Edgar Filing: PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-28000

PRG-Schultz International, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Georgia		58-2213805
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

600 Galleria Parkway		30339-5986
Suite 100		(Zip Code)
Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (770) 779-3900

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer þ	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

Common shares of the registrant outstanding at July 31, 2008 were 21,844,841.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

INDEX


		Page No.

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements		1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007		1

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007		2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007		3

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		4

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		23

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		24

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		25

Item 1A. Risk Factors		25

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		25

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		25

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		25

Item 5. Other Information		25

Item 6. Exhibits		26

Signatures		28

EX-31.1 SECTION 302, CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302, CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-32.1 SECTION 906, CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO AND CFO

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
Revenues	$	49,648	$	53,315		$	97,911	$	110,345
Cost of revenues		32,941		34,872			63,193		72,113

Gross margin		16,707		18,443			34,718		38,232

Selling, general and administrative expenses		11,024		14,486			23,867		28,168
Operational restructuring expense (Note I)		—		—			—		—

Operating income		5,683		3,957			10,851		10,064


Interest expense, net		765		4,749			1,756		8,890
Loss on financial restructuring (Note H)		—		—			—		—

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations		4,918		(792	)		9,095		1,174
Income taxes		400		344			993		875


Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations		4,518		(1,136	)		8,102		299

Discontinued operations (Note B):
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—		19,687			—		19,775

Net earnings	$	4,518	$	18,551		$	8,102	$	20,074


Basic earnings (loss) per common share (Note C):
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.21	$	(0.15	)	$	0.37	$	0.00
Earnings from discontinued operations		—		2.17			—		2.26

Net earnings	$	0.21	$	2.02		$	0.37	$	2.26


Diluted earnings (loss) per common share (Note C):
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.20	$	(0.15	)	$	0.35	$	0.00
Earnings from discontinued operations		—		2.17			—		2.26

Net earnings	$	0.20	$	2.02		$	0.35	$	2.26


Weighted-average common shares outstanding (Note C ):
Basic		21,734		9,093			21,629		8,733

Diluted		22,942		9,093			22,823		8,733

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)


	June 30,
	2008			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note G)	$	20,152		$	42,364
Restricted cash		168			—
Receivables:
Contract receivables, less allowances of $718 in 2008 and $826 in 2007
Billed		23,959			30,251
Unbilled		5,510			6,440

		29,469			36,691

Employee advances and miscellaneous receivables, less allowances of $2,347 in 2008 and $1,831 in 2007		261			1,118

Total receivables		29,730			37,809

Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,611			2,676
Deferred income taxes		—			64

Total current assets		52,661			82,913

Property and equipment, at cost		40,973			41,148
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(33,426	)		(33,113	)

Property and equipment, net		7,547			8,035

Goodwill		4,600			4,600
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $9,830 in 2008 and $8,728 in 2007		20,070			21,172
Unbilled receivables		1,758			2,072
Deferred income taxes		20			279
Other assets		3,061			3,367

	$	89,717		$	122,438


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	12,144		$	16,117
Accrued payroll and related expenses		20,049			31,435
Refund liabilities		7,406			9,897
Deferred revenue		516			620
Current portions of debt obligations		5,297			7,846

Total current liabilities		45,412			65,915

Long term debt (Note H)		16,992			38,078
Noncurrent compensation obligations		8,373			8,548
Refund liabilities		1,012			1,676
Other long-term liabilities		5,433			5,872

Total liabilities		77,222			120,089

Shareholders’ equity (Notes D and H):
Common stock, no par value; $.01 stated value per share. Authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 22,421,294 in 2008 and 22,100,090 in 2007		224			221
Additional paid-in capital		608,435			605,592
Accumulated deficit		(550,916	)		(559,018	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,462			4,264
Treasury stock, at cost; 576,453 shares in 2008 and 2007		(48,710	)		(48,710	)

Total shareholders’ equity		12,495			2,349


Commitments and contingencies (Note I)	$	89,717		$	122,438

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	8,102		$	20,074
Earnings from discontinued operations		—			19,775

Earnings from continuing operations		8,102			299
Adjustments to reconcile earnings from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,716			3,564
Amortization of debt discount, premium and deferred loan costs		390			2,003
Stock-based compensation costs		4,584			5,429
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment		(5	)		223
Deferred income taxes		323			320
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(164	)		(34	)
Billed receivables		7,431			4,843
Unbilled receivables		1,244			2,096
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		108			(1,091	)
Other assets		(13	)		116
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(4,849	)		1,456
Accrued payroll and related expenses		(12,041	)		(11,980	)
Refund liabilities		(3,155	)		(376	)
Deferred revenue		(117	)		261
Noncurrent compensation obligations		(1,676	)		(437	)
Other long-term liabilities		(439	)		(255	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		2,439			6,437

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment, net of disposal proceeds		(1,102	)		(1,139	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,102	)		(1,139	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net repayments of debt		(23,635	)		(25,148	)
Payments for deferred loan cost		(59	)		(221	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(23,694	)		(25,369	)

Cash flows from discontinued operations:
Operating cash flows		—			(2,064	)
Investing cash flows		—			21,133

Net cash provided by discontinued operations		—			19,069


Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		145			356

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(22,212	)		(646	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		42,364			30,228

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,152		$	29,582


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1,955		$	7,670

Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds	$	1,311		$	482

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2008 and 2007

(Unaudited)

Note A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) of PRG-Schultz International, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.

Disclosures included herein pertain to the Company’s continuing operations unless otherwise noted.

For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2007 amounts to conform to the presentation in 2008. These reclassifications include the reclassification of the Company’s Meridian VAT reclaim (“Meridian”) business unit as discontinued operations (see Note B).

During the first quarter of 2008, management revised its estimation of expected refund rates. Such change in estimate resulted from a decline in actual refund rates observed during 2007. The impact of the change in estimate resulted in a $0.8 million reduction in the March 31, 2008 refund liability and a corresponding increase in first quarter 2008 revenues. The impact on the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was not significant and management does not expect that the change in estimate will have a material impact on future period results.

New Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

Level 1: quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets

Level 2: inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the instrument

Level 3: inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset or liability

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

Relative to SFAS 157, the FASB issued FASB Staff Positions (“FSP”) 157-1 and 157-2. FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions, while FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of the application of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, with the exception of the application of the statement to non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. Non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities for which the Company has not applied the provisions of SFAS 157 include those measured at fair value in goodwill and other intangible asset impairment testing. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008 included cash equivalents of $20.2 million which were valued based on Level 1 inputs and debt and capital lease obligations of $22.3 million which were valued based on Level 2 inputs. The Company did not have any assets valued based on Level 3 inputs.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). This standard permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also revises provisions of SFAS No. 115 that apply to available-for-sale and trading securities. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption by the Company of SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008 did not have any material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of a business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, SFAS No. 141(R) will have on its future financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, SFAS No. 160 will have on its future financial statements.

Note B – Discontinued Operations

The following table summarizes the components of earnings from discontinued operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):


	Three Months					Six Months
	Ended					Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
Revenues	$	—	$	7,505		$	—	$	17,386


Operating income		—		112			—		724
Gain on sale or disposal		—		19,460			—		19,460

		—		19,572			—		20,184
Income tax expense (benefit)		—		(115	)		—		409

Earnings from discontinued operations	$	—	$	19,687		$	—	$	19,775

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Substantially all the results from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 relate to the Meridian VAT reclaim business that was sold on May 30, 2007 to Averio Holdings Limited, a Dublin, Ireland based company affiliated with management of Meridian (“Averio”). Meridian had previously been reported as a separate reportable operating segment. Meridian’s operating results for all periods presented have been reclassified and are included in discontinued operations.

In addition to amounts already paid by Averio at the closing of the sale and on December 31, 2007, the sale agreement required Averio to pay the Company €1.5 million (Euros) each year on December 31, 2008 and 2009. However, the additional payments owed were contingent upon certain “place of supply” legislation remaining in effect in the European Union without amendment prior to the relevant payment date. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the place of supply legislation was amended and, as a result, Averio is not required to make the additional payments under the terms of the sale agreement.

Note C — Earnings Per Common Share

The following tables set forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
Basic earnings per common share:
Numerator for earnings per common share calculations:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	4,518	$	(1,136	)	$	8,102	$	299
Preferred dividends		—		(178	)		—		(336	)

Earnings (loss) for purposes of computing basic earnings per common share from continuing operations		4,518		(1,314	)		8,102		(37	)

Earnings from discontinued operations		—		19,687			—		19,775

Earnings for purposes of computing basic net earnings per common share	$	4,518	$	18,373		$	8,102	$	19,738


Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per common share – weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period		21,734		9,093			21,629		8,733


Basic earnings per common share:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.21	$	(0.15	)	$	0.37	$	0.00
Earnings from discontinued operations		—		2.17			—		2.26

Net earnings	$	0.21	$	2.02		$	0.37	$	2.26

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
Diluted earnings per common share:
Numerator for earnings per common share calculations:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	4,518	$	(1,136	)	$	8,102	$	299
Preferred dividends		—		(178	)		—		(336	)

Earnings (loss) for purposes of computing diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations		4,518		(1,314	)		8,102		(37	)

Earnings from discontinued operations		—		19,687			—		19,775

Earnings for purposes of computing diluted net earnings per common share	$	4,518	$	18,373		$	8,102	$	19,738


Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per common share – weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period		21,734		9,093			21,629		8,733
Incremental shares from stock-based compensation plans		1,208		—			1,194		—

Denominator for diluted earnings per common share		22,942		9,093			22,823		8,733


Diluted earnings per common share:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	0.20	$	(0.15	)	$	0.35	$	0.00
Earnings from discontinued operations		—		2.17			—		2.26

Net earnings	$	0.20	$	2.02		$	0.35	$	2.26

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, options to purchase 0.8 million shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their anti-dilutive effect as the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares during the periods. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, 0.6 million shares subject to outstanding stock options and 2006 Management Incentive Plan (“2006 MIP”) awards were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect to earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, 9.3 million shares and 9.5 million shares, respectively, related to the senior convertible notes were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect to earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, 3.0 million shares and 3.2 million shares, respectively, related to the Series A convertible preferred stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect to earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations.

Note D – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company currently has three stock-based compensation plans under which awards have been granted: (1) the Stock Incentive Plan, (2) the 2006 MIP, and (3) the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 EIP”). The Stock Incentive Plan and 2006 MIP are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

During the first quarter of 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2008 EIP, which was approved by the shareholders at the annual meeting of the shareholders on May 29, 2008. The 2008 EIP authorizes the grant of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other incentive awards. 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2008 EIP pursuant to award grants to key employees, directors and service providers.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

On May 29, 2008, non-qualified stock options were granted under the 2008 EIP to each of the Company’s five non-employee Directors to purchase an aggregate of 60,135 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $9.87, the grant date closing price of the Company’s common stock on NASDAQ. The options vest in full upon the earlier of (i) May 29, 2009 and (ii) the date of, and immediately prior to, the Company’s 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, provided the director has been continuously serving as a member of the Board from the date of grant until the earlier of such times. In addition, the options will become 100% vested upon a change of control. Unvested options are forfeited when a director leaves the Board. The options terminate on May 28, 2015, except that vested options held by a director who leaves the Board before a change of control will terminate three years after termination of Board service, if such date occurs before May 28, 2015.

On May 29, 2008, nonvested stock awards (restricted stock) representing 25,325 shares in aggregate of the Company’s common stock were granted to the Company’s non-employee Directors pursuant to the Company’s 2008 EIP. These restricted stock grants had an aggregate grant date fair value of $0.2 million. The shares of restricted stock will vest upon the earlier of (i) May 29, 2009, and (ii) the date of, and immediately prior to, the Company’s 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, provided the director has been continuously serving as a member of the Board from the date of grant until the earlier of such times. In addition, the shares will become 100% vested upon a change of control. Unvested shares of restricted stock will be forfeited when a director leaves the Board. The shares are generally nontransferable until vesting. During the vesting period, the award recipients will be entitled to receive dividends with respect to the nonvested shares and to vote the shares.

During the first quarter of 2007, one senior officer of the Company was granted 20,000 Performance Units under the 2006 MIP. The award had a grant date fair value of $0.3 million and vests ratably over four years. No other awards were granted during the first six months of 2007 under the Company’s incentive plans and no options were exercised.

During the first six months of 2007, Performance Units outstanding under the 2006 MIP increased by 233,165 as a result of anti-dilution adjustments which occur automatically pursuant to the terms of the 2006 MIP as the Company’s convertible securities converted into common stock. As of June 30, 2007, a total of 1,047,540 Performance Units were outstanding, 770,934 of which were vested.

As of June 30, 2008, a total of 1,767,723 Performance Units were outstanding, 1,735,940 of which were vested. On April 30, 2008, an aggregate of 493,137 Performance Units were settled by six executive officers. Such settlements resulted in the issuance of 295,879 shares of common stock and cash payments totaling $2.0 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 include $1.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related to stock-based compensation charges. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 include $4.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively, related to stock-based compensation charges. At June 30, 2008, there was $4.5 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock awards and 2006 MIP Performance Unit awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

Note E - Operating Segments and Related Information

The Company is comprised of the following reportable operating segments:

Domestic Accounts Payable Services

The Domestic Accounts Payable Services segment represents business conducted in the United States of America (“USA”).

International Accounts Payable Services

The International Accounts Payable Services segment represents business conducted in countries other than the USA.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Corporate Support

The Company includes the unallocated portion of corporate selling, general and administrative expenses not specifically attributable to the Accounts Payable Services segments in a category referred to as corporate support.

Management evaluates the performance of its operating segments based upon revenues and measures of profit or loss it refers to as EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) adjusted for restructuring charges, stock-based compensation, intangible asset impairment charges and severance charges viewed by management as individually or collectively significant. The Company does not have any inter-segment revenues. Segment information for continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 follows (in thousands):


	Domestic		International
	Accounts		Accounts
	Payable		Payable		Corporate
	Services		Services		Support			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Revenues	$	28,280	$	21,368	$	¾		$	49,648


EBITDA	$	8,759	$	3,118	$	(4,879	)	$	6,998
Stock-based compensation		¾		¾		1,550			1,550

Adjusted EBITDA	$	8,759	$	3,118	$	(3,329	)	$	8,548


Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues	$	32,695	$	20,620	$	¾		$	53,315


EBITDA	$	10,257	$	2,601	$	(7,348	)	$	5,510
Stock-based compensation		¾		¾		2,695			2,695

Adjusted EBITDA	$	10,257	$	2,601	$	(4,653	)	$	8,205


Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Revenues	$	56,494	$	41,417	$	¾		$	97,911


EBITDA	$	18,143	$	6,902	$	(11,478	)	$	13,567
Stock-based compensation		¾		¾		4,584			4,584

Adjusted EBITDA	$	18,143	$	6,902	$	(6,894	)	$	18,151


Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues	$	69,699	$	40,646	$	¾		$	110,345


EBITDA	$	23,279	$	4,952	$	(14,603	)	$	13,628
Stock-based compensation		¾		¾		5,429			5,429

Adjusted EBITDA	$	23,279	$	4,952	$	(9,174	)	$	19,057

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table reconciles earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations	$	4,518	$	(1,136	)	$	8,102	$	299

Income taxes		400		344			993		875
Interest, net		765		4,749			1,756		8,890
Depreciation and amortization		1,315		1,553			2,716		3,564

EBITDA		6,998		5,510			13,567		13,628

Stock-based compensation		1,550		2,695			4,584		5,429

Adjusted EBITDA	$	8,548	$	8,205		$	18,151	$	19,057

The composition and presentation of segment information as presented above differs from the composition and presentation of such information as previously reported. Segment information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 has been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.

Note F – Comprehensive Income

The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. This Statement establishes items that are required to be recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income. SFAS No. 130 requires, among other things, that an enterprise report a total for comprehensive income in condensed financial statements of interim periods issued to shareholders. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s consolidated comprehensive income was $4.3 million and $19.8 million, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s consolidated comprehensive income was $6.9 million and $21.5 million, respectively. The difference between consolidated comprehensive income, as disclosed here, and traditionally determined consolidated net earnings, as set forth on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited), results from foreign currency translation adjustments.

Note G - Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, certain investments may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit.

At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $20.2 million and $42.4 million, respectively, of which cash equivalents represent approximately $14.9 million and $37.0 million, respectively. The Company had $13.9 million and $36.7 million in cash equivalents at U.S. banks at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, certain of the Company’s international subsidiaries held $1.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in temporary investments. Most of the temporary investments held by international subsidiaries at June 30, 2008 were held in Canada.

Note H - Long Term Debt

Total debt outstanding at June 30, 2008 was $22.3 million and included a $21.6 million outstanding balance on a variable rate term loan due 2011 and a $0.7 million capital lease obligation.

The Company reduced the balance on its term loan by $22.2 million during the first quarter of 2008. This reduction included $7.2 million of mandatory payments as well as a voluntary payment of $15 million. In March

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

2008, the Company completed an amendment of its credit facility, permitting the Company to make the $15 million voluntary pre-payment of the term loan without penalty and increasing the borrowing capacity under the revolver portion of the facility by $10 million. At June 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver portion of the Company’s credit facility.

During the first quarter of 2007, 19,249 shares of Series A preferred stock and $0.6 million in principal amount of senior convertible notes were converted into 945,028 shares of common stock. During the second quarter of 2007, 6,413 shares of Series A preferred stock and $5.9 million in principal amount of senior convertible notes were converted into 1,199,089 shares of common stock.

During the first quarter of 2007, the Company repaid $9.6 million of its term loan. During the second quarter of 2007, the Company repaid the remaining $15.4 million balance of the term loan. Upon the full satisfaction of the term loan, the Company recognized a $1.1 million charge related to unamortized deferred loan costs associated with the term loan. Such charge is included in interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.

Note I - Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

On April 1, 2003, Fleming Companies, one of the Company’s larger U.S. Accounts Payable Services clients at the time, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company received approximately $5.6 million in payments on account from Fleming. On January 24, 2005, the Company received a demand from the Fleming Post Confirmation Trust (“PCT”), a trust which was created pursuant to Fleming’s Chapter 11 reorganization plan to represent the client, for preference payments received by the Company. The demand stated that the PCT’s calculation of the preferential payments was approximately $2.9 million. The Company disputed the claim. Later in 2005, the PCT filed suit against the Company seeking to recover approximately $5.6 million in payments that were made to the Company by Fleming during the 90 days preceding Fleming’s bankruptcy filing, and that are alleged to be avoidable either as preferences or fraudulent transfers under the Bankruptcy Code. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to certain of the PCT’s claims in the proceeding. In December 2005, the PCT offered to settle the case for $2 million. The Company countered with an offer to waive its bankruptcy claim and to pay the PCT $250,000. The PCT rejected the Company’s settlement offer, and although the parties are engaged in efforts to resolve the dispute informally and have agreed to settlement mediation, the litigation is ongoing.

In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in and subject to other claims, contractual disputes and other uncertainties. Management, after reviewing with legal counsel all of these actions and proceedings, believes that the aggregate losses, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Retirement Obligations

The July 31, 2005 retirements of the Company’s former Chairman, President and CEO, John M. Cook, and the Company’s former Vice Chairman, John M. Toma, resulted in an obligation to pay retirement benefits of approximately $7.6 million (present value basis) to be paid in monthly cash installments principally over a three-year period, beginning February 1, 2006. On March 16, 2006, the terms of the applicable severance agreements were amended in conjunction with the Company’s financial restructuring. Pursuant to the terms of the severance agreements, as amended (1) the Company’s obligations to pay monthly cash installments to Mr. Cook and Mr. Toma were extended from 36 months to 58 months and from 24 months to 46 months, respectively; however, the total dollar amount of monthly cash payments to be made to each remained unchanged, and (2) the Company agreed to pay a fixed sum of $150,000 to defray the fees and expenses of the legal counsel and financial advisors to Messrs. Cook and Toma. The original severance agreements, and the severance agreements, as amended, also provide for an annual reimbursement, beginning on or about February 1, 2007, to Mr. Cook and Mr. Toma for the cost of health insurance for themselves and their respective spouses (not to exceed $25,000 and $20,000, respectively, subject to adjustment based on changes in the Consumer Price Index), continuing until each reaches the age of 80. At June 30, 2008, accrued payroll and related expenses and noncurrent compensation obligations include $1.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to these obligations.

Operational Restructuring Obligations

In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company incurred various costs, principally severance and early lease termination costs, associated with an operational restructuring plan. No costs incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 or 2007 were classified and reported by the Company as operational restructuring expenses. However, payments related to previously accrued restructuring obligations will continue into future years. As of June 30, 2008, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities include $0.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively, related to operating leases terminated or exited early.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

Prior to the second quarter of 2007, the Company conducted its operations through two reportable operating segments, Accounts Payable Services and Meridian VAT Reclaim (“Meridian”). On May 30, 2007, the Company sold its Meridian business to Averio Holdings Limited, a Dublin, Ireland based company affiliated with management of Meridian (“Averio”). Meridian’s operating results for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified and are now reported in discontinued operations. Unless stated otherwise, the discussion which follows pertains solely to the Company’s continuing operations.

Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company segregated Accounts Payable Services into two reportable operating segments – Domestic and International. The Domestic and International Accounts Payable Services segments principally consist of services that entail the review of client accounts payable disbursements to identify and recover overpayments. These operating segments include accounts payable services provided to retailers and wholesale distributors (the Company’s historical client base) and accounts payable and other services provided to various other types of business entities and governmental agencies, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). The Company conducts business in North America, South America, Europe, Australia and Asia.

The Company’s revenues are based on specific contracts with its clients. Such contracts generally specify: (a) time periods covered by the audit; (b) the nature and extent of audit services to be provided by the Company; (c) the client’s duties in assisting and cooperating with the Company; and (d) fees payable to the Company, generally expressed as a specified percentage of the amounts recovered by the client resulting from overpayment claims identified. Clients generally recover claims by either taking credits against outstanding payables or future purchases from the involved vendors, or receiving refund checks directly from those vendors. The manner in which a claim is recovered by a client is often dictated by industry practice. In addition, many clients establish client-specific procedural guidelines that the Company must satisfy prior to submitting claims for client approval. For some services provided by the Company, client contracts provide for compensation to the Company in the form of a flat fee or a rate per hour or per unit of usage for the rendering of that service.

Medicare

On March 29, 2005, the Company announced that CMS, the federal agency that administers the Medicare program, awarded the Company a contract to provide recovery audit services for the State of California’s Medicare spending. The contract was awarded as part of a demonstration program by CMS to recover overpayments and underpayments through the use of recovery auditing. The three-year contract was effective on March 28, 2005 and expired on March 27, 2008. To fully address the range of payment recovery opportunities under the CMS demonstration project contract, the Company sub-contracted with Concentra Preferred Systems, Inc., a business unit of Concentra Network Services, now Viant, Inc. (“Viant”), the nation’s largest provider of specialized cost containment services for the healthcare industry, to add Viant’s clinical experience to the Company’s expertise in recovery audit services.

The Company began to incur capital expenditures and employee compensation costs primarily related to the CMS demonstration project contract in 2005. Such capital expenditures and employee compensation costs continued to be incurred throughout 2006 and 2007 as the Company continued to build this business. During the second quarter of 2007, the Company’s CMS demonstration project contract was amended to include recovery audit services for the State of Arizona’s Medicare spending, although the Company never received any Arizona Medicare data to audit. Revenues from the auditing of Medicare payments made in California made a small contribution to the Company’s overall revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as a result of the expiration of the contract. Pursuant to the Company’s agreement with CMS, there will be no additional revenues to the Company or repayments to CMS relating to the CMS demonstration project contract.

In late 2006, legislation was enacted that mandated that recovery auditing of Medicare be extended beyond the March 2008 end of the demonstration project and that CMS enter into additional contracts with recovery audit contractors to expand recovery auditing of Medicare spending to all 50 states by January 1, 2010. On October 19, 2007, CMS issued a Request for Proposal (“RFP”), which included a deadline for response of no later than

November 19, 2007, and a planned initial rollout beginning April 1, 2008. The RFP contains certain terms that are significantly different from the terms that were applicable to the Medicare recovery audit demonstration project. For instance, the RFP requires participating recovery audit contractors to repay to CMS the contingency fee associated with any claim that is subsequently overturned at any level of appeal. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the Medicare recovery audit program, it is difficult to assess the overall impact of the proposed national rollout of recovery auditing of Medicare spending on the Company’s business. Nevertheless, management believes that, should it participate in the national rollout of Medicare auditing, the Company will have the opportunity to continue and expand its Medicare audit recovery business. However, the continuation and expansion of the Company’s Medicare recovery audit services is subject to numerous risks and variables, including the timing, terms and rollout schedule of the national expansion by CMS and changes in the political, legislative and regulatory environment. For example, on November 7, 2007, CMS significantly modified the RFP to, among other things, introduce provisions which limit the scope of the Medicare payments to be reviewed by participating recovery audit contractors to those made on or after October 1, 2007. The amendment also extended the deadline for response to the RFP. The Company submitted its proposal responding to the RFP on December 14, 2007, before the applicable deadline. To date, CMS has not announced its preferred recovery audit contractors for the four regions to be covered by new contracts. The Company will not have Medicare audit revenues for up to nine months after the new recovery audit contracts are awarded, if ever, and although management has taken steps to reduce its costs associated with its Medicare audit capabilities, the Company continues to incur significant expenses to maintain those capabilities in anticipation of the national rollout.

CMS’s recovery audit contractor program is designed, among other things, to recover improper payments made to healthcare providers such as hospitals and physicians’ practices. These providers, both individually and collectively through provider associations, have sought and will likely continue to seek to end or severely limit this legislatively mandated program. The recovery audit program generally and recovery audit contractors, including the Company, have been and will likely continue to be the subject of complaints by health care providers and their associations, and efforts, including political pressures, to end or limit CMS’s recovery audit program are likely to continue for the foreseeable future. These complaints and pressures could lead to additional program changes and limitations or to the discontinuation of CMS’s recovery audit program entirely. As an example of the impact of such efforts and pressures, on November 8, 2007, legislation was introduced in Congress proposing a one year halt to CMS’s recovery audit program and calling for an assessment of the program by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. To date, such legislation has not been passed. Although it is difficult to assess the prospects for the success of any particular legislative or other effort to limit or end the recovery audit program at this time, management believes that opposition efforts are likely to continue as long as the program is successful at recovering meaningful amounts of improper payments made to healthcare providers.

Despite the end to the Medicare recovery audit demonstration project on March 27, 2008 and the uncertainties inherent in the Medicare recovery audit program, generally, including those relating to the rollout of the program to all 50 states as mandated by Congress, management believes it has an opportunity to significantly expand its Medicare audit recovery business if it participates in the national rollout.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies have been fully described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Certain of these accounting policies are considered “critical” to the portrayal of the Company’s financial position and results of operations, as they require the application of significant judgment by management. As a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These “critical” accounting policies are identified and discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those considered “critical”. The development, selection and evaluation of accounting estimates, including those deemed “critical,” and the associated disclosures in this Form 10-Q have been discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

New Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

Level 1: quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets

Level 3: inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable for the asset or liability

noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company has not determined the impact, if any, SFAS No. 160 will have on its future financial statements.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the percentage of revenues represented by certain items in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the periods indicated:


	Three Months						Six Months
	Ended						Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of revenues		66.4			65.4			64.5			65.4

Gross margin		33.6			34.6			35.5			34.6

Selling, general and administrative expenses		22.2			27.2			24.4			25.5

Operating income		11.4			7.4			11.1			9.1

Interest expense, net		1.5			8.9			1.8			8.0

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations		9.9			(1.5	)		9.3			1.1

Income taxes		0.8			0.6			1.0			0.8

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before discontinued operations		9.1			(2.1	)		8.3			0.3

Earnings from discontinued operations		¾			36.9			¾			17.9


Net earnings		9.1	%		34.8	%		8.3	%		18.2	%

Earnings from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 includes the gain recognized on the sale of Meridian (36.5% and 17.6% of revenue, respectively). See “Discontinued Operations” below.

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to the Corresponding Periods of the Prior Year

Accounts Payable Services

Revenues. Domestic and International Accounts Payable Services revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months				Six Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Domestic Accounts Payable Services revenues	$	28.3	$	32.7	$	56.5	$	69.7
International Accounts Payable Services revenues		21.3		20.6		41.4		40.6

Total Accounts Payable Services revenues	$	49.6	$	53.3	$	97.9	$	110.3

For the three months ended June 30, 2008 total Domestic and International Accounts Payable Services revenues decreased by approximately 6.9% compared to the same period in 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 total Domestic and International Accounts Payable Services revenues decreased by approximately 11.2% compared to the same period in 2007. Domestic Accounts Payable Services revenues include any revenues generated from the Medicare recovery audit contract. The year over year decline in Domestic Accounts Payable Services revenues is consistent with the Company’s general trend of declining revenues from the past several years; however, the rate of the year over year decline for the three months ended June 30, 2008 is lower than the historical trend. Management believes that the trend of declining year over year Domestic Accounts Payable Services revenues is related to several factors, including fewer claims being processed as a result of improved client processes and the impact of the Company’s clients developing and strengthening their own internal audit capabilities as a substitute for the Company’s services. Furthermore, the Company has observed that with the passage of time numerous clients make fewer transaction errors as a result of the training and methodologies provided by the Company as part of the Company’s accounts payable recovery process. These trends are expected to continue, and as a result, revenues from the Domestic Accounts Payable Services segment are likely to decline for the foreseeable future. In addition, the end of the CMS demonstration project in the first quarter of 2008 also contributed to the decline in Domestic Accounts Payable Services year over year revenues for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008. Revenues in the International Accounts Payable business for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 were essentially unchanged from revenues from the same periods in 2007 after consideration of the impacts of currency translation.

The Company intends to maximize the value it delivers to its existing clients by identifying and auditing new categories of potential errors. The Company also intends to increase its emphasis on using its technology and professional experience to assist its clients in achieving objectives that do not directly involve recovery of past overpayments. These objectives are related to such things as transaction accuracy and compliance, managing trade and vendor promotional programs, purchasing effectiveness, M&A due diligence analysis, and processing efficiency in the procure-to-pay value chain.

In addition, the Company intends to continue to focus on its business within the health care industry and assuming it participates in the proposed expansion of Medicare recovery auditing to all 50 states, particularly its Medicare recovery audit services. See “Medicare” above.

Cost of Revenues (“COR”). COR consists principally of commissions paid or payable to the Company’s auditors based primarily upon the level of overpayment recoveries, and compensation paid to various types of hourly workers and salaried operational managers. Also included in COR are other direct costs incurred by these personnel, including rental of non-headquarters offices, travel and entertainment, telephone, utilities, maintenance and supplies and clerical assistance. A significant portion of the components comprising COR for the Company’s Domestic Accounts Payable Services operations are variable and will increase or decrease with increases and decreases in revenues. The COR support bases for domestic retail and domestic commercial operations are not separately distinguishable and are not evaluated by management individually. The Company’s International Accounts Payable Services also have a portion of their COR, although less than Domestic Accounts Payable Services, that will vary

with revenues. The lower variability is due to the predominant use of salaried auditor compensation plans in most emerging-market countries.

Accounts Payable Services COR for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months				Six Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Domestic Accounts Payable Services COR	$	16.8	$	19.0	$	32.5	$	40.8
International Accounts Payable Services COR		16.2		15.9		30.8		31.3

Total Accounts Payable Services COR	$	33.0	$	34.9	$	63.3	$	72.1

COR as a percentage of revenues increased to 66.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 65.4% for the same period in 2007. The increase in the Company’s COR as a percentage of revenue is primarily related to the continuation of the costs of its Medicare related infrastructure without corresponding revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, COR decreased to 64.5% compared to 65.4% for the same period in 2007. The improvement in COR for both the Domestic and International Accounts Payable Services for the 2008 six-month period relative to the prior year period was primarily related to the Company’s ongoing strategy of focusing its efforts and resources on its largest clients while exiting its smaller unprofitable clients. The execution of this strategy continues to have a positive impact on gross margin as a percentage of revenue.

As noted above, the Company continues to incur significant expenses to maintain its Medicare audit capabilities in anticipation of the national rollout of Medicare recovery auditing to all 50 states as previously disclosed and discussed above. Management continues to evaluate and make adjustments to expenditures that support its Medicare recovery auditing capabilities in light of the latest information and developments associated with the proposed national rollout and the Company’s possible participation in that program.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”). SG&A expenses include the expenses of sales and marketing activities, information technology services and the corporate data center, human resources, legal, accounting, administration, currency translation, headquarters-related depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of intangibles with finite lives. Due to the relatively fixed nature of the Company’s SG&A expenses, these expenses as a percentage of revenues can vary markedly period to period based on fluctuations in revenues.

Accounts Payable Services SG&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows (in millions):


	Three Months				Six Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Domestic Accounts Payable Services SG&A	$	4.0	$	4.9	$	8.3	$	8.5
International Accounts Payable Services SG&A		2.2		2.3		4.1		5.1

Total Accounts Payable Services SG&A	$	6.2	$	7.2	$	12.4	$	13.6

SG&A expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased by $1.0 million for the Company’s Accounts Payable Services operations, when compared to the same period of 2007. As a percentage of revenue, Accounts Payable Services SG&A expenses were 12.5% compared to 13.5% for the same period in 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, Accounts Payable Services SG&A expenses decreased by $1.2 million and as a percentage of revenue were 12.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 12.3% for the same period ended June 30, 2007. The reduction in total Accounts Payable Services SG&A was primarily the result of reducing the number of clients served, reducing the number of countries in which the Company operates, reducing headcount, and otherwise diligently managing the operating expenses of the business.

Corporate Support

SG&A. Corporate Support SG&A expenses include the expenses of sales and marketing activities, information technology services associated with the corporate data center, human resources, legal, accounting, administration, currency translation, stock-based compensation, headquarters-related depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of intangibles with finite lives. Corporate Support represents the unallocated portion of corporate SG&A expenses not specifically attributable to Domestic or International Accounts Payable Services and totaled the following for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions):


	Three Months				Six Months
	Ended				Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Corporate Support SG&A	$	4.8	$	7.3	$	11.4	$	14.6

Corporate Support SG&A expenses include stock-based compensation charges of $1.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Excluding such charges, Corporate Support SG&A decreased by $1.4 million, or 30.4%, in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, Corporate Support SG&A expenses included stock-based compensation charges of $4.6 million and $5.4 million respectively. Excluding such charges, Corporate Support SG&A decreased by $2.4 million, or 26.1%, in the first half of 2008 compared to the first half of 2007. These reductions in costs primarily related to payroll, occupancy, insurance, professional fees, and other miscellaneous expenses.

Discontinued Operations

Substantially all the results from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 relate to Meridian which was sold on May 30, 2007 to Averio. Meridian had previously been reported as a separate reportable operating segment. Meridian’s operating results for all periods presented have been reclassified and are included in discontinued operations.

Other Items

Interest Expense. Net interest expense was $0.8 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net interest expense was $1.8 million and $8.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These decreases in interest expense resulted from the conversions to common stock of the Company’s senior convertible notes that occurred throughout 2007 and the October 2007 redemption of all the then-outstanding balances of the Company’s senior notes and senior convertible notes. Interest expense in the second quarter of 2008 primarily related to the term loan under the Company’s senior credit facility with an outstanding balance of $21.6 million as of June 30, 2008.

Income Tax Expense. The Company’s effective income tax expense rates as indicated in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) do not reflect amounts that would normally be expected because of the Company’s valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Reported income tax expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 primarily results from taxes on income of foreign subsidiaries.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $20.2 million, and no borrowings under the revolver portion of its senior credit facility. This compares to the Company’s $42.4 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents resulted from numerous factors. First, during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company reduced the balance of its term loan by $22.2 million. This amount included $7.2 million of mandatory payments as well as a voluntary payment of $15.0 million. During that same period, the Company also completed an amendment of its credit facility, permitting the $15.0 million pre-payment without penalty and increasing the borrowing capacity under the revolver portion of its facility by $10 million. Additionally during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company paid annual management bonuses related to and accrued for in 2007 of approximately $7.2 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008 the Company paid a mandatory principal payment of $1.2 million on its term loan, and approximately $2.0 million related to the cash portion of the MIP Performance Units that were settled in April 2008. Finally, during the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made interest payments of $2.0 million related to its term loan.

Net cash used in investing activities in each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1.1 million. Cash used in investing activities was attributable to capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sales of assets.

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $23.7 million compared to $25.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. As mentioned above, $23.4 million of the net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was related to paying down the principal amount of the term loan. The net use of cash during the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily related to repayments of debt.

Management believes that the Company will have sufficient borrowing capacity and cash generated from operations to fund its capital and operational needs for at least the next twelve months; however, current projections reflect that the Company’s core Accounts Payable Services business will continue to decline. Therefore, the Company must continue to successfully manage its expenses and grow its other business lines in order to stabilize and increase revenues and improve profitability.

Executive Severance Payments

The July 31, 2005 retirements of the Company’s former Chairman, President and CEO, John M. Cook, and the Company’s former Vice Chairman, John M. Toma, resulted in an obligation to pay retirement benefits of $7.6 million to be paid in monthly cash installments principally over a three-year period, beginning February 1, 2006. On March 16, 2006, the terms of the applicable severance agreements were amended in conjunction with the Company’s financial restructuring. Pursuant to the terms of the severance agreements, as amended (1) the Company’s obligations to pay monthly cash installments to Mr. Cook and Mr. Toma have been extended from 36 months to 58 months and from 24 months to 46 months, respectively; however, the total dollar amount of monthly cash payments to be made to each remains unchanged, and (2) the Company agreed to pay a fixed sum of $150,000 to defray the fees and expenses of the legal counsel and financial advisors to Messrs. Cook and Toma. The original severance agreements, and the severance agreements, as amended, also provide for an annual reimbursement, beginning on or about February 1, 2007, to Mr. Cook and Mr. Toma for the cost of health insurance for themselves and their respective spouses (not to exceed $25,000 and $20,000, respectively, subject to adjustment based on changes in the Consumer Price Index), continuing until each reaches the age of 80. At June 30, 2008, the Company’s accrued payroll and related expenses and noncurrent compensation obligations include $1.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to these obligations.

Bankruptcy Litigation

On April 1, 2003, Fleming Companies, one of the Company’s larger U.S. Accounts Payable Services clients at the time filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company received approximately $5.6 million in payments on account from Fleming. On January 24, 2005, the Company received a demand from the Fleming Post Confirmation Trust (“PCT”), a trust which was created pursuant to Fleming’s Chapter 11 reorganization plan to represent the client, for preference payments received by the Company.

The demand stated that the PCT’s calculation of the preferential payments was approximately $2.9 million. The Company disputed the claim. Later in 2005, the PCT filed suit against the Company seeking to recover approximately $5.6 million in payments that were made to the Company by Fleming during the 90 days preceding Fleming’s bankruptcy filing, and that are alleged to be avoidable either as preferences or fraudulent transfers under the Bankruptcy Code. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to certain of the PCT’s claims in the proceeding. In December 2005, the PCT offered to settle the case for $2 million. The Company countered with an offer to waive its bankruptcy claim and to pay the PCT $250,000. The PCT rejected the Company’s settlement offer, and although the parties are engaged in efforts to resolve the dispute informally and have agreed to settlement mediation, the litigation is ongoing.

Secured Credit Facility

In September 2007, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit facility with Ableco LLC (“Ableco”) consisting of a $20 million revolving credit facility and a $45 million term loan which was funded in October 2007. The principal portion of the $45 million term loan with Ableco must be repaid in quarterly installments of $1.2 million each commencing in April 2008. The loan agreement also requires an annual mandatory prepayment contingently payable based on an excess cash flow calculation as defined in the agreement. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company reduced the balance on its term loan by $22.2 million. This reduction included $7.2 million of mandatory payments as well as a voluntary payment of $15.0 million. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company completed an amendment of its credit facility, permitting the $15.0 million pre-payment without penalty and increasing the borrowing capacity under the revolver portion of its facility by $10 million. An additional $1.2 million was repaid during the second quarter of 2008 as required under the terms of the term loan.

The remaining balance of the term loan is due in September 2011. Interest is payable monthly and accrues at the Company’s option at either prime plus 1.75% or at LIBOR plus 4.5%, but under either option may not be less than 9.75%. Interest on outstanding balances under the revolving credit facility, if any, will accrue at the Company’s option at either prime or at LIBOR plus 2%. The Company must also pay a commitment fee of 0.5% per annum, payable monthly, on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

The credit facility is guaranteed by each of the Company’s direct and indirect domestic wholly owned subsidiaries and certain of its foreign subsidiaries and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets (including the stock of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and two-thirds of the stock of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries). The credit facility will mature on September 17, 2011.

Stock Repurchase Program

In February 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase program. Under the terms of the program, the Company may repurchase up to $10 million of its common stock from time to time through March 30, 2009. The timing and amount of repurchases, if any, will depend upon the Company’s stock price, economic and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and other corporate considerations. No repurchases were made during the first six months of 2008.

2006 Management Incentive Plan

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on August 11, 2006, the shareholders of the Company approved a proposal granting authorization to issue up to 2.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock under the Company’s 2006 Management Incentive Plan (“2006 MIP”). On September 29, 2006, an aggregate of 682,301 Performance Units were awarded under the 2006 MIP to the seven executive officers of the Company. At Performance Unit settlement dates (which vary by participant), participants are paid in common stock and in cash. Participants will receive a number of shares of Company common stock equal to 60% of the number of Performance Units being paid out, plus a cash payment equal to 40% of the fair market value of that number of shares of common stock equal to the number of Performance Units being paid out. On March 28, 2007, an additional executive officer of the Company was granted 20,000 Performance Units under the 2006 MIP. The awards contain certain anti-dilution and change of control provisions. Also, the number of Performance Units awarded were automatically adjusted on a pro-rata basis upon the conversion into common stock of the Company’s senior convertible notes and

Series A convertible preferred stock. During 2006 and 2007, an additional 1,558,557 Performance Units were granted as a result of this automatic adjustment provision.

All Performance Units must be settled before April 30, 2016. As of March 31, 2008, a total of 2,260,858 Performance Unit awards were outstanding with an aggregate intrinsic value of $19.8 million. On April 30, 2008, an aggregate of 493,137 Performance Units were settled by six executive officers. Such settlements resulted in the issuance of 295,879 shares of common stock and cash payments totaling $2.0 million.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2008, the Company did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

Forward Looking Statements

Some of the information in this Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which look forward in time and involve substantial risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, (1) statements that contain projections of the Company’s future results of operations or of the Company’s financial condition, (2) statements regarding the adequacy of the Company’s current working capital and other available sources of funds, (3) statements regarding goals and plans for the future, (4) statements regarding the potential impact and outcome of the Company’s exploration of strategic alternatives, (5) expectations regarding future accounts payable services revenue trends, (6) the anticipated impact of Medicare recovery audit services on the Company’s business, and (7) statements regarding the impact of potential legislative and regulatory changes. All statements that cannot be assessed until the occurrence of a future event or events should be considered forward-looking. These statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue” or similar words. Risks and uncertainties that may potentially impact these forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those set forth under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

There may be events in the future, however, that the Company cannot accurately predict or over which the Company has no control. The risks and uncertainties listed in this section, as well as any cautionary language in this Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events denoted above as risks and uncertainties and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency Market Risk. Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar although we transact business in various foreign locations and currencies. As a result, our financial results could be significantly affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates, or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets in which we provide services. Our operating results are exposed to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the currencies of the other countries in which we operate. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against other currencies, the value of nonfunctional currency revenues decreases. When the U.S. dollar weakens, the functional currency amount of revenues increases. Overall, we are a net receiver of currencies other than the U.S. dollar and, as such, benefit from a weaker dollar. We are therefore adversely affected by a stronger dollar relative to major currencies worldwide. Given the number of variables involved in calculating our revenues and expenses derived from currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including multiple currencies and fluctuating transaction volumes, the Company believes that it cannot provide a quantitative analysis of the impact of hypothetical changes in foreign currency exchange rates that would be meaningful to investors.

Interest Rate Risk. Our interest income and expense are sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. In this regard, changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on our cash equivalents as well as interest paid on our debt. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $20.0 million available under its revolving credit facility and $21.6 million outstanding under the term loan. The interest rate on outstanding revolving credit loans is based on a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.0% (or, at our option, a published prime lending rate). At June 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility. However, assuming full utilization of the revolving credit facility, a hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates applicable to the revolver would result in an approximate $0.2 million change in annual pre-tax income. Interest on the term loan accrues at the Company’s option at either prime plus 1.75% or at LIBOR plus 4.5%. A hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates applicable to the term loan would result in an approximate $0.2 million change in annual pre-tax income.

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company estimates the fair value of awards of restricted shares and nonvested shares, as defined in SFAS 123(R), as being equal to the market value of the common stock. Also, under SFAS 123(R), companies must classify their share-based payments as either liability-classified awards or as equity-classified awards. Liability-classified awards are remeasured to fair value at each balance sheet date until the award is settled. The Company has classified its share-based payments that are settled in cash as liability-classified awards. The liability for liability-classified awards is generally equal to the fair value of the award as of the balance sheet date times the percentage vested at the time. The change in the liability amount from one balance sheet date to another is charged (or credited) to compensation cost. Based on the number of liability-classified awards outstanding as of June 30, 2008, a hypothetical $1.00 change in the market value of the Company’s common stock would result in a $0.7 million change in pre-tax income.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and its Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Note I of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) included in Part I. Item 1. of this Form 10-Q which is incorporated by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risks facing the Company as described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company’s senior credit facility entered into on March 17, 2006 and amended on September 17, 2007 and March 28, 2008 prohibits the payment of any cash dividends on the Company’s capital stock.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the annual meeting of the shareholders held on May 29, 2008, the shareholders of the Company approved all of the proposals which had been recommended by the Board of Directors and included in the Company’s proxy statement which was mailed to shareholders on or about April 16, 2008.

With respect to Proposal 1 (election of Class III directors to serve until the 2011 annual meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified):

19,231,943 shares, or 98.08% of the votes cast, in person or by proxy, by the holders of the Company’s common stock were voted FOR the election of David A. Cole as a Class III director, and 376,913 shares withheld authority.

19,231,929 shares, or 98.08% of the votes cast, in person or by proxy, by the holders of the Company’s common stock were voted FOR the election of Philip J. Mazzilli, Jr. as a Class III director, and 376,927 shares withheld authority.

The Company’s directors serving in Class I and Class II did not stand for election at the annual meeting. The directors serving in Class I, James B. McCurry and Steven P. Rosenberg, will continue to serve until the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. The directors serving in Class II, Patrick G. Dills and N. Colin Lind, will continue to serve until the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

With respect to Proposal 2 (approval of the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan), 14,590,689 shares, or 86.78% of the votes cast, voted FOR approval of the plan, 2,232,997 shares voted AGAINST approval of the plan, and 137,421 shares abstained from voting on the proposal.

With respect to Proposal 3 (ratification of BDO Seidman, LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2008), 19,605,624 shares, or 99.99% of the votes cast, voted FOR the ratification, 1,328 shares voted AGAINST the ratification, and 1,902 shares abstained from voting on the proposal.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended and corrected through August 11, 2006 (restated solely for the purpose of filing with the Commission) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2006).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2007).

4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

4.2		See Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant, filed as Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2, respectively.

4.3		Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2000, between the Registrant and Rights Agent, effective May 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002).

4.3.1		First Amendment to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2002, between the Registrant and Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002).

4.3.2		Second Amendment to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2002, between the Registrant and Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002).

4.3.3		Third Amendment to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2006, between the Registrant and Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2005).

4.3.4		Fourth Amendment to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2006, between the Registrant and Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2005).

4.3.5		Fifth Amendment to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2006, between the Registrant and Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).

4.3.6		Sixth Amendment to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2007, between the Registrant and Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2007).

4.4		Indenture dated November 26, 2001 by and between Registrant and Sun Trust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 333-76018 on Form S-3 filed December 27, 2001).

4.5		Indenture dated as of March 17, 2006 governing 10% Senior Convertible Notes due 2011, with Form of Note appended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2006).

4.5.1		Supplemental Indenture to 10% Senior Convertible Notes Indenture dated September 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 5, 2007).

4.6		Indenture dated as of March 17, 2006 governing 11% Senior Notes due 2011, with Form of Note appended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2006).

4.6.1		Supplemental Indenture to 11% Senior Notes Indenture dated September 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 5, 2007).

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.


Exhibit
Number		Description
32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
August 6, 2008	By:	/s/ James B. McCurry
		James B. McCurry
		President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


August 6, 2008	By:	/s/ Peter Limeri
		Peter Limeri
		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents