sv4za
As filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19,
2010
Registration
No. 333-169870
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND
MANAGEMENT COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
6798
|
|
84-1259577
|
(State of other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary standard industrial
classification code number)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES,
L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
6513
|
|
84-1275621
|
(State of other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Primary standard industrial
|
|
(IRS Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
classification code number)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
4582 South Ulster Street
Parkway, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80237
(303) 757-8101
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
John Bezzant
Senior Vice President
Apartment Investment and
Management Company
4582 South Ulster Street
Parkway, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80237
(303) 757-8101
(Name, address, including zip
code and telephone number, including area code of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Jonathan Friedman, Esq.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 687-5396
Fax: (213) 621-5396
|
|
Joseph Coco, Esq.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Four Times Square
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 735-3050
Fax: (917) 777-3050
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this
Registration Statement is declared effective and all other
conditions to the merger as described in the enclosed
information statement/prospectus are satisfied or waived.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box: o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of
1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering: o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same
offering: o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the
appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this
transaction:
Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender
Offer) o
Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender
Offer) o
The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrants will file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement will
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement will become effective on such date as the
Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
NOVEMBER 19, 2010
INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, or USRP, has
entered into an agreement and plan of merger with a wholly owned
subsidiary of Aimco Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP. Under the
merger agreement, the Aimco Subsidiary, AIMCO USRP Merger Sub
LLC, will be merged with and into USRP, with USRP as the
surviving entity. The Aimco Subsidiary was formed for the
purpose of effecting this transaction and does not have any
assets or operations. In the merger, each unit of limited
partnership interest of USRP, or each USRP Unit, will be
converted into the right to receive, at the election of the
holder of such USRP Unit, either:
|
|
|
|
|
$2.76 in cash, or
|
|
|
|
$2.76 in partnership common units of Aimco OP, or OP Units.
|
The number of OP Units offered for each USRP Unit will be
calculated by dividing $2.76 by the average closing price of
common stock of Apartment Investment and Management Company, or
Aimco, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, over the ten
consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day
immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. For
example, as of November 12, 2010, the average closing price
of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading
days was $22.15, which would have resulted in
0.12 OP Units offered for each USRP Unit. However, if
AIMCO OP determines that the law of the state or other
jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit
the issuance of OP Units in that state or other
jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that
state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such
limited partner will not be entitled to elect OP Units, and
will receive cash.
In the merger, Aimco OPs interest in the Aimco Subsidiary
will be converted into USRP Units. As a result, after the
merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of USRP and
will own all of the outstanding USRP Units.
Within ten days after the effective time of the merger, Aimco OP
will prepare and mail to you an election form pursuant to which
you can elect to receive cash or OP Units. You may elect
your form of consideration by completing and returning the
election form in accordance with its instructions. If the
information agent does not receive a properly completed election
form from you before 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the
30th day after the merger, you will be deemed to have
elected to receive cash. You may also use the election form to
elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the
appraised valued of your USRP Units, determined through an
arbitration proceeding.
In addition and separate from the merger consideration, you may
elect to receive an additional cash payment of $0.31 in exchange
for executing a waiver and release of certain claims. In order
to receive such additional payment, you must complete the
relevant section of the election form, execute the waiver and
release that is attached to the election form and return both
the election form and the executed waiver and release to the
information agent as described above.
Under Delaware law, the merger must be approved by all general
partners of USRP and a majority in interest of the USRP Units.
Both USRPs corporate general partner, U.S. Realty I
Corporation, or the Corporate General Partner, and USRPs
other general partner, Aimco OP, or the Other General Partner
(and, together with the Corporate General Partner, the General
Partners), have determined that the merger is advisable and in
the best interests of USRP and its limited partners and have
approved the merger and the merger agreement. As of
November 12, 2010, there were issued and outstanding
1,222,000 USRP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned
900,195 of those certificates, or approximately 73.67% of the
number of USRP Units outstanding. Aimco OP and its affiliates
have indicated that they intend to take action by written
consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to
approve the merger on or
about ,
2010. As a result, approval of the merger is assured, and
your consent to the merger is not required.
WE ARE
NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND
YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY
This information statement/prospectus contains information about
the merger and the securities offered hereby, and the reasons
that the general partners of USRP have decided that the merger
is in the best interests of USRP and its limited partners. The
general partners of USRP have conflicts of interest with respect
to the merger that are described in greater detail herein.
Please read this information statement/prospectus carefully,
including the section entitled Risk Factors
beginning on page 12. It provides you with detailed
information about the merger and the securities offered hereby.
The merger agreement is attached to this information
statement/prospectus as Annex A.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued in connection with the merger or
determined if this information statement/prospectus is truthful
or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
This information statement/prospectus is
dated, 2010,
and is first being mailed to limited partners on or
about ,
2010.
WE ARE CURRENTLY SEEKING QUALIFICATION TO ALLOW ALL HOLDERS
OF USRP UNITS THE ABILITY TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN
CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER. HOWEVER, AT THE PRESENT TIME, IF YOU
ARE A RESIDENT OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATES, YOU ARE NOT
PERMITTED TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MERGER:
CALIFORNIA
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW YORK
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED
ON OR ENDORSED THE MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRESENTATION
TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
This information statement/prospectus incorporates important
business and financial information about Aimco from documents
that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
but that have not been included in or delivered with this
information statement/prospectus. For a listing of documents
incorporated by reference into this information
statement/prospectus, please see Where You Can Find
Additional Information beginning on page 86 of this
information statement/prospectus.
Aimco will provide you with copies of such documents relating to
Aimco (excluding all exhibits unless Aimco has specifically
incorporated by reference an exhibit in this information
statement/prospectus), without charge, upon written or oral
request to:
ISTC
Corporation
P.O. Box 2347
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(864) 239-1029
If you have any questions or require any assistance, please
contact our information agent, Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC,
by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax
at
(908) 497-2349;
or by telephone at
(800) 217-9608.
ABOUT
THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
This information statement/prospectus, which forms a part of a
registration statement on
Form S-4
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Aimco and
Aimco OP, constitutes a prospectus of Aimco OP under
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act, with respect to the OP Units that may be
issued to holders of USRP Units in connection with the merger,
and a prospectus of Aimco under Section 5 of the Securities
Act with respect to shares of Aimco common stock that may be
issued in exchange for such OP Units tendered for
redemption by the holder thereof. This document also constitutes
an information statement under Section 14(c) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, with respect to the action to be taken by written consent
to approve the merger.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Annexes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
G-1
|
|
|
|
|
H-1
|
|
Annex I Aimco OPs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated November 19, 2010
|
|
|
I-1
|
|
EX-23.1 |
EX-23.2 |
EX-23.3 |
iii
SUMMARY
TERM SHEET
This summary term sheet highlights the material information
with respect to the merger agreement, the merger and the other
matters described herein. It may not contain all of the
information that is important to you. You are urged to carefully
read the entire information statement/prospectus and the other
documents referred to in this information statement/prospectus,
including the merger agreement. Aimco, Aimco OP, the
General Partners and Aimcos subsidiaries that may be
deemed to directly or indirectly beneficially own limited
partnership units of USRP are referred to herein, collectively,
as the Aimco Entities.
|
|
|
|
|
The Merger: USRP has entered into an
agreement and plan of merger with the Aimco Subsidiary and
Aimco OP. Under the merger agreement, at the effective time
of the merger, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into
USRP, with USRP as the surviving entity. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached as Annex A to this information
statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read the merger
agreement carefully in its entirety because it is the legal
agreement that governs the merger.
|
|
|
|
Merger Consideration: In the merger,
each USRP Unit will be converted into the right to receive, at
the election of the holder of such USRP Unit, either $2.76 in
cash or equivalent value in OP Units, except in those
jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units
(or registration would be prohibitively costly). The number of
OP Units issuable with respect to each USRP Unit will be
calculated by dividing the $2.76 per unit cash merger
consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common
stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading
days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the
consummation of the merger. For a full description of the
determination of the merger consideration, see The
Merger Determination of Merger Consideration
beginning on page 30.
|
|
|
|
Effects of the Merger: After the
merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in USRP,
and will own all of the outstanding USRP Units. As a result,
after the merger, you will cease to have any rights in USRP as a
limited partner. See Special Factors
Effects of the Merger, beginning on page 5.
|
|
|
|
Appraisal Rights: Pursuant to the terms
of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited
partner with contractual dissenters appraisal rights that
are similar to the dissenters appraisal rights available
to a stockholder of a corporation in a merger under Delaware
law, and which will enable a limited partner to obtain an
appraisal of the value of the limited partners USRP Units
in connection with the merger. See The Merger
Appraisal Rights, beginning on page 32. A description
of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that
a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached
to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.
|
|
|
|
Additional Payment for Waiver and
Release: In addition to the merger
consideration, each limited partner unaffiliated with
Aimco OP or its affiliates may elect to receive an
additional cash payment of $0.31 per USRP Unit in exchange for
executing a waiver and release of potential claims such
unaffiliated limited partner may have had in the past, may now
have or may have in the future (through and including the date
of the consummation of the merger) against USRP, the General
Partners, Aimco OP or its affiliates and certain other
persons and entities, including but not limited to claims
related to the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, but excluding claims limited partners may
have under federal securities laws. See The
Merger Waiver and Release and Additional
Consideration, beginning on page 31.
|
|
|
|
Parties Involved:
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, or USRP, is a
Delaware limited partnership formed on January 23, 1986.
USRP owns and operates one investment property, Twin Lakes
Apartments, a 262 unit apartment project located in Palm
Harbor, Florida. See Information About U.S. Realty
Partners Limited Partnership, beginning on page 25.
USRPs principal address is 55 Beattie Place,
P.O. Box 1089, Greenville, South Carolina 29602, and
its telephone number is
(864) 239-1000.
|
|
|
|
Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is a
Maryland corporation that is a self-administered and
self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, focused on
the ownership and management of quality apartment communities
located in the 20 largest markets in the United States. Aimco is
one of the largest owners and operators of apartment properties
in the United States. Aimcos
|
1
common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol
AIV. See Information about the Aimco
Entities, beginning on page 23.
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP, is a Delaware limited
partnership which, through its operating divisions and
subsidiaries, holds substantially all of Aimcos assets and
manages the daily operations of Aimcos business and
assets. See Information about the Aimco Entities,
beginning on page 23.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO USRP Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a
Delaware limited liability company formed for the purpose of
consummating the merger with USRP. The Aimco Subsidiary is a
direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Aimco OP. See
Information about the Aimco Entities, beginning on
page 23.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reasons for the Merger: Aimco and Aimco
OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing
apartment properties such as the one owned by USRP, and have
decided to proceed with the merger as a means of acquiring the
property currently owned by USRP in a manner that they believe
(i) provides fair value to limited partners,
(ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive
immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain
(except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of
OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where
registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly),
and (iii) relieves USRP of the expenses associated with a
sale of the property, including marketing and other transaction
costs. The Aimco Entities decided to proceed with the merger at
this time for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the absence of a transaction, USRP limited partners have only
limited options to liquidate their investment in USRP. The USRP
Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system,
and transactions in the securities are limited and sporadic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value of the single property owned by USRP is not sufficient
to justify its continued operation as a public company. As a
public company with a significant number of unaffiliated limited
partners, USRP incurs costs associated with preparing audited
annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial
statements, tax returns for partners on
schedule K-1,
periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities
estimate these costs to be approximately $51,000 per year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
USRP has been operating at a loss for the past
several years. Since 2007, Aimco OP has made loans of
$2,036,000 to USRP to help fund operating expenses, but it is
not willing to continue to make advances to USRP. The Aimco
Entities do not believe that USRP can obtain financing from an
independent third party. If the Aimco Entities acquire 100%
ownership of USRP, they will have greater flexibility in
financing and operating its property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairness of the Merger: Although the
Aimco Entities have interests that may conflict with those of
USRPs unaffiliated limited partners, each of the Aimco
Entities believe that the merger is fair to the unaffiliated
limited partners of USRP. See Special Factors
Fairness of the Transaction beginning on page 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts of Interest: The Corporate
General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore,
the Corporate General Partner has a conflict of interest with
respect to the merger. The Corporate General Partner has
fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., the Corporate General
Partners sole stockholder and an affiliate of Aimco, on
the one hand, and to USRP and its limited partners, on the other
hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to USRP and
its limited partners conflict with the duties of the Corporate
General Partner to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which could result in the
Corporate General Partner approving a transaction that is more
favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict
of interest. See, The Merger Conflicts of
Interest, beginning on page 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors: In evaluating the merger
agreement and the merger, USRP limited partners should carefully
read this information statement/prospectus and especially
consider the factors discussed in the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 12. Some of the
risk factors associated with the merger are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimco owns the Corporate General Partner. As a result, the
Corporate General Partner has a conflict of interest in the
merger. A transaction with a third party in the absence of this
conflict could result in better terms or greater consideration
to USRP limited partners.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
USRP limited partners who receive cash may recognize taxable
gain in the merger and that gain could exceed the merger
consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a number of significant differences between USRP Units
and Aimco OP Units relating to, among other things, the
nature of the investment, voting rights, distributions and
liquidity and transferability/redemption. For more information
regarding those differences, see Comparison of USRP Units
and Aimco OP Units, beginning on page 52.
|
|
|
|
|
|
USRP limited partners may elect to receive OP Units as
merger consideration, and there are risks related to an
investment in OP Units, including the fact that there are
restrictions on transferability of OP Units; and there is
no assurance as to the value that might be realized upon a
future redemption of OP Units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger: The merger will generally be
treated as a partnership merger for Federal income tax purposes.
In general, any payment of cash for USRP Units will be treated
as a sale of such USRP Units by such holder, and any exchange of
USRP Units for OP Units under the terms of the merger
agreement will be treated, in accordance with Sections 721
and 731 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the
Code, as a tax free transaction, except to the extent described
in Material United States Federal Income Tax
Matters Taxation of Aimco OP and
OP Unitholders United States Federal Income Tax
Consequences Relating to the Merger, beginning on
page 58.
|
The foregoing is a general discussion of the United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger. This summary does
not discuss all aspects of federal income taxation that may be
relevant to you in light of your specific circumstances or if
you are subject to special treatment under the federal income
tax laws. The particular tax consequences of the merger to you
will depend on a number of factors related to your tax
situation. You should review Material United States
Federal Income Tax Matters, herein and consult your tax
advisors for a full understanding of the tax consequences to you
of the merger.
3
SPECIAL
FACTORS
Purposes,
Alternatives and Reasons for the Merger
Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and
managing apartment properties such as the one owned by USRP, and
have decided to proceed with the merger as a means of acquiring
the property currently owned by USRP in a manner that they
believe (i) provides fair value to limited partners,
(ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive
immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain
(except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of
OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where
registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly),
and (iii) relieves USRP of the expenses associated with a
sale of the property, including marketing and other transaction
costs.
The Aimco Entities decided to proceed with the merger at this
time for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
In the absence of a transaction, USRP limited partners have only
limited options to liquidate their investment in USRP. The USRP
Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system,
and transactions in the securities are limited and sporadic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value of the single property owned by USRP is not sufficient
to justify its continued operation as a public company. As a
public company with a significant number of unaffiliated limited
partners, USRP incurs costs associated with preparing audited
annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial
statements, tax returns for partners on
schedule K-1,
periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities
estimate these costs to be approximately $51,000 per year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
USRP has been operating at a loss for the past
several years. Since 2007, Aimco OP has made loans of
$2,036,000 to USRP to help fund operating expenses, but it is
not willing to continue to make advances to USRP. The Aimco
Entities do not believe that USRP can obtain additional
financing from an independent third party. If the Aimco Entities
acquire 100% ownership of USRP, they will have greater
flexibility in financing and operating its property.
|
Before deciding to proceed with the merger, the Corporate
General Partner and the other Aimco Entities considered the
alternatives described below:
Continuation of USRP as a Public Company Operating the
Property. As discussed above, the Corporate
General Partner and the Aimco Entities did not consider this a
viable alternative primarily because of the costs associated
with preparing financial statements, tax returns, periodic SEC
reports and other expenses, and the inability of USRP to
generate sufficient funds to cover operating expenses without
advances from Aimco OP which would not be available in the
future.
Liquidation of USRP. The Corporate General
Partner and the other Aimco Entities considered a liquidation of
USRP in which USRPs property would be marketed and sold to
a third party for cash, with any net proceeds remaining, after
payment of all liabilities, distributed to USRPs limited
partners. The primary advantage of such a transaction would be
that the sale price would reflect arms-length negotiations
and might therefore be higher than the appraised value which has
been used to determine the merger consideration. The Corporate
General Partner and the other Aimco Entities rejected this
alternative because of: (i) the risk that a third party
purchaser might not be found that would offer a satisfactory
price; (ii) the costs that USRP would incur in connection
with marketing and selling the property; (iii) the fact
that limited partners would recognize taxable gain on the sale;
and (iv) the prepayment penalties that USRP would incur in
repaying its mortgage debt upon a sale of the property.
Contribution of the property to Aimco OP. The
Aimco Entities considered a transaction in which USRPs
property would be contributed to Aimco OP in exchange for
OP Units. The primary advantage of such a transaction would
be that USRP limited partners would not recognize taxable gain.
The Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because it would
not offer an opportunity for immediate liquidity to those
limited partners who desire it.
4
Effects
of the Merger
The Aimco Entities believe that the merger will have the
following benefits and detriments to unaffiliated limited
partners, USRP and the Aimco Entities:
Benefits to Unaffiliated Limited Partners. The
merger is expected to have the following principal benefits to
unaffiliated limited partners:
Option to Defer Taxable Gain. Limited
partners are given a choice of merger consideration, and may
elect to receive either cash or OP Units in the merger,
except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer
of OP Units (or registration would be prohibitively
costly). Limited partners who receive OP Units in the
merger may defer recognition of taxable gain.
Liquidity. Limited partners who receive
the cash consideration will receive immediate liquidity with
respect to their investment.
Diversification. Limited partners who
receive OP Units in the merger will have the opportunity to
participate in Aimco OP, which has a more diversified property
portfolio than USRP.
Benefits to USRP. The merger is expected to
have the following principal benefits to USRP:
Elimination of Costs Associated with SEC Reporting
Requirements and Multiple Limited
Partners. After the merger, the Aimco
Entities will own all of the interests in USRP, and USRP will
terminate its registration and cease filing periodic reports
with the SEC. As a result, USRP will no longer incur costs
associated with preparing audited annual financial statements,
unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns for
partners on
schedule K-1,
periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities
estimate these expenses to be approximately $51,000 per year.
Benefits to the Aimco Entities. The merger is
expected to have the following principal benefits to the Aimco
Entities:
Increased Interest in USRP. Upon
completion of the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited
partner of USRP. As a result, the Aimco Entities will receive
all of the benefit from any future appreciation in value of the
property after the merger, and any future property income.
Detriments to Unaffiliated Limited
Partners. The merger is expected to have the
following principal detriments to unaffiliated limited partners:
Taxable Gain. Limited partners who
receive cash consideration may recognize taxable gain in the
merger and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.
Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger could
recognize taxable gain if Aimco subsequently sells the property.
Risks Related to OP Units. Limited
partners who receive OP Units in the merger will be subject
to the risks related to an investment in OP Units, as
described in greater detail under the heading Risk
Factors Risks Related to an Investment in
OP Units.
Conflicts of Interest; No Separate Representation of
Unaffiliated Limited Partners. The Corporate
General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore,
the Corporate General Partner has a conflict of interest with
respect to the merger. The Corporate General Partner has
fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., the Corporate General
Partners sole stockholder and an affiliate of Aimco, on
the one hand, and to USRP and its limited partners, on the other
hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to USRP and
its limited partners conflict with the duties of the Corporate
General Partner to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which could result in the
Corporate General Partner approving a transaction that is more
favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict
of interest. In negotiating the merger agreement, no one
separately represented the interests of the unaffiliated limited
partners. If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is
possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms
for USRPs unaffiliated limited partners.
Detriments to USRP. The merger is not expected
to have any detriments to USRP.
5
Detriments to the Aimco Entities. The merger
is expected to have the following principal detriments to the
Aimco Entities:
Increased Interest in USRP. Upon
completion of the merger, the Aimco Entities interest in
the net book value of USRP will increase from 73.7% to 100%, or
from a deficit of $3,734,000 to a deficit of $5,064,000 as of
December 31, 2009, and their interest in the net losses of
USRP will increase from 74.0% to 100%, or from $404,000 to
$546,000 for the period ended December 31, 2009. As a
result, Aimco OP will bear the burden of all future operating or
other losses, as well as any decline in the value of USRPs
property.
Burden of Capital Expenditures. Upon
completion of the merger, the Aimco Entities will have sole
responsibility for providing any funds necessary to pay for
capital expenditures at the property.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
For a discussion of the material United States federal income
tax consequences of the merger, see Material United States
Federal Income Tax Matters United States Federal
Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Merger.
Fairness
of the Transaction
Factors in Favor of Fairness
Determination. The Aimco Entities (including the
Corporate General Partner) believe that the merger is fair and
in the best interests of USRP and its unaffiliated limited
partners. In support of such determination, the Aimco Entities
considered the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration of $2.76 per USRP Unit was based on an
independent third party appraisal of USRPs property by
CRA, an independent valuation firm.
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration is equal to the Aimco Entities
estimate of going concern value, calculated as the appraised
value of USRPs property, plus the amount of its other
assets, less the amount of USRPs liabilities, including
mortgage debt (but without deducting any prepayment penalties
thereon).
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration is greater than the Aimco
Entities estimate of liquidation value because there was
no deduction for certain amounts that would be payable upon an
immediate sale of the property, such as prepayment penalties on
the mortgage debt, currently estimated to be $2,892,958.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration exceeds the net book value per unit (a
deficit of $4.43 per USRP Unit at September 30, 2010).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners may defer recognition of taxable gain by
electing to receive OP Units in the merger, except in those
jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units
(or registration would be prohibitively costly).
|
|
|
|
The number of OP Units issuable to limited partners in the
merger will be determined based on the average closing price of
Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten
consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day
immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Limited partners who receive cash consideration will achieve
immediate liquidity with respect to their investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger will
have the opportunity to participate in Aimco OP, which has a
more diversified property portfolio than USRP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although limited partners are not entitled to dissenters
appraisal rights under Delaware law, the merger agreement
provides them with contractual dissenters appraisal rights
that are similar to the dissenters appraisal rights that
are available to stockholders in a corporate merger under
Delaware law.
|
|
|
|
Although the merger agreement may be terminated by either side
at any time, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary are very likely
to complete the merger on a timely basis.
|
|
|
|
Unlike a typical property sale agreement, the merger agreement
contains no indemnification provisions, so there is no risk of
subsequent reduction of the proceeds.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
In contrast to a sale of the property to a third party, which
would involve marketing and other transaction costs, Aimco OP
has agreed to pay all expenses associated with the merger.
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration is greater than some of the prices at
which USRP Units have historically sold in the secondary market
($1.20 to $4.50 per USRP Unit from January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2009).
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration is greater than the prices at which
USRP Units have recently sold in the secondary market ($1.00 per
USRP Unit from January 1, 2010 through July 31, 2010).
|
Factors Not in Favor of Fairness
Determination. In addition to the foregoing
factors, the Aimco Entities also considered the following
countervailing factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate General Partner has substantial conflicts of
interest with respect to the merger as a result of (i) the
fiduciary duties it owes to unaffiliated limited partners, who
have an interest in receiving the highest possible
consideration, and (ii) the fiduciary duties it owes to its
sole stockholder, a subsidiary of Aimco, which has an interest
in obtaining the USRP property for the lowest possible
consideration.
|
|
|
|
The terms of the merger were not approved by any independent
directors.
|
|
|
|
An unaffiliated representative was not retained to act solely on
behalf of the unaffiliated limited partners for purposes of
negotiating the merger agreement on an independent,
arms-length basis, which might have resulted in better
terms for the unaffiliated limited partners.
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement does not require the approval of any
unaffiliated limited partners.
|
|
|
|
No opinion has been obtained from an independent financial
advisor that the merger is fair to the unaffiliated limited
partners.
|
|
|
|
The merger consideration is less than some of the prices at
which USRP Units have historically sold in the secondary market
($1.20 to $4.50 per USRP Unit from June 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2009).
|
|
|
|
Limited partners who receive cash consideration in the merger
may recognize taxable gain and that gain could exceed the merger
consideration.
|
|
|
|
Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger could
recognize taxable gain if Aimco subsequently sells the property.
|
|
|
|
Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger will be
subject to the risks related to an investment in OP Units,
as described in greater detail under the heading Risk
Factors Risks Related to an Investment in
OP Units.
|
|
|
|
CRA, the valuation firm that appraised the USRP property, has
performed work for Aimco OP and its affiliates in the past and
this pre-existing relationship could negatively impact
CRAs independence.
|
The Aimco Entities did not assign relative weights to the above
factors in reaching their decision that the merger is fair to
USRP and its unaffiliated limited partners. However, in
determining that the benefits of the proposed merger outweigh
the costs and risks, they relied primarily on the following
factors: (i) the merger consideration of $2.76 per USRP
Unit is based on independent third party appraisal of
USRPs property, (ii) limited partners may defer
recognition of taxable gain by electing to receive OP Units
in the merger (except in certain jurisdictions) and
(iii) limited partners are entitled to contractual
dissenters appraisal rights. The Aimco Entities were aware
of, but did not place much emphasis on, information regarding
prices at which USRP Units may have sold in the secondary market
because they do not view that information as a reliable measure
of value. The USRP Units are not traded on an exchange or other
reporting system, and transactions in the secondary market are
very limited and sporadic.
Procedural Fairness. The Aimco Entities
determined that the merger is fair from a procedural standpoint
despite the absence of any customary procedural safeguards, such
as the engagement of an unaffiliated representative, the
approval of independent directors or approval by a majority of
unaffiliated limited partners. In making this determination, the
Aimco Entities relied primarily on the dissenters
appraisal rights provided to unaffiliated
7
limited partners under the merger agreement that are similar to
the dissenters appraisal rights available to stockholders
in a corporate merger under Delaware law.
The
Appraisal
Selection and Qualifications of Independent
Appraiser. The Corporate General Partner retained
the services of CRA to appraise the market value of USRPs
property. CRA is an experienced independent valuation consulting
firm that has performed appraisal services for Aimco OP and its
affiliates in the past. Aimco OP believes that its relationship
with CRA had no negative impact on its independence in
conducting the appraisal related to the merger.
Factors Considered. CRA performed a complete
appraisal of Twin Lakes Apartments. CRA has represented that its
reports were prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards
of Professional Appraisal Practice, as promulgated by the
Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and the
Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. USRP furnished
CRA with all of the necessary information requested by CRA in
connection with the appraisal. The appraisal was not prepared in
conjunction with a request for a specific value or a value
within a given range or predicated upon loan approval. In
preparing its valuation of the property, CRA, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
Inspected the property and its environs;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed demographic and other socioeconomic trends pertaining
to the city and region where the property is located;
|
|
|
|
Examined regional apartment market conditions, with special
emphasis on the propertys apartment submarket;
|
|
|
|
Investigated lease and sale transactions involving comparable
properties in the influencing market;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the existing rent roll and discussed the leasing status
with the building manager and leasing agent. In addition, CRA
reviewed the propertys recent operating history and those
of competing properties;
|
|
|
|
Utilized appropriate appraisal methodology to derive estimates
of value; and
|
|
|
|
Reconciled the estimates of value into a single value conclusion.
|
Summary of Approaches and Methodologies
Employed. The following summary describes the
approaches and analyses employed by CRA in preparing the
appraisal. CRA principally relied on two approaches to
valuation: (i) the income capitalization approach and
(ii) the sales comparison approach.
The income capitalization approach is based on the premise that
value is derived by converting anticipated benefits into
property value. Anticipated benefits include the present value
of the net income and the present value of the net proceeds
resulting from the re-sale of the property. CRA reported that
the property has an adequate operations history to determine its
income-producing capabilities over the near future. In addition,
performance levels of competitive properties served as an
adequate check as to the reasonableness of the propertys
actual performance. As such, the income capitalization approach
was utilized in the appraisal of the property.
As part of the income capitalization approach, CRA used the
direct capitalization method to estimate a value for Twin Lakes
Apartments. According to CRAs report, the basic steps in
the direct capitalization analysis to valuing the property are
as follows: (i) calculate potential gross income from all
sources that a competent owner could legally generate;
(ii) estimate and deduct an appropriate vacancy and
collection loss factor to arrive at effective gross income;
(iii) estimate and deduct operating expenses that would be
expected during a stabilized year to arrive at a probable net
operating income; (iv) develop an appropriate overall
capitalization rate to apply to the net operating income; and
(v) estimate value by dividing the net operating income by
the overall capitalization rate. In addition, any adjustments to
account for differences between the current conditions and
stabilized conditions are also considered. The assumptions
utilized by CRA with respect to the property are set forth
below. The property-specific assumptions were determined by CRA
to be reasonable based on its review of historical operating and
financial data for the property and comparison of said data to
the operating statistics of similar properties in the
influencing market area. The capitalization rate for each
property was determined to be reasonable by CRA based on their
review of applicable data ascertained within the market in which
the property is located.
8
The sales comparison approach is an estimate of value based upon
a process of comparing recent sales of similar properties in the
surrounding or competing areas to the subject property. Inherent
in and central to this approach is the principle of
substitution. This comparative process involves judgment as to
the similarity of the subject property and the comparable sales
with respect to many value factors such as location, contract
rent levels, quality of construction, reputation and prestige,
age and condition, and the interest transferred, among others.
The value estimated through this approach represents the
probable price at which the subject property would be sold by a
willing seller to a willing and knowledgeable buyer as of the
date of value. The reliability of this technique is dependent
upon the availability of comparable sales data, the verification
of the sales data, the degree of comparability and extent of
adjustment necessary for differences, and the absence of
atypical conditions affecting the individual sales prices. CRA
reported that, although the volume of sales activity is down as
a result of market conditions, its research revealed adequate
sales activity to form a reasonable estimation of the subject
propertys market value pursuant to the sales comparison
approach. In the appraisal, numerous sales were uncovered and
the specific sales included in the appraisal report were deemed
representative of the most comparable data available at the time
the appraisal was prepared. Important criteria utilized in
selecting the most comparable data included: conditions under
which the sale occurred (i.e. seller and buyer were typically
motivated); date of sale every attempt was made to
utilize recent sales transactions; sales were selected based on
their physical similarity to the appraised property;
transactions were selected based on the similarity of location
between the comparable and appraised property; and, similarity
of economic characteristics between the comparable and appraised
property. Sales data that may have been uncovered during the
course of research that was not included in the appraisal did
not meet the described criteria
and/or could
not be adequately confirmed.
According to CRAs report, the basic steps in processing
the sales comparison approach are outlined as follows:
(i) research the market for recent sales transactions,
listings, and offers to purchase or sell of properties similar
to the subject property; (ii) select a relevant unit of
comparison and develop a comparative analysis;
(iii) compare comparable sale properties with the subject
property using the elements of comparison and adjust the price
of each comparable to the subject property; and
(iv) reconcile the various value indications produced by
the analysis of the comparables.
The final step in the appraisal process is the reconciliation of
the value indicators into a single final estimate. CRA reviewed
each approach in order to determine its appropriateness relative
to the property. The accuracy of the data available and the
quantity of evidence were weighted in each approach. For the
appraisal of Twin Lakes Apartments, CRA relied principally on
the income capitalization approach to valuation, and the direct
capitalization method was given greatest consideration in the
conclusion of value under this approach. CRA relied secondarily
on the sales comparison approach, and reported that the value
conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach is
supportive of the conclusion derived pursuant to the income
capitalization approach.
Summary of Independent Appraisal of Twin Lakes
Apartments. CRA performed a complete appraisal of
Twin Lakes Apartments. The appraisal report of Twin Lakes
Apartments is dated May 21, 2010, and provides an estimate
of the propertys market value as of April 26, 2010.
The summary set forth below describes the material conclusions
reached by CRA based on the value determined under the valuation
approaches and subject to the assumptions and limitations
described below. According to CRAs report, the estimated
aggregate market value of Twin Lakes Apartments is $15,900,000
as of April 26, 2010. The following is a summary of the
appraisal report dated May 21, 2010:
Valuation Under Income Capitalization
Approach. Using the income capitalization
approach, CRA performed a direct capitalization analysis to
derive a value for Twin Lakes Apartments.
The direct capitalization analysis resulted in a valuation
conclusion for Twin Lakes Apartments of approximately
$15,900,000.
The assumptions employed by CRA to determine the value of Twin
Lakes Apartments under the income capitalization approach using
a direct capitalization analysis included:
|
|
|
|
|
potential gross income from apartment unit rentals of $214,488
per month or $2,573,856 for the appraised year;
|
|
|
|
no allowance attributable to loss for lease;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
rent concessions of 4.0% of the gross rent potential;
|
|
|
|
a combined vacancy and collection loss allowance of 7.0%;
|
|
|
|
estimated utility recovery of $715 per unit in 2010;
|
|
|
|
other income of $600 per unit for the appraised fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
projected total expenses (including reserves) of $1,363,258;
|
|
|
|
capitalization rate of 8.0%.
|
Using a direct capitalization analysis, CRA calculated the value
of Twin Lakes Apartments by dividing the stabilized net
operating income (including an allowance for reserves) by the
concluded capitalization rate of 8.0%.
CRA calculated the value conclusion of Twin Lakes Apartments
under the income capitalization approach of approximately
$15,900,000 as of April 26, 2010.
Valuation Under Sales Comparison Approach. CRA
estimated the property value of Twin Lakes Apartments under the
sales comparison approach by analyzing sales from the
influencing market that were most similar to Twin Lakes
Apartments in terms of age, size, tenant profile and location.
CRA reported that adequate sales existed to formulate a
defensible value for Twin Lakes Apartments under the sales
comparison approach.
The sales comparison approach resulted in a valuation conclusion
for Twin Lakes Apartments of approximately $15,500,000.
In reaching a valuation conclusion for Twin Lakes Apartments,
CRA examined and analyzed comparable sales of five properties in
the influencing market. The sales reflected unadjusted sales
prices ranging from $42,460 to $71,759 per unit. After
adjustment, the comparable sales illustrated a value range of
$55,198 to $60,995 per unit, with mean and median adjusted sale
prices of $58,761 and $59,018 per unit, respectively. CRA
reported that three of the comparable sales required the least
adjustment and were accorded most significance in the analysis,
and that the adjusted sales prices for these properties ranged
from $58,594 to $60,000 per unit. CRA estimated a value of
$59,000 per unit for Twin Lakes Apartments. Applied to Twin
Lakes Apartments 262 units, this resulted in
CRAs total value estimate for Twin Lakes Apartments of
approximately $15,500,000.
CRA also performed an EGIM analysis, which resulted in an
indicated EGIM of approximately 5.9 on a stabilized basis. The
EGIM (Effective Gross Income Multiplier) is the ratio of the
sale price of a property to its effective gross income at the
time of sale. The EGIM is used to compare the income-producing
characteristics of properties. In the appraisal, the indicated
EGIM for the appraised property, calculated by dividing the
value concluded for the appraised property via the sale
comparison approach by its projected effective gross income, was
compared to the EGIMs produced by the sales data. In the
appraisal, the appraised propertys indicated EGIM was
aligned toward the middle of the range exhibited by the most
recent transactions (5.4 to 6.4 with an average of 5.8), which
is considered reasonable. CRA reported that the indicator
suggested that the value concluded for the property via
comparative analysis was reasonable based on the
income-producing characteristics of Twin Lakes Apartments.
Reconciliation of Values and Conclusion of
Appraisal. For the appraisal of Twin Lakes
Apartments, CRA relied principally on the income capitalization
approach to valuation, and the direct capitalization method was
given greatest consideration in the conclusion of value under
this approach. CRA relied secondarily on the sales comparison
approach, and reported that the value conclusion derived
pursuant to the sales comparison approach was supportive of the
conclusion derived pursuant to the income capitalization
approach. The income capitalization approach using a direct
capitalization method resulted in a value of $15,900,000, and
the sales comparison approach resulted in a value of
$15,500,000. CRA concluded that the market value of Twin Lakes
Apartments as of April 26, 2010 was $15,900,000.
Assumptions, Limitations and Qualifications of CRAs
Valuation. CRAs appraisal report was
subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: no
responsibility was assumed for the legal description or for
matters including legal or title considerations, and title to
the property was assumed to be good and marketable unless
otherwise stated; the property was appraised free and clear of
any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated;
responsible ownership and competent property management were
assumed; the information
10
furnished by others was believed to be reliable, and no warranty
was given by CRA for the accuracy of such information; all
engineering was assumed to be correct; there were no hidden or
unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures
that render it more or less valuable, and no responsibility was
assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering
studies that may be required to discover them; there was full
compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local
environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance was
stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all
applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been
complied with, unless nonconformity had been stated, defined,
and considered in the appraisal report; all required licenses,
certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or
administrative authority from any local, state, or national
government or private entity or organization have been or can be
obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate
contained in the appraisal report was based; the utilization of
the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property
lines of the property described and there is no encroachment or
trespass unless noted in the appraisal report; the distribution,
if any, of the total valuation in the appraisal report between
land and improvements applies only under the stated program of
utilization; unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report,
the existence of hazardous substances, including without
limitation, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum
leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be
present on the property, or other environmental conditions, were
not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become
aware of such during the appraisers inspection, and the
appraiser had no knowledge of the existence of such materials on
or in the property unless otherwise stated; the appraiser has
not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the
property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with
the various detailed requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act; and former personal property items such as
kitchen and bathroom appliances were, at the time of the
appraisal report, either permanently affixed to the real estate
or were implicitly part of the real estate in that tenants
expected the use of such items in exchange for rent and never
gained any of the rights of ownership, and the intention of the
owners was not to remove the articles which are required under
the implied or express warranty of habitability.
Compensation of Appraiser. CRAs fee for
the appraisal was approximately $6,862. Aimco OP paid for the
costs of the appraisal. In addition to the appraisal performed
in connection with the merger, during the prior two years, CRA
has been paid approximately $106,931 for appraisal services by
Aimco OP and its affiliates. Except as set forth above, during
the prior two years, no material relationship has existed
between CRA and USRP or Aimco OP or any of their affiliates.
Aimco OP believes that its relationship with CRA had no negative
impact on its independence in conducting the appraisals.
Availability of Appraisal Reports. You may
obtain a full copy of CRAs appraisal upon request, without
charge, by contacting Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at
12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at
(908) 497-2349;
or by telephone at
(800) 217-9608.
In addition, the appraisal report has been filed with the SEC.
For more information about how to obtain a copy of the appraisal
report see Where You Can Find Additional Information.
11
RISK
FACTORS
Risks
Related to the Merger
Conflicts of Interest. The Corporate General
Partner is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. Therefore, it has a
conflict of interest with respect to the merger. The Corporate
General Partner has fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder,
which is wholly owned by Aimco, on the one hand, and to USRP and
its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the
Corporate General Partner to USRP and its limited partners
conflict with its duties to its sole stockholder, which could
result in the Corporate General Partner approving a transaction
that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent
such conflict of interest. The Corporate General Partners
desire to seek the best possible terms for USRPs limited
partners conflicts with Aimcos interest in obtaining the
best possible terms for Aimco OP.
No independent representative was engaged to represent the
unaffiliated limited partners in negotiating the terms of the
merger. If an independent advisor had been
engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated
better terms for USRPs unaffiliated limited partners.
The terms of the merger have not been determined in
arms-length negotiations. The terms of the
merger, including the merger consideration, were determined
through discussions between officers and directors of the
Corporate General Partner, on the one hand, and officers of
Aimco, on the other. All of the officers and directors of the
Corporate General Partner are also officers of Aimco. There are
no independent directors of the Corporate General Partner. If
the terms of the merger had been determined through
arms-length negotiations, the terms might be more
favorable to USRP and its limited partners.
The merger agreement does not require approval of the merger
by a majority of the unaffiliated limited
partners. Under the provisions of the USRP
partnership agreement and applicable Delaware law, the merger
must be approved by a majority in interest of the USRP Units. As
of November 12, 2010, Aimco OP and its affiliates owned
approximately 73.67% of the outstanding USRP Units, enabling
them to approve the merger without the consent or approval of
any unaffiliated limited partners.
Alternative valuations of USRPs property might exceed
the appraised value relied on to determine the merger
consideration. Aimco determined the merger
consideration in reliance on the appraised value of USRPs
property. See, Special Factors The
Appraisal, beginning on page 8, for more information
about the appraisal. Although an independent appraiser was
engaged to perform a complete appraisal of the property,
valuation is not an exact science. There are a number of other
methods available to value real estate, each of which may result
in different valuations of a property. Also, others using the
same valuation methodology could make different assumptions and
judgments, and obtain different results. As of
September 30, 2010, Aimco internally valued Twin Lakes
Apartments at $16,500,000.
The actual sales price of USRPs property could exceed
the appraised value that Aimco relied on to determine the merger
consideration. No recent attempt has been made to
market Twin Lakes Apartments to unaffiliated third parties.
There can be no assurance that Twin Lakes Apartments could not
be sold for a value higher than the appraised value used to
determine the merger consideration if it was marketed to
third-party buyers interested in a property of this type.
The merger consideration may not represent the price limited
partners could obtain for their USRP Units in an open
market. There is no established or regular
trading market for USRP Units, nor is there another reliable
standard for determining the fair market value of the USRP
Units. The merger consideration does not necessarily reflect the
price that USRP limited partners would receive in an open market
for their USRP Units. Such prices could be higher than the
aggregate value of the merger consideration.
No opinion has been obtained from an independent financial
advisor that the merger is fair to unaffiliated limited
partners. While the Corporate General Partner and
each of the other Aimco Entities believes that the terms of the
merger are fair to USRP limited partners unaffiliated with the
Corporate General Partner or Aimco for the reasons discussed in
Special Factors Fairness of the
Transaction, beginning on page 6, no opinion has been
obtained as to whether the merger is fair to the limited
partners of USRP unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner
or Aimco from a financial point of view.
12
Limited partners may recognize taxable gain in the merger,
and that gain could exceed the merger
consideration. Limited partners who elect to
receive cash in the merger will recognize gain or loss equal to
the difference between their amount realized and
their adjusted tax basis in the USRP Units sold. The resulting
tax liability could exceed the value of the cash received in the
merger.
Limited partners in certain jurisdictions will not be able to
elect OP Units. In those states or
jurisdictions where the issuance of the OP Units hereby is
not permitted (or the registration or qualification of
OP Units in that state or jurisdiction would be
prohibitively costly), residents of those states will receive
only the cash consideration in the merger.
Risks
Related to an Investment in Aimco or Aimco OP
For a description of risks related to an investment in Aimco and
Aimco OP, please see the information set forth under
Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors
in the Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 of each of Aimco and
Aimco OP. Aimcos Annual Report is incorporated herein by
reference and is available electronically through the SECs
website, www.sec.gov, or by request to Aimco. Aimco OPs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (excluding the report
of the independent registered public accounting firm, the
financial statements and the notes thereto) is included as
Annex G to this information statement/prospectus.
Risks
Related to an Investment in OP Units
There are restrictions on the ability to transfer
OP Units, and there is no public market for Aimco
OP Units. The Aimco OP partnership agreement
restricts the transferability of OP Units. Until the
expiration of a one-year holding period, subject to certain
exceptions, investors may not transfer OP Units without the
consent of Aimco OPs general partner. Thereafter,
investors may transfer such OP Units subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, including the general
partners right of first refusal. There is no public market
for the OP Units. Aimco OP has no plans to list any
OP Units on a securities exchange. It is unlikely that any
person will make a market in the OP Units, or that an
active market for the OP Units will develop. If a market
for the OP Units develops and the OP Units are
considered readily tradable on a secondary
market (or the substantial equivalent thereof), Aimco OP
would be classified as a publicly traded partnership for United
States Federal income tax purposes, which could have a material
adverse effect on Aimco OP.
Cash distributions by Aimco OP are not guaranteed and may
fluctuate with partnership performance. Aimco OP
makes quarterly distributions to holders of OP Units (on a
per unit basis) that generally are equal to dividends paid on
the Aimco common stock (on a per share basis). However, such
distributions will not necessarily continue to be equal to such
dividends. Although Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions on
its OP Units, there can be no assurance regarding the
amounts of available cash that Aimco OP will generate or the
portion that its general partner will choose to distribute. The
actual amounts of available cash will depend upon numerous
factors, including profitability of operations, required
principal and interest payments on our debt, the cost of
acquisitions (including related debt service payments), its
issuance of debt and equity securities, fluctuations in working
capital, capital expenditures, adjustments in reserves,
prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other
factors, some of which may be beyond Aimco OPs control.
Cash distributions depend primarily on cash flow, including from
reserves, and not on profitability, which is affected by
non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions may be made during
periods when Aimco OP records losses and may not be made during
periods when it records profits. The Aimco OP partnership
agreement gives the general partner discretion in establishing
reserves for the proper conduct of the partnerships
business that will affect the amount of available cash. Aimco is
required to make reserves for the future payment of principal
and interest under its credit facilities and other indebtedness.
In addition, Aimco OPs credit facility limits its ability
to distribute cash to holders of OP Units. As a result of
these and other factors, there can be no assurance regarding
actual levels of cash distributions on OP Units, and Aimco
OPs ability to distribute cash may be limited during the
existence of any events of default under any of its debt
instruments.
Holders of OP Units are limited in their ability to
effect a change of control. The limited partners
of Aimco OP are unable to remove the general partner of Aimco OP
or to vote in the election of Aimcos directors unless they
own shares of Aimco. In order to comply with specific REIT tax
requirements, Aimcos charter has restrictions on
13
the ownership of its equity securities. As a result, Aimco OP
limited partners and Aimco stockholders are limited in their
ability to effect a change of control of Aimco OP and Aimco,
respectively.
Holders of OP Units have limited voting
rights. Aimco OP is managed and operated by its
general partner. Unlike the holders of common stock in a
corporation, holders of OP Units have only limited voting
rights on matters affecting Aimco OPs business. Such
matters relate to certain amendments of the partnership
agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of
bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of
creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its
interest in Aimco OP or the admission of a successor general
partner. Holders of OP Units have no right to elect the
general partner on an annual or other continuing basis, or to
remove the general partner. As a result, holders of
OP Units have limited influence on matters affecting the
operation of Aimco OP, and third parties may find it difficult
to attempt to gain control over, or influence the activities of,
Aimco OP.
Holders of OP Units are subject to
dilution. Aimco OP may issue an unlimited number
of additional OP Units or other securities for such
consideration and on such terms as it may establish, without the
approval of the holders of OP Units. Such securities could
have priority over the OP Units as to cash flow,
distributions and liquidation proceeds. The effect of any such
issuance may be to dilute the interests of holders of
OP Units.
Holders of OP Units may not have limited liability in
specific circumstances. The limitations on the
liability of limited partners for the obligations of a limited
partnership have not been clearly established in some states. If
it were determined that Aimco OP had been conducting business in
any state without compliance with the applicable limited
partnership statute, or that the right or the exercise of the
right by the OP Unitholders as a group to make specific
amendments to the agreement of limited partnership or to take
other action under the agreement of limited partnership
constituted participation in the control of Aimco
OPs business, then a holder of OP Units could be held
liable under specific circumstances for Aimco OPs
obligations to the same extent as the general partner.
Aimco may have conflicts of interest with holders of
OP Units. Conflicts of interest have arisen
and could arise in the future as a result of the relationships
between the general partner of Aimco OP and its affiliates
(including Aimco), on the one hand, and Aimco OP or any partner
thereof, on the other. The directors and officers of the general
partner have fiduciary duties to manage the general partner in a
manner beneficial to Aimco, as the sole stockholder of the
general partner. At the same time, as the general partner of
Aimco OP, it has fiduciary duties to manage Aimco OP in a manner
beneficial to Aimco OP and its limited partners. The duties of
the general partner of Aimco OP to Aimco OP and its partners may
therefore come into conflict with the duties of the directors
and officers of the general partner to its sole stockholder,
Aimco. Such conflicts of interest might arise in the following
situations, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
Decisions of the general partner with respect to the amount and
timing of cash expenditures, borrowings, issuances of additional
interests and reserves in any quarter will affect whether or the
extent to which there is available cash to make distributions in
a given quarter.
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, Aimco OP
will reimburse the general partner and its affiliates for costs
incurred in managing and operating Aimco OP, including
compensation of officers and employees.
|
|
|
|
Whenever possible, the general partner seeks to limit Aimco
OPs liability under contractual arrangements to all or
particular assets of Aimco OP, with the other party thereto
having no recourse against the general partner or its assets.
|
|
|
|
Any agreements between Aimco OP and the general partner and its
affiliates will not grant to the OP Unitholders, separate
and apart from Aimco OP, the right to enforce the obligations of
the general partner and such affiliates in favor of Aimco OP.
Therefore, the general partner, in its capacity as the general
partner of Aimco OP, will be primarily responsible for enforcing
such obligations.
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the
general partner is not restricted from causing Aimco OP to pay
the general partner or its affiliates for any services rendered
on terms that are fair and reasonable to Aimco OP or entering
into additional contractual arrangements with any of such
entities on behalf of Aimco OP. Neither the Aimco OP partnership
agreement nor any of the other agreements, contracts and
arrangements between Aimco OP, on the one hand, and the general
partner of Aimco OP and its affiliates, on the other, are or
will be the result of arms-length negotiations.
|
14
Provisions in the Aimco OP partnership agreement may limit
the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge actions
taken by the general partner. Delaware law
provides that, except as provided in a partnership agreement, a
general partner owes the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to
the partnership and its limited partners. The Aimco OP
partnership agreement expressly authorizes the general partner
to enter into, on behalf of Aimco OP, a right of first
opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance agreements
with various affiliates of Aimco OP and the general partner, on
such terms as the general partner, in its sole and absolute
discretion, believes are advisable. The latitude given in the
Aimco OP partnership agreement to the general partner in
resolving conflicts of interest may significantly limit the
ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge what might
otherwise be a breach of fiduciary duty. The general partner
believes, however, that such latitude is necessary and
appropriate to enable it to serve as the general partner of
Aimco OP without undue risk of liability.
The Aimco OP partnership agreement limits the liability of the
general partner for actions taken in good faith. Aimco OPs
partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the
general partner by providing that the general partner, and its
officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in
damages to Aimco OP, the limited partners or assignees for
errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or
omission if the general partner or such director or officer
acted in good faith. In addition, Aimco OP is required to
indemnify the general partner, its affiliates and their
respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all
losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several,
expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by the
general partner or such other persons, provided that Aimco OP
will not indemnify for (i) willful misconduct or a knowing
violation of the law or (ii) for any transaction for which
such person received an improper personal benefit in violation
or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement. The
provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary
duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership
agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and the
general partner has not obtained an opinion of counsel covering
the provisions set forth in the Aimco OP partnership agreement
that purport to waive or restrict the fiduciary duties of the
general partner that would be in effect under common law were it
not for the partnership agreement.
Certain
United States Tax Risks Associated with an Investment in the OP
Units
The following are among the United States Federal income tax
considerations to be taken into account in connection with an
investment in OP Units. For a general discussion of certain
United States Federal income tax consequences resulting from
acquiring, holding, exchanging, and otherwise disposing of
OP Units, see Material United States Federal Income
Tax Matters Taxation of Aimco OP and
OP Unitholders.
Aimco OP may be treated as a publicly traded
partnership taxable as a corporation. If
Aimco OP were treated as a publicly traded
partnership taxed as a corporation for United States
Federal income tax purposes, material adverse consequences to
the partners and their owners would result. In addition, Aimco
would not qualify as a REIT for United States Federal income tax
purposes, which would have a material adverse impact on Aimco
and its shareholders. Aimco believes and intends to take the
position that Aimco OP should not be treated as a publicly
traded partnership or taxable as a corporation. No
assurances can be given that the Internal Revenue Service, or
the IRS, would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a
contrary position. Accordingly, each prospective investor is
urged to consult his tax advisor regarding the classification
and treatment of Aimco OP as a partnership for
United States Federal income tax purposes.
The limited partners may recognize gain on the
transaction. If a limited partner receives or is
deemed to receive cash or consideration other than OP Units
in connection with the merger, the receipt of such cash or other
consideration would be taxable to the limited partner either as
boot or under the disguised sale rules.
Subject to certain exceptions, including exceptions applicable
to periodic distributions of operating cash flow, any transfer
or deemed transfer of cash by Aimco OP to the limited partner
(or its owners), including cash paid at closing, within two
years before or after a contribution of property that has an
adjusted tax basis in excess of its fair market value, will
generally be treated as part of a disguised sale.
The application of the disguised sale rules is
complex and depends, in part, upon the facts and circumstances
applicable to the limited partner (and its owners), which Aimco
has not undertaken to review. Accordingly, limited partners and
their owners are particularly urged to consult with their tax
advisors concerning the extent to which the disguised
sale rules would apply.
15
A contribution of appreciated or depreciated property may
result in special allocations to the contributing
partner. If property is contributed to Aimco OP,
and the adjusted tax basis of the property differs from its fair
market value, then Aimco OP tax items must be specially
allocated, for United States Federal income tax purposes, in a
manner chosen by Aimco OP such that the contributing partner is
charged with and must recognize the unrealized gain, or benefits
from the unrealized loss, associated with the property at the
time of the contribution. As a result of such special
allocations, the amount of net taxable income allocated to a
contributing partner is likely to exceed the amount of cash
distributions, if any, to which such contributing partner is
entitled.
The Aimco OP general partner could take actions that would
impose tax liability on a contributing
partner. There are a variety of transactions that
Aimco OP may in its sole discretion undertake following a
property contribution that could cause the transferor (or its
partners) to incur a tax liability without a corresponding
receipt of cash. Such transactions include, but are not limited
to, the sale or distribution of a particular property and a
reduction in nonrecourse debt, or certain tax elections made by
Aimco OP. In addition, future economic, market, legal, tax or
other considerations may cause Aimco OP to dispose of the
contributed property or to reduce its debt. As permitted by the
Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner intends to
make decisions in its capacity as general partner of Aimco OP so
as to maximize the profitability of Aimco OP as a whole,
independent of the tax effects on individual holders of
OP Units.
An investors tax liability from OP Units could
exceed the cash distributions received on such
OP Units. A holder of OP Units will be
required to pay United States Federal income tax on such
holders allocable share of Aimco OPs income, even if
such holder receives no cash distributions from Aimco OP. No
assurance can be given that a holder of OP Units will
receive cash distributions equal to such holders allocable
share of taxable income from Aimco OP or equal to the tax
liability to such holder resulting from that income. Further,
upon the sale, exchange or redemption of any OP Units, a
reduction in nonrecourse debt, or upon the special allocation at
the liquidation of Aimco OP, an investor may incur a tax
liability in excess of the amount of cash received.
16
SELECTED
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
The following tables set forth Aimcos selected summary
historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods
indicated. Aimcos historical consolidated statements of
income data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in
the period ended December 31, 2009 and the historical
consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal
year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2009, are
derived from information included in Aimcos Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2010. Aimcos
historical consolidated statements of income data set forth
below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the historical consolidated balance sheet data as
of September 30, 2010, are derived from Aimcos
unaudited interim Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
You should read this information together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and with the
consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated
financial statements included in Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2010 and Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed with the
SEC on November 1, 2010, which are incorporated by
reference in this information statement/prospectus. See
Where You Can Find Additional Information in this
information statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
869,180
|
|
|
$
|
859,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,736
|
|
|
$
|
1,199,423
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,109
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,683
|
|
|
$
|
866,992
|
|
Total operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
(770,635
|
)
|
|
|
(783,101
|
)
|
|
|
(1,051,394
|
)
|
|
|
(1,151,459
|
)
|
|
|
(958,070
|
)
|
|
|
(879,107
|
)
|
|
|
(731,102
|
)
|
Operating income(2)
|
|
|
98,545
|
|
|
|
76,747
|
|
|
|
100,342
|
|
|
|
47,964
|
|
|
|
174,039
|
|
|
|
164,576
|
|
|
|
135,890
|
|
Loss from continuing operations(2)
|
|
|
(123,944
|
)
|
|
|
(136,045
|
)
|
|
|
(198,703
|
)
|
|
|
(119,163
|
)
|
|
|
(50,097
|
)
|
|
|
(44,798
|
)
|
|
|
(36,366
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net(3)
|
|
|
68,532
|
|
|
|
86,289
|
|
|
|
153,903
|
|
|
|
746,165
|
|
|
|
175,603
|
|
|
|
331,820
|
|
|
|
161,718
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(55,412
|
)
|
|
|
(49,756
|
)
|
|
|
(44,800
|
)
|
|
|
627,002
|
|
|
|
125,506
|
|
|
|
287,022
|
|
|
|
125,352
|
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
|
(20,725
|
)
|
|
|
(19,474
|
)
|
|
|
(214,995
|
)
|
|
|
(95,595
|
)
|
|
|
(110,234
|
)
|
|
|
(54,370
|
)
|
Net income attributable to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
(36,626
|
)
|
|
|
(37,631
|
)
|
|
|
(50,566
|
)
|
|
|
(53,708
|
)
|
|
|
(66,016
|
)
|
|
|
(81,132
|
)
|
|
|
(87,948
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Aimco common stockholders
|
|
|
(86,891
|
)
|
|
|
(108,112
|
)
|
|
|
(114,840
|
)
|
|
|
351,314
|
|
|
|
(40,586
|
)
|
|
|
93,710
|
|
|
|
(21,223
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Aimco common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.33
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Aimco common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(0.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
$
|
6,685,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,795,391
|
|
|
$
|
6,956,631
|
|
|
$
|
6,729,914
|
|
|
$
|
6,265,294
|
|
|
$
|
5,573,491
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,617,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,906,468
|
|
|
|
9,441,870
|
|
|
|
10,617,681
|
|
|
|
10,292,587
|
|
|
|
10,019,160
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
|
5,542,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,541,148
|
|
|
|
5,919,771
|
|
|
|
5,534,154
|
|
|
|
4,852,928
|
|
|
|
4,192,292
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,462,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,534,703
|
|
|
|
1,646,749
|
|
|
|
2,048,546
|
|
|
|
2,650,182
|
|
|
|
3,060,969
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
Total consolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
93,008
|
|
|
|
104,301
|
|
|
|
95,202
|
|
|
|
117,719
|
|
|
|
153,758
|
|
|
|
162,432
|
|
|
|
158,548
|
|
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
8,657
|
|
|
|
8,478
|
|
|
|
9,613
|
|
|
|
10,878
|
|
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
|
35,269
|
|
Units managed (end of period)(4)
|
|
|
27,357
|
|
|
|
33,623
|
|
|
|
31,974
|
|
|
|
35,475
|
|
|
|
38,404
|
|
|
|
42,190
|
|
|
|
46,667
|
|
17
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the
September 30, 2010 financial statement presentation,
including retroactive adjustments to reflect additional
properties sold or classified as held for sale as of
September 30, 2010, as discontinued operations (see
Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
in Item 1 Financial Statements in
Aimcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and Note 13
to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data in Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2010, which are
incorporated by reference in this information
statement/prospectus.). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Total operating expenses, operating income and loss from
continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008,
include a $91.1 million pre-tax provision for impairment
losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed
further in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in this information
statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Income from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes
$221.8 million, $800.3 million, $117.6 million,
$337.1 million and $162.7 million in gains on
disposition of real estate, respectively. Income from
discontinued operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007 is discussed
further in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference in this information
statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Units managed represents units in properties for which Aimco
provides asset management services only, although in certain
cases Aimco may indirectly own generally less than one percent
of the economic interest in such properties through a
partnership syndication or other fund. |
18
SELECTED
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF AIMCO PROPERTIES,
L.P.
The following table sets forth Aimco OPs selected summary
historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods
indicated. Aimco OPs historical consolidated statements of
income data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in
the period ended December 31, 2009 and the historical
consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal
year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2009, are
derived from information included in Annex I to this information
statement/prospectus. Aimco OPs historical consolidated
statements of income data set forth below for each of the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the
historical consolidated balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2010, are derived from Aimco OPs
unaudited interim Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 included as Annex
H to this information statement/prospectus.
You should read this information together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and with the
consolidated financial statements included in Annex I and
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed with the
SEC on November 1, 2010, which is included as
Annex H to this information statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
869,180
|
|
|
$
|
859,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,736
|
|
|
$
|
1,199,423
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,109
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,683
|
|
|
$
|
866,992
|
|
Total operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
(770,635
|
)
|
|
|
(783,101
|
)
|
|
|
(1,051,394
|
)
|
|
|
(1,151,459
|
)
|
|
|
(958,070
|
)
|
|
|
(879,107
|
)
|
|
|
(731,102
|
)
|
Operating income(2)
|
|
|
98,545
|
|
|
|
76,747
|
|
|
|
100,342
|
|
|
|
47,964
|
|
|
|
174,039
|
|
|
|
164,576
|
|
|
|
135,890
|
|
Loss from continuing operations(2)
|
|
|
(123,302
|
)
|
|
|
(135,431
|
)
|
|
|
(197,883
|
)
|
|
|
(118,377
|
)
|
|
|
(49,348
|
)
|
|
|
(41,838
|
)
|
|
|
(31,908
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net(3)
|
|
|
68,532
|
|
|
|
86,289
|
|
|
|
153,903
|
|
|
|
746,165
|
|
|
|
175,603
|
|
|
|
331,820
|
|
|
|
161,718
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(54,770
|
)
|
|
|
(49,142
|
)
|
|
|
(43,980
|
)
|
|
|
627,788
|
|
|
|
126,255
|
|
|
|
289,982
|
|
|
|
129,810
|
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
(24,665
|
)
|
|
|
(22,442
|
)
|
|
|
(155,749
|
)
|
|
|
(92,138
|
)
|
|
|
(92,917
|
)
|
|
|
(49,064
|
)
|
Net income attributable to preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(39,918
|
)
|
|
|
(42,189
|
)
|
|
|
(56,854
|
)
|
|
|
(61,354
|
)
|
|
|
(73,144
|
)
|
|
|
(90,527
|
)
|
|
|
(98,946
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
|
(92,893
|
)
|
|
|
(115,996
|
)
|
|
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
|
403,700
|
|
|
|
(43,508
|
)
|
|
|
104,592
|
|
|
|
(22,458
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.32
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
$
|
6,685,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,795,896
|
|
|
$
|
6,957,136
|
|
|
$
|
6,730,419
|
|
|
$
|
6,265,799
|
|
|
$
|
5,573,996
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,633,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
9,456,721
|
|
|
|
10,631,746
|
|
|
|
10,305,903
|
|
|
|
10,031,761
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
|
5,542,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,541,148
|
|
|
|
5,919,771
|
|
|
|
5,534,154
|
|
|
|
4,852,928
|
|
|
|
4,192,292
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
1,479,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,550,374
|
|
|
|
1,661,600
|
|
|
|
2,152,326
|
|
|
|
2,753,617
|
|
|
|
3,164,111
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common unit
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
Total consolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
93,008
|
|
|
|
104,301
|
|
|
|
95,202
|
|
|
|
117,719
|
|
|
|
153,758
|
|
|
|
162,432
|
|
|
|
158,548
|
|
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
8,657
|
|
|
|
8,478
|
|
|
|
9,613
|
|
|
|
10,878
|
|
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
|
35,269
|
|
Units managed (end of period)(4)
|
|
|
27,357
|
|
|
|
33,623
|
|
|
|
31,974
|
|
|
|
35,475
|
|
|
|
38,404
|
|
|
|
42,190
|
|
|
|
46,667
|
|
19
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the
September 30, 2010 financial statement presentation,
including retroactive adjustments to reflect additional
properties sold or classified as held for sale as of
September 30, 2010, as discontinued operations (see
Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
in Item 1 Financial Statements in
Aimco OPs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, and Note 13
to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data included in Annex I to this
information statements/prospectus. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Total operating expenses, operating income and loss from
continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008,
include a $91.1 million pre-tax provision for impairment
losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed
further in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in Annex I to this information
statements/prospectus. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Income from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes
$221.8 million, $800.3 million, $117.6 million,
$337.1 million and $162.7 million in gains on
disposition of real estate, respectively. Income from
discontinued operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007 is discussed
further in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in Annex I to this information
statements/prospectus. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Units managed represents units in properties for which Aimco OP
provides asset management services only, although in certain
cases Aimco OP may indirectly own generally less than one
percent of the economic interest in such properties through a
partnership syndication or other fund. |
20
SELECTED
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF
U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
The following table sets forth USRPs selected summary
historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods
indicated. USRPs historical statements of income and cash
flow data set forth below for each of the two fiscal years in
the period ended December 31, 2009 and the historical
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, are
derived from USRPs financial statements included in
USRPs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. USRPs
historical statements of income and cash flow data set forth
below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the historical balance sheet data as of
September 30, 2010, are derived from USRPs unaudited
interim Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
You should read this information together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and with the financial
statements and notes to the financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 included in USRPs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed with the SEC
on November 12, 2010, which are attached to this
information statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find
Additional Information in this information
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Loss from Continuing Operations per depository unit
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
certificate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss per depository unit certificate
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
Distributions per depository unit certificate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Real Estate, Net of Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
7,254
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
|
|
7,602
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
7,117
|
|
|
|
7,738
|
|
|
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
8,162
|
|
Mortgage Notes Payable
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
10,727
|
|
Due to Affiliates
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
General Partners Deficit
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Limited Partners Deficit
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
(4,905
|
)
|
|
|
(5,050
|
)
|
|
|
(4,509
|
)
|
Total Partners Deficit
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(4,918
|
)
|
|
|
(5,064
|
)
|
|
|
(4,518
|
)
|
Total Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per depository unit certificate
|
|
|
(4.43
|
)
|
|
|
(4.01
|
)
|
|
|
(4.13
|
)
|
|
|
(3.69
|
)
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
21
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
Aimco common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol
AIV. The OP Units are not listed on any
securities exchange and do not trade in an active secondary
market. However, as described below, the trading price of Aimco
common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair
market value of an OP Unit.
The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor
do they trade in an active secondary market. However, after a
one-year holding period, OP Units are redeemable for shares
of Aimco common stock (on a
one-for-one
basis) or cash equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco
elects. As a result, the trading price of Aimco common stock is
considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an
OP Unit. The number of OP Units offered in the merger
with respect to each USRP Unit was calculated by dividing the
per USRP Unit cash merger consideration by the average closing
price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE over the
ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day
immediately prior to the consummation of the merger. The closing
price of Aimco common stock as reported on the NYSE on October
7, 2010, the last trading day before the merger agreement was
entered into, was $22.38.
The USRP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do
they trade in an active secondary market. The per unit cash
merger consideration payable to each holder of USRP Units is
greater than the Corporate General Partners estimate of
the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited
partners (following the repayment of debt and other liabilities)
if Twin Lakes Apartments was sold at a price equal to its
appraised value, given that the Corporate General Partner did
not deduct certain amounts that would be payable upon an
immediate sale of the property, such as prepayment penalties on
the mortgage debt of the property.
The following tables summarize the historical per share
information for Aimco, Aimco OP and USRP for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share/unit/unit certificate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimco Common Stock
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
Aimco OP Units
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
USRP Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
Loss per common share/unit/unit certificate from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimco Common Stock
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.42
|
)
|
Aimco OP Units
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
USRP Units
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Book value per share/unit/unit certificate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimco Common Stock(1)
|
|
$
|
10.20
|
|
|
$
|
10.64
|
|
Aimco OP Units(2)
|
|
|
9.39
|
|
|
|
9.88
|
|
USRP Units
|
|
|
(4.43
|
)
|
|
|
(4.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on 117.0 million and 116.5 million shares of
common stock outstanding at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on 125.3 million and 124.9 million common OP
Units and equivalents outstanding at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. |
22
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE AIMCO ENTITIES
Aimco is a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10,
1994. Aimco is a self-administered and self-managed real estate
investment trust, or REIT. Aimcos goal is to provide above
average returns with lower volatility. Aimcos business
plan to achieve this goal is to:
|
|
|
|
|
own and operate a broadly diversified portfolio of primarily
class B/B+ assets with properties concentrated in
the 20 largest markets in the United States (as measured by
total apartment value, which is the total market value of
institutional-grade apartment properties in a particular market);
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve its portfolio through selling assets with lower
projected returns and reinvesting those proceeds through the
purchase of new assets or redevelopment of assets in its
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
finance its operations using non-recourse, long-dated,
fixed-rate property debt and perpetual preferred equity.
|
As of September 30, 2010, Aimco:
|
|
|
|
|
owned an equity interest in 227 conventional real estate
properties with 70,844 units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned an equity interest in 251 affordable real estate
properties with 29,097 units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided services for or managed 27,357 units in 323
properties, primarily pursuant to long-term asset management
agreements. In certain cases, Aimco may indirectly own generally
less than one percent of the operations of such properties
through a syndication or other fund.
|
Of these properties, Aimco consolidated 225 conventional
properties with 69,540 units and 194 affordable properties
with 23,468 units.
Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, AIMCO-GP, the general
partner of Aimco OP, and AIMCO-LP Trust, Aimco owns a majority
of the ownership interests in Aimco OP. As of September 30,
2010, Aimco held approximately 93% of the common partnership
units and equivalents of Aimco OP. Aimco conducts substantially
all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets
through Aimco OP. Interests in Aimco OP that are held by limited
partners other than Aimco include partnership common units or
OP Units, partnership preferred units and high performance
partnership units, or HPUs. Aimco OPs income is allocated
to holders of OP Units and equivalents based on the
weighted average number of OP Units and equivalents
outstanding during the period. The holders of the OP Units
receive distributions, prorated from the date of issuance, in an
amount equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of Aimco
common stock. Holders of OP Units may redeem such units for
cash or, at Aimco OPs option, Aimco common stock.
Partnership preferred units entitle the holders thereof to a
preference with respect to distributions or upon liquidation. At
September 30, 2010, after elimination of shares held by
consolidated subsidiaries, 117,033,718 shares of Aimco
common stock were outstanding and Aimco OP had 8,278,966
OP Units and equivalents outstanding for a combined total
of 125,312,684 shares of Aimco common stock and Aimco
OP Units outstanding (excluding partnership preferred
units).
AIMCO/IPT, Inc. owns all of the outstanding common stock of the
Corporate General Partner, and Aimco owns all of the outstanding
common stock of AIMCO/IPT, Inc.
AIMCO USRP Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a
Delaware limited liability company formed on September 29,
2010, for the purpose of consummating the merger with USRP. The
Aimco Subsidiary is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Aimco
OP. The Aimco Subsidiary has not carried on any activities to
date, except for activities incidental to its formation and
activities undertaken in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
The names, positions and business addresses of the directors and
executive officers of Aimco, Aimco OP, AIMCO-GP, the Corporate
General Partner, AIMCO/IPT, Inc. and the Aimco Subsidiary, as
well as a biographical summary of the experience of such persons
for the past five years or more, are set forth on
Annex C attached hereto and are incorporated in this
information statement/prospectus by reference. During the last
five years, none of Aimco,
Aimco-GP,
AIMCO/IPT, Inc., Aimco OP, USRP or the Corporate General Partner
nor, to the best of their knowledge, any of the persons listed
in Annex C of this information statement/prospectus
(i) has been convicted in a
23
criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar
misdemeanors) or (ii) was a party to a civil proceeding of
a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and
as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment,
decree or final order enjoining further violations of or
prohibiting activities subject to federal or state securities
laws or finding any violation with respect to such laws.
Additional information about Aimco OP is included in documents
incorporated by reference into this information
statement/prospectus. Additional information about Aimco OP is
included in Annexes G, H and I to this information
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find Additional
Information.
The following chart represents the organizational structure of
the Aimco Entities:
24
INFORMATION
ABOUT U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership is a Delaware
limited partnership organized on January 23,1986. USRP is
engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate
property for investment. It commenced operations on
August 26, 1986 and acquired its first property, a newly
constructed apartment property, on August 28, 1986.
Subsequently, it acquired an existing apartment property, a
newly constructed shopping center and an existing shopping
center. The shopping centers were sold on February 1, 1999
and July 2, 1999, respectively, and one of the apartment
properties was sold on December 20, 2006.
Commencing on August 26, 1986, USRP delivered 1,222,000
depositary unit certificates, or DUCs, to Wheat First
Securities, Inc. and received $30,550,000 ($25.00 per DUC) in
proceeds. The DUCs were offered by several underwriters in
minimum investment amounts of 100 DUCs ($25.00 per DUC). Since
its initial offering, USRP has not received, nor are its limited
partners required to make, any additional contributions. USRP
also received $16,369,000 as proceeds from a contemporaneous
private bond offering. It used substantially all of the proceeds
from these offerings to acquire its initial four operating
properties. On April 1, 1993, USRP filed for protection
under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. The filing
was made due to the partnerships inability to repay its
secured debt due to an insurance company. Subsequently, on
April 23, 1993, USRP filed a reorganization plan with the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South
Carolina, the significant provision of which involved the
refinancing of the secured debt. On July 23, 1993, the
court entered an order confirming USRPs plan of
reorganization, and on January 27, 1994, closed the case.
USRPs partnership agreement provides that the partnership
is to terminate on December 31, 2021 unless terminated
prior to such date. The Corporate General Partner is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Aimco.
At September 30, 2010, USRP owned and operated one
property, Twin Lakes Apartments, a 262 unit apartment
project located in Palm Harbor, Florida.
The average annual rental rates for each of the five years ended
December 31, 2009 for the property are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Rental Rates
|
Property
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
$
|
8,819/unit
|
|
|
$
|
9,251/unit
|
|
|
$
|
9,334/unit
|
|
|
$
|
9,039/unit
|
|
|
$
|
8,381/unit
|
|
The average occupancy for each of the five years ended
December 31, 2009 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 for the property is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Occupancy
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
Property
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
The real estate industry is highly competitive. USRPs
property is subject to competition from other residential
apartment complexes in the area. The Corporate General Partner
believes that the property is adequately insured. The property
is an apartment complex which leases units for terms of one year
or less. No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the
available rental space.
USRP regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the
property. While USRP has no material commitments for property
improvements and replacements, certain routine capital
expenditures are anticipated during 2010. Such capital
expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the
property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the
property. The property is in good condition, subject to normal
depreciation and deterioration as is typical for assets of this
type and age.
25
The following table sets forth certain information relating to
the mortgages encumbering Twin Lakes Apartments at
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Due at
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Rate(1)
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Maturity(2)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
1st mortgage
|
|
$
|
6,077
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
|
|
120 months
|
|
|
|
12/01/15
|
|
|
$
|
5,685
|
|
2nd mortgage
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
120 months
|
|
|
|
12/01/15
|
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
3rd mortgage
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
|
|
98 months
|
|
|
|
12/01/15
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fixed rate mortgages. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note B Mortgage Notes Payable
to the financial statements included in Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in USRPs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 attached hereto as
Annex D for information with respect to USRPs
ability to prepay these mortgages and other specific details
about the mortgages. |
Distributions
to Limited Partners
USRP presently has only USRP Units issued and outstanding. The
USRP Units are entitled to allocations of profit and loss, and
distributions, relating to USRPs interest in Twin Lakes
Apartments. As of November 12, 2010, there were 1,222,000
USRP Units outstanding, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned
900,195 of those certificates, or approximately 73.67% of the
number of USRP Units outstanding.
There were no distributions made by USRP during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 or during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Future cash distributions will depend
on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the timing
of debt maturity, property sale
and/or
refinancings. USRPs cash available for distribution is
reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and
payable to affiliates at September 30, 2010, it is unlikely
that the partnership will generate sufficient funds from
operations, after capital improvement expenditures and repayment
of amounts accrued and payable to affiliates, to permit
distributions to its partners during 2010 or subsequent periods.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
USRP has no employees and depends on the Corporate General
Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration
of all partnership activities. The USRP partnership agreement
provides that the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates
receive certain payments for services and reimbursement of
certain expenses incurred on behalf of USRP.
The USRP partnership agreement also provides that the Corporate
General Partner and its affiliates receive 5% of gross receipts
from USRPs property as compensation for providing property
management services. USRP was charged by affiliates
approximately $123,000 and $126,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and approximately
$94,000 and $91,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged USRP for
reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting
to approximately $85,000 and $206,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. A portion of
these reimbursements for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 are for construction management services provided by an
affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of approximately
$57,000 and $158,000, respectively.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged USRP for
reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting
to approximately $24,000 and $79,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. A portion of
these reimbursements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 are
26
for construction management services provided by an affiliate
of the Corporate General Partner of approximately $2,000 and
$56,000, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, Aimco OP
advanced USRP approximately $365,000 and $1,222,000,
respectively, to fund capital improvements and real estate taxes
at Twin Lakes Apartments. During the year ended
December 31, 2009, USRP repaid Aimco OP approximately
$285,000, which included approximately $142,000 of accrued
interest. No such payments were made during the year ended
December 31, 2008. In accordance with the USRP partnership
agreement, interest was charged at the prime rate plus 2% per
annum. Interest expense was approximately $91,000 and $58,000
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
Aimco OP advanced USRP approximately $137,000 and $205,000,
respectively, to fund operating expenses and capital
improvements, respectively, at Twin Lakes Apartments. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, USRP repaid
Aimco OP $275,000 and $225,000, respectively, of principal and
accrued interest. In accordance with the USRP partnership
agreement, interest was charged at the prime rate plus 2% (5.25%
at September 30, 2010) per annum. Interest expense was
approximately $69,000 and $68,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
September 30, 2010, the total of outstanding advances and
accrued interest due to Aimco OP was approximately $1,695,000.
USRP may receive additional advances of funds from Aimco OP
although Aimco OP is not obligated to provide such advances. For
more information on Aimco OP, see Annexes G, H and I of
this information statement/prospectus.
USRP insures its property up to certain limits through coverage
provided by Aimco, which generally is self-insured for a portion
of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation,
property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. USRP
insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance
policies obtained by Aimco from insurers unaffiliated with the
Corporate General Partner. During the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, USRP was charged by Aimco and
its affiliates approximately $77,000 and $57,000, respectively,
for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims
administration. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, USRP was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately
$85,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy
claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by
USRP during 2010 as other insurance policies renew later in the
year.
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner
interests in USRP, Aimco and its affiliates owned 900,195 USRP
Units representing approximately 73.67% of the number of USRP
Units outstanding, at November 12, 2010. Pursuant to the
USRP partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority
of the USRP Units are entitled to take action with respect to a
variety of matters that include voting on certain amendments to
the USRP partnership agreement and voting to remove the
Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of
73.67% of the outstanding USRP Units, Aimco and its affiliates
are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect
to USRP. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary
duties to USRPs limited partners, it also owes fiduciary
duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly owned by Aimco.
As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner to USRP
and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties
of the Corporate General Partner to its sole stockholder.
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
USRP has no directors or executive officers of its own. The
names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by,
the present directors and officers of the Corporate General
Partner as of September 30, 2010 are set forth in
Annex C to this information statement/prospectus.
One or more of those persons are also directors
and/or
officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general
partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of
securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Further, one or more of
those persons are also officers of Aimco and the general partner
of Aimco OP, entities that have a class of securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are
subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Exchange Act. There are no family relationships between or
among any officers or directors. No remuneration was paid to
USRP nor its directors or officers during the year ended
December 31, 2009.
27
The board of directors of the Corporate General Partner does not
have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors
of the Corporate General Partner fulfills the functions of an
audit committee. The board of directors has determined that
Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an audit
committee financial expert.
The directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner with
authority over USRP are all employees of subsidiaries of Aimco.
Aimco has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such
directors and officers that is posted on Aimcos website
(www.aimco.com). Aimcos website is not incorporated by
reference to this filing.
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The General Partners own all of the outstanding general partner
interests in USRP, which constitute 2% of the total interests in
the partnership. USRP has no directors or executive officers of
its own. The Corporate General Partner is a South Carolina
corporation, which is indirectly wholly owned by Aimco. The
Other General Partner is an affiliate of the Corporate General
Partner and Aimco. None of the Corporate General Partner or any
of its directors or executive officers owns any of the USRP
Units. The following table sets forth certain information as of
November 12, 2010 with respect to the ownership by any
person (including any group, as that term is used in
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known to us to be the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of the USRP Units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percent of
|
Entity Name and Address
|
|
Units
|
|
Class
|
|
AIMCO Properties, L.P.(1)
|
|
|
900,195
|
|
|
|
73.67
|
%
|
4582 South Ulster Street Parkway,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the sole general
partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., and owns approximately a 1%
general partner interest in AIMCO Properties, L.P. AIMCO-GP,
Inc. is wholly owned by Apartment Investment and Management
Company. As of November 12, 2010, AIMCO-LP Trust, a
Delaware trust wholly owned by Apartment Investment and
Management Company, owns approximately a 92% interest in the OP
Units and equivalents of AIMCO Properties, L.P. |
Additional
Information
For additional information about USRP and its property and
operating data related to this property, see USRPs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, attached hereto as
Annex D and USRPs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, attached hereto
as Annex E.
28
THE
MERGER
Background
of the Merger
The Corporate General Partner regularly evaluates USRPs
property by considering various factors, such as the
partnerships financial position and real estate and
capital markets conditions. The Corporate General Partner
monitors the propertys specific locale and
sub-market
conditions (including stability of the surrounding
neighborhood), evaluating current trends, competition, new
construction and economic changes. It oversees the operating
performance of the property and continuously evaluates the
physical improvement requirements. In addition, the financing
structure for the property (including any prepayment penalties),
tax implications to limited partners, availability of attractive
mortgage financing to a purchaser, and the investment climate
are all considered. Any of these factors, and possibly others,
can potentially contribute to any decision by the Corporate
General Partner to sell, refinance, upgrade with capital
improvements or hold USRPs property.
In early 2010, the Corporate General Partner began to consider
strategic alternatives for USRP and its sole property, Twin
Lakes Apartments. The Corporate General Partner considered the
costs of operating USRP, including audit, tax and SEC reporting
costs. The Corporate General Partner looked at these costs,
among other things, in light of Aimcos significant
ownership percentage. The Corporate General Partner also
considered past loans and advances that had been made by Aimco
OP to USRP, including an aggregate of approximately $2,036,000
between 2007 and early 2010 to help fund operating expenses at
Twin Lakes Apartments. Aimco OP has indicated an unwillingness
to make additional advances to USRP.
On March 10, 2010, Mr. Terry Considine, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Aimco, and Mr. Derek McCandless,
Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel and Assistant
Secretary of Aimco and the Corporate General Partner, met to
discuss strategic alternatives for the Twin Lakes Apartments.
Messrs. Considine and McCandless agreed to explore the
possibility of Aimco OP acquiring the property through a
transaction that would provide the unaffiliated limited partners
with the opportunity to defer tax gain through an exchange of
USRP Units for OP Units.
During March and April 2010, Mr. McCandless sought advice
from representatives from Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom, LLP, outside legal and tax counsel, to
determine whether a transaction would be feasible that would
result in Aimco OPs ownership of Twin Lakes Apartments
while also providing potential tax deferral to the unaffiliated
limited partners. Subsequently, the Corporate General Partner
decided to obtain an appraisal to determine the value of Twin
Lakes Apartments and to evaluate the proceeds and tax
consequences to limited partners in such a transaction.
Also during March and April 2010, Mr. McCandless spoke with
different appraisers regarding the possibility of appraising
Twin Lakes Apartments for purposes of a potential acquisition by
Aimco OP. On April 13, 2010, the Corporate General Partner
engaged CRA to appraise Twin Lakes Apartments.
On May 26, 2010, CRA informed Mr. McCandless that it
had valued Twin Lakes Apartments at $15.9 million. During
the following two weeks, Mr. McCandless discussed
CRAs assumptions and valuation with Mr. John Bezzant,
Senior Vice President Transactions of Aimco and a
Director and Senior Vice President of the Corporate General
Partner; and Mr. Nikhil Venkatesh, Vice
President Portfolio Strategy of Aimco and Vice
President of the Corporate General Partner. Mr. Bezzant
reviewed the $15.9 million value in light of fiduciary
duties owed to unaffiliated limited partners and Aimco OPs
investment criteria. Aimco OPs investment criteria was to
acquire the property at a price that did not significantly
exceed Aimco OPs estimate of the value of the property,
which it calculated by adding the appraised value of the
property to other assets and deducting therefrom the amount of
liabilities associated with the property, including mortgage
debt (but excluding prepayment penalty). Mr. Bezzant
determined that Aimco OP would pay the appraised value for Twin
Lakes Apartments.
On October 8, 2010, the Corporate General Partners
board of directors held a meeting to discuss the proposed
transaction. The board decided to approve and effect a
transaction with Aimco OP that would give Aimco OP indirect
ownership of Twin Lakes Apartments. On October 8, 2010, the
Corporate General Partner authorized and approved the
transactions. The Corporate General Partner and the Aimco
Entities considered a number of possible alternatives to the
proposed transaction with the Aimco Subsidiary, as described in
greater detail above. However,
29
the Corporate General Partner ultimately determined that the
proposed transaction with the Aimco Subsidiary is in the best
interests of USRP and its limited partners.
Determination
of Merger Consideration
In the merger, each USRP Unit outstanding immediately prior to
consummation of the merger will be converted into the right to
receive, at the election of the holder of such USRP Unit, either
$2.76 in cash or equivalent value in Aimco OP Units, except
in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of
OP Units in this transaction (or registration would be
prohibitively costly). Because Aimco wholly owns the Corporate
General Partner, the merger consideration has not been
determined in an arms-length negotiation. In order to
arrive at a fair consideration, CRA, an independent real estate
appraisal firm, was engaged to perform a complete appraisal of
USRPs property. For more detailed information about the
independent appraisers determination of the estimated
value of the property, see Special Factors The
Appraisal. The per USRP Unit cash merger consideration
payable to each holder of USRP units is greater than the
Corporate General Partners estimate of the proceeds that
would be available for distribution to limited partners
(following the repayment of debt and other liabilities of USRP)
if the property was sold at a price equal to its appraised
value. The Corporate General Partner did not deduct certain
amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of
USRPs property, such as prepayment penalties on the
mortgage debt of the property (currently estimated to be
$2,892,958). The Corporate General Partner calculated the equity
of USRP by (i) adding to the appraised value the value of
any other non-real estate assets of USRP that would not be
included in the appraisal; and (ii) deducting certain
liabilities, including mortgage debt, debt owed to the Corporate
General Partner or its affiliates, accounts payable and accrued
expenses and certain other costs. The amount of liabilities
deducted includes an estimate of $104,800 for expenses
attributable to the property that would be incurred prior to the
merger but payable after the merger. This calculation, which is
summarized below, resulted in per USRP unit cash merger
consideration of $2.76.
|
|
|
|
|
Appraised value of Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
$
|
15,900,000
|
|
Plus: Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
48,563
|
|
Plus: Other assets
|
|
|
129,480
|
|
Less: Mortgage debt, including accrued interest
|
|
|
(10,588,011
|
)
|
Less: Loans from affiliates of the general partner
|
|
|
(1,735,139
|
)
|
Less: Accounts payable and accrued expenses owed to third parties
|
|
|
(197,609
|
)
|
Less: Other liabilities
|
|
|
(82,623
|
)
|
Less: Estimated trailing payables
|
|
|
(104,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net partnership equity
|
|
$
|
3,369,861
|
|
Percentage of net partnership equity allocable to limited
partners
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net partnership equity allocable to limited partners
|
|
$
|
3,369,861
|
|
Total number of Units
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration per Unit
|
|
$
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of OP Units offered per USRP Unit was calculated
by dividing the per USRP Unit cash merger consideration by the
average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the
NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second
trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.
Although there is no public market for OP Units, after a
one-year holding period, each OP Unit is generally
redeemable for cash in an amount equal to the value of one share
of Aimco common stock at the time, subject to Aimcos right
to acquire each OP Unit in exchange for one share of Aimco
common stock (subject to antidilution adjustments). Therefore,
the Corporate General Partner considers the trading price of
Aimco common stock to be a reasonable estimate of the fair
market value of an OP Unit. As of November 12, 2010,
the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the
preceding ten consecutive trading days was $22.15, which would
have resulted in OP Unit consideration of 0.12
OP Units per USRP Unit.
30
Conflicts
of Interest
The Corporate General Partner is indirectly wholly owned by
Aimco. Therefore, it has a conflict of interest with respect to
the merger. The Corporate General Partner has fiduciary duties
to its sole stockholder, which is wholly owned by Aimco, on the
one hand, and to USRP and its limited partners, on the other
hand. The duties of the Corporate General Partner to USRP and
its limited partners conflict with its duties to its sole
stockholder, which could result in the Corporate General Partner
approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than
might be the case absent such conflict of interest. The
Corporate General Partners desire to seek the best
possible terms for USRPs limited partners conflicts with
Aimcos interest in obtaining the best possible terms for
Aimco OP.
Waiver
and Release and Additional Consideration
The parties to a going private transaction such as the proposed
merger are often subject to claims alleging that the transaction
is unfair to unaffiliated security holders. Litigation in these
situations can arise even if the transaction is ultimately found
to be fair to the unaffiliated security holders. In order to
attempt to reduce the probability of any such claims, and the
related costs of defending against any such claims, Aimco OP has
decided to offer unaffiliated limited partners, in addition to
the merger consideration, an additional payment of $0.31 per
USRP Unit in exchange for executing a waiver and release of
potential claims the limited partner may have against the
Releasees (as defined below). The amount of $0.31 per unit was
determined by dividing $100,000 by the number of outstanding
USRP Units held by unaffiliated limited partners. This $100,000
amount represents Aimco OPs estimate of the value of such
a release in potentially reducing its costs to defend against
such claims. Unaffiliated limited partners may elect to receive
the additional consideration by completing the election form,
executing the waiver and release that is attached to the
election form and returning the election form and the executed
waiver and release in accordance with the instructions provided.
In executing the waiver and release, the limited partner, on
behalf of himself, his heirs, estate, executor, administrator,
successors and assigns, will release Aimco OP and its
predecessors, successors and assigns and its present and former
parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, investors, insurers,
reinsurers, officers, directors, employees, agents,
administrators, auditors, attorneys, accountants, information
and solicitation agents, investment bankers, and other
representatives, including, but not limited to, Aimco and the
General Partners (collectively, the Releasees), from
any and all claims and causes of action, whether brought
individually, on behalf of a class, or derivatively, demands,
rights, or liabilities, including, but not limited to, claims
for negligence, gross negligence, fraud, breach of fiduciary
duty (including, but not limited to, duties of care, loyalty or
candor), mismanagement, corporate waste, misrepresentation,
whether intentional or negligent, misstatements and omissions to
disclose, breach of contract, violations of any state or federal
statutes, rules or regulations, whether known claims or unknown
claims, whether past claims, present claims or future claims
through and including the date of the consummation of the
merger, including, but not limited to, those claims that have
arisen or arise, directly or indirectly, out of or relate,
directly or indirectly, to (a) the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby (excluding only such
unaffiliated limited partners rights, if any, under the
merger agreement), (b) any other circumstance, agreement,
activity, action, omission, event or matter occurring or
existing on or prior to the date of the consummation of the
merger, (c) the ownership of any limited partnership
interest in USRP, including, but not limited to, any and all
claims related to the management of USRP or the properties owned
by USRP (whether currently or previously), the payment of
management fees or other monies to the General Partners and to
affiliates of USRP and prior sales of properties, or
(d) the purchase, acquisition, holding, sale or voting of
one or more limited partnership interests in USRP (collectively,
the Released Claims).
The waiver and release do not apply to claims limited partners
may have under the federal securities laws.
Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the
waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment
will expressly waive and relinquish, to the fullest extent
permitted by law and consistent with the release, the
provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the
Civil Code of California, or Section 1542, which provides:
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR
DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN ITS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF
EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE
MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the
waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment
will waive any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred
by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or
principle of common law, that is similar, comparable or
equivalent to Section 1542. Each
31
unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the waiver
and release and to receive the additional cash payment will
acknowledge and agree that he may later discover facts in
addition to or different from those which he or she now knows or
believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the
Released Claims, but such unaffiliated limited partner will be
deemed to have fully, finally and forever settled and released
any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or
unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, that now exist or may
arise in the future through and including the date of the
consummation of the merger under any theory of law or equity now
existing, including, but not limited to, conduct that is
negligent, intentional, with malice, or a breach of any duty,
law or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery of the
existence of such different or additional facts.
Each unaffiliated limited partner who elects to execute the
waiver and release and to receive the additional cash payment
will agree that the release is intended to include the Released
Claims which such unaffiliated limited partner may have and
which such unaffiliated limited partner does not know or suspect
to exist in its favor against the Releasees, and that the
release extinguishes those claims. Each unaffiliated limited
partner who elects to execute the waiver and release and to
receive the additional cash payment will represent and warrant
to the Releasees that such unaffiliated limited partner has not
assigned or otherwise transferred or subrogated any interest in
the Released Claims.
Future
Plans for the Property
After the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in
USRP, and will own all of the outstanding USRP Units. The
Corporate General Partner, the Other General Partner, and
USRPs partnership agreement in effect immediately prior to
the merger will remain unchanged after the merger. Aimco OP
intends to retain the USRP Units after the merger. After the
merger, Aimco will evaluate the capital improvement needs of the
property, and anticipates making certain routine capital
expenditures with respect to the property during the remainder
of 2010.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
For a discussion of the material United States federal income
tax consequences of the merger, see Material United States
Federal Income Tax Matters United States Federal
Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Merger.
Regulatory
Matters
No material federal or state regulatory requirements must be
satisfied or approvals obtained in connection with the merger,
except (1) filing a registration statement that includes
this information statement/prospectus with the SEC and obtaining
the SECs declaration that the registration statement is
effective under the Securities Act, (2) registration or
qualification of the issuance of OP Units under state
securities laws, and (3) filing a certificate of merger
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger
Aimco and Aimco OP will treat the merger as a purchase of
noncontrolling interests for financial accounting purposes. This
means that Aimco and Aimco OP will recognize any difference
between the purchase price for these noncontrolling interests
and the carrying amount of such noncontrolling interests in
Aimco and Aimco OPs consolidated financial statements as
an adjustment to the amounts of consolidated equity and
partners capital attributed to Aimco and Aimco OP,
respectively.
Appraisal
Rights
Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters appraisal
rights under applicable law or USRPs partnership agreement
in connection with the merger. However, pursuant to the terms of
the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner
with contractual dissenters appraisal rights that are
similar to the dissenters appraisal rights available to a
stockholder of a corporation in a merger under Delaware law.
These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner
to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited
partners USRP Units in connection with the merger.
Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve
an arbitration proceeding, and the
32
consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of
such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of
time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash
payment, resulting in a taxable event to such limited partner. A
description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the
procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such
rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as
Annex B.
Expenses
and Fees and Source of Funds
The costs of planning and implementing the merger, including the
cash merger consideration and the preparation of this
information statement/prospectus, will be borne by Aimco OP
without regard to whether the merger is effectuated. The
estimated amount of these costs is approximately $1,142,942
(assuming all limited partners elect to receive the cash merger
consideration and all limited partners unaffiliated with Aimco
OP elect to receive an additional cash payment in exchange for
executing a waiver and release). Aimco OP is paying for the
costs of the merger with funds on hand or from drawings under
its revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility is
pursuant to Aimco OPs Amended and Restated Senior Secured
Credit Agreement, as amended, with a syndicate of financial
institutions, with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative
agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer. As of
September 30, 2010, the Credit Agreement consisted of
$300.0 million of revolving loan commitments. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a
pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 5.00%
with a LIBOR floor of 1.50% or, at Aimco OPs option, a
base rate equal to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.75%). The
revolving credit facility matures May 1, 2013, and may be
extended for an additional year, subject to certain conditions,
including payment of a 35.0 basis point fee on the total
revolving commitments. The amount available under the revolving
credit facility at September 30, 2010, was
$258.7 million (after giving effect to $41.3 million
outstanding for undrawn letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit facility). The proceeds of revolving loans are
generally permitted to be used to fund working capital and for
other corporate purposes. Aimco OPs obligations under the
Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement are secured
by its equity interests in its subsidiaries.
Approvals
Required
Under Delaware law, the merger must be approved by the General
Partners and a majority in interest of the USRP Units. The
General Partners have determined that the merger is advisable
and in the best interests of USRP and its limited partners and
have approved the merger and the merger agreement. As of
November 12, 2010, there were issued and outstanding
1,222,000 USRP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned
900,195 of those certificates, or approximately 73.67% of the
outstanding USRP Units. Aimco OP and its affiliates have
indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as
permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the merger
on or
about ,
2010. As a result, approval of the merger is assured, and
your consent to the merger is not required. Aimco OP has
approved the merger on behalf of the Aimco Subsidiary.
33
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the
merger agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the merger agreement, which is attached to this information
statement/prospectus as Annex A. You should read the merger
agreement carefully in its entirety as it is the legal document
that governs this merger.
The
Merger
USRP has entered into an agreement and plan of merger with the
Aimco Subsidiary and Aimco OP. The Aimco Subsidiary is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Aimco OP and was formed for the purpose of
effecting the merger with USRP. Aimco indirectly wholly owns the
Corporate General Partner and, together with its affiliates,
owns a majority of USRPs outstanding USRP Units.
Under the merger agreement, at the effective time of the merger,
the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into USRP, with
USRP as the surviving entity. In the merger, each USRP Unit
outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the merger will
be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the
holder of such USRP Unit, either $2.76 in cash or equivalent
value in Aimco OP Units (calculated by dividing $2.76 by
the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on
the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the
second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the
merger); provided, however, that if Aimco OP
determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of
Aimco OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that
registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction
would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will
only be entitled to receive $2.76 in cash for each USRP Unit.
Aimco OPs interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be
converted into USRP Units. As a result, after the merger, Aimco
OP will be the sole limited partner of USRP and will own all of
the outstanding USRP Units.
The Corporate General Partners and the Other General
Partners general partner interest in USRP will remain
unchanged after the merger, and the agreement of limited
partnership of USRP as in effect immediately prior to the
consummation of the merger will be the agreement of limited
partnership of USRP after the merger, until thereafter amended
in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law.
Conditions
to Obligations to Complete the Merger
None of the parties to the merger agreement are required to
consummate the merger if any third party consent, authorization
or approval that any of the parties deems necessary or desirable
in connection with the merger agreement, and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated thereby, has not been obtained or
received.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be
abandoned at any time prior to consummation of the merger,
without liability to any party to the merger agreement, by USRP,
Aimco OP or the Aimco Subsidiary, in each case, acting in its
sole discretion and for any reason or for no reason,
notwithstanding the approval of the merger agreement by any of
the partners of USRP or the member of the Aimco Subsidiary.
Amendment
Subject to applicable law, the merger agreement may be amended,
modified or supplemented by written agreement of the parties at
any time prior to the consummation of the merger with respect to
any of the terms contained therein.
Governing
Law
The merger agreement is governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to the
conflict of law provisions thereof.
34
Appraisal
Rights
Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters appraisal
rights under applicable law or USRPs partnership agreement
in connection with the merger. However, pursuant to the terms of
the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner
with contractual dissenters appraisal rights that are
similar to the dissenters appraisal rights available to a
stockholder of a corporation in a merger under Delaware law.
These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner
to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited
partners USRP Units in connection with the merger.
Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve
an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a
limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual
appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot
be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in
a taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the
appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a
limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to
this information statement/prospectus as Annex B.
Election
Forms
Within ten (10) days after the effective time of the
merger, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to the former holders of
USRP Units an election form pursuant to which such holders can
elect to receive cash or OP Units. Limited partners may
also elect appraisal of their USRP Units pursuant to the
election form. Holders of USRP Units may elect their form of
consideration by completing and returning the election form in
accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does
not receive a properly completed election form from a holder
before 5:00 p.m., New York time on the 30th day after
the merger, the holder will be deemed to have elected to receive
the cash consideration. Former holders of USRP Units may also
use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger
consideration, the appraised value of their USRP Units,
determined through an arbitration proceeding.
In addition, limited partners who are not affiliated with Aimco
OP may elect to receive an additional cash payment of $0.31 per
USRP Unit in exchange for executing a waiver and release of
certain claims. The waiver and release do not apply to claims
limited partners may have under the Federal securities laws. In
order to receive such additional consideration, limited partners
must complete the election form, execute the waiver and release
that is attached to the election form and return both the
election form and the executed waiver and release to the
information agent as described above. For a full description of
the waiver and release and additional consideration, see
The Merger Waiver and Release and Additional
Consideration beginning on page 31.
35
DESCRIPTION
OF AIMCO OP UNITS; SUMMARY OF AIMCO OP PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT
The following description sets forth some general terms and
provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The following
description of the Aimco OP partnership agreement is qualified
in its entirety by the terms of the agreement.
General
Aimco OP is a limited partnership organized under the provisions
of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as
amended from time to time, or any successor to such statute, or
the Delaware Act, and upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in its agreement of limited partnership.
AIMCO-GP, a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
Aimco, is the sole general partner of Aimco OP. Another wholly
owned subsidiary of Aimco, AIMCO-LP Trust, a Delaware trust, or
the special limited partner, is a limited partner in Aimco OP.
The term of Aimco OP commenced on May 16, 1994, and will
continue in perpetuity, unless Aimco OP is dissolved sooner
under the provisions of the partnership agreement or as
otherwise provided by law.
Purpose
And Business
The purpose and nature of Aimco OP is to conduct any business,
enterprise or activity permitted by or under the Delaware Act,
including, but not limited to, (i) to conduct the business
of ownership, construction, development and operation of
multifamily rental apartment communities, (ii) to enter
into any partnership, joint venture, business trust arrangement,
limited liability company or other similar arrangement to engage
in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, or to
own interests in any entity engaged in any business permitted by
or under the Delaware Act, (iii) to conduct the business of
providing property and asset management and brokerage services,
whether directly or through one or more partnerships, joint
ventures, subsidiaries, business trusts, limited liability
companies or other similar arrangements, and (iv) to do
anything necessary or incidental to the foregoing; provided,
however, such business and arrangements and interests may be
limited to and conducted in such a manner as to permit Aimco, in
the sole and absolute discretion of the general partner, at all
times to be classified as a REIT.
Management
By The General Partner
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Aimco OP
partnership agreement, all management powers over the business
and affairs of Aimco OP are exclusively vested in the general
partner. No limited partner of Aimco OP or any other person to
whom one or more OP Units have been transferred (each, an
assignee) may take part in the operations,
management or control (within the meaning of the Delaware Act)
of Aimco OPs business, transact any business in Aimco
OPs name or have the power to sign documents for or
otherwise bind Aimco OP. The general partner may not be removed
by the limited partners with or without cause, except with the
consent of the general partner. In addition to the powers
granted to a general partner of a limited partnership under
applicable law or that are granted to the general partner under
any other provision of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the
general partner, subject to the other provisions of the Aimco OP
partnership agreement, has full power and authority to do all
things deemed necessary or desirable by it to conduct the
business of Aimco OP, to exercise all powers of Aimco OP and to
effectuate the purposes of Aimco OP. Aimco OP may incur debt or
enter into other similar credit, guarantee, financing or
refinancing arrangements for any purpose (including, without
limitation, in connection with any acquisition of properties)
upon such terms as the general partner determines to be
appropriate. The general partner is authorized to execute,
deliver and perform specific agreements and transactions on
behalf of Aimco OP without any further act, approval or vote of
the limited partners.
Restrictions on General Partners
Authority. The general partner may not take any
action in contravention of the Aimco OP partnership agreement.
The general partner may not, without the prior consent of the
limited partners, undertake, on behalf of Aimco OP, any of the
following actions or enter into any transaction that would have
the effect of such transactions: (i) except as provided in
the partnership agreement, amend, modify or terminate the
partnership agreement other than to reflect the admission,
substitution, termination or withdrawal of partners;
(ii) make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors
or appoint or acquiesce in the appointment of a custodian,
receiver or trustee for all or any part of the assets of Aimco
OP; (iii) institute any proceeding for bankruptcy on
36
behalf of Aimco OP; or (iv) subject to specific exceptions,
approve or acquiesce to the transfer of Aimco OP interest of the
general partner, or admit into Aimco OP any additional or
successor general partners.
Additional Limited Partners. The general
partner is authorized to admit additional limited partners to
Aimco OP from time to time, on terms and conditions and for such
capital contributions as may be established by the general
partner in its reasonable discretion. The net capital
contribution need not be equal for all partners. No action or
consent by the limited partners is required in connection with
the admission of any additional limited partner. The general
partner is expressly authorized to cause Aimco OP to issue
additional interests (i) upon the conversion, redemption or
exchange of any debt, OP Units or other securities issued
by Aimco OP, (ii) for less than fair market value, so long
as the general partner concludes in good faith that such
issuance is in the best interests of the general partner and
Aimco OP, and (iii) in connection with any merger of any
other entity into Aimco OP if the applicable merger agreement
provides that persons are to receive interests in Aimco OP in
exchange for their interests in the entity merging into Aimco
OP. Subject to Delaware law, any additional partnership
interests may be issued in one or more classes, or one or more
series of any of such classes, with such designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights, powers and duties as shall be determined by the
general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion without the
approval of any limited partner, and set forth in a written
document thereafter attached to and made an exhibit to the
partnership agreement. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the general partner has authority to specify
(a) the allocations of items of partnership income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit to each such class or series of
partnership interests; (b) the right of each such class or
series of partnership interests to share in distributions;
(c) the rights of each such class or series of partnership
interests upon dissolution and liquidation of Aimco OP;
(d) the voting rights, if any, of each such class or series
of partnership interests; and (e) the conversion,
redemption or exchange rights applicable to each such class or
series of partnership interests. No person may be admitted as an
additional limited partner without the consent of the general
partner, which consent may be given or withheld in the general
partners sole and absolute discretion.
Outstanding
Classes Of Units
As of September 30, 2010, Aimco OP had issued and
outstanding the following partnership interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
Preference
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Distribution per Unit
|
|
|
(per Unit)
|
|
|
Partnership Common Units (OP Units)
|
|
|
122,972,734
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Class G Partnership Preferred Units(1)
|
|
|
4,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.586
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class T Partnership Preferred Units
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class U Partnership Preferred Units
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.484
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class V Partnership Preferred Units
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class Y Partnership Preferred Units
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.492
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Series A CRA Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units(2)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
2,274.44
|
|
|
$
|
500,000.00
|
|
Class One Partnership Preferred Units(3)
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
91.43
|
|
Class Two Partnership Preferred Units(3)
|
|
|
23,700
|
|
|
$
|
0.115
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class Three Partnership Preferred Units(3)
|
|
|
1,366,771
|
|
|
$
|
0.4923
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class Four Partnership Preferred Units(3)
|
|
|
755,999
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class Six Partnership Preferred Units(3)
|
|
|
796,668
|
|
|
$
|
0.53125
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class Seven Partnership Preferred Units(3)
|
|
|
27,960
|
|
|
$
|
0.5938
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units(4)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Class I High Performance Partnership Units (HPUs)(4)
|
|
|
2,339,950
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 7, 2010, Aimco OP redeemed all of the
outstanding Class G Partnership Preferred Units. The
redemption was funded primarily from the proceeds of Aimco
OPs issuance to Aimco of 4,000,000 Class U
Partnership Preferred Units during September 2010. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
During 2006, Aimco sold 200 shares of its Series A
Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value per share, or the CRA Preferred Stock, with
a liquidation preference of $500,000 per share, for |
37
|
|
|
|
|
net proceeds of $97.5 million. The Series A Community
Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units, or the
CRA Preferred Units, have substantially the same terms as the
CRA Preferred Stock. Holders of the CRA Preferred Units are
entitled to cumulative cash dividends payable quarterly in
arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30, and
December 31 of each year, when and as declared, beginning on
September 30, 2006. For the period from the date of
original issuance through March 31, 2015, the distribution
rate is a variable rate per annum equal to the Three-Month LIBOR
Rate (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the
CRA Preferred Stock) plus 1.25%, calculated as of the beginning
of each quarterly dividend period. The rate at
September 30, 2010 was 1.78%. Upon liquidation, holders of
the CRA Preferred Stock are entitled to a preference of $500,000
per share, plus an amount equal to accumulated, accrued and
unpaid dividends, whether or not earned or declared. The CRA
Preferred Units rank prior to Common OP Units and on the same
level as Aimco OPs other Preferred OP Units, with respect
to the payment of distributions and the distribution of amounts
upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The CRA Preferred
Units are not redeemable prior to June 30, 2011, except in
limited circumstances related to Aimcos REIT
qualification. On and after June 30, 2011, the CRA
Preferred Units are redeemable for cash, in whole or from time
to time in part, upon the redemption, at Aimcos option, of
its CRA Preferred Stock at a price per share equal to the
liquidation preference, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid
distributions, if any, to the redemption date. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The Class One, Class Two, Class Three,
Class Four, Class Six and Class Seven preferred
OP Units are redeemable, at the holders option. Aimco OP,
at its sole discretion, may settle such redemption requests in
cash or shares of Aimcos Class A Common Stock in a
value equal to the redemption preference. In the event Aimco OP
requires Aimco to issue shares to settle a redemption request,
it would issue to Aimco a corresponding number of common OP
Units. Aimco OP has a redemption policy that requires cash
settlement of redemption requests for the redeemable preferred
OP Units, subject to limited exceptions. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The holders of Class Eight preferred OP Units and HPUs
receive the same amount of distributions that are paid to
holders of an equivalent number of Aimco OPs outstanding
common OP Units. |
Distributions
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership
preferred units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the
general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all,
or such portion as the general partner may in its sole and
absolute discretion determine, of Available Cash (as defined in
the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP during such
quarter to the general partner, the special limited partner, the
other holders of OP Units and holders of HPUs on the record
date established by the general partner with respect to such
quarter, in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco
OP on such record date. Holders of any partnership preferred
units issued in the future may have priority over the general
partner, the special limited partner, holders of OP Units
and holders of HPUs with respect to distributions of Available
Cash, distributions upon liquidation or other distributions.
Distributions payable with respect to any interest in Aimco OP
that was not outstanding during the entire quarterly period in
respect of which any distribution is made will be prorated based
on the portion of the period that such interest was outstanding.
The general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may
distribute to the limited partners Available Cash on a more
frequent basis and provide for an appropriate record date. The
partnership agreement requires the general partner to take such
reasonable efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute
discretion and consistent with the requirements for
qualification as a REIT, to cause Aimco OP to distribute
sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to transfer
funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder dividends
that will (i) satisfy the requirements, or the REIT
Requirements, for qualifying as a REIT under the Code and the
applicable Treasury Regulations and (ii) avoid any United
States Federal income or excise tax liability of Aimco.
While some of the debt instruments to which Aimco OP is a party,
including its credit facilities, contain restrictions on the
payment of distributions to OP Unitholders, the debt
instruments allow Aimco OP to distribute sufficient amounts to
enable the general partner and special limited partner to
transfer funds to Aimco which are
38
then used to pay stockholder dividends thereby allowing Aimco to
meet the requirements for qualifications as a REIT under the
Code.
Distributions in Kind. No OP Unitholder
has any right to demand or receive property other than cash as
provided in the partnership agreement. The general partner may
determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, to make a
distribution in kind of partnership assets to the
OP Unitholders, and such assets will be distributed in such
a fashion as to ensure that the fair market value is distributed
and allocated in accordance with the Aimco OP partnership
agreement.
Distributions Upon Liquidation. Subject to the
rights of holders of any outstanding partnership preferred
units, net proceeds from the sale or other disposition of all or
substantially all of its assets in a transaction that will lead
to a liquidation of Aimco OP or a related series of transactions
that, taken together, result in the sale or other disposition of
all or substantially all of the assets of Aimco OP, or a
Terminating Capital Transaction, and any other cash received or
reductions in reserves made after commencement of the
liquidation of Aimco OP, will be distributed to the
OP Unitholders in accordance with the Aimco OP partnership
agreement.
Restricted Distributions. The Aimco OP
partnership agreement prohibits Aimco OP and the general
partner, on behalf of Aimco OP, from making a distribution to
any OP Unitholder on account of its interest in
OP Units if such distribution would violate
Section 17-607
of the Delaware Act or other applicable law.
Allocations
Of Net Income And Net Loss
OP Units and HPUs. Net Income (as defined
in the Aimco OP partnership agreement) and Net Loss (as defined
in the Aimco OP partnership agreement) of Aimco OP will be
determined and allocated with respect to each fiscal year of
Aimco OP as of the end of each such year. Except as otherwise
provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, an allocation to
an OP Unitholder of a share of Net Income or Net Loss will
be treated as an allocation of the same share of each item of
income, gain, loss or deduction that is taken into account in
computing Net Income or Net Loss. Except as otherwise provided
in the Aimco OP partnership agreement and subject to the terms
of any outstanding partnership preferred units, Net Income and
Net Loss will be allocated to the holders of OP Units and
holders of HPUs in accordance with their respective interests at
the end of each fiscal year. The Aimco OP partnership agreement
contains provisions for special allocations intended to comply
with certain regulatory requirements, including the requirements
of Treasury Regulations
Sections 1.704-1(b)
and 1.704-2. Except as otherwise provided in the Aimco OP
partnership agreement and subject to the terms of any
outstanding partnership preferred units, for United States
Federal income tax purposes under the Code and the Treasury
Regulations, each partnership item of income, gain, loss and
deduction will be allocated among the OP Unitholders in the
same manner as its correlative item of book income,
gain, loss or deduction is allocated under the Aimco OP
partnership agreement.
Partnership Preferred Units. Net income will
be allocated to the holders of partnership preferred units for
any fiscal year (and, if necessary, subsequent fiscal years) to
the extent that the holders of partnership preferred units
receive a distribution on any partnership preferred units (other
than an amount included in any redemption of partnership
preferred units). If any partnership preferred units are
redeemed, for the fiscal year that includes such redemption
(and, if necessary, for subsequent fiscal years) (i) gross
income and gain (in such relative proportions as the general
partner in its discretion will determine) will be allocated to
the holders of partnership preferred units to the extent that
the redemption amounts paid or payable with respect to the
partnership preferred units so redeemed exceeds the aggregate
capital contributions (net of liabilities assumed or taken
subject to by Aimco OP) per partnership preferred units
allocable to the partnership preferred units so redeemed and
(ii) deductions and losses (in such relative proportions as
the general partner in its discretion will determine) will be
allocated to the holders of partnership preferred units to the
extent that the aggregate capital contributions (net of
liabilities assumed or taken subject to by Aimco OP) per
partnership preferred units allocable to the partnership
preferred units so redeemed exceeds the redemption amount paid
or payable with respect to the partnership preferred units so
redeemed.
Withholding
Aimco OP is authorized to withhold from or pay on behalf of or
with respect to each limited partner any amount of Federal,
state, local or foreign taxes that the general partner
determines that Aimco OP is required to
39
withhold or pay with respect to any amount distributable or
allocable to such limited partner under the Aimco OP partnership
agreement. The Aimco OP partnership agreement also provides that
any withholding tax amount paid on behalf of or with respect to
a limited partner constitutes a loan by Aimco OP to such limited
partner. This loan is required to be repaid within 15 days
after notice to the limited partner from the general partner,
and each limited partner grants a security interest in its
partnership interest to secure its obligation to pay any
partnership withholding tax amounts paid on its behalf or with
respect to such limited partner. In addition, under the Aimco OP
partnership agreement, the partnership may redeem the
partnership interest of any limited partner who fails to pay
partnership withholding tax amounts paid on behalf of or with
respect to such limited partner. Also, the general partner has
authority to withhold, from any amounts otherwise distributable,
allocable or payable to a limited partner, the general
partners estimate of further taxes required to be paid by
such limited partner.
Return Of
Capital
No partner is entitled to interest on its capital contribution
or on such partners capital account. Except (i) under
the rights of redemption set forth in the Aimco OP partnership
agreement, (ii) as provided by law, or (iii) under the
terms of any outstanding partnership preferred units, no partner
has any right to demand or receive the withdrawal or return of
its capital contribution from Aimco OP, except to the extent of
distributions made under the Aimco OP partnership agreement or
upon termination of Aimco OP. Except to the extent otherwise
expressly provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement and
subject to the terms of any outstanding partnership preferred
units, no limited partner or assignee will have priority over
any other limited partner or Assignee either as to the return of
capital contributions or as to profits, losses or distributions.
Redemption Rights
Of Qualifying Parties
After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of
OP Units, each OP Unitholder and some assignees have
the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
Aimco OP partnership agreement, to require Aimco OP to redeem
all or a portion of the OP Units held by such party in
exchange for shares of Aimco common stock or a cash amount equal
to the value of such shares, as Aimco OP may determine. On or
before the close of business on the fifth business day after a
holder of OP Units gives the general partner a notice of
redemption, Aimco OP may, in its sole and absolute discretion
but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of Aimco stock
imposed under Aimcos charter and the transfer restrictions
and other limitations thereof, elect to cause Aimco to acquire
some or all of the tendered OP Units from the tendering
party in exchange for Aimco common stock, based on an exchange
ratio of one share of Aimco common stock for each OP Unit,
subject to adjustment as provided in the Aimco OP partnership
agreement. The Aimco OP partnership agreement does not obligate
Aimco or the general partner to register, qualify or list any
Aimco common stock issued in exchange for OP Units with the
SEC, with any state securities commissioner, department or
agency, or with any stock exchange. Aimco common stock issued in
exchange for OP Units under the Aimco OP partnership
agreement will contain legends regarding restrictions under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws as Aimco in
good faith determines to be necessary or advisable in order to
ensure compliance with securities laws. In the event of a change
of control of Aimco, holders of HPUs will have redemption rights
similar to those of holders of OP Units.
Partnership
Right To Call Limited Partner Interests
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Aimco OP partnership
agreement, on and after the date on which the aggregate
percentage interests of the limited partners, other than the
special limited partner, are less than one percent (1%), Aimco
OP will have the right, but not the obligation, from time to
time and at any time to redeem any and all outstanding limited
partner interests (other than the special limited partners
interest) by treating any limited partner as if such limited
partner had tendered for redemption under the Aimco OP
partnership agreement the amount of OP Units specified by
the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, by
notice to the limited partner.
Transfers
And Withdrawals
Restrictions On Transfer. The Aimco OP
partnership agreement restricts the transferability of
OP Units. Any transfer or purported transfer of an
OP Unit not made in accordance with the Aimco OP
partnership agreement will
40
be null and void ab initio. Until the expiration of one year
from the date on which an OP Unitholder acquired
OP Units, subject to some exceptions, such
OP Unitholder may not transfer all or any portion of its
OP Units to any transferee without the consent of the
general partner, which consent may be withheld in its sole and
absolute discretion. After the expiration of one year from the
date on which an OP Unitholder acquired OP Units, such
OP Unitholder has the right to transfer all or any portion
of its OP Units to any person, subject to the satisfaction
of specific conditions specified in the Aimco OP partnership
agreement, including the general partners right of first
refusal.
It is a condition to any transfer (whether or not such transfer
is effected before or after the one year holding period) that
the transferee assumes by operation of law or express agreement
all of the obligations of the transferor limited partner under
the Aimco OP partnership agreement with respect to such
OP Units, and no such transfer (other than under a
statutory merger or consolidation wherein all obligations and
liabilities of the transferor partner are assumed by a successor
corporation by operation of law) will relieve the transferor
partner of its obligations under the Aimco OP partnership
agreement without the approval of the general partner, in its
sole and absolute discretion.
In connection with any transfer of OP Units, the general
partner will have the right to receive an opinion of counsel
reasonably satisfactory to it to the effect that the proposed
transfer may be effected without registration under the
Securities Act, and will not otherwise violate any federal or
state securities laws or regulations applicable to Aimco OP or
the OP Units transferred.
No transfer by a limited partner of its OP Units (including
any redemption or any acquisition of OP Units by the
general partner or by Aimco OP) may be made to any person if
(i) in the opinion of legal counsel for Aimco OP, it would
result in Aimco OP being treated as an association taxable as a
corporation, or (ii) such transfer is effectuated through
an established securities market or a
secondary market (or the substantial equivalent
thereof) within the meaning of Section 7704 of the
Code.
HPUs. HPUs are subject to different
restrictions on transfer. Individuals may not transfer HPUs
except to a family member (or a family-owned entity) or in the
event of their death.
Substituted Limited Partners. No limited
partner will have the right to substitute a transferee as a
limited partner in its place. A transferee of the interest of a
limited partner may be admitted as a substituted limited partner
only with the consent of the general partner, which consent may
be given or withheld by the general partner in its sole and
absolute discretion. If the general partner, in its sole and
absolute discretion, does not consent to the admission of any
permitted transferee as a substituted limited partner, such
transferee will be considered an assignee for purposes of the
Aimco OP partnership agreement. An assignee will be entitled to
all the rights of an assignee of a limited partnership interest
under the Delaware Act, including the right to receive
distributions from Aimco OP and the share of Net Income, Net
Losses and other items of income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit of Aimco OP attributable to the OP Units assigned to
such transferee and the rights to transfer the OP Units
provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, but will not be
deemed to be a holder of OP Units for any other purpose
under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, and will not be
entitled to effect a consent or vote with respect to such
OP Units on any matter presented to the limited partners
for approval (such right to consent or vote, to the extent
provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement or under the
Delaware Act, fully remaining with the transferor limited
partner).
Withdrawals. No limited partner may withdraw
from Aimco OP other than as a result of a permitted transfer of
all of such limited partners OP Units in accordance
with the Aimco OP partnership agreement, with respect to which
the transferee becomes a substituted limited partner, or under a
redemption (or acquisition by Aimco) of all of such limited
partners OP Units.
Restrictions on the general partner. The
general partner may not transfer any of its general partner
interest or withdraw from Aimco OP unless (i) the limited
partners consent or (ii) immediately after a merger of the
general partner into another entity, substantially all of the
assets of the surviving entity, other than the general
partnership interest in Aimco OP held by the general partner,
are contributed to Aimco OP as a capital contribution in
exchange for OP Units.
41
Amendment
of the Partnership Agreement
By the General Partner Without the Consent of the Limited
Partners. The general partner has the power,
without the consent of the limited partners, to amend the Aimco
OP partnership agreement as may be required to facilitate or
implement any of the following purposes: (1) to add to the
obligations of the general partner or surrender any right or
power granted to the general partner or any affiliate of the
general partner for the benefit of the limited partners;
(2) to reflect the admission, substitution or withdrawal of
partners or the termination of Aimco OP in accordance with the
partnership agreement; (3) to reflect a change that is of
an inconsequential nature and does not adversely affect the
limited partners in any material respect, or to cure any
ambiguity, correct or supplement any provision in the
partnership agreement not inconsistent with law or with other
provisions, or make other changes with respect to matters
arising under the partnership agreement that will not be
inconsistent with law or with the provisions of the partnership
agreement; (4) to satisfy any requirements, conditions or
guidelines contained in any order, directive, opinion, ruling or
regulation of a federal or state agency or contained in federal
or state law; (5) to reflect such changes as are reasonably
necessary for Aimco to maintain its status as a REIT; and
(6) to modify the manner in which capital accounts are
computed (but only to the extent set forth in the definition of
Capital Account in the Aimco OP partnership
agreement or contemplated by the Code or the Regulations).
With the Consent of the Limited
Partners. Amendments to the Aimco OP partnership
agreement may be proposed by the general partner or by holders
of a majority of the outstanding OP Units and other classes
of units that have the same voting rights as holders of
OP Units, excluding the special limited partner. Following
such proposal, the general partner will submit any proposed
amendment to the limited partners. The general partner will seek
the written consent of a majority in interest of the limited
partners on the proposed amendment or will call a meeting to
vote thereon and to transact any other business that the general
partner may deem appropriate.
Procedures
for Actions and Consents of Partners
Meetings of the partners may be called by the general partner
and will be called upon the receipt by the general partner of a
written request by a majority in interest of the limited
partners. Notice of any such meeting will be given to all
partners not less than seven (7) days nor more than thirty
(30) days prior to the date of such meeting. Partners may
vote in person or by proxy at such meeting. Each meeting of
partners will be conducted by the general partner or such other
person as the general partner may appoint under such rules for
the conduct of the meeting as the general partner or such other
person deems appropriate in its sole and absolute discretion.
Whenever the vote or consent of partners is permitted or
required under the partnership agreement, such vote or consent
may be given at a meeting of partners or may be given by written
consent. Any action required or permitted to be taken at a
meeting of the partners may be taken without a meeting if a
written consent setting forth the action so taken is signed by
partners holding a majority of outstanding OP Units (or
such other percentage as is expressly required by the Aimco OP
partnership agreement for the action in question).
Records
and Accounting; Fiscal Year
The Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the general partner
to keep or cause to be kept at the principal office of Aimco OP
those records and documents required to be maintained by the
Delaware Act and other books and records deemed by the general
partner to be appropriate with respect to Aimco OPs
business. The books of Aimco OP will be maintained, for
financial and tax reporting purposes, on an accrual basis in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or on
such other basis as the general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate. To the extent permitted by sound
accounting practices and principles, Aimco OP, the general
partner and Aimco may operate with integrated or consolidated
accounting records, operations and principles. The fiscal year
of Aimco OP is the calendar year.
Reports
As soon as practicable, but in no event later than one hundred
and five (105) days after the close of each calendar
quarter and each fiscal year, the general partner will make
available to limited partners (which may be done by filing a
report with the SEC) a report containing financial statements of
Aimco OP, or of Aimco if such statements are prepared solely on
a consolidated basis with Aimco, for such calendar quarter or
fiscal year, as the
42
case may be, presented in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and such other information as may be
required by applicable law or regulation or as the general
partner determines to be appropriate. Statements included in
quarterly reports are not audited. Statements included in annual
reports are audited by a nationally recognized firm of
independent public accountants selected by the general partner.
Tax
Matters Partner
The general partner is the tax matters partner of
Aimco OP for United States Federal income tax purposes. The tax
matters partner is authorized, but not required, to take certain
actions on behalf of Aimco OP with respect to tax matters. In
addition, the general partner will arrange for the preparation
and timely filing of all returns with respect to partnership
income, gains, deductions, losses and other items required of
Aimco OP for United States Federal and state income tax purposes
and will use all reasonable effort to furnish, within ninety
(90) days of the close of each taxable year, the tax
information reasonably required by limited partners for United
States Federal and state income tax reporting purposes. The
limited partners will promptly provide the general partner with
such information as may be reasonably requested by the general
partner from time to time.
Dissolution
and Winding Up
Dissolution. Aimco OP will dissolve, and its
affairs will be wound up, upon the first to occur of any of the
following (each a liquidating event): (i) an
event of withdrawal, as defined in the Delaware Act (including,
without limitation, bankruptcy), of the sole general partner
unless, within ninety (90) days after the withdrawal, a
majority in interest (as such phrase is used in
Section 17-801(3)
of the Delaware Act) of the remaining partners agree in writing,
in their sole and absolute discretion, to continue the business
of Aimco OP and to the appointment, effective as of the date of
withdrawal, of a successor general partner; (ii) an
election to dissolve Aimco OP made by the general partner in its
sole and absolute discretion, with or without the consent of the
limited partners; (iii) entry of a decree of judicial
dissolution of Aimco OP under the provisions of the Delaware
Act; (iv) the occurrence of a Terminating Capital
Transaction; or (v) the redemption (or acquisition by
Aimco, the general partner
and/or the
special limited partner) of all OP Units other than
OP Units held by the general partner or the special limited
partner.
Winding Up. Upon the occurrence of a
liquidating event, Aimco OP will continue solely for the
purposes of winding up its affairs in an orderly manner,
liquidating its assets and satisfying the claims of its
creditors and partners. The general partner (or, in the event
that there is no remaining general partner or the general
partner has dissolved, become bankrupt within the meaning of the
Delaware Act or ceased to operate, any person elected by a
majority in interest of the limited partners) will be
responsible for overseeing the winding up and dissolution of
Aimco OP and will take full account of Aimco OPs
liabilities and property, and Aimco OP property will be
liquidated as promptly as is consistent with obtaining the fair
value thereof, and the proceeds therefrom (which may, to the
extent determined by the general partner, include Aimco stock)
will be applied and distributed in the following order:
(i) first, to the satisfaction of all of Aimco OPs
debts and liabilities to creditors other than the partners and
their assignees (whether by payment or the making of reasonable
provision for payment thereof); (ii) second, to the
satisfaction of all Aimco OPs debts and liabilities to the
general partner (whether by payment or the making of reasonable
provision for payment thereof), including, but not limited to,
amounts due as reimbursements under the partnership agreement;
(ii) third, to the satisfaction of all of Aimco OPs
debts and liabilities to the other partners and any assignees
(whether by payment or the making of reasonable provision for
payment thereof); (iv) fourth, to the satisfaction of all
liquidation preferences of outstanding Partnership Preferred
Units, if any; and (v) the balance, if any, to the general
partner, the limited partners and any assignees in accordance
with and in proportion to their positive capital account
balances, after giving effect to all contributions,
distributions and allocations for all periods. In the event of a
liquidation, holders of HPUs will be specially allocated items
of income and gain in an amount sufficient to cause the capital
account of such holder to be equal to that of a holder of an
equal number of OP Units.
43
DESCRIPTION
OF AIMCO COMMON STOCK
General
Aimcos charter authorizes the issuance of up to
422,157,736 shares of common stock. As of November 12,
2010, 117,033,419 shares were issued and outstanding. The
Aimco common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol
AIV. Computershare Limited serves as transfer agent
and registrar of the Aimco common stock. On November 12,
2010, the closing price of the Aimco common stock on the NYSE
was $24.63. The following table shows the high and low reported
sales prices and dividends paid per share of Aimcos common
stock in the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 (through November 12, 2010)
|
|
$
|
25.61
|
|
|
$
|
21.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
22.82
|
|
|
|
18.12
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
24.21
|
|
|
|
18.14
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
19.17
|
|
|
|
15.01
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
17.09
|
|
|
|
11.80
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
15.91
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
11.10
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
December 31, 2008(1)
|
|
|
43.67
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
September 30, 2008(1)
|
|
|
42.28
|
|
|
|
29.25
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
41.24
|
|
|
|
33.33
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
41.11
|
|
|
|
29.91
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2008, Aimcos Board of Directors declared special
dividends which were paid part in cash and part in shares of
Common Stock as further discussed in Note 11 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 10, 2010 and filed with the SEC on
September 10, 2010, which is incorporated herein by
reference. Aimcos Board of Directors declared the
dividends to address taxable gains from 2008 property sales. |
Aimco adopted the Apartment Investment and Management Company
1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or the 1997 Plan, to
attract and retain officers, key employees and independent
directors. The 1997 Plan reserved for issuance a maximum of
20 million shares, which may be in the form of incentive
stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock,
or other types of awards as authorized under the 1997 Plan. The
1997 Plan expired on April 24, 2007. On April 30,
2007, the 2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or the 2007 Plan,
was approved as successor to the 1997 Plan. The 2007 Plan
reserves for issuance a maximum of 4.1 million shares,
which may be in the form of incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, or other types
of awards as authorized under the 2007 Plan.
Holders of Aimco common stock are entitled to receive dividends,
when and as declared by Aimcos board of directors, out of
funds legally available therefor. The holders of shares of
common stock, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of
Aimco, are entitled to receive ratably any assets remaining
after payment in full of all liabilities of Aimco and the
liquidation preferences of preferred stock. The shares of common
stock possess ordinary voting rights for the election of
directors and in respect of other corporate matters, each share
entitling the holder thereof to one vote. Holders of shares of
common stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the
election of directors, which means that holders of more than 50%
of the shares of common stock voting for the election of
directors can elect all of the directors if they choose to do so
and the holders of the remaining shares cannot elect any
directors. Holders of shares of common stock do not have
preemptive rights, which means they have no right to acquire any
additional shares of common stock that may be issued by Aimco at
a subsequent date.
44
Outstanding
Classes Of Preferred Stock
Aimcos charter authorizes 88,429,764 shares of
preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. Aimco is
authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more
classes or subclasses, with such designations, preferences,
conversion and other rights, voting powers, restriction,
limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms and
conditions of redemption, in each case, if any as are permitted
by Maryland law and as the Aimco Board of Directors may
determine by resolution. As of September 30, 2010, Aimco
had issued and outstanding the following classes of preferred
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Preference
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
Class
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Class G Cumulative Preferred Stock(1)
|
|
|
4,050,000
|
|
|
|
4,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.586
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Class T Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.484
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Class V Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Class Y Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.492
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Series A CRA Perpetual Preferred Stock(2)
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
2,274.44
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 7, 2010, Aimco redeemed all of the 4,050,000
outstanding shares of Class G Cumulative Preferred Stock.
The redemption was funded primarily from the proceeds of
Aimcos issuance during September 2010 of 4,000,000
shares of its Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
During 2006, Aimco sold 200 shares of Series A
Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value per share, or the CRA Preferred Stock, with
a liquidation preference of $500,000 per share, for net proceeds
of $97.5 million. For the period from the date of original
issuance through March 31, 2015, the dividend rate is a
variable rate per annum equal to the Three-Month LIBOR Rate (as
defined in the articles supplementary designating the CRA
Preferred Stock) plus 1.25%, calculated as of the beginning of
each quarterly dividend period. The rate at September 30,
2010 was 1.78%. Upon liquidation, holders of the CRA Preferred
Stock are entitled to a preference of $500,000 per share, plus
an amount equal to accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends,
whether or not earned or declared. The CRA Preferred Stock ranks
prior to the Aimco common stock and on the same level as
Aimcos outstanding shares of preferred stock with respect
to the payment of dividends and the distribution of amounts upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The CRA Preferred Stock
is not redeemable prior to June 30, 2011, except in limited
circumstances related to REIT qualification. On and after
June 30, 2011, the CRA Preferred Stock is redeemable for
cash, in whole or from time to time in part, at Aimcos
option, at a price per share equal to the liquidation
preference, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, if
any, to the redemption date. |
Ranking. Each authorized class of preferred
stock ranks, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, (a) prior
or senior to the common stock and any other class or series of
capital stock of Aimco if the holders of that class of preferred
stock are entitled to the receipt of dividends or amounts
distributable upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
in preference or priority to the holders of shares of such class
or series (Junior Stock); (b) on a parity with
the other authorized classes of preferred stock and any other
class or series of capital stock of Aimco if the holders of such
class or series of stock and that class of preferred stock are
entitled to receive dividends and amounts distributable upon
liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
in proportion to their respective amounts of accrued and unpaid
dividends per share or liquidation preferences, without
preference or priority of one over the other (Parity
Stock); and (c) junior to any class or series of
capital stock of Aimco if the holders of such class or series
are entitled to receive dividends and amounts distributable upon
liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
in preference or priority to the holders of that class of
preferred stock (Senior Stock).
Dividends. Holders of each authorized class of
preferred stock are entitled to receive, when and as declared by
Aimcos board of directors, out of funds legally available
for payment, quarterly cash dividends in the amount per share
set forth in the table above under the heading, Quarterly
Dividend Per Share. The dividends are
45
cumulative from the date of original issue, whether or not in
any dividend period or periods Aimco declares any dividends or
have funds legally available for the payment of such dividend.
Holders of preferred stock are not entitled to receive any
dividends in excess of cumulative dividends on the preferred
stock. No interest, or sum of money in lieu of interest, shall
be payable in respect of any dividend payment or payments on the
preferred stock that may be in arrears.
When dividends are not paid in full upon any class of preferred
stock, or a sum sufficient for such payment is not set apart,
all dividends declared upon that class of preferred stock and
any shares of Parity Stock will be declared ratably in
proportion to the respective amounts of dividends accumulated,
accrued and unpaid on that class of preferred stock and
accumulated, accrued and unpaid on such Parity Stock. Except as
set forth in the preceding sentence, unless dividends on each
class of preferred stock equal to the full amount of
accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends have been or
contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum
sufficient for the payment thereof has been or contemporaneously
is set apart for such payment, for all past dividend periods, no
dividends may be declared or paid or set apart for payment by
Aimco and no other distribution of cash or other property may be
declared or made, directly or indirectly, by Aimco with respect
to any shares of Parity Stock. Unless dividends equal to the
full amount of all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends on
each class of preferred stock have been declared and paid, or
declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been
set apart for such payment, for all past dividend periods, no
dividends (other than dividends or distributions paid in shares
of Junior Stock or options, warrants or rights to subscribe for
or purchase shares of Junior Stock) may be declared or paid or
set apart for payment by Aimco and no other distribution of cash
or other property may be declared or made, directly or
indirectly, by Aimco with respect to any shares of Junior Stock,
nor may any shares of Junior Stock be redeemed, purchased or
otherwise acquired (other than a redemption, purchase or other
acquisition of common stock made for purposes of an employee
incentive or benefit plan of Aimco or any subsidiary) for any
consideration (or any monies be paid to or made available for a
sinking fund for the redemption of any shares of any such
stock), directly or indirectly, by Aimco (except by conversion
into or exchange for shares of Junior Stock, or options,
warrants or rights to subscribe for or purchase shares of Junior
Stock), nor shall any other cash or other property be paid or
distributed to or for the benefit of holders of shares of Junior
Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
paragraph, Aimco is not prohibited from (1) declaring or
paying or setting apart for payment any dividend or distribution
on any shares of Parity Stock or (2) redeeming, purchasing
or otherwise acquiring any Parity Stock, in each case, if such
declaration, payment, redemption, purchase or other acquisition
is necessary to maintain Aimcos qualification as a REIT.
Liquidation Preference. Upon any voluntary or
involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco,
before it makes or sets apart any payment or distribution for
the holders of any shares of Junior Stock, the holders of each
class of preferred stock are entitled to receive a liquidation
preference per share in the amount set forth above under the
heading, Liquidation Preference Per Share, plus an
amount equal to all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends
(whether or not formed or declared) to the date of final
distribution to such holders. Holders of each class of preferred
stock are not entitled to any further payment. Until the holders
of each class of preferred stock have been paid their respective
liquidation preferences in full, plus an amount equal to all
accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not earned
or declared) to the date of final distribution to such holders,
no payment may be made to any holder of Junior Stock upon the
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco. If, upon any
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, its assets, or
proceeds thereof, distributable among the holders of preferred
stock are insufficient to pay in full the preference described
above for any class of preferred stock and any liquidating
payments on any other shares of any class or series of Parity
Stock, then such proceeds shall be distributed among the holders
of such class of preferred stock and holders of all other shares
of any class or series of Parity Stock ratably in the same
proportion as the respective amounts that would be payable on
such class of preferred stock and any such Parity Stock if all
amounts payable thereon were paid in full. A voluntary or
involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco does
not include its consolidation or merger with one or more
corporations, a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of
its assets, or a statutory share exchange. Upon any liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of Aimco, after payment shall have
been made in full to the holders of preferred stock, any other
series or class or classes of Junior Stock shall be entitled to
receive any and all assets remaining to be paid or distributed,
and the holders of each class of preferred stock and any Parity
Stock shall not be entitled to share therein.
46
Redemption. Except as described below and in
certain limited circumstances, including circumstances relating
to maintaining Aimcos ability to qualify as a REIT, Aimco
may not redeem the shares of preferred stock. On or after the
dates set forth in the table below, Aimco may, at its option,
redeem shares of the classes of preferred stock set forth below,
in whole or from time to time in part, at a cash redemption
price equal to the percentage of the liquidation preference for
that class of preferred stock indicated under the heading,
Price, plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid
dividends, if any, to the date fixed for redemption. The
redemption price for each class of non-convertible preferred
stock (other than any portion thereof consisting of accumulated,
accrued and unpaid dividends) is payable solely with the
proceeds from the sale of equity securities by Aimco or Aimco OP
(whether or not such sale occurs concurrently with such
redemption). For purposes of the preceding sentence,
capital shares means any common stock, preferred
stock, depositary shares, partnership or other interests,
participations or other ownership interests (however designated)
and any rights (other than debt securities convertible into or
exchangeable at the option of the holder for equity securities
(unless and to the extent such debt securities are subsequently
converted into capital stock)) or options to purchase any of the
foregoing securities issued by Aimco or Aimco OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Date
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Class G Cumulative Preferred Stock(1)
|
|
July 15, 2008
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Class T Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
July 31, 2008
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
March 24, 2009
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Class V Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
September 29, 2009
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Class Y Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
December 21, 2009
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Series A CRA Perpetual Preferred Stock
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 7, 2010 Aimco redeemed all of the outstanding
Class G Cumulative Preferred Stock. |
Except as otherwise described in this information
statement/prospectus, none of the authorized classes of
preferred stock have any stated maturity or are subject to any
sinking find or mandatory redemption provisions.
Conversion. The shares of convertible
preferred stock are convertible at any time, at the option of
the holder, into a number of shares of common stock obtained by
dividing its liquidation preference (excluding any accumulated,
accrued and unpaid dividends) by the conversion price set forth
in the table above. In the case of shares called for redemption,
conversion rights will terminate at the close of business on the
date fixed for such redemption, unless Aimco defaults in making
such redemption payment. Each conversion will be deemed to have
been effected immediately prior to the close of business on the
date on which the holder surrenders certificates representing
shares of preferred stock and Aimco receives notice and any
applicable instruments of transfer and any required taxes. The
conversion will be at the conversion price in effect at such
time and on such date unless the stock transfer books of Aimco
are closed on that date, in which event such person or persons
will be deemed to have become such holder or holders of record
at the close of business on the next succeeding day on which
such stock transfer books are open, but such conversion will be
at the conversion price in effect on the date on which such
shares were surrendered and such notice received by Aimco. No
fractional shares of common stock or scrip representing
fractions of a share of common stock will be issued upon
conversion of shares of preferred stock. Instead of any
fractional interest in a share of common stock that would
otherwise be deliverable upon the conversion of any share of
preferred stock, Aimco will pay to the holder of such shares an
amount in cash based upon the closing price of the common stock
on the trading day immediately preceding the date of conversion.
If more than one share of preferred stock is surrendered for
conversion at one time by the same holder, the number of full
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion thereof will be
computed on the basis of the aggregate number of shares of
preferred stock so converted. Except as otherwise required,
Aimco will make no payment or allowance for unpaid dividends,
whether or not in arrears, on converted shares or for dividends
(other than dividends on the common stock the record date for
which is after the conversion date and which Aimco shall pay in
the ordinary course to the record holder as of the record date)
on the common stock issued upon such conversion. Holders of
preferred stock at the close of business on a record date for
the payment of dividends on the preferred stock will be entitled
to receive an amount equal to the dividend payable on such
shares on the corresponding dividend payment date
notwithstanding the conversion of such shares following such
record date.
Each conversion price is subject to adjustment upon the
occurrence of certain events, including: (i) if Aimco
(A) pays a dividend or makes a distribution on its capital
stock in shares of common stock, (B) subdivides its
outstanding common stock into a greater number of shares,
(C) combines its outstanding common stock into a
47
smaller number of shares or (D) issues any shares of
capital stock by reclassification of its outstanding common
stock; (ii) if Aimco issues rights, options or warrants to
holders of common stock entitling them to subscribe for or
purchase common stock at a price per share less than the fair
market value thereof; and (iii) if Aimco makes a
distribution on its common stock other than in cash or shares of
common stock.
Conversion of preferred stock will be permitted only to the
extent that such conversion would not result in a violation of
the ownership restrictions set forth in Aimcos charter.
Voting Rights. Holders of shares of the
authorized classes of preferred stock do not have any voting
rights, except as set forth below and except as otherwise
required by applicable law.
If and whenever dividends on any shares of any class of
preferred stock or any series or class of Parity Stock are in
arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not
consecutive, the number of directors then constituting
Aimcos board of directors will be increased by two, if not
already increased by reason of similar types of provisions with
respect to shares of Parity Stock of any other class or series
which is entitled to similar voting rights (the Voting
Preferred Stock), and the holders of shares of that class
of preferred stock, together with the holders of shares of all
other Voting Preferred Stock then entitled to exercise similar
voting rights, voting as a single class regardless of series,
will be entitled to vote for the election of the two additional
directors of Aimco at any annual meeting of stockholders or at a
special meeting of the holders of that class of preferred stock
and of the Voting Preferred Stock called for that purpose.
Whenever dividends in arrears on outstanding shares of Voting
Preferred Stock shall have been paid and dividends thereon for
the current quarterly dividend period have been paid or declared
and set apart for payment, then the right of the holders of the
Voting Preferred Stock to elect the additional two directors
shall cease and the terms of office of the directors shall
terminate and the number of directors constituting Aimcos
board of directors shall be reduced accordingly. Holders of
Class W Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, voting as a
single class, are also entitled to elect one director of Aimco
if and whenever (i) for two consecutive quarterly dividend
periods, Aimco fails to pay at least $0.45 per share in
dividends on the common stock or (ii) Aimco fails to pay a
quarterly dividend on that class of preferred stock, whether or
not earned or declared.
The affirmative vote or consent of at least
662/3%
of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the
outstanding shares of each class of preferred stock and the
holders of all other classes or series of Parity Stock entitled
to vote on such matters, voting as a single class, will be
required to (1) authorize, create, increase the authorized
amount of, or issue any shares of any class of Senior Stock or
any security convertible into shares of any class of Senior
Stock, or (2) amend, alter or repeal any provision of, or
add any provision to, Aimcos charter or by-laws, if such
action would materially adversely affect the voting powers,
rights or preferences of the holders of that class of preferred
stock or, with respect to the Class W Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, would convert such preferred stock
into cash or any other security other than Preferred Stock with
terms and provisions equivalent to those set forth in the
articles supplementary for such class of preferred stock
(including any amendment, alteration or repeal effected pursuant
to a merger, consolidation, or similar transaction); provided,
however, that no such vote of the holders of that class of
preferred stock shall be required if, at or prior to the time
such amendment, alteration or repeal is to take effect or the
issuance of any such Senior Stock or convertible security is to
be made, as the case may be, provisions are made for the
redemption of all outstanding shares of that class of preferred
stock. The amendment of or supplement to Aimcos charter to
authorize, create, increase or decrease the authorized amount of
or to issue Junior Stock, or any shares of any class of Parity
Stock shall not be deemed to materially adversely affect the
voting powers, rights or preferences of any class of preferred
stock.
Transfer. For Aimco to qualify as a REIT under
the Code, not more than 50% in value of its outstanding capital
stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities)
during the last half of a taxable year and the shares of common
stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during
at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or
during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Because
the Aimco board of directors believes that it is essential for
Aimco to meet the REIT Requirements, the board of directors has
adopted, and the stockholders have approved, provisions of
Aimcos charter restricting the acquisition of shares of
common stock.
Subject to specific exceptions specified in Aimcos
charter, no holder may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of
various attribution and constructive ownership provisions of the
Code and
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act,
48
more than 8.7% (or 15% in the case of specific pension trusts
described in the Code, investment companies registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and
Mr. Considine) of the outstanding shares of common stock
(the Ownership Limit). The board of directors may
waive the Ownership Limit if evidence satisfactory to the board
of directors and Aimcos tax counsel is presented that such
ownership will not then or in the future jeopardize Aimcos
status as a REIT. However, in no event may such holders
direct or indirect ownership of common stock exceed 9.8% of the
total outstanding shares of common stock. As a condition of such
waiver, the board of directors may require opinions of counsel
satisfactory to it
and/or an
undertaking from the applicant with respect to preserving the
REIT status of Aimco. The foregoing restrictions on
transferability and ownership will not apply if the board of
directors determines that it is no longer in the best interests
of Aimco to attempt to qualify, or to continue to quality as a
REIT and a resolution terminating Aimcos status as a REIT
and amending Aimcos charter to remove the foregoing
restrictions is duly adopted by the board of directors and a
majority of Aimcos stockholders. If shares of common stock
in excess of the Ownership Limit, or shares of common stock
which would cause the REIT to be beneficially owned by fewer
than 100 persons, or which would result in Aimco being
closely held, within the meaning of
Section 856(h) of the Code, or which would otherwise result
in Aimco failing to qualify as a REIT, are issued or transferred
to any person, such issuance or transfer shall be null and void
to the intended transferee, and the intended transferee would
acquire no rights to the stock. Shares of common stock
transferred in excess of the Ownership Limit or other applicable
limitations will automatically be transferred to a trust for the
exclusive benefit of one or more qualifying charitable
organizations to be designated by Aimco. Shares transferred to
such trust will remain outstanding, and the trustee of the trust
will have all voting and dividend rights pertaining to such
shares. The trustee of such trust may transfer such shares to a
person whose ownership of such shares does not violate the
Ownership Limit or other applicable limitation. Upon a sale of
such shares by the trustee, the interest of the charitable
beneficiary will terminate, and the sales proceeds would be
paid, first, to the original intended transferee, to the extent
of the lesser of (a) such transferees original
purchase price (or the original market value of such shares if
purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and (b) the price
received by the trustee, and, second, any remainder to the
charitable beneficiary. In addition, shares of stock held in
such trust are purchasable by Aimco for a 90 day period at
a price equal to the lesser of the price paid for the stock by
the original intended transferee (or the original market value
of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and
the market price for the stock on the date that Aimco determines
to purchase the stock. The 90 day period commences on the
date of the violative transfer or the date that the board of
directors determines in good faith that a violative transfer has
occurred, whichever is later. All certificates representing
shares of common stock bear a legend referring to the
restrictions described above.
All persons who own, directly or by virtue of the attribution
provisions of the Code and
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, more than a specified percentage of the
outstanding shares of common stock must file an affidavit with
Aimco containing the information specified in Aimcos
charter within 30 days after January 1 of each year. In
addition, each stockholder shall upon demand be required to
disclose to Aimco in writing such information with respect to
the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as the
board of directors deems necessary to comply with the provisions
of the Code applicable to a REIT or to comply with the
requirements of any taxing authority or governmental agency.
The ownership limitations may have the effect of precluding
acquisition of control of Aimco by specific parties unless the
board of directors determines that maintenance of REIT status is
no longer in the best interests of Aimco.
49
COMPARISON
OF AIMCO OP UNITS AND AIMCO COMMON STOCK
Set forth below is a comparison of the OP Units to the
Aimco common stock.
|
|
|
OP Units
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Nature of Investment
|
The OP Units constitute equity interests entitling each holder
to his or her pro rata share of cash distributions made from
Available Cash (as such term is defined in the Aimco OP
partnership agreement) to the partners of Aimco OP, a Delaware
limited partnership.
|
|
The common stock constitutes equity interests in Aimco, a
Maryland corporation.
|
|
Voting Rights
|
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, limited partners have
voting rights only with respect to certain limited matters such
as certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain
transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings,
an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers
by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the
admission of a successor general partner.
|
|
Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder
thereof to one vote on all matters submitted to stockholders for
a vote, including the election of directors. Holders of common
stock have the right to vote on, among other things, a merger of
Aimco, amendments to the Aimco charter and the dissolution of
Aimco. Certain amendments to the Aimco charter require the
affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of votes entitled
to be cast on the matter. The Aimco charter permits the Aimco
Board of Directors to classify and issue capital stock in one or
more series having voting power which may differ from that of
the common stock.
|
|
|
Under Maryland law, a consolidation, merger, share exchange or
transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Aimco
requires the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of all
of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. With respect to
each of these transactions, only the holders of common stock are
entitled to vote on the matters. No approval of the stockholders
is required for the sale of less than all or substantially all
of Aimcos assets.
|
|
|
Maryland law provides that the Aimco Board of Directors must
obtain the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter in order to dissolve Aimco.
Only the holders of common stock are entitled to vote on
Aimcos dissolution.
|
|
Distributions/Dividends
|
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership
preferred units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the
general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all,
or such portion as the general partner may in its sole and
absolute discretion determine, of Available Cash (as such term
is defined in the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP
during such quarter to the general partner, the Special Limited
Partner and the holders of OP Units and HPUs on the record date
established by the general partner with respect to such quarter,
in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco OP on
such record date. Holders of any Partnership Preferred Units
currently issued and which may be issued in the future may have
priority over the general partner, the special limited
|
|
Holders of the common stock are entitled to receive dividends
when and as declared by the Aimco Board of Directors, out of
funds legally available therefor. Under the REIT rules, Aimco is
required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain
dividends) to its stockholders in an amount at least equal to
(A) the sum of (i) 90% of Aimcos REIT taxable
income (computed without regard to the dividends paid
deduction and Aimcos net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the
net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus
(B) the sum of certain items of noncash income. See
Material United States Federal Income Tax Matters.
|
50
|
|
|
OP Units
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
partner and holders of OP Units and HPUs with respect to
distributions of Available Cash, distributions upon liquidation
or other distributions. See Description of OP
Units Distributions. The general partner in
its sole and absolute discretion may distribute to the holders
of OP Units and HPUs Available Cash on a more frequent basis and
provide for an appropriate record date. The partnership
agreement requires the general partner to take such reasonable
efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion
and consistent with the REIT Requirements, to cause Aimco OP to
distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to
transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder
dividends that will(i) satisfy the requirements for
qualifying as a REIT under the Code, and the Treasury
Regulations and (ii) avoid any United States Federal income
or excise tax liability of Aimco. See Description of OP
Units Distributions.
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Transferability/Redemption
|
There is no public market for the OP Units and the OP Units are
not listed on any securities exchange.
|
|
The common stock is transferable subject to the Ownership Limit
set forth in the Aimco charter. The common stock is listed on
the NYSE.
|
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, until the expiration
of one year from the date on which a holder acquired OP Units,
subject to certain exceptions, such OP Unitholder may not
transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any transferee
without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be
withheld in its sole and absolute discretion. After the
expiration of one year, such OP Unitholder has the right to
transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any person,
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions specified in
the partnership agreement, including the general partners
right of first refusal. See Description of OP
Units Transfers and Withdrawals. After the
first anniversary of becoming a holder of OP Units, a holder has
the right, subject to the terms and conditions of the
partnership agreement, to require Aimco OP to redeem all or a
portion of such holders OP Units in exchange for shares of
common stock or a cash amount equal to the value of such shares,
as Aimco OP may elect. See Description of OP
Units Redemption Rights of Qualifying
Parties. Upon receipt of a notice of redemption, Aimco OP
may, in its sole and absolute discretion but subject to the
restrictions on the ownership of common stock imposed under the
Aimco charter and the transfer restrictions and other
limitations thereof, elect to cause Aimco to acquire some or all
of the tendered OP Units in exchange for common stock, based on
an exchange ratio of one share of common stock for each OP Unit,
subject to adjustment as provided in the partnership agreement.
|
|
|
51
COMPARISON
OF USRP UNITS AND AIMCO OP UNITS
The rights of USRP limited partners are currently governed by
the Delaware Act and the USRP partnership agreement. The rights
of the limited partners of Aimco OP are currently governed by
the Delaware Act and the Aimco OP partnership agreement.
The information below highlights a number of the significant
differences between USRP Units and Aimco OP Units. These
comparisons are intended to assist USRP limited partners in
understanding how their investment will be changed after
completion of the merger, if they elect to receive OP Units
in lieu of cash with respect to the merger.
|
|
|
UNITS
|
|
OP Units
|
|
Nature of Investment
|
The USRP Units constitute equity interests entitling each
partner to its pro rata share of distributions to be made to the
partners of USRP.
|
|
The OP Units constitute equity interests entitling each holder
to his or her pro rata share of cash distributions made from
Available Cash (as such term is defined in the partnership
agreement) to the partners of Aimco OP.
|
|
Voting Rights
|
With limited exceptions, the USRP partnership agreement may be
amended upon the vote of limited partners holding more than 50%
of the outstanding limited partnership units. Limited partners
holding more than fifty percent of the units may remove a
general partner. If a general partner withdraws or is otherwise
removed, USRP will be dissolved, unless(a) the remaining
general partner elects to continue USRPs business and
either(i) limited partners holding more than fifty percent
of the limited partnership units elect a substitute general
partner that meets the requirements for continued qualification
of USRP as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes or
(ii) the remaining general partner certifies to the limited
partners that USRP will meet the requirements for continued
qualification as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes
without the admission of a substitute general partner,
or(b) if there is no remaining general partner, all of the
partners agree in writing to continue the business of USRP. An
affiliate of the general partner of USRP currently owns a
majority of USRPs Units.
|
|
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, limited partners have
voting rights only with respect to certain limited matters such
as certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain
transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings,
an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers
by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the
admission of a successor general partner.
|
|
|
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner
has the power to effect the acquisition, sale, transfer,
exchange or other disposition of any assets of Aimco OP
(including, but not limited to, the exercise or grant of any
conversion, option, privilege or subscription right or any other
right available in connection with any assets at any time held
by Aimco OP) or the merger, consolidation, reorganization or
other combination of Aimco OP with or into another entity, all
without the consent of the OP Unitholders.
|
52
|
|
|
UNITS
|
|
OP Units
|
|
|
|
The general partner may cause the dissolution of Aimco OP by an
event of withdrawal, as defined in the Delaware Act
(including, without limitation, bankruptcy), unless, within
90 days after the withdrawal, holders of a majority
in interest, as defined in the Delaware Act, agree in
writing, in their sole and absolute discretion, to continue the
business of Aimco OP and to the appointment of a successor
general partner. The general partner may elect to dissolve Aimco
OP in its sole and absolute discretion, with or without the
consent of the OP Unitholders. OP Unitholders cannot remove the
general partner of Aimco OP with or without cause.
|
|
Distributions
|
All Net Cash from Operations (as such term is defined in the
USRP partnership agreement) of USRP for each fiscal year will be
distributed quarterly in the manner specified in the USRP
partnership agreement. Subject to certain exceptions set forth
in the USRP partnership agreement, all Sale or Refinancing
Proceeds (as such term is defined in the USRP partnership
agreement) will be distributed within 135 days of the sale
or refinancing in the manner specified in the USRP partnership
agreement.
|
|
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership
preferred units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the
general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all,
or such portion as the general partner may in its sole and
absolute discretion determine, of Available Cash (as such term
is defined in the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP
during such quarter to the general partner, the special limited
partner and the holders of OP Units and HPUs on the record date
established by the general partner with respect to such quarter,
in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco OP on
such record date. Holders of any partnership preferred units
currently issued and which may be issued in the future may have
priority over the general partner, the special limited partner
and holders of OP Units and HPUs with respect to distributions
of Available Cash, distributions upon liquidation or other
distributions. See Description of OP Units
Distributions. The general partner in its sole and
absolute discretion may distribute to the holders of OP Units
and HPUs Available Cash on a more frequent basis and provide for
an appropriate record date. The partnership agreement requires
the general partner to take such reasonable efforts, as
determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion and
consistent with the REIT requirements, to cause Aimco OP to
distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to
transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder
dividends that will (i) satisfy the requirements for qualifying
as a REIT under the Code, and the Treasury Regulations and (ii)
avoid any United States Federal income or excise tax liability
of Aimco. See Description of OP Units
Distributions.
|
|
Liquidity and Transferability/Redemption
|
There is a limited market for the USRP Units and the USRP Units
are not listed on any securities exchange.
|
|
There is no public market for the OP Units and the OP Units are
not listed on any securities exchange.
|
53
|
|
|
UNITS
|
|
OP Units
|
|
Under the USRP partnership agreement, except with the prior
written consent of the Corporate General Partner or by operation
of law and unless deposited with the Depositary (as such term is
defined in the USRP partnership agreement) under the Depositary
Agreement (as such term is defined in the USRP partnership
agreement), certificates of limited partnership interest, or any
interest evidenced thereby, may not be transferred. The
Corporate General Partners consent to such transfer will
not be withheld unless the Corporate General Partner reasonably
determines that a transfer would result in an adverse change in
the tax status of USRP or would violate Federal or state
securities laws. Depositary receipts evidencing USRP Units are
transferable in the manner and subject to the conditions
provided in the Depositary Agreement. Upon valid transfer and
registration of transfer pursuant to the Depositary Agreement of
any depositary receipt or any USRP Units represented thereby,
the certificates of limited partnership interest represented
thereby (and the interest evidenced by such certificates) will
be deemed to have been assigned from the transferor to the
transferee of all or a portion of such depositary receipt.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no transfer or assignment of any
interest may be made(a) if counsel for USRP is of the
opinion that the transfer would be in violation of any state
securities or blue sky laws or requirements of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. applicable to
USRP, or(b) if it would result in USRP being treated as a
corporation for tax purposes. Any registered owner of USRP Units
may deliver to the Depositary such documents and certificates as
are required under the Depositary Agreement and a duly executed
and acknowledged instrument evidencing the written.
|
|
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, until the expiration
of one year from the date on which a holder acquired OP Units,
subject to certain exceptions, such OP Unitholder may not
transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any transferee
without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be
withheld in its sole and absolute discretion. After the
expiration of one year, such OP Unitholder has the right to
transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any person,
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions specified in
the partnership agreement, including the general partners
right of first refusal. See Description of OP
Units Transfers and Withdrawals. After the
first anniversary of becoming a holder of OP Units, a holder has
the right, subject to the terms and conditions of the
partnership agreement, to require Aimco OP to redeem all or a
portion of such holders OP Units in exchange for shares of
common stock or a cash amount equal to the value of such shares,
as Aimco OP may elect. See Description of OP
Units Redemption Rights of Qualifying Parties.
Upon receipt of a notice of redemption, Aimco OP may, in its
sole and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on
the ownership of common stock imposed under the Aimco charter
and the transfer restrictions and other limitations thereof,
elect to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the tendered OP
Units in exchange for common stock, based on an exchange ratio
of one share of common stock for each OP Unit, subject to
adjustment as provided in the partnership agreement.
|
54
|
|
|
UNITS
|
|
OP Units
|
|
acceptance by such registered owner of all the terms and
provisions of the USRP partnership agreement and may become a
substitute limited partner when such registered
owner(a) signs such number of counterpart signature pages
to the USRP partnership agreement or a power of attorney to the
Corporate General Partner therefor and such other instrument or
instruments, and in such manner, as the Corporate General
Partner determines,(b) pays any and all taxes or
governmental charges due in respect of such substitution,
and(c) pays to the Depositary or USRP an amount equal to
the lesser of(i) the actual, reasonable and necessary costs
and expenses incurred in connection with his substitution as a
limited partner, or (ii) $200 (or such other amount
specified in a notice provided by USRP to the limited partner).
Any person who is an assignee or an interest evidenced by a
limited partnership certificate not deposited with the
Depositary and who has satisfied certain other conditions
specified in the USRP partnership agreement may become a
substitute limited partner when such person fulfills the
requirements specified in clauses(a) through(c) in the
foregoing sentence. Subject to certain exceptions specified in
the USRP partnership agreement, USRP need not recognize for any
purpose any purported transfer of all or any part of the
interest of a limited partner or all or any part of the USRP
Units of an assignee. The USRP partnership agreement contains no
redemption rights.
|
|
|
|
Fiduciary Duty
|
Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership
agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of
loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners.
The USRP partnership agreement provides that the Corporate
General Partner has a fiduciary responsibility for the
safekeeping and use of all funds of the partnership, whether or
not in its immediate possession or control, and shall not employ
or permit another to employ such funds or assets in any manner
except for the exclusive benefit of the partnership. The General
Partners may purchase limited partnership units or USRP Units
for their own account from USRP or from limited partners or
assignees or other holders of limited partnership units of USRP
Units and become limited partners or assignees in respect of
such units or USRP Units. The USRP partnership agreement
expressly limits the liability of the General Partners by
providing that the General Partners will have not liability to
USRP or the limited partners for any loss suffered by USRP that
arises out of any action of inaction of the General Partners if
the General Partners, in good faith, determined that such course
of conduct was in the best interests of USRP and such course of
conduct did not constitute negligence or misconduct of the
General Partners.
|
|
Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership
agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of
loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners.
The Aimco OP partnership agreement expressly authorizes the
general partner to enter into, on behalf of Aimco OP, a right of
first opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance
agreements with various affiliates of Aimco OP and the general
partner, on such terms as the general partner, in its sole and
absolute discretion, believes are advisable. The Aimco OP
partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the
general partner by providing that the general partner, and its
officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in
damages to Aimco OP, the limited partners or assignees for
errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or
omission if the general partner or such director or officer
acted in good faith.
|
55
|
|
|
UNITS
|
|
OP Units
|
|
Investment Policy
|
USRP is engaged in the business of operating and holding real
estate property for investment. In general, the Corporate
General Partner regularly evaluates USRPs property by
considering various factors, such as the partnerships
financial position and real estate and capital markets
conditions. The Corporate General Partner monitors the
propertys specific locale and
sub-market
conditions (including stability of the surrounding
neighborhood), evaluating current trends, competition, new
construction and economic changes. It oversees the operating
performance of the property and evaluates the physical
improvement requirements. In addition, the financing structure
for the property (including any prepayment penalties), tax
implications, availability of attractive mortgage financing to a
purchaser, and the investment climate are all considered. Any of
these factors, and possibly others, could potentially contribute
to any decision by the Corporate General Partner to sell,
refinance, upgrade with capital improvements or hold the
property.
|
|
Aimco OP was formed to engage in the acquisition, ownership,
management and redevelopment of apartment properties. Although
it holds all of its properties for investment, Aimco OP may sell
properties when they do not meet its investment criteria or are
located in areas that it believes do not justify a continued
investment when compared to alternative uses for capital. Its
portfolio management strategy includes property acquisitions and
dispositions to concentrate its portfolio in its target markets.
It may market for sale certain properties that are inconsistent
with this long-term investment strategy. Additionally, from time
to time, Aimco OP may market certain properties that are
consistent with this strategy but offer attractive returns.
Aimco OP may use its share of the net proceeds from such
dispositions to, among other things, reduce debt, fund capital
expenditures on existing assets, fund acquisitions, and for
other operating needs and corporate purposes.
|
Compensation
and Distributions
USRP. USRP has no employees and depends on the
Corporate General Partner and its affiliates for the management
and administration of all partnership activities. The USRP
partnership agreement provides that the Corporate General
Partner and its affiliates receive 5% of gross receipts from all
of USRPs properties as compensation for providing property
management services, and also provides that the Corporate
General Partner and its affiliates receive certain payments for
other services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred on
behalf of USRP.
In addition, under the USRP partnership agreement, (a) Net
Cash From Operations (as defined in the USRP partnership
agreement) of USRP for each fiscal year is distributed quarterly
within 45 days after the close of each fiscal quarter in
the following order of priority: (i) first, 1.6% to the
Corporate General Partner, 0.4% to the Other General Partner,
and 98% to the limited partners until the limited partners have
received cumulative distributions for such fiscal year equal to
10% per annum of their daily weighted average Adjusted Capital
Value (as defined in the USRP partnership agreement) for such
fiscal quarter and each preceding quarter of such fiscal year;
(ii) second, to the Corporate General Partner until the
General Partners have received distributions for such fiscal
year equal to 7% of the aggregate Net Cash from Operations
distributed to the partners for such fiscal year;
(iii) third, to repay any loans made to USRP by the General
Partners; and (iv) fourth, 94% to the limited partners,
6.6% to the Corporate General Partner, and 0.4% to the Other
General Partner, and (b) Sales or Refinancing Proceeds (as
defined in the USRP partnership agreement) is distributed within
135 days of the sale or refinancing in the following order
of priority: (i) first, to the limited partners until each
limited partner has received an amount equal to his Adjusted
Capital Contribution (as defined in the USRP partnership
agreement) immediately prior to the distribution;
(ii) second, to each limited partner who has a Preferred
Return Shortfall (as defined in the USRP partnership agreement)
until all limited partners Preferred Return Shortfalls
have been eliminated; (iii) third, in the case of a sale
with respect to which the General Partners, or affiliates of the
General Partners, acted as a broker (subject to the limitations
set forth in the USRP partnership agreement), to the General
Partners, or affiliates of the General Partners, until they have
received an amount equal to 1% of the Selling Price (as defined
in the USRP partnership agreement) of each property sold on or
before the date of such distribution, reduced by the aggregate
of any prior distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds;
(iv) fourth, to the General Partners, or affiliates of the
General Partners, in repayment of principal and interest with
respect to loans that General Partners are required to make
under the USRP partnership agreement, to the extent that
principal or interest accrued on such loans remains unpaid, and
(v) fifth, the balance 93% to the limited partners and 7%
to the General Partners.
56
A description of the compensation paid to the Corporate General
Partner and its affiliates during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, can be found under the
heading Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions in this information statement/prospectus. In
addition, for more information, see
Note D Transactions with Affiliated
Parties in the notes to the financial statements appearing
in USRPs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, which is included as
Annex D to this information statement/prospectus,
and Note B Transactions with Affiliated
Parties in the notes to the financial statements appearing
in USRPs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which is included
as Annex E to this information statement/prospectus.
Aimco OP. The Aimco OP partnership agreement
provides that Aimco OPs general partner shall not be
compensated for its services as a general partner, other than
the compensation it receives with respect to distributions and
allocations in accordance with the partnership agreement.
Subject to certain provisions of the partnership agreement,
Aimco OP will reimburse the general partner for all sums
expended in connection with the partnerships business.
In addition, subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding
preferred OP Units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement
requires the general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute
quarterly all, or such portion of, as the general partner may in
its sole and absolute discretion determine, Available Cash (as
such term is defined in the partnership agreement) generated by
Aimco OP during such quarter to the general partner, the special
limited partner and the holders of common OP Units and HPUs
on the record date established by the general partner with
respect to such quarter, in accordance with their respective
interests in Aimco OP on such record date. The partnership
agreement requires the general partner to take such reasonable
efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion
and consistent with the REIT Requirements, to cause Aimco OP to
distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to
transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder
dividends that will (i) satisfy the requirements for
qualifying as a REIT under the Code and the Treasury Regulations
and (ii) avoid any United States Federal income or excise
tax liability of Aimco.
57
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX MATTERS
The following is a summary of the material United States Federal
income tax consequences of the merger, and an investment in
Aimco OP Units and Aimco stock. This discussion is based
upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Internal Revenue Code), regulations promulgated by
the U.S. Treasury Department (the Treasury
Regulations), rulings issued by the IRS, and judicial
decisions, all in effect as of the date of this information
statement/prospectus and all of which are subject to change or
differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect.
This summary is also based on the assumptions that the operation
of Aimco, Aimco OP and the limited liability companies and
limited partnerships in which they own controlling interests
(collectively, the Subsidiary Partnerships) and any
affiliated entities will be in accordance with their respective
organizational documents and partnership agreements. This
summary is for general information only and does not purport to
discuss all aspects of United States Federal income taxation
which may be important to a particular investor, or to certain
types of investors subject to special tax rules (including
financial institutions, broker-dealers, regulated investment
companies, holders that receive Aimco stock through the exercise
of stock options or otherwise as compensation, insurance
companies, persons holding Aimco stock as part of a
straddle, hedge, conversion
transaction, synthetic security or other
integrated investment, and, except to the extent discussed
below, tax-exempt organizations and foreign investors, as
determined for United States Federal income tax purposes). This
summary assumes that investors will hold their OP Units and
Aimco stock as capital assets (generally, property held for
investment). No opinion of counsel or advance ruling from the
IRS has been or will be sought regarding the tax status of Aimco
or Aimco OP, or the tax consequences relating to Aimco or Aimco
OP or an investment in OP Units or Aimco stock. No
assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a
court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax
aspects set forth below.
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF A PARTICULAR HOLDER DEPENDS
UPON DETERMINATIONS OF FACT AND INTERPRETATIONS OF COMPLEX
PROVISIONS OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAW FOR WHICH NO
CLEAR PRECEDENT OR AUTHORITY MAY BE AVAILABLE. ACCORDINGLY, EACH
HOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE
FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
MERGER, OF ACQUIRING, HOLDING, EXCHANGING, OR OTHERWISE
DISPOSING OF OP UNITS AND AIMCO STOCK, AND OF AIMCOS
ELECTION TO BE SUBJECT TO TAX, FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES,
AS A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST.
United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the
Merger
Tax
Consequences of the Transaction to USRP and Aimco
OP
When the assets or operations of two partnerships such as USRP
and Aimco OP are combined in a transaction pursuant to which one
of the partnerships ceases to exist as a partnership (the
terminated partnership) for Federal income tax
purposes, and the members of the terminated partnership become
members of the surviving partnership (the resulting
partnership), that combined transaction is generally
treated as a partnership merger.
In general, USRP would be treated as contributing all of its
assets, and assigning all of its liabilities, to Aimco OP in
exchange for interests in Aimco OP and any other consideration
issued by Aimco OP in connection with the transaction, including
cash or an assumption of liability, which may result in gain
recognition under the rules described below. Immediately
thereafter, USRP is treated as distributing all of its assets to
its partners in complete liquidation.
Tax
Consequences of the Transaction to Aimco and the Aimco
Entities
Aimco and the Aimco Entities (other than Aimco OP, which is
discussed separately, above) are not expected to recognize any
gain or loss on the transaction.
Tax
Consequences of Exchanging USRP Units Solely for
Cash
For Federal income tax purposes, any payment of cash for
USRP Units will be treated as a sale of such
USRP Units by such holder. Each such holder of
USRP Units who accepts cash must explicitly agree and
consent to
58
treat the payment of cash for USRP Units as a sale of such
units, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement.
If a holder of USRP Units sells such units for cash, such
holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale of his units
equal to the difference between (i) such holders
amount realized on the sale and (ii) such
holders adjusted tax basis in the USRP Units sold. The
amount realized with respect to a USRP Unit will be
equal to the sum of the amount of cash such holder receives for
his units plus the amount of liabilities of USRP allocable to
such USRP Units as determined under section 752 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Tax
Consequences of Exchanging USRP Units Solely for OP
Units
Generally, section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code
provides that neither a contributing partner nor the partnership
will recognize a gain or loss, for United States Federal income
tax purposes, upon a contribution of property to such
partnership in exchange for solely OP Units, except to the
extent described below. Each such holder of USRP Units who
accepts OP Units must explicitly agree and consent to such
treatment, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement.
If a holder of USRP Units contributes such units to Aimco OP in
exchange for solely OP Units, such holder may recognize
gain upon such exchange if, immediately prior to such exchange,
the amount of liabilities of USRP allocable to the USRP Units
transferred exceeds the amount of the Aimco OP partnership
liabilities allocable to such holder immediately after such
exchange. In that case the excess would be treated as a deemed
distribution of cash to such holder from Aimco OP. This deemed
cash distribution would be treated as a nontaxable return of
capital to the extent such holders adjusted tax basis in
his OP Units and thereafter as taxable gain.
Tax
Consequences of Receipt of Cash Payment for Waiver and
Release
As discussed in The Merger Waiver and
Additional Consideration, each limited partner
unaffiliated with Aimco OP may elect to receive an additional
cash payment in exchange for executing a waiver and release of
certain claims. The United Stated Federal income tax treatment
of such additional cash payment is uncertain. Aimco OP intends
to treat the additional cash payment as a payment made for the
waiver and release of certain claims, and not as additional
Merger Consideration, and intends to report the additional cash
payment accordingly. No assurance can be given that the IRS
would not assert that the additional cash payment should be
treated as part of the Merger Consideration. Holders that elect
to receive the additional cash payment in exchange for executing
a waiver and release should consult their tax advisors
concerning the tax treatment of such payment.
Information
Reporting Requirements And Backup Withholding
United
States Holders
In general, backup withholding and information reporting will
apply to all payments made to a United States Holder pursuant to
the Merger. A United States Holder will generally be subject to
backup withholding (at a rate of 28% through 2010 and a rate of
31% thereafter, absent further Congressional action) with
respect to payments made pursuant to the Merger unless such
holder, among other conditions, provides a correct taxpayer
identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from
backup withholding, and otherwise complies with the applicable
requirements of the backup withholding rules, or otherwise
establishes a basis for exemption from backup withholding.
Exempt United States Holders (including, among others, all
corporations) are not subject to these backup withholding and
information reporting requirements. A holder who does not
provide Aimco OP with his correct taxpayer identification number
also may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any amount
paid as backup withholding will be creditable against the
holders income tax liability.
Non-United
States Holders
Information reporting may apply to payments made to a
Non-United
States Holder pursuant to the Merger. Copies of information
returns reporting such amounts and any withholding also may be
made available by the IRS to the tax authorities in the country
in which a
Non-United
States Holder is resident under the provision of an applicable
income tax treaty or other agreement.
Non-United
States Holders that receive OP Units as Merger
59
Consideration should see Taxation of Aimco OP
and OP Unitholders Taxation of Foreign
OP Unitholders, below.
In general, backup withholding will not apply to payments made a
Non-United
States Holder pursuant to the Merger, if, among other
conditions, such
Non-United
States Holder certifies as to its
non-United
States status under penalties of perjury or otherwise
establishes an exemption, provided that neither Aimco OP nor our
withholding agent has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that
the
Non-United
States Holder is a United States person or that the conditions
of any other exemption are not in fact satisfied. In order to
claim an exemption from or reduction of withholding tax, the
Non-United
States Holder must deliver a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI,
as applicable, claiming such exemption or reduction. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be
allowed as a refund or credit against such
Non-United
States Holders United States Federal income tax liability
if the
Non-United
States Holder follows the required procedures.
Because the tax treatment of the receipt of an additional cash
payment in exchange for executing a waiver and release of
certain claims is unclear under United States Federal income tax
law, Aimco OP intends to withhold United States Federal income
tax at a rate of 30% from any additional cash payment paid to a
Non-U.S. Holder,
unless an exemption from or reduction of withholding tax is
applicable. In order to claim an exemption from or reduction of
withholding tax, the
Non-United
States Holder must deliver a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI,
as applicable, claiming such exemption or reduction.
Non-U.S. Holders
are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the
possibility of claiming a refund with respect to the receipt of
an additional cash payment in exchange for executing a waiver
and release.
Taxation
of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders
Partnership
Status
Aimco believes that Aimco OP is classified as a partnership, and
not as an association taxable as a corporation or as a publicly
traded partnership taxable as a corporation for United States
Federal income tax purposes. If Aimco OP were treated as a
publicly traded partnership taxed as a corporation
for United States Federal income tax purposes, material adverse
consequences to the Transferor and its owners would result. In
addition, classification of Aimco OP as an association or
publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation would also
result in the termination of Aimcos status as a REIT for
United States Federal income tax purposes, which would have a
material adverse impact on Aimco. See Material
United States Federal Income Tax Matters Taxation of
Aimco and Aimco Stockholders Tax Aspects of
Aimcos Investments in Partnerships. The following
discussion assumes that Aimco OP is, and will continue to be,
classified and taxed as a partnership (and not as a publicly
traded partnership) for United States Federal income tax
purposes.
Taxation
Of OP Unitholders
In general, a partnership is treated as a
pass-through entity for United States Federal income
tax purposes and is not itself subject to United States Federal
income taxation. Each partner of a partnership, however, is
subject to tax on his allocable share of partnership tax items,
including partnership income, gains, losses, deductions, and
expenses (Partnership Tax Items) for each taxable
year of the partnership ending within or with such taxable year
of the partner, regardless of whether he receives any actual
distributions from the partnership during the taxable year.
Generally, the characterization of any particular Partnership
Tax Item is determined at the partnership, rather than at the
partner level, and the amount of a partners allocable
share of such item is governed by the terms of the partnership
agreement. An OP Unitholders allocable share of Aimco
OPs taxable income may exceed the cash distributions to
the OP Unitholder for any year if Aimco OP retains its
profits rather than distributing them.
Allocations
Of Aimco OP Profits And Losses
For United States Federal income tax purposes, an
OP Unitholders allocable share of Aimco OPs
Partnership Tax Items will be determined by Aimco OPs
partnership agreement if such allocations either have
substantial economic effect or are determined to be
in accordance with the OP Unitholders interests in
Aimco OP. If the allocations provided by Aimco OPs
agreement of limited partnership were successfully challenged by
the IRS, the
60
redetermination of the allocations to a particular
OP Unitholder for United States Federal income tax purposes
may be less favorable than the allocation set forth in Aimco
OPs agreement of limited partnership.
Tax
Basis Of A Partnership Interest
A partners adjusted tax basis in his partnership interest
is relevant, among other things, for determining (i) gain
or loss upon a taxable disposition of his partnership interest,
(ii) gain upon the receipt of partnership distributions,
and (iii) the limitations imposed on the use of partnership
deductions and losses allocable to such partner. Generally, the
adjusted tax basis of an OP Unitholders interest in
Aimco OP is equal to (A) the sum of the adjusted tax basis
of the property contributed by the OP Unitholder to Aimco
OP in exchange for an interest in Aimco OP and the amount of
cash, if any, contributed by the OP Unitholder to Aimco OP,
(B) reduced, but not below zero, by the
OP Unitholders allocable share of Aimco OP
partnership distributions, deductions, and losses,
(C) increased by the OP Unitholders allocable
share of Aimco OP partnership income and gains, and
(D) increased by the OP Unitholders allocable
share of Aimco OP partnership liabilities and decreased by the
OP Unitholders liabilities assumed by Aimco OP.
Cash
Distributions
Cash distributions received from a partnership do not
necessarily correlate with income earned by the partnership as
determined for United States Federal income tax purposes. Thus,
an OP Unitholders United States Federal income tax
liability in respect of his allocable share of Aimco OP taxable
income for a particular taxable year may exceed the amount of
cash, if any, received by the OP Unitholder from Aimco OP
during such year.
If cash distributions, including a deemed cash
distribution as discussed below, received by an
OP Unitholder in any taxable year exceed his allocable
share of Aimco OP taxable income for the year, the excess will
generally constitute, for United States Federal income tax
purposes, a return of capital to the extent of such
OP Unitholders adjusted tax basis in his Aimco OP
interest. Such return of capital will not be includible in the
taxable income of the OP Unitholder, for United States
Federal income tax purposes, but it will reduce, but not below
zero, the adjusted tax basis of Aimco OP interests held by the
OP Unitholder. If an OP Unitholders tax basis in
his Aimco OP interest is reduced to zero, a subsequent cash
distribution received by the OP Unitholder will be subject
to tax as capital gain
and/or
ordinary income, but only if, and to the extent that, such
distribution exceeds the subsequent positive adjustments, if
any, to the tax basis of the OP Unitholders Aimco OP
interest as determined at the end of the taxable year during
which such distribution is received. A decrease in an
OP Unitholders share of Aimco OP liabilities
resulting from the payment or other settlement, or reallocation
of such liabilities is generally treated, for United States
Federal income tax purposes, as a deemed cash distribution. The
Transaction documents permit Aimco to make such debt payments. A
decrease in an OP Unitholders percentage interest in
Aimco OP because of the issuance by Aimco OP of additional
OP Units or otherwise, may decrease an
OP Unitholders share of nonrecourse liabilities of
Aimco OP and thus, may result in a corresponding deemed
distribution of cash. A deemed distribution of cash resulting
from the payment, settlement, or other reduction or reallocation
of Aimco OP liabilities formerly allocated to an
OP Unitholder will result in taxable gain to such
OP Unitholder to the extent such deemed distribution of
cash exceeds the OP Unitholders basis in his
OP Units
A non-pro rata distribution (or deemed distribution) of money or
property may result in ordinary income to an OP Unitholder,
regardless of such OP Unitholders tax basis in his
OP Units, if the distribution reduces such
OP Unitholders share of Aimco OPs
Section 751 Assets. Section 751
Assets are defined by the Internal Revenue Code to include
unrealized receivables or inventory
items. Among other things, unrealized
receivables include amounts attributable to previously
claimed depreciation deductions on certain types of property. To
the extent that such a reduction in an OP Unitholders
share of Section 751 Assets occurs, Aimco OP will be deemed
to have distributed a proportionate share of the
Section 751 Assets to the OP Unitholder followed by a
deemed exchange of such assets with Aimco OP in return for the
non-pro rata portion of the actual distribution made to such
OP Unitholder. This deemed exchange will generally result
in the realization of ordinary income by the OP Unitholder.
Such income will equal the excess of (1) the non-pro rata
portion of such distribution over (2) the
OP Unitholders tax basis in such
OP Unitholders share of such Section 751 Assets
deemed relinquished in the exchange.
61
Tax
Consequences Relating To Contributed Assets and Transferred
Liabilities
Generally, section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code
provides that neither the contributing partner nor Aimco OP will
recognize a gain or loss, for United States Federal income tax
purposes, upon a contribution of property to Aimco OP solely in
exchange for OP Units. If, however, in connection with such
a contribution of property, the investor receives, or is deemed
to receive, cash or other consideration in addition to
OP Units, the receipt or deemed receipt of such cash or
other consideration may be treated as part of a disguised
sale. In that case, the investor would be treated as
having sold, in a taxable transaction, a portion of the
contributed property to Aimco OP in exchange for such cash or
other consideration; the balance of the contributed property
would, however, remain subject to the tax-free contribution
treatment described above. Subject to certain exceptions,
including exceptions that apply to distributions of operating
cash flow, any transfer or deemed transfer (such as a debt pay
down which is permitted under the transaction documents), of
cash by Aimco OP to the contributing partner within two years
before or after such contribution, including cash paid at
closing, will be treated as part of a taxable disguised
sale. In addition, the IRS may assert that any redemption
or exchange transaction involving the OP Units issued in
connection with the Transaction that occurs within several years
after such transaction constitutes an integrated disguised
sale that may result in taxation (without the receipt of
cash) for OP Unitholders who do not dispose of their
OP Units.
The disguised sale rules may also apply, and give
rise to taxable income without a corresponding receipt of cash
where, for example, the holder of USRP Units contributes
property to Aimco OP subject to one or more liabilities, where
liabilities are assumed or paid by Aimco OP or where a
redemption or exchange involving the OP Units issued in
connection with the Transaction occurs within several years
after the Transaction. The application of the disguised
sale rules is complex and depends, in part, upon the facts
and circumstances applicable to the holders of USRP Units, which
Aimco has not undertaken to review. Accordingly, investors are
particularly urged with their tax advisors concerning the extent
to which the disguised sale rules would apply.
If an investor transfers property to Aimco OP in exchange for an
OP Unit, and the adjusted tax basis of such property
differs from its fair market value, Partnership Tax Items must
be allocated in a manner such that the contributing partner is
charged with, or benefits from, the unrealized gain or
unrealized loss associated with such property at the time of the
contribution. This may result in a tax liability without a
corresponding receipt of cash. Where a partner contributes cash
to a partnership that holds appreciated property, Treasury
Regulations provide for a similar allocation of such items to
the other partners. These rules may apply to a contribution by
Aimco to Aimco OP of cash proceeds received by Aimco from the
offering of its stock. Such allocations are solely for United
States Federal income tax purposes and do not affect the book
capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among
the OP Unitholders. The general purpose underlying this
provision is to specially allocate certain Partnership Tax Items
in order to place both the noncontributing and contributing
partners in the same tax position that they would have been in
had the contributing partner contributed property with an
adjusted tax basis equal to its fair market value. Treasury
Regulations provide Aimco OP with several alternative methods
and allow Aimco OP to adopt any other reasonable method to make
allocations to reduce or eliminate these book-tax
differences. The general partner, in its sole and absolute
discretion and in a manner consistent with Treasury Regulations,
will select and adopt a method of allocating Partnership Tax
Items for purposes of eliminating such disparities. The method
selected by Aimco OP in its sole discretion could cause the
transferor (or its partners) to incur a tax liability without a
corresponding receipt of cash. Each prospective investor is
urged to consult his tax advisor regarding the tax consequences
of any special allocations of Partnership Tax Items resulting
from the contribution of property to Aimco OP.
Disguised
Sales Rules
As described above, if a contributing partner receives or is
deemed to receive for United States Federal income tax purposes,
cash or other consideration in addition to OP Units upon
the contribution of property to Aimco OP or within two years
before or after such consideration (other than certain safe
harbor distributions), the transaction will likely be treated as
part contribution of property and part sale of property under
the disguised sale rules. The disguised
sale rules may also apply where property is transferred to
Aimco OP subject to certain liabilities. In such event, the
contributing partner will recognize gain or loss with respect to
the portion of the property that is deemed to be sold to Aimco
OP. If the disguised sale rules apply, all or a
portion of the liabilities associated with
62
the contributed property may be treated as consideration
received by the contributing partner in a sale of the property
to Aimco OP. The disguised sale rules may apply if,
for example, the issuance of OP Units to USRP limited
partners in connection with the merger is integrated with any
other acquisition between Aimco and any OP Unitholder or
any related party. For example, the IRS may assert that any
redemption or exchange for several years between Aimco OP and
any OP Unitholder who receives OP Units in the current
transaction constitutes an integrated disguised sale
that may result in taxation (without receipt of cash) for
OP Unitholders who do not dispose of their OP Units.
No assurances can be given that the IRS would not be successful
in such an assertion. Each prospective investor is urged to
consult his tax advisor regarding the application of the
disguised sale rules.
Limitations
On Deductibility Of Losses
Basis Limitation. To the extent that an
OP Unitholders allocable share of Aimco OP
partnership deductions and losses exceeds his adjusted tax basis
in his Aimco OP interest at the end of the taxable year in which
the losses and deductions flow through, the excess losses and
deductions cannot be utilized, for United States Federal income
tax purposes, by the OP Unitholder in such year. The excess
losses and deductions may, however, be utilized in the first
succeeding taxable year in which, and to the extent that, there
is an increase in the tax basis of Aimco OP interest held by
such OP Unitholder, but only to the extent permitted under
the at risk and passive activity loss
rules discussed below.
At Risk Limitation. Under the
at risk rules of section 465 of the Internal
Revenue Code, a noncorporate taxpayer and a closely held
corporate taxpayer are generally not permitted to claim a
deduction, for United States Federal income tax purposes, in
respect of a loss from an activity, whether conducted directly
by the taxpayer or through an investment in a partnership, to
the extent that the loss exceeds the aggregate dollar amount
which the taxpayer has at risk in such activity at
the close of the taxable year. To the extent that losses are not
permitted to be used in any taxable year, such losses may be
carried over to subsequent taxable years and may be claimed as a
deduction by the taxpayer if, and to the extent that, the amount
which the taxpayer has at risk is increased.
Provided certain requirements are met, a taxpayer is considered
at risk for the taxpayers share of any
nonrecourse financing which is secured by real property used in
any activity that constitutes the holding of real
property, which activity should be the case for a limited
partner of a common OP Unit generally should constitute.
Passive Activity Loss
Limitation. The passive activity loss rules of
section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code limit the use of
losses derived from passive activities, which generally includes
an investment in limited partnership interests such as the
OP Units. If an investment in an OP Unit is treated as
a passive activity, an OP Unitholder who is an individual
investor, as well as certain other types of investors, would not
be able to use losses from Aimco OP to offset nonpassive
activity income, including salary, business income, and
portfolio income (e.g., dividends, interest, royalties, and gain
on the disposition of portfolio investments) received during the
taxable year. Passive activity losses that are disallowed for a
particular taxable year may, however, be carried forward to
offset passive activity income earned by the OP Unitholder
in future taxable years. In addition, such disallowed losses may
be claimed as a deduction, subject to the basis and at risk
limitations discussed above, upon a taxable disposition of an
OP Unitholders entire interest in Aimco OP,
regardless of whether such OP Unitholder has received any
passive activity income during the year of disposition.
If Aimco OP were characterized as a publicly traded partnership,
each OP Unitholder would be required to treat any loss
derived from Aimco OP separately from any income or loss derived
from any other publicly traded partnership, as well as from
income or loss derived from other passive activities. In such
case, any net losses or credits attributable to Aimco OP which
are carried forward may only be offset against future income of
Aimco OP. Moreover, unlike other passive activity losses,
suspended losses attributable to Aimco OP would only be allowed
upon the complete disposition of the OP Unitholders
entire interest in Aimco OP.
Section 754
Election
Aimco OP has made the election permitted by section 754 of
the Internal Revenue Code. Such election is irrevocable without
the consent of the IRS. The election will generally permit a
purchaser of OP Units, such as Aimco when it acquires Aimco
OP Units from OP Unitholders, to adjust its share of
the basis in Aimco OPs properties pursuant to
section 743(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to fair market
value (as reflected by the value of
63
consideration paid for the OP Units), as if such purchaser
had acquired a direct interest in Aimco OP assets. The
section 743(b) adjustment is attributed solely to a
purchaser of OP Units and is not added to the bases of
Aimco OPs assets associated with all of the
OP Unitholders in Aimco OP.
Depreciation
Section 168(i)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code provides
that in the case of property transferred to a partnership in a
section 721 transaction, the transferee shall be treated as
the transferor for purposes of computing the depreciation
deduction with respect to so much of the basis in the hands of
the transferee as does not exceed the adjusted basis in the
hands of the transferor. The effect of this rule would be to
continue the historic basis, placed in service dates and methods
with respect to the depreciation of the properties being
contributed by a Contributing Partner to Aimco OP in exchange
for OP Units. However, an acquirer of OP Units that
obtains a section 743(b) adjustment by reason of such
acquisition (see Section 754 Election, above)
generally will be allowed depreciation with respect to such
adjustment beginning as of the date of the exchange as if it
were new property placed in service as of that date.
Sale,
Redemption, Exchange or Abandonment of OP Units
An OP Unitholder will recognize a gain or loss upon a sale
of an OP Unit, a redemption of an OP Unit for cash, an
exchange of an OP Unit for shares of common stock or other
taxable disposition of an OP Unit. Gain or loss recognized
upon a sale or exchange of an OP Unit will be equal to the
difference between (i) the amount realized in the
transaction (i.e., the sum of the cash and the fair market value
of any property received for the OP Unit plus the amount of
Aimco OP liabilities allocable to the OP Unit at such time)
and (ii) the OP Unitholders tax basis in the
OP Unit disposed of, which tax basis will be adjusted for
the OP Unitholders allocable share of Aimco OPs
income or loss for the taxable year of the disposition. The tax
liability resulting from the gain recognized on a disposition of
an OP Unit could exceed the amount of cash and the fair
market value of property received.
If Aimco OP redeems an OP Unitholders OP Units
for cash (which is not contributed by Aimco to effect the
redemption), the tax consequences generally would be the same as
described in the preceding paragraphs, except that if Aimco OP
redeems less than all of an OP Unitholders
OP Units, the OP Unitholder would recognize taxable
gain only to the extent that the cash, plus the amount of Aimco
OP liabilities allocable to the redeemed OP Units, exceeded
the OP Unitholders adjusted tax basis in all of such
OP Unitholders OP Units immediately before the
redemption.
Capital gains recognized by individuals and certain other
noncorporate taxpayers upon the sale or disposition of an
OP Unit will be subject to taxation at long term capital
gains rates if the OP Unit is held for more than
12 months and will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates if
the OP Unit is held for 12 months or less. Generally,
gain or loss recognized by an OP Unitholder on the sale or
other taxable disposition of an OP Unit will be taxable as
capital gain or loss. However, to the extent that the amount
realized upon the sale or other taxable disposition of an
OP Unit attributable to an OP Unitholders share
of unrealized receivables of Aimco OP exceeds the
basis attributable to those assets, such excess will be treated
as ordinary income. Among other things, unrealized
receivables include amounts attributable to previously
claimed depreciation deductions on certain types of property. In
addition, the maximum United States Federal income tax rate for
net capital gains attributable to the sale of depreciable real
property (which may be determined to include an interest in a
partnership such as Aimco OP) held for more than 12 months
is currently 25% (rather than 15%) to the extent of previously
claimed depreciation deductions that would not be treated as
unrealized receivables. See also Disguised
Sales Rules above for sales integrated with the
contribution of property for OP Units.
The law is currently uncertain regarding the treatment of an
abandoned interest in a partnership, and whether an abandonment
gives rise to a deductible loss is a question of fact. Even if
an investor were able to successfully abandon his interest in an
OP Unit and thereby recognized loss to the extent of his
basis in such OP Unit, under authority recently issued by
the IRS, it is likely that such loss would be capital, rather
than ordinary, in nature. Prospective investors are urged to
consult their tax advisors regarding the application, effect and
method of abandoning an interest in an OP Unit.
64
Alternative
Minimum Tax
The Internal Revenue Code contains different sets of minimum tax
rules applicable to corporate and noncorporate investors. The
discussion below relates only to the alternative minimum tax
applicable to noncorporate taxpayers. Accordingly, corporate
investors should consult with their tax advisors with respect to
the effect of the corporate minimum tax provisions that may be
applicable to them. Noncorporate taxpayers are subject to an
alternative minimum tax to the extent the tentative minimum tax
(TMT) exceeds the regular income tax otherwise
payable. In general, alternative minimum taxable income
(AMTI) consists of the taxpayers taxable
income, determined with certain adjustments, plus his items of
tax preference. For example, alternative minimum taxable income
is calculated using an alternative cost recovery (depreciation)
system that is not as favorable as the methods provided for
under section 168 of the Internal Revenue Code which Aimco
OP will use in computing its income for regular United States
Federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, an
OP Unitholders AMTI derived from Aimco OP may be
higher than such OP Unitholders share of Aimco
OPs net taxable income. Prospective investors should
consult their tax advisors as to the impact of an investment in
OP Units on their liability for the alternative minimum tax.
Information
Returns and Audit Procedures
Aimco OP will use all reasonable efforts to furnish to each
OP Unitholder as soon as possible after the close of each
taxable year of Aimco OP, certain tax information, including a
Schedule K-l,
which sets forth each OP Unitholders allocable share
of Aimco OPs Partnership Tax Items. In preparing this
information the general partner will use various accounting and
reporting conventions to determine the respective
OP Unitholders allocable share of Partnership Tax
Items. The general partner cannot assure a current or
prospective OP Unitholder that the IRS will not
successfully contend in court that such accounting and reporting
conventions are impermissible.
No assurance can be given that Aimco OP will not be audited by
the IRS or that tax adjustments will not be made. Further, any
adjustments in Aimco OPs tax returns will lead to
adjustments in OP Unitholders tax returns and may
lead to audits of their returns and adjustments of items
unrelated to Aimco OP. Each OP Unitholder would bear the
cost of any expenses incurred in connection with an examination
of such OP Unitholders personal tax return.
The tax treatment of Partnership Tax Items generally is
determined at the partnership level in a unified partnership
proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the
partners. The Internal Revenue Code provides for one partner to
be designated as the Tax Matters Partner for these purposes.
The Tax Matters Partner is authorized, but not required, to take
certain actions on behalf of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders
and can extend the statute of limitations for assessment of tax
deficiencies against OP Unitholders with respect to Aimco
OP Tax Items. The Tax Matters Partner may bind an
OP Unitholder with less than a l% profits interest in Aimco
OP to a settlement with the IRS, unless such OP Unitholder
elects, by filing a statement with the IRS, not to give such
authority to the Tax Matters Partner. The Tax Matters Partner
may seek judicial review (to which all the OP Unitholders
are bound) of a final partnership administrative adjustment and,
if the Tax Matters Partner fails to seek judicial review, such
review may be sought by any OP Unitholder having at least a
1% interest in the profits of Aimco OP or by OP Unitholders
having in the aggregate at least a 5% profits interest. However,
only one action for judicial review will go forward, and each
OP Unitholder with an interest in the outcome may
participate.
Tax
Return Disclosure and Investor List Requirements
Treasury Regulations require participants in a reportable
transaction to disclose certain information about the
transaction to the IRS with their tax returns and retain certain
information relating to the transaction (the Disclosure
Requirement). In addition, organizers, sellers, and
certain advisors of a reportable transaction are required to
maintain certain records, including lists identifying the
investors in a transaction, and to furnish those records, as
well as detailed information regarding the transaction, to the
IRS upon demand (the List Maintenance Requirement).
While the Disclosure Requirement and the List Maintenance
Requirement are directed towards tax shelters, the
regulations are written quite broadly, and apply to transactions
that would not typically be considered tax shelters. There are
significant penalties for failure to comply with these
requirements.
65
A transaction may be a reportable transaction based upon any of
several indicia, including, among other things, losses.
Characterization of this transaction as a reportable transaction
could increase the likelihood of an audit by the IRS. You would
be required to attach a completed IRS Form 8886, the
Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement, to your
tax return for the taxable year of the transaction, as well as
provide a copy of this form to the Office of Tax Shelter
Analysis at the same time that such statement is first filed
with the IRS. You should consult your tax advisors concerning
these disclosure obligations with respect to the receipt or
disposition of Common OP Units, or transactions that might
be undertaken directly or indirectly by Aimco OP. Moreover, you
should be aware that Aimco OP and other participants in the
transactions involving Aimco OP (including their advisors) would
be subject to the Disclosure Requirement
and/or the
List Maintenance Requirement if this transaction were to be
classified as a reportable transaction.
Taxation
Of Foreign OP Unitholders
A
Non-U.S. Holder
(as defined below under Material United States
Federal Income Tax Matters Taxation of Aimco
and Aimco Stockholders Taxation of Foreign
Stockholders) will generally be considered to be engaged in a
United States trade or business on account of its ownership of
an OP Unit. As a result, a
Non-U.S. Holder
will be required to file United States Federal income tax
returns with respect to its allocable share of Aimco OPs
income which is effectively connected to its trade or business.
A
Non-U.S. Holder
that is a corporation may also be subject to United States
branch profit tax at a rate of 30%, in addition to regular
United States Federal income tax, on its allocable share of such
income. Such a tax may be reduced or eliminated by an income tax
treaty between the United States and the country with respect to
which the
Non-U.S. Holder
is resident for tax purposes.
Non-U.S. Holders
are advised to consult their tax advisors regarding the effects
an investment in Aimco OP may have on information return
requirements and other United States and
non-United
States tax matters, including the tax consequences of an
investment in Aimco OP for the country or other jurisdiction of
which such
Non-U.S. Holder
is a citizen or in which such
Non-U.S. Holder
resides or is otherwise located.
Taxation
of Aimco and Aimco Stockholders
Taxation
of Aimco
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code are highly
technical and complex. The following summary sets forth certain
aspects of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that
govern the United States Federal income tax treatment of a REIT
and its stockholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety
by the applicable Internal Revenue Code provisions, Treasury
Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations
thereof, all of which are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect.
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ended
December 31, 1994, and Aimco intends to continue such
election. Although Aimco believes that, commencing with the
Aimcos initial taxable year ended December 31, 1994,
Aimco was organized in conformity with the requirements for
qualification as a REIT, and its actual method of operation has
enabled, and its proposed method of operation will enable, it to
meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code, no assurance can be given that
Aimco has been or will remain so qualified. Such qualification
and taxation as a REIT depends upon Aimcos ability to
meet, on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating
results, asset ownership, distribution levels, requirements
regard diversity of stock ownership, and the various
qualification tests imposed under the Internal Revenue Code as
discussed below. No assurance can be given that the actual
results of Aimcos operation for any one taxable year will
satisfy such requirements. See Material United States
Federal Income Tax Matters Taxation of Aimco and
Aimco Stockholders Failure to Qualify. No
assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge
Aimcos eligibility for taxation as a REIT.
Taxation
of REITs in General
Provided Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it will generally be
entitled to a deduction for dividends that it pays and therefore
will not be subject to United States Federal corporate income
tax on its net income that is currently distributed to its
stockholders. This deduction for dividends paid substantially
eliminates the double taxation of corporate income
(i.e., taxation at both the corporate and stockholder levels)
that generally results from investment
66
in a corporation. Rather, income generated by a REIT is
generally taxed only at the stockholder level upon a
distribution of dividends by the REIT.
The rates at which individual stockholders are taxed on
corporate dividends are set to increase to 39.6% after
December 31, 2010, absent further Congressional action.
With limited exceptions, however, dividends received by
stockholders from Aimco or from other entities that are taxed as
REITs are generally not eligible for the reduced rates formerly
applicable to qualified dividend income, and will continue to be
taxed at rates applicable to ordinary income. See
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Stockholders
Taxation of Taxable Domestic
Stockholders Distributions.
Net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax
attributes of a REIT generally do not pass through to the
stockholders of the REIT, subject to special rules for certain
items such as capital gains recognized by REITs. See
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Stockholders.
If Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it will nonetheless be subject to
Federal income tax in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Aimco will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any
undistributed REIT taxable income, including undistributed net
capital gains.
|
|
|
|
A 100% excise tax may be imposed on some items of income and
expense that are directly or constructively paid between Aimco
and its taxable REIT subsidiaries (as described below) if and to
the extent that the IRS successfully asserts that the economic
arrangements between Aimco and its taxable REIT subsidiaries are
not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties.
|
|
|
|
If Aimco has net income from prohibited transactions, which are,
in general, sales or other dispositions of property held
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be
subject to a 100% tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we elect to treat property that we acquire in connection with
a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or certain leasehold
terminations as foreclosure property, we may thereby
avoid the 100% prohibited transactions tax on gain from a resale
of that property (if the sale would otherwise constitute a
prohibited transaction), but the income from the sale or
operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax
at the highest applicable rate. We do not anticipate receiving
any income from foreclosure property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Aimco should fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the
95% gross income test (as discussed below), but has nonetheless
maintained its qualification as a REIT because certain other
requirements have been met, it will be subject to a 100% tax on
an amount based on the magnitude of the failure adjusted to
reflect the profit margin associated with Aimcos gross
income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, if Aimco should fail to satisfy the asset or other
requirements applicable to REITs, as described below, yet
nonetheless maintain its qualification as a REIT because there
is reasonable cause for the failure and other applicable
requirements are met, it may be subject to an excise tax. In
that case, the amount of the tax will be at least $50,000 per
failure, and, in the case of certain asset test failures, will
be determined as the amount of net income generated by the
assets in question multiplied by the highest corporate tax rate
if that amount exceeds $50,000 per failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Aimco should fail to distribute during each calendar year at
least the sum of (i) 85% of its REIT ordinary income for
such year, (ii) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for
such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from
prior periods, Aimco would be required to pay a 4% excise tax on
the excess of the required distribution over the sum of
(a) the amounts actually distributed, plus
(b) retained amounts on which income tax is paid at the
corporate level.
|
|
|
|
Aimco may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in
certain circumstances, including if it fails to meet the record
keeping requirements intended to monitor its compliance with
rules relating to the composition of a REITs stockholders,
as described below in Taxation of Aimco and
Aimco Stockholders Requirements for
Qualification General.
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
If Aimco acquires appreciated assets from a corporation that is
not a REIT (i.e., a subchapter C corporation) in a
transaction in which the adjusted tax basis of the assets in the
hands of Aimco is determined by reference to the adjusted tax
basis of the assets in the hands of the subchapter C
corporation, Aimco may be subject to tax on such appreciation at
the highest corporate income tax rate then applicable if Aimco
subsequently recognizes gain on the disposition of any such
asset during the ten-year period following its acquisition from
the subchapter C corporation.
|
|
|
|
Certain earnings of Aimcos subsidiaries are subchapter C
corporations, the earnings of which could be subject to Federal
corporate income tax.
|
|
|
|
Aimco may be subject to the alternative minimum tax
on its items of tax preference, including any deductions of net
operating losses.
|
|
|
|
Aimco and its subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes,
including state, local and foreign income taxes, property taxes
and other taxes on their assets and operations. Aimco could also
be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not
presently contemplated.
|
Requirements
for Qualification
The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust
or association:
1. that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;
2. the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by
transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of
beneficial interest;
3. that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for
the special Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to REITs;
4. that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance
company subject to certain provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code;
5. the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more
persons;
6. in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not
more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is owned,
directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined
in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain
entities); and
7. that meets other tests described below (including with
respect to the nature of its income and assets).
The Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions
(1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable
year, and that the condition (5) must be met during at
least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or
during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year.
Aimco believes that it has been organized, has operated and has
issued sufficient shares of stock to satisfy conditions
(1) through (7) inclusive. Aimcos articles of
incorporation provide certain restrictions regarding transfers
of its shares, which are intended to assist Aimco in satisfying
the share ownership requirements described in conditions
(5) and (6) above. These restrictions, however, may
not ensure that Aimco will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the
share ownership requirements described in (5) and
(6) above.
To monitor Aimcos compliance with the share ownership
requirements, Aimco is generally required to maintain records
regarding the actual ownership of its shares. To do so, Aimco
must demand written statements each year from the record holders
of certain percentages of its stock in which the record holders
are to disclose the actual owners of the shares (i.e., the
persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid
by Aimco). A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply
with this demand must be maintained as part of Aimcos
records. Failure by Aimco to comply with these record keeping
requirements could subject it to monetary penalties. A
stockholder who fails or refuses to comply with the demand is
required by the Treasury Regulations to submit a statement with
its tax return disclosing the actual ownership of the shares and
certain other information.
68
In addition, a corporation generally may not elect to become a
REIT unless its taxable year is the calendar year. Aimco
satisfies this requirement.
The Internal Revenue Code provides relief from violations of the
REIT gross income requirements, as described below under
Income Tests, in cases where a violation
is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, and other
requirements are met, including the payment of a penalty tax
that is based upon the magnitude of the violation. In addition,
the Internal Revenue Code extends similar relief in the case of
certain violations of the REIT asset requirements (see
Asset Tests below) and other REIT
requirements, again provided that the violation is due to
reasonable cause and not willful neglect, and other conditions
are met, including the payment of a penalty tax. If Aimco fails
to satisfy any of the various REIT requirements, there can be no
assurance that these relief provisions would be available to
enable it to maintain its qualification as a REIT, and, if
available, the amount of any resultant penalty tax could be
substantial.
Effect of
Subsidiary Entities
Ownership of Partnership Interests. In the
case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, the Treasury
Regulations provide that the REIT is deemed to own its
proportionate share of the partnerships assets and to earn
its proportionate share of the partnerships income for
purposes of the asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs
as described below. Similarly, the assets and gross income of
the partnership are deemed to retain the same character in the
hands of the REIT. Thus, Aimcos proportionate share of the
assets, liabilities and items of income of the Subsidiary
Partnerships will be treated as assets, liabilities and items of
income of Aimco for purposes of applying the REIT requirements
described below. A summary of certain rules governing the
Federal income taxation of partnerships and their partners is
provided below in Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Tax Aspects of Investments in
Affiliated Entities Partnerships.
Disregarded Subsidiaries. Aimcos
indirect interests in Aimco OP and other Subsidiary Partnerships
are held through wholly owned corporate subsidiaries of Aimco
organized and operated as qualified REIT
subsidiaries within the meaning of the Internal Revenue
Code. A qualified REIT subsidiary is any corporation, other than
a taxable REIT subsidiary as described below, that
is wholly owned by a REIT, or by other disregarded subsidiaries,
or by a combination of the two. If a REIT owns a qualified REIT
subsidiary, that subsidiary is disregarded for Federal income
tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities and items of income,
deduction and credit of the subsidiary are treated as assets,
liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the
REIT itself, including for purposes of the gross income and
asset tests applicable to REITs as summarized below. Each
qualified REIT subsidiary, therefore, is not subject to Federal
corporate income taxation, although it may be subject to state
or local taxation. Other entities that are wholly owned by a
REIT, including single member limited liability companies, are
also generally disregarded as separate entities for Federal
income tax purposes, including for purposes of the REIT income
and asset tests. Disregarded subsidiaries, along with
partnerships in which Aimco holds an equity interest, are
sometimes referred to herein as pass-through
subsidiaries.
In the event that a disregarded subsidiary of Aimco ceases to be
wholly owned for example, if any equity interest in
the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than Aimco or
another disregarded subsidiary of Aimco the
subsidiarys separate existence would no longer be
disregarded for Federal income tax purposes. Instead, it would
have multiple owners and would be treated as either a
partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could,
depending on the circumstances, adversely affect Aimcos
ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income
requirements applicable to REITs, including the requirement that
REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than
10% of the securities of another corporation. See
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Asset Tests and
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Income Tests.
Taxable Subsidiaries. A REIT, in general, may
jointly elect with subsidiary corporations, whether or not
wholly owned, to treat the subsidiary corporation as a taxable
REIT subsidiary (TRS). A TRS also includes any
corporation, other than a REIT, with respect to which a TRS in
which a REIT owns an interest, owns securities possessing 35% of
the total voting power or total value of the outstanding
securities of such corporation. The separate existence of a TRS
or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as
discussed above, is not ignored for Federal income tax purposes.
As a result, a parent REIT is not treated as holding the assets
of a TRS or as receiving any income that the TRS earns. Rather,
the stock issued by the TRS is an asset in the hands of the
parent
69
REIT, and the REIT recognizes as income, the dividends, if any,
that it receives from the subsidiary. This treatment can affect
the income and asset test calculations that apply to the REIT,
as described below. Because a parent REIT does not include the
assets and income of such subsidiary corporations in determining
the parents compliance with the REIT requirements, such
entities may be used by the parent REIT to indirectly undertake
activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from
doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries (for
example, activities that give rise to certain categories of
income such as management fees or foreign currency gains). As a
taxable corporation, a TRS is required to pay regular Federal
income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable.
Certain of Aimcos operations (including certain of its
property management, asset management, risk, etc.) are conducted
through its taxable REIT subsidiaries. Because Aimco is not
required to include the assets and income of such taxable REIT
subsidiaries in determining Aimcos compliance with the
REIT requirements, Aimco uses its taxable REIT subsidiaries to
facilitate its ability to offer services and activities to its
residents that are not generally considered as qualifying REIT
services and activities. If Aimco fails to properly structure
and provide such nonqualifying services and activities through
its taxable REIT subsidiaries, its ability to satisfy the REIT
gross income requirement, and also its REIT status, may be
jeopardized.
A TRS may generally engage in any business except the operation
or management of a lodging or health care facility. The
operation or management of a health care or lodging facility
precludes a corporation from qualifying as a TRS. If any of
Aimcos taxable REIT subsidiaries were deemed to operate or
manage a health care or lodging facility, such taxable REIT
subsidiaries would fail to qualify as taxable REIT subsidiaries,
and Aimco would fail to qualify as a REIT. Aimco believes that
none of its taxable REIT subsidiaries operate or manage any
health care or lodging facilities. However, the statute provides
little guidance as to the definition of a health care or lodging
facility. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS
will not contend that any of Aimcos taxable REIT
subsidiaries operate or manage a health care or lodging
facility, disqualifying it from treatment as a TRS, thereby
resulting in the disqualification of Aimco as a REIT.
Several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding
arrangements between a REIT and a TRS ensure that a TRS will be
subject to an appropriate level of Federal income taxation. For
example, a TRS is limited in its ability to deduct interest
payments made to its REIT owner. In addition, Aimco would be
obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it
receives from, or on certain expenses deducted by, its taxable
REIT subsidiaries, if the IRS were to successfully assert that
the economic arrangements between Aimco and its taxable REIT
subsidiaries are not comparable to similar arrangements among
unrelated parties. See Taxation of REITs in
General Penalty Tax.
Income
Tests
In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, Aimco annually
must satisfy two gross income requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
First, at least 75% of Aimcos gross income for each
taxable year, excluding gross income from sales of inventory or
dealer property in prohibited transactions, must be
derived from investments relating to real property or mortgages
on real property, including rents from real
property, dividends received from other REITs, interest
income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property, and
gains from the sale of real estate assets, as well as certain
types of temporary investments.
|
|
|
|
Second, at least 95% of Aimcos gross income for each
taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited
transactions, must be derived from some combination of such
income from investments in real property (i.e., income that
qualifies under the 75% income test described above), as well as
other dividends, interest and gains from the sale or disposition
of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real
property.
|
Rents received by Aimco directly or through the Subsidiary
Partnerships will qualify as rents from real
property in satisfying the gross income requirements
described above, only if several conditions are met, including
the following. If rent is partly attributable to personal
property leased in connection with a lease of real property, the
portion of the total rent attributable to the personal property
will not qualify as rents from real property unless
it constitutes 15% or less of the total rent received under the
lease. Moreover, for rents received to qualify as rents
from real property, the REIT generally must not operate or
manage the property (subject to certain exceptions) or furnish
or render services to the tenants of such property, other than
through an independent contractor from
70
which the REIT derives no revenue. Aimco and its affiliates are
permitted, however, to directly perform services that are
usually or customarily rendered in connection with
the rental of space for occupancy only and are not otherwise
considered rendered to the occupant of the property. In
addition, Aimco and its affiliates may directly or indirectly
provide non-customary services to tenants of its properties
without disqualifying all of the rent from the property if the
payment for such services does not exceed 1% of the total gross
income from the property. For purposes of this test, the income
received from such non-customary services is deemed to be at
least 150% of the direct cost of providing the services.
Moreover, Aimco is generally permitted to provide services to
tenants or others through a TRS without disqualifying the rental
income received from tenants for purposes of the REIT income
requirements.
Aimco manages apartment properties for third parties and
affiliates through its taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable
REIT subsidiaries receive management fees and other income. A
portion of such fees and other income accrue to Aimco through
distributions from the taxable REIT subsidiaries that are
classified as dividend income to the extent of the earnings and
profits of the taxable REIT subsidiaries. Such distributions
will generally qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test
but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any dividends
received by us from a REIT will be qualifying income in our
hands for purposes of both the 95% and 75% income tests.
Any income or gain derived by Aimco directly or through its
Subsidiary Partnerships from instruments that hedge certain
risks, such as the risk of changes in interest rates, will not
constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross
income test, provided that specified requirements are met. Such
requirements include that the instrument hedges risks associated
with indebtedness issued by Aimco or its Subsidiary Partnerships
that is incurred to acquire or carry real estate
assets (as described below under
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Asset Tests), and the instrument
is properly identified as a hedge, along with the risk that it
hedges, within prescribed time periods.
If Aimco fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross
income tests for any taxable year, it may nevertheless qualify
as a REIT for the year if it is entitled to relief under certain
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. These relief provisions
will be generally available if Aimcos failure to meet
these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful
neglect, Aimco attaches a schedule of the sources of its income
to its tax return, and any incorrect information on the schedule
was not due to fraud with intent to evade tax. It is not
possible to state whether Aimco would be entitled to the benefit
of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief
provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances
involving Aimco, Aimco will not qualify as a REIT. As discussed
above under Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of REITs in General,
even where these relief provisions apply, a tax is imposed based
upon the amount by which Aimco fails to satisfy the particular
gross income test.
Asset
Tests
Aimco, at the close of each calendar quarter of its taxable
year, must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature of its
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
First, at least 75% of the value of the total assets of Aimco
total assets must be represented by some combination of
real estate assets, cash, cash items,
U.S. government securities, and under some circumstances,
stock or debt instruments purchased with new capital. For this
purpose, real estate assets include interests in
real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in
real property, stock of other corporations that qualify as
REITs, and some kinds of mortgage backed securities and mortgage
loans. Assets that do not qualify for purposes of the 75% test
are subject to the additional asset tests described below.
|
|
|
|
Second, not more than 25% of Aimcos total assets may be
represented by securities other than those in the 75% asset
class.
|
|
|
|
Third, of the investments included in the 25% asset class, the
value of any one issuers securities owned by Aimco may not
exceed 5% of the value of Aimcos total assets, Aimco may
not own more than 10% of any one issuers outstanding
voting securities, and Aimco may not own more than 10% of the
total value of the
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding securities of any one issuer. The 5% and 10% asset
tests do not apply to securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth, the aggregate value of all securities of taxable REIT
subsidiaries held by Aimco may not exceed 25% of the value of
Aimcos total assets.
|
Aimco believes that the value of the securities held by Aimco in
its taxable REIT subsidiaries will not exceed, in the aggregate,
25% of the value of Aimcos total assets and that
Aimcos ownership interests in its taxable REIT
subsidiaries qualify under the asset tests set forth above.
Notwithstanding the general rule that a REIT is treated as
owning its share of the underlying assets of a subsidiary
partnership for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests, if
a REIT holds indebtedness issued by a partnership, the
indebtedness will be subject to, and may cause a violation of,
the asset tests, resulting in loss of REIT status, unless it is
a qualifying mortgage asset satisfies the rules for
straight debt, or is sufficiently small so as not to
otherwise cause an asset test violation. Similarly, although
stock of another REIT is a qualifying asset for purposes of the
REIT asset tests, non-mortgage debt held by Aimco that is issued
by another REIT may not so qualify.
The Internal Revenue Code contains a number of provisions
applicable to REITs, including relief provisions that make it
easier for REITs to satisfy the asset requirements, or to
maintain REIT qualification notwithstanding certain violations
of the asset and other requirements.
One such provision allows a REIT which fails one or more of the
asset requirements to nevertheless maintain its REIT
qualification if (a) it provides the IRS with a description
of each asset causing the failure, (b) the failure is due
to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, (c) the REIT
pays a tax equal to the greater of (i) $50,000 per failure,
and (ii) the product of the net income generated by the
assets that caused the failure multiplied by the highest
applicable corporate tax rate, and (d) the REIT either
disposes of the assets causing the failure within 6 months
after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the
failure, or otherwise satisfies the relevant asset tests within
that time frame.
A second relief provision contained in the Internal Revenue Code
applies to de minimis violations of the 10% and 5% asset tests.
A REIT may maintain its qualification despite a violation of
such requirements if (a) the value of the assets causing
the violation do not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REITs
total assets, and $10,000,000, and (b) the REIT either
disposes of the assets causing the failure within 6 months
after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the
failure, or the relevant tests are otherwise satisfied within
that time frame.
The Internal Revenue Code also provides that certain securities
will not cause a violation of the 10% value test described
above. Such securities include instruments that constitute
straight debt, which now has an expanded definition
and includes securities having certain contingency features. A
restriction, however, precludes a security from qualifying as
straight debt where a REIT (or a controlled TRS of
the REIT) owns other securities of the issuer of that security
which do not qualify as straight debt, unless the value of those
other securities constitute, in the aggregate, 1% or less of the
total value of that issuers outstanding securities. In
addition to straight debt, the Internal Revenue Code provides
that certain other securities will not violate the 10% value
test. Such securities include (a) any loan made to an
individual or an estate, (b) certain rental agreements in
which one or more payments are to be made in subsequent years
(other than agreements between a REIT and certain persons
related to the REIT), (c) any obligation to pay rents from
real property, (d) securities issued by governmental
entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the
profits of (or payments made by) a non-governmental entity,
(e) any security issued by another REIT, and (f) any
debt instrument issued by a partnership if the
partnerships income is of a nature that it would satisfy
the 75% gross income test described above under
Income Tests. The Internal Revenue Code
also provides that in applying the 10% value test, a debt
security issued by a partnership is not taken into account to
the extent, if any, of the REITs proportionate equity
interest in that partnership.
Aimco believes that its holding of securities and other assets
comply, and will continue to comply, with the foregoing REIT
asset requirements, and it intends to monitor compliance on an
ongoing basis. No independent appraisals have been obtained,
however, to support Aimcos conclusions as to the value of
its assets, including Aimco OPs total assets and the value
of Aimco OPs interest in the taxable REIT subsidiaries.
Moreover, values of some assets may not be susceptible to a
precise determination, and values are subject to change in the
future.
72
Furthermore, the proper classification of an instrument as debt
or equity for Federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in
some circumstances, which could affect the application of the
REIT asset requirements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance
that the IRS will not contend that Aimcos interests in its
subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers will cause a
violation of the REIT asset requirements and loss of REIT status.
If we should fail to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a
calendar quarter, such a failure would not cause us to lose our
REIT status if we (1) satisfied the asset tests at the
close of the preceding calendar quarter and (2) the
discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset test
requirements was not wholly or partly caused by an acquisition
of non-qualifying assets, but instead arose from changes in the
market value of our assets. If the condition described in
(2) were not satisfied, we still could avoid
disqualification by eliminating any discrepancy within
30 days after the close of the calendar quarter in which it
arose.
Annual
Distribution Requirements
In order for Aimco to qualify as a REIT, Aimco is required to
distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to its
stockholders in an amount at least equal to:
(a) 90% of Aimcos REIT taxable income
(computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and
net capital gain of Aimco), and
(b) 90% of the net income, if any, from foreclosure
property (as described below), minus
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of certain items of noncash income.
|
These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which
they relate, or in the following taxable year if they are
declared in October, November, or December of the taxable year,
are payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in any
such month, and are actually paid before the end of January of
the following year. In order for distributions to be counted for
this purpose, and to give rise to a tax deduction by Aimco, they
must not be preferential dividends. A dividend is
not a preferential dividend if it is pro rata among all
outstanding shares of stock within a particular class, and is in
accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock
as set forth in Aimcos organizational documents.
To the extent that Aimco distributes at least 90%, but less than
100%, of its REIT taxable income, as adjusted, it
will be subject to tax thereon at ordinary corporate tax rates.
In any year, Aimco may elect to retain, rather than distribute,
its net capital gain and pay tax on such gain. In such a case,
Aimcos stockholders would include their proportionate
share of such undistributed long-term capital gain in income and
receive a corresponding credit for their share of the tax paid
by Aimco. Aimcos stockholders would then increase the
adjusted basis of their Aimco shares by the difference between
the designated amounts included in their long-term capital gains
and the tax deemed paid with respect to their shares.
To the extent that a REIT has available net operating losses
carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the
amount of distributions that it must make in order to comply
with the REIT distribution requirements. Such losses, however,
will generally not affect the character, in the hands of
stockholders, of any distributions that are actually made by the
REIT, which are generally taxable to stockholders to the extent
that the REIT has current or accumulated earnings and profits.
See Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Stockholders
Taxation of Taxable Domestic Stockholders
Distributions.
If Aimco should fail to distribute during each calendar year at
least the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year,
|
(c) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year
(excluding retained net capital gain), and
(d) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods,
Aimco would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such
required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts
actually distributed, and (y) the amounts of income
retained on which it has paid corporate income tax.
73
It is possible that Aimco, from time to time, may not have
sufficient cash to meet the 90% distribution requirement due to
timing differences between (i) the actual receipt of cash
(including receipt of distributions from Aimco OP) and
(ii) the inclusion of certain items in income by Aimco for
Federal income tax purposes. In the event that such timing
differences occur, in order to meet the distribution
requirements, Aimco may find it necessary to arrange for
short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowings, or to pay
dividends in the form of taxable in-kind distributions of
property.
Under certain circumstances, Aimco may be able to rectify a
failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by
paying deficiency dividends to stockholders in a
later year, which may be included in Aimcos deduction for
dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, Aimco may be
able to avoid losing its REIT status or being taxed on amounts
distributed as deficiency dividends; however, Aimco will be
required to pay interest and a penalty based on the amount of
any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.
Failure
to Qualify
If Aimco fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable
year, and the relief provisions do not apply, Aimco will be
subject to tax, including any applicable alternative minimum
tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates.
Distributions to stockholders in any year in which Aimco fails
to qualify will not be deductible by Aimco nor will they be
required to be made. In such event, to the extent of current and
accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to
stockholders that are individuals will generally be taxable at
long term capital gains rates and, subject to certain
limitations of the Internal Revenue Code, corporate distributees
may be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Unless
Aimco is entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions,
Aimco would also be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as
a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during
which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state
whether, in all circumstances, Aimco would be entitled to this
statutory relief.
Prohibited
Transactions
Net income derived by a REIT from a prohibited transaction is
subject to a 100% excise tax. The term prohibited
transaction generally includes a sale or other disposition
of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a
trade or business. Aimco intends to conduct its operations so
that no asset owned by Aimco or its pass-through subsidiaries
will be held for sale to customers, and that a sale of any such
asset will not be in the ordinary course of Aimcos
business. Whether property is held primarily for sale to
customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business
depends, however, on the particular facts and circumstances. No
assurance can be given that any property sold by Aimco will not
be treated as property held for sale to customers, or that Aimco
can comply with certain safe-harbor provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code that would prevent the imposition of the 100%
excise tax. The 100% tax does not apply to gains from the sale
of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable
corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the
hands of the corporation at regular corporate rates.
Penalty
Tax
Aimco will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the amount of
certain non-arms length payments received from, or certain
expenses deducted by, its taxable REIT subsidiaries if the IRS
were to successfully assert that the economic arrangements
between Aimco and its taxable REIT subsidiaries are not
comparable to similar transaction between unrelated parties.
Such amounts may include rents from real property that are
overstated as a result of services furnished by a TRS to tenants
of Aimco and amounts that are deducted by a TRS for payments
made to Aimco that are in excess of the amounts that would have
been charged by an unrelated party.
Aimco believes that the fees paid to its taxable REIT
subsidiaries for tenant services are comparable to the fees that
would be paid to an unrelated third party negotiating at
arms-length. This determination, however, is inherently
factual, and the IRS may assert that the fees paid by Aimco do
not represent arms-length amounts. If the IRS successfully
made such an assertion, Aimco would be required to pay a 100%
penalty tax on the excess of an arms-length fee for tenant
services over the amount actually paid.
74
Tax
Aspects Of Aimcos Investments In
Partnerships
General
Substantially all of Aimcos investments are held
indirectly through Aimco OP. In general, partnerships are
pass-through entities that are not subject to
Federal income tax. Rather, partners are allocated their
proportionate shares of the items of income, gain, loss,
deduction and credit of a partnership, and are potentially
subject to tax on these items, without regard to whether the
partners receive a distribution from the partnership. Aimco will
include in its income its proportionate share of the foregoing
partnership items for purposes of the various REIT income tests
and in the computation of its REIT taxable income. Moreover, for
purposes of the REIT asset tests, Aimco will include its
proportionate share of assets held by the Subsidiary
Partnerships. See Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Aimco Effect of
Subsidiary Entities Ownership of Partnership
Interests.
Entity
Classification.
Aimcos direct and indirect investment in partnerships
involves special tax considerations, including the possibility
of a challenge by the IRS of the tax status of any of the
Subsidiary Partnerships as a partnership, as opposed to as an
association taxable as a corporation, for Federal income tax
purposes. If any of these entities were treated as an
association for Federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable
as a corporation and therefore could be subject to an
entity-level tax on its income. In such a situation, the
character of Aimcos assets and items of gross income would
change and could preclude Aimco from satisfying the REIT asset
tests and gross income tests (see Taxation of
Aimco and Aimco Stockholders Taxation of
Aimco Asset Tests and
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Aimco Income
Tests), and in turn could prevent Aimco from qualifying as
a REIT unless Aimco is eligible for relief from the violation
pursuant to relief provisions described above. See
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Aimco Failure
to Qualify above for a summary of the effect of
Aimcos failure to satisfy the REIT tests for a taxable
year, and of the relief provisions. In addition, any change in
the status of any of the Subsidiary Partnerships for tax
purposes might be treated as a taxable event, in which case
Aimco might incur a tax liability without any related cash
distributions.
Tax
Allocations With Respect To The Properties.
Under the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations,
income, gain, loss and deduction attributable to appreciated or
depreciated property that is contributed to a partnership in
exchange for an interest in the partnership must be allocated
for tax purposes in a manner such that the contributing partner
is charged with, or benefits from the unrealized gain or
unrealized loss associated with the property at the time of the
contribution. The amount of the unrealized gain or unrealized
loss is generally equal to the difference between the fair
market value of the contributed property at the time of
contribution, and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the
time of contribution (a Book Tax
Difference). Such allocations are solely for Federal
income tax purposes and do not affect the book capital accounts
or other economic or legal arrangements among the partners.
Aimco OP was formed by way of contributions of appreciated
property. Consequently, allocations must be made in a manner
consistent with these requirements. Where a partner contributes
cash to a partnership at a time that the partnership holds
appreciated (or depreciated) property, the Treasury Regulations
provide for a similar allocation of these items to the other
(i.e., non-contributing) partners. These rules apply to the
contribution by Aimco to Aimco OP of the cash proceeds received
in any offerings of its stock.
In general, certain unitholders will be allocated lower amounts
of depreciation deductions for tax purposes and increased
taxable income and gain on the sale by Aimco OP or other
Subsidiary Partnerships of the contributed properties. This will
tend to eliminate the Book-Tax Difference over the life of these
partnerships. However, the special allocations do not always
entirely rectify the Book-Tax Difference on an annual basis or
with respect to a specific taxable transaction such as a sale.
Thus, the carryover basis of the contributed properties in the
hands of Aimco OP or other Subsidiary Partnerships may cause
Aimco to be allocated lower depreciation and other deductions,
and possibly greater amounts of taxable income in the event of a
sale of such contributed assets in excess of the economic or
book income allocated to it as a result of such sale. This may
cause Aimco to recognize, over time, taxable income in excess of
cash proceeds, which might adversely affect Aimcos ability
to comply with
75
the REIT distribution requirements. See
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Aimco Annual
Distribution Requirements.
With respect to any property purchased or to be purchased by any
of the Subsidiary Partnerships (other than through the issuance
of units) subsequent to the formation of Aimco, such property
will initially have a tax basis equal to its fair market value
and the special allocation provisions described above will not
apply.
Sale Of
The Properties.
Aimcos share of any gain realized by Aimco OP or any other
Subsidiary Partnership on the sale of any property held as
inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of business will be treated as income from a prohibited
transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax. See
United States Federal Income Taxation of Aimco
and Aimco Stockholder Taxation of Aimco
Prohibited Transactions. Under existing law, whether
property is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers
in the ordinary course of a partnerships trade or business
is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and
circumstances with respect to the particular transaction. Aimco
OP and the other Subsidiary Partnerships intend to hold their
properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation,
to engage in the business of acquiring, developing, owning and
operating the properties and to make such occasional sales of
the properties, including peripheral land, as are consistent
with Aimcos investment objectives.
Taxation
of Taxable REIT Subsidiaries
A portion of the amounts to be used to fund distributions to
stockholders may come from distributions made by Aimcos
taxable REIT subsidiaries to Aimco OP, and interest paid by the
taxable REIT subsidiaries on certain notes held by Aimco OP. In
general, taxable REIT subsidiaries pay Federal, state and local
income taxes on their taxable income at normal corporate rates.
Any Federal, state or local income taxes that Aimcos
taxable REIT subsidiaries are required to pay will reduce
Aimcos cash flow from operating activities and its ability
to make payments to holders of its securities.
Taxation
of Stockholders
Taxable
Domestic Stockholders
Distributions. Provided that Aimco qualifies
as a REIT, distributions made to Aimcos taxable domestic
stockholders out of current or accumulated earnings and profits
(and not designated as capital gain dividends) will generally be
taken into account by them as ordinary income and will not be
eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations.
With limited exceptions, dividends received from REITs are not
eligible for taxation at the preferential income tax rates for
qualified dividends received by individuals from taxable C
corporations. Stockholders that are individuals, however, are
taxed at the preferential rates on dividends designated by and
received from REITs to the extent that the dividends are
attributable to (i) income retained by the REIT in the
prior taxable year on which the REIT was subject to corporate
level income tax (less the amount of tax), (ii) dividends
received by the REIT from taxable REIT subsidiaries or other
taxable C corporations, or (iii) income in the prior
taxable year from the sales of built-in gain
property acquired by the REIT from C corporations in carryover
basis transactions (less the amount of corporate tax on such
income).
Distributions (and retained net capital gains) that are
designated as capital gain dividends will generally be taxed to
stockholders as long-term capital gains, to the extent that they
do not exceed Aimcos actual net capital gain for the
taxable year, without regard to the period for which the
stockholder has held its stock. However, corporate stockholders
may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain
dividends as ordinary income. Long-term capital gains are
generally taxable at maximum Federal rates of 15% through 2010
(and are set to increase to 20% thereafter, absent further
Congressional action) in the case of stockholders who are
individuals, and 35% in the case of stockholders that are
corporations. Capital gains attributable to the sale of
depreciable real property held for more than 12 months are
subject to a 25% maximum Federal income tax rate for taxpayers
who are individuals, to the extent of previously claimed
depreciation deductions.
76
In determining the extent to which a distribution constitutes a
dividend for tax purposes, Aimcos earnings and profits
generally will be allocated first to distributions with respect
to preferred stock prior to allocating any remaining earnings
and profits to distributions on Aimcos common stock. If
Aimco has net capital gains and designates some or all of its
distributions as capital gain dividends to that extent, the
capital gain dividends will be allocated among different classes
of stock in proportion to the allocation of earnings and profits
as described above.
Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and
profits will not be taxable to a stockholder to the extent that
they do not exceed the adjusted basis of the stockholders
shares in respect of which the distributions were made, but
rather will reduce the adjusted basis of such shares. To the
extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a
stockholders shares, they will be included in income as
long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares
have been held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend
declared by Aimco in October, November or December of any year
and payable to a stockholder of record on a specified date in
any such month will be treated as both paid by Aimco and
received by the stockholder on December 31 of such year,
provided that the dividend is actually paid by Aimco
before the end of January of the following calendar year.
To the extent that a REIT has available net operating losses and
capital losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses
may reduce the amount of distributions that must be made in
order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. See
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco
Stockholders Taxation of Aimco Annual
Distribution Requirements. Such losses, however, are not
passed through to stockholders and do not offset income of
stockholders from other sources, nor would they affect the
character of any distributions that are actually made by a REIT,
which are generally subject to tax in the hands of stockholders
to the extent that the REIT has current or accumulated earnings
and profits.
Dispositions of Aimco Stock. A stockholder
will realize gain or loss upon the sale, redemption or other
taxable disposition of stock in an amount equal to the
difference between the sum of the fair market value of any
property and cash received in such disposition, and the
stockholders adjusted tax basis in the stock at the time
of the disposition. In general, a stockholders tax basis
will equal the stockholders acquisition cost, increased by
the excess of net capital gains deemed distributed to the
stockholder (as discussed above), less tax deemed paid on such
net capital gains, and reduced by returns of capital. In
general, capital gains recognized by individuals upon the sale
or disposition of shares of Aimco stock will be subject to
taxation at long term capital gains rates if the Aimco stock is
held for more than 12 months, and will be taxed at ordinary
income rates if the Aimco stock is held for 12 months or
less. Gains recognized by stockholders that are corporations are
currently subject to Federal income tax at a maximum rate of
35%, whether or not classified as long-term capital gains.
Capital losses recognized by a stockholder upon the disposition
of Aimco stock held for more than one year at the time of
disposition will be considered long-term capital losses, and are
generally available only to offset capital gain income of the
stockholder but not ordinary income (except in the case of
individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each
year). In addition, any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares
of Aimco stock by a stockholder who has held the shares for six
months or less, after applying holding period rules, will be
treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of
distributions received from Aimco that are required to be
treated by the stockholder as long-term capital gain.
A redemption of Aimco stock (including preferred stock or equity
stock) will be treated under Section 302 of the Internal
Revenue Code as a dividend subject to tax at ordinary income tax
rates (to the extent of Aimcos current or accumulated
earnings and profits), unless the redemption satisfies certain
tests set forth in Section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code enabling the redemption to be treated as a sale or exchange
of the stock. The redemption will satisfy such test if it
(i) is substantially disproportionate with
respect to the holder (which will not be the case if only the
stock is redeemed, since it generally does not have voting
rights), (ii) results in a complete termination
of the holders stock interest in Aimco, or (iii) is
not essentially equivalent to a dividend with
respect to the holder, all within the meaning of
Section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. In determining
whether any of these tests have been met, shares considered to
be owned by the holder by reason of certain constructive
ownership rules set forth in the Internal Revenue Code, as well
as shares actually owned, must generally be taken into account.
Because the determination as to whether any of the alternative
tests of Section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue Code is
satisfied with respect to any particular holder of the stock
will depend upon the facts and circumstances as of the time the
determination is made, prospective investors are advised to
consult their own tax advisors to determine such tax treatment.
If a redemption of the stock is treated as a distribution that
is taxable as a dividend, the amount of
77
the distribution would be measured by the amount of cash and the
fair market value of any property received by the stockholders.
The stockholders adjusted tax basis in such redeemed stock
would be transferred to the holders remaining
stockholdings in Aimco. If, however, the stockholder has no
remaining stockholdings in Aimco, such basis may, under certain
circumstances, be transferred to a related person or it may be
lost entirely.
If an investor recognizes a loss upon a subsequent disposition
of stock or other securities of Aimco in an amount that exceeds
a prescribed threshold, it is possible that the provisions of
the Treasury Regulations involving reportable
transactions could apply, with a resulting requirement to
separately disclose the loss generating transaction to the IRS.
While these Treasury Regulations are directed towards tax
shelters, they are written quite broadly, and apply to
transactions that would not typically be considered tax
shelters. In addition, the Internal Revenue Code imposes
penalties for failure to comply with these requirements.
Prospective investors should consult your tax advisors
concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to
the receipt or disposition of stock or securities of Aimco, or
transactions that might be undertaken directly or indirectly by
Aimco. Moreover, prospective investors should be aware that
Aimco and other participants in the transactions involving Aimco
(including their advisors) might be subject to disclosure or
other requirements pursuant to these Treasury Regulations.
Taxation
Of Foreign Stockholders
The following is a summary of certain anticipated
U.S. Federal income and estate tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of securities applicable to
Non-U.S. Holders
of securities. A
Non-U.S. Holder
is generally any person other than (i) a citizen or
resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or
partnership created or organized in the United States or under
the laws of the United States or of any state thereof or the
District of Columbia, (iii) an estate whose income is
includable in gross income for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes regardless of its source or (iv) a trust if a
United States court is able to exercise primary supervision over
the administration of such trust and one or more United States
fiduciaries have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of such trust. The discussion is based on current law
and is for general information only. The discussion addresses
only certain and not all aspects of U.S. Federal income and
estate taxation.
Ordinary Dividends. The portion of dividends
received by
Non-U.S. Holders
payable out of Aimcos earnings and profits which are not
attributable to capital gains of Aimco and which are not
effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the
Non-U.S. Holder
will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30%
(unless reduced by treaty and the
Non-U.S. Holder
provides appropriate documentation regarding its eligibility for
treaty benefits). In general,
Non-U.S. Holders
will not be considered engaged in a U.S. trade or business
solely as a result of their ownership of securities. In cases
where the dividend income from a
Non-U.S. Holders
investment in securities is, or is treated as, effectively
connected with the
Non-U.S. Holders
conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will be subject to U.S. tax at graduated rates,
in the same manner as domestic stockholders are taxed with
respect to such dividends, such income must generally be
reported on a U.S. income tax return filed by or on behalf
of the
non-U.S. holder,
and the income may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax
in the case of a
Non-U.S. Holder
that is a corporation.
Non-Dividend Distributions. Unless Aimco stock
constitutes a United States real property interest (a
USRPI) within the meaning of the Foreign Investment
in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA),
distributions by Aimco which are not dividends out of the
earnings and profits of Aimco will not be subject to
U.S. income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at
which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution
will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the
distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate
applicable to dividends. However, the
Non-U.S. Holder
may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is
subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in
excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits of Aimco.
If Aimco stock constitutes a USRPI, distributions by Aimco in
excess of the sum of its earnings and profits plus the
stockholders basis in its Aimco stock will be taxed under
the FIRPTA at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital
gains rates, that would apply to a domestic stockholder of the
same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as the case may
be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a
refundable withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which
the distribution exceeds the stockholders share of
Aimcos earnings and profits.
78
Capital Gain Dividends. Under FIRPTA, a
distribution made by Aimco to a
Non-U.S. Holder,
to the extent attributable to gains from dispositions of USRPIs
held by Aimco directly or through pass-through subsidiaries
(USRPI Capital Gains), will, except as described
below, be considered effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business of the
Non-U.S. Holder
and will be subject to U.S. income tax at the rates
applicable to U.S. individuals or corporations, without
regard to whether the distribution is designated as a capital
gain dividend. In addition, Aimco will be required to withhold
tax equal to 35% of the amount of dividends to the extent such
dividends constitute USRPI Capital Gains. Distributions subject
to FIRPTA may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax in the
hands of a
Non-U.S. Holder
that is a corporation. A distribution is not a USRPI capital
gain if Aimco held the underlying asset solely as a creditor.
Capital gain dividends received by a
non-U.S. holder
from a REIT that are attributable to dispositions by that REIT
of assets other then USRPIs are generally not subject to
U.S. income or withholding tax.
A capital gain dividend by Aimco that would otherwise have been
treated as a USRPI capital gain will not be so treated or be
subject to FIRPTA, will generally not be treated as income that
is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, and
will instead be treated the same as an ordinary dividend from
Aimco (see Taxation of Foreign
Stockholders Ordinary Dividends), provided
that (1) the capital gain dividend is received with respect
to a class of stock that is regularly traded on an established
securities market located in the United States, and (2) the
recipient
non-U.S. holder
does not own more than 5% of that class of stock at any time
during the one year period ending on the date on which the
capital gain dividend is received.
Dispositions of Aimco Stock. Unless Aimco
stock constitutes a USRPI, a sale of the stock by a
Non-U.S. Holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. taxation under
FIRPTA. The stock will be treated as a USRPI if 50% or more of
Aimcos assets throughout a prescribed testing period
consist of interests in real property located within the United
States, excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property
solely in a capacity as a creditor. Even if the foregoing test
is met, Aimco stock nonetheless will not constitute a USRPI if
Aimco is a domestically controlled qualified investment
entity. A domestically controlled qualified investment
entity is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified
testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares is held
directly or indirectly by
Non-U.S. Holders.
Aimco believes that it is, and it expects to continue to be, a
domestically controlled qualified investment entity. If Aimco
is, and continues to be, a domestically controlled qualified
investment entity, the sale of Aimco stock should not be subject
to taxation under FIRPTA. Because most classes of stock of Aimco
are publicly traded, however, no assurance can be given that
Aimco is or will continue to be a domestically controlled
qualified investment entity.
Even if Aimco does not constitute a domestically controlled
qualified investment entity, a
Non-U.S. Holders
sale of stock generally nonetheless will generally not be
subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
the stock is of a class that is regularly traded (as
defined by applicable Treasury Regulations) on an established
securities market (e.g., the NYSE, on which Aimco stock is
listed), and
|
|
|
|
the selling
Non-U.S. Holder
held 5% or less of such class of Aimcos outstanding stock
at all times during a specified testing period.
|
If gain on the sale of stock of Aimco were subject to taxation
under FIRPTA, the
Non-U.S. Holder
would be subject to the same treatment as a
U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain (subject to
applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative
minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals) and
the purchaser of the stock could be required to withhold 10% of
the purchase price and remit such amount to the IRS.
Gain from the sale of Aimco stock that would not otherwise be
subject to taxation under FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in
the United States to a
Non-U.S. Holder
in two cases. First, if the
Non-U.S. Holders
investment in the Aimco stock is effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business conducted by such
Non-U.S. Holder,
the
Non-U.S. Holder
will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder
with respect to such gain. Second, if the
Non-U.S. Holder
is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United
States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has
a tax home in the United States, the nonresident
alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the
individuals capital gain.
79
Estate
Tax
Aimco stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is
not a citizen or resident (as specially defined for
U.S. Federal estate tax purposes) of the United States at
the time of death will be includible in the individuals
gross estate for U.S. Federal estate tax purposes, unless
an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise. Such
individuals estate may be subject to U.S. Federal
estate tax on the property includible in the estate for
U.S. Federal estate tax purposes.
Information
Reporting Requirements And Backup Withholding
Aimco will report to its U.S. stockholders and to the IRS
the amount of distributions paid during each calendar year, and
the amount of tax withheld, if any. Under the backup withholding
rules, a stockholder may be subject to backup withholding (at a
rate of 28% through 2010 and a rate of 31% thereafter, absent
further Congressional action) with respect to distributions
paid unless such holder (i) is a corporation or comes
within certain other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact or (ii) provides a taxpayer
identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from
backup withholding, and otherwise complies with the applicable
requirements of the backup withholding rules. A stockholder who
does not provide Aimco with his correct taxpayer identification
number also may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any
amount paid as backup withholding will be creditable against the
stockholders income tax liability. In addition, Aimco may
be required to withhold a portion of capital gain distributions
to any
Non-U.S. Holders.
The IRS has issued final Treasury Regulations regarding the
withholding, backup withholding and information reporting rules
as applied to
Non-U.S. Holders.
Prospective investors in securities should consult their tax
advisors regarding the application of these Treasury Regulations.
Tax
Return Disclosure and Investor List Requirements
Treasury Regulations require participants in a reportable
transaction to disclose certain information about the
transaction to the IRS with their tax returns and retain certain
information relating to the transaction (the Disclosure
Requirement). In addition, organizers, sellers, and
certain advisors of a reportable transaction are required to
maintain certain records, including lists identifying the
investors in a transaction, and to furnish those records, as
well as detailed information regarding the transaction, to the
IRS upon demand (the List Maintenance Requirement).
While the Disclosure Requirement and the List Maintenance
Requirement are directed towards tax shelters, the
regulations are written quite broadly, and apply to transactions
that would not typically be considered tax shelters. There are
significant penalties for failure to comply with these
requirements.
A transaction may be a reportable transaction based upon any of
several indicia, including, among other things, if it could
result in tax losses or book-tax differences in excess of
prescribed thresholds. The transaction contemplated herein may
result in book-tax differences in excess of prescribed
thresholds and as such, could be a reportable transaction under
the Treasury Regulations involving tax shelters.
Characterization of this transaction as a reportable transaction
could increase the likelihood of an audit by the IRS. If this
transaction were to be classified as a reportable transaction,
you would be required to attach a completed IRS Form 8886,
the Reportable Transaction Disclosure Statement, to
your tax return for the taxable year of the transaction, as well
as provide a copy of this form to the Office of Tax Shelter
Analysis at the same time that such statement is first filed
with the IRS. You should consult your tax advisors concerning
these disclosure obligations with respect to the receipt or
disposition of Aimco Stock, or transactions that might be
undertaken directly or indirectly by the Aimco. Moreover, you
should be aware that Aimco and other participants in the
transactions involving Aimco (including their advisors) would be
subject to the Disclosure Requirement
and/or the
List Maintenance Requirement if this transaction were to be
classified as a reportable transaction.
Taxation
of Tax-Exempt Stockholders
Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and
profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts,
generally are exempt from Federal income taxation. However, they
are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable
income (UBTI). While many investments in real estate
may generate UBTI, the IRS has ruled that dividend distributions
from a REIT to a tax-exempt entity do not constitute UBTI. Based
on that
80
ruling, and provided that (1) a tax-exempt stockholder has
not held its Aimco stock as debt financed property
within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e., where the
acquisition or holding of the property is financed through a
borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder), and (2) the Aimco
stock is not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business,
Aimco believe that distributions from Aimco and income from the
sale of the Aimco stock should not give rise to UBTI to a
tax-exempt stockholder.
Tax-exempt stockholder that are social clubs, voluntary employee
benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts,
and qualified group legal services plans that are exempt from
taxation under paragraphs (7), (9), (17) and (20),
respectively, of Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue
Code are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will
require them to characterize distributions from Aimco as UBTI.
In addition, in certain circumstances, a pension trust that owns
more than 10% of Aimcos stock could be required to treat a
percentage of the dividends from Aimco as UBTI (the UBTI
Percentage). The UBTI Percentage is the gross income
derived by Aimco from an unrelated trade or business (determined
as if Aimco were a pension trust) divided by the gross income of
Aimco for the year in which the dividends are paid. The UBTI
rule applies to a pension trust holding more than 10% of
Aimcos stock only if:
|
|
|
|
|
the UBTI Percentage is at least 5%,
|
|
|
|
Aimco qualifies as a REIT by reason of the modification of the
5/50
Rule that allows the beneficiaries of the pension trust to be
treated as holding shares of Aimco in proportion to their
actuarial interest in the pension trust, and
|
|
|
|
either (A) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the
value of Aimcos stock or (B) a group of pension
trusts each individually holding more than 10% of the value of
Aimcos stock collectively owns more than 50% of the value
of Aimcos stock.
|
The restrictions on ownership and transfer of Aimcos stock
should prevent an Exempt Organization from owning more than 10%
of the value of Aimcos stock.
Other Tax
Consequences
Legislative
or Other Actions Affecting REITs
The rules dealing with Federal income taxation are constantly
under review by persons involved in the legislative process and
by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. For example,
Congress is considering proposals that would delay the scheduled
increase in the maximum tax rates applicable to individual
taxpayers on qualified dividend income and long term capital
gains, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010,
to 39.6% and 20% respectively. In addition, for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2012, certain
U.S. holders who are individuals, estates or trusts and
whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be required to pay
a 3.8% Medicare tax on dividend and other income, including
capital gains from the sale or other disposition of our stock.
No assurance can be given as to whether, or in what form, the
proposals described above (or any other proposals affecting
REITs or their stockholders) will be enacted. Changes to the
Federal laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect
an investment in Aimco or Aimco OP.
Recently enacted legislation will require, after
December 31, 2012, withholding at a rate of 30% on
dividends in respect of, and gross proceeds from the sale of,
our common stock held by or through certain foreign financial
institutions (including investment funds), unless such
institution enters into an agreement with the Secretary of the
Treasury to report, on an annual basis, information with respect
to shares in the institution held by certain United States
persons and by certain non-US entities that are wholly or
partially owned by United States persons. Accordingly, the
entity through which our common stock is held will affect the
determination of whether such withholding is required.
Similarly, dividends in respect of, and gross proceeds from the
sale of, our common stock held by an investor that is a
non-financial non-US entity will be subject to withholding at a
rate of 30%, unless such entity either (i) certifies to us
that such entity does not have any substantial United
States owners or (ii) provides certain information
regarding the entitys substantial United States
owners, which we will in turn provide to the
81
Secretary of the Treasury.
Non-United
States stockholders are encouraged to consult with their tax
advisors regarding the possible implications of the legislation
on their investment in our common stock.
State,
Local And Foreign Taxes
Aimco OP, OP Unitholders, Aimco and Aimco stockholders may
be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various
jurisdictions, including those in which it or they transact
business, own property or reside. It should be noted that Aimco
OP owns properties located in a number of states and local
jurisdictions, and Aimco OP and OP Unitholders may be
required to file income tax returns in some or all of those
jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of
Aimco OP and OP Unitholders and of Aimco and its
stockholders may not conform to the United States Federal income
tax consequences discussed above. Consequently, prospective
investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the
application and effect of state, local foreign tax laws on an
investment in Aimco OP or Aimco.
82
FEES AND
EXPENSES
The costs of planning and implementing the merger, including the
preparation of this information statement/prospectus, will be
borne by Aimco OP without regard to whether the merger is
effectuated. Except as set forth in this information
statement/prospectus, Aimco OP will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer or other person in connection
with the merger. The Corporate General Partner has retained
Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, or the Information Agent, to act
as the information agent in connection with the merger. The
Information Agent may contact holders of USRP Units by mail,
e-mail,
telephone, telex, telegraph and in person and may request
brokers, dealers and other nominee limited partners to forward
materials relating to the merger to the beneficial owners of
USRP Units. Aimco OP will pay the Information Agent reasonable
and customary compensation for its services in connection with
the merger, plus reimbursement for
out-of-pocket
expenses, and will indemnify it against certain liabilities and
expenses in connection therewith, including liabilities under
the United States Federal securities laws. Aimco OP will also
pay all costs and expenses of filing, printing and mailing the
information statement/prospectus as well as any related legal
fees and expenses.
Below is an itemized list of the estimated expenses incurred and
to be incurred in connection with preparing and delivering this
information statement/prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Information Agent Fees
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Printing Fees
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Postage Fees
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
Tax and Accounting Fees
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Appraisal Fees
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
Legal Fees
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
LEGAL
MATTERS
Certain tax matters will be passed upon for Aimco by Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. The validity of the
Aimco Class A Common Stock issuable upon redemption of the
OP Units will be passed upon by DLA Piper LLP (US). The
validity of the OP Units offered by this information
statement/prospectus will be passed upon by Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.
84
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Aimco for the year
ended December 31, 2009 appearing in Aimcos Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 19, 2010 (including the schedule appearing
therein), and the effectiveness of Aimcos internal control
over financial reporting appearing in Aimcos Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon, included
therein, and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated
financial statements and Aimco managements assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009 are incorporated herein by
reference in reliance upon such reports given on the authority
of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Aimco OP for the year
ended December 31, 2009 appearing in Aimco OPs
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 19, 2010 (including the schedule appearing
therein), and the effectiveness of Aimco OPs internal
control over financial reporting appearing in Aimco OPs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon, included
therein, and included in Annex I and
Annex G to this information statement/prospectus.
Such consolidated financial statements and Aimco OP
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009
are included herein in reliance upon such reports given on the
authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of USRP appearing in USRPs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon, included
therein, and included in Annex D of this information
statement/prospectus. Such financial statements are included in
reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
85
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Information
Incorporated by Reference
Aimco, Aimco OP and USRP are subject to the informational
requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance therewith,
file reports, proxy statements and other information with the
SEC. You may read and copy any document so filed at the
SECs public reference rooms in Washington, D.C.; New
York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference rooms.
Aimcos, Aimco OPs and USRPs filings are also
available to the public at the SECs web site at
http://www.sec.gov.
The information that Aimco files with the SEC is incorporated by
reference, which means that important information is being
disclosed to you by referring you to those documents. The
information incorporated by reference is considered to be part
of this information statement/prospectus. The documents listed
below are incorporated by reference along with all documents
filed by us with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c),
14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (i) after the date of the
initial registration statement of which this information
statement/prospectus is a part, and prior to effectiveness of
such registration statement, and (ii) after the date of
this information statement/prospectus and prior to the
completion of the offering of securities described in this
information statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Aimco;
|
|
|
|
Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aimcos Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
dated February 2, 2010 (filed February 4, 2010), dated
February 3, 2010 (filed February 5, 2010), dated
April 26, 2010 (filed April 29, 2010), dated
May 24, 2010 (filed May 24, 2010), dated July 30,
2010 (filed July 30, 2010), dated September 1, 2010
(filed September 3, 2010), dated September 7, 2010
(filed September 7, 2010), dated September 10, 2010
(filed September 10, 2010), dated September 29, 2010
(filed September 30, 2010), dated October 29, 2010
(filed October 29, 2010) and dated November 19, 2010
(filed November 19, 2010).
|
You may request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing
or calling Aimco at the following address and telephone number:
ISTC Corporation
P.O. Box 2347
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(864) 239-1029
You should rely only on the information included or incorporated
by reference in this information statement/prospectus. No person
is authorized to provide you with different information. You
should not assume that the information in this information
statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the
date on the front of the document.
Information
Included in the Annexes to this Information
Statement/Prospectus
Important information is also included in the Annexes attached
hereto, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Annex A Agreement and Plan of Merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex B Appraisal Rights of Limited Partners;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex C Officers and Directors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex D USRPs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex E USRPs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex F Summary of Appraisal Table;
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
Annex G Aimco OPs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (excluding the report
of the independent registered public accounting firm, the
financial statements and the notes thereto);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex H Aimco OPs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex I Aimco OPs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2010, which includes
Aimco OPs Selected Financial Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for
the year ended December 31, 2009, revised to reflect
discontinued operations and changes in business segments.
|
References to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 are included in
USRPs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 which is included as
Annex D to this information statement/prospectus; in
USRPs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which is included
as Annex E to this information statement/prospectus; in
Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which are
incorporated by reference in this information
statement/prospectus; and in Aimco OPs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which are
incorporated by reference in this information
statement/prospectus. However, because the merger is a
going private transaction, those safe-harbor
provisions do not apply to any forward-looking statements USRP
or Aimco make in connection with the merger.
87
ANNEX A
Agreement
and Plan of Merger
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this
Agreement), dated as of October 8, 2010,
by and among U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a
Delaware limited partnership (USRP), AIMCO
USRP MERGER SUB LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
Aimco Subsidiary), and AIMCO PROPERTIES,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (Aimco
OP).
WHEREAS, U.S. Realty I Corporation, the corporate general
partner of USRP (U.S. Realty I), has
determined that the Merger (as defined below) of the Aimco
Subsidiary with and into USRP, with USRP as the surviving
entity, is advisable and in the best interests of USRP and its
partners; and
WHEREAS, Aimco OP, the individual general partner of USRP, has
determined that the Merger of the Aimco Subsidiary with and into
USRP, with USRP as the surviving entity, is advisable and in the
best interests of USRP and its partners; and
WHEREAS, Aimco OP, the sole member of the Aimco Subsidiary, has
determined that the Merger of the Aimco Subsidiary with and into
USRP, with USRP as the surviving entity, is advisable and in the
best interests of the Aimco Subsidiary and its member; and
WHEREAS the Board of Directors of AIMCO-GP, Inc., the general
partner of Aimco OP (AIMCO-GP), has
determined that the Merger of the Aimco Subsidiary with and into
USRP, with USRP as the surviving entity, is advisable and in the
best interests of Aimco OP and its partners; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter this Agreement to evidence
the terms, provisions, representations, warranties, covenants
and conditions upon which the Merger will be consummated.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and
covenants set forth herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the adequacy, sufficiency, and receipt of which
are hereby acknowledged, USRP, the Aimco Subsidiary and Aimco OP
hereby agree as follows:
Section
1. The Merger. Subject to
the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Aimco Subsidiary
shall be merged with and into USRP (the
Merger), and USRP shall be the surviving
entity of the Merger (the Surviving Entity).
The Merger will have the effects specified in this Agreement,
section 17-211
of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as
amended (the DRULPA), and
section 18-209
of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, as amended (the
DLLCA)
Section
2. General
Partners. U.S. Realty I will be the
corporate general partner of the Surviving Entity, and Aimco OP
will be the individual general partner of the Surviving Entity.
Section
3. Certificate. As soon as
practicable after the approval of this Agreement by a majority
in interest limited partnership interests of USRP (each a
Unit and, collectively, the
Units), USRP shall cause to be filed a
certificate of merger with respect to the Merger (the
Certificate of Merger) with the Office of the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware pursuant to
section 17-211
of the DRULPA and
section 18-209
of the DLLCA. The Merger shall become effective at such time as
the Certificate of Merger has been accepted for record by the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the
Effective Time).
Section
4. Limited Partnership
Agreement. The agreement of limited partnership
of USRP as in effect immediately prior to the consummation of
the Merger (the Partnership Agreement), shall
be the agreement of limited partnership of the Surviving Entity
until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions
thereof and applicable law. The general partners and each
limited partner of the Surviving Entity shall have the rights
under, be bound by and be subject to the terms and conditions
of, the Partnership Agreement, as a general partner or limited
partner, as applicable.
A-1
Section
5. Treatment of Interests in USRP.
(a) Limited Partners Interests.
(i) In connection with the Merger and in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Section 5(a)(iii) hereto, each
Unit outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and
held by limited partners of USRP, except Units held by limited
partners who have perfected their appraisal rights pursuant to
Exhibit A hereto, shall be converted into the right
to receive, at the election of the limited partner, either
(x) $2.76 in cash (the Cash
Consideration) or (y) a number of partnership
common units of Aimco OP calculated by dividing $2.76 by the
average closing price of Apartment Investment and Management
Company common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten
consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day
immediately prior to the Effective Time (the
OP Unit Consideration and, together with
the Cash Consideration, the Merger
Consideration).
(ii) Notwithstanding Section 5(a)(i), if Aimco OP
determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of
partnership common units of Aimco OP in that state or
jurisdiction (or that the registration in that state or other
jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited
partner will only be entitled to receive the Cash Consideration
for each Unit.
(iii) Aimco OP shall prepare a form of election (the
Election Form) describing the Merger and
pursuant to which each limited partner of USRP will have the
right to elect to receive either the Cash Consideration or the
OP Unit Consideration (subject to Section 5(a)(ii)).
Aimco OP shall mail or cause to be mailed an Election Form to
each limited partner, together with any other materials that
Aimco OP determines to be necessary or prudent, no later than
ten (10) days after the Effective Time. An election to
receive the Cash Consideration or the OP Unit Consideration
shall be effective only if a properly executed Election Form is
received by Aimco OP or its designees prior to 5:00 p.m.,
Eastern Time on the day that is thirty (30) days after the
mailing of such Election Form by Aimco OP. If a limited partner
fails to return a duly completed Election Form within the time
period specified in the Election Form, such holder shall be
deemed to have elected to receive the Cash Consideration. In
addition, each limited partner that resides in a state or other
jurisdiction that Aimco OP determines would prohibit the
issuance of partnership common units of Aimco OP (or in which
registration would be prohibitively costly) will be deemed to
have elected the Cash Consideration. USRP, the Aimco Subsidiary
and Aimco OP agree that limited partners shall have the right to
revoke any election made in connection with the Merger at any
time prior to the expiration of the time period stated in the
Election Form. Aimco OP and U.S. Realty I, by mutual
agreement, shall have the right to make rules, not inconsistent
with the terms of this Agreement, governing the validity of
Election Forms and the issuance and delivery of the Merger
Consideration, as applicable.
(b) General Partners
Interests. Each general partner interest of
USRP outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the Merger
shall remain outstanding and unchanged, with all of the rights
set forth in the Partnership Agreement.
Section
6. Treatment of Interests in Aimco
Subsidiary. The entire membership interest in the
Aimco Subsidiary immediately prior to the Effective Time shall
be converted into all of the Units of the Surviving Entity.
Section
7. Appraisal Rights. In
connection with the Merger, the holders of Units immediately
prior to the Merger shall have the appraisal rights set forth in
Exhibit A hereto.
Section
8. Covenants. Aimco OP
agrees to pay for, or reimburse USRP for, all expenses incurred
by USRP in connection with the Merger. Aimco OP agrees to pay
cash or issue and deliver common units of Aimco OP to the former
holders of Units, in accordance with section 5(a) of this
Agreement.
Section
9. Conditions to the Merger.
(a) The Merger shall not occur unless and until the Merger
has been approved or consented to by a majority in interests of
Units.
(b) Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement to the
contrary, none of the parties hereto shall be required to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby if any
third-party consent, authorization or approval that any of the
parties hereto deem necessary or desirable in connection with
this Agreement, or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, has not been obtained or received.
A-2
Section
10. Tax Treatment. The
parties hereto intend and agree that, for Federal income tax
purposes, (i) any payment of cash for Units shall be
treated as a sale of such Units by such holder and a purchase of
such Units by Aimco OP for the cash so paid under the terms of
this Agreement in accordance with the guidelines set forth in
Treas. Reg.
Sections 1.708-1(c)(3)
and 1.708-1(c)(4), and (ii) each such holder of Units who
receives cash explicitly agrees and consents to such treatment.
Furthermore, the parties hereto intend and agree that, for
Federal income tax purposes, (x) any exchange of Units for
partnership common units of Aimco OP under the terms of this
Agreement shall be treated in accordance with Sections 721
and 731 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
(y) each such holder of Units who accepts partnership
common units of Aimco OP explicitly agrees and consents to such
treatment. Any cash
and/or
partnership common units of Aimco OP to which a holder of Units
is entitled pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid only after
the receipt of a consent from such holder that, for Federal
income tax purposes, the receipt of cash
and/or
partnership common units of Aimco OP shall be treated as
described in this Section 10.
Section
11. Further Assurances. From
time to time, as and when required by the Surviving Entity or by
its successors and assigns, there shall be executed and
delivered on behalf of the Aimco Subsidiary such deeds and other
instruments, and there shall be taken or caused to be taken by
the Aimco Subsidiary all such further actions, as shall be
appropriate or necessary in order to vest, perfect or confirm,
of record or otherwise, in the Surviving Entity the title to and
possession of all property, interests, assets, rights,
privileges, immunities, powers, franchises and authority of the
Aimco Subsidiary, and otherwise to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement, and the officers and directors of
U.S. Realty I are fully authorized, in the name and on
behalf of the Aimco Subsidiary or otherwise, to take any and all
such action and to execute and deliver any and all such deeds
and other instruments.
Section
12. Amendment. Subject to
applicable law, this Agreement may be amended, modified or
supplemented by written agreement of the parties hereto at any
time prior to the consummation of the Merger with respect to any
of the terms contained herein.
Section
13. Abandonment. At any time
prior to consummation of the Merger, this Agreement may be
terminated and the Merger may be abandoned without liability to
any party hereto by any of the Aimco Subsidiary, Aimco OP or
USRP, in each case, acting in its sole discretion and for any
reason or for no reason, notwithstanding approval of this
Agreement by any of the members of the Aimco Subsidiary, the
partners of USRP or the general partner of Aimco OP.
Section
14. Governing Law. This
Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to the
conflict of law provisions thereof.
Section
15. No Third-Party
Beneficiaries. No provision of this Agreement is
intended to confer upon any person, entity, or organization
other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder,
other than the appraisal rights given to holders of Units
pursuant to Section 7.
A-3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, USRP, the Aimco Subsidiary and Aimco
OP have caused this Agreement to be signed by their respective
duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.
U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
U.S. Realty I Corporation
Its Corporate General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Title:
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Aimco Properties, L.P.
Its Individual General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc.
Its General Partner
|
Name:
Title:
AIMCO USRP MERGER SUB LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Aimco Properties, L.P.
Its sole Member
|
|
|
By:
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc.
its General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Title:
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc.,
its General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Title
[Signature Page Merger Agreement]
A-4
EXHIBIT A
Appraisal
Rights of Limited Partners
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of October 8, 2010 (the Merger
Agreement), by and among U.S. Realty Partners
Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
(USRP), AIMCO USRP Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the Aimco
Subsidiary), and AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (Aimco OP). In connection
with the Merger, limited partners of USRP shall have the
following appraisal rights:
(a) Any limited partner who holds Units on the effective
date of the Merger who has not consented to the merger (the
Nonconsenting Limited Partners) and who has
otherwise complied with paragraph (b) hereof shall be
entitled to an appraisal by arbitration of the fair value of the
Nonconsenting Limited Partners Units. This arbitration
shall be conducted in Denver, Colorado, in accordance with the
Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration
Association by a panel of three arbitrators selected by Aimco
OP. Any arbitration award shall be appealable in the Federal
District Court located in Denver, Colorado.
(b) Within 10 days after the effective date of the
Merger, Aimco OP shall notify each of the Nonconsenting Limited
Partners of the consummation of the Merger, the effective date
of the Merger and that appraisal rights are available for any or
all Units held by Nonconsenting Limited Partners, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this Exhibit. Such notice shall
include an Election Form pursuant to which Nonconsenting Limited
Partners may elect an appraisal by arbitration of the fair value
of their Units pursuant to paragraph (a) hereof. Any
limited partner who holds Units on the effective date of the
Merger and who has not consented to the Merger shall be entitled
to receive such notice and may, within 30 days after the
date of mailing of such notice (such 30th day being the
Election Deadline), demand from Aimco OP the
appraisal of his or her Units by making the appropriate election
in the Election Form in accordance with the instructions
thereto. Each completed Election Form must be delivered to the
address, and within the time period, specified in the
instructions to the Election Form. If a Nonconsenting Limited
Partner fails to properly complete an Election Form or return it
to the correct address within the specified time period, such
Nonconsenting Limited Partner shall be deemed to have elected
not to seek an appraisal of his or her Units, and will be deemed
to have elected the Cash Consideration.
(c) At any time prior to the Election Deadline, any
Nonconsenting Limited Partner who has made a demand for
appraisal of his or her Units shall have the right to withdraw
his or her demand for appraisal and to accept the Cash
Consideration payable pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
Nonconsenting Limited Partners who wish to withdraw their
demands must do so in writing delivered to Aimco Properties,
L.P.,
c/o Eagle
Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive,
Cranford, New Jersey, 07016, or by fax at
(908) 497-2349.
At any time prior to 20 days after the Election Deadline,
any Nonconsenting Limited Partner who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (b) hereof, upon
written request, shall be entitled to receive from Aimco OP a
statement setting forth the aggregate number of Units with
respect to which Nonconsenting Limited Partners have made
demands for appraisal and the aggregate number of holders of
such Units. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
Nonconsenting Limited Partner within 10 days after such
Nonconsenting Limited Partners written request for such a
statement is received by Aimco OP or within 20 days after
the Election Deadline, whichever is later.
(d) Upon the submission of any such demand by a
Nonconsenting Limited Partner, Aimco OP shall, within
40 days after the Election Deadline, submit to the
arbitration panel a duly verified list containing the names and
addresses of all Nonconsenting Limited Partners who have
demanded payment for their Units and with whom agreements as to
the value of their Units have not been reached with Aimco OP.
The arbitration panel shall give notice of the time and place
fixed for the hearing of such demand by registered or certified
mail to Aimco OP and to the Nonconsenting Limited Partners shown
on the list at the addresses therein stated. The forms of the
notices shall be approved by the panel, and the costs thereof
shall be borne by Aimco OP.
A-5
(e) At the hearing on such demand, the panel shall
determine the Nonconsenting Limited Partners who have become
entitled to appraisal rights hereunder.
(f) After determining the Nonconsenting Limited Partners
entitled to an appraisal, the panel shall appraise the Units,
determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value
arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the panel shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the panel in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the Merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge), as established from
time to time during the period between the effective date of the
Merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by Aimco OP or by any Nonconsenting Limited Partner entitled to
participate in the appraisal proceeding, the panel may, in its
discretion, proceed with the appraisal prior to the final
determination of the Nonconsenting Limited Partners entitled to
an appraisal. Any Nonconsenting Limited Partner whose name
appears on the list submitted by Aimco OP pursuant to paragraph
(d) hereof may participate fully in all proceedings until
it is finally determined that such Nonconsenting Limited Partner
is not entitled to appraisal rights hereunder.
(g) The panel shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the Units, together with interest, if any, by Aimco OP to the
Nonconsenting Limited Partners entitled thereto. Payment shall
be so made to each such Nonconsenting Limited Partner upon the
receipt by Aimco OP of the written consent from such
Nonconsenting Limited Partner that, for federal income tax
purposes, the issuance of cash for the Units shall be treated as
a sale of the Units by the owner and a purchase of such Units by
Aimco OP for the cash consideration so paid under the terms of
the Merger Agreement in accordance with the guidelines set forth
in Treas. Reg. Sections 1.708-1(c)(3) and 1.708-1(c)(4).
(h) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
panel and taxed upon the parties as the panel deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a Nonconsenting Limited
Partner, the panel may order all or a portion of the expenses
incurred by any Nonconsenting Limited Partner in connection with
the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of
experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the
interests entitled to an appraisal.
(i) From and after the effective date of the Merger, no
Nonconsenting Limited Partner who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in paragraph (b) hereof shall be entitled to
vote such Units for any purpose or to receive payment of
distributions on such interests (except distributions payable as
of a record date prior to the effective date of the Merger);
provided, however, that if such Nonconsenting Limited Partner
shall deliver to Aimco Properties, L.P.,
c/o Eagle
Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive,
Cranford, New Jersey, 07016, or by fax at
(908) 497-2349,
a written withdrawal of such Nonconsenting Limited
Partners demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the
Cash Consideration payable pursuant to the Merger Agreement,
either as provided in paragraph (c) hereof or thereafter
with the written approval of Aimco OP, then the right of such
Nonconsenting Limited Partner to an appraisal shall cease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding before
the panel shall be dismissed as to any Nonconsenting Limited
Partner without the approval of the panel, and such approval may
be conditioned upon such terms as the panel deems just.
A-6
ANNEX B
Appraisal
Rights of Limited Partners
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of October 8, 2010 (the Merger
Agreement), by and among U.S. Realty Partners
Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
(USRP), AIMCO USRP Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the Aimco
Subsidiary), and AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (Aimco OP). In connection
with the Merger, limited partners of USRP shall have the
following appraisal rights:
(a) Any limited partner who holds USRP Units on the
effective date of the Merger who has not consented to the merger
(the Nonconsenting Limited Partners) and who
has otherwise complied with paragraph (b) hereof shall be
entitled to an appraisal by arbitration of the fair value of the
Nonconsenting Limited Partners Units. This arbitration
shall be conducted in Denver, Colorado, in accordance with the
Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration
Association by a panel of three arbitrators selected by Aimco
OP. Any arbitration award shall be appealable in the Federal
District Court located in Denver, Colorado.
(b) Within 10 days after the effective date of the
Merger, Aimco OP shall notify each of the Nonconsenting Limited
Partners of the consummation of the Merger, the effective date
of the Merger and that appraisal rights are available for any or
all Units held by Nonconsenting Limited Partners, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this Exhibit. Such notice shall
include an Election Form pursuant to which Nonconsenting Limited
Partners may elect an appraisal by arbitration of the fair value
of their Units pursuant to paragraph (a) hereof. Any
limited partner who holds Units on the effective date of the
Merger and who has not consented to the Merger shall be entitled
to receive such notice and may, within 30 days after the
date of mailing of such notice (such 30th day being the
Election Deadline), demand from Aimco OP the
appraisal of his or her Units by making the appropriate election
in the Election Form in accordance with the instructions
thereto. Each completed Election Form must be delivered to the
address, and within the time period, specified in the
instructions to the Election Form. If a Nonconsenting Limited
Partner fails to properly complete an Election Form or return it
to the correct address within the specified time period, such
Nonconsenting Limited Partner shall be deemed to have elected
not to seek an appraisal of his or her Units, and will be deemed
to have elected the Cash Consideration.
(c) At any time prior to the Election Deadline, any
Nonconsenting Limited Partner who has made a demand for
appraisal of his or her Units shall have the right to withdraw
his or her demand for appraisal and to accept the Cash
Consideration payable pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
Nonconsenting Limited Partners who wish to withdraw their
demands must do so in writing delivered to Aimco Properties,
L.P.,
c/o Eagle
Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive,
Cranford, New Jersey, 07016, or by fax at
(908) 497-2349.
At any time prior to 20 days after the Election Deadline,
any Nonconsenting Limited Partner who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (b) hereof, upon
written request, shall be entitled to receive from Aimco OP a
statement setting forth the aggregate number of Units with
respect to which Nonconsenting Limited Partners have made
demands for appraisal and the aggregate number of holders of
such Units. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
Nonconsenting Limited Partner within 10 days after such
Nonconsenting Limited Partners written request for such a
statement is received by Aimco OP or within 20 days after
the Election Deadline, whichever is later.
(d) Upon the submission of any such demand by a
Nonconsenting Limited Partner, Aimco OP shall, within
40 days after the Election Deadline, submit to the
arbitration panel a duly verified list containing the names and
addresses of all Nonconsenting Limited Partners who have
demanded payment for their Units and with whom agreements as to
the value of their Units have not been reached with Aimco OP.
The arbitration panel shall give notice of the time and place
fixed for the hearing of such demand by registered or certified
mail to Aimco OP and to the Nonconsenting Limited Partners shown
on the list at the addresses therein stated. The forms of the
notices shall be approved by the panel, and the costs thereof
shall be borne by Aimco OP.
B-1
(e) At the hearing on such demand, the panel shall
determine the Nonconsenting Limited Partners who have become
entitled to appraisal rights hereunder.
(f) After determining the Nonconsenting Limited Partners
entitled to an appraisal, the panel shall appraise the Units,
determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value
arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the panel shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the panel in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the Merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge), as established from
time to time during the period between the effective date of the
Merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by Aimco OP or by any Nonconsenting Limited Partner entitled to
participate in the appraisal proceeding, the panel may, in its
discretion, proceed with the appraisal prior to the final
determination of the Nonconsenting Limited Partners entitled to
an appraisal. Any Nonconsenting Limited Partner whose name
appears on the list submitted by Aimco OP pursuant to paragraph
(d) hereof may participate fully in all proceedings until
it is finally determined that such Nonconsenting Limited Partner
is not entitled to appraisal rights hereunder.
(g) The panel shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the Units, together with interest, if any, by Aimco OP to the
Nonconsenting Limited Partners entitled thereto. Payment shall
be so made to each such Nonconsenting Limited Partner upon the
receipt by Aimco OP of the written consent from such
Nonconsenting Limited Partner that, for federal income tax
purposes, the issuance of cash for the Units shall be treated as
a sale of the Units by the owner and a purchase of such Units by
Aimco OP for the cash consideration so paid under the terms of
the Merger Agreement in accordance with the guidelines set forth
in Treas. Reg. Sections 1.708-1(c)(3) and 1.708-1(c)(4).
(h) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
panel and taxed upon the parties as the panel deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a Nonconsenting Limited
Partner, the panel may order all or a portion of the expenses
incurred by any Nonconsenting Limited Partner in connection with
the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of
experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the
interests entitled to an appraisal.
(i) From and after the effective date of the Merger, no
Nonconsenting Limited Partner who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in paragraph (b) hereof shall be entitled to
vote such Units for any purpose or to receive payment of
distributions on such interests (except distributions payable as
of a record date prior to the effective date of the Merger);
provided, however, that if such Nonconsenting Limited Partner
shall deliver to Aimco Properties, L.P.,
c/o Eagle
Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive,
Cranford, New Jersey, 07016, or by fax at
(908) 497-2349,
a written withdrawal of such Nonconsenting Limited
Partners demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the
Cash Consideration payable pursuant to the Merger Agreement,
either as provided in paragraph (c) hereof or thereafter
with the written approval of Aimco OP, then the right of such
Nonconsenting Limited Partner to an appraisal shall cease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding before
the panel shall be dismissed as to any Nonconsenting Limited
Partner without the approval of the panel, and such approval may
be conditioned upon such terms as the panel deems just.
B-2
ANNEX C
OFFICERS
AND DIRECTORS
USRP, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary do not have directors,
officers or significant employees of their own. The names and
positions of the executive officers and directors of Aimco,
AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I Corporation, the Corporate
General Partner of USRP, or U.S. Realty I, are set
forth below. The business address of each executive officer and
director is 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100,
Denver, Colorado 80237. Each executive officer and director is a
citizen of the United States of America.
|
|
|
Name (Age)
|
|
Position
|
|
Terry Considine(62)
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
of Aimco; Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of
AIMCO-GP.
|
Timothy Beaudin(51)
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and
U.S. Realty I.
|
Lisa R. Cohn(41)
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I.
|
Miles Cortez(66)
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of
Aimco and AIMCO-GP.
|
Ernest M. Freedman(39)
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Aimco,
AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I.
|
Steven D. Cordes(38)
|
|
Senior Vice President of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I;
Director of U.S. Realty I.
|
John Bezzant(47)
|
|
Senior Vice President of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I;
Director of U.S. Realty I.
|
Paul Beldin(36)
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Aimco,
AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I.
|
Stephen B. Waters(48)
|
|
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and
U.S. Realty I.
|
James N. Bailey(63)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
Richard S. Ellwood(78)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
Thomas L. Keltner(63)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
J. Landis Martin(64)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
Robert A. Miller(64)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
Michael A. Stein(56)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
Kathleen M. Nelson(64)
|
|
Director of Aimco
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Biographical Summary of Current Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Terry Considine
|
|
Mr. Considine has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of Aimco and AIMCO-GP, Inc. since July
1994. Mr. Considine also serves on the board of directors of
Intrepid Potash, Inc. a publicly held producer of potash, and,
until its acquisition in early 2009, Mr. Considine served as
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of American
Land Lease, Inc. Mr. Considine has over 40 years of
experience in the real estate and other industries. Among other
real estate ventures, in 1975, Mr. Considine founded and managed
the predecessor companies that became Aimco at its initial
public offering in 1994.
|
C-1
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Biographical Summary of Current Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy Beaudin
|
|
Mr. Beaudin was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer
of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I in February 2009. He
joined the companies as Executive Vice President and Chief
Development Officer in October 2005 and was appointed Executive
Vice President and Chief Property Operating Officer in October
2008. Mr. Beaudin oversees conventional and affordable
property operations, transactions, asset management, and
redevelopment and construction services. Prior to joining Aimco
and beginning in 1995, Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development
Corporation, a San Francisco, California-based real estate
investment trust. During his last five years at Catellus, Mr.
Beaudin served as Executive Vice President, with management
responsibility for development, construction and asset
management.
|
|
|
|
Lisa R. Cohn
|
|
Lisa R. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I in
December 2007. In addition to serving as general counsel, Ms.
Cohn has executive responsibility for insurance and risk
management as well as human resources. From January 2004 to
December 2007, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and
Assistant General Counsel. She joined Aimco in July 2002 as Vice
President and Assistant General Counsel. Prior to joining Aimco,
Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the law firm of Hogan
& Hartson LLP with a focus on public and private mergers
and acquisitions, venture capital financing, securities and
corporate governance.
|
|
|
|
Miles Cortez
|
|
Mr. Cortez was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief
Administrative Officer in December 2007. He is responsible for
administration, government relations, communications and special
projects. Mr. Cortez joined Aimco in August 2001 as
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior
to joining the Company, Mr. Cortez was the senior partner of
Cortez Macaulay Bernhardt & Schuetze LLC, a Denver,
Colorado law firm, from December 1997 through September 2001. He
served as president of the Colorado Bar Association from 1996 to
1997 and the Denver Bar Association from 1982 to 1983.
|
|
|
|
Ernest M. Freedman
|
|
Ernest M. Freedman was appointed Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I
effective November 1, 2009. Mr. Freedman joined Aimco in 2007 as
Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis and has
served as Senior Vice President of Finance since February 2009,
responsible for financial planning, tax, accounting and related
areas. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Freedman served as Chief
Financial Officer of HEI Hotels and Resorts. From 2000 to 2004,
Mr. Freedman was at GE Real Estate in a number of
capacities, including operations controller and finance manager
for investments and acquisitions. From 1993 to 2000, Mr.
Freedman was with Ernst & Young, LLP, including one year as
a senior manager in the real estate practice. Mr. Freedman is a
certified public accountant.
|
C-2
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Biographical Summary of Current Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Cordes
|
|
Steven D. Cordes was appointed as a Director of U.S. Realty
I effective March 2, 2009. Mr. Cordes has been a Senior Vice
President of Aimco, AIMCO-GP and U.S. Realty I since May 2007.
Mr. Cordes joined Aimco in 2001 as a Vice President of Capital
Markets with responsibility for Aimcos joint ventures and
equity capital markets activity. Prior to joining Aimco,
Mr. Cordes was a manager in the financial consulting
practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Effective March 2009, Mr.
Cordes was appointed to serve as the equivalent of the chief
executive officer of USRP.
|
|
|
|
John Bezzant
|
|
John Bezzant was appointed as a Director of U.S. Realty I
effective December 16, 2009. Mr. Bezzant has been a Senior
Vice President of U.S. Realty I and Aimco since joining Aimco in
June 2006. Prior to joining Aimco, from 2005 to
June 2006, Mr. Bezzant was a First Vice President at
Prologis, a Denver, Colorado-based real estate investment trust,
and from 1986 to 2005, Mr. Bezzant served as Vice
President, Asset Management at Catellus Development Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Paul Beldin
|
|
Paul Beldin joined Aimco in Macy 2008 and has served as Senior
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Aimco and U.S.
Realty I since that time. Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Beldin
served as controller and then as chief financial officer of
America First Apartment Investors, Inc., a publicly traded
multifamily real estate investment trust, from May 2005 to
September 2007 when the company was acquired by Sentinel Real
Estate Corporation. Prior to joining America First Apartment
Investors, Inc., Mr. Beldin was a senior manager at Deloitte and
Touche LLP, where he was employed from August 1996 to May 2005,
including two years as an audit manager in SEC services at
Deloittes national office.
|
|
|
|
Stephen B. Waters
|
|
Stephen B. Waters was appointed Senior Director of Partnership
Accounting of Aimco and U.S. Realty I in June 2009. Mr. Waters
has responsibility for partnership accounting with Aimco and
serves as the principal financial officer of U.S. Realty I. Mr.
Waters joined Aimco as a Director of Real Estate Accounting in
September 1999 and was appointed Vice President of U.S. Realty I
and Aimco in April 2004. Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Waters was
a senior manager at Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
|
|
James N. Bailey
|
|
Mr. Bailey was first elected as a director of Aimco in June 2000
and is currently Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Compensation
and Human Resources Committees. Mr. Bailey co-founded Cambridge
Associates, LLC, an investment consulting firm, in 1973 and
currently serves as its Senior Managing Director and Treasurer.
He is also a co-founder, director and treasurer of The Plymouth
Rock Company, and a director of SRB Corporation, Inc. and
Homeowners Direct Company, all three of which are insurance
companies and insurance company affiliates. He also serves as an
Overseer for the New England Aquarium, and is on its audit
and investment committees. Mr. Bailey is a member of the
Massachusetts Bar and the American Bar Associations. Mr. Bailey,
a long-time entrepreneur, brings particular expertise to the
board in the areas of investment and financial planning, capital
markets, evaluation of institutional real estate markets and
managers of all property types.
|
C-3
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Biographical Summary of Current Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Richard S. Ellwood
|
|
Mr. Ellwood was first elected as a director of Aimco in July
1994. Mr. Ellwood is currently a member of the Audit,
Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committees. Mr. Ellwood was the founder and President
of R.S. Ellwood & Co., Incorporated, which he operated as a
real estate investment banking firm through 2004. Prior to
forming his firm, Mr. Ellwood had 31 years experience on
Wall Street as an investment banker, serving as: Managing
Director and senior banker at Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from
1984 to 1987; Managing Director at Warburg Paribas Becker from
1978 to 1984; general partner and then Senior Vice President and
a director at White, Weld & Co. from 1968 to 1978; and in
various capacities at J.P. Morgan & Co. from 1955 to
1968. Mr. Ellwood served as a director of Felcor Lodging Trust,
Incorporated, a publicly held company, from 1994 to 2009. He is
as a trustee of the Diocesan Investment Trust of the Episcopal
Diocese of New Jersey and is chairman of the diocesan audit
committee. As one of the first real estate investment bankers,
Mr. Ellwood brings particular expertise in real estate finance
through corporate securities in both public and private markets
as well as in direct property financings through mortgage
placements, limited partnerships and joint ventures.
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Keltner
|
|
Mr. Keltner was first elected as a director of Aimco in April
2007 and is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and
Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees. Mr. Keltner served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer Americas and Global Brands
for Hilton Hotels Corporation from March 2007 through March
2008, which concluded the transition period following
Hiltons acquisition by The Blackstone Group. Mr. Keltner
joined Hilton Hotels Corporation in 1999 and served in various
roles. Mr. Keltner has more than 20 years of experience in
the areas of hotel development, acquisition, disposition,
franchising and management. Prior to joining Hilton Hotels
Corporation, from 1993 to 1999, Mr. Keltner served in several
positions with Promus Hotel Corporation, including President,
Brand Performance and Development. Before joining Promus Hotel
Corporation, he served in various capacities with Holiday Inn
Worldwide, Holiday Inns International and Holiday Inns, Inc. In
addition, Mr. Keltner was President of Saudi Marriott Company, a
division of Marriott Corporation, and was a management
consultant with Cresap, McCormick and Paget, Inc. Mr. Keltner
brings particular expertise to the board in the areas of
property operations, marketing, branding, development and
customer service.
|
C-4
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Biographical Summary of Current Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
J. Landis Martin
|
|
Mr. Martin was first elected as a director of Aimco in July 1994
and is currently Chairman of the Compensation and Human
Resources Committee. Mr. Martin is also a member of the
Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and
serves as the Lead Independent Director of Aimcos Board.
Mr. Martin is the Founder and Managing Director of Platte
River Ventures LLC, a private equity firm. In November 2005, Mr.
Martin retired as Chairman and CEO of Titanium Metals
Corporation, a publicly held integrated producer of titanium
metals, where he served since January 1994. Mr. Martin served as
President and CEO of NL Industries, Inc., a publicly held
manufacturer of titanium dioxide chemicals, from 1987 to 2003.
Mr. Martin is also a director of Crown Castle International
Corporation, a publicly held wireless communications company,
Halliburton Company, a publicly held provider of products and
services to the energy industry, and Intrepid Potash, Inc., a
publicly held producer of potash. As a former chief executive of
four NYSE-listed companies, Mr. Martin brings particular
expertise to the board in the areas of operations, finance and
governance.
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Miller
|
|
Mr. Miller was first elected as a director of Aimco in April
2007 and is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and
Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees. Mr. Miller has served as the President of Marriott
Leisure since 1997. Prior to joining Marriott Leisure, from 1984
to 1988, Mr. Miller served as Executive Vice President
& General Manager of Marriott Vacation Club International
and then as its President from 1988 to 1997. In 1984, Mr. Miller
and a partner sold their company, American Resorts, Inc., to
Marriott. Mr. Miller co-founded American Resorts, Inc. in
1978, and it was the first business model to encompass all
aspects of timeshare resort development, sales, management and
operations. Prior to founding American Resorts, Inc., from 1972
to 1978, Mr. Miller was Chief Financial Officer of
Fleetwing Corporation, a regional retail and wholesale petroleum
company. Prior to joining Fleetwing, Mr. Miller served for five
years as a staff accountant for Arthur Young & Company. Mr.
Miller is past Chairman and currently a director of the American
Resort Development Association (ARDA) and currently
serves as Chairman and director of the ARDA International
Foundation. As a successful real estate entrepreneur, Mr. Miller
brings particular expertise to the board in the areas of
operations, management, marketing, sales, and development, as
well as finance and accounting.
|
C-5
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Biographical Summary of Current Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Stein
|
|
Mr. Stein was first elected as a director of Aimco in October
2004 and is currently the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr.
Stein is also a member of the Compensation and Human Resources
and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. From
January 2001 until its acquisition by Eli Lilly in January
2007, Mr. Stein served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of ICOS Corporation, a biotechnology company
based in Bothell, Washington. From October 1998 to September
2000, Mr. Stein was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Nordstrom, Inc. From 1989 to September 1998, Mr.
Stein served in various capacities with Marriott International,
Inc., including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Stein serves on the Board of
Directors of Nautilus, Inc., which is a publicly held fitness
company, and the Board of Directors of Providence Health &
Services, a not-for-profit health system operating hospitals and
other health care facilities across Alaska, Washington, Montana,
Oregon and California. As the former chief financial officer of
two NYSE-listed companies and a former partner at Arthur
Andersen, Mr. Stein brings particular expertise to the board in
the areas of corporate and real estate finance, and accounting
and auditing for large and complex business operations.
|
|
|
|
Kathleen M. Nelson
|
|
Ms. Nelson was first elected as a director of Aimco in April
2010, and currently serves on the Audit, Compensation and Human
Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
Ms. Nelson has an extensive background in commercial real estate
and financial services with over 40 years of experience
including 36 years at TIAA-CREF. She held the position of
Managing Director/Group Leader and Chief Administrative Officer
for TIAA-CREFs mortgage and real estate division. Ms.
Nelson developed and staffed TIAAs real estate research
department. She retired from this position in December 2004 and
founded and serves as president of KMN Associates LLC, a
commercial real estate investment advisory and consulting firm.
In 2009, Ms. Nelson co-founded and serves as Managing Principal
of Bay Hollow Associates, LLC, a commercial real estate
consulting firm, which provides counsel to institutional
investors. Ms. Nelson served as the International Council of
Shopping Centers chairman for the 2003-04 term and has
been an ICSC Trustee since 1991. She also is the chairman of the
ICSC Audit Committee and is a member of various other
committees. Ms. Nelson serves on the Board of Directors of CBL
& Associates Properties, Inc., which is a publicly held
REIT that develops and manages retail shopping properties. She
is a member of Castagna Realty Company Advisory Board and has
served as an advisor to the Rand Institute Center for Terrorism
Risk Management Policy and on the board of the Greater Jamaica
Development Corporation. Ms. Nelson serves on the Advisory Board
of the Beverly Willis Architectural Foundation and is a member
of the Anglo American Real Property Institute. Ms. Nelson brings
to the board particular expertise in the areas of real estate
finance and investment.
|
C-6
ANNEX D
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-15656
U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
57-0814502
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(864) 239-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by
reference to the price at which the partnership interests were
last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such
partnership interests as of the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the
Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be
determined.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
D-1
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a
safe harbor for forward-looking statements in
certain circumstances. Certain information included in this
Annual Report contains or may contain information that is
forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities
laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding the
effect of redevelopments, the Partnerships future
financial performance, including the Partnerships ability
to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels,
and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may
differ materially from those described in these forward-looking
statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors some of which are beyond the
Partnerships control including, without limitation:
financing risks, including the availability and cost of
financing and the risk that the Partnerships cash flows
from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of
principal and interest; natural disasters and severe weather
such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the
general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of
governmental regulations that affect the Partnerships
property and interpretations of those regulations; the
competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; real
estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and
the general economic climate in local markets and competition
for residents in such markets; insurance risk, including the
cost of insurance; development risks; litigation, including
costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any
adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities,
including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to
necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently
owned or previously owned by the Partnership. Readers should
carefully review the Partnerships financial statements and
the notes thereto, as well as the other documents the
Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
PART I
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership (the
Partnership or Registrant) was organized
as a limited partnership under the laws of Delaware on
January 23, 1986. The general partner responsible for
management of the Partnerships business is
U.S. Realty I Corporation, a South Carolina corporation
(the Corporate General Partner). The Corporate
General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and
Management Company (AIMCO), a publicly traded real
estate investment trust. The other general partner is AIMCO
Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner
and AIMCO. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the term of
the Partnership is scheduled to expire on December 31,
2021, unless terminated prior to such date.
The Partnership is engaged in the business of operating and
holding real estate property for investment. The Partnership
commenced operations on August 26, 1986, and acquired its
first property, a newly constructed apartment property, on
August 28, 1986. Prior to September 5, 1986, it
acquired an existing apartment property, a newly constructed
shopping center and an existing shopping center. The Partnership
continues to own and operate one of these properties. The
shopping centers were sold on February 1, 1999 and
July 2, 1999. One of the apartment properties was sold on
December 20, 2006.
Commencing on August 26, 1986, the Partnership delivered
1,222,000 Depositary Unit Certificates, representing assignments
of limited partnership interests (DUCs), to Wheat
First Securities, Inc. and received $30,550,000 ($25.00 per DUC)
in proceeds. The DUCs were offered by several underwriters in
minimum investment amounts of 100 DUCs ($25.00 per DUC). Since
its initial offering, the Partnership has not received, nor are
its limited partners required to make any additional
contributions. The Partnership also received $16,369,000 as
proceeds from a contemporaneous private bond offering. The
Partnership used substantially all of the proceeds from these
offerings to acquire its initial four operating properties.
On April 1, 1993, the Partnership filed for protection
under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. The filing
was made due to the Partnerships inability to repay its
secured debt due to an insurance company. On April 23,
1993, the Partnership filed a Reorganization Plan (the
Plan) with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of South Carolina. The significant provision of the
Plan was the refinancing of the secured debt. On July 23,
1993, the Court entered an order confirming the
Partnerships Plan. On January 27, 1994, the Court
closed the case.
D-2
The Partnership has no employees. Management and administrative
services are provided by the Corporate General Partner and by
agents retained by the Corporate General Partner. These services
were provided by affiliates of the Corporate General Partner for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
A further description of the Partnerships business is
included in Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in this
Form 10-K.
The following table sets forth the Partnerships investment
in property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Type of Ownership
|
|
Use
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
Palm Harbor, Florida
|
|
08/28/86
|
|
Fee ownership subject to first, second and third mortgages
|
|
Apartment 262 units
|
Schedule
of
Property:
Set forth below for the Partnerships property is the gross
carrying value, accumulated depreciation, depreciable life,
method of depreciation and federal tax basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Depreciable
|
|
Method of
|
|
Federal
|
|
Property
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Life
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
Tax Basis
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
$
|
15,629
|
|
|
$
|
8,542
|
|
|
5-35 yrs
|
|
S/L
|
|
$
|
4,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data for a description of the Partnerships
capitalization and depreciation policies.
Schedule
of Property Indebtedness:
The following table sets forth certain information relating to
the fixed rate loans encumbering the Partnerships property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Balance At
|
|
|
Stated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Due At
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Maturity(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
mortgage
|
|
$
|
6,121
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
|
|
120 months
|
|
|
|
12/01/2015
|
|
|
$
|
5,685
|
|
2nd
mortgage
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
120 months
|
|
|
|
12/01/2015
|
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
3rd
mortgage
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
|
|
98 months
|
|
|
|
12/01/2015
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data for information with respect to other details about
the loans. |
Schedule
of Rental Rates and
Occupancy:
Average annual rental rate and occupancy for 2009 and 2008 for
the property are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Rental Rate
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
(per unit)
|
|
Occupancy
|
Property
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
$
|
8,819
|
|
|
$
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
D-3
The real estate industry is highly competitive. The property is
subject to competition from other residential apartment
complexes in the area. The Corporate General Partner believes
that the property is adequately insured. The property is an
apartment complex which leases units for lease terms of one year
or less. No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the
available rental space. The property is in good condition
subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical
for assets of this type and age.
Schedule
of Real Estate Taxes and
Rate:
Real estate taxes and rate in 2009 for the property were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Billing
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
Capital
Improvements:
Twin
Lakes Apartments
The Partnership completed approximately $271,000 in capital
expenditures at Twin Lake Apartments during the year ended
December 31, 2009, consisting primarily of floor covering
replacements, water and sewer improvements and building
improvements. These improvements were funded from operating cash
flow and advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of
the Corporate General Partner. The Partnership regularly
evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While
the Partnership has no material commitments for property
improvements and replacements, certain routine capital
expenditures are anticipated during 2010. Such capital
expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the
property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the
property.
Additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is
available from operations, Partnership reserves or advances from
AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not
obligated to provide such advances. To the extent that capital
improvements are completed, the Partnerships distributable
cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the
short term.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP
Management Company, both affiliates of the Corporate General
Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective
action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated
the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to
pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of
40 hours per week (overtime claims). The
plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP
Management Company (the Defendants) failed to
compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required
to be on-call (on-call claims). In March
2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the
collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs counsel filed
individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions. In the
second quarter of 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the
overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a
framework for resolving the 88 remaining on-call
claims and the attorneys fees claimed by plaintiffs
counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal
courts have been dismissed. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
the Partnership paid approximately $12,000 for settlement
amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked
at the Partnerships investment property. At this time, the
88 remaining on-call claims and the attorneys
fees claimed by plaintiffs counsel are not resolved. The
parties have selected six on-call claims that will
proceed forward through the arbitration process and have
selected arbitrators. After those arbitrations have been
completed, the parties will revisit settling the on-call claims.
The first two arbitrations took place in December 2009 and the
Defendants received a defense verdict against the first two
claimants, and plaintiffs dismissed the claims of the next two
claimants. The remaining two arbitrations will take place in
April 2010. The Corporate General Partner is uncertain as to the
amount of any additional loss that may be allocable to the
Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot estimate whether
any additional loss will occur or a potential range of loss.
D-4
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Security Holder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
The Partnership, a publicly-held limited partnership received
$30,550,000 upon delivery of 1,222,000 Depositary Units
Certificates (DUCs) which represent assignment of
limited partnership interests to the holders. As of
December 31, 2009, the number of DUCs holders of record was
603 and there were 1,222,000 units outstanding. Transfer of
DUCs is subject to certain suitability and other requirements.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner own 900,195 DUCs or
73.67% at December 31, 2009. No public trading market has
developed for the DUCs and it is not anticipated that such a
market will develop in the future.
There were no distributions to the partners during the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Future cash distributions will depend on the level of net cash
generated from operations and the timing of debt maturities,
refinancings,
and/or
property sale. The Partnerships cash available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the
amounts accrued and payable to affiliates at December 31,
2009, it is unlikely that the Partnership will generate
sufficient funds from operations after required capital
expenditures and repayment of amounts accrued and payable to
affiliates to permit further distributions to its partners
during 2010 or subsequent periods. See Item 2.
Property Capital Improvements for information
relating to anticipated capital expenditures at the property.
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner
interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned
900,195 DUCs in the Partnership representing 73.67% of the
outstanding DUCs at December 31, 2009. A number of these
DUCs were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or
its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will
acquire additional DUCs in exchange for cash or a combination of
cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating
partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender
offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, DUC holders
holding a majority of the DUCs are entitled to take action with
respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not
limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership
Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As
a result of its ownership of 73.67% of the outstanding DUCs,
AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting
decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the
Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited
partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also
owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a
result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as
corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate
General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This item should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.
The Partnerships financial results depend upon a number of
factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at
the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs
incurred to operate the investment property, general economic
conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of
the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner monitors the
rental market environment of its investment property to assess
the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing
occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases
in expenses. As part of this plan, the Corporate General Partner
attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of
inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and
maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the
Corporate General Partner may use rental concessions and rental
rate reductions to offset softening market conditions,
accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Corporate General
Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number
of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such
as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or
positively affect the Partnerships financial results.
D-5
Results
of Operations
The Partnerships net loss was approximately $546,000 and
$553,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The decrease in net loss is due to a decrease in
total expenses, partially offset by a decrease in total revenues.
Total revenues decreased as a decrease in rental income was
partially offset by an increase in other income. Rental income
decreased due to a decrease in average rental rates at Twin Lake
Apartments. Other income increased due to increases in utility
reimbursements, ancillary services, administrative fees and pet
damage fees at Twin Lake Apartments.
Total expenses decreased due to decreases in operating, general
and administrative and property tax expenses, partially offset
by increases in depreciation and interest expenses. Operating
expense decreased due to decreases in print advertising, payroll
and benefit related expenses, utility and washer/dryer expenses.
In addition, repair costs were incurred in 2008 for water damage
from leaking pipes at Twin Lakes Apartments. Property tax
expense decreased due to a decrease in the assessed value of
Twin Lake Apartments. Depreciation expense increased due to
capital improvements and replacements placed into service during
the past year. Interest expense increased due to an increase in
interest on advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate
of the Corporate General Partner, due to additional advances in
2009, partially offset by a decrease in interest on the
mortgages encumbering the Partnerships investment property
due to scheduled principal payments.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Twin Lakes
Apartments suffered water damage as a result of several
occurances of water pipe breaks in several of the
Partnerships apartment units. As of December 31,
2008, the Partnership had incurred, in total, approximately
$79,000 in capitalizable costs and approximately $17,000 in
clean up costs to repair the water damages incurred during the
year. The Partnership did not receive any insurance proceeds as
the damages for the various individual claims did not exceed the
Partnerships insurance deductible. The Partnership
recognized a casualty loss, which is included in operating
expenses, of approximately $16,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2008 as a result of the write off of
approximately $16,000 of undepreciated property improvements and
replacements.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Twin Lakes
Apartments suffered water damage as a result of a water pipe
break in additional apartment units. The Partnership incurred
approximately $32,000 in capitalizable costs related to this
damage. The Partnership received insurance proceeds of
approximately $27,000 for damages which includes approximately
$5,000 for lost rental income. The Partnership recognized a
casualty gain of approximately $16,000, which is included in
operating expenses, during the year ended December 31, 2008
as a result of the write off of approximately $6,000 of
undepreciated property improvements and replacements.
General and administrative expense decreased due to a reduction
in management reimbursements as a result of a decrease in costs
incurred by the Corporate General Partner included in the
reimbursements charged to the Partnership. Included in general
and administrative expense for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008 are management reimbursements to the Corporate
General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also
included in general and administrative expense are costs
associated with the quarterly and annual communications with
investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required
by the Partnership Agreement.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2009, the Partnership had cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $101,000 compared to approximately
$44,000 at December 31, 2008. Cash and cash equivalents
increased by approximately $57,000 from December 31, 2008
due to approximately $190,000 and $99,000 of cash provided by
operating and financing activities, respectively, partially
offset by approximately $232,000 of cash used in investing
activities. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of
advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the
Corporate General Partner, partially offset by repayment of
advances and payments on the mortgages encumbering the
investment property. Cash used in investing activities consisted
of property improvements and replacements, partially offset by
net withdrawals from restricted escrow.
The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future
liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly
related to the level of capital expenditures required at the
investment property to adequately maintain the physical
D-6
assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to
comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory
requirements. The Corporate General Partner monitors
developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. The
Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of
the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments
for property improvements and replacements, certain routine
capital expenditures are anticipated during 2010. Such capital
expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the
property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the
property. Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is
available from operations or from Partnership reserves. To the
extent that capital improvements are completed, the
Partnerships distributable cash flow from operations may
be adversely affected at least in the short term.
The Partnerships assets are thought to be sufficient for
any near term needs (exclusive of capital improvements and
repayment of amounts accrued and payable to affiliates) of the
Partnership. At December 31, 2009, the first, second and
third mortgage indebtedness on Twin Lakes Apartments of
approximately $6,121,000, $3,406,000 and $1,077,000,
respectively, require monthly payments of principal and interest
of approximately $74,000 until December 1, 2015 when
balloon payments of approximately $5,685,000, $3,025,000 and
$963,000, respectively, are due. The Partnership has the option
of extending the maturity date on both the first and second
mortgages for one additional year, to December 1, 2016.
With respect to the third mortgage, the maturity date will
automatically be extended for one year, to December 1,
2016, if no event of default exists at its original maturity
date of December 1, 2015.
There were no distributions to the partners during the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Future cash distributions
will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations
and the timing of debt maturities, refinancings
and/or
property sale. The Partnerships cash available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the
amounts accrued and payable to affiliates at December 31,
2009, it is unlikely that the Partnership will generate
sufficient funds from operations, after capital improvement
expenditures and repayment of amounts accrued and payable to
affiliates, to permit additional distributions to its partners
during 2010 or subsequent periods.
The Partnership Agreement provides for partners to receive
distributions from the net proceeds of the sales of properties,
the net proceeds from refinancings and net cash from operations
as those terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement. The
Partnership Agreement requires that the limited partners be
furnished with a statement of Net Cash from Operations as such
term is defined in the Partnership Agreement. Net Cash from
Operations should not be considered an alternative to net (loss)
income as an indicator of the Partnerships operating
performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Below is
a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities as
disclosed in the statements of cash flows, included in
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data, to Net Cash from Operations as defined in the
Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
Payments on mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Advances from affiliates
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Payments on advances from affiliates
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Property improvements and replacements
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
Change in restricted escrows, net
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Changes in reserves for net operating liabilities
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operations (as defined in the
Partnership Agreement)
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions made from reserves no longer considered necessary
by the Corporate General Partner are considered to be additional
net cash from operations for allocation purposes.
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner
interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned
900,195 DUCs in the Partnership representing 73.67% of the
outstanding DUCs at December 31, 2009. A number of these
DUCs were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or
its affiliates. It is possible that
D-7
AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional DUCs in exchange
for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties,
L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private
purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership
Agreement, DUC holders holding a majority of the DUCs are
entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters
that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain
amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the
Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of
73.67% of the outstanding DUCs, AIMCO and its affiliates are in
a position to control all voting decisions with respect to the
Partnership. Although the Corporate General Partner owes
fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the
Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as
its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Corporate
General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the
Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with
the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole
stockholder.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
A summary of the Partnerships significant accounting
policies is included in Note A
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies which is included in the financial statements in
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data. The Corporate General Partner believes that the
consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership
to provide readers of the financial statements with useful and
reliable information about the Partnerships operating
results and financial condition. The financial statements are
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States which requires the Partnership to
make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and
assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the
Partnerships accounting policies in many areas. The
Partnership believes that of its significant accounting
policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment
and complexity.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Asset
INVESTMENT PROPERTY IS RECORDED AT COST, LESS ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION, UNLESS THE CARRYING AMOUNT OF THE ASSET IS NOT
RECOVERABLE. IF EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES INDICATE THAT THE
CARRYING AMOUNT OF THE PROPERTY MAY NOT BE RECOVERABLE, THE
PARTNERSHIP WILL MAKE AN ASSESSMENT OF ITS RECOVERABILITY BY
COMPARING THE CARRYING AMOUNT TO THE PARTNERSHIPS ESTIMATE
OF THE UNDISCOUNTED FUTURE CASH FLOWS, EXCLUDING INTEREST
CHARGES, OF THE PROPERTY. IF THE CARRYING AMOUNT EXCEEDS THE
ESTIMATED AGGREGATE UNDISCOUNTED FUTURE CASH FLOWS, THE
PARTNERSHIP WOULD RECOGNIZE AN IMPAIRMENT LOSS TO THE EXTENT THE
CARRYING AMOUNT EXCEEDS THE ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF THE
PROPERTY.
Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.
Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance
and value of the Partnerships investment property. These
factors include, but are not limited to, general economic
climate; competition from other apartment communities and other
housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an
increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect
apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental
regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in
operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation
and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents;
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of
rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing;
and changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.
Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an
impairment of the Partnerships asset.
Revenue
Recognition
The Partnership generally leases apartment units for
twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental
concessions during particularly slow months or in response to
heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents
and establishes an allowance, after the application of security
deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
D-8
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
LIST OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D-10
|
|
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
|
|
|
D-12
|
|
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
|
|
|
D-15
|
|
D-9
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners
U. S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of
operations, changes in partners deficit, and cash flows
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Partnerships internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit
also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Greenville, South Carolina
March 29, 2010
D-10
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Receivables and deposits
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Restricted escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Investment property (Notes B and E):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Buildings and related personal property
|
|
|
13,929
|
|
|
|
13,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,629
|
|
|
|
15,358
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(8,542
|
)
|
|
|
(7,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
|
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,561
|
|
|
$
|
8,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS DEFICIT
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
Tenant security deposit liabilities
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Due to affiliates (Note D)
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
Mortgage notes payable (Note B)
|
|
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
10,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
12,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Depositary unit certificate holders (2,440,000 units
authorized; 1,222,000 units issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
(5,050
|
)
|
|
|
(4,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,064
|
)
|
|
|
(4,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,561
|
|
|
$
|
8,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
D-11
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
2,145
|
|
|
$
|
2,260
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
|
|
3,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(546
|
)
|
|
$
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to general partners (1%)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Net loss allocated to depositary unit certificate holders (99%)
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(546
|
)
|
|
$
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per depository unit certificate
|
|
$
|
(.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
D-12
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Certificate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Holders
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
Original capital contributions
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
30,550
|
|
|
$
|
30,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners deficit at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,962
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,965
|
)
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners deficit at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(4,509
|
)
|
|
|
(4,518
|
)
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners deficit at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
D-13
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(546
|
)
|
|
$
|
(553
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables and deposits
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Tenant security deposit liabilities
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property improvements and replacements
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
Net withdrawals from restricted escrows
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Insurance proceeds received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Advances from affiliates
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Repayment of advances from affiliates
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
913
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property improvements and replacements in accounts payable
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, approximately $245,000 of property
improvements and replacements were included in accounts payable
and are included in property improvements and replacements for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
D-14
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
December 31,
2009
|
|
Note A
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization: U.S. Realty Partners
Limited Partnership (the Partnership or
Registrant) was organized as a limited partnership
under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 23,
1986. The general partner responsible for management of the
Partnerships business is U.S. Realty I Corporation, a
South Carolina Corporation (the Corporate General
Partner). The Corporate General Partner is a subsidiary of
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIMCO),
a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The other
general partner is AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the
Corporate General Partner and AIMCO. The Partnership commenced
operations on August 26, 1986, and completed its
acquisition of two apartment complexes and two commercial
properties on September 4, 1986. The Partnership continues
to operate one apartment property located in Florida. The
commercial properties were sold on February 1, 1999 and
July 2, 1999. One of the apartment properties was sold on
December 20, 2006. The Partnership Agreement provides that
the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2021,
unless terminated prior to such date.
The Depositary Unit Certificate (DUC) holders are
assignees of USS Assignor, Inc. (the Limited
Partner), an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner,
and as such will be entitled to receive the economic rights
attributable to the Limited Partnership Interests represented by
their DUCs. DUC holders will for all practical purposes be
treated as limited partners of the Partnership.
Subsequent Events: The
Partnerships management evaluated subsequent events
through the time this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
was filed.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Allocation of Cash
Distributions: Operating cash distributions
by the Partnership are allocated 98% to the DUC holders and 2%
to the general partners until the DUC holders have received
annual noncumulative distributions equal to 10% of their
Adjusted Capital Values. Net cash from operations then will be
distributed to the general partners until the general partners
collectively have received 7% of net cash from operations
distributed in that fiscal year. Thereafter, (after repayment of
any loans by the general partners to the Partnership), net cash
from operations will be distributed 93% to the DUC holders and
7% to the general partners. Cash distributions of sale or
refinancing proceeds are first distributed to the DUC holders
until the DUC holders have received an amount equal to their
Adjusted Capital contributions and second until the DUC holders
have received cumulative distributions equal to 10% of their
Adjusted Capital Values. Thereafter, (after repayment of any
loans by the general partners to the Partnership) any remaining
proceeds will be distributed 93% to the DUC holders and 7% to
the general partners.
Allocation of Profits, Gains and
Losses: Profits, gains and losses of the
Partnership are allocated between the general partners and DUC
holders in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership
Agreement.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement: In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162, or SFAS No. 168, which is effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. Upon the effective date of
SFAS No. 168, the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification, or the FASB ASC, became the single source of
authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, under authority of
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP
for SEC registrants. The FASB ASC superseded all then-existing
non-SEC accounting and reporting standards, and all other
non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in
the FASB ASC is now non-authoritative. Subsequent to the
effective date of SFAS No. 168, the FASB will issue
Accounting Standards Updates that serve to update the FASB ASC.
D-15
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investment Property: Investment
property consists of one apartment complex and is stated at
cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount
of the asset is not recoverable. The Partnership capitalizes
costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure
activities, including redevelopment and construction projects,
other tangible property improvements and replacements of
existing property components. Costs including interest, property
taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and
construction projects are capitalized during periods in which
redevelopment and construction projects are in progress. Costs
incurred in connection with capital projects are capitalized
where the costs of the project exceed $250. Included in these
capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent
by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and
control of all capital expenditure activities at the property
level. The Partnership did not capitalize any material costs
related to interest, property taxes or operating costs during
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Capitalized
costs are depreciated over the useful life of the asset.
Expenditures for ordinary repairs, maintenance and apartment
turnover costs are expensed as incurred.
If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make
an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying
amount to the Partnerships estimate of the undiscounted
future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.
If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate
undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize
an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property. No adjustments for
impairment of value were necessary for the years ending
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments: FASB ASC Topic 825,
Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair
value information about financial instruments, whether or not
recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to
estimate fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount at
which the instruments could be exchanged in a current
transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or
liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying
amount of its financial instruments (except for long-term debt)
approximates their fair value due to the short term maturity of
these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of
its long-term debt by discounting future cash flows using a
discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be
available to the Partnership for similar term long-term debt. At
December 31, 2009, the fair value of the Partnerships
long-term debt at the Partnerships incremental borrowing
rate is approximately $11,295,000.
Depreciation: Depreciation is provided
by the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the
rental property and related personal property. For Federal
income tax purposes, the modified accelerated cost recovery
method is used for depreciation of 1) real property
additions over
271/2 years,
and 2) personal property additions over 5 years.
Deferred Costs: Loan costs of
approximately $346,000 at both December 31, 2009 and 2008,
less accumulated amortization of approximately $130,000 and
$94,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are
included in other assets. The loan costs are amortized over the
terms of the related loan agreements. Amortization expense for
2009 and 2008 was approximately $36,000 and is included in
interest expense. Amortization expense is expected to be
approximately $36,000 for the years 2010 through 2014.
Leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in
connection with successful leasing efforts are deferred and
amortized over the terms of the related leases. Amortization of
these costs is included in operating expenses.
Leases: The Partnership generally
leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly
slow months or in response to heavy competition from other
similar complexes in the area. Rental income attributable to
leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluates all
accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance,
after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater
than 30 days past due on current tenants and all
receivables due from former tenants.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and
cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. At certain
times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the
limit on insured deposits. Cash balances include
D-16
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
approximately $47,000 and zero at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively, that are maintained by an affiliated
management company on behalf of affiliated entities in cash
concentration accounts.
Restricted Escrow: In connection with
the second mortgage obtained on Twin Lakes Apartments in
December 2005 and the third mortgage obtained during September
2007, the lenders required the establishment of a replacement
reserve to be used for the funding of capital replacements
throughout the loan terms. At December 31, 2008 the total
reserve balance was approximately $106,000. The lender is not
currently requiring the Partnership to fund the escrow account
and has released the funds held at December 31, 2008.
Tenant Security Deposits: The
Partnership requires security deposits from all apartment
lessees for the duration of the lease and such deposits are
included in receivables and deposits. The security deposits are
refunded when the tenant vacates provided the tenant has not
damaged the apartment and is current on rental payments.
Segment Reporting: FASB ASC Topic
280-10,
Segment Reporting, established standards for the way
that public business enterprises report information about
operating segments in annual financial statements and requires
that those enterprises report selected information about
operating segments in interim financial reports. FASB ASC Topic
280-10 also
established standards for related disclosures about products and
services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in
FASB ASC Topic
280-10, the
Partnership has only one reportable segment.
Advertising: The Partnership expenses
the costs of advertising as incurred. Advertising expense,
included in operating expense, was approximately $36,000 and
$59,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
|
|
Note B
|
Mortgage
Notes Payable
|
The terms of the mortgage notes payable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Balance At
|
|
|
Payment
|
|
|
Stated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Including
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Due At
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
mortgage
|
|
$
|
6,121
|
|
|
$
|
6,175
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
|
|
12/01/2015
|
|
|
$
|
5,685
|
|
2nd
mortgage
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
12/01/2015
|
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
3rd
mortgage
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
|
|
12/01/2015
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,604
|
|
|
$
|
10,727
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The mortgage notes payable are fixed rate mortgages that are
non-recourse and are secured by a pledge of the
Partnerships rental property and by a pledge of revenues
from the respective rental property. The investment property may
not be sold subject to the existing indebtedness.
The first and second mortgage loans are guaranteed by an
affiliate of the Corporate General Partner. With respect to the
first and second mortgage loans, the Partnership has the option
of extending the maturity date for one additional year, to
December 1, 2016, during which period the mortgages would
both bear interest at a rate equal to the British Bankers
Associations one month LIBOR rate plus 250 basis
points and would require monthly payments of principal and
interest. With respect to the third mortgage loan, if no event
of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will
automatically be extended for one additional year, to
December 1, 2016, during which period the third mortgage
would bear interest at the one-month LIBOR rate plus
250 basis points and would require monthly payments of
principal and interest.
D-17
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage notes payable
subsequent to December 31, 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
2011
|
|
|
142
|
|
2012
|
|
|
150
|
|
2013
|
|
|
162
|
|
2014
|
|
|
174
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
9,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership is classified as a partnership for Federal
income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes
is made in the financial statements of the Partnership. Taxable
income or loss of the Partnership is reported in the income tax
returns of its partners.
The following is a reconciliation of reported net loss and
Federal taxable loss (in thousands except per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net loss as reported
|
|
$
|
(546
|
)
|
|
$
|
(553
|
)
|
Add (deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation differences
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Change in prepaid rentals
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal taxable loss
|
|
$
|
(271
|
)
|
|
$
|
(469
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal taxable loss per DUC
|
|
$
|
(.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2009 and 2008, allocation under Internal Revenue Code
Section 704(b) results in the limited partners being
allocated a non-pro rata amount of taxable loss.
The following is a reconciliation between the Partnerships
reported amounts and Federal tax basis of net liabilities at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net liabilites as reported
|
|
$
|
(5,064
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,518
|
)
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(3,539
|
)
|
|
|
(3,764
|
)
|
Syndication
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
Other
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities tax basis
|
|
$
|
(4,845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note D
|
Transactions
with Affiliated Parties
|
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate
General Partner and its affiliates for the management and
administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership
Agreement provides for (i) certain
D-18
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
payments to affiliates for services and (ii) reimbursement
of certain expenses incurred by affiliates of the Corporate
General Partner on behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner receive 5% of gross
receipts from the Partnerships property as compensation
for providing property management services. The Partnership paid
to such affiliates approximately $123,000 and $126,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which
is included in operating expenses.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged the
Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses
amounting to approximately $85,000 and $206,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is
included in general and administrative expenses and investment
property. The portion of these reimbursements included in
investment property for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 are charges for construction management services
provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of
approximately $57,000 and $158,000, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 approximately $53,000 of reimbursements
were owed and are included in due to affiliates. No amounts were
owed at December 31, 2009.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, AIMCO
Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner
advanced the Partnership approximately $365,000 and $1,222,000
to fund capital improvements and real estate taxes at Twin Lake
Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the
Partnership repaid AIMCO Properties, L.P. approximately $285,000
which included approximately $142,000 of accrued interest. No
such payments were made during the year ended December 31,
2008. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, interest was
charged at prime plus 2% (5.25% at December 31, 2009).
Interest expense was approximately $91,000 and $58,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the total outstanding advances
and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. was
approximately $1,764,000 and $1,593,000, respectively, and was
included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive
additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P.
although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such
advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P.,
including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits
through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally
self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to
workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and
vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above
the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO
from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates
approximately $77,000 and $57,000, respectively, for insurance
coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner
interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned
900,195 DUCs in the Partnership representing 73.67% of the
outstanding DUCs at December 31, 2009. A number of these
DUCs were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or
its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will
acquire additional DUCs in exchange for cash or a combination of
cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating
partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender
offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, DUC holders
holding a majority of the DUCs are entitled to take action with
respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not
limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership
Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As
a result of its ownership of 73.67% of the outstanding DUCs,
AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting
decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the
Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited
partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also
owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a
result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as
corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate
General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.
D-19
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note E
|
Investment
Property and Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Related
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments Palm Harbor, Florida
|
|
$
|
10,604
|
|
|
$
|
1,928
|
|
|
$
|
9,283
|
|
|
$
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Amount At Which Carried
At December 31, 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Depreciable
|
|
Description
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Life-Years
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
13,929
|
|
|
$
|
15,629
|
|
|
$
|
8,542
|
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
08/28/86
|
|
|
|
5-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Investment Property and Accumulated
Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Investment Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
15,358
|
|
|
$
|
14,089
|
|
Property improvements and replacements
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
Disposal of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
15,629
|
|
|
$
|
15,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
7,756
|
|
|
$
|
7,144
|
|
Additions charged to expense
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
Disposal of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,542
|
|
|
$
|
7,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate cost of the real estate for Federal income tax
purposes at December 31, 2009 and 2008, is approximately
$16,534,000 and $16,200,000, respectively. The accumulated
depreciation taken for Federal income tax purposes at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 is approximately $12,081,000 and
$11,520,000, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Twin Lakes
Apartments suffered water damage as a result of several
occurances of water pipe breaks in several of the
Partnerships apartment units. As of December 31,
2008, the Partnership had incurred, in total, approximately
$79,000 in capitalizable costs and approximately $17,000 in
clean up costs to repair the water damages incurred during the
year. The Partnership did not receive any insurance proceeds as
the damages for the various individual claims did not exceed the
Partnerships insurance deductible. The Partnership
recognized a casualty loss, which is included in operating
expenses, of approximately $16,000
D-20
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
during the year ended December 31, 2008 as a result of the
write off of approximately $16,000 of undepreciated property
improvements and replacements.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Twin Lakes
Apartments suffered water damage as a result of a water pipe
break in additional apartment units. The Partnership incurred
approximately $32,000 in capitalizable costs related to this
damage. The Partnership received insurance proceeds of
approximately $27,000 for damages which includes approximately
$5,000 for lost rental income. The Partnership recognized a
casualty gain of approximately $16,000, which is included in
operating expenses, during the year ended December 31, 2008
as a result of the write off of approximately $6,000 of
undepreciated property improvements and replacements.
As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP
Management Company, both affiliates of the Corporate General
Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective
action in August 2003 in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully
violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by
failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in
excess of 40 hours per week (overtime claims).
The plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and
NHP Management Company (the Defendants) failed to
compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required
to be on-call (on-call claims). In March
2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the
collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs counsel filed
individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions. In the
second quarter of 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the
overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a
framework for resolving the 88 remaining on-call
claims and the attorneys fees claimed by plaintiffs
counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal
courts have been dismissed. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
the Partnership paid approximately $12,000 for settlement
amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked
at the Partnerships investment property. At this time, the
88 remaining on-call claims and the attorneys
fees claimed by plaintiffs counsel are not resolved. The
parties have selected six on-call claims that will
proceed forward through the arbitration process and have
selected arbitrators. After those arbitrations have been
completed, the parties will revisit settling the on-call claims.
The first two arbitrations took place in December 2009 and the
Defendants received a defense verdict against the first two
claimants, and plaintiffs dismissed the claims of the next two
claimants. The remaining two arbitrations will take place in
April 2010. The Corporate General Partner is uncertain as to the
amount of any additional loss that may be allocable to the
Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot estimate whether
any additional loss will occur or a potential range of loss.
The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding
litigation matters involving it or its investment property that
are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of
business.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or
operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal
or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a
property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew
of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the
hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage
or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to
sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs
associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by
government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by
such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous
substances on a property could result in claims by private
plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other
infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of
removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through
a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges
for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is
potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose
liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal
ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In
D-21
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
connection with the ownership, operation and management of its
property, the Partnership could potentially be liable for
environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.
Mold
The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers
of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury
and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of
which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or
settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage
for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of
mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner have implemented
policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the
Corporate General Partner believes that these measures will
prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects
that mold may have on residents. To date, the Partnership has
not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to
claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the
law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the
Corporate General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities
resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have
a material adverse effect on the Partnerships financial
condition or results of operations.
D-22
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A(T).
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
|
The Partnerships management, with the participation of the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer of
the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the
Partnerships principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the
Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the
Partnerships principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls
and procedures are effective.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
The Partnerships management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting
is defined in Rule
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial
officers of the Corporate General Partner, who are the
equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, respectively, and effected by
the Partnerships management and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures
that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of assets;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of the Partnerships
management; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Partnerships management assessed the effectiveness of
the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, the
Partnerships management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on their assessment, the Partnerships management
concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the
Partnerships internal control over financial reporting is
effective.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the
Partnerships registered public accounting firm regarding
internal control over financial reporting. Managements
report was not subject to the attestation by the
Partnerships registered public accounting firm pursuant to
temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that
permit the Partnership to provide only managements report
in this annual report.
D-23
|
|
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
|
There has been no change in the Partnerships internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2009 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
U.S. Realty Partnership (the Partnership or the
Registrant) has no officers or directors.
U.S. Realty I Corporation (the Corporate General
Partner) manages and controls substantially all of the
Partnerships affairs and has general responsibility in all
matters affecting its business.
The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held
by, the present directors and officers of the Corporate General
Partner are set forth below. There are no family relationships
between or among any officers or directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Steven D. Cordes
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Director and Senior Vice President
|
John Bezzant
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director and Senior Vice President
|
Timothy J. Beaudin
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Ernest M. Freedman
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Lisa R. Cohn
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Paul Beldin
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
|
Stephen B. Waters
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting
|
Steven D. Cordes was appointed as a Director of the
Corporate General Partner effective March 2, 2009.
Mr. Cordes has been a Senior Vice President of the
Corporate General Partner and AIMCO since May 2007.
Mr. Cordes joined AIMCO in 2001 as a Vice President of
Capital Markets with responsibility for AIMCOs joint
ventures and equity capital markets activity. Prior to joining
AIMCO, Mr. Cordes was a manager in the financial consulting
practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Effective March 2009,
Mr. Cordes was appointed to serve as the equivalent of the
chief executive officer of the Partnership. Mr. Cordes
brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of asset
management as well as finance and accounting.
John Bezzant was appointed as a Director of the Corporate
General Partner effective December 16, 2009.
Mr. Bezzant has been a Senior Vice President of the
Corporate General Partner and AIMCO since joining AIMCO in June
2006. Prior to joining AIMCO, from 2005 to June 2006,
Mr. Bezzant was a First Vice President at Prologis, a
Denver, Colorado-based real estate investment trust, and from
1986 to 2005, Mr. Bezzant served as Vice President, Asset
Management at Catellus Development Corporation, a
San Francisco, California-based real estate investment
trust. Mr. Bezzant brings particular expertise to the Board
in the areas of real estate finance, property operations, sales
and development.
Timothy J. Beaudin was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer of AIMCO and the Corporate General Partner in
February 2009. He joined AIMCO and the Corporate General Partner
as Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer in
October 2005 and was appointed Executive Vice President and
Chief Property Operating Officer of the Corporate General
Partner and AIMCO in October 2008. Mr. Beaudin oversees
conventional and affordable property operations, transactions,
asset management, and redevelopment and construction services
for AIMCO and the Corporate General Partner. Prior to joining
AIMCO and beginning in 1995,
D-24
Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development Corporation.
During his last five years at Catellus, Mr. Beaudin served
as Executive Vice President, with management responsibility for
development, construction and asset management.
Ernest M. Freedman was appointed Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporate General Partner and
AIMCO in November 2009. Mr. Freedman joined AIMCO in 2007
as Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis and
has served as Senior Vice President of Finance since February
2009, responsible for financial planning, tax, accounting and
related areas. Prior to joining AIMCO, from 2004 to 2007,
Mr. Freedman served as chief financial officer of HEI
Hotels and Resorts.
Lisa R. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporate General Partner
and AIMCO in December 2007. From January 2004 to December 2007,
Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and Assistant
General Counsel of AIMCO. Ms. Cohn joined AIMCO in July
2002 as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel. Prior to
joining AIMCO, Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the
law firm of Hogan and Hartson LLP.
Paul Beldin joined AIMCO in May 2008 and has served as
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of AIMCO and
the Corporate General Partner since that time. Prior to joining
AIMCO, Mr. Beldin served as controller and then as chief
financial officer of America First Apartment Investors, Inc., a
publicly traded multifamily real estate investment trust, from
May 2005 to September 2007 when the company was acquired by
Sentinel Real Estate Corporation. Prior to joining America First
Apartment Investors, Inc., Mr. Beldin was a senior manager
at Deloitte and Touche LLP, where he was employed from August
1996 to May 2005, including two years as an audit manager in SEC
services at Deloittes national office.
Stephen B. Waters was appointed Senior Director of
Partnership Accounting of AIMCO and the Corporate General
Partner in June 2009. Mr. Waters has responsibility for
partnership accounting with AIMCO and serves as the principal
financial officer of the Corporate General Partner.
Mr. Waters joined AIMCO as a Director of Real Estate
Accounting in September 1999 and was appointed Vice President of
the Corporate General Partner and AIMCO in April 2004. Prior to
joining AIMCO, Mr. Waters was a senior manager at
Ernst & Young LLP.
The Registrant is not aware of the involvement in any legal
proceedings with respect to the directors and executive officers
listed in this Item 10.
One or more of the above persons are also directors
and/or
officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general
partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of
securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or
more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment
Investment and Management Company and the general partner of
AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.
The board of directors of the Corporate General Partner does not
have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors
of the Corporate General Partner fulfills the functions of an
audit committee. The board of directors has determined that
Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an audit
committee financial expert.
The directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner with
authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries
of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code of ethics that applies to
such directors and officers that is posted on AIMCOs
website (www.AIMCO.com). AIMCOs website is not
incorporated by reference to this filing.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
None of the directors and officers of the Corporate General
Partner received any remuneration from the Partnership during
the year ended December 31, 2009.
D-25
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Except as noted below, no person or entity was known by the
Partnership to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the
Depositary Unit Certificates (DUCs) as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity
|
|
Number of DUCs
|
|
Percentage
|
|
AIMCO Properties, L.P. (an affiliate of AIMCO)
|
|
|
900,195
|
|
|
|
73.67
|
%
|
AIMCO Properties, L.P. is ultimately owned by AIMCO. Its
business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway,
Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.
No director or officer of the Corporate General Partner owns any
DUCs.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate
General Partner and its affiliates for the management and
administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership
Agreement provides for (i) certain payments to affiliates
for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates of the Corporate General Partner on
behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner receive 5% of gross
receipts from the Partnerships property as compensation
for providing property management services. The Partnership paid
to such affiliates approximately $123,000 and $126,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which
is included in operating expenses.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged the
Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses
amounting to approximately $85,000 and $206,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is
included in general and administrative expenses and investment
property. The portion of these reimbursements included in
investment property for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 are charges for construction management services
provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of
approximately $57,000 and $158,000, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 approximately $53,000 of reimbursements
were owed and are included in due to affiliates. No amounts were
owed at December 31, 2009.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, AIMCO
Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner
advanced the Partnership approximately $365,000 and $1,222,000
to fund capital improvements and real estate taxes at Twin Lake
Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the
Partnership repaid AIMCO Properties, L.P. approximately $285,000
which included approximately $142,000 of accrued interest. No
such payments were made during the year ended December 31,
2008. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, interest was
charged at prime plus 2% (5.25% at December 31, 2009).
Interest expense was approximately $91,000 and $58,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the total outstanding advances
and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. was
approximately $1,764,000 and $1,593,000, respectively, and was
included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive
additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P.
although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such
advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P.,
including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits
through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally
self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to
workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and
vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above
the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO
from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates
approximately $77,000 and $57,000, respectively, for insurance
coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner
interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned
900,195 DUCs in the Partnership representing 73.67% of the
outstanding DUCs at December 31, 2009. A number of these
DUCs were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or
its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will
acquire additional DUCs in exchange for cash or a combination of
cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating
partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender
offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, DUC holders
holding a majority of the DUCs are entitled to take action with
respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not
limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership
D-26
Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As
a result of its ownership of 73.67% of the outstanding DUCs,
AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting
decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the
Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited
partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also
owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a
result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as
corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate
General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The Corporate General Partner has reappointed Ernst &
Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the financial
statements of the Partnership for 2010. The aggregate fees
billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for
2009 and 2008 are described below.
Audit Fees. Fees for audit services
totaled approximately $38,000 and $44,000 for 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Fees for audit services also include fees for the
reviews of the Partnerships Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q.
Tax Fees. Fees for tax services totaled
approximately $7,000 for both of the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following financial statements of the Registrant
are included in Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
D-11
|
|
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
D-12
|
|
Statements of Changes in Partners Deficit for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
D-13
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
D-14
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
D-15
|
|
Schedules are omitted for the reason that they are inapplicable
or equivalent information has been included elsewhere herein.
(b) Exhibits:
See Exhibit index
The agreements included as exhibits to this
Form 10-K
contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to
the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties
have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to
the applicable agreement and:
|
|
|
|
|
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements
of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of
the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable
agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in
the agreement;
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to an investor; and
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or
such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement
and are subject to more recent developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time. The Partnership acknowledges that,
notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary
statements, it is responsible for considering whether additional
specific disclosures of material information regarding material
contractual provisions are required to make the statements in
this
Form 10-K
not misleading. Additional information about the Partnership may
be found elsewhere in this
Form 10-K
and the Partnerships other public filings, which are
available without charge through the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
D-27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
By:
|
U.S. Realty I Corporation
Corporate General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Steven
D. Cordes
|
Steven D. Cordes
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephen
B. Waters
|
Stephen B. Waters
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting
Date: March 29, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
Bezzant
John
Bezzant
|
|
Director and Senior Vice President
|
|
Date: March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
D. Cordes
Steven
D. Cordes
|
|
Director and Senior Vice President
|
|
Date: March 29, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen
B. Waters
Stephen
B. Waters
|
|
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting
|
|
Date: March 29, 2010
|
D-28
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
See Exhibit 4(a)
|
|
4(a)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited
Partnership (included as Exhibit A to the Prospectus of
Registrant dated August 19, 1986 contained in Amendment
No. 4 Registration Statement,
No. 33-2996,
of Registrant filed August 19, 1986 (the
Prospectus) and is incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Subscription Agreement and Signature Page (included as
Exhibit B to the Prospectus and is incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Instruments governing the Bonds (filed as Exhibit 10C to
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement,
No. 33-2996,
of Registrant filed August 19, 1986 and incorporated herein
by reference).
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
First Amendment to U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (dated
August 15, 1986) dated October 14, 1993. [Filed
as Exhibit 4(c) to
Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated
herein by reference.]
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership
Agreement dated April 12, 2005. [Filed as Exhibit 4(e)
to
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference.]
|
|
10(i)
|
|
|
Contracts related to acquisition of property:
|
|
(l)
|
|
|
Depositary Agreement dated as of October 15, 1993, among
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, First Union National
Bank of South Carolina and Continental Casualty Company.*
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
Financial Statement
Form UCC-1,
State of South Carolina, Office of Secretary of State Jim Miles
by US Realty Partners Limited Partnership and Continental
Casualty Company.*
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
Incumbency Certificate by U.S. Realty I Corporation and U.S.
Realty Partners Limited Partnership.*
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement
dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage
Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty
Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC
Commercial Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Replacement Reserve Agreement dated December 1, 2005
between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Guaranty dated December 1, 2005 between AIMCO Properties,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial
Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Amended and Restated Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents,
and Security Agreement dated December 1, 2005 between U.S.
Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Multifamily Note dated December 1,
2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty dated December 1, 2005
between AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Form of Multifamily Note between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty
Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership,
dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Form of Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security
Agreement between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty Partners Limited
Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, dated
September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 14, 2007.
|
D-29
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Form of Replacement Reserve Agreement between Capmark Bank and
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
partnership, dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 14, 2007.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
99
|
|
|
Prospectus of Registrant dated August 19, 1986 (included in
Registration Statement,
No. 33-2996,
of Registrant and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed as Exhibits 10iii (l) through (n) to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1993
and incorporated herein by reference. |
D-30
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven D. Cordes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)),
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Steven D. Cordes
Senior Vice President of U.S. Realty I Corporation, equivalent
of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
Date: March 29, 2010
D-31
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)),
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Stephen B. Waters
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting of U.S. Realty I
Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the
Partnership
Date: March 29, 2010
D-32
Exhibit 32.1
Certification
of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership (the
Partnership), for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven
D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the
chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.
Name: Steven D. Cordes
Date: March 29, 2010
Name: Stephen B. Waters
Date: March 29, 2010
This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not
be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
D-33
ANNEX E
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-15656
U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
57-0814502
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(Address of principal
executive offices)
(864) 239-1000
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such
files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). o Yes þ No
E-1
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Note)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Receivables and deposits
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Investment property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Buildings and related personal property
|
|
|
14,076
|
|
|
|
13,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,776
|
|
|
|
15,629
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(9,132
|
)
|
|
|
(8,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,644
|
|
|
|
7,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,117
|
|
|
$
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS DEFICIT
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
Tenant security deposit liabilities
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Accrued property taxes
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Due to affiliates (Note B)
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,553
|
|
|
|
12,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Depositary unit certificate holders (2,440,000 units
authorized; 1,222,000 units issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
|
(5,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
(5,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,117
|
|
|
$
|
7,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date but does not
include all the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
E-2
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
534
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
1,620
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to general partners (1%)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Net loss allocated to depositary unit certificate holders (99%)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per depositary unit certificate
|
|
$
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
E-3
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Certificate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Holders
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
Original capital contributions
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
30,550
|
|
|
$
|
30,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners deficit at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,064
|
)
|
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners deficit at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,222,000
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
E-4
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(400
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Change in accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables and deposits
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Tenant security deposit liabilities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Accrued property taxes
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property improvements and replacements
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
Net withdrawals from restricted escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Advances from affiliates
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Repayment of advances from affiliates
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
642
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property improvements and replacements in accounts payable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximately $7,000 and
$74,000, respectively, of property improvements and replacements
were included in accounts payable and are included in property
improvements and replacements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
E-5
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note A
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership (the
Partnership or Registrant) have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to
Form 10-Q
and
Article 8-03
of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. The general partner
responsible for management of the Partnerships business is
U.S. Realty I Corporation, a South Carolina corporation
(the Corporate General Partner). In the opinion of
the Corporate General Partner, all adjustments (consisting of
normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. Operating results for the three
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. For further
information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in the Partnerships Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The Corporate
General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apartment
Investment and Management Company (AIMCO), a
publicly traded real estate investment trust.
The Partnerships management evaluated subsequent events
through the time this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
was filed.
Organization: On October 8, 2010,
the Partnership entered into an agreement and plan of merger
with AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and
Aimco USRP Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
of which AIMCO Properties, L.P. is the sole member (the
Merger Subsidiary), pursuant to which the Merger
Subsidiary will be merged with and into the Partnership, with
the Partnership as the surviving entity.
Under the merger agreement, holders of depository unit
certificates (DUCs) outstanding immediately prior to the
consummation of the merger, except those held by limited
partners who perfect their appraisal rights pursuant to the
merger agreement, will be converted into the right to receive,
at the election of the limited partner, either (i) $2.76 in
cash (the Cash Consideration) or (ii) a number
of partnership common units of AIMCO Properties, L.P. calculated
by dividing $2.76 by the average closing price of Apartment
Investment and Management Company common stock, as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange, over the ten consecutive trading
days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger (the OP Unit
Consideration). However, if AIMCO Properties, L.P.
determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of
partnership common units of AIMCO Properties, L.P. in that state
or jurisdiction (or that registration in that state or other
jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited
partner will only be entitled to receive the Cash Consideration
for each DUC. Those limited partners who do not make an election
will be deemed to have elected to receive cash.
After the merger, AIMCO Properties, L.P. will be the sole
limited partner of the Partnership, holding all outstanding
DUCs. U.S. Realty I Corporation will continue to be the
corporate general partner of the Partnership after the merger,
AIMCO Properties, L.P. will continue to be the individual
general partner of the Partnership after the merger, and the
Partnership Agreement in effect immediately prior to the merger
will remain unchanged immediately following the merger.
Completion of the merger is subject to certain conditions,
including approval by a majority in interest of the DUCs. As of
September 30, 2010, the Partnership had issued and
outstanding 1,222,000 DUCs, and AIMCO Properties, L.P. and its
affiliates owned 900,195 of those DUCs, or approximately 73.67%
of the number of outstanding DUCs. AIMCO Properties L.P. and its
affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by
written consent to approve the merger.
E-6
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note B
|
Transactions
with Affiliated Parties
|
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate
General Partner and its affiliates for the management and
administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership
Agreement provides for (i) certain payments to affiliates
for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses
incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner receive 5% of gross
receipts from the Partnerships property as compensation
for providing property management services. The Partnership paid
to such affiliates approximately $94,000 and $91,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, which is included in operating expenses.
Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged the
Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses
amounting to approximately $24,000 and $79,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
which is included in general and administrative expenses and
investment property. The portion of these reimbursements
included in investment property for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 are construction management
services provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General
Partner of approximately $2,000 and $56,000, respectively. No
amounts were owed at September 30, 2010 or
December 31, 2009.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General
Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $137,000 and
$205,000, respectively, to fund operating expenses and capital
improvements, respectively, at Twin Lakes Apartments. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the
Partnership repaid AIMCO Properties, L.P. $275,000 and $225,000,
respectively, of principal and accrued interest. In accordance
with the Partnership Agreement, interest was charged at prime
plus 2% (5.25% at September 30, 2010). Interest expense was
approximately $69,000 and $68,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the total
outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO
Properties, L.P. was approximately $1,695,000 and $1,764,000,
respectively, and was included in due to affiliates. The
Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO
Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not
obligated to provide such advances. For more information on
AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance
sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits
through coverage provided by AIMCO, which is generally
self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to
workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and
vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above
the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO
from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates
approximately $85,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated
with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be
incurred by the Partnership during 2010 as other insurance
policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by
AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $77,000 for insurance
coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration
during the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
Note C
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires
disclosure of fair value information about financial
instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for
which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is
defined as the amount at which the instruments could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties,
other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership
believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments
(except for mortgage notes payable) approximates their fair
value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The
Partnership estimates the fair value of its mortgage notes
payable by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate
commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the
Partnership for similar
E-7
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
term, mortgage notes payable. At September 30, 2010, the
fair value of the Partnerships mortgage notes payable at
the Partnerships incremental borrowing rate was
approximately $11,477,000.
As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP
Management Company, both affiliates of the Corporate General
Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective
action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated
the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to
pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of
40 hours per week (overtime claims). The
plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP
Management Company (the Defendants) failed to
compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required
to be on-call (on-call claims). In March
2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the
collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs counsel filed
individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions. In the
second quarter of 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the
overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a
framework for resolving the 88 remaining on-call
claims and the attorneys fees claimed by plaintiffs
counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal
courts have been dismissed. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
the Partnership paid approximately $12,000 for settlement
amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked
at the Partnerships investment property. At this time, the
88 remaining on-call claims and the attorneys
fees claimed by plaintiffs counsel are not resolved.
Pursuant to the global settlement agreement, the parties
selected six test on-call cases to be arbitrated.
The parties arbitrated four on-call claims and
obtained defense verdicts on all four. Two additional
on-call claims were dismissed with prejudice. The
process now calls for the parties to attempt to mediate the
remaining on-call claims and plaintiffs
attorneys fees, and the mediation is currently scheduled
for November 16, 2010. The Corporate General Partner is
uncertain as to the amount of any additional loss that may be
allocable to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot
estimate whether any additional loss will occur or a potential
range of loss.
The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding
litigation matters involving it or its investment property that
are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of
business.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or
operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal
or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a
property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew
of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the
hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage
or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to
sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs
associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by
government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by
such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous
substances on a property could result in claims by private
plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other
infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of
removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through
a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges
for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is
potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose
liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal
ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with
the ownership, operation and management of its property, the
Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental
liabilities or costs associated with its property.
Mold
The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers
of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury
and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of
which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or
settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage
for property damage loss
E-8
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury
claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Corporate
General Partner have implemented policies, procedures,
third-party audits and training and the Corporate General
Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate
mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have
on residents. To date, the Partnership has not incurred any
material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold
exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding
mold is unsettled and subject to change the Corporate General
Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from
the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material
adverse effect on the Partnerships financial condition or
results of operations.
E-9
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a
safe harbor for forward-looking statements in
certain circumstances. Certain information included in this
Quarterly Report contains or may contain information that is
forward-looking, within the meaning of the federal securities
laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding the
effect of redevelopments, the Partnerships future
financial performance, including the Partnerships ability
to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels,
and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may
differ materially from those described in these forward-looking
statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors, some of which are beyond the
Partnerships control including, without limitation:
financing risks, including the availability and cost of
financing and the risk that the Partnerships cash flows
from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of
principal and interest; natural disasters and severe weather
such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the
general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of
governmental regulations that affect the Partnerships
property and interpretations of those regulations; the
competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; real
estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and
the general economic climate in local markets and competition
for residents in such markets; insurance risk, including the
cost of insurance; development risks; litigation, including
costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any
adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities,
including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to
necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently
owned or previously owned by the Partnership. Readers should
carefully review the Partnerships financial statements and
the notes thereto, as well as the other documents the
Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The Partnerships investment property consists of one
apartment complex. The following table sets forth the average
occupancy of the property for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
Property
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments Palm Harbor, Florida
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
The Corporate General Partner attributes the increase in
occupancy to competitive pricing efforts.
The Partnerships financial results depend upon a number of
factors, including the ability to attract and maintain tenants
at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans,
costs incurred to operate the investment property, general
economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business
plan of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner monitors
the rental market environment of its investment property to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or
increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from
increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Corporate
General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the
burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing
rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However,
the Corporate General Partner may use rental concessions and
rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions;
accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Corporate General
Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number
of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership, such
as the local economic climate and weather, can adversely or
positively affect the Partnerships financial results.
Results
of Operations
The Partnerships net loss was approximately $114,000 and
$372,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively, compared with net loss of approximately
$103,000 and $400,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. The increase in net loss
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is due to an
increase in total expenses. The decrease in net loss for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 is due to an increase
in total revenues.
Total revenues remained relatively constant for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 as a decrease in rental income was
substantially offset by an increase in other income. Total
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
increased due to an increase in rental income and other income.
Rental income decreased for the three month period due to a
decrease in the average rental rate and an increase in bad debt
expense, partially offset by an increase in occupancy. Rental
income increased for the nine month period due to an increase in
E-10
occupancy and a decrease in bad debt expense, partially offset
by a decrease in the average rental rate at Twin Lakes
Apartments. Other income increased for both periods primarily
due to an increase in resident utility reimbursements and lease
cancellation fees at Twin Lakes Apartments. The increase in
other income for the nine month period was partially offset by a
decrease in ancillary services income.
Total expenses increased for the three month period ended
September 30, 2010 due to increases in operating and
property tax expenses. Total expenses remained relatively
constant for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010
as an increase in operating expenses was partially offset by a
decrease in property tax expense. General and administrative,
depreciation and interest expenses remained relatively constant
for both periods. Operating expenses increased for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 due to additional
landscaping costs as a result of freeze damage to the grounds
which occurred in January 2010, partially offset by decreases in
contract services and resident eviction costs. Operating
expenses increased for both periods due to tree removal costs at
Twin Lakes Apartments and a decrease in capitalized payroll
costs. Property tax expense increased during the three months
ended September 30, 2010 due to an adjustment recorded in
the third quarter of 2009 to reflect a decrease in the assessed
value of the property. Property tax expense decreased for the
nine month period due to a decrease in the assessed value of the
property.
Included in general and administrative expense for both the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are
management reimbursements to the Corporate General Partner as
allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included in
general and administrative expense are costs associated with the
quarterly and annual communications with investors and
regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the
Partnership Agreement.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2010, the Partnership had cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $95,000 compared to approximately
$101,000 at December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents
decreased by approximately $6,000 due to approximately $166,000
and $154,000 of cash used in financing and investing activities,
respectively, partially offset by approximately $314,000 of cash
provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing
activities consisted of repayments of advances from AIMCO
Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner
and payments on the mortgages encumbering the investment
property, partially offset by advances from AIMCO Properties,
L.P. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property
improvements and replacements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General
Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $137,000 and
$205,000, respectively, to fund operating expenses and capital
improvements, respectively, at Twin Lakes Apartments. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the
Partnership repaid AIMCO Properties, L.P. $275,000 and $225,000,
respectively, of principal and accrued interest. In accordance
with the Partnership Agreement, interest was charged at prime
plus 2% (5.25% at September 30, 2010). Interest expense was
approximately $69,000 and $68,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the total
outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO
Properties, L.P. was approximately $1,695,000 and $1,764,000,
respectively, and was included in due to affiliates. The
Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO
Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not
obligated to provide such advances. For more information on
AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance
sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future
liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly
related to the level of capital expenditures required at the
property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other
operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,
state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The
Corporate General Partner monitors developments in the area of
legal and regulatory compliance. Capital improvements planned
for the Partnerships property are detailed below.
Twin
Lakes Apartments
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Partnership completed approximately $147,000 of capital
expenditures at Twin Lakes Apartments, consisting primarily of
swimming pool resurfacing and appliance
E-11
and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded
from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates
the capital improvement needs of the property. While the
Partnership has no material commitments for property
improvements and replacements, certain routine capital
expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2010. Such
capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of
the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the
property.
Additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is
available from operations, Partnership reserves or advances from
AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not
obligated to provide such advances. To the extent that capital
improvements are completed, the Partnerships distributable
cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the
short term.
The Partnerships assets are thought to be generally
sufficient for any near term needs (exclusive of capital
improvements and repayment of amounts due to affiliates) of the
Partnership. At September 30, 2010, the first, second and
third mortgage indebtedness on Twin Lakes Apartments of
approximately $6,077,000, $3,365,000 and $1,064,000,
respectively, require monthly payments of principal and interest
until December 1, 2015 when balloon payments of
approximately $5,685,000, $3,025,000 and $963,000, respectively,
are due. The Partnership has the option of extending the
maturity date on both the first and second mortgages for one
additional year, to December 1, 2016. With respect to the
third mortgage, the maturity date will automatically be extended
for one year, to December 1, 2016, if no event of default
exists at its original maturity date of December 1, 2015.
The Corporate General Partner will attempt to refinance such
indebtedness
and/or sell
the property prior to such maturity dates. If the property
cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the
Partnership will risk losing such property through foreclosure.
The Partnership made no distributions during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 or 2009. Future cash distributions
will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations,
the timing of the debt maturities, refinancings,
and/or
property sale. The Partnerships cash available for
distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the
amounts accrued and payable to affiliates at September 30,
2010, it is unlikely that the Partnership will generate
sufficient funds from operations, after capital improvement
expenditures and repayment of amounts accrued and payable to
affiliates, to permit distributions to its partners during 2010
or subsequent periods.
The Partnership Agreement provides for partners to receive
distributions from the net proceeds of the sales of properties,
the net proceeds from refinancings and net cash from operations
as those terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement. The
Partnership Agreement requires that the limited partners be
furnished with a statement of Net Cash from Operations as such
term is defined in the Partnership Agreement. Net Cash from
Operations should not be considered an alternative to net loss
as an indicator of the Partnerships operating performance
or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Below is a
reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities as
disclosed in the statements of cash flows, included in
Item 1. Financial Statements, to Net Cash from
Operations as defined in the Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Payments on mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Property improvements and replacements
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
Advances from affiliates
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Payments on advances from affiliates
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Net decrease in restricted escrows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Changes in reserves for net operating liabilities
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operations (as defined in the
Partnership Agreement)
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-12
Distributions made from reserves no longer considered necessary
by the Corporate General Partner are considered net cash from
operations for allocation purposes.
Other
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner
interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned
900,195 depository unit certificates (DUCs) in the Partnership
representing 73.67% of the outstanding DUCs at
September 30, 2010. A number of these DUCs were acquired
pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates.
Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, DUC holders holding a
majority of the DUCs are entitled to take action with respect to
a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to,
voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and
voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of
its ownership of 73.67% of the outstanding DUCs, AIMCO and its
affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions
with respect to the Partnership. Although the Corporate General
Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the
Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary
duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties
of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner,
to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into
conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to
AIMCO as its sole stockholder.
On October 8, 2010, the Partnership entered into an
agreement and plan of merger with AIMCO Properties, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership, and Aimco USRP Merger Sub LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company of which AIMCO Properties,
L.P. is the sole member (the Merger Subsidiary),
pursuant to which the Merger Subsidiary will be merged with and
into the Partnership, with the Partnership as the surviving
entity.
Under the merger agreement, holders of depository unit
certificates (DUCs) outstanding immediately prior to the
consummation of the merger, except those held by limited
partners who perfect their appraisal rights pursuant to the
merger agreement, will be converted into the right to receive,
at the election of the limited partner, either (i) $2.76 in
cash (the Cash Consideration) or (ii) a number
of partnership common units of AIMCO Properties, L.P. calculated
by dividing $2.76 by the average closing price of Apartment
Investment and Management Company common stock, as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange, over the ten consecutive trading
days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger (the OP Unit
Consideration). However, if AIMCO Properties, L.P.
determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in
which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of
partnership common units of AIMCO Properties, L.P. in that state
or jurisdiction (or that registration in that state or other
jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited
partner will only be entitled to receive the Cash Consideration
for each DUC. Those limited partners who do not make an election
will be deemed to have elected to receive cash.
After the merger, AIMCO Properties, L.P. will be the sole
limited partner of the Partnership, holding all outstanding
DUCs. U.S. Realty I Corporation will continue to be the
corporate general partner of the Partnership after the merger,
AIMCO Properties, L.P. will continue to be the individual
general partner of the Partnership after the merger, and the
Partnership Agreement in effect immediately prior to the merger
will remain unchanged immediately following the merger.
Completion of the merger is subject to certain conditions,
including approval by a majority in interest of the DUCs. As of
September 30, 2010, the Partnership had issued and
outstanding 1,222,000 DUCs, and AIMCO Properties, L.P. and its
affiliates owned 900,195 of those DUCs, or approximately 73.67%
of the number of outstanding DUCs. AIMCO Properties L.P. and its
affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by
written consent to approve the merger.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.
The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting
policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment
and complexity.
E-13
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated
depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not
recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the
Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by
comparing the carrying amount to the Partnerships estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the
Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the
carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.
Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.
Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance
and value of the Partnerships investment property. These
factors include, but are not limited to, general economic
climate; competition from other apartment communities and other
housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an
increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect
apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental
regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in
operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation
and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents;
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of
rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing;
and change in interest rates and the availability of financing.
Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an
impairment of the Partnerships asset.
Revenue
Recognition
The Partnership generally leases apartment units for
twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental
concessions during particularly slow months or in response to
heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.
Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents
and establishes an allowance, after the application of security
deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on
current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.
|
|
Item 4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures.
|
The Partnerships management, with the participation of the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer of
the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the
Partnerships principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the
Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the
Partnerships principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls
and procedures are effective.
|
|
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
|
There has been no change in the Partnerships internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this
report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal
control over financial reporting.
E-14
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP
Management Company, both affiliates of the Corporate General
Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective
action in August 2003 in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully
violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by
failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in
excess of 40 hours per week (overtime claims).
The plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and
NHP Management Company (the Defendants) failed to
compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required
to be on-call (on-call claims). In March
2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the
collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs counsel filed
individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions. In the
second quarter of 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the
overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a
framework for resolving the 88 remaining on-call
claims and the attorneys fees claimed by plaintiffs
counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal
courts have been dismissed. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
the Partnership paid approximately $12,000 for settlement
amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked
at the Partnerships investment property. At this time, the
88 remaining on-call claims and the attorneys
fees claimed by plaintiffs counsel are not resolved.
Pursuant to the global settlement agreement, the parties
selected six test on-call cases to be arbitrated.
The parties arbitrated four on-call claims and
obtained defense verdicts on all four. Two additional
on-call claims were dismissed with prejudice. The
process now calls for the parties to attempt to mediate the
remaining on-call claims and plaintiffs
attorneys fees, and the mediation is currently scheduled
for November 16, 2010. The Corporate General Partner is
uncertain as to the amount of any additional loss that may be
allocable to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot
estimate whether any additional loss will occur or a potential
range of loss.
See Exhibit Index.
The agreements included as exhibits to this
Form 10-Q
contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to
the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties
have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to
the applicable agreement and:
|
|
|
|
|
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements
of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of
the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable
agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in
the agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to an investor; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or
such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement
and are subject to more recent developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time. The Partnership acknowledges that,
notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary
statements, it is responsible for considering whether additional
specific disclosures of material information regarding material
contractual provisions are required to make the statements in
this
Form 10-Q
not misleading. Additional information about the Partnership may
be found elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q
and the Partnerships other public filings, which are
available without charge through the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
E-15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
U.S. Realty I Corporation
Corporate General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Steven
D. Cordes
Steven
D. Cordes
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 12, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Stephen
B. Waters
Stephen
B. Waters
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting
|
E-16
U.S.
REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
See Exhibit 4(a)
|
|
4(a)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited
Partnership (included as Exhibit A to the Prospectus of
Registrant dated August 19, 1986 contained in Amendment No. 4
Registration Statement, No. 33-2996, of Registrant filed August
19, 1986 (the Prospectus) and is incorporated herein
by reference).
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Subscription Agreement and Signature Page (included as Exhibit B
to the Prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Instruments governing the Bonds (filed as Exhibit 10C to
Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement, No. 33-2996, of
Registrant filed August 19, 1986 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
First Amendment to U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (dated
August 15, 1986) dated October 14, 1993. [Filed as Exhibit 4(c)
to
Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated herein
by reference.]
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership
Agreement dated April 12, 2005. [Filed as Exhibit 4(e) to Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference.]
|
|
10(i)
|
|
|
Contracts related to acquisition of property:
|
|
(l)
|
|
|
Depositary Agreement dated as of October 15, 1993, among U.S.
Realty Partners Limited Partnership, First Union National Bank
of South Carolina and Continental Casualty Company.*
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
Financial Statement - Form UCC-1, State of South Carolina,
Office of Secretary of State Jim Miles by US Realty Partners
Limited Partnership and Continental Casualty Company.*
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
Incumbency Certificate by U.S. Realty I Corporation and U.S.
Realty Partners Limited Partnership.*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 8, 2010, by and
among U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, Aimco
Properties, L.P. and Aimco USRP Merger Sub LLC. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 8, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement
dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank.
Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty
Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC
Commercial Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Replacement Reserve Agreement dated December 1, 2005 between
U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by reference to
Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Guaranty dated December 1, 2005 between AIMCO Properties, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage
Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K
dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Amended and Restated Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents,
and Security Agreement dated December 1, 2005 between U.S.
Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005
between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty dated December 1, 2005 between
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Incorporated by
reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Form of Multifamily Note between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty
Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership,
dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2007.
|
E-17
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Form of Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security
Agreement between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty Partners Limited
Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, dated September 14,
2007. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K
dated September 14, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Form of Replacement Reserve Agreement between Capmark Bank and
U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
partnership, dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference
to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2007.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
99
|
|
|
Prospectus of Registrant dated August 19, 1986 (included in
Registration Statement, No. 33-2996, of Registrant and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed as Exhibits 10iii (l) through (n) to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1993
and incorporated herein by reference. |
E-18
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven D. Cordes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)),
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Steven D. Cordes
Senior Vice President of U.S. Realty I Corporation,
equivalent of the chief executive officer of the
Partnership
Date: November 12, 2010
E-19
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)),
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Stephen B. Waters
Senior Director of Partnership Accounting of U.S. Realty I
Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the
Partnership
Date: November 12, 2010
E-20
Exhibit 32.1
Certification
of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership (the
Partnership), for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive
officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the
equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.
Name: Steven D. Cordes
Date: November 12, 2010
Name: Stephen B. Waters
Date: November 12, 2010
This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not
be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
E-21
ANNEX F
SUMMARY
OF APPRAISALS TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twin Lakes Apartments
|
|
|
Appraised Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as of April 26,
|
|
|
|
Valuation Methodology
|
|
2010)
|
|
|
Material Assumptions
|
|
Income Capitalization Approach Direct
Capitalization Analysis
|
|
$
|
15,900,000
|
|
|
potential gross income from apartment
unit rentals of $214,488 per month or $2,573,856 for the
appraised year;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no allowance attributable to loss for
lease;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rent concessions of 4.0% of the gross rent potential;
a combined vacancy and collection loss allowance of 7.0%;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
estimated utility recovery of $715 per
unit in 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other income of $600 per unit for the
appraised fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
projected total expenses (including
reserves) of $1,363,258;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capitalization rate of 8.0%.
|
Sales Comparison Approach
|
|
$
|
15,500,000
|
|
|
CRA examined and analyzed comparable
sales of five properties in the influencing market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sales reflected unadjusted sales
prices ranging from $42,460 to $71,759 per unit. After
adjustment, the comparable sales illustrated a value range of
$55,198 to $60,995 per unit, with mean and median adjusted sale
prices of $58,761 and $59,018 per unit, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The three comparable sales which
required the least adjustment were accorded most significance in
the analysis. Adjusted sales prices for these properties ranged
from $58,594 to $60,000 per unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRA estimated a value of $59,000 per
unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied to Twin Lakes Apartments
262 units, this resulted in CRAs total value estimate
for Twin Lakes Apartments of approximately $15,500,000.
|
F-1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31,
2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 0-24497
AIMCO Properties,
L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100 Denver, Colorado (Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
84-1275621 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
80237 (Zip Code)
|
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(303) 757-8101
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
Not applicable
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Partnership Common Units
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. Yes þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 24, 2010, there were 124,342,598 Partnership
Common Units outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of Apartment Investment and Management Companys
definitive proxy statement to be issued in conjunction with
Apartment Investment and Management Companys annual
meeting of stockholders to be held April 26, 2010, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual
Report.
G-1
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
G-2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides
a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in
certain circumstances. Certain information included in this
Annual Report contains or may contain information that is
forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities
laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding the
effect of acquisitions and redevelopments, our future financial
performance, including our ability to maintain current or meet
projected occupancy, rent levels and same store results, and the
effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ
materially from those described in these forward-looking
statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors, some of which are beyond our control,
including, without limitation: financing risks, including the
availability and cost of financing and the risk that our cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required
payments of principal and interest; earnings may not be
sufficient to maintain compliance with debt covenants; real
estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and
the general economic climate in the markets in which we operate
and competition for residents in such markets; national and
local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations
that affect us and interpretations of those regulations; the
competitive environment in which we operate; the timing of
acquisitions and dispositions; insurance risk, including the
cost of insurance; natural disasters and severe weather such as
hurricanes; litigation, including costs associated with
prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; energy
costs; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs,
fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary
remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or
previously owned by us. In addition, Aimcos current and
continuing qualification as a real estate investment trust
involves the application of highly technical and complex
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and depends on our
ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code, through actual operating results, distribution
levels and diversity of stock ownership. Readers should
carefully review our financial statements and the notes thereto,
as well as the section entitled Risk Factors
described in Item 1A of this Annual Report and the
other documents we file from time to time with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
PART I
The
Partnership
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or the
Partnership, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries,
was formed on May 16, 1994, to engage in the acquisition,
ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties.
Our securities include Partnership Common Units, or common
OP Units, Partnership Preferred Units, or preferred
OP Units, and High Performance Partnership Units, or High
Performance Units, which are collectively referred to as
OP Units. Apartment Investment and Management Company, or
Aimco, is the owner of our general partner, AIMCO-GP, Inc., or
the General Partner, and special limited partner,
AIMCO-LP
Trust, or the Special Limited Partner. The General Partner and
Special Limited Partner hold common OP Units and are the
primary holders of outstanding preferred OP Units.
Limited Partners refers to individuals or entities
that are our limited partners, other than Aimco, the General
Partner or the Special Limited Partner, and own common
OP Units or preferred OP Units. Generally, after
holding the common OP Units for one year, the Limited
Partners have the right to redeem their common OP Units for
cash, subject to our prior right to acquire some or all of the
common OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for
shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units
redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally
exchanged on a
one-for-one
basis (subject to antidilution adjustments). Preferred
OP Units and High Performance Units may or may not be
redeemable based on their respective terms, as provided for in
the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of AIMCO Properties, L.P. as amended, or the Partnership
Agreement.
We, through our operating divisions and subsidiaries, hold
substantially all of Aimcos assets and manage the daily
operations of Aimcos business and assets. Aimco is
required to contribute all proceeds from offerings of its
securities to us. In addition, substantially all of Aimcos
assets must be owned through the Partnership; therefore, Aimco
is generally required to contribute all assets acquired to us.
In exchange for the contribution of offering proceeds or assets,
Aimco receives additional interests in us with similar terms
(e.g., if Aimco contributes proceeds
G-3
of a preferred stock offering, Aimco (through the General
Partner and Special Limited Partner) receives preferred
OP Units with terms substantially similar to the preferred
stock issued by Aimco).
Aimco frequently consummates transactions for our benefit. For
legal, tax or other business reasons, Aimco may hold title or
ownership of certain assets until they can be transferred to us.
However, we have a controlling financial interest in
substantially all of Aimcos assets in the process of
transfer to us.
We own an equity interest in, and consolidate the majority of,
the properties in our owned real estate portfolio. These
properties represent the consolidated real estate holdings in
our financial statements, which we refer to as consolidated
properties. In addition, we have an equity interest in, but do
not consolidate for financial statement purposes, certain
properties that are accounted for under the equity or cost
methods. These properties represent our investment in
unconsolidated real estate partnerships in our financial
statements, which we refer to as unconsolidated properties.
Additionally, we provide property management and asset
management services to certain properties, and in certain cases,
we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the
operations of such properties through a partnership syndication
or other fund. Our equity holdings and managed properties are as
follows as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Consolidated properties
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
95,202
|
|
Unconsolidated properties
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
8,478
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
Asset management
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
29,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
135,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we had outstanding 122,509,304 common
OP Units, 28,096,618 preferred OP Units and 2,344,719
High Performance Units (see Note 11 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8). At December 31, 2009,
Aimco owned 116,479,791 of the common OP Units and
24,940,134 of the preferred OP Units.
Since Aimcos initial public offering in July 1994, we have
completed numerous transactions, including purchases of
properties and interests in entities that own or manage
properties, expanding our portfolio of owned or managed
properties from 132 properties with 29,343 apartment units to a
peak of over 2,100 properties with 379,000 apartment units. As
of December 31, 2009, our portfolio of owned
and/or
managed properties consists of 870 properties with 135,654
apartment units.
Except as the context otherwise requires, we,
our and us refer to the Partnership and
the Partnerships consolidated entities, collectively.
Except as the context otherwise requires, Aimco
refers to Aimco and Aimcos consolidated entities,
collectively. As used herein, and except where the context
otherwise requires, partnership refers to a limited
partnership or a limited liability company and
partner refers to a limited partner in a limited
partnership or a member in a limited liability company.
Available
Information
We do not maintain a website; however, Aimco does, and it makes
all of its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or SEC, available free of charge as soon as reasonably
practicable through its website at www.aimco.com. The
information contained on Aimcos website is not
incorporated into this Annual Report. We will furnish copies of
the Partnerships filings free of charge upon written
request to Aimcos corporate secretary.
Any materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site
(http://www.sec.gov)
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC.
G-4
Financial
Information About Industry Segments
We operate in two reportable segments: real estate (owning,
operating and redeveloping apartments) and investment management
(portfolio management and asset management, which are further
discussed in the Business Overview). For further information on
these segments, see Note 17 of the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis in Item 7.
Business
Overview
Our principal financial objective is to increase long-term OP
unitholder value, both as measured by Net Asset Value, which is
the estimated fair value of our assets, net of debt, or NAV, and
total unitholder return.
We strive to meet our objectives through:
|
|
|
|
|
property operations using scale and technology to
increase the effectiveness and efficiency of attracting and
retaining apartment residents;
|
|
|
|
|
|
portfolio management allocating capital among
geographic markets and apartment property types, primarily
Class B and B+ quality apartments that are well located
within the 20 largest U.S. markets, through sales,
redevelopment
and/or
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
managing our cost and risk of capital by using leverage that is
largely long-term, laddered in maturity, non-recourse and
property specific; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
reducing our general and administrative and certain other costs
through outsourcing and standardization.
|
Our business is organized around two core activities: Property
Operations and Investment Management. These core activities,
along with our financial strategy, are described in more detail
below.
Property
Operations
Our portfolio is comprised of two business components:
conventional and affordable. Our conventional operations, which
provide 88% of our property net operating income and are
market-rate apartments with rents paid by the resident, include
243 properties with 74,030 units. Our affordable operations
provide 12% of our property net operating income and consist of
260 properties with 29,650 units, with rents that are
generally paid, in whole or part, by a government agency.
Affordable properties tend to have relatively more stable rents
and higher occupancy due to government rent payments and thus
are much less affected by market fluctuations.
We operate a broad range of property types, from suburban
garden-style to urban high-rise properties in 44 states,
the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico at a range of average
monthly rental rates. On average, our portfolio rents are
somewhat above the average rents in the local markets. This
diversification in geography insulates us, to some degree, from
inevitable downturns in any one market.
Our property operations currently are organized into five areas,
which are further subdivided according to our target markets. To
manage our nationwide portfolio more efficiently and to increase
the benefits from our local management expertise, we have given
direct responsibility for operations within each area to an area
operations leader with regular senior management reviews. To
enable the area operations leaders to focus on sales and
service, as well as to improve financial control and budgeting,
we have dedicated an area financial officer to support each area
operations leader, and with the exception of routine
maintenance, our specialized Construction Services group manages
all on-site
improvements, thus reducing the need for the area operations
leaders to spend time on oversight of construction projects.
We seek to improve our oversight of property operations by:
developing better systems; standardizing business goals,
operational measurements and internal reporting; and enhancing
financial controls over field operations. Our objectives are to
focus on the areas discussed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Service. Our operating culture is
focused on our residents. Our goal is to provide our residents
with consistent service in clean, safe and attractive
communities. We evaluate our performance through a customer
satisfaction tracking system. In addition, we emphasize the
quality of our
on-site
employees
|
G-5
|
|
|
|
|
through recruiting, training and retention programs, which we
believe contributes to improved customer service and leads to
increased occupancy rates and enhanced operational performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resident Selection and Retention. In apartment
properties, neighbors are a meaningful part of the product,
together with the location of the property and the physical
quality of the apartment units. Part of our property operations
strategy is to focus on resident acquisition and
retention attracting and retaining credit-worthy
residents who are good neighbors. We have structured goals and
coaching for all of our sales personnel, a tracking system for
inquiries and a standardized renewal communication program. We
have standardized residential financial stability requirements
and have policies and monitoring practices to maintain our
resident quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Management. For our conventional
properties, we have a centralized revenue management system that
leverages people, processes and technology to work in
partnership with our area operational management teams to
develop rental rate pricing. We seek to increase revenue by
optimizing the balance between rental and occupancy rates. We
are also focused on the automation of
on-site
operations, as we believe that timely and accurate collection of
property performance and resident profile data will enable us to
maximize revenue through better property management and leasing
decisions. We have standardized policies for new and renewal
pricing with timely data and analyses by floor-plan, thereby
enabling us to maximize our ability to modify pricing, even in
challenging
sub-markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Expenses. Cost controls are
accomplished by local focus at the area level and by taking
advantage of economies of scale at the corporate level. As a
result of the size of our portfolio and our area concentrations
of properties, we have the ability to spread over a large
property base the fixed costs for general and administrative
expenditures and certain operating functions, such as
purchasing, insurance and information technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ancillary Services. We believe that our
ownership and management of properties provide us with unique
access to a customer base that allows us to provide additional
services and thereby increase occupancy and rents, while also
generating incremental revenue. We currently provide cable
television, telephone services, appliance rental, and carport,
garage and storage space rental at certain properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining and Improving Property Quality. We
believe that the physical condition and amenities of our
apartment properties are important factors in our ability to
maintain and increase rental rates. In 2009, we spent
$70.3 million (our share), or $723 per owned apartment
unit, for Capital Replacements, which represent the share of
additions that are deemed to replace the consumed portion of
acquired capital assets. Additionally, we spent
$53.4 million (our share), or $549 per owned apartment
unit, for Capital Improvements, which are non-redevelopment
capital additions that are made to enhance the value,
profitability or useful life of an asset from its original
purchase condition.
|
Investment
Management
Investment management includes activities related to our owned
portfolio of properties as well as services provided to
affiliated partnerships. Investment management includes
portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax
credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other
transaction activities. Within our owned portfolio, we refer to
these activities as Portfolio Management, and their benefit is
seen in property operating results and investment gains. For
affiliated partnerships, we refer to these activities as asset
management for which we are separately compensated through fees
paid by third party investors.
Portfolio
Management
Portfolio Management involves the ongoing allocation of
investment capital to meet our geographic and product type
goals. We target geographic balance in our diversified portfolio
in order to optimize risk-adjusted returns and to avoid the risk
of undue concentration in any particular market. We also seek to
balance the portfolio by product type, with both high quality
properties in excellent locations and also high land value
properties that support redevelopment activities. We intend to
slightly reduce our allocation of capital to affordable
properties to 10% of our NAV.
G-6
Our geographic allocation strategy focuses on our target markets
to reduce volatility in and our dependence on particular areas
of the country. We believe our target markets are deep,
relatively liquid and possess desirable long-term growth
characteristics. They are primarily coastal markets, and also
include a number of Sun Belt cities and Chicago, Illinois. We
may also invest in other markets on an opportunistic basis. We
intend to upgrade the quality of our portfolio through the sale
of approximately 5% to 10% of our portfolio annually, with the
proceeds generally used to increase our allocation of capital to
well located properties within our target markets through
capital investments, redevelopment or acquisitions. We expect
that increased geographic focus will also add to our investment
knowledge and increase operating efficiencies based on local
economies of scale.
Our portfolio management activities include strategic portfolio
and capital allocation decisions including transactions to buy,
sell or modify our ownership interest in properties, including
through the use of partnerships and joint ventures, and to
increase our investment in existing properties through
redevelopment. The purpose of these transactions is to adjust
our investments to reflect our decisions regarding target
allocations to geographic markets and to investment types.
We believe redevelopment of certain properties in superior
locations provides advantages over
ground-up
development, enabling us to generate rents comparable to new
properties with lower financial risk, in less time and with
reduced delays associated with governmental permits and
authorizations. Redevelopment work also includes seeking
entitlements from local governments, which enhance the value of
our existing portfolio by increasing density, that is, the right
to add residential units to a site. We have historically
undertaken a range of redevelopment projects: from those in
which a substantial number of all available units are vacated
for significant renovations to the property, to those in which
there is significant renovation, such as exteriors, common areas
or unit improvements, typically done upon lease expirations
without the need to vacate units on any wholesale or substantial
basis. We have a specialized Redevelopment and Construction
Services group to oversee these projects.
During 2009, we increased our allocation of capital to our
target markets by disposing of 68 conventional properties
located primarily outside of our target markets or in less
desirable locations within our target markets and by investing
$66.8 million in redevelopment of conventional properties.
As of December 31, 2009, our conventional portfolio
included 243 properties with 74,030 units in 38 markets. As
of December 31, 2009, conventional properties in our target
markets comprised 88% of our NAV attributable to our
conventional properties. Our top five markets by net operating
income contribution include the metropolitan areas of
Washington, D.C.; Los Angeles, California;
Other Florida (which is comprised of
Ft. Lauderdale, Jacksonville, Orlando, Palm Beach County
and Tampa); Chicago, Illinois and Boston, Massachusetts.
During 2009, we invested $46.0 million in redevelopment of
affordable properties, funded primarily by proceeds from the
sale of tax credits to institutional partners. As with
conventional properties, we also seek to dispose of properties
that are inconsistent with our long-term investment and
operating strategies. During 2009, we sold 22 properties from
our affordable portfolio. As of December 31, 2009, our
affordable portfolio included 260 properties with
29,650 units.
Financial
Strategy
We are focused on maintaining a safe balance sheet, including
minimizing or eliminating our recourse debt and near term
property debt maturities as well as minimizing our cost of
capital on a risk adjusted basis. We primarily use non-recourse
and amortizing property debt with laddered maturities and
minimize reliance on corporate debt. The lower risk inherent in
non-recourse property debt permits us to operate with higher
debt leverage and a lower weighted average cost of capital. We
use floating rate property and corporate debt to provide lower
interest costs over time at a level that considers acceptable
earnings volatility.
During 2009, using proceeds from asset dispositions, we repaid
$310.0 million of our term loan, which matures in March
2011, leaving a remaining outstanding balance of
$90.0 million at December 31, 2009. We repaid an
additional $45.0 million through February 26, 2010,
leaving a remaining outstanding balance of $45.0 million.
During 2009, we also focused on reducing refunding risk by
accelerating refinancing of property loans maturing prior to
2012. At the beginning of 2009, property debt totaling
$753.0 million was scheduled to mature prior to 2012.
During 2009, through refinancing, repayment and property sales,
we reduced these maturities by
G-7
69%, or $516.3 million, and eliminated all 2010 property
debt maturities. As of December 31, 2009, five loans
totaling $236.7 million were scheduled to mature in 2011.
During January 2010, we extended the maturity of one of these
loans for $65.0 million to 2013. We expect to refinance the
remaining four loans, totaling $171.7 million
($101.2 million our share), at their maturity.
As of December 31, 2009, we had a $180.0 million
revolving credit facility and borrowings available of
$136.2 million (after giving effect to $43.8 million
outstanding for undrawn letters of credit). The revolving credit
facility matures in May 2011 and has a one year extension
option, subject to certain terms.
Competition
In attracting and retaining residents to occupy our properties
we compete with numerous other housing alternatives. Our
properties compete directly with other rental apartments as well
as condominiums and single-family homes that are available for
rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are
located. Principal factors of competition include rent or price
charged, attractiveness of the location and property and quality
and breadth of services. The number of competitive properties
relative to demand in a particular area has a material effect on
our ability to lease apartment units at our properties and on
the rents we charge. In certain markets there exists oversupply
of single family homes and condominiums and a reduction of
households, both of which affect the pricing and occupancy of
our rental apartments. Additionally, we compete with other real
estate investors, including other apartment REITs, pension and
investment funds, partnerships and investment companies in
acquiring, redeveloping and managing apartment properties. This
competition affects our ability to acquire properties we want to
add to our portfolio and the price that we pay in such
acquisitions.
Taxation
We are treated as a pass-through entity for United
States Federal income tax purposes and are not subject to United
States Federal income taxation. Each of our partners, however,
is subject to tax on his allocable share of partnership tax
items, including partnership income, gains, losses, deductions
and credits, or Partnership Tax Items, for each taxable year
during which he is a partner, regardless of whether he receives
any actual distributions of cash or other property from us
during the taxable year. Generally, the characterization of any
particular Partnership Tax Item is determined by us, rather than
at the partner level, and the amount of a partners
allocable share of such item is governed by the terms of the
Partnership Agreement. The General Partner is our tax
matters partner for United States Federal income tax
purposes. The tax matters partner is authorized, but not
required, to take certain actions on behalf of us with respect
to tax matters.
Regulation
General
Apartment properties and their owners are subject to various
laws, ordinances and regulations, including those related to
real estate broker licensing and regulations relating to
recreational facilities such as swimming pools, activity centers
and other common areas. Changes in laws increasing the potential
liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or
increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions,
as well as changes in laws affecting development, construction
and safety requirements, may result in significant unanticipated
expenditures, which would adversely affect our net income and
cash flows from operating activities. In addition, future
enactment of rent control or rent stabilization laws, such as
legislation that has been considered in New York, or other laws
regulating multifamily housing may reduce rental revenue or
increase operating costs in particular markets.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or
operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal
or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a
property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to
whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for,
the release or presence of the hazardous substances. In
connection with the ownership, operation and management of
properties, we could potentially be liable for environmental
liabilities or costs associated with our properties or
properties we acquire or
G-8
manage in the future. These and other risks related to
environmental matters are described in more detail in
Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Insurance
Our primary lines of insurance coverage are property, general
liability, and workers compensation. We believe that our
insurance coverages adequately insure our properties against the
risk of loss attributable to fire, earthquake, hurricane,
tornado, flood, terrorism and other perils, and adequately
insure us against other risk. Our coverage includes deductibles,
retentions and limits that are customary in the industry. We
have established loss prevention, loss mitigation, claims
handling, litigation management and loss reserving procedures to
manage our exposure.
Employees
At December 31, 2009, we had approximately
3,500 employees, of which approximately 2,800 were at the
property level, performing various
on-site
functions, with the balance managing corporate and area
operations, including investment and debt transactions, legal,
financial reporting, accounting, information systems, human
resources and other support functions. As of December 31,
2009, unions represented 115 of our employees. We have never
experienced a work stoppage and believe we maintain satisfactory
relations with our employees.
The risk factors noted in this section and other factors noted
throughout this Annual Report, describe certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
Our
existing and future debt financing could render us unable to
operate, result in foreclosure on our properties, prevent us
from making distributions on our equity or otherwise adversely
affect our liquidity.
We are subject to the risk that our cash flow from operations
will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and
interest, and the risk that existing indebtedness may not be
refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as
favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If we fail to
make required payments of principal and interest on secured
debt, our lenders could foreclose on the properties and other
collateral securing such debt, which would result in loss of
income and asset value to us. As of December 31, 2009,
substantially all of the properties that we owned or controlled
were encumbered by debt. Our organizational documents do not
limit the amount of debt that we may incur, and we have
significant amounts of debt outstanding. Payments of principal
and interest may leave us with insufficient cash resources to
operate our properties or pay distributions required to be paid
in order to maintain Aimcos qualification as a REIT.
Our strategy is generally to incur debt to increase the return
on our capital while maintaining acceptable coverage ratios. For
the year ended December 31, 2009, as calculated based on
the provisions in our credit agreement, which is further
discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8, we had a ratio of earnings before
interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization to debt
service of 1.59:1 and a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of
1.36:1. On February 3, 2010, we and our lenders agreed to
reduce the covenant ratios of earnings before interest, taxes
and depreciation and amortization to debt service and earnings
to fixed charges from 1.50:1 and 1.30:1, respectively, to 1.40:1
and 1.20:1, respectively. We expect to remain in compliance with
these covenants.
At December 31, 2009, we had swap positions with two
financial institutions totaling $353.1 million. The related
swap agreements provide for collateral calls to maintain
specified
loan-to-value
ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties
serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be
required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap
agreements, which would adversely affect our cash flows.
G-9
Disruptions
in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain
financing and the cost of available financing and could
adversely affect our liquidity.
Our ability to obtain financing and the cost of such financing
depends on the overall condition of the United States
credit markets and, to an important extent in 2009, on the level
of involvement of certain government sponsored entities,
specifically, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie
Mac, and Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae,
in secondary credit markets. During 2009, the United States
credit markets (outside of multi-family) experienced significant
liquidity disruptions, which caused the spreads on debt
financings to widen considerably and made obtaining financing,
both non-recourse property debt and corporate borrowings, such
as our term loan or revolving credit facility, more difficult.
Further or prolonged disruptions in the credit markets could
result in Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae reducing their level of
involvement in secondary credit markets, which would adversely
affect our ability to obtain non-recourse property debt
financing. Additionally, further or prolonged disruptions in the
credit markets may also affect our ability to renew our credit
facility with similar commitments when it matures in May 2012
(inclusive of a one year extension option).
If our ability to obtain financing is adversely affected, we may
be unable to satisfy scheduled maturities on existing financing
through other sources of liquidity, which could result in lender
foreclosure on the properties securing such debt and loss of
income and asset value, each of which would adversely affect our
liquidity.
Increases
in interest rates would increase our interest expense and reduce
our profitability.
As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately
$654.6 million of variable-rate indebtedness outstanding
and $67.0 million of variable rate preferred OP Units
outstanding. Of the total debt subject to variable interest
rates, floating rate tax-exempt bond financing was about
two-thirds, or $433.9 million. Floating rate tax-exempt
bond financing is benchmarked against the Securities Industry
and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index, or
SIFMA, rate, which since 1989 has averaged 73% of the
30-day LIBOR
rate. At December 31, 2009, we had approximately
$440.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash and notes receivable, the majority of which bear interest.
The effect of our interest-bearing assets would partially reduce
the effect of an increase in variable interest rates. If this
historical relationship continues, we estimate that an increase
in 30-day
LIBOR of 100 basis points (73 basis points for
tax-exempt interest rates) with constant credit risk spreads
would result in net income being reduced by $1.1 million
and income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders being reduced by $1.6 million on an annual
basis.
Failure
to generate sufficient net operating income may adversely affect
our liquidity, limit our ability to fund necessary capital
expenditures or adversely affect our ability to pay
distributions.
Our ability to fund necessary capital expenditures on our
properties depends on, among other things, our ability to
generate net operating income in excess of required debt
payments. If we are unable to fund capital expenditures on our
properties, we may not be able to preserve the competitiveness
of our properties, which could adversely affect our net
operating income.
Our ability to make payments to our investors depends on our
ability to generate net operating income in excess of required
debt payments and capital expenditure requirements. Our net
operating income and liquidity may be adversely affected by
events or conditions beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the general economic climate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an inflationary environment in which the costs to operate and
maintain our properties increase at a rate greater than our
ability to increase rents only upon renewal of existing leases
or at the inception of new leases;
|
|
|
|
|
|
competition from other apartment communities and other housing
options;
|
|
|
|
|
|
local conditions, such as loss of jobs, unemployment rates or an
increase in the supply of apartments, that might adversely
affect apartment occupancy or rental rates;
|
G-10
|
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of
compliance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due
to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by
increased rents;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of
rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily
housing; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.
|
Increases
in inflation or jobless rates could adversely affect our results
of operations and liquidity.
In an inflationary environment, the costs to operate and
maintain our properties may increase, although we may increase
rents upon renewal of existing leases or at the inception of new
leases. However, if we are unable to increase rents at levels
commensurate with the increases in operating costs, our results
of operations and liquidity would be adversely affected. If
unemployment rates rise or remain at elevated levels, we may not
be able to raise rental rates at our properties, which, coupled
with inflationary pressures discussed above, could adversely
affect our results of operations and liquidity.
Covenant
restrictions may limit our ability to make payments to our
investors.
Some of our debt and other securities contain covenants that
restrict our ability to make distributions or other payments to
our investors unless certain financial tests or other criteria
are satisfied. Our credit facility provides, among other things,
that we may make distributions to our investors during any four
consecutive fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount that does not
exceed the greater of 95% of our Funds From Operations for such
period, subject to certain non-cash adjustments, or such amount
as may be necessary to maintain Aimcos REIT status. Our
outstanding classes of preferred OP Units prohibit the
payment of distributions on our common OP Units if we fail
to pay the distributions to which the holders of the preferred
OP Units are entitled.
Because
real estate investments are relatively illiquid, we may not be
able to sell properties when appropriate.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and cannot
always be sold quickly. Our freedom to sell properties is also
restricted by REIT tax rules applicable to Aimco. Thus, we may
not be able to change our portfolio promptly in response to
changes in economic or other market conditions. Our ability to
dispose of assets in the future will depend on prevailing
economic and market conditions, including the cost and
availability of financing. This could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Competition
could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or
maintain rents.
Our apartment properties compete for residents with other
housing alternatives, including other rental apartments,
condominiums and single-family homes that are available for
rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family
homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in a particular
area could adversely affect our ability to lease apartments and
to increase or maintain rental rates. The current challenges in
the credit and housing markets have increased housing inventory
that competes with our apartment properties.
Our
subsidiaries may be prohibited from making distributions and
other payments to us.
All of our properties are owned, and all of our operations are
conducted, by us and our subsidiaries. As a result, we depend on
distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries in order
to satisfy our financial obligations and make payments to our
investors. The ability of our subsidiaries to make such
distributions and other payments depends on their earnings and
cash flows and may be subject to statutory or contractual
limitations. As an equity investor in our subsidiaries, our
right to receive assets upon their liquidation or reorganization
will be effectively subordinated to the claims of their
creditors. To the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of
such subsidiaries, our claims may still be subordinate to any
security interest in or other lien on their assets and to any of
their debt or other obligations that are senior to our claims.
G-11
Redevelopment
and construction risks could affect our
profitability.
We intend to continue to redevelop certain of our properties.
These activities are subject to the following risks:
|
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining,
necessary zoning, occupancy, or other required governmental or
third party permits and authorizations, which could result in
increased costs or the delay or abandonment of opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may incur costs that exceed our original estimates due to
increased material, labor or other costs such as litigation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to complete construction and lease up of a
property on schedule, resulting in increased construction and
financing costs and a decrease in expected rental revenues;
|
|
|
|
|
|
occupancy rates and rents at a property may fail to meet our
expectations for a number of reasons, including changes in
market and economic conditions beyond our control and the
development by competitors of competing communities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain financing with favorable terms, or at
all, for the proposed development of a property, which may cause
us to delay or abandon an opportunity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may abandon opportunities that we have already begun to
explore for a number of reasons, including changes in local
market conditions or increases in construction or financing
costs, and, as a result, we may fail to recover expenses already
incurred in exploring those opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may incur liabilities to third parties during the
redevelopment process, for example, in connection with resident
lease terminations, or managing existing improvements on the
site prior to resident lease terminations; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss of a key member of a project team could adversely affect
our ability to deliver redevelopment projects on time and within
our budget.
|
We are
insured for certain risks, and the cost of insurance, increased
claims activity or losses resulting from casualty events may
affect our operating results and financial
condition.
We are insured for a portion of our consolidated
properties exposure to casualty losses resulting from
fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood and other perils,
which insurance is subject to deductibles and self-insurance
retention. We recognize casualty losses or gains based on the
net book value of the affected property and any related
insurance proceeds. In many instances, the actual cost to repair
or replace the property may exceed its net book value and the
amount of any insurance proceeds. We also insure certain
unconsolidated properties for a portion of their exposure to
such losses. With respect to our consolidated properties, we
recognize the uninsured portion of losses as part of casualty
losses in the periods in which they are incurred. In addition,
we are self-insured for a portion of our exposure to third-party
claims related to our employee health insurance plans,
workers compensation coverage and general liability
exposure. With respect to our insurance obligations to
unconsolidated properties and our exposure to claims of third
parties, we establish reserves at levels that reflect our known
and estimated losses. The ultimate cost of losses and the impact
of unforeseen events may vary materially from recorded reserves,
and variances may adversely affect our operating results and
financial condition. We purchase insurance (or reinsurance where
we insure unconsolidated properties) to reduce our exposure to
losses and limit our financial losses on large individual risks.
The availability and cost of insurance are determined by market
conditions outside our control. No assurance can be made that we
will be able to obtain and maintain insurance at the same levels
and on the same terms as we do today. If we are not able to
obtain or maintain insurance in amounts we consider appropriate
for our business, or if the cost of obtaining such insurance
increases materially, we may have to retain a larger portion of
the potential loss associated with our exposures to risks.
Natural
disasters and severe weather may affect our operating results
and financial condition.
Natural disasters and severe weather such as hurricanes may
result in significant damage to our properties. The extent of
our casualty losses and loss in operating income in connection
with such events is a function of the severity
G-12
of the event and the total amount of exposure in the affected
area. When we have geographic concentration of exposures, a
single catastrophe (such as an earthquake) or destructive
weather event (such as a hurricane) affecting a region may have
a significant negative effect on our financial condition and
results of operations. We cannot accurately predict natural
disasters or severe weather, or the number and type of such
events that will affect us. As a result, our operating and
financial results may vary significantly from one period to the
next. Although we anticipate and plan for losses, there can be
no assurance that our financial results will not be adversely
affected by our exposure to losses arising from natural
disasters or severe weather in the future that exceed our
previous experience and assumptions.
We
depend on our senior management.
Our success depends upon the retention of our senior management,
including Terry Considine, Aimcos chief executive officer.
We have a succession planning and talent development process
that is designed to identify potential replacements and develop
our team members to provide depth in the organization and a
bench of talent on which to draw. However, there are no
assurances that we would be able to find qualified replacements
for the individuals who make up our senior management if their
services were no longer available. The loss of services of one
or more members of our senior management team could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. We do not currently maintain key-man life
insurance for any of our employees.
If we
are not successful in our acquisition of properties, our results
of operations could be adversely affected.
The selective acquisition of properties is a component of our
strategy. However, we may not be able to complete transactions
successfully in the future. Although we seek to acquire
properties when such acquisitions increase our net income, Funds
From Operations or net asset value, such transactions may fail
to perform in accordance with our expectations. In particular,
following acquisition, the value and operational performance of
a property may be diminished if obsolescence or neighborhood
changes occur before we are able to redevelop or sell the
property.
We may
be subject to litigation associated with partnership
transactions that could increase our expenses and prevent
completion of beneficial transactions.
We have engaged in, and intend to continue to engage in, the
selective acquisition of interests in partnerships controlled by
us that own apartment properties. In some cases, we have
acquired the general partner of a partnership and then made an
offer to acquire the limited partners interests in the
partnership. In these transactions, we may be subject to
litigation based on claims that we, as the general partner, have
breached our fiduciary duty to our limited partners or that the
transaction violates the relevant partnership agreement or state
law. Although we intend to comply with our fiduciary obligations
and the relevant partnership agreements, we may incur additional
costs in connection with the defense or settlement of this type
of litigation. In some cases, this type of litigation may
adversely affect our desire to proceed with, or our ability to
complete, a particular transaction. Any litigation of this type
could also have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations.
Government
housing regulations may limit the opportunities at some of our
properties and failure to comply with resident qualification
requirements may result in financial penalties and/or loss of
benefits, such as rental revenues paid by government
agencies.
We own consolidated and unconsolidated equity interests in
certain properties and manage other properties that benefit from
governmental programs intended to provide housing to people with
low or moderate incomes. These programs, which are usually
administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, or HUD, or state housing finance agencies,
typically provide mortgage insurance, favorable financing terms,
tax-credit equity, or rental assistance payments to the property
owners. As a condition of the receipt of assistance under these
programs, the properties must comply with various requirements,
which typically limit rents to pre-approved amounts and impose
restrictions on resident incomes. Failure to comply with these
requirements and restrictions may result in financial penalties
or loss of benefits. We usually need to obtain the approval of
HUD in order to
G-13
acquire or dispose of a significant interest in or manage a
HUD-assisted property. We may not always receive such approval.
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, for continuing operations, our
rental revenues include $140.3 million, $132.3 million
and $121.4 million, respectively, of subsidies from
government agencies. Any loss of such benefits would adversely
affect our liquidity and results of operations.
Laws
benefiting disabled persons may result in our incurrence of
unanticipated expenses.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all
places intended to be used by the public are required to meet
certain Federal requirements related to access and use by
disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of
1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied
after March 13, 1990, to be accessible to the handicapped.
These and other Federal, state and local laws may require
modifications to our properties, or affect renovations of the
properties. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the
imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants
and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying
feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures.
Although we believe that our properties are substantially in
compliance with present requirements, we may incur unanticipated
expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA in connection with
the ongoing operation or redevelopment of our properties.
Potential
liability or other expenditures associated with potential
environmental contamination may be costly.
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or
operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal
or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a
property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew
of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the
hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage
or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to
sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs
associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by
government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by
such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous
substances on a property could result in claims by private
plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other
infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of
removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through
a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges
for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is
potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose
liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal
ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with
the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could
potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs
associated with our properties or properties we acquire or
manage in the future.
Moisture
infiltration and resulting mold remediation may be
costly.
We have been named as a defendant in lawsuits that have alleged
personal injury and property damage as a result of the presence
of mold. In addition, we are aware of lawsuits against owners
and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of
personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of
mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary
judgments or settlements. We have only limited insurance
coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the
presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold
exposure. We have implemented policies, procedures, third-party
audits and training, and include a detailed moisture intrusion
and mold assessment during acquisition due diligence. We believe
these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure from our
properties and will minimize the effects that mold may have on
our residents. To date, we have not incurred any material costs
or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate
mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and
subject to change, we can make no assurance that liabilities
resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have
a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
G-14
Aimcos
failure to qualify as a REIT would place us in default under our
primary credit facilities.
Aimco believes it operates, and has always operated, in a manner
that enables it to meet the requirements for qualification as a
REIT for Federal income tax purposes. However, Aimcos
current and continuing qualification as a REIT depends on its
ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Code,
which are related to organizational structure, distribution
levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain restrictions
with regard to owned assets and categories of income. These
requirements are complex and accordingly there can be no
assurances that the Internal Revenue Service will not contend
that Aimco has violated provisions of the Code and fails to
qualify as a REIT. If Aimco fails to qualify as a REIT, we would
then be in default under our primary credit facilities.
REIT
distribution requirements limit our available
cash.
As a REIT, Aimco is subject to annual distribution requirements.
As Aimcos operating partnership, we pay distributions
intended to enable Aimco to satisfy these distribution
requirements. This limits the amount of cash we have available
for other business purposes, including amounts to fund growth.
Aimcos
charter and Maryland law may limit the ability of a third party
to acquire control of Aimco and, therefore, the
Partnership.
A third party is not likely to make an offer to acquire the
Partnership unless that third party is also acquiring control of
Aimco. The 8.7% ownership limit in Aimcos charter may have
the effect of delaying or precluding acquisition of control of
Aimco by a third party without the consent of Aimcos board
of directors. Aimcos charter authorizes its board of
directors to issue up to 510,587,500 shares of capital
stock. As of December 31, 2009, 426,157,736 shares
were classified as Aimco Class A Common Stock, of which
116,479,791 were outstanding, and 84,429,764 shares were
classified as preferred stock, of which 24,950,134 were
outstanding. Under Aimcos charter, its board of directors
has the authority to classify and reclassify any of Aimcos
unissued shares of preferred stock into shares of capital stock
with such preferences, conversion or other rights, voting power
restrictions, limitation as to dividends, qualifications or
terms or conditions of redemptions as Aimcos board of
directors may determine. The authorization and issuance of a new
class of capital stock could have the effect of delaying or
preventing someone from taking control of Aimco, even if a
change in control was in the best interests of Aimcos
stockholders or the Partnerships Limited Partners.
The
Maryland General Corporation Law may limit the ability of a
third party to acquire control of Aimco and, therefore, the
Partnership.
As noted above, a third party is not likely to make an offer to
acquire the Partnership unless that third party is also
acquiring control of Aimco. As a Maryland corporation, Aimco is
subject to various Maryland laws that may have the effect of
discouraging offers to acquire Aimco and of increasing the
difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if an
acquisition would be in the best interests of Aimcos
stockholders or the Limited Partners. The Maryland General
Corporation Law, specifically the Maryland Business Combination
Act, restricts mergers and other business combination
transactions between Aimco and any person who acquires directly
or indirectly beneficial ownership of shares of Aimcos
stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without prior
approval of Aimcos board of directors. Any such business
combination transaction could not be completed until five years
after the person acquired such voting power, and generally only
with the approval of stockholders representing 80% of all votes
entitled to be cast and
662/3%
of the votes entitled to be cast, excluding the interested
stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. The Maryland
General Corporation Law, specifically the Maryland Control Share
Acquisition Act, provides generally that a person who acquires
shares of Aimcos capital stock representing 10% or more of
the voting power in electing directors will have no voting
rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the shares
eligible to vote. Additionally, the Maryland General Corporation
Law provides, among other things, that the board of directors
has broad discretion in adopting stockholders rights plans
and has the sole power to fix the record date, time and place
for special meetings of the stockholders. To date, Aimco has not
G-15
adopted a shareholders rights plan. In addition, the
Maryland General Corporation Law provides that corporations that:
|
|
|
|
|
have at least three directors who are not officers or employees
of the entity or related to an acquiring person; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
has a class of equity securities registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
|
may elect in their charter or bylaws or by resolution of the
board of directors to be subject to all or part of a special
subtitle that provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
the corporation will have a staggered board of directors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any director may be removed only for cause and by the vote of
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of
directors generally, even if a lesser proportion is provided in
the charter or bylaws;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of directors may only be set by the board of
directors, even if the procedure is contrary to the charter or
bylaws;
|
|
|
|
|
|
vacancies may only be filled by the remaining directors, even if
the procedure is contrary to the charter or bylaws; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the secretary of the corporation may call a special meeting of
stockholders at the request of stockholders only on the written
request of the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority
of all the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting, even if the
procedure is contrary to the charter or bylaws.
|
To date, Aimco has not made any of the elections described
above. However, these provisions of Maryland law could have the
effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of
Aimco, even if a change in control was in the best interests of
Aimcos stockholders or the Partnerships Limited
Partners.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
Our portfolio includes garden style, mid-rise and high-rise
properties located in 44 states, the District of Columbia
and Puerto Rico. Our geographic allocation strategy focuses on
target markets which are grouped by region below. The following
table sets forth information on all of our properties as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Conventional:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
10,274
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
10,504
|
|
Northeast
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
18,270
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
21,221
|
|
Sunbelt
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
23,546
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
31,481
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4,633
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total target markets
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
56,723
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
68,761
|
|
Opportunistic and other markets
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
17,307
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
25,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total conventional owned and managed
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
74,030
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
94,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affordable owned and managed
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
29,650
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
32,836
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
Asset management
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
29,879
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
32,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
135,654
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
162,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we owned an equity interest in and
consolidated 426 properties containing 95,202 apartment units,
which we refer to as consolidated properties. These
consolidated properties contain, on average, 223 apartment
units, with the largest property containing 2,113 apartment
units. These properties offer residents a
G-16
range of amenities, including swimming pools, clubhouses, spas,
fitness centers and tennis courts. Many of the apartment units
offer features such as vaulted ceilings, fireplaces, washer and
dryer
hook-ups,
cable television, balconies and patios. Additional information
on our consolidated properties is contained in
Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated
Depreciation in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
At December 31, 2009, we held an equity interest in and did
not consolidate 77 properties containing 8,478 apartment units,
which we refer to as unconsolidated properties. In
addition, we provided property management services for 22
properties containing 2,095 apartment units, and asset
management services for 345 properties containing 29,879
apartment units. In certain cases, we may indirectly own
generally less than one percent of the economic interest in such
properties through a partnership syndication or other fund.
Substantially all of our consolidated properties are encumbered
by property debt. At December 31, 2009, our consolidated
properties classified as held for use in our consolidated
balance sheet were encumbered by aggregate property debt
totaling $5,547.3 million having an aggregate weighted
average interest rate of 5.50%. Such property debt was
collateralized by 412 properties with a combined net book value
of $6,868.3 million. Included in the 412 properties,
we had a total of 31 property loans on 15 properties, with an
aggregate principal balance outstanding of $366.1 million,
that were each collateralized by property and
cross-collateralized with certain (but not all) other property
loans within this group of property loans (see Note 6 of
the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for
additional information about our property debt).
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of 2009.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
There is no public market for the OP Units, and we do not
intend to list the OP Units on any securities exchange. In
addition, the Partnership Agreement restricts the
transferability of OP Units. The following table sets forth
the distributions declared per common OP Unit in each
quarterly period during the two years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
3.88
|
(1)
|
September 30
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
(1)
|
June 30
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2008, we declared special distributions which were paid
part in cash and part in common OP Units issued to Aimco as
further discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8. These special distributions were in
connection with special dividends declared by Aimcos board
of directors to address taxable gains from 2008 property sales. |
Aimcos board of directors determines and declares
Aimcos dividends. In making a dividend determination,
Aimcos board of directors considers a variety of factors,
including: REIT distribution requirements; current market
conditions; liquidity needs and other uses of cash, such as for
deleveraging and accretive investment activities. Aimcos
board of directors may adjust the dividend amount or the
frequency with which the dividend is paid based on then
prevailing facts and circumstances. We intend for our
distributions to be consistent with Aimcos dividends.
G-17
On February 24, 2010, there were 124,342,598 common
OP Units outstanding, held by 2,440 unitholders of
record.
Our Partnership Agreement generally provides that after holding
the common OP Units for one year, our Limited Partners have
the right to redeem their common OP Units for cash, subject
to our prior right to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the
common OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for
shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units
redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally
exchanged on a
one-for-one
basis (subject to antidilution adjustments).
During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009,
approximately 379,400 and 518,800 common OP Units were
redeemed in exchange for an equal number of shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock, respectively. During the three and
twelve months ended December 31, 2009, no preferred
OP Units were redeemed in exchange for shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock. The following table summarizes
repurchases of our equity securities for the three months ended
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Purchased
|
|
|
of Units that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
Fiscal Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Unit
|
|
|
or Programs(1)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
October 1 October 31, 2009
|
|
|
25,026
|
|
|
$
|
14.33
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 1 November 30, 2009
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
14.34
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 1 December 31, 2009
|
|
|
31,224
|
|
|
|
13.86
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
57,002
|
|
|
$
|
14.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The terms of our Partnership Agreement do not provide for a
maximum number of units that may be repurchased, and other than
the express terms of our Partnership Agreement, we have no
publicly announced plans or programs of repurchase. However,
whenever Aimco repurchases its Class A Common Stock, it is
expected that Aimco will fund the repurchase with a concurrent
repurchase by us of common OP Units held by Aimco at a price per
unit that is equal to the price per share paid for the
Class A Common Stock. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aimcos board of directors has, from time to time,
authorized Aimco to repurchase shares of Class A Common
Stock. There were no repurchases of Aimcos equity
securities during the year ended December 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2009, Aimco was authorized to repurchase
approximately 19.3 million additional shares. This
authorization has no expiration date. These repurchases may be
made from time to time in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions. |
Distribution
Payments
Our Credit Agreement includes customary covenants, including a
restriction on distributions and other restricted payments, but
permits distributions during any four consecutive fiscal
quarters in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of our Funds From
Operations for such period, subject to certain non-cash
adjustments, or such amount as may be necessary for Aimco to
maintain its REIT status.
G-18
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following selected financial data is based on our audited
historical financial statements. This information should be read
in conjunction with such financial statements, including the
notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included herein or in previous filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008(1)(2)
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2005(2)
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
OPERATING DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,195,763
|
|
|
$
|
1,243,170
|
|
|
$
|
1,174,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,084,552
|
|
|
$
|
894,060
|
|
Total operating expenses(3)
|
|
|
(1,085,250
|
)
|
|
|
(1,185,071
|
)
|
|
|
(989,658
|
)
|
|
|
(909,784
|
)
|
|
|
(751,516
|
)
|
Operating income(3)
|
|
|
110,513
|
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
184,799
|
|
|
|
174,768
|
|
|
|
142,544
|
|
Loss from continuing operations(3)
|
|
|
(196,217
|
)
|
|
|
(117,092
|
)
|
|
|
(45,360
|
)
|
|
|
(39,965
|
)
|
|
|
(30,640
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net(4)
|
|
|
152,237
|
|
|
|
744,880
|
|
|
|
171,615
|
|
|
|
329,947
|
|
|
|
160,450
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(43,980
|
)
|
|
|
627,788
|
|
|
|
126,255
|
|
|
|
289,982
|
|
|
|
129,810
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(22,442
|
)
|
|
|
(155,749
|
)
|
|
|
(92,138
|
)
|
|
|
(92,917
|
)
|
|
|
(49,064
|
)
|
Net income attributable to preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(56,854
|
)
|
|
|
(61,354
|
)
|
|
|
(73,144
|
)
|
|
|
(90,527
|
)
|
|
|
(98,946
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
|
403,700
|
|
|
|
(43,508
|
)
|
|
|
104,592
|
|
|
|
(22,458
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and diluted(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.33
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
$
|
6,962,866
|
|
|
$
|
7,126,142
|
|
|
$
|
6,902,079
|
|
|
$
|
6,437,359
|
|
|
$
|
5,708,824
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
9,456,721
|
|
|
|
10,631,746
|
|
|
|
10,305,903
|
|
|
|
10,031,761
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
|
5,690,310
|
|
|
|
6,069,804
|
|
|
|
5,683,884
|
|
|
|
4,969,185
|
|
|
|
4,283,278
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
1,550,374
|
|
|
|
1,661,600
|
|
|
|
2,152,326
|
|
|
|
2,753,617
|
|
|
|
3,164,111
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common unit
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
Total consolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
95,202
|
|
|
|
117,719
|
|
|
|
153,758
|
|
|
|
162,432
|
|
|
|
158,548
|
|
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
8,478
|
|
|
|
9,613
|
|
|
|
10,878
|
|
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
|
35,269
|
|
Units managed (end of period)(6)
|
|
|
31,974
|
|
|
|
35,475
|
|
|
|
38,404
|
|
|
|
42,190
|
|
|
|
46,667
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2008, has been restated to reclassify
impairment losses on real estate development assets within
operating income. The reclassification reduced |
G-19
|
|
|
|
|
operating income by $91.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, and had no effect on the reported
amounts of loss from continuing operations, net income, net
income available to the Partnerships common unitholders or
earnings per unit. Additionally, the reclassification had no
effect on the consolidated balance sheets, statements of
partners capital or statements of cash flows. See Note 2
to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the
current financial statement presentation, including retroactive
adjustments related to our January 1, 2009 adoption of the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), or
SFAS 141(R), FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, or SFAS 160, and FASB Staff
Position No. EITF
03-6-1, or
FSP EITF
03-6-1 (see
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8) and to reflect additional properties sold
during 2009 or classified as held for sale as of
December 31, 2009, as discontinued operations (see
Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8). |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Total operating expenses, operating income and loss from
continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008,
include a $91.1 million pre-tax provision for impairment
losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed
further in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Income from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes
$221.8 million, $800.3 million, $117.6 million,
$337.3 million and $162.7 million in gains on
disposition of real estate, respectively. Income from
discontinued operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007 is discussed
further in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Weighted average common units, common OP unit equivalents,
dilutive preferred securities and earnings per unit amounts for
each of the periods presented above have been adjusted for our
application during the fourth quarter 2009 of a change in
accounting, which requires the units issued in our special
distributions paid in 2008 and January 2009 to be treated as
issued and outstanding on the distribution payment dates for
basic purposes and as potential unit equivalents for the periods
between the ex-dividend dates and payment dates for diluted
purposes, rather than treating the units as issued and
outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest period presented
for both basic and diluted purposes. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further
discussion of this accounting change. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Units managed represents units in properties for which we
provide asset management services only, although in certain
cases we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of
the economic interest in such properties through a partnership
syndication or other fund. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Executive
Overview
We are a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition,
ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties.
We are the operating partnership for Aimco, which is a
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust,
or REIT. Our property operations are characterized by
diversification of product, location and price point. We
primarily invest in the 20 largest U.S. markets, as
measured by total market capitalization, which is the total
market value of institutional-grade apartment properties in a
particular market. We define these markets as target
markets and they possess the following characteristics: a
high concentration of population and apartment units; geographic
and employment diversification; and historically strong returns
with reduced volatility as part of a diversified portfolio. We
are one of the largest owners and operators of apartment
properties in the United States. As of December 31, 2009,
we owned or managed 870 apartment properties containing
135,654 units located in 44 states, the District of
Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our primary sources of income and cash
are rents associated with apartment leases.
The key financial indicators that we use in managing our
business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating
performance are: NAV; Funds From Operations, or FFO; Adjusted
FFO, or AFFO, which is FFO less spending for Capital
Replacements; same store property operating results; net
operating income; Free Cash Flow, which is net operating income
less spending for Capital Replacements; financial coverage
ratios; and leverage as
G-20
shown on our balance sheet. FFO and Capital Replacements are
defined and further described in the sections captioned
Funds From Operations and Capital
Additions below. The key macro-economic factors and
non-financial indicators that affect our financial condition and
operating performance are: household formations; rates of job
growth; single-family and multifamily housing starts; interest
rates; and availability and cost of financing.
Because our operating results depend primarily on income from
our properties, the supply and demand for apartments influences
our operating results. Additionally, the level of expenses
required to operate and maintain our properties and the pace and
price at which we redevelop, acquire and dispose of our
apartment properties affect our operating results. Our cost of
capital is affected by the conditions in the capital and credit
markets and the terms that we negotiate for our equity and debt
financings.
During the challenging financial and economic environment in
2009, we focused on: serving and retaining residents;
continually improving our portfolio; reducing leverage and
financial risk; and simplifying our business model.
We are focused on owning and operating B/B+ quality apartments
concentrated in our target markets. We intend to upgrade the
quality of our portfolio through the sale of approximately 5% to
10% of our portfolio annually, with the proceeds generally used
to increase our allocation of capital to well located properties
within our target markets through capital investments,
redevelopment or acquisitions.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of our
operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction
with the accompanying consolidated financial statements in
Item 8.
Results
of Operations
Overview
2009
compared to 2008
We reported net loss attributable to the Partnership of
$66.4 million and net loss attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders of $123.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to net income
attributable to the Partnership of $472.0 million and net
income attributable to the Partnerships common unitholders
of $403.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, decreases of $538.4 million and $527.0 million,
respectively. These decreases were principally due to the
following items, all of which are discussed in further detail
below:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in income from discontinued operations, primarily
related to our sale of fewer assets in 2009 and the recognition
of gains on sales as compared to 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate
and other, primarily due to a large gain on the sale of an
interest in an unconsolidated real estate partnership in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily
related to completed redevelopments and capital additions placed
in service for partial periods during 2008 and 2009; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in asset management and tax credit revenues,
primarily due to a reduction in promote income, which is income
earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by
our consolidated joint ventures.
|
The effects of these items on our operating results were
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in earnings allocable to noncontrolling interests,
primarily due to a decrease in the noncontrolling
interests share of the decrease in gains on sales
discussed above;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in general and administrative expenses, primarily
related to reductions in personnel and related expenses from our
organizational restructuring activities during 2008 and
2009; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
impairment losses on real estate development assets in 2008, for
which no similar impairments were recognized in 2009.
|
G-21
2008
compared to 2007
We reported net income attributable to the Partnership of
$472.0 million and net income attributable to the
Partnerships Aimco common unitholders of
$403.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to net income attributable to the Partnership of
$34.1 million and net loss attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders of $43.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, increases of
$437.9 million and $447.2 million, respectively. These
increases were principally due to the following items, all of
which are discussed in further detail below:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in income from discontinued operations, primarily
related to an increase in the number of assets sold during 2008
and our recognition of higher gains on sales as compared to 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real
estate and other, primarily due to a large gain on the sale of
an interest in an unconsolidated real estate partnership in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income associated with property
operations, reflecting improved operations of our same store
properties and other properties; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in asset management and tax credit revenues,
primarily due to an increase in promote income, which is income
earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by
our consolidated joint ventures.
|
The effects of these items on our operating results were
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
impairment losses on real estate development assets in 2008, for
which no similar impairments were recognized in 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in earnings allocable to noncontrolling interests,
primarily due to an increase in the noncontrolling
interests share of the increase in gains on sales
discussed above;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily
related to completed redevelopments placed in service for
partial periods during 2007 or 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring costs recognized during the fourth quarter of
2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in provisions for losses on notes receivable,
primarily due to the impairment during 2008 of our interest in
Casden Properties LLC.
|
The following paragraphs discuss these and other items affecting
the results of our operations in more detail.
Business
Segment Operating Results
We have two reportable segments: real estate (owning, operating
and redeveloping apartments) and investment management
(portfolio management and asset management). Our chief operating
decision maker uses various generally accepted industry
financial measures to assess the performance and financial
condition of the business, including: NAV; FFO; AFFO; same store
property operating results; net operating income; Free Cash
Flow; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown on our
balance sheet. Our chief operating decision maker emphasizes net
operating income as a key measurement of segment profit or loss.
Segment net operating income is generally defined as segment
revenues less direct segment operating expenses.
Real
Estate Segment
Our real estate segment involves the ownership and operation of
properties that generate rental and other property-related
income through the leasing of apartment units. Our real estate
segments net operating income also includes income from
property management services performed for unconsolidated
partnerships and unrelated parties.
G-22
The following table summarizes our real estate segments
net operating income for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Real estate segment revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
$
|
1,140,828
|
|
|
$
|
1,137,995
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,779
|
|
Property management revenues, primarily from affiliates
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
6,345
|
|
|
|
6,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145,910
|
|
|
|
1,144,340
|
|
|
|
1,100,702
|
|
Real estate segment expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
521,161
|
|
|
|
526,238
|
|
|
|
503,890
|
|
Property management expenses
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
6,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524,030
|
|
|
|
531,623
|
|
|
|
510,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate segment net operating income
|
|
$
|
621,880
|
|
|
$
|
612,717
|
|
|
$
|
590,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, real estate segment net operating
income increased $9.2 million, or 1.5%. This increase was
due to an increase in real estate segment revenues of
$1.6 million, or 0.1% and a decrease in real estate segment
expenses of $7.6 million, or 1.4%.
The increase in revenues from our real estate segment during the
year ended December 31, 2009, was primarily attributed to
an increase of $10.0 million in revenues related to our
conventional redevelopment properties based on more units in
service at these properties in 2009, $7.5 million in
revenues related to our affordable properties, primarily due to
higher average rents partially offset by lower physical
occupancy during 2009, and $2.3 million of revenues related
to properties acquired during the latter half of 2008. These
increases were partially offset by a $14.8 million, or
2.0%, decrease in revenues from our conventional same store
properties, due to a decrease of 50 basis points in average
physical occupancy and lower average rent (approximately $23 per
unit). Conventional same store property revenues in our target
markets, which represented approximately 78% of our total
conventional same store revenues, decreased by 2.7% due to
decreases in average physical occupancy (80 basis points)
and average rent (approximately $31 per unit). The decrease in
revenues associated with these target markets were primarily
attributed to revenue decreases of 4.9% in our Pacific markets,
attributed to 140 basis points in lower occupancy and $73
per unit in lower rents, and 3.3% in our Sunbelt market,
attributed to 40 basis points in lower occupancy and $35
per unit in lower rents. Conventional same store revenues
related to our other markets decreased by 1.7%, due to
130 basis points in lower occupancy and $14 per unit in
lower rents.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, the decrease in our real estate
segment expenses was primarily attributed to property management
expenses. Property management expenses related to our
consolidated properties, which are shown in the table above as a
component of property operating expenses, decreased by
$8.2 million, and property management expenses related to
our unconsolidated properties decreased by $2.5 million,
both due primarily to reductions in personnel and related costs
resulting from our organizational restructurings. These
decreases in our real estate segment expenses were partially
offset by increases of $0.6 million related to our
conventional same store properties, primarily due to increases
in employee compensation, insurance, repair and maintenance, and
real estate tax expenses, offset by decreases in administrative
and marketing expenses, $0.6 million related to our
conventional redevelopment properties, primarily due to more
units placed in service, $0.5 million related to our
affordable properties, primarily due to properties that were
newly consolidated in 2008 and $0.8 million related to
properties acquired during the latter half of 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, real estate segment net operating
income increased $22.6 million, or 3.8%. This increase was
due to an increase in real estate segment revenues of
$43.6 million, or 4.0%, offset by an increase in real
estate segment expenses of $21.1 million, or 4.1%.
The increase in revenues from our real estate segment during the
year ended December 31, 2008, was primarily attributed to
an increase of $19.8 million in revenues from our
conventional same store properties, due to an increase of
80 basis points in average physical occupancy and higher
average rent (approximately $18 per unit), $13.0 million
G-23
in revenues related to our affordable properties, primarily due
to newly consolidated properties, and $8.8 million in
revenues related to our conventional redevelopment properties
based on more units in service and higher rental rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, the increase in expense was
primarily attributed to increases of $9.3 million related
to our affordable properties, primarily due to properties that
were newly consolidated, $5.2 million related to our
conventional redevelopment properties, primarily due to more
units placed in service, $3.1 million of property
management expenses related to consolidated properties, which
are shown in the table above as a component of property
operating expenses, and $0.2 million related to our
conventional same store properties, primarily due to increases
in utilities and real estate taxes, offset by decreases in
employee compensation, repairs and maintenance, and turnover
expenses. These increases in property expenses were in addition
to an increase of $4.2 million in casualty losses during
2008, primarily related to properties damaged by Tropical Storm
Fay and Hurricane Ike.
Investment
Management Segment
Our investment management segment includes activities and
services related to our owned portfolio of properties as well as
services provided to affiliated partnerships. Activities and
services that fall within investment management include
portfolio strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax
credit syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other
transaction activities. Within our owned portfolio, we refer to
these activities as Portfolio Management, and their
benefit is seen in property operating results and in investment
gains. For affiliated partnerships, we refer to these activities
as asset management, for which we are separately compensated
through fees paid by third party investors. The expenses of this
segment consist primarily of the costs of departments that
perform these activities. These activities are conducted in part
by our taxable subsidiaries, and the related net operating
income may be subject to income taxes.
Asset management revenue includes certain fees that were earned
in a prior period, but not recognized at that time because
collectibility was not reasonably assured. Those fees may be
recognized in a subsequent period upon occurrence of a
transaction or a high level of the probability of occurrence of
a transaction, or improvement in operations that generates
sufficient cash to pay the fees.
The following table summarizes the net operating income from our
investment management segment for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
$
|
52,193
|
|
|
$
|
101,225
|
|
|
$
|
73,755
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
24,784
|
|
|
|
20,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment segment net operating income
|
|
$
|
36,414
|
|
|
$
|
76,441
|
|
|
$
|
53,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, net operating income from
investment management decreased $40.0 million, or 52.4%.
This decrease is primarily attributable to a $42.8 million
decrease in promote income, which is income earned in connection
with the disposition of properties owned by our consolidated
joint ventures, due to fewer related sales in 2009 and a
$7.6 million decrease in other general partner
transactional fees, partially offset by a $9.0 million
decrease in investment management expenses, primarily due to
reductions in personnel and related costs from our
organizational restructurings and a reduction in transaction
costs, and a $3.9 million increase in revenues associated
with our affordable housing tax credit syndication business,
including syndication fees and other revenue earned in
connection with these arrangements.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, net operating income from
investment management increased $23.2 million, or 43.6%.
This increase is primarily attributable to a $30.7 million
increase in promote income, which is income earned in connection
with the disposition of properties owned by our consolidated
joint ventures, and a $9.2 million increase in other
general partner transactional fees. These increases are offset
by a decrease of $7.4 million in asset management fees, a
decrease of $5.0 million in revenues associated with our
affordable housing tax credit syndication business, including
syndication fees and
G-24
other revenue earned in connection with these arrangements, and
an increase of $4.3 million in investment management
expenses, inclusive of $3.5 million in deferred acquisition
costs.
Other
Operating Expenses (Income)
Depreciation
and Amortization
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, depreciation and amortization
increased $51.4 million, or 13.1%. This increase primarily
consists of depreciation related to properties acquired during
the latter part of 2008, completed redevelopments and other
capital projects recently placed in service.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, depreciation and amortization
increased $45.5 million, or 13.1%. This increase reflects
depreciation of $65.3 million for newly acquired
properties, completed redevelopments and other capital projects
recently placed in service. This increase was partially offset
by a decrease of $25.7 million in depreciation adjustments
necessary to reduce the carrying amount of buildings and
improvements to their estimated disposition value, or zero in
the case of a planned demolition, primarily due to a property
that became fully depreciated during 2007.
Provision
for Operating Real Estate Impairment Losses
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization,
unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize
an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2007, we
recognized impairment losses of $2.3 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, related to properties
classified as held for use as of December 31, 2009. We
recognized no such impairment losses during the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Provision
for Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development
Assets
In connection with the preparation of our 2008 annual financial
statements, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in
our Lincoln Place property, located in Venice, California. Based
upon the decline in land values in Southern California during
2008 and the expected timing of our redevelopment efforts, we
determined that the total carrying amount of the property was no
longer probable of full recovery and, accordingly, during the
three months ended December 31, 2008, recognized an
impairment loss of $85.4 million ($55.6 million net of
tax).
Similarly, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in
Pacific Bay Vistas (formerly Treetops), a vacant property
located in San Bruno, California, and determined that the
carrying amount of the property was no longer probable of full
recovery and, accordingly, we recognized an impairment loss of
$5.7 million for this property during the three months
ended December 31, 2008.
The impairments discussed above totaled $91.1 million and
are included in provisions for impairment losses on real estate
development assets in our consolidated statement of income for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8.
We recognized no similar impairments on real estate development
assets during the years ended December 31, 2009 or 2007.
General
and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative
expenses decreased $29.6 million, or 29.8%. This decrease
is primarily attributable to reductions in personnel and related
expenses associated with our organizational restructurings (see
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8), pursuant to which we eliminated approximately 400,
or 36%, of our offsite positions between December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2009.
G-25
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, general and administrative
expenses increased $8.5 million, or 9.4%. This increase is
primarily attributable to higher personnel and related expenses
of $6.1 million and an increase of $1.5 million in
information technology communications costs.
Other
Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net includes franchise taxes, risk management
activities, partnership administration expenses and certain
non-recurring items.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, other expenses, net decreased by
$4.7 million. The decrease is primarily attributable to a
$5.4 million write-off during 2008 of certain
communications hardware and capitalized costs in 2008, and a
$5.3 million reduction in expenses of our self insurance
activities, including a decrease in casualty losses on less than
wholly owned properties from 2008 to 2009. These decreases are
partially offset by an increase of $4.3 million in costs
related to certain litigation matters.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, other expenses, net increased by
$3.2 million. The increase includes a $5.4 million
write-off of certain communications hardware and capitalized
costs during 2008 and a $1.2 million write-off of
redevelopment costs associated with a change in the planned use
of a property during 2008. The net unfavorable change also
reflects $3.6 million of income recognized in 2007 related
to the transfer of certain property rights to an unrelated
party. These increases were partially offset by a
$3.7 million reduction in expenses of our self insurance
activities (net of costs in 2008 related to Tropical Storm Fay
and Hurricane Ike) and a net decrease of $1.7 million in
costs related to certain litigation matters.
Restructuring
Costs
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized
restructuring costs of $11.2 million, as compared to
$22.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2008,
related to our organizational restructurings, which are further
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8. We recognized no restructuring costs
during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest
Income
Interest income consists primarily of interest on notes
receivable from non-affiliates and unconsolidated real estate
partnerships, interest on cash and restricted cash accounts, and
accretion of discounts on certain notes receivable from
unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Transactions that
result in accretion occur infrequently and thus accretion income
may vary from period to period.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, interest income decreased
$10.5 million, or 50.9%. Interest income decreased by
$8.7 million due to lower interest rates on notes
receivable, cash and restricted cash balances and lower average
balances and by $4.1 million due to a decrease in accretion
income related to our note receivable from Casden Properties LLC
for which we ceased accretion following impairment of the note
in 2008. These decreases were partially offset by a
$2.3 million increase in accretion income related to other
notes during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting
from a change in the timing and amount of collection.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2007, interest income decreased
$23.3 million, or 52.9%. Interest income decreased by
$16.0 million due to lower interest rates on notes
receivable, cash and restricted cash balances and lower average
balances. Interest income also decreased by $5.8 million
due to an adjustment of accretion on certain discounted notes
during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting from a
change in the estimated timing and amount of collection, and by
$1.5 million for accretion income recognized during the
year ended December 31, 2007, related to the prepayment of
principal on certain discounted loans collateralized by
properties in West Harlem in New York City.
G-26
Provision
for Losses on Notes Receivable
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized net provisions for losses on notes receivable of
$21.5 million, $17.6 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. The provisions for losses on notes receivable for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, primarily
consist of impairments related to our investment in Casden
Properties LLC, which are discussed further below.
As part of the March 2002 acquisition of Casden Properties,
Inc., we invested $50.0 million for a 20% passive interest
in Casden Properties LLC, an entity organized to acquire,
re-entitle and develop land parcels in Southern California.
Based upon the profit allocation agreement, we account for this
investment as a note receivable and through 2008 were amortizing
the discounted value of the investment to the $50.0 million
previously estimated to be collectible, through January 2,
2009, the initial dissolution date of the entity. In 2009, the
managing member extended the dissolution date. In connection
with the preparation of our 2008 annual financial statements and
as a result of a decline in land values in Southern California,
we determined our recorded investment amount was not fully
recoverable, and accordingly recognized an impairment loss of
$16.3 million ($10.0 million net of tax) during the
three months ended December 31, 2008. In connection with
the preparation of our 2009 annual financial statements and as a
result of continued declines in land values in Southern
California, we determined our then recorded investment amount
was not fully recoverable, and accordingly recognized an
impairment loss of $20.7 million ($12.4 million net of
tax) during the three months ended December 31, 2009.
In addition to the impairments related to Casden Properties LLC
discussed above, we recognized provisions for losses on notes
receivable totaling $0.8 million, $1.3 million and
$2.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Interest
Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, interest expense, which includes the amortization of
deferred financing costs, totaled $324.2 million and
$324.1 million, respectively. Interest expense increased by
$15.0 million due to a reduction in redevelopment activity
during 2009, which resulted in a reduction in capitalized
interest. In addition, interest expense increased by
$1.2 million due to an increase in prepayment penalties
associated with refinancing activities, from $2.8 million
in 2008 to $4.0 million in 2009, and by $3.3 million
related to non-recourse property loans, from $311.2 million
to $314.5 million, primarily due to higher average interest
rates partially offset by lower average balances during 2009.
These increases in interest expense were substantially offset by
decreases in corporate interest expense. Interest expense
related to corporate debt, which is primarily floating rate,
decreased by $19.4 million, from $34.8 million to
$15.4 million, primarily due to lower average balances and
interest rates during 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, interest expense increased
$11.1 million, or 3.5%. Interest expense related to
non-recourse property loans increased by $17.1 million,
from $294.1 million to $311.2 million, primarily due
to higher average balances partially offset by lower average
interest rates during 2008. In addition, interest expense
increased by $4.4 million, due to a decrease in capitalized
interest from $29.1 million in 2007 to $24.7 million
in 2008, resulting from more units in service and lower interest
rates. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
interest expense related to corporate debt, which is primarily
floating rate and which decreased by $10.4 million, from
$45.2 million to $34.8 million, primarily due to lower
average balances and interest rates during 2008.
Equity
in Losses of Unconsolidated Real Estate
Partnerships
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships
includes our share of net losses of our unconsolidated real
estate partnerships and is primarily driven by depreciation
expense in excess of the net operating income recognized by such
partnerships.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate
partnerships of $12.0 million, $4.6 million and
$3.3 million, respectively. The $7.4 million increase
in our equity in losses from 2008 to 2009 was primarily due to
our sale in late 2008 of an interest in an unconsolidated real
estate partnership that generated $3.0 million of equity in
earnings during the year ended December 31, 2008,
G-27
and our sale during 2009 of our interest in an unconsolidated
group purchasing organization which resulted in a decrease of
equity in earnings of approximately $1.2 million. The
increase in equity in losses also includes additional losses
recognized during 2009 related to the underlying investment
properties of certain tax credit syndications we consolidated
during 2009 and 2008.
Impairment
Losses Related to Unconsolidated Real Estate
Partnerships
Impairment losses related to unconsolidated real estate
partnerships includes our share of impairment losses recognized
by our unconsolidated real estate partnerships. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008, impairment losses related to
unconsolidated real estate partnerships decreased
$2.3 million, and for the year ended December 31,
2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007,
impairment losses related to unconsolidated real estate
partnerships increased $2.7 million. This decrease and
increase are primarily attributable to impairment losses
recognized by unconsolidated partnerships on their underlying
real estate properties during 2008.
Gain
on Dispositions of Unconsolidated Real Estate and
Other
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
includes our share of gains related to dispositions of real
estate by unconsolidated real estate partnerships, gains on
disposition of interests in unconsolidated real estate
partnerships, gains on dispositions of land and other
non-depreciable assets and costs related to asset disposal
activities. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period
to period reflect the changing level of disposition activity
from period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold
are determined on an individual property basis or in the
aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a single
transaction, and are not comparable period to period.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, gain on dispositions of
unconsolidated real estate and other decreased
$77.4 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to a
gain of $98.4 million on our disposition in 2008 of
interests in two unconsolidated real estate partnerships. This
decrease was partially offset by $18.7 million of gains on
the disposition of interests in unconsolidated partnerships
during 2009. Gains recognized in 2009 consist of
$8.6 million related to our receipt in 2009 of additional
proceeds related to our disposition during 2008 of one of the
partnership interests discussed above (see Note 3 to the
consolidated financials statements in Item 8),
$4.0 million from the disposition of our interest in a
group purchasing organization (see Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8), and
$6.1 million from our disposition in 2009 of interests in
unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, gain on dispositions of
unconsolidated real estate and other increased
$75.4 million. This increase is primarily attributable to a
$98.4 million net gain on the disposition of interests in
two unconsolidated real estate partnerships during the year
ended December 31, 2008. During 2007, we recognized a
$6.0 million non-refundable option and extension fee
resulting from the termination of rights under an option
agreement to sell the North and Central towers of our Flamingo
South Beach property, approximately $6.4 million of net
gains on dispositions of land parcels and our share of gains on
dispositions of properties by unconsolidated real estate
partnerships in 2007, and a $10.6 million gain on debt
extinguishment related to properties in the VMS partnership (see
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8).
Income
Tax Benefit
In conjunction with Aimcos UPREIT structure, certain of
our operations, or a portion thereof, such as property
management, asset management and risk management, are conducted
through, and certain of our properties are owned by, taxable
subsidiaries. Income taxes related to the results of continuing
operations of our taxable subsidiaries are included in income
tax benefit in our consolidated statements of income.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, income tax benefit decreased by
$34.5 million. This decrease was primarily attributed to
$36.1 million of income tax benefit recognized in 2008
related to the impairments of our Lincoln Place property and our
investment in Casden
G-28
Properties LLC, both of which are owned through taxable
subsidiaries, partially offset by $8.1 million of income
tax benefit recognized in 2009 related to the impairment of our
investment in Casden Properties LLC.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, income tax benefit increased by
$33.4 million. This increase was primarily attributed to
$36.1 million of income tax benefit recognized in 2008
related to the impairments of our Lincoln Place property and our
investment in Casden Properties LLC.
Income
from Discontinued Operations, Net
The results of operations for properties sold during the period
or designated as held for sale at the end of the period are
generally required to be classified as discontinued operations
for all periods presented. The components of net earnings that
are classified as discontinued operations include all
property-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation
expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale,
property-specific interest expense and debt extinguishment gains
and losses to the extent there is secured debt on the property.
In addition, any impairment losses on assets held for sale and
the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of properties held
for sale are reported in discontinued operations.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, income from
discontinued operations totaled $152.2 million and
$744.9 million, respectively. The $592.7 million
decrease in income from discontinued operations was principally
due to a $541.2 million decrease in gain on dispositions of
real estate, net of income taxes, primarily attributable to
fewer properties sold in 2009 as compared to 2008, and a
$111.8 million decrease in operating income (inclusive of a
$27.1 million increase in real estate impairment losses),
partially offset by a $58.8 million decrease in interest
expense.
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, income from
discontinued operations totaled $744.9 million and
$171.6 million, respectively. The $573.3 million
increase in income from discontinued operations was principally
due to a $641.7 million increase in gain on dispositions of
real estate, net of income taxes, primarily attributable to more
properties sold in 2008 as compared to 2007 and a
$27.9 million decrease in interest expense. These increases
were partially offset by a $66.1 million decrease in
operating income (inclusive of a $22.0 million increase in
real estate impairment losses) and a $31.6 million decrease
related to a 2007 gain on debt extinguishment related to
properties in the VMS partnership.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we sold 89
consolidated properties for gross proceeds of $1.3 billion
and net proceeds of $432.7 million, resulting in a net gain
on sale of approximately $216.0 million (which is net of
$5.8 million of related income taxes). During the year
ended December 31, 2008, we sold 151 consolidated
properties for gross proceeds of $2.4 billion and net
proceeds of $1.1 billion, resulting in a net gain on sale
of approximately $757.2 million (which is net of
$43.1 million of related income taxes). During the year
ended December 31, 2007, we sold 73 consolidated properties
for gross proceeds of $480.0 million and net proceeds of
$203.8 million, resulting in a net gain on sale of
approximately $115.5 million (which is net of
$2.1 million of related income taxes).
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
income from discontinued operations includes the operating
results of the properties sold or classified as held for sale as
of December 31, 2009.
Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period
reflect the changing level of our disposition activity from
period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are
determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate
for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction,
and are not comparable period to period (see Note 13 of the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional
information on discontinued operations).
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships reflects the non-Aimco partners, or
noncontrolling partners, share of operating results of
consolidated real estate partnerships. This generally includes
the noncontrolling partners share of property management
fees, interest on notes and other amounts eliminated in
consolidation that we charge to such partnerships. As discussed
in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 160, which
are now codified in the Financial Accounting Standards
G-29
Boards Accounting Standards Codification, or FASB ASC,
Topic 810, effective January 1, 2009. Prior to our adoption
of SFAS 160, we generally did not recognize a benefit for
the noncontrolling interest partners share of partnership
losses for partnerships that have deficit noncontrolling
interest balances and we generally recognized a charge to our
earnings for distributions paid to noncontrolling partners for
partnerships that had deficit noncontrolling interest balances.
Under the updated provisions of FASB ASC Topic 810, we are
required to attribute losses to noncontrolling interests even if
such attribution would result in a deficit noncontrolling
interest balance and we are no longer required to recognize a
charge to our earnings for distributions paid to noncontrolling
partners for partnerships that have deficit noncontrolling
interest balances.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, net earnings attributed to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships decreased by $133.3 million. This decrease is
primarily attributable to a reduction of $108.7 million
related to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated real
estate partnerships share of gains on dispositions of real
estate, due primarily to fewer sales in 2009 as compared to
2008, $5.5 million of losses allocated to noncontrolling
interests in 2009 that we would not have allocated to the
noncontrolling interest partners in 2008 because to do so would
have resulted in deficits in their noncontrolling interest
balances, and approximately $3.8 million related to deficit
distribution charges recognized as a reduction to our earnings
in 2008, for which we did not recognize similar charges in 2009
based on the change in accounting discussed above. These
decreases are in addition to the noncontrolling interest
partners share of increased losses of our consolidated
real estate partnerships in 2009 as compared to 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, net income attributed to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships increased by $63.6 million. This increase is
primarily attributable to an increase of $106.5 million
related to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated real
estate partnerships share of gains on dispositions of real
estate, due primarily to more sales in 2008 as compared to 2007,
partially offset by increases of $42.9 million in net
recoveries of deficit distributions.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8, during the first quarter 2010, we
will adopt new accounting guidance related to accounting for
variable interest entities. This change in accounting guidance
may result in our consolidation of certain previously
unconsolidated entities as well as our deconsolidation of
certain we currently consolidate. At this time, we have not yet
determined the effect this accounting change will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, or GAAP, which requires us to make estimates
and assumptions. We believe that the following critical
accounting policies involve our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization,
unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize
an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property.
From time to time, we have non-revenue producing properties that
we hold for future redevelopment. We assess the recoverability
of the carrying amount of these redevelopment properties by
comparing our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows based
on the expected service potential of the redevelopment property
upon completion to the carrying amount. In certain instances, we
use a probability-weighted approach to determine our estimate of
undiscounted future cash flows when alternative courses of
action are under consideration. As discussed in Provision for
Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development Assets within
the preceding discussion of our Results of Operations, during
2008 we recognized impairment losses on our Lincoln Place and
Pacific Bay Vistas properties of $85.4 million
($55.6 million net of tax) and $5.7 million,
respectively.
G-30
Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of risk.
Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance
and value of our real estate investments. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the general economic climate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
competition from other apartment communities and other housing
options;
|
|
|
|
|
|
local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the
supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment
occupancy or rental rates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of
compliance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due
to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by
increased rents;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of
rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily
housing; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.
|
Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an
impairment in our long-lived assets, including real estate and
investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships. In
addition to the impairments of Lincoln Place and Pacific Bay
Vistas discussed above, based on periodic tests of
recoverability of long-lived assets, for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2007, we recorded net impairment
losses of $2.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively,
related to properties classified as held for use, and during the
year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded no additional
impairments related to properties held for use.
Notes
Receivable and Interest Income Recognition
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships
consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which
we are the general partner. Notes receivable from non-affiliates
consist of notes receivable from unrelated third parties. The
ultimate repayment of these notes is subject to a number of
variables, including the performance and value of the underlying
real estate and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders. Our
notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry at
the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as
par value notes, and loans extended by predecessors,
some of whose positions we generally acquired at a discount,
which we refer to as discounted notes.
We record interest income on par value notes as earned in
accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We
discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes
are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise
significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We
record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost recovery
method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the recorded
amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts are
recognized as income.
We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable
based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both
probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be
probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has closed
transactions or has entered into certain pending transactions
(which include real estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and
rights offerings) that provide a reliable source of repayment.
In such instances, we recognize accretion income, on a
prospective basis using the effective interest method over the
estimated remaining term of the loans, equal to the difference
between the carrying amount of the discounted notes and the
estimated collectible value. We record income on all other
discounted notes using the cost recovery method. Accretion
income recognized in any given period is based on our ability to
complete transactions to monetize the notes receivable and the
difference between the carrying value and the estimated
collectible amount of the notes; therefore, accretion income
varies on a period by period basis and could be lower or higher
than in prior periods.
Provision
for Losses on Notes Receivable
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic
basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of
cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether
estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and
interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note.
We recognize impairments on
G-31
notes receivable when it is probable that principal and
interest will not be received in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loan. The amount of the impairment to be recognized
generally is based on the fair value of the partnerships
real estate that represents the primary source of loan
repayment. In certain instances where other sources of cash flow
are available to repay the loan, the impairment is measured by
discounting the estimated cash flows at the loans original
effective interest rate.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we
recorded net provisions for losses on notes receivable of
$21.5 million, $17.6 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. As discussed in Provision for Losses on Notes
Receivable within the preceding discussion of our Results of
Operations, provisions for losses on notes receivable in 2009
and 2008 include impairment losses of $20.7 million
($12.4 million net of tax) and $16.3 million
($10.0 million net of tax), respectively, on our investment
in Casden Properties LLC, which we account for as a note
receivable. We will continue to evaluate the collectibility of
these notes, and we will adjust related allowances in the future
due to changes in market conditions and other factors.
Capitalized
Costs
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred
in connection with our capital additions activities, including
redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property
improvements and replacements of existing property components.
Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated
with time spent by site employees in connection with the
planning, execution and control of all capital additions
activities at the property level. We characterize as
indirect costs an allocation of certain department
costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate
levels that clearly relate to capital additions activities. We
capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods
in which redevelopment and construction projects are in
progress. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not
relate to capital additions activities, including ordinary
repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and
administrative expenses (see Capital Additions and Related
Depreciation in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8).
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, for
continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized
$9.8 million, $25.7 million and $30.8 million of
interest costs, respectively, and $40.0 million,
$78.1 million and $78.1 million of site payroll and
indirect costs, respectively. The reduction is primarily due to
a reduced level of redevelopment activities.
Funds
From Operations
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when
considered with the financial statements determined in
accordance with GAAP, is helpful to investors in understanding
our performance because it captures features particular to real
estate performance by recognizing that real estate generally
appreciates over time or maintains residual value to a much
greater extent than do other depreciable assets such as
machinery, computers or other personal property. The Board of
Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as net income (loss), computed in
accordance with GAAP, excluding gains from sales of depreciable
property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures
are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We compute FFO
for all periods presented in accordance with the guidance set
forth by NAREITs April 1, 2002, White Paper, which we
refer to as the White Paper. We calculate FFO attributable to
the Partnerships common unitholders (diluted) by
subtracting redemption or repurchase related preferred
OP Unit issuance costs and distributions on preferred
OP Units and adding back distributions on dilutive
preferred securities and premiums or discounts on preferred
OP Unit redemptions or repurchases. FFO should not be
considered an alternative to net income or net cash flows from
operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, as
an indication of our performance or as a measure of liquidity.
FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund
future cash needs. In addition, although FFO is a measure used
for comparability in assessing the performance of REITs, there
can be no assurance that our basis for computing FFO is
comparable with that of other REITs.
G-32
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, our
FFO is calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships
common unitholders(1)
|
|
$
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
403,700
|
|
|
$
|
(43,508
|
)
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
444,413
|
|
|
|
392,999
|
|
|
|
347,491
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to non-real estate assets
|
|
|
(16,667
|
)
|
|
|
(17,372
|
)
|
|
|
(20,159
|
)
|
Depreciation of rental property related to noncontrolling
partners and unconsolidated entities(2)
|
|
|
(40,852
|
)
|
|
|
(29,872
|
)
|
|
|
(15,888
|
)
|
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
(22,494
|
)
|
|
|
(99,864
|
)
|
|
|
(24,470
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit) arising from disposition of
unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Add back portion of gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real
estate and other that relates to non-depreciable assets and debt
extinguishment gain
|
|
|
7,783
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
17,956
|
|
Deficit distributions to noncontrolling partners(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,211
|
|
|
|
29,210
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on dispositions of real estate, net of noncontrolling
partners interest(2)
|
|
|
(164,281
|
)
|
|
|
(617,906
|
)
|
|
|
(63,923
|
)
|
Depreciation of rental property, net of noncontrolling
partners interest(2)
|
|
|
45,836
|
|
|
|
109,043
|
|
|
|
114,586
|
|
(Recovery of deficit distributions) deficit distributions to
noncontrolling partners, net(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,354
|
)
|
|
|
9,550
|
|
Income tax expense arising from disposals
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
43,146
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Preferred OP Unit distributions
|
|
|
58,503
|
|
|
|
62,836
|
|
|
|
70,509
|
|
Preferred OP Unit redemption related (gains) costs
|
|
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
Amounts allocable to participating securities(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO
|
|
$
|
194,686
|
|
|
$
|
249,306
|
|
|
$
|
430,588
|
|
Preferred OP Unit distributions
|
|
|
(58,503
|
)
|
|
|
(62,836
|
)
|
|
|
(70,509
|
)
|
Preferred OP Unit redemption related gains (costs)
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
Amounts allocable to participating securities(4)
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
(6,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
Distributions on dilutive preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders diluted
|
|
$
|
137,040
|
|
|
$
|
185,259
|
|
|
$
|
354,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common units, common unit
equivalents and dilutive preferred securities outstanding(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units and equivalents(6)(7)
|
|
|
124,442
|
|
|
|
99,386
|
|
|
|
106,802
|
|
Dilutive preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
124,442
|
|
|
|
100,876
|
|
|
|
107,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the numerator for calculating basic earnings per
common unit in accordance with GAAP (see Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Noncontrolling partners refers to noncontrolling
partners in our consolidated real estate partnerships. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Prior to adoption of SFAS 160 (see Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8), we recognized
deficit distributions to noncontrolling partners as charges in
our income statement when cash was distributed to a
noncontrolling partner in a consolidated partnership in excess
of the positive balance in such partners |
G-33
|
|
|
|
|
noncontrolling interest balance. We recorded these charges for
GAAP purposes even though there was no economic effect or cost.
Deficit distributions to noncontrolling partners occurred when
the fair value of the underlying real estate exceeded its
depreciated net book value because the underlying real estate
had appreciated or maintained its value. As a result, the
recognition of expense for deficit distributions to
noncontrolling partners represented, in substance, either
(a) our recognition of depreciation previously allocated to
the noncontrolling partner or (b) a payment related to the
noncontrolling partners share of real estate appreciation.
Based on White Paper guidance that requires real estate
depreciation and gains to be excluded from FFO, we added back
deficit distributions and subtracted related recoveries in our
reconciliation of net income to FFO. Subsequent to our adoption
of SFAS 160, effective January 1, 2009, we may reduce
the balance of noncontrolling interests below zero in such
situations and we are no longer required to recognize such
charges in our income statement. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Amounts allocable to participating securities represent
distributions declared and any amounts of undistributed earnings
allocable to participating securities. See Note 2 and
Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 for further information regarding participating
securities. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Weighted average common units, common unit equivalents, dilutive
preferred securities for each of the periods presented above
have been adjusted for our application during the fourth quarter
2009 of a change in GAAP, which requires the common OP units
issued to Aimco in connection with our special distributions
paid in 2008 and January 2009 to be treated as issued and
outstanding on the distribution payment dates for basic purposes
and as potential unit equivalents for the periods between the
ex-dividend dates and the payment dates for diluted purposes,
rather than treating the units as issued and outstanding as of
the beginning of the earliest period presented for both basic
and diluted purposes. The change in accounting treatment had no
effect on diluted weighted average units outstanding for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The change in accounting
treatment reduced diluted weighted average units outstanding by
32.9 million and 46.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Represents the denominator for earnings per common
unit diluted, calculated in accordance with GAAP,
plus common OP unit equivalents that are dilutive for FFO. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
had 6,534,140, 7,191,199, and 7,367,400 common OP Units
outstanding and 2,344,719, 2,367,629 and 2,379,084 High
Performance Units outstanding. |
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial
obligations. Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from
our operations. Additional sources are proceeds from property
sales and proceeds from refinancings of existing property loans
and borrowings under new property loans.
Our principal uses for liquidity include normal operating
activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding
debt, capital additions, distributions paid to unitholders and
distributions paid to noncontrolling interest partners,
repurchases of common OP Units from Aimco in connection
with Aimcos concurrent repurchase of its Class A
Common Stock, and acquisitions of, and investments in,
properties. We use our cash and cash equivalents and our cash
provided by operating activities to meet short-term liquidity
needs. In the event that our cash and cash equivalents and cash
provided by operating activities are not sufficient to cover our
short-term liquidity demands, we have additional means, such as
short-term borrowing availability and proceeds from property
sales and refinancings, to help us meet our short-term liquidity
demands. We may use our revolving credit facility for general
corporate purposes and to fund investments on an interim basis.
We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as
debt maturities and property acquisitions, through long-term
borrowings, primarily secured, the issuance of equity securities
(including OP Units), the sale of properties and cash
generated from operations.
The state of credit markets and related effect on the overall
economy may have an adverse affect on our liquidity, both
through increases in interest rates and credit risk spreads, and
access to financing. As further discussed in Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, we
are subject to interest rate risk associated with certain
variable rate liabilities, preferred stock and assets. Based on
our net variable rate liabilities, preferred OP Units and
assets outstanding at December 31, 2009, we estimate that a
1.0% increase in
30-day LIBOR
with constant credit risk spreads would reduce our income
attributable to the Partnerships common
G-34
unitholders by approximately $1.6 million on an annual
basis. Although base interest rates have generally decreased
relative to their levels prior to the disruptions in the
financial markets, the tightening of credit markets has affected
the credit risk spreads charged over base interest rates on, and
the availability of, property loan financing. For future
refinancing activities, our liquidity and cost of funds may be
affected by increases in base interest rates or higher credit
risk spreads. If timely property financing options are not
available for maturing debt, we may consider alternative sources
of liquidity, such as reductions in certain capital spending or
proceeds from asset dispositions.
As further discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 8, we use total rate of return
swaps as a financing product to lower our cost of borrowing
through conversion of fixed rate tax-exempt bonds payable and
fixed rate notes payable to variable interest rates indexed to
the SIFMA rate for tax-exempt bonds payable and the
30-day LIBOR
rate for notes payable, plus a credit risk spread. The cost of
financing through these arrangements is generally lower than the
fixed rate on the debt. As of December 31, 2009, we had
total rate of return swap positions with two financial
institutions with notional amounts totaling $353.1 million.
Swaps with notional amounts of $307.9 million and
$45.2 million had maturity dates in May 2012 and October
2012, respectively.
The total rate of return swaps require specified
loan-to-value
ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties
serving as collateral under these agreements decline or if we
sell properties in the collateral pool with low
loan-to-value
ratios, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries have an
obligation to pay down the debt or provide additional collateral
pursuant to the swap agreements, which may adversely affect our
cash flows. The obligation to provide collateral is limited to
these subsidiaries and is non-recourse to us. At
December 31, 2009, these subsidiaries were not required to
provide cash collateral based on the
loan-to-value
ratios of the real estate properties serving as collateral under
these agreements.
We periodically evaluate counterparty credit risk associated
with these arrangements. At the current time, we have concluded
we do not have material exposure. In the event a counterparty
were to default under these arrangements, loss of the net
interest benefit we generally receive under these arrangements,
which is equal to the difference between the fixed rate we
receive and the variable rate we pay, may adversely affect our
operating cash flows.
See Derivative Financial Instruments in Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for
additional discussion of these arrangements, including the
current swap maturity dates.
As of December 31, 2009, the amount available under our
$180.0 million revolving credit facility was
$136.2 million (after giving effect to $43.8 million
outstanding for undrawn letters of credit). Our total
outstanding term loan of $90.0 million at December 31,
2009, matures in March 2011. We repaid an additional
$45.0 million on the term loan through February 26,
2010, leaving a remaining outstanding balance of
$45.0 million. Additionally, we have limited obligations to
fund redevelopment commitments during the year ending
December 31, 2010, and no development commitments.
At December 31, 2009, we had $81.3 million in cash and
cash equivalents, a decrease of $218.4 million from
December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, we had
$220.0 million of restricted cash, primarily consisting of
reserves and escrows held by lenders for bond sinking funds,
capital additions, property taxes and insurance. In addition,
cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are held by
partnerships that are not presented on a consolidated basis. The
following discussion relates to changes in cash due to
operating, investing and financing activities, which are
presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows in
Item 8.
Operating
Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash provided
by operating activities of $233.8 million was primarily
related to operating income from our consolidated properties,
which is affected primarily by rental rates, occupancy levels
and operating expenses related to our portfolio of properties,
in excess of payments of operating accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, including amounts related to our organizational
restructuring. Cash provided by operating activities decreased
$206.6 million compared with the year ended
December 31, 2008, primarily due to a $159.3 million
decrease in operating income related to consolidated properties
included in discontinued operations, which was attributable to
property sales in 2009 and 2008, a $42.8 million decrease
in promote income, which is generated by the disposition of
properties by consolidated real estate partnerships, and an
G-35
increase in payments on operating accounts payable and accrued
expenses, including payments related to our restructuring
accrual, in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Investing
Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash provided
by investing activities of $630.7 million consisted
primarily of proceeds from disposition of real estate and
partnership interests, partially offset by capital expenditures.
Although we hold all of our properties for investment, we sell
properties when they do not meet our investment criteria or are
located in areas that we believe do not justify our continued
investment when compared to alternative uses for our capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we sold 89
consolidated properties. These properties were sold for an
aggregate sales price of $1.3 billion, or
$1.2 billion, after the payment of transaction costs and
debt prepayment penalties. The $1.2 billion is inclusive of
promote income and debt assumed by buyers. Net cash proceeds
from property sales were used primarily to repay term debt and
for other corporate purposes.
Capital
Additions
We classify all capital additions as Capital Replacements (which
we refer to as CR), Capital Improvements (which we refer to as
CI), casualties or redevelopment. Additions other than casualty
or redevelopment capital additions are apportioned between CR
and CI based on the useful life of the capital item under
consideration and the period we have owned the property.
CR represents the share of capital additions that are deemed to
replace the portion of acquired capital assets that was consumed
during the period we have owned the asset. CI represents the
share of additions that are made to enhance the value,
profitability or useful life of an asset as compared to its
original purchase condition. CR and CI exclude capital additions
for casualties and redevelopment. Casualty additions represent
capitalized costs incurred in connection with casualty losses
and are associated with the restoration of the asset. A portion
of the restoration costs may be reimbursed by insurance carriers
subject to deductibles associated with each loss. Redevelopment
additions represent additions that substantially upgrade the
property.
G-36
The table below details our share of actual spending, on both
consolidated and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, for
CR, CI, casualties and redevelopment for the year ended
December 31, 2009, on a per unit and total dollar basis (in
thousands, except per unit amounts). Per unit numbers for CR and
CI are based on approximately 97,196 average units for the year,
including 81,135 conventional units and 16,061 affordable units.
Average units are weighted for the portion of the period that we
owned an interest in the property, represent ownership-adjusted
effective units, and exclude non-managed units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
Our Share of
|
|
|
Effective
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
Capital Replacements Detail:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building and grounds
|
|
$
|
32,876
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
Turnover related
|
|
|
30,298
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Capitalized site payroll and indirect costs
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of Capital Replacements
|
|
$
|
70,250
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Replacements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
$
|
64,675
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of Capital Replacements
|
|
|
70,250
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Improvements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
47,634
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
5,755
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of Capital Improvements
|
|
|
53,389
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
17,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of casualties
|
|
|
19,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional projects
|
|
|
66,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit projects(1)
|
|
|
46,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of redevelopment
|
|
|
112,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital additions
|
|
|
256,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus noncontrolling partners share of consolidated
additions
|
|
|
20,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less our share of unconsolidated additions
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital additions
|
|
$
|
275,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Redevelopment additions on tax credit projects are substantially
funded from tax credit investor contributions. |
Included in the above additions for CI, casualties and
redevelopment, was approximately $34.6 million of our share
of capitalized site payroll and indirect costs related to these
activities for the year ended December 31, 2009.
We generally fund capital additions with cash provided by
operating activities, working capital and property sales as
discussed below.
G-37
Financing
Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash used in
financing activities of $1.1 billion was primarily
attributed to debt principal payments, distributions paid to
common and preferred unitholders and distributions to
noncontrolling interests, partially offset by proceeds from
property loans.
Property
Debt
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $5.6 billion and
$6.3 billion, respectively, in consolidated property debt
outstanding, which included $29.2 million and
$759.3 million, respectively, of property debt classified
within liabilities related to assets held for sale. During the
year ended December 31, 2009, we refinanced or closed
property loans on 55 properties generating $788.1 million
of proceeds from borrowings with a weighted average interest
rate of 5.78%. Our share of the net proceeds after repayment of
existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to
limited partners, was $132.3 million. We used these total
net proceeds for capital expenditures and other corporate
purposes. We intend to continue to refinance property debt
primarily as a means of extending current and near term
maturities and to finance certain capital projects.
Term
Loans and Credit Facility
We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement,
as amended, with a syndicate of financial institutions, which we
refer to as the Credit Agreement.
As of December 31, 2009, the Credit Agreement consisted of
aggregate commitments of $270.0 million, comprised of our
$90.0 million outstanding balance on the term loan and
$180.0 million of revolving loan commitments. The term loan
bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%, or at our option, a base rate
equal to the prime rate, and matures March 2011. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a
pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 4.25%
with a LIBOR floor of 2.00% or, at our option, a base rate equal
to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.00%). The revolving credit
facility matures May 1, 2011, and may be extended for an
additional year, subject to certain conditions, including
payment of a 45.0 basis point fee on the total revolving
commitments and repayment of the remaining term loan balance by
February 1, 2011.
At December 31, 2009, the term loan had an outstanding
principal balance of $90.0 million and an interest rate of
1.73%. We repaid $45.0 million on the term loan through
February 26, 2010, leaving a remaining outstanding balance
of $45.0 million. At December 31, 2009, we had no
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The
amount available under the revolving credit facility at
December 31, 2009, was $136.2 million (after giving
effect to $43.8 million outstanding for undrawn letters of
credit issued under the revolving credit facility). The proceeds
of revolving loans are generally permitted to be used to fund
working capital and for other corporate purposes.
Fair
Value Measurements
We have entered into total rate of return swaps on various fixed
rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed rate notes
payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a
variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to
lower our cost of borrowing. We designate total rate of return
swaps as hedges of the risk of overall changes in the fair value
of the underlying borrowings. At each reporting period, we
estimate the fair value of these borrowings and the total rate
of return swaps and recognize any changes therein as an
adjustment of interest expense.
Our method used to calculate the fair value of the total rate of
return swaps generally results in changes in fair value that are
equal to the changes in fair value of the related borrowings,
which is consistent with our hedging strategy. We believe that
these financial instruments are highly effective in offsetting
the changes in fair value of the related borrowings during the
hedging period, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of
these instruments have no material impact on our liquidity,
results of operations or capital resources.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, changes in the
fair values of these financial instruments resulted in increases
of $5.2 million in the carrying amount of the hedged
borrowings and equal decreases in accrued liabilities and other
for total rate of return swaps. At December 31, 2009, the
cumulative recognized changes in the fair value
G-38
of these financial instruments resulted in a $24.3 million
reduction in the carrying amount of the hedged borrowings offset
by an equal increase in accrued liabilities and other for total
rate of return swaps. The cumulative changes in the fair values
of the hedged borrowings and related swaps reflect the recent
uncertainty in the credit markets which has decreased demand and
increased pricing for similar debt instruments.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received net
cash receipts of $19.4 million under the total return
swaps, which positively affected our liquidity. To the extent
interest rates increase above the fixed rates on the underlying
borrowings, our obligations under the total return swaps will
negatively affect our liquidity. At December 31, 2009, we
were not required to provide cash collateral pursuant to the
total rate of return swaps. In the event the values of the real
estate properties serving as collateral under these agreements
decline, we may be required to provide additional collateral
pursuant to the swap agreements, which would adversely affect
our liquidity.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 for more information on our total rate of return
swaps and related borrowings.
Partners
Capital Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we paid cash
distributions totaling $59.2 million, $116.8 million
and $92.4 million to preferred unitholders, common
unitholders and noncontrolling interests, respectively.
Additionally, we paid distributions totaling $149.0 million
to Aimco through the issuance of approximately 15.5 million
common OP units.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, Aimco repurchased
12 shares, or $6.0 million in liquidation preference,
of its CRA Preferred Stock for $4.2 million. Concurrent
with Aimcos repurchase, we repurchased from Aimco an
equivalent number of our CRA Preferred Units.
We and Aimco have a shelf registration statement that provides
for the issuance of debt securities by us and debt and equity
securities by Aimco.
Contractual
Obligations
This table summarizes information contained elsewhere in this
Annual Report regarding payments due under contractual
obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2009
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Scheduled long-term debt maturities(1)
|
|
$
|
5,600,310
|
|
|
$
|
105,294
|
|
|
$
|
660,733
|
|
|
$
|
868,615
|
|
|
$
|
3,965,668
|
|
Scheduled long-term debt maturities related to properties
classified as held for sale(1)
|
|
|
29,177
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
11,206
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
16,584
|
|
Term loan(1)(2)
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment and other construction commitments
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases for space occupied(3)
|
|
|
24,888
|
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
|
10,856
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
Other obligations(4)
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,753,775
|
|
|
$
|
122,558
|
|
|
$
|
772,795
|
|
|
$
|
874,342
|
|
|
$
|
3,984,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Scheduled debt maturities presented above include amortization
and the maturities in 2010 consist primarily of amortization.
The scheduled maturities presented above exclude related
interest amounts. Refer to Note 6 in the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 for a description of average
interest rates associated with our debt. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
After payments of $45.0 million through February 26,
2010, the term loan had an outstanding balance of
$45.0 million. |
G-39
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Inclusive of leased space that has been abandoned as part of our
organizational restructuring in 2008 (see Restructuring Costs
in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8). |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents a commitment to fund $4.6 million in second
mortgage loans on certain properties in West Harlem, New York
City. |
In addition to the amounts presented in the table above, at
December 31, 2009, we had $690.5 million of
outstanding preferred units outstanding with annual dividend
yields ranging from 1.5% (variable) to 9.4%, and
$85.7 million of redeemable preferred units outstanding
with annual distribution yields ranging from 5.9% to 9.5%.
Additionally, we may enter into commitments to purchase goods
and services in connection with the operations of our
properties. Those commitments generally have terms of one year
or less and reflect expenditure levels comparable to our
historical expenditures.
Future
Capital Needs
In addition to the items set forth in Contractual
Obligations above, we expect to fund any future
acquisitions, additional redevelopment projects, capital
improvements and capital replacement principally with proceeds
from property sales (including tax-free exchange proceeds),
short-term borrowings, debt and equity financing (including tax
credit equity) and operating cash flows.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We own general and limited partner interests in unconsolidated
real estate partnerships, in which our total ownership interests
typically range from less than 1% to 50% and in some instances
may exceed 50%. There are no lines of credit, side agreements,
or any other derivative financial instruments related to or
between our unconsolidated real estate partnerships and us and
no material exposure to financial guarantees. Accordingly, our
maximum risk of loss related to these unconsolidated real estate
partnerships is limited to the aggregate carrying amount of our
investment in the unconsolidated real estate partnerships and
any outstanding notes receivable as reported in our consolidated
financial statements (see Note 4 of the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 for additional information
about our investments in unconsolidated real estate
partnerships).
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Our primary market risk exposure relates to changes in base
interest rates, credit risk spreads and availability of credit.
We are not subject to any other material market rate or price
risks. We use predominantly long-term, fixed-rate non-recourse
property debt in order to avoid the refunding and repricing
risks of short-term borrowings. We use short-term debt financing
and working capital primarily to fund short-term uses and
acquisitions and generally expect to refinance such borrowings
with cash from operating activities, property sales proceeds,
long-term debt or equity financings. We use total rate-of-
return swaps to obtain the benefit of variable rates on certain
of our fixed rate debt instruments. We make limited use of other
derivative financial instruments and we do not use them for
trading or other speculative purposes.
We had $654.6 million of floating rate debt and
$67.0 million of floating rate preferred OP Units
outstanding at December 31, 2009. Of the total floating
rate debt, the major components were floating rate tax-exempt
bond financing ($433.9 million), floating rate secured
notes ($122.2 million) and a term loan
($90.0 million). At December 31, 2009, we had
approximately $440.9 million in cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash and notes receivable, the majority of which bear
interest. The effect of our interest-bearing assets would
partially reduce the effect of an increase in variable interest
rates. Historically, changes in tax-exempt interest rates have
been at a ratio of less than 1:1 with changes in taxable
interest rates. Floating rate tax-exempt bond financing is
benchmarked against the SIFMA rate, which since 1989 has
averaged 73% of the
30-day LIBOR
rate. If the historical relationship continues, on an annual
basis, we estimate that an increase in
30-day LIBOR
of 100 basis points (73 basis points for tax-exempt
interest rates) with constant credit risk spreads would result
in net income and our net income attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders being reduced by
$1.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
We estimate the fair value for our debt instruments using
present value techniques that include income and market
valuation approaches with market rates for debt with the same or
similar terms. Present value calculations
G-40
vary depending on the assumptions used, including the discount
rate and estimates of future cash flows. In many cases, the fair
value estimates may not be realizable in immediate settlement of
the instruments. The estimated aggregate fair value of our
consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities
related to assets held for sale) was approximately
$5.7 billion and $6.7 billion at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The combined carrying value of our
consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities
related to assets held for sale) was approximately
$5.7 billion and $6.8 billion at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 6 and Note 7 to
the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further
details on our consolidated debt. Refer to Derivative
Financial Instruments in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion
regarding certain of our fixed rate debt that is subject to
total rate of return swap instruments. If market rates for our
fixed-rate debt were higher by 100 basis points with
constant credit risk spreads, the estimated fair value of our
debt discussed above would have decreased from $5.7 billion
to $5.4 billion. If market rates for our debt discussed
above were lower by 100 basis points with constant credit
risk spreads, the estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt
would have increased from $5.7 billion to $6.1 billion.
At December 31, 2009, we had swap positions with two
financial institutions totaling $353.1 million. The related
swap agreements provide for collateral calls to maintain
specified
loan-to-value
ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties
serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be
required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap
agreements, which would adversely affect our cash flows. At
December 31, 2009, we were not required to provide cash
collateral based on the
loan-to-value
ratios of the real estate properties serving as collateral under
these agreements.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The independent registered public accounting firms report,
consolidated financial statements and schedule listed in the
accompanying index are filed as part of this report and
incorporated herein by this reference. See Index to
Financial Statements on
page F-1
of this Annual Report.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Partnerships management, with the participation of the
chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
General Partner, who are the equivalent of the
Partnerships chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer of the General Partner have
concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Partnership is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined
in
Rule 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the General Partners principal executive
and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by the General Partners board of
directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;
|
G-41
|
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of the General
Partners management and directors of the
Partnership; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Partnerships assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnerships
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework.
Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of
December 31, 2009, the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting is effective.
The Partnerships independent registered public accounting
firm has issued an attestation report on the Partnerships
internal control over financial reporting.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2009 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
G-42
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Partners
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
We have audited AIMCO Properties, L.P.s (the
Partnership) internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Partnerships
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, partners capital, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2009, and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2010
G-43
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The board of directors of the General Partner consists of Terry
Considine and Miles Cortez. The officers of Aimco are also the
officers of the General Partner and hold the same titles. The
information required by this item is presented under the
captions Board of Directors and Executive Officers
and Corporate Governance Matters Code of
Ethics in the proxy statement for Aimcos 2010 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, requires the General Partners executive officers
and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of OP Units, to file reports
(Forms 3, 4 and 5) of unit ownership and changes in
unit ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Executive officers, directors and beneficial
owners of more than ten percent of OP Units are required by
SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all such forms that
they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of
Forms 3, 4 and 5 and the amendments thereto received by us
for the year ended December 31, 2009, or written
representations from certain reporting persons that no
Forms 5 were required to be filed by those persons, we
believe that during the period ended December 31, 2008, all
filing requirements were complied with by the General
Partners executive officers and directors and beneficial
owners of more than ten percent of OP Units.
Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The board of directors of the General Partner does
not have a separate audit committee or nominating and corporate
governance committee. Based on the structure of the Partnership
and its relationship to Aimco, which has a separate audit
committee and nominating and corporate governance committee,
committees are not warranted for the Partnership. The audit
committee of Aimcos board of directors makes
determinations concerning the engagement of the independent
registered public accounting firm for Aimco and its
subsidiaries, including the Partnership. In addition, the Aimco
audit committee reviews with the independent registered public
accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement,
reviews the independence of the independent registered public
accounting firm, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees
and reviews the adequacy of internal control over financial
reporting. The Aimco audit committee currently consists of James
N. Bailey, Richard S. Ellwood, Thomas L. Keltner, J. Landis
Martin, Robert A. Miller and Michael A. Stein. Aimcos
board of directors has determined that Michael A. Stein is an
audit committee financial expert. Aimcos board
of directors has also determined that each member of the audit
committee is independent, as that term is defined by
Section 303A of the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange relating to audit committees.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is presented under the
captions Compensation Discussion &
Analysis, Compensation and Human Resources Committee
Report to Stockholders, Summary Compensation
Table, Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2009,
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2009,
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2009, and
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control in the proxy statement for Aimcos 2010
annual meeting of stockholders and is incorporated herein by
reference. The directors of the General Partner do not receive
additional compensation for serving as directors.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The board of directors of the General Partner consists of
Messrs. Considine and Cortez. Additional information
required by this item is presented under the captions
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Securities Authorized for Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans in the proxy statement
G-44
for Aimcos 2010 annual meeting of stockholders and is
incorporated herein by reference. As of February 25, 2010,
AIMCO-LP Trust held approximately 93% of the common
OP Units and equivalents outstanding.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
Information required by this item is presented under the caption
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
the proxy statement for Aimcos 2010 annual meeting of
stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The
directors of the General Partner are not independent.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item is presented under the
caption Principal Accountant Fees and Services in
the proxy statement for Aimcos 2010 annual meeting of
stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
(a)(1)
|
|
The financial statements listed in the Index to Financial
Statements on Page F-1 of this report are filed as part of this
report and incorporated herein by reference.
|
(a)(2)
|
|
The financial statement schedule listed in the Index to
Financial Statements on Page F-1 of this report is filed as part
of this report and incorporated herein by reference.
|
(a)(3)
|
|
The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
|
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of July 29, 1994, as
amended and restated as of February 28, 2007
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, is incorporated
herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of
December 31, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Second Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of
July 30, 2009 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
November 2, 2004, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties,
L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP Management Company
as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National
Association, and the Lenders listed therein (Exhibit 4.1 to
Aimcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Secured Credit
Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2005, by and among Aimco,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP
Management Company as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A.,
Keybank National Association, and the Lenders listed therein
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2006, by and among Aimco,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as
the borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National
Association, and the lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated March 22, 2006, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
G-45
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Third Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
August 31, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated August 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 14, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 14, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 9, 2008, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 11, 2008, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 1, 2009, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as
of August 4, 2009, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein and the lenders party thereto (Exhibit 10.1
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated August 6, 2009, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Eighth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
February 3, 2010, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein and the lenders party thereto (Exhibit 10.1
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated February 5, 2010, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Master Indemnification Agreement, dated December 3, 2001,
by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO
Properties, L.P., XYZ Holdings LLC, and the other parties
signatory thereto (Exhibit 2.3 to Aimcos Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Tax Indemnification and Contest Agreement, dated
December 3, 2001, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, National Partnership Investments, Corp., and
XYZ Holdings LLC and the other parties signatory thereto
(Exhibit 2.4 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of AIMCO JV Portfolio #1,
LLC dated as of December 30, 2003 by and among AIMCO
BRE I, LLC, AIMCO BRE II, LLC and SRV-AJVP#1, LLC
(Exhibit 10.54 to Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated
herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Employment Contract executed on December 29, 2008, by and
between AIMCO Properties, L.P. and Terry Considine
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 29, 2008, is incorporated herein by this
reference)*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Apartment Investment and Management Company 1997 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan (October 1999) (Exhibit 10.26 to
Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, is incorporated
herein by this reference)*
|
G-46
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (1997 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.11 to Aimcos Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, is
incorporated herein by this reference)*
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (1997 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.42 to Aimcos Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, is incorporated
herein by this reference)*
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Appendix A to Aimcos Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 20, 2007)*
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to
Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)*
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.3
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Appendix B to Aimcos Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 20, 2007)*
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Agreement re: disclosure of long-term debt instruments
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Schedule and supplemental materials to the exhibits have been
omitted but will be provided to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The file reference number for all exhibits is
001-13232,
and all such exhibits remain available pursuant to the Records
Control Schedule of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
G-47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
By: AIMCO-GP, Inc., its General Partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ TERRY
CONSIDINE
Terry
Considine
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Date: February 26, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ TERRY
CONSIDINE
Terry
Considine
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
registrants general partner (principal executive officer)
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MILES
CORTEZ
Miles
Cortez
|
|
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer of the registrants general partner
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
Ernest
M. Freedman
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
registrants general partner (principal financial officer)
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PAUL
BELDIN
Paul
Beldin
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the
registrants general partner (principal accounting officer)
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
G-48
** The report of the independent registered public accounting
firm, the financial statements and the notes thereto that were
included in Aimco OPs Annual Report on Form 10-K for year
ended December 31, 2009 have been omitted from this Annex. See
Annex I to this information statement/prospectus, which includes
Aimco OPs Selected Financial Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for
the year ended December 31, 2009, revised to reflect
discontinued operations and changes in business segments. Any
references to the F pages in the body of the 10-K should be
referenced to Annex I. **
Exhibit 21.1
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
107-145 WEST
135TH STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
1133 FIFTEENTH STREET ASSOCIATES
|
|
DC
|
1133 FIFTEENTH STREET FOUR ASSOCIATES (A MARYLAND LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP)
|
|
MD
|
1212 SOUTH MICHIGAN LLC
|
|
IL
|
1-36 JAIDEE DRIVE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
1625 ROSEMARIE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
224 E. COMMONWEALTH APARTMENTS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
249 ALBANY HEIGHTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
324 SOUTH HORNE STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
3258 BCP ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
TN
|
5 MILE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
601 NORTH GRAND AVENUE PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
62ND STREET JOINT VENTURE
|
|
IL
|
62ND STREET LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
7400 ROOSEVELT INVESTORS
|
|
PA
|
ABBOTT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
ACQUISITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ACTC VI MANAGER, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AHP ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
|
|
ME
|
AIC REIT PROPERTIES LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 1582 FIRST AVENUE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 173 EAST 90TH STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
182-188
COLUMBUS AVENUE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
204-206 WEST
133, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
2232-2240
ACP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
2247-2253
ACP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
2252-2258
ACP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
2300-2310
ACP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 237 NINTH AVENUE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 240 WEST 73RD STREET CO-OWNER, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 240 WEST 73RD STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 2484 ACP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 306 EAST 89TH STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 311/313 EAST 73RD STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 322 EAST 61ST STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
1
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO 452 EAST 78TH STREET PROPERTY, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO
464-466 AMSTERDAM
200-210 WEST
83RD STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 510 EAST 88TH STREET PROPERTY, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 514 EAST 88TH STREET, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 656 ST. NICHOLAS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 759 ST. NICHOLAS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO 88TH STREET/SECOND AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ALL HALLOWS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ANCHORAGE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ANGELES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ANTIOCH, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ARBORS-GROVETREE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ARVADA HOUSE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ASSOCIATED PROPERTIES, LP
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ASSURANCE LTD.
|
|
BD
|
AIMCO AUBURN GLEN APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BALAYE APARTMENTS I, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BALAYE APARTMENTS II, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BARCELONA, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BAYVIEW, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BEACON HILL PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BEAU JARDIN, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BEECH LAKE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BILTMORE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BOLTON NORTH, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BOSTON LOFTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BRE I, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BRE II, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BREAKERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BRIARWEST, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BRIARWOOD, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BROOK RUN, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BUENA VISTA APARTMENTS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BUENA VISTA APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO BUTTERNUT CREEK PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CALHOUN CLUB, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CALHOUN, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAMERON VILLAS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL HOLDINGS FUND VI, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL HOLDINGS FUND VII, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND I, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND III, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV, LLC
|
|
DE
|
2
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IX, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND V, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND VI, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND VII, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND X, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND XI, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND XII, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND XIII, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT I, INC.
|
|
CA
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT MANAGEMENT II, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL TAX CREDIT MANAGEMENT III, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CAPITAL, INC.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CARRIAGE HOUSE GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CASA DE LAS HERMANITAS DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CASA DE MONTEREY GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CASA DE MONTEREY, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CENTRAL PARK TOWNHOMES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHATHAM HARBOR, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHELSEA LAND, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHELSEA MEMBER, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHELSEA RIDGE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHESTNUT HALL GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHESTNUT HALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CHESTNUT HILL GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CK PROPERTIES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO COLUMBUS AVE., LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO COPPERWOOD, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO COUNTRY CLUB HEIGHTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO COUNTRY LAKES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO COVINGTON POINTE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CREVENNA OAKS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CROSSWOOD PARK APARTMENTS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CROSSWOOD PARK APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CROSSWOOD PARK GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO CROSSWOOD PARK, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO DEERBROOK, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO DORAL OAKS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ELM CREEK, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO EQUITY SERVICES, INC.
|
|
VA
|
AIMCO ESPLANADE AVENUE APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FALL RIVER II, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FALL RIVER, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
3
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO FISHERMANS WHARF, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FORESTLAKE APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FOUNTAIN PLACE PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FOXCHASE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO FRAMINGHAM, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GARDENS GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GLENS APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GP LA, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GRANADA, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GREENBRIAR PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GREENS OF NAPERVILLE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GREENS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GREENSPRING, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GROUP, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO GS SWAP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HANOVER SQUARE/DIP, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HARLEM FUNDING, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HEMET DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HERITAGE PARK, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HILLMEADE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HOLDINGS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HOPKINS VILLAGE PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HORIZONS WEST APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HP/SWAP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HUDSON HARBOUR, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HUNTERS CROSSING, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO HYDE PARK TOWER, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO INDEPENDENCE GREEN, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO INDIO DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO INGRAM SQUARE PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO IPLP, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO JACQUES-MILLER, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO JV PORTFOLIO #1, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO KEY TOWERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO KIRKWOOD HOUSE PRESERVATION SLP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LA SALLE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LA VISTA, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LAKE CASTLETON ARMS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LEAHY SQUARE APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LOFTS HOLDINGS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LORING TOWERS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LOS ARBOLES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO LP LA, LP
|
|
DE
|
4
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO LT, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MAPLE BAY, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MERRILL HOUSE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MICHIGAN MEADOWS HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MONTEREY GROVE APARTMENTS TIC 2, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MONTEREY GROVE APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MOUNTAIN VIEW APARTMENTS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MOUNTAIN VIEW APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO MOUNTAIN VIEW, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO N.P. LOFTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NET LESSEE (BAYBERRY HILL), LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NET LESSEE (GEORGETOWN), LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NET LESSEE (MARLBORO), LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NET LESSEE (WATERFORD VILLAGE), LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NEW BALTIMORE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NEWBERRY PARK PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NON-ECONOMIC MEMBER, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NORTH ANDOVER, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO NORTHPOINT, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO OAK FOREST I, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO OAK FOREST II, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO OCEAN OAKS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO OLDE TOWN WEST III, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO OXFORD HOUSE PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PACIFICA PARK APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PALM SPRINGS DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PANORAMA PARK PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARADISE PALMS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARK AT CEDAR LAWN, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARK LA BREA HOLDINGS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARK LA BREA SERVICES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARK PLACE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARKVIEW DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARKVIEW MANOR, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PARKWAYS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PATHFINDER VILLAGE APARTMENTS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PATHFINDER VILLAGE APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PAVILION PRESERVATION GP, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PINE BLUFF VILLAGE PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PINE SHADOWS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PINEBROOK, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PINES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PLEASANT HILL, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PLUMMER VILLAGE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
5
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES FINANCE PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES/ABHLD PARKVIEW MANOR, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO QRS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RAMBLEWOOD, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO REMINGTON, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RIDGEWOOD LA LOMA DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RIDGEWOOD TOWERS PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RIVER CLUB, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RIVER VILLAGE PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RIVERSIDE PARK, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RIVERWOODS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ROSE GARDENS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ROUND BARN MANOR GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ROYAL CREST NASHUA, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO ROYAL PALMS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO RUSCOMBE GARDENS SLP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SALEM PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SAN BRUNO APARTMENT PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SAN JOSE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SANDPIPER, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SCOTCHOLLOW APARTMENTS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SCOTCHOLLOW APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SELECT PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SHOREVIEW, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SIGNATURE POINT, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SOMERSET LAKES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SOUTH BAY VILLA, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO STAFFORD STUDENT APARTMENTS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO STERLING VILLAGE DEVCO, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SUMMIT OAKS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO SUNSET ESCONDIDO, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TALBOT WOODS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TAMARAC PINES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TERRY MANOR, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TOMPKINS TERRACE GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TOR, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TOWNSHIP AT HIGHLANDS APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO TREE CARE DIVISION, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO VAN NUYS PRESERVATION, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO VANTAGE POINTE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO VENEZIA, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO VERDES DEL ORIENTE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO VILLA DE GUADALUPE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
6
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO VILLAGE CREEK AT BROOKHILL, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO VILLAGE CROSSING, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WALNUT HILLS PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WARWICK, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WASHINGTON SQUARE WEST GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WAVERLY APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WESTCHESTER PARK, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WESTGATE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WESTMINSTER OAKS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WESTWOOD PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WESTWOOD TERRACE GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WEXFORD VILLAGE II, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WEXFORD VILLAGE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WHITEFIELD PLACE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WILSON ACRES MANAGER, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WILSON ACRES, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WINDWARD, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WINTER GARDEN, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WOODLAND HILLS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO WOODS OF BURNSVILLE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO YORKTOWN, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/ALLVIEW, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/APOLLO, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BETHESDA EMPLOYEE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BETHESDA GP, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BETHESDA HOLDINGS ACQUISITIONS, INC.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BETHESDA HOLDINGS, INC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BETHESDA II, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BLUFFS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BRANDERMILL, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BRANDON, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/BRANDYWINE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/CASSELBERRY, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/CHICKASAW, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/CHIMNEYTOP, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/COLONNADE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/COLONNADE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/CONTINENTAL PLAZA LIMITED GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/DFW APARTMENT INVESTORS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/DFW RESIDENTIAL INVESTORS GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/FARMINGDALE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/FOX VALLEY, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/FOXTREE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
7
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
AIMCO/FOXTREE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/GALLERIA PARK ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/GROVETREE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/GROVETREE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/HIL, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/HOLLIDAY ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/KIRKMAN, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/LAKE RIDGE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/LANTANA, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/LEXINGTON, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/MIDDLETOWN, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/MINNEAPOLIS ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/NASHUA, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/NEWPORT, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/NHP PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/NHP PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/NORTH WOODS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/ONE LINWOOD ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/PALM BEACH, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/PARK TOWNE PLACE ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/PINELLAS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/RALS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/RAVENSWORTH ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/RIVERSIDE PARK ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/SCHAUMBURG, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/SHADETREE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/SHADETREE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/SOUTHRIDGE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/STANDPOINT VISTA GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/STONEGATE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/SWAP, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/TIDEWATER, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/TIMBERTREE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/TIMBERTREE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/TRAVIS ONE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/WAI ASSOCIATES GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/WAI ASSOCIATES LP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/WESTRIDGE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/WICKERTREE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/WICKERTREE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO/WINROCK-HOUSTON GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AIMCO-LP TRUST
|
|
DE
|
AJ ONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
AJ TWO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
8
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
ALABAMA PROPERTIES LTD., II
|
|
AL
|
ALABAMA PROPERTIES, LTD., V
|
|
AL
|
ALASKA HOUSE ASSOCIATES
|
|
WA
|
ALEX PLACE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AL
|
ALEXANDER PLACE APARTMENTS, A LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
ALL HALLOWS ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
ALL HALLOWS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
ALLENTOWN TOWNE HOUSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
ALLENTOWN-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ALLIANCE TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
ALLISON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
CO
|
ALLVIEW-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ALMS HILL II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
AMARILLO NORTHWEST VILLAGE, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
AMBASSADOR APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR CRM FLORIDA PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR FLORIDA PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR I, L. P.
|
|
IL
|
AMBASSADOR II JV GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR II JV, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR III, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR IX, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR TEXAS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR VII, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR VIII, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AMBASSADOR X, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
ANCHORAGE PARTNERS, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
ANDERSON OAKS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. 6
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. II
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES PARTNERS X
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES PARTNERS XII
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES REALTY CORPORATION
|
|
CA
|
ANGELES REALTY CORPORATION II
|
|
CA
|
ANTIOCH PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
ANTON SQUARE, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
AP XII ASSOCIATES GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
AP XII TWIN LAKE TOWERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AP XII TWIN LAKE TOWERS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
APARTMENT CCG 17, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
APARTMENT CCG 17, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
9
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
APARTMENT CREEK 17A LLC
|
|
CO
|
APARTMENT LODGE 17A LLC
|
|
CO
|
APOLLO-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
APPLE RIDGE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
KY
|
APPLE TREE ASSOCIATES, AN IDAHO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
ID
|
ARCHERS GREEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
ARISTOCRAT MANOR, LTD.
|
|
AR
|
ARKANSAS CITY APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AR
|
ARLINGTON SENIOR HOUSING, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
ARVADA HOUSE PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CO
|
ASHLAND MANOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
ATHENS GARDENS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
ATHENS STATION, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
ATLANTA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
ATLANTIC IX, L.L.C.
|
|
MI
|
ATRIUM VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
ATRIUMS OF PLANTATION JV GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
ATRIUMS OF PLANTATION JV, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
AVON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
|
|
PA
|
AVONDALE SIESTA POINTE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
AZALEA COURT INVESTMENT GROUP, BRENTWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NO. 2
|
|
AL
|
BAISLEY PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
BALDWIN COUNTY HOUSING, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
BALDWIN OAKS ELDERLY, LTD.
|
|
NJ
|
BALDWIN TOWERS ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BANGOR HOUSE PROPRIETARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
ME
|
BANNOCK ARMS SECOND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
BARNESBORO ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
BAY PARC PLAZA APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
BAYBERRY HILL, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
BAYHEAD VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
BAYVIEW PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
BEACON HILL PRESERVATION LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
BEDFORD HOUSE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
BELLA GRANDE, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
BELLAIR MANOR, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
BELLERIVE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
BELLEVILLE MANOR APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
BELLS BAY, L.P.
|
|
SC
|
BELMONT 189 ASSOCIATES
|
|
NY
|
BELOIT MATURE ADULT HOUSING, L.L.C.
|
|
WI
|
BENJAMIN BANNEKER PLAZA ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
10
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
BENSALEM GARDEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
BENT TREE II-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
BENT TREE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
BEREA SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
BERKLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
BETHEL COLUMBUS CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
BETHEL COLUMBUS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
BETHEL TOWERS LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
BETHLEHEM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
|
|
PA
|
BETTER HOUSING ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
BEVILLE-ISLAND CLUB APARTMENTS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
BILTMORE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
BIRCH MANOR APARTMENTS
|
|
OH
|
BIRCH MANOR APARTMENTS PHASE II
|
|
OH
|
BIRCH MANOR APARTMENTS, PHASE 1 LTD.
|
|
OH
|
BIRCH MANOR APARTMENTS, PHASE II LTD.
|
|
OH
|
BIRCHFIELD ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BLAKEWOOD PROPERTIES ASSOCIATES
|
|
GA
|
BLANCHARD APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
BLOOMSBURG ELDERLY ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BLUEWATER LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
BOLTON NORTH PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
BRANDEMERE-REO, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
BRANDERMILL-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
BRANDON-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
BRANFORD DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
BRIARCLIFFE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
BRIGHTON APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
BRIGHTON GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
BRIGHTON MEADOWS ASSOCIATES, AN INDIANA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
BRIGHTWOOD MANOR ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BRINTON MANOR NO. 1 ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BRINTON TOWERS ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BRISTOL PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
BROAD RIVER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
BROADMOOR APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LTD. PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
BROADMOOR AT CHELSEA ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
BROADWAY ASSOCIATES
|
|
RI
|
BROADWAY GLEN ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
BROOK RUN ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
BROOKSIDE APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
BROOKWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
BRYDEN HOUSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
BUCKHANNON MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
11
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
BUFFALO VILLAGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
BURKSHIRE COMMONS APARTMENTS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
BURLINGTON HOTEL BUILDING, LTD., LLLP
|
|
CO
|
BURLINGTON RIVER APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
BURNHAM GEREL
|
|
IL
|
BURNSVILLE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MN
|
BUTTERNUT CREEK PRESERVATION LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING
ASSOCIATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
BUYERS ACCESS LLC
|
|
DE
|
BW OPERATING COMPANY, L.L.C.
|
|
MA
|
CACHE CREEK PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
CALHOUN BUILDERS, INC. D/B/A PATMAN SWITCH ASSOCIATES, A
LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
CALIFORNIA SQUARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
KY
|
CALMARK HERITAGE PARK II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
CALMARK INVESTORS, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
CALMARK/FORT COLLINS, INC.
|
|
CA
|
CALMARK/FORT COLLINS, LTD.
|
|
CA
|
CALVERT CITY, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
CAMARILLO-ROSEWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
CAMBRIDGE COURT APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
SC
|
CAMBRIDGE HEIGHTS APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MS
|
CAMERON PARK VILLAGE LIMITED, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
CAMPBELL HEIGHTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
CANTERBURY GARDENS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
CANTERBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
CANTERBURY SERVICES LLC
|
|
DE
|
CANYON SHADOWS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
CAPITAL HEIGHTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
CAPITOL HILL ASSOCIATES
|
|
CO
|
CAROLINA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
CARPENTER-OXFORD ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CARPENTER-OXFORD, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
CARRIAGE APX, A MICHIGAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
CARRIAGE APX, INC.
|
|
MI
|
CARRIAGE APX, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CARRIAGE HOUSE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
CASA QUINTANA, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
CASDEN OFFICE HOLDINGS LLC
|
|
DE
|
CASDEN PROPERTIES LLC
|
|
DE
|
CASSADY VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
CASSELBERRY INVESTORS, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
CASSELBERRY-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CASTLEWOOD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IA
|
CAYUGA VILLAGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
12
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
CCIP PLANTATION GARDENS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP REGENCY OAKS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP STERLING, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP STERLING, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
CCIP/2 HIGHCREST, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP/2 VILLAGE BROOKE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP/2 WINDEMERE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP/2 WINDEMERE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
CCIP/3 SANDPIPER, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CCIP/3 WILLIAMSBURG MANOR, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CCP IV ARBOURS OF HERMITAGE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CCP IV ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
CCP IV KNOLLWOOD, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CCP/III VILLAGE GREEN GP, INC.
|
|
SC
|
CCP/IV RESIDENTIAL GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
CDLH AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
CEDAR RIM APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CEDAR TERRACE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
CENTER CITY ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
CENTER SQUARE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
CENTRAL PARK TOWERS II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
KS
|
CENTRAL PARK TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
KS
|
CENTRAL STATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
CENTRAL STROUD, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
FL
|
CENTRAL WOODLAWN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
CENTRAL WOODLAWN REHABILITATION JOINT VENTURE
|
|
IL
|
CENTURY LAKESIDE PLACE, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIV, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIV L.P.
|
|
CA
|
CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XIX, LP
|
|
DE
|
CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XV
|
|
CA
|
CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVI
|
|
CA
|
CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVII, LP
|
|
DE
|
CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTH FUND XXII, LP
|
|
DE
|
CENTURY SUN RIVER, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
CENTURY TOWER APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
CHA PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
DE
|
CHANDLER COMMONWEALTH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
CHANDLER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
CHANTILLY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
CHAPEL HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CHARLES STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
CHARLESTON-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CHARLTON HOUSING ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
13
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
CHARNEY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
CHATEAU FOGHORN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CHELSEA RENAISSANCE L.P.
|
|
KS
|
CHERRYWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
ID
|
CHESTNUT HILL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
CHESWICK-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
CHICKASAW-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CHICO GARDENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
CHILDRESS MANOR APARTMENTS
|
|
TX
|
CHIMNEYTOP-OXFORD ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
CHURCH STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
CHURCHVIEW GARDENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
CIDER MILL ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
CIMARRON ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
CITRUS GROVE JV GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
CITRUS GROVE JV, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
CITY HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
|
|
PA
|
CITY LINE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
CIVIC HOUSING ASSOCIATES I
|
|
OH
|
CIVIC HOUSING ASSOCIATES II
|
|
OH
|
CK SERVICES, INC.
|
|
DE
|
CK-GP II, INC.
|
|
DE
|
CK-LP II, INC.
|
|
DE
|
CLARKE COURT, LLC
|
|
WA
|
CLAYTON ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
CLEAR LAKE LAND PARTNERS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
CLIFFS APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
SC
|
CLOVERLANE FOUR-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CLOVERLANE III CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
CLOVERLANE III-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
CLUB APARTMENT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
COATESVILLE TOWERS
|
|
PA
|
COBBLESTONE CORNERS, L.P.
|
|
TN
|
COES POND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
COLCHESTER STAGE II COMPANY
|
|
MI
|
COLD SPRING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
COLLEGE OAKS PARK, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
COLLEGE PARK APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
COLLEGE TRACE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
COLONY HOUSE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
CA
|
COLUMBUS JUNCTION PARK, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
COMBINED PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
COMFED QUALIFIED HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERS XII, A NEBRASKA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NE
|
14
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
COMMUNITY CIRCLE II, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
COMMUNITY CIRCLE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS OF PRINCEVILLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
CONCAP EQUITIES, INC.
|
|
DE
|
CONCAP HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
TX
|
CONCAP VILLAGE GREEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
CONGRESS REALTY COMPANIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
CONGRESS REALTY CORP.
|
|
MA
|
CONIFER MEDFORD
|
|
OR
|
CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES, LP
|
|
DE
|
CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP
|
|
DE
|
CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/3, LP
|
|
DE
|
CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES III
|
|
CA
|
CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES IV, LP
|
|
DE
|
CONTINENTAL APARTMENTS
|
|
MI
|
CONTINENTAL PLAZA ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
CONTINENTAL PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
COOPER RIVER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
COPPERFIELD APARTMENTS JV, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
COPPERWOOD PRESERVATION, LP
|
|
TX
|
COUCH-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
COUCH-OXFORD, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
COUNTRY CLUB WOODS, AFFORDABLE HOMES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
COUNTRYSIDE NORTH AMERICAN PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
NJ
|
COUNTRYVIEW ESTATES I, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
COURTS OF CICERO II L.P.
|
|
IL
|
COURTYARD-OXFORD ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
COVENTRY SQUARE APARTMENTS JV, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
CPF 16 WOODS OF INVERNESS GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
CPF XIV/SUN RIVER, INC.
|
|
AZ
|
CPF XV/LAKESIDE PLACE, INC.
|
|
TX
|
CPGF 22 WOOD CREEK GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
CRC CONGRESS REALTY CORP
|
|
MA
|
CREEKSIDE INVESTMENT COMPANY
|
|
ID
|
CREEKVIEW ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
CREEKWOOD APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
CREVENNA OAKS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
CROCKETT MANOR APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
CRYAR HOMES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AL
|
CRYSTAL SPRINGS ASSOCIATES
|
|
WA
|
CUMBERLAND COURT ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
CUMMINGS MILL, LLC
|
|
ME
|
DAMEN COURT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
DARBY TOWNHOUSES ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
15
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
DARBY TOWNHOUSES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
DARBY TOWNHOUSES PRESERVATION GENERAL PARTNER, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
DARBY TOWNHOUSES PRESERVATION, LP
|
|
PA
|
DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
TN
|
DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE II, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
DAVIDSON GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS GP CORPORATION
|
|
DE
|
DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS GP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
DAVIDSON INCOME REAL ESTATE, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
DAVIDSON PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
TN
|
DAWSON SPRINGS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
DAYTON III CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
DAYTON III-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
DAYTONA VILLAGE, LTD
|
|
OH
|
DBL PROPERTIES CORPORATION
|
|
NY
|
DEERCROSS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
DEL MORAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
DELAVAN MATURE ADULT HOUSING, L.L.C.
|
|
WI
|
DELHAVEN MANOR, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
DELPHIA HOUSE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
DELTA SQUARE-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
DELTA SQUARE-OXFORD, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
DENNY PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
DESHLER APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
DFW RESIDENTIAL INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
DILLON PLACE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
DIP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
DIP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II
|
|
VA
|
DIVERSIFIED EQUITIES, LIMITED
|
|
TN
|
DIXON RIVER APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
DORAL GARDEN ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
DORAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
DOUGLAS STREET LANDINGS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
DOYLE ASSOCIATES LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES II LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
DUKE MANOR ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
DUQUESNE ASSOCIATES NO. 1
|
|
PA
|
EAST HAVEN REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
EAST WINDSOR 255 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
EASTGATE APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
EASTRIDGE APARTMENTS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
EASTRIDGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
ECO VILLAGE, LTD
|
|
OH
|
16
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
EDGEWOOD ASSOCIATES
|
|
WA
|
EDGEWOOD HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
GA
|
EDGEWOOD, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AR
|
EL CAZADOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
EL CORONADO APTS., LTD.
|
|
TX
|
ELDERLY DEVELOPMENT WESTMINSTER, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
ELKHART TOWN AND COUNTRY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
ELM GREEN APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
ELMS COMMON ASSOCIATES
|
|
CT
|
EMPORIA LIMITED
|
|
VA
|
ENGLISH MANOR JOINT VENTURE
|
|
TX
|
EUSTIS APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
EVANGELINE VILLAGE APARTMENTS A LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN
COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
EVANSVILLE SENIOR HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
EVEREST INVESTORS 5, LLC
|
|
CA
|
EVEREST WINGFIELD, L.P.
|
|
KS
|
EVERETT SQUARE PLAZA ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
EVERGREEN CLUB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
FAIR OAK ESTATES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
FAIRBURN AND GORDON ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
FAIRBURN AND GORDON ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
FAIRLANE EAST, LLC
|
|
DE
|
FAIRLAWN GREEN ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
KS
|
FAIRMONT HILLS APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
FAIRWIND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
WA
|
FAIRWOOD ASSOCIATES
|
|
CA
|
FARMINGDALE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
FERNWOOD LTD., LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
FILLMORE PLACE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
FINLAY INTERESTS 2, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
FINLAY INTERESTS MT 2, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
FIRST ALEXANDRIA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
FIRST WINTHROP CORPORATION
|
|
DE
|
FISH CREEK PLAZA, LTD
|
|
OH
|
FISHERMANS LANDING APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
FL
|
FISHERMANS LANDING JV GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
FISHERMANS LANDING JV, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
FISHERMANS VILLAGE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
FISHERMANS WHARF PARTNERS, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
FISHWIND CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
FMI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
FOOTHILL CHIMNEY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
FOREST GARDENS ASSOCIATES, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
FOREST PARK SOUTH, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
17
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
FOUNTAIN PLACE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
FOUR QUARTERS HABITAT APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
FOURTH STREET APARTMENT INVESTORS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
FOX ASSOCIATES 84
|
|
CA
|
FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
|
|
CA
|
FOX PARTNERS
|
|
CA
|
FOX PARTNERS II
|
|
CA
|
FOX PARTNERS III
|
|
CA
|
FOX PARTNERS IV
|
|
CA
|
FOX PARTNERS VIII
|
|
CA
|
FOX REALTY INVESTORS
|
|
CA
|
FOX RIDGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
WV
|
FOX RUN APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
FOX STRATEGIC HOUSING INCOME PARTNERS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
FOX VALLEY TWO-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
FOX VALLEY-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
FOXFIRE LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
FRANKLIN CHANDLER ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
FRANKLIN EAGLE ROCK ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
FRANKLIN NEW YORK AVENUE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
FRANKLIN PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
FRANKLIN PHEASANT RIDGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
FRANKLIN SQUARE SCHOOL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
FRANKLIN WOODS ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
FRANKLIN WOODS LTD
|
|
OH
|
FREEMAN EQUITIES, LIMITED
|
|
TN
|
FRIENDSET HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
FRIO HOUSING, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
FRP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
GADSDEN TOWERS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
GALLATIN ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
GALLERIA PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
GARDEN COURT ASSOCIATES
|
|
CA
|
GATE MANOR APARTMENTS, LTD., A TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
GATEWAY-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
GC SOUTHEAST PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
GEORGETOWN 20Y APARTMENTS, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
GEORGETOWN MANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
CA
|
GEORGETOWN WOODS LAND DEVELOPMENT, LP
|
|
IN
|
GEORGETOWN WOODS SENIOR APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
GERMANTOWN, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AR
|
GIFFORD GROVES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
18
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
GLENARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
RI
|
GLENBROOK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
GLENDALE TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
GOLDEN OAK VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
GOLER METROPOLITAN APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
GOOSE HOLLOW VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OR
|
GOTHAM APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
GP REAL ESTATE SERVICES II INC.
|
|
DE
|
GP SERVICES II, INC.
|
|
SC
|
GP SERVICES XV, INC.
|
|
SC
|
GP-OP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC
|
|
DE
|
GRAND MEADOWS II LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
GRAND PLAZA PRESERVATION GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
GRAND PLAZA PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
GRANDVIEW PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MT
|
GRANITE HEIGHTS, L.P.
|
|
TN
|
GRANT-KO ENTERPRISES A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
GREATER HARTFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
GREATER MESA PROPERTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
GREENBRIAR PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
GREENBRIAR-OXFORD ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
GREENFAIR TOWER II CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
GREENFAIR-DCW CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
GREEN-KO ENTERPRISES OF BARNEVELD, WISCONSIN A LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
GREENTREE ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
GREENWOOD VILLA APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
GRIMES PARK APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
GRINNELL PARK APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
GROVE PARK VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
GSSW-REO DALLAS, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
GSSW-REO PEBBLE CREEK, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
GSSW-REO TIMBERLINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
GULF COAST HOLDINGS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
GULF COAST PARTNERS, LTD.
|
|
CA
|
GULFPORT ASSOCIATES
|
|
WA
|
GWYNED PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
HALLS MILL, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
HAMLIN ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
HAMMOND HOUSING 1994 PARTNERS, A LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN
COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
HAMPSHIRE HOUSE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
HARDIN HAMMOCK ESTATES ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
19
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
HAROLD APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
HARRIS PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
HARRISON SQUARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
HATILLO HOUSING ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
HAWTHORN VILLAGE I, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
HC/OAC, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
HCW GENERAL PARTNER, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
HEARTLAND PARK ELDERLY LIVING CENTER, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
HEATHERWOOD-REO, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
HEMET ESTATES AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
HENNA TOWNHOMES, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
HENRIETTA-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A MARYLAND
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
HERITAGE EAGLE VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
CO
|
HERITAGE FOREST GROVE, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
HERITAGE HOLLYBROOK, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HERITAGE PARK II INC.
|
|
DE
|
HERITAGE PARK INVESTORS, INC.
|
|
CA
|
HERITAGE PHOENIX, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HERITAGE VILLAGE BLACKSHEAR, L.P.
|
|
GA
|
HERITAGE WILLOW GLEN, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
HHP L.P.
|
|
DE
|
HICKORY HEIGHTS APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
HICKORY HILL TOWNHOMES, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
HICKORY RIDGE ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HIGHLANDS VILLAGE II, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HIGHLAWN PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
HILLCREST APARTMENTS L.L.C.
|
|
OH
|
HILLSBOROUGH-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
HILLSIDE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
HILLTOP APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
HILLTOP APARTMENTS, PHASE II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
HILLTOP APARTMENTS, PHASE I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
HIMBOLA MANOR PARTNERSHIP SERVICES, INC. LTD., A
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
LA
|
HINTON HOUSE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
HISTORIC PROPERTIES INC.
|
|
DE
|
HIVIEW GARDENS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
|
|
PA
|
HMI PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (ARIZONA), INC.
|
|
AZ
|
HOLLIDAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
HOLLIDAYSBURG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
HOLLOWS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
HOLLY POINT ASSOCIATES, A KENTUCKY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
KY
|
HOMECORP INVESTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
20
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
HOPKINS VILLAGE PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
HOUSING ASSISTANCE OF MT. DORA, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HOUSING ASSISTANCE OF ORANGE CITY, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HOUSING ASSISTANCE OF SEBRING, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HOUSING ASSISTANCE OF VERO BEACH, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
HOUSING ASSOCIATES LIMITED
|
|
CA
|
HOUSING PROGRAMS CORPORATION II
|
|
DE
|
HOUSING PROGRAMS LIMITED, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
HOUSING TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES
|
|
HI
|
HUDSON STREET APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
HUDSON TERRACE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
HUMMELSTOWN HOUSING ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
HUNT CLUB PARTNERS, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
HUNTERS GLEN AP XII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
HUNTERS GLEN PHASE V GP, L.L.C.
|
|
SC
|
HUNTINGTON HACIENDA ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
HUNTSVILLE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
HURBELL IV LTD.
|
|
AL
|
HYATTSVILLE HOUSING ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
HYDE PARK APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
IDA TOWER
|
|
PA
|
IH, INC.
|
|
DE
|
INDIO GARDENS AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
INGRAM SQUARE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
INGRAM SQUARE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
INTOWN WEST ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
INWOOD COLONY, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
IPLP ACQUISITION I LLC
|
|
DE
|
IPT I LLC
|
|
DE
|
IRONMAN HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
OK
|
ISTC CORPORATION
|
|
DE
|
IVYWOOD APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
J M PROPERTY INVESTORS 1984, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
J M PROPERTY INVESTORS 1985, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
JACARANDA-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
JACARANDA-OXFORD, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
JACOBS LANDING, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
JACQUES-MILLER ASSOCIATES
|
|
TN
|
JAMES COURT ASSOCIATES
|
|
ID
|
JAMES-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
JAMESTOWN TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
JAMESTOWN VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
JARDINES DE MAYAGUEZ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
21
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
JASPER COUNTY PROPERTIES, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
JEFFERSON MEADOWS LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
JENNY LIND HALL SECOND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
JFK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
JMA EQUITIES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
JUPITER-I, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
JUPITER-II, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
KENDALL TOWNHOME INVESTORS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
KENNEDY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
KENNEDY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATES II, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
KENNEDY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATES III, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
KENNEDY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATES IV, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
KENOSHA GARDENS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF WISCONSIN
|
|
WI
|
KENTON DEVELOPMENT CO.
|
|
MO
|
KENTON VILLAGE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
KENTUCKY MANOR APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
KENTUCKY RIVER APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
KENYON HOUSE CO.
|
|
WA
|
KING-BELL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OR
|
KINGS ROW ASSOCIATES
|
|
NJ
|
KINGSTON GREENE ASSOCIATES LTD
|
|
OH
|
KINSEY-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
OH
|
KIRKMAN-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
KIRKWOOD HOUSE PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
KIWANIS MANOR, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
KOHLER GARDENS APARTMENTS
|
|
CA
|
KONA PLUS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
L.M. ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
LA BROADCAST CENTER GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA CANYON TERRACE GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA CANYON TERRACE LP
|
|
DE
|
LA CREEKSIDE GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA CREEKSIDE LP
|
|
DE
|
LA CRESCENT GARDENS GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA CRESCENT GARDENS LP
|
|
DE
|
LA HILLCRESTE APARTMENTS LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA HILLCRESTE GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA HILLCRESTE LP
|
|
DE
|
LA HILLCRESTE MEZZANINE MEMBER LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA INDIAN OAKS GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA INDIAN OAKS LP
|
|
DE
|
LA LAKES GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA LAKES LP
|
|
DE
|
22
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
LA MALIBU CANYON GP LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA MALIBU CANYON LP
|
|
DE
|
LA MORADA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
LA PARK LA BREA A LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA PARK LA BREA B LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA PARK LA BREA C LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA PARK LA BREA LLC
|
|
DE
|
LA SALLE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
LA VISTA PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
LAC PROPERTIES GP I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
LAC PROPERTIES GP I LLC
|
|
DE
|
LAC PROPERTIES GP II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
LAC PROPERTIES GP III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
LAC PROPERTIES OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
LAC PROPERTIES SUB LLC
|
|
DE
|
LAFAYETTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
LAFAYETTE MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
LAFAYETTE SQUARE ASSOCIATES
|
|
TN
|
LAFAYETTE TERRACE ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
LAFAYETTE TOWNE ELDERLY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
LAKE AVENUE ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
OH
|
LAKE CASTLETON II, L.P
|
|
TX
|
LAKE FOREST APARTMENTS
|
|
PA
|
LAKE HAVASU ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
LAKE JUNE VILLAGE II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
LAKE RIDGE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
LAKE TOWERS ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
LAKE WALES VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
LAKERIDGE-ISLAND CLUB APARTMENTS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
LAKESIDE APARTMENTS LIMITED
|
|
FL
|
LAKESIDE APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
LAKESIDE AT VININGS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
LAKESIDE NORTH, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
LAKEVIEW ARMS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
LAKEVIEW VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
LAKEWOOD AOPL, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
LAKEWOOD AOPL, INC.
|
|
TX
|
LANCASTER HEIGHTS MANAGEMENT CORP.
|
|
CA
|
LANDAU APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
LANDMARK (NC), LLC
|
|
DE
|
LANDMARK APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
LANDMARK ASSOCIATES
|
|
ID
|
LANTANA-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
LARGO PARTNERS, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
23
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
LARGO/OAC, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
LAS MONTANAS VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
LAS PALOMAS VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
LASALLE APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
LAUDERDALE TOWERS-REO, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
LAWNDALE SQUARE-REO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
LAZY HOLLOW PARTNERS
|
|
CA
|
LEE-HY MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
LEMAY VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
LEWISBURG ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
LEWISBURG ELDERLY ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
LEXINGTON-OXFORD ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
LEYDEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
LIBERTY TOWERS ASSOCIATES II L.P.
|
|
IL
|
LIMA-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
LINCOLN MARINERS ASSOCIATES LIMITED
|
|
CA
|
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY NO. 409, LTD.
|
|
CA
|
LINDEN COURT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
LIVINGSTON HOUSING 1994 PARTNERS, A LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN
COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
LOCK HAVEN ELDERLY ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
LOCK HAVEN GARDENS ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
LOCUST HOUSE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
LONE OAK APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
LONE STAR PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
LONG MEADOW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
LORELEI ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
LORING TOWERS PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
LORING TOWERS SALEM PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
LOUIS JOLIET APARTMENTS MT, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
LOUIS JOLIET APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
LUND-HILL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
LYNN-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
M & P DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
|
|
PA
|
MADISON PARK III ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
MADISON RIVER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
MADISON TERRACE ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
MADISONVILLE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
MAE SPI, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
MAE DELTA, INC.
|
|
DE
|
MAE INVESTMENTS, INC.
|
|
DE
|
MAE JMA, INC.
|
|
DE
|
MAERIL, INC.
|
|
DE
|
MALLARDS OF WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
24
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
MANDARIN TRACE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
MANGONIA RESIDENCE I, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
MANNA CREST HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
MANOR GREEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
MAPLE HILL ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
MAQUOKETA HOUSING, L.P.
|
|
IA
|
MARINA DEL REY LIMITED DIVIDEND PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
MARINETTE WOODS APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
MARKET VENTURES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
MARSHALL PLAZA APARTMENTS, LTD.-PHASE I
|
|
OH
|
MARSHALL PLAZA APARTMENTS, LTD.-PHASE II
|
|
OH
|
MARTINEZ PARK VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
CO
|
MASHPEE UNITED CHURCH VILLAGE PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
MAUNAKEA PALMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
HI
|
MAUNAKEA PALMS, INC.
|
|
HI
|
MAYER BEVERLY PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
MB APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
MCZ/CENTRUM FLAMINGO II, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
MCZ/CENTRUM FLAMINGO III, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
MEADOW LAKE PHASE II, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AR
|
MEADOW LAKE, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AR
|
MEADOW LANE
|
|
WA
|
MEADOW VIEW ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IL
|
MEADOWS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
MEADOWS RUN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CO
|
MECKLENBURG MILL ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
MEGAN MANOR, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AL
|
MELBOURNE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
MELBOURNE-OXFORD CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
MERCER PARTNERS, LP
|
|
NJ
|
MERIDIAN-REO, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
MESA BROADWAY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
MESA VALLEY HOUSING ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
MESA VALLEY HOUSING ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
METROPOLITAN PLAZA LP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
MHO PARTNERS, LIMITED
|
|
FL
|
MIAMI ELDERLY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
MICHIGAN BEACH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
MIDDLETOWN-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
MIDPARK DEVELOPMENT CO.
|
|
OH
|
MIDTOWN MESA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
MIDTOWN PLAZA ASSOCIATES
|
|
WA
|
MINNEAPOLIS ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
MINNEAPOLIS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
25
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
MIRAMAR HOUSING ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
MOHAVE PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
OH
|
MONROE CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
MONROE COUNTY APTS. 2 & 3 L.P.
|
|
IL
|
MONROE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
MONTBLANC GARDEN APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
MONTICELLO MANAGEMENT I, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
MONTICELLO MANOR, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
MORNINGSIDE HOUSING PHASE B ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
MORNINGSTAR SENIOR CITIZEN URBAN RENEWAL HOUSING GROUP,
L.P.
|
|
NJ
|
MORRISANIA TOWERS HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
MORTON TOWERS APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
MORTON TOWERS HEALTH CLUB, LLC
|
|
DE
|
MOSS GARDENS LTD., A PARTNERSHIP IN COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
MOUNT CARROLL APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
MOUNT UNION APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
MRR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
MULBERRY ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
MUSCATINE HOUSING, L.P.
|
|
IA
|
NAPICO HOUSING CREDIT COMPANY-XI.A, LLC
|
|
DE
|
NAPICO HOUSING CREDIT COMPANY-XI.B, LLC
|
|
DE
|
NAPICO HOUSING CREDIT COMPANY-XI.C, LLC
|
|
DE
|
NAPICO HOUSING CREDIT COMPANY-XI.D, LLC
|
|
DE
|
NAPLES-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
NAPLES-OXFORD, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
NASHUA-OXFORD-BAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
NATIONAL BOSTON LOFTS ASSOCIATES, LLLP
|
|
CO
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND II, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND III, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND IV, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND IX, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND V, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND VI, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND VII, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND X, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
26
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND XI, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND XII, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND XIII, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT FUND, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC.
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. II
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. III
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. IV
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. IX
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. OF PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
PA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. VI
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. VII
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. VIII
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. X
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. XI
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. XII
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. XIII
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. XIV
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP REALTY FUND I, A MARYLAND
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP RESI ASSOCIATES I LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP CREDIT FACILITY CORP.
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENTS ASSOCIATES II
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENTS CORP.
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP MANAGEMENT CORP.
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 5
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT INVESTORS II, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP. I
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT, INC
|
|
CA
|
NATIONAL TAX CREDIT, INC. II
|
|
CA
|
NBA, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
NEIGHBORHOOD RESTORATIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP V
|
|
PA
|
NEVADA SUNRISE GARDENS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NEW BALTIMORE SENIOR PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
NEW CASTLE OXFORD ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
NEW HAVEN APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AL
|
NEW HAVEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
27
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
NEW SHELTER V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
NEW VISTAS APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
NEW-BEL-MO ENTERPRISES A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
NEWBERRY PARK PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NEWINGTON-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
NEWPORT-AVONDALE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
NEWPORT-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
NEWTON APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
NHP A&R SERVICES, INC.
|
|
VA
|
NHP ACQUISITION CORPORATION
|
|
DE
|
NHP AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
NHP COUNTRY GARDENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
NHP COUNTRY GARDENS, INC.
|
|
VA
|
NHP MID-ATLANTIC PARTNERS ONE L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHP MID-ATLANTIC PARTNERS TWO L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHP MULTI-FAMILY CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
DC
|
NHP PARKWAY ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHP PARKWAY L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHP PARTNERS TWO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
NHP PUERTO RICO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
|
|
DE
|
NHP WINDSOR CROSSING ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHP WINDSOR CROSSING L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHP-HDV FOURTEEN, INC.
|
|
DE
|
NHP-HDV SEVENTEEN, INC.
|
|
DE
|
NHP-HDV TEN, INC.
|
|
DE
|
NHP-HDV TWELVE, INC.
|
|
DE
|
NHPMN MANAGEMENT, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
NHPMN MANAGEMENT, LLC
|
|
DE
|
NHPMN STATE MANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
DE
|
NHPMN-GP, INC.
|
|
DE
|
NICHOLS TOWNEHOMES, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
NOBLE SENIOR HOUSING, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
NORTH GATE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
NORTH LIBERTY PARK, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
NORTH OMAHA HOMES
|
|
NE
|
NORTH PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
NORTH WASHINGTON PARK ESTATES
|
|
IL
|
NORTH WOODS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
NORTHERN STATES PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
NORTHPOINT PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
NORTHWESTERN PARTNERS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
NORTHWIND FOREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
NORTHWINDS APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
VA
|
NORWALK PARK APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IA
|
28
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
NOVA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
NP BANK LOFTS ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
CO
|
NPI EQUITY INVESTMENTS II, INC.
|
|
FL
|
NPI EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
|
|
FL
|
NPIA III, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
OAC L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OAC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OAK FALLS CONDOMINIUMS JV, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
OAK FOREST ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
OAK FOREST II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
OAK FOREST III ASSOCIATES
|
|
OH
|
OAK HILL APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
PA
|
OAK HOLLOW SOUTH ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
OAK PARK-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
OAK VIEW SPARTANBURG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
OAK WOODS ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
OAKBROOK ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
OAKLAND CITY WEST END ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
OAKRIDGE PARK APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
OAKRIDGE PARK APARTMENTS, PHASE II, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
OAKVIEW APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AR
|
OAKWOOD APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PHASE I
|
|
OH
|
OAKWOOD APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PHASE II
|
|
OH
|
OAKWOOD MANOR ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
TN
|
OAKWOOD TRUST PHASE I
|
|
OH
|
OAKWOOD TRUST PHASE II
|
|
OH
|
OAMCO I, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO II, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO IV, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO V, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO VII, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO X, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XI, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XII, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XIX, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XIX, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XV, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XVI, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XX, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XX, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XXII, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XXIII, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
OAMCO XXVIII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OCALA PLACE, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
29
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
ODEA INVESTMENT COMPANY
|
|
CA
|
OFA PARTNERS
|
|
PA
|
OHA ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
OLD FARM ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
OLD FINANCIAL DISTRICT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
ONE LINWOOD ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
DC
|
ONE LYTLE PLACE APARTMENTS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
ONE MADISON AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
ME
|
ONE WEST CONWAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
OP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC
|
|
DE
|
OPPORTUNITY ASSOCIATES 1991 L.P.
|
|
IN
|
OPPORTUNITY ASSOCIATES 1994, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
ORANGE CITY VILLAS II, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
ORANGE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
ORLEANS GARDENS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
OROCOVIX LIMITED DIVIDEND PARTNERSHIP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
ORP ACQUISITION PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ORP ACQUISITION, INC.
|
|
MD
|
ORP CORPORATION I
|
|
MD
|
ORP I ASSIGNOR CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
ORP ONE L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OSHTEMO LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
OTEF II ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OVERBROOK PARK, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 76 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 77 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 78 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 79 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 80 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 81 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 82 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 83 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 84 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD ASSOCIATES 85 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD BETHESDA I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD BETHESDA II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD CORPORATION
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES INC.
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD EQUITIES CORPORATION
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD EQUITIES CORPORATION II
|
|
DE
|
OXFORD FUND I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
30
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
OXFORD HOUSE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
OXFORD INVESTMENT CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD INVESTMENT II CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC.
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD MANAGERS I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD NATIONAL PROPERTIES CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD PARTNERS I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
OXFORD PARTNERS V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD PARTNERS X, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD REALTY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
OXFORD TAX EXEMPT FUND II CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD TAX EXEMPT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXFORD-COLUMBIA ASSOCIATES, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 1994, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 1995, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 1996, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 1997, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 1998, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 1999, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
OXPARC 2000, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
P&R INVESTMENT SERVICES
|
|
WA
|
PACHUTA, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
PACIFIC COAST PLAZA
|
|
CA
|
PACIFIC PLACE APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
PALACE VIEW HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
PALM AIRE-ISLAND CLUB APARTMENTS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
PALM BEACH-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
PALM SPRINGS SENIOR AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
PALM SPRINGS SENIOR CITIZENS COMPLEX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
PALM SPRINGS VIEW APARTMENTS, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
PALMETTO APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
PAMPA PARTNERSHIP LIMITED
|
|
TX
|
PANORAMA PARK APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
PANORAMA PARK PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
PAP PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
PARADISE PALMS MULTI-HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PARADISE PALMS SENIOR HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PARC CHATEAU SECTION I ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
GA
|
PARC CHATEAU SECTION II ASSOCIATES (L.P.)
|
|
GA
|
PARK ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
KS
|
PARK ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
PARK CREST, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
31
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
PARK LA BREA ACQUISITION, LLC
|
|
DE
|
PARK LANE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PARK MANOR, OREG. LTD.
|
|
OR
|
PARK NORTH-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
PARK PLACE ASSOCIATES
|
|
NJ
|
PARK PLACE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
PARK TOWNE PLACE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
PARK VISTA MANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
CA
|
PARK VISTA, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
PARKVIEW AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
PARKVIEW APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
PARKVIEW ARMS ASSOCIATES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
PARKVIEW ARMS ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
PARKVIEW ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
PARKVIEW ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
PARKVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO.
|
|
MN
|
PARKWAYS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
PARTNERSHIP 18, L.P.
|
|
PA
|
PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING LIMITED
|
|
CA
|
PATEE VILLAS I, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
PAVILION ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
PAVILION PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
PEAK AT VININGS, LLC
|
|
DE
|
PEBBLE POINT CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
PEBBLE POINT-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING PARTNERS
|
|
PA
|
PENVIEW ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
NY
|
PEPPERMILL PLACE APARTMENTS JV, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
PEPPERTREE ASSOCIATES
|
|
CA
|
PEPPERTREE VILLAGE OF AVON PARK, LIMITED
|
|
FL
|
PETERSBURG EAST SECTION 1, L.P.
|
|
VA
|
PHILLIPS TO THE FALLS, L.L.C.
|
|
SD
|
PHILLIPS VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
PHOENIX BROADWAY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PHOENIX VINEYARD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PINE BLUFF ASSOCIATES, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
PINE BLUFF VILLAGE PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
PINE CREEK APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
PINE HAVEN APARTMENTS, LTD. A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
PINE LAKE TERRACE ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
CA
|
PINE TREE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
PINELLAS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
PINERIDGE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
32
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
PINERIDGE MANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
CA
|
PINETREE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
PINEVIEW TERRACE I, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
PINEWOOD PARK APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
PINEWOOD PLACE APARTMENTS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
PINEWOOD, LTD. (CLARKE, L.P.)
|
|
GA
|
PINEY BRANCH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
PLAINS VILLAGE, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
PLAINVIEW GP, INC.
|
|
DE
|
PLEASANT HILL PRESERVATION, LP
|
|
TX
|
PLEASANT HILL VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
CO
|
PLUMLY TOWNEHOMES, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
PLUMMER VILLAGE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
POINT VILLAGE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
POPLAR POINTE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AL
|
PORTAGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES EIGHT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES SEVEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES TEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
PORTNER PLACE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
POST RIDGE ASSOCIATES, LTD., LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
POST STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
PRESCOTT EQUITIES HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PRIDE GARDENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MS
|
PRINCE STREET TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
PTP PROPERTIES, INC.
|
|
DE
|
PUERTO RICO MANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
CA
|
PUL-CORAL GARDENS APARTMENTS LIMTED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
PULLMAN WHEELWORKS ASSOCIATES I
|
|
IL
|
QUAIL RUN ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
QUEENSGATE II ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
QUEENSTOWN APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
QUINCY AFFORDABLE HOUSING L.P.
|
|
IL
|
QUIVIRA MANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
CA
|
QUIVIRA PLACE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
KS
|
RAMBLEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
RAMBLEWOOD RESIDENTIAL JV GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
RAMBLEWOOD RESIDENTIAL JV, LLC
|
|
DE
|
RAMBLEWOOD SERVICES LLC
|
|
DE
|
RANCHO DEL MAR APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
RANCHO TOWNHOUSES ASSOCIATES
|
|
CA
|
RAVENSWORTH ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES III
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES IV
|
|
CA
|
33
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED II
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED III
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED IV
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED V
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VI
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED VII
|
|
CA
|
REAL ESTATE EQUITY PARTNERS INC.
|
|
DE
|
REAL ESTATE EQUITY PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LIMITED
|
|
CA
|
REDBIRD TRAILS ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
REDMOND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
KY
|
REEDY RIVER PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
REGENCY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
REGENCY-NATIONAL CORPORATE TAX CREDIT, INC. II
|
|
OH
|
RHDC-1, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
RHDC-2, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
RI-15 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
RICHARDS PARK APARTMENTS
|
|
OH
|
RICHARDS PARK APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
RICHLAND SENIOR ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
RICHLIEU ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
RIDGEMONT GROUP, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
RIDGEWOOD TOWERS ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
RIDGEWOOD TOWERS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
RIVER FRONT APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
RIVER LOFT APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
RIVER LOFT ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
RIVER OAKS ASSOCIATES
|
|
TX
|
RIVER REACH COMMUNITY SERVICES ASSOCIATION, INC.
|
|
FL
|
RIVER RIDGE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
RIVER VILLAGE PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
RIVERCREST APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
SC
|
RIVERPOINT ASSOCIATES
|
|
RI
|
RIVERS EDGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING
ASSOCIATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
RIVERSIDE PARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
RIVERWOODS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
RL AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
ROCK FALLS ELDERLY LIVING CENTER, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
ROCKVILLE ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
ROCKY CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
ROLLING HILLS APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
ROOSEVELT GARDENS APARTMENTS II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
34
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
ROOSEVELT GARDENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
ROSEWOOD APARTMENTS CORPORATION
|
|
CA
|
ROUND BARN MANOR PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
ROWLAND HEIGHTS II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
ROYAL CREST ESTATES (MARLBORO), L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
ROYAL DE LEON APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
ROYAL PALM LAKES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
ROYAL SHORE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
HI
|
RUTHERFORD PARK TOWNHOUSES ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
SABINE HOUSING 1994 PARTNERS A LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
SAGINAW VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OR
|
SALEM MANOR OREG. LTD.
|
|
OR
|
SALEM PARK, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AK
|
SAN BRUNO-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
SAN JOSE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
SANDY PINES, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
SANDY SPRINGS ASSOCIATES, LIMITED
|
|
GA
|
SANS SOUCI-REO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
SANTA MARIA LIMITED DIVIDEND PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
SAUK-KO ENTERPRISES A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
SCANDIA ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
SCHAUMBURG-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
SEASIDE POINT PARTNERS, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
SEATTLE ROCHESTER AVENUE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
SEAVIEW TOWERS ASSOCIATES
|
|
NY
|
SECURED INCOME L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SECURITY MANAGEMENT INC.
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 73
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 74
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 74 II
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 74 III
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES
74-A
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 75
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 76
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 77
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 77A
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 78
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 78A
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 79
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 79-II
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 80
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES 81
|
|
WA
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES
81-A
|
|
WA
|
35
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
SECURITY PROPERTIES FHA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MT
|
SEMINOLE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
SEMINOLE-OXFORD CORPORATION
|
|
MD
|
SENCIT F/G METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATES
|
|
NJ
|
SENCIT NEW YORK AVENUE ASSOCIATES
|
|
NJ
|
SENCIT TOWNE HOUSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
SENCIT-LEBANON COMPANY
|
|
PA
|
SENCIT-SELINSGROVE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
SERENDIPITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MT
|
SEWARD ASSOCIATES, AN IDAHO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
ID
|
SHARP-LEADENHALL ASSOCIATES, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
SHAWNEE MEADOWS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
SHELTER IV GP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER PROPERTIES IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER PROPERTIES V LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER REALTY II CORPORATION
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER REALTY IV CORPORATION
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER REALTY V CORPORATION
|
|
SC
|
SHELTER V GP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
SHENANDOAH CROSSINGS, L.P.
|
|
VA
|
SHERIDAN PLAZA ASSOCIATES II L.P.
|
|
IL
|
SHERMAN TERRACE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
SHOCKOE PLACE APARTMENTS, LLC
|
|
VA
|
SHOREVIEW APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
SHOREVIEW PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
SHUBUTA PROPERTIES, LTD.
|
|
MS
|
SIERRA MEADOWS, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
SIGNATURE MIDWEST, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SIGNATURE POINT JOINT VENTURE
|
|
TX
|
SIGNATURE POINT PARTNERS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
SILVER HILL MILL DAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
SITKA III ASSOCIATES, AN IDAHO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
ID
|
SJT ASSOCIATES, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
SNI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
SOL 413 LIMITED DIVIDEND PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
SOLDOTNA ASSOCIATES, AN IDAHO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
ID
|
SOUTH BAY VILLA PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
SOUTH BRITTANY OAKS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SOUTH HIAWASSEE VILLAGE, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
SOUTH LA MANCHA, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SOUTH LANDMARK PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
SOUTH MILL ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
SOUTH PARK APARTMENTS
|
|
OH
|
36
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
SOUTH PARK APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
SOUTH WINDRUSH PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING II, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING VI, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING X, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING XII, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING XIV, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING XIX, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHERN MISSOURI HOUSING XVI, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
SOUTHRIDGE-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
SOUTHWEST ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SP MID TERM INCOME FUND, LTD.
|
|
WA
|
SP PROPERTIES 1982 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
SP PROPERTIES 1983 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
SP PROPERTIES 1983 TWO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
SP PROPERTIES 1984 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
SPRINGDALE WEST
|
|
CA
|
SPRINGFIELD FACILITIES, LLC
|
|
MD
|
SPRINGFIELD VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
SPRINGHAVEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
SPYGLASS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
ST. GEORGE VILLAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
ST. MARYS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
STAFFORD STUDENT APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
STANDPOINT VISTA ASSOCIATES
|
|
SC
|
STANDPOINT VISTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
STEEPLECHASE (AILKEN) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
STERLING CREST JOINT VENTURE
|
|
TN
|
STERLING GROVE L.P.
|
|
TX
|
STERLING TOWERS ASSOCIATES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
STERLING VILLAGE AFFORDABLE, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
STEWARTOWN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
STONEGATE PARK APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
STRATEGIC CAPITAL ALLIANCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
STRATFORD VILLAGE REALTY TRUST
|
|
MA
|
STRAWBRIDGE SQUARE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
STRUM AFFORDABLE HOUSING, LLC
|
|
WI
|
STUYVESANT LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PARTNERS
|
|
CA
|
SUGAR RIVER MILLS ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
SUGARBERRY APARTMENTS CORPORATION
|
|
CA
|
SUMMER CROSSINGS 40, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
SUMMIT OAKS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SUMMIT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES I, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
37
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
SUMMIT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES II, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SUMMIT TAX CREDIT PROPERTIES III, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
SUN TERRACE ASSOCIATES
|
|
AZ
|
SUNBURY DOWNS APARTMENTS JV, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
SUNSET SILVER BOW APARTMENTS
|
|
MT
|
SUNTREE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
SUSQUEHANNA VIEW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
TAMARAC PINES PRESERVATION, LP
|
|
TX
|
TAMARAC VILLAGE, LLC
|
|
DE
|
TAUNTON GREEN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
TAUNTON II ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
TENNESSEE TRUST COMPANY
|
|
TN
|
TERAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
AZ
|
TERRA II LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
TERRACE INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
TERRY MANOR PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
TEXAS BIRCHWOOD APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
TEXAS BROOK APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
TEXAS KIRNWOOD APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
TEXAS MELODY APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
TEXAS-ESTRADA APARTMENTS L.P.
|
|
TX
|
THE BRANFORD GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
THE GLENS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
THE HOUSTON RECOVERY FUND JV GP, LLC
|
|
DE
|
THE HOUSTON RECOVERY FUND JV, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
THE NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
THE NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP II TRUST
|
|
NY
|
THE NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERSHIP-II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
THE NEW FAIRWAYS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
THE OAK PARK PARTNERSHIP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
THE OAKS APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
THE PARK AT CEDAR LAWN, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
THE TAILORED LADY APARTMENTS PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
THE TERRACES ASSOCIATES L.P.
|
|
IN
|
THE VILLA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WI
|
THE VILLAGE OF KAUFMAN, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
THE WOODLANDS LIMITED
|
|
MI
|
THE WOODS ASSOCIATES
|
|
IL
|
THIBODAUX HOUSING 1994 PARTNERS, A LOUISIANA PARTNERSHIP IN
COMMENDAM
|
|
LA
|
THREE FOUNTAINS LIMITED
|
|
MI
|
TIDEWATER-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
TIMBERLAKE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
TOMPKINS TERRACE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
38
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
TOMPKINS TERRACE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
TOMPKINS TERRACE, INC.
|
|
NY
|
TORRES DEL PLATA I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
TORRES DEL PLATA II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
TORRIES CHASE ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
KS
|
TOWER OF DAVID LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SD
|
TOWN & COUNTRY CLUB APARTMENTS
|
|
MT
|
TOWN ONE PHASE II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SD
|
TOWN ONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SD
|
TOWN VIEW TOWERS I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
TOWNSHIP AT HIGHLANDS LLC
|
|
DE
|
TRADEWINDS EAST ASSOCIATES, LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
|
|
MI
|
TRADEWINDS HAMMOCKS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
TRAVIS ONE-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
TROON APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
TRUMAN TOWERS, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
TUJUNGA GARDENS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
TURNBUERRY-REO, L.P.
|
|
TX
|
TWELFTH STREET APARTMENTS, L.P.
|
|
IL
|
TWIN GABLES ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
TWIN OAKS VILLAS, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
TYRONE ELDERLY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
PA
|
U. S. REALTY I CORPORATION
|
|
SC
|
U. S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
U.S. SHELTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
UNDERWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CT
|
UNDERWOOD-OXFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ONE
|
|
CT
|
UNITED HOUSING PARTNERS ELMWOOD, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
UNITED HOUSING PARTNERS CUTHBERT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
UNITED HOUSING PARTNERS MORRISTOWN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
UNITED HOUSING PARTNERS-CARBONDALE, L.P.
|
|
TN
|
UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES (A MISSOURI LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP)
|
|
MO
|
UNITED INVESTORS REAL ESTATE, INC.
|
|
DE
|
UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING NEIGHBORHOOD RESTORATIONS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IV
|
|
PA
|
UNIVERSITY PLAZA ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
UPTOWN VILLAGE, LIMITED
|
|
OH
|
URBANA VILLAGE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
URBANIZACION MARIA LOPEZ HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NY
|
UTOPIA ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
VALEBROOK ASSOCIATES
|
|
MA
|
VALLEY OAKS SENIOR HOUSING ASSOCIATES
|
|
CA
|
VAN NUYS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
VAN NUYS PRESERVATION MT, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
39
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
VAN NUYS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
VERDES DEL ORIENTE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
VICTORIA ARMS APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
VICTORY SQUARE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
VILLA DE GUADALUPE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
CA
|
VILLA DEL NORTE ASSOCIATES
|
|
TX
|
VILLA DEL NORTE II ASSOCIATES
|
|
TX
|
VILLA DEL SOL ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
VILLA FLORENTINA, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
VILLA NOVA, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TN
|
VILLAGE APARTMENT, LTD.
|
|
TN
|
VILLAGE EAST TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MO
|
VILLAGE OAKS-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
VILLAGE SOUTH ASSOCIATES
|
|
OH
|
VINEVILLE TOWERS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
GA
|
VIRGINIA PARK MEADOWS LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION
LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
VISTA DEL LAGOS JOINT VENTURE
|
|
AZ
|
VISTA HOUSING ASSOCIATES
|
|
CA
|
VISTA PARK CHINO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
VISTULA HERITAGE VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
WAI ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
TX
|
WALNUT CREEK PARTNERS, LIMITED
|
|
OH
|
WALNUT HILLS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WALTON-PERRY LIMITED
|
|
MI
|
WASCO ARMS
|
|
CA
|
WASHINGTON CHINATOWN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DC
|
WASHINGTON SQUARE WEST PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WASH-WEST PROPERTIES
|
|
PA
|
WATERFORD TOWNHOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
WATERFORD VILLAGE, L.L.C.
|
|
DE
|
WATERGATE II ASSOCIATES
|
|
NY
|
WATERS LANDING PARTNERS, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
WAYCROSS, L.P.
|
|
GA
|
WEDGEWOOD CLUB ESTATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
WEST LAFAYETTE, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
WEST LAKE ARMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
WEST VIRGINIAN MANOR ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
WESTBURY GROUP, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
WESTBURY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
WESTGATE (SPARTANBURG) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
WESTGATE APARTMENTS
|
|
GA
|
WESTGATE APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MN
|
WESTGATE APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
40
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
WESTLAND APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
WESTMINISTER PROPERTIES, LTD.
|
|
WA
|
WESTMINSTER COMMONS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
VA
|
WESTMINSTER OAKS PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WESTRIDGE-OXFORD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
WESTWICK II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MS
|
WESTWOOD PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WESTWOOD TERRACE PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WESTWOOD TERRACE SECOND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
WF-AC TAX CREDIT FUND I, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WF-AC TAX CREDIT FUND I, LLC
|
|
DE
|
WF-AC TAX CREDIT FUND II, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WF-AC TAX CREDIT FUND III, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WHITE CLIFF APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
OH
|
WHITEFIELD PLACE PRESERVATION, LP
|
|
TX
|
WICKFORD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
WILDERNESS TRAIL, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
WILIKINA PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
HI
|
WILKES TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
WILLIAMSBURG ACQUISITION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
WILLIAMSBURG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
WILLIAMSON TOWERS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WV
|
WILLOW COURT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MT
|
WILLOW WOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
CA
|
WINCHESTER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, LTD.
|
|
KY
|
WIND DRIFT-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
WINDING BROOK ASSOCIATES
|
|
IN
|
WINDMILL RUN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
WINDSOR CROSSINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NJ
|
WINNSBORO ARMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
WINONA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
WA
|
WINROCK-HOUSTON ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
WINROCK-HOUSTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
DE
|
WINTER GARDEN PRESERVATION, L.P.
|
|
MO
|
WINTHROP APARTMENT INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
WINTHROP TEXAS INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
WL/OAC, L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
WMOP PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WOLF RIDGE, LTD.
|
|
AL
|
WOOD CREEK CPGF 22, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WOODCREST APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
OK
|
WOODCREST APARTMENTS, LTD.
|
|
TX
|
WOODCROFT II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
WOODLAKE ASSOCIATES
|
|
WA
|
41
|
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
State Code
|
|
WOODLAND APARTMENTS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
SC
|
WOODLAND HILLS PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MI
|
WOODS EDGE-OXFORD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
|
|
IN
|
WOODS MORTGAGE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
WOODS OF INVERNESS CPF 16, L.P.
|
|
DE
|
WOODSIDE VILLAS OF ARCADIA, LTD.
|
|
FL
|
WORCESTER EPISCOPAL HOUSING COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MA
|
WRC-87A CORPORATION
|
|
DE
|
WYNNEFIELD LINCOLN GROVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
WYNTRE BROOKE ASSOCIATES
|
|
PA
|
YADKIN ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
YELLOW CREEK GLEN FAMILY HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IL
|
YORKVIEW ESTATES, LTD.
|
|
OH
|
ZELOTES HOLMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
NC
|
ZICKLER ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
IN
|
ZIMCO CORPORATION IV
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO II L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO IX L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO V L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO VIII L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO X L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XI L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XIII L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XIV L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XIX L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XVI L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XVII L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XVIII L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XX L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XXV L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XXVII L.L.C.
|
|
MD
|
ZIMCO XXXII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
MD
|
42
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the amended
Registration Statements
(Forms S-3ASR
No. 333-150341-01
and
Forms S-4
No. 333-60355-01
and
333-136801-01)
of AIMCO Properties, L.P. and in the related Prospectuses of our
reports dated February 26, 2010 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of AIMCO
Properties, L.P., and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of AIMCO Properties, L.P., both included in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2010
43
Exhibit 31.1
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
I, Terry Considine, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K
of AIMCO Properties, L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Terry Considine
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(equivalent of the chief executive officer of
AIMCO Properties, L.P.)
Date: February 26, 2010
44
Exhibit 31.2
CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
I, Ernest M. Freedman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K
of AIMCO Properties, L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(equivalent of the chief financial officer of
AIMCO Properties, L.P.)
Date: February 26, 2010
45
Exhibit 32.1
Certification
of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of AIMCO Properties, L.P.
(the Partnership) on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Terry Considine, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Partnership hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Partnership.
Terry Considine
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(equivalent of the chief executive officer of
AIMCO Properties, L.P.)
February 26, 2010
46
Exhibit 32.2
Certification
of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of AIMCO Properties, L.P.
(the Partnership) on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ernest M. Freedman, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Partnership hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Partnership.
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(equivalent of the chief financial officer of
AIMCO Properties, L.P.)
February 26, 2010
47
Exhibit 99.1
Agreement
Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt Instruments
In reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of
Regulation S-K,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
Partnership), has not filed as an exhibit to its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2009, any instrument with
respect to long-term debt not being registered where the total
amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed ten
percent of the total assets of the Partnership and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to
Item 601(b) (4) (iii) (A) of
Regulation S-K,
the Partnership hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such
agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc., its general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Ernest
M. Freedman
|
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
48
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2010
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
0-24497
AIMCO Properties,
L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
84-1275621
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
80237
(Zip Code)
|
(303) 757-8101
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address,
and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of Partnership Common Units outstanding as of
October 28, 2010: 122,907,406
H-1
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q
H-2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
$
|
7,419,643
|
|
|
$
|
7,242,051
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,166,213
|
|
|
|
2,148,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
9,585,856
|
|
|
|
9,390,440
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,899,962
|
)
|
|
|
(2,594,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate ($895,736 and $855,170 related to VIEs)
|
|
|
6,685,894
|
|
|
|
6,795,896
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents ($31,444 and $23,366 related to VIEs)
|
|
|
145,062
|
|
|
|
81,260
|
|
Restricted cash ($58,816 and $56,183 related to VIEs)
|
|
|
216,369
|
|
|
|
218,981
|
|
Accounts receivable, net ($18,177 and $20,766 related to VIEs)
|
|
|
48,131
|
|
|
|
59,822
|
|
Accounts receivable from affiliates, net
|
|
|
11,038
|
|
|
|
23,744
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
49,958
|
|
|
|
50,807
|
|
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships,
net
|
|
|
12,427
|
|
|
|
14,295
|
|
Notes receivable from non-affiliates, net
|
|
|
128,381
|
|
|
|
125,269
|
|
Notes receivable from Aimco
|
|
|
17,013
|
|
|
|
16,371
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships ($74,118
and $99,460 related to VIEs)
|
|
|
78,125
|
|
|
|
104,193
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
180,518
|
|
|
|
185,816
|
|
Deferred income tax assets, net
|
|
|
55,290
|
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
5,179
|
|
|
|
203,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,633,385
|
|
|
$
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
Non-recourse property tax-exempt bond financing ($217,555 and
$211,691 related to VIEs)
|
|
$
|
548,502
|
|
|
$
|
574,926
|
|
Non-recourse property loans payable ($456,336 and $390,601
related to VIEs)
|
|
|
4,940,829
|
|
|
|
4,823,165
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Other borrowings ($18,032 and $15,665 related to VIEs)
|
|
|
53,231
|
|
|
|
53,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
|
5,542,562
|
|
|
|
5,541,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
23,879
|
|
|
|
29,819
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other ($93,880 and $62,503 related to
VIEs)
|
|
|
289,429
|
|
|
|
286,326
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
152,533
|
|
|
|
179,433
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
35,833
|
|
|
|
34,491
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
|
|
183,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,050,727
|
|
|
|
6,255,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred units
|
|
|
103,537
|
|
|
|
116,656
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred units
|
|
|
758,601
|
|
|
|
660,500
|
|
General Partner and Special Limited Partner
|
|
|
339,350
|
|
|
|
521,692
|
|
Limited Partners
|
|
|
126,976
|
|
|
|
95,990
|
|
High Performance Units
|
|
|
(43,421
|
)
|
|
|
(40,313
|
)
|
Investment in Aimco Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
(4,453
|
)
|
|
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital attributable to the Partnership
|
|
|
1,177,053
|
|
|
|
1,233,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
302,068
|
|
|
|
317,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
1,479,121
|
|
|
|
1,550,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital
|
|
$
|
7,633,385
|
|
|
$
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
H-3
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
$
|
282,595
|
|
|
$
|
275,072
|
|
|
$
|
845,620
|
|
|
$
|
827,379
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
9,707
|
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
23,560
|
|
|
|
32,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
292,302
|
|
|
|
285,397
|
|
|
|
869,180
|
|
|
|
859,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
128,174
|
|
|
|
133,224
|
|
|
|
395,864
|
|
|
|
391,021
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
107,309
|
|
|
|
110,290
|
|
|
|
322,393
|
|
|
|
321,661
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,096
|
|
|
|
12,772
|
|
|
|
39,015
|
|
|
|
43,612
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
12,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
254,869
|
|
|
|
268,202
|
|
|
|
770,635
|
|
|
|
783,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
37,433
|
|
|
|
17,195
|
|
|
|
98,545
|
|
|
|
76,747
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
8,185
|
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
(Provision for) recovery of losses on notes receivable, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(77,917
|
)
|
|
|
(76,778
|
)
|
|
|
(235,376
|
)
|
|
|
(236,798
|
)
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
(15,522
|
)
|
|
|
(3,658
|
)
|
|
|
(10,571
|
)
|
|
|
(7,507
|
)
|
Impairment losses related to unconsolidated real estate
partnerships
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(1,273
|
)
|
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
5,440
|
|
|
|
18,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(52,614
|
)
|
|
|
(57,479
|
)
|
|
|
(135,320
|
)
|
|
|
(143,105
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
4,649
|
|
|
|
2,725
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(47,965
|
)
|
|
|
(54,754
|
)
|
|
|
(123,302
|
)
|
|
|
(135,431
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
19,699
|
|
|
|
45,404
|
|
|
|
68,532
|
|
|
|
86,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(28,266
|
)
|
|
|
(9,350
|
)
|
|
|
(54,770
|
)
|
|
|
(49,142
|
)
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
11,213
|
|
|
|
(19,254
|
)
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
(24,665
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnership
|
|
|
(17,053
|
)
|
|
|
(28,604
|
)
|
|
|
(52,975
|
)
|
|
|
(73,807
|
)
|
Net income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders
|
|
|
(13,492
|
)
|
|
|
(14,731
|
)
|
|
|
(39,918
|
)
|
|
|
(42,189
|
)
|
Net income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(30,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,335
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92,893
|
)
|
|
$
|
(115,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and diluted
(Note 6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common units outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
124,739
|
|
|
|
124,376
|
|
|
|
124,601
|
|
|
|
122,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common unit
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
H-4
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(54,770
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,142
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
322,393
|
|
|
|
321,661
|
|
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
(5,440
|
)
|
|
|
(18,156
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
(61,554
|
)
|
|
|
(42,677
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
15,024
|
|
|
|
16,232
|
|
Net changes in operating assets and operating liabilities
|
|
|
(25,484
|
)
|
|
|
(90,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
190,169
|
|
|
|
137,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(130,790
|
)
|
|
|
(217,891
|
)
|
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate
|
|
|
143,719
|
|
|
|
562,743
|
|
Proceeds from sales of interests in and distributions from
unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
11,792
|
|
|
|
18,241
|
|
Purchases of partnership interests and other assets
|
|
|
(6,782
|
)
|
|
|
(3,954
|
)
|
Originations of notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate
partnerships
|
|
|
(968
|
)
|
|
|
(5,386
|
)
|
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
4,703
|
|
Net increase in cash from consolidation and deconsolidation of
entities (Note 2)
|
|
|
13,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions received from Aimco
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
9,745
|
|
|
|
27,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
41,693
|
|
|
|
386,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from property loans
|
|
|
167,367
|
|
|
|
616,293
|
|
Principal repayments on property loans
|
|
|
(177,452
|
)
|
|
|
(844,696
|
)
|
Principal repayments on tax-exempt bond financing
|
|
|
(35,843
|
)
|
|
|
(122,128
|
)
|
Payments on term loans
|
|
|
(90,000
|
)
|
|
|
(140,000
|
)
|
Net borrowings on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,070
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred units
|
|
|
96,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of preferred units
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
Proceeds from Aimco Class A Common Stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of distributions to preferred units
|
|
|
(43,816
|
)
|
|
|
(44,544
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to General Partner and Special Limited
Partner
|
|
|
(35,195
|
)
|
|
|
(84,224
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to Limited Partners
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
(14,808
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to High Performance Units
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
(5,346
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(37,635
|
)
|
|
|
(71,133
|
)
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(3,892
|
)
|
|
|
(16,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(168,060
|
)
|
|
|
(716,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
63,802
|
|
|
|
(192,642
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
81,260
|
|
|
|
299,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
145,062
|
|
|
$
|
107,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
H-5
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or the
Partnership, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries was
formed on May 16, 1994 to conduct the business of
acquiring, redeveloping, leasing, and managing multifamily
apartment properties. Our securities include Partnership Common
Units, or common OP Units, Partnership Preferred Units, or
preferred OP Units, and High Performance Partnership Units,
or High Performance Units, which are collectively referred to as
OP Units. Apartment Investment and Management
Company, or Aimco, is the owner of our general partner,
AIMCO-GP, Inc., or the General Partner, and special limited
partner, AIMCO-LP Trust, or the Special Limited Partner. The
General Partner and Special Limited Partner hold common
OP Units and are the primary holders of outstanding
preferred OP Units. Limited Partners refers to
individuals or entities that are our limited partners, other
than Aimco, the General Partner or the Special Limited Partner,
and own common OP Units or preferred OP Units.
Generally, after holding the common OP Units for one year,
the Limited Partners have the right to redeem their common
OP Units for cash, subject to our prior right to cause
Aimco to acquire some or all of the common OP Units
tendered for redemption in exchange for shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units redeemed for
Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally exchanged on a
one-for-one
basis (subject to antidilution adjustments). Preferred
OP Units and High Performance Units may or may not be
redeemable based on their respective terms, as provided for in
the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of AIMCO Properties, L.P., as amended, or the Partnership
Agreement.
We, through our operating divisions and subsidiaries, hold
substantially all of Aimcos assets and manage the daily
operations of Aimcos business and assets. Aimco is
required to contribute all proceeds from offerings of its
securities to us. In addition, substantially all of Aimcos
assets must be owned through the Partnership; therefore, Aimco
is generally required to contribute all assets acquired to us.
In exchange for the contribution of offering proceeds or assets,
Aimco receives additional interests in us with similar terms
(e.g., if Aimco contributes proceeds of a preferred stock
offering, Aimco (through the General Partner and Special Limited
Partner) receives preferred OP Units with terms
substantially similar to the preferred securities issued by
Aimco).
Aimco frequently consummates transactions for our benefit. For
legal, tax or other business reasons, Aimco may hold title or
ownership of certain assets until they can be transferred to us.
However, we have a controlling financial interest in
substantially all of Aimcos assets in the process of
transfer to us. Except as the context otherwise requires,
we, our and us refer to the
Partnership, and the Partnerships consolidated entities,
collectively. Except as the context otherwise requires,
Aimco refers to Aimco and Aimcos consolidated
entities, collectively.
Our goal is to provide above average returns with lower
volatility. Our business plan to achieve this goal is to:
|
|
|
|
|
own and operate a broadly diversified portfolio of primarily
class B/B+ assets with properties concentrated in
the 20 largest markets in the United States (as measured by
total apartment value, which is the total market value of
institutional-grade apartment properties in a particular market);
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve our portfolio through selling assets with lower
projected returns and reinvesting those proceeds through the
purchase of new assets or redevelopment of assets in our
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
finance our operations using non-recourse, long-dated,
fixed-rate property debt and perpetual preferred equity.
|
As of September 30, 2010, we:
|
|
|
|
|
owned an equity interest in 227 conventional real estate
properties with 70,844 units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned an equity interest in 251 affordable real estate
properties with 29,097 units; and
|
H-6
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
provided services for or managed 27,357 units in 323
properties, primarily pursuant to long-term asset management
agreements. In certain cases, we may indirectly own generally
less than one percent of the operations of such properties
through a syndication or other fund.
|
Of these properties, we consolidated 225 conventional properties
with 69,540 units and 194 affordable properties with
23,468 units. These conventional and affordable properties
generated 84% and 16%, respectively, of consolidated property
net operating income (as defined in Note 7) during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, or 88% and 12%,
respectively, after adjustments for our ownership in these
properties.
At September 30, 2010, after elimination of units held by
consolidated subsidiaries, we had outstanding 122,972,734 common
OP Units, 32,007,462 preferred OP Units and 2,339,950
High Performance Units. At September 30, 2010, Aimco owned
117,033,718 of the common OP Units and 28,940,114 of the
preferred OP Units.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with the
instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
or GAAP, have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such
rules and regulations, although management believes the
disclosures are adequate to prevent the information presented
from being misleading. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009, has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP
for complete financial statements. For further information,
refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain 2009
financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the 2010 presentation, including adjustments for discontinued
operations, and certain 2009 unit and per unit information
has been revised as compared to the amounts reported in our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as
further discussed in Note 6.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we reduced
the investment and noncontrolling interest balances for certain
of our consolidated partnerships by $38.7 million related
to excess amounts allocated to the investments upon our
consolidation of such partnerships. Additionally, during the
three months ended March 31, 2010, we reversed
approximately $11.2 million of excess equity in losses
recognized during 2008 and 2009 related to these partnerships,
with a corresponding adjustment to net income attributed to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships. These adjustments had no significant effect on
partners capital attributed to the Partnership or net
income or loss attributable to the Partnership during the
affected periods.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, certain
of our consolidated tax credit funds reduced by
$9.8 million their December 31, 2009 investment
balances related to unconsolidated low income housing tax credit
partnerships based on changes in the estimated future tax
benefits and residual proceeds. We recognized the equity in
losses in our consolidated financial statements during the three
months ended September 30, 2010. Substantially all of the
equity in losses were attributed to noncontrolling interests in
the consolidated tax credit funds that hold such investments
and, accordingly, had an insignificant effect on net loss
attributable to the Partnership during period.
H-7
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Partnership and its consolidated
entities. Pursuant to a Management and Contribution Agreement
between the Partnership and Aimco, we have acquired, in exchange
for interests in the Partnership, the economic benefits of
subsidiaries of Aimco in which we do not have an interest, and
Aimco has granted us a right of first refusal to acquire such
subsidiaries assets for no additional consideration.
Pursuant to the agreement, Aimco has also granted us certain
rights with respect to assets of such subsidiaries. We
consolidate all variable interest entities for which we are the
primary beneficiary. Generally, we consolidate real estate
partnerships and other entities that are not variable interest
entities when we own, directly or indirectly, a majority voting
interest in the entity or are otherwise able to control the
entity. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Interests in consolidated real estate partnerships held by third
parties are reflected in the accompanying balance sheets as
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships. The assets of consolidated real estate
partnerships owned or controlled by Aimco or us generally are
not available to pay creditors of Aimco or the Partnership.
As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires,
partnership refers to a limited partnership or a
limited liability company and partner refers to a
partner in a limited partnership or a member in a limited
liability company.
Variable
Interest Entities
We consolidate all variable interest entities for which we are
the primary beneficiary. Generally, a variable interest entity,
or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following
characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is
not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a
group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack
(i) the ability to make decisions about an entitys
activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the
obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or
(iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of
the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights
that are not proportional to their economic interests and
substantially all of the entitys activities either
involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has
disproportionately few voting rights.
Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Accounting Standards Update
2009-17,
Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved
with Variable Interest Entities, or ASU
2009-17, on
a prospective basis. ASU
2009-17,
which modified the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 810, introduces a
more qualitative approach to evaluating VIEs for consolidation
and requires a company to perform an analysis to determine
whether its variable interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a VIE. This analysis identifies the primary
beneficiary of a VIE as the entity that has (a) the power
to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly
impact the VIEs economic performance, and (b) the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits
that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In determining
whether it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE
that most significantly affect the VIEs performance, ASU
2009-17
requires a company to assess whether it has an implicit
financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as
designed, requires continuous reassessment of primary
beneficiary status rather than periodic, event-driven
assessments as previously required, and incorporates expanded
disclosure requirements.
In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE,
we consider qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but
not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the
VIEs economic performance and which party controls such
activities; the amount and characteristics of our investment;
the obligation or likelihood for us or other investors to
provide financial support; and the similarity with and
significance to the business activities of us and the other
investors. Significant judgments related to these determinations
include estimates about the current and future fair values and
performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market
conditions.
H-8
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As a result of our adoption of ASU
2009-17, we
concluded we are the primary beneficiary of, and therefore
consolidated, approximately 49 previously unconsolidated
partnerships. Those partnerships own, or control other entities
that own, 31 apartment properties. Our direct and indirect
interests in the profits and losses of those partnerships range
from less than 1% to 35%, and average approximately 7%. We
applied the practicability exception for initial measurement of
consolidated VIEs to partnerships that own 13 properties and
accordingly recognized the consolidated assets, liabilities and
noncontrolling interests at fair value effective January 1,
2010 (refer to the Fair Value Measurements section for further
information regarding certain of the fair value amounts
recognized upon consolidation). We deconsolidated partnerships
that own ten apartment properties in which we hold an average
interest of approximately 55%. The initial consolidation and
deconsolidation of these partnerships resulted in increases
(decreases), net of intercompany eliminations, in amounts
included in our consolidated balance sheet as of January 1,
2010, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Deconsolidation
|
|
|
Real estate, net
|
|
$
|
144,292
|
|
|
$
|
(86,151
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
|
25,047
|
|
|
|
(7,425
|
)
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(13,456
|
)
|
|
|
6,002
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
31,434
|
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,190
|
|
|
|
(1,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
191,507
|
|
|
$
|
(77,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
$
|
131,710
|
|
|
$
|
(56,938
|
)
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
37,504
|
|
|
|
(15,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
169,214
|
|
|
|
(71,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
59,511
|
|
|
|
(8,501
|
)
|
The Partnership
|
|
|
(37,218
|
)
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
22,293
|
|
|
|
(5,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital
|
|
$
|
191,507
|
|
|
$
|
(77,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
reduced by $16.5 million the investments in unconsolidated
real estate partnerships and related noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships balances related to
certain tax credit funds we consolidated in connection with our
adoption of AUS
2009-17.
These revisions related to the tax credit funds reduction
of their December 31, 2009 investment balances related to
unconsolidated low income housing tax credit partnerships based
on changes in the estimated future tax benefits and residual
proceeds. These adjustments had no effect on partners
capital or net income or loss attributable to the Partnership.
In periods prior to 2009, when consolidated real estate
partnerships made cash distributions to partners in excess of
the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest, we generally
recorded a charge to earnings equal to the amount of such excess
distribution, even though there was no economic effect or cost.
Also prior to 2009, we allocated the noncontrolling
partners share of partnership losses to noncontrolling
partners to the extent of the carrying amount of the
noncontrolling interest. Consolidation of a partnership does not
ordinarily result in a change to the net amount of partnership
income or loss that is recognized using the equity method.
However, prior to 2009, when a partnership had a deficit in
equity, GAAP may have required the controlling partner that
consolidates the partnership to recognize any losses that would
otherwise be allocated to noncontrolling partners, in addition
to the controlling partners share of losses. Certain of
the partnerships that we consolidated in accordance with ASU
2009-17 had
deficits in equity that resulted from losses or deficit
distributions during prior periods when we accounted for our
investment using the equity method. We would have been required
to recognize the
H-9
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
noncontrolling partners share of those losses had we
consolidated those partnerships in those periods prior to 2009.
In accordance with our prospective transition method for the
adoption of ASU
2009-17
related to our consolidation of previously unconsolidated
partnerships, we recorded a $37.2 million charge to our
partners capital, the majority of which was attributed to
the cumulative amount of additional losses that we would have
recognized had we applied ASU
2009-17 in
periods prior to 2009. Substantially all of those losses were
attributable to real estate depreciation expense.
Our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, include the following
amounts for the entities and related real estate properties
consolidated as of January 1, 2010, in accordance with ASU
2009-17 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
$
|
8,097
|
|
|
$
|
24,369
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(4,795
|
)
|
|
|
(13,998
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
(7,435
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,299
|
)
|
|
|
(6,723
|
)
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
(4,279
|
)
|
|
|
(8,855
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(6,811
|
)
|
|
|
(11,042
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
6,883
|
|
|
|
11,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Partnership
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our equity in the results of operations of the partnerships and
related properties we deconsolidated in connection with our
adoption of ASU
2009-17 is
included in equity in earnings or losses of unconsolidated real
estate partnerships in our consolidated statements of operations
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Based on our effective ownership in these entities, these
amounts are not significant.
As of September 30, 2010, we were the primary beneficiary
of, and therefore consolidated, approximately 142 VIEs, which
owned 101 apartment properties with 14,652 units. Real
estate with a carrying value of $895.7 million
collateralized $673.9 million of debt of those VIEs. Any
significant amounts of assets and liabilities related to our
consolidated VIEs are identified parenthetically on our
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The
creditors of the consolidated VIEs do not have recourse to our
general credit.
As of September 30, 2010, we also held variable interests
in 284 VIEs for which we were not the primary beneficiary. Those
VIEs consist primarily of partnerships that are engaged,
directly or indirectly, in the ownership and management of 337
apartment properties with 21,215 units. We are involved
with those VIEs as an equity holder, lender, management agent,
or through other contractual relationships. The majority of our
investments in unconsolidated VIEs, or approximately
$61.9 million at September 30, 2010, are held through
consolidated tax credit funds that are VIEs and in which we
generally hold a 1% or less general partner or equivalent
interest. Accordingly, substantially all of the investment
balances related to these unconsolidated VIEs are attributed to
the noncontrolling interests in the consolidated tax credit
funds that hold the investments in these unconsolidated VIEs.
Our maximum risk of loss related to our investment in these VIEs
is generally limited to our equity interest in the consolidated
tax credit funds, which is insignificant. The remainder of our
investment in unconsolidated VIEs, or
H-10
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
approximately $12.2 million at September 30, 2010, is
held through consolidated tax credit funds that are VIEs and in
which we hold substantially all of the economic interests. Our
maximum risk of loss related to our investment in these VIEs is
limited to our $12.2 million recorded investment in such
entities.
In addition to our investments in these unconsolidated VIEs
discussed above, at September 30, 2010, we had in aggregate
$101.4 million of receivables from these VIEs and we had a
contractual obligation to advance funds to certain VIEs totaling
$4.0 million. Our maximum risk of loss associated with our
lending and management activities related to these
unconsolidated VIEs is limited to these amounts. We may be
subject to additional losses to the extent of any receivables
relating to future provision of services to these entities or
financial support that we voluntarily provide.
Partners
Capital (including Noncontrolling Interests)
The following table presents a reconciliation of our
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010 consolidated
partners capital accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Partners Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital
|
|
|
Interests in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
Attributable to the
|
|
|
Consolidated Real
|
|
|
Total Partners
|
|
|
|
Preferred Units
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
Estate Partnerships
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
116,656
|
|
|
$
|
1,233,248
|
|
|
$
|
317,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,550,374
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,422
|
|
|
|
7,422
|
|
Issuance of preferred units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,775
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(5,057
|
)
|
|
|
(65,292
|
)
|
|
|
(37,635
|
)
|
|
|
(102,927
|
)
|
Repurchases of common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,805
|
)
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
Repurchases of preferred units
|
|
|
(11,354
|
)
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Stock based compensation cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,411
|
|
Effect of entities newly consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
|
6,324
|
|
Effect of changes in ownership for consolidated subsidiaries(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,116
|
)
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(1,840
|
)
|
Adjustment of noncontrolling interests related to revision of
investment balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,718
|
)
|
|
|
(38,718
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,130
|
)
|
|
|
51,010
|
|
|
|
16,880
|
|
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,317
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(3,806
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
287
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
(56,267
|
)
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
(58,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
103,537
|
|
|
$
|
1,177,053
|
|
|
$
|
302,068
|
|
|
$
|
1,479,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
acquired a limited partners interest in one of our
consolidated real estate partnerships. We recognized the excess
of the consideration paid over the carrying amount of the
noncontrolling interests as an adjustment of partners
capital. |
H-11
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We primarily use long-term, fixed-rate and
self-amortizing
non-recourse debt to avoid, among other things, risk related to
fluctuating interest rates. For our variable rate debt, we are
sometimes required by our lenders to limit our exposure to
interest rate fluctuations by entering into interest rate swap
or cap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements moderate
our exposure to interest rate risk by effectively converting the
interest on variable rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest
rate cap agreements effectively limit our exposure to interest
rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable
interest rate. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are
reflected as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet, and
periodic changes in fair value are included in interest expense
or partners capital, as appropriate. The interest rate
caps are not material to our financial position or results of
operations.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had
interest rate swaps with aggregate notional amounts of
$52.3 million, and recorded fair values of
$5.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, reflected
in accrued liabilities and other in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets. At September 30, 2010, these interest rate
swaps had a weighted average term of 10.4 years. We have
designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges and
recognize any changes in their fair value as an adjustment of
accumulated other comprehensive income within partners
capital to the extent of their effectiveness. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized
changes in fair value of $3.8 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, of which $3.8 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, resulted in an adjustment to
consolidated partners capital. We recognized less than
$0.1 million and $0.5 million of ineffectiveness as an
adjustment of interest expense during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our consolidated
comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, totaled $30.1 million and
$58.6 million, respectively, and consolidated comprehensive
loss for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, totaled $10.9 million and $48.5 million,
respectively, before the effects of noncontrolling interests. If
the forward rates at September 30, 2010 remain constant, we
estimate that during the next twelve months, we would reclassify
into earnings approximately $1.6 million of the unrealized
losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. If market
interest rates increase above the 3.43% weighted average fixed
rate under these interest rate swaps we will benefit from a
lower effective rate than the underlying variable rates on this
debt.
We have entered into total rate of return swaps on various
fixed-rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed-rate notes
payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a
variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to
lower our cost of borrowing. In exchange for our receipt of a
fixed rate generally equal to the underlying borrowings
interest rate, the total rate of return swaps require that we
pay a variable rate, equivalent to the Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index, or SIFMA,
rate for tax-exempt bonds payable and the
30-day LIBOR
rate for notes payable, plus a risk spread. These swaps
generally have a second or third lien on the property
collateralized by the related borrowings and the obligations
under certain of these swaps are cross-collateralized with
certain of the other swaps with a particular counterparty. The
underlying borrowings are generally callable at our option, with
no prepayment penalty, with 30 days advance notice, and the
swaps generally have a term of less than five years. The total
rate of return swaps have a contractually defined termination
value generally equal to the difference between the fair value
and the counterpartys purchased value of the underlying
borrowings, which may require payment by us or to us for such
difference. Accordingly, we believe fluctuations in the fair
value of the borrowings from the inception of the hedging
relationship generally will be offset by a corresponding
fluctuation in the fair value of the total rate of return swaps.
We designate total rate of return swaps as hedges of the risk of
overall changes in the fair value of the underlying borrowings.
At each reporting period, we estimate the fair value of these
borrowings and the total rate of return swaps and recognize any
changes therein as an adjustment of interest expense.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had
borrowings payable subject to total rate of return swaps with
aggregate outstanding principal balances of $307.2 million
and $352.7 million. At September 30, 2010, the
weighted average fixed receive rate under the total return swaps
was 6.8% and the weighted average variable pay
H-12
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
rate was 0.9%, based on the applicable SIFMA and LIBOR rates
effective as of that date. Information related to the fair value
of these instruments at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, is discussed further below.
Fair
Value Measurements
We measure certain assets and liabilities in our consolidated
financial statements at fair value, both on a recurring and
nonrecurring basis. Certain of these fair value measurements are
based on significant unobservable inputs classified within
Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy defined in FASB ASC
Topic 820. When a determination is made to classify a fair value
measurement within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the
determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable
factors to the overall fair value measurement. However,
Level 3 fair value measurements typically include, in
addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components,
observable components that can be validated to observable
external sources; accordingly, the changes in fair value in the
table below are due in part to observable factors that are part
of the valuation methodology.
The table below presents information regarding significant items
measured in our consolidated financial statements at fair value
on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Total Rate of
|
|
|
Changes in Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps(1)
|
|
|
Return Swaps(2)
|
|
|
Value of Debt(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(2,557
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,495
|
|
|
$
|
(2,557
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings(4)(5)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
(3,395
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in partners capital
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(2,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,100
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,100
|
|
|
$
|
(2,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,307
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,307
|
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings(4)(5)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
|
|
(5,771
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in partners capital
|
|
|
(3,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
(5,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,536
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,536
|
|
|
$
|
(5,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of interest rate swaps is estimated using an
income approach with primarily observable inputs including
information regarding the hedged variable cash flows and forward
yield curves relating to the variable interest rates on which
the hedged cash flows are based. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Total rate of return swaps have contractually-defined
termination values generally equal to the difference between the
fair value and the counterpartys purchased value of the
underlying borrowings. We calculate the termination value, which
we believe is representative of the fair value, of total rate of
return swaps using a market approach by reference to estimates
of the fair value of the underlying borrowings, which are
discussed below, and an evaluation of potential changes in the
credit quality of the counterparties to these arrangements. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
This represents changes in fair value of debt subject to our
total rate of return swaps. We estimate the fair value of debt
instruments using an income and market approach, including
comparison of the contractual terms to observable and
unobservable inputs such as market interest rate risk spreads,
collateral quality and
loan-to-value
ratios on similarly encumbered assets within our portfolio.
These borrowings are collateralized |
H-13
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
and non-recourse to us; therefore, we believe changes in our
credit rating will not materially affect a market
participants estimate of the borrowings fair value. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) relate to periodic revaluations of
fair value and have not resulted from the settlement of a swap
position. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
These amounts are included in interest expense in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
The table below presents information regarding amounts measured
at fair value in our consolidated financial statements on a
nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, all of which were based, in part, on
significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3
of the valuation hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Real estate (impairments losses)(1)
|
|
$
|
43,961
|
|
|
$
|
(8,341
|
)
|
Real estate (newly consolidated)(2)(3)
|
|
|
117,083
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
Property debt (newly consolidated)(2)(4)
|
|
|
83,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we reduced
the aggregate carrying amounts of $52.3 million for real
estate assets classified as held for sale to their estimated
fair value, less estimated costs to sell. These impairment
losses recognized generally resulted from a reduction in the
estimated holding period for these assets. In periods prior to
their classification as held for sale, we evaluated the
recoverability of their carrying amounts based on an analysis of
the undiscounted cash flows over anticipated expected holding
period. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In connection with our adoption of ASU
2009-17 (see
preceding discussion of Variable Interest Entities) and
reconsideration events during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we consolidated 17 partnerships at fair
value. With the exception of such partnerships investments
in real estate properties and related non-recourse property debt
obligations, we determined the carrying amounts of the related
assets and liabilities approximated their fair values. The
difference between our recorded investments in such partnerships
and the fair value of the assets and liabilities recognized in
consolidation, resulted in an adjustment of consolidated
partners capital (allocated between the Partnership and
noncontrolling interests) for those partnerships consolidated in
connection with our adoption of ASU
2009-17. For
the partnerships we consolidated at fair value due to
reconsideration events during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the difference between our recorded
investments in such partnerships and the fair value of the
assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests recognized upon
consolidation resulted in our recognition of a gain, which is
included in gain on disposition of unconsolidated real estate
and other in our consolidated statement of operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
We estimate the fair value of real estate using income and
market valuation techniques using information such as broker
estimates, purchase prices for recent transactions on comparable
assets and net operating income capitalization analyses using
observable and unobservable inputs such as capitalization rates,
asset quality grading, geographic location analysis, and local
supply and demand observations. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Refer to the recurring fair value measurements table for an
explanation of the valuation techniques we use to estimate the
fair value of debt. |
We believe that the aggregate fair value of our cash and cash
equivalents, receivables, payables and short-term secured debt
approximates their aggregate carrying amounts at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, due to their
relatively short-term nature and high probability of
realization. We estimate fair value for our notes receivable and
debt instruments using present value techniques that include
income and market valuation approaches using observable inputs
such as market rates for debt with the same or similar terms and
unobservable inputs such as collateral quality and
loan-to-value
ratios on similarly encumbered assets. Because of the
significance of unobservable inputs to these fair value
measurements, we classify them within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy. Present value calculations vary depending on
the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates
of future cash
H-14
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
flows. In many cases, the fair value estimates may not be
realizable in immediate settlement of the instruments. The
estimated aggregate fair value of our notes receivable was
approximately $128.3 million and $126.1 million at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, as compared to their carrying amounts of
$140.8 million and $139.6 million. The estimated
aggregate fair value of our consolidated debt (including amounts
reported in liabilities related to assets held for sale) was
approximately $6.0 billion and $5.7 billion at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, as compared to aggregate carrying amounts of
$5.5 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively. The fair
values of our derivative instruments at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, are included in the table presented
above.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially could subject us to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
notes receivable and total rate of return swaps. Approximately
$88.4 million of our notes receivable, or 1.2% of our total
assets, at September 30, 2010, are collateralized by 84
buildings with 1,596 residential units in the West Harlem area
of New York City. There are no other significant concentrations
of credit risk with respect to our notes receivable due to the
large number of partnerships that are borrowers under the notes
and the geographic diversification of the properties that serve
as the primary source of repayment of the notes.
At September 30, 2010, we had total rate of return swap
positions with two financial institutions totaling
$307.5 million. We periodically evaluate counterparty
credit risk associated with these arrangements. At the current
time, we have concluded we do not have material exposure. In the
event either counterparty were to default under these
arrangements, loss of the net interest benefit we generally
receive under these arrangements, which is equal to the
difference between the fixed rate we receive and the variable
rate we pay, may adversely impact our results of operations and
operating cash flows. Additionally, the swap agreements with a
specific counterparty provide for collateral calls to maintain
specified
loan-to-value
ratios. As of September 30, 2010, we were not required to
provide cash collateral pursuant to the total rate of return
swaps. In the event the values of the real estate properties
serving as collateral under these agreements decline, we may be
required to provide additional collateral pursuant to the swap
agreements, which may adversely affect our cash flows.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-20,
Disclosures Regarding Credit Quality and the Allowance for
Credit Losses, or ASU
2010-20, to
address concerns regarding the sufficiency of disclosures
regarding credit risk for finance receivables and the related
allowance for credit losses. ASU
2010-20
defines finance receivables and requires disclosure of
disaggregated information regarding receivables by portfolio
segment and class. New disclosures include a detailed
description of and changes to the allowance policy, a
rollforward of the allowance for credit losses, and information
about credit quality indicators we evaluate in assessing
receivables, impaired receivables and past-due or nonaccrual
financing receivables, including the aging of such receivables.
The Partnerships notes receivable and certain other
receivables with contractual maturities in excess of one year
will be subject to the revised disclosure guidance. The new
disclosures will be phased in for our financial statements for
the year ending December 31, 2010 and the quarter ending
March 31, 2011. We have not yet determined the effect ASU
2010-20 will
have on the disclosures included in our annual and quarterly
financial statements.
Income
Taxes
In March 2008, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service,
or the IRS, that it intended to examine our 2006 Federal tax
return. During June 2008, the IRS issued AIMCO-GP, Inc., our
general partner and tax matters partner, a summary report
including the IRSs proposed adjustments to our 2006
Federal tax return. In addition, in May 2009, we were notified
by the IRS that it intended to examine our 2007 Federal tax
return. During November 2009, the IRS issued AIMCO-GP, Inc. a
summary report including the IRSs proposed adjustments to
our 2007 Federal tax return. We do not expect the 2006 or 2007
proposed adjustments to have any material effect on our
unrecognized tax benefits, financial condition or results of
operations.
H-15
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
included in the financial statements and accompanying notes
thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE 3 Real
Estate Dispositions
Real
Estate Dispositions (Discontinued Operations)
We are currently marketing for sale certain real estate
properties that are inconsistent with our long-term investment
strategy. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate
whether such properties meet the criteria to be classified as
held for sale, including whether such properties are expected to
be sold within 12 months. Additionally, certain properties
that do not meet all of the criteria to be classified as held
for sale at the balance sheet date may nevertheless be sold and
included in discontinued operations in the subsequent
12 months; thus, the number of properties that may be sold
during the subsequent 12 months could exceed the number
classified as held for sale. At September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, we had one and 32 properties, with an
aggregate of 164 and 5,212 units, respectively, classified
as held for sale. Amounts classified as held for sale in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Real estate, net
|
|
$
|
4,963
|
|
|
$
|
199,743
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
5,179
|
|
|
$
|
203,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property debt
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
$
|
178,339
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
6,491
|
|
|
$
|
183,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
we sold 31 properties and 57 properties with an aggregate of
5,048 units and 13,405 units, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2009, we sold 89 consolidated
properties with an aggregate of 22,503 units. For the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
discontinued operations includes the results of operations for
the periods prior to the date of sale for all properties sold
and for properties classified as held for sale as of
September 30, 2010.
H-16
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of the components of income from
discontinued operations and the related amounts of income from
discontinued operations attributable to the Partnership and to
noncontrolling interests for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
45,126
|
|
|
$
|
20,654
|
|
|
$
|
170,309
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
(22,619
|
)
|
|
|
(9,255
|
)
|
|
|
(85,233
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(734
|
)
|
|
|
(14,521
|
)
|
|
|
(4,581
|
)
|
|
|
(52,718
|
)
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(26,298
|
)
|
|
|
(9,263
|
)
|
|
|
(40,712
|
)
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(2,266
|
)
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(7,859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
|
|
(20,578
|
)
|
|
|
(2,915
|
)
|
|
|
(16,213
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
(8,751
|
)
|
|
|
(4,137
|
)
|
|
|
(34,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before gain on dispositions of real estate and income tax
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
(29,244
|
)
|
|
|
(6,866
|
)
|
|
|
(50,077
|
)
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
Gain on dispositions of real estate
|
|
|
21,043
|
|
|
|
70,889
|
|
|
|
74,364
|
|
|
|
133,428
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
$
|
19,699
|
|
|
$
|
45,404
|
|
|
$
|
68,532
|
|
|
$
|
86,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
$
|
(5,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,349
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership
|
|
$
|
14,401
|
|
|
$
|
13,055
|
|
|
$
|
46,632
|
|
|
$
|
28,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on dispositions of real estate is reported net of
incremental direct costs incurred in connection with the
transactions, including any prepayment penalties incurred upon
repayment of property loans collateralized by the properties
being sold. Such prepayment penalties totaled $0.6 million
and $3.8 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, and $7.6 million and
$19.4 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. We classify interest
expense related to property debt within discontinued operations
when the related real estate asset is sold or classified as held
for sale.
In connection with properties sold or classified as held for
sale during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, we allocated $0.5 million and $3.3 million,
respectively, of goodwill related to our conventional and
affordable segments to the carrying amounts of the properties
sold or classified as held for sale. Of these amounts,
$0.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, were
treated as a reduction of gain on dispositions of real estate
and $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, were
treated as an adjustment of impairment losses during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010. In connection
with properties sold or classified as held for sale during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
allocated $3.5 million and $6.5 million of goodwill
related to our conventional and affordable segments to the
carrying amounts of the properties sold or classified as held
for sale. The amounts of goodwill allocated to these properties
were based on the relative fair values of the properties sold or
classified as held for sale and the retained portions of the
reporting units to which the goodwill was allocated.
H-17
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gain
on Dispositions of Unconsolidated Real Estate and
Other
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
recognized $0.9 million of gains on the disposition of
interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships and other,
primarily due to our consolidation during 2010 of several
previously unconsolidated real estate partnerships. We
consolidated these partnerships at fair value upon our removal
of the previous general partner and at the time of consolidation
we recognized a gain equal to the difference between the fair
value of the net assets and liabilities consolidated and the
carrying amount of our investment in these entities.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we
recognized $5.4 million of gains on the disposition of
interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships and other.
These gains were primarily related to sales of investments held
by partnerships we consolidated in accordance with our adoption
of ASU
2009-17 (see
Note 2) and in which we generally hold a nominal
general partner interest. Accordingly, these gains were
primarily attributed to noncontrolling interests in consolidated
real estate partnerships.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we
recognized $2.8 million of gains on the disposition of
unconsolidated real estate and other, which consisted of a
$3.9 million gain from the disposition of our interest in a
group purchasing organization, partially offset by losses
related to unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
recognized $18.2 million of gains on the disposition of
unconsolidated real estate and other. These gains consisted of
$8.6 million resulting from our receipt in 2009 of
additional proceeds related to our disposition during 2008 of an
interest in an unconsolidated real estate partnership, a
$3.9 million gain from the disposition of our interest in a
group purchasing organization and approximately
$5.7 million of gains related to dispositions of interests
in unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
|
|
NOTE 4
|
Other
Significant Transactions
|
Restructuring
Costs
During 2009, in connection with the repositioning of our
portfolio, we completed organizational restructuring activities
that included reductions in workforce and related costs and the
abandonment of additional leased corporate facilities and
redevelopment projects. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we reduced our restructuring accruals
by $1.7 million and $4.7 million related to payments
on unrecoverable lease obligations and severance and personnel
related costs, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, the
remaining accruals associated with our restructuring activity
are $5.2 million for estimated unrecoverable lease
obligations, which will be paid over the remaining terms of the
affected leases.
Preferred
Unit Transactions
On September 7, 2010, Aimco issued 4,000,000 shares of
its 7.75% Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value
$.01 per share, or the Class U Preferred Stock, in an
underwritten public offering for a price per share of $24.09
(reflecting a price to the public of $24.86 per share, less an
underwriting discount and commissions of $0.77 per share). The
offering generated net proceeds of $96.1 million (after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
transaction expenses). Aimco contributed the net proceeds to us
in exchange for 4,000,000 units of our 7.75% Class U
Cumulative Preferred Units. We recorded issuance costs of
$3.3 million, consisting primarily of underwriting
commissions, as an adjustment of partners capital
attributable to the Partnership within our condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
On October 7, 2010, using the net proceeds from the
issuance of Class U Preferred Stock supplemented by
corporate funds, Aimco redeemed all of the 4,050,000 outstanding
shares of its 9.375% Class G Cumulative Preferred Stock,
inclusive of 10,000 shares held by a consolidated
subsidiary that are eliminated in consolidation. This redemption
was for cash at a price equal to $25.00 per share, or
$101.3 million in aggregate, plus accumulated and unpaid
dividends of $2.2 million. Concurrent with this redemption,
we redeemed all of our outstanding Class G
H-18
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cumulative Preferred Units, 4,040,000 of which were held by
Aimco and 10,000 of which were held by a consolidated
subsidiary. In connection with the redemption, $4.3 million
of issuance costs previously recorded as a reduction of
partners capital attributable to the Partnership will be
reflected as an increase in net income attributable to preferred
unitholders for purposes of calculating earnings per unit for
the three months and year ending December 31, 2010.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
In connection with our redevelopment activities, we have
commitments of approximately $0.3 million related to
construction projects that are expected to be completed during
2010. Additionally, we enter into certain commitments for future
purchases of goods and services in connection with the
operations of our properties. Those commitments generally have
terms of one year or less and reflect expenditure levels
comparable to our historical expenditures.
We have committed to fund an additional $4.0 million in
loans on certain properties in West Harlem in New York City. In
certain circumstances, the obligor under these notes has the
ability to put properties to us, which would result in a cash
payment between $30.6 million and $97.7 million and
the assumption of $118.6 million in property debt. The
ability to exercise the put and the amount of cash payment
required upon exercise is dependent upon the achievement of
specified thresholds by the current owner of the properties.
In June 2009, Aimco entered into an agreement that allows the
holder of some of its Series A Community Reinvestment Act
Preferred Stock, or CRA Preferred Stock, to require Aimco to
repurchase a portion of the CRA Preferred Stock at a 30%
discount to the liquidation preference. In accordance with this
repurchase agreement, in May 2010, Aimco repurchased
20 shares, or $10.0 million in liquidation preference,
of CRA Preferred Stock for $7.0 million. Concurrent with
this redemption, we repurchased from Aimco an equivalent number
of our Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual
Preferred Units, or CRA Preferred Units. We reflected the
$3.0 million excess of the carrying value over the
repurchase price, offset by $0.2 million of issuance costs
previously recorded as a reduction of partners capital, as
a reduction of net income attributable to preferred unitholders
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
As of September 30, 2010, Aimco had a remaining potential
obligation under this agreement to repurchase up to
$20.0 million in liquidation preference of its CRA
Preferred Stock. If required, these additional repurchases will
be for up to $10.0 million in liquidation preference in May
2011 and 2012. Upon any repurchases required of Aimco under this
agreement, we will repurchase from Aimco an equivalent number of
our CRA Preferred Units. Based on the holders ability to
require Aimco to repurchase these amounts and our obligation to
purchase from Aimco a corresponding number of our CRA Preferred
Units, the $20.0 million in liquidation preference of CRA
Preferred Units, or the maximum redemption value of such
preferred units, is classified within temporary capital in our
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010.
Tax
Credit Arrangements
We are required to manage certain consolidated real estate
partnerships in compliance with various laws, regulations and
contractual provisions that apply to our historic and low-income
housing tax credit syndication arrangements. In some instances,
noncompliance with applicable requirements could result in
projected tax benefits not being realized and require a refund
or reduction of investor capital contributions, which are
reported as deferred income in our consolidated balance sheet,
until such time as our obligation to deliver tax benefits is
relieved. The remaining compliance periods for our tax credit
syndication arrangements range from less than one year to
15 years. We do not anticipate that any material refunds or
reductions of investor capital contributions will be required in
connection with these arrangements.
H-19
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Legal
Matters
In addition to the matters described below, we are a party to
various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of business, some of which are covered by
our general liability insurance program, and none of which we
expect to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Limited
Partnerships
In connection with our acquisitions of interests in real estate
partnerships, we are sometimes subject to legal actions,
including allegations that such activities may involve breaches
of fiduciary duties to the partners of such real estate
partnerships or violations of the relevant partnership
agreements. We may incur costs in connection with the defense or
settlement of such litigation. We believe that we comply with
our fiduciary obligations and relevant partnership agreements.
Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, we do not
expect any such legal actions to have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or
operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal
or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a
property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew
of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the
hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage
or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to
sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs
associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by
government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by
such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous
substances on a property could result in claims by private
plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other
infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of
removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through
a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges
for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is
potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose
liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal
ever owned or operated the facility. In connection with the
ownership, operation and management of properties, we could
potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs
associated with our properties or properties we acquire or
manage in the future.
We have determined that our legal obligations to remove or
remediate hazardous substances may be conditional asset
retirement obligations, as defined in GAAP. Except in limited
circumstances where the asset retirement activities are expected
to be performed in connection with a planned construction
project or property casualty, we believe that the fair value of
our asset retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated
due to significant uncertainties in the timing and manner of
settlement of those obligations. Asset retirement obligations
that are reasonably estimable as of September 30, 2010, are
immaterial to our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
Earnings
(Loss) per Unit
|
We calculate earnings (loss) per unit based on the weighted
average number of common OP Units, participating
securities, common OP unit equivalents and dilutive convertible
securities outstanding during the period. We consider both
common OP Units and High Performance Units, which have
identical rights to distributions and undistributed earnings, to
be common units for purposes of the earnings (loss) per unit
data presented below. The
H-20
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
following table illustrates the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per unit for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except per unit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(47,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,754
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,302
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135,431
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
16,511
|
|
|
|
13,095
|
|
|
|
23,695
|
|
|
|
33,412
|
|
Income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders
|
|
|
(13,492
|
)
|
|
|
(14,731
|
)
|
|
|
(39,918
|
)
|
|
|
(42,189
|
)
|
Income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(44,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
(139,525
|
)
|
|
$
|
(144,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
19,699
|
|
|
$
|
45,404
|
|
|
$
|
68,532
|
|
|
$
|
86,289
|
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(5,298
|
)
|
|
|
(32,349
|
)
|
|
|
(21,900
|
)
|
|
|
(58,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
14,401
|
|
|
$
|
13,055
|
|
|
$
|
46,632
|
|
|
$
|
28,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(28,266
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,350
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,770
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,142
|
)
|
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
11,213
|
|
|
|
(19,254
|
)
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
(24,665
|
)
|
Income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders
|
|
|
(13,492
|
)
|
|
|
(14,731
|
)
|
|
|
(39,918
|
)
|
|
|
(42,189
|
)
|
Income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(30,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,335
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92,893
|
)
|
|
$
|
(115,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per unit weighted
average number of common units outstanding
|
|
|
124,739
|
|
|
|
124,376
|
|
|
|
124,601
|
|
|
|
122,790
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit
|
|
|
124,739
|
|
|
|
124,376
|
|
|
|
124,601
|
|
|
|
122,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, the common unit
equivalents that could potentially dilute basic earnings per
unit in future periods totaled 7.2 million and
9.9 million, respectively. These securities, representing
options to
H-21
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purchase shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock, have been
excluded from the earnings (loss) per unit computations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Participating securities, consisting of unvested restricted
shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock and shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock purchased pursuant to officer loans,
receive dividends similar to shares of Aimco Class A Common
Stock and common OP Units and totaled 0.6 million and
0.9 million at September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The effect of participating securities is
reflected in basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit
computations for the periods presented above using the two-class
method of allocating distributed and undistributed earnings.
Various classes of redeemable preferred OP Units are
outstanding. Depending on the terms of each class, these
preferred OP Units are convertible into common
OP Units or redeemable for cash or, at our option, shares
of Aimco Class A Common Stock, and are paid distributions
varying from 1.84% to 9.5% per annum per unit, or equal to the
dividends paid on Aimco Class A Common Stock based on the
conversion terms. As of September 30, 2010, a total of
3.1 million preferred OP Units were outstanding with
redemption values of $82.7 million and were potentially
redeemable for approximately 3.9 million shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock (based on the period end market
price), or cash at our option. We have a redemption policy that
requires cash settlement of redemption requests for the
preferred OP Units, subject to limited exceptions. The
potential dilutive effect of these securities would have been
antidilutive in the periods presented; however, based on our
cash redemption policy, they may also be excluded from future
earnings (loss) per unit computations in periods during which
their effect is dilutive.
In December 2009, we adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting
Standards Update
2010-01,
Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components
of Stock and Cash, or ASU
2010-01,
which are codified in FASB ASC Topic 505. ASU
2010-01
requires that for distributions with components of cash and
stock, the portion distributed in stock should be accounted for
prospectively as a stock issuance with no retroactive adjustment
to basic and diluted earnings per share. In accordance with ASU
2010-01, we
retrospectively revised the accounting treatment of our special
distribution paid in January 2009, resulting in a
1.6 million reduction in the number of weighted average
units outstanding and a $0.01 increase in the loss per unit
attributed to the Partnerships common unitholders for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the
amounts reported in our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
NOTE 7
|
Business
Segments
|
Based on a planned reduction in our transactional activities,
during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we
reevaluated our reportable segments and determined our
investment management reporting unit no longer meets the
requirements for a reportable segment. Additionally, to provide
more meaningful information regarding our real estate
operations, we elected to disaggregate information for the prior
real estate segment. Following these changes, we have two
reportable segments: conventional real estate operations and
affordable real estate operations. Our conventional real estate
operations consist of market-rate apartments with rents paid by
the resident and include 227 properties with 70,844 units.
Our affordable real estate operations consist of 251 properties
with 29,097 units, with rents that are generally paid, in
whole or part, by a government agency.
Our chief operating decision maker uses various generally
accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance
of the business, including: property net operating income, which
is rental and other property revenues less direct property
operating expenses, including real estate taxes; Net Asset
Value, which is the estimated fair value of our assets, net of
debt; Pro forma Funds From Operations, which is Funds From
Operations excluding operating real estate impairment losses and
preferred unit redemption related gains or losses; Adjusted
Funds From Operations, which is Pro forma Funds From Operations
less spending for Capital Replacements; same store property
operating results; Free Cash Flow, which is net operating income
less spending for Capital Replacements; Free Cash Flow internal
rate of return; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown
on our balance sheet. The chief operating decision maker
emphasizes net operating income as a key measurement of segment
profit or loss. Segment net operating income is generally
defined as segment revenues less direct segment operating
expenses.
H-22
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following tables present the revenues, net operating income
(loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations of our
conventional and affordable real estate operations segments for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
Amounts Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Allocated to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations(1)
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(2)
|
|
$
|
228,327
|
|
|
$
|
53,612
|
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
282,595
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,707
|
|
|
|
9,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
228,327
|
|
|
|
53,612
|
|
|
|
10,363
|
|
|
|
292,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
88,782
|
|
|
|
25,479
|
|
|
|
13,913
|
|
|
|
128,174
|
|
Asset management and tax credit expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,309
|
|
|
|
107,309
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,096
|
|
|
|
12,096
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
88,782
|
|
|
|
25,479
|
|
|
|
140,608
|
|
|
|
254,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
139,545
|
|
|
|
28,133
|
|
|
|
(130,245
|
)
|
|
|
37,433
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,398
|
)
|
|
|
(85,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
139,545
|
|
|
$
|
28,133
|
|
|
$
|
(215,643
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(2)
|
|
$
|
227,917
|
|
|
$
|
46,040
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
275,072
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
10,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
227,917
|
|
|
|
46,040
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
285,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
92,969
|
|
|
|
23,112
|
|
|
|
17,143
|
|
|
|
133,224
|
|
Asset management and tax credit expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,290
|
|
|
|
110,290
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,772
|
|
|
|
12,772
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
92,969
|
|
|
|
23,112
|
|
|
|
152,121
|
|
|
|
268,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
134,948
|
|
|
|
22,928
|
|
|
|
(140,681
|
)
|
|
|
17,195
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,949
|
)
|
|
|
(71,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
134,948
|
|
|
$
|
22,928
|
|
|
$
|
(212,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H-23
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
Amounts Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Allocated to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations(1)
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(2)
|
|
$
|
683,257
|
|
|
$
|
159,668
|
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
845,620
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,560
|
|
|
|
23,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
683,257
|
|
|
|
159,668
|
|
|
|
26,255
|
|
|
|
869,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
272,135
|
|
|
|
78,649
|
|
|
|
45,080
|
|
|
|
395,864
|
|
Asset management and tax credit expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,393
|
|
|
|
322,393
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,015
|
|
|
|
39,015
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
272,135
|
|
|
|
78,649
|
|
|
|
419,851
|
|
|
|
770,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
411,122
|
|
|
|
81,019
|
|
|
|
(393,596
|
)
|
|
|
98,545
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(221,847
|
)
|
|
|
(221,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
411,122
|
|
|
$
|
81,019
|
|
|
$
|
(615,443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(2)
|
|
$
|
682,488
|
|
|
$
|
140,793
|
|
|
$
|
4,098
|
|
|
$
|
827,379
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,469
|
|
|
|
32,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
682,488
|
|
|
|
140,793
|
|
|
|
36,567
|
|
|
|
859,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
273,841
|
|
|
|
68,676
|
|
|
|
48,504
|
|
|
|
391,021
|
|
Asset management and tax credit expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,661
|
|
|
|
321,661
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,612
|
|
|
|
43,612
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,453
|
|
|
|
12,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
273,841
|
|
|
|
68,676
|
|
|
|
440,584
|
|
|
|
783,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
408,647
|
|
|
|
72,117
|
|
|
|
(404,017
|
)
|
|
|
76,747
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212,178
|
)
|
|
|
(212,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
408,647
|
|
|
$
|
72,117
|
|
|
$
|
(616,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135,431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net operating income amounts from our affordable real estate
operations for 2010 are not comparable to the 2009 amounts due
to our adoption during 2010 of revised accounting guidance
regarding consolidation of variable interest entities (see
Note 2). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Our chief operating decision maker assesses the performance of
our conventional and affordable real estate operations using,
among other measures, net operating income, excluding property
management revenues and certain property management expenses,
casualty gains and losses, depreciation and amortization and
provision for operating real estate impairment losses.
Accordingly, we do not allocate these amounts to our segments. |
H-24
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets of our reportable segments are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
$
|
5,898,194
|
|
|
$
|
6,032,988
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
1,188,134
|
|
|
|
1,130,089
|
|
Corporate and other assets
|
|
|
547,057
|
|
|
|
759,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
7,633,385
|
|
|
$
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H-25
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Forward
Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides
a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in
certain circumstances. Certain information included in this
Report contains or may contain information that is
forward-looking, within the meaning of the federal securities
laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding our
ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy, rental
rates and property operating results. Actual results may differ
materially from those described in these forward-looking
statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of
risks and factors, some of which are beyond our control,
including, without limitation: financing risks, including the
availability and cost of capital markets financing and the risk
that our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet
required payments of principal and interest; earnings may not be
sufficient to maintain compliance with debt covenants; real
estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and
the general economic climate in the markets in which we operate
and competition for residents in such markets; national and
local economic conditions, including the pace of job growth and
the level of unemployment; the terms of governmental regulations
that affect us and interpretations of those regulations; the
competitive environment in which we operate; the timing of
acquisitions and dispositions; insurance risk, including the
cost of insurance; natural disasters and severe weather such as
hurricanes; litigation, including costs associated with
prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; energy
costs; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs,
fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary
remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or
previously owned by us. In addition, Aimcos current and
continuing qualification as a real estate investment trust
involves the application of highly technical and complex
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and depends on its
ability to meet the various requirements imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code, through actual operating results, distribution
levels and diversity of stock ownership. Readers should
carefully review our financial statements and the notes thereto,
as well as the section entitled Risk Factors
described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the other
documents we file from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. As used herein and except as the context
otherwise requires, we, our,
us and the Company refer to AIMCO
Properties, L.P. (which we refer to as the Partnership) and the
Partnerships consolidated corporate subsidiaries and
consolidated real estate partnerships, collectively.
Executive
Overview
We are the operating partnership for Aimco, which is a
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust,
or REIT. Our goal is to provide above average returns with lower
volatility. Our business plan to achieve this goal is to:
|
|
|
|
|
own and operate a broadly diversified portfolio of primarily
class B/B+ assets with properties concentrated in
the 20 largest markets in the United States (as measured by
total apartment value, which is the total market value of
institutional-grade apartment properties in a particular market);
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve our portfolio through selling assets with lower
projected returns and reinvesting those proceeds through the
purchase of new assets or redevelopment of assets in our
portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
finance our operations using non-recourse, long-dated, fixed
rate property debt and perpetual preferred equity.
|
Our owned real estate portfolio includes 227 conventional
properties with 70,844 units and 251 affordable properties
with 29,097 units. Our conventional and affordable
portfolios comprise 88% and 12% of our total property net asset
value. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, our
conventional portfolio monthly rents averaged $1,044 and
provided 62% operating margins. These average rents increased
from $1,042 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, which
were approximately 101% of local market averages (based on
June 30, 2010 market data, the most recent period for which
third party data is available). Our diversified portfolio
resulted in improved property operating results from 2008 to
2010. After adjustments for discontinued operations, the
increase
H-26
or decrease in net operating income of our total real estate
operations, total same store portfolio and conventional same
store portfolio during 2008, 2009 and
year-to-date
September 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Total Same
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
Store
|
|
Same Store
|
|
2008 as compared to 2007
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
2009 as compared to 2008
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to nine
months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to three
months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
We continue to work toward simplifying our business, including a
de-emphasis on transactional based activity fees and a
corresponding reduction in personnel involved in those
activities. Income from transactional activities has decreased
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to 2009, and our offsite costs have been reduced by
$13.1 million. Our 2009 and 2010 results are discussed in
the Results of Operations section below.
We upgrade the quality of our portfolio through the sale of
communities with rents below average market rents. We prefer the
redevelopment of select properties in our existing portfolio to
ground-up
development, as we believe it provides superior risk adjusted
returns with lower volatility.
Our leverage strategy focuses on minimizing risk. At
September 30, 2010, approximately 85% of our leverage
consisted of property-level, non-recourse, long-dated,
fixed-rate, amortizing debt, 15% consisted of perpetual
preferred equity, which limits our refunding and re-pricing
risk, and we had no outstanding corporate level debt. Our
leverage strategy limits refunding risk on our property-level
debt, with 2% of our debt maturing in 2011, less than 10%
maturing in each of 2012 and 2013, and less than 8% maturing in
each of 2014 and 2015, and provides a hedge against increases in
interest rates and inflation, with approximately 90% of our
property-level debt being fixed-rate. During September 2010, we
expanded our credit facility from $180.0 million to
$300.0 million, providing additional liquidity for
short-term or unexpected cash requirements.
The key financial indicators that we use in managing our
business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating
performance are: property net operating income, which is rental
and other property revenues less direct property operating
expenses, including real estate taxes; Net Asset Value, which is
the estimated fair value of our assets, net of debt; Pro forma
Funds From Operations, which is Funds From Operations excluding
operating real estate impairment losses and preferred unit
redemption related gains or losses; Adjusted Funds From
Operations, which is Pro forma Funds From Operations less
spending for Capital Replacements; same store property operating
results; Free Cash Flow, which is net operating income less
spending for Capital Replacements; Free Cash Flow internal rate
of return; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as shown on
our balance sheet. Funds From Operations represents net income
or loss, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains from
sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and
amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. Capital Replacements represent
capital additions that are deemed to replace the consumed
portion of acquired capital assets. The key macro-economic
factors and non-financial indicators that affect our financial
condition and operating performance are: household formations;
rates of job growth; single-family and multifamily housing
starts; interest rates; and availability and cost of financing.
Because our operating results depend primarily on income from
our properties, the supply and demand for apartments influences
our operating results. Additionally, the level of expenses
required to operate and maintain our properties and the pace and
price at which we redevelop, acquire and dispose of our
apartment properties affect our operating results. Our cost of
capital is affected by the conditions in the capital and credit
markets and the terms that we negotiate for our equity and debt
financings.
Highlights of our results of operations for the three months
ended September 30, 2010, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily occupancy for our Conventional Same Store
properties remained high at 96.0%.
|
H-27
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Same Store revenues and expenses for the three
months ended September 30, 2010, decreased by 0.1% and
4.2%, respectively, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009, resulting in a 2.6% increase in net
operating income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Same Store net operating income for the three
months ended September 30, 2010, increased by 1.0% as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income related to our asset management, tax credit and
investment management activities have increased slightly
relative to 2009, primarily due to reductions in personnel and
related costs based on a reduced emphasis on this part of our
business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property sales declined relative to 2009. We expect
property sales to continue to decline in the remainder of 2010,
as property sales completed through July allowed us to fully
repay the remainder of our term debt.
|
The following discussion and analysis of the results of our
operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction
with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements in Item 1.
Results
of Operations
Overview
Three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
September 30, 2009
We reported net loss attributable to the Partnership of
$17.1 million and net loss attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders of $30.5 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to net
loss attributable to the Partnership of $28.6 million and
net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders of $43.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, decreases in losses of
$11.5 million and $12.8 million, respectively.
These decreases in net loss were principally due to the
following items, all of which are discussed in further detail
below:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income of our properties included
in continuing operations, reflecting improved
operations; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in earnings allocated to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships, primarily due to their
share of the decrease in gains on disposition of consolidated
real estate properties discussed below.
|
The effects of these items on our operating results were
partially offset by a decrease in income from discontinued
operations, primarily related to a decrease in gains on
dispositions of real estate due to a decrease in property sales
in 2010 as compared to 2009.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we reported
net loss attributable to the Partnership of $53.0 million
and net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders of $92.9 million, compared to net loss
attributable to the Partnership of $73.8 million and net
loss attributable to the Partnerships common unitholders
of $116.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, decreases of $20.8 million and
$23.1 million, respectively.
These decreases in net loss were principally due to the
following items, all of which are discussed in further detail
below:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income of our properties included
in continuing operations, reflecting improved operations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in earnings allocated to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships, primarily due to their
share of the decrease in gains on disposition of consolidated
real estate properties as discussed below; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in other expenses, primarily attributable to the
settlement of certain litigation matters in 2010.
|
H-28
The effects of these items on our operating results were
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in income from discontinued operations, primarily
related to a decrease in gains on dispositions of real estate
due to a decrease in property sales in 2010 as compared to
2009; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate
and other, primarily attributable to additional proceeds
received in 2009 related to our disposition during 2008 of an
interest in an unconsolidated real estate partnership.
|
The following paragraphs discuss these and other items affecting
the results of our operations in more detail.
Real
Estate Operations
Our real estate portfolio is comprised of two business
components: conventional real estate operations and affordable
real estate operations, which also represent our two reportable
segments. Our conventional real estate portfolio consists of
market-rate apartments with rents paid by the resident and
includes 227 properties with 70,844 units. Our affordable
real estate portfolio consists of 251 properties with
29,097 units, with rents that are generally paid, in whole
or part, by a government agency. Our conventional and affordable
properties contributed 88% and 12%, respectively, of our
ownership adjusted property net operating income amounts during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes the net operating income of our
real estate operations, including our conventional and
affordable segments, for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional real estate operations
|
|
$
|
228,327
|
|
|
$
|
227,917
|
|
|
$
|
683,257
|
|
|
$
|
682,488
|
|
Affordable real estate operations
|
|
|
53,612
|
|
|
|
46,040
|
|
|
|
159,668
|
|
|
|
140,793
|
|
Corporate and amounts not allocated
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
4,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
282,595
|
|
|
|
275,072
|
|
|
|
845,620
|
|
|
|
827,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional real estate operations
|
|
|
88,782
|
|
|
|
92,969
|
|
|
|
272,135
|
|
|
|
273,841
|
|
Affordable real estate operations
|
|
|
25,479
|
|
|
|
23,112
|
|
|
|
78,649
|
|
|
|
68,676
|
|
Corporate and amounts not allocated
|
|
|
13,913
|
|
|
|
17,143
|
|
|
|
45,080
|
|
|
|
48,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
128,174
|
|
|
|
133,224
|
|
|
|
395,864
|
|
|
|
391,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operations net operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional real estate operations
|
|
|
139,545
|
|
|
|
134,948
|
|
|
|
411,122
|
|
|
|
408,647
|
|
Affordable real estate operations
|
|
|
28,133
|
|
|
|
22,928
|
|
|
|
81,019
|
|
|
|
72,117
|
|
Corporate and amounts not allocated
|
|
|
(13,257
|
)
|
|
|
(16,028
|
)
|
|
|
(42,385
|
)
|
|
|
(44,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
154,421
|
|
|
$
|
141,848
|
|
|
$
|
449,756
|
|
|
$
|
436,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, our real estate
operations net operating income increased by $12.6 million,
or 8.9%, and consisted of an increase in rental and other
property revenues of $7.5 million, or 2.7%, and a decrease
in property operating expenses of $5.1 million, or 3.8%.
Our conventional segment consists of conventional properties we
classify as same store, redevelopment and other conventional
properties. Same store properties are properties we manage and
that have reached and maintained a stabilized level of occupancy
during the current and prior year comparable period.
Redevelopment properties are those in which a substantial number
of available units have been vacated for major renovations or
H-29
have not been stabilized in occupancy for at least one year as
of the earliest period presented, or for which other significant
non-unit
renovations are underway or have been complete for less than one
year. Other conventional properties may include conventional
properties that have significant rent control restrictions,
acquisition properties, university housing properties and
properties that are not multifamily, such as commercial
properties or fitness centers. Our conventional segments
net operating income increased $4.6 million, or 3.4%,
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to 2009.
Conventional same store net operating income increased by
$3.2 million, primarily due to a reduction in previously
estimated real estate tax obligations resulting from successful
appeals settled during the period, and decreases in marketing
expenses. This overall decrease in expenses was partially offset
by a decrease in our conventional same store revenues of
$0.2 million, resulting from lower average rent
(approximately $26 per unit), partially offset by an increase of
120 basis points in average physical occupancy and higher
utility reimbursement and miscellaneous income. Rental rates on
new leases transacted during the three months ended
September 30, 2010, were 1.4% lower than expiring lease
rates, while renewal rates were 1.5% higher than expiring lease
rates.
The net operating income of our conventional redevelopment
properties increased by $1.0 million, due to a
$0.8 million increase in revenues resulting from a 6%
increase in the number of units in service at these properties
relative to 2009 and a $0.2 million decrease in expenses.
The net operating income of our conventional other properties
increased by $0.4 million, primarily due to decreases in
real estate taxes.
The net operating income of our affordable segment, which
includes same store and redevelopment properties, increased
$5.2 million, or 22.7%, during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 2009. Revenues and
expenses of our affordable properties increased by
$7.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively, primarily
due to properties we consolidated based on our adoption of
revised accounting guidance regarding consolidation of variable
interest entities (see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements in Item 1). Our other affordable
properties revenues increased by $1.5 million, due to
increases in average rent and occupancy. For the three months
ended September 30, 2010, average month-end occupancy for
our affordable properties was 97.4%, an increase of
60 basis points as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009, while average rent per unit increased
2.7% from $773 to $794 per unit.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our real estate
operations net operating income increased by $13.4 million,
or 3.1%, and consisted of an increase in rental and other
property revenues of $18.2 million, or 2.2%, and an
offsetting increase in property operating expenses of
$4.8 million, or 1.2%.
Our conventional segment net operating income increased
$2.5 million, or 0.6%, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 2009.
Our conventional same store net operating income decreased
$1.3 million. This decrease was attributed to a
$3.0 million decrease in revenue, primarily due to lower
average rent (approximately $43 per unit), partially offset by
an increase of 230 basis points in average physical
occupancy and higher utility reimbursement and miscellaneous
income. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by a
$1.7 million decrease in expense, primarily due to a
reduction in previously estimated real estate tax obligations
resulting from successful appeals settled during the period, and
decreases in marketing expenses.
Conventional redevelopment net operating income increased by
$5.1 million, due to a $4.4 million increase in
revenues resulting from a 13% increase in the number of units in
service at these properties relative to 2009, and a
$0.7 million decrease in expense, primarily due to a
reductions in marketing expenses as the occupancy at these
properties increased.
Our conventional other net operating income decreased by
$1.3 million primarily due to decreases in revenues, a
result of fewer units in service at certain properties that
incurred casualty losses, and increases in expenses.
Our affordable segment net operating income increased
$8.9 million, or 12.3%, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 2009. Revenues and
expenses of our affordable properties increased by
$18.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively,
$15.5 million and $9.3 million of which was due to
properties we
H-30
consolidated based on our adoption of revised accounting
guidance regarding consolidation of variable interest entities
(see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements in Item 1). Revenues of our other affordable
properties increased by $3.4 million, primarily due to a
$21 per unit increase in average rent.
Real estate operations net operating income amounts not
attributed to our conventional or affordable segments include
property management revenues and expenses and casualty losses,
which we do not allocate to our conventional or affordable
segments for purposes of evaluating segment performance. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared
to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
property management revenues decreased by $0.5 million and
$1.4 million, respectively, primarily due to the
elimination of revenues related to properties consolidated
during 2010 in connection with our adoption of revised
accounting guidance regarding consolidation of variable interest
entities discussed above. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, as compared to the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, expenses not allocated to
our conventional or affordable segments decreased by
$3.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Casualty
losses decreased by $1.7 million during the three months
ended September 30, 2010, as compared to 2009, whereas
casualty losses increased by $0.8 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to 2009.
Property management expenses decreased by $1.5 million and
$4.3 million, respectively, during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to 2009,
primarily due to reductions in personnel and related costs
attributed to our restructuring activities (see Note 4 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
Asset
Management and Tax Credit Revenues
We perform activities and services for consolidated and
unconsolidated real estate partnerships, including portfolio
strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit
syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction
activities. These activities are conducted in part by our
taxable subsidiaries, and the related net operating income may
be subject to income taxes.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, asset management
and tax credit revenues decreased $0.6 million. This
decrease is attributable to a $1.8 million decrease in
disposition and other fees we earn in connection with
transactional activities, a $0.7 million decrease in income
related to our affordable housing tax credit syndication
business, which primarily relates to a reduction in amortization
of deferred tax credit income, and a $0.5 million decrease
in current asset management fees, partially offset by a
$2.4 million increase in promote income, which is income
earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by
our consolidated joint ventures.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, asset management
and tax credit revenues decreased $8.9 million. This
decrease is attributable to a $5.3 million decrease in
income related to our affordable housing tax credit syndication
business, which includes a $2.5 million write off of
syndication fees receivable we determined were uncollectible
during 2010 and a $2.8 million decrease in amortization of
related tax credit income, primarily related to adjustments in
the amount and timing of anticipated cash flows for several tax
credit projects. The decrease in revenues also includes a
$3.2 million decrease in disposition and other fees we earn
in connection with transactional activities and a
$1.6 million decrease in current asset management fees,
primarily due to the elimination of fees associated with certain
partnerships we consolidated during 2010 (see Note 2 to our
condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1
discussing our adoption of revised accounting guidance regarding
the consolidation of variable interest entities), partially
offset by a $1.2 million increase in promote income, which
is income earned in connection with the disposition of
properties owned by our consolidated joint ventures.
Investment
Management Expenses
Investment management expenses consist primarily of the costs of
personnel that perform asset management and tax credit
activities. For the three months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009,
investment management expenses decreased $1.6 million. This
decrease is primarily due to a $1.3 million reduction in
personnel and related costs from our organizational
restructurings.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, investment
management expenses decreased $1.7 million. This decrease
is primarily due to a $4.0 million reduction
H-31
in personnel and related costs from our organizational
restructurings, offset by a $2.3 million increase in
expenses, primarily related to our write off of previously
deferred costs related to tax credit projects we recently
abandoned.
Depreciation
and Amortization
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, depreciation and
amortization decreased $3.0 million, or 2.7%. This decrease
was primarily due to depreciation adjustments recognized in 2009
to reduce the carrying amount of certain properties. This
decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation
related to properties we consolidated during 2010 based on our
adoption of revised accounting guidance regarding consolidation
of variable interest entities (see Note 2 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements in Item 1).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, depreciation and
amortization increased $0.7 million, or 0.2%. This increase
was primarily related to completed redevelopments and other
capital projects recently placed in service and properties we
consolidated during 2010 as discussed above. These increases
were partially offset by depreciation adjustments recognized in
2009 to reduce the carrying amount of certain properties.
General
and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, general and
administrative expenses decreased $0.7 million, or 5.3%,
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2009, general and
administrative expenses decreased $4.6 million, or 10.5%.
These decreases are primarily attributable to net reductions in
personnel and related expenses, partially offset by an increase
in information technology outsourcing costs.
In connection with our organizational restructuring activities
discussed in Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements in Item 1, we have reduced our total offsite
costs, which include costs reported in general and
administrative expenses and property operating expenses, by 14%
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Other
Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net includes franchise taxes, risk management
activities, partnership administration expenses and certain
non-recurring items.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, other expenses,
net decreased by $3.2 million, primarily due to
$2.8 million of restructuring costs incurred during 2009
for which there were no comparable costs during 2010 (see
Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
in Item 1 for additional information).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, other expenses,
net changed favorably by $10.4 million, primarily
attributable to the settlement of certain litigation matters in
2010 and restructuring costs incurred during 2009 for which
there were no comparable costs during 2010.
Interest
Expense
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, interest
expense, which includes the amortization of deferred financing
costs, increased by $1.1 million, or 1.5%. Property related
interest expense increased by $3.4 million, primarily due
to a $1.5 million increase related to properties newly
consolidated in 2010 (see Note 2 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for further
discussion of our adoption of ASU
2009-17) and
an increase in interest related to properties refinanced with
higher average rates, partially offset by lower average
outstanding balances. The increase in property related interest
expense was partially offset by a $2.3 million decrease in
corporate interest expense, primarily due to a decrease in the
average outstanding balance on our term loan, which was repaid
during July 2010.
H-32
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, interest expense
decreased by $1.4 million, or 0.6%. Interest expense
decreased due to a $6.5 million decrease in corporate
interest expense, primarily due to a decrease in the average
outstanding balance on our term loan, which was repaid during
July 2010. The decrease in corporate interest expense was offset
by a $5.1 million increase in property related interest
expense. Property related interest expense increased by
$3.3 million due to properties newly consolidated in 2010
and $1.8 million due to properties refinanced with higher
average rates, partially offset by lower average outstanding
balances.
The increases in property interest expense discussed above are a
consequence of our aforementioned leverage strategy, which
focuses on limiting our refunding and re-pricing risk. Pursuant
to this strategy, during 2010 we capitalized on historically low
interest rates by refinancing properties with low variable
interest rates and near term maturities with long-dated,
fixed-rate debt. These refinancing transactions eliminated
maturity and re-pricing risk from our balance sheet and the
long-term fixed-rates will hedge against inflation.
Equity
in (Losses) Earnings of Unconsolidated Real Estate
Partnerships
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated real estate
partnerships includes our share of net earnings or losses of our
unconsolidated real estate partnerships, and may include
impairment losses, gains or losses on the disposition of real
estate assets or depreciation expense which generally exceeds
the net operating income recognized by such unconsolidated
partnerships.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, equity in losses
of unconsolidated real estate partnerships increased
$11.9 million. During the three months ended
September 30, 2010, certain of our consolidated tax credit
funds reduced by $9.8 million their December 31, 2009
investment balances related to unconsolidated low income housing
tax credit partnerships based on changes in the estimated future
tax benefits and residual proceeds. We recognized the equity in
losses in our consolidated financial statements during the three
months ended September 30, 2010. Substantially all of the
equity in losses were attributed to noncontrolling interests in
the consolidated tax credit funds that hold such investments
and, accordingly, had an insignificant effect on net loss
attributable to the Partnership during period. The remainder of
the increase in equity in losses related primarily to losses
recognized by certain partnerships we consolidated during 2010
(see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements in Item 1 for further discussion of our adoption
of ASU
2009-17) for
which no comparable losses were recognized in 2009.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, equity in
losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships increased
$3.1 million. The net increase in losses included our
reversal during the three months ended March 31, 2010, of
approximately $11.2 million of excess equity in losses
recognized during 2008 and 2009, partially offset by the
$9.8 million increase in equity in losses during the three
months ended September 30, 2010 discussed above. The
reversal of excess losses during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and the increase in equity in losses during
the three months ended September 30, 2010 were
substantially attributed to noncontrolling interests in our
consolidated real estate partnerships that hold the related
investments and, accordingly, had an insignificant effect on net
loss attributable to the Partnership during the affected
periods. This net decrease discussed above was offset primarily
by an increase in equity in losses recognized by certain
partnerships we consolidated during 2010.
Gain
on Dispositions of Unconsolidated Real Estate and Other,
Net
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
includes gains on disposition of interests in unconsolidated
real estate partnerships, gains on dispositions of land and
other non-depreciable assets and certain costs related to asset
disposal activities. Changes in the level of gains recognized
from period to period reflect the changing level of disposition
activity from period to period. Additionally, gains on
properties sold are determined on an individual property basis
or in the aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a
single transaction, and are not comparable period to period.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, gain on
dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other decreased
$1.9 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to a
$3.9 million gain from the disposition of our interest in a
group purchasing organization during 2009, partially offset by
gains recognized during 2010 related to our consolidation of
certain previously
H-33
unconsolidated real estate partnerships (see Note 3 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements in
Item 1) and other transactions.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, gain on
dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other decreased
$12.7 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to
$8.6 million of additional proceeds received in 2009
related to our disposition during 2008 of an interest in an
unconsolidated real estate partnership, for which there were no
comparable gains during 2010 and a $3.9 million gain from
the disposition of our interest in a group purchasing
organization during 2009.
Income
Tax Benefit
In conjunction with Aimcos UPREIT structure, certain of
our operations or a portion thereof, such as property
management, asset management and risk management, are conducted
through, and certain of our properties are owned by, taxable
subsidiaries. Income taxes related to the results of continuing
operations of our taxable subsidiaries are included in income
tax benefit in our consolidated statements of operations.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, income tax benefit increased by $1.9 million and
$4.3 million, respectively, primarily due to increases in
losses of our TRS entities.
Income
from Discontinued Operations, Net
The results of operations for properties sold during the period
or designated as held for sale at the end of the period are
generally required to be classified as discontinued operations
for all periods presented. The components of net earnings that
are classified as discontinued operations include all
property-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation
expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale,
property-specific interest expense and debt extinguishment gains
and losses to the extent there is secured debt on the property.
In addition, any impairment losses on assets held for sale and
the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of properties held
for sale are reported in discontinued operations.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
income from discontinued operations totaled $19.7 million
and $45.4 million, respectively. The $25.7 million
decrease in income from discontinued operations was principally
due to a $53.0 million decrease in gain on dispositions of
real estate, net of income taxes, partially offset by a
$8.0 million decrease in interest expense and a
$19.7 million decrease in operating loss (inclusive of a
$25.2 million decrease in real estate impairment losses).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
income from discontinued operations totaled $68.5 million
and $86.3 million, respectively. The $17.8 million
decrease in income from discontinued operations was principally
due to a $56.4 million decrease in gain on dispositions of
real estate, net of income taxes, partially offset by a
$30.0 million decrease in interest expense and a
$13.3 million decrease in operating loss (inclusive of a
$31.4 million decrease in real estate impairment losses).
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we sold
eight consolidated properties for gross proceeds of
$98.7 million and net proceeds of $33.2 million,
resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately
$21.1 million (which is net of less than $0.1 million
of related income taxes). During the three months ended
September 30, 2009, we sold 28 consolidated properties for
gross proceeds of $366.6 million and net proceeds of
$137.8 million, resulting in a gain on sale of
approximately $74.1 million (which includes
$3.2 million of related income taxes).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold 31
consolidated properties for gross proceeds of
$283.5 million and net proceeds of $80.6 million,
resulting in a net gain on sale of approximately
$75.3 million (which includes $0.9 million of related
income taxes). During the nine months ended September 30,
2009, we sold 57 consolidated properties for gross proceeds of
$720.5 million and net proceeds of $259.6 million,
resulting in a gain on sale of approximately $131.8 million
(which is net of $1.7 million of related income taxes).
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, income from discontinued operations includes the operating
results of the properties sold or classified as held for sale as
of September 30, 2010.
H-34
Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period
reflect the changing level of our disposition activity from
period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are
determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate
for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction,
and are not comparable period to period (see Note 3 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 for
additional information on discontinued operations).
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships reflects the non-Aimco partners, or
noncontrolling partners, share of operating results of
consolidated real estate partnerships, as well as the
noncontrolling partners share of property management fees,
interest on notes and other amounts that we charge to such
partnerships.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, we allocated
net losses of $11.2 million to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships, as compared to
$19.3 million of earnings allocated to these noncontrolling
interests during the three months ended September 30, 2009,
or a favorable variance of $30.5 million. This favorable
change was primarily due to a $27.1 million decrease in the
noncontrolling interest partners share of income from
discontinued operations, which decreased primarily due to a
reduction in gains on the disposition of real estate from 2009
to 2010 and a $3.4 million decrease in the noncontrolling
interest partners share of income from continuing
operations of our consolidated real estate partnerships.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net income
attributed to noncontrolling interests in consolidated real
estate partnerships decreased by $26.6 million. This
decrease was primarily due to a $36.2 million decrease in
the noncontrolling interest partners share of income from
discontinued operations, which decreased primarily due to a
reduction in gains on the dispositions of real estate from 2009
to 2010. This decrease was partially offset by a
$9.6 million increase in the noncontrolling interest
partners share of income from continuing operations of our
consolidated real estate partnerships.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, or GAAP, which requires us to make estimates
and assumptions. We believe that the following critical
accounting policies involve our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization,
unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize
an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property.
From time to time, we have non-revenue producing properties that
we hold for future redevelopment. We assess the recoverability
of the carrying amount of these redevelopment properties by
comparing our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows based
on the expected service potential of the redevelopment property
upon completion to the carrying amount. In certain instances, we
use a probability-weighted approach to determine our estimate of
undiscounted future cash flows when alternative courses of
action are under consideration.
Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of risk.
Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance
and value of our real estate investments. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the general economic climate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
competition from other apartment communities and other housing
options;
|
H-35
|
|
|
|
|
local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the
supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment
occupancy or rental rates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of
compliance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due
to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by
increased rents;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of
rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily
housing; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.
|
Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an
impairment of our long-lived assets, including real estate and
investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Based on
periodic tests of recoverability of long-lived assets, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded
$0.3 million of impairment losses related to properties to
be held and used, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we recognized impairment losses of
$0.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related
to properties to be held and used.
Other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in
Item 1 include $68.4 million of goodwill related to
our conventional and affordable reportable segments as of
September 30, 2010. We annually evaluate impairment of
intangible assets using an impairment test that compares the
fair value of the reporting units with the carrying amounts,
including goodwill. We performed our annual impairment analysis
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
concluded no impairment was necessary. We will perform our next
impairment analysis during the second half of 2011 and do not
anticipate recognizing an impairment of goodwill in connection
with this analysis. As further discussed in Note 3 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1, we
allocate goodwill to real estate properties when they are sold
or classified as held for sale, based on the relative fair
values of these properties and the retained properties in each
reportable segment.
Notes
Receivable and Interest Income Recognition
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships
consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which
we are the general partner. Notes receivable from non-affiliates
consist of notes receivable from unrelated third parties. The
ultimate repayment of these notes is subject to a number of
variables, including the performance and value of the underlying
real estate and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders. Our
notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry at
the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as
par value notes, and loans extended by predecessors,
some of whose positions we generally acquired at a discount,
which we refer to as discounted notes.
We record interest income on par value notes as earned in
accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We
discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes
are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise
significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We
record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost recovery
method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the recorded
amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts are
recognized as income.
We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable
based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both
probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be
probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has closed
transactions or has entered into certain pending transactions
(which include real estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and
rights offerings) that provide a reliable source of repayment.
In such instances, we recognize accretion income, on a
prospective basis using the effective interest method over the
estimated remaining term of the loans, equal to the difference
between the carrying amount of the discounted notes and the
estimated collectible value. We record income on all other
discounted notes using the cost recovery method. Accretion
income recognized in any given period is based on our ability to
complete transactions to monetize the notes receivable and the
difference between the carrying value and the estimated
collectible amount of the notes; therefore, accretion income
varies on a period by period basis and could be lower or higher
than in prior periods.
H-36
Provision
for Losses on Notes Receivable
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic
basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of
cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether
estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and
interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note.
We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable
that principal and interest will not be received in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the
impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value
of the partnerships real estate that represents the
primary source of loan repayment. In certain instances where
other sources of cash flow are available to repay the loan, the
impairment is measured by discounting the estimated cash flows.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
recognized net provisions for losses on notes receivable of less
than $0.1 million and during the three months ended
September 30, 2009, we recognized a $1.2 million net
recovery of previously recognized provision for losses on notes
receivable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, we recorded provisions for losses on notes receivable
of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. We
will continue to evaluate the collectibility of these notes, and
we will adjust related allowances in the future due to changes
in market conditions and other factors.
Capitalized
Costs
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred
in connection with our capital additions activities, including
redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property
improvements and replacements of existing property components.
Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated
with time spent by site employees in connection with the
planning, execution and control of all capital additions
activities at the property level. We characterize as
indirect costs an allocation of certain department
costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate
levels that clearly relate to capital additions activities. We
capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods
in which redevelopment and construction projects are in
progress. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not
relate to capital additions activities, including ordinary
repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and
administrative expenses.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, for
continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized
$3.2 million and $2.7 million of interest costs,
respectively, and $5.9 million and $7.8 million of
site payroll and indirect costs, respectively. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, for continuing
and discontinued operations, we capitalized $8.6 million
and $7.1 million of interest costs, respectively, and
$18.7 million and $32.9 million of site payroll and
indirect costs, respectively. The net increase in interest
capitalized from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to our
refinancing of the project financing on a large redevelopment
project at a higher interest rate, partially offset by a
decrease in the average number of units subject to capital
projects. The decrease in the amounts of site payroll and
indirect costs capitalized from 2009 to 2010 is primarily due to
a reduced level of redevelopment activities.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial
obligations. Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from
our operations. Additional sources are proceeds from property
sales, proceeds from refinancings of existing property loans,
borrowings under new property loans and borrowings under our
revolving credit facility.
Our principal uses for liquidity include normal operating
activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding
property debt, capital expenditures, distributions paid to
unitholders and distributions paid to noncontrolling interest
partners and acquisitions of, and investments in, properties. We
use our cash and cash equivalents and our cash provided by
operating activities to meet short-term liquidity needs. In the
event that our cash and cash equivalents and cash provided by
operating activities are not sufficient to cover our short-term
liquidity demands, we have additional means, such as short-term
borrowing availability and proceeds from property sales and
refinancings, to help us meet our short-term liquidity demands.
We may use our revolving credit facility for general corporate
purposes and to fund investments on an interim basis. We expect
to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as debt
maturities and property acquisitions, through long-term
borrowings, primarily
H-37
secured, the issuance of equity securities (including
OP Units), the sale of properties and cash generated from
operations.
The availability of credit and its related effect on the overall
economy may affect our liquidity and future financing
activities, both through changes in interest rates and access to
financing. Currently, interest rates are low compared to
historical levels, many lenders have reentered the market and
the CMBS market is showing signs of recovery. However, any
adverse changes in these factors could negatively affect on our
liquidity. We believe we mitigate this exposure through our
continued focus on reducing our short and intermediate term
maturity risk, by refinancing such loans with long-dated,
fixed-rate property loans. If property financing options become
unavailable for our debt needs, we may consider alternative
sources of liquidity, such as reductions in certain capital
spending or proceeds from asset dispositions.
As further discussed in Item 3, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, we are subject to
interest rate risk associated with certain variable rate
liabilities, preferred units and assets. Based on our net
variable rate liabilities, preferred units and assets
outstanding at September 30, 2010, we estimate that a 1.0%
increase in
30-day LIBOR
with constant credit risk spreads would reduce our income (or
increase our loss) attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders by approximately $0.2 million on an annual
basis.
As further discussed in Note 2 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements in Item 1, we use total
rate of return swaps as a financing product to lower our cost of
borrowing through conversion of fixed-rate debt to
variable-rates. The cost of financing through these arrangements
is generally lower than the fixed rate on the debt. As of
September 30, 2010, we had total rate of return swap
positions with two financial institutions with notional amounts
totaling $307.5 million. Swaps with notional amounts
totaling $278.3 million and $29.2 million have
maturity dates in May 2012 and October 2012, respectively.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
we received net cash receipts of $3.6 million and
$14.7 million, respectively, under the total return swaps,
which positively affected our liquidity. To the extent interest
rates increase above the fixed rates on the underlying
borrowings, our obligations under the total return swaps will
negatively affect our liquidity.
We periodically evaluate counterparty credit risk associated
with these arrangements. At the current time, we have concluded
we do not have material exposure. In the event a counterparty
were to default under these arrangements, loss of the net
interest benefit we generally receive under these arrangements,
which is equal to the difference between the fixed rate we
receive and the variable rate we pay, may adversely affect our
liquidity.
The total rate of return swaps require specified
loan-to-value
ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties
serving as collateral under these agreements decline or if we
sell properties in the collateral pool with low
loan-to-value
ratios, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries have an
obligation to pay down the debt or provide additional collateral
pursuant to the swap agreements, which may adversely affect our
cash flows. The obligation to provide collateral is limited to
these subsidiaries and is non-recourse to the Partnership. At
September 30, 2010, these subsidiaries were not required to
provide cash collateral based on the
loan-to-value
ratios of the real estate properties serving as collateral under
these agreements.
As of September 30, 2010, the amount available under our
revolving credit facility was $258.7 million (after giving
effect to $41.3 million outstanding for undrawn letters of
credit issued under the revolving credit facility).
At September 30, 2010, we had $145.1 million in cash
and cash equivalents, an increase of $63.8 million from
December 31, 2009. At September 30, 2010, we had
$216.4 million of restricted cash, primarily consisting of
reserves and escrows held by lenders for bond sinking funds,
capital additions, property taxes and insurance. In addition,
cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are held by
partnerships that are not presented on a consolidated basis. The
following discussion relates to changes in cash due to
operating, investing and financing activities, which are
presented in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows
in Item 1.
Operating
Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our net cash
provided by operating activities of $190.2 million was
primarily related to operating income from our consolidated
properties, which is affected primarily by rental rates,
occupancy levels and operating expenses related to our portfolio
of properties, in excess of payments of operating accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, including amounts related to
our organizational restructuring
H-38
(see Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements in Item 1). Cash provided by operating
activities increased $52.8 million compared with the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, driven primarily by a
decrease in payments on accounts payable and accrued expenses,
including payments related to our restructuring accruals, in
2010 as compared to 2009.
Investing
Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our net cash
provided by investing activities of $41.7 million consisted
primarily of proceeds from disposition of real estate and a net
increase in cash from partnerships consolidated and
deconsolidated in connection with our adoption of ASU
2009-17 (see
Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements
in Item 1), partially offset by capital expenditures.
Although we hold all of our properties for investment, we sell
properties when they do not meet our investment criteria or are
located in areas that we believe do not justify our continued
investment when compared to alternative uses for our capital.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold 31
consolidated properties for an aggregate sales price of
$283.5 million, generating proceeds totaling
$273.5 million, after the payment of transaction costs and
debt prepayment penalties. The $273.5 million in proceeds
is inclusive of debt assumed by buyers. Net cash proceeds from
property sales were used primarily to repay property debt and
for other corporate purposes.
Capital expenditures totaled $130.8 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, and consisted primarily of
Capital Improvements and Capital Replacements, and to a lesser
extent included spending for redevelopment projects and
casualties.
Financing
Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash used
in financing activities of $168.1 million was primarily
attributed to debt principal payments, distributions paid to
common and preferred unitholders and distributions to
noncontrolling interests. Proceeds from property loans and our
issuance of preferred units partially offset the cash outflows.
Property
Debt
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had
$5.5 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively, in
consolidated property debt outstanding, which included
$6.4 million and $178.3 million, respectively, of
property debt classified within liabilities related to assets
held for sale. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, we refinanced or closed property loans on 14 properties
generating $167.4 million of proceeds from borrowings with
a weighted average interest rate of 5.26%. Our share of the net
proceeds after repayment of existing debt, payment of
transaction costs and distributions to limited partners, was
$82.6 million. We used these total net proceeds for capital
additions and other corporate purposes. We intend to continue to
refinance property debt primarily as a means of extending
current and near term maturities and to finance certain capital
projects.
Credit
Facility
We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement,
as amended, which we refer to as the Credit Agreement. During
September 2010, we amended the Credit Agreement to, among other
things, increase the revolving commitments from
$180.0 million to $300.0 million, extend the maturity
from May 2012 to May 2014 (both inclusive of a one year
extension option) and reduce the LIBOR floor on the
facilitys base interest rate from 2.00% to 1.50%.
As of September 30, 2010, the Credit Agreement consisted of
$300.0 million of revolving loan commitments. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a
pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 5.00%
with a LIBOR floor of 1.50% or, at our option, a base rate equal
to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.75%). The revolving credit
facility matures May 1, 2013, and may be extended for an
additional year, subject to certain conditions, including
payment of a 35.0 basis point fee on the total revolving
commitments.
H-39
The amount available under the revolving credit facility at
September 30, 2010, was $258.7 million (after giving
effect to $41.3 million outstanding for undrawn letters of
credit issued under the revolving credit facility). The proceeds
of revolving loans are generally used to fund working capital
and for other corporate purposes.
Our Credit Agreement requires us to satisfy covenant ratios of
earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and
amortization to debt service and earnings to fixed charges of
1.40:1 and 1.20:1, respectively. For the twelve months ended
September 30, 2010, as calculated based on the provisions
in our Credit Agreement, we had a ratio of earnings before
interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization to debt
service of 1.58:1 and a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of
1.34:1.
Partners
Capital Transactions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid
cash distributions totaling $43.8 million and
$37.7 million to preferred and common unitholders,
respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid
cash distributions of $37.6 million to noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate partnerships, primarily
related to property sales during 2010 and late 2009.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, Aimco
sold 4,000,000 shares of its 7.75% Class U Cumulative
Preferred Stock for net proceeds of $96.1 million (after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
transaction expenses of $3.3 million). Aimco contributed
the net proceeds to us in exchange for 4,000,000 units of
our 7.75% Class U Cumulative Preferred Units. During
September 2010, Aimco also gave notice that it intended to
redeem the 4,050,000 outstanding shares of its 9.375%
Class G Cumulative Preferred Stock, and on October 7,
2010, Aimco completed this redemption for $101.3 million
plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $2.2 million.
Concurrent with this redemption, we redeemed all of our
outstanding Class G Cumulative Preferred Units, 4,040,000
of which were held by Aimco and 10,000 of which were held by a
consolidate subsidiary.
We and Aimco have a shelf registration statement that provides
for the issuance of debt securities by us and debt and equity
securities by Aimco.
Future
Capital Needs
We expect to fund any future acquisitions, redevelopment
projects, capital improvements and capital replacements
principally with proceeds from property sales (including
tax-free exchange proceeds), short-term borrowings, debt and
equity financing (including tax credit equity) and operating
cash flows.
Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
During July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, or the Act, was signed into federal law. The
provisions of the Act include new regulations for
over-the-counter
derivatives and substantially increased regulation and risk of
liability for credit rating agencies, all of which could
increase our cost of capital. The Act also includes provisions
concerning corporate governance and executive compensation
which, among other things, require additional executive
compensation disclosures and enhanced independence requirements
for board compensation committees and related advisors, as well
as provide explicit authority for the Securities and Exchange
Commission to adopt proxy access, all of which could result in
additional expenses in order to maintain compliance. The Act is
wide-ranging, and the provisions are broad with significant
discretion given to the many and varied agencies tasked with
adopting and implementing the Act. The majority of the
provisions of the Act do not go into effect immediately and may
be adopted and implemented over many months or years. As such,
we cannot predict the full impact of the Act on our financial
condition or results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Our primary market risk exposure relates to changes in base
interest rates, credit risk spreads and availability of credit.
We are not subject to any other material market rate or price
risks. We use predominantly long-term, fixed-rate non-recourse
property debt in order to avoid the refunding and repricing
risks of short-term borrowings. We use
H-40
short-term debt financing and working capital primarily to fund
short-term uses and acquisitions and generally expect to
refinance such borrowings with cash from operating activities,
property sales proceeds, long-term debt or equity financings. We
use total
rate-of-return
swaps to obtain the benefit of variable rates on certain of our
fixed-rate debt instruments. We make limited use of other
derivative financial instruments and we do not use them for
trading or other speculative purposes.
We had $525.0 million of floating rate debt and
$57.0 million of floating rate preferred units outstanding
at September 30, 2010. Of the total floating rate debt, the
major components were floating rate tax-exempt bond financing
($405.7 million) and floating rate secured notes
($108.5 million). At September 30, 2010, we had
approximately $502.2 million in cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash and notes receivable, the majority of which bear
interest. The effect of our interest bearing assets would
partially reduce the effect of an increase in variable interest
rates. Historically, changes in tax-exempt interest rates have
been at a ratio of less than 1:1 with changes in taxable
interest rates. Floating rate tax-exempt bond financing is
benchmarked against the SIFMA rate, which since 1990 has
averaged 74% of the
30-day LIBOR
rate. If the historical relationship continues, we estimate that
an increase in
30-day LIBOR
of 100 basis points (74 basis points for tax-exempt
interest rates) with constant credit risk spreads would result
in net income and net income attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders being reduced (or the
amounts of net loss and net loss attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders being increased) by
$0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, on an
annual basis.
The estimated aggregate fair value and carrying amount of our
consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities
related to assets held for sale) was approximately
$6.0 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively at
September 30, 2010. If market rates for our fixed-rate debt
were higher by 1.0% with constant credit risk spreads, the
estimated fair value of our debt discussed above would decrease
from $6.0 billion to $5.7 billion. If market rates for
our debt discussed above were lower by 1.0% with constant credit
risk spreads, the estimated fair value of our fixed-rate debt
would increase from $6.0 billion to $6.4 billion.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Partnerships management, with the participation of the
chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
General Partner, who are the equivalent of the
Partnerships chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on such evaluation, the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer of the General Partner have
concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the third quarter of 2010 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
H-41
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
As of the date of this report, there have been no material
changes from the risk factors in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities. We did not issue any common
OP Units in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A
Common Stock during the three months ended September 30,
2010. On September 7, 2010, we issued 4,000,000
Class U Partnership Preferred Units to the Special Limited
Partner for $96.1 million in cash, which was contributed by
Aimco to the Special Limited Partner and represents the net
proceeds from the concurrent underwritten public offering of
Aimcos 7.75% Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock. The
issuance of the Class U Partnership Preferred Units was
exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(c) Repurchases of Equity Securities. Our
Partnership Agreement generally provides that after holding the
common OP Units for one year, our Limited Partners have the
right to redeem their common OP Units for cash, subject to
our prior right to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the
common OP Units tendered for redemption in exchange for
shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. Common OP Units
redeemed for Aimco Class A Common Stock are generally
exchanged on a
one-for-one
basis (subject to antidilution adjustments). During the three
months ended September 30, 2010, no common OP Units
were redeemed in exchange for Aimco Class A Common Stock.
The following table summarizes repurchases of our equity
securities for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
of Units that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Purchased
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Unit
|
|
|
or Programs(1)
|
|
|
Programs(2)
|
|
|
July 1 July 31, 2010
|
|
|
8,259
|
|
|
$
|
21.32
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
August 1 August 31, 2010
|
|
|
25,803
|
|
|
|
21.32
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
September 1 September 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,268
|
|
|
|
20.24
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,330
|
|
|
$
|
21.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The terms of our Partnership Agreement do not provide for a
maximum number of units that may be repurchased, and other than
the express terms of our Partnership Agreement, we have no
publicly announced plans or programs of repurchase. However,
whenever Aimco repurchases shares of its Class A Common
Stock, it is expected that Aimco will fund the repurchase with
proceeds from a concurrent repurchase by us of common OP Units
held by Aimco at a price per unit that is equal to the price per
share paid for its Class A Common Stock. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aimcos board of directors has, from time to time,
authorized Aimco to repurchase shares of its Class A Common
Stock. As of September 30, 2010, Aimco was authorized to
repurchase approximately 19.3 million additional shares.
This authorization has no expiration date. These repurchases may
be made from time to time in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions. |
Distribution Payments. Our Credit Agreement
includes customary covenants, including a restriction on
distributions and other restricted payments, but permits
distributions during any
12-month
period in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of our Funds From
Operations, subject to certain non-cash adjustments, for such
period or such amount as may be necessary for Aimco to maintain
its REIT status.
H-42
The following exhibits are filed with this report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 29, 2010, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
swing line lender and L/C issuer, and the lenders party thereto
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 29, 2010, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Agreement Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt Instruments
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Schedules and supplemental materials to the exhibits have been
omitted but will be provided to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request. |
H-43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
By: AIMCO-GP, Inc., its general partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
|
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(duly authorized officer and principal financial officer)
Paul Beldin
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Date: October 29, 2010
H-44
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 29, 2010, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
swing line lender and L/C issuer, and the lenders party thereto
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 29, 2010, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Agreement Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt Instruments
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Schedules and supplemental materials to the exhibits have been
omitted but will be provided to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request. |
H-45
Exhibit 31.1
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
I, Terry Considine, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of AIMCO Properties, L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Terry Considine
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(equivalent of the chief executive officer of AIMCO Properties,
L.P.)
Date: October 29, 2010
H-46
Exhibit 31.2
CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
I, Ernest M. Freedman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
of AIMCO Properties, L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(equivalent of the chief financial officer of AIMCO Properties,
L.P.)
Date: October 29, 2010
H-47
Exhibit 32.1
Certification
of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AIMCO Properties,
L.P. (the Partnership) on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Terry Considine, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Partnership hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.
Terry Considine
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(equivalent of the chief executive officer of AIMCO Properties,
L.P.)
October 29, 2010
H-48
Exhibit 32.2
Certification
of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AIMCO Properties,
L.P. (the Partnership) on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Ernest M. Freedman, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Partnership hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(equivalent of the chief financial officer of AIMCO Properties,
L.P.)
October 29, 2010
H-49
Exhibit 99.1
Agreement
Regarding Disclosure of Long-Term Debt Instruments
In reliance upon Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of
Regulation S-K,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
Partnership), has not filed as an exhibit to its
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, any
instrument with respect to long-term debt not being registered
where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does
not exceed ten percent of the total assets of the Partnership
and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to
Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of
Regulation S-K,
the Partnership hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such
agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
By: AIMCO-GP, Inc., its general partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Ernest
M. Freedman
|
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
October 29, 2010
H-50
Annex I
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
|
November 19, 2010
|
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
0-24497
|
|
84-1275621
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Commission
File Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET PARKWAY
SUITE 1100, DENVER, CO 80237
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants
telephone number, including area code
(303) 757-8101
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K
filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing
obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:
|
|
|
|
o
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the
Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Soliciting material pursuant to
Rule 14a-12
under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to
Rule 14d-2(b)
under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to
Rule 13e-4(c)
under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
|
I-1
AIMCO Properties, L.P. (the Partnership) is
re-issuing its historical financial statements included in its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, to reflect additional
properties sold or classified as held for sale during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as discontinued operations
in accordance with the requirements of FASB Accounting Standards
Codification
205-20,
Discontinued Operations. These reclassifications have no
effect on the Partnerships reported net income available
to common unitholders or funds from operations.
Additionally, the Partnership revised its reportable business
segments during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
Partnership determined its investment management reporting unit
no longer met the requirements for a reportable segment; and in
order to provide more meaningful information regarding its real
estate operations, the Partnership elected to disaggregate
information for the prior real estate segment. As a result of
these changes, the Partnership now has two reportable segments:
conventional real estate operations and affordable real estate
operations. Accordingly, the Partnership has updated
Note 17 of the consolidated financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations included in exhibit 99.1 to be
consistent with the new presentation.
As a result of the changes discussed above, the Partnership is
updating Item 6 Selected Financial
Data, Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data. All other information
contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 has not been updated
or modified. For more recent information regarding the
Partnership, please see the Partnerships Quarterly Reports
on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and other reports and information filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission since February 26, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 9.01.
|
Financial
Statements and Exhibits.
|
(d) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed with this report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Form 10-K, Item 6. Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
Form 10-K, Item 7. Managements
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
Form 10-K, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
I-2
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc., its General Partner
|
/s/ Ernest M. Freedman
Ernest M. Freedman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ Paul Beldin
Paul Beldin
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: November 19, 2010
I-3
Exhibit 99.1
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following selected financial data is based on our audited
historical financial statements. This information should be read
in conjunction with such financial statements, including the
notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included herein or in previous filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)(2)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
OPERATING DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,151,736
|
|
|
$
|
1,199,423
|
|
|
$
|
1,132,109
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,683
|
|
|
$
|
866,992
|
|
Total operating expenses(3)
|
|
|
(1,051,394
|
)
|
|
|
(1,151,459
|
)
|
|
|
(958,070
|
)
|
|
|
(879,107
|
)
|
|
|
(731,102
|
)
|
Operating income(3)
|
|
|
100,342
|
|
|
|
47,964
|
|
|
|
174,039
|
|
|
|
164,576
|
|
|
|
135,890
|
|
Loss from continuing operations(3)
|
|
|
(197,883
|
)
|
|
|
(118,377
|
)
|
|
|
(49,348
|
)
|
|
|
(41,838
|
)
|
|
|
(31,908
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net(4)
|
|
|
153,903
|
|
|
|
746,165
|
|
|
|
175,603
|
|
|
|
331,820
|
|
|
|
161,718
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(43,980
|
)
|
|
|
627,788
|
|
|
|
126,255
|
|
|
|
289,982
|
|
|
|
129,810
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(22,442
|
)
|
|
|
(155,749
|
)
|
|
|
(92,138
|
)
|
|
|
(92,917
|
)
|
|
|
(49,064
|
)
|
Net income attributable to preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(56,854
|
)
|
|
|
(61,354
|
)
|
|
|
(73,144
|
)
|
|
|
(90,527
|
)
|
|
|
(98,946
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
|
403,700
|
|
|
|
(43,508
|
)
|
|
|
104,592
|
|
|
|
(22,458
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and diluted(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.32
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
$
|
6,795,896
|
|
|
$
|
6,957,136
|
|
|
$
|
6,730,419
|
|
|
$
|
6,265,799
|
|
|
$
|
5,573,996
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
9,456,721
|
|
|
|
10,631,746
|
|
|
|
10,305,903
|
|
|
|
10,031,761
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
|
5,541,148
|
|
|
|
5,919,771
|
|
|
|
5,534,154
|
|
|
|
4,852,928
|
|
|
|
4,192,292
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
1,550,374
|
|
|
|
1,661,600
|
|
|
|
2,152,326
|
|
|
|
2,753,617
|
|
|
|
3,164,111
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common unit
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
Total consolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
95,202
|
|
|
|
117,719
|
|
|
|
153,758
|
|
|
|
162,432
|
|
|
|
158,548
|
|
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period)
|
|
|
8,478
|
|
|
|
9,613
|
|
|
|
10,878
|
|
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
|
35,269
|
|
Units managed (end of period)(6)
|
|
|
31,974
|
|
|
|
35,475
|
|
|
|
38,404
|
|
|
|
42,190
|
|
|
|
46,667
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the
September 30, 2010 financial statement presentation,
including retroactive adjustments to reflect additional
properties sold or classified as held for sale as of
September 30, 2010, as discontinued operations (see
Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8), and retroactive adjustments related to our
January 1, 2009 adoption of the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141(R), or SFAS 141(R), FASB
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, or
SFAS 160, and FASB Staff Position No. EITF
03-6-1, or
FSP EITF
03-6-1 (see
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2008, has been restated to reclassify
impairment losses on real estate development assets within
operating income. The reclassification reduced operating income
by $91.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
and had no effect on the reported amounts of loss from
continuing operations, net income, net income available to the
Partnerships common unitholders or earnings per unit.
Additionally, the reclassification had no effect on the
consolidated balance sheets, statements of partners
capital or statements of cash flows. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Total operating expenses, operating income and loss from
continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008,
include a $91.1 million pre-tax provision for impairment
losses on real estate development assets, which is |
I-4
|
|
|
|
|
discussed further in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in
Item 7. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Income from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes
$221.8 million, $800.3 million, $117.6 million,
$337.1 million and $162.7 million in gains on
disposition of real estate, respectively. Income from
discontinued operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007 is discussed
further in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Weighted average common units, common OP unit equivalents,
dilutive preferred securities and earnings per unit amounts for
each of the periods presented above have been adjusted for our
application during the fourth quarter 2009 of a change in
accounting, which requires the units issued in our special
distributions paid in 2008 and January 2009 to be treated as
issued and outstanding on the distribution payment dates for
basic purposes and as potential unit equivalents for the periods
between the ex-dividend dates and payment dates for diluted
purposes, rather than treating the units as issued and
outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest period presented
for both basic and diluted purposes. See Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further
discussion of this accounting change. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Units managed represents units in properties for which we
provide asset management services only, although in certain
cases we may indirectly own generally less than one percent of
the economic interest in such properties through a partnership
syndication or other fund. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Executive
Overview
We are a limited partnership engaged in the acquisition,
ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties.
We are the operating partnership for Aimco, which is a
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust,
or REIT. Our property operations are characterized by
diversification of product, location and price point. We
primarily invest in the 20 largest U.S. markets, as
measured by total market capitalization, which is the total
market value of institutional-grade apartment properties in a
particular market. We define these markets as target
markets and they possess the following characteristics: a
high concentration of population and apartment units; geographic
and employment diversification; and historically strong returns
with reduced volatility as part of a diversified portfolio. We
are one of the largest owners and operators of apartment
properties in the United States. As of December 31, 2009,
we owned or managed 870 apartment properties containing
135,654 units located in 44 states, the District of
Columbia and Puerto Rico. Our primary sources of income and cash
are rents associated with apartment leases.
The key financial indicators that we use in managing our
business and in evaluating our financial condition and operating
performance are: NAV; Funds From Operations, or FFO; Adjusted
FFO, or AFFO, which is FFO less spending for Capital
Replacements; same store property operating results; net
operating income; Free Cash Flow, which is net operating income
less spending for Capital Replacements; financial coverage
ratios; and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. FFO and
Capital Replacements are defined and further described in the
sections captioned Funds From Operations and
Capital Additions below. The key macro-economic
factors and non-financial indicators that affect our financial
condition and operating performance are: household formations;
rates of job growth; single-family and multifamily housing
starts; interest rates; and availability and cost of financing.
Because our operating results depend primarily on income from
our properties, the supply and demand for apartments influences
our operating results. Additionally, the level of expenses
required to operate and maintain our properties and the pace and
price at which we redevelop, acquire and dispose of our
apartment properties affect our operating results. Our cost of
capital is affected by the conditions in the capital and credit
markets and the terms that we negotiate for our equity and debt
financings.
During the challenging financial and economic environment in
2009, we focused on: serving and retaining residents;
continually improving our portfolio; reducing leverage and
financial risk; and simplifying our business model.
We are focused on owning and operating B/B+ quality apartments
concentrated in our target markets. We intend to upgrade the
quality of our portfolio through the sale of approximately 5% to
10% of our portfolio annually, with the proceeds generally used
to increase our allocation of capital to well located properties
within our target markets through capital investments,
redevelopment or acquisitions.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of our
operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction
with the accompanying consolidated financial statements in
Item 8.
I-5
Results
of Operations
Overview
2009
compared to 2008
We reported net loss attributable to the Partnership of
$66.4 million and net loss attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders of $123.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to net income
attributable to the Partnership of $472.0 million and net
income attributable to the Partnerships common unitholders
of $403.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, decreases of $538.4 million and $527.0 million,
respectively. These decreases were principally due to the
following items, all of which are discussed in further detail
below:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in income from discontinued operations, primarily
related to our sale of fewer assets in 2009 and the recognition
of lower gains on sales as compared to 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate
and other, primarily due to a large gain on the sale of an
interest in an unconsolidated real estate partnership in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily
related to completed redevelopments and capital additions placed
in service for partial periods during 2008 or 2009; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in asset management and tax credit revenues,
primarily due to a reduction in promote income, which is income
earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by
our consolidated joint ventures.
|
The effects of these items on our operating results were
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in earnings allocable to noncontrolling interests,
primarily due to a decrease in the noncontrolling
interests share of the decrease in gains on sales
discussed above;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in general and administrative expenses, primarily
related to reductions in personnel and related expenses from our
organizational restructuring activities during 2008 and
2009; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
impairment losses on real estate development assets in 2008, for
which no similar impairments were recognized in 2009.
|
2008
compared to 2007
We reported net income attributable to the Partnership of
$472.0 million and net income attributable to the
Partnerships Aimco common unitholders of
$403.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to net income attributable to the Partnership of
$34.1 million and net loss attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders of $43.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, increases of
$437.9 million and $447.2 million, respectively. These
increases were principally due to the following items, all of
which are discussed in further detail below:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in income from discontinued operations, primarily
related to an increase in the number of assets sold during 2008
and our recognition of higher gains on sales as compared to 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real
estate and other, primarily due to a large gain on the sale of
an interest in an unconsolidated real estate partnership in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income associated with property
operations, reflecting improved operations of our same store
properties and other properties; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in asset management and tax credit revenues,
primarily due to an increase in promote income, which is income
earned in connection with the disposition of properties owned by
our consolidated joint ventures.
|
The effects of these items on our operating results were
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
impairment losses on real estate development assets in 2008, for
which no similar impairments were recognized in 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in earnings allocable to noncontrolling interests,
primarily due to an increase in the noncontrolling
interests share of the increase in gains on sales
discussed above;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation and amortization expense, primarily
related to completed redevelopments placed in service for
partial periods during 2007 or 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring costs recognized during the fourth quarter of
2008; and
|
I-6
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in provisions for losses on notes receivable,
primarily due to the impairment during 2008 of our interest in
Casden Properties LLC.
|
The following paragraphs discuss these and other items affecting
the results of our operations in more detail.
Business
Segment Operating Results
As of December 31, 2009, we had two reportable segments:
real estate (owning, operating and redeveloping apartments) and
investment management (portfolio management and asset
management). Based on a planned reduction in our transactional
activities, during the three months ended March 31, 2010,
we reevaluated our reportable segments and determined our
investment management reporting unit no longer meets the
requirements for a reportable segment. Additionally, to provide
more meaningful information regarding our real estate
operations, we elected to disaggregate information for the prior
real estate segment. Following these changes, we have two
reportable segments: conventional real estate operations and
affordable real estate operations, which are discussed in
further detail below.
Real
Estate Operations
Our real estate portfolio is comprised of two business
components: conventional real estate operations and affordable
real estate operations, which also represent our two reportable
segments. Our conventional real estate portfolio consists of
market-rate apartments with rents paid by the resident and
includes 226 properties with 70,758 units. Our affordable
real estate portfolio consists of 244 properties with
28,034 units, with rents that are generally paid, in whole
or part, by a government agency. Our conventional and affordable
properties contributed 87% and 13%, respectively, of our
property net operating income attributed to the
Partnerships common unitholders during the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Our chief operating decision maker uses various generally
accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance
and financial condition of the business, including: net
operating income; Net Asset Value; Pro forma Funds From
Operations; Adjusted Funds From Operations; same store property
operating results; Free Cash Flow; financial coverage ratios;
and leverage as shown on our balance sheet. Our chief operating
decision maker emphasizes net operating income as a key
measurement of segment profit or loss. Segment net operating
income is generally defined as segment revenues less direct
segment operating expenses.
The following table summarizes the net operating income of our
real estate operations, including our conventional and
affordable segments, for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional real estate operations
|
|
$
|
909,218
|
|
|
$
|
913,793
|
|
|
$
|
882,545
|
|
Affordable real estate operations
|
|
|
187,583
|
|
|
|
180,456
|
|
|
|
168,885
|
|
Corporate and amounts not allocated
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
6,344
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,101,883
|
|
|
|
1,100,593
|
|
|
|
1,058,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional real estate operations
|
|
|
363,863
|
|
|
|
360,479
|
|
|
|
354,455
|
|
Affordable real estate operations
|
|
|
92,416
|
|
|
|
91,867
|
|
|
|
83,126
|
|
Corporate and amounts not allocated
|
|
|
59,469
|
|
|
|
74,870
|
|
|
|
69,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
515,748
|
|
|
|
527,216
|
|
|
|
507,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operations net operating income
|
|
$
|
586,135
|
|
|
$
|
573,377
|
|
|
$
|
550,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, our real estate operations net
operating income increased $12.8 million, or 2.2%, due to
an increase in rental and other property revenues of
$1.3 million, or 0.1%, and a decrease in property operating
expenses of $11.5 million, or 2.2%.
Our conventional real estate operations net operating income
decreased $8.0 million, or 1.4%, from $553.3 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008 to
$545.3 million during the year ended December 31,
2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to our
conventional same store properties, including a
$10.1 million, or 1.4%, decrease in revenues due to lower
average rent (approximately $19 per unit) and a decrease of
30 basis points in average physical occupancy, and
$1.4 million increase in expenses due to increases in
payroll, repairs and maintenance, and insurance expenses,
partially offset by decreases in contract services, marketing
and administrative expenses. The decrease in conventional net
operating income associated with our same store properties was
partially offset by a $3.5 million increase in net
operating
I-7
income associated with our conventional non-same store
properties. Revenues of our conventional non-same store
properties increased $5.5 million, primarily due to an
$8.1 million increase in redevelopment revenues, primarily
due to more units in service at these properties in 2009,
partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in expenses
related to our non-same store properties, primarily due to
increases in real estate taxes and expenses related to
properties newly consolidated in 2009.
Our affordable real estate operations net operating income
increased $6.6 million, or 7.4%, from $88.6 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008, to
$95.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2009.
This increase in net operating income was primarily due to
increases in revenues of our affordable properties of
$7.1 million, including a $5.0 million increase
primarily due to higher average rents partially offset by lower
physical occupancy, and a $2.1 million increase related to
properties that were newly consolidated in 2009.
Real estate operations net operating income includes property
management revenues and expenses and casualty losses, which we
do not allocate to our conventional or affordable segments for
purposes of evaluating segment performance. Property management
revenues decreased by $1.3 million, due to a reduction in
the number of properties managed due to sales. Expenses not
allocated to our conventional or affordable segments decreased
by $15.4 million, primarily due to a $16.6 million
decrease in property management expenses, resulting primarily
from reductions in personnel and related costs attributed to our
restructuring activities (see Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8).
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, our real estate operations net
operating income increased $22.4 million, or 4.1%, due to
an increase in rental and other property revenues of
$42.2 million, or 4.0%, partially offset by an increase in
property operating expenses of $19.8 million, or 3.9%.
Our conventional real estate operations net operating income
increased $25.2 million, or 4.8%, from $528.1 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007 to
$553.3 million during the year ended December 31,
2008. This increase was primarily attributable to our
conventional same store properties, including a
$22.2 million, or 3.1%, increase in revenues due to higher
average rent (approximately $21 per unit) and an increase of
80 basis points in average physical occupancy, partially
offset by a $1.7 million increase in expenses due to
increases in utility, real estate tax, marketing, administrative
and contract service expenses, offset by decreases in payroll,
turnover and repair and maintenance expenses. In addition to the
increase in conventional same store net operating income, net
operating income related to our conventional non-same store
properties increased by $4.7 million. Revenues of our
conventional non-same store properties increased
$9.0 million, primarily due to a $6.5 million increase
in redevelopment revenues due to more units in service during
2008, partially offset by a $4.3 million increase in
expenses of our conventional non-same store properties primarily
due to increases in payroll, real estate tax, contract services
and marketing expenses.
Our affordable real estate operations net operating income
increased $2.8 million, or 3.3%, from $85.8 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007, to
$88.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Revenues of our affordable properties increased by
$11.5 million and expenses of our affordable properties
increased by $8.7 million, primarily due to properties
newly consolidated during late 2007.
Real estate operations net operating income includes property
management revenues and expenses and casualty losses, which we
do not allocate to our conventional or affordable segments for
purposes of evaluating segment performance. Property management
revenues decreased by $0.6 million, primarily attributable
to a reduction in the number of properties managed due to sales.
Expenses not allocated to our conventional or affordable
segments increased by $5.0 million, primarily due to a
$2.8 million increase in casualty losses, primarily due to
properties damaged by Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike in
2008, and a $2.2 million increase in property management
expenses.
Asset
Management and Tax Credit Revenues
We perform activities and services for consolidated and
unconsolidated real estate partnerships, including portfolio
strategy, capital allocation, joint ventures, tax credit
syndication, acquisitions, dispositions and other transaction
activities. Within our owned portfolio, we refer to these
activities as Portfolio Management, and their
benefit is seen in property operating results and in gains on
dispositions. For affiliated partnerships, we refer to these
activities as asset management, for which we are separately
compensated through fees paid by third party investors. These
activities are conducted in part by our taxable subsidiaries,
and the related net operating income may be subject to income
taxes.
Asset management revenue may include certain fees that were
earned in a prior period, but not recognized at that time
because collectibility was not reasonably assured. Those fees
may be recognized in a subsequent period upon occurrence of a
transaction or a high level of the probability of occurrence of
a transaction, or improvement in operations that generates
sufficient cash to pay the fees.
I-8
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, asset management and tax credit
revenues decreased $49.0 million. This decrease is
primarily attributable to a $42.8 million decrease in
promote income, which is income earned in connection with the
disposition of properties owned by our consolidated joint
ventures, due to fewer related sales in 2009, a
$7.6 million decrease in other general partner
transactional fees and a $2.2 million decrease in asset
management fees, offset by a $3.6 million increase in
revenues associated with our affordable housing tax credit
syndication business, including syndication fees and other
revenue earned in connection with these arrangements.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, asset management and tax credit
revenues increased $25.1 million. This increase is
primarily attributable to a $30.7 million increase in
promote income, which is income earned in connection with the
disposition of properties owned by our consolidated joint
ventures, and a $10.3 million increase in other general
partner transactional fees. These increases are offset by a
decrease of $10.0 million in asset management fees and a
decrease of $5.9 million in revenues associated with our
affordable housing tax credit syndication business, including
syndication fees and other revenue earned in connection with
these arrangements.
Investment
Management Expenses
Investment management expenses consist primarily of the costs of
departments that perform asset management and tax credit
activities. For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared
to the year ended December 31, 2008, investment management
expenses decreased $9.0 million, primarily due to
reductions in personnel and related costs from our
organizational restructurings and a reduction in transaction
costs related to our retroactive adoption of SFAS 141 (R)
(see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8).
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, investment management expenses
increased $4.3 million, primarily due to a
$3.5 million increase in acquisition costs.
Other
Operating Expenses (Income)
Depreciation
and Amortization
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, depreciation and amortization
increased $50.8 million, or 13.3%. This increase primarily
consists of depreciation related to properties acquired during
the latter part of 2008, completed redevelopments and other
capital projects recently placed in service.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, depreciation and amortization
increased $45.3 million, or 13.4%. This increase reflects
depreciation of $65.1 million for newly acquired
properties, completed redevelopments and other capital projects
recently placed in service. This increase was partially offset
by a decrease of $25.7 million in depreciation adjustments
necessary to reduce the carrying amount of buildings and
improvements to their estimated disposition value, or zero in
the case of a planned demolition, primarily due to a property
that became fully depreciated during 2007.
Provision
for Operating Real Estate Impairment Losses
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization,
unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize
an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2007, we
recognized impairment losses of $2.3 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, related to properties
classified as held for use as of December 31, 2009. We
recognized no such impairment losses during the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Provision
for Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development
Assets
In connection with the preparation of our 2008 annual financial
statements, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in
our Lincoln Place property, located in Venice, California. Based
upon the decline in land values in Southern California during
2008 and the expected timing of our redevelopment efforts, we
determined that the total carrying amount of the property was no
longer probable of full recovery and, accordingly, during the
three months ended December 31, 2008, recognized an
impairment loss of $85.4 million ($55.6 million net of
tax).
I-9
Similarly, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in
Pacific Bay Vistas (formerly Treetops), a vacant property
located in San Bruno, California, and determined that the
carrying amount of the property was no longer probable of full
recovery and, accordingly, we recognized an impairment loss of
$5.7 million for this property during the three months
ended December 31, 2008.
The impairments discussed above totaled $91.1 million and
are included in provisions for impairment losses on real estate
development assets in our consolidated statement of income for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8.
We recognized no similar impairments on real estate development
assets during the years ended December 31, 2009 or 2007.
General
and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative
expenses decreased $23.7 million, or 29.5%. This decrease
is primarily attributable to reductions in personnel and related
expenses associated with our organizational restructurings (see
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8), pursuant to which we eliminated approximately 400,
or 36%, of our offsite positions between December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, general and administrative
expenses increased $8.0 million, or 11.1%. This increase is
primarily attributable to higher personnel and related expenses
of $6.1 million and an increase of $1.5 million in
information technology communications costs.
Other
Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net includes franchise taxes, risk management
activities, partnership administration expenses and certain
non-recurring items.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, other expenses, net decreased by
$6.3 million. The decrease is primarily attributable to a
$5.4 million write-off during 2008 of certain
communications hardware and capitalized costs in 2008, and a
$5.3 million reduction in expenses of our self insurance
activities, including a decrease in casualty losses on less than
wholly owned properties from 2008 to 2009. These decreases are
partially offset by an increase of $4.8 million in costs
related to certain litigation matters.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, other expenses, net increased by
$3.1 million. The increase includes a $5.4 million
write-off of certain communications hardware and capitalized
costs during 2008 and a $1.2 million write-off of
redevelopment costs associated with a change in the planned use
of a property during 2008. The net unfavorable change also
reflects $3.6 million of income recognized in 2007 related
to the transfer of certain property rights to an unrelated
party. These increases were partially offset by a
$3.7 million reduction in expenses of our self insurance
activities (net of costs in 2008 related to Tropical Storm Fay
and Hurricane Ike) and a net decrease of $2.0 million in
costs related to certain litigation matters.
Restructuring
Costs
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized
restructuring costs of $11.2 million, as compared to
$22.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2008,
related to our organizational restructurings, which are further
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8. We recognized no restructuring costs
during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest
Income
Interest income consists primarily of interest on notes
receivable from non-affiliates and unconsolidated real estate
partnerships, interest on cash and restricted cash accounts, and
accretion of discounts on certain notes receivable from
unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Transactions that
result in accretion occur infrequently and thus accretion income
may vary from period to period.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, interest income decreased
$10.5 million, or 51.4%. Interest income decreased by
$8.7 million due to lower interest rates on notes
receivable, cash and restricted cash balances and lower average
balances and by $4.1 million due to a decrease in accretion
income related to our note receivable from Casden Properties LLC
for which we ceased accretion following impairment of the note
in 2008. These decreases were partially offset by a
$2.3 million increase in accretion income related to other
notes during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting
from a change in the timing and amount of collection.
I-10
For the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2007, interest income decreased
$23.1 million, or 53.1%. Interest income decreased by
$15.9 million due to lower interest rates on notes
receivable, cash and restricted cash balances and lower average
balances. Interest income also decreased by $5.8 million
due to an adjustment of accretion on certain discounted notes
during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting from a
change in the estimated timing and amount of collection, and by
$1.5 million for accretion income recognized during the
year ended December 31, 2007, related to the prepayment of
principal on certain discounted loans collateralized by
properties in West Harlem in New York City.
Provision
for Losses on Notes Receivable
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized net provisions for losses on notes receivable of
$21.5 million, $17.6 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. The provisions for losses on notes receivable for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, primarily
consist of impairments related to our investment in Casden
Properties LLC, which are discussed further below.
As part of the March 2002 acquisition of Casden Properties,
Inc., we invested $50.0 million for a 20% passive interest
in Casden Properties LLC, an entity organized to acquire,
re-entitle and develop land parcels in Southern California.
Based upon the profit allocation agreement, we account for this
investment as a note receivable and through 2008 were amortizing
the discounted value of the investment to the $50.0 million
previously estimated to be collectible, through January 2,
2009, the initial dissolution date of the entity. In 2009, the
managing member extended the dissolution date. In connection
with the preparation of our 2008 annual financial statements and
as a result of a decline in land values in Southern California,
we determined our recorded investment amount was not fully
recoverable, and accordingly recognized an impairment loss of
$16.3 million ($10.0 million net of tax) during the
three months ended December 31, 2008. In connection with
the preparation of our 2009 annual financial statements and as a
result of continued declines in land values in Southern
California, we determined our then recorded investment amount
was not fully recoverable, and accordingly recognized an
impairment loss of $20.7 million ($12.4 million net of
tax) during the three months ended December 31, 2009.
In addition to the impairments related to Casden Properties LLC
discussed above, we recognized provisions for losses on notes
receivable totaling $0.8 million, $1.3 million and
$2.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Interest
Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, interest expense, which includes the amortization of
deferred financing costs, totaled $315.4 million and
$315.0 million, respectively. Interest expense increased by
$14.5 million due to a reduction in redevelopment activity
during 2009, which resulted in a reduction in capitalized
interest. In addition, interest expense increased by
$1.2 million due to an increase in prepayment penalties
associated with refinancing activities, from $2.8 million
in 2008 to $4.0 million in 2009, and by $4.0 million
related to non-recourse property loans, from $301.9 million
to $305.9 million, primarily due to higher average interest
rates partially offset by lower average balances during 2009.
These increases in interest expense were substantially offset by
decreases in corporate interest expense. Interest expense
related to corporate debt, which is primarily floating rate,
decreased by $19.4 million, from $34.8 million to
$15.4 million, primarily due to lower average balances and
interest rates during 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, interest expense increased
$10.3 million, or 3.4%. Interest expense related to
non-recourse property loans increased by $16.2 million,
from $285.7 million to $301.9 million, primarily due
to higher average balances partially offset by lower average
interest rates during 2008. In addition, interest expense
increased by $4.6 million, due to a decrease in capitalized
interest from $29.1 million in 2007 to $24.5 million
in 2008, resulting from more units in service and lower interest
rates. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
interest expense related to corporate debt, which is primarily
floating rate and which decreased by $10.4 million, from
$45.2 million to $34.8 million, primarily due to lower
average balances and interest rates during 2008.
Equity
in Losses of Unconsolidated Real Estate
Partnerships
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships
includes our share of net losses of our unconsolidated real
estate partnerships and is primarily driven by depreciation
expense in excess of the net operating income recognized by such
partnerships.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate
partnerships of $12.0 million, $4.6 million and
$3.3 million, respectively. The $7.4 million increase
in our equity in losses from 2008 to 2009 was primarily due to
our sale in late 2008 of an interest in an unconsolidated real
estate
I-11
partnership that generated $3.0 million of equity in
earnings during the year ended December 31, 2008, and our
sale during 2009 of our interest in an unconsolidated group
purchasing organization which resulted in a decrease of equity
in earnings of approximately $1.2 million. The increase in
equity in losses also includes additional losses recognized
during 2009 related to the underlying investment properties of
certain tax credit syndications we consolidated during 2009 and
2008.
Impairment
Losses Related to Unconsolidated Real Estate
Partnerships
Impairment losses related to unconsolidated real estate
partnerships includes our share of impairment losses recognized
by our unconsolidated real estate partnerships. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008, impairment losses related to
unconsolidated real estate partnerships decreased
$2.3 million, and for the year ended December 31,
2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007,
impairment losses related to unconsolidated real estate
partnerships increased $2.7 million. This decrease and
increase are primarily attributable to impairment losses
recognized by unconsolidated partnerships on their underlying
real estate properties during 2008.
Gain
on Dispositions of Unconsolidated Real Estate and
Other
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
includes our share of gains related to dispositions of real
estate by unconsolidated real estate partnerships, gains on
disposition of interests in unconsolidated real estate
partnerships, gains on dispositions of land and other
non-depreciable assets and costs related to asset disposal
activities. Changes in the level of gains recognized from period
to period reflect the changing level of disposition activity
from period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold
are determined on an individual property basis or in the
aggregate for a group of properties that are sold in a single
transaction, and are not comparable period to period.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, gain on dispositions of
unconsolidated real estate and other decreased
$77.4 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to a
gain of $98.4 million on our disposition in 2008 of
interests in two unconsolidated real estate partnerships. This
decrease was partially offset by $18.7 million of gains on
the disposition of interests in unconsolidated partnerships
during 2009. Gains recognized in 2009 consist of
$8.6 million related to our receipt in 2009 of additional
proceeds related to our disposition during 2008 of one of the
partnership interests discussed above (see Note 3 to the
consolidated financials statements in Item 8),
$4.0 million from the disposition of our interest in a
group purchasing organization (see Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8), and
$6.1 million from our disposition in 2009 of interests in
unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, gain on dispositions of
unconsolidated real estate and other increased
$76.5 million. This increase is primarily attributable to a
$98.4 million net gain on the disposition of interests in
two unconsolidated real estate partnerships during the year
ended December 31, 2008. During 2007, we recognized a
$6.0 million non-refundable option and extension fee
resulting from the termination of rights under an option
agreement to sell the North and Central towers of our Flamingo
South Beach property, approximately $6.4 million of net
gains on dispositions of land parcels and our share of gains on
dispositions of properties by unconsolidated real estate
partnerships in 2007, and a $9.5 million gain on debt
extinguishment related to properties in the VMS partnership (see
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8).
Income
Tax Benefit
In conjunction with Aimcos UPREIT structure, certain of
our operations, or a portion thereof, such as property
management, asset management and risk management, are conducted
through, and certain of our properties are owned by, taxable
subsidiaries. Income taxes related to the results of continuing
operations of our taxable subsidiaries are included in income
tax benefit in our consolidated statements of income.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, income tax benefit decreased by
$34.5 million. This decrease was primarily attributed to
$36.1 million of income tax benefit recognized in 2008
related to the impairments of our Lincoln Place property and our
investment in Casden Properties LLC, both of which are owned
through taxable subsidiaries, partially offset by
$8.1 million of income tax benefit recognized in 2009
related to the impairment of our investment in Casden Properties
LLC.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, income tax benefit increased by
$33.4 million. This increase was primarily attributed to
$36.1 million of income tax benefit recognized in 2008
related to the impairments of our Lincoln Place property and our
investment in Casden Properties LLC.
I-12
Income
from Discontinued Operations, Net
The results of operations for properties sold during the period
or designated as held for sale at the end of the period are
generally required to be classified as discontinued operations
for all periods presented. The components of net earnings that
are classified as discontinued operations include all
property-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation
expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale,
property-specific interest expense and debt extinguishment gains
and losses to the extent there is secured debt on the property.
In addition, any impairment losses on assets held for sale and
the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of properties held
for sale are reported in discontinued operations.
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, income from
discontinued operations totaled $153.9 million and
$746.2 million, respectively. The $592.3 million
decrease in income from discontinued operations was principally
due to a $541.2 million decrease in gain on dispositions of
real estate, net of income taxes, primarily attributable to
fewer properties sold in 2009 as compared to 2008, and a
$111.8 million decrease in operating income (inclusive of a
$27.1 million increase in real estate impairment losses),
partially offset by a $59.1 million decrease in interest
expense.
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, income from
discontinued operations totaled $746.2 million and
$175.6 million, respectively. The $570.6 million
increase in income from discontinued operations was principally
due to a $641.7 million increase in gain on dispositions of
real estate, net of income taxes, primarily attributable to more
properties sold in 2008 as compared to 2007 and a
$27.1 million decrease in interest expense. These increases
were partially offset by a $66.7 million decrease in
operating income (inclusive of a $22.0 million increase in
real estate impairment losses) and a $32.7 million decrease
related to a 2007 gain on debt extinguishment related to
properties in the VMS partnership.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we sold 89
consolidated properties for gross proceeds of $1.3 billion
and net proceeds of $432.7 million, resulting in a net gain
on sale of approximately $216.0 million (which is net of
$5.8 million of related income taxes). During the year
ended December 31, 2008, we sold 151 consolidated
properties for gross proceeds of $2.4 billion and net
proceeds of $1.1 billion, resulting in a net gain on sale
of approximately $757.2 million (which is net of
$43.1 million of related income taxes). During the year
ended December 31, 2007, we sold 73 consolidated properties
for gross proceeds of $480.0 million and net proceeds of
$203.8 million, resulting in a net gain on sale of
approximately $115.5 million (which is net of
$2.1 million of related income taxes).
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
income from discontinued operations includes the operating
results of the properties sold or classified as held for sale as
of September 30, 2010.
Changes in the level of gains recognized from period to period
reflect the changing level of our disposition activity from
period to period. Additionally, gains on properties sold are
determined on an individual property basis or in the aggregate
for a group of properties that are sold in a single transaction,
and are not comparable period to period (see Note 13 of the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for additional
information on discontinued operations).
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships reflects the non-Aimco partners, or
noncontrolling partners, share of operating results of
consolidated real estate partnerships. This generally includes
the noncontrolling partners share of property management
fees, interest on notes and other amounts eliminated in
consolidation that we charge to such partnerships. As discussed
in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 160, which
are now codified in the Financial Accounting Standards
Boards Accounting Standards Codification, or FASB ASC,
Topic 810, effective January 1, 2009. Prior to our adoption
of SFAS 160, we generally did not recognize a benefit for
the noncontrolling interest partners share of partnership
losses for partnerships that have deficit noncontrolling
interest balances and we generally recognized a charge to our
earnings for distributions paid to noncontrolling partners for
partnerships that had deficit noncontrolling interest balances.
Under the updated provisions of FASB ASC Topic 810, we are
required to attribute losses to noncontrolling interests even if
such attribution would result in a deficit noncontrolling
interest balance and we are no longer required to recognize a
charge to our earnings for distributions paid to noncontrolling
partners for partnerships that have deficit noncontrolling
interest balances.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, net earnings attributed to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships decreased by $133.3 million. This decrease is
primarily attributable to a reduction of $108.7 million
related to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated real
estate partnerships share of gains on dispositions of real
estate, due primarily to fewer sales in 2009 as compared to
2008, $5.5 million of losses allocated to noncontrolling
interests in 2009 that we would not have allocated to the
noncontrolling interest partners in 2008 because to do so would
have resulted in deficits in their noncontrolling interest
balances, and approximately $3.8 million related to deficit
distribution charges recognized as a reduction to our earnings
in 2008, for which we did not recognize similar charges in 2009
based on the change in accounting discussed above. These
decreases are in addition to
I-13
the noncontrolling interest partners share of increased
losses of our consolidated real estate partnerships in 2009 as
compared to 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007, net income attributed to
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships increased by $63.6 million. This increase is
primarily attributable to an increase of $105.6 million
related to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated real
estate partnerships share of gains on dispositions of real
estate, due primarily to more sales in 2008 as compared to 2007,
partially offset by increases of $42.0 million in net
recoveries of deficit distributions.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8, during the first quarter 2010, we
will adopt new accounting guidance related to accounting for
variable interest entities. This change in accounting guidance
may result in our consolidation of certain previously
unconsolidated entities as well as our deconsolidation of
certain we currently consolidate. At this time, we have not yet
determined the effect this accounting change will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, or GAAP, which requires us to make estimates
and assumptions. We believe that the following critical
accounting policies involve our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Real estate and other long-lived assets to be held and used are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization,
unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize
an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property.
From time to time, we have non-revenue producing properties that
we hold for future redevelopment. We assess the recoverability
of the carrying amount of these redevelopment properties by
comparing our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows based
on the expected service potential of the redevelopment property
upon completion to the carrying amount. In certain instances, we
use a probability-weighted approach to determine our estimate of
undiscounted future cash flows when alternative courses of
action are under consideration. As discussed in Provision for
Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development Assets within
the preceding discussion of our Results of Operations, during
2008 we recognized impairment losses on our Lincoln Place and
Pacific Bay Vistas properties of $85.4 million
($55.6 million net of tax) and $5.7 million,
respectively.
Real estate investments are subject to varying degrees of risk.
Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance
and value of our real estate investments. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the general economic climate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
competition from other apartment communities and other housing
options;
|
|
|
|
|
|
local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the
supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment
occupancy or rental rates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of
compliance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due
to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by
increased rents;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of
rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily
housing; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.
|
Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an
impairment in our long-lived assets, including real estate and
investments in unconsolidated real estate partnerships. In
addition to the impairments of Lincoln Place and Pacific Bay
Vistas discussed above, based on periodic tests of
recoverability of long-lived assets, for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2007, we recorded net impairment
losses of $2.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively,
related to properties classified as held for use, and during the
year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded no additional
impairments related to properties held for use.
I-14
Notes
Receivable and Interest Income Recognition
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships
consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which
we are the general partner. Notes receivable from non-affiliates
consist of notes receivable from unrelated third parties. The
ultimate repayment of these notes is subject to a number of
variables, including the performance and value of the underlying
real estate and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders. Our
notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry at
the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as
par value notes, and loans extended by predecessors,
some of whose positions we generally acquired at a discount,
which we refer to as discounted notes.
We record interest income on par value notes as earned in
accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We
discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes
are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise
significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We
record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost recovery
method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the recorded
amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts are
recognized as income.
We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable
based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both
probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be
probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has closed
transactions or has entered into certain pending transactions
(which include real estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and
rights offerings) that provide a reliable source of repayment.
In such instances, we recognize accretion income, on a
prospective basis using the effective interest method over the
estimated remaining term of the loans, equal to the difference
between the carrying amount of the discounted notes and the
estimated collectible value. We record income on all other
discounted notes using the cost recovery method. Accretion
income recognized in any given period is based on our ability to
complete transactions to monetize the notes receivable and the
difference between the carrying value and the estimated
collectible amount of the notes; therefore, accretion income
varies on a period by period basis and could be lower or higher
than in prior periods.
Provision
for Losses on Notes Receivable
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic
basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of
cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether
estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and
interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note.
We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable
that principal and interest will not be received in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the
impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value
of the partnerships real estate that represents the
primary source of loan repayment. In certain instances where
other sources of cash flow are available to repay the loan, the
impairment is measured by discounting the estimated cash flows
at the loans original effective interest rate.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we
recorded net provisions for losses on notes receivable of
$21.5 million, $17.6 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. As discussed in Provision for Losses on Notes
Receivable within the preceding discussion of our Results of
Operations, provisions for losses on notes receivable in 2009
and 2008 include impairment losses of $20.7 million
($12.4 million net of tax) and $16.3 million
($10.0 million net of tax), respectively, on our investment
in Casden Properties LLC, which we account for as a note
receivable. We will continue to evaluate the collectibility of
these notes, and we will adjust related allowances in the future
due to changes in market conditions and other factors.
Capitalized
Costs
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred
in connection with our capital additions activities, including
redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property
improvements and replacements of existing property components.
Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated
with time spent by site employees in connection with the
planning, execution and control of all capital additions
activities at the property level. We characterize as
indirect costs an allocation of certain department
costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate
levels that clearly relate to capital additions activities. We
capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods
in which redevelopment and construction projects are in
progress. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not
relate to capital additions activities, including ordinary
repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and
administrative expenses (see Capital Additions and Related
Depreciation in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 8).
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, for
continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized
$9.8 million, $25.7 million and $30.8 million of
interest costs, respectively, and $40.0 million,
$78.1 million and $78.1 million of site payroll and
indirect costs, respectively. The reduction is primarily due to
a reduced level of redevelopment activities.
I-15
Funds
From Operations
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe, when
considered with the financial statements determined in
accordance with GAAP, is helpful to investors in understanding
our performance because it captures features particular to real
estate performance by recognizing that real estate generally
appreciates over time or maintains residual value to a much
greater extent than do other depreciable assets such as
machinery, computers or other personal property. The Board of
Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as net income (loss), computed in
accordance with GAAP, excluding gains from sales of depreciable
property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures
are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We compute FFO
for all periods presented in accordance with the guidance set
forth by NAREITs April 1, 2002, White Paper, which we
refer to as the White Paper. We calculate FFO attributable to
the Partnerships common unitholders (diluted) by
subtracting redemption or repurchase related preferred
OP Unit issuance costs and distributions on preferred
OP Units and adding back distributions on dilutive
preferred securities and premiums or discounts on preferred
OP Unit redemptions or repurchases. FFO should not be
considered an alternative to net income or net cash flows from
operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, as
an indication of our performance or as a measure of liquidity.
FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund
future cash needs. In addition, although FFO is a measure used
for comparability in assessing the performance of REITs, there
can be no assurance that our basis for computing FFO is
comparable with that of other REITs.
I-16
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, our
FFO is calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships
common unitholders(1)
|
|
$
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
403,700
|
|
|
$
|
(43,508
|
)
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
433,933
|
|
|
|
383,084
|
|
|
|
337,804
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to non-real estate assets
|
|
|
(16,597
|
)
|
|
|
(17,305
|
)
|
|
|
(20,108
|
)
|
Depreciation of rental property related to noncontrolling
partners and unconsolidated entities(2)
|
|
|
(39,278
|
)
|
|
|
(26,695
|
)
|
|
|
(13,167
|
)
|
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other,
net of noncontrolling partners interest
|
|
|
(20,615
|
)
|
|
|
(99,597
|
)
|
|
|
(22,252
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit) arising from disposition of
unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Add back portion of gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real
estate and other that relates to non-depreciable assets and debt
extinguishment gain
|
|
|
7,783
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
16,851
|
|
Deficit distributions to noncontrolling partners(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,640
|
|
|
|
26,641
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on dispositions of real estate, net of noncontrolling
partners interest(2)
|
|
|
(166,159
|
)
|
|
|
(618,173
|
)
|
|
|
(65,035
|
)
|
Depreciation of rental property, net of noncontrolling
partners interest(2)
|
|
|
54,671
|
|
|
|
115,714
|
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
(Recovery of deficit distributions) deficit distributions to
noncontrolling partners, net(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,783
|
)
|
|
|
12,119
|
|
Income tax expense arising from disposals
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
43,146
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Preferred OP Unit distributions
|
|
|
58,503
|
|
|
|
62,836
|
|
|
|
70,509
|
|
Preferred OP Unit redemption related (gains) costs
|
|
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
2,635
|
|
Amounts allocable to participating securities(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO
|
|
$
|
194,686
|
|
|
$
|
249,306
|
|
|
$
|
430,588
|
|
Preferred OP Unit distributions
|
|
|
(58,503
|
)
|
|
|
(62,836
|
)
|
|
|
(70,509
|
)
|
Preferred OP Unit redemption related gains (costs)
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
Amounts allocable to participating securities(4)
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
(6,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
Distributions on dilutive preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders diluted
|
|
$
|
137,040
|
|
|
$
|
185,259
|
|
|
$
|
354,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common units, common unit
equivalents and dilutive preferred securities outstanding(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units and equivalents(6)(7)
|
|
|
124,442
|
|
|
|
99,386
|
|
|
|
106,802
|
|
Dilutive preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
124,442
|
|
|
|
100,876
|
|
|
|
107,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the numerator for calculating basic earnings per
common unit in accordance with GAAP (see Note 14 to
the consolidated financial statements in Item 8). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Noncontrolling partners refers to noncontrolling
partners in our consolidated real estate partnerships. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Prior to adoption of SFAS 160 (see Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8), we recognized
deficit distributions to noncontrolling partners as charges in
our income statement when cash was distributed to a
noncontrolling partner in a consolidated partnership in excess
of the positive balance in such partners noncontrolling
interest balance. We recorded these charges for GAAP purposes
even though there was no economic effect or cost. Deficit
distributions to noncontrolling partners occurred when the fair
value of the underlying real estate exceeded its depreciated net
book value because the underlying real estate had appreciated or
maintained its value. As a result, the recognition of expense
for deficit distributions to noncontrolling partners
represented, in substance, either (a) our recognition of
depreciation previously allocated to the noncontrolling partner
or (b) a payment related to the noncontrolling
partners share of real estate appreciation. Based on White
Paper guidance that requires real estate |
I-17
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation and gains to be excluded from FFO, we added back
deficit distributions and subtracted related recoveries in our
reconciliation of net income to FFO. Subsequent to our adoption
of SFAS 160, effective January 1, 2009, we may reduce
the balance of noncontrolling interests below zero in such
situations and we are no longer required to recognize such
charges in our income statement. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Amounts allocable to participating securities represent
distributions declared and any amounts of undistributed earnings
allocable to participating securities. See Note 2 and
Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 for further information regarding participating
securities. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Weighted average common units, common unit equivalents, dilutive
preferred securities for each of the periods presented above
have been adjusted for our application during the fourth quarter
2009 of a change in GAAP, which requires the common OP units
issued to Aimco in connection with our special distributions
paid in 2008 and January 2009 to be treated as issued and
outstanding on the distribution payment dates for basic purposes
and as potential unit equivalents for the periods between the
ex-dividend dates and the payment dates for diluted purposes,
rather than treating the units as issued and outstanding as of
the beginning of the earliest period presented for both basic
and diluted purposes. The change in accounting treatment had no
effect on diluted weighted average units outstanding for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The change in accounting
treatment reduced diluted weighted average units outstanding by
32.9 million and 46.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Represents the denominator for earnings per common
unit diluted, calculated in accordance with GAAP,
plus common OP unit equivalents that are dilutive for FFO. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
had 6,534,140, 7,191,199, and 7,367,400 common OP Units
outstanding and 2,344,719, 2,367,629 and 2,379,084 High
Performance Units outstanding. |
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial
obligations. Our primary source of liquidity is cash flow from
our operations. Additional sources are proceeds from property
sales and proceeds from refinancings of existing property loans
and borrowings under new property loans.
Our principal uses for liquidity include normal operating
activities, payments of principal and interest on outstanding
debt, capital additions, distributions paid to unitholders and
distributions paid to noncontrolling interest partners,
repurchases of common OP Units from Aimco in connection
with Aimcos concurrent repurchase of its Class A
Common Stock, and acquisitions of, and investments in,
properties. We use our cash and cash equivalents and our cash
provided by operating activities to meet short-term liquidity
needs. In the event that our cash and cash equivalents and cash
provided by operating activities are not sufficient to cover our
short-term liquidity demands, we have additional means, such as
short-term borrowing availability and proceeds from property
sales and refinancings, to help us meet our short-term liquidity
demands. We may use our revolving credit facility for general
corporate purposes and to fund investments on an interim basis.
We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as
debt maturities and property acquisitions, through long-term
borrowings, primarily secured, the issuance of equity securities
(including OP Units), the sale of properties and cash
generated from operations.
The state of credit markets and related effect on the overall
economy may have an adverse affect on our liquidity, both
through increases in interest rates and credit risk spreads, and
access to financing. As further discussed in Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, we
are subject to interest rate risk associated with certain
variable rate liabilities, preferred stock and assets. Based on
our net variable rate liabilities, preferred OP Units and
assets outstanding at December 31, 2009, we estimate that a
1.0% increase in
30-day LIBOR
with constant credit risk spreads would reduce our income
attributable to the Partnerships common unitholders by
approximately $1.6 million on an annual basis. Although
base interest rates have generally decreased relative to their
levels prior to the disruptions in the financial markets, the
tightening of credit markets has affected the credit risk
spreads charged over base interest rates on, and the
availability of, property loan financing. For future refinancing
activities, our liquidity and cost of funds may be affected by
increases in base interest rates or higher credit risk spreads.
If timely property financing options are not available for
maturing debt, we may consider alternative sources of liquidity,
such as reductions in certain capital spending or proceeds from
asset dispositions.
As further discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 8, we use total rate of return
swaps as a financing product to lower our cost of borrowing
through conversion of fixed rate tax-exempt bonds payable and
fixed rate notes payable to variable interest rates indexed to
the SIFMA rate for tax-exempt bonds payable and the
30-day LIBOR
rate for notes payable, plus a credit risk spread. The cost of
financing through these arrangements is generally lower than the
fixed rate on the debt. As of December 31, 2009, we had
total rate of return swap positions with two financial
institutions with notional amounts totaling $353.1 million.
Swaps with notional amounts of $307.9 million and
$45.2 million had maturity dates in May 2012 and October
2012, respectively.
I-18
The total rate of return swaps require specified
loan-to-value
ratios. In the event the values of the real estate properties
serving as collateral under these agreements decline or if we
sell properties in the collateral pool with low
loan-to-value
ratios, certain of our consolidated subsidiaries have an
obligation to pay down the debt or provide additional collateral
pursuant to the swap agreements, which may adversely affect our
cash flows. The obligation to provide collateral is limited to
these subsidiaries and is non-recourse to us. At
December 31, 2009, these subsidiaries were not required to
provide cash collateral based on the
loan-to-value
ratios of the real estate properties serving as collateral under
these agreements.
We periodically evaluate counterparty credit risk associated
with these arrangements. At the current time, we have concluded
we do not have material exposure. In the event a counterparty
were to default under these arrangements, loss of the net
interest benefit we generally receive under these arrangements,
which is equal to the difference between the fixed rate we
receive and the variable rate we pay, may adversely affect our
operating cash flows.
See Derivative Financial Instruments in Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for
additional discussion of these arrangements, including the
current swap maturity dates.
As of December 31, 2009, the amount available under our
$180.0 million revolving credit facility was
$136.2 million (after giving effect to $43.8 million
outstanding for undrawn letters of credit). Our total
outstanding term loan of $90.0 million at December 31,
2009, matures in March 2011. We repaid an additional
$45.0 million on the term loan through February 26,
2010, leaving a remaining outstanding balance of
$45.0 million. Additionally, we have limited obligations to
fund redevelopment commitments during the year ending
December 31, 2010, and no development commitments.
At December 31, 2009, we had $81.3 million in cash and
cash equivalents, a decrease of $218.4 million from
December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, we had
$219.0 million of restricted cash, primarily consisting of
reserves and escrows held by lenders for bond sinking funds,
capital additions, property taxes and insurance. In addition,
cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are held by
partnerships that are not presented on a consolidated basis. The
following discussion relates to changes in cash due to
operating, investing and financing activities, which are
presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows in
Item 8.
Operating
Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash provided
by operating activities of $233.8 million was primarily
related to operating income from our consolidated properties,
which is affected primarily by rental rates, occupancy levels
and operating expenses related to our portfolio of properties,
in excess of payments of operating accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, including amounts related to our organizational
restructuring. Cash provided by operating activities decreased
$206.6 million compared with the year ended
December 31, 2008, primarily due to a $159.3 million
decrease in operating income related to consolidated properties
included in discontinued operations, which was attributable to
property sales in 2009 and 2008, a $42.8 million decrease
in promote income, which is generated by the disposition of
properties by consolidated real estate partnerships, and an
increase in payments on operating accounts payable and accrued
expenses, including payments related to our restructuring
accrual, in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Investing
Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash provided
by investing activities of $630.7 million consisted
primarily of proceeds from disposition of real estate and
partnership interests, partially offset by capital expenditures.
Although we hold all of our properties for investment, we sell
properties when they do not meet our investment criteria or are
located in areas that we believe do not justify our continued
investment when compared to alternative uses for our capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we sold 89
consolidated properties. These properties were sold for an
aggregate sales price of $1.3 billion, or
$1.2 billion, after the payment of transaction costs and
debt prepayment penalties. The $1.2 billion is inclusive of
promote income and debt assumed by buyers. Net cash proceeds
from property sales were used primarily to repay term debt and
for other corporate purposes.
Capital
Additions
We classify all capital additions as Capital Replacements (which
we refer to as CR), Capital Improvements (which we refer to as
CI), casualties or redevelopment. Additions other than casualty
or redevelopment capital additions are apportioned between CR
and CI based on the useful life of the capital item under
consideration and the period we have owned the property.
CR represents the share of capital additions that are deemed to
replace the portion of acquired capital assets that was consumed
during the period we have owned the asset. CI represents the
share of additions that are made to enhance the
I-19
value, profitability or useful life of an asset as compared to
its original purchase condition. CR and CI exclude capital
additions for casualties and redevelopment. Casualty additions
represent capitalized costs incurred in connection with casualty
losses and are associated with the restoration of the asset. A
portion of the restoration costs may be reimbursed by insurance
carriers subject to deductibles associated with each loss.
Redevelopment additions represent additions that substantially
upgrade the property.
The table below details our share of actual spending, on both
consolidated and unconsolidated real estate partnerships, for
CR, CI, casualties and redevelopment for the year ended
December 31, 2009, on a per unit and total dollar basis (in
thousands, except per unit amounts). Per unit numbers for CR and
CI are based on approximately 97,196 average units for the year,
including 81,135 conventional units and 16,061 affordable units.
Average units are weighted for the portion of the period that we
owned an interest in the property, represent ownership-adjusted
effective units, and exclude non-managed units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
Our Share of
|
|
|
Effective
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
Capital Replacements Detail:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building and grounds
|
|
$
|
32,876
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
Turnover related
|
|
|
30,298
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Capitalized site payroll and indirect costs
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of Capital Replacements
|
|
$
|
70,250
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Replacements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
$
|
64,675
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of Capital Replacements
|
|
|
70,250
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Improvements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
47,634
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
5,755
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of Capital Improvements
|
|
|
53,389
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
17,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of casualties
|
|
|
19,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional projects
|
|
|
66,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit projects(1)
|
|
|
46,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of redevelopment
|
|
|
112,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital additions
|
|
|
256,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus noncontrolling partners share of consolidated
additions
|
|
|
20,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less our share of unconsolidated additions
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital additions
|
|
$
|
275,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Redevelopment additions on tax credit projects are substantially
funded from tax credit investor contributions. |
Included in the above additions for CI, casualties and
redevelopment, was approximately $34.6 million of our share
of capitalized site payroll and indirect costs related to these
activities for the year ended December 31, 2009.
We generally fund capital additions with cash provided by
operating activities, working capital and property sales as
discussed below.
I-20
Financing
Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash used in
financing activities of $1.1 billion was primarily
attributed to debt principal payments, distributions paid to
common and preferred unitholders and distributions to
noncontrolling interests, partially offset by proceeds from
property loans.
Property
Debt
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $5.6 billion and
$6.3 billion, respectively, in consolidated property debt
outstanding, which included $178.3 million and
$909.4 million, respectively, of property debt classified
within liabilities related to assets held for sale. During the
year ended December 31, 2009, we refinanced or closed
property loans on 55 properties generating $788.1 million
of proceeds from borrowings with a weighted average interest
rate of 5.78%. Our share of the net proceeds after repayment of
existing debt, payment of transaction costs and distributions to
limited partners, was $132.3 million. We used these total
net proceeds for capital expenditures and other corporate
purposes. We intend to continue to refinance property debt
primarily as a means of extending current and near term
maturities and to finance certain capital projects.
Term
Loans and Credit Facility
We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement,
as amended, with a syndicate of financial institutions, which we
refer to as the Credit Agreement.
As of December 31, 2009, the Credit Agreement consisted of
aggregate commitments of $270.0 million, comprised of our
$90.0 million outstanding balance on the term loan and
$180.0 million of revolving loan commitments. The term loan
bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%, or at our option, a base rate
equal to the prime rate, and matures March 2011. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a
pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 4.25%
with a LIBOR floor of 2.00% or, at our option, a base rate equal
to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.00%). The revolving credit
facility matures May 1, 2011, and may be extended for an
additional year, subject to certain conditions, including
payment of a 45.0 basis point fee on the total revolving
commitments and repayment of the remaining term loan balance by
February 1, 2011.
At December 31, 2009, the term loan had an outstanding
principal balance of $90.0 million and an interest rate of
1.73%. We repaid $45.0 million on the term loan through
February 26, 2010, leaving a remaining outstanding balance
of $45.0 million. At December 31, 2009, we had no
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The
amount available under the revolving credit facility at
December 31, 2009, was $136.2 million (after giving
effect to $43.8 million outstanding for undrawn letters of
credit issued under the revolving credit facility). The proceeds
of revolving loans are generally permitted to be used to fund
working capital and for other corporate purposes.
Fair
Value Measurements
We have entered into total rate of return swaps on various fixed
rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed rate notes
payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a
variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to
lower our cost of borrowing. We designate total rate of return
swaps as hedges of the risk of overall changes in the fair value
of the underlying borrowings. At each reporting period, we
estimate the fair value of these borrowings and the total rate
of return swaps and recognize any changes therein as an
adjustment of interest expense.
Our method used to calculate the fair value of the total rate of
return swaps generally results in changes in fair value that are
equal to the changes in fair value of the related borrowings,
which is consistent with our hedging strategy. We believe that
these financial instruments are highly effective in offsetting
the changes in fair value of the related borrowings during the
hedging period, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of
these instruments have no material impact on our liquidity,
results of operations or capital resources.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, changes in the
fair values of these financial instruments resulted in increases
of $5.2 million in the carrying amount of the hedged
borrowings and equal decreases in accrued liabilities and other
for total rate of return swaps. At December 31, 2009, the
cumulative recognized changes in the fair value of these
financial instruments resulted in a $24.3 million reduction
in the carrying amount of the hedged borrowings offset by an
equal increase in accrued liabilities and other for total rate
of return swaps. The cumulative changes in the fair values of
the hedged borrowings and related swaps reflect the recent
uncertainty in the credit markets which has decreased demand and
increased pricing for similar debt instruments.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we received net
cash receipts of $19.4 million under the total return
swaps, which positively affected our liquidity. To the extent
interest rates increase above the fixed rates on the underlying
borrowings, our obligations under the total return swaps will
negatively affect our liquidity. At December 31, 2009, we
were
I-21
not required to provide cash collateral pursuant to the total
rate of return swaps. In the event the values of the real estate
properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline,
we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to
the swap agreements, which would adversely affect our liquidity.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8 for more information on our total rate of return
swaps and related borrowings.
Partners
Capital Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we paid cash
distributions totaling $59.2 million, $116.8 million
and $92.4 million to preferred unitholders, common
unitholders and noncontrolling interests, respectively.
Additionally, we paid distributions totaling $149.0 million
to Aimco through the issuance of approximately 15.5 million
common OP units.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, Aimco repurchased
12 shares, or $6.0 million in liquidation preference,
of its CRA Preferred Stock for $4.2 million. Concurrent
with Aimcos repurchase, we repurchased from Aimco an
equivalent number of our CRA Preferred Units.
We and Aimco have a shelf registration statement that provides
for the issuance of debt securities by us and debt and equity
securities by Aimco.
Contractual
Obligations
This table summarizes information contained elsewhere in this
Annual Report regarding payments due under contractual
obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2009
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Scheduled long-term debt maturities(1)
|
|
$
|
5,451,148
|
|
|
$
|
100,958
|
|
|
$
|
651,166
|
|
|
$
|
843,747
|
|
|
$
|
3,855,277
|
|
Scheduled long-term debt maturities related to properties
classified as held for sale(1)
|
|
|
178,339
|
|
|
|
4,855
|
|
|
|
20,773
|
|
|
|
25,736
|
|
|
|
126,975
|
|
Term loan(1)(2)
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redevelopment and other construction commitments
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases for space occupied(3)
|
|
|
24,888
|
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
|
10,856
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
Other obligations(4)
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,753,775
|
|
|
$
|
122,558
|
|
|
$
|
772,795
|
|
|
$
|
874,342
|
|
|
$
|
3,984,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Scheduled debt maturities presented above include amortization
and the maturities in 2010 consist primarily of amortization.
The scheduled maturities presented above exclude related
interest amounts. Refer to Note 6 in the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 for a description of average
interest rates associated with our debt. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
After payments of $45.0 million through February 26,
2010, the term loan had an outstanding balance of
$45.0 million. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Inclusive of leased space that has been abandoned as part of our
organizational restructuring in 2008 (see Restructuring Costs
in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in
Item 8). |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents a commitment to fund $4.6 million in second
mortgage loans on certain properties in West Harlem, New York
City. |
In addition to the amounts presented in the table above, at
December 31, 2009, we had $690.5 million of
outstanding preferred units outstanding with annual dividend
yields ranging from 1.5% (variable) to 9.4%, and
$85.7 million of redeemable preferred units outstanding
with annual distribution yields ranging from 5.9% to 9.5%.
Additionally, we may enter into commitments to purchase goods
and services in connection with the operations of our
properties. Those commitments generally have terms of one year
or less and reflect expenditure levels comparable to our
historical expenditures.
Future
Capital Needs
In addition to the items set forth in Contractual
Obligations above, we expect to fund any future
acquisitions, additional redevelopment projects, capital
improvements and capital replacement principally with proceeds
from property sales (including tax-free exchange proceeds),
short-term borrowings, debt and equity financing (including tax
credit equity) and operating cash flows.
I-22
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We own general and limited partner interests in unconsolidated
real estate partnerships, in which our total ownership interests
typically range from less than 1% to 50% and in some instances
may exceed 50%. There are no lines of credit, side agreements,
or any other derivative financial instruments related to or
between our unconsolidated real estate partnerships and us and
no material exposure to financial guarantees. Accordingly, our
maximum risk of loss related to these unconsolidated real estate
partnerships is limited to the aggregate carrying amount of our
investment in the unconsolidated real estate partnerships and
any outstanding notes receivable as reported in our consolidated
financial statements (see Note 4 of the consolidated
financial statements in Item 8 for additional information
about our investments in unconsolidated real estate
partnerships).
I-23
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I-25
|
|
|
|
|
I-26
|
|
|
|
|
I-27
|
|
|
|
|
I-28
|
|
|
|
|
I-29
|
|
|
|
|
I-30
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I-75
|
|
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or the required information is shown in the financial statements
or notes thereto.
I-24
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Partners
AIMCO Properties, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
AIMCO Properties, L.P. (the Partnership) as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, partners capital and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the accompanying Index to Financial Statements. These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the
Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion,
the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
The consolidated financial statements include retroactive
adjustments to reflect the adoption in 2009 of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment to
ARB 51 (codified in FASB ASC 810), Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business
Combinations a replacement of FASB Statement No 141
(codified in FASB ASC 805), FASB Staff Position
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (codified
in FASB ASC 260), and FASB Accounting Standards
Update
No. 2010-01,
Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of
Stock and Cash (codified in FASB ASC 505). Further, as
discussed in Notes 13 and 17, the Partnership
retrospectively adjusted the consolidated financial statements
to reflect real estate assets that meet the definition of a
component and have been sold or meet the criteria to be
classified as held for sale at December 31, 2009 pursuant
to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (codified in FASB ASC 360), through
September 30, 2010, and to reflect changes in its
reportable segments. As discussed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, the consolidated statement of
income for the year ended December 31, 2008 has been
restated to reclassify provisions for impairment losses on real
estate development assets into operating income.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Partnerships internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 26, 2010 (which is
not included herein) expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2010, except for Note 17, as to which the
date is September 10, 2010,
and Note 13, as to which the date is November 19, 2010
I-25
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
$
|
7,242,051
|
|
|
$
|
7,047,744
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,148,389
|
|
|
|
2,132,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
9,390,440
|
|
|
|
9,179,873
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(2,594,544
|
)
|
|
|
(2,222,737
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate
|
|
|
6,795,896
|
|
|
|
6,957,136
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
81,260
|
|
|
|
299,676
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
218,981
|
|
|
|
252,199
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
59,822
|
|
|
|
90,318
|
|
Accounts receivable from affiliates, net
|
|
|
23,744
|
|
|
|
38,978
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
50,807
|
|
|
|
49,947
|
|
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships,
net
|
|
|
14,295
|
|
|
|
22,567
|
|
Notes receivable from non-affiliates, net
|
|
|
125,269
|
|
|
|
139,897
|
|
Notes receivable from Aimco
|
|
|
16,371
|
|
|
|
15,551
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
104,193
|
|
|
|
117,905
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
185,816
|
|
|
|
198,639
|
|
Deferred income tax assets, net
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
28,326
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
203,670
|
|
|
|
1,245,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
$
|
9,456,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
Property tax-exempt bond financing
|
|
$
|
574,926
|
|
|
$
|
629,499
|
|
Property loans payable
|
|
|
4,823,165
|
|
|
|
4,794,291
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
53,057
|
|
|
|
95,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness
|
|
|
5,541,148
|
|
|
|
5,919,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
29,819
|
|
|
|
64,241
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
286,326
|
|
|
|
569,997
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
179,433
|
|
|
|
192,368
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
34,491
|
|
|
|
35,920
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
|
|
183,892
|
|
|
|
924,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,255,109
|
|
|
|
7,706,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred units (Note 11)
|
|
|
116,656
|
|
|
|
88,148
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred units
|
|
|
660,500
|
|
|
|
696,500
|
|
General Partner and Special Limited Partner
|
|
|
521,692
|
|
|
|
543,238
|
|
Limited Partners
|
|
|
95,990
|
|
|
|
82,461
|
|
High Performance Units
|
|
|
(40,313
|
)
|
|
|
(37,263
|
)
|
Investment in Aimco Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
|
(5,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital attributable to the Partnership
|
|
|
1,233,248
|
|
|
|
1,279,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
317,126
|
|
|
|
381,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
1,550,374
|
|
|
|
1,661,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital
|
|
$
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
$
|
9,456,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
I-26
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
(As restated see Note 2)
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
$
|
1,101,883
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,593
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,354
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
49,853
|
|
|
|
98,830
|
|
|
|
73,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,151,736
|
|
|
|
1,199,423
|
|
|
|
1,132,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
515,748
|
|
|
|
527,216
|
|
|
|
507,403
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
24,784
|
|
|
|
20,507
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
433,933
|
|
|
|
383,084
|
|
|
|
337,804
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
Provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
56,643
|
|
|
|
80,376
|
|
|
|
72,359
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
15,721
|
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
18,917
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
11,241
|
|
|
|
22,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,051,394
|
|
|
|
1,151,459
|
|
|
|
958,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
100,342
|
|
|
|
47,964
|
|
|
|
174,039
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
20,439
|
|
|
|
43,561
|
|
Provision for losses on notes receivable, net
|
|
|
(21,549
|
)
|
|
|
(17,577
|
)
|
|
|
(2,010
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(315,416
|
)
|
|
|
(315,007
|
)
|
|
|
(304,752
|
)
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
(12,025
|
)
|
|
|
(4,601
|
)
|
|
|
(3,347
|
)
|
Impairment losses related to unconsolidated real estate
partnerships
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(2,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
22,494
|
|
|
|
99,864
|
|
|
|
23,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(216,552
|
)
|
|
|
(171,579
|
)
|
|
|
(69,143
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
18,669
|
|
|
|
53,202
|
|
|
|
19,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(197,883
|
)
|
|
|
(118,377
|
)
|
|
|
(49,348
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
153,903
|
|
|
|
746,165
|
|
|
|
175,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(43,980
|
)
|
|
|
627,788
|
|
|
|
126,255
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
(22,442
|
)
|
|
|
(155,749
|
)
|
|
|
(92,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnership
|
|
|
(66,422
|
)
|
|
|
472,039
|
|
|
|
34,117
|
|
Net income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders
|
|
|
(56,854
|
)
|
|
|
(61,354
|
)
|
|
|
(73,144
|
)
|
Net income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
403,700
|
|
|
$
|
(43,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common units outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
123,180
|
|
|
|
98,249
|
|
|
|
104,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common unit
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
I-27
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Special
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
in Aimco
|
|
Attributable
|
|
Non-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Limited
|
|
Limited
|
|
Performance
|
|
Common
|
|
to the
|
|
Controlling
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Units
|
|
Partner
|
|
Partners
|
|
Units
|
|
Stock
|
|
Partnership
|
|
Interests
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
914,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,208,866
|
|
|
$
|
439,903
|
|
|
$
|
(18,308
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,537,602
|
|
|
$
|
216,015
|
|
|
$
|
2,753,617
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
Redemption of preferred units held by Aimco
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,000
|
)
|
Common and preferred units redeemed by Limited Partners to
Special Limited Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,853
|
|
|
|
(27,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Aimco related to employee stock purchases, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
Contribution from Aimco related to stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,719
|
|
Amortization of Aimco stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,235
|
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,552
|
|
|
|
203,552
|
|
Adjustment to noncontrolling interests from VMS transactions
(Note 3) Effect on transactions with owners (VMS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,820
|
|
|
|
62,820
|
|
Adjustment to noncontrolling interests from consolidation of
entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,219
|
|
|
|
91,219
|
|
Redemption of preferred units and common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
Repurchase of common units related to Aimco common stock
repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325,822
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,462
|
)
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
73,144
|
|
|
|
(35,399
|
)
|
|
|
(2,742
|
)
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,117
|
|
|
|
92,138
|
|
|
|
126,255
|
|
Common distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(406,854
|
)
|
|
|
(31,329
|
)
|
|
|
(10,246
|
)
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
(447,506
|
)
|
|
|
(211,314
|
)
|
|
|
(658,820
|
)
|
Distributions to preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(72,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,306
|
)
|
Adjustment to reflect Limited Partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,083
|
|
|
|
(125,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
815,053
|
|
|
|
664,283
|
|
|
|
253,652
|
|
|
|
(28,740
|
)
|
|
|
(6,151
|
)
|
|
|
1,698,097
|
|
|
|
454,229
|
|
|
|
2,152,326
|
|
Redemption of preferred units held by Aimco
|
|
|
(27,000
|
)
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,840
|
)
|
Common units redeemed by Limited Partners to Special Limited
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
(4,182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Aimco related to employee stock purchases, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Contribution from Aimco related to stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Amortization of Aimco stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,573
|
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,854
|
|
|
|
6,854
|
|
Adjustment to noncontrolling interests from consolidation of
entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,969
|
|
|
|
14,969
|
|
Redemption of preferred units and common units
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,046
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,168
|
)
|
Repurchase of common units related to Aimco common stock
repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473,532
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
(1,763
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
61,354
|
|
|
|
370,729
|
|
|
|
30,059
|
|
|
|
9,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,039
|
|
|
|
155,749
|
|
|
|
627,788
|
|
Common units issued to Aimco pursuant to special distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,477
|
|
Common distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(675,416
|
)
|
|
|
(50,896
|
)
|
|
|
(17,662
|
)
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
(742,932
|
)
|
|
|
(249,456
|
)
|
|
|
(992,388
|
)
|
Distributions to preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(62,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,700
|
)
|
Reclassification of redeemable preferred units to temporary
capital (Note 11)
|
|
|
(88,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,148
|
)
|
Adjustment to reflect Limited Partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,118
|
|
|
|
(144,118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
696,500
|
|
|
$
|
543,238
|
|
|
$
|
82,461
|
|
|
$
|
(37,263
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,279,827
|
|
|
$
|
381,773
|
|
|
$
|
1,661,600
|
|
Redemption of preferred units held by Aimco
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
Common units redeemed by Limited Partners to Special Limited
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
(7,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Aimco stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,007
|
|
Contribution from noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
Redemption of preferred units and common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
50,566
|
|
|
|
(114,390
|
)
|
|
|
(6,539
|
)
|
|
|
(2,347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,710
|
)
|
|
|
22,442
|
|
|
|
(50,268
|
)
|
Common units issued to Aimco pursuant to special distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,746
|
|
Common distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,880
|
)
|
|
|
(1,945
|
)
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
(49,040
|
)
|
|
|
(91,904
|
)
|
|
|
(140,944
|
)
|
Distributions to preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(50,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,566
|
)
|
Reclassification of redeemable preferred units to temporary
capital (Note 11)
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
Adjustment to reflect Limited Partners capital at
redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,078
|
)
|
|
|
30,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
660,500
|
|
|
$
|
521,692
|
|
|
$
|
95,990
|
|
|
$
|
(40,313
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,233,248
|
|
|
$
|
317,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,550,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
I-28
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(43,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
627,788
|
|
|
$
|
126,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
433,933
|
|
|
|
383,084
|
|
|
|
337,804
|
|
Equity in losses of unconsolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
|
12,025
|
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
Provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
Gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other
|
|
|
(22,494
|
)
|
|
|
(99,864
|
)
|
|
|
(23,366
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(18,669
|
)
|
|
|
(53,202
|
)
|
|
|
(19,795
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
6,666
|
|
|
|
13,833
|
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs and other
|
|
|
10,845
|
|
|
|
9,950
|
|
|
|
7,916
|
|
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
|
|
14,619
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
61,634
|
|
|
|
132,463
|
|
|
|
162,134
|
|
Gain on disposition of real estate
|
|
|
(221,793
|
)
|
|
|
(800,335
|
)
|
|
|
(117,628
|
)
|
Other adjustments to income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
53,974
|
|
|
|
67,215
|
|
|
|
(25,167
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and operating liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
27,067
|
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
|
7,453
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
|
|
56,369
|
|
|
|
(10,500
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
(74,238
|
)
|
|
|
(12,139
|
)
|
|
|
14,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
277,792
|
|
|
|
(187,420
|
)
|
|
|
356,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
233,812
|
|
|
|
440,368
|
|
|
|
482,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,655
|
)
|
|
|
(201,434
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(300,344
|
)
|
|
|
(665,233
|
)
|
|
|
(689,719
|
)
|
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate
|
|
|
875,931
|
|
|
|
2,060,344
|
|
|
|
431,863
|
|
Change in funds held in escrow from tax-free exchanges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
25,863
|
|
Proceeds from sale of interests and distributions from real
estate partnerships
|
|
|
25,067
|
|
|
|
94,277
|
|
|
|
198,998
|
|
Purchases of partnership interests and other assets
|
|
|
(6,842
|
)
|
|
|
(28,121
|
)
|
|
|
(86,204
|
)
|
Originations of notes receivable
|
|
|
(5,778
|
)
|
|
|
(6,911
|
)
|
|
|
(10,812
|
)
|
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
8,929
|
|
|
|
14,370
|
|
Distributions received from Aimco
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
36,956
|
|
|
|
(6,106
|
)
|
|
|
45,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
630,742
|
|
|
|
1,345,911
|
|
|
|
(270,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from property loans
|
|
|
772,443
|
|
|
|
949,549
|
|
|
|
1,552,048
|
|
Principal repayments on property loans
|
|
|
(1,076,318
|
)
|
|
|
(1,291,543
|
)
|
|
|
(850,484
|
)
|
Proceeds from tax-exempt bond financing
|
|
|
15,727
|
|
|
|
50,100
|
|
|
|
82,350
|
|
Principal repayments on tax-exempt bond financing
|
|
|
(157,862
|
)
|
|
|
(217,361
|
)
|
|
|
(70,029
|
)
|
(Payments on) borrowings under term loans
|
|
|
(310,000
|
)
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Net repayments on revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from (payments on) other borrowings
|
|
|
(40,085
|
)
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
(8,468
|
)
|
Repurchases and redemptions of preferred units
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
(24,840
|
)
|
|
|
(102,000
|
)
|
Repurchase of common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(502,296
|
)
|
|
|
(307,382
|
)
|
Proceeds from Class A Common Stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
53,719
|
|
Payment of distributions to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(92,421
|
)
|
|
|
(248,537
|
)
|
|
|
(168,499
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to General Partner and Special Limited
Partner
|
|
|
(95,823
|
)
|
|
|
(213,328
|
)
|
|
|
(231,729
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to Limited Partners
|
|
|
(15,403
|
)
|
|
|
(55,770
|
)
|
|
|
(16,760
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to High Performance Units
|
|
|
(5,580
|
)
|
|
|
(18,757
|
)
|
|
|
(5,710
|
)
|
Payment of distributions to preferred units
|
|
|
(59,172
|
)
|
|
|
(62,733
|
)
|
|
|
(74,221
|
)
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(14,276
|
)
|
|
|
(8,396
|
)
|
|
|
(19,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,082,970
|
)
|
|
|
(1,697,064
|
)
|
|
|
(231,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(218,416
|
)
|
|
|
89,215
|
|
|
|
(19,363
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
299,676
|
|
|
|
210,461
|
|
|
|
229,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
81,260
|
|
|
$
|
299,676
|
|
|
$
|
210,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
348,341
|
|
|
$
|
434,645
|
|
|
$
|
452,324
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
13,780
|
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
Non-cash transactions associated with the acquisition of real
estate and interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt assumed in connection with purchase of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Issuance of OP Units for interests in unconsolidated real estate
partnerships and acquisitions of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
Non-cash transactions associated with the disposition of real
estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt assumed in connection with the disposition of real
estate
|
|
|
314,265
|
|
|
|
157,394
|
|
|
|
27,929
|
|
Issuance of notes receivable connection with the disposition of
real estate
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
10,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions associated with consolidation of real
estate partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net
|
|
|
6,058
|
|
|
|
25,830
|
|
|
|
56,877
|
|
Investments in and notes receivable primarily from affiliated
entities
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
|
4,497
|
|
|
|
84,545
|
|
Restricted cash and other assets
|
|
|
(1,682
|
)
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
|
|
8,545
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
22,036
|
|
|
|
41,296
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,769
|
|
|
|
14,020
|
|
|
|
48,602
|
|
Other non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of common OP Units for Aimco Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
27,810
|
|
Conversion of preferred units and securities into common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
(Cancellation) origination of notes receivable from officers of
Aimco, net
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Common OP Units issued to Aimco pursuant to special
distributions (Note 11)
|
|
|
(148,746
|
)
|
|
|
(487,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
I-29
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
December 31,
2009
AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or the
Partnership, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries was
formed on May 16, 1994 to conduct the business of
acquiring, redeveloping, leasing, and managing multifamily
apartment properties. Our securities include Partnership Common
Units, or common OP Units, Partnership Preferred Units, or
preferred OP Units, and High Performance Partnership Units,
or High Performance Units, which are collectively referred to as
OP Units. Apartment Investment and Management
Company, or Aimco, is the owner of our general partner,
AIMCO-GP, Inc., or the General Partner, and special limited
partner, AIMCO-LP Trust, or the Special Limited Partner. The
General Partner and Special Limited Partner hold common
OP Units and are the primary holders of outstanding
preferred OP Units. Limited Partners refers to
individuals or entities that are our limited partners, other
than Aimco, the General Partner or the Special Limited Partner,
and own common OP Units or preferred OP Units.
Generally, after holding the common OP Units for one year,
the Limited Partners have the right to redeem their common
OP Units for cash, subject to our prior right to acquire
some or all of the common OP Units tendered for redemption
in exchange for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock.
Common OP Units redeemed for Aimco Class A Common
Stock are generally exchanged on a
one-for-one
basis (subject to antidilution adjustments). Preferred
OP Units and High Performance Units may or may not be
redeemable based on their respective terms, as provided for in
the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of AIMCO Properties, L.P. as amended, or the Partnership
Agreement.
We, through our operating divisions and subsidiaries, hold
substantially all of Aimcos assets and manage the daily
operations of Aimcos business and assets. Aimco is
required to contribute all proceeds from offerings of its
securities to us. In addition, substantially all of Aimcos
assets must be owned through the Partnership; therefore, Aimco
is generally required to contribute all assets acquired to us.
In exchange for the contribution of offering proceeds or assets,
Aimco receives additional interests in us with similar terms
(e.g., if Aimco contributes proceeds of a preferred stock
offering, Aimco (through the General Partner and Special Limited
Partner) receives preferred OP Units with terms
substantially similar to the preferred securities issued by
Aimco).
Aimco frequently consummates transactions for our benefit. For
legal, tax or other business reasons, Aimco may hold title or
ownership of certain assets until they can be transferred to us.
However, we have a controlling financial interest in
substantially all of Aimcos assets in the process of
transfer to us. Except as the context otherwise requires,
we, our and us refer to the
Partnership, and the Partnerships consolidated entities,
collectively. Except as the context otherwise requires,
Aimco refers to Aimco and Aimcos consolidated
entities, collectively.
As of December 31, 2009, we:
|
|
|
|
|
owned an equity interest in and consolidated 95,202 units
in 426 properties (which we refer to as consolidated
properties), of which 93,098 units were also managed
by us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned an equity interest in and did not consolidate
8,478 units in 77 properties (which we refer to as
unconsolidated properties), of which
3,594 units were also managed by us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided services for or managed 31,974 units in 367
properties, primarily pursuant to long-term agreements
(including 29,879 units in 345 properties for which we
provide asset management services only, and not also property
management services). In certain cases, we may indirectly own
generally less than one percent of the operations of such
properties through a partnership syndication or other fund.
|
At December 31, 2009, we had outstanding 122,509,304 common
OP Units, 28,096,618 preferred OP Units and 2,344,719
High Performance Units. At December 31, 2009, Aimco owned
116,479,791 of the common OP Units and 24,940,134 of the
preferred OP Units.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
Basis of
Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Partnership and its consolidated entities.
Pursuant to a Management and Contribution Agreement between the
Partnership and Aimco, we have acquired, in exchange for
interests in the Partnership, the economic benefits of
subsidiaries of Aimco in which we do not have an interest, and
Aimco has granted us a right of first refusal to acquire such
subsidiaries assets for no additional consideration.
Pursuant to the agreement, Aimco has also granted us certain
rights with respect to assets of such subsidiaries. We
consolidate all variable interest entities for which we are the
primary beneficiary. Generally, we
I-30
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
consolidate real estate partnerships and other entities that are
not variable interest entities when we own, directly or
indirectly, a majority voting interest in the entity or are
otherwise able to control the entity. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Interests held in consolidated real estate partnerships by
limited partners other than us are reflected as noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate partnerships. The assets
of consolidated real estate partnerships owned or controlled by
Aimco or us generally are not available to pay creditors of
Aimco or the Partnership.
As used herein, and except where the context otherwise requires,
partnership refers to a limited partnership or a
limited liability company and partner refers to a
partner in a limited partnership or a member in a limited
liability company.
Variable
Interest Entities
We consolidate all variable interest entities for which we are
the primary beneficiary. Generally, a variable interest entity,
or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following
characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is
not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a
group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack
(i) the ability to make decisions about an entitys
activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the
obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or
(iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of
the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights
that are not proportional to their economic interests and
substantially all of the entitys activities either
involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has
disproportionately few voting rights. The primary beneficiary
generally is the entity that will receive a majority of the
VIEs expected losses, receive a majority of the VIEs
expected residual returns, or both.
In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE,
we consider qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but
not limited to: the amount and characteristics of our
investment; the obligation or likelihood for us or other
investors to provide financial support; our and the other
investors ability to control or significantly influence
key decisions for the VIE; and the similarity with and
significance to the business activities of us and the other
investors. Significant judgments related to these determinations
include estimates about the current and future fair values and
performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market
conditions.
As of December 31, 2009, we were the primary beneficiary
of, and therefore consolidated, 90 VIEs, which owned 67
apartment properties with 9,652 units. Real estate with a
carrying amount of $769.4 million collateralized
$474.3 million of debt of those VIEs. The creditors of the
consolidated VIEs do not have recourse to our general credit. As
of December 31, 2009, we also held variable interests in
120 VIEs for which we were not the primary beneficiary. Those
VIEs consist primarily of partnerships that are engaged,
directly or indirectly, in the ownership and management of 172
apartment properties with 9,566 units. We are involved with
those VIEs as an equity holder, lender, management agent, or
through other contractual relationships. At December 31,
2009, our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our
involvement with unconsolidated VIEs is limited to our recorded
investments in and receivables from those VIEs totaling
$107.5 million and our contractual obligation to advance
funds to certain VIEs totaling $4.6 million. We may be
subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial
support that we voluntarily provide in the future. Additionally,
the provision of financial support in the future may require us
to consolidate a VIE.
In December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2009-17,
Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved
with Variable Interest Entities, or ASU
2009-17,
which is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009. ASU
2009-17,
which modifies the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 810, introduces a
more qualitative approach to evaluating VIEs for consolidation
and requires a company to perform an analysis to determine
whether its variable interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a VIE. This analysis identifies the primary
beneficiary of a VIE as the entity that has (a) the power
to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly
impact the VIEs economic performance, and (b) the
obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits
that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In determining
whether it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE
that most significantly affect the VIEs performance, ASU
2009-17
requires a company to assess whether it has an implicit
financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as
designed, requires continuous reassessment of primary
beneficiary status rather than periodic, event-driven
assessments as previously required, and incorporates expanded
disclosure requirements.
Our adoption of ASU
2009-17
during 2010 may result in changes in our conclusions
regarding whether we are required to consolidate certain
unconsolidated real estate partnerships that are VIEs. As of
December 31, 2009, in addition to the unconsolidated VIEs
discussed above, we held insignificant partnership interests in
VIEs that own approximately
I-31
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
250 properties. We hold general
and/or
limited partner interests generally ranging from less than 1% to
5% and our recorded investment in these entities is typically
limited to accounts receivable from our provision of property
management and asset management services to these partnerships.
We may be required to consolidate some of these VIEs if we
conclude that we control the activities that are significant to
the VIEs economic performance. Additionally, we may be
required to deconsolidate certain VIEs that we currently
consolidate if we conclude we do not control the activities that
are significant to such VIEs economic performance. We have
not yet completed our evaluation of ASU
2009-17 and
therefore have not determined the effect our adoption of
ASU 2009-17
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Acquisition
of Real Estate Assets and Related Depreciation and
Amortization
We capitalize the purchase price and incremental direct costs
associated with the acquisition of properties as the cost of the
assets acquired. We allocate the cost of acquired properties to
tangible assets and identified intangible assets based on their
fair values. We determine the fair value of tangible assets,
such as land, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment, on an
as-if vacant basis, generally using internal
valuation techniques that consider comparable market
transactions, discounted cash flow techniques, replacement costs
and other available information. We determine the fair value of
identified intangible assets (or liabilities), which typically
relate to in-place leases, using internal valuation techniques
that consider the terms of the in-place leases, current market
data for comparable leases, and our experience in leasing
similar properties. The intangible assets or liabilities related
to in-place leases are comprised of:
1. The value of the above- and below-market leases
in-place. An asset or liability is recognized based on the
difference between (a) the contractual amounts to be paid
pursuant to the in-place leases and (b) our estimate of
fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases,
measured over the period, including estimated lease renewals for
below-market leases, that the leases are expected to remain in
effect.
2. The estimated unamortized portion of avoided leasing
commissions and other costs that ordinarily would be incurred to
acquire the in-place leases.
3. The value associated with vacant units during the
absorption period (estimates of lost rental revenue during the
expected
lease-up
periods based on current market demand and stabilized occupancy
levels).
The values of the above- and below-market leases are amortized
to rental revenue over the expected remaining terms of the
associated leases. Other intangible assets related to in-place
leases are amortized to depreciation and amortization over the
expected remaining terms of the associated leases. Amortization
is adjusted, as necessary, to reflect any early lease
terminations that were not anticipated in determining
amortization periods.
Depreciation for all tangible real estate assets is calculated
using the straight-line method over their estimated useful
lives. Acquired buildings and improvements are depreciated over
a composite life of 14 to 52 years, based on the age,
condition and other physical characteristics of the property. As
discussed under Impairment of Long Lived Assets below, we
may adjust depreciation of properties that are expected to be
disposed of or demolished prior to the end of their useful
lives. Furniture, fixtures and equipment associated with
acquired properties are depreciated over five years.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, deferred income in our
consolidated balance sheets includes below-market lease amounts
totaling $31.8 million and $36.2 million,
respectively, which are net of accumulated amortization of
$21.0 million and $16.6 million, respectively.
Additions to below-market leases resulting from acquisitions
during the year ended December 31, 2007 totaled
$18.9 million, and there were no such additions during the
years ended December 31, 2009 or 2008. During the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we included
amortization of below-market leases of $4.4 million,
$4.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively, in rental
and other property revenues in our consolidated statements of
income. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we revised
the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in acquisitions completed in 2007, resulting in a
$4.7 million reduction of below-market lease values and a
corresponding reduction in buildings and improvements. At
December 31, 2009, our below-market leases had a weighted
average amortization period of 7.1 years and estimated
aggregate amortization for each of the five succeeding years as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Estimated amortization
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
I-32
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Capital
Additions and Related Depreciation
We capitalize costs, including certain indirect costs, incurred
in connection with our capital additions activities, including
redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property
improvements, and replacements of existing property components.
Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated
with time spent by site employees in connection with the
planning, execution and control of all capital additions
activities at the property level. We characterize as
indirect costs an allocation of certain department
costs, including payroll, at the area operations and corporate
levels that clearly relate to capital additions activities. We
capitalize interest, property taxes and insurance during periods
in which redevelopment and construction projects are in
progress. We charge to expense as incurred costs that do not
relate to capital expenditure activities, including ordinary
repairs, maintenance, resident turnover costs and general and
administrative expenses.
We depreciate capitalized costs using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful life of the related component or
improvement, which is generally five, 15 or 30 years. All
capitalized site payroll and indirect costs are allocated
proportionately, based on direct costs, among capital projects
and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of such projects.
Certain homogeneous items that are purchased in bulk on a
recurring basis, such as carpeting and appliances, are
depreciated using group methods that reflect the average
estimated useful life of the items in each group. Except in the
case of property casualties, where the net book value of lost
property is written off in the determination of casualty gains
or losses, we generally do not recognize any loss in connection
with the replacement of an existing property component because
normal replacements are considered in determining the estimated
useful lives used in connection with our composite and group
depreciation methods.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, for
continuing and discontinued operations, we capitalized
$9.8 million, $25.7 million and $30.8 million,
respectively, of interest costs, and $40.0 million,
$78.1 million and $78.1 million, respectively, of site
payroll and indirect costs, respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Our real estate and other long-lived assets classified as held
for use are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization, unless the carrying amounts are not recoverable.
If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an
impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property.
In connection with the preparation of our 2008 annual financial
statements, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in
our Lincoln Place property, located in Venice, California. Based
upon the declines in land values in Southern California during
2008 and the expected timing of our redevelopment efforts, we
determined that the total carrying amount of the property was no
longer probable of full recovery and, accordingly, during the
three months ended December 31, 2008, recognized an
impairment loss of $85.4 million ($55.6 million net of
tax).
Similarly, we assessed the recoverability of our investment in
Pacific Bay Vistas (formerly Treetops), a vacant property
located in San Bruno, California, and determined that the
carrying amount of the property was no longer probable of full
recovery and, accordingly, we recognized an impairment loss of
$5.7 million for this property during the three months
ended December 31, 2008.
In addition to the impairments of Lincoln Place and Pacific Bay
Vistas, based on periodic tests of recoverability of long-lived
assets, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2007, we
recorded real estate impairment losses of $2.3 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, related to properties
classified as held for use. For the year ended December 31,
2008, we recorded no similar impairment losses related to
properties classified as held for use.
We report impairment losses or recoveries related to properties
sold or classified as held for sale in discontinued operations.
Our tests of recoverability address real estate assets that do
not currently meet all conditions to be classified as held for
sale, but are expected to be disposed of prior to the end of
their estimated useful lives. If an impairment loss is not
required to be recorded, the recognition of depreciation is
adjusted prospectively, as necessary, to reduce the carrying
amount of the real estate to its estimated disposition value
over the remaining period that the real estate is expected to be
I-33
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
held and used. We also may adjust depreciation prospectively to
reduce to zero the carrying amount of buildings that we plan to
demolish in connection with a redevelopment project. These
depreciation adjustments decreased net income available to the
Partnerships common unitholders by $19.6 million,
$11.8 million and $37.3 million, and resulted in
decreases in basic and diluted earnings per unit of $0.16, $0.12
and $0.36, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
Cash
Equivalents
We classify highly liquid investments with an original maturity
of three months or less as cash equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted cash includes capital replacement reserves,
completion repair reserves, bond sinking fund amounts and tax
and insurance escrow accounts held by lenders.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are generally comprised of amounts
receivable from residents, amounts receivable from
non-affiliated real estate partnerships for which we provide
property management and other services and other miscellaneous
receivables from non-affiliated entities. We evaluate
collectibility of accounts receivable from residents and
establish an allowance, after the application of security
deposits and other anticipated recoveries, for accounts greater
than 30 days past due for current residents and all
receivables due from former residents. Accounts receivable from
residents are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of
approximately $1.4 million and $3.3 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We evaluate collectibility of accounts receivable from
non-affiliated entities and establish an allowance for amounts
that are considered to be uncollectible. Accounts receivable
relating to non-affiliated entities are stated net of allowances
for doubtful accounts of approximately $5.4 million and
$5.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts from
Affiliates
Accounts receivable from affiliates are generally comprised of
receivables related to property management and other services
provided to unconsolidated real estate partnerships in which we
have an ownership interest. We evaluate collectibility of
accounts receivable balances from affiliates on a periodic
basis, and establish an allowance for the amounts deemed to be
uncollectible. Accounts receivable from affiliates are stated
net of allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately
$1.9 million and $2.8 million as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Deferred
Costs
We defer lender fees and other direct costs incurred in
obtaining new financing and amortize the amounts over the terms
of the related loan agreements. Amortization of these costs is
included in interest expense.
We defer leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in
connection with successful leasing efforts and amortize the
costs over the terms of the related leases. Amortization of
these costs is included in depreciation and amortization.
Notes
Receivable from Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships and
Non-Affiliates and Related Interest Income and Provision for
Losses
Notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate partnerships
consist primarily of notes receivable from partnerships in which
we are the general partner but do not consolidate the
partnership. The ultimate repayment of these notes and those
from non-affiliates is subject to a number of variables,
including the performance and value of the underlying real
estate property and the claims of unaffiliated mortgage lenders.
Our notes receivable include loans extended by us that we carry
at the face amount plus accrued interest, which we refer to as
par value notes, and loans extended by predecessors
whose positions we generally acquired at a discount, which we
refer to as discounted notes.
We record interest income on par value notes as earned in
accordance with the terms of the related loan agreements. We
discontinue the accrual of interest on such notes when the notes
are impaired, as discussed below, or when there is otherwise
significant uncertainty as to the collection of interest. We
record income on such nonaccrual loans using the cost
I-34
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recovery method, under which we apply cash receipts first to the
recorded amount of the loan; thereafter, any additional receipts
are recognized as income.
We recognize interest income on discounted notes receivable
based upon whether the amount and timing of collections are both
probable and reasonably estimable. We consider collections to be
probable and reasonably estimable when the borrower has closed
or entered into certain pending transactions (which include real
estate sales, refinancings, foreclosures and rights offerings)
that provide a reliable source of repayment. In such instances,
we recognize accretion income, on a prospective basis using the
effective interest method over the estimated remaining term of
the loans, equal to the difference between the carrying amount
of the discounted notes and the estimated collectible value. We
record income on all other discounted notes using the cost
recovery method.
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic
basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of
cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether
estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and
interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note.
We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable
that principal and interest will not be received in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the
impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value
of the partnerships real estate that represents the
primary source of loan repayment. In certain instances where
other sources of cash flow are available to repay the loan, the
impairment is measured by discounting the estimated cash flows
at the loans original effective interest rate. See
Note 5 for further discussion of Notes Receivable.
Investments
in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We own general and limited partner interests in real estate
partnerships that own apartment properties. We generally account
for investments in real estate partnerships that we do not
consolidate under the equity method. Under the equity method,
our share of the earnings or losses of the entity for the
periods being presented is included in equity in earnings
(losses) from unconsolidated real estate partnerships, except
for our share of impairments and property disposition gains
related to such entities, which we report separately in the
consolidated statements of income. Certain investments in real
estate partnerships that were acquired in business combinations
were determined to have insignificant value at the acquisition
date and are accounted for under the cost method. Any
distributions received from such partnerships are recognized as
income when received.
The excess of the cost of the acquired partnership interests
over the historical carrying amount of partners equity or
deficit is ascribed generally to the fair values of land and
buildings owned by the partnerships. We amortize the excess cost
related to the buildings over the estimated useful lives of the
buildings. Such amortization is recorded as a component of
equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated real estate
partnerships.
Intangible
Assets
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, other assets included
goodwill associated with our real estate segment of
$71.8 million and $81.9 million, respectively. We
perform an annual impairment test of goodwill that compares the
fair value of reporting units with their carrying amounts,
including goodwill. We determined that our goodwill was not
impaired in 2009, 2008 or 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we allocated
$10.1 million of goodwill related to our real estate
segment to the carrying amounts of the properties sold or
classified as held for sale. The amounts of goodwill allocated
to these properties were based on the relative fair values of
the properties sold or classified as held for sale and the
retained portions of the reporting units to which the goodwill
as allocated. During 2008 and 2007, we did not allocate any
goodwill to properties sold or classified as held for sale as
real estate properties were not considered businesses under then
applicable accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, or GAAP.
Other assets also includes intangible assets for purchased
management contracts with finite lives that we amortize on a
straight-line basis over terms ranging from five to
20 years and intangible assets for in-place leases as
discussed under Acquisition of Real Estate Assets and Related
Depreciation and Amortization.
Capitalized
Software Costs
Purchased software and other costs related to software developed
for internal use are capitalized during the application
development stage and are amortized using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally
five years. We write-off the costs of software development
projects when it is no longer probable that
I-35
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the software will be completed and placed in service. For the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
capitalized software development costs totaling
$5.6 million, $20.9 million and $11.9 million,
respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, other assets
included $29.7 million and $35.7 million of net
capitalized software, respectively. During the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized
amortization of capitalized software of $11.5 million,
$10.0 million and $10.8 million, respectively, which
is included in depreciation and amortization in our consolidated
statements of income.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we reassessed our
approach to communication technology needs at our properties,
which resulted in the discontinuation of an infrastructure
project and a $5.4 million write-off of related hardware
and capitalized internal and consulting costs included in other
assets. The write-off, which is net of sales proceeds, is
included in other expenses, net. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, we additionally recorded a
$1.6 million write-off of certain software and hardware
assets that are no longer consistent with our information
technology strategy. This write-off is included in depreciation
and amortization. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
we abandoned certain internal-use software development projects
and recorded a $4.2 million write-off of the capitalized
costs of such projects in depreciation and amortization. There
were no similar write-offs during the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Partnerships
We report the unaffiliated partners interests in our
consolidated real estate partnerships as noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate partnerships.
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships represent the noncontrolling partners share
of the underlying net assets of our consolidated real estate
partnerships. Prior to 2009, when these consolidated real estate
partnerships made cash distributions to partners in excess of
the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest, we generally
recorded a charge equal to the amount of such excess
distribution, even though there was no economic effect or cost.
These charges are reported in the consolidated statements of
income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
within noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships. Also prior to 2009, we allocated the
noncontrolling partners share of partnership losses to
noncontrolling partners to the extent of the carrying amount of
the noncontrolling interest. We generally recorded a charge when
the noncontrolling partners share of partnership losses
exceed the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest, even
though there is no economic effect or cost. These charges are
reported in the consolidated statements of income within
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships. We did not record charges for distributions or
losses in certain limited instances where the noncontrolling
partner had a legal obligation and financial capacity to
contribute additional capital to the partnership. For the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded charges for
partnership losses resulting from depreciation of approximately
$9.0 million and $12.2 million, respectively that were
not allocated to noncontrolling partners because the losses
exceeded the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest.
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships consist primarily of equity interests held by
limited partners in consolidated real estate partnerships that
have finite lives. The terms of the related partnership
agreements generally require the partnership to be liquidated
following the sale of the partnerships real estate. As the
general partner in these partnerships, we ordinarily control the
execution of real estate sales and other events that could lead
to the liquidation, redemption or other settlement of
noncontrolling interests. The aggregate carrying amount of
noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate
partnerships is approximately $317.1 million at
December 31, 2009. The aggregate fair value of these
interests varies based on the fair value of the real estate
owned by the partnerships. Based on the number of classes of
finite-life noncontrolling interests, the number of properties
in which there is direct or indirect noncontrolling ownership,
complexities in determining the allocation of liquidation
proceeds among partners and other factors, we believe it is
impracticable to determine the total required payments to the
noncontrolling interests in an assumed liquidation at
December 31, 2009. As a result of real estate depreciation
that is recognized in our financial statements and appreciation
in the fair value of real estate that is not recognized in our
financial statements, we believe that the aggregate fair value
of our noncontrolling interests exceeds their aggregate carrying
amount. As a result of our ability to control real estate sales
and other events that require payment of noncontrolling
interests and our expectation that proceeds from real estate
sales will be sufficient to liquidate related noncontrolling
interests, we anticipate that the eventual liquidation of these
noncontrolling interests will not have an adverse impact on our
financial condition.
Revenue
Recognition
Our properties have operating leases with apartment residents
with terms generally of 12 months or less. We recognize
rental revenue related to these leases, net of any concessions,
on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
I-36
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We recognize revenues from property management, asset
management, syndication and other services when the related fees
are earned and are realized or realizable.
Advertising
Costs
We generally expense all advertising costs as incurred to
property operating expense. For the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, for both continuing and
discontinued operations, total advertising expense was
$25.0 million, $36.0 million and $38.0 million,
respectively.
Insurance
We believe that our insurance coverages insure our properties
adequately against the risk of loss attributable to fire,
earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, and other perils. In
addition, we have insurance coverage for substantial portions of
our property, workers compensation, health, and general
liability exposures. Losses are accrued based upon our estimates
of the aggregate liability for uninsured losses incurred using
certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry
and based on our experience.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We recognize all stock-based employee compensation, including
grants of employee stock options, in the consolidated financial
statements based on the grant date fair value and recognize
compensation cost, which is net of estimates for expected
forfeitures, ratably over the awards requisite service
period. See Note 12 for further discussion of our
stock-based compensation.
Tax
Credit Arrangements
We sponsor certain partnerships that own and operate apartment
properties that qualify for tax credits under Section 42 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to
as the Code, and for the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, or HUD, subsidized rents under HUDs
Section 8 program. These partnerships acquire, develop and
operate qualifying affordable housing properties and are
structured to provide for the pass-through of tax credits and
deductions to their partners. The tax credits are generally
realized ratably over the first ten years of the tax credit
arrangement and are subject to the partnerships compliance
with applicable laws and regulations for a period of
15 years. Typically, we are the general partner with a
legal ownership interest of one percent or less. We market
limited partner interests of at least 99 percent to
unaffiliated institutional investors (which we refer to as tax
credit investors or investors) and receive a syndication fee
from each investor upon such investors admission to the
partnership. At inception, each investor agrees to fund capital
contributions to the partnerships. We agree to perform various
services to the partnerships in exchange for fees over the
expected duration of the tax credit service period. The related
partnership agreements generally require adjustment of each tax
credit investors required capital contributions if actual
tax benefits to such investor differ from projected amounts.
We have determined that the partnerships in these arrangements
are variable interest entities and, where we are general
partner, we are generally the primary beneficiary that is
required to consolidate the partnerships. When the contractual
arrangements obligate us to deliver tax benefits to the
investors, and entitle us through fee arrangements to receive
substantially all available cash flow from the partnerships, we
account for these partnerships as wholly owned subsidiaries.
Capital contributions received by the partnerships from tax
credit investors represent, in substance, consideration that we
receive in exchange for our obligation to deliver tax credits
and other tax benefits to the investors, and the receipts are
recognized as revenue in our consolidated financial statements
when our obligation to the investors is relieved upon delivery
of the expected tax benefits.
In summary, our accounting treatment recognizes the income or
loss generated by the underlying real estate based on our
economic interest in the partnerships. Proceeds received in
exchange for the transfer of the tax credits are recognized as
revenue proportionately as the tax benefits are delivered to the
tax credit investors and our obligation is relieved. Syndication
fees and related costs are recognized in income upon completion
of the syndication effort. We recognize syndication fees in
amounts determined based on a market rate analysis of fees for
comparable services, which generally fell within a range of 10%
to 15% of investor contributions during the periods presented.
Other direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring these
arrangements are deferred and amortized over the expected
duration of the arrangement in proportion to the recognition of
related income. Investor contributions in excess of recognized
revenue are reported as deferred income in our consolidated
balance sheets.
I-37
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized syndication fee income of $3.4 million and
$13.8 million, respectively. We recognized no syndication
fee income during the year ended December 31, 2009. During
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we
recognized revenue associated with the delivery of tax benefits
of $36.6 million, $29.4 million and
$24.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and
2008, $148.1 million and $159.6 million, respectively, of
investor contributions in excess of the recognized revenue were
included in deferred income in our consolidated balance sheets.
Discontinued
Operations
We classify certain properties and related assets and
liabilities as held for sale when they meet certain criteria.
The operating results of such properties as well as those
properties sold during the periods presented are included in
discontinued operations in both current periods and all
comparable periods presented. Depreciation is not recorded on
properties once they have been classified as held for sale;
however, depreciation expense recorded prior to classification
as held for sale is included in discontinued operations. The net
gain on sale and any impairment losses are presented in
discontinued operations when recognized. See Note 13 for
additional information regarding discontinued operations.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
We primarily use long-term, fixed-rate and
self-amortizing
non-recourse debt to avoid, among other things, risk related to
fluctuating interest rates. For our variable rate debt, we are
sometimes required by our lenders to limit our exposure to
interest rate fluctuations by entering into interest rate swap
or cap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements moderate
our exposure to interest rate risk by effectively converting the
interest on variable rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest
rate cap agreements effectively limit our exposure to interest
rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable
interest rate. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are
reflected as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet, and
periodic changes in fair value are included in interest expense
or equity, as appropriate. These interest rate caps are not
material to our financial position or results of operations.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had interest rate
swaps with aggregate notional amounts of $52.3 million and
$27.2 million, and recorded fair values of
$1.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively, reflected
in accrued liabilities and other in our consolidated balance
sheets. At December 31, 2009, these interest rate swaps had
a weighted average term of 11.1 years. We have designated
these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges and recognize any
changes in their fair value as an adjustment of accumulated
other comprehensive income within partners capital to the
extent of their effectiveness. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we recognized changes in fair value of
$1.0 million, of which $1.4 million resulted in an
adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss within
consolidated partners capital. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, we recognized changes in fair value of
$2.2 million, of which $2.1 million resulted in an
adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss within
consolidated partners capital. We recognized
$0.4 million and less than $0.1 million of
ineffectiveness as an adjustment of interest expense during the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
we recognized no ineffectiveness during the year ended
December 31, 2007. Our consolidated comprehensive loss for
the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $42.6 million
and our comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, totaled $625.6 million and
$125.5 million, respectively, before the effects of
noncontrolling interests. If the forward rates at
December 31, 2009 remain constant, we estimate that during
the next twelve months, we would reclassify into earnings
approximately $1.5 million of the unrealized losses in
accumulated other comprehensive income.
We have entered into total rate of return swaps on various fixed
rate secured tax-exempt bonds payable and fixed rate notes
payable to convert these borrowings from a fixed rate to a
variable rate and provide an efficient financing product to
lower our cost of borrowing. In exchange for our receipt of a
fixed rate generally equal to the underlying borrowings
interest rate, the total rate of return swaps require that we
pay a variable rate, equivalent to the Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index, or SIFMA,
rate for tax-exempt bonds payable and the
30-day LIBOR
rate for notes payable, plus a risk spread. These swaps
generally have a second or third lien on the property
collateralized by the related borrowings and the obligations
under certain of these swaps are cross-collateralized with
certain of the other swaps with a particular counterparty. The
underlying borrowings are generally callable at our option, with
no prepayment penalty, with 30 days advance notice, and the
swaps generally have a term of less than five years. The total
rate of return swaps have a contractually defined termination
value generally equal to the difference between the fair value
and the counterpartys purchased value of the underlying
borrowings, which may require payment by us or to us for such
difference. Accordingly, we believe fluctuations in the fair
value of the borrowings from the inception of the hedging
relationship generally will be offset by a corresponding
fluctuation in the fair value of the total rate of return swaps.
I-38
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We designate total rate of return swaps as hedges of the risk of
overall changes in the fair value of the underlying borrowings.
At each reporting period, we estimate the fair value of these
borrowings and the total rate of return swaps and recognize any
changes therein as an adjustment of interest expense. We
evaluate the effectiveness of these fair value hedges at the end
of each reporting period and recognize an adjustment of interest
expense as a result of any ineffectiveness.
Borrowings payable subject to total rate of return swaps with
aggregate outstanding principal balances of $352.7 million
and $421.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, are reflected as variable rate borrowings in
Note 6. Due to changes in the estimated fair values of
these debt instruments and the corresponding total rate of
return swaps, we increased property loans payable by
$5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and
reduced property loans payable by $20.1 million and
$9.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively, with offsetting adjustments to accrued
liabilities, resulting in no net effect on net income. Refer to
Fair Value Measurements for further discussion of fair
value measurements related to these arrangements. During 2009,
2008 and 2007, we determined these hedges were fully effective
and accordingly we made no adjustments to interest expense for
ineffectiveness.
At December 31, 2009, the weighted average fixed receive
rate under the total return swaps was 6.8% and the weighted
average variable pay rate was 1.0%, based on the applicable
SIFMA and
30-day LIBOR
rates effective as of that date. Further information related to
our total return swaps as of December 31, 2009 is as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
Swap Variable
|
|
|
Year of Debt
|
|
Average Debt
|
|
Swap Notional
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Pay Rate at
|
Debt Principal
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Amount
|
|
Date
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
2031
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
108.7
|
|
|
|
2036
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
2038
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
2048
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
352.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
353.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements
Beginning in 2008, we applied the FASBs revised accounting
provisions related to fair value measurements, which are
codified in FASB ASC Topic 820. These revised provisions define
fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date, establish a
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing
fair value estimates and require disclosure of fair value
measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to
unobservable data (Level 3 measurements), such as the
reporting entitys own data. We adopted the revised fair
value measurement provisions that apply to recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements of financial assets and
liabilities effective January 1, 2008, and the provisions
that apply to the remaining fair value measurements effective
January 1, 2009, and at those times determined no
transition adjustments were required.
The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs
to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement
date and includes three levels defined as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices for
identical and unrestricted assets or liabilities in active
markets
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are
significant to the fair value measurement
A financial instruments categorization within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
I-39
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies used
for our significant assets or liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Although some of the
valuation methodologies use observable market inputs in limited
instances, the majority of inputs we use are unobservable and
are therefore classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
Provisions
for Real Estate Impairment Losses
If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
a property may not be recoverable, we make an assessment of its
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to our estimate
of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest
charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the
aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an
impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the
estimated fair value of the property, for properties classified
as held for use, and estimated fair value of the property, less
estimated selling costs, for properties classified as held for
sale.
We estimate the fair value of real estate using income and
market valuation techniques using information such as broker
estimates, purchase prices for recent transactions on comparable
assets and net operating income capitalization analyses using
observable and unobservable inputs such as capitalization rates,
asset quality grading, geographic location analysis, and local
supply and demand observations. For certain properties
classified as held for sale, we may also recognize the
impairment loss based on the contract sale price, which we
believe is representative of fair value, less estimated selling
costs.
Notes
Receivable
We assess the collectibility of notes receivable on a periodic
basis, which assessment consists primarily of an evaluation of
cash flow projections of the borrower to determine whether
estimated cash flows are sufficient to repay principal and
interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the note.
We recognize impairments on notes receivable when it is probable
that principal and interest will not be received in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan. The amount of the
impairment to be recognized generally is based on the fair value
of the real estate, which represents the primary source of loan
repayment. The fair value of real estate is estimated through
income and market valuation approaches using information such as
broker estimates, purchase prices for recent transactions on
comparable assets and net operating income capitalization
analyses using observable and unobservable inputs such as
capitalization rates, asset quality grading, geographic location
analysis, and local supply and demand observations.
Interest
Rate Swaps
We estimate the fair value of interest rate swaps using an
income approach with primarily observable inputs, including
information regarding the hedged variable cash flows and forward
yield curves relating to the variable interest rates on which
the hedged cash flows are based.
Total
Rate of Return Swaps
Our total rate of return swaps have contractually-defined
termination values generally equal to the difference between the
fair value and the counterpartys purchased value of the
underlying borrowings. Upon termination, we are required to pay
the counterparty the difference if the fair value is less than
the purchased value, and the counterparty is required to pay us
the difference if the fair value is greater than the purchased
value. The underlying borrowings are generally callable, at our
option, at face value prior to maturity and with no prepayment
penalty. Due to our control of the call features in the
underlying borrowings, we believe the inherent value of any
differential between the fixed and variable cash payments due
under the swaps would be significantly discounted by a market
participant willing to purchase or assume any rights and
obligations under these contracts.
The swaps are generally cross-collateralized with other swap
contracts with the same counterparty and do not allow transfer
or assignment, thus there is no alternate or secondary market
for these instruments. Accordingly, our assumptions about the
fair value that a willing market participant would assign in
valuing these instruments are based on a hypothetical market in
which the highest and best use of these contracts is in-use in
combination with the related borrowings, similar to how we use
the contracts. Based on these assumptions, we believe the
termination value, or exit value, of the swaps approximates the
fair value that would be assigned by a willing market
participant. We calculate the termination value using a market
approach by reference to estimates of the fair value of the
underlying borrowings, which are discussed below, and an
evaluation of potential changes in the credit quality of the
counterparties to these arrangements. We
I-40
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
compare our estimates of the fair value of the swaps and related
borrowings to the valuations provided by the counterparties on a
quarterly basis.
Our method for calculating fair value of the swaps generally
results in changes in fair value equal to the changes in fair
value of the related borrowings. Accordingly, we believe these
instruments are highly effective in offsetting the changes in
fair value of the borrowings during the hedging period.
Changes
in Fair Value of Borrowings Subject to Total Rate of Return
Swaps
We recognize changes in the fair value of certain borrowings
subject to total rate of return swaps, which we have designated
as fair value hedges.
We estimate the fair value of debt instruments using an income
and market approach, including comparison of the contractual
terms to observable and unobservable inputs such as market
interest rate risk spreads, collateral quality and
loan-to-value
ratios on similarly encumbered assets within our portfolio.
These borrowings are collateralized and non-recourse to us;
therefore, we believe changes in our credit rating will not
materially affect a market participants estimate of the
borrowings fair value.
The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation
that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective
of future fair values. Furthermore, although we believe our
valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other
market participants, the use of different methodologies or
assumptions to determine the fair value of certain assets and
liabilities could result in a different estimate of fair value
at the reporting date.
The table below presents amounts at December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 (and the changes in fair value between such dates) for
significant items measured in our consolidated balance sheets at
fair value (in thousands). Certain of these fair value
measurements are based on significant unobservable inputs
classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. When
a determination is made to classify a fair value measurement
within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the
determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable
factors to the overall fair value measurement. However,
Level 3 fair value measurements typically include, in
addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components,
observable components that can be validated to observable
external sources; accordingly, the changes in fair value in the
table below are due in part to observable factors that are part
of the valuation methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments Subject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Total Rate of
|
|
|
to Total Rate of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Return Swaps
|
|
|
Return Swaps
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,420
|
|
|
$
|
(371
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings(1)(2)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(20,075
|
)
|
|
|
20,075
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in partners capital
|
|
|
(2,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
(2,557
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,495
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,495
|
|
|
$
|
(2,557
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings(1)(2)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
|
(5,188
|
)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in partners capital
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,307
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,307
|
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) relate to periodic revaluations of
fair value and have not resulted from the settlement of a swap
position. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of income. |
I-41
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition to the amounts in the table above, during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized
$56.9 million, $118.6 million and $6.5 million,
respectively, of provisions for real estate impairment losses
(including amounts in discontinued operations) to reduce the
carrying amounts of certain real estate properties to their
estimated fair value (or fair value less estimated costs to
sell) and provisions for losses on notes receivable of
$21.5 million, $17.6 million and $2.0 million,
respectively, based on our estimates of the fair value of the
real estate properties that represent the primary source of
repayment. Based on the significance of the unobservable inputs
used in our methods for estimating the fair values for these
amounts, we classify these fair value measurements within
Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Disclosures
Regarding Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the aggregate fair value of our cash and cash
equivalents, receivables, payables and short-term secured debt
approximates their aggregate carrying value at December 31,
2009, due to their relatively short-term nature and high
probability of realization. We estimate fair value for our notes
receivable and debt instruments using present value techniques
that include income and market valuation approaches using
observable inputs such as market rates for debt with the same or
similar terms and unobservable inputs such as collateral quality
and
loan-to-value
ratios on similarly encumbered assets. Present value
calculations vary depending on the assumptions used, including
the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In many
cases, the fair value estimates may not be realizable in
immediate settlement of the instruments. The estimated aggregate
fair value of our notes receivable was approximately
$126.1 million and $161.6 million at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 5 for further
information on notes receivable. The estimated aggregate fair
value of our consolidated debt (including amounts reported in
liabilities related to assets held for sale) was approximately
$5.7 billion and $6.7 billion at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The combined carrying amount of our
consolidated debt (including amounts reported in liabilities
related to assets held for sale) was approximately
$5.7 billion and $6.8 billion at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 6 and Note 7 for
further details on our consolidated debt. Refer to Derivative
Financial Instruments for further discussion regarding
certain of our fixed rate debt that is subject to total rate of
return swap instruments.
Income
Taxes
We are treated as a pass-through entity for United
States Federal income tax purposes and are not subject to United
States Federal income taxation. Each of our partners, however,
is subject to tax on his allocable share of partnership tax
items, including partnership income, gains, losses, deductions
and credits, or Partnership Tax Items, for each taxable year
during which he is a partner, regardless of whether he receives
any actual distributions of cash or other property from us
during the taxable year. Generally, the characterization of any
particular Partnership Tax Item is determined by us, rather than
at the partner level, and the amount of a partners
allocable share of such item is governed by the terms of the
Partnership Agreement. The General Partner is our tax
matters partner for United States Federal income tax
purposes. The tax matters partner is authorized, but not
required, to take certain actions on behalf of us with respect
to tax matters.
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code
commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994,
and intends to continue to operate in such a manner.
Aimcos current and continuing qualification as a REIT
depends on its ability to meet the various requirements imposed
by the Code, which are related to organizational structure,
distribution levels, diversity of stock ownership and certain
restrictions with regard to owned assets and categories of
income. If Aimco qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it will
generally not be subject to United States Federal corporate
income tax on our taxable income that is currently distributed
to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the
double taxation (at the corporate and stockholder
levels) that generally results from an investment in a
corporation.
Even if Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to United
States Federal income and excise taxes in various situations,
such as on our undistributed income. Aimco also will be required
to pay a 100% tax on any net income on non-arms length
transactions between it and a TRS (described below) and on any
net income from sales of property that was property held for
sale to customers in the ordinary course. Aimco and its
stockholders may be subject to state or local taxation in
various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which
Aimco transacts business or Aimcos stockholders reside. In
addition, Aimco could also be subject to the alternative minimum
tax, or AMT, on our items of tax preference. The state and local
tax laws may not conform to the United States Federal income tax
treatment. Any taxes imposed on Aimco reduce its and our
operating cash flow and net income.
Certain of Aimcos operations, or a portion thereof,
including property management, asset management and risk are
conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, which are
subsidiaries of the Partnership, and each of which we refer to
as a
I-42
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
TRS. A TRS is a C-corporation that has not elected REIT status
and as such is subject to United States Federal corporate income
tax. Aimco uses TRS entities to facilitate its ability to offer
certain services and activities to its residents, as these
services and activities generally cannot be offered directly by
the REIT. Aimco also uses TRS entities to hold investments in
certain properties.
For Aimcos TRS entities, deferred income taxes result from
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for Federal income tax purposes, and are measured using the
enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect
when the differences reverse. We reduce deferred tax assets by
recording a valuation allowance when we determine based on
available evidence that it is more likely than not that the
assets will not be realized. We recognize the tax consequences
associated with intercompany transfers between the REIT and TRS
entities when the related assets are sold to third parties,
impaired or otherwise disposed of for financial reporting
purposes.
In March 2008, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service
that it intended to examine our 2006 Federal tax return. During
June 2008, the IRS issued AIMCO-GP, Inc., our general and tax
matters partner, a summary report including the IRSs
proposed adjustments to our 2006 Federal tax return. In
addition, in May 2009, we were notified by the IRS that it
intended to examine our 2007 Federal tax return. During November
2009, the IRS issued AIMCO-GP, Inc. a summary report including
the IRSs proposed adjustments to our 2007 Federal tax
return. We do not expect the 2006 or 2007 proposed adjustments
to have any material effect on our unrecognized tax benefits,
financial condition or results of operations.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially could subject us to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of
notes receivable and total rate of return swaps. As discussed in
Note 5, a significant portion of our notes receivable at
December 31, 2009, are collateralized by properties in the
West Harlem area of New York City. There are no other
significant concentrations of credit risk with respect to our
notes receivable due to the large number of partnerships that
are borrowers under the notes and the geographic diversity of
the properties that collateralize the notes.
At December 31, 2009, we had total rate of return swap
positions with two financial institutions totaling
$353.1 million. The swap positions with one counterparty
are comprised of $340.9 million of fixed rate debt
effectively converted to variable rates using total rate of
return swaps, including $295.7 million of tax-exempt bonds
indexed to SIFMA and $45.2 million of taxable second
mortgage notes indexed to LIBOR. Additionally, the swap
agreements with this counterparty provide for collateral calls
to maintain specified
loan-to-value
ratios. As of December 31, 2009, we were not required to
provide cash collateral pursuant to the total rate of return
swaps. We have one swap position with another counterparty that
is comprised of $12.2 million of fixed rate tax-exempt
bonds indexed to SIFMA. We periodically evaluate counterparty
credit risk associated with these arrangements. At the current
time, we have concluded we do not have material exposure. In the
event either counterparty were to default under these
arrangements, loss of the net interest benefit we generally
receive under these arrangements, which is equal to the
difference between the fixed rate we receive and the variable
rate we pay, may adversely impact our results of operations and
operating cash flows. In the event the values of the real estate
properties serving as collateral under these agreements decline,
we may be required to provide additional collateral pursuant to
the swap agreements, which may adversely affect our cash flows.
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, or
SFAS 168, which is effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Upon the effective date of
SFAS 168, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or
the FASB ASC, became the single source of authoritative GAAP
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC, under authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. The FASB ASC superseded all then-existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards, and all other
non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in
the FASB ASC is now non-authoritative. Subsequent to the
effective date of SFAS 168, the FASB will issue Accounting
Standards Updates that serve to update the FASB ASC.
I-43
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Business
Combinations
We adopted the provisions of FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business
Combinations a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 141, or SFAS 141(R), which are codified in
FASB ASC Topic 805, effective January 1, 2009. These
provisions apply to all transactions or events in which an
entity obtains control of one or more businesses, including
those effected without the transfer of consideration, for
example by contract or through a lapse of minority veto rights.
These provisions require the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in the transaction (whether a full or
partial acquisition); establish the acquisition-date fair value
as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed; and require expensing of most transaction
and restructuring costs.
We believe most operating real estate assets meet the revised
definition of a business. Accordingly, beginning in 2009, we
expense transaction costs associated with acquisitions of
operating real estate or interests therein when we consolidate
the asset. The FASB did not provide implementation guidance
regarding the treatment of acquisition costs incurred prior to
December 31, 2008, for acquisitions that did not close
until 2009. The SEC indicated any of the following three
transition methods were acceptable, provided that the method
chosen is disclosed and applied consistently:
1) expense acquisition costs in 2008 when it is probable
that the acquisition will not close in 2008;
2) expense acquisition costs January 1, 2009; or
3) give retroactive treatment to the acquisition costs
January 1, 2009, by retroactively adjusting prior periods
to record acquisition costs in the prior periods in which they
were incurred.
We elected to apply the third method and accordingly have
retroactively adjusted our results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008, by $3.5 million, which also
resulted in a corresponding reduction to our December 31,
2008 equity balance. This retroactive adjustment is reflected in
investment management expenses in our accompanying consolidated
statements of income and reduced basic and diluted earnings per
unit amounts by $0.04 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Noncontrolling
Interests
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51, or
SFAS 160, which are codified in FASB ASC Topic 810. These
provisions clarified that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary is an ownership interest in a consolidated entity,
which should be reported as equity in the parents
consolidated financial statements. These provisions require
disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statements,
of the amounts of consolidated net income and other
comprehensive income attributable to controlling and
noncontrolling interests, eliminating the past practice of
reporting amounts of income attributable to noncontrolling
interests as an adjustment in arriving at consolidated net
income. These provisions also require us to attribute to
noncontrolling interests their share of losses even if such
attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance
within our equity accounts, and in some instances, recognize a
gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.
In connection with our retrospective application of these
provisions, we reclassified into our consolidated equity
accounts the historical balances related to noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate partnerships. At
December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate partnerships was
$381.8 million.
Beginning in 2009, we no longer record a charge related to cash
distributions to noncontrolling interests in excess of the
carrying amount of such noncontrolling interests, and we
attribute losses to noncontrolling interests even if such
attribution results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance
within our equity accounts. The following table illustrates the
pro forma amounts of loss from continuing operations,
discontinued operations and net loss that would have been
attributed to the Partnerships common unitholders for the
year ended December 31, 2009, had we applied the accounting
I-44
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
provisions related to noncontrolling interests prior to their
amendment by SFAS 160 (in thousands, except per unit
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(235,815
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
92,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(143,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.91
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in our ownership interest in consolidated real estate
partnerships generally consist of our purchase of an additional
interest in or the sale of our entire interest in a consolidated
real estate partnership. Our purchase of additional interests in
consolidated real estate partnerships had no direct effect on
partners equity attributable to the Partnership during the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and did not have a
significant effect on partners capital attributable to the
Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2009. The
effect on our capital of sales of our entire interest in
consolidated real estate partnerships is reflected in our
consolidated financial statements as sales of real estate and
accordingly the effect on our capital is reflected as gains on
disposition of real estate, less the amounts of such gains
attributable to noncontrolling interests, within consolidated
net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders.
Earnings
per Unit
We calculate earnings per unit based on the weighted average
number of common OP Units, common OP Unit equivalents,
participating securities and other potentially dilutive
securities outstanding during the period (see Note 14).
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Statement of Position
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, or FSP
EITF 03-6-1,
which are codified in FASB ASC Topic 260. FSP
EITF 03-6-1
clarified that unvested share-based payment awards that
participate in dividends similar to shares of common stock or
common partnership units should be treated as participating
securities. FSP
EITF 03-6-1
affects our computation of basic and diluted earnings per unit
for unvested restricted stock awards and shares purchased
pursuant to officer stock loans, which serve as collateral for
such loans, both of which entitle the holders to dividends.
Refer to Note 14, which details our calculation of earnings
per unit and the effect of our retroactive application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on our earnings per unit.
In December 2009, we adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting
Standards Update
2010-01,
Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components
of Stock and Cash, or ASU
2010-01,
which are codified in FASB ASC Topic 505. ASU
2010-01
requires that for distributions with components of cash and
stock, the portion distributed in stock should be accounted for
prospectively as a stock issuance with no retroactive adjustment
to basic and diluted earnings per share. In accordance with ASU
2010-01, we
retrospectively revised the accounting treatment of our special
distributions paid during 2008 and 2009, resulting in changes in
the number of weighted average units outstanding and earnings
per unit amounts for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, as compared to the amounts previously reported.
I-45
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the effects of these changes in
accounting treatment on our basic and diluted weighted average
units outstanding and on net income (loss) attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders per common unit for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted average units outstanding basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported
|
|
|
130,772
|
|
|
|
149,883
|
|
Reduction in weighted average units outstanding
|
|
|
(32,523
|
)
|
|
|
(45,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As currently reported
|
|
|
98,249
|
|
|
|
104,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders per common unit basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported
|
|
$
|
3.17
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
Effect of reduction in weighted average units outstanding
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
Effect of participating securities allocations
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As currently reported
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts included in the
financial statements and accompanying notes thereto. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Restatement
to Reclassify Impairment Losses on Real Estate Development
Assets
Our consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2008, has been restated to reclassify the
provision for impairment losses on real estate development
assets into operating income. The reclassification reduced
operating income by $91.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, and had no effect on the reported
amounts of loss before income taxes and discontinued operations,
loss from continuing operations, net income, net income
available to the Partnerships common unitholders or
earnings per unit. Additionally, the reclassification had no
effect on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2008, or the consolidated statements of partners capital
and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Reclassifications
Certain items included in the 2008 and 2007 financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
|
|
NOTE 3
|
Real
Estate and Partnership Acquisitions and Other Significant
Transactions
|
Real
Estate Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not acquire
any real estate properties.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired three
conventional properties with a total of 470 units, located
in San Jose, California, Brighton, Massachusetts and
Seattle, Washington. The aggregate purchase price of
$111.5 million, excluding transaction costs, was funded
using $39.0 million in proceeds from property loans,
$41.9 million in tax-free exchange proceeds (provided by
2008 real estate dispositions) and the remainder in cash.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we completed the
acquisition of 16 conventional properties with approximately
1,300 units for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $217.0 million, excluding transaction costs.
Of the 16 properties acquired, ten are located in New York City,
New York, two in Daytona Beach, Florida, one in Park Forest,
Illinois, one in Poughkeepsie, New York, one in Redwood City,
California, and one in North San Diego, California. The
purchases were funded with cash, tax-free exchange proceeds, new
debt and the assumption of existing debt.
I-46
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisitions
of Partnership Interests
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not acquire
a significant amount of limited partnership interests. During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we acquired
limited partnership interests in 22 and 50 partnerships,
respectively, in which our affiliates served as general partner.
In connection with such acquisitions, we paid cash of
approximately $2.0 million and $47.4 million,
including transaction costs. The cost of the acquisitions was
approximately $2.4 million and $43.6 million in excess
of the carrying amount of noncontrolling interest in such
limited partnerships, which excess we generally assigned to real
estate.
Disposition
of Unconsolidated Real Estate and Other
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized
$22.5 million in gains on disposition of unconsolidated
real estate and other. Gains recognized in 2009 primarily
consist of $8.6 million related to our receipt in 2009 of
additional proceeds related to our disposition during 2008 of
one of the partnership interests (discussed below),
$4.0 million from the disposition of our interest in a
group purchasing organization (discussed further below),
$6.1 million from our disposition of interests in
unconsolidated real estate partnerships and our share of gains
recognized by our unconsolidated partnerships on the sale of
real estate and $3.8 million related to various other
transactions.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized
$99.9 million in gains on disposition of unconsolidated
real estate and other, which primarily consisted of a
$98.4 million gain recognized on the disposal of our
interests in unconsolidated real estate partnerships that owned
two properties with 671 units.
Casualty
Loss Related to Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane
Ike
During 2008, Tropical Storm Fay and Hurricane Ike caused severe
damage to certain of our properties located primarily in Florida
and Texas, respectively. We incurred total losses of
approximately $33.9 million, including property damage
replacement costs and
clean-up
costs. After consideration of estimated third party insurance
proceeds and the noncontrolling interest partners share of
losses for consolidated real estate partnerships, the net effect
of these casualties on net income available to the
Partnerships common unitholders was a loss of
approximately $5.6 million.
Sale
of Interest in Group Purchasing Organization
During 2009, we sold our interest in an unconsolidated group
purchasing organization to an unrelated entity for
$5.9 million, resulting in the recognition of a gain on
sale of $4.0 million, which is included in gain on
disposition of unconsolidated real estate and other in our
consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This gain was partially offset by a
$1.0 million provision for income tax. We also have a note
receivable from another principal in the group purchasing
organization, which is collateralized by its equity interest in
the entity. In connection with the sale of our interest, we
reevaluated collectibility of the note receivable and reversed
$1.4 million of previously recognized impairment losses,
which is reflected in provision for losses on notes receivable,
net in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the
carrying amount of the note receivable, which is due for
repayment in 2010, totaled $1.6 million.
Restructuring
Costs
In connection with 2008 property sales and an expected reduction
in redevelopment and transactional activities, during the three
months ended December 31, 2008, we initiated an
organizational restructuring program that included reductions in
workforce and related costs, reductions in leased corporate
facilities and abandonment of certain redevelopment projects and
business pursuits. This restructuring effort resulted in a
restructuring charge of $22.8 million, which consisted of:
severance costs of $12.9 million; unrecoverable lease
obligations of $6.4 million related to space that we will
no longer use; and the write-off of deferred transaction costs
totaling $3.5 million associated with certain acquisitions
and redevelopment opportunities that we will no longer pursue.
We completed the workforce reductions by March 31, 2009.
During 2009, in connection with continued repositioning of our
portfolio, we completed additional organizational restructuring
activities that included reductions in workforce and related
costs and the abandonment of additional leased corporate
facilities and redevelopment projects.
Our 2009 restructuring activities resulted in a restructuring
charge of $11.2 million, which consisted of severance costs
and personnel related costs of $7.0 million; unrecoverable
lease obligations of $2.6 million related to space that we
I-47
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
will no longer use; the write-off of deferred costs totaling
$0.9 million associated with certain redevelopment
opportunities that we will no longer pursue; and
$0.7 million in other costs.
As of December 31, 2009, the remaining accruals associated
with our restructuring activity are $6.9 million for
estimated unrecoverable lease obligations, which will be paid
over the remaining terms of the affected leases, and
$4.7 million for severance and personnel related costs,
which are anticipated to be paid during the first quarter 2010.
Transactions
Involving VMS National Properties Joint Venture
In January 2007, VMS National Properties Joint Venture, or VMS,
a consolidated real estate partnership in which we held a 22%
equity interest, refinanced property loans secured by its 15
apartment properties. The existing loans had an aggregate
carrying amount of $110.0 million and an aggregate face
amount of $152.2 million. The $42.2 million difference
between the face amount and carrying amount resulted from a 1997
bankruptcy settlement in which the lender agreed to reduce the
principal amount of the loans subject to VMSs compliance
with the terms of the restructured loans. Because the reduction
in the loan amount was contingent on future compliance,
recognition of the inherent debt extinguishment gain was
deferred. Upon refinancing of the loans in January 2007, the
existing lender accepted the reduced principal amount in full
satisfaction of the loans, and VMS recognized the
$42.2 million debt extinguishment gain in earnings.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, VMS sold eight
properties to third parties for an aggregate gain of
$22.7 million. Additionally, VMS contributed its seven
remaining properties to wholly-owned subsidiaries of Aimco in
exchange for consideration totaling $230.1 million,
consisting primarily of cash of $21.3 million, common
OP Units with a fair value of $9.8 million, the
assumption of $168.0 million in property debt, and the
assumption of $30.9 million in mortgage participation
liabilities. This total consideration included
$50.7 million related to our 22% equity interest in VMS.
Exclusive of our share, the consideration paid for the seven
properties exceeded the carrying amount of the noncontrolling
interest in such properties by $44.9 million. This excess
consideration is reflected in our consolidated balance sheet as
an increase in the carrying amount of the seven properties.
In connection with VMSs sale of seven properties to our
wholly-owned subsidiaries, we issued 178,500 common
OP Units to the limited partners in VMS. As a limited
partner in VMS, we received approximately 123,400 common
OP Units, which we eliminate in our consolidated financial
statements. Common OP Units issued to unrelated limited
partners in VMS totaled 55,100 and had an aggregate fair value
of $3.0 million.
Approximately $32.7 million of the $42.2 million debt
extinguishment gain related to the property loans that were
secured by the eight properties sold to third parties and three
properties we acquired from VMS but subsequently sold and is
reported in discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The remaining $9.5 million portion
of the debt extinguishment gain related to the property loans
that were secured by the four VMS properties we purchased and
continue to own and is reported in our continuing operations as
gain on dispositions of unconsolidated real estate and other.
Although 78% of the equity interests in VMS were held by
unrelated noncontrolling partners, no noncontrolling interest
share of the gains on debt extinguishment and sale of the
properties was recognized in our earnings. As required by then
applicable GAAP, we had in prior years recognized the
noncontrolling partners share of VMS losses in excess of
the noncontrolling partners capital contributions. The
amounts of those previously recognized losses exceeded the
noncontrolling partners share of the gains on debt
extinguishment and sale of the properties; accordingly, no
noncontrolling interests in such gains have been recognized in
our earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the
aggregate effect of the gains on extinguishment of VMS debt and
sale of VMS properties was to decrease loss from continuing
operations attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders by $9.5 million ($0.09 per diluted unit) and
decrease net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders by $65.0 million ($0.62 per diluted unit).
During the three months ended December 31, 2007, VMS
distributed its remaining cash, consisting primarily of
undistributed proceeds from the sale of its 15 properties
(including properties sold to us). Of the $42.4 million of
cash distributed to the unrelated limited partners,
$21.3 million represents the cash consideration we
contributed in exchange for the purchase of seven properties and
is presented in purchases of partnership interests and other
assets in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The remainder of the cash
distributed to the unrelated limited partners is presented in
payment of distributions to noncontrolling interest in the
consolidated statement of cash flows.
I-48
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Palazzo
Joint Venture
In December 2007, we entered into a joint venture agreement with
a third party investor which provides for the co-ownership of
three multi-family properties with 1,382 units located in
West Los Angeles. Under the agreement, we contributed three
wholly-owned properties, The Palazzo at Park La Brea, The
Palazzo East at Park La Brea and The Villas at Park
La Brea to the partnership, which we refer to as Palazzo,
at a value of $726.0 million, or approximately $525,000 per
unit. Palazzo had existing property debt of approximately
$296.0 million and an implied equity value of approximately
$430.0 million. We received $202.0 million from the
investor in exchange for an approximate 47% interest in Palazzo,
of which approximately $7.9 million was used to fund
escrows for capital improvements and various operating
requirements. We own the remaining interests in Palazzo,
including a managing interest, and will operate the properties
in exchange for a property management fee and certain other fees
over the term of the partnership.
We determined Palazzo is a VIE and that we are the primary
beneficiary who should consolidate this partnership. We deferred
recognition of a gain on this transaction and recognized the
consideration received as an increase in noncontrolling
interests in consolidated real estate partnerships.
|
|
NOTE 4
|
Investments
in Unconsolidated Real Estate Partnerships
|
We owned general and limited partner interests in unconsolidated
real estate partnerships owning approximately 77, 85 and 94
properties at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. We acquired these interests through various
transactions, including large portfolio acquisitions and offers
to individual limited partners. Our total ownership interests in
these unconsolidated real estate partnerships typically ranges
from less than 1% to 50% and in some instances may exceed 50%.
The following table provides selected combined financial
information for the unconsolidated real estate partnerships in
which we had investments accounted for under the equity method
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
$
|
95,226
|
|
|
$
|
122,788
|
|
|
$
|
133,544
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
122,543
|
|
|
|
155,444
|
|
|
|
165,567
|
|
Secured and other notes payable
|
|
|
101,678
|
|
|
|
122,859
|
|
|
|
124,406
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
145,637
|
|
|
|
175,681
|
|
|
|
180,222
|
|
Partners deficit
|
|
|
(23,094
|
)
|
|
|
(20,237
|
)
|
|
|
(14,655
|
)
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
|
55,366
|
|
|
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
73,672
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
(34,497
|
)
|
|
|
(42,863
|
)
|
|
|
(45,998
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
(10,302
|
)
|
|
|
(12,640
|
)
|
|
|
(13,965
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(11,103
|
)
|
|
|
(17,182
|
)
|
|
|
(17,194
|
)
|
Gain on sale
|
|
|
8,482
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
6,622
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
(4,845
|
)
|
As a result of our acquisition of interests in unconsolidated
real estate partnerships at a cost in excess of the historical
carrying amount of the partnerships net assets, our
aggregate investment in these partnerships at December 31,
2009 and 2008 of $104.2 million and $117.9 million,
respectively, exceeds our share of the underlying historical
partners deficit of the partnerships by approximately
$108.4 million and $121.8 million, respectively.
I-49
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 5
|
Notes
Receivable
|
The following table summarizes our notes receivable at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Par value notes
|
|
$
|
11,353
|
|
|
$
|
20,862
|
|
|
$
|
32,215
|
|
|
$
|
18,855
|
|
|
$
|
19,253
|
|
|
$
|
38,108
|
|
Discounted notes
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
141,468
|
|
|
|
146,563
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
138,387
|
|
|
|
146,962
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
(37,061
|
)
|
|
|
(39,214
|
)
|
|
|
(4,863
|
)
|
|
|
(17,743
|
)
|
|
|
(22,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes receivable
|
|
$
|
14,295
|
|
|
$
|
125,269
|
|
|
$
|
139,564
|
|
|
$
|
22,567
|
|
|
$
|
139,897
|
|
|
$
|
162,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face value of discounted notes
|
|
$
|
37,709
|
|
|
$
|
155,848
|
|
|
$
|
193,557
|
|
|
$
|
39,333
|
|
|
$
|
148,790
|
|
|
$
|
188,123
|
|
Included in notes receivable from unconsolidated real estate
partnerships at December 31, 2009 and 2008, are
$2.4 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in notes
that were secured by interests in real estate or interests in
real estate partnerships. We earn interest on these secured
notes receivable at various annual interest rates averaging
12.0%.
Included in the notes receivable from non-affiliates at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, are $102.2 million and
$95.8 million, respectively, in notes that were secured by
interests in real estate or interests in real estate
partnerships. We earn interest on these secured notes receivable
at various annual interest rates ranging between 4.0% and 12.0%
and averaging 4.7%.
Notes receivable from non-affiliates at December 31, 2009
and 2008, include notes receivable totaling $87.4 million
and $85.6 million, respectively, from 31 entities (the
borrowers) that are wholly owned by a single
individual. We originated these notes in November 2006 pursuant
to a loan agreement that provides for total funding of
approximately $110.0 million, including $16.4 million
for property improvements and an interest reserve, of which
$4.6 million had not been funded as of December 31,
2009. The notes mature in November 2016, bear interest at LIBOR
plus 2.0%, are partially guaranteed by the owner of the
borrowers, and are collateralized by second mortgages on 87
buildings containing 1,597 residential units and 42 commercial
spaces in West Harlem, New York City. In conjunction with the
loan agreement, we entered into a purchase option and put
agreement with the borrowers under which we may purchase some or
all of the buildings and, subject to achieving specified
increases in rental income, the borrowers may require us to
purchase the buildings (see Note 8). We determined that the
stated interest rate on the notes on the date the loan was
originated was a below-market interest rate and recorded a
$19.4 million discount to reflect the estimated fair value
of the notes based on an estimated market interest rate of LIBOR
plus 4.0%. The discount was determined to be attributable to our
real estate purchase option, which we recorded separately in
other assets. Accretion of this discount, which is included in
interest income in our consolidated statements of income,
totaled $0.9 million in 2009, $0.7 million in 2008 and
$1.9 million in 2007, inclusive of a $1.5 million
adjustment of accretion recognized upon the repayment of a
portion of the outstanding principal balance in 2007. The value
of the purchase option asset will be included in the cost of
properties acquired pursuant to the option or otherwise be
charged to expense. We determined that the borrowers are VIEs
and, based on qualitative and quantitative analysis, determined
that the individual who owns the borrowers and partially
guarantees the notes is the primary beneficiary.
As part of the March 2002 acquisition of Casden Properties,
Inc., we invested $50.0 million for a 20% passive interest
in Casden Properties LLC, an entity organized to acquire,
re-entitle and develop land parcels in Southern California.
Based upon the profit allocation agreement, we account for this
investment as a note receivable and through 2008 were amortizing
the discounted value of the investment to the $50.0 million
previously estimated to be collectible, through January 2,
2009, the initial dissolution date of the entity. In 2009, the
managing member extended the dissolution date. In connection
with the preparation of our 2008 annual financial statements and
as a result of a decline in land values in Southern California,
we determined our recorded investment amount was not fully
recoverable, and accordingly recognized an impairment loss of
$16.3 million ($10.0 million net of tax) during the
three months ended December 31, 2008. In connection with
the preparation of our 2009 annual financial statements and as a
result of continued declines in land values in Southern
California, we determined our then recorded investment amount
was not fully recoverable, and accordingly recognized an
impairment loss of $20.7 million ($12.4 million net of
tax) during the three months ended December 31, 2009.
Interest income from total non-impaired par value and certain
discounted notes for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 totaled $5.7 million, $7.8 million and
$11.7 million, respectively. For the years ended
December 31,
I-50
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized accretion income on certain
discounted notes of $0.1 million, $1.4 million and
$8.1 million, respectively.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses in total for both
par value notes and discounted notes for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
(22,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,435
|
)
|
Provisions for losses on notes receivable
|
|
|
(2,231
|
)
|
|
|
(1,673
|
)
|
Recoveries of losses on notes receivable
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Provisions for impairment loss on investment in Casden
Properties LLC
|
|
|
(20,740
|
)
|
|
|
(16,321
|
)
|
Net reductions due to consolidation of real estate partnerships
and property dispositions
|
|
|
4,941
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
(39,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we
determined that an allowance for loan losses of
$1.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively, was
required on certain of our par value notes that had carrying
amounts of $3.8 million and $11.4 million,
respectively. The average recorded investment in the impaired
par value notes for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, was $7.6 million and $9.0 million, respectively.
The remaining $28.4 million in par value notes receivable
at December 31, 2009, is estimated to be collectible and,
therefore, interest income on these par value notes is
recognized as it is earned.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we determined that an
allowance for loan losses of $1.0 million and
$2.7 million, respectively, was required on certain of our
discounted notes (excluding the note related to Casden
Properties LLC discussed above) that had carrying values of
$1.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The
average recorded investment in the impaired discounted notes for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, was
$3.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
Property
Tax-Exempt Bond Financings, Property Loans Payable and Other
Borrowings
|
The following table summarizes our property tax-exempt bond
financings related to properties classified as held for use at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the majority of which is
non-recourse to us (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Fixed rate property tax-exempt bonds payable
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
$
|
140,995
|
|
|
$
|
131,530
|
|
Variable rate property tax-exempt bonds payable
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
433,931
|
|
|
|
497,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
574,926
|
|
|
$
|
629,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate property tax-exempt bonds payable mature at various
dates through December 2049. Variable rate property tax-exempt
bonds payable mature at various dates through June 2038.
Principal and interest on these bonds are generally payable in
semi-annual installments with balloon payments due at maturity.
Certain of our property tax-exempt bonds at December 31,
2009, are remarketed periodically by a remarketing agent to
maintain a variable yield. If the remarketing agent is unable to
remarket the bonds, then the remarketing agent can put the bonds
to us. We believe that the likelihood of this occurring is
remote. At December 31, 2009, our property tax-exempt bond
financings related to properties classified as held for use were
secured by 39 properties with a combined net book value of
$837.7 million. As discussed in Note 2, certain fixed
rate property tax-exempt bonds payable have been converted to
variable rates using total rate of return swaps and are
presented above as variable rate debt at their carrying amounts,
or fair value.
I-51
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes our property loans payable
related to properties classified as held for use at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the majority of which are
non-recourse to us (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Fixed rate property notes payable
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,712,744
|
|
|
$
|
4,524,322
|
|
Variable rate property notes payable
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
75,877
|
|
|
|
223,561
|
|
Secured notes credit facility
|
|
|
1.02
|
%
|
|
|
34,544
|
|
|
|
46,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,823,165
|
|
|
$
|
4,794,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate property notes payable mature at various dates
through August 2053. Variable rate property notes payable mature
at various dates through November 2030. Principal and interest
are generally payable monthly or in monthly interest-only
payments with balloon payments due at maturity. At
December 31, 2009, our property notes payable related to
properties classified as held for use were secured by 347
properties with a combined net book value of
$5,864.1 million. As discussed in Note 2, certain
fixed rate secured notes payable have been converted to variable
rates using total rate of return swaps and are presented above
as variable rate debt at their carrying amounts, or fair value.
At December 31, 2009, we had a secured revolving credit
facility with a major life company that provided for borrowings
of up to $200.0 million. In January 2010, the credit
facility was modified to reduce allowed borrowings to the then
outstanding amount of $46.3 million. The primary function
of the facility is to secure short-term fully pre-payable
non-recourse loans for a period of less than three years. The
interest rate on the notes provided through the facility is
30-day LIBOR
plus 0.78%. Each loan under the facility is treated as a
separate borrowing and is secured by a specific property. None
of the facility loans are cross-collateralized or
cross-defaulted. This facility matures in October 2010, and has
two one-year extension options for a $500,000 fee per extension.
At December 31, 2009, outstanding borrowings of
$34.5 million related to properties classified as held for
use are included in 2012 maturities below based on the extension
options.
Our consolidated debt instruments generally contain covenants
common to the type of facility or borrowing, including financial
covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and
maximum leverage ratios. At December 31, 2009, we were in
compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our
consolidated debt instruments.
Other borrowings totaled $53.1 million and
$96.0 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. At December 31, 2009, other borrowings
includes $44.6 million in fixed rate obligations with
interest rates ranging from zero to 10.0% and $8.5 million
in variable rate obligations bearing interest at the prime rate
plus 1.75%. The maturity dates for other borrowings range from
2010 to 2039, although certain amounts are due upon occurrence
of specified events, such as property sales.
As of December 31, 2009, the scheduled principal
amortization and maturity payments for our property tax-exempt
bonds, property notes payable and other borrowings related to
properties in continuing operations are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
97,609
|
|
|
$
|
3,349
|
|
|
$
|
100,958
|
|
2011
|
|
|
102,274
|
|
|
|
237,796
|
|
|
|
340,070
|
|
2012
|
|
|
105,391
|
|
|
|
205,705
|
|
|
|
311,096
|
|
2013
|
|
|
104,892
|
|
|
|
369,210
|
|
|
|
474,102
|
|
2014
|
|
|
102,101
|
|
|
|
267,544
|
|
|
|
369,645
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,855,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,451,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
|
Term
Loans and Credit Facility
|
We have an Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement,
as amended, with a syndicate of financial institutions, which we
refer to as the Credit Agreement. In addition to us, Aimco and
an Aimco subsidiary are also borrowers under the Credit
Agreement.
I-52
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2009, the Credit Agreement consisted of
aggregate commitments of $270.0 million, comprised of the
$90.0 million outstanding balance on the term loan and
$180.0 million of revolving loan commitments. The term loan
bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%, or at our option, a base rate
equal to the prime rate, and matures March 2011. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a
pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 4.25%
with a LIBOR floor of 2.00% or, at our option, a base rate equal
to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.00%). The revolving credit
facility matures May 1, 2011, and may be extended for an
additional year, subject to certain conditions, including
payment of a 45.0 basis point fee on the total revolving
commitments and repayment of the remaining term loan balance by
February 1, 2011. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, while
any balance under the term loan is outstanding, repurchases of
our Common Stock are permitted with 50% of net asset sale
proceeds if the other 50% of such net asset sale proceeds are
applied to repay the term loan. The Credit Agreement permits us
to increase revolving commitments by up to $320.0 million,
subject to our obtaining such commitments from eligible lenders.
The Credit Agreement includes customary financial covenants,
including the maintenance of specified ratios with respect to
total indebtedness to gross asset value, total secured
indebtedness to gross asset value, aggregate recourse
indebtedness to gross asset value, variable rate debt to total
indebtedness, debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage;
the maintenance of a minimum adjusted tangible net worth; and
limitations regarding the amount of cross-collateralized debt.
The Credit Agreement includes other customary covenants,
including a restriction on distributions and other restricted
payments, but permits distributions during any four consecutive
fiscal quarters in an aggregate amount of up to 95% of our funds
from operations for such period, subject to certain non-cash
adjustments, or such amount as may be necessary to maintain
Aimcos REIT status. We were in compliance with all such
covenants as of December 31, 2009.
The lenders under the Credit Agreement may accelerate any
outstanding loans if, among other things: we fail to make
payments when due (subject to applicable grace periods);
material defaults occur under other debt agreements; certain
bankruptcy or insolvency events occur; material judgments are
entered against us; we fail to comply with certain covenants,
such as the requirement to deliver financial information or the
requirement to provide notices regarding material events
(subject to applicable grace periods in some cases);
indebtedness is incurred in violation of the covenants; or
prohibited liens arise.
At December 31, 2009, the term loan had an outstanding
principal balance of $90.0 million and an interest rate of
1.73%. We repaid $45.0 million of the term loan through
February 26, 2010, leaving a remaining outstanding balance
of $45.0 million. At December 31, 2009, we had no
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The
amount available under the revolving credit facility at
December 31, 2009, was $136.2 million (after giving
effect to $43.8 million outstanding for undrawn letters of
credit issued under the revolving credit facility). The proceeds
of revolving loans are generally permitted to be used to fund
working capital and for other corporate purposes.
On February 3, 2010, we entered into an Eighth Amendment to
our Credit Agreement, which provides for a reduction in the
minimum threshold for our debt service coverage and fixed charge
coverage ratios and an increase in the maximum threshold for our
secured indebtedness ratio.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
In connection with our redevelopment and capital improvement
activities, we have commitments of approximately
$4.8 million related to construction projects that are
expected to be completed during 2010. Additionally, we enter
into certain commitments for future purchases of goods and
services in connection with the operations of our properties.
Those commitments generally have terms of one year or less and
reflect expenditure levels comparable to our historical
expenditures.
As discussed in Note 5, we have committed to fund an
additional $4.6 million in loans on certain properties in
West Harlem in New York City. In certain circumstances, the
obligor under these notes has the ability to put properties to
us, which would result in a cash payment between $30.0 and
$97.5 million and the assumption of approximately $119.0
million in property debt. The ability to exercise the put and
the amount of cash payment required upon exercise is dependent
upon the achievement of specified thresholds by the current
owner of the properties.
As discussed in Note 11, we have a potential obligation to
repurchase $30.0 million in liquidation preference of our
Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership
Preferred Units for $21.0 million.
I-53
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Tax
Credit Arrangements
We are required to manage certain consolidated real estate
partnerships in compliance with various laws, regulations and
contractual provisions that apply to our historic and low-income
housing tax credit syndication arrangements. In some instances,
noncompliance with applicable requirements could result in
projected tax benefits not being realized and require a refund
or reduction of investor capital contributions, which are
reported as deferred income in our consolidated balance sheet,
until such time as our obligation to deliver tax benefits is
relieved. The remaining compliance periods for our tax credit
syndication arrangements range from less than one year to
15 years. We do not anticipate that any material refunds or
reductions of investor capital contributions will be required in
connection with these arrangements.
Legal
Matters
In addition to the matters described below, we are a party to
various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of business, some of which are covered by
our general liability insurance program, and none of which we
expect to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Limited
Partnerships
In connection with our acquisitions of interests in real estate
partnerships and our role as general partner in certain real
estate partnerships, we are sometimes subject to legal actions,
including allegations that such activities may involve breaches
of fiduciary duties to the partners of such real estate
partnerships or violations of the relevant partnership
agreements. We may incur costs in connection with the defense or
settlement of such litigation. We believe that we comply with
our fiduciary obligations and relevant partnership agreements.
Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, we do not
expect any such legal actions to have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or
operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal
or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a
property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew
of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the
hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage
or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect
occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to
sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs
associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by
government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by
such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous
substances on a property could result in claims by private
plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other
infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of
removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through
a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges
for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is
potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose
liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal
ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with
the ownership, operation and management of properties, we could
potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs
associated with our properties or properties we acquire or
manage in the future.
We have determined that our legal obligations to remove or
remediate hazardous substances may be conditional asset
retirement obligations, as defined in GAAP. Except in limited
circumstances where the asset retirement activities are expected
to be performed in connection with a planned construction
project or property casualty, we believe that the fair value of
our asset retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated
due to significant uncertainties in the timing and manner of
settlement of those obligations. Asset retirement obligations
that are reasonably estimable as of December 31, 2009, are
immaterial to our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
Mold
Aimco has been named as a defendant in lawsuits that have
alleged personal injury and property damage as a result of the
presence of mold. In addition, we are aware of lawsuits against
owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims
of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of
mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary
judgments or settlements. We have only limited insurance
coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the
presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold
exposure. We have implemented policies, procedures, third-party
audits and training, and include a detailed moisture intrusion
and mold assessment during
I-54
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
acquisition due diligence. We believe these measures will
prevent or eliminate mold exposure from our properties and will
minimize the effects that mold may have on our residents. To
date, we have not incurred any material costs or liabilities
relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.
Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to
change, we can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from
the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
Operating
Leases
We are obligated under office space and equipment non-cancelable
operating leases. In addition, we sublease certain of our office
space to tenants under non-cancelable subleases. Approximate
minimum annual rentals under operating leases and approximate
minimum payments to be received under annual subleases are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Sublease
|
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
7,345
|
|
|
$
|
818
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,056
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,888
|
|
|
$
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the office space subject to the operating
leases described above are for the use of our corporate offices
and area operations. Rent expense recognized totaled
$7.7 million, $10.2 million and $9.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Sublease receipts that offset rent expense totaled
approximately $0.7 million, $0.7 million and
$1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
As discussed in Note 3, during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we commenced restructuring
activities pursuant to which we vacated certain leased office
space for which we remain obligated. In connection with the
restructurings, we accrued amounts representing the estimated
fair value of certain lease obligations related to space we are
no longer using, reduced by estimated sublease amounts. At
December 31, 2009, approximately $6.9 million related
to the above operating lease obligations was included in accrued
liabilities related to these estimates.
I-55
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities of the taxable REIT subsidiaries for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities and
assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership differences
|
|
$
|
32,565
|
|
|
$
|
47,635
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
|
|
2,477
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
14,862
|
|
|
|
7,757
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
49,901
|
|
|
$
|
57,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating, capital and other loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
37,164
|
|
|
$
|
7,183
|
|
Provision for impairments on real estate assets
|
|
|
33,321
|
|
|
|
33,321
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
3,094
|
|
|
|
5,530
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
9,272
|
|
|
|
23,504
|
|
Accrued interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
Intangibles management contracts
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
6,949
|
|
|
|
8,521
|
|
Equity compensation
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
Other
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
94,103
|
|
|
|
86,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
$
|
42,015
|
|
|
$
|
28,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, we determined a valuation
allowance for our deferred tax assets was necessary for certain
state net operating losses based on a determination that it was
more likely than not that such assets will not be realized prior
to their expiration.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of our
unrecognized tax benefits is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
3,080
|
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
$
|
3,118
|
|
Reductions as a result of the lapse of applicable statutes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the prior year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions related to the prior year
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
3,079
|
|
|
$
|
3,080
|
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not anticipate any material changes in existing
unrecognized tax benefits during the next 12 months.
Because the statute of limitations has not yet elapsed, our
Federal income tax returns for the year ended December 31,
2006, and subsequent years and certain of our State income tax
returns for the year ended December 31, 2004, and
subsequent years are currently subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service or other tax authorities. As discussed
in Note 2, the IRS has issued us summary reports including
its proposed adjustments to the Aimco Operating
Partnerships 2007 and 2006 Federal tax returns. We do not
expect the proposed adjustments to have any material effect on
our unrecognized tax benefits, financial condition or results of
operations. Our policy is to include interest and penalties
related to income taxes in income taxes in our consolidated
statements of income.
In accordance with the accounting requirements for stock-based
compensation, our deferred tax assets at December 31, 2008,
are net of $3.6 million of excess tax benefits from
employee stock option exercises and vested restricted
I-56
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stock awards. As of December 31, 2009, we had no such
excess tax benefits from employee stock option exercises and
vested restricted stock awards.
The cost of land and depreciable property, net of accumulated
depreciation, for federal income tax purposes was approximately
$4.6 billion.
Significant components of the provision (benefit) for income
taxes are as follows and are classified within income tax
benefit in continuing operations and income from discontinued
operations, net in our statements of income for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,678
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
State
|
|
|
3,992
|
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
11,093
|
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(17,320
|
)
|
|
|
(22,115
|
)
|
|
|
(17,816
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(3,988
|
)
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
|
(1,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(21,308
|
)
|
|
|
(24,501
|
)
|
|
|
(19,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit
|
|
$
|
(19,226
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(18,669
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,795
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(557
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
Consolidated losses subject to tax, consisting of pretax income
or loss of our taxable REIT subsidiaries and gains or loss on
certain property sales that are subject to income tax under
section 1374 of the Internal Revenue Code, for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 totaled
$40.6 million, $81.8 million and $41.5 million,
respectively. The reconciliation of income tax attributable to
continuing and discontinued operations computed at the
U.S. statutory rate to income tax benefit is shown below
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Tax at U.S. statutory rates on consolidated loss subject to tax
|
|
$
|
(14,221
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(28,632
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(14,508
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income tax, net of Federal tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,183
|
)
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Effect of permanent differences
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Tax effect of intercompany transfers of assets between the REIT
and taxable REIT subsidiaries(1)
|
|
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
15,059
|
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of excess tax basis
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,226
|
)
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(13,408
|
)
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
(17,691
|
)
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the effect of assets contributed by us to taxable REIT
subsidiaries, for which deferred tax expense or benefit was
recognized upon the sale or impairment of the asset by the
taxable REIT subsidiary. |
Income taxes paid totaled approximately $4.6 million,
$13.8 million and $3.0 million in the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
At December 31, 2009, we had net operating loss
carryforwards, or NOLs, of approximately $60.6 million for
income tax purposes that expire in years 2027 to 2029. Subject
to certain separate return limitations, we may use these NOLs to
offset all or a portion of taxable income generated by our
taxable REIT subsidiaries. We generated approximately
$45.9 million of NOLs during the year ended
December 31, 2009, as a result of losses from our taxable
REIT subsidiaries. The deductibility of intercompany interest
expense with our taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to certain
intercompany limitations based upon taxable income as required
under Section 163(j) of the Code. As of December 31,
2009, interest
I-57
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
carryovers of approximately $24.6 million, limited by
Section 163(j) of the Code, are available against
U.S. Federal tax without expiration. The deferred tax asset
related to these interest carryovers is approximately
$9.6 million. Additionally, our low-income housing and
rehabilitation tax credit carryforwards as of December 31,
2009, were approximately $7.4 million for income tax
purposes that expire in years 2012 to 2028.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
Notes
Receivable from Aimco
|
In exchange for the sale of certain real estate assets to Aimco
in December 2000, we received notes receivable, totaling
$10.1 million. The notes bear interest at the rate of 5.7%
per annum. Of the $10.1 million total, $7.6 million is
due upon demand, and the remainder is due in scheduled
semi-annual payments with all unpaid principal and interest due
on December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2009 and 2008,
the balance of the notes totaled $16.4 million and $15.6,
respectively, which includes accrued and unpaid interest.
|
|
NOTE 11
|
Partners
Capital and Redeemable Preferred Units
|
Preferred
OP Units Owned by Aimco
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had the following classes
of preferred OP Units owned by Aimco outstanding (stated at
their redemption values):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate per Share
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
(Paid
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Perpetual:
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
|
Quarterly)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Class G Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value,
4,050,000 units authorized, 4,050,000 units issued and
outstanding(2)
|
|
|
07/15/2008
|
|
|
|
9.3750
|
%
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
|
$
|
101,000
|
|
Class T Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value,
6,000,000 units authorized, 6,000,000 units issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
07/31/2008
|
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Class U Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value,
8,000,000 units authorized, 8,000,000 units issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
03/24/2009
|
|
|
|
7.750
|
%
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Class V Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value,
3,450,000 units authorized, 3,450,000 units issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
09/29/2009
|
|
|
|
8.000
|
%
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
Class Y Partnership Preferred Units, $0.01 par value,
3,450,000 units authorized, 3,450,000 units issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
12/21/2009
|
|
|
|
7.875
|
%
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership
Preferred Units, $0.01 par value per unit, 240 units
authorized, 134 and 146 units issued and outstanding(3)
|
|
|
06/30/2011
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
67,000
|
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
690,500
|
|
|
$
|
696,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less preferred units subject to repurchase agreement(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
660,500
|
|
|
$
|
696,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All classes of preferred units are redeemable by the Partnership
only in connection with a concurrent redemption by Aimco of the
corresponding preferred Aimco equity held by unrelated parties.
All classes of Aimcos corresponding preferred stock are
redeemable at Aimcos option on and after the dates
specified. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes 10,000 units held by a consolidated subsidiary
that are eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
During 2006, Aimco sold 200 shares of its Series A
Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value per share, or the CRA Preferred Stock, with
a liquidation preference of $500,000 per share, for net proceeds
of $97.5 million. The Series A Community Reinvestment
Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units, or the CRA Preferred
Units, have substantially the same terms as the CRA Preferred
Stock. Holders of the CRA Preferred |
I-58
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Units are entitled to cumulative cash dividends payable
quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30,
September 30, and December 31 of each year, when and as
declared, beginning on September 30, 2006. For the period
from the date of original issuance through March 31, 2015,
the distribution rate is a variable rate per annum equal to the
Three-Month LIBOR Rate (as defined in the articles supplementary
designating the CRA Preferred Stock) plus 1.25%, calculated as
of the beginning of each quarterly dividend period. The rate at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, was 1.54% and 5.01%,
respectively. Upon liquidation, holders of the CRA Preferred
Units are entitled to a preference of $500,000 per share, plus
an amount equal to accumulated, accrued and unpaid
distributions, whether or not earned or declared. The CRA
Preferred Units rank prior to our common OP Units and on the
same level as our other OP preferred Units, with respect to the
payment of distributions and the distribution of amounts upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The CRA Preferred Units
are not redeemable prior to June 30, 2011, except in
limited circumstances related to Aimcos REIT
qualification. On and after June 30, 2011, the CRA
Preferred Units are redeemable for cash, in whole or from time
to time in part, upon the redemption, at Aimcos option, of
its CRA Preferred Stock at a price per share equal to the
liquidation preference, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid
dividends, if any, to the redemption date. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
In June 2009, Aimco entered into an agreement to repurchase
$36.0 million in liquidation preference of its CRA
Preferred Stock at a 30% discount to the liquidation preference.
Pursuant to this agreement, in June 2009, Aimco repurchased
12 shares, or $6.0 million in liquidation preference,
of CRA Preferred Stock for $4.2 million, and the holder of
the CRA Preferred Stock may require Aimco to repurchase an
additional 60 shares, or $30.0 million in liquidation
preference, of CRA Preferred Stock over the next three years,
for $21.0 million. Concurrent with Aimcos repurchase
of 12 shares, we repurchased from Aimco an equivalent
number of our CRA Preferred Units. If required, these additional
repurchases will be for up to $10.0 million in liquidation
preference in May 2010, 2011 and 2012. Upon any repurchases
required of Aimco under this agreement, we will repurchase from
Aimco an equivalent number of our CRA Preferred Units. Based on
the holders ability to require Aimco to repurchase an
additional 60 shares of CRA Preferred Stock pursuant to
this agreement and our obligation to purchase from Aimco a
corresponding number of our CRA Preferred Units,
$30.0 million in liquidation preference of CRA Preferred
Units, or the maximum redemption value of such preferred units,
is classified as part of redeemable preferred units within
temporary capital in our consolidation balance sheet at
December 31, 2009. |
In connection with our June 2009 CRA Preferred Units repurchase
discussed above, we reflected the $1.8 million excess of
the carrying value over the repurchase price, offset by
$0.2 million of issuance costs previously recorded as a
reduction of partners capital, as a reduction of net
income attributable to preferred unitholders for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
During 2008, Aimco repurchased 54 shares, or
$27.0 million in liquidation preference, of its CRA
Preferred Stock, for cash totaling $24.8 million.
Concurrent with this redemption, we repurchased from Aimco an
equivalent number of outstanding CRA Preferred Units. We
reflected the $2.2 million excess of the carrying value
over the redemption price, offset by $0.7 million of
issuance costs previously recorded as a reduction of
partners capital, is reflected as a reduction of net
income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders for purposes of calculating earnings per unit for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
All classes of preferred OP Units are pari passu with each
other and are senior to the common OP Units. None of the
classes of preferred OP Units have any voting rights,
except the right to approve certain changes to the Partnership
Agreement that would adversely affect holders of such class of
units. Distributions on all preferred OP Units are subject
to being declared by the General Partner. All of the above
outstanding classes of preferred units have a liquidation
preference per unit of $25, with the exception of the CRA
Preferred Units, which have a liquidation preference per unit of
$500,000.
I-59
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Redeemable
Preferred OP Units
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the following classes of
preferred OP Units (stated at their redemption values)
owned by third parties were outstanding (in thousands, except
unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Class One Partnership Preferred Units, 90,000 units
issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one
year following issuance, holder to receive distributions at
8.75% ($8.00 per annum per unit)
|
|
$
|
8,229
|
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
Class Two Partnership Preferred Units, 23,700 and
44,050 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the
holders option one year following issuance, holders to receive
distributions at 5.9% ($1.48 per annum per unit)
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
Class Three Partnership Preferred Units, 1,371,451 and
1,419,316 units issued and outstanding, redeemable at the
holders option one year following issuance, holders to receive
distributions at 7.88% ($1.97 per annum per unit)
|
|
|
34,286
|
|
|
|
35,483
|
|
Class Four Partnership Preferred Units, 755,999 units
issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one
year following issuance, holders to receive distributions at
8.0% ($2.00 per annum per unit)
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
Class Five Partnership Preferred Units, 68,671 units
issued and outstanding, redeemable for cash at any time at our
option, holder to receive distributions equal to the per unit
distribution on the common OP Units(1)
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
Class Six Partnership Preferred Units, 802,453 units
issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one
year following issuance, holder to receive distributions at 8.5%
($2.125 per annum per unit)
|
|
|
20,061
|
|
|
|
20,061
|
|
Class Seven Partnership Preferred Units, 27,960 units
issued and outstanding, redeemable at the holders option one
year following issuance, holder to receive distributions at 9.5%
($2.375 per annum per unit)
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units, 6,250 units
issued and outstanding, redeemable for cash at any time at our
option, holder to receive distributions equal to the per unit
distribution on the common OP Units(1)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
85,671
|
|
|
$
|
88,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holders of the Class Five and Class Eight Partnership
Preferred Units received the per unit special distributions
discussed below in addition to the regular distributions
received by common OP unitholders during 2009 and 2008. |
The Class One, Class Two, Class Three,
Class Four, Class Six and Class Seven preferred
OP Units are redeemable, at the holders option. We,
at our sole discretion, may settle such redemption requests in
cash or shares of Aimcos Class A Common Stock in a
value equal to the redemption preference. In the event we
require Aimco to issue shares to settle a redemption request, we
would issue to Aimco a corresponding number of common
OP Units. During 2008, we established a redemption policy
that requires cash settlement of redemption requests for the
redeemable preferred OP Units, subject to limited
exceptions. Accordingly, these redeemable units are classified
as redeemable preferred units within temporary capital in our
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
based on the expectation that we will cash settle these units.
For any preferred OP Units that are redeemed for Aimco
Class A Common Stock, upon redemption, we will issue a
common OP Unit to Aimco for each share of Aimco
Class A Common Stock issued. In addition, subject to
certain conditions, the Class Four, Class Five,
Class Six and Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units
are convertible into common OP Units.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
approximately 68,200 and 38,400 preferred OP Units,
respectively, were tendered for redemption in exchange for cash.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, no
preferred OP Units were tendered for redemption in exchange
for shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock.
I-60
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents a reconciliation of redeemable
preferred units classified within temporary capital for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at January
|
|
$
|
88,148
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net income attributable to redeemable preferred units
|
|
|
6,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred units
|
|
|
(6,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of preferred units
|
|
|
(1,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of redeemable preferred units from
partners capital
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
88,148
|
|
Other
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
116,656
|
|
|
$
|
88,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The distributions paid on each class of preferred OP Units
classified as partners capital in the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and, in the case of the
redeemable preferred OP Units discussed above, classified
in temporary capital as of December 31, 2009, are as
follows (in thousands, except per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Class of Preferred OP Units
|
|
Unit(1)
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
Unit(1)
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
Unit(1)
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
Class G
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
9,492
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
9,492
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
9,492
|
|
Class T
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Class U
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
Class V
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
Class W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
(2)
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
Class Y
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
Series A CRA
|
|
|
10,841
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
24,381
|
(4)
|
|
|
4,531
|
|
|
|
41,661
|
|
|
|
8,316
|
|
Class One
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
Class Two
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Class Three
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
Class Four
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
Class Five
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Class Six
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
Class Seven
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Class Eight
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts per unit are calculated based on the number of preferred
units outstanding either at the end of each year or as of
conversion or redemption date, as noted. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For the period from January 1, 2007, to the date of
redemption. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amount per unit based on 134 units outstanding for the
entire period. 12 units were repurchased in June 2009 and
received $6,509 in dividends through the date of purchase. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Amount per unit is based on 146 units outstanding for the
entire period. 54 units were repurchased in
September 2008 and received $17,980 in dividends through
the date of purchase. |
Common
OP Units
Common OP Units are redeemable by common
OP Unitholders (other than the General Partner and Special
Limited Partner) at their option, subject to certain
restrictions, on the basis of one common OP Unit for either
one share of Aimco Class A Common Stock or cash equal to
the fair value of a share of Aimco Class A Common Stock at
the time of redemption. We have the option to require Aimco to
deliver shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock in exchange
for all or any portion of the cash requested. When a Limited
Partner redeems a common OP Unit for Aimco Class A
Common
I-61
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock, Limited Partners Capital is reduced and Special
Limited Partners capital is increased. Common
OP Units held by Aimco are not redeemable.
In December 2008, October 2008, July 2008, and December 2007, we
declared special distributions payable on January 29, 2009,
December 1, 2008, August 29, 2008 and January 30,
2008, respectively, to holders of record of common OP Units
and High Performance Units on December 29, 2008,
October 27, 2008, July 28, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively. The special distributions were paid on
common OP Units and High Performance Units in the amounts
listed below. We distributed to Aimco common OP Units equal
to the number of shares we issued pursuant to Aimcos
corresponding special dividends in addition to approximately
$0.60 per unit in cash. Holders of common OP Units other
than Aimco and holders of High Performance Units received the
distribution entirely in cash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
January 2008
|
|
Aimco Operating Partnership Special
|
|
Special
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
Special
|
|
Distributions
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
Distribution per unit
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
Total distribution
|
|
$
|
230.1 million
|
|
|
$
|
176.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
285.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
257.2 million
|
|
Common OP Units and High Performance Units outstanding on record
date
|
|
|
110,654,142
|
|
|
|
98,136,520
|
|
|
|
95,151,333
|
|
|
|
102,478,510
|
|
Common OP Units held by Aimco
|
|
|
101,169,951
|
|
|
|
88,650,980
|
|
|
|
85,619,144
|
|
|
|
92,795,891
|
|
Total distribution on Aimco common OP Units
|
|
$
|
210.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
159.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
256.9 million
|
|
|
$
|
232.9 million
|
|
Cash distribution to Aimco
|
|
$
|
60.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
53.2 million
|
|
|
$
|
51.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
55.0 million
|
|
Portion of distribution paid to Aimco through issuance of common
OP Units
|
|
$
|
149.8 million
|
|
|
$
|
106.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
205.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
177.9 million
|
|
Common OP Units issued to Aimco pursuant to distributions
|
|
|
15,627,330
|
|
|
|
12,572,267
|
|
|
|
5,731,310
|
|
|
|
4,594,074
|
|
Cash distributed to common OP Unit and High Performance Unit
holders other than Aimco
|
|
$
|
19.7 million
|
|
|
$
|
17.0 million
|
|
|
$
|
28.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
24.3 million
|
|
As discussed in Note 2, during December 2009, we adopted
the provisions of ASU
2010-01,
which relate to accounting for dividends with components of cash
and stock. In prior periods, we treated the shares of units
issued in our special distributions similar to stock
distributions, with a reclassification within consolidated
capital at the beginning of the earliest period presented. In
connection with our adoption of ASU
2010-01, we
retrospectively adjusted our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2008, by increasing accrued liabilities and
other by $149.0 million, representing the portion of our
special distributions declared in December 2008 that was paid in
January 2009 through the issuance of common OP Units.
Also in December 2008, October 2008, July 2008 and December
2007, Aimcos board of directors declared corresponding
special dividends payable on January 29, 2009,
December 1, 2008, August 29, 2008 and January 30,
2008, respectively, to holders of record of its Common Stock on
December 29, 2008, October 27, 2008, July 28,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. A portion of the
special dividends in the amounts of $0.60 per share represents
payment of the regular dividend for the quarters ended
December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008, June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and the remaining
amount per share represents an additional dividend associated
with taxable gains from
I-62
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
property dispositions. Portions of the special dividends were
paid through the issuance of shares of Aimco Class A Common
Stock. The table below summarizes information regarding these
special dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
January 2008
|
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
Special
|
|
|
Special
|
|
Aimco Special Dividends
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
Outstanding shares of Common Stock on the record date
|
|
|
101,169,951
|
|
|
|
88,650,980
|
|
|
|
85,619,144
|
|
|
|
92,795,891
|
|
Total dividend
|
|
$
|
210.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
159.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
256.9 million
|
|
|
$
|
232.9 million
|
|
Portion of dividend paid in cash
|
|
$
|
60.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
53.2 million
|
|
|
$
|
51.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
55.0 million
|
|
Portion of dividend paid through issuance of shares
|
|
$
|
149.8 million
|
|
|
$
|
106.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
205.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
177.9 million
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to dividend
|
|
|
15,627,330
|
|
|
|
12,572,267
|
|
|
|
5,731,310
|
|
|
|
4,594,074
|
|
Average share price on determination date
|
|
$
|
9.58
|
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
|
|
$
|
35.84
|
|
|
$
|
38.71
|
|
Amounts after elimination of the effects of shares of Common
Stock held by consolidated subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding shares of Common Stock on the record date
|
|
|
100,642,817
|
|
|
|
88,186,456
|
|
|
|
85,182,665
|
|
|
|
92,379,751
|
|
Total dividend
|
|
$
|
209.3 million
|
|
|
$
|
158.7 million
|
|
|
$
|
255.5 million
|
|
|
$
|
231.9 million
|
|
Portion of dividend paid in cash
|
|
$
|
60.3 million
|
|
|
$
|
52.9 million
|
|
|
$
|
51.1 million
|
|
|
$
|
54.8 million
|
|
Portion of dividend paid through issuance of shares
|
|
$
|
149.0 million
|
|
|
$
|
105.8 million
|
|
|
$
|
204.4 million
|
|
|
$
|
177.1 million
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to dividend
|
|
|
15,548,996
|
|
|
|
12,509,657
|
|
|
|
5,703,265
|
|
|
|
4,573,735
|
|
During 2008, Aimco issued approximately 17,000 shares of
Aimco Class A Common Stock to certain of its non-executive
officers who purchased the shares at market prices. In exchange
for the shares purchased, the officers executed notes payable
totaling $0.6 million. No shares were issued under similar
arrangements during 2009. These notes, which are 25% recourse to
the borrowers, have a
10-year
maturity and bear interest either at a fixed rate of 6% annually
or a floating rate based on the
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.85%, which is subject to an annual interest rate cap of
typically 7.25%. The notes were contributed by Aimco to us in
exchange for an equivalent number of common OP Units. Total
payments in 2009 and 2008 on all notes from officers were
$0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively. In 2009
and 2008, Aimco reacquired approximately 94,000 and
31,000 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock from
officers in exchange for the cancellation of related notes
totaling $1.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Concurrently, we reacquired from Aimco an equal number of common
OP Units.
In addition, in 2009 and 2008, Aimco issued approximately
378,000 and 225,000 restricted shares of Class A Common
Stock to certain officers and employees and we concurrently
issued a corresponding number of common OP Units to Aimco.
The restricted stock was recorded at the fair market value of
Aimco Class A Common Stock on the date of issuance. These
shares of restricted Aimco Class A Common Stock may not be
sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise
disposed of and are subject to a risk of forfeiture prior to the
expiration of the applicable vesting period (ratably over a
period of four years).
In 2008 and 2007, Aimco purchased in the open market
approximately 13.9 million and 7.5 million shares of
Aimco Class A Common Stock, respectively, at an average
price per share of approximately $34.02 and $43.70,
respectively. Concurrent with Aimcos repurchases of Aimco
Class A Common Stock in 2008 and 2007, we repurchased from
Aimco a corresponding number of common OP Units at prices
per unit equal to the prices per share paid by Aimco to
repurchase such shares. During 2009, Aimco did not repurchase
any shares of Class A Common Stock on the open market.
In 2007, we completed tender offers for limited partnership
interests resulting in the issuance of approximately 55,400
common OP Units. Approximately 55,100 of the common
OP Units issued in 2007 were to unrelated limited partners
in VMS in connection with our purchase of seven properties from
the partnership, as discussed in Note 3. In 2009 and 2008,
we did not issue a significant number of common OP Units in
connection with tender offers for limited partners.
I-63
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
approximately 64,000 and 50,000 common OP Units,
respectively, were redeemed in exchange for cash, and
approximately 519,000 and 114,000 common OP Units,
respectively, were redeemed in exchange for shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock.
High
Performance Units
From 1998 through 2005, we issued various classes of High
Performance Units, or HPUs. These HPUs were issued to limited
liability companies owned by certain members of our senior
management (and Aimcos independent directors in the case
of Class I HPUs only) in exchange for cash in amounts that
we determined, with the assistance of a nationally recognized
independent valuation expert, to be the fair value of the HPUs.
The terms of the HPUs provide for the issuance, following a
measurement period of generally three years of an increased
number of HPUs depending on the degree, if any, to which certain
financial performance benchmarks are achieved over the
applicable measurement period. The holders of HPUs at the
conclusion of the measurement period receive the same amount of
distributions that are paid to holders of an equivalent number
of our outstanding common OP Units. At December 31,
2009 and 2008, 2,344,719 Class I HPUs, the sole class of
HPUs to meet the performance benchmarks, were outstanding. The
minimum performance benchmarks were not achieved for HPU
Classes II through IX. Accordingly, those HPUs had only
nominal value at the conclusion of the related measurement
period and were reacquired by us and cancelled.
Investment
in Aimco
In 1998, Aimco issued 1.0 million shares of Class J
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, which we refer to as
Class J Preferred Stock, for proceeds of
$100.0 million. The proceeds were contributed by Aimco to
us in exchange for 1.0 million Class J Partnership
Preferred Units, which we refer to as Class J Preferred
Units. Concurrently, we issued 250,000 Class J Preferred
Units valued at $25.0 million to Aimco, in exchange for
250,000 shares of Class J Preferred Stock. In June
2000, we converted 250,000 shares of Aimco Class J
Preferred Stock, with a liquidation value of $25.0 million,
into 625,000 shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. In
connection with this conversion, 41,991 shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock, valued at $1.5 million, were
exchanged by us for common OP Units held by a limited
partner. In 2001, 198,269 shares of Aimco Class A
Common Stock, valued at $7.1 million, were exchanged by us
for common OP Units held by a limited partner. Our
investment in Aimco Class A Common Stock is presented in
the accompanying financial statements as a reduction to
partners capital.
Registration
Statements
We and Aimco have a shelf registration statement that provides
for the issuance of debt securities by us and debt and equity
securities by Aimco.
|
|
NOTE 12
|
Share-Based
Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans
|
Stock
Award and Incentive Plan
Aimco, from time to time, issues restricted stock and stock
options to its employees. We are required to issue common
OP Units to Aimco for the same number of shares of Aimco
Class A Common Stock that are issued to employees under
these arrangements. Upon exercise of the stock options, Aimco
must contribute to us the proceeds received in connection with
the exercised options. Therefore, the following disclosures
pertain to Aimcos stock options. Our obligations to issue
common OP Units under Aimcos share based compensation
plans results in reciprocal accounting treatment in our
financial statements.
Aimcos board of directors adopted the Apartment Investment
and Management Company 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or
the 1997 Plan, to attract and retain officers, key employees and
independent directors. The 1997 Plan reserved for issuance a
maximum of 20 million shares, which may be in the form of
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and
restricted stock, or other types of awards as authorized under
the 1997 Plan. The 1997 Plan expired on April 24, 2007. On
April 30, 2007, the 2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or
the 2007 Plan, was approved as successor to the 1997 Plan. The
2007 Plan reserves for issuance a maximum of 4.1 million
shares, which may be in the form of incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, or other types
of awards as authorized under the 2007 Plan. Pursuant to the
anti-dilution provisions of the 2007 Plan, the number of shares
reserved for issuance has been adjusted to reflect Aimcos
special dividends discussed in Note 11. At
December 31, 2009 there were approximately 1.7 million
shares available to be granted under the 2007 Plan. The 2007
Plan is administered by the Compensation and Human Resources
Committee of Aimcos board of directors. In the case of
stock options, the exercise price of the options
I-64
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
granted may not be less than the fair market value of Aimco
Class A Common Stock at the date of grant. The term of the
options is generally ten years from the date of grant. The
options typically vest over a period of one to four or five
years from the date of grant. Aimco generally issues new shares
upon exercise of options. Restricted stock awards typically vest
over a period of three to five years.
Refer to Stock-Based Compensation in Note 2 for discussion
of our accounting policy related to stock-based compensation.
We estimated the fair value of our options using a Black-Scholes
closed-form valuation model using the assumptions set forth in
the table below. For options granted in 2009 and 2008, the
expected term of the options was based on historical option
exercises and post-vesting terminations. For options granted in
2007, the expected term of the options reflects the average of
the vesting period and the contractual term for the options,
with the exception of a grant of approximately 0.6 million
options to an executive during 2007, for which the expected term
used was equal to the vesting period of five years. Expected
volatility reflects the historical volatility of Aimco
Class A Common Stock during the historical period
commensurate with the expected term of the options that ended on
the date of grant. The expected dividend yield reflects
expectations regarding cash dividend amounts per share paid on
Aimco Class A Common Stock during the expected term of the
option and the risk-free interest rate reflects the annualized
yield of a zero coupon U.S. Treasury security with a term
equal to the expected term of the option. The weighted average
fair value of options and our valuation assumptions for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value
|
|
$2.47
|
|
$4.34
|
|
$6.28
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.26%
|
|
3.12%
|
|
4.70%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
8.00%
|
|
6.02%
|
|
4.94%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
45.64%
|
|
24.02%
|
|
21.66%
|
Weighted average expected life of options
|
|
6.9 years
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
5.6 years
|
The following table summarizes activity for Aimcos
outstanding stock options for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 (numbers of options in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
31.01
|
|
|
|
8,555
|
|
|
$
|
39.57
|
|
|
|
8,598
|
|
|
$
|
39.36
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
8.92
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
39.77
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
57.25
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
37.45
|
|
|
|
(1,403
|
)
|
|
|
38.29
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,436
|
)
|
|
|
32.03
|
|
|
|
(1,423
|
)
|
|
|
38.75
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
37.83
|
|
Adjustment to outstanding options pursuant to special dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
8,873
|
|
|
$
|
28.22
|
|
|
|
10,344
|
|
|
$
|
31.01
|
|
|
|
8,555
|
|
|
$
|
39.57
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
|
$
|
29.65
|
|
|
|
7,221
|
|
|
$
|
29.51
|
|
|
|
6,417
|
|
|
$
|
37.75
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with Aimcos special dividends discussed in
Note 11, effective on the record date of each dividend, the
number of options and exercise prices of all outstanding awards
were adjusted pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the
applicable plans based on the market price of Aimcos stock
on the ex-dividend dates of the related special dividends. The
adjustment to the number of outstanding options is reflected in
the table separate from the other activity during the periods at
the weighted average exercise price for those outstanding
options. The exercise prices for options granted and forfeited
in the table above reflect the actual exercise prices at the
time of the related activity. The number and weighted average
exercise price for options outstanding and exercisable at the
end of the year reflect the adjustment for the applicable
special dividends. The adjustment of the awards pursuant to
Aimcos special dividends is considered a modification of
the awards, but did not result in a change in the fair value of
any awards and therefore did not result in a change in total
compensation to be recognized over the remaining term of the
awards. |
I-65
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The intrinsic value of a stock option represents the amount by
which the current price of the underlying stock exceeds the
exercise price of the option. Options outstanding at
December 31, 2009, had an aggregate intrinsic value of
$5.7 million and a weighted average remaining contractual
term of 4.4 years. Options exercisable at December 31,
2008, had no aggregate intrinsic value and a weighted average
remaining contractual term of 5.7 years. No stock options
were exercised during the year ended 2009. The intrinsic value
of stock options exercised during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, was less than $0.1 million
and $28.9 million, respectively. We may realize tax
benefits in connection with the exercise of options by employees
of Aimcos taxable subsidiaries. As no stock options were
exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009, we
realized no related tax benefits.
The following table summarizes activity for Aimcos
restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 (numbers of shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unvested at beginning of year
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
40.33
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
46.08
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
$
|
40.11
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
8.92
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
39.85
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
60.13
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
34.42
|
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
43.45
|
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
40.31
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
28.57
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
46.85
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
47.43
|
|
Issued pursuant to special dividends(1)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
9.58
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
22.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at end of year
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
24.23
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
40.33
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
46.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This represents shares of restricted stock issued to holders of
restricted stock pursuant to Aimcos special dividends
discussed in Note 11. The weighted average grant-date fair
value for these shares represents the price of Aimco
Class A Common Stock on the determination date for each
dividend. The issuance of the additional shares of restricted
stock resulted in no incremental compensation expense. |
The aggregate fair value of shares that vested during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
$3.1 million, $16.5 million and $19.5 million,
respectively.
Total compensation cost recognized for restricted stock and
stock option awards was $8.0 million, $17.6 million
and $19.2 million for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Of these amounts,
$1.3 million, $3.8 million and $4.3 million,
respectively, were capitalized. At December 31, 2009, total
unvested compensation cost not yet recognized was
$10.1 million. We expect to recognize this compensation
over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under the terms of Aimcos employee stock purchase plan,
eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 15%
of their base compensation to purchase shares of Aimcos
Class A Common Stock at a five percent discount from its
fair value on the last day of the calendar quarter during which
payroll deductions are made. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, 20,076,
8,926 and 3,751 shares were purchased under this plan at an
average price of $8.82, $23.86 and $44.67, respectively. No
compensation cost is recognized in connection with this plan.
401(k)
Plan
We provide a 401(k) defined-contribution employee savings plan.
Employees who have completed 30 days of service and are
age 18 or older are eligible to participate. For the period
from January 1, 2009 through January 29, 2009, and
during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, our
matching contributions were made in the following manner:
(1) a 100% match on the first 3% of the participants
compensation; and (2) a 50% match on the next 2% of the
participants compensation. On December 31, 2008, we
suspended employer matching contributions effective
January 29, 2009. We may reinstate employer matching
contributions at any time. We incurred costs in connection with
this plan of approximately $0.6 million, $5.2 million
and $5.2 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
I-66
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 13
|
Discontinued
Operations and Assets Held for Sale
|
We report as discontinued operations real estate assets that
meet the definition of a component of an entity and have been
sold or meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. We
include all results of these discontinued operations, less
applicable income taxes, in a separate component of income on
the consolidated statements of income under the heading
income from discontinued operations, net. This
treatment resulted in the retrospective adjustment of 2009, 2008
and 2007 financial statement amounts to reflect as discontinued
operations all properties sold or classified as held for sale as
of September 30, 2010.
We are currently marketing for sale certain real estate
properties that are inconsistent with our long-term investment
strategy. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate
whether such properties meet the criteria to be classified as
held for sale, including whether such properties are expected to
be sold within 12 months. Additionally, certain properties
that do not meet all of the criteria to be classified as held
for sale at the balance sheet date may nevertheless be sold and
included in discontinued operations in the subsequent
12 months; thus the number of properties that may be sold
during the subsequent 12 months could exceed the number
classified as held for sale. At December 31, 2009 and 2008,
we had 31 and 120 properties, with an aggregate of 5,825 and
28,328 units, classified as held for sale, respectively. Amounts
classified as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Real estate, net
|
|
$
|
199,743
|
|
|
$
|
1,228,368
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
17,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
203,670
|
|
|
$
|
1,245,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property debt
|
|
$
|
178,339
|
|
|
$
|
909,360
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
15,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
183,892
|
|
|
$
|
924,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we
sold 89, 151 and 73 consolidated properties with an aggregate
22,503, 37,202 and 11,588 units, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, discontinued
operations includes the results of operations for the periods
prior to the date of sale for all properties sold or classified
as held for sale as of September 30, 2010.
I-67
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of the components of income from
discontinued operations for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues
|
|
$
|
196,838
|
|
|
$
|
506,979
|
|
|
$
|
641,531
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
(98,471
|
)
|
|
|
(251,611
|
)
|
|
|
(317,220
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(61,634
|
)
|
|
|
(132,463
|
)
|
|
|
(162,134
|
)
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
(54,530
|
)
|
|
|
(27,420
|
)
|
|
|
(5,430
|
)
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
(11,921
|
)
|
|
|
(13,402
|
)
|
|
|
(7,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(29,718
|
)
|
|
|
82,083
|
|
|
|
148,775
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(39,337
|
)
|
|
|
(98,467
|
)
|
|
|
(125,554
|
)
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before gain on dispositions of real estate and
income taxes
|
|
|
(68,447
|
)
|
|
|
(14,376
|
)
|
|
|
60,079
|
|
Gain on dispositions of real estate
|
|
|
221,793
|
|
|
|
800,335
|
|
|
|
117,628
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
(39,794
|
)
|
|
|
(2,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
$
|
153,903
|
|
|
$
|
746,165
|
|
|
$
|
175,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operation attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated real estate partnerships
|
|
$
|
(62,085
|
)
|
|
$
|
(150,140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership
|
|
$
|
91,818
|
|
|
$
|
596,025
|
|
|
$
|
103,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on dispositions of real estate is reported net of
incremental direct costs incurred in connection with the
transaction, including any prepayment penalties incurred upon
repayment of property loans collateralized by the property being
sold. Such prepayment penalties totaled $29.0 million,
$64.9 million and $12.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We classify
interest expense related to property debt within discontinued
operations when the related real estate asset is sold or
classified as held for sale. As discussed in Note 2, during
the year ended December 31, 2009, we allocated
$10.1 million of goodwill related to our real estate
segment to the carrying amounts of the properties sold or
classified as held for sale. Of these amounts, $8.7 million
was reflected as a reduction of gain on dispositions of real
estate and $1.4 million was reflected as an adjustment of
impairment losses.
I-68
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 14
|
Earnings
per Unit
|
We calculate earnings per unit based on the weighted average
number of common OP Units, participating securities, common
OP Unit equivalents and dilutive convertible securities
outstanding during the period. We consider both common
OP Units and Class I HPUs, which have identical rights
to distributions and undistributed earnings, to be common units
for purposes of the earnings per unit data presented below. The
following table illustrates the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per unit for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(197,883
|
)
|
|
$
|
(118,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,348
|
)
|
Loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
39,643
|
|
|
|
(5,609
|
)
|
|
|
(19,927
|
)
|
Income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders
|
|
|
(56,854
|
)
|
|
|
(61,354
|
)
|
|
|
(73,144
|
)
|
Income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(215,094
|
)
|
|
$
|
(192,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(146,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
153,903
|
|
|
$
|
746,165
|
|
|
$
|
175,603
|
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(62,085
|
)
|
|
|
(150,140
|
)
|
|
|
(72,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
91,818
|
|
|
$
|
596,025
|
|
|
$
|
103,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(43,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
627,788
|
|
|
$
|
126,255
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(22,442
|
)
|
|
|
(155,749
|
)
|
|
|
(92,138
|
)
|
Income attributable to the Partnerships preferred
unitholders
|
|
|
(56,854
|
)
|
|
|
(61,354
|
)
|
|
|
(73,144
|
)
|
Income attributable to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(123,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
403,700
|
|
|
$
|
(43,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per unit weighted
average number of shares of common units outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common OP Units
|
|
|
120,836
|
|
|
|
95,881
|
|
|
|
102,474
|
|
Class I HPUs
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common units
|
|
|
123,180
|
|
|
|
98,249
|
|
|
|
104,853
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per unit
|
|
|
123,180
|
|
|
|
98,249
|
|
|
|
104,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and
diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.40
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed in Note 2, earnings (loss) per common unit for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 have been
retroactively adjusted for the effect of our adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
and FASB ASU
2010-01.
As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the common unit
equivalents that could potentially dilute basic earnings per
unit in future periods totaled 8.9 million,
9.2 million and 8.1 million, respectively. These
securities, representing stock options to purchase shares of
Aimco Class A Common Stock, have been excluded from the
earnings per unit computations for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, because their effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
I-69
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Participating securities, consisting of unvested restricted
shares of Aimco stock and shares of Aimco stock purchased
pursuant to officer loans, receive dividends similar to shares
of Aimco Class A Common Stock and common OP Units
totaled 0.5 million, 1.0 million and 1.2 million
at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
effect of participating securities is reflected in basic and
diluted earnings per unit computations for the periods presented
above using the two-class method of allocating distributed and
undistributed earnings. During the year ended December 31,
2009, the adjustment to compensation expense recognized related
to cumulative dividends on forfeited shares of restricted stock
exceeded the amount of dividends declared related to
participating securities. Accordingly, distributed earnings
attributed to participating securities during 2009 were reduced
to zero for purposes of calculating earnings per unit using the
two-class method.
As discussed in Note 11, we have various classes of
preferred OP Units, which may be redeemed at the
holders option. We may redeem these units for cash or at
our option, shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock. During
the periods presented, no common unit equivalents related to
these preferred OP Units have been included in earnings per
unit computations because their effect was antidilutive.
|
|
NOTE 15
|
Unaudited
Summarized Consolidated Quarterly Information
|
Summarized unaudited consolidated quarterly information for 2009
and 2008 is provided below (in thousands, except per unit
amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter(1)
|
|
2009
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
286,386
|
|
|
$
|
288,066
|
|
|
$
|
285,397
|
|
|
$
|
291,887
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(256,316
|
)
|
|
|
(258,578
|
)
|
|
|
(268,206
|
)
|
|
|
(268,294
|
)
|
Operating income
|
|
|
30,070
|
|
|
|
29,488
|
|
|
|
17,191
|
|
|
|
23,593
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(34,683
|
)
|
|
|
(45,986
|
)
|
|
|
(54,758
|
)
|
|
|
(62,456
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
38,563
|
|
|
|
45,407
|
|
|
|
67,618
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(32,368
|
)
|
|
|
(7,423
|
)
|
|
|
(9,351
|
)
|
|
|
5,162
|
|
Loss attributable to the Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
|
(40,320
|
)
|
|
|
(32,336
|
)
|
|
|
(43,510
|
)
|
|
|
(7,110
|
)
|
Loss per common unit basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.57
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Weighted average common units outstanding(2)
|
|
|
119,661
|
|
|
|
124,333
|
|
|
|
124,376
|
|
|
|
124,351
|
|
Weighted average common units and common unit equivalents
outstanding(2)
|
|
|
119,661
|
|
|
|
124,333
|
|
|
|
124,376
|
|
|
|
124,351
|
|
I-70
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter(1)
|
|
2008
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
285,524
|
|
|
$
|
310,371
|
|
|
$
|
310,213
|
|
|
$
|
293,315
|
|
Total operating expenses(3)
|
|
|
(247,611
|
)
|
|
|
(256,302
|
)
|
|
|
(265,632
|
)
|
|
|
(381,914
|
)
|
Operating income (loss)(3)
|
|
|
37,913
|
|
|
|
54,069
|
|
|
|
44,581
|
|
|
|
(88,599
|
)
|
Loss (income) from continuing operations(3)
|
|
|
(30,975
|
)
|
|
|
(20,657
|
)
|
|
|
74,982
|
|
|
|
(141,727
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
|
|
363,807
|
|
|
|
162,604
|
|
|
|
212,243
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(23,464
|
)
|
|
|
343,150
|
|
|
|
237,586
|
|
|
|
70,516
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
|
(42,768
|
)
|
|
|
265,723
|
|
|
|
174,009
|
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common unit basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to the
Partnerships common unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(1.54
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to the Partnerships common
unitholders
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Weighted average common units outstanding(2)
|
|
|
99,135
|
|
|
|
97,349
|
|
|
|
95,511
|
|
|
|
101,001
|
|
Weighted average common units and common unit equivalents
outstanding(2)
|
|
|
99,135
|
|
|
|
97,349
|
|
|
|
95,816
|
|
|
|
101,001
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to 2009 and 2008
quarterly amounts primarily related to treatment of discontinued
operations for properties sold or classified as held for sale
through September 30, 2010 and related to newly adopted
accounting standards during 2009 (see Note 2). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As discussed in Note 2, in December 2009, we adopted the
provisions of ASU
2010-01,
which resulted in reductions in the number of weighted average
common OP Units and common OP unit equivalents outstanding, as
compared to the amounts previously reported. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Total operating expenses, operating income (loss) and (loss)
income from continuing operations for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, includes a $91.1 million provision
for impairment losses on real estate development assets, which
is discussed further in Note 2. |
|
|
NOTE 16
|
Transactions
with Affiliates
|
We earn revenue from affiliated real estate partnerships. These
revenues include fees for property management services,
partnership and asset management services, risk management
services and transactional services such as refinancing,
construction supervisory and disposition (including promote
income, which is income earned in connection with the
disposition of properties owned by certain of our consolidated
joint ventures). In addition, we are reimbursed for our costs in
connection with the management of the unconsolidated real estate
partnerships. These fees and reimbursements for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 totaled
$18.5 million, $72.5 million and $42.1 million,
respectively. The total accounts receivable due from affiliates
was $23.7 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $3.4 million, at December 31, 2009, and
$39.0 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2.8 million, at December 31, 2008.
Additionally, we earn interest income on notes from real estate
partnerships in which we are the general partner and hold either
par value or discounted notes. During the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we did not recognize a
significant amount of interest income on par value notes from
unconsolidated real estate partnerships. Interest income earned
on par value notes from unconsolidated real estate partnerships
totaled $8.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. Accretion income recognized on discounted notes from
affiliated real estate partnerships totaled $0.1 million,
$1.4 million and $8.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. See
Note 5 for additional information on notes receivable from
unconsolidated real estate partnerships.
|
|
NOTE 17
|
Business
Segments
|
Based on a planned reduction in our transactional activities,
during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we
reevaluated our reportable segments and determined our
investment management reporting unit no longer meets the
I-71
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
requirements for a reportable segment. Additionally, to provide
more meaningful information regarding our real estate
operations, we elected to disaggregate information for the prior
real estate segment. Following these changes, we have two
reportable segments: conventional real estate operations and
affordable real estate operations. Our conventional real estate
operations consist of market-rate apartments with rents paid by
the resident and included 226 properties with 70,680 units
as of December 31, 2009. Our affordable real estate
operations consisted of 241 properties with 27,591 units as
of December 31, 2009, with rents that are generally paid,
in whole or part, by a government agency. Based on this change
in reportable segments, we have recast the presentation of our
results of operations for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, as presented below.
Our chief operating decision maker uses various generally
accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance
and financial conditions of the business, including: Net Asset
Value, which is the estimated fair value of our assets, net of
debt, or NAV; Funds From Operations, or FFO; Adjusted FFO, or
AFFO, which is FFO less spending for Capital Replacements; same
store property operating results; net operating income; Free
Cash Flow which is net operating income less spending for
Capital Replacements; financial coverage ratios; and leverage as
shown on our balance sheet. Our chief operating decision maker
emphasizes net operating income as a key measurement of segment
profit or loss. Segment net operating income is generally
defined as segment revenues less direct segment operating
expenses.
The following tables present the revenues, net operating income
(loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations of our
conventional and affordable real estate operations segments for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not Allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
to Segments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
909,218
|
|
|
$
|
187,583
|
|
|
$
|
5,082
|
|
|
$
|
1,101,883
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,853
|
|
|
|
49,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
909,218
|
|
|
|
187,583
|
|
|
|
54,935
|
|
|
|
1,151,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
363,863
|
|
|
|
92,416
|
|
|
|
59,469
|
|
|
|
515,748
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,933
|
|
|
|
433,933
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,643
|
|
|
|
56,643
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,721
|
|
|
|
15,721
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,241
|
|
|
|
11,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
363,863
|
|
|
|
92,416
|
|
|
|
595,115
|
|
|
|
1,051,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
545,355
|
|
|
|
95,167
|
|
|
|
(540,180
|
)
|
|
|
100,342
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(298,225
|
)
|
|
|
(298,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
545,355
|
|
|
$
|
95,167
|
|
|
$
|
(838,405
|
)
|
|
$
|
(197,883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I-72
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not Allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
to Segments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
913,793
|
|
|
$
|
180,456
|
|
|
$
|
6,344
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,593
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,830
|
|
|
|
98,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
913,793
|
|
|
|
180,456
|
|
|
|
105,174
|
|
|
|
1,199,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
360,479
|
|
|
|
91,867
|
|
|
|
74,870
|
|
|
|
527,216
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,784
|
|
|
|
24,784
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,084
|
|
|
|
383,084
|
|
Provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,138
|
|
|
|
91,138
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,376
|
|
|
|
80,376
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
|
|
22,059
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,802
|
|
|
|
22,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
360,479
|
|
|
|
91,867
|
|
|
|
699,113
|
|
|
|
1,151,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
553,314
|
|
|
|
88,589
|
|
|
|
(593,939
|
)
|
|
|
47,964
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,341
|
)
|
|
|
(166,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
553,314
|
|
|
$
|
88,589
|
|
|
$
|
(760,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(118,377
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not Allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
to Segments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental and other property revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
882,545
|
|
|
$
|
168,885
|
|
|
$
|
6,924
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,354
|
|
Asset management and tax credit revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,755
|
|
|
|
73,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
882,545
|
|
|
|
168,885
|
|
|
|
80,679
|
|
|
|
1,132,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
354,455
|
|
|
|
83,126
|
|
|
|
69,822
|
|
|
|
507,403
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,507
|
|
|
|
20,507
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,804
|
|
|
|
337,804
|
|
Provision for operating real estate impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,359
|
|
|
|
72,359
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,917
|
|
|
|
18,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
354,455
|
|
|
|
83,126
|
|
|
|
520,489
|
|
|
|
958,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
528,090
|
|
|
|
85,759
|
|
|
|
(439,810
|
)
|
|
|
174,039
|
|
Other items included in continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223,387
|
)
|
|
|
(223,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
528,090
|
|
|
$
|
85,759
|
|
|
$
|
(663,197
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our chief operating decision maker assesses the performance of
our conventional and affordable real estate operations using
among other measures, net operating income, excluding property
management revenues and certain property management expenses,
casualty gains and losses, depreciation and amortization and
provision for operating real estate impairment losses.
Accordingly, we do not allocate these amounts to our segments. |
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
for continuing operations, our rental revenues include
$129.8 million, $122.2 million and
$112.0 million, respectively, of subsidies from government
agencies, which represented 11.8%, 11.1% and 10.6%,
respectively, of our real estate operations revenues.
I-73
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets of our reportable segments are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
$
|
6,032,988
|
|
|
|
6,310,926
|
|
Affordable
|
|
|
1,130,089
|
|
|
|
1,205,157
|
|
Corporate and other assets
|
|
|
759,062
|
|
|
|
1,940,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
7,922,139
|
|
|
|
9,456,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
capital additions related to our conventional segment totaled
$208.0 million, $516.6 million and
$595.6 million, respectively, and capital additions related
to our affordable segment totaled $67.4 million,
$148.6 million and $94.1 million, respectively.
I-74
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
SCHEDULE III:
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Forest Place
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
OakPark, IL
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
18,815
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
23,308
|
|
|
|
25,972
|
|
|
|
(8,692
|
)
|
|
|
17,280
|
|
|
|
27,761
|
|
1582 First Avenue
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
5,226
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
4,977
|
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
173 E. 90th Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
May-04
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
11,773
|
|
|
|
4,535
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
12,067
|
|
|
|
5,686
|
|
|
|
17,753
|
|
|
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|
|
16,388
|
|
|
|
8,772
|
|
182-188
Columbus Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Feb-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
17,187
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
19,123
|
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
24,177
|
|
|
|
(992
|
)
|
|
|
23,185
|
|
|
|
13,471
|
|
204-206 West
133rd Street
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
4,352
|
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
6,662
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
6,359
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
2232-2240
Seventh Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
|
|
3,785
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
3,366
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
8,125
|
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
7,608
|
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
2247-2253
Seventh Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
6,787
|
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
4,230
|
|
|
|
11,586
|
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
2252-2258
Seventh Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
|
4,504
|
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
5,623
|
|
|
|
9,941
|
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
|
9,169
|
|
|
|
5,125
|
|
2300-2310
Seventh Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
8,623
|
|
|
|
6,964
|
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
10,417
|
|
|
|
10,430
|
|
|
|
20,847
|
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
19,406
|
|
|
|
9,896
|
|
236-238 East 88th Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-04
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
2,914
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
4,140
|
|
|
|
12,960
|
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
|
|
11,805
|
|
|
|
6,879
|
|
237-239
Ninth Avenue
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
8,430
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
8,494
|
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
(614
|
)
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
240 West 73rd Street, LLC
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Sep-04
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
68,006
|
|
|
|
12,140
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
68,109
|
|
|
|
15,600
|
|
|
|
83,709
|
|
|
|
(2,827
|
)
|
|
|
80,882
|
|
|
|
30,286
|
|
2484 Seventh Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1921
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
2900 on First Apartments
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Oct-08
|
|
Seattle, WA
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
19,015
|
|
|
|
17,518
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
19,071
|
|
|
|
17,792
|
|
|
|
36,863
|
|
|
|
(860
|
)
|
|
|
36,003
|
|
|
|
20,719
|
|
306 East 89th Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jul-04
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1930
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
311 & 313 East 73rd Street
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-03
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1904
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
5,678
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
322-324 East
61st Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
6,319
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
6,372
|
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
9,224
|
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
3400 Avenue of the Arts
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Costa Mesa, CA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
55,223
|
|
|
|
65,506
|
|
|
|
73,301
|
|
|
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
136,790
|
|
|
|
194,030
|
|
|
|
(31,750
|
)
|
|
|
162,280
|
|
|
|
119,869
|
|
452 East 78th Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-04
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
464-466
Amsterdam &
200-210 W. 83rd
Street
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Feb-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
23,677
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
25,552
|
|
|
|
9,107
|
|
|
|
34,659
|
|
|
|
(1,241
|
)
|
|
|
33,418
|
|
|
|
19,679
|
|
510 East 88th Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-04
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
3,163
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
4,417
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
4,110
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
514-516 East
88th Street
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1900
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
6,230
|
|
|
|
2,168
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
6,282
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
8,954
|
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
|
|
8,336
|
|
|
|
4,607
|
|
656 St. Nicholas Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1920
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
3,576
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
6,674
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
759 St. Nicholas Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1920
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
865 Bellevue
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-00
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
3,558
|
|
|
|
12,037
|
|
|
|
27,055
|
|
|
|
3,558
|
|
|
|
39,092
|
|
|
|
42,650
|
|
|
|
(11,840
|
)
|
|
|
30,810
|
|
|
|
19,184
|
|
Arbors (Grovetree), The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-97
|
|
Tempe, AZ
|
|
|
1967
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
9,148
|
|
|
|
10,240
|
|
|
|
(4,038
|
)
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
6,743
|
|
Arbours Of Hermitage, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-00
|
|
Hermitage, TN
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
3,217
|
|
|
|
12,023
|
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
3,217
|
|
|
|
18,818
|
|
|
|
22,035
|
|
|
|
(8,527
|
)
|
|
|
13,508
|
|
|
|
10,258
|
|
Auburn Glen
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-06
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
7,483
|
|
|
|
8,191
|
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
7,670
|
|
|
|
11,206
|
|
|
|
18,876
|
|
|
|
(2,098
|
)
|
|
|
16,778
|
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
BaLaye
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-06
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
10,329
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
10,608
|
|
|
|
29,490
|
|
|
|
40,098
|
|
|
|
(4,187
|
)
|
|
|
35,911
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
Bank Lofts
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Apr-01
|
|
Denver, CO
|
|
|
1920
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
9,045
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
10,713
|
|
|
|
14,238
|
|
|
|
(4,668
|
)
|
|
|
9,570
|
|
|
|
7,242
|
|
Bay Parc Plaza
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Sep-04
|
|
Miami, FL
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
22,680
|
|
|
|
41,847
|
|
|
|
4,097
|
|
|
|
22,680
|
|
|
|
45,944
|
|
|
|
68,624
|
|
|
|
(6,612
|
)
|
|
|
62,012
|
|
|
|
46,294
|
|
Bay Ridge at Nashua
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-03
|
|
Nashua, NH
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
40,713
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
3,262
|
|
|
|
47,698
|
|
|
|
50,960
|
|
|
|
(10,541
|
)
|
|
|
40,419
|
|
|
|
40,766
|
|
Bayberry Hill Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Framingham, MA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
18,915
|
|
|
|
35,945
|
|
|
|
8,744
|
|
|
|
18,916
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
63,604
|
|
|
|
(14,036
|
)
|
|
|
49,568
|
|
|
|
35,250
|
|
Bayhead Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
8,621
|
|
|
|
10,032
|
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
6,632
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
Boston Lofts
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Apr-01
|
|
Denver, CO
|
|
|
1890
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
20,589
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
|
|
23,777
|
|
|
|
27,224
|
|
|
|
(9,855
|
)
|
|
|
17,369
|
|
|
|
14,559
|
|
Boulder Creek
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
Boulder, CO
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
7,730
|
|
|
|
17,156
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
24,886
|
|
|
|
25,641
|
|
|
|
(11,913
|
)
|
|
|
13,728
|
|
|
|
12,031
|
|
Brandywine
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
St. Petersburg, FL
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
12,725
|
|
|
|
8,763
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
22,925
|
|
|
|
(13,782
|
)
|
|
|
9,143
|
|
|
|
21,124
|
|
I-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Breakers, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-98
|
|
Daytona Beach, FL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
5,507
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
8,764
|
|
|
|
9,772
|
|
|
|
(3,856
|
)
|
|
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
6,378
|
|
Broadcast Center
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
27,603
|
|
|
|
41,244
|
|
|
|
29,066
|
|
|
|
29,407
|
|
|
|
68,506
|
|
|
|
97,913
|
|
|
|
(15,963
|
)
|
|
|
81,950
|
|
|
|
55,875
|
|
Buena Vista
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Pasadena, CA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
9,693
|
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
9,693
|
|
|
|
7,944
|
|
|
|
17,637
|
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
16,869
|
|
|
|
10,607
|
|
Burke Shire Commons
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Burke, VA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
4,867
|
|
|
|
23,617
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
4,867
|
|
|
|
27,477
|
|
|
|
32,344
|
|
|
|
(10,304
|
)
|
|
|
22,040
|
|
|
|
46,100
|
|
Calhoun Beach Club
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Dec-98
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
|
1928
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
11,708
|
|
|
|
73,334
|
|
|
|
45,743
|
|
|
|
11,708
|
|
|
|
119,077
|
|
|
|
130,785
|
|
|
|
(40,408
|
)
|
|
|
90,377
|
|
|
|
49,119
|
|
Canterbury Green
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-99
|
|
Fort Wayne, IN
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
13,659
|
|
|
|
73,115
|
|
|
|
25,704
|
|
|
|
13,659
|
|
|
|
98,819
|
|
|
|
112,478
|
|
|
|
(45,994
|
)
|
|
|
66,484
|
|
|
|
53,200
|
|
Canyon Terrace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Saugus, CA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
6,602
|
|
|
|
5,909
|
|
|
|
7,508
|
|
|
|
12,303
|
|
|
|
19,811
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
16,218
|
|
|
|
11,750
|
|
Carriage Hill
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-00
|
|
East Lansing, MI
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
1,957
|
|
|
|
7,912
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
1,957
|
|
|
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
11,922
|
|
|
|
(5,434
|
)
|
|
|
6,488
|
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
Casa del Mar at Baymeadows
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-06
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
10,562
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
11,828
|
|
|
|
16,867
|
|
|
|
(1,752
|
)
|
|
|
15,115
|
|
|
|
9,434
|
|
Cedar Rim
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Newcastle, WA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
17,174
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
22,392
|
|
|
|
23,153
|
|
|
|
(9,405
|
)
|
|
|
13,748
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
Center Square
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Doylestown, PA
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
4,190
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
|
|
8,304
|
|
|
|
(3,104
|
)
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
Charleston Landing
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Brandon, FL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
8,656
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
16,367
|
|
|
|
23,855
|
|
|
|
(5,745
|
)
|
|
|
18,110
|
|
|
|
13,101
|
|
Chesapeake Landing I
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Aurora, IL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
15,800
|
|
|
|
16,875
|
|
|
|
4,931
|
|
|
|
15,800
|
|
|
|
21,806
|
|
|
|
37,606
|
|
|
|
(7,748
|
)
|
|
|
29,858
|
|
|
|
24,630
|
|
Chesapeake Landing II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Aurora, IL
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
11,288
|
|
|
|
13,257
|
|
|
|
(4,730
|
)
|
|
|
8,527
|
|
|
|
10,241
|
|
Chestnut Hall
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-06
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1923
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
12,047
|
|
|
|
14,299
|
|
|
|
4,653
|
|
|
|
12,338
|
|
|
|
18,661
|
|
|
|
30,999
|
|
|
|
(3,996
|
)
|
|
|
27,003
|
|
|
|
18,690
|
|
Chestnut Hill
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1963
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
6,463
|
|
|
|
49,315
|
|
|
|
48,996
|
|
|
|
6,463
|
|
|
|
98,311
|
|
|
|
104,774
|
|
|
|
(36,814
|
)
|
|
|
67,960
|
|
|
|
51,444
|
|
Chimneys of Cradle Rock
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jun-04
|
|
Columbia, MD
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
|
8,107
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
|
|
10,919
|
|
|
|
(2,284
|
)
|
|
|
8,635
|
|
|
|
16,737
|
|
Colonnade Gardens
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-97
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
|
|
8,024
|
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
4,409
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
Colony at Kenilworth
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Towson, MD
|
|
|
1966
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
18,798
|
|
|
|
10,801
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
29,599
|
|
|
|
32,002
|
|
|
|
(14,784
|
)
|
|
|
17,218
|
|
|
|
24,443
|
|
Columbus Avenue
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Sep-03
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
1880
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
35,472
|
|
|
|
9,450
|
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
35,527
|
|
|
|
12,994
|
|
|
|
48,521
|
|
|
|
(4,970
|
)
|
|
|
43,551
|
|
|
|
25,826
|
|
Country Lakes I
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-01
|
|
Naperville, IL
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
8,512
|
|
|
|
10,832
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
8,512
|
|
|
|
14,132
|
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
(5,213
|
)
|
|
|
17,431
|
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
Country Lakes II
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-97
|
|
Naperville, IL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
29,430
|
|
|
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
35,351
|
|
|
|
40,516
|
|
|
|
(14,200
|
)
|
|
|
26,316
|
|
|
|
24,893
|
|
Creekside
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Denver, CO
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
12,697
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
|
|
17,489
|
|
|
|
20,678
|
|
|
|
(7,788
|
)
|
|
|
12,890
|
|
|
|
14,359
|
|
Creekside
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Simi Valley, CA
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
24,595
|
|
|
|
18,818
|
|
|
|
6,775
|
|
|
|
25,245
|
|
|
|
24,943
|
|
|
|
50,188
|
|
|
|
(8,109
|
)
|
|
|
42,079
|
|
|
|
40,670
|
|
Crescent at West Hollywood, The
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
West Hollywood, CA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
15,382
|
|
|
|
10,215
|
|
|
|
14,817
|
|
|
|
15,765
|
|
|
|
24,649
|
|
|
|
40,414
|
|
|
|
(9,223
|
)
|
|
|
31,191
|
|
|
|
24,195
|
|
Douglaston Villas and Townhomes
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-99
|
|
Altamonte Springs, FL
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
7,460
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
16,813
|
|
|
|
18,479
|
|
|
|
(6,381
|
)
|
|
|
12,098
|
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
Elm Creek
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Elmhurst, IL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
5,534
|
|
|
|
30,830
|
|
|
|
17,422
|
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
|
48,151
|
|
|
|
53,786
|
|
|
|
(18,347
|
)
|
|
|
35,439
|
|
|
|
35,154
|
|
Evanston Place
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Evanston, IL
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
|
|
25,546
|
|
|
|
4,398
|
|
|
|
3,232
|
|
|
|
29,944
|
|
|
|
33,176
|
|
|
|
(10,325
|
)
|
|
|
22,851
|
|
|
|
21,645
|
|
Fairlane East
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-01
|
|
Dearborn, MI
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
11,711
|
|
|
|
5,136
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
16,847
|
|
|
|
23,397
|
|
|
|
(8,610
|
)
|
|
|
14,787
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
Farmingdale
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Darien, IL
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
11,763
|
|
|
|
15,174
|
|
|
|
9,177
|
|
|
|
11,763
|
|
|
|
24,351
|
|
|
|
36,114
|
|
|
|
(9,406
|
)
|
|
|
26,708
|
|
|
|
17,732
|
|
Ferntree
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
2,078
|
|
|
|
13,752
|
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
|
16,946
|
|
|
|
19,025
|
|
|
|
(6,327
|
)
|
|
|
12,698
|
|
|
|
7,058
|
|
Fishermans Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
9,936
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
12,621
|
|
|
|
14,777
|
|
|
|
(7,059
|
)
|
|
|
7,718
|
|
|
|
6,350
|
|
Fishermans Wharf
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-96
|
|
Clute, TX
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
7,584
|
|
|
|
5,428
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
13,012
|
|
|
|
14,269
|
|
|
|
(5,704
|
)
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
Flamingo Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Sep-97
|
|
Miami Beach, FL
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
32,191
|
|
|
|
38,399
|
|
|
|
217,720
|
|
|
|
32,239
|
|
|
|
256,071
|
|
|
|
288,310
|
|
|
|
(91,197
|
)
|
|
|
197,113
|
|
|
|
118,890
|
|
Forestlake Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-07
|
|
Daytona Beach, FL
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
8,507
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
7,884
|
|
|
|
4,735
|
|
Four Quarters Habitat
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Miami, FL
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
17,199
|
|
|
|
14,503
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
31,706
|
|
|
|
34,085
|
|
|
|
(11,365
|
)
|
|
|
22,720
|
|
|
|
11,698
|
|
Foxchase
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Alexandria, VA
|
|
|
1947
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
15,419
|
|
|
|
96,062
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
15,496
|
|
|
|
127,785
|
|
|
|
143,281
|
|
|
|
(55,566
|
)
|
|
|
87,715
|
|
|
|
184,131
|
|
Georgetown
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Framingham, MA
|
|
|
1964
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
12,351
|
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
12,351
|
|
|
|
15,259
|
|
|
|
27,610
|
|
|
|
(4,535
|
)
|
|
|
23,075
|
|
|
|
12,775
|
|
I-76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Glen at Forestlake, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-07
|
|
Daytona Beach, FL
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Granada
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Framingham, MA
|
|
|
1958
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
4,577
|
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
4,577
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
|
4,275
|
|
Grand Pointe
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-99
|
|
Columbia, MD
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
16,771
|
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
22,035
|
|
|
|
24,750
|
|
|
|
(8,144
|
)
|
|
|
16,606
|
|
|
|
16,987
|
|
Greens
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
Chandler, AZ
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
27,244
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
27,957
|
|
|
|
30,260
|
|
|
|
(12,346
|
)
|
|
|
17,914
|
|
|
|
12,855
|
|
Greenspoint at Paradise Valley
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
13,223
|
|
|
|
12,350
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
25,573
|
|
|
|
28,615
|
|
|
|
(11,541
|
)
|
|
|
17,074
|
|
|
|
16,287
|
|
Hampden Heights
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Denver, CO
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
5,893
|
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
18,569
|
|
|
|
22,022
|
|
|
|
(8,681
|
)
|
|
|
13,341
|
|
|
|
13,830
|
|
Harbour, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Melbourne, FL
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
9,337
|
|
|
|
13,445
|
|
|
|
(3,026
|
)
|
|
|
10,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heritage Park at Alta Loma
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-01
|
|
Alta Loma, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
6,428
|
|
|
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
9,884
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
|
|
7,524
|
|
|
|
7,264
|
|
Heritage Park Escondido
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Escondido, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
7,565
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
(4,118
|
)
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
Heritage Park Livermore
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Livermore, CA
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
9,170
|
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
10,513
|
|
|
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
(4,639
|
)
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
7,432
|
|
Heritage Park Montclair
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Montclair, CA
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
5,355
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
(1,873
|
)
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
Heritage Village Anaheim
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Anaheim, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
10,150
|
|
|
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
(4,777
|
)
|
|
|
7,205
|
|
|
|
8,858
|
|
Hidden Cove
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-98
|
|
Escondido, CA
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
17,615
|
|
|
|
6,980
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
24,595
|
|
|
|
27,638
|
|
|
|
(10,158
|
)
|
|
|
17,480
|
|
|
|
31,006
|
|
Hidden Cove II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-07
|
|
Escondido, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
12,730
|
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
12,849
|
|
|
|
11,884
|
|
|
|
24,733
|
|
|
|
(1,806
|
)
|
|
|
22,927
|
|
|
|
11,586
|
|
Hidden Harbour
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Melbourne, FL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
12,388
|
|
|
|
13,832
|
|
|
|
(3,471
|
)
|
|
|
10,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highcrest Townhomes
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-03
|
|
Woodridge, IL
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
3,045
|
|
|
|
13,452
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
3,045
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
17,865
|
|
|
|
(6,091
|
)
|
|
|
11,774
|
|
|
|
10,876
|
|
Hillcreste
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Century City, CA
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
33,755
|
|
|
|
47,216
|
|
|
|
25,906
|
|
|
|
35,862
|
|
|
|
71,015
|
|
|
|
106,877
|
|
|
|
(21,022
|
)
|
|
|
85,855
|
|
|
|
57,610
|
|
Hillmeade
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-94
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
16,069
|
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
29,633
|
|
|
|
32,505
|
|
|
|
(16,923
|
)
|
|
|
15,582
|
|
|
|
18,376
|
|
Horizons West Apartments
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Dec-06
|
|
Pacifica, CA
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
8,763
|
|
|
|
6,376
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
8,887
|
|
|
|
7,862
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
15,690
|
|
|
|
5,377
|
|
Hunt Club
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Gaithersburg, MD
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
17,859
|
|
|
|
13,149
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
17,859
|
|
|
|
16,747
|
|
|
|
34,606
|
|
|
|
(6,372
|
)
|
|
|
28,234
|
|
|
|
32,160
|
|
Hunt Club
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
|
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
8,537
|
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
|
|
20,457
|
|
|
|
30,799
|
|
|
|
(9,758
|
)
|
|
|
21,041
|
|
|
|
16,499
|
|
Hunters Chase
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-01
|
|
Midlothian, VA
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
7,915
|
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
11,174
|
|
|
|
19,109
|
|
|
|
(3,398
|
)
|
|
|
15,711
|
|
|
|
16,407
|
|
Hunters Crossing
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-01
|
|
Leesburg, VA
|
|
|
1967
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
7,763
|
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
11,842
|
|
|
|
14,086
|
|
|
|
(6,371
|
)
|
|
|
7,715
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
Hunters Glen IV
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Plainsboro, NJ
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
14,420
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
19,239
|
|
|
|
21,948
|
|
|
|
(9,525
|
)
|
|
|
12,423
|
|
|
|
20,191
|
|
Hunters Glen V
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Plainsboro, NJ
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
17,337
|
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
|
|
25,831
|
|
|
|
(11,087
|
)
|
|
|
14,744
|
|
|
|
24,194
|
|
Hunters Glen VI
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Plainsboro, NJ
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
15,501
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
|
|
21,576
|
|
|
|
24,363
|
|
|
|
(11,389
|
)
|
|
|
12,974
|
|
|
|
25,182
|
|
Hyde Park Tower
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-04
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
4,683
|
|
|
|
14,928
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
4,731
|
|
|
|
16,811
|
|
|
|
21,542
|
|
|
|
(2,913
|
)
|
|
|
18,629
|
|
|
|
13,781
|
|
Independence Green
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Farmington Hills, MI
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
10,293
|
|
|
|
24,586
|
|
|
|
20,189
|
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
|
|
44,912
|
|
|
|
55,068
|
|
|
|
(13,065
|
)
|
|
|
42,003
|
|
|
|
27,758
|
|
Indian Oaks
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Simi Valley, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
23,927
|
|
|
|
15,801
|
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
|
|
24,523
|
|
|
|
18,694
|
|
|
|
43,217
|
|
|
|
(5,884
|
)
|
|
|
37,333
|
|
|
|
33,171
|
|
Island Club
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Oceanside, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
18,027
|
|
|
|
28,654
|
|
|
|
11,220
|
|
|
|
18,027
|
|
|
|
39,874
|
|
|
|
57,901
|
|
|
|
(15,731
|
)
|
|
|
42,170
|
|
|
|
64,973
|
|
Island Club (Beville)
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Daytona Beach, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
6,086
|
|
|
|
8,571
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
10,705
|
|
|
|
16,792
|
|
|
|
(4,444
|
)
|
|
|
12,348
|
|
|
|
8,440
|
|
Key Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Apr-01
|
|
Alexandria, VA
|
|
|
1964
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
7,050
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
10,899
|
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
|
|
(4,859
|
)
|
|
|
7,566
|
|
|
|
10,868
|
|
Lakeside
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Lisle, IL
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
5,840
|
|
|
|
27,937
|
|
|
|
28,127
|
|
|
|
5,840
|
|
|
|
56,064
|
|
|
|
61,904
|
|
|
|
(22,153
|
)
|
|
|
39,751
|
|
|
|
29,375
|
|
Lakeside at Vinings Mountain
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
11,863
|
|
|
|
15,149
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
27,012
|
|
|
|
29,121
|
|
|
|
(10,884
|
)
|
|
|
18,237
|
|
|
|
9,666
|
|
Lakeside Place
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
6,160
|
|
|
|
34,151
|
|
|
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
6,160
|
|
|
|
50,093
|
|
|
|
56,253
|
|
|
|
(21,654
|
)
|
|
|
34,599
|
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
Lamplighter Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Bellevue, WA
|
|
|
1967
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
9,272
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
13,422
|
|
|
|
15,647
|
|
|
|
(6,442
|
)
|
|
|
9,205
|
|
|
|
10,576
|
|
Latrobe
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-03
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
9,103
|
|
|
|
15,543
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
24,646
|
|
|
|
28,105
|
|
|
|
(10,353
|
)
|
|
|
17,752
|
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
Lazy Hollow
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
Columbia, MD
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
12,181
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
13,137
|
|
|
|
15,561
|
|
|
|
(5,520
|
)
|
|
|
10,041
|
|
|
|
7,867
|
|
I-77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Leahy Square
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-07
|
|
Redwood City, CA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
15,352
|
|
|
|
7,909
|
|
|
|
1,755
|
|
|
|
15,444
|
|
|
|
9,572
|
|
|
|
25,016
|
|
|
|
(1,631
|
)
|
|
|
23,385
|
|
|
|
15,185
|
|
Lewis Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Carbondale, IL
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
12,193
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
15,379
|
|
|
|
16,783
|
|
|
|
(8,520
|
)
|
|
|
8,263
|
|
|
|
3,981
|
|
Lincoln Place Garden
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-04
|
|
Venice, CA
|
|
|
1951
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
43,979
|
|
|
|
10,439
|
|
|
|
86,174
|
|
|
|
42,894
|
|
|
|
97,698
|
|
|
|
140,592
|
|
|
|
(1,691
|
)
|
|
|
138,901
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
Lodge at Chattahoochee, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Sandy Springs, GA
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
16,370
|
|
|
|
21,615
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
37,985
|
|
|
|
40,305
|
|
|
|
(15,095
|
)
|
|
|
25,210
|
|
|
|
11,087
|
|
Los Arboles
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-97
|
|
Chandler, AZ
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
9,504
|
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
12,701
|
|
|
|
14,363
|
|
|
|
(5,741
|
)
|
|
|
8,622
|
|
|
|
8,086
|
|
Malibu Canyon
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Calabasas, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
66,257
|
|
|
|
53,438
|
|
|
|
34,982
|
|
|
|
69,834
|
|
|
|
84,843
|
|
|
|
154,677
|
|
|
|
(30,295
|
)
|
|
|
124,382
|
|
|
|
97,604
|
|
Maple Bay
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-99
|
|
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
16,141
|
|
|
|
29,935
|
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
46,076
|
|
|
|
48,674
|
|
|
|
(15,809
|
)
|
|
|
32,865
|
|
|
|
33,548
|
|
Mariners Cove
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
San Diego, CA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,861
|
|
|
|
7,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,132
|
|
|
|
74,132
|
|
|
|
(18,728
|
)
|
|
|
55,404
|
|
|
|
5,813
|
|
Meadow Creek
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
Boulder, CO
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
24,532
|
|
|
|
6,358
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
30,890
|
|
|
|
32,325
|
|
|
|
(13,197
|
)
|
|
|
19,128
|
|
|
|
24,071
|
|
Merrill House
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Falls Church, VA
|
|
|
1962
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
10,831
|
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
16,694
|
|
|
|
18,530
|
|
|
|
(4,452
|
)
|
|
|
14,078
|
|
|
|
15,600
|
|
Mesa Royale
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
Mesa, AZ
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
9,585
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
14,986
|
|
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
|
|
9,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
Montecito
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
6,896
|
|
|
|
4,958
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
11,855
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
(6,165
|
)
|
|
|
6,957
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
Monterey Grove
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jun-08
|
|
San Jose, CA
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
34,175
|
|
|
|
21,939
|
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
34,325
|
|
|
|
23,861
|
|
|
|
58,186
|
|
|
|
(1,806
|
)
|
|
|
56,380
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Oak Park Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Lansing, MI
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
16,771
|
|
|
|
7,340
|
|
|
|
10,048
|
|
|
|
24,111
|
|
|
|
34,159
|
|
|
|
(12,777
|
)
|
|
|
21,382
|
|
|
|
23,487
|
|
Ocean Oaks
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Port Orange, FL
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
12,855
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
16,097
|
|
|
|
18,229
|
|
|
|
(6,492
|
)
|
|
|
11,737
|
|
|
|
10,295
|
|
One Lytle Place
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Cincinnati ,OH
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
21,800
|
|
|
|
12,551
|
|
|
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
34,351
|
|
|
|
37,013
|
|
|
|
(12,139
|
)
|
|
|
24,874
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
Pacific Bay Vistas
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
San Bruno, CA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
62,460
|
|
|
|
22,184
|
|
|
|
22,994
|
|
|
|
65,353
|
|
|
|
88,347
|
|
|
|
(55,442
|
)
|
|
|
32,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacifica Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-06
|
|
Pacifica, CA
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
12,770
|
|
|
|
6,579
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
9,562
|
|
|
|
22,532
|
|
|
|
(2,205
|
)
|
|
|
20,327
|
|
|
|
11,260
|
|
Palazzo at Park La Brea, The
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Feb-04
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
47,822
|
|
|
|
125,464
|
|
|
|
8,804
|
|
|
|
48,362
|
|
|
|
133,728
|
|
|
|
182,090
|
|
|
|
(30,135
|
)
|
|
|
151,955
|
|
|
|
125,554
|
|
Palazzo East at Park La Brea, The
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
61,004
|
|
|
|
136,503
|
|
|
|
22,142
|
|
|
|
72,578
|
|
|
|
147,071
|
|
|
|
219,649
|
|
|
|
(26,968
|
)
|
|
|
192,681
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Paradise Palms
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-94
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
6,959
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
10,474
|
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
(5,539
|
)
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Park at Cedar Lawn, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-96
|
|
Galveston, TX
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
|
|
7,131
|
|
|
|
(2,539
|
)
|
|
|
4,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
Park Towne Place
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1959
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
10,451
|
|
|
|
47,301
|
|
|
|
54,589
|
|
|
|
10,451
|
|
|
|
101,890
|
|
|
|
112,341
|
|
|
|
(23,850
|
)
|
|
|
88,491
|
|
|
|
86,343
|
|
Parktown Townhouses
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Deer Park, TX
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
|
|
12,052
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
|
|
21,462
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
(8,186
|
)
|
|
|
15,846
|
|
|
|
5,618
|
|
Parkway
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-00
|
|
Willamsburg, VA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
2,834
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
5,588
|
|
|
|
5,974
|
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
|
9,273
|
|
Pathfinder Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Fremont, CA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
19,595
|
|
|
|
14,838
|
|
|
|
8,147
|
|
|
|
19,595
|
|
|
|
22,985
|
|
|
|
42,580
|
|
|
|
(3,163
|
)
|
|
|
39,417
|
|
|
|
19,348
|
|
Peachtree Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-96
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1962
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
4,683
|
|
|
|
11,713
|
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
|
|
4,683
|
|
|
|
21,613
|
|
|
|
26,296
|
|
|
|
(9,890
|
)
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
|
|
9,543
|
|
Peak at Vinings Mountain, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
13,660
|
|
|
|
17,606
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
31,266
|
|
|
|
33,917
|
|
|
|
(12,410
|
)
|
|
|
21,507
|
|
|
|
10,412
|
|
Peakview Place
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Englewood, CO
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
|
|
18,734
|
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
|
|
23,281
|
|
|
|
26,721
|
|
|
|
(15,330
|
)
|
|
|
11,391
|
|
|
|
12,711
|
|
Pebble Point
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
6,883
|
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
9,495
|
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
|
6,759
|
|
|
|
5,430
|
|
Peppertree
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Cypress, CA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
7,835
|
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
7,807
|
|
|
|
15,837
|
|
|
|
(2,743
|
)
|
|
|
13,094
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
Pine Lake Terrace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
6,035
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
7,979
|
|
|
|
12,104
|
|
|
|
(2,531
|
)
|
|
|
9,573
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Pine Shadows
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Tempe, AZ
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
15,624
|
|
|
|
17,719
|
|
|
|
(7,375
|
)
|
|
|
10,344
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
Pines, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-98
|
|
Palm Bay, FL
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
6,034
|
|
|
|
6,637
|
|
|
|
(2,415
|
)
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
Plantation Gardens
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Plantation ,FL
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
19,443
|
|
|
|
6,204
|
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
25,647
|
|
|
|
29,420
|
|
|
|
(10,871
|
)
|
|
|
18,549
|
|
|
|
24,141
|
|
Post Ridge
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-00
|
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
6,712
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
10,229
|
|
|
|
12,112
|
|
|
|
(4,456
|
)
|
|
|
7,656
|
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
Ramblewood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-99
|
|
Wyoming, MI
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
8,607
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
62,958
|
|
|
|
71,619
|
|
|
|
(12,161
|
)
|
|
|
59,458
|
|
|
|
34,944
|
|
Ravensworth Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jun-04
|
|
Annandale, VA
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
|
17,157
|
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
|
19,429
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
|
|
(9,501
|
)
|
|
|
13,383
|
|
|
|
20,685
|
|
I-78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Reflections
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
|
13,684
|
|
|
|
5,255
|
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
|
18,939
|
|
|
|
34,927
|
|
|
|
(7,638
|
)
|
|
|
27,289
|
|
|
|
39,451
|
|
Reflections
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
West Palm Beach, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
|
9,984
|
|
|
|
4,113
|
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
|
14,097
|
|
|
|
19,601
|
|
|
|
(5,272
|
)
|
|
|
14,329
|
|
|
|
9,190
|
|
Reflections
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Casselberry, FL
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
10,491
|
|
|
|
4,233
|
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
14,724
|
|
|
|
18,630
|
|
|
|
(4,662
|
)
|
|
|
13,968
|
|
|
|
10,700
|
|
Regency Oaks
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Fern Park, FL
|
|
|
1965
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
9,905
|
|
|
|
8,398
|
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
18,303
|
|
|
|
20,135
|
|
|
|
(10,017
|
)
|
|
|
10,118
|
|
|
|
11,134
|
|
Remington at Ponte Vedra Lakes
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-06
|
|
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
18,576
|
|
|
|
18,650
|
|
|
|
2,242
|
|
|
|
18,795
|
|
|
|
20,673
|
|
|
|
39,468
|
|
|
|
(3,586
|
)
|
|
|
35,882
|
|
|
|
24,695
|
|
River Club
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
Edgewater, NJ
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
30,578
|
|
|
|
30,638
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
30,579
|
|
|
|
32,547
|
|
|
|
63,126
|
|
|
|
(6,208
|
)
|
|
|
56,918
|
|
|
|
39,373
|
|
River Reach
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Naples, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
17,728
|
|
|
|
18,337
|
|
|
|
6,365
|
|
|
|
17,728
|
|
|
|
24,702
|
|
|
|
42,430
|
|
|
|
(10,002
|
)
|
|
|
32,428
|
|
|
|
23,452
|
|
Riverbend Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-01
|
|
Arlington, TX
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
9,091
|
|
|
|
9,984
|
|
|
|
(3,967
|
)
|
|
|
6,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riverloft
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1910
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
|
11,287
|
|
|
|
31,118
|
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
|
|
42,405
|
|
|
|
44,525
|
|
|
|
(15,462
|
)
|
|
|
29,063
|
|
|
|
19,951
|
|
Riverside
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Alexandria ,VA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
65,474
|
|
|
|
76,986
|
|
|
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
142,460
|
|
|
|
152,893
|
|
|
|
(59,333
|
)
|
|
|
93,560
|
|
|
|
96,289
|
|
Rosewood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Camarillo, CA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
8,060
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
12,430
|
|
|
|
10,165
|
|
|
|
22,595
|
|
|
|
(3,320
|
)
|
|
|
19,275
|
|
|
|
17,900
|
|
Royal Crest Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Fall River, MA
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
12,044
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
13,997
|
|
|
|
19,829
|
|
|
|
(5,694
|
)
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
|
|
12,161
|
|
Royal Crest Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Warwick, RI
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
22,433
|
|
|
|
24,095
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
22,433
|
|
|
|
29,391
|
|
|
|
51,824
|
|
|
|
(12,162
|
)
|
|
|
39,662
|
|
|
|
37,890
|
|
Royal Crest Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Marlborough, MA
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
25,178
|
|
|
|
28,786
|
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
25,178
|
|
|
|
32,621
|
|
|
|
57,799
|
|
|
|
(13,594
|
)
|
|
|
44,205
|
|
|
|
35,400
|
|
Royal Crest Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
North Andover, MA
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
51,292
|
|
|
|
36,808
|
|
|
|
9,632
|
|
|
|
51,292
|
|
|
|
46,440
|
|
|
|
97,732
|
|
|
|
(18,797
|
)
|
|
|
78,935
|
|
|
|
60,305
|
|
Royal Crest Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Nashua, NH
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
68,231
|
|
|
|
45,562
|
|
|
|
11,187
|
|
|
|
68,231
|
|
|
|
56,749
|
|
|
|
124,980
|
|
|
|
(25,003
|
)
|
|
|
99,977
|
|
|
|
50,667
|
|
Runaway Bay
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Lantana, FL
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
16,052
|
|
|
|
7,643
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
23,695
|
|
|
|
29,629
|
|
|
|
(7,842
|
)
|
|
|
21,787
|
|
|
|
21,644
|
|
Runaway Bay
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-02
|
|
Pinellas Park, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
7,045
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
8,876
|
|
|
|
10,760
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
8,358
|
|
|
|
9,004
|
|
Savannah Trace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Shaumburg, IL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
20,731
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
24,732
|
|
|
|
38,692
|
|
|
|
(8,502
|
)
|
|
|
30,190
|
|
|
|
22,282
|
|
Scandia
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
10,540
|
|
|
|
9,852
|
|
|
|
12,780
|
|
|
|
10,539
|
|
|
|
22,633
|
|
|
|
33,172
|
|
|
|
(11,260
|
)
|
|
|
21,912
|
|
|
|
19,163
|
|
Scotchollow
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
San Mateo, CA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
49,474
|
|
|
|
17,756
|
|
|
|
7,733
|
|
|
|
49,473
|
|
|
|
25,490
|
|
|
|
74,963
|
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
|
|
71,835
|
|
|
|
49,605
|
|
Scottsdale Gateway I
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-97
|
|
Tempe, AZ
|
|
|
1965
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
8,017
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
11,376
|
|
|
|
11,967
|
|
|
|
(4,075
|
)
|
|
|
7,892
|
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
Scottsdale Gateway II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-97
|
|
Tempe, AZ
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
13,927
|
|
|
|
23,353
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
39,738
|
|
|
|
(15,204
|
)
|
|
|
24,534
|
|
|
|
5,087
|
|
Shadow Creek
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Mesa, AZ
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
11,886
|
|
|
|
3,790
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
15,676
|
|
|
|
17,692
|
|
|
|
(7,685
|
)
|
|
|
10,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shenandoah Crossing
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Fairfax, VA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
18,492
|
|
|
|
57,197
|
|
|
|
7,499
|
|
|
|
18,492
|
|
|
|
64,696
|
|
|
|
83,188
|
|
|
|
(27,715
|
)
|
|
|
55,473
|
|
|
|
69,724
|
|
Signal Pointe
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Winter Park, FL
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
11,359
|
|
|
|
21,447
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
32,806
|
|
|
|
35,188
|
|
|
|
(10,480
|
)
|
|
|
24,708
|
|
|
|
18,596
|
|
Signature Point
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-96
|
|
League City, TX
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
17,579
|
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
2,810
|
|
|
|
20,389
|
|
|
|
23,199
|
|
|
|
(6,784
|
)
|
|
|
16,415
|
|
|
|
10,823
|
|
Springwoods at Lake Ridge
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-02
|
|
Woodbridge, VA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
7,284
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
|
|
14,149
|
|
|
|
(1,944
|
)
|
|
|
12,205
|
|
|
|
14,502
|
|
Spyglass at Cedar Cove
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Lexington Park, MD
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
3,241
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
3,241
|
|
|
|
7,573
|
|
|
|
10,814
|
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
7,577
|
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
Stafford
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
1889
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
|
|
7,869
|
|
|
|
(3,524
|
)
|
|
|
4,345
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
Steeplechase
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Largo, MD
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
16,111
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
19,412
|
|
|
|
23,087
|
|
|
|
(7,106
|
)
|
|
|
15,981
|
|
|
|
23,600
|
|
Steeplechase
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-02
|
|
Plano, TX
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
10,510
|
|
|
|
6,974
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
17,484
|
|
|
|
24,540
|
|
|
|
(5,158
|
)
|
|
|
19,382
|
|
|
|
13,987
|
|
Sterling Apartment Homes, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1962
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
55,364
|
|
|
|
17,358
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
72,722
|
|
|
|
81,593
|
|
|
|
(30,782
|
)
|
|
|
50,811
|
|
|
|
77,915
|
|
Stone Creek Club
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-00
|
|
Germantown, MD
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
13,593
|
|
|
|
9,347
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
13,593
|
|
|
|
12,295
|
|
|
|
25,888
|
|
|
|
(6,743
|
)
|
|
|
19,145
|
|
|
|
24,900
|
|
Sun Lake
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Lake Mary, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
25,543
|
|
|
|
30,903
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
56,446
|
|
|
|
60,997
|
|
|
|
(20,010
|
)
|
|
|
40,987
|
|
|
|
35,727
|
|
Sun River Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Tempe ,AZ
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
13,303
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
17,191
|
|
|
|
19,558
|
|
|
|
(8,524
|
)
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
10,569
|
|
Tamarac Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Denver, CO
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
3,928
|
|
|
|
23,491
|
|
|
|
8,089
|
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
31,285
|
|
|
|
35,508
|
|
|
|
(16,205
|
)
|
|
|
19,303
|
|
|
|
18,389
|
|
Tamarind Bay
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
St. Petersburg, FL
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
4,987
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
11,297
|
|
|
|
12,388
|
|
|
|
(5,368
|
)
|
|
|
7,020
|
|
|
|
6,925
|
|
I-79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Tatum Gardens
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
9,083
|
|
|
|
10,406
|
|
|
|
(4,706
|
)
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
7,403
|
|
The Bluffs at Pacifica
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-06
|
|
Pacifica, CA
|
|
|
1963
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
7,975
|
|
|
|
4,131
|
|
|
|
7,635
|
|
|
|
8,108
|
|
|
|
11,633
|
|
|
|
19,741
|
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
|
18,674
|
|
|
|
6,428
|
|
Timbertree
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-97
|
|
Phoenix, AZ
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
6,209
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
19,209
|
|
|
|
21,501
|
|
|
|
(9,830
|
)
|
|
|
11,671
|
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
Towers Of Westchester Park, The
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
College Park, MD
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
15,198
|
|
|
|
22,029
|
|
|
|
4,504
|
|
|
|
15,198
|
|
|
|
26,533
|
|
|
|
41,731
|
|
|
|
(3,946
|
)
|
|
|
37,785
|
|
|
|
27,667
|
|
Township At Highlands
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Nov-96
|
|
Centennial, CO
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
9,773
|
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
15,970
|
|
|
|
17,506
|
|
|
|
(6,955
|
)
|
|
|
10,551
|
|
|
|
16,640
|
|
Twin Lake Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Westmont, IL
|
|
|
1969
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
3,268
|
|
|
|
18,763
|
|
|
|
23,625
|
|
|
|
3,268
|
|
|
|
42,388
|
|
|
|
45,656
|
|
|
|
(15,984
|
)
|
|
|
29,672
|
|
|
|
9,255
|
|
Twin Lakes
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
Palm Harbor, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
17,434
|
|
|
|
19,496
|
|
|
|
(7,652
|
)
|
|
|
11,844
|
|
|
|
10,604
|
|
Vantage Pointe
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Swampscott, MA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
10,089
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
(3,498
|
)
|
|
|
12,691
|
|
|
|
7,385
|
|
Verandahs at Hunt Club
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jul-02
|
|
Apopka, FL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
7,724
|
|
|
|
2,974
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
10,698
|
|
|
|
12,969
|
|
|
|
(2,641
|
)
|
|
|
10,328
|
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
Views at Vinings Mountain, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
17,235
|
|
|
|
17,845
|
|
|
|
(7,559
|
)
|
|
|
10,286
|
|
|
|
13,757
|
|
Villa Del Sol
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Norwalk, CA
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
7,476
|
|
|
|
7,191
|
|
|
|
14,667
|
|
|
|
(2,670
|
)
|
|
|
11,997
|
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
Village Crossing
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
West Palm Beach, FL
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
8,188
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
11,129
|
|
|
|
12,747
|
|
|
|
(5,497
|
)
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Village in the Woods
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Cypress, TX
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
15,787
|
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
26,017
|
|
|
|
29,474
|
|
|
|
(12,765
|
)
|
|
|
16,709
|
|
|
|
19,451
|
|
Village of Pennbrook
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-98
|
|
Levittown, PA
|
|
|
1969
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
10,229
|
|
|
|
38,222
|
|
|
|
13,539
|
|
|
|
10,229
|
|
|
|
51,761
|
|
|
|
61,990
|
|
|
|
(21,542
|
)
|
|
|
40,448
|
|
|
|
48,419
|
|
Villages of Baymeadows
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
|
|
53,735
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
87,692
|
|
|
|
92,551
|
|
|
|
(40,263
|
)
|
|
|
52,288
|
|
|
|
38,050
|
|
Villas at Park La Brea, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
8,621
|
|
|
|
48,871
|
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
8,630
|
|
|
|
52,465
|
|
|
|
61,095
|
|
|
|
(12,802
|
)
|
|
|
48,293
|
|
|
|
30,564
|
|
Vista Del Lagos
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Chandler, AZ
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
4,952
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
8,394
|
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
(3,431
|
)
|
|
|
5,767
|
|
|
|
11,783
|
|
Waterford Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Bridgewater, MA
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
28,585
|
|
|
|
28,102
|
|
|
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
29,110
|
|
|
|
33,168
|
|
|
|
62,278
|
|
|
|
(15,640
|
)
|
|
|
46,638
|
|
|
|
40,542
|
|
Waterways Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jun-97
|
|
Aventura, FL
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
4,504
|
|
|
|
11,064
|
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
|
|
4,504
|
|
|
|
14,747
|
|
|
|
19,251
|
|
|
|
(6,456
|
)
|
|
|
12,795
|
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
Waverly Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-08
|
|
Brighton, MA
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
7,696
|
|
|
|
11,347
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
12,311
|
|
|
|
20,231
|
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
19,508
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
West Winds
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Orlando, FL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
14,511
|
|
|
|
16,835
|
|
|
|
(4,829
|
)
|
|
|
12,006
|
|
|
|
12,776
|
|
Westway Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
11,384
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
14,556
|
|
|
|
17,477
|
|
|
|
(6,586
|
)
|
|
|
10,891
|
|
|
|
7,677
|
|
Wexford Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Aug-02
|
|
Worcester, MA
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
|
|
17,939
|
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
|
|
20,021
|
|
|
|
26,360
|
|
|
|
(7,250
|
)
|
|
|
19,110
|
|
|
|
13,924
|
|
Willow Bend
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Rolling Meadows, IL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
15,437
|
|
|
|
26,391
|
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
41,828
|
|
|
|
44,545
|
|
|
|
(13,960
|
)
|
|
|
30,585
|
|
|
|
19,876
|
|
Willow Park on Lake Adelaide
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Altamonte Springs, FL
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
|
|
3,266
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
10,624
|
|
|
|
11,848
|
|
|
|
(5,611
|
)
|
|
|
6,237
|
|
|
|
6,804
|
|
Windrift
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Oceanside, CA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
24,960
|
|
|
|
17,590
|
|
|
|
18,667
|
|
|
|
24,960
|
|
|
|
36,257
|
|
|
|
61,217
|
|
|
|
(15,443
|
)
|
|
|
45,774
|
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
Windrift
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Orlando, FL
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
10,029
|
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
15,524
|
|
|
|
19,220
|
|
|
|
(5,710
|
)
|
|
|
13,510
|
|
|
|
17,094
|
|
Windsor Crossing
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-00
|
|
Newport News, VA
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
4,409
|
|
|
|
(2,102
|
)
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
Windsor Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-01
|
|
Woodbridge, VA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
|
15,970
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
|
|
22,421
|
|
|
|
(6,430
|
)
|
|
|
15,991
|
|
|
|
13,444
|
|
Woodcreek
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Mesa, AZ
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
15,886
|
|
|
|
4,487
|
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
20,373
|
|
|
|
22,799
|
|
|
|
(10,400
|
)
|
|
|
12,399
|
|
|
|
19,449
|
|
Woods of Burnsville
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-04
|
|
Burnsville, MN
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
20,819
|
|
|
|
24,773
|
|
|
|
(7,429
|
)
|
|
|
17,344
|
|
|
|
16,580
|
|
Woods of Inverness
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
10,978
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
14,838
|
|
|
|
16,984
|
|
|
|
(7,194
|
)
|
|
|
9,790
|
|
|
|
5,878
|
|
Woods Of Williamsburg
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Williamsburg, VA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
4,530
|
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
(3,309
|
)
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
Yacht Club at Brickell
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Dec-03
|
|
Miami, FL
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
31,363
|
|
|
|
32,214
|
|
|
|
4,297
|
|
|
|
31,363
|
|
|
|
36,511
|
|
|
|
67,874
|
|
|
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
|
61,974
|
|
|
|
37,804
|
|
Yorktown Apartments
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Dec-99
|
|
Lombard, IL
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
|
|
18,163
|
|
|
|
16,098
|
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
|
34,177
|
|
|
|
37,232
|
|
|
|
(10,538
|
)
|
|
|
26,694
|
|
|
|
22,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Conventional Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,377
|
|
|
|
1,970,960
|
|
|
|
3,818,111
|
|
|
|
2,152,391
|
|
|
|
2,027,400
|
|
|
|
5,914,062
|
|
|
|
7,941,462
|
|
|
|
(2,107,330
|
)
|
|
|
5,834,132
|
|
|
|
4,691,425
|
|
I-80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Affordable Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Hallows
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
29,770
|
|
|
|
20,124
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
49,904
|
|
|
|
51,242
|
|
|
|
(15,590
|
)
|
|
|
35,652
|
|
|
|
21,219
|
|
Alliance Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Alliance, OH
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
Arvada House
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Nov-04
|
|
Arvada, CO
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
|
|
(1,304
|
)
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
|
|
4,152
|
|
Ashland Manor
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Toledo, OH
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
Bannock Arms
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Boise, ID
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
Bayview
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jun-05
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
15,265
|
|
|
|
16,548
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
32,836
|
|
|
|
(9,118
|
)
|
|
|
23,718
|
|
|
|
12,520
|
|
Beacon Hill
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Hillsdale, MI
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
7,044
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
13,930
|
|
|
|
15,023
|
|
|
|
(3,236
|
)
|
|
|
11,787
|
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
Bedford House
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Falmouth, KY
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
Benjamin Banneker Plaza
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Chester, PA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
(2,890
|
)
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
Berger Apartments
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
New Haven, CT
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
4,657
|
|
|
|
2,229
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
6,886
|
|
|
|
8,038
|
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
|
5,958
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
Biltmore Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Dayton, OH
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
|
6,411
|
|
|
|
13,073
|
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
|
19,484
|
|
|
|
21,297
|
|
|
|
(8,817
|
)
|
|
|
12,480
|
|
|
|
10,648
|
|
Blakewood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-05
|
|
Statesboro, GA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
Bolton North
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
6,569
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
(2,347
|
)
|
|
|
6,321
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
Burchwood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Berea, KY
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
Butternut Creek
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Charlotte, MI
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
3,957
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
8,079
|
|
|
|
(2,239
|
)
|
|
|
5,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cache Creek Apartment Homes
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-04
|
|
Clearlake, CA
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
9,405
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
|
|
11,444
|
|
|
|
(2,866
|
)
|
|
|
8,578
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
California Square I
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Louisville, KY
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
6,227
|
|
|
|
6,381
|
|
|
|
(3,600
|
)
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
Canterbury Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Worcester, MA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
4,557
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
6,060
|
|
|
|
(3,681
|
)
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
3,966
|
|
Carriage House
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Dec-06
|
|
Petersburg, VA
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
6,373
|
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
(1,407
|
)
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Casa de Las Hermanitas
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
8,724
|
|
|
|
10,603
|
|
|
|
(1,118
|
)
|
|
|
9,485
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
Castlewood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Davenport, IA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
City Line
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Newport News, VA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,014
|
|
|
|
7,172
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
9,186
|
|
|
|
9,686
|
|
|
|
(2,046
|
)
|
|
|
7,640
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
Clisby Towers
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Macon, GA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
(1,677
|
)
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
Club, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lexington, NC
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
(1,978
|
)
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Coatesville Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Coatesville, PA
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
Cold Spring Homes
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Cold Springs, KY
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
Community Circle II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Cleveland, OH
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
5,503
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
(3,265
|
)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
Copperwood I Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-06
|
|
The Woodlands, TX
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
8,373
|
|
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
13,262
|
|
|
|
13,625
|
|
|
|
(8,167
|
)
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
5,590
|
|
Copperwood II Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-05
|
|
The Woodlands, TX
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
5,552
|
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
9,419
|
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
Country Club Heights
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Quincy, IL
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
10,557
|
|
|
|
11,232
|
|
|
|
(3,837
|
)
|
|
|
7,395
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
Country Commons
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Bensalem, PA
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
17,657
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
19,965
|
|
|
|
21,818
|
|
|
|
(10,649
|
)
|
|
|
11,169
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
Courtyard
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
4,876
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
6,686
|
|
|
|
(3,126
|
)
|
|
|
3,560
|
|
|
|
3,830
|
|
Crevenna Oaks
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Burke, VA
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
|
|
(945
|
)
|
|
|
4,478
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
Crockett Manor
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Trenton, TN
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
Cumberland Court
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Harrisburg, PA
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
(3,282
|
)
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
Daugette Tower
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Gadsden, AL
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
2,178
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
3,922
|
|
|
|
4,462
|
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Delhaven Manor
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Jackson, MS
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
(1,621
|
)
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
3,758
|
|
I-81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Denny Place
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
North Hollywood, CA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
Douglas Landing
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,989
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5,011
|
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Elmwood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Athens, AL
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
(1,673
|
)
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Fairburn And Gordon II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1969
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
(1,469
|
)
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Fairwood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Carmichael, CA
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
(3,523
|
)
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
Fountain Place
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Connersville, IN
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
4,967
|
|
|
|
5,414
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
Fox Run
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Orange, TX
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
3,438
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
Foxfire
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Jackson, MI
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
9,132
|
|
|
|
(5,247
|
)
|
|
|
3,885
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
Franklin Square School Apts
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
1888
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
Friendset Apartments
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Brooklyn, NY
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
16,825
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
18,562
|
|
|
|
19,112
|
|
|
|
(10,414
|
)
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
|
|
14,404
|
|
Frio
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Pearsall, TX
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
|
|
(1,728
|
)
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
Gates Manor
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Clinton, TN
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
|
|
3,372
|
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
Gateway Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Hillsborough, NC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
Glens, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Rock Hill, SC
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
4,135
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
6,114
|
|
|
|
(3,627
|
)
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
Greenbriar
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
(2,491
|
)
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
Hamlin Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
North Hollywood, CA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
Hanover Square
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
11,656
|
|
|
|
(6,267
|
)
|
|
|
5,389
|
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
Harris Park Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Rochester, NY
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
3,887
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Hatillo Housing
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Hatillo, PR
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
2,875
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
Hemet Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Hemet, CA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
6,077
|
|
|
|
6,497
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
|
|
4,316
|
|
Henna Townhomes
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Round Rock, TX
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
12,893
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
12,977
|
|
|
|
14,024
|
|
|
|
(2,641
|
)
|
|
|
11,383
|
|
|
|
6,172
|
|
Heritage House
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lewisburg, PA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
3,382
|
|
|
|
3,560
|
|
|
|
(2,034
|
)
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
Hopkins Village
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Sep-03
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
5,973
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
10,091
|
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
Hudson Gardens
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Pasadena, CA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
Indio Gardens
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Oct-06
|
|
Indio, CA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
8,759
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
12,914
|
|
|
|
13,689
|
|
|
|
(1,213
|
)
|
|
|
12,476
|
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
Ingram Square
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
San Antonio, TX
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
5,716
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
8,853
|
|
|
|
9,483
|
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
8,145
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
Jenny Lind Hall
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Springfield, MO
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
JFK Towers
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Durham, NC
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
7,970
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
8,743
|
|
|
|
9,493
|
|
|
|
(4,678
|
)
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
|
|
5,796
|
|
Kephart Plaza
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lock Haven, PA
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
4,867
|
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
King Bell Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Milwaukie, OR
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
Kirkwood House
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Sep-04
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
9,358
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
15,762
|
|
|
|
17,037
|
|
|
|
(1,929
|
)
|
|
|
15,108
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Kubasek Trinity Manor (The Hollows)
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Yonkers, NY
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
8,308
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
10,096
|
|
|
|
10,150
|
|
|
|
(5,033
|
)
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
La Salle
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
19,568
|
|
|
|
16,650
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
36,193
|
|
|
|
38,059
|
|
|
|
(12,408
|
)
|
|
|
25,651
|
|
|
|
15,992
|
|
La Vista
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Concord, CA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
9,236
|
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
|
8,327
|
|
|
|
5,499
|
|
Lafayette Square
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Camden, SC
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
2,096
|
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Lakeview Arms
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Poughkeepsie, NY
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
(2,182
|
)
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
Landau
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-05
|
|
Clinton, SC
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Laurelwood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Morristown, TN
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
I-82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Lock Haven Gardens
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lock Haven, PA
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
6,651
|
|
|
|
7,814
|
|
|
|
(4,643
|
)
|
|
|
3,171
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
Locust House
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Westminster, MD
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
Long Meadow
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Cheraw, SC
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Loring Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
7,445
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
15,443
|
|
|
|
16,329
|
|
|
|
(4,248
|
)
|
|
|
12,081
|
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
Loring Towers Apartments
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Sep-03
|
|
Salem, MA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
14,050
|
|
|
|
6,414
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
20,453
|
|
|
|
20,593
|
|
|
|
(3,664
|
)
|
|
|
16,929
|
|
|
|
16,177
|
|
Lynnhaven
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Durham, NC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
2,839
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
Michigan Beach
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
1958
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
10,797
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
11,554
|
|
|
|
13,779
|
|
|
|
(3,296
|
)
|
|
|
10,483
|
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
Mill Pond
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Taunton, MA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Miramar Housing
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Ponce, PR
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
|
|
(2,946
|
)
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
Montblanc Gardens
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Dec-03
|
|
Yauco, PR
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
4,818
|
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
2,740
|
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
Moss Gardens
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lafayette, LA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
(3,058
|
)
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
New Baltimore
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
New Baltimore, MI
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
7,506
|
|
|
|
8,402
|
|
|
|
(1,459
|
)
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
Newberry Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
7,632
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
8,091
|
|
|
|
9,471
|
|
|
|
(2,739
|
)
|
|
|
6,732
|
|
|
|
7,399
|
|
Northlake Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
Lima, OH
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
(1,736
|
)
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
Northpoint
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
1921
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
14,334
|
|
|
|
16,403
|
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
|
30,507
|
|
|
|
33,017
|
|
|
|
(14,624
|
)
|
|
|
18,393
|
|
|
|
19,556
|
|
Northwinds, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Wytheville, VA
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Oakbrook
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-08
|
|
Topeka, KS
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
6,207
|
|
|
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
(2,773
|
)
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Oakwood Manor
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Milan, TN
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
ONeil
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Troy, NY
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
|
(3,278
|
)
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
Orange Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Hermitage, PA
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
1,833
|
|
Overbrook Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Chillicothe, OH
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
(1,377
|
)
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
Oxford House
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Deactur, IL
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
(1,932
|
)
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
Palm Springs Senior
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Palm Springs, CA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,745
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,402
|
|
|
|
12,402
|
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
|
|
10,620
|
|
|
|
6,902
|
|
Panorama Park
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Bakersfield, CA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
6,415
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
|
|
5,780
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
Parc Chateau I
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lithonia, GA
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Parc Chateau II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lithonia, GA
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
(2,522
|
)
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
Park Joplin Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Joplin, MO
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
8,847
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
8,849
|
|
|
|
9,845
|
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
Park Place
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jun-05
|
|
St Louis, MO
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
9,758
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
16,122
|
|
|
|
16,827
|
|
|
|
(8,022
|
)
|
|
|
8,805
|
|
|
|
9,572
|
|
Park Vista
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-05
|
|
Anaheim, CA
|
|
|
1958
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
25,929
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
30,392
|
|
|
|
36,547
|
|
|
|
(6,356
|
)
|
|
|
30,191
|
|
|
|
37,757
|
|
Parkview
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Sacramento, CA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
7,019
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
9,795
|
|
|
|
10,940
|
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
9,484
|
|
|
|
6,198
|
|
Parkways, The
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jun-04
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
1925
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
23,257
|
|
|
|
17,401
|
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
40,915
|
|
|
|
44,342
|
|
|
|
(12,211
|
)
|
|
|
32,131
|
|
|
|
21,927
|
|
Patman Switch
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Hughes Springs, TX
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
Pavilion
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,416
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,681
|
|
|
|
16,681
|
|
|
|
(4,111
|
)
|
|
|
12,570
|
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
Peachwood Place
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Waycross, GA
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
Pinebluff Village
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Salisbury, MD
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
7,177
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
7,862
|
|
|
|
8,974
|
|
|
|
(5,627
|
)
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
Pinewood Place
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Toledo, OH
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
(1,229
|
)
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
2,001
|
|
Pleasant Hills
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
2,631
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
6,092
|
|
|
|
7,321
|
|
|
|
(1,810
|
)
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
Plummer Village
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
North Hills, CA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
4,217
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
(1,670
|
)
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
I-83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Portner Place
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
6,428
|
|
Post Street Apartments
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Yonkers, NY
|
|
|
1930
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
3,878
|
|
|
|
(2,297
|
)
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
Pride Gardens
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Flora, MS
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
(1,454
|
)
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
Rancho California
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Temecula, CA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
5,462
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
5,718
|
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
|
|
(2,797
|
)
|
|
|
3,409
|
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
Ridgewood (La Loma)
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Sacramento, CA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
7,367
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
7,560
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
7,368
|
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
Ridgewood Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
East Moline, IL
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
3,558
|
|
|
|
4,256
|
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
River Village
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Flint, MI
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
13,877
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
15,361
|
|
|
|
17,117
|
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
7,049
|
|
|
|
7,370
|
|
Rivers Edge
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Greenville, MI
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
(1,643
|
)
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Riverwoods
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Kankakee, IL
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
8,378
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
5,077
|
|
Rosedale Court Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Dawson Springs, KY
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
Round Barn
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Champaign, IL
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
5,134
|
|
|
|
5,729
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
10,876
|
|
|
|
11,810
|
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
9,498
|
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
Rutherford Park
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Hummelstown, PA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
5,126
|
|
|
|
5,502
|
|
|
|
(3,005
|
)
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
San Jose Apartments
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-05
|
|
San Antonio, TX
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
17,313
|
|
|
|
17,547
|
|
|
|
(3,275
|
)
|
|
|
14,272
|
|
|
|
5,271
|
|
San Juan Del Centro
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Sep-05
|
|
Boulder, CO
|
|
|
1971
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
7,110
|
|
|
|
12,551
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
19,466
|
|
|
|
19,904
|
|
|
|
(3,729
|
)
|
|
|
16,175
|
|
|
|
11,652
|
|
Sandy Hill Terrace
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Norristown, PA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
6,599
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
9,382
|
|
|
|
11,032
|
|
|
|
(3,011
|
)
|
|
|
8,021
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
Sandy Springs
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
Macon, GA
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
(1,703
|
)
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
School Street
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Taunton, MA
|
|
|
1920
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
4,980
|
|
|
|
5,199
|
|
|
|
(2,742
|
)
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
Sherman Hills
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Wilkes-Barre, PA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
15,549
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
16,883
|
|
|
|
18,922
|
|
|
|
(13,422
|
)
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
Shoreview
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
19,071
|
|
|
|
18,283
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
37,376
|
|
|
|
38,852
|
|
|
|
(13,248
|
)
|
|
|
25,604
|
|
|
|
17,278
|
|
South Bay Villa
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
6,435
|
|
|
|
7,787
|
|
|
|
(3,290
|
)
|
|
|
4,497
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
Springfield Villas
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Lockhart, TX
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
St. George Villas
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
St. George, SC
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Sterling Village
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
San Bernadino, CA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
6,730
|
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
4,497
|
|
Stonegate Apts
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jul-09
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1920
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
3,610
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
Sumler Terrace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Norfolk, VA
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
5,118
|
|
|
|
(3,643
|
)
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
Summit Oaks
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Burke, VA
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
4,930
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
|
4,497
|
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
Suntree
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
St. Johns, MI
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
6,488
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
7,549
|
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
966
|
|
Tabor Towers
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Lewisburg, WV
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
3,596
|
|
|
|
3,759
|
|
|
|
(2,136
|
)
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
Tamarac Apartments I
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-04
|
|
Woodlands, TX
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
(2,071
|
)
|
|
|
4,457
|
|
|
|
4,188
|
|
Tamarac Apartments II
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-04
|
|
Woodlands, TX
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
4,048
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
7,119
|
|
|
|
7,385
|
|
|
|
(2,349
|
)
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
Terraces
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Kettering, OH
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
Terry Manor
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Oct-05
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
5,848
|
|
|
|
6,648
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
12,274
|
|
|
|
14,271
|
|
|
|
(4,379
|
)
|
|
|
9,892
|
|
|
|
6,961
|
|
Tompkins Terrace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Beacon, NY
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
18,955
|
|
|
|
19,827
|
|
|
|
(3,124
|
)
|
|
|
16,703
|
|
|
|
8,536
|
|
Trestletree Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
7,305
|
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
5,186
|
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
University Square
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
12,201
|
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
24,410
|
|
|
|
25,112
|
|
|
|
(8,361
|
)
|
|
|
16,751
|
|
|
|
13,634
|
|
Van Nuys Apartments
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
4,253
|
|
|
|
21,226
|
|
|
|
19,594
|
|
|
|
4,219
|
|
|
|
40,854
|
|
|
|
45,073
|
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
39,492
|
|
|
|
20,870
|
|
Victory Square
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Canton, OH
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Village Oaks
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Catonsville, MD
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
5,188
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
6,963
|
|
|
|
9,090
|
|
|
|
(4,748
|
)
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
4,479
|
|
I-84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Village of Kaufman
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-05
|
|
Kaufman, TX
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
Vintage Crossing
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Cuthbert, GA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
Vista Park Chino
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Chino, CA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
1,909
|
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
Vistula Heritage Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-08
|
|
Toledo, OH
|
|
|
1930
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
20,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
20,635
|
|
|
|
21,947
|
|
|
|
(8,119
|
)
|
|
|
13,828
|
|
|
|
12,716
|
|
Wah Luck House
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Washington, DC
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,690
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,166
|
|
|
|
9,166
|
|
|
|
(2,407
|
)
|
|
|
6,759
|
|
|
|
9,147
|
|
Walnut Hills
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
|
|
11,610
|
|
|
|
(1,788
|
)
|
|
|
9,822
|
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
Wasco Arms
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Wasco, CA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
(1,368
|
)
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
Washington Square West
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Sep-04
|
|
Philadelphia, PA
|
|
|
1982
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
11,169
|
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
16,996
|
|
|
|
17,578
|
|
|
|
(7,665
|
)
|
|
|
9,913
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
Westwood Terrace
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Moline, IL
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
4,548
|
|
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
3,311
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
White Cliff
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Lincoln Heights, OH
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Whitefield Place
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
San Antonio, TX
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
|
|
(2,054
|
)
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
Wickford
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
Henderson, NC
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
Wilderness Trail
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Pineville, KY
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
4,048
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
5,732
|
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
4,509
|
|
|
|
4,478
|
|
Wilkes Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
North Wilkesboro, NC
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
Willow Wood
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
North Hollywood, CA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Winnsboro Arms
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Winnsboro, SC
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
(1,508
|
)
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Winter Gardens
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Mar-04
|
|
St Louis, MO
|
|
|
1920
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
3,072
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
7,520
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
|
6,486
|
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
Woodcrest
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Odessa, TX
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Woodland
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Spartanburg, SC
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodland Hills
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-05
|
|
Jackson, MI
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
3,875
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
8,361
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
(2,727
|
)
|
|
|
5,955
|
|
|
|
3,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affordable Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,845
|
|
|
|
119,679
|
|
|
|
881,432
|
|
|
|
442,857
|
|
|
|
118,882
|
|
|
|
1,325,086
|
|
|
|
1,443,968
|
|
|
|
(484,724
|
)
|
|
|
959,244
|
|
|
|
706,666
|
|
Other(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
2,107
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
(2,490
|
)
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,222
|
|
|
|
2,090,713
|
|
|
|
4,702,013
|
|
|
|
2,597,713
|
|
|
|
2,148,389
|
|
|
|
7,242,051
|
|
|
|
9,390,440
|
|
|
|
(2,594,544
|
)
|
|
|
6,795,896
|
|
|
|
5,398,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atriums of Plantation
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Aug-98
|
|
Plantation, FL
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
10,385
|
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
15,025
|
|
|
|
(5,151
|
)
|
|
|
9,874
|
|
|
|
5,780
|
|
Citrus Grove
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jun-98
|
|
Redlands, CA
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
8,828
|
|
|
|
9,946
|
|
|
|
(3,983
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
Defoors Crossing
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
(1,213
|
)
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairway
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-00
|
|
Plano, TX
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
|
10,925
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
(5,794
|
)
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
|
|
8,885
|
|
Glenbridge Manors
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-03
|
|
Cincinnati, OH
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
17,447
|
|
|
|
14,108
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
31,554
|
|
|
|
32,585
|
|
|
|
(7,012
|
)
|
|
|
25,573
|
|
|
|
16,820
|
|
Highland Ridge
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-04
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
6,174
|
|
|
|
5,145
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
(4,605
|
)
|
|
|
7,939
|
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
Homestead
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-05
|
|
East Lansing, MI
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
10,526
|
|
|
|
(3,878
|
)
|
|
|
6,648
|
|
|
|
3,372
|
|
Sandpiper Cove
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Boynton Beach, FL
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
|
|
21,396
|
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
|
|
28,537
|
|
|
|
32,048
|
|
|
|
(11,039
|
)
|
|
|
21,009
|
|
|
|
29,425
|
|
Sienna Bay
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-00
|
|
St. Petersburg, FL
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
9,778
|
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
20,480
|
|
|
|
22,217
|
|
|
|
(10,277
|
)
|
|
|
11,940
|
|
|
|
10,630
|
|
Solana Vista
|
|
Garden
|
|
Dec-97
|
|
Bradenton, FL
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
7,170
|
|
|
|
6,872
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
14,042
|
|
|
|
15,318
|
|
|
|
(5,449
|
)
|
|
|
9,869
|
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
Stoney Brook
|
|
Garden
|
|
Nov-96
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Summit Creek
|
|
Garden
|
|
May-98
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
6,037
|
|
|
|
2,591
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
8,628
|
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
|
(3,285
|
)
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
5,670
|
|
I-85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
SCHEDULE III: REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Type
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Location
|
|
Built
|
|
|
of Units
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(AD)
|
|
|
AD
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
(In thousands Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
Talbot Woods
|
|
Garden
|
|
Sep-04
|
|
Middleboro, MA
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
5,852
|
|
|
|
4,719
|
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
5,852
|
|
|
|
6,745
|
|
|
|
12,597
|
|
|
|
(2,150
|
)
|
|
|
10,447
|
|
|
|
6,203
|
|
Tar River Estates
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Greenville, NC
|
|
|
1969
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
14,298
|
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
18,038
|
|
|
|
19,596
|
|
|
|
(7,601
|
)
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Tierra Palms
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Norwalk, CA
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
6,441
|
|
|
|
6,807
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
6,441
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
13,857
|
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
|
|
13,002
|
|
|
|
10,777
|
|
Village Green
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Altamonte Springs, FL
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
9,132
|
|
|
|
9,740
|
|
|
|
(4,386
|
)
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
Wilson Acres
|
|
Garden
|
|
Apr-06
|
|
Greenville, NC
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
3,943
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
|
|
6,080
|
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
|
|
2,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Conventional Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
33,698
|
|
|
|
137,573
|
|
|
|
70,301
|
|
|
|
34,027
|
|
|
|
207,545
|
|
|
|
241,572
|
|
|
|
(78,759
|
)
|
|
|
162,813
|
|
|
|
129,800
|
|
Affordable Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baldwin Oaks
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Oct-99
|
|
Parsippany ,NJ
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
8,516
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
11,260
|
|
|
|
(6,245
|
)
|
|
|
5,015
|
|
|
|
12,972
|
|
Baldwin Towers
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
5,256
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
5,856
|
|
|
|
(4,002
|
)
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
Bloomsburg Towers
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Bloomsburg, PA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4,479
|
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
(2,761
|
)
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
Campbell Heights
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Oct-02
|
|
Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
6,719
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
8,328
|
|
|
|
(3,062
|
)
|
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
|
15,449
|
|
Cherry Ridge Terrace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Mar-02
|
|
Northern Cambria, PA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
1,916
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
Hillside Village
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Catawissa, PA
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
Hilltop
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Duquesne, PA
|
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
6,916
|
|
|
|
8,187
|
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
Hudson Terrace
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Hudson, NY
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
5,025
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
|
|
(3,813
|
)
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
Lodge Run
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Portage, PA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
Morrisania II
|
|
High Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Bronx, NY
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
15,783
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
17,493
|
|
|
|
18,152
|
|
|
|
(10,840
|
)
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
8,144
|
|
New Vistas I
|
|
Garden
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
1925
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
6,121
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
6,501
|
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
|
(5,577
|
)
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Oxford Terrace IV
|
|
Town Home
|
|
Oct-07
|
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Spring Manor
|
|
Mid Rise
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Holidaysburg, PA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Stonegate Village
|
|
Garden
|
|
Oct-00
|
|
New Castle, IN
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
3,242
|
|
|
|
3,550
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affrodable Properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
68,474
|
|
|
|
10,649
|
|
|
|
7,760
|
|
|
|
79,128
|
|
|
|
86,888
|
|
|
|
(49,973
|
)
|
|
|
36,915
|
|
|
|
48,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,980
|
|
|
|
41,463
|
|
|
|
206,047
|
|
|
|
81,028
|
|
|
|
41,788
|
|
|
|
286,750
|
|
|
|
328,538
|
|
|
|
(128,795
|
)
|
|
|
199,743
|
|
|
|
178,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Continuing and Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,202
|
|
|
|
2,132,176
|
|
|
|
4,908,060
|
|
|
|
2,678,741
|
|
|
|
2,190,177
|
|
|
|
7,528,801
|
|
|
|
9,718,978
|
|
|
|
(2,723,339
|
)
|
|
|
6,995,639
|
|
|
|
5,576,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Date we acquired the property or first consolidated the
partnership which owns the property. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Initial cost includes the tendering costs to acquire the
noncontrolling interest share of our consolidated real estate
partnerships. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Costs capitalized subsequent to consolidation includes costs
capitalized since acquisition or first consolidation of the
partnership/property. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Other includes land parcels, commercial properties and other
related costs. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The aggregate cost of land and depreciable property for federal
income tax purposes was approximately $8.0 billion at
December 31, 2009. |
I-86
AIMCO
PROPERTIES, L.P.
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,000,496
|
|
|
$
|
12,420,200
|
|
|
$
|
12,011,693
|
|
Additions during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newly consolidated assets and acquisition of limited partnership
interests(1)
|
|
|
19,683
|
|
|
|
31,447
|
|
|
|
31,572
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,445
|
|
|
|
233,059
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
275,444
|
|
|
|
665,233
|
|
|
|
689,719
|
|
Deductions during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty and other write-offs(2)
|
|
|
(43,134
|
)
|
|
|
(130,595
|
)
|
|
|
(24,594
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
(1,533,511
|
)
|
|
|
(2,093,234
|
)
|
|
|
(521,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
9,718,978
|
|
|
$
|
11,000,496
|
|
|
$
|
12,420,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,814,992
|
|
|
$
|
3,047,211
|
|
|
$
|
2,900,909
|
|
Additions during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
478,550
|
|
|
|
497,395
|
|
|
|
477,725
|
|
Newly consolidated assets and acquisition of limited partnership
interests(1)
|
|
|
(2,763
|
)
|
|
|
(22,256
|
)
|
|
|
(128,272
|
)
|
Deductions during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casualty and other write-offs
|
|
|
(5,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1,838
|
)
|
|
|
(5,280
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
(562,240
|
)
|
|
|
(705,520
|
)
|
|
|
(197,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,723,339
|
|
|
$
|
2,814,992
|
|
|
$
|
3,047,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the effect of newly consolidated assets, acquisition of
limited partnership interests and related activity. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Casualty and other write-offs in 2008 include impairments
totaling $91.1 million related to our Lincoln Place and
Pacific Bay Vistas properties. |
I-87
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Aimcos charter limits the liability of Aimcos
directors and officers to Aimco and its stockholders to the
fullest extent permitted from time to time by Maryland law.
Maryland law presently permits the liability of directors and
officers to a corporation or its stockholders for money damages
to be limited, except (i) to the extent that it is proved
that the director or officer actually received an improper
benefit or profit in money, property or services for the amount
of the benefit or profit in money, property or services actually
received, or (ii) to the extent that a judgment or other
final adjudication adverse to the director or officer is entered
in a proceeding based on a finding that the directors or
officers action, or failure to act, was the result of
active and deliberate dishonesty and was material to the cause
of action adjudicated in the proceeding. This provision does not
limit the ability of Aimco or its stockholders to obtain other
relief, such as an injunction or rescission.
Aimcos charter and bylaws require Aimco to indemnify its
directors and officers and permits Aimco to indemnify certain
other parties to the fullest extent permitted from time to time
by Maryland law. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify
its directors, officers and certain other parties against
judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses
actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to
which they may be made a party by reason of their service to or
at the request of the corporation, unless it is established that
(i) the act or omission of the indemnified party was
material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was
committed in bad faith or was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty, (ii) the indemnified party actually
received an improper personal benefit in money, property or
services or (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding,
the indemnified party had reasonable cause to believe that the
act or omission was unlawful. Indemnification may be made
against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable
expenses actually incurred by the director or officer in
connection with the proceeding; provided, however, that if the
proceeding is one by or in the right of the corporation,
indemnification may not be made with respect to any proceeding
in which the director or officer has been adjudged to be liable
to the corporation. In addition, a director or officer may not
be indemnified with respect to any proceeding charging improper
personal benefit to the director or officer, whether or not
involving action in the directors or officers
official capacity, in which the director or officer was adjudged
to be liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly
received. The termination of any proceeding by conviction, or
upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, or an entry of
any order of probation prior to judgment, creates a rebuttable
presumption that the director or officer did not meet the
requisite standard of conduct required for indemnification to be
permitted. It is the position of the SEC that indemnification of
directors and officers for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act is against public policy and is unenforceable
pursuant to Section 14 of the Securities Act.
Aimco has entered into agreements with certain of its officers,
pursuant to which Aimco has agreed to indemnify such officers to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
Section 10.6 of Apartment Investment and Management Company
2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or the 2007 Plan,
specifically provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, each of the members of the Board of Directors of Aimco, the
Compensation Committee of the board of directors and each of the
directors, officers and employees of Aimco, any Aimco
subsidiary, Aimco OP and any subsidiary of the Aimco OP shall be
held harmless and indemnified by Aimco for any liability, loss
(including amounts paid in settlement), damages or expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees) suffered by virtue
of any determinations, acts or failures to act, or alleged acts
or failures to act, in connection with the administration of the
2007 Plan, so long as such person is not determined by a final
adjudication to be guilty of willful misconduct with respect to
such determination, action or failure to act.
The Aimco OP partnership agreement requires Aimco OP to
indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent
authorized by applicable law against any and all losses, claims,
damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses (including,
without limitation, attorneys fees and other legal fees
and expenses), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts
arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or
proceedings, civil, criminal, administrative or investigative,
that relate to the operations of Aimco OP. Such indemnification
continues after the director or officer ceases to be a director
or officer. The right to indemnification includes the right to
be paid by Aimco OP the expenses incurred in defending any
proceeding in advance of its final disposition upon the delivery
of an undertaking by or on behalf of the indemnitee to repay all
amounts advanced if a final judicial decision is rendered that
such indemnitee did not meet the standard of conduct permitting
indemnification under the Aimco OP partnership agreement or
applicable law.
Aimco OP maintains insurance, at its expense, to protect against
any liability or loss, regardless of whether any director or
officer is entitled to indemnification under the Aimco OP
partnership agreement or applicable law.
II-1
Directors and officers of the Corporate General Partner are also
officers of Aimco, and as such, are entitled to indemnification
as described above with respect to the directors and officers of
Aimco.
(a) Exhibits. An index to exhibits
appears below and is incorporated herein by reference. The
agreements included as exhibits to this registration statement
contain representations and warranties by the parties constitute
disclosure under the federal securities laws. However, some of
the agreements have been made for the benefit of other parties
thereto and:
|
|
|
|
|
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements
of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of
the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
|
|
|
|
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other
party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable
agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in
the agreement;
|
|
|
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different
from what may be viewed as material to you or other
investors; and
|
|
|
|
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or
such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement
and are subject to more recent developments.
|
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not
describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were
made or at any other time. Aimco and Aimco OP acknowledge that,
notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary
statements, they are responsible for considering whether
additional specific disclosures of material information
regarding material contractual provisions are required to make
the statements in this registration statement not misleading.
Additional information about Aimco and Aimco OP may be found
elsewhere in this registration statement and Aimcos and
Aimco OPs other public filings, which are available
without charge through the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
See Where You Can Find Additional Information in the
information statement/prospectus that forms a part of this
registration statement.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules. None
required.
(c) Reports, Opinions or
Appraisals. Appraisal report by Cogent Realty
Advisors, LLC related to Twin Lakes Apartments is filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement filed with the SEC.
(a) Each of the undersigned registrants hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by
section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the
aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more
than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set
forth in the Calculation of Registration Fee table
in the effective registration statement;
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement;
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under
the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, the undersigned
registrant undertakes that each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) as part of a registration
II-2
statement relating to an offering, other than registration
statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses
filed in reliance on Rule 430A (§ 230.430A of
this chapter), shall be deemed to be part of and included in the
registration statement as of the date it is first used after
effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement or made in a document incorporated or
deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will,
as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such
first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in
the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the
registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to such date of first use.
(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the
initial distribution of the securities:
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering
of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this
registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method
used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities
are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the
following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a
seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell
such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(6) That for purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the Registrants
annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and,
where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plans
annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act) that is incorporated by reference in the registration
statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(7) That prior to any public reoffering of the securities
registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part
of this registration statement, by any person or party who is
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.
(8) That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant
to paragraph (7) immediately preceding, or (ii) that
purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of
the Securities Act and is used in connection with an offering of
securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of
an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(9) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to
directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
II-3
(10) To respond to requests for information that is
incorporated by reference into the information
statement/prospectus pursuant to Item 4, 10(b), 11, or 13
of this form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class
mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information
contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of
the registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(11) To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all
information concerning a transaction, and the company being
acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and
included in the registration statement when it became effective.
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Denver, State of Colorado,
November 19, 2010.
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND
MANAGEMENT COMPANY
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
|
Name: Ernest M. Freedman
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Terry
Considine
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer)
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
Ernest
M. Freedman
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer)
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Paul
Beldin
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
accounting officer)
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
James
N. Bailey
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
S. Ellwood
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
L. Keltner
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
J.
Landis Martin
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Robert
A. Miller
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Michael
A. Stein
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Kathleen
M. Nelson
|
|
Director
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By: /s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
Ernest
M. Freedman
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Denver, State of Colorado,
November 19, 2010.
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
AIMCO-GP, Inc., its General Partner
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
|
Name: Ernest M. Freedman
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Terry
Considine
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
registrants general partner (principal executive officer)
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Miles
Cortez
|
|
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative
Officer of the registrants general partner
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
Ernest
M. Freedman
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
registrants general partner (principal financial officer)
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Paul
Beldin
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the
registrants general partner (principal accounting officer)
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ ERNEST
M. FREEDMAN
|
|
|
|
November 19, 2010
|
|
|
Ernest
M. Freedman
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-6
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 8, 2010
by and among U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, AIMCO
USRP Merger Sub LLC and Aimco Properties, L.P. (Annex A to
the Information Statement/Prospectus filed hereto)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Charter of Apartment Investment and Management Company
(Exhibit 3.1 to Aimcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Apartment Investment and
Management Company (Exhibit 3.2 to Aimcos Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 4, 2010, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of July 29, 1994, as
amended and restated as of February 28, 2007
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, is incorporated
herein by this reference)
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of
December 31, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Second Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of
July 30, 2009 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Third Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of AIMCO Properties, L.P., dated as of
December 31, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 3, 2010, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
regarding the validity of the Common OP Units being
registered.
|
|
5
|
.2
|
|
Opinion of DLA Piper regarding the validity of the Class A
Common Stock issuable upon redemption of the Common OP
Units
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
regarding certain tax matters
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
November 2, 2004, by and among Aimco, AIMCO Properties,
L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP Management Company
as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National
Association, and the Lenders listed therein (Exhibit 4.1 to
Aimcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Secured Credit
Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2005, by and among Aimco,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., and NHP
Management Company as the borrowers and Bank of America, N.A.,
Keybank National Association, and the Lenders listed therein
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2006, by and among Aimco,
AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as
the borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National
Association, and the lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated March 22, 2006, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Third Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
August 31, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated August 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 14, 2007, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 14, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 9, 2008, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 11, 2008, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 1, 2009, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent
and Bank of America, N.A., Keybank National Association and the
other lenders listed therein (Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as
of August 4, 2009, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein and the lenders party thereto (Exhibit 10.1
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated August 6, 2009, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Eighth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
February 3, 2010, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein and the lenders party thereto (Exhibit 10.1
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated February 5, 2010, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit
Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2010, by and among Apartment
Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and
AIMCO/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., as the borrowers, the guarantors
and the pledgors named therein and the lenders party thereto
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, is
incorporated herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Senior Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 29, 2010, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., and AIMCO/Bethesda
Holdings, Inc., as the Borrowers, the pledgors and guarantors
named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
swing line lender and L/C issuer, and the lenders party thereto
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated September 29, 2010, is incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Master Indemnification Agreement, dated December 3, 2001,
by and among Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO
Properties, L.P., XYZ Holdings LLC, and the other parties
signatory thereto (Exhibit 2.3 to Aimcos Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Tax Indemnification and Contest Agreement, dated
December 3, 2001, by and among Apartment Investment and
Management Company, National Partnership Investments, Corp., and
XYZ Holdings LLC and the other parties signatory thereto
(Exhibit 2.4 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 6, 2001, is incorporated herein by this
reference)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of AIMCO JV Portfolio #1,
LLC dated as of December 30, 2003 by and among AIMCO
BRE I, LLC, AIMCO BRE II, LLC and SRV-AJVP#1, LLC
(Exhibit 10.54 to Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated
herein by this reference)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Employment Contract executed on December 29, 2008, by and
between AIMCO Properties, L.P. and Terry Considine
(Exhibit 10.1 to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 29, 2008, is incorporated herein by this
reference)*
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Apartment Investment and Management Company 1997 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan (October 1999) (Exhibit 10.26 to
Aimcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, is incorporated
herein by this reference)*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (1997 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.11 to Aimcos Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, is
incorporated herein by this reference)*
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (1997 Stock Award and
Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.42 to Aimcos Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, is incorporated
herein by this reference)*
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
2007 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Appendix A to Aimcos Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 20, 2007)*
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to
Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)*
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.3
to Aimcos Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated April 30, 2007, is incorporated herein by this
reference)*
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Appendix B to Aimcos Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 20, 2007)*
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (Exhibit 21.1 to Aimcos Annual
Report of
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated herein
by this reference)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
(included in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of DLA Piper (included in Exhibit 5.2)
|
|
23
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
(included in Exhibit 8.1)
|
|
23
|
.7
|
|
Consent of Cogent Realty Advisors, LLC
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Appraisal Report, dated as of May 21, 2010, by Cogent
Realty Advisors, LLC, related to Twin Lakes Apartments.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Schedules and supplemental materials to the exhibits have been
omitted but will be provided to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request. |
|
(2) |
|
The file reference number for all exhibits is
001-13232,
and all such exhibits remain available pursuant to the Records
Control Schedule of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
|
|
Previously filed with the Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
File
No. 333-169870,
filed by Aimco and Aimco OP on October 12, 2010. |