e10vqza
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(AMENDMENT NO. 1)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
001-34258
(Commission file number)
|
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
98-0606750 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4-6 Rue Jean-Francois Bartholoni, 1204 Geneva, Switzerland
|
|
Not Applicable |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 41.22.816.1500
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
As of April 23, 2010, there were 740,659,690 shares of Weatherford registered shares, 1.16 Swiss
francs par value per share, outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Weatherford International Ltd. (the Company) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which was originally filed on May 3, 2010
(the Form 10-Q), to restate financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 due to errors in the Companys accounting for income taxes. The Companys management
identified a related material weakness with respect to its internal control over financial
reporting for income taxes. Disclosures related to these matters are included in Part I, Item 4,
under Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures, which describes the material weakness and
managements conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting for income taxes was
not effective as of March 31, 2010. In addition, further details on the adjustments are included
in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, under Note 2. Restatement of Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
For convenience of the reader, this Amendment No. 1 sets forth the Form 10-Q in its entirety,
as modified and superseded where necessary to reflect the restatement. The following items have
been amended principally as a result of, and to reflect, the restatement:
|
|
|
Part I Item 1. Financial Statements; |
|
|
|
Part I Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations; |
|
|
|
Part I Item 4. Controls and Procedures; |
|
|
|
Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors; and |
|
|
|
Part II Item 6. Exhibits |
This Amendment No. 1 amends only the portions of the Form 10-Q listed in the sections noted
above. The Risk Factors, Forward-Looking Statements and our Disputes, Litigation and
Contingencies financial statement footnote included within this document have been updated consistent with the disclosures
contained in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010,
originally filed March 8, 2011 and subsequently amended on March
11, 2011 and April
14, 2011. The remainder of the Form 10-Q is substantially unchanged, but is reproduced in this
Amendment No. 1 for convenience. With the exception of the updated Risk Factors,
Forward-Looking Statements and the Disputes, Litigation and
Contingencies financial statement footnote, this Amendment No. 1 does not reflect events occurring after the
original filing date of the Form 10-Q other than those associated with the restatement.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
|
$ |
252,519 |
|
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Uncollectible
Accounts of $21,847 and $20,466, Respectively |
|
|
2,654,568 |
|
|
|
2,510,948 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,315,337 |
|
|
|
2,238,294 |
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
258,790 |
|
|
|
259,077 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
665,541 |
|
|
|
721,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
6,101,335 |
|
|
|
5,981,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net of Accumulated
Depreciation of $3,604,422 and $3,440,448, Respectively |
|
|
6,881,544 |
|
|
|
6,989,379 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,141,362 |
|
|
|
4,156,105 |
|
Other Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization of
$380,164 and $359,052, Respectively |
|
|
754,828 |
|
|
|
772,786 |
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
533,248 |
|
|
|
533,138 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
313,459 |
|
|
|
263,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
18,725,776 |
|
|
$ |
18,696,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt |
|
$ |
991,440 |
|
|
$ |
869,581 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
1,121,175 |
|
|
|
1,002,359 |
|
Income Tax Payable |
|
|
171,586 |
|
|
|
201,647 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
|
|
836,647 |
|
|
|
927,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
3,120,848 |
|
|
|
3,000,700 |
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
5,844,610 |
|
|
|
5,847,258 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
372,873 |
|
|
|
410,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
9,338,331 |
|
|
|
9,258,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, CHF 1.16 Par Value, Authorized 1,093,303 Shares,
Conditionally Authorized 364,434 Shares, Issued 758,447
Shares at March 31, 2010 and at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
761,077 |
|
|
|
761,077 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
4,640,579 |
|
|
|
4,642,800 |
|
Treasury Shares, Net |
|
|
(573,847 |
) |
|
|
(616,048 |
) |
Retained Earnings |
|
|
4,388,413 |
|
|
|
4,456,770 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
94,260 |
|
|
|
114,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherford Shareholders Equity |
|
|
9,310,482 |
|
|
|
9,359,341 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
76,963 |
|
|
|
79,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
9,387,445 |
|
|
|
9,438,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
18,725,776 |
|
|
$ |
18,696,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
781,056 |
|
|
$ |
742,900 |
|
Services |
|
|
1,550,011 |
|
|
|
1,511,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331,067 |
|
|
|
2,254,631 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products |
|
|
573,797 |
|
|
|
567,256 |
|
Cost of Services |
|
|
1,178,663 |
|
|
|
971,356 |
|
Research and Development |
|
|
48,857 |
|
|
|
49,021 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments |
|
|
337,936 |
|
|
|
309,081 |
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
84,253 |
|
|
|
52,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,223,506 |
|
|
|
1,949,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
107,561 |
|
|
|
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
(95,339 |
) |
|
|
(91,063 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar |
|
|
(63,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
(9,218 |
) |
|
|
(13,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(60,855 |
) |
|
|
200,684 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
(63,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(64,322 |
) |
|
|
136,866 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
(8,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford |
|
$ |
(68,357 |
) |
|
$ |
128,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Weatherford: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
737,865 |
|
|
|
698,327 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
737,865 |
|
|
|
702,636 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(64,322 |
) |
|
$ |
136,866 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
249,705 |
|
|
|
201,394 |
|
Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense |
|
|
22,974 |
|
|
|
26,429 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Benefit |
|
|
(91,651 |
) |
|
|
(27,593 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar |
|
|
63,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
38,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration |
|
|
11,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
7,646 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effect of Businesses Acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
(211,917 |
) |
|
|
154,317 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(99,094 |
) |
|
|
(148,214 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
128,522 |
|
|
|
53,453 |
|
Other |
|
|
(49,797 |
) |
|
|
(234,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
166,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
(231,087 |
) |
|
|
(583,719 |
) |
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired |
|
|
(46,579 |
) |
|
|
(7,094 |
) |
Acquisition of Intellectual Property |
|
|
(6,072 |
) |
|
|
(10,196 |
) |
Acquisition of Equity Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,509 |
) |
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net |
|
|
87,790 |
|
|
|
30,616 |
|
Other Investing Activities |
|
|
41,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(154,108 |
) |
|
|
(596,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (Repayments) of Short-term Debt, Net |
|
|
122,746 |
|
|
|
(873,938 |
) |
Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-term Debt, Net |
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
|
1,231,209 |
|
Other Financing Activities, Net |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
123,860 |
|
|
|
353,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(20,128 |
) |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(45,420 |
) |
|
|
(76,682 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
252,519 |
|
|
|
238,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
|
$ |
161,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid |
|
$ |
139,597 |
|
|
$ |
98,725 |
|
Income Taxes Paid, Net of Refunds |
|
|
90,735 |
|
|
|
128,632 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(64,322 |
) |
|
$ |
136,866 |
|
Other Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
45,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Pension Components |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
(67,387 |
) |
|
|
(50,060 |
) |
Other |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
(84,804 |
) |
|
|
88,137 |
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
(8,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford |
|
$ |
(88,839 |
) |
|
$ |
79,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. General
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Weatherford
International Ltd. and all majority-owned subsidiaries (the Company) are prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include all adjustments of a normal
recurring nature which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2010, Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income,
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Although we believe the disclosures
in these financial statements are adequate to make the restated interim information presented not
misleading, certain information relating to our organization and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q/A pursuant to U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 as restated and presented in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The restated results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results
expected for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period and disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an
ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to uncollectible accounts
receivable, lower of cost or market of inventories, equity investments, intangible assets and
goodwill, property, plant and equipment, income taxes, percentage-of-completion accounting for
long-term contracts, self-insurance, pension and post retirement benefit plans and contingent
liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Weatherford International Ltd.,
all majority-owned subsidiaries, all controlled joint ventures and variable interest entities where
the Company has determined it is the primary beneficiary. When referring to Weatherford and using
phrases such as we, us, and our, the intent is to refer to Weatherford International Ltd. and
its subsidiaries as a whole or on a regional basis, depending on the context in which the
statements are made.
Investments in affiliates in which we exercise significant influence over operating and
financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. All material intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
7
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
2. Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
We identified a material weakness in our internal controls over the accounting for income
taxes in 2010 that resulted in the identification of certain errors in our income tax accounts. The
correction of these errors resulted in restatements of our previously reported financial statements
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, including beginning retained earnings in
2008, and our condensed consolidated financial statements for each of the quarters within 2009 and
2010. The restated annual results for 2008 and 2009 were included in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. In addition, we have amended this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to restate results as
of March 31, 2010 and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The most significant adjustment for the errors identified relates to the correction of our
accounting for the income tax consequences of certain intercompany transactions that were
inappropriately tax-effected over multiple years. This error resulted in the understatement of
income tax expense by $13 million and $32 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. We also recorded other adjustments to our tax provision to correct for certain
errors and items recorded in the improper period. These adjustments were not recorded previously
as we concluded that they were not material to the respective periods. These other adjustments
resulted in an increase to our tax provision during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 of $6 million, which is primarily
comprised of minimum tax in Mexico. Our tax provision was reduced by
less than $1 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 for these other tax
adjustments.
In addition, we recorded other adjustments to correct for previously identified immaterial
errors affecting operating income that were recorded in improper periods. These adjustments were
not recorded previously as we concluded that these adjustments were not material to the respective
periods. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
operating income was reduced by $9 million and $5 million, respectively. The impact of these adjustments on operating cash flows was
less than $1 million for the three months ended March, 31, 2010 and 2009.
The following tables summarize the impact of these adjustments on our previously reported
results filed on our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
8
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated income statement for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
781,056 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
781,056 |
|
Services |
|
|
1,557,192 |
|
|
|
(7,181 |
) |
|
|
1,550,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,338,248 |
|
|
|
(7,181 |
) |
|
|
2,331,067 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products |
|
|
573,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,797 |
|
Cost of Services |
|
|
1,175,523 |
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
1,178,663 |
|
Research and Development |
|
|
48,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,857 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable
to Segments |
|
|
336,845 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
337,936 |
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
86,315 |
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
84,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,221,337 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
2,223,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
116,911 |
|
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
|
|
107,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
(95,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,339 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar |
|
|
(63,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,859 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
(9,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(51,505 |
) |
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
|
|
(60,855 |
) |
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes |
|
|
15,531 |
|
|
|
(18,998 |
) |
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(35,974 |
) |
|
|
(28,348 |
) |
|
|
(64,322 |
) |
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Weatherford |
|
$ |
(40,009 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(68,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Weatherford: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
737,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737,865 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
737,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737,865 |
|
9
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated income statement for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
742,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
742,900 |
|
Services |
|
|
1,513,241 |
|
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
|
1,511,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,256,141 |
|
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
|
2,254,631 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products |
|
|
569,056 |
|
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
|
567,256 |
|
Cost of Services |
|
|
965,464 |
|
|
|
5,892 |
|
|
|
971,356 |
|
Research and Development |
|
|
49,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,021 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Attributable
to Segments |
|
|
308,744 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
309,081 |
|
Corporate General and Administrative |
|
|
53,131 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
52,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,945,416 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
1,949,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
310,725 |
|
|
|
(5,439 |
) |
|
|
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
(91,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,063 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
(13,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
206,123 |
|
|
|
(5,439 |
) |
|
|
200,684 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
(32,463 |
) |
|
|
(31,355 |
) |
|
|
(63,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
173,660 |
|
|
|
(36,794 |
) |
|
|
136,866 |
|
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
(8,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford |
|
$ |
164,802 |
|
|
$ |
(36,794 |
) |
|
$ |
128,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Attributable to Weatherford: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
698,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698,327 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
702,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702,636 |
|
10
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The effects of the restatements on our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
2,655,677 |
|
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
|
2,654,568 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,316,155 |
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
2,315,337 |
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
258,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,790 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
889,984 |
|
|
|
(224,443 |
) |
|
|
665,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
6,327,705 |
|
|
|
(226,370 |
) |
|
|
6,101,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment at Cost |
|
|
10,485,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,485,966 |
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
3,602,222 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
3,604,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,883,744 |
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
6,881,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,141,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,141,362 |
|
Other Intangible Assets |
|
|
761,716 |
|
|
|
(6,888 |
) |
|
|
754,828 |
|
Equity Investments |
|
|
538,621 |
|
|
|
(5,373 |
) |
|
|
533,248 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
304,611 |
|
|
|
8,848 |
|
|
|
313,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
18,957,759 |
|
|
$ |
(231,983 |
) |
|
$ |
18,725,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term
Debt |
|
$ |
991,440 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
991,440 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
1,121,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121,175 |
|
Income Taxes Payable |
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
160,570 |
|
|
|
171,586 |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
|
|
829,847 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
836,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
2,953,478 |
|
|
|
167,370 |
|
|
|
3,120,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
5,844,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,844,610 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
383,547 |
|
|
|
(10,674 |
) |
|
|
372,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
9,181,635 |
|
|
|
156,696 |
|
|
|
9,338,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
761,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,077 |
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value |
|
|
4,640,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,640,579 |
|
Treasury Shares, at Cost |
|
|
(573,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(573,847 |
) |
Retained Earnings |
|
|
4,777,092 |
|
|
|
(388,679 |
) |
|
|
4,388,413 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
94,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherford Shareholders Equity |
|
|
9,699,161 |
|
|
|
(388,679 |
) |
|
|
9,310,482 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
76,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
9,776,124 |
|
|
|
(388,679 |
) |
|
|
9,387,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
18,957,759 |
|
|
$ |
(231,983 |
) |
|
$ |
18,725,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated cash flow for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(35,974 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,322 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
249,392 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
249,705 |
|
Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense |
|
|
22,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,974 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Benefit |
|
|
(93,623 |
) |
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
(91,651 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar |
|
|
63,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,859 |
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
38,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,021 |
|
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration |
|
|
7,810 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
11,010 |
|
Other, Net |
|
|
14,646 |
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
7,646 |
|
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effect of Businesses
Acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
(219,098 |
) |
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
(211,917 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(98,444 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(99,094 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
128,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,522 |
|
Other |
|
|
(72,554 |
) |
|
|
22,757 |
|
|
|
(49,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
5,531 |
|
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
(231,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,087 |
) |
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired |
|
|
(46,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,579 |
) |
Acquisition of Intellectual Property |
|
|
(6,647 |
) |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
(6,072 |
) |
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net |
|
|
87,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,790 |
|
Other Investing Activities |
|
|
41,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(154,683 |
) |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
(154,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (Repayments) of Short-term Debt, Net |
|
|
122,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,746 |
|
Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-term Debt, Net |
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
Other Financing Activities, Net |
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
123,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(20,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(45,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,420 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
252,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The effects of the restatements on our condensed consolidated cash flow for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjustments |
|
Restated |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
173,660 |
|
|
$ |
(36,794 |
) |
|
$ |
136,866 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
201,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,394 |
|
Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense |
|
|
26,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,429 |
|
Deferred Income Tax Provision |
|
|
(23,594 |
) |
|
|
(3,999 |
) |
|
|
(27,593 |
) |
Other, Net |
|
|
5,146 |
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
4,486 |
|
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Net of Effect of Businesses
Acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
152,807 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
154,317 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(147,536 |
) |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
(148,214 |
) |
Accounts Payable |
|
|
53,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,453 |
|
Other |
|
|
(274,201 |
) |
|
|
39,721 |
|
|
|
(234,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
167,558 |
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
166,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
(583,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(583,719 |
) |
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired |
|
|
(7,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,094 |
) |
Acquisition of Intellectual Property |
|
|
(11,096 |
) |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(10,196 |
) |
Acquisition of Equity Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates |
|
|
(26,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,509 |
) |
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and Businesses, Net |
|
|
30,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(597,802 |
) |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(596,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (Repayments) of Short-term Debt, Net |
|
|
(873,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(873,938 |
) |
Borrowings (Repayments) of Long-term Debt, Net |
|
|
1,231,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231,209 |
|
Other Financing Activities, Net |
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
353,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(76,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,682 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
238,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
|
$ |
161,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
3. Business Combinations
We have acquired businesses we feel are important to our long-term growth strategy. Results of
operations for acquisitions are included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income from the date of acquisition. The balances included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets related to recent acquisitions are based on preliminary information and are subject to
change when final asset valuations are obtained and the potential for liabilities has been
evaluated. The purchase price is allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition.
In July 2009, we acquired the Oilfield Services Division (OFS) of TNK-BP. In this
transaction, we acquired drilling, well workover and cementing services operations in West Siberia,
East Siberia and the Volga-Urals region. We issued 24.3 million shares valued at approximately $450
million. In addition, if TNK-BP sells the shares it received in consideration for the transaction
for a price less than $18.50 per share prior to June 29, 2010, we are obligated to pay TNK-BP
additional consideration in an amount equal to the difference between the price at which the shares
were sold and $18.50. We will pay any additional consideration in cash or, at our option in certain
instances, in additional shares following such date. We made a preliminary allocation of the
purchase price as of the date of the acquisition. We will continue to adjust the allocations until
final valuation of the assets and liabilities are completed.
Accounting guidance for business combinations requires contingent consideration to be
recognized at its acquisition date fair value. Based on the terms of the arrangement, we classified
the contingent consideration as a liability. Such liabilities are required to be remeasured to fair
value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, with changes in fair value being
recognized in earnings. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration for the OFS
acquisition at the date of acquisition to be a liability of $84 million and $60 million at December
31, 2009. This liability was estimated to have a fair value of $71 million at March 31, 2010,
resulting in the recognition of an $11 million loss during the first three months of 2010. This
loss was recorded in the Selling, General and Administrative Attributable to Segments line in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. The valuation of the contingent consideration was determined
using a lattice-based model incorporating the term of the contingency, the price of our shares over
the relevant periods and the volatility of our stock price.
In November 2008, we acquired a group of affiliated companies in Latin America, which provide
project management services, drilling fluids, contract drilling and environmental services in that
region. Consideration for the transaction totaled approximately $160 million, which was comprised
of approximately six million shares valued at approximately $65 million, non-cash consideration of
approximately $75 million and cash of approximately $20 million. Additional consideration of up to
$65 million in cash or the issuance of shares of equivalent value, at our option, is contingent on
the occurrence of future events and circumstances. We will record this contingent consideration
when and if these events occur.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we paid $44 million to TNK-BP related to working
capital adjustments in connection with the OFS acquisition. In addition, we paid cash consideration
of $2 million and approximately 1.8 million common shares valued at $28 million for other
acquisitions.
4. Inventories
The components of inventory were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials, components and supplies |
|
$ |
337,061 |
|
|
|
$ |
328,253 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
117,082 |
|
|
|
|
115,564 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
1,861,194 |
|
|
|
|
1,794,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,315,337 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,238,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work in process and finished goods inventories include the cost of materials, labor and plant
overhead.
14
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
5. Goodwill
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We perform our annual
goodwill impairment test as of October 1. Our 2009 impairment tests indicated goodwill was not
impaired. We will continue to test our goodwill annually as of October 1 unless events occur or
circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East/ |
|
Europe/ |
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
North Africa/ |
|
West Africa/ |
|
Latin |
|
|
|
America |
|
Asia |
|
FSU |
|
America |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,097,549 |
|
|
|
$ |
698,896 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,045,577 |
|
|
|
$ |
314,083 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,156,105 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price and other adjustments |
|
|
(3,482 |
) |
|
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
|
(906 |
) |
|
|
|
(6,124 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
16,299 |
|
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
(27,803 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
|
(12,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,113,829 |
|
|
|
$ |
699,794 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,016,681 |
|
|
|
$ |
311,058 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,141,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6. Short-term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-term Debt
The components of short-term borrowings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revolving credit facilities |
|
$ |
943,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
798,500 |
|
Commercial paper program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other short-term bank loans |
|
|
30,849 |
|
|
|
|
53,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
973,849 |
|
|
|
|
851,507 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
17,591 |
|
|
|
|
18,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
991,440 |
|
|
|
$ |
869,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We maintain various revolving credit facilities with syndicates of banks that can be used for
a combination of borrowings, support for our commercial paper program and issuances of letters of
credit. At March 31, 2010, these facilities allow for an aggregate availability of $1.8 billion and
mature in May 2011. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings of these
facilities at March 31, 2010 was 1.0%. There were $75 million in outstanding letters of credit
under these facilities at March 31, 2010.
These borrowing facilities require us to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of less than
60% and contain other covenants and representations customary for an investment-grade commercial
credit. We are in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2010.
We have a $1.5 billion commercial paper program under which we may from time to time issue
short-term unsecured notes. The commercial paper program is supported by our revolving credit
facilities. There was no commercial paper outstanding at March 31, 2010.
We have short-term borrowings with various domestic and international institutions pursuant to
uncommitted facilities. At March 31, 2010, we had $31 million in short-term borrowings under these
arrangements with a weighted average interest rate of 1.4%. In addition, we had $276 million of
letters of credit and bid and performance bonds under these uncommitted facilities. The carrying
value of our short-term borrowings approximates their fair value as of March 31, 2010.
7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial Instruments Measured and Recognized at Fair Value
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements establishes a valuation hierarchy for
disclosure of the inputs to the valuations used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes
the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based upon our own assumptions used to
measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liabilitys classification
within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement.
The following table presents our non-derivative assets and liabilities that are measured and
recognized at fair value on a recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the fair
value hierarchy as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration on acquisition (See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,573 |
|
|
|
|
70,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,822 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,822 |
|
Other Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration on acquisition (See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,563 |
|
|
|
|
59,563 |
|
16
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
During the first quarter of 2010, we received proceeds of approximately $42 million from the
redemption of our other investments recorded at fair value at December 31, 2009. The proceeds are
included in investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the
period ended March 31, 2010.
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of our Level 3 financial
liability for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Ended March 31, |
|
2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
59,563 |
|
Contingent consideration on acquisition (See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on contingent consideration on acquisition included in earnings |
|
|
11,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
70,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
The $11 million loss recorded during the first quarter of 2010 is included in the Selling,
General and Administrative Attributable to Segments line in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
Our other financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, foreign currency exchange
contracts, interest rate swaps, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and short
and long-term debt. With the exception of long-term debt, the carrying value of these financial
instruments approximates their fair value.
The fair value of outstanding debt fluctuates with changes in applicable interest rates. Fair
value will exceed carrying value when the current market interest rate is lower than the interest
rate at which the debt was originally issued. The fair value of a companys debt is a measure of
its current value under present market conditions. It does not impact the financial statements
under current accounting rules. The fair value of our long-term debt was established based on
quoted market prices.
The fair value and carrying value of our long-term debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
6,392,261 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,285,129 |
|
Carrying value |
|
|
5,844,610 |
|
|
|
|
5,847,258 |
|
8. Derivative Instruments
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency and changes in interest rates.
From time to time, we may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or
reduce our market risk, but we do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes.
We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and
we may employ interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that goal. The major risks from interest
rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such
instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest
rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. In light of events in
the global credit markets and the potential impact of these events on the liquidity of the banking
industry, we continue to monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties, which are
multinational commercial banks.
The fair values of all our outstanding derivative instruments are determined using a model
with Level 2 inputs including quoted market prices for contracts with similar terms and maturity
dates.
Interest Rate Swaps
We use interest rate swaps to help mitigate exposures related to interest rate movements.
Amounts received upon termination of the swaps accounted for as fair value hedges represent the
fair value of the agreements at the time of termination and are recorded as an adjustment to the
carrying value of the related debt. These amounts are being amortized as a reduction to interest
expense over the
17
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
remaining term of the debt. We have no interest rate swaps outstanding at March 31, 2010. As of
March 31, 2010, we had net unamortized gains of $67 million, associated with interest rate swap
terminations.
Cash Flow Hedges
In 2008, we entered into interest rate derivative instruments to hedge projected exposures to
interest rates in anticipation of a debt offering. Those hedges were terminated at the time of the
issuance of the debt, and the loss on these hedges is being amortized from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. As of March 31, 2010,
we had net unamortized losses of $13 million associated with our cash flow hedge terminations.
Other Derivative Instruments
As of March 31, 2010, we had several foreign currency forward and option contracts with
notional amounts aggregating to $620 million, which were entered into to hedge exposure to currency
fluctuations in various foreign currencies, including, but not limited to, the British pound
sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krone. The total estimated fair value of
these contracts at March 31, 2010 resulted in a net liability of approximately $8 million. These
derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts
are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income.
We have cross-currency swaps between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar to hedge certain
exposures to the Canadian dollar. At March 31, 2010, we had notional amounts outstanding of $335
million. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at March 31, 2010 resulted in a
liability of $33 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the
changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The fair values of outstanding derivative instruments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Classifications |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Derivative assets not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,831 |
|
|
Other Current Assets |
Derivative liabilities not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
15,872 |
|
|
|
|
18,939 |
|
|
Other Current Liabilities |
Cross-currency swap contracts |
|
|
33,293 |
|
|
|
|
26,170 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
9. Income Taxes
For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had a tax provision of $3 million on a pretax
loss of $61 million that includes curtailment expense on our SERP for which no related tax benefit
was recorded. Our tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2010 includes minimum tax in
Mexico, and the tax impact of changes in our geographic earnings mix, both of which are partially
offset by a tax benefit related to the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar. Our effective tax rate
was a provision of 31.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
18
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10. Shareholders Equity
The following summarizes our shareholders equity activity for the period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
Company |
|
Interests in |
|
Shareholders |
|
Shareholders |
|
Consolidated |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
9,438,373 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,359,341 |
|
|
|
$ |
79,032 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(64,322 |
) |
|
|
|
(68,357 |
) |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
Curtailment of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
45,237 |
|
|
|
|
45,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Pension Components |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
|
|
(67,387 |
) |
|
|
|
(67,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
(84,804 |
) |
|
|
|
(88,839 |
) |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
Transactions with Shareholders |
|
|
39,980 |
|
|
|
|
39,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
(6,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,442 |
) |
Other |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,387,445 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,310,482 |
|
|
|
$ |
76,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share for all periods presented equals net income divided by the weighted
average number of our shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of our shares outstanding during the period,
adjusted for the dilutive effect of our stock option and restricted share plans and our outstanding
warrants. Our diluted earnings per share calculation excludes three million potential shares for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 19 million potential shares for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, due to their antidilutive effect. Our diluted earnings per share calculation for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 also excludes 10 million potential shares that would have
been included if we had net income for that period, but are excluded as we had a net loss and their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The following reconciles basic and diluted weighted average of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
737,865 |
|
|
|
698,327 |
|
Dilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
737,865 |
|
|
|
702,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Share-Based Compensation
In March 2010, our compensation committee of our board of directors authorized the award of
performance units to officers under our 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Subsequently, we issued
707,000 performance units, which will vest ratably over a three-year period assuming continued
employment of the officer and if the Company meets certain market-based performance goals. The
performance units were valued at $13.19 based on the Monte Carlo simulation method.
We recognized the following employee share-based compensation expense during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
$ |
22,974 |
|
|
$ |
26,429 |
|
Related tax benefit |
|
|
8,041 |
|
|
|
9,250 |
|
19
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we granted one million restricted share awards
and units at a weighted average grant date fair value of $14.49 per share.
As of March 31, 2010, there was $216 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to our unvested stock options, restricted share grants, and units. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years.
13. Retirement and Employee Benefit Plans
We have defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans covering certain
employees. The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
|
States |
|
International |
|
States |
|
International |
|
(In thousands) |
Service cost |
|
$ |
951 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,604 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
(954 |
) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Amortization of loss |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
Curtailment/settlement loss |
|
|
34,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
39,981 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,899 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net curtailment loss shown above primarily represents the accelerated recognition of prior
service costs associated with the amendment of our SERP which was effective as of March 31, 2010
and resulted in the freezing of the benefits under this plan.
The freezing of the SERP may constitute good reason for five of our executive officers to
terminate their employment under their employment agreements, if they choose to do so, which would
entitle these officers to certain termination benefits. Our CEO entered into a new employment
agreement effectively waiving his right to assert good reason due to the freezing of the SERP.
However, one of our operational vice presidents, David Colley, has notified the Company of his
intention to terminate his employment for good reason, and we expect to record a charge of
approximately $4 million in connection with his termination and pay out total cash consideration of
approximately $7 million, both during 2010. The amount recorded related to the curtailment of the
SERP for the three months ended March 31, 2010 does not include any accrual for any executives
potential termination for good reason. If the remaining three executives were to terminate their
employment for good reason, we would anticipate recording an expense of approximately $25 million
and make total cash consideration payments of approximately $41 million.
We previously disclosed in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, that
we expected to contribute approximately $7 million to our pension and other postretirement benefit
plans during 2010. As of March 31, 2010, we have contributed approximately $2 million to these
plans and anticipate total annual contributions to approximate original estimates previously
disclosed and pay out total cash consideration of approximately $7 million, both during 2010.
20
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
14. Segment Information
Financial information by segment is summarized below. Revenues are attributable to countries
based on the ultimate destination of the sale of products or performance of services. Results for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 have been restated to correct for previously
identified immaterial errors affecting operating income that were recorded in improper periods (See
Note 2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Net |
|
Income |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Operating |
|
from |
|
and |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Operations |
|
Amortization |
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
(In thousands) |
North America |
|
$ |
888,579 |
|
|
|
$ |
108,432 |
|
|
|
$ |
80,660 |
|
Middle East/North Africa/Asia |
|
|
562,056 |
|
|
|
|
75,714 |
|
|
|
|
72,290 |
|
Europe/West Africa/FSU |
|
|
453,759 |
|
|
|
|
46,298 |
|
|
|
|
49,271 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
426,673 |
|
|
|
|
26,074 |
|
|
|
|
42,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331,067 |
|
|
|
|
256,518 |
|
|
|
|
244,700 |
|
Corporate and Research and Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,915 |
) |
|
|
|
5,005 |
|
Revaluation of Contingent consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,331,067 |
|
|
|
$ |
107,561 |
|
|
|
$ |
249,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Net |
|
Income |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Operating |
|
from |
|
and |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Operations |
|
Amortization |
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
North America |
|
$ |
831,995 |
|
|
|
$ |
116,748 |
|
|
|
$ |
75,098 |
|
Middle East/North Africa/Asia |
|
|
585,768 |
|
|
|
|
137,868 |
|
|
|
|
57,634 |
|
Europe/West Africa/FSU |
|
|
368,981 |
|
|
|
|
72,402 |
|
|
|
|
34,678 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
467,887 |
|
|
|
|
91,265 |
|
|
|
|
30,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,254,631 |
|
|
|
|
418,283 |
|
|
|
|
197,852 |
|
Corporate and Research and Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,120 |
) |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
Other (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,254,631 |
|
|
|
$ |
305,286 |
|
|
|
$ |
201,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The three months ended March 31, 2010 includes $2 million for
costs incurred in connection with on-going investigations by the
U.S. government, $9 million for severance and facility closure
costs associated with reorganization activities and a $38 million
charge related to our SERP which was frozen on March 31, 2010.
These changes were offset by a $5 million benefit related to the
reversal of prior cost accruals for our exit from certain
sanctioned countries. |
|
(b) |
|
The three months ended March 31, 2009 includes $12 million for
severance charges associated with reorganization activities and
$13 million in costs incurred in connection with on-going
investigations by the U.S. government. |
21
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
15. Disputes, Litigation and Contingencies
U.S. Government and Internal Investigations
We are currently involved in government and
internal investigations involving various areas of
our operations.
Until 2003, we participated in the United Nations oil-for-food program governing
sales of goods and services into Iraq. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC have
undertaken investigations of our participation in the oil-for-food program and have subpoenaed
certain documents in connection with these investigations. We have cooperated fully with these
investigations. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate
this matter. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but
we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the
investigations, financial or otherwise.
The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security, Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC), DOJ and SEC have undertaken investigations of allegations of improper sales of
products and services by the Company and its subsidiaries in certain sanctioned countries. We have
cooperated fully with this investigation. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit
committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with these agencies. We have begun
negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate
the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigation, financial
or otherwise.
In light of this investigation and of U.S. and foreign policy environment and the inherent
uncertainties surrounding these countries, we decided in September 2007 to direct our foreign
subsidiaries to discontinue doing business in countries that are subject to comprehensive U.S.
economic and trade sanctions, specifically Cuba, Iran, and Sudan, as well as Syria. Effective
September 2007, we ceased entering into any new contracts in these countries and began an orderly
discontinuation and winding down of our existing business in these sanctioned countries. Effective
March 31, 2008, we substantially completed our winding down of business in these countries. We can
complete the withdrawal process only pursuant to licenses issued by OFAC. Our remaining activities
in Iran, Sudan and Syria include ongoing withdrawal activities such as attempts to collect accounts
receivable, attempts to settle tax liabilities or legal claims and attempts to recover or liquidate
assets, including equipment and funds. Certain of our subsidiaries continue to conduct business in
countries such as Myanmar that are subject to more limited U.S. trading sanctions.
22
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The DOJ and SEC are investigating our compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(FCPA) and other laws worldwide. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit
committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with the DOJ and SEC. As part of
our investigations, we have uncovered potential violations of U.S. law in connection with
activities in West Africa. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve
these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate
resolution of the investigations, financial or otherwise.
The DOJ, SEC and other agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal
penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of trade
sanctions laws, the FCPA and other federal statutes including, but not limited to, injunctive
relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and compliance
programs. In recent years, these agencies and authorities have entered into agreements with, and
obtained a range of penalties against, several public corporations and individuals in similar
investigations, under which civil and criminal penalties were imposed, including in some cases
fines and other penalties and sanctions in the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. These
agencies are seeking to impose
penalties against us for past conduct, but the ultimate amount of any penalties we may pay
currently cannot be reasonably estimated. Under trade sanctions laws, the DOJ may also seek to
impose modifications to business practices, including immediate cessation of all business
activities in specific countries or other limitations that decrease our business, and modifications
to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs. Any injunctive relief, disgorgement,
fines, penalties, sanctions or imposed modifications to business practices resulting from these
investigations could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our historical
activities in sanctioned countries, such as Sudan and Iran, could result in certain investors, such
as government sponsored pension funds, divesting or not investing in our registered shares. Based
on available information, we cannot predict what, if any, actions the DOJ, SEC or other authorities
will take in our situation or the effect any such actions will have on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations. To the extent we violated trade sanctions laws, the FCPA, or
other laws or regulations, fines and other penalties may be imposed. Because these matters are now
pending before the indicated agencies, there can be no assurance that actual fines or penalties, if
any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or
results of operations.
Through
December 31, 2010, we have incurred $49 million for costs in connection with our exit from sanctioned
countries and incurred $113 million for legal and professional fees in connection with complying
with and conducting these on-going investigations.
23
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Macondo Litigation
On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon rig operating under contract with BP at the Macondo
well in the Gulf of Mexico exploded and sank, resulting in 11 deaths, several injuries and
significant damages to property and the environment.
Weatherford provided the following services and products to BP on the Macondo well: (1)
connected and tightened four intermediate casing strings and one tapered production string (long
string); (2) furnished a liner hanger on one casing string; (3) furnished centralizers, most of
which were not used in the well, and (4) provided float equipment on the long string. The float
equipment consisted of a reamer shoe, a float collar and wiper plugs. The float collar is designed
to control backflow or ingress of the cement through the shoe track while the cement hardens. At
the time of the explosion, Weatherford had two employees on the Deepwater Horizon; they sustained
minor injuries.
As a result of the explosion, approximately 400 lawsuits were filed, mainly for personal
injuries, wrongful death and pollution damage. Weatherford is currently named, along with BP and
other defendants, in several dozen of these lawsuits. The United States Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation issued an order centralizing most of these cases in the Federal District
Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The pollution damage complaints generally refer to
the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and allege, among other things, negligence and gross
negligence by Weatherford and other defendants. They allege that Weatherford and the other
defendants are responsible for property damage, trespass, nuisance and economic loss as a result of
environmental pollution and generally seek awards of unspecified economic, compensatory, and
punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief. Additional lawsuits may be filed in the future
relating to the Macondo incident.
Weatherford was not designated as a Responsible Party, as that term is defined by OPA.
Therefore, Weatherford was not charged with responsibility for cleaning up the oil or handling any
claims. The Responsible Party may make a claim for contribution against any other party it alleges
contributed to the oil spill. Since Weatherford has not been named a Responsible Party, we intend
to seek to be dismissed from any and all OPA-related claims and to seek indemnity from any and all
liability under OPA.
In the master service contract between BP and Weatherford, under which Weatherford provided
products and services to BP related to the Macondo well, BP agreed to save, indemnify, release,
defend and hold harmless [Weatherford, its subcontractors and their affiliates, directors, officers
and employees] from and against any claim of whatsoever nature arising from pollution and/or
contamination including without limitation such pollution or contamination from the reservoir. BP
further agreed to save, indemnify, release, defend and hold harmless [Weatherford, its
subcontractors and their affiliates, directors, officers and employees] from and against any
claims, losses, damages, costs (including legal costs) expenses and liabilities resulting
from...blowout, fire, explosion, cratering or any uncontrolled well condition (including the costs
to control a wild well and the removal of debris). These indemnity provisions include direct
claims asserted against Weatherford by third parties and any claim by BP for contribution under
OPA. These indemnities apply regardless of the cause of the condition giving rise to the claim.
The indemnities exclude claims for injury to Weatherfords employees and subcontractors. However,
as injuries to our two employees were minor, we do not anticipate any significant liabilities with
respect to our employees.
We believe that the indemnification obligations of BP are valid and enforceable. However, BP
may seek to avoid its indemnification obligations. Should a court determine that the wrongful death
and personal injury indemnity provisions are unenforceable, Weatherford might be liable for
injuries to, or the death of, BP personnel and personnel of third party contractors if a case is
adversely determined. The cause of the Macondo incident remains under investigation and has yet
to be determined.
24
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
If BP were to avoid its indemnities regarding personal injury and a case is adversely
determined against Weatherford with respect to the Macondo incident, Weatherford believes its
exposure to personal injury/death claims is within the limits of its insurance coverage.
Weatherford has a self-insured retention of $2 million. Above that amount, Weatherford has
aggregate liability insurance coverage with limits of $303 million. Weatherford believes all
claims for personal injury made against Weatherford, even if they are not covered by indemnity from
BP, are covered under its various liability insurance policies, up to the $303 million in limits.
Weatherford has met individually with its insurers to discuss this matter. While some of our
insurers have sent notices stating that they lack sufficient information to adequately assess
coverage issues at this time, we do not currently anticipate there will be a substantive coverage
dispute amongst Weatherford and its insurers.
We do not expect that we will have liability for these claims, but the litigation surrounding
these matters is complex and likely to continue for some time, and the damages claimed are
significant. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these claims.
Weatherford is cooperating fully with the investigations of the accident initiated by various
agencies of the U.S. Government and, to the extent requested, has responded to several subpoenas,
information and document requests, and requests for testimony of employees.
Shareholder Litigation
In June and July 2010, shareholders filed suit in Weatherfords name against those directors
in place before June 2010 and certain current and former members of management relating to the U.S.
government and internal investigations disclosed above and in our SEC filings since 2007. In March
2011, shareholders filed suit relating to the matters described in
Note 2. We will investigate these claims appropriately. We cannot predict the ultimate
outcome of these claims.
Other Disputes
As a result of discussions with a customer, we reviewed how the dual exchange rate might
affect amounts we receive for our U.S. dollar-denominated receivables in Venezuela. We believe our
contracts are legally enforceable and our customers continue to accept our invoices. However,
based on the current political and economic environment in Venezuela, we believe a loss is
probable. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve of $32 million against this exposure in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Our former Senior Vice President and General Counsel (the Executive) left the Company in
June 2009. The Executive had employment agreements with us that terminated on his departure.
There is currently a dispute between the Executive and us as to the amount of compensation we are
obligated to pay under these employment agreements based on the Executives separation. This
dispute has not resulted in a lawsuit being filed. It is our belief that an unfavorable outcome
regarding this dispute is not probable, and as such, we have not accrued for $9 million of the
Executives claimed severance and other benefits.
Additionally, we are aware of various disputes and potential claims and are a party in various
litigation involving claims against us, some of which are covered by insurance. For claims,
disputes and pending litigation in which we believe a negative outcome is probable and a loss can
be reasonably estimated, we have recorded a liability for the expected loss. These liabilities are
immaterial to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition we have certain
claims, disputes and pending litigation in which we do not believe a negative outcome is probable.
If one or more negative outcomes were to occur, the impact to our financial condition could be as
high as $180 million.
16. New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for
arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update will allow companies to allocate consideration
received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling price for both delivered and
undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable.
Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of
deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors
and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. We will adopt this update
for new revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011. We do
not expect the provisions of this update to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
25
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
17. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 2, we have restated results of operations and cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and we have restated our financial position at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
A Swiss corporation named Weatherford International Ltd. is the ultimate parent of the
Weatherford group (Parent). The Parent guarantees the obligations of Weatherford International
Ltd. incorporated in Bermuda (Weatherford Bermuda) and Weatherford International, Inc.
incorporated in Delaware (Weatherford Delaware) noted below.
The following obligations of Weatherford Delaware were guaranteed by Weatherford Bermuda at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (i) the 6.625% Senior Notes, (ii) the 5.95% Senior Notes,
(iii) the 6.35% Senior Notes and (iv) the 6.80% Senior Notes.
The following obligations of Weatherford Bermuda were guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (i) the revolving credit facilities, (ii) the 4.95% Senior
Notes, (iii) the 5.50% Senior Notes, (iv) the 6.50% Senior Notes, (v) the 5.15% Senior Notes, (vi)
the 6.00% Senior Notes, (vii) the 7.00% Senior Notes (viii) the 9.625% Senior Notes, (ix) the
9.875% Senior Notes and (x) issuances of notes under the commercial paper program.
As a result of these guarantee arrangements, we are required to present the following
condensed consolidating financial information. The accompanying guarantor financial information is
presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method,
investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for our share in the subsidiaries
cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions and other changes in
equity. Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination of investments in subsidiaries and
associated intercompany balances and transactions.
26
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
March 31, 2010
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Bermuda |
|
Delaware |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidation |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
205,562 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
10,276 |
|
|
|
101,798 |
|
|
|
5,778,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,894,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
101,849 |
|
|
|
5,983,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,101,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investments in Affiliates |
|
|
8,479,942 |
|
|
|
14,942,609 |
|
|
|
6,660,944 |
|
|
|
12,092,435 |
|
|
|
(42,175,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares Held in Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,372 |
|
|
|
468,800 |
|
|
|
(574,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Receivables, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,872,468 |
|
|
|
978,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,851,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
9,270 |
|
|
|
27,296 |
|
|
|
185,889 |
|
|
|
12,401,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,624,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
8,494,584 |
|
|
$ |
16,852,673 |
|
|
$ |
8,032,866 |
|
|
$ |
30,947,035 |
|
|
$ |
(45,601,382 |
) |
|
$ |
18,725,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Borrowings and
Current Portion of Long-term
Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
576,102 |
|
|
$ |
1,897 |
|
|
$ |
413,441 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
991,440 |
|
Accounts Payable and Other
Current Liabilities |
|
|
10,140 |
|
|
|
44,560 |
|
|
|
139,352 |
|
|
|
1,935,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,129,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
10,140 |
|
|
|
620,662 |
|
|
|
141,249 |
|
|
|
2,348,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,120,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,987,773 |
|
|
|
1,847,871 |
|
|
|
8,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,844,610 |
|
Intercompany Payables, Net |
|
|
95,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,755,526 |
|
|
|
(2,851,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Long-term Liabilities |
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
99,704 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
264,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
112,110 |
|
|
|
4,708,139 |
|
|
|
1,991,385 |
|
|
|
5,377,977 |
|
|
|
(2,851,280 |
) |
|
|
9,338,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherford Shareholders Equity |
|
|
8,382,474 |
|
|
|
12,144,534 |
|
|
|
6,041,481 |
|
|
|
25,492,095 |
|
|
|
(42,750,102 |
) |
|
|
9,310,482 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
8,494,584 |
|
|
$ |
16,852,673 |
|
|
$ |
8,032,866 |
|
|
$ |
30,947,035 |
|
|
$ |
(45,601,382 |
) |
|
$ |
18,725,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2009
(Restated)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Bermuda |
|
Delaware |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidation |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
$ |
251,949 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
252,519 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
11,163 |
|
|
|
98,033 |
|
|
|
5,619,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,729,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
11,210 |
|
|
|
98,454 |
|
|
|
5,871,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,981,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Investments in Affiliates |
|
|
9,183,803 |
|
|
|
14,952,128 |
|
|
|
6,527,676 |
|
|
|
11,441,274 |
|
|
|
(42,104,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares Held in Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,268 |
|
|
|
507,780 |
|
|
|
(616,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany Receivables, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671,487 |
|
|
|
1,017,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,688,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
9,376 |
|
|
|
68,960 |
|
|
|
190,174 |
|
|
|
12,446,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,714,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
9,193,777 |
|
|
$ |
16,703,785 |
|
|
$ |
7,941,787 |
|
|
$ |
30,266,972 |
|
|
$ |
(45,409,631 |
) |
|
$ |
18,696,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Borrowings and
Current Portion of Long-Term
Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
352,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
515,340 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
869,581 |
|
Accounts Payable and Other
Current Liabilities |
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
107,984 |
|
|
|
116,404 |
|
|
|
1,860,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,131,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
46,160 |
|
|
|
460,357 |
|
|
|
118,272 |
|
|
|
2,375,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,700 |
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,988,162 |
|
|
|
1,848,191 |
|
|
|
10,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,847,258 |
|
Intercompany Payables, Net |
|
|
36,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,652,091 |
|
|
|
(2,688,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Long-term Liabilities |
|
|
8,132 |
|
|
|
132,155 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
267,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
90,903 |
|
|
|
4,580,674 |
|
|
|
1,968,772 |
|
|
|
5,306,670 |
|
|
|
(2,688,702 |
) |
|
|
9,258,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherford Shareholders Equity |
|
|
9,102,874 |
|
|
|
12,123,111 |
|
|
|
5,973,015 |
|
|
|
24,881,270 |
|
|
|
(42,720,929 |
) |
|
|
9,359,341 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
9,193,777 |
|
|
$ |
16,703,785 |
|
|
$ |
7,941,787 |
|
|
$ |
30,266,972 |
|
|
$ |
(45,409,631 |
) |
|
$ |
18,696,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Bermuda |
|
Delaware |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidation |
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,331,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,331,067 |
|
Costs and Expenses |
|
|
(15,249 |
) |
|
|
(39,358 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(2,168,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,223,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
(15,249 |
) |
|
|
(39,358 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
162,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income (Expense), Net |
|
|
(947 |
) |
|
|
(64,200 |
) |
|
|
(28,848 |
) |
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95,339 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,859 |
) |
Intercompany Charges, Net |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(43,553 |
) |
|
|
43,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Subsidiary Income (Loss) |
|
|
(51,818 |
) |
|
|
(10,391 |
) |
|
|
133,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
61,412 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(70,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(68,357 |
) |
|
|
(51,820 |
) |
|
|
60,059 |
|
|
|
70,312 |
|
|
|
(71,049 |
) |
|
|
(60,855 |
) |
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,147 |
|
|
|
(28,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(68,357 |
) |
|
|
(51,820 |
) |
|
|
85,206 |
|
|
|
41,698 |
|
|
|
(71,049 |
) |
|
|
(64,322 |
) |
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford |
|
$ |
(68,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,820 |
) |
|
$ |
85,206 |
|
|
$ |
37,663 |
|
|
$ |
(71,049 |
) |
|
$ |
(68,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Bermuda |
|
Delaware |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidation |
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,254,631 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,254,631 |
|
Costs and Expenses |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(6,508 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(1,942,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,949,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(6,508 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
312,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income (Expense), Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,052 |
) |
|
|
(28,431 |
) |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,063 |
) |
Intercompany Charges, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
(24,897 |
) |
|
|
22,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Subsidiary Income |
|
|
128,023 |
|
|
|
127,775 |
|
|
|
215,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(471,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,840 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(82,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Before Income Taxes |
|
|
128,008 |
|
|
|
128,023 |
|
|
|
162,019 |
|
|
|
254,411 |
|
|
|
(471,777 |
) |
|
|
200,684 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,830 |
|
|
|
(82,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
128,008 |
|
|
|
128,023 |
|
|
|
180,849 |
|
|
|
171,763 |
|
|
|
(471,777 |
) |
|
|
136,866 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Weatherford |
|
$ |
128,008 |
|
|
$ |
128,023 |
|
|
$ |
180,849 |
|
|
$ |
162,905 |
|
|
$ |
(471,777 |
) |
|
$ |
128,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Bermuda |
|
Delaware |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidation |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(68,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,820 |
) |
|
$ |
85,206 |
|
|
$ |
41,698 |
|
|
$ |
(71,049 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,322 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss)
to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating
Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges from Parent or Subsidiary |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
|
43,553 |
|
|
|
(43,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (Earnings) Loss of Affiliates |
|
|
51,818 |
|
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
(133,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Tax (Benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,147 |
) |
|
|
(66,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,651 |
) |
Other Adjustments |
|
|
12,927 |
|
|
|
(97,022 |
) |
|
|
52,692 |
|
|
|
192,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Operating Activities |
|
|
(3,312 |
) |
|
|
(139,168 |
) |
|
|
23,046 |
|
|
|
124,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash
Acquired |
|
|
(44,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,579 |
) |
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant
and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,087 |
) |
Acquisition of Intellectual Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,072 |
) |
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and
Businesses, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,790 |
|
Capital Contribution to Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Investing Activities |
|
|
(44,489 |
) |
|
|
40,967 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(151,459 |
) |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
(154,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of (Repayments on) Short-term
Debt, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,730 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(101,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,746 |
|
Repayments on Long-term Debt, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
Borrowings (Repayments) Between
Subsidiaries, Net |
|
|
49,161 |
|
|
|
(125,552 |
) |
|
|
(26,662 |
) |
|
|
103,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Capital Contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Financing Activities |
|
|
49,161 |
|
|
|
98,178 |
|
|
|
(23,406 |
) |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
123,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate on Cash and Cash
Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(46,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,420 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
251,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
205,562 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(Restated)
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Bermuda |
|
Delaware |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidation |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
128,008 |
|
|
$ |
128,023 |
|
|
$ |
180,849 |
|
|
$ |
171,763 |
|
|
$ |
(471,777 |
) |
|
$ |
136,866 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss)
to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating
Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges from Parent or Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
24,897 |
|
|
|
(22,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (Earnings) Loss of Affiliates |
|
|
(128,023 |
) |
|
|
(127,775 |
) |
|
|
(215,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Tax Provision (Benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,986 |
|
|
|
(36,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,593 |
) |
Other Adjustments |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(96,426 |
) |
|
|
109,519 |
|
|
|
44,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,146 |
) |
|
|
108,272 |
|
|
|
156,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of Businesses, Net of Cash
Acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,094 |
) |
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant
and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(583,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(583,719 |
) |
Acquisition of Intellectual Property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,196 |
) |
Purchase of Equity Investment in
Unconsolidated Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,509 |
) |
Proceeds from Sale of Assets and
Businesses, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,616 |
|
Capital Contribution to Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331,584 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing
Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331,584 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(596,902 |
) |
|
|
331,623 |
|
|
|
(596,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of (Repayments on) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554,898 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(319,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(873,938 |
) |
Borrowings of (Repayments on) Long-term
Debt, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,233,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231,209 |
|
Borrowings (Repayments) Between
Subsidiaries, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248,671 |
) |
|
|
(104,301 |
) |
|
|
352,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Capital Contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,623 |
|
|
|
(331,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,732 |
|
|
|
(108,157 |
) |
|
|
363,436 |
|
|
|
(331,623 |
) |
|
|
353,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate on Cash and Cash
Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash
Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(76,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,682 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
238,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
161,462 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) begins with an executive level overview, which provides a general description of our
company today, a synopsis of industry market trends, insight into managements perspective of the
opportunities and challenges we face and our outlook for 2010. Next, we analyze the results of our
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, including the trends in our overall
business. Then we review our liquidity and capital resources. We conclude with a discussion of our
critical accounting policies and estimates and a summary of recently issued accounting
pronouncements. When using phrases such as Company, we, us and our the intent is to refer
to Weatherford International Ltd.
Overview
General
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related MD&A
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as restated and presented in our Annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our discussion includes various
forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and services and our
future results. These statements are based on certain assumptions we consider reasonable. For
information about these assumptions, you should refer to the section entitled Forward-Looking
Statements.
We provide equipment and services used for drilling, completion and production of oil and
natural gas wells throughout the world. We conduct operations in approximately 100 countries and
have service and sales locations in nearly all of the oil and natural gas producing regions in the
world. Our product offerings can be grouped into ten service lines: 1) drilling services; 2)
artificial lift systems; 3) well construction; 4) completion systems; 5) integrated drilling; 6)
drilling tools; 7) re-entry and fishing; 8) stimulation and chemicals services; 9) wireline and
evaluation services; and 10) pipeline and specialty services.
Industry Trends
Changes in the current price and expected future prices of oil and natural gas influence the
level of energy industry spending. Changes in expenditures result in an increased or decreased
demand for our products and services. Rig count is an indicator of the level of spending for the
exploration for and production of oil and natural gas reserves.
The following chart sets forth certain statistics that reflect historical market conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Hub |
|
North American |
|
International |
|
|
WTI Oil (1) |
|
Gas (2) |
|
Rig Count (3) |
|
Rig Count (3) |
March 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
83.76 |
|
|
$ |
3.87 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
79.36 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
49.90 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Price per barrel as of March 31 and December 31 Source: Thomson Reuters |
|
(2) |
|
Price per MM/BTU as of March 31 and December 31 Source: Thomson Reuters |
|
(3) |
|
Average rig count for the applicable month Source: Baker Hughes Rig Count and other third-party data |
Oil prices increased during the first three months of 2010, ranging from a low of $71.19 per
barrel in early February to a high of $83.76 per barrel at the end of March. Natural gas prices
decreased during the first quarter of 2010 and ranged from a high of $6.01 MM/BTU in early January
to a low of $3.84 MM/BTU near the end of March. Factors influencing oil and natural gas prices
during the period include hydrocarbon inventory levels, realized and expected economic growth,
realized and expected levels of hydrocarbon demand, levels of spare production capacity within the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), weather and geopolitical uncertainty.
32
Results of Operations
The following charts contain selected financial data comparing our consolidated and segment
results from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Results have been
restated in the following table. See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 2. Restatement of
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
(Restated) |
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages |
|
|
and per share data) |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
888,579 |
|
|
$ |
831,995 |
|
Middle East/North Africa/Asia |
|
|
562,056 |
|
|
|
585,768 |
|
Europe/West Africa/FSU |
|
|
453,759 |
|
|
|
368,981 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
426,673 |
|
|
|
467,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331,067 |
|
|
|
2,254,631 |
|
Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
108,432 |
|
|
|
116,748 |
|
Middle East/North Africa/Asia |
|
|
75,714 |
|
|
|
137,868 |
|
Europe/West Africa/FSU |
|
|
46,298 |
|
|
|
72,402 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
26,074 |
|
|
|
91,265 |
|
Research and Development |
|
|
(48,857 |
) |
|
|
(49,021 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(45,058 |
) |
|
|
(39,099 |
) |
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration |
|
|
(11,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exit and Restructuring |
|
|
(44,032 |
) |
|
|
(24,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,561 |
|
|
|
305,286 |
|
Interest Expense, Net |
|
|
(95,339 |
) |
|
|
(91,063 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar |
|
|
(63,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
(9,218 |
) |
|
|
(13,539 |
) |
Effective Tax Rate |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
Net Income (Loss) per Diluted Share |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|
249,705 |
|
|
|
201,394 |
|
Revenues
33
The following chart contains consolidated revenues by product line for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Well Construction |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Drilling Services |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Artificial Lift Systems |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Integrated Drilling |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Stimulation & Chemicals Services |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Drilling Tools |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Completion Systems |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Wireline |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Re-entry & Fishing |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Pipeline & Specialty Services |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues increased $76 million, or 3%, in the first quarter of 2010 as compared
to the first quarter of 2009. This increase in revenues was against a 6% increase in average
worldwide rig count. The majority of our year-over-year revenue growth was derived from North
America, where revenue increased $56 million, or 7% in the current quarter as compared to the same
quarter of the prior year. International revenues increased $20 million, or 1%, in the first
quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2009. Our Integrated Drilling product line was
the strongest contributor to the year-over-year increase.
Operating Income
Consolidated operating income decreased $198 million, or 65%, in the first quarter of 2010 as
compared to the first quarter of 2009. Our operating segments accounted for $162 million of the
decrease during the current quarter as compared to the same quarter of the prior year while
corporate expenditures were $6 million higher over the same period. The increase in corporate
expenses was primarily attributable to higher costs associated with business process optimization
initiatives that should be ongoing over the next two years and professional fees. We also augmented
our compliance infrastructure with increased staff and more rigorous policies, procedures and
training of our employees regarding compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws, trade sanction
laws and import/export laws. In addition, current quarter results include $44 million in exit and
restructuring charges, which is $19 million higher as compared to the first quarter of 2009.
Exit and restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2010 include (i) a $38
million charge related to our supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) that was frozen on
March 31, 2010, (ii) $9 million for severance and facility closure costs, primarily in the Western
Hemisphere, (iii) a $5 million benefit related to the reversal of prior cost accruals for our exit
from certain sanctioned countries and (iv) $2 million for legal and professional fees incurred in
connection with our on-going investigations.
Exit and restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2009 include (i) $13
million for legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going investigations and
(ii) $12 million for severance and facility closure costs.
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar
In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to devalue its currency
(Bolivar) and move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange rate moved from 2.15
to 2.60 for essential goods and 2.15 to 4.30 for non-essential goods and services. In connection
with this devaluation, we incurred a charge of $64 million ($40 million net of tax) for the
remeasurement of our net monetary assets denominated in Bolivars at the date of the devaluation.
Income Taxes
For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had a tax provision of $3 million on a pretax
loss of $61 million that includes curtailment expense on our SERP for which no related tax benefit
was recorded. Our tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2010 includes minimum tax in
Mexico and the tax impact of changes in our geographic earnings mix, both of which are partially
offset by a tax benefit related to the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar. Our effective tax rate
was a provision of 31.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
34
Segment Results
North America
North American revenues increased $56 million, or 7%, in the first quarter of 2010 as compared
to the first quarter of 2009 on a 7% increase in average North American rig count over the
comparable period. Revenues from all product lines increased, other than Drilling Tools, Fishing &
Re-Entry and Pipeline Services. The region benefited from higher activity in unconventional plays
in heavy oil and shales.
Operating income decreased $8 million, or 7%, in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the
first quarter of 2009. Operating margins were 12% in the current quarter and 14% in the same
quarter of the prior year.
Middle East/North Africa/Asia
Middle East/North Africa/Asia revenues decreased $24 million, or 4%, in the first quarter of
2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2009. This decrease was against a 2% increase in rig count
over the comparable period. Flooding in Australia, curtailment of drilling programs in India,
exceptionally cold weather in China and politically induced delays in Algeria were large drivers
behind the year-over-year decrease.
Operating income decreased $62 million, or 45%, during for the first quarter of 2010 compared
to the same quarter of the prior year. Operating margins were 14% for the first quarter of 2010
and 24% for the first quarter of 2009. The decline in margins year-over-year were primarily due to
inclement weather in certain areas, our continued mobilization efforts in the region and decreased
utilization.
Europe/West Africa/FSU
Revenues in our Europe/West Africa/FSU segment increased $85 million, or 23%, in the first
quarter of 2010 as compared to the same quarter of the prior year and outpaced the 13% increase in
average rig count over the comparable period. The year-over-year increase in revenue was driven by
our acquisition of the Oilfield Services Division (OFS) of TNK-BP in July 2009. Our Integrated
Drilling product line was the strongest contributor to the increase in revenue.
Operating income decreased $26 million, or 36%, during the first quarter of 2010 compared to
the same quarter of the prior year. Operating margins were 10% in the first quarter of 2010 and 20%
in the first quarter of 2009. The decline in operating income and margin was partially due to
pricing declines and changes in sales mix over the comparable period.
Latin America
Revenues in our Latin American segment decreased $41 million, or 9%, in the first quarter of
2010 as compared to the same quarter of the prior year against an average rig count increase of 2%
over the comparable period. The decrease in revenue is the result of reduced project activity in
Mexico and the deterioration in the Venezuelan market.
Operating income decreased $65 million, or 71%, for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
over the comparable period of the prior year. Operating margins were 6% in the first quarter of
2010 and 20% in the first quarter of 2009. The decline in operating income was due to the reduced
scale of project work in Mexico.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Our sources of liquidity include current cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated
from operations and committed availabilities under bank lines of credit. We also historically have
accessed banks for short-term loans from uncommitted borrowing arrangements and the capital markets
with debt, equity and convertible offerings.
35
Committed Borrowing Facilities
We maintain various revolving credit facilities with syndicates of banks that can be used for
a combination of borrowings, support for our commercial paper program and issuances of letters of
credit. At March 31, 2010, these facilities allow for an aggregate availability of $1.8 billion and
mature in May 2011. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings of these
facilities at March 31, 2010, was 1.0%.
Our committed borrowing facilities require us to maintain a debt-to-capitalization ratio of
less than 60% and contain other covenants and representations customary for an investment-grade
commercial credit. Our debt-to-capitalization ratio was 42.1% at March 31, 2010, which is in
compliance with these covenants.
The following is a recap of our availability under our committed borrowing facilities at March
31, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities |
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Amount drawn |
|
|
943 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Availability |
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper
We have a $1.5 billion commercial paper program under which we may from time to time issue
short-term unsecured notes. The commercial paper program is supported by our revolving credit
facilities. There was no commercial paper outstanding at March 31, 2010.
Cash Requirements
During 2010, we anticipate our cash requirements will include working capital needs, capital
expenditures and may include opportunistic business acquisitions. We anticipate funding these
requirements from cash generated from operations and availability under our committed borrowing
facilities.
Capital expenditures for 2010 are projected to be approximately $1.1 billion, net of proceeds
from tools lost down hole. The expenditures are expected to be used primarily to support the growth
of our businesses and operations. Capital expenditures during the three months ended March 31, 2010
were $209 million, net of proceeds from tools lost down hole.
Derivative Instruments
Interest Rate Swaps
We use interest rate swaps to help mitigate exposures related to interest rate movements.
Amounts received upon termination of the swaps accounted for as fair value hedges represent the
fair value of the agreements at the time of termination and are recorded as an adjustment to the
carrying value of the related debt. These amounts are being amortized as a reduction to interest
expense over the remaining term of the debt. We have no interest rate swaps outstanding at March
31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010 we had net unamortized gains of $67 million associated with interest
rate swap terminations.
Cash Flow Hedges
In 2008, we entered into interest rate derivative instruments to hedge projected exposures to
interest rates in anticipation of a debt offering. Those hedges were terminated at the time of the
issuance of the debt, and the loss on these hedges is being amortized from Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. As of March 31, 2010,
we had net unamortized losses of $13 million associated with our cash flow hedge terminations.
36
Other Derivative Instruments
As of March 31, 2010, we had several foreign currency forward and option contracts with
notional amounts aggregating to $620 million, which were entered into to hedge exposure to currency
fluctuations in various foreign currencies, including, but not limited to, the British pound
sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krone. The total estimated fair value of
these contracts at March 31, 2010 resulted in a net liability of approximately $8 million. These
derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts
are recorded each period in Other, Net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
A Swiss corporation named Weatherford International Ltd. is the ultimate parent (Weatherford
Switzerland) of the Weatherford group and guarantees the obligations of Weatherford International
Ltd. incorporated in Bermuda (Weatherford Bermuda) and Weatherford International, Inc.
incorporated in Delaware (Weatherford Delaware) noted below.
The following obligations of Weatherford Delaware were guaranteed by Weatherford Bermuda at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (i) the 6.625% Senior Notes, (ii) the 5.95% Senior Notes,
(iii) the 6.35% Senior Notes and (iv) the 6.80% Senior Notes.
The following obligations of Weatherford Bermuda were guaranteed by Weatherford Delaware at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: (i) the revolving credit facilities, (ii) the 4.95% Senior
Notes, (iii) the 5.50% Senior Notes, (iv) the 6.50% Senior Notes, (v) the 5.15% Senior Notes, (vi)
the 6.00% Senior Notes, (vii) the 7.00% Senior Notes, (viii) the 9.625% Senior Notes, (ix) the
9.875% Senior Notes and (x) issuances of notes under the commercial paper program.
Letters of Credit
We execute letters of credit and bid and performance bonds in the normal course of business.
While these obligations are not normally called, these obligations could be called by the
beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date should we breach certain contractual or
payment obligations. As of March 31, 2010, we had $351 million of letters of credit and bid and
performance bonds outstanding, consisting of $276 million outstanding under various uncommitted
credit facilities and $75 million letters of credit outstanding under our committed facilities. If
the beneficiaries called these letters of credit our available liquidity would be reduced by the
amount called.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 16 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our consolidated financial statements. We prepare these financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As such, we are required to make certain estimates,
judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods
presented. We base our estimates on historical experience, available information and various other
assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. On an on-going basis, we evaluate
our estimates; however, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. There have been no material changes or developments in our evaluation of the
accounting estimates and the underlying assumptions or methodologies that we believe to be Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates as disclosed in our Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Exposures
An investment in our registered shares involves various risks. When considering an investment
in our Company, you should consider carefully all of the risk factors described in our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading Item 1A. Risk Factors as well as the information
below and other information included and incorporated by reference in this report.
37
Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, as well as other filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), and our releases issued to the public contain various statements relating to future
results, including certain projections and business trends. We believe these statements constitute
Forward-Looking Statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words believe, project,
expect, anticipate, estimate, intend, strategy, plan, may, should, will, would,
will be, will continue, will likely result, and similar expressions, although not all
forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.
From time to time, we update the various factors we consider in making our forward-looking
statements and the assumptions we use in those statements. However, we undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking events or circumstances that may arise after the date
of this report. The following sets forth the various assumptions we use in our forward-looking
statements, as well as risks and uncertainties relating to those statements. Certain of the risks
and uncertainties may cause actual results to be materially different from projected results
contained in forward-looking statements in this report and in our other disclosures. These risks
and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
Global political, economic and market conditions could affect projected results. Our
operating results and the forward-looking information we provide are based on our current
assumptions about oil and natural gas supply and demand, oil and natural gas prices, rig
count and other market trends. Our assumptions on these matters are in turn based on
currently available information, which is subject to change. The oil and natural gas
industry is extremely volatile and subject to change based on political and economic
factors outside our control. Worldwide drilling activity, as measured by average worldwide
rig counts, increased in each year from 2002 to 2008. However, activity began declining in
the fourth quarter of 2008, particularly in North America. The weakened global economic
climate resulted in lower demand and lower prices for oil and natural gas, which reduced
drilling and production activity, which in turn resulted in lower than expected revenues
and income in 2009 and 2010 and may affect our future revenues and income. Worldwide
drilling activity and global demand for oil and natural gas may also be affected by changes
in governmental policies and debt loads, laws and regulations related to environmental or
energy security matters, including those addressing alternative energy sources and the
risks of global climate change. For 2011, worldwide demand may be significantly weaker than
we have assumed. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to recognize our expected revenues from current and future
contracts. Our customers, many of whom are national oil companies, often have significant
bargaining leverage over us and may elect to cancel or revoke contracts, not renew
contracts, modify the scope of contracts or delay contracts, in some cases preventing us
from realizing expected revenues and/or profits. Our projections assume that our customers
will honor the contracts we have been awarded and that those contracts and the business
that we believe is otherwise substantially firm will result in anticipated revenues in the
periods for which they are scheduled. |
|
|
|
|
Currency fluctuations could have a material adverse financial impact on our business. A
material change in currency rates in our markets, such as the devaluation of the Venezuelan
Bolivar experienced during the first quarter of 2010, could affect our future results as
well as affect the carrying values of our assets. World currencies have been subject to
much volatility. In addition, due to the volatility we may be unable to enter into foreign
currency contracts at a reasonable cost. As we are not able to predict changes in currency
valuations, our forward-looking statements assume no material impact from future changes in
currency exchange rates. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to manage our workforce could affect our projected results. In a climate of
decreasing demand, we are faced with managing our workforce levels to control costs without
impairing our ability to provide service to our customers. Conversely, in a climate of
increasing demand, we are faced with the challenge of hiring and maintaining a skilled
workforce at a reasonable cost. Our forward-looking statements assume we will be able to
do so. |
38
|
|
|
|
Increases in the prices and availability of our raw materials could affect our results
of operations. We use large amounts of raw materials for manufacturing our products and
some of our fixed assets. The price of these raw materials has a significant impact on our
cost of producing products for sale or producing fixed assets used in our business. We
have assumed that the prices of our raw materials will remain within a manageable range and
will be readily available. If we are unable to obtain necessary raw materials or if we are
unable to minimize the impact of increased raw material costs or to realize the benefit of
cost decreases in a timely fashion through our supply chain initiatives or pricing, our
margins and results of operations could be adversely affected. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to manage our supply chain and business processes could affect our projected
results. We have undertaken efforts to improve our supply chain, invoicing and collection
processes and procedures. These undertakings include costs, which we expect will result in
long-term benefits of our business processes. Our forward-looking statements assume we will
realize the benefits of these efforts. |
|
|
|
|
Our long-term growth depends upon technological innovation and commercialization. Our
ability to deliver our long-term growth strategy depends in part on the commercialization
of new technology. A central aspect of our growth strategy is to improve our products and
services through innovation, to obtain technologically advanced products through internal
research and development and/or acquisitions, to protect proprietary technology from
unauthorized use and to expand the markets for new technology by leveraging our worldwide
infrastructure. The key to our success will be our ability to commercialize the technology
that we have acquired and demonstrate the enhanced value our technology brings to our
customers operations. Our major technological advances include, but are not limited to,
those related to controlled pressure drilling and testing systems, expandable solid
tubulars, expandable sand screens and intelligent well completion. Our forward-looking
statements have assumed successful commercialization of, and above-average growth from,
these new products and services, as well as legal protection of our intellectual property
rights. |
39
|
|
|
Nonrealization of expected benefits from our redomestication could affect our projected
results. We operate through our various subsidiaries in numerous countries throughout the
world including the United States. During the first quarter of 2009, we completed a
transaction in which our former parent Bermuda company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock corporation, and holders of common
shares of the Bermuda company received one
registered share of the Swiss company in
exchange for each common share that they held. Consequently, we are or may become subject
to changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations or the interpretation or enforcement
thereof in the U.S., Bermuda, Switzerland or any other jurisdictions in which we or any of
our subsidiaries operates or is resident. Our income tax expense is based upon our
interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense
was incurred. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing authorities do not
agree with our assessment of the effects of such laws, treaties and regulations, this could
have a material adverse effect on us including the imposition of a higher effective tax
rate on our worldwide earnings or a reclassification of the tax impact of our significant
corporate restructuring transactions. In addition, our realization of expected tax
benefits is based upon the assumption that we take successful planning steps and that we
maintain and execute adequate processes to support our planning activities. If we fail to
do so, we may not achieve the expected benefits. |
|
|
|
|
Nonrealization of expected benefits from our acquisitions or business dispositions could
affect our projected results. We expect to gain certain business, financial and strategic
advantages as a result of business acquisitions we undertake, including synergies and
operating efficiencies. Our forward-looking statements assume that we will successfully
integrate our business acquisitions and realize the benefits of those acquisitions.
Further, we may from time to time undertake to dispose of businesses or capital assets that
are no longer core to our long-term growth strategy and the disposition of which may
improve our capital structure. Our forward-looking statements assume that if we decide to
dispose of a business or asset we will find a buyer willing to pay a price we deem
favorable to Weatherford and that we will successfully dispose of the business or asset.
Our inability to complete dispositions timely and at attractive prices may impair our
ability to improve our capital structure as rapidly as our forward-looking statements may
indicate. |
|
|
|
|
The downturn in our industry could affect the carrying value of our goodwill. As of
December 31, 2010, we had approximately $4.2 billion of goodwill. Our estimates of the
value of our goodwill could be reduced in the future as a result of various factors,
including market factors, some of which are beyond our control. Our forward-looking
statements do not assume any future goodwill impairment. Any reduction in the fair value
of our businesses may result in an impairment charge and therefore adversely affect our
results. |
|
|
|
|
Adverse weather conditions in certain regions could adversely affect our operations. In
the summers of 2005 and 2008, the Gulf of Mexico suffered several significant hurricanes.
These hurricanes and associated hurricane threats reduced the number of days on which we
and our customers could operate, which resulted in lower revenues than we otherwise would
have achieved. In parts of 2006, and particularly in the second quarters of 2007 and 2008, climatic conditions in Canada were not
as favorable to drilling as we anticipated, which limited our potential results in that
region. Similarly, unfavorable weather in Russia, China, Mexico, Australia and in the North
Sea, as well as exceedingly cold winters in other areas of the world, could reduce our
operations and revenues from this area during the relevant period. Our forward-looking
statements assume weather patterns in our primary areas of operations will be conducive to
our operations. |
40
|
|
|
U.S. Government and internal investigations could affect our results of
operations. We are currently involved in government and internal investigations involving
various of our operations. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to
resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact
of the ultimate resolution of these investigations, financial or otherwise. The
governmental agencies involved in these investigations have a broad range of civil and
criminal penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for
violations of trade sanction laws, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other federal
statutes including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties
and modifications to business practices and compliance programs. In recent years, these
agencies and authorities have entered into agreements with, and obtained a range of
penalties against, several public corporations and individuals in similar investigations,
under which civil and criminal penalties were imposed, including in some cases fines and
other penalties and sanctions in the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. These
agencies likely will seek to impose penalties of some amount against us for past conduct,
but the ultimate amount of any penalties we may pay currently cannot be reasonably
estimated. Under trade sanction laws, the U.S. Department of Justice may also seek to
impose modifications to business practices,
including immediate cessation of
all business activities in specific countries or other
limitations that decrease
our business, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance
costs. Any injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, sanctions or imposed
modifications to business practices resulting from these investigations could adversely
affect our results of operations. Through December 31, 2010, we have incurred $49 million for
costs in connection with our exit from certain sanctioned countries and incurred $113
million for legal and professional fees in connection with complying with and conducting
these on-going investigations. This amount excludes the costs we have incurred to augment
and improve our compliance function. We may have additional charges related to these
matters in future periods, which costs may include labor claims, contractual claims,
penalties assessed by customers, and costs, fines, taxes and penalties assessed by the
local governments, but we cannot quantify those charges or be certain of the timing of
them. |
|
|
|
|
Failure in the future to ensure ongoing compliance with certain laws could affect our
results of operations. In 2009, we substantially augmented our compliance infrastructure
with increased staff and more rigorous policies, procedures and training of our employees
regarding compliance with applicable anti-corruption laws, trade sanctions laws and
import/export laws. As part of this effort, we now undertake audits of our compliance
performance in various countries. Our forward-looking statements assume that our
compliance efforts will be successful and that we will comply with our internal policies
and applicable laws regarding these issues. Our failure to do so could result in
additional enforcement action in the future, the results of which could be material and
adverse to us. |
41
|
|
|
Political disturbances, war, or terrorist attacks and changes in global trade policies
could adversely impact our operations. We operate in over 100 countries, and as
such are at risk of various types of political activities, including acts of insurrections,
war, terrorism, nationalization of assets and changes in trade policies. We have assumed
there will be no material political disturbances or terrorist attacks and there will be no
material changes in global trade policies that affect our business. In early 2011, our
operations in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya were disrupted by political revolutions and
uprisings in these countries. Political disturbances in these countries and elsewhere in
the Middle East and North Africa regions, including to a lesser extent Yemen and Bahrain,
are ongoing as of the end of February, 2011, and our operations in Libya have not resumed.
During 2010, these five countries accounted for approximately 3% of our global revenue. We
have taken steps to secure our personnel and assets in affected areas and to resume or
continue operations where it is safe for us to do so, and our forward-looking statements
assume we will do so successfully. In Libya, we have evacuated all of our non-Libyan
employees and their families. At December 31, 2010, we had in Libya inventory, property,
plant and equipment (net) with a carrying value of approximately $141 million, as well as cash, accounts receivable and
prepaid expenses of approximately $76 million. In cases where we must evacuate personnel, it
may be difficult, if not impossible, for us to safeguard and recover our operating assets,
and our ability to do so will depend on the local turn of events. In these areas we also may
not be able to perform the work we are contracted to perform, which could lead to forfeiture
of performance bonds. We currently have outstanding approximately $19 million of performance
bonds related to contracts in Libya. Our forward-looking statements assume that we will not
incur a substantial loss with respect to our assets or under performance bonds located in or
related to affected areas. We have assumed that cessation of business activities in parts of
the Middle East and North Africa regions due to political turmoil will be short-lived, that
the negative impact on our business will not be material, and that the region will not
experience further disruptive political revolution in the near term. However, if political
violence were to curtail our activities in other countries in the region from which we
derive greater business, such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Algeria, and particularly if
political activities were to result in prolonged violence or civil war, we may fail to
achieve the results reflected in our forward-looking statements. |
|
|
|
|
The material weakness in accounting for income taxes could have an adverse effect
on our share price. If we are unable to effectively remediate this material weakness in a
timely manner, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our
financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our share price and could
subject us to additional potentially costly shareholder litigation or government inquiries.
Our forward looking-statements assume we will be able to remediate the material weakness
in a timely manner and will maintain an effective internal control environment in the
future. |
|
|
|
|
Recent turmoil in the credit markets may reduce our access to capital or reduce the
availability of financial risk-mitigation tools. The worldwide credit markets experienced
turmoil and uncertainty from mid-2008 through most of 2009, and certain markets remained
challenging in parts of 2010. Our forward-looking statements assume that the financial
institutions that have committed to extend us credit will honor their commitments under our
credit facilities. If one or more of those institutions becomes unwilling or unable to
honor its commitments, our access to liquidity could be impaired and our cost of capital to
fund growth could increase. We use interest-rate and foreign-exchange swap transactions
with financial institutions to mitigate certain interest-rate and foreign-exchange risks
associated with our capital structure and our business. Our forward-looking statements
assume that those tools will continue to be available to us at prices we deem reasonable.
However, the failure of any counter party to honor a swap agreement could reduce the
availability of these financial risk-mitigation tools or could result in the loss of
expected financial benefits. |
Finally, our future results will depend upon
various other risks and uncertainties, including,
but not limited to, those detailed in our other filings with the SEC under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For additional information
regarding risks and uncertainties, see our other filings with the SEC. Our annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 are made
available free of charge on our internet web site www.weatherford.com as soon as reasonably
practicable after we have electronically filed the material with, or furnished it to, the SEC.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge, on our website (www.weatherford.com) our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish them
to the SEC.
42
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are currently exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency and changes in
interest rates. From time to time, we may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions
to manage or reduce our market risk, but we do not enter into derivative transactions for
speculative purposes. A discussion of our market risk exposure in these financial instruments
follows.
43
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
We operate in virtually every oil and natural gas exploration and production region in the
world. In some parts of the world, such as the Middle East and Southeast Asia, the currency of our
primary economic environment is the U.S. dollar. We use this as our functional currency. In other
parts of the world, we conduct our business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and the
functional currency is the applicable local currency. In those countries in which we operate in the
local currency, the effects of foreign currency fluctuations are largely mitigated because local
expenses of such foreign operations are also generally denominated in the same currency.
In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to devalue its currency
(Bolivar) and move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange rate moved from 2.15
to 2.60 for essential goods and 2.15 to 4.30 for non-essential goods and services. Our Venezuelan
entities maintain the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. In connection with this
devaluation, we incurred a charge of $64 million ($40 million net of tax) for the remeasurement of
our net monetary assets denominated in Bolivars at the date of the devaluation.
Assets and liabilities of entities for which the functional currency is the local currency are
translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date,
resulting in translation adjustments that are reflected in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
in the shareholders equity section on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. A portion of our
net assets are impacted by changes in foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. We
recorded a $67 million adjustment to reduce our equity account for the three months ended March 31,
2010 to reflect the net impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against various foreign
currencies.
As of March 31, 2010, we had several foreign currency forward and option contracts with
notional amounts aggregating to $620 million, which were entered into to hedge exposure to currency
fluctuations in various foreign currencies, including, but not limited to, the British pound
sterling, the Canadian dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krone. The total estimated fair value of
these contracts at March 31, 2010 resulted in a net liability of approximately $8 million. These
derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the changes in fair value of the contracts
are recorded each period in current earnings.
We have cross-currency swaps between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar to hedge certain
exposures to the Canadian dollar. At March 31, 2010, we had notional amounts outstanding of $335
million. The total estimated fair value of these contracts at March 31, 2010 resulted in a
liability of $33 million. These derivative instruments were not designated as hedges and the
changes in fair value of the contracts are recorded each period in current earnings.
Interest Rates
We are subject to interest rate risk on our long-term fixed-interest rate debt and
variable-interest rate borrowings. Variable rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates
periodically, exposes us to short-term changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt, where the
interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes us to changes in market interest
rates reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance
maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate. All other things being equal, the fair value of our
fixed rate debt will increase or decrease as interest rates change.
Our long-term borrowings that were outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 subject
to interest rate risk consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
|
(In millions) |
6.625% Senior Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
5.95% Senior Notes due 2012 |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
5.15% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
4.95% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
5.50% Senior Notes due 2016 |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
6.35% Senior Notes due 2017 |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
6.00% Senior Notes due 2018 |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
9.625% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
6.50% Senior Notes due 2036 |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
6.80% Senior Notes due 2037 |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
7.00% Senior Notes due 2038 |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
9.875% Senior Notes due 2039 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
We have various other long-term debt instruments of $16 million at March 31, 2010, but believe
the impact of changes in interest rates in the near term will not be material to these instruments.
The carrying value of our short-term borrowings of $974 million at March 31, 2010 approximates
their fair value.
44
As it relates to our variable rate debt, if market interest rates average 1% more for the
remainder of 2010 than the rates as of March 31, 2010, interest expense for the remainder of 2010
would increase by $7 million. This amount was determined by calculating the effect of the
hypothetical interest rate on our variable rate debt. This sensitivity analysis assumes there are
no changes in our financial structure.
Interest Rate Swaps and Derivatives
We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating
rates and may employ interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that goal. The major risks from
interest rate derivatives include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such
instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest
rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. The counterparties to
our interest rate swaps are multinational commercial banks. In light of events in the global credit
markets and the potential impact of these events on the liquidity of the banking industry, we
continue to monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties.
We use interest rate swaps to take advantage of available short-term interest rates. Amounts
received upon termination of the swaps represent the fair value of the agreements at the time of
termination and are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt. These
amounts are being amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt.
We have no interest rate swaps outstanding at March 31, 2010. As of March, 31 2010 we had net
unamortized gains of $67 million, associated with interest rate swap terminations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the time of our original Form 10-Q filing, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief
Financial Officer (CFO) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of March 31, 2010. Subsequent to that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, has
re-evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act))
include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and
including that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO
and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this re-evaluation and
in connection therewith, the restatement of previously issued financial statements described below
and the identification of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting of
income taxes described below, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2010.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control
over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlAn Integrated Framework
(September 1992).
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010. In connection with this assessment, management identified a material weakness
in our internal controls over financial reporting for income taxes. Our processes, procedures and
controls related to financial reporting were not effective to ensure that amounts related to
current taxes payable, certain deferred tax assets and liabilities, reserves for uncertain tax
positions, the current and deferred income tax expense and related footnote disclosures were
accurate. Specifically, our processes and procedures were not designed to provide for adequate and
timely identification and review of various income tax calculations, reconciliations and related
supporting documentation required to apply our accounting policies for income taxes in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. This material weakness resulted in the restatement for material errors in the
income tax accounts in 2008 and 2009 consolidated financial statements and our condensed
consolidated financial statements for the each of the quarters within 2009 and 2010.
The principal factors contributing to the material weakness were: 1) inadequate staffing and
technical expertise within the company related to taxes, 2) ineffective review and approval
practices relating to taxes, 3) inadequate processes to effectively reconcile income tax accounts
and 4) inadequate controls over the preparation of the quarterly tax provision.
45
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management, including the CEO and CFO, identified no change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
Remediation Plan
In an effort to remediate the material weakness, we plan to undertake the following:
|
|
|
Redesign the tax accounting processes to improve the flow of information to provide for
more timely generation of account reconciliations and supporting documentation that will
facilitate supervision and review of the resulting account analyses; |
|
|
|
|
Hire experienced personnel within the tax and financial reporting process to ensure
effective preparation and review of account reconciliations and analyses and enhance
training programs for local finance and corporate personnel; |
|
|
|
|
Increase the frequency of the preparation of a formal tax basis balance sheet and
reconciliations of the all tax accounts to enable more timely detection of potential
errors; and |
|
|
|
|
Implement a quarterly process to highlight significant matters requiring the attention
of both local finance and corporate personnel. |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common shares involves
various risks. When considering an investment in
our company, you should consider carefully all of the risk factors described below, the matters
discussed within our Forward-Looking Statements, as well as other information included and
incorporated by reference in this report.
Physical
dangers are inherent in our operations and may expose us to significant potential
losses. Personnel and property may be harmed during the process of drilling for oil and natural
gas.
Drilling for and producing hydrocarbons, and
the associated products and services that we
provide, include inherent dangers that may lead to property damage, personal injury, death or the
discharge of hazardous materials into the environment. Many of these events are outside our
control. Typically, we provide products and services at a well site where our personnel and
equipment are located together with personnel and equipment of our customer and third parties, such
as other service providers. At many sites, we depend on other companies and personnel to conduct
drilling operations in accordance with appropriate safety standards. From time to time, personnel
are injured or equipment or property is damaged or destroyed as a result of industrial accidents,
failed equipment, faulty products or services, failure of safety measures, uncontained formation
pressures, or other dangers inherent in drilling for oil and natural gas. Any of these events can
be the result of human error. With increasing frequency, our products and services are deployed on
more challenging prospects both onshore and offshore, where the occurrence of the types of events
mentioned above can have an even more catastrophic impact on people, equipment and the environment.
Such events may expose us to significant potential losses.
We may not be fully indemnified against
financial losses in all circumstances where damage to
or loss of property, personal injury, death or environmental harm occur.
As is customary in our industry, our contracts
typically provide that our customers indemnify
us for claims arising from the injury or death of their employees, the loss or damage of their
equipment, damage to the reservoir and pollution emanating from the customers equipment or from
the reservoir (including uncontained oil flow from a reservoir). Conversely, we typically indemnify
our customers for claims arising from the injury or death of our employees, the loss or damage of
our equipment, or pollution emanating from our equipment. Our contracts typically provide that our
customer will indemnify us for claims arising from catastrophic events, such as a well blowout,
fire or explosion.
Our indemnification arrangements may not
protect us in every case. For example, from time to
time we may enter into contracts with less favorable indemnities or perform work without a contract
that protects us; our indemnity arrangements may be held unenforceable in some courts and
jurisdictions; or we may be subject to other claims brought by third parties or government
agencies. Furthermore, the parties from which we seek indemnity may not be solvent, may become
bankrupt, may lack resources or insurance to honor their indemnities, or may not otherwise be able
to satisfy their indemnity obligations to us. The lack of enforceable indemnification could expose
us to significant potential losses.
Further, our assets generally are not insured
against loss from political violence such as
war, terrorism or civil commotion. If any of our assets are damaged or destroyed as a result of an
uninsured cause, we would recognize a loss of those assets.
46
Our business may be exposed to
uninsured claims, and litigation might result in significant
potential losses.
In the ordinary course of business, we
become the subject of various claims and litigation.
For example, we have been named in a number of lawsuits because, along with other oilfield service
companies, we provided products and services on the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico. We
maintain liability insurance, which includes insurance against damage to people, equipment and the
environment, up to maximum limits of $600 million, and subject to self-insured retentions and
deductibles of $2 million, per occurrence.
Our insurance policies are subject to
exclusions, limitations, and other conditions and may
not apply in all cases, for example where willful wrongdoing on our part is alleged. It is
possible an unexpected judgment could be rendered against us in cases in which we could be
uninsured and beyond the amounts we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring, and in some
cases those potential losses could be material.
Our insurance may not be sufficient to cover
any particular loss, or our insurance may not
cover all losses. For example, although we maintain product liability insurance, this type of
insurance is limited in coverage and it is possible an adverse claim could arise in excess of our
coverage. Finally, insurance rates have in the past been subject to wide fluctuation. In response
to the recent catastrophic accident in the Gulf of Mexico, insurance rates are volatile and
increasing, and some forms of insurance may become entirely unavailable in the future or
unavailable on terms that we or our customers believe are economically acceptable. Reductions in
coverage, changes in the insurance markets and accidents affecting our industry may result in
further increases in our cost and higher deductibles and retentions in future years and may also
result in reduced activity levels in certain markets. Any of these events would have an adverse
impact on our financial performance.
Our operations are subject to
environmental and other laws and regulations that may expose us
to significant liabilities and could reduce our business opportunities and revenues.
We are subject to various federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the energy
industry in general and the environment in particular. An environmental claim could arise with
respect to one or more of our current businesses, products or services, or a business or property
that one of our predecessors owned or used, and such claims could involve material expenditures.
Generally, environmental laws have in recent years become more stringent and have sought to impose
greater liability on a larger number of potentially responsible parties. The scope of regulation
of our industry and our products and services may increase further following recent events in the
Gulf of Mexico, including possible increases in liabilities or funding requirements imposed by
governmental agencies. In early 2010, a moratorium was issued on new deepwater projects in the
Gulf of Mexico. Although that moratorium was recently lifted, we cannot anticipate when and to
what extent drilling activity in the deepwater Gulf will resume. We also cannot ensure that our
future business in the deepwater Gulf, if any, will be profitable in light of new regulations that
may be promulgated and in light of the current risk environment and insurance markets. Further,
additional regulations on deepwater drilling elsewhere in the world could be imposed as a result of
the Deepwater Horizon incident, and those regulations could limit our business where they are
imposed. In addition, members of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
are reviewing more stringent regulation of hydraulic fracturing, a technology which is used in one
of our business segments, and regulators are investigating whether any chemicals used in the
fracturing process might adversely affect groundwater. A significant portion of North American
service activity today is directed at prospects that require hydraulic fracturing in order to
produce hydrocarbons. Additional regulation could increase the costs of conducting our business
and could materially reduce our business opportunities and revenues if our customers decrease their
levels of activity in response to such regulation.
We have significant operations that
would be adversely impacted in the event of war, political
disruption, civil disturbance, economic and legal sanctions or changes in global trade policies.
Like most multinational oilfield service
companies, we have operations in certain
international areas, including parts of the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, the Asia Pacific
region and the FSU, that are subject to risks of war, political disruption, civil disturbance,
economic and legal sanctions (such as restrictions against countries that the U.S. government may
deem to sponsor terrorism) and changes in global trade policies. Our operations may be restricted
or prohibited in any country in which the foregoing risks occur.
In particular, the occurrence of any of these
risks could result in the following events,
which in turn, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations:
|
|
|
disruption of oil and natural gas exploration and production activities; |
|
|
|
|
restriction of the movement and exchange of funds; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to collect receivables; |
|
|
|
|
loss of assets in affected jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
|
enactment of additional or stricter U.S. government or international sanctions; and |
|
|
|
|
limitation of our access to markets for periods of time. |
47
In early 2011, our operations in Tunisia,
Egypt and Libya have been disrupted by the political
revolutions and uprisings in these countries. Political disturbances in these countries and
elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa regions, including to a lesser extent Yemen and
Bahrain, are ongoing as of the end of February, 2011, and our operations in Libya have not resumed.
During 2010, these five countries accounted for approximately 3% of our global revenue. In Libya,
we have evacuated all of our non-Libyan employees and their families.
At December 31, 2010, we had in
Libya inventory, property, plant and equipment (net) with a
carrying value of approximately $141 million, as well as cash, accounts receivable and prepaid
expenses of approximately $76 million. In cases where we must evacuate personnel, it may be
difficult, if not impossible, for us to safeguard and recover our operating assets, and our ability
to do so will depend on the local turn of events. In these areas we also may not be able to perform
the work we are contracted to perform, which could lead to forfeiture of performance bonds. We
currently have outstanding approximately $19 million of performance bonds related to contracts in
Libya. We could suffer material losses with respect to these assets.
If political violence were to curtail our
activities in other countries in the region from
which we derive greater business, such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Algeria, and particularly if
political activities were to result in prolonged violence or
civil war, these political
activities could have a material adverse effect on our business in the region.
We are involved in several governmental
and internal investigations, which are costly to
conduct, have resulted in a loss of revenue and may result in substantial financial penalties.
We are currently involved in government and
internal investigations involving
various areas of our operations.
Until 2003, we participated in the United
Nations oil-for-food program governing sales of
goods and services into Iraq. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC have undertaken
investigations of our participation in the oil-for-food program and have subpoenaed certain
documents in connection with these investigations. We have cooperated fully with these
investigations. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit committee, to investigate
this matter. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but
we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the
investigations, financial or otherwise.
The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau
of Industry & Security, Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC), DOJ and SEC have undertaken investigations of allegations of improper sales of
products and services by the Company and its subsidiaries in certain sanctioned countries. We have
cooperated fully with this investigation. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit
committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with these agencies. We have begun
negotiations with the government agencies to resolve these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate
the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate resolution of the investigation, financial
or otherwise.
In light of this investigation and of U.S. and
foreign policy environment and the inherent
uncertainties surrounding these countries, we decided in September 2007 to direct our foreign
subsidiaries to discontinue doing business in countries that are subject to comprehensive U.S.
economic and trade sanctions, specifically Cuba, Iran, and Sudan, as well as Syria. Effective
September 2007, we ceased entering into any new contracts in these countries and began an orderly
discontinuation and winding down of our existing business in these sanctioned countries. Effective
March 31, 2008, we substantially completed our winding down of business in these countries. We can
complete the withdrawal process only pursuant to licenses issued by OFAC. Our remaining activities
in Iran, Sudan and Syria include ongoing withdrawal activities such as attempts to collect accounts
receivable, attempts to settle tax liabilities or legal claims and attempts to recover or liquidate
assets, including equipment and funds. Certain of our subsidiaries continue to conduct business in
countries such as Myanmar that are subject to more limited U.S. trading sanctions.
The DOJ and SEC are investigating our
compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(FCPA) and other laws worldwide. We have retained legal counsel, reporting to our audit
committee, to investigate these matters and to cooperate fully with the DOJ and SEC. As part of
our investigations, we have uncovered potential violations of U.S. law in connection with
activities in West Africa. We have begun negotiations with the government agencies to resolve
these matters, but we cannot yet anticipate the timing, outcome or possible impact of the ultimate
resolution of the investigations, financial or otherwise.
48
The DOJ, SEC and other agencies and
authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal
penalties they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of trade
sanctions laws, the FCPA and other federal statutes including, but not limited to, injunctive
relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and compliance
programs. In recent years, these agencies and authorities have entered into agreements with, and
obtained a range of penalties against, several public corporations and individuals in similar
investigations, under which civil and criminal penalties were imposed, including in some cases
fines and other penalties and sanctions in the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. These
agencies are seeking to impose penalties against us for past conduct, but the ultimate amount of
any penalties we may pay currently cannot be reasonably estimated. Under trade sanctions laws, the
DOJ may also seek to impose modifications to business practices, including immediate cessation of
all business activities in specific countries or other limitations that decrease our business, and
modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs. Any injunctive relief,
disgorgement, fines, penalties, sanctions or imposed modifications to business practices resulting
from these investigations could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, our
historical activities in sanctioned countries, such as Sudan and Iran, could result in certain
investors, such as government sponsored pension funds, divesting or not investing in our registered
shares. Based on available information, we cannot predict what, if any, actions the DOJ, SEC or
other authorities will take in our situation or the effect any such actions will have on our
consolidated financial position or results of operations. To the extent we violated trade sanctions
laws, the FCPA, or other laws or regulations, fines and other penalties may be imposed. Because
these matters are now pending before the indicated agencies, there can be no assurance that actual
fines or penalties, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Through December 31, 2010, we have incurred $49 million
for costs in connection with our exit from sanctioned
countries and incurred $113 million for legal and professional fees in connection with complying
with and conducting these on-going investigations.
Our significant operations in foreign
countries expose us to currency fluctuation risks or
devaluation.
A portion of our net assets are located
outside the U.S. and are carried on our books in local
currencies. Changes in those currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar result in translation
adjustments, which are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income in the shareholders
equity section in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize remeasurement and transactional
gains and losses on currencies in our Consolidated Statements of Income, which may adversely impact
our results of operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts and other derivative
instruments as an effort to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations; however, there can be no
assurance that these hedging activities will be effective in reducing or eliminating foreign
currency risks.
In certain foreign countries, a component of
our cost structure is denominated in a different
currency than our revenues. In those cases, currency fluctuations could adversely impact our
operating margins.
In January 2010, the Venezuelan
government announced its intention to devalue its currency and
move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange moved from 2.15 to 2.60 for essential
goods and 4.30 for non-essential goods and services. In connection with this devaluation, we
incurred a charge of $64 million for the remeasurement of our net monetary assets denominated in
Venezuelan bolivars at the date of the devaluation, which was not tax deductible. We also recorded
a $24 million tax benefit for local Venezuelan income tax purposes related to our net U.S.
dollar-denominated monetary liability position in the country. We currently utilize the 4.30
Venezuelan bolivar to U.S. dollar exchange rate. At December 31, 2010, we had a net monetary asset
position denominated in Venezuelan bolivars of approximately $56 million comprised primarily of
cash and accounts receivable. We are continuing to explore opportunities to reduce this exposure
but should another devaluation occur in the future, we may be required to take further charges
related to the remeasurement of our net monetary asset position. For example, if the Venezuela
bolivar devalued by an additional 10% in the future, we would record a devaluation charge of
approximately $6 million. Effective January 1, 2011, the Venezuelan government again modified the
fixed rate of exchange, eliminating the two tier structure and establishing 4.30 as the official
exchange rate for all goods and services. This modification will not have a material impact to our
financial position or results of operations.
As a result of discussions with a customer and
the economic environment in Venezuela, we
reviewed how the dual exchange rate might affect amounts we receive for our U.S. dollar-denominated
receivables in Venezuela. We believe our contracts are legally enforceable and our customers
continue to accept our invoices. However, based on the current political and economic environment
in Venezuela, we believe a loss is probable. Accordingly, we recorded a reserve of $32 million
against this exposure in the fourth quarter of 2010.
49
Customer credit risks could result in
losses.
The concentration of our customers in the
energy industry may impact our overall exposure to
credit risk as customers may be similarly affected by prolonged changes in economic and industry
conditions. Those countries that rely heavily upon income from hydrocarbon exports will be hit
particularly hard given the drop in oil prices. Further, laws in some jurisdictions in which we
operate could make collection difficult or time consuming. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of
our customers and do not generally require collateral in support of our trade receivables. While we
maintain reserves for potential credit losses, we cannot assure such reserves will be sufficient to
meet write-offs of uncollectible receivables or that our losses from such receivables will be
consistent with our expectations.
Any capital financing that may be
necessary to fund growth may not be available to us at
economic rates.
Turmoil in the credit markets and the potential
impact on liquidity of major financial
institutions may have an adverse effect on our ability to fund growth opportunities through
borrowings, under either existing or newly created instruments in the public or private markets on
terms we believe to be reasonable.
50
A terrorist attack could have a material
and adverse effect on our business.
We operate in many dangerous countries,
such as Iraq, in which acts of terrorism or political
violence are a substantial and frequent risk. Such acts could result in kidnappings or the loss of
life of our employees or contractors, a loss of equipment, which may or may not be insurable in all
cases, or a cessation of business in an affected area. We cannot be certain that our security
efforts will in all cases be sufficient to deter or prevent acts of political violence or terrorist
strikes against us or our customers operations.
We have identified a material weakness
in accounting for income taxes in our internal control
over financial reporting, which, if not remedied effectively, could have an adverse effect
on our share price.
Management, through documentation, testing
and assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting pursuant to the rules promulgated by the SEC under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 308 of Regulation S-K, has concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting had a material weakness in accounting for income taxes as of December 31,
2010. If we are unable to effectively remediate this
material weakness in a timely manner, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and
completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our share
price.
In future periods, if the process required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act reveals
further material weaknesses or significant deficiencies, the correction of any such material
weakness or significant deficiency could require additional remedial measures including additional
personnel which could be costly and time-consuming. If a material weakness exists as of a future
period year-end (including a material weakness identified prior to year-end for which there is an
insufficient period of time to evaluate and confirm the effectiveness of the corrections or related
new procedures), our management will be unable to report favorably as of such future period
year-end to the effectiveness of our control over financial reporting. If we are unable to assert
that our internal control over financial reporting is effective in any future period, or if we
continue to experience material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting for
accounting for income taxes, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of
our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our share price and potentially
subject us to additional and potentially costly litigation and governmental
inquiries/investigations In March 2011, shareholders filed suit relating to the matters described
above. In addition, the SEC is investigating the circumstances surrounding the material weakness and related restatement
of historical financial statements. We are cooperating with the investigation.
Changes in tax laws could adversely
impact our results.
On June 26, 2002, the shareholders
and Board of Directors of Weatherford International, Inc.
(Weatherford Delaware) approved our corporate reorganization, and Weatherford International Ltd.
(Weatherford Bermuda), a
newly formed Bermuda company, became the parent holding company of
Weatherford International,
Inc. During the first quarter of 2009, we completed a transaction in which Weatherford Bermuda
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock company
(Weatherford Switzerland), and holders of our common shares received one registered share of
Weatherford Switzerland for each common share of Weatherford Bermuda that they held. We refer to
this transaction as the redomestication. The realization of the tax benefit of this
reorganization could be impacted by changes in tax laws, tax treaties or tax regulations or the
interpretation or enforcement thereof or differing interpretation or enforcement of applicable law
by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing jurisdictions. The inability to realize this
benefit could have a material impact on our financial statements.
51
The anticipated benefits of moving our
principal executive offices to Switzerland may not be
realized, and difficulties in connection with moving our principal executive offices could have an
adverse effect on us.
In connection with the redomestication, we
relocated our principal executive offices from
Houston, Texas to Geneva, Switzerland. Most of our executive officers, including our Chief
Executive Officer, and other key decision makers have relocated or will relocate to Switzerland. We
may face significant challenges in relocating our executive offices to a different country,
including difficulties in retaining and attracting officers, key personnel and other employees and
challenges in maintaining our executive offices in a country different from the country where other
employees, including corporate support staff, are located. Employees may be uncertain about their
future roles within our organization as a result of the redomestication. Management may also be
required to devote substantial time to the redomestication and related matters, which could
otherwise be devoted to focusing on ongoing business operations and other initiatives and
opportunities. In addition, we may not realize the benefits we anticipate from the redomestication,
including the benefit of moving to a location that is more centrally located within our area of
worldwide operations. Any such difficulties could have an adverse effect on our business, results
of operations or financial condition.
The rights of our shareholders are
governed by Swiss law and documents following the
redomestication.
Following the redomestication, the rights of
our shareholders are governed by Swiss law and
Weatherford Switzerlands articles of association and organizational regulations. The rights of
shareholders under Swiss law differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in
other jurisdictions. For example, directors of Weatherford Switzerland may be removed by
shareholders with or without cause, but such removal requires the vote of shareholders holding at
least 66 2/3% of the voting rights and the absolute majority of the par value of the registered
shares represented at the meeting as well as a quorum of at least two-thirds of the registered
shares recorded in the share register.
We hold shareholder meetings in
Switzerland, and our required quorum for those meetings is
lower.
We hold shareholders meetings in
Switzerland, which may make attendance in person more
difficult for some investors. For shareholders meetings for Weatherford-Switzerland for the
transaction of any business other than removal of a director or certain other specified
resolutions, a quorum comprises at least one-third of the registered shares recorded in the share
register and entitled to vote (and at least two-thirds of the registered shares recorded in the
share register and entitled to vote for the removal of directors and certain other specified
resolutions).
52
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On the dates listed below, in connection with acquisitions, we sold registered shares to the
shareholders of the acquired company as consideration for the shares of the acquired company. The
sale of our registered shares was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933
pursuant to Section 4(2) of that act and pursuant to Regulation D and Regulation S promulgated
under that act as a non-public sale to accredited investors and/or to non-U.S. persons outside the
United States.
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
No. of Shares |
February 2, 2010 |
|
|
214,585 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
596,121 |
|
In December 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program under which up to
$1 billion of our outstanding common shares (now registered shares) could be purchased. Future
purchases of our shares can be made in the open market or privately negotiated transactions, at the
discretion of management and as market conditions and our liquidity position warrant. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, we did not purchase any of our registered shares.
Under our restricted share plan, employees may elect to have us withhold registered shares to
satisfy minimum statutory federal, state and local tax withholding obligations arising on the
vesting of restricted stock awards and exercise of options. When we withhold these shares, we are
required to remit to the appropriate taxing authorities the market price of the shares withheld,
which could be deemed a purchase of the registered shares by us on the date of withholding. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we withheld registered shares to satisfy these tax withholding
obligations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
No. of Shares |
|
Average Price |
January 1 January 31, 2010 |
|
|
237,018 |
|
|
$ |
17.96 |
|
February 1 February 28, 2010 |
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
15.45 |
|
March 1 March 31, 2010 |
|
|
256,849 |
|
|
|
17.22 |
|
53
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
First amendment to the Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock corporation,
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective March 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed March 23,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss joint-stock corporation, Performance Unit Award Agreement,
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File
No. 1-34258) filed March 23, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Second amendment to the Weatherford International Lt., a Swiss joint-stock corporation,
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective April 8, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed April 9,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss
joint-stock corporation, and Bernard J. Duroc-Danner, Peter T. Fontana, Joseph C. Henry, Carel W.
J. Hoyer, James M. Hudgins and William B. Jacobson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-34258) filed April 13, 2010). |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
**32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
**32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
**101
|
|
The following materials from Weatherford International Ltd.s, a Swiss joint-stock corporation,
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL eXtensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows, (iv) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income and (v) the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, tagged as blocks of
text. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed with this Form 10-Q/A |
|
** |
|
Furnished with this Form 10-Q/A |
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weatherford International Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Andrew P. Becnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew P. Becnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 13, 2011 |
|
|
55