Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x  Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

or

o  Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                to               

Commission File Number 001-11339

Protective Life Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2801 Highway 280 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(205) 268-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o  No x

Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.50 Par Value, outstanding as of November 4, 2009: 85,580,166

Table of Contents

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

2

Table of Contents

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.                                      BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Protective Life Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. The year-end consolidated condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-01 — Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 168”).  In June of 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 (effective July 1, 2009) to replace FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 162”) and authorize the Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) as the new source for authoritative U.S. GAAP and ends the practice of FASB issuing standards in the familiar forms. On July 1, 2009, the FASB implemented the ASC as the authoritative source, along with SEC guidance, for U.S. GAAP through issuance of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) 2009-01. The FASB will no longer issue Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, but rather will issue Updates that will provide background information about the amended guidance along with a basis for conclusions regarding the change.  These Updates will amend the ASC to reflect the new guidance issued by the FASB. The Company implemented the use of the ASC in the third quarter of 2009. The ASC changed the way the Company will reference authoritative accounting literature in its filings. The recently adopted standards are now part of the ASC. Accounting standards not yet adopted will consist of Updates as well as Statements issued before July 1, 2009, that are not yet effective.

ASU No. 2009-05 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.  In August of 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset and/or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets; 2) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of Topic 820. This Update is effective for the Company on September 30, 2009. This Update did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

ASU No. 2009-06 — Income Taxes - Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and Disclosure Amendments for Nonpublic Entities. In September of 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-06 — Income Taxes — Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and Disclosure Amendments for Nonpublic Entities. This Update provides implementation guidance related to uncertainty in income tax reporting. This Update is effective for the Company on September 30, 2009. Based on our initial review of the Update, no changes in current practice are required. This update did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

6

Table of Contents

In December of 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This guidance impacts the annual goodwill impairment test associated with acquisitions that close both before and after the effective date. This guidance applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact to the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. The Company will apply this guidance as reflected in the ASC to future business combinations.

In December of 2007, the FASB issued guidance that applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding non-controlling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that was, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In March of 2008, the FASB issued guidance that requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments and how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under the ASC Derivatives and Hedging Topic. This guidance was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. This guidance did not require any changes to current accounting. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009.

In February of 2008, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for a transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing, which is not directly addressed by U.S. GAAP. This guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company will apply this guidance to future transfers of financial assets and repurchase financing transactions.

In April of 2008, the FASB issued guidance to improve consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset. This guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In May of 2008, the FASB issued guidance that requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This guidance also clarifies U.S. GAAP related to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. It also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. This guidance does not apply to financial guarantee insurance contracts that would be within the scope of the ASC Derivatives and Hedging Topic. This guidance was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. The guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In June of 2008, the FASB issued guidance that addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method. The guidance became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning January 1, 2009. All prior period EPS data presented has been adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of this guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In April of 2009, the FASB issued guidance to provide additional information for estimating fair value in accordance with Fair Value Measurements, located within Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This guidance also includes information on identifying circumstances which indicate that a transaction is not orderly. This guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied

7

Table of Contents

prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early adopt the guidance in the first quarter of 2009. Adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In April of 2009, the FASB issued guidance to amend the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments of debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This guidance addresses the timing of impairment recognition and provides greater clarity to investors about the credit and non-credit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. Impairments will continue to be measured at fair value with credit losses recognized in earnings and non-credit losses recognized in other comprehensive income. This guidance also requires increased and timelier disclosures regarding measurement techniques, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early adopt the guidance in the first quarter of 2009, and recorded total other-than-temporary impairments during the three months ended March 31, 2009, of approximately $117.3 million with $27.5 million of this amount recorded in other comprehensive income. The impact of recording a portion of the other-than-temporary impairments in other comprehensive income resulted in an increase in net income of $17.9 million or $0.25 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The adoption of the guidance did not require a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2009, since all other-than-temporary impairments recorded by the Company in prior periods were credit related losses.

In April of 2009, the FASB issued guidance to address concerns for more transparent and timely information in financial reporting by requiring quarterly disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. The guidance relates to fair value disclosures for financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair value. This guidance requires qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all financial instruments not measured at fair value. This guidance became effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this guidance in the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In May of 2009, the FASB issued guidance that establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In addition, it provides guidance on the circumstances that require entities to recognize events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date and the types of disclosures that need to be made about them. This guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The guidance became effective for the Company on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

ASU No. 2009-12 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent). In September of 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-12 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent).  This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). This Update permits the use of a practical expedient when determining the net asset value. If the practical expedient is used, increased disclosures are required. This Update will become effective for the Company as of December 31, 2009. The Company does not believe this Update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

ASU No. 2009-13 — Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements-a consensus of the FASB EITF. In October of 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13 — Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements-a consensus of the FASB EITF.  This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 605-25 for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of those amendments, multiple-deliverable arrangements will be separated in more circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. This Update also requires additional disclosures related to contracts with multiple deliverables. This Update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into beginning on January 1, 2011. The Company does not believe this Update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

8

Table of Contents

ASU No. 2009-14 — Software - Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements-a consensus of the FASB EITF. In October of 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14 — Software — Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements-a consensus of the FASB EITF.  The amendments in this Update change the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality, are no longer within the scope of the software revenue guidance in Subtopic 985-605. This Update is effective for revenue arrangements entered into beginning on January 1, 2011. The Company does not believe this Update will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In December of 2008, the FASB issued guidance that requires additional disclosures related to Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This guidance will provide users of financial statements with an understanding of: 1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies and strategies, 2) the major categories of plan assets, 3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, 4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan assets for the period, and 5) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. This guidance does not require any changes to current accounting. The disclosure requirements will be effective for the Company for the period ending December 31, 2009. The Company does not expect this guidance to have an impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In June of 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to accounting for transfers of financial assets. This guidance improves the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows; and a continuing interest in transferred financial assets. This guidance also eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for the de-recognition of financial assets, and calls upon sellers of the assets to make additional disclosures about them. This guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This guidance will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In June of 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends certain concepts related to variable interest entities. Among other accounting and disclosure requirements, this guidance replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. A company has to determine whether or not it should provide consolidated reporting of an entity based upon the entity’s purpose and design and the parent company’s ability to direct the entity’s actions. This guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This guidance will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Significant Accounting Policies

For a full description of significant accounting policies, see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report. There were no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, other than those related to credit losses and the FASB guidance that was adopted which is referenced under ASC Investments-Debt Equity Securities Topic, as discussed in Note 2, Investment Operations, and the following:

Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits — The Company establishes liabilities for guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) on our variable annuity products. U.S. GAAP requires the GMWB liability to be marked-to-market using current implied volatilities for the equity indices. The methods used to estimate the liabilities employ assumptions about mortality, lapses, policyholder behavior, equity market returns, interest rates, the Company’s nonperformance risk measure, and market volatility. The Company assumes mortality of 65% of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1994 Variable Annuity Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit (“GMDB”) Mortality Table. Differences between the actual experience and the assumptions used result in variances in profit and could result in losses. In the first quarter of 2009, the assumption for long term volatility used for projection purposes was updated to reflect recent market conditions. The liability calculation was changed to reflect a rate increase for all GMWB policyholders.

9

Table of Contents

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the previously reported financial statements and accompanying notes to make the prior year amounts comparable to those of the current year. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or shareowners’ equity.

2.                                      INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

Net realized investment gains (losses) for all other investments are summarized as follows:

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, gross gains on investments available-for-sale (fixed maturities, equity securities, and short-term investments) were $9.0 million and $29.1 million, respectively.

The amortized cost and estimated market value of the Company’s investments classified as available-for-sale as of September 30, 2009, are as follows:

As of September 30, 2009, the Company had an additional $3.1 billion of fixed maturities, $3.1 million of equity securities, and $242.7 million of short-term investments classified as trading securities.

10

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and estimated market value of available-for-sale fixed maturities as of September 30, 2009, by expected maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities are derived from estimated rates of prepayment that may differ from actual rates of prepayment.

Each quarter the Company reviews investments with unrealized losses and tests for other-than-temporary impairments. The Company analyzes various factors to determine if any specific other-than-temporary asset impairments exist. These include, but are not limited to: 1) actions taken by rating agencies, 2) default by the issuer, 3) the significance of the decline, 4) the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment until recovery, 5) the time period during which the decline has occurred, 6) an economic analysis of the issuer’s industry, and 7) the financial strength, liquidity, and recoverability of the issuer. Management performs a security by security review each quarter in evaluating the need for any other-than-temporary impairments. Although no set formula is used in this process, the investment performance, collateral position, and continued viability of the issuer are significant measures considered. Once a determination has been made that a specific other-than-temporary impairment exists, the security’s basis is adjusted and an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized. Equity securities that are other-than temporarily impaired are written down to fair value with a realized loss recognized in earnings. Other-than-temporary impairments to debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell and does not expect to be required to sell before recovering the security’s amortized cost are written down to discounted expected future cash flows (“post impairment cost”) and credit losses are recorded in earnings. The difference between the securities’ discounted expected future cash flows and the fair value of the securities is recognized in other comprehensive income as a non-credit portion of the recognized other-than-temporary impairment. When calculating the post impairment cost for residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities, the Company considers all known market data related to cash flows to estimate future cash flows. When calculating the post impairment cost for corporate debt securities, the Company considers all contractual cash flows to estimate expected future cash flows. To calculate the post impairment cost, the expected future cash flows are discounted at the original purchase yield. Debt securities that the Company intends to sell or expects to be required to sell before recovery are written down to fair value with the change recognized in earnings.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairments of investments of $14.9 million and $181.1 million, respectively. Of the $14.9 million of impairments for the three months ended September 30, 2009, $31.0 million was recorded in earnings and $16.1 million of non-credit gains was recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). These non-credit gains were caused by recognizing, in the current quarter, credit losses in earnings that had previously been recognized as non-credit losses in other comprehensive income (loss). Of the $181.1 million of impairments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, $161.8 million was recorded in earnings and $19.3 million was recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were $0.2 million and $19.6 million of other-than-temporary impairments related to equity securities, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were $14.7 million and $161.5 million of other-than-temporary impairments related to debt securities, respectively.

For the three months ended September 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairments related to debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell and does not expect to be required to sell prior to recovering amortized cost were $14.7 million, of which $30.8 million of credit losses were recognized in earnings, and $16.1 million of non-credit gains were recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). These non-credit gains were caused by recognizing, in the current quarter, credit losses in earnings that had previously been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) as non-credit losses. During this period, there were no other-than-temporary impairments related to debt securities that the Company intends to sell or expects to be required to sell.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairments related to debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell and does not expect to be required to sell prior to recovering amortized cost were $131.1 million, with $111.8 million of credit losses recorded on debt securities in earnings, and $19.3 million of non-credit losses recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). During the same period,

11

Table of Contents

other-than-temporary impairments related to debt securities that the Company intends to sell or expects to be required to sell were $30.4 million and were recorded in earnings.

The following chart is a rollforward of credit losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, on debt securities held by the Company for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):

The following table includes the Company’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2009:

For commercial mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months, $45.5 million of the total $48.7 million unrealized loss relates to securities issued in Company-sponsored commercial loan securitizations. These losses relate primarily to market illiquidity as opposed to underlying credit concerns. Factors such as credit enhancements within the deal structures and the underlying collateral performance and characteristics support the recoverability of the investments. The other corporate bonds category has gross unrealized losses greater than 12 months of $521.6 million as of September 30, 2009. These losses relate primarily to fluctuations in credit spreads. The aggregate decline in market value of these securities was deemed temporary due to positive factors supporting the recoverability of the respective investments. Positive factors considered include credit ratings, the financial health of the issuer, the continued access of the issuer to capital markets, and other pertinent information including the Company’s ability and intent to hold these securities to recovery. The Company does not consider these unrealized loss positions to be other-than-temporary, based on the factors discussed and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold equity investments until the fair values recover, and does not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell the securities before recovering the Company’s amortized cost of debt securities.

As of September 30, 2009, the Company had bonds in our available-for-sale portfolio, which were rated below investment grade of $2.5 billion and had an amortized cost of $3.2 billion. In addition, included in our trading portfolio, the Company held $412.5 million of securities which were rated below investment grade. As of September 30, 2009, approximately $28.3 million of the bonds rated below investment grade were securities issued in Company-sponsored commercial mortgage loan securitizations. Approximately $588.3 million of the below investment grade bonds were not publicly traded.

12

Table of Contents

The change in unrealized gains (losses), net of income tax, on fixed maturity and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale is summarized as follows:

3.                                      NON-RECOURSE FUNDING OBLIGATIONS

Non-recourse funding obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2009, on a consolidated basis, listed by issuer, are reflected in the following table:

4.                                      COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is contingently liable to obtain a $20 million letter of credit under indemnity agreements with directors. Such agreements provide insurance protection in excess of the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance in-force at the time up to $20 million. Should certain events occur constituting a change in control, the Company must obtain the letter of credit upon which directors may draw for defense or settlement of any claim relating to performance of their duties as directors. The Company has similar agreements with certain of its officers providing up to $10 million in indemnification that are not secured by the obligation to obtain a letter of credit. These obligations are in addition to the customary obligation to indemnify officers and directors contained in the Company’s bylaws.

Under insurance guaranty fund laws, in most states insurance companies doing business therein can be assessed up to prescribed limits for policyholder losses incurred by insolvent companies. The Company does not believe such assessments will be materially different from amounts already provided for in the financial statements. Most of these laws do provide, however, that an assessment may be excused or deferred if it would threaten an insurer’s own financial strength.

A number of civil jury verdicts have been returned against insurers, broker dealers and other providers of financial services involving sales, refund or claims practices, alleged agent misconduct, failure to properly supervise representatives, relationships with agents or persons with whom the insurer does business, and other matters. Often these lawsuits have resulted in the award of substantial judgments that are disproportionate to the actual damages, including material amounts of punitive and non-economic compensatory damages. In some states, juries, judges, and arbitrators have substantial discretion in awarding punitive non-economic compensatory damages which creates the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments or awards in any given lawsuit or arbitration. Arbitration awards are subject to very limited appellate review. In addition, in some class action and other lawsuits, companies have made material settlement payments. The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is involved in such litigation and arbitration in the ordinary course of business. The occurrence of such litigation and arbitration may become more frequent and/or severe when general economic conditions have deteriorated. Although the Company cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation or arbitration, the Company does not believe that any such outcome will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of the operations.

13

Table of Contents

5.                                      STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Performance shares awarded during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the estimated fair value of the awards at grant date are as follows:

The criteria for payment of performance awards is based primarily upon a comparison of the Company’s average return on average equity over a four-year period (earlier upon the death, disability, or retirement of the executive, or in certain circumstances, upon a change in control of the Company) to that of a comparison group of publicly held life and multi-line insurance companies. For the 2008 awards, if the Company’s results are below the 25th percentile of the comparison group, no portion of the award is earned. For the 2005-2007 awards, if the Company’s results are below the 40th percentile of the comparison group, no portion of the award is earned. If the Company’s results are at or above the 90th percentile, the award maximum is earned. Awards are paid in shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As noted in the table above, no awards were granted in the first nine months of 2009.

Between 1996 and 2009, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) were granted to certain officers of the Company to provide long-term incentive compensation based solely on the performance of the Company’s Common Stock. The SARs are exercisable either five years after the date of grants or in three or four equal annual installments beginning one year after the date of grant (earlier upon the death, disability, or retirement of the officer, or in certain circumstances, of a change in control of the Company) and expire after ten years or upon termination of employment. The SARs activity as well as weighted-average base price for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, is as follows:

The SARs issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, had an estimated fair value at grant date of $0.9 million. The fair value was estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions used in the model for the SARs granted (the simplified method under the ASC Compensation-Stock Compensation Topic was used for these awards) were as follows: expected volatility ranging from 68.5% to 77.2%, a risk-free interest rate ranging from 2.7% to 3.0%, a dividend rate ranging from 2.3% to 10.3%, a zero percent forfeiture rate, and an expected exercise date of 2015. The Company will pay an amount in stock equal to the difference between the specified base price of the Company’s Common Stock and the market value at the exercise date for each SAR.

Additionally, the Company issued 580,700 restricted stock units during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. These awards have a total fair value of $2.2 million. Approximately half of these restricted stock units vest in 2012 and the remainder vest in 2013.

14

Table of Contents

6.                                      DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN AND UNFUNDED EXCESS BENEFITS PLAN

Components of the net periodic benefit cost of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan and unfunded excess benefits plan are as follows:

During April of 2009, the Company contributed $2.0 million to the defined benefit pension plan. The Company does not plan to contribute additional cash to its defined benefit pension plan during the remainder of 2009.

In addition to pension benefits, the Company provides life insurance benefits to eligible retirees and limited healthcare benefits to eligible retirees who are not yet eligible for Medicare. For a closed group of retirees over age 65, the Company provides a prescription drug benefit. The cost of these plans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was immaterial to the Company’s financial statements.

7.                                      EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including shares issuable under various deferred compensation plans. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period, assuming the shares were not anti-dilutive, including shares issuable under various stock-based compensation plans and stock purchase contracts.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company issued 15.5 million shares of common stock through a public offering. This offering generated approximately $132.8 million of net proceeds to the Company.

15

Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is presented below: