Skip to main content

Music publishers file $250 million lawsuit against Twitter, allege Musk made copyright infringement worse

Twitter is facing a $250 million lawsuit from a group of music publishers who allege the company has unfairly benefited from allowing the sharing of copyrighted material.

A group of music publishers has filed a $250 million lawsuit against Twitter, claiming years of copyright infringement on the platform have gotten even worse under new owner Elon Musk.

The lawsuit, filed by a group of 17 publishers led by the National Music Publishers’ Association, alleges that Twitter has for years unfairly benefited from copyright infringement by allowing users to share unlicensed music, while competitors such as TikTok, Meta, and Snapchat all pay licensing fees, according to a report by The Guardian.

"The availability of videos with music, including copies of Publishers’ musical compositions, furthers Twitter’s financial interests both because it drives user engagement, and thus advertising revenue, and because Twitter does not pay fees to license musical compositions," the lawsuit reads. "Providing free, unlicensed music gives the Twitter platform an unfair advantage over competing platforms, such as TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and others."

ELON MUSK JOKES ABOUT NEW POSITION AT TWITTER: 'VP OF WITCHCRAFT & PROPAGANDA'

The suit further alleges that the issue has gotten worse since Musk purchased the platform, going so far as to include screenshots of the owner's tweets that were critical of copyright rules.

"Current copyright law in general goes absurdly far beyond protecting the original creator," Musk tweeted in May of last year. "Overzealous DMCA is a plague on humanity."

"This statement and others like it exert pressure on Twitter employees, including those in its trust and safety team, on issues relating to copyright and infringement," the lawsuit reads in response to the Musk tweet.

ELON MUSK PASSES THE TWITTER CEO TORCH TO LINDA YACCARINO

A list of 1,700 songs is included in the lawsuit, which claims the songs had been uploaded by users "who had already been identified in multiple earlier notices," yet Twitter "did not expeditiously remove or disable access."

"Twitter’s policies demonstrate that Twitter views itself, not the law, as the arbiter of what content is permitted on the Twitter platform," the lawsuit, which is asking for $150,000 statutory penalty for each of the violations, reads. "There are thousands of instances where Twitter waited 30 days or more to remove or disable access to the content identified."

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Twitter responded to a FOX Business request for comment with an automated poop emoji.

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.