HLTH CORPORATION
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number: 0-24975
HLTH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
94-3236644
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey
(Address of principal
executive office)
|
|
07407-1361
(Zip
code)
|
(201) 703-3400
(Registrants telephone
number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 6, 2007, there were 182,645,192 shares
of
HLTH Common Stock outstanding (including unvested shares of
restricted
HLTH Common Stock issued under our equity compensation plans).
HLTH
CORPORATION
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
For the period ended September 30, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
WebMD®,
WebMD
Health®,
CME
Circle®,
eMedicine®,
MedicineNet®,
Medscape®,
MEDPOR®,
Medsite®,
POREX®,
RxList®,
Subimo®,
Summex®,
theheart.org®,
The Little Blue
Booktm
and
ViPSsm
are among the trademarks of HLTH Corporation or its subsidiaries.
Emdeontm
and Emdeon Business
Servicestm
are among the trademarks of Emdeon Business Services, LLC or its
subsidiaries.
Note
Regarding Our Name Change
As previously announced, we changed our name from Emdeon
Corporation to HLTH Corporation in May 2007. The ticker symbol
for our Common Stock, which is listed on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market, remains HLTH. In connection with the name change,
the CUSIP number for the Registrants Common Stock changed
to: 40422Y 101. Stockholders were not required to exchange
currently outstanding stock certificates for new stock
certificates.
We had agreed to change our name in connection with the
November 2006 sale of a 52% interest in our Emdeon Business
Services segment. In that sale, we transferred our rights to the
name Emdeon and related intellectual property to
Emdeon Business Services. Emdeon Business Services owns and
continues to use the Emdeon name and related trademarks.
2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, are or may
be, forward-looking statements. For example, statements
concerning projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or
forecasts and statements that describe our objectives, future
performance, plans or goals are, or may be, forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements reflect
managements current expectations concerning future results
and events and can generally be identified by the use of
expressions such as may, will,
should, could, would,
likely, predict, potential,
continue, future, estimate,
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, foresee, and
other similar words or phrases, as well as statements in the
future tense.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be different from any
future results, performance and achievements expressed or
implied by these statements. The following important risks and
uncertainties could affect our future results, causing those
results to differ materially from those expressed in our
forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to successfully deploy new or updated applications
or services;
|
|
|
|
the failure to achieve sufficient levels of customer utilization
and market acceptance of new or updated products and services;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in forming and maintaining relationships with
customers and strategic partners;
|
|
|
|
the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated benefits from acquisitions not being fully
realized or not being realized within the expected time frames;
|
|
|
|
general economic, business or regulatory conditions affecting
the healthcare, information technology, Internet and plastics
industries being less favorable than expected; and
|
|
|
|
the other risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
under the heading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Factors That May Affect Our Future
Financial Condition or Results of Operations.
|
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other
factors, including unknown or unpredictable ones, could also
have material adverse effects on our future results.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report
are made only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. Except as
required by law or regulation, we do not undertake any
obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
subsequent events or circumstances.
3
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
HLTH
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
412,330
|
|
|
$
|
614,691
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
372,128
|
|
|
|
34,140
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,766 at September 30, 2007 and $1,296 at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
104,014
|
|
|
|
121,608
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
10,199
|
|
|
|
9,922
|
|
Due from EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
30,716
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
54,804
|
|
|
|
31,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
953,570
|
|
|
|
842,948
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
74,644
|
|
|
|
72,040
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
332,689
|
|
|
|
337,669
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
115,083
|
|
|
|
129,473
|
|
Investment in EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
23,169
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
36,203
|
|
|
|
65,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,537,992
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,815
|
|
|
$
|
3,996
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
56,483
|
|
|
|
113,175
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
91,837
|
|
|
|
87,438
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
48,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
199,569
|
|
|
|
204,609
|
|
1.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2023
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
31/8%
convertible notes due 2025
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
33,881
|
|
|
|
24,179
|
|
Minority interest in WHC
|
|
|
119,785
|
|
|
|
101,860
|
|
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock,
$0.0001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007;
10,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,768
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 4,990,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 900,000,000 shares
authorized; 457,396,650 shares issued at September 30,
2007; 449,600,747 shares issued at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
12,458,247
|
|
|
|
12,290,126
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 277,115,495 shares at
September 30, 2007; 287,770,823 shares at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(2,569,793
|
)
|
|
|
(2,585,769
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(9,363,817
|
)
|
|
|
(9,341,985
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
10,074
|
|
|
|
10,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
534,757
|
|
|
|
372,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
1,537,992
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
HLTH
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$
|
108,804
|
|
|
$
|
274,158
|
|
|
$
|
308,876
|
|
|
$
|
792,509
|
|
Products
|
|
|
24,504
|
|
|
|
25,574
|
|
|
|
75,751
|
|
|
|
76,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
133,308
|
|
|
|
299,732
|
|
|
|
384,627
|
|
|
|
868,557
|
|
Cost of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
43,737
|
|
|
|
158,967
|
|
|
|
132,380
|
|
|
|
472,951
|
|
Products
|
|
|
9,603
|
|
|
|
10,743
|
|
|
|
30,290
|
|
|
|
32,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of operations
|
|
|
53,340
|
|
|
|
169,710
|
|
|
|
162,670
|
|
|
|
505,925
|
|
Development and engineering
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
9,243
|
|
|
|
13,550
|
|
|
|
27,164
|
|
Sales, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
57,352
|
|
|
|
74,390
|
|
|
|
176,091
|
|
|
|
216,603
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
18,189
|
|
|
|
34,231
|
|
|
|
51,964
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
30,638
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
|
|
13,909
|
|
|
|
14,082
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
(2,809
|
)
|
|
|
5,267
|
|
|
|
(5,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision
|
|
|
13,861
|
|
|
|
27,267
|
|
|
|
20,081
|
|
|
|
62,571
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
15,123
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
358,048
|
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
$
|
380,467
|
|
|
$
|
(23,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
179,811
|
|
|
|
287,967
|
|
|
|
178,681
|
|
|
|
286,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
188,071
|
|
|
|
300,012
|
|
|
|
188,486
|
|
|
|
297,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
HLTH
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(23,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,143
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
56,236
|
|
|
|
(370,171
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34,231
|
|
|
|
51,964
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
(22,679
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
27,863
|
|
|
|
35,235
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
EBS working capital adjustment
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of income tax valuation allowance applied to goodwill
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
5,307
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
18,042
|
|
|
|
(18,760
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
601
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other, net
|
|
|
(1,783
|
)
|
|
|
(9,701
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
825
|
|
Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(46,333
|
)
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
|
9,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
56,565
|
|
|
|
135,814
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
(9,339
|
)
|
|
|
25,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
47,226
|
|
|
|
161,799
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
356,492
|
|
|
|
831,145
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(694,522
|
)
|
|
|
(632,955
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(18,112
|
)
|
|
|
(38,231
|
)
|
Cash paid in business combinations, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(119,635
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of EBS, net
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from advances to EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
19,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
11,667
|
|
|
|
524,245
|
|
Other changes in equity of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
(321,756
|
)
|
|
|
592,848
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(321,756
|
)
|
|
|
566,838
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of HLTH and WHC common stock
|
|
|
114,077
|
|
|
|
62,768
|
|
Tax benefit on stock-based awards
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock under repurchase program
|
|
|
(47,120
|
)
|
|
|
(71,843
|
)
|
Payments of notes payable and other
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
71,127
|
|
|
|
(9,434
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(202,361
|
)
|
|
|
719,819
|
|
Change in cash of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
614,691
|
|
|
|
155,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
412,330
|
|
|
$
|
875,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data,
unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Background
and Basis of Presentation
|
Background
HLTH Corporation (HLTH or the Company)
is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in December 1995
and commenced operations in January 1996 as Healtheon
Corporation. HLTH Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol HLTH on
February 11, 1999 and now trades on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. The Company changed its name to Healtheon/WebMD
Corporation in November 1999, to WebMD Corporation in September
2000 and to Emdeon Corporation in October 2005 in connection
with the initial public offering of equity securities of the
Companys subsidiary, WebMD Health Corp. (WHC).
In connection with the November 2006 sale of a 52% interest in
the Companys Emdeon Business Services segment, the Company
transferred its rights to the name Emdeon and
related intellectual property to Emdeon Business Services, and
agreed to change its name within nine months of the sale of
Emdeon Business Services. Accordingly, in May 2007, the Company
changed its name to HLTH Corporation.
WHCs Class A Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol WBMD on
September 29, 2005 and now trades on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. As of September 30, 2007, the Company owned
48,100,000 shares of WHC Class B Common Stock, which
represented 83.9% of the total outstanding Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock of WHC. WHC Class A
Common Stock has one vote per share, while WHC Class B
Common Stock has five votes per share. As a result, the WHC
Class B Common Stock owned by the Company represented, as
of September 30, 2007, 96.4% of the combined voting power
of WHCs outstanding Common Stock.
The Company owns 48% of EBS Master LLC (EBSCo),
which owns Emdeon Business Services LLC. Emdeon Business
Services LLC conducts the business that comprised the
Companys Emdeon Business Services segment until the
Company sold a 52% interest in that business to an affiliate of
General Atlantic LLC on November 16, 2006 (EBS
Sale). Emdeon Business Services and
EBS are used below to refer to the business owned by
EBSCo and, with respect to periods prior to the consummation of
the EBS Sale, to the reporting segment of HLTH.
The Companys consolidated financial statements for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 have been
restated to correct the previously reported income tax provision
which is more fully described in Note 15, Restatement
of Consolidated Financial Statements.
Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
consolidated accounts of HLTH and its subsidiaries and have been
prepared in United States dollars, and in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The consolidated accounts include 100% of
the assets and liabilities of the majority-owned WHC.
Additionally, the minority stockholders proportionate
share of the equity in WHC is recorded as minority interest in
WHC in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the
minority stockholders proportionate share of net income or
net loss is reflected as minority interest in WHC income (loss)
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Companys 48% ownership in EBSCo is being accounted for
under the equity method since November 16, 2006, the
transaction date of the EBS Sale. Accordingly, prior to the
transaction date, the historical results of operations of EBS
are reflected in the consolidated results of operations of the
Company. See Note 4 for further details.
As described in Note 3, on September 14, 2006, the
Company completed the sale of its Emdeon Practice Services
segment (EPS). Accordingly, the results of EPS have
been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
7
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interim
Financial Statements
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company
have been prepared by management and reflect all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) that, in the
opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of
the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any
subsequent period or for the entire year ending
December 31, 2007. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted
under the Securities and Exchange Commissions (the
SEC) rules and regulations.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes
included herein should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes for the year ended December 31, 2006, which were
included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, filed with the SEC.
Accounting
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company bases
its estimates on historical experience, current business
factors, and various other assumptions that the Company believes
are necessary to consider in order to form a basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities,
the recorded amounts of revenue and expenses, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. The Company is subject to
uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic,
environmental and political factors, and changes in the
Companys business environment; therefore, actual results
could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting
estimates used in the preparation of the Companys
financial statements will change as new events occur, as more
experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained
and as the Companys operating environment changes. Changes
in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such changes
in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies are
reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the
effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and
assumptions by management affect: the allowance for doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of inventory, the carrying value of
prepaid advertising, the carrying value of long-lived assets
(including goodwill and intangible assets), the amortization
period of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill), the carrying
value, capitalization and amortization of software and Web site
development costs, the carrying value of short-term and
long-term investments, the provision for income taxes and tax
contingencies, certain accrued expenses, revenue recognition,
contingencies, litigation and related legal accruals and the
value attributed to employee stock options and other stock-based
awards.
Seasonality
The timing of the Companys revenue is affected by seasonal
factors in both the WebMD and Porex segments. Advertising and
sponsorship revenue within the WebMD segment is seasonal,
primarily as a result of the annual budget approval process of
the advertising and sponsorship clients of the public portals.
This portion of revenue is usually the lowest in the first
quarter of each calendar year, and increases during each
consecutive quarter throughout the year. WebMDs private
portal licensing revenue is also historically highest in the
second half of the year as new customers are typically added
during this period in conjunction with their annual open
enrollment periods for employee benefits. Additionally, the
annual distribution cycle for certain publishing products
results in a significant portion of WebMDs publishing
revenue being recognized in the second and third quarter of each
calendar year. Porexs business is also impacted by
seasonal factors, primarily in its writing instrument product
lines as a result of back-to-school season, which favorably
impacts Porexs revenue during the second quarter.
8
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic income (loss) per common share and diluted income (loss)
per common share are presented in conformity with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128,
Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128). In
accordance with SFAS 128, basic income (loss) per common
share has been computed using the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the periods, increased
to give effect to the participating rights of the Convertible
Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stock during the periods in
which that preferred stock was outstanding. Diluted income
(loss) per common share has been computed using the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the periods, increased to give effect to potentially
dilutive securities. Additionally, for purposes of calculating
diluted income (loss) per common share of the Company, the
numerator has been adjusted to consider the effect of
potentially dilutive securities of WHC, which can dilute the
portion of WHCs net income otherwise retained by the
Company. The following table presents the calculation of basic
and diluted income (loss) per common share (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
16,131
|
|
|
$
|
22,419
|
|
|
$
|
33,046
|
|
|
$
|
47,972
|
|
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations Basic
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
|
|
22,507
|
|
|
|
33,220
|
|
|
|
48,235
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
358,048
|
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) Basic
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
$
|
380,555
|
|
|
$
|
(23,016
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations Basic
|
|
$
|
16,131
|
|
|
$
|
22,507
|
|
|
$
|
33,220
|
|
|
$
|
48,235
|
|
Effect of WHC dilutive securities
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations Diluted
|
|
|
15,696
|
|
|
|
22,492
|
|
|
|
32,554
|
|
|
|
48,235
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
358,048
|
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) Diluted
|
|
$
|
16,136
|
|
|
$
|
380,540
|
|
|
$
|
(23,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
179,811
|
|
|
|
277,329
|
|
|
|
171,643
|
|
|
|
276,111
|
|
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,638
|
|
|
|
7,038
|
|
|
|
10,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares Basic
|
|
|
179,811
|
|
|
|
287,967
|
|
|
|
178,681
|
|
|
|
286,749
|
|
Employee stock options, restricted stock and warrants
|
|
|
8,260
|
|
|
|
12,045
|
|
|
|
9,805
|
|
|
|
10,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed
conversions Diluted
|
|
|
188,071
|
|
|
|
300,012
|
|
|
|
188,486
|
|
|
|
297,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has excluded convertible notes, as well as certain
outstanding warrants and stock options, from the calculation of
diluted income (loss) per common share because such securities
were anti-dilutive during the periods presented. The following
table presents the total number of shares that could potentially
dilute basic income (loss) per common share in the future that
were not included in the computation of diluted income (loss)
per common share during the periods presented (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Options and warrants
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
|
|
46,467
|
|
|
|
20,175
|
|
|
|
56,106
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,069
|
|
|
|
88,482
|
|
|
|
62,190
|
|
|
|
98,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48), which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. The interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also
provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. Upon adoption, the Company reduced its existing
reserves for uncertain income tax positions by $1,475, primarily
related to a reduction in state income tax matters. This
reduction was recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to
accumulated deficit in the
10
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the
Company reduced $5,572 of a deferred tax asset and its
associated valuation allowance upon adoption of FIN 48.
As of January 1, 2007, the Company had unrecognized income
tax benefits of $6,831. If recognized, these benefits would be
reflected as a component of the income tax provision. The
Company is currently under audit in a number of state and local
taxing jurisdictions and will have statutes of limitations with
respect to certain tax returns expiring within the next twelve
months. As a result, it is reasonably possible that a reduction
in the unrecognized income tax benefits, prior to any annual
increase, may occur from $1,000 to $1,200 within the next twelve
months. With the exception of adjusting net operating loss
(NOL) carryforwards that may be utilized, the
Company is no longer subject to federal income tax examinations
for tax years before 2004 and for state and local income tax
examinations for years before 2002.
Consistent with its historical financial reporting, the Company
has elected to reflect interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions as part of the income tax provision in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of
January 1, 2007, accrued interest and penalties were
$1,135, which are included in the total unrecognized income tax
benefits of $6,831 discussed above.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits many
financial instruments and certain other items to be measured at
fair value at the option of the company. Most of the provisions
in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment to
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities
with available-for-sale and trading securities. The fair value
option established by SFAS 159 permits the choice to
measure eligible items at fair value at specified election
dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected will be reported in earnings at
each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option:
(a) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few
exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the
equity method; (b) is irrevocable (unless a new election
date occurs); and (c) is applied only to entire instruments
and not to portions of instruments. SFAS 159 is effective
for financial statements issued for the first fiscal year
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, that this new standard will have
on the Companys results of operations, financial position
or cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements
and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact, if any, that this new standard will have on the
Companys results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period
financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
|
|
2.
|
Conversion
of Convertible Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stock
|
On March 19, 2004, the Company issued $100,000 of
Convertible Redeemable Exchangeable Preferred Stock (the
Preferred Stock) in a private transaction to
CalPERS/PCG Corporate Partners, LLC (the Holder). On
June 26, 2007, the Company notified the Holder that it had
elected to redeem all outstanding
11
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
shares of its Preferred Stock. On June 29, 2007, prior to
the date set for the redemption, the Holder converted all of the
then outstanding Preferred Stock to Common Stock. In aggregate,
10,000 shares of Preferred Stock were converted to
10,638,297 shares of HLTH Common Stock during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. In connection with the
conversion of the Preferred Stock to Common Stock, the
unamortized portion of the deferred issuance costs related to
the Preferred Stock of $1,115 was reflected as a reduction to
stockholders equity.
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On September 14, 2006, the Company completed the sale of
EPS to Sage Software, Inc. (Sage Software) and,
accordingly, the financial information of EPS has been
reclassified as discontinued operations in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements for the prior year periods.
The Company received net cash proceeds of $532,991, net of
professional fees and other expenses associated with the sale of
EPS (EPS Sale), which does not include $23,333 being
held in escrow as security for the Companys
indemnification obligations under the Stock Purchase Agreement.
The amount in escrow is scheduled to be released eighteen months
from the closing date, subject to pending and paid claims, if
any, and is included in other current assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2007. During
2006, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of $353,158, net
of tax of $33,037. Summarized operating results for the
discontinued operations of EPS through September 14, 2006
and the gain recorded on disposal were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period
|
|
For the Period
|
|
|
July 1, 2006 through
|
|
January 1, 2006 through
|
|
|
September 14, 2006
|
|
September 14, 2006
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
59,351
|
|
$
|
212,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
|
5,958
|
|
|
19,469
|
Taxes on earnings
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
1,567
|
Gain on disposal, net of tax
|
|
|
352,269
|
|
|
352,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
358,048
|
|
$
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has certain indemnity obligations to advance amounts
for reasonable defense costs for initially ten and now nine
former officers and directors of EPS, who were indicted in
connection with the previously disclosed investigation by the
United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina (the
Investigation), which is more fully described in
Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies. In
connection with the sale of EPS, the Company agreed to indemnify
Sage Software relating to these indemnity obligations. During
the quarter ended June 30, 2007, based on information it
had recently received at that time, the Company determined a
reasonable estimate of the range of probable costs with respect
to its indemnification obligation was approximately $57,800 to
$83,000. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of
$57,800 during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which
represents the Companys estimate of the low end of the
probable range of costs related to this matter. The Company has
reserved the low end of the probable range of costs because no
estimate within the range was a better estimate than any other
amount. This estimate includes assumptions as to the duration of
the trial and pre-trial periods, and the defense costs to be
incurred during these periods. The ultimate outcome of this
matter is still uncertain, and accordingly, the amount of cost
the Company may ultimately incur could be substantially more
than the reserve the Company has currently provided. If the
recorded reserves are insufficient to cover the ultimate cost of
this matter, the Company will need to record additional charges
to its consolidated statement of operations in future periods.
The remaining accrual related to this obligation is reflected as
liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2007.
12
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Also included in loss from discontinued operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 is stock-based compensation
expense from the Companys equity held by EPS employees,
offset by a reduction of certain sales and use tax
contingencies, which were indemnified by the Company for Sage
Software, resulting from the expiration of statutes.
|
|
4.
|
Emdeon
Business Services
|
Equity
Investment in EBSCo
The Company accounts for its 48% investment in EBSCo as an
equity investment and records 48% of the earnings of EBSCo as
equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC in its accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. As of September 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, the Companys equity
investment in EBSCo was $23,169 and $1,521, respectively, which
reflects a difference of $122,099 and $131,180, respectively,
between the carrying value and the underlying equity in this
investment. The difference between the carrying value and the
underlying equity value, as well as the difference between the
Companys equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC and 48% of
EBSCos net income is principally due to the excess of the
fair value of EBSCos net assets as adjusted in purchase
accounting, over the carryover basis of the Companys
investment in EBSCo, net of the related amortization of a
portion of that excess related to amortizable intangible assets.
Included in the Companys equity investment in EBSCo is
$2,422, which represents the Companys share of
EBSCos unrealized loss on a derivative instrument. See
Note 11.
The following is summarized financial information of EBSCo for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
202,954
|
|
|
$
|
602,589
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
94,712
|
|
|
|
280,786
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
9,999
|
|
|
|
26,798
|
|
Sale
of Emdeon Business Services
The purchase price of the EBS Sale was subject to customary
post-closing adjustments, including an adjustment based on the
amount of working capital at the time of the closing on
November 16, 2006. During the three months ended
March 31, 2007, the Company recognized a gain of $399,
which is included in other income (expense), net and relates to
the finalization of the working capital adjustment.
Gain
Upon Sale of WHC Class A Common Stock
The Companys WHC subsidiary issues their Class A
Common Stock in various transactions from time to time, which
result in the dilution of the Companys percentage
ownership in WHC. The Company accounts for the issuance of WHC
Class A Common Stock in accordance with the SECs
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 51, Accounting for
Sales of Stock by a Subsidiary. The issuances of WHC
Class A Common Stock resulted in an aggregate gain to
equity of $3,529 and $9,398 during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, related to the
exercise of stock options and the release of restricted stock
awards. As a result, the Companys ownership in WHC
decreased to 83.9% as of September 30, 2007, from 84.6% as
of December 31, 2006.
13
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Relationships
between the Company and WHC
The Company entered into a number of agreements with WHC
governing the future relationship of the companies, including a
Tax Sharing Agreement, as amended. Under the Tax Sharing
Agreement, the Company agreed to reimburse WHC, at the current
federal statutory tax rate of 35%, for NOL carryforwards
attributable to WHC that are utilized by the Company as a result
of certain types of extraordinary transactions, as defined in
the Tax Sharing Agreement, which include the EPS Sale and EBS
Sale. During February 2007, the Company reimbursed WHC $140,000
as an estimate of the payment required pursuant to the Tax
Sharing Agreement with respect to the EPS Sale and the EBS Sale,
which was subject to adjustment in connection with the filing of
the applicable tax returns. During September 2007, the Company
finalized the NOL carryforward attributable to WHC that was
utilized as a result of the EPS Sale and EBS Sale and reimbursed
WHC an additional $9,862. The total cash reimbursement resulted
in an increase to minority interest and a decrease to additional
paid-in capital of $23,930, reflecting the portion of the
aggregate reimbursement of $149,862 that related to the minority
interest shareholders.
On December 15, 2006, the Company acquired, through WHC,
all of the outstanding limited liability company interests of
Subimo, LLC (Subimo), a privately held provider of
healthcare decision support applications to large employers,
health plans and financial institutions. The total purchase
consideration for Subimo was approximately $59,320, comprised of
$32,820 in cash paid at closing, net of cash acquired, $26,000
of WHC equity and $500 of estimated acquisition costs. Pursuant
to the terms of the purchase agreement, WHC deferred the
issuance of the $26,000 of equity, equal to 640,930 shares
of WHC Class A Common Stock (the Deferred
Shares), until December 2008. While a maximum of 246,508
of these shares may be used to settle any outstanding claims or
warranties against the seller, the remaining 394,422 of these
shares will be issued with certainty. Issuance of a portion of
these shares may be further deferred until December 2010 subject
to certain conditions. If the Deferred Shares have a market
value that is less than $24.34 per share in December 2008, then
WHC will pay additional consideration equal to this shortfall,
either in the form of WHC Class A Common Stock or cash, in
its sole discretion. The acquisition was accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase
price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed on the basis of their
respective fair values. In connection with the preliminary
allocation of the purchase price and intangible asset valuation,
goodwill of $47,494 and intangible assets subject to
amortization of $12,300 were recorded. The goodwill and
intangible assets recorded will be deductible for tax purposes.
The intangible assets are comprised of $10,000 relating to
customer relationships with estimated useful lives of twelve
years and $2,300 relating to acquired technology with an
estimated useful life of three years. The results of operations
of Subimo have been included in the financial statements of the
Company from December 15, 2006, the closing date of the
acquisition, and are included in the WebMD segment.
On September 11, 2006, the Company acquired, through WHC,
the interactive medical education, promotion and physician
recruitment businesses of Medsite, Inc. (Medsite).
Medsite provides
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for pharmaceutical,
medical device and healthcare companies, including program
development, targeted recruitment and online distribution and
delivery. In addition, Medsite provides educational programs to
physicians. The total purchase consideration for Medsite was
approximately $31,467, comprised of $30,682 in cash, net of cash
acquired, and $785 of acquisition costs. The acquisition was
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the tangible
and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed on
the basis of their respective fair values. In connection with
the allocation of the purchase price and intangible asset
valuation, goodwill of $31,948 and intangible assets subject to
amortization of $11,000 were recorded. The goodwill and
intangible assets recorded will be deductible for tax purposes.
The intangible assets are comprised of $6,000 relating to
customer relationships with estimated useful lives of twelve
years, $2,000 relating to a trade name with an
14
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
estimated useful life of ten years, $2,000 relating to content
with an estimated useful life of four years and $1,000 relating
to acquired technology with an estimated useful life of three
years. The results of operations of Medsite have been included
in the financial statements of the Company from
September 11, 2006, the closing date of the acquisition,
and are included in the WebMD segment.
On July 18, 2006, the Company acquired, through EBS,
Interactive Payer Network, Inc. (IPN), a privately
held provider of healthcare electronic data interchange
services. The total purchase consideration for IPN was
approximately $3,907, comprised of $3,799 in cash, net of cash
acquired, and $108 of acquisition costs. In addition, the
Company agreed to pay up to an additional $3,000 in cash over a
two-year period beginning in August 2007 if certain financial
milestones are achieved. The acquisition was accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase
price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed on the basis of their
respective fair values. In connection with the allocation of the
purchase price, goodwill of $3,692 was recorded. The IPN
business is part of the EBS businesses that were sold on
November 16, 2006. Accordingly, the results of operations
of IPN have been included in the financial statements of the
Company, specifically within the Emdeon Business Services
segment, from July 18, 2006 (the closing date of the
acquisition) through November 16, 2006 (the closing date of
the EBS Sale). The obligation to pay up to $3,000 in earn-out
payments was also transferred in connection with the EBS Sale
and is no longer an obligation of the Company.
On June 13, 2006, the Company acquired, through WHC, Summex
Corporation (Summex), a provider of health and
wellness programs that include online and offline health risk
assessments, lifestyle education and personalized telephonic
health coaching. The total purchase consideration for Summex was
approximately $30,191, comprised of $29,691 in cash, net of cash
acquired, and $500 of acquisition costs. In addition, the
Company has agreed to pay up to an additional $5,000 in cash in
June 2008 if certain financial milestones are achieved. The
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to
the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed on the basis of their respective fair values. In
connection with the allocation of the purchase price and
intangible asset valuation, goodwill of $19,000 and intangible
assets subject to amortization of $11,300 were recorded. The
goodwill and intangible assets recorded will not be deductible
for tax purposes. The intangible assets are comprised of $6,000
relating to customer relationships with estimated useful lives
of eleven years, $2,700 relating to acquired technology with an
estimated useful life of three years, $1,100 relating to content
with an estimated useful life of four years and $1,500 relating
to a trade name with an estimated useful life of ten years. The
results of operations of Summex have been included in the
financial statements of the Company from June 13, 2006, the
closing date of the acquisition, and are included in the WebMD
segment.
On January 17, 2006, the Company acquired, through WHC,
eMedicine.com, Inc. (eMedicine), a privately held
online publisher of medical reference information for physicians
and other healthcare professionals. The total purchase
consideration for eMedicine was approximately $25,195, comprised
of $24,495 in cash, net of cash acquired, and $700 of
acquisition costs. The acquisition was accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase
price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed on the basis of their
respective fair values. In connection with the allocation of the
purchase price and intangible asset valuation, goodwill of
$20,704 and intangible assets subject to amortization of $6,390
were recorded. The goodwill and intangible asset recorded will
not be deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets
recorded were $4,300 relating to content with an estimated
useful life of three years, $1,000 relating to acquired
technology with an estimated useful life of three years, $790
relating to a trade name with an estimated useful life of ten
years and $300 relating to customer relationships with estimated
useful lives of ten years. The results of operations of
eMedicine have been included in the financial statements of the
Company from January 17, 2006, the closing date of the
acquisition, and are included in the WebMD segment.
15
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed
Balance Sheet Data
The following table summarizes the tangible and intangible
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and the consideration
paid for each acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Tangible Assets
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
(Liabilities), net
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Subimo
|
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
|
$
|
(6,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,701
|
|
|
$
|
12,300
|
|
|
$
|
47,494
|
|
|
$
|
59,320
|
|
Medsite
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
(13,124
|
)
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
31,948
|
|
|
|
31,467
|
|
IPN
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,692
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
Summex
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
30,191
|
|
eMedicine
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
(2,612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
|
20,704
|
|
|
|
25,195
|
|
Unaudited
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 gives effect to the
acquisition of Subimo, Medsite, IPN, Summex and eMedicine,
including the amortization of intangible assets, as if the
acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2006. The
information is provided for illustrative purposes only and is
not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would
have occurred if the transactions had been consummated on the
date indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of future
operating results of the consolidated companies, and should not
be construed as representative of these results for any future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
890,951
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
41,425
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
411,596
|
|
Basic income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment information has been prepared in accordance with
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. The accounting
policies of the segments are the same as the accounting policies
for the consolidated Company. Inter-segment revenue primarily
represents printing services provided by EBS during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and certain
services provided by the Companys WebMD segment to the
Companys other operating segments during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The
performance of the Companys business is monitored based on
earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items. Other
items include: a working capital adjustment from the sale of 52%
of EBS; legal expenses incurred by the Company, which reflect
costs and expenses related to the investigation by the United
States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and the SEC,
income related to the reduction of certain sales and use tax
contingencies and advisory expense related to the evaluation, in
2006, by the Companys Board of Directors of strategic
alternatives for EBS.
16
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has aligned its business into four operating
segments and one corporate segment as follows:
WebMD provides both public and private online portals.
WebMDs public portals for consumers enable them to obtain
detailed information on a particular disease or condition, check
symptoms, locate physicians, store individual healthcare
information, receive periodic
e-newsletters
on topics of individual interest, enroll in interactive courses
and participate in online communities with peers and experts.
WebMDs public portals for physicians and healthcare
professionals make it easier for them to access clinical
reference sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical
information, learn about new treatment options, earn continuing
medical education (CME) credit and communicate with
peers. WebMDs private portals enable employers and health
plans to provide their employees and plan members with access to
personalized health and benefit information and decision-support
technology that helps them make more informed benefit, provider
and treatment choices. WebMD provides related services for use
by such employees and members, including lifestyle education and
personalized telephonic health coaching as a result of the
acquisition of Summex on June 13, 2006 and
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies as a
result of the acquisition of Medsite on September 11, 2006.
In addition, WebMD publishes: medical reference textbooks;
The Little Blue Book, a physician directory; and, since
2005, WebMD the Magazine, a consumer magazine distributed
to physician office waiting rooms. WebMD conducted in-person
medical education through December 31, 2006, the date at
which it no longer provided this service.
ViPS provides healthcare data management, analytics,
decision-support and process automation solutions and related
information technology services to governmental, Blue Cross Blue
Shield and commercial healthcare payers. ViPS develops tools for
disease management, predictive modeling, provider performance,
HEDIS®
quality improvement, healthcare fraud detection and financial
management. Consultants and outsourcing services are also
provided to assess workflow, perform software maintenance,
design complex database architectures and perform data analysis
and analytic reporting functions.
Porex develops, manufactures and distributes proprietary
porous plastic products and components used in healthcare,
industrial and consumer applications. Porexs healthcare
products consist of components used to vent or diffuse gases or
fluids, including catheter vents, self-sealing valves in
surgical vacuum canisters, fluid filtration components and
components for diagnostic devices. Porexs consumer
products are used in a variety of office and home products,
including highlighting pens, childrens coloring markers,
air fresheners, power tool dust canisters, computer printers and
water filters. Porexs industrial products are designed to
customer specifications as to size, rigidity, porosity and other
needs, including automobile battery vents, pneumatic silencers
and a broad range of filters and filtration components. Porex
also provides technologically advanced sterile surgical
products, such as biomaterial implantable products, used in
craniofacial/oculoplastic reconstruction and aesthetic/cosmetic
surgery in hospitals, clinics and private practice surgical
offices.
Emdeon Business Services provides solutions that automate
key business and administrative functions for healthcare payers
and providers, including: electronic patient eligibility and
benefit verification; electronic and paper claims processing;
electronic and paper paid-claims communication services; and
patient billing, payment and communications services. In
addition, EBS provides clinical communications services that
improve the delivery of healthcare by enabling physicians to
manage laboratory orders and results, hospital reports and
electronic prescriptions. As a result of the EBS Sale, beginning
November 17, 2006, the results of EBS are no longer
included in the segment results.
Corporate includes services shared across some or all of
the Companys operating segments, such as executive
personnel, accounting, tax, treasury, legal, human resources,
internal audit, risk management and certain information
technology functions. Corporate service costs include
compensation related costs, insurance and audit fees, leased
property, facilities cost, legal and other professional fees,
software maintenance and telecommunication costs. Additionally,
the Company entered into transition services agreements whereby
the Company provides Sage Software and EBSCo certain
administrative services, including payroll, accounting,
purchasing and procurement, tax, and human resource services, as
well as information technology support.
17
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additionally, EBSCo provides the Company certain administrative
services, including telecommunication infrastructure and
management services, data center support and purchasing and
procurement services. Some of the services provided by EBSCo to
the Company are, in turn, used to fulfill the Companys
obligations to provide transition services to Sage Software.
These services are provided through the Corporate segment, and
the related transition services fee the Company charges to EBSCo
and Sage Software, net of the fee the Company pays to EBSCo, is
also included in the Corporate segment, which approximates the
cost of providing these services. The Company charged EBSCo and
Sage Software transition service fees of $985 and $4,909 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively, and $340 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, which is net of certain fees the
Company pays to EBSCo.
Summarized financial information for each of the Companys
four operating segments and corporate segment and reconciliation
to net income (loss) are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 (a)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Business Services
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
187,266
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
557,975
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
87,198
|
|
|
|
66,645
|
|
|
|
238,639
|
|
|
|
173,308
|
|
ViPS
|
|
|
24,307
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
76,851
|
|
|
|
73,524
|
|
Porex
|
|
|
21,867
|
|
|
|
21,298
|
|
|
|
69,579
|
|
|
|
64,544
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
133,308
|
|
|
$
|
299,732
|
|
|
$
|
384,627
|
|
|
$
|
868,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Business Services
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,547
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,519
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
24,077
|
|
|
|
14,633
|
|
|
|
51,839
|
|
|
|
30,759
|
|
ViPS
|
|
|
4,809
|
|
|
|
5,302
|
|
|
|
14,743
|
|
|
|
15,517
|
|
Porex
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
6,133
|
|
|
|
20,262
|
|
|
|
18,732
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(6,053
|
)
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,267
|
)
|
|
|
(33,633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,278
|
|
|
|
59,615
|
|
|
|
67,577
|
|
|
|
158,894
|
|
Interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(11,826
|
)
|
|
|
(18,189
|
)
|
|
|
(34,231
|
)
|
|
|
(51,964
|
)
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(9,717
|
)
|
|
|
(11,226
|
)
|
|
|
(27,863
|
)
|
|
|
(35,235
|
)
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
|
(4,454
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
30,638
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,573
|
)
|
|
|
(4,723
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(14,082
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
(4,779
|
)
|
|
|
(6,956
|
)
|
|
|
(15,123
|
)
|
Minority interest in WHC (income) loss
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(2,758
|
)
|
|
|
524
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3,149
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(6,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
358,048
|
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
$
|
380,467
|
|
|
$
|
(23,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The EBS segment was sold on
November 16, 2006 and, therefore, the operations of the EBS
segment are included for the period January 1, 2006 through
September 30, 2006.
|
18
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123, (Revised 2004): Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R), which replaces
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123) and supersedes
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25). SFAS 123R requires
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense
over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the
consolidated financial statements based on their fair values.
The Company elected to use the modified prospective transition
method. Under the modified prospective transition method, awards
that were granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006
are measured and accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 123R. Unvested stock options and restricted stock
awards that were granted prior to January 1, 2006 will
continue to be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123,
using the same grant date fair value and same expense
attribution method used under SFAS 123, except that all
awards are recognized in the results of operations over the
remaining vesting periods. The impact of forfeitures that may
occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the
amount recognized for all stock-based compensation beginning
January 1, 2006.
The Company has various stock compensation plans (collectively,
the Plans) under which directors, officers and other
eligible employees receive awards of options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock and restricted shares of HLTH Common Stock.
Additionally, the Companys majority owned public
subsidiary has two similar stock-based compensation plans that
provide for stock options and restricted stock awards based on
WHC Class A Common Stock. The Company also maintains an
Employee Stock Purchase Plan which provides employees with the
ability to buy shares of HLTH Common Stock at a discount. The
following sections of this note summarize the activity for each
of these plans.
HLTH
Plans
The Company had an aggregate of 5,695,389 shares of HLTH
Common Stock available for future grants under the Plans as of
September 30, 2007. In addition to the Plans, the Company
has granted options to certain directors, officers and key
employees pursuant to individual stock option agreements. At
September 30, 2007, there were options to purchase
4,139,881 shares of HLTH Common Stock outstanding to these
individuals. The terms of these grants are similar to the terms
of the options granted under the Plans and accordingly, the
stock option activity of these individuals is included in all
references to the Plans. Beginning in April 2007, shares are
issued from treasury stock when options are exercised or
restricted stock is granted. Prior to this time, new shares were
issued in connection with these transactions.
19
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Options
Generally, options under the Plans vest and become exercisable
ratably over a three to five year period based on their
individual grant dates subject to continued employment on the
applicable vesting dates. The majority of options granted under
the Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant.
Options are granted at prices not less than the fair market
value of HLTH Common Stock on the date of grant. The following
table summarizes activity for the Plans for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
63,599,871
|
|
|
$
|
14.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
12.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(10,777,064
|
)
|
|
|
9.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(3,408,376
|
)
|
|
|
25.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
49,584,431
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
114,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
42,088,065
|
|
|
$
|
15.03
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
83,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is
based on the market price of the Company Common Stock on
September 28, 2007, the last trading day in September,
which was $14.17, less the applicable exercise price of the
underlying option. This aggregate intrinsic value represents the
amount that would have been realized if all of the option
holders had exercised their options on September 28, 2007.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
considering the assumptions noted in the following table.
Expected volatility is based on implied volatility from traded
options of HLTH Common Stock combined with historical volatility
of HLTH Common Stock. The expected term represents the period of
time that options are expected to be outstanding following their
grant date, and was determined using historical exercise data.
The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options on
the grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.67
|
%
|
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$
|
4.01
|
|
|
$
|
3.47
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
HLTH Restricted Stock consists of shares of HLTH Common Stock
which have been awarded to employees with restrictions that
cause them to be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture and
restrict their sale or other transfer by the employee until they
vest. Generally, HLTH Restricted Stock awards vest ratably over
a three to five year period from their individual award dates
subject to continued employment on the applicable
20
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
vesting dates. The following table summarizes the activity of
non-vested HLTH Restricted Stock during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
2,300,846
|
|
|
$
|
10.44
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(470,886
|
)
|
|
|
8.97
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(89,001
|
)
|
|
|
9.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,740,959
|
|
|
$
|
10.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock were $8,821 and $107,635 during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $32,317
and $62,060 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively. The intrinsic value
related to the exercise of these stock options, as well as the
fair value of shares of HLTH Restricted Stock that vested was
$4,703 and $55,635 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, and $25,460 and $44,320
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively.
WebMD
Plans
During September 2005, WHC adopted the 2005 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the WHC Plan). In connection with the
acquisition of Subimo in December 2006, WHC adopted the WebMD
Health Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan for Employees of Subimo
(the Subimo Plan). The terms of the Subimo Plan are
similar to the terms of the WHC Plan but it has not been
approved by WHC stockholders. Awards under the Subimo Plan were
made on the date of the Companys acquisition of Subimo in
reliance on the NASDAQ Global Select Market exception to
shareholder approval for equity grants to new hires. No
additional grants will be made under the Subimo Plan. The WHC
Plan and the Subimo Plan are included in all references as the
WebMD Plans. The maximum number of shares of WHC
Class A Common Stock that may be subject to options or
restricted stock awards under the WebMD Plans is 9,480,574,
subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the WebMD
Plans. WHC had an aggregate of 2,964,620 shares of
Class A Common Stock available for future grants under the
WebMD Plans as of September 30, 2007.
Stock
Options
Generally, options under the WebMD Plans vest and become
exercisable ratably over a four year period based on their
individual grant dates subject to continued employment on the
applicable vesting dates. The options granted under the WebMD
Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant. Options
are generally
21
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
at prices not less than the fair market value of WHC
Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. The following
table summarizes activity for the WebMD Plans for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
5,401,783
|
|
|
$
|
23.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
632,900
|
|
|
|
48.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(379,918
|
)
|
|
|
22.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(496,943
|
)
|
|
|
31.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
5,157,822
|
|
|
$
|
25.98
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
134,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
1,570,559
|
|
|
$
|
19.25
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
51,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is
based on the market price of WHC Class A Common Stock on
September 28, 2007, the last trading day in September,
which was $52.10, less the applicable exercise price of the
underlying option. This aggregate intrinsic value represents the
amount that would have been realized if all of the option
holders had exercised their options on September 28, 2007.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
considering the assumptions noted in the following table. Prior
to August 1, 2007, expected volatility was based on implied
volatility from traded options of stock of comparable companies
combined with historical stock price volatility of comparable
companies. Beginning on August 1, 2007, expected volatility
is based on implied volatility from traded options of WHC
Class A Common Stock combined with historical volatility of
WHC Class A Common Stock. The expected term represents the
period of time that options are expected to be outstanding
following their grant date, and was determined using historical
exercise data of WHC employees who were previously granted HLTH
stock options. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected
term of the options on the grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$
|
18.16
|
|
|
$
|
17.11
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
WHC Restricted Stock consists of shares of WHC Class A
Common Stock which have been awarded to employees with
restrictions that cause them to be subject to substantial risk
of forfeiture and restrict their sale or other transfer by the
employee until they vest. Generally, WHC Restricted Stock awards
vest ratably over a four year period from their individual award
dates subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting
22
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
dates. The following table summarizes the activity of non-vested
WHC Restricted Stock during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
441,683
|
|
|
$
|
25.49
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
34,200
|
|
|
|
50.08
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(97,212
|
)
|
|
|
20.71
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(89,722
|
)
|
|
|
30.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
288,949
|
|
|
$
|
28.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of options to purchase WHC
Class A Common Stock were $2,767 and $8,490 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and
$649 during both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006. The intrinsic value related to the
exercise of these stock options, as well as the fair value of
shares of WHC Restricted Stock that vested was $8,203 and
$15,291 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007, respectively, and $3,888 and $3,899 during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The Companys 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
from time to time (the ESPP), allows eligible
employees the opportunity to purchase shares of HLTH Common
Stock through payroll deductions, up to 15% of a
participants annual compensation with a maximum of
5,000 shares available per participant during each purchase
period. The purchase price of the stock is 85% of the fair
market value on the last day of each purchase period. As of
September 30, 2007, a total of 8,110,362 shares of
HLTH Common Stock were reserved for issuance under the ESPP. The
ESPP provides for annual increases equal to the lesser of
1,500,000 shares, 0.5% of the outstanding common shares, or
a lesser amount determined by the Board of Directors. There were
34,610 and 167,142 shares issued under the ESPP during the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. No shares were issued during the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
Other
At the time of the WHC initial public offering and each year on
the anniversary of the IPO, WHC issued shares of WHC
Class A Common Stock to each non-employee director with a
value equal to their annual board and committee retainers. The
Company recorded $85 of stock-based compensation expense during
the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and $255
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 in
connection with these issuances.
Additionally, the Company recorded $279 and $815 of stock-based
compensation expense during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, in connection with a
stock transferability right for shares required to be issued in
connection with the acquisition of Subimo by WHC.
23
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summary
of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the components and classification
of stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
HLTH Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
2,791
|
|
|
$
|
5,413
|
|
|
$
|
9,040
|
|
|
$
|
17,022
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
3,495
|
|
WebMD Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
4,295
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
11,587
|
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
|
|
3,026
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
Other
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
9,956
|
|
|
$
|
12,799
|
|
|
$
|
29,023
|
|
|
$
|
38,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
$
|
1,518
|
|
|
$
|
3,010
|
|
|
$
|
4,168
|
|
|
$
|
9,353
|
|
Development and engineering
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Sales, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
23,403
|
|
|
|
25,028
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
9,957
|
|
|
|
11,226
|
|
|
|
28,901
|
|
|
|
35,235
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
9,956
|
|
|
$
|
12,799
|
|
|
$
|
29,023
|
|
|
$
|
38,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits attributable to the stock-based compensation
expense were only realized in certain states in which the
Company does not have operating loss carryforwards because a
valuation allowance was maintained for substantially all net
deferred tax assets. As of September 30, 2007, $27,772 and
$39,875 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related
to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
1.18 years and 1.78 years related to the HLTH Plans
and the WebMD Plans, respectively.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In December 2006, the Company announced the authorization of a
stock repurchase program (the Program), at which
time the Company was authorized to use up to $100,000 to
purchase shares of HLTH Common Stock from time to time beginning
on December 19, 2006, subject to market conditions. As of
September 30, 2007, the Company had repurchased
4,268,895 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately
$58,444 under the Program. Repurchased shares are recorded under
the cost method and are reflected as treasury stock in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the
Companys short-term investments and marketable debt
securities consisted of certificates of deposit, auction rate
securities, asset backed securities and money market funds and
marketable equity securities consisted of equity investments in
publicly traded companies.
24
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
All marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost basis and
estimated fair value of the Companys investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
412,330
|
|
|
$
|
412,330
|
|
|
$
|
614,691
|
|
|
$
|
614,691
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
372,128
|
|
|
|
372,128
|
|
|
|
34,140
|
|
|
|
34,140
|
|
Marketable securities long term
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss)
and other comprehensive (loss) income. Other comprehensive
(loss) income includes foreign currency translation adjustments
and certain changes in equity that are excluded from net income
(loss) (such as changes in unrealized holding losses or gains on
available-for-sale marketable securities and 48% of the
comprehensive loss of EBSCo, the Companys equity
investment). The following table presents the components of
other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains
|
|
$
|
1,554
|
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1,056
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss of EBSCo
|
|
|
(5,918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(4,896
|
)
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
16,571
|
|
|
|
380,467
|
|
|
|
(23,190
|
)
|
|
|
418,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11,675
|
|
|
$
|
381,641
|
|
|
$
|
(23,226
|
)
|
|
$
|
419,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in comprehensive loss of EBSCo is the Companys
share of unrealized loss on a derivative instrument that EBSCo
entered into to hedge the impact of changes in interest rates on
its variable-rate debt.
The foreign currency translation gains are not currently
adjusted for income taxes as they relate to permanent
investments in
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Accumulated other comprehensive income includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities
|
|
$
|
1,161
|
|
|
$
|
1,159
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains
|
|
|
11,342
|
|
|
|
8,951
|
|
Comprehensive loss of EBSCo
|
|
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
10,074
|
|
|
$
|
10,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2006 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
ViPS
|
|
|
Porex
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
681,612
|
|
|
$
|
100,669
|
|
|
$
|
71,253
|
|
|
$
|
42,441
|
|
|
$
|
895,975
|
|
Acquisitions during the period
|
|
|
3,692
|
|
|
|
122,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,474
|
|
Contingent consideration for prior period acquisitions
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
Tax reversals
|
|
|
(40,522
|
)
|
|
|
(1,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(42,456
|
)
|
Adjustments to finalize purchase price allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
Sale of EBS
|
|
|
(642,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(642,869
|
)
|
Effects of exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,484
|
|
|
|
71,253
|
|
|
|
42,932
|
|
|
|
337,669
|
|
Tax reversals (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,676
|
)
|
Adjustments to finalize purchase price allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,628
|
)
|
Effects of exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,180
|
|
|
$
|
71,253
|
|
|
$
|
43,256
|
|
|
$
|
332,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents a reduction to goodwill
as a result of the reversal of a portion of the income tax
valuation allowance that was originally established in
connection with the purchase accounting of prior acquisitions.
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life(a)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life (a)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
73,244
|
|
|
$
|
(18,010
|
)
|
|
$
|
55,234
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
$
|
68,168
|
|
|
$
|
(13,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
54,868
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
79,221
|
|
|
|
(36,316
|
)
|
|
|
42,905
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
79,221
|
|
|
|
(27,453
|
)
|
|
|
51,768
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
18,217
|
|
|
|
(5,795
|
)
|
|
|
12,422
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
18,216
|
|
|
|
(4,443
|
)
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Non-compete agreements, content and other
|
|
|
16,154
|
|
|
|
(11,632
|
)
|
|
|
4,522
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
17,054
|
|
|
|
(7,990
|
)
|
|
|
9,064
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
186,836
|
|
|
$
|
(71,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,083
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
$
|
182,659
|
|
|
$
|
(53,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
129,473
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The calculation of the weighted
average remaining useful life is based on the net book value and
the remaining amortization period (reflected in years) of each
respective intangible asset.
|
26
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense was $6,219 and $18,549 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and
$8,188 and $24,726 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively. Aggregate amortization
expense for intangible assets is estimated to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2007 (October 1st to December 31st)
|
|
$
|
6,159
|
|
2008
|
|
|
21,309
|
|
2009
|
|
|
15,284
|
|
2010
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,058
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
57,342
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Investigations
by United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and
the SEC
As previously disclosed, the United States Attorney for the
District of South Carolina is conducting an investigation of the
Company, which the Company first learned about on
September 3, 2003. Based on the information available to
the Company, it believes that the investigation relates
principally to issues of financial accounting improprieties
relating to Medical Manager Corporation, a predecessor of the
Company (by its merger into the Company in September 2000), and,
more specifically, its Medical Manager Health Systems, Inc.
subsidiary. Medical Manager Health Systems was a predecessor to
Emdeon Practice Services, Inc., a subsidiary that the Company
sold to Sage Software in September 2006. The Company has been
cooperating and intends to continue to cooperate fully with the
U.S. Attorneys Office. As previously reported, the
Board of Directors of the Company has formed a special committee
consisting solely of independent directors to oversee this
matter with the sole authority to direct the Companys
response to the allegations that have been raised. As previously
disclosed, the Company understands that the SEC is also
conducting a formal investigation into this matter. In
connection with the EPS Sale, the Company agreed to indemnify
Sage Software with respect to this matter.
The United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
announced on January 10, 2005, that three former employees
of Medical Manager Health Systems each had agreed to plead
guilty to one count of mail fraud and that one such employee had
agreed to plead guilty to one count of tax evasion for acts
committed while they were employed by Medical Manager Health
Systems. The three former employees include a Vice President of
Medical Manager Health Systems responsible for acquisitions who
was terminated for cause in January 2003; an executive who
served in various accounting roles at Medical Manager Health
Systems until his resignation in March 2002; and a former
independent Medical Manager dealer who was a paid consultant to
Medical Manager Health Systems until the termination of his
services in 2002. According to the Informations, Plea Agreements
and Factual Summaries filed by the United States Attorney in,
and available from, the District Court of the United States for
the District of South Carolina Beaufort Division, on
January 7, 2005, the three former employees and other then
unnamed co-schemers were engaged in schemes between 1997 and
2002 that included causing companies acquired by Medical Manager
Health Systems to pay the former vice president in charge of
acquisitions and co-schemers kickbacks which were funded through
increases in the purchase price paid by Medical Manager Health
Systems to the acquired companies and that included fraudulent
accounting practices to inflate artificially the quarterly
revenues and earnings of Medical Manager Health Systems when it
was an independent public company called Medical Manager
Corporation from 1997 through 1999, when and after it was
acquired by Synetic, Inc. in July 1999 and when and after it
became a subsidiary of the Company in September 2000. A fourth
former officer of Medical Manager Health Systems pleaded guilty
to similar activities later in 2005.
27
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fraudulent accounting practices cited by the government in
the January 7, 2005 District Court filings included:
causing companies acquired by Medical Manager Health Systems to
reclassify previously recognized sales revenue as deferred
income so that such deferred income could subsequently be
reported as revenue by Medical Manager Health Systems and its
parents in later periods; fabricating deferred revenue entries
which could be used to inflate earnings when Medical Manager
Health Systems acquired companies; causing companies acquired by
Medical Manager Health Systems to inflate reserve accounts so
that these reserves could be reversed in later reporting periods
in order to artificially inflate earnings for Medical Manager
Health Systems and its parents; accounting for numerous
acquisitions through the pooling of interests method in order to
fraudulently inflate Medical Manager Health Systems
quarterly earnings, when the individuals involved knew the
transactions failed to qualify for such treatment; causing
companies acquired by Medical Manager Health Systems to enter
into sham purchases of software from Medical Manager Health
Systems in connection with the acquisition which purchases were
funded by increasing the purchase price paid by Medical Manager
Health Systems to the acquired company and using these
round trip sales to create fraudulent revenue for
Medical Manager Health Systems and its parents; and causing
Medical Manager Health Systems to book and record sales and
training revenue before the revenue process was complete in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and
thereby fraudulently inflating Medical Manager Health Systems
reported revenues and earnings. According to the Informations to
which the former employees have pled guilty, the fraudulent
accounting practices resulted in the reported revenues of
Medical Manager Health Systems and its parents being overstated
materially between June 1997 and at least December 31,
2001, and reported quarterly earnings being overstated by at
least one cent per share in every quarter during that period.
The documents filed by the United States Attorney in January
2005 stated that the former employees engaged in their
fraudulent conduct in concert with senior
management, and at the direction of senior Medical
Manager officers. In its statement at that time, the
United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina stated
that the senior management and officers referred to in the
Court documents were members of senior management of the Medical
Manager subsidiary during the relevant time period.
On December 15, 2005, the United States Attorney announced
indictments of the following former officers and employees of
Medical Manager Health Systems: Ted W. Dorman, a former Regional
Vice President of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was
employed until March 2003; Charles L. Hutchinson, a former
Controller of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed
until June 2001; Maxie L. Juzang, a former Vice President of
Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed until August
2005; John H. Kang, a former President of Medical Manager Health
Systems, who was employed until May 2001; Frederick B.
Karl, Jr., a former General Counsel of Medical Manager
Health Systems, who was employed until April 2000; Franklyn B.
Krieger, a former Associate General Counsel of Medical Manager
Health Systems, who was employed until February 2002; Lee A.
Robbins, a former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed until September
2000; John P. Sessions, a former President and Chief Operating
Officer of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed
until September 2003; Michael A. Singer, a former Chief
Executive Officer of Medical Manager Health Systems and a former
director of the Company, who was most recently employed by the
Company as its Executive Vice President, Physician Software
Strategies until February 2005; and David Ward, a former Vice
President of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed
until June 2005. The indictment charges the persons listed above
with conspiracy to commit mail, wire and securities fraud, a
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371
and conspiracy to commit money laundering, a violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(h). The
indictment charges Messrs. Sessions and Ward with
substantive counts of money laundering, violations of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957. The
allegations set forth in the indictment describe activities that
are substantially similar to those described above with respect
to the January 2005 plea agreements.
On February 27, 2007, the United States Attorney filed a
Second Superseding Indictment with respect to the former
officers and employees of Medical Manager Health Systems charged
under the prior Indictment,
28
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
other than Mr. Juzang. The allegations set forth in the
Second Superseding Indictment are substantially similar to those
described above.
Based on the information it has obtained to date, including that
contained in the court documents filed by the United States
Attorney in South Carolina, the Company does not believe that
any member of its senior management whose duties were not
primarily related to the operations of Medical Manager Health
Systems during the relevant time periods engaged in any of the
violations or improprieties described in those court documents.
The Company understands, however, that in light of the nature of
the allegations involved, the U.S. Attorneys office
has been investigating all levels of the Companys
management. The Company has not uncovered information that it
believes would require a restatement for any of the years
covered by its financial statements. In addition, the Company
believes that the amounts of the kickback payments referred to
in the court documents have already been reflected in the
financial statements of the Company to the extent required.
The Company has certain indemnity obligations to advance amounts
for reasonable defense costs for the initial ten, and now nine
former officers and directors of EPS. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge
of $57,800, related to its estimated liability with respect to
these indemnity obligations. See Note 3 for a more detailed
discussion regarding this charge.
Directors &
Officers Liability Insurance Coverage Litigation
On July 23, 2007, the Company commenced litigation (the
Coverage Litigation) in the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware in and for New Castle County against nine
insurance companies in which the Company is seeking to compel
the defendant companies (collectively, the
Defendants) to honor their obligations under certain
directors and officers liability insurance policies (the
Policies). Pursuant to a stipulation among the
parties, the Coverage Litigation was transferred on
September 13, 2007 to the Superior Court of the State of
Delaware in and for New Castle County. The Policies were issued
to the Company and to EPS, a former subsidiary of the Company,
which is a co-plaintiff with the Company in the Coverage
Litigation (collectively, the Plaintiffs). EPS was
sold in September 2006 to Sage Software and has changed its name
to Sage Software Healthcare, Inc. (SSHI).
The Plaintiffs in the Coverage Litigation are seeking an order
requiring the Defendants to advance
and/or
reimburse expenses that the Company has incurred and expects to
continue to incur for the advancement of the reasonable defense
costs of initially ten and now nine former officers and
directors of the Companys former EPS subsidiary who were
indicted in connection with the Investigation described above in
this Note 13. In connection with the Companys sale of
EPS to Sage Software, the Company retained certain obligations
relating to the Investigation and agreed to indemnify Sage
Software and SSHI with respect to certain expenses in connection
with the Investigation. The Company retained the right to assert
claims and recover proceeds under the Policies on behalf of SSHI.
The Policies at issue in the Coverage Litigation consist of two
separate groups of insurance policies. Each group of policies
consists of several layers of coverage, with certain insurers
having agreed to provide specified amounts of coverage before
the coverage provided by other insurers at higher layers is
available. The first group of policies was issued to EPS in the
amount of $20,000 (the EPS Policies) and the second
group of policies was issued to Synetic, Inc. (the former parent
of EPS, which merged into the Company) in the amount of $100,000
(the Synetic Policies). To date, $10,000 has been
paid by insurance companies representing the first two of the
four total layers of insurance coverage under the EPS Policies,
and $6,414 has been paid by the insurance company representing
the primary layer of insurance coverage under the Synetic
Policies, in each case subject to reservations of rights. The
Companys insurance policies provide that under certain
circumstances, amounts advanced by the insurance companies in
connection with the defense costs of the indicted individuals,
may have to be repaid by the Company. The Company has obtained
an undertaking from each indicted individual pursuant to which,
under certain circumstances, such individual has agreed to repay
defense costs advanced on his behalf.
29
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company believes that the Defendants are required to advance
and/or
reimburse amounts that the Company has incurred and expects to
continue to incur for the advancement of the reasonable defense
costs of the indicted individuals (and the Company has in fact
been reimbursed, subject to reservations of rights, by other
insurance companies who have issued policies in the same groups
of policies as the Defendants). However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will prevail in the Coverage
Litigation or that the Defendants will be required to provide
funding on an interim basis pending the resolution of the
Coverage Litigation. The Company intends to continue to satisfy
its legal obligations to the indicted individuals with respect
to advancement of amounts for their defense costs.
Litigation
Regarding Distribution of Shares in Healtheon Initial Public
Offering
As previously disclosed, seven purported class action lawsuits
were filed against Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
and Goldman Sachs & Co., underwriters of the initial
public offering of the Company (then known as Healtheon
Corporation) in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in the summer and fall of 2001.
Three of these suits also named the Company and certain of its
former officers and directors as defendants. These suits were
filed in the wake of reports of governmental investigations of
the underwriters practices in the distribution of shares
in certain initial public offerings. Similar suits were filed in
connection with over 300 other initial public offerings that
occurred in 1999, 2000 and 2001.
The complaints against the Company and its former officers and
directors alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b-5
under that Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
because of failure to disclose certain practices alleged to have
occurred in connection with the distribution of shares in the
Healtheon IPO. Claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933 were also brought against the
underwriters. These claims were consolidated, along with claims
relating to over 300 other initial public offerings, in the
Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs have dismissed the
claims against the four former officers and directors of the
Company without prejudice, pursuant to Reservation of Rights
Tolling Agreements with those individuals. On July 15,
2002, the issuer defendants in the consolidated action,
including the Company, filed a joint motion to dismiss the
consolidated complaints. On February 18, 2003, the District
Court denied, with certain exceptions not relevant to the
Company, the issuer defendants motion to dismiss.
After a lengthy mediation under the auspices of former United
States District Judge Nicholas Politan, the issuer defendants in
the consolidated action (including the Company), the affected
insurance companies, and the plaintiffs reached an agreement on
a settlement to resolve the matter among the participating
issuer defendants, their insurers, and the plaintiffs. The
settlement called for the participating issuers insurers
jointly to guarantee that plaintiffs recover a certain amount in
the IPO litigation and certain related litigation from the
underwriters and other non-settling defendants. Accordingly, in
the event the guarantee became payable, the agreement called for
the Companys insurance carriers, not the Company, to pay
the Companys pro rata share.
The Company, and virtually all of the approximately 260 other
issuer defendants who were eligible to participate, elected to
participate in the settlement. Although the Company believed
that the claims alleged in the lawsuits were primarily directed
at the underwriters and, as they relate to the Company, were
without merit, the Company believed that the settlement was
beneficial to the Company because it would have reduced the
time, expense and risks of further litigation, particularly
since virtually all the other issuer defendants elected to
participate and the Companys insurance carriers strongly
supported the settlement.
On June 10, 2004, plaintiffs submitted to the court a
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Defendant Issuers
and Individuals. On February 15, 2005, the court certified
the proposed settlement class and preliminarily approved the
settlement, subject to certain modifications, to which the
parties agreed. On April 24, 2006, the court held a hearing
for final approval of the settlement.
On December 5, 2006, in response to an appeal by the
underwriter defendants, the United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit reversed the district courts
certification of the classes in six related focus
30
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cases dealing with the offerings of other issuers. On
April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the
plaintiffs petition for rehearing. In the view of counsel
for the issuers and the insurance carriers and the district
court, the definition of the proposed settlement class embodied
in the settlement was inconsistent with the Second
Circuits ruling on class certification in the focus cases.
Accordingly, the parties to the previously-negotiated settlement
agreement terminated the settlement agreement. On June 28,
2007, the court entered a Stipulation and Order terminating the
settlement.
On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed amended complaints
in the six focus cases, in which they propose a new
class definition, and on September 27, 2007, they filed a
motion for class certification. Briefing on the amended
complaints is scheduled to be completed on January 28,
2008, and briefing on the motion for class certification is
scheduled to be completed on February 15, 2008. At this
point, it is impossible to determine whether a class will be
certified.
Porex
Corporation v. Kleanthis Dean Haldopoulos, Benjamin T.
Hirokawa and Micropore Plastics, Inc.
On September 24, 2005, the Companys subsidiary Porex
Corporation filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton
County against two former employees of Porex, Dean Haldopoulos
and Benjamin Hirokawa, and their corporation, Micropore
Plastics, Inc. (Micropore), alleging
misappropriation of Porexs trade secrets and breaches of
Haldopoulos and Hirokawas employment agreements, and
seeking monetary and injunctive relief. The lawsuit was
subsequently transferred to the Superior Court of DeKalb County,
Georgia. On October 24, 2005, the defendants filed an
Answer and Counterclaims against Porex. In the Answer and
Counterclaims, the defendants allege that Porex breached
non-disclosure and standstill agreements in connection with a
proposed transaction between Porex and Micropore and engaged in
fraud. The defendants also seek punitive damages and expenses of
litigation. On February 13, 2006, the Superior Court
granted a motion by the defendants for summary judgment with
respect to Porexs trade secret claims, ruling that those
claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Porex appealed
that ruling to the Georgia Court of Appeals and, on
March 27, 2007, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the
ruling of the Superior Court. On April 16, 2007, the
defendants filed a petition for certiorari with the Georgia
Supreme Court, requesting that the Georgia Supreme Court review
and reverse the March 27, 2007 decision of the Court of
Appeals. On June 25, 2007, the Georgia Supreme Court denied
the defendants petition for certiorari. On or about
July 31, 2007, the Georgia Court of Appeals formally
returned the case to the Superior Court for further proceedings,
and the parties are proceeding with discovery.
Porex is continuing to seek to vigorously enforce its rights in
this litigation.
Other
In the normal course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are involved in various other claims and legal
proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters,
including those discussed in the Companys 2006 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
under the heading Legal Proceedings has yet to be
determined, the Company does not believe that their outcome will
have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
31
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. Other
Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists of the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Transition service fees, net (a)
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
4,909
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of tax contingencies (c)
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal expense (d)
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(1,023
|
)
|
|
|
(1,164
|
)
|
|
|
(1,840
|
)
|
Advisory expense (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
|
$
|
(2,809
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,267
|
|
|
$
|
(5,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents the net fees received
from Sage Software and EBSCo in relation to their respective
transition services agreements.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents a gain recognized in
connection with the working capital adjustment associated with
the EBS Sale on November 16, 2006.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents the reduction of certain
sales and use tax contingencies resulting from the expiration of
various statutes.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents the costs and expenses
incurred by the Company related to the investigation by the
United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and
the SEC.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Represents professional fees,
primarily consisting of legal, accounting and financial advisory
services, related to the EBS Sale.
|
|
|
15.
|
Restatement
of Consolidated Financial Statements
|
In May 2007, the Company identified an error in its accounting
for non-cash income tax expense and related deferred taxes. The
error related to the tax impact of goodwill and certain
intangible assets arising from certain business combinations,
primarily tax-deductible goodwill which is amortized as an
expense for tax purposes over 15 years but is not amortized
to expense for financial reporting purposes since the adoption
of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets as of January 1, 2002. The Company had
recorded a deferred income tax expense and a deferred tax
liability related to the tax-deductible goodwill. However, in
preparing its financial statements, the Company had incorrectly
netted the deferred tax liability resulting from the
amortization of tax-deductible goodwill against deferred tax
assets (primarily relating to the Companys NOL
carryforwards) and provided a valuation allowance on the net
asset balance. Because the deferred tax liability has an
indefinite life, it should not have been netted against deferred
tax assets with a definite life when determining the required
valuation allowance. As a result, the Company did not record the
appropriate valuation allowance and related deferred income tax
expense. The deferred tax liability described above will remain
on the balance sheet of the Company indefinitely unless there is
an impairment of goodwill for financial reporting purposes or
the related business entity is disposed of through a sale or
otherwise.
The error had resulted in an understatement of deferred income
tax expense and related deferred tax liability and an
overstatement of net income in the amount of $1,305 and $3,041
in the Companys unaudited financial statements for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively. Additionally, as a portion of the adjustment to
deferred income tax expense related to WHC, the Company has also
adjusted the minority interest in WHC. The net impact to the
Companys net income, after adjusting for the minority
interest, was $1,234 and $3,170 in the aggregate during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006,
respectively. The correction had no effect on the Companys
revenues, total assets, cash flows or liquidity during these
periods and no effect on the Companys pre-tax operating
results, other than the effect on minority interest. The Company
believes that there will be no effect on its debt agreements or
other contractual obligations as a result of this error.
The Companys consolidated financial statements for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 have been
restated for the error described above. The effects of this
change on the consolidated statement
32
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
3,474
|
|
|
$
|
1,305
|
|
|
$
|
4,779
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
23,653
|
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
381,701
|
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
380,467
|
|
Basic income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
12,082
|
|
|
$
|
3,041
|
|
|
$
|
15,123
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
51,142
|
|
|
|
(3,170
|
)
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
421,313
|
|
|
|
(3,170
|
)
|
|
|
418,143
|
|
Basic income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
As Previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
421,313
|
|
|
$
|
(3,170
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,143
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
33
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Item 2 contains forward-looking statements with
respect to possible events, outcomes or results that are, and
are expected to continue to be, subject to risks, uncertainties
and contingencies, including those identified in this Item. See
Forward-Looking Statements on page 3.
The information for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 has been adjusted to reflect the
restatement of our financial results to correct the previously
reported income tax provision, which is more fully described in
Note 15, Restatement of Consolidated Financial
Statements located in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, or MD&A, is provided as a
supplement to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and to
provide an understanding of our results of operations, financial
condition and changes in financial condition.
Our MD&A is organized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction. This section provides a general
description of our company, a brief discussion of our operating
segments, a description of certain recent developments,
background information on certain trends and strategies and a
discussion on how our business is impacted by seasonality.
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates. This section discusses those
accounting policies that both are considered important to our
financial condition and results of operations, and require us to
exercise subjective or complex judgments in making estimates and
assumptions. In addition, all of our significant accounting
policies, including our critical accounting policies, are
summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(which we refer to as the SEC).
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. This section
provides a summary of the most recent authoritative accounting
standards and guidance that have either been recently adopted or
may be adopted in the future.
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations and Results of Operations by Operating
Segment. These sections provide our analysis and
outlook for the significant line items on our consolidated
statements of operations, as well as other information that we
deem meaningful to understand our results of operations on both
a company-wide and a
segment-by-segment
basis.
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section
provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flows and
discussions of our contractual obligations and commitments, as
well as our outlook on our available liquidity as of
September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Factors That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or
Results of Operations. This section describes
circumstances or events that could have a negative effect on our
financial condition or results of operations, or that could
change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of our
businesses. The factors discussed in this section are in
addition to factors that may be described elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report.
|
In this MD&A, dollar amounts are in thousands, unless
otherwise noted.
Introduction
Company
Overview
HLTH Corporation (which we refer to as HLTH) is a Delaware
corporation that was incorporated in December 1995 and commenced
operations in January 1996 as Healtheon Corporation. Our common
stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol HLTH on February 11, 1999 and now trades
34
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We changed our name to
Healtheon/WebMD Corporation in November 1999, to WebMD
Corporation in September 2000 and to Emdeon Corporation in
October 2005 in connection with the initial public offering of
equity securities of WebMD Health Corp. (which we refer to as
WHC), our WebMD segment. In connection with the November 2006
sale of a 52% interest in our Emdeon Business Services segment,
we transferred our rights to the name Emdeon and
related intellectual property to Emdeon Business Services, and
agreed to change our name within nine months of the sale of
Emdeon Business Service. Accordingly, in May 2007, Emdeon
Corporation changed its name to HLTH Corporation.
As of September 30, 2007, we owned 83.9% of the aggregate
amount of outstanding shares of WHC Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock and, accordingly, we consolidated
the minority shareholders 16.1% share of equity and net
income or loss of WHC.
On September 14, 2006, we completed the sale of our Emdeon
Practice Services segment (which we refer to as EPS) to Sage
Software, Inc. (which we refer to as Sage Software). We refer to
this transaction in this MD&A as the EPS Sale. Accordingly,
the results of EPS have been presented as discontinued
operations in our consolidated financial statements for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as well as
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
We own 48% of EBS Master LLC (which we refer to as EBSCo), which
owns Emdeon Business Services LLC. Emdeon Business Services LLC
conducts the business that comprised our Emdeon Business
Services segment until we sold a 52% interest in that business
to an affiliate of General Atlantic LLC on November 16,
2006 (we refer to that transaction as the EBS Sale). In this
MD&A, we use the names Emdeon Business Services and EBS to
refer to the business owned by EBSCo and, with respect to
periods prior to the consummation of the EBS Sale, to the
reporting segment of our company.
Operating
Segments
We have aligned our business into four operating segments and
one corporate segment. The following is a description of each of
our operating segments and our corporate segment:
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD. WebMD provides both public and private
online portals. WebMDs public portals for consumers enable
them to obtain detailed information on a particular disease or
condition, check symptoms, locate physicians, store individual
healthcare information, receive periodic
e-newsletters
on topics of individual interest, enroll in interactive courses
and participate in online communities with peers and experts.
WebMDs public portals for physicians and healthcare
professionals make it easier for them to access clinical
reference sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical
information, learn about new treatment options, earn continuing
medical education (which we refer to as CME) credit and
communicate with peers. WebMDs private portals enable
employers and health plans to provide their employees and plan
members with access to personalized health and benefit
information and decision-support technology that helps them make
more informed benefit, provider and treatment choices. WebMD
provides related services for use by such employees and members,
including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic health
coaching as a result of the acquisition of Summex Corporation
(which we refer to as Summex) on June 13, 2006 and
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies as a
result of the acquisition of Medsite, Inc. (which we refer to as
Medsite) on September 11, 2006. In addition, WebMD
publishes: medical reference textbooks; The Little Blue
Book, a physician directory; and, since 2005, WebMD the
Magazine, a consumer magazine distributed to physician
office waiting rooms. WebMD conducted in-person medical
education through December 31, 2006, the date at which it
no longer provided this service.
|
|
|
|
ViPS. ViPS provides healthcare data
management, analytics, decision-support and process automation
solutions and related information technology services to
governmental, Blue Cross Blue Shield and commercial healthcare
payers. ViPS develops tools for disease management, predictive
modeling, provider performance,
HEDIS®
quality improvement, healthcare fraud detection and financial
management. Consultants and outsourcing services are also
provided to assess workflow, perform software
|
35
maintenance, design complex database architectures and perform
data analysis and analytic reporting functions.
|
|
|
|
|
Porex. Porex develops, manufactures and
distributes proprietary porous plastic products and components
used in healthcare, industrial and consumer applications.
Porexs healthcare products consist of components used to
vent or diffuse gases or fluids, including catheter vents,
self-sealing valves in surgical vacuum canisters, fluid
filtration components and components for diagnostic devices.
Porexs consumer products are used in a variety of office
and home products, including highlighting pens, childrens
coloring markers, air fresheners, power tool dust canisters,
computer printers and water filters. Porexs industrial
products are designed to customer specifications as to size,
rigidity, porosity and other needs, including automobile battery
vents, pneumatic silencers and a broad range of filters and
filtration components. Porex also provides technologically
advanced sterile surgical products, such as biomaterial
implantable products, used in craniofacial/oculoplastic
reconstruction and aesthetic/cosmetic surgery in hospitals,
clinics and private practice surgical offices.
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Business Services. EBS provides
solutions that automate key business and administrative
functions for healthcare payers and providers, including:
electronic patient eligibility and benefit verification;
electronic and paper claims processing; electronic and paper
paid-claims communication services; and patient billing, payment
and communications services. In addition, EBS provides clinical
communications services that improve the delivery of healthcare
by enabling physicians to manage laboratory orders and results,
hospital reports and electronic prescriptions. As a result of
the EBS Sale, beginning November 17, 2006, the results of
EBS are no longer included in the segment results but are
reflected as an equity investment in our operating results.
|
|
|
|
Corporate. The Corporate segment provides
shared services across some or all of our operating segments.
These services include executive personnel, accounting, tax,
treasury, legal, human resources, internal audit, risk
management and certain information technology functions.
Corporate service costs include compensation related costs,
insurance and audit fees, leased property, facilities cost,
legal and other professional fees, software maintenance and
telecommunication costs. Additionally, we entered into
transition services agreements whereby we provide Sage Software
and EBSCo certain administrative services, including payroll,
accounting, purchasing and procurement, tax, and human resource
services, as well as information technology support.
Additionally, EBSCo provides us certain administrative services,
including telecommunication infrastructure and management
services, data center support and purchasing and procurement
services. Some of the services provided by EBSCo to HLTH are, in
turn, used to fulfill HLTHs obligations to provide
transition services to Sage Software. These services are
provided through the Corporate segment, and the related
transition services fee we charge to EBSCo and Sage Software,
net of the fee we pay to EBSCo, is also included in the
Corporate segment, which approximates the cost of providing
these services.
|
Recent
Developments
Certain Potential Transactions. As previously
disclosed, HLTH currently intends to propose a transaction that
would allow HLTHs stockholders to participate more
directly in the ownership of WHC Common Stock. In that regard,
the WHC Board of Directors has formed a special committee (which
we refer to as the Special Committee), consisting of Stanley S.
Trotman, Jr. and Jerome C. Keller (two non-management
members of WHCs Board who do not serve on HLTHs
Board of Directors), to evaluate and negotiate any potential
transaction with HLTH. The Special Committee has retained Morgan
Joseph & Co. Inc. as its financial advisor and Cahill
Gordon & Reindel LLP as its legal counsel. HLTH has
retained Raymond James & Associates, Inc. as its
financial advisor and OMelveny & Myers LLP as
its legal counsel. There can be no assurance that any such
transaction will be agreed upon or ultimately consummated.
The potential transaction that HLTH currently intends to propose
to the Special Committee (which we refer to as the Potential WHC
Transaction) would involve the merger of HLTH into WHC, with WHC
being the surviving company. Each share of HLTH Common Stock
would be converted, in the merger, into a combination of cash
and WHC Common Stock. HLTH expects the merger consideration to
reflect, among
36
other factors, an evaluation of the realizable values of the
assets and liabilities of HLTH, other than its ownership of WHC.
HLTH expects that shares of WHC Common Stock would constitute up
to 50% of the merger consideration and their receipt would be
tax free to HLTH stockholders. HLTH expects that the cash
necessary to consummate the transaction would come from cash and
cash equivalents on hand at HLTH and WHC and from the proceeds
of the sales by HLTH of its ViPS and Porex subsidiaries and
possibly its 48% interest in EBSCo. HLTH has received
unsolicited preliminary indications of interest for each of
these assets and intends to explore potential sales transactions
(which we refer to as the Potential Sale Transactions). However,
there can be no assurance that such exploration will result in
any definitive agreement or transaction.
WHC stockholders, other than HLTH, would continue to own their
shares of WHC Class A Common Stock following the Potential
WHC Transaction, but would no longer be minority stockholders of
a controlled company and the shares of WHC Class B Common
Stock currently owned by HLTH would be retired. In addition, as
a result of the transaction, the amount of publicly traded WHC
Common Stock would be dramatically increased. However, HLTH
anticipates that the total number of outstanding shares of WHC
Common Stock would be reduced in the transaction.
Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Coverage
Litigation. On July 23, 2007, we commenced
litigation (which we refer to as the Coverage Litigation) in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle
County against nine insurance companies in which we are seeking
to compel the defendant companies (which we refer to
collectively as the Defendants) to honor their obligations under
certain directors and officers liability insurance policies
(which we refer to as the Policies). Pursuant to a stipulation
among the parties, the Coverage Litigation was transferred on
September 13, 2007 to the Superior Court of the State of
Delaware in and for New Castle County. The Policies were issued
to our company and to EPS, our former subsidiary, which is our
co-plaintiff in the Coverage Litigation (which we refer to
collectively as the Plaintiffs). EPS was sold in September 2006
to Sage Software and has changed its name to Sage Software
Healthcare, Inc. (which we refer to as SSHI).
The Plaintiffs in the Coverage Litigation are seeking an order
requiring the Defendants to advance
and/or
reimburse expenses that we have incurred and expect to continue
to incur for the advancement of the reasonable defense costs of
initially ten and now nine former officers and directors of our
former EPS subsidiary who were indicted in connection with the
previously disclosed investigation by the United States Attorney
for the District of South Carolina (which we refer to as the
Investigation) described in Note 13, Commitments and
Contingencies located in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. In
connection with our sale of EPS to Sage Software, we retained
certain obligations relating to the Investigation and agreed to
indemnify Sage Software and SSHI with respect to certain
expenses in connection with the Investigation. We retained the
right to assert claims and recover proceeds under the Policies
on behalf of SSHI.
The Policies at issue in the Coverage Litigation consist of two
separate groups of insurance policies. Each group of policies
consists of several layers of coverage, with certain insurers
having agreed to provide specified amounts of coverage before
the coverage provided by other insurers at higher layers is
available. The first group of policies was issued to EPS in the
amount of $20,000 (which we refer to as the EPS Policies) and
the second group of policies was issued to Synetic, Inc. (the
former parent of EPS, which merged into HLTH) in the amount of
$100,000 (which we refer to as the Synetic Policies). To date,
$10,000 has been paid by insurance companies representing the
first two of the four total layers of insurance coverage under
the EPS Policies, and $6,414 has been paid by the insurance
company representing the primary layer of insurance coverage
under the Synetic Policies, in each case subject to reservations
of rights. Our insurance policies provide that under certain
circumstances, amounts advanced by the insurance companies in
connection with the defense costs of the indicted individuals,
may have to be repaid by our company. We have obtained an
undertaking from each indicted individual pursuant to which,
under certain circumstances, such individual has agreed to repay
defense costs advanced on his behalf.
We believe that the Defendants are required to advance
and/or
reimburse amounts that we have incurred and expect to continue
to incur for the advancement of the reasonable defense costs of
the indicted individuals
37
(and we have in fact been reimbursed, subject to reservations of
rights, by other insurance companies who have issued policies in
the same groups of policies as the Defendants). However, there
can be no assurance that we will prevail in the Coverage
Litigation or that the Defendants will be required to provide
funding on an interim basis pending the resolution of the
Coverage Litigation. We intend to continue to satisfy our legal
obligations to the indicted individuals with respect to
advancement of amounts for their defense costs.
Indemnification Obligations. We have certain
indemnity obligations to advance amounts for reasonable defense
costs for initially ten and now nine former officers and
directors of EPS, who were indicted in connection with the
Investigation. In connection with the sale of EPS, we agreed to
indemnify Sage Software relating to these indemnity obligations.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, based on
information we had recently received at that time, we determined
a reasonable estimate of the range of probable costs with
respect to our indemnification obligation was approximately
$57,800 to $83,000. Accordingly, we recorded a pre-tax charge of
$57,800 during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which
represents our estimate of the low end of the probable range of
cost related to this matter. We have reserved the low end of the
probable range of cost because no estimate within the range was
a better estimate than any other amount. This estimate includes
assumptions as to the duration of the trial and pre-trial
periods, and the defense costs to be incurred during these
periods. The ultimate outcome of this matter is still uncertain,
and accordingly, the amount of cost we may ultimately incur
could be substantially more than the reserve we have currently
provided. If the recorded reserves are insufficient to cover the
ultimate cost of this matter, we will need to record additional
charges to our consolidated statement of operations in future
periods.
Enterprise Systems Development Agreement. In
September 2007, our ViPS subsidiary was selected as an
information technology partner by the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (which we refer to as CMS) in its new
contracting vehicle named Enterprise Systems Development, or
ESD. CMS is expected to procure a majority of their information
technology development work for the next ten years under this
new contract. CMS set a maximum ceiling of $4 billion on
the value of contracts to be awarded under this vehicle. ViPS is
one of 8 large business awardees. The ESD contract is part of
CMS vision to achieve a transformed and modernized
healthcare system for its Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries.
The ESD partnering environment will focus on establishing and
maintaining a collaborative business arrangement between CMS and
its select partners, including ViPS, to advance performance,
improve care quality and create value-driven, transparent
healthcare in the United States. The ESD contract is a
master agreement that provides ViPS with the opportunity to
submit bids on future task orders issued by CMS, but does not
specifically allocate any task orders to ViPS. There can be no
assurance that bids submitted by ViPS under ESD will be accepted
or that ViPS will be awarded any specific amount of work under
ESD.
Background
Information on Certain Trends and Strategies
Use of the Internet by Consumers and
Physicians. The Internet has emerged as a major
communications medium and has already fundamentally changed many
sectors of the economy, including the marketing and sales of
financial services, travel, and entertainment, among others. The
Internet is also changing the healthcare industry and has
transformed how consumers and physicians find and utilize
healthcare information. As consumers are required to assume
greater financial responsibility for rising healthcare costs,
the Internet serves as a valuable resource by providing them
with immediate access to searchable and dynamic interactive
content to check symptoms, assess risks, understand diseases,
find providers and evaluate treatment options. The Internet has
also become a primary source of information for physicians
seeking to improve clinical practice and is growing relative to
traditional information sources, such as conferences, meetings
and offline journals.
Increased Online Marketing and Education Spending for
Healthcare Products. Pharmaceutical,
biotechnology and medical device companies spend large amounts
each year marketing their products and educating consumers and
physicians about them; however, only a small portion of this
amount is currently spent on online services. We believe that
these companies, which comprise the majority of WebMDs
advertisers and sponsors, are becoming increasingly aware of the
effectiveness of the Internet relative to traditional media in
providing health, clinical and product-related information to
consumers and physicians, and this increasing awareness will
result in increasing demand for WebMDs services.
38
Changes in Health Plan Design; Health Management
Initiatives. While overall healthcare costs have
been rising at a rapid annual rate, employers costs of
providing healthcare benefits to their employees have been
increasing at an even faster rate. In response to these
increases, employers are seeking to shift a greater portion of
healthcare costs onto their employees and to redefine
traditional health benefits. Employers and health plans want to
motivate their members and employees to evaluate their
healthcare decisions more carefully in order to be more
cost-effective. As employers continue to implement high
deductible and consumer-directed healthcare plans (referred to
as CDHPs) and related Health Savings Accounts (referred to as
HSAs) to achieve these goals, we believe that they will continue
to implement services like those we provide through our private
online portals. In addition, health plans and employers have
begun to recognize that encouraging the good health of their
members and employees not only benefits the members and
employees but also has financial benefits for the health plans
and employers. Accordingly, many employers and health plans have
been enhancing health management programs and taking steps to
provide healthcare information and education to employees and
members, including through online services.
Seasonality
The timing of our revenue is affected by seasonal factors in
both the WebMD and Porex segments. Advertising and sponsorship
revenue within the WebMD segment is seasonal, primarily as a
result of the annual budget approval process of the advertising
and sponsorship clients of the public portals. This portion of
revenue is usually the lowest in the first quarter of each
calendar year, and increases during each consecutive quarter
throughout the year. WebMDs private portal licensing
revenue is also historically highest in the second half of the
year as new customers are typically added during this period in
conjunction with their annual open enrollment periods for
employee benefits. Additionally, the annual distribution cycle
for certain publishing products results in a significant portion
of WebMDs publishing revenue being recognized in the
second and third quarter of each calendar year. Porexs
business is also impacted by seasonal factors, primarily in its
writing instrument product lines as a result of back-to-school
season, which favorably impacts Porexs revenue during the
second quarter.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of HLTHs financial condition
and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, which were prepared in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of financial statements requires us to make certain
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We
base our estimates on historical experience, current business
factors, and various other assumptions that we believe are
necessary to consider in order to form a basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities,
the recorded amounts of revenue and expenses, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. We are subject to
uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic,
environmental and political factors, and changes in our business
environment; therefore, actual results could differ from these
estimates. Accordingly, the accounting estimates used in
preparation of our financial statements will change as new
events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional
information is obtained and as our operating environment
changes. Changes in estimates are made when circumstances
warrant. Such changes in estimates and refinements in estimation
methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations;
if material, the effects of changes in estimates are disclosed
in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those
related to revenue recognition, short-term and long-term
investments, income taxes and tax contingencies, collectibility
of customer receivables, long-lived assets including goodwill
and other intangible assets, software and Web site development
costs, inventory valuation, prepaid advertising services,
certain accrued expenses, contingencies, litigation and related
legal accruals and the value attributed to employee stock
options and other stock-based awards.
39
We believe the following reflects our critical accounting
policies and our more significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Our revenue recognition
policies for each reportable operating segment are as follows:
|
WebMD. Revenue from advertising is recognized
as advertisements are delivered or as publications are
distributed. Revenue from sponsorship arrangements, content
syndication and distribution arrangements and licenses of
healthcare management tools and private portals as well as
related health coaching services are recognized ratably over the
term of the applicable agreement. Revenue from the sponsorship
of CME is recognized over the period WebMD substantially
completes its contractual deliverables as determined by the
applicable agreements. Subscription revenue is recognized over
the subscription period. When contractual arrangements contain
multiple elements, revenue is allocated to each element based on
its relative fair value determined using prices charged when
elements are sold separately. In certain instances where fair
value does not exist for all the elements, the amount of revenue
allocated to the delivered elements equals the total
consideration less the fair value of the undelivered elements.
In instances where fair value does not exist for the undelivered
elements, revenue is recognized when the last element is
delivered.
ViPS. ViPS generates revenue by licensing data
warehousing and decision support software and providing related
support and maintenance for that software, and by providing
information technology consulting services to payers, including
governmental payers. We charge healthcare payers annual license
fees, which are typically based on the number of covered
members, for use of our software and provide business and
information technology consulting services to them on a time and
materials basis and a fixed fee basis. The professional
consulting services we provide to certain governmental agencies
are typically billed on a cost-plus fee structure. Data
warehousing and decision support software and the related
support and maintenance agreements are generally sold as bundled
time-based license agreements and, accordingly, the revenue for
both the software and related support and maintenance is
recognized ratably over the term of the license and maintenance
agreement. Revenue for consulting services is recognized as the
services are provided.
Porex. Porex develops, manufactures and
distributes porous plastic products and components. For standard
products, Porex recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and all significant
contractual obligations have been satisfied, and the fee is
fixed or determinable and probable of collection. Appropriate
reserves are established on anticipated returns and allowances
based on past experience. For sales of certain custom products,
Porex recognizes revenue upon completion and customer
acceptance. Recognition of amounts received in advance is
deferred until all criteria have been met.
Emdeon Business Services. Through the date of
the EBS Sale on November 16, 2006, healthcare payers and
providers paid us fees for transaction services, generally on
either a per transaction basis or, in the case of some
providers, on a monthly fixed fee basis. Healthcare payers and
providers also paid us fees for document conversion, patient
statement and paid-claims communication services, typically on a
per document, per statement or per communication basis. EBS
generally charged a one-time implementation fee to healthcare
payers and providers at the inception of a contract, in
connection with their related setup to submit and receive
medical claims and other related transactions through EBSs
clearinghouse network. Revenue for transaction services, patient
statement services and paid-claims communication services was
recognized as the services were provided. The implementation
fees were deferred and amortized to revenue on a straight line
basis over the contract period of the related transaction
processing services, which generally vary from one to three
years.
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets Our long-lived
assets consist of property and equipment, goodwill and other
intangible assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets arise
from the acquisitions we have made. The amount assigned to
intangible assets is subjective and based on our estimates of
the future benefit of the intangible asset using accepted
valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow and
replacement cost models. Our long-lived assets, excluding
goodwill, are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which
we determined based on the consideration of several factors,
including the period of time the
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
asset is expected to remain in service. We evaluate the carrying
value and remaining useful lives of long-lived assets, excluding
goodwill, whenever indicators of impairment are present. We
evaluate the carrying value of goodwill annually, or whenever
indicators of impairment are present. We use a discounted cash
flow approach to determine the fair value of goodwill. There was
no impairment of goodwill noted as a result of our impairment
testing in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments Our investments, at
September 30, 2007, consisted principally of certificates
of deposit, auction rate securities, asset backed securities,
money market funds and marketable equity securities. Each
reporting period we evaluate the carrying value of our
investments and record a loss on investments when we believe an
investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than
temporary. Our investments are classified as available-for-sale
and are carried at fair value. We do not recognize gains on an
investment until sold. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Once
realized, the gains and losses and declines in value determined
to be other-than-temporary are recorded. A decline in value is
deemed to be other-than-temporary if we do not have the intent
and ability to retain the investment until any anticipated
recovery in market value, the extent and length of the time to
which the market value has been less than cost and the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the investment.
|
|
|
|
Sale of Subsidiary Stock Our WHC
subsidiary issues their Class A Common Stock in various
transactions, which results in a dilution of our percentage
ownership in WHC. We account for the sale of WHC Class A
Common Stock in accordance with the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 51 Accounting for Sales of Stock by a
Subsidiary. The difference between the carrying amount of
our investment in WHC before and after the issuance of WHC
Class A Common Stock is considered either a gain or loss
and is reflected as a component of our stockholders
equity. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, WHC stock options were exercised and
restricted stock awards were released in accordance with
WHCs equity plans. The issuance of these shares resulted
in an aggregate gain of $3,529 and $9,398 during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and our ownership in
WHC decreased to 83.9%, as of September 30, 2007, from
84.6%, as of December 31, 2006. We expect to continue to
record gains in the future related to future issuances of WHC
Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
Equity Investment in EBSCo We account
for our equity investment in EBSCo in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (which we refer to as APB) Opinion No. 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock (which we refer to as APB 18), which stipulates that
the equity method should be used to account for investments
whereby an investor has the ability to exercise
significant influence over operating and financial policies of
an investee, but does not exercise control. APB 18
generally considers an investor to have the ability to exercise
significant influence when it owns 20% or more of the voting
stock of an investee. We believe our equity investment in EBSCo
meets these criteria. We assess the recoverability of the
carrying value of our investment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate a loss in value that is other than a
temporary decline. Factors indicating a decline in value that is
deemed to be other-than-temporary include the lack of intent and
our inability to retain the investment until any anticipated
recovery in the carrying amount of the investment, or the
inability of the investment to sustain an earnings capacity
which would justify the carrying amount. As of
September 30, 2007, the current fair value of our equity
investment in EBSCo exceeds its carrying amount of $23,169.
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation On
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123,
(Revised 2004): Share-Based Payment (which we refer
to as SFAS 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (which we
refer to as SFAS 123) and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (which we refer to as APB 25). SFAS 123R
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants
of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation
expense over the service period (generally the vesting period)
in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair
values. We elected to use the modified prospective transition
method. Under the modified prospective transition method, awards
that were granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006
are measured and accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 123R. Unvested stock
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
options and restricted stock awards that were granted prior to
January 1, 2006 will continue to be accounted for in
accordance with SFAS 123, using the same grant date fair
value and same expense attribution method used under
SFAS 123, except that all awards are recognized in the
results of operations over the remaining vesting periods.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used in this model are expected dividend yield,
expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected term.
The expected volatility for stock options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock is based on implied volatility from traded options
of HLTH Common Stock combined with historical volatility of HLTH
Common Stock. Prior to August 1, 2007, the expected
volatility for stock options to purchase WHC Class A Common
Stock was based on implied volatility from traded options of
stock of comparable companies combined with historical stock
price volatility of comparable companies. Beginning on
August 1, 2007 expected volatility is based on implied
volatility from traded options of WHC Class A Common Stock
combined with historical volatility of WHC Class A Common
Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Taxes Our deferred tax assets
are comprised primarily of net operating loss (which we refer to
as NOL) carryforwards. At December 31, 2006, we had NOL
carryforwards of approximately $1.2 billion, which expire
at varying dates from 2011 through 2026. These loss
carryforwards may be used to offset taxable income in future
periods, reducing the amount of taxes we might otherwise be
required to pay. As of September 30, 2007, a valuation
allowance has been provided against all domestic net deferred
taxes, except for a deferred tax liability originating from
business combinations that resulted in tax deductible goodwill,
as well as a deferred tax liability established in purchase
accounting that is not expected to reverse prior to the
expiration of our NOLs. The valuation allowance was established
because of the uncertainty of realization of the deferred tax
assets due to lack of sufficient history of generating taxable
income. Realization is dependent upon generating sufficient
taxable income prior to the expiration of the NOL carryforwards
in future periods. Although realization is not currently
assured, management evaluates the need for a valuation allowance
each quarter, and in the future, should management determine
that realization of net deferred tax assets is more likely than
not, some or all of the valuation allowance will be reversed,
and our effective tax rate may be reduced by such reversal. The
valuation allowance also excludes the impact of any deferred
items related to certain of our foreign operations as the
realization of the deferred items for these operations is likely.
|
|
|
|
Tax Contingencies Our tax
contingencies are recorded to address potential exposures
involving tax positions we have taken that could be challenged
by tax authorities. These potential exposures result from
applications of various statutes, rules, regulations and
interpretations. Our estimates of tax contingencies reflect
assumptions and judgments about potential actions by taxing
jurisdictions. We believe that these assumptions and judgments
are reasonable; however, our accruals may change in the future
due to new developments in each matter and the ultimate
resolution of these matters may be greater or less than the
amount that we have accrued. Consistent with our historical
financial reporting, we have elected to reflect interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of the
income tax provision. As of January 1, 2007, accrued
interest and penalties were $1,135.
|
On January 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board (which we refer to as FASB) Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (which we refer to as FIN 48), which clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. The interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also
provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. Upon adoption, we reduced the existing reserves for
uncertain income tax positions by $1,475, primarily related to a
reduction in state income tax matters. This reduction was
recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated
deficit. In addition, we reduced $5,572 of a deferred tax asset
and its associated valuation allowance upon adoption of
FIN 48.
42
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (which we
refer to as SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits many financial
instruments and certain other items to be measured at fair value
at the option of the company. Most of the provisions in
SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment to
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to all entities
with available-for-sale and trading securities. The fair value
option established by SFAS 159 permits the choice to
measure eligible items at fair value at specified election
dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected will be reported in earnings at
each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option:
(a) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few
exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the
equity method; (b) is irrevocable (unless a new election
date occurs); and (c) is applied only to entire instruments
and not to portions of instruments. SFAS 159 is effective
for financial statements issued for first fiscal year beginning
after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
impact, if any, that this new standard will have on our results
of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (which we refer to as
SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact,
if any, that this new standard will have on our results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of
operations data and expresses that data as a percentage of
revenue for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
133,308
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
299,732
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
384,627
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
868,557
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
53,340
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
169,710
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
162,670
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
505,925
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
Development and engineering
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
9,243
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
13,550
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
27,164
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Sales, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
57,352
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
74,390
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
176,091
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
|
216,603
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,826
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
18,189
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
34,231
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
51,964
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
30,638
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
13,909
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
14,082
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(2,809
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
5,267
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(5,698
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax provision
|
|
|
13,861
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
27,267
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
20,081
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
62,571
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
15,123
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,679
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
358,048
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
$
|
380,467
|
|
|
|
126.9
|
|
|
$
|
(23,190
|
)
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,143
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Revenue is currently derived from our three operating segments:
WebMD, ViPS and Porex, and was derived through our EBS segment
through the date of the EBS Sale on November 16, 2006.
WebMD services include: advertising, sponsorship, CME,
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services, content
syndication and distribution, and licenses of private online
portals to employers, healthcare payers and others, along with
related services including lifestyle education and personalized
telephonic health coaching. In addition, WebMD derives revenue
from sales of, and advertising in, its physician directories,
subscriptions to its professional medical reference textbooks,
advertisements in WebMD the Magazine and from in-person
CME programs in 2006. In-person CME services were no longer
offered by WebMD as of December 31, 2006. ViPS provides
healthcare data management, analytics, decision-support and
process automation solutions and related information technology
services to governmental, Blue Cross Blue Shield and commercial
healthcare payers and performs software maintenance and
consulting services for governmental agencies involved in
healthcare. Porex revenue includes the sale of porous plastic
components used to control the flow of fluids and gases for use
in healthcare, industrial and consumer applications, as well as
finished products used in the medical device and surgical
markets. EBS, which was a segment through November 16,
2006, the date of the EBS Sale, provided solutions that automate
key business and administrative functions for healthcare payers
and providers, including: electronic patient eligibility and
benefit verification; electronic and paper claims processing;
electronic and paper paid-claims communication services; and
patient billing, payment and communications services. EBS also
provided clinical communications services that enable physicians
to manage laboratory orders and results, hospital reports and
electronic prescriptions. A significant portion of EBS revenue
was generated from the countrys largest national and
regional healthcare payers.
Cost of operations consists of costs related to services and
products we provide to customers and costs associated with the
operation and maintenance of our networks. These costs include
salaries and related expenses, including non-cash stock-based
compensation expenses, for network operations personnel and
customer support personnel, telecommunication costs, maintenance
of network equipment, a portion of facilities expenses, leased
facilities and personnel costs and non-cash expenses related to
prepaid advertising costs. In addition, cost of operations
includes raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead,
such as fringe benefits and indirect labor related to our Porex
segment. Prior to the EBS Sale on November 16, 2006, cost
of operations included cost of postage related to our automated
print-and-mail
services and paid-claims communication services and sales
commissions paid to certain distributors of EBS products.
Development and engineering expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related expenses, including non-cash stock-based
compensation expenses, associated with the development of
applications and services. Expenses include compensation paid to
development and engineering personnel, fees to outside
contractors and consultants, and the maintenance of capital
equipment used in the development process.
Sales, marketing, general and administrative expenses consist
primarily of advertising, product and brand promotion, salaries
and related expenses, including non-cash stock-based
compensation expenses, for sales, administrative, finance,
legal, information technology, human resources and executive
personnel. These expenses include items related to account
management and marketing personnel, commissions, costs and
expenses for marketing programs and trade shows, and fees for
professional marketing and advertising services, as well as fees
for professional services, costs of general insurance and costs
of accounting and internal control systems to support our
operations. Also included are non-cash expenses related to
advertising services acquired in exchange for our equity
securities.
44
Our discussions throughout MD&A make references to certain
non-cash expenses. We consider non-cash expenses to be those
expenses that result from the issuance of our equity
instruments. The following is a summary of our principal
non-cash expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
expense. Non-cash stock-based compensation
reflects the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006,
which requires all share-based payments to employees, including
grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as
compensation expense over the service period (generally the
vesting period) in the consolidated financial statements based
on their fair values. The following table summarizes the
non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of
operations, development and engineering, and sales, marketing,
general and administrative expense for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
$
|
1,518
|
|
|
$
|
3,010
|
|
|
$
|
4,168
|
|
|
$
|
9,353
|
|
Development and engineering
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Sales, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
23,403
|
|
|
|
25,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,717
|
|
|
$
|
11,226
|
|
|
$
|
27,863
|
|
|
$
|
35,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash advertising expense. Expense related
to the use of WHCs prepaid advertising inventory that WHC
received from News Corporation in exchange for equity
instruments we issued in connection with an agreement we entered
into with News Corporation in 1999 and subsequently amended in
2000. This non-cash advertising expense is included in cost of
operations when WHC utilizes this advertising inventory in
conjunction with offline advertising and sponsorship programs
and is included in sales, marketing, general and administrative
expense when WHC uses the asset for promotion of WHCs
brand.
|
The following discussion of our operating results reflects the
reclassification of EPS as a discontinued operation in the prior
year periods, as a result of the EPS Sale that was completed on
September 14, 2006. In addition, our operating results
reflect an increase in revenue and an offsetting increase to
expenses, primarily within cost of operations, of $11,584 and
$39,387 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006 related to the intercompany activity between EPS and our
other operating segments, primarily EBS. This intercompany
activity was primarily comprised of
print-and-mail
services (including postage) and electronic data interchange
(which we refer to as EDI) services provided by EBS to the EPS
customer base and related rebates paid by EBS to EPS related to
EPSs submission of EDI transactions. These amounts had
previously been eliminated in consolidation prior to EPS being
reflected as a discontinued operation.
In contrast to the EPS Sale, the EBS Sale did not result in the
accounting for EBS as a discontinued operation, because the EBS
Sale was only a partial sale, through which we retained a 48%
ownership interest in EBSCo following the transaction.
Accordingly, the historical results of operations for EBS are
included in our financial statements for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006. Subsequent to the EBS Sale
on November 16, 2006, our 48% portion of EBSCos
income is reflected in the line item Equity in earnings of
EBS Master LLC. Because of this treatment, our
consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, as well as the EBS segment
results for these periods, are presented on a basis that makes
the operating results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 not directly comparable to the operating
results for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007. In the discussion of our consolidated operating results
below, in addition to noting the effect of the EBS Sale (which
is relatively large as compared to all other differences between
the periods), we have provided comparative information on items
that reflect trends in our operating results based on their
materiality to our consolidated operating results for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007. Our WebMD, ViPS
and Porex segment results were not affected by the EBS Sale and
comparisons with prior periods are not subject to the
considerations applicable to EBS and to our consolidated results.
45
The following discussion includes a comparison of the results of
operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 to the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006.
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was
$133,308, compared to $299,732 in the prior year period. Revenue
decreased by $166,424 primarily as a result of the EBS Sale,
which was responsible for $187,266 of the decrease. Our WebMD
and Porex segments had higher revenue of $20,553 and $569, which
was slightly offset by lower revenue in our ViPS segment of
$536, when compared to the prior year period.
Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was
$384,627, compared to $868,557 in the prior year period. Revenue
decreased by $483,930 primarily as a result of the EBS Sale,
which was responsible for $557,975 of the decrease. Partially
offsetting the impact of the EBS Sale was higher revenue in our
WebMD, Porex and ViPS segments in the amount of $65,331, $5,035
and $3,327, respectively.
Costs and
Expenses
Cost of Operations. Cost of operations was
$53,340 and $162,670 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $169,710 and $505,925 in
the prior year periods. Our cost of operations represented 40.0%
and 42.3% of revenue for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to 56.6% and 58.2% of revenue
in the prior year periods. Included in cost of operations are
non-cash expenses related to stock-based compensation of $1,518
and $4,168 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $3,010 and $9,353 in the
prior year periods. The decrease in non-cash stock-based
compensation expense for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 is primarily due to the graded vesting
schedule that was used for all stock options and restricted
stock awards granted prior to the January 1, 2006 adoption
date of SFAS 123R, including the WebMD options and
restricted stock granted at the time of the initial public
offering, as well as non-cash stock-based compensation expense
related to EBS employees, which was included in the prior year
periods.
Cost of operations, excluding the non-cash stock-based
compensation expenses discussed above, was $51,822 and $158,502,
or 38.9% and 41.2% of revenue, for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, compared to $166,700 and
$496,572, or 55.6% and 57.2% of revenue, in the prior year
periods. The decrease in cost of operations excluding non-cash
stock-based compensation expenses, as a percentage of revenue,
was primarily due to the EBS Sale, as EBS services and products
had lower gross margins than our other operations.
Development and Engineering. Development and
engineering expense was $4,209 and $13,550 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $9,243
and $27,164 in the prior year periods. Our development and
engineering expenses represented 3.2% and 3.5% of revenue for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
compared to 3.1% of revenue in each of the prior year periods.
The decrease in development and engineering expense, was
primarily due to the EBS Sale.
Sales, Marketing, General and
Administrative. Sales, marketing, general and
administrative expense was $57,352 and $176,091 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to
$74,390 and $216,603 in the prior year periods. Our sales,
marketing, general and administrative expenses represented 42.9%
and 45.9% of revenue for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to 24.8% and 25.0% of revenue
in the prior year periods. Non-cash expense related to
advertising was $169 and $2,489 for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, compared to $1,660 and $4,454 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006. This
decrease was due to lower utilization of our prepaid advertising
inventory. Non-cash stock-based compensation was $8,043 and
$23,403 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007, compared to $7,930 and $25,028 in the prior year periods.
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense was lower during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, when
compared to the prior year periods as a result of the EBS Sale,
as well as the graded vesting schedule that was used for all
stock options and restricted stock awards granted prior to the
January 1, 2006 adoption of SFAS 123R.
46
This decrease was offset by additional stock compensation
expense related to new equity awards granted during the later
part of 2006 and during 2007.
Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense, excluding
the non-cash expenses discussed above, was $49,140 and $150,199,
or 36.9% and 39.1% of revenue, for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, compared to $64,800 and $187,121,
or 21.6% and 21.5% of revenue, in the prior year periods. The
increase in sales, marketing, general and administrative
expense, excluding the non-cash expenses discussed above, as a
percentage of revenue, was primarily due to the EBS Sale, as EBS
had lower sales, marketing, general and administrative expenses
as a percentage of revenue than our other operations. The EBS
Sale was also the primary reason for the decrease in sales,
marketing, general and administrative expense, in absolute
dollars. Also contributing to the decrease in sales, marketing,
general and administrative expense, in absolute dollars, was
lower shared service costs and other corporate expenses due to
the EBS Sale and EPS Sale. This decrease was offset by higher
expenses within our WebMD segment related to recent acquisitions
that were not included, or only partially included in the prior
year periods, as well as higher compensation related costs due
to increased staffing and sales commissions related to higher
revenue.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expense was $11,826 and $34,231, or 8.9% of
revenue, for each of the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $18,189 and $51,964, or
6.1% and 6.0% of revenue, for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006. The decrease in depreciation and
amortization expense was primarily due to the EBS Sale.
Partially offsetting this decrease to depreciation and
amortization expense for the three and nine months
September 30, 2007, were WebMDs recent acquisitions
and capital improvements within our WebMD segment, which
resulted in additional depreciation and amortization expense for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, as
compared to the prior year periods.
Interest Income. Interest income increased to
$10,864 and $30,638 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, from $6,599 and $15,450 in the prior
year periods. The increase was due to higher average investment
balances and higher rates of return for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the prior
year periods.
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $4,573
and $13,909 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was consistent with interest expense of
$4,723 and $14,082 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006. Interest expense for both the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 primarily
included the interest expense and the amortization of debt
issuance costs for our $350,000 of 1.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2023 and our $300,000 of
31/8% Convertible
Notes due 2025.
Other Income (Expense), Net. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007, other income, net,
was $989 and $5,267, compared to other expense, net of $2,809
and $5,698 in the prior year periods. Other income, net includes
transition services income of $985 and $4,909 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $340 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 related to the
services we provide to EBSCo and Sage Software, net of services
EBSCo provides to us, related to each of their respective
transition services agreements, and $377 and $1,123 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 related to
the reversal of certain sales and use tax contingencies
resulting from the expiration of various statutes. Other expense
of $2,126 and $4,198 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 represents advisory expenses for
professional fees, primarily consisting of legal, accounting and
financial advisory services related to our exploration of
strategic alternatives for our former EBS segment. Also included
in other income (expense), net was $373 and $1,164 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $1,023 and
$1,840 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006, of external legal costs and expenses we incurred related
to the investigation by the United States Attorney for the
District of South Carolina and the SEC.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision
of $3,935 and $6,956 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and $4,779 and $15,123 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, includes tax expense
for operations that were profitable in certain foreign, state
and other jurisdictions in which we do not have NOL
carryforwards to offset that income. Additionally, included in
the income tax provision is deferred tax expense related to a
portion of our goodwill that is deductible for tax purposes, as
47
well as deferred tax expense, which has not been reduced by the
reversal of the valuation allowance as these tax benefits were
acquired through business combinations or established through
equity.
Minority Interest in WHC Income
(Loss). Minority interest expense of $1,800 and
$2,758 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007, compared to minority interest expense of $69 and income of
$524 for the prior year periods, represents the minority
stockholders proportionate share of income or loss for the
consolidated WebMD segment. The ownership interest of minority
shareholders was created as part of our initial public offering
of the WebMD segment on September 28, 2005 and fluctuates
based on the net income or loss reported by WHC, combined with
changes in the percentage ownership of WHC held by the minority
interest shareholders. The minority interest shareholders
ownership percentage of WHC was 16.1% as of September 30,
2007, compared to 14.4% as of September 30, 2006.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of
Tax. Income (loss) from discontinued operations
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was
a gain of $440 and a loss of $56,236, respectively. Included in
loss from discontinued operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 is a pre-tax charge of approximately
$57,800, recognized in the quarter ended June 30, 2007,
related to our indemnity obligations to advance amounts for
reasonable defense costs for initially ten and now nine former
officers and directors of EPS, who were indicted in connection
with the previously disclosed investigation by the United States
Attorney for the District of South Carolina. For a description
of this matter, see Recent Developments.
Also included in income (loss) from discontinued operations for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 is a
gain related to the reversal of certain sales and use tax
contingencies resulting from the expiration of various statutes,
partially offset by stock-based compensation expense from our
equity held by EPS employees. For the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2006, income from discontinued
operations of $358,048 and $370,171 included a gain of $352,269,
net of tax, recognized in connection with the EPS Sale.
Results
of Operations by Operating Segment
We monitor the performance of our business based on earnings
before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items. Other items
include: a working capital adjustment from the sale of 52% of
EBS; legal expenses which reflect costs and expenses incurred by
our company which reflect costs and expenses related to the
investigation by the United States Attorney for the District of
South Carolina and the SEC, income related to the reduction of
certain sales and use tax contingencies and advisory expense
related to the evaluation, in 2006, by our Board of Directors of
strategic alternatives for EBS. Inter-segment revenue primarily
represents printing services provided by EBS during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and certain
services provided by our WebMD segment to our other operating
segments during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006.
48
Summarized financial information for each of our operating
segments and corporate segment and a reconciliation to net
income (loss) are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 (a)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Business Services
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
187,266
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
557,975
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
87,198
|
|
|
|
66,645
|
|
|
|
238,639
|
|
|
|
173,308
|
|
ViPS
|
|
|
24,307
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
76,851
|
|
|
|
73,524
|
|
Porex
|
|
|
21,867
|
|
|
|
21,298
|
|
|
|
69,579
|
|
|
|
64,544
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
133,308
|
|
|
$
|
299,732
|
|
|
$
|
384,627
|
|
|
$
|
868,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emdeon Business Services
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,547
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,519
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
24,077
|
|
|
|
14,633
|
|
|
|
51,839
|
|
|
|
30,759
|
|
ViPS
|
|
|
4,809
|
|
|
|
5,302
|
|
|
|
14,743
|
|
|
|
15,517
|
|
Porex
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
6,133
|
|
|
|
20,262
|
|
|
|
18,732
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(6,053
|
)
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,267
|
)
|
|
|
(33,633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,278
|
|
|
|
59,615
|
|
|
|
67,577
|
|
|
|
158,894
|
|
Interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(11,826
|
)
|
|
|
(18,189
|
)
|
|
|
(34,231
|
)
|
|
|
(51,964
|
)
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(9,717
|
)
|
|
|
(11,226
|
)
|
|
|
(27,863
|
)
|
|
|
(35,235
|
)
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
(2,489
|
)
|
|
|
(4,454
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
30,638
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,573
|
)
|
|
|
(4,723
|
)
|
|
|
(13,909
|
)
|
|
|
(14,082
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
(4,779
|
)
|
|
|
(6,956
|
)
|
|
|
(15,123
|
)
|
Minority interest in WHC (income) loss
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(2,758
|
)
|
|
|
524
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3,149
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(6,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
358,048
|
|
|
|
(56,236
|
)
|
|
|
370,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
$
|
380,467
|
|
|
$
|
(23,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
418,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The EBS segment was sold on
November 16, 2006 and, therefore, the operations of the EBS
segment are included for the period January 1, 2006 through
September 30, 2006.
|
The following discussion is a comparison of the results of
operations for each of our operating segments and our corporate
segment for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
WebMD. Revenue was $87,198 and $238,639 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, an
increase of $20,553 or 30.8% and $65,331 or 37.7%, compared to
the prior year periods. The increase in revenue was primarily
attributed to an increase in the number of brands and sponsored
programs promoted on WebMDs Web sites, as well as
increased licensing revenue from our private online portals.
Revenue from the acquisition of Subimo LLC, Medsite and Summex
contributed $8,865 and $27,817 to the increase in revenue for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007.
49
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was
$24,077 and $51,839 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $14,633 and $30,759 in the
prior year periods. As a percentage of revenue, earnings before
interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was 27.6% and 21.7%
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
compared to 22.0% and 17.7% for the prior year periods. The
increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to higher
revenue from the increase in number of brands and sponsored
programs in WebMDs public portals, as well as the increase
in companies using WebMDs private portals without
incurring a proportionate increase in overall expenses.
ViPS. Revenue was $24,307 and $76,851 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease
of $536 or 2.2% and an increase of $3,327 or 4.5%, compared to
the prior year periods. The slight decrease in revenue for the
three months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily the
result of lower revenue from professional consulting services
that we provide to governmental agencies. The increase in
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was
due to an increase in revenue from professional consulting
services that we provide to governmental agencies over the nine
month period, and, to a lesser extent, license revenue and
related support and maintenance revenue related to data
warehousing and decision-support software.
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was
$4,809 and $14,743 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $5,302 and $15,517 in the
prior year periods. As a percentage of revenue, earnings before
interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was 19.8% and 19.2%
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
compared to 21.3% and 21.1% for the prior year periods. The
decrease in operating margin as a percentage of revenue for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, was
primarily due to the changes in the type of revenue we earned,
which can have varying degrees of profitability.
Porex. Revenue was $21,867 and $69,579 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase
of $569 or 2.7% and $5,035 or 7.8%, compared to the prior year
periods. The increase in revenue for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 was primarily due to increased
sales of our consumer and surgical products, as well as a
favorable impact of exchange rates on the translation of our
foreign operations, which was partially offset for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 by lower sales of our
healthcare products.
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was
$6,445 and $20,262 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to $6,133 and $18,732 in the
prior year periods. As a percentage of revenue, earnings before
interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was 29.5% and 29.1%
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
compared to 28.8% and 29.0% for the prior year periods.
Operating margin as a percentage of revenue for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 was slightly higher
reflecting lower direct manufacturing costs relating to the mix
of products produced, which can have varying degrees of
profitability, partially offset by higher compensation related
costs.
Corporate. Corporate includes services shared
across some or all of our operating segments, such as executive
personnel, accounting, tax, treasury, legal, human resources,
internal audit, risk management and certain information
technology functions. In addition, corporate includes the net
fees we earned from the support services we provide to EBSCo and
Sage Software. Corporate expenses were $6,053 or 4.5% of revenue
and $19,267 or 5.0% of revenue for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007, compared to $11,000 or 3.7% of
revenue and $33,633 or 3.9% of revenue for the prior year
periods. The decrease in corporate expenses, in dollars, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, was the
result of the EBS Sale and the EPS Sale which occurred in the
latter half of 2006 and resulted in a significant reduction in a
portion of the shared services performed at corporate, which
previously supported those operations. The most significant
reductions in expenses were related to personnel expenses, as
well as certain outside services including legal and accounting
services. Additionally, included in corporate is transition
service income, net of expenses, of $985 and $4,909 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $340 for
both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
related to the services we continue to provide to EBSCo and Sage
Software, which were not included, or were only partially
included, in the prior year periods. The increase in corporate
expenses as a percentage of revenue was due to the impact of
lower revenue as a result of the EBS Sale, combined with the
effect of certain corporate expenses that are fixed in nature,
and accordingly, did not decrease in proportion to the reduction
in revenue.
50
Inter-Segment Eliminations. Inter-segment
eliminations primarily represents printing services provided by
EBS during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006, and certain services provided by the WebMD segment to our
other operating segments during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We began operations in January 1996 and, until 2004, we had
incurred net losses in each year and, as of September 30,
2007, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately
$9.4 billion. We plan to continue to invest in
acquisitions, strategic relationships, infrastructure and
product development.
As of September 30, 2007, we had approximately $784,458 in
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, including
$277,614 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
held by WHC, and working capital, excluding our liabilities of
discontinued operations, of $802,435. We invest our excess cash
principally in money market funds and other short term
instruments such as auction rate securities, and asset backed
securities and expect to do so in the future. As of
September 30, 2007, all our marketable securities were
classified as available-for-sale. In February of 2007, we
transferred $140,000 to WHC as an estimate of the payment in
accordance with the tax sharing agreement between HLTH and WHC,
which requires HLTH to reimburse WHC for WHCs NOLs
utilized in connection with the gains HLTH realized in 2006 on
the EPS Sale and EBS Sale transactions. During September 2007,
we finalized the amount of NOLs utilized and transferred to WHC
an additional $9,862. The total transfer of the $149,862 had no
impact on our consolidated cash position or liquidity.
Cash provided by operating activities from our continuing
operations was $56,565 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, compared to cash provided by operating
activities from our continuing operations of $135,814 for the
prior year period. The $79,249 decrease in cash provided by
operating activities from our continuing operations when
compared to a year ago primarily relates to EBS being treated as
an equity investment during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. While we are sharing 48% of
EBSCos earnings, we did not receive cash distributions
from the investment during the current year periods. Also
contributing to this decrease in cash flow from operating
activities, when compared to the prior year, were estimated
payments for income taxes, which were higher than the prior year
period due to the gain recognized for the EBS Sale during the
three months ended December 31, 2006.
Cash used in investing activities was $321,756 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, compared to cash provided
by investing activities from our continuing operations of
$592,848 for the prior year period. Cash used in investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
was attributable to net disbursements of $338,030 from
purchases, net of maturities and sales, of available for sale
securities compared to $198,190 of proceeds from maturities and
sales, net of purchases, for the prior year period. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, we received $19,921
in repayment of advances to EBSCo, which primarily consisted of
$10,000 advanced to EBSCo at closing on November 16, 2006
to support working capital needs and $10,016 of expenses paid by
us on EBSCos behalf through December 31, 2006. In
addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
we received $11,667, which was released from escrow, related to
the EPS Sale. Cash provided by investing activities from our
continuing operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 included $524,245 of proceeds received
from the EPS Sale, offset by $119,635 in cash paid for business
combinations, which primarily related to the acquisitions of
Medsite, Inc., Summex Corporation and eMedicine.com, Inc., as
well as the contingent consideration payments related to our
acquisitions of Advanced Business Fulfillment, Inc. and
MedcineNet, Inc. Investments in property and equipment decreased
to $18,112 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
from $38,231 a year ago, primarily as a result of the EBS Sale.
Cash provided by financing activities was $71,127 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, compared to cash used in
financing activities of $9,434 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. Cash provided by financing activities
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 principally
related to proceeds of $114,077 from the issuance of HLTH Common
Stock and WHC Class A Common Stock resulting from the
exercises of employee stock options as well as a tax benefit of
$4,318 from the exercise of employee stock options, partially
offset by the repurchases of HLTH Common Stock of $47,120. Cash
used in financing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, principally related to the repurchases
of HLTH
51
Common Stock of $71,843, partially offset by proceeds of $62,768
from the issuance of HLTH Common Stock resulting from exercises
of employee stock options.
Included in our consolidated statements of cash flows are cash
flows from discontinued operations of the EPS segment as a
result of the EPS Sale. Our cash flows from discontinued
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of
$9,339 represent payments of legal fees related to our indemnity
obligations of the initially ten and now nine former officers
and directors of EPS, who were indicted in connection with the
Investigation. Our remaining reserve relating to this indemnity
obligation was $48,434 as of September 30, 2007. The
ultimate outcome of this matter is still uncertain, and
accordingly, the amount of cost we may ultimately incur could be
substantially more than the reserve we have currently provided.
Our cash flows from discontinued operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 are comprised of cash flows
provided by operating activities of $25,985 and cash flows used
in investing activities of $26,010, and represent activity
related to the operations of our EPS segment prior to the EPS
Sale.
Our principal commitments at September 30, 2007 were our
commitments related to our $350,000 of 1.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due 2023 and our $300,000 of
31/8% Convertible
Notes due 2025. In addition, we have obligations under operating
leases of $67,113. We anticipate capital expenditure
requirements of approximately $23,000 to $28,000 for the full
year of 2007, of which approximately $15,000 to $20,000 relates
to WebMD.
We believe that, for the foreseeable future, we will have
sufficient cash resources to meet the commitments described
above and our current anticipated working capital and capital
expenditure requirements. Our future liquidity and capital
requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including
retention of customers at current volume and revenue levels, our
existing and new application and service offerings, competing
technological and market developments, potential future
acquisitions and additional repurchases of HLTH Common Stock. We
may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop
new or enhanced applications and services, respond to
competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or
technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.
If required, we may raise such additional funds through public
or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or
other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or
that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
Future indebtedness may impose various restrictions and
covenants on us that could limit our ability to respond to
market conditions, to provide for unanticipated capital
investments or to take advantage of business opportunities.
The above discussion does not consider any impact that the
Potential WHC Transaction or the Potential Sale Transactions may
have on our liquidity. As discussed earlier in this MD&A,
we are considering the sales of our ViPS and Porex subsidiaries
and possibly the sale of our 48% interest in EBSCo. We have
received unsolicited preliminary indications of interest for
each of these assets and intend to explore potential sales
transactions. There can be no assurance that such exploration
will result in any definitive agreement or transaction. We are
also planning to propose a transaction to a Special Committee of
WHCs Board of Directors, which would involve the merger of
HLTH into WHC for a combination of cash and WHC Common Stock. We
are unable at this time to determine how much cash would be used
to effect such a transaction. However, we expect that we would
use all of the cash raised through the potential sales of ViPS,
Porex and possibly our 48% interest in EBSCo., along with a
portion of our available cash and cash equivalents on hand at
HLTH and WHC to consummate the proposed transaction. We cannot
yet determine the effect that these transactions will have on
our liquidity until the transaction terms have been negotiated.
Factors
That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or Results of
Operations
This section describes circumstances or events that could have a
negative effect on our financial results or operations or that
could change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of
our businesses. The occurrence of one or more of the
circumstances or events described below could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows or on the trading prices of the common stock and
convertible notes that we have issued or securities we may issue
in the future. The risks and uncertainties described in this
Quarterly Report are not the only ones facing us. Additional
risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or
that we currently believe are immaterial may also adversely
affect our business and operations.
52
Risks
Related to WebMD
If WebMD is unable to provide content and services that
attract and retain users to The WebMD Health Network on a
consistent basis, its advertising and sponsorship revenue could
be reduced
Users of The WebMD Health Network have numerous other
online and offline sources of healthcare information services.
WebMDs ability to compete for user traffic on its public
portals depends upon its ability to make available a variety of
health and medical content, decision-support applications and
other services that meet the needs of a variety of types of
users, including consumers, physicians and other healthcare
professionals, with a variety of reasons for seeking
information. WebMDs ability to do so depends, in turn, on:
|
|
|
|
|
its ability to hire and retain qualified authors, journalists
and independent writers;
|
|
|
|
its ability to license quality content from third
parties; and
|
|
|
|
its ability to monitor and respond to increases and decreases in
user interest in specific topics.
|
We cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to continue to
develop or acquire needed content, applications and tools at a
reasonable cost. In addition, since consumer users of
WebMDs public portals may be attracted to The WebMD
Health Network as a result of a specific condition or for a
specific purpose, it is difficult for WebMD to predict the rate
at which they will return to the public portals. Because WebMD
generates revenue by, among other things, selling sponsorships
of specific pages, sections or events on The WebMD Health
Network, a decline in user traffic levels or a reduction in
the number of pages viewed by users could cause WebMDs
revenue to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on
its results of operations.
Developing
and implementing new and updated applications, features and
services for WebMDs public and private portals may be more
difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than
expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue
to justify the costs
Attracting and retaining users of WebMDs public portals
and clients for its private portals requires WebMD to continue
to improve the technology underlying those portals and to
continue to develop new and updated applications, features and
services for those portals. If WebMD is unable to do so on a
timely basis or if WebMD is unable to implement new
applications, features and services without disruption to its
existing ones, it may lose potential users and clients.
WebMD relies on a combination of internal development, strategic
relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop its portals
and related applications, features and services. WebMDs
development
and/or
implementation of new technologies, applications, features and
services may cost more than expected, may take longer than
originally expected, may require more testing than originally
anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional
personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that
the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies,
applications, features or services will justify the amounts
spent.
WebMD
faces significant competition for its products and
services
The markets in which WebMD operates are intensely competitive,
continually evolving and, in some cases, subject to rapid change.
|
|
|
|
|
WebMDs public portals face competition from numerous other
companies, both in attracting users and in generating revenue
from advertisers and sponsors. WebMD competes for users with
online services and Web sites that provide health-related
information, including commercial sites as well as public sector
and not-for-profit sites. WebMD competes for advertisers and
sponsors with both health-related Web sites and general purpose
consumer online services and portals and with other high-traffic
Web sites that include both healthcare-related and
non-healthcare-related content and services.
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
WebMDs private portals compete with: providers of
healthcare decision-support tools and online health management
applications; wellness and disease management vendors; and
health information services and health management offerings of
healthcare benefits companies and their affiliates.
|
|
|
|
WebMDs Publishing and Other Services segments
products and services compete with numerous other online and
offline sources of healthcare information, including traditional
medical reference publications, print journals and other
specialized publications targeted to physicians, some of which
have a more complete range of titles and better access to
traditional distribution channels than WebMD has.
|
Many of WebMDs competitors have greater financial,
technical, product development, marketing and other resources
than it does. These organizations may be better known than WebMD
is and have more customers or users than WebMD does. WebMD
cannot provide assurance that it will be able to compete
successfully against these organizations or any alliances they
have formed or may form. Since there are no substantial barriers
to entry into the markets in which WebMDs public portals
participate, we expect that competitors will continue to enter
these markets.
Failure
to maintain and enhance the WebMD brand could have a
material adverse effect on WebMDs business
We believe that the WebMD brand identity that WebMD
has developed has contributed to the success of its business and
has helped it achieve recognition as a trusted source of health
and wellness information. We also believe that maintaining and
enhancing that brand is important to expanding the user base for
WebMDs public portals, to its relationships with sponsors
and advertisers and to its ability to gain additional employer
and healthcare payer clients for our private portals. WebMD has
expended considerable resources on establishing and enhancing
the WebMD brand and its other brands, and it has
developed policies and procedures designed to preserve and
enhance its brands, including editorial procedures designed to
provide quality control of the information it publishes. WebMD
expects to continue to devote resources and efforts to maintain
and enhance its brand. However, WebMD may not be able to
successfully maintain or enhance awareness of its brands and
circumstances or events, including ones outside of its control,
may have a negative effect on its brands. If WebMD is unable to
maintain or enhance awareness of its brand, and do so in a
cost-effective manner, its business could be adversely affected.
WebMDs
online businesses have a limited operating history
WebMDs online businesses have a limited operating history
and participate in relatively new and rapidly growing markets.
These businesses have undergone significant changes during their
short history as a result of changes in the types of services
provided, technological changes and changes in market conditions
and are expected to continue to change for similar reasons. Many
companies with business plans based on providing healthcare
information and related services through the Internet have
failed to be profitable and some have filed for bankruptcy
and/or
ceased operations. Even if demand from users exists, we cannot
assure you that WebMDs businesses will be profitable.
If WebMD
is unable to provide healthcare content for its offline
publications that attracts and retains users, its revenue will
be reduced
Interest in WebMDs offline publications, such as The
Little Blue Book, is based upon WebMDs ability to make
available up-to-date health content that meets the needs of its
physician users. Although WebMD has been able to continue to
update and maintain the physician practice information that it
publishes in The Little Blue Book, if WebMD is unable to
continue to do so for any reason, the value of The Little
Blue Book would diminish and interest in this publication
and advertising in this publication would be adversely affected.
WebMD the Magazine was launched in April 2005 and, as a
result, has a very short operating history. We cannot assure you
that WebMD the Magazine will be able to attract and
retain the advertisers needed to make this publication
successful in the long term.
54
The
timing of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue may
vary significantly from quarter to quarter
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of
factors, not all of which are in WebMDs control, and any
of which may be difficult to forecast accurately. The majority
of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship contracts are for
terms of approximately four to 12 months. WebMD has
relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship
contracts. We cannot assure you that WebMDs current
customers for these services will continue to use its services
beyond the terms of their existing contracts or that they will
enter into any additional contracts.
In addition, the time between the date of initial contact with a
potential advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and
the execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for
that program may be lengthy, especially for larger contracts,
and may be subject to delays over which WebMD has little or no
control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the
advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals.
Other factors that could affect the timing of WebMDs
revenue from advertisers and sponsors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved
uses for existing products;
|
|
|
|
seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health
conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing
of promotional campaigns for specific products; and
|
|
|
|
the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other
healthcare professionals.
|
Lengthy
sales and implementation cycles for WebMDs private online
portals make it difficult to forecast revenues from these
applications and may have an adverse impact on that
business
The period from WebMDs initial contact with a potential
client for a private online portal and the first purchase of its
solution by the client is difficult to predict. In the past,
this period has generally ranged from six to 12 months, but
in some cases has been longer. These sales may be subject to
delays due to a clients internal procedures for approving
large expenditures and other factors beyond WebMDs
control. The time it takes to implement a private online portal
is also difficult to predict and has lasted as long as six
months from contract execution to the commencement of live
operation. Implementation may be subject to delays based on the
availability of the internal resources of the client that are
needed and other factors outside of WebMDs control. As a
result, we have limited ability to forecast the timing of
revenue from new clients. This, in turn, makes it more difficult
to predict WebMDs financial performance from quarter to
quarter.
During the sales cycle and the implementation period, we may
expend substantial time, effort and money preparing contract
proposals, negotiating contracts and implementing the private
online portal without receiving any related revenue. In
addition, many of the expenses related to providing private
online portals are relatively fixed in the short term, including
personnel costs and technology and infrastructure costs. Even if
WebMDs private portal revenue is lower than expected, it
may not be able to reduce related short-term spending in
response. Any shortfall in such revenue would have a direct
impact on its results of operations.
WebMD may
be unsuccessful in its efforts to increase advertising and
sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies
Most of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue has, in
the past, come from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical
device companies. WebMD has been focusing on increasing
sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies that are
interested in communicating health-related or safety-related
information about their products to WebMDs audience.
However, while a number of consumer products companies have
indicated an intent to increase the portion of their promotional
spending used on the Internet, we cannot assure you that these
advertisers and sponsors will find WebMDs consumer Web
sites to be as effective as other Web sites or traditional media
for promoting their products and services. If WebMD encounters
difficulties in competing with the other alternatives available
to consumer products companies, this portion of WebMDs
business may develop more slowly than we expect or may fail to
develop.
55
WebMD
could be subject to breach of warranty or other claims by
clients of our online portals if the software and systems we use
to provide them contain errors or experience failures
Errors in the software and systems WebMD uses could cause
serious problems for clients of its online portals. WebMD may
fail to meet contractual performance standards or client
expectations. Clients of WebMDs online portals may seek
compensation from WebMD or may seek to terminate their
agreements with WebMD, withhold payments due to WebMD, seek
refunds from WebMD of part or all of the fees charged under
those agreements or initiate litigation or other dispute
resolution procedures. In addition, WebMD could face breach of
warranty or other claims by clients or additional development
costs. WebMDs software and systems are inherently complex
and, despite testing and quality control, we cannot be certain
that they will perform as planned.
WebMD attempts to limit, by contract, its liability to its
clients for damages arising from its negligence, errors or
mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not
be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not
provide sufficient protection to WebMD from liability for
damages. WebMD maintains liability insurance coverage, including
coverage for errors and omissions. However, it is possible that
claims could exceed the amount of WebMDs applicable
insurance coverage, if any, or that this coverage may not
continue to be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient
amounts. Even if these claims do not result in liability to
WebMD, investigating and defending against them could be
expensive and time consuming and would divert managements
attention away from WebMDs operations. In addition,
negative publicity caused by these events may delay or hinder
market acceptance of WebMDs services, including unrelated
services.
Any
service interruption or failure in the systems that WebMD uses
to provide online services could harm WebMDs
business
WebMDs online services are designed to operate
24 hours a day, seven days a week, without interruption.
However, WebMD has experienced and expects that it will in the
future experience interruptions and delays in services and
availability from time to time. WebMD relies on internal systems
as well as third-party vendors, including data center providers
and bandwidth providers, to provide its online services. WebMD
does not maintain redundant systems or facilities for some of
these services. In the event of a catastrophic event with
respect to one or more of these systems or facilities, WebMD may
experience an extended period of system unavailability, which
could negatively impact its relationship with users. To operate
without interruption, both WebMD and its service providers must
guard against:
|
|
|
|
|
damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
communications failures;
|
|
|
|
software and hardware errors, failures and crashes;
|
|
|
|
security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive
problems; and
|
|
|
|
other potential interruptions.
|
Any disruption in the network access or co-location services
provided by third-party providers to WebMD or any failure by
these third-party providers or WebMDs own systems to
handle current or higher volume of use could significantly harm
WebMDs business. WebMD exercises little control over these
third-party vendors, which increases its vulnerability to
problems with services they provide.
Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in
connection with these third-party technologies and information
services or WebMDs own systems could negatively impact
WebMDs relationships with users and adversely affect its
brand and its business and could expose WebMD to liabilities to
third parties. Although WebMD maintains insurance for its
business, the coverage under its policies may not be adequate to
compensate it for all losses that may occur. In addition, we
cannot provide assurance that WebMD will continue to be able to
obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
56
WebMDs
online services are dependent on the development and maintenance
of the Internet infrastructure
WebMDs ability to deliver its online services is dependent
on the development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the
Internet by third parties. The Internet has experienced a
variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to
portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and
delays in the future. The Internet has also experienced, and is
likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the
number of users and the amount of traffic. If the Internet
continues to experience increased usage, the Internet
infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on
it. In addition, the reliability and performance of the Internet
may be harmed by increased usage or by denial-of-service
attacks. Any resulting interruptions in WebMDs services or
increases in response time could, if significant, result in a
loss of potential or existing users of and advertisers and
sponsors on WebMDs Web sites and, if sustained or
repeated, could reduce the attractiveness of WebMDs
services.
Customers who utilize WebMDs online services depend on
Internet service providers and other Web site operators for
access to WebMDs Web sites. All of these providers have
experienced significant outages in the past and could experience
outages, delays and other difficulties in the future due to
system failures unrelated to WebMDs systems. Any such
outages or other failures on their part could reduce traffic to
WebMDs Web sites.
Implementation
of additions to or changes in hardware and software platforms
used to deliver WebMDs online services may result in
performance problems and may not provide the additional
functionality that was expected
From time to time, WebMD implements additions to or changes in
the hardware and software platforms that it uses for providing
its online services. During and after the implementation of
additions or changes, a platform may not perform as expected,
which could result in interruptions in operations, an increase
in response time or an inability to track performance metrics.
In addition, in connection with integrating acquired businesses,
WebMD may move their operations to its hardware and software
platforms or make other changes, any of which could result in
interruptions in those operations. Any significant interruption
in WebMDs ability to operate any of its online services
could have an adverse effect on its relationships with users and
clients and, as a result, on its financial results. WebMD relies
on a combination of purchasing, licensing, internal development,
and acquisitions to develop its hardware and software platforms.
WebMDs implementation of additions to or changes in these
platforms may cost more than originally expected, may take
longer than originally expected, and may require more testing
than originally anticipated. In addition, we cannot provide
assurance that additions to or changes in these platforms will
provide the additional functionality and other benefits that
were originally expected.
If the
systems WebMD uses to provide online portals experience security
breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, its business
could suffer
WebMD retains and transmits confidential information, including
personal health records, in the processing centers and other
facilities it uses to provide online services. It is critical
that these facilities and infrastructure remain secure and be
perceived by the marketplace as secure. A security breach could
damage WebMDs reputation or result in liability. WebMD may
be required to expend significant capital and other resources to
protect against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate
problems caused by breaches. Despite the implementation of
security measures, this infrastructure or other systems that
WebMD interfaces with, including the Internet and related
systems, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers,
improper employee or contractor access, computer viruses,
programming errors, denial-of-service attacks or other attacks
by third parties or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise
of WebMDs security, whether as a result of its own systems
or the systems that they interface with, could reduce demand for
its services and could subject WebMD to legal claims from its
clients and users, including for breach of contract or breach of
warranty.
57
WebMD
faces potential liability related to the privacy and security of
personal information it collects from or on behalf of users of
its services
Privacy of personal health information, particularly personal
health information stored or transmitted electronically, is a
major issue in the United States. The Privacy Standards under
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(or HIPAA) establish a set of basic national privacy standards
for the protection of individually identifiable health
information by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and
healthcare providers (referred to as covered entities) and their
business associates. Only covered entities are directly subject
to potential civil and criminal liability under the Privacy
Standards. Accordingly, the Privacy Standards do not apply
directly to WebMD. However, portions of WebMDs business,
such as those managing employee or plan member health
information for employers or health plans, are or may be
business associates of covered entities and are bound by certain
contracts and agreements to use and disclose protected health
information in a manner consistent with the Privacy Standards.
Depending on the facts and circumstances, WebMD could
potentially be subject to criminal liability for aiding and
abetting or conspiring with a covered entity to violate the
Privacy Standards. We cannot assure you that WebMD will
adequately address the risks created by the Privacy Standards.
In addition, we are unable to predict what changes to the
Privacy Standards might be made in the future or how those
changes could affect our business. Any new legislation or
regulation in the area of privacy of personal information,
including personal health information, could also affect the way
WebMD operates its business and could harm its business.
In addition, Internet user privacy is a major issue both in the
United States and abroad. WebMD has privacy policies posted on
its Web sites that it believes comply with applicable laws
requiring notice to users about WebMDs information
collection, use and disclosure practices. However, whether and
how existing privacy and consumer protection laws in various
jurisdictions apply to the Internet is still uncertain. In
addition, WebMD notifies users about its information collection,
use and disclosure practices relating to data it receives
through offline means such as paper health risk assessments.
However, we cannot assure you that the privacy policies and
other statements WebMD provides to users of its products and
services, or WebMDs practices will be found sufficient to
protect it from liability or adverse publicity in this area.
Failure
to maintain its CME accreditation could adversely affect
WebMDs ability to provide online CME offerings
WebMDs CME activities are planned and implemented in
accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the
Accreditation Council for Continuing Education, or ACCME, which
oversees providers of CME credit, and other applicable
accreditation standards. In August 2007, the ACCME revised its
standards for commercial support of CME. The revised standards
are intended to ensure, among other things, that CME activities
of ACCME-accredited providers, such as Medscape, are independent
of commercial interests, which are now defined as
entities that are producing, marketing, re-selling or
distributing health care goods and services. Commercial
interests are prohibited from being accredited providers
of CME, and no entity owned or controlled by a commercial
interest can be accredited by the ACCME. In addition, the
revised standards also provide that accredited CME providers may
not place their CME content on websites owned or controlled by a
commercial interest.
As a result of the revised standards, Medscape is implementing
adjustments to the structure, management and operation of
Medscape and its CME programs intended to ensure that Medscape
and its CME programs are independent of WebMD promotional
activities as required by the revised standards. ACCME requires
accredited providers to implement any corporate structural
changes necessary to meet the revised standards regarding the
definition of commercial interest by August 2009,
and those relating to placing CME content on websites owned or
controlled by commercial interests by
January 1, 2008. WebMD believes that the adjustments it is
making to the Medscape business will meet the revised standards.
However, we cannot be certain whether ACCME will find that these
adjustments are sufficient to meet the revised standards or
predict whether the ACCME may impose additional requirements.
If ACCME concludes that WebMD has not met its revised standards
relating to CME, WebMD would not be permitted to offer
accredited ACCME activities to physicians and other healthcare
professionals, and
58
WebMD may be required, instead, to use third parties to accredit
such CME-related services on Medscape from WebMD. In
addition, any failure to maintain WebMDs status as an
accredited ACCME provider as a result of a failure to comply
with existing or additional ACCME standards or other
requirements could discourage potential sponsors from engaging
in CME or education related activities with WebMD, which could
have a material adverse effect on its business.
Government
regulation and industry initiatives could adversely affect the
volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through
WebMDs Web sites or require changes to how WebMD offers
CME
CME activities may be subject to government regulation by the
FDA, the OIG, or HHS, the federal agency responsible for
interpreting certain federal laws relating to healthcare, and by
state regulatory agencies. During the past several years,
educational programs, including CME, directed toward physicians
have been subject to increased scrutiny to ensure that sponsors
do not influence or control the content of the program. In
response to governmental and industry initiatives,
pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies have been
developing and implementing internal controls and procedures
that promote adherence to applicable regulations and
requirements. In implementing these controls and procedures,
different clients may interpret the regulations and requirements
differently and may implement procedures or requirements that
vary from client to client. These controls and procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
may discourage pharmaceutical companies from engaging in
educational activities;
|
|
|
|
may slow their internal approval for such programs;
|
|
|
|
may reduce the volume of sponsored educational programs
implemented through WebMDs Web sites to levels that are
lower than in the past; and
|
|
|
|
may require WebMD to make changes to how it offers or provides
educational programs, including CME.
|
In addition, future changes to existing regulations or to the
internal compliance programs of clients or potential clients,
may further discourage or prohibit clients or potential clients
from engaging in educational activities with WebMD, or may
require WebMD to make further changes in the way it offers or
provides educational programs.
Risks
Related to ViPS
ViPS
depends on CMS for a significant portion of its revenues and, if
ViPS reputation or relationship with CMS were harmed,
ViPS financial results would be adversely
affected
ViPS is heavily dependent upon The Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, as its primary
source of revenue (directly as a prime contractor or indirectly
as a subcontractor) and we believe that the success and
development of its business will continue to depend on its
successful participation in CMS contract programs. ViPS
generated approximately 71% of its revenue from CMS (as prime
contractor or as a subcontractor) in 2006 and approximately 72%
of its revenue in 2005. ViPS reputation and relationship
with CMS is a key factor in maintaining and growing revenues
under contracts with CMS. Negative press reports regarding poor
contract performance, employee misconduct, information security
breaches or other aspects of our business (including aspects of
HLTHs business that are unrelated to ViPS) could harm
ViPS reputation. If ViPS reputation with CMS is
negatively affected, or if it is suspended or debarred from
contracting with government agencies for any reason, such
actions would decrease the amount of business that CMS does with
ViPS and ViPS financial results would be adversely
affected. In recent years, CMS has been required to increase the
amount of business it does with small businesses. This trend is
expected to continue and may decrease the amount of business
that CMS does with ViPS and adversely affect ViPS
financial results.
In September 2007, our ViPS subsidiary was selected as an
information technology partner by the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) in its new contracting vehicle named
Enterprise Systems Development, or ESD. CMS is expected to
procure a majority of their information technology development
59
work for the next ten years under this new contract. The ESD
contract is a master agreement that provides ViPS with the
opportunity to submit bids on future task orders issued by CMS,
but does not specifically allocate any task orders to ViPS.
There can be no assurance that bids submitted by ViPS under ESD
will be accepted or that ViPS will be awarded any specific
amount of work under ESD. Contracts under ESD have significantly
greater compliance obligations for prime contractors and
subcontractors than contracts issued under the predecessor
Professional Technology Services or PITS contracting vehicle.
These compliance obligations may make performance under ESD more
difficult and costly than performance under PITS, which could
adversely affect ViPS financial results.
ViPS
depends on being retained as a subcontractor by other CMS
contractors for a significant portion of its revenues and, if
ViPS reputation or relationships with CMS or such
contractors were harmed, ViPS financial results would be
adversely affected
ViPS depends on being retained as a subcontractor by other CMS
contractors for a significant portion of its revenues. ViPS
generated approximately 17% of its revenue in 2006 and
approximately 18% of its revenue in 2005 from acting as a
subcontractor for other CMS contractors. ViPS financial
results could be adversely affected if other CMS contractors
eliminate or reduce their subcontracts with ViPS (which could
occur if, for example, ViPS reputation or relationship
with CMS is negatively affected as discussed above) or if CMS
terminates or reduces these other contractors programs,
does not award them new contracts or refuses to pay under a
contract.
CMS may
modify, curtail or terminate contracts prior to their completion
and, if ViPS does not replace them, its financial results may
suffer
Many of the CMS contracts in which ViPS participates as a
contractor or subcontractor may extend for several years. These
programs are normally funded on an annual basis. Under these
contracts, CMS generally has the right not to exercise options
to extend or expand ViPS contracts and may modify, curtail
or terminate the contracts and subcontracts at its convenience.
Any decision by CMS not to exercise contract options or to
modify, curtail or terminate ViPS major programs or
contracts would adversely affect ViPS financial results.
ViPS
CMS contracts may be terminated and ViPS may be liable for
penalties under a variety of procurement rules and
regulations
ViPS must comply with laws and regulations relating to the
formation, administration and performance of CMS contracts. Such
laws and regulations may potentially impose added costs on
ViPS business and its failure to comply with them may lead
to penalties and the termination of its CMS contracts. Some
significant regulations that affect ViPS include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Federal Acquisition Regulation and supplements, which
regulate the formation, administration and performance of
U.S. Government contracts;
|
|
|
|
The Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and
disclosure of cost and pricing data in connection with contract
negotiations; and
|
|
|
|
The Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting
requirements that govern ViPS right to reimbursement under
certain cost-based government contracts.
|
ViPS contracts with CMS are subject to periodic review,
investigation and audit by the government. If such a review,
investigation or audit identifies improper or illegal
activities, ViPS (or possibly HLTH as a whole) may be subject to
civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions,
including the termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits,
the triggering of price reduction clauses, suspension of
payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business
with U.S. Government agencies. ViPS could also suffer harm
to its reputation if allegations of impropriety were made
against it, which could impair its or HLTHs ability to win
awards of contracts in the future or to receive renewals of
existing contracts. If ViPS incurs a material penalty or
administrative sanction or otherwise suffers harm to its
reputation, ViPS financial results could be adversely
affected.
60
For additional information regarding risks relating to
government contracting, see Risks Applicable to Our
Entire Company and to Ownership of Our Securities
Contractual relationships with governmental customers may impose
special burdens and additional risks on us that are not
generally found in contracts with other customers
below.
ViPS is
subject to routine audits and cost adjustments by CMS, which, if
resolved unfavorably to ViPS, could adversely affect its
profitability
U.S. Government agencies routinely audit and review their
contractors performance on contracts, cost structure,
pricing practices and compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of, and
a contractors compliance with, its internal control
systems and policies, including the contractors
purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management
information systems. Such audits may result in adjustments to
ViPS contract costs, and any costs found to be improperly
allocated will not be reimbursed. ViPS records contract revenues
based upon costs it expects to realize upon final audit.
However, ViPS may not be able to accurately predict the outcome
of future audits and adjustments and, if future audit
adjustments exceed its estimates, ViPS profitability could
be adversely affected.
Changes
in government regulations or practices could adversely affect
ViPS financial results
The U.S. Government
and/or CMS
may revise procurement practices or adopt new contract rules and
regulations at any time. Any changes could impair ViPS
ability to obtain new contracts or contracts under which it
currently performs when those contracts are put up for
recompetition bids. In addition, new contracting methods could
be costly or administratively difficult for ViPS to implement
and could adversely affect its financial results.
If
subcontractors with which ViPS works fail to satisfy their
obligations to ViPS or to the customers, ViPS reputation
and financial results could be adversely affected
ViPS depends on subcontractors in conducting its business. There
is a risk that ViPS may have disputes with its subcontractors
arising from, among other things, the quality and timeliness of
work performed by the subcontractor, customer concerns about the
subcontractor, and ViPS failure to extend existing task
orders or issue new task orders under a subcontract. In
addition, if any of ViPS subcontractors fail to perform
the
agreed-upon
services, ViPS ability to fulfill its obligations may be
jeopardized. If that happens, it could result in a customer
terminating a contract for default. A termination for default
could expose ViPS to liability and have an adverse effect on
ViPS ability to compete for future contracts and orders,
especially if the customer is CMS.
If
ViPS systems experience security breaches or are otherwise
perceived to be insecure, its business could suffer
A security breach could damage ViPS reputation or result
in liability. ViPS designs and manages systems that retain and
transmit confidential information, including patient health
information, in its business operations with CMS and commercial
health payers and other facilities. It is critical that
ViPS systems and infrastructure remain secure and be
perceived by the marketplace as secure. ViPS may be required to
expend significant capital and other resources to protect
against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate problems
caused by breaches or to undergo external audit testing of its
security programs. Despite the implementation of security
measures, ViPS infrastructure or other systems with which
it interfaces, including the Internet and related systems, may
be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee
or contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors,
denial-of-service attacks or other attacks by third parties or
similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of ViPS
security, whether as a result of its own systems or interfacing
systems, could reduce demand for ViPS services and, as a
result, have an adverse effect on ViPS financial results.
61
Lengthy
sales, installation and implementation cycles for some ViPS
applications may result in unanticipated fluctuations in its
revenues
ViPS provides licensed software products and related services to
commercial payers and information technology services to
government customers. The period from ViPS initial contact
with a potential client and the purchase of a ViPS solution by
the client is difficult to predict. In the past, this period has
generally ranged from six to 12 months, but in some cases
has extended much longer. Sales by ViPS may be subject to delays
due to customers internal procedures for approving large
expenditures, to delays in government funding and to delays
resulting from other factors outside of our control. The time it
takes to implement a licensed software solution is also
difficult to predict and has lasted as long as 12 months
from contract execution to the commencement of live operation.
Implementation may be subject to delays based on the
availability of the internal resources of the client that are
needed and other factors outside of ViPS control. As a
result, ViPS has only limited ability to forecast the timing of
revenue from new sales. During the sales cycle and the
implementation period, ViPS may expend substantial time, effort
and money preparing contract proposals and negotiating contracts
without receiving any related revenue.
ViPS
could be subject to breach of warranty, product liability or
other claims if software or services it provides contain errors
or do not meet contractual performance standards
ViPS software products and the services ViPS provides are
inherently complex and, despite testing and quality control,
ViPS cannot be certain that errors will not be found. Errors in
the software or services that ViPS provides to customers could
cause serious problems for its customers. If problems like these
occur, ViPS customers may seek compensation from ViPS or
may seek to terminate their agreements with ViPS, withhold
payments due to ViPS, seek refunds from ViPS of part or all of
the fees charged under those agreements or initiate litigation
or other dispute resolution procedures. In addition, ViPS may be
subject to claims against it by others affected by any such
problems. In addition, ViPS could face breach of warranty or
other claims or additional development costs if its software and
services do not meet contractual performance standards, do not
perform in accordance with their documentation, or do not meet
the expectations that its customers have for them.
ViPS attempts to limit, by contract, its liability for damages
arising from its negligence, errors or mistakes. However,
contractual limitations on liability may not be enforceable in
certain circumstances or may otherwise not provide sufficient
protection to ViPS from liability for damages. ViPS maintains
liability insurance coverage, including coverage for errors and
omissions. However, it is possible that claims could exceed the
amount of the applicable insurance coverage, if any, or that
this coverage may not continue to be available on acceptable
terms or in sufficient amounts. Even if these claims do not
result in liability to ViPS, investigating and defending against
them could be expensive and time consuming and could divert
managements attention away from operations. In addition,
negative publicity caused by these events may delay market
acceptance of ViPS products and services, including
unrelated products and services, or may harm its reputation and
business.
ViPS
HealthPayer Solutions Group depends on Blue Cross Blue Shield
Plans and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association for a
significant portion of it revenue and, if its reputation or
relationship with the BCBS business community were harmed, that
business would be adversely affected.
ViPSs HealthPayer Solutions Group depends on Blue Cross
Blue Shield (BCBS) Plans and the Blue Cross Blue Shield
Association (BCBSA) for a significant portion of its revenue.
The HealthPayer Solutions Groups reputation and
relationship with BCBS Plans and BCBSA is a key factor in
maintaining and growing these revenues. Negative press reports,
employee misconduct, information security breaches or
performance problems with one or more of the HealthPayer
Solutions Groups products or services could harm the
HealthPayer Solutions Groups reputation and cause BCBS
Plans or BCBSA to reduce or terminate their use of its products
and services. In addition, similar problems involving other
businesses of HLTH (including other businesses of ViPS) could
also have an adverse effect on the HealthPayer Solutions
Groups reputation and its relationships with BCBS Plans or
BCBSA.
62
In order
to attract and retain customers, ViPS HealthPayer Solutions
Group must develop and implement new and updated software
products
ViPS HealthPayer Solutions Group must introduce new software
products and improve the functionality of its existing products
in a timely manner in order to retain existing customers and
attract new ones. If ViPS does not respond successfully to
technological and regulatory changes and evolving industry
standards, its products may become obsolete.
The development
and/or
implementation by ViPS of new software applications and features
may cost more than expected, may take longer than originally
expected, may require more testing than originally anticipated
and may require the acquisition of additional personnel and
other resources. There can be no assurance that the revenue
opportunities from any new or updated applications or features
will justify the amounts spent or that ViPS will be able to
successfully develop and implement these applications and
features.
Risks
Related to Porex
Porexs
success depends upon demand for its products, which in some
cases ultimately depends upon end-user demand for the products
of its customers
Demand for our Porex products may change materially as a result
of economic or market conditions and other trends that affect
the industries in which Porex participates. In addition, because
a significant portion of our Porex products are components that
are eventually integrated into or used with products
manufactured by customers for resale to end-users, the demand
for these product components is dependent on product development
cycles and marketing efforts of these other manufacturers, as
well as variations in their inventory levels, which are factors
that we are unable to control. Accordingly, the amount of
Porexs sales to manufacturer customers can be difficult to
predict and subject to wide quarter-to-quarter variances.
Porex
faces significant competition for its products
Porex operates in competitive markets and its products are, in
general, used in applications that are affected by technological
change and product obsolescence. The competitors for
Porexs porous plastic products include other producers of
porous plastic materials as well as companies that manufacture
and sell products made from materials other than porous plastics
that can be used for the same purposes as Porexs products.
For example, Porexs porous plastic pen nibs compete with
felt and fiber tips manufactured by a variety of suppliers
worldwide. Other Porex porous plastic products compete,
depending on the application, with membrane material, porous
metals, metal screens, fiberglass tubes, pleated paper,
resin-impregnated felt, ceramics and other substances and
devices. Some of Porexs competitors may have greater
financial, technical, product development, marketing and other
resources than Porex does. We cannot provide assurance that
Porex will be able to compete successfully against these
companies or against particular products they provide or may
provide in the future.
Porexs
product offerings must meet changing customer
requirements
A significant portion of our Porex products are integrated into
end products used by manufacturing companies in various
industries, some of which are characterized by rapidly changing
technology, evolving industry standards and frequent new product
introductions. Accordingly, to satisfy its customers, Porex must
develop and introduce, in a timely manner, products that meet
changing customer requirements at competitive prices. To do
this, Porex must:
|
|
|
|
|
develop new uses of existing porous plastics technologies and
applications;
|
|
|
|
innovate and develop new porous plastics technologies and
applications;
|
|
|
|
commercialize those technologies and applications;
|
|
|
|
manufacture at a cost that allows it to price its products
competitively;
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
manufacture and deliver its products in sufficient volumes and
on time;
|
|
|
|
accurately anticipate customer needs; and
|
|
|
|
differentiate its offerings from those of its competitors.
|
We cannot assure you that Porex will be able to develop new or
enhanced products or that, if it does, those products will
achieve market acceptance. If Porex does not introduce new
products in a timely manner and make enhancements to existing
products to meet the changing needs of its customers, some of
its products could become obsolete over time, in which case
Porexs customer relationships, revenue and operating
results would be negatively impacted.
Potential
new or enhanced Porex products may not achieve sufficient sales
to be profitable or justify the cost of their
development
We cannot be certain, when we engage in Porex research and
development activities, whether potential new products or
product enhancements will be accepted by the customers for which
they are intended. Achieving market acceptance for new or
enhanced products may require substantial marketing efforts and
expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand
by potential customers. In addition, sales and marketing efforts
with respect to these products may require the use of additional
resources for training our existing Porex sales forces and
customer service personnel and for hiring and training
additional salespersons and customer service personnel. There
can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from new or
enhanced products will justify amounts spent for their
development and marketing. In addition, there can be no
assurance that any pricing strategy that we implement for any
new or enhanced Porex products will be economically viable or
acceptable to the target markets.
Porex may
not be able to source the raw materials it needs or may have to
pay more for those raw materials
Some of Porexs products require high-grade plastic resins
with specific properties as raw materials. While Porex has not
experienced any material difficulty in obtaining adequate
supplies of high-grade plastic resins that meet its
requirements, it relies on a limited number of sources for some
of these plastic resins. If Porex experiences a reduction or
interruption in supply from these sources, it may not be able to
access alternative sources of supply within a reasonable period
of time or at commercially reasonable rates, which could have a
material adverse effect on its business and financial results.
In addition, the prices of some of the raw materials that Porex
uses depend, to a great extent, on the price of petroleum. As a
result, increases in the price of petroleum could have an
adverse effect on Porexs margins and on the ability of
Porexs porous plastics products to compete with products
made from other raw materials.
Disruptions
in Porexs manufacturing operations could have a material
adverse effect on its business and financial results
Any significant disruption in Porexs manufacturing
operations, including as a result of fire, power interruptions,
equipment malfunctions, labor disputes, material shortages,
earthquakes, floods, computer viruses, sabotage, terrorist acts
or other force majeure, could have a material adverse effect on
Porexs ability to deliver products to customers and,
accordingly, its financial results.
Porex may
not be able to keep third parties from using technology it has
developed
Porex uses proprietary technology for manufacturing its porous
plastics products and its success is dependent, to a significant
extent, on its ability to protect the proprietary and
confidential aspects of its technology. Although Porex owns
certain patents, it relies primarily on non-patented proprietary
manufacturing processes. To protect its proprietary processes,
Porex relies on a combination of trade secret laws, license
agreements, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions and
technical measures, including designing and manufacturing its
porous molding equipment and most of its molds in-house. Trade
secret laws do not afford
64
the statutory exclusivity possible for patented processes. There
can be no assurance that the legal protections afforded to Porex
or the steps taken by Porex will be adequate to prevent
misappropriation of its technology. In addition, these
protections do not prevent independent third-party development
of competitive products or services.
The
nature of Porexs products exposes it to product liability
claims that may not be adequately covered by indemnity
agreements or insurance
The products sold by Porex, whether sold directly to end-users
or sold to other manufacturers for inclusion in the products
that they sell, expose it to potential risk of product liability
claims, particularly with respect to Porexs life sciences,
clinical, surgical and medical products. In addition, Porex is
subject to the risk that a government authority or third party
may require it to recall one or more of its products. Some of
Porexs products are designed to be permanently implanted
in the human body. Design defects and manufacturing defects with
respect to such products sold by Porex or failures that occur
with the products of Porexs manufacturer customers that
contain components made by Porex could result in product
liability claims
and/or a
recall of one or more of Porexs products. Porex believes
that it carries adequate insurance coverage against product
liability claims and other risks. We cannot assure you, however,
that claims in excess of Porexs insurance coverage will
not arise. In addition, Porexs insurance policies must be
renewed annually. Although Porex has been able to obtain
adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost in the past,
we cannot assure you that Porex will continue to be able to
obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
In most instances, Porex enters into indemnity agreements with
its manufacturing customers. These indemnity agreements
generally provide that these customers would indemnify Porex
from liabilities that may arise from the sale of their products
that incorporate Porex components to, or the use of such
products by, end-users. While Porex generally seeks contractual
indemnification from its customers, any such indemnification is
limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the
indemnifying party. If Porex does not have adequate contractual
indemnification available, product liability claims, to the
extent not covered by insurance, could have a material adverse
effect on its business and its financial results.
Economic,
political and other risks associated with Porexs
international sales and geographically diverse operations could
adversely affect Porexs operations and financial
results
Since Porex sells its products worldwide, its business is
subject to risks associated with doing business internationally.
In addition, Porex has manufacturing facilities in the United
Kingdom, Germany and Malaysia. Accordingly, Porexs
operations and financial results could be harmed by a variety of
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements;
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws;
|
|
|
|
differing protection of intellectual property rights in
different countries; and
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements.
|
Environmental
regulation could adversely affect Porexs
business
Porex is subject to foreign and domestic environmental laws and
regulations and is subject to scheduled and random checks by
environmental authorities. Porexs business involves the
handling, storage and disposal of materials that are classified
as hazardous. Although Porexs safety procedures for
handling, storage and disposal of these materials are designed
to comply with the standards prescribed by applicable laws and
regulations, Porex may be held liable for any environmental
damages that result from Porexs operations. Porex may be
required to pay fines, remediation costs and damages, which
could have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations.
65
Risks
Related to Our Investment in EBSCo
We have a
minority investment in EBSCo, which is now a highly leveraged
company
In November 2006, we sold a majority interest in EBS to an
affiliate of General Atlantic LLC. The acquisition was financed
in part with approximately $925 million in bank debt, which
is an obligation of EBSCos subsidiaries and guaranteed by
EBSCo. The debt incurred in connection with this transaction
will reduce the profitability of EBSCo and the loan agreements
related to this debt contain covenants restricting payment of
dividends by EBSCo. In addition, if EBSCos subsidiaries
are not able to service this debt with cash flow from
operations, that could have a material adverse effect on
EBSCos results of operations and the value of our
investment. Moreover, as a holder of a minority interest in
EBSCo, we do not have voting control over the entity, and are
not able to make decisions regarding the affairs of EBSCo except
to the extent specifically provided for in EBSCos
corporate governance documents.
EBS may
not be able to maintain its existing relationships with
healthcare payers or to develop new ones on satisfactory
terms
There can be no assurance that healthcare payers will continue
to use EBS and other independent companies to transmit
healthcare EDI transactions or for related services. Some of
EBSs existing payer and provider customers compete with it
or plan to do so or belong to alliances that compete with it or
plan to do so or have made investments in EBSs
competitors. For example, some payers currently offer, through
affiliated clearinghouses, Web portals and other means, EDI
services to healthcare providers that allow the provider to
bypass third-party EDI service providers such as EBS, and
additional payers may do so in the future. The ability of payers
to do so may adversely affect the terms and conditions EBS is
able to negotiate in its agreements with them. We cannot provide
assurance that EBS will be able to maintain its existing
relationships with payers or develop new relationships on
satisfactory terms. To the extent that it is not able to do so,
EBSs transaction volume and financial results could be
adversely affected, which would reduce the value of our
investment in EBSCo.
EBS may
not be able to maintain its existing relationships with practice
management system vendors and large submitters of healthcare EDI
transactions or to develop new ones on satisfactory
terms
EBS has developed relationships with practice management system
vendors and large submitters of healthcare claims to increase
the usage of its transaction services. In the past several
years, there has been consolidation of practice management
systems vendors, including among some of the larger such
vendors, which may increase their bargaining power in
negotiations with EBS. To the extent that it is not able to
maintain mutually satisfactory relationships with the larger
practice management system vendors and large submitters of
healthcare EDI transactions, EBSs transaction volume and
financial results could be adversely affected, which would
reduce the value of our investment in EBSCo.
New or
updated products and services of EBS will not become profitable
unless they achieve sufficient levels of market
acceptance
The future financial results of EBSCo and the value of our
investment in it will depend, in part, on whether its new or
updated products and services receive sufficient customer
acceptance, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the business process outsourcing services for payers that it has
developed internally and through acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
electronic billing, payment and remittance services for
healthcare payers and providers that complement its existing
paper based paid claims communication and patient billing
services; and
|
|
|
|
its other pre- and post-adjudication services for payers and
providers.
|
66
There can be no assurance that payers and providers who use EBS
for sending and receiving claims will use its other services.
Providers and payers may choose to use similar products and
services offered by our competitors, especially if they are
already using products and services of those competitors and
have made investments in hardware, software and training
relating to those products and services. Even providers and
payers that are already customers of EBS may not purchase new or
updated products or services, especially when they are initially
offered or if they require additional equipment or changes in
workflow. Failure to achieve broad penetration in target markets
with respect to new or updated products and services could have
an adverse effect on the business prospects and financial
results of EBS, which would reduce the value of our investment
in EBSCo.
For services that EBS is developing or may develop in the
future, there can be no assurance that it will attract
sufficient customers or that such services will generate
sufficient revenues to cover the costs of developing, marketing
and providing those services. In addition, the introduction of
future products and services may require or make advisable
related changes in the manner in which EBS markets, delivers and
prices its products and services, including pre-existing
products and services. There can be no assurance that any
pricing strategy that EBS implements for any new products and
services will be economically viable or acceptable to the target
markets.
EBSs
ability to provide transaction services depends on services
provided by telecommunications companies
EBS relies on a limited number of suppliers to provide some of
the telecommunications services necessary for its transaction
services. The telecommunications industry has been subject to
significant changes as a result of changes in technology,
regulation and the underlying economy. In the past several
years, many telecommunications companies have experienced
financial problems and some have sought bankruptcy protection.
Some of these companies have discontinued telecommunications
services for which they had contractual obligations to EBS.
There has also been consolidation of telecommunications
companies, further reducing the number of telecommunications
companies competing for business. EBSs inability to source
telecommunications services at reasonable prices due to a loss
of competitive suppliers could affect its ability to maintain
its margins until it is able to raise its prices to its
customers and, if it is not able to raise its prices, could have
an adverse effect on EBSCos financial results and the
value of our investment in it.
If
EBSs systems experience security breaches or are otherwise
perceived to be insecure, its business could suffer
A security breach could damage EBSs reputation or result
in liability. EBS retains and transmits confidential
information, including patient health information, in its
processing centers and other facilities. It is critical that
these facilities and infrastructure remain secure and be
perceived by the marketplace as secure. EBS may be required to
expend significant capital and other resources to protect
against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate problems
caused by breaches. Despite the implementation of security
measures, EBSs infrastructure or other systems that it
interfaces with, including the Internet and related systems, may
be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee
or contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors,
denial-of-service attacks or other attacks by third parties or
similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of EBSs
security, whether as a result of its own systems or systems that
they interface with, could reduce demand for EBSs services
and, as a result, have an adverse effect on EBSCos
financial results and the value of our investment in it.
Performance
problems with EBSs systems or system failures, whether
caused by hardware, software or other problems, could cause EBS
to lose business or incur liabilities
EBSs customer satisfaction and its business could be
harmed if it experiences transmission delays or failures or loss
of data in the systems it uses to provide services to its
customers, including the transaction-related services that it
provides to healthcare payers. These systems, and the software
used in these systems, are complex and, despite testing and
quality control, EBS cannot be certain that problems will not
occur or
67
that they will be detected and corrected promptly if they do
occur. To operate without interruption, both EBS and the
third-party service providers that EBS uses must guard against:
|
|
|
|
|
damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
communications failures;
|
|
|
|
software and hardware errors, failures or crashes;
|
|
|
|
security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive
problems; and
|
|
|
|
other potential interruptions.
|
EBS has contingency plans for emergencies with the systems it
uses to provide services; however, it has limited backup
facilities if these systems are not functioning. The occurrence
of a major catastrophic event or other system failure at any of
EBSs facilities or at a third-party facility it uses could
interrupt EBSs services or result in the loss of stored
data, which could have a material adverse impact on EBSs
business or cause it to incur material liabilities. Although EBS
maintains insurance for its business, we cannot guarantee that
its insurance will be adequate to compensate it for all losses
that may occur or that this coverage will continue to be
available on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts.
Risks
Related to Providing Products and Services to the Healthcare
Industry
Developments
in the healthcare industry and its funding could adversely
affect our businesses
Most of the revenue of WebMD, ViPS and EBS is derived from
healthcare industry participants and could be affected by
changes affecting healthcare spending. In addition, a
significant portion of Porexs revenue comes from products
used in healthcare or related applications. WebMDs
advertising and sponsorship revenue is particularly dependent on
pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies
General reductions in expenditures by healthcare industry
participants could result from, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
government regulation or private initiatives that affect the
manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients,
payers or other healthcare industry participants, including
changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products
and services;
|
|
|
|
consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
|
|
|
|
reductions in governmental funding for healthcare or in tax
benefits applicable to healthcare expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting
healthcare payers or providers, pharmaceutical companies,
medical device manufacturers or other healthcare industry
participants.
|
Even if general expenditures by healthcare industry participants
remain the same or increase, developments in the healthcare
industry may result in reduced spending in some or all of the
specific markets we serve or EBS serves. For example, use of our
or EBSs products and services could be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the billing patterns of healthcare providers;
|
|
|
|
changes in the design of health insurance plans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the contracting methods payers use in their
relationships with providers;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming
to market; and
|
|
|
|
decreases in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical companies
or medical device manufacturers, including as a result of
governmental regulation or private initiatives that discourage
or prohibit promotional activities by pharmaceutical or medical
device companies.
|
In addition, healthcare industry participants expectations
regarding pending or potential industry developments may also
affect their budgeting processes and spending plans with respect
to products and services of
68
the types we provide. Furthermore, because ViPS derives a
substantial amount of its revenue from government contracts and
subcontracts, a general reduction in government spending or a
reduction in government spending on healthcare or information
technology projects could adversely affect ViPS.
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent
years and we expect that significant changes will continue to
occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the
healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot provide
assurance that the markets for our products and services will
continue to exist at current levels or that we will have
adequate technical, financial and marketing resources to react
to changes in those markets.
Government
regulation of healthcare creates risks and challenges with
respect to the compliance efforts and business strategies of
WebMD, ViPS, Porex and EBS
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to
changing political, legislative, regulatory and other
influences. Existing and new laws and regulations affecting the
healthcare industry could create unexpected liabilities for us,
could cause us to incur additional costs and could restrict our
operations. Similar risks apply to EBS. Many healthcare laws are
complex and their application to specific products and services
may not be clear. In particular, many existing healthcare laws
and regulations, when enacted, did not anticipate the healthcare
information services and technology solutions that we provide.
However, these laws and regulations may nonetheless be applied
to our products and services. Our failure to accurately
anticipate the application of these laws and regulations, or
other failure to comply, could create liability for us, result
in adverse publicity and negatively affect our businesses. Some
of the risks that we face from healthcare regulation are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
because WebMDs public portals business involves
advertising and promotion of prescription and over-the-counter
drugs and medical devices, any increase in regulation of these
areas could make it more difficult for WebMD to contract for
sponsorships and advertising;
|
|
|
|
because WebMD is the leading distributor of online CME to
healthcare professionals, any failure to maintain its status as
an accredited CME provider or any change in government
regulation of CME or in industry practices could adversely
affect WebMDs business;
|
|
|
|
because Porex manufactures medical devices for implantation, it
is subject to extensive FDA regulation, as well as foreign
regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
because we provide products and services to healthcare
providers, our sales and promotional practices must comply with
federal and state anti-kickback laws; and
|
|
|
|
in providing health information to consumers, we must not engage
in activities that could be deemed to be practicing medicine and
a violation of applicable laws.
|
Some of the risks that EBS faces from healthcare regulations are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
because EBS is in the business of applying information
technology to healthcare, various aspects of HIPAA have had and
are expected to continue to have significant consequences for
EBS; and
|
|
|
|
EBSs healthcare connectivity and transaction-related
administrative services must be provided in compliance with
federal and state false claims laws.
|
For more information regarding the risks that healthcare
regulation creates for our businesses and for EBS, see
Business Government Regulation in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
69
Risks
Applicable to Our Entire Company and to Ownership of Our
Securities
The
ongoing investigations by the United States Attorney for the
District of South Carolina and the SEC could negatively impact
our company and divert management attention from our business
operations
The United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina is
conducting an investigation of our company. Based on the
information available to HLTH as of the date of this Quarterly
Report, we believe that the investigation relates principally to
issues of financial accounting improprieties for Medical Manager
Corporation, a predecessor of HLTH (by its merger into HLTH in
September 2000), and Medical Manager Health Systems, a former
subsidiary of HLTH; however, we cannot be sure of the
investigations exact scope or how long it may continue. In
addition, HLTH understands that the SEC is conducting a formal
investigation into this matter. Adverse developments in
connection with the investigations, if any, including as a
result of matters that the authorities or HLTH may discover,
could have a negative impact on our company and on how it is
perceived by investors and potential investors and customers and
potential customers. In addition, the management effort and
attention required to respond to the investigations and any such
developments could have a negative impact on our business
operations.
HLTH intends to continue to fully cooperate with the authorities
in this matter. We believe that the amount of the expenses that
we will incur in connection with the investigations will
continue to be significant and we are not able to determine, at
this time, what portion of those amounts may ultimately be
covered by insurance or may ultimately be repaid to us by
individuals to whom we are advancing amounts for their defense
costs. In connection with the sale of Emdeon Practice Services
to Sage Software, we have agreed to indemnify Sage Software with
respect to this matter.
The
dispositions of Emdeon Practice Services and Emdeon Business
Services may create contractual liabilities, including for
indemnifications, as well as other risks and
liabilities
We may face significant expense as a result of ongoing
obligations in connection with the sale of Emdeon Practice
Services to Sage Software and the sale of a 52% interest in
Emdeon Business Services to an affiliate of General Atlantic
LLC. The agreements we entered into in connection with those
transactions require us to indemnify the purchasers for
specified losses incurred by them or resulting from the
inaccuracy of representations made by us in connection with the
transactions. We will remain exposed to these liabilities until
the indemnification periods expire under the agreements. In
addition, we may be subject to other, unforeseen risks and
liabilities relating to those transactions. Although our
management has attempted to evaluate and assess the potential
liabilities involved in those transactions, we cannot assure you
that we have properly ascertained all of the risks.
We depend
on EBS to provide us with certain services required by us for
the operation of our business
Certain administrative services required by us for the operation
of our business are provided to us by EBS under a Transition
Services Agreement. These services include telecommunication
infrastructure and management services, data center support and
purchasing and procurement services. A disruption in the
provision of these services by EBS could have an adverse effect
on the operation of our business.
We reimburse EBS in agreed upon amounts or under
agreed-upon
formulas based on EBSs costs related to those services.
The costs we are charged under the Transition Services Agreement
are not necessarily indicative of the costs that we would incur
if we had to provide the services on our own or contract for
them with third parties on a stand-alone basis.
If
certain transactions occur with respect to our capital stock,
limitations may be imposed on our ability to utilize our net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to reduce our
income taxes
As of December 31, 2006, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $1.2 billion for federal
income tax purposes and federal tax credits of approximately
$35 million. If certain transactions occur with respect to
our capital stock, including issuances, redemptions,
recapitalizations, exercises of options, conversions of
convertible debt, purchases or sales by 5%-or-greater
shareholders and similar transactions, that
70
result in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership
of our capital stock, over a three-year period, as determined
under rules prescribed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code
and applicable Treasury regulations, an annual limitation would
be imposed with respect to our ability to utilize our net
operating loss carryforwards and federal tax credits.
Our
success depends, in part, on our attracting and retaining
qualified executives and employees
The success of our company depends, in part, on our ability to
attract and retain qualified executives, writers and editors,
software developers and other technical and professional
personnel and sales and marketing personnel. We anticipate the
need to hire and retain qualified employees in these areas from
time to time. Competition for qualified personnel in the
healthcare information technology and healthcare information
services industries is intense, and we cannot assure you that we
will be able to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified
personnel to meet our requirements, or that we will be able to
do so at salary, benefit and other compensation costs that are
acceptable to us. Failure to do so may have an adverse effect on
our business. Similarly, EBSs failure to attract and
retain qualified executives and employees may have an adverse
effect on its business.
Recent
and pending management changes may disrupt our operations and
our ability to recruit and retain other personnel
In the past 18 months, we have experienced significant
changes in our senior management. The President of our company,
who was also the head of our Emdeon Business Services segment,
left in December 2005. We hired a new Chief Financial Officer in
November 2006, after our previous Chief Financial Officer took a
position with Sage Software in connection with our sale of
Emdeon Practice Services to Sage Software. We have also
announced that our Chief Executive Officer may change positions
within our company for health reasons. Changes in senior
management and uncertainty regarding pending changes may disrupt
the operations of our business and may impair our ability to
recruit and retain needed personnel. Any such disruption or
impairment may have an adverse affect on our business.
Contractual
relationships with governmental customers may impose special
burdens and additional risks on us that are not generally found
in contracts with other customers
A significant portion of ViPS revenue and a portion of the
revenue of EBS and WebMD comes from customers that are
governmental agencies. Government contracts and subcontracts may
be subject to some or all of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
termination when appropriated funding for the current fiscal
year is exhausted;
|
|
|
|
termination for the governmental customers convenience,
subject to a negotiated settlement for costs incurred and profit
on work completed, along with the right to place contracts out
for bid before the full contract term, as well as the right to
make unilateral changes in contract requirements, subject to
negotiated price adjustments;
|
|
|
|
most-favored pricing disclosure requirements that
are designed to ensure that the government can negotiate and
receive pricing akin to that offered commercially and
requirements to submit proprietary cost or pricing data to
ensure that government contract pricing is fair and reasonable;
|
|
|
|
commercial customer price tracking requirements that require
contractors to monitor pricing offered to a specified class of
customers and to extend price reductions offered to that class
of customers to the government;
|
|
|
|
reporting and compliance requirements related to, among other
things: conflicts of interest, equal employment opportunity,
affirmative action for veterans and for workers with
disabilities, and accessibility for the disabled;
|
|
|
|
broader audit rights than we would usually grant to
non-governmental customers; and
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
specialized remedies for breach and default, including setoff
rights, retroactive price adjustments, and civil or criminal
fraud penalties, as well as mandatory administrative dispute
resolution procedures instead of state contract law remedies.
|
In addition, certain violations of federal law may subject
government contractors to having their contracts terminated and,
under certain circumstances, suspension
and/or
debarment from future government contracts. We are also subject
to conflict-of-interest rules that may affect our eligibility
for some government contracts, including rules applicable to all
U.S. government contracts as well as rules applicable to
the specific agencies with which we have contracts or with which
we may seek to enter into contracts. Finally, some of our
government contracts are priced based on our cost of providing
products and services. Those contracts are subject to regulatory
cost-allowability standards and a specialized system of cost
accounting standards.
Risks and uncertainties similar to the above apply to EBSs
contractual relationships with governmental entities.
We may
not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and
proprietary rights
Intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to
our businesses. The steps that we take to protect our
intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets
may prove to be inadequate and, whether or not adequate, may be
expensive. We rely on a combination of trade secret, patent and
other intellectual property laws and confidentiality procedures
and non-disclosure contractual provisions to protect our
intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to detect potential or actual misappropriation or infringement
of our intellectual property, proprietary information or trade
secrets. Even if we detect misappropriation or infringement by a
third party, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
enforce our rights at a reasonable cost, or at all. In addition,
our rights to intellectual property, proprietary information and
trade secrets may not prevent independent third-party
development and commercialization of competing products or
services. EBS is subject to similar risks relating to its
intellectual property and proprietary rights.
Third
parties may claim that we are infringing their intellectual
property, and we could suffer significant litigation or
licensing expenses or be prevented from selling products or
services
We could be subject to claims that we are misappropriating or
infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of
others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be
expensive to defend and divert managements attention from
our operations. If we become liable to third parties for
infringing these rights, we could be required to pay a
substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing
technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or
services that use or contain the infringing intellectual
property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing products or
services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms,
or at all. We may also be required to indemnify our customers if
they become subject to third-party claims relating to
intellectual property that we license or otherwise provide to
them, which could be costly. EBS is subject to similar risks
relating to claims that it is infringing the intellectual
property of third parties.
We have
incurred losses and may incur losses in the future
We began operations in January 1996 and, until 2004, had
incurred net losses in each year since our inception. As of
June 30, 2007, we had an accumulated deficit of
approximately $9.4 billion. We currently intend to continue
to invest in infrastructure development, applications
development, marketing and acquisitions. Whether we incur losses
in a particular period will depend on, among other things, the
amount of such investments and whether those investments lead to
increased revenues.
Acquisitions,
business combinations and other transactions may be difficult to
complete and, if completed, may have negative consequences for
our business and our securityholders
We may seek to acquire or to engage in business combinations
with companies engaged in complementary businesses. In addition,
we may enter into joint ventures, strategic alliances or similar
arrangements with third parties. These transactions may result
in changes in the nature and scope of our operations and changes
in our financial condition. Our success in completing these
types of transactions will depend on, among other
72
things, our ability to locate suitable candidates and negotiate
mutually acceptable terms with them, as well as the availability
of financing. Significant competition for these opportunities
exists, which may increase the cost of and decrease the
opportunities for these types of transactions. Similar risks and
uncertainties apply to EBSCos efforts to make acquisitions
or to engage in business combinations.
Financing for these transactions may come from several sources,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents on hand and marketable securities;
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the issuance of additional common stock, preferred
stock, convertible debt or other securities.
|
Our issuance of additional securities could:
|
|
|
|
|
cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of our
stockholders at the time of the issuance;
|
|
|
|
cause substantial dilution of our earnings per share;
|
|
|
|
subject us to the risks associated with increased leverage,
including a reduction in our ability to obtain financing or an
increase in the cost of any financing we obtain;
|
|
|
|
subject us to restrictive covenants that could limit our
flexibility in conducting future business activities; and
|
|
|
|
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our outstanding
securities.
|
We do not intend to seek securityholder approval for any such
acquisition or security issuance unless required by applicable
law or regulation or the terms of existing securities.
Our
business will suffer if we fail to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies or to assess the risks in
particular transactions
We have in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire,
businesses, technologies, services, product lines and other
assets. The successful integration of the acquired businesses
and assets into our operations, on a cost-effective basis, can
be critical to our future performance. The amount and timing of
the expected benefits of any acquisition, including potential
synergies between HLTH and the acquired business, are subject to
significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain relationships with the customers of the
acquired business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to cross-sell products and services to customers
with which we have established relationships and those with
which the acquired businesses have established relationships;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain or replace key personnel;
|
|
|
|
potential conflicts in payer, provider, strategic partner,
sponsor or advertising relationships;
|
|
|
|
our ability to coordinate organizations that are geographically
diverse and may have different business cultures; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with regulatory requirements.
|
We cannot guarantee that any acquired businesses will be
successfully integrated with our operations in a timely or
cost-effective manner, or at all. Failure to successfully
integrate acquired businesses or to achieve anticipated
operating synergies, revenue enhancements or cost savings could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Although our management attempts to evaluate the risks inherent
in each transaction and to value acquisition candidates
appropriately, we cannot assure you that we will properly
ascertain all such risks or that acquired businesses and assets
will perform as we expect or enhance the value of our company as
a whole. In
73
addition, acquired companies or businesses may have larger than
expected liabilities that are not covered by the
indemnification, if any, that we are able to obtain from the
sellers.
Risks and uncertainties similar to the above apply to any
acquisitions that EBSCo may make and may reduce the value of our
investment in EBSCo.
We may
not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our
business or to exploit opportunities
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon
numerous factors, including the success of the integration of
our businesses, our existing and new applications and service
offerings, competing technologies and market developments,
potential future acquisitions and dispositions of companies or
businesses, and additional repurchases of our common stock. We
may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop
new or enhanced applications and services, respond to
competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or
technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.
If required, we may raise such additional funds through public
or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or
other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or
that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
Risks
Related to Certain Potential Transactions
We cannot
assure you that proposing the Potential WHC Transaction will
result in any transaction being agreed upon or that any such
transaction would be successfully completed
As previously disclosed, we currently intend to propose the
Potential WHC Transaction to the Special Committee of WHCs
Board of Directors formed to evaluate and negotiate any such
potential transaction with HLTH. That process may or may not
result in a definitive agreement with respect to the Potential
WHC Transaction. In addition, even if a definitive agreement is
entered into, our ability to complete such a transaction will
depend on numerous factors, some of which are outside of our
control. Even if a transaction is completed, there can be no
assurance that it will achieve the benefits contemplated by the
parties or those expected by their respective securityholders.
Furthermore, the process of exploring the Potential WHC
Transaction may be more time consuming and expensive than we
currently anticipate.
There may
be negative impacts on HLTH and WHC as a result of proposing the
Potential WHC Transaction
As a result of our intention to propose the Potential WHC
Transaction and the process expected to follow from that, the
financial results and operations of HLTH and WHC may be
adversely affected by the diversion of management resources to
that process and uncertainty regarding the outcome of the
process. For example, such process could lead us to lose or fail
to attract employees, customers or business partners. Although
we intend to take steps to address these risks, there can be no
assurance that any such losses or distractions will not
adversely affect the operations or financial results of HLTH and
WHC.
We cannot
assure you that the decision to explore the Potential Sale
Transactions will result in us pursuing a transaction or that
any such transaction would be successfully completed
As previously disclosed, we have received unsolicited
preliminary indications of interest for each of ViPS, Porex and
our 48% interest in EBSCo and we currently intend to explore
Potential Sale Transactions involving those assets. That process
may or may not result in agreements with respect to one or more
Potential Sale Transactions. In addition, our ability to
complete any Potential Sale Transactions, if our Board decides
to pursue them, will depend on numerous factors, some of which
are outside of our control, including factors affecting the
availability of financing for transactions or the financial
markets in general. Even if one or more Potential Sale
Transactions are completed, there can be no assurance that they
will have a positive effect on the price of our Common Stock. In
addition, the process of exploring the Potential Sale
Transactions may be more time consuming and expensive than we
currently anticipate.
74
There may
be negative impacts on ViPS and Porex as a result of exploring
the Potential Sale Transactions
As a result of our intention to explore the Potential Sale
Transactions and the process expected to follow from that, the
financial results and operations of ViPS and Porex may be
adversely affected by the diversion of management resources to
that process and uncertainty regarding the outcome of the
process. For example, the uncertainty of whether we will
continue to own these businesses in the future could lead us to
lose or fail to attract employees, customers or business
partners. Although we intend to take steps to address these
risks, there can be no assurance that any such losses or
distractions will not adversely affect the operations or
financial results of these businesses.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve principal and maintain adequate liquidity, while at the
same time maximizing the yield we receive from our investment
portfolio. This objective is accomplished by adherence to our
investment policy, which establishes the list of eligible types
of securities and credit requirements for each investment.
Changes in prevailing interest rates will cause the principal
amount of the investment to fluctuate. To minimize this risk, we
maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents, short-term
investments and marketable securities in commercial paper,
non-government debt securities, money market funds and highly
liquid United States Treasury notes. We view these high grade
securities within our portfolio as having similar market risk
characteristics. Principal amounts expected to mature in 2007
and 2008 are $371.2 million and $0.9 million,
respectively.
The $350,000 of 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due
2023 and the $300,000 of
31/8% Convertible
Notes due 2025 that we have issued have fixed interest rates;
changes in interest rates will not impact our financial
condition or results of operations.
We have not utilized derivative financial instruments in our
investment portfolio.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
Currently, substantially all of our sales and expenses are
denominated in United States dollars; however, Porex is exposed
to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily
the rate of exchange of the United States dollar against the
Euro. This exposure arises primarily as a result of translating
the results of Porexs foreign operations to the United
States dollar at exchange rates that have fluctuated from the
beginning of the accounting period. Porex is not engaged in
foreign currency hedging activities to date. Foreign currency
translation gains were $1.5 million and $2.4 million,
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007,
respectively, and foreign currency translation gains were
$1.0 million and $2.4 million, during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006. We believe that
future exchange rate sensitivity related to Porex will not have
a material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b),
HLTH management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of HLTHs disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e),
as of September 30, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that HLTHs disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of September 30, 2007.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(d),
HLTH management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that no changes in HLTHs
internal control over financial reporting occurred during the
third quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, HLTHs internal
control over financial reporting, except for the implementation
of a planned conversion by HLTH to a new enterprise resource
planning system (including
75
new accounting software) primarily at the corporate level. As a
result, certain business processes and accounting procedures of
HLTH have also changed. The third party vendor for this system
is the one that has been used by WHC (and, accordingly, by HLTH
for its WebMD segment) since the second quarter of 2006.
HLTHs decision to change these systems was made following
completion of the EBS Sale and EPS Sale in order to increase
efficiency and to reduce costs, and was based on experience with
the system at WebMD. The decision to change systems was not in
response to any identified deficiency or weakness in HLTHs
internal control over financial reporting.
76
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information relating to legal proceedings contained in
Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report is
incorporated herein by this reference.
The risk factors contained in Part I, Item 2 of this
Quarterly Report under the heading Factors That May Affect
Our Future Financial Condition or Results of
Operations Risks Relating to Certain Potential
Transactions are incorporated herein by this reference.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(c) The following table provides information about
purchases by HLTH during the three months ended
September 30, 2007 of equity securities that are registered
by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares that May Yet
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased (1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Programs (2)
|
|
|
Programs (2)
|
|
|
07/01/07 - 07/31/07
|
|
|
321,992
|
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
|
318,925
|
|
|
$
|
41,555,820
|
|
08/01/07 - 08/31/07
|
|
|
3,635
|
|
|
|
13.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,555,820
|
|
09/01/07 - 09/30/07
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
14.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,555,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
328,710
|
|
|
$
|
13.23
|
|
|
|
318,925
|
|
|
$
|
41,555,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 3,067, 3,635 and
3,083 shares withheld from HLTH Restricted Stock that
vested during July, August and September 2007, respectively, in
order to satisfy withholding tax requirements related to the
vesting of the awards. The value of these shares was determined
based on the closing price of HLTH Common Stock on the date of
vesting.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These repurchases were made
pursuant to the repurchase program that we announced in December
2006, at which time HLTH was authorized to use up to
$100 million to purchase shares of its common stock from
time to time. For additional information, see Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly
Report.
|
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on September 18,
2007, our stockholders voted with respect to the following
matters:
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1 To elect as Class III directors
to serve three year terms ending in 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Adler, M.D.
|
|
votes FOR
|
|
|
168,998,269
|
|
|
|
votes withheld
|
|
|
1,139,344
|
|
Kevin M. Cameron
|
|
votes FOR
|
|
|
168,992,284
|
|
|
|
votes withheld
|
|
|
1,145,329
|
|
Herman Sarkowsky
|
|
votes FOR
|
|
|
168,924,196
|
|
|
|
votes withheld
|
|
|
1,213,417
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2 To ratify the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm to serve as our independent auditor for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes FOR:
|
|
|
168,651,732
|
|
Votes AGAINST:
|
|
|
1,241,045
|
|
Abstentions:
|
|
|
244,838
|
|
Broker non-votes:
|
|
|
0
|
|
As a result, Dr. Adler and Messrs. Cameron and
Sarkowsky were each elected to serve a three year term ending in
2010 and Proposal 2 was approved.
In addition to the directors elected at the Annual Meeting, our
Board of Directors consists of: Neil F. Dimick and Joseph E.
Smith, whose terms expire in 2008; and Paul Brooke, James V.
Manning and Martin J. Wygod, whose terms expire in 2009.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index on
page E-1
are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.
78
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HLTH
Corporation
Mark D. Funston
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 9, 2007
79
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1*
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
for EBS Master LLC
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Eleventh Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger Amending the
Registrants Eleventh Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to Change the Registrants Name to HLTH
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007)
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant, as currently in
effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated WebMD Health Corp. 2005 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to WebMD
Health Corp.s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter filed on November 9, 2007)**
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of
Registrant
|
|
32
|
.2*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of
Registrant
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Relates to executive compensation. |
E-1