e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-12867
3COM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2605794 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
350 Campus Drive |
|
|
Marlborough, Massachusetts
|
|
01752 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (508) 323-1000
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of December 28, 2007, 402,207,736 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
3COM CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31, with each fiscal quarter
ending on the Friday generally nearest August 31, November 30 and February 28. For presentation
purposes, the periods are shown as ending on August 31, November 30, February 28 and May 31, as
applicable. H3C follows a calendar year basis of reporting and therefore results are consolidated
on a two-month time lag.
3Com, the 3Com logo, Digital Vaccine, NBX, TippingPoint Technologies, and TippingPoint are
registered trademarks and VCX is a trademark of 3Com Corporation or its subsidiaries. H3C is a
trademark of H3C Technologies Co., Limited. Other product and brand names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective owners.
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, predictions regarding the following aspects of our future:
future growth; future growth of H3C, including strategy, growth, management of growth, dependence,
expected benefits, method of consolidation, PRC tax rate and dividend tax, sales from China,
adjustments to preliminary purchase price allocation for 49 percent acquisition, and resources
needed to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley and manage operations; impact of SFAS No. 123(R) and other
accounting regulations; expected annual amortization expense; TippingPoint IPO; environment for
enterprise networking equipment; challenges relating to sales growth; supply of components; trend
towards Gigabit products; research and development focus; characteristics of IPS and certain H3C
products; future sales of connectivity products; re-assessment, development and execution of our
go-to-market strategy; strategic product and technology development plans; management of DVBU and
Corporate segments to reach sustained profitability; goal of profitability; dependence on China;
ability to satisfy cash requirements for at least the next twelve months; restructuring activities
and expected charges to be incurred; potential additional restructuring and cost reduction
activities; expected sale of land; expected cost savings from restructuring activities and
integration; potential acquisitions and strategic relationships including matters relating to our
announced proposed acquisition by an entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners;
future contractual obligations; recovery of deferred tax assets;
adjustments to tax benefits; reserves; market risk;
outsourcing; competition and pricing pressures; and effect of litigation; and you can identify
these and other forward-looking statements by the use of words such as may, can, should,
expects, plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates, predicts, intends, continue, or
the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology. Forward-
looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any forward-looking
statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors, including those set forth under Part II Item 1A Risk Factors. All
forward-looking statements included in this document are based on our assessment of information
available to us at the time this report is filed. We have no intent, and disclaim any obligation,
to update any forward-looking statements.
In this Form 10-Q we refer to the Peoples Republic of China as China or the PRC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
$ |
332,976 |
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
|
$ |
633,120 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
165,681 |
|
|
|
182,825 |
|
|
|
336,179 |
|
|
|
346,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
152,120 |
|
|
|
150,151 |
|
|
|
301,056 |
|
|
|
286,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
80,785 |
|
|
|
76,188 |
|
|
|
155,189 |
|
|
|
153,310 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
52,199 |
|
|
|
48,151 |
|
|
|
104,509 |
|
|
|
95,944 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
31,060 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
52,538 |
|
|
|
42,617 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
26,260 |
|
|
|
12,221 |
|
|
|
52,266 |
|
|
|
24,402 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
193,451 |
|
|
|
159,531 |
|
|
|
368,074 |
|
|
|
316,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(41,331 |
) |
|
|
(9,380 |
) |
|
|
(67,018 |
) |
|
|
(30,248 |
) |
Gain (loss) on investments, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
Interest (expense) income, net |
|
|
(3,966 |
) |
|
|
11,447 |
|
|
|
(7,533 |
) |
|
|
21,537 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
10,342 |
|
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
22,426 |
|
|
|
17,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(34,954 |
) |
|
|
13,772 |
|
|
|
(51,797 |
) |
|
|
10,004 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(35,624 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,516 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,278 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
398,989 |
|
|
|
393,352 |
|
|
|
398,015 |
|
|
|
392,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
419,143 |
|
|
$ |
559,217 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
70,996 |
|
|
|
77,368 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance
for doubtful accounts of $16,124 and
$15,292 respectively |
|
|
127,550 |
|
|
|
102,952 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
93,788 |
|
|
|
107,988 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
54,227 |
|
|
|
50,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
765,704 |
|
|
|
897,682 |
|
Property and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $197,936
and $234,554 respectively |
|
|
63,919 |
|
|
|
76,460 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
767,274 |
|
|
|
766,444 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
322,678 |
|
|
|
371,289 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
26,747 |
|
|
|
39,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,946,322 |
|
|
$ |
2,151,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
103,115 |
|
|
$ |
110,430 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
366,873 |
|
|
|
435,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
517,988 |
|
|
|
640,068 |
|
Deferred taxes and long-term obligations |
|
|
14,865 |
|
|
|
23,725 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
336,000 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
10,000 shares authorized; none
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value,
990,000 shares authorized; shares
issued: 402,205 and 399,064
respectively |
|
|
2,337,557 |
|
|
|
2,323,356 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(1,230,686 |
) |
|
|
(1,176,406 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
18,598 |
|
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,125,469 |
|
|
|
1,151,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,946,322 |
|
|
$ |
2,151,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(54,278 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,584 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
69,279 |
|
|
|
39,789 |
|
Stock-based compensation charges |
|
|
9,868 |
|
|
|
10,237 |
|
Loss (gain) on property and equipment disposals |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(10,920 |
) |
Gain on investments, net |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,915 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
(5,907 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(10,418 |
) |
|
|
(53,149 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
16,863 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
19,925 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(14,642 |
) |
|
|
(30,897 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(68,080 |
) |
|
|
18,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(52,559 |
) |
|
|
(5,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224,999 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and sales of investments |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
269,932 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,746 |
) |
|
|
(16,118 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
33,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(8,440 |
) |
|
|
61,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
5,656 |
|
|
|
12,635 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
(4,708 |
) |
Repayment of long term debt |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid to minority interest shareholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,785 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(89,666 |
) |
|
|
(32,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
10,591 |
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents during period |
|
|
(140,074 |
) |
|
|
28,083 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
559,217 |
|
|
|
501,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
419,143 |
|
|
$ |
529,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
3COM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position as of November 30, 2007 and June 1, 2007, our results of
operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 and December 1, 2006 and our cash
flows for the six months ended November 30, 2007 and December 1, 2006.
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31. For convenience, the
condensed consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the
calendar month. Accordingly, the three months shown as ended November 30, 2007 actually ended on
November 30, 2007, the three months shown as ended November 30, 2006 actually ended on December 1,
2006, and the year shown as ended May 31, 2007 actually ended on June 1, 2007. The results of
operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 may not be indicative of the
results to be expected for the fiscal year ending May 30, 2008 or any other future periods. These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended June 1, 2007.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). The interpretation requires companies to
recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is more likely than
not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized would be the amount
that represents the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
ultimately realized. A liability would be recognized for any benefit claimed, or expected to be
claimed, in a tax return in excess of the benefit recorded in the financial statements, along with
any interest and penalty on the excess. FIN 48 requires, among other items, a tabular
reconciliation of the change during the reporting period, in the aggregate unrecognized tax
benefits claimed or expected to be claimed in tax returns and disclosure relating to accrued
interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits. Additional disclosure will also be required
for those uncertain tax positions where it is reasonably possible that the estimate of the tax
benefit will change significantly in the next twelve months. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted FIN 48 as of June 2, 2007. See Note 5
Income Taxes.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be
based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level
within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by 3Com in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We
have not yet determined the impact, if any, that the implementation of SFAS No. 157 will have on
our results of operations or financial condition.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
108 Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements, which expresses the staffs views regarding the process of quantifying
financial statement misstatements. The Bulletin is effective at our fiscal year end 2008. The
Company currently believes the adoption will have no impact on our
results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
4
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require
assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use fair
value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities,
equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. Other eligible items
include firm commitments for financial instruments that otherwise would not be recognized at
inception and non-cash warranty obligations where a warrantor is permitted to pay a third party to
provide the warranty goods or services. If the use of fair value is elected, any upfront costs and
fees related to the item must be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue
costs. The fair value election is irrevocable and generally made on an instrument-by-instrument
basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to measure based on fair value.
At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair value has been
elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Subsequent to the
adoption of SFAS 159, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by 3Com in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009. 3Com currently is determining whether fair value accounting is appropriate
for any of its eligible items and cannot estimate the impact, if any, which SFAS 159 will have on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-3, Accounting for NonRefundable Advance Payments for Goods
or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3
requires that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered
for future research and development activities be deferred and capitalized and recognized as an
expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed. EITF 07-3 is effective,
on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and will be adopted in
the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the
pending adoption of EITF 07-3 on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In order to determine the fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares, we
use the Black-Scholes option pricing model and apply the single-option valuation approach to the
stock option valuation. In order to determine the fair value of restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units we use the closing market price of 3Com common stock on the date of grant.
We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period of the awards for options granted following the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) for time vested
awards. We recognize compensation expense for performance based restricted stock in the fiscal
quarter when an event makes it probable that performance will more than likely be achieved. For
unvested stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2006, we will continue to recognize stock-based
compensation expense using the accelerated amortization method prescribed in FASB Interpretation
No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans.
As of November 30, 2007, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense relating to unvested
employee stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan, adjusted for estimated
forfeitures, was $38.6 million. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 2.5 years. If actual forfeitures differ from current estimates, total unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.
Stock-based compensation recognized in the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 as a result
of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) as well as pro forma disclosures according to the original
provisions of SFAS No. 123 for periods prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) use the
Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the fair value of options granted under the
companys equity incentive plans. The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions,
including the expected stock price volatility. The underlying weighted-average assumptions used in
the Black-Scholes model and the resulting estimates of fair value per share were as follows for
options granted during the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 and 2006:
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Employee stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
40.5 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value per option |
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
49.2 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value per option |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
The following table presents stock-based compensation expenses included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended November |
|
Ended November |
|
Ended November |
|
Ended November |
|
|
30, 2007 |
|
30, 2006 |
|
30, 2007 |
|
30, 2006 |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense before tax |
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
6,950 |
|
|
$ |
9,868 |
|
|
$ |
10,237 |
|
|
|
|
As of November 30, 2007, our outstanding stock options as a percentage of outstanding shares were
approximately 12 percent. Stock option detail as of November 30, 2007, was as follows (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
price |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2007 |
|
|
52,280 |
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,649 |
) |
|
|
2.03 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(3,914 |
) |
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding November 30, 2007 |
|
|
48,172 |
|
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
25,943 |
|
|
$ |
5.86 |
|
Weighted
average grant-date fair value of options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
During the six months ended November 30, 2007 approximately 1.6 million options were exercised at
an aggregate intrinsic value of $4.4 million. The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference
between the market value as of November 30, 2007 and the exercise price of the options. The
closing market value as of November 30, 2007 was $4.31 per share as reported by the NASDAQ Global
Select Market. The aggregate intrinsic value of in-the-money options outstanding and options
exercisable as of November 30, 2007 was $12.3 million and $8.4 million, respectively.
Options outstanding that are vested and expected to vest as of November 30, 2007 are as follows:
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Life (in years) |
|
(in thousands) |
Vested and expected
to vest at November
30, 2007 |
|
|
37,733 |
|
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
10,845 |
|
Restricted stock award activity during the six months ended November 30, 2007 and restricted stock
award detail as of November 30, 2007, were as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
$ |
4.33 |
|
Granted |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
4.37 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding November 30, 2007 |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
$ |
4.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended November 30, 2007 approximately 0.6 million restricted shares with an
aggregate fair value of $2.4 million became vested.
Restricted stock unit activity during the six months ended November 30, 2007 and restricted stock
units outstanding as of November 30, 2007, were as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(unvested) |
Outstanding May 31, 2007 |
|
|
3,111 |
|
Granted |
|
|
4,427 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(632 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding November 30, 2007 |
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units at November 30, 2007 was $28.2 million
with a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 2.2 years.
During the six months ended November 30, 2007 approximately 0.6 million restricted share units with
an aggregate fair value of $2.2 million became vested.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We have an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) under which eligible
employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to ten percent of their compensation, as defined,
to purchase common stock at a price of 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value as of the
beginning or the end of the six-month offering period. We recognized $0.8 million of stock-based
compensation expense related to the ESPP in the six months ended November 30, 2007.
7
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS
On November 17, 2003, we formed H3C, formerly known as the Huawei-3Com joint venture, with a
subsidiary of Huawei Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei). H3C is domiciled in Hong Kong, and has its
principal operating center in Hangzhou, China. Two years after formation of H3C, we had the
one-time option to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest from Huawei. We exercised
this right and entered into an agreement to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest
in H3C from Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million. The acquisition occurred on
January 27, 2006 at which time we owned a majority interest in the joint venture and, therefore,
consolidated H3Cs financial statements (beginning February 1, 2006). Three years after formation
of H3C, we and Huawei each had the right to initiate a bid process to purchase the equity interest
in H3C held by the other. 3Com initiated the bidding process on November 15, 2006 to buy Huaweis
49 percent stake in H3C. Huawei ultimately accepted our bid and the transaction closed on March 29,
2007, at which time 3Com paid the $882 million purchase price in full. As such, H3C is a wholly
owned subsidiary in the six months ended November 30, 2007 as compared to the same period of the
previous year when we owned 51 percent and Huawei had a minority ownership.
NOTE 4. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure.
In fiscal 2001, we began a broad restructuring of our business to enhance the focus and cost
effectiveness of our businesses in serving their respective markets. These restructuring efforts
continued through fiscal 2008. As of November 30, 2007, accrued liabilities related to actions
initiated in fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 (the Fiscal 2001 Actions,
Fiscal 2002 Actions, Fiscal 2003 Actions, Fiscal 2004 Actions, Fiscal 2005 Actions, Fiscal
2006 Actions, Fiscal 2007 Actions, and Fiscal 2008 Actions) mainly consist of lease
obligations associated with vacated facilities and employee separation costs.
Restructuring charges related to these various initiatives resulted in a charge of $3.1 million in
the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and a net charge of $0.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2007. Net restructuring charges in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 consisted of $2.4 million for
severance and outplacement costs and $0.7 million for facilities-related charges. Included in the
$2.4 million of severance and outplacement costs was a
$1.0 million charge related to the termination of the unvested
stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, of
terminated employees, who were let go as part of the
Fiscal 2008 Actions. The severance agreements contain a provision for
the payout of the intrinsic value of the share-based awards
pending the closing of a proposed acquisition by affiliates of
Bain Capital Partners. The net
restructuring charge in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 resulted from severance, outplacement and
other costs of $2.8 million, offset by $2.2 million in benefit resulting from changes in estimates
on previously established restructuring provisions. Restructuring charges for the first six months
of fiscal 2008 were $3.6 million, and net restructuring charges for the first six months of fiscal
2007 were $0.5 million.
Accrued liabilities associated with restructuring charges totaled $3.9 million as of November 30,
2007 and are included in the caption Accrued liabilities and other in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. These liabilities are classified as current because we expect to
satisfy such liabilities in cash within the next 12 months.
Fiscal 2008 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2008 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation Expense |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of November 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Employee separation expenses include severance pay,
outplacement services, medical and other related benefits. During the six months ended November 30, 2007, the
total reduction in workforce associated with actions initiated during fiscal 2008 included
approximately 49 employees who had been separated or were currently in the separation process and
approximately 16 additional employees who had been notified but had not yet worked their last day.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to actions initiated in fiscal 2008 during
fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2007 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2007 restructuring actions are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (benefits) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of November 30,
2007 |
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expenses include severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. The reduction in workforce affected employees involved in research and
development, sales and marketing, customer support, and general and administrative functions. In
the six months ended November 30, 2007, the total reduction in workforce associated with actions
initiated during fiscal 2007 included approximately four employees who had been separated or were
currently in the separation process and approximately one additional employee who had been notified
but had not yet worked his or her last day.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to actions initiated in fiscal 2007
during fiscal 2008.
Fiscal 2001 through 2006 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2001 through 2006 restructuring actions are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
related Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
1,479 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (benefits) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of November 30,
2007 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
related provisions in the quarter were related to revised lease
obligation terms, for estimated sublease income.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to these actions during fiscal 2008.
9
NOTE 5. INCOME TAXES
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), that clarifies the accounting and recognition for income tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in our tax returns. FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on June 2, 2007 which
resulted in no adjustment to the beginning of the year retained earnings balance. As of the
adoption date, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $24.8 million and valuation allowances
of $937.1 million, for a total of $961.9 million in unrecognized tax benefits. The valuation
allowance of $937.1 million includes $143.5 million attributable to the tax benefit of stock option
deductions, which, if recognized, will be allocated directly to paid-in-capital. In addition, the
valuation allowance includes approximately $59.3 million for acquired net operating loss
carryforwards which, if realized, would result in a decrease in goodwill. The remaining tax
benefits, if recognized would affect our effective tax rate. As of the end of the second quarter
of fiscal 2008 the balance of unrecognized tax benefits excluding the valuation allowance was $27.4
million, representing an increase over the fiscal year to date of $2.6 million. All of this
increase, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. The amount of the increase in the second quarter was $1.3 million. Substantially all
of these increases relate to tax positions taken in the current fiscal period. Since adoption there
has been no material reduction in the amount of unrecognized benefits as a result of the expiry of
applicable statutes.
The Company files a consolidated U.S. income tax return and tax returns in various state and local
jurisdictions, and our subsidiaries file tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. In the
normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout
the world, including such major jurisdictions as China, the United Kingdom and Singapore, as well
as the U.S. With some exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and
local, or non-U.S., income tax examinations for years before 2004.
The significant exceptions are as follows. In Singapore we are subject to examination in relation
to transfer pricing and other issues for fiscal years 1999 to 2004. In the Netherlands we are
under examination for fiscal year 1997 in relation to the taxable status of income from an interest
in a foreign partnership. In Hong Kong we are under examination for fiscal years 2000 to 2002 in
relation to an offshore claim in respect of income from our Asia Pacific Region customer service
business. It is possible that these examinations will be settled within the next twelve months
and therefore it is reasonably possible that, as a result of settlement, there could be a material
change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits. However it is not possible to estimate the
amount of the potential change.
We estimate that the balance of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $0.8
million over the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of various statutes.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. As of June 2, 2007, the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions was $2.1 million and zero, respectively, which has been recorded within the
balance of unrecognized tax benefits. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008 the
balance of interest and penalties included in unrecognized tax benefits was $2.5 million,
representing an increase over the fiscal year to date of $0.4 million. The amount of the increase
in tax expense related to interest and penalties in the second quarter was $0.2 million.
NOTE 6. COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
The components of comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(35,624 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,516 |
) |
|
$ |
(54,278 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,584 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
2,004 |
|
Change in accumulated translation
adjustments |
|
|
7,622 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
|
|
14,250 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(28,002 |
) |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
(40,238 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NOTE 7. NET LOSS PER SHARE
Employee stock options of 48.2 million, restricted stock awards of 2.3 million and restricted stock
units of 6.5 million shares for both the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 and stock
options of 64.2 million, restricted stock awards of 3.1 million and restricted stock units of 3.5
million shares for both the three and six months ended November 30, 2006 were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share as the net loss for these periods would have made their
effect antidilutive.
NOTE 8. INVENTORIES
The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
58,495 |
|
|
$ |
61,857 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
28,705 |
|
|
|
38,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,788 |
|
|
$ |
107,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
The following table details our purchased intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2007 |
|
|
May 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Existing technology |
|
$ |
374,384 |
|
|
$ |
(165,883 |
) |
|
$ |
208,501 |
|
|
$ |
387,233 |
|
|
$ |
(148,641 |
) |
|
$ |
238,592 |
|
Trademark |
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
55,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,500 |
|
Huawei non-compete
agreement |
|
|
33,370 |
|
|
|
(11,066 |
) |
|
|
22,304 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
32,939 |
|
OEM agreement |
|
|
24,140 |
|
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
|
|
20,155 |
|
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
23,778 |
|
Maintenance contracts |
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(8,972 |
) |
|
|
10,028 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
|
|
11,611 |
|
Other |
|
|
22,008 |
|
|
|
(15,820 |
) |
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
(13,055 |
) |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
528,404 |
|
|
$ |
(205,726 |
) |
|
$ |
322,678 |
|
|
$ |
540,457 |
|
|
$ |
(169,168 |
) |
|
$ |
371,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008 we wrote off a $15.6 million fully amortized existing
technology intangible asset related to our connectivity business.
Since the products associated with the connectivity
business are near the end of the product life cycle, we have concluded that the asset does not provide any future benefit. Additionally, in
the first six months of fiscal 2008 our gross intangible assets increased by $3.5 million for the
appreciation on the Renminbi affecting the value of certain intangible assets tied to our Chinese
business. These intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life
of approximately four years.
NOTE 10. ACCRUED WARRANTY
Most products are sold with varying lengths of warranty ranging from 90 days to limited lifetime.
Allowances for estimated warranty obligations are recorded in the period of sale, based on
historical experience related to product failure rates and actual warranty costs incurred during
the applicable warranty period and are recorded as part of cost of goods sold. Also, on an ongoing
basis, we assess the adequacy of our allowances related to warranty obligations recorded in
previous periods and may adjust the balances to reflect actual experience or changes in future
expectations.
11
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for estimated warranty costs for the
six months ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accrued warranty, beginning of period |
|
$ |
40,596 |
|
|
$ |
41,791 |
|
Cost of warranty claims processed during the period |
|
|
(21,377 |
) |
|
|
(26,481 |
) |
Provision for warranties related to products sold during the period |
|
|
20,699 |
|
|
|
23,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty, end of period |
|
$ |
39,918 |
|
|
$ |
38,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11. LONG-TERM DEBT
On March 22, 2007, H3C Holdings Limited (the Borrower), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
3Com Corporation, entered into the Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of March 22, 2007 among
H3C Holdings Limited, as Borrower, 3Com Corporation, 3Com Holdings Limited and 3Com Technologies,
as Holdco Guarantors, various Lenders, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Mandated Lead
Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent (GSCP), and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). On March 28,
2007, the Borrower borrowed $430 million under the Credit Agreement in the form of a senior secured
term loan to finance a portion of the purchase price for 3Coms acquisition of 49 percent of H3C
Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C.
On May 25, 2007, the parties amended and restated the Credit Agreement in order to, among other
things, convert the facility into two tranches with different principal amortization schedules and
different interest rates, as further described below (the A&R Loans). The parties closed the A&R
Loans on May 31, 2007.
Interest on borrowings is payable semi-annually on March 28 and September 28, and commenced on
September 28, 2007. The applicable LIBOR rate at
September 30, 2007 was 5.1%. Remaining payments of
principal on the A&R Loans are due as follows on September 28, for fiscal years ending May 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche A |
|
Tranche B |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we made principal and interest payments of $94.0 million and
$11.2 million, respectively. Accrued interest at the end of the period related to the long-term
debt was $0.1 million.
As of November 30, 2007, we are in compliance with all of our debt covenants under the A&R Loans.
NOTE 12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based on the information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of
making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance, we review the operations of
the business by looking at four reporting segments. In prior fiscal years we reported two segments,
SCN and H3C. In fiscal 2008, we have realigned our internal reporting and, as a result, we have
changed our segment reporting to be in line with the way we are now internally managing our
business. This change breaks-out the SCN segment into the Data and Voice business unit (DVBU),
our TippingPoint security division (TippingPoint) and corporate expenses (Corp). We do not use
any allocation methods to distribute these corporate expenses to our operating business units.
Management evaluates segment performance based on segment revenue, gross profit, direct operating
expense and operating income (loss).
12
Summarized financial information of our operations by segment for the three and six months ended
November 30, 2007 and 2006 is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
DVBU |
|
Point |
|
Corp |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
$ |
182,823 |
|
|
$ |
139,879 |
|
|
$ |
25,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(30,686 |
)a |
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
100,673 |
|
|
|
40,125 |
|
|
|
17,536 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)b |
|
|
(6,114 |
)c |
|
|
152,120 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
72,926 |
|
|
|
49,610 |
|
|
|
16,989 |
|
|
|
11,436 |
b |
|
|
42,490 |
d |
|
|
193,451 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
27,747 |
|
|
$ |
(9,485 |
) |
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
(11,536 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,604 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended November 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
DVBU |
|
Point |
|
Corp |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
$ |
190,291 |
|
|
$ |
144,268 |
|
|
$ |
22,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(23,840 |
)a |
|
$ |
332,976 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
90,715 |
|
|
|
45,377 |
|
|
|
15,042 |
|
|
|
(600 |
)b |
|
|
(383 |
)c |
|
|
150,151 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
61,051 |
|
|
|
51,884 |
|
|
|
17,058 |
|
|
|
10,750 |
b |
|
|
18,788 |
d |
|
|
159,531 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
29,664 |
|
|
$ |
(6,507 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,016 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,350 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,171 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
DVBU |
|
Point |
|
Corp |
|
Eliminations/Other |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
$ |
369,751 |
|
|
$ |
279,455 |
|
|
$ |
51,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(63,224 |
)a |
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
195,463 |
|
|
|
83,667 |
|
|
|
34,162 |
|
|
|
(210 |
)b |
|
|
(12,026 |
)c |
|
|
301,056 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
140,737 |
|
|
|
97,812 |
|
|
|
34,168 |
|
|
|
22,957 |
b |
|
|
72,400 |
d |
|
|
368,074 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
54,726 |
|
|
$ |
(14,145 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,167 |
) |
|
$ |
(84,426 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended November 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
H3C |
|
DVBU |
|
Point |
|
Corp |
|
Eliminations/Other |
|
Total |
Revenue |
|
$ |
360,259 |
|
|
$ |
281,336 |
|
|
$ |
41,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(49,487 |
)a |
|
$ |
633,120 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
170,799 |
|
|
|
89,921 |
|
|
|
27,252 |
|
|
|
(690 |
)b |
|
|
(702 |
)c |
|
|
286,580 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
120,839 |
|
|
|
107,504 |
|
|
|
33,392 |
|
|
|
21,231 |
b |
|
|
33,862 |
d |
|
|
316,828 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
49,960 |
|
|
$ |
(17,583 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,140 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,921 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,248 |
) |
|
|
|
a |
|
- Represents eliminations for inter-company revenue during the respective periods. |
|
b |
|
- Represents costs not directly attributable to any operating business segment. |
|
c |
|
- Includes stock based compensation in all periods plus purchase accounting inventory related
adjustments as
applicable. |
|
d |
|
- Includes stock-based compensation, amortization and restructuring in all periods and
acquisition related expenses
as applicable. |
13
Certain product groups accounted for a significant portion of our sales. Sales from these product
groups as a percentage of total sales for the respective periods are as follows (in thousands
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
255,533 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
$ |
272,852 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
517,509 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
516,885 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
Security |
|
|
35,062 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
31,582 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
66,545 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
57,044 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Voice |
|
|
16,657 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
16,549 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
32,978 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
32,498 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Services |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
8,568 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
18,983 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
16,919 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Legacy connectivity
products |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
9,774 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
332,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
633,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended November 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended November 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
China |
|
$ |
143,107 |
|
|
$ |
158,276 |
|
|
$ |
289,861 |
|
|
$ |
290,785 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
73,209 |
|
|
|
70,933 |
|
|
|
142,871 |
|
|
|
140,467 |
|
North America |
|
|
52,589 |
|
|
|
55,159 |
|
|
|
112,607 |
|
|
|
113,582 |
|
Asia Pacific (except China) |
|
|
25,865 |
|
|
|
28,312 |
|
|
|
49,247 |
|
|
|
52,671 |
|
Latin and South America |
|
|
23,031 |
|
|
|
20,296 |
|
|
|
42,649 |
|
|
|
35,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
$ |
332,976 |
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
|
$ |
633,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales information by geography to the extent available is reported based on the customers
designated delivery point, except in the case of H3Cs original equipment manufacturer, or OEM,
sales which are based on the hub locations of H3Cs OEM partners.
NOTE 14. LITIGATION
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive and
disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are
difficult to predict. We believe that we have meritorious defenses in the matter set forth below
in which we are named as a defendant. An unfavorable resolution of the lawsuit described below
could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of
operations, or cash flow. We cannot
estimate the loss or range of loss that may be reasonably possible as a result of this litigation
and, accordingly, we have not recorded any associated liability in our consolidated balance sheets.
On December 5, 2001, TippingPoint and two of its current and former officers and directors, as well
as the managing underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering, were named as defendants in
a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The lawsuit, which is part of a consolidated action that includes over 300
similar actions, is captioned In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Brian Levey vs.
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc., et al. (Civil Action Number 01-CV-10976). The principal
allegation in the lawsuit is that the defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate the initial
public offering and subsequent market price of TippingPoints stock (and the stock of other public
companies) by knowingly assisting the underwriters requirement that certain of their customers had
to purchase stock in a specific initial public offering as a condition to being allocated shares in
the initial public offerings of other companies. In relation to TippingPoint, the purported
plaintiff class for the lawsuit comprises all persons who purchased TippingPoint stock from
March 17, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The suit seeks rescission of the purchase prices paid by
purchasers of shares of TippingPoint common stock. On September 10, 2002, TippingPoints counsel
and counsel for the plaintiffs entered into an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiffs
dismissed, without prejudice, TippingPoints former and current officers and directors from the
lawsuit. In May 2003, a memorandum of understanding was executed by counsel for the plaintiffs,
the issuer-defendants and their insurers setting forth the terms of a settlement that would result
in the termination of all claims brought by the plaintiffs against the issuer-defendants and the
individual
defendants named in the lawsuit. In August 2003, TippingPoints Board of Directors approved the
settlement
14
terms described in the memorandum of understanding. In May 2004, TippingPoint signed a
settlement agreement on behalf of itself and its current and former directors and officers with the
plaintiffs. This settlement agreement formalizes the previously approved terms of the memorandum
of understanding and, subject to certain conditions, provides for the complete dismissal, with
prejudice, of all claims against TippingPoint and its current and former directors and officers.
Any direct financial impact of the settlement is expected to be borne by TippingPoints insurers.
On August 31, 2005, the District Court issued its preliminary approval of the settlement terms.
The settlement remains subject to numerous conditions, including final approval by the District
Court. There can be no assurance that such conditions will be met. If the District Court rejects
the settlement agreement, in whole or in part, or the settlement does not occur for any other
reason and the litigation against TippingPoint continues, we intend to defend this action
vigorously, and to the extent necessary, to seek indemnification and/or contribution from the
underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering pursuant to its underwriting agreement with
the underwriters. However, there can be no assurance that indemnification or contribution will be
available to TippingPoint or enforceable against the underwriters.
On December 22, 2006, Australias Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization (CSIRO) filed
suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler Division) against
several manufacturers and suppliers of wireless products, including 3Com, seeking money damages and
injunctive relief. The complaint alleges that the manufacture, use, and sale of wireless products
compliant with the IEEE 802.11(a) or 802.11(g) wireless standards infringes on CSIROs patent, U.S.
Patent No. 5,487,069. On March 9, 2007, 3Com filed its Answer, denying infringement and claiming
invalidity and unenforceability of the CSIRO patent, among other defenses. The case is in the
discovery phase of litigation. The majority of 3Coms wireless products are supplied to the Company
under OEM Purchase and Development Agreements that impose substantial intellectual property
indemnifications obligations upon 3Coms suppliers. We cannot make any predictions as to the
outcome of this litigation and intend to vigorously defend the matter.
Between September 28, 2007 and October 10, 2007, five putative class action complaints were filed
in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in connection with the announcement of the
proposed acquisition of the Company by affiliates of Bain Capital
Partners Fisk v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3256-VCL; Bendit v. 3Com
Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3258-VCL; Litvintchouk v. Robert Y.L. Mao, et al., Civil
Action No. 3264-VCL; Kadlec v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3268-VCL; and Kahn v.
3Com Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3286-VCL. On October 12, 2007, the above-referenced
actions were consolidated for all purposes and captioned: IN RE: 3COM SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION,
Civil Action No. 3256-VCL. An additional two putative class action complaints were filed in the
Superior Court of Middlesex County, Massachusetts Tansey v. 3Com Corporation, et al., Civil
Action No. 07-3768, and Davenport v. Benhamou, et al., Civil Action No. 07-3973F. On November 2 and
13, 2007, the defendants filed motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, stay the two
Massachusetts proceedings. On December 20, 2007, the Davenport case was stayed pending the
resolution of class certification in the consolidated Delaware action captioned IN RE: 3COM
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. The motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, stay filed in the Tansey
case is still pending. All of the complaints name 3Com and the current members of our board of
directors as defendants. All of the complaints except the Tansey and Kahn petitions also name Paul
G. Yovovich, a former member of our board of directors, as a defendant. Excepting the Tansey and
Davenport petitions, all of the complaints also name Bain Capital Partners as a defendant. The
Tansey complaint names Bain Capital, LLC as a defendant. The Davenport complaint also names
Diamond II Acquisition Corp. and Diamond II Holdings, Inc. as defendants. Diamond II Acquisition
Corp. was also named as a defendant in the Kahn complaint. The Bendit complaint also names Huawei
Technologies Company as a defendant, and the Tansey complaint also names Huawei Technology Co. Ltd.
as a defendant. Plaintiffs purport to represent stockholders of 3Com who are similarly situated to
them. Among other things, the seven complaints allege that the proposed purchase price of $5.30 per
share is inadequate and that our directors, in approving the proposed Merger, breached fiduciary
duties owed to 3Coms shareholders because they allegedly failed to take steps to maximize the
value to our public stockholders. The complaints further allege that Bain Capital Partners and, in
some cases, 3Com and Huawei, aided and abetted these alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The
complaints seek class certification, damages and certain forms of equitable relief, including
enjoining the consummation of the Merger and a direction to our board of directors to obtain a
transaction in the best interests of 3Coms shareholders. We believe that plaintiffs allegations
are without merit, and we intend to vigorously contest these actions. There can be no assurance,
however, that we will be successful in our defense of these actions.
15
NOTE 15. PROPOSED ACQUISITION BY AFFILIATES OF BAIN CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
On September 28, 2007, the Company, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) by and among the Company, Diamond II Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized under the
laws of the Cayman Islands, (Newco), and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and
a wholly owned subsidiary of Newco (Merger Sub). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement,
Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, and as a result the Company will continue as
the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Newco (the Merger). Newco is
controlled by Bain Capital Fund IX, L.P. and Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co. Ltd. The
Board of Directors of the Company unanimously approved this
transaction.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding
share of common stock of the Company will be canceled and will be automatically converted into the
right to receive $5.30 in cash, without interest. Vesting of all outstanding 3Com equity based
awards will continue until the closing of the merger, in accordance with their respective terms. At
the closing of the Merger, all outstanding shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units
will fully vest and such outstanding shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards
will be purchased for $5.30 per share less applicable withholdings. Immediately prior to the
closing of the Merger, outstanding options will become fully vested and exercisable. To the extent
unexercised as of the closing of the Merger, options with an exercise price below $5.30 per share
will be cashed out at the difference between $5.30 and the exercise price of the option, less
applicable withholdings. All other options will terminate as of the closing of the Merger.
The Merger Agreement contains a non-solicitation or no shop provision restricting the Company
from soliciting alternative acquisition proposals from third parties and from providing information
to and engaging in discussions with third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals. The
no-shop provision is subject to a customary fiduciary-out provision which allows the Company
under certain circumstances to participate in discussions with third parties with respect to bona
fide written unsolicited alternative acquisition proposals and to terminate the Merger Agreement
under certain circumstances after paying a termination fee of $66.0 million. The Merger Agreement
further provides that, upon its termination under specified circumstances, the buyers would be
required to pay the Company a termination fee of either $66.0 million or $110.0 million as
applicable.
The buyers have obtained equity and debt financing commitments for the transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement. The aggregate proceeds of the commitments, together with the available cash
of the Company, will be sufficient for the buyers to pay the aggregate merger consideration and all
related fees and expenses. Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions to
closing, including the approval of the Companys stockholders and receipt of requisite U.S. and
foreign antitrust and competition law approvals.
Several purported class action lawsuits have been filed since September 28, 2007 by 3Com
shareholders against the Company, its current directors, a former director, Bain Capital Partners,
and in some cases, Huawei Technologies. See note 14 Litigation for a further discussion of these
actions.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We are incorporated in Delaware. A pioneer in the computer networking industry, we provide secure,
converged networking solutions, as well as maintenance and support services, for enterprises and
public sector organizations of all sizes. Headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts, we have
worldwide operations, including sales, marketing, research and development, and customer service
and support capabilities.
16
Our products and services can generally be classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security; |
|
|
§ |
|
Voice; |
|
|
§ |
|
Services; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Legacy Connectivity Products. |
We have undergone significant changes in recent years, including:
|
§ |
|
The proposed acquisition of the Company by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners; |
|
|
§ |
|
the formation and subsequent 100 percent acquisition of our Chinese joint venture H3C; |
|
|
§ |
|
financing a portion of the purchase price for our acquisition of H3C by entering into
a $430 million senior secured credit agreement; |
|
|
§ |
|
restructuring activities, which included outsourcing of information technology, all
manufacturing activity in our DVBU segment, significant headcount reductions in other
functions, and selling excess facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
significant changes to our executive leadership; |
|
|
§ |
|
acquiring TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.; and |
|
|
§ |
|
realigning our DVBU sales and marketing channels and expenditures. |
We believe an overview of these significant recent events is helpful to gain a clearer
understanding of our operating results.
Significant Events
Proposed Acquisition of the Company
On September 28, 2007 the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger to be acquired by an
entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners. Affiliates of Huawei Investment &
Holding Co. Ltd will be minority investors in the acquiring entity. Pursuant to the Merger
Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of common stock
of the Company will be canceled and will be automatically converted into the right to receive $5.30
in cash, without interest. We currently expect to complete the transaction by the first calendar
quarter of 2008. Consummation of the Merger is, however, subject to customary conditions to
closing, including the approval of the Companys stockholders and receipt of requisite U.S. and
foreign antitrust and competition law, many of which are outside of our control. The review
by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (or CFIUS) of our proposed acquisition
by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners is a confidential process to which we submitted voluntarily.
We and Bain Capital Partners are working closely with CFIUS to provide U.S. officials with
information about the proposed transaction. For a further discussion of risks associated with the
proposed acquisition, please refer to Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A in this Form 10-Q.
H3C
On November 17, 2003, we formed H3C, formerly known as the Huawei-3Com joint venture, with a
subsidiary of Huawei Technologies, Ltd. (Huawei). H3C is domiciled in Hong Kong, and has its
principal operating center in Hangzhou, China. Two years after formation of H3C, we had the
one-time option to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest from Huawei. We exercised
this right and entered into an agreement to purchase an additional two percent ownership interest
in H3C from Huawei for an aggregate purchase price of $28.0 million. The acquisition occurred on
January 27, 2006 at which time we owned a majority interest in the joint venture and, therefore,
consolidated H3Cs financial statements (beginning February 1, 2006). Three years after formation
of H3C, we and Huawei each had the right to initiate a bid process to purchase the equity interest
in H3C held by the other. 3Com initiated the bidding process on November 15, 2006 to buy Huaweis
49 percent stake in H3C. Huawei ultimately accepted our bid and the transaction closed on March 29,
2007, at which time 3Com paid the $882 million purchase price in full. As such, H3C is a wholly
owned subsidiary for the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 as compared to the same
period of the previous year when we owned 51 percent and Huawei had a minority ownership.
We financed a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of Huaweis 49 percent ownership in
H3C through a $430 million senior secured credit agreement with several lenders.
17
New Products
We have introduced multiple new products targeted at the small, medium and large enterprise
markets, including modular switches and routers, as well as voice over IP, or VoIP, security,
wireless, storage, surveillance and unified switching solutions. We also announced our Open
Services Networking, or OSN, strategy.
Business Environment and Future Trends
Networking industry analysts and participants differ widely in their assessments concerning the
prospects for near-term industry growth. Industry factors and trends also present significant
challenges in the medium-term with respect to our goals for sales growth, gross margin improvement
and profitability. Such factors and trends include:
|
§ |
|
Intense competition in the market for higher-end, enterprise core routing and switching products; |
|
|
§ |
|
Aggressive product pricing by competitors targeted at gaining share in market segments where we
have had a strong position historically, such as the small to medium-sized enterprise market;
and |
|
|
§ |
|
The advanced nature and ready availability of merchant silicon, which allows low-end competitors
to deliver competitive products and makes it increasingly difficult for us to differentiate our
products. |
We believe that long-term success in this environment requires us to be a global technology leader
and to continue to invest in the development of key technologies. Our key focus for the remainder
of our fiscal 2008 will be to continue to manage each of our operating segments toward sustainable
growth, to make targeted investments in the integration of sales efforts and back office functions
between H3C and both DVBU and Corporate, to maintain investment in key technologies, and to manage
our TippingPoint and DVBU segments towards profitability. In the remainder of fiscal 2008, we also
intend to continue investing in our H3C segment, in which we expect continued growth, but at a
slower rate than in the past. This is expected to involve continued investment in research and
development, increased focus on growth both inside and outside of China, and growing the dedicated
H3C infrastructure in concert with a global 3Com consolidated plan. In addition we may make
certain targeted investments in the integration of the H3C with both the DVBU and Corporate
operating segments designed to drive more profitable near and long-term growth of the business.
We continue to face significant challenges in the DVBU segment with respect to sales growth, gross
margin and profitability. We believe future sales growth for the DVBU segment depends to a
substantial degree on increased sales of our networking products, and we believe our best growth
opportunity requires us to expand our product lines targeting small and medium businesses, or SMB,
customers as well as selected medium-enterprise customers. These product enhancements are expected
to be based in part upon leveraging open source and open architecture platforms to differentiate
our networking offerings. These are also expected to be complemented by expanded security
offerings such as the development of attack, access and application controls.
Finally, we intend to look to improve our channels to market on these products. In order to
achieve our sales goals in the DVBU segment for the remainder of fiscal 2008, it is important that
we continue to enhance the features and capabilities of our products in a timely manner in order to
expand our addressable market opportunities, distribution channels and market competitiveness.
Also, we expect a very competitive pricing environment for the foreseeable future; this will likely
continue to exert downward pressure on our DVBU sales, gross margin and profitability.
Other important factors in the continued success of our H3C business are expected to include:
retaining key management and employees, continuing sales through Huawei as an OEM partner of H3C in
the near-to-medium term, and continuing the year-over-year growth in H3C.
18
Our future plans for fiscal 2008 include a potential initial public offering (IPO) of common stock
of our wholly owned subsidiary TippingPoint, our business that develops, markets and sells security
products and services, such as its intrusion prevention system appliances and its security
protection updates through its Digital Vaccine service. Given our announcement regarding our
proposed acquisition by an entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, these plans
are subject to the discretion of the purchaser in the event our acquisition closes. Any sale of
TippingPoint stock would be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, and such shares of common
stock would only be offered and sold by means of a prospectus. This Form 10-Q does not constitute
an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any securities of TippingPoint, and there
will not be any sale of any such securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation, or sale
would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state.
Summary of Three Months Ended November 30, 2007 Financial Performance
|
§ |
|
Our sales in the three months ended November 30, 2007 were $317.8 million, compared to
sales of $333.0 million in the three months ended November 20, 2006, a decrease of $15.2
million, or 4.6 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our gross margin improved to 47.9 percent in the three months ended November 30, 2007
from 45.1 percent in the three months ended November 30, 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our operating expenses in the three months ended November 30, 2007 were $193.5 million,
compared to $159.5 million in the three months ended November 30, 2006, a net increase of
$34.0 million, or 21.3 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our net loss in the three months ended November 30, 2007 was $35.6 million, compared to
a net loss of $3.5 million in the three months ended November 30, 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our balance sheet contains cash and equivalents of $419.1 million as of November 30,
2007, compared to cash and equivalents of $559.2 million at June 1, 2007 (the end of fiscal
2007). The balance sheet also includes debt of $336 million with $48 million classified as
a current liability as of November 30, 2007 compared with debt of $430 million with $94
million classified as a current liability at the end of fiscal 2007. |
Summary of Six Months Ended November 30, 2007 Financial Performance
|
§ |
|
Our sales in the six months ended November 30, 2007 were $637.2 million, compared to
sales of $633.1 million in the six months ended November 20, 2006, an increase of $4.1
million, or 0.6 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our gross margin improved to 47.2 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2007 from
45.3 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our operating expenses in the six months ended November 30, 2007 were $368.1 million,
compared to $316.8 million in the six months ended November 30, 2006, a net increase of
$51.3 million, or 16.2 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our net loss in the six months ended November 30, 2007 was $54.3 million, compared to
a net loss of $17.6 million in the six months ended November 30, 2006. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our critical accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 1, 2007. These policies
continue to be those that we feel are most important to a readers ability to understand our
financial results.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), that clarifies the accounting and recognition for income tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in our tax returns. FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on June 2, 2007 which
resulted in no adjustment to the beginning of the year retained earnings balance. As of the
adoption date, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits of $24.8 million and valuation allowances
of $937.1 million, for a total of $961.9 million in tax benefits. The valuation allowance of $937.1
million includes $143.5 million attributable to the tax benefit of stock option deductions, which,
if recognized, will be allocated directly to paid-in-capital. In addition, the valuation allowance
includes approximately $59.3 million for acquired net operating loss carryforwards which, if
realized, would result in a decrease in goodwill. The remaining tax benefits, if recognized would
affect our effective tax rate. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008
19
the balance
of unrecognized tax benefits excluding the valuation allowance was $27.4 million, representing an
increase over the fiscal year to date of $2.6 million. All of this increase, if recognized, would
affect our effective tax rate. The amount of the increase on the second quarter was $1.3 million.
Substantially all of these increases relate to tax positions taken in the current fiscal period.
The Company files a consolidated U.S. income tax return and tax returns in various state and local
jurisdictions, and our subsidiaries file tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. In addition
to the U.S., our major taxing jurisdictions include China, the United Kingdom and Singapore. For
each of the major taxing jurisdictions, the tax years fiscal 1999 through fiscal 2007 remain open
to examination by the respective taxing authorities.
We are currently subject to examination in certain foreign jurisdictions in relation to transfer
pricing and other issues. It is possible that certain of these examinations will be settled within
the next twelve months. As a result it is reasonably possible that there could be a material
change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits, however it is not possible to estimate the
amount of the potential change.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. As of June 2, 2007, the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions was $2.1 million, which has been recorded within the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits. As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008 the balance of
interest and penalties included in unrecognized tax benefits was $2.5 million, representing an
increase over the fiscal year to date of $0.4 million. The amount of the increase in the second
quarter was $0.2 million.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of total sales
represented by the line items reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30 |
|
|
November 30 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Amortization and write-down of intangible assets |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Gain (loss) on investments, net |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest (expense) income, net |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Minority interest in income of consolidated joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(11.2 |
)% |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(8.5 |
)% |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Sales
Consolidated sales for the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 by segment were as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
H3C |
|
$ |
182.8 |
|
|
$ |
190.3 |
|
|
$ |
369.7 |
|
|
$ |
360.3 |
|
DVBU |
|
|
139.9 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
279.5 |
|
|
|
281.3 |
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
Intercompany
eliminations and other |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
|
|
(63.3 |
) |
|
|
(49.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Consolidated sales |
|
$ |
317.8 |
|
|
$ |
333.0 |
|
|
$ |
637.2 |
|
|
$ |
633.1 |
|
|
|
|
Sales in our H3C segment decreased $7.5 million, or 3.9 percent, in the three months ended November
30, 2007 and increased $9.4 million, or 2.6 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2007
compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in sales in the three months
ended November 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to reduced OEM sales to Huawei, partially offset
by appreciation on the Renminbi related to our direct sales in China. The growth for the six months
ended November 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to the appreciation on the Renminbi related to
our direct sales in China as well as increased sales to our DVBU segment.
Sales in our DVBU segment decreased $4.4 million, or 3.0 percent, in the three months ended
November 30, 2007 and decreased $1.8 million, or 0.6 percent in the six months ended November 30,
2007 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in sales in the three
months ended November 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to decreased sales in our connectivity
products and slower than expected sales in our North America region. Most of the decrease in our
North America region was in our networking products. This decrease was partially offset by
increased networking sales in our EMEA region. The decrease in sales in the six months ended
November 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to decreased sales in our connectivity business which
resulted from our exit of that business and reductions in North America region mostly offset by
increased demand for DVBUs Gigabit products in both our EMEA region and our Latin America region.
Sales in our TippingPoint segment increased $3.5 million, or 15.7 percent, in the three months
ended November 30, 2007 and increased $10.3 million, or 25.1 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2007 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in sales
in the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to an increase in
large account sales and related service revenue.
Intercompany eliminations and other increased by $6.8 million or 28.5 percent, in the three months ended
November 30, 2007 and increased $13.8 million, or 27.9 percent in the six months ended November 30,
2007 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. This increase in both periods is
primarily due to increased sales from our H3C segment to our DVBU segment.
Consolidated revenues decreased by $15.2 million or 4.6 percent in the three months ended November
30, 2007 and increased by $4.1 million, or 0.6 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2007
compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year.
Sales by major product categories are as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30 |
|
|
November 30 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Networking |
|
$ |
255.5 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
$ |
272.9 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
517.5 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
516.9 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
Security |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Voice |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Services |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Connectivity Products |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
317.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
333.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
637.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
633.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Networking revenue includes sales of our Layer 2 and Layer 3 stackable 10/100/1000 managed
switching lines, our modular switching lines, routers, wireless switching offerings and our small
to medium-sized enterprise market products. Sales of our networking products decreased $17.4
million or 6.4 percent in the three months ended November 30, 2007 and increased $0.6 million in
the six months ended November 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year.
The decrease in the three months ended November 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to slower than
expected sales in our North American region. The increase in the six months ended November 30, 2007
is primarily attributable to expansion in our global sales of H3C developed products mostly offset
by slower than expected sales in our North American region.
Security revenue includes our TippingPoint® products and services, as well as other security
products, such as H3Cs security offerings, and our virtual private network, or VPN, and network
access control, or NAC, offerings. Sales of our security products increased $3.5 million or 11.1
percent in the three months ended November 30, 2007 and $9.5 million, or 16.7 percent for the six
months ended November 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The
increase is primarily driven by increased sales of our TippingPoint products in our North American
region due to a couple of large deals and slightly increased sales on a global basis.
Voice revenue includes our VCX and NBX® voice-over-internet protocol, or VoIP, product lines, as
well as voice gateway offerings. Sales of our Voice products increased $0.2 million or 1.2 percent
in the three months ended November, 2007 and $0.5 million, or 1.5 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year due to increased demand
in North America.
Services revenue includes professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint
maintenance which is included in security revenue. Services revenue increased $1.3 million or 15.1
percent in the three months ended November 30, 2007 and $2.1 million, or 12.4 percent in the six
months ended November 30, 2007 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The
increase was driven by increased service offerings tied to expanded H3C networking sales.
Connectivity Products revenue in the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 was minimal
compared to prior periods with continued future revenue only expected to be from royalty
arrangements. The decrease resulted from our exit of this product line.
Gross Margin
Gross margin for the three and six months ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 by segment were as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
H3C |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
47.7 |
% |
|
|
52.9 |
% |
|
|
47.4 |
% |
DVBU |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
TippingPoint |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
|
66.4 |
% |
Intercompany eliminations and other |
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
47.9 |
% |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
|
45.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin in our H3C segment improved 7.4 points to 55.1 percent in the three months ended
November 30, 2007 from 47.7 percent, and 5.5 points to 52.9 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2007 from 47.4 percent in the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The
improvement in gross profit margin is explained by reduced cost of products, and improved pricing
of products, including inter-company pricing as well as healthy
growth of new products with higher margins.
Gross margin in our DVBU segment decreased 2.8 points to 28.7 percent in the three months ended
November 30, 2007 from 31.5 percent in the same period of the previous fiscal year, and 2.1 points
to 29.9 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2007 from 32.0 percent in the same period of
the previous fiscal year. The decline is explained by costs associated with our change in service
providers and reduced pricing, primarily in the mid-range switching product-offerings and
inter-company pricing, offset in part by product cost reductions.
Gross margin in our TippingPoint segment improved 0.4 points to 68.0 percent in the three months
ended November 30, 2007 from 67.6 percent and 0.3 points to 66.7 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2007 from 66.4 percent in the same period in the previous fiscal year.
Gross
margin related to intercompany eliminations and other improved 16.2
points to 20.3 percent in the three months ended November 30,
2007 from 4.1 percent and 16.6 points to 19.4 percent in the six
months ended November 30, 2007 from 2.8 percent in the same
period in the previous fiscal year. The increase in both periods
relate to purchase accounting adjustments resulting from our
acquisition of the final 49 percent of H3C not present in the prior
period.
22
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
80.8 |
|
|
$ |
76.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
155.2 |
|
|
$ |
153.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Amortization |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
114 |
% |
Restructuring |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
417 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
620 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
193.5 |
|
|
$ |
159.5 |
|
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
368.1 |
|
|
$ |
316.8 |
|
|
$ |
51.3 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing. The most significant factors in the increase in the three and six months
ended November 30, 2007 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007 was the increased China related
sales and marketing costs of $3.6 million due to increased compensation related charges.
Research and Development. The most significant factor contributing to the increase in the three
and six months ended November 30, 2007 compared to the same period in fiscal 2007 was continued
investment in our China-based development efforts and increased headcount of 195 Chinese employees.
General and Administrative. The most significant factor in the increase in the three and six
months ended November 30, 2007 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2007 was $7.6 million of
acquisition related costs from the proposed acquisition by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners.
Amortization. Amortization increased $14.1 million and
$27.9 million in the three and six months ended November 30, 2007, respectively, when compared to
the previous fiscal year due to a significant increase in amortization charges related to our
acquisition of the remaining 49% of H3C in March.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges in the three months ended November 30, 2007 included $2.4 million for
severance and outplacement costs and $0.7 million in facilities-related charges. Restructuring
charges in the six months ended November 30, 2007 included $3.3 million for severance and
outplacement costs and $0.3 million in facilities-related charges. Restructuring charges in the
three months ended November 30, 2006 included 1.6 million for severance and outplacement costs and
$1.2 million for facilities-related charges partially offset by a $2.2 million in benefit resulting
from for a change in estimate on previously established restructuring provisions. Restructuring
charges in the first six months of fiscal 2007 primarily included $9.2 million for severance and
outplacement costs and $1.5 million for facilities-related charges which were almost offset by an
$8.0 million gain on the sale of our Santa Clara facility and $2.2 million in benefit resulting
from a change in estimate on previously established restructuring provisions.
See Note 4 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of
restructuring charges.
Gain
(loss) on Investments, Net
Net gains on investments were zero million and $0.3 million in the three and six months ended
November 30, 2007, respectively, which resulted from gains on our remaining investment portfolios.
Net losses on investments were $0.9 million in the three months ended November 30, 2006 primarily
reflecting a $1.0 million loss from the sale of our venture fund portfolios. This sale completed
the sales of our venture portfolios. Net gains on investments were $1.4 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2007, primarily reflecting a $1.4 million gain from the sale of certain investment
portfolios.
Interest Expense/Income, Net
In the three and six months ended November 30, 2007, the Company incurred $3.9 million and $7.5
million, respectively, in net interest expense, versus net interest income of $11.4 million and
$21.5 million in same periods of the prior fiscal year. The change was directly attributable to the
reduced cash balance and incurrence of debt, both resulting from the use of funds and borrowings
for the acquisition of the final 49 percent of H3C in March 2007.
23
Other Income, Net
Other income, net was $10.3 million in the three months ended November 30, 2007, a decrease of $2.3
million compared to the three months ended November 30, 2006. The decrease was in our Corporate
segment which in the prior-year period included a gain from the insurance settlement on our Hemel
facility of $3 million, net of other small increases. Other income, net was $22.4 million in the
six months ended November 30, 2007, an increase of $5.1 million compared to the six months ended
November 30, 2006. The increase was primarily due to a $5.0 million gain from the sale of a patent
no longer used in our business and larger software subsidy amounts in our H3C segment in the six
month period, offset in part by the absence of the Hemel facility insurance gain.
Income Tax Provision
Our income tax provision was $0.7 million for the three months ended November 30, 2007, a decrease
of $1.6 million when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year. In the
current quarter we had a favorable final position on an insurance settlement of $1.6 million as
well as a discrete benefit of $0.5 million related to refunds of state taxes for prior periods.
The remainder of the income tax provision for the current quarter and all of the provision for the
corresponding period was the result of providing for taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions at
various statutory rates. H3C is currently entitled to tax concessions which began in 2004 and
exempted it from the PRC income tax for its initial two years and entitle it to a 50 percent
reduction in income tax in the following three years. Consequently, subject to the possible effects
of the new PRC tax laws discussed in Risk Factors below, we currently expect the H3C statutory
rate in China to be 7.5 percent for the calendar years 2007 and 2008, and 15 percent thereafter.
The company has US Federal net operating loss carryforwards in the amount of $2.5 billion as of May
31, 2007.
Minority Interest of Huawei in the Income of Consolidated Huawei-3Com Joint Venture
There is no minority interest in the three or six months ended November 30, 2007 as H3C is now a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
In the three and six months ended November, 2006 we recorded an allocation to minority interest of
$15.0 million and $23.9 million, respectively, representing Huaweis 49 percent interest in the net
income reported by the H3C joint venture for the three and six months ended November 30, 2006.
Net Loss
Our net loss in the three months ended November 30, 2007 was $35.6 million, a $32.1 million
increase in net loss when compared to the same period of the previous fiscal year. The increase
was primarily driven by increased amortization expenses of $14.0 million due to the acquisition of
the remaining 49 percent of H3C, acquisition costs of $7.6 million related to the proposed
acquisition by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, increased sales and marketing related costs of
$4.6 million, increased R&D expenses of $4.0 million and increased restructuring charges of $2.5
million, partially offset by increased gross profits during the quarter. Our net loss in the six
months ended November 30, 2007 was $54.3 million, a $36.7 million increase in net loss when
compared to the same period of the previous fiscal year. The increase was primarily driven by
increased amortization expenses of $27.9 million due to the acquisition of the remaining 49 percent
of H3C, acquisition costs of $7.6 million related to the proposed acquisition by affiliates of Bain
Capital Partners, increased sales and marketing related costs of $1.9 million, increased R&D
expenses of $8.6 million and increased restructuring charges of $3.0 million, partially offset by
increased gross profits and a $5.0 million gain from the sale of a patent during the period.
24
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and equivalents as of November 30, 2007 were $419.1 million, a decrease of $140.1 million
compared to the balance of $559.2 million as of May 31, 2007. The following table shows the major
components of our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended November
30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
559.2 |
|
|
$ |
501.1 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(52.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
61.9 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(89.7 |
) |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
Other |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
419.1 |
|
|
$ |
529.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $52.6 million in the six months ended November 30, 2007,
primarily reflecting our net loss of $54.3 million and increased deferred income taxes of $1.2
million,, more than offset by $69.3 million of depreciation and amortization and $9.9 million of
stock-based compensation. Changes in assets and liabilities resulted in a net use of cash of $76.2
million, with other liabilities decreasing $68.1 million primarily due to a $95 million previously
accrued compensation charge related to the change-in-control portion of H3Cs Equity Appreciation
Rights Plan (which was triggered by the acquisition of the remaining 49% of H3C). Additionally
accounts receivable increased $16.8 million, partially offset by
a net collection in notes receivable of
$6.4 million and a decrease in inventory of $16.9 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $8.4 million for the six months ended November 30, 2007,
consisting primarily of $9.7 million of net outflows related to purchases of property and
equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $89.7 million in the six months ended November 30, 2007.
During the six months ended November 30, 2007, we made a principal payment of $94.0 million related
to our long term debt and we acquired $1.3 million of shares of restricted stock awards upon
vesting from employees including those shares tendered to us to satisfy the tax withholding
obligations that arise in connection with such vesting. This was offset by proceeds of $5.7 million
from issuances of our common stock upon exercise of stock options.
As of November 30, 2007, bank-issued standby letters of credit and guarantees totaled $6.3 million,
including $5.9 million relating to potential foreign tax, custom, and duty assessments.
We currently have no material capital expenditure purchase commitments other than ordinary course
purchases of computer hardware, software and leasehold improvements. We believe that our future
cash requirements will likely include an aggregate of $5 million to $10 million for professional
fees related to our proposed acquisition by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners that are not
contingent on the closing of the deal.
Cash requirements relating to our senior secured debt for the next twelve months include a March
2008 interest payment of approximately $13.1 million and a September 2008 interest and principal
payment of approximately $61.1 million.
We currently believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be
sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.
EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), that clarifies the accounting and recognition for income tax positions taken or expected to
be taken in our tax returns. FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on June 2, 2007 which
resulted in no adjustment to the beginning of the year retained earnings balance. As of the
adoption date, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits of $24.8 million and valuation allowances
of $937.1 million, for a total of $961.9 million in tax benefits. The valuation allowance of $937.1
million includes $143.5 million attributable to the tax benefit of stock option deductions, which,
if recognized, will be allocated directly to paid-in-capital. In addition, the valuation allowance
includes approximately $59.3 million for acquired net operating loss carryforwards which, if
realized, would result in a decrease in goodwill. The remaining tax benefits, if recognized would
affect our effective tax rate. There was no significant change to the balance of unrecognized tax
benefits during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
The Company files a consolidated U.S. income tax return and tax returns in various state and local
jurisdictions, and our subsidiaries file tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. In addition
to the U.S., our major taxing jurisdictions include China, the United Kingdom and Singapore. For
each of the major taxing jurisdictions, the tax years fiscal 1999 through fiscal 2007 remain open
to examination by the respective taxing authorities.
We are currently subject to examination in certain foreign jurisdictions in relation to transfer
pricing and other issues. It is possible that certain of these examinations will be settled within
the next twelve months. As a result it is reasonably possible that there could be a material
change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits, however it is not possible to estimate the
amount of the potential change.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. As of June 2, 2007, the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions was $2.1 million, which has been recorded within the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits. There was no significant change to this amount during the six months
ended November 30, 2008.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be
based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level
within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by 3Com in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We
have not yet determined the impact, if any, that the implementation of SFAS No. 157 will have on
our results of operations or financial condition.
25
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
108 Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements, which expresses the staffs views regarding the process of quantifying
financial statement misstatements. The Bulletin is effective at our fiscal year end 2008. The
Company currently believes the adoption will have no impact on our
results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require
assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use fair
value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities,
equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. Other eligible items
include firm commitments for financial instruments that otherwise would not be recognized at
inception and non-cash warranty obligations where a warrantor is permitted to pay a third party to
provide the warranty goods or services. If the use of fair value is elected, any upfront costs and
fees related to the item must be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue
costs. The fair value election is irrevocable and generally made on an instrument-by-instrument
basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to measure based on fair value.
At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair value has been
elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Subsequent to the
adoption of SFAS 159, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by 3Com in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009. 3Com currently is determining whether fair value accounting is appropriate
for any of its eligible items and cannot estimate the impact, if any, which SFAS 159 will have on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-3, Accounting for NonRefundable Advance Payments for Goods
or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3
requires that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered
for future research and development activities be deferred and capitalized and recognized as an
expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed. EITF 07-3 is effective,
on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and will be adopted in
the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the
pending adoption of EITF 07-3 on its consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We no longer hold any marketable equity traded securities as of November 30, 2007.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our quarter ended November 30, 2007 pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under the
Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, our President and
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of our
quarter ended November 30, 2007, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three months ended November 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
26
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth in Note 14 to the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk
factors may affect our future business and results. The matters
discussed below could cause our future results to materially differ
from past results or those described in forward-looking statements and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.
Risk Related to Announced Acquisition by an entity controlled by
affiliates of Bain Capital Partners
On September 28, 2007, we announced an agreement to be acquired by an entity controlled by
affiliates of Bain Capital Partners. We cannot provide any assurance that the proposed acquisition
will be consummated. If the transaction closes, we cannot assure you of the timing of the closing.
Consummation of the proposed acquisition is subject to the satisfaction of various conditions,
including approval of the acquisition by a vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our
common stock and other customary closing conditions described in the Merger Agreement. We cannot
guarantee that these closing conditions will be satisfied, that we will receive the required
approvals or that the proposed acquisition will be successfully completed. Many of these conditions
are out of our control. In the event that the proposed acquisition is not completed or is delayed:
|
|
|
managements and our employees attention from our day-to-day business may be diverted
because matters related to the proposed acquisition may require substantial commitments of
their time and resources; |
|
|
|
|
we may lose key employees; |
|
|
|
|
our relationships with customers and vendors may be substantially disrupted as a result
of uncertainties with regard to our business and prospects; |
|
|
|
|
certain costs related to the proposed acquisition, such as legal and accounting fees and
reimbursement of certain expenses, are payable by us whether or not the proposed
acquisition is completed; |
|
|
|
|
under certain circumstances, if the proposed acquisition is not completed, we may be
required to pay a termination (break-up) fee of up to $66 million; and |
|
|
|
|
the market price of shares of our common stock may decline to the extent that the
current market price of those shares reflects a market assumption that the proposed
acquisition will be completed. |
In addition, CFIUS will review this transaction and could recommend that the transaction be
changed, or blocked by the President, on national security grounds.
Any of these events could have a material negative impact on our results of operations and
financial condition and could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
27
Risks Related to Historical Losses, Financial Condition and Substantial Indebtedness
We have incurred significant net losses in recent fiscal periods, including $35.6 million for the
quarter ended November 30, 2007 and $3.5 million for the quarter ended November 30, 2006 and we may
not be able to return to profitability.
We cannot provide assurance that we will return to profitability. While we continue to take steps
designed to improve our results of operations, we have incurred significant net losses in recent
periods. We face a number of challenges that have affected our operating results during the
current and past several fiscal years. Specifically, we have experienced, and may continue to
experience, the following:
|
|
|
declining sales due to price competition and reduced incoming order rate; |
|
|
|
|
operating expenses that, as a percentage of sales, have exceeded our desired financial
model; |
|
|
|
|
management changes; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions and expenses resulting from our workforce reductions, management changes and
employee attrition; |
|
|
|
|
risk of increased excess and obsolete inventories; and |
|
|
|
|
interest expense resulting from our senior secured loan. |
If we cannot overcome these challenges, reduce our expenses and/or increase our revenue, we may not
become profitable.
We may not be able to compensate for lower sales or unexpected cash outlays with cost reductions
sufficient to generate positive net income or cash flow.
If we do not increase our sales, we may need to further reduce costs in order to achieve
profitability. As we have implemented significant cost reduction programs over the last several
years, it may be difficult to make significant further cost reductions without in turn reducing our
sales. If we are not able to effectively reduce our costs and expenses, particularly in our DVBU
and Corporate segments, we may not be able to generate positive net income. If we continue to
experience negative cash flow from operations from our DVBU and Corporate segments over a prolonged
period of time or if we suffer unexpected cash outflows, our liquidity and ability to operate our
business effectively could be adversely affected.
We are unable to predict the exact amount of increased sales and/or cost reductions required for us
to generate positive net income because it is difficult to predict the amount of our future sales
and gross margins. Moreover, the amount of our future sales depends, in part, on future economic
and market conditions, which are difficult to forecast accurately.
Efforts to reduce operating expenses have involved, and could involve further, workforce
reductions, closure of offices and sales or discontinuation of businesses, leading to reduced sales
and other disruptions in our business; if these efforts are not successful, we may experience
higher expenses than we desire.
Our operating expenses as a percent of sales continue to be higher than our desired long-term
financial model. We have taken, and will continue to take, actions to reduce these expenses. For
example, in June 2006 we announced a restructuring plan which focused on reducing components of our
DVBU segment cost structure, including the closure of certain facilities, a reduction in workforce
and focused sales, marketing and services efforts. Such actions have and may in the future include
integration of businesses and regions, reductions in our workforce, closure of facilities,
relocation of functions and activities to lower cost locations, the sale or discontinuation of
businesses, changes or modifications in information technology systems or applications, or process
reengineering. As a result of these actions, the employment of some employees with critical skills
may be terminated and other employees have, and may in the future, leave our company voluntarily
due to the uncertainties associated with our business environment and their job security. In
addition, reductions in overall staffing levels could make it more difficult for us to sustain
historic sales levels, to achieve our growth objectives, to adhere to our preferred business
practices and to address all of our legal and regulatory obligations in an effective manner, which
could, in turn, ultimately lead to missed business opportunities, higher operating costs or
penalties. In addition, we may choose to reinvest some or all of our realized cost savings in
future growth opportunities or in our H3C integration efforts. Any of these events or occurrences,
including the failure to succeed in achieving net cost savings, will likely cause our expense
levels to continue to be at levels above our desired model, which, in turn, could result in a
material adverse impact on our ability to become profitable (and, if we become profitable, to
sustain such profitability).
28
Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial condition; and the related debt service
obligations may adversely affect our cash flow and ability to invest in and grow our businesses.
We now have, and for the foreseeable future will continue to have, a significant amount of
indebtedness. As of November 30, 2007, our total debt balance was $336 million, of which $48
million is due within one year and was classified as a current liability. These amounts represent
borrowing under a senior secured loan incurred to finance a portion of the purchase price for our
March 2007 acquisition from Huawei of its remaining 49 percent equity interest in H3C. In
addition, despite current debt levels, the terms of our indebtedness allow us or our subsidiaries
to incur more debt, subject to certain limitations.
While our senior secured loan is outstanding, we will have annual debt service obligations
(interest and principal) of between approximately $48 million and $172 million. The interest rate
on this loan is floating based on the LIBOR rate; accordingly, if the LIBOR rate is increased,
these amounts could be higher. The maturity date on this loan is September 28, 2012. We intend to
fulfill our debt service obligations primarily from cash generated by our H3C segment operations,
if any, and, to the extent necessary, from its existing cash and investments. Because we
anticipate that a substantial portion of the cash generated by our operations will be used to
service this loan during its term, such funds will not be available to use in future operations, or
investing in our businesses. Further, a significant portion of the excess cash flow generated by
our H3C segment, if any, must be used annually to prepay principal on the loan. The foregoing may
adversely impact our ability to expand our businesses or make other investments. In addition, if
we are unable to generate sufficient cash to meet these obligations and must instead use our
existing cash or investments, we may have to reduce, curtail or terminate other activities of our
businesses.
Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences to us. For example, it could:
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
require the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the
payment of principal of, and interest on, our indebtedness, thereby reducing the
availability of such cash flow to fund growth, working capital, capital expenditures and
other general corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our
industry; and |
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt. |
The restrictions imposed by the terms of our senior secured loan facility could adversely impact
our ability to invest in and grow our H3C business.
Covenants in the agreements governing our senior secured loan materially restrict our H3C
operations, including H3Cs ability to incur debt, pay dividends, make certain investments and
payments, make acquisitions of other businesses and encumber or dispose of assets. These negative
covenants restrict our flexibility in operating our H3C business. The agreements also impose
affirmative covenants, including financial reporting obligations and compliance with law. In
addition, in the event our H3C segments financial results do not meet our plans, the failure to
comply with the financial covenants contained in the loan agreements could lead to a default if we
are unable to amend such financial covenants. Our lenders may attempt to call defaults for
violations of financial covenants (or other items, even if the underlying financial performance of
H3C is satisfactory) in an effort to extract waiver or consent fees from us or to force a
refinancing. A default and acceleration under one debt instrument or other contract may also
trigger cross-acceleration under other debt instruments or other agreements, if any. An event of
default, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us because the lenders
will be able to accelerate all outstanding amounts under the loan or foreclose on the collateral
(which consists primarily of the assets of our H3C segment and could involve the lenders taking
control over our H3C segment). Any of these actions would likely result in a material adverse
effect on our business and financial condition.
An adverse change in the interest rates for our borrowings could adversely affect our financial
condition.
Interest to be paid by us on our senior secured loan is at an interest rate based on the LIBOR
rate, plus an applicable margin. The published LIBOR rate is subject to change on a periodic
basis. Recently, interest rates have trended upwards in major global financial markets. If these
interest rate trends continue, this will result in increased interest rate expense as a result of
higher LIBOR rates. Continued increases in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, particularly if such increases are
substantial. In addition, interest rate trends could affect global economic conditions.
29
Rating downgrades may make it more expensive for us to refinance our debt or borrow money.
Moodys Investors Service has assigned a Ba2 rating to our senior secured loans at H3C and a Ba2
corporate family rating (stable outlook) to H3C Holdings Limited, the borrower. Standard & Poors
Ratings Services assigned these loans a BB rating (with a recovery rating of 1) and assigned a
BB- corporate credit rating (stable outlook) to H3C Holdings Limited. We are required to maintain
a rating from each of these agencies during the term of the loan. These credit ratings are subject
to change at the discretion of the rating agencies. If our credit ratings are downgraded, it would
likely make it more expensive for us to refinance our existing loan or raise additional capital in
the future. Such refinancing or capital raising may be on terms that may not be acceptable to us
or otherwise not available. Any future adverse rating agency actions with respect to our ratings
could have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities, our ability to compete for new
business and our ability to access capital markets.
Risks Related to H3C Segment and Dependence Thereon
We are significantly dependent on our H3C segment; if H3C is not successful we will likely
experience a material adverse impact to our business, business prospects and operating results.
For the quarter ended November 30, 2007, H3C accounted for approximately 58 percent of our
consolidated revenue and approximately 66 percent of our consolidated gross profit. H3C, which is
domiciled in Hong Kong and has its principal operations in Hangzhou, China, is subject to all of
the operational risks that normally arise for a technology company with global operations,
including risks relating to research and development, manufacturing, sales, service, marketing, and
corporate functions. Furthermore, H3C may not be successful in selling directly to Chinese
customers, particularly those in the public sector, to the extent that such customers favor
Chinese-owned competitors. Given the significance of H3C to our financial results, if H3C is not
successful, our business will likely be adversely affected.
Sales from our H3C segment, and therefore in China, constitute a material portion of our total
sales, and our business, financial condition and results of operations will to a significant degree
be subject to economic, political and social events in the PRC.
Our sales are significantly dependent on China, with approximately 45 percent of our consolidated
revenues attributable to sales in China for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2007. We expect
that a significant portion of our sales will continue to be derived from China for the foreseeable
future. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations are to a
significant degree subject to economic, political, legal and social developments and other events
in China and surrounding areas. We discuss risks related to the PRC in further detail below.
Our H3C segment is dependent on Huawei Technologies in several material respects, including as an
important customer; should Huawei reduce its business with H3C, our business will likely be
materially adversely affected.
H3C derives a material portion of its sales from Huawei. In the three months ended November 30,
2007, Huawei accounted for approximately 28 percent of the revenue for our H3C segment and
approximately 16 percent of our consolidated revenue. Huawei has no minimum purchase obligations
with respect to H3C. Should Huawei reduce its business with H3C, H3Cs sales will suffer. On
March 29, 2007 we acquired Huaweis 49 percent interest in H3C for $882 million, giving us 100
percent ownership of H3C. Since Huawei is no longer an owner of H3C, it is possible that over time
Huawei will purchase fewer products and services from H3C. We will need to continue to provide
Huawei with products and services that satisfy its needs or we risk the possibility that it sources
products from another vendor or internally develops these products. Further, we have and expect to
continue to incur costs relating to transition matters with respect to support that Huawei
previously provided for H3C when it was a shareholder. In addition, our China headquarters in
Hangzhou, PRC is owned by Huawei and leased to us under a lease agreement that expires in December
2008; if we cannot renew this lease on terms favorable to us or find alternate facilities, we may
suffer disruption in our H3C business. If any of the above risks occur, it will likely have an
adverse impact on H3Cs sales and business performance.
30
We must execute on a global strategy to leverage the benefits of our H3C acquisition, including
integration activities we determine to undertake; if we are not successful in these efforts, our
business will suffer.
Our H3C acquisition presents unique challenges that we must address. We must successfully execute
on managing our four business segments, and, to the extent we so choose, integrating these
businesses, in order to fully benefit from this acquisition. As a joint venture owned by two
separate companies, H3C historically operated in many ways independently from 3Com and Huawei.
H3Cs business is largely based in the PRC and therefore significant cultural, language, business
process and other differences exist between our other segments and H3C. In order to more closely
manage and, to the extent we choose, integrate H3C, we expect to incur significant transition
costs, including management retention costs and other related items. There may also be business
disruption as management and other personnel focus on global management activities and integration
matters.
In order to realize the full benefits of this acquisition, we will need to manage our four business
segments and employ strategies to leverage H3C. These efforts will require significant time and
attention of management and other key employees at 3Com and H3C. Depending on the decisions we
make on various strategic alternatives available to us, we may develop new or adjusted global
design and development initiatives, go-to-market strategies, branding tactics, unified back office,
supply chain and IT systems, or other strategies that take advantage and leverage H3Cs and our
other segments respective strengths. If we are not successful at transitioning effectively to full
ownership of H3C, or if we do not execute on a global strategy that enables us to leverage the
benefits of this acquisition, our business will be substantially harmed.
Risks Related to Personnel
Our success is dependent on continuing to hire and retain qualified managers and other personnel,
including at our H3C segment, and reducing senior management turnover in our other segments; if we
are not successful in attracting and retaining these personnel, our business will suffer.
Competition for qualified employees is intense. If we fail to attract, hire, or retain qualified
personnel, our business will be harmed. We have experienced significant turnover in our senior
management team in the last several years and we may continue to experience change at this level.
If we cannot retain qualified senior managers, our business may not succeed.
The senior management team at H3C has been highly effective since H3Cs inception in 2003. We need
to continue to incentivize and retain H3C management. We cannot be sure that we will be successful
in these efforts. If we are not successful, our H3C business may suffer, which, in turn, will have
a material adverse impact on our consolidated business. Many of these senior managers, and other
key H3C employees, originally worked for Huawei prior to the inception of H3C. Subject to
non-competition agreements with us (if applicable), these employees could return to work for Huawei
at any time. Huawei is not subject to any non-solicitation obligations in respect of H3C or 3Com.
Further, former Huawei employees that work for H3C may retain financial interests in Huawei.
Risks Related to Competition
If we do not respond effectively to increased competition caused by industry volatility and
consolidation our business could be harmed.
Our business could be seriously harmed if we do not compete effectively. We face competitive
challenges that are likely to arise from a number of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
industry volatility resulting from rapid product development cycles; |
|
|
|
|
increasing price competition due to maturation of basic networking technologies; |
|
|
|
|
industry consolidation resulting in competitors with greater financial, marketing, and
technical resources; and |
|
|
|
|
the presence of existing competitors with greater financial resources together with the
potential emergence of new competitors with lower cost structures and more competitive
offerings. |
31
Our competition with Huawei in the enterprise networking market could have a material adverse
effect on our sales and our results of operations; and after a contractual non-compete period
expires, Huawei can increase its level of competition, which would likely materially and adversely
affect our business.
As Huawei expands its international operations, there could be increasing instances where we
compete directly with Huawei in the enterprise networking market. As an OEM customer of H3C,
Huawei has had, and continues to have, access to H3Cs products for resale. This access enhances
Huaweis current ability to compete directly with us. We could lose a competitive advantage in
markets where we compete with Huawei, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our
sales and overall results of operations. In addition, Huaweis obligation not to offer or sell
enterprise class, and small-to-medium size business (or SMB), routers and switches that are
competitive with H3Cs products continues until September 29, 2008. After that date, we are
subject to the risk of increased competition from Huawei, which could materially harm our results
of operations. More specifically, after the non-compete period expires, Huawei may offer and sell
its own enterprise or SMB routers and switches, or resell products that it sources from our
competitors. Huawei is not prohibited from developing (but not offering or selling) competing
products during the non-compete period. Huawei is also not prohibited from currently selling
products in ancillary areassuch as security, voice over internet protocol and storage
productsthat are also sold today by H3C.
Huaweis incentive not to compete with H3C or us, and its incentive to assist H3C, may diminish now
that Huawei does not own any interest in H3C. In addition, Huawei maintains a strong presence
within China and the Asia Pacific region and has significant resources with which to compete within
the networking industry, including the assets of Harbour Networks, a China-based competitor of H3C.
We cannot predict whether Huawei will compete with us. If competition from Huawei increases, our
business will likely suffer.
Finally, if any of H3Cs senior managers, and other key H3C employees that originally worked for
Huawei prior to the inception of H3C, return to work for Huawei, the competitive risks discussed
above may be heightened. Subject to non-competition agreements with us (if applicable), these
employees could return to work for Huawei at any time. Huawei is not subject to any
non-solicitation obligations in respect of H3C or 3Com. Further, former Huawei employees that work
for H3C may retain financial interests in Huawei.
Risks Related to Business and Technology Strategy
We may not be successful at identifying and responding to new and emerging market and product
opportunities, or at responding quickly enough to technologies or markets that are in decline.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid technology transitions and short product
life cycles. Therefore, our success depends on our ability to do the following:
|
|
|
identify new market and product opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
predict which technologies and markets will see declining demand; |
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products and solutions in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
gain market acceptance of new products and solutions, particularly in targeted emerging
markets; and |
|
|
|
|
rapidly and efficiently transition our customers from older to newer enterprise
networking technologies. |
Our financial position or results of operations could suffer if we are not successful in achieving
these goals. For example, our business would suffer if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
there is a delay in introducing new products; |
|
|
|
|
we lose certain channels of distribution or key partners; |
|
|
|
|
our products do not satisfy customers in terms of features, functionality or quality; or |
|
|
|
|
our products cost more to produce than we expect. |
Because we will continue to rely on original design manufacturers to assist in product design of
some of our products, we may not be able to respond to emerging technology trends through the
design and production of new products as well as if we were working independently.
32
We expect to utilize strategic relationships and other alliances as key elements in our strategy.
If we are not successful in forming desired ventures and alliances or if such ventures and
alliances are not successful, our ability to achieve our growth and profitability goals could be
adversely affected.
We have announced alliances with third parties, such as IBM and Trapeze Networks. In the future,
we expect to evaluate other possible strategic relationships, including joint ventures and other
types of alliances, and we may increase our reliance on such strategic relationships to broaden our
sales channels, complement internal development of new technologies and enhancement of existing
products, and exploit perceived market opportunities.
If we fail to form the number and quality of strategic relationships that we desire, or if such
strategic relationships are not successful, we could suffer missed market opportunities, channel
conflicts, delays in product development or delivery, or other operational difficulties. Further,
if third parties acquire our strategic partners or if our competitors enter into successful
strategic relationships, we may face increased competition. Any of these difficulties could have
an adverse effect on our future sales and results of operations.
Our strategy of outsourcing functions and operations may fail to reduce cost and may disrupt our
operations.
We continue to look for ways to decrease cost and improve efficiency by contracting with other
companies to perform functions or operations that, in the past, we have performed ourselves. We
have outsourced the majority of our manufacturing and logistics for our non H3C products. We now
rely on outside vendors to meet the majority of our manufacturing needs as well as a significant
portion of our IT needs for the non-H3C segments. Additionally, we outsource certain functions for
technical support and product return services. We have recently transitioned our outsourced
customer service and support functions from a single vendor to a combination of vendors
complemented by internal sources. If we do not provide our customers with a high quality of
service, we risk losing customers and/or increasing our support costs. To achieve future cost
savings or operational benefits, we may expand our outsourcing activities to cover additional
services which we believe a third party may be able to provide in a more efficient or effective
manner than we could do internally ourselves.
Although we believe that outsourcing will result in lower costs and increased efficiencies, this
may not be the case. Because these third parties may not be as responsive to our needs as we would
be ourselves, outsourcing increases the risk of disruption to our operations. In addition, our
agreements with these third parties sometimes include substantial penalties for terminating such
agreements early or failing to maintain minimum service levels. Because we cannot always predict
how long we will need the services or how much of the services we will use, we may have to pay
these penalties or incur costs if our business conditions change.
Our reliance on industry standards, technological change in the marketplace, and new product
initiatives may cause our sales to fluctuate or decline.
The enterprise networking industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid changes in
technology and customer requirements and evolving industry standards. As a result, our success
depends on:
|
|
|
the convergence of technologies, such as voice, data and video on single, secure
networks; |
|
|
|
|
the timely adoption and market acceptance of industry standards, and timely resolution
of conflicting U.S. and international industry standards; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to influence the development of emerging industry standards and to introduce
new and enhanced products that are compatible with such standards. |
Slow market acceptance of new technologies, products, or industry standards could adversely affect
our sales or overall results of operations. In addition, if our technology is not included in an
industry standard on a timely basis or if we fail to achieve timely certification of compliance to
industry standards for our products, our sales of such products or our overall results of
operations could be adversely affected.
33
We focus on enterprise networking, and our results of operations may fluctuate based on factors
related entirely to conditions in this market.
Our focus on enterprise networking may cause increased sensitivity to the business risks associated
specifically with the enterprise networking market and our ability to execute successfully on our
strategies to provide superior solutions for larger and multi-site enterprise environments. To be
successful in the enterprise networking market, we will need to be perceived by decision making
officers of large enterprises as committed for the long-term to the high-end networking business.
Also, expansion of sales to large enterprises may be disruptive in a variety of ways, such as
adding larger systems integrators that may raise channel conflict issues with existing
distributors, or a perception of diminished focus on the small and medium enterprise market.
Risks Related to Operations and Distribution Channels
A significant portion of our DVBU and TippingPoint sales are derived from a small number of
distributors. If any of these partners reduces its business with us, our business could be
seriously harmed.
We distribute many of our products through two-tier distribution channels that include
distributors, systems integrators and value added resellers, or VARs. A significant portion of our
sales is concentrated among a few distributors; our two largest distributors accounted for a
combined 17 percent of our consolidated revenue for the three months ended November 30, 2007. If
either of these distributors reduces its business with us, our sales and overall results of
operations could be adversely affected.
We depend on distributors who maintain inventories of our products. If the distributors reduce
their inventories of our products, our sales could be adversely affected.
We work closely with our distributors to monitor channel inventory levels and ensure that
appropriate levels of products are available to resellers and end users. Our target range for
channel inventory levels is between three and five weeks of supply on hand at our distributors.
Partners with a below-average inventory level may incur stock outs that would adversely impact
our sales. Our distribution agreements typically provide that our distributors may cancel their
orders on short notice with little or no penalty. If our channel partners reduce their levels of
inventory of our products, our sales would be negatively impacted during the period of change.
If we are unable to successfully develop relationships with system integrators, service providers,
and enterprise VARs, our sales may be negatively affected.
As part of our sales strategy, we are targeting system integrators, or SIs, service providers, or
SPs, and enterprise value-added resellers, or eVARs. In addition to specialized technical
expertise, SIs, SPs and eVARs typically offer sophisticated services capabilities that are
frequently desired by larger enterprise customers. In order to expand our distribution channel to
include resellers with such capabilities, we must be able to provide effective support to these
resellers. If our sales, marketing or services capabilities are not sufficiently robust to provide
effective support to such SIs, SPs, and eVARs, we may not be successful in expanding our
distribution model and current SI, SP, and eVAR partners may terminate their relationships with us,
which would adversely impact our sales and overall results of operations.
We may pursue acquisitions of other companies that, if not successful, could adversely affect our
business, financial position and results of operations.
In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of companies to enhance our existing capabilities. There
can be no assurances that acquisitions that we might consummate will be successful. If we pursue
an acquisition but are not successful in completing it, or if we complete an acquisition but are
not successful in integrating the acquired companys technology, employees, products or operations
successfully, our business, financial position or results of operations could be adversely
affected.
34
We may be unable to manage our supply chain successfully, which would adversely impact our sales,
gross margin and profitability.
Current business conditions and operational challenges in managing our supply chain affect our
business in a number of ways:
|
|
|
in the past, some key components have had limited availability; |
|
|
|
|
as integration of networking features on a reduced number of computer chips continues,
we are increasingly facing competition from parties who are our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast demand is diminished; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on, and long-term arrangements with, third-party manufacturers places much
of the supply chain process out of our direct control and heightens the need for accurate
forecasting and reduces our ability to transition quickly to alternative supply chain
strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
we may experience disruptions to our logistics. |
Some of our suppliers are also our competitors. We cannot be certain that in the future our
suppliers, particularly those who are also in active competition with us, will be able or willing
to meet our demand for components in a timely and cost-effective manner.
There has been a trend toward consolidation of vendors of electronic components. Our reliance on a
smaller number of vendors and the inability to quickly switch vendors increases the risk of
logistics disruptions, unfavorable price fluctuations, or disruptions in supply, particularly in a
supply-constrained environment.
Supplies of certain key components have become tighter as industry demand for such components has
increased. If the resulting increase in component costs and time necessary to obtain these
components persists, we may experience an adverse impact to gross margin.
If overall demand for our products or the mix of demand for our products is significantly different
from our expectations, we may face inadequate or excess component supply or inadequate or excess
manufacturing capacity. This would result in orders for products that could not be manufactured in
a timely manner, or a buildup of inventory that could not easily be sold. Either of these
situations could adversely affect our market share, sales, and results of operations or financial
position.
Our strategies to outsource the majority of our manufacturing requirements to contract
manufacturers may not result in meeting our cost, quality or performance standards. The inability
of any contract manufacturer to meet our cost, quality or performance standards could adversely
affect our sales and overall results from operations.
The cost, quality, performance, and availability of contract manufacturing operations are and will
be essential to the successful production and sale of many of our products. We may not be able to
provide contract manufacturers with product volumes that are high enough to achieve sufficient cost
savings. If shipments fall below forecasted levels, we may incur increased costs or be required to
take ownership of inventory. In addition, a significant component of maintaining cost
competitiveness is the ability of our contract manufacturers to adjust their own costs and
manufacturing infrastructure to compensate for possible adverse exchange rate movements. To the
extent that the contract manufacturers are unable to do so, and we are unable to procure
alternative product supplies, then our own competitiveness and results of operations could be
adversely impacted.
In portions of our business we have implemented a program with our manufacturing partners to ship
products directly from regional shipping centers to customers. Through this program, we are
relying on these partners to fill customer orders in a timely manner. This program may not yield
the efficiencies that we expect, which would negatively impact our results of operations. Any
disruptions to on-time delivery to customers would adversely impact our sales and overall results
of operations.
35
If we fail to adequately evolve our financial and managerial control and reporting systems and
processes, including the management of our H3C segment, our ability to manage and grow our business
will be negatively affected.
Our ability to successfully offer our products and implement our business plan in a rapidly
evolving market depends upon an effective planning and management process. We will need to
continue to improve our financial and managerial control and our reporting systems and procedures
in order to manage our business effectively in the future. If we fail to implement improved
systems and processes, our ability to manage our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected. For example, now that we own all of H3C, we are spending additional time,
resources and capital to manage its business, operations and financial results. If we are not able
to successfully manage H3C, our business results could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Operations in the Peoples Republic of China
Chinas governmental and regulatory reforms and changing economic environment may impact our
ability to do business in China.
As a result of the historic reforms of the past several decades, multiple government bodies are
involved in regulating and administrating affairs in the enterprise networking industry in China.
These government agencies have broad discretion and authority over all aspects of the networking,
telecommunications and information technology industry in China; accordingly their decisions may
impact our ability to do business in China. Any of the following changes in Chinas political and
economic conditions and governmental policies could have a substantial impact on our business:
|
|
|
the promulgation of new laws and regulations and the interpretation of those laws and
regulations; |
|
|
|
|
enforcement and application of rules and regulations by the Chinese government; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of measures to control inflation or stimulate growth; or |
|
|
|
|
any actions that limit our ability to develop, manufacture, import or sell our products
in China, or to finance and operate our business in China. |
If Chinas entry into the World Trade Organization, or the WTO, results in increased competition or
has a negative impact on Chinas economy, our business could suffer. Since early 2004, the Chinese
government has implemented certain measures to control the pace of economic growth. Such measures
may cause a decrease in the level of economic activity in China, which in turn could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal system may adversely affect us.
We conduct our business in China primarily through H3C, a Hong Kong entity which in turn owns
several Chinese entities. These entities are generally subject to laws and regulations applicable
to foreign investment in China. In addition, there are uncertainties regarding the interpretation
and enforcement of laws, rules and policies in China. Because many laws and regulations are
relatively new and the Chinese legal system is still evolving, the interpretations of many laws,
regulations and rules are not always uniform. Moreover, the interpretation of statutes and
regulations may be subject to government policies reflecting domestic political changes. Finally,
enforcement of existing laws or contracts based on existing law may be uncertain, and it may be
difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement, or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a
court of another jurisdiction. Any litigation in China may be protracted and result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources and managements attention.
If PRC tax benefits available to H3C are reduced or repealed, our business could suffer.
If the PRC government changes, removes or withdraws any of the tax benefits currently enjoyed by
our H3C segment, it will likely adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow. For
example, H3C enjoys preferential income tax rates due to its status as a high technology enterprise
headquartered within a high tech zone in Hangzhou, PRC. In March 2007 the Peoples National
Congress in the PRC approved a new tax reform law, effective on January 1, 2008, the broad
intention of which is to align the tax regime applicable to foreign owned Chinese enterprises with
that applicable to domestically-owned Chinese enterprises. If applicable to H3C, the effect of this
new law would be to increase the statutory income tax rate for H3C in the PRC. The new law,
however, provides for a reduced rate of corporate income tax for certain high-tech enterprises.
While we are currently confirming H3Cs status as a high-tech enterprise under applicable
regulations, we currently believe that H3C will in fact qualify as a high-tech enterprise and
therefore be entitled to maintain its existing tax concessions.
36
If H3C is not entitled to high-tech enterprise treatment under this new law (due to the
publication of new regulations or the interpretation of existing law or regulation), if other tax
benefits currently enjoyed by H3C are withdrawn or reduced, or if new taxes are introduced which
have not applied to H3C before, there would likely be a resulting increase to H3Cs statutory tax
rates in the PRC. Increases to tax rates in the PRC, where our H3C segment is profitable, could
adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
H3C is subject to restrictions on paying dividends and making other payments to us.
Chinese regulations currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits, as
determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. H3C does business
primarily through a Chinese entity that is required to set aside a portion of its after-tax profits
currently 10 percent according to Chinese accounting standards and regulations to fund certain
reserves. The Chinese government also imposes controls on the conversion of Renminbi into foreign
currencies and the remittance of currencies out of China. We may experience difficulties in
completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. These
restrictions may in the future limit our ability to receive dividends or repatriate funds from H3C.
In addition, the credit agreement governing our senior secured loan also imposes significant
restrictions on H3Cs ability to dividend or make other payments to our other segments. Finally, a
new PRC law, effective January 1, 2008, imposes a withholding tax on certain payments by entities
resident in PRC to entities outside of the PRC (including Hong Kong). The PRC Ministry of Finance
has not yet issued final guidance on whether this new withholding tax will apply to dividends. If
the withholding tax does apply to dividends, all dividends from H3Cs PRC subsidiaries to our H3C
subsidiary in Hong Kong will be subject to this withholding tax at a rate of 5%. H3Cs main PRC
subsidiary generates the cash used to pay principal and interest on our H3C loan (through dividend
flows from the PRC to Hong Kong and then to the Cayman Islands). Accordingly, if this law does
apply to dividends it would require us to earn proportionately higher profits in the PRC to service
principal and interest on our loan, or force us to fund any deficiencies from cash in our other
segments (which do not have positive cash flow from operations).
We are subject to risks relating to currency rate fluctuations and exchange controls and we do not
hedge this risk in China.
A significant portion of our sales and a portion of our costs are made in China and denominated in
Renminbi. At the same time, our senior secured bank loan which we intend to service and repay
primarily through cash flow from H3Cs PRC operations is denominated in US dollars. In July
2005, China uncoupled the Renminbi from the U.S. dollar and let it float in a narrow band against a
basket of foreign currencies. The move initially revalued the Renminbi by 2.1 percent against the
U.S. dollar; however, it is uncertain what further adjustments may be made in the future. The
Renminbi-U.S. dollar exchange rate could float, and the Renminbi could appreciate or depreciate
relative to the U.S. dollar. Any movement of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our
cash flows, revenues, operating results and financial position, and may make it more difficult for
us to service our U.S. dollar-denominated senior secured bank loan. We do not currently hedge the
currency risk in H3C through foreign exchange forward contracts or otherwise and China employs
currency controls restricting Renminbi conversion, limiting our ability to engage in currency
hedging activities in China. Various foreign exchange controls are applicable to us in China, and
such restrictions may in the future make it difficult for H3C or us to repatriate earnings, which
could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and financial position.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If our products contain undetected software or hardware errors, we could incur significant
unexpected expenses and could lose sales.
High technology products sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products
or new versions or updates of existing products are released to the marketplace. Undetected errors
could result in higher than expected warranty and service costs and expenses, and the recording of
an accrual for related anticipated expenses. From time to time, such errors or component failures
could be found in new or existing products after the commencement of commercial shipments. These
problems may have a material adverse effect on our business by causing us to incur significant
warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of our engineering personnel from new product
development efforts, delaying the recognition of revenue and causing significant customer relations
problems. Further, if products are not accepted by customers due to such defects, and such returns
exceed the amount we accrued for defect returns based on our historical experience, our operating
results would be adversely affected.
37
Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As a result, when
problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. The
occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether or not caused by our products, could result in
the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and any necessary revisions may cause us to
incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems would likely have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We may need to engage in complex and costly litigation in order to protect, maintain or enforce our
intellectual property rights; in some jurisdictions, such as China, our rights may not be as strong
as the rights we enjoy in the U.S.
Whether we are defending the assertion of intellectual property rights against us, or asserting our
intellectual property rights against others, intellectual property litigation can be complex,
costly, protracted, and highly disruptive to business operations because it may divert the
attention and energies of management and key technical personnel. Further, plaintiffs in
intellectual property cases often seek injunctive relief and the measures of damages in
intellectual property litigation are complex and often subjective and uncertain. In addition, such
litigation may subject us to counterclaims or other retaliatory actions that could increase its
costs, complexity, uncertainty and disruption to the business. Thus, the existence of this type of
litigation, or any adverse determinations related to such litigation, could subject us to
significant liabilities and costs. Any one of these factors could adversely affect our sales, gross
margin, overall results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
In addition, the legal systems of many foreign countries do not protect or honor intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the legal system of the United States. For example, in
China, the legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are still
in the development stage. It may be very difficult, time-consuming and costly for us to attempt to
enforce our intellectual property rights, and those of H3C, in these jurisdictions.
We may not be able to defend ourselves successfully against claims that we are infringing the
intellectual property rights of others.
Many of our competitors, such as telecommunications, networking, and computer equipment
manufacturers, have large intellectual property portfolios, including patents that may cover
technologies that are relevant to our business. In addition, many smaller companies, universities,
and individual inventors have obtained or applied for patents in areas of technology that may
relate to our business. The industry continues to be aggressive in assertion, licensing, and
litigation of patents and other intellectual property rights.
In the course of our business, we receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of
potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We
evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in
each case whether to negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the proprietary
technologies, protocols, or specifications in our products, and whether we have rights of
indemnification against our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors. If we are unable to obtain
and maintain licenses on favorable terms for intellectual property rights required for the
manufacture, sale, and use of our products, particularly those that must comply with industry
standard protocols and specifications to be commercially viable, our financial position or results
of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are alleged to infringe the
intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to seek licenses from others or be
prevented from manufacturing or selling our products, which could cause disruptions to our
operations or the markets in which we compete. Finally, even if we have indemnification rights in
respect of such allegations of infringement from our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors, we
may not be able to recover our losses under those indemnity rights.
OSN, our new open source strategy, subjects us to additional intellectual property risks, such as
less control over development of certain technology that forms a part of this strategy and a higher
likelihood of litigation.
We recently announced Open Services Networking, or OSN, a new networking strategy that uses open
source software, or OSS, licenses. The underlying source code for OSS is generally made available
to the general public with either relaxed or no intellectual property restrictions. This allows
users to create user-generated software content through either incremental individual effort, or
collaboration. The use of OSS means that for such software we do not exercise control over many
aspects of the development of the open source technology. For example, the vast majority of
programmers developing OSS used by us are neither our employees nor contractors. Therefore, we
cannot predict whether further developments and enhancements to OSS selected by us would be
available. Furthermore, rival OSS applications often compete for market share. Should our choice
of application fail to compete favorably, its OSS development may wane or stop. In addition, OSS
has few technological barriers to entry by new competitors and it may be relatively easy for new
competitors, who have
38
greater resources than us, to enter our markets and compete with us. Also,
because OSS is often compiled from multiple
components developed by numerous independent parties and usually comes as is and without
indemnification, OSS is more vulnerable to third party intellectual property infringement claims.
Finally, some of the more prominent OSS licenses, such as the GNU General Public License, are the
subject of litigation. It is possible that a court could hold such licenses to be unenforceable or
someone could assert a claim for proprietary rights in a program developed and distributed under
them. Any ruling by a court that these licenses are not enforceable or that open source components
of our product offerings may not be liberally copied, modified or distributed may have the effect
of preventing us from selling or developing all or a portion of our products. If any of the
foregoing occurred, it could cause a material adverse impact on our business.
Risks Related to the Trading Market
Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to volatility in the market
price of our stock.
Historically, our stock price has experienced volatility. We expect that our stock price may
continue to experience volatility in the future due to a variety of potential factors such as:
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash and equivalents and short term investment balances; |
|
|
|
|
variations between our actual financial results and published analysts expectations;
and |
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors. |
In addition, over the past several years, the stock market has experienced significant price and
volume fluctuations that have affected the stock prices of many technology companies. These
factors, as well as general economic and political conditions or investors concerns regarding the
credibility of corporate financial statements and the accounting profession, may have a material
adverse affect on the market price of our stock in the future.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock, including shares returned to satisfy
employee tax withholding obligations, in the three months ended November 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
September 1, 2007
through September
28, 2007 |
|
|
277,808 |
(1) |
|
$ |
3.62 |
|
September 29, 2007
through October 26,
2007 |
|
|
5,620 |
(1) |
|
|
4.88 |
|
October 27, 2007
through November
30, 2007 |
|
|
22,462 |
(1) |
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
305,890 |
|
|
$ |
3.73 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares returned to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon the
vesting of restricted stock awards. |
39
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) |
|
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on September 26, 2007. |
|
(b) |
|
Each of the persons named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee for
director was elected and the proposals listed below were approved. The
following are the voting results of the proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal I |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
Election of Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Y. L. Mao |
|
|
303,534,532 |
|
|
|
19,840,179 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Edgar Masri |
|
|
309,705,357 |
|
|
|
13,669,354 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Dominique Trempont |
|
|
310,547,591 |
|
|
|
12,827,121 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Other Directors whose term of office as a director continued after the meeting were
Eric A. Benhamou, Gary T. DiCamillo, James R. Long and Raj Reddy. Paul Yovovich was
a director whose term of office did not continue after the meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal II |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
To ratify the
appointment of
Deloitte & Touche
LLP as our
registered
independent public
accounting firm for
the fiscal year
ending May 30,
2008: |
|
|
319,634,949 |
|
|
|
3,251,724 |
|
|
|
488,037 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Bonus Determination for Departed Named Executive Officer.
On January 8, 2008, the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors of
the Company approved a bonus payment of $35,430 for the first half of fiscal 2008 for Donald M.
Halsted, the Companys former Chief Financial Officer who was named in our last proxy statement as
a named executive officer. The Committee approved the bonus payment after considering 3Coms
performance during the first half of fiscal 2008, the level of achievement of
previously-established metrics, current market conditions and the performance of the individual
officer. Mr. Halsteds award was pro-rated based on time worked at 3Com during the period.
Bonus Criteria Dr. Shusheng Zheng.
On January 8, 2008, the Committee approved the following financial metrics and other criteria to
determine cash bonuses for Dr. Shusheng Zheng, our H3C segments Chief Operating Officer.
Dr. Zhengs target annual bonus opportunity described in his employment agreement will be split
equally between (1) 3Com consolidated metrics (which are paid semi-annually and as to which the
metrics were set for the second half of fiscal 2008) and (2) H3C segment metrics (which are paid
annually under the H3C Cash Incentive Bonus Program for H3Cs calendar fiscal years and as to which
the metrics were set for the 2008 fiscal year).
|
|
|
3Com Consolidated Metrics (50% of total opportunity). The Committee set the following
financial goals, each of which can be met individually and independent of attainment of
other metrics (the weighting of each metric is in parens): |
|
|
|
3Com consolidated revenue (33-1/3%) |
|
|
|
|
3Com consolidated non-GAAP operating profit (33-1/3%) and |
|
|
|
|
3Com consolidated cash from operations (33-1/3%). |
|
|
|
For each metric described above, the Committee set goals for bonus at
three levels: |
|
|
|
threshold (the achievement of which will result in a bonus opportunity
amount of 50% of the target 3Com consolidated portion of the total bonus
amount); |
|
|
|
|
target (the achievement of which will result in a bonus opportunity
amount of 100% of the target 3Com consolidated portion of the total bonus
amount); and |
|
|
|
|
maximum (the achievement of which will result in a bonus opportunity
amount of 200% of the target 3Com consolidated portion of the total bonus
amount). |
|
|
|
H3C Segment Metrics (50% of total opportunity). The Committee set the following
financial goals, each of which can be met individually and independent of attainment of
other metrics (the weighting of each metric is in parens): |
|
|
|
H3C segment revenue (33-1/3%) |
|
|
|
|
H3C segment non-GAAP operating profit (33-1/3%) and |
|
|
|
|
H3C segment cash from operations (33-1/3%). |
|
|
|
For each metric described above, the Committee set goals for bonus at
four levels: |
|
|
|
threshold (the achievement of which will result in a bonus opportunity
amount of 50% of the target H3C segment portion of the total bonus amount); |
|
|
|
|
first level target (the achievement of which will result in a bonus
opportunity amount of 64% of the target H3C segment portion of the total
bonus amount); |
|
|
|
|
second level target (the achievement of which will result in a bonus
opportunity amount of 100% of the target H3C segment portion of the total
bonus amount); |
|
|
|
|
maximum (the achievement of which will result in a bonus opportunity
amount of 200% of the target H3C segment portion of the total bonus
amount).
|
|
|
|
The actual bonus opportunity amount will be based on a sliding scale for achievement
attained in between specified levels, although for any single metric no amount will count
towards the bonus opportunity unless, at a minimum, the threshold achievement level is
attained for that metric. |
|
|
|
|
After the bonus opportunity amount is calculated under the methodology set forth above,
the Committee, in its discretion, may adjust the amount up or down by up to 25% based on
the Committees evaluation of performance during the period against criteria established by
the Committee. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
2.1
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999
|
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.
|
|
8-K |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among
3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005
|
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.,
Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of
December 22, 2006
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
among
3Com Corporation, Diamond II Holdings Inc.
and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated
September 28, 2007
|
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to
correct an error in the Certificate of
Merger
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on March
23, 2005
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3/28/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A
Participating Preferred Stock
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002 (Rights Agreement)
|
|
8-A/A |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated
as of September 28, 2007
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 3Com Corporation 1984
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and
Restated as of September 26, 2007)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Com Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
Dated: January 9, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Jay Zager
|
|
|
|
Jay Zager |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer and a duly authorized
officer of the registrant) |
|
42
EXHIBIT LIST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
2.1
|
|
Master Separation and Distribution
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters
Agreement between the Registrant and Palm,
Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
December 13, 2004, by and among the
Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation
and TippingPoint Technologies, Inc.
|
|
8-K |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among
3Com Corporation, 3Com Technologies, Huawei
Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of
October 28, 2005
|
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between
Shenzhen Huawei Investment & Holding Co.,
Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of
December 22, 2006
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
3Com Corporation, Diamond II Holdings Inc.
and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated
September 28, 2007
|
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to
correct an error in the Certificate of
Merger
|
|
10-Q
|
|
002-92053
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on March
23, 2005
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3/28/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A
Participating Preferred Stock
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares
Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4,
2002 (Rights Agreement)
|
|
8-A/A |
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated
as of September 28, 2007
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-12867
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 3Com Corporation 1984
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and
Restated as of September 26, 2007)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan |
43