UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
o |
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-51446
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
02-0636095 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
121 South 17th Street |
|
|
Mattoon, Illinois |
|
61938-3987 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(217) 235-3311
(Registrants Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each class of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date
Class |
|
Outstanding as of August 3, 2012 |
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value |
|
39,917,265 Shares |
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
| ||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
93,005 |
|
$ |
92,623 |
|
$ |
186,369 |
|
$ |
188,064 |
|
Operating expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
|
36,526 |
|
34,267 |
|
72,390 |
|
69,951 |
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
19,996 |
|
19,147 |
|
39,524 |
|
39,846 |
| ||||
Financing and other transactions |
|
562 |
|
2,540 |
|
5,384 |
|
2,540 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
21,869 |
|
21,987 |
|
44,006 |
|
44,145 |
| ||||
Operating income |
|
14,052 |
|
14,682 |
|
25,065 |
|
31,582 |
| ||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
(16,893 |
) |
(12,397 |
) |
(31,493 |
) |
(24,336 |
) | ||||
Investment income |
|
6,762 |
|
6,097 |
|
13,228 |
|
13,014 |
| ||||
Other, net |
|
185 |
|
210 |
|
199 |
|
437 |
| ||||
Income before income taxes |
|
4,106 |
|
8,592 |
|
6,999 |
|
20,697 |
| ||||
Income tax expense |
|
1,200 |
|
3,079 |
|
2,209 |
|
7,687 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
2,906 |
|
5,513 |
|
4,790 |
|
13,010 |
| ||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
120 |
|
162 |
|
245 |
|
294 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
2,786 |
|
$ |
5,351 |
|
$ |
4,545 |
|
$ |
12,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,906 |
|
$ |
5,513 |
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
Change in prior service cost and net of loss, net of tax of $273 and ($207) for three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and $543 and $80 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 |
|
448 |
|
(357 |
) |
897 |
|
135 |
| ||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax of $339 and $352 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and $924 and $2,056 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 |
|
581 |
|
602 |
|
1,584 |
|
3,558 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
3,935 |
|
5,758 |
|
7,271 |
|
16,703 |
| ||||
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
120 |
|
162 |
|
245 |
|
294 |
| ||||
Total comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
3,815 |
|
$ |
5,596 |
|
$ |
7,026 |
|
$ |
16,409 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
84,984 |
|
$ |
105,704 |
|
Restricted cash see footnote 4 |
|
315,082 |
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,743 in 2012 and $2,547 in 2011 |
|
35,165 |
|
35,492 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
7,233 |
|
7,151 |
| ||
Income tax receivable |
|
11,276 |
|
8,988 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
4,825 |
|
4,825 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
7,769 |
|
6,170 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
466,334 |
|
168,330 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
321,047 |
|
332,046 |
| ||
Investments |
|
99,423 |
|
98,069 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
520,562 |
|
520,562 |
| ||
Customer lists, net |
|
46,742 |
|
57,811 |
| ||
Tradenames |
|
12,347 |
|
12,347 |
| ||
Deferred debt issuance costs, net and other assets |
|
12,981 |
|
4,904 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,479,436 |
|
$ |
1,194,069 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
15,128 |
|
$ |
13,673 |
|
Advance billings and customer deposits |
|
20,974 |
|
20,324 |
| ||
Dividends payable |
|
11,603 |
|
11,571 |
| ||
Accrued expense |
|
34,640 |
|
24,571 |
| ||
Current portion of senior secured term debt |
|
8,800 |
|
8,800 |
| ||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
216 |
|
192 |
| ||
Current portion of derivative liability |
|
8,340 |
|
3,580 |
| ||
Current portion of pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
2,579 |
|
2,579 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
102,280 |
|
85,290 |
| ||
Long-term portion of capital lease obligation |
|
4,403 |
|
4,519 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
1,164,855 |
|
871,200 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
78,794 |
|
77,327 |
| ||
Pension and other postretirement obligations |
|
89,587 |
|
93,754 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
6,863 |
|
14,167 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
1,446,782 |
|
1,146,257 |
| ||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 29,951,282 and 29,869,512, shares outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
|
299 |
|
299 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
61,968 |
|
79,852 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net |
|
(35,352 |
) |
(37,833 |
) | ||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
5,739 |
|
5,494 |
| ||
Total stockholders equity |
|
32,654 |
|
47,812 |
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,479,436 |
|
$ |
1,194,069 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Other |
|
Non-controlling |
|
|
| ||||||||
(In thousands, except share amounts) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss, net |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Balance - December 31, 2011 |
|
29,869,512 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
79,852 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(37,833 |
) |
$ |
5,494 |
|
$ |
47,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(9,843 |
) |
(1,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11,602 |
) | ||||||
Shares issued under employee plan, net of forfeitures |
|
81,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
| ||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
1,452 |
|
125 |
|
3,336 |
| ||||||
Balance - March 31, 2012 |
|
29,951,282 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
70,510 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(36,381 |
) |
$ |
5,619 |
|
$ |
40,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,817 |
) |
(2,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11,603 |
) | ||||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314 |
) | ||||||
Non-cash, stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
| ||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
1,029 |
|
120 |
|
3,935 |
| ||||||
Balance June 30, 2012 |
|
29,951,282 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
$ |
61,968 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(35,352 |
) |
$ |
5,739 |
|
$ |
32,654 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
44,006 |
|
44,145 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
298 |
| ||
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
206 |
|
4 |
| ||
Cash distributions from wireless partnerships in excess of (less than) earnings |
|
(1,171 |
) |
(300 |
) | ||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
1,090 |
|
1,090 |
| ||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
5,020 |
|
662 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
327 |
|
4,954 |
| ||
Income tax receivable |
|
(2,288 |
) |
2,564 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
(82 |
) |
(285 |
) | ||
Other assets |
|
(1,599 |
) |
(982 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
1,455 |
|
827 |
| ||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
(275 |
) |
(4,784 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
51,479 |
|
61,203 |
| ||
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(22,151 |
) |
(20,704 |
) | ||
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
|
28 |
|
396 |
| ||
Restricted cash for acquisition of SureWest |
|
(298,035 |
) |
|
| ||
Other |
|
(314 |
) |
56 |
| ||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(320,472 |
) |
(20,252 |
) | ||
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds on bond offering |
|
298,055 |
|
|
| ||
Restricted cash on bond offering |
|
(17,047 |
) |
|
| ||
Payment of capital lease obligation |
|
(92 |
) |
(71 |
) | ||
Payment on long term debt |
|
(4,400 |
) |
|
| ||
Payment of financing costs |
|
(5,070 |
) |
(3,399 |
) | ||
Dividends on common stock |
|
(23,173 |
) |
(23,128 |
) | ||
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
248,273 |
|
(26,598 |
) | ||
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
(20,720 |
) |
14,353 |
| ||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
|
105,704 |
|
67,654 |
| ||
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
84,984 |
|
$ |
82,007 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Nature of Operations
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to as Consolidated, the Company, we, our or us, unless the context otherwise requires. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We have prepared the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herewith reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for an entire year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
As of June 30, 2012, the Companys Summary of Critical Accounting Policies for the year ended December 31, 2011, which are detailed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, have not changed.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the day the financial statements are issued.
Reclassifications
Certain prior-quarter amounts have been reclassified in the statement of cash flows from financing activities to operating activities. These reclassifications had no impact on net cash flows.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2012, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (ASU 2011-04), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This pronouncement was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances
the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2012, we adopted the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-05), Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 requires an entity to either present components of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. Accordingly, we have presented net income and other comprehensive income in two consecutive statements.
3. Agreement and Plan of Merger with SureWest Communications
On February 5, 2012, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all the outstanding shares of SureWest Communications (SureWest) for $23.00 per share in a cash and stock transaction. SureWest provides a wide range of telecommunications, digital video, Internet, data and other facilities-based communications services in Northern California, primarily in the greater Sacramento region, and in the greater Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri areas.
The merger agreement provided that each record holder of SureWest common stock could make one of the following elections, or a combination of the two, at or prior to the election deadline provided for in the merger agreement, regarding the type of merger consideration they wish to receive in exchange for shares of SureWest common stock:
· a cash election to receive $23.00 in cash, without interest, for each share of SureWest common stock, or
· a stock election to receive shares of our common stock having an equivalent value based on average trading prices for the 20-day period ending two days before the closing date of the merger, subject to a collar so that there would be a maximum exchange ratio of 1.40565 shares of our common stock for each share of SureWest common stock and a minimum of 1.03896 shares of our common stock for each share of SureWest common stock.
Overall elections were subject to a proration so that approximately 50% of the SureWest shares (treating equity award shares as outstanding shares) would be exchanged for cash and approximately 50% for our stock.
The California PUC approved the merger on June 7, 2012. On June 12, 2012, SureWest shareholders and Consolidateds stockholders approved the issuance of our common stock to SureWest shareholders. Final closing on the SureWest transaction occurred July 2, 2012. The price in the acquisition, excluding debt assumed, consisted of cash of $176.7 million and 9,965,983 shares of the Companys common stock (based on average trading prices for the Companys common stock over the 20-day period ending two days before the closing date of the merger), totaled $320.7 million.
The cash portion of the merger consideration and the funds required to repay SureWest outstanding debt was financed with $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 10.875% Senior Notes due 2020 (Senior Notes). We also used cash on hand and approximately $35.0 million in borrowings from our revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition.
The acquisition of SureWest will be recorded in accordance with the acquisition method, and it is expected that goodwill and intangible assets will be recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. However, as the initial accounting for the business combination has not been completed as of August 6, 2012, including the measurement of certain intangible assets and goodwill.
4. Restricted cash
At June 30, 2012, the Company had restricted cash of $315.1 million on deposit with an Escrow Agent in connection with the acquisition of SureWest. The restricted cash included $298.0 million of net proceeds from the issuance of Senior Notes for the SureWest acquisition and $17.1 million of cash escrowed to ensure coverage of a redemption fee and interest accruing on the financing through November 5, 2012 for the repayment of the financing in the event the SureWest acquisition were not consummated by that date. There was no such restricted cash at December 31, 2011.
5. Prepaid expense and other current assets
Prepaid and other current assets are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Prepaid maintenance |
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
$ |
1,980 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
1,784 |
|
440 |
| ||
Deferred charges |
|
672 |
|
784 |
| ||
Prepaid insurance |
|
470 |
|
313 |
| ||
Prepaid expense - other |
|
2,438 |
|
2,607 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
45 |
|
46 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
7,769 |
|
$ |
6,170 |
|
6. Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
65,282 |
|
$ |
66,704 |
|
Network and outside plant facilities |
|
904,711 |
|
897,140 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
50,516 |
|
73,185 |
| ||
Assets under capital lease |
|
10,014 |
|
10,014 |
| ||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(722,696 |
) |
(721,527 |
) | ||
|
|
307,827 |
|
325,516 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
13,220 |
|
6,530 |
| ||
Totals |
|
$ |
321,047 |
|
$ |
332,046 |
|
Depreciation expense totaled $16.3 million and $16.5 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and $32.9 million and $33.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
7. Investments
We own 2.34% of GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (the Mobilnet South Partnership). The principal activity of the Mobilnet South Partnership is providing cellular service in the Houston, Galveston, and Beaumont, Texas metropolitan areas. We also own 3.60% of Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (Pittsburgh SMSA), which provides cellular service in and around the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Because of our limited influence over these partnerships, we use the cost method to account for both of these investments. It is not practicable to estimate fair value of these investments. We did not evaluate any of the investments for impairment as no factors indicating
impairment existed during the year. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $3.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $5.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
We also own 17.02% of GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (RSA #17), 16.6725% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (RSA 6(I)), and 23.67% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (RSA 6(II)). RSA #17 provides cellular service to a limited rural area in Texas. RSA 6(I) and RSA 6(II) provide cellular service in and around our Pennsylvania service territory. Because we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these three entities, we account for the investments using the equity method. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $2.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $6.5 million and $7.7 million, respectively.
Our investments are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies |
|
$ |
2,037 |
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
Cost method investments: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (2.34% interest) |
|
21,450 |
|
21,450 |
| ||
Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (3.60% interest) |
|
22,950 |
|
22,950 |
| ||
CoBank, ACB Stock |
|
3,518 |
|
3,394 |
| ||
Other |
|
15 |
|
15 |
| ||
Equity method investments: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (17.02% interest) |
|
19,226 |
|
19,422 |
| ||
Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (16.6725% interest) |
|
7,300 |
|
7,063 |
| ||
Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (23.67% interest) |
|
22,927 |
|
21,797 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
99,423 |
|
$ |
98,069 |
|
CoBank is a cooperative bank owned by its customers. Annually, CoBank distributes patronage in the form of cash and stock in the cooperative based on the Companys outstanding loan balance with CoBank, which has traditionally been a significant lender in the Companys credit facility. The investment in CoBank represents the accumulation of the equity patronage paid by CoBank to the Company.
Because the income from our equity method investments exceeded 10% of our pretax income for the first six months of 2012, below is a summary of unaudited summarized income statement and balance sheet information for the three equity investments:
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
73,555 |
|
$ |
74,485 |
|
$ |
145,890 |
|
$ |
143,548 |
|
Income from operations |
|
22,235 |
|
20,631 |
|
41,927 |
|
40,796 |
| ||||
Net income before taxes |
|
22,247 |
|
20,656 |
|
41,956 |
|
40,848 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
22,143 |
|
20,556 |
|
41,748 |
|
40,648 |
| ||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets |
|
$ |
51,801 |
|
$ |
44,739 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
76,771 |
|
79,432 |
| ||
Current liabilities |
|
12,163 |
|
14,523 |
| ||
Non-current liabilities |
|
1,210 |
|
1,096 |
| ||
Partnership equity |
|
115,199 |
|
108,552 |
| ||
8. Fair Value Measurements
The Companys derivative instruments related to interest rate swap agreements are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are determined using an internal valuation model which relies on the expected LIBOR based yield curve and estimates of counterparty and Consolidateds non-performance risk as the most significant inputs. Because each of these inputs are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, we have categorized these interest rate swaps as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
The Companys interest rate swap assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to disclosure requirements at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current interest rate swap liabilities |
|
$ |
(8,340 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(8,340 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Long-term interest rate swap liabilities |
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
|
(5,103 |
) |
|
| ||||
Totals |
|
$ |
(13,443 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(13,443 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Current interest rate swap liabilities |
|
$ |
(3,580 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(3,580 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Long-term interest rate swap liabilities |
|
(12,401 |
) |
|
|
(12,401 |
) |
|
| ||||
Totals |
|
$ |
(15,981 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(15,981 |
) |
$ |
|
|
The change in the fair value of the derivatives is primarily a result of a change in market expectations for future interest rates.
We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities. The carrying value of other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities or variable-rate nature of the respective balances. The following table presents the other financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
|
|
As of June 30, 2012 |
|
As of December 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
Investments, equity basis |
|
$ |
49,453 |
|
n/a |
|
$ |
48,282 |
|
n/a |
| ||
Investments, at cost |
|
$ |
47,933 |
|
n/a |
|
$ |
47,809 |
|
n/a |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,173,655 |
|
$ |
1,173,655 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
The Companys investments at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 accounted for under both the equity and cost methods consist of minority positions in various cellular telephone limited partnerships. These investments are recorded using either the equity or cost methods.
Our senior secured long-term debt of $875.6 million allows us to select a one month LIBOR repricing option, which we have elected. As such, the fair value of this debt approximates its carrying value. Based upon the inputs of the LIBOR based yield curve, which can be corroborated by observable market data, we have categorized the long-term debt as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Our Senior Notes long term debt of $298.1 million earns interest at a rate of 10.875% per year. The fair value of this debt approximates its carrying value. We have categorized the Senior Notes long-term debt as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are not amortized but are subject to impairment testingno less than annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment.
The following table presents the carrying amount of goodwill by segment:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Telephone Operations |
|
$ |
519,542 |
|
$ |
519,542 |
|
Other Operations |
|
1,020 |
|
1,020 |
| ||
Totals |
|
$ |
520,562 |
|
$ |
520,562 |
|
Our most valuable tradename is the federally registered mark CONSOLIDATED, which is used in association with our telephone communication services and is a design of interlocking circles. The Companys corporate branding strategy leverages a CONSOLIDATED naming structure. All of the Companys business units and several of our products and services incorporate the CONSOLIDATED name. These tradenames are indefinitely renewable intangibles. The carrying value of the tradenames was $12.3 million at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
The Companys customer lists consist of an established base of customers that subscribe to its services. The carrying amount of customer lists is as follows:
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
Other Operations |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
193,124 |
|
$ |
193,124 |
|
$ |
4,405 |
|
$ |
4,405 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
(146,602 |
) |
(135,754 |
) |
(4,185 |
) |
(3,964 |
) | ||||
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
46,522 |
|
$ |
57,370 |
|
$ |
220 |
|
$ |
441 |
|
Amortization associated with customer lists totaled approximately $5.6 million and $11.1 million in each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
10. Deferred Debt Issuance Costs, Net and Other Assets
Deferred financing costs, net and other assets are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred debt issuance costs, net |
|
$ |
12,927 |
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
Other assets |
|
54 |
|
71 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
12,981 |
|
$ |
4,904 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs are subject to amortization. Deferred debt issuance costs of $5.1 million at June 30, 2012 related to our secured credit facility will be amortized over the term of the corresponding debt. The remaining $7.8 million deferred costs relate to the acquisition of SureWest which include $6.8 million of an underwriting commission and $1.0 million for issuance of Senior Notes. The deferred cost associated with the acquisition of SureWest will be amortized over the term of the maturity of the Senior Notes through June 2020.
11. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accrued salaries |
|
$ |
4,258 |
|
$ |
5,851 |
|
Accrued employee benefits |
|
4,341 |
|
4,384 |
| ||
Accrued financing fees |
|
10,910 |
|
|
| ||
Taxes payable |
|
2,754 |
|
4,599 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
3,034 |
|
237 |
| ||
Accrued site commissions |
|
2,452 |
|
3,559 |
| ||
Other accrued expenses |
|
6,891 |
|
5,941 |
| ||
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
34,640 |
|
$ |
24,571 |
|
12. Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Senior secured credit facility term loan |
|
$ |
875,600 |
|
$ |
880,000 |
|
Senior notes net of discount |
|
298,055 |
|
|
| ||
Senior secured credit facility revolving loan |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
1,173,655 |
|
880,000 |
| ||
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
(8,800 |
) |
(8,800 |
) | ||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,164,855 |
|
$ |
871,200 |
|
Credit Agreement
The Company, through certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, has an outstanding credit agreement with several financial institutions, which consists of a $50 million revolving credit facility, $875.6 million term loan facility, and $300.0 million of Senior Notes. On July 2, 2012, we used $35 million on the revolving credit facility in connection with the SureWest acquisition. Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company with the exception of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company. The Senior Notes are unsecured.
Our term loan credit facility is made up of two separate tranches, resulting in different maturity dates and interest rate margins for each term loan tranche. The first term loan tranche consists of $468.6 million aggregate principal amount, matures on December 31, 2014 and has an applicable margin (at our election) equal to either 2.50% for a LIBOR-based term loan or 1.50% for an alternative base rate loan. The second term loan tranche consists of $407.0 million aggregate principal amount, matures on December 31, 2017 and has an applicable margin (at our election) equal to either 3.75% for a LIBOR-based term loan or 2.75% for an alternative base rate term loan. The applicable margins for each of the term loan tranches are fixed for the duration of the loans. The amended term loan facility also requires $2.2 million in quarterly principal payments which began on March 31, 2012.
Our revolving credit facility has a maturity date of June 8, 2016 and an applicable margin (at our election) of between 2.75% and 3.50% for LIBOR-based borrowings and between 1.75% and 2.50% for alternative base rate borrowings, depending on our leverage ratio. Based on our leverage ratio of 4.61:1.00 at June 30, 2012, the borrowing margin for the next three month period ending September 30, 2012 will be at a weighted-average margin of 3.25% for a LIBOR-based loan or 2.25% for an alternative base rate loan. The applicable borrowing margin for the revolving credit facility is adjusted quarterly to reflect the leverage ratio from the prior quarter-end. There were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011, or at any time during the quarter ended June 30, 2012. On July 2, 2012, we borrowed $35.0 million of the revolving credit facility for the acquisition of SureWest.
The weighted-average interest rate incurred on our credit facilities during the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, including amounts paid on our interest rate swap agreements and the applicable margin, was 4.90% and 5.45% per annum, respectively. Interest is payable at least quarterly.
The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants, including, among other items, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, issue capital stock, and commit to future capital expenditures. We have agreed to maintain certain financial ratios, including interest coverage, and total net leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement. As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with the credit agreement covenants.
In connection with the acquisition of SureWest described in Note 3, on February 5, 2012 the Company received committed financing for a total of $350.0 million to fund the cash portion of the anticipated transaction, to refinance SureWests debt and to pay for certain transaction costs. The financing package included a $350.0 million Senior Unsecured Bridge Loan Facility (Bridge Facility). As anticipated, permanent financing for the SureWest acquisition was funded by our Senior Note offering, as described below. As a result, the $4.1 million commitment fee incurred for the Bridge Facility was capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs and was amortized over the expected life of the Bridge Facility, which was four months.
Effective February 17, 2012, we amended our credit facility to provide us with the ability to escrow proceeds from a high-yield note offering prior to closing the SureWest acquisition and, until closing, exclude the debt from current leverage calculations. The amendment also permitted us additional flexibility for future high yield notes issuances with the same subsidiary guarantees required by our current credit facility, which enabled us to issue the Senior Notes described below. All other terms, coverage and leverage ratios of the credit facility were unchanged. Fees totaling $3.5 million were recognized as expense in connection with the amendment while $1.2 million in fees were capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs and amortized over the remaining life of the term debt.
On May 30, 2012, we completed an offering of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.875% Senior Notes, due 2020 through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Consolidated Communications Finance Co. (Finance Co.) for the acquisition of SureWest. The Senior Notes will mature on June 1, 2020 and earn interest at a rate of 10.875% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on December 1, 2012. The Senior Notes were sold to investors at a price equal to 99.345% of the principal amount thereof, for a yield to maturity of 11.00%. This discount will be amortized over the term of the Senior Notes. The proceeds of the sale of the Senior Notes were held in an escrow account pending closing of the SureWest transaction. Upon closing of the SureWest acquisition on July 2, 2012, Finance Co. merged with and into our wholly-owned subsidiary Consolidated Communications, Inc., which assumed the Senior Notes, and we and certain of our subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guaranteed the Senior Notes.
13. Derivatives
In order to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future cash interest payments. We account for these transactions as cash flow hedges under the FASBs ASC Topic 815 (ASC 815), Derivatives and Hedging. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of our expected future interest payments. In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the hedging derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the hedged item affects earnings. The change in fair value of any ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.
The following interest rate swaps, all designated as cash flow hedges, were outstanding at June 30, 2012:
(In thousands) |
|
Notional |
|
2012 Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair |
| ||
Fixed to 3-month floating LIBOR |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
(1,842 |
) |
Fixed to 3-month floating LIBOR |
|
130,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
(3,880 |
) | ||
3-month floating LIBOR minus spread to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
100,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
(89 |
) | ||
3-month floating LIBOR minus spread to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
130,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
(168 |
) | ||
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
200,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(3,337 |
) | ||
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
200,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
(2,361 |
) | ||
Forward starting fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
175,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(1,766 |
) | ||
Total Fair Values |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13,443 |
) | |
The following interest rate swaps, all designated as cash flow hedges, were outstanding at December 31, 2011:
(In thousands) |
|
Notional |
|
2011 Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fixed to 3-month floating LIBOR |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
(3,401 |
) |
Fixed to 3-month floating LIBOR |
|
130,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(6,053 |
) | ||
3-month floating LIBOR minus spread to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
100,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
(179 |
) | ||
3-month floating LIBOR minus spread to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
130,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(269 |
) | ||
Fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
300,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(5,343 |
) | ||
Forward starting fixed to 1-month floating LIBOR |
|
200,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(736 |
) | ||
Total Fair Values |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(15,981 |
) | |
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the interest rate on approximately 72% and 60%, respectively, of our outstanding debt (excluding the Senior Notes) was fixed through the use of interest rate swaps.
The counterparties to our various swaps are 5 major U.S. and European banks. None of the swap agreements provide for either us or the counterparties to post collateral nor do the agreements include any covenants related to the financial condition of Consolidated or the counterparties. The swaps of any counterparty that is a Lender as defined in our credit facility are secured along with the other creditors under the credit facility. Each of the swap agreements provides that in the event of a bankruptcy filing by either Consolidated or the counterparty, any amounts owed between the two
parties would be offset in order to determine the net amount due between parties. This provision allows us to partially mitigate the risk of non-performance by a counterparty.
At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the pretax deferred losses related to our interest rate swap agreements included in other comprehensive income totaled $13.4 million and $15.9 million, respectively. The change in fair value of any ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.
Information regarding our cash flow hedge transactions is as follows:
|
|
For the three months |
|
For the six months |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss/(gain) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) |
|
$ |
(581 |
) |
$ |
(953 |
) |
$ |
(1,584 |
) |
$ |
(5,614 |
) |
Loss/(gain) arising from ineffectiveness increasing/(reducing) interest expense |
|
(15 |
) |
(24 |
) |
(31 |
) |
(59 |
) | ||||
Deferred losses/(gains) reclassed from AOCI to interest expense |
|
(14 |
) |
402 |
|
(1 |
) |
885 |
| ||||
(In thousands, except months) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Aggregate notional value of current derivatives outstanding |
|
$ |
630,000 |
|
$ |
530,000 |
|
Aggregate notional value of forward derivatives outstanding |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Period through which derivative positions currently exist |
|
March 2016 |
|
June 2015 |
| ||
Fair value of derivatives |
|
$ |
13,443 |
|
$ |
15,981 |
|
Deferred losses included in AOCI (pretax) |
|
$ |
13,425 |
|
$ |
15,932 |
|
Losses included in AOCI to be recognized in the next 12 months |
|
$ |
41 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
Number of months over which loss in OCI is to be recognized |
|
9 |
|
15 |
|
14. Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income
The following table summarizes interest expense for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense credit facility |
|
$ |
7,377 |
|
$ |
6,382 |
|
$ |
14,837 |
|
$ |
12,468 |
|
Payments on swap liabilities, net |
|
3,502 |
|
5,388 |
|
6,963 |
|
10,645 |
| ||||
Interest expense capital leases |
|
160 |
|
165 |
|
321 |
|
321 |
| ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs bridge facility |
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
4,160 |
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense bridge facility |
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense Senior Notes |
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
| ||||
Uncertain tax position interest accrual |
|
10 |
|
12 |
|
19 |
|
24 |
| ||||
Other interest |
|
162 |
|
188 |
|
291 |
|
362 |
| ||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
460 |
|
338 |
|
860 |
|
662 |
| ||||
Capitalized interest |
|
(42 |
) |
(39 |
) |
(82 |
) |
(72 |
) | ||||
Total interest expense |
|
16,935 |
|
12,434 |
|
31,577 |
|
24,410 |
| ||||
Less: interest income |
|
(42 |
) |
(37 |
) |
(84 |
) |
(74 |
) | ||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
$ |
16,893 |
|
$ |
12,397 |
|
$ |
31,493 |
|
$ |
24,336 |
|
15. Retirement and Pension Plans
We have 401(k) plans covering substantially all of our employees. Contributions made under our defined contribution plans include a match, at the Companys discretion, of employee salaries contributed to the plans. We recognized expense with respect to these plans of $0.6 million for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $1.3 million for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Qualified Retirement Plan
We sponsor a defined-benefit pension plan (Retirement Plan) that is non-contributory covering substantially all of our hourly employees who fulfill minimum age and service requirements. Certain salaried employees are also covered by the Retirement Plan, although these benefits have previously been frozen.
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the qualified retirement plan for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
357 |
|
$ |
222 |
|
$ |
713 |
|
$ |
638 |
|
Interest cost |
|
2,627 |
|
2,902 |
|
5,255 |
|
5,451 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(2,611 |
) |
(2,952 |
) |
(5,222 |
) |
(5,446 |
) | ||||
Net amortization loss (gain) |
|
798 |
|
(495 |
) |
1,596 |
|
375 |
| ||||
Prior service credit amortization |
|
(41 |
) |
(32 |
) |
(83 |
) |
(83 |
) | ||||
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
$ |
(355 |
) |
$ |
2,259 |
|
$ |
935 |
|
Non-qualified Pension Plan
The Company also has non-qualified supplemental pension plans (Restoration Plans), which we acquired as part of our North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (North Pittsburgh) and TXU Communications Venture Company (TXUCV) acquisitions. The Restoration Plans cover certain former employees of our Pennsylvania and Texas operations. The Restoration Plans restores benefits that were precluded under the Retirement Plan by Internal Revenue Service limits on compensation and benefits applicable to qualified pension plans, and by the exclusion of bonus compensation from the Retirement Plans definition of earnings.
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the Restoration Plans for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest cost |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
Net amortization loss |
|
11 |
|
5 |
|
22 |
|
17 |
| ||||
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
Other Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Agreements
We also are liable for deferred compensation agreements with former members of the board of directors and certain other former employees of a subsidiary of TXUCV, which was acquired in 2004. The benefits are payable for up to the life of the participant and may begin as early as age 65 or upon the death of the participant. Participants accrue no new benefits as these plans had previously been frozen by TXUCVs predecessor company prior to our acquisition of TXUCV. Payments related to the deferred compensation agreements totaled approximately $0.1 million for both the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $0.3 million for both six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The net present value of the remaining obligations was approximately $2.3 million at June 30, 2012 and $2.5 million at December 31, 2011, and is included in pension and postretirement benefit obligations in the accompanying balance sheets.
We also maintain 38 life insurance policies on certain of the participating former directors and employees. We recognized $0.2 million in life insurance proceeds as other non-operating income in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012. We did not recognize any proceeds in other income for the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2011 due to the receipt of life insurance proceeds. The excess of the cash surrender value of the remaining life insurance policies over the notes payable balances related to these policies is determined by an independent consultant, and totaled $2.0 million at June 30, 2012 and $2.0 million at December 31, 2011. These amounts are included in investments in the accompanying balance sheets. Cash principal payments for the policies and any proceeds from the policies are classified as operating activities in the statements of cash flows.
16. Postretirement Benefit Obligation
We sponsor a healthcare plan and life insurance plan that provides postretirement medical benefits and life insurance to certain groups of retired employees. Retirees share in the cost of healthcare benefits, making contributions that are adjusted periodicallyeither based upon collective bargaining agreements or because total costs of the program have changed. We generally pay the covered expenses for retiree health benefits as they are incurred. Postretirement life insurance benefits are fully insured.
The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic costs for postretirement benefits for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the three months |
|
For the six months |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
213 |
|
$ |
223 |
|
$ |
427 |
|
$ |
446 |
|
Interest cost |
|
414 |
|
398 |
|
828 |
|
796 |
| ||||
Net prior service cost amortization |
|
(47 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(95 |
) |
(94 |
) | ||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
580 |
|
$ |
574 |
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
$ |
1,148 |
|
17. Other Long-term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities are as follows:
(In thousands) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
5,103 |
|
$ |
12,401 |
|
Uncertain tax positions |
|
1,224 |
|
1,224 |
| ||
Accrued interest on uncertain tax positions |
|
70 |
|
50 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
466 |
|
492 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
6,863 |
|
$ |
14,167 |
|
18. Stock-based Compensation Plans
Pretax stock-based compensation expense for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
For the three months |
|
For the six months |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restricted stock |
|
$ |
325 |
|
$ |
342 |
|
$ |
650 |
|
$ |
691 |
|
Performance shares |
|
264 |
|
237 |
|
440 |
|
399 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
589 |
|
$ |
579 |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.
As of June 30, 2012, we had not yet recognized compensation expense on the following non-vested awards.
(In thousands) |
|
Non-recognized |
|
Average Remaining |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Restricted stock |
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
1.2 |
|
Performance shares |
|
1,510 |
|
1.2 |
| |
Total |
|
$ |
3,362 |
|
1.2 |
|
The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock awards outstanding and changes during the six months ended June 30:
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||||
|
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
| ||
Non-vested restricted shares outstanding January 1 |
|
129,203 |
|
$ |
17.79 |
|
101,435 |
|
$ |
17.40 |
|
Shares granted |
|
14,732 |
|
19.30 |
|
127,377 |
|
17.92 |
| ||
Shares cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
(10,282 |
) |
18.48 |
| ||
Shares vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-vested restricted shares outstanding June 30 |
|
143,935 |
|
$ |
17.94 |
|
218,530 |
|
$ |
17.65 |
|
(1) Represents the weightedaverage fair value on date of grant.
The following table summarizes unvested performance share-based restricted stock awards outstanding and changes during the six months ended June 30:
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||||
|
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
|
# of |
|
Price(1) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-vested performance shares outstanding January 1 |
|
50,879 |
|
$ |
17.04 |
|
68,880 |
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
Shares granted |
|
67,040 |
|
17.92 |
|
50,440 |
|
17.92 |
| ||
Shares canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
(10,768 |
) |
16.95 |
| ||
Non-vested performance shares outstanding June 30 |
|
117,919 |
|
$ |
17.54 |
|
108,552 |
|
$ |
16.63 |
|
(1) Represents the weightedaverage fair value on date of grant.
19. Income Taxes
There have been no changes to the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2011. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $1.2 million. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $0.8 million. We do not expect any changes in our unrecognized tax benefits during the remainder of 2012.
Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively. At June 30, 2012, we had no material liability for interest or penalties and had no material interest or penalty expense.
The only periods subject to examination for our federal return are years 2008 through 2010. The periods subject to examination for our state returns are years 2005 through 2010. We are not currently under examination by federal taxing authorities. We are currently under examination by state taxing authorities. We do not expect any settlement or payment that may result from the audit to have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows.
Our effective tax rate was 29.2% and 35.8% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and 31.6% and 37.1% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective tax rates differ from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to lower forecasted income due to the acquisition of SureWest, state income taxes owed in certain states where we are required to file on a separate legal entity basis, non-deductible expenses and a change in the Illinois state income tax rate.
20. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net is comprised of the following components:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fair value of cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
(13,425 |
) |
$ |
(15,932 |
) |
Prior service credits and net losses on postretirement plans |
|
(42,661 |
) |
(44,102 |
) | ||
|
|
(56,086 |
) |
(60,034 |
) | ||
Deferred taxes |
|
20,734 |
|
22,201 |
| ||
Totals |
|
$ |
(35,352 |
) |
$ |
(37,833 |
) |
21. Environmental Remediation Liabilities
Environmental remediation liabilities were $0.2 million at June 30, 2012 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2011, and are included in other long-term liabilities. These liabilities relate to anticipated remediation and monitoring costs with respect to two small vacant sites and are undiscounted. The Company believes the amount accrued is adequate to cover the remaining anticipated costs of remediation.
22. Capital Leases
The Company has four capital leases, all of which expire in 2021, for the lease of office, warehouse and tech center space. As of June 30, 2012, the present value of the minimum remaining lease commitments was approximately $4.6 million, of which $0.2 million is due and payable within the next 12 months. The leases will require total remaining rental payments to LATEL, a related party entity, of approximately $6.8 million and total remaining rental payments to Spruce of approximately $1.4 million over the term of the leases. These leases have total payments of $8.2 million on the remaining terms of the leases.
23. Litigation and Contingencies
Six putative class action lawsuits were filed by alleged SureWest shareholders challenging the Companys merger with SureWest in which the Company, WH Acquisition Corp. and WH Acquisition II Corp, SureWest and members of the SureWest board of directors have been named as defendants. Five shareholder actions were filed in the Superior Court of California, Placer County, and one shareholder action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The actions are called Needles v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed February 17, 2012, Errecart v. Oldham, et al., filed February 24, 2012, Springer v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed March 9, 2012, Aievoli v. Oldham, et al., filed March 15, 2012, and Waterbury v. SureWest Communications, et al., filed March 26, 2012, and the federal action is called Broering v. Oldham, et al., filed April 18, 2012. The actions generally allege, among other things, that each member of the SureWest board of directors breached fiduciary duties to SureWest and its shareholders by authorizing the sale of SureWest to the Company for consideration that allegedly was unfair to the SureWest shareholders and agreed to terms that allegedly unduly restrict other bidders from making a competing offer. The complaints also allege that the Company and SureWest aided and abetted the breaches of fiduciary duties allegedly committed by the members of the SureWest board of directors. The Broering complaint also alleges, among other things, that the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012 did not make sufficient disclosures regarding the merger, that SureWests board should have appointed an independent committee to negotiate the transaction and that SureWest should have gone back to another bidder to create a competitive bid process. The lawsuits seek equitable relief, including an order to prevent the defendants from consummating the merger on the agreed-upon terms and/or an award of unspecified money damages. On March 14, 2012, the Placer County Superior Court entered an order consolidating the Needles, Errecart and Springer actions into a single action under the caption In re SureWest Communications Shareholder Litigation. Under the terms of this order, all cases subsequently filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Placer, that relate to the same subject matter and involve similar questions of law or fact were to be consolidated with these cases as well. This included the Aievoli and Waterbury cases. On April 10, 2012, the plaintiff in Waterbury filed a request for voluntary dismissal of her complaint without prejudice. On May 18, 2012, pursuant to the parties stipulation, the federal court entered an order staying the Broering action for 90 days. On June 1, 2012, the parties entered into a proposed settlement of all of the shareholder actions without any admission of liability by the Company or the other defendants. Pursuant to the proposed settlement, SureWest agreed to make, and subsequently made,
certain additional disclosures in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC in advance of the special meeting of SureWest shareholders held on June 12, 2012. The proposed settlement also provided that plaintiffs counsel collectively are to receive attorneys fees of $525,000, of which the Company is to pay $36,250, with the balance to be paid by SureWest and its insurer. The proposed settlement is subject to approval by the Placer County Superior Court. Upon approval by the court, the consolidated state court actions and the federal action will be dismissed with prejudice.
On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting their fiber optic cables to our utility poles. Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs. Salsgiver originally claimed to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million and did not request a specific dollar amount in damages. We believe that these claims are without merit and that the alleged damages are completely unfounded. We intend to defend against these claims vigorously. In the third quarter of 2008, we filed preliminary objections and responses to Salsgivers complaint. However, the court ruled against our preliminary objections. On November 3, 2008, we responded to Salsgivers amended complaint and filed a counter-claim for trespass, alleging that Salsgiver attached cables to our poles without an authorized agreement and in an unsafe manner. We are currently in the discovery and deposition stage. Consolidated filed a motion for summary judgment on June 18, 2012 and the court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on August 30, 2012. In addition, we have asked the FCC Enforcement Bureau to address Salsgivers unauthorized pole attachments and safety violations on those attachments. We believe that these are violations of an FCC order regarding Salsgivers complaint against us. We do not believe that these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Two of our subsidiaries, Consolidated Communications of Pennsylvania Company LLC (CCPA) and Consolidated Communications Enterprise Services Inc. (CCES), received assessment notices from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue increasing the amounts owed for Pennsylvania Gross Receipt Taxes for the tax period ending December 31, 2009. These two assessments adjusted the subsidiaries combined total outstanding taxable gross receipts liability (with interest) to approximately $2.3 million. In addition, based upon recently completed audits of CCES for 2008, 2009 and 2010, we believe the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may issue additional assessments totaling approximately $1.7 million for Gross Receipt Taxes allegedly owed. Our CCPA subsidiary has also been notified by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that they will conduct a gross receipts audit for the calendar year 2008. An appeal challenging the 2009 CCPA assessment was filed with the Department of Revenues Board of Appeals on September 15, 2011, and we filed a similar appeal for CCES with the Board of Appeals on November 11, 2011 challenging the 2009 CCES assessment. We also intend to appeal any adverse decisions from the Board of Appeals involving CCPA or CCES to the Commonwealths Board of Finance and Revenue. At the Board of Finance and Revenue, we anticipate that these matters will be continued pending the outcome of present litigation in Commonwealth Court between Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Docket No. 266 F.R. 2008). The Gross Receipts Tax issues in the Verizon Pennsylvania case are substantially the same as those presently facing CCPA and CCES. In addition, there are numerous telecommunications carriers with Gross Receipts Tax matters dealing with the same issues that are in various stages of appeal before the Board of Finance and Revenue and the Commonwealth Court. Those appeals by other similarly situated telecommunications carriers have been continued until resolution of the Verizon Pennsylvania case. We believe that these assessments and the positions taken by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are without substantial merit. We do not believe that the outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
We are from time to time involved in various other legal proceedings and regulatory actions arising out of our operations. We do not believe that any of these, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.
24. Net Income per Common Share
The following illustrates the earnings allocation method as required by the FASBs authoritative guidance on the treatment of participating securities in the calculation of earnings per share which we utilize in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
|
|
For the three months |
|
For the six months |
| ||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Using Two-class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,906 |
|
$ |
5,513 |
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
120 |
|
162 |
|
245 |
|
294 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders before allocation of earnings to participating securities |
|
2,786 |
|
5,351 |
|
4,545 |
|
12,716 |
| ||||
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
95 |
|
119 |
|
160 |
|
246 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
2,691 |
|
$ |
5,232 |
|
$ |
4,385 |
|
$ |
12,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (1) |
|
29,689 |
|
29,593 |
|
29,689 |
|
29,593 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
(1) To the extent that restricted shares are anti-dilutive, they have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
An additional 0.3 million and 0.4 million shares were not included in the computation of potentially dilutive securities at June 30, 2012 and 2011, because they were anti-dilutive.
25. Business Segments
The Company is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly integrated, reportable business segments: Telephone Operations and Other Operations. Telephone Operations consists of a wide range of telecommunications services, including local and long-distance service, DSL Internet access, IPTV, VOIP service, custom calling features, private line services, carrier access services, network capacity services over a regional fiber optic network, mobile services and directory publishing. The Company also operates two complementary non-core businesses that comprise Other Operations, including telephone services to correctional facilities and equipment sales. Management evaluates the performance of these business segments based upon net revenue and operating income.
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Telephone operations |
|
$ |
85,012 |
|
$ |
84,809 |
|
$ |
170,095 |
|
$ |
172,203 |
|
Other operations |
|
7,993 |
|
7,814 |
|
16,274 |
|
15,861 |
| ||||
Total net revenue |
|
93,005 |
|
92,623 |
|
186,369 |
|
188,064 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating expense telephone operations |
|
50,011 |
|
48,797 |
|
102,899 |
|
97,742 |
| ||||
Operating expense other operations |
|
7,073 |
|
7,157 |
|
14,399 |
|
14,595 |
| ||||
Total operating expense |
|
57,084 |
|
55,954 |
|
117,298 |
|
112,337 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization telephone operations |
|
21,664 |
|
21,778 |
|
43,593 |
|
43,725 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization other operations |
|
205 |
|
209 |
|
413 |
|
420 |
| ||||
Total depreciation expense |
|
21,869 |
|
21,987 |
|
44,006 |
|
44,145 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating income telephone operations |
|
13,337 |
|
14,234 |
|
23,603 |
|
30,736 |
| ||||
Operating income - other operations |
|
715 |
|
448 |
|
1,462 |
|
846 |
| ||||
Total operating income |
|
14,052 |
|
14,682 |
|
25,065 |
|
31,582 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
(16,893 |
) |
(12,397 |
) |
(31,493 |
) |
(24,336 |
) | ||||
Investment income |
|
6,762 |
|
6,097 |
|
13,228 |
|
13,014 |
| ||||
Other, net |
|
185 |
|
210 |
|
199 |
|
437 |
| ||||
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
4,106 |
|
$ |
8,592 |
|
$ |
6,999 |
|
$ |
20,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Telephone operations |
|
$ |
10,904 |
|
$ |
10,634 |
|
$ |
22,055 |
|
$ |
20,625 |
|
Other operations |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
96 |
|
79 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
10,927 |
|
$ |
10,657 |
|
$ |
22,151 |
|
$ |
20,704 |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Goodwill: |
|
|