Standard Register Company DEF 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
The Standard Register Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ |
No fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of
transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
P.O. Box 1167
l Dayton, OH 45401
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
OF THE STANDARD REGISTER
COMPANY
To All Shareholders:
The annual meeting of shareholders of The Standard Register
Company, an Ohio corporation, will be held at our corporate
headquarters located at 600 Albany Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408,
on Thursday, April 27, 2006, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern
Daylight Savings Time, for the following purposes:
(1) To set the number of directors at eight and to elect a
board of directors;
(2) To transact such other business as may properly come
before the annual meeting.
The board of directors has fixed the close of business on
February 27, 2006, as the record date for determining the
shareholders of Standard Register entitled to vote at the annual
meeting.
A copy of Standard Registers annual report for its fiscal
year ended January 1, 2006, is enclosed. Although it is not
a part of the official proxy soliciting material, we want each
shareholder to have a copy of the annual report. If you have not
received a copy of the annual report, please call us at
937.221.1506.
|
|
|
Kathryn A. Lamme |
|
Vice President, General Counsel |
|
& Secretary |
Dayton, Ohio
March 21, 2006
|
|
|
|
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT AT THE ANNUAL
MEETING, YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES
AS DESCRIBED ON YOUR PROXY CARD. |
|
THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING
OF
SHAREHOLDERS
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES:
600 Albany Street
Dayton, Ohio 45408
(937) 221-1000
Mailing Date: March 21, 2006
|
|
|
|
We are mailing this proxy statement along with the notice of
annual meeting of shareholders of The Standard Register Company,
to all holders of our stock as of February 27, 2006, which
is the record date for the annual meeting. We had outstanding,
on the record date, 24,111,494 shares of common stock (each
share having one vote) and 4,725,000 shares of class A
stock (each share having five votes). Shareholders as of the
close of business on the record date are entitled to receive
notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. The annual meeting
will be held at our corporate headquarters, 600 Albany Street,
Dayton, Ohio 45408, on Thursday, April 27, 2006, at
11:00 a.m. The proxies are solicited on behalf of our board
of directors. |
|
At the annual meeting, the shareholders will: (1) set the
number of directors at eight and elect a board of directors; and
(2) transact such other business as may properly come
before the annual meeting.
VOTING YOUR SHARES
Standard Register offers electronic delivery of proxy materials
and voting over the Internet to most shareholders. The enclosed
proxy card describes how you may vote electronically, and
register to receive future shareholder communications
electronically. You may also vote by completing the proxy card
and mailing it in the envelope provided.
All shareholder votes, properly cast in person or by proxy, and
not revoked, will be counted in voting on the proposals at the
annual meeting or any adjournment of the annual meeting. Your
proxy will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you
do not specify how you wish your shares to be voted, they will
be voted as recommended by the board of directors. Your proxy
includes the authority to vote shares cumulatively for the
election of directors. Cumulative voting is explained in the
section dealing with Proposal 1. Your proxy also includes
the authority for the persons serving as proxies to use their
best judgment to vote on any other matters that may be properly
presented at the annual meeting, including, among other things,
a motion to adjourn the meeting to a future time.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before its exercise, in
two ways: (1) by timely delivery to us of a later-dated
proxy, or (2) by notifying us of your revocation of proxy
either in writing or in person at the annual meeting. Your
presence at the meeting will not, by itself, serve to revoke
your proxy.
PROPOSALS
PROPOSAL 1: Election of Directors
The board of directors is currently set at eight, and the board
recommends maintaining that number of directors.
The eight persons named in this section are nominated by the
board of directors to be elected as directors and to serve until
either the next annual election or until their successors are
elected and qualified.
The board of directors does not expect that any of the nominees
will be unavailable for election. However, if any of them is
unavailable, the persons voting your proxy will use their best
judgment to vote for substitute nominees.
Cumulative voting is permitted by the laws of Ohio in voting for
the election of directors. In the event a shareholder wishes to
vote his or her shares cumulatively, the shareholder must give
notice in writing to the President, a Vice President or
Secretary of Standard Register not less than 48 hours before the
time scheduled for the annual meeting. Once any shareholder has
given notice of intent to vote cumulatively, then all
shareholders present at the annual meeting and the persons
voting the proxies shall have full discretion and authority to
cumulate the voting power they possess. This means they can give
one candidate as many votes as the number of directors to be
elected multiplied by the number of votes which the shareholder
or proxy is entitled to cast, or to distribute such votes on the
same principle among two or more candidates, as they determine
in their judgment.
Nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast for the
positions to be filled will be elected. Abstentions and shares
not voted by brokers and other entities holding shares on behalf
of beneficial owners will not be counted and will have no effect
on the outcome of the election.
The board of directors recommends that you vote FOR setting
the number of directors at eight and FOR each of the following
named nominees to serve as directors of Standard Register:
Nominees
All nominees recommended by the board of directors for election
were previously elected as directors by the shareholders.
Information concerning each nominee follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served As |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
|
|
|
|
|
Roy W. Begley, Jr.*
|
|
50 |
|
1994 |
Since March 2003,
Mr. Begley has been Senior Vice President and Investment
Officer with McDonald Financial Group, formerly known as Victory
Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of KeyCorp.
From July 1999 to March 2003, he served as Vice President and
Investment Officer with McDonald Financial Group. From September
1995 to July 1999, he was Assistant Vice President and
Investment Officer with Key Trust Co. of Ohio, N.A. He is
Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
and a member of the Compensation Committee of the board of
directors.
|
F. David Clarke, III
|
|
49 |
|
1992 |
Mr. Clarke has been
Chairman of the board of directors of Clarke-Hook Corporation
since December 1990. He is Chairman of the Compensation
Committee and a member of the Audit and Executive Committees of
the board of directors.
|
Paul H. Granzow
|
|
78 |
|
1966 |
Mr. Granzow has been
Chairman of the board of directors of Standard Register since
January 1984. He is a co-trustee of the John Q. Sherman Trusts.
See the section dealing with Voting Securities and
Principal Holders. He is also Chairman of the Executive
Committee of the board of directors.
|
Sherrill W. Hudson
|
|
62 |
|
2002 |
Mr. Hudson has been
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TECO Energy, Inc., an
integrated energy provider, since July 2004. He retired from
Deloitte & Touche, LLP, in August 2002, after
37 years of service. The last 19 years with Deloitte
were spent in Miami, Florida, as Managing Partner for South
Florida, which included oversight responsibility for
Deloittes Florida and Puerto Rico offices for most of that
time. Mr. Hudson is a director of TECO Energy, Inc., Publix
Super Markets, Inc., and A. Duda & Sons, Inc. He is
Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation
Committee of the board of directors.
|
Dennis L. Rediker
|
|
62 |
|
1995 |
Mr. Rediker has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of Standard Register since
June 2000. From May 1999 to April 2000, he was Chief Executive
Officer of the Imerys Pigments and Additives Operating Group.
From 1996 until 1999, he was Chief Executive Officer and
director of English China Clays, plc. Mr. Rediker has
served as a director of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., since
September 2003, and currently serves on their Finance and
Ethics, and Health and Safety Committees. Mr. Rediker is a
member of Standard Registers Executive Committee.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served As |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
|
|
|
|
|
Ann Scavullo
|
|
59 |
|
1996 |
Ms. Scavullo has been a
principal in Churchill Investor Services since January 1999. She
was formerly an executive at Avon Products, Inc., serving as
Vice President of Strategic Alliances and Joint Ventures from
1995 until 1999, and Vice President of Investor Relations from
1991 until 1995. She is a member of the Audit, Compensation and
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees of the board of
directors.
|
John J. Schiff,
Jr.
|
|
62 |
|
1982 |
Mr. Schiff has been
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Cincinnati Insurance
Company and Cincinnati Financial Corporation since 1999. From
1998 until 1999, he was Chairman of the board of directors and
Chief Operating Officer of The Cincinnati Insurance Company and
Cincinnati Financial Corporation. He is a director of The
Cinergy Corp., Fifth Third Bancorp, The Fifth Third Bank,
Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., and John J. and Thomas R.
Schiff & Co., Inc., an insurance agency. He is a member
of the Audit Committee of the board of directors.
|
John Q. Sherman,
II*
|
|
52 |
|
1994 |
Mr. Sherman has been a
manufacturers representative for A. Rifkin Company,
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, since 1985. A. Rifkin Company is a
manufacturer of specialty security packaging. He is a member of
the Compensation and the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committees of the board of directors, and is the Presiding
Director of meetings of non-management directors.
|
|
|
* |
Roy W. Begley, Jr., and John Q. Sherman, II, are first cousins. |
The board of directors met six times in 2005. All directors
attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the board of
directors and of the committees on which they served.
The Executive Committee has the authority to act on behalf of
the board of directors during the time between meetings, in all
matters except for filling vacancies on the board of directors
or any of its committees. The Executive Committee did not meet
in 2005. Mr. Granzow is Chairman of the Executive Committee
and Messrs. Clarke and Rediker are the other members.
Other board committees, Audit, Compensation and Corporate
Governance and Nominating, are described in their respective
reports appearing in later sections of this proxy statement.
Board of Directors Compensation
Members of the board of directors who are not Standard Register
officers receive an annual fee of $25,000 for serving on the
board of directors, and $1,000 for each board of directors
meeting attended.
Members of the Compensation and Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committees receive an annual retainer fee of $5,500,
and a per-meeting fee of $750 for serving on those committees.
The annual retainer fee for members of the Audit Committee is
$7,500, and the per-meeting fee is $1,000. Executive Committee
members receive no annual retainer but are paid $1,000 per
meeting attended. The chairmen of the Audit, Compensation and
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees receive an
additional annual fee of $3,000.
Directors are paid $750 for each half-day of board-related work
outside of regular board or committee meetings, such as for
additional information meetings, site visits, and the like.
Non-officer directors were granted 4,000 options to purchase
shares of company common stock in February 2003. These options
have vested.
Officer members of the board of directors do not receive any
fees for serving as members of the board or as members of any
committees of the board of directors.
We have a supplemental retirement benefit agreement with Paul H.
Granzow. This agreement provides that Standard Register will
supplement his Stanreco Retirement Plan benefits to ensure that
he will receive annual retirement benefits equal to the greater
of $150,000 or 50% of the average annual compensation paid to
him in the last five years before his employment terminates.
3
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL
HOLDERS
Owners of More than 5% of the Common and Class A Stock
of Standard Register
This table gives information regarding all of the persons known
by us to own, in their name or beneficially, 5% or more of the
outstanding class A stock and common stock of Standard
Register as of January 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
Address of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
Beneficial |
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Voting | |
Owners |
|
Class |
|
of Shares | |
|
of Class | |
|
Power | |
| |
Paul H. Granzow
and
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
2,516,856 |
|
|
|
53.27 |
|
|
|
38.54 |
|
James L. Sherman |
|
Common
|
|
|
5,810,508 |
|
|
|
24.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trustees(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 Albany Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton, Ohio 45408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary C.
Nushawg(2) |
|
Class A
|
|
|
359,551 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
600 Albany Street
|
|
Common
|
|
|
842,996 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton, Ohio 45408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James L.
Sherman(2) |
|
Class A
|
|
|
359,551 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
600 Albany Street
|
|
Common
|
|
|
909,795 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton, Ohio 45408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia L.
Begley(2) |
|
Class A
|
|
|
359,550 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
600 Albany Street
|
|
Common
|
|
|
830,073 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton, Ohio 45408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fifth Third
Bank(3),
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
1,081,392 |
|
|
|
22.89 |
|
|
|
16.76 |
|
Trustee |
|
Common
|
|
|
2,595,312 |
|
|
|
10.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fifth Third
Bank(4),
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
1,071,624 |
|
|
|
22.68 |
|
|
|
16.61 |
|
Trustee |
|
Common
|
|
|
2,571,912 |
|
|
|
10.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
John Q. Sherman, deceased, a founder of Standard Register, set
up a trust in his will for the benefit of his family. The
current trustees of that trust are Paul H. Granzow and James L.
Sherman. The trust holds voting securities, including the shares
of class A and common stock of Standard Register listed in
this table, in separate, equal trusts for John Q. Shermans
three surviving children, and for the heirs of his deceased
children. Each child or heir is a life beneficiary of his or her
respective trust. The trustees share voting and investment power
for the securities in the trusts. The will of John Q. Sherman
requires the trustees to give each beneficiary who is a child of
John Q. Sherman, upon his or her request, a proxy allowing the
beneficiary to vote the shares held in his or her respective
trust. |
|
(2) |
Each of these individuals is a child of John Q. Sherman,
deceased. None of them owns in his or her own name more than 5%
of the outstanding voting securities of Standard Register;
however, each has the right, upon his or her request, to vote
the shares of Standard Register stock held in his or her
respective trust created under the will of John Q. Sherman,
deceased. |
|
(3) |
William C. Sherman, deceased, also a founder of Standard
Register, set up a trust in his will which provides for the
payment of net income for life to Helen Margaret Hook Clarke,
his niece. The trustee, The Fifth Third Bank, has the sole
voting and investment power for the voting securities in this
trust. |
|
(4) |
William C. Sherman, during his lifetime, created a trust
agreement dated December 29, 1939, which provides for the
payment of net income for life to Helen Margaret Hook Clarke and
the children of John Q. Sherman. The Fifth Third Bank has the
sole voting and investment power for the voting securities in
this trust. |
4
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
Each director and currently employed executive officer listed in
the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive
officers as a group own, in their own name or beneficially,
class A stock and common stock of Standard Register on
January 1, 2006, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Voting | |
Beneficial Owners |
|
Class |
|
of Shares | |
|
of Class | |
|
Power | |
| |
Roy W. Begley,
Jr.(1)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
8,328 |
|
|
|
.035 |
|
|
|
.017 |
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donna L. Beladi
|
|
Common
|
|
|
69,222 |
|
|
|
.287 |
|
|
|
.145 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Strategy Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig J. Brown
(2)(3)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
253,028 |
|
|
|
1.050 |
|
|
|
.530 |
|
Sr. Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer & Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. David Clarke,
III(2)(4)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
15,889 |
|
|
|
.066 |
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
.108 |
|
|
|
.087 |
|
Robert J.
Crescenzi(2)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
12,554 |
|
|
|
.052 |
|
|
|
.026 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Excellence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul H.
Granzow(2)(5)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
84,563 |
|
|
|
.351 |
|
|
|
.177 |
|
Director & Chairman of
Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sherrill W.
Hudson(2)(7)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
.025 |
|
|
|
.013 |
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathryn A.
Lamme(2) |
|
Common
|
|
|
81,087 |
|
|
|
.336 |
|
|
|
.170 |
|
Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph P. Morgan,
Jr.(2) |
|
Common
|
|
|
76,417 |
|
|
|
.317 |
|
|
|
.160 |
|
Vice President,
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis L.
Rediker(2)(6) |
|
Common
|
|
|
294,913 |
|
|
|
1.223 |
|
|
|
.618 |
|
Director, President &
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
Scavullo(2)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
8,480 |
|
|
|
.035 |
|
|
|
.018 |
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Schiff,
Jr.(2)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
67,700 |
|
|
|
.281 |
|
|
|
.142 |
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Q. Sherman,
II(2)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
15,111 |
|
|
|
.063 |
|
|
|
.032 |
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current executive officers and
|
|
Common
|
|
|
993,293 |
|
|
|
4.120 |
|
|
|
2.081 |
|
directors as a group
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
.108 |
|
|
|
.053 |
|
(13 persons)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Margaret Begley, the wife of Roy W. Begley, Jr., owns 140 shares
of common stock, as to which Mr. Begley disclaims
beneficial ownership. Mrs. Begley is also the trustee of
600 shares of common stock for the benefit of their children,
Lauren A. Begley and Kathleen A. Begley, as to which
Mr. Begley disclaims beneficial ownership. |
|
(2) |
Includes the following options to purchase Standard Register
common stock exercisable before April 28, 2006: Roy W.
Begley, Jr.-4,000 shares; Donna L. Beladi-53,290 shares; Craig
J. Brown-204,640 shares; F. David Clarke, III-4,000 shares;
Robert J. Crescenzi-0 shares; Paul H. Granzow-35,000 shares;
Sherrill W. Hudson-4,000 shares; Kathryn A. Lamme-48,200 shares:
Joseph P. Morgan-47,825 shares; Dennis L. Rediker-77,895 shares;
Ann Scavullo-4,000 shares; John Q. Sherman, II-4,000 shares;
John J. Schiff, Jr.-4,000 shares; and all executive officers and
directors as a group-490,850 shares. |
|
(3) |
Rebecca H. Appenzeller, the wife of Craig J. Brown, owns 10,500
shares of Standard Register common stock. Mr. Brown
disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Todd J. Brown, a
child of Craig J. Brown, owns 50 shares of Standard Register
common stock. Craig J. Brown also disclaims beneficial ownership
of these shares. |
|
(4) |
F. David Clarke, III, and his wife, Loretta M. Clarke, own as
joint tenants 6,776 shares of Standard Register common stock,
which is accounted for in the total noted. |
|
(5) |
Paul H. Granzow (along with James L. Sherman) is a trustee under
the Will of John Q. Sherman. The trustees have the power to vote
shares held in the separate trusts in the event that the
beneficiaries of the trusts eligible to vote the shares in their
trust do not desire to exercise that right. The John Q. Sherman
Trusts own 2,516,856 shares of class A stock and 5,810,508
shares of common stock which in the aggregate represents 38.54%
of the outstanding votes of the Company. The trustees share the
investment power with respect to class A and common stock
held by the trusts. The beneficiaries of the trusts do not have
the investment power with respect to the securities in these
trusts. Lana T. Granzow, the wife of Paul H. Granzow, owns
3,659.38 shares of Standard Register common stock.
Mr. Granzow disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
5
|
|
(6) |
Sharon A. Rediker, the wife of Dennis L. Rediker, owns 581
shares of common stock, as to which Mr. Rediker disclaims
beneficial ownership. Mrs. Rediker is also the custodian of
780 shares of common stock for the benefit of her grandchildren,
as to which Mr. Rediker disclaims beneficial ownership. |
|
(7) |
These shares are held jointly with Mr. Hudsons wife,
Mary Ann Hudson. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires directors, executive officers and holders of 10% or
more of our common stock to report certain transactions in the
common stock to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on
our records, we believe all Securities and Exchange Commission
filings with respect to directors, executive officers and
holders of 10% or more of our common stock have been made in a
timely manner.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Stock | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Award | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary ($) | |
|
Bonus ($)(1) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
(#) | |
|
($)(3) | |
| |
Dennis L. Rediker |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
195,300 |
|
|
|
865,896 |
|
|
|
44,100 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
President &
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
352,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Craig J. Brown |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
280,500 |
|
|
|
52,173 |
|
|
|
327,000 |
|
|
|
16,700 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
Sr. Vice President, Treasurer
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
280,288 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
18,590 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
& Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
164,407 |
|
|
|
39,375 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Joseph P. Morgan,
Jr. |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
260,100 |
|
|
|
48,379 |
|
|
|
214,512 |
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
|
|
9,754 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
259,515 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
17,050 |
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
107,373 |
|
|
|
28,050 |
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
Kathryn A. Lamme |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
46,500 |
|
|
|
289,068 |
|
|
|
14,800 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
227,246 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
General Counsel & Secretary
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
64,160 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Donna L. Beladi |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
37,200 |
|
|
|
164,808 |
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
182,565 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
Chief Strategy Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
60,813 |
|
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
Robert J.
Crescenzi(4) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
74,556 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
25,667 |
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8,130 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
Business Excellence
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
65,853 |
|
|
|
14,625 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Each years amounts include cash and/or stock incentives
earned by the officers in that year but paid in the following
year. |
|
(2) |
The amount recorded for 2003 is the value of two stock grants
made under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan. The first of these
2003 grants, made in February 2003, vests ratably over four
years commencing on the first anniversary of date of grant.
Grants to executive officers in February 2003 were:
Mr. Brown-2,917 shares; Mr. Morgan-1,834 shares;
Ms. Lamme-1,000 shares; Ms. Beladi-834 shares; and
Mr. Crescenzi-1,084 shares. The second 2003 grants, made in
August 2003, vest on the third anniversary of the grant date,
but are subject to a performance accelerator. Grants in August
2003 to executive officers were: Mr. Rediker-20,000 shares;
Mr. Brown-6,000 shares; Mr. Morgan-4,000 shares;
Ms. Lamme-2,500 shares; Ms. Beladi-2,500 shares; and
Mr. Crescenzi-2,500 shares. Grants made to executive
officers in 2005 were Performance Restricted Shares. Vesting of
these shares is conditioned upon attainment of specified
performance target by the end of 2007. Grants in 2005 to
executive officers were: Mr. Rediker-66,200 shares;
Mr. Brown-25,000 shares; Mr. Morgan-16,400 shares;
Ms. Lamme-22,100 shares; Ms. Beladi-12,600 shares; and
Mr. Crescenzi-5,700 shares. See the Compensation Committee
Report section further describing these incentives. The
aggregate restricted stock holding for each named executive
officer, valued as of January 1, 2006 is:
Mr. Rediker-$1,362,822; Mr. Brown-$536,212;
Mr. Morgan-$348,863; Ms. Lamme-$403,408;
Ms. Beladi-$251,885; and Mr. Crescenzi-$146,764.
Dividends paid to executive officers in 2005 with respect to
their grants of restricted stock are as follows:
Mr. Rediker-$82,229; Mr. Brown-$25,453;
Mr. Morgan-$19,289; Ms. Lamme-$18,391;
Ms. Beladi-$11,750; and Mr. Crescenzi-$7,229. |
|
(3) |
The amounts in this column for Messrs. Rediker, Brown,
Morgan, Crescenzi, Ms. Lamme and Ms. Beladi are the
matching contributions paid by the Company to The Standard
Register Employees Savings Plan. The Savings Plan has two
formulas for determining the percentage match from the Company.
The original formula provides that for the first 6% of the
participants compensation deferred into the Savings Plan,
the Company will match ten cents on the dollar. The original
formula is used in connection with the traditional retirement
plan benefit formula, described in the section Retirement
Plans. Mr. Brown, Ms. Lamme, and Ms. Beladi are
covered by the original formula. Messrs. Rediker, Morgan and
Crescenzi are covered by the second formula applicable to all
employees joining the Company after January 1, 2000. From
2000 to December 2004, the second |
6
|
|
|
formula matched fifty cents of the
dollar for the first 6% of the participants compensation
deferred into the Savings Plan. Starting in January 2005, with
the freezing of the second pension formula, the match for
employees hired after January 1, 2000, was raised to
seventy-five cents on the dollar for the first 6% deferred into
the Savings Plan. Employee compensation deferrals to the Savings
Plan are fully vested. The matching contribution vests after
five years of service with Standard Register.
|
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Crescenzi resigned from the company effective
December 31, 2005. The amount in the All Other
Compensation column for Mr. Crescenzi for 2005
includes $16,667, the value accrued at December 31, 2005,
for separation pay pursuant to agreement with
Mr. Crescenzi. In addition, the company has entered into a
Consulting Agreement with Mr. Crescenzi, dated January 1,
2006, whereby the company will pay Mr. Crescenzi a total of
$150,000 for consulting services through October 31, 2006. In
the event the Consulting Agreement is terminated without cause
by either party prior to October 31, 2006, the company will
pay Mr. Crescenzi the remaining balance of the $150,000. |
Named Executive Officers
This section provides information concerning each of the
executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table with
the exception of Mr. Rediker, who is a nominee for
director. Similar information regarding Mr. Rediker may be
found in the section dealing with Proposal 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served As |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Officer Since |
|
|
|
|
|
Craig J. Brown
|
|
56 |
|
1987 |
Mr. Brown has been
Senior Vice President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
since March 1995. From January 1993 until March 1995, he was
Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer.
Prior to January 1993, he served Standard Register in various
executive and financial positions.
|
Joseph P. Morgan,
Jr. |
|
46 |
|
2003 |
Mr. Morgan has been
Vice President, Chief Technology Officer & General
Manager, On Demand Solutions, since December 2005. From January
2003 to December 2005, he served as Vice President, Chief
Technology Officer. He was President and Chief Executive Officer
of SMARTworks, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,
from July 2001 until January 2003. From January 2001 to July
2001, Mr. Morgan was President and Chief Executive Officer
of Transvision, Inc. Mr. Morgan served as President and
Chief Operating Officer of eflatbed.com from February 2000 to
January 2001, and was also Executive Vice President of
Quadivius, Inc., the holding company for eflatbed.com, from
August 2000 to January 2001. From November 1999 to February
2000, Mr. Morgan was principal of J. P. Morgan, Jr.
Consulting. He served as President and Chairman of SONY Chemical
Corporation of America from June 1994 to November 1999.
|
Kathryn A. Lamme |
|
59 |
|
1998 |
Ms. Lamme has served as
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary of the
Company since April 2002. From April 1998 to April 2002, she was
Vice President, Secretary & Deputy General Counsel.
Before April 1998, she was in private practice.
|
Donna L. Beladi |
|
56 |
|
2000 |
Ms. Beladi has been
Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer since September 2005.
From January 2004 until September 2005, she was Vice President,
Chief Marketing Officer. Between January 2000 and January 2004,
she served as Vice President, Business Development.
|
Robert J. Crescenzi |
|
55 |
|
2001 |
Mr. Crescenzi joined
the Company in January 2001 as Vice President, Six Sigma. In
January 2004, he became Vice President, Business Excellence.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Crescenzi was the Vice
President, Customer Satisfaction and Quality, for the Enterprise
Services and Solutions Group, Compaq Corporation, from January
1998 to December 2000. He resigned from the company effective
December 31, 2005.
|
Retirement Plans
The Stanreco Retirement Plan is our qualified retirement plan.
Prior to January 1, 2000, this Plan was funded in part by
contributions from participants. After January 1, 2000, the
Plan is funded entirely by Company contributions and investments
earnings.
The traditional formula of the Stanreco Retirement Plan covers
plan participants hired before January 1, 2000, and the
pension equity plan formula (PEP) which
became effective January 1, 2000, covers employees hired
after January 1, 2000, and employees hired before that date
who elected to be covered under the PEP formula. Under the
traditional formula, participants are eligible for a retirement
benefit equal to a percentage of final average earnings.
Accruals under the PEP formula were frozen December 31,
2004, and no employees hired after that date can participate in
the Stanreco Retirement Plan.
7
We have a Non-Qualified Retirement Plan which supplements the
Stanreco Retirement Plan. It provides retirement benefits that
would have been payable from the Stanreco Retirement Plan but
for the limits imposed by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. We also
have an Officers Supplemental Non-Qualified Plan which
pays retirement benefits in addition to the Stanreco Retirement
Plan and Non-Qualified Retirement Plan based on the number of
years of credited service as an officer in excess of five years.
Standard Register does not currently fund or contribute to
either the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan or the Officers
Supplemental Non-Qualified Plan, but does accrue for projected
benefit expense annually for both plans, and pays benefits from
general corporate assets.
Retirement Plan Tables 1(A), 1(B) and 2
Table 1 shows the estimated annual retirement benefits payable
from the Stanreco Retirement Plan and the Non-Qualified
Retirement Plan to our employees for specified compensation
levels and years of service. Table 1(A) shows the estimated
benefits under the traditional formula. Table 1(B) shows
estimated annual benefits at various retirement ages for the PEP
formula, which is now frozen. The lump sum value of the PEP
benefit increases at 4% per year. At retirement ages, it may be
converted to an annuity based on current interest rates. The
estimates below assume the conversion is based on 5% interest.
Mr. Browns, Ms. Lammes, and
Ms. Beladis benefits will be calculated under Table
1(A). Messrs. Redikers, Crescenzis, and
Morgans benefits will be calculated under Table 1(B). Part
of the estimated annual benefits on Table 1(A) include the
return of and earnings on contributions made by employees during
the time the Plan required employee contributions.
Table 2 shows the estimated annual retirement benefits payable
from the Officers Supplemental Non-Qualified Plan to
officers based on compensation and years of officer service (in
excess of five years). Mr. Crescenzi is not eligible for
retirement benefits from the Officers Supplemental
Non-Qualified Plan due to the fact he did not retire from the
company. His retirement benefit will be calculated solely from
Table 1(B). Current officers annual retirement benefit
will be (i) the sum of the benefits from Tables 1(A) or
1(B), and Table 2, or (ii) 50% of the average of the
highest five years of compensation, whichever is less.
TABLE 1(A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of Five | |
|
Years of Credited Service | |
Highest Years of | |
|
| |
Compensation | |
|
1 | |
|
5 | |
|
10 | |
|
15 | |
|
20 | |
|
25 | |
|
30 | |
|
35 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
26,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,000 |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
78,000 |
|
|
$ |
91,000 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
58,500 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
136,000 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
162,500 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
227,500 |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
45,500 |
|
|
|
91,000 |
|
|
|
136,500 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
227,500 |
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
318,500 |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
312,000 |
|
|
|
364,000 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
58,500 |
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
242,500 |
|
|
|
351,000 |
|
|
|
409,500 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
455,000 |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
14,300 |
|
|
|
71,500 |
|
|
|
143,000 |
|
|
|
214,500 |
|
|
|
286,000 |
|
|
|
357,500 |
|
|
|
429,000 |
|
|
|
500,500 |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
312,000 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
468,000 |
|
|
|
546,000 |
|
TABLE 1(B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Ages | |
|
|
| |
|
|
55 | |
|
60 | |
|
62 | |
|
65 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dennis L. Rediker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,862 |
|
|
$ |
14,346 |
|
Joseph P. Morgan, Jr.
|
|
$ |
3,856 |
|
|
$ |
5,160 |
|
|
$ |
5,832 |
|
|
$ |
7,053 |
|
Robert J. Crescenzi
|
|
$ |
2,715 |
|
|
$ |
3,633 |
|
|
$ |
4,107 |
|
|
$ |
4,967 |
|
8
TABLE 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of Five | |
|
Years of Officer Service in Excess of Five | |
Highest Years of | |
|
| |
Compensation | |
|
1 | |
|
5 | |
|
10 | |
|
15 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
30,500 |
|
|
$ |
61,000 |
|
|
$ |
91,500 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
9,150 |
|
|
|
45,750 |
|
|
|
91,500 |
|
|
|
137,250 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
183,000 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
15,250 |
|
|
|
76,250 |
|
|
|
152,500 |
|
|
|
228,750 |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
91,500 |
|
|
|
183,000 |
|
|
|
274,500 |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
21,350 |
|
|
|
106,750 |
|
|
|
213,500 |
|
|
|
320,250 |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
244,000 |
|
|
|
366,000 |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
27,450 |
|
|
|
137,250 |
|
|
|
274,500 |
|
|
|
411,750 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
30,500 |
|
|
|
152,500 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
457,500 |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
33,550 |
|
|
|
167,750 |
|
|
|
335,500 |
|
|
|
503,250 |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
36,600 |
|
|
|
183,000 |
|
|
|
366,000 |
|
|
|
549,000 |
|
With respect to the traditional formula, estimated annual
benefits are based upon the assumption that the employee remains
in the service of Standard Register until age 62. At age 62, the
employee qualifies for the maximum retirement percentage
benefit. Retirement before age 62 will result in actuarially
reduced benefits. The estimated annual benefits are taxable
income but are not subject to any deduction for social security
benefits. No additional benefit can be earned from the
Officers Supplemental Non-Qualified Plan after the
sixteenth year of officer service.
The table below shows the average of the highest five years of
total compensation and the years of service and officer service
earned to date for each executive officer listed in the Summary
Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Highest Five | |
|
Years of | |
|
Years of | |
|
|
Years of | |
|
Credited | |
|
Officer | |
Name |
|
Total Compensation | |
|
Service | |
|
Service | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dennis L. Rediker
|
|
$ |
801,420 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Craig J. Brown
|
|
$ |
569,077 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Joseph P. Morgan, Jr.
(1)
|
|
$ |
264,710 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Kathryn A. Lamme
|
|
$ |
243,826 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Donna L. Beladi
|
|
$ |
194,969 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Robert J. Crescenzi
|
|
$ |
230,252 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Morgans service as President and CEO of the
Companys wholly owned subsidiary, SMARTworks, LLC, is
counted for purposes of the retirement plans. |
Mr. Redikers Employment Contract
The Company has an employment contract with Mr. Rediker
which supplements his benefits under the plans described above,
in order to ensure that Mr. Rediker receives annual
retirement benefits equal to a percentage of the average of base
salary paid to him in his final three years of employment. The
percentage specified in the contract ranges from 35% of average
base salary, to a maximum of 50% of average base salary
depending on length of service. Mr. Rediker has served as
Chief Executive Officer a sufficient number of years to qualify
for supplemental retirement benefits totaling 50% of his average
annual base salary. The contract provides that retirement
benefits which Mr. Rediker receives from prior employment
with other companies, shall be netted against Standard
Registers obligation to pay 50% of average annual base
salary. The contract also contains a change in
control feature which entitles Mr. Rediker to one
year of compensation, including base salary, bonus and the value
of non-cash benefits, in the event a change in ownership of the
company results in termination of his employment or less
favorable terms of employment.
9
Stock Option Tables
Options to purchase common stock of Standard Register for each
executive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table are
as follows:
Option Grants During 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Total Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Rate of Stock | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
|
|
Price Appreciation for | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Option Term | |
|
|
Options | |
|
in | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted | |
|
2005 | |
|
(per share) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dennis L. Rediker
|
|
|
44,100 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
$ |
12.89 |
|
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
$ |
357,495 |
|
|
$ |
905,961 |
|
Craig J. Brown
|
|
|
16,700 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
135,378 |
|
|
|
343,074 |
|
Joseph P. Morgan, Jr.
|
|
|
10,900 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
88,360 |
|
|
|
223,922 |
|
Kathryn A. Lamme
|
|
|
14,800 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
119,975 |
|
|
|
304,041 |
|
Donna L. Beladi
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
68,094 |
|
|
|
172,564 |
|
Robert J. Crescenzi
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
02/23/2015 |
|
|
|
30,805 |
|
|
|
78,065 |
|
Options to purchase common stock of Standard Register exercised
in 2005 for each executive officer listed in the Summary
Compensation Table are as follows:
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2005
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money Options | |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
|
|
Options at 1/1/06 | |
|
at 1/1/06 | |
|
|
on | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
Name |
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Dennis L. Rediker
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
66,870/44,100 |
|
|
$ |
64,275/128,772 |
|
Craig J. Brown
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200,465/16,700 |
|
|
|
144,963/48,764 |
|
Joseph P. Morgan, Jr.
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
45,100/10,900 |
|
|
|
0/31,828 |
|
Kathryn A. Lamme
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
44,500/14,800 |
|
|
|
29,365/43,216 |
|
Donna L. Beladi
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
51,190/8,400 |
|
|
|
24,445/24,528 |
|
Robert J. Crescenzi
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
47,755/0 |
|
|
|
4,995/0 |
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and assuring
the integrity of Standard Registers financial reporting
process. It accomplishes this function by assessing the internal
accounting and auditing practices of the Company, and the
independent auditors fulfillment of its role in the
financial reporting process. The board of directors adopted a
written charter for the Audit Committee in April 2000 further
describing the role of the Committee. This Charter is reviewed
annually by the Audit Committee and the review is reported to
the board of directors. The Audit Committee Charter may be
accessed on the Company Web site, www.standardregister.com, as
indicated below.
The Audit Committee held eleven meetings in 2005.
Mr. Hudson is Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Messrs. Clarke and Schiff, and Ms. Scavullo are the
other members.
The Audit Committee in 2005 conducted an annual self-assessment
of its overall operating effectiveness. The results of this
self-assessment were analyzed and discussed by Audit Committee
members in an effort to improve the overall quality of corporate
governance and financial oversight provided to the Company.
The board of directors has determined the members of its Audit
Committee meet the independence and financial literacy
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, the
board has determined that one member in particular satisfies the
Audit Committee financial expert qualifications
contained in regulations issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. Specifically, the board has concluded that Audit
Committee Chairman Sherrill W. Hudson qualifies as an Audit
Committee financial expert given his 37-year career with
Deloitte & Touche, a firm of certified public accountants.
Mr. Hudsons experience with respect to audits of
financial statements of publicly held companies, internal
controls, application of GAAP and audit committee functions, and
his independence as a board member, meet the criteria for
Audit Committee financial expert established by the
board in conformity with the regulations and New York Stock
Exchange Listing Standards.
10
During 2005, the Audit Committee reviewed interim quarterly
financial statements with management and the independent
auditors. This review was conducted prior to filing of the
Companys 10-Q reports containing the respective interim
quarterly financial statements. In addition, the Committee
reviewed and discussed the 2005 year-end audited financial
statements with executive management, including the chief
financial officer, and the independent auditors. This review
took place prior to publication of the audited financial
statements in the 10-K filing and annual report to shareholders.
Each review was conducted with the understanding that management
is responsible for preparing the Companys financial
statements, and the independent auditors are responsible for
examining the statements.
In further discharge of its responsibilities, the Audit
Committee met with the independent auditors, both in the
presence of management and privately. The Committee and
independent auditors discussed those matters described in
Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication
with Audit Committee. These discussions included review of
the scope of the audit performed with respect to the
Companys financial statements. The Companys internal
auditor also met with the Committee to review the effectiveness
of the Companys internal controls and the internal
auditors responsibilities in that regard, and other
compliance and audit matters. The Company has maintained an
internal audit function for many years. In addition, the
Committee conducted regular private meetings with General
Counsel, and with management, including the chief financial
officer and corporate controller.
The Audit Committee received and discussed periodic reports of
management and the internal auditor, with respect to design and
assessment of the Companys internal controls over the
financial reporting process. The Committee further received and
discussed the report of the independent auditors with respect to
their audit of internal controls over financial reporting
performed by the independent auditors in conjunction with the
audit of the companys financial statements, as set forth
in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard
No. 2.
The Audit Committee received the independent auditors
written statement required by Independence Standards Board
Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees. This written statement described any
relationships between the independent auditors and the Company
that may reasonably be thought to bear on independence.
Following receipt of this written statement and discussions of
the matters described in it, the Committee was satisfied as to
the auditors independence.
Based upon the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the
board of directors that the audited financial statements be
included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K,
for fiscal year ending January 1, 2006, for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee recommended, and the board adopted, the
Companys Code of Ethics and re-emphasized that directors,
and all Company employees, including principal executive
officers and senior financial officers, are subject to the
letter and spirit of the Code. The Code of Ethics covers such
topics as conflicts of interest, confidentiality, compliance
with legal requirements, and other business ethics subjects. It
has been distributed to all employees and is made available on
the Companys Web site, www.standardregister.com, by
clicking on the About SR section. The Code of Ethics
link appears in the left column, as does the link to the
Committees Charter. Printed copies of the Code of Ethics
are available by contacting the Corporate Secretarys
office, 600 Albany Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408.
The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt,
retention and investigation of complaints regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters. Any interested
person may contact the Audit Committee directly through the
Companys external Web site by clicking on About
SR then Corporate Governance and following the
link to contact the Audit Committee. Company employees may
contact the Audit Committee, anonymously if they wish, through a
toll-free telephone number linked to a third party who will
record complaints related to accounting and auditing matters and
forward such complaints directly to the Audit Committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEES TO INDEPENDENT AUDITOR |
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
954,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,056,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
64,800 |
|
|
|
71,500 |
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
1,026,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,134,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee has adopted a procedure for pre-approval of
all fees charged by Battelle & Battelle, LLP, the
companys independent auditors. Under the procedure, the
Audit Committee approves the engagement letter with respect to
audit and review services, and the minimal tax fees noted on the
table above. Audit-related, tax fees beyond
11
the minimal amount in the engagement letter, and other fees are
subject to pre-approval by the entire Committee, or, in the
period between meetings, by a designated member of the Audit
Committee. Any such approval by the designated member is
disclosed to the entire Audit Committee at the next meeting. All
audit-related and tax fees paid to Battelle & Battelle, LLP,
with respect to the 2005 audit year were pre-approved by the
Audit Committee.
The category of audit fees includes the audit of Standard
Registers annual consolidated financial statements, the
audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review
of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by
Battelle & Battelle, LLP, in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services
provided by Battelle & Battelle, LLP, that were reasonably
related to the performance of the audit or review of our
financial statements. It included fees billed in 2005 and 2004
for the audit of our benefit plans and accounting consultation.
The audit-related fees are for services generally required to be
performed by Battelle & Battelle, LLP, because they follow
upon and are linked to Battelle & Battelle, LLPs audit
of the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Tax fees consist of professional services performed by Battelle
& Battelle, LLP for tax consultation in both 2005 and 2004.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of
audit-related and tax services by Battelle & Battelle, LLP,
is compatible with maintaining such firms independence.
The Audit Committee:
Sherrill W. Hudson (Chairman)
F. David Clarke, III
Ann Scavullo
John J. Schiff, Jr.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the board of directors is composed
solely of independent directors, none of whom have any
interlocking relationships with Standard Register that are
subject to disclosure under the rules of the SEC relating to
proxy statements. The Compensation Committee has the overall
responsibility for determining specific compensation levels for
executive officers and bonuses for executive officers and
certain other employees. The Compensation Committee administers
the following plans:
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Registers 1995 Stock Option Plan (the Stock
Option Plan) as approved by the shareholders on
April 17, 1996 |
|
|
|
The Standard Register 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Equity Incentive Plan), as approved by the
shareholders on April 17, 2002 |
|
|
|
Management Incentive Compensation Plan (Incentive
Plan) as approved by the shareholders on April 16,
1997, and amended by the shareholders on April 17, 2002 |
|
|
|
The Deferred Compensation Plan, and |
|
|
|
The Officers Supplemental Non-Qualified Retirement Plan. |
The Compensation Committee held nine meetings in 2005.
Mr. Clarke is Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
Messrs. Begley, Hudson, and Sherman, and Ms. Scavullo
are the other members.
Along with the full board of directors, the Compensation
Committee in 2005 took part in an annual assessment of its
overall operating effectiveness. As part of this assessment,
members evaluated the Compensation Committees performance
and contributions, and held a thorough discussion of the results
of the survey in an effort to improve the overall quality of
corporate governance provided to the Company.
In 2005, the Committee adopted Guiding Principles for Executive
Compensation, which codified the framework under which the
Committee will continue to analyze and establish executive pay
and incentives. The Guidelines address overall philosophy,
compensation positioning and mix, competitive context,
performance measurement, and other factors.
Standard Registers fundamental objective is the creation
of sustainable shareholder value, through both stock price
appreciation and maintenance of the companys dividend. The
Compensation Committees key charge is, therefore, to
establish an executive compensation program that serves this
objective. The Compensation Committee believes that
12
the interests of management and shareholders can be most closely
aligned by providing executives with market-competitive and
internally fair levels of compensation that link executive pay
to overall corporate performance and strategy.
As such, the Compensation Committee has adopted a multi-step
method of determining executive officer pay levels. First, as is
common practice among many public companies, it identifies the
market values of total compensation and individual
components of pay, e.g., base salaries, annual incentives, and
long-term incentives. This market has been defined by the
Compensation Committee as a comparator group of companies
comprised of companies at or near Standard Registers size
in the general industry, companies that are talent competitors,
companies in Standard Registers industry, and companies of
similar size with similar business characteristics to Standard
Register.
Second, the Compensation Committee assigns to each executive
officer role (not the incumbent himself or herself) a rating
evaluating strategic value to the Company. In doing so,
the Compensation Committee is indicating the degree to which a
certain role either maintains, enables, or optimizes Standard
Registers ability to meet its financial targets and
strategic objectives. Pay for executive officer roles is
targeted between the 35th and 75th percentiles of the
competitive market based on this assessment of strategic value.
Finally, the Compensation Committee receives the evaluation of
the Chief Executive Officer with respect to the performance of
each incumbent officer. The Committee performs its own
evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer.
The Compensation Committee retains the counsel of an independent
executive compensation consulting firm in the design and
implementation of this method of determining pay levels. The
Compensation Committee works with its outside advisor to
determine the relevant market for the Companys executive
talent, link the appropriate drivers of successful strategy
execution to executive pay levels, and set such pay levels to be
both market-competitive and internally appropriate. The
Committee has retained the counsel and services of this
independent advisor with respect to incentive plan design and
other related areas as well.
The compensation system developed by the Compensation Committee
has been designed so that a relatively high percentage of total
compensation is incentive-based. The Stock Option Plan and
Equity Incentive Plan are designed to base a portion of the
executive officers compensation upon the total return to
shareholders of Standard Registers stock. The Incentive
Plan is designed to provide rewards to executives for hitting
key financial objectives.
All executive compensation for 2005 was fully deductible for
federal income tax purposes.
Base Compensation
Executive officers salaries are reviewed and approved
annually by the Compensation Committee. Salaries for each
executive officer, including the Chief Executive Officer, are
set at levels deemed by the Compensation Committee to be
reasonable and fair, and reflective of both the importance of
the role and individual performance. This includes a review of
competitive industry practices, role criticality, individual job
responsibilities, level of experience, and job performance. Job
performance is judged on both a subjective and objective basis,
the latter measured against objectives agreed upon at the outset
of the year. At the request of executive management, the
Committee made no base salary adjustments to officers for 2005,
with the exception of Ms. Lamme, whose base salary was
increased when she assumed responsibility for Human Resources as
well as the Legal Department. Executive management made this
request taking into account the Companys situation and
recent performance.
In general, in years when executive officer salary adjustments
are considered, the Compensation Committees objective is
to set and maintain levels of pay that are internally equitable
and sufficient to attract and retain talented executives. As one
input to the process of establishing salaries, the Compensation
Committees outside executive compensation consulting firm
compiles and analyzes competitive pay levels. These competitive
pay levels of officer salaries and bonus levels are established
via the comparator group.
As discussed above, in order to help establish internally
equitable and appropriate levels of pay, the Compensation
Committee sets executive salary levels commensurate with each
roles expected contribution to the advancement of Standard
Registers overall business strategy. Further, the
Compensation Committee will take into account the performance
evaluation made by Mr. Rediker with respect to each non-CEO
executive. Over the last two years, the Compensation Committee
has targeted executive salaries at levels between the 35th and
75th percentiles of the competitive market salary values. For
2005, most of the executive officer salaries were between the
50th and 75th percentile. The data from these groups is compiled
to arrive at a market value for each of the executive officers.
Mr. Redikers base salary for 2005 was also positioned
consistent with this philosophy. However, Mr. Rediker
declined to be considered for a salary increase in 2005. For
further detail on Mr. Redikers compensation, see
section entitled Compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer.
13
Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee administers the Incentive Plan, which
became effective January 1, 1997. Six employees were
covered by the Incentive Plan in 2005. The Compensation
Committee selects the participants, determines the amount and
terms of each incentive award and decides whether the award
shall be made available in cash, Standard Register stock, or a
combination of the two. The Incentive Plan, and its amendment,
was approved by the shareholders, so as to preserve the
tax-deductibility offered under Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code for incentive compensation.
Incentive awards to the Incentive Plan participants are subject
to objective performance goals established by the Compensation
Committee. Goals are adjusted from year to year depending on the
relevant business focus of the Company for the year. The
Compensation Committee certifies to the board of directors each
year the extent to which the performance objectives have been
achieved.
The Compensation Committee adopted performance goals to measure
short-term executive performance in 2005. At the recommendation
of executive management, the target bonus for plan achievement
was set at one-half the percentage of base salary that the
Committee had previously determined was competitive and
reasonable. This reduced the bonus potential for executive
officers. The primary measure was earnings on operations, as
adjusted for items such as impairment, restructuring and pension
amortization. The Compensation Committee required that a
threshold level of earnings per share be attained in order for
any incentive awards to be earned by executives in 2005. This
threshold level was attained and exceeded, resulting in the
incentive awards listed in the Summary Compensation Table.
Stock Options and Stock Awards
The Compensation Committee also administers the Stock Option
Plan, which became effective October 19, 1995, and the
Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by shareholders on
April 17, 2002. The Stock Option Plan expired in December
2005. No further grants will be made from this Plan.
Approximately 175 employees were granted options under the Stock
Option Plan in 2005. Forty-one employees were granted stock
awards in 2005. The objectives of the Stock Option Plan and
Equity Incentive Plan are to focus executive officers and
certain key employees of Standard Register to increase the
long-term value of Standard Registers common stock by
granting stock options and stock awards. The Stock Option Plan
and Equity Incentive Plan also align the interests of
participants with those of Standard Registers
shareholders. Dividends are paid to grantees of restricted stock
during the restricted period, and grantees may vote these shares.
The Stock Option Plan provides that options may be granted
either as incentive stock options or as non-qualified stock
options. Options may be granted for varying terms of from one to
ten years. Options generally do not become exercisable until one
year from the date of grant. Thereafter, the right to exercise
options vests either: (a) in accordance with a schedule
established at the time of grant, generally at a rate of 25% per
year, cumulative to the extent not exercised in prior periods;
or (b) on a schedule determined by achievement of specific
performance factors. The exercise price for incentive stock
options must be at least 100% of the last sale price on the
exchange on which the stock is trading on the last trading day
prior to the date of grant (fair market value) with
a further exception that incentive options granted to persons
owning more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
Standard Register be a least 110% of such sale price.
In an effort to further focus executives efforts on the
Companys results, and continue to align executives
and shareholder interests, the Compensation Committee made
awards of performance-based restricted stock in addition to
stock options in early 2005 to executive officers. The grants
were part of a three-year cycle, with the value of the grants
split 60%/40% between performance restricted shares and stock
options. The target value of these grants, taken together with
the expected value of the 2005 stock option awards, is intended
to provide each executive officer with the grant size determined
appropriate based on the assessment of market and internally
strategic value. The Compensation Committee has set the vesting
of the performance-based restricted stock awards to be
contingent upon the achievement of pre-established three-year
corporate operating earnings targets. Portions of an
individuals award may vest earlier than 2007 if the
operating earnings targets are achieved prior to that year. No
grants have vested to date. In the event the goal is not met by
the end of the 2007 budget year, the grants are forfeited.
Grants of stock options were made to executive officers in
February 2005. All were granted at the fair market value and
with a vest schedule of 25% upon each of the first four
anniversaries of the grant date. The term of these options is
ten years.
14
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Rediker informed the Committee prior to its December
2004 meeting of his desire that the Committee not consider
granting him a salary increase for 2005. This request was made
in light of Mr. Redikers evaluation of the
Companys 2004 financial and operating results. Thus,
Mr. Redikers salary was kept constant at its
then-current level of $700,000 per year, which was consistent
with its 2002, 2003 and 2004 levels.
With respect to setting Mr. Redikers total
compensation, including incentive and stock awards, the
Committee does not assign an internal value to his role. The
Committee considers the role of President and CEO, unlike the
roles of other executive officers, to have an intrinsically
critical value that cannot strictly be measured against the
internal value of other members of senior management. In
establishing Mr. Redikers compensation, the
Compensation Committee took into account many factors, including
the financial performance of the company, an assessment of his
overall performance as a manager and leader, and the external
market for chief executive officer compensation.
Incentive Compensation: For the fiscal year 2005,
Mr. Redikers target bonus (as a percentage of his
base salary) was set at 37.5, which was half the normal
competitive level previously determined by the Committee. The
reduced target was set at Mr. Redikers request. The
Company met threshold levels for payment of incentive
compensation, resulting in the payment to Mr. Rediker as
disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.
Stock awards: Mr. Rediker was granted restricted
stock and stock options as long-term incentive. Vesting of the
restricted stock is subject to performance measures, as
described in the section Stock Options and Stock
Awards above.
Benefits and Perquisites
The Compensation Committee has endeavored to adhere to a high
level of propriety in managing executive benefits and
perquisites. The Company does not provide for any type of
permanent lodging or personal entertainment for any executive
officer or employee, and the Companys health care and
benefit programs offer substantially the same advantages to all
full-time employees. The Committee has established cash
perquisite accounts of $18,000 for officers, including executive
officers, to be used for club memberships, car expense,
financial and tax planning and the like.
The Compensation Committee:
F. David Clarke, III (Chairman)
Roy W. Begley, Jr.
Sherrill W. Hudson
Ann Scavullo
John Q. Sherman, II
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assists the
board in defining board roles and developing processes to
optimize board functioning. It also studies and recommends
adoption by the board of directors of corporate governance
processes intended to comply with applicable legal, regulatory
and listing standard requirements. In addition, the Committee
oversees the Companys succession planning process and
director nomination process. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee met four times in 2005. Mr. Begley is
Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
and Ms. Scavullo and Mr. Sherman are the other members.
In 2005, the Committee provided leadership to the board of
directors and other committees in performing annual
self-assessments. These self-assessments gave the board and
Committees insight into how they are performing their roles in
the corporate governance process. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee conducted an assessment of its own
performance as part of this process.
The Committee assisted the board of directors in assessing the
independence status of all directors. Using the
Independence Criteria adopted by the board in
conformity with New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards, as
amended, the Committee recommended and the board adopted
findings with respect to the independence of each director.
Directors Roy W. Begley, Jr., F. David Clarke, III, Sherrill W.
Hudson, Ann Scavullo, John J. Schiff, Jr., and John Q. Sherman,
II, were determined to be independent. Chairman Paul H. Granzow
and CEO Dennis L. Rediker were considered not independent since
they are employees of the Company.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the board
of directors, in performing their director-nomination function,
identify director candidates from a range of sources. Primary
among these sources are recommendations from current directors
and major shareholders. The board has not engaged a third party
to assist in the director nomination process, and has paid no
fees in that regard.
15
Director candidates are evaluated by reference to criteria such
as integrity, candor, judgment, skills, and experience with
respect to the industry in which the company operates,
leadership, strategic understanding, and independence. These
factors are considered in the context of the current composition
of the board. A candidate is evaluated against these criteria
regardless of the source of the recommendation.
The policy of the Committee and board is to consider
recommendations for director candidates from any interested
party, especially shareholders. Shareholders who wish to
recommend a director candidate should submit the recommendation
in writing addressed to The Standard Register Company Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee, in care of the Corporate
Secretary, 600 Albany Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408. The
communication should state the name of the candidate, his or her
qualifications, and contact information for the shareholder and
candidate. The submission of shareholder candidates must be
received by the Corporate Secretary by November 17, 2006,
for consideration in the 2007 director nomination process.
The Companys directors all stand for election or
reelection at each annual meeting of shareholders. Directors
make every effort to attend the annual meetings, and, in fact,
all directors have been in attendance at the last three annual
meetings of shareholders. While the board does not have a formal
policy in this regard, its clear practice is for all
directors to be present at the annual meeting of shareholders.
The board is always receptive to communications from
shareholders. Shareholders wishing to communicate with the board
of directors may send communications to The Standard Register
Company Board of Directors, in care of the Corporate Secretary,
600 Albany Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408. Shareholders may also
communicate with the presiding director of the non-management
meetings of the board by sending such communications to the
Corporate Secretary. The board has selected director John Q.
Sherman, II, to preside at the meetings of non-management
directors to be held in 2006. All communications to the board or
to Mr. Sherman will be copied and forwarded by the
Corporate Secretary.
Shareholders and investors may also communicate with the
presiding director of non-management meetings of the board and
with the Audit Committee through the companys Web site,
www.standardregister.com, at the About SR section by
clicking on Corporate Governance. The charters of
all Committees, the Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the
Code of Ethics may also be accessed on the companys Web
site at the About SR, Corporate
Governance section. Printed copies of Committee Charters,
the Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the Code of Ethics are
available upon request by contacting the Corporate
Secretarys office, 600 Albany Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee:
Roy W. Begley, Jr. (Chairman)
Ann Scavullo
John Q. Sherman, II
Certain Transactions
John Q. Sherman, a director of the Company, has represented A.
Rifkin Company as an independent manufacturers
representative since 1985. A. Rifkin Company supplies certain
security bag products to the banking industry. One of the
customers to which Mr. Sherman represented A. Rifkin
Company from 1985 to 2005 was The Fifth Third Bank (Fifth
Third). Fifth Thirds trust department holds shares
in the Company as disclosed in the Voting Securities and
Principal Holders table. Fifth Third was a customer of A.
Rifkin Company for many years prior to 1985, as well. In 2005,
A. Rifkin Companys revenue from Fifth Third was
approximately $177,000, on which Mr. Sherman received a
sales commission. In 2004, Mr. Sherman also began to
directly sell certain transfer cases to Fifth Third, under a
written agreement that runs through August 2007. In 2005, these
direct sales resulted in approximately $32,600 of gross revenue
to Mr. Sherman.
In October 2005, the Companys contracted with Fifth Third
to provide a broad range of services to Fifth Third, including
purchasing, inventory management, fulfillment, distribution and
other services in addition to its traditional role of supplying
printed materials. As part of this expanded relationship, the
Company assumed responsibility for sourcing and purchasing for
Fifth Third the products provided by both A. Rifkin Company and
Mr. Sherman. In late 2005, therefore, the Company began to
purchase these items from A. Rifkin Company and Mr. Sherman
for resale to Fifth Third. In future years, the resulting
revenues and commissions to Mr. Sherman from the Company
are expected to continue in approximately the same amounts.
The Company sells Fifth Third printed products, banking
documents, and services, in the ordinary course of business and
on terms and conditions similar to those offered other Company
customers.
16
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following performance graph presents our cumulative total
shareholder return on our common stock from December 31,
2000, to each of the years ending 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and
2005. Each years ending value is calculated as follows:
(i) the sum of
|
|
|
(a) the cumulative amount of dividends, assuming dividend
reinvestment during the periods presented, and |
|
|
(b) the difference between our share price at the end and
beginning of the periods presented
is divided by |
(ii) the share price at the beginning of the periods
presented.
The cumulative shareholder return is then compared with that for
a published industry index, and a broad equity market index.
The Company uses the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrial Index and
the S&P 500 Index. There were 106 companies in the S&P
600 Industrial Index on December 30, 2005, including
Standard Register.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
Standard Register
|
|
1.00
|
|
1.37
|
|
1.38
|
|
1.36
|
|
1.22
|
|
1.46
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
1.00
|
|
0.88
|
|
0.69
|
|
0.69
|
|
0.88
|
|
1.03
|
|
S&P SmallCap 600 Industrial
Index
|
|
1.00
|
|
1.04
|
|
.92
|
|
1.21
|
|
1.54
|
|
1.74
|
|
Independent Auditors
A representative of Battelle & Battelle, LLP, Certified
Public Accountants, and our auditors for 2005, will be present
at the annual meeting. The representative will have an
opportunity to make a statement to the shareholders and will be
available to respond to appropriate questions.
The board of directors does not intend to present any other
proposals for action by the shareholders at the annual meeting
and has not been informed that anyone else intends to present
any other proposal for action by the shareholders at the annual
meeting.
17
OTHER MATTERS
Solicitation Expenses
The Company will pay the costs to solicit proxies. These
costs include the expenses of brokers, custodians, nominees or
fiduciaries incurred in forwarding the documents to their
principals or beneficiaries. These are the only contemplated
expenses of solicitation.
Shareholder Proposals for 2007 Annual Meeting
Any proposal of a shareholder intended for inclusion in our
proxy statement and proxy for the 2007 annual meeting of
shareholders must be received by our Secretary at 600 Albany
Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408, on or before November 17, 2006.
The 2007 annual meeting of shareholders will be held on
April 26, 2007. The form of proxy we distribute for the
2007 annual meeting of shareholders may include discretionary
authority to vote on any matter which is presented to the
shareholders at the 2007 annual meeting (other than by
management) if we do not receive notice of that matter at 600
Albany Street, Dayton, Ohio 45408, prior to February 1,
2007.
|
|
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
Kathryn A. Lamme |
|
Vice President, General Counsel |
|
& Secretary |
|
Dayton, Ohio |
The Standard Register Company
Annual Meeting of
Shareholders
The Standard Register Company
600 Albany Street
Dayton, Ohio 45408
April 27, 2006
11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Savings Time
18
[STANDARD LOGO]
THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY
600 ALBANY STREET
DAYTON, OH 45408
|
|
|
AUTO DATA PROCESSING
INVESTOR COMM SERVICES
ATTENTION:
TEST PRINT
51 MERCEDES WAY
EDGEWOOD, NY
11717
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTE BY
INTERNET www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting
instructions and for electronic delivery of
information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the
day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have
your proxy card in hand when you access the web
site and follow the instructions to
obtain your records and to create an
electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC
DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by The Standard
Register Company in mailing proxy materials, you
can consent to receiving all future
proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports
electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To
sign up for electronic delivery, please follow
the instructions above to vote using the internet
and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to
receive or access shareholder communications
electronically in future years.
VOTE BY
MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it
in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or
return it to The Standard Register
Company, c/o ADP, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY
11717.
NAME
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
STANDARD REGISTER CO
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
123,456,789,012.12345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
STAND1
|
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS
PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
THE
STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY
Vote
On Directors
|
1. |
|
Election of Eight Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(01)
|
|
Roy W. Begley, Jr.
|
|
|
(05 |
) |
|
Dennis L. Rediker |
(02)
|
|
F. David Clarke, III
|
|
|
(06 |
) |
|
Ann Scavullo |
(03)
|
|
Paul H. Granzow
|
|
|
(07 |
) |
|
John J. Schiff, Jr. |
(04)
|
|
Sherrill W. Hudson
|
|
|
(08 |
) |
|
John Q. Sherman, II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
All
|
|
Withhold
All
|
|
For All
Except
|
|
To
withhold authority to vote, mark For All Except
and write the nominees number on the line below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
According to their best judgment on any and all matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. The Board
of Directors does not know of any other matter to be brought before the Annual Meeting other than the one described above. |
Mark box at right if address change/comments have
been noted on the reverse side of this
card.
AUTO DATA PROCESSING
INVESTOR COMM SERVICES
ATTENTION:
TEST PRINT
51 MERCEDES WAY
EDGEWOOD, NY
11717
Please
be sure to sign and date this Proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,456,789,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
853887107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY
Proxy for Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 27, 2006
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned, a shareholder of The Standard Register Company (the Company) hereby
appoints DENNIS L. REDIKER and PAUL H. GRANZOW (Appointed Proxies), each with full
power to substitute or act alone, to vote, cumulatively or otherwise
(the action of a majority of these present to control), with respect to all shares of stock of
the undersigned in the Company at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (Annual
Meeting) to be held April 27, 2006, and at any adjournments
thereof, upon the matters listed on the reverse side hereof.
THE APPOINTED PROXIES WILL VOTE FOR
THE MATTER SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE SIDE, WHICH IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT,
UNLESS A CONTRARY CHOICE IS SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, IN
WHICH CASE, THE APPOINTED PROXIES WILL VOTE OR WITHHOLD IN ACCORDANCE
WITH INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND
RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on the reverse side
hereof. Joint owners should each sign personally. Trustees and other fiduciaries should indicate
the capacity in which they sign, and where more than one name appears, a majority must
sign. If a corporation this signature should be that of an
authorized officer who should state his or her title. |
|
|
|
|
(IF YOU NOTED ANY ADDRESS CHANGE/COMMENTS ABOVE,
PLEASE CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX ON THE REVERSE SIDE.)