e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number: 1-12534
Newfield Exploration
Company
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
72-1133047
|
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
363 North Sam Houston Parkway
East,
Suite 2020,
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
77060
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
281-847-6000
Securities registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value
$0.01 per share
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $6 billion as of June 30, 2006 (based on
the last sale price of such stock as quoted on the New York
Stock Exchange).
As of February 26, 2007, there were 129,995,347 shares
of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference: Proxy Statement of
Newfield Exploration Company for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held May 3, 2007, which is incorporated
by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
If you are not familiar with any of the oil and gas terms
used in this report, we have provided explanations of many of
them under the captionCommonly Used Oil and Gas
Terms at the end of Item 7 of this report. Unless the
context otherwise requires, all references in this report to
Newfield, we, us or
our are to Newfield Exploration Company and its
subsidiaries. Unless otherwise noted, all information in this
report relating to oil and gas reserves and the estimated future
net cash flows attributable to those reserves are based on
estimates we prepared and are net to our interest.
PART I
We are an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploration, development and acquisition of crude oil and
natural gas properties. Our company was founded in 1989 and for
the first ten years of our existence we focused on the shallow
waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Today, we have a diversified asset
base. Our domestic areas of operation include the Anadarko and
Arkoma Basins of the Mid-Continent, the onshore Gulf Coast, the
Uinta Basin of the Rocky Mountains and the Gulf of Mexico.
Internationally, we are active offshore Malaysia and China and
in the U.K. North Sea.
General information about us can be found at
www.newfield.com. Our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as any amendments and exhibits to those reports, are
available free of charge through our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we file or furnish them.
Information contained at our website is not incorporated by
reference into this report and you should not consider
information contained at our website as part of this report.
At year-end 2006, we had proved reserves of 2.3 Tcfe. Of
those reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
70% were natural gas;
|
|
|
|
65% were proved developed;
|
|
|
|
35% were located in the Mid-Continent;
|
|
|
|
20% were located onshore in the Gulf Coast;
|
|
|
|
20% were located in the Rocky Mountains;
|
|
|
|
15% were located in the Gulf of Mexico; and
|
|
|
|
10% were located internationally.
|
Strategy
The elements of our growth strategy have remained substantially
unchanged since our founding and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
growing reserves through the drilling of a balanced risk/reward
portfolio and select acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
focusing on select geographic areas;
|
|
|
|
controlling operations and costs;
|
|
|
|
using advanced technologies; and
|
|
|
|
attracting and retaining a quality workforce through equity
ownership and other performance-based incentives.
|
Drilling Program. In an effort to
manage the risks associated with our strategy to grow reserves
through the drill bit, each year we drill a greater number of
lower risk, low to moderate potential wells and a lesser number
of higher risk, higher potential prospects. Our low-risk
drilling opportunities in the Mid-Continent, the Rocky Mountains
and the shallow waters of Malaysia and the Gulf of Mexico are
complemented with higher potential plays in areas like the Gulf
of Mexicos deepwater and in international waters. We
actively look for
1
new drilling ideas on our existing property base and on
properties that may be acquired. In 2006, substantially all of
our reserve additions came through the drillbit.
Acquisitions. We actively pursue the
acquisition of proved oil and gas properties in select
geographic areas. The potential to add reserves through the
drill bit is a critical consideration in our acquisition
screening process. From 2000 through 2004, we made several large
acquisitions that helped establish new focus areas. Since 2004,
our production and reserve growth has come primarily through the
success of our drilling programs. Recently, higher commodity
prices and stiff competition for acquisitions have significantly
increased the cost of available properties. As a result, we have
looked to alternative ways to gain access to oil and gas
properties such as joint venture alliances and leasing efforts.
We did not complete any significant acquisitions during 2006.
Geographic Focus. We believe that our
long-term success requires extensive knowledge of the geologic
and operating conditions in the areas where we operate. Because
of this belief, we focus our efforts on a limited number of
geographic areas where we can use our core competencies and have
a significant influence on operations. We also believe that
geographic focus allows us to make the most efficient use of our
capital and personnel.
Control of Operations and Costs. In
general, we prefer to operate our properties. By controlling
operations, we can better manage production performance, control
operating expenses and capital expenditures, consider the
application of technologies and influence timing. At year-end
2006, we operated about 70% of our net total production.
Technology. By investing in technology,
we give our people the tools they need to succeed. We rely on
3-D seismic
surveys in all of our major areas of operation and use the full
range of technologies to identify opportunities.
Equity Ownership and Incentive
Compensation. We want our employees to act
like owners. To achieve this, we reward and encourage them
through equity ownership and performance-based compensation. A
significant portion of our employees compensation is
contingent on our profitability. As of February 26, 2007,
our employees owned or had options to acquire 7.3% of our
outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis.
Focus
Areas
Mid-Continent. Through an acquisition
in January 2001, we added the Mid-Continent as a focus area.
Since that time, we have tripled our proved reserves and tripled
our production from this area. The Mid-Continent now represents
35% of our total proved reserves. The Mid-Continent is a
gas-rich province characterized by multiple productive zones.
Our two most active plays, the Woodford Shale and the Mountain
Front Wash, are characterized by multiple producing horizons and
large acreage positions. We drilled 354 wells in the
Mid-Continent in 2006 and have a multi-year inventory of lower
risk drilling opportunities. Our Mid-Continent division is
managed by our Tulsa, Oklahoma office.
Onshore Gulf Coast. We established
onshore Gulf Coast operations in 1995 and made major
acquisitions in 2000 and 2002 to establish a significant
presence in the onshore Gulf Coast. Today, this region is a
major focus area for us, representing about 20% of our total
proved reserves. Our operations are concentrated in South Texas,
the Val Verde Basin of West Texas and East Texas.
Rocky Mountains. Through an acquisition
in August 2004, we entered the Uinta Basin of the
Rocky Mountains. The Monument Butte Field, located in
northeastern Utah, now accounts for approximately 20% of our
total proved reserves. The field offers a multi-year drilling
inventory of lower risk wells. We drilled 199 wells in the
field in 2006. The multiple basins of the Rocky Mountains, which
have significant remaining reserves, offer us opportunities for
growth and we are actively pursuing acquisition opportunities in
those basins. Our Rocky Mountain division is managed by our
Denver, Colorado office.
Gulf of Mexico. We are active in all of
the major plays in the Gulf of Mexico: the traditional shelf,
the deep and ultra-deep shelf and deepwater. Although
traditional shelf plays are mature, we remain active and are
finding creative ways to leverage our geologic expertise and
infrastructure. We operate about 180 production platforms in
shallow water. This infrastructure facilitates cost effective
operations and timely development of
2
our discoveries. We have added significant new projects in
deepwater over the last two years. At year-end 2006, we were
producing from four deepwater fields, and our first operated
development the Wrigley Field is being
prepared for production.
Although we believe that significant opportunities remain in the
deep shelf play, the economics of these prospects have been
negatively impacted by significantly higher rates for offshore
rigs. As a result, we have elected to defer most of these
opportunities.
In 2005 and 2006, we drilled our first ultra-deep well on our
Blackbeard prospect. This well was part of an exploration
initiative we refer to as Treasure Project. The well
was drilled to a total depth of 30,067 feet and encountered
a thin gas-bearing sand below 30,000 feet. The well failed
to reach its primary targets because of higher than expected
pressure. The well has been temporarily abandoned. We are
working with the MMS to extend the leases containing the
prospect, all of which are beyond their primary terms. The
ultra-deep targets are high risk but the potential reserve
impact could be significant. We have more than 90 lease blocks
associated with this concept. There is no production from these
depths on the Gulf of Mexico shelf today.
International. Our international
operations have grown significantly over the last several years.
We now have production from offshore China and Malaysia and are
preparing to bring the Grove Field, our first operated field in
the U.K. North Sea, on-line. We continue to seek ways to grow
our presence in these areas and have a team dedicated to finding
new international regions where we can employ our expertise. We
have international offices in Beijing, Kuala Lumpur and London.
We have interests in two offshore Malaysia blocks that together
include current production, undeveloped discoveries and lower
risk drilling prospects in shallow water and a large deepwater
exploration concession. We have four fields under development
and we drilled our first deepwater prospect in late 2006. The
well, located on Block 2C, found non-commercial quantities
of natural gas. The geologic information gathered from this well
is being incorporated into our interpretation for other
prospects on Block 2C. We have a commitment to drill one
additional exploratory well on this block.
During the third quarter of 2006, we commenced production from
two oil fields in Chinas Bohai Bay. During 2005, we added
two license areas offshore Hong Kong in the Pearl River Mouth
Basin and we acquired seismic data for these areas in 2006. We
are seeking additional opportunities both onshore and offshore
China.
For revenues from our domestic and international operations, see
Note 16, Segment Information, to our
consolidated financial statements appearing later in this report.
Plans for
2007
Our capital budget for 2007 is approximately $1.8 billion,
including about $50 million for continuing hurricane
repairs in the Gulf of Mexico and excluding approximately
$100 million of capitalized interest and overhead. About
$290 million has been earmarked for exploration (exclusive
of exploitation) activities. We do not budget for potential
acquisitions. We plan to drill approximately 450 wells in
2007, about 80% of which are lower risk wells in the
Mid-Continent or the Uinta Basin.
Mid-Continent. Our largest focus area
investment in 2007 will be the Mid-Continent. We expect to drill
about 200 wells and invest approximately $700 million.
The majority of the planned drilling is associated with the
development of our Woodford Shale play. We expect to drill about
150 horizontal wells in the play in 2007.
Onshore Gulf Coast. In 2007, we will
balance development drilling of lower risk opportunities with
some higher risk, higher impact exploration tests. South Texas
will be a significant part of this focus area in 2007. We plan
to drill
10-12 wells
in South Texas under a joint venture agreement with Exxon-Mobil.
Overall, we plan to drill about 70 wells and invest
approximately $350 million in the onshore Gulf Coast during
2007.
Rocky Mountains. Our primary capital
program in the Monument Butte Field consists of drilling
shallow, lower risk wells and water injection wells, waterflood
optimization activities and investment in field infrastructure.
We plan to drill about 150 wells in the field during 2007.
A successful
20-acre
infill drilling pilot program, conducted in 2006, indicates that
field development will support an additional 1,000 wells.
3
Production from Monument Butte has been negatively impacted by
refining capacity in the Salt Lake City area. We expect our 2007
oil sales to benefit from recent agreements with refiners which
allow for firm capacity of approximately 11,000 BOPD (gross)
through 2008 and 7,400 BOPD (gross) through 2009. We are
working with other area refiners to secure additional capacity.
Please see the discussion under the caption We may not
achieve future production growth from our Monument Butte
Field in Item 1A of this report. Our 2007 capital
budget includes $135 million for our activities in the
Rocky Mountains.
Gulf of Mexico. We expect to drill
about
20-25 wells
in 2007, including
15-20 in the
traditional shelf and 4-5 in deepwater. About $440 million
of our capital budget for 2007 has been allocated to our Gulf of
Mexico program. Our activities in the traditional shelf are
helping to maintain production levels while generating
significant cash flow to fund other growth areas.
International. In recent years, we have
invested increasing amounts in international operations. Recent
field developments offshore Malaysia and China and in the U.K.
North Sea are expected to add significant production in 2007.
Our planned investment in international ventures for 2007 is
expected to be more than $200 million.
In 2007, our activities in Malaysia will focus on bringing our
Abu Field on-line. In addition, development continues at the
Puteri Field on PM 318 and the East Belumut and Chermingat
Fields on PM 323. Offshore China, our drilling program for the
Bohai Bay will focus on development of our two commercial
fields, where production commenced in the middle of 2006. In the
U.K. North Sea, our Grove Field is being prepared for
production. We plan to drill three exploration prospects in the
North Sea in 2007. Under an agreement signed in 2006, a
significant portion of the costs associated with these
exploration prospects will be funded by another company. The
first of the three wells has been drilled and was
unsuccessful.
Please see the discussion under the caption
Forward-Looking Information in Item 7 of this
report.
Marketing
Substantially all of our natural gas and oil production is sold
to a variety of purchasers under short-term (less than
12 months) contracts at market sensitive prices. For a list
of purchasers of our oil and gas production that accounted for
10% or more of our consolidated revenue for the three preceding
calendar years, please see Note 1, Organization and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Major
Customers, to our consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the loss of any of these purchasers would not
have a material adverse effect on us because alternative
purchasers of this production are readily available.
Competition
Competition in the oil and gas industry is intense, particularly
access to drilling rigs and other services, the acquisition of
properties and the hiring and retention of technical personnel.
For a further discussion, please see the information set forth
under the caption Competitive industry conditions may
negatively affect our ability to conduct operations in
Item 1A of this report.
Employees
As of February 15, 2007, we had 871 employees. All but 70
of our employees were located in the U.S. None of our
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We
believe that relationships with our employees are satisfactory.
Regulation
For a discussion of the significant governmental regulations to
which our business is subject, please see the information set
forth under the caption Regulation in Item 7 of
this report.
4
An investment in our securities involves risks. You should
carefully consider, in addition to the other information
contained in this report, the risks described below.
Oil and gas prices fluctuate widely, and lower prices for
an extended period of time are likely to have a material adverse
impact on our business. Our revenues,
profitability and future growth depend substantially on
prevailing prices for oil and gas. These prices also affect the
amount of cash flow available for capital expenditures and our
ability to borrow and raise additional capital. The amount that
we can borrow under our credit facility could be limited by
changing expectations of future prices. In addition, lower
prices may reduce the amount of oil and gas that we can
economically produce.
Among the factors that can cause fluctuations are:
|
|
|
|
|
the domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels;
|
|
|
|
disruptions in supply and changes in demand caused by weather
conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in demand as a result of changes in price;
|
|
|
|
the price of foreign imports;
|
|
|
|
world-wide economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
political conditions in oil and gas producing regions; and
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations.
|
Our future success depends on our ability to find, develop
and acquire oil and gas reserves. Most of our
producing properties have declining production rates. To
maintain production levels, we must locate and develop or
acquire new oil and gas reserves to replace those depleted by
production. Without successful exploration or acquisition
activities, our reserves, production and revenues will decline
rapidly. We may be unable to find and develop or acquire
additional reserves at an acceptable cost. In addition,
substantial capital is required to replace and grow reserves. If
lower oil and gas prices or operating constraints or production
difficulties result in our cash flow from operations being less
than expected or limit our ability to borrow under our credit
arrangements, we may be unable to expend the capital necessary
to locate and develop or acquire new oil and gas reserves.
Our use of oil and gas price hedging contracts involves
credit risk and may limit future revenues from price
increases. We generally hedge a substantial,
but varying, portion of our anticipated future oil and natural
gas production for the next 12-24 months as part of our
risk management program. In the case of acquisitions, we may
hedge acquired production for a longer period. We use hedging to
reduce price volatility, help ensure that we have adequate cash
flow to fund our capital programs and manage price risks and
returns on some of our acquisitions and drilling programs. While
the use of hedging transactions limits the downside risk of
price declines, their use also may limit future revenues from
price increases. Hedging transactions also involve the risk that
the counterparty may be unable to satisfy its obligations.
Actual quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves and
future cash flows from those reserves most likely will vary from
our estimates. Estimating accumulations of
oil and gas is complex. The process relies on interpretations of
available geologic, geophysic, engineering and production data.
The extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary. The
process also requires certain economic assumptions, some of
which are mandated by the SEC, such as oil and gas prices,
drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and
availability of funds. The accuracy of a reserve estimate is a
function of:
|
|
|
|
|
the quality and quantity of available data;
|
|
|
|
the interpretation of that data;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of various mandated economic assumptions; and
|
|
|
|
the judgment of the persons preparing the estimate.
|
5
The proved reserve information set forth in this report is based
on estimates we prepared. Estimates prepared by others might
differ materially from our estimates.
Actual quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves, future
production, oil and gas prices, revenues, taxes, development
expenditures and operating expenses most likely will vary from
our estimates. Any significant variance could materially affect
the quantities and net present value of our reserves. In
addition, we may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect
production history, results of exploration and development and
prevailing oil and gas prices. Our reserves also may be
susceptible to drainage by operators on adjacent properties.
You should not assume that the present value of future net cash
flows is the current market value of our estimated proved oil
and gas reserves. In accordance with SEC requirements, we base
the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved
reserves on prices and costs in effect at December 31.
Actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower
than the prices and costs we used.
If oil and gas prices decrease, we may be required to take
writedowns. We may be required to writedown
the carrying value of our oil and gas properties when oil and
gas prices decrease or if we have substantial downward
adjustments to our estimated proved reserves, increases in our
estimates of operating or development costs or deterioration in
our exploration results.
We capitalize the costs to acquire, find and develop our oil and
gas properties under the full cost accounting method. The net
capitalized costs of our oil and gas properties may not exceed
the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved
reserves, using period-end oil and gas prices and a 10% discount
factor, plus the lower of cost or fair market value for unproved
properties. If net capitalized costs of our oil and gas
properties exceed this limit, we must charge the amount of the
excess to earnings. We review the carrying value of our
properties quarterly, based on prices in effect (including the
effect of our hedging contracts that are designated for hedge
accounting) as of the end of each quarter or as of the time of
reporting our results. The carrying value of oil and gas
properties is computed on a
country-by-country
basis. Therefore, while our properties in one country may be
subject to a writedown, our properties in other countries could
be unaffected. Once recorded, a writedown of oil and gas
properties is not reversible at a later date even if oil and gas
prices increase.
We may not achieve production growth from our Monument
Butte Field. In August 2004, we acquired the
100,000-acre Monument
Butte Field located in the Uinta Basin of Northeast Utah for
approximately $575 million. The crude oil produced in the
Uinta Basin is known as black wax because it has a
higher paraffin content than crude oil found in most other major
North American basins. Currently, area refineries have limited
capacity to refine this type of crude oil. As a result we
curtailed some production from the field in 2006. In early 2007,
we reached agreements with two refiners that secure base load
capacity of approximately 11,000 BOPD of capacity through 2008
and 7,400 BOPD through 2009. We are working with other area
refiners to secure additional capacity. Without additional
refining capacity, our ability to increase production from the
field will be limited. In addition, the price we receive for our
production from the field has been adversely affected by the
increased availability of black wax and other
competitive crude oil in the market.
Waterflooding, a secondary recovery operation that involves the
injection of large volumes of water into an oil-producing
reservoir, is necessary to recover the oil reserves in the
Monument Butte Field. In 2006, we signed a water source
agreement with the Duchesne Conservancy Water District that
secures access to approximately 62,000 barrels of water per
day through May 2051. This agreement provides sufficient water
for our current operations and will permit some future growth
but our ability to significantly increase production from the
field may be limited if we do not obtain additional sources of
water in the future.
Competition for experienced technical personnel may
negatively impact our operations or financial
results. Our continued drilling success and
the success of other activities integral to our operations will
depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain
experienced explorationists, engineers and other professionals.
Competition for these professionals is extremely intense. We are
likely to continue to experience increased costs to attract and
retain these professionals.
6
We may be unable to obtain the drilling rigs or support
services necessary for our drilling and development programs in
a timely manner or at acceptable rates. In
periods of increased drilling activity resulting from high
commodity prices, demand exceeds availability for drilling rigs,
drilling vessels, dive boats, supply boats and experienced
personnel. The market for oilfield services is currently very
competitive. This may lead to difficulty and delays in
consistently obtaining services and equipment from vendors,
obtaining drilling rigs and other equipment at acceptable rates,
and scheduling equipment fabrication at factories and
fabrication yards. This, in turn, may lead to projects being
delayed or experiencing increased costs.
The oil and gas exploration and production industry is
very competitive, and some of our exploration and production
competitors have greater financial and other resources than we
do. The oil and gas business is highly
competitive in the search for and acquisition of reserves. Our
competitors include major oil and gas companies, independent oil
and gas companies, financial buyers and individual producers.
Some of our competitors may have greater and more diverse
resources than we do. Recently, higher commodity prices and
stiff competition for acquisitions have significantly increased
the cost of available properties.
We may be subject to risks in connection with
acquisitions. The successful acquisition of
producing properties requires an assessment of several factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
recoverable reserves;
|
|
|
|
future oil and gas prices and their appropriate differentials;
|
|
|
|
operating costs; and
|
|
|
|
potential environmental and other liabilities.
|
The accuracy of these assessments is inherently uncertain. In
connection with these assessments, we perform a review of the
subject properties that we believe to be generally consistent
with industry practices. Our review will not reveal all existing
or potential problems nor will it permit us to become
sufficiently familiar with the properties to fully assess their
deficiencies and capabilities. Inspections may not always be
performed on every platform or well, and structural and
environmental problems are not necessarily observable even when
an inspection is undertaken. Even when problems are identified,
the seller may be unwilling or unable to provide effective
contractual protection against all or part of the problems. We
often are not entitled to contractual indemnification for
environmental liabilities and acquire properties on an as
is basis.
Drilling is a high-risk activity. Our
future success will depend on the success of our drilling
programs. In addition to the numerous operating risks described
in more detail below, these activities involve the risk that no
commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs will be
encountered. In addition, we often are uncertain as to the
future cost or timing of drilling, completing and producing
wells. Furthermore, our drilling operations may be curtailed,
delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs and the
delivery of equipment;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
unexpected drilling conditions;
|
|
|
|
pressure or irregularities in formations;
|
|
|
|
equipment failures or accidents; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with governmental requirements.
|
The oil and gas business involves many operating risks
that can cause substantial losses; insurance may not protect us
against all these risks. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
fires;
|
|
|
|
explosions;
|
|
|
|
blow-outs;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
uncontrollable flows of oil, gas, formation water or drilling
fluids;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
pipe or cement failures;
|
|
|
|
casing collapses;
|
|
|
|
embedded oilfield drilling and service tools;
|
|
|
|
abnormally pressured formations; and
|
|
|
|
environmental hazards such as oil spills, natural gas leaks,
pipeline ruptures, discharges of toxic gases and build up of
naturally occurring radioactive materials.
|
If any of these events occur, we could incur substantial losses
as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
injury or loss of life;
|
|
|
|
severe damage or destruction of property, natural resources and
equipment;
|
|
|
|
pollution and other environmental damage;
|
|
|
|
investigatory and
clean-up
responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
regulatory investigation and penalties;
|
|
|
|
suspension of our operations; and
|
|
|
|
repairs to resume operations.
|
If we experience any of these problems, our ability to conduct
operations could be adversely affected.
Offshore operations are subject to a variety of operating risks,
such as capsizing, collisions and damage or loss from hurricanes
or other adverse weather conditions. These conditions can and
have caused substantial damage to facilities and interrupt
production. Our operations in the Gulf of Mexico are dependent
upon the availability, proximity and capacity of pipelines,
natural gas gathering systems and processing facilities. Any
significant change affecting these infrastructure facilities
could materially harm our business. We deliver crude oil and
natural gas through gathering systems and pipelines that we do
not own. These facilities may be temporarily unavailable due to
adverse weather conditions or may not be available to us in the
future. As a result, we could incur substantial liabilities or
experience reductions in revenue that could reduce or eliminate
the funds available for our exploration and development programs
and acquisitions, or result in the loss of properties.
We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these
potential risks and losses. We may elect not to obtain insurance
if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive
relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and
environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. As a
result of the damage caused by hurricanes in 2005, insurance
coverage for these types of storms is limited. Where available,
the cost of this insurance coverage may be excessive relative to
the risks presented.
Exploration in deepwater involves greater operating and
financial risks than exploration at shallower
depths. These risks could result in
substantial losses. Deepwater drilling and operations require
the application of recently developed technologies and involve a
higher risk of mechanical failure. We will likely experience
significantly higher drilling costs in connection with the
deepwater wells that we drill. In addition, much of the
deepwater play lacks the physical and oilfield service
infrastructure present in shallower waters. As a result,
development of a deepwater discovery may be a lengthy process
and require substantial capital investment, resulting in
significant financial and operating risks.
In addition, we may not serve as the operator of significant
projects in which we invest. As a result, we may have limited
ability to exercise influence over operations related to these
projects or their associated costs. Our dependence on the
operator and other working interest owners for these deepwater
projects and our limited ability to influence operations and
associated costs could prevent the realization of our targeted
returns
8
on capital. The success and timing of drilling and development
activities on properties operated by others therefore depend
upon a number of factors that will be largely outside of our
control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing and amount of capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
the availability of suitable offshore drilling rigs, drilling
equipment, support vessels, production and transportation
infrastructure and qualified operating personnel;
|
|
|
|
the operators expertise and financial resources;
|
|
|
|
approval of other participants in drilling wells; and
|
|
|
|
selection of technology.
|
We are subject to complex laws that can affect the cost,
manner or feasibility of doing
business. Exploration and development and the
production and sale of oil and gas are subject to extensive
federal, state, local and international regulation. We may be
required to make large expenditures to comply with environmental
and other governmental regulations. Matters subject to
regulation include:
|
|
|
|
|
the amounts and type of substances and materials that may be
released into the environment;
|
|
|
|
reports and permits concerning exploration, drilling, production
and other operations;
|
|
|
|
the spacing of wells;
|
|
|
|
unitization and pooling of properties;
|
|
|
|
calculating royalties on oil and gas produced under federal and
state leases; and
|
|
|
|
taxation.
|
Under these laws, we could be liable for personal injuries,
property damage, oil spills, discharge of hazardous materials,
remediation and
clean-up
costs, natural resource damages and other environmental damages.
We could also be required to install expensive pollution control
measures or limit or cease activities on lands located within
wilderness, wetlands or other environmentally or politically
sensitive areas. Failure to comply with these laws also may
result in the suspension or termination of our operations and
subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties as
well as the imposition of corrective action orders. Moreover,
these laws could change in ways that substantially increase our
costs. Any such liabilities, penalties, suspensions,
terminations or regulatory changes could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
We have risks associated with our foreign
operations. We currently have international
activities and we continue to evaluate and pursue new
opportunities for international expansion in select areas.
Ownership of property interests and production operations in
areas outside the United States is subject to the various risks
inherent in foreign operations. These risks may include:
|
|
|
|
|
currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
loss of revenue, property and equipment as a result of
expropriation, nationalization, war or insurrection;
|
|
|
|
increases in taxes and governmental royalties;
|
|
|
|
renegotiation of contracts with governmental entities and
quasi-governmental agencies;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and policies governing operations of
foreign-based companies;
|
|
|
|
labor problems; and
|
|
|
|
other uncertainties arising out of foreign government
sovereignty over our international operations.
|
Our international operations also may be adversely affected by
the laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign
trade, taxation and investment. In addition, if a dispute arises
with respect to our foreign operations, we may be subject to the
exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be
successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of
the courts of the United States.
9
Our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, stockholder
rights plan and some of our arrangements with employees contain
provisions that could discourage an acquisition or change of
control of our company. Our stockholder
rights plan, together with certain provisions of our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws, may make it more difficult to
effect a change of control of our company, to acquire us or to
replace incumbent management. In addition, our change of control
severance plan and agreements, our omnibus stock plans and our
incentive compensation plan contain provisions that provide for
severance payments and accelerated vesting of benefits,
including accelerated vesting of restricted stock and options,
upon a change of control. These provisions could discourage or
prevent a change of control or reduce the price our stockholders
receive in an acquisition of our company.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Concentration
Our 10 largest fields accounted for approximately 57% of our
proved reserves at year-end 2006. The largest of those fields,
the Monument Butte Field, accounted for about 19% of our proved
reserves and about 16% of the net present value of our proved
reserves at December 31, 2006. Since 2000, we have
diversified our asset base, and, as a result, our reserves are
more evenly distributed across our focus areas.
Mid-Continent
We have a sizeable presence in the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins.
As of December 31, 2006, we owned an interest in more than
825,000 gross acres and about 3,100 gross producing
wells. Approximately 130,000 net acres are associated with
our Woodford Shale play. The Mid-Continent accounted for
approximately 35% of our proved reserves at December 31,
2006. We operate 91% of those reserves.
Onshore
Gulf Coast
As of December 31, 2006, we owned an interest in nearly
300,000 gross acres and about 650 gross producing
wells primarily along the Gulf Coast of Texas. The onshore Gulf
Coast accounted for nearly 20% of our proved reserves at
December 31, 2006. We operate about 76% of those reserves.
Rocky
Mountains
As of December 31, 2006, we owned an interest in about
221,000 gross acres, 900 gross producing wells and 400
water injection wells. The vast majority of our assets in the
Rocky Mountains are in our Monument Butte Field, located in the
Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah. We operate 100% of our
reserves in the Monument Butte Field. In early 2007, we closed
several transactions that added 100,000 gross acres near
our Monument Butte Field. The Rocky Mountain division accounted
for approximately 20% of our proved reserves at year-end 2006.
Gulf of
Mexico
As of December 31, 2006, we owned interests in about 290
leases on the shelf and 70 leases in deepwater (approximately
1.8 million gross acres) and about 617 gross producing
wells. We operate about 75% of our Gulf of Mexico reserves. The
Gulf of Mexico accounted for approximately 15% of our proved
reserves at year-end 2006.
International
At year-end 2006, approximately 10% of our total proved reserves
were located internationally.
Malaysia. Through three production
sharing contracts, or PSCs, we own interests in three blocks
offshore Malaysia. We own a 50% non-operated interest in PM 318
and a 60% operated interest in PM 323. Both blocks
10
are located in shallow water offshore Peninsular Malaysia. PM
318 covers approximately 414,000 gross acres and had gross
production of about 7,000 BOPD at year-end 2006. On the same
block, we are developing the Abu Field and the 2005 Puteri
discovery. PM 323 covers 320,000 acres and has four
undeveloped discoveries. Also, we are developing the East
Belumut and Chermingat Fields. Offshore Sarawak, we own a 40%
operated interest in deepwater Block 2C, a 1.1 million
acre area. No production exists on this acreage.
China. We have oil production from two
fields on Block 05/36 in Bohai Bay, offshore China. These fields
are within a 22,000 gross acre unit in which we have a 12%
interest. First production from the fields commenced during
2006. In late 2005, we signed agreements to explore on two
blocks offshore Hong Kong in the Pearl River Mouth Basin. We
acquired seismic data across portions of the acreage in 2006.
The two blocks cover more than 2 million gross acres.
North Sea. Our 2005 Grove discovery is
being prepared for production. The field is located on license
area 49/10a. We have an 85% interest in this field. At
December 31, 2006, we owned interests in about
168,000 gross acres in the U.K. sector.
Proved
Reserves and Future Net Cash Flows
The following table shows our estimated net proved oil and gas
reserves and the present value of estimated future after-tax net
cash flows related to those reserves as of December 31,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
Total proved reserves (Bcfe)
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
Present value of estimated future
after-tax net cash flows (in
millions)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,186
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Total proved reserves (Bcfe)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Present value of estimated future
after-tax net cash flows (in
millions)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
Total proved reserves (Bcfe)
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
Present value of estimated future
after-tax net cash flows (in
millions)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This measure was prepared using year-end oil and gas prices
applicable to our reserves and cash flows discounted at
10% per year. Weighted average year-end prices were $5.36
per Mcf for gas and $51.49 per Bbl for oil. This
calculation does not include the effects of hedging. For a
further description of how this measure is determined, see
Supplementary Financial Information
Supplementary Oil and Gas Disclosures
Unaudited Standardized Measure of Discounted Future
Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves. |
All reserve information in this report is based on estimates
prepared by our petroleum engineering staff. As a requirement of
our credit facility, independent reserve engineers prepare
separate reserve reports with respect to properties holding at
least 70% of the present value of our proved reserves. At
December 31, 2006, the independent reserve engineers
reports covered properties representing 83% of our proved
reserves and
11
87% of the present value. For such properties, the reserves
reported by the independent reserve engineers were within 3% of
the reserves we reported. Actual quantities of recoverable
reserves and future cash flows from those reserves most likely
will vary from the estimates set forth above. Reserve and cash
flow estimates rely on interpretations of data and require many
assumptions that may turn out to be inaccurate. For a discussion
of these interpretations and assumptions, see Actual
quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves and future cash
flows from those reserves most likely will vary from our
estimates under Item 1A of this report.
Drilling
Activity
The following table sets forth our drilling activity for each
year in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Exploratory wells:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive(1)
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
290.5
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
296.3
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
151.8
|
|
Nonproductive(2)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
China:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonproductive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive(3)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonproductive(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Malaysia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive(5)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonproductive(6)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonproductive
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploratory Well Total
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
321.5
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
324.2
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
166.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development wells:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
183.2
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
116.1
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
Nonproductive
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Well Total
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
185.9
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
117.1
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 62 gross (52.6 net), 27 gross
(17.5 net) and 23 gross (14.1 net) wells in 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, that are not exploitation wells. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 16 gross (10.8 net), 16 gross
(10.0 net) and 17 gross (11.0 net) wells in 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, that are not exploitation wells. |
|
(3) |
|
The well in 2005 is not an exploitation well. |
|
(4) |
|
These wells are not exploitation wells. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 2 gross (0.9 net) and 1 gross
(0.5 net) wells in 2006 and 2005, respectively, that are
not exploitation wells. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 2 gross (1.1 net) and 2 gross
(1.0 net) wells in 2006 and 2005, respectively, that are
not exploitation wells. |
12
We were in the process of drilling 25 gross (20.4 net)
exploratory wells (includes 22 gross (18.3 net)
exploitation wells) and five gross (3.9 net) development
wells in the United States, two gross (0.2 net) exploitation
wells in China, one gross (0.5 net) development well in
Malaysia and one gross (0.9 net) development well in the
United Kingdom at December 31, 2006.
Productive
Wells
The following table sets forth the number of productive oil and
gas wells in which we owned an interest as of December 31,
2006 and the location of, and other information with respect to,
those wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Outside
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Operated Wells
|
|
|
Operated Wells
|
|
|
Productive Wells
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
274.8
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
311.3
|
|
Louisiana:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Texas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
486.6
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
116.5
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
603.1
|
|
Oklahoma:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
239.5
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
260.9
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
1,139.1
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
109.8
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
1,248.9
|
|
Utah:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,140.7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1,143.6
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Other domestic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total domestic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
1,479.1
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
1,511.4
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
1,934.7
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
271.6
|
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
2,206.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore China:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Offshore Malaysia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
1,479.1
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
2,461
|
|
|
|
1,518.2
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
1,934.7
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
271.6
|
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
2,206.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
|
3,413.8
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
310.7
|
|
|
|
5,791
|
|
|
|
3,724.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The
day-to-day
operations of oil and gas properties are the responsibility of
an operator designated under pooling or operating agreements or
production sharing contracts. The operator supervises
production, maintains production records, employs or contracts
for field personnel and performs other functions. Generally, an
operator receives reimbursement for direct expenses incurred in
the performance of its duties as well as monthly per-well
producing and drilling overhead reimbursement at rates
customarily charged by unaffiliated third parties. The charges
customarily vary with the depth and location of the well being
operated.
Acreage
Data
As of December 31, 2006, we owned interests in developed
and undeveloped oil and gas acreage in the locations set forth
in the table below. Domestic ownership interests generally take
the form of working interests in oil and gas leases
that have varying terms. International ownership interests
generally arise from participation in production sharing
contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed Acres
|
|
|
Undeveloped Acres
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelf
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Treasure Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Deepwater
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gulf of Mexico
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Other domestic
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total onshore
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total domestic
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Offshore China
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
Offshore Malaysia
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
Offshore United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
|
|
3,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
6,006
|
|
|
|
4,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The table below summarizes by year and geographic area our
undeveloped acreage scheduled to expire in the next five years.
In most cases, the drilling of a commercial well, or the filing
and approval of a development plan or suspension of operations,
will hold acreage beyond the expiration date. We own fee mineral
interests in 317,811 gross (99,380 net) undeveloped
acres. These interests do not expire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped Acres Expiring
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf of Mexico:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shelf
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Treasure Project
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Deepwater
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gulf of Mexico
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total domestic
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Brazil
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore China
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Malaysia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Offshore United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title to
Properties
We believe that we have satisfactory title to all of our
producing properties in accordance with generally accepted
industry standards. As is customary in the industry in the case
of undeveloped properties, often little investigation of record
title is made at the time of acquisition. Investigations are
made prior to the consummation of an acquisition of producing
properties and before commencement of drilling operations on
undeveloped properties. Individual properties may be subject to
burdens that we believe do not materially interfere with the
use, or affect the value, of the properties. Burdens on
properties may include:
|
|
|
|
|
customary royalty interests;
|
|
|
|
liens incident to operating agreements and for current taxes;
|
|
|
|
obligations or duties under applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
development obligations under oil and gas leases;
|
|
|
|
burdens such as net profits interests; and
|
|
|
|
capital commitments under production sharing contracts or
exploration licenses.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We have been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits
arising in the ordinary course of our business. While the
outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, we
do not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
15
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security
holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.
|
|
Item 4A.
|
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
|
The following table sets forth the names and ages (as of
February 28, 2007) of and positions held by our
executive officers. Our executive officers serve at the
discretion of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Newfield
|
|
David A. Trice
|
|
58
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and a Director
|
|
|
12
|
|
David F. Schaible
|
|
46
|
|
|
Executive Vice
President Operations and Acquisitions and a Director
|
|
|
17
|
|
Terry W. Rathert
|
|
54
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
17
|
|
Michael D. Van Horn
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
Exploration
|
|
|
−
|
|
W. Mark Blumenshine
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President Land
|
|
|
5
|
|
Mona Leigh Bernhardt
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President Human
Resources
|
|
|
7
|
|
Lee K. Boothby
|
|
45
|
|
|
Vice President
Mid-Continent
|
|
|
7
|
|
Stephen C. Campbell
|
|
38
|
|
|
Vice President
Investor Relations
|
|
|
7
|
|
George T. Dunn
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President Gulf
Coast
|
|
|
14
|
|
John H. Jasek
|
|
37
|
|
|
Vice President Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
6
|
|
James J. Metcalf
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President Drilling
|
|
|
11
|
|
Gary D. Packer
|
|
44
|
|
|
Vice President Rocky
Mountains
|
|
|
11
|
|
William D. Schneider
|
|
55
|
|
|
Vice President
International
|
|
|
17
|
|
Mark J. Spicer
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President
Information Technology
|
|
|
6
|
|
James T. Zernell
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President
Production
|
|
|
10
|
|
Brian L. Rickmers
|
|
38
|
|
|
Controller and Assistant Secretary
|
|
|
13
|
|
Susan G. Riggs
|
|
49
|
|
|
Treasurer
|
|
|
10
|
|
The executive officers have held the positions indicated above
for the past five years, except as follows:
David A. Trice was appointed Chairman in September
2004.
David F. Schaible was promoted from Vice President
to Executive Vice President in November 2004. He has served as a
director since May 2002.
Terry W. Rathert was promoted from Vice President
to Senior Vice President in November 2004.
Michael D. Van Horn joined the Company as Senior
Vice President in November 2006. He served at
EOG Resources, and its predecessor Enron Oil and Gas, since
1993. Most recently, he served as Vice President of
International Exploration. Prior to that position, he was
Director of Exploration.
W. Mark Blumenshine was promoted from Manager
to Vice President in December 2005.
Mona Leigh Bernhardt was promoted from Manager to
Vice President in December 2005.
Lee K. Boothby was promoted to Vice President in
November 2004. He has managed our Mid-Continent operations since
February 2002.
Stephen C. Campbell was promoted from Manager to
Vice President in December 2005.
George T. Dunn was promoted to Vice President in
November 2004. He has managed our onshore Gulf Coast operations
since 2001.
16
John H. Jasek was promoted from General Manager to
Vice President in November 2006. He has managed our Gulf of
Mexico operations since March 2005. Prior to that, he was a
Petroleum Engineer in the Western Gulf of Mexico.
James J. Metcalf was promoted from Manager to Vice
President in December 2005.
Gary D. Packer was promoted from a Gulf of Mexico
General Manager to Vice President Rocky Mountains in
November 2004.
Mark J. Spicer was promoted from Manager to Vice
President in December 2005.
James T. Zernell was promoted from Manager to Vice
President in December 2005.
17
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants
Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol NFX. The following table sets forth, for
each of the periods indicated, the high and low reported sales
price of our common stock on the NYSE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
38.43
|
|
|
|
27.43
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
41.28
|
|
|
|
32.03
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
50.90
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
53.52
|
|
|
|
39.98
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
54.50
|
|
|
|
35.07
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
51.75
|
|
|
|
38.65
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
49.72
|
|
|
|
34.99
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
50.16
|
|
|
|
34.90
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (Through
February 26, 2007)
|
|
|
45.36
|
|
|
|
39.30
|
|
On February 26, 2007, the last reported sales price of our
common stock on the NYSE was $44.20 per share.
As of February 26, 2007, there were approximately 1,900
holders of record of our common stock.
We completed a
two-for-one
split of our common stock following the close of trading on
May 25, 2005. The split was effected by a common stock
dividend.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do
not intend to do so in the foreseeable future. We intend to
retain earnings for the future operation and development of our
business. Any future cash dividends to holders of our common
stock would depend on future earnings, capital requirements, our
financial condition and other factors determined by our Board of
Directors. The covenants contained in our credit facility and in
the indenture governing our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014 and 2016 could restrict our ability
to pay cash dividends.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
(or Approximate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Shares that May Yet
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
be Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
or
Programs(2)
|
|
|
the Plans or Programs
|
|
|
October 1
October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1
November 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 1
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
$
|
48.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All of the shares repurchased were surrendered by employees to
pay tax withholding upon the vesting of restricted stock awards.
These repurchases were not part of a publicly announced program
to repurchase shares of our common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
On November 20, 2006, we announced a program pursuant to
which stockholders owning fewer than 100 shares of our
common stock could sell their shares at no cost to them. We did
not purchase any shares under the program but we did pay for the
costs to administrate the program. The program expired on
January 26, 2007. |
18
Item
5A. Stockholder Return Performance
Presentation
The performance graph shown below is being furnished pursuant to
Regulation S-K, Item 201(e). As required by applicable
rules of the SEC, the performance graph was prepared based upon
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
$100 was invested in our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and
our peer group on December 31, 2001 at the
closing price on such date;
|
|
|
|
investment in our peer group was weighted based on the stock
market capitalization of each individual company within the peer
group at the beginning of the period; and
|
|
|
|
dividends were reinvested on the relevant payment dates.
|
Our peer group is comprised of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,
Apache Corporation, Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation;
Chesapeake Energy Corporation; EOG Resources, Inc., Forest Oil
Corporation, Murphy Oil Corporation, Noble Energy, Inc., Pioneer
Natural Resources Company; Pogo Producing Company, St. Mary
Land & Exploration Company, Stone Energy Corporation,
Swift Energy Company, The Houston Exploration Company and XTO
Energy Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return Analysis
|
|
|
12/31/2001
|
|
|
12/31/2002
|
|
|
12/31/2003
|
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
Newfield Exploration
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
101.52
|
|
|
|
$
|
125.39
|
|
|
|
$
|
166.27
|
|
|
|
$
|
281.93
|
|
|
|
$
|
258.73
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
106.06
|
|
|
|
$
|
141.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
186.79
|
|
|
|
$
|
291.45
|
|
|
|
$
|
287.35
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
77.95
|
|
|
|
$
|
100.27
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
116.60
|
|
|
|
$
|
134.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
SELECTED
FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL AND RESERVE DATA
The following table shows selected consolidated financial data
derived from our consolidated financial statements and reserve
data derived from our supplementary oil and gas disclosures set
forth in Item 8 of this report. The data should be read in
conjunction with Item 2,
Properties Proved Reserves and Future
Net Cash Flows and Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Income Statement
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4.58
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.58
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding for diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing
operating activities
|
|
$
|
1,384
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
997
|
|
|
$
|
659
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
Net cash used in continuing
investing activities
|
|
|
(1,662
|
)
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
continuing financing activities
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of
period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,635
|
|
|
$
|
5,081
|
|
|
$
|
4,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,733
|
|
|
$
|
2,316
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Convertible preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve Data (at end of
period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
Total proved reserves (Bcfe)
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
2,001
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
Present value of estimated future
after-tax net cash flows
|
|
$
|
3,447
|
|
|
$
|
5,053
|
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
|
$
|
2,247
|
|
20
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Overview
We are an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploration, development and acquisition of crude oil and
natural gas properties. Our domestic areas of operation include
the onshore Gulf Coast, the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins of the
Mid-Continent, the Uinta Basin of the Rocky Mountains and the
Gulf of Mexico. Internationally, we are active offshore Malaysia
and China and in the U.K. North Sea.
Our revenues, profitability and future growth depend
substantially on prevailing prices for oil and gas and on our
ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that
are economically recoverable. The preparation of our financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect our reported results of operations and the amount of our
reported assets, liabilities and proved oil and gas reserves. We
use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas
activities.
Oil and Gas Prices. Prices for oil and
gas fluctuate widely. Oil and gas prices affect:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash flow available for capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
our ability to borrow and raise additional capital;
|
|
|
|
the quantity of oil and gas that we can economically
produce; and
|
|
|
|
the accounting for our oil and gas activities.
|
We generally hedge a substantial, but varying, portion of our
anticipated future oil and gas production as a part of our risk
management program. We use hedging to reduce price volatility,
help ensure that we have adequate cash flow to fund our capital
programs and manage price risks and returns on some of our
acquisitions and drilling programs.
Reserve Replacement. Most of our
producing properties have declining production rates. As a
result, to maintain and grow our production and cash flow we
must locate and develop or acquire new oil and gas reserves to
replace those being depleted by production. Substantial capital
expenditures are required to find, develop and acquire oil and
gas reserves.
Significant Estimates. We believe the
most difficult, subjective or complex judgments and estimates we
must make in connection with the preparation of our financial
statements are:
|
|
|
|
|
the quantity of our proved oil and gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
the timing of future drilling, development and abandonment
activities;
|
|
|
|
the cost of these activities in the future;
|
|
|
|
the fair value of the assets and liabilities of acquired
companies;
|
|
|
|
the value of our derivative positions; and
|
|
|
|
the fair value of stock-based compensation.
|
Accounting for Hedging
Activities. Beginning October 1, 2005,
we elected not to designate any future price risk management
activities as accounting hedges. Because hedges not designated
for hedge accounting are accounted for on a
mark-to-market
basis, we are likely to experience significant
non-cash
volatility in our reported earnings during periods of commodity
price volatility. Please see Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Commodity
Derivative Activities.
Results
of Operations
Revenues. All of our revenues are
derived from the sale of our oil and gas production, which
includes the effects of the settlement of derivative contracts
associated with our production that are accounted for as hedges.
Settlement of derivative contracts that are not accounted for as
hedges has no effect on our reported revenues. Please see
Note 5, Commodity Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, to our consolidated
21
financial statements appearing later in this report for a
discussion of the accounting applicable to our oil and gas
derivative contracts.
Our revenues may vary significantly from year to year as a
result of changes in commodity prices or volumes of production
sold. Revenues of $1.7 billion for 2006 were 5% lower than
2005 revenues due to lower gas prices and lower oil production
partially offset by higher oil prices and increased gas
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Production(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
198.7
|
|
|
|
190.9
|
|
|
|
197.6
|
|
Oil and condensate (MBbls)
|
|
|
6,218
|
|
|
|
7,152
|
|
|
|
6,686
|
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
236.0
|
|
|
|
233.7
|
|
|
|
237.7
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Oil and condensate (MBbls)
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
198.7
|
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
|
198.2
|
|
Oil and condensate (MBbls)
|
|
|
7,315
|
|
|
|
8,446
|
|
|
|
7,565
|
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
242.6
|
|
|
|
241.6
|
|
|
|
243.6
|
|
Average Realized
Prices(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
|
|
$
|
7.18
|
|
|
$
|
5.40
|
|
Oil and condensate (per Bbl)
|
|
|
51.40
|
|
|
|
44.06
|
|
|
|
36.61
|
|
Natural gas equivalent (per Mcfe)
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.71
|
|
|
$
|
4.38
|
|
Oil and condensate (per Bbl)
|
|
|
56.58
|
|
|
|
55.68
|
|
|
|
44.26
|
|
Natural gas equivalent (per Mcfe)
|
|
|
9.43
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.47
|
|
|
$
|
7.17
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
Oil and condensate (per Bbl)
|
|
|
52.18
|
|
|
|
45.84
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
Natural gas equivalent (per Mcfe)
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
7.27
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents volumes sold regardless of when produced. |
|
(2) |
|
Average realized prices include the effects of hedging other
than contracts that are not designated for hedge accounting. Had
we included the effect of these contracts, our average realized
price for total gas would have been $7.22, $6.65 and
$5.36 per Mcf for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Our
total oil and condensate average realized price would have been
$50.25, $44.36 and $35.27 per Bbl for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Without the effects of hedging contracts, our
average realized prices for 2006, 2005 and 2004 would have been
$6.42, $7.54 and $5.75 per Mcf, respectively, for gas and
$59.13, $53.36 and $40.95 per barrel, respectively, for oil. |
Production. Our 2006 total oil and gas
production (stated on a natural gas equivalent basis) was
essentially the same as total production for 2005. Successful
drilling efforts in the Mid-Continent were offset by continued
Gulf of Mexico production deferrals of approximately
16 Bcfe during 2006 related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
in 2005, natural field declines and the timing of liftings of
oil production in Malaysia. Our 2005 total oil and gas
production (stated on a natural gas equivalent basis) decreased
1% from 2004. The
22
decrease was a result of Gulf of Mexico production deferrals of
approximately 22 Bcfe related to the 2005 storms offset by
a full years production from our 2004 acquisitions and
successful drilling efforts.
Natural Gas. Our 2006 natural gas
production increased 4% over 2005. The increase was primarily
the result of successful drilling efforts in the Mid-Continent
partially offset by continued Gulf of Mexico production
deferrals during the first half of 2006 related to the 2005
storms and natural field declines. Our 2005 natural gas
production decreased 4% when compared to 2004. The decrease was
the result of production deferrals related to the 2005 storms
and natural field declines offset by a full years
production from our 2004 acquisitions.
Crude Oil and Condensate. Our 2006 oil
and condensate production decreased 13% primarily as a result of
the timing of liftings of oil production in Malaysia. Our 2005
oil and condensate production increased 12% when compared to
2004 primarily due to a full years production from the
Inland Resources acquisition and a full year of liftings in
Malaysia partially offset by production deferrals related to the
2005 storms.
Operating Expenses. Generally, our
proved reserves and production have grown steadily since our
founding. As a result, our operating expenses also have
increased. We believe the most informative way to analyze
changes in our operating expenses from period to period is on a
unit-of-production,
or per Mcfe, basis.
23
Year
ended December 31, 2006 compared to December 31,
2005
The following table presents information about our operating
expenses for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit-of-Production
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(Per Mcfe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(16
|
%)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
%)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
116
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
191
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
144
|
%
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
(23
|
%)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(35
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
8.39
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(25
|
%)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(35
|
%)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
%)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Domestic Operations. Our domestic
operating expenses for 2006, stated on an Mcfe basis, increased
24% over the same period of 2005. This increase was primarily
related to the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense (LOE) increased due to higher operating
costs for all of our operations and significantly higher
insurance costs for our Gulf of Mexico operations. Additionally,
2006 LOE was impacted by the difference ($0.07 per Mcfe) between
insurance proceeds received from the settlement of all claims
related to the 2005 hurricanes and actual repair expenditures
during 2006. Without the impact of the costs related to the
repairs for the 2005 storms in excess of our insured amount, our
LOE would have been $1.04 per Mcfe for 2006.
|
|
|
|
Production and other taxes decreased primarily due to refunds
related to production tax exemptions on certain of our onshore
high cost gas wells in Texas.
|
|
|
|
The increase in our depreciation, depletion and amortization
(DD&A) rate resulted from higher cost reserve additions. The
cost of reserve additions was adversely impacted by escalating
costs of drilling goods and services experienced during 2006.
The component of DD&A associated with accretion expense
related to our asset retirement obligation was $0.06 per
Mcfe for 2006 and 2005. Please see
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies Asset Retirement
Obligations, to our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative (G&A) expense increased
approximately $0.06 per Mcfe primarily due to stock-based
compensation expense recognized as a result of our adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. Please see
Note 11, Stock-based Compensation, to our
consolidated financial statements. The increase attributable to
stock-based compensation expense was partially offset by a
decrease in incentive compensation expense as a result of lower
adjusted net income (as defined in our incentive compensation
plan) in 2006 as compared to the prior year. Adjusted net income
for purposes of our incentive compensation plan excludes
unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives. During
2006, we capitalized $40 million of direct internal costs
as compared to $38 million in 2005.
|
|
|
|
Other expenses for 2006 and 2005 include the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, we redeemed all $250 million of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012. We recorded a charge for the
$19 million early redemption premium we paid and a charge
of $8 million for the remaining unamortized original
issuance costs related to the notes. In addition, we recorded a
$37 million benefit from our business interruption
insurance coverage in 2006 relating to the disruptions to our
operations caused by the 2005 storms.
|
|
|
|
In 2005, we recorded a $22 million benefit from our
business interruption insurance coverage and sold our interest
in the floating production system and related equipment we
acquired in the EEX transaction for a net gain of
$7 million.
|
International Operations. Our
international operating expenses for 2006, stated on an Mcfe
basis, increased 46% over 2005. The increase was primarily
related to the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
LOE increased because our production in Malaysia decreased while
total LOE remained relatively unchanged. Our Malaysian LOE
primarily consists of fixed costs related to our FPSO.
|
|
|
|
Production and other taxes increased as a result of higher crude
oil prices.
|
|
|
|
DD&A increased as a result of higher cost reserve additions
in Malaysia and initial liftings of oil production in China
during the third quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
|
G&A expense increased due to stock compensation expense
recognized as a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 and growth in
our international workforce.
|
|
|
|
We recorded a ceiling test writedown of $6 million
associated with ceasing our exploration efforts in Brazil in
2006. In 2005, we recorded a ceiling test writedown of
$10 million associated with our decreased emphasis on
exploration efforts in Brazil and in other non-core
international regions.
|
25
Year
ended December 31, 2005 compared to December 31,
2004
The following table presents information about our operating
expenses for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit-of-Production
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Per Mcfe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
(180
|
%)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(181
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
116
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
183
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
(58
|
%)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(44
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
|
(14
|
%)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
(43
|
%)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(44
|
%)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
(186
|
%)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(181
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Domestic Operations. Our domestic
operating expenses for 2005, stated on an Mcfe basis, increased
11% over the same period of 2004. This increase was primarily
related to the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
LOE was adversely impacted by deferred production of
approximately 22 Bcfe related to the 2005 storms, higher
operating costs, increased well workover activity and natural
field declines in our Gulf of Mexico properties.
|
|
|
|
Production and other taxes increased due to higher commodity
prices and an increase in the proportion of our production
volumes subject to production taxes as a result of our
acquisition of the Monument Butte Field, increased production
from our Mid-Continent and onshore Gulf Coast operations and
storm related deferrals in the Gulf of Mexico.
|
|
|
|
The increase in our DD&A rate resulted from higher cost
reserve additions. The component of DD&A associated with
accretion expense related to our asset retirement obligation was
$0.06 per Mcfe and $0.05 per Mcfe for 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in G&A expense was primarily due to growth in
our workforce as a result of acquisitions and an increase in
incentive compensation as a result of higher adjusted net income
(as defined in our incentive compensation plan) in 2005 as
compared to the prior year. Adjusted net income for purposes of
our incentive compensation plan excludes unrealized gains and
losses on commodity derivatives. During 2005, we capitalized
$38 million of direct internal costs as compared to
$30 million in 2004.
|
|
|
|
Other expenses for 2005 and 2004 include the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2005, we recorded a $22 million benefit related
to our business interruption insurance coverage as a result of
the disruptions in our operations caused by Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita.
|
|
|
|
As a result of our acquisition of EEX Corporation in November
2002, we owned a 60% interest in a floating production system,
some offshore pipelines and a processing facility located at the
end of the pipelines in shallow water. At the time of
acquisition, we estimated the fair value of these assets to be
$35 million. Since their acquisition, we had undertaken to
sell these assets. In December 2004, when what we believed was
the last commercial opportunity for sale was not realized, we
determined that there was no active market for these assets. As
a result, in connection with the preparation of our financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, we
recorded an impairment charge of $35 million. In early
April 2005, we entered into an agreement with Diamond Offshore
Services Company to sell our interest in the floating production
facility and related equipment. In August 2005, we closed the
sale and received net proceeds of $7 million, which were
recorded as a gain on our consolidated statement of income.
|
International Operations. In May 2004,
we entered into PSCs with Malaysias state-owned oil
company with respect to two offshore blocks. Liftings of oil
production began in August 2004. Prior thereto, our producing
international operations consisted of one field in the U.K.
North Sea, which we sold in June 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in LOE primarily resulted from a full year of
operations in Malaysia in 2005.
|
|
|
|
Production and other taxes increased due to the significant
increase in oil prices during 2005.
|
|
|
|
A ceiling test writedown of $10 million associated with our
decreased emphasis on exploration efforts in Brazil and in other
non-core international regions was recorded in December 2005. In
2004, we recorded a ceiling test writedown of $17 million
associated with a dry hole in the U.K. North Sea.
|
Interest Expense. The following table
presents information about our interest expense for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross interest expense
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in gross interest expense in 2006 resulted
primarily from the April 13, 2006 issuance of
$550 million principal amount of our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016, partially offset by the May 3,
2006 redemption of $250 million principal amount of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012. The 2005 increase is primarily due
to an entire year of accrued interest related to our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014 issued in August 2004 in connection
with our acquisition of the Monument Butte Field.
During the second half of 2004, we financed the cash
consideration for our acquisitions of properties in Oklahoma and
the Gulf of Mexico (aggregating approximately $226 million)
primarily with borrowings under our credit arrangements. By the
end of the second quarter of 2005, we had repaid all of the
borrowings under our credit arrangements for the 2004
acquisitions.
27
We capitalize interest with respect to unproved properties.
Interest capitalized increased in 2005 over 2004 primarily due
to an increase in our unproved property base as a result of the
Inland Resources acquisition in late August 2004.
Commodity Derivative Income
(Expense). The following table presents
information about the components of commodity derivative income
(expense) for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Other derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (loss) on settlement of
discontinued cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) due to
changes in fair market value
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Realized gain (loss) on settlement
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commodity derivative income
(expense)
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
(322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness is associated with our hedging contracts
that qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133.
As a result of the production deferrals experienced in the Gulf
of Mexico related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, hedge
accounting was discontinued during the third quarter of 2005 on
a portion of our contracts that had previously qualified as
effective cash flow hedges of our Gulf of Mexico production and
other contracts were redesignated as hedges of our onshore Gulf
Coast production. As a result, realized losses of
$51 million associated with derivative contracts for the
third and fourth quarters of 2005, which were in excess of
hedged physical deliveries for those periods, were reported as
commodity derivative expense. The unrealized gain (loss) due to
changes in fair market value is associated with our derivative
contracts that are not designated for hedge accounting and
represents changes in the fair value of these open contracts
during the period.
Taxes. The effective tax rates for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 38%, 36%
and 37%, respectively. Our effective tax rate was more than the
federal statutory tax rate for all three years primarily due to
state income taxes and the excess of the Malaysia and U.K.
statutory tax rates over the U.S. federal statutory rate.
In addition, our effective tax rate for 2006 increased as a
result of an $18 million ($15 million U.K. and
$3 million Brazilian) valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets related to net operating loss carryforwards in those
countries that are not expected to be realized. The
$15 million U.K. valuation allowance is due to a
substantial decrease in estimated future taxable income as a
result of the disappointing results of the
recent #7 well in our Grove field in the U.K. North
Sea.
Our effective tax rate for the year 2005 was less than our
effective tax rate for 2004 primarily due to the realization of
a net change of $5 million in our valuation allowance for
tax assets related to certain of our international operations.
An $8 million valuation allowance related to our U.K. net
operating loss carryforwards was reversed in 2005 as a result of
a substantial increase in estimated future taxable income as a
result of our 2005 Grove discovery in the U.K. North Sea. In
2005, we recorded a $3 million valuation allowance for
various international and Brazilian deferred tax assets related
to net operating loss carryforwards that were not expected to be
realized.
Estimates of future taxable income can be significantly affected
by changes in oil and natural gas prices, the timing and amount
of future production and future operating expenses and capital
costs.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We must find new and develop existing reserves to maintain and
grow production and cash flow. We accomplish this through
successful drilling programs and the acquisition of properties.
These activities require substantial capital expenditures. Over
the long-term, we have successfully grown our reserve base and
production, resulting in growth in our net cash flows from
operating activities. Fluctuations in commodity
28
prices and the 2005 hurricanes have been the primary reason for
short-term changes in our cash flow from operating activities.
In August 2006, we reached an agreement with our insurance
underwriters to settle all claims related to Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita (business interruption, property damage and control of
well/operators extra expense) for $235 million.
We establish a capital budget at the beginning of each calendar
year based in part on expected cash flow from operations for
that year. In the past, we often have increased our capital
budget during the year as a result of acquisitions or successful
drilling. Because of the nature of the properties we own,
contractual capital commitments beyond 2007 are not significant.
Our 2007 capital budget exceeds currently expected cash flow
from operations by approximately $350 million. We
anticipate that the shortfall will be made up with cash and
short-term investments on hand and borrowings under our credit
arrangements.
On October 15, 2007, our 7.45% Senior Notes with an
aggregate principal amount of $125 million become due. We
currently plan to fund the repayment with borrowings under our
credit arrangements.
Credit Arrangements. In December 2005,
we entered into a revolving credit facility that matures in
December 2010. Our credit facility provides for initial loan
commitments of $1 billion from a syndication of
participating banks, led by JPMorgan Chase as the agent bank.
The loan commitments may be increased to a maximum aggregate
amount of $1.5 billion if the current lenders increase
their loan commitments or new financial institutions are added
to the credit facility. Loans under our credit facility bear
interest, at our option, based on (a) a rate per annum
equal to the higher of the prime rate or the weighted average of
the rates on overnight federal funds transactions during the
last preceding business day plus 50 basis points or
(b) a base Eurodollar rate, substantially equal to the
London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin that is based on a
grid of our debt rating (100 basis points per annum at
December 31, 2006). At February 26, 2007, we had no
outstanding borrowings and $52 million of undrawn letters
of credit under our credit facility.
The credit facility has restrictive covenants that include the
maintenance of a ratio of total debt to book capitalization not
to exceed 0.6 to 1.0; maintenance of a ratio of total debt to
earnings before gain or loss on the disposition of assets,
interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense, exploration and abandonment expense and
other noncash charges and expenses to consolidated interest
expense of at least 3.5 to 1.0; and, as long as our debt rating
is below investment grade, the maintenance of an annual ratio of
the net present value of our oil and gas properties to total
debt of at least 1.75 to 1.00. At December 31, 2006, we
were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
We also have a total of $110 million of borrowing capacity
under money market lines of credit with various banks. At
February 26, 2007, we had outstanding borrowings of
$45 million under our money market lines.
As of February 26, 2007, we had approximately
$951 million of available borrowing capacity under our
credit arrangements.
Working Capital. Our working capital
balance fluctuates as a result of the timing and amount of
borrowings or repayments under our credit arrangements.
Generally, we use excess cash to pay down borrowings under our
credit arrangements. As a result, we often have a working
capital deficit or a relatively small amount of positive working
capital. We had a working capital deficit of $272 million
as of December 31, 2006. This compares to working capital
deficits of $130 million at the end of 2005 and
$82 million at the end of 2004. The majority of the working
capital deficit at December 31, 2006 relates to the
reclassification of our $125 million 7.45% Senior
Notes due October 15, 2007 as a current liability and an
increase in accrued liabilities as a result of our significant
capital activities towards the end of 2006. The increase in
accrued liabilities is due to our increased exploration and
development activity and higher service costs over 2005. Our
working capital balances are also affected by fluctuations in
the fair value of our outstanding commodity derivative
instruments. At December 31, 2006, the fair value of our
short-term derivatives was a net asset of $200 million. At
December 31, 2005, this amount was a net short-term
derivative liability of $89 million. At December 31,
2004, the fair value of our short-term derivatives was a net
asset of $8 million (see Note 5, Commodity
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to our
consolidated financial statements). Our 2006 working capital
deficit also includes $40 million in asset retirement
obligations compared to $47 million
29
in 2005 and $23 million in 2004 (see Note 1,
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Asset Retirement Obligations,
to our consolidated financial statements).
Cash Flows from Operations. Cash flows
from operations are primarily affected by production and
commodity prices, net of the effects of settlements of our
derivative contracts. Our cash flows from operations also are
impacted by changes in working capital. We sell substantially
all of our natural gas and oil production under floating market
contracts. However, we enter into commodity hedging arrangements
to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in natural gas and oil
prices, to help ensure that we have adequate cash flow to fund
our capital programs and to manage price risks and returns on
some of our acquisitions and drilling programs. See
Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk. We typically receive the cash
associated with accrued oil and gas sales within
45-60 days
of production. As a result, cash flows from operations and
income from operations generally correlate, but cash flows from
operations is impacted by changes in working capital and is not
affected by DD&A, writedowns or other non-cash charges or
credits.
Our net cash flow from operations was $1,384 million in
2006, a 25% increase over the prior year. The increase was
primarily due to 2006 realized oil and gas prices (on a natural
gas equivalent basis), including the effects of hedging
contracts (regardless of whether designated for hedge
accounting), which increased 9% over 2005. See
Results of Operations above.
Our net cash flows from operations were $1,109 million in
2005, an 11% increase over the prior year. Although our 2005
production volumes were impacted by the 2005 storms, higher
commodity prices offset the cash flow impact of the deferred
production. Realized oil and gas prices (on a natural gas
equivalent basis), including the effects of hedging contracts
(regardless of whether designated for hedge accounting),
increased 25% over 2004. See Results of
Operations above.
Capital Expenditures. Our 2006 capital
spending was $1,890 million, a 69% increase from our 2005
capital spending of $1,119 million. These amounts exclude
recorded asset retirement obligations of $16 million in
2006 and $44 million in 2005. During 2006, we invested
$1,161 million in domestic exploitation and development,
$379 million in domestic exploration (exclusive of
exploitation and leasehold activity), $71 million in other
domestic leasehold activity and $279 million
internationally.
Our 2005 capital spending was $1,119 million, a 38%
decrease from our 2004 capital spending of $1,796 million
(excluding recorded asset retirement obligations of
$48 million). During 2005, we invested $696 million in
domestic exploitation and development, $257 million in
domestic exploration (exclusive of exploitation and leasehold
activity), $81 million in other domestic leasehold activity
and $85 million internationally.
We budgeted $1.8 billion for capital spending in 2007,
excluding acquisitions. This total includes $50 million for
continuing hurricane repairs in the Gulf of Mexico and excludes
$100 million for capitalized interest and overhead.
Approximately 24% of the $1.8 billion is allocated to the
Gulf of Mexico (including the traditional shelf, the deep and
ultra-deep shelf and deepwater), 19% to the onshore Gulf Coast,
38% to the Mid-Continent, 8% to the Rocky Mountains and 11% to
international projects. See Item 1,
Business Plans for 2007. Since
our 2007 capital budget exceeds currently forecasted cash flow,
we plan to make up the shortfall with borrowings under our
credit arrangements. Actual levels of capital expenditures may
vary significantly due to many factors, including the extent to
which proved properties are acquired, drilling results, oil and
gas prices, industry conditions and the prices and availability
of goods and services. We continue to pursue attractive
acquisition opportunities; however, the timing and size of
acquisitions are unpredictable. Historically, with the exception
of 2006, we have completed several acquisitions of varying sizes
each year. Depending on the timing of an acquisition, we may
spend additional capital during the year of the acquisition for
drilling and development activities on the acquired properties.
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities. Net cash flows provided by
financing activities for 2006 were $317 million compared to
$88 million of net cash flows used in financing activities
for 2005.
In October 2007, our $125 million principal amount
7.45% Senior Notes will become due. We currently anticipate
repaying these notes with borrowings under our credit
arrangements.
30
During 2006, we:
|
|
|
|
|
issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016;
|
|
|
|
used the proceeds from this offering to redeem $250 million
principal amount of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012;
|
|
|
|
borrowed and repaid $519 million under our credit
arrangements; and
|
|
|
|
received proceeds of $15 million from the issuance of
shares of our common stock.
|
During 2005, we:
|
|
|
|
|
repaid a net $120 million under our credit
arrangements; and
|
|
|
|
received proceeds of $32 million from the issuance of
shares of our common stock.
|
Contractual
Obligations
The table below summarizes our significant contractual
obligations by maturity as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.45% Senior Notes due 2007
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Net derivative (assets) liabilities
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Operating
leases(1)
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Deferred acquisition
payments(2)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas
activities(3)
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other obligations
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
2,425
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
|
$
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 14, Commitments and
Contingencies Lease Commitments, to our
consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 3, Acquisitions, to our consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(3) |
|
See Oil and Gas Activities below. |
Oil and Gas Activities. As is common in
the oil and gas industry, we have various contractual
commitments pertaining to exploration, development and
production activities. We have work related commitments for,
among other things, drilling wells, obtaining and processing
seismic data and fulfilling other cash commitments. At
December 31, 2006, these work related commitments total
$257 million and are comprised of $160 million in the
United States and $97 million internationally. These
amounts are not included by maturity because their timing cannot
be accurately predicted.
Credit Arrangements. Please see
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Credit Arrangements above for a description of our
revolving credit facility and money market lines of credit.
31
Senior Notes. In October 1997, we
issued $125 million aggregate principal amount of our
7.45% Senior Notes due 2007. In February 2001, we issued
$175 million aggregate principal amount of our
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011. Interest on our senior notes is payable
semi-annually.
Our senior notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations
and rank equally with all of our other existing and future
unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. We may redeem some or
all of our senior notes at any time before their maturity at a
redemption price based on a make-whole amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The indentures
governing our senior notes contain covenants that limit our
ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur debt secured by certain liens;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale/leaseback transactions; and
|
|
|
|
enter into merger or consolidation transactions.
|
The indentures also provide that if any of our subsidiaries
guarantee any of our indebtedness at any time in the future,
then we will cause our senior notes to be equally and ratably
guaranteed by that subsidiary.
During the third quarter of 2003, we entered into interest rate
swap agreements that provide for us to pay variable and receive
fixed interest payments and are designated as fair value hedges
of a portion of our senior notes (see Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk and Note 8, Debt
Interest Rate Swaps, to our consolidated financial
statements).
Senior Subordinated Notes. In August
2004, we issued $325 million aggregate principal amount of
our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014. In April 2006, we issued
$550 million aggregate principal amount of our
65/8%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016. Interest on our senior
subordinated notes is payable semi-annually. The notes are
unsecured senior subordinated obligations that rank junior in
right of payment to all of our present and future senior
indebtedness.
We may redeem some or all of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 at any time on or after September 1, 2009 and some
or all of our
65/8% notes
due 2016 at any time on or after April 15, 2011, in each
case, at a redemption price stated in the applicable indenture
governing the notes. We also may redeem all but not part of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 prior to September 1, 2009 and all but not part of
our
65/8% notes
due 2016 prior to April 15, 2011, in each case, at a
redemption price based on a make-whole amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, before
September 1, 2007, we may redeem up to 35% of the original
principal amount of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 with the net cash proceeds from certain sales of our
common stock at 106.625% of the principal amount plus accrued
and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Likewise, before
April 15, 2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the original
principal amount of our
65/8% notes
due 2016 with similar net cash proceeds at 106.625% of the
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption.
The indenture governing our senior subordinated notes limits our
ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt;
|
|
|
|
make restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends on or redeem our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain dispositions of assets;
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, consolidations and certain sales of assets.
|
Commitments under Joint Operating
Agreements. Most of our properties are
operated through joint ventures under joint operating or similar
agreements. Typically, the operator under a joint operating
agreement
32
enters into contracts, such as drilling contracts, for the
benefit of all joint venture partners. Through the joint
operating agreement, the non-operators reimburse, and in some
cases advance, the funds necessary to meet the contractual
obligations entered into by the operator. These obligations are
typically shared on a working interest basis. The
joint operating agreement provides remedies to the operator if a
non-operator does not satisfy its share of the contractual
obligations. Occasionally, the operator is permitted by the
joint operating agreement to enter into lease obligations and
other contractual commitments that are then passed on to the
non-operating joint interest owners as lease operating expenses,
frequently without any identification as to the long-term nature
of any commitments underlying such expenses.
Oil and
Gas Hedging
We generally hedge a substantial, but varying, portion of our
anticipated future oil and natural gas production for the next
12-24 months
as part of our risk management program. In the case of
acquisitions, we may hedge acquired production for a longer
period. We use hedging to reduce price volatility, help ensure
that we have adequate cash flow to fund our capital programs and
manage price risks and returns on some of our acquisitions and
drilling programs. Our decision on the quantity and price at
which we choose to hedge our production is based in part on our
view of current and future market conditions. Approximately 57%
of our 2006 production was subject to derivative contracts
(including both contracts that are designated and not designated
for hedge accounting). In 2005, 81% of our production was
subject to derivative contracts, compared to 72% in 2004.
While the use of hedging arrangements limits the downside risk
of adverse price movements, they also may limit future revenues
from favorable price movements. In addition, the use of hedging
transactions may involve basis risk. Substantially all of our
hedging transactions are settled based upon reported settlement
prices on the NYMEX. Historically, all of our hedged natural gas
and crude oil production has been sold at market prices that
have had a high positive correlation to the settlement price for
such hedges. Therefore, we believe that our hedged production is
not subject to material basis risk. The price that we receive
for natural gas production from the Gulf of Mexico and onshore
Gulf Coast, after basis differentials, transportation and
handling charges, typically averages $0.40 - $0.60 less per
MMBtu than the Henry Hub Index. Realized gas prices for our
Mid-Continent properties, after basis differentials,
transportation and handling charges, typically average
$0.70 - $0.80 less per MMBtu than the Henry Hub Index. The
price we receive for our Gulf Coast oil production typically
averages about $2 per barrel below the NYMEX West Texas
Intermediate (WTI) price. The price we receive for our oil
production in the Rocky Mountains is currently averaging about
$13 - $15 per barrel below the WTI price. Oil
production from the Mid-Continent typically sells at a
$1.00 - $1.50 per barrel discount to WTI. Oil
production from our operations in Malaysia typically sells at
Tapis, or about even with WTI. Oil sales from our operations in
China are currently averaging about $15 per barrel less
than the WTI.
The use of hedging transactions also involves the risk that the
counterparties will be unable to meet the financial terms of
such transactions. At December 31, 2006, Bank of Montreal,
JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, N.A. and J Aron & Company
were the counterparties with respect to 73% of our future hedged
production.
Please see the discussion and tables in Note 5,
Commodity Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, to our consolidated financial statements for a
description of the accounting applicable to our hedging program
and a listing of open contracts as of December 31, 2006 and
the fair value of those contracts as of that date.
33
Between January 1, 2007 and February 26, 2007, we
entered into additional natural gas price derivative contracts
set forth in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Contract Price per MMBtu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Floors
|
|
|
Ceilings
|
|
|
|
Volume in
|
|
|
(Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Period and Type of Contract
|
|
MMMBtus
|
|
|
Average)
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
January 2007 March 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
$
|
7.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2007 June 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2007 September
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
7.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2007 December
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
8,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
10.00 - $11.85
|
|
|
$
|
10.68
|
|
January 2008 March 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
12,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
10.00 - 11.85
|
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
April 2008 June 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2008 September
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2008 December
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of the contracts above have been designated for hedge
accounting.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently utilize any off-balance sheet arrangements
with unconsolidated entities to enhance liquidity and capital
resource positions, or for any other purpose. However, as is
customary in the oil and gas industry, we have various
contractual work commitments as described above under
Contractual Obligations Oil and Gas
Activities.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect our reported results of
operations and the amount of reported assets, liabilities and
proved oil and gas reserves. Some accounting policies involve
judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is
reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could
have been reported under different conditions, or if different
assumptions had been used. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on
historical experience and various other assumptions that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates and assumptions used in preparation of our financial
statements. Described below are the most significant policies we
apply in preparing our financial statements, some of which are
subject to alternative treatments under generally accepted
accounting principles. We also describe the most significant
estimates and assumptions we make in applying these policies. We
discussed the development, selection and disclosure of each of
these with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
34
See Results of Operations above
and Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, to our consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of additional accounting policies
and estimates we make.
For discussion purposes, we have divided our significant
policies into four categories. Set forth below is an overview of
each of our significant accounting policies by category.
|
|
|
|
|
We account for our oil and gas activities under the full
cost method. This method of accounting
requires the following significant estimates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
quantity of our proved oil and gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
costs withheld from amortization; and
|
|
|
|
future costs to develop and abandon our oil and gas properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for business combinations requires estimates
and assumptions regarding the value of the assets and
liabilities of the acquired company.
|
|
|
|
Accounting for commodity derivative activities requires
estimates and assumptions regarding the value of
derivative positions.
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation cost requires estimates and
assumptions regarding the grant date fair value of
awards, the determination of which requires significant
estimates and subjective judgements.
|
Oil
and Gas Activities
Accounting for oil and gas activities is subject to special,
unique rules. Two generally accepted methods of accounting for
oil and gas activities are available successful
efforts and full cost. The most significant differences between
these two methods are the treatment of exploration costs and the
manner in which the carrying value of oil and gas properties are
amortized and evaluated for impairment. The successful efforts
method requires exploration costs to be expensed as they are
incurred while the full cost method provides for the
capitalization of these costs. Both methods generally provide
for the periodic amortization of capitalized costs based on
proved reserve quantities. Impairment of oil and gas properties
under the successful efforts method is based on an evaluation of
the carrying value of individual oil and gas properties against
their estimated fair value, while impairment under the full cost
method requires an evaluation of the carrying value of oil and
gas properties included in a cost center against the net present
value of future cash flows from the related proved reserves,
using period-end prices and costs and a 10% discount rate.
Full Cost Method. We use the full cost
method of accounting for our oil and gas activities. Under this
method, all costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and
development of oil and gas properties are capitalized into cost
centers (the amortization base) that are established on a
country-by-country
basis. Such amounts include the cost of drilling and equipping
productive wells, dry hole costs, lease acquisition costs and
delay rentals. Capitalized costs also include salaries, employee
benefits, costs of consulting services and other expenses that
are estimated to directly relate to our oil and gas activities.
Interest costs related to unproved properties also are
capitalized. Although some of these costs will ultimately result
in no additional reserves, we expect the benefits of successful
wells to more than offset the costs of any unsuccessful ones.
Costs associated with production and general corporate
activities are expensed in the period incurred. The capitalized
costs of our oil and gas properties, plus an estimate of our
future development costs, are amortized on a
unit-of-production
method based on our estimate of total proved reserves.
Amortization is calculated separately on a
country-by-country
basis. Our financial position and results of operations would
have been significantly different had we used the successful
efforts method of accounting for our oil and gas activities.
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves. Our
engineering estimates of proved oil and gas reserves directly
impact financial accounting estimates, including depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense and the full cost ceiling
limitation. Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated
quantities of natural gas and crude oil reserves that geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under
period-end economic and operating conditions. The process of
estimating
35
quantities of proved reserves is very complex, requiring
significant subjective decisions in the evaluation of all
geological, engineering and economic data for each reservoir.
The data for a given reservoir may change substantially over
time as a result of numerous factors including additional
development activity, evolving production history and continual
reassessment of the viability of production under varying
economic conditions. Changes in oil and gas prices, operating
costs and expected performance from a given reservoir also will
result in revisions to the amount of our estimated proved
reserves.
All reserve information in this report is based on estimates
prepared by our petroleum engineering staff. As a requirement of
our revolving credit facility, independent reserve engineers
prepare separate reserve reports with respect to properties
holding at least 70% of the present value of our proved
reserves. For December 31, 2006, the independent reserve
engineers reports covered properties representing 83% of
our proved reserves and 87% of the present value. For such
properties, the reserves reported by the independent reserve
engineers were within 3% of the reserves we reported.
Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization. Estimated proved oil and gas
reserves are a significant component of our calculation of
depletion expense and revisions in such estimates may alter the
rate of future expense. Holding all other factors constant, if
reserves are revised upward, earnings would increase due to
lower depletion expense. Likewise, if reserves are revised
downward, earnings would decrease due to higher depletion
expense or due to a ceiling test writedown. To increase our
domestic DD&A rate by $0.01 per Mcfe for 2006 would require
a decrease in our estimated proved reserves at December 31,
2005 of approximately 13 Bcfe. Due to the relatively small
size of our international full cost pools for the U.K., Malaysia
and China, any decrease in reserves associated with the
respective countrys full cost pool would significantly
increase the DD&A rate in that country. However, since
production from our International operations represented less
than 5% of our consolidated production for 2006, a change in our
international DD&A expense would not have materially
affected our consolidated results of operations.
Full Cost Ceiling Limitation. Under the full
cost method, we are subject to quarterly calculations of a
ceiling or limitation on the amount of costs
associated with our oil and gas properties that can be
capitalized on our balance sheet. If net capitalized costs
exceed the applicable cost center ceiling, we are subject to a
ceiling test writedown to the extent of such excess. If
required, it would reduce earnings and stockholders equity
in the period of occurrence and result in lower amortization
expense in future periods. The ceiling limitation is applied
separately for each country in which we have oil and gas
properties. The discounted present value of our proved reserves
is a major component of the ceiling calculation and represents
the component that requires the most subjective judgments.
However, the associated prices of oil and natural gas reserves
that are included in the discounted present value of the
reserves do not require judgment. The ceiling calculation
dictates that prices and costs in effect as of the last day of
the quarter are held constant. However, we may not be subject to
a writedown if prices increase subsequent to the end of a
quarter in which a writedown might otherwise be required. The
full cost ceiling test impairment calculations also take into
consideration the effects of hedging contracts that are
designated for hedge accounting. Given the fluctuation of
natural gas and oil prices, it is reasonably possible that the
estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved
reserves will change in the near term. If natural gas and oil
prices decline, or if we have downward revisions to our
estimated proved reserves, it is possible that writedowns of our
oil and gas properties could occur in the future.
At December 31, 2006, the ceiling value of our domestic oil
and gas reserves was calculated based upon quoted market prices
of $5.64 per MMBtu for gas and $61.05 per barrel for
oil, adjusted for market differentials. Using these prices, the
unamortized net capitalized costs of our domestic oil and gas
properties would have exceeded the ceiling amount by
approximately $5 million (net of tax) at December 31,
2006. However, on February 22, 2007, the market price for
gas (Gas Daily Henry Hub) increased to $7.48 per
MMBtu and the market price for oil (Platts WTI
at Cushing) decreased to $60.95 per barrel. Utilizing these
prices, the unamortized costs of our domestic oil and gas
properties would not have exceeded the ceiling amount at
December 31, 2006. As a result, we did not record a
writedown in the fourth quarter of 2006. The ceiling with
respect to our oil and gas properties in the U.S. using the
February 22, 2007 prices exceeded the net capitalized costs
of those properties by approximately $900 million.
36
At December 31, 2006, the ceiling with respect to our oil
and gas properties in Malaysia, the U.K. and China exceeded the
net capitalized costs of the properties by approximately
$68 million, $11 million and $19 million,
respectively. Due to the relatively small size of these
international pools, holding all other factors constant, if the
applicable index for natural gas prices were to decline to
approximately $4.80 per Mcf and/or oil prices were to
decline to approximately $50 per Bbl, it is possible that we
could experience ceiling test writedowns in one or all of these
international areas.
Costs Withheld From Amortization. Costs
associated with unevaluated properties are excluded from our
amortization base until we have evaluated the properties. The
costs associated with unevaluated leasehold acreage and seismic
data, wells currently drilling and capitalized interest are
initially excluded from our amortization base. Leasehold costs
are either transferred to our amortization base with the costs
of drilling a well on the lease or are assessed quarterly for
possible impairment or reduction in value. Leasehold costs are
transferred to our amortization base to the extent a reduction
in value has occurred or a charge is made against earnings if
the costs were incurred in a country for which a reserve base
has not been established. If a reserve base for a country in
which we are conducting operations has not yet been established,
an impairment requiring a charge to earnings may be indicated
through evaluation of drilling results, relinquishing drilling
rights or other information.
In addition, a portion of incurred (if not previously included
in the amortization base) and future development costs
associated with qualifying major development projects may be
temporarily excluded from amortization. To qualify, a project
must require significant costs to ascertain the quantities of
proved reserves attributable to the properties under development
(e.g., the installation of an offshore production platform from
which development wells are to be drilled). Incurred and future
costs are allocated between completed and future work. Any
temporarily excluded costs are included in the amortization base
upon the earlier of when the associated reserves are determined
to be proved or impairment is indicated.
Our decision to withhold costs from amortization and the timing
of the transfer of those costs into the amortization base
involve a significant amount of judgment and may be subject to
changes over time based on several factors, including our
drilling plans, availability of capital, project economics and
results of drilling on adjacent acreage. At December 31,
2006, our domestic full cost pool had approximately
$906 million of costs excluded from the amortization base,
including $26 million associated with development costs for
our deepwater Gulf of Mexico project known as
Glider, located at Green Canyon 247/248. At
December 31, 2006, capital costs not subject to
amortization include $292 million related to our
acquisition of the Monument Butte Field. Due to the significant
size of the field, evaluation of the entire amount will require
a number of years. Because the application of the full cost
ceiling test at December 31, 2006 (before considering the
natural gas price increases experienced subsequent to year end)
resulted in an excess of the carrying value of our domestic oil
and gas properties over the cost-center ceiling, inclusion of
some or all of our unevaluated property costs in our
amortization base would have further increased the excess of the
carrying value over the cost-center ceiling. Utilizing commodity
prices in effect as of February 22, 2007, the inclusion of
some or all of these unevaluated property costs in our
amortization base, without adding any associated reserves, would
not have resulted in a ceiling test writedown. However, our
future DD&A rate would increase to the extent such costs are
transferred without any associated reserves.
Future Development and Abandonment
Costs. Future development costs include costs
incurred to obtain access to proved reserves such as drilling
costs and the installation of production equipment. Future
abandonment costs include costs to dismantle and relocate or
dispose of our production platforms, gathering systems and
related structures and restoration costs of land and seabed. We
develop estimates of these costs for each of our properties
based upon their geographic location, type of production
structure, water depth, reservoir depth and characteristics,
market demand for equipment, currently available procedures and
ongoing consultations with construction and engineering
consultants. Because these costs typically extend many years
into the future, estimating these future costs is difficult and
requires management to make judgments that are subject to future
revisions based upon numerous factors, including changing
technology and the political and regulatory environment. We
review our assumptions and estimates of future development and
abandonment costs on an annual basis.
37
The accounting for future abandonment costs is set forth by
SFAS No. 143. This standard requires that a liability
for the discounted fair value of an asset retirement obligation
be recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the
corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount
of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to
its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset.
Holding all other factors constant, if our estimate of future
abandonment and development costs is revised upward, earnings
would decrease due to higher DD&A expense. Likewise, if
these estimates are revised downward, earnings would increase
due to lower DD&A expense. To increase our domestic DD&A
rate by $0.01 per Mcfe for the year ended December 31, 2006
would require an increase in the present value of our estimated
future abandonment and development costs at December 31,
2005 of approximately $40 million. Due to the relatively
small size of our international full cost pools in the U.K.,
Malaysia and China, any change in future abandonment or
development costs associated with the respective countrys
full cost pool would significantly change the DD&A rate in
that country. However, since production from our International
operations represented less than 5% of our consolidated
production for 2006, a change in our international DD&A
expense would not have materially affected our consolidated
results of operations.
Allocation
of Purchase Price in Business Combinations
As part of our growth strategy, we actively pursue the
acquisition of oil and gas properties. The purchase price in an
acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their relative fair values as of the
acquisition date, which may occur many months after the
announcement date. Therefore, while the consideration to be paid
may be fixed, the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed is subject to change during the period
between the announcement date and the acquisition date. Our most
significant estimates in our allocation typically relate to the
value assigned to future recoverable oil and gas reserves and
unproved properties. To the extent the consideration paid
exceeds the fair value of the net assets acquired, we are
required to record the excess as an asset called goodwill. As
the allocation of the purchase price is subject to significant
estimates and subjective judgments, the accuracy of this
assessment is inherently uncertain. The value allocated to
recoverable oil and gas reserves and unproved properties is
subject to the cost center ceiling as described under
Full Cost Ceiling Limitation
above.
Goodwill of each reporting unit (each country is a separate
reporting unit) is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or
more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that
would reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its
carrying amount. In making this assessment, we rely on a number
of factors including operating results, business plans, economic
projections and anticipated cash flows. As there are inherent
uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in
applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment, there is
risk that the carrying value of our goodwill may be overstated.
If it is overstated, such impairment would reduce earnings
during the period in which the impairment occurs and would
result in a corresponding reduction to goodwill. We elected to
make December 31 our annual assessment date.
Commodity
Derivative Activities
We utilize derivative contracts to hedge against the variability
in cash flows associated with the forecasted sale of our future
natural gas and oil production. We generally hedge a
substantial, but varying, portion of our anticipated oil and
natural gas production for the next
12-24 months.
In the case of acquisitions, we may hedge acquired production
for a longer period. We do not use derivative instruments for
trading purposes. Under accounting rules, we may elect to
designate those derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting as
cash flow hedges against the price that we will receive for our
future oil and natural gas production. To the extent that
changes in the fair values of the cash flow hedges offset
changes in the expected cash flows from our forecasted
production, such amounts are not included in our consolidated
results of operations. Instead, they are recorded directly to
stockholders equity until the hedged oil or natural gas
quantities are produced and sold. To the extent that changes in
the fair values of the derivative exceed the changes in the
expected cash flows from the forecasted production, the changes
are recorded in income in the period in which they occur.
Derivatives that do not qualify (such as three-way collar
contracts see Note 5, Commodity
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to our
consolidated financial statements) or have not been designated
as
38
cash flow hedges for hedge accounting are carried at their fair
value on our consolidated balance sheet. We recognize all
changes in the fair value of these contracts on our consolidated
statement of income in the period in which the changes occur.
Beginning on October 1, 2005, we elected not to designate
any future price risk management activities as accounting
hedges. Because derivative contracts not designated for hedge
accounting are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis, we are
likely to experience significant non-cash volatility in our
reported earnings during periods of commodity price volatility.
In determining the amounts to be recorded for cash flow hedges,
we are required to estimate the fair values of both the
derivative and the associated hedged production at its physical
location. Where necessary, we adjust NYMEX prices to other
regional delivery points using our own estimates of future
regional prices. Our estimates are based upon various factors
that include closing prices on the NYMEX,
over-the-counter
quotations, volatility and the time value of options. The
calculation of the fair value of our option contracts requires
the use of an option-pricing model. The estimated future prices
are compared to the prices fixed by the hedge agreements and the
resulting estimated future cash inflows or outflows over the
lives of the hedges are discounted to calculate the fair value
of the derivative contracts. These pricing and discounting
variables are sensitive to market volatility as well as changes
in future price forecasts, regional price differences and
interest rates. We periodically validate our valuations using
independent, third-party quotations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)) to account for
stock-based compensation. Under this method, compensation cost
is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of an
award and is recognized over the service period, which is
usually the vesting period. We elected to use the modified
prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation
expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other
equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of
adoption. The determination of the fair value of an award
requires significant estimates and subjective judgments
regarding, among other things, the appropriate option pricing
model, the expected life of the award and performance vesting
criteria assumptions. As there are inherent uncertainties
related to these factors and our judgment in applying them to
the fair value determinations, there is risk that the recorded
stock compensation may not accurately reflect the amount
ultimately earned by the employee. For years prior to 2006, we
accounted for our stock-based compensation in accordance with
the intrinsic value method. Under this method, we recognized
compensation cost as the excess, if any, of the quoted market
price of our stock at the grant date over the amount an employee
must pay to acquire the stock. Please see Note 1,
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Stock-Based Compensation, to
our consolidated financial statements.
New
Accounting Standard
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for
how companies should recognize, measure, present and disclose in
their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax
positions are recognized in our consolidated financial
statements as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater
than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with
tax authorities assuming full knowledge of the position and all
relevant facts. These amounts are subsequently reevalvated and
changes are recognized as adjustments to current period tax
expense. FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements to
include an annual tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax
benefits. We are required to adopt FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. Upon adoption, we will be required to
apply the provisions of FIN 48 to all tax positions and any
cumulative effect adjustment will be recognized as an adjustment
to retained earnings. We have completed our initial evaluation
of the impact of FIN 48 and determined that its adoption is
not expected to have a material impact on our financial position
or results of operations.
39
Regulation
Exploration and development and the production and sale of oil
and natural gas are subject to extensive federal, state, local
and international regulation. An overview of this regulation is
set forth below. We believe we are in substantial compliance
with currently applicable laws and regulations and that
continued substantial compliance with existing requirements will
not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
cash flows or results of operations. However, current regulatory
requirements may change, currently unforeseen environmental
incidents may occur or past non-compliance with environmental
laws or regulations may be discovered. Please see the discussion
under the caption We are subject to complex laws that
can affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing
business in Item 1A of this report.
Federal Regulation of Sales and Transportation of Natural
Gas. Historically, the transportation and
sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce has been
regulated pursuant to several laws enacted by Congress and the
regulations promulgated under these laws by the FERC. In the
past, the federal government has regulated the prices at which
gas could be sold. Congress removed all price and non-price
controls affecting wellhead sales of natural gas effective
January 1, 1993. Congress could, however, reenact price
controls in the future.
Our sales of natural gas are affected by the availability, terms
and cost of transportation. The price and terms for access to
pipeline transportation are subject to extensive federal and
state regulation. From 1985 to the present, several major
regulatory changes have been implemented by Congress and the
FERC that affect the economics of natural gas production,
transportation and sales. In addition, the FERC is continually
proposing and implementing new rules and regulations affecting
those segments of the natural gas industry, most notably
interstate natural gas transmission companies, that remain
subject to the FERCs jurisdiction. These initiatives also
may affect the intrastate transportation of gas under certain
circumstances. The stated purpose of many of these regulatory
changes is to promote competition among the various sectors of
the natural gas industry and these initiatives generally reflect
more light-handed regulation.
The ultimate impact of the complex rules and regulations issued
by the FERC since 1985 cannot be predicted. In addition, some
aspects of these regulatory developments have not become final
but are still pending judicial and FERC final decisions. We
cannot predict what further action the FERC will take on these
matters. Some of the FERCs more recent proposals may,
however, adversely affect the availability and reliability of
interruptible transportation service on interstate pipelines. We
do not believe that we will be affected by any action taken
materially differently than other natural gas producers,
gatherers and marketers with which we compete.
The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, or OCSLA, requires that
all pipelines operating on or across the shelf provide
open-access, non-discriminatory service. There are currently no
regulations implemented by the FERC under its OCSLA authority on
gatherers and other entities outside the reach of its Natural
Gas Act jurisdiction. Therefore, we do not believe that any FERC
or MMS action taken under OCSLA will affect us in a way that
materially differs from the way it affects other natural gas
producers, gatherers and marketers with which we compete.
On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed into law the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (2005 EPA). This comprehensive act
contains many provisions that will encourage oil and gas
exploration and development in the U.S. The 2005 EPA
directs the FERC, MMS and other federal agencies to issue
regulations that will further the goals set out in the 2005 EPA.
We believe that neither the 2005 EPA nor the regulations
promulgated, or to be promulgated, as a result of the 2005 EPA
will affect us in a way that materially differs from the way
they affect other natural gas producers, gatherers and marketers
with which we compete.
Additional proposals and proceedings that might affect the
natural gas industry are pending before Congress, the FERC and
the courts. The natural gas industry historically has been very
heavily regulated; therefore, there is no assurance that the
less stringent regulatory approach recently pursued by the FERC
and Congress will continue.
Federal Regulation of Sales and Transportation of Crude
Oil. Our sales of crude oil and condensate
are currently not regulated. In a number of instances, however,
the ability to transport and sell such products
40
are dependent on pipelines whose rates, terms and conditions of
service are subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Interstate
Commerce Act. Certain regulations implemented by the FERC in
recent years could result in an increase in the cost of
transportation service on certain petroleum products pipelines.
However, we do not believe that these regulations affect us any
differently than other crude oil and condensate producers.
Federal Leases. Most of our oil and gas
leases in Utah and the Gulf of Mexico are granted by the federal
government and administered by the MMS or the BLM, both federal
agencies. MMS and BLM leases contain relatively standardized
terms and require compliance with detailed BLM or MMS
regulations and, in the case of offshore leases, orders pursuant
to OCSLA (which are subject to change by the MMS). Many onshore
leases contain stipulations limiting activities that may be
conducted on the lease. Some stipulations are unique to
particular geographic areas and may limit the time during which
activities on the lease may be conducted, the manner in which
certain activities may be conducted or, in some cases, may ban
surface activity. For offshore operations, lessees must obtain
MMS approval for exploration, development and production plans
prior to the commencement of such operations. In addition to
permits required from other agencies (such as the Coast Guard,
the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection
Agency), lessees must obtain a permit from the BLM or the MMS,
as applicable, prior to the commencement of drilling, and comply
with regulations governing, among other things, engineering and
construction specifications for production facilities, safety
procedures, plugging and abandonment of wells on the Shelf and
removal of facilities. To cover the various obligations of
lessees on the Shelf, the MMS generally requires that lessees
have substantial net worth or post bonds or other acceptable
assurances that such obligations will be met. The cost of such
bonds or other surety can be substantial and there is no
assurance that bonds or other surety can be obtained in all
cases. We are currently exempt from the supplemental bonding
requirements of the MMS. Under certain circumstances, the BLM or
the MMS, as applicable, may require that our operations on
federal leases be suspended or terminated. Any such suspension
or termination could materially and adversely affect our
financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
The MMS regulations governing the calculation of royalties and
the valuation of crude oil produced from federal leases provide
that the MMS will collect royalties based upon the market value
of oil produced from federal leases. The 2005 EPA formalizes the
royalty in-kind program of the MMS, providing that the MMS may
take royalties in-kind if the Secretary of the Interior
determines that the benefits are greater than or equal to the
benefits that are likely to have been received had royalties
been taken in value. We believe that the MMS royalty
in-kind program will not have a material effect on our financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
In 2006, the MMS amended its regulations to require additional
filing fees. The MMS has estimated that these additional filing
fees will represent less than 0.1% of the revenues of companies
with offshore operations in most cases. We do not believe that
these additional filing fees will affect us in a way that
materially differs from the way they affect other producers,
gatherers and marketers with which we compete.
State and Local Regulation of Drilling and
Production. We own interests in properties
located onshore in Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and
Utah. We also own interests in properties in state waters
offshore Texas and Louisiana. These states regulate drilling and
operating activities by requiring, among other things, permits
for the drilling of wells, maintaining bonding requirements in
order to drill or operate wells, and regulating the location of
wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use
and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled and
the plugging and abandonment of wells. The laws of these states
also govern a number of environmental and conservation matters,
including the handling and disposing or discharge of waste
materials, the size of drilling and spacing units or proration
units and the density of wells that may be drilled, unitization
and pooling of oil and gas properties and establishment of
maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells. Some states
prorate production to the market demand for oil and gas.
Environmental Regulations. Our
operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relating to environmental protection. The cost of
compliance could be significant. Failure to comply with these
laws and regulations may result in the assessment of
administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of
remedial and damage payment obligations, or the issuance of
injunctive relief (including orders to cease operations).
Environmental laws and
41
regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to
become more stringent over time. We also are subject to various
environmental permit requirements. Both onshore and offshore
drilling in certain areas has been opposed by environmental
groups and, in certain areas, has been restricted. Moreover,
some environmental laws and regulations may impose strict
liability, which could subject us to liability for conduct that
was lawful at the time it occurred or conduct or conditions
caused by prior operators or third parties. To the extent laws
are enacted or other governmental action is taken that prohibits
or restricts onshore or offshore drilling or imposes
environmental protection requirements that result in increased
costs to the oil and gas industry in general, our business and
prospects could be adversely affected.
The Oil Pollution Act, or OPA, imposes regulations on
responsible parties related to the prevention of oil
spills and liability for damages resulting from spills in
U.S. waters. A responsible party includes the
owner or operator of an onshore facility, vessel or pipeline, or
the lessee or permittee of the area in which an offshore
facility is located. OPA assigns strict, joint and several
liability to each responsible party for oil removal costs and a
variety of public and private damages. While liability limits
apply in some circumstances, a party cannot take advantage of
liability limits if the spill was caused by gross negligence or
willful misconduct or resulted from violation of a federal
safety, construction or operating regulation, or if the party
fails to report a spill or to cooperate fully in the cleanup.
Even if applicable, the liability limits for offshore facilities
require the responsible party to pay all removal costs, plus up
to $75 million in other damages for offshore facilities and
up to $350 million for onshore facilities. Few defenses
exist to the liability imposed by OPA. Failure to comply with
ongoing requirements or inadequate cooperation during a spill
event may subject a responsible party to administrative, civil
or criminal enforcement actions.
OPA also requires operators in the Gulf of Mexico to demonstrate
to the MMS that they possess available financial resources that
are sufficient to pay for costs that may be incurred in
responding to an oil spill. Under OPA and implementing MMS
regulations, responsible parties are required to demonstrate
that they possess financial resources sufficient to pay for
environmental cleanup and restoration costs of at least
$10 million for an oil spill in state waters and at least
$35 million for an oil spill in federal waters. Since we
currently have extensive operations in federal waters, we
currently provide a total of $150 million in financial
assurance to MMS.
In addition to OPA, our discharges to waters of the
U.S. are further limited by the federal Clean Water Act, or
CWA, and analogous state laws. The CWA prohibits any discharge
into waters of the United States except in compliance with
permits issued by federal and state governmental agencies.
Failure to comply with the CWA, including discharge limits set
by permits issued pursuant to the CWA, may also result in
administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions. The OPA
and CWA also require the preparation of oil spill response plans
and spill prevention, control and countermeasure or
SPCC plans. We have such plans in existence and are
currently amending these plans or, as necessary, developing new
SPCC plans that will satisfy new SPCC plan certification and
implementation requirements that become effective in
July 2009.
OCSLA authorizes regulations relating to safety and
environmental protection applicable to lessees and permittees
operating on the Shelf. Specific design and operational
standards may apply to vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles and
structures operating or located on the Shelf. Violations of
lease conditions or regulations issued pursuant to OCSLA can
result in substantial administrative, civil and criminal
penalties, as well as potential court injunctions curtailing
operations and the cancellation of leases.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, generally
regulates the disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and imposes
certain environmental cleanup obligations. Although RCRA
specifically excludes from the definition of hazardous waste
drilling fluids, produced waters and other wastes
associated with the exploration, development or production of
crude oil, natural gas or geothermal energy, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, also known as the
EPA and state agencies may regulate these wastes as
solid wastes. Moreover, ordinary industrial wastes, such as
paint wastes, waste solvents, laboratory wastes and waste oils,
may be regulated as hazardous waste.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or the Superfund
law, and comparable state laws impose liability, without regard
to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on persons
that are considered to have contributed to the release of a
hazardous
42
substance into the environment. Such responsible
persons may be subject to joint and several liability
under the Superfund law for the costs of cleaning up the
hazardous substances that have been released into the
environment and for damages to natural resources, and it is not
uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to
file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly
caused by the hazardous substances released into the
environment. We currently own or lease onshore properties that
have been used for the exploration and production of oil and gas
for a number of years. Many of these onshore properties have
been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or
release of hydrocarbons or other wastes was not under our
control. These properties and any wastes that may have been
disposed or released on them may be subject to the Superfund
law, RCRA and analogous state laws and common law obligations,
and we potentially could be required to investigate and
remediate such properties, including soil or groundwater
contamination by prior owners or operators, or to perform
remedial plugging or pit closure operations to prevent future
contamination.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) and comparable state statutes restricts
the emission of air pollutants and affects both onshore and
offshore oil and gas operations. New facilities may be required
to obtain separate construction and operating permits before
construction work can begin or operations may start, and
existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in
order to remain in compliance. Also, the EPA has developed and
continues to develop more stringent regulations governing
emissions of toxic air pollutants. These regulations may
increase the costs of compliance for some facilities.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable
state statutes regulate the protection of the health and safety
of workers. The OSHA hazard communication standard requires
maintenance of information about hazardous materials used or
produced in operations and provision of such information to
employees. Other OSHA standards regulate specific worker safety
aspects of our operations. Failure to comply with OSHA
requirements can lead to the imposition of penalties.
International Regulations. Our
exploration and production operations outside the United States
are subject to various types of regulations similar to those
described above imposed by the respective governments of the
countries in which we operate, and may affect our operations and
costs within that country. We currently have operations in
Malaysia, China and the United Kingdom.
Forward-Looking
Information
This report contains information that is forward-looking or
relates to anticipated future events or results such as planned
capital expenditures, the availability of capital resources to
fund capital expenditures, estimates of proved reserves and the
estimated present value of such reserves, wells planned to be
drilled in the future, our financing plans and our business
strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in this
information are reasonable, this information is based upon
assumptions and anticipated results that are subject to numerous
uncertainties. Actual results may vary significantly from those
anticipated due to many factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
drilling results;
|
|
|
|
oil and gas prices;
|
|
|
|
well and waterflood performance;
|
|
|
|
severe weather conditions (such as hurricanes);
|
|
|
|
the prices of goods and services;
|
|
|
|
the availability of drilling rigs and other support services;
|
|
|
|
the availability of capital resources; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors affecting our business described above under
the caption Risk Factors.
|
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to
us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in
their entirety by such factors.
43
Commonly
Used Oil and Gas Terms
Below are explanations of some commonly used terms in the oil
and gas business.
Basis risk. The risk associated with
the sales point price for oil or gas production varying from the
reference (or settlement) price for a particular hedging
transaction.
Barrel or Bbl. One stock tank barrel,
or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume.
Bcf. Billion cubic feet.
Bcfe. Billion cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one
barrel of crude oil or condensate.
BLM. The Bureau of Land Management of
the United States Department of the Interior.
BOPD. Barrels of oil per day.
Btu. British thermal unit, which is the
heat required to raise the temperature of a one-pound mass of
water from 58.5 to 59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.
Carried interest. An arrangement under
which an interest in oil and gas rights is assigned in
consideration for the assignee advancing all or a portion of the
funds to explore on, develop or operate an oil or gas property.
Completion. The installation of
permanent equipment for the production of oil or natural gas, or
in the case of a dry hole, the reporting of abandonment to the
appropriate agency.
Deep shelf. We consider the deep shelf
to be structures located on the Shelf at depths generally
greater than 14,000 feet in over pressured horizons where
there has been limited or no production from deeper
stratigraphic zones.
Deepwater. Generally considered to be
water depths in excess of 1,000 feet.
Developed acreage. The number of acres
that are allocated or assignable to producing wells or wells
capable of production.
Development well. A well drilled within
the proved area of an oil or natural gas field to the depth of a
stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
Dry hole or well. A well found to be
incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities
such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed
production expenses and taxes.
Exploitation well. An exploration well
drilled to find and produce probable reserves. Most of the
exploitation wells we drilled in 2005 and 2006 and expect to
drill in 2007 are located in the Mid-Continent or the Monument
Butte Field. Exploitation wells in those areas have less risk
and less reserve potential and typically may be drilled at a
lower cost than other exploration wells. For internal reporting
and budgeting purposes, we combine exploitation and development
activities.
Exploration well. A well drilled to
find and produce oil or natural gas reserves that is not a
development well. For internal reporting and budgeting purposes,
we exclude exploitation activities from exploration activities.
Farm-in or farm-out. An agreement
whereunder the owner of a working interest in an oil and gas
lease assigns the working interest or a portion thereof to
another party who desires to drill on the leased acreage.
Generally, the assignee is required to drill one or more wells
in order to earn its interest in the acreage. The assignor
usually retains a royalty or reversionary interest in the lease.
The interest received by an assignee is a farm-in,
while the interest transferred by the assignor is a
farm-out.
FERC. The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
FPSO. A floating production, storage
and off-loading vessel commonly used overseas to produce oil
from locations where pipeline infrastructure is not available.
44
Field. An area consisting of a single
reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature or
stratigraphic condition.
Gross acres or gross wells. The total
acres or wells in which we own a working interest.
MBbls. One thousand barrels of crude
oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet.
Mcfe. One thousand cubic feet
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas
to one barrel of crude oil or condensate.
MMS. The Minerals Management Service of
the United States Department of the Interior.
MMBbls. One million barrels of crude
oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
MMcf. One million cubic feet.
MMcfe. One million cubic feet
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas
to one barrel of crude oil or condensate.
Net acres or net wells. The sum of the
fractional working interests we own in gross acres or gross
wells, as the case may be.
NYMEX. The New York Mercantile Exchange.
Probable reserves. Reserves which
analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering
data does not demonstrate to be proved under current technology
and existing economic conditions, but where such analysis
suggests the likelihood of their existence and future recovery.
Productive well. A well that is found
to be capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities
such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed
production expenses and taxes.
Proved developed producing
reserves. Proved developed reserves that are
expected to be recovered from completion intervals currently
open in existing wells and capable of production to market.
Proved developed reserves. In general,
proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered from
existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
The SEC provides a complete definition of proved developed
reserves in
Rule 4-10(a)(3)
of
Regulation S-X.
Proved developed nonproducing
reserves. Proved developed reserves expected
to be recovered from zones behind casing in existing wells.
Proved reserves. In general, the
estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with
reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions. The SEC provides a complete definition of proved
reserves in
Rule 4-10(a)(2)
of
Regulation S-X.
Proved undeveloped reserves. In
general, proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from
new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a
relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. The
SEC provides a complete definition of proved undeveloped
reserves in
Rule 4-10(a)(4)
of
Regulation S-X.
Shelf. The U.S. Outer Continental
Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. Water depths generally range from
50 feet to 1,000 feet.
Tcfe. One trillion cubic feet
equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas
to one barrel of crude oil or condensate.
45
Undeveloped acreage. Lease acreage on
which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that
would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and
natural gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved
reserves.
Working interest. The operating
interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and
conduct operating activities on the property and a share of
production.
Workover. Operations on a producing
well to restore or increase production.
46
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in oil and gas
prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as
discussed below.
Oil and
Gas Prices
We generally hedge a substantial, but varying, portion of our
anticipated oil and gas production for the next
12-24 months
as part of our risk management program. In the case of
acquisitions, we may hedge acquired production for a longer
period. We use hedging to reduce price volatility, help ensure
that we have adequate cash flow to fund our capital programs and
manage price risks and returns on some of our acquisitions and
drilling programs. Our decision on the quantity and price at
which we choose to hedge our production is based in part on our
view of current and future market conditions. While hedging
limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it may also
limit future revenues from favorable price movements. For a
further discussion of our hedging activities, see the
information under the caption Oil and Gas Hedging in
Item 7 of this report and Note 5, Commodity
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to our
consolidated financial statements.
Interest
Rates
At December 31, 2006, our current and long-term debt was
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
Rate Debt
|
|
|
Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Bank revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
7.45% Senior Notes due
2007(1)(2)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
75/8% Senior
Notes due
2011(1)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current and long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$50 million principal amount of our 7.45% Senior Notes
due 2007 and $50 million principal amount of our
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011 are subject to interest rate swaps. These swaps
provide for us to pay variable and receive fixed interest
payments, and are designated as fair value hedges of a portion
of our outstanding senior notes. |
|
(2) |
|
Classified as current debt on our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2006. |
We consider our interest rate exposure to be minimal because as
of December 31, 2006 about 91% of our long-term debt
obligations, after taking into account our interest rate swap
agreements, were at fixed rates. The impact on annual cash flow
of a 10% change in the floating rate applicable to our variable
rate debt would be less than $1 million.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rates
The British pound is the functional currency for our operations
in the United Kingdom. The functional currency for all other
foreign operations is the U.S. dollar. To the extent that
business transactions in these countries are not denominated in
the respective countrys functional currency, we are
exposed to foreign currency exchange risk. We consider our
current risk exposure to exchange rate movements, based on net
cash flows, to be immaterial. We did not have any open
derivative contracts relating to foreign currencies at
December 31, 2006.
47
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
INDEX
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
48
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our companys management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of our financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Under the supervision and with
the participation of our companys management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, we
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our
assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a
material effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control Integrated Framework, the management of
our company concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
The assessment by the management of our company of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report that follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Trice
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Terry W. Rathert
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Houston, Texas
March 1, 2007
49
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Newfield
Exploration Company:
We have completed integrated audits of Newfield Exploration
Companys 2006 consolidated financial statements and of its
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions,
based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated
financial statements
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of income, of
stockholders equity and of cash flows present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Newfield
Exploration Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
stock-based compensation effective January 1, 2006 in
conjunction with the Companys adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
Internal
control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting, that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects,
based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on managements
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An
audit of internal control over financial reporting includes
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company;
50
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Houston, Texas
March 1, 2007
51
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (full cost
method, of which $1,002 and $901 were excluded from amortization
at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively)
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
7,042
|
|
Less accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
(2,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
4,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment,
net
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,635
|
|
|
$
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Current debt
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Advances from joint owners
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.01 par
value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value,
200,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2006 and
2005; 131,063,555 and 129,356,162 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
Treasury stock (at cost, 1,879,874
and 1,815,594 shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Commodity derivatives
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,635
|
|
|
$
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of this statement.
52
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Commodity derivative income
(expense)
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding for diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of this statement.
53
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2003
|
|
|
114.2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
636
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, less
amortization and cancellations
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax of ($1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Reclassification adjustments for
settled hedging positions, net of tax of $31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Changes in fair value of
outstanding hedging positions, net of tax of ($45)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2004
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, less
amortization and cancellations
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Amortization of stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax of $3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments for
settled hedging positions, net of tax of $60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments for
discontinued cash flow hedges, net of tax of $3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Changes in fair value of
outstanding hedging positions, net of tax of ($41)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2005
|
|
|
129.4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, less
amortization and cancellations
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Amortization of stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation excess tax
benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of
tax of $1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax of ($10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Reclassification adjustments for
settled hedging positions, net of tax of $16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Changes in fair value of
outstanding hedging positions, net of tax of ($35)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2006
|
|
|
131.1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of this statement.
54
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Commodity derivative (income)
expense
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment (gain on sale) of
floating production system and pipelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Early redemption cost on senior
subordinated notes
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts
receivable
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Increase in inventories
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other
current assets
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Increase in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Decrease in commodity derivative
liabilities
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Increase in advances from joint
owners
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
Purchase of business, net of cash
acquired of $2 for 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas
properties
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Proceeds from sale of floating
production system and pipelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to furniture, fixtures
and equipment
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of short-term
investments
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(1,662
|
)
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings under
credit arrangements
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
Repayments of borrowings under
credit arrangements
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(1,229
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuances of common
stock
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior
subordinated notes
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Repayments of senior subordinated
notes
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of secured notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation excess
tax benefit
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of this statement.
55
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
|
Organization
and Principles of Consolidation
We are an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
exploration, development and acquisition of crude oil and
natural gas properties. Our diversified domestic areas of
operation include the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins of the
Mid-Continent, the onshore Gulf Coast, the Uinta Basin of the
Rocky Mountains and the Gulf of Mexico. Internationally, we are
active offshore Malaysia and China and in the U.K. North Sea.
Our financial statements include the accounts of Newfield
Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation, and its
subsidiaries. We proportionately consolidate our interests in
oil and gas exploration and production ventures and partnerships
in accordance with industry practice. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires,
all references in these notes to Newfield,
we, us or our are to
Newfield Exploration Company and its subsidiaries.
Common
Stock Split
Following the close of trading on May 25, 2005, we
completed a
two-for-one
split of our common stock. The split was effected by a common
stock dividend. As a result, the stated par value per share of
our common stock was not changed from $0.01. These financial
statements and notes have been restated to retroactively reflect
the stock split.
Dependence
on Oil and Gas Prices
As an independent oil and gas producer, our revenue,
profitability and future rate of growth are substantially
dependent on prevailing prices for natural gas and oil. The
energy markets have historically been very volatile, and there
can be no assurance that oil and gas prices will not be subject
to wide fluctuations in the future. A substantial or extended
decline in oil or gas prices could have a material adverse
effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash
flows and access to capital and on the quantities of oil and gas
reserves that we can economically produce.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires our management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period and the
reported amounts of proved oil and gas reserves. Actual results
could differ from these estimates. Our most significant
financial estimates are based on our proved oil and gas reserves.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years
reported amounts in order to conform with the current year
presentation. These reclassifications did not impact our net
income, stockholders equity or cash flows.
Revenue
Recognition
Substantially all of our natural gas and oil production is sold
to a variety of purchasers under short-term (less than
12 months) contracts at market sensitive prices. We record
revenue when we deliver our production to the customer and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues from the
production of oil and gas on properties in which we have joint
ownership are recorded under the sales method. Differences
between these sales and our entitled share of production are not
significant.
56
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Insurance
Recoveries
On August 11, 2006, we reached an agreement with our
insurance underwriters to settle all claims related to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (business interruption, property
damage and control of well/operators extra expense) for
$235 million. Based on the nature of the coverage provided
under the policies, the settlement proceeds were recorded as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a cumulative inception to date credit of $58 million to
other operating expense for amounts attributable to business
interruption coverage;
|
|
|
|
a credit of $48 million to our domestic full cost pool for
amounts attributable to property damage coverage; and
|
|
|
|
a cumulative credit of $129 million to lease operating
expense for amounts attributable to all other hurricane repair
and cleanup related coverage.
|
In our consolidated statement of cash flows the cash related to
the settlement of the property damage portion of our policies is
reflected as a source of investing cash flows and the cash
related to the settlement of our business interruption policy
and our control of well/operators extra expense policies
is reflected as a source of operating cash flows. All remaining
costs expected to be incurred in future periods related to the
hurricanes will be accounted for based on the nature of the cost
(i.e. capitalized to the extent related to field redevelopment
and expensed to the extent related to repair or debris removal).
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with
a maturity of three months or less when acquired and are stated
at cost, which approximates fair value. We invest cash in excess
of near-term capital and operating requirements in
U.S. Treasury Notes, Eurodollar time deposits and money
market funds which are classified as cash on our consolidated
balance sheet.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We routinely assess the recoverability of all material trade and
other receivables to determine their collectibility. Many of our
receivables are from joint interest owners of properties we
operate. Thus, we may have the ability to withhold future
revenue disbursements to recover any non-payment of joint
interest billings. Generally, our natural gas and crude oil
receivables are collected within
45-60 days
of production.
We accrue a reserve on a receivable when, based on the judgment
of management, it is probable that a receivable will not be
collected and the amount of the reserve may be reasonably
estimated. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, our allowance
for doubtful accounts was immaterial.
Investments
Investments consist of highly liquid investment grade commercial
paper and municipal and corporate bonds with a maturity of less
than one year. These investments are classified as
available-for-sale. Accordingly, unrealized gains
and losses and the related deferred income tax effects are
excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of
stockholders equity. Realized gains or losses are computed
based on specific identification of the securities sold.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of tubular goods and well
equipment held for use in our oil and gas operations and oil
produced in our operations offshore Malaysia and China but not
sold. Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market.
Crude oil from our operations offshore Malaysia and China is
produced into
57
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
floating production, storage and off-loading vessels and sold
periodically as barge quantities are accumulated. The product
inventory consisted of approximately 176,000 barrels and
36,000 barrels of crude oil valued at cost of
$5 million and $0.7 million at December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. Cost for purposes of the carrying value
of oil inventory is the sum of production costs and
depreciation, depletion and amortization expense.
Foreign
Currency
The British pound is the functional currency for our operations
in the United Kingdom. Translation adjustments resulting from
translating our United Kingdom subsidiaries British pound
financial statements into U.S. dollars are included as
accumulated other comprehensive income on our consolidated
balance sheet and statement of stockholders equity. The
functional currency for all other foreign operations is the
U.S. dollar. Gains and losses incurred on currency
transactions in other than a countrys functional currency
are recorded under the caption Other income
(expense) Other on our consolidated statement
of income.
Oil
and Gas Properties
We use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas
producing activities. Under this method, all costs incurred in
the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas
properties, including salaries, benefits and other internal
costs directly attributable to these activities, are capitalized
into cost centers that are established on a
country-by-country
basis. We capitalized $58 million, $46 million and
$32 million of internal costs in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Interest expense related to unproved properties
also is capitalized into oil and gas properties.
Capitalized costs and estimated future development and
retirement costs are amortized on a
unit-of-production
method based on proved reserves associated with the applicable
cost center. For each cost center, the net capitalized costs of
oil and gas properties are limited to the lower of the
unamortized cost or the cost center ceiling. A particular cost
center ceiling is equal to the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
the present value (10% per annum discount rate) of
estimated future net revenues from proved reserves using end of
period oil and gas prices applicable to our reserves (including
the effects of hedging contracts that are designated for hedge
accounting); plus
|
|
|
|
the lower of cost or estimated fair value of properties not
included in the costs being amortized, if any; less
|
|
|
|
related income tax effects.
|
Proceeds from the sale of oil and gas properties are applied to
reduce the costs in the applicable cost center unless the sale
involves a significant quantity of reserves in relation to the
cost center, in which case a gain or loss is recognized.
If net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties exceed the
cost center ceiling, we are subject to a ceiling test writedown
to the extent of such excess. If required, a ceiling test
writedown would reduce earnings and stockholders equity in
the period of occurrence and result in lower depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense in future periods.
The risk that we will be required to writedown the carrying
value of our oil and gas properties increases when oil and gas
prices decrease significantly or if we have substantial downward
revisions in our estimated proved reserves. At December 31,
2006, the ceiling value of our reserves was calculated based
upon quoted market prices of $5.64 per MMBtu for gas and
$61.05 per barrel for oil, adjusted for market
differentials. Using these prices, the unamortized net
capitalized costs of our domestic oil and gas properties would
have exceeded the ceiling amount by approximately
$5 million (net of tax of $3 million) at
December 31, 2006. Cash flow hedges of oil production in
place at December 31, 2006 decreased the calculated ceiling
value by
58
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
approximately $5 million (net of tax of $3 million).
However, on February 22, 2007, the market price for gas
(Gas Daily Henry Hub) increased to $7.48 per MMBtu
and the market price for oil (Platts WTI at
Cushing) decreased to $60.95 per barrel. Utilizing these prices,
the unamortized costs of our oil and gas properties would not
have exceeded the ceiling amount at December 31, 2006. As a
result, we did not record a writedown in the fourth quarter of
2006. The ceiling value calculated using the February 22,
2007 prices includes approximately $5 million (net of tax
of $3 million) related to the negative effects of cash flow
hedges of oil production.
In September 2006, we decided to cease our exploration efforts
in Brazil. As a result, we recognized a ceiling test writedown
of $6 million for our Brazil cost center in the third
quarter of 2006.
In December 2005, we decided to decrease our emphasis on
exploration efforts in Brazil and to no longer pursue
opportunities in several other countries. As a result, we
recognized a ceiling test writedown of $10 million in the
fourth quarter of 2005. In November 2004, we announced that our
Cumbria Prospect in the U.K. North Sea was a dry hole. Because
the unamortized costs of our U.K. cost pool at that time
exceeded the full cost ceiling, we recognized a ceiling test
writedown of $17 million in 2004.
Furniture,
Fixtures and Equipment
Furniture, fixtures and equipment are recorded at cost and are
depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives, which range from three to seven years. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, furniture, fixtures and
equipment of $53 million and $39 million,
respectively, are presented net of accumulated depreciation of
$25 million and $19 million, respectively.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
If a reasonable estimate of the fair value of an obligation to
perform site reclamation, dismantle facilities or plug and
abandon wells can be made, we record a liability (an asset
retirement obligation or ARO) on our consolidated balance sheet
and capitalize the asset retirement cost in oil and gas
properties in the period in which the retirement obligation is
incurred. In general, the amount of an ARO and the costs
capitalized will be equal to the estimated future cost to
satisfy the abandonment obligation assuming the normal operation
of the asset, using current prices that are escalated by an
assumed inflation factor up to the estimated settlement date,
which is then discounted back to the date that the abandonment
obligation was incurred using an assumed cost of funds for our
company. After recording these amounts, the ARO is accreted to
its future estimated value using the same assumed cost of funds
and the additional capitalized costs are depreciated on a
unit-of-production
basis within the related full cost pool. Both the accretion and
the depreciation are included in depreciation, depletion and
amortization on our consolidated statement of income.
59
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The change in our ARO for the three years ended
December 31, 2006 is set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
11
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
48
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
217
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
13
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
10
|
|
Revisions(1)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
260
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
14
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
19
|
|
Revisions
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of ARO at
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects an increase in the abandonment estimate of Gulf of
Mexico platforms and facilities that were damaged or destroyed
by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. |
Goodwill
We recorded goodwill in connection with our acquisitions of
Inland Resources (August 2004) and a company holding
Mid-Continent
oil and gas properties (2003). Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets
acquired net of the fair value of the liabilities assumed. In
the third quarter of 2005, the goodwill associated with Inland
Resources was adjusted to reflect the recognition of an
additional $3 million in tax assets.
We assess the carrying amount of goodwill by testing the
goodwill for impairment. The impairment test requires the
allocation of goodwill and all other assets and liabilities to
reporting units. We have deemed each country to be a goodwill
reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit is
determined and compared to the book value of that reporting
unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
book value (including goodwill) then goodwill is reduced to its
implied fair value and the amount of the writedown is charged to
earnings. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis
on December 31, or more frequently if an event occurs or
circumstances change that have an adverse effect on the fair
value of the reporting unit such that the fair value could be
less than the book value of such unit.
The fair value of a reporting unit is based on our estimates of
future net cash flows from proved reserves and from future
exploration for and development of unproved reserves. Downward
revisions of estimated reserves or production, increases in
estimated future costs or decreases in oil and gas prices could
lead to an impairment of all or a portion of goodwill in future
periods.
We have not impaired any goodwill.
Income
Taxes
We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined by applying tax regulations existing at the end of a
reporting period to the cumulative
60
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in our financial
statements. A valuation allowance is established to reduce
deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the
related tax benefits will not be realized.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for
how companies should recognize, measure, present and disclose in
their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax
positions are recognized in our consolidated financial
statements as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater
than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with
tax authorities assuming full knowledge of the position and all
relevant facts. These amounts are subsequently reevaluated and
changes are recognized as adjustments to current period tax
expense. FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements to
include an annual tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax
benefits. We are required to adopt FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. Upon adoption, we will be required to
apply the provisions of FIN 48 to all tax positions and any
cumulative effect adjustment will be recognized as an adjustment
to retained earnings. We have completed our initial evaluation
of the impact of FIN 48 and determined that its adoption is
not expected to have a material impact on our financial position
or results of operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment,
(SFAS No. 123(R)) to account for stock-based
compensation. Among other items, SFAS No. 123(R)
eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method
of accounting and requires companies to recognize in their
financial statements the cost of services received in exchange
for awards of equity instruments based on the grant date fair
value of those awards. We elected to use the modified
prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation
expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other
equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of
adoption. For all unvested options outstanding as of
January 1, 2006, the previously measured but unrecognized
compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original
grant date, has been or will be recognized in our financial
statements over the remaining vesting period. For equity-based
compensation awards granted or modified subsequent to
January 1, 2006, compensation expense, based on the fair
value on the date of grant or modification, has been or will be
recognized in our financial statements over the vesting period.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the
fair value of stock options and a lattice-based model for our
performance and market-based restricted shares. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we followed the intrinsic
value method in accordance with APB 25 to account for
stock-based compensation. Prior period financial statements have
not been restated. See Note 11, Stock-Based
Compensation, for a full discussion of our stock-based
compensation.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
We operate a substantial portion of our oil and gas properties.
As the operator of a property, we make full payment for costs
associated with the property and seek reimbursement from the
other working interest owners in the property for their share of
those costs. Our joint interest partners consist primarily of
independent oil and gas producers. If the oil and gas
exploration and production industry in general was adversely
affected, the ability of our joint interest partners to
reimburse us could be adversely affected.
The purchasers of our oil and gas production consist primarily
of independent marketers, major oil and gas companies, refiners
and gas pipeline companies. We perform credit evaluations of the
purchasers of our production and monitor their financial
condition on an ongoing basis. Based on our evaluations and
monitoring, we obtain cash escrows, letters of credit or
parental guarantees from some purchasers. Historically, we have
sold a substantial portion of our oil and gas production to
several purchasers (see Major
Customers below). We have not experienced any
significant losses from uncollectible accounts.
61
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
All of our hedging transactions have been carried out in the
over-the-counter
market. The use of hedging transactions involves the risk that
the counterparties may be unable to meet the financial terms of
the transactions. The counterparties for all of our hedging
transactions have an investment grade credit rating.
We monitor on an ongoing basis the credit ratings of our hedging
counterparties. At December 31, 2006, Bank of Montreal,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, Citibank, N.A. and J Aron &
Company were the counterparties with respect to 73% of our
future hedged production.
Major
Customers
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we
sold oil and gas production that accounted for more than 10% of
our consolidated revenues (before the effects of hedging) to
Superior Natural Gas Corporation (18% in 2006, 23% in 2005 and
20% in 2004), Louis Dreyfus Energy Services (less than 10% in
2006, 12% in 2005 and 15% in 2004) and ConocoPhillips Inc.
(less than 10% in 2006 and 2005 and 14% in 2004). We believe
that the loss of any of these purchasers would not have a
material adverse effect on us because alternative purchasers of
this production are readily available.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We account for our derivative activities under the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by
SFAS Nos. 137, 138 and 149. The statement, as amended,
establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that
every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as
either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. The
statement requires that changes in the derivatives fair
value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge
accounting criteria are met. Substantially all of the derivative
instruments that we utilize are to manage the price risk
attributable to our expected oil and gas production. We also
have utilized derivatives to manage our exposure associated with
interest rates (see Note 8, Debt
Interest Rate Swaps).
Historically, we applied hedge accounting to derivatives
utilized to manage price risk associated with our oil and gas
production. Accordingly, we recorded changes in the fair value
of our collar and floor contracts (other than contracts that are
part of three-way collar contracts), including changes
associated with time value, under the caption Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) Commodity
derivatives on our consolidated balance sheet. Gains or
losses on these collar and floor contracts are reclassified out
of Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) Commodity derivatives and into oil and
gas revenues when the forecasted sale of production occurs.
Any hedge ineffectiveness associated with contracts qualifying
for and designated as a cash flow hedge (which represents the
amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative
differs from the change in the cash flows of the forecasted sale
of production) is reported currently each period under the
caption Commodity derivative income (expense) on our
consolidated statement of income.
Some of our derivatives (three-way collar contracts) do not
qualify for hedge accounting but are effective as economic
hedges of our commodity price exposure. These contracts are
accounted for using the
mark-to-market
accounting method. Under this method, the contracts are carried
at their fair value on our consolidated balance sheet under the
captions Derivative assets and Derivative
liabilities. We recognize all unrealized and realized
gains and losses related to these contracts on our consolidated
statement of income under the caption Commodity derivative
income (expense).
Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2005, we elected not to
designate any future price risk management activities as
accounting hedges under SFAS No. 133, and accordingly,
account for them using the
mark-to-market
accounting method described above. We continue to account for
previously designated and qualifying derivatives as cash flow
hedges.
62
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The related cash flow impact of all of our derivative activities
are reflected as cash flows from operating activities. See
Note 5, Commodity Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, for a full discussion of our hedging
activities.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings (loss) as well
as unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments and
cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, all
recorded net of tax.
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net
income (the numerator) by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock (other than unvested restricted stock)
outstanding during the period (the denominator). Diluted
earnings per share incorporates the dilutive impact of
outstanding stock options and unvested restricted shares (using
the treasury stock method). See Note 11, Stock-Based
Compensation.
The following is the calculation of basic and diluted weighted
average shares outstanding and EPS for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Income (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic and
diluted
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
(denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares basic
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Dilution effect of stock options
and unvested restricted shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares diluted
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of shares outstanding for diluted EPS for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 does not
include the effect of 137 thousand, 69 thousand and 728
thousand outstanding stock options and unvested restricted
shares, respectively, because to do so would be antidilutive.
Malaysian
PSCs
Over the past several years, we have entered into several
production sharing contracts, or PSCs, with Malaysias
state-owned oil company relating to blocks offshore Malaysia and
Sarawak.
In May 2004, we entered into several PSCs that relate to two
blocks PM 318 and deepwater Block 2C. Petronas
Carigali, a state-owned, Malaysian exploration and production
company, operates PM 318, which consists of approximately
414,000 acres, located offshore Peninsular Malaysia. We
have a 50% interest in the block. The consideration for our
interests in PM 318 was comprised of a one-time reimbursement of
sunk costs of $39 million and a deferred payment of
$11 million. Block 2C covers 1.1 million acres in
deepwater offshore Sarawak. In November 2006, we farmed out 20%
of our interest in Block 2C. Block 2C is operated by
us with a 40% interest. We have committed to future exploration
on these two blocks.
63
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In June 2005, we entered into a PSC with respect to PM 323. We
operate the block with a 60% interest. The PSC covers
approximately 320,000 acres in the Malay Basin and is
located approximately 40 miles from PM 318. The
consideration for our interest was comprised of a deferred
payment of $8 million and a future development and
exploration commitment.
See Note 14, Commitments and
Contingencies Other Commitments.
Oklahoma
Assets
During the second half of 2004, we acquired producing oil and
gas properties in Oklahoma in two separate transactions for
total cash consideration of approximately $58 million.
These acquisitions were financed through cash on hand and
borrowings under our credit arrangements.
Denbury
Offshore, Inc.
On July 20, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding stock
of Denbury Offshore, Inc., the subsidiary of Denbury Resources
Inc. that held substantially all of its Gulf of Mexico assets.
We accounted for the acquisition as a purchase using the
accounting standards established in SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations. Our consolidated financial
statements include Denbury Offshores results of operations
subsequent to July 20, 2004. After purchase price
adjustments, total consideration was approximately
$174 million, substantially all of which was allocated to
oil and gas properties. The acquisition was financed through
cash on hand and borrowings under our credit arrangements.
Inland
Resources Inc.
On August 27, 2004, we completed the $575 million
acquisition of privately held Inland Resources Inc.
Inlands sole oil and gas property was the 100,000
acre Monument Butte Field, located in the Uinta Basin of
northeast Utah. The purchase price was funded through concurrent
offerings of our common stock and our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014. See Note 8, Debt,
and Note 9, Common Stock Activity.
We accounted for the acquisition as a purchase using the
accounting standards established in SFAS Nos. 141 and 142.
Our consolidated financial statements include Inlands
results of operations subsequent to August 27, 2004. We
recorded the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed at August 27, 2004, which primarily
consisted of oil and gas properties of $723 million, a
deferred tax liability of $171 million, derivative
liabilities of $31 million and goodwill of
$49 million. We recorded the deferred tax liability to
recognize the difference between the historical tax basis of
Inlands net assets and the acquisition costs recorded for
accounting purposes. Inlands historical book value of the
proved and unproved oil and gas properties was increased to
estimated fair value and goodwill was recorded to recognize this
tax basis differential. In the third quarter of 2005, goodwill
was reduced to reflect the recognition of an additional
$3 million tax asset related to the acquisition. Goodwill
is not deductible for tax purposes. See Note 1,
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Goodwill.
Pro
Forma Results
The unaudited pro forma results presented below for the year
ended December 31, 2004 have been prepared to give effect
to our 2004 acquisitions and the issuance of our common stock
and notes as described above on our results of operations under
the purchase method of accounting as if they had been
consummated on January 1, 2004. The unaudited pro forma
results do not purport to represent what our results of
operations actually would have been if these acquisitions had in
fact occurred on such date or to project our results of
operations for any future date or period.
64
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
per share)
|
|
|
Pro forma:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
589
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
344
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
Oil
and Gas Properties
Oil and gas properties consisted of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Subject to amortization
|
|
$
|
7,888
|
|
|
$
|
6,141
|
|
|
$
|
5,073
|
|
Not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration in progress
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Development in progress
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Fee mineral interests
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other capital costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred in 2006
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred in 2005
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred in 2004
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Incurred in 2003 and prior
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total not subject to amortization
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross oil and gas properties
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
7,042
|
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
Accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
(2,632
|
)
|
|
|
(2,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
5,655
|
|
|
$
|
4,410
|
|
|
$
|
3,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of incurred (if not previously included in the
amortization base) and future development costs associated with
qualifying major development projects may be temporarily
excluded from amortization. To qualify, a project must require
significant costs to ascertain the quantities of proved reserves
attributable to the properties under development (e.g., the
installation of an offshore production platform from which
development wells are to be drilled). Incurred and future costs
are allocated between completed and future work. Any temporarily
excluded costs are included in the amortization base upon the
earlier of when the associated reserves are determined to be
proved or impairment is indicated. As of December 31, 2006
and 2005, we excluded from the amortization base
$26 million (which is included in costs not subject to
amortization in the table above) associated with our deepwater
Gulf of Mexico project known as Glider, located at
Green Canyon 247/248.
65
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We believe that substantially all of the properties associated
with costs not currently subject to amortization will be
evaluated within four years except the Monument Butte Field.
Because of its size (100,000 acres), evaluation of the
Monument Butte Field in its entirety will take significantly
longer than four years. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, $292 million, $316 million and
$341 million, respectively, of costs associated with the
Monument Butte Field were not subject to amortization.
Malaysia
Block 2C
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we sold a 20% interest in
Block 2C in deepwater offshore Sarawak. The sales proceeds
of $4 million have been recorded as an adjustment to our
Malaysia cost center.
U.K.
Southern Gas Basin Sale Agreement
In September 2006, we sold a 15% interest in our Grove Field and
recorded sales proceeds of $17 million as an adjustment to
our U.K. cost center. As part of the sale, the purchaser agreed
to participate in the ongoing development of our Grove Field and
our 2007 exploration and appraisal drilling program.
Floating
Production System and Pipelines
As a result of our acquisition of EEX Corporation in November
2002, we owned a 60% interest in a floating production system,
some offshore pipelines and a processing facility located at the
end of the pipelines in shallow water. At the time of
acquisition, we estimated the fair value of these assets to be
$35 million.
From their acquisition, we undertook to sell these assets. In
December 2004, when what we believed was the last commercial
opportunity for sale was not realized, we determined that there
was no active market for these assets. As a result, in
connection with the preparation of our financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded a
$35 million impairment charge under the caption
Operating expenses Other on our
consolidated statement of income. In August 2005, we sold our
interest in the floating production facility and related
equipment for net proceeds of $7 million, which were
recorded as a gain under the caption Operating
expenses Other on our consolidated statement
of income.
|
|
5.
|
Commodity
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
|
We utilize swap, floor, collar and three-way collar derivative
contracts to hedge against the variability in cash flows
associated with the forecasted sale of our future oil and gas
production. While the use of these derivative instruments limits
the downside risk of adverse price movements, their use also may
limit future revenues from favorable price movements.
With respect to a swap contract, the counterparty is required to
make a payment to us if the settlement price for any settlement
period is less than the swap price for such contract, and we are
required to make a payment to the counterparty if the settlement
price for any settlement period is greater than the swap price
for such contract. For a floor contract, the counterparty is
required to make a payment to us if the settlement price for any
settlement period is below the floor price for such contract. We
are not required to make any payment in connection with the
settlement of a floor contract. For a collar contract, the
counterparty is required to make a payment to us if the
settlement price for any settlement period is below the floor
price for such contract, we are required to make a payment to
the counterparty if the settlement price for any settlement
period is above the ceiling price for such contract and neither
party is required to make a payment to the other party if the
settlement price for any settlement period is equal to or
greater than the floor price and equal to or less than the
ceiling price for such contract. A three-way collar contract
consists of a standard collar contract plus a put sold by us
with a price below the floor price of the collar. This
additional put requires us to make a payment to the counterparty
if the settlement price for any settlement period is below the
put price. Combining the collar contract with the additional put
results in us being entitled to a net payment equal to the
difference
66
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
between the floor price of the standard collar and the
additional put price if the settlement price is equal to or less
than the additional put price. If the settlement price is
greater than the additional put price, the result is the same as
it would have been with a standard collar contract only. This
strategy enables us to increase the floor and the ceiling price
of the collar beyond the range of a traditional no cost collar
while defraying the associated cost with the sale of the
additional put.
Substantially all of our oil and gas derivative contracts are
settled based upon reported prices on the NYMEX. The estimated
fair value of these contracts is based upon various factors,
including closing exchange prices on the NYMEX,
over-the-counter
quotations, volatility and, in the case of collars and floors,
the time value of options. The calculation of the fair value of
collars and floors requires the use of an option-pricing model.
Cash
Flow Hedges
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2005, all derivatives that
qualified for hedge accounting were designated on the date we
entered into the contract as a hedge of the variability in cash
flows associated with the forecasted sale of our future oil and
gas production. After-tax changes in the fair value of a
derivative that is highly effective and is designated and
qualifies as a cash flow hedge, to the extent that the hedge is
effective, are recorded under the caption Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) Commodity
derivatives on our consolidated balance sheet until the
sale of the hedged oil and gas production. Upon the sale of the
hedged production, the net after-tax change in the fair value of
the associated derivative recorded under the caption
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Commodity derivatives is reversed and the gain or loss on
the hedge, to the extent that it is effective, is reported in
Oil and gas revenues on our consolidated statement
of income. At December 31, 2006, we had a net
$5 million after-tax loss recorded under the caption
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Commodity derivatives. We expect hedged production
associated with commodity derivatives accounting for such net
loss to be sold within the next 12 months. The actual gain
or loss on these commodity derivatives could vary significantly
as a result of changes in market conditions and other factors.
For those contracts designated as a cash flow hedge, we formally
document all relationships between the derivative instruments
and the hedged production, as well as our risk management
objective and strategy for the particular derivative contracts.
This process includes linking all derivatives that are
designated as cash flow hedges to the specific forecasted sale
of oil or gas at its physical location. We also formally assess
(both at the derivatives inception and on an ongoing
basis) whether the derivatives being utilized have been highly
effective at offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged
production and whether those derivatives may be expected to
remain highly effective in future periods. If it is determined
that a derivative has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge,
we will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. If hedge
accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains
outstanding, we will carry the derivative at its fair value on
our consolidated balance sheet and recognize all subsequent
changes in its fair value on our consolidated statement of
income for the period in which the change occurs.
67
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding contracts that
qualify and were designated as cash flow hedges with respect to
our future production as follows:
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Contract Price per Bbl
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Floors
|
|
|
Ceilings
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
Volume in
|
|
|
(Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
Period and Type of Contract
|
|
MBbls
|
|
|
Average)
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
January 2007 March 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
41.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.00 - $55.00
|
|
|
$
|
52.50
|
|
|
$
|
77.10 -$83.25
|
|
|
$
|
80.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2007 June 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
41.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00 - 55.00
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
77.10 -83.25
|
|
|
|
80.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2007 September 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
61.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00 - 55.00
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
77.10 -83.25
|
|
|
|
80.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2007 December
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
61.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00 - 55.00
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
77.10 -83.25
|
|
|
|
80.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Derivative Contracts
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, we elected not to
designate any additional swap, collar and floor contracts that
were entered into subsequent to September 30, 2005 as
accounting hedges under SFAS No. 133. These contracts,
as well as our three-way contracts that do not qualify as cash
flow hedges, are carried at their fair value on our consolidated
balance sheet under the captions Derivative assets
and Derivative liabilities. We recognize all
unrealized and realized gains and losses related to these
contracts on our consolidated statement of income under the
caption Commodity derivative income (expense).
Settlements of such derivative contracts are included in
operating cash flows on our consolidated statement of cash flows.
68
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding contracts with
respect to our future production that are not accounted for as
hedges as set forth in the tables below.
Natural
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Contract Price per MMBtu
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Floors
|
|
|
Ceilings
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
Volume in
|
|
|
(Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
Period and Type of Contract
|
|
MMBtus
|
|
|
Average)
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
January 2007 March 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
9,730
|
|
|
$
|
9.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
29,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.00 - $10.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
$
|
11.00 -$15.75
|
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
April 2007 June 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
23,980
|
|
|
|
8.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
19,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
8.23 -10.15
|
|
|
|
8.81
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
July 2007 September 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
24,270
|
|
|
|
8.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
15,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
8.23 -10.15
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
October 2007 December
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
9,890
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
11,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
7.53
|
|
|
|
8.23 -12.40
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
January 2008 December
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
8,080
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
13,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
7.76
|
|
|
|
9.70 -12.40
|
|
|
|
11.04
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX Contract Price per Bbl
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Additional Put
|
|
|
Floors
|
|
|
Ceilings
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
Volume in
|
|
|
(Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
Period and Type of Contract
|
|
MBbls
|
|
|
Average)
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
January 2007 March 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$60.00
|
|
|
$
|
60.00
|
|
|
$
|
80.50 - $81.00
|
|
|
$
|
80.75
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.00 - $50.00
|
|
|
$
|
30.03
|
|
|
|
32.00 - 60.00
|
|
|
|
37.14
|
|
|
|
44.70 - 82.00
|
|
|
|
55.35
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
April 2007 June 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
80.50 - 81.00
|
|
|
|
80.75
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 - 50.00
|
|
|
|
30.02
|
|
|
|
32.00 -60.00
|
|
|
|
37.12
|
|
|
|
44.70 - 82.00
|
|
|
|
55.33
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
July 2007 September 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
80.50 - 81.00
|
|
|
|
80.75
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 - 50.00
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
32.00 -60.00
|
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
|
|
44.70 - 82.00
|
|
|
|
55.31
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
October 2007 December
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap contracts
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collar contracts
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
60.00
|
|
|
|
80.50 - 81.00
|
|
|
|
80.75
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 - 50.00
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
32.00 -60.00
|
|
|
|
37.10
|
|
|
|
44.70 - 82.00
|
|
|
|
55.31
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
January 2008 December
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
3,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 - 29.00
|
|
|
|
26.56
|
|
|
|
32.00 -35.00
|
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
49.50 - 52.90
|
|
|
|
50.29
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
January 2009 December
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 - 30.00
|
|
|
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
32.00 -36.00
|
|
|
|
33.33
|
|
|
|
50.00 - 54.55
|
|
|
|
50.62
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
January 2010 December
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Way collar contracts
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.00 - 32.00
|
|
|
|
28.60
|
|
|
|
32.00 -38.00
|
|
|
|
34.90
|
|
|
|
50.00 - 53.50
|
|
|
|
51.52
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Derivative Income
(Expense). The following table presents
information about the components of commodity derivative income
(expense) for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Other derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized loss on settlement of
discontinued cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) due to
changes in fair market value
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Realized gain (loss) on settlement
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commodity derivative income
(expense)
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
(322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge ineffectiveness is associated with our hedging contracts
that qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133.
As a result of the production deferrals experienced in the Gulf
of Mexico related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, hedge
accounting was discontinued during the third quarter of 2005 on
a portion of our derivative contracts that had previously
qualified as effective cash flow hedges of our Gulf of Mexico
70
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
production and other contracts were redesignated as hedges of
our onshore Gulf Coast production. As a result, realized losses
of $51 million associated with derivative contracts for the
third and fourth quarters of 2005, which were in excess of
hedged physical deliveries for those periods, were reported as
commodity derivative expense. The unrealized gain (loss) due to
changes in fair market value is associated with our derivative
contracts that are not designated for hedge accounting and
represents changes in the fair value of these open contracts
during the period.
As of the indicated dates, our accrued liabilities consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue payable
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
Accrued capital costs
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Accrued lease operating expenses
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Employee incentive expense
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Accrued interest on notes
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Insurance premium payable
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the indicated dates, our accounts receivable consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
Joint interest
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Business interruption insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Receivable from broker
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMS deposits
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Texas severance tax
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of the indicated dates, our debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Senior unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank revolving credit facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime rate based loans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
LIBOR based loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bank revolving credit
facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.45% Senior Notes due
2007(1)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Fair value of interest rate
swaps(2)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Fair value of interest rate
swaps(2)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior unsecured notes
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior unsecured debt
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
Less: Current portion of
debt(1)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due October 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
See Interest Rate Swaps below. |
Credit
Arrangements
In December 2005, we entered into a revolving credit facility
that matures in December 2010. The terms of the credit facility
provide for initial loan commitments of $1 billion from a
syndication of banks, led by JPMorgan Chase as the agent bank.
The loan commitments under the credit facility may be increased
to a maximum aggregate amount of $1.5 billion if the
lenders increase their loan commitments or new financial
institutions are added to the credit facility. Loans under the
credit facility bear interest, at our option, based on
(a) a rate per annum equal to the higher of the prime rate
announced from time to time by JPMorgan Chase Bank or the
weighted average of the rates on overnight federal funds
transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System during
the last preceding business day plus 50 basis points or
(b) a base Eurodollar rate substantially equal to the
London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin that is based on a
grid of our debt rating (100 basis points per annum at
December 31, 2006). At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we
had no borrowings under the credit facility.
Under our new credit facility and our previous credit
facilities, we pay or paid commitment fees on the undrawn
amounts based on a grid of our debt rating (0.20% per annum
at December 31, 2006). We paid fees under these
arrangements of approximately $2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and $1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
72
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The credit facility has restrictive covenants that include the
maintenance of a ratio of total debt to book capitalization not
to exceed 0.6 to 1.0; maintenance of a ratio of total debt to
earnings before gain or loss on the disposition of assets,
interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense, exploration and abandonment expense and
other noncash charges and expenses to consolidated interest
expense of at least 3.5 to 1.0; and, as long as our debt rating
is below investment grade, the maintenance of an annual ratio of
the calculated net present value of our oil and gas properties
to total debt of at least 1.75 to 1.00. At December 31,
2006, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
As of December 31, 2006, we had $52 million of undrawn
letters of credit under our credit facility. The letters of
credit outstanding under the credit facility are subject to
annual fees, based on a grid of our debt rating (87.5 basis
points at December 31, 2006), plus an issuance fee of
12.5 basis points.
We also have a total of $100 million of borrowing capacity
under money market lines of credit with various banks. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had no borrowings under our
money market lines.
Senior
Notes
On October 15, 1997, we issued $125 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.45% Senior Notes due 2007. The
estimated fair value of these notes at December 31, 2006
and 2005 was $126 million and $128 million,
respectively, based on quoted market prices on those dates.
On February 22, 2001, we issued $175 million aggregate
principal amount of our
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011. The estimated fair value of these notes at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $183 million and
$188 million, respectively, based on quoted market prices
on those dates.
Interest on our senior notes is payable semi-annually. Our
senior notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and
rank equally with all of our other existing and future unsecured
and unsubordinated obligations.
We may redeem some or all of our senior notes at any time before
their maturity at a redemption price based on a make-whole
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption. The indentures governing our senior notes contain
covenants that may limit our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur debt secured by certain liens;
|
|
|
|
enter into sale/leaseback transactions; and
|
|
|
|
enter into merger or consolidation transactions.
|
The indentures also provide that if any of our subsidiaries
guarantee any of our indebtedness at any time in the future,
then we will cause our senior notes to be equally and ratably
guaranteed by that subsidiary.
Senior
Subordinated Notes
On August 13, 2002, we issued $250 million aggregate
principal amount of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012. On May 3, 2006, we redeemed
all $250 million principal amount of these notes. The
redemption included a premium related to the early
extinguishment of the notes of $19 million. This premium
and the remaining unamortized original issuance costs of the
notes of $8 million were recorded as an expense under the
caption Operating expenses Other on our
consolidated statement of income.
On August 12, 2004, we issued $325 million aggregate
principal amount of our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014. The net proceeds of
$323 million were used together with the net proceeds of
our concurrent stock offering (see Note 9, Common
Stock Activity) to fund the acquisition of Inland (see
Note 3, Acquisitions). The estimated fair value
of these notes at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was
$323 million and $332 million, respectively, based on
quoted market prices on those dates.
73
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 13, 2006, we issued $550 million aggregate
principal amount of our
65/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016. The net proceeds from the offering
(approximately $545 million) were used to redeem our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012 ($250 million aggregate
principal amount and associated redemption premium as discussed
above) and for general corporate purposes, which included
funding a portion of our 2006 capital program. The estimated
fair value of these notes at December 31, 2006 was
$546 million based on quoted market prices on that date.
Interest on our senior subordinated notes is payable
semi-annually. The notes are unsecured senior subordinated
obligations that rank junior in right of payment to all of our
present and future senior indebtedness.
We may redeem some or all of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 at any time on or after September 1, 2009 and some
or all of our
65/8% notes
due 2016 at any time on or after April 15, 2011, in each
case, at a redemption price stated in the applicable indenture
governing the notes. We may also redeem all but not part of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 prior to September 1, 2009 and all but not part of
our
65/8% notes
due 2016 prior to April 15, 2011, in each case, at a
redemption price based on a make-whole amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, before
September 1, 2007, we may redeem up to 35% of the original
principal amount of our
65/8% notes
due 2014 with the net cash proceeds from certain sales of our
common stock at 106.625% of the principal amount plus accrued
and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. Likewise, before
April 15, 2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the original
principal amount of our
65/8% notes
due 2016 with similar net cash proceeds at 106.625% of the
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption.
The indenture governing our senior subordinated notes limits our
ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt;
|
|
|
|
make restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends on or redeem our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain dispositions of assets;
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
engage in mergers, consolidations and certain sales of assets.
|
Secured
Notes
In connection with our acquisition of EEX Corporation in
November 2002, we assumed $101 million principal amount of
secured notes. The notes accrued interest at a rate of
7.54% per year and were secured by the floating production
system and pipelines described in Note 4, Oil and Gas
Assets Floating Production System and
Pipelines. Prior to 2004, we repaid or repurchased all
but $3 million principal amount of the notes. In January
2004, we repurchased the remaining notes.
Interest
Rate Swaps
During September 2003, we entered into interest rate swap
agreements to take advantage of low interest rates and to obtain
what we viewed as a more desirable proportion of variable and
fixed rate debt. We hedged $50 million principal amount of
our 7.45% Senior Notes due 2007 and $50 million
principal amount of our
75/8% Senior
Notes due 2011. These swap agreements provide for us to pay
variable and receive fixed interest payments and are designated
as fair value hedges of a portion of our outstanding senior
notes.
74
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pursuant to SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value of
derivatives designated as fair value hedges are recognized as
offsets to the changes in fair value of the exposure being
hedged. As a result, the fair value of our interest rate swap
agreements is reflected within our derivative assets or
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet and changes in
their fair value are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying
value of the associated long-term debt. Receipts and payments
related to our interest rate swaps are reflected in interest
expense.
|
|
9.
|
Common
Stock Activity:
|
Following the close of trading on May 25, 2005, we
completed a
two-for-one
split of our common stock. The split was effected by a common
stock dividend.
On August 12, 2004, we issued 5.4 million shares
(10.8 million post split) of our common stock at
$52.85 per share ($26.43 post split). The net proceeds of
$277 million were used in conjunction with the net proceeds
of our concurrent Senior Subordinated Notes offering (see
Note 8, Debt Senior Subordinated
Notes) to acquire Inland (see Note 3,
Acquisitions Inland Resources
Inc.).
Income before income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
949
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Current taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
U.S. state
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
U.S. state
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The provision for income taxes for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006 was different
than the amount computed using the federal statutory rate (35%)
for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Amount computed using the
statutory rate
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes
resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local income taxes, net
of federal effect
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net effect of different tax rates
in non-U.S. jurisdictions
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Tax credits and other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of our deferred tax asset and deferred tax
liability are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(1,231
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,239
|
)
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(1,305
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,313
|
)
|
|
|
(826
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
Less net current deferred tax
asset (liability)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax asset
(liability)
|
|
$
|
(955
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(720
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, we had net operating loss (NOL)
carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of
approximately $388 million and $532 million, respectively, that
may be used in future years to offset taxable income. As of
December 31, 2006, we had NOL carryforwards for
international income tax purposes of approximately
$48 million that may be used in future years to offset
taxable income. We currently estimate that we will not be able
to utilize these international NOLs, therefore a valuation
allowance was established for them. Utilization of the NOL
carryforwards is subject to annual limitations due to certain
stock ownership changes. To the extent not utilized, the NOL
carryforwards will begin to expire during the years 2012 through
2024. Utilization of NOL carryforwards is dependent upon
generating sufficient taxable income in the appropriate
jurisdictions within the carryforward period. Estimates of
future taxable income can be significantly affected by changes
in natural gas and oil prices, estimates of the timing and
amount of future production and estimates of future operating
and capital costs.
76
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The rollforward of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the
year
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credited (charged) to provision
for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom NOL carryforwards
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Brazil and Other International NOL
carryforwards
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the year
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. deferred taxes have not been provided on foreign
income of $39 million that is permanently reinvested
internationally. We currently do not have any foreign tax
credits available to reduce U.S. taxes on this income if it
was repatriated.
|
|
11.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation:
|
On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) to
account for stock-based compensation. Among other things,
SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the use of APB 25 and
the intrinsic value method of accounting and requires companies
to recognize in their financial statements the cost of services
received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on
the grant date fair value of those awards. We elected to use the
modified prospective method for adoption, which requires
compensation expense to be recorded for all unvested stock
options and other equity-based compensation beginning in the
first quarter of adoption. For all unvested options outstanding
as of January 1, 2006, the previously measured but
unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at
the original grant date or modification date, has been or will
be recognized in our financial statements over the remaining
vesting period. For equity-based compensation awards granted or
modified subsequent to January 1, 2006, compensation
expense, based on the fair value on the date of grant, has been
or will be recognized in our financial statements over the
vesting period. We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to measure the fair value of stock options and a
lattice-based model for our performance and market-based
restricted shares. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), we followed the intrinsic value
method in accordance with APB 25 to account for stock-based
compensation. Prior period financial statements have not been
restated.
Historically, we have used and we anticipate continuing to use
unissued shares of stock when stock options are exercised. At
December 31, 2006, we had approximately 2.6 million
additional shares available for issuance pursuant to our
existing employee and director plans. Of the shares available at
December 31, 2006, only 1.2 million could be granted
as restricted shares. Grants of restricted shares under our 2004
Omnibus Stock Plan reduce the total number of shares available
under that plan by two times the number of restricted shares
issued.
The modified prospective method requires us to estimate
forfeitures in calculating the expense related to stock-based
compensation as opposed to our prior policy of recognizing the
forfeitures as they occurred. We recorded a cumulative effect
gain on a change in accounting principle of $1 million as a
result of the adoption of this standard. Because the amount was
immaterial, we included it in general and administrative expense
on our consolidated statement of income.
The modified prospective method precludes changes to the grant
date fair value of equity awards granted before the required
effective date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Any
unearned compensation recorded under APB 25 related to
these awards is eliminated against the appropriate equity
accounts. As a result, upon adoption we eliminated
$34 million of unearned compensation cost and reduced by a
like amount additional paid-in capital on our consolidated
balance sheet.
77
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $32 million (pre-tax)
for all plans. Of that amount, $11 million was capitalized
in oil and gas properties. Our net income was reduced by
$5 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted share, as a
result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).
SFAS No. 123(R) also requires that tax benefits
relating to stock-based compensation deductions in excess of the
deferred tax assets recorded at the time of grant be
prospectively presented in our statement of cash flows as a
source of financing cash flows. Accordingly, for the year ended
December 31, 2006, we reported $5 million of excess
tax benefits from stock-based compensation as cash provided by
financing activities on our statement of cash flows.
As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately
$60 million of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to unvested stock-based compensation plans. This
compensation expense is expected to be recognized on a
straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period of
approximately 5 years.
Stock Options. We have granted stock
options under several plans. Options generally expire ten years
from the date of grant and become exercisable at the rate of
20% per year. The exercise price of options cannot be less
than the fair market value per share of our common stock on the
date of grant.
The fair value of the stock options granted prior to and
remaining outstanding at January 1, 2006 was determined
using the Black-Scholes option valuation method assuming no
dividends, a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 4.09%,
an expected life of 6.5 years and a weighted average
volatility of 37.52%.
The following table provides information related to stock option
activity for the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Average Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
23.60
|
|
|
$
|
10.66
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
20.91
|
|
|
|
9.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
12.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
23.68
|
|
|
|
10.71
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
|
$
|
8.83
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the
current market value of the underlying stock at the indicated
date, grant date, exercise date or forfeiture date, as
applicable, exceeds the exercise price of the option. |
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during
2005 was approximately $49 million.
78
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
$ 7.97 to $10.00
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
1.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
8.14
|
|
10.01 to 12.50
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
1.2 years
|
|
|
|
11.78
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
11.78
|
|
12.51 to 15.00
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
3.1 years
|
|
|
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
14.71
|
|
15.01 to 17.50
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
5.5 years
|
|
|
|
16.63
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
16.63
|
|
17.51 to 22.50
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
5.3 years
|
|
|
|
18.96
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
18.96
|
|
22.51 to 27.50
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
7.2 years
|
|
|
|
24.73
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
24.65
|
|
27.51 to 35.00
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
8.0 years
|
|
|
|
31.13
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
30.84
|
|
35.01 to 41.72
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
8.0 years
|
|
|
|
37.91
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
38.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,571
|
|
|
|
6.3 years
|
|
|
$
|
23.68
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued upon the exercise of non-qualified stock
options during 2004 and 2005 resulted in a tax deduction for us
equivalent to the compensation income recognized by the option
holder and is recognized as a credit to additional paid in
capital rather than as a reduction of income tax expense. For
2006, only the excess tax benefit is recognized as a credit to
additional paid in capital and is calculated as the amount by
which the tax deduction we receive exceeds the deferred tax
asset associated with recorded stock compensation expense. The
amounts credited to additional paid in capital for 2006, 2005
and 2004 were approximately $5 million, $17 million
and $6 million, respectively.
Restricted Shares. At December 31,
2006, our employees held 0.6 million restricted shares that
primarily vest equally over the service period of five years.
The vesting of these shares is dependant upon the employees
continued service with our company.
In addition, at December 31, 2006, our employees held
1.5 million restricted shares subject to performance-based
vesting criteria (substantially all of which are considered
market-based restricted shares under SFAS No. 123(R)).
In February 2006, 974,000 of these restricted performance-based
shares were granted. The number of these shares that vest is
based upon established performance targets that will be assessed
on March 1, 2009. The grant date fair value of these shares
was $23.20 per share for a total value of $23 million.
The expense will be recognized ratably over the service period
from February 2006 to March 2009. Under the grants to our
executive officers, they are permitted to retire on or after
March 1, 2008, if certain other conditions are met, without
forfeiting the shares granted. To the extent that our executive
officers qualify for retirement based on this provision, the
expense will be recognized ratably over the service period from
February 2006 to the applicable retirement eligibility date.
Substantially all of the remaining performance based shares may
vest in whole or in part in 2008, 2009 or 2010. The percentage
of the shares vesting, if any, in a year is subject to the
achievement of the targets identified in the respective
restricted share agreements.
Under our non-employee director restricted stock plan as in
effect on December 31, 2006, immediately after each annual
meeting of our stockholders, each of our non-employee directors
then in office received a number of restricted shares determined
by dividing $75,000 by the fair market value of one share of our
common stock on the date of the annual meeting. In addition, new
directors elected after an annual meeting receive a number of
restricted shares determined by dividing $75,000 by the fair
market value of one share of our common stock on the date of
their election. The forfeiture restrictions lapse on the day
before the first
79
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
annual meeting of stockholders following the date of issuance of
the shares if the holder remains a director until that time. At
December 31, 2006, 109,913 shares remained available
for grants under this plan.
The following table provides information related to restricted
share activity for the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service-Based
|
|
|
Market-Based
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Vested
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares outstanding at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair
value per share of shares granted during the period
|
|
$
|
43.50
|
|
|
$
|
23.20
|
|
|
$
|
27.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of shares vested
during the period
|
|
$
|
3,759
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
3,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Pursuant
to our employee stock purchase plan, for each six month period
beginning on January 1 or July 1 during the term of the
plan, each eligible employee has the opportunity to purchase our
common stock for a purchase price equal to 85% of the lesser of
the fair market value of our common stock on the first day of
the period or the last day of the period. No employee may
purchase common stock under the plan valued at more than $25,000
in any calendar year. Employees of our foreign subsidiaries are
not eligible to participate in the plan.
During 2006, options to purchase 51,445 shares of our
common stock at a weighted average fair value of $13.35 per
share were issued under the plan. The fair value of the options
granted in 2006 was determined using the Black-Scholes option
valuation method assuming no dividends, a risk-free
weighted-average interest rate of 4.83%, an expected life of
6 months and weighted-average volatility of 40.04%. At
December 31, 2006, 658,614 shares of our common stock
remained available for issuance pursuant to the plan.
U.K. Bonus Plan. We have a cash bonus
plan for the employees of our U.K. North Sea operations. The
value of the bonus is determined based on the value of the
shares of our U.K. subsidiary as determined by our Board of
Directors. This plan is accounted for as a liability plan under
SFAS No. 123(R) and is not material to our financial
statements.
80
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pro forma Disclosures. Prior to
January 1, 2006, we accounted for our employee stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by
APB 25. As required by SFAS No. 123(R), we have
disclosed below the effect on net income and earnings per share
that would have been recorded using the fair value based method
for the years 2005 and 2004. The weighted average fair value of
the options granted during 2005 was determined using the
Black-Scholes option valuation method assuming no dividends, a
weighted average risk-free interest rate of 3.76%, an expected
life of 6.5 years and weighted average volatility of
38.13%. The weighted average fair value of the options granted
during 2004 was determined using the Black-Scholes option
valuation method assuming no dividends, a weighted average
risk-free interest rate of 3.25%, an expected life of
6.5 years and weighted average volatility of 40.94%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported(1)
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
Pro
forma(2)
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
Basic earnings per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.68
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
Diluted earnings per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation costs, net of related tax
effects, of $7 million and $3 million for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation costs, net of related tax
effects, that would have been included in the determination of
net income had the fair value based method been applied of
$16 million and $10 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
|
|
12.
|
Pension
Plan Obligation:
|
As a result of our acquisition of EEX in November 2002, we
assumed responsibility for a defined pension benefit plan for
current and former employees of EEX and its subsidiaries. The
plan was amended, effective March 31, 2003, to cease all
future retirement benefit accruals. After March 31, 2003,
no participant has earned any further benefit accruals under the
plan participant benefits were frozen as of
March 31, 2003 and the benefits will not increase based
upon future service completed or compensation received after
that date. Accrued pension costs are funded based upon
applicable requirements of federal law and deductibility for
federal income tax purposes.
In September 2006, SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans was issued. SFAS No. 158 requires, among
other things, the recognition of the funded status of each
defined pension benefit plan, retiree health care and other
post-retirement benefit plans and post-employment benefit plans
on the balance sheet. Each overfunded plan is recognized as an
asset and each underfunded plan is recognized as a liability.
The initial impact of adoption of the standard due to
unrecognized prior service costs or credits and net actuarial
gains or losses as well as subsequent changes in the funded
status is recognized as a component of accumulated comprehensive
income in stockholders equity. Minimum pension liabilities
and related intangible assets also are derecognized upon
adoption. SFAS No. 158 requires initial application
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. We adopted
SFAS No. 158 as of
81
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2006 and recorded a charge of $2 million
(net of tax of $1 million) to accumulated other
comprehensive loss with a corresponding $3 million increase
in accrued pension liability.
The following tables summarize changes in the benefit
obligation, the plan assets and the funded status of our pension
plan as well as the components of net periodic benefit costs,
including key assumptions. The measurement dates for plan assets
and obligations were December 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Change in benefit
obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end
of year
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum liability
recognition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
(ABO)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded ABO
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension liability
(before minimum liability recognition)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional liability
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of funded
status:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded status
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension liability
(before minimum liability recognition)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition adjustment required to
recognize minimum liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension liability
(after minimum liability recognition)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check on reconciliation of
accrued pension
cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension liability at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Change in accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension liability at end
of year
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Net periodic benefit
cost:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Assumptions for Expense
Purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate assumption
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Assumptions for
Disclosure
Purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate assumption
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
In developing the overall expected long-term rate of return on
assets, we used a building block approach in which rates of
return in excess of inflation were considered separately for
equity securities, debt securities and all other assets. The
excess returns were weighted by the representative target
allocation and added along with an approximate rate of inflation
to develop the overall expected long-term rate of return.
We have developed an investment policy to invest in a broad
range of securities. The diversified portfolio aims to maximize
investment return without exposure to risk levels above those
determined by us. The investment policy takes into consideration
the retirement plans benefit obligations including the
expected timing of benefit payments.
The following table sets forth the allocation of the plans
assets by category at December 31, 2006 and 2005 as well as
the target allocation of assets for 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Plan Asset
Categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
40-60
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
40-60
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0-10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated future benefit payments under the plan for the
next ten years are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1
|
|
2012 2016
|
|
|
9
|
|
During 2007, we anticipate making a contribution of
approximately $1 million to the plan.
83
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans:
|
Post-Retirement
Medical Plan
We sponsor a post-retirement medical plan that covers all
retired employees until they reach 65. At December 31,
2006, our accumulated benefit obligation was $4 million and
our accrued benefit cost was $3 million. Our net periodic
benefit cost has been approximately $1 million per year.
The expected future benefit payments under our post-retirement
medical plan for the next ten years are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2007 2011
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Next 5 years
|
|
|
2
|
|
Incentive
Compensation Plan
Effective January 1, 2003, our Board of Directors adopted
our 2003 incentive compensation plan. The plan provides for the
creation each calendar year of an award pool that is generally
equal to 5% of our adjusted net income (as defined in the plan)
plus the revenues attributable to overriding royalty interests
bearing on the interests of investors that participate in
certain of our activities. Adjusted net income for purposes of
this plan excludes unrealized gains and losses on commodity
derivatives. The plan is administered by the
Compensation & Management Development Committee of our
Board of Directors and award amounts are recommended by our
chief executive officer. All employees are eligible for awards
if employed on both October 1 and December 31 of the
performance period. Awards under the plan may, and generally do,
have both a current and a deferred component. Deferred awards
are paid in four annual installments, each installment
consisting of 25% of the deferred award, plus interest. Total
expense under the plan for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 was $39 million, $42 million and
$29 million, respectively.
401(k)
and Deferred Compensation Plans
We sponsor a 401(k) profit sharing plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan
covers all of our employees other than employees of our foreign
subsidiaries. We match $1.00 for each $1.00 of employee
deferral, with our contribution not to exceed 8% of an
employees salary, subject to limitations imposed by the
Internal Revenue Service. During 1997, we implemented a highly
compensated employee deferred compensation plan. This
non-qualified plan allows an eligible employee to defer a
portion of his or her salary or bonus on an annual basis. We
match $1.00 for each $1.00 of employee deferral, with our
contribution not to exceed 8% of an employees salary,
subject to limitations imposed by the plan. Our contribution
with respect to each participant in the deferred compensation
plan is reduced by the amount of contribution made by us to our
401(k) plan for that participant. Our combined contributions to
these two plans totaled $4 million, $3 million and
$2 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies:
|
Lease
Commitments
We have various commitments under non-cancellable operating
lease agreements for office space, equipment and drilling rigs.
The majority of these commitments are related to multi-year
contracts for drilling
84
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
rigs. Future minimum payments required under our operating
leases as of December 31, 2006 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
2008
|
|
|
65
|
|
2009
|
|
|
22
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense with respect to our lease commitments for office
space for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
was $4 million, $5 million and $4 million,
respectively.
Other
Commitments
As is common in the oil and gas industry, we have various
contractual commitments pertaining to exploration, development
and production activities. We have work related commitments for,
among other things, drilling wells, obtaining and processing
seismic data and fulfilling other cash commitments. At
December 31, 2006, these work related commitments total
$257 million and are comprised of $160 million in the
United States and $97 million internationally.
Litigation
We have been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits
arising in the ordinary course of our business. While the
outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, we
do not expect these matters to have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
|
|
15.
|
Stockholder
Rights Plan:
|
In 1999, we adopted a stockholder rights plan. The plan is
designed to ensure that all of our stockholders receive fair and
equal treatment if a takeover of our company is proposed. It
includes safeguards against partial or two-tiered tender offers,
squeeze-out mergers and other abusive takeover tactics.
The plan provides for the issuance of one right for each
outstanding share of our common stock. The rights will become
exercisable only if a person or group acquires 20% or more of
our outstanding voting stock or announces a tender or exchange
offer that would result in ownership of 20% or more of our
voting stock.
Each right will entitle the holder to buy one one-thousandth
(1/1000) of a share of a new series of junior participating
preferred stock at an exercise price of $85 per right,
subject to antidilution adjustments. Each one one-thousandth of
a share of this new preferred stock has the dividend and voting
rights of, and is designed to be substantially equivalent to,
one share of our common stock. Our Board of Directors may, at
its option, redeem all rights for $0.01 per right at any
time prior to the acquisition of 20% or more of our outstanding
voting stock by a person or group.
If a person or group acquires 20% or more of our outstanding
voting stock, each right will entitle holders, other than the
acquiring party or parties, to purchase shares of our common
stock having a market value of $170 for a purchase price of $85,
subject to antidilution adjustments.
The plan also includes an exchange option. If a person or group
acquires 20% or more, but less than 50%, of our outstanding
voting stock, our Board of Directors may, at its option,
exchange the rights in whole or part for shares of our common
stock. Under this option, we would issue one share of our common
stock, or
85
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
one one-thousandth of a share of new preferred stock, for each
two shares of our common stock for which a right is then
exercisable. This exchange would not apply to rights held by the
person or group holding 20% or more of our voting stock.
If, after the rights have become exercisable, we merge or
otherwise combine with another entity, or sell assets
constituting more than 50% of our assets or producing more than
50% of our earnings power or cash flow, each right then
outstanding will entitle its holder to purchase for $85, subject
to antidilution adjustments, a number of the acquiring
partys common shares having a market value of twice that
amount.
The plan will not prevent, nor is it intended to prevent, a
takeover of our company. Since the rights may be redeemed by our
Board of Directors under certain circumstances, they should not
interfere with any merger or other business combination approved
by our Board. The rights do not in any way diminish our
financial strength, affect reported earnings per share or
interfere with our business plans.
86
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
While we only have operations in the oil and gas exploration and
production industry, we are organizationally structured along
geographic operating segments. Our operating segments are the
United States, the United Kingdom, Malaysia, China and
Other International. The accounting policies of each of our
operating segments are the same as those described in
Note 1, Organization and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies.
The following tables provide the geographic operating segment
information required by SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information as well as results of operations of oil
and gas producing activities required by SFAS No. 69,
Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing
Activities as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Income tax allocations
have been determined based on statutory rates in the applicable
geographic segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
1,611
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Allocated income taxes
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from oil and gas
properties
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest
income, capitalized interest and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Commodity derivative income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
5,208
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
1,689
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Allocated income taxes
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from oil and gas
properties
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest
income, capitalized interest and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Commodity derivative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
4,226
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
1,311
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Production and other taxes
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Ceiling test writedown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Other
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Allocated income taxes
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from oil and gas
properties
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest
income, capitalized interest and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Commodity derivative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
3,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
1,743
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments, net of interest
capitalized of $44, $46 and $26 during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Income tax payments
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Non-cash items excluded from the
statement of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
Asset retirement costs
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
18.
|
Related
Party Transaction:
|
David A. Trice, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Susan G. Riggs, our Treasurer, are minority owners
of Huffco International L.L.C. In May 1997, prior to
Mr. Trice and Ms. Riggs joining us, we acquired from
Huffco an entity now known as Newfield China, LDC, the owner of
a 12% interest in a three field unit located on Blocks 04/36 and
05/36 in Bohai Bay, offshore China. Huffco retained preferred
shares of Newfield China that provide for an aggregate dividend
equal to 10% of the excess of proceeds received by Newfield
China from the sale of oil, gas and other minerals over all
costs incurred with respect to exploration and production in
Block 05/36, plus the cash purchase price we paid Huffco for
Newfield China ($6 million). At
89
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2006, Newfield China had approximately
$55 million of unrecovered exploration and production
costs. As a result, no dividends have been paid to date on its
preferred shares. Newfield anticipates that it will begin paying
preferred dividends in the third quarter of 2007. Based on our
estimate of the net present value of the proved reserves
associated with Block 05/36, the indirect interests (through
Huffco) in Newfield Chinas preferred shares held by
Mr. Trice and Ms. Riggs had a net present value of
approximately $274,000 and $105,000, respectively, at
December 31, 2006.
|
|
19.
|
Quarterly
Results of Operations (Unaudited):
|
The results of operations by quarter for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
Income from
operations(1)
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Basic earnings per common
share(2)
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
Diluted earnings per common
share(2)
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
Income from
operations(3)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Basic earnings per common
share(2)
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
Diluted earnings per common
share(2)
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income from operations for the second quarter of 2006 includes
an early redemption premium of $19 million paid to holders
of our
83/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012 that were redeemed in May 2006 and
the write-off of the remaining unamortized original issuance
cost of these notes of $8 million. |
|
|
|
Income from operations in the third quarter of 2006 includes a
$34 million credit to lease operating expense resulting
from the difference between the proceeds received in the third
quarter of 2006 from the settlement of all of our insurance
claims related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and our actual
hurricane related expenses incurred to date. |
|
|
|
Income from operations in the fourth quarter of 2006 includes
$50 million of hurricane related repair expenses incurred
subsequent to the settlement of all of our insurance claims
related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and a $15 million
charge related to a valuation allowance on U.K. net operating
loss carryforwards. |
|
(2) |
|
The sum of the individual quarterly earnings per share may not
agree with
year-to-date
earnings per share as each quarterly computation is based on the
income or loss for that quarter and the weighted average number
of shares outstanding during that quarter. |
|
(3) |
|
Income from operations for the third quarter of 2005 includes an
unrealized loss on discontinued cash flow hedges of
$65 million as a result of production deferrals experienced
in the Gulf of Mexico related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Income from operations for the fourth quarter of 2005 includes a
full cost ceiling test writedown of $10 million related to
certain of our nonproducing international operations and the
recognition of a $22 million benefit related to our
business interruption insurance coverage. |
90
NEWFIELD
EXPLORATION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY
OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES UNAUDITED
Costs incurred for oil and gas property acquisitions,
exploration and development for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Exploration(1)
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
Development(2)
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs
incurred(3)
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Exploration(1)
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
Development(2)
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs
incurred(3)
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
acquisitions:(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
Exploration(1)
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
Development(2)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs
incurred(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
1,743
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $359 million, $254 million and
$136 million of United States costs for non-exploitation
activities for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively;
$7 million, $26 million and $25 million of United
Kingdom costs for non-exploitation activities for 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively; $22 million, $17 million and
$9 million of Malaysia costs for non-exploitation
activities for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively;
$1 million, $1 million and $1 million of China
costs for non-exploitation activities for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively; and $1 million, $2 million and
$4 million of Other International costs for
non-exploitation activities for 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $16 million, $44 million and $48 million
for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, of asset retirement costs
recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143. |
|
(3) |
|
Totals for each year exclude the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property sales proceeds
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Ceiling test writedown
international
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Insurance settlement
proceeds domestic
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes $344 million and $375 million recorded as
unproved and proved property acquisition costs, respectively,
related to the August 2004 acquisition of Inland Resources.
These amounts represent the recorded fair value of the oil and
gas assets. The cash consideration paid in the acquisition was
approximately $575 million. |
91
NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES
UNAUDITED (Continued)
Capitalized costs for our oil and gas producing activities
consisted of the following at the end of each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Kingdom
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
$
|
7,554
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,937
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,410
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
Accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(3,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
5,208
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
$
|
6,015
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,157
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,839
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7,042
|
|
Accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(2,613
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,632
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
4,226
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,080
|
|
Unproved properties
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
Accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(2,125
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
3,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES
UNAUDITED (Continued)
Users of this information should be aware that the process of
estimating quantities of proved and proved
developed natural gas and crude oil reserves is very
complex, requiring significant subjective decisions in the
evaluation of all available geological, engineering and economic
data for each reservoir. The data for a given reservoir also may
change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors,
including additional development activity, evolving production
history and continual reassessment of the viability of
production under varying economic conditions. Consequently,
material revisions to existing reserve estimates occur from time
to time.
Estimated Net Quantities of Proved Oil and Gas
Reserves
The following table sets forth our total net proved reserves and
our total net proved developed reserves as of December 31,
2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the changes in our total net
proved reserves during the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006, as estimated by our petroleum
engineering staff:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, Condensate and Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids (MMBbls)
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Proved developed and
undeveloped reserves as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
1,087.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1,090.2
|
|
|
|
1,314.2
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316.8
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and other
additions
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
230.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.9
|
|
|
|
262.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262.4
|
|
Purchases of
properties(1)
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
131.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.4
|
|
|
|
418.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457.8
|
|
Sales of properties
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
Production
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(197.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(198.2
|
)
|
|
|
(237.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
84.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
1,239.6
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1,241.1
|
|
|
|
1,748.1
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,783.9
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and other
additions
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
249.3
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
|
|
313.4
|
|
|
|
304.5
|
|
|
|
69.2
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
433.2
|
|
Purchases of properties
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
Sales of properties
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Production
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
(183.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(183.4
|
)
|
|
|
(233.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
86.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
|
|
|
1,327.2
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
|
|
1,391.3
|
|
|
|
1,846.2
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
2,000.9
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(85.5
|
)
|
|
|
(57.0
|
)
|
|
|
(16.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(75.7
|
)
|
Extensions, discoveries and other
additions
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
466.2
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
480.6
|
|
|
|
537.6
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601.8
|
|
Purchases of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Sales of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
Production
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(189.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189.6
|
)
|
|
|
(236.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(243.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
114.3
|
|
|
|
1,535.0
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
1,586.2
|
|
|
|
2,091.8
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
2,272.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves as
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
955.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
958.3
|
|
|
|
1,139.9
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142.5
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
1,003.9
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1,005.3
|
|
|
|
1,302.2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337.9
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
1,010.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010.2
|
|
|
|
1,338.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363.8
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
1,093.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093.6
|
|
|
|
1,458.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
1,484.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Substantially all of the purchases of U.S. oil, condensate
and natural gas liquids relates to our August 2004 acquisition
of Inland Resources. |
All of our oil reserves in Malaysia and China are associated
with production sharing contracts and are calculated using the
economic interest method.
93
NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES
UNAUDITED (Continued)
Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved
Oil and Gas Reserves
The following information was developed utilizing procedures
prescribed by SFAS No. 69, Disclosures about Oil
and Gas Producing Activities. The information is based on
estimates prepared by our petroleum engineering staff. The
standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows should not be viewed as representative of our
current value. It and the other information contained in the
following tables may be useful for certain comparative purposes,
but should not be solely relied upon in evaluating us or our
performance.
We believe that in reviewing the information that follows the
following factors should be taken into account:
|
|
|
|
|
future costs and sales prices will probably differ from those
required to be used in these calculations;
|
|
|
|
actual rates of production achieved in future years may vary
significantly from the rates of production assumed in the
calculations;
|
|
|
|
a 10% discount rate may not be reasonable as a measure of the
relative risk inherent in realizing future net oil and gas
revenues; and
|
|
|
|
future net revenues may be subject to different rates of income
taxation.
|
Under the standardized measure, future cash inflows were
estimated by applying year-end oil and gas prices applicable to
our reserves to the estimated future production of year-end
proved reserves. Future cash inflows do not reflect the impact
of future production that is subject to open hedge positions
(see Note 5, Commodity Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities). Future cash inflows were reduced by
estimated future development, abandonment and production costs
based on year-end costs in order to arrive at net cash flows
before tax. Future income tax expense has been computed by
applying year-end statutory tax rates to aggregate future
pre-tax net cash flows reduced by the tax basis of the
properties involved and tax carryforwards. Use of a 10% discount
rate and year-end prices and costs are required by
SFAS No. 69.
In general, management does not rely on the following
information in making investment and operating decisions. Such
decisions are based upon a wide range of factors, including
estimates of probable as well as proved reserves and varying
price and cost assumptions considered more representative of a
range of possible outcomes.
94
NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES
UNAUDITED (Continued)
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
from our estimated proved oil and gas reserves is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
12,922
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
14,375
|
|
Less related future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(3,652
|
)
|
Development and abandonment costs
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before
income taxes
|
|
|
8,222
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
8,861
|
|
Future income tax expense
|
|
|
(2,309
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before 10%
discount
|
|
|
5,913
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
6,283
|
|
10% annual discount for estimating
timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(2,727
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(2,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
3,186
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
15,458
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
16,952
|
|
Less related future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
(2,688
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(3,142
|
)
|
Development and abandonment costs
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(1,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before
income taxes
|
|
|
11,578
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
Future income tax expense
|
|
|
(3,585
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(3,959
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before 10%
discount
|
|
|
7,993
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
8,439
|
|
10% annual discount for estimating
timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(3,259
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(3,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
4,734
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
10,718
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,944
|
|
Less related future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs
|
|
|
(2,067
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
Development and abandonment costs
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before
income taxes
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,849
|
|
Future income tax expense
|
|
|
(2,149
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows before 10%
discount
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,668
|
|
10% annual discount for estimating
timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,066
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
3,557
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURES
UNAUDITED (Continued)
Set forth in the table below is a summary of the changes in the
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows for our
proved oil and gas reserves during each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
4,734
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
5,053
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in prices and costs
|
|
|
(1,959
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(2,255
|
)
|
Changes in quantities
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
Changes in future development costs
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Development costs incurred during
the period
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Additions to proved reserves
resulting from extensions, discoveries and improved recovery,
less related costs
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
Purchases and sales of reserves in
place, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
Sales of oil and gas, net of
production costs
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
981
|
|
Production timing and other
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
|
|
|
(1,548
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(1,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
3,186
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
3,557
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in prices and costs
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
Changes in quantities
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
Changes in future development costs
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Development costs incurred during
the period
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Additions to proved reserves
resulting from extensions, discoveries and improved recovery,
less related costs
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
Purchases and sales of reserves in
place, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Sales of oil and gas, net of
production costs
|
|
|
(1,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,185
|
)
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
Production timing and other
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
4,734
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
2,932
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in prices and costs
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
Changes in quantities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Development costs incurred during
the period
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Additions to proved reserves
resulting from extensions, discoveries and improved recovery,
less related costs
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
Purchases and sales of reserves in
place, net
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
Sales of oil and gas, net of
production costs
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
Production timing and other
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
3,557
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of December 31, 2006 in ensuring that
material information was accumulated and communicated to
management, and made known to our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, on a timely basis to allow disclosure
as required in this report.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The information required to be furnished pursuant to this item
is set forth under the captions Managements Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm in Item 8 of this report.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of our internal control over financial reporting to
determine whether any changes occurred during the fourth quarter
of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. Based on that evaluation, there were no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting or in other
factors that have materially affected or are reasonably likely
to materially affect our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
97
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
The information required by Item 10 of
Form 10-K
is incorporated herein by reference to such information as set
forth in the proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on May 3, 2007 and to the
information set forth in Item 4A of this report.
Corporate
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a corporate code of business conduct and ethics
for directors, officers (including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and controller or principal
accounting officer) and employees. Our corporate code includes a
financial code of ethics applicable to our chief executive
officer, chief financial officer and controller or chief
accounting officer. Both of these codes are available on our
website at www.newfield.com. Stockholders may
request a free copy of these codes from:
Newfield Exploration Company
Attention: Investor Relations
363 North Sam Houston Parkway East, Suite 2020
Houston, Texas 77060
(281) 405-4284
Corporate
Governance Guidelines
We have adopted corporate governance guidelines, which are
available on our website. Stockholders may request a free copy
of our corporate governance guidelines from the address and
phone number set forth above under Corporate
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Committee
Charters
The charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation &
Management Development Committee and the Nominating &
Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors are
available on our website. Stockholders may request a free copy
of any of these charters from the address and phone number set
forth above under Corporate Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership
reporting compliance is incorporated herein by reference to such
information as set forth in the proxy statement for our 2007
annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 3, 2007.
Certifications
The New York Stock Exchange requires the chief executive officer
of each listed company to certify annually that he or she is not
aware of any violation by the company of the NYSE corporate
governance listing standards as of the date of the
certification, qualifying the certification to the extent
necessary. Our chief executive officer provided such
certification to the NYSE in 2006. In addition, the
certifications of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act have been filed as exhibits to this report
and to our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by Item 11 of
Form 10-K
is incorporated herein by reference to such information as set
forth in the proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting.
98
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by Item 12 of
Form 10-K
is incorporated herein by reference to such information as set
forth in the proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
The information required by Item 13 of
Form 10-K
is incorporated herein by reference to such information as set
forth in the proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by Item 14 of
Form 10-K
is incorporated herein by reference to such information as set
forth in the proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting.
99
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
Financial
Statements
Reference is made to the index set forth on page 48 of this
report.
Financial
Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules listed under SEC rules but not
included in this report are omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is provided in the notes
to our consolidated financial statements.
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Second Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Newfield (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
3
|
.1.1
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Second
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newfield dated
May 15, 1997 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1.1 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-32582))
|
|
3
|
.1.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Second
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newfield dated
May 12, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2.3 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 333-116191))
|
|
3
|
.1.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designation of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, setting forth the terms of the Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per
share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated Bylaws of Newfield (as
amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto adopted January 31,
2000 and Amendment No. 2 thereto adopted July 28,
2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 12, 1999, between Newfield and ChaseMellon
Shareholder Services L.L.C., as Rights Agent, specifying the
terms of the Rights to Purchase Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of Newfield (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to
Newfields Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed with the SEC on February 18, 1999 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated as of
October 15, 1997 among Newfield, as issuer, and Wachovia
Bank, National Association (formerly First Union National Bank),
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to
Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-39563))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Senior Indenture dated as of
February 28, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia Bank,
National Association (formerly First Union National Bank), as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2001 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Indenture dated as of
December 10, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia Bank,
National Association (formerly First Union National Bank), as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of
Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-71348))
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
4
|
.4.1
|
|
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture,
dated as of August 18, 2004, to Subordinated Indenture
dated as of December 10, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6.3 to Newfields Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-122157))
|
|
4
|
.4.2
|
|
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture,
dated as of April 3, 2006, to Subordinated Indenture dated
as of December 10, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4.3 of Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 1995
Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-92182))
|
|
10
|
.1.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1995 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Newfields Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.1.2
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1995 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 1998
Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1.1 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 333-59383))
|
|
10
|
.2.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment of 1998 Omnibus Stock
Plan, dated May 7, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1.2 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 333-59383))
|
|
10
|
.2.2
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1998 Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended on
May 7, 1998) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Newfields Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.2.3
|
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1998 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 2000
Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended and restated effective
February 14, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7.2 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 2000 Omnibus Plan (as amended and restated
effective February 14, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Newfields Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3.2
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended and
restated effective February 14, 2002) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3.3
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2003 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Elliott Pew, Terry W. Rathert, William D. Schneider,
Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer, James T.
Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark Blumenshine, Stephen
C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf and Mark J. Spicer dated as of
February 12, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3.2 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Newfield
Exploration Company 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on March 1, 2007
(File No. 1-12534))
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
10
|
.4.1
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2005 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Elliott Pew, Terry W. Rathert, William D. Schneider,
Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer, James T.
Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark Blumenshine, Stephen
C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf, Mark J. Spicer, Brian L. Rickmers
and Susan G. Riggs dated as of February 8, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 11, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4.2
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2006 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Elliott Pew, Terry W. Rathert, William D. Schneider,
Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer, James T.
Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark Blumenshine, Stephen
C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf, Mark J. Spicer, Brian L. Rickmers
and Susan G. Riggs dated as of February 14, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4.3
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2007 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Michael Van Horn, Terry W. Rathert, William D.
Schneider, Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, John H. Jasek, Gary
D. Packer and James T. Zernell dated as of February 14,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4.4
|
|
|
|
Form of 2007 Restricted Unit
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Michael Van Horn, Terry W. Rathert, William D.
Schneider, Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, John H. Jasek, Gary
D. Packer, James T. Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark
Blumenshine, Stephen C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf, Brian L.
Rickmers and Susan G. Riggs dated as of February 14, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 2000
Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Newfields Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
*10
|
.5.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 2000 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock
Plan
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Newfield Employee 1993 Incentive
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 33-69540))
|
|
10
|
.6.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Newfield Employee
1993 Incentive Compensation Plan (effective as of
February 14, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9.2 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Newfield
Exploration Company 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company
Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-32587))
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company
Change of Control Severance Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.9.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.10.1
|
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control
Severance Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice,
David F. Schaible, Elliot Pew and Terry W. Rathert dated
effective as of February 17, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Newfields Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
10
|
.10.2
|
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control
Severance Agreement between Newfield and each of Lee K. Boothby,
George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer and William D. Schneider dated
effective as of February 17, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Newfields Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.10.3
|
|
|
|
Form of First Amendment to Change
of Control Severance Agreement between Newfield and each
executive officer who is a party to such an agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between Newfield and each of its directors and executive
officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Newfields Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Resolution of Members Establishing
the Preferences, Limitations and Relative Rights of Series
A Preferred Shares of Huffco China, LDC dated
May 14, 1997 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-32587))
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 2, 2005, among Newfield Exploration Company, JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and a lender,
and the other agents and lenders party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 6, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
Identifies management contracts and compensatory plans or
arrangements. |
103
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on the 1st day of March, 2007.
NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
David A. Trice
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated and
on the 1st day of March, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
/s/ DAVID
A.
TRICE David
A. Trice
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ TERRY
W. RATHERT
Terry
W. Rathert
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ BRIAN
L.
RICKMERS Brian
L. Rickmers
|
|
Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ PHILIP
J. BURGUIERES
Philip
J. Burguieres
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAMELA
J. GARDNER
Pamela
J. Gardner
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ DENNIS
HENDRIX Dennis
Hendrix
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
R. KEMP III
John
R. Kemp III
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
MICHAEL LACEY
J.
Michael Lacey
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH
H. NETHERLAND
Joseph
H. Netherland
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ HOWARD
H.
NEWMAN Howard
H. Newman
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
G.
RICKS Thomas
G. Ricks
|
|
Director
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
/s/ JUANITA
F.
ROMANS Juanita
F. Romans
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID
F. SCHAIBLE
David
F. Schaible
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ C.
E. SHULTZ
C.
E. Shultz
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
TERRY STRANGE
J.
Terry Strange
|
|
Director
|
105
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Second Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Newfield (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
3
|
.1.1
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Second
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newfield dated
May 15, 1997 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1.1 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-32582))
|
|
3
|
.1.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Second
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newfield dated
May 12, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2.3 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 333-116191))
|
|
3
|
.1.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designation of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, setting forth the terms of the Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per
share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Restated Bylaws of Newfield (as
amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto adopted January 31,
2000 and Amendment No. 2 thereto adopted July 28,
2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of
February 12, 1999, between Newfield and ChaseMellon
Shareholder Services L.L.C., as Rights Agent, specifying the
terms of the Rights to Purchase Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of Newfield (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to
Newfields Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed with the SEC on February 18, 1999 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated as of
October 15, 1997 among Newfield, as issuer, and Wachovia
Bank, National Association (formerly First Union National Bank),
as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to
Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-39563))
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Senior Indenture dated as of
February 28, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia Bank,
National Association (formerly First Union National Bank), as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2001 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Indenture dated as of
December 10, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia Bank,
National Association (formerly First Union National Bank), as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of
Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-71348))
|
|
4
|
.4.1
|
|
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture,
dated as of August 18, 2004, to Subordinated Indenture
dated as of December 10, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6.3 to Newfields Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-122157))
|
|
4
|
.4.2
|
|
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture,
dated as of April 3, 2006, to Subordinated Indenture dated
as of December 10, 2001 between Newfield and Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4.3 of Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 3, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 1995
Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-92182))
|
|
10
|
.1.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1995 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Newfields Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.1.2
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1995 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 1998
Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1.1 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 333-59383))
|
|
10
|
.2.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment of 1998 Omnibus Stock
Plan, dated May 7, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1.2 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 333-59383))
|
|
10
|
.2.2
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1998 Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended on
May 7, 1998) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Newfields Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.2.3
|
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 1998 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 2000
Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended and restated effective
February 14, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7.2 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 2000 Omnibus Plan (as amended and restated
effective February 14, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Newfields Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3.2
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan (as amended and
restated effective February 14, 2002) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 5, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.3.3
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2003 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Elliott Pew, Terry W. Rathert, William D. Schneider,
Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer, James T.
Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark Blumenshine, Stephen
C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf and Mark J. Spicer dated as of
February 12, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3.2 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Newfield
Exploration Company 2004 Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on March 1, 2007
(File No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4.1
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2005 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Elliott Pew, Terry W. Rathert, William D. Schneider,
Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer, James T.
Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark Blumenshine, Stephen
C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf, Mark J. Spicer, Brian L. Rickmers
and Susan G. Riggs dated as of February 8, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 11, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4.2
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2006 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Elliott Pew, Terry W. Rathert, William D. Schneider,
Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer, James T.
Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William Mark Blumenshine, Stephen
C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf, Mark J. Spicer, Brian L. Rickmers
and Susan G. Riggs dated as of February 14, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.4.3
|
|
|
|
Form of TSR 2007 Restricted Stock
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Michael Van Horn, Terry W. Rathert, William D.
Schneider, Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, John H. Jasek,
Gary D. Packer and James T. Zernell dated as of
February 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
10
|
.4.4
|
|
|
|
Form of 2007 Restricted Unit
Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice, David F.
Schaible, Michael Van Horn, Terry W. Rathert, William D.
Schneider, Lee K. Boothby, George T. Dunn, John H. Jasek,
Gary D. Packer, James T. Zernell, Mona Leigh Bernhardt, William
Mark Blumenshine, Stephen C. Campbell, James J. Metcalf, Brian
L. Rickmers and Susan G. Riggs dated as of February 14,
2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company 2000
Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Newfields Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
*10
|
.5.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company 2000 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock
Plan
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Newfield Employee 1993 Incentive
Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 33-69540))
|
|
10
|
.6.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Newfield Employee
1993 Incentive Compensation Plan (effective as of
February 14, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9.2 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Newfield
Exploration Company 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company
Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-32587))
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Newfield Exploration Company
Change of Control Severance Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.9.1
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Newfield
Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.10.1
|
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control
Severance Agreement between Newfield and each of David A. Trice,
David F. Schaible Elliot Pew and Terry W. Rathert dated
effective as of February 17, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Newfields Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.10.2
|
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control
Severance Agreement between Newfield and each of Lee K. Boothby,
George T. Dunn, Gary D. Packer and William D. Schneider dated
effective as of February 17, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Newfields Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2004 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.10.3
|
|
|
|
Form of First Amendment to Change
of Control Severance Agreement between Newfield and each
executive officer who is a party to such an agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Newfields Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on February 21, 2006 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between Newfield and each of its directors and executive
officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Newfields Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Resolution of Members Establishing
the Preferences, Limitations and Relative Rights of Series
A Preferred Shares of Huffco China, LDC dated
May 14, 1997 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to Newfields Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(Registration
No. 333-32587))
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 2, 2005, among Newfield Exploration Company, JP
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and a lender,
and the other agents and lenders party thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Newfields Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 6, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to
Newfields Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 1, 2005 (File
No. 1-12534))
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
*32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer of Newfield Exploration Company pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
Identifies management contracts and compensatory plans or
arrangements. |