e10qsb
Table of Contents

 
 
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-QSB
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2007
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     
Commission file number 000-30489
LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
COLORADO   90-0224471
     
(State or other jurisdiction of   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    
6400 S. Fiddler’s Green Circle, Suite 1970 Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
(Address of principal executive offices)
(720) 488-1711
(Registrant’s telephone number)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ      No o
Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o      No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of May 7, 2007 was 22,118,034.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o      No þ
 
 


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 10-QSB contains certain “forward-looking statements” (as such term is defined in section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). These statements, which involve risks and uncertainties, reflect our current expectations, intentions or strategies regarding our possible future results of operations, performance, and achievements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation: statements regarding future products or product development; statements regarding future selling, general and administrative costs and research and development spending; statements regarding our product development strategy; and statements regarding future capital expenditures and financing requirements. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable common law and SEC rules.
These forward-looking statements are identified in this report by using words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “should” and similar terms and expressions, including references to assumptions and strategies. These statements reflect our current beliefs and are based on information currently available to us. Accordingly, these statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and contingencies, which could cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such statements.
The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:
  Our short operating history and lack of significant revenues from operations;
 
  Our dependence on a single product for our revenue;
 
  Our ability to successfully expand our operations and manage our future growth;
 
  The effect of current and future government regulations and regulators on our business;
 
  The effect of unfavorable publicity on our business;
 
  Competition in the dietary supplement market;
 
  The potential for product liability claims against us;
 
  Our dependence on third party manufacturers to manufacture our product;
 
  The ability to obtain raw material for our product;
 
  Our ability to protect our intellectual property rights and the value of our product;
 
  Our ability to continue to innovate and provide products that are useful to consumers;
 
  The significant control that our management and significant shareholders exercise over us;
 
  The illiquidity of our common stock;
 
  Our ability to access capital markets or other adverse effects to our business and financial position;
 
  Our inability to generate sufficient cash from operations or raise financing to satisfy our liquidity requirements. Measures have been initiated to reduce cash outflows. There is, however, no assurance that these actions will be sufficient to satisfy liquidity requirements or that a reduction of scope will not harm our business, financial condition or operating results; and
 
  Other factors, including the other risks, uncertainties, and contingencies under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” in Item 6 of Part II of our report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2006.
When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in this report and the documents incorporated by reference. We have no obligation and do not undertake to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report.

2


 

LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION
INDEX
         
    PAGE
       
 
       
       
    4  
    5  
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    14  
 
       
    20  
 
       
    20  
 
       
    22  
 
       
Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
       
 Confidential Termination Agreement and General Release of Claims
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certification of PFO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906
 Certification of PFO Pursuant to Section 906

3


Table of Contents

PART I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006
                 
            (Audited)
    (Unaudited)   June 30, 2006
    March 31, 2007   (Restated*)
     
ASSETS
               
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 724,508     $ 228,112  
Marketable securities, available for sale
          3,008,573  
Accounts receivable, net
    389,916       107,892  
Inventory
    44,056       45,001  
Deferred expenses
    114,811       152,677  
Deposit with manufacturer
    414,912       555,301  
Prepaid expenses
    113,144       316,659  
     
Total current assets
    1,801,347       4,414,215  
 
               
Property and equipment, net
    130,626       245,000  
Intangible assets, net
    2,298,823       2,162,042  
Deposits
    320,440       316,621  
     
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 4,551,236     $ 7,137,878  
     
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 333,404     $ 613,833  
Accrued expenses
    403,916       399,305  
Deferred revenue
    802,958       1,144,950  
Capital lease obligations, current portion
    2,217       1,985  
     
Total current liabilities
    1,542,495       2,160,073  
 
               
Long-term liabilities
               
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
    1,453       3,146  
     
Total liabilities
    1,543,948       2,163,219  
     
Stockholders’ equity
               
Common stock, par value $.001, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 22,118,034 issued and outstanding
    22,118       22,118  
Additional paid-in capital
    15,163,056       14,018,487  
Accumulated (deficit)
    (12,177,886 )     (9,010,339 )
Unrealized (loss) on securities available for sale
          (55,607 )
     
Total stockholders’ equity
    3,007,288       4,974,659  
     
 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 4,551,236     $ 7,137,878  
     
*See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

4


Table of Contents

LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the nine months ended
    March 31,   March 31,
    2007   2006   2007   2006
     
Sales, net
  $ 995,274     $ 1,390,623     $ 4,207,518     $ 6,066,967  
Cost of sales
    213,529       296,089       838,244       1,255,691  
     
Gross profit
    781,745       1,094,534       3,369,274       4,811,276  
 
                               
Operating expenses:
                               
Marketing and customer service
    504,616       697,644       2,605,616       2,672,031  
General and administrative
    806,878       997,339       3,606,824       3,103,982  
Research and development
    57,318       48,276       195,654       48,276  
Depreciation and amortization
    16,622       68,526       76,636       238,289  
     
Total operating expenses
    1,385,434       1,811,785       6,484,730       6,062,578  
     
Operating (loss)
    (603,689 )     (717,251 )     (3,115,456 )     (1,251,302 )
 
                               
Other income and (expense):
                               
Interest income (expense)
    15,403       50,924       46,110       106,172  
Loss on disposal of assets
                (95,654 )      
Other (expense)
    5,953       (4,584 )     (2,547 )     (16,512 )
     
Net other income (expense)
    21,356       46,340       (52,091 )     89,660  
     
Net income (loss)
  $ (582,333 )   $ (670,911 )   $ (3,167,547 )   $ (1,161,642 )
     
Net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted
  $ (0.03 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.05 )
     
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and fully diluted
    22,118,034       22,117,992       22,118,034       22,117,992  
     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

5


Table of Contents

LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
                 
    For the nine months ended March 31,
    2007   2006
     
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
               
Net income (loss)
  $ (3,167,547 )   $ (1,161,642 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used) provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    76,636       238,289  
Loss on disposition of assets
    95,654       4,661  
Stock based compensation to employees
    1,109,869        
Stock based compensation to non-employees
    34,700       77,895  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable
    (282,024 )     759,805  
Decrease in inventory
    945       35,666  
Decrease in deferred expenses
    37,866        
Decrease in deposits to manufacturer
    140,389       405,497  
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid expenses
    203,515       (64,841 )
(Increase) in other assets
    (3,819 )     (264,952 )
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable
    (280,429 )     217,778  
Increase in accrued expenses
    4,611       174,092  
(Decrease)/increase in deferred revenue
    (341,992 )     993,750  
     
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities
    (2,371,626 )     1,415,998  
     
 
               
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Redemption of marketable securities
    3,064,180        
(Purchase) of intangible assets
    (136,781 )     (20,906 )
(Purchase) of equipment
    (57,916 )     (128,452 )
     
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities
    2,869,483       (149,358 )
     
 
               
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Proceeds from margin debt
    2,093,101        
Repayment on margin debt
    (2,093,101 )      
Principal payments under capital lease obligation
    (1,461 )     (717 )
     
Net Cash (Used) by Financing Activities
    (1,461 )     (717 )
     
 
               
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    496,396       1,265,923  
Cash and Cash Equivalents – beginning of period
    228,112       3,385,205  
     
Cash and Cash Equivalents — end of period
  $ 724,508     $ 4,651,128  
     
 
               
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
               
Acquisition of asset through capital lease
  $     $ 6,300  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

6


Table of Contents

LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006
(UNAUDITED)
These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes of Lifevantage Corporation, f/k/a Lifeline Therapeutics, Inc. as of and for the year ended June 30, 2006 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A.
Note 1 – Organization and Basis of Presentation:
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of the management of Lifevantage Corporation (“LifeVantage” or the “Company”), these interim Financial Statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2007, and the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 and the cash flows for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or for any future period. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with our current period presentation.
The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included herein are presented as required by Form 10-QSB, and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s audited financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended June 30, 2006, restated as discussed below and included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A on file with the SEC.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Restatement of Financial Statements in Form 10-KSB
On March 10, 2005, the Company reached an agreement with the minority shareholder in the Company’s 81% owned subsidiary, Lifeline Nutraceuticals Corporation (“LNC”). The minority shareholder was a former officer of LNC. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Company exchanged 1,000,000 shares of its Series A common stock (reclassified into common stock as of November 22, 2006) for the remaining 4,500,000 shares of LNC, representing 19% of the outstanding shares of LNC. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 10, 2005 was $9.00 per share. Since the Company’s stock had historically been thinly traded, this 1,000,000-share issuance represented a significant block of the Company’s total outstanding shares. The Company took a marketability discount to arrive at an estimated fair value of $5.31 per share. The acquisition of the minority interest was previously accounted for utilizing the purchase method of accounting resulting in goodwill of $5,310,000.
On November 10, 2006, in response to comments raised by the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) concerning the Company’s registration statement filed on Form SB-2 and the Company’s valuation of goodwill and intangible assets on its financial statements, and to ensure that its financial reporting remains in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the Company’s Board of Directors concluded that it was appropriate to restate the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. The Board determined that, due to a concurrent private placement of the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share at about the time of the acquisition, the acquisition cost of the minority interest in LNC should be recorded at $2,000,000. In addition, since the Company’s motivation in purchasing

7


Table of Contents

the minority interest in its subsidiary was to gain control over its intellectual property, the purchase price for the acquisition should be allocated entirely to intellectual property.
The Company has reflected these revisions on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2006 and 2005 included in its restated Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. The balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 also reflects the Company’s reduction of goodwill from $5,310,000 to $0, an increase of patent costs by $2,000,000 and a reduction of additional paid-in capital by $3,310,000.
Consolidation
The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, LNC. All inter-company accounts and transactions between the entities have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions. Such estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from direct product sales to customers is recognized upon passage of title and risk of loss to customers when product is shipped from the fulfillment facility. The Company ships the majority of its direct sales product by United Parcel Service (“UPS”) and receives substantially all payment for these sales in the form of credit card charges. Sales revenue and estimated returns are recorded when product is shipped. The Company’s return policy is to provide a 30-day money back guarantee on orders placed by customers. To date, the Company has experienced monthly returns of approximately 2% of sales. As of March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company’s reserve balance for returns and allowances was approximately $98,000 and $25,000, respectively.
For retail customers, the Company analyzes its contracts to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for its recognition of revenue on a customer by customer basis.
In July 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with General Nutrition Distribution, LP (“GNC”) for the sale of Protandim®. Among other terms of the agreement, sales are subject to a provision whereby the seller and buyer agree that all products shall be sold on a “sale or return” basis whereby product can be returned by GNC for a full refund. The GNC Vendor Handbook “pledges a 100-percent guarantee by GNC to the purchasers of its products and expects vendors to do the same”. In July 2006, the Company began the recognition of revenue under the agreement with GNC due to the accumulation of historical data. The Company recognizes revenue and its related costs when it obtains sufficient information to reasonably estimate the amount of future returns. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue associated with sales to GNC when the product is sold by the distributor with an allowance for future returns based on historical product return information. Prior to July 2006, all revenue and related costs from GNC were deferred.
In July 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with CVS/pharmacy (“CVS”) for the sale of Protandim® throughout the CVS store network. Among the terms of the agreement, one-half of the payment for all orders is withheld by CVS until certain sell-through parameters are met. To date, approximately $358,000 has been withheld by CVS. Since the Company does not have sufficient history with CVS to reasonably estimate the sell-through of Protandim® within the CVS store network,

8


Table of Contents

50% of the revenue and related cost has been deferred under the agreement with CVS. The Company will recognize deferred revenue and related cost of sales under the agreement with CVS when it obtains sufficient sell-through information to reasonably estimate the amount of future returns.
The table below shows the effect of the change in the Company’s deferred revenue and expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2007:
                 
    Deferred   Deferred
    Revenue   Expense
Deferred revenue and expense as of June 30, 2006
  $ 1,144,950     $ 152,677  
 
               
Recognition of revenue from FY2006 deferred sales
    (748,230 )     (98,268 )
 
               
Additions to deferred revenue / expense for the three months ended September 30, 2006
    678,960       101,627  
 
               
Recognition of revenue due to retail sell-through in the three months ended September 30, 2006
    (199,020 )     (30,118 )
     
 
               
Deferred revenue and expense as of September 30, 2006
  $ 876,660     $ 125,918  
 
               
Additions to deferred revenue / expense for the three months ended December 31, 2006
    126,653       19,381  
 
               
Recognition of revenue due to retail sell-through in the three months ended December 31, 2006
    (221,910 )     (33,529 )
     
 
               
Deferred revenue / expenses as of December 31, 2006
  $ 781,403     $ 111,770  
     
 
               
Additions to deferred revenue / expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007
    208,395       31,564  
 
               
Recognition of revenue due to retail sell-through in the three months ended March 31, 2007
    (186,840 )     (28,523 )
     
 
               
Deferred revenue / expenses as of March 31, 2007
  $ 802,958     $ 114,811  
     
Accounts Receivable
The Company’s accounts receivable consist of receivables from retail distributors. Management reviews accounts receivable on a regular basis to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible. The Company had two national retail distributors, GNC and CVS, and several regional natural products distributors as of March 31, 2007. The Company has created an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $55,000 based on aging of its retail accounts receivable.
For credit card sales to direct sales customers, the Company verifies the customer’s credit card prior to shipment of product. Payment on credit cards is treated as a deposit in transit and is not reflected as a receivable on the accompanying balance sheet. Based on the Company’s verification process and historical information available, management does not believe that there is justification for an allowance for doubtful accounts related to its direct sales as of March 31, 2007. For direct sales, there is no bad debt expense for the three or nine month periods ended March 31, 2007.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are

9


Table of Contents

computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares and potentially dilutive common share equivalents. The effects of potential common share equivalents are not included in computations when their effect is antidilutive. Because of the net loss for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the basic and diluted average outstanding shares are the same, since including the additional shares would have an antidilutive effect on the loss per share calculation.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 establishes standards for accounting for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in business combinations. Goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite lives are not amortized.
As of March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, intangible assets consisted of:
                 
    March 31,     June 30,  
    2007     2006  
     
Patent costs
  $ 2,195,309     $ 2,097,905  
Trademark costs
    103,514       64,137  
 
           
Intangible assets, net
  $ 2,298,823     $ 2,162,042  
 
           
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adhered to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) prior to July 1, 2006. SFAS 123 provides a method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements, based on fair value of the stock-based compensation utilizing various assumptions regarding the underlying attributes of the options and stock, rather than the intrinsic method of accounting for stock-based compensation which is proscribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). The Company adopted the modified prospective application of SFAS 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), for all options and warrants issued to employees and directors subsequent to June 30, 2006.
In an effort to advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Company has established its 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to provide incentives to certain eligible employees who contribute significantly to the strategic and long-term performance objectives and growth of the Company. The Plan was approved by shareholders during the November 21, 2006 shareholder meeting. Options to purchase 2,358,321 shares have been granted pursuant to the Plan to various employees, officers, directors and Scientific Advisory Board (“SAB”) members at a price of between $0.47 and $0.76 per share, vesting over one to three-year periods. A maximum of 6,000,000 shares of common stock can be issued under the Plan in connection with the grant of awards.
Options granted prior to the adoption of the Plan have been terminated and new options on substantially identical terms and provisions (i.e., identical number of underlying shares, exercise price, vesting schedule, and expiration date as the original options) were granted under the Plan. As no modifications to the terms and provisions of the previously granted options occurred, the Company accounted for the related compensation expense under SFAS 123(R) as it did prior to the effective date of the Plan.
In certain circumstances, the Company issued common stock for invoiced services, to pay creditors and in other similar situations. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 96-18 (“EITF 96-18”), payments in equity instruments to non-employees for goods or services are accounted for by the fair value method, which relies on the valuation of the service at the date of the transaction, or public stock sales price, whichever is more reliable as a measurement.

10


Table of Contents

The Company granted warrants and options to various consultants and directors for services rendered during the nine month period ended March 31, 2007. As the Company has adopted SFAS 123(R) effective July 1, 2006, an adjustment to net income for compensation expense to recognize annual vesting has been recorded under SFAS 123(R).
                                 
    Three month period ended     Nine month period ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2007     2006     2007     2006  
Net income (loss) as reported:
  $ (582,333 )   $ (670,911 )   $ (3,167,547 )   $ (1,161,642 )
 
                               
Share-based employee compensation cost included in net income (loss):
    111,566       26,870       1,144,569       77,896  
 
                               
Share-based employee compensation cost that would have been included in net income if the fair value-based method had been applied to all awards:
    (111,566 )     (598,803 )     (1,144,569 )     (888,266 )
 
                       
 
                               
Pro forma net income (loss) as if the fair value-based method had been applied to all awards:
  $ (582,333 )   $ (1,242,844 )   $ (3,167,547 )   $ (1,972,012 )
 
                               
Basic and fully diluted earnings per share:
                               
As Reported:
  $ (0.03 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.05 )
 
                       
Pro forma:
  $ (0.03 )   $ (0.06 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.09 )
 
                       
The total unrecognized compensation expense to be recognized in the future is approximately $735,000.
The fair value of the options granted in the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
  1.   risk-free interest rate of between 4.55 and 4.97 percent in the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and between 3.84 and 4.42 percent in the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2006;
 
  2.   dividend yield of 0 percent;
 
  3.   expected life of one to ten years in 2007 and 2006; and
 
  4.   a volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock of between 74 and 211 percent in the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and between 187 and 263 percent in the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2006.
Reclassification
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to comply with current period presentation.
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncement
In February 2007, SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”), was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and is effective for

11


Table of Contents

fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Board’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. We anticipate that SFAS 159 will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Note 3 –Margin Debt
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company established a margin account to borrow against marketable securities so that sales of these securities would not have to occur in order to fund operating needs of the Company. The interest rate on amounts borrowed was approximately 1% below prime.
During the third quarter, the Company liquidated its marketable securities portfolio and paid off the margin debt. In addition to paying off the margin debt, the Company invested funds in short term AAA rated money market Preferred Securities to maximize interest income.
Note 4 – Stockholders’ Equity
The Company’s portfolio of marketable securities declined in value as of June 30, 2006 and the Company reported an unrealized loss of $(55,607) at that time. In accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”), the Company accounted for the investment as “available-for-sale” securities and recorded the unrealized loss as comprehensive income in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company liquidated its portfolio with a realized gain of approximately $10,000. Accordingly, the previously recorded unrealized loss of $55,607 was reversed.
During the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted warrants and options to consultants for services rendered, under EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services” (“EITF 96-18”). Effective July 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) for employees and directors. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), payments in equity instruments for goods or services are accounted for by the fair value method. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, stock based compensation of $111,566 and $1,144,569, respectively, was reflected as an increase to additional paid in capital. Of the $111,566 stock based compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2007, $86,870 was employee related and $24,696 was non-employee related. Of the $1,144,569 stock based compensation for the nine months ended March 31, 2007, $1,109,869 was employee related and $34,700 was non-employee related. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, stock based compensation of $26,870 and $77,895, respectively, was reflected as an increase to additional paid in capital. All of the stock based compensation for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 was non-employee related.
In April and May 2005, the Company issued, in a private placement, units consisting of 10,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock for $2.50 per share, exercisable through April 18, 2008, to accredited investors for cash and exchange of bridge loan notes. Each unit was offered at a purchase price equal to $2.00 per share. The private placement was made pursuant to an agreement with an investment banking firm entered into by the Company on January 15, 2005. The securities offered in the private placement were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) or under the securities laws of any state. The securities offered were “restricted securities” as defined in Rule 144 under the Act.
Pursuant to the private placement, the Company received $4,988,811 in cash from certain accredited investors in exchange for 2,499,764 shares of common stock and an equal number of warrants. The

12


Table of Contents

Company also issued 1,507,202 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants in exchange for $3,014,372 bridge notes and accrued interest. The Company paid commissions of $508,134 plus a $75,000 expense allowance to the investment banking firm, and issued warrants to the investment banking firm and another placement agent to purchase 409,281 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.00 per share through April 18, 2008. After payment of commissions, the expense allowance, and a fee to the escrow agent, the Company received net proceeds of $4,405,677. In conjunction with the closing of the private placement, the Company repaid bridge notes payable with a principal balance of $160,000 and related accrued interest of $10,733 to note holders electing to be repaid rather than exchange their notes for units in the private placement.
The Company had an obligation to register the common stock issued in the private placement and the shares underlying the warrants received by bridge note holders and investors in the private placement. The Company filed a registration statement for these shares in June 2005 on Form SB-2 and subsequently amended its registration statement. On January 12, 2007, the Company’s registration statement was declared effective.
The Company’s articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of preferred shares. However, as of March 31, 2007, none have been issued nor have any rights or preferences been assigned to the preferred shares by the Board of Directors.
Note 5 — Stock Option Grants and Warrants
Stock Option Grants – During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted 703,321 and 2,358,321 options to employees, officers, directors, and SAB members. Options outstanding grant the right to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at prices between $0.47 and $0.76 per share. The options are not transferable and expire on various dates through January 18, 2017. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) beginning July 1, 2006.
Warrants – At March 31, 2007, 276,428 compensation based and 6,001,866 investment based (i.e., warrants issued during the 2005 private placement) warrants were outstanding. There were 100,000 and 109,000 warrants granted during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, in exchange for services rendered, at an exercise price ranging between $0.46 and $0.98 and expiration dates ranging from July 31, 2008 to February 22, 2012.

13


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Financial Statements and related notes, as well as the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in our Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 and the risk factors discussed therein. The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements. “Forward-looking statements” include statements regarding our expectations, hopes, intentions, or strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding future products or product development; statements regarding future selling, general and administrative costs and research and development spending, and our product development strategy; statements regarding future capital expenditures and financing requirements; and similar forward-looking statements. It is important to note that our actual results could differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements.
Overview
This management’s discussion and analysis discusses the financial condition and results of operations of Lifevantage Corporation f/k/a Lifeline Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”, “LifeVantage”, or “we”, “us” or “our”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lifeline Nutraceuticals Corporation (“LNC”).
At the present time, we sell a single product, Protandim®. We developed Protandim®, a proprietary blend of ingredients that has (through studies on animals and humans) demonstrated the ability to increase the production of superoxide dismutase (“SOD”) and catalase (“CAT”) in brain, liver, and blood. Protandim® is designed to induce the human body to produce more of its own catalytic antioxidants, and to decrease the process of lipid peroxidation, an indicator of oxidative stress. Each component of Protandim® has been selected on its ability to meet these criteria. Low, safe doses of each component ensure that unwanted additional effects that might be associated with one or another of the components are not seen with the formulation.
We sell Protandim® directly to individuals as well as to retail stores. We began significant sales of Protandim® in the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2005. In June 2005, the Company and Protandim® were discussed on a nationally televised news program, which led to a substantial increase in sales. Since June 2005, sales of Protandim® have declined on a monthly basis as we have not received continuing similar national news exposure.
Our research efforts to date have been focused on investigating various aspects and consequences of the imbalance of oxidants and antioxidants, an abnormality which is a central underlying feature in many disorders. We intend to continue our research, development, and documentation of Protandim® to provide credibility to the market. We also anticipate undertaking research, development, testing, and licensing efforts to be able to introduce additional products in the future, although we cannot offer any assurance that we will be successful in this endeavor.
The primary manufacturing, fulfillment, and shipping components of our business are outsourced to companies we believe possess a high degree of expertise. One advantage of outsourcing we hope to achieve is a more direct correlation of the costs we incur to our level of product sales versus the relatively high fixed costs of building our own infrastructure to accomplish these same tasks. Another advantage of this structure is to minimize our commitment of resources to the human capital required to manage these operational components successfully. Outsourcing also provides additional capacity without significant advance notice and often at an incremental price lower than the unit prices for the base service.

14


Table of Contents

Recent Developments
Resignation of Chief Financial Officer
Effective February 16, 2007, Gerald J. Houston resigned as our Chief Financial Officer and from the positions of Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Houston agreed to provide the Board of Directors and the Company with consulting services of up to 15 hours per week through June 15, 2007.
Hiring of Chief Executive Officer
Effective December 21, 2006, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. James J. Krejci as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Krejci became a director of LifeVantage in April 2005 and became Vice Chairman of the Board in September 2006. Prior to accepting the position as the Company’s CEO, Mr. Krejci was President of the CheckAwards Corporation, and prior to that position, he served as Executive Director of the Epilepsy Foundation of Colorado. Prior to these positions, he served as Area Director and then Executive Director for the American Diabetes Association from 2002-2004. From 1998-2002, Mr. Krejci was the CEO and Chairman of Comtec International, Inc., and prior to that, he held general management positions at the 3M Company, General Electric, Becton-Dickinson, Jones International/Intercable, and IGT.
Restatement
On November 10, 2006, in response to comments raised by the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) concerning the Company’s registration statement filed on Form SB-2 and the Company’s valuation of goodwill and intangible assets on its financial statements, and to ensure that its financial reporting remains in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the Company’s Board of Directors concluded that it was appropriate to restate the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. The restatement resulted in adjustments to certain amounts reported in our financial statements issued for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 as well as the current filing. These adjustments affected the presentation and classification of amounts and costs relating to certain patents, goodwill, and additional paid-in capital on our balance sheet. In resolving the above items with the SEC, the Company also adopted a revenue recognition policy with respect to sales of the Company’s product to distributors with right of return provisions. Pursuant to this policy, the Company will utilize the sell-through amounts from the Company’s distributor to the consumer to recognize revenue for such sales, and then apply an allowance for product returns.
Registration Statement
On June 30, 2005, we filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 related to the sale by certain of our shareholders of up to 12,323,867 shares of our common stock issued in connection with our private placement completed in May 2005. On January 12, 2007, the Company received notification from the Securities and Exchange Commission that its registration statement on Form SB-2 was effective.
Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2006
Sales We generated revenues of approximately $995,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and approximately $1,391,000 during the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, cost of sales was approximately $214,000 and $296,000 resulting in a gross profit of approximately $782,000 and $1,095,000, respectively. We generated revenues of approximately $4,208,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and approximately $6,067,000 during the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, cost of sales was approximately $838,000 and $1,256,000, resulting in a gross profit of approximately $3,369,000 and $4,811,000, respectively. A nationally televised news program in June

15


Table of Contents

2005, led to substantial sales during the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2006. No similar national news exposure occurred during the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007, resulting in a decrease in sales and gross profit for such periods when compared to the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006.
Gross Margin Our gross profit percentage for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was 79%. Our gross profit percentage for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was 80% and 79%, respectively. The slight increase in margin for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 is due to the recognition of higher margin distributor revenue during the period.
Operating Expenses Total operating expenses reported during the three month period ended March 31, 2007 were approximately $1,385,000 as compared to operating expenses of approximately $1,812,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2006. Operating expenses decreased approximately $427,000, primarily due to expense reduction and cost containment programs implemented in General and Administrative and Marketing and Customer Service departments. Total operating expenses reported during the nine month period ended March 31, 2007 were approximately $6,485,000 as compared to operating expenses of approximately $6,063,000 during the nine month period ended March 31, 2006. Operating expenses increased approximately $422,000 primarily due to approximately $1,145,000 of non-cash, stock-based compensation expense incurred during the nine month period ended March 31, 2007, offset by the decrease in expenses during the three month period ended March 31, 2007.
Marketing and Customer Service Expenses Marketing and customer service expense decreased from approximately $698,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2006 to approximately $505,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2007. Marketing and customer service expense also decreased from approximately $2,672,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2006 to $2,606,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2007.
General and Administrative Expenses Our general and administrative expense decreased from approximately $997,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2006 to approximately $807,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2007. General and administrative expense increased from approximately $3,104,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2006 to approximately $3,607,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2007. The increase resulted from the adoption of SFAS 123(R) effective July 1, 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, stock related compensation was approximately $112,000 compared to approximately $27,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2006. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, stock related compensation was approximately $1,145,000 compared to approximately $78,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2006.
Research and Development Our research and development expenditures increased to approximately $57,000 and to approximately $196,000 in the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007, respectively, as a result of research, development, and documentation of the efficacy of Protandim®. Research and development expenditures were approximately $48,000 during the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense Depreciation and amortization expense decreased from approximately $69,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2006 to approximately $17,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2007. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased from approximately $238,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 to approximately $77,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to a non-compete agreement which became fully amortized during the nine months ended March 31, 2006.

16


Table of Contents

Net Other Income and Expense We recognized net other income of approximately $21,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to net other income of approximately $46,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2006. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recognized net other expense of approximately $52,000 as compared to net other income of approximately $90,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2006. This change is largely the result of the loss recognized from the Company’s complete disposition and replacement of its legacy e-commerce shopping cart system during the nine months ended March 31, 2007.
Net Loss As a result of the revenues and expenses described above, the Company’s net loss was approximately $(582,000) for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 compared to a net loss of approximately $(671,000) for the three month period ended March 31, 2006. For the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company’s net loss was approximately $(3,168,000) and $(1,162,000), respectively.
Our ability to finance future operations will depend on our existing liquidity (discussed in more detail below) and, ultimately, on our ability to generate additional revenues and profits from operations. At this time, we believe that LifeVantage has sufficient funds to operate our business at its current level through September 30, 2007 if we are unable to successfully raise additional equity or debt financing, increase our revenues, or further reduce expenditures. However, even if we generate revenues at increasing levels, the revenues generated may not be greater than the expenses we incur. Operating results will depend on several factors, including the selling price of the product, the number of units of product sold, the costs of manufacturing and distributing the product, the costs of marketing and advertising, and other costs, including corporate overhead, which we will incur.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity and capital resource requirements are to finance the cost of our planned marketing efforts and the manufacture and sale of Protandim® and to pay our general and administrative expenses. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from the sales of our product.
At March 31, 2007, our available liquidity was approximately $725,000, including available cash and cash equivalents. This represents a decrease of approximately $2,512,000 from the approximately $3,237,000 in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2006. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, our net cash used by operating activities was approximately $(2,372,000) as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $1,416,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2006. The Company’s cash used by operating activities during the nine month period ended March 31, 2007 decreased primarily as a result of lower sales than in the same period during the prior fiscal year.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, our net cash provided by investing activities was approximately $2,869,000, primarily due to the sale and redemption of marketable securities available-for-sale. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, we used approximately $(149,000) in investing activities, primarily due to the purchase of equipment.
Cash used by financing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $(1,500), compared to approximately $(700) during the nine months ended March 31, 2006. Cash used in financing activities during the nine month periods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 was due to payments made under a capital lease obligation.
At March 31, 2007, we had working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) of approximately $259,000, compared to working capital of approximately $2,254,000 at June 30, 2006. The decrease in working capital was due to cash used in operating activities and our significant operating losses incurred.

17


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2006, we anticipated that our then-existing cash resources would be sufficient to fund our operations through at least June 30, 2007. Based on the cost reduction initiatives that we have undertaken to conserve our cash resources, we currently anticipate that existing cash resources will be sufficient to fund our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure needs through at least September 30, 2007. We base our spending in part on our expectations of future revenue levels from the sale of Protandim®. If our revenue for a particular period is lower than expected, we will take further steps to reduce our operating expenses accordingly. Cash generated from operations may be insufficient to satisfy our long-term liquidity requirements, and we may seek to sell additional public or private equity securities or obtain debt financing. Additional financing may not be available at all or, if available, may not be obtainable on terms favorable to us. In an effort to conserve our cash resources, we have initiated reductions in personnel, consulting fees, advertising, and other general and administrative expenses. These measures have reduced the scope of our planned operations by reducing our future advertising budget to promote Protandim®. By terminating our relationships with certain professional service organizations responsible for operations and marketing, and bringing these tasks in-house, we could experience adverse effects on our future financial performance. At our current pace, the Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to fund the Company’s operations in the long-term if we are unable to successfully raise additional equity or debt financing, increase our revenues or further reduce expenditures. Our cash resources would run out sooner than expected if our future revenue is lower than expected or our operating or other expenses are higher than expected. If we are unable to obtain additional financing needed if and when cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned operations, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Additional financing may also be dilutive to our existing shareholders.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our financial statements. Certain of these significant accounting policies require us to make difficult, subjective, or complex judgments or estimates. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if (1) the accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (2) changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, or use of different estimates that we reasonably could have used in the current period, would have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
There are other items within our financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed critical as defined above. Changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a material impact on our financial statements. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with our board of directors, and the audit committee has reviewed the foregoing disclosure.
Allowances for Product Returns We record allowances for product returns at the time we ship the product. We base these accruals on the historical return rate since the inception of our selling activities, and the specific historical return patterns of the product. Our return rate since the inception of selling activities is approximately 2% of sales.

18


Table of Contents

We offer a 30-day, money back unconditional guarantee to all direct customers. As of March 31, 2007, our March 2007 direct sales shipments of approximately $247,000 were subject to the money back guarantee. We also replace product returned due to damage during shipment wholly at our cost, the total of which historically has been negligible.
As the Company has begun to recognize revenue associated with sales to distributors, the Company has also utilized its return rate experience of 2% of sales to estimate returns on its sales to distributors.
We monitor our return estimate on an ongoing basis and may revise the allowances to reflect our experience. Our allowance for product returns was approximately $98,000 on March 31, 2007, compared with approximately $25,000 on March 31, 2006. To date, product expiration dates have not played any role in product returns, and we do not expect they will in the foreseeable future because it is unlikely that we will ship product with an expiration date earlier than the latest allowable product return date.
Inventory Valuation We state inventories at the lower of cost or market on a first-in first-out basis. We maintain a reserve for inventory obsolescence and we base this reserve on assumptions about current and future product demand, inventory whose shelf life has expired and market conditions. We may be required to make additional reserves in the event there is a change in any of these variables. We recorded no reserves for obsolete inventory as of March 31, 2007 because our product and raw materials have a shelf life of over 3 years.
Revenue Recognition We ship the majority of our direct sales product by United Parcel Service (“UPS”) and receive payment for those shipments in the form of credit card charges. Our return policy is to provide a 30-day money back guarantee on orders placed by customers. After 30 days, we do not refund customers for returned product. We have experienced monthly returns approximating 2% of sales. We record sales revenue and estimated returns upon the passage of title and risk of loss to customers when the merchandise is shipped to the customer.
For retail customers, the Company analyzes its contracts and agreements to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for its recognition of revenue on a customer by customer basis.
In July 2005, we entered into an agreement with GNC for the sale of Protandim®, pursuant to which GNC has the right to return any and all product shipped to them, at any time, for any reason. In July 2006, the Company began the recognition of revenue under the agreement with GNC due to the accumulation of historical sell-through and return data. The Company recognizes revenue and its related costs when it obtains sufficient information to reasonably estimate the amount of future returns. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue associated with sales to GNC when the product is sold by the distributor with an allowance for future returns based on historical product return information. Prior to July 2006, all revenue and related costs from GNC were deferred.
In July 2006, LifeVantage entered into an agreement with CVS/pharmacy (“CVS”) for the sale of Protandim® throughout the CVS store network. Among the terms of the agreement, one-half of the payment for all orders is withheld by CVS until certain sell-through parameters are met. Since inception of the agreement, CVS has withheld approximately $358,000. Since the Company does not have sufficient history with CVS to reasonably estimate the sell-through of Protandim® within the CVS store network, 50% of the revenue and related cost under the agreement with CVS has been deferred. The Company will recognize deferred revenue and related cost of sales under the agreement with CVS when it obtains sufficient sell-through information to reasonably estimate the amount of future returns.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company commenced sales of Protandim® to several specialty retailers. Revenue is recognized according to the terms of each individual agreement. Where

19


Table of Contents

the right of return exists beyond 30 days, revenue and related cost of sales is deferred until sufficient sell-through information is received to reasonably estimate the amount of future returns.
Research and Development Costs We have expensed all of our payments related to research and development activities.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
We have reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe any such pronouncements will have a material impact on our financial statements.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this Report on Form 10-QSB, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report on Form 10-QSB.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On December 7, 2005, John Bradley commenced a lawsuit naming Lifeline Therapeutics, Inc., Lifeline Nutraceuticals Corporation, and others as defendants in District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado. Mr. Bradley alleged that he is entitled to additional compensation, in the form of approximately 450,000 shares of our common stock, for services rendered to the Company and Lifeline Nutraceuticals. Principally, the suit alleged violations of the Colorado Securities Act, breach of contract, and fraudulent inducement.
On January 30, 2006, we filed a Motion to Dismiss Mr. Bradley’s claims with the District Court. After written briefing and a hearing, the District Court granted this Motion, without prejudice, on May 16, 2006.
On May 31, 2006, Mr. Bradley filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for New Hearing. On June 14, 2006, the Motion for Reconsideration was denied.
The Company filed a Motion for Payment of Attorney’s Fees and on June 14, 2006, the Motion was granted. In a letter dated September 1, 2006, Mr. Bradley agreed to pay certain amounts in respect of legal fees to Lifeline Therapeutics, Inc., Lifeline Nutraceuticals Corporation and the other defendants, and to file a stipulation and dismissal of the action. On October 25, 2006, a Stipulation and Proposed Order was filed pursuant to which Mr. Bradley agreed to pay the Company approximately $53,300 with respect to legal fees. Through March 31, 2007, the Company has collected $33,648 of the agreed upon reimbursement.

20


Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted options to purchase 703,321 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain employees, officers, directors, and SAB members (see Notes 2 and 5). The options are exercisable for common stock at an exercise price of between $0.47 and $0.49 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for services rendered at an exercise price of $0.46 (see Notes 2 and 5). For these compensatory options and warrants, there was no underwriter involved in the transactions, and the options and warrants were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 6. Exhibits
  10.19   Confidential Termination Agreement and General Release of Claims dated February 14, 2007 between Gerald J. Houston and the Company
 
  31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  31.2   Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  32.2   Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

21


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
             
    LIFEVANTAGE CORPORATION    
 
           
Date: May 14, 2007
      /s/ James J. Krejci    
 
           
 
      James J. Krejci    
 
      Chief Executive Officer    

22


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index
     
Exhibit No.   Description
 
   
10.19
  Confidential Termination Agreement and General Release of Claims dated February 14, 2007 between Gerald J. Houston and the Company
 
   
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002