Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
Commission File Number: 001-13425
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
9500 Glenlyon Parkway
Burnaby, BC, Canada
V5J 0C6
(778) 331 5500
(Address of principal executive offices)
indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F
Form 20-F o Form 40-F þ
indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
indicate by check mark whether by furnishing information contained in this Form,
the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to
Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Yes o
No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all information and
footnotes required by Canadian or United States generally accepted accounting principles for a
complete set of annual financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all
adjustments (which consist only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation
of the results of operations for the relevant periods have been made. Results for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year or any other
period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the summary of accounting
policies and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, a copy of which has been filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These policies have been applied on a consistent
basis.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Retained Earnings
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
82,229 |
|
|
$ |
75,934 |
|
|
$ |
269,073 |
|
|
$ |
280,068 |
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
9,680 |
|
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
34,833 |
|
|
|
35,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,549 |
|
|
|
65,419 |
|
|
|
234,240 |
|
|
|
244,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (note 3) |
|
|
11,277 |
|
|
|
7,823 |
|
|
|
26,824 |
|
|
|
22,419 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
43,228 |
|
|
|
42,106 |
|
|
|
134,219 |
|
|
|
123,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,505 |
|
|
|
49,929 |
|
|
|
161,043 |
|
|
|
145,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
18,044 |
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
|
73,197 |
|
|
|
98,860 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(3,696 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
(737 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Other |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
15,366 |
|
|
|
73,245 |
|
|
|
100,861 |
|
Income tax expense (recovery): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
4,207 |
|
|
|
19,315 |
|
|
|
28,430 |
|
Future |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
20,849 |
|
|
|
29,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share (note 7 (d)): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, beginning of period |
|
$ |
429,151 |
|
|
$ |
397,665 |
|
|
$ |
411,326 |
|
|
$ |
357,845 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
12,892 |
|
|
|
52,396 |
|
|
|
71,618 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(11,085 |
) |
|
|
(10,529 |
) |
|
|
(32,178 |
) |
|
|
(29,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, end of period |
|
$ |
431,544 |
|
|
$ |
400,028 |
|
|
$ |
431,544 |
|
|
$ |
400,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
191,394 |
|
|
$ |
122,596 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
175,998 |
|
|
|
52,228 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
21,257 |
|
|
|
6,640 |
|
Advances against auction contracts |
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
9,173 |
|
|
|
3,824 |
|
Future income tax asset |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,109 |
|
|
|
198,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital assets (note 3) |
|
|
619,604 |
|
|
|
597,945 |
|
Other assets (note 4) |
|
|
11,770 |
|
|
|
14,472 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
45,862 |
|
|
|
45,593 |
|
Future income tax asset |
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,092,148 |
|
|
$ |
857,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction proceeds payable |
|
$ |
257,224 |
|
|
$ |
74,726 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
80,374 |
|
|
|
88,402 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt (note 5) |
|
|
29,269 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369,506 |
|
|
|
168,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
133,102 |
|
|
|
130,394 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
Future income tax liability |
|
|
16,069 |
|
|
|
13,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520,554 |
|
|
|
313,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 7) |
|
|
103,008 |
|
|
|
99,980 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
18,028 |
|
|
|
16,146 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
431,544 |
|
|
|
411,326 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
19,014 |
|
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571,594 |
|
|
|
544,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,092,148 |
|
|
$ |
857,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 8)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
99,980 |
|
|
$ |
16,146 |
|
|
$ |
411,326 |
|
|
$ |
16,959 |
|
|
$ |
544,411 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Stock compensation
tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,029 |
) |
|
|
(4,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
101,212 |
|
|
|
16,521 |
|
|
|
413,586 |
|
|
|
12,930 |
|
|
|
544,249 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Stock compensation
tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,553 |
) |
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,958 |
) |
|
|
(15,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
|
|
102,528 |
|
|
|
17,093 |
|
|
|
429,151 |
|
|
|
(3,028 |
) |
|
|
545,744 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417 |
|
Stock compensation
tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,478 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,085 |
) |
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,042 |
|
|
|
22,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
103,008 |
|
|
$ |
18,028 |
|
|
$ |
431,544 |
|
|
$ |
19,014 |
|
|
$ |
571,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
22,042 |
|
|
|
15,530 |
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
20,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
35,520 |
|
|
$ |
28,422 |
|
|
$ |
54,451 |
|
|
$ |
92,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
Items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,277 |
|
|
|
7,823 |
|
|
|
26,824 |
|
|
|
22,419 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
737 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(1,091 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
Changes in non-cash working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(89,355 |
) |
|
|
(29,133 |
) |
|
|
(123,571 |
) |
|
|
(80,599 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(10,754 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(14,182 |
) |
|
|
3,602 |
|
Advances against auction contracts |
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
(2,480 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
(5,282 |
) |
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auction proceeds payable |
|
|
72,823 |
|
|
|
28,648 |
|
|
|
178,757 |
|
|
|
191,274 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
12,794 |
|
|
|
17,733 |
|
|
|
(7,878 |
) |
|
|
28,403 |
|
Other |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
15,620 |
|
|
|
31,327 |
|
|
|
110,352 |
|
|
|
235,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital asset additions |
|
|
(10,284 |
) |
|
|
(38,132 |
) |
|
|
(46,185 |
) |
|
|
(117,335 |
) |
Proceeds on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
(5,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
(8,745 |
) |
|
|
(37,456 |
) |
|
|
(39,463 |
) |
|
|
(120,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of share capital |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
Dividends on common shares |
|
|
(11,085 |
) |
|
|
(10,529 |
) |
|
|
(32,178 |
) |
|
|
(29,435 |
) |
Issuance of short-term debt |
|
|
28,912 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
30,765 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
Repayment of short-term debt |
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,707 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
66,408 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(14,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,436 |
) |
|
|
(14,999 |
) |
Other |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
17,218 |
|
|
|
(8,503 |
) |
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
|
|
27,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign currency rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,620 |
|
|
|
9,565 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
17,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
33,713 |
|
|
|
(5,067 |
) |
|
|
68,798 |
|
|
|
159,795 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
157,681 |
|
|
|
272,137 |
|
|
|
122,596 |
|
|
|
107,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
191,394 |
|
|
$ |
267,070 |
|
|
$ |
191,394 |
|
|
$ |
267,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
5,642 |
|
|
$ |
3,849 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
3,685 |
|
|
$ |
5,579 |
|
|
$ |
19,152 |
|
|
$ |
29,027 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 6 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
1. |
|
Significant accounting policies: |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of presentation: |
|
|
|
|
These unaudited consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results
of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows of
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (the Company) and its subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
|
|
|
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to interim financial
information and are based on accounting principles and practices consistent with those used
in the preparation of the annual consolidated financial statements. These consolidated
financial statements are not materially different from those that would be presented in
accordance with United States GAAP, except as disclosed in note 10. The interim
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2009
audited consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Revenue recognition: |
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues are comprised mostly of auction commissions, which are earned by the
Company acting as an agent for consignors of equipment and other assets, but also include
net profits on the sale of inventory, internet and proxy purchase fees, administrative and
documentation fees on the sale of certain lots, and auction advertising fees. All revenue
is recognized when the auction sale is complete and the Company has determined that the
auction proceeds are collectible. |
|
|
|
|
Auction commissions represent the percentage earned by the Company on the gross proceeds
from equipment and other assets sold at auction. The majority of auction commissions is
earned as a pre-negotiated fixed rate of the gross selling price. Other commissions are
earned when the Company guarantees a certain level of proceeds to a consignor. This type
of commission typically includes a pre-negotiated percentage of the guaranteed gross
proceeds plus a percentage of proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. If actual
auction proceeds are less than the guaranteed amount, commission is reduced; if proceeds
are sufficiently lower, the Company can incur a loss on the sale. Losses, if any,
resulting from guarantee contracts are recorded in the period in which the relevant auction
is completed. If a loss relating to a guarantee contract to be sold after a period end is
known at the financial statement reporting date, the loss is accrued in the financial
statements for that period. The Companys exposure from these guarantee contracts
fluctuates over time (see note 8). |
- 7 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
1. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Revenue recognition (continued): |
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues also include net profit on the sale of inventory items. In some cases,
incidental to its regular commission business, the Company temporarily acquires title to
items for a short time prior to a particular auction sale. The auction revenue recorded is
the net gain or loss on the sale of the items. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Comparative figures: |
|
|
|
|
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current period. |
2. |
|
Seasonality of operations: |
The Companys operations are both seasonal and event driven. Auction revenues tend to be
highest during the second and fourth calendar quarters. The Company generally conducts more
auctions during these quarters than during the first and third calendar quarters. Mid-December
through mid-February and July through August are traditionally less active periods.
In addition, the Companys revenue is dependent upon the timing of such events as fleet
upgrades and realignments, contractor retirements, and the completion of major projects, among
other things. These events are not predictable and are usually unrelated to fiscal quarters,
making quarter-to-quarter comparability difficult.
- 8 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net book |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Cost |
|
|
depreciation |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
344,482 |
|
|
$ |
22,562 |
|
|
$ |
321,920 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
254,974 |
|
|
|
46,410 |
|
|
|
208,564 |
|
Land and buildings under development |
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
Yard equipment |
|
|
32,657 |
|
|
|
15,992 |
|
|
|
16,665 |
|
Computer software and equipment under
development |
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
40,895 |
|
|
|
22,433 |
|
|
|
18,462 |
|
Automotive equipment |
|
|
20,588 |
|
|
|
9,239 |
|
|
|
11,349 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
20,409 |
|
|
|
8,529 |
|
|
|
11,880 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
19,258 |
|
|
|
10,462 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
Leasehold improvements under development |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
14,437 |
|
|
|
3,324 |
|
|
|
11,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
758,555 |
|
|
$ |
138,951 |
|
|
$ |
619,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net book |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Cost |
|
|
depreciation |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
294,134 |
|
|
$ |
19,684 |
|
|
$ |
274,450 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
232,160 |
|
|
|
40,882 |
|
|
|
191,278 |
|
Land and buildings under development |
|
|
57,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,057 |
|
Yard equipment |
|
|
28,945 |
|
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
15,412 |
|
Computer software and equipment under
development |
|
|
14,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,084 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
29,477 |
|
|
|
15,749 |
|
|
|
13,728 |
|
Automotive equipment |
|
|
20,124 |
|
|
|
8,223 |
|
|
|
11,901 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
17,275 |
|
|
|
6,998 |
|
|
|
10,277 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
14,707 |
|
|
|
7,104 |
|
|
|
7,603 |
|
Leasehold improvements under development |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
712,669 |
|
|
$ |
114,724 |
|
|
$ |
597,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company determined that certain assets on
which depreciation was charged had an indefinite life and therefore should not have been
depreciated. The accumulated depreciation on these assets was $2,668,000, which was reversed in
the period as an immaterial adjustment, resulting in a $2,668,000 decrease to depreciation
expense.
- 9 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
3. |
|
Capital assets (continued): |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company capitalized interest of $1,767,000
(2009 $3,515,000) to the cost of land, buildings, software, equipment, and leasehold
improvements under development.
4. |
|
Other non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable |
|
$ |
5,053 |
|
|
$ |
5,131 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
Long-term prepaids |
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
2,946 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,770 |
|
|
$ |
14,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The note receivable is secured by a property the Company is leasing and a neighbouring
property. The note is repayable in monthly installments of principal plus interest, with final
payment due in 2014.
Short-term debt at September 30, 2010 consisted of draws on the Companys revolving credit
facilities with a weighted average interest rate of 0.99% per annum.
- 10 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, unsecured,
bearing interest at 6.385%, due in quarterly
installments of interest only, with full amount of the
principal due in 2016. |
|
$ |
58,151 |
|
|
$ |
56,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, unsecured, bearing interest at 5.61%, due
in quarterly installments of interest only, with full
amount of the principal due in 2011, which the Company
intends to refinance on a long-term basis by drawing
on its available credit facilities. |
|
|
29,990 |
|
|
|
29,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, unsecured,
bearing interest at Canadian bankers acceptance rate
plus a margin between 0.65% and 1.00%, due in monthly
installments of interest only. The revolving credit
facility is available until January 2014. |
|
|
29,961 |
|
|
|
29,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, denominated in United States dollars,
unsecured, bearing interest at 2.30%, due in quarterly
installments of interest only, with the full amount of
the principal due in 2013, drawn to refinance the
Canadian dollar term loan that fell due in 2010. |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, secured by
a general security agreement, bearing interest at
4.429%, due in monthly installments of interest only,
with the full amount of the principal due in 2010,
which the Company refinanced on a long-term basis by
borrowing term debt under its committed, revolving
credit facility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
133,102 |
|
|
$ |
130,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
6. |
|
Long-term debt (continued): |
The following credit facilities are available to the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed revolving credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused |
|
$ |
124,424 |
|
|
$ |
180,513 |
|
Expires January 2014 |
|
|
119,424 |
|
|
|
165,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused |
|
$ |
284,688 |
|
|
$ |
280,426 |
|
Expires November 2011 |
|
|
191,680 |
|
|
|
192,928 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Shares issued: |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued and outstanding are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
105,378,620 |
|
Issued for cash, pursuant to stock options exercised |
|
|
210,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
105,588,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Stock option plan: |
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Under Option |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,922,587 |
|
|
$ |
15.13 |
|
Granted |
|
|
591,704 |
|
|
|
21.79 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
24.39 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(210,116 |
) |
|
|
11.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,301,175 |
|
|
$ |
16.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
2,308,577 |
|
|
$ |
15.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options outstanding at September 30, 2010 expire on dates ranging to September 8, 2020.
- 12 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
7. |
|
Share capital (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Stock option plan (continued): |
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30,
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining Life |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.89 $4.35 |
|
|
51,500 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.34 |
|
|
|
51,500 |
|
|
$ |
4.34 |
|
$5.18 |
|
|
172,124 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
172,124 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
$8.82 $10.80 |
|
|
339,700 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
9.82 |
|
|
|
339,700 |
|
|
|
9.82 |
|
$14.23 $14.70 |
|
|
1,320,184 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
14.55 |
|
|
|
933,843 |
|
|
|
14.57 |
|
$18.67 $19.23 |
|
|
383,104 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
18.68 |
|
|
|
376,200 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
|
$21.82 |
|
|
584,800 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
21.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$24.39 $25.76 |
|
|
449,763 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
24.41 |
|
|
|
435,210 |
|
|
|
24.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,301,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,308,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Stock-based compensation: |
|
|
|
|
The Company uses the fair value based method to account for employee stock-based
compensation awards. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company
recognized compensation cost of $2,086,000 (2009 $1,593,000) in respect of options
granted in 2010 and 2009 under its stock option plan. |
|
|
|
|
For the purposes described above, the fair value of the stock option grants was estimated
on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.84% |
|
|
|
2.47% |
|
Expected lives |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Volatility |
|
|
34.4% |
|
|
|
31.8% |
|
- 13 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
7. |
|
Share capital (continued): |
|
(c) |
|
Stock-based compensation (continued): |
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was $6.40 per option (2009 $3.77). The fair value method requires
that this amount be amortized over the relevant vesting periods of the underlying options. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
The computations for basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
|
105,485,763 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
|
105,492,613 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633,141 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
|
105,915,148 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
|
106,125,754 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
|
|
105,228,846 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
|
|
105,064,864 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
954,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
|
|
106,183,300 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
|
|
105,681,072 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, stock options to purchase 1,034,563
common shares (2009 452,763) were outstanding but were excluded from the calculation of
diluted earnings per share as they were anti-dilutive.
- 14 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
8. |
|
Commitments and contingencies: |
The Company is subject to legal and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of its
business. The Company does not believe that the results of these claims will have a material
effect on its financial position or results of operations.
In the normal course of its business, the Company will in certain situations guarantee to a
consignor a minimum level of proceeds in connection with the sale at auction of that
consignors equipment. At September 30, 2010, outstanding guarantees under contract for
industrial equipment to be sold prior to the end of the fourth quarter of 2010 totaled
$39,043,000 (December 31, 2009 $13,553,000 to be sold prior to the end of the second quarter
of 2010). The Company also had guarantees under contract totaling $13,023,000 relating to
agricultural auctions to be held prior to the end of the second quarter of 2011 (December 31,
2009 $8,070,000 to be sold prior to the end of the third quarter of 2010). The outstanding
guarantee amounts are undiscounted and before estimated proceeds from sale at auction. No
liability has been recorded with respect to these guarantee contracts.
9. |
|
Financial instruments: |
|
(a) |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
Carrying amounts of certain of the Companys financial instruments, including accounts
receivable, auction proceeds payable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and
short-term debt, approximate their fair values due to their short terms to maturity. Based
on lending rates currently available to the issuer of the note receivable for notes with
similar terms, the carrying amount of the Companys note receivable approximates its fair
value as at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The carrying amounts of the Companys
other non-current receivables approximate their fair values. Based on borrowing rates
currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, the fair value of its
long-term debt as at September 30, 2010 was approximately $138,122,000 (December 31, 2009
$138,429,000). |
|
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management |
|
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks by virtue of its activities,
including foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The
Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the oversight of the Companys risk
management. |
- 15 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
9. |
|
Financial instruments (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management (continued): |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange risk |
|
|
|
|
The Company operates internationally and is exposed to currency risk, primarily
relating to the Canadian and U.S. dollars, and the Euro, arising from sales, purchases and
loans that are denominated in currencies other than the respective functional currencies of
the Companys international operations. The Company also has various investments in
non-U.S. dollar self-sustaining operations. Upon translation of those operations net
assets into U.S. dollars, the Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk. The Company has
elected not to actively manage this exposure at this time. |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the currently quantifiable effect, with other
variables unchanged, of a 1% strengthening (weakening) of the U.S. dollar against the
Canadian dollar and Euro on the Companys financial statements is as follows: |
|
|
|
increase (decrease) net earnings by approximately $105,000 (2009 decrease
(increase) $100,000) due to the translation of the foreign operations statements of
operations into the Companys reporting currency, the U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
|
decrease (increase) net earnings by approximately $35,000 (2009 $115,000) due to
the revaluation of significant foreign currency denominated monetary items; and |
|
|
|
|
decrease (increase) other comprehensive income by approximately $2,900,000 (2009
$1,900,000). |
Interest rate risk
The Companys interest rate risk mainly arises from the interest rate impact on the
Companys cash and cash equivalents and floating rate debt. Cash and cash equivalents earn
interest based on market interest rates. As at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the Company was not exposed to significant interest rate risk on its cash and cash
equivalents.
The Companys interest rate management policy is generally to borrow at fixed rates.
However, floating rate funding has been used if the terms of borrowings are favorable. The
Company will consider utilizing derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps to
minimize its exposure to interest rate risk. As at September 30, 2010, approximately 23%
(December 31, 2009 22%) of the Companys borrowings are at floating rates of interest.
- 16 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
9. |
|
Financial instruments (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management (continued): |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk (continued) |
|
|
|
|
The weighted average interest rate paid by the Company on its outstanding floating rate
borrowings during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 1.29% (2009 2.43%). For
the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, with other variables unchanged, a
100 basis points or 1% increase (decrease) in interest rates would decrease (increase) net
earnings by approximately $105,000 (2009 $125,000). |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company arising from the
non-performance by counterparties of contractual financial obligations. The Company is not
exposed to significant credit risk on accounts receivable because it does not extend credit
to buyers at its auctions, and it has a large diversified customer base. In addition,
assets purchased at the Companys auctions are not normally released to the buyers until
the Company receives payment in full. The Companys maximum exposure to credit risk on
accounts receivable at the reporting date is the carrying value of its accounts receivable,
less those receivables relating to assets that have not been released to the buyers. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys credit risk exposure on liquid financial assets, being cash and cash
equivalents, is limited since it maintains its cash and cash equivalents in a range of
large financial institutions around the world. |
|
|
|
|
The Company limits its credit risk on its note receivable by performing credit verification
procedures prior to the issuance of the note receivable. In addition, the note receivable
is secured by a property the Company is leasing and a neighbouring property, and is
monitored on an ongoing basis. To date, the counterparty has not failed to meet its
financial obligations to the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial
obligations as they fall due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by maintaining
adequate cash and cash equivalent balances, generally by releasing payments to consignors
only after receivables from buyers have been collected. The Company also utilizes its
established lines of credit (notes 5 and 6) for short-term borrowings on an as-needed
basis. The Company continuously monitors and reviews both actual and forecast cash flows
to ensure there is sufficient working capital to satisfy its operating requirements. |
- 17 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at September 30, 2010 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited)
10. |
|
United States generally accepted accounting principles: |
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which
differ, in certain respects, from accounting practices generally accepted in the United States
and from requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company had a number of outstanding intercompany loan balances where settlement was not
planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future, which were considered part of net investments
in foreign operations. As such, foreign exchange gains or losses arising from these
intercompany loans are reported in the cumulative translation adjustment account under Canadian
GAAP. During the year ended December 31, 2008, foreign currency translation gains of
$14,884,000, net of tax of $139,000, were reclassified to net earnings. Under US GAAP, the
reclassification of the pro rata portion of foreign exchange gains or losses in accumulated
other comprehensive income to net earnings only occurs when the reduction in the net investment
is the result of a complete sale, or complete or substantially complete liquidation, which has
not occurred in this case.
As a result, the amounts in the consolidated balance sheets that differ from those reported
under Canadian GAAP are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
US GAAP |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
431,544 |
|
|
|
416,660 |
|
|
|
411,326 |
|
|
|
396,442 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
19,014 |
|
|
|
33,898 |
|
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
31,843 |
|
- 18 -
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The following discussion summarizes significant factors affecting the consolidated operating
results and financial condition of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (Ritchie Bros., the
Company, we or us) for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 compared to
the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009. This discussion should be read in
conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the
period ended September 30, 2010, and with the disclosures below regarding forward-looking
statements and risk factors. You should also consider our audited consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto and our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, which are included in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 40-F.
The date of this discussion is as of October 28, 2010. Additional information relating to our
company, including our Annual Information Form, is available by accessing the SEDAR website at
www.sedar.com. Our Annual Report on Form 40-F is available on the SECs EDGAR system at
www.sec.gov. None of the information on the SEDAR or EDGAR websites is incorporated by reference
into this document by this or any other reference.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in Canada, or Canadian GAAP. There are no material measurement differences between those
financial statements and the financial position and results of operations that would be reported
under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, except as
described in note 10 to the interim consolidated financial statements. Amounts discussed below are
based on our interim consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP
and are presented in U.S. dollars. Unless indicated otherwise, all tabular dollar amounts,
including related footnotes, presented below are expressed in thousands of dollars, except per
share amounts.
Ritchie Bros. is the worlds largest auctioneer of industrial equipment, selling more equipment to
on-site and online bidders than any other company in the world. Our world headquarters are located
in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and as of the date of this discussion, we operated from
over 110 locations in more than 25 countries, including 42 auction sites worldwide. We sell,
through unreserved public auctions, a broad range of used and unused industrial assets, including
equipment, trucks and other assets used in the construction, transportation, agricultural, material
handling, mining, forestry, petroleum and marine industries. Our purpose is to use unreserved
auctions to create a global marketplace for our customers to easily and confidently exchange their
equipment.
We operate mainly in the auction segment of the global industrial equipment marketplace. Our
primary target markets within that marketplace are the used truck and equipment sectors, which are
large and fragmented. The world market for used equipment and trucks is driven by the ongoing
production of new equipment and trucks and the motivation of equipment owners to realign their
fleets. Industry analysts estimate that the world-wide value of used equipment and truck
transactions, of the type of equipment we sell at our auctions, is greater than $100 billion per
year on average. Although we sell more used equipment than any other company in the world, we
estimate that our share of this fragmented market is in the range of 3-4%.
In recent periods, approximately 80% of the value of the items sold at our auctions was purchased
by end users of equipment and trucks (retail buyers), such as contractors, with the remainder being
purchased primarily by equipment and truck dealers, rental companies and brokers (wholesale
buyers). Consignors to our auctions represent a broad mix of equipment owners, the majority being
end users of equipment, with the balance being finance companies, truck and equipment dealers and
equipment rental companies, among others. Consignment volumes at our auctions are affected by a
number of factors, including regular fleet upgrades and reconfigurations, financial pressure,
retirements, and inventory reductions, as well as by the timing of the completion of major
construction and other projects.
- 19 -
We compete directly for potential purchasers of industrial assets with other auction companies. Our
indirect competitors include truck and equipment manufacturers, other third party methods, and
equipment rental companies that offer an alternative to purchasing. When sourcing equipment to sell
at our auctions, we compete with other auction companies, other third party methods, and equipment
owners that have traditionally disposed of equipment through private sales. Private sales between
equipment owners are the dominant form of transaction in the used truck and equipment sectors.
We have several key strengths that we believe provide distinct competitive advantages and will
enable us to grow and make our auctions more appealing to both buyers and sellers of industrial
assets. Some of our principal strengths include:
|
|
Our reputation for conducting only unreserved auctions and our widely recognized commitment
to honesty and fair dealing. |
|
|
Our ability to transcend local market conditions and create a global marketplace for
industrial assets by attracting diverse audiences of mainly end-user bidders from around the
world to our auctions. |
|
|
Our size, financial strength and access to capital, the international scope of our
operations, our extensive network of auction sites, and our marketing skills. |
|
|
Our ability to enhance our live auctions with technology such as our online bidding
service, our proprietary Virtual Ramp, our Timed Auction system, as well as our 21 language
website. |
|
|
Our in-depth experience in the marketplace, including our equipment valuation expertise and
proprietary customer and equipment databases. |
|
|
Our dedicated and experienced workforce, which allows us to, among other things, enter new
geographic markets, structure deals to meet our customers needs and provide high quality and
consistent service to consignors and bidders. |
Strict adherence to the unreserved auction process is one of our founding principles and, we
believe, one of our most significant competitive advantages. When we say unreserved we mean that
there are no minimum bids or reserve prices on anything sold at a Ritchie Bros. auction each item
sells to the highest bidder on sale day, regardless of the price. In addition, consignors (or their
agents) are not allowed to bid on, or buy back or in any way influence the selling price of their
own equipment. We maintain this commitment to the unreserved auction process because we believe
that an unreserved auction is an efficient and effective way to exchange equipment.
We attract a broad base of bidders from around the world to our auctions. Our worldwide marketing
efforts help to attract bidders, and they are willing to travel long distances or participate
online in part because of our reputation for conducting fair auctions. These diverse multinational,
mainly end user bidding audiences provide a global marketplace that allows our auctions to
transcend local market conditions, which we believe is a significant competitive advantage.
Evidence of this is the fact that in recent periods an average of approximately 60% of the value of
equipment sold at our auctions left the region of the sale.
We believe that our ability to consistently draw significant numbers of local and international
bidders from many different end markets to our auctions, most of whom are end users rather than
resellers, is appealing to sellers of used equipment and trucks, and helps us to attract
consignments to our auctions. Higher consignment volumes attract more bidders, which in turn
attract more consignments, and so on in a self-reinforcing process that has helped us to achieve
significant growth in our business.
- 20 -
In our 50 years of experience, past recessions have typically acted as a catalyst for equipment
owners to turn their surplus assets into cash quickly, efficiently and for fair market value, which
we believe has benefited our business. When cash flows and credit markets tighten and there is
uncertainty in the market, traditional buyers of new equipment have been more likely to look for
good quality, late-model used
equipment, resulting in enhanced demand for equipment at our auctions. However, the recent economic
environment is unlike prior recessions, particularly in the United States, and as a result it is
difficult to predict the timing of the various events that will cause an equipment owner to make
the decision to sell his equipment. There remains a significant amount of infrastructure and other
construction projects being undertaken around the world, which we believe benefits our business by
generating equipment buying and selling activity at our auctions.
We believe that as a result of
equipment market uncertainty and the recent economic environment, predominantly
in the U.S., financial institutions have been less likely to force equipment
owners to sell idle assets. This, combined with dramatically lower production
of new equipment over the last several years, has likely resulted in a decrease
in the volume of used equipment transactions in the marketplace over the past
two years. Although our long-term strategy is designed in part to increase our
share of the large and highly fragmented used equipment market, and market
share gains have tended not to have been directly impacted by economic
uncertainty, recent market conditions and the contraction of the used equipment
market have likely impacted our ability to grow our business.
We continue to believe our business model is generally well suited for all economic conditions and
our strategy is sound. We also believe that, over the long term, designing and executing our
strategy will continue to be a significant determinant of our ability to grow our earnings, in part
because our share of the world market for used equipment and trucks is so small.
Growth Strategies
Our long-term mission is to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and industrial assets
that allows our customers to easily and confidently exchange equipment. Our principal goals are to
grow our earnings per share at a manageable pace over the long term while maintaining a reasonable
return on invested capital, and to maintain and enhance the Ritchie Bros. culture. Our preference
is to pursue sustainable growth with a consistently high level of customer service, rather than
targeting aggressive growth and risking erosion of the strong customer relationships and high level
of customer service that we believe differentiate us from our competitors.
To grow our business, we are focusing simultaneously on three different fronts, and we believe
these three key components of our strategy work in unison.
People are a key driver of our growth, and one of our key strategies is to build the team that
will help us achieve our goals. This includes recruiting, training and developing the right
people, as well as enhancing the productivity of our sales force and our administrative support
teams by giving them the tools and training they need to be effective. This component of our
strategy also includes active succession planning and leadership development, with a focus on
developing employees from within our company.
Our ability to recruit, train and retain capable new members for our sales team has a
significant influence on our rate of growth. Ours is a relationship business and our Territory
Managers are the main point of contact with our customers. We look for bright, hard-working
individuals with positive attitudes, and we are committed to providing our people with a great
workplace and opportunities to grow with the Company and become future leaders of our global
team. Our long-term target is to increase our sales force by an average of 5-10% per year.
- 21 -
We intend to continue to expand our presence in existing markets and enter new markets, and to
expand our international auction site network to handle expected growth in our business. When
we talk about markets, we are referring to geographic markets and industry sectors.
Although we expect that most of our growth in the near future will come from expanding our
business and increasing our penetration in regions where we already have a presence, such as
the United States, Canada and Western Europe, we anticipate that emerging markets in developing
countries will be important in the longer term. Our sales offices in many of these emerging
markets have been established to position us to take advantage of these future growth
opportunities, and we anticipate continued investment in frontier markets in the future.
We plan to expand our worldwide network of auction sites, adding an average of at least one new
permanent auction site or regional auction unit to our network every year. In addition, we
intend to expand or replace existing auction sites as necessary to provide capacity for
increased sales volumes. Our auction site network supports our long-term growth, and is a
critical strategic advantage and helps us to sustain efficient and scalable growth. We also
intend to continue to hold offsite auctions in new regions to expand the scope of our
operations.
We also aim to increase our market share in our core markets of construction, transportation
and agricultural equipment, and to sell more assets in categories that are complementary to
these core markets. Examples of these complementary categories include mining, forestry and
petroleum assets.
We are committed to developing and continually refining the processes and systems that we use
to conduct our business. We believe that this continuous focus on improvement will allow us to
grow our revenues faster than our operating costs over the long term. We also intend to use
technology to facilitate our growth and enhance the quality and service level of our auctions.
Over the past few years, we have made significant progress in developing business processes and
systems that are efficient, consistent and scalable
We believe that these three components work together because our people help us to achieve our
growth objectives, our places give us focus areas for and the capacity to handle growth, and our
processes help us to achieve that growth with efficiency and consistency while continuing to
deliver value to our customers.
Strategy Execution in 2010
Highlights of the first nine months of 2010 included:
People
Our sales team has increased to 316 people, a 5% increase compared to the end of 2009. Because our
business depends on trusting relationships with our customers to generate consignments to our
auctions, it can often take two to three years for a sales person to achieve a suitable level of
productivity. However, we expect that investing in our sales force will help us to achieve our
longer-term growth strategies.
Places
In addition to the new sites added to our network in the first half of 2010 (Narita, Japan; Tipton,
California; St Louis, Missouri; Madrid, Spain; and Salt Lake City, Utah) we plan to add one
regional auction unit to our network during the fourth quarter of 2010 in Meppen, Germany.
- 22 -
Processes
We introduced our new Timed Auction system to an additional eight auction sites around the world in
the third quarter of 2010, bringing the total number of sites offering this service to eighteen.
This new technology is used to sell smaller items, such as consumer goods and equipment
attachments, in an online Timed Auction, without an auctioneer and therefore with more flexibility
and convenience for our bidders. In addition to offering greater convenience and choice for our
customers, this system enables us to sell lower-value lots more efficiently and at lower cost. We
intend to roll out our Timed Auction system to a further four auction sites during the remainder of
2010.
Strategy Update
We are currently finalizing our annual
strategy update process, identifying strategic initiatives to be undertaken over
the next few years that build off of our focus on people, places and processes.
Our strategic update process keeps our customers viewpoint at the forefront and
as a result, we intend to launch a number of new services starting in 2011. We
believe that these services will enhance our customers ability to easily and
confidently exchange equipment.
One of
the most significant initiatives we intend to launch during 2011 is a bundle of value-added buyer services that we
expect will help Ritchie Bros. customers feel more confident and make their
experience at our auctions as compelling and easy as possible. The bundle of
services is being developed in response to customer feedback and will include
such features as a customer finance program, enhanced equipment information and
other features. The introduction of these and other new services will continue
our efforts to extend the appeal of our auctions and enhance our ability to
attract new and existing customers to our auctions.
We also intend to revise and simplify our
fee structure effective July 1, 2011. Certain fees will be eliminated,
including the 2% fee charged on internet and proxy bid purchases, and we will
amend the administrative fee currently charged to buyers to address the cost of
providing the new and enhanced services, as well as other buyer-focused
initiatives launched in recent years. The current 10% administrative fee will
continue to be charged on all lots that sell for $2,500 or less; lots that sell
for more than $2,500 will attract a 2.5% administrative fee, with a maximum fee
of $950 per lot (or the near equivalent amount in the currency of the auction).
These new services and revised fee
structure will allow us to increase the value we provide to buyers and sellers,
which we believe will make their experience easier and give them a higher level
of confidence in our auctions. We expect that these changes will increase both
our auction revenues and our operating expenses, and will have a net positive
effect on earnings in 2011 and future years.
Operations
The majority of our industrial auctions are held at our permanent auction sites, where we own the
land and facilities, or at regional auction units, where we usually lease the land and typically
have more modest facilities. We also hold off-site auctions at temporary locations, often on land
owned by one of the main consignors to the particular auction. Most of our agricultural auctions
are off-site auctions that take place on the consignors farm. During the first nine months of
2010, 94% of our gross auction proceeds were attributable to auctions held at our permanent auction
sites and regional auction units (first nine months of 2009 91%). Gross auction proceeds
represent the total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions (please see Sources of Revenue
and Revenue Recognition below).
During the first nine months of 2010, we had approximately 247,000 bidder registrations at our
industrial auctions, which is consistent with the same period in 2009. Throughout our history,
consignors to our auctions have often developed their relationship with us starting as bidders at
our auctions.
We received nearly 31,000 industrial asset consignments (typically comprised of multiple lots)
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately 27,000 in the same
period in 2009. We handled approximately 213,000 lots, which is an increase from 209,000 lots in
the same period in 2009.
- 23 -
During the first nine months of 2010, we conducted 157 unreserved industrial auctions at locations
in North and Central America, Europe, the Middle East, Australia, and Asia (first nine months of
2009 138). We also held 90 unreserved agricultural auctions during the first nine months of 2010
in Canada (first nine months of 2009 108). Although our auctions vary in size, our average
industrial auction during the 12-month period ended September 30, 2010 attracted over 1,500 bidder
registrations (12 months ended September 30, 2009 over 1,600) and featured over 1,300 lots (12
months ended September 30, 2009 over 1,400) consigned by 189 consignors (12 months ended
September 30, 2009 185), generating average gross auction proceeds of approximately $14.9 million
per auction (12 months ended September 30, 2009 $16.9 million). Our agricultural auctions during
the same period averaged approximately $1.3 million in size (12 months ended September 30, 2009
$0.8 million).
We sold over $620 million of equipment, trucks, and other assets to online bidders during the first
nine months of 2010 compared to over $600 million in the first nine months of 2009. Our online
sales in 2010 continue to demonstrate our position as the worlds largest seller of industrial
equipment to online buyers.
Approximately 54% of our auction revenues in the first nine months of 2010 were earned from
operations in the United States (first nine months of 2009 55%), 22% from auctions in Canada
(first nine months of 2009 23%) and the remaining 24% from auctions in countries other than the
United States and Canada, primarily in Europe, the Middle East, Australia, and Mexico (first nine
months of 2009 22%). We had 1,176 full-time employees at September 30, 2010, including 316 sales
representatives and 12 trainee territory managers, compared to 1,140, 300 and 20 respectively, at
September 30, 2009.
We are a public company and our common shares are listed under the symbol RBA on the New York and
Toronto Stock Exchanges. On October 28, 2010, we had 105,602,136 common shares issued and outstanding and
stock options outstanding to purchase a total of 3,301,175 common shares.
Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition
Gross auction proceeds represent the total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions. Our
definition of gross auction proceeds may differ from those used by other participants in our
industry. Gross auction proceeds is an important measure we use in comparing and assessing our
operating performance. It is not a measure of our financial performance, liquidity or revenue and
is not presented in our consolidated financial statements. We believe that auction revenues, which
is the most directly comparable measure in our Statement of Operations, and certain other line
items, are best understood by considering their relationship to gross auction proceeds. Auction
revenues represent the revenues we earn in the course of conducting our auctions. The portion of
gross auction proceeds that we do not retain is remitted to our customers who consign the items we
sell at our auctions.
Auction revenues are comprised of auction commissions earned from consignors through straight
commission and guarantee contracts, net profits or losses on the sale of inventory items,
administrative and documentation fees on the sale of certain lots, auction advertising fees, and
the fees applicable to purchases made through our internet and proxy bidding systems. All revenue
is recognized when the auction sale is complete and we have determined that the auction proceeds
are collectible.
Straight commissions are our most common type of auction revenues and are generated by us when we
act as agent for consignors and earn a pre-negotiated, fixed commission rate on the gross sales
price of the consigned equipment at auction. In recent periods, straight commission sales have
represented approximately 75-80% of our gross auction proceeds volume on an annual basis.
In the normal course of business, we sometimes guarantee minimum sales proceeds to the consignor
and earn a commission based on the actual results of the auction, typically including a
pre-negotiated percentage of any sales proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. The consigned
equipment is sold on an unreserved basis in the same manner as other consignments. If the actual
auction proceeds are less than the guaranteed amount, our commission is reduced, and if the
proceeds are sufficiently less, we can incur a loss on the sale. We factor in a higher rate of
commission on these sales to compensate for the increased risk we assume.
- 24 -
Our financial exposure from guarantee contracts fluctuates over time, but in recent periods,
industrial and agricultural auction guarantees have had an average period of exposure (days
remaining until date of auction as at quarter-end) of approximately 30 days and 70 days,
respectively. At September 30, 2010, our outstanding industrial and agricultural guarantees
totalled approximately $52.1 million, of which approximately $30.8 million had already been sold at
our auctions as of the date of this discussion. The combined financial exposure from guarantee
contracts at any period end can fluctuate significantly depending on the timing of auctions;
however, the quarter-end balances averaged approximately $42 million over the last 12 months.
Losses, if any, resulting from guarantee contracts are recorded in the period in which the relevant
auction is completed, unless the loss is incurred after the period end but before the financial
reporting date, in which case the loss is accrued in the financial statements for the period end.
Auction revenues also include the net profit or loss on the sale of inventory in cases where we
acquire ownership of equipment for a short time prior to an auction sale. We purchase equipment for
specific auctions and sell it at those auctions in the same manner as consigned equipment. During
the period that we retain ownership, the cost of the equipment is recorded as inventory on our
balance sheet. The net gain or loss on the sale is recorded as auction revenues.
We generally refer to our guarantee and outright purchase business as our at risk, or underwritten,
business. In recent periods, our at risk business represented approximately 20-25% of gross auction
proceeds on an annual basis.
The choice by consignors between straight commission, guarantee, or outright purchase arrangements
depends on many factors, including the consignors risk tolerance and sale objectives. In addition
we do not have a target for the relative mix of contracts. As a result, the mix of contracts in a
particular quarter or year fluctuates and is not necessarily indicative of the mix in future
periods. The composition of our auction revenues and our auction revenue rate (i.e. auction
revenues as a percentage of gross auction proceeds) are affected by the mix and performance of
contracts entered into with consignors in the particular period and fluctuate from period to
period. Our auction revenue rate performance is presented in the table below.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our comparative historical auction revenue rates have been reclassified to conform
with the presentation adopted in 2008. The revised presentation had an insignificant
impact on auction revenue rates for the periods 2005 through 2007. On an annual basis, the
impact on auction revenue rates during this period was in the range of one to 12 basis
points. |
|
(2) |
|
The average auction revenue rate for the first quarter in 2010 includes the results
of the auction of Apoise; had these been excluded the auction revenue rate would have been
11.33%. |
- 25 -
Prior to 2008, our expected average annual auction revenue rate was in the range of 9.50% to
10.00%. At the beginning of 2008, we made changes to certain of our existing fees charged to our
customers, including the minimum commission rate applicable to low value lots and the consignor
document administration fee. These fees were increased slightly to reflect increased costs of
conducting auctions. In addition, effective January 2008, we made certain reclassifications in our
Statement of Operations that affected our auction revenue rate, including the reclassifications of
interest income from auction revenues to other income and auction advertising fees and
documentation fees from direct expenses to auction revenues. These changes were made to improve the
presentation in our financial statements and had no impact on our reported net earnings. As a
result of the changes to our existing fees and the reclassifications, we increased our expected
annual average auction revenue rate to be in the range of 9.75% to 10.25%. However, our past
experience has shown that our auction revenue rate is difficult to estimate precisely, meaning our
actual auction revenue rate in future periods may be above or below our expected range. For the
first nine months of 2010, we achieved an auction revenue rate of
10.85% (first nine months of 2009 10.77%).
In general, the largest contributor to the variability of our auction revenue rate is the
performance, rather than the amount, of our at risk business (guarantee and inventory contracts).
In a period when our at risk business performs better than average, our auction revenue rate
typically exceeds the expected average rate.
Conversely, if our at risk business performs below average, our auction revenue rate will typically
be below the expected average rate.
Our gross auction proceeds and auction revenues are influenced by the seasonal nature of the
auction business, which is determined mainly by the seasonal nature of the construction and natural
resources industries. Gross auction proceeds and auction revenues tend to be higher during the
second and fourth calendar quarters, during which time we generally conduct more business than in
the first and third calendar quarters. This seasonality contributes to quarterly variability in our
net earnings because a significant portion of our operating costs is relatively fixed.
Gross auction proceeds and auction revenues are also affected on a period-to-period basis by the
timing of major auctions. In newer markets where we are developing operations, the number and size
of auctions and, as a result, the level of gross auction proceeds and auction revenues, are likely
to vary more dramatically from period to period than in our established markets where the number,
size and frequency of our auctions are more consistent. In addition, economies of scale are
achieved as our operations in a region evolve from conducting intermittent auctions, to
establishing a regional auction unit, and ultimately to developing a permanent auction site.
Economies of scale are also achieved when our auctions increase in size.
Because of these seasonal and period-to-period variations, we believe that our gross auction
proceeds and auction revenues are best compared on an annual basis, rather than on a quarterly
basis.
Overall Performance
Our gross auction proceeds were $2.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to $2.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This slight decrease continues the
trend from 2009 where equipment owners (particularly in the United States) are reacting to the
unusual situation of low interest rates and generally more accommodating lenders.
During the first nine months of 2010, we recorded auction revenues of $269.1 million and net
earnings of $52.4 million, or $0.49 per diluted share. This performance compares to auction
revenues of $280.1 million and net earnings of $71.6 million, or $0.68 per diluted share, during
the first nine months of 2009. Our earnings decreased mainly as a result of higher depreciation and
general and administrative expenses. We ended the first nine months of 2010 with working capital of
$42.6 million, compared to $30.5 million at December 31, 2009.
- 26 -
Adjusted net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $51.6 million, or $0.49 per
diluted share, which compares to adjusted net earnings of $71.0 million, or $0.67 per diluted
share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We define adjusted net earnings as financial
statement net earnings excluding the after-tax effects of sales of excess property and significant
foreign exchange gains or losses resulting from financing activities that we do not expect to recur
in the future (please see our reconciliation below).
Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP measure that does not have a standardized meaning, and is
therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We believe
that comparing adjusted net earnings as defined above for different financial periods provides more
useful information about the growth or decline of our net earnings for the relevant financial
period, and identifies the impact of items which we do not consider to be part of our normal
operating results.
A reconciliation of our net earnings under Canadian GAAP to adjusted net earnings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
Net foreign exchange impact on
financing transactions, net of tax(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
Gain on sale of excess property(2) |
|
|
(1,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax relating to reconciling items |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings |
|
$ |
51,640 |
|
|
$ |
70,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a foreign exchange gain of
$759 ($664, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax) on U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held
by a subsidiary that has the Canadian dollar as its functional currency. We have highlighted
this amount because in January 2009, the Canadian subsidiary assigned the bank debt to an
affiliate whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar to eliminate the future impact of
currency fluctuations. We did not settle any long-term intercompany loans during the first
nine months of 2010 that resulted in a significant foreign exchange adjustment. We do not
expect the foreign exchange gains or losses on these financing transactions to recur in
future periods. |
|
(2) |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we completed the sale of our former
Houston, Texas, permanent auction site. |
Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
We conduct operations around the world in a number of different currencies, but our reporting
currency is the U.S. dollar. In the first nine months of 2010, approximately 40% of our revenues
and approximately 60% of our operating costs were denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar. The proportion of revenues denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar in a given
period will differ from the annual proportion depending on the size and location of auctions held
during the period.
The main currencies other than the U.S. dollar in which our revenues and operating costs are
denominated are the Canadian dollar and the Euro. In recent periods there have been significant
fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar and Euro relative to the U.S. dollar. These
fluctuations affect our reported auction revenues and operating expenses when non-U.S. dollar
amounts are converted into U.S. dollars for financial statement reporting purposes. It is
difficult, if not impossible, to quantify how foreign exchange rate movements affect such variables
as supply of and demand for the assets we sell. However, excluding these impacts, the effect of
foreign exchange fluctuations on our translated auction revenues and operating expenses in our
consolidated financial statements has largely offset, making the impact of the currency fluctuation
on our net earnings minimal.
- 27 -
United States Dollar Exchange Rate Comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
in U.S. $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average value of one U.S. dollar: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
1.0359 |
|
|
$ |
1.1700 |
|
|
|
-11 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
0.7611 |
|
|
|
0.7339 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Auction Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
269,072 |
|
|
$ |
280,068 |
|
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds |
|
$ |
2,479,205 |
|
|
$ |
2,600,910 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenue rate |
|
|
10.85 |
% |
|
|
10.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our auction revenues decreased in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the equivalent period
in 2009 primarily as a result of a lower gross auction proceeds, partially offset by higher auction
revenue rates. Our at risk business represented 22% of our total gross auction proceeds in the
first nine months of 2010 (first nine months of 2009 18%). The mix of contracts in the first nine
months of 2010 was roughly consistent with our experience in recent periods. During the first nine
months of 2010 our gross auction proceeds in local currency, being the U.S., Canadian and
Australian dollars and the Euro, decreased by 9% compared to the first nine months of 2009.
Our auction revenue rate for the first nine months of 2010 was 10.85%, which was higher than our
expected range of 9.75% to 10.25% mainly as a result of the performance of our at risk business.
The increase compared to our experience in the first nine months of 2009 related primarily to the
improved performance of our straight commission business, which performed better in the first nine
months of 2010 than in the first nine months of 2009. Our experience has shown that our auction
revenue rate is difficult to estimate precisely and our actual auction revenue rate in future
periods may be above or below our expected range.
Our auction revenues and our net earnings are influenced to a great extent by small changes in our
auction revenue rate. For example, a 10 basis point (0.1%) increase or decrease in our auction
revenue rate during the first nine months of 2010 would have impacted auction revenues by
approximately $2.5 million, of which approximately $1.8 million or $0.02 per common share would
have flowed through to net earnings after tax in our Statement of Operations, assuming no other
changes. This factor is important to consider when evaluating our current and past performance, as
well as when assessing future prospects.
Direct Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
$ |
34,833 |
|
|
$ |
35,481 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
Direct expenses as a percentage of
gross auction proceeds |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses are the costs we incur specifically to conduct an auction. Direct expenses include
the costs of hiring temporary personnel to work at the auction, advertising costs directly related
to the auction, travel costs for employees to attend and work at the auction, security hired to
safeguard equipment at the auction site and rental expenses for temporary auction sites. At each
quarter end, we estimate the direct expenses incurred with respect to auctions completed near the
end of the period. In the subsequent quarter, these accruals are adjusted, to the extent necessary,
to reflect actual costs incurred.
- 28 -
Our direct expense rate, which represents direct expenses as a percentage of gross auction
proceeds, fluctuates from period to period based in part on the size and location of the auctions
we hold during a particular period. The direct expense rate generally decreases as the average size
of our auctions increases. In addition, we usually experience lower direct expense rates for
auctions held at our permanent auction sites compared to auctions held at offsite locations, mainly
as a result of the economies of scale and other efficiencies that we typically experience at
permanent auction sites. Our direct expense rate for the first nine months of 2010 was higher than
the rate for the first nine months of 2009 in part because of a decrease in the average size of
auctions conducted at our permanent auction sites in the first nine of 2010. In addition, we held a
number of auctions in new markets, such as Turkey, Poland, India and Japan, which further
contributed to the increased rate.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
26,824 |
|
|
$ |
22,419 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Depreciation is calculated on either a straight line or a declining balance basis on capital assets
employed in our business, including buildings, computer hardware and software, automobiles and yard
equipment.
During the first nine months of 2010, we determined that certain assets on which depreciation was
charged had an indefinite life and therefore should not have been depreciated. The accumulated
depreciation on these assets was $2.7 million which was reversed in the first quarter of 2010 as an
immaterial adjustment, decreasing depreciation expense.
Offsetting this reduction in depreciation expense was an increase relating to new assets that we
have put into service in recent periods, such as our new permanent auction sites in Vancouver,
British Columbia; Narita, Japan; Mexico City, Mexico; Caorso, Italy; Madrid, Spain; and St Louis,
Missouri, and new computer hardware and software. We expect our depreciation in future periods to
increase in line with our on-going capital expenditures.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
134,219 |
|
|
$ |
123,308 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
General and administrative expenses, or G&A, include such expenditures as personnel (salaries,
wages, bonuses and benefits), information technology, non-auction related travel, repairs and
maintenance, leases and rentals and utilities and the resulting effects of foreign currency
fluctuations.
The increase in our G&A for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009
was primarily a result of currency fluctuations and higher costs relating to leases entered into
during the 12 months ended September 30, 2010.
Foreign currency fluctuations resulted in an increase in our G&A of approximately $6.1 million in
the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009 in connection with the
translation into U.S. dollars of our foreign operations G&A expenses.
Expenses
relating to facilities increased by $4.0 million over the same period in 2009 due to new
and renewed leases and property taxes.
- 29 -
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
|
913 |
% |
Interest expense is comprised mainly of interest paid on long-term debt and revolving credit
facilities. Interest expense increased in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period
in 2009 due primarily to additional debt taken on in the second and third quarters of 2009,
combined with a lower amount of interest capitalized to projects under development in 2010.
Interest expense varies depending on the amount of interest capitalized to auction site development
projects, which is driven by the number and size of projects that the Company has in progress
during a given period.
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
|
|
-18 |
% |
Interest income is earned on our excess cash and receivable balances interest. Our interest income
can fluctuate from period to period depending on our cash position, which is affected by the
timing, size and number of auctions held during the period, as well as the timing of the receipt of
auction proceeds from buyers and payments to consignors.
Foreign Exchange Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
(737 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Foreign exchange gains or losses arise when foreign currency denominated monetary items are
revalued to the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period.
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Capital Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of capital
assets |
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
The gain recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily on the sale of
our former Houston, Texas, permanent auction site, partially offset by losses on other assets.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
20,849 |
|
|
$ |
29,243 |
|
|
|
-29 |
% |
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes have been estimated using the tax rates in effect in each of the tax jurisdictions in
which we earn our income. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
consistent with the rate we experienced in the first nine months of 2009. Income tax rates in
future periods will fluctuate
depending upon the impact of unusual items and the level of earnings in the different tax
jurisdictions in which we earn our income.
- 30 -
Net Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
52,396 |
|
|
$ |
71,618 |
|
|
|
-27 |
% |
Net earnings per share basic |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
-26 |
% |
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
-28 |
% |
Our net earnings in the first nine months of 2010 decreased compared to the equivalent period in
2009 primarily due to the lower gross auction proceeds, increased general and administrative
expenses and depreciation in the first nine months of 2010, offset in part by a slightly increased
auction revenue rate. Adjusted net earnings (see discussion above under Overall Performance) for
the first nine months of 2010 were $51.6 million, or $0.49 per diluted share, which represents a
27% decrease over the adjusted net earnings of $71.0 million, or $0.67 per diluted share in the
first nine months of 2009.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
The proportion of revenues and expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollars in a
given period will differ from the annual proportion depending on the size and location of auctions
held during the period, but is usually roughly consistent with the rates we expect to experience on
a full year basis.
United States Dollar Exchange Rate Comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
in U.S. $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average value of one U.S. dollar: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
1.0391 |
|
|
$ |
1.0974 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
0.7733 |
|
|
|
0.6992 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Auction Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
82,229 |
|
|
$ |
75,934 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds |
|
$ |
750,912 |
|
|
$ |
693,288 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenue rate |
|
|
10.95 |
% |
|
|
10.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our auction revenues increased in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the equivalent period in
2009 as a result of higher gross auction proceeds. Our at risk business represented 23% of our
total gross auction proceeds in the third quarter of 2010 (third quarter of 2009 15%).
- 31 -
Direct Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
$ |
9,680 |
|
|
$ |
10,515 |
|
|
|
-8 |
% |
Direct expenses as a percentage of gross auction proceeds |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our direct expense rate fluctuates from period to period based in part on the size and location of
the auctions we hold during a particular period. At each quarter end, we estimate the direct
expenses incurred with respect to auctions completed near the end of the period. In the subsequent
quarter, these accruals are adjusted, to the extent necessary, to reflect actual costs incurred.
Our direct expense rate in the third quarter of 2010 was lower than the third quarter of 2009
primarily due to an increase proportion of sales occurring at our permanent auction sites and
regional auction units.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
11,277 |
|
|
$ |
7,823 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization in the third quarter of 2010 increased compared to the third quarter
of 2009 as a result of depreciation relating to new assets that we have put into service in recent
periods, such as new auction facilities and computer hardware and software. In the first six months
of 2010 we commenced depreciation of certain capital assets which have experienced a full quarter
of expense in the three months ended September 30, 2010.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
43,228 |
|
|
$ |
42,106 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
The increase in our G&A was primarily due to currency fluctuations and increased facilities costs.
The weaker U.S. dollar compared to the Canadian and Australian dollars during the third quarter of
2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009 resulted in an increase of approximately $0.4 million in
our G&A when our foreign operations expenses were translated into the U.S. dollar. Facilities
costs increased primarily due to new and renewed leases and property taxes.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
|
904 |
% |
Interest expense is comprised mainly of interest paid on long-term debt and revolving credit
facilities. Interest expense increased in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in
2009 primarily due to an increase in the level of our debt as well as a reduction of the amount of
interest capitalized to projects under development in 2010.
- 32 -
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
-60 |
% |
Interest income is earned on our excess cash and receivable balances. Interest income can fluctuate
from period to period depending on our cash position, which is affected by the timing, size and
number of auctions held during the period, as well as the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds
from buyers and payments to consignors.
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
(1,267 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Foreign exchange gains or losses arise when foreign currency denominated monetary items are
revalued to the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The gain or loss recognized in
any given period is affected by changes in foreign exchange rates as well as the composition of our
foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
|
$ |
2,474 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes have been estimated using the tax rates in effect in each of the tax jurisdictions in
which we earn our income. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was
higher than the rate experienced in the same quarter in 2009 as a result of a favourable tax
adjustment in the prior year of $1.9 million relating to uncertain tax positions. Income tax rates
in future periods will fluctuate depending upon the impact of unusual items and the level of
earnings in the different tax jurisdictions in which we earn our income.
Net Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
13,478 |
|
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Net earnings per share basic |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our net earnings in the third quarter of 2010 increased compared to the equivalent period in 2009
primarily as a result of increased auction revenues and decreased direct expenses which were offset
in party by higher depreciation costs. There were no items which we do not consider to be part of
our normal operating results in the third quarter; net earnings is the same as adjusted net
earnings (see discussion above under Overall Performance) for the third quarter of 2010.
- 33 -
Summary of Quarterly Results
The following tables present our unaudited consolidated quarterly results of operations for each of
our last eight fiscal quarters. This data has been derived from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements, which were prepared on the same basis as our annual audited consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for
the fair presentation of such information. These unaudited quarterly results should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, and our discussion above about the seasonality of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
Q1 2010(2) |
|
|
Q4 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds (5) |
|
$ |
750,912 |
|
|
$ |
951,634 |
|
|
$ |
776,659 |
|
|
$ |
891,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
82,229 |
|
|
$ |
103,300 |
|
|
$ |
83,544 |
|
|
$ |
97,143 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
12,800 |
(1) |
|
|
21,834 |
|
Adjusted net earnings |
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
25,362 |
|
|
|
12,800 |
(1) |
|
|
21,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
Adjusted net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3 2009 |
|
|
Q2 2009 |
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Q4 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds (5) |
|
$ |
693,288 |
|
|
$ |
1,109,331 |
|
|
$ |
798,291 |
|
|
$ |
853,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
75,934 |
|
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
83,675 |
|
|
$ |
81,693 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
12,892 |
|
|
|
38,847 |
|
|
|
19,879 |
(3) |
|
|
27,140 |
(3)(4) |
Adjusted net earnings |
|
|
12,892 |
|
|
|
38,847 |
|
|
|
19,215 |
|
|
|
19,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Adjusted net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the first quarter of 2010, we determined that certain assets on which depreciation
was charged had an indefinite life and therefore should not have been depreciated. The
accumulated depreciation on these assets was $2,668, which was reversed in the period as
an immaterial adjustment, resulting in a $2,668 decrease to depreciation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Results for the first quarter of 2010 included $46.8 million of gross auction
proceeds, $0.9 million of auction revenues and $0.2 million of direct expenses generated
from the auction of Apoise. |
|
(3) |
|
Net earnings included the impact of foreign exchange on U.S. dollar denominated bank
debt held by a Canadian subsidiary, which was assigned in January 2009 to an affiliate
whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar to eliminate the impact of currency
fluctuations on this debt in future periods. Please see further discussion above under
Overall Performance. The foreign exchange impact of this bank debt in the first quarter
of 2009 was a $759 gain ($664, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax). The impact in the
fourth quarter of 2008 was a $3,778 loss ($3,230, or $0.03 per diluted share, after tax). |
|
(4) |
|
Net earnings in the fourth quarter of 2008 included the reclassification of foreign
currency translation gain of $12,254 ($11,148, or $0.11 per diluted share, after tax)
relating to the settlement of foreign currency denominated intercompany loans. We have
highlighted these amounts as we do not expect these items to recur in future periods. |
|
(5) |
|
Gross auction proceeds represents the total proceeds from all items sold at our
auctions. Gross auction proceeds is not a measure of revenue and is not presented in our
consolidated financial statements. Please see further discussion above under Sources of
Revenue and Revenue Recognition. |
- 34 -
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
42,603 |
|
|
$ |
30,510 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Our cash position can fluctuate significantly from period to period, largely as a result of
differences in the timing, size and number of auctions, the timing of the receipt of auction
proceeds from buyers, and the timing of the payment of net amounts due to consignors. We generally
collect auction proceeds from buyers within seven days of the auction and pay out auction proceeds
to consignors approximately 21 days following an auction. If auctions are conducted near a period
end, we may hold cash in respect of those auctions that will not be paid to consignors until after
the period end. Accordingly, we believe that working capital, including cash, is a more meaningful
measure of our liquidity than cash alone. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our working
capital increased by $12.1 million, primarily as a result of positive operating results, offset by
our capital expenditures and dividends paid to shareholders.
There are a number of factors that could potentially impact our working capital, such as the volume
and profitability of our auctions and our capital expenditures. However, we have substantial
borrowing capacity in the event of any temporary working capital requirements.
At September 30, 2010 the Company held $29.3 million of short term debt, which consisted of draws
on the Companys revolving credit facilities with a weighted average interest rate of 1% per annum.
This left $409 million of unused credit facilities, which included a $119 million five-year
committed revolving credit facility expiring in January 2014, and a $192 million three-year
uncommitted non-revolving credit facility expiring in November 2011. We believe our existing
working capital and established credit facilities are sufficient to satisfy our present operating
requirements, as well as to fund future growth initiatives, such as property acquisitions and
development.
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
110,352 |
|
|
$ |
235,475 |
|
|
|
-53 |
% |
Investing |
|
|
(39,463 |
) |
|
|
(120,433 |
) |
|
|
-67 |
% |
Financing |
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
|
|
27,276 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Similar to the discussion above concerning our cash position, our cash provided by operations can
fluctuate significantly from period to period, largely as a result of differences in the timing,
size and number of auctions during the period, the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds from
buyers, and the timing of the payment of net amounts due to consignors. Therefore, we do not
believe that the change in our cash position provided by operations during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 is indicative of a trend.
Capital asset additions were $46.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared
to $117.3 million in the equivalent period of 2009. Our capital expenditures in the first nine
months of 2010 related primarily to the expansion of our existing permanent auction site in
Orlando, Florida; construction of new regional auction unit in Salt Lake City, Utah; and the
construction of our new permanent auction sites in St. Louis, Missouri, and Madrid, Spain. Capital
asset additions also included investments in computer software and hardware as part of our process
improvement initiatives, including our new website.
Based on our most recent review of our auction site development plans and process improvement
initiatives, we expect that our annual capital expenditures will be in the range of $70 to $80
million per year for the next several years. We intend to add auction facilities in selected
locations around the world as appropriate opportunities arise, either to replace existing
facilities or to establish new sites. We plan to add an average of one new permanent auction site
or regional auction unit to our network per year, as well as replacement facilities. Actual
expenditures will vary depending on the availability and cost of suitable expansion opportunities
and prevailing business and economic conditions. Depending on the scope of the required system
improvements, the process improvement expenditures will likely be primarily for hardware, the
development, purchase and implementation of software, and related systems. We expect to fund future
capital expenditures from operating cash flows and borrowings under credit facilities.
- 35 -
We declared and paid regular cash dividends of $0.105 per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
and $0.10 per share for each of the quarters ended December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2010. Total
dividend payments were $32.2 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to total dividend
payments of $29.4 million in the equivalent period of 2009. All dividends we have paid are
eligible dividends for Canadian income tax purposes unless indicated otherwise.
Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
Our long-term debt and available credit facilities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
133,102 |
|
|
$ |
130,394 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities total available: |
|
$ |
306,200 |
|
|
$ |
318,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities total unused: |
|
$ |
217,432 |
|
|
$ |
268,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-revolving credit facilities total available: |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-revolving credit facilities total unused: |
|
$ |
191,680 |
|
|
$ |
192,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused credit facilities |
|
$ |
409,112 |
|
|
$ |
460,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our credit facilities are with financial institutions in the United States, Canada, The Netherlands
and The United Kingdom. Certain of the facilities include commitment fees applicable to the unused
credit amount. As at September 30, 2010, we had fixed rate and floating rate long-term debt bearing
interest rates ranging from 1.8% to 6.4%. We were in compliance with all financial covenants
applicable to our debt at September 30, 2010.
Future scheduled interest payments on existing borrowings over the next five years and thereafter
under our existing long-term debt are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 2010 |
|
|
In 2011 |
|
|
In 2012 |
|
|
In 2013 |
|
|
In 2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments
on long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,573 |
|
|
$ |
4,641 |
|
|
$ |
4,608 |
|
|
$ |
4,450 |
|
|
$ |
3,769 |
|
|
$ |
5,120 |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
We conduct operations in local currencies in countries around the world, yet have the U.S. dollar
as our reporting currency. As a result we are exposed to currency fluctuations and exchange rate
risk. We cannot accurately predict the future effects of foreign currency fluctuations on our
financial condition or results of operations, or quantify their effects on the macroeconomic
environment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 40% of our revenues were
earned in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and approximately 60% of our operating costs were
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The proportion of revenues denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar in a given period will differ from the annual proportion
depending on the size and location of auctions held during the period. However, on an annual basis,
we expect these amounts to substantially offset and generally act as a natural hedge against
exposure to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar. We have not adopted a long-term hedging
strategy to protect against foreign currency fluctuations associated with our operations
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, but we may consider hedging specific
transactions if we deem it appropriate in the future.
- 36 -
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a net increase in our foreign currency
translation adjustment balance of $2.1 million, compared to an increase of $20.9 million in the
first nine months of 2009. Our foreign currency translation adjustment arises from the translation
of our net assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
We have not experienced significant interest rate exposure historically, as our long-term debt
generally bears fixed rates of interest. However, borrowings under our global revolving credit
facility are available at both fixed and floating rates of interest. If our portfolio of floating
rate debt increases, we may consider the use of interest rate swaps to mitigate our exposure to
interest rate fluctuations. As at September 30, 2010 we had a total of $30.0 million (December 31,
2009 $29.5 million) in revolving loans bearing floating rates of interest.
Although we cannot accurately anticipate the future effect of inflation on our financial condition
or results of operations, inflation historically has not had a material impact on our operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Legal and Other Proceedings
From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and
claims in the ordinary course of our business. Such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in
the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. We are not aware of any legal
proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material
adverse effect on us or on our financial condition or results of operations or that involve a claim
for damages, excluding interest and costs, in excess of 10% of our current assets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates since our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as at and for
the year ended December 31, 2009, which is included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 40-F.
International Financial Reporting Standards
In February 2008, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board confirmed its strategy of replacing
Canadian GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for Canadian publicly
accountable enterprises. IFRS is issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
IFRS will be effective for our interim and annual financial statements effective January 1, 2011.
The conversion to IFRS will impact our accounting policies, information technology and data
systems, internal control over financial reporting, and financial statement presentation and
disclosure. The transition may also impact our business processes and operations, including such
areas as contractual arrangements, debt covenants, and compensation arrangements.
- 37 -
We commenced our IFRS conversion project in 2007 and established a conversion plan and an IFRS
project team. We have identified the standards that have an impact on our financial statements,
business processes, key performance measures and information systems. We have presented and
discussed the following major identified differences with the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors:
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E): We have chosen to use the cost method under IFRS
and will review annually depreciation methods and useful lives. We have identified assets
meeting the investment property criteria under IAS 40: Investment Property; these will be
shown separately on the financial statements. We have also chosen to use the cost method
of accounting for these assets. Our annual impairment testing methodology will change as
we will be testing at the cash-generating unit level, rather than the reporting unit
level. We have not identified any indications of expected impairment to either PP&E or
goodwill on the date of transition to IFRS. |
|
|
|
Business Combinations that occurred prior to January 1, 2010 will remain unchanged,
subject to the requirements of appendix C of IFRS 1 First Time Adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards. From January 1, 2010 onwards we intend to account for all
business combinations in line with IFRS 3 Business Combinations for our IFRS financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
Leases will be assessed for classification as operating or finance leases under IAS 17
Leases. Our preliminary assessment has not indicated any change to the classification of
our leases currently recorded as operating leases. |
|
|
|
Income Taxes: Stock options issued which are tax deductible must be revalued at each
reporting date under IFRS. The temporary differences created by this revaluation will be
included in deferred tax. Furthermore, our future tax assets and liabilities recorded in
our consolidated balance sheets will be reclassified to be entirely non-current and
renamed deferred tax assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
Share Based Payment: Each instalment of option awards will be treated as a separate
option grant, and the fair value of each instalment will be amortized over each
instalments vesting period. |
The following IFRS 1 exemptions from retrospective application are available to us and may be used
on transition to IFRS:
|
|
|
Business Combinations: At the date of transition to IFRS on January 1, 2010, we will
apply IFRS 3 prospectively and use the exemption in IFRS to treat prior business
combinations in a manner consistent with Canadian GAAP. |
|
|
|
Share Based Payments: We have not elected to apply IFRS 2: Share Based Payments to
options granted before November 7, 2002 and those options that were granted after November
7, 2002 which were vested at January 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
Cumulative Translation Differences: We will reset cumulative translation differences
accumulated as at the date of transition to zero. The gain or loss on a subsequent
disposal of any foreign operation will then exclude translation differences that arose
before the date of transition, but include all later translation differences. |
We have completed the preparation of our opening balance sheet as at January 1, 2010 under IFRS. As
a result we have determined that the impact to our retained earnings is limited to the following
areas:
|
|
|
Share based payment revaluation of separate instalments; and |
|
|
|
Cumulative translation differences accumulated at the date of transition. |
- 38 -
The
estimated impact to retained earnings from pre-changeover Canadian
GAAP to IFRS is approximately as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Retained earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
411,300 |
|
Share based payment revaluation of separate instalments(1) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Cumulative translation differences set to nil |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings under IFRS |
|
$ |
427,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This adjustment arises solely on the 2009 grants of options vesting over more than
one year. |
We have
also estimated that we will have reclassifications on the opening balance sheet related
to the following approximate amounts:
|
|
|
Assets held for sale ($3.7 million) from non-current to current; |
|
|
|
Current portion of deferred tax ($0.7 million) from current to non-current; |
|
|
|
Revaluation of deferred tax on share based payments that are deductible for tax
purposes ($1.7 million) increasing deferred tax asset and additional paid-in capital; |
|
|
|
Financial assets ($0.1 million current and $5.1 million non-current) from other assets
to a separate line item; and |
|
|
|
Investment properties ($8.5 million) from property, plant and equipment to a separate
line item. |
During the third quarter of 2010, we substantially completed the preparation of our interim
reconciliations for the periods ending March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 under IFRS and determined
that there is no material impact on net earnings for those periods. We have also substantially
completed our shell annual consolidated financial statements including explanatory notes under
IFRS.
As the IASB will continue to issue new accounting standards during our conversion period the final
impact of IFRS on the presentation of our financial position and results of operations and our
financial statement disclosure will only be measured once the IFRS applicable at our conversion
date are known. In particular, we are closely monitoring the IASBs projects on: leases;
provisions; financial statement presentation presentation of items of other comprehensive income;
financial instruments classification and measurement; revenue recognition; and the annual
improvements process.
As the new accounting policies under IFRS are finalized, a review of the integrity of our internal
control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures will be completed. At this
time, we believe that the current framework is sufficiently robust to incorporate the changes to
the financial reporting processes. We have identified areas where additional controls may be
implemented in 2010 to mitigate risk of material misstatement for our transition to IFRS financial
reporting. We will investigate these further and implement as appropriate during the run-up to
January 1, 2011.
We have conducted training sessions targeted to various levels of our organization. We also plan to
continue to provide training to other key employees. During the second quarter of 2010 we rolled
out a training course to our controllers in operations around the world.
We will monitor the impact of the IFRS transition on our information systems. Our accounting system
will be adjusted to accommodate the additional requirements of IFRS.
We continue to consider the impact of conversion on our business processes and operations. Business
processes and operations include contractual arrangements, debt covenants, and compensation
arrangements. At present, we predict minimal impact of the conversion project on our business
processes and operations. We will also develop a broader external communication plan.
- 39 -
Our transition plans relating to IFRS are on schedule, and a timetable for developing the opening
balance sheet and comparative information for the 2011 financial reporting is mapped out for 2010.
We will continue to provide updates on the status of key activities for this project in our
quarterly and annual Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations throughout the period to initial adoption on January 1, 2011.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on
current expectations and estimates about our business, and include, among others, statements
relating to:
|
|
|
our future performance; |
|
|
|
growth of our operations; |
|
|
|
growth of the world market for used equipment and trucks; |
|
|
|
increases in the number of consignors and bidders participating in our auctions; |
|
|
|
the impact of the current economic environment on our operations, capital resources,
and customers, including the number of bidders and buyers attending our auctions and
consignment volumes at those auctions; the demand for our services during challenging
economic times; our bidders ability to access credit to fund their purchases; and the
impact of the economic environment on equipment prices, supply and demand, risk and our
business model; |
|
|
|
our principal operating strengths, our competitive advantages, and the appeal of our
auctions to buyers and sellers of industrial assets; |
|
|
|
our ability to draw consistently significant numbers of local and international
end-user bidders to our auctions; |
|
|
|
our long-term mission to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and
industrial assets; |
|
|
|
our people, including our ability to recruit, train, retain and develop the right
people to help us achieve our goals and the desired increase in our sales force; |
|
|
|
our places, including our ability to add the capacity necessary to accommodate our
growth; our ability to increase our market share in our core markets and regions; and our
ability to expand into complimentary market sectors and new geographic markets, including
our ability to take advantage of growth opportunities in emerging markets; the acquisition
and development of auction facilities and the related impact on our capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
our processes, including our process improvement and system continuity initiatives and
their effect on our business, results of operations and capital expenditures, particularly
our ability to grow revenues faster than operating costs; |
|
|
|
the relative percentage of gross auction proceeds represented by straight commission,
guarantee and inventory contracts; |
|
|
|
our auction revenue rates and the sustainability of those rates, as well as the
seasonality of gross auction proceeds and auction revenues; |
- 40 -
|
|
|
our direct expense and income tax rates, depreciation expenses and general and
administrative expenses; |
|
|
|
our future capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
our internet initiatives and the level of participation in our auctions by internet
bidders; |
|
|
|
the proportion of our revenues and operating costs denominated in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar or the effect of any currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations on
our results of operations; |
|
|
|
financing available to us and the sufficiency of our working capital to meet our
financial needs; and |
|
|
|
our conversion to IFRS, including the impact of conversion on our business processes
and operations. |
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by such words as anticipate, believe,
could, feel, continue, estimate, expect, intend, may, ongoing, plan, potential,
predict, will, should, would, could, likely, generally, future, period to period,
long term, or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance
and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. While we have not
described all potential risks related to our business and owning our common shares, the important
factors listed under Risk Factors below are those that we consider may affect our performance
significantly or could cause our actual financial and operational results to differ significantly
from our predictions. Except as required by applicable securities law and regulations of relevant
securities exchanges, we do not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if
our predictions have been affected by new information, future events or other developments. You
should consider our forward-looking statements in light of these and other relevant factors.
Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and our past performance is no
guarantee of our performance in future periods. Some of the more important risks that we face are
outlined below and holders of our common shares should consider these risks. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair
our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of
operations and financial condition would suffer.
Damage to our reputation for fairness, integrity and conducting only unreserved auctions could harm
our business.
Strict adherence to the unreserved auction process is one of our founding principles and, we
believe, one of our most significant competitive advantages. Closely related to this is our
reputation for fairness and honesty in our dealings with our customers. Our ability to attract new
customers and continue to do business with existing customers could be harmed if our reputation for
fairness, integrity and conducting only unreserved auctions was damaged. If we are unable to
maintain our reputation and police and enforce our policy of conducting unreserved auctions, we
could lose business and our results of operations would suffer.
- 41 -
Decreases in the supply of, demand for, or market values of industrial assets, primarily used
industrial equipment, could harm our business.
Our auction revenues could be reduced if there was significant erosion in the supply of, demand
for, or market values of used industrial equipment, which would affect our financial condition and
results of operations. We have no control over any of the factors that affect the supply of, and
demand for, used industrial equipment, and the circumstances that cause market values for
industrial equipment to fluctuate including, among other things, economic uncertainty,
disruptions to credit and financial markets, a sustained economic recession, lower commodity
prices, and our customers restricted access to capital are beyond our control. Any increase in
the volume or change in the mix of equipment at our auctions may not be sufficient to offset
declines in the market value for that equipment as a result of the current economic environment. In
addition, price competition and availability of industrial equipment directly affect the supply of,
demand for, and market value of used industrial equipment. Climate change initiatives, including
significant changes to engine emission standards applicable to certain industrial assets, may also
impact the supply of, demand for or market values of those industrial assets.
We may incur losses as a result of our guarantee and outright purchase contracts and advances to
consignors.
In recent periods, approximately 75-80% of our business has been conducted on a straight commission
basis. In certain other situations we will either offer to:
|
|
|
guarantee a minimum level of sale proceeds to the consignor, regardless of the ultimate
selling price of the consignment at the auction; or |
|
|
|
purchase the equipment outright from the consignor for sale in a particular auction. |
The level of guaranteed proceeds or inventory purchase price is based on appraisals performed on
equipment by our internal personnel. Inaccurate appraisals could result in guarantees or inventory
values that exceed the realizable auction proceeds. If auction proceeds are less than the
guaranteed amount, our commission will be reduced or, if sufficiently lower, we will incur a loss.
If auction proceeds are less than the purchase price we paid for equipment that we take into
inventory temporarily, we will incur a loss. Because all of our auctions are unreserved, there is
no way for us to protect against these types of losses by bidding on or acquiring any of the items
at the auction. In recent periods, guarantee and inventory contracts have generally represented
approximately 20-25% of our annual gross auction proceeds.
Occasionally we advance to consignors a portion of the estimated auction proceeds prior to the
auction. We generally make these advances only after taking possession of the assets to be
auctioned and upon receipt of a security interest in the assets to secure the obligation. If we
were unable to auction the assets or if auction proceeds were less than amounts advanced, we could
incur a loss.
We may have difficulties sustaining and managing our growth.
One of the main elements of our strategy is to continue to grow our business, primarily by
increasing our presence in markets in which we already operate and by expanding into new geographic
markets and market segments in which we have not had a significant presence in the past. As part of
this strategy, we may from time to time acquire additional assets or businesses from third parties.
We may not be successful in growing our business or in managing this growth. For us to grow our
business successfully, we need to accomplish a number of objectives, including:
|
|
|
recruiting and retaining suitable sales and managerial personnel; |
|
|
|
identifying and developing new geographic markets and market sectors; |
|
|
|
identifying and acquiring, on terms favourable to us, suitable land on which to build
new auction facilities and, potentially, businesses that might be appropriate acquisition
targets; |
|
|
|
managing expansion successfully; |
|
|
|
obtaining necessary financing on terms favourable to us, and securing the availability
of our credit facilities to fund our growth initiatives; |
|
|
|
introducing new products and services to our customers with success; |
|
|
|
receiving necessary authorizations and approvals from governments for proposed
development or expansion; |
|
|
|
successfully executing strategic initiatives; |
- 42 -
|
|
|
integrating successfully new facilities and any acquired businesses into our existing
operations; |
|
|
|
achieving acceptance of the auction process in general by potential consignors, bidders
and buyers; |
|
|
|
establishing and maintaining favourable relationships with consignors, bidders and
buyers in new markets and market sectors, and maintaining these relationships in our
existing markets; |
|
|
|
succeeding against local and regional competitors in new geographic markets; |
|
|
|
capitalizing on changes in the supply of and demand for industrial assets, in our
existing and new markets; and |
|
|
|
designing and implementing business processes and operating systems that are able to
support profitable growth. |
We will likely need to hire additional employees to manage our growth. In addition, growth may
increase the geographic scope of our operations and increase demands on both our operating and
financial systems. These factors will increase our operating complexity and the level of
responsibility of existing and new management personnel. It may be difficult for us to attract and
retain qualified sales personnel, managers and employees, and our existing operating and financial
systems and controls may not be adequate to support our growth. We may not be able to improve our
systems and controls as a result of increased costs, technological challenges, or lack of qualified
employees. Our past results and growth may not be indicative of our future prospects or our ability
to expand into new markets, many of which may have different competitive conditions and demographic
characteristics than our existing markets.
In addition, we continue to pursue our strategy of investing in our people, places and processes to
give us the capacity to handle expected future growth, including investments in frontier markets
that may not generate profitable growth in the near term. Planning for future growth requires
investments to be made now in anticipation of growth that may not materialize, and if we are not
successful growing our gross auction proceeds our earnings may be adversely impacted. A large
component of our G&A expenses is considered fixed costs that we will incur regardless of gross
auction proceeds growth. There can be no assurances that our gross auction proceeds and auction
revenues will grow, if at all, at a more rapid rate than our fixed costs, especially in the event
of a deep and prolonged recession, which would have a negative impact on our margins and earnings
per share.
Our future expenses may increase significantly or our operations and ability to expand may be
limited as a result of environmental and other regulations.
A variety of federal, provincial, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including local tax
and accounting rules, apply to our business. These relate to, among other things, the auction
business, imports and exports of equipment, worker safety, privacy of customer information, and the
use, storage, discharge and disposal of environmentally sensitive materials. Complying with
revisions to laws, rules and regulations could result in an increase in expenses and a
deterioration of our financial performance. Failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and
regulations could result in substantial liability to us, suspension or cessation of some or all of
our operations, restrictions on our ability to expand at present locations or into new locations,
requirements for the acquisition of additional equipment or other significant expenses or
restrictions.
The development or expansion of auction sites depends upon receipt of required licenses, permits
and other governmental authorizations. Our inability to obtain these required items could harm our
business. Additionally, changes or concessions required by regulatory authorities could result in
significant delays in, or prevent completion of, such development or expansion.
- 43 -
Under some environmental laws, an owner or lessee of, or other person involved in, real estate may
be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances located on or
in, or emanating from, the real estate, and related costs of investigation and property damage.
These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner, lessee or other person knew
of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental
contamination may exist at our owned or leased auction sites, or at other sites on which we may
conduct auctions, or properties that we may be selling by auction, from prior activities at these
locations or from neighbouring properties. In addition, auction sites that we acquire or lease in
the future may be contaminated, and future use of or conditions on any of our properties or sites
could result in contamination. The costs related to claims arising from environmental contamination
of any of these properties could harm our financial condition and results of operations.
There are restrictions in the United States and Europe that may affect the ability of equipment
owners to transport certain equipment between specified jurisdictions. One example of these
restrictions is environmental certification requirements in the United States, which prevent
non-certified equipment from entering into commerce in the United States. If these restrictions, or
changes to environmental laws, were to inhibit materially the ability of customers to ship
equipment to or from our auction sites, they could reduce gross auction proceeds and harm our
business.
International bidders and consignors could be deterred from participating in our auctions if
governmental bodies impose additional export or import regulations or additional duties, taxes or
other charges on exports or imports. Reduced participation by international bidders and consignors
could reduce gross auction proceeds and harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Disruptions to credit and financial markets and economic uncertainty could harm our operations.
The recent global economic and financial market events have caused, among other things, a general
tightening in credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, increases in default and bankruptcy rates,
and a level of uncertainty in the used equipment marketplace, all of which may have a negative
impact on our operations, financial condition and liquidity and ability to grow our business. Our
operations and access to our cash balances in the future are dependent upon the economic viability
of our key suppliers and the various financial institutions we utilize. Our future operations may
be disrupted if we cannot obtain products and services necessary for our auction operations from
our key suppliers, or if we lose access to our cash balances. In addition, our future auction
revenues may decrease if our consignors choose not to sell their assets as a result of economic
conditions, or if our buyers are unable to obtain financing for assets purchases, or if our
customers are in financial distress. In addition, our lenders may be unable to advance funds to us
under existing credit facilities, which could harm our liquidity and ability to operate or grow our
business. Our customers may decide to delay the sale of excess assets due to the uncertainty in the
used equipment marketplace and the reduction in prices which could limit the growth in our gross
auction proceeds. The timing and nature of any recovery in credit and financial markets remain
uncertain, and there can be no assurance that market conditions will improve in the near future and
that our results of operations will not be adversely affected.
Competition in our core markets could result in reductions in our future revenues and
profitability.
The used truck and equipment sectors of the global industrial equipment market, and the auction
segment of those markets, are highly fragmented. We compete directly for potential purchasers of
industrial equipment with other auction companies. Our indirect competitors include equipment
manufacturers, other third party methods, and equipment rental companies. When sourcing equipment
to sell at our auctions, we compete with other auction companies, other third party methods, and
equipment owners that have traditionally disposed of equipment in private sales.
Our direct competitors are primarily regional auction companies. Some of our indirect competitors
have significantly greater financial and marketing resources and name recognition than we do. New
competitors with greater financial and other resources may enter the industrial equipment auction
market in the future. Additionally, existing or future competitors may succeed in entering and
establishing successful operations in new geographic markets prior to our entry into those markets.
They may also compete against us through internet-based services. If existing or future competitors
seek to gain or retain market share by reducing commission rates, we may also be required to reduce
commission rates, which may reduce our revenue and harm our operating results and financial
condition, or we may lose market share.
- 44 -
Our substantial international operations expose us to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and
political and economic instability that could harm our results of operations.
We conduct business in many countries around the world and intend to continue to expand our
presence in international markets, including emerging markets. Fluctuating currency exchange rates,
acts of terrorism or war, and changing social, economic and political conditions and regulations,
including income tax and accounting regulations, and political interference, may negatively affect
our business in international markets and our related results of operations. Currency exchange rate
fluctuations between the different countries in which we conduct our operations impact the
purchasing power of buyers, the motivation of consignors, asset values and asset flows between
various countries, including those in which we do not have operations. These factors and other
global economic conditions may harm our business and our operating results.
Although we report our financial results in U.S. dollars, a significant portion of our auction
revenues is generated at auctions held outside the United States, mostly in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. Currency exchange rate changes against the U.S. dollar, particularly for the
Canadian dollar and the Euro, could affect the presentation of our results in our financial
statements and cause our earnings to fluctuate.
Our business could be harmed if we lost the services of one or more key personnel.
The growth and performance of our business depends to a significant extent on the efforts and
abilities of our executive officers and senior managers. Our business could be harmed if we lost
the services of any of these individuals. We do not maintain key man insurance on the lives of any
of our executive officers. Our future success largely depends on our ability to attract, develop
and retain skilled employees in all areas of our business, and to plan effectively for succession.
Our internet-related initiatives are subject to technological obsolescence and potential service
interruptions and may not contribute to improved operating results over the long-term; in addition,
we may not be able to compete with technologies implemented by our competitors.
We have invested significant resources in the development of our internet platform, including our
online bidding service, Timed Auction system and new website. We use and rely on intellectual
property owned by third parties, which we license for use in providing our online bidding service.
Our internet technologies may not result in any material long-term improvement in our results of
operations or financial condition and may require further significant investment to avoid
obsolescence. We may also not be able to continue to adapt our business to internet commerce and we
may not be able to compete effectively against internet auction services offered by our
competitors.
The success of our online bidding service and other services that we offer over the internet,
including equipment-searching capabilities and historical price information, will continue to
depend largely on the performance and reliability of the hardware and software we utilize, our
ability to use suitable intellectual property licensed from third parties, further development and
maintenance of our information technology infrastructure and the internet in general. Our ability
to offer online services depends on the performance of the internet, as well as some of our
internal hardware and software systems.
Viruses, worms and other similar programs, which have in the past caused periodic outages and
other internet access delays, may in the future interfere with the performance of the internet and
some of our internal systems. These outages and delays could reduce the level of service we are
able to offer over the internet. We could lose customers and our reputation could be harmed if we
were unable to provide services over the internet at an acceptable level of performance or
reliability.
- 45 -
Our business is subject to risks relating to our ability to safeguard the security and privacy of
our customers confidential information.
We maintain proprietary databases containing confidential personal information about our customers
and the results of our auctions, and we must safeguard the security and privacy of this
information. Despite our efforts to protect this information, we face the risk of inadvertent
disclosure of this sensitive information or an intentional breach of our security measures.
Security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and
possible liability. We may be required to make significant expenditures to protect against security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Our insurance policies may not be
adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.
The availability and performance of our internal technology infrastructure, as well as the
implementation of an enterprise resource planning system, are critical to our business.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our website, enterprise resource
planning system, processing systems and network infrastructure are important to our reputation and
our business. We will need to continue to expand and upgrade our technology, transaction processing
systems and network infrastructure both to meet increased usage of our online bidding service and
other services offered on our website and to implement new features and functions. Our business and
results of operations could be harmed if we were unable to expand and upgrade in a timely manner
our systems and infrastructure to accommodate any increases in the use of our internet services, or
if we were to lose access to or the functionality of our internet systems for any reason.
We use both internally developed and licensed systems for transaction processing and accounting,
including billings and collections processing. We have recently improved these systems to
accommodate growth in our business. If we are unsuccessful in continuing to upgrade our technology,
transaction processing systems or network infrastructure to accommodate increased transaction
volumes, it could harm our operations and interfere with our ability to expand our business.
We may incur losses if we are required to make payments to buyers and lienholders because we are
unable to deliver clear title on the assets sold at our auctions.
In jurisdictions where title registries are commercially available, we guarantee to our buyers that
each item purchased at our auctions is free of liens and other encumbrances, up to the purchase
price paid at our auction. If we are unable to deliver clear title, we provide the buyer with a
full refund of the purchase price. While we exercise considerable effort to ensure that all liens
have been identified and, if necessary, discharged prior to the auction, we occasionally do not
properly identify or discharge liens and have had to make payments to the relevant lienholders or
purchasers. We will incur a loss if we are unable to recover sufficient funds from the consignors
to offset these payments, and aggregate losses from these payments could be material.
We may incur losses as a result of legal and other claims.
We are subject to legal and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While
the results of these claims have not historically had a material effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations, we may not be able to defend ourselves adequately against these
claims in the future and we may incur losses. Aggregate losses from and the legal fees associated
with these claims could be material.
- 46 -
We do not currently have a complete business continuity plan, which exposes our business to risks.
We depend on our information and other systems and processes for the continuity and effective
operation of our business. We have a formal business continuity plan covering most significant
aspects of our business that would take effect in the event of a significant interruption to our
business, or the loss of key systems as a result of a natural or other disaster. Although we have
tested our business continuity plan as part of the implementation, there can be no assurance that
it will operate effectively or that our business, results of operations and financial condition
will not be materially affected in the event of a significant interruption of our business.
We are in the process of implementing a formal disaster recovery plan, including a data center
co-location that went into effect in 2009. However, our disaster recovery plan is not yet complete.
If we were subject to a disaster or serious security breach, it could materially damage our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur as a result of our operations.
We maintain property and general liability insurance. This insurance may not remain available to us
at commercially reasonable rates, and the amount of our coverage may not be adequate to cover all
liability that we may incur. Our auctions generally involve the operation of large equipment close
to a large number of people, and despite our focus on safe work practices, an accident could damage
our facilities or injure auction attendees. Any major accident could harm our reputation and our
business. In addition, if we were held liable for amounts exceeding the limits of our insurance
coverage or for claims outside the scope of our coverage, the resulting costs could harm our
results of operations and financial condition.
Certain global conditions may affect our ability to conduct successful auctions.
Like most businesses with global operations, we are subject to the risk of certain global
conditions, such as pandemics or other disease outbreaks, that could hinder our ability to conduct
our scheduled auctions, or restrict our customers travel patterns or their desire to attend
auctions. If this situation were to occur, we may not be able to generate sufficient equipment
consignments to sustain our business or to attract enough bidders to our auctions to achieve world
fair market values for the items we sell. This could harm our results of operations and financial
condition.
Our operating results are subject to quarterly variations.
Historically, our revenues and operating results have fluctuated from quarter to quarter. We expect
to continue to experience these fluctuations as a result of the following factors, among others:
|
|
|
the size, timing and frequency of our auctions; |
|
|
|
the seasonal nature of the auction business in general, with peak activity typically
occurring in the second and fourth calendar quarters, mainly as a result of the seasonal
nature of the construction and natural resources industries; |
|
|
|
the performance of our at risk business; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions in our markets; and |
|
|
|
the timing of acquisitions and development of auction facilities and related costs. |
In addition, we usually incur substantial costs when entering new markets, and the profitability of
operations at new locations is uncertain as a result of the increased variability in the number and
size of auctions at new sites. These and other factors may cause our future results to fall short
of investor expectations or not to compare favourably to our past results.
- 47 -
We may not continue to pay regular cash dividends.
We declared and paid total quarterly cash dividends of $0.305 per outstanding common share in the
first nine months of 2010. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at
the discretion of our Board of Directors, after taking into account our operating results,
financial condition, cash requirements, financing agreement restrictions and other factors our
Board may deem relevant. We may be unable or may elect not to continue to declare and pay
dividends, even if necessary financial conditions are met and sufficient cash is available for
distribution.
The impact of the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2011 is
uncertain.
We, as a publicly accountable Canadian enterprise, are required by the Canadian Accounting
Standards Board to adopt IFRS beginning January 2011. We will not be able to determine the full
impact of the adoption of IFRS on our consolidated financial statements until the completion of the
first annual financial statements under IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2011. This is due to
the continually changing IFRS and guidance issued by the IASB and Canadian Securities
Administrators.
- 48 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 2, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Jeremy Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Black, |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary |