank's disbursed large investment book credits does not exceed eight times the bank's Liable Capital. (ii) A credit constitutes a "large combined investment and trading book credit" if the sum of credits allocated to both the investment and trading books extended to any one borrower or related group of borrowers, in the aggregate, equals or exceeds 10% of the bank's Bank Funds. The bank has to ensure that, without approval of the BaFin, no single large combined investment trading book credit exceeds 25% of the bank's Bank Funds (20% in the case of a bank's unconsolidated affiliate) and that the sum of all of a bank's disbursed large combined investment trading book credits does not exceed eight times the bank's Bank Funds. (iii) If a single large combined investment and trading book credit exceeds the respective percentage of the bank's Bank Funds set forth in (ii) above, the sum of credits extended to any one borrower or related group of borrowers that is allocated to the trading book cannot exceed five times that portion of the bank's Bank Funds that is not required to cover risk positions in the investment book, even with approval of the BaFin. 168 (iv) The sum of all portions of single large combined investment and trading book credits that exceed the respective percentage of the bank's Bank Funds set forth in (ii) above for more than 10 days cannot exceed, after deducting the amounts that do not exceed this limit, six times that portion of the bank's Bank Funds that is not required to cover risk positions in the investment book. A bank must report its large credits to the Bundesbank and must notify the BaFin and the Bundesbank if it exceeds the ceilings set forth above. With the approval of the BaFin, a bank may exceed the limits set forth in (i) and (ii). The amount exceeding these ceilings must be covered by Liable Capital and Bank Funds, respectively. The limits set forth in (iii) and (iv) may generally not be exceeded. The excess must be reported, and the excessive amount must be covered by Liable Capital. The amounts of Liable Capital used to cover such excess amount must be disregarded when computing the adequacy of Liable Capital under the capital adequacy rules. If the respective percentage ceilings and the eight times Liable Capital ceiling or Bank Funds ceiling as mentioned in (i) and (ii) are exceeded, only the larger of both excess amounts must be covered by Liable Capital and Bank Funds, respectively. The provisions of the German Banking Act limiting large credits by a bank apply also to the aggregate credits extended by members of a banking group. In order to determine whether members of a banking group in the aggregate have extended a large credit, all credits extended by members of the group to one borrower are consolidated and measured against the consolidated Liable Capital and Bank Funds (including the shares of other shareholders) of the banking group. Consolidation of credits to one borrower or related group of borrowers is only required if the individual total credit position from overall business of at least one member of the banking group to such borrower is equal to or exceeds 5% of such member's Liable Capital. BANK REPORTING REQUIREMENTS In order to enable the BaFin and the Bundesbank to monitor compliance with the German Banking Act and other applicable legal requirements and to obtain information on the financial position of the German banks, the BaFin and the Bundesbank require the routine periodic filing of information. Each bank must file with the BaFin or the Bundesbank, or both, among other things, the following information: (i) immediate notice of certain personnel and organizational changes, the extension or increase of large credits, the acquisition or disposition of 10% or more of the equity or voting rights of another company or certain changes in the amount of such equity investment, and the commencement or termination of certain non-banking activities; (ii) monthly balance sheet and statistical information and annual audited unconsolidated and consolidated financial statements; (iii) the acquisition or disposition of a direct or indirect investment in the bank representing 10% or more of the equity or voting rights of the bank, whether held in the shareholder's own interest or in the interest of a third party, or giving the person making the investment a significant influence over the management of the bank (or Significant Shareholding), or an increase or decrease of a Significant Shareholding which results in the investment reaching or passing the threshold of 20%, 33% or 50% of such voting rights or equity, as well as the fact that the bank became or ceased to be a subsidiary of another enterprise, as soon as the bank has knowledge of such facts; and on an annual basis, the names and addresses of holders of Significant Shareholdings in the bank and its foreign subsidiary banks, and the amount of such investment; (iv) monthly compliance statements with regard to the capital adequacy rules and the requirements on liquidity; and (v) quarterly statements listing the borrowers to whom the reporting bank has outstanding loans of E1.5 million or more and certain information about the amount and the type of the loan, including syndicated loans exceeding this amount even if the reporting bank's share does not reach E1.5 million. 169 If several banks report to the Bundesbank loans of E1.5 million or more to the same borrower or to a group of affiliated borrowers, the Bundesbank must inform the reporting banks of the total reported indebtedness and of the type of such indebtedness and of the number of reporting lending banks. SANCTIONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE If the BaFin discovers irregularities, it has a wide range of enforcement powers. The BaFin can exert a direct influence over the management of a bank. If the Liable Capital of a bank is not adequate or if the liquidity requirements are not met and the bank has failed to remedy the deficiency within a period determined by the BaFin, the BaFin may prohibit or restrict the bank's distribution of profits or extension of credit. These prohibitions also apply to the parent bank of a banking group if the Bank Funds of the bank members of the group do not meet the legal requirements. If a bank is in danger of defaulting on its obligations to creditors, the BaFin may take emergency measures to avert default. In this connection, it may, among other things: (i) issue instructions relating to the management of the bank; (ii) prohibit the acceptance of deposits and the extension of credit; (iii) prohibit or restrict management of the bank from carrying on their functions; and (iv) appoint supervisors. To avoid the insolvency of a bank, the BaFin has the authority to (i) prohibit payments and disposals of assets, (ii) suspend customer services and (iii) prohibit the acceptance of payments other than in payment of debt owed to the bank. Finally, the BaFin may revoke the bank's license. In addition, violations of the German Banking Act may result in criminal and administrative penalties. DEPOSIT PROTECTION In accordance with the German Deposit Guarantee Act (Einlagensicherungs-und Anlegerentschadigungsgesetz), the Bundesverband Deutscher Banken, the association of the German private sector commercial banks, established a company known as the Compensation Institution (Entschadigungseinrichtung deutscher Banken GmbH) to carry out and ensure the deposit guarantee scheme of the German private sector commercial banks. The Deposit Guarantee Act provides that the aggregate deposits of a given depositor at a given bank and claims resulting from securities transactions by a customer with a given bank must each be covered up to 90% of the aggregate amount or E20,000, whichever is less. Certain creditors, as defined by the German Deposit Guarantee Act, including other banks, insurance companies, the public sector and enterprises and persons related to the bank, may not claim compensation. The deposit guarantees will be funded through contributions by the private sector commercial banks to the Compensation Institution. In addition, the banking industry has voluntarily set up various protection funds for the protection of depositors. Most private sector commercial banks, including Dresdner Bank, are members of the Einlagensicherungsfond, a deposit protection association with a fund which covers liabilities to each creditor up to a certain amount. Obligations vis-a-vis other banks and other persons described by the fund's articles of association are not covered. Furthermore, the articles of association provide for certain restrictions not related to specific creditors, but rather to categories of obligations. Payments from the Einlagensicherungsfond generally cover the portion of a deposit not already covered by the Compensation Institution. Members are required to provide certain information to the association and the Prufungsverband deutscher Banken e.V., an institution for the auditing of German banks. This auditing institution conducts its own inspections of banks in order to reduce the risk of failures within the deposit protection system. Furthermore, depositors and other creditors of German banks are protected by the arrangements in relation to Liquiditats-Konsortialbank GmbH (or LIKO), a bank founded in 1974 in order to provide funding for German banks which experience liquidity problems. The shares in 170 LIKO are owned 30% by the Bundesbank, with the rest of the shares being held by other German banks and banking associations. LIKO is funded by its shareholders. For additional information, see Note 43 to our consolidated financial statements. MORTGAGE BANKS Through Dresdner Bank, we hold approximately 28% of the shares of Eurohypo AG, a mortgage bank. In Germany, mortgage banks are regulated by a special statute. the German Mortgage Bank Act (Hypothekenbankgesetz), in addition to the German Banking Act. Under the Mortgage Bank Act, mortgage banks are authorized to finance themselves through the issuance of mortgage bonds (Hypothekenpfandbriefe) and public-debt bonds (Kommunalschuldverschreibungen). These bonds are generally long-term bonds with an original maturity of four years or longer, the principal and interest of which are at all times required to be covered by a pool of specified qualifying assets. Mortgage-backed bonds are backed by mortgage loans extended by the mortgage bank that cover 60% or less of the market value of the respective real estate property, and public-debt backed bonds are backed by communal loans extended by the mortgage bank to German public authorities or entities organized under public law or to member states of the EU or to the contracting states to the agreement on the European Economic Area (or EEA), or which are guaranteed or otherwise secured by such persons. Separate pools are maintained for the mortgage-backed bonds and for the public-debt backed bonds. The total amount of mortgage and public-debt bonds issued by the mortgage bank must be fully covered by mortgages and communal loans in at least the same total amount and with at least the same interest earnings. The qualifying assets remain on the mortgage bank's balance sheet. In case of insolvency proceedings relating to the mortgage bank, the asset pools constituting cover will be exempt from such proceedings. INVESTMENT COMPANIES In Germany, investment funds are managed by investment companies. Investment companies are specialized credit institutions and are subject to the German Investment Companies Act (Gesetz uber Kapitalanlagegesellschaften), in addition to the German Banking Act. Within the Allianz Group, DEUTSCHER INVESTMENT-TRUST Gesellschaft fur Wertpapieranlagen mbH (dit) and dresdnerbank investment management Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH (dbi) are investment companies. An investment fund must be segregated from the investment company's own assets and is not a legal entity; therefore the assets of the investment fund may either be jointly owned by the unit-holders or owned by the investment company as trustee. The German Investment Companies Act provides for specific investment restrictions for different types of investment funds, such as money-market, securities and real estate investment funds, among others. The BaFin supervises the investment company's compliance with the applicable investment restrictions. Investment companies do not fall within the scope of the above-mentioned Principles I and II. Therefore, they are not subject to the capital and liquidity requirements provided for by these principles. FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTIONS Financial Services Institutions are enterprises that provide certain financial services described by the German Banking Act. These financial services include investment and contract brokering, portfolio management and own-account trading with financial instruments for third parties. To engage in the provision of financial services, an authorization by the BaFin is required. The supervision and regulation of financial services institutions is substantially similar to the 171 regulation and supervision of banks. Like investment companies, certain financial services institutions are exempted from the capital and liquidity requirements described by Principles I and II. Within the Allianz Group, Allianz Capital Managers GmbH and Allianz Dresdner Asset Management International GmbH are financial services institutions. UNITED KINGDOM In the United Kingdom, the FSMA also provides the framework for the regulation of activities of the financial services sector outside of the insurance business, with the FSA as the responsible supervisory authority. The FSA also prosecutes offenses involving insider dealing, market manipulation, money laundering and of market abuse. The above requirements of the FSA with respect to the financial services sector apply to most Allianz Group entities in the United Kingdom, including our Dresdner Bank subsidiaries. The London branch of Dresdner Bank is a "passported" bank in the United Kingdom in accordance with the provisions of the EU directives as implemented in UK law. As such it is lead regulated in prudential matters by BaFin in Germany. FRANCE Under French law, investment and investment services companies dealing with financial instruments must be authorized by the Comite des Etablissement de Credit et des Entreprises d'Investissement (Banque de France) and by the Commission des Operations de Bourse if they act under the portfolio management status. They are subject to the supervision of the Conseil des Marches Financiers for the dealing with listed financial instruments and the Commission des Operations de Bourse for their portfolio management activity. Pursuant to the draft law concerning the financial security mentioned above in connection with the insurance business, it is intended to merge the Commission des Operations de Bourse, the Conseil de Discipline de Ia Gestion Financiere and the Conseil des Marches Financiers into the Autorite des Marches Financiers. Banks in France, including our Dresdner Bank subsidiary Dresdner Bank Gestions France, must be authorized by the Comite des Etablissement de Credit et des Entreprises d'Investissement (Banque de France) and are subject to the supervision of the Commission Bancaire (Banque de France). The supervision extends to all the activities of French banks, including their capital adequacy, shareholdings in other companies and limitation of risk. The Paris branch of Dresdner Bank is a "passported" bank in France in accordance with the provisions of EU directives as implemented in French law. As such it is primarily regulated by the BaFin. Banks are required to file monthly reports to the Commission Bancaire. Changes of shareholdings in French banks do need approval by the Comite des Etablissement de Credit et des Entreprises d'Investissement (Banque de France). French securities regulations prescribe a minimum amount of share capital for investment and investment services companies and impose certain requirements on company management and shareholders. The companies must also submit a business plan with their application for authorization. There are also regulatory restrictions with respect to equity capital on limitation of risks, and specific disclosure rules must be observed. In addition, the Conseil des Marches Financiers and the Commission des Operations de Bourse oversee the dealings of investment and investment services companies with investors, including the provision of appropriate information to investors, and supervise control procedures within these companies. The Conseil des Marches Financierssupervises compliance with market rules, and the Commission des Operations de Bourse supervises the fairness of transactions. 172 French supervisory authorities are authorized to impose sanctions, including revocation of operating licenses, on companies that fail to comply with applicable regulations. ITALY Investment and investment services companies in Italy dealing with financial instruments must be licensed and are subject to regulation by both Banca d'Italia, the Italian national bank, and the Commissione Nazionale per le Societa e la Borsa (or CONSOB). Shareholdings in excess of 5% in Italian investment and investment services companies require the authorization of Banca d'Italia. Banks in Italy, including our subsidiary Rasbank S.p.A. and our Dresdner Bank subsidiaries, must be authorized by Banca d'Italia and are subject to the supervision of both Banca d'Italia and CONSOB. The supervision of Banca d'Italia extends to all the activities of Italian banks, including their capital adequacy, shareholdings in other companies and limitation of risk. The Milan branch of Dresdner Bank is a "passported" bank in Italy in accordance with the provisions of EU directives as implemented in Italian law. As such it is lead regulated by the BaFin. The CONSOB supervises the provision of investment services by banks in Italy and rules of conduct to be followed by the banks in their dealings with the public. Banks are required to file their annual and semi-annual reports with both Banca d'Italia and the CONSOB. They also have ongoing disclosure obligations. The Milan branch of Dresdner Bank is exempt from these requirements and instead has to submit the annual financial statements of Dresdner Bank Group to the Camera di Commercio and Banca d'Italia. Changes in organizational structure of the branch have to be reported annually. Major shareholders of banks and investment and investment services companies must be of good standing and the top managers and members of the boards of directors and boards of auditors must meet specific qualifications in terms of professionalism and good standing. With respect to banks, Italian law requires those assuming control of or a shareholding of greater than 5% in an Italian bank to obtain authorization from Banca d'ltalia. Similarly, banks assuming shareholdings in any other company are required to obtain authorization from Banca d'Italia. Italian supervisory authorities are empowered to impose sanctions, including revocation of operating licenses, on companies that fail to comply with relevant regulations. UNITED STATES Allianz of America, Inc., Allianz Dresdner Asset Management of America L.P., Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, Oppenheimer Capital, Nicholas-Applegate, Dresdner RCM Global Investors LLC and other financial services subsidiaries of Allianz AG in the United States are registered as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Many of the investment instruments managed by these financial services subsidiaries, including a variety of mutual funds and other pooled investment vehicles, are registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The investment advisory activities of these financial services subsidiaries are subject to various U.S. federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations relate to, among other things, limitations on the ability of investment advisers to charge performance-based or non-refundable fees to clients, record-keeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on principal transactions between an adviser or its affiliates and advisory clients, as well as general anti-fraud provisions. The failure to comply with these laws or regulations may result in possible sanctions, including the suspension of individual employees, limitations on the activities in which the investment adviser may engage, suspension or revocation of the investment adviser's registration as an adviser, censure and/or fines. Some U.S. financial service subsidiaries of Allianz AG are also registered with the SEC as broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are subject to extensive regulation 173 as such. In addition, some of these subsidiaries are members of, and subject to, regulation by self-regulatory organizations such as the National Association of Securities Dealers and, in the case of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein Securities LLC, the New York Stock Exchange. The scope of broker-dealer regulation covers matters such as capital requirements, the use and safekeeping of customers' funds and securities, advertising and other communications with the public, record-keeping and reporting requirements, supervisory and organizational procedures intended to assure compliance with securities laws and rules of the self-regulatory organizations and to prevent improper trading on material non-public information, employee-related matters, limitations on extensions of credit in securities transactions, and clearance and settlement procedures. A particular focus of the applicable regulations concerns the relationship between broker-dealers and their customers. As a result, in some instances they may be required to make "suitability" determinations as to certain customer transactions. Dresdner Bank provides commercial banking services in the United States through its offices in New York and Los Angeles, as well as the Miami office of its subsidiary Dresdner Bank Lateinamerika AG. Dresdner Bank is accordingly subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board under the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (or BHCA), and the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended (or IBA). The New York branch of Dresdner Bank is licensed, supervised and examined by the New York State Banking Department. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 substantially eliminated barriers separating the banking, insurance and securities industries in the United States. According to this act, a bank holding company that has effectively elected to become a financial holding company may conduct business activities either directly or through its subsidiaries that were previously prohibited for bank holding companies. Dresdner Bank became a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 2000. To qualify as a financial holding company, a bank is required to meet the criteria of being well-managed and well-capitalized. A foreign bank that is well-capitalized has capital ratios equal to or comparable with those required for a well-capitalized U.S. bank, i.e. a Tier I capital ratio of 6% and a total capital to total risk-based assets ratio of 10%. Dresdner Bank is currently in compliance with these capital requirements. In addition, a bank holding company is required to elect to be treated as a financial holding company vis-a-vis the Federal Reserve Board. In the event of non-compliance with these criteria, a financial holding company may be required to limit previously authorized financial activities or, after a certain time period, to terminate authorized banking operations or to divest any commercial lending companies owned or controlled by the financial holding company. As a result of its ownership of Dresdner Bank, Allianz AG is also subject to the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board under the BHCA and the IBA and has applied to be treated as a financial holding company. Allianz AG was granted a two-year transition period during which it was treated as a financial holding company without having been granted such status. In May 2003, this period was extended until May 21, 2004, and it is subject to possible extension for up to two additional years. Under the IBA, the Federal Reserve Board may terminate the activities of any U.S. office of a foreign bank if it determines that the foreign bank is not subject to comprehensive regulation on a consolidated basis in its home country or that there is reasonable cause to believe that the foreign bank or its affiliate has violated U.S. law or engaged in unsafe or unsound banking practice in the United States, and as a result of such violation or practice, the continued operation of the U.S. office would be inconsistent with the public interest or the purposes of federal banking law. Under the trade name Dresdner Kleinwort Capital, subsidiaries of Dresdner Bank are also active in the private equity business. They provide investment management services and make, manage and monitor private equity investments in unaffiliated companies and investment funds, and establish and operate investment funds in which third-party investors make private equity 174 investments. These subsidiaries are subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board and the SEC. Two subsidiaries of Dresdner Bank are also active as small business investment companies and are subject to the U.S. Small Business Administration Act. OTHER COUNTRIES Our financial services businesses in countries other than those discussed above are also subject to detailed regulation and supervision by authorities in the relevant jurisdictions, including with respect to such matters as capital adequacy, investment advisory and securities trading activities, and mutual fund management and distribution activities. ACQUISITION CONTROL MATTERS In a number of jurisdictions, the direct or indirect acquisition of "control" of companies is subject to prior regulatory approval. Under the applicable EU directives, any person acquiring shares in an insurance, bank or investment services company who would become a "qualifying shareholder" as a result of the acquisition is required to give prior notice of the proposed acquisition to the relevant supervisory authorities in the company's home jurisdiction. A qualifying shareholder is a shareholder that holds at least 10% of the voting rights or the capital of such a company or otherwise has the ability to exercise a significant influence over the management of the company. A qualifying shareholder must also report any increases in shareholdings by any holder to levels equal to or exceeding 20%, 33% or 50% of the voting rights or the capital. The supervisory authorities have a maximum period of three months during which to oppose an acquisition of shares if they believe that the acquisition would jeopardize the sound and prudent management of the insurance company. Reductions in ownership below the thresholds indicated above must also be notified to the supervisory authorities. These directives have been implemented in most EU jurisdictions. Under the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz, or the German Securities Trading Act), holders of voting securities of a German company listed on a stock exchange within the European Union or within the other contracting states to the agreement on the EEA must notify the company and the BaFin in writing and without delay (at the latest, within seven calendar days) of the level of their holding whenever that holding reaches, exceeds or falls below 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 75% of the company's shares. Also, a German company receiving this notification of shareholding must generally publish these facts. Effective January 1, 2002, the provisions of the German Securities Trading Act were amended to broaden the criteria for attribution of shares. On January 1, 2002, the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act (Wertpapier-erwerbs- und Ubernahmegesetz, or WpUG) took effect. The WpUG applies to all offers to acquire securities issued by stock corporations and partnerships limited by shares (Kommanditgesellschaften auf Aktien) by shares that are domiciled in Germany and admitted to trading on an organized market in the European Economic Area (or EEA). The WpUG provides that any shareholder obtaining direct or indirect control, which is defined as 30% or more of the voting rights, of a stock corporation or of a partnership limited by shares, is required to make a mandatory takeover offer to all other shareholders of the corporation. The law amending the WpUG also added provisions to the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) relating to the buyout and the compensation of minority shareholders. Upon request of a shareholder holding 95% or more of the share capital of the stock corporation, the shareholders' meeting of the stock corporation can resolve to transfer all shares held by minority shareholders to the controlling shareholder in exchange for appropriate cash compensation. The Allianz AG has made use of these new provisions to acquire the remaining minority shareholdings of Vereinte Versicherungs-AG, Dresdner Bank AG and Hermes Kreditversicherungs AG. 175 Similar regulations relating to acquisition of control have been established in the jurisdiction inside and outside of the EU in which we do business. State insurance holding company statutes in the United States applicable to Allianz AG's U.S. insurance subsidiaries generally provide that no person may acquire control of the Allianz AG, and thus indirect control of its U.S. insurance subsidiaries, without the prior approval of the appropriate insurance regulators. Generally, any person who acquires beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the outstanding ordinary shares or voting power of the Allianz AG (including ADSs) would be presumed to have acquired such control unless the appropriate insurance regulators upon application determine otherwise. ANTITRUST REGULATION AND MERGER REVIEW EU and national antitrust regulation affects the cooperation between insurance companies and within insurance associations. While the EC Treaty generally prohibits arrangements that restrict competition, some types of cooperation in the insurance sector are expressly exempt from this prohibition by EU regulation providing for a so-called block exemption. In February 2003, the EU adopted a new block exemption regulation for the insurance sector to replace the existing regulation on this subject at its expiry on March 31, 2003. In particular with respect to the establishment and management of insurance and reinsurance pools, the new regulation raises the market share thresholds for insurance pools and restricts the simultaneous memberships of insurers who may exercise a determining influence on the commercial policy of pools acting on the same relevant market in these pools. Insurers have in the past been able to seek individual exemption under applicable antitrust laws for insurance pools that were not eligible for block exemption and other restrictions on competition. As of May 1, 2004 this procedure is no longer available. In some business lines, the Allianz Group's market share might raise concerns under European merger control regulations. If the Allianz Group were to consider a substantial acquisition in these business lines, the relevant EU authorities might require divestiture of parts of the portfolio or might disapprove the transaction. Comparable legislation with respect to merger review has been enacted in many jurisdictions inside and outside the EU. RULES OF CONDUCT FOR SECURITIES TRADING The German Securities Trading Act prohibits insider trading with respect to securities admitted to trading or included in the over-the-counter market at a German exchange or the exchange in another EU member state or in other contracting states to the agreement on the EEA. The German Securities Trading Act also requires that the issuer of securities admitted to trading on a German stock exchange promptly publish any new fact relating to the field of the issuer's activities that is not publicly known if this fact could have a material influence on the market price of such securities due to its effects on the financial position or the overall business performance of the issuer. The BaFin carries out supervisory functions with respect to these regulations. The German Securities Trading Act also introduced rules of conduct for banks and securities firms (the Rules of Conduct). The Rules of Conduct apply to all investment services firms in Germany. The BaFin has broad powers to investigate investment services firms with a view to monitoring compliance with the Rules of Conduct. The German Securities Trading Act provides for an annual examination on behalf of the BaFin of a bank's compliance with its obligations under the German Securities Trading Act. 176 ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The corporate bodies of Allianz AG are the management board (Vorstand), the supervisory board (Aufsichtsrat) and the general meeting (Hauptversammlung). The management board and the supervisory board are separate and no individual may serve simultaneously as a member of both boards. The management board is responsible for managing the day-to-day business of Allianz AG in accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) and the articles of association of Allianz AG. The management board is bound by applicable German law, the articles of association of Allianz AG as well as its internal rules of procedure (Geschaftsordnung). The management board represents Allianz AG in its dealings with third parties. The supervisory board oversees the management of Allianz AG. It is also responsible for appointing and removing the members of the management board and representing Allianz AG in connection with transactions between a member of the management board and Allianz AG. The supervisory board may not make management decisions, but the supervisory board or the articles of association must determine that certain types of transactions require the supervisory board's prior consent. In carrying out their duties, the members of the management board and the supervisory board must exercise the standard of care of a diligent and prudent business person. In complying with this standard of care, the members of both boards must take into account a broad range of considerations in their decisions, including the interests of Allianz AG, its shareholders, employees and creditors. The management board is additionally required to respect the rights of shareholders to equal treatment and equal information. Members of either board who violate their duties may be personally liable for damages to Allianz AG. Allianz AG may waive these damages or settle these claims only if at least three years have passed from the date of their origination, and if the general meeting approves the waiver or settlement with a simple majority. No approval of a waiver or settlement by the general meeting will be effective if opposing shareholders who hold, in the aggregate, one-tenth or more of the share capital of Allianz AG have their opposition formally noted in the minutes recorded by a German notary. As a general rule under German law, a shareholder has no direct recourse against the members of the management board or the supervisory board in the event that they are believed to have breached a duty to Allianz AG. The supervisory board has comprehensive monitoring functions. To ensure that these functions are carried out properly, the management board must regularly report to the supervisory board with regard to current business operations and future business planning (including financial, investment and personnel planning). The supervisory board is also entitled to request at any time special reports regarding the affairs of Allianz AG, the legal or business relations of Allianz AG to its subsidiaries and the affairs of any of its subsidiaries to the extent that the affairs of such subsidiary may have a significant impact on Allianz AG. The management board is required to ensure that adequate risk management and internal monitoring systems exist within Allianz AG to detect risks relating to the Group's business activities at the earliest possible stage. Pursuant to the amendment in July 2002 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the management board and the supervisory board are required to declare annually that Allianz AG has complied or will comply with the recommendations set forth in the Corporate Governance Code published by the German Ministry of Justice (Bundesministerium der Justiz). In addition, the management board and the supervisory board are required to disclose any specific recommendation with which they have failed or will fail to comply. The Corporate Governance 177 Code contains provisions for corporate governance with respect to shareholders and general meetings, management board, supervisory board, cooperation between management board and supervisory board, transparency, reporting and audit of the annual financial statements. On December 18, 2002, the management board and supervisory board signed the first compliance declaration, confirming that Allianz AG complies with all recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code. However, the members of Allianz AG's management board reserve the right to exceed the maximum number of board mandates that may be held outside the Group under the Corporate Governance Code, as appropriate, as the acceptance of supervisory board mandates in companies in which Allianz AG has substantial holdings forms an essential part of the duties of members of the management board. MANAGEMENT BOARD The management board of Allianz AG currently consists of eleven members. The number of members of the management board decreased from twelve to eleven as of November 1, 2002. Under the articles of association of Allianz AG, the supervisory board determines the size of the management board, although it must have at least two members. Under the articles of association, Allianz AG may be legally represented by two members of the management board or by one member of the management board and the holder of a general commercial power of attorney (Prokura), which entitles its holders to carry out all legal acts and transactions on behalf of Allianz AG. In addition, pursuant to a filing with the commercial register in Munich, Allianz AG may also be represented by two holders of a general commercial power of attorney. The supervisory board represents Allianz AG in connection with transactions between a member of the management board and Allianz AG. To the extent that a supervisory board committee is entitled to decide on a specific matter in lieu of the supervisory board, the right of representing Allianz AG vis-a-vis the management board in that matter can be transferred to the relevant supervisory board committee. The supervisory board appoints the members of the management board. The initial term of the members of the management board is generally limited to three years. Each member may be reappointed or have his term extended by the supervisory board for one or more terms of up to five years each. The initial appointment or the reappointment of members of the management board attaining the age of 60 is generally limited to terms of one year. Members of the management board must resign from office at the end of the fiscal year in which they attain the age of 65. The supervisory board may remove a member of the management board prior to the expiration of his term for good cause, for example in the case of a serious breach of duty or a bona fide vote of no confidence by the general meeting. A member of the management board may not deal with, or vote on, matters relating to proposals, arrangements or contractual agreements between himself and Allianz AG and may be liable to Allianz AG if he has a material interest in any contractual agreement between Allianz AG and a third party which was not disclosed to, and approved by, the supervisory board. The management board has adopted its own internal rules of procedure. The management board regularly reports to the supervisory board on the business of Allianz AG. According to the internal rules of procedure of the supervisory board, the management board requires the consent of the supervisory board for certain transactions, primarily, share capital measures and acquisitions or divestitures of companies or shareholdings in companies of a significant volume. The current members of the management board, their areas of responsibility, the year in which each member was first appointed, the year in which the term of each member expires, and the principal supervisory or management board memberships outside the Allianz Group, respectively, are as follows: 178 YEAR YEAR CURRENT AREA OF FIRST TERM PRINCIPAL OUTSIDE BOARD NAME RESPONSIBILITY APPOINTED EXPIRES MEMBERSHIPS IN 2002 ---------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ------- ------------------------------- Michael Diekmann.................. Chairman of the 1998 2006 Member of the supervisory management board boards of BASF AG, Linde AG (deputy chairman) and Lufthansa AG Dr. Paul Achleitner............... Group Finance 2000 2004 Member of the supervisory boards of Bayer AG, MAN AG, RWE AG and OTAG Detlev Bremkamp................... Europe II 1991 2004 Member of the supervisory boards of ABB AG (Deutschland) and Hochtief AG Jan R. Carendi.................... Americas 2003 2005 None Dr. Joachim Faber................. Allianz Dresdner 2000 2004 Member of the supervisory Asset Management boards of Bayerische Borse AG, (ADAM) Infineon Technologies AG, and Societa Metallurgica Italiana S.p.A. Dr. Reiner Hagemann............... Europe I 1995 2004 Member of the supervisory boards of E.ON Energie AG, Schering AG and Steag AG Dr. Horst Muller.................. Group Financial 2001 2003 Member of the supervisory Risk Management boards of Buderus AG and BVV Versicherungsverein des Bankgewerbes a. G. Dr. Helmut Perlet................. Group 1997 2004 None Controlling, Accounting, Taxes, Compliance Dr. Gerhard Rupprecht............. Group 1991 2005 Member of the supervisory Information boards of Heidelberger Technology, Life Druckmaschinen AG, Quelle AG Insurance and ThyssenKrupp Automotive AG Germany Dr. Herbert Walter................ Allianz Dresdner 2003 2007 Member of the supervisory board Banking of Deutsche Borse AG Dr. Werner Zedelius............... Growth Markets 2002 2004 Member of the supervisory board of SMS AG The following is a summary of the business experience of the current members of the management board within the Allianz Group: Michael Diekmann: Joined the Allianz Group in 1988. From 1996 to 1998 he was chief executive officer of Allianz Insurance Management Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd., Singapore. He became a deputy member in October 1998 and a full member of the management board of Allianz AG in March 2000. He was appointed chairman of the management board in April 2003. Dr. Paul Achleitner: Joined the management board of Allianz AG in January 2000. He was previously chairman of Goldman, Sachs & Co. oHG, Frankfurt, Germany and a partner of Goldman Sachs Group from 1994 to 1999. Detlev Bremkamp: Joined the Allianz Group in 1963. He was a deputy member of the management board of Allianz Versicherung from 1981 to 1982 and a full member from 1983 to 1987, managing director and general manager of Allianz Europe Ltd. in Amsterdam from 1987 to 1990, and became a member of the management board of Allianz AG in 1991. Jan R. Carendi: Became a member of the Management Board of Allianz AG in May 2003. He previously held a variety of positions at Skandia Insurance Company Ltd. and other 179 companies of the Skandia Group, including chief executive officer of Skandia Insurance Company Ltd. and Skandia New Markets Inc. and chief executive officer of American Skandia Inc. Dr. Joachim Faber: Joined the Allianz Group in 1997 after holding various positions at Citibank AG, Frankfurt, Germany (1984-1992), including chairman of the management board, and Citibank International PLC, London (1992-1997), including head of capital markets. He was a member of the management board of Allianz Versicherung from 1997 to 1999 and became a member of the management board of Allianz AG in January 2000. Dr. Reiner Hagemann: Joined the Allianz Group in 1977. In 1987, he became a deputy member, in 1990 a full member and in 1995 was made chairman of the management board of Allianz Versicherung. He was a member of the management board of Allianz Leben from 1991 through 1994 and became a member of the management board of Allianz AG in 1995. Dr. Horst Muller: Joined Dresdner Bank in 1970. He became a deputy member of the management board of Dresdner Bank in 1992, and a full member in 1994. With the acquisition of Dresdner Bank in July 2001, he became a member of the management board of Allianz AG. Dr. Helmut Perlet: Joined the Allianz Group in 1973. He has been head of the foreign tax department since 1981, head of corporate finance since 1990 and head of accounting and controlling since 1992. He became a deputy member in July 1997 and a full member of the management board of Allianz AG in January 2000. Dr. Gerhard Rupprecht: Joined the Allianz Group in 1979. In January 1989, he became a deputy member, and in January 1991 a full member, and in October 1991 was appointed chairman, of the management board of Allianz Leben. He became a member of the management board of Allianz AG in October 1991. Dr. Herbert Walter: Held various positions at Deutsche Bank AG since 1983, including chairman of the business segment Private & Business Clients and speaker of the management board of Deutsche Bank 24. Since 2002, he was a member of the Group Executive Committee of Deutsche Bank group as well as Global Head of Private & Business Clients. He became a member of the management board of Allianz AG on March 19, 2003, and became the Chairman of the management board of Dresdner Bank AG effective March 25, 2003. Dr. Werner Zedelius: Joined the Allianz Group in 1987. After various positions in branch offices and in the headquarters of Allianz AG, he was General Manager Finance and member of the board of directors of Cornhill Insurance PLC in London from 1996 until 1999. Dr. Zedelius became a member of the management board of Allianz AG on January 1, 2002. The members of the management board may be contacted at the address of Allianz AG. SUPERVISORY BOARD In accordance with the articles of association of Allianz AG and the German Codetermination Act (Mitbestimmungsgesetz), the supervisory board of Allianz AG consists of 20 members, ten of whom are elected by the shareholders and ten of whom are elected by the employees of the German companies of the Allianz Group. Three of the employee representatives are representatives of the trade unions represented in the Allianz Group in Germany. The general meeting may remove any supervisory board member it has elected by a simple majority of the votes cast. The employee representatives may be removed with a majority of three-quarters of the votes cast by those employees who elected them. In addition, any member of the supervisory board may resign by written notice to the management board. The supervisory board has a quorum when all members of the supervisory board were invited or requested to participate in a decision and either ten or more members, including the chairman of the supervisory board, or, when the chairman of the supervisory board is not 180 present, fifteen or more members, participate in a decision before the supervisory board. Except where a different majority is required by law or the articles of association of Allianz AG, the supervisory board acts by simple majority of the votes cast. In the case of any deadlock, the chairman has the deciding vote. The supervisory board meets at least twice each half-year. Its main functions are: - to monitor the management of Allianz AG; - to appoint the members of the management board; and - to approve matters in areas where such approval is required by German law or which the supervisory board has made generally or in the individual case subject to its approval. See "-- Management Board." In addition, supervisory boards of German insurance companies are tasked with the appointment of the auditors. The supervisory board has established a Standing Committee, an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Mediation Committee. Standing Committee. The Standing Committee, which comprises the chairman of the supervisory board, his deputy and three additional members elected by the supervisory board, may approve or disapprove certain transactions of Allianz AG to the extent that such transactions do not fall under the competency of any other committee or are required to be decided by plenary meeting of the supervisory board. The Standing Committee examines the corporate governance of Allianz AG, drafts the declaration of compliance and examines the efficiency of the work of the supervisory board. In addition, it determines the guest status of non-members who wish to attend supervisory board meetings as well as changes in form to the articles of association. The Standing Committee held four meetings in 2002. The members of the Standing Committee are Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle as chairman, Norbert Blix, Dr. Gerhard Cromme, Dr. Manfred Schneider and Peter Haimerl. Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, established in September 2002, comprises five members elected by the supervisory board. The Audit Committee prepares the decisions of the supervisory board about the Group's annual financial statements, the consolidated financial statements and the appointment of the auditors and ascertains the independence of the auditors. Furthermore, the Audit Committee assigns the mandate to the auditors, sets priorities for the audit and determines the compensation of the auditors. In addition, it examines the quarterly reports. After the end of the fiscal year, the Audit Committee examines the Group's annual financial statements and the consolidated financial statements, examines the risk monitoring system and discusses the auditor's report with the auditors. The Audit Committee held one meeting in 2002. The members of the Audit Committee are Dr. Manfred Schneider as chairman, Dr. Gerhard Cromme, Prof. Dr. Rudolf Hickel, Frank Ley and Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle. Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee consists of the chairman of the supervisory board and two other members elected by the supervisory board. It prepares the appointment of members of the management board. In addition, it tends to on-going personnel matters of the members of the management board including their membership on boards of other companies, the payments they receive and the structure of long-term incentive programs. See "-- Options to Purchase Securities -- Long-term Incentive Plans." The Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2002. The members of the Compensation Committee are Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle as chairman, Norbert Blix and Dr. Gerhard Cromme. Mediation Committee. The Mediation Committee consists of the chairman of the supervisory board and his representative elected according to the rules of the German Codetermination Act of 1976, one member elected by the employees and one member elected by the shareholders. Under sec. 27(3) of the German Codetermination Act, the Mediation Committee is charged with the 181 solution of conflicts in the appointment of members of the management board. If the supervisory board in a vote on the appointment or recall of a member of the management board fails to obtain the required majority, the Mediation Committee has to present a proposal to the supervisory board. There arose no need for the Mediation Committee to meet in 2002. The members of the Mediation Committee are Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle as chairman, Norbert Blix, Hinrich Feddersen and Jurgen E. Schrempp. Each member of the supervisory board is generally elected for a fixed term, which expires at the end of the general meeting at which the shareholders discharge the members of the supervisory board in respect of the fourth fiscal year after the beginning of the term. The fiscal year in which the members of the supervisory board are first elected is not considered. Supervisory board members may be reelected. The current members of the supervisory board of Allianz AG, their principal occupations, the year in which each member first served on the supervisory board, the year in which the current term of each member expires and principal memberships in statutory supervisory boards of each member outside the Allianz Group, respectively, are as follows: YEAR CURRENT YEAR FIRST TERM PRINCIPAL OUTSIDE BOARD NAME PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION APPOINTED EXPIRES MEMBERSHIPS IN 2002 ---------------------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------------------ Dr. Henning Schulte-Noelle, Former chairman of the 2003 2008 Member of the Chairman(1)..................... management board of supervisory boards of Allianz AG E.ON AG, Siemens AG and ThyssenKrupp AG Norbert Blix, Deputy Employee of Allianz 1997 2008 None Chairman(2)..................... Versicherung Dr. Wulf H. Bernotat(1)........... Chairman of the 2003 2008 Member of the management management board of E.ON boards of E.ON AG AG (chairman), Metro AG, RAG Aktiengesellschaft and Ruhrgas AG (chairman) Dr. Diethart Breipohl(1).......... Former member of the 2000 2008 Member of the management board of supervisory boards of Allianz AG Beiersdorf AG, Continental AG, KarstadtQuelle AG, mg technologies AG, KM Europa Metal AG (chairman), Banco Popular Espanol, Banco Portugues de Investimento and Credit Lyonnais Bertrand Collomb(1)............... President Directeur 1998 2008 Member of the boards of General of Lafarge S.A. directors of Total- Fina-Elf, ATCO Ltd. and the Conseil D'Administration of Credit Commercial de France S.A. 182 YEAR CURRENT YEAR FIRST TERM PRINCIPAL OUTSIDE BOARD NAME PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION APPOINTED EXPIRES MEMBERSHIPS IN 2002 ---------------------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------------------ Dr. Gerhard Cromme(1)............. Chairman of the 2001 2008 Member of the supervisory board of supervisory boards of ThyssenKrupp AG ThyssenKrupp AG (chairman), Axel Springer Verlag Aktiengesellschaft, Siemens AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, E.ON AG, Ruhrgas AG, Volkswagen AG and Suez S.A. Jurgen Dormann(1)................. Chairman of the board of 1998 2008 Member of the directors and CEO of ABB supervisory boards of Ltd. Aventis S.A. (chairman) and LION bioscience AG (chairman) and the board of directors of ABB Ltd. (chairman) and IBM Corporation Claudia Eggert-Lehmann(2)......... Employee of Dresdner Bank 2003 2008 None Hinrich Feddersen(2).............. Member of the federal 2001 2008 Member of the steering committee of supervisory boards of ver.di (Vereinte Deutscher Ring Dienstleistungs- Lebensversicherungs AG gewerkschaft e.V.) (deputy chairman) and Basler Versicherung Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH (deputy chairman) Peter Haimerl(2).................. Employee of Dresdner 2001 2008 None Bank; Chairman of the shop committee of Dresdner Bank Professor Dr. Rudolf Hickel(2).... Professor of Finance at 1999 2008 Member of the the University of Bremen supervisory boards of Salzgitter Stahl und Technologie AG, Howaldtswerke Deutsche Werft AG and Gewoba Aktiengesellschaft fur Wohnen und Bauen Dr. Renate Kocher(1).............. Head of Institut fur 2003 2008 Member of the Demoskopie, Allensbach supervisory boards of MAN AG and BASF AG Frank Ley(2)...................... Employee of Allianz 1993 2008 None Leben; Chairman of the shop committee of Allianz Leben Karl Neumeier(2).................. Employee of Allianz 2003 2008 None Versicherungs-AG 183 YEAR CURRENT YEAR FIRST TERM PRINCIPAL OUTSIDE BOARD NAME PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION APPOINTED EXPIRES MEMBERSHIPS IN 2002 ---------------------------------- ------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------------------ Herbert Pfennig(2)................ Employee of Dresdner Bank 2003 2008 None Sultan Salam(2)................... Employee of Dresdner Bank 2003 2008 None Dr. Manfred Schneider(1).......... Chairman of the 1998 2008 Member of the supervisory board of supervisory boards of Bayer AG Bayer AG (chairman), DaimlerChrysler AG, Linde AG, METRO AG, RWE AG and TUI AG Margit Schoffer(2)................ Employee of Dresdner Bank 2003 2008 None Dr. Herbert Scholl(1)............. Managing director of 1998 2008 Managing director of Robert Bosch GmbH Robert Bosch GmbH and member of the supervisory board of BASF AG Jurgen E. Schrempp(1)............. Chairman of the 1998 2008 Chairman of the management board of management board of DaimlerChrysler AG DaimlerChrysler AG and member of the board of directors of South- African Coal, Oil and Gas Corporation (Sasol) Ltd., Vodafone Group plc and The New York Stock Exchange --------------- (1) Elected by Allianz AG's shareholders. (2) Elected by the employees of the German companies of the Allianz Group. The members of the supervisory board may be contacted at the address of Allianz AG. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS Management Board. Total compensation for members of our management board includes a fixed component (the basic salary) and a variable component. The total compensation paid by the Allianz Group to the management board for 2002 was approximately E17.4 million. The compensation allocated to the management board in 2002 consisted of variable compensation of approximately E9.5 million and fixed compensation of approximately E7.9 million compared to E9.2 million and E6.7 million in 2001, respectively. Beginning in 2002, the variable component consisted of the annual bonus, which includes an individual element and an element based on 184 company performance, and a three-year bonus, from which payments to members of the management board can be made for the first time in 2004. In addition to these amounts, in 2002 the Allianz Group paid an amount of approximately E9 million to increase pension reserves and reserves for similar obligations in favor of active members of the management board. In addition, under the long-term incentive plan for 2002 described under '-- Options to Purchase Securities -- Long-term Incentive Plans", a total of 47,200 stock appreciation rights tied to the price of Allianz stock were awarded to members of the management board during the fiscal year 2002. Based on standard option valuation methods (Black-Scholes or Binomial Method), these rights had a value of E5.2 million at the time of their award. The value of these rights at December 31, 2002 was E0.3 million. Since none of the appreciation rights had an intrinsic or exercise value, these amounts are entirely time values. At December 31, 2002, members of our management board held a total of 119,739 stock appreciation rights awarded from 1999 through 2002 under the long-term Incentive Plans. Based on standard option valuation methods (Black-Scholes or Binomial Method), these rights had a value of E0.5 million at December 31, 2002. None of the appreciation rights had an intrinsic value at December 31, 2002, so that this amount is entirely a time value. For additional information on the appreciation rights held by members of our management board, see Note 44 to our consolidated financial statements. See also "-- Options to Purchase Securities -- Long-term Incentive Plans" below. In 2002, pensions and other benefit payments for former members of the management board as well as payments to compensate the claims of former members of the management board amounted to approximately E13 million. E7 million were set aside in 2002 for compensating the claims of former members of the management board. An amount of E29 million was set aside for current and future pension benefits of former members of the management board and their beneficiaries. Supervisory Board. The current articles of association provide that the remuneration of the members for service on the supervisory board until the annual general meeting held on April 29, 2003, is calculated according to the provisions of the articles of association effective prior to that time. Pursuant to these provisions, each member of the supervisory board receives an annual remuneration of E4,000, which increases by E500 for every cent by which the dividend per share exceeds the amount of 15 cents. The chairman of the supervisory board receives double these amounts, and every other member of a committee of the supervisory board (except the Mediation Committee) one and one half times these amounts. Allianz AG reimburses the members of the supervisory board members for their out-of-pocket expenses and the value-added tax payable on these salaries. In addition, Allianz AG provides insurance coverage and technical support to the supervisory board members to the extent reasonably adequate for the exercise of their supervisory board office. The aggregate amount of compensation paid to the members of the supervisory board for the fiscal year 2002 was E2 million, including fees becoming payable after the 2003 general meeting. On April 29, 2003, at the 2003 ordinary general meeting of Allianz AG, the management board and the supervisory board proposed, and the shareholders approved, revisions to the articles of association which relate to the compensation of the supervisory board. The respective resolutions became effective upon registration in the commercial register on June 23, 2003 and apply to service on the supervisory board following April 30, 2003. Pursuant to the new articles of association, each member of the supervisory board will receive an annual fixed remuneration of E4,000 and in addition, a remuneration of E500 for every cent by which the dividend per share declared by the annual general meeting exceeds the amount of 15 cents. The chairman of the supervisory board will receive double, and each vice chairman one and one half times, these amounts. Each member of a supervisory board committee (except the Mediation Committee and 185 the Audit Committee) will receive an additional 25% of these amounts, while the chairman of these committees will receive an additional 50%. Members of the Audit Committee will receive an additional annual fixed remuneration of E30,000, while the chairman will receive an additional E45,000. Members of the supervisory board who served for only part of the fiscal year shall receive one twelfth of the annual remuneration for each initiated month of service. This applies in the same manner to the members of supervisory board committees. The total annual remuneration of a member of the supervisory board shall not exceed double, and the remuneration of the chairman of the supervisory board shall not exceed triple, the sum of the annual fixed compensation and the additional dividend-related compensation of a member of the supervisory board who has none of these specific positions. Allianz AG reimburses all supervisory board members for their out-of-pocket expenses and the value-added tax payable on these salaries. In addition, Allianz AG provides insurance coverage and technical support to the supervisory board members to the extent reasonably adequate to carry out their supervisory board duties. BOARD PRACTICES Allianz AG has entered into service contracts with management board members providing for a limited benefit upon termination of service prior to the stated expiration date of a management board member's contract. In such circumstances, the management board member would receive monthly fixed payments for a further six months as well as pro rata bonus payments if the conditions for the bonus payments are fulfilled. If regular pension benefits were to become due during this time period, they would be credited against these payments. Allianz AG has not entered into such contracts with supervisory board members. SHARE OWNERSHIP As of June 18, 2003, the members of the management board and the supervisory board held less than 1% of our ordinary shares issued and outstanding. As of such date, based on our share register, the members of the management board and the supervisory board held in the aggregate approximately 6,700 ordinary shares of Allianz AG. EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 2002, Allianz Group had more than 181,000 employees worldwide, of whom more than 87,000, or approximately 48.1%, were employed in Germany. A large number of our German employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements or similar arrangements. In the past three years, there have been no work stoppages or strikes at our various sites that have arisen from collective bargaining disputes or for other reasons which had a material adverse effect on the Group's results of operations. We believe that our employee relations are good. The following table shows the average number of employees of the Allianz Group by region for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. AT DECEMBER 31, --------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 ------- ------- ------- Germany..................................................... 87,398 87,589 43,124 Rest of Europe.............................................. 66,657 61,892 50,569 NAFTA....................................................... 12,644 14,722 12,667 Rest of World............................................... 14,952 15,743 13,323 Total....................................................... 181,651 179,946 119,683 186 OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SECURITIES LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS Since 1999, we have established long-term incentive plans for the members of the management board of Allianz AG and eligible key executives of the Allianz Group, which are subject to approval by the supervisory board. As of the date of this annual report, long-term incentive plans were authorized for 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. Under these incentive plans, we granted non-transferable appreciation rights tied to the value of the ordinary shares of Allianz AG to members of the management board of Allianz AG and eligible key executives of the Allianz Group. The appreciation rights were granted on April 1 of each of these years. The rights expire after seven years. Under the relevant incentive plan, each plan participant is advised at the beginning of the plan of the number of the appreciation rights that have been granted to him or her. Each appreciation right entitles the holder to the difference between the price of Allianz AG's ordinary shares at the time the right is exercised and the base price of Allianz AG's ordinary shares as specified in the plan, the maximum difference being capped at 150% of the base price. The 2002, 2001 and 2000 incentive plans specify base prices of E265, E356 and E367, respectively. As of December 31, 2002, a total of 1,507,414 appreciation rights were outstanding under all incentive plans. Of this amount, 625,454 appreciation rights were outstanding under the 2002 incentive plan, 380,391 were outstanding under the 2001 incentive plan and 245,542 were outstanding under the 2000 incentive plan. The appreciation rights may be exercised at any time between the beginning of the third and the end of the seventh year after commencement of the relevant plan, provided that the closing stock price of Allianz AG in the Frankfurt Xetra Trade has exceeded the closing price of the Dow Jones Europe Stoxx Price Index (600) on each of at least five consecutive trading days and the closing stock price of Allianz AG in the Frankfurt Xetra Trade has appreciated as of the exercise date by at least 20% over the base price specified in the plan. Holders may not exercise an appreciation right within fixed time periods prior to the publication of quarterly, semi-annual or annual reports. At other times, an appreciation right may be exercised only with the approval of the Allianz Group's compliance department. Upon exercise of the appreciation rights, payment is made in the relevant local currency by the Group company granting the appreciation rights. Appreciation rights not exercised by the last day of a plan will be exercised automatically where the necessary conditions have been met. Where these conditions have not been met or a plan participant ceases to be employed by the Allianz Group for reasons other than disability or death, the plan participant's appreciation rights are forfeited. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP ARRANGEMENTS Allianz AG offers certain eligible employees and certain Allianz Group companies for their respective employees in Germany and abroad to buy its ordinary shares within a limited period of time at a discounted price per share. Costs for the arrangement are met by the relevant company. In general, to be eligible, employees are required to have been employed for a minimum period of six continuous months prior to the share offering. Employees are also subject to certain restrictions on the amount that may be invested to purchase the shares. Each participating Group subsidiary establishes a restricted period of at least one and maximum five years during which employees may not transfer the shares after purchasing them. After this period, the shares are not subject to vesting or other restrictions. The eligible employees of the Allianz Group acquired a total of 136,222 ordinary shares under such arrangements in 2002. For additional information on our long-term incentive plans and employee stock ownership arrangements, see Note 44 to our consolidated financial statements. 187 ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS The outstanding capital stock of Allianz AG consists of ordinary shares without par value that are issued in registered form. Under the articles of association, each outstanding ordinary share represents one vote. Major shareholders do not have different voting rights. Based on our share register, as of June 18, 2003, we had approximately 567,800 registered shareholders, of which approximately 1,950 were holders resident in the United States. Based on our share register, approximately 5.7% of our ordinary shares issued were held by such U.S. holders. Although our shareholders are generally required when registering to indicate their respective names, addresses and, in the case of legal entities, whether they hold on behalf of a third party, many of our ordinary shares may be held of record by brokers, trustees or other nominal holders who are not required to provide such information with regard to beneficial holders. As a result, the number of holders of record or registered holders in the United States may not be representative of the actual number of beneficial holders in the United States. See also "Directors, Senior Management and Employees -- Share Ownership." Under the German Securities Trading Act, holders of voting securities of a listed German company must notify the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority and the company of the level of their holding whenever it reaches, exceeds or falls below specified thresholds. These thresholds are 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 75% of a company's shares. In addition, effective January 1, 2002, the provisions of the German Securities Trading Act were amended to broaden the criteria for attribution of shares. The following table sets forth information about beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of the indicated date as to each person (or group of affiliated persons) known by us, through documents filed publicly with the SEC, to own beneficially more than 5% of the ordinary shares issued and outstanding, and as adjusted for recent changes in our outstanding ordinary shares. In addition, where different, we have indicated the percentage ownership provided by such shareholders in the filings under the new German reporting requirements discussed above. NUMBER OF OWNERSHIP ORDINARY SHARES OWNERSHIP REPORTED IN REPORTED IN REPORTED IN GERMAN NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER SEC FILINGS SEC FILINGS FILINGS(4) ------------------------ --------------- ------------ ------------ Munich Re.......................................... 51,487,400(1) 21.2%(1) 18.1%(5) Deutsche Bank...................................... 13,532,423(2) 5.5%(3) --(6) --------------- (1) As of December 31, 2002, as reported on June 19, 2003. In its report, Munich Re stated that such percentage was based on a total number of 266,565,625 ordinary shares issued by Allianz as of December 31, 2002, but did not include ordinary shares of Allianz AG owned by Allianz Group companies or by HypoVereinsbank. (2) As of December 31, 2002, as reported on February 10, 2003. In its report, Deutsche Bank stated that it had sole dispositive power over 13,532,423 ordinary shares, sole voting power over 12,428,173 ordinary shares, and beneficially owned 5.5% of Allianz's ordinary shares. On July 9, 2003, as of June 30, 2003, Deutsche Bank reported that it had sole dispositive power over 12,616,371 ordinary shares, sole voting power over 11,317,491 ordinary shares and beneficially owned 3.4% of Allianz's ordinary shares. (3) As of December 31, 2002, as reported on February 10, 2003. (4) Percentages have been rounded to a single decimal place. (5) As reported under the German Securities Trading Act on April 2, 2003. (6) Less than 5% as reported under the German Securities Trading Act on April 8, 2002. 188 As of June 18, 2003, 383,753,125 ordinary shares were issued but only 364,810,435 were outstanding, primarily as a result of our repurchase of 786,100 ordinary shares in May 2001 and our purchase of 5,500,000 ordinary shares from a subsidiary of Dresdner Bank in February 2002, as well as the holding of 17,155,008 ordinary shares by Dresdner Bank or its subsidiaries. Significant changes in the percentage ownership held of record by any of our major shareholders in the last three years were as follows: - the share ownership of Munich Re as reported under German law decreased from slightly less than 25% as of October 2000 to approximately 18.1% of our outstanding ordinary shares on April 2, 2003; - the share ownership of Deutsche Bank as reported to the SEC decreased from approximately 6.9% as of February 2001 to 5.5% as of December 31, 2002 and 3.4% as of June 30, 2003; and - the share ownership of HypoVereinsbank as reported under German law decreased from approximately 6.8% as of October 2000 to less than 5% in 2002. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The following describes certain transactions between the Allianz Group and its related parties since January 1, 2002. TRANSACTIONS WITH MUNICH RE As of June 30, 2003, we held approximately 18.9% of Munich Re's ordinary shares. On July 10, 2003 we announced our intention to redeem a first tranche of approximately 50% of our index-linked exchangeable (MILES) ahead of schedule, using Munich Re shares. This transaction, when completed, will reduce our shareholding in Munich Re by approximately 3%. As of April 2, 2003, based on its most recent German reporting, Munich Re held approximately 19.4% of our ordinary shares outstanding, which constituted approximately 18.1% of our ordinary shares issued as of such date. PRINCIPLES OF COOPERATION Certain principles of cooperation have historically governed the relationship between Allianz AG and Munich Re. These principles have been adapted to current circumstances in an agreement, dated May 2000 (or Principles of Cooperation), which sets forth the principles governing the cross-shareholdings, joint interests in third parties and reinsurance relationships between Allianz AG and Munich Re. The Principles of Cooperation were amended by a supplementary agreement in December 2001 (or First Supplement), effective through December 31, 2010, as well as a second supplementary agreement in December 2002 (or Second Supplement) and a third supplementary agreement on March 20, 2003 (or Third Supplement). The Principles of Cooperation are effective from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2005. Pursuant to the Second Supplement, the terms governing the termination of the Principles of Cooperation were suspended until December 31, 2003 and the required notice of termination reduced from three years to two years, with the result that the Principles of Cooperation will be automatically renewed for another ten years only if they are not terminated prior to December 31, 2003. Cross Shareholdings. In connection with the our capital increase in April 2003, we agreed with Munich Re in the Third Supplement to amend the provisions of the Principles of Cooperation relating to the long-term reciprocal shareholdings between Allianz AG and Munich Re. Pursuant to the Third Supplement, Munich Re agreed to reduce its ownership interest in Allianz AG to approximately 15% following the capital increase in April 2003, and Allianz AG agreed to reduce 189 its ownership interest in Munich Re to approximately 16% to 18% by the end of 2003 and to approximately 15% in the course of 2004. The Third Supplement does not relate to ordinary shares held in the ordinary course of business either as part of the trading portfolio or for the account of third parties. Shareholdings in Insurance Subsidiaries. The shareholdings of Allianz AG and Munich Re in certain jointly owned subsidiaries and affiliates were restructured in July 2002. See "-- Letter of Intent." Reinsurance Relationships. Munich Re is the primary external reinsurer for the Allianz Group. The Allianz Group ceded approximately E2.3 billion, E2.4 billion and E2.3 billion in reinsurance premiums written to Munich Re in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Of the Allianz Group's total third-party reinsurance premiums ceded, approximately 31.3%, 30.6% and 30.2% were ceded to Munich Re in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These amounts represented approximately 4%, 4% and 4% of the Allianz Group's gross premiums written in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Principles of Cooperation provide that Allianz AG will cede to Munich Re a 14% quota-share of the gross self-retention of the insurance business of Allianz Versicherung, Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG, Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG, Allianz Globus MAT (since renamed Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs-AG), Kraft Versicherungs-AG and Vereinte Spezial Versicherung-AG. Due to the merger of Vereinte Versicherung AG with Allianz Versicherung effective January 1, 2002, we agreed with Munich Re in August 2002 to reduce the share of the gross self-retention of the insurance business of German Property-Casualty Group companies ceded to Munich Re to 10.5%, effective retroactively to January 1, 2002. In addition, the Principles of Cooperation provide that Munich Re shall, subject to competitive conditions, assume a majority of reinsurance ceded by Allianz AG externally other than pursuant to the quota-share arrangements described above. The Principles of Cooperation further provide that Allianz AG and Munich Re shall share the reinsurance ceded by all other majority jointly held German insurance companies (other than the German Property-Casualty Group companies subject to the quota-share arrangements described above) pro rata based on each party's respective ownership interest in such companies. The Principles of Cooperation also provide that Allianz AG and Munich Re shall equally share, on an arm's-length basis, the reinsurance ceded by Allianz Leben and Karlsruher Leben. Finally, the Principles of Cooperation provide that Allianz AG shall be entitled to assume reinsurance from Munich Re, although the amounts and terms thereof are not specified. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, Munich Re ceded approximately E600 million, E850 million and E900 million, respectively, in reinsurance premiums to the Allianz Group. The First Supplement provides that the mutually ceded reinsurance volume between the Allianz Group and Munich Re is to be adjusted on a step-by-step basis by 2005. Allianz AG believes that the reinsurance it cedes to Munich Re and the reinsurance it assumes from Munich Re are on terms that are comparable to those that could be obtained from unrelated third parties. Termination. Upon termination of the Principles of Cooperation, each of Allianz AG and Munich Re may, after a two-year period from termination, sell the interests it holds in the other party, subject to a right of first offer and a right to designate the buyer on the part of the party whose shares are being sold. In addition, if the party whose shares are being sold exercises its right of first offer, the selling party shall be entitled to request the other party to sell to it or another designated person the shares of the selling party. Reciprocal rights of first refusal also apply to post-termination dispositions of interests in majority jointly held German insurance companies. Upon termination of the Principles of Cooperation, the existing reinsurance arrangements between Allianz AG and Munich Re will remain in force but may be terminated at any time pursuant to the provisions of the relevant reinsurance agreements. The reinsurance 190 arrangements with respect to majority jointly held entities will remain in effect. All disputes arising from the Principles of Cooperation are to be resolved through binding arbitration. LETTER OF INTENT Pursuant to a non-binding Letter of Intent, dated May 4, 2000 (or Letter of Intent), Allianz AG and Munich Re agreed to gradually reduce their shareholdings in each other to a level of approximately 20% of outstanding shares. As of June 30, 2003, the Allianz Group's ownership interest in Munich Re was approximately 18.9%. As of April 2, 2003, based on its most recent German reporting, Munich Re's ownership interest in Allianz AG was approximately 18.1%. See "-- Major Shareholders." In addition, pursuant to the Letter of Intent, the shareholdings of Allianz AG and Munich Re in certain jointly owned subsidiaries and affiliates were restructured in July 2002. As contemplated by the Letter of Intent, Munich Re transferred its indirect 45.0% interest in Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG and its indirect 50% interest in Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG to Allianz Versicherung, while Allianz AG transferred its indirect 36.1% interest in Karlsruher Leben and its 39% interest in Mercur Assistance AG Holding (or Mercur), a German provider of medical and automobile assistance services, to Munich Re. Pursuant to the Letter of Intent, Allianz AG sold its 39% interest in Mercur to Munich Re in 2000. The parties' other interests were transferred effective June 30, 2002. As a result of the restructuring, Munich Re holds approximately 90% of Karlsruher Leben, and Allianz AG holds approximately 90% of Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG and 99.9% of Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG. AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE In April 2001, in connection with our acquisition of Dresdner Bank, we entered into an Agreement in Principle with Munich Re (or Agreement in Principle), pursuant to which we sold a 16.0% shareholding in HypoVereinsbank to Munich Re for an aggregate price of approximately E5.133 billion on January 15, 2002, thereby reducing our shareholding in HypoVereinsbank to approximately 0.5%. In addition, we purchased from Munich Re its 40.6% shareholding in Allianz Leben for an aggregate price of E2.587 billion on January 15, 2002, thereby increasing our shareholding in Allianz Leben to 91.0%. The current reinsurance relationships between Allianz Leben and Munich Re are intended to remain in effect on the basis of existing contracts until 2010. The Agreement in Principle was amended by the Third Supplement, pursuant to which Munich Re agreed to reduce its ownership interest in Allianz AG to approximately 15% following our capital increase in April 2003, and Allianz AG agreed to reduce its ownership interest in Munich Re to approximately 16% to 18% by the end of 2003 and to approximately 15% in the course of 2004. OTHER TRANSACTIONS In addition to the arrangements described above, the Allianz Group and Munich Re and its subsidiaries enter into various transactions with each other in the ordinary course of business, including the provision of direct insurance by Allianz Group companies to Munich Re and its subsidiaries, and vice versa. Allianz expects these transactions to continue. TRANSACTIONS WITH HYPOVEREINSBANK Pursuant to the Agreement in Principle, we disposed of the Allianz Group's 16.0% shareholding in HypoVereinsbank to Munich Re in January 2002. See "-- Transactions with Munich Re -- Agreement in Principle." As of May 31, 2003, we held approximately 0.3% of the ordinary shares of HypoVereinsbank, and HypoVereinsbank, based on its most recent reporting under German law, owned less than 5% of our ordinary shares. 191 Allianz Group companies and HypoVereinsbank and its subsidiaries enter into a wide variety of transactions with each other in the ordinary course of business, including banking, insurance, broker-dealer, securities lending, joint venture and other transactions. TERROR RISK INSURANCE COMPANIES In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, terror risk insurance companies were founded in Germany and Luxembourg to address the existing shortage of direct insurance and reinsurance coverage for major risks in the international markets. The shareholders of these companies are a number of direct insurers and reinsurers, including companies of the Allianz Group. Allianz Versicherungs-AG holds a 16% interest in Deutsche EXTREMUS Versicherungs-AG (or EXTREMUS), which was registered on October 22, 2002 and has an equity capital of E50 million. Munich Re also holds a 16% interest in EXTREMUS. On the basis of the E10 billion state guarantee granted by the Federal Republic of Germany, EXTREMUS is able to provide excess coverage of up to E13 billion for terror risks encountered in Germany. Allianz AG also holds an 18.2% interest in Special Risk Insurance and Reinsurance Luxembourg S.A. (or SRIR), which was registered on April 4, 2002 and has an equity capital of E300 million. SRIR's new business was discontinued in March 2003 due to a lack of demand. OTHER RELATIONSHIPS In the normal course of business and subject to applicable legal restrictions, members of the management board and the supervisory board may be granted loans by Dresdner Bank, which are subject to the usual conditions in the industry. On December 31, 2002, loans to board members granted in previous years and amounting to E0.5 million were still outstanding, including E0.5 million to board members of subsidiaries. None of these loans was granted in the course of fiscal 2002. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION See pages F-1 through F-135 for the consolidated financial statements required by this item. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS GENERAL Allianz Group companies are involved in legal, regulatory and arbitration proceedings in Germany and a number of foreign jurisdictions, including the United States, involving claims by and against them, which arise in the ordinary course of their businesses, including in connection with their activities as insurers, employers, investors and taxpayers. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of all pending or threatened proceedings, management does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings, including the litigation and the Holocaust-related matters discussed below, will have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of Allianz Group, after consideration of any applicable reserves. LITIGATION In May 2001, a consolidated class action complaint seeking class action status, In re Deutsche Telekom Securities Litigation, was brought against Dresdner Bank and other defendants in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by purported purchasers of Deutsche Telekom American Depositary Shares (ADSs) issued pursuant to a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2000 and 192 pursuant to a prospectus dated June 17, 2000. Dresdner Bank, which was one of the underwriting syndicate's joint global coordinators, was one of the named defendants. The complaint alleges that the offering prospectus contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions relating to Deutsche Telekom. In October 2002, the court granted the plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The action seeks rescission of the sales and damages in an as yet unspecified amount. The management of Dresdner Bank believes the complaint is without merit insofar as it relates to Dresdner Bank. In August 2001, the European Commission initiated antitrust proceedings pursuant to Article 81 of the EU Treaty against various banks, including Dresdner Bank, in connection with alleged agreements to set prices for the exchange of foreign currencies within the EU. In December 2001, pursuant to these proceedings, the European Commission imposed a fine of E28 million against Dresdner Bank. The management of Dresdner Bank believes these proceedings are without merit as they relate to Dresdner Bank. In February 2002, Dresdner Bank initiated proceedings against the European Commission in the Court of First Instance of the European Community. Due to delayed pleadings by the European Commission, Dresdner Bank requested a judgment by default on June 25, 2002. In July 2002, the German Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt)commenced an investigation against several property-casualty insurance companies in Germany, including subsidiaries of Allianz AG, in connection with alleged coordinated behavior to achieve premium increases for the commercial and industrial property and liability insurance business. Also, in December 2001 the European Commission commenced a preliminary investigation against several insurance companies operating in London, including a subsidiary of Allianz AG, in connection with alleged anti-competitive behavior related to aviation war risk insurance in the London market. To date, the Allianz Group has not received any official complaint, or indication of any amount claimed, in either matter. Allianz AG cannot predict the outcome of these investigations at this time. On November 5, 2001, a lawsuit, Silverstein v. Swiss Re International Business Insurance Company Ltd., was filed against certain insurers and reinsurers, including Allianz Insurance Co., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking a determination that the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center constituted two separate occurrences under the alleged terms of various coverages. Allianz Insurance Co. has also filed suit against Silverstein on January 2, 2002, in connection with the coverage issues arising from the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center, and these and other related suits have been consolidated for discovery and other purposes. On January 30, 2003, the court rejected a motion by Allianz Insurance Co. seeking a determination by the court itself that the terror attack of September 11, 2001, constituted a single event. The judge referred this issue to the jury. Based on the policy wording at issue, we believe that the basis of Allianz Insurance Co.'s claim is sound, and that the Silverstein claims are without merit insofar as they relate to Allianz Insurance Co. In connection with the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 Allianz Group recorded net claims expense of approximately E1.5 billion in 2001 for the Allianz Group on the basis of one occurrence. In the event that liability is premised under a two occurrence theory, Allianz AG estimates that the Allianz Group may have an additional net exposure of approximately E200 million. On December 19, 2002, the insolvency administrator of KirchMedia GmbH & Co. KGaA (or KirchMedia) made a formal demand on Dresdner Bank to return a former KirchMedia shareholding to the insolvency assets (Insolvenzmasse) or to make payment to the insolvency assets to compensate for the loss of the shareholding. The shareholding, a 25% stake in the Spanish television group Telecinco, had been pledged by subsidiaries of KirchMedia to Dresdner Bank as collateral for a loan of E500 million from Dresdner Bank to KirchMedia's holding company, TaurusHolding GmbH & Co. KG (or TaurusHolding). Following TaurusHolding's default on the loan in April 2002 and insolvency in June 2002, Dresdner Bank enforced its security interest and acquired through a subsidiary the Telecinco shareholding in a forced auction sale. 193 The insolvency administrator contends that the pledge was created under circumstances that cause it to be invalid or void and may initiate legal action against Dresdner Bank. The management of Dresdner Bank believes that there is no valid basis for the insolvency administrator's demand. On May 24, 2002, pursuant to a statutory squeeze-out procedure, the general meeting of Dresdner Bank AG resolved to transfer shares from its minority shareholders to Allianz AG as principal shareholder in return for payment of a cash settlement amounting to E51.50 per share. The amount of the cash settlement was established by Allianz AG on the basis of an expert opinion, and its adequacy was confirmed by a court-appointed auditor. Some of the former minority shareholders applied for a court review of the appropriate amount of the cash settlement in a mediation procedure (Spruchverfahren), which is pending with the district court (Land-gericht) of Frankfurt. The outcome of this mediation procedure remains uncertain at this time. In the event that the court were to determine a higher amount as an appropriate cash settlement, this would affect all approximately 16 million shares which were transferred to Allianz AG. HOLOCAUST-RELATED MATTERS In July 2000, the governments of Germany and the United States signed an Executive Agreement, meant to secure a comprehensive and enduring resolution with respect to Holocaust-related claims brought against German companies and their non-German subsidiaries. Pursuant to the Executive Agreement, after being notified that a Holocaust-related claim has been asserted in a U.S. federal or state court against a German company, the U.S. government shall inform the court through a statement of interest that it is in the foreign policy interests of the United States for the Foundation for Remembrance, Responsibility and the Future (or the Foundation) to be the exclusive remedy and forum for resolving such claims against German companies and their subsidiaries, and that dismissal of such claims by U.S. federal and state courts is in the foreign policy interest of the United States. The U.S. government has consented to use its best efforts to achieve similar objectives with respect to legislation that has been implemented by the states of the United States since 1998, requiring insurance companies to report the status of policies sold in Europe prior to and during World War II. Some of these statutes provide for license suspension in the event of non-compliance. This legislation has been challenged primarily on constitutional grounds in federal courts in Florida and California by individual insurance companies and in addition, in California by the American Insurance Association. On October 2, 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit struck down the reporting provisions of the Florida statute as unconstitutional. The period for appeal of this decision has expired. In October 2001, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California struck down the California statute as unconstitutional. This decision was reversed by an appellate decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on July 15, 2002. On June 23, 2003, the United States Supreme Court struck down the California statute on constitutional grounds. In August 2000, the German government enacted legislation (or the Foundation Law) implementing the Foundation, which was funded with approximately E5.1 billion in equal parts from the German government and German companies. Allianz (including Dresdner Bank) has fulfilled all of its obligations as a member of the Foundation Initiative, and the Foundation Law explicitly provides that no further payments by donors such as Allianz are required. Eligible claims, including costs, are covered under the provisions of the Foundation Law. The Foundation began to distribute funds in mid-2001. Based on the Executive Agreement and statements of interest of the U.S. government, individual actions and purported class actions previously filed in the United States against Allianz AG and its subsidiaries, including Dresdner Bank, were dismissed since 2000. On June 21, 2001, Dresdner Bank was served with process in a purported Holocaust-related action, 194 Ungaro-Benages v. Dresdner Bank, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. On January 18, 2002, the U.S. government filed a statement of interest to the court. Upon the defendants' motion, the court rejected the action on February 14, 2003. On April 9, 2003, the plaintiff in this action filed an appeal. On May 31, 2002, Dresdner Bank was served with process in an additional Holocaust-related action, Widerynski v. Dresdner Bank, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Upon the defendant's motion, this action was rejected on January 31, 2003. On June 20, 2002, a new Holocaust-related action, Gross v. German Foundation Industrial Initiative, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Allianz AG, Dresdner Bank and other members of the German Foundation Industrial Initiative. So far, no service of process has taken place in connection with this action, and the Allianz Group has not received any indication of the amount claimed. DIVIDEND POLICY Allianz AG normally declares dividends at the annual general assembly of shareholders and has historically paid these dividends once a year. Under applicable German law, dividends may be declared and paid only from balance sheet profits as shown in the German statutory annual financial statements of Allianz AG. For each fiscal year, the management board approves the annual financial statements and submits them to the supervisory board with its proposal as to the appropriation of the annual profit. This proposal will set forth what amounts of the annual profit should be paid out as dividends, transferred to capital reserves, or carried forward to the next fiscal year. Upon approval by the supervisory board, the management board and the supervisory board submit their combined proposal to the shareholders at the shareholders' assembly. The general assembly of shareholders ultimately determines the appropriation of the annual profits, including the amount of the annual dividends. Shareholders generally participate in distributions of any dividends in proportion to the number of their ordinary shares. Any dividends declared by Allianz AG will be paid in euro. For information regarding annual dividends paid from 1998 through 2002, see "Key Information -- Dividends." SIGNIFICANT CHANGES For a description of significant developments since the date of the annual financial statements included in this annual report, see Note 44 to the consolidated financial statements. ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING TRADING MARKETS The principal trading market for the ordinary shares is the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The ordinary shares also trade on the other German stock exchanges in Berlin, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich and Stuttgart, as well as the stock exchanges in London, Paris and Zurich. The ADSs of Allianz AG, each representing one-tenth of an ordinary share, trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "AZ." See also "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Major Shareholders." MARKET PRICE INFORMATION The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange for the ordinary shares of Allianz AG as reported by Xetra. Since January 4, 1999, the first official trading day of 1999, the prices of shares traded on German stock exchanges, including the ordinary shares of Allianz AG, have been quoted in euros. In order to achieve comparability with the sales prices quoted in Deutsche marks during the 195 relevant periods in 1997 and 1998, the sales prices indicated for those periods have been converted into euros at the official conversion rate of DM1.95583 = E1.00. The table also shows, for the periods indicated, the highs and lows of the DAX. See the discussion under "Key Information -- Exchange Rate Information" for information with respect to rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and the Deutsche mark (translated into euros at the official conversion rate of DM1.95583 = E1.00) and the U.S. dollar and the euro applicable during the periods set forth below. PRICE PER ORDINARY SHARE(1) DAX ------------------ ------------------ HIGH LOW HIGH LOW ------- ------- ------- ------- (E) ANNUAL HIGHS AND LOWS 1998.................................................. 316.2 196.0 6,171.4 3,896.1 1999.................................................. 313.5 214.5 6,958.1 4,678.7 2000.................................................. 399.2 285.9 8,065.0 6,200.7 2001.................................................. 358.3 185.8 6,795.1 3,787.2 2002.................................................. 257.9 68.1 5,462.6 2,598.0 2003 (until June 18, 2003)............................ 89.4 41.1 3,304.2 2,203.0 QUARTERLY HIGHS AND LOWS 2001 First quarter......................................... 358.3 276.9 6,795.1 5,388.0 Second quarter........................................ 319.8 269.6 6,278.9 5,553.5 Third quarter......................................... 309.9 185.8 6,109.5 3,787.2 Fourth quarter........................................ 258.8 220.7 5,271.3 4,240.0 2002 First quarter......................................... 259.5 212.2 5,462.6 4,745.6 Second quarter........................................ 254.1 164.7 5,343.9 4,099.1 Third quarter......................................... 188.1 78.4 4,483.0 2,769.0 Fourth quarter........................................ 109.1 69.4 3,380.2 2,597.9 2003 First quarter......................................... 89.5 41.1 3,157.3 2,203.0 Second quarter (until June 18, 2003).................. 78.2 43.4 3,304.0 2,450.2 MONTHLY HIGHS AND LOWS 2002 December.............................................. 104.0 81.4 3,380.2 2,840.0 2003 January............................................... 89.4 66.1 3,157.3 2,643.8 February.............................................. 69.6 57.5 2,752.0 2,450.2 March................................................. 61.5 41.1 2,715.1 2,203.0 April................................................. 63.4 43.4 2,974.4 2,450.2 May................................................... 69.5 59.0 3,067.0 2,822.8 June (until June 18, 2003)............................ 78.2 66.8 3,304.2 3,026.8 --------------- (1) Adjusted to reflect the capital increase in April 2003. On June 18, 2003, the closing sale price per Allianz AG ordinary share on XETRA was E78.00, which was equivalent to US$91.42 per ordinary share, translated at the noon buying rate for euros on such date. 196 Based on turnover statistics supplied by Bloomberg, the average daily volume of the ordinary shares of Allianz AG traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (XETRA) between January 1, 2003 and June 18, 2003 was 4,476,881. TRADING ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE Official trading of Allianz AG ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange commenced on November 3, 2000. Allianz AG ADSs trade under the symbol "AZ." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices per Allianz AG ADS as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape: PRICE PER ADS ------------- HIGH LOW ----- ----- ($) ANNUAL HIGHS AND LOWS 2000 (from November 3, 2000)................................ 37.5 33.4 2001........................................................ 37.6 18.7 2002........................................................ 25.2 7.5 2003 (until June 18, 2003).................................. 10.5 5.0 QUARTERLY HIGHS AND LOWS 2001 First quarter............................................... 37.6 27.0 Second quarter.............................................. 30.2 26.2 Third quarter............................................... 29.9 18.7 Fourth quarter.............................................. 25.4 22.2 2002 First quarter............................................... 25.2 20.7 Second quarter.............................................. 25.1 17.9 Third quarter............................................... 20.4 8.6 Fourth quarter.............................................. 12.3 7.5 2003 First quarter............................................... 10.5 5.0 Second quarter (until June 18, 2003)........................ 9.3 5.3 MONTHLY HIGHS AND LOWS 2002 December.................................................... 11.5 9.3 2003 January..................................................... 10.5 7.8 February.................................................... 8.2 6.9 March....................................................... 7.5 5.0 April....................................................... 8.1 5.3 May......................................................... 7.9 7.0 June (until June 18, 2003).................................. 9.3 7.9 On June 18, 2003, the closing sales price per Allianz AG ADS on the New York Stock Exchange as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape was US$9.11. 197 ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Information relating to Allianz AG's memorandum and articles of association is incorporated in this annual report by reference to Allianz AG's Registration Statement on Form 20-F (File No. 1-15154) as filed with the SEC on October 31, 2000. OBJECTS AND PURPOSES The objects and purposes of Allianz AG as described in article 1, paragraph 2 of our articles of association are to direct an international group of companies that are active in the areas of insurance, banking, asset management and other financial, consulting and similar services, and to hold ownership interests in insurance companies, banks, industrial companies, investment companies and other companies. As a reinsurer, Allianz AG primarily assumes insurance business from Group companies and other companies in which Allianz AG holds ownership interests. SHARE CAPITAL The following is a summary of material information concerning the share capital of Allianz AG. This summary is not complete and is qualified by reference to Allianz AG's articles of association and German law as in effect at the date of this annual report. Copies of the articles of association are publicly available from the Commercial Register in Munich or in German- and English-language versions at our headquarters, and an English translation has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States. GENERAL Allianz AG is a stock corporation organized in the Federal Republic of Germany under the German Stock Corporation Act. It is registered in the Commercial Register in Munich, Germany under the entry number HR B 7158. The share capital of Allianz AG consists of ordinary shares without par value. As of June 18, 2003, the issued share capital of Allianz AG was E982,408,000, divided into 383,753,125 registered shares, of which 364,810,435 shares were outstanding. See also "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Major Shareholders." SHARE CAPITAL INCREASES AND DECREASES Allianz AG has several categories of authorized capital. At the annual general meeting on April 29, 2003, the shareholders approved the following authorized capital for issuance by the management board (with the approval of the supervisory board) of new registered shares: - Up to E300,000,000 in the aggregate on one or more occasions on or before April 28, 2008 by issuing new registered no-par ordinary shares against contributions in cash or in kind, of which amount E300,000,000 remain as of June 18, 2003. The management board is authorized, upon the approval of the supervisory board, to exclude shareholders' preemptive rights with respect to shares issued against contributions in kind. Whenever shares are issued against contributions in cash, the shareholders shall retain their preemptive rights. The management board is nevertheless authorized, upon the approval of the supervisory board, to exclude fractional amounts from the shareholders' preemptive rights. The management board is further authorized, upon the approval of the supervisory board, to exclude shareholders' preemptive rights in the case of a capital increase against contributions in cash when the issue price is not substantially lower than the market price, subject to certain additional limitations in accordance with the German Stock Corporation Act. 198 - Up to E7,841,187.84 in the aggregate on one or more occasions on or before July 10, 2006 by issuing new registered no-par ordinary shares against contributions in cash, of which amount E7,841,187.84 remain as of June 18, 2003. The management board is authorized, with the consent of the supervisory board, to exclude shareholders' preemptive rights in order to issue shares to the employees of Allianz AG and its Group companies. - Up to E10,000,000 in the aggregate on one or more occasions on or before April 28, 2008 by issuing new registered no-par ordinary shares against contributions in cash, of which amount E10,000,000 remain as of June 18, 2003. The management board is authorized, upon the approval of the supervisory board, to exclude the shareholder preemptive rights as to these ordinary shares in order to grant bearers of conversion privileges or option rights issued by Allianz AG or its group member companies a right to subscribe to that number of new shares in future cash capital increases to which they would be entitled on exercising their option right or conversion privilege. The shareholders have conditionally increased the share capital by an aggregate amount of E50,000,000.00. The conditional increase in capital will be carried out only to the extent that the holders of convertible bonds or bonds with warrants issued by Allianz AG, or by majority owned direct or indirect group subsidiaries, against payment in cash pursuant to the authorization approved by the annual general meeting of shareholders on July 11, 2001 for the period up to July 10, 2006, exercise their conversion and/or option rights, or to the extent that holders of mandatory convertible bonds fulfill their conversion obligation, and insofar as no treasury shares are delivered to the holders of the bonds. With respect to purchases of our own ordinary shares, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements. CAPITAL INCREASE In April 2003, by way of a rights offering, we raised approximately E4.4 billion, based on a subscription price of E38.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately E4.3 billion after deduction of the commission payable to the underwriters. We increased our issued share capital by E300,000,000 to E982,408,000 by issuing 117,187,500 new no-par value shares with full dividend entitlement for the 2003 fiscal year. MATERIAL CONTRACTS For information on material contracts to which Allianz AG or any of its subsidiaries was a party in the preceding two years, see "Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions -- Related Party Transactions." EXCHANGE CONTROLS Germany does not generally restrict capital movements between Germany and other countries, institutions or persons. Restrictions currently exist with respect to Iraq and the Taliban, among others, as a result of UN resolutions and EU rules. For statistical purposes, subject to certain exceptions, each company or person domiciled in Germany is required to report to the German Bundesbank each payment received from or made to a company or person not domiciled in Germany in excess of E12,500 (or an equivalent amount in a foreign currency). Moreover, all claims and liabilities of a company or person domiciled in Germany against or towards a company or person not domiciled in Germany in excess of E5 million (or an equivalent amount in a foreign currency) are required to be reported monthly to the German Bundesbank. 199 Other than as described above, there is no limitation on the right of non-resident or foreign owners to receive dividends or other payments relating to the ordinary shares or the ADSs permitted or granted by German law. Various national, state and other laws relating to the acquisition of "control" of Allianz AG's insurance and banking subsidiaries may impose limitations on the ability to acquire ordinary shares or ADSs beyond specified thresholds. In addition, some national laws may authorize investigation of certain money transfers. See "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Regulation and Supervision -- Acquisition Control Matters." TAXATION GERMAN TAXATION The following discussion is a summary of the material German tax consequences for beneficial owners of shares or ADSs who are (i) not German residents for German income tax purposes (i.e., persons whose residence, habitual abode, statutory seat or place of effective management and control is not located in Germany) and (ii) whose shares do not form part of the business property of a permanent establishment or fixed base in Germany. Throughout this section we refer to these owners as "Non-German Holders." This summary is based on German tax laws and typical tax treaties to which Germany is a party as they are in effect on the date hereof and is subject to changes in German tax laws or such treaties. This summary also reflects changes resulting from the German Tax Reduction Act (which we refer to as the German Tax Reform) approved by the German legislature in July 2000. Most changes out of the German Tax Reform were implemented effective January 1, 2001. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive discussion of all German tax consequences which may be relevant for Non-German Holders. You should consult your tax advisor regarding the German federal, state and local tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs and the procedures to follow for the refund of German taxes withheld from dividends. TAXATION OF THE COMPANY IN GERMANY German corporations with a fiscal year that equals the calendar year, including Allianz AG, are generally subject to a corporate income tax rate of 25%. The solidarity surcharge of 5.5% on the net assessed corporate income tax has been retained in 2002, so that the corporate income tax and the solidarity surcharge, in the aggregate, amount to approximately 26.38%. Solely for the year 2003, the corporate income tax rate will amount to 26.5% plus the solidarity surcharge of 5.5% on the net assessed corporate income tax, so that the corporate income tax and the surcharge, in the aggregate, will amount to approximately 27.96%. In addition, German corporations are subject to profit-related trade tax on income, the exact amount of which depends on the municipality in which the corporation maintains its business establishment(s). Trade tax on income is a deductible item in computing the corporation's tax base for corporate income tax purposes. TAXATION OF DIVIDENDS The German Tax Reform abolished the corporate income tax credit system and introduced a classic corporate tax system. Under the new system, a tax credit is no longer attached to the dividends. To avoid multiple levels of taxation in a corporate chain, the law provides for an exemption comparable to a full dividend received deduction for inter-corporate dividends at the level of a German corporate shareholder. German resident individuals are required to recognize 50% of the dividends received as taxable income. Dividends received from non-qualifying 200 participations, which are participations of less than 10%, are subject to trade tax on income. The new system applies to dividend distributions paid by Allianz AG in 2002 for the financial year 2001 and in subsequent years. Certain transition rules apply in connection with the change from the corporate income tax credit system in effect in 2000 to the new system. IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING TAX Dividend distributions by a German corporation with a fiscal year that equals the calendar year on or after January 1, 2002 are subject to a 20% withholding tax. In addition, a solidarity surcharge at a rate of 5.5% on the withholding tax is levied such that the aggregate withholding from dividends is 21.1% of the declared dividend. The withholding tax is generally withheld irrespective of whether and to what extent the dividend distribution is exempt at the level of the holder. If you are a Non-German Holder, the withholding tax rate may be reduced in accordance with an applicable income tax treaty. Under most income tax treaties to which Germany is a party, including the U.S.-German income tax treaty, the rate of dividend withholding tax for individual holders and corporate holders of a non-qualifying participation is reduced to 15%. In that case, the Non-German Holder eligible for the reduced treaty rate may apply for a refund of 6.1% of the declared dividend for dividend distributions paid on or after January 1, 2002 by Allianz AG. The application for refund must be filed with the German Federal Tax Office (Bundesamt fur Finanzen, Friedhofstrasse 1, D-53225 Bonn, Germany). The relevant forms can be obtained from the German Federal Tax Office or from German embassies and consulates. REFUND PROCEDURE FOR U.S. SHAREHOLDERS For shares and ADSs kept in custody with The Depository Trust Company in New York or one of its participating banks, the German tax authorities have introduced a collective procedure for the refund of German dividend withholding tax and the solidarity surcharge thereon on a trial basis. Under this procedure, The Depository Trust Company may submit claims for refunds payable to eligible U.S. holders as defined below under "-- United States Taxation" under the Treaty collectively to the German tax authorities on behalf of these eligible U.S. holders. The German Federal Tax Office will pay the refund amounts on a preliminary basis to The Depository Trust Company, which will redistribute these amounts to the eligible U.S. holders according to the regulations governing the procedure. The German Federal Tax Office may review whether the refund was made in accordance with the law within four years after making the payment to The Depository Trust Company. Details of this collective procedure are available from The Depository Trust Company. Individual claims for refunds may be made on a special German form which must be filed with the German Federal Tax Office at the address noted above. Copies of such form may be obtained from the German Federal Tax Office at the same address or from the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany, 4645 Reservoir Road, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20007-1998. Claims must be filed within a four-year period from the end of the calendar year in which the dividend was received. Holders who are entitled to a refund in excess of E150 for the calendar year generally must file their refund claims on an individual basis. However, the custodian bank may be in a position to make refund claims on behalf of such holders. As part of the individual refund claim, an eligible U.S. holder must submit to the German tax authorities the original bank voucher (or a certified copy thereof) issued by the paying agent documenting the tax withheld, and an official certification on IRS Form 6166 of its last United States federal income tax return. IRS Form 6166 may be obtained by filing a request with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Foreign Certification Request, P.O. Box 16347, Philadelphia, PA 19114-0447. Requests for certification must include the eligible U.S. holder's name, Social Security or Employer Identification Number, tax return form number, 201 and tax period for which the certification is requested. Requests for certifications can include a request to the Internal Revenue Service to send the certification directly to the German tax authorities. If no such request is made, the Internal Revenue Service will send a certification on IRS Form 6166 to the eligible U.S. holder, who then must submit this document with his refund claim. TAXATION OF CAPITAL GAINS Under German domestic tax law as in effect in 2002, capital gains derived on or after January 1, 2002 by a Non-German Holder from the sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs are subject to tax in Germany only if such Non-German Holder has held, directly or indirectly, shares or ADSs representing 1% or more of the registered share capital of the company at any time during the five-year period immediately preceding the disposition. In computing the relevant size of a Non-German Holder's shareholding, shareholdings already existing prior to the effective date of the German Tax Reform are also taken into account. Pursuant to the German Tax Reform, corporate Non-German Holders are fully exempt from German tax on capital gains derived on or after January 1, 2002 from the sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs in a German corporation with a fiscal year that equals the calendar year. Half of the capital gains realized by the individual Non-German Holders are subject to German individual income tax plus a 5.5% solidarity surcharge. U.S. holders that qualify for benefits under the Treaty are exempt in Germany under the Treaty on capital gains derived from the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs. INHERITANCE AND GIFT TAX Under German law, German gift or inheritance tax will be imposed on transfers of shares or ADSs by a Non-German Holder at death or by way of gift, if (i) the decedent or donor, or the heir, donee or other transferee has his residence in Germany at the time of the transfer or with respect to German citizens who are not resident in Germany, if the decedent or donor, or the heir, donee or other transferee has not been continuously outside of Germany for a period of more than five years; or (ii) the shares or ADSs subject to such transfer form part of a portfolio which represents 10% or more of the registered share capital of the company and has been held, directly or indirectly, by the decedent or donor, respectively, himself or together with related parties. The right of the German government to impose inheritance or gift tax on a Non-German Holder may be further limited by an applicable estate tax treaty (such as the U.S.-German Inheritances and Gifts Tax Treaty of December 3, 1980). OTHER TAXES No German transfer, stamp or similar taxes apply to the purchase, sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs by a Non-German Holder. Currently, net worth tax is not levied in Germany. UNITED STATES TAXATION This section describes the principal United States federal income tax consequences of owning ordinary shares or ADSs. It applies to you only if you hold your ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. This section does not address all material tax consequences 202 of owning ordinary shares or ADSs. It does not address special classes of holders, some of whom may be subject to other rules, including: - dealers in securities or currencies; - tax-exempt entities; - life insurance companies; - broker-dealers; - traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings; - investors liable for alternative minimum tax; - investors that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the voting stock of Allianz AG; - investors that hold ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction; or - investors whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, and published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect, as well as on the Treaty. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. In general, for United States federal income tax purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will be treated as the owner of the shares represented by those ADSs. Exchanges of shares for ADRs, and ADRs for shares, generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax. You are a "U.S. holder" if you are a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs and you are, for United States federal income tax purposes: - a citizen or resident of the United States; - a domestic corporation; - an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or - a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust's administration and one or more United States persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust. You are an "eligible U.S. holder" if you are a U.S. holder that: - is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty; - does not maintain a permanent establishment or fixed base in Germany to which the ordinary shares or ADSs are attributable and through which you carry on or have carried on business (or, in the case of an individual, perform or have performed independent personal services); and - is otherwise eligible for benefits under the Treaty with respect to income and gain from the ordinary shares or ADSs. You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the United States federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of ordinary shares and ADSs in your 203 particular circumstances. In particular, you should confirm whether you qualify for the benefits of the Treaty and the consequences of failing to do so. TAXATION OF DIVIDENDS If you are a U.S. holder, the gross amount of any dividend we pay out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes) is subject to United States federal income taxation. If you are a noncorporate U.S. holder, dividends paid to you in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002 and before January 1, 2009 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to you at a maximum tax rate of 15% provided that you hold the ordinary shares or ADSs for more than 60 days during the 120 day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding period requirements. Dividends we pay with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be qualified dividend income. You must include any German tax withheld from the dividend payment in this gross amount even though you do not in fact receive it. The dividend is taxable to you when you, in the case of ordinary shares, or the depositary, in the case of ADSs, receive the dividend, actually or constructively. The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to United States corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations. The amount of the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a U.S. holder will be the U.S. dollar value of the gross dividend amount, determined at the spot euro/U.S. dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date you include the dividend payment in income to the date you convert the payment into U.S. dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. The currency gain or loss generally will be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of your basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain. Subject to certain limitations, the German tax withheld in accordance with German law or the Treaty and paid over to Germany will be creditable against your United States federal income tax liability. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available to you under German law or under the Treaty, the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability. See "-- German Taxation -- Refund Procedure for U.S. Shareholders," above, for the procedures for obtaining a tax refund. Special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the maximum 15% tax rate. Dividends constitute income from sources outside the United States, but generally will be "passive income" or "financial services income" which are treated separately from other types of income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to you. TAXATION OF CAPITAL GAINS If you are a U.S. holder and sell or otherwise dispose of your ordinary shares or ADSs, you will recognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount that you realize and your tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in your ordinary shares or ADSs. Capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. holder that is recognized on or after May 6, 2003 and before January 1, 2009 is generally taxed at a maximum rate of 15% where the property is held for more than one year. Gain or loss generally will be treated as arising from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. 204 DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY Allianz AG is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with these requirements, Allianz AG files reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials, including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the Commission's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of the materials may be obtained from the Commission's Public Reference Room at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Commission's Public Reference Room by calling the Commission in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission also maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. Allianz AG's annual reports and some of the other information submitted by Allianz AG to the Commission may be accessed through this web site. In addition, material filed by Allianz AG can be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. 205 ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK As a provider of financial services, we consider risk management one of our core competencies. As a result, risk management is an integrated part of our controlling process, which involves identifying, measuring, aggregating and managing risks. This process is used to determine how capital is allocated to our divisions for performance and risk measurement purposes. RISK MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITIES In our business, successful management essentially means controlling risks in order to increase the value of the Allianz Group. This is done through risk-based allocation of capital resources and activities required to achieve sustainable growth. As a result, Allianz AG's Management Board formulates our business objectives on the basis of return and risk criteria. These objectives are implemented by the Allianz Group Center and the local operational units. Our risk-control strategy involves assignment of responsibility for risk management to local entities, which operate within the legal frameworks applicable for their respective locations. This decentralized approach is complemented by centralized responsibility. This is necessary because we need to deal with an accumulation of global risks which can considerably increase potential risk exposure. As a result, central controls are essential. The responsibility for central control lies with Group Risk Controlling, a unit that was expanded in 2002. Central control now also includes the banking business. Group Controlling assesses the Allianz Group's risk exposure on the basis of local and global risks. The results of these analyses are then submitted to senior management. At the same time, Group Controlling aims to ensure that the processes are transparent and comprehensive. Risk management activities are supervised by both internal and external auditors. RISK CATEGORIES Our total risk exposure is subdivided into individual risk categories: ACTUARIAL RISKS. These risks are based on the technicalities of our insurance business: we must guarantee future payment commitments, and the volume of such payments must be calculated in advance. Different actuarial risks exist in the various insurance lines. In property and casualty insurance, actuarial risks arise from an unexpected variance, i.e. the volume of losses exceeds premiums fixed in advance (premium risk), or the payout for claims made is higher than the corresponding provisions (reserve risk). In life insurance, actuarial risks arise because we are committed to making guaranteed long-term payments in return for a fixed insurance premium calculated in advance, even though the biometric data of the population may change over time (for example, longer life expectancy as a result of medical progress). CREDIT AND COUNTERPARTY RISKS. These risks involve potential losses that may result from the default of a business partner. "Default" means the inability or refusal of a counterparty, an issuer or another contracting party to meet contractual obligations. Credit risk also includes the risk of a deterioration of a business partner's creditworthiness. It thus includes credit risks from the lending business and credit insurance, counterparty risks from trading activities as well as country risks in connection with cross-border transactions and the local business of foreign units. Counterparty risks from trading activities relate primarily to derivatives and especially over-the-counter (OTC) transactions. In the insurance business, these risks stem from the possibility that receivables may remain unpaid, in particular those due from reinsurers. 206 MARKET RISKS. Market risks result from portfolio valuation fluctuations due to changes in share prices, interest rates or exchange rates. Also risk relevant are changes observed in the variation behavior (volatility) of an asset price, for example. In the banking business, the volatility risk especially concerns trading activities, which are shown in the institution's trading portfolio. Unlike the latter, the non-trading portfolio, which contains customer business and strategic investments, is exposed to long-term factors. In this case, the market risk is essentially the interest rate risk resulting from granting long-term fixed-rate loans, which are funded in part by short-term deposits. In addition, loans and deposits in foreign currencies are exposed to currency risks. INVESTMENT RISKS. Investment risks in the insurance business primarily include all counterparty and market risks. There is a direct link between investments and obligations to our customers. Certain insurance lines are exposed to an interest guarantee risk. Life insurance, for example, must generate the guaranteed interest payment agreed upon. LIQUIDITY RISKS. These risks can materialize under various circumstances, for example, if present or future payment obligations cannot be met in full or as of the due date, or if refinancing capital can only be raised at higher rates (refinancing risk) in the case of a liquidity crisis or if assets can only be liquidated below current market prices (market liquidity risk). HEALTH INSURANCE RISKS. Health insurance risks are treated either as property and casualty insurance risks or as life and health insurance risks, depending on the segment to which the health insurance is assigned in the given market. MANAGEMENT THROUGH RISK CAPITAL We control our activities through our respective local companies. Economic Value Added (EVA) and risk capital are the most important parameters used in the context of our risk-based controlling process. Risk capital is required to cover unexpected losses. The amount of risk capital is calculated by using internal models. These models are based on generally accepted quantification methods, which are used for purposes of group internal risk management as well. In the insurance business, we calculate risk capital for premium, reserve, investment and credit risks. Within these risk categories, we distinguish between the following types of risks: - Actuarial risks, which, in the area of property and casualty insurance, include the premium and reserve risks for the various insurance lines. Reinsurance is considered separately. In the case of life insurance, we calculate the insurance provisions required. - Investment risks, which include market and counterparty risks. The market risks are subdivided according to dividend-bearing instruments, interest-bearing instruments and real estate. The credit and counterparty risk as part of investment risks is assessed on the basis of the debtor creditworthiness or rating class. - Credit and counterparty risks in connection with receivables in the insurance business. This risk is mainly assessed on the basis of the financial strength or the rating class of our reinsurance partners. In 2002, we launched a comprehensive project to substantially improve internal risk analysis in the insurance business. Our new tools enable us to systematically evaluate internal data by means of models based on the theory of probability. This process takes into account the special characteristics of our local units as well as the specific nature of their risks. It also takes into account portfolio effects. In the current year, we intend to further develop this large-scale project. At present, we use risk capital models provided by the Standard & Poor's rating agency. 207 RISK CONTROLLING IN OUR INSURANCE BUSINESS To control risks in the insurance business, we focus on premium risks, reserve risks, credit and counterparty risks and investment risks. PREMIUM RISKS. Premium risks are controlled primarily with the help of actuarial models used to calculate premiums and monitor claim patterns. In addition, we issue guidelines for concluding insurance contracts and assuming insurance risks. In the case of life insurance, we essentially concentrate on biometric risks -- for example, life expectancy, disability, illness and long-term care requirements. We also focus on risks that could arise from future policy cancellations. Risk management also includes participation in scientific and technical loss prevention. We regularly carry out technical studies for the manufacturing and automobile industries. The purpose of these studies is to reduce the probability of claims and keep losses to a minimum. Natural disasters such as earthquakes, storms and floods represent a special challenge for risk management. Although they happen considerably less frequently than other incidents, the consequences can be far more extensive when, for example, entire regions are devastated. We use special modeling techniques to control such risks. They involve the collection of data on earthquakes and weather patterns, which are used to simulate natural disaster scenarios and estimate the potential for damage. RESERVE RISKS. We must constitute provisions for insurance claims that have been submitted but not yet settled. The amount is estimated on the basis of past experience and on the use of statistical methods. We also seek to limit risks by constantly monitoring the development of these provisions and using the information we obtain to make forecasts. In the area of life insurance, reserves are calculated by using actuarial methods. In addition to other criteria, these calculations take into account the biometric data of the populations insured by using, for example, national mortality tables. See "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Property-Casualty Insurance Reserves" for a discussion of certain historical data concerning the development of our property-casualty insurance reserves. CREDIT AND COUNTERPARTY RISKS. To limit our liability from insurance business we cede part of the risks we assume to the international reinsurance market when necessary. When selecting our reinsurance partners, we consider only companies that we judge to offer excellent security. Our Group companies use comprehensive rating information for the active management of credit risks. This information is either in the public domain or gathered through internal investigations. INVESTMENT RISKS. Investments are an integral part of insurance coverage. They ensure our ability to meet the payment commitments we make in our insurance contracts. The link between insurance obligations and investment of the capital related to these obligations is monitored by using specific models. This also enables us to manage risks arising from interest guarantees provided to our customers. We monitor market risks by means of sensitivity analyses and stress testing. Exchange rate fluctuations represent a risk that can essentially be disregarded because our insurance commitments are generally backed by funds in the same currency. We limit credit risks by setting high requirements on the creditworthiness of our debtors and by spreading the risk. We consolidate our exposure according to debtors, and across all investment categories, and use limit lists to monitor exposure. In individual cases, we use derivative financial instruments such as swaps, options and futures to hedge against changes in prices or interest rates. The end-users of these derivatives are Allianz Group companies. We believe that our internal investment and monitoring rules are stricter than the regulations imposed by supervisory authorities. 208 Market and counterparty risks arising from the use of derivative financial instruments are subject to particularly strict control procedures. Credit risks are assessed by calculating replacement values; market risks are monitored by means of up-to-date value-at-risk calculations and stress tests and limited by specifying stop-loss limits. We seek to limit liquidity risks by reconciling our investment portfolio with our insurance commitments. In addition, we plan our cash flow from ordinary activities. Asset structure and diversification are other elements in our management of investment risk. ORGANIZATIONAL RISK CONTROLLING. In terms of organization, we seek to limit our investment risks through a clear separation of management and controlling functions. Within the Group, risk management is implemented in cooperation with the local units in a top-down, bottom-up process. The Allianz Finance Committee, which is made up of members of Allianz AG's Management Board, delegates significant decision-making authority to the regional Finance Committees, which monitor activities in their respective regions or countries. The duties and responsibilities at each decision-making level are defined by guidelines issued at the Group level. These guidelines are then applied by the regional Finance Committees, which formulate specific local investment guidelines. These are adapted according to national legislation and the nature of the local insurance and capital markets. Operational responsibility for investment portfolios lies with the local units. RISK CAPITAL. At the end of fiscal 2002, risk capital before minority interests was composed as follows: In property and casualty insurance E16.1 billion was allocated for actuarial risks, E0.8 billion for credit and counterparty risks and E3.9 billion for investment risks. Risk capital in life insurance came to a total of E11.1 billion as of December 31, 2002. It is our policy that, as a minimum, the capital we allocate to our local units meets the requirements for an A rating from Standard & Poor's. RISK CONTROLLING IN OUR BANKING BUSINESS In this business segment, the following types of risks are controlled: credit and counterparty risks including counterparty risks from trading activities, country risks, market risks in the trading and investment portfolios, and liquidity risks. See "Information on the Company and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects -- Selected Statistical Information Relating to Our Banking Operations" for further information concerning our bank lending, investment and deposit portfolios. CREDIT AND COUNTERPARTY RISKS. These risks are directly linked to granting credits in the banking business. Dresdner Bank controls these risks through guidelines and credit risk committees. The ratings of our customers and their credit engagements represent the central element used in the approval, supervisory and control process in the area of credit and derivatives activities. This process involves analyzing and weighting the various creditworthiness characteristics of the customers and presenting the results in the form of rating scales. The forecasting quality, up-to-dateness and portfolio coverage of the rating methods used are controlled by periodic sampling and regular reports. In the past year, Dresdner Bank increased the number of rating classes from 8 to 16. The first six classes correspond to "investment grade," classes VII to XIV signify "non-investment grade." Rating classes XV and XVI are default classes according to the Basel II Definition. At the end of fiscal 2002, about 70 percent of all counterparty risks in the trading and banking portfolios of Dresdner Bank fell into rating classes I to VI. The volume of the overall portfolio is largely determined by the Bank's trading business, which involves primarily transactions with low default probability, typically with state and local agencies and financial services providers. Approximately 85 percent of the transactions with 209 public agencies or organizations are rated in the top risk class I. Approximately 60 percent of the transactions with financial services providers fall into risk classes III to V. These two segments represent 56 percent of the Bank's total portfolio. Counterparty risks are now centrally controlled by Dresdner Bank's Risk Management and Control Committee, which is headed by the Chief Risk Officer of Dresdner Bank. The newly created body is responsible for issuing the appropriate guidelines and standards for the risk strategy and risk control of the Dresdner Bank Group and for ensuring compliance. In addition, the committee decides on essential projects involving a credit risk. In this context, the Risk Management and Control Committee oversees the coordination between the risk management of the company's divisions and the Corporate Center Risk Control Unit. This is done in close cooperation with Allianz AG's Group Risk Controlling (Allianz Group Center). In addition, the committee is responsible for the monthly audit of the overall portfolio. This audit, which is performed in cooperation with the divisions, is controlled by Risk Controlling. Its purpose is to monitor credit risks on a continuing basis and to make sure that the management's credit risk strategy is adhered to. In the past year, we set up the IRU in the banking segment. The task of this unit is to free up risk capital through the reduction of risk-weighted assets by restructuring non-performing loans to strategic customers with the intent of returning such loans to the business units from which they originated, while maximizing the recovery from remaining non-performing loans, as well as non-strategic customer loans, through repayment, sale, hedging, securitization and other means. Loans to be bundled together in the IRU are primarily performing loans to non-strategic clients, such as small-capitalization clients in Latin America, Asia and the United States, as well as, to a lesser extent, loans to corporate and private clients that are currently non-performing. We account for the development of risks in the lending business by making allowances for individual risks and country risks. In setting up risk provisions, we consider the creditworthiness of the borrower, the general economic environment and risk-reducing measures, for example collateral. In 2002, total risk provisions in the banking business amounted to E7.6 billion. COUNTERPARTY RISK FROM TRADING ACTIVITIES. In the credit-sensitive trading business with OTC derivatives, the selection of counterparties plays a decisive role. The selection process is aimed at counterparties with top-quality credit ratings. In the derivatives portfolios of Dresdner Bank, 95 percent of the positive replacement values, which are essential for assessing counterparty risk, involve counterparties in risk classes I to VI as described above and are thus of "investment grade." To reduce the counterparty risk from trading activities, so-called cross-product netting master agreements with the business partners are set up. In the case of a defaulting counterparty, netting makes it possible to offset any claims and liabilities not yet due. COUNTRY RISKS. We control these risks by using internal country ratings. These ratings are based upon macroeconomic data and key qualitative indicators. The latter take into account the economic, social and political environment and focus on a country's ability to make payments in foreign currencies. At present, Dresdner Bank's country rating system includes eight risk groups. At the end of 2002, Dresdner Bank's country risk provisions totaled E367 million. MARKET RISK. Dresdner Bank uses a proprietary value-at-risk model that takes into account both general and specific risks. Value-at-risk is defined as the potential loss which may occur during a specific period of time and with a given confidence level. In 1998, the BaFin first approved Dresdner Bank's value-at-risk model for purposes of reporting in accordance with Principle I of the German Banking Act. It also approved the improvements made in 2001 and 2002. The value-at-risk data used to calculate capital adequacy requirements for regulatory purposes must take into account potential market movements within a confidence level of 99 percent, based on an assumed holding period of 10 trading days. 210 MARKET RISKS IN THE TRADING PORTFOLIO. The risks from Dresdner Bank's trading activities decreased in comparison to the previous year. This is mainly attributable to reduced holdings of interest-bearing instruments. To validate the quality of the value-at-risk model, Dresdner Bank performs regular backtests. For this purpose, the value-at-risk calculated on the basis of the current position is compared to the actual change in value on the following day. This shows whether the model used provided an adequate assessment of the risks. For purposes of setting internal limits and risk determination, Dresdner Bank calculates value-at-risk with a confidence level of 95 percent and a one-day holding period. Unlike the value-at-risk calculation required by the supervisory authority, which is based on market data from the past, Dresdner Bank thus assigns greater weight to the most recent market fluctuation. Dresdner Bank believes this ensures that value-at-risk data more accurately reflect current market developments. Value-at-risk (or VaR) is only one of the instruments used to characterize the risk profile of the Dresdner Bank Group. In addition, Dresdner Bank also uses operational risk indicators and limits, which are specifically adapted to the risk situation of the trading units. Trading is controlled by setting value-at-risk and operational market risk limits. Current limit utilization is determined and monitored by Risk Controlling on a daily basis. Limit breaches must be immediately indicated to the management concerned so that corrective action can be taken. The following table below shows the VaR for the trading portfolio of Dresdner Bank at and for the periods indicated (99% confidence level, 10-day holding period): AT 2002 ANNUAL STATISTICS AT DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------ DECEMBER 31, 2002 MEAN VALUE MAXIMUM MINIMUM 2001 ------------ ---------- ------- ------- ------------ (E IN MILLIONS) Aggregate risk.................... 81 120 167 35 147 Interest rate risk................ 65 101 147 65 124 Equity risk....................... 45 53 83 26 64 Currency/commodity risk........... 13 17 104 2 18 Diversification effect(1)......... (42) (51) -- -- (59) --------------- (1) No diversification effect can be taken into account since the maximum values were measured at different dates. MARKET RISKS IN THE NON-TRADING PORTFOLIO. This risk mainly comprises the risk of interest changes and is analyzed on the basis of sensitivity and value-at-risk indicators (99% confidence level, 10-day holding period). As in the case of trading, Dresdner Bank controls this risk by setting value-at-risk limits. The value-at-risk for interest rate risk in the banking portfolio of Dresdner Bank Group decreased 67% to E31.9 million at the end of the year. This indicator also takes into account portfolio effects. The reduction is mainly due to the deconsolidation of Deutsche Hyp. CURRENCY RISKS. Currency risks at Dresdner Bank are limited by applying the following principle: all loans and deposits in foreign currencies are refinanced or reinvested in the same currency with matching maturities. LIQUIDITY RISKS. As part of a Group liquidity policy, Treasury and Risk Control establishes principles for liquidity management. This policy must meet both regulatory requirements and internal standards. The liquidity risk limits include a reporting process for limit breaches and provisions for emergency planning. 211 Liquidity risk measurement is based on the liquidity management system. This system models the maturities of all cash flows and draws up a scenario-based liquidity balance sheet, taking into account available prime-rated securities. ORGANIZATIONAL RISK CONTROLLING. At the organizational level, risk management and risk controlling are strictly separated on the basis of the principle of dual control. Dresdner Bank's risk management sets the limits for the company's different activities that are exposed to risks. This is done in accordance with a general framework approved by the Management Board. RISK CONTROL IN ASSET MANAGEMENT Risk control in asset management is an integral part of the processes of the local units or the investment platform. The Corporate Center is responsible for ensuring that Group-wide standards for asset management are applied at the local level. The individual asset management companies continually monitor the portfolio risks of the customer assets they manage by using analytical tools specifically adapted to the risk profile of the product concerned. At the same time, the performance of the various product lines is periodically monitored and analyzed at the Group level. MARKET RISK MEASUREMENT SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS The Group uses a risk modeling technique known as "sensitivity analysis" to show the implications of changes in market conditions on the financial instruments it holds in its trading and non-trading portfolios. This enables us to make comparisons across our business segments. Sensitivity analysis measures the potential loss due to changes in fair values resulting from hypothetical changes in equity prices, interest rates and foreign currency rates at a given point in time. Sensitivity analysis generates values representing the risk inherent in each position under given market conditions. Due to the standardization of the sensitivity analysis in this risk assessment, diversification effects are not considered. ASSUMPTIONS In calculating equity price sensitivity, we assume a 20% decrease in stock prices. This assumption has been made in conformity with applicable German risk reporting standards. Estimates of interest rate risk sensitivity assume a 100 basis point increase in interest rates. If interest rates rise, the fair values of interest-sensitive instruments such as bonds, loans and mortgages may fall; the magnitude of this decrease depends on the maturity, coupon or other characteristics of a particular instrument. The table below shows the aggregate effect on the fair value of all of the Group's interest-sensitive investments, assuming a 100 basis point parallel shift that occurs simultaneously and instantaneously across all countries, markets and maturities. This assumption has also been made in conformity with applicable German risk reporting standards. Foreign exchange risk is calculated in a manner similar to equity price sensitivity, by assuming a 10% decrease in all non-euro currency exchange rates against the euro. Consequently, the aggregate fair value sensitivity shown in the table below illustrates the effect on fair values if, simultaneously and uniformly, all non-euro currencies lose 10% of their value relative to the euro. The Group believes that the scenarios used in sensitivity analysis represent reasonable assumptions based on past observations of market conditions. Although market fluctuations exceeding 20% or 100 basis points are possible, the Group believes that estimates based on these assumptions offer a fair view on the risk inherent in its positions. Although these 212 assumptions are intentionally simplified (for example, they assume static portfolios and do not take into account that market prices under normal conditions change neither simultaneously nor by the same magnitude), we believe they provide a useful framework for our risk management analysis and support our strategic decisions. LIMITATIONS While the Allianz Group believes that sensitivity analysis provides its managers with a valid estimation of market risk exposures, it recognizes that there are certain limitations to the use of this method. Price changes in a diversified portfolio have offsetting effects, since various assets revalue in directions or in magnitudes different to overall marketplace changes. This is known as the "diversification effect" of holding a portfolio consisting of different assets. Because sensitivity analysis uses a generalized methodology, the Group's risk estimates do not take this diversification effect into account. Actual changes in the fair value of the Group's assets could be different to those shown in the table below. Additionally, routine daily business activity entails a certain amount of change in the portfolios' composition as bonds mature or as portfolio managers buy or sell investments. As a result, the actual sensitivity of the Allianz Group's portfolio will vary at any particular moment in time, and the risk of loss from equity, interest rate, foreign exchange or other risks cannot be eliminated, although it can be quantified and monitored. Finally, the Group's sensitivity analyses are estimates based on a fixed point in the past. Nearly all of the Group's assets and liabilities are subject to market risk from fluctuating equity, interest and foreign exchange market values. These fluctuations cannot be foreseen and can occur suddenly. The quantitative risk measurements provided by the model and reflected in the table below are a snapshot, describing the potential losses to investments under a particular set of assumptions and parameters. Although these measurements reflect reasonable possibility, they may differ considerably from actual losses that may be experienced in the future. ALLIANZ GROUP MARKET RISK EXPOSURE ESTIMATES TRADING PORTFOLIOS The trading portfolios of the Group and resulting market risks relate primarily to our banking segment. In our worldwide trading activities we use financial derivatives both as non-standardized financial instruments for the individual management of market risks and as a component of structured financial transactions. We use derivatives to manage our proprietary trading portfolio. Our derivative trading activities focus on interest bearing financial instruments, predominately interest rate swaps. We also use currency and credit derivatives as well as equity/ index derivatives. INSURANCE OPERATIONS. Our insurance business does not generally engage in trading activities. With the adoption of IAS 39 (effective January 1, 2001), however, derivative instruments that do not meet IFRS hedge accounting standards are treated as trading derivatives. As a result of this new accounting rule, the trading portfolio tables below show significant impact from trading not only for our banking business but also for our insurance business. Derivatives used in our insurance operations, however, are principally used for portfolio hedging and not for trading purposes. BANKING OPERATIONS. Our banking segment is active in trading equities, interest rate instruments and foreign exchange and commodities. Our banking segment uses derivatives in its trading portfolios primarily to meet customer demand as well as to hedge market risk. Derivatives are also used to take advantage of market opportunities. In terms of volume, the primary derivative products we use are interest rate swaps, futures and options as well as foreign exchange swaps and equity related derivatives. 213 The primary exposures in foreign currencies are U.S. dollars and British pounds sterling. The following table shows the sensitivity analysis of the market risk in our material trading portfolio of the Allianz Group. Certain financial instruments are included in more than one risk category, because they may be affected by changes in more than one parameter. For example, equities denominated in non-euro currencies are affected by fluctuation in both stock prices and exchange rates. In 2000, prior to the adoption of IAS 39 and our acquisition of Dresdner Bank, all of our portfolios were considered non-trading. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT AND RISK CATEGORY: TRADING PORTFOLIOS (E IN MILLIONS) AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 --------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH ASSET INSURANCE INSURANCE BANKING(3) MANAGEMENT TOTAL --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----- Equity price risk(1).................. 200 500 -- -- 700 Interest rate risk.................... -- -- (100) -- (100) Foreign exchange risk(2).............. -- -- 100 -- 100 AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 --------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH ASSET INSURANCE INSURANCE BANKING(3) MANAGEMENT TOTAL --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----- Equity price risk(1).................. 300 (200) (200) -- (100) Interest rate risk.................... -- -- (400) -- (400) Foreign exchange risk(2).............. (100) 100 300 -- 300 --------------- (1) Amounts do not take into account the Allianz Group's unconsolidated subsidiaries, or affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises. (2) Amounts take into account financial instruments not denominated in euros. (3) Includes Dresdner Bank. NON-TRADING PORTFOLIOS Our remaining portfolios contain all non-trading activities of the banking segment, as well as the financial investments of the insurance segment. We hold and use many different financial instruments in managing our businesses. Grouped according to risk category, the following are the most significant assets according to their fair values: - equity price risk: common shares and preferred shares; - interest rate risk: bonds, loans and mortgages; and - foreign exchange rate risk: non-euro denominated equities and interest rate risk sensitive assets. INSURANCE SEGMENT. The insurance segment's non-trading portfolio is exposed to foreign exchange risk because some of its assets are denominated in currencies other than the euro. If non-euro foreign exchange rates decline against the euro, the fair values of the corresponding assets would also decline. The insurance segment's primary exposures for foreign exchange risk are for the U.S. dollar, Swiss franc and the Korean won. Local laws generally require that the insurance policy obligations of our subsidiaries and the investments covering them must be in the same currency. As a result, currency fluctuations in connection with foreign subsidiaries have only a minor impact on the insurance segment's risk management strategies. 214 The decline in the equity price risk in 2002 was due to the overall decline in stock prices. Most of our insurance-related equity investments are intended to be held for the long term. The equity holdings are primarily in the euro zone equity markets of Germany, France and Italy, with significant additional exposures in the U.S., Swiss and U.K. markets. The insurance segment is exposed to interest rate risk due to its investments in fixed-income instruments, in particular bonds, loans and mortgages. The primary exposures for interest rate sensitivity securities are for bonds, loans and mortgages held by our German, French, U.S., Italian and Swiss subsidiaries. BANKING SEGMENT. Our banking operations are subject to currency risk on all non-euro loans and deposits. For our non-trading activities, it is our policy that all loans and deposits in foreign currencies be funded and reinvested in the same currency and with matching maturities. Any residual currency risk in non-trading portfolios results primarily from developments in results of affiliated companies outside of the euro-zone during the year. The non-trading portfolio of the banking segment with respect to interest rate risk includes all loans and deposits, issued securities, interest rate-related investment securities as well as corresponding hedges of Dresdner Bank. Market risk associated with these positions is primarily interest rate risk resulting from long-term fixed rate loans, which are funded in part by short-term deposits. On the bank's non-trading books, interest rate derivatives are used to hedge risk associated with fixed rate loans. For this purpose, the bank primarily uses interest rate swaps. Futures and options are also used for asset and liability management in the non-trading activities, albeit to a significantly smaller degree. We also use swaptions to hedge risk arising from a borrower's prepayment options under some loan agreements. A small volume of equity derivatives is held due to investments in shares from affiliated and non-affiliated companies. Most of our equity investments are intended to be held for long term. Equity holdings in the banking segment are primarily in the German market. The following table shows a sensitivity analysis of the market risk in our material non-trading portfolios. Certain financial instruments are included in more than one risk category, because they may be affected by changes in more than one parameter. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT AND RISK CATEGORY: NON-TRADING PORTFOLIOS AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 ----------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH ASSET INSURANCE INSURANCE BANKING(3) MANAGEMENT TOTAL --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Equity price risk(1)............... (4,400) (5,200) (1,000) -- (10,600) Interest rate risk................. (2,500) (9,800) (400) (100) (12,800) Foreign exchange risk(2)........... (2,700) (3,800) -- -- (6,500) AT DECEMBER 31, 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY- CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH ASSET INSURANCE INSURANCE BANKING(3) MANAGEMENT TOTAL --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Equity price risk(1)............... (5,900) (7,600) (2,800) (100) (16,400) Interest rate risk................. (2,400) (8,500) (400) (200) (11,500) Foreign exchange risk(2)........... (2,600) (2,600) -- -- (5,200) --------------- (1) Amounts do not take into account unconsolidated subsidiaries of the Allianz Group, or affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises. (2) Amounts take into account financial instruments in foreign currency. (3) Includes Dresdner Bank. 215 OPERATIONAL RISKS OPERATIONAL RISKS. Operational risks are risks caused by inadequacies or faults in business processes or controls. These may be related to technical problems or employees, operational structures or external influences. We seek to minimize such risks by installing a comprehensive system of internal controls and security systems in each operating unit. Operational risks are limited by a wide range of technical and organizational measures such as redundant hardware configurations, communications equipment and systems, back-up computing facilities, and data backups to maintain IT capability in emergencies. In addition, procedures are in place for safeguarding the confidentiality and integrity of stored data and information. For this purpose, high-performance firewall systems were introduced to protect the IT network against external interference along with access authorization procedures, supervision and control processes. The principle of dual control is adhered to in the case of operating procedures. The purpose of these measures is to ensure and document an adequate standard for Group-internal processes. LEGAL RISKS. Legal risks result from contractual agreements or legal frameworks. They include risks from the adoption of new statutory regulations, disadvantageous amendments to existing legislation or regulations or prejudicial changes in their interpretation. Legal risks also take into account the possibility that contractual agreements may not be enforceable through legal action or court proceedings. The limitation of legal risks is an important task of our Legal Department. This is done, for example, by using internationally recognized standard documentation and, if necessary, by obtaining legal opinions. Contracts for established products are continuously reviewed to include any amendments required by changes in legislation or jurisdiction. In addition, our Legal Department assists Group companies in matters pertaining to business transactions and contractual negotiations to ensure compliance with minimum standards. It also supports the management and supervisory bodies of Allianz in meeting their statutory obligations. RISK MONITORING BY THIRD PARTIES Supervisory authorities and rating agencies are additional risk monitoring bodies. Supervisory authorities specify the minimum precautions that must be taken in individual countries and at the international level. Rating agencies determine the relationship between the required risk capital of a company and the available safeguards. In their evaluation of capital resources, the rating agencies include equity shown in the balance sheet, minority interests and other items representing additional securities in times of crisis. In addition to capital resources, the rating process also takes into account elements such as, the strategic position of the company in individual business areas and markets as well as its medium-term business prospects. 216 ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES Not applicable. 217 PART II ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES None. ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS None. ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES The Chairman of the Management Board (Chief Executive Officer) and the Member of the Management Board responsible for Group Controlling, Accounting, Taxation and Compliance (Chief Financial Officer), with the assistance of other members of management, performed an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rule 13a-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. No significant deficiencies and material weaknesses were identified that required corrective actions. ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT Not applicable. ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS Not applicable. ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Not applicable. 218 PART III ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Not applicable. ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS See pages F-1 forward for the consolidated financial statements required by this item. ITEM 19. EXHIBITS The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report: EXHIBIT NUMBER DOCUMENT ------- -------- 1.1 Articles of Association 4.1 Principles of Cooperation between Allianz AG and Munich Re, dated May 2000* 4.2 Letter of Intent between Allianz AG and Munich Re, dated May 4, 2000** 4.3 Agreement in Principle between Allianz AG and Munich Re, dated April 4, 2001*** 4.4 Basic Agreement between Allianz AG and Dresdner Bank, dated March 31, 2001**** 4.5 First Supplement to Principles of Cooperation between Allianz AG and Munich Re, dated December 2001 ***** 4.6 Second Supplement to Principles of Cooperation between Allianz AG and Munich Re, dated December 19, 2002 4.7 Third Supplement to Principles of Cooperation between Allianz AG and Munich Re, dated March 20, 2003 8.1 List of subsidiaries --------------- * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 20-F (File No. 1-15154). ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 20-F (File No. 1-15154). *** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2000. **** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2000. ***** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001. 219 ALLIANZ GROUP INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES PAGE ---- Independent Auditors' Report................................ F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001...................................................... F-3 Consolidated Income Statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002................. F-4 Consolidated Statements of Movements in Shareholders' Equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002......................................... F-5 Consolidated Cash Flow Statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002............. F-6 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements: Business Segment Information: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001.................................................. F-8 Consolidated Income Statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002......... F-10 Insurance.............................................. F-12 Banking................................................ F-14 Accounting Regulations.................................... F-15 Changes to the Accounting, Valuation and Reporting Policies............................................... F-15 Consolidation............................................. F-16 Accounting and Valuation Policies......................... F-19 Supplementary Information on Group Assets................. F-35 Supplementary Information on Group Liabilities and Equity................................................. F-52 Supplementary Information on the Consolidated Income Statement.............................................. F-72 Other Information......................................... F-106 Summary of Significant Differences between the Accounting Principles used in the Preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America..... F-112 Selected subsidiaries and other holdings.................. F-130 Schedules: Schedule I Summary of Investments......................... S-1 Schedule II Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant............................................. S-3 Schedule III Supplementary Insurance Information.......... S-6 Schedule IV Supplementary Reinsurance Information......... S-8 Schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts excluded as account balances are not material. F-1 [KPMG Logo] INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Management Board and Supervisory Board of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft and its subsidiaries (collectively, "the Allianz Group") as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, movements in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements we have also audited the accompanying financial statement schedules. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of Allianz Group's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Allianz Group as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. International Financial Reporting Standards vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). Application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America would have affected results of operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 to the extent summarized in Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements. /s/ KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft Munich, Germany July 11, 2003 F-2 ALLIANZ GROUP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001 2002 2001 NOTE E(MN) E(MN) ---- ------- ------- ASSETS A. Intangible assets....................................... 5 18,273 16,911 B. Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises............................ 6 11,345 10,247 C. Investments............................................. 7 285,340 345,302 D. Investments held on account and at risk of life insurance policyholders............................... 25,657 24,692 E. Loans and advances to banks............................. 8 86,822 61,274 F. Loans and advances to customers......................... 8 188,084 239,693 G. Trading assets.......................................... 9 124,842 128,422 H. Cash and cash equivalents............................... 10 21,008 21,240 I. Amounts ceded to reinsurers from insurance reserves.... 11 28,420 30,999 J. Deferred tax assets..................................... 37 13,258 8,415 K. Other assets............................................ 12 49,007 55,730 ------- ------- Total assets................................. 852,056 942,925 ======= ======= EQUITY AND LIABILITIES A. Shareholders' equity.................................... 13 21,772 31,664 B. Minority interests in shareholders' equity.............. 14 8,165 17,349 C. Participation certificates and subordinated liabilities........................................... 15 14,174 12,207 D. Insurance reserves...................................... 16 305,763 299,512 E. Insurance reserves for life insurance where the investment risk is carried by policyholders........... 25,687 24,726 F. Liabilities to banks.................................... 17 137,332 135,402 G. Liabilities to customers................................ 18 147,266 177,323 H. Certificated liabilities................................ 19 78,750 134,670 I. Trading liabilities.................................... 20 53,520 44,538 J. Other accrued liabilities............................... 21 13,069 14,117 K. Other liabilities....................................... 22 31,360 37,236 L. Deferred tax liabilities................................ 37 12,188 8,898 M. Deferred income......................................... 23 3,010 5,283 ------- ------- Total equity and liabilities................. 852,056 942,925 ======= ======= See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-3 ALLIANZ GROUP CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 2002 2001 2000 NOTE E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ---- ------- ------- ------- 1. Premiums earned (net).............................. 24 55,133 52,745 49,907 2. Interest and similar income........................ 25 28,210 24,224 16,595 3. Income (net) from investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises..................................... 26 4,398 1,588 1,860 4. Other income from investments...................... 27 9,355 8,502 10,945 5. Trading income..................................... 28 1,507 1,592 (36) 6. Fee and commission income, and income from service activities...................................... 29 6,102 4,827 2,187 7. Other income 30 2,971 2,172 2,331 ------- ------- ------- Total income (1. to 7.)................. 107,676 95,650 83,789 ------- ------- ------- 8. Insurance benefits (net)........................... 31 50,229 50,154 51,738 9. Interest and similar expenses...................... 32 10,651 7,861 2,399 10. Other expenses for investments..................... 33 14,102 8,923 4,949 11. Loan loss provisions............................... 34 2,241 596 21 12. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses...... 35 24,407 19,324 13,679 13. Amortization of goodwill........................... 5 1,162 808 495 14. Other expenses..................................... 36 6,098 6,157 5,595 ------- ------- ------- Total expenses (8. to 14.).............. 108,890 93,823 78,876 ------- ------- ------- 15. Earnings from ordinary activities before taxes..... (1,214) 1,827 4,913 16. Taxes (benefit).................................... 37 (735) (840) 176 17. Minority interests in earnings..................... 14 688 1,044 1,277 ------- ------- ------- 18. Net income......................................... (1,167) 1,623 3,460 ======= ======= ======= E E E ------- ------- ------- Basic earnings per share.......................... 44 (4.81) 6.66 14.10 ======= ======= ======= Diluted earnings per share........................ 44 (4.81) 6.66 14.10 ======= ======= ======= See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-4 ALLIANZ GROUP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MOVEMENTS IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 UNREALIZED GAINS CONSOLIDATED PAID-IN REVENUE AND UNAPPROPRIATED SHAREHOLDERS' CAPITAL RESERVES LOSSES (NET) PROFIT EQUITY E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ------- -------- ------------ -------------- -------------- Beginning balance January 1, 2000..... 7,811 9,884 11,626 355 29,676 Currency translation adjustments...... -- 374 77 -- 451 Changes in the group of consolidated companies........................... -- 283 -- -- 283 Capital paid in....................... 183 -- -- -- 183 Unrealized investment gains and losses.............................. -- -- 1,745 -- 1,745 Net income for the year............... -- 3,027 -- 433 3,460 Shareholders' dividend................ -- -- -- (306) (306) Miscellaneous......................... -- 160 -- (49) 111 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Balance as of December 31, 2000....... 7,994 13,728 13,448 433 35,603 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Currency translation adjustments...... -- (127) 38 -- (89) Changes in the group of consolidated companies........................... -- (554) -- -- (554) Capital paid in....................... 6,775 -- -- -- 6,775 Treasury stock........................ -- (5,801) -- -- (5,801) Unrealized investment gains and losses.............................. -- -- (5,210) -- (5,210) Net income for the year............... -- 1,213 -- 410 1,623 Shareholders' dividend................ -- -- -- (367) (367) Miscellaneous......................... -- (250) -- (66) (316) ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Balance as of December 31, 2001....... 14,769 8,209 8,276 410 31,664 ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Currency translation adjustments...... -- (1,232) (29) -- (1,261) Changes in the group of consolidated companies........................... -- 364 -- -- 364 Capital paid in....................... 16 -- -- -- 16 Treasury stock........................ -- (157) -- -- (157) Unrealized investment gains and losses.............................. -- -- (7,198) -- (7,198) Net income for the year............... -- (2,332) -- 1,165 (1,167) Shareholders' dividend................ -- -- -- (364) (364) Miscellaneous......................... -- (79) -- (46) (125) ------ ------ ------ ----- ------ Balance as of December 31, 2002....... 14,785 4,773 1,049 1,165 21,772 ====== ====== ====== ===== ====== See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-5 ALLIANZ GROUP CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ------- ------- ------- Operating activities Net income for the year..................................... (1,167) 1,623 3,460 Change in unearned premiums................................. 542 949 (674) Change in aggregate policy reserves (without aggregate policy reserves for life insurance products in accordance with SFAS 97)............................................. 6,039 6,859 6,550 Change in reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses..... 2,530 3,375 2,715 Change in other insurance reserves (without change in the reserve for latent premium refunds from unrealized investment gains and losses).............................. (4,241) (4,007) 2,227 Change in deferred acquisition costs........................ (1,211) (662) (1,093) Change in funds held by others under reinsurance business assumed................................................... 1,349 (171) 66 Change in funds held under reinsurance business ceded....... (192) (278) 483 Change in accounts receivable/payable on reinsurance business.................................................. 232 (4) (604) Change in trading securities (including trading liabilities).............................................. 14,064 (12,544) 46 Change in loans and advances to banks and customers......... (5,846) 3,442 (3,694) Change in liabilities to banks and customers................ (8,215) (5,456) 836 Change in certificated liabilities.......................... (1,727) 3,130 2,642 Change in other receivables and liabilities................. (1,399) 3,843 (1,408) Change in deferred tax assets/liabilities (without change in deferred tax assets/liabilities from unrealized investment gains and losses)......................................... (1,295) (2,181) (2,226) Adjustment for investment income/expenses not involving movements of cash......................................... 175 112 (7,525) Adjustments to reconcile amortization of goodwill........... 1,162 808 495 Other....................................................... (1,470) 387 180 ------- ------- ------- Net cash flow (used in) provided by operating activities:... (670) (775) 2,476 ------- ------- ------- Investing activities Change in securities available for sale..................... (7,073) (3,465) (7,271) Change in investments held to maturity...................... 1,092 383 634 Change in real estate....................................... 2,226 112 (287) Change in other investments................................. 1,681 2,692 (416) Change in cash and cash equivalents from the acquisition of consolidated affiliated companies......................... (10,787) 12,114 (3,054) Other....................................................... (919) (441) (1,389) ------- ------- ------- Net cash flow (used in) provided by investing activities:... (13,780) 11,395 (11,783) ------- ------- ------- Financing activities Change in participation certificates and subordinated liabilities............................................... 2,784 (770) 1,714 Change in investments held on account and at risk of life insurance policyholders................................... (2,154) (1,465) (1,942) Change in aggregate policy reserves for life insurance products according to SFAS 97............................. 10,808 8,089 6,770 Cash inflow from capital increases.......................... 16 275 184 Dividend payouts............................................ (682) (673) (613) Other from shareholders' capital and minority interests (without change in revenue reserve from unrealized investment gains and losses).............................. 3,555 937 3,464 ------- ------- ------- Net cash flow provided by financing activities.............. 14,327 6,393 9,577 ------- ------- ------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents............................................... (109) 18 9 ------- ------- ------- Change in cash and cash equivalents......................... (232) 17,031 279 ------- ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period............ 21,240 4,209 3,930 ------- ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.................. 21,008 21,240 4,209 ======= ======= ======= See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. F-6 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] F-7 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION -- CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001 PROPERTY- CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH BANKING ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ASSETS A. Intangible assets....................... 2,960 2,943 4,817 4,005 3,509 3,183 B. Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises........................... 51,448 40,387 6,183 6,043 4,349 2,079 C. Investments............................. 76,855 91,712 189,172 180,076 28,965 85,133 D. Investments held on account and at risk of life insurance policyholders....... -- -- 25,657 24,692 -- -- E. Loans and advances to banks............. 5,219 5,079 3,490 1,010 76,748 54,271 F. Loans and advances to customers......... 2,882 2,837 24,747 24,843 168,919 222,916 G. Trading assets.......................... 1,404 1,373 1,177 775 122,139 125,741 H. Cash and cash equivalents............... 2,880 2,617 2,267 2,351 16,322 16,244 I. Amounts ceded to reinsurers from insurance reserves.................... 17,188 19,209 17,623 17,927 -- -- J. Deferred tax assets..................... 7,410 5,060 2,601 1,911 3,161 1,350 K. Other assets............................ 21,482 22,840 17,320 17,634 15,416 14,977 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total segment assets.............. 189,728 194,057 295,054 281,267 439,528 525,894 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= EQUITY AND LIABILITIES A. Participation certificates and subordinated liabilities.............. 4,342 573 -- -- 9,846 11,757 B. Insurance reserves...................... 87,557 90,432 224,673 215,217 -- -- C. Insurance reserves for life insurance where the investment risk is carried by Policyholders...................... -- -- 25,687 24,726 -- -- D. Liabilities to banks.................... 5,166 6,303 1,708 2,143 130,568 131,454 E. Liabilities to customers................ -- -- -- -- 146,945 175,228 F. Certificated liabilities................ 19,031 14,727 263 229 64,569 122,713 G. Trading liabilities..................... 544 448 825 50 52,152 44,052 H. Other accrued liabilities............... 5,626 5,387 850 967 5,984 7,130 I. Other liabilities....................... 18,312 21,624 20,555 19,963 5,468 4,134 J. Deferred tax liabilities................ 7,356 5,920 2,551 1,958 2,220 980 K. Deferred income......................... 104 84 354 406 2,545 4,793 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total segment liabilities......... 148,038 145,498 277,466 265,659 420,297 502,241 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Shareholders' equity and minority interests........................................................ Total equity and liabilities................................................................. F-8 ASSET CONSOLIDATION MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS GROUP ---------------- ------------------ ------------------ 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6,987 6,780 -- -- 18,273 16,911 20 116 (50,655) (38,378) 11,345 10,247 993 1,362 (10,645) (12,981) 285,340 345,302 -- -- -- -- 25,657 24,692 1,863 1,646 (498) (732) 86,822 61,274 228 561 (8,692) (11,464) 188,084 239,693 156 539 (34) (6) 124,842 128,422 940 550 (1,401) (522) 21,008 21,240 -- -- (6,391) (6,137) 28,420 30,999 86 94 -- -- 13,258 8,415 3,672 2,589 (8,883) (2,310) 49,007 55,730 ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- 14,945 14,237 (87,199) (72,530) 852,056 942,925 ====== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= -- 22 (14) (145) 14,174 12,207 -- -- (6,467) (6,137) 305,763 299,512 -- -- -- -- 25,687 24,726 177 1,554 (287) (6,052) 137,332 135,402 2,754 2,981 (2,433) (886) 147,266 177,323 435 435 (5,548) (3,434) 78,750 134,670 -- 2 (1) (14) 53,520 44,538 609 633 -- -- 13,069 14,117 1,239 1,413 (14,214) (9,898) 31,360 37,236 61 40 -- -- 12,188 8,898 7 -- -- -- 3,010 5,283 ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- 5,282 7,080 (28,964) (26,566) 822,119 893,912 ====== ====== ======= ======= ======= ======= 29,937 49,013 ======= ======= 852,056 942,925 ======= ======= F-9 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION -- CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 PROPERTY/CASUALTY LIFE/HEALTH BANKING ------------------------ ------------------------ ----------------------- 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1. Premiums earned (net)..... 36,458 34,428 31,529 18,675 18,317 18,378 -- -- -- 2. Interest and similar income.................... 4,473 5,068 5,568 11,215 10,765 10,152 13,336 9,085 1,502 3. Income (net) from affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises.... 8,494 889 1,833 445 525 693 2,071 1,016 122 4. Other income from investments............... 3,652 4,307 4,259 4,932 3,562 6,667 1,430 628 25 5. Trading income............ 207 1,451 (10) 244 (117) (49) 1,081 244 7 6. Fee and commission income, and income from service activities................ 521 1,425 940 200 268 271 2,925 1,474 2 7. Other income.............. 1,751 1,202 1,078 825 772 1,139 432 308 64 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total income (1. to 7.)........... 55,556 48,770 45,197 36,536 34,092 37,251 21,275 12,755 1,722 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- 8. Insurance benefits (net)..................... 28,974 28,200 25,413 21,284 21,979 26,354 -- -- -- 9. Interest and similar expenses.................. 1,564 1,323 1,136 434 492 148 9,509 6,766 1,257 10. Other expenses for investments............... 3,567 2,888 1,913 8,656 5,537 3,004 2,225 465 33 11. Loan loss provisions...... 7 4 -- 10 4 -- 2,222 588 21 12. Acquisition costs and administrative expenses... 10,521 10,042 9,106 4,263 4,259 3,927 7,581 3,446 170 13. Amortization of goodwill.................. 370 349 277 174 146 137 241 70 (8) 14. Other expenses............ 2,999 3,555 3,453 1,806 1,263 2,055 1,034 1,193 125 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- Total expenses (8. to 14.).......... 48,002 46,361 41,298 36,627 33,680 35,625 22,812 12,528 1,598 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- 15. Earnings from ordinary activities before taxes... 7,554 2,409 3,899 (91) 412 1,626 (1,537) 227 124 16. Taxes (benefit)........... (469) (701) (5) 67 99 343 (154) (6) (67) 17. Minority interests in earnings.................. 816 746 642 (177) 84 658 (25) 453 90 ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- 18. Net income................ 7,207 2,364 3,262 19 229 625 (1,358) (220) 101 ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ===== F-10 ASSET MANAGEMENT CONSOLIDATION ADJUSTMENTS GROUP --------------------- --------------------------- ------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -- -- -- -- -- -- 55,133 52,745 49,907 119 129 204 (933) (823) (831) 28,210 24,224 16,595 (12) (3) 1 (6,600) (839) (789) 4,398 1,588 1,860 35 44 18 (694) (39) (24) 9,355 8,502 10,945 (1) 10 16 (24) 4 -- 1,507 1,592 (36) 2,918 2,479 1,420 (462) (819) (446) 6,102 4,827 2,187 126 79 63 (163) (189) (13) 2,971 2,172 2,331 ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ 3,185 2,738 1,722 (8,876) (2,705) (2,103) 107,676 95,650 83,789 ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ -- -- -- (29) (25) (29) 50,229 50,154 51,738 89 82 61 (945) (802) (203) 10,651 7,861 2,399 22 57 -- (368) (24) (1) 14,102 8,923 4,949 2 -- -- -- -- -- 2,241 596 21 2,378 1,895 484 (336) (318) (8) 24,407 19,324 13,679 377 243 89 -- -- -- 1,162 808 495 551 795 1,043 (292) (649) (1,081) 6,098 6,157 5,595 ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ 3,419 3,072 1,677 (1,970) (1,818) (1,322) 108,890 93,823 78,876 ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ (234) (334) 45 (6,906) (887) (781) (1,214) 1,827 4,913 (59) (168) (4) (120) (64) (91) (735) (840) 176 230 182 136 (156) (421) (249) 688 1,044 1,277 ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ (405) (348) (87) (6,630) (402) (441) (1,167) 1,623 3,460 ===== ===== ===== ====== ====== ====== ======= ====== ====== F-11 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION -- INSURANCE DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 NET EXPENSE PREMIUMS EARNED (NET) RATIO(1) ---------------------- ---------------- 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) % % % ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- PROPERTY/CASUALTY 1. Europe Germany(4)......................................... 10,265 10,035 9,617 28.3 26.9 24.2 France(4).......................................... 4,066 3,746 3,644 26.4 30.0 28.1 Great Britain...................................... 1,875 1,765 1,604 30.0 31.0 33.4 Italy.............................................. 4,490 4,181 3,956 22.7 22.5 21.6 Switzerland........................................ 1,611 1,599 1,514 23.8 26.9 30.9 Spain.............................................. 1,171 1,027 915 20.6 21.2 23.8 2. America NAFTA Region....................................... 4,689 5,177 4,173 32.9 29.2 29.6 South America...................................... 494 610 653 34.8 39.7 34.8 3. Asia-Pacific Region............................................. 1,134 768 553 24.8 27.3 23.0 4. Specialty Lines Allianz Global Risks Ruckversicherungs AG............................. 559 -- -- 41.7 -- -- Credit............................................. 857 901 932 34.2 44.0 35.9.. Travel and Assistance.............................. 740 669 608 32.5 33.4 36.5 Allianz Marine & Aviation.......................... 578 450 256 21.1 22.5 29.8 5. Other................................................ 3,929 3,500 3,104 24.2 25.8 28.6 6. Consolidation adjustments(3)......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- ------ ------ ------ Total................................................ 36,458 34,428 31,529 ====== ====== ====== NET EXPENSE PREMIUMS EARNED (NET) RATIO(1) -------------------------- ---------------- 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) % % % ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- LIFE/HEALTH 1. Europe Germany.......................................... 11,044 10,545 10,500 10.0 12.7 10.7 France........................................... 1,449 1,515 2,283 52.5 52.0 27.6 Italy............................................ 1,219 1,247 1,339 31.3 22.5 14.8 Switzerland...................................... 624 557 477 23.1 22.6 9.9 Spain............................................ 493 873 525 7.3 4.2 8.9 2. USA................................................ 924 1,068 1,092 47.0 49.2 48.2 3. Asia-Pacific....................................... 1,605 1,202 937 19.0 17.6 19.6 4. Other.............................................. 1,317 1,310 1,225 33.9 30.5 34.7 5. Consolidation adjustments(3)....................... -- -- -- -- -- -- ------ -------- -------- Total............................................ 18,675 18,317 18,378 ====== ======== ======== --------------- (1) The net expense ratio represents net underwriting costs as a percentage of net premiums earned. (2) The net loss ratio represents net loss and loss adjustment expenses as a percentage of net premiums earned. (3) Represents elimination of intercompany transactions between Group companies in different geographical regions. (4) The 2001 and 2000 figures have been restated to reflect the reorganization of the Group's marine, aviation and industrial transport insurance into Allianz Marine & Aviation, a new specialty line. F-12 NET INCOME (LOSS) INVESTMENTS NET LOSS RATIO(2) ----------------------- --------------- ------------------ 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) % % % ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- 8,917 3,243 3,008 30,347 41,400 74.2 75.2 73.5 129 (62) 187 8,771 8,540 84.5 82.3 86.1 233 68 21 2,617 2,865 68.1 73.2 82.7 524 318 144 8,780 8,417 74.8 76.7 77.8 26 81 121 3,438 4,098 70.3 79.1 71.3 36 18 38 1,398 1,387 77.0 78.7 81.1 (964) (1,064) (117) 9,878 12,595 94.6 99.9 87.9 24 12 (24) 337 479 67.0 63.7 70.9 (62) (25) 17 1,829 1,520 78.5 79.9 83.1 (257) -- -- 1 -- 100.8 -- -- 33 70 131 2,000 2,118 72.1 68.0 46.6 4 (8) 6 269 237 62.0 64.4 63.2 17 (54) (4) 1,011 920 75.2 108.1 78.4 360 219 427 6,351 7,263 77.7 86.0 81.5 (1,813) (452) (693) (172) (127) -- -- -- ------ ------ ----- ------ ------ 7,207 2,364 3,262 76,855 91,712 ====== ====== ===== ====== ====== NET INCOME (LOSS) INVESTMENTS --------------------- ----------------- 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 96 63 339 97,030 93,316 (10) 132 127 38,282 39,319 152 133 158 16,630 14,171 (59) (20) 14 6,851 7,042 13 12 38 3,342 3,176 (40) (46) 112 13,693 10,415 (40) (32) (184) 4,046 3,296 (90) (13) 33 9,476 9,572 (3) -- (12) (178) (231) --- ---- ---- ------- ------- 19 229 625 189,172 180,076 === ==== ==== ======= ======= F-13 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION -- BANKING DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 LOAN LOSS EARNINGS AFTER NET REVENUE(1) PROVISIONS TOTAL EXPENSES TAXES(2) ---------------- -------------- ---------------- ----------------- 2002 2001(3) 2002 2001 2002 2001(3) 2002 2001(3) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ------- Private and business clients(4)..... 3,227 1,678 561 233 3,093 1,605 (304) (160) Corporates & Markets(4)............. 3,598 1,725 1,592 361 3,808 2,161 (1,642) (797) NET REVENUE(1) EARNINGS AFTER TAXES(2) ------------------------- ------------------------ 2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000 E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ----- Germany................................................... 7,059 6,227 70 1,858 1,931 2 Europe (excluding Germany)................................ 1,177 1,451 331 (999) (434) 166 NAFTA..................................................... 755 572 -- (1,527) (218) -- Rest of world............................................. 206 245 31 (474) (106) 15 ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ----- Subtotal.................................................. 9,197 8,495 432 (1,142) 1,173 183 ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ----- Consolidation Adjustments(5).............................. (23) (3,231) -- -- (870) -- ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ----- Total............................................. 9,174 5,264 432 (1,142) 303 183 ====== ====== ===== ====== ===== ===== --------------- (1) Consists of total income (less interest and similar expenses, other expenses for investments, fee and commission expenses, and other investment-related expenses). (2) Earnings after taxes represent income before goodwill amortization and minority interest. (3) When comparing the figures for fiscal year 2002 with those for 2001 and 2000, it should be noted that Dresdner Bank was consolidated as of July 23, 2001. Changes in the divisional structure and reclassifications have been taken into account in the prior-year figures stated. (4) Amounts in 2001 have been restated to reflect integration effective January 1, 2002 of the Group's small business operations, which the Allianz Group had previously included as part of its Corporates & Markets division, with the Group's former Private Clients division to form its new Private and Business Clients division. (5) Represents elimination of intercompany transactions between Group companies in different geographical regions. F-14 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000 (1) ACCOUNTING REGULATIONS Allianz Aktiengesellschaft ("Allianz AG" or "the Company") and its subsidiaries (collectively, "the Allianz Group" or "the Group") have global property and casualty insurance, life and health insurance, banking and asset management operations in more than 70 countries, with the largest of their operations in Europe. The Group's headquarters are located in Munich, Germany. The consolidated financial statements of the Allianz Group have been prepared in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), in accordance with sec.292a of the German Commercial Code (HGB). Since 2002, the designation IFRS applies to the overall framework of all standards approved by the International Accounting Standards Board. Already approved standards continue to be cited as International Accounting Standards (IAS). All standards currently in force for the years under review have been adopted in the presentation of the consolidated financial statements. IFRS do not provide specific guidance concerning the reporting of insurance transactions in annual financial statements. In such cases, as envisioned in the IFRS Framework, the provisions embodied under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) have been applied. The consolidated financial statements have been translated into English from those published in German and include additional disclosures required by US GAAP and by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Significant differences between IAS and US GAAP affecting the Group's consolidated net income and shareholders' equity have been summarized in Note 45. Condensed consolidated balance sheet and income statement information reflecting the impact of differences between IAS and US GAAP are also presented in Note 45. The financial statements have been prepared in euros (E). (2) CHANGES TO THE ACCOUNTING, VALUATION AND REPORTING POLICIES The following IAS accounting principles were applied for the first time in fiscal year 2001: IAS 39 -- Financial Instruments: recognition and measurement and IAS 40 -- Investment property. IAS 39 sets forth requirements for the recognition in financial statements and valuation of financial assets and liabilities of an enterprise, including the reporting of hedging instruments, as well as requirements for additional disclosure. Under this standard all financial assets and liabilities, including all derivatives, are initially recognized on the balance sheet at cost. Subsequent to initial recognition, all financial assets are remeasured to fair value, with the exception of certain assets and liabilities listed in the standard. IAS 39 does not apply to rights and obligations arising under insurance contracts. The effects of the first time application of IAS 39 on January 1, 2001 resulted in a reduction in revenue reserves of E153 million. This amount is included as a miscellaneous reduction of revenue reserves shown in the Consolidated Statements of Movements in Shareholders' Equity. IAS 40 covers investment property independent of the main activity of the enterprise concerned. Investment property is real estate held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation. IAS 40 does not apply to real estate held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes. IAS 40 allows an enterprise to choose either a fair value model or a cost model for valuation purposes. The Group has chosen the acquisition cost model which is consistent with its previous accounting policy. First time application of IAS 40 in 2001 resulted only in changes in presentation. F-15 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) For reasons of comparability with the current reporting year, some prior-year figures were adjusted in the balance sheet and the income statement through reclassifications that do not affect net income or shareholders' equity. (3) CONSOLIDATION SCOPE OF THE CONSOLIDATION In addition to Allianz AG, 213 (2001: 163 and 2000: 104) German and 1,045 (2001: 1,021 and 2000: 660) foreign enterprises have been consolidated in full. In addition, 74 (2001: 73 and 2000: 59) German and 79 (2001: 85 and 2000: 79) foreign investment funds were consolidated. Of the entities that have been consolidated in full, 12 (2001: 19 and 2000: 14) subsidiaries have been consolidated where Allianz AG owns less than majority of the voting power of the subsidiary, including CreditRas Vita S.p.A. and Antoniana Popolare Veneta Vita S.p.A., in all periods presented. Allianz AG exercises control over these entities by its ability to govern the financial and operating policies of the enterprise through management agreements, as further discussed in Note 44 under "Other information". A majority interest in Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG and Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG, which were already fully consolidated, was acquired in 2002. There are 12 (2001: 13 and 2000: 9) joint ventures that have been accounted for using the equity method; each of these enterprises is managed by Allianz AG together with a third party not included in the consolidated financial statements. There are 198 (2001: 146 and 2000: 95) associated enterprises that have been accounted for using the equity method. Certain enterprises have not been included in the consolidation or accounted for using the equity method, in cases where their value is not material to the presentation of the financial statements as a whole. All affiliated companies, joint ventures, and associated companies that are included in or excluded from the consolidated financial statements are individually listed in the disclosure of equity investments filed with the Commercial Register in Munich. All private companies are also listed and identified separately in this disclosure of equity investments, for which the consolidated financial statements and the Group management report are exempt in accordance with the application of sec.264 b of the German Commercial Code (HGB). Selected affiliated and associated enterprises are listed in Note 46. ACQUISITIONS The following are the significant companies consolidated for the first-time for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000: EFFECTS ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN YEAR OF ACQUISITION(1) ---------------------------------------------- DATE OF GROSS NET AMORTIZATION FIRST-TIME PREMIUMS INCOME GOODWILL(2) OF GOODWILL PRINCIPAL NEW ACQUISITIONS CONSOLIDATION E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) -------------------------- ------------- -------- ------ ----------- ------------ 2002 Slovenska poist' ovna a. s., Bratislava......... July 22, 2002 125 (8) 138 (7) F-16 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) EFFECTS ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN YEAR OF ACQUISITION(1) ---------------------------------------------- DATE OF GROSS NET AMORTIZATION FIRST-TIME PREMIUMS INCOME GOODWILL(2) OF GOODWILL PRINCIPAL NEW ACQUISITIONS CONSOLIDATION E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) E(MN) -------------------------- ------------- -------- ------ ----------- ------------ 2001 Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt/Main......... July 23, 2001 -- (300) 3,977 (108) Nicholas-Applegate, San Diego.................. January 31, 2001 -- (29) 1,042 (47) 2000 PIMCO Advisors L.P., Delaware............... May 5, 2000 -- (37) 2,674 (88) Allianz-Tiriac Asigurari, Bucharest.............. October 1, 2000 18 1 10 -- Arab International Insurance Company, Cairo.................. January 1, 2000 12 -- -- -- Munchener und Magdeburger Hagelversicherung AG, Munich................. July 1, 2000 19 (1) 1 -- Zwolsche Algemeene Holding, Nieuwegein.... December 31, 2000 -- -- 153 -- -------------------- (1) Consolidated in the business segments. (2) On the date of first-time consolidation. 2002 ACQUISITIONS: - Slovenska poist'ovna a. s., Bratislava: On July 22, 2002, Allianz Group acquired 66.8% of Slovenska poist'ovna a. s. at a purchase price of E142 million. Slovenska poist'ovna operates in both the property-casualty and the life/health insurance business segments. An additional 25.8% and 6.5% interests were acquired on July 29, 2002 and December 20, 2002 respectively. The total acquisition cost for the 99.1% interest in Slovenska poist'ovna amounted to E216 million. - Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG, Stuttgart: On January 15, 2002, the Allianz Group increased its interest in Allianz Lebensversicherungs-AG by 40.5% to 91.0% and resulted in additional goodwill of E633 million. The acquisition cost for the additional interest was E2,587 million. - Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG, Frankfurt/Main: On June 28, 2002, the Allianz Group increased its interest in Frankfurter Versicherungs-AG by 50.0% to 100.0% and resulted in additional goodwill of E57 million. The acquisition cost for the additional interest was E930 million. - Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG, Munich: On June 28, 2002, the Allianz Group increased its interest in Bayerische Versicherungsbank AG by 45.0% to 90.0% and resulted in additional goodwill of E94 million. The acquisition cost for the additional interest was E858 million. F-17 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) - Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt/Main: On January 15, 2002, June 28, 2002, July 2, 2002 and August 23, 2002, the Allianz Group increased its interest in Dresdner Bank AG by 21.5% to 100.0% which resulted in additional goodwill of E2,002 million. The acquisition cost for the additional interest totaled E6,338 million. 2001 ACQUISITIONS: - Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt/Main and its subsidiaries: On July 23, 2001, Allianz Group acquired 56.7% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Dresdner Bank AG, and its subsidiaries (Dresdner Bank) for a price of E17,277 million. Between July 23, 2001, and December 31, 2001, Allianz Group purchased an additional 1.0% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Dresdner Bank for E418 million. Prior to the July 23, 2001 acquisition, Allianz Group held an equity interest of 20.8% in Dresdner Bank, and accounted for it under the equity method. Total acquisition costs to obtain the majority holding of 78.5% as of December 31, 2001 amounted to E19,561 million. The transaction included the issuance of 19,972,339 shares of Allianz AG common stock valued at E6,596 million. Allianz AG accounted for its 2001 acquisitions of 57.7% of Dresdner Bank under the purchase method of accounting. The value of Allianz AG shares issued in connection with the acquisition was based on the share price as of the last trading date prior to the public announcement of the Group's acquisition of Dresdner. This value is representative of the contractually fixed terms related to the acquisition of outstanding shares and registration of new shares which were issued in exchange for Dresdner shares. If the share price as of the date of the physical exchange of shares had been considered to record the value of the shares issued, the Group would have recorded E301 million less goodwill. Additionally, goodwill amortization for 2002 and 2001 would have been lower by E20 million and E9 million, respectively. The results of operations of Dresdner Bank are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Allianz Group since July 23, 2001. Dresdner Bank is among the leading banks in the European banking market with a wide range of private, commercial and investment banking products and services for corporate, governmental and individual customers. As a result of the acquisition, the Group will seek to generate significant income opportunities and cost synergies over the coming years with regard to integration and associated strategic realignment in the German financial services market. - Nicholas-Applegate, San Diego: On January 31, 2001, the Allianz Group acquired 100% of this U.S. asset management holding company at a purchase price of E1,111 million. The transaction also included performance-related purchase price payments of up to E1,236 million and incentive and retention schemes amounting to a maximum of E170 million. 2000 ACQUISITIONS: - PIMCO Advisors L.P., Delaware: On May 5, 2000, the Allianz Group acquired 69.5% of the ownership interests in PIMCO Advisors L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. The total cost of acquisition was E3,738 million in cash and shares of Allianz AG and obligations for future payments of approximately E200 million. The excess of the purchase price of E3,738 million over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired of E103 million was allocated to covenants not to compete in an amount of E863 million, to be amortized on a straight-line basis over 5 years, and goodwill of E2,773 million, to be amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. In connection with this acquisition, Allianz AG holds a call F-18 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) option on the remaining 30.5% ownership interest in PIMCO Advisors L.P., which is currently held by a third party. Subject to certain conditions, the call option will allow Allianz AG to purchase the remaining ownership interests on the last business day of any calendar quarter beginning on January 31, 2003. In addition, this third party holds a put option, under which it can require Allianz AG, subject to certain conditions, to purchase its ownership interests in PIMCO Advisors L.P., on the last business day of any calendar quarter. Settlement of the call and put options requires physical delivery of the PIMCO Advisor L.P. shares in exchange for cash. The put option is not recorded on the balance sheet as the fair value was determined to be zero based on the nature and terms of the option. - Allianz-Tiriac Asigurari, Bucharest: On August 21, 2000, the Allianz Group acquired 51.0% of Allianz-Tiriac Asigurari for E14 million. - Arab International Insurance Company, Cairo: On March 2, 2000, the Allianz Group increased its interest in Arab International Insurance Company by 40.0% to 80.0%. The acquisition cost was E10 million, bringing the total cost to E18 million. - Munchener und Magdeburger Hagelversicherung, Munich: On June 26, 2000, the Allianz Group increased its interest in Munchener and Magdeburger Hagelversicherung AG by 1.5% to 50.7%. The acquisition cost of additional interest was E0.1 million, bringing the total cost to E2 million. - Zwolsche Algemeene Holding, Nieuwegein: On December 20, 2000, AGF Group, Paris purchased 100% of the Zwolsche Algemeene Holding Company and its subsidiaries. The subsidiaries include life and health, property and casualty and asset management companies. The cost of the purchase was E599 million. The operating results of these companies were included in the consolidated financial statements for the first time in fiscal year 2001 with gross premium income of E205 million and net loss for 2001 of E12 million. - Assurance Generales de France (AGF), Paris: In 2000, the Allianz Group increased its interest in AGF by 10.9% to 65.2% for E780 million. The purchase resulted in additional goodwill of E467 million. The Allianz Group also incurred additional costs of E40 million for AGF contingent value rights (CVRs), which also resulted in additional goodwill of E40 million. (4) ACCOUNTING AND VALUATION POLICIES PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements are based on the annual financial statements of Allianz AG and all principal subsidiaries. Financial statements are uniformly prepared in conformity with IFRS accounting and valuation standards as of December 31, 2002. The Group has used interim financial statements for those entities whose fiscal year end is other than December 31, 2002. Equity consolidation is carried out on the basis of the benchmark method in conformity with IAS 22, Business Combinations. The acquisition costs are offset against the Group's proportion of the shareholders' equity in the subsidiaries at the date of acquisition. Certain assets and liabilities acquired by the Allianz Group are carried at their fair value on the date of acquisition of the subsidiary enterprises; for the proportion attributable to minority interests, the pre-acquisition carrying amounts are used. When foreign subsidiaries are consolidated for the first time, their net assets are translated at the current exchange rates at the date of acquisition. F-19 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) Goodwill arising from acquisitions is capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life. In the case of acquisitions prior to January 1, 1995, such differences have been recorded directly in revenue reserves within shareholders' equity in accordance with the transitional provisions in force under IAS 22. The earnings generated by subsidiaries after their first-time consolidation or, where appropriate, their acquisition adjusted for consolidation effects, are allocated to revenue reserves of the Group based on the Group's ownership percentage in the subsidiaries. The proportion of net income or losses attributable to minority interests has been calculated on the basis of the consolidated net income or losses of those enterprises for the year. Intra-Group receivables and payables, income and expenses, and profits have been eliminated. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION Allianz AG's reporting currency is the euro (E). Foreign currency is translated in accordance with IAS 21 -- The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, by the method of functional currency. The functional currencies for Group companies are usually the local currency of the relevant company, e.g., the prevailing currency in the environment where the enterprise carries out its ordinary activities. In accordance with the functional currency method, assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate on the balance sheet date and income and expenses are translated at the annual average rate in all financial statements of subsidiaries not reporting in euro. Any translation differences, including those arising in the process of equity consolidation, are recorded directly in shareholders' equity. Assets and liabilities of the Group, which are subject to exchange rate fluctuations, are normally safeguarded against such fluctuations by the fact that individual foreign subsidiaries have most of their assets and liabilities in the same currency. Currency gains/losses arising from foreign currency transactions (transactions in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity) are reported in other income or other expenses. The principal exchange rates used are summarized in the following table: E CLOSING RATES E AVERAGE RATES ----------------- --------------------------- CURRENCY 2002 2001 2002 2001 2000 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Australian Dollar (AUD).......... 1.851 1.739 1.735 1.732 1.596 Japanese Yen (JPY)............... 124.389 115.330 118.094 108.749 99.736 Pound Sterling (GBP)............. 0.651 0.609 0.629 0.622 0.069 Swiss Franc (CHF)................ 1.454 1.483 1.473 1.510 1.561 South Korean Won (KRW) (in thousands)..................... 1.249 1.162 1.178 1.155 1.053 US Dollar (USD).................. 1.042 0.885 0.945 0.896 0.926 USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires the Group to make estimates and assumptions that affect items reported in the consolidated balance sheet and income statement, and under contingent liabilities. The actual values may differ from those reported. The most important of such items are the reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses, the F-20 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) aggregate policy reserves and the loan loss allowance. In addition, management makes certain assumptions in connection with impairment reviews of investments, goodwill, and deferred taxes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON ASSETS INTANGIBLE ASSETS Intangible assets comprise goodwill and other intangible assets. GOODWILL represents the difference between the purchase price of subsidiaries and the Group's proportionate share of the fair value of net assets, at the time of acquisition. Minority interests are generally valued at amortized historical cost. Goodwill is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, which is normally 10 years for property and casualty insurance enterprises, 20 years for life and health insurance enterprises, 10 years for banks, and 20 years for asset management companies. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS are assessed as of each balance sheet date and each interim reporting date to determine if there are any factors that indicate goodwill and other intangible assets may be impaired. If there are indications that goodwill and other intangible assets are impaired, recoverable amounts for the goodwill and other intangible assets are determined. If the recoverable amounts are less than the carrying amount, an impairment charge is recognized. Gains or losses realized on the disposal of subsidiaries include any related unamortized goodwill balances. The present value of future profits (PVFP) represents the capitalized value of life/health insurance portfolios. The capitalized value is the present value of net cash flows anticipated in the future from insurance policies written at the point in time of first-time consolidation after the insurance portfolio was purchased. Interest accrues on the unamortized PVFP based upon the policy liability rate or contract rate. The capitalized value of life/health insurance policies is amortized over the years that such profits are anticipated to be received in proportion to the estimated gross margins or estimated gross profits for traditional participating products that follow the contribution principle and financial or investment products, respectively, and over the premium paying period in proportion to premiums for other traditional insurance products. The methods used by the Group to value insurance products purchased are consistent with the valuation methods used most commonly to value blocks of insurance business. They are also consistent with the basic methodology generally used to value insurance assets. The procedures used by the Group include: - Identify the future cash flows from the acquired business. - Identify the risks inherent in realizing those cash flows and the rate of return the Group believes it must earn in order to accept the risks inherent in realizing the cash flows. - Determine the value of the insurance asset by discounting the expected future cash flows by the discount rate the Group requires. Expected future cash flows used in determining the PVFP are based on actuarial determinations of future premium income, mortality, disease and surrender probabilities, in addition to underwriting costs and returns on assets that were invested in order to be able to meet the obligations arising under the insurance contracts. The discount rate used to determine the PVFP corresponds to the opportunity costs for the risk capital used. In selecting the rate of return, the Group considers the magnitude of the risks associated with the type of business being acquired, actuarial factors described in the preceding F-21 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) paragraph, cost of capital available to the Group to fund the acquisition and compatibility with other Group activities that may favorably affect future profits. Other intangible assets include software purchased from third parties or developed internally and real property rights, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful service lives or contractual terms. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS also include capitalized loyalty bonuses for senior management of the PIMCO Group, Delaware that are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years, as well as the value of the brand names of Dresdner Bank that are amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. The fair value for the names "Dresdner Bank" and "dit" (Deutscher Investment-Trust), registered as trade names, was determined using a royalty savings approach. INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATED ENTERPRISES, JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISES Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises are generally accounted for using the equity method, such that the carrying value of such investment represents the Group's proportionate share of their net assets. During 2002, the Group reduced the time lag in accounting for all material investments in associates to a period of no more than three months for IFRS. We accounted for this reduction by recording the income and equity changes occurring during the catch-up period (i.e., the period from June 30, 2001 to September 30, 2001), less any amounts already reflected in fiscal 2001 due to their significance, directly in shareholders' equity. The amount of income directly recorded in shareholders' equity in 2002 was E131 million. The impact of the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 on the financial results of Munich Re, our most significant associate, was considered in our 2001 income statement and statement of shareholders' equity in light of the significance and relevance of this impact to our 2001 consolidated financial statements. In the case of investments in enterprises that prepare their own consolidated financial statements, their carrying values are based on the sub-group's consolidated equity. The company's share of net income or loss from such investments is included in consolidated net income. The effect of profits and losses from intercompany transactions has been eliminated. Investments in affiliated enterprises, joint ventures, and associated enterprises, which are not accounted for using the equity method because they are not material, are carried at cost. Associated enterprises are all those enterprises in which the Group has an interest of between 20 percent and 50 percent, for all of which a significant influence is presumed. Income from investments in affiliate enterprises, joint ventures and associated enterprises is included as a separate component of total income as the Group considers income earned from such investments to be consistent with revenues such as realized gains, interest, and dividends earned from other investments. INVESTMENTS Investments include securities held to maturity, securities available for sale, real estate used by third parties and funds held by others under reinsurance contracts assumed. Derivatives used for hedge transactions are included with the classification of the item hedged. SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY are comprised of fixed income securities which the Group has the intent and ability to hold to maturity. They are carried at amortized cost and the related F-22 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) premium or discount is amortized using the interest method over the life of the security. Amortization of premium or discount is included in interest income. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE are securities that are not classified as held to maturity or trading assets. Available for sale securities are valued at fair value at the balance sheet date. Unrealized gains and losses, which are the difference between fair value and cost (amortized cost in the case of fixed income securities), are included as a separate component of shareholders' equity, net of deferred taxes, or, for amounts that would be due to participating policyholders if realized, taken to the latent reserve for premium refunds within other insurance reserves. Realized gains and losses on securities are generally determined by applying the average cost method. SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY, SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD are subject to impairment reviews. An impairment charge is recorded if a decline in fair value below the asset's carrying value is deemed to be other than temporary. As of the closing date for each quarter and year end, the Group identifies on a group-basis all shares whose market values indicate potential impairment (i.e. recoverable amount is below the group's acquisition cost). Impairment charges to be recognized in net profit or loss are determined on the basis of these data. Debt instruments are written down if financial difficulties on the part of the issuer, a default or delay in interest service or repayment of principal or an impending or actual insolvency indicate that repayment of the principal can no longer be expected. If in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment decreases related to an event occurring after the initial impairment charge, such charges are reversed through net income for the period. The maximum amount up to which such write-ups may occur is the acquisition cost or amortized cost, as applicable. REAL ESTATE USED BY THIRD PARTIES (i.e., real property and equivalent rights and buildings, including buildings on leased land) is carried at cost less accumulated, scheduled and unscheduled depreciation. Real estate used by third parties is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its estimated life. The fair value of real estate used by third parties is determined by the discounted cash flow method. FUNDS HELD BY OTHERS UNDER REINSURANCE CONTRACTS ASSUMED relate to cash deposits to which the Group is entitled, but which the ceding insurer retains as collateral for future obligations of the Group. The cash deposits are recorded on the balance sheet at face value, less any write-downs for balances that are deemed to not be fully recoverable. INVESTMENTS HELD ON ACCOUNT AND AT RISK OF LIFE INSURANCE POLICYHOLDERS Investments held on account and at risk of life insurance policyholders comprise mainly investments funding unit-linked life insurance policies and investments to cover obligations under policies where the benefits are index-linked. They are valued at market value on the balance sheet date. Unrealized gains and losses arising from market valuations lead to a corresponding increase or decrease in the related insurance reserves. Group enterprises keep and invest these investments separately from the Group's own investments. Policyholders are entitled to all gains and losses relating to this investments and therefore to the total amount of all the investments shown under this heading. F-23 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) DERIVATIVES The Group's insurance companies selectively use derivative financial instruments such as swaps, options and futures to hedge against changes in prices or interest rates in their investment portfolio. In the Group's banking business, derivatives are used both for trading purposes and to hedge against movements in interest rates, currency and other price risks of their investments, loans, deposit liabilities and other interest sensitive assets and liabilities. For derivatives used for hedging purposes, the Group designates its derivative instruments as a fair value cash flow, or hedge of a net investment in a foreign entity. Pursuant to IAS 39, the Group documents the hedge relationship, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for entering into various hedge transactions. The company also assesses, both at the hedge's inception and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives that are used for hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items. The Group discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective, the derivative or the hedged item expires, or is sold, terminated or exercised, or when management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the Group continues to carry the derivative on balance sheet at its fair value, and no longer adjusts the hedged item for changes in fair value. The adjustment of the carrying amount of the hedged item is accounted for in the same manner as other components of the carrying amount of that item. When hedge accounting for a cash flow hedge is discontinued, the Group continues to carry the derivative on balance sheet at its fair value and any unrealized gains and losses accumulated in shareholder's equity are recognized immediately. When a hedge of a net investment in a foreign entity is discontinued, the Group continues to carry the derivative on balance sheet at its fair value and any net unrealized gain or losses accumulated in shareholder's equity remain in shareholder's equity until the disposal of the foreign entity. Pursuant to IAS 39, derivative financial instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting are reported at fair value as financial assets or liabilities held for trading. Gains or losses on these instruments arising from valuation at fair value are included under trading income. This treatment is applicable to derivatives used independently, not in connection with hedge transactions, and for separated embedded derivatives of a hybrid financial instrument. In contrast, derivatives used in hedge transactions are recognized and classified as follows: Fair value hedges: The risk of changes in the fair value of reported assets or liabilities is hedged by a fair value hedge. Changes in the fair value of a hedging instrument are recognized in current period income, and classified together with the pro rata share of the profit or loss attributable to the change in value of the hedged risk recognized in the income statement. Cash flow hedges: Cash flow hedges reduce the exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or attributable to future cash flows from a firm commitment or a forecasted transaction. Any value changes in derivative instruments that represent an effective hedge are recorded under shareholders' equity, and recognized in income when the offsetting gain or loss associated with the hedged item is recognized. The ineffective part of the hedge is recognized directly in the income statement in the current period. Hedges of a net investment in a foreign entity: Hedge accounting may be applied to hedge a net investment in a foreign entity. Financial instruments are used to hedge currency risk. The proportion of gains or losses arising from valuation of the hedging instrument, which is classified F-24 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) as an effective hedge, is recognized in shareholders' equity, while the ineffective part is recognized in the income statement. For fair value and cash flow hedges of investment securities or loans, the hedge instrument is classified in the same balance sheet category as the hedged item when the hedge instrument has a positive fair value, and in Other Liabilities when the hedge instrument has a negative fair value. For fair value and cash flow hedges of debt issued and for hedges of a net investment in a foreign entity, the hedge instrument is included in Other Assets or Other Liabilities. LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BANKS AND CUSTOMERS Loans and advances to banks and customers originated by the Group and its consolidated subsidiaries that are intended to be held to maturity are generally carried at their outstanding unpaid principal balance net of the allowance for loan losses, deferred fees and costs on origination, and unamortized premiums or discounts. Interest revenues are accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Net deferred fees and premiums or discounts are recorded as an adjustment of the interest revenue yield over the lives of the related loans. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management determines that the payment of principal or interest is doubtful. Management's judgment is applied based on its credit assessment of the borrower. Non-accrual loans consist of loans on which interest income is no longer recognized on an accrued basis, and loans for which a specific provision is recorded for the entire amount of accrued interest receivable. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any accrued but unpaid interest previously recorded is reversed against current period interest revenues. Loans can only be restored to accrual status when interest and principal payments are made current (in accordance with the contractual terms), and in management's judgment, future payments in accordance with those terms are reasonably assured. When there is a doubt, regarding the ultimate collectibility of the principal of a loan placed in non-accrual status, all cash receipts are applied as reductions of principal. Once the recorded principal amount of the loan is reduced to zero, future cash receipts are recognized as interest income. Included in loans and advances to banks and customers are outstanding reverse repurchase transactions. A reverse repurchase transaction involves the purchase of securities with the simultaneous obligation to sell these securities at a future date at an agreed-upon price. If control of the securities remains in the Group over the entire lifetime of the transactions, the securities concerned are included in the Group's balance sheet and are valued in accordance with the accounting principles for trading assets or investments. Interest income on reverse repurchase agreements is reported as interest income in the consolidated income statement. LOAN IMPAIRMENTS AND PROVISIONS Impaired loans represent loans, for which, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Group will not be able to collect all interest and principal amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreements. Impaired loans are generally placed on non-accrual status. The allowance for loan losses represents management's estimate of probable losses that have occurred in the loan portfolio and other lending-related commitments as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is reported as a reduction of assets and the provisions for contingent liabilities, such as guarantees, loan commitments and other obligations are carried as liabilities. F-25 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) To allow management to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, all significant counterparty relationships are periodically reviewed. Specific allowances are established for impaired loans. The measurement of specific loss is determined by the excess of the recorded investment in the loan, including accrued interest, over either the present value of the expected future cash flows, the fair value of the underlying collateral or the market price of the loan. The country risk component is for loan exposures in countries where there are serious doubts about the debtors' abilities to comply with the repayment terms due to the economic or political situations prevailing in their respective countries of domicile, that is, for transfer and currency conversion risks. General losses (inherent losses) are established to provide for incurred but unidentified losses that are inherent to the loan portfolio. The amount of this allowance is determined based upon historical loss experience and management's evaluation of the loan portfolio under current events and economic conditions. Amounts determined to be uncollectible are charged to the allowance or written-off directly against the loan balance. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The provision for loan loss, which is charged to income, is the amount necessary to adjust the allowance to a level determined through the process described above. LEASE FINANCING TRANSACTIONS Loans and advances to customers include the Group's gross investment in leases less unearned finance income relating to lease financing transactions for which the Group is the lessor. The gross investment in leases is the aggregate of the minimum lease payments and any unguaranteed residual value accruing to the Group. Lease financing transactions include direct financing leases and leveraged leases. The unearned finance income is amortized over the period of the lease so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment outstanding in respect of the finance lease. TRADING ASSETS Trading assets consist of debt and equity securities, derivatives with positive market values, promissory notes and precious metal holdings, which have been acquired solely for sale in the near term. They are classified as "Held for trading" on account of their purpose and are reported at fair value at the balance sheet date. Changes in fair value are recognized directly in the income statement. Exchange-traded financial instruments are valued at the exchange prices prevailing on the last exchange trading day of the year. To determine the market values of unlisted financial instruments, quotations of similar instruments or other valuation models (in particular present value models or option pricing models) are used. Creditworthiness, settlement costs and market liquidity are also taken into account as integral components of the valuation process. Realized gains and losses on securities are primarily calculated based on the average cost method. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents include balances with banks payable on demand, balances with central banks, checks and cash on hand, treasury bills (to the extent that they are not included in trading assets), and bills of exchange which are eligible for refinancing at central banks, subject to a maximum term of six months from the date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at their face value, with holdings of foreign notes and coins valued at year-end closing prices. F-26 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) OTHER ASSETS Other assets consist of real estate owned by the Allianz Group and used for its own activities, equipment, accounts receivable, deferred acquisition costs, prepaid expenses and miscellaneous assets. REAL ESTATE OWNED BY THE ALLIANZ GROUP USED FOR ITS OWN ACTIVITIES (e.g., real property, and buildings, including buildings on leased land) is carried at cost less accumulated, scheduled and unscheduled depreciation. The capitalized cost of buildings is calculated on the basis of acquisition cost and depreciated over a maximum of 50 years in accordance with their useful lives. Buildings owned by the Allianz Group for its own use are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. EQUIPMENT is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful life of equipment is 2 to 10 years, except for purchased information technology equipment which is 2 to 8 years. An impairment loss is recognized when the recoverable amounts of these assets are less than their carrying amount. Costs for repairs and maintenance are charged to expenses while improvements are capitalized. RECEIVABLES are recorded at face value less any payments received or appropriate valuation allowances. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS related to universal life, investment products and traditional participating business that follow the contribution principle are amortized in relation to expected gross profits or estimated gross margins over the life of the policy. Deferred policy acquisition costs related to other traditional life business are deferred and amortized over the premium paying period of the policy in proportion to premium revenues. Deferred acquisition costs include commissions paid and other costs which vary with and are incurred in connection with the acquisition or renewal of insurance policies. All deferred policy acquisition costs are reviewed regularly to determine if they are recoverable from future operations, including anticipated investment income. Deferred acquisition costs which are not deemed to be recoverable, are charged to income. SECURITIES BORROWING AND LENDING The Group enters into securities borrowing and lending transactions on behalf of its customers and to fulfill its own obligations to deliver or take delivery of securities and to maximize returns on the investment-portfolios of the insurance companies. Such transactions involve the transfer of securities from one market participant (lender) to a counterparty (borrower), for a certain period of time. If the lender retains control, the lender continues to report the securities involved on its balance sheet, whereas borrowed securities are not reported. Securities borrowed and securities loaned are recorded at the amount of cash advanced and received, respectively, and are collateralized primarily by equity and fixed income securities. Securities borrowed transactions generally require the Group to deposit cash collateral with the securities lender. In a securities loaned transaction, the Group generally receives cash collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of the market value of the securities loaned. The Group monitors the fair value of securities borrowed and securities loaned and additional collateral is obtained if necessary. Income and expenses from securities borrowing and lending transactions are recognized on an accrual basis and reported under "Interest and similar income" or "Interest and similar expenses". F-27 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) In cases where securities lending transactions are combined with forward contracts with the same counterparty ("structured securities lending transactions"), both the securities lending transaction and derivative instrument are considered collectively in assessing whether the Group has surrendered of the securities, resulting in the derecognition of securities. Upon derecognition, gains and losses are recognized as the difference between the value of consideration received and the carrying value of the securities. ASSET SECURITIZATIONS The Group transfers financial assets to certain special purpose entities in revolving securitizations of commercial mortgage or other loan portfolios. The Group consolidates these special purpose entities as the Group continues to control the financial assets transferred and retains the servicing of such loans. LEASES Property and equipment holdings are used by the Group under operating leases, whereby the risks and benefits relating to ownership of the assets remain with the lessor, and are not recorded on our balance sheet. Payments made under operating leases to the lessor are charged to administrative expenses using the straight-line method over the period of the lease. When an operating lease is terminated before the lease period has expired, any penalty is recognized in full as an expense at the time when such termination takes place. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON EQUITY AND LIABILITIES SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Treasury stock held by the Group is stated as shares held by the company. These shares are deducted from shareholders' equity at cost. Gains and losses arising from trading in treasury stock held by the company are added to revenue reserves after income tax has been deducted. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME is defined as the change in equity of an entity excluding transactions with shareholders such as the issuance of common or preferred shares, payment of dividends and purchase of treasury shares. Comprehensive income has two major components: net income, as reported in the Consolidated Income Statement, and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes such items as unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency translation, securities available for sale, and derivatives involved in hedging relationships net of applicable deferred income taxes. It also includes, where applicable, adjustments to insurance policyholder liabilities and deferred acquisition costs. Comprehensive income does not include changes in the fair value of non-marketable securities and other assets generally carried at cost. INSURANCE RESERVES Insurance reserves include unearned premiums, the aggregate policy reserves, reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, and other insurance reserves. Premiums written attributable to income of future years are accrued in unearned premiums. These premiums are distributed to the current fiscal year and subsequent years in relation to the exact risk coverage period. However, if there is no proportionality between risk and premium, account must be taken of the varying development of risk over time. Unearned premiums for reinsurance business assumed are generally based on the calculations of the cedant. F-28 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The AGGREGATE POLICY RESERVE for traditional life insurance products, including the reserve for advancing age in health insurance, is based on actuarial principles and is calculated using the present value of future benefits less the present value of future net premiums. Reserves for traditional participating insurance products that follow the contribution principle are computed based on assumptions for mortality and interest that are guaranteed in the contracts or are used in determining dividends. Reserves for other traditional life insurance products are determined using Group experience as to mortality, morbidity, lapses, and interest rates, with a provision for adverse deviation. The Group may vary assumptions by year of policy issue. The aggregate policy reserve for financial and investment products is equal to the account value. Account values are not actuarially determined. Rather, account values are equal to the premium received and interest credited to the policy less deductions for mortality costs and expense charges assessed against the policyholder. Mortality costs and expense charges are established by the Group based upon its experience and cost structure and in accordance with policy terms. The Group's life insurance subsidiaries offer a wide range of traditional life insurance, financial and investment products. Traditional life insurance products consist of both short and long duration policies with participating and non-participating features. Short duration traditional life insurance products include term, accident and health contracts. Long duration traditional life insurance products include individual and group whole-life, endowment, guaranteed renewable term and accident and health, and annuity contracts. Financial and investment products consist of universal life, unit-linked products (variable annuities), single premium annuity, and guaranteed investment contracts. The calculation of aggregate policy reserves is in compliance with various U.S. Financial Accounting Standards (FAS), such as FAS 60, FAS 97, and FAS 120. The calculation of aggregate policy reserves depends on the extent to which policyholders benefit from any surpluses earned on insurance policies. The assumptions on which the calculation is based vary, particularly with regard to mortality, morbidity, interest rates and the treatment of acquisition costs. A distinction is drawn between the following situations: -- policyholders participate in surpluses in the same proportion as their policies have contributed to these surpluses. Policyholders do not participate in losses. This is referred to as the contribution principle. Assumptions in this case are conservative and contractually agreed, so there is a strong probability that surpluses will arise, most of which have to be distributed to policyholders. Acquisition costs are deferred over the term of the policies in the same proportion as the surpluses in individual years contribute to the surplus on the portfolio concerned. -- policyholders participate in a surplus on the basis of a mechanical or non-contributory system, and policyholders are guaranteed fixed benefits and do not participate in any profits. All other benefits and risks are carried by the insurer. Assumptions in these cases, including provisions for adverse deviations, are used which are based on values at the time when the policy is taken out. In health insurance the insurer has the option of adjusting premiums when the assumptions change. Acquisition costs are also recognized over the terms of these policies, but in the same proportion as premiums written for the year concerned compared to the total premium income. -- policyholders carry not only the investment risk and corresponding opportunities for benefit, but also any losses (e. g. unit-linked insurance policies). The aggregate reserve for these policies is shown under a separate liability heading "Insurance reserves for life F-29 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) insurance where the investment risk is carried by policyholders." In this case, the aggregate reserve is not calculated actuarially, but rather it moves in line with the value of the related investments. -- policyholders are entitled, within certain limits, to vary the level of premium payments, and the life insurance enterprise does not generally give any contractual guarantees about minimum rate of return or the level of management fees (e. g. universal life policies). In this case, the aggregate reserve is not calculated actuarially, but rather it moves in line with the policyholders' account balances. The interest rate assumptions were as follows: POLICIES USING THE OTHER CONTRIBUTION PRINCIPLE POLICIES ---------------------- -------- Aggregate policy reserves................................ 3-4% 3-7% Deferred acquisition costs............................... 5-6% 5-7% Acquistion costs are deferred over the term of the policies in the same proportion as the surpluses in individual years contribute to the surplus on the portfolio concerned. THE RESERVE FOR LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES is for future payment obligations under insurance claims, where normally either the amount of benefits to be paid or the date when payments are to be made is not yet fixed. The reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses is calculated at the estimated amount considered necessary to settle claims in full. It is calculated using recognized actuarial methods. Unusual cases are calculated on an individual basis. Past experience is taken into account as well as current and future anticipated social and economic factors. With the exception of claims for which annuity reserves have been established, claim reserves are not discounted. The necessary estimates may mean that the payment obligations calculated may differ from the ultimate costs. The reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses includes: - claims reported at the balance sheet date - claims incurred but not yet reported at the balance sheet date - claims settlement expenses. There is no adequate statistical data available for some risk exposures in liability insurance, such as environmental and asbestos claims and large-scale individual claims, because some aspects of these types of claims are still evolving. Appropriate provision has been made for such cases following an analysis of the portfolios in which such risks occur. OTHER INSURANCE RESERVES include the reserve for premium refunds. This item includes experience-rated and other premium refunds in favor of policyholders. The reserve for premium refunds includes the amounts allocated under the relevant local statutory or contractual regulations to the accounts of the policyholders and the amounts resulting from the differences between these IFRS based financial statements and the local financial statements (latent reserve for premium refunds), which will reverse and enter into future deferred profit sharing calculations. These differences are recognized on a future accrual basis and reported in profit participation accounts. Unrealized gains and losses in connection with the valuation of investments are recognized in the latent reserve for premium refunds to the extent that the policyholder will participate in such gains and losses on the basis of statutory or contractual regulations when they are realized. F-30 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) The profit participation allocated to participating policyholders or paid out to them reduces the reserve. Any dividends allocated or paid out over and above the reserve are recorded in operating expenses. Methods and corresponding percentages for participation in profits by the policyholders are set out below for the most significant countries: COUNTRY METHOD PERCENTAGE ------- ------- ---------- Germany: Life...................................................... Minimum 90% Health.................................................... Minimum 80% France-Life................................................. Minimum 85% Italy-Life.................................................. Minimum 85% Other insurance reserves also include the premium deficiency reserve which is calculated individually for each insurance portfolio on the basis of estimates of future claims, costs, premiums earned and proportionate investment income. For short duration contracts, a premium deficiency is recognized if the sum of unexpected claim costs, claim adjustment expenses, expected dividends to policyholders, unamortized acquisition costs, and maintenance expenses exceeds related unearned premiums while considering anticipated investment income. For long duration contracts, if actual experience regarding investment yields, mortality, morbidity, terminations or expense indicate that existing contract liabilities, along with the present value of future gross premiums, will not be sufficient to cover the present value of future benefits and to recover unamortized acquisition costs, then a premium deficiency is recognized. REINSURANCE Reinsurance premiums ceded and reinsurance recoveries on benefits and claims incurred are deducted from the respective income and expense accounts. Assets and liabilities related to reinsurance ceded are reported on a gross basis. Prepaid reinsurance represents the ceded portion of unearned premiums. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers are estimated in a manner consistent with the claim liability associated with the reinsured risks. Accordingly, revenues and expenses related to reinsurance agreements are recognized consistent with the underlying risk of the business reinsured. LIABILITIES TO BANKS AND CUSTOMERS AND CERTIFICATED LIABILITIES Interest-bearing liabilities are accounted for at their nominal value, e.g., at the amount to be repaid. Where liabilities are entered into subject to a discount, such discounts are reported as prepaid expenses and amortized over the life of the respective liabilities, using the effective yield method. Non-interest-bearing liabilities such as zero-coupon bonds are valued at their present value on initial recognition and written up in accordance with the effective yield method at the contracted interest rate. Costs relating to the issuance of debt securities, such as fees relating to placement, underwriting commitments, subscription, management or syndication are recognized in the year that they are incurred, and are reported in "Other expenses". Liabilities to banks and customers also include repurchase ("repo") transactions. Repo transactions involves the sale of securities by the Group to a counterparty, subject to the simultaneous agreement to repurchase these securities at a certain later date, at an agreed price. If control of the securities remains in the Group over the entire lifetime of the transactions, the securities concerned are retained in the Group's balance sheet and are valued in accordance F-31 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) with the accounting principles for trading assets or investments. The proceeds of the sale are reported under "Liabilities to banks" or "Liabilities to customers" as appropriate. Interest expenses from repos are reported as Interest and similar expenses in the consolidated income statement. TRADING LIABILITIES Trading liabilities primarily include derivatives with negative market values and obligations to deliver assets arising from short sales of securities, which are carried out in order to benefit from short-term price fluctuations. The securities required to close out short sales are obtained through securities borrowing or repurchase agreements. These liabilities are valued the same as trading assets. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES Pension and similar reserves are calculated taking local circumstances into account as well as current mortality, morbidity and employee turnover projections. Expected future trends in salaries and wages, retirement rates and pension increases are also taken into account. The notional interest rate used is based on the rate for long-term, highly rated corporate or government bonds. Accrued taxes are calculated in accordance with relevant local tax regulations. Miscellaneous accrued liabilities primarily include reserves for restructuring, for anticipated losses arising from non-insurance business, for litigation, for employees (e.g., early retirement, phased retirement, employee awards for long service, and vacation) and agents (e.g., unpaid commissions). OTHER LIABILITIES Other liabilities include funds held under reinsurance business ceded, accounts payable on direct insurance business, accounts payable on reinsurance business, and miscellaneous liabilities. These are reported at the redemption value. DEFERRED TAXES The calculation of deferred tax is based on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities in the published balance sheet and their tax bases, and on differences arising from the application of uniform valuation policies for consolidation purposes. The tax rates used for the calculation of deferred taxes are the local rates applicable in the countries concerned; changes to tax rates already adopted prior to or as of the balance sheet date are taken into account. PREMIUMS Property-casualty insurance premiums are recognized as revenues over the period of the contract in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. Unearned premiums are calculated separately for each individual policy to cover the unexpired portion of written premiums. Health insurance premiums for long duration contracts such as non-cancelable and guaranteed renewable contracts that are expected to remain in force over an extended period of time are recognized as earned when due. Premiums for short duration health insurance contracts F-32 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) are recognized as revenues over the period of the contract in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. Unearned premiums are calculated separately for each individual policy to cover the unexpired portion of written premiums. In the case of premiums for life insurance products where the policyholder carries the investment risk (e.g., variable annuities), only those parts of the premiums used to cover the risks insured and costs involved are treated as premium income. Life insurance premiums on traditional life insurance policies are recognized as earned when due. Premiums on short duration life insurance policies are recognized as revenues over the period of the contract in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. Unearned premiums are calculated separately for each individual policy to cover the unexpired portion of written premiums. Benefits and expenses are provided against such revenues to recognize profits over the estimated life of the policies. Revenues for financial and investment policies, such as universal life and variable annuity contracts, represent charges assessed against the policyholders' account balance for the cost of insurance, surrenders and policy administration and are included with premiums earned on the income statement. Benefits charged to expense include benefit claims incurred during the period in excess of policy account balances and interest credited to policy account balances. INTEREST AND SIMILAR INCOME/EXPENSES Interest income and interest expenses are recognized on an accrual basis. Interest income from lending business is recognized using the effective yield method. This item also includes dividends from available for sale equity securities and interest recognized on finance leases. Dividends are recognized in income when earned. Interest on finance leases is recognized in interest income over the term of the respective lease so that a constant period yield based on the net investment is attained. TRADING INCOME Trading income comprises all realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading assets and trading liabilities. In addition, commissions and all interest and all dividend income attributable to trading operations and related refinancing costs are included in trading income. FEE AND COMMISSION INCOME AND EXPENSES Interest income and interest expenses are recognized on an accrual basis. Reporting of current income includes interest, dividends from equity securities, the share of net income from enterprises accounted for using the equity method, dividend income from investments in affiliated enterprises and participations, and interest recognized on finance leases. Dividends are recognized in income when received. Interest on finance leases is recognized in interest income over the term of the respective lease so that a constant yield based on the net investment is attained. In addition to traditional commission income received on security transactions, fee and commission income in the securities business also includes commissions received in relation to private placements, syndicated loans and financial advisory services. Other fees reflect commissions received for trust and custody services, for the brokerage of insurance policies, credit cards, home loans and savings contracts and real estate. Fee and commission income is recognized in banking business when the corresponding service is provided. F-33 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) TRUSTEE BUSINESS Assets and liabilities held by the Group in its own name, but for the account of third parties, are not reported in the balance sheet. Commissions received from such business are shown as "Fee and commission income" in the income statement. CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT The consolidated statement of cash flows shows the structure of and changes in cash and cash equivalents of Allianz Group during the financial year from the cash flows arising from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. The cash flows from investing activities primarily comprise of changes in investment securities (such as securities available for sale or held to maturity). Financing activities include all cash flows from transactions involving equity capital, participation certificates and subordinated liabilities. Cash flows from operating activities contain all other activities, which belong to the principal revenue-generating activities. EQUITY REMUNERATION PLANS The Group has elected to account for its share awards (stock appreciation rights) under the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees as permitted by Statement 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. Under the intrinsic value-based method, compensation expense is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the underlying shares at the balance sheet date over the reference price at the grant date. Compensation expense is recorded over a period in which employees perform services to which the awards relate. An increase or decrease in market price of the underlying shares results in a corresponding change in compensation expense. Compensation expense is reversed in the period an award is forfeited. The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income (loss) and earnings per share for each period indicated as if the Group applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement 123 to its equity remuneration plans. See Note 44 for a description of the method and fair value assumptions used in estimating the fair value of options. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 ---------------------------- 2002 2001 2000 -------- ------- ------- (E IN MILLIONS) Net income, as reported............................... E (1,167) E 1,623 E 3,460 Add: Share-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects..... 5 27 21 Deduct: Share-based compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects................................. 6 31 23 -------- ------- ------- Pro forma net income (loss)........................... E (1,168) E 1,619 E 3,458 ======== ======= ======= Earnings (loss) per share: Basic-as reported................................... E (4.81) E 6.66 E 14.10 Basic-pro forma..................................... E (4.81) E 6.65 E 14.09 Diluted-as reported................................. E (4.81) E 6.66 E 14.10 Diluted-pro forma................................... E (4.81) E 6.65 E 14.09 F-34 ALLIANZ GROUP NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) SEGMENT REPORTING Information on segments is reported separately in the consolidated financial statements. Segment information has been prepared on the basis of the accounting regulations used to prepare the consolidated financial statements as a whole. In determining the segments of the Group, management evaluates the organization of the Group, the revenue generating activities of the Group, the Group's internal management reporting process and the level of financial information available and utilized by the Management Board in reviewing performance. As a result of the Group's worldwide organization, the business activities of the Group are first segregated by product and type of service: insurance activities, banking activities and asset management activities. Due to differences in the nature of products, risks and capital allocation, insurance activities are further divided between property-casualty and life/health categories. Thus, the operating segments are structured as Property-Casualty, Life/Health, Banking, and Asset Management. The Group does not aggregate separate operating segments. Based on various legal, regulatory and other operational issues associated with operating entities in jurisdictions worldwide, the segments of the Group are also further analyzed by geographical areas or regions in a matrix that comprises a number of profit and service-center segments. This geographic analysis is performed to provide further understanding of trends and results underlying the segment data. Property-Casualty: The Group's property-casualty segment provides automobile, homeowners, liabil