Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to _______
Commission file number: 0-26906
ASTA FUNDING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
22-3388607
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
210 Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
07632
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number: (201) 567-5648
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 8, 2011, the registrant had approximately 14,633,138 common shares
outstanding.
ASTA FUNDING, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
81,058,000 |
|
|
$ |
84,235,000 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,202,000 |
|
|
|
1,304,000 |
|
Consumer receivables acquired for liquidation (at net realizable value) |
|
|
139,579,000 |
|
|
|
147,031,000 |
|
Due from third party collection agencies and attorneys |
|
|
2,425,000 |
|
|
|
3,528,000 |
|
Prepaid and income taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,000 |
|
Furniture and equipment, net |
|
|
446,000 |
|
|
|
338,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
18,307,000 |
|
|
|
18,762,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,396,000 |
|
|
|
3,770,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
247,413,000 |
|
|
$ |
259,164,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
79,268,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,483,000 |
|
Subordinated debt related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,386,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,314,000 |
|
|
|
2,105,000 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
292,000 |
|
|
|
292,000 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,204,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
82,078,000 |
|
|
|
97,266,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 14,633,188 shares at December 31, 2010 and
14,600,423 at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
146,000 |
|
|
|
146,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
73,715,000 |
|
|
|
72,717,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
91,400,000 |
|
|
|
89,026,000 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
74,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
165,335,000 |
|
|
|
161,898,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
247,413,000 |
|
|
$ |
259,164,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income, net |
|
$ |
10,759,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,974,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
79,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,838,000 |
|
|
|
11,053,000 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,481,000 |
|
|
|
5,629,000 |
|
Interest expense (fiscal year 2011 - Related Party $86,000;
fiscal year - 2010 - Related Party $130,000) |
|
|
879,000 |
|
|
|
1,259,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,360,000 |
|
|
|
6,888,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,478,000 |
|
|
|
4,165,000 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,812,000 |
|
|
|
1,690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,666,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,475,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share Basic |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,606,121 |
|
|
|
14,272,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,827,767 |
|
|
|
14,615,054 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, September
30, 2010 |
|
|
14,600,423 |
|
|
$ |
146,000 |
|
|
$ |
72,717,000 |
|
|
$ |
89,026,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
161,898,000 |
|
Restricted common
stock |
|
|
32,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based
compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998,000 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292,000 |
) |
Accumulated other
comprehensive
income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,666,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,666,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
14,633,188 |
|
|
$ |
146,000 |
|
|
$ |
73,715,000 |
|
|
$ |
91,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
74,000 |
|
|
$ |
165,335,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,666,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,475,000 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of
tax Foreign currency translation |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
(41,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
2,731,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,434,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
74,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,666,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,475,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
307,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
455,000 |
|
|
|
(245,000 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
998,000 |
|
|
|
559,000 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(638,000 |
) |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
Due from third party collection agencies and attorneys |
|
|
1,103,000 |
|
|
|
515,000 |
|
Income taxes payable and receivable |
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
1,856,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(724,000 |
) |
|
|
(433,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,328,000 |
|
|
|
5,020,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(2,883,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,300,000 |
) |
Principal collected on receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
10,245,000 |
|
|
|
16,755,000 |
|
Principal collected on receivables accounts represented by
account sales |
|
|
101,000 |
|
|
|
1,701,000 |
|
Foreign exchange effect on receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,000 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(164,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
7,289,000 |
|
|
|
16,108,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit arising from vesting of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
Changes in restricted cash |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
442,000 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(292,000 |
) |
|
|
(285,000 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(15,603,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,389,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(15,793,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,181,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,176,000 |
) |
|
|
(53,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign exchange on cash |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
84,235,000 |
|
|
|
2,385,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
81,058,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,337,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (Related Party : 2011 $122,000; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 $172,000) |
|
$ |
943,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,377,000 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Business
Asta Funding, Inc., together with its wholly owned significant operating subsidiaries
Palisades Collection LLC, Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC (Palisades XVI), VATIV Recovery
Solutions LLC (VATIV) and other subsidiaries, not all wholly owned, and not considered material
(the Company, we or us), is engaged in the business of purchasing, managing for its own
account and servicing distressed consumer receivables, including charged-off receivables,
semi-performing receivables and performing receivables. The primary charged-off receivables are
accounts that have been written-off by the originators and may have been previously serviced by
collection agencies. Semi-performing receivables are accounts where the debtor is currently making
partial or irregular monthly payments, but the accounts may have been written-off by the
originators. Performing receivables are accounts where the debtor is making regular monthly
payments that may or may not have been delinquent in the past. Distressed consumer receivables are
the unpaid debts of individuals to banks, finance companies and other credit providers. A large
portion of the Companys distressed consumer receivables are MasterCard(R), Visa(R), other credit
card accounts, and telecommunication accounts which were charged-off by the issuers for
non-payment. The Company acquires these portfolios at substantial discounts from their face values.
The discounts are based on the characteristics (issuer, account size, debtor residence and age of
debt) of the underlying accounts of each portfolio.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010, the condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders equity as of and for the three months ended
December 31, 2010 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three month
periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, are unaudited. The September 30, 2010 financial
information included in this report has been extracted from our audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary
to present fairly our financial position at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the results
of operations for the three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and cash flows for the
three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 have been made. The results of operations for
the three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results for any other interim period or the full fiscal year.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
and therefore do not include all information and note disclosures required under generally accepted
accounting principles. The Company suggests that these financial statements be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates including managements estimates of future cash flows and the resulting rates of return.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 generally represents a revision to former FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and
changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is
not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. ASU 2009-17 also
requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable
interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASU
2009-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods
within the first annual reporting period. The Company adopted ASU 2009-17 as of October 1, 2010,
which did not have a significant effect on its financial statements.
7
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (CONTINUED)
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the Condensed
Balance Sheet date of December 31, 2010, for items that should potentially be recognized or
disclosed in these financial statements. The Company did not identify any items which would require
disclosure in or adjustment to the Financial Statements.
NOTE 2 PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
NOTE 3 CONSUMER RECEIVABLES ACQUIRED FOR LIQUIDATION
Accounts acquired for liquidation are stated at their net estimated realizable value and
consist primarily of defaulted consumer loans to individuals throughout the country and in Central
and South America.
The Company accounts for its investments in consumer receivable portfolios, using either:
|
|
|
the interest method; or |
|
|
|
|
the cost recovery method. |
The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables using the interest method
under the guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), Receivables Loans and Debt
Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, (ASC 310). Under the guidance of ASC 310,
static pools of accounts are established. These pools are aggregated based on certain common risk
criteria. Each static pool is recorded at cost and is accounted for as a single unit for the
recognition of income, principal payments and loss provision.
Once a static pool is established for a quarter, individual receivable accounts are
not added to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or
returned to the seller). ASC 310 requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over
expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or expense or on the balance
sheet. ASC 310 initially freezes the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, estimated when
the accounts receivable are purchased, as the basis for subsequent impairment testing. Significant
increases in actual or expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively through an upward
adjustment of the IRR over a portfolios remaining life. Any increase to the IRR then becomes the
new benchmark for impairment testing. Rather than lowering the estimated IRR if the collection
estimates are not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be
impaired, or written down to maintain the then current IRR. Under the interest method, income is
recognized on the effective yield method based on the actual cash collected during a period and
future estimated cash flows and timing of such collections and the portfolios cost. Revenue
arising from collections in excess of anticipated amounts attributable to timing differences is
deferred until such time as a review results in a change in the expected cash flows. The estimated
future cash flows are reevaluated quarterly.
The Company uses the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of accounts
cannot be reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no income is recognized until the
cost of the portfolio has been fully recovered. A pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying
balance on the balance sheet) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash
collections are recognized as revenue when received.
8
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 CONSUMER RECEIVABLES ACQUIRED FOR LIQUIDATION (CONTINUED)
The Companys extensive liquidating experience is in the field of distressed credit card
receivables, telecommunication receivables, consumer loan receivables, retail installment
contracts, consumer receivables, and auto deficiency receivables. The Company uses the interest
method for accounting for asset acquisitions within these classes of receivables when it believes
it can reasonably estimate the timing of the cash flows. In those situations where the Company
diversifies its acquisitions into other asset classes and the Company does not possess the same
expertise, or the Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of the cash flows, the
Company utilizes the cost recovery method of accounting for those portfolios of receivables. At
December 31, 2010, approximately $43.3 million of the consumer receivables acquired for liquidation
are accounted for using the interest method, while approximately $96.3 million are accounted for
using the cost recovery method, of which $87.7 million is concentrated in one portfolio, a $300
million portfolio purchase in March 2007 ( the Portfolio Purchase).
The Company aggregates portfolios of receivables acquired sharing specific common
characteristics which were acquired within a given quarter. The Company currently considers for
aggregation portfolios of accounts, purchased within the same fiscal quarter, that generally meet
the following characteristics:
|
|
|
Same issuer/originator; |
|
|
|
|
Same underlying credit quality; |
|
|
|
|
similar geographic distribution of the accounts; |
|
|
|
|
similar age of the receivable; and |
|
|
|
|
Same type of asset class (credit cards, telecommunication, etc.) |
The Company uses a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors to estimate collections and
the timing thereof. This analysis includes the following variables:
|
|
|
the number of collection agencies previously attempting to collect the receivables in
the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
the average balance of the receivables, as higher balances might be more difficult to
collect while low balances might not be cost effective to collect; |
|
|
|
|
the age of the receivables, as older receivables might be more difficult to collect
or might be less cost effective. On the other hand, the passage of time, in certain
circumstances, might result in higher collections due to changing life events of some
individual debtors; |
|
|
|
|
past history of performance of similar assets; |
|
|
|
|
time since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
payments made since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
the credit originator and its credit guidelines; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to analyze accounts and resell accounts that meet our criteria for resale; |
9
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 CONSUMER RECEIVABLES ACQUIRED FOR LIQUIDATION (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
the locations of the debtors, as there are better states to
attempt to collect in and ultimately the Company has better
predictability of the liquidations and the expected cash
flows. Conversely, there are also states where the
liquidation rates are not as favorable and that is factored
into our cash flow analysis; |
|
|
|
financial condition of the seller |
|
|
|
|
jobs or property of the debtors found within portfolios. In the Companys
business model, this is of particular importance as debtors with jobs or
property are more likely to repay their obligation and conversely,
debtors without jobs or property are less likely to repay their
obligation; and |
|
|
|
|
The ability to obtain timely customer statements from the original issuer. |
The Company obtains and utilizes, as appropriate, input, including but not limited to
monthly collection projections and liquidation rates, from our third party collection agencies and
attorneys, as further evidentiary matter, to assist in evaluating and developing collection
strategies and in evaluating and modeling the expected cash flows for a given portfolio.
10
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 CONSUMER RECEIVABLES ACQUIRED FOR LIQUIDATION (CONTINUED)
The following tables summarize the changes in the balance sheet account of consumer
receivables acquired for liquidation during the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Method |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
46,348,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,683,000 |
|
|
$ |
147,031,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
2,659,000 |
|
|
|
224,000 |
|
|
|
2,883,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of consumer
receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(15,579,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,371,000 |
) |
|
|
(20,950,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by account sales
of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(155,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Finance income recognized (1) |
|
|
10,065,000 |
|
|
|
694,000 |
|
|
|
10,759,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
43,338,000 |
|
|
$ |
96,241,000 |
|
|
$ |
139,579,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $8.8 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Method |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
70,650,000 |
|
|
$ |
137,611,000 |
|
|
$ |
208,261,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
2,148,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
2,300,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of consumer
receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(19,047,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,786,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,833,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by account sales
of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(2,593,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,597,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
Finance income recognized (1) |
|
|
10,618,000 |
|
|
|
356,000 |
|
|
|
10,974,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
61,776,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,350,000 |
|
|
$ |
192,126,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
49.1 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $8.1 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
11
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 CONSUMER RECEIVABLES ACQUIRED FOR LIQUIDATION (CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $139.6 million in consumer receivables acquired
for liquidation, of which $43.3 million are accounted for on the interest method. Based upon
current projections, net cash collections, applied to principal for interest method portfolios will
be as follows for the twelve months in the periods ending:
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 (nine months remaining) |
|
$ |
15,172,000 |
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
|
15,984,000 |
|
September 30, 2013 |
|
|
7,833,000 |
|
September 30, 2014 |
|
|
3,953,000 |
|
September 30, 2015 |
|
|
978,000 |
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
|
725,000 |
|
September 30, 2017 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
September 30, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
44,825,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,487,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
43,338,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable yield represents the amount of income the Company can expect to generate over
the remaining life of its existing portfolios based on estimated future net cash flows as of
December 31, 2010. Changes in accretable yield for the three month periods ended December 31, 2010
and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
15,255,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,875,000 |
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
|
(10,065,000 |
) |
|
|
(10,618,000 |
) |
Additions representing expected revenue from purchases |
|
|
732,000 |
|
|
|
809,000 |
|
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference |
|
|
7,952,000 |
|
|
|
7,590,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
13,874,000 |
|
|
$ |
23,656,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company purchased $7.6 million of
face value of charged-off consumer receivables at a cost of $2.9 million, $2.7 million of which is
classified under the interest method. The interest method has been
utilized as the Company has obtained the required input from various
third parties to reasonably estimate the timing of cash flows. The receivables purchased during the first quarter of 2010
include semi-performing litigation-related medical accounts receivable portfolios whereby the
Company is assigned the revenue stream. As a portion of the accounts are performing, the cost of
the portfolio is higher than the traditional charged off non-performing assets At December 31,
2010, the estimated remaining net collections on the interest method receivables purchased in the
three months ended December 31, 2010 is $3.4 million, of which $2.6 million represents principal.
12
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 CONSUMER RECEIVABLES ACQUIRED FOR LIQUIDATION (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes collections on a gross basis as received by the Companys
third-party collection agencies and attorneys, less commissions and direct costs for the three
month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross collections (1) |
|
$ |
33,384,000 |
|
|
$ |
43,727,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees (2) |
|
|
12,279,000 |
|
|
|
14,297,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net collections |
|
$ |
21,105,000 |
|
|
$ |
29,430,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gross collections include: collections from third-party
collection agencies and attorneys, collections from our
in-house efforts, and collections represented by account
sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Commissions and fees are the contractual commission earned
by third party collection agencies and attorneys, and
direct costs associated with the collection effort,
generally court costs. Includes a 3% fee charged by a
servicer on gross collections received by the Company in
connection with the Portfolio Purchase. Such arrangement
was consummated in December 2007. The fee is charged for
asset location, skiptracing and ultimately suing debtors in
connection with this portfolio purchase. |
NOTE 4 FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
Furniture and equipment consist of the following as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Furniture |
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
2,999,000 |
|
|
|
2,855,000 |
|
Software |
|
|
174,000 |
|
|
|
153,000 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569,000 |
|
|
|
3,404,000 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
3,123,000 |
|
|
|
3,066,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
446,000 |
|
|
$ |
338,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5 DEBT AND SUBORDINATED DEBT RELATED PARTY
The Companys debt and subordinated debt related party at December 31, 2010 and September
30, 2010 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
Receivables Financing Agreement |
|
$ |
79,268,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,483,000 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt related party |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,386,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
8.69 |
% |
Leumi Credit Agreement
On December 14, 2009, Asta Funding, Inc. and its subsidiaries other than Palisades XVI,
entered into a revolving credit agreement with Bank Leumi ( the Leumi Credit Agreement) which
permits maximum principal advances of up to $6 million. This agreement expired on December 31,
2010. The interest rate was a floating rate equal to the Bank Leumi Reference Rate plus 2%, with a
floor of 4.5%. The loan was secured by collateral consisting of all of the assets of the Company
other than those of Palisades XVI. In addition, other collateral for the loan consisted of a pledge
of cash and securities by GMS Family Investors, LLC, an investment company owned by members of the
Stern family in the form of cash and securities with a value of 133% of the loan commitment. There
were no financial covenant restrictions for the Leumi Credit Agreement. On December 14, 2009
approximately $3.6 million of the Bank Leumi credit line was drawn and used to reduce to zero the
remaining balance of the IDB Credit Facility described below. The balance at December 31, 2009 on
the Leumi Credit Agreement was approximately $1.5 million. The Leumi Credit Agreement balance was
reduced to zero in January 2010 and remained at zero until its expiration on December 31, 2010.
Currently, the Company does not have a new agreement in place, and there is no assurance that a new agreement will be reached, but the Company has maintained ongoing discussions with Bank Leumi regarding entering into a new and
more substantial credit agreement.
Receivables Financing Agreement
In March 2007, Palisades XVI borrowed approximately $227 million under the Receivable
Financing Agreement with Bank of Montreal (BMO), as amended in July 2007, December 2007, May
2008, February 2009 and October 2010, in order to finance the Portfolio Purchase. The Portfolio
Purchase had a purchase price of $300 million (plus 20% of net payments after Palisades XVI
recovers 150% of its purchase price plus cost of funds, which recovery has not yet occurred). Prior
to the modification, discussed below, the debt was full recourse only to Palisades XVI and accrued
interest at the rate of approximately 170 basis points over LIBOR. The original term of the
agreement was three years. This term was extended by each of the Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth
Amendments to the Receivables Financing Agreement as discussed below. Proceeds received as a result
of the net collections from the Portfolio Purchase are applied to interest and principal of the
underlying loan. The Portfolio Purchase is serviced by Palisades Collection LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, which has engaged unaffiliated subservicers for a majority of the
Portfolio Purchase.
14
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5 DEBT AND SUBORDINATED DEBT RELATED PARTY (CONTINUED)
Since the inception of the Receivables Financing Agreement amendments have been signed to
revise various terms of the Receivables Financing Agreement. The following is a summary of the
material amendments:
Second Amendment Receivables Financing Agreement, dated December 27, 2007, revised the
amortization schedule of the loan from 25 months to approximately 31 months. BMO charged Palisades
XVI a fee of $475,000 which was paid on January 10, 2008.
Third Amendment Receivables Financing Agreement, dated May 19, 2008, extended the payments
of the loan through December 2010. The lender also increased the interest rate from 170 basis
points over LIBOR to approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR, subject to automatic reduction in
the future if additional capital contributions are made by the parent of Palisades XVI.
Fourth Amendment Receivables Financing Agreement, dated February 20, 2009, among other
things, (i) lowered the collection rate minimum to $1 million per month (plus interest and fees) as
an average for each period of three consecutive months, (ii) provided for an automatic extension of
the maturity date from April 30, 2011 to April 30, 2012 should the outstanding balance be reduced
to $25 million or less by April 30, 2011 and (iii) permanently waived the previous termination
events. The interest rate remained unchanged at approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR, subject
to automatic reduction in the future should certain collection milestones be attained.
As additional credit support for repayment by Palisades XVI of its obligations under the
Receivables Financing Agreement and as an inducement for BMO to enter into the Fourth Amendment,
the Company provided BMO a limited recourse, subordinated guaranty, secured by the assets of the
Company, in an amount not to exceed $8.0 million plus reasonable costs of enforcement and
collection. Under the terms of the guaranty, BMO could not exercise any recourse against the
Company until the earlier of (i) five years from the date of the Fourth Amendment and (ii) the
termination of the Companys existing senior lending facility or any successor senior facility.
On October 26, 2010, Palisades XVI entered into the Fifth Amendment to the Receivables
Financing Agreement (the Fifth Amendment). The effective date of the Fifth Amendment was October
14, 2010. The Fifth Amendment (i) extended the expiration date of the Receivables Financing
Agreement to April 14, 2014; (ii) reduced the minimum monthly total payment to $750,000; (iii)
accelerated the Companys guaranty credit enhancement of $8,700,000, which was paid upon execution
of the Fifth Amendment; (iv) eliminated the Companys limited guaranty of repayment of the loans
outstanding by Palisades XVI; and (v) revised the definition of Borrowing Base Deficit, as
defined in the Receivables Financing Agreement, to mean the excess, if any, of 105% of the loans
outstanding over the borrowing base.
In connection with the Fifth Amendment, on October 26, 2010, the Company entered into the
Omnibus Termination Agreement (the Termination Agreement). The Termination Agreement provides
that, upon payment of $8,700,000 to the Lender and execution of the Fifth Amendment, the following
agreements, which were entered into by the Company and certain of its affiliated entities in
connection with the guaranty of the outstanding loans under the Receivables Financing Agreement,
were terminated: (i) the Subordinated Limited Recourse Guaranty Agreement, dated February 20, 2009,
among the Company, its subsidiaries, and BMO; (ii) the Subordinated Guarantor Security Agreement,
dated February 20, 2009; (iii) the Limited Recourse Guaranty Agreement, dated as of February 20,
2009; and (iv) the Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2009. The Termination
Agreement was effective as of October 14, 2010.
The aggregate minimum repayment obligations required under the Fifth Amendment including
interest and principal for fiscal years ending September 30, 2011 through 2013 are $9 million
annually and, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, is approximately $5 million (seven
months).
On December 31, 2010 and 2009, the outstanding balance on this loan was approximately
$79.3 million and $99.7 million, respectively. The applicable interest rate at December 31, 2010
and 2009 was 3.76% and 3.77%, respectively. The average interest rate of the Receivable Financing
Agreement was 3.76% for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Companys average debt obligation (excluding the subordinated debt related party)
for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, was approximately $82.7 million and $111.2
million, respectively. The average interest rate was 3.76% and 3.90%, respectively, for the periods
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
15
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 5 DEBT AND SUBORDINATED DEBT RELATED PARTY (CONTINUED)
IDB Credit Facility
The Eighth Amendment to the IDB Credit Facility, entered into on July 10, 2009, granted an
initial $40 million line of credit from a consortium of banks (the Bank Group) for portfolio
purchases and working capital and was scheduled to reduce to zero by December 31, 2009. The IDB
Credit Facility accrued interest at the lesser of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or the prime
rate minus an applicable margin, based on certain leverage ratios, with a minimum rate of 5.5%.
The IDB Credit Facility was collateralized by all assets of the Company other than the assets of
Palisades XVI and contained financial and other covenants. The IDB Credit Facilitys commitment
termination date was December 31, 2009. This IDB facility was repaid in full on December 14, 2009.
Subordinated Debt Related Party
On April 29, 2008, the Company obtained a subordinated loan pursuant to a subordinated
promissory note from the Family Entity. The Family Entity is a greater than 5% shareholder of the
Company beneficially owned and controlled by Arthur Stern, a Director of the Company, Gary Stern,
the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and members of their families.
The loan was in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $8.2 million, bore interest at a
rate of 6.25% per annum, was payable interest only each quarter until its maturity date of January
9, 2010, subject to prior repayment in full of the IDB Credit Facility. The subordinated loan was
incurred by the Company to resolve certain issues related to the activities of one of the
subservicers utilized by Palisades Collection LLC under the Receivables Financing Agreement.
Proceeds from the subordinated loan were used initially to further collateralize the Companys IDB
Credit Facility and was used to reduce the balance due on that facility as of May 31, 2008. In
December 2009, the subordinated debt-related party maturity date was extended through December 31,
2010. In addition the interest rate was changed to 10% per annum effective January 2010.
Approximately $3.8 million of the loan was repaid in fiscal year 2010, with the remaining $4.4
million repaid during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, including the final payment of $2.4
million on December 30, 2010, reducing the balance to zero.
16
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Employment Agreements
In January 2007, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the Employment Agreement)
with Gary Stern, its Chairman, President and Chief Executive, which expired on December 31, 2009.
This Employment Agreement was not renewed and Mr. Stern is continuing in his current roles at the
discretion of the Board of Directors until a new agreement is signed. The Company intend to
negotiate a new employment agreement with Mr. Stern during fiscal year 2011.
On November 30, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting services agreement with
Cameron Williams, its former Chief Operating Officer. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company
paid Mr. Williams a monthly fee of $20,833.33 for the one year period ending December 31, 2010 in
exchange for certain consulting services. In addition, in exchange for a release of all claims and
liabilities, we paid Mr. Williams a fee of $100,000, reimbursed his monthly COBRA costs of up to
$1,000 per month, and accelerated vesting of 16,667 stock options , exercisable at a price of $2.95
per share, held by Mr. Williams. Also, Mr. Williams signed another release in favor of the Company
and was paid $20,833.37 at the end of this consulting term in December 2010.
Leases
The Company leases its facilities in Englewood Cliffs and Sugar Land, Texas. Please refer to
the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
for additional information.
Litigation
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is involved in numerous legal proceedings.
The Company regularly initiates collection lawsuits, using its network of third party law firms,
against consumers. Also, consumers occasionally initiate litigation against the Company, in which
they allege that the Company has violated a federal or state law in the process of collecting their
account. The Company does not believe that these matters are material to its business or financial
condition. The Company is not involved in any material litigation in which it is a defendant.
NOTE 7. INCOME RECOGNITION, IMPAIRMENTS, AND COMMISSIONS AND FEES
Income Recognition
The Company accounts for its investment in consumer receivables acquired for liquidation using
the interest method under the guidance of FASB ASC 310. In ASC 310 static pools of accounts are
established. These pools are aggregated based on certain common risk criteria. Each static pool is
recorded at cost and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal
payments and loss provision.
Once a static pool is established for a quarter, individual receivable accounts are not
added to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned
to the seller). ASC 310 requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash
flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or expense or on the balance sheet. ASC 310
initially freezes the internal rate of return (IRR), estimated when the accounts receivable are
purchased, as the basis for subsequent impairment testing. Significant increases in actual, or
expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR
over a portfolios remaining life. Any increase to the IRR then becomes the new benchmark for
impairment testing. Under ASC 310, rather than lowering the estimated IRR if the collection
estimates are not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be
written down to maintain the then current IRR.
Finance income is recognized on cost recovery portfolios after the carrying value has
been fully recovered through collections or amounts written down.
17
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7. INCOME RECOGNITION, IMPAIRMENTS AND COMMISSIONS AND FEES (CONTINUED)
Impairments
The Company accounts for its impairments in accordance with ASC 310, which provides guidance
on how to account for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investors
initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are
attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. Increases in expected cash flows are recognized
prospectively through an adjustment of the internal rate of return while decreases in expected cash
flows are recognized as impairments. ASC 310 makes it more likely that impairment losses and
accretable yield adjustments for portfolios performances which exceed original collection
projections will be recorded, as all downward revisions in collection estimates will result in
impairment charges, given the requirement that the IRR of the affected pool be held constant. There
were no impairments recorded during the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Companys analysis of the timing and amount of cash flows to be generated by our portfolio
purchases are based on the following attributes:
|
|
|
the type of receivable, the location of the debtor and the
number of collection agencies previously attempting to
collect the receivables in the portfolio. The Company has
found that there are better states to try to collect
receivables and we factor in both better and worse states
when establishing our initial cash flow expectations. |
|
|
|
|
the average balance of the receivables influences our
analysis in that lower average balance portfolios tend to
be more collectible in the short-term and higher average
balance portfolios are more appropriate for our law suit
strategy and thus yield better results over the longer
term. As the Company has significant experience with both
types of balances, it is able to factor these variables
into our initial expected cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
the age of the receivables, the number of days since
charge-off, any payments since charge-off, and the credit
guidelines of the credit originator also represent factors
taken into consideration in our estimation process. For
example, older receivables might be more difficult and/or
require more time and effort to collect; |
|
|
|
past history and performance of similar assets acquired. As the Company purchase
portfolios of like assets, we accumulate a significant historical data base on the
tendencies of debtor repayments and factor this into our initial expected cash
flows; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to analyze accounts and resell accounts that meet its criteria; |
|
|
|
|
jobs or property of the debtors found within portfolios. With our business model,
this is of particular importance. Debtors with jobs or property are more likely to
repay their obligation through the lawsuit strategy and, conversely, debtors without
jobs or property are less likely to repay their obligation. The Company believes
that debtors with jobs or property are more likely to repay because courts have
mandated the debtor must pay the debt. Ultimately, the debtor with property will pay
to clear title or release a lien. The Company also believes that these debtors
generally might take longer to repay and that is factored into our initial expected
cash flows; and |
|
|
|
|
credit standards of the issuer. |
18
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7. INCOME RECOGNITION, IMPAIRMENTS AND COMMISSIONS AND FEES (CONTINUED)
The Company acquires accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality
between origination and the date of our acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for a
portfolio of accounts reflects our determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the portfolio of accounts contractual terms. The Company
considers the expected payments and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected
principal, interest and other cash flows for each acquired portfolio coupled with expected cash
flows from accounts available for sales. The excess of this amount over the cost of the portfolio,
representing the excess of the accounts cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid,
is accreted into income recognized on finance receivables accounted for on the interest method over
the expected remaining life of the portfolio.
The Company believes it has significant experience in acquiring certain distressed
consumer receivable portfolios at a significant discount to the amount actually owed by underlying
debtors. The Company acquires these portfolios only after both qualitative and quantitative
analyses of the underlying receivables are performed and a calculated purchase price is paid so
that we believe our estimated cash flow offers us an adequate return on our acquisition costs after
our servicing expenses. Additionally, when considering larger portfolio purchases of accounts, or
portfolios from issuers with whom the Company has limited experience, it has the added benefit of
soliciting its third party collection agencies and attorneys for their input on liquidation rates
and, at times, incorporate such input into the estimates we use for its expected cash flows.
As a result of the recent and current challenging economic environment and the impact it has
had on the collections, for the non-medical account portfolio purchases acquired since the beginning of fiscal year 2009,
the Company has extended its time frame of the expectation of recovering 100% of its invested
capital to within a 24-29 month period from an 18-28 month period, and the expectation of
recovering 130-140% of invested capital to a period of 7 years, which is an increase from the
previous 5-year expectation. The medical accounts have a shorter 3-year collection curve based on the nature of these accounts. The Company routinely monitors these expectations against the actual
cash flows and, in the event the cash flows are below its expectations and it believes there are no
reasons relating to mere timing differences or explainable delays (such as can occur particularly
when the court system is involved) for the reduced collections, an impairment would be recorded as
a provision for credit losses. Conversely, in the event the cash flows are in excess of our
expectations and the reason is due to timing, it would defer the excess collection as deferred
revenue.
Commissions and fees
Commissions and fees are the contractual commissions earned by third party collection agencies
and attorneys, and direct costs associated with the collection effort- generally court costs. The
Company expects to continue to purchase portfolios and utilize third party collection agencies and
attorney networks.
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
Deferred federal and state taxes principally arise from (i) recognition of finance income
collected for tax purposes, but not yet recognized for financial reporting; (ii) provision for
impairments/credit losses; and (iii) stock based compensation expense for stock option grants and
restricted stock awards recorded in the statement of operations for which no cash distribution has
been made. Other components consist of state net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards. The
provision for income tax expense for the three month periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, reflects income tax expense at an effective rate of 40.5% and 40.6, respectively.
The corporate federal income tax returns of the Company for 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are
subject to examination by the IRS, generally for three years after they are filed. The state income
tax returns and other state filings of the Company are subject to examination by the state taxing
authorities, for various periods generally up to four years after they are filed.
In April 2010, the Company received notification from the IRS that the Companys 2008 and 2009
federal income tax returns would be audited. This audit is currently in progress.
19
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 9. NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic per share data is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly, except that it
includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of securities, including the effect of shares
issuable under the Companys stock based compensation plans. With respect to the assumed proceeds
from the exercise of dilutive options, the treasury stock method is calculated using the average
market price for the period.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted per share data for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Income) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2,666,000 |
|
|
|
14,606,121 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
2,475,000 |
|
|
|
14,272,420 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2,666,000 |
|
|
|
14,827,767 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
2,475,000 |
|
|
|
14,615,054 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, 778,699 options at a weighted average exercise price of $14.59 were
not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were antidilutive.
At December 31, 2009, 654,042 options at a weighted average exercise price of $16.87 were not
included in the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were antidilutive.
20
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 10. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation under ASC 718, Compensation
Stock Compensation (ASC 718). ASC 718 requires that compensation expense associated with stock
options and other stock based awards be recognized in the statement of operations, rather than a
disclosure in the notes to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted
324,800 stock options, of which 30,000 options were issued to each non-employee independent
director for a total of 150,000 stock options. 60,000 stock options were awarded to the Chief
Executive Officer, and 30,000 stock options were awarded to the Chief Financial Officer and the
Senior Vice President. The remaining 54,800 stock options were granted to full time employees of
the Company, who had been employed at the Company for at least six months prior to the date of
grant. Additionally, in December 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors issued
32,765 shares of restricted stock to the Chief Executive Officer. The exercise price of all stock
options was at the market price on the date of the grant. All stock options and restricted shares
vest in three equal annual installments, commencing on the date of grant/issuance.
The weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
106.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
In December 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted
25,000 stock options to each director of the Company other than the Chief Executive Officer, for a
total of 150,000 options, and 8,900 stock options to full time employees of the Company, who had
been employed at the Company for at least six months prior to the date of grant. The grants to
employees exclude officers of the Company. The exercise price of these options was at the market
price on the date of the grant.
The weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
110.2 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
21
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 11. STOCK OPTION PLANS
Equity Compensation Plan
On December 1, 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the Companys Equity Compensation Plan
(the Equity Compensation Plan), subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company. The
Equity Compensation Plan was adopted to supplement the Companys existing 2002 Stock Option Plan.
In addition to permitting the grant of stock options as are permitted under the 2002 Stock Option
Plan, the Equity Compensation Plan allows the Company flexibility with respect to equity awards by
also providing for grants of stock awards (i.e. restricted or unrestricted), stock purchase rights
and stock appreciation rights. One million shares were authorized for issuance under the Equity
Compensation Plan. The Equity Compensation Plan was ratified by the stockholders on March 1, 2006.
The following description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the Equity Compensation Plan, which is included as an exhibit to the
Companys reports filed with the SEC.
The general purpose of the Equity Compensation Plan is to provide an incentive to the
Companys employees, directors and consultants, including executive officers, employees and
consultants of any subsidiaries, by enabling them to share in the future growth of the business.
The Board of Directors believes that the granting of stock options and other equity awards promotes
continuity of management and increases incentive and personal interest in the welfare of the
Company by those who are primarily responsible for shaping and carrying out its long range plans
and securing our growth and financial success.
The Board believes that the Equity Compensation Plan will advance the Companys interests by
enhancing its ability to (a) attract and retain employees, directors and consultants who are in a
position to make significant contributions to its success; (b) reward employees, directors and
consultants for these contributions; and (c) encourage employees, directors and consultants to take
into account the Companys long-term interests through ownership of its shares.
The Company has 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Equity
Compensation Plan and 545,569 shares were available as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31,
2010, approximately 102 of the Companys employees were eligible to participate in the Equity
Compensation Plan.
2002 Stock Option Plan
On March 5, 2002, the Board of Directors adopted the Asta Funding, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan
(the 2002 Plan), which plan was approved by the Companys stockholders on May 1, 2002. The 2002
Plan was adopted in order to attract and retain qualified directors, officers and employees of, and
consultants to, the Company. The following description does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2002 Plan, which is included as an
exhibit to the Companys reports filed with the SEC.
The 2002 Plan authorizes the granting of incentive stock options (as defined in Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code)) and non-qualified stock options to
eligible employees of the Company, including officers and directors of the Company(whether or not
employees) and consultants of the Company.
The Company has 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2002 Plan
and 139,734 shares were available as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, approximately
102 of the Companys employees were eligible to participate in the 2002 Plan.
1995 Stock Option Plan
The 1995 Stock Option Plan expired on September 14, 2005. The plan was adopted in order to
attract and retain qualified directors, officers and employees of, and consultants, to the Company.
The following description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the 1995 Stock Option Plan, which is included as an exhibit to the
Companys reports filed with the SEC.
The 1995 Stock Option Plan authorized the granting of incentive stock options (as defined in
Section 422 of the Code) and non-qualified stock options to eligible employees of the Company,
including officers and directors of the Company (whether or not employees) and consultants to the
Company.
22
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 11. STOCK OPTION PLANS (CONTINUED)
The Company authorized 1,840,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the
1995 Stock Option Plan. All but 96,002 shares were utilized. As of September 14, 2005, no more
options could be issued under this plan.
Compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock is recognized over the vesting
period. Compensation expense for restricted stock is based upon the market price of the shares
underlying the awards on the grant date.
The following table summarizes stock option transactions under the 2002 Stock Option Plan, the
1995 Stock Option Plan and the Equity Compensation Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding options at the beginning of
period |
|
|
922,039 |
|
|
$ |
12.70 |
|
|
|
1,157,905 |
|
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
324,800 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
|
|
158,900 |
|
|
|
8.07 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
2.95 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at the end of period |
|
|
1,245,439 |
|
|
$ |
11.18 |
|
|
|
1,316,705 |
|
|
$ |
10.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable options at the end of period |
|
|
954,109 |
|
|
$ |
12.56 |
|
|
|
1,157,382 |
|
|
$ |
11.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about the 2002 Stock Option Plan, the 1995
Stock Option Plan and the Equity Compensation Plan outstanding options as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (in Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
$2.8751 $5.7500 |
|
|
198,168 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
|
168,502 |
|
|
$ |
4.07 |
|
$5.7501 $8.6250 |
|
|
494,000 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
232,336 |
|
|
|
7.39 |
|
$14.3751 $17.2500 |
|
|
198,611 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
|
|
|
198,611 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
|
$17.2501 $20.1250 |
|
|
339,660 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
18.23 |
|
|
|
339,660 |
|
|
|
18.23 |
|
$25.8751 $28.7500 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245,439 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.18 |
|
|
|
954,109 |
|
|
$ |
12.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized $852,000 and $463,000 of compensation expense related to the stock
option grants during each of the three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. As of December 31, 2010, there was $1,676,000 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to stock option awards.
There was no intrinsic value of the outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31,
2010.
23
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 11. STOCK OPTION PLANS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes information about restricted stock transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Unvested at the beginning of period |
|
|
17,669 |
|
|
$ |
19.73 |
|
|
|
35,338 |
|
|
$ |
19.73 |
|
Awards granted |
|
|
32,765 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(28,591 |
) |
|
|
15.11 |
|
|
|
(17,669 |
) |
|
|
19.73 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at the end of period |
|
|
21,843 |
|
|
$ |
7.63 |
|
|
|
17,669 |
|
|
$ |
19.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized $146,000 and $96,000 of compensation expense related to the
restricted stock awards during the three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. As of December 31, 2010, there was $272,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related
to restricted stock awards.
NOTE 12. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
During September 2010, the Company declared a cash dividend aggregating $292,000 ($0.02
per share) which was paid November 1, 2010. In December 2010, the Company declared a quarterly
dividend of $0.02 per share, or $292,000, for shareholders of record as of December 30, 2010, which
was paid on February 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, stockholders equity includes an amount for
other comprehensive income of $74,000, which relates to the Companys investment in a company
domiciled in South America.
NOTE 13. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value information about
financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable
to estimate that value. Because there are a limited number of market participants for certain of
the Companys assets and liabilities, fair value estimates are based upon judgments regarding
credit risk, investor expectation of economic conditions, normal cost of administration and other
risk characteristics, including interest rate and prepayment risk. These estimates are subjective
in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of judgment, which significantly affect the
estimates.
The carrying value of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation was $139,579,000 at
December 31, 2010. The Company computed the fair value of the consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation using its forecasting model and the fair value approximated $168,021,000 at December
31, 2010. The Companys forecasting model utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis. The Companys
cash flows are an estimate of collections for all of our consumer receivables based on variables
fully described in Note 3: Consumer Receivables Acquired for Liquidation. These cash flows are then
discounted using the Company's estimated cost of capital to determine the fair value.
The aggregate carrying value of debt and subordinated debt (related party) was $79,268,000 and
$109,479,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The majority of these loan balances are
variable rate; therefore, the carrying amounts approximate fair value.
24
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than
statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form
10-K, including without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business
strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans and objective of management for
future operations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expects, intends,
plans, projects, estimates, anticipates, or believes or the negative thereof or any
variation there on or similar terminology or expressions.
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections
about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels
of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels
of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Important factors which could materially affect our results and our future performance include,
without limitation, our ability to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices,
changes in government regulations that affect our ability to collect sufficient amounts on our
defaulted consumer receivables, our ability to employ and retain qualified employees, changes in
the credit or capital markets, changes in interest rates, deterioration in economic conditions,
negative press regarding the debt collection industry which may have a negative impact on a
debtors willingness to pay the debt we acquire, and statements of assumption underlying any of the
foregoing, as well as other factors set forth under Item 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons
acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. Except as
required by law, we assume no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Asta Funding, Inc., together with its wholly owned significant operating subsidiaries
Palisades Collection LLC, Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC (Palisades XVI), VATIV Recovery
Solutions LLC (VATIV) and other subsidiaries, not all wholly owned, and not considered material
(the Company, we or us), primarily engaged in the business of acquiring, managing, servicing
and recovering on portfolios of consumer receivables. These portfolios generally consist of one or
more of the following types of consumer receivables:
|
|
|
charged-off receivables accounts that have been
written-off by the originators and may have been previously
serviced by collection agencies; |
|
|
|
|
semi-performing receivables accounts where the debtor is
currently making partial or irregular monthly payments, but
the accounts may have been written-off by the originators;
and |
|
|
|
|
performing receivables accounts where the debtor is
making regular monthly payments that may or may not have
been delinquent in the past. |
25
We acquire these consumer receivable portfolios at a significant discount to the amount
actually owed by the borrowers. We acquire these portfolios after a qualitative and quantitative
analysis of the underlying receivables and calculate the purchase price so
that our estimated cash flow offers us an adequate return on our acquisition costs and
servicing expenses. After purchasing a portfolio, we actively monitor its performance and review
and adjust our collection and servicing strategies accordingly.
We purchase receivables from credit grantors and others through privately negotiated direct
sales and auctions in which sellers of receivables seek bids from several pre-qualified debt
purchasers. We pursue new acquisitions of consumer receivable portfolios on an ongoing basis
through:
|
|
|
our relationships with industry participants, collection agencies, investors and our financing sources; |
|
|
|
|
brokers who specialize in the sale of consumer receivable portfolios; and |
|
|
|
|
other sources. |
Critical Accounting Policies
We account for our investments in consumer receivable portfolios, using either:
|
|
|
the interest method; or |
|
|
|
|
the cost recovery method. |
As we believe our extensive liquidating experience in certain asset classes such as distressed
credit card receivables, telecom receivables, consumer loan receivables and mixed consumer
receivables has matured, we use the interest method when we believe we can reasonably estimate the
timing of the cash flows. In those situations where we diversify our acquisitions into other asset
classes and we do not possess the same expertise, or we cannot reasonably estimate
the timing of the cash flows, we utilize the cost recovery method of accounting for those
portfolios of receivables.
We account for our investment in finance receivables using the interest method under the
guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 310, Receivables Loans and Debt
Securities Acquired with Deteriorating Credit Quality, (ASC 310). Static pools of accounts are
established. These pools are aggregated based on certain common risk criteria. Each static pool is
recorded at cost and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal
payments and loss provision. We currently consider for aggregation portfolios of accounts,
purchased within the same fiscal quarter, that generally have the following characteristics:
|
|
|
same issuer/originator |
|
|
|
|
same underlying credit quality |
|
|
|
|
similar geographic distribution of the accounts |
|
|
|
|
similar age of the receivable and |
|
|
|
|
same type of asset class (credit cards, telecommunications, etc.) |
After determining that an investment will yield an adequate return on our acquisition cost
after servicing fees, including court costs which are expensed as incurred, we use a variety of
qualitative and quantitative factors to determine the estimated cash flows. As previously
mentioned, included in our analysis for purchasing a portfolio of receivables and determining a
reasonable estimate of collections and the timing thereof, the following variables are analyzed and
factored into our original estimates:
|
|
|
the number of collection agencies previously attempting to collect the receivables in the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
the average balance of the receivables; |
|
|
|
the age of the receivables (as older receivables might be more difficult to collect or might be less cost effective); |
|
|
|
|
past history of performance of similar assets as we purchase portfolios of similar assets, we believe we have
built significant history on how these receivables will liquidate and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
number of months since charge-off; |
26
|
|
|
payments made since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
the credit originator and their credit guidelines; |
|
|
|
|
the locations of the debtors as there are better states to attempt to collect in and ultimately we have better
predictability of the liquidations and the expected cash flows. Conversely, there are also states where the
liquidation rates are not as good and that is factored into our cash flow analysis; |
|
|
|
|
financial wherewithal of the seller; |
|
|
|
|
jobs or property of the debtors found within portfolios-with our business model, this is of particular importance as
debtors with jobs or property are more likely to repay their obligation and conversely, debtors without jobs or
property are less likely to repay their obligation ; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain customer statements from the original issuer. |
We will obtain and utilize as appropriate input including, but not limited to, monthly
collection projections and liquidation rates, from our third party collection agencies and
attorneys, as further evidentiary matter, to assist us in developing collection strategies and in
modeling the expected cash flows for a given portfolio.
We acquire accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination
and the date of our acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for a portfolio of accounts
reflects our determination that it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the portfolio of accounts contractual terms. We consider the expected payments and
estimate the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows
for each acquired portfolio coupled with expected cash flows from accounts available for sales. The
excess of this amount over the cost of the portfolio, representing the excess of the accounts cash
flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into income recognized on finance
receivables over the expected remaining life of the portfolio.
We believe we have significant experience in acquiring certain distressed consumer receivable
portfolios at a significant discount to the amount actually owed by underlying debtors. We acquire
these portfolios only after both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the underlying
receivables are performed and a calculated purchase price is paid so that we believe our estimated
cash flow offers us an adequate return on our costs, including servicing expenses. Additionally,
when considering portfolio purchases of accounts, or portfolios from issuers from whom we have
little or limited experience, we have the added benefit of soliciting our third party collection
agencies and attorneys for their input on liquidation rates and, at times, incorporate such input
into the price we offer for a given portfolio and the estimates we use for our expected cash flows.
As a result of the recent and current challenging economic environment and the impact it has
had on the collections, for the non medical account portfolio purchases acquired since the beginning of fiscal year 2009,
we have extended our time frame of the expectation of recovering 100% of our invested capital to
within a 24-29 month period from an 18-28 month period, and the expectation of recovering 130-140%
of invested capital to a period of seven years, which is an increase from the previous five year
expectation. The medical accounts have a shorter three year
collection curve based on the nature of these accounts. We routinely monitor these expectations against the actual cash flows and, in the
event the cash flows are below our expectations and we believe there are no reasons relating to
mere timing differences or explainable delays (such as can occur particularly when the court system
is involved) for the reduced collections, an impairment would be recorded as a provision for credit
losses. Conversely, in the event the cash flows are in excess of our expectations and the reason is
due to timing, we would defer the excess collection as deferred revenue.
We use the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of accounts cannot be
reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no income is recognized until the cost of the
portfolio has been fully recovered. A pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the
balance sheet) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are
recognized as revenue when received.
27
In the following discussions, most percentages and dollar amounts have been rounded to aid
presentation. As a result, all figures are approximations.
Results of Operations
The Three-Month Period Ended December 31, 2010, Compared to the Three-Month Period Ended
December 31, 2009
Finance income. For the three months ended December 31, 2010, finance income decreased $0.2
million or 2.0% to $10.8 million from $11.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
The decrease is primarily due to the lower level of portfolio purchases over the last two and a
half years and, as a result, the increased number of our portfolios that are in the later stages of
their yield curves. The average balance of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation decreased
from $200.2 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2009 to $143.3 million for the
three month period ended December 31, 2010. The decrease is due to the impact of the lower average
balance of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation offset by the increase in income from
fully amortized portfolios (zero basis revenue), which increased $0.7 million to $8.8 million in
the three months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $8.1 million in the same prior year period.
We purchased $2.9 million in new portfolios in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared to
$2.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Net collections for the three months ended December 31, 2010 decreased 28.2% to $21.1 million
from $29.4 million for the same prior year period The decrease is due to the lower level of
purchases over the last two and a half years and the general slow down of the economy. During the
first quarter of fiscal year 2011, gross collections decreased 23.6% to $33.4 million from $43.7
million for the three months ended December 31, 2009. Commissions and fees associated with gross
collections from our third party collection agencies and attorneys decreased $2.0 million, or
14.0%, to $12.3 million from $14.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010.
Commissions and fees amounted to 36.8% of gross collections for the three month period ended
December 31, 2010, compared to 32.7% in the same period of the prior year.
Other income. Other income of $79,000 for three month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
consisted primarily of service fee income and interest income from the banks.
General and Administrative Expenses. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2010,
general and administrative expenses decreased $0.1 million to $5.5 million from $5.6 million for
the three-months ended December 31, 2009. The decrease is attributable to lower professional fees,
amortization expense and bank service charges, significantly offset by higher stock based
compensation expense. Lower amortization expense is the result of the full amortization of loan
fees during fiscal year 2010, related to the Bank of Montreal (BMO) loan (the Receivables
Financing Agreement). The increase in stock based compensation expense, an approximately $1.0
million non-cash item, is due to increased issuances of stock options and restricted stock in
fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009. The comparative non-cash cost of stock based
compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $0.5 million.
Interest Expense. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2010, interest expense
decreased $0.4 million or 30.2% from $1.3 million to $0.9 million for the same period in the prior
year. The lower interest expense in the 2010 fiscal quarter is primarily a reflection of the
continuing pay-down of the BMO loan. Additionally, we paid off the IDB Credit Facility on December
14, 2009, making the final payment by borrowing approximately $3.6 million from the revolving
credit agreement with Bank Leumi (the Leumi Credit Agreement). Our average debt obligation
(excluding the subordinated debt related party) decreased from $111.2 million during the
three-month period ending December 31, 2009 to $82.7 million during the corresponding 2010 period.
Furthermore interest rates on total average debt were slightly lower in the current fiscal quarter
compared to that in the same prior year quarter (a 3.76% average rate on total debt, excluding the
subordinated debt related party as compared to a 3.90% average rate last year).
Income tax expense. Income tax expense, consisting of federal and state income taxes, for
quarter ended December 31, 2010 was $1.8 million as compared to $1.7 million in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010. The state portion of the income tax provision for the first quarter of fiscal
year 2011 and 2010 has been offset against state net operating loss carryforwards with no current
state taxes payable.
Net income. For the quarter ended December 31, 2010, net income was $2.7 million as
compare to $2.5 million for the same prior year quarter, primarily the result of lower interest
expense and reduced general and administrative expenses, partially offset by lower finance income
in the current quarter.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of cash from operations include collections on the receivable portfolios
that we have acquired. Our primary uses of cash include repayment of debt, our purchases of
consumer receivable portfolios, interest payments, costs involved in the collections of consumer
receivables, taxes and dividends, if approved. In the past we relied significantly upon our lenders
to provide the funds necessary for the purchase of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation.
28
Leumi Credit Agreement
On December 14, 2009 we (other than Palisades XVI), entered into the Leumi Credit Agreement
which permitted maximum principal advances of up to $6 million. The term of the agreement was
through December 31, 2010. The interest rate is a floating rate equal to the Bank Leumi Reference
Rate plus 2%, with a floor of 4.5%. The loan was secured by collateral consisting of all of the
assets of the Company other than those of Palisades XVI. In addition, other collateral for the loan
consisted of a pledge by GMS Family Investors, LLC, an investment company owned by members of the
Stern family in the form of cash and securities with a value of 133% of the loan commitment. There
were no financial covenant restrictions for the Leumi Credit Agreement. On December 14, 2009
approximately $3.6 million of the Bank Leumi credit line was used to pay off the remaining balance
of the IDB credit facility described below. The Leumi Credit Agreement is the current senior
facility of the Company. The Leumi Credit Agreement balance was reduced to zero in January 2010
and remained at zero until its expiration on December 31, 2010. Currently, the Company does not have a
new agreement in place, and there is no assurance that a new agreement will be reached, but the Company has maintained ongoing
discussions with Bank Leumi regarding entering into a new and more substantial credit agreement.
Receivables Financing Agreement
In March 2007, Palisades XVI borrowed approximately $227 million under the Receivables
Financing Agreement, as amended in July 2007, December 2007, May 2008, February 2009 and October
2010, with BMO in order to finance the Portfolio Purchase. The Portfolio
Purchase had a purchase price of $300 million (plus 20% of net payments after Palisades XVI
recovers 150% of its purchase price plus cost of funds, which recovery has not yet occurred). Prior
to the modification, discussed below, the debt was full recourse only to Palisades XVI and provided
for an interest rate of approximately 170 basis points over LIBOR. The original term of the
agreement was three years. This term was extended by each of the Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth
Amendments to the Receivables Financing Agreement as discussed below. The Receivables Financing
Agreement contained cross default provisions related to the IDB Credit Facility. This cross default
could only occur in the event of a non-payment in excess of $2.5 million of the IDB Credit
Facility. Proceeds received as a result of the net collections from the Portfolio Purchase are
applied to interest and principal of the underlying loan. The Portfolio Purchase is serviced by
Palisades Collection LLC, our wholly owned subsidiary, which has engaged unaffiliated subservicers
for a majority of the Portfolio Purchase.
Since the inception of the Receivables Financing Agreement amendments have been signed to
revise various terms of the Receivables Financing Agreement. The following is a summary of the
material amendments:
Second Amendment Receivables Financing Agreement, dated December 27, 2007 revised the
amortization schedule of the loan from 25 months to approximately 31 months. BMO charged Palisades
XVI a fee of $475,000 which was paid on January 10, 2008. The fee was capitalized and is being
amortized over the remaining life of the Receivables Financing Agreement.
Third Amendment Receivables Financing Agreement, dated May 19, 2008 extended the
payments of the loan through December 2010. The lender also increased the interest rate from 170
basis points over LIBOR to approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR, subject to automatic
reduction in the future if additional capital contributions are made by the parent of Palisades
XVI.
Fourth Amendment Receivables Financing Agreement, dated February 20, 2009, among other
things, (i) lowered the collection rate minimum to $1 million per month (plus interest and fees) as
an average for each period of three consecutive months, (ii) provided for an automatic extension of
the maturity date from April 30, 2011 to April 30, 2012 should the outstanding balance be reduced
to $25 million or less by April 30, 2011 and (iii) permanently waived the previous termination
events. The interest rate remained unchanged at approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR, subject
to automatic reduction in the future should certain collection milestones be attained.
As additional credit support for repayment by Palisades XVI of its obligations under the
Receivables Financing Agreement and as an inducement for BMO to enter into the Fourth Amendment, we
provided BMO a limited recourse, subordinated guaranty, secured by our assets , in an amount not to
exceed $8.0 million plus reasonable costs of enforcement and collection. Under the terms of the
guaranty, BMO cannot exercise any recourse against us until the earlier of (i) five years from the
date of the Fourth Amendment and (ii) the termination of our existing senior lending facility or
any successor senior facility.
On October 26, 2010, Palisades XVI entered into the Fifth Amendment to the Receivables
Financing Agreement (the Fifth Amendment). The effective date of the Fifth Amendment was October
14, 2010. The Fifth Amendment (i) extends the expiration
date of the Receivables Financing Agreement to April 30, 2014, (ii) reduces the minimum
monthly total payment to $750,000, (iii) accelerates the our guarantee credit enhancement of
$8,700,000, which was paid upon execution of the Fifth Amendment, (iv) eliminates our limited
guarantee of repayment of the loans outstanding by Palisades XVI, and (v) revises the definition of
Borrowing Base Deficit, as defined in the Receivables Financing Agreement, to mean the excess, if
any, of 105% of the loans outstanding over the borrowing base.
29
In connection with the Fifth Amendment, on October 26, 2010, we entered into the Omnibus
Termination Agreement (the Termination Agreement). The limited recourse subordinated guaranty
discussed under the Fourth Amendment, was eliminated upon signing the Termination Agreement.
The aggregate minimum repayment obligations required under the Fifth Amendment including
interest and principal for fiscal years ending September 30, 2011 through 2013 are $9 million
annually and, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, is approximately $5 million (seven
months).
On December 31, 2010 and 2009, the outstanding balance on this loan was approximately
$79.3 million, and $99.7 million, respectively. The applicable interest rate at December 31, 2010
and 2009 was 3.76% and 3.77%, respectively. The average interest rate of the Receivable Financing
Agreement was 3.76% for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. We were in compliance with
all covenants at December 31, 2010.
IDB Credit Facility
The Eighth Amendment to the IDB Credit Facility, entered into on July 10, 2009, granted an
initial $40 million line of credit from a consortium of banks (the Bank Group) for portfolio
purchases and working capital and was scheduled to reduce to zero by December 31, 2009. The IDB
Credit Facility bore interest at the lesser of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or the prime rate
minus an applicable margin, based on certain leverage ratios, with a minimum rate of 5.5%. The IDB
Credit Facility was collateralized by all of our assets other than the assets of Palisades XVI and
contained financial and other covenants. The IDB Credit Facilitys commitment termination date was
December 31, 2009. This IDB facility was repaid in full on December 14, 2009.
Subordinated Debt Related Party
On April 29, 2008, the Company obtained a subordinated loan pursuant to a subordinated
promissory note from an entity ( the Family Entity) that is a greater than 5% shareholder of the
Company beneficially owned and controlled by Arthur Stern, a Director of the Company, Gary Stern,
the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and members of their families.
The loan was in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $8.2 million, bore interest at a
rate of 6.25% per annum, was payable interest only each quarter until its maturity date of January
9, 2010, subject to prior repayment in full of the IDB Credit Facility. The subordinated loan was
incurred by us to resolve certain issues related to the activities of one of the subservicers
utilized by Palisades Collection LLC under the Receivables Financing Agreement. Proceeds from the
subordinated loan were used initially to further collateralize our IDB Credit Facility and was used
to reduce the balance due on that facility as of May 31, 2008. In December 2009, the subordinated
debt-related party maturity date was extended through December 31, 2010. In addition the interest
rate was changed to 10% per annum effective January 2010. Approximately $3.8 million of the loan
was repaid in fiscal year 2010, with the remaining $4.4 million repaid during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2011, including the final payment of $2.4 million on December 30, 2010, reducing the
balance to zero.
Cash Flow
As of December 31, 2010, our cash decreased $3.2 million to $81.0 million from $84.2 million
at September 30, 2010,. The decrease was primarily the result of our debt repayment more than
offsetting our net collections during the period.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.3 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2010, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $5.0 million during the
three months ended December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net income.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $7.3 million during the three months ended December
31, 2010 as compared to $16.1 million net cash provided by investing activities for the same prior
year period. The primary reason for the decrease in cash is the lower net collections in the fiscal
2011 quarter, $21.1 million, compared to $29.4 million in the fiscal 2010 quarter. Net cash used
in financing activities was $15.8 million during the three-months ended December 31, 2010, compared
to $21.2 million during the three-months ended December 31, 2009. The change is primarily due to
the decreased repayments of debt, $15.6 million, during the three month period ended December 31,
2010, as compared to repayments of $21.4 million during the three month period ended December 31,
2009.
30
Our cash requirements have been and will continue to be significant and have, in the past,
depended on external financing to acquire consumer receivables and operate the business.
Significant requirements include repayments under our debt facilities, purchase of consumer
receivable portfolios, interest payments, costs involved in the collections of consumer
receivables, and taxes. In addition, dividends are paid if approved by the Board of Directors.
Acquisitions have been financed primarily through cash flows from operating activities and a credit
facility. We believe we will be less dependent on a credit facility in the short-term as our cash
flow from operations will be sufficient to purchase portfolios and operate the business. However,
as the collection environment remains challenging, we may seek additional financing.
We are cognizant of the current market fundamentals in the debt purchase and company
acquisition markets which, because of significant supply and tight capital availability, could
result in increased buying opportunities. Accordingly, we filed a $100 million shelf registration
statement with the SEC which was declared effective during the third quarter of 2010. As of the
date of this report, we have not issued any securities under this registration statement. The
outcome of any future transaction(s) is subject to market conditions. In addition, due to these
opportunities, we continue to work on a new and expanded loan facility.
Our business model affords us the ability to sell accounts on an opportunistic
basis; however, account sales have been immaterial in recent quarters.
The following tables summarize the changes in the balance sheet of the investment in consumer
receivables acquired for liquidation during the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Method |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
46,348,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,683,000 |
|
|
$ |
147,031,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
2,659,000 |
|
|
|
224,000 |
|
|
|
2,883,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of consumer
receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(15,579,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,371,000 |
) |
|
|
(20,950,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by account sales
of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(155,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
Finance income recognized (1) |
|
|
10,065,000 |
|
|
|
694,000 |
|
|
|
10,759,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
43,338,000 |
|
|
$ |
96,241,000 |
|
|
$ |
139,579,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $8.8 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Method |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
70,650,000 |
|
|
$ |
137,611,000 |
|
|
$ |
208,261,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
2,148,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
2,300,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of consumer
receivables acquired for liquidation (1) |
|
|
(19,047,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,786,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,833,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by account sales
of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(2,593,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,597,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
Finance income recognized (1) |
|
|
10,618,000 |
|
|
|
356,000 |
|
|
|
10,974,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
61,776,000 |
|
|
$ |
130,350,000 |
|
|
$ |
192,126,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
49.1 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $8.1 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
31
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2010, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or
financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose
entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing,
liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Additional Supplementary Information:
We do not anticipate collecting the majority of the purchased principal amounts. Accordingly,
the difference between the carrying value of the portfolios and the gross receivables is not
indicative of future revenues from these accounts acquired for liquidation. Since we purchased
these accounts at significant discounts, we anticipate collecting only a portion of the face
amounts. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, we purchased portfolios with an aggregate
purchase price of $2.9 million, having a face value of $7.6 million. The receivables purchased
during the first quarter of 2010 include litigation-related medical accounts receivable portfolio
whereby we are assigned the revenue stream. As a portion of the accounts are performing, the cost
of the portfolio is higher than the traditional charged-off non-performing assets. During the
three months ended December 31, 2009, we purchased $116.3 million of face value portfolios with an
aggregate purchase price of $2.3 million.
For additional information regarding our methods of accounting for our investment in finance
receivables, the qualitative and quantitative factors we use to determine estimated cash flows, and
our performance expectations of our portfolios, see Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies above.
Collections Represented by Account Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Represented |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
|
By Account |
|
|
Income |
|
Period |
|
Sales |
|
|
Earned |
|
Three months ended December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,597,000 |
|
|
$ |
896,000 |
|
Portfolio Performance (1)
(Interest method portfolios only)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collections |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Collections as a |
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Including Cash |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Purchase Period |
|
Price (2) |
|
|
Sales (3) |
|
|
Collections (4) |
|
|
Collections (5) |
|
|
Purchase Price |
|
2001 |
|
$ |
65,120,000 |
|
|
$ |
105,563,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
105,563,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
2002 |
|
|
36,557,000 |
|
|
|
48,164,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,164,000 |
|
|
|
132 |
% |
2003 |
|
|
115,626,000 |
|
|
|
216,066,000 |
|
|
|
384,000 |
|
|
|
216,450,000 |
|
|
|
187 |
% |
2004 |
|
|
103,743,000 |
|
|
|
185,230,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
185,430,000 |
|
|
|
179 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
126,023,000 |
|
|
|
214,159,000 |
|
|
|
4,850,000 |
|
|
|
219,009,000 |
|
|
|
174 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
163,392,000 |
|
|
|
249,785,000 |
|
|
|
10,210,000 |
|
|
|
259,995,000 |
|
|
|
159 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
109,235,000 |
|
|
|
92,696,000 |
|
|
|
22,929,000 |
|
|
|
115,625,000 |
|
|
|
106 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
26,626,000 |
|
|
|
40,469,000 |
|
|
|
1,294,000 |
|
|
|
41,763,000 |
|
|
|
157 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
19,127,000 |
|
|
|
22,068,000 |
|
|
|
8,075,000 |
|
|
|
30,143,000 |
|
|
|
158 |
% |
2010 |
|
|
7,698,000 |
|
|
|
5,497,000 |
|
|
|
5,894,000 |
|
|
|
11,391,000 |
|
|
|
148 |
% |
2011 |
|
|
2,659,000 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
3,376,000 |
|
|
|
3,457,000 |
|
|
|
130 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total collections do not represent full collections of the Company with respect to this or any other year. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase price refers to the cash paid to a seller to acquire a portfolio less the purchase price refunded by a seller due to the return of non-compliant
accounts (also defined as put-backs). |
|
(3) |
|
Net cash collections include: net collections from our third-party collection agencies and attorneys, net collections from our in-house efforts and
collections represented by account sales. |
|
(4) |
|
Does not include collections from portfolios that are zero basis. |
|
(5) |
|
Total estimated collections refer to the actual net cash collections, including cash sales, plus estimated remaining net collections. |
32
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities. ASU 2009-17 generally represents a revision to former FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and
changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is
not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. ASU 2009-17 also
requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable
interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASU
2009-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods
within the first annual reporting period. The Company adopted ASU 2009-17 as of October 1, 2010
which did not have a significant effect on its financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of business, including the
impact of interest rate changes and changes in corporate tax rates. A material change in these
rates could adversely affect our operating results and cash flows. At December 31, 2010, our
Receivable Financing Agreement, which is variable debt, had an outstanding balance of $79.3
million. A 25 basis-point increase in interest rates would have increased our interest expense for
the current quarter by approximately $52,000 based on the average debt outstanding during the
period. We do not currently invest in derivative financial or commodity instruments.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2010, we carried out the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file
or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
b. Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with our evaluation that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
33
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
In the ordinary course of our business, we are involved in numerous legal proceedings. We
regularly initiate collection lawsuits, using our network of third party law firms, against
consumers. Also, consumers occasionally initiate litigation against us, in which they allege that
we have violated a federal or state law in the process of collecting their account. We do not
believe that these ordinary course matters are material to our business and financial condition. As
of the date of this Form 10-Q, we are not involved in any material litigation in which we are a
defendant.
There were no material changes in any risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys
Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on December 14, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved) |
None.
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary Stern, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J. Michel, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary Stern, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J. Michel, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASTA FUNDING, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: February 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Gary Stern
|
|
|
|
Gary Stern, President, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: February 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Michel
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Michel, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert
J. Michel, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert
J. Michel, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
36