Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunites Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-22269
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrants Telephone Number)
March 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
March 31, 2012
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
|
|
|
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities
Trust (EOT)
Annual Report
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits
or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository
institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including
possible loss of principal invested.
Annual Report March 31, 2012
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion of Fund Performance |
|
|
2 |
|
Performance |
|
|
3 |
|
Fund Profile |
|
|
3 |
|
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures |
|
|
4 |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
5 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
19 |
|
Federal Tax Information |
|
|
20 |
|
Notice to Shareholders |
|
|
21 |
|
Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
|
22 |
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
23 |
|
Management and Organization |
|
|
25 |
|
Important Notices |
|
|
27 |
|
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Managements Discussion of Fund Performance1
Economic and Market Conditions
In the second quarter of 2011, Europes sovereign debt problems intensified, causing investors to
worry about the potential impact on the U.S. economy and U.S. banks. Unemployment remained high,
the housing market was stagnant, and Congressional wrangling over the debt ceiling led to a
downgrade of U.S. Treasuries. Reacting to this turmoil, the S&P 500 Index2 fell more
than 15% during late July and early August of 2011 and spent the next several months clawing its
way back.
Beginning in mid-December 2011, an equity market rally took hold and continued through the end of
the fiscal year, fueled by stronger economic growth in the fourth quarter, falling unemployment
claims, an uptick in hiring, and what the markets perceived as a successful restructuring of Greek
debt. The S&P 500 Index finished the period with an 8.54%
gain.
Against this backdrop, bond
investors became increasingly risk-averse during the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2011. Treasury prices
rose, driving yields down significantly from April through September of 2011. By October, Treasury
rates settled into a relatively stable trading range that lasted through the end of the period on
March 31, 2012.
Early in the period, municipal bonds rallied along with Treasuries, but not to the same degree. As
the period wore on, however, several factors caused the performance of municipals to improve
compared to Treasuries. The massive municipal defaults predicted by high-profile market analysts
did not materialize, while the fiscal situation for many issuers began to recover. As investors
appeared more comfortable taking on risk, lower-rated municipals outperformed higher-rated issues
and longer-maturity bonds outperformed those with shorter maturities.
With falling Treasury yields driven by a worldwide flight to quality (the perceived safety of
Treasuries and other high-rated issues) and the Federal Reserves Operation Twist (central banks
swapping of its short-term holdings for long-term Treasury bonds), municipal bonds during the
period offered significantly higher taxable-equivalent yields than Treasuries. The ratio of 30-year
AAA6 municipal yields to 30-year Treasury yieldswhich historically has averaged less
than 100% because municipal yields are federally tax-exempt began the period at 106.2% and
finished at 101.5%. For the one-year period as a whole, the Funds primary benchmark,
the Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index (the Index)an unmanaged index of municipal
bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or
morerose 19.97%.
Fund
Performance
For the
fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Fund)
shares at net asset value (NAV) had a total return of 18.67%, underperforming the 19.97% return of
the Index.
Generally speaking, the Funds overall strategy is to invest primarily in bonds at the longer end
of the maturity spectrum in order to capture their typically higher yields and greater tax exempt
income payments. The Fund partially hedges against the greater risk of volatility at the long end
of the curve, using Treasury futures to provide a degree of downside protection. While the Funds
investments are primarily investment-grade (rated BBB and higher), as an opportunities fund it may
invest across the credit quality spectrum. And while the Index includes only bonds with maturities
of 22 years or more, the Fund may diversify across the yield curve and hold some securities with
shorter maturities.
For the 12-month period, the Funds underperformance to the Index resulted in part from the
underperformance of holdings in the 520 year maturity range, which underperformed longer maturity
bonds for the period. While holdings in the 520 year maturity range were positive contributors to
performance, longer maturity bonds had greater total return. Another detractor was the Funds
holding in one particular airline backed bond, which declined in value when the carrier declared
bankruptcy during the fiscal year.
Hedging interest rate volatility through the use of Treasury futures, a risk management strategy,
is intended to moderate performance on both the upside and the downside.
So in a period when municipal and Treasury bonds saw strong performance, the Funds hedge also
mitigated a portion of the Funds positive performanceand, as intended, reduced Fund volatility
during a year of rather pronounced market volatility.
In contrast, the Funds strategy of favoring
longer-maturity, longer-duration bonds was a positive contributor to performance, as municipal
bonds with 2030 year maturities outperformed the broader municipal market. Overweighting zero
coupon bonds, which performed strongly as rates declined, also helped results, as did an
overweighting in lower-rated bonds such as hospital credits.
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by
determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all
distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due
to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply
and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value
will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due
to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For
performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
2
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Portfolio Managers Cynthia J. Clemson and Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since |
% Average Annual Total Returns |
|
Inception Date |
|
One Year |
|
Inception |
|
Fund at NAV |
|
|
5/29/2009 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
% |
|
|
11.19 |
% |
Fund at Market Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.98 |
|
|
|
11.48 |
|
Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index |
|
|
5/29/2009 |
|
|
|
19.97 |
% |
|
|
9.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% Premium/Discount to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distributions per share for the period |
|
$ |
1.163 |
|
Distribution Rate at NAV |
|
|
5.18 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV |
|
|
7.97 |
% |
Distribution Rate at Market Price |
|
|
5.14 |
% |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price |
|
|
7.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
% Total Leverage5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residual Interest Bond (RIB)
|
|
|
11.83 |
% |
Credit Quality (% of total investments)6
The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established
in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, the Funds credit
quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA |
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
BB |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
AA |
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
3.4 |
|
A |
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
CCC |
|
|
1.2 |
|
BBB |
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
Not Rated |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by
determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all
distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due
to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply
and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value
will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due
to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For
performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures
|
|
|
1 |
|
The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio manager(s) and are
current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to
change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance and the Fund(s)
disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as
investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be
relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This
commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as forward
looking statements. The Funds actual future results may differ significantly from those
stated in any forward looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or
financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund
shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and
other risks discussed from time to time in the Funds filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. |
|
2 |
|
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of large-cap stocks commonly used as a measure of
U.S. stock market performance. Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index is an
unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more.
Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales
charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest
directly in an index. |
|
3 |
|
Performance results reflect the effects of leverage. |
|
4 |
|
The Distribution Rate is based on the Funds last regular distribution per share in
the period (annualized) divided by the Funds NAV or market price at the end of the period.
The Funds distributions may be composed of ordinary income, tax-exempt income, net realized
capital gains and return of capital. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest
combined federal and state income tax rates, where applicable. Lower tax rates would result in
lower tax-equivalent performance. Actual tax rates will vary depending on your income,
exemptions and deductions. Rates do not include local taxes. Subsequent distributions
declared, but not reflected in the Fund Profile, reflect a reduction of the monthly
distribution. |
|
5 |
|
Fund employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an
opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the
likelihood of greater price volatility). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in
short-term interest rates. See Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities
Held in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB
leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of period end as a
percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
|
6 |
|
Ratings are based on Moodys, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based
largely on the rating agencys investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating
assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuers current
financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily
reflect its assessment of the volatility of a securitys market value or of the liquidity of
an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the
higher rating is applied. |
|
|
|
Fund profile subject to change due to active management. |
4
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Investments 111.9%
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cogeneration 1.0%
|
|
Maryland Energy Financing Administration, (AES Warrior
Run), (AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,509,450
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Colver),
(AMT), 5.125%, 12/1/15
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,652,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,161,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education 10.2%
|
|
Maine Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Bowdoin College),
5.00%, 7/1/39(1)
|
|
$
|
10,440
|
|
|
$
|
11,251,084
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority,
(Dartmouth College),
5.25%, 6/1/39(1)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
13,503,000
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School),
5.75%, 7/1/33
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,691,400
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (The New School),
5.75%, 7/1/50
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,340,080
|
|
|
|
Oregon Facilities Authority, (Lewis & Clark College),
5.625%, 10/1/36
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
1,235,798
|
|
|
|
University of Virginia, 5.00%, 6/1/40
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
2,890,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,912,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
Utilities 11.3%
|
|
Apache County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson
Electric Power Co.), 4.50%, 3/1/30
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
341,476
|
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric),
5.875%, 1/1/34
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
|
4,169,176
|
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric),
5.875%, 2/15/34
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
3,215,405
|
|
|
|
Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric
Co.), 6.50%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
5,105,139
|
|
|
|
Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (Central
Power and Light Co.), 6.30%, 11/1/29
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
6,816,480
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Public Power District, 5.00%, 1/1/31
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,246,840
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Public Power District, 5.00%, 1/1/32
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,119,910
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Public Power District, 5.00%, 1/1/34
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,224,120
|
|
|
|
Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson
Electric Power Co.), 5.25%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,591,025
|
|
|
|
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District,
AZ,
5.00%, 1/1/38(1)
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
9,719,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,548,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Obligations 3.6%
|
|
California, 6.00%, 4/1/38
|
|
$
|
5,750
|
|
|
$
|
6,587,947
|
|
|
|
Frisco, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed),
5.00%, 8/15/30
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,884,900
|
|
|
|
Will County, IL, Community Unit School District
No. 365-U,
(Valley View), 5.75%, 11/1/32
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
2,525,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,998,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care
Miscellaneous 2.6%
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Community Hospital Group, Inc.), 5.75%, 10/1/31
|
|
$
|
7,435
|
|
|
$
|
8,485,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,485,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital 19.1%
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/34
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,863
|
|
|
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,139,270
|
|
|
|
Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.,
(Texas Childrens Hospital),
5.50%, 10/1/39(1)
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
|
|
13,666,653
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Provena Healthcare),
7.75%, 8/15/34
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,700,320
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center),
6.625%, 11/1/39
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,713,540
|
|
|
|
Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities
Board, (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6.00%, 7/1/38
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
1,815,683
|
|
|
|
Kansas Development Finance Authority, (Adventist Health System),
5.75%, 11/15/38
|
|
|
5,915
|
|
|
|
6,732,867
|
|
|
|
Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic
Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
3,795,862
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Jordan Hospital), 6.75%, 10/1/33
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
3,792,907
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Lowell General Hospital), 4.75%, 7/1/25
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,449,899
|
|
|
|
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System),
5.25%, 11/15/46
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
4,193,036
|
|
|
|
New York Dormitory Authority, (NYU Hospital Center),
5.625%, 7/1/37
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,070,610
|
|
|
|
South Lake County, FL, Hospital District, (South Lake Hospital),
6.25%, 4/1/39
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1,460,195
|
|
|
|
St. Paul, MN, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (HealthEast),
6.00%, 11/15/35
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,784,875
|
|
|
|
Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational and Facilities Board,
(Wellmont Health System), 5.25%, 9/1/36
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
3,206,353
|
|
|
|
Tyler, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (East Texas
Medical Center), 5.375%, 11/1/37
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
4,561,470
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wheaton
Franciscan Healthcare System), 5.125%, 8/15/30
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,013,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,222,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
5
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Portfolio
of Investments continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housing 4.0%
|
|
Maryland Community Development Administration, Department of
Housing and Community Development, (AMT),
5.15%, 9/1/42(1)
|
|
$
|
11,205
|
|
|
$
|
11,442,434
|
|
|
|
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, Single Family Housing,
(FHLMC), (FNMA), (GNMA), 5.90%, 9/1/36
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,961,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,403,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development
Revenue 15.9%
|
|
Alabama Industrial Development Authority, (Pine City Fiber Co.),
(AMT), 6.45%, 12/1/23
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,556,000
|
|
|
|
Brazos River, TX, Harbor Navigation District, (Dow Chemical
Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,213,150
|
|
|
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority,
(Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.125%, 11/1/23
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,329,550
|
|
|
|
Campbell County, WY, (Basin Electric Power Cooperative),
5.75%, 7/15/39
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,352,110
|
|
|
|
Clayton County, GA, Development Authority, (Delta Airlines,
Inc.), 8.75%, 6/1/29
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
3,986,489
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority,
(International Paper Co.), (AMT), 6.10%, 8/1/24
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
2,778,572
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast, TX, Waste Disposal Authority, (Valero Energy
Corp.), (AMT), 6.65%, 4/1/32
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,001,180
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX, Airport System, (Continental Airlines), (AMT),
6.75%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,517,360
|
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, (Navistar International Corp.),
6.50%, 10/15/40
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
1,634,230
|
|
|
|
Indiana Financing Authority, (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.),
6.00%, 8/1/39
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
9,152,880
|
|
|
|
Nevada Department of Business and Industry, (Republic Services,
Inc.), (AMT), 5.625% to 6/1/18 (Put Date), 12/1/26
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
2,031,030
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental
Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,007,680
|
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.),
5.25%, 10/1/35(2)
|
|
|
3,070
|
|
|
|
3,343,199
|
|
|
|
Owen County, KY,
(Kentucky-American
Water Co., Inc.), 6.25%, 6/1/39
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,302,040
|
|
|
|
Richland County, SC, (International Paper Co.), (AMT),
6.10%, 4/1/23
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
395,432
|
|
|
|
Sabine River Authority, LA, (International Paper Co.),
6.20%, 2/1/25
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
206,564
|
|
|
|
Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board, (International Paper
Co.), 5.80%, 5/1/34
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
906,959
|
|
|
|
St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.),
5.125%, 6/1/37
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
977,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,691,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Industrial
Development Revenue 0.5%
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New
Jersey-American
Water Co., Inc.), (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.375%, 5/1/32
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
1,701,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,701,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 0.3%
|
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., NY, (NPFG),
4.50%, 2/15/47
|
|
$
|
865
|
|
|
$
|
846,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
846,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Other
Revenue 0.5%
|
|
New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Queens Baseball
Stadium), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/36
|
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
|
$
|
1,719,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,719,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured Special Tax
Revenue 4.0%
|
|
Hesperia, CA, Community Redevelopment Agency, (XLCA),
5.00%, 9/1/25
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
177,071
|
|
|
|
Hesperia, CA, Public Financing Authority, (Redevelopment and
Housing Projects), (XLCA), 5.00%, 9/1/37
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
223,943
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities,
(AGC), 6.875%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/34
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
3,120,320
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities,
(AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
4,605,060
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC),
0.00%, 8/1/54
|
|
|
64,765
|
|
|
|
5,111,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,237,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured
Transportation 7.5%
|
|
Clark County, NV, (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport),
(AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/39
|
|
$
|
2,885
|
|
|
$
|
3,110,203
|
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/30
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,370,960
|
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/32
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
150,195
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System),
(AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/35
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,319,560
|
|
|
|
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System),
(AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/36
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
4,691,100
|
|
|
|
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (NPFG),
0.00%, 1/15/32
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
2,672,300
|
|
|
|
San Jose, CA, Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT),
6.00%, 3/1/47
|
|
|
7,850
|
|
|
|
8,407,742
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/34
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
1,177,389
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
6
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Portfolio
of Investments continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insured
Transportation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/35
|
|
$
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
430,945
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/37
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
1,042,383
|
|
|
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System),
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/42
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
540,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,912,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Revenue / Certificates of
Participation 0.7%
|
|
Mohave County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mohave
Prison LLC), 8.00%, 5/1/25
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,237,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,237,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue 3.7%
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.00%, 7/15/30
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
557,318
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.25%, 7/15/40
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
634,513
|
|
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center),
6.375%, 7/15/43
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
348,633
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA,
5.30%, (0.00% until 12/1/12), 6/1/37
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
3,124,922
|
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.75%, 6/1/47
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
3,603,139
|
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., (7 World Trade Center),
5.00%, 9/15/40(3)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,093,930
|
|
|
|
Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue,
5.00%, 12/1/37
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
1,988,560
|
|
|
|
Seminole Tribe, FL,
5.50%, 10/1/24(4)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
958,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,309,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life
Care 4.2%
|
|
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations, CA,
(Episcopal Senior Communities), 6.00%, 7/1/31
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
|
$
|
1,383,448
|
|
|
|
Bexar County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (Army
Retirement Residence Foundation), 6.20%, 7/1/45
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,164,000
|
|
|
|
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority No. 2, (Immanuel
Obligated Group), 5.50%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
508,961
|
|
|
|
Douglas County, NE, Hospital Authority No. 2, (Immanuel
Obligated Group), 5.625%, 1/1/40
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
993,339
|
|
|
|
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, (Shell Point
Village/Alliance Community), 5.00%, 11/15/29
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
1,564,372
|
|
|
|
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, (Shell Point
Village/Alliance Community), 6.125%, 11/15/26
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
523,075
|
|
|
|
Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, (Shell Point
Village/Alliance Community), 6.50%, 11/15/31
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
1,675,584
|
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Charlestown Community, Inc.), 6.125%, 1/1/30
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
528,877
|
|
|
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(King Farm Presbyterian Community), 5.00%, 1/1/17
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
146,826
|
|
|
|
Mount Vernon, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Wartburg
Senior Housing, Inc.), 6.20%, 6/1/29
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
984,350
|
|
|
|
Tempe, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Friendship Village
of Tempe), 6.00%, 12/1/32
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
257,769
|
|
|
|
Tempe, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Friendship Village
of Tempe), 6.25%, 12/1/42
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
749,068
|
|
|
|
Washington Housing Finance Commission, (Wesley Homes),
6.20%, 1/1/36
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,555,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,035,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Tax
Revenue 4.0%
|
|
Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29
|
|
$
|
1,625
|
|
|
$
|
1,701,034
|
|
|
|
Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
3,173,386
|
|
|
|
Heritage Harbor South Community Development District, FL,
(Capital Improvements), 6.50%, 5/1/34
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
3,176,096
|
|
|
|
Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/31
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
755,757
|
|
|
|
Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/32
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
726,752
|
|
|
|
Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/33
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
773,623
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
974,312
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
1,855,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,136,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Loan 1.8%
|
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, 6.00%, 1/1/28
|
|
$
|
5,160
|
|
|
$
|
5,803,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,803,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation 10.4%
|
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, Toll Bridge Revenue, (San Francisco
Bay Area), 5.00%, 4/1/34
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
1,478,404
|
|
|
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/31
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
354,591
|
|
|
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, 6.00%, 1/1/41
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38,284
|
|
|
|
Memphis-Shelby County, TN, Airport Authority, (AMT),
5.75%, 7/1/24
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
397,142
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, 5.00%, 11/15/31
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,864,000
|
|
|
|
Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport),
5.00%, 10/1/41
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
1,449,456
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority,
(Transportation System), 0.00%, 12/15/38
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
7,089,300
|
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., (One World Trade Center),
5.00%, 12/15/41
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
3,116,419
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
7
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Portfolio
of Investments continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/38
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,366,950
|
|
|
|
Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority,
5.00%, 7/1/35
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
805,778
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, MO, (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport),
6.625%, 7/1/34
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,739,150
|
|
|
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (LBJ
Express Managed Lanes Project), 7.00%, 6/30/34
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
3,048,308
|
|
|
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North
Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project), 6.875%, 12/31/39
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,736,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,484,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water and
Sewer 6.6%
|
|
Atlanta, GA, Water & Wastewater Revenue,
6.25%, 11/1/34
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,493,260
|
|
|
|
Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/34
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
592,394
|
|
|
|
Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/40
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,593,828
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California,
5.00%, 7/1/29
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,267,960
|
|
|
|
New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and
Sewer System),
5.25%, 6/15/40(1)
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
|
|
12,950,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,898,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt
Investments 111.9%
|
|
|
(identified cost $324,425,054)
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, Less
Liabilities (11.9)%
|
|
$
|
(39,513,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets 100.0%
|
|
$
|
331,234,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the
Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
|
|
|
AGC
|
|
- Assured Guaranty Corp.
|
AGM
|
|
- Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
|
AMBAC
|
|
- AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
|
AMT
|
|
- Interest earned from these securities may be considered a
tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative
Minimum Tax.
|
BHAC
|
|
- Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
|
FGIC
|
|
- Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
|
FHLMC
|
|
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
|
FNMA
|
|
- Federal National Mortgage Association
|
GNMA
|
|
- Government National Mortgage Association
|
NPFG
|
|
- National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
|
PSF
|
|
- Permanent School Fund
|
XLCA
|
|
- XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
|
At March 31, 2012, the concentration of the Trusts
investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of
total investments, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
14.7%
|
|
California
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
Others, representing less than 10% individually
|
|
|
72.8%
|
|
The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by
municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt
securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic
developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to
reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at
March 31, 2012, 11.4% of total investments are backed by
bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial
guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by
an individual financial institution ranged from 0.1% to 5.0% of
total investments.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that
issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H). |
|
(2) |
|
Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover
payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(3) |
|
When-issued security. |
|
(4) |
|
Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A
under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold
in certain transactions (normally to qualified institutional
buyers) and remain exempt from registration. At March 31,
2012, the aggregate value of these securities is $958,244 or
0.3% of the Trusts net assets. |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
8
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $324,425,054)
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
35,964
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash*
|
|
|
625,000
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
5,404,261
|
|
|
|
Receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
58,937
|
|
|
|
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures
contracts
|
|
|
214,453
|
|
|
|
Receivable from the transfer agent
|
|
|
81,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
377,167,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued
|
|
$
|
44,430,000
|
|
|
|
Payable for investments purchased
|
|
|
38,770
|
|
|
|
Payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
1,094,240
|
|
|
|
Payable to affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment adviser and administration fee
|
|
|
191,226
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
93,188
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
86,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
45,933,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
331,234,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets
|
|
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares
authorized
|
|
$
|
153,093
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
291,838,121
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss
|
|
|
(7,706,114
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
92,824
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
46,856,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
331,234,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,309,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
Net assets
¸
common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
$
|
21.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents restricted cash on deposit at the broker for open
financial futures contracts. |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
9
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
20,825,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
20,825,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Investment adviser and administration fee
|
|
$
|
2,164,659
|
|
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
13,407
|
|
|
|
Custodian fee
|
|
|
149,456
|
|
|
|
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees
|
|
|
16,758
|
|
|
|
Legal and accounting services
|
|
|
56,506
|
|
|
|
Printing and postage
|
|
|
39,475
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and fees
|
|
|
349,058
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
83,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
2,872,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of custodian fee
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense reductions
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
$
|
2,872,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
17,952,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment transactions
|
|
$
|
1,321,468
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
(8,890,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
$
|
(7,569,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
42,226,752
|
|
|
|
Financial futures contracts
|
|
|
614,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
$
|
42,841,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
|
|
$
|
35,272,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
53,224,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
10
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
in Net Assets
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
From operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
17,952,726
|
|
|
$
|
19,462,831
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss from investment transactions and financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
(7,569,344
|
)
|
|
|
(1,052,830
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments and financial futures contracts
|
|
|
42,841,402
|
|
|
|
(26,734,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
53,224,784
|
|
|
$
|
(8,324,747
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(17,796,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,952,894
|
)
|
|
|
From net realized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,913,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders
|
|
$
|
(17,796,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,866,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions
|
|
$
|
310,220
|
|
|
$
|
357,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
$
|
310,220
|
|
|
$
|
357,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
$
|
35,738,929
|
|
|
$
|
(28,833,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
At beginning of period
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
$
|
324,328,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
331,234,023
|
|
|
$
|
295,495,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net
investment income
included in net assets
|
|
At end of period
|
|
$
|
92,824
|
|
|
$
|
396,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
11
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Operating Activities
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
53,224,784
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments purchased
|
|
|
(35,974,283
|
)
|
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
47,881,476
|
|
|
|
Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)
|
|
|
(2,846,376
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(625,000
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in interest receivable
|
|
|
172,111
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
(49,805
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in receivable for variation margin on open financial
futures contracts
|
|
|
(198,047
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in receivable from the transfer agent
|
|
|
(81,496
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in payable for investments purchased
|
|
|
38,770
|
|
|
|
Decrease in payable for when-issued securities
|
|
|
(59,541
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser and
administration fee
|
|
|
15,391
|
|
|
|
Decrease in interest expense and fees payable
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued expenses
|
|
|
(28,305
|
)
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from
investments
|
|
|
(42,226,752
|
)
|
|
|
Net realized gain from investments
|
|
|
(1,321,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
17,920,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
Distributions paid, net of reinvestments
|
|
$
|
(17,485,855
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in due to custodian
|
|
|
(398,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
$
|
(17,884,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
$
|
35,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
35,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information:
|
|
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions
|
|
$
|
310,220
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest and fees
|
|
|
350,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
12
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
March 31,
2010(1)
|
|
|
|
Net asset value Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19.320
|
|
|
$
|
21.230
|
|
|
$
|
19.100
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Operations
|
|
Net investment
income(3)
|
|
$
|
1.174
|
|
|
$
|
1.273
|
|
|
$
|
1.007
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
2.309
|
|
|
|
(1.818
|
)
|
|
|
2.164
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
3.483
|
|
|
$
|
(0.545
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Distributions
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
(1.163
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.240
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.930
|
)
|
|
|
From net realized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.125
|
)
|
|
|
(0.079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions
|
|
$
|
(1.163
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.365
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs charged to paid-in
capital(3)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value End of period
|
|
$
|
21.640
|
|
|
$
|
19.320
|
|
|
$
|
21.230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value End of period
|
|
$
|
21.800
|
|
|
$
|
18.630
|
|
|
$
|
20.260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Net Asset
Value(4)
|
|
|
18.67
|
%
|
|
|
(2.61
|
)%
|
|
|
16.96
|
%(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Return on Market
Value(4)
|
|
|
23.98
|
%
|
|
|
(1.60
|
)%
|
|
|
11.62
|
%(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|
Net assets, end of period (000s omitted)
|
|
$
|
331,234
|
|
|
$
|
295,495
|
|
|
$
|
324,328
|
|
|
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses excluding interest and
fees(7)
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Interest and fee
expense(9)
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Total
expenses(7)
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
|
|
5.84
|
%(8)
|
|
|
Portfolio Turnover
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the period from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to
March 31, 2010. |
(2) |
|
Net asset value at beginning of period reflects the deduction of
the sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder from
the $20.00 offering price. |
(3) |
|
Computed using average shares outstanding. |
(4) |
|
Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the
percentage change in net asset value or market value with all
distributions reinvested. |
(5) |
|
Not annualized. |
(6) |
|
Total investment return on net asset value is calculated
assuming a purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the
sales load of $0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the
first day and a sale at the net asset value on the last day of
the period reported with all distributions reinvested. Total
investment return on market value is calculated assuming a
purchase at the offering price of $20.00 less the sales load of
$0.90 per share paid by the shareholder on the first day and a
sale at the current market price on the last day of the period
reported with all distributions reinvested. |
(7) |
|
Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than
0.005%. |
(8) |
|
Annualized. |
(9) |
|
Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating
rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond
transactions (see Note 1H). |
See Notes to
Financial Statements.
13
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Notes
to Financial Statements
1 Significant
Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust)
is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a
diversified, closed-end management investment company. The
Trusts primary investment objective is to provide current
income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Trust will,
as a secondary investment objective, seek to achieve capital
appreciation.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of
the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment
Valuation Debt obligations (including
short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than
sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations
provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such
services pricing models. Inputs to the models may include,
but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and
asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of
securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or
information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and
economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach,
which considers information regarding securities with similar
characteristics to determine the valuation for a security.
Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of
sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which
approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are
valued at the closing settlement price established by the board
of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Investments for
which valuations or market quotations are not readily available
or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods
determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees
of the Trust in a manner that fairly reflects the
securitys value, or the amount that the Trust might
reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current
sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on
a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary
from one pricing context to another. These factors may include,
but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of
any contractual restrictions on the securitys disposition,
the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of
the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant
information obtained from broker/dealers or other market
participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts,
and/or the
appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an
analysis of the entitys financial condition, and an
evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the
market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and
Related Income Investment transactions for
financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date
basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are
determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is
recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for
amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal
Taxes The Trusts policy is to comply
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders
each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and
tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all
of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for
federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to
satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate
distributions from the interest income generated by its
investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from
regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as
exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any,
earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7,
1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At March 31, 2012, the Trust, for federal income tax
purposes, had current year deferred capital losses of $8,450,273
which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net
realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent
permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the
amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise
be necessary to relieve the Trust of any liability for federal
income or excise tax. The current year deferred capital losses
are treated as arising on the first day of the Funds next
taxable year.
As of March 31, 2012, the Trust had no uncertain tax
positions that would require financial statement recognition,
de-recognition, or disclosure. The Trust files a U.S. federal
income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is
subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a
period of three years from the date of filing.
D Expense
Reduction State Street Bank and
Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Trust.
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced
by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash
balance the Trust maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if
any, used to reduce the Trusts custodian fees are reported
as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
E Legal
Fees Legal fees and other related expenses
incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of
capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the
restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment
are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect
or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
F Use of
Estimates The preparation of the financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
G Indemnifications
Under the Trusts organizational documents, its officers
and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and
expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the
Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail,
shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the
Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the
obligations of the Trust. However, the Trusts Declaration
of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part
of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust
shall assume the defense on behalf of any Trust shareholders.
Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of
Trust property of any shareholder held personally liable solely
by
14
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or
expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal
course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with
service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The
Trusts maximum exposure under these arrangements is
unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made
against the Trust that have not yet occurred.
H Floating Rate
Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities
Held The Trust may invest in residual
interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate
securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate
bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Trust buys a
residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a
Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized
as a trust), set up by the broker. The broker deposits a bond
into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the
broker by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not
required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond).
The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes)
which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held
by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the
holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their
notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Bond
held by the SPV to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV.
Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the
broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and
exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond.
Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for
transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment
of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described
above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its
Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a
liability under the caption Payable for floating rate
notes issued in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset
weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes
to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date.
Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate
notes issued approximates its carrying value. Interest expense
related to the Trusts liability with respect to Floating
Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by
the Trust, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence
of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement,
such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying
Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the
underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes
that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the
market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the
liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided
for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At March 31,
2012, the amount of the Trusts Floating Rate Notes
outstanding and the related collateral were $44,430,000 and
$72,533,154, respectively. The range of interest rates on the
Floating Rate Notes outstanding at March 31, 2012 was 0.19%
to 0.35%. For the year ended March 31, 2012, the
Trusts average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the
average interest rate including fees were $44,430,000 and 0.79%,
respectively.
The Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements
with the broker by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the
broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the
liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the
liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any
shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls
as of March 31, 2012.
The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds from brokers
in a secondary market transaction without first owning the
underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be
treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any,
related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary
market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Trusts investment policies and restrictions expressly
permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds
typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields
available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and
maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for
fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate
environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate
bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and
income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile
than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trusts investment
policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as
permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the
Trusts restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior
securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply
to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a
liability in the Trusts Statement of Assets and
Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating
Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior
securities to which the Trusts restrictions apply.
Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt
from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of
1933.
I Financial Futures
Contracts Upon entering into a financial
futures contract, the Trust is required to deposit with the
broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a
certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin).
Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or
received by the Trust each business day, depending on the daily
fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are
recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Trust. Gains
(losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the
financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change
unexpectedly, the Trust may not achieve the anticipated benefits
of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.
Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are
exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is
substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty
performance.
J When-Issued Securities and
Delayed Delivery Transactions The Trust may
purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued
basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary
settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction
is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered
is fixed. The Trust maintains security positions for these
commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available
to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a
delayed delivery or when-issued basis are
marked-to-market
daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may
arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying
securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the
contract.
K Statement of Cash
Flows The cash amount shown in the Statement
of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the
Trusts Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents
the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any
short-term investments.
15
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
2 Distributions
to Shareholders
The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net
investment income to shareholders. In addition, at least
annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially
all of its net realized capital gains. Distributions are
recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Trust distinguishes
between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting
basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America require that only distributions in excess of
tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial
statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between
book and tax accounting relating to distributions are
reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions
from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary
income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended
March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
17,695,088
|
|
|
$
|
18,867,664
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income
|
|
$
|
100,987
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,833
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital gains
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended March 31, 2012, accumulated net
realized loss was decreased by $459,899 and accumulated
undistributed net investment income was decreased by $459,899
due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily
for accretion of market discount. These reclassifications had no
effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the
Trust.
As of March 31, 2012, the components of distributable
earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed tax-exempt income
|
|
$
|
92,824
|
|
|
|
Deferred capital losses
|
|
$
|
(8,450,273
|
)
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
47,600,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The differences between components of distributable earnings
(accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to
futures contracts, accretion of market discount and residual
interest bonds.
3 Investment
Adviser and Administration Fee and Other Transactions with
Affiliates
The investment adviser and administration fee is earned by EVM
as compensation for investment advisory and administrative
services rendered to the Trust. The fee is computed at an annual
rate of 0.60% of the Trusts average daily gross assets up
to $1.5 billion and 0.59% of average daily gross assets of
$1.5 billion or more, and is payable monthly. Average daily
gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness
for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the
Trust. Average daily gross assets are calculated by adding to
net assets the amount payable by the Trust to floating rate note
holders. For the year ended March 31, 2012, the investment
adviser and administration fee incurred by the Trust and the
effective annual rate, as a percentage of average daily gross
assets, were $2,164,659 and 0.60%, respectively.
Except for Trustees of the Trust who are not members of
EVMs organization, officers and Trustees receive
remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the
investment adviser and administration fee. Trustees of the Trust
who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to
defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in
accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation
Plan. For the year ended March 31, 2012, no significant
amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the
Trust are officers of EVM.
4 Purchases
and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term
obligations, aggregated $35,974,283 and $47,881,476,
respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2012.
5 Common
Shares of Beneficial Interest
Common shares issued pursuant to the Trusts dividend
reinvestment plan for the years ended March 31, 2012 and
March 31, 2011 were 14,816 and 16,822, respectively.
16
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
6 Federal
Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments of the Trust at March 31, 2012, as determined
on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cost
|
|
$
|
278,717,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
49,049,215
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(1,448,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
47,600,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Financial
Instruments
The Trust may trade in financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities.
These financial instruments may include financial futures
contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk
in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement
purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these
instruments represent the investment the Trust has in particular
classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily
represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The
measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is
meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are
considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at
March 31, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Month/Year
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Position
|
|
Aggregate Cost
|
|
Value
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
|
6/12
|
|
175
U.S. 10-Year
Treasury Note
|
|
Short
|
|
$
|
(22,809,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,659,766
|
)
|
|
$
|
150,070
|
|
|
|
6/12
|
|
125
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
|
|
Short
|
|
|
(17,602,319
|
)
|
|
|
(17,218,750
|
)
|
|
|
383,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
533,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2012, the Trust had sufficient cash
and/or
securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Trust is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course
of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Trust holds
fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if
interest rates rise. The Trust purchases and sells U.S. Treasury
futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The fair value of open derivative instruments (not considered to
be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and
whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at
March 31, 2012 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Asset Derivative
|
|
Liability Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
533,639
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
533,639
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation on futures
contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current
days variation margin on open futures contracts is
reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as
Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
17
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Notes
to Financial Statements continued
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be
hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the
Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk
exposure is interest rate risk for the year ended March 31,
2012 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Change in Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivatives Recognized
|
|
Appreciation (Depreciation) on
|
|
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
Derivatives Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
(8,890,812
|
)(1)
|
|
$
|
614,650
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain
(loss) Financial futures contracts. |
(2) |
|
Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) Financial futures
contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding
during the year ended March 31, 2012, which is indicative
of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately
$36,154,000.
8 Fair
Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value
measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the
assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation
techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of
inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical investments
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including a funds own assumptions in determining the fair
value of investments)
|
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level
disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities.
At March 31, 2012, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing
the Trusts investments and open derivative instruments,
which are carried at value, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Description
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
|
|
$
|
533,639
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
533,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
533,639
|
|
|
$
|
370,747,514
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
371,281,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trust held no investments or other financial instruments as
of March 31, 2011 whose fair value was determined using
Level 3 inputs. At March 31, 2012, the value of
investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2,
if any, during the year then ended was not significant.
18
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Trustees and
Shareholders of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities
Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and
liabilities of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities
Trust (the Trust), including the portfolio of
investments, as of March 31, 2012, and the related
statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended,
the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two
years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for
each of the two years in the period then ended and the period
from the start of business, May 29, 2009, to March 31,
2010. These financial statements and financial highlights are
the responsibility of the Trusts management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The
Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of
March 31, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and
brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we
performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance National
Municipal Opportunities Trust as of March 31, 2012, the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then
ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years
in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each
of the two years in the period then ended and the period from
the start of business, May 29, 2009, to March 31,
2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
May 15, 2012
19
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Federal
Tax Information (Unaudited)
The
Form 1099-DIV
you receive in January 2013 will show the tax status of all
distributions paid to your account in calendar 2012.
Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with
respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the
Trust. As required by the Internal Revenue Code
and/or
regulations, shareholders must be notified regarding
exempt-interest dividends.
Exempt-Interest Dividends. The Trust designates
99.43% of dividends from net investment income as an
exempt-interest dividend.
20
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
At the August 8, 2011 Board Meeting, the Trustees approved the
following defensive investing policy: During unusual
market conditions, the Trust may invest up to 100% of its assets
in cash or cash equivalents temporarily, which may be
inconsistent with its investment objective(s) and other
policies.
21
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Annual
Meeting of Shareholders
The Trust held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on
January 27, 2012. The following action was taken by the
shareholders:
Item 1: The election of Helen Frame Peters,
Lynn A. Stout and Ralph F. Verni as Class III Trustees of
the Trust for a three-year term expiring in 2015, Scott E. Eston
as Class I Trustee of the Trust for a one-year term
expiring in 2013 and Harriett Tee Taggart as Class II
Trustee of the Trust for a two-year term expiring in 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee for Trustee
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Elected by All Shareholders
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helen Frame Peters
|
|
|
14,793,915
|
|
|
|
227,710
|
|
|
|
Lynn A. Stout
|
|
|
14,790,884
|
|
|
|
230,741
|
|
|
|
Ralph F. Verni
|
|
|
14,785,081
|
|
|
|
236,544
|
|
|
|
Scott E. Eston
|
|
|
14,767,002
|
|
|
|
254,623
|
|
|
|
Harriett Tee Taggart
|
|
|
14,751,479
|
|
|
|
270,146
|
|
|
|
22
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
The Trust offers a dividend reinvestment plan (Plan) pursuant to
which shareholders automatically have distributions reinvested
in common shares (Shares) of the Trust unless they elect
otherwise through their investment dealer. On the distribution
payment date, if the NAV per Share is equal to or less than the
market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions,
then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be
determined by the greater of the NAV per Share or 95% of the
market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on
the open market by American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, the Plan agent (Agent). Distributions
subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not Shares
are reinvested.
If your Shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or
other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in
the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan,
you will need to request that the Funds transfer agent
re-register your Shares in your name or you will not be able to
participate.
The Agents service fee for handling distributions will be
paid by the Trust. Plan participants will be charged their pro
rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.
Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by
writing to the Agent at the address noted on the following page.
If you withdraw, you will receive Shares in your name for all
Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant
elects by written notice to the Agent to sell part or all of his
or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Agent is authorized to
deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
If you wish to participate in the Plan and your Shares are held
in your own name, you may complete the form on the following
page and deliver it to the Agent. Any inquiries regarding the
Plan can be directed to the Agent at 1-866-439-6787.
23
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Application
for Participation in Dividend Reinvestment Plan
This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in
their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a
brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your
nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your
behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your
brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on
your behalf, you should request that your common shares be
re-registered in your own name which will enable your
participation in the Plan.
The following authorization and appointment is given with the
understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating
my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and
conditions of the Plan.
Please print exact name on account
Shareholder
signature Date
Shareholder
signature Date
Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All
persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.
YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE
YOUR DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.
This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the
following address:
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
c/o American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company
P.O. Box 922
Wall Street Station
New York, NY 10269-0560
Number of
Employees
The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,
as a closed-end, management investment company and has no
employees.
Number of
Shareholders
As of March 31, 2012, our records indicate that there are 8
registered shareholders and approximately 8,243 shareholders
owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers,
banks, and financial intermediaries.
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust
reports directly, which contain important information about the
Trust, please write or call:
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-262-1122
New York Stock
Exchange Symbol
The New York Stock Exchange symbol is EOT.
24
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Management
and Organization
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance
National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust) are
responsible for the overall management and supervision of the
Trusts affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are
listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the
office shown or other offices in the same company for the last
five years. The Noninterested Trustees consist of
those Trustees who are not interested persons of the
Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business
address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, EVC
refers to Eaton Vance Corp., EV refers to Eaton
Vance, Inc., EVM refers to Eaton Vance Management,
BMR refers to Boston Management and Research and
EVD refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and
EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM
and BMR. EVD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer
affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton
Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with
EVM listed below. Each Trustee oversees 180 portfolios in the
Eaton Vance Complex (including all master and feeder funds in a
master feeder structure). Each officer serves as an officer of
certain other Eaton Vance funds. Each Trustee serves for a three
year term. Each officer serves until his or her successor is
elected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Term of Office;
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
|
Trust
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience
|
|
|
|
Interested Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
1958
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director
and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of
EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee
and/or
officer of 180 registered investment companies. Mr. Faust
is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR,
EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust.
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
Director of EVC.
|
|
Noninterested
Trustees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott E. Eston
1956
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013.
1 year.
Trustee since 2011.
|
|
Private investor. Formerly held various positions at Grantham,
Mayo, Van Otterloo and Co., L.L.C. (investment management firm)
(1997-2009),
including Chief Operating Officer
(2002-2009),
Chief Financial Officer
(1997-2009)
and Chairman of the Executive Committee
(2002-2008);
President and Principal Executive Officer, GMO Trust (open-end
registered investment company)
(2006-2009).
Former Partner, Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P. (now
PricewaterhouseCoopers) (public accounting firm)
(1987-1997).
Directorships in the Last Five Years. None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin C. Esty
1963
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration
and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of
Business Administration.
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen R. Freedman
1940
|
|
Class I Trustee
|
|
Until 2013.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Private Investor. Former Chairman
(2002-2004)
and a Director
(1983-2004)
of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of
software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring
Ward International (fund distributor)
(2005-2007).
Former Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc.
(provider of enterprise management software to the power
generating industry)
(2005-2007).
Former Chief Executive Officer of Assurant, Inc. (insurance
provider)
(1979-2000).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
Director of Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of
cemeteries). Formerly, Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance
provider)
(1979-2011).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Park
1947
|
|
Class II Trustee
|
|
Until 2014.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Financial
Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (investment management firm)
(2010-2011).
Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp.
(specialty finance company)
(2006-2010).
Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital
Management, LLC (investment management firm)
(2002-2005).
Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
United Asset Management Corporation (investment management firm)
(1982-2001).
Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now
PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public
accounting firm)
(1972-1981).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald A. Pearlman
1940
|
|
Class II Trustee
|
|
Until 2014.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary
(Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury
(1983-1985).
Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S.
Congress
(1988-1990).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
25
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Management
and Organization continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Term of Office;
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
|
Trust
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience
|
|
|
Noninterested
Trustees (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helen Frame Peters
1948
|
|
Class III Trustee
|
|
Until 2015.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston
College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston
College
(2000-2002).
Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper
Investments (investment management firm)
(1998-1999).
Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income,
Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm)
(1991-1998).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
Formerly, Director of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale
club retailer)
(2004-2011).
Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR
Series Trust (exchange traded funds)
(2000-2009).
Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank
for banks)
(2007-2009).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynn A. Stout
1957
|
|
Class III Trustee
|
|
Until 2015.
3 years.
Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Distinguished Professor of Corporate and Business Law, Jack C.
Clarke Business Law Institute, Cornell University Law School.
Formerly, the Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and
Securities Law (2006-2012) and Professor of Law
(2001-2006),
University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harriett Tee Taggart
1948
|
|
Class II Trustee
|
|
Until 2014.
2 years.
Trustee since 2011.
|
|
Managing Director, Taggart Associates (a professional practice
firm). Formerly, Partner and Senior Vice President, Wellington
Management Company, LLP (investment management firm)
(1983-2006).
Directorships in the Last Five Years. Director of
Albemarle Corporation (chemicals manufacturer) (since
2007) and The Hanover Group (specialty property and
casualty insurance company) (since 2009). Formerly, Director of
Lubrizol Corporation (specialty chemicals)
(2007-2011).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph F. Verni
1943
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Class III Trustee
|
|
Until 2015.
3 Years.
Chairman of the
Board and Trustee since 2009.
|
|
Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment
Officer
(1982-1992),
Chief Financial Officer
(1988-1990)
and Director
(1982-1992),
New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual
Funds
(1982-1992).
Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street
Management & Research
(1992-2000).
Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds
(1992-2000).
Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC
(1998-2004)
and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp.
(2002-2006).
Directorships in the Last Five
Years.(1)
None.
|
|
Principal Officers
who are not Trustees
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Length of
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
Name and Year of Birth
|
|
Trust
|
|
Service
|
|
During Past Five Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson
1963
|
|
President
|
|
Since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payson F. Swaffield
1956
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Since 2011
|
|
Chief Income Investment Officer of EVC. Vice President of EVM
and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara E. Campbell
1957
|
|
Treasurer
|
|
Since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maureen A. Gemma
1960
|
|
Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
|
|
Vice President since 2011 and Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul M. ONeil
1953
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Since 2009
|
|
Vice President of EVM and BMR.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During their respective tenures, the Trustees (except
Mr. Eston and Ms. Taggart) also served as trustees of
one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated
in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund
(launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured
Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and
terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income
Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009). |
26
Eaton Vance
National
Municipal Opportunities Trust
March 31, 2012
Privacy. The
Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial
privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has
in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with
respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
|
|
|
Only such information received from you, through application
forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund
transactions will be collected. This may include information
such as name, address, social security number, tax status,
account balances and transactions.
|
|
|
None of such information about you (or former customers) will be
disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes
disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In
the normal course of servicing a customers account, Eaton
Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that
perform various required services such as transfer agents,
custodians and broker/dealers.
|
|
|
Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and
procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect
the confidentiality of such information.
|
|
|
We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time
upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review
our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the
link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.
|
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within
the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds,
Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton
Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton
Vance Managements Real Estate Investment Group and Boston
Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies
only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who
have a direct relationship with us. If a customers account
(i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party
financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such
advisors privacy policies apply to the customer. This
notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For
more information about Eaton Vances Privacy Policy, please
call
1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder
Documents. The Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of
shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements
and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple
accounts at the same residential or post office box address.
This practice is often called householding and it
helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton
Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of
your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or
your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that
your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact
Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122,
or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that
householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents
will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance
or your financial advisor.
Portfolio
Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its
underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of
portfolio holdings on
Form N-Q
with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal
year. The
Form N-Q
will be available on the Eaton Vance website at
www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122
or in the EDGAR database on the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q
may also be reviewed and copied at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, D.C. (call
1-800-732-0330
for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy
Voting. From time to time, funds are required to
vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The
Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable)
vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures
approved by the Funds and Portfolios Boards. You may
obtain a description of these policies and procedures and
information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12-month
period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by
calling
1-800-262-1122
and by accessing the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Additional Notice to
Shareholders. A Fund may purchase shares of its
common stock in the open market when they trade at a discount to
net asset value or at other times if the Fund determines such
purchases are advisable. There can be no assurance that a Fund
will take such action or that such purchases would reduce the
discount.
Closed-End Fund
Information. The Eaton Vance closed-end funds
make certain quarterly fund performance data and information
about portfolio characteristics (such as top holdings and asset
allocation) available on the Eaton Vance website after the end
of each calendar quarter-end. Certain month end fund performance
data for the funds, including total returns, are posted to the
website shortly after the end of each calendar month. Portfolio
holdings for the most recent calendar quarter-end are also
posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of
the quarter. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com
on the fund information pages under Individual
Investors Closed-End Funds.
27
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment
Adviser and Administrator
Eaton
Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Custodian
State
Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer
Agent
American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Fund
Offices
Two
International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide
a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling
1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrants Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit
committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is a consultant and
private investor. Previously, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an
investment management firm), as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty
finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC
(investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United
Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager
at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting
firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a) (d)
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the registrants
fiscal years ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 by the registrants principal accountant,
Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T), for professional services rendered for the audit of the registrants
annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
3/31/11 |
|
|
3/31/12 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
42,220 |
|
|
$ |
42,620 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(1) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Tax Fees(2) |
|
$ |
11,272 |
|
|
$ |
11,100 |
|
All Other Fees(3) |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,992 |
|
|
$ |
54,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements
and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) |
|
Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by
the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically
include fees for tax return preparation. |
|
(3) |
|
All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services
provided by the registrants principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax
services. |
(e)(1) The registrants audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the
pre-approval of services provided by the registrants principal accountant (the Pre-Approval
Policies). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee
in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the
Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services
determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures
governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit
and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval
Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must
be reviewed and ratified by the registrants audit committee at least annually. The registrants
audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of
the work of the registrants principal accountant.
(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrants audit
committee pursuant to the de minimis exception set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation
S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related,
tax, and other services) billed to the registrant by D&T for the registrants fiscal years ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for
audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the same
time periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
3/31/2011 |
|
|
3/31/2012 |
|
Registrant |
|
$ |
11,772 |
|
|
$ |
11,400 |
|
Eaton Vance(1) |
|
$ |
253,107 |
|
|
$ |
356,561 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The investment adviser to the registrant, as well as any of its affiliates that
provide ongoing services to the registrant, are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. |
(h) The registrants audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrants
principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrants investment adviser and any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services
to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is
compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. William H. Park
(Chair), Scott E. Eston, Helen Frame Peters, Lynn A. Stout and Ralph F. Verni are the members of
the registrants audit committee.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of
this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the Fund
Policy), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Funds
investment adviser and adopted the investment advisers proxy voting policies and procedures (the
Policies) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Funds proxy voting records
from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the
event that a conflict of interest arises between the Funds shareholders and the investment
adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment
adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such
conflict until it consults with the Boards Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund
Policy. The Boards Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate
course of action.
The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a companys management to its shareholders
and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy
voting service (Agent), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to
assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and
recordkeeping and disclosure
services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent. The Agent is
required to vote all proxies and/or refer them back to the investment adviser pursuant to the
Policies. It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the
recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to
mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers
contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover
measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible
transactions, except in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment
adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment
adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated
with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the
economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable
or insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of
interest between the Funds shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of
their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and
prospective corporate clients. The investment advisers personnel responsible for reviewing and
voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from
a company included on that list to the personnel of the investment adviser identified in the
Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner
inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel
will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material
conflict of interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the
investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling
1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commissions website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Cynthia J. Clemson and Thomas M. Metzold are responsible for the overall and day-to-day management
of the Trusts investments. Ms. Clemson and Mr. Metzold have been Eaton Vance portfolio managers
since 1991 and are each co-Directors of Municipal Investments and Vice Presidents of Eaton Vance
Management (EVM) and Boston Management and Research (BMR), an Eaton Vance subsidiary. This
information is provided as of the date of filing of this report.
The following table shows, as of the Funds most recent fiscal year end, the number of accounts the
portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets (in millions of
dollars) in the accounts managed within each category. The table also shows the number of accounts
with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the
total assets (in millions of dollars) in those accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
Number of Accounts |
|
|
Total Assets of |
|
|
|
of All |
|
|
of All |
|
|
Paying a |
|
|
Accounts Paying a |
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
Performance Fee |
|
|
Performance Fee |
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
2,241.4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Accounts |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Thomas M. Metzold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment
Companies |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
6,525.3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Other Accounts |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by the portfolio
manager as of the Funds most recent fiscal year end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity |
|
Portfolio Manager |
|
Securities Owned in the Fund |
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
None |
Thomas M. Metzold |
|
None |
Potential for Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in
connection with a portfolio managers management of the Funds investments on the one hand and
investments of other accounts for which a portfolio manager is responsible on the other. For
example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time,
resources and investment opportunities among the Fund and other accounts he or she advises. In
addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions between the Fund and the
other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs
from the action taken with respect to the Fund. In some cases, another account managed by a
portfolio manager may compensate the investment adviser based on the performance of the securities
held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts
of interest for a portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment
opportunities. Whenever conflicts of interest arise, a portfolio manager will endeavor to exercise
his or her discretion in a manner that he or she believes is equitable to all interested persons.
EVM has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts
including a code of ethics and policies which govern the investment advisers trading practices,
including among other things the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage
allocation, cross trades and best execution.
Compensation Structure for EVM
Compensation of EVMs portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary
components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus, and (3) annual stock-based compensation
consisting of options to purchase shares of EVCs nonvoting common stock and/or restricted shares
of EVCs nonvoting common stock. EVMs investment professionals also receive certain retirement,
insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to EVMs employees. Compensation of EVMs
investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based
compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect at or
shortly after the October 31st fiscal year end of EVC.
Method to Determine Compensation. EVM compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the
scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of
managed funds and accounts versus the benchmark(s) stated in the prospectus, as well as an
appropriate peer group (as described below). In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds
on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to relative risk-adjusted
performance. Risk-adjusted performance measures include, but are not limited to, the Sharpe Ratio.
Performance is normally based on periods ending on the September 30th preceding fiscal year end.
Fund performance is normally evaluated primarily versus peer groups of funds as determined by
Lipper Inc. and/or Morningstar, Inc. When a funds peer group as determined by Lipper or
Morningstar is deemed by EVMs management not to provide a fair comparison, performance may instead
be evaluated primarily against a custom peer group. In evaluating the performance of a fund and
its manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on three-year performance, with secondary
consideration of performance over longer and shorter periods. For funds that are tax-managed or
otherwise have an objective of after-tax returns, performance is measured net of taxes. For other
funds, performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis. For funds with an investment objective other
than total return (such as current income), consideration will also be given to the funds success
in achieving its objective. For managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment
performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis, based on averages or weighted averages among
managed funds and accounts. Funds and accounts that have performance-based advisory fees are not
accorded disproportionate weightings in measuring aggregate portfolio manager performance.
The compensation of portfolio managers with other job responsibilities (such as heading an
investment group or providing analytical support to other portfolios) will include consideration of
the scope of such responsibilities and the managers performance in meeting them.
EVM seeks to compensate portfolio managers commensurate with their responsibilities and
performance, and competitive with other firms within the investment management industry. EVM
participates in investment-industry compensation surveys and utilizes survey data as a factor in
determining salary, bonus and stock-based compensation levels for portfolio managers and other
investment professionals. Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by
the operating performance of EVM and its parent company. The overall annual cash bonus pool is
based on a substantially fixed percentage of pre-bonus operating income. While the salaries of
EVMs portfolio managers are comparatively fixed, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may
fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other
factors as described herein. For a high performing portfolio manager, cash bonuses and stock-based
compensation may represent a substantial portion of total compensation.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated
Purchasers
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrants principal executive officer and principal
financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrants current disclosure controls and
procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the
date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by
the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period
specified in the Commissions rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by
the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrants principal executive
officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting
during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
|
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
Registrants Code of Ethics. |
(a)(2)(i)
|
|
Treasurers Section 302 certification. |
(a)(2)(ii)
|
|
Presidents Section 302 certification. |
(b)
|
|
Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust
|
|
By: |
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
President |
|
|
Date: May 15, 2012
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act
of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Barbara E. Campbell
|
|
|
Barbara E. Campbell |
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
Date: May 15, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson
|
|
|
Cynthia J. Clemson |
|
|
President |
|
|
Date: May 15, 2012