pre14a
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of
its filing. |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
Date Filed: |
EXPLANATORY NOTE: Katy Industries, Inc. (the Company) is filing this PRE 14A (Preliminary Proxy
Statement) on October 10, 2008. The PREM14A filing previously filed on October 10, 2008 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission was identified incorrectly by the Company as relating to a
merger or acquisition. The Company is filing this Preliminary Proxy Statement to ask stockholders
to vote upon a proposal to amend the Companys Certificate of Incorporation by effecting a
1-for-500 reverse stock split.
, 2008
Dear Stockholders:
On behalf of the Board of Directors and management of Katy Industries, Inc. (Katy or the
Company), I cordially invite you to attend a Special Meeting of Stockholders (the Meeting) of
the Company. The Meeting will be held at 10:00 am local time on , 2008 at the Holiday Inn
Mount Kisco, located at One Holiday Inn Drive, Mount Kisco, New York.
At the Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote upon a proposal to amend Katys Certificate
of Incorporation to change the number of issued and outstanding shares of Katy by effecting a
1-for-500 reverse stock split, with cash paid in lieu of resulting fractional shares. The
amendment would also change the number of authorized shares and the par value of Katys common
shares. The primary effect of the reverse stock split will be to reduce the Companys total number
of record holders by cashing out any shareholders with less than 500 shares. This will allow the
Company to cease registration of its common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. The Company anticipates that the reverse stock split will result in material cost savings
to the Company beginning in 2009, while also allowing management to focus on managing Katys
business and growing shareholder value. The Company also plans to continue to provide shareholders
with annual audited financial statements and quarterly unaudited financial statements
through the pink sheets financial reports service, and to
solicit proxies in connection with our annual stockholder meeting. The Board of Directors
unanimously recommends that you vote FOR this proposal.
I encourage you to attend the Meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to attend, however,
please read the enclosed Proxy Statement and then complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card
and return it in the accompanying postpaid return envelope as promptly as possible. This will save
the Company additional expense in soliciting proxies and will ensure that your shares are
represented at the Meeting.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
William F. Andrews
Chairman of the Board of Directors
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
305 Rock Industrial Park Drive
Bridgeton, Missouri 63044
(314) 656-4321
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of Stockholders (the Meeting) of Katy
Industries, Inc. (Katy or the Company) will be held at the Holiday Inn Mount Kisco, located at
One Holiday Inn Drive, Mount Kisco, New York on , 2008 at 10:00 a.m. local time. A Proxy
Statement and a proxy card for the Meeting are enclosed.
The Meeting is for the purpose of considering and voting upon a proposal to amend Katys
Certificate of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-500 reverse stock split of Katys common shares (the
Reverse Stock Split). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, (a) each stockholder owning fewer
than 500 common shares of Katy immediately before the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split
will receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for each Katy common share owned by such stockholder
immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split and will no longer be a stockholder of Katy; (b) each
stockholder holding 500 or more Katy shares immediately before the effective time of the Reverse
Stock Split will receive one share for each 500 shares held before the Reverse Stock Split and in
lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse Stock Split, will
receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for any shares held immediately before the Reverse Stock
Split that result in the fraction. The proposed amendment to Katys Certificate of Incorporation
is attached as Exhibit B to the accompanying Proxy Statement.
The primary effect of the Reverse Stock Split will be to reduce the Companys total number of
record holders by cashing out any shareholders with less than 500 shares. This will allow the
Company to cease registration of its common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. The Company anticipates that the Reverse Stock Split will result in cost savings on an
annual basis.
Such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof will also be considered. The Board of Directors is not aware of any other business to come
before the Meeting, and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR this proposal.
Any action may be taken on the foregoing proposal at the Meeting on the date specified above,
or on any date or dates to which the Meeting may be adjourned or postponed. Stockholders of record
at the close of business on , 2008 are the stockholders entitled to vote at the Meeting and
any adjournments or postponements thereof.
i
You are requested to complete and sign the enclosed proxy card, which is solicited on behalf
of the Board of Directors, and to mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope. The proxy will not be
used if you attend and vote at the Meeting in person.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS
APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS DOCUMENT.
ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
KATYS BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED REVERSE STOCK SPLIT,
HAS DETERMINED THAT THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT IS FAIR TO, AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF, KATY AND ITS
STOCKHOLDERS, AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE REVERSE STOCK
SPLIT.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Secretary
Bridgeton, Missouri
, 2008
IMPORTANT: THE PROMPT RETURN OF PROXIES WILL SAVE THE COMPANY THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER REQUESTS FOR
PROXIES TO ENSURE A QUORUM AT THE MEETING. A SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR
CONVENIENCE. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.
ii
PROXY STATEMENT
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
305 Rock Industrial Park Drive
Bridgeton, Missouri 63044
(314) 656-4321
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be held on
, 2008
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation on behalf of the Board
of Directors of Katy Industries, Inc. (Katy, the Company, we or us) of proxies to be used
at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the Meeting or the Special Meeting) to
be held at the Holiday Inn Mount Kisco, located at One Holiday Inn Drive, Mount Kisco, New York on
, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. local time, and all adjournments and postponements of the Special
Meeting. The Companys principal executive offices are located at 305 Rock Industrial Park Drive,
Bridgeton, Missouri 63044, and its telephone number at that location is (314) 656-4321.
At the Special Meeting, stockholders of the Company will be asked to consider and vote upon a
proposal to amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the Certificate), of
Katy to effect a 1-for-500 reverse stock split (the Reverse Stock Split) of Katys common shares,
par value one dollar ($1.00) per share (Katy shares or shares). If the Reverse Stock Split is
completed:
|
|
|
Each stockholder owning fewer than 500 Katy shares immediately before the
Reverse Stock Split will receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, in exchange for each
share owned immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split and will no longer be a
stockholder of Katy; and |
|
|
|
|
Each stockholder holding 500 or more Katy shares immediately before the effective
time of the Reverse Stock Split will receive one share for each 500 shares held before
the Reverse Stock Split and in lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse
Stock Split, will receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for any shares held
immediately before the Reverse Stock Split that result in the fraction. |
The proposed amendment to Katys Certificate to accomplish the Reverse Stock Split is attached
as Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement.
We cannot complete the Reverse Stock Split unless the holders of at least 3,975,589 shares,
which is a majority of the outstanding Katy shares on , 2008 (the Record Date), approve
the Reverse Stock Split. The executive officers and directors of Katy, who together own
approximately 39.1% of the Katy shares outstanding on the Record Date, have indicated they will
vote all shares for which they hold or share voting power in favor of the Reverse Stock Split. The
date, time and place of the Special Meeting at which the stockholders of Katy will be asked to vote
upon the Reverse Stock Split are as follows:
1
, 2008
10:00 am
Holiday Inn Mount Kisco
One Holiday Inn Drive
Mount Kisco, New York
We urge you to read this Proxy Statement carefully and in its entirety, including the attached
Exhibits. The accompanying Notice of Special Meeting and form of proxy and this Proxy Statement
are first being mailed to stockholders on or about , 2008.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS
APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS DOCUMENT.
ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION NOT CONTAINED IN
THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION SHOULD NOT BE RELIED
UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY KATY.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT A FAIRNESS OPINION |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT B PROPOSED FORM OF AMENDMENT TO RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION TO EFFECT REVERSE STOCK SPLIT |
|
|
|
|
4
IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE COMPANYS COMMON STOCK
IS NOT A DEPOSIT OR BANK ACCOUNT AND IS NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. We have not authorized any person
or entity to give any Katy stockholder information or to make any representations with respect to
the transaction contemplated in this Proxy Statement. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON ANY OTHER INFORMATION
UNLESS SUCH INFORMATION IS PROVIDED DIRECTLY BY KATY. The information contained in this Proxy
Statement is correct as of the date of the Proxy Statement, regardless of when it is received or
when the Katy shares are converted. We will update this proxy statement to reflect any factors or
events arising after its date that individually or together represent a material change in the
information included in this document. You should not interpret the contents of this Proxy
Statement or any communication from the Company, whether written or oral, as legal, tax, accounting
or other expert advice. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR OWN LAWYERS, ACCOUNTANTS, OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL
ADVISORS, AS APPROPRIATE.
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT SUMMARY TERM SHEET
The following is a summary of the material terms of the Reverse Stock
Split. While this
summary describes what we believe are the most material terms and conditions of the Reverse Stock
Split, this Proxy Statement contains a more detailed description of these terms and conditions. We
urge you to carefully review, in their entirety, this Proxy Statement, the attached Exhibits and
the documents incorporated by reference before voting.
Information About the Reverse Stock Split
The Reverse Stock Split will consist of the following steps:
|
|
|
A 1-for-500 reverse stock split of Katy shares will occur on the date that the
Delaware Secretary of State accepts for filing a certificate of amendment to our
Certificate (the Effective Date). It is the intention of management of the Company
to file such certificate of amendment within 24 hours following the conclusion of the
Special Meeting contemplated in this Proxy Statement. As a result: |
|
|
|
|
Each holder of less than 500 Katy shares immediately before the Reverse Stock Split
will receive cash in the amount of $2.00, without interest, for each share held
immediately before the Reverse Stock Split and will no longer be a stockholder of Katy. |
|
|
|
|
Each stockholder holding 500 or more Katy shares immediately before the effective
time of the Reverse Stock Split will receive one share for each 500 shares held before
the Reverse Stock Split and, in lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse
Stock Split, will receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for any shares held
immediately before the Reverse Stock Split that result in the fraction. |
5
|
|
|
If you are a holder who holds less than 500 Katy shares but do not want to be cashed
out in the Reverse Stock Split, you may remain a Katy stockholder by purchasing a
sufficient number of Katy shares, to the extent available, in the open market far
enough in advance of the Reverse Stock Split so that you hold at least 500 Katy shares
on the Effective Date. Conversely, if you are a holder and want to be cashed out in
the Reverse Stock Split, you may do so by selling a sufficient number of Katy shares in
the open market far enough in advance of the Reverse Stock Split so that you hold less
than 500 shares on the Effective Date. |
|
|
|
|
Katy intends to treat stockholders holding its common stock in street name in the
same manner as record holders. Prior to the Effective Date, Katy will conduct an
inquiry of all brokers, banks and other nominees that hold shares of Katy common stock
in street name, ask them to provide information on how many shares held by beneficial
holders will be cashed out, and request that they effect the Reverse Stock Split for
those beneficial holders. However, these banks, brokers and other nominees may have
different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the Reverse Stock
Split. Accordingly, if you hold your shares of common stock in street name, you
should contact your bank, broker or other nominee. |
Please see the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled Special Factors Effects of the
Reverse Stock Split and Reverse Stock Split Proposal Summary and Structure for more
information on the structure of the Reverse Stock Split.
Purpose of and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split
|
|
|
The Reverse Stock Split is intended to reduce the number of
record holders of Katy shares below 300 and enable us to terminate the registration of, or deregister, our
shares under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). |
|
|
|
|
We intend to file a Form 15 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
to terminate the registration of our shares and suspend our filing obligations as soon
as possible after completion of the Reverse Stock Split. Upon filing the Form 15, our
obligation to file periodic and current reports under the Exchange Act will be
immediately suspended. Deregistration of our shares will be effective 90 days after
the filing of the Form 15 unless the SEC denies the termination (because it believes
the certification is incorrect or improper). Upon deregistration of our shares, our
obligation to comply with the requirements of the proxy rules and to file and furnish
proxy statements under Section 14 of the Exchange Act will also be terminated. As a
result, Katy will no longer be a public reporting company. We will not be required to
file periodic and current reports with the SEC in the future unless we subsequently
file another registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), or again have record holders of common shares in excess of 500.
After deregistration, we plan to publicly post our annual audited financial statements
and quarterly unaudited financial statements through the pink sheets financial reports
service, and to solicit proxies in connection with our annual stockholder meeting. |
|
|
|
|
We estimate annual cost savings of approximately $800,000 per fiscal year as a
result of the deregistration of our shares and the related suspension of periodic
reporting |
6
|
|
|
requirements, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended
(the Sarbanes-Oxley Act). |
|
|
|
|
The Reverse Stock Split will reduce management time spent on compliance and
disclosure matters attributable to our Exchange Act filings and requirements, and will
therefore enable management to focus on managing Katys business and growing
shareholder value. |
|
|
|
|
The Reverse Stock Split will reduce man-hours related to the administration of small
stockholder accounts. As of the Record Date, we estimate that we have approximately
519 stockholders of record that hold fewer than 500 shares. These stockholders hold
approximately 132,839 shares, or 1.7%, of our outstanding shares but represent
approximately 82.9% of our total number of record holders. |
We are proposing this transaction because our Board of Directors has concluded, after careful
consideration, that the costs and other disadvantages associated with being an SEC-reporting
company outweigh the advantages and that the Reverse Stock Split constitutes the most expeditious,
efficient, cost effective and fair method to convert Katy from a public reporting company to a
non-public, non-reporting company. Please see the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled
Special Factors Purpose of and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split, Effects of the Reverse
Stock Split and Reverse Stock Split Proposal Background of the Reverse Stock Split, Summary
and Structure, Recommendation of the Board of Directors for more information on the principal
reasons for the Reverse Stock Split.
Fairness of the Reverse Stock Split
|
|
|
The Board of Directors believes that the Reverse Stock Split is in Katys best
interests and is fair to the affiliated and unaffiliated holders of Katy shares,
including those holders whose shares will be cashed out in the Reverse Stock Split
(Cashed Out Holders) and those who will remain holders of Katy shares after the
Reverse Stock Split (Continuing Holders). Both the Cashed Out Holders and the
Continuing Holders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares. The factors the
Board of Directors considered in determining the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split
are described in greater detail in this Proxy Statement. |
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors has set $2.00 per share (the Cash Out Price) as the cash
consideration to be paid by Katy to stockholders instead of issuing fractional shares
(i.e., portions of shares other than whole shares) in connection with the Reverse Stock
Split. The Board of Directors made this determination in good faith and received a
fairness opinion regarding the Cash Out Price (the Fairness Opinion) prepared by
Valuation Research Corporation (VRC), an independent financial advisor. |
|
|
|
|
The Fairness Opinion states that, based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth therein as of September 19, 2008, the Cash Out Price is fair,
from a financial point of view, to the Companys common stockholders. We urge you to
read the Fairness Opinion in its entirety. |
|
|
|
|
The Cash Out Price of $2.00 per Katy share represents (i) a premium of 40.8% over
the average closing price of Katy shares over the one year prior to and including
September 19, 2008, which was $1.42 per share, (ii) a premium of 53.8% over the |
7
|
|
|
average closing price of Katy shares over the three months days prior to and including
September 19, 2008, which was $1.30 per share, and (iii) a premium of 135.3% over the
closing price of Katy shares on September 19, 2008, which was $0.85 per share. |
|
o |
|
VRCs valuation analysis of the Company as a going concern performed in
conjunction with the Fairness Opinion found a value between $0.00 and $2.38 per
share, assuming all of the preferred stock had converted into common shares and
giving consideration to the net long-term debt and contingent liabilities
recorded on the Companys June 30, 2008 balance sheet. |
|
|
o |
|
The Companys net book value, based on the historical cost of the Companys
assets and liabilities, and assuming the conversion of all the convertible preferred
stock into common stock as of June 30, 2008, is $1.06 per common share. |
|
|
o |
|
The common stock of the Company would have no positive value in the case of
liquidation as the convertible preferred stock has a liquidation preference
which would be paid before common stockholders. |
|
|
|
The reduction in the total number of stockholders following the Reverse Stock Split
may further reduce the liquidity of the Companys shares and make it more difficult for
Continuing Holders to sell their shares. However, even prior to the effects of a
Reverse Stock Split, there is very limited liquidity for Katy shares. The reduced
liquidity may also cause a decrease in the price at which Continuing Holders may sell
their shares in the future. |
|
|
|
|
Katy intends to continue providing its stockholders with disclosure on a regular
basis, including annual audited financial statements and quarterly unaudited financial
statements. Katy also plans to continue to solicit proxies in connection with our
annual stockholder meeting, though it will no longer be subject to the proxy rules
under federal securities laws. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys shares will cease trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. However, the
Company intends to have its shares quoted in the pink sheets-limited information tier
after the Reverse Stock Split. This tier covers issuers that have provided limited
information with respect to the preceding six months, including quarterly financial
reports that include, at a minimum, balance sheet, income statement and total shares
outstanding for a period within the preceding six months. If, however, a qualified
broker-dealer is not willing to quote the Katy shares, stockholders will be unable to
use the pink sheets to trade Katy shares. |
|
|
|
|
Cashed Out Holders will be cashed out involuntarily and will have no further
financial interest in Katy and will not have the opportunity to participate in the
potential appreciation in the value of Katy shares unless such Cashed Out Holders
purchase Company shares in the open market after the Effective Date. |
|
|
|
|
The Reverse Stock Split provides Cashed Out Holders with an opportunity to liquidate
their Katy shares at a premium without paying brokerage commissions or other
transaction fees. |
|
|
|
|
The Reverse Stock Split will not impact affiliated holders of Katy shares
differently than unaffiliated holders of our shares on the basis of affiliate status.
The sole |
8
|
|
|
determining factor as to whether a stockholder will remain a stockholder of Katy after
the Reverse Stock Split is the number of shares held immediately prior to the Reverse
Stock Split. |
|
|
|
|
The Reverse Stock Split will have minimum effect on the Continuing Holders relative
voting power. An estimated 241,000 shares, which is only 3% of the 7,951,176
outstanding Katy shares as of September 19, 2008, will be eliminated as a result of the
Reverse Stock Split, and the relative percentage ownership of the Continuing Holders
will be approximately the same as it was prior to the Reverse Stock Split. For
example, the executive officers and directors of Katy currently own approximately 39.1%
of the outstanding Katy shares, and will own approximately 40.3% of the outstanding
Katy shares following the Reverse Stock Split. |
|
|
|
|
Under Delaware Law and the Companys Certificate, the affirmative vote of at least a
majority of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company as of the Record
Date is necessary to approve the Reverse Stock Split. Cashed Out Holders currently own
in the aggregate approximately 2% of the Companys outstanding common shares.
Consequently, the aggregate voting power of the Cashed Out Holders is not sufficient to
allow them to collectively determine the outcome of the Reverse Stock Split proposal. |
|
|
|
|
After completion of the Reverse Stock Split and the subsequent deregistration of our
shares, Katy will no longer be subject to the liability provisions of the Exchange Act
that apply to public companies or the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including
the requirement that Katys chief executive officer and chief financial officer certify
the accuracy of the financial statements contained in Katys Exchange Act filings. |
|
|
|
|
Directors, executive officers and any stockholders who own more than 10% of Katys
outstanding common shares will experience certain advantages after the Reverse Stock
Split in that they will be relieved of certain SEC reporting requirements and
short-swing profit trading provisions under Section 16 of the Exchange Act and their
compensation and stock ownership will no longer be publicly available. |
|
|
|
|
No appraisal or dissenters rights are available under Delaware Law or the Companys
Certificate to holders of the Companys shares who vote against the Reverse Stock
Split. |
Please see the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled Special Factors Fairness of the
Reverse Stock Split, Reverse Stock Split Proposal Background of the Reverse Stock Split,
Recommendation of the Board of Directors, and Opinion of Valuation Research Corporation, for
more information regarding the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split.
Voting Information
The Reverse Stock Split requires the approval of a majority of the outstanding Katy shares
entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. As of the close of business on the Record Date, there
were 7,951,176 Katy shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting, of which
3,975,589 are required to approve the Reverse Stock Split. The executive officers and directors of
Katy who have indicated they will vote in favor of the Reverse Stock Split together
9
own approximately 39.1% of the Katy shares outstanding and are entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting.
Please see the section of the Proxy Statement entitled Meeting and Voting Information for
more information
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
|
|
Katy will not recognize any gain, loss or deduction for federal income tax purposes
as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders who receive no cash as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will not
recognize any gain or loss for federal income tax purposes. The federal income tax
consequences to stockholders who receive cash in exchange for their Katy shares as a
result of the Reverse Stock Split are described in Reverse Stock Split Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences. |
Unavailability of Appraisal or Dissenters Rights
A stockholder of Katy does not have the right under Delaware Law or Katys Certificate to
demand the appraised value of the stockholders Katy shares or any other dissenters rights,
whether or not the stockholder votes in favor of the Reverse Stock Split.
Termination of Reverse Stock Split
The Board of Directors will have the discretion to determine if and when to effect the Reverse
Stock Split, and reserves the right to abandon the transaction after stockholder approval and
before the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, if for any reason the Board of Directors
determines that, in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders, it is no longer
advisable to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split. Although the Board of Directors presently
believes that the Reverse Stock Split is in Katys best interests and has unanimously recommended a
vote for the Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors nonetheless believes that it is prudent to
recognize that circumstances could possibly change prior to the Effective Date such that it might
not be appropriate or desirable to effect the Reverse Stock Split. Among other things, the Board
of Directors may withdraw the Reverse Stock Split from the agenda if any of the following occur:
(1) a change in the nature of the Companys shareholdings that would prevent us from reducing the
number of record holders below 300 as a result of the Reverse Stock Split; (2) a change in the
number of shares to be exchanged for cash in the Reverse Stock Split that would substantially
increase the cost and expense of the Reverse Stock Split (as compared to what is currently
anticipated); or (3) any adverse change in our financial condition that would render the Reverse
Stock Split inadvisable.
Unclaimed Property Laws
All cash amounts payable in lieu of fractional shares that remain unclaimed will be subject to
applicable state laws regarding abandoned property.
10
CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
When used in this Proxy Statement, the words or phrases believe, expects, intends,
targeted, will likely result, are expected to, will continue, anticipate, estimate,
project or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to
differ materially from results presently anticipated or projected. Katy cautions you not to place
undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Katy
advises readers that Katys actual results may differ materially from any opinions or statements
expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements in this Proxy Statement or in
our other filings with the SEC. To the extent that there is any material change in the information
discussed in this Proxy Statement, the Company will promptly disclose the change as required by
applicable SEC rules and regulations. Please see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled
Available Information.
Various future events or factors may cause our results of operations or performance to differ
materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. These factors include:
|
|
|
Increases in the cost of, or in some cases continuation of, the current price levels
of thermoplastic resins, paper board packaging, and other raw materials. |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to reduce product costs, including raw material, manufacturing,
sourcing, freight, and other product costs. |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to reduce administrative costs through consolidation of functions and
systems improvements. |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to protect our intellectual property rights adequately. |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to grow our revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to achieve product price increases, especially as they relate to
potentially higher raw material costs. |
|
|
|
|
Competition from foreign competitors. |
|
|
|
|
The potential impact of rising interest rates on our LIBOR-based Bank of America
Credit Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
Our inability to meet covenants associated with the Bank of America Credit
Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
Our failure to identify, and promptly and effectively remediate, any material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
|
The potential impact of rising costs for insurance for properties and various forms
of liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
The potential impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our
foreign operations. |
11
|
|
|
Labor issues, including union activities that require an increase in production
costs or lead to a strike, thus impairing production and decreasing sales. We are also
subject to labor relations issues at entities involved in our supply chain, including
both suppliers and those involved in transportation and shipping. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in significant laws and government regulations affecting environmental
compliance and income taxes. |
|
|
|
|
General changes in economic conditions, both nationally and in our primary market
area. |
|
|
|
|
The potential impact of uncertainties in current capital markets. |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The following questions and answers are intended to briefly address potential questions regarding
the Special Meeting and the Reverse Stock Split. These questions and answers may not address all
questions that may be important to you as a stockholder. Please refer to the more detailed
information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, the exhibits to this Proxy Statement, and
any information and documents referred to or incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the date, time and place of the Special Meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The Special Meeting will be held on , 2008 at 10:00 am local time
at the Holiday Inn Mount Kisco, located at One Holiday Inn Drive,
Mount Kisco, New York. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What will stockholders be asked to vote upon at the Special Meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
We will ask our stockholders to approve a proposal to amend Katys
Certificate to effect the Reverse Stock Split. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the proposal? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
We are proposing that our stockholders approve a reverse 1-for-500
stock split of our outstanding shares, which is accomplished through
the amendment of our Certificate. |
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of the Reverse Stock Split is to allow us to suspend our
SEC-reporting obligations (referred to as going private) by reducing
the number of our stockholders of record to fewer than 300. As a
result, we expect to terminate the registration of our common stock
under federal securities laws. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
If the Company suspends its SEC-reporting obligations, will it still
publish quarterly financial results? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Yes. We plan to publicly post our annual audited financial statements
and quarterly unaudited financial statements through the pink sheets
financial reports service. We also currently intend to continue to
solicit proxies in connection with our annual meetings, |
12
|
|
|
|
|
though we will no longer be subject to proxy rules under federal securities laws. However,
there is no requirement that we do any of the foregoing, and if provided, these documents
will not be as detailed or extensive as the information we currently file with the SEC and
deliver to stockholders. As noted elsewhere, should we choose to make any information
available from time to time, such a decision would be at our complete discretion and should
in no way be interpreted to mean that the same type of information will be supplied in the
future. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why should I vote to approve the Reverse Stock Split? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The Board of Directors believes that the monetary expense and the burden to management incident to continued compliance
with the Exchange Act significantly outweigh any benefits derived from continued registration of the shares. The Reverse
Stock Split will also serve as a source of liquidity for those stockholders who receive cash for their shares. In
addition, the Reverse Stock Split will provide Cashed Out Holders with an opportunity to liquidate their shares at a
premium to recent trading prices without paying brokerage commissions or other transaction fees. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the Reverse Stock Split? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you are the owner of fewer than 500 Katy shares on the date of the Reverse Stock Split, you will receive $2.00 in cash,
without interest, from us for each pre-split share you own. If you are the owner of more than 500 Katy shares on the date
of the Reverse Stock Split, you will receive one share for each 500 shares held before the Reverse Stock Split and, in lieu
of any fractional shares following the Reverse Stock Split, will receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for any shares
held immediately before the Reverse Stock Split that result in the fraction. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will the Reverse Stock Split affect the Companys directors, executive officers and their affiliates? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
We expect that none of our directors or their affiliates will be cashed out in the Reverse Stock Split given their level of
ownership of the Companys shares, though three will receive a nominal amount of cash for fractional shares that are cashed
out. Two of our executive officers currently hold less than 500 shares and therefore will
likely be cashed out. After the Reverse Stock Split, no executive officers will be a
shareholder of the Company; however, the executive officers will continue to hold outstanding and
unexercised stock options. The Reverse Stock Split
will have no material effect on our directors, executive officers and their affiliates except that the total ownership of
the Companys common stock owned by such affiliated stockholders will increase slightly and such stockholders may receive
cash from the Company for any fractional shares owned after the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, these stockholders will
no longer be subject to the same reporting requirements after the Company deregisters as a reporting company under the
Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will the Reverse Stock Split affect the day to day operations of the Company? |
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Though the
Reverse Stock Split will have very little effect on the Companys business and operations, it will reduce management time
spent on compliance and disclosure matters attributable to our Exchange Act filings, and may therefore enable management to
increase its focus on managing Katys business and growing shareholder value. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
How was the price of $2.00 in cash for each pre-split share determined? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
In arriving at the $2.00 in cash for each pre-split share, the Board of Directors analyzed the average closing price for
the stock over a range of time periods, in order to ensure that it captured the long-term value of the stock rather than
short term values affected by recent stock market volatility. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Cash Out Price of $2.00 per Katy share represents (i) a premium of 40.8% over the average closing price of Katy shares
over the one year prior to and including September 19, 2008, which was $1.42 per share, (ii) a premium of 53.8% over the
average closing price of Katy shares over the three months days prior to and including September 19, 2008, which was $1.30
per share, and (iii) a premium of 135.3% over the closing price of Katy shares on September 19, 2008, which was $0.85 per
share. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors engaged the valuation firm of VRC to opine on whether that price was fair to the holders of the
Companys common stock. In connection with such determination, VRC has issued a Fairness Opinion which is attached to this
Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
How will the Company pay the stockholders who will receive cash pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The Company has access to sufficient funds under its credit facility to pay for all the fractional shares cashed out in
connection with the Reverse Stock Split. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Why is 500 shares the cutoff number for determining which stockholders will be cashed out and which stockholders will
remain as stockholders of Katy? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
We estimate that a 500 share cutoff will result in approximately 107 stockholders of record, such stockholders owning
approximately 98% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company prior to the Reverse Stock Split. This reduced
number of stockholders will permit us to deregister with the SEC and will provide a cushion to help ensure that the
record number of stockholders does not increase again to over 500 in the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Is there a limit on the number of shares Katy will exchange for cash? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Katy has not set a limit on the number of shares it will exchange for cash. However, the Board of Directors may, in its
discretion, cancel the Special Meeting or abandon the Reverse Stock Split if it determines the Reverse Stock Split is not
in the best interests of Katy, including if there is a change in the number of shares that will be exchanged for |
14
|
|
|
|
|
cash that would substantially increase the cost of the Reverse Stock Split from what is
currently anticipated. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What happens if the Special Meeting is postponed or adjourned? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Your proxy will be good and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke
your proxy until it is voted. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
How will I know if Katy decides to cancel the Special Meeting? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The Board of Directors will promptly notify stockholders of the decision by mail if time permits or by announcement at the
Special Meeting. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
May I buy additional shares in order to remain a stockholder of Katy? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Yes. As long as you are able to acquire a sufficient number of shares so that you are the owner of 500 or more shares
which are held in the same name and in the same account prior to the Effective Date, your Katy shares will not be cashed
out in the Reverse Stock Split. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What happens if I buy shares after [Record Date]? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Shares bought after [ ] (the record date for voting at the Special Meeting) are not entitled to vote, and as with all
other shares, will be subject to the Reverse Stock Split on the Effective Date. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What if I hold my shares in street name? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
It is our desire to treat stockholders who hold shares of our common stock in street name through a nominee (such as a bank
or broker) in the same manner as stockholders whose shares are registered in their name. However, we or our transfer agent
will not attempt to compare your record holdings with any shares that you may hold in street name in a brokerage account
and these banks, brokers and other nominees may have different procedures for processing the Reverse Stock Split.
Accordingly, if you hold your shares of our common stock in street name, we encourage you to contact your bank, broker or
other nominee. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the recommendation of our Board of Directors regarding the proposal? |
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Our Board of Directors has determined that the Reverse Stock Split is advisable and in the best interests of Katys
stockholders. Our Board of Directors has approved the Reverse Stock Split and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR
the amendment to the Certificate so the Reverse Stock Split may be effected. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
When is the Reverse Stock Split
expected to be completed? |
15
|
|
|
A: |
|
Our Special Meeting will be held on , 2008. We need to file the necessary amendment with the Delaware Secretary of
State for the Reverse Stock Split to become effective. If the proposed amendment to our Certificate is approved at the
Special Meeting, we expect the Reverse Stock Split to be completed as soon as practicable thereafter, likely within
twenty-four hours. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What if the proposed Reverse Stock Split is not completed? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If the Reverse Stock Split is not completed, we will continue our current operations, and we will continue to be subject to
the reporting requirements of the SEC. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Holders of record of Katy shares on the Record Date, [ ], are entitled to vote at the Special Meeting. Each of
our stockholders is entitled to one vote for each common share owned on the Record Date. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What vote is required for our stockholders to approve the Reverse Stock Split? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Special Meeting must vote FOR the Reverse
Stock Split. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What happens if I do not return my proxy card? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Unless you vote in person, a failure to return your proxy card will have the same effect as voting against the Reverse
Stock Split. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Can I change my vote after I have mailed my proxy card? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may revoke your proxy by either (i) submitting a new proxy with a later date or a written revocation so long as
the new proxy or written revocation is received by the Company before the proxy is exercised, or (ii) attending the Special
Meeting and voting in person or giving notice of revocation in open meeting before the proxy is exercised. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
After reading and considering the information contained in this Proxy Statement, please vote your Katy shares as soon as
possible. You may vote your shares by returning the enclosed proxy or by voting in person at the Special Meeting. If your
shares are held by a broker, your broker will vote your shares only if you provide instructions to your broker on how to
vote. You should instruct your broker on how to vote your shares using the voting instruction card provided by your
broker. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Will I have appraisal or dissenters rights in connection with the Reverse Stock Split? |
16
|
|
|
A: |
|
No. Under Delaware Law, you do not have appraisal or any other dissenters rights whether or not you vote for the Reverse
Stock Split. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Should I send in my share certificates now? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
No. If the Reverse Stock Split is approved, our transfer agent will send you written instructions in a letter of
transmittal for exchanging your share certificates. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
If the Reverse Stock Split is completed and I am still a shareholder, will I be able to buy or sell shares in a public
market? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
After completing the Reverse Stock Split, the liquidity of the shares in public markets may be reduced. It is the
intention of the Board of Directors that the Companys shares be quoted in the
pink sheets-limited information tier
following the Reverse Stock Split. This tier covers issuers that have provided limited information with respect to the
preceding six months, including quarterly financial reports that include, at a minimum, balance sheet, income statement and
total shares outstanding for a period within the preceding six months. If, however, a qualified broker-dealer is not
willing to quote the Katy shares, stockholders will be unable to use the pink sheets to trade Katy shares. |
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you have questions about the Reverse Stock Split, you should contact
Philip Reinkemeyer at (314) 656-4362, or contact the
Companys proxy solicitor, Morrow & Co., LLC, toll-free within the United States at 1-800-607-0088. |
PROPOSAL IREVERSE STOCK SPLIT
At the Special Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Katys
Certificate of Incorporation to (i) change the number of authorized shares of Katy common stock by
dividing the total authorized shares by 500, (ii) change the par value of Katy common stock by
multiplying the current par value by 500, and (iii) change the number of issued and outstanding
common shares of Katy by dividing the total issued and outstanding common shares by 500 and paying
cash in lieu of any resulting fractional shares. As a result of this Reverse Stock Split, (a) each
stockholder owning fewer than 500 shares of Katy immediately before the Reverse Stock Split will
receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for each Katy common share owned by such stockholder
immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split and will no longer be a stockholder of Katy; and (b)
each stockholder holding 500 or more Katy shares immediately before the effective time of the
Reverse Stock Split will receive one share for each 500 shares held before the Reverse Stock Split
and, in lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse Stock Split, will receive $2.00 in
cash, without interest, for any shares held immediately before the Reverse Stock Split that result
in the fraction. The proposed amendment to Katys Certificate is attached as Exhibit B to this
Proxy Statement.
If effected, the Reverse Stock Split will enable Katy to terminate its status as a public
reporting company with the SEC. It is anticipated that Katy shares will be quoted in the pink
17
sheets following the Reverse Stock Split. The pink sheets is a centralized quotation service that
collects and publishes market maker quotes for securities. The pink sheets categorizes all
securities trading over-the-counter into easily identifiable tiers the Company intends for the
Katy shares to be quoted in the pink sheets-limited information tier. This tier covers issuers that
have provided limited information with respect to the preceding six months, including quarterly
financial reports that include, at a minimum, balance sheet, income statement and total shares
outstanding for a period within the preceding six months.
Although we anticipate that a broker-dealer will quote our shares on the pink sheets, there
can be no assurance that any broker-dealer will be willing to continue to act as a market maker in
our shares after the Reverse Stock Split. If a qualified broker-dealer is not willing to quote the
Katy shares, stockholders will be unable to use the pink sheets to trade Katy shares.
The Board of Directors has determined that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of
the Company and its stockholders and is fair to Katys affiliated and unaffiliated stockholders,
including Cashed Out Holders and Continuing Holders. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends
that the stockholders vote FOR the approval of the Reverse Stock Split.
SPECIAL FACTORS
Purpose of and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split
The purpose of the Reverse Stock Split is to reduce the number of record holders of Katy
shares below 300 and enable us to terminate Katys status as a public reporting company with the
SEC and thereby reduce the financial and managerial costs incurred by the Company with respect to
such status. The Board of Directors believes that the monetary expense and the burden to
management incident to continued compliance with the Exchange Act imposed by the requirements found
in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act significantly outweigh any benefits derived from continued registration
of the Companys shares.
In determining whether the number of our stockholders of record falls below 300 as a result of
the Reverse Stock Split, we must count stockholders of record in accordance with Rule 12g5-1 under
the Exchange Act. Rule 12g5-1 provides, with certain exceptions, that in determining whether
issuers, including the Company, are subject to the registration provisions of the Exchange Act,
securities are considered to be held of record by each person who is identified as the owner of
such securities on the respective records of security holders maintained by or on behalf of the
issuers. However, institutional custodians such as Cede & Co. and other commercial depositories are
not considered a single holder of record for purposes of these provisions. Rather, each
depositorys accounts are treated as the record holder of shares.
As a result of the Reverse Stock Split and the repurchase of the resulting fractional shares
from holders of fewer than 500 shares, we expect to have approximately 107 record holders of Katy
shares, which would enable us to terminate the registration of our shares under the Exchange Act.
If the Reverse Stock Split is completed, we intend to file with the SEC a Form 15 to deregister the
Katy shares. Upon the filing of the Form 15, our obligation to file periodic and current reports
under the Exchange Act will be immediately suspended. Deregistration of our
18
shares will be
effective 90 days after filing of the Form 15. Upon deregistration of our shares, our obligation to
comply with the requirements of the proxy rules and to file proxy statements under Section 14 of
the Exchange Act will also be terminated. We will not be required to file periodic and current
reports with the SEC in the future unless we subsequently file another registration statement under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or again have record holders of common shares in excess of
500.
It is anticipated that, after the Reverse Stock Split, Katy shares will be quoted in the pink
sheets in the limited information tier.
Reduced Costs and Expenses. We incur both direct and indirect costs to comply with
the filing and reporting requirements imposed on us as a public reporting company. As described
below, these costs include, among other things, managements time spent preparing and reviewing our
public filings and legal and accounting fees associated with the preparation and review of such
filings. For smaller publicly traded companies, such as Katy, these costs represent a larger
portion of our revenues than for larger public companies.
Over the years, we have incurred increasing costs as a result of being a public company.
Since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002, in particular, our public company expenses
have increased significantly and will continue to do so if we remain subject to such requirements.
When the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was adopted, we realized that we would incur additional expenses as a
result. We did not choose to deregister in 2002, however, because much of the Act had yet to be
implemented and the extent of the increased costs was then unknown. Currently, the Act requires
public companies to include a report by management on the companys internal control over financial
reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires a public companys auditor to complete an
attestation report regarding the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial
reporting, currently deferred until our fiscal 2009 year.
Not all of our reporting costs will be eliminated by deregistration, however. We plan to
publicly post our annual audited financial statements and quarterly unaudited financial statements
through the pink sheets financial reports service. We are only required to do so to the extent our
shares trade on the pink-sheets-limited information tier, and so we may in the future decide not to
do so. We also plan to continue to solicit proxies from our stockholders in connection with our
annual meeting. If provided, these documents will not be as detailed or as extensive as those
required of a public reporting company.
The Board of Directors believes that by deregistering our shares and suspending Katys
periodic reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, we will realize recurring annual cost
savings of approximately $800,000 in fees and expenses that we have historically incurred and
additional expenses we expect to incur, including fees and expenses for compliance with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and associated regulations. These estimated cost savings are described in
greater detail below.
19
Estimated Cost Savings:
|
|
|
|
|
Current annual costs: |
|
|
|
|
Legal fees |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Audit and related fees |
|
|
25,000 |
|
Shareholder-related expense |
|
|
75,000 |
|
Director and officer liability insurance |
|
|
130,000 |
|
Corporate personnel costs |
|
|
350,000 |
|
Franchise Tax |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current annual costs |
|
$ |
705,000 |
|
Additional Section 404 audit fees: |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated future annual cost savings |
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
These estimated annual cost savings reflect, among other things: (i) a reduction in audit and
related fees; (ii) a reduction in legal fees related to securities law compliance; (iii) the
elimination of filing costs and expenses associated with electronically filing periodic reports and
other documents (such as proxy statements) with the SEC on its EDGAR database; (iv) the lower
printing and mailing costs attributable to the reduction in the number of stockholders and the
reduced disclosure requirements; (v) the reduction in management time spent on compliance and
disclosure matters attributable to our Exchange Act filings; (vi) the lower risk of liability that
is associated with non-reporting company status and the expected decrease in premiums for
directors and officers liability insurance; (vii) the audit savings and internal personnel
savings due to Katy not being subject to the public company provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
(viii) the savings in fees charged by BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, Katys transfer agent (the
Transfer Agent), that are expected because of the reduction in the number of stockholder accounts
to be handled by the Transfer Agent; and (ix) a reduction in direct miscellaneous clerical and
other expenses.
The annual cost savings set forth above is only an estimate. The actual savings we realize
from going private may be higher or lower than this estimate. The estimate is based upon the (i)
actual costs to us of the services and disbursements in each of the categories listed above that
were reflected in our recent financial statements, and (ii) allocation to each category of
managements estimates of the portion of the expenses and disbursements believed to be solely or
primarily attributable to our public reporting company status. In some instances, these cost
savings expectations were based on verifiable assumptions. For example, our auditing fees will be
reduced if we cease to be a public reporting company due to the elimination of fees for interim
review services and annual 10-K filings. In addition, the costs associated with retaining legal
counsel to assist us in complying with the Exchange Act reporting requirements will be eliminated
if we no longer file reports with the SEC.
Operational Flexibility. Another reason for the Reverse Stock Split is the
operational flexibility that deregistration would provide. The Board of Directors believes that
ceasing to be a public reporting company would enable management to focus more on Katys long-term
growth without the burden of SEC reporting requirements and other aspects of being a public
company.
Effects of the Reverse Stock Split
The primary effect of the Reverse Stock Split will be to reduce the number of record holders
of Katy shares and to deregister our shares with the SEC under the Exchange Act.
20
Subject to the approval of the Reverse Stock Split, immediately after giving effect to such
Reverse Stock Split, our authorized capital will be 1,270,000 shares of all classes of stock,
divided into two classes, one class consisting of 70,000 shares of common stock, $500.00 par value,
and the other class consisting of 1,200,000 shares of preferred stock, $100.00 par value.
Discussed below are some additional effects of the Reverse Stock Split on certain persons or
groups.
Effects on Cashed Out Holders. Upon completion of the Reverse Stock Split, Cashed Out
Holders (i.e., holders of less than 500 Katy shares immediately before the completion of the
Reverse Stock Split):
|
|
|
Will have their Katy shares cancelled in exchange for the Cash Out Price instead of
selling their shares at a time and for a price of their choosing; |
|
|
|
|
Instead of receiving a fractional share, will receive cash, in a taxable
transaction, equal to $2.00 for each Katy share held immediately before the Reverse
Stock Split; |
|
|
|
|
Will not pay brokerage commissions or other transaction fees; and |
|
|
|
|
Will no longer be a stockholder of Katy and will not have the opportunity to
participate in the potential appreciation in the value of Katy shares unless they buy
additional shares on the open market. |
Cashed Out Holders do not have appraisal or dissenters rights under Delaware Law or under the
Companys Certificate.
For a discussion of the federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split, please see
the section of this Proxy Statement entitled Reverse Stock Split Proposal Material United States
Federal Income Tax Consequences.
Katy intends to treat stockholders holding its common stock in street name in the same manner
as record holders. Prior to the Effective Date, Katy will conduct an inquiry of all brokers, banks
and other nominees that hold shares of Katy common stock in street name, ask them to provide
information on how many shares held by beneficial holders will be cashed out, and request that they
effect the Reverse Stock Split for those beneficial holders. However, these banks, brokers and
other nominees may have different procedures than registered stockholders for processing the
Reverse Stock Split. As a result, a stockholder holding a total of 500 or more shares of common
stock may nevertheless have those shares cashed out if the stockholder holds a combination of
street name shares and shares of record, or holds shares in multiple brokerage firms. If you are in
this situation and desire to remain a stockholder of the Company after the Reverse Stock Split, you
should consolidate your holdings into one brokerage account or record holder position prior to the
Effective Date.
If you are a Cashed Out Holder, you will receive a letter of transmittal from us as soon as
practicable after the Reverse Stock Split is completed. The letter of transmittal will contain
instructions on how to surrender your existing share certificate(s) to the Transfer Agent for your
cash payment. You will not receive your cash payment until you surrender your outstanding share
certificate(s) to the Transfer Agent, along with a completed and executed copy of the letter of
transmittal. DO NOT SEND YOUR SHARE CERTIFICATE(S) IN WITH YOUR PROXY.
21
PLEASE WAIT UNTIL YOU
RECEIVE YOUR LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO SURRENDER YOUR SHARE CERTIFICATE (S) TO THE TRANSFER AGENT.
Effects on Continuing Holders. If the Reverse Stock Split is completed, Continuing
Holders (i.e., holders of 500 or more Katy shares immediately before the Reverse Stock Split):
|
|
|
Will hold one share for each 500 shares held immediately before the Reverse Stock
Split; |
|
|
|
|
Will receive, in lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse Stock Split,
$2.00 in cash, without interest, for any shares held immediately before the Reverse
Stock Split that result in the fraction; |
|
|
|
|
Will likely experience a further reduction in liquidity of Katy shares and a
possible decline in the price at which they may sell Katy shares; |
|
|
|
|
Will experience a nominal increase in their respective ownership percentages of Katy
shares; and |
|
|
|
|
Will have less access to information about Katys operations and financial results
than is currently available to the general public, although the Company plans to
continue to provide certain financial information to stockholders. |
The Company may or may not provide investors with information they request that we are not
required by law to provide. The Reverse Stock Split will not affect the right of the Continuing
Holders under Delaware Law to obtain certain information from Katy. Under Delaware Law, there is a
right to make a written request to inspect certain books and records for any purpose reasonably
related to the persons interest as a stockholder.
Katy shares are currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. The Company intends to have the
Katy shares quoted in the pink sheets in the limited information tier following the Reverse Stock
Split. This tier covers issuers that have provided limited information with respect to the
preceding six months, including quarterly financial reports that include, at a minimum, balance
sheet, income statement and total shares outstanding for a period within the preceding six months.
Although the Company anticipates that a broker-dealer will quote its shares on the pink sheets,
there can be no assurance that any broker-dealer will be willing to continue to act as a market
maker in Katy shares after the Reverse Stock Split.
Effects on Katy Share Certificates. In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, our
common shares will be identified by a new CUSIP number. This new CUSIP number will appear on all
share certificates issued after the Effective Date. All share certificates evidencing ownership of
Katy shares outstanding prior to the Reverse Stock Split will, after the Effective Date, be deemed
to represent (a) for Cashed Out Holders, the right to receive $2.00 for each Katy share being
repurchased, and (b) for Continuing Holders, the right to receive (i) a new share certificate with
the new CUSIP number representing one share for each 500 shares held prior to the Reverse Stock
Split, and (ii) in lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse
Stock Split, $2.00 in cash, without interest, for each share held immediately before the Reverse
Stock Split that results in the fraction. Do not send your share
22
certificates to the Transfer
Agent until you have received a letter of transmittal and have followed the instructions in that
letter.
Effects on Katy. Although we will no longer be a public reporting company and will
therefore no longer be subject to the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or the liability
provisions of the Exchange Act, we expect our business and operations to continue as they are
presently conducted. The executive officers and directors of Katy will not change due to the
Reverse Stock Split. Katy expects to realize time and cost savings as a result of terminating its
public company status, and intends to invest those savings in other areas of its business
operations. Other than as described in this Proxy Statement, neither Katy nor its management has
any current plans or proposals to do any of the following: effect any extraordinary corporate
transaction (such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation); sell or transfer any material amount
of Katys assets; change the composition of the Board of Directors or management of Katy; change
materially Katys indebtedness or capitalization; or otherwise effect any material change in Katys
corporate structure or business.
Effects on Rights of Katy Shares. There will be no changes with respect to voting,
liquidation or other rights associated with the Katy shares.
Effects on Katys Executive Officers, Directors and Affiliates. Pursuant to Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act, directors, officers, and 10% stockholders of companies who have shares
registered under the Exchange Act are required to report changes in their respective beneficial
ownership of such shares to the SEC. Such insiders are required to file an initial Form 3 showing
their respective beneficial holdings within 10 days after becoming subject to Section 16(a).
Thereafter, a reporting insider is generally required to file a report on Form 4 within two
business days following most acquisitions and dispositions by the insider of company shares. As a
related deterrent to improper trading on inside information, insiders are also subject to the
so-called short-swing profit disgorgement requirements of the Exchange Act. In general, these
requirements mandate the disgorgement by an insider of any paper profit realized on a purchase and
a sale of company stock which each occur within a six-month period. Transactions are generally
paired so as to match the lowest purchase price and the highest sale price within the six-month
period, thus extracting the maximum profit from the insider on the transaction or transactions.
If the company declines to press a claim for disgorgement, a claim for recovery of profit may be
asserted by any stockholder on behalf of the company. In addition to the effects of the Reverse
Stock Split on stockholders generally, if we complete the Reverse Stock Split and deregister, the
Companys insiders will no longer be required to comply with these requirements. The deregistration
would also limit the ability of our affiliates to dispose of their Katy shares pursuant to Rule 144
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
Additionally, once the Form 15 is filed with the SEC and the Companys shares are
deregistered, the Company will no longer be subject to the periodic reporting requirements or the
proxy rules under the Exchange Act. As such, information about our directors and officers
compensation and share ownership will no longer be publicly available.
As is more thoroughly discussed under the heading Reverse Stock Split Proposal Description
and Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon, we expect that upon the completion of
the Reverse Stock Split, our executive officers and directors will own
23
approximately 40.3% of the
then outstanding Katy shares, as compared to approximately 39.1% of the common shares outstanding
immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
Alternatives to the Reverse Stock Split
In making its determination to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors
considered the feasibility of the alternative transactions described below. The Board of Directors
did not investigate the potential costs of the transactions listed below because it determined that
they either had little likelihood of sufficiently reducing the number of Katys stockholders or had
other features, such as triggering dissenters rights, which could possibly add to the expense and
the uncertainty of the transaction.
Issuer Tender Offer. The Board of Directors considered the feasibility of an issuer
tender offer to repurchase Katy shares. The primary disadvantage of this type of transaction is
that, due to its voluntary nature, we would have no assurance that enough Katy shares would be
tendered to sufficiently reduce the number of Katys stockholders. In addition, the rules governing
tender offers require equal treatment of all stockholders, including pro rata acceptance of offers
from stockholders. These requirements make it difficult to ensure that we would be able to reduce
the number of record holders of Katy shares enough (i.e., below the 300 stockholder level) to
permit us to deregister the Katy shares, potentially resulting in our incurring the expense of
repurchasing numerous shares and still being unable to deregister. In addition, a tender offer
would require significantly more cash than a Reverse Stock Split. As a result of these
disadvantages, the Board of Directors determined not to pursue this alternative.
Reorganization Through A Cash Out Merger. The alternative available to the Board of
Directors which was most similar to the Reverse Stock Split was coordinating a cash out merger. In
order to effect the cash out merger, the Companys insiders (management and large shareholders)
would contribute their shares in the Company to form an acquisition entity which would merge into
the Company. As a result of the merger, the shares of the Companys common stock (other than shares
owned by the Companys insiders) would be converted into the right to receive cash. The Board of
Directors concluded that the Reverse Stock Split was a better alternative since it (i) requires
significantly less cash, (ii) allows unaffiliated holders of more than 500 shares the opportunity
to remain stockholders in the Company, (iii) does not require the formation of a new entity, (iv)
allows Katy to avoid the regulatory issues and approvals associated with the merger of Katy into
another corporation, and (v) does not trigger dissenters rights as a cash out merger would.
Maintaining the Status Quo. The Board of Directors considered maintaining the status
quo. In that case, we would continue to incur the expenses of being a public reporting company
without enjoying the benefits traditionally associated with public company status. In addition,
significant time would continue to be spent by management on compliance and disclosure issues
relating to our filings under the Exchange Act, which dilutes managements focus on managing Katys
business and growing shareholder value. The Board of Directors believes that maintaining the
status quo is not in the best interests of Katy and its stockholders and rejected this alternative.
24
Fairness of the Reverse Stock Split
The Board of Directors believes that the Reverse Stock Split is fair to affiliated and
unaffiliated stockholders, including Cashed Out Holders and Continuing Holders. After consideration
of all aspects of the Reverse Stock Split, as described below, the Board of Directors unanimously
approved the Reverse Stock Split. Except for such approval, we are not aware that any of Katys
executive officers, directors or affiliates has made a recommendation either in support of or
opposed to the Reverse Stock Split.
Affiliated and unaffiliated stockholders will be treated the same in the Reverse Stock Split.
The only factor affecting whether a stockholder will be cashed out or will remain a stockholder of
Katy is the number of shares held by the stockholder. As a result, the Reverse Stock Split is not
structured so that approval of a majority of unaffiliated stockholders is required. In determining
not to seek such approval, the Board of Directors was aware that Katys executive officers and
directors, who together own approximately 39.1% of the Katy shares outstanding and entitled to vote
at the Special Meeting, have indicated that they will vote all shares for which they have or share
the power to vote in favor of the Reverse Stock Split.
Although all of Katys nine directors own Katy common or preferred shares or options to
purchase Katy shares personally or represent entities that own shares or options, the 500 share
threshold was determined without regard to their share ownership. As the directors will be treated
identically to all other stockholders in the Reverse Stock Split and only 3% of the outstanding
Katy shares will be cashed out, the Board of Directors did not feel that the additional protections
that may be afforded by an independent committee would be significant. Accordingly, no independent
committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split.
Additionally, the Board of Directors chose to not retain an unaffiliated representative to act
solely on behalf of the stockholders for the purpose of negotiating the terms of the Reverse Stock
Split or preparing a report covering the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split nor has the Board of
Directors chosen to provide unaffiliated stockholders with independent counsel with respect to the
fairness of the Reverse Stock Split. We have not made any provision in connection with the Reverse
Stock Split to grant unaffiliated stockholders access to our corporate files or to obtain counsel
or appraisal services at our expense. The Board of Directors views (i) the Fairness Opinion, (ii)
the need to obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding
Katy Shares, and (iii) the other matters discussed in this Proxy Statement as affording adequate
procedural safeguards to unaffiliated stockholders without the additional expense of multiple
financial or legal advisors. With respect to unaffiliated stockholders access to our corporate
files, the Board of Directors determined that this Proxy Statement, together with our other filings
with the SEC, provide adequate information for unaffiliated stockholders to make an informed
decision with respect to the Reverse Stock Split. The Board of Directors also considered the fact
that under Delaware Law, subject to certain conditions, stockholders have the right to review our
relevant books and records.
In analyzing the entirety of the Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors determined that
$2.00 per share represented fair consideration to the unaffiliated Cashed Out Holders. The Board of
Directors also determined that $2.00, although fair to unaffiliated Cashed Out Holders,
25
was not so
high as to be unfair to the unaffiliated Continuing Holders. In reaching this determination, the
Board of Directors concluded that any of the premiums quantified below in Market Prices and
Liquidity are justified because Cashed Out Holders will forfeit their right to sell their shares
at a time and for a price of their choosing, and not be given the opportunity to benefit from the
projected cost savings anticipated as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. At the same time, the
Board of Directors determined that no premium indicated above is so high as to be unfair to the
unaffiliated Continuing Holders, who will have the opportunity to benefit from the anticipated cost
savings related to going private. Finally, the Reverse Stock Split also provides unaffiliated
Cashed Out Holders with an opportunity to liquidate their shares without paying brokerage
commissions or other transaction fees. Consequently, based on the valuation and historical prices
described below, the Board of Directors concluded that a Cash Out Price of $2.00 per share would be
fair to unaffiliated Cashed Out Holders and unaffiliated Continuing Holders.
Other than the deliberations of the Board of Directors, no negotiations regarding the
Reverse Stock Split occurred, and the Board of Directors decided the method to be used and the
split ratio based solely on what it believed would be the most effective and efficient way to
reduce the number of stockholders below 300.
In
determining the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors considered the
factors discussed below. The Board of Directors believes that the Reverse Stock Split is
substantively fair to Katys stockholders in light of these factors.
The Board of Directors did not assign specific weight to the
following factors in a formulaic fashion, but did place emphasis on the significant cost and time
savings Katy is expected to realize from deregistration of its shares and the opportunity for
unaffiliated holders of Katy Shares to sell their shares at a premium, without brokerage fees or
commissions.
Significant Cost and Time Savings. By deregistering the Katy shares and suspending
our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, we expect to realize recurring annual cost
savings of approximately $800,000, which includes savings from the personnel expense relating to
time spent by our management to prepare and review our reports required to be filed with the SEC
under the Exchange Act. Please see the section entitled Special Factors Purpose of and Reasons
for the Reverse Stock Split for more information about these cost savings.
Market Prices and Liquidity. The Cash Out Price of $2.00 per Katy share represents
(i) a premium of 40.9% over the average closing price of Katy shares over the 12-month period prior
to and including September 19, 2008, which was $1.42 per share, (ii) a premium of 57.4% over the
average closing price of Katy shares over the 3-month period prior to and including September 19,
2008, which was $1.27 per share, and (iii) a premium of 135.3% over the closing price of Katy
shares on September 19, 2008, which was $0.85 per share.
The Board of Directors determined that $2.00 per share be established as the Cash Out Price
and engaged VRC to opine on whether that price was fair to the common stockholders of the Company.
The Board of Directors took into consideration that, historically, the market for Katy shares has
not been very liquid. Over the past few months, the liquidity of Katy shares has decreased, as
evidenced by an average trading volume in the one month prior to September 19,
26
2008 of only 2,896
shares per day, down from 7,390 shares per day over the one year prior to September 19, 2008.
Net Book Value. Net book value is based upon the historical cost of a companys
assets and ignores the value of a company as a going concern. As set forth in the section of this
Proxy Statement entitled Financial Information Summary Historical Financial Information, our
book value per outstanding common share as of June 30, 2008 was $3.57. If all outstanding
convertible preferred stock was converted into common stock as of June 30, 2008, our net book value
per common share would have been $1.06.
Liquidation Value. In determining the fairness of the Cash Out Price, the Board of
Directors did not view Katys liquidation value as representative of the value of our common
shares. Upon a liquidation of the Company, the holders of Katys preferred stock are entitled to
receive an amount in cash equal to the par value per share. As a result and based on the estimated
Enterprise Value of the Company, the Board of Directors believes there would be no positive
liquidation value for the common stockholders.
Going Concern Value. The Board of Directors also reviewed and considered the
valuation of our shares as a going concern. As part of its review, the Board of Directors
considered VRCs analysis regarding our peer groups and the comparison of our key pricing ratios
compared to those of our peer groups. This analysis is discussed later in this Proxy Statement
under the heading Opinion of VRC Public Comparables Analysis. Based on that analysis and our
ongoing operations, the Board of Directors determined that our trading price generally reflected
the value of Katy shares on a going concern basis.
Equal Treatment of Affiliated and Unaffiliated Holders of Katy Shares. The Reverse
Stock Split will not affect holders of Katy shares differently on the basis of affiliate status.
The sole determining factor in whether a stockholder will be a Cashed Out Holder or Continuing
Holder as a result of the Reverse Stock Split is the number of Katy shares held by the stockholder
immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split. Please see the section entitled Reverse Stock Split
Proposal Summary and Structure for more information.
Potential Ability to Control Decision to Remain a Holder of or Liquidate the Companys
Shares. Current holders of fewer than 500 shares can remain stockholders of the Company by
acquiring additional shares so that they own at least 500 shares immediately before the Reverse
Stock Split. Conversely, stockholders that own 500 or more shares and desire to liquidate their
shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split (at the price offered by the Company) can reduce
their holdings to less than 500 shares by selling shares prior to the Reverse Stock Split. The
Board of Directors did not place undue influence on this factor, however, because of the limited
trading market for the Companys shares on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Minimum Effect on Voting Power. The Reverse Stock Split will have minimum effect on
the voting power of Katys stockholders. The Katy shares are the only voting shares of Katy and
will continue to be the only voting shares after the Reverse Stock Split. The voting and other
27
rights of Katy shares will not be affected by the Reverse Stock Split. The only effect of the
Reverse Stock Split on Katys voting power will be a small change in the overall ownership
percentage of the Continuing Holders.
The Company currently has 7,951,176 common shares issued and outstanding. Of this amount, the
Company expects to repurchase an estimated 241,000 common shares in connection with the Reverse
Stock Split, which represents approximately 3% of the Companys current number of outstanding
shares. As a result, the ownership percentage of each common share held by a Continuing Holder will
increase nominally, and the ownership percentage of a particular Continuing Holder will increase
depending on the respective number of shares held thereby.
No Material Change in Ownership Percentage of Executive Officers and Directors. Since
only an estimated 3% out of 7,951,176 outstanding Katy shares will be eliminated as a result of
the Reverse Stock Split, the percentage ownership of the Continuing Holders will be approximately
the same as it was prior to the Reverse Stock Split. For example, the executive officers and
directors of Katy currently own approximately 39.1% of the outstanding Katy shares, and will own
approximately 40.3% of the outstanding Katy shares following the Reverse Stock Split. Please see
the section entitled Reverse Stock Split Proposal Description and Interest of Certain Persons in
Matters to be Acted Upon.
Reduced Expenses from Administering Small Accounts. The Reverse Stock Split will
reduce expenses related to administering small stockholder accounts. As of the Record Date, we
estimate that we had approximately 519 record stockholders that held fewer than 500 shares. These
stockholders hold approximately 132,839, or 1.7%, of our outstanding shares but represent
approximately 82.9% of our total number of record holders.
Other Factors. Although potentially relevant to a determination of fairness of the
Reverse Stock Split, the factors listed below are, for the reasons given, not applicable to Katy,
and were not considered by the Board of Directors for this reason.
|
|
|
Firm Offers. No firm offers to purchase Katy have been made during the past
two calendar years or during the current calendar year. We have not received any firm
offers to purchase Katy and the Board of Directors did not seek out any such offers.
The Board of Directors believes that a sale of Katy is not in our best interests or the
best interests of our stockholders, customers, employees or community at this time. |
|
|
|
|
Merger, Consolidation or Other Extraordinary Transaction. With the
exception of the sale of the Woods division in 2007, we have not engaged in a merger or
consolidation with another company or in any other extraordinary transaction, such as
the sale or other transfer of all, or a substantial part, of our assets, during the
past two calendar years or during the current calendar year. |
|
|
|
|
Securities Purchases. There have not been any purchases of our shares
during the past two calendar years that would enable the holder to exercise control of
Katy. |
In summary, the Board of Directors determined that the steps not taken as discussed above
would be costly and would not provide any meaningful additional benefits, and were not necessary to
ensure the fairness of the Reverse Stock Split. The Board of Directors noted that the
28
financial
advisor engaged by Katy considered and rendered its opinion as to the fairness of the Cash Out
Price, from a financial point of view, to Katys common stockholders.
Financing, Source of Funds and Expenses
It is expected that the entire $482,000 estimated to be necessary to pay the Cash Out Price to
the Cashed Out Holders and Continuing Holders will come from the Companys credit facility, which
is described below. In addition to the Cash Out Price described above, the Company will also pay
all of the expenses related to the Reverse Stock Split. See Meeting And Voting Information
Solicitation and Costs for the Companys estimates of the costs related to the Reverse Stock
Split.
The Company entered into a $50.6 million credit facility with Bank of America on November 30,
2007 (the Credit Agreement), which consists of a $10.6 million term loan (Term Loan) and a
$40.0 million revolving loan (Revolving Credit Facility), including a $10.0 million sub-limit for
letters of credit. The Companys Term Loan balance immediately prior to the Credit Agreement was
$10.0 million. The annual amortization on the new Term Loan, paid quarterly, is $1.5 million with
final payment due November 30, 2010. The Term Loan is collateralized by the Companys property,
plant and equipment.
All extensions of credit under the Credit Agreement are collateralized by a first priority
security interest in and lien upon the capital stock of each material domestic subsidiary of the
Company (65% of the capital stock of certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company), and all present
and future assets and properties of the Company.
The Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain a minimum level of availability such
that its eligible collateral must exceed the sum of its outstanding borrowings under the Revolving
Credit Facility and letters of credit by at least $5.0 million. Borrowings under the Credit
Agreement bear interest, at the Companys option, at either a rate equal to the banks base rate or
LIBOR plus a margin based on levels of borrowing availability. Interest rate margins for the
Revolving Credit Facility under the applicable LIBOR option range from 2.00% to 2.50% on borrowing
availability levels of $20.0 million to less than $10.0 million, respectively. For the Term Loan,
interest rate margins under the applicable LIBOR option will range from 2.25% to 2.75%. As of June
30, 2008, our Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan were bearing interest at stated interest
rates of 5.0% and 5.25%, respectively.
Conclusion
The Board of Directors believes that all of the factors mentioned above, both favorable and
unfavorable, when viewed together support a conclusion that the Reverse Stock Split is fair to all
Katy stockholders, including the Cashed Out Holders and Continuing Holders.
29
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT PROPOSAL
Background of Katy
Katy was organized as a Delaware corporation in 1967, and went public in 1967. Our principal
business is the manufacturing and distribution of commercial cleaning products. We also manufacture
and distribute storage products. The Companys business units operate within a framework of
policies and goals aligned under a corporate group. Katys corporate group is responsible for
overall planning, financial management, acquisitions, dispositions, and other related
administrative matters.
Katys principal offices are located at 305 Rock Industrial Park Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri
63044, and its telephone number at that location is (314) 656-4321.
Description of Capital Stock
The Company has two classes of issued and outstanding equity securities. The Company is
authorized to issue 36,200,000 shares, divided into two classes, one class consisting of 1,200,000
shares of preferred stock, $100.00 par value, and the other class consisting of 35,000,000 shares
of common stock, $1.00 par value. As of September 19, 2008, the Company had approximately
7,951,176 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding, held by approximately 626 stockholders
of record. As of September 19, 2008, the Company had approximately 1,131,551 shares of its
preferred stock issued and outstanding, held by one stockholder.
Each share of common stock has equal voting rights, preferences and privileges. Holders of the
stock have one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a shareholder vote.
The preferred stock is non-voting but must approve certain transactions, including a merger or sale
of the Company or any transaction that would impair the rights of the preferred stock as a class.
The preferred stock is convertible at the option of the holder at any time after the earlier
of 1) June 28, 2006, 2) board approval of a merger, consolidation or other business combination
involving a change in control of the Company, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets
or liquidation of the Company, or 3) a contested election for directors of the Company nominated by
KKTY Holding Company, LLC. If converted, the shares would represent approximately 70% of the
common shares of Katy. The preferred shares 1) are non-redeemable, except in whole, but not in
part, at the Companys option (as approved only by the Companys Class I directors) at any time
after June 30, 2021, 2) were entitled to receive cumulative PIK dividends through December 31,
2004, at a rate of 15% percent, 3) have no preemptive rights with respect to any other securities
or instruments issued by the Company, and 4) have registration rights with respect to any common
shares issued upon conversion of the preferred stock. Upon liquidation of Katy, the holders of the
preferred stock would receive the greater of (i) an amount equal to the par value ($100 per share)
of their preferred stock, or (ii) an amount that the holders of the preferred stock would have
received if their shares of preferred stock were converted into common stock immediately prior to
the distribution upon liquidation. Under our Certificate, a
30
merger between Katy and another entity
or a sale of all or substantially all of Katys assets will not be treated as a liquidation.
If the Reverse Stock Split is approved, the conversion rate of the preferred stock will be
automatically adjusted in accordance with the terms of our Certificate. The conversion factor,
which is currently six, will be multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the
number of shares of common stock outstanding before the Reverse Stock Split and the denominator of
which shall be the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after the Reverse Stock
Split.
Background of the Reverse Stock Split
The Company first issued publicly traded stock in 1967 and was listed on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) until 2007. In 2002, Congresss passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
ushered in a wave of corporate reforms that have increased Katys expense as a public company
without enhancing, from an operations perspective in the Board of Directors view, the benefits of
being a public company. The Company has estimated that the annual cost of operating as a public
company and complying with SOX and associated regulations is approximately $800,000.
In the ordinary course of business, management has from time to time updated the Board of
Directors on the current and anticipated costs relating to public company status, SEC reporting and
SOX compliance. This issue was first raised at the Board of Directors meeting of May 30, 2002. At
the Board of Directors meeting of August 22, 2002, management presented to the Board of Directors a
summary of the disclosure requirements under both proposed and enacted SOX regulations. On
February 3, 2003, the Board of Directors, upon being briefed on various SOX and corporate
governance developments, acted to strengthen corporate governance procedures. On a unanimous vote,
the Board of Directors approved the amended Audit Committee Charter and the Compensation Committee
Charter. Additionally, the Board of Directors voted unanimously to establish a Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee.
At the
May 26, 2005 Board of Directors meeting, management informed the Board of Directors
that the NYSE was expected in increase its minimum listing requirements, which
was likely to cause the Company to fail to meet the requirements for continued listing on the NYSE.
The Board of Directors directed management to endeavor to meet the NYSEs minimum listing
requirements, and simultaneously evaluate alternative exchanges such as NASDAQ.
Over the next two years, management held numerous meetings with representatives of the NYSE,
and in November 2005 the Company provided a business plan to the NYSE detailing steps to be taken
to increase market capitalization and stockholders equity in an attempt to comply with NYSE
listing requirements, which allowed the Company to continue to remain listed on the NYSE for a
period of eighteen months. The status of the Companys position relative to NYSE listing
requirements and managements discussions with the NYSE were discussed at the Companys August 8,
2005, November 29, 2005, May 25, 2006, August 30, 2006 and November 30, 2006 Board of Directors
meetings. At the November 30, 2006 meeting, in light of the Companys continued failure to comply
with NYSE listing requirements,
31
management provided the Board of Directors with a detailed
presentation on alternatives to NYSE listing.
At the March 27, 2007 Board of Directors meeting, the Board of Directors elected to
voluntarily delist from the NYSE, due to the fact that the Company remained out of compliance with
NYSE listing standards, and the NYSE was scheduled to delist the Companys stock on April 12, 2007.
After a careful review of alternative exchange listing requirements, the Board of Directors
determined that the Company did not meet the minimum requirements of any other major stock
exchanges, and it elected to list the Companys common stock on the OTCBB. The Companys common
stock began trading on the OTCBB on April 16, 2007.
At the January 22, 2008 Board of Directors meeting, the Board of Directors again revisited the
issue of the increased costs to the Company associated with being a public company and determined
to evaluate the Companys options to eliminate the excessive costs and corporate resources required
to continue as a public company. Following that meeting and prior to the June 26, 2008 Board of
Directors meeting, management worked with the Companys outside counsel to evaluate its options and
prepared a briefing for the Board of Directors.
At the June 26, 2008 meeting, the Board of Directors received a briefing from management and
the Companys outside counsel concerning the alternatives available to the Company for a going
private transaction. The Board of Directors requested additional information regarding a reverse
stock split, including information related to the tax consequences of such an action (including any
restriction on federal net operating losses), the valuation of shares, and the number of
shareholders that would need to be cashed out in order to fall below the 300 shareholder threshold
required for a public company to suspend its annual and quarterly filings with the SEC. Following
that meeting, management researched the foregoing questions and the Company engaged VRC to prepare
an independent valuation of the Company.
At the August 26, 2008 Board of Directors meeting, the Board of Directors received a detailed
presentation from management and the Companys outside counsel on a going-private transaction
accomplished through a reverse stock split. The Board of Directors discussed in detail the
potential benefits and costs to such a transaction. The Board of Directors also discussed the
appropriate valuation of shares and the reverse stock split ratio that would be necessary in order
to achieve the desired number of shareholders. The Board of Directors agreed upon the $2.00
valuation for the shares that would be cashed out as a result of the reverse stock split
transaction, subject to the receipt of the fairness opinion from VRC. The Board of Directors also
decided to make a final determination of the reverse stock split ratio at a special board meeting
to be held in September, when VRC would present their fairness opinion.
On September 25, 2008, the Board of Directors received a final briefing from management and
outside counsel on the proposed transaction. The Board of Directors reviewed an analysis of the
costs and benefits of a 1-for-500 reverse stock split and a 1-for-1,000 reverse stock split, and,
via a unanimous written consent, approved a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-500 based on a
variety of factors discussed herein. The Board of Directors also received the fairness opinion
from VRC which found the $2.00 per share Cash Out Price to be fair to the Companys common
stockholders.
32
Summary and Structure
The Board of Directors has authorized and recommends that you approve the Reverse Stock Split.
In the Reverse Stock Split, (i) holders of less than 500 Katy shares will have their shares
cancelled and will receive $2.00 in cash for each Katy share owned immediately prior to the Reverse
Stock Split, and (ii) each stockholder holding 500 or more Katy shares immediately before the
effective time of the Reverse Stock Split will receive one share for each 500 shares held before
the Reverse Stock Split and in lieu of any fractional shares following the Reverse Stock Split,
will receive $2.00 in cash, without interest, for any shares held immediately before the Reverse
Stock Split that result in the fraction. The Reverse Stock Split will take effect on the Effective
Date (the date the Delaware Secretary of State accepts for filing certificate of amendment to our
Certificate). The proposed amendment to our Certificate is attached to this Proxy Statement as
Exhibit B and is incorporated herein by reference.
Generally, the effect of the Reverse Stock Split can be illustrated by the following examples:
|
|
|
Hypothetical Scenario |
|
Result |
Stockholder A holds 450 Katy shares
in a single record account and holds
no other Katy shares.
|
|
Stockholder As 450 shares will be
converted into the right to receive
$900 in cash (450 x $2.00). If
Stockholder A wanted to continue to
be a stockholder after the Reverse
Stock Split, he could purchase an
additional 50 Katy shares far
enough in advance of the Reverse
Stock Split so that the purchase is
complete by the Effective Date. |
|
|
|
Stockholder B holds 450 Katy shares
in a brokerage account and holds no
other shares.
|
|
We intend to treat stockholders
holding common stock in street name
in the same manner as stockholders
whose shares are registered in
their own names, and will ask
banks, brokers and nominees holding
these shares to effect the Reverse
Stock Split for their beneficial
holders. Assuming that they do so,
Stockholder B will receive cash in
the amount of $900 for the 450
shares of common stock held prior
to the Reverse Stock Split. If the
bank, broker or nominee holding
Stockholder Bs shares have
different procedures, or do not
provide us with sufficient
information on Stockholder Bs
holdings, then Stockholder B may or
may not receive cash for his shares
depending on the number of shares
held by the bank, broker or other
nominee, which is the actual record holder of the shares. |
33
|
|
|
Hypothetical Scenario |
|
Result |
Stockholder C holds 600 Katy shares
in a single record account and holds
no other shares. |
|
Stockholder C will hold one Katy
share after the Reverse Stock
Split. Stockholder C will also
receive $200 in cash (100 x $2.00)
in lieu of receiving a fractional
share following the Reverse Stock
Split. |
|
|
|
Stockholder D holds 450 shares in
each of two separate record accounts
for a total of 900 Katy shares.
Stockholder D holds no other Katy
shares.
|
|
After the Reverse Stock Split,
Stockholder D will hold no Katy
Shares. Stockholder D will receive
$1,800 in cash. |
|
|
|
Stockholder E holds 450 Katy shares
in a record account and 100 shares
in a brokerage account. Stockholder
E holds no other Katy shares.
|
|
Each of Stockholder Es holdings
will be treated separately.
Accordingly, assuming the brokerage
firm with whom Stockholder E holds
his shares in street name effects
the Reverse Stock Split for its
beneficial holders, Stockholder E
will receive cash in the amount of
$200 for the 100 Katy shares held
before the Reverse Stock Split.
Stockholder E will receive $900 for
the Katy shares held in the record
account. |
|
|
|
Husband and Wife each hold 450 Katy
shares in separate record accounts
and hold 300 shares jointly in
another record account. They own no
other Katy Shares.
|
|
Shares held in joint accounts will
not be added to shares held
individually in determining whether
a stockholder will remain a
stockholder after the Reverse Stock
Split. In this situation, Husband
and Wife will each be entitled to
receive $900 for the shares held in
their individual record accounts
(450 x $2.00). Further, they will
be entitled to receive $600 for the
Katy shares held in their joint
account (300 x $2.00). Husband and
Wife will hold no Katy shares after
the Reverse Stock Split. If Husband
and Wife wished to continue to be
stockholders after the Reverse
Stock Split, they could transfer a
sufficient number of shares from
one account into another so that at
least 500 Katy shares are held in
one account prior to the Effective
Date. |
The Reverse Stock Split is considered a going-private transaction as defined in Rule 13e-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act because it is intended to terminate the registration of Katy
shares and suspend Katys filing and reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. In
34
connection
with the Reverse Stock Split, we have filed, as required by the Exchange Act, a Rule 13e-3
Transaction Statement on Schedule 13E-3 (the Schedule 13E-3) with the SEC. Please see the section
entitled Available Information.
The Board of Directors may elect to abandon the Reverse Stock Split at any time prior to the
effective date, if in its discretion, the Board of Directors determines that the Reverse Stock
Split is not in the best interests of Katy. Reasons the Board of Directors may withdraw the Reverse
Stock Split proposal include: (1) a change in the nature of the Companys shareholdings that would
prevent us from reducing the number of record holders below 300 as a result of the Reverse Stock
Split; (2) a change in the number of shares to be exchanged for cash in the Reverse Stock Split
that would substantially increase the cost and expense of the Reverse Stock Split (as compared to
what is currently anticipated); or (3) any adverse change in our financial condition that would
render the Reverse Stock Split inadvisable. Please see the section entitled Reverse Stock Split
Proposal Termination of Reverse Stock Split.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has unanimously determined that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best
interests of Katy and its stockholders and is fair to Katys stockholders. The Board of Directors
unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the approval of the Reverse Stock Split.
In addition, each member of the Board of Directors and the executive officers of the Company
have advised the Company that he or she will vote his or her shares as well as the shares with
respect to which they have or share voting power in favor of the Reverse Stock Split.
Description and Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon
Directors and Executive Officers. Our directors and executive officers (collectively
considered to be our affiliates for purposes of the Reverse Stock Split) include the following
individuals: Christopher Anderson, Director; William Andrews, Director; Robert Baratta, Director;
Douglas Brady, Executive Officer; Daniel Carroll, Director; Wallace Carroll, Jr., Director; David
Cooksey, Executive Officer; David Feldman, Executive Officer; Samuel Frieder, Director; Robert
Gail, Executive Officer; Christopher Lacovara, Director; Shant Mardirossian, Director; Joseph
Mata, Executive Officer; Keith Mills, Executive Officer; and Philip Reinkemeyer, Executive Officer.
All directors and executive officers may be reached by contacting the Company, located at 305
Rock Industrial Park Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044, and its telephone number at that location is
(314) 656-4321.
The following tables set forth certain information concerning members of the Board of
Directors of the Company and its executive officers. All of the ages are as of September 19, 2008.
All but one of the Companys directors and executive officers are citizens of the United States.
Keith Mills is a citizen of Canada. All have held their positions described below for at least the
last five years, except as otherwise indicated.
35
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
|
|
Period of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Experience |
|
Other |
|
Service as Katy |
Name |
|
Age |
|
During the Past Five Years |
|
Directorships |
|
Director |
Christopher W. Anderson |
|
|
33 |
|
|
2005 to Present: Partner of
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., a U.S. private equity firm
1998 to 2005: Associate at
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C. |
|
None |
|
2001 to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Andrews |
|
|
76 |
|
|
2004 to Present: Chairman of
Singer Worldwide, a leading seller of consumer and artisan sewing machines
2001 to Present: Chairman of Katy
2001 to 2005: Chairman of Allied Aerospace Industries, Inc., an
aerospace and defense engineering firm and provider of comprehensive aerospace and
defense products and services
2000 to Present: Chairman of Corrections Corp. of America, a
private sector provider of detention and correction services
1997 to Present: Consultant with
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., a U.S. private equity firm |
|
Corrections
Corp. of America
TREX Corp.
OCharleys Inc. |
|
1991 to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert M. Baratta |
|
|
78 |
|
|
2001 to Present: Director of Katy |
|
None |
|
2001 to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel B. Carroll (1) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
2003 to Present: Private Investor
1994 to Present: Partner of Newgrange L.P., a components
supplier to the global footwear industry
1985 to Present: Member and Manager of ATP Manufacturing,
LLC, a manufacturer of molded poly-urethane components
1985 to 2003: Vice President of
ATP Manufacturing, LLC |
|
None |
|
1994 to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. (1) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
2005 to Present: Private Investor
1992 to 2005: Chairman of CRL, Inc., a diversified holding company |
|
None
|
|
1991 to Present |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Daniel B. Carroll and Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. are first cousins. |
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation and |
|
|
|
Period of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Experience |
|
Other |
|
Service as Katy |
Name |
|
Age |
|
During the Past Five Years |
|
Directorships |
|
Director |
David J. Feldman |
|
|
49 |
|
|
2008 (April) to Present:
Chief Executive Officer, President, and a Director of Katy
2007 to 2008: President and Chief Operating Officer of
Airserv Corporation, a service provider to the U.S. aviation industry
2006 to 2007: Private Investor
2002 to 2006: President of Cooper Lighting, a division of
Cooper Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of electrical products |
|
None |
|
2008 (April) to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel P. Frieder |
|
|
44 |
|
|
2006 to Present: Co-Managing
Partner of Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., a U.S. private equity firm
1989 to 2006: Partner of
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C. |
|
Kohlberg
Capital Corporation |
|
2001 to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Lacovara |
|
|
44 |
|
|
2006 to Present: Co-Managing
Partner of Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., a U.S. private equity firm
1988 to 2006: Partner of
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C. |
|
Kohlberg
Capital Corporation |
|
2001 to Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shant Mardirossian |
|
|
41 |
|
|
2005 to Present: Partner and
CFO of Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., a U.S. private equity firm
1999 to 2005: Partner of
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C. |
|
None |
|
2007 to Present |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation and Business Experience |
Name |
|
Age |
|
During the Past Five Years |
Douglas A. Brady |
|
|
58 |
|
|
2007 (May)
to Present: Chief Operating Officer of Continental
Commercial Products, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Katy
2005 to 2007 (May): Vice President, Operations, Katy
1997 to 2005: Vice President, Manufacturing Operations, Omnova
Solutions, Inc., a producer of decorative and functional surfaces,
emulsion polymers and specialty chemicals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David C. Cooksey |
|
|
63 |
|
|
2007 (May)
to Present: Chief Financial Officer of Continental
Commercial Products, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Katy
2006 to Present: Corporate Controller, Katy
2001 to 2006: Corporate Director of Accounting and Assistant
Treasurer, Katy
1999 to 2005: Chief Financial Officer of Continental Commercial
Products, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Feldman |
|
|
49 |
|
|
2008 (April)
to Present: Chief Executive Officer, President, and
a Director of Katy
See further information regarding his business experience above |
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Occupation and Business Experience |
Name |
|
Age |
|
During the Past Five Years |
Robert A. Gail |
|
|
57 |
|
|
2007 (May) to
Present: President of Continental Commercial
Products, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Katy
2005 to 2007 (May): Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Customer
Support, Katy
2002 to 2005: Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Customer
Support of Continental Commercial Products, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Katy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph E. Mata |
|
|
57 |
|
|
2007 (May) to
Present: Vice President, Human Resources of
Continental Commercial Products, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Katy
2005 to 2007 (May): Vice President, Human Resources, Katy
2001 to 2005: Corporate Director, Human Resources, Katy
1995 to 2005: Vice President, Human Resources of Continental
Commercial Products, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Mills |
|
|
64 |
|
|
2008 (January) to Present: Vice President, Abrasives Business
Development and International Sales of Continental Commercial
Products, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Katy
2007 (May) to 2008 (January): Vice President, Field Sales of
Continental Commercial Products, LLC
2005 to 2007 (May): Vice President, International Operations, Katy
1995 to 2005: President of Glit/Gemtex, Ltd., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Katy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip D. Reinkemeyer |
|
|
43 |
|
|
2005 to Present: Corporate Director of Financial Reporting and
Treasurer, Katy
2002 to 2005: Vice President-Finance, Von Hoffmann Corporation, a
major educational textbook printer |
During the past five years, none of the individuals listed above has been a party in any
judicial or administrative proceeding that resulted in a judgment, decree, or final order enjoining
them from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities
laws, or finding any violation with respect to such laws. In addition, none of the above
individuals have been convicted in any criminal proceeding during the past five years, excluding
traffic violations and similar misdemeanors.
Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers. The following tables show (i)
the number of shares of common stock and (ii) the number of shares of preferred stock beneficially
owned by directors and certain executive officers and owned by directors and executive officers as
a group. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, such information is provided as of
the Record Date. According to rules adopted by the SEC, a person is the beneficial owner of
securities if he or she has or shares the power to vote them or to direct their investment or has
the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such securities within 60 days through the exercise of
an option, warrant or right, the conversion of a security or otherwise; it is,
however, unlikely that such options will be exercised because the exercise price is and has
been greater than the market price.
38
COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Class |
|
of Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before |
|
after |
|
|
Amount and Nature |
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse |
|
Reverse |
|
|
of Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Notes |
|
Split |
|
Split |
Christopher W. Anderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Andrews |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
Robert M. Baratta |
|
|
29,935 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
Douglas A. Brady |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Daniel B. Carroll |
|
|
26,400 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. |
|
|
3,110,149 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)(2) |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
David C. Cooksey |
|
|
30,400 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
David J. Feldman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel P. Frieder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Gail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher Lacovara |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shant Mardirossian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph E. Mata |
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
Keith Mills |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
Philip D. Reinkemeyer |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and
executive officers of
Katy as a group (15
persons) |
|
|
3,399,284 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)(2) |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates beneficial ownership of 1% or less |
39
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
Name |
|
Ownership |
|
Notes |
|
of Class |
Christopher W. Anderson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Samuel P. Frieder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Christopher Lacovara |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Shant Mardirossian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and
executive officers of
Katy as a group (4
persons) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates beneficial ownership of 1% or less |
(1) |
|
Includes options to acquire the following number of shares within 60 days: |
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Andrews |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Robert M. Baratta |
|
|
18,000 |
|
Douglas A. Brady |
|
|
150,000 |
|
Daniel B. Carroll |
|
|
21,000 |
|
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. |
|
|
21,000 |
|
David C. Cooksey |
|
|
30,000 |
|
Joseph E. Mata |
|
|
20,000 |
|
Keith Mills |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Philip D. Reinkemeyer |
|
|
20,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares deemed beneficially owned by Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. in his capacity as
trustee of certain trusts for the benefit of members of the Carroll Family (see notes (1) and
(2) under Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners of annual Proxy Statement). |
(3) |
|
Christopher W. Anderson, Samuel P. Frieder, Christopher Lacovara, and Shant Mardirossian have
membership interests in Kohlberg Management IV, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(KMIV). KMIV is the general partner of several entities with ownership interests in KKTY
Holding Company, which currently owns 1,131,551 shares of the Companys convertible preferred
stock, which is convertible into 18,859,183 shares of the Companys common stock. The
preferred stock, at the option of the holder, is convertible upon the earlier of June 28, 2006
or the occurrence of certain fundamental changes in Katy. Through December 31, 2004 (except
under certain circumstances) the holders of the convertible preferred stock were entitled to a
paid-in-kind (PIK) stock dividend. KKTY Holding Company is controlled by several entities,
which have KMIV as their general partner. Each of Messrs. Anderson, Frieder, Lacovara, and
Mardirossian disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities. |
Owners of 5% or More of the Katy Shares. The following table sets forth certain
information regarding the only persons known to Katy to beneficially own more than five percent of
the outstanding Katy shares as of September 19, 2008 and the anticipated ownership percentage after
the Reverse Stock Split:
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Class |
|
Percent of |
Name and Address |
|
Amount and Nature of |
|
|
|
|
|
before |
|
Class |
of Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficial Ownership |
|
Notes |
|
Split |
|
after Split |
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. and
|
|
|
3,110,149 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
the WEC Jr. Trusts
c/o CRL, Inc.
7505 Village Square Drive, Suite 200
Castle Rock, CO 80104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amelia M. Carroll and
|
|
|
3,110,149 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
the WEC Jr. Trusts
c/o CRL, Inc.
7505 Village Square Drive, Suite 200
Castle Rock, CO 80104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP
|
|
|
429,518 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
1299 Ocean Avenue
11th Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset
|
|
|
1,848,573 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
Management Inc., MJG Associates,
Inc., Gabelli Advisers, Inc.
One Corporate Center
Rye, NY 10580-1435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure Regarding
Convertible Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KKTY Holding Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
| * |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
| * |
|
|
| * |
111 Radio Circle
Mount Kisco, NY 10549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. directly holds 171,839 shares and options to acquire 21,000 shares.
He is a trustee of trusts for his and his descendants benefit (the WEC Jr. Trusts) which
collectively hold 804,635 shares. He and certain of the WEC Jr. Trusts own all the
outstanding shares of CRL, Inc. which holds 2,071,036 shares. He is also a trustee of the
Wallace Foundation which holds 32,910 shares. Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. also beneficially owns
8,729 shares directly owned by his wife, Amelia M. Carroll. Amounts shown for Wallace E.
Carroll, Jr. and Amelia M. Carroll reflect multiple counting of shares where more than one of
them is a trustee of a particular trust and is required to report beneficial ownership of
shares that these trusts hold. |
|
(2) |
|
Amelia M. Carroll holds 8,729 shares directly. She is a trustee of the WEC Jr. Trusts which
collectively own 804,635 shares, and the Wallace Foundation which holds 32,910 shares.
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr., her husband, and certain of the WEC Jr. Trusts, of which she is a
trustee, own all the outstanding shares of CRL, Inc., which holds 2,071,036 shares. Amelia M.
Carroll also beneficially owns 171,839 shares and options to acquire 21,000 shares directly
owned by her husband. Amounts shown for Amelia M. Carroll and Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. reflect
multiple counting of shares where more than one of them is a trustee of a particular trust and
is required to report beneficial ownership of shares that these trusts hold. |
|
(3) |
|
Information obtained from Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2007 filed by Dimensional Fund
Advisors LP for the calendar year 2007. |
41
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Information obtained from Schedule 13D dated December 27, 2007, filed by GAMCO Investors,
Inc. (GBL). That Schedule 13D was filed by Mario Gabelli and various entities which he
directly or indirectly controlled or for which he acted as chief investment officer. The
reporting persons beneficially owning the stock shown in the chart are as follows: Gabelli
Funds, LLC (Gabelli Funds) 570,390 shares, GAMCO Asset Management Inc. (GAMCO) 1,084,183
shares, MJG Associates, Inc. (MJG) 100,000 shares, and Gabelli Advisers, Inc. (Gabelli
Advisers) 94,000 shares. Mario Gabelli, GBL and GGCP, Inc. (GGCP) are all deemed to have
beneficial ownership of the securities owned beneficially by each of these persons. Each of
the reporting persons has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and sole power to dispose
or to direct the disposition of the securities reported for it, except that (i) GAMCO does not
have the authority to vote 15,000 of the reported shares, and (ii) Gabelli Funds has sole
dispositive and voting power with respect to the shares of Katy held by the funds so long as
the aggregate voting interest of all joint filers does not exceed 25% of their total voting
interest in Katy, and, in that event, the proxy voting committee of each fund shall vote that
funds shares, (iii) the proxy voting committee of each fund may take and exercise in its sole
discretion the entire voting power with respect to the shares held by such fund under special
circumstances such as regulatory considerations, and (iv) the power of Mario Gabelli, GBL and
GGCP is indirect with respect to securities beneficially owned directly by other reporting
persons. |
|
(5) |
|
KKTY Holding Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, currently owns 1,131,551
shares of the Companys convertible preferred stock, which is convertible into 18,859,183
shares of the Companys common stock. The preferred stock, at the option of the holder, is
convertible upon the earlier of June 28, 2006 or the occurrence of certain fundamental changes
in Katy. Until December 31, 2004 (except under certain circumstances), the holders of the
convertible preferred stock were entitled to a paid-in-kind (PIK) stock dividend. KKTY
Holding Company is controlled by several entities, which have Kohlberg Management IV, L.L.C.,
a Delaware limited liability company (KMIV), as their general partner. Christopher W.
Anderson, Samuel P. Frieder, Christopher Lacovara, and Shant Mardirossian, all of whom are
members of the Board of Directors of Katy, are members of KMIV. Each of Messrs. Anderson,
Frieder, Lacovara, and Mardirossian disclaim beneficial ownership of these securities for
purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and any other purpose. If the preferred shares
were converted into common stock, based upon the ownership level of convertible preferred
stock on the Record Date, the disclosed percentage ownerships of the Katy common stock in the
above table would change as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
Ownership |
|
Percentage Upon |
|
|
Percentage Upon |
|
Conversion After |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Conversion |
|
Split |
Wallace E. Carroll, Jr. |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Amelia M. Carroll |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Gabelli Funds, GAMCO, MJG, Gabelli
Advisers |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
KKTY Holding Company, L.L.C. |
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
71.0 |
% |
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to
holders of Katy shares subject to the Reverse Stock Split. It is not, however, a complete analysis
of all of the potential tax considerations. This summary is based on the provisions of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), the applicable Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder, judicial authority and current administrative rulings and practice, all of
which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. There can be no assurance that the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) will not challenge one or more of the tax
42
consequences described herein, and we have not obtained, nor do we intend to obtain, a ruling from
the IRS or an opinion of counsel with respect to such consequences.
This summary deals only with beneficial owners of Katy shares who hold such shares as capital
assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. This summary does not deal with all aspects
of U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to particular holders in light of their
personal investment circumstances or special status, nor does it address tax considerations
applicable to investors that may be subject to special tax rules, such as banks, financial
institutions, tax-exempt organizations, S corporations, partnerships or other pass-through
entities, insurance companies, broker-dealers, dealers or traders in securities or currencies,
certain U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States, taxpayers subject to
the alternative minimum tax, individual retirement accounts or other tax-deferred accounts, traders
in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities
holdings, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies,
persons that hold Katy shares as a position in a straddle, or as part of a synthetic security or
hedge, conversion transaction, constructive sale or other integrated investment, or U.S.
Holders (as defined below) that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar or Non-U.S.
holders (as defined below), except to the extent described below. Moreover, it does not discuss the
effect of any other U.S. federal tax laws (such as estate and gift tax laws) or applicable state,
local or foreign tax laws.
As used herein, a U.S. Holder, means a beneficial owner of Katy shares that is, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes: (1) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a corporation
created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of
Columbia, (3) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless
of its source, or (4) a trust if either (a) a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision
over the trusts administration and one or more United States persons have the authority to control
all of the trusts substantial decisions or (b) it has a valid election in effect to be treated as
a United States person. A Non-U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of Katy shares that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, an individual, corporation, estate or trust that is not a U.S.
Holder.
If an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a
beneficial owner of Katy shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will
depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships and other
entities that are classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes and persons
holding Katy shares through a partnership or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S.
federal income tax purposes are urged to consult their own tax advisors.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE TAX ADVICE.
INVESTORS CONSIDERING THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO
THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY
TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER OTHER U.S. FEDERAL TAX LAWS OR THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR
FOREIGN TAXING JURISDICTION OR UNDER ANY APPLICABLE TAX TREATY.
43
Characterization of the Reverse Stock Split for Katy Shareholders Not Receiving Cash. If you
receive no cash as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, you will not recognize any gain or loss on
the Reverse Stock Split, and you will have the same adjusted tax basis and holding period in your
Katy shares as you had in such shares immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
Characterization of the Exchange of Katy Shares for Cash. If you receive cash in exchange for Katy
shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, this will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. Under the stock redemption rules of Section 302 of the Code, this exchange of
fractional shares for cash will be treated as a sale or exchange of the shares if the exchange:
(a) results in a complete redemption of the shareholders stock in us, (b) is substantially
disproportionate with respect to the shareholder, or (c) is not essentially equivalent to a
dividend with respect to the shareholder. If none of these three tests (referred to as the
Section 302 tests) is met, such exchange will be treated as a distribution (which we expect to be
taxable as a return of capital and capital gain, unless we have current year earnings and profits
for tax purposes, in which case the distribution may be taxable as dividend) by us to the
shareholder. Each of the Section 302 tests is described in more detail below.
Constructive Ownership of Stock. In determining whether any of the Section 302 tests is satisfied,
a shareholder must take into account both shares actually owned by such shareholder and any shares
considered as owned by such shareholder by reason of certain constructive ownership rules set forth
in Section 318 of the Code. Under these rules, a shareholder generally will be considered to own
shares which the shareholder has the right to acquire by the exercise of an option or warrant or by
conversion or exchange of a security. A shareholder generally will also be considered to own any
shares that are owned (and, in some cases, constructively owned) by some members of the
shareholders family and by some entities (such as corporations, partnerships, trusts and estates)
in which the shareholder, a member of the shareholders family or a related entity has an interest.
Treatment as a Sale or Exchange. If any of the Section 302 tests is satisfied with respect to a
shareholder, and the exchange is therefore treated as a sale or exchange of the Katy shares for
United States federal income tax purposes, the shareholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received by the shareholder and the shareholders tax basis
in the exchanged Katy shares. Gain or loss must be calculated separately with respect to each
block of shares. Any gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain
or loss if the shares have been held for more than one year. Capital gains of individuals derived
with respect to capital assets held for more than one year are eligible for reduced rates of
taxation. Certain limitations apply to the deductibility of capital losses.
Treatment as a Dividend. If none of the Section 302 tests is satisfied with respect to a
shareholder, the shareholder will be treated as having received a distribution in an amount equal
to the amount of cash received by the shareholder. Because we anticipate that we will have no
current year or accumulated earnings and profits for tax purposes, no amounts treated as a
distribution should be taxable as a dividend. Instead, any cash received should be treated first
as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the shareholders basis and, thereafter, as a
capital gain. If, contrary to our expectations, we have current year earnings and profits for tax
purposes, the distribution will be taxable as a dividend to the extent of our available current
year earnings and profits and any cash received in excess of our available current year earnings
and profits will
44
be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the shareholders basis and,
thereafter, as a capital gain. For certain U.S. individual shareholders, dividend income is
currently taxed for federal income tax purposes at the same rate as net long-term capital gain. To
the extent that the exchange of shares for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split is
treated as the receipt by the shareholder of a dividend, the shareholders tax basis in the shares
exchanged will be added to the tax basis of any shares retained by such shareholder.
Special Rules for Corporate Shareholders. A corporate shareholder that does not satisfy any of the
Section 302 tests and that is treated as receiving a dividend as a result of exchanging shares for
cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split may be eligible for the dividends received
deduction. The dividends received deduction is subject to certain limitations. In addition, since
not all shareholders will be exchanging the same proportionate interest in their shares, any amount
received by a corporate shareholder that is treated as a dividend will constitute an extraordinary
dividend under Section 1059 of the Code, which will result in the reduction of tax basis in the
shareholders shares or in gain recognition. Corporate shareholders should consult their tax
advisors as to the tax consequences of dividend treatment in their particular circumstances.
Section 302 Tests. One of the following tests must be satisfied with respect to a shareholder in
order for the exchange of shares by such shareholder for cash pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split
to be treated as a sale or exchange for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
Complete Termination. An exchange of shares for cash in connection with the
Reverse Stock Split will result in a complete termination of a shareholders
interest in us if, in connection with the Reverse Stock Split, either (i) all of
the shares actually and constructively owned by the shareholder are exchanged for
cash, or (ii) all of the shares actually owned by the shareholder are exchanged for
cash and, with respect to constructively owned shares, the shareholder is eligible
to waive (and effectively waives) constructive ownership of all such shares under
procedures described in Section 302(c) of the Code. Shareholders in this position
should consult their tax advisors as to the availability of, and procedures and
conditions for electing, this waiver. |
|
|
|
|
Substantially Disproportionate. The exchange of shares for cash in connection
with the Reverse Stock Split will be substantially disproportionate with respect
to a shareholder if, among other things, after the exchange (i.e., treating all shares exchanged for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split as no longer
outstanding shares), (i) the shareholders percentage ownership of voting shares is
less than 80% of the shareholders percentage ownership of voting shares before the
exchange of shares for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split (i.e.,
treating all shares exchanged for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split
as outstanding shares) and (ii) the shareholder owns less than 50 percent of the
total combined voting power of all classes of stock immediately after the exchange.
For the purpose of these percentage ownership tests, a shareholder will be
considered as owning shares owned directly as well as indirectly through
application of the constructive ownership rules described above. |
45
|
|
|
Not Essentially Equivalent to a Dividend. In order for the exchange of shares
by a shareholder in connection with the Reverse Stock Split to qualify as not
essentially equivalent to a dividend the shareholder must experience a meaningful
reduction in his proportionate interest in us as a result of the exchange, taking
into account the constructive ownership rules. Whether the sale by a shareholder
pursuant to the offer will result in a meaningful reduction of the shareholders
proportionate interest will depend on the shareholders particular facts and
circumstances. The IRS has indicated in a published ruling that even a small
reduction in the proportionate interest of a small minority shareholder (for
example, less than 1%) in a publicly held corporation who exercises no control over
corporate affairs may constitute a meaningful reduction. Shareholders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of this test to their
particular circumstances. |
Each shareholder is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor as to the application of the
Section 302 tests to his or her particular circumstances.
Non-U.S. Holders. The United States federal income tax rules governing Non-U.S. Holders are
complex and the following is only a limited summary of some general rules applicable to certain
Non-U.S. Holders. All Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the United
States federal, state and local tax consequences, including tax reporting requirements, of the
exchange of shares for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. As described in Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Federal Income Tax Withholding below, the
depositary will withhold 30% of any gross payments made to a Non-U.S. Holder pursuant to the
Reverse Stock Split unless a reduced rate of withholding or an exemption from withholding is
applicable.
If a Non-U.S. Holders exchange of shares for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split is
characterized as a sale or exchange, rather than as a dividend, the shareholder generally will not
be subject to United States federal income tax on such exchange unless:
|
(i) |
|
in the case of a nonresident alien individual, the individual is
present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the
disposition and certain other conditions are met; or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the gain is effectively connected with a United States trade or
business or, if certain tax treaties apply, the gain is attributable to a permanent
establishment maintained by the shareholder in the United States. |
If exception (i) above applies, the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax at a rate of 30% (or at a reduced rate under an applicable income tax treaty) on the
amount by which such Non-U.S. Holders capital gains allocable to U.S. sources exceed capital
losses allocable to U.S. sources during the taxable year of the disposition of the shares. If
exception (ii) applies, the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax
with respect to such gain in the same manner as a United States person, unless otherwise provided
in an applicable income tax treaty, and a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation for U.S.
46
federal income tax purposes may also be subject to a branch profits tax with respect to such gain
at a rate of 30% (or at a reduced rate under an applicable income tax treaty).
If a Non-U.S. Holder is not subject to United States federal income tax, the shareholder may be
entitled to a refund of the tax withheld by the depositary. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their
own tax advisors regarding the possibility of obtaining a refund.
If a Non-U.S. Holder does not satisfy any of the Section 302 tests explained above, the full amount
received by the Non-U.S. Holder will be treated as a distribution to the Non-U.S. Holder with
respect to the Non-U.S. Holders shares. The treatment, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, of
such distribution as a dividend, a tax-free return of capital or as capital gain will be determined
in the manner described above (See Material United States
Federal Income Tax Consequences Treatment as a Dividend).
Federal Income Tax Withholding. To prevent backup federal income tax withholding equal to 28% of
the gross payments payable in connection with the exchange of shares for cash pursuant to the
Reverse Stock Split, each shareholder who is a U.S. Holder and who does not otherwise establish an
exemption from backup withholding must provide the depositary with the shareholders correct
taxpayer identification number (employer identification number or social security number), or
certify that the taxpayer is awaiting a taxpayer identification number, and provide certain other
information by completing, under penalties of perjury, the Substitute Form W-9 included in the
letter of transmittal. If a shareholder properly certifies that such shareholder is awaiting a
taxpayer identification number, 28% of any payment during the 60-day period following the date of
the Substitute Form W-9 will be retained by the depositary and, if the shareholder properly
furnishes his or her taxpayer identification number within that 60-day period, the depositary will
remit the amount retained to such shareholder and will not withhold amounts from future payments
under the backup withholding rules. If the shareholder does not properly furnish his or her
taxpayer identification number within that 60-day period, the amount retained will be remitted to
the IRS as backup withholding and backup withholding will apply to future payments.
The depositary will withhold United States federal income taxes equal to 30% of the gross payments
payable to a Non-U.S. Holder unless the depositary and we determine that an exemption is available.
For example, an applicable income tax treaty may reduce or eliminate such tax, in which event a
Non-U.S. Holder claiming a reduction in or exemption from such tax under the applicable income tax
treaty provides through the third party withholding agent a properly completed IRS Form W-8BEN (or
suitable successor form claiming the benefit of the applicable tax treaty). Alternatively, an
exemption applies if the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the
Non-U.S. Holder and the Non-U.S. Holder provides an appropriate statement to that effect on a
properly completed IRS Form W-8ECI (or suitable successor or substitute form).
47
Information Reporting. Information statements will be provided to shareholders whose shares are
exchanged for cash in connection with the Reverse Stock Split and to the IRS, reporting the payment
of the total purchase price (except with respect to shareholders that are exempt from the
information reporting rules, such as corporations).
Unavailability of Appraisal or Dissenters Rights
No appraisal or dissenters rights are available under Delaware Law to holders of Katy shares
who do not vote in favor of the Reverse Stock Split.
Accounting Treatment
We anticipate that we will account for the Reverse Stock Split by treating the shares
repurchased as treasury shares.
Share Certificates
We have appointed the Transfer Agent to act as exchange agent to carry out the exchange of
share certificates held by Cashed Out Holders for cash and for any other holders of fractional
shares for cash. On the Effective Date, all share certificates evidencing ownership of Katy shares
held by Cashed Out Holders shall be deemed cancelled without further action by either the Cashed
Out Holders or Katy. Thereafter, such certificates, rather than representing an ownership interest
in Katy, will represent only the right to receive cash in the amount of $2.00 per Katy share upon
their surrender. The shares acquired by Katy in connection with the Reverse Stock Split will be
held in Katys treasury.
In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, Katy shares will be assigned a new CUSIP number.
As a result, the share certificates held by Continuing Holders will be exchanged for new
certificates bearing the new CUSIP number. After the Effective Date, share certificates held by
Continuing Holders will represent the right to receive (i) a new share certificate with the new
CUSIP number representing one share for each 500 shares outstanding prior to the Reverse Stock
Split, and (ii) in lieu of any fractional shares of less than a whole share following the Reverse
Stock Split, $2.00 in cash, without interest, for each share held immediately before the Reverse
Stock Split that results in the fraction.
The Transfer Agent will furnish to you the necessary materials and instructions to surrender
your Katy share certificate(s) promptly following the Effective Date. The letter of transmittal
will explain how the certificates are to be surrendered for either cash or a new certificate. You
must complete and sign the letter of transmittal and return it with your certificate(s) to the
Transfer Agent as instructed before you can receive the cash payment or new certificate(s). DO NOT
SEND YOUR CERTIFICATES TO US AND DO NOT SEND THEM TO THE TRANSFER AGENT UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER AND FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS THEREIN.
No service charges will be payable by shareholders in connection with the exchange of
certificates or the payment of cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares. Katy will pay all
administrative expenses of the Reverse Stock Split.
48
Termination of Reverse Stock Split
Under applicable Delaware Law, the Board of Directors has a duty to act in the best interest
of the Companys stockholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors reserves the right to abandon
the Reverse Stock Split, if for any reason the Board of Directors determines that, in the best
interest of the Companys stockholders, it is not advisable to proceed with the Reverse Stock
Split, even assuming the stockholders approve the transaction by vote. Although the Board of
Directors presently believes that the Reverse Stock Split is in Katys best interests and has
recommended a vote for the Reverse Stock Split, the Board of Directors nonetheless believes that it
is prudent to recognize that circumstances could possibly change prior to the Special Meeting such
that it might not be appropriate or desirable to effect the Reverse Stock Split at that time. Such
reasons include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
Any change in the nature of the Katys shareholdings prior to the Effective Date
which would result in us being unable to reduce the number of record holders of Katy shares to below 300 as a result of the Reverse Stock Split; |
|
|
|
|
Any change in the number of our record holders that would enable us to deregister
the Katy shares under the Exchange Act without effecting the Reverse Stock Split; |
|
|
|
|
Any change in the number of Katy shares that will be exchanged for cash in
connection with the Reverse Stock Split that would increase the cost and expense of the
Reverse Stock Split from that which is currently anticipated; or |
|
|
|
|
Any adverse change in our financial condition that would render the Reverse Stock
Split inadvisable. |
If the Board of Directors decides to withdraw the Reverse Stock Split from the agenda of the
Special Meeting, the Board of Directors will promptly notify our stockholders of the decision by
mail and by announcement at the Special Meeting.
Unclaimed Property Laws
The unclaimed property and escheat laws of each state provide that under circumstances defined
in that states statutes, holders of unclaimed or abandoned property must surrender that property
to the state. Cashed Out Holders who do not return their share certificates and request payment of
the Cash Out Price or Continuing Holders who do not request payment for any fractional shares they
may hold following the Reverse Stock Split generally will have a period of time from the Effective
Date in which to claim from the Company the cash payment to which they are entitled. States may
have abandoned property laws which call for such state to obtain either (i) custodial possession of
property that has been unclaimed until the owner reclaims it, or (ii) escheat of such property to
the state. The holding period or the time period which must elapse before the property is deemed
to be abandoned may vary by state. If we do not have an address for the holder of record of the
shares, then unclaimed cash out payments would be turned over to our state of incorporation, the
State of Delaware, in accordance with its escheat laws.
49
Regulatory Approvals
Katy is not aware of any material governmental or regulatory approval required for completion
of the Reverse Stock Split, other than compliance with the relevant federal and state securities
laws and Delaware corporate laws.
50
OPINION OF VALUATION RESEARCH COMPANY
The Board of Directors retained VRC to provide the Fairness Opinion. On September 25, 2008,
VRC delivered the Fairness Opinion to the Board of Directors. The Fairness Opinion states that,
based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, as of September 19, 2008,
the Cash Out Price is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Companys common stockholders.
VRC also presented to the Board of Directors a summary of the analyses described below.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE FAIRNESS OPINION IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A TO THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND IS
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE FAIRNESS OPINION CAREFULLY AND
IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE FAIRNESS OPINION IS ALSO AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AND COPYING AT KATYS
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES LOCATED AT 305 ROCK INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, BRIDGETON, MISSOURI 63044.
The Board of Directors selected VRC as its financial advisor because it is a recognized
financial advisory firm that has substantial experience and is knowledgeable and familiar with the
operations of Katy and its business. As part of its business, VRC regularly engages in the
valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures,
leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations, financings, and financial and tax reporting matters.
VRC has served as consultant to Katy in the past, performing a valuation analysis of the
Companys subsidiary, Gemtex, Ltd., in connection with the transfer of ownership of that subsidiary
to another Katy entity. VRC was paid $15,000 for that valuation analysis.
In rendering the Fairness Opinion, VRC conducted such reviews, analyses and inquiries they
deemed appropriate under the circumstances. Among other things, VRC:
|
|
|
Reviewed publicly available information concerning the Company, including its Forms
10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 through 2007 and its Forms 10-Q for
the first and second quarters of fiscal years 2007 and 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed various internal monthly financial statement reports of the Company since
December 2007 including the most recent report for July 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the Companys financial projections for fiscal years 2008 through 2012 and
the material assumptions associated therewith for each of the Best Case Plan, the Most
Likely Case Plan and the Stable Plan (as such plans have been labeled in the materials
provided to VRC); |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the confidential information memorandum for Continental Commercial Products
dated June 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the restated certificate of incorporation of the Company which was filed
with the SEC on July 13, 2001; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the industry in which the Company operates, which included a review of (i)
certain publicly traded companies deemed comparable to Katy and (ii) certain mergers
and acquisitions involving businesses deemed comparable to Katys; |
51
|
|
|
Had discussions with certain members of Katys management team with respect to the
past, present, and future operating and financial conditions of Katy, among other
subjects; |
|
|
|
|
Performed discounted cash flow analyses based on Katys forecast; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed historical stock prices for the Company; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the internally prepared monthly orders, broken down by each division, of
Katy for fiscal year 2007; |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed publicly available information regarding the financial terms of certain
transactions that are comparable, in whole or in part, to the Reverse Stock Split; |
|
|
|
|
Developed indications of value for Katy using generally accepted valuation
methodology; and |
|
|
|
|
Conducted such other reviews, analyses and inquiries and considered such other
economic, industry, market, financial, and other information and data deemed
appropriate by VRC. |
VRC relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness
of all data, material and other information furnished, or otherwise made available, to VRC,
discussed with or reviewed by VRC, or publicly available, and does not assume any responsibility
with respect to the accuracy or completeness of such data, material and other information. In
addition, management of Katy has advised VRC, and VRC has assumed, that the financial forecasts and
projections have been reasonably and prudently prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of management as to the future financial results and conditions
of the Company, and VRC expresses no opinion with respect to such forecasts and projections or the
assumptions on which they are based.
VRC has not been requested to make, and has not made, any independent evaluation of the
Companys solvency or creditworthiness, any physical inspection or independent appraisal or
evaluation of any of the assets, properties or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company
or any other party, nor was VRC provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. VRC expresses no
opinion regarding the liquidation value of any entity. Furthermore, VRC has undertaken no
independent analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted
claims or other contingent liabilities, to which the Company is or may be a party, or is or may be
subject, or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent
liabilities to which the Company is or may be a party, or is or may be subject.
VRC has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that there has been no
material change in the assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, business or
prospects of the Company since the date of the most recent financial statements provided to VRC,
and that there are no facts or other information that would make any of the information reviewed by
VRC incomplete or misleading. VRC has further assumed that there will be no subsequent events that
could materially affect the conclusions set forth in the Fairness Opinion. Such subsequent events
include, without limitation, adverse changes in industry or market conditions; changes to the
business, financial condition and results of operations of the
52
Company; changes in the terms of the Reverse Stock Split; and the failure to consummate the Reverse
Stock Split within a reasonable period of time.
VRC has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the Reverse Stock
Split will be consummated on the same terms as described by management, (b) all conditions to the
consummation of the Reverse Stock Split will be satisfied within a reasonable period of time
without waiver thereof, and (c) the Reverse Stock Split will be consummated in a timely manner in
accordance with the terms described to us, without any amendments or modifications thereto or any
adjustment to the Cash Out Price.
The Fairness Opinion is necessarily based on economic, financial, industry, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to VRC as of, September 19, 2008.
Except as set forth in the engagement letter, VRC has not undertaken, and is under no obligation,
to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw the Fairness Opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider
events occurring after September 19, 2008. The Fairness Opinion is solely for the Companys Board
of Directors and the stockholders of the Company. VRC has not been requested to opine in the
Fairness Opinion as to, and the Fairness Opinion does not address, (i) the underlying business
decision of the Companys management, the Company, its security holders or any other party to
proceed with or effect the Reverse Stock Split, (ii) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the
Reverse Stock Split not expressly addressed in the Opinion, (iii) the fairness of any portion or
aspect of the Reverse Stock Split to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other
constituencies of the Company or any other party other than those set forth in the Opinion, (iv)
the relative merits of the Reverse Stock Split as compared to any alternative business strategies
that might exist for the Company or any other party or the effect of any other transactions in
which the Company, or any other party might engage, (v) the legal, tax or financial reporting
consequences of the Reverse Stock Split to either the Company, its respective security holders, or
any other party, or (vi) the solvency or fair value of the Company or any other participant in the
Reverse Stock Split under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar
matters.
In addition, VRC expresses no opinion or recommendation as to how any shareholder or member of
the Board of Directors should vote or act in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.
VRC has not been involved in the structuring, documentation or negotiation of the Reverse
Stock Split and has not, other than through the delivery of the Fairness Opinion and VRCs review
and analysis undertaken in connection therewith as described herein, provided any financial
advisory or investment banking services to the Company related to or associated with the Reverse
Stock Split.
VRCs opinion does not include any considerations concerning strategic, operating and
financial synergies that may result from the Reverse Stock Split.
VRCs fees and expenses for the work associated with the Fairness Opinion are not contingent
on the consummation of the Reverse Stock Split or any matters related to or associated therewith.
53
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by VRC in connection
with the preparation of the Fairness Opinion. These summaries of financial analyses alone do not
constitute a complete description of the financial analyses VRC employed in reaching its
conclusions. The order of analyses described does not represent relative importance or weight given
to those analyses by VRC. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information
presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together with the full text of each summary
and are alone not a complete description of VRCs financial analyses. Except as otherwise noted,
the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on
market data as it existed on or before September 19, 2008, and is not necessarily indicative of
current market conditions.
Comparable Public Companies Method. A Comparable Public Companies analysis determines
the value of the Company based on relative valuation metrics observed from publicly traded
companies which VRC believed to be reasonably similar to certain operations of Katy. VRC derived
indication for the Companys value by applying a multiple to forecasted EBITDA under various
scenarios prepared by Company management known as the Stable Case, Most Likely Case and Best Case.
Two factors led VRC to use Katys projected EBITDA in the analysis: first, the downturn in U.S.
economy and softness in food services and building industries have led to Katy generating negative
EBITDA during the latest twelve months (a negative EBITDA being meaningless in a market multiple
analysis) and second, Katys plan to discontinue its consumer business line in fiscal 2009. For
these reasons, VRC considered only indications of enterprise value using projected EBITDA figures
for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. VRC selected the public companies based on the following criteria:
(i) manufacturer and/or distributor of plastics, abrasive and cleaning products, (ii) positive
EBITDA, and (iii) reasonable financial information available. VRC believed that the selected public
companies have certain business operations, financial characteristics and fundamental economic and
industry drivers that provide a reasonable basis for comparison to Katy for valuation purposes.
VRC applied these multiples to the Companys projections and determined an Implied Enterprise Value
of $12.1 million to $17.4 million under the Stable Case, $17.8 million to $30.6 million under the
Most Likely Case and $23.7 million to $62.0 million under the Best Case scenarios. In calculating
the range of implied per share values for the Company, VRC considered the impact of deducting the
liquidation value of the preferred stock of $113.2 million on the Implied Total Equity Value, as
well as the impact of assuming that all of the preferred stock was converted into common stock.
VRC noted that deducting the liquidation value of the preferred stock resulted in no remaining
value for the common stockholders. In addition, VRC considered the impact on the range of per
share equity values (assuming all of the preferred stock had converted into common shares)
resulting from incrementally deducting (i) the net debt of $13.7 million and (ii) the recorded
amount of contingent liabilities on the June 30, 2008 balance sheet of $14.5 million. When both
amounts were deducted from the Implied Enterprise Value of the Company, the Implied Total Equity
Value of the Company was found to be within a range of $0 to $33.7 million. When divided by the
number of shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis (including the conversion of the preferred
stock), VRC found the Implied Total Equity Value of the Company to be within a range of $0.00 to
$1.26 per share using the Comparable Public Companies analysis.
54
Comparable Companies Analysis (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise |
|
|
NFY+1 |
|
|
NFY+1 Sales |
|
|
NFY+1 |
|
|
NFY+1 EBITDA |
|
|
NFY+1 EBITDA |
|
|
NFY+1 EBITDA |
|
Companies |
|
Ticker |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Growth |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
Growth |
|
|
Margin |
|
|
Multiple |
|
3 M Company |
|
MMM |
|
$ |
54,202.0 |
|
|
$ |
29,165.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
$ |
7,815.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
6.9x |
|
Newell Rubbermaid Inc |
|
NWL |
|
$ |
8,086.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,274.5 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,108.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3x |
|
MSC Industrial Direct |
|
MSM |
|
$ |
3,329.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,045.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
$ |
406.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
8.2x |
|
Ecolab Inc |
|
ECL |
|
$ |
13,446.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,036.0 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,323.0 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
10.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Min |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,329.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,045.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
$ |
406.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
6.9x |
|
Median |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,766.5 |
|
|
$ |
7,155.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,215.8 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
7.7x |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,766.1 |
|
|
$ |
11,380.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
$ |
2,663.3 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
8.1x |
|
Max |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,202.0 |
|
|
$ |
29,165.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
$ |
7,815.0 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
10.2x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KATY Industries Inc. |
|
KATY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Stable Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
180.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
- Most Likely Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184.7 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
- Best Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
199.8 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
|
161.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
|
NFY +1= Next fiscal year plus one(fiscal year) 2010. |
|
§ |
|
Sources: SEC filings, company reports, Bloomberg, and FactSet |
|
§ |
|
VRC primarily selected the comparable public companies based on the following
criteria: (i) manufacturer and/or distributor of plastics, abrasive and cleaning products (ii)
positive EBITDA and (iii) reasonable financial information available. VRC believes that the
selected comparable public companies have certain business operations, financial characteristics
and fundamental economic and industry drivers that provide a reasonable basis for comparison to
KATY for valuation purposes. |
|
§ |
|
VRC has adjusted historical amounts for nonrecurring & unusual items,
acquisitions, divestitures and other events where it was deemed appropriate. |
|
§ |
|
Due to
the inherent differences between the businesses, operations and prospects of KATY and the
businesses, operations and prospects of each of the selected comparable companies, VRC believed
that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results
derived for the comparable companies and accordingly also made qualitative judgments concerning
differences between the financial and operating characteristics and prospects of KATY versus the
comparable companies. |
No company or business used in this analysis is identical to Katy or its business.
Accordingly, an evaluation of the results of these analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather,
this analysis involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and
operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading or other values of
the companies or business segments to which Katy was compared.
Comparable Transactions Method. A Comparable Transactions analysis determines the
value of the Company based on relative valuation metrics observed for acquisitions of comparable
businesses. VRC derived indications for the Companys value by applying a multiple to both full
year 2007 EBITDA results as well as forecasted EBITDA under various scenarios known as the Stable
Case, Most Likely Case and Best Case as provided by management. As acquisition multiples for
Comparable Transactions are typically reported on an LTM (Latest Twelve Months) basis, VRC gave
some consideration to 2007 EBITDA results as well as forecasted 2008 results. LTM results were not
considered due to the Company reporting negative EBITDA results. VRC analyzed ten transactions
believed to be a representative sample of transactions involving acquisitions of companies involved
in or in the plastics, abrasive or cleaning supplies manufacturing industry. VRC believed that the
acquired companies have certain business operations, financial characteristics and fundamental
economic and industry drivers that provide a reasonable basis for comparison to Katy for valuation
purposes. VRC applied these multiples to the Companys 2007 results and 2009 projections and
determined an Implied Enterprise Value of $15.3 million to $17.4 million based on 2007 results,
$14.1 million to $16.1 million under the Stable Case, $20.8 million to $23.7 million under the Most
Likely Case and $27.6 million to $31.5 million under the Best Case scenarios. In calculating the
range of implied per share values for the Company, VRC considered the impact of deducting the
liquidation value of the preferred stock of $113.2 million on the Implied Total Equity Value, as
55
well as the impact of assuming that all of the preferred stock was converted into common stock.
VRC noted that deducting the liquidation value of the preferred stock resulted in no remaining
value for the common stockholders. In addition, VRC considered the impact on the range of per
share equity values (assuming all of the preferred stock had converted into common shares)
resulting from incrementally deducting (i) the net debt of $13.7 million and (ii) the recorded
amount of contingent liabilities on the June 30, 2008 balance sheet of $14.5 million. When both
amounts were deducted from the Implied Enterprise Value of the Company, the Implied Total Equity
Value of the Company was found to be within a range of $0 to $3.3 million. When divided by the
number of shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis (including the conversion of the preferred
stock), VRC found the Implied Total Equity Value of the Company to be within a range of $0.00 to
$0.12 per share using the Comparable Transactions analysis.
Comparable Transactions Analysis (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Data |
|
Multiples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announce |
|
Enterprise |
|
LTM |
|
LTM |
|
EBITDA |
|
EV/ |
Acquirer |
|
Target |
|
Target Description |
|
Date |
|
Value |
|
Sales |
|
EBITDA |
|
Margin |
|
EBITDA |
Lime Rock Management LP /
Thompson Street Capital
Managers LLC |
|
Industrial Rubber Products, Inc. |
|
Designs and produces protective
materials, products, and equipment |
|
|
08/19/2008 |
|
|
$ |
90.1 |
|
|
$ |
55.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
6.5x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest JLK Corp. |
|
Industrial Distribution Group, Inc. |
|
Distributes a full line of industrial maintenance, repair, operating, and production products |
|
|
04/07/2008 |
|
|
$ |
126.2 |
|
|
$ |
529.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
14.8x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Sands, Inc. |
|
Natural Choices Home Safe Products LLC |
|
Manufactures household cleaning products |
|
|
01/29/2008 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
13.8x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Castle Harlan, Inc. |
|
Nylex Ltd. |
|
Manufactures and markets consumer and industrial products |
|
|
11/23/2007 |
|
|
$ |
179.1 |
|
|
$ |
261.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proventec PLC |
|
Contico Manufacturing Ltd. |
|
Manufactures and distributes plastic cleaning products |
|
|
06/07/2007 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
10.6x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
|
Myers Industries, Inc. |
|
Manufactures polymer and metal products for industrial, commercial, and consumer markets |
|
|
04/24/2007 |
|
|
$ |
1,059.3 |
|
|
$ |
780.0 |
|
|
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
11.9x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckingham Capital LLC |
|
CPAC, Inc. |
|
Manufactures and sells cleaning products |
|
|
12/26/2006 |
|
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
|
$ |
93.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
7.4x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rotonics Holding Corp. |
|
Rotonics Manufacturing, Inc. |
|
Manufactures plastic containers and related items |
|
|
08/29/2006 |
|
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
|
$ |
48.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Acquisition Co. LLC |
|
Home Products International, Inc. |
|
Markets and manufactures home organization and consumer products |
|
|
10/29/2004 |
|
|
$ |
149.5 |
|
|
$ |
247.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.5 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
6.1x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hako-Werke GmbH |
|
Minuteman International, Inc. |
|
Manufactures and distributes commercial and industrial cleaning equipment |
|
|
04/05/2004 |
|
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
12.1x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Min |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
5.5x |
|
|
|
|
|
Median |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
9.0x |
|
|
|
|
|
Mean |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
175.3 |
|
|
$ |
210.7 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.5x |
|
|
|
|
|
Max |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,059.3 |
|
|
$ |
780.0 |
|
|
$ |
89.3 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
14.8x |
|
|
|
Sources: SEC filings, company reports, Bloomberg, MergerStat and FactSet. |
|
|
|
The selected transactions are believed to be a representative sample of transactions
involving acquisitions of plastic/abrasive manufacturing companies. VRC believes that the
selected comparable transactions involve target businesses that have certain business
operations, financial characteristics and fundamental economic and industry drivers that
provide a reasonable basis for comparison to KATY for valuation purposes. |
No company, transaction or business used in this analysis is identical to Katy. Accordingly,
an evaluation of the results of these analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, this analysis
involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition or other values of the
companies, business segments or transactions to which Katy was compared.
Discounted Cash Flow. For this valuation approach, VRC prepared an illustrative
discounted cash flow analysis of the Company to determine a range of implied present values of the
Companys common stock. In preparing its discounted cash flow analysis, VRC was provided with a
fiscal year 2008 budget prepared by management of the Company, financial forecasts prepared by
management for each of the Best Case Plan, the Most Likely Case Plan and the Stable Plan (as such
plans have been labeled in the materials provided to VRC), other
56
financial information prepared by
management relating to material business and operational events, and also had discussions with the
Companys management. VRC used terminal multiples ranging from 6.5x to 7.5x projected 2013 EBITDA
to determine a terminal value of the
Company. VRC applied a range of discount rates for each case; 14.5% to 15.5% for the Stable
Case, 17.5% to 18.5% for the Most Likely Case, and 20.5% to 21.5% for the Best Case. The discount
rates used by VRC in this analysis were derived by VRC utilizing professional judgment and
experience, based on a weighted average cost of capital analysis. The future cash flows were
discounted by the appropriate discount rate used in each Case to determine the present value of
those cash flows and the Implied Enterprise Value of the Company. These analyses found the Implied
Enterprise Value of the Company to be $20.5 million to $23.9 million under the Stable Case, $37.6
million to $44.5 million under the Most Likely Case and $77.8 million to $92.1 million under the
Best Case. In calculating the range of implied per share values for the Company, VRC considered
the impact of deducting the liquidation value of the preferred stock of $113.2 million on the
Implied Total Equity Value, as well as the impact of assuming that all of the preferred stock was
converted into common stock. VRC noted that deducting the liquidation value of the preferred stock
resulted in no remaining value for the common stockholders. In addition, VRC considered the impact
on the range of per share equity values (assuming all of the preferred stock had converted into
common shares) resulting from incrementally deducting, (i) the net debt of $13.7 million and (ii)
the recorded amount of contingent liabilities on the June 30, 2008 balance sheet of $14.5 million.
When both amounts were deducted from the Implied Enterprise Value of the Company, the Implied Total
Equity Value of the Company was found to be within a range of $0 to $63.9 million. When divided by
the number of shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis (including the conversion of the
preferred stock), VRC found the Implied Total Equity Value of the Company to be within a range of
$0.00 to $2.38 per share using the Discounted Cash Flow analysis.
57
Enterprise and Equity Value Conclusion As Converted Basis (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Enterprise Value |
|
|
Stable Case |
|
Most Likely Case |
|
Best Case |
Valuation Methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Public Companies Method |
|
$ |
12,104 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
17,390 |
|
|
$ |
17,804 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
30,587 |
|
|
$ |
23,654 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
61,952 |
|
Comparable Transactions Method |
|
$ |
14,121 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
16,138 |
|
|
$ |
20,771 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
23,738 |
|
|
$ |
27,596 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
31,538 |
|
Discounted Cash Flow Method |
|
$ |
20,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
23,900 |
|
|
$ |
37,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
44,400 |
|
|
$ |
77,700 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
92,100 |
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Liabilities [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Total Equity Value |
|
|
Stable Case |
|
Most Likely Case |
|
Best Case |
Valuation Methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Public Companies Method |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
33,713 |
|
Comparable Transactions Method |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3,299 |
|
Discounted Cash Flow Method |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
9,261 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
16,161 |
|
|
$ |
49,461 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
63,861 |
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,131,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, as converted basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,859,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,951,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding
(as converted basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,810,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Share |
|
|
Stable Case |
|
Most Likely Case |
|
Best Case |
Valuation Methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable Public Companies Method |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
Comparable Transactions Method |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Discounted Cash Flow Method |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
2.38 |
|
|
|
|
[1]: |
|
Contingent liabilities as of second quarter ended June 2008 as provided by Katy management. |
Conclusion. Based upon the foregoing analyses and the assumptions and limitations set
forth in full in the text of the Fairness Opinion, VRC is of the opinion that, as of the date of
the Fairness Opinion, the Cash Out Price of $2.00 per common share is fair, from a financial point
of view, to the Companys common stockholders.
Engagement of VRC
Katy has agreed to pay VRC a fee of approximately $60,000 in addition to hourly rates for the
review of certain materials, and to reimburse VRC for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related
to its engagement whether or not the Reverse Stock Split is consummated. No compensation received
or to be received by VRC is based on or is contingent on the results of VRCs engagement. There are
no other current arrangements to compensate VRC, its affiliates or unaffiliated representatives for
any services rendered to Katy, its executive officers, directors or affiliates. VRC has previously
provided consulting services to Katy. In addition, VRC has provided, may currently be providing,
and in the future may provide valuation or advisory services to affiliates of Kohlberg & Company,
and have received and in the future may receive fees for rendering of these services. None of
VRCs employees who worked on the engagement has any known financial interest in the assets or
equity of Katy or the outcome of the engagement.
58
MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
All shares of the Companys common stock, par value $1.00 per share (Common Stock),
represented at the Special Meeting by properly executed proxies received prior to or at the Special
Meeting and not revoked will be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the instructions
thereon. If no instructions are indicated, properly executed proxies will be voted FOR the approval
of the Reverse Stock Split. You may receive more than one proxy card depending on how your shares
are held. For example, you may hold some of your shares individually, some jointly with your spouse
and some in trust for your children in which case you will receive three separate proxy cards to
vote. The Company does not know of any matters, other than those described in the Notice of Special
Meeting, that are to come before the Special Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented
at the Special Meeting for action, the Board of Directors, as proxy for the stockholder, will have
the discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with its best judgment.
Time and Place
The Special Meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. local time, on ___, 2008, at the Holiday Inn
Mount Kisco, located at One Holiday Inn Drive, Mount Kisco, New York.
Revoking Your Proxy
A proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time before it is voted.
Proxies may be revoked by: (i) filing with the Secretary of the Company at or before the Special
Meeting a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy; (ii) duly executing a
subsequent proxy relating to the same shares and delivering it to the Secretary of the Company at
or before the Special Meeting; or (iii) attending the Special Meeting and voting in person
(although attendance at the Special Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of a
proxy). Any written notice revoking a proxy should be delivered to Secretary, Katy Industries,
Inc., 305 Rock Industrial Park Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044.
Record Date
Only Katy stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to
vote at the Special Meeting. Each stockholder will be entitled to cast one vote for each Katy share
then owned. According to Katys records, as of the Record Date, there were 7,951,176 votes entitled
to be cast at the Special Meeting.
Quorum and Required Vote
A majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote, present
in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the
Special Meeting. Proxies marked to abstain and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of
determining a quorum.
Under Delaware Law, the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the issued and outstanding
Katy shares as of the Record Date is necessary to approve the Reverse Stock Split. The executive
officers and directors of Katy, who together own approximately 39.1% of the
59
voting power of the Katy shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting, have
indicated they will vote in favor of the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders holding Katy shares in
street name should review the information provided to them by their nominee (such as a broker or
bank). This information will describe the procedures to follow to instruct the nominee how to vote
the street name shares and how to revoke previously given instructions. The proposal to approve the
Reverse Stock Split is a non-discretionary item, meaning that nominees cannot vote Katy shares in
their discretion on behalf of a client if the client has not given them voting instructions. Shares
held in street name that are not voted by brokerage firms or other nominees are referred to as
broker non-votes. Because the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Katy shares is
necessary to approve the Reverse Stock Split, broker non-votes and abstentions will have the same
effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal to approve the Reverse Stock Split.
The Board of Directors urges you to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy and to return
it promptly in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope so that a quorum can be assured for the
Special Meeting and your Katy shares can be voted as you wish.
Solicitation and Costs
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors by Morrow & Co., LLC. In
addition, proxies may be solicited by the directors, officers and other employees of Katy, in
person or by telephone, telegraph, mail, facsimile or electronic mail only for use at the Special
Meeting. Katy will bear the costs of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this Proxy
Statement and the enclosed proxy and all other costs of the Board of Directors solicitation of
proxies for the Special Meeting. Brokerage houses, banks and other nominees, fiduciaries, and
custodians nominally holding Katy shares as of the Record Date will be requested to forward proxy
soliciting material to the beneficial owners of such Katy shares, and we will reimburse them for
their reasonable expenses.
We estimate that the repurchase of fractional Katy shares in connection with the Reverse Stock
Split and payment of associated expenses will cost approximately $882,178 and will reduce the
number of record holders of the Companys shares from approximately 626 to approximately 107. We
expect that, as a result of the Reverse Stock Split and the cashing out of fractional shares held
by the Cashed Out Holders and Continuing Holders, our aggregate stockholders equity would change
from approximately $36.5 million as of December 31, 2007, to approximately $35.6 million. Book
value per share would change from $4.59 to $4.47, assuming the cash out of fractional shares had
occurred on December 31, 2007. If outstanding convertible preferred stock was converted into
common stock as of December 31, 2007, book value per share would change from $1.36 to $1.33. If
the Reverse Stock Split is completed, holders of fractional shares will receive cash in the amount
of $2.00 per share held immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split.
We intend to finance the Reverse Stock Split by using the Companys credit facility. It is not
expected that the payment with respect to the Reverse Stock Split or the associated expenses
described below will have a materially adverse effect on the Companys capital adequacy, liquidity,
results of operations or cash flow.
60
The following is an estimate of the expenses we expect to incur in connection with the Reverse
Stock Split and the solicitation of proxies for the Special Meeting. Final costs may be higher or
lower than the estimates shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPROXIMATE |
|
ITEM |
|
COST |
|
Legal fees |
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
VRC fees |
|
|
60,000 |
|
Accounting fees |
|
|
50,000 |
|
Proxy Solicitor |
|
|
25,000 |
|
Printing, mailing and other costs |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
VOTING SECURITIES
Market Price of Common Stock
On April 9, 2007, the Company announced that the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) intended to
suspend trading of the Companys shares of common stock due to noncompliance with the continuing
listing standards of the NYSE. The Company did not meet the required market capitalization level
of $75.0 million over a consecutive thirty day trading period or the required total stockholders
equity of not less than $75.0 million. The shares of Katy were suspended from trading on the NYSE
at the close of business on April 12, 2007. With the expectation that the NYSE would delist the
Companys shares, the Company pursued conducting the trading of its shares on another exchange or
quotation system. On April 16, 2007, the Company announced that the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB)
began reporting trades of its common stock effective immediately, under the ticker symbol KATY.
The following table sets forth high and low sales prices for the common stock in composite
transactions as reported on the NYSE composite tape through April 12, 2007 and subsequently on the
OTCBB composite tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(through September 19, 2008) |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
2.94 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
3.23 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
On September 19, 2008, the closing price of our common stock on the OTCBB composite tape was
$0.85.
Dividends
We did not pay cash dividends during 2008, 2007 or 2006 and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, our current credit facility prohibits the Company
from paying dividends on its securities, other than dividends paid solely in securities.
Stockholders
As of September 19, 2008 there were approximately 626 holders of record of our common stock.
Stock Purchases
On December 5, 2005, the Company announced the resumption of a plan to repurchase $1.0 million
in shares of its common stock. In 2005, 3,200 shares of common stock were repurchased on the open
market for $7,520. In 2006, 40,800 shares of common stock were repurchased on the open market for
$110,613. In 2007, 1,300 shares of common stock were repurchased on the open market for $3,388.
There have been no share repurchases in 2008.
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of |
|
Shares That |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
Range of |
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Announced |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Prices Paid |
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
per Share |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
or Programs |
|
Year Ended December
31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December
31, 2006 |
|
$ |
2.33 - $3.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
$ |
2.74 |
|
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
|
$ |
2.54 |
|
|
|
8,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December
31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2.58 - $2.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,300 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
|
45,300 |
|
|
$900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
PAST CONTRACTS, TRANSACTIONS, NEGOTIATIONS AND AGREEMENTS
During 2007, Katy paid Kohlberg & Co. $500,000 for ongoing management advisory services. Katy
expects to pay $500,000 per year for these services, as outlined in the Recapitalization Agreement
of June 2, 2001. Samuel P. Frieder and Christopher Lacovara are Co-Managing Partners of Kohlberg &
Co. Christopher W. Anderson and Shant Mardirossian are Partners of Kohlberg & Co. William F.
Andrews, Chairman of the Board of Directors, is a consultant, or Operating Principal, with
Kohlberg & Co.
There are no agreements between the Company or the Companys executive officers and directors
and any other person with respect to any shares of the Companys common stock, except as related to
shares covered by option grants under the terms of the Companys Amended and Restated Katy
Industries, Inc. 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan; Katy Industries, Inc. Non-Employee Director 1995
Stock Option Plan; Amended and Restated Katy Industries, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan; Katy
Industries, Inc. 2002 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan and Stand-Alone Stock Appreciation Rights
Agreement.
The Company is not aware of any arrangements that may result in a change in control of the
Company. Presently, the Company has no plans, proposals or negotiations that relate to or would
result in: (i) any purchase, sale or transfer of a material amount of the assets of the Company or
any of its subsidiaries; (ii) any material change in the policy, indebtedness or capitalization of
the Company (iii) any change in the present Board of Directors or the management of the Company,
including any plans or proposals to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing
vacancies on the board or to change any material term of the employment contract of any executive
officer; or (iv) any other material change in the Companys structure or business. There is always
the possibility, however, that we may enter into an arrangement or transaction that would result in
the change in control of the Company in the future, including but not limited to (A) entering into
a merger or acquisition transaction, (B) making a public or private offering of our shares, or (C)
entering into any other arrangement, agreement or transaction we may deem advisable. We will
disclose the terms of such a transaction at the appropriate time upon the advice of counsel.
64
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Summary Historical Financial Information
The following summary of consolidated financial information was derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and from
unaudited consolidated interim financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2007. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company, have been included. Results for the six months ended June
30, 2008 may not be indicative of results to be realized for the entire year. The summary historic
financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto, together with managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations, contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008. All amounts are in thousands except per share amounts.
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
86,825 |
|
|
$ |
95,524 |
|
|
$ |
187,771 |
|
|
$ |
192,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
6,294 |
|
|
$ |
12,236 |
|
|
$ |
20,254 |
|
|
$ |
25,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(8,527 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,553 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,881 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,649 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,971 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,501 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share of common stock Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.75 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
50,689 |
|
|
$ |
109,735 |
|
|
$ |
55,571 |
|
|
$ |
124,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
90,469 |
|
|
$ |
161,149 |
|
|
$ |
98,564 |
|
|
$ |
182,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
47,410 |
|
|
$ |
103,239 |
|
|
$ |
44,302 |
|
|
$ |
120,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities |
|
$ |
14,906 |
|
|
$ |
48,889 |
|
|
$ |
13,453 |
|
|
$ |
56,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
62,052 |
|
|
$ |
124,104 |
|
|
$ |
62,108 |
|
|
$ |
140,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
$ |
28,417 |
|
|
$ |
37,045 |
|
|
$ |
36,456 |
|
|
$ |
42,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of debt to capitalization |
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
56.9 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
57.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic and diluted |
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share per outstanding common stock |
|
$ |
3.57 |
|
|
$ |
4.66 |
|
|
$ |
4.59 |
|
|
$ |
5.28 |
|
Book value per share preferred stock converted* |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Companys outstanding shares of preferred stock are convertible into 18,859 shares of common
stock. |
66
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 and the
unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, show the pro forma effect of the Reverse Stock
Split. The historical amounts as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were derived from
the Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements that were included in the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. The historical amounts for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 were derived from the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements that were included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007.
The pro forma information below gives effect of the Reverse Stock Split based on shares
repurchased, non-recurring expenses incurred and the impact of additional borrowing to effect the
Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse Stock Split assumes that 241,089 shares are purchased at a price
of $2.00 per share. Pro forma adjustments to the pro forma consolidated balance sheet are computed
as if the Reverse Stock Split had occurred at June 30, 2008, while the pro forma consolidated
statements of operations are computed as if the Reverse Stock Split had occurred at the beginning
of the periods.
The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the Companys financial
position or results of operations actually would have been if the Reverse Stock Split had occurred
as of the dates presented, or of the Companys financial position or results of operations in the
future.
The unaudited pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with the historical
financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, which are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.
67
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2008
(Amounts in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katy |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
21,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,736 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
25,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,490 |
|
Receivable from disposition |
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
50,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,659 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
9,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
96,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,677 |
|
Less Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(74,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
32,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
90,469 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2008
(Amounts in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katy |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
15,739 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,739 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
3,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,185 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
21,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,509 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Revolving credit agreement |
|
|
5,477 |
|
|
|
882 |
(1) |
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
47,410 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
48,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
6,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
62,052 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
62,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15% Convertible Preferred Stock, $100 par value,
authorized 1,200,000 shares, issued and outstanding
1,131,551 shares, liquidation value $113,155 |
|
|
108,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,256 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,822 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
27,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,041 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(93,564 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) (1)(2) |
|
|
(93,964 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(21,894 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) (1) |
|
|
(22,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
28,417 |
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
27,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
90,469 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Katy |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
86,825 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
86,825 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
80,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
6,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,294 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) (6) |
|
|
14,611 |
|
Severance, restructuring and related charges |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(8,797 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(8,641 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) (3) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before benefit from
income taxes |
|
|
(9,684 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(9,552 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes from
continuing operations |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(8,527 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
(8,395 |
) |
Loss from operations of discontinued businesses (net of tax) |
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
Gain on sale of discontinued businesses (net of tax) |
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,649 |
) |
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
(7,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share of common stock Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(559.67 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(501.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
(7,936 |
) (4) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Katy |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
187,771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
187,771 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
167,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
20,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,254 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25,985 |
|
|
|
(564 |
) (7) |
|
|
25,421 |
|
Severance, restructuring and related charges |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(10,746 |
) |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
(10,182 |
) |
Equity in income of equity method investment |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,565 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) (5) |
|
|
(4,633 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before benefit from
income taxes |
|
|
(14,600 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(14,104 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes from continuing operations |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(13,881 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(13,385 |
) |
Income from operations of discontinued businesses (net of tax) |
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued businesses (net of tax) |
|
|
10,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,501 |
) |
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share of common stock Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(892.33 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(67.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
(7,936 |
) (4) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements (Amounts in Thousands, Except
Share and Per Share Data)
(1) Represents the impact on the June 30, 2008 historical balance sheet of cash borrowed under the
Companys credit facility to effect the Reverse Stock Split. The estimated cash payout is
approximately $482 for the shares subject to the Reverse Stock Split, and $400 for the
non-recurring costs and expenses associated with the Reverse Stock Split.
(2) Accumulated deficit is increased by $400 for the non-recurring costs and expenses as of June
30, 2008 related to the Reverse Stock Split, all of which represents transaction costs of the
Reverse Stock Split. Given the Companys tax position, no related tax effect is present.
(3) Increased interest costs of approximately $24 for the 6-month period ended June 30, 2008 at an
assumed interest rate of 5.38% on the estimated $882 of the Companys revolving line of credit used
to effect the Reverse Stock Split. A 1/4% change in the assumed rate would not result in a
material change in interest expense.
(4) Pro forma basic and diluted weighted outstanding shares are adjusted based on the assumed
redemption of 241,089 shares for cash as well as the impact of changing the Companys common stock
par value from $1 per common share to $500 per common share. After the Reverse Stock Split, the
Company will have 70,000 authorized shares, 19,644 issued shares, 15,420 outstanding shares, and
4,224 shares held in treasury.
(5) Increased interest costs of approximately $68 for the year ended December 31, 2007 at an
assumed interest rate of 7.75% on the estimated $882 of the Companys revolving line of credit used
to effect the Reverse Stock Split. A 1/4% change in the assumed rate would not result in a
material change in interest expense.
(6) Reflects the cost savings estimated to be realized as a result of no longer being a public
company of approximately $156 expensed through June 30, 2008. These costs include accounting,
legal, filing, printing, and other expenses and are based on historical costs.
(7) Reflects the cost savings estimated to be realized as a result of no longer being a public
company of approximately $564 expensed through December 31, 2007. These costs include accounting,
legal, filing, printing, and other expenses and are based on historical costs.
72
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Reverse Stock Split will constitute a going-private transaction for purposes of Rule
13e-3 of the Exchange Act. As a result, Katy has filed the Schedule 13E-3 which contains additional
information about Katy. Copies of the Schedule 13E-3 are available for inspection and copying at
Katys principal executive offices during regular business hours by any interested stockholder of
Katy, or a representative who has been so designated in writing, and may be inspected and copied,
or obtained by mail, by written request addressed to KATY INDUSTRIES, INC., 305 Rock Industrial
Park Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044.
Katy is currently subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and files
periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC relating to its business,
financial and other matters. Copies of such reports, proxy statements and other information, as
well as the Schedule 13E-3, may be copied (at prescribed rates) at the public reference facilities
maintained by the SEC. For further information concerning the SECs public reference rooms, you may
call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of this information may also be accessed on the World Wide Web
through the SECs internet address at www.sec.gov. We have not made any provision in connection
with the Reverse Stock Split and the information contained in this Proxy Statement to grant
unaffiliated stockholders access to our corporate records.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
In our filings with the SEC, information is sometimes incorporated by reference. This means
that we are referring you to information that we have filed separately with the SEC. The
information incorporated by reference should be considered part of this Proxy Statement, except for
any information superseded by information contained directly in this Proxy Statement or in any
other subsequently filed document.
Pursuant to the Exchange Act, we currently file annual and quarterly reports with the SEC. Our
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed pursuant to Section
13 of the Exchange Act, includes financial statements and schedules. Our most recent quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended June 30, 2008, filed pursuant to Section 13 of
the Exchange Act, also includes financial statements and schedules. The Companys Form 10-K/A was
filed with the SEC on June 16, 2008, its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was filed
with the SEC on August 4, 2008, and its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 was filed
with the SEC on May 13, 2008. We undertake to deliver promptly, without charge, upon the written or
oral request of any stockholder, a separate copy of our annual report on Form 10-K/A or a quarterly
report on Form 10-Q. Requests should be submitted to Philip Reinkemeyer, 305 Rock Industrial Park
Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044.
This Proxy Statement incorporates by reference the following documents that we have previously
filed with the SEC. They contain important information about Katy and its financial condition.
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
73
|
|
|
Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed March 28, 2008,
April 7, 2008, August 1, 2008 and September 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Our Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed
April 29, 2008. |
We also incorporate by reference any additional documents that we may file with the Commission
under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act between the date of this Proxy
Statement and the date of the Special Meeting.
We will provide, without charge, upon the written or oral request of any person to whom this
Proxy Statement is delivered, by first class mail or other equally prompt means within one business
day of receipt of such request, a copy of any and all information that has been incorporated by
reference, without exhibits unless such exhibits are also incorporated by reference in this Proxy
Statement. You may obtain a copy of these documents and any amendments thereto by written request
addressed to KATY INDUSTRIES, INC., 305 Rock Industrial Park Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044.
These documents are also included in our SEC filings, which you can access electronically at the
SEC website located at http://www.sec.gov.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors is not aware of any business to come before the Meeting other than the
matters described above in this Proxy Statement. If, however, any other matters should properly
come before the Meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will act in accordance with
their best judgment.
The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. The Company will reimburse
brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by
them in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the Common Stock. In addition to
solicitation by mail, directors and officers of the Company may solicit proxies personally, by fax
or telephone, without additional compensation.
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make any representation about the
transaction or us that differs from, or adds to, the information in this proxy statement or in our
documents that are publicly filed with the SEC. If anyone does give you different or additional
information, you should not rely on it.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WILLIAM ANDREWS
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Bridgeton, Missouri
, 2008
74
EXHIBIT A
FAIRNESS OPINION
September 19, 2008
The Board of Directors of
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
305 Rock Industrial Park Drive
Bridgeton, MO 63044
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Valuation Research Corporation (VRC) understands that the Board of Directors (the Board) of
Katy Industries, Inc. (Katy or the Company) is considering a transaction (the Transaction)
that is tentatively expected to be voted on by the Board on or about September 25, 2008. The
Transaction involves Katy (i) declaring a 500 for 1 reverse stock split of its common stock, par
value $1.00 per share, and (ii) repurchasing fractional shares of Company common stock resulting
from the stock split for $2.00 per share on a pre-split basis (the Purchase Price). As a result
of the Transaction, the Company expects to be removed from quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.
In connection with the Transaction, you have requested VRC to render an opinion (the Opinion) as
to whether the Purchase Price to be paid is fair from a financial point of view to the Companys
common stockholders.
In rendering the Opinion, VRC conducted such reviews, analyses and inquiries we deemed appropriate
under the circumstances. Among other things, VRC:
|
§ |
|
Reviewed publicly available information concerning Katy, including its Forms 10-K for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 through 2007 and its Forms 10-Q for the first and
second quarters of fiscal years 2007 and 2008; |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed various internal monthly financial statement reports of Katy since December
2007 including the most recent report for July 2008; |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed Katys financial projections for fiscal years 2008 through 2012 (Katys
Forecast) and the material assumptions associated therewith for each of the Best Case
Plan, the Most Likely Case Plan and the Stable Plan (as such plans have been labeled in the
materials provided to VRC); |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed the confidential information memorandum for Continental Commercial Products
dated June 2007; |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed the restated certificate of incorporation of the Company which was filed with
the SEC on July 13, 2001; |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed the industry in which Katy operates, which included a review of (i) certain
publicly traded companies deemed comparable to Katy and (ii) certain mergers and
acquisitions involving businesses deemed comparable to Katys; |
|
|
§ |
|
Had discussions with certain members of Katys management team with respect to the
past, present, and future operating and financial conditions of Katy, among other subjects; |
|
|
§ |
|
Performed discounted cash flow analyses based on Katys Forecast; |
Valuation
Research Corporation 200 Princeton South
Corporate Center Suite 200, Ewing, NJ
08628 Phone
609.243.7000 valuationsearch.com
75
|
§ |
|
Reviewed historical stock prices for Katy; |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed the internally prepared monthly orders, broken down by each division, of Katy
for fiscal year 2007; |
|
|
§ |
|
Reviewed publicly available information regarding the financial terms of certain
transactions that are comparable, in whole or in part, to the Transaction; |
|
|
§ |
|
Developed indications of value for Katy using generally accepted valuation methodology;
and |
|
|
§ |
|
Conducted such other reviews, analyses and inquiries and considered such other economic,
industry, market, financial and other information and data deemed appropriate by VRC. |
We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of
all data, material and other information furnished, or otherwise made available, to us, discussed
with or reviewed by us, or publicly available, and do not assume any responsibility with respect to
the accuracy or completeness of such data, material and other information. In addition, management
of Katy have advised us, and we have assumed, that the financial forecasts and projections have
been reasonably and prudently prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments of management as to the future financial results and conditions of the Company, and
we express no opinion with respect to such forecasts and projections or the assumptions on which
they are based.
We have not been requested to make, and have not made, any independent evaluation of the Companys
solvency or creditworthiness, any physical inspection or independent appraisal or evaluation of any
of the assets, properties or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or any other
party, nor were we provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. We express no opinion regarding
the liquidation value of any entity. Furthermore, we have undertaken no independent analysis of any
potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent
liabilities, to which the Company is or may be a party or is or may be subject, or of any
governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to
which the Company is or may be a party or is or may be subject.
We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that there has been no material
change in the assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, business or
prospects of the Company since the date of the most recent financial statements provided to us, and
that there are no facts or other information that would make any of the information reviewed by us
incomplete or misleading. We have further assumed that there will be no subsequent events that
could materially affect the conclusions set forth in the Opinion. Such subsequent events include,
without limitation, adverse changes in industry or market conditions; changes to the business,
financial condition and results of operations of the Company; changes in the terms of the
Transaction; and the failure to consummate the Transaction within a reasonable period of time.
We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the Transaction will be
consummated on the same terms as described by management, (b) all conditions to the consummation of
the Transaction will be satisfied within a reasonable period of time without waiver thereof, and
(c)
Valuation
Research Corporation 200 Princeton South
Corporate Center Suite 200, Ewing, NJ
08628 Phone
609.243.7000 valuationsearch.com
76
the Transaction will be consummated in a timely manner in accordance with the terms described to
us, without any amendments or modifications thereto or any adjustment to the Purchase Price.
The Opinion is necessarily based on economic, financial, industry, market and other conditions as
in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. Except as set forth
in our engagement letter, we have not undertaken, and are under no obligation, to update, revise,
reaffirm or withdraw the Opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring after the
date hereof. The Opinion will be solely for the Companys Board of Directors and the stockholders
of the Company. We have not been requested to opine in the Opinion as to, and the Opinion does not
address, (i) the underlying business decision of the Companys management, the Company, its
security holders or any other party to proceed with or effect the Transaction, (ii) the fairness of
any portion or aspect of the Transaction not expressly addressed in the Opinion, (iii) the fairness
of any portion or aspect of the Transaction to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or
other constituencies of the Company or any other party other than those set forth in the Opinion,
(iv) the relative merits of the Transaction as compared to any alternative business strategies that
might exist for the Company or any other party or the effect of any other Transactions in which the
Company, or any other party might engage, (v) the legal, tax or financial reporting consequences of
the Transaction to either the Company, its respective security holders, or any other party, or (vi)
the solvency or fair value of the Company or any other participant in the Transaction under any
applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters.
In addition, we express no opinion or recommendation as to how any shareholder or member of the
Board should vote or act in connection with the Transaction.
We have not been involved in the structuring, documentation or negotiation of the Transaction and
have not, other than through the delivery of the Opinion and our review and analysis undertaken in
connection therewith as described herein, provided any financial advisory or investment banking
services to the Company related to or associated with the Transaction.
Our opinion does not include any considerations concerning strategic, operating and financial
synergies that may result from the Transaction.
VRCs fees and expenses for the work associated with this Opinion are not contingent on the
consummation of the Transaction or any matters related to or associated therewith.
During the last two years, VRC has worked with Katy on one prior engagement and the fees on that
engagement amounted to $15,000.
We have provided, currently are providing and in the future may provide valuation advisory services
to affiliates of Kohlberg & Company and have received and in the future may receive fees for the
rendering of these services.
VRCs fairness opinion committee has reviewed and approved this opinion and various supporting
analysis.
Valuation
Research Corporation 200 Princeton South
Corporate Center Suite 200, Ewing, NJ
08628 Phone
609.243.7000 valuationsearch.com
77
VRCs Opinion does not express an opinion about the fairness or the amount or nature of the
compensation to any of the Companys officers, directors or employees or class of such employees.
All references to this Opinion, its supporting work papers or this engagement should be identified
by engagement number 50005483.
In its normal course of business, we are regularly engaged to provide financial opinions with
respect to valuation and fairness in connection with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, leveraged
buyouts, recapitalizations and financings.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, including the various assumptions and limitations set
forth herein, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Purchase Price is fair from a
financial point of view to the Companys common stockholders.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Valuation Research Corporation
VALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION
Valuation
Research Corporation 200 Princeton South
Corporate Center Suite 200, Ewing, NJ
08628 Phone
609.243.7000 valuationsearch.com
78
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED FORM OF AMENDMENT TO
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO EFFECT REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
That the first paragraph of Article Fourth of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation is
hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
The aggregate number of shares of all classes of stock which the corporation shall have the
authority to issue is 1,270,000 shares, divided into two classes, one class consisting of one
million two hundred thousand (1,200,000) shares of Preferred Stock of the par value of one hundred
dollars ($100.00) per share, and the other class consisting of seventy thousand (70,000) shares
of Common Stock of the par value of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per share.
FOURTH: That the Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby further amended by adding the
following provision at the end of Article Fourth:
11. Stock Split. As of [ ] (Eastern Time) on [ ] (the Effective Time),
each issued and outstanding share of the Corporations Common Stock (including each share of
treasury stock, the Pre-Split Common Stock) shall automatically and without any action on the
part of the holder thereof be reclassified as and reduced to 1/500th of a share of Common Stock
(such reduction of shares designated as the Reverse Stock Split). The par value of the
Corporations Common Stock following the Reverse Stock Split shall be $500.00 per share. No
fractional shares will be issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Each holder of
Pre-Split Common Stock at the Effective Time who would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share
shall, in lieu thereof, receive a cash payment equal to the fractional share multiplied by $2.00.
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
PLEASE MARK VOTES
AS IN THIS EXAMPLE |
|
REVOCABLE PROXY
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The amendment of
Katys Certificate
of Incorporation to
effect a 1-for-500
reverse stock split
of Katys common
shares.
|
|
For
o
|
|
Against
o
|
|
Abstain
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned hereby appoints David J. Feldman and [ ],
and each of them, with full powers of substitution, to act as
attorneys and proxies for the undersigned to vote all shares of
capital stock of Katy Industries, Inc. (Katy or the Company) which
the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of
Stockholders (the Meeting) to be held at the Holiday Inn Mount
Kisco, Mount Kisco, New York, on _____, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. local
time, and at any and all adjournments and postponements thereof. |
|
In its discretion, the Board of Directors, as proxy for the
undersigned, is authorized to vote on any other business that may
properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the
amendment to Katys Certificate of Incorporation to effect the
Reverse Stock Split. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please be sure to sign and date
this Proxy in the box below. |
|
Date |
|
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, BUT IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE
SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDMENT TO KATYS CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO EFFECT THE
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT. IF ANY OTHER BUSINESS IS PRESENTED AT THE
MEETING, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY A MAJORITY OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN THEIR BEST JUDGMENT. AT THE PRESENT TIME, THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS KNOWS OF NO OTHER BUSINESS TO BE PRESENTED AT
THE MEETING. |
Stockholder sign above |
Co-holder (if any) sign
above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5Detach above card, sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
This Proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted by: (i) filing with the Secretary of the Company at or before the Meeting a
written notice of revocation bearing a later date than this Proxy; (ii) duly executing a subsequent proxy relating to the same shares
and delivering it to the Secretary of the Company at or before the Meeting; or (iii) attending the Meeting and voting in person
(although attendance at the Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of this Proxy). If this Proxy is properly revoked as
described above, then the power of such attorneys and proxies shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect.
The above signed acknowledges receipt from the Company, prior to the execution of this proxy, of Notice of the Special Meeting and a
Proxy Statement.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on this card. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian,
please give your full title. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.
PLEASE PROMPTLY COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE |
80