Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number 001-33274

 

TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

20-5701514

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Organization)

 

 

 

24601 Center Ridge Road, Suite 200, Westlake, OH  44145-5639

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(440) 808-9100

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer ¨

 

Smaller reporting company ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes o  No x

 

Number of Common Shares outstanding at November 1, 2013: 29,569,781 common shares.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA LLC

 

FORM 10-Q

 

September 30, 2013

 

INDEX

 

 

Page

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

1

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

2

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013and 2012

4

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

16

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

30

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

30

 

 

 

 

Warning Concerning Forward Looking Statements

32

 

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

37

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

37

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

38

 

 

 

SIGNATURE

39

 

As used herein the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “TA” include TravelCenters of America LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.

 



Table of Contents

 

Part I.  Financial Information

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

126,862

 

$

35,189

 

Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,591 as of September 30, 2013, and $1,516 as of December 31, 2012)

 

153,955

 

106,273

 

Inventories

 

193,088

 

191,006

 

Other current assets

 

53,123

 

61,020

 

Total current assets

 

527,028

 

393,488

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

623,255

 

576,512

 

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

24,297

 

20,041

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

34,574

 

28,240

 

Total assets

 

$

1,209,154

 

$

1,018,281

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

178,177

 

$

143,605

 

Current HPT Leases liabilities

 

31,765

 

28,354

 

Other current liabilities

 

138,420

 

111,168

 

Total current liabilities

 

348,362

 

283,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent HPT Leases liabilities

 

342,449

 

351,135

 

Senior Notes due 2028

 

110,000

 

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

33,298

 

30,585

 

Total liabilities

 

834,109

 

664,847

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares, no par value, 31,683,666 shares authorized at September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, and 29,569,781 and 29,536,466 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively

 

607,345

 

605,106

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

1,023

 

1,299

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(233,323

)

(252,971

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

375,045

 

353,434

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

1,209,154

 

$

1,018,281

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

1



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

$

1,667,464

 

$

1,666,810

 

Nonfuel

 

391,319

 

363,402

 

Rent and royalties

 

3,313

 

3,941

 

Total revenues

 

2,062,096

 

2,034,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation):

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

1,576,118

 

1,581,830

 

Nonfuel

 

178,837

 

164,017

 

Total cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation)

 

1,754,955

 

1,745,847

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Site level operating

 

195,428

 

179,737

 

Selling, general & administrative

 

23,705

 

25,577

 

Real estate rent

 

52,424

 

49,185

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

14,646

 

12,874

 

Total operating expenses

 

286,203

 

267,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

20,938

 

20,933

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from equity investees

 

859

 

801

 

Acquisition costs

 

(1,026

)

(189

)

Interest income

 

620

 

512

 

Interest expense

 

(4,514

)

(2,638

)

Income before income taxes

 

16,877

 

19,419

 

Provision for income taxes

 

1,074

 

429

 

Net income

 

$

15,803

 

$

18,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $50 and $89, respectively

 

116

 

222

 

Equity interest in investee’s unrealized loss on investments

 

14

 

35

 

Other comprehensive income

 

130

 

257

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

15,933

 

$

19,247

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.66

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

$

4,927,971

 

$

5,039,010

 

Nonfuel

 

1,100,554

 

1,020,299

 

Rent and royalties

 

9,676

 

11,220

 

Total revenues

 

6,038,201

 

6,070,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation):

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

4,669,885

 

4,789,447

 

Nonfuel

 

496,140

 

455,201

 

Total cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation)

 

5,166,025

 

5,244,648

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Site level operating

 

570,007

 

525,962

 

Selling, general & administrative

 

71,414

 

73,110

 

Real estate rent

 

156,412

 

148,030

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

41,894

 

37,138

 

Total operating expenses

 

839,727

 

784,240

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

32,449

 

41,641

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from equity investees

 

2,018

 

1,263

 

Acquisition costs

 

(1,346

)

(647

)

Interest income

 

1,162

 

1,094

 

Interest expense

 

(13,009

)

(7,632

)

Income before income taxes

 

21,274

 

35,719

 

Provision for income taxes

 

1,626

 

1,062

 

Net income

 

$

19,648

 

$

34,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $(88) and $86, respectively

 

(209

)

218

 

Equity interest in investee’s unrealized loss on investments

 

(67

)

31

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(276

)

249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

19,372

 

$

34,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted

 

$

0.66

 

$

1.20

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

19,648

 

$

34,657

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Noncash rent expense

 

(6,636

)

(7,660

)

Share based compensation expense

 

2,239

 

1,562

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

41,894

 

37,138

 

Income from equity investees

 

(2,018

)

(1,263

)

Distribution from equity investee

 

 

4,800

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

496

 

263

 

Deferred income tax provision

 

515

 

425

 

Charge (credit) for doubtful accounts

 

(138

)

27

 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of business acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(47,649

)

(46,040

)

Inventories

 

(1,144

)

(14,840

)

Other current assets

 

9,669

 

5,917

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

59,558

 

73,830

 

Other, net

 

1,428

 

458

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

77,862

 

89,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of improvements to HPT

 

60,979

 

48,282

 

Proceeds from asset sales

 

514

 

90

 

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

 

(27,887

)

(41,083

)

Capital expenditures

 

(125,671

)

(111,573

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(92,065

)

(104,284

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale/leaseback transactions with HPT

 

2,184

 

 

Proceeds from Senior Notes issuance

 

110,000

 

 

Sale/leaseback financing obligation payments

 

(1,546

)

(1,641

)

Payment of deferred financing fees

 

(4,749

)

(22

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

105,889

 

(1,663

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(13

)

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

91,673

 

(16,645

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

 

35,189

 

118,255

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

 

$

126,862

 

$

101,610

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid (including rent classified as interest)

 

$

11,346

 

$

7,244

 

Income taxes paid (net of refunds)

 

$

745

 

$

1,047

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

1.                                      Basis of Presentation, Business Description and Organization

 

TravelCenters of America LLC, which we refer to as the Company or we, us and our, primarily operates and franchises travel centers under the “TravelCenters of America,” “TA” or related brand names, or the TA brand, and the “Petro Stopping Centers” and “Petro” brand names, or the Petro brand, and other brand names along the U.S. interstate highway system.  Our customers include long haul trucking fleets and their drivers, independent truck drivers and motorists.

 

At September 30, 2013, our geographically diverse business included 247 locations in 42 U.S. states and in Canada.  As of September 30, 2013, we operated 214 of these locations, which we refer to as Company operated sites, and our franchisees operated 33 of these locations. Of our 247 locations at September 30, 2013, we owned 30, we leased or managed 190 from or for others, including 184 that we leased from Hospitality Properties Trust, or HPT, and franchisees owned or leased from others 27.  We subleased to franchisees six locations we lease from HPT.

 

Our travel centers include over 25 acres of land on average and typically offer customers diesel fuel and gasoline as well as nonfuel products and services such as truck repair and maintenance services, full service restaurants, quick service restaurants, travel and convenience stores and various other driver amenities.  We also collect rents, royalties and other fees from our franchisees.

 

We manage our business on the basis of one operating segment and, therefore, have one reportable segment. Our locations sell similar products and services, use similar processes to sell those products and services, and sell their products and services to similar customers. We sometimes make specific disclosures concerning fuel and nonfuel products and services because it facilitates our discussion of trends and operational initiatives within our business and industry.  We have only a single travel center located in a foreign country, Canada, and, we do not consider the revenues and assets related to our operations in Canada to be material to us.

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited.  These unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, applicable for interim financial statements.  The disclosures do not include all the information necessary for complete financial statements in accordance with GAAP.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, or our Annual Report.  In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.  While our revenues are modestly seasonal, the quarterly variations in our operating results may reflect greater seasonal differences because our rent and certain other costs do not vary seasonally.  For this and other reasons, our operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

 

We have reclassified certain prior year amounts between real estate rent and depreciation and amortization to be consistent with the current year presentation.  The total amounts of prior year operating expenses are unchanged.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In January 2013, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update requires companies to report, in one place, information about reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Companies are also required to present details of reclassifications in the disclosure of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The implementation of this update caused no changes to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which sets forth explicit guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

2.                                      Earnings Per Share

 

Unvested shares issued under our share award plan are deemed participating securities because they participate equally in earnings with all of our other common shares.  The following table presents a reconciliation from net income to the net income available to common shareholders and the related earnings per share.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income, as reported

 

$

15,803

 

$

18,990

 

$

19,648

 

$

34,657

 

Less: net income attributable to participating securities

 

979

 

1,086

 

1,220

 

1,986

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

14,824

 

$

17,904

 

$

18,428

 

$

32,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares(1) 

 

27,737,712

 

27,162,024

 

27,717,490

 

27,143,539

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted net income per share

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.66

 

$

0.66

 

$

1.20

 

 


(1)   Excludes unvested shares granted under our share award plan, which shares are considered participating securities because they participate equally in earnings and losses with all of our other common shareholders.  The weighted average number of unvested shares outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, was 1,832,378 and 1,647,756, respectively.  The weighted average number of unvested shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, was 1,835,023 and 1,649,891, respectively.

 

3.                                      Inventories

 

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonfuel products

 

$

148,791

 

$

144,025

 

Fuel products

 

44,297

 

46,981

 

Total inventories

 

$

193,088

 

$

191,006

 

 

4.                                      Acquisitions

 

During the first nine months of 2013, we acquired six locations.  These sites were acquired for an aggregate of approximately $27,948, and we accounted for these transactions as business combinations, as required by GAAP.  Two of these locations were purchased from franchisees.  We have included the results of all of the acquired sites in our condensed consolidated financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition.  The pro forma impact of including the results of operations of the acquired business from the beginning of the period is not material to our results of operations.  The following table summarizes the amounts assigned, based on their fair values, to the assets we acquired and liabilities we assumed in the business combinations described above.  The estimates of fair values for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based upon preliminary calculations and valuations and our estimates and assumptions for each of these acquisitions are subject to change as we obtain additional information during the respective measurement periods (up to one year from the acquisition date).

 

6



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

Cash 

 

$

61

 

Inventories

 

962

 

Other current assets

 

7

 

Property and equipment

 

22,239

 

Goodwill

 

5,077

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

295

 

Other current liabilities

 

(279

)

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

(414

)

Total purchase price

 

$

27,948

 

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we incurred and charged to expense $1,026 and $1,346, respectively, of acquisition costs related to our acquisition activities.

 

As of September 30, 2013, we had entered agreements to acquire four travel center properties for a total of approximately $20,462.  We completed two of these acquisitions in October 2013 for a total of $8,862.  We expect to complete the other acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2013, but these purchases are subject to conditions and may not occur, may be delayed or the terms may change.

 

5.                                      Senior Notes

 

On January 15, 2013, we issued at par $110,000 aggregate principal amount of our 8.25% Senior Notes, or the Senior Notes, in an underwritten public offering.  The Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations. The Senior Notes bear interest at 8.25% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2013. The Senior Notes mature on January 15, 2028. We may, at our option, at any time on or after January 15, 2016, redeem some or all of the Senior Notes by paying 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes to be redeemed plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the redemption date.  The indenture governing our Senior Notes does not limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur.  We may issue additional debt from time to time.  Total expenses of the offering of $4,914 were capitalized as deferred financing costs, which are included in other noncurrent assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet and which are being amortized evenly over the term of the Senior Notes as interest expense.

 

We estimate that the fair value of our Senior Notes was $112,992 based on the trading price (a Level 1 input) of our Senior Notes on September 30, 2013.  The fair value of the Senior Notes exceeds the book value because the Senior Notes were trading at a premium to their par value.

 

6.                                      Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2013, consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment

 

Equity interest in
investee’s
unrealized gain
(loss) on
investments

 

Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

1,200

 

$

99

 

$

1,299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $(88)

 

(209

)

 

(209

)

Equity interest in investee’s unrealized loss on investments

 

 

(67

)

(67

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

(209

)

(67

)

(276

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2013

 

$

991

 

$

32

 

$

1,023

 

 

7



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

7.                                      Related Party Transactions

 

Relationship with HPT

 

HPT was our parent company until 2007 and is our principal landlord and our largest shareholder.  We were created as a separate public company in 2007 as a result of a spin off from HPT.  As of September 30, 2013, HPT owned 2,540,000 of our common shares, representing approximately 8.6% of our outstanding common shares.  One of our Managing Directors, Mr. Barry Portnoy, is a managing trustee of HPT.  Mr. Barry Portnoy’s son, Mr. Adam Portnoy, is also a managing trustee of HPT, and Mr. Barry Portnoy’s son-in-law is an executive officer of HPT.  Our other Managing Director, Mr. Thomas O’Brien, who is also our President and Chief Executive Officer, was a former executive officer of HPT.  In addition, one of our Independent Directors, Mr. Arthur Koumantzelis, was a trustee of HPT at the time we were created; Mr. Koumantzelis resigned and ceased to be a trustee of HPT shortly before he joined our Board of Directors in 2007.

 

We have two leases with HPT, the TA Lease and the Petro Lease, pursuant to which we lease 184 locations from HPT.  Our TA Lease is for 144 locations that we operate primarily under the TA brand.  Our Petro Lease is for 40 locations that we operate under the Petro brand.  The TA Lease expires on December 31, 2022.  The Petro Lease expires on June 30, 2024, and may be extended by us for up to two additional periods of 15 years each.  We have the right to use the “TA”, “TravelCenters of America” and other trademarks, which are owned by HPT, during the term of the TA Lease.  We refer to the TA Lease and Petro Lease collectively as the HPT Leases.

 

The HPT Leases are “triple net” leases that require us to pay all costs incurred in the operation of the leased locations, including personnel, utilities, acquiring inventories, providing services to customers, insurance, paying real estate and personal property taxes, environmental related expenses, underground storage tank removal costs and ground lease payments at those locations at which HPT leases the property and subleases it to us.  We also are required to generally indemnify HPT for certain environmental matters and for liabilities which arise during the terms of the leases from ownership or operation of the leased locations.  In addition, we are obligated to pay HPT at lease expiration an amount equal to an estimate of the cost of removing underground storage tanks on the leased sites.

 

Effective February 2012, the annual rent amount payable under the TA Lease increased by $5,000 pursuant to the final fixed rent increase included in the HPT Leases.  Accordingly, under the current terms of the HPT Leases, our rent payments to HPT will not increase except as a result of percentage rent and rent related to sales to HPT of improvements we make to properties we lease from HPT, as further described in the following paragraphs, or in the event HPT leases other properties to us.

 

Effective January 2012, we began to incur percentage rent payable to HPT under the TA Lease, and effective January 2013, we began to incur percentage rent payable to HPT under the Petro Lease.  Percentage rent under the HPT Leases is based on the excess of our fuel and nonfuel revenues over such revenues in the applicable base year periods.  The percentage rent is paid to HPT quarterly in arrears.  HPT has agreed to waive the first $2,500 of percentage rent that may become due under the Petro Lease.  The total amount of percentage rent we recognized as expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, was $464 and $1,746 and $222 and $1,277, respectively.  The amount of percentage rent that would have been payable under the Petro Lease for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $90 and $307, respectively; because these amounts were waived, we did not recognize them as an expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Under the HPT Leases, we may request that HPT purchase certain approved renovations, improvements and equipment at the leased locations in return for increases in our minimum annual rent according to the following formula: the minimum rent per year will be increased by an amount equal to the amount paid by HPT multiplied by the greater of (i) 8.5% and (ii) a benchmark U.S. Treasury interest rate plus 3.5%.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, pursuant to the terms of the HPT Leases, we sold to HPT $63,163 of improvements we made to properties leased from HPT, and, as a result, our minimum annual rent payable to HPT increased by approximately $5,369.  As of September 30, 2013, our property and equipment balance included $2,448 for similar improvements we have made to HPT owned sites that we intend to request that HPT purchase from us for an increase in future rent; however, HPT is not obligated to purchase these improvements.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

The following table summarizes the various amounts related to the HPT Leases and leases with other lessors that are reflected in real estate rent expense in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Cash payments for rent under the HPT Leases

 

$

54,637

 

$

51,867

 

$

161,763

 

$

154,973

 

Change in accrued estimated percentage rent

 

(111

)

76

 

473

 

76

 

Adjustments to recognize expense on a straight line basis

 

(483

)

(1,172

)

(1,383

)

(2,306

)

Sale/leaseback financing obligation amortization

 

(525

)

(543

)

(1,547

)

(1,641

)

Rent payments recognized as interest expense

 

(1,757

)

(1,816

)

(5,242

)

(5,436

)

Deferred leasehold improvements allowance amortization

 

(1,692

)

(1,692

)

(5,077

)

(5,077

)

Amortization of deferred gain on sale/leaseback transactions

 

(77

)

(18

)

(230

)

(52

)

Rent expense related to HPT Leases

 

49,992

 

46,702

 

148,757

 

140,537

 

Rent paid to others (1) 

 

2,430

 

2,454

 

7,628

 

7,302

 

Adjustments to recognize expense on a straight line basis for other leases

 

2

 

29

 

27

 

191

 

Total real estate rent expense

 

$

52,424

 

$

49,185

 

$

156,412

 

$

148,030

 

 


(1)         Includes rent paid directly to HPT’s landlords under leases for properties we sublease from HPT as well as rent related to properties we lease from landlords other than HPT.

 

The following table summarizes the various amounts related to the HPT Leases that are included in our balance sheets.

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current HPT Leases liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued rent

 

$

18,057

 

$

17,092

 

Current portion of sale/leaseback financing obligation (1) 

 

2,220

 

2,038

 

Current portion of straight line rent accrual (2) 

 

4,413

 

2,149

 

Current portion of deferred gain on sale/leaseback transactions (3)

 

306

 

306

 

Current portion of deferred tenant improvements allowance (4) 

 

6,769

 

6,769

 

Total Current HPT Leases liabilities

 

$

31,765

 

$

28,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent HPT Leases liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred rent obligation (5) 

 

$

150,000

 

$

150,000

 

Sale/leaseback financing obligation (1) 

 

82,650

 

82,195

 

Straight line rent accrual (2) 

 

51,399

 

55,233

 

Deferred gain on sale/leaseback transactions (3) 

 

2,562

 

2,792

 

Deferred tenant improvements allowance (4) 

 

55,838

 

60,915

 

Total Noncurrent HPT Lease liabilities

 

$

342,449

 

$

351,135

 

 


(1)         Sale/leaseback Financing Obligation.  GAAP governing the transactions related to our entering the TA Lease required us to recognize in our consolidated balance sheet the leased assets at thirteen of the locations previously owned by our predecessor that we now lease from HPT because we subleased more than a minor portion of those locations to third parties, and one location did not qualify for operating lease treatment for other reasons.  Accordingly, we recorded the leased assets at these locations at an amount equal to HPT’s recorded initial carrying amounts, which were equal to their fair values, and recognized an equal amount of liability that is presented as sale/leaseback financing obligation in our consolidated balance sheet.  In addition, sales to HPT of improvements at these locations are accounted for as sale/leaseback financing transactions and these liabilities are increased by the amount of proceeds we receive from HPT.  We recognize a portion of the total rent payments to HPT related to these assets as a reduction of the sale/leaseback financing obligation and a portion as interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.  We determined the allocation of these rent payments to the liability and to interest expense using the effective interest method.  The amounts allocated to interest expense were $1,757 and $1,816 for the three months ended

 

9



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $5,242 and $5,436 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  During 2012, the subleases at four of these locations were terminated, qualifying the related locations for sale leaseback accounting and reducing this liability.  In October 2013, the sublease at another one of these locations was terminated and we began to operate that travel center; this liability balance will be reduced by approximately $2,463 in the fourth quarter as a result.

 

(2)         Straight Line Rent Accrual.  The TA Lease included scheduled rent increases over the first six years of the lease term, as do certain of the leases for properties we sublease from HPT, the rent for which we pay directly to HPT’s landlords.  Also, under our leases with HPT, we are obligated to pay to HPT at lease expiration an amount equal to an estimate of the asset retirement obligation we would have if we owned the underlying assets.  We recognize the effects of scheduled rent increases and the future payment to HPT for asset retirement obligations in real estate rent expense over the lease terms on a straight line basis, with offsetting entries to this accrual balance.

 

(3)         Deferred Gain on Sale/Leaseback Transactions.  This gain arose from the termination during 2012 of subleases for four locations we lease from HPT, as further described in note (1) above, and from the sales of certain assets to HPT.  Under GAAP, the gain or loss from the sale portion of a sale/leaseback transaction is deferred and amortized into real estate rent expense on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.  We expect a gain on sale/leaseback transactions of $434 as a result of the termination in October 2013 of the sublease of a location we lease from HPT, as further described in note (1) above, and that gain will be similarly deferred and amortized.

 

(4)         Deferred Tenant Improvements Allowance.  HPT committed to fund up to $125,000 of capital projects at the sites we lease under the TA Lease without an increase in rent payable by us, which amount HPT had fully funded by September 30, 2010, net of discounting to reflect our accelerated receipt of those funds. In connection with this commitment, we recognized a liability for the rent deemed to be related to this tenant improvements allowance.  This deferred tenant improvements allowance was initially recorded at an amount equal to the leasehold improvements receivable we recognized for the discounted value of the then expected future amounts to be received from HPT, based upon our then expected timing of receipt of those payments.  We amortize the deferred tenant improvements allowance on a straight line basis over the term of the TA Lease as a reduction of real estate rent expense.

 

(5)         Deferred Rent Obligation.  Pursuant to a rent deferral agreement with HPT, through December 31, 2010, we deferred a total of $150,000 of rent payable to HPT.  The deferred rent obligation is payable in two installments, $107,085 in December 2022 and $42,915 in June 2024.  This obligation does not bear interest, unless certain events of default or other events occur, including a change of control of us.

 

On April 15, 2013, we entered an agreement with Equilon Enterprises LLC doing business as Shell Oil Products US, or Shell, pursuant to which Shell has agreed to construct a network of natural gas fueling lanes at up to 100 of our travel centers located along the U.S. interstate highway system, including locations we lease from HPT.  In connection with that agreement, on April 15, 2013, we and HPT amended the HPT Leases to revise the calculation of percentage rent payable by us under the HPT Leases, with the intended effect that the amount of percentage rent be unaffected by the type of fuel sold, whether diesel fuel or natural gas.  That amendment also made certain administrative changes.  Also on that date, in order to facilitate our agreement with Shell, HPT entered into a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement with Shell, whereby HPT agreed to recognize Shell’s license and other rights with respect to the natural gas fueling lanes at our HPT leased locations on certain conditions and in certain circumstances.

 

On July 1, 2013, HPT purchased land that was previously leased by HPT from a third party and subleased to us under the TA Lease.  Effective as of that date, rents due to that third party and our paying of those rents on behalf of HPT under the terms of the TA Lease ceased.  Also on that date, we and HPT amended the TA Lease to reflect our direct lease from HPT of that land and certain minor properties adjacent to existing travel centers included in the TA Lease purchased by HPT and to increase annual rent by $537, which was 8.5% of HPT’s investment.

 

One of the travel centers we leased from HPT under the TA Lease, located in Roanoke, VA, was taken in August 2013 by eminent domain proceedings brought by the Virginia Department of Transportation, or VDOT, in connection with certain highway construction.  The TA Lease provides that it terminates with respect to a property upon a taking of the property as the result of any eminent domain proceeding.  Under the terms of the TA Lease, the annual rent payable by us is reduced by 8.5% of the amount of the proceeds HPT receives from that taking or, at HPT’s option, the fair market value rent of the property.  There are ongoing negotiations among VDOT, HPT, and us regarding the amount of compensation to be paid for the taking and regarding a possible short term lease of the property to HPT, for sublease to us.  We expect that we will continue to operate this travel center pursuant to a sublease until October 2014.  VDOT’s estimate of fair market value for the taking is $6,280.  We and HPT have engaged an appraiser to review VDOT’s estimate.  Given the preliminary stages of these negotiations, there can be no assurance concerning what additional

 

10



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

compensation, if any, would be payable to us or HPT as a result of the taking or what leasing arrangements, if any, will be entered into and the date at which we will cease to operate this travel center.

 

Relationship with RMR

 

Reit Management & Research LLC, or RMR, provides business management and shared services to us pursuant to a business management and shared services agreement, or our business management agreement.  RMR also provides building management services to us for our headquarters building pursuant to a property management agreement.  Under our business management agreement with RMR, we acknowledge that RMR also provides management services to other companies, including HPT.  One of our Managing Directors, Mr. Barry Portnoy, is Chairman, majority owner and an employee of RMR.  Mr. Barry Portnoy’s son, Mr. Adam Portnoy, is an owner of RMR and serves as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of RMR.  Our other Managing Director, Mr. Thomas O’Brien, who is also our President and Chief Executive Officer, is also an Executive Vice President of RMR.  Mr. Andrew Rebholz, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and Mr. Mark Young, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, are Senior Vice Presidents of RMR.  HPT’s executive officers are officers of RMR.  A majority of our Independent Directors also serve as independent directors or independent trustees of other public companies to which RMR or its affiliates provide management services.  Mr. Barry Portnoy serves as a managing director or managing trustee of those companies, including HPT, and Mr. Adam Portnoy serves as a managing trustee of a majority of those companies, including HPT.  In addition, officers of RMR serve as officers of those companies.

 

Pursuant to our business management agreement and property management agreement with RMR, we incurred aggregate fees of $2,993 and $2,791 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $8,408 and $7,904 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Relationship with AIC

 

We, RMR, HPT and five other companies to which RMR provides management services each currently own 12.5% of Affiliates Insurance Company, or AIC, an Indiana insurance company.  All of our Directors, all of the trustees and directors of the other publicly held AIC shareholders and nearly all of the directors of RMR currently serve on the board of directors of AIC.  RMR provides management and administrative services to AIC pursuant to a management and administrative services agreement with AIC.  As of September 30, 2013, we have invested $5,229 in AIC since its formation in 2008.  Although we own less than 20% of AIC, we use the equity method to account for this investment because we believe that we have significant influence over AIC because all of our Directors are also directors of AIC.  Our investment in AIC had a carrying value of $5,781 and $5,629 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  We recognized income of $64 and $115 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $219 and $236 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, arising from our investment in AIC.  We and the other shareholders of AIC have purchased property insurance providing $500,000 of coverage pursuant to an insurance program arranged by AIC and with respect to which AIC is a reinsurer of certain coverage amounts.  This program was modified and extended in June 2013 for a one year term and we paid a premium, including taxes and fees, of $2,743 in connection with that renewal, which amount may be adjusted from time to time as we acquire or dispose of properties that are included in that program.  We periodically consider the possibilities for expanding our insurance relationships with AIC to include other types of insurance and may in the future participate in additional insurance offerings AIC may provide or arrange.  We may invest additional amounts in AIC in the future if the expansion of this insurance business requires additional capital, but we are not obligated to do so.  By participating in this insurance business with RMR and the other companies to which RMR provides management services, we expect that we may benefit financially by possibly reducing our insurance expenses or by realizing our pro-rata share of any profits of this insurance business.

 

Relationship with PTP

 

Petro Travel Plaza Holdings LLC, or PTP, is a joint venture between us and Tejon Development Corporation, or Tejon, that owns two travel centers in California.  We own a 40% interest in PTP and operate the two locations PTP owns for which we receive management and accounting fees.  The carrying value of the investment in PTP as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $17,131 and $15,332, respectively.  We recognized management and accounting fee income of $200 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and $600 for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.  At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had a net payable to PTP of $675 and $575, respectively.  We recognized income of $795 and $686 during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $1,799 and $1,027 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to this investment.  In the first nine months of 2012, we received $4,800 of

 

11



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

distributions from PTP that represented a return on our investment; accordingly, this distribution is included in cash provided by operating activities in the accompanying statement of cash flows.

 

8.                                      Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments

 

As of September 30, 2013, we had entered agreements to acquire four travel center properties for a total of approximately $20,462.  We completed two of these acquisitions in October 2013 for a total of $8,862.  We expect to complete the other acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2013, but these purchases are subject to conditions and may not occur, may be delayed or the terms may change.

 

Guarantees

 

In the normal course of our business we periodically enter into agreements that contain guarantees or indemnification provisions.  While we cannot estimate the maximum amount to which we may be exposed under these agreements, we do not believe that any potential guaranty or indemnification is likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

We offer a warranty of our workmanship in our truck service facilities; the annual warranty expense and corresponding liability are not material to us.

 

Environmental Matters

 

Extensive environmental laws regulate our operations and properties.  These laws may require us to investigate and clean up hazardous substances, including petroleum products, released at our owned and leased properties.  Governmental entities or third parties may hold us liable for property damage and personal injuries, and for investigation, remediation and monitoring costs incurred in connection with any contamination and regulatory compliance.  We use both underground storage tanks and above ground storage tanks to store petroleum products and waste at our locations.  We must comply with environmental laws regarding tank construction, integrity testing, leak detection and monitoring, overfill and spill control, release reporting and financial assurance for corrective action in the event of a release.  At some locations we must also comply with environmental laws relative to vapor recovery or discharges to water.  Under the terms of our leases, we generally have agreed to indemnify HPT for any environmental liabilities related to locations that we lease from HPT and we are required to pay all environmental related expenses incurred in the operation of the locations.

 

From time to time we have received, and in the future likely will receive, notices of alleged violations of environmental laws or otherwise have become or will become aware of the need to undertake corrective actions to comply with environmental laws at our locations.  Investigatory and remedial actions were, and regularly are, undertaken with respect to releases of hazardous substances at our locations.  In some cases we received, and may receive, contributions to partially offset our environmental costs from insurers, from state funds established for environmental clean up associated with the sale of petroleum products or from indemnitors who agreed to fund certain environmental related costs at locations purchased from those indemnitors.  To the extent we incur material amounts for environmental matters for which we do not receive insurance or other third party reimbursement or for which we have not previously recorded a reserve, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.  In addition, to the extent we fail to comply with environmental laws and regulations, or we become subject to costs and requirements not similarly experienced by our competitors, our competitive position may be harmed.

 

At September 30, 2013, we had a gross accrued liability of $8,299 for environmental matters as well as a receivable for expected recoveries of certain of these estimated future expenditures of $2,169, resulting in an estimated net amount of $6,130 that we expect to need to fund in the future.  We do not have a reserve for unknown current or potential future environmental matters.  Accrued liabilities related to environmental matters are recorded on an undiscounted basis because of the uncertainty associated with the timing of the related future payments.  We cannot precisely know the ultimate costs we will incur in connection with currently known or future potential environmental related violations, corrective actions, investigation and remediation; however, based on our

 

12



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

current knowledge we do not expect that our net costs for such matters to be incurred at our locations, individually or in the aggregate, would be material to our financial condition or results of operations.

 

We have insurance of up to $10,000 for certain environmental liabilities at certain of our locations that were known at the time the policies were issued, and up to $40,000 for certain environmental liabilities not known by us at the time the policies were issued, subject, in each case, to certain limitations and deductibles.  However, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to maintain similar environmental insurance coverage in the future on acceptable terms.

 

While the costs of our environmental compliance in the past have not had a material adverse impact on us, it is impossible to predict the ultimate effect changing circumstances and changing environmental laws may have on us in the future or the ultimate outcome of matters currently pending.  We cannot be certain that contamination presently unknown to us does not exist at our sites, or that material liability will not be imposed on us in the future.  If we discover additional environmental issues, or if government agencies impose additional environmental requirements, increased environmental compliance or remediation expenditures may be required, which could have a material adverse effect on us.  In addition, legislation and regulation regarding climate change, including greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental matters may be adopted or administered and enforced differently in the future, which could adversely affect our business or require us to expend significant amounts.  For instance, federal and state governmental requirements addressing emissions from trucks and other motor vehicles, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s gasoline and diesel sulfur control requirements that limit the concentration of sulfur in motor vehicle gasoline and diesel fuel, could negatively impact our business and has caused us to add certain services and provide certain products to our customers.  Further, legislation and regulations that limit carbon emissions also may cause our energy costs at our locations to increase.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

In May 2010, the California Attorney General commenced litigation on behalf of the California State Water Resources Control Board against various defendants, including us, HPT TA Properties Trust (which is a subsidiary of HPT), PTP and Tejon in the Superior Court of California for Alameda County seeking unspecified civil penalties and injunctive relief for alleged violations of underground storage tank laws and regulations at various facilities in Kern and Merced Counties, which alleged violations do not include release of contamination into the environment.  On July 26, 2010, the California Attorney General voluntarily dismissed this litigation against us and the other named defendants, and on September 2, 2010, refiled its complaint against the same defendants in the Superior Court of California for Merced County, seeking unspecified civil penalties and injunctive relief.  We have denied the material allegations in the complaint and asserted various affirmative defenses.  The parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations.  We intend to defend this lawsuit if a settlement is not reached.  Under the TA Lease and our expired lease agreement with Tejon for a location that was closed in 2009, we are liable to indemnify HPT TA Properties Trust and Tejon for any liabilities, costs and expenses they incur in connection with this litigation.  We have accrued an estimated loss for this matter and believe that the additional amount of loss we may realize, if any, upon the ultimate resolution of this matter in excess of the amount we have accrued will not be material to us.

 

Beginning in December 2006, a series of class action lawsuits was filed against numerous companies in the petroleum industry, including our predecessor and our subsidiaries, in U.S. district courts in over 20 states.  Major petroleum refiners and retailers were named as defendants in one or more of these lawsuits.  The plaintiffs in the lawsuits generally allege that they are retail purchasers who purchased motor fuel at temperatures greater than 60 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of sale.  One theory alleges that the plaintiffs purchased smaller amounts of motor fuel than the amount for which defendants charged them because the defendants measured the amount of motor fuel they delivered by volumes which, at higher temperatures, contain less energy.  A second theory alleges that fuel taxes are calculated in temperature adjusted 60 degree gallons and are collected by governmental agencies from suppliers and wholesalers, who are reimbursed in the amount of the tax by the defendant retailers before the fuel is sold to consumers.  These “tax” cases allege that, when the fuel is subsequently sold to consumers at temperatures above 60 degrees, the retailers sell a greater volume of fuel than the amount on which they paid tax, and therefore reap unjust benefit because the customers pay more tax than the retailer pays.  A third theory, advanced more recently in connection with plaintiffs’ request for class certification, alleges that all purchasers of fuel at any temperature are harmed because the defendants do not use equipment that adjusts for temperature or disclose the temperature of fuel being sold, and thereby deprive customers of information they allegedly require to make an informed purchasing decision.  We believe that there are substantial factual and legal defenses to the theories alleged in these so called “hot fuel” lawsuits.  The “temperature” cases seek nonmonetary relief in the form of an order requiring the defendants to install devices that display the temperature of the fuel and/or temperature correcting equipment on their retail fuel pumps and monetary relief in the form of damages, but the plaintiffs have not quantified the damages they seek.  The “tax” cases also seek monetary relief.  Plaintiffs have proposed a formula (which we dispute) to measure these damages as the difference between the amount of fuel excise taxes paid by defendants and the amount collected by defendants on motor fuel sales.  Plaintiffs have taken the position in Court filings that under this approach, our damages for an eight-year period for one state would be approximately $10,700.  We deny liability and

 

13



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

disagree with the plaintiffs’ positions.  All of these cases have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas pursuant to multi-district litigation procedures.  On May 28, 2010, that Court ruled that, with respect to two cases originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, it would grant plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class of plaintiffs seeking injunctive relief (implementation of fuel temperature equipment and/or posting of notices regarding the effect of temperature on fuel).  On January 19, 2012, the Court amended its prior ruling, and certified a class with respect to plaintiffs’ claims for damages as well.  A TA entity was named in one of those two Kansas cases, but the Court ruled that the named plaintiffs were not sufficient to represent a class as to TA.  TA was thereafter dismissed from the Kansas case, and TA entities have been dismissed voluntarily from several other cases as well.  Several defendants in the Kansas cases, including major petroleum refiners, have entered into multi-state settlements.  Following a September 2012 trial against the remaining defendants in the Kansas cases, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of those Kansas defendants, and the judge likewise ruled in the Kansas defendants’ favor on the sole non-jury claim.  In early 2013, the Court announced its intention to remand three cases originally filed in federal district courts in California back to their original courts.  A TA entity is named in one of these three California cases.  On April 9, 2013, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in the California cases.  On August 14, 2013, the Court granted summary judgment for the defendants with respect to all California claims in the California cases.  Since that time, the parties have entered stipulations of dismissal with all but one Plaintiff in one of the California cases, who continues to assert claims based on purchases of fuel in states other than California.  The Court has not issued a decision on class certification or motions for summary judgment with respect to those remaining claims in the California case or with respect to the remaining cases that have been consolidated in the multi-district litigation.  We cannot estimate our ultimate exposure to loss or liability, if any, related to these lawsuits, but, the continued costs to defend these cases could be significant.

 

On April 6, 2009, five independent truck stop owners, who are plaintiffs in a purported class action suit against Comdata Network, Inc., or Comdata, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, filed a motion to amend their complaint to add us as a defendant, which was allowed on March 25, 2010.  The amended complaint also added as defendants Ceridian Corporation, Pilot Travel Centers LLC and Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.  Comdata markets fuel cards which are used for payments by trucking companies at truck stops.  The amended complaint alleged antitrust violations arising out of Comdata’s contractual relationships with truck stops in connection with its fuel cards.  The plaintiffs have sought unspecified damages and injunctive relief.  On March 24, 2011, the Court dismissed the claims against TA in the amended complaint, but granted plaintiffs leave to file a new amended complaint.  Four independent truck stop owners, as plaintiffs, filed a new amended complaint against us on April 21, 2011, repleading their claims.  On May 6, 2011, we renewed our motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice while discovery otherwise proceeded.  The Court denied our renewed motion to dismiss on March 29, 2012, and we filed an answer to the complaint on April 30, 2012.  The Court has set a schedule that provides that trial shall begin on August 4, 2014.  We believe that there are substantial factual and legal defenses to the plaintiffs’ claims against us.  We cannot estimate our ultimate exposure to loss or liability, if any, related to this lawsuit, but the continued costs to defend this case could be significant.

 

In addition to the legal proceedings referenced above, we are routinely involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings, including tax audits incidental to the ordinary course of our business, none of which we expect, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

9.                                      Income Taxes

 

Because we do not have sufficient history of generating taxable income we do not currently recognize in our income tax provision the future benefit of our deferred tax assets, including the tax benefit associated with our loss carry forwards from prior years by establishing a valuation allowance related to these deferred tax assets.  We will continue to assess our ability to generate taxable income during future periods in which our deferred tax assets may be realized.  If and when we believe it is more likely than not that we will recover our deferred tax assets, we will reverse the valuation allowance as an income tax benefit in our consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income, which will affect our results of operations.  As a result of certain trading in our shares during 2007, our 2007 federal net operating loss of $49,740 and other tax credit carry forwards are generally not available to us for the purpose of offsetting future taxable income because of certain Internal Revenue Code provisions regarding changes in ownership of our common shares.  As of December 31, 2012, we had an unrestricted federal net operating loss carry forward of approximately $108,250.  Our federal net operating loss carryforward and tax credits and the majority of our state net operating loss carry forwards will begin to expire in 2027.  Certain of our other state net operating loss carry forwards began to expire in 2012.  In addition, certain states do not permit the use of net operating loss carry forwards.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recognized tax expense of $1,074 and $429, respectively, which included tax expense of $740 and $213, respectively, for certain state taxes based on operating income that are payable without regard to our tax loss carry forwards.  Tax expense also included $334 and $216 in the third quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a noncash deferred liability arising from foreign currency translation adjustments that do not offset our deferred tax assets and from the amortization of indefinite lived intangible assets for tax purposes but not for GAAP purposes.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recognized tax expense of $1,626 and $1,062, respectively, which included tax expense of $1,111 and $637, respectively, for certain state taxes based on operating income that are payable without regard to our tax loss carry forwards.  Tax expense also included $515 and $425 in the first nine months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to a noncash deferred liability arising from foreign currency translation adjustments that do not offset our deferred tax assets and from the amortization of indefinite lived intangible assets for tax purposes but not for GAAP purposes.

 

In measuring our deferred tax assets, we considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed for all or a portion of our deferred tax assets.  Judgment is required in considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence.  The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified.  The more negative evidence that exists, the more positive evidence is necessary and the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is unnecessary.  In order to assess the likelihood of realizing the benefit of these deferred tax assets, we are required to rely on our projections of future income.  We believe that our history of losses coupled with the fact that we have a short history of operating profits that is limited to 2011 and 2012, creates sufficient negative evidence such that we are unable to conclude that realization of the benefit is more likely than not.  As a result, we have concluded that it is appropriate to maintain a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets until our profitability becomes more predictable.  We may reverse some or all of the valuation allowance when we believe that we will more likely than not realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets.  At that time, we will record deferred tax assets as an income tax benefit in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, which will affect our results of operations.  If our profitability realized since January 1, 2011, continues, our estimates and assumptions regarding the valuation allowance may change in the future.

 

10.                               Other Information

 

Interest expense consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Interest related to our Senior Notes and Credit Facility

 

$

2,731

 

$

535

 

$

7,845

 

$

1,605

 

HPT rent classified as interest

 

1,757

 

1,816

 

5,242

 

5,436

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

171

 

89

 

496

 

263

 

Capitalized interest

 

(166

)

 

(806

)

 

Other

 

21

 

198

 

232

 

328

 

Interest expense

 

$

4,514

 

$

2,638

 

$

13,009

 

$

7,632

 

 

We capitalize a portion of the interest expense incurred on our Senior Notes that is attributable under GAAP to our more significant construction projects over the duration of the respective construction periods.  Capitalized interest is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the life of the corresponding asset.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Overview (dollars in thousands)

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or this Quarterly Report, and in our Annual Report.

 

Our revenues and income are subject to potentially material changes as a result of the market prices and availability of fuel.  These factors are subject to the worldwide petroleum products supply chain, which historically has incurred price and supply volatility and, in some cases, shocks as a result of, among other things, severe weather, terrorism, political crises, wars and other military actions and variations in demand, which are often the result of changes in the macroeconomic environment.  Over the past few years there has been significant volatility in the cost of fuel.  During the first half of 2012, fuel prices generally declined due to global economic concerns, including economic conditions in Europe.  However, during the third quarter of 2012 fuel prices generally rose due to tensions in the Middle East and economic stimulus programs in Europe and elsewhere.  During the fourth quarter of 2012, fuel prices declined and at the end of 2012 were near the prices we experienced at the end of 2011.  During the first quarter of 2013, prices generally declined and were at a lower level than the prices experienced during the first quarter of 2012.  During the second quarter of 2013, fuel prices again rose and at the end of the second quarter of 2013 approximated the prices we experienced at the end of the second quarter of 2012.  Then, during the third quarter of 2013, fuel prices again rose, but were generally at a lower level than the prices experienced during the third quarter of 2012.  Also, recent gains in fuel supplies and sources within the United States and Canada have helped to maintain relative market price stability, but as export markets and capabilities increase for fuel that price stabilization factor may be less effective.  We expect that changes in our costs for fuel products can largely be passed on to our customers, but often there are delays in passing on price changes that can affect our fuel gross margins.  Although other factors have an effect, during periods of rising fuel commodity prices fuel gross margins per gallon tend to be lower than they otherwise may have been, and during periods of falling fuel commodity prices fuel gross margins per gallon tend to increase.  Also, fuel price increases and volatility can have negative effects on our sales and profitability and increase our working capital requirements.  We expect that the fuel markets will continue to be volatile for the foreseeable future.  For more information about fuel market risks that may affect us and our actions to mitigate those risks, see Part II, Item 4, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this Quarterly Report and Part II, Item 7A, “Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report.

 

The condition of the U.S. economy generally, and the financial condition and activity of the trucking industry in the U.S. specifically, impacted our financial results during the first nine months of 2013, and we expect that they will continue to impact our financial results in future periods.  The trucking industry is the primary customer for our goods and services.  Freight and trucking demand in the U.S. historically generally reflects the level of commercial activity in the U.S. economy. During 2012 and the first half of 2013, the U.S. economy slowly improved and the financial condition and activity level in the trucking industry similarly slowly improved, but these improvements appear to be uneven and may not affect all market participants equally.  We believe that during the third quarter of 2013, demand for fuel by trucking companies was negatively affected as compared to the prior year by the new hours of service rules for truck drivers, which went into effect in July 2013, and the driver shortage plaguing the trucking industry as these factors increase trucking company costs causing trucking companies to focus on fuel efficiency and shippers to divert some business away from trucking.  Technological innovations and other regulatory changes permitting and requiring improved fuel efficiency of motor vehicle engines and other fuel conservation practices employed by trucking companies also continue to reduce the demand for diesel fuel that might otherwise exist for a given level of trucking miles driven.

 

In part as a result of the aforesaid factors, our nonfuel revenues in the first nine months of 2013 increased on a same site basis over the prior year, but fuel sales volumes on a same site basis for the 2013 first nine months declined compared to the prior year and the level of fuel sales volume continues to be below that experienced before the recent U.S. economic recession, which we believe began to impact the trucking industry in late 2007.  Despite the year over year declines in fuel sales volumes, our fuel gross margins per gallon for the 2013 first nine months increased slightly on a same site basis over the prior year.  We believe this trend primarily is attributable to our continued focus on managing our fuel pricing to balance sales volume and profitability considerations.  Also, during the second and third quarters of 2013, TA’s primary competitors engaged in aggressive sales efforts to maintain and grow market share, which negatively impacted our fuel sales volume and fuel gross margin per gallon during this time period.  These aggressive sales efforts by our competitors appear to have abated somewhat in the third quarter versus the second quarter.

 

The decline in net income that we experienced during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same periods of the prior year is largely due to increases in depreciation and amortization expense attributable to the travel center acquisitions and other capital investments we made during 2012 and 2013 and the related acquisition and financing costs. Since the beginning of 2011, we have invested $216,916 to acquire and improve 26 travel center properties.  The operations at many of the 26 locations acquired during those periods have not yet reached the stabilized levels we currently expect.  From the time of their acquisition by TA, during the three, nine and twelve month periods ended September 30, 2013, these 26 properties generated gross revenues in excess of cost of goods sold and site level operating expenses of $7,599, $17,652 and $19,272, respectively, compared to $1,580, $4,023 and $5,182 for the three, nine and twelve month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively.  We believe that the

 

16



Table of Contents

 

improvements we have made and plan to make at these locations may continue to improve the financial results at these locations in the future.  The improvements to properties we acquire are often substantial and require a long period of time to plan, design, permit and complete, and after completed then require a period of time to produce stabilized financial results.  We estimate that the travel centers we acquire generally will reach financial stabilization in approximately the third year after acquisition, but the actual result can vary widely from this estimate due to many factors.

 

We believe that recent U.S. economic data has been mixed and the strength and sustainability of any economic expansion is uncertain.  If the U.S. economy continues to operate as it has over the past few years or if it worsens, our financial results may not improve and may decline, resulting in our experiencing losses.

 

There can be no assurance that industry conditions will not deteriorate or that any one or more of the risks identified under the sections “Risk Factors,” “Warning Concerning Forward Looking Statements” or elsewhere in our Annual Report; under the section “Warning Concerning Forward Looking Statements” or elsewhere in this Quarterly Report; or some other unidentified risk will not manifest itself in a manner which is material and adverse to our results of operations, cash flow or financial position.

 

Number of Sites

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the number of sites (company operated and franchisee operated) from December 31, 2011 through September 30, 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Franchisee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Owned

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Franchisee

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

Operated

 

Operated

 

Operated

 

Total

 

Number of locations at December 31, 2011

 

194

 

10

 

33

 

237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January - September 2012 Activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired locations

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Acquisition of franchised locations

 

5

 

(1

)

(4

)

 

Number of locations at September 30, 2012

 

204

 

9

 

29

 

242

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October - December 2012 Activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired locations

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Acquisition of franchised locations

 

3

 

(3

)

 

 

Number of locations at December 31, 2012

 

208

 

6

 

29

 

243

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January — September 2013 Activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired locations

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Acquisition of franchised locations

 

2

 

 

(2

)

 

Number of locations at September 30, 2013

 

214

 

6

 

27

 

247

 

 

In October 2013, we terminated the franchise agreement at one location and we began to operate that travel center.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Operating Segment

 

We manage our business on the basis of one operating segment.  Please refer to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report for revenue, operating profit and asset data.  We have only a single travel center located in a foreign country, Canada, and we consider the revenues and assets related to our operations in Canada to be not material to us.  The following table sets forth the composition of our total revenues by type for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

80.8

%

81.9

%

81.6

%

83.0

%

Nonfuel

 

19.0

%

17.9

%

18.2

%

16.8

%

Rent and royalties from franchisees

 

0.2

%

0.2

%

0.2

%

0.2

%

Total revenues

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

 

Relevance of Fuel Revenues

 

Due to volatile pricing of fuel products purchases and our pricing of fuel products to customers, we believe that fuel revenue is not a reliable basis for analyzing our results of operations from period to period.  As a result solely of changes in commodity fuel prices, our fuel revenue may materially increase or decrease, in both absolute amounts and on a percentage basis, without a comparable change in fuel sales volumes or in fuel gross margin.  We consider fuel volumes and fuel gross margin to be better measures of comparative performance than fuel revenues.  However, fuel pricing and revenues can materially impact our working capital requirements; see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Results of Operations (dollars in thousands)

 

Three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to September 30, 2012

 

The following table presents changes in our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

$

 

%

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

$

1,667,464

 

$

1,666,810

 

$

654

 

%

Nonfuel

 

391,319

 

363,402

 

27,917

 

7.7

%

Rent and royalties

 

3,313

 

3,941

 

(628

)

(15.9

)%

Total revenues

 

2,062,096

 

2,034,153

 

27,943

 

1.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

1,576,118

 

1,581,830

 

(5,712

)

(0.4

)%

Nonfuel

 

178,837

 

164,017

 

14,820

 

9.0

%

Total cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation)

 

1,754,955

 

1,745,847

 

9,108

 

0.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site level operating expenses

 

195,428

 

179,737

 

15,691

 

8.7

%

Selling, general & administrative expense

 

23,705

 

25,577

 

(1,872

)

(7.3

)%

Real estate rent

 

52,424

 

49,185

 

3,239

 

6.6

%

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

14,646

 

12,874

 

1,772

 

13.8

%

Total operating expenses

 

286,203

 

267,373

 

18,830

 

7.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

20,938

 

20,933

 

5

 

%

Income from equity investees

 

859

 

801

 

58

 

7.2

%

Acquisition costs

 

(1,026

)

(189

)

(837

)

442.9

%

Interest income

 

620

 

512

 

108

 

21.1

%

Interest expense

 

(4,514

)

(2,638

)

(1,876

)

71.1

%

Income before income taxes

 

16,877

 

19,419

 

(2,542

)

(13.1

)%

Provision for income taxes

 

1,074

 

429

 

645

 

150.3

%

Net income

 

$

15,803

 

$

18,990

 

$

(3,187

)

(16.8

)%

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Same Site Comparisons. As part of this discussion and analysis of our operating results we refer to increases and decreases in results on a same site basis.  For purposes of these comparisons, we include a location in the following same site comparisons only if we continuously operated it from July 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013, or, for rent and royalty revenues, if during that period the location was continuously operated by one of our franchisees.  We do not exclude locations from the same site comparisons as a result of expansions in their size, capital improvements to the site or changes in the services offered.  The table below excludes the data of two locations TA operates that are owned by a joint venture and one company operated site that was temporarily closed during parts of the period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

$

 

Favorable/

 

(gallons and dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

(Unfavorable)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of company operated locations

 

195

 

195

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel sales volume (gallons)

 

478,374

 

485,129

 

(6,755

)

(1.4

)%

Fuel revenues

 

$

1,535,620

 

$

1,583,090

 

$

(47,470

)

(3.0

)%

Fuel gross margin

 

$

86,085

 

$

83,009

 

$

3,076

 

3.7

%

Fuel gross margin per gallon

 

$

0.180

 

$

0.171

 

$

0.009

 

5.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonfuel: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonfuel revenues

 

$

370,661

 

$

359,009

 

$

11,652

 

3.2

%

Nonfuel gross margin

 

$

201,246

 

$

197,118

 

$

4,128

 

2.1

%

Nonfuel gross margin percentage

 

54.3

%

54.9

%

 

 

(60

)pts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gross margin

 

$

287,331

 

$

280,127

 

$

7,204

 

2.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site level operating expenses (1) 

 

$

184,336

 

$

176,858

 

$

7,478

 

4.2

%

Site level operating expenses as a percentage of nonfuel revenues(1) 

 

49.7

%

49.3

%

 

 

(40

)pts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site level gross margin in excess of site level operating expenses(1)

 

$

102,995

 

$

103,269

 

$

(274

)

(0.3

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of franchisee operated locations

 

33

 

33

 

 

 

Rent and royalty revenues

 

$

3,357

 

$

3,186

 

$

171

 

5.4

%

 


(1)                   Includes fuel volume, gross margin, revenues and expenses of locations that were company operated during the entirety of each of the periods presented.

 

Revenues.  Revenues for the three month period ended September 30, 2013, were $2,062,096, which represented an increase from the quarter ended September 30, 2012, of $27,943, or 1.4%, primarily resulting from an increase in nonfuel revenue.

 

Fuel revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, were $1,667,464, essentially unchanged from the same period in 2012.  The table below shows the changes in fuel revenues between periods that resulted from price and volume changes:

 

20



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Gallons

 

Fuel

 

(gallons and dollars in thousands)

 

Sold

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results for three months ended September 30, 2012

 

511,373

 

$

1,666,810

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease due to petroleum products price changes

 

 

(25,349

)

Decrease due to same site volume changes

 

(6,755

)

(22,626

)

Increase due to locations opened

 

25,466

 

81,401

 

Decrease in wholesale sales to nonfranchisees

 

(749

)

(2,468

)

Decrease in sales to franchisees on a wholesale basis

 

(9,362

)

(30,304

)

Net change from prior year period

 

8,600

 

654

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results for three months ended September 30, 2013

 

519,973

 

$

1,667,464

 

 

Fuel revenue for the 2013 period reflected increases in sales volume due to sites we acquired since October 1, 2012, largely offset by declines in fuel volume sold on a wholesale basis to franchisees, lower market prices for fuel and declines in same site sales volume, as compared to the prior year period.  The decreased level of sales volume to franchisees resulted from the sublease renewals we entered into with our franchisees in the second half of 2012 that eliminated the requirement that these subtenants purchase their diesel fuel from us.  On a same site basis, fuel sales volume for our company operated locations decreased by 6,755 gallons, or 1.4%, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.  We believe that the effect on miles driven and truck utilization of the new truck driver hours of services rules, the trend of improved fuel efficiency of heavy truck engines and other fuel conservation efforts by trucking customers and our decision to avoid certain lower margin fuel sales contributed to decreased same site fuel sales volume despite the slight and slow improvement in the U.S. economy.  In addition, as noted above under “Overview,” competitive pressures from other industry participants also affected our fuel sales volume.

 

Nonfuel revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013, were $391,319, an increase of $27,917, or 7.7%, compared to the same period in 2012.  The majority of the change between periods resulted from an increase in revenues at those sites we acquired since July 1, 2012, but also reflected a same site nonfuel revenue increase.  On a same site basis for our company operated sites, nonfuel revenues increased by $11,652, or 3.2%, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.  We believe the same site nonfuel revenue increase reflects increased customer spending due to increased customer traffic, certain price increases we have instituted as a result of increased prices we paid for nonfuel inventory purchases and the effects of certain of our marketing initiatives.

 

Rent and royalty revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013, were $3,313, a decrease of $628, or 15.9%, compared to the same period in 2012.  Rent and royalties decreased largely as a result of our acquisitions during 2012 and 2013 of ten franchise locations that we now operate, including four that we had subleased to a franchisee.  This decrease was partially offset by increased rents that became effective during the second half of 2012 at six sites we subleased to franchisees.  In October 2013, the sublease for one of these six sites was terminated and we began to operate that travel center.

 

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation). Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $1,754,955, an increase of $9,108, or 0.5%, compared to the same period in 2012.

 

Fuel cost of goods sold for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, of $1,576,118, decreased by $5,712, or 0.4%, compared to the same period in 2012.  This decrease in fuel cost of goods sold primarily resulted from the decrease in same site fuel sales volumes and the decrease in fuel sold to franchisees on a wholesale basis, partially offset by sales volume growth due to sites we acquired during 2012 and 2013.  The fuel gross margin per gallon of $0.180 on a same site basis for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $0.009 per gallon higher than for the same period of 2012, primarily as a result of variations in market prices for fuel (while prices increased in both periods, the increase in the 2012 third quarter was much larger), competitive conditions within our industry and our decision to forgo certain low margin sales.  In addition, during the third quarter of 2013 we recognized $553 as a reduction of our fuel cost of sales due to refunds we received from certain suppliers in connection with biodiesel tax credits related to certain purchases made from those suppliers during 2012.  On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 became law and reinstated retroactively to January 1, 2012, the “Blender’s Credit for Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel”.  This credit had previously expired on December 31, 2011, and, accordingly, we did not recognize any benefit related to it in our 2012 operating results.  During the first six months of 2013, we recognized $3,334 as a reduction of our fuel cost of sales in connection with these credits.

 

Nonfuel cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $178,837, an increase of $14,820, or 9.0%, compared to the same period in 2012.  Nonfuel cost of goods sold increased primarily due to the nonfuel sales increases noted above, combined with increases in product unit costs.  Nonfuel gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $212,482, compared to $199,385 during the same period of 2012.  Nonfuel gross margin was 54.3% and 54.9% of nonfuel revenues during the third quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The nonfuel gross margin percentage decreased largely as a result of a change in the

 

21



Table of Contents

 

mix of products and services sold, as well as increases in our cost of tires that we were not able to pass on with corresponding higher sales prices charged to our customers.

 

Site level operating expenses.  Site level operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013, were $195,428, an increase of $15,691, or 8.7%, compared to the same period in 2012.  The increase in site level operating expenses was primarily due to the locations we acquired during 2012 and 2013, including $337 of start up expenses at these sites.

 

On a same site basis for our company operated sites, site level operating expenses increased by $7,478, or 4.2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to labor costs that increased as the level of nonfuel sales grew and increased utilities expenses.  Site level operating expenses as a percentage of nonfuel revenues on a same site basis for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, were 49.7%, compared to 49.3% for the same period in 2012.  The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of nonfuel revenues on a same site basis was due to variations in certain expense categories such as transaction fees, environmental charges, and miscellaneous losses that do not necessarily vary with the level of nonfuel sales.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013, were $23,705, compared to $25,577 during the same period of 2012, a decrease of $1,872, or 7.3%.  The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily the result of decreased litigation expenses, partially offset by increased personnel costs.

 

Real estate rent expense.  Rent expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $52,424, an increase of $3,239 compared to the same period in 2012 that is attributable to rent increases related to improvements acquired by HPT since July 1, 2012, and increases in percentage rent recognized under the HPT Leases based on increases in 2013 fuel and nonfuel revenues over base amounts.

 

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $14,646, an increase of $1,772, or 13.8%, compared to the same period in 2012, that primarily resulted from the location acquisitions and other capital investments we completed (and did not subsequently sell to HPT) during 2012 and 2013.

 

Acquisition costs.  Acquisition costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013, were $1,026, an increase of $837, or 442.9%, compared to the same period in 2012, that primarily resulted from costs incurred for the legal and due diligence activities associated with our consideration of possible acquisitions, including closed and pending acquisitions and one acquisition that we have determined not to pursue further at this time.

 

Interest expense.  Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013, was $4,514, an increase of $1,876 compared to the same period in 2012.  The increase was primarily due to the issuance of our Senior Notes in January 2013 and consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

$

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest related to our Senior Notes and Credit Facility

 

$

2,731

 

$

535

 

$

2,196

 

HPT rent classified as interest

 

1,757

 

1,816

 

(59

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

171

 

89

 

82

 

Capitalized interest

 

(166

)

 

(166

)

Other

 

21

 

198

 

(177

)

Total interest expense

 

$

4,514

 

$

2,638

 

$

1,876

 

 

We capitalize a portion of the interest expense incurred on our Senior Notes that is attributable under GAAP to our more significant construction projects over the duration of the respective construction periods.  Capitalized interest is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the estimated useful life of the corresponding asset.

 

Income tax provision.  Our provision for income taxes was $1,074 and $429 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  We do not currently recognize the benefit of our deferred tax assets, including the tax benefit associated with our tax loss carry forwards from prior years, but our tax loss carry forwards do offset any federal and certain state income tax associated with our current taxable income.  Our income tax provision represents certain state taxes payable without regard to our tax loss carry forwards as well as the recognition of deferred tax liabilities that cannot be used to reduce existing deferred tax assets related to the tax amortization of indefinite lived intangible assets and to foreign currency translation adjustments.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to September 30, 2012

 

The following table presents changes in our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

$

 

%

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

$

4,927,971

 

$

5,039,010

 

$

(111,039

)

(2.2

)%

Nonfuel

 

1,100,554

 

1,020,299

 

80,255

 

7.9

%

Rent and royalties

 

9,676

 

11,220

 

(1,544

)

(13.8

)%

Total revenues

 

6,038,201

 

6,070,529

 

(32,328

)

(0.5

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel

 

4,669,885

 

4,789,447

 

(119,562

)

(2.5

)%

Nonfuel

 

496,140

 

455,201

 

40,939

 

9.0

%

Total cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation)

 

5,166,025

 

5,244,648

 

(78,623

)

(1.5

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site level operating expenses

 

570,007

 

525,962

 

44,045

 

8.4

%

Selling, general & administrative expense

 

71,414

 

73,110

 

(1,696

)

(2.3

)%

Real estate rent

 

156,412

 

148,030

 

8,382

 

5.7

%

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

41,894

 

37,138

 

4,756

 

12.8

%

Total operating expenses

 

839,727

 

784,240

 

55,487

 

7.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

32,449

 

41,641

 

(9,192

)

(22.1

)%

Income from equity investees

 

2,018

 

1,263

 

755

 

59.8

%

Acquisition costs

 

(1,346

)

(647

)

(699

)

108.0

%

Interest income

 

1,162

 

1,094

 

68

 

6.2

%

Interest expense

 

(13,009

)

(7,632

)

(5,377

)

70.5

%

Income before income taxes

 

21,274

 

35,719

 

(14,445

)

(40.4

)%

Provision for income taxes

 

1,626

 

1,062

 

564

 

53.1

%

Net income

 

$

19,648

 

$

34,657

 

$

(15,009

)

(43.3

)%

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Same Site Comparisons. As part of this discussion and analysis of our operating results we refer to increases and decreases in results on a same site basis.  For purposes of these comparisons, we include a location in the following same site comparisons only if we continuously operated it from January 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013, or, for rent and royalty revenues, if during that period the location was continuously operated by one of our franchisees.  We do not exclude locations from the same site comparisons as a result of expansions in their size, capital improvements to the site or changes in the services offered.  The table below excludes the data of two locations TA operates that are owned by a joint venture and one company operated site that was temporarily closed during parts of the period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

$

 

Favorable/

 

(gallons and dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

(Unfavorable)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of company operated locations

 

191

 

191

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fuel sales volume (gallons)

 

1,415,805

 

1,465,932

 

(50,127

)

(3.4

)%

Fuel revenues

 

$

4,542,954

 

$

4,764,085

 

$

(221,131

)

(4.6

)%

Fuel gross margin

 

$

243,222

 

$

245,689

 

$

(2,467

)

(1.0

)%

Fuel gross margin per gallon

 

$

0.172

 

$

0.168

 

$

0.004

 

2.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonfuel: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonfuel revenues

 

$

1,035,559

 

$

1,008,252

 

$

27,307

 

2.7

%

Nonfuel gross margin

 

$

568,619

 

$

558,617

 

$

10,002

 

1.8

%

Nonfuel gross margin percentage

 

54.9

%

55.4

%

 

 

(50

)pts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gross margin

 

$

811,841

 

$

804,306

 

$

7,535

 

0.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site level operating expenses (1) 

 

$

532,600

 

$

514,336

 

$

18,264

 

3.6

%

Site level operating expenses as a percentage of nonfuel revenues(1) 

 

51.4

%

51.0

%

 

 

(40

)pts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site level gross margin in excess of site level operating expenses(1)

 

$

279,241

 

$

289,970

 

$

(10,729

)

(3.7

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of franchisee operated locations

 

33

 

33

 

 

 

Rent and royalty revenues

 

$

9,561

 

$

8,416

 

$

1,145

 

13.6

%

 


(1)       Includes fuel volume, gross margin, revenues and expenses of locations that were company operated during the entirety of each of the periods presented.

 

Revenues.  Revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, were $6,038,201, which represented a decrease from the nine months ended September 30, 2012, of $32,328, or 0.5%, primarily resulting from a decrease in fuel revenue partially offset by an increase in nonfuel revenue.

 

Fuel revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were $4,927,971, a decrease of $111,039, or 2.2%, compared to the same period in 2012.  The table below shows the changes in fuel revenues between periods that resulted from price and volume changes:

 

24



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Gallons

 

Fuel

 

(gallons and dollars in thousands)

 

Sold

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results for nine months ended September 30, 2012

 

1,552,998

 

$

5,039,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease due to petroleum products price changes

 

 

(56,415

)

Decrease due to same site volume changes

 

(50,127

)

(161,513

)

Increase due to locations opened

 

78,238

 

250,253

 

Decrease in wholesale sales to nonfranchisees

 

(1,777

)

(5,823

)

Decrease in sales to franchisees on a wholesale basis

 

(42,561

)

(137,541

)

Net change from prior year period

 

(16,227

)

(111,039

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results for nine months ended September 30, 2013

 

1,536,771

 

$

4,927,971

 

 

The decrease in fuel revenue resulted largely from declines in same site sales volume, in fuel volume sold on a wholesale basis to franchisees and lower market prices for fuel, partially offset by sales volume growth at sites we acquired during 2012 and 2013.  On a same site basis, fuel sales volume for our company operated locations decreased by 50,127 gallons, or 3.4%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.  We believe that the effect of the new truck driver hours of services rules on miles driven and truck utilization, the trend of improved fuel efficiency of heavy truck engines and other fuel conservation efforts by trucking customers and our decision to avoid certain lower margin fuel sales contributed to decreased same site fuel sales volume despite the slight and slow improvement in the U.S. economy.  In addition, as noted above under “Overview,” competitive pressures from other industry participants also affected our fuel sales volume.  The decreased level of sales volume to franchisees resulted from the sublease renewals we entered into with our franchisees in the second half of 2012 that eliminated the requirement that these subtenants purchase their diesel fuel from us.

 

Nonfuel revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were $1,100,554, an increase of $80,255, or 7.9%, compared to the same period in 2012.  The majority of the change between periods resulted from an increase in revenues at those sites we acquired during 2012 and 2013, but also reflected a same site nonfuel revenue increase.  On a same site basis for our company operated sites, nonfuel revenues increased by $27,307, or 2.7%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.  We believe the same site nonfuel revenue increase reflects increased customer spending due to increased customer traffic, certain price increases we have instituted as a result of increased prices we paid for nonfuel inventory purchases and the effects of certain of our marketing initiatives.

 

Rent and royalty revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were $9,676, a decrease of $1,544, or 13.8%, compared to the same period in 2012.  Rent and royalties decreased largely as a result of our acquisitions during 2012 and 2013 of ten franchise locations that we now operate, including four that we had subleased to a franchisee.  This decrease was partially offset by increased rents at six sites we subleased to franchisees that became effective during the second half of 2012.  In October 2013, the sublease for one of these six sites was terminated and we began to operate that travel center.

 

Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation). Cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $5,166,025, a decrease of $78,623, or 1.5%, compared to the same period in 2012.

 

Fuel cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, of $4,669,885 decreased by $119,562, or 2.5%, compared to the same period in 2012.  This decrease in fuel cost of goods sold primarily resulted from the decrease in same site fuel sales volumes and the decrease in fuel sold to franchisees on a wholesale basis partially offset by sales volume growth due to sites we acquired during 2012 and 2013.  The fuel gross margin per gallon of $0.172 on a same site basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $0.004 per gallon higher than for the same period of 2012, primarily as a result of variations in market prices for fuel, competitive conditions within our industry and our decision to forgo certain low margin sales.  In addition, during the first nine months of 2013, we recognized $3,887 as a reduction of our fuel cost of goods sold as a result of refunds paid or due to us in relation to certain fuel purchases during 2012 as a result of the retroactive reinstatement of biodiesel tax credits.

 

Nonfuel cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $496,140, an increase of $40,939, or 9.0%, compared to the same period in 2012.  Nonfuel cost of goods sold increased primarily due to the nonfuel sales increases noted above, combined with increases in product unit costs.  Nonfuel gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $604,414, compared to $565,098 during the same period of 2012.  Nonfuel gross margin was 54.9% and 55.4% of nonfuel revenues during the first nine months of 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The nonfuel gross margin percentage decreased largely as a result of a change in the mix of products and services sold, as well as increases in our cost of tires that we were not able to pass on with corresponding higher sales prices charged to our customers.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

Site level operating expenses.  Site level operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were $570,007, an increase of $44,045, or 8.4%, compared to the same period in 2012.  The increase in site level operating expenses was primarily due to the locations we acquired during 2012 and 2013, including $1,215 of start up expenses at these sites.

 

On a same site basis for our company operated sites, site level operating expenses increased by $18,264, or 3.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to labor costs that increased as the level of nonfuel sales grew and increased utilities expenses and insurance costs, including property and general liability premiums and claims.  Site level operating expenses as a percentage of nonfuel revenues on a same site basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were 51.4%, compared to 51.0% for the same period in 2012.  The increase in operating expenses as a percentage of nonfuel revenues on a same site basis was a result of increases in our utility costs, costs related to self insurance reserves for general liability claims and certain taxes other than income taxes.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were $71,414, compared to $73,110 during the same period of 2012, a decrease of $1,696, or 2.3%.  The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily the result of decreased litigation expenses, partially offset by increased personnel costs.

 

Real estate rent expense.  Rent expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $156,412, an increase of $8,382 compared to the same period in 2012 that is attributable to rent increases related to improvements acquired by HPT since January 1, 2012, and percentage rent recognized under the HPT Leases based on increases in 2013 fuel and nonfuel revenues over base amounts.

 

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $41,894, an increase of $4,756, or 12.8%, compared to the same period in 2012, that primarily resulted from the location acquisitions and other capital investments we completed (and did not subsequently sell to HPT) during 2012 and 2013.

 

Acquisition costs.  Acquisition costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were $1,346, an increase of $699, or 108.0%, compared to the same period in 2012, that primarily resulted from costs incurred for the legal and due diligence activities associated with our consideration of possible acquisitions, including closed and pending acquisitions and one acquisition that we have determined not to pursue further at this time.

 

Interest expense.  Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $13,009, an increase of $5,377 compared to the same period in 2012.  The increase was primarily due to the issuance of our Senior Notes in January 2013 and consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

$

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest related to our Senior Notes and Credit Facility

 

$

7,845

 

$

1,605

 

$

6,240

 

HPT rent classified as interest

 

5,242

 

5,436

 

(194

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

496

 

263

 

233

 

Capitalized interest

 

(806

)

 

(806

)

Other