FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33280
HFF, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
51-0610340 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Oxford Centre |
|
|
301 Grant Street, Suite 600 |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15219 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(412) 281-8714
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and of Class B common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding as of October 31, 2008 was 16,446,480
shares and 1 share, respectively.
HFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 |
|
|
|
|
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which reflect our
current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. You
can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as outlook, believes,
expects, potential, continues, may, will, should, seeks, approximately, predicts,
intends, plans, estimates, anticipates or the negative version of these words or other
comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to
differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe these factors include, but
are not limited to, those described under Risk Factors. These factors should not be construed as
exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or
otherwise.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING THE REGISTRANT
In connection with our initial public offering of our Class A common stock in February 2007,
we effected a reorganization of our business, which had previously been conducted through HFF
Holdings LLC (HFF Holdings) and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. and HFF Securities L.P. (together, the Operating Partnerships) and Holliday
GP Corp. (Holliday GP). In the reorganization, HFF, Inc., a newly-formed Delaware corporation,
purchased from HFF Holdings all of the shares of Holliday GP, which is the sole general partner of
each of the Operating Partnerships, and approximately 45% of the partnership units in each of the
Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating Partnerships held by Holliday
GP) in exchange for the net proceeds from the initial public offering and one share of Class B
common stock of HFF, Inc. Following this reorganization and as of the closing of the initial public
offering on February 5, 2007, HFF, Inc. is a holding company holding partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships and all of the outstanding shares of Holliday GP. HFF Holdings and HFF,
Inc., through their wholly-owned subsidiaries, are the only limited partners of the Operating
Partnerships. We refer to these transactions collectively in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as
the Reorganization Transactions. Unless we state otherwise, the information in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to these Reorganization Transactions.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to (1) HFF Holdings refer solely to HFF
Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was previously the holding company for our
consolidated subsidiaries, and not to any of its subsidiaries, (2) HFF LP refer to Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (3) HFF Securities refer to HFF Securities
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered broker-dealer, (4) Holliday GP refer to
Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation and the general partner of HFF LP and HFF Securities, (5)
HoldCo LLC refer to HFF Partnership Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF, Inc. and (6) Holdings Sub refer to HFF LP Acquisition LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF Holdings. Our business
operations are conducted by HFF LP and HFF Securities which are sometimes referred to in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Operating Partnerships. Also, except where specifically
noted, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Company, we or us mean HFF,
Inc., the newly-formed Delaware corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect
to the Reorganization Transactions.
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(audited) |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
26,740 |
|
|
$ |
43,739 |
|
Restricted cash (Note 8) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
Investments (Note 4) |
|
|
9,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 and
$0, respectively |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
Receivable from affiliate (Note 19) |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
Mortgage notes receivable (Note 9) |
|
|
100,256 |
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
8,646 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets, net |
|
|
148,345 |
|
|
|
92,195 |
|
Property and equipment, net (Note 5) |
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
124,129 |
|
|
|
131,408 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
Intangible assets, net (Note 6) |
|
|
7,198 |
|
|
|
5,769 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
289,529 |
|
|
$ |
240,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 8) |
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
Warehouse line of credit (Note 9) |
|
|
100,256 |
|
|
|
41,000 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
8,356 |
|
|
|
12,952 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
112,102 |
|
|
|
58,457 |
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
Payable under the tax receivable agreement (Note 14) |
|
|
108,287 |
|
|
|
117,406 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion (Note 8) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
224,480 |
|
|
|
180,648 |
|
Minority interest (Note 16) |
|
|
25,871 |
|
|
|
21,784 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 175,000,000 authorized,
and 16,446,480 and 16,445,000 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 1 share authorized, and
1 share outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
26,036 |
|
|
|
25,353 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
12,957 |
|
|
|
12,527 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
39,178 |
|
|
|
38,044 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
289,529 |
|
|
$ |
240,476 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
29,441 |
|
|
$ |
66,463 |
|
|
$ |
103,003 |
|
|
$ |
199,565 |
|
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Other |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,034 |
|
|
|
68,029 |
|
|
|
106,803 |
|
|
|
203,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
20,014 |
|
|
|
39,166 |
|
|
|
69,365 |
|
|
|
116,854 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
14,307 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
5,689 |
|
|
|
6,012 |
|
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
4,635 |
|
Supplies, research, and printing |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
Interest on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
54,429 |
|
|
|
105,013 |
|
|
|
162,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) / income |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
40,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(404 |
) |
Decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
15,766 |
|
|
|
9,412 |
|
|
|
44,375 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
36,536 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
8,808 |
|
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
24,229 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
12,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income earned prior to IPO and reorganization (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Class A common stockholders |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share of Class A common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
12,307 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
24,229 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
Amortization of investment security discounts |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
7,506 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
(3,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
Gain on sale or disposition of assets, net |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Mortgage service rights assumed |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
Receivable from /payable to affiliates |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
2,411 |
|
Payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
(5,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
(59,256 |
) |
|
|
57,950 |
|
Net borrowings on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
59,256 |
|
|
|
(57,950 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(4,610 |
) |
|
|
1,575 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
(4,596 |
) |
|
|
16,589 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(6,704 |
) |
|
|
67,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(4,273 |
) |
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(9,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(10,168 |
) |
|
|
(4,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(56,350 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
272,118 |
|
Purchase of ownership interests in Operating Partnerships and Holliday GP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215,931 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
Distributions to members and minority interest holder |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(7,070 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(7,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(16,999 |
) |
|
|
56,215 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
43,739 |
|
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
26,740 |
|
|
$ |
59,560 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
HFF, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
HFF, Inc., through its Operating Partnerships, Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited
partnership (HFF LP), and HFF Securities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered
broker-dealer (HFF Securities and together with HFF LP, the Operating Partnerships), is a
financial intermediary and provides capital markets services including debt placement, investment
sales, structured finance, private equity, investment banking and advisory services, note sales and
note sale advisory services and commercial loan servicing and commercial real estate structured
financing placements mainly in the United States through its 18 offices in the United States.
HFF LP was acquired on June 16, 2003 and accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141). The total purchase price
of $8.8 million was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition.
During 2004, HFF LP and Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation (Holliday GP), formed HFF
Securities. HFF Securities is a broker-dealer that performs private placements of securities by
raising equity capital from institutional investors for discretionary, commingled real estate funds
to execute real estate acquisitions, recapitalizations, developments, debt investments, and other
real estate-related strategies. HFF Securities may also provide other investment banking and
advisory services on various project or entity-level strategic assignments such as mergers and
acquisitions, sales and divestitures, recapitalizations and restructurings, privatizations,
management buyouts, and arranging joint ventures for specific real estate strategies.
Offering and Reorganization
HFF, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed in November 2006 in connection with a proposed
initial public offering of its Class A common stock. On November 9, 2006, HFF, Inc. filed a
registration statement on Form S-1 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) relating to a proposed underwritten initial public offering of 14,300,000 shares of Class A
common stock of HFF, Inc. (the Offering). On January 30, 2007, the SEC declared the registration
statement on Form S-1 effective and HFF, Inc. priced 14,300,000 shares for the initial public
offering at a price of $18.00 per share. On January 31, 2007, HFF, Inc.s common stock began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HF.
The proceeds of the public offering were used to purchase from HFF Holdings all of the shares of
Holliday GP and purchase from HFF Holdings partnership units representing approximately 39% of each
of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating Partnerships held by
Holliday GP).
On February 21, 2007, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 2,145,000
shares of Class A common stock (15% of original issuance) at $18.00 per share. These proceeds were
used to purchase HFF Holdings partnership units representing approximately 6.0% of each of the
Operating Partnerships. The Company did not retain any of the proceeds from the Offering.
In addition to cash received for its sale of all of the shares of Holliday GP and approximately 45%
of partnership units of each of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships held by Holliday GP), HFF Holdings also received an exchange right that will
permit HFF Holdings to exchange interests in the Operating Partnerships for shares of (i) HFF,
Inc.s Class A common stock (the Exchange Right) and (ii) rights under a tax receivable agreement
between HFF, Inc. and HFF Holdings (the TRA). See Notes 17 and 14 for further discussion of the
exchange right held by the majority interest holder and the tax receivable agreement, respectively.
As a result of the reorganization, HFF, Inc. became a holding company through a series of
transactions pursuant to a sale and purchase agreement. Pursuant to the Offering and
reorganization, HFF, Inc.s sole assets are through its wholly-owned subsidiary HFF Partnership
Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Partnership Holdings), partnership interests
in HFF LP and HFF Securities and all of the shares of Holliday GP. The transactions that occurred
in connection with the initial public offering and reorganization are referred to as the
Reorganization Transactions.
6
The Reorganization Transactions are being treated, for financial reporting purposes, as a
reorganization of entities under common control. As such, these financial statements present the
consolidated financial position and results of operations as if HFF, Inc., Holliday GP and the
Operating Partnerships (collectively referred to as the Company) were consolidated for all
periods presented. All income earned by the Operating Partnerships prior to the offering is
attributable to members of HFF Holdings. Income earned by the Operating Partnerships subsequent to
the offering and attributable to the members of HFF Holdings is recorded as minority interest in
the consolidated financial statements, with remaining income less applicable income taxes
attributable to Class A common stockholders.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September
30, 2007, include the accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Holliday GP and Partnership Holdings. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
The purchase of shares of Holliday GP and partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships
are treated as reorganization under common control for financial reporting purposes. HFF Holdings
owned 100% of Holliday GP, HFF LP Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Holdings
Sub), and the Operating Partnerships prior to the Reorganization Transactions and continues to
control these entities through HFF, Inc. The initial purchase of shares of Holliday GP and the
initial purchase of units in the Operating Partnerships were accounted for at historical cost, with
no change in basis for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the net assets of HFF Holdings
purchased by HFF, Inc. are reported in the consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. at HFF
Holdings historical cost.
As the sole stockholder of Holliday GP, the sole general partner of the Operating Partnerships,
HFF, Inc. now operates and controls all of the business and affairs of the Operating Partnerships.
HFF, Inc. consolidates the financial results of the Operating Partnerships, and the ownership
interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships is treated as a minority interest in HFF,
Inc.s consolidated financial statements. HFF Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Holdings Sub, and HFF, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries Partnership Holdings and
Holliday GP, are the only partners of the Operating Partnerships following the offering.
Income earned by the Operating Partnerships subsequent to the offering and attributable to the
members of HFF Holdings based on their remaining ownership interest (see Notes 15 and 16) is
recorded as minority interest in the consolidated financial statements, with remaining income less
applicable income taxes attributable to Class A common stockholders, and considered in the
determination of earnings per share of Class A common stock (see Note 18).
Reclassifications
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to
conform to the current years presentation.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information, the
instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and should be read
in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, significant accounting policies and disclosures normally provided have been omitted as
such items are disclosed therein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of
normal and recurring entries considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the
interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available as
of the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Therefore, actual results could
differ from those estimates. Furthermore, operating results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending
December 31, 2008.
7
Consolidation
HFF, Inc. controls the activities of the operating partnerships through its 100% ownership interest
of Holliday GP. As such, in accordance with FASB Interpretation 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (revised December 2003) an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (Issued 12/03) and
Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners
Have Certain Rights, Holliday GP consolidates the Operating Partnerships as Holliday GP is the
sole general partner of the Operating Partnerships and the limited partners do not have substantive
participating rights or kick out rights. The ownership interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating
Partnerships is reflected as a minority interest in HFF, Inc.s consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September
30, 2007, include the accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Holliday GP and Partnership Holdings. The ownership interest of HFF Holdings in HFF
LP and HFF Securities is treated as a minority interest in the consolidated financial statements of
HFF, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Income Taxes
HFF, Inc. and Holliday GP are corporations, and the Operating Partnerships are limited
partnerships. The Operating Partnerships are subject to state and local income taxes. Income and
expenses of the Operating Partnerships have been passed through and are reported on the individual
tax returns of the members of HFF Holdings and on the corporate income tax returns of HFF, Inc. and
Holliday GP. Income taxes shown on the Companys Consolidated Statements of Income reflect federal
income taxes of the corporation and business and corporate income taxes in various jurisdictions.
These taxes are assessed on the net income of the corporation, including its share of the Operating
Partnerships net income.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates are recognized in income in the period of the tax rate
change. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Earnings Per Share
Subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions, the Company computes net income per share in
accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net income per share is computed by
dividing income available to Class A common stockholders by the weighted average of Class A common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the assumed conversion of
all dilutive securities (see Note 18). Prior to the Reorganization Transactions, the Company
historically operated as a series of related partnerships and limited liability companies. There
was no single capital structure upon which to calculate historical earnings per share information.
Accordingly, earnings per share information has not been presented for periods prior to the initial
public offering.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include mortgage servicing rights under agreements with third-party lenders,
costs associated with obtaining a FINRA license, a non-compete agreement, and deferred financing
costs.
8
Servicing rights are capitalized for servicing assumed on loans originated and sold to the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and mortgage servicing rights acquired without the
exchange of initial consideration with servicing retained based on an allocation of the carrying
amount of the loan and the servicing right in proportion to the relative fair values at the date of
sale. Servicing rights are recorded at the lower of cost or market. Mortgage servicing rights do
not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable prices. Since there is no
ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted market prices or prices based
on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the fair value of the mortgage
servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows associated with servicing the
loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the fair value of servicing
rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions, including the benefits of servicing
(contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float balances), the cost of servicing,
prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate, the expected life of the cash
flows and the discount rate. The cost of servicing and discount rate are the most sensitive factors
affecting the estimated fair value of the servicing rights. Management estimates a market
participants cost of servicing by analyzing the limited market activity and considering the
Companys own internal servicing costs. Management estimates the discount rate by considering the
various risks involved in the future cash flows of the underlying loans which include the
cancellation of servicing contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and the
incremental risk related to large loans. Management estimates the prepayment levels of the
underlying mortgages by analyzing recent historical experience. Many of the commercial loans being
serviced have financial penalties for prepayment or early payoff before the stated maturity date.
As a result, the Company has consistently experienced a low level of loan runoff. The estimated
value of the servicing rights is impacted by changes in these assumptions.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (SFAS) No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, or SFAS 156. Under SFAS 156, the standard requires an entity
to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability at fair value each time it undertakes an
obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract, regardless of
whether explicit consideration is exchanged. The statement also permits a company to choose to
either subsequently measure servicing rights at fair value and to report changes in fair value in
earnings, or to retain the amortization method whereby servicing rights are recorded at the lower
of cost or fair value and are amortized over their expected life. The Company retained the
amortization method upon adoption of SFAS 156, but began recognizing the fair value of servicing
contracts involving no consideration assumed after January 1, 2007, which resulted in the Company
recording $0.5 million and $1.1 million of intangible assets and a corresponding amount to income
upon initial recognition of the servicing rights for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. The Company recorded $1.1 million and $2.0 million of intangible
assets and a corresponding amount to income upon initial recognition of the servicing rights for
the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. These amounts are
recorded in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Deferred financing costs are deferred and are being amortized by the straight-line method over four
years, which approximates the effective interest method.
HFF Securities has recognized an intangible asset in the amount of $0.1 million for the costs of
obtaining a FINRA license as a broker-dealer. The license is determined to have an indefinite
useful economic life and is, therefore, not being amortized.
The Company evaluates amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or more frequently if
circumstances so indicate, for potential impairment. Indicators of impairment monitored by
management include a decline in the level of serviced loans.
Stock Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective
method. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation costs based on grant-date fair value
for all share-based awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006, as well as for any
awards that were granted prior to the adoption for which requisite service has not been provided as
of January 1, 2006. The Company did not grant any share-based awards prior to January 31, 2007.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and
other forms of equity compensation based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the
grant-date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For restricted
stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value
of the Companys Class A common stock on the
9
date of grant and the purchase price paid by the employee. The Companys awards are generally
subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture
assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis and updated as necessary.
Investments
The Companys available-for-sale securities include United States Treasury Bills. These
investments are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical
instruments. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon quoted prices for
similar instruments in active markets. These investments may be classified as current or long-term
assets and are included in Investments or Other noncurrent assets, respectively, on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets based on managements ability or intention to sell the investment. The
amortization of the discount is recognized as income based on the effective interest method and is
recorded in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The
unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale are recorded net of tax in Accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains or
losses on these securities are computed on a specific-identification basis and recognized in
Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
On a periodic basis, management evaluates the carrying value of investments for impairment. With
respect to the investments in United States Treasury Bills, management considers various criteria,
including the duration and extent of a decline in fair value and the ability and intent of
management to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow the value to recover
to determine whether a decline in fair value is other than temporary. If, after considering these
criteria, management believes that a decline is other than temporary, the carrying value of the
security is written down to fair value and recognized in Interest and other income, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Comprehensive Income
The Company reports all changes in comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income. Comprehensive income includes net income and unrealized gains and losses on securities
available for sale, net of tax.
Comprehensive income was $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, and $4.0 million and $10.4 million, respectively, for the same
periods of 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 will change the accounting and reporting for
minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a
component of equity. This new consolidation method will significantly change the accounting for
transactions with minority interest holders. The provisions of this standard are effective
beginning January 1, 2009. Prior to adoption, the Company will evaluate the impact on its
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This new standard is
designed to reduce complexity in accounting for financial instruments and lessen earnings
volatility caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The standard creates
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to aid comparisons between companies that use
different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The standard, which
is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses on
those assets and liabilities recorded in earnings. The fair value option may be applied on a
financial instrument by financial instrument basis, with a few exceptions, and is irrevocable for
those financial instruments once applied. The fair value option may only be applied to entire
financial instruments, not portions of instruments. The standard does not eliminate disclosures
required by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, or SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, the latter of which is described below. The provisions of the standard
were effective for consolidated financial statements beginning January 1, 2008. The Company did not
elect the fair value option upon adoption of SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008.
10
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). This new
standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in conformity with
GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Prior to this standard, there were
varying definitions of fair value, and the limited guidance for applying those definitions under
GAAP was dispersed among the many accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements.
The new standard defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, since the FASB previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair
value is the relevant measurement attribute. As a result, the new standard does not establish any
new fair value measurements itself, but applies to other accounting standards that require the use
of fair value for recognition or disclosure. In particular, the framework in the new standard will
be required for financial instruments for which fair value is elected.
The new standard requires companies to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments
according to a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of
the information used to determine fair values. Financial instruments carried at fair value will be
classified and disclosed in one of the three categories in accordance with the hierarchy. The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
|
|
|
level 1: Quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs corroborated by market
data; and |
|
|
|
|
level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. |
In addition, the standard requires enhanced disclosure with respect to the activities of those
financial instruments classified within the level 3 category, including a roll-forward analysis of
fair value balance sheet amounts for each major category of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of the unrealized gains and losses for level 3 positions held at the reporting date.
The standard is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and
disclosures about fair value measurements, and encourages entities to combine the fair value
information disclosed under the standard with the fair value information disclosed under other
accounting pronouncements, including SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, where practicable. The provisions of this standard were effective beginning January 1,
2008. Our adoption of the standards provisions did not materially impact our consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2 Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP
FAS 157-2) which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities including, but not limited to, nonfinancial
assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination that are not
subsequently remeasured at fair value and nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value in the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment test. As a result of the issuance of FSP FAS 157-2, the
Company did not apply the provisions of SFAS 157 to the nonfinancial assets and liabilities within
the scope of FSP FAS 157-2.
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS 157-3), which clarifies the
application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key
considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that
financial asset is not active. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 had no impact on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
11
3. Stock Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective
method. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation costs based on grant-date fair value
for all share-based awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006, as well as for any
awards that were granted prior to the adoption for which requisite service has not been provided as
of January 1, 2006. The Company did not grant any share-based awards prior to January 31, 2007.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and
other forms of equity compensation based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the
grant-date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For restricted
stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value
of the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant and the purchase price paid by the
employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation
expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis
and updated as necessary. During the three month period ending September 30, 2008, no vested
restricted stock units were converted to Class A common stock and 38,100 new restricted stock units
were granted. During the three month period ending September 30, 2008, no new stock options were
granted.
The stock compensation cost that has been charged against income for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, which is recorded in
Personnel expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The stock compensation cost that
has been charged against income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 was
$0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. At September 30, 2008, there was approximately $1.6
million of unrecognized compensation cost related to share based awards.
No options were vested or were exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The fair value of vested restricted stock units was $0.2 million at September 30, 2008.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock units is 3 years
as of September 30, 2008.
4. Investments
Investments as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 included available-for-sale securities.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company held investments in United States Treasury
Bills totaling $10.0 million and $0.0 million, respectively. These investments are classified as
current assets in Investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Investments were as follows at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
Discount |
|
Gains |
|
(Losses) |
|
Market Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
9,907 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
12
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,314 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
Capitalized software costs |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
6,038 |
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
11,324 |
|
|
|
11,216 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(5,693 |
) |
|
|
(4,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,631 |
|
|
$ |
6,789 |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, the Company has recorded, within furniture and equipment, office
equipment under capital leases of $0.3 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.2 million,
which is included within depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has recorded office equipment under
capital leases of $0.3 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.1 million. See Note 8 for
discussion of the related capital lease obligations.
6. Intangible Assets
The Companys intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
8,783 |
|
|
$ |
(1,971 |
) |
|
$ |
6,812 |
|
|
$ |
6,085 |
|
|
$ |
(742 |
) |
|
$ |
5,343 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
326 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINRA license |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
9,506 |
|
|
$ |
(2,308 |
) |
|
$ |
7,198 |
|
|
$ |
6,708 |
|
|
$ |
(939 |
) |
|
$ |
5,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company serviced $24.3 billion and $23.2
billion, respectively, of commercial loans. The Company earned $3.5 million and $9.5 million in
servicing fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2008, respectively. The Company earned $3.5 million and $10.2 million in
servicing fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2007, respectively. These revenues are recorded as capital markets services
revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The total commercial loan servicing portfolio includes loans for which there are no corresponding
mortgage servicing rights recorded on the balance sheet, as these servicing rights were assumed
prior to January 1, 2007 and involved no initial consideration paid by the Company. The Company has
recorded mortgage servicing rights of $6.8 million and $5.3 million on $10.5 billion and $7.9
billion, respectively, of the total loans serviced as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
The Company stratifies its servicing portfolio based on the type of loan, including life company
loans, commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), Freddie Mac and limited-service life company
loans.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing of the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The significant assumptions utilized to value servicing rights as
of September 30, 2008 are as follows:
13
Expected life of cash flows: 3 years to 10 years
Discount rate(1): 15% 20%
Prepayment rate: 0% 7%
Inflation rate: 2%
Cost to service: $1,600 $4,004
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the time value of money and the risk of future cash flows related to the
possible cancellation of servicing contracts, transferability restrictions on certain servicing
contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and large loan risk. |
The above assumptions are subject to change based on managements judgments and estimates of future
changes in the risks related to future cash flows and interest rates. Changes in these factors
would cause a corresponding increase or decrease in the prepayment rates and discount rates used in
our valuation model.
Changes in the carrying value of mortgage servicing rights for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
9/30/08 |
|
|
9/30/08 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
Life company limited |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Life company |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,343 |
|
|
$ |
2,699 |
|
|
$ |
(1,230 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,812 |
|
|
$ |
7,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/06 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
9/30/07 |
|
|
9/30/07 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Life company limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life company |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,390 |
|
|
$ |
2,751 |
|
|
$ |
(892 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,249 |
|
|
$ |
4,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts capitalized represent mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated loans
to Freddie Mac and mortgage servicing rights acquired without the exchange of initial
consideration. The Company recorded mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated
loans to Freddie Mac of $1.0 million and $1.6 million on $270.0 million and $496.7 million of
loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2008 and $0.3
million and $0.7 million on $44.0 million and $279.4 million of loans, respectively, during the
three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2007. The Company recorded mortgage servicing
rights acquired without the exchange of initial consideration of $0.5 million and $1.1 million on
$939.2 million and $2.3 billion of loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2008 and $1.1 million and $2.0 million on $2.2 billion and $4.7 billion of
loans, respectively, during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2007. These
amounts are recorded in Interest and Other Income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.7 million and $1.4 million during the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively and $0.5 million and $1.0
million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively and is
recorded in Depreciation and Amortization in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
See Note 2 for further discussion regarding treatment of servicing rights prior to January 1, 2007.
14
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2008 |
|
$ |
454 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,693 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,273 |
|
2011 |
|
|
846 |
|
2012 |
|
|
711 |
|
2013 |
|
|
669 |
|
The weighted-average life of the mortgage servicing rights intangible asset was seven years at
September 30, 2008. The remaining lives of the deferred financing costs and non-compete agreement
intangible assets were one and two years, respectively, at September 30, 2008.
7. Fair Value Measurement
As described in Note 2, the Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 establishes a
valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into the following three levels: Level 1 inputs which are quoted
market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs which are
observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs corroborated by market data for the asset or
liability, and Level 3 inputs which are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions that are
not corroborated by market data. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the
hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The Companys Available for Sale Securities are measured at fair value and are classified within
Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company had an unrealized gain of $21,000, net of tax, on
the available for sale securities in the period ended September 30, 2008, which is recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents fair value measurements for major categories of the Companys
financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
9,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
9,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, from time to time, the Company
measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets may include mortgage
servicing rights and mortgage notes receivable. The mortgage servicing rights were not measured at
fair value during the third quarter of 2008 as the Company continues to utilize the amortization
method under SFAS 156 and the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the carrying
value at September 30, 2008. See Note 6 for further discussion on the assumptions used in valuing
the mortgage servicing rights and impact on earnings during the period. The fair value of the
mortgage notes receivable was based on prices observable in the market for similar loans and
equaled carrying value at September 30, 2008. Therefore, no lower of cost or fair value adjustment
was required.
15
8. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bank term note payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The Credit Agreement
On February 5, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of
America (Amended Credit Agreement). The Amended Credit Agreement is comprised of a $40.0 million
revolving credit facility, which replaced the old Credit Agreement that was paid off in connection
with the initial public offering. The Amended Credit Agreement matures on February 5, 2010 and may
be extended for one year based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. Interest on
outstanding balances is payable at the applicable LIBOR rate (for interest periods of one, two,
three, six or twelve months) plus 200 basis points, 175 basis points or 150 basis points (such rate
is determined from time to time in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, based on our then
applicable consolidated leverage ratio) or at interest equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds
Rate (2.03% at September 30, 2008) plus 0.5% and (b) the Prime Rate (5.0% at September 30, 2008)
plus 1.5%. The Amended Credit Agreement also requires payment of a commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3%
on the unused amount of credit based on the total amount outstanding. The Company did not borrow on
this revolving credit facility during the period February 5, 2007 through September 30, 2008. As of
September 30, 2008, based on Availability, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement as
three times the difference of Consolidated EBITDA, as defined therein, and Consolidated Fixed
Charges, as defined therein, the Company has $30.0 million of the $40.0 million in undrawn line
of credit available under this facility. On October 30, 2007, the Company entered into an
amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to clarify that the $40.0 million line of credit under
the Amended Credit Agreement is available to the Company for purposes of originating such Freddie
Mac loans (see discussion under Note 9 below). Additionally, on June 27, 2008, the Company entered
into an amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to modify the calculation of the Consolidated
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined therein, as it relates to the Quarterly Tax Distributions,
as defined therein, and to modify certain annual and quarterly reporting obligations of HFF LP
under the Amended Credit Agreement.
(b) Letters of Credit and Capital Lease Obligations
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company has outstanding letters of credit of
approximately $0.2 million with the same bank as the revolving credit arrangements as security for
two leases. The Company segregated cash in a separate bank account to collateralize the letters of
credit. The letters of credit expire through 2009 but can be extended for one year.
Capital lease obligations consist of office equipment leases that expire at various dates through
May 2011 and bear interest at rates ranging from 3.65% to 9.00%. A summary of future minimum lease
payments under capital leases at September 30, 2008, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2008 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
2009 |
|
|
88 |
|
2010 |
|
|
51 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
16
9. Warehouse Line of Credit
In 2005, HFF LP obtained an uncommitted, unlimited warehouse line of credit for the purpose of
funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates. In October 2007, this warehouse line was
limited to $150.0 million. In November 2007, the Company entered into a $50.0 million line of
credit note with an additional warehouse lender to serve as a supplement to the existing warehouse
line of credit. The Company also is permitted to use borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement
to originate and subsequently sell mortgages in connection with the Companys participation in
Freddie Macs Multifamily Program Plus ® Seller/Servicer program. Each funding is separately
approved on a transaction-by-transaction basis and is collateralized by a loan and mortgage on a
multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by Freddie Mac. As of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, HFF LP had $100.3 million and $41.0 million, respectively, outstanding on the
warehouse lines of credit and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes receivable. The Company did
not borrow under the Amended Credit Agreement in connection with funding the Freddie Mac mortgage
loans that it originates or otherwise during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or the year
ended December 31, 2007. Interest on the warehouse lines of credit is at the 30-day LIBOR rate
(2.93% and 5.02% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) plus a spread. HFF LP
is also paid interest on its loan secured by a multifamily loan at the rate in the Freddie Mac
note.
10. Lease Commitments
The Company leases various corporate offices, parking spaces, and office equipment under
noncancelable operating leases. These leases have initial terms of one to ten years. The majority
of the leases have termination clauses whereby the term may be reduced by two to seven years upon
prior notice and payment of a termination fee by the Company. Total rental expense charged to
operations was $1.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively during the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and $1.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively during the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2007.
Future minimum rental payments for the next five years under operating leases with noncancelable
terms in excess of one year and without regard to early termination provisions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2008 |
|
$ |
1,258 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4,184 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,971 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,235 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,032 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,947 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time the Company subleases certain office space to subtenants which may be canceled at
any time. The rental income received from these subleases is included as a reduction of occupancy
expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company also leases certain office equipment under capital leases that expire at various dates
through 2011. See Note 5 and Note 8 above for further description of the assets and related
obligations recorded under these capital leases at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
HFF Holdings is not an obligor, nor does it guarantee any of the Companys leases.
11. Servicing
The Company services commercial real estate loans for investors. The servicing portfolio totaled
$24.3 billion and $23.2 billion at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
In connection with its servicing activities, the Company holds funds in escrow for the benefit of
mortgagors for hazard insurance, real estate taxes and other financing arrangements. At September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the funds held in escrow totaled $102.3 million and $99.8 million,
respectively. These funds, and the offsetting liabilities, are not presented in the Companys
consolidated financial statements as they do not represent the assets and liabilities of the
Company. Pursuant to the requirements of the various investors for which the Company services
loans, the Company maintains bank accounts holding escrow funds, which have balances in
excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The fees earned on these escrow funds are reported in capital
markets services revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
17
12. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to its business. The Company cannot estimate with certainty its ultimate
legal and financial liability with respect to any pending matters. In accordance with SFAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, a reserve for estimated losses is recorded when the amount is
probable and can be reasonably estimated. However, the Company believes, based on examination of
such pending matters, that its ultimate liability will not have a material adverse effect on its
business or financial condition.
13. Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes current and deferred taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(2,086 |
) |
|
$ |
6,659 |
|
|
$ |
4,573 |
|
State |
|
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,673 |
) |
|
$ |
7,506 |
|
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
2,135 |
|
|
$ |
3,983 |
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
State |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,295 |
|
|
$ |
4,544 |
|
|
$ |
7,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation between the income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and
the effective tax rate on net income is as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Pre-tax book income |
|
$ |
9,412 |
|
|
$ |
44,375 |
|
Less: income earned prior to IPO and Reorganization Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
Less: income allocated to minority interest holder |
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
24,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax book income after minority interest |
|
$ |
5,361 |
|
|
$ |
17,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Taxes computed at federal rate |
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Effect of deferred tax rate change |
|
|
4,879 |
|
|
|
91.0 |
% |
Adjustment for prior years taxes |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Effect of change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
)% |
Change in income tax benefit payable to stockholder |
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
)% |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
4,833 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, included a
benefit of $0.1 million and expense of $0.4 million of state and local taxes on income allocated to
the minority interest holder, which represents 1.8% and 2.2% of the total effective rate,
respectively.
18
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 754 election tax basis step-up |
|
$ |
138,179 |
|
|
$ |
150,007 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
Net operating loss |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,548 |
|
|
|
150,970 |
|
Less: valuation allowance |
|
|
(15,730 |
) |
|
|
(18,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax asset |
|
|
125,818 |
|
|
|
132,793 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Servicing rights |
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
(1,593 |
) |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
124,225 |
|
|
$ |
131,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the generation of taxable income
during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible or during the periods in which
net operating losses can be utilized. In evaluating the realizability of the deferred tax assets,
management considers all available positive and negative evidence and makes estimates and judgments
regarding the level and timing of future taxable income, including reviewing forward-looking
analyses. Based on this analysis and other quantitative and qualitative factors, management
believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to generate sufficient
taxable income to realize a portion of the deferred tax assets resulting from the initial basis
step up recognized from the Reorganization Transaction. Deferred tax assets representing the tax
benefits to be realized when future payments are made to HFF Holdings under a tax receivable
agreement are currently not more likely than not to be realized and, therefore, have a valuation
allowance of $15.7 million recorded against them. See Note 14 for further information regarding the
Companys tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings. The effects of changes in the Companys
estimates regarding the realization of the deferred tax assets will be included in net income.
Similarly, the effect of subsequent changes in the enacted tax rates will be included in net
income.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109, or FIN 48. FIN 48 prescribes recognition and
measurement standards for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process. The first step is the
determination of whether a tax position should be recognized. Under FIN 48, a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return is to be recognized only if the Company determines that it is
more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax
authorities based upon the technical merits of the position. In step two, for those tax positions
which should be recognized, the measurement of a tax position is determined as being the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The
Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the effect of which was immaterial to the consolidated
financial statements. The Company has determined that no unrecognized tax benefits need to be
recorded as of September 30, 2008.
The Company will recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Interest
and other income. There were no interest or penalties recorded in the three and nine month periods
ending September 30, 2008 and 2007.
19
14. Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, HFF LP and HFF Securities made an election
under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code for 2007, and intend to keep that election in effect
for each taxable year in which an exchange of partnership units for shares occurs. The initial sale
as a result of the offering increased the tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP and HFF
Securities to their fair market value. This increase in tax basis allows the Company to reduce the
amount of future tax payments to the extent that the Company has future taxable income. As a result
of the increase in tax basis, the Company is entitled to future tax benefits of $138.2 million and
has recorded this amount as a deferred tax asset on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has
updated its estimate of these future tax benefits based on the changes to the estimated annual
effective tax rate for 2007. The Company is obligated, however, pursuant to its tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in
U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the Company actually realizes as a result of these
increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company
entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. For purposes
of the tax receivable agreement, actual cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing
the Companys actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been
required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF
Securities as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges had the Company not entered into the
tax receivable agreement.
The Company accounts for the income tax effects and corresponding tax receivable agreement effects
as a result of the initial purchase and the sale of units of the Operating Partnerships in
connection with the Reorganization Transactions and future exchanges of Operating Partnership units
for the Companys Class A shares by recognizing a deferred tax asset for the estimated income tax
effects of the increase in the tax basis of the assets owned by the Operating Partnerships, based
on enacted tax rates at the date of the transaction, less any tax valuation allowance the Company
believes is required. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-10 Accounting by
a Company for the Income Tax Effects of Transactions Among or with its Shareholders under FASB
Statement 109 (EITF 94-10), the tax effects of transactions with shareholders that result in
changes in the tax basis of a companys assets and liabilities will be recognized in equity. If
transactions with shareholders result in the recognition of deferred tax assets from changes in the
companys tax basis of assets and liabilities, the valuation allowance initially required upon
recognition of these deferred assets will be recorded in equity.
While the actual amount and timing of payments under the tax receivable agreement will depend upon
a number of factors, including the amount and timing of taxable income generated in the future,
changes in future tax rates and the value of individual assets, the Company has estimated that the
payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $108.3 million and has recorded this obligation
to HFF Holdings as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008. In conjunction with the filing
of the Companys 2007 federal and state tax returns, the benefit for 2007 relating to the Section
754 basis step-up was finalized resulting in $6.2 million in tax benefits in 2007. As discussed
above, the Company is obligated to remit to HFF Holdings 85% of any such cash savings in federal
and state tax. As such, during August 2008, the Company paid $5.3 million to HFF Holdings under
this tax receivable agreement. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
tax rates used to measure the deferred tax assets were updated which resulted in a reduction of
deferred tax assets of $4.6 million, which resulted in a reduction in the payable under the tax
receivable agreement of $3.9 million. To the extent the Company does not realize all of the tax
benefits in future years, this liability to HFF Holdings may be reduced.
20
15. Supplemental Statements of Income
The Supplemental Statements of Income set forth in the table below are provided to principally give
additional information regarding the Companys changes in ownership interest in the Operating
Partnerships that occurred during the nine month period ending September 30, 2007. The changes in
the Companys ownership interest in the Operating Partnerships are a result of the initial public
offering on January 30, 2007, and the underwriters exercise of their option to purchase additional
shares on February 21, 2007.
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Operating Results
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
1/1/07 |
|
|
1/31/07 |
|
|
2/22/07 |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
|
1/30/07 |
|
|
2/21/07 |
|
|
3/31/07 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
17,467 |
|
|
$ |
12,308 |
|
|
$ |
25,770 |
|
|
$ |
55,545 |
|
|
$ |
79,786 |
|
|
$ |
68,029 |
|
|
$ |
203,360 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
10,817 |
|
|
|
7,960 |
|
|
|
14,556 |
|
|
|
33,333 |
|
|
|
44,355 |
|
|
|
39,166 |
|
|
|
116,854 |
|
Operating, administrative and other |
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
15,174 |
|
|
|
14,270 |
|
|
|
42,922 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
15,602 |
|
|
|
11,096 |
|
|
|
21,133 |
|
|
|
47,831 |
|
|
|
60,407 |
|
|
|
54,429 |
|
|
|
162,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
|
19,379 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
40,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority
interest |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
8,242 |
|
|
|
20,367 |
|
|
|
15,766 |
|
|
|
44,375 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
16,571 |
|
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
36,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
11,513 |
|
|
|
8,808 |
|
|
|
24,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,893 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
12,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income earned prior to IPO and reorg |
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
16. Minority Interest
Minority interest recorded in the consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. relates to the
ownership interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships. As a result of the Reorganization
Transactions discussed in Note 1, partners capital was eliminated from equity and minority
interest of $10.3 million was recorded representing HFF Holdings remaining interest in the
Operating Partnerships following the initial public offering and the underwriters exercise of the
overallotment option on February 21, 2007, along with HFF Holdings proportional share of net
income earned by the Operating Partnership subsequent to the change in ownership. The table below
sets forth the minority interest amount recorded during the three and nine month periods ending
September 30, 2008 and 2007, which includes the period following the initial public offering on
January 30, 2007, and for the period following the underwriters exercise of the overallotment
option on February 21, 2007 (dollars in thousands).
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Period |
|
Period |
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
|
1/1/07 |
|
1/31/07 |
|
2/22/07 |
|
months |
|
months |
|
months |
|
months |
|
|
through |
|
through |
|
through |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
|
1/30/07 |
|
2/21/07 |
|
3/31/07 |
|
3/31/07 |
|
6/30/07 |
|
9/30/07 |
|
9/30/07 |
|
|
|
Net income from operating partnerships |
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
|
$ |
5,206 |
|
|
$ |
8,811 |
|
|
$ |
20,814 |
|
|
$ |
15,925 |
|
|
$ |
45,550 |
|
Minority interest ownership percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.14 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
$ |
2,879 |
|
|
$ |
3,908 |
|
|
$ |
11,513 |
|
|
$ |
8,808 |
|
|
$ |
24,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Three |
|
Nine |
|
|
months |
|
months |
|
months |
|
months |
|
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
|
3/31/08 |
|
6/30/08 |
|
9/30/08 |
|
9/30/08 |
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income from operating
partnerships |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
$ |
5,265 |
|
|
$ |
2,413 |
|
|
$ |
7,501 |
|
Minority interest ownership percentage |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
$ |
2,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
|
$ |
4,149 |
|
|
|
|
17. Stockholders Equity
The Company is authorized to issue 175,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and one share of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Each share of Class A
common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters to be voted on by stockholders
generally. HFF Holdings has been issued one share of Class B common stock. Class B common stock has
no economic rights but entitles the holder to a number of votes equal to the total number of shares
of Class A common stock for which the partnership units that HFF Holdings holds in the Operating
Partnerships, as of the relevant record date for the HFF, Inc. stockholder action, are
exchangeable. Holders of Class A and Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on
all matters presented to our stockholders for their vote or approval. The Company has issued
16,446,480 shares and 16,445,000 shares of Class A common stock as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. The Company has issued one share of Class B common stock as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
18. Earnings Per Share
The Companys net income and weighted average shares outstanding for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net income |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
12,307 |
|
Net income available for Class A
common stockholders |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
|
|
14,467,032 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
|
|
14,467,032 |
|
Net income per share information is not applicable for reporting periods prior to January 31, 2007,
the date of the initial public offering. The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share
amounts for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are described and
presented below.
Basic Net Income per Share
Numerator net income attributable to Class A common stockholders for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, including 47,730 and 11,110 restricted stock units that
have vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of September 30, 2008 and September 30,
2007, respectively.
22
Diluted Net Income per Share
Numerator net income attributable to Class A common stockholders for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 as in the basic net income per share calculation
described above plus income allocated to minority interest holder upon assumed exercise of exchange
rights.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, including 47,730 and 11,110 restricted stock units that
have vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of September 30, 2008 and September 30,
2007, respectively, plus the dilutive effect of the unrestricted stock units, stock options, and
the issuance of Class A common stock upon exercise of the exchange right by HFF Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Basic Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Class A common
stockholders |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of Class A
common stock outstanding |
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
|
|
14,467,032 |
|
Basic net income per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Class A common
stockholders |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to minority interest
holder upon assumed exercise of exchange
right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares of
Class A common stock |
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
|
|
14,467,032 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest holder exchange right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
16,481,786 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,464,731 |
|
|
|
14,467,032 |
|
Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
19. Related Party Transactions
The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates of approximately $54,000, during the nine
month period ended September 30, 2008. The Company had a net receivable from affiliates of $1.3
million and $1.2 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company made payments of $1.2 million and
allocated expenses for services performed of $0.1 million on behalf of two affiliates. The Company
was reimbursed for transaction costs relating to the IPO transaction from its two affiliates of
approximately $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. In addition, the
Company recorded a payable to its two affiliates in the amount of $10.9 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 for net working capital adjustments, the release of a letter of
credit as a result of the IPO transaction, and tax distributions. Upon release of the letter of
credit, the
Company made a payment to an affiliate in the amount of $2.0 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The Company had a net payable to affiliates of $6.1 million at September 30,
2007.
23
As a result of the Companys initial public offering, the Company entered into a tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings that provides for the payment by the Company to HFF Holdings of 85% of
the amount of the cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the
Company actually realizes as a result of the increase in tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP
and HFF Securities and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from entering into the tax
receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company will retain the
remaining 15% of cash savings, if any, in income tax that it realizes. For purposes of the tax
receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the Companys actual
income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there
been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF Securities allocable to the
Company as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges and had the Company not entered into
the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement commenced upon consummation
of the offering and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or have expired.
During the three month period ended September 30, 2008, the Company made a payment of $5.3 million
to HFF Holdings representing the first payment under the tax receivable agreement. See Note 14 for
further information regarding the tax receivable agreement and Note 20 for the amount recorded in
relation to this agreement.
20. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is obligated, pursuant to its tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF
Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax
that the Company actually realizes as a result of the increases in tax basis under Section 754 and
as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company entering into the tax receivable
agreement and making payments under that agreement. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company
paid HFF Holdings $5.3 million, which represents 85% of the actual cash savings realized by the
Company in 2007. The Company has recorded $108.3 million for this obligation to HFF Holdings as a
liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2008.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion summarizes the financial position of HFF, Inc. and its subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2008, and the results of our operations for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2008, and should be read in conjunction with (i) the unaudited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
(ii) the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Overview
Our Business
We are a leading provider of commercial real estate and capital markets services to the U.S.
commercial real estate industry based on transaction volume and are one of the largest full-service
commercial real estate financial intermediaries in the country.
Substantially all of our revenues are in the form of capital markets services fees collected
from our clients, usually negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis. We also earn fees from
commercial loan servicing activities. We believe that our multiple product offerings, diverse
client mix, expertise in a wide range of property types and national platform create diversified
revenue stream. Furthermore, we believe our business mix, operational expertise and the
leveragability of our platform have enabled us, in the past, to achieve profit margins that are
among the highest of our public company peers.
We operate in one reportable segment, the commercial real estate financial intermediary
segment, and offer debt placement, investment sales, structured finance, equity placement,
investment banking and advisory services, note sales and note sale advisory services and commercial
loan servicing.
Our business has been and may continue to be significantly affected by factors outside of our
control, particularly including:
|
|
Economic and commercial real estate market downturns. Our business is dependent on
international and domestic economic conditions and the demand for commercial real estate and
related services in the markets in which we operate and a slow down, a significant downturn
and/or a recession in either the global economy and/or the domestic economy, including but not
limited to even a regional economic downturn could adversely affect our business. A general
decline in acquisition and disposition activity can lead to a reduction in fees and
commissions for arranging such transactions, as well as in fees and commissions for arranging
financing for acquirers and property owners that are seeking to recapitalize their existing
properties. Likewise, a general decline in commercial real estate investment activity can lead
to a reduction in fees and commissions for arranging acquisitions, dispositions and financings
for acquisitions as well as for recapitalizations for existing property owners as well as a
significant reduction in our loan servicing activities, due to increased delinquencies and
defaults and lack of additional loans that we would have otherwise added to our loan servicing
portfolio, all of which would have an adverse effect on our business. |
|
|
|
Global and domestic credit and liquidity issues. Global and domestic credit and liquidity
issues have lead to and are expected to continue to lead to a decrease in transaction activity
and lower values. The current situation in the global credit markets whereby many world
governments (including but not limited to the U.S. where the Company transacts virtually all
of its business) have had to take unprecedented and uncharted steps to support the financial
institutions in their respective countries from collapse is unprecedented in the Companys
history. Restrictions on the availability of capital, both debt and/or equity, have created
significant reductions and could further reduce the liquidity in and flow of capital to the
commercial real estate markets, as is currently the case. These restrictions could also cause
commercial real estate prices to decrease due to the reduced amount of equity capital and debt
financing available, as is currently the case. In particular, global and domestic credit and
liquidity issues may reduce the number of acquisitions, dispositions and loan originations, as
well as the respective number of transactions and transaction volumes, which could also
adversely affect our capital markets services revenues including our servicing revenue, as is
currently the case. |
|
|
|
Decreased investment allocation to commercial real estate class. Allocations to commercial
real estate as an asset class for investment portfolio diversification may decrease for a
number of reasons beyond our control, including but not limited to poor performance of the
asset class relative to other asset classes, superior performance of other asset classes when
compared with continued good performance of the commercial real |
25
|
|
estate asset class or when allocations must be reduced due to the overall poor performance of an
investors portfolio causing the allocations to commercial real estate to exceed the target
allocation. In addition, while commercial real estate had been recently viewed as an accepted
and valid class for portfolio diversification, if this perception changes, which may be the case
today, there could be a significant reduction in the amount of debt and equity capital available
in the commercial real estate sector. |
|
|
|
Fluctuations in interest rates. Significant fluctuations in interest rates as well as steady
and protracted movements of interest rates in one direction (increases or decreases) could
adversely affect the operation and income of commercial real estate properties as well as the
demand from investors for commercial real estate investments. Both of these events could
adversely affect investor demand and the supply of capital for debt and equity investments in
commercial real estate. In particular, increased interest rates may cause prices to decrease
due to the increased costs of obtaining financing and could lead to decreases in purchase and
sale activities thereby reducing the amounts of investment sales and loan originations and
related servicing fees. If our investment sales origination and servicing businesses are
negatively impacted, it is likely that our other lines of business would also suffer due to
the relationship among our various capital markets services. |
|
|
|
The factors discussed above continue to be a risk to our business as evidenced by the recent
significant disruptions in the global capital and credit markets, especially in the domestic
capital markets. In particular, the liquidity issues in the capital markets have adversely
affected our business and could continue to adversely affect our business. The significant
balance sheet issues of many of the CMBS lenders, banks, life insurance companies, captive
finance companies and other financial institutions have, and may likely continue to, adversely
affect the flow of commercial mortgage debt and equity to the U.S. capital markets as well and
can potentially adversely affect all of our capital markets services platforms and resulting
revenues. |
|
|
|
The economic slow down, as well as deflation, and possible recession globally, and especially in
the United States also continues to be a risk, not only due to the current and potential
negative adverse impacts on the performance of U.S. commercial real estate markets, but also to
the ability of lenders and equity investors to generate significant funds to continue to make
loans and equity available to the U.S. commercial real estate market. |
Other factors that may adversely affect our business are discussed under the heading
Forward-Looking Statements and under the caption Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
26
Results of Operations
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and September 30, 2007. The table included in the period comparisons below provides
summaries of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are
not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Dollars |
|
Revenue |
|
Dollars |
|
Revenue |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
29,441 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
% |
|
$ |
66,463 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
% |
|
$ |
(37,022 |
) |
|
|
(55.7 |
)% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
183.7 |
% |
Other |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
31,034 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
68,029 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(36,995 |
) |
|
|
(54.4 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
20,014 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
39,166 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
% |
|
|
(19,152 |
) |
|
|
(48.9 |
)% |
Personnel |
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
(2,445 |
) |
|
|
(53.1 |
)% |
Occupancy |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
)% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
|
(42.6 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
31,132 |
|
|
|
100.3 |
% |
|
|
54,429 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
(23,297 |
) |
|
|
(42.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
Operating (loss) / income |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
(13,698 |
) |
|
|
(100.7 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Decrease in payable under tax
receivable agreement |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority
interest |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
15,766 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
(13,737 |
) |
|
|
(87.1 |
)% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
(2,578 |
) |
|
|
(87.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
12,819 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
(11,159 |
) |
|
|
(87.1 |
)% |
Minority interest |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
8,808 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
(7,473 |
) |
|
|
(84.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(3,686 |
) |
|
|
(91.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
Revenues. Our total revenues were $31.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008
compared to $68.0 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $37.0 million, or 54.4%.
Revenues decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in production volumes in several of our
capital markets services platforms brought about, in significant part, by a slowing economy, both
globally and domestically as well as from the unprecedented disruptions in the global and domestic
capital and credit markets.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the three months ended September
30, 2008 decreased $37.0 million, or 55.7%, to $29.4 million from $66.5 million for the same
period in 2007. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in both the number and
the average dollar value of transactions closed during the third quarter of 2008 compared to
the third quarter of 2007. |
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $0.7 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $0.5 million. Revenues increased primarily as a result of increased volume of
Freddie Mac loans in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the third quarter of 2007. |
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which include expense reimbursements from clients related to
out of pocket costs incurred, were approximately $0.9 million for the three month period ended
September 30, 2008 and $1.3 million for the three month period ending September 30, 2007. The
decrease is primarily due to the decrease in the number of transactions closed during the
third quarter 2008 compared to the third quarter of 2007. |
27
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $31.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $54.4 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $23.3
million, or 42.8%. Expenses decreased primarily due to lower cost of services, personnel and
supplies, research and printing costs as a result of the reduction in capital markets services
revenue.
|
|
The costs of services for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $19.2 million,
or 48.9%, to $20.0 million from $39.2 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease is
primarily the result of the decrease in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the decrease in capital markets services revenues. Cost of services as a percentage
of capital markets services and other revenues were approximately 66.0% and 57.8% for the
three month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively. This
percentage increase is primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost of services, such
as salaries for our analysts and fringe benefit costs being spread over a lower revenue base. |
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $2.4 million, or 53.1%, to $2.2
million from $4.6 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily related to a
decrease in profit participation expense resulting from the lower operating income during the
three months ended September 30, 2008. |
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $1.4 million, or 23.5%, to $4.4 million
compared to the same period in 2007. These decreases are primarily due to decreased supplies,
research and printing expenses stemming from the decrease in capital markets services
revenues. |
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were $4.5
million in the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 7.0%,
versus $4.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease is primarily
related to decreased professional fees, other taxes and gain on sale of assets in the total
amount of $0.8 million. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in production
interest expense of $0.3 million. |
Net Income. Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $0.3 million, a
decrease of $3.7 million versus income of $4.0 million for the same fiscal period in 2007. We
attribute this decrease to several factors, with the most significant cause being the reduction in
revenues of $37.0 million. Factors slightly offsetting this decrease included:
|
|
The decrease in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $282,000 reflects the decrease in the estimated tax benefits owed to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable agreement. This
decrease in tax benefits owed to HFF Holdings represents 85% of the decrease in the related deferred tax asset of $333,000. |
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a current income tax
expense of $0.7 million and deferred income tax benefit of $0.3 million as compared to current
income tax expense of $1.1 million and deferred income tax expense of $1.8 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2007. |
28
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and September 30, 2007. The table included in the period comparisons below provides summaries
of our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not
necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Dollars |
|
Revenue |
|
Dollars |
|
Revenue |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
103,003 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
$ |
199,565 |
|
|
|
98.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(96,562 |
) |
|
|
(48.4 |
)% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
106,803 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
203,360 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(96,557 |
) |
|
|
(47.5 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
69,365 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
% |
|
|
116,854 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
% |
|
|
(47,489 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
)% |
Personnel |
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
14,307 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
(7,289 |
) |
|
|
(50.9 |
)% |
Occupancy |
|
|
5,689 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
6,012 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4,635 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
6,703 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
(862 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
12,245 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
14,156 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
105,013 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
% |
|
|
162,667 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
(57,654 |
) |
|
|
(35.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
40,693 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
(38,903 |
) |
|
|
(95.6 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(96.3 |
)% |
Decrease in payable under the tax
receivable agreement |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority
interest |
|
|
9,412 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
44,375 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
(34,963 |
) |
|
|
(78.8 |
)% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(3,006 |
) |
|
|
(38.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
36,536 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
(31,957 |
) |
|
|
(87.5 |
)% |
Minority interest |
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
24,229 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
(20,080 |
) |
|
|
(82.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
$ |
12,307 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(11,877 |
) |
|
|
(96.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
Revenues. Our total revenues were $106.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
compared to $203.4 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $96.6 million, or 47.5%.
Revenues decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in production volumes in several of our
capital markets services platforms attributable to, in significant part, by a slowing economy, both
globally and domestically as well as from the unprecedented disruptions in the global and domestic
capital and credit markets.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 decreased $96.6 million, or 48.4%, to $103.0 million from $199.6 million for the same
period in 2007. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in both the number and
the average dollar value of transactions closed during the first nine months of 2008 compared
to the first nine months of 2007. |
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $1.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.1 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $0.3 million. Revenues increased primarily as a result of increased volume of
Freddie Mac loans in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the first nine months of 2007. |
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which include expense reimbursements from clients related to
out of pocket costs incurred, were approximately $2.4 million for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2008 and $2.7 million for the nine month period ending September 30, 2007. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $105.0 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $162.7 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of
$57.7 million, or 35.4%. Expenses decreased primarily due to lower cost of services and personnel
costs as a result of the reduction in capital markets services revenue, and decreased professional
fees and supplies, research and printing costs.
29
|
|
The costs of services for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $47.5 million,
or 40.6%, to $69.4 million from $116.9 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease is
primarily the result of the decrease in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the decrease in capital markets services revenues. Cost of services as a percentage
of capital markets services and other revenues were approximately 65.8% and 57.8% for the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively. This percentage
increase is primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost of services, such as salaries
for our analysts and fringe benefit costs, being spread over a lower revenue base. |
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $7.3 million, or 50.9%, to $7.0 million
from $14.3 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily related to a
decrease in profit participation expense resulting from the lower operating income during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was slightly offset by increased salaries
of $0.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period
in the prior year. |
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were
$12.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $1.9 million, or
13.5%, versus $14.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease is
primarily related to decreases in professional fees and marketing expenses. The Company
experienced higher professional fees of approximately $0.9 million during the nine month
period ended September 30, 2007 primarily as a consequence of fees related to the Companys
initial public offering that were incurred during this period. Marketing expenses decreased
$0.8 million due to a decrease in corporate and local advertising and corporate-sponsored
events . |
Net Income. Our net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $0.4 million, a
decrease of $11.9 million versus net income of $12.3 million for the same fiscal period in
2007. We attribute this decrease to several factors, with the most significant cause being a
decrease of revenues of $96.6 million related to current year market conditions and the
resulting lower operating income. Factors slightly offsetting this decrease included:
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $15,000,
compared to $0.4 million of similar expenses incurred in the nine months ended September 30,
2007. This decrease resulted from interest expense in the amount of $0.4 million on a Credit
Agreement with Bank of America in the three months ended March 31, 2007. The outstanding
balance of $56.3 million under this Credit Agreement was paid off with the proceeds from the
initial public offering and we contemporaneously entered into an Amended Credit Agreement with
Bank of America providing for our current $40.0 million line of credit. |
|
|
The decrease in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $3.9 million reflects
the decrease in the estimated tax benefits owed to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable agreement.
This decrease in tax benefits owed to HFF Holdings represents 85% of the decrease in the related
deferred tax asset of $4.6 million. |
|
|
Income tax expense was approximately $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of $3.0 million from $7.8 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2007. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in net operating income experienced
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a current income tax
benefit of $2.7 million which was offset by deferred income tax expense of $7.5 million,
primarily relating to the amortization of the step-up in basis from the Section 754 election
and a change in the rates used to measure the deferred tax assets. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded current income tax expense of $3.3 million and
deferred income tax expense of $4.5 million. |
30
Financial Condition
Total assets increased to $289.5 million at September 30, 2008, from $240.5 million at
December 31, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
An increase in prepaids and other assets of $4.6 million primarily the result of the
recording of a current income tax benefit of $2.7 million during the nine months ending
September 30, 2008 and payment of annual insurance premiums. |
|
|
An increase in mortgage notes receivable of $59.3 million due to a higher number of loans
pending sale to Freddie Mac at September 30, 2008, compared to December 31, 2007. |
These increases were partially offset by a $7.5 million decrease in the deferred tax asset
primarily as a result of the amortization of the step-up in basis from the section 754 election.
Total liabilities increased $43.8 million at September 30, 2008, from $180.6 million at
December 31, 2007, primarily due to an increase in the warehouse line of credit of $59.3 million
due to a higher balance of loans pending sale to Freddie Mac at September 30, 2008, compared to
December 31, 2007.
This increase was partially offset by the following:
|
|
A decrease in accrued compensation and related taxes of $4.6 million due to payment of year
end bonus accruals and a lower profit participation accrual at September 30, 2008 as compared
to September 30, 2007. |
|
|
A decrease in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $3.9 million representing
85% of the decrease in our deferred tax assets which decreased due to a change in the tax rate
used to measure our deferred tax assets. Also, in conjunction with the filing of the
Companys 2007 federal and state tax returns, the benefit for 2007 relating to the Section 754
basis step-up was finalized resulting in $6.2 million in tax benefits in 2007. As such,
during August 2008, the Company paid $5.3 million to HFF Holdings under this tax receivable
agreement. |
Cash Flows
Our historical cash flows are primarily related to the timing of receipt of transaction fees,
the timing of distributions to members of HFF Holdings and payment of commissions and bonuses to
employees.
2008
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $17.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net cash of $6.7 million was used in operating activities, primarily resulting from a $4.6 million
increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and a $4.6 million decrease in accrued
compensation and related taxes. These uses of cash were partially offset by the decrease in
deferred taxes of $7.5 million. Cash of $9.9 million was used to purchase a six month United
States Treasury Note and $0.3 million was used for investing in property and equipment and entering
into a non-compete agreement. Financing activities used $0.1 million of cash for the payments on
certain capital leases and distributions to HFF Holdings, the minority interest holder.
2007
Cash and cash equivalents increased $56.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Net cash of $68.0 million was provided by operating activities, primarily resulting from an
increase in accrued compensation and related taxes of $16.6 million and net income (including
minority interest) of $36.5 million. Cash of $4.3 million was used for investing in property and
equipment. Financing activities used $7.5 million of cash primarily due to the payoff of the credit
facility in the amount of $56.3 million, the purchase of partnership interests in HFF LP and HFF
Securities and shares of Holliday GP and distributions to HFF Holdings and its members. This
decrease in cash was partially offset by the proceeds from the issuance of our Class A common stock
of $272.1 million.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our current assets typically have consisted primarily of cash and accounts receivable in
relation to earned transaction fees. Our liabilities have typically consisted of accounts payable
and accrued compensation.
Over the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, we used approximately $6.7 million of
cash from operations. Our short-term liquidity needs are typically related to compensation expenses
and other operating expenses such as occupancy, supplies, marketing, professional fees and travel
and entertainment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we incurred approximately $105.0
million in total operating expenses. A large portion of our operating expenses are variable, highly
correlated to our revenue streams and dependent on the collection of transaction fees. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 46.8% of our operating expenses were variable
expenses. In addition, our tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings entered into in connection
with our initial public offering, provides for the payment by us to HFF Holdings of 85% of the
amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income taxes that we actually
realize as a result of the increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits
arising from our entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that
agreement. We have estimated that the payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $108.3
million. Our liquidity needs related to our long term obligations are primarily related to our
facility leases and payments under the tax receivable agreement. In connection with our initial
public offering, we paid off the entire balance of our credit facility of $56.3 million and entered
into a new credit facility that provides us with a $40.0 million line of credit, as described
below. We currently believe that cash flows from operating activities, availability under our line
of credit and our existing cash balance will provide adequate liquidity and are sufficient to meet
our working capital needs and satisfy our long-term obligations. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, we incurred approximately $5.7 million in occupancy expenses and approximately
$15,000 in interest expense.
Our cash flow generated from operations historically has been sufficient to enable us to meet
our objectives. Assuming we can generate similar revenues and operating income going forward, we believe
that cash flows from operating activities will be sufficient for us to fund our current obligations
for the foreseeable future. In addition, we intend to continue to maintain lines of credit that can
be utilized to support our activities should the need arise. In the course of the past several
years, we have entered into financing arrangements designed to support our liquidity. Our current
principal financing arrangements are described below.
We entered into an Amended Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. for a new $40.0 million
line of credit that was put in place contemporaneously with the consummation of the initial public
offering. This new credit facility matures on February 5, 2010 and may be extended for one year
based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. Interest on outstanding balance is payable
at the applicable LIBOR rate (for interest periods of one, two, three, six or twelve months) plus
200 basis points, 175 basis points or 150 basis points (such rate is determined from time to time
in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, based on our then applicable consolidated leverage
ratio) or at interest equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate (2.03% at September 30,
2008) plus 0.5% and (b) the Prime Rate (5.0% at September 30, 2008) plus 1.5%. The Amended Credit
Agreement also requires payment of a commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3% on the unused amount of credit
based on the total amount outstanding. Additionally, on June 27,
2008, we entered into an
amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to modify the calculation of the Consolidated Fixed
Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined therein, as it relates to the Quarterly Tax Distributions, as
defined therein, and to modify certain annual and quarterly reporting obligations of HFF LP under
the Amended Credit Agreement. We did not borrow on this revolving credit facility during
the nine month period ended September 30, 2008. On October 29, 2008, Bank of America announced
plans that they would participate in the U.S. governments Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). As
of this time, we are unable to determine what impact, if any, this
may have on our
ability to utilize its line of credit under the Amended Credit Agreement.
In 2005, we entered into a financing arrangement with Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. to fund our
Freddie Mac loan closings. Pursuant to this arrangement, Red Mortgage Capital funds multifamily
Freddie Mac loan closings on a transaction-by-transaction basis, with each loan being separately
collateralized by a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by
Freddie Mac. On October 24, 2008, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., announced its intention to
acquire National City Corporation, which is the parent company of Red Mortgage Capital, and to
participate in the TARP. As of this time we are unable to determine what impact, if any, this
transaction may have on the Companys ability to continue obtain financing from Red Mortgage
Capital to support our Freddie Mac business.
32
In October 2007, as a result of increases in the volume of the Freddie Mac loans that HFF LP
originated as part of its participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program and
recently imposed borrowing limits under the financing arrangement with Red Capital of $150.0
million, we began pursuing alternative financing arrangements to potentially supplement or replace
our existing financing arrangement with Red Mortgage Capital. On October 30, 2007, we entered into
an amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to clarify that the $40.0 million line of credit under
the Amended Credit Agreement is available to us for purposes of originating such Freddie Mac loans.
We did not borrow under the Amended Credit Agreement in connection with funding the Freddie Mac
mortgage loans that we originated or otherwise during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. In
addition, in November 2007, we obtained a $50.0 million financing arrangement from The Huntington
National Bank to supplement our Red Mortgage Capital financing arrangement. As of September 30,
2008, we had outstanding borrowings of $100.3 million under the Red Mortgage Capital/Huntington
National Bank arrangement and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes receivable. We believe that
our current financing arrangements with Red Mortgage Capital and The Huntington Bank and our lines
of credit under the Amended Credit Agreement are sufficient to meet our current needs in connection
with our participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program. In the event we are
not able to secure financing for our Freddie Mac loan closings, however, we will cease originating
such Freddie Mac loans until we have available financing.
We regularly monitor our liquidity position, including cash levels, credit lines, interest and
payments on debt, capital expenditures and matters relating to liquidity and to compliance with
regulatory net capital requirements. We maintain a line of credit under the Amended Credit
Agreement in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements. As of September 30, 2008, based on our
Availability, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement as three times the difference of
Consolidated EBITDA, as defined therein, and Consolidated Fixed Charges, as defined therein, we
have $30.0 million of the $40.0 million in undrawn line of credit available to us under
this facility. This facility provides us with the ability to meet short-term cash flow needs
resulting from our various business activities. If this facility proves to be insufficient or
unavailable to us, we would seek additional financing in the credit or capital markets, although we
may be unsuccessful in obtaining such additional financing on acceptable terms or at all especially
in light of the issues in the global and domestic capital markets.
Certain Information Concerning Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently invest in any off-balance sheet vehicles that provide liquidity, capital
resources, market or credit risk support, or engage in any leasing activities that expose us to any
liability that is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality
Our capital markets services revenue is typically seasonal, which can affect an investors
ability to compare our financial condition and results of operation on a quarter-by-quarter basis.
Historically, this seasonality has caused our revenue, operating income, net income and cash flows
from operating activities to be lower in the first six months of the year and higher in the second
half of the year. The typical concentration of earnings and cash flows in the last six months of
the year is due to an industry-wide focus of clients to complete transactions towards the end of
the calendar year. As this typical seasonality is coupled with the current unprecedented
disruptions in the global and domestic capital markets and the liquidity issues facing all capital
markets, especially the U.S. commercial real estate markets, there is a risk that future historical
comparisons will be even more difficult to gauge.
Effect of Inflation and/or Deflation
Inflation and/or deflation, especially inflation, could significantly affect our compensation
costs, particularly those not directly tied to our transaction professionals compensation, due to
factors such as increased costs of capital. The rise of inflation could also significantly and
adversely affect certain expenses, such as debt service costs, information technology and occupancy
costs. To the extent that inflation results in rising interest rates and deflation causes
significant negative valuation issues and/or either other effects upon the commercial real estate
markets in which we operate and, to a lesser extent, the securities markets, it may affect our
financial position and results of operations by reducing the demand for commercial real estate and
related services which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. See Part II
Other Information Item 1A Risk Factors.
33
Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates
and/or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in
our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience
and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions,
estimates and/or judgments, however, are often subjective and they and our actual results may
change negatively based on changing circumstances or changes in our analyses. If actual amounts are
ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations
for the period in which the actual amounts become known. We believe the following critical
accounting policies could potentially produce materially different results if we were to change
underlying assumptions, estimates and/or judgments. See the notes to our consolidated financial
statements for a summary of our significant accounting policies.
Goodwill. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we evaluate goodwill for potential impairment annually or
more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. In this process, we make
estimates and assumptions in order to determine the fair value of the Company. In determining the
fair value of the Company for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment, we utilize an
enterprise market capitalization approach. In applying this approach, we use the closing stock
price of our Class A common stock as of the measurement date multiplied by the sum of current
outstanding shares plus the exchangeable shares as of the measurement date. As of October 31, 2008,
managements analysis indicates that an approximate 30% decline in the Companys stock price may
result in the recorded goodwill being impaired and would require management to measure the amount
of the impairment charge. Goodwill is considered impaired if the recorded book value of goodwill
exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill as determined under this valuation technique. We use our
best judgment and information available to us at the time to perform this review. Because our
assumptions and estimates are used in projecting future earnings as part of the valuation, actual
results could differ.
Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets primarily include mortgage servicing rights under
agreements with third party lenders. Servicing rights are recorded at the lower of cost or market.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The cost of servicing and discount rates
are the most sensitive factors affecting the estimated fair value of the servicing rights.
Management estimates a market participants cost of servicing by analyzing the limited market
activity and considering the Companys own internal servicing costs. Management estimates the
discount rate by considering the various risks involved in the future cash flows of the underlying
loans which include the cancellation of servicing contracts, concentration in the life company
portfolio and the incremental risk related to large loans. Management estimates the prepayment
levels of the underlying mortgages by analyzing recent historical experience. Many of the
commercial loans being serviced have financial penalties for prepayment or early payoff before the
stated maturity date. As a result, the Company has consistently experienced a low level of loan
runoff. The estimated value of the servicing rights is impacted by changes in these assumptions. As
of September 30, 2008, the fair value and net book value of the servicing rights were $7.9 million
and $6.8 million, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in the level of assumed prepayments
would decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 1.7%,
3.4% and 5.0%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in cost of servicing of the servicing
business would decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up
to 22.1%, 44.3% and 66.4%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in the discount rate would
decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 3.5%, 6.8%
and 9.8%, respectively. The effect of a variation in each of these assumptions on the estimated
fair value of the servicing rights is calculated independently without changing any other
assumption. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated
servicing income which results in an accelerated level of amortization over eight years. We
evaluate amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances so
indicate, for potential impairment.
34
Leases. The Company leases all of its facilities under operating lease agreements. These lease
agreements typically contain tenant improvement allowances. The Company records tenant improvement
allowances as a leasehold improvement asset, included in property and equipment, net in the
consolidated balance sheet, and a related deferred rent liability and amortizes them on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease or useful life of the asset as
additional depreciation expense and a reduction to rent expense, respectively. Lease agreements
sometimes contain rent escalation clauses or rent holidays, which are recognized on a straight-line
basis over the life of the lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. Lease terms
generally range from one to ten years. An analysis is performed on all equipment leases to
determine whether they should be classified as a capital or an operating lease according to SFAS
No. 13, as amended.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 will change the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method will significantly change the
accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. The provisions of this standard are
effective beginning January 1, 2009. Prior to adoption, the Company will evaluate the impact on its
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This new standard is
designed to reduce complexity in accounting for financial instruments and lessen earnings
volatility caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The standard creates
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to aid comparisons between companies that use
different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The standard, which
is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses on
those assets and liabilities recorded in earnings. The fair value option may be applied on a
financial instrument by financial instrument basis, with a few exceptions, and is irrevocable for
those financial instruments once applied. The fair value option may only be applied to entire
financial instruments, not portions of instruments. The standard does not eliminate disclosures
required by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, or SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, the latter of which is described below. The provisions of the standard
were effective for consolidated financial statements beginning January 1, 2008. The Company did not
elect the fair value option upon adoption of SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). This new
standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in conformity with
GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Prior to this standard, there were
varying definitions of fair value, and the limited guidance for applying those definitions under
GAAP was dispersed among the many accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements.
The new standard defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The provisions of SFAS 157 were adopted on January 1, 2008, and did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, since the FASB previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair
value is the relevant measurement attribute. As a result, the new standard does not establish any
new fair value measurements itself, but applies to other accounting standards that require the use
of fair value for recognition or disclosure. In particular, the framework in the new standard will
be required for financial instruments for which fair value is elected.
The new standard requires companies to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments
according to a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of
the information used to determine fair values. Financial instruments carried at fair value will be
classified and disclosed in one of the three categories in accordance with the hierarchy. The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
|
|
|
level 1: Quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
35
|
|
|
level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs corroborated by market
data; and |
|
|
|
|
level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. |
In addition, the standard requires enhanced disclosure with respect to the activities of those
financial instruments classified within the level 3 category, including a roll-forward analysis of
fair value balance sheet amounts for each major category of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of the unrealized gains and losses for level 3 positions held at the reporting date.
The standard is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements
and disclosures about fair value measurements, and encourages entities to combine the fair value
information disclosed under the standard with the fair value information disclosed under other
accounting pronouncements, including SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, where practicable. The provisions of this standard were effective beginning January 1,
2008.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2 Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP FAS 157-2) which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities including, but not limited to,
nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination that
are not subsequently remeasured at fair value and nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at
fair value in the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment test. As a result of the issuance of FSP FAS 157-2,
the Company did not apply the provisions of SFAS 157 to the nonfinancial assets and liabilities
within the scope of FSP FAS 157-2.
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS 157-3), which clarifies the
application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key
considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that
financial asset is not active. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 had no impact on the Financial
Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Due to the nature of our business and the manner in which we conduct our operations, in
particular that our financial instruments which are exposed to concentrations of credit risk
consist primarily of short-term cash investments and in light of the recent support provided by the
U.S. government related to the current credit and liquidity issues, we believe we do not face any
material interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, equity price risk or other market
risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, respectively) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of September 30, 2008, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules and
forms.
36
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
objectives under all future events, no
matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may not
deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures may not
prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures
can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three month period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving normal ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to our business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and
financial liability with respect to such pending matters. However, we believe, based on our
examination of such pending matters, that our ultimate liability for such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
38
Item 6. Exhibits.
A. Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HFF, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
November 10, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ John H. Pelusi, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John H. Pelusi, Jr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Director and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Managing Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
November 10, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Gregory R. Conley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory R. Conley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
41