10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Commission file number: 0-31164
Preformed Line Products Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Ohio   34-0676895
     
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
660 Beta Drive    
Mayfield Village, Ohio   44143
     
(Address of Principal Executive Office)   (Zip Code)
(440) 461-5200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (S232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange act.
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of common shares outstanding as of August 1, 2010: 5,253,534.
 
 

 

 


 

Table of Contents
         
    Page  
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    16  
 
       
    26  
 
       
    26  
 
       
       
 
       
    26  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    30  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
                 
    June 30     December 31  
Thousands of dollars, except share and per share data   2010     2009  
 
               
ASSETS
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 22,110     $ 24,097  
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $1,157 ($995 in 2009)
    51,894       49,245  
Inventories — net
    57,131       56,036  
Deferred income taxes
    3,452       3,256  
Prepaids
    3,705       3,214  
Prepaid taxes
    3,759       1,049  
Other current assets
    1,241       2,062  
 
           
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
    143,292       138,959  
 
               
Property and equipment — net
    68,304       67,766  
Patents and other intangibles — net
    7,501       8,087  
Goodwill
    6,654       6,925  
Deferred income taxes
    5,038       4,358  
Other assets
    9,287       9,277  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 240,076     $ 235,372  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Notes payable to banks
  $ 3,268     $ 3,181  
Current portion of long-term debt
    1,080       1,330  
Trade accounts payable
    20,405       18,764  
Accrued compensation and amounts withheld from employees
    11,167       8,345  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    7,490       8,375  
Accrued profit-sharing and other benefits
    2,652       3,890  
Dividends payable
    1,091       1,076  
Income taxes payable and deferred income taxes
    1,522       1,379  
 
           
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
    48,675       46,340  
 
               
Long-term debt, less current portion
    3,704       3,099  
Unfunded pension obligation
    9,202       8,678  
Income taxes payable, noncurrent
    1,722       1,898  
Deferred income taxes
    852       1,515  
Other noncurrent liabilities
    2,924       3,021  
 
               
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
PLPC Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock — $2 par value per share, 15,000,000 shares authorized, 5,253,306 and 5,248,298 issued and outstanding, net of 553,747 and 554,059 treasury shares at par, respectively
    10,507       10,497  
Paid in capital
    7,301       5,885  
Retained earnings
    171,048       165,953  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (15,591 )     (11,369 )
 
           
TOTAL PLPC SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    173,265       170,966  
 
           
Noncontrolling interest
    (268 )     (145 )
 
           
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    172,997       170,821  
 
           
 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 240,076     $ 235,372  
 
           
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

 

3


Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
                                 
    Three month periods ended June 30     Six month periods ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (Thousands of dollars, except share and per share data)  
 
Net sales
  $ 82,137     $ 59,568     $ 151,045     $ 118,262  
Cost of products sold
    54,682       39,718       103,565       79,834  
 
                       
GROSS PROFIT
    27,455       19,850       47,480       38,428  
 
                               
Costs and expenses
                               
Selling
    7,038       5,526       13,540       10,890  
General and administrative
    9,666       7,371       19,144       14,423  
Research and engineering
    2,700       2,159       5,559       4,220  
Other operating expense (income)
    1,135       (311 )     990       (22 )
 
                       
 
    20,539       14,745       39,233       29,511  
 
                       
 
                               
OPERATING INCOME
    6,916       5,105       8,247       8,917  
 
                               
Other income (expense)
                               
Interest income
    94       87       177       212  
Interest expense
    (126 )     (107 )     (296 )     (216 )
Other income
    409       178       760       657  
 
                       
 
    377       158       641       653  
 
                       
 
                               
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    7,293       5,263       8,888       9,570  
 
                               
Income taxes
    1,197       1,721       1,758       3,311  
 
                       
 
                               
NET INCOME
    6,096       3,542       7,130       6,259  
 
                               
Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax
          (42 )     (98 )     (47 )
 
                       
 
                               
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLPC
  $ 6,096     $ 3,584     $ 7,228     $ 6,306  
 
                       
 
                               
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               
Net income attributable to PLPC common shareholders
  $ 1.16     $ 0.69     $ 1.38     $ 1.21  
 
                       
 
                               
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               
Net income attributable to PLPC common shareholders
  $ 1.13     $ 0.68     $ 1.34     $ 1.19  
 
                       
 
                               
Cash dividends declared per share
  $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.40     $ 0.40  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding — basic
    5,253       5,231       5,253       5,228  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding — diluted
    5,402       5,311       5,401       5,306  
 
                       
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

 

4


Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
                 
    Six month periods ended June 30  
    2010     2009  
    (Thousands of dollars)  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
Net income
  $ 7,130     $ 6,259  
 
               
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    4,042       3,404  
Provision for accounts receivable allowances
    277       345  
Provision for inventory reserves
    737       1,548  
Deferred income taxes
    (1,164 )     95  
Share-based compensation expense
    1,383       669  
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
          (75 )
Net investment in life insurance
    (26 )     (33 )
Unrealized foreign currency gain on hedge contract
    (451 )      
Other — net
    (5 )     (9 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (3,586 )     (4,947 )
Inventories
    (2,113 )     431  
Trade accounts payables and accrued liabilities
    4,446       3,154  
Income taxes payable
    (627 )     517  
Other — net
    (3,331 )     (144 )
 
           
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
    6,712       11,214  
 
               
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Capital expenditures
    (6,606 )     (4,198 )
Business acquisitions
          (433 )
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations
          750  
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
    225       89  
 
           
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
    (6,381 )     (3,792 )
 
               
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Increase (decrease) in notes payable to banks
    (3 )     818  
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
    11,946       706  
Payments of long-term debt
    (11,471 )     (250 )
Dividends paid
    (2,167 )     (2,125 )
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
          75  
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
    84       188  
Purchase of common shares for treasury
    (21 )     (57 )
 
           
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
    (1,632 )     (645 )
 
               
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    (686 )     1,055  
 
           
 
               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (1,987 )     7,832  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    24,097       19,869  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
  $ 22,110     $ 27,701  
 
           
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

 

5


Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
In thousands, except share and per share data, unless specifically noted
NOTE A — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Preformed Line Products Company and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “PLPC”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. However, in the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements contain all estimates and adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, required to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
NOTE B — OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
Inventories — net
                 
    June 30     December 31  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Finished products
  $ 27,404     $ 26,161  
Work-in-process
    4,365       3,473  
Raw materials
    33,644       34,788  
 
           
 
    65,413       64,422  
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost
    (5,108 )     (4,463 )
Noncurrent portion of inventory
    (3,174 )     (3,923 )
 
           
 
               
 
  $ 57,131     $ 56,036  
 
           
Noncurrent inventory is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and is principally comprised of raw materials.

 

6


Table of Contents

Property and equipment — net
Major classes of property and equipment are stated at cost and were as follows:
                 
    June 30     December 31  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Land and improvements
  $ 7,009     $ 7,188  
Buildings and improvements
    51,772       51,297  
Machinery and equipment
    106,566       104,179  
Construction in progress
    5,734       6,068  
 
           
 
    171,081       168,732  
Less accumulated depreciation
    102,777       100,966  
 
           
 
  $ 68,304     $ 67,766  
 
           
Comprehensive income (loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six month periods ended June 30 are as follows:
                                                 
    PLPC     Noncontrolling interest     Total  
    Three month period     Three month period     Three month period  
    ended June 30     ended June 30     ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 6,096     $ 3,584     $     $ (42 )   $ 6,096     $ 3,542  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                               
Change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
          88                         88  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (4,140 )     9,172       41       9       (4,099 )     9,181  
Recognized net actuarial loss, net of tax
    30       84                   30       84  
 
                                   
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    (4,110 )     9,344       41       9       (4,069 )     9,353  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 1,986     $ 12,928     $ 41     $ (33 )   $ 2,027     $ 12,895  
 
                                   
                                                 
    PLPC     Noncontrolling interest     Total  
    Six month period     Six month period     Six month period  
    ended June 30     ended June 30     ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 7,228     $ 6,306     $ (98 )   $ (47 )   $ 7,130     $ 6,259  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                               
Change in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
                                   
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (4,310 )     5,923       25       6       (4,285 )     5,929  
Recognized net actuarial loss, net of tax
    88       167                   88       167  
 
                                   
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    (4,222 )     6,090       25       6       (4,197 )     6,096  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 3,006     $ 12,396     $ (73 )   $ (41 )   $ 2,933     $ 12,355  
 
                                   
Legal proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation incidental to its business. The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that the Company believes would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

7


Table of Contents

NOTE C — PENSION PLANS
PLP-USA hourly employees of the Company who meet specific requirements as to age and service are covered by a defined benefit pension plan. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for this plan. Net periodic benefit cost for this plan included the following components:
                                 
    Three month period ended June 30     Six month period ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Service cost
  $ 185     $ 216     $ 407     $ 431  
Interest cost
    276       292       598       584  
Expected return on plan assets
    (240 )     (183 )     (480 )     (366 )
Recognized net actuarial loss
    49       132       140       264  
 
                       
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 269     $ 457     $ 665     $ 913  
 
                       
During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, no contributions have been made to the plan. The Company presently anticipates making no contributions to fund the plan in 2010.
NOTE D — COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share were computed by dividing net income attributable to PLPC common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per share were calculated by dividing net income attributable to PLPC common shareholders by the weighted-average of all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the periods presented.
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
                                 
    For the three month period ended June 30     For the six month period ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Numerator
                               
Net income attributable to PLPC
  $ 6,096     $ 3,584     $ 7,228     $ 6,306  
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator
                               
Determination of shares
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    5,253       5,231       5,253       5,228  
Dilutive effect — share-based awards
    149       80       148       78  
 
                       
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
    5,402       5,311       5,401       5,306  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per common share attributable to PLPC shareholders
                               
Basic
  $ 1.16     $ 0.69     $ 1.38     $ 1.21  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted
  $ 1.13     $ 0.68     $ 1.34     $ 1.19  
 
                       
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, 41,500 and 32,500 stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to the average market price being lower than the exercise price, and as such the stock options are anti-dilutive. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, 43,450 and 13,000 stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to the average market price being lower than the exercise price, and as such the stock options are anti-dilutive.

 

8


Table of Contents

NOTE E — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
The Company’s finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of the following:
                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Gross Carrying     Accumulated  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount     Amortization  
 
                               
Finite-lived intangible assets
                               
Patents
  $ 4,826     $ (3,370 )   $ 4,827     $ (3,213 )
Land use rights
    1,227       (62 )     1,365       (55 )
Trademark
    313       (43 )     311        
Customer relationships
    5,359       (749 )     5,372       (520 )
 
                       
 
  $ 11,725     $ (4,224 )   $ 11,875     $ (3,788 )
 
                       
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
                               
 
                           
Goodwill
  $ 6,654             $ 6,925          
 
                           
The Company performs its annual impairment test for goodwill utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology, market comparables, and an overall market capitalization reasonableness test in computing fair value by reporting unit. The Company then compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value to assess if goodwill has been impaired. Based on the assumptions as to growth, discount rates and the weighting used for each respective valuation methodology, results of the valuations could be significantly changed. However, the Company believes that the methodologies and weightings used are reasonable and result in appropriate fair values of the reporting units.
The Company performed its annual impairment test for goodwill as of January 1, 2010, and determined that no adjustment to the carrying value was required. The aggregate amortization expense for other intangibles with finite lives for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 was $.2 million and $.4 million. The aggregate amortization expense for other intangibles with finite lives for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 was $.1 million and $.2 million. Amortization expense is estimated to be $.9 million for 2010, $.7 million for 2011, $.8 million for 2012 and 2013 and $.7 million for 2014.
The Company’s only intangible asset with an indefinite life is goodwill. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, are as follows:
                                         
    Australia     South Africa     Poland     All Other     Total  
 
                                       
Balance at January 1, 2010
  $ 2,243     $ 52     $ 1,161     $ 3,469     $ 6,925  
Currency translation
    (92 )     (2 )     (178 )     1       (271 )
 
                             
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $ 2,151     $ 50     $ 983     $ 3,470     $ 6,654  
 
                             
NOTE F — SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The 1999 Stock Option Plan
The 1999 Stock Option Plan (the Plan) permits the grant of 300,000 options to buy common shares of the Company to certain employees at not less than fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. At June 30, 2010 there were no shares remaining to be issued under the Plan. Options issued to date under the Plan vest 50% after one year following the date of the grant, 75% after two years, and 100% after three years and expire from five to ten years from the date of grant. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises will be funded with the issuance of new shares.
There were no options granted during the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

 

9


Table of Contents

Activity in the Plan for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted        
            Weighted     Average        
            Average     Remaining     Aggregate  
    Number of     Exercise Price     Contractual     Intrinsic  
    Shares     per Share     Term (Years)     Value  
 
                               
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
    85,502     $ 33.29                  
Granted
        $ 0.00                  
Exercised
    (4,696 )   $ 15.13                  
Forfeited
        $ 0.00                  
 
                             
Outstanding (vested and expected to vest) at June 30, 2010
    80,806     $ 34.34       5.8     $ 226  
 
                             
Exercisable at June 30, 2010
    69,056     $ 32.94       5.1     $ 226  
 
                             
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $.1 million and $.4 million. Cash received for the exercise of stock options during 2010 was $.1 million. There were no excess tax benefits from stock based awards for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded compensation expense related to the stock options currently vesting, reducing income before taxes and net income by less than $.1 million for both periods. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized at June 30, 2010 is expected to be a combined total of $.2 million over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.
Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008
Under the Preformed Line Products Company Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008 (the “LTIP Plan”), certain employees, officers, and directors will be eligible to receive awards of options and restricted shares. The purpose of this LTIP Plan is to give the Company and its subsidiaries a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining, and motivating officers, employees, and directors and to provide an incentive to those individuals to increase shareholder value through long-term incentives directly linked to the Company’s performance. The total number of Company common shares reserved for awards under the LTIP Plan is 400,000. Of the 400,000 common shares, 300,000 common shares have been reserved for restricted share awards and 100,000 common shares have been reserved for share options. The LTIP Plan expires on April 17, 2018.
Restricted Share Awards
For all of the participants except the CEO, a portion of the restricted share award is subject to time-based cliff vesting and a portion is subject to vesting based upon the Company’s performance over a three year period. All of the CEO’s restricted shares are subject to vesting based upon the Company’s performance over a three year period.
The restricted shares are offered at no cost to the employees; however, the participant must remain employed with the Company until the restrictions on the restricted shares lapse. The fair value of a restricted share award is based on the market price of a common share on the grant date. The Company currently estimates that no awards will be forfeited. Dividends declared in 2009 and thereafter will be accrued in cash dividends. In 2008, dividends were reinvested in additional restricted shares, and held subject to the same vesting requirements as the underlying restricted shares.

 

10


Table of Contents

A summary of the restricted share awards for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
                                 
    Restricted Share Awards  
    Performance             Total     Weighted Average  
    and Service     Service     Restricted     Grant-Date  
    Required     Required     Awards     Fair Value  
Nonvested as of January 1, 2010
    115,346       12,475       127,821     $ 38.28  
Granted
    66,973       7,303       74,276       35.75  
Vested
                       
Forfeited
                       
 
                         
Nonvested as of June 30, 2010
    182,319       19,778       202,097     $ 37.35  
 
                       
For time-based restricted shares the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award in General and administrative expense in the accompanying statement of consolidated income. Compensation expense related to the time-based restricted shares for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $.1 million. As of June 30, 2010, there was $.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to time-based restricted share awards that is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining period of approximately 1.4 years.
For the performance-based awards, the number of restricted shares in which the participants will vest depends on the Company’s level of performance measured by growth in pretax income and sales over a requisite performance period. Depending on the extent to which the performance criterions are satisfied under the LTIP Plan, the participants are eligible to earn common shares over the vesting period. Performance-based compensation expense for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $1.1 million and $.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the remaining performance-based restricted share awards compensation expense of $3.8 million is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately 1.1 years.
In the event of a Change in Control, vesting of the restricted shares will be accelerated and all restrictions will lapse. Unvested performance-based awards are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares awarded at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on achievement of performance-based award objectives.
To satisfy the vesting of its restricted share awards, the Company has reserved new shares from its authorized but unissued shares. Any additional granted awards will also be issued from the Company’s authorized but unissued shares. Under the LTIP Plan, there are 97,903 common shares currently available for additional restricted share grants.
Share Option Awards
The LTIP plan permits the grant of 100,000 share options to buy common shares of the Company to certain employees at not less than fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. At June 30, 2010 there were 89,000 shares remaining available for issuance under the LTIP Plan. Options issued to date under the Plan vest 50% after one year following the date of the grant, 75% after two years, and 100% after three years and expire from five to ten years from the date of grant. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises will be funded with the issuance of new shares.
The Company has elected to use the simplified method of calculating the expected term of the stock options and historical volatility to compute fair value under the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. zero coupon Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. Forfeitures have been estimated to be zero.
There were no options granted for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

 

11


Table of Contents

Activity in the Company’s plan for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted        
            Weighted     Average        
            Average     Remaining     Aggregate  
    Number of     Exercise Price     Contractual     Intrinsic  
    Shares     per Share     Term (Years)     Value  
 
                               
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
    11,000     $ 38.76                  
Granted
        $ 0.00                  
Exercised
        $ 0.00                  
Forfeited
        $ 0.00                  
 
                             
Outstanding (vested and expected to vest) at June 30, 2010
    11,000     $ 38.76       9.5     $ 0  
 
                             
Exercisable at June 30, 2010
                       
 
                             
There were no stock options exercised under the LTIP Plan during the six month period ended June 30, 2010. There were no excess tax benefits from stock based awards for the six month period ended June 31, 2010.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded compensation expense related to the stock options currently vesting, reducing income before taxes and net income by less than $.1 million and zero, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized at June 30, 2010 is expected to be a combined total of $.1 million over a weighted average period of approximately 2.3 years.
NOTE G — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The carrying value of the Company’s current financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and short-term debt, approximates its fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. At June 30, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated using discounted cash flows analysis, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements which are considered to be level two inputs. There have been no transfers in or out of level two for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Based on the analysis performed, the fair value and the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt are as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Fair Value     Carrying Value     Fair Value     Carrying Value  
 
                               
Long-term debt and related current maturities
  $ 4,724     $ 4,784     $ 4,617     $ 4,429  
 
                       
As a result of being a global company, the Company’s earnings, cash flows and financial position are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Company’s primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage foreign currency risks. The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and carry these instruments at fair value. The Company does not enter into any trading or speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments.
During June 2010, the Company entered into a forward foreign exchange contract to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar which closed on July 30, 2010. This contract was effective as a hedge from an economic perspective, but was not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes under ASC 815. The Company entered into this contract with a global financial institution that the Company believes to be creditworthy.
Foreign currency derivative instruments outstanding are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, the gains and losses related to mark-to-market adjustments were recognized as other income and expense on the statement of consolidated income during the period in which the derivative instruments were outstanding.

 

12


Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a forward foreign currency contract with an exercise value of $12.9 million which matured on July 28, 2010 at a forward rate of NZD $1.00=$.6632 USD. The unrealized gain recognized into earnings as a result of revaluing the instrument to fair value on June 30, 2010 was $.5 million which was included in other income (expense) in the statement of consolidated income and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Fair value of $13.3 million was determined using the market approach by references to quoted prices in active markets for similar assets, which is Level 2 as defined in the fair value hierarchy.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                     
        Asset Derivative  
        Fair Value at June 30,  
Derivative Not Designated as Hedging Instrument   Balance Sheet Classification   2010     2009  
 
                   
Foreign exchange forward contracts
  Other current assets   $ 451.0     $  
The following table shows the effects of the Company’s derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
                     
        Amount of Gain (Loss)  
    Location of Gain or (loss)   Recognized in Earnings  
    Recognized in Income on   On Derivative at June 30,  
Derivative not Desigated as Hedging Instruments   Derivative   2010     2009  
 
                   
Foreign exchange forward contracts
  Other income (expense)   $ 451.0     $  
NOTE H — RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB updated guidance included in FASB ASC 810-10, related to the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance will require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this updated guidance amends the quantitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810-10 amends certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and adds additional reconsideration events for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Further, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This updated guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period and interim reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to require disclosure of the transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a schedule for Level 3 that separately identifies purchases, sales, issuances and settlements and requires more detailed disclosures regarding valuation techniques and inputs. The Company adopted this new standard effective January 1, 2010 and it had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
NOTE I — RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for sales arrangements that include multiple products or services by revising the criteria for when deliverables may be accounted for separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is necessary to separately account for each product or service. This hierarchy provides more options for establishing selling price than existing guidance. ASU 2009-13 is required to be applied prospectively to new or materially modified revenue arrangements in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2009-13 will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and related disclosures; however no effect is expected.

 

13


Table of Contents

ASU No. 2009-05 (ASC Topic 820), which amends Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Overall, ASU No. 2009-13 (ASC Topic 605), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, ASU No. 2009-14 (ASC Topic 985), Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements, and various other ASU’s No. 2009-2 through ASU No. 2010-19 which contain technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance to specialized industries or entities, were recently issued. These updates have no current applicability to the Company or their effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.
NOTE J — SEGMENT INFORMATION
The following tables present a summary of the Company’s reportable segments for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Financial results for the PLP-USA segment include the elimination of all segments’ intercompany profit in inventory.
                                 
    Three month period ended June 30     Six month period ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net sales
                               
PLP-USA
  $ 30,666     $ 26,028     $ 57,147     $ 54,699  
Australia
    13,287       6,260       24,178       11,942  
Brazil
    7,637       5,690       16,264       10,882  
South Africa
    2,969       2,293       5,780       4,147  
Canada
    3,026       3,200       5,614       5,555  
Poland
    4,090       2,737       7,403       5,695  
All Other
    20,462       13,360       34,659       25,342  
 
                       
Total net sales
  $ 82,137     $ 59,568     $ 151,045     $ 118,262  
 
                       
 
                               
Intersegment sales
                               
PLP-USA
  $ 2,205     $ 1,545     $ 3,327     $ 3,075  
Australia
    157       19       208       34  
Brazil
    212       230       1,082       970  
South Africa
    122       192       230       204  
Canada
    224       80       394       116  
Poland
    137       306       311       744  
All Other
    6,662       2,771       11,109       5,230  
 
                       
Total intersegment sales
  $ 9,719     $ 5,143     $ 16,661     $ 10,373  
 
                       

 

14


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three month period ended June 30     Six month period ended June 30  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Income taxes (benefit)
                               
PLP-USA
  $ (40 )   $ 1,218     $ (468 )   $ 2,139  
Australia
    342       21       597       49  
Brazil
    (323 )     31       (75 )     89  
South Africa
    250       116       438       236  
Canada
    219       277       370       422  
Poland
    111       32       149       138  
All Other
    638       26       747       238  
 
                       
Total income taxes
  $ 1,197     $ 1,721     $ 1,758     $ 3,311  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income
                               
PLP-USA
  $ 1,834     $ 1,094     $ 805     $ 2,250  
Australia
    560       62       1,018       112  
Brazil
    702       51       1,167       145  
South Africa
    642       304       1,125       611  
Canada
    489       616       825       938  
Poland
    424       123       556       548  
All Other
    1,445       1,292       1,634       1,655  
 
                       
Total net income
    6,096       3,542       7,130       6,259  
Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax
          (42 )     (98 )     (47 )
 
                       
Net income attributable to PLPC
  $ 6,096     $ 3,584     $ 7,228     $ 6,306  
 
                       
                 
    June 30     December 31  
    2010     2009  
 
Assets
               
PLP-USA
  $ 69,250     $ 65,266  
Australia
    34,353       31,269  
Brazil
    24,608       25,194  
South Africa
    8,567       7,081  
Canada
    9,661       9,006  
Poland
    12,914       14,777  
All Other
    80,354       82,330  
 
           
 
    239,707       234,923  
Corporate assets
    369       449  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 240,076     $ 235,372  
 
           
NOTE K — INCOME TAXES
The Company’s effective tax rate was 16% and 33% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 20% and 35% for six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The lower effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 is primarily due to the favorable benefit from foreign earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax rates, a favorable tax incentive for technological innovation, and the decrease of unrecognized tax benefits effectively settled through audits.
The Company provides valuation allowances against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had gross unrecognized tax positions of approximately $1.1 million. Under the provisions of ASC 740 Income Taxes, the Company may decrease its unrecognized tax benefits by $.1 million within the next twelve months due to the expiration of statues of limitations. The Company recognized less than $.2 million of a decrease in unrecognized tax benefit for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to settlement of unrecognized tax benefits.
NOTE L — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 30, 2010, the Company completed the business combination acquiring all of the outstanding equity of Electropar Limited (Electropar) for NZ$20.5 million or $13.3 million USD in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities, subject to a customary post-closing working capital adjustment. Electropar designs, manufacturers and markets pole line and substation hardware for the global electrical utility industry. Electropar is based out of New Zealand with a subsidiary operation in Australia. The acquisition of Electropar will strengthen the Company’s position in the power distribution, transmission and substation hardware markets and will expand its presence in the Asia-Pacific region.

 

15


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Preformed Line Products Company (the “Company”, “PLPC”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) was incorporated in Ohio in 1947. We are an international designer and manufacturer of products and systems employed in the construction and maintenance of overhead and underground networks for the energy, telecommunication, cable operators, information (data communication), and other similar industries. Our primary products support, protect, connect, terminate, and secure cables and wires. We also provide solar hardware systems and mounting hardware for a variety of solar power applications. Our goal is to continue to achieve profitable growth as a leader in the innovation, development, manufacture, and marketing of technically advanced products and services related to energy, communications, and cable systems and to take advantage of this leadership position to sell additional quality products in familiar markets.
The reportable segments are PLP-USA, Australia, Brazil, South Africa, Canada, Poland, and All Other. Our PLP-USA segment is comprised of our U.S. operations primarily supporting our domestic energy and telecommunications products. The Australia segment is comprised of all of our operations in Australia supporting energy, telecommunications, data communications and solar products. Our South Africa and Brazil segments are comprised of the manufacturing and sales operations from those locations which meet at least one of the criteria of a reportable segment. Our final two segments are Poland and Canada, which are comprised of a manufacturing and sales operation, and have been included as segments to comply with reporting segments for 75% of consolidated sales. Our remaining operations are included in the All Other segment as none of these operations meet, or the future estimated results are not expected to meet the criteria for a reportable segment.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On May 15, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement with Tony Lachlan Wallace, Grant Lachlan Wallace and Helen Amelia Wallace each of Auckland, New Zealand as trustees of the Wallace Family Trust, Grant Lachlan Wallace, Tony Lachlan Wallace and Alison Kay Wallace each of Auckland, NZ, as trustees of the T&A Wallace Family Trust, and Cameron Wallace Trust (collectively, “Sellers”) for the Sale and Purchase of Shares in Electropar Limited, a New Zealand corporation. Electropar Limited (Electropar) designs, manufactures and markets pole line and substation hardware for the global electrical utility industry. Electropar is based out of New Zealand with a subsidiary operation in Australia. The acquisition of Electropar will strengthen our position in the power distribution, transmission and substation hardware markets and will expand our presence in the Asia-Pacific region.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PLPC acquired all of the outstanding equity of Electropar for NZ$20.5 million or $13.3 million USD subject to a customary post-closing working capital adjustment. In addition, we may be required to make an additional earn-out consideration payment to the Sellers up to NZ$2 million based on Electropar achieving a financial performance target (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) for the 12 month period following closing. In addition, the Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions. The acquisition of Electropar closed on July 30, 2010.
On December 18, 2009, PLPC and Tyco Electronics Group S.A. (Tyco Electronics) completed a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which, PLPC acquired from Tyco Electronics its Dulmison business for $16 million and the assumption of certain liabilities. The acquisition of Dulmison strengthened our position in the power distribution and transmission hardware market and expanded our presence in the Asia-Pacific region. As a result of the acquisition, we added operations in Indonesia and Malaysia and strengthened our existing positions in Australia, Thailand, Mexico and the United States.

 

16


Table of Contents

Preface
Our net sales for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $22.6 million, or 38%, and gross profit increased $7.6 million, or 38%, compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Our net sales increase was caused by a 49% increase in foreign net sales in addition to a 25% increase in U.S. net sales. Our financial results are subject to fluctuation results in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. Of the 38% increase in net sales, 6% was from the favorable effect on the change in the translation rate of local currencies as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar to certain weaker foreign currencies compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, sales and gross profit increased 32% compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, costs and expenses increased $5.1 million, or 34%, as foreign costs and expenses increased $2.5 million and U.S. costs and expenses increased $2.6 million. As a result of the preceding, excluding the effect of currency translation, net income increased $2.3 million compared to 2009.
Our net sales for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $32.8 million, or 28%, and gross profit increased $9.1 million, or 24%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Our net sales increase was caused by a 64% increase in total foreign net sales coupled with a 9% increase in U.S. net sales. Our financial results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. Of the 28% increase in net sales, 9% was from the favorable effect on the change in the translation rate of local currencies as a result of the U.S. dollar to certain weaker foreign currencies compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, gross profit increased 14% compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, cost and expenses increased $7.6 million, or 26%, as U.S. and foreign costs and expenses both increased $3.8 million. As a result of the preceding, excluding the effect of currency translation, net income increased $.3 million compared to 2009.
Despite the recent global economic downturn, we are seeing an improvement in our global marketplace and our financial condition continues to remain strong. We continue to generate cash flows from operations, have proactively managed working capital and have controlled capital spending. We currently have a debt to equity ratio of 5% and can borrow needed funds at an attractive interest rate under our credit facility. While current worldwide conditions necessitate that we concentrate our efforts on maintaining our financial strengths, we believe there are many available opportunities for growth. We are pursuing these opportunities as appropriate in the current environment in order to position ourselves for when the economic recovery ultimately happens.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) Our discussions of the financial results include non-GAAP measures (primarily the impact of foreign currency) to provide additional information concerning our financial results and provide information that is useful to the assessment of our performance and operating trends.

 

17


Table of Contents

THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s consolidated income statements for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009. The Company’s past operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
                                 
    Three month period ended June 30  
Thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     % Change  
Net sales
  $ 82,137     $ 59,568     $ 22,569       38 %
Cost of products sold
    54,682       39,718       14,964       38  
 
                       
Gross profit
    27,455       19,850       7,605       38  
 
                       
Gross profit as percentage of net sales
    33 %     33 %                
 
                               
Costs and expenses
    20,539       14,745       5,794       39  
Costs and expenses as percentage of net sales
    25 %     25 %                
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    6,916       5,105       1,811       35  
 
                       
Other income
    377       158       219       139  
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    7,293       5,263       2,030       39  
Income before income taxes as percentage of net sales
    9 %     9 %                
 
                               
Income taxes
    1,197       1,721       (524 )     (30 )
 
                       
Net income
  $ 6,096     $ 3,542     $ 2,554       72 %
 
                       
Net Sales. For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, net sales were $82.1 million, an increase of $22.6 million, or 38%, from the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net sales increased 32% as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Three month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     tranlation     change  
Net sales
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 30,666     $ 26,028     $ 4,638     $     $ 4,638       18 %
Australia
    13,287       6,260       7,027       1,933       5,094       81  
Brazil
    7,637       5,690       1,947       1,043       904       16  
South Africa
    2,969       2,293       676       329       347       15  
Canada
    3,026       3,200       (174 )     363       (537 )     (17 )
Poland
    4,090       2,737       1,353       201       1,152       42  
All Other
    20,462       13,360       7,102       (208 )     7,310       55  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 82,137     $ 59,568     $ 22,569     $ 3,661     $ 18,908       32 %
 
                                   
The increase in PLP-USA net sales of $4.6 million, or 18%, was primarily due to sales volume increases of $2.8 million, sales mix increases of $2.3 million partially offset by lower average sales prices when compared to 2009. International net sales for the three month period ended June 30, 2010, were favorably affected by $3.7 million when converted to U.S. dollars, as a result of the U.S. dollar compared to certain weaker foreign currencies. The following discussions of international net sales exclude the effect of currency translation. Australia net sales increased $5.1 million, or 81%, as a result of higher sales volume of $4 million primarily related to the Dulmison acquisition in December 2009 coupled with a $.6 million increase in sales related to BlueSky, and higher energy sales volume. Brazil net sales increased $.9 million, or 16%, primarily as a result of higher sales volume. South Africa net sales increased $.3 million, or 15%, as a result of increased energy sales. Canada net sales decreased $.5 million, or 17%, due to lower sales volume in their domestic markets primarily due to a one-time sales project in 2009. Poland net sales increased $1.2 million, or 42%, due primarily to an increase in sales volume as a result of an improvement in Poland’s overall economy. All Other net sales increased $7.3 million, or 55%, due to an overall increase in sales volume coupled with an estimated $3.7 million in net sales realized through the acquisition entered into in December 2009 reported in All Other.

 

18


Table of Contents

Gross profit. Gross profit of $27.5 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $7.6 million, or 38%, compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, gross profit increased 32% as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Three month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     translation     change  
Gross profit
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 9,729     $ 8,808     $ 921     $     $ 921       10 %
Australia
    4,416       1,694       2,722       661       2,061       122  
Brazil
    2,048       1,302       746       269       477       37  
South Africa
    1,461       901       560       162       398       44  
Canada
    1,357       1,435       (78 )     161       (239 )     (17 )
Poland
    1,304       800       504       58       446       56  
All Other
    7,140       4,910       2,230       (38 )     2,268       46  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 27,455     $ 19,850     $ 7,605     $ 1,273     $ 6,332       32 %
 
                                   
PLP-USA gross profit of $9.7 million increased $.9 million compared to 2009. PLP-USA gross profit increased $1.6 million due to higher sales partially offset by an increase in material costs. International gross profit for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was favorably impacted by $1.3 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009. The following discussion of international gross profit excludes the effect of currency translation. The Australia gross profit increase of $2.1 million was the result of $1.4 million from higher net sales and a $.8 million improvement in manufacturing efficiencies partially offset by higher material costs. Brazil’s gross profit increase of $.5 million was primarily the result of an increase in sales volume of $.2 million coupled with an improvement in product margins. The South Africa gross profit increase of $.4 million was a result of an increase in overall product margins of $.3 million due primarily to better product mix compared to 2009, coupled with $.1 million from higher net sales. Canada’s gross profit decrease of $.2 million was a result of $.3 million from lower sales volume partially offset by an improvement in product margins. Poland’s gross profit increase of $.4 million was a result of $.5 million from higher sales volume coupled with an improvement in manufacturing efficiencies of $.6 million partially offset by an increase in material costs of $.7 million. The increase in All Other gross profit of $2.3 million was the result of our legacy subsidiaries located in our All Other reportable segment contributed 60% of the gross profit increase and our new locations acquired as part of the Dulmison acquisition in December 2009 contributed the other 40% of the improvement in gross profit. The $1.3 million improvement related in gross profit to our legacy subsidiaries located in our All Other reportable segment increased $1.8 million due to higher net sales coupled with an improvement in manufacturing efficiencies of $.1 million partially offset by an increase in material costs of $.6 million.

 

19


Table of Contents

Costs and expenses. Costs and expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $5.8 million, or 39%, compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, costs and expenses increased 34% as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Three month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     translation     change  
Costs and expenses
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 10,149     $ 7,753     $ 2,396     $     $ 2,396       31 %
Australia
    2,525       1,293       1,232       392       840       65  
Brazil
    1,604       1,217       387       216       171       14  
South Africa
    481       417       64       51       13       3  
Canada
    505       388       117       60       57       15  
Poland
    745       650       95       26       69       11  
All Other
    4,530       3,027       1,503       (9 )     1,512       50  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 20,539     $ 14,745     $ 5,794     $ 736     $ 5,058       34 %
 
                                   
PLP-USA costs and expenses increased $2.4 million due primarily to an increase in employee related costs of $.6 million, acquisition related costs of $.4 million, an unfavorable change in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies of $.3 million, a loss on foreign currency translations of $.6 million, consulting costs of $.2 million, commissions of $.1 million and repairs and maintenance of $.1 million. International costs and expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 were unfavorably impacted by $.7 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009. The following discussions of international costs and expenses exclude the effect of currency translation. Australia costs and expenses increased $.8 million primarily due to an increase in personnel related costs and the addition of new employees related to the December 2009 Dulmison acquisition coupled with higher consulting expenses. Brazil costs and expenses increase of $.2 million related to an increase in personnel related costs due to the addition of new employees and a new labor contract coupled with an increase in sales commissions, advertising expenses and lower bad debt expense in 2009 due to the collection on customer accounts previously considered questionable partially offset by lower research and engineering expenses. South Africa costs and expenses remained relatively unchanged compared to 2009. Canada and Poland costs and expenses both increased less than $.1 million primarily due to an increase in personnel related costs. All Other costs and expenses increased $1.5 million primarily due to a $.8 million loss on currency translation when converting balances from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars coupled with additional costs and expenses related to the locations acquired in December 2009 located in the All Other category. The costs and expenses of our legacy locations located in the All Other category remained relatively unchanged.
Other income. Other income for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 of $.4 million was $.2 million higher compared to 2009. Other income primarily increased $.5 million due to an unrealized gain recognized as a result of revaluing our forward foreign exchange contract to fair value at June 30, 2010. This forward foreign exchanged contract was entered into on June 7, 2010 to reduce our exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar, which closed on July 30, 2010. Also contributing to the increase in Other income was a $.1 million increase related to our natural gas well located at our corporate headquarters property in Mayfield Village, Ohio. Our increase in other income was offset by $.3 million due to an increase in non-operational expenses related to our foreign jurisdictions.
Income taxes. Income taxes for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 of $1.2 million were $.5 million lower than 2009. The effective tax rate for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was 16% compared to 33% in 2009. The effective tax rate for three month period ended June 30, 2010 is lower than the statutory federal rate of 34% primarily due to increased foreign earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax rates, a favorable tax incentive for technological innovation, and the decrease of unrecognized tax benefits primarily due to settlement of audits.

 

20


Table of Contents

Net income. As a result of the preceding items, net income for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was $6.1 million, compared to $3.5 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net income increased $2.3 million as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Three month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     translation     change  
Net income
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 1,834     $ 1,094     $ 740     $     $ 740       68 %
Australia
    560       62       498       69       429       692  
Brazil
    702       51       651       68       583       1,143  
South Africa
    642       304       338       71       267       88  
Canada
    489       616       (127 )     58       (185 )     (30 )
Poland
    424       123       301       24       277       225  
All Other
    1,445       1,292       153       (45 )     198       15  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 6,096     $ 3,542     $ 2,554     $ 245     $ 2,309       65 %
 
                                   
PLP-USA net income increased $.7 million as a result of an increase in other income of $.5 million coupled with a decrease in income taxes of $1.3 million partially offset by a decrease in operating income of $1 million. The following discussion of international net income excludes the effect of currency translation. Australia net income increased $.4 million due primarily to the increase in operating income of $.9 million partially offset by an increase in other income of $.3 million and an increase in income taxes. Brazil net income increased $.6 million primarily as a result of the increase in operating income of $.3 million coupled with a decrease in income taxes due to certain technological tax incentives received. South Africa net income increased $.3 million primarily as a result of the increase in operating income of $.4 million partially offset by an increase in income taxes. Canada net income decreased $.2 million primarily as a result of the decrease in operating income of $.3 million partially offset by a decrease in income taxes. Poland net income increased $.3 million as a result of a $.4 million increase in operating income partially offset by an increase in income taxes. All Other net income increased $.2 million primarily as a result of the $.8 million increase in operating income offset by an increase in income taxes.
SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s consolidated income statements for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009. The Company’s past operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
                                 
    Six month period ended June 30  
Thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     % Change  
Net sales
  $ 151,045     $ 118,262     $ 32,783       28 %
Cost of products sold
    103,565       79,834       23,731       30  
 
                       
Gross profit
    47,480       38,428       9,052       24  
 
                       
Gross profit as percentage of net sales
    31 %     32 %                
 
                               
Costs and expenses
    39,233       29,511       9,722       33  
Costs and expenses as percentage of net sales
    26 %     25 %                
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    8,247       8,917       (670 )     (8 )
 
                       
Other income
    641       653       (12 )     (2 )
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    8,888       9,570       (682 )     (7 )
Income before income taxes as percentage of net sales
    6 %     8 %                
 
                               
Income taxes
    1,758       3,311       (1,553 )     (47 )
 
                       
Net income
  $ 7,130     $ 6,259     $ 871       14 %
 
                       

 

21


Table of Contents

Net Sales. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, net sales were $151 million, an increase of $32.8 million, or 28%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net sales increased 19% as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Six month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     tranlation     change  
Net sales
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 57,147     $ 54,699     $ 2,448     $     $ 2,448       4 %
Australia
    24,178       11,942       12,236       4,828       7,408       62  
Brazil
    16,264       10,882       5,382       2,944       2,438       22  
South Africa
    5,780       4,147       1,633       1,007       626       15  
Canada
    5,614       5,555       59       782       (723 )     (13 )
Poland
    7,403       5,695       1,708       750       958       17  
All Other
    34,659       25,342       9,317       286       9,031       36  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 151,045     $ 118,262     $ 32,783     $ 10,597     $ 22,186       19 %
 
                                   
The increase in PLP-USA net sales of $2.5 million, or 4%, was primarily due to sales volume increases of $1.6 million, sales mix increases of $2.4 million primarily offset by lower average sales prices compared to 2009. International net sales for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 were favorably affected by $10.6 million when converted to U.S. dollars, as a result of the U.S. dollar compared to certain weaker foreign currencies. The following discussions of international net sales exclude the effect of currency translation. Australia net sales increased $7.4 million, or 62%, as a result of higher sales volume of which $6.6 million related to the Dulmison acquisition in December 2009 coupled with an increase in sales related to BlueSky Energy Ltd. Brazil net sales increased $2.4 million, or 22%, as a result of higher energy sales volume in their markets. South Africa net sales increased $.6 million, or 15%, primarily as a result of increased volume in energy sales. Canada net sales decreased $.7 million, or 13%, due to lower sales volume in their markets coupled with a one-time sales project which was recognized in the second quarter 2009. Poland net sales increased $1 million, or 17%, due primarily to an increase in sales volume in the second quarter 2010 in their domestic markets due to an improvement in Poland’s economy. All other net sales increased $9 million, or 36%, due to an increase in sales volume coupled with an estimated $4.8 million in net sales realized through the acquisition entered into in December 2009 reported in All Other.
Gross profit. Gross profit of $47.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $9.1 million, or 24%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, gross profit increased 14% as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Six month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     translation     change  
Gross profit
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 16,321     $ 18,128     $ (1,807 )   $     $ (1,807 )     (10 )%
Australia
    8,093       3,247       4,846       1,642       3,204       99  
Brazil
    4,453       2,739       1,714       789       925       34  
South Africa
    2,745       1,644       1,101       471       630       38  
Canada
    2,441       2,402       39       340       (301 )     (13 )
Poland
    2,214       1,741       473       211       262       15  
All Other
    11,213       8,527       2,686       128       2,558       30  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 47,480     $ 38,428     $ 9,052     $ 3,581     $ 5,471       14 %
 
                                   

 

22


Table of Contents

PLP-USA gross profit of $16.3 million decreased $1.8 million compared to 2009. PLP-USA gross profit decreased primarily due to higher material costs. International gross profit for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 were favorably impacted by $3.6 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009. The following discussion of international gross profit excludes the effect of currency translation. The Australia gross profit increase of $3.2 million was the result of $2 million from higher net sales coupled with lower manufacturing labor costs of $1.5 million, partially offset by an increase in material costs. Brazil’s gross profit increase of $.9 million was primarily the result of $.6 million from higher net sales coupled with an improvement in product margins. The South Africa gross profit increase of $.6 million was a result of $.2 million from higher sales volume coupled with an improvement in product margins. Canada’s gross profit decrease of $.3 million was due to a decrease in sales volume. Poland’s gross profit increase of $.3 million was a result of $.3 million from higher sales volume coupled an improvement in manufacturing efficiencies partially offset by a $.2 million increase in material costs. All Other gross profit improved $2.6 million compared to 2009. Approximately half of the improvement in gross profit related to our new locations acquired in December 2009 as part of the Dulmison acquisition. The rest of the improvement in All Other gross profit was due to higher sales volume related to our other operations that are included in All Other.
Costs and expenses. Cost and expenses for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $9 million, or 33%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, costs and expenses increased 26% as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Six month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     translation     change  
Costs and expenses
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 19,768     $ 16,385     $ 3,383     $     $ 3,383       21 %
Australia
    4,875       2,526       2,349       975       1,374       54  
Brazil
    3,228       2,453       775       611       164       7  
South Africa
    997       691       306       150       156       23  
Canada
    977       781       196       137       59       8  
Poland
    1,470       1,061       409       144       265       25  
All Other
    7,918       5,614       2,304       151       2,153       38  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 39,233     $ 29,511     $ 9,722     $ 2,168     $ 7,554       26 %
 
                                   
PLP-USA costs and expenses increased $3.4 million primarily due to an increase in employee related costs of $1.1 million, business acquisition/integration costs of $.9 million, a foreign currency translation loss of $.5 million, repairs and maintenance of $.3 million, travel expenses of $.1 million, consulting costs of $.1 million, and $.1 million due to less bad debt recoveries. International costs and expenses for the six month period ended June 20, 2010 were unfavorably impacted by $2.2 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009. The following discussions of international costs and expenses exclude the effect of currency translation. Australia costs and expenses increased $1.4 million primarily due to an increase in personnel related costs, the addition of new employees related to the December 2009 Dulmison acquisition and higher IT and consulting expenses. Brazil cost and expenses increased $.2 million primarily due to higher personnel related costs related to additional employees and a new labor contract coupled with an increase in advertising and travel expenses. South Africa cost and expenses increased $.2 million primarily due to higher personnel related costs and administrative expenses due to an increase in bad debt expense coupled with higher building maintenance costs. Canada cost and expenses increased less than $.1 million due to higher personnel related costs coupled with an increase in depreciation expense. Poland cost and expenses increased $.3 million primarily due to higher personnel related costs coupled with higher commission expense. The increase in All Other costs and expenses increased $2.2 million primarily due to the additional new employees from our new locations acquired in December 2009.

 

23


Table of Contents

Other income. Other income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 of $.8 million increased $.2 million compared to 2009. As previously noted, Other income increased primarily due to an unrealized gain recognized as a result of revaluing our forward foreign exchange contract to fair value. This forward foreign exchanged contract was entered into on June 7, 2010 to reduce our exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar, which closed on July 30, 2010. The increase in Other income was partially offset by an increase in interest expense at several of our foreign and domestic locations coupled with a $.3 million increase in non-operational expenses related to our foreign jurisdictions.
Income taxes. Income taxes for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 of $1.8 million was $1.5 million lower than the same period in 2009. The effective tax rate for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was 20% and 35% respectively. The effective tax rate for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 is lower than the statutory federal rate of 34% and the prior period’s rate of 35% primarily due to increased foreign earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax rates, a favorable tax incentive for technological innovation, and the decrease of unrecognized tax benefits primarily due to settlement of audits.
Net income. As a result of the preceding items, net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $7.1 million, compared to net income of $6.3 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net income increased $.3 million as summarized in the following table:
                                                 
    Six month period ended June 30  
                            Change     Change        
                            due to     excluding        
                            currency     currency     %  
thousands of dollars   2010     2009     Change     translation     translation     change  
Net income
                                               
PLP-USA
  $ 805     $ 2,250     $ (1,445 )   $     $ (1,445 )     (64 )%
Australia
    1,018       112       906       260       646       577  
Brazil
    1,167       145       1,022       126       896       618  
South Africa
    1,125       611       514       184       330       54  
Canada
    825       938       (113 )     114       (227 )     (24 )
Poland
    556       548       8       50       (42 )     (8 )
All Other
    1,634       1,655       (21 )     (135 )     114       7  
 
                                   
Consolidated
  $ 7,130     $ 6,259     $ 871     $ 599     $ 272       4 %
 
                                   
PLP-USA net income decreased $1.4 million as a result of a $4.4 million decrease in operating income partially offset by a decrease in income taxes of $2.6 million and an increase in other income. The following discussion of international net income excludes the effect of currency translation. Australia net income increased $.6 million due primarily to the increase in operating income of $1.3 million partially offset by increases in other income (expense) of $.3 million and income taxes of $.4 million. Brazil net income increased $.9 million primarily as a result of the increase in operating income of $.7 million coupled with a decrease in income taxes of $.2 million. South Africa net income increased $.3 million primarily as a result of the increase in operating income of $.5 million partially offset by an increase in income taxes. Canada net income decreased $.2 million primarily as a result of the decrease in operating income of $.3 million partially offset by a decrease in income taxes. Poland net income remained relatively unchanged compared to 2009. All Other net income increased $.1 million primarily as a result of the $.6 million increase in operating income partially offset by an increase in income taxes.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our critical accounting policies are consistent with the information set forth in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and are, therefore, not presented herein.

 

24


Table of Contents

WORKING CAPITAL, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash decreased $2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Net cash provided by operating activities was $6.7 million primarily because of net income, non-cash adjustments, and an increase in trade payables partially offset by an increase in accounts receivables, inventories, income taxes payable and all other current assets/liabilities. The major investing and financing uses of cash were $6.6 million in capital expenditures, $2.2 million in dividend payments and payment of long term debt of $11.5 million offset by cash proceeds of $.2 million related to the sale of property, plant and equipment and proceeds from debt borrowings of $11.9 million.
Net cash used in investing activities of $6.4 million represents an increase of $2.6 million when compared to the cash used by investing activities in the six month period ended June 30, 2009. During 2009, we received the remaining $.8 million from escrow related to the May 30, 2008 sale of the SMP operations and paid an earnout of $.4 million to the sellers of Direct Power and Water Company, originally purchased in March 2007. Capital expenditures increased $2.4 million in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 when compared to 2009 due mostly to our facilities expansion in Mexico, investment in solar panels at our Canadian operation and a software system implementation at our Spanish operation.
Cash used in financing activities of $1.6 million represents an increase of $1 million when compared to the cash used by financing activities in the six month period ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily a result of $.5 million in net debt borrowings in 2010 compared to $1.3 million in net debt borrowings in 2009.
Our current ratio was 2.9 to 1 at June 30, 2010 and 3 to 1 at December 31, 2009. At June 30, 2010, our unused balance under our main credit facility was $28.1 million and our bank debt to equity percentage was 5%. Our main revolving credit agreement contains, among other provisions, requirements for maintaining levels of working capital, net worth, and profitability. At June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with these covenants. We believe our future operating cash flows will be more than sufficient to cover debt repayments, other contractual obligations, capital expenditures and dividends. In addition, we believe our existing cash of $22.1 million, together with our untapped borrowing capacity, provides substantial financial resources. If we were to incur significant additional indebtedness, we expect to be able to meet liquidity needs under our credit facilities. We do not believe we would increase our debt to a level that would have a material adverse impact upon results of operations or financial condition.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB updated guidance included in FASB ASC 810-10, related to the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance will require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this updated guidance amends the quantitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810-10 amends certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and adds additional reconsideration events for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Further, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This updated guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period and interim reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to require disclosure of the transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a schedule for Level 3 that separately identifies purchases, sales, issuances and settlements and requires more detailed disclosures regarding valuation techniques and inputs. We adopted this new standard effective January 1, 2010 and it had no impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for sales arrangements that include multiple products or services by revising the criteria for when deliverables may be accounted for separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is necessary to separately account for each product or service. This hierarchy provides more options for establishing selling price than existing guidance. ASU 2009-13 is required to be applied prospectively to new or materially modified revenue arrangements in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2009-13 will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and related disclosures; however no effect is expected.

 

25


Table of Contents

ASU No. 2009-05 (ASC Topic 820), which amends Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Overall, ASU No. 2009-13 (ASC Topic 605), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, ASU No. 2009-14 (ASC Topic 985), Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements, and various other ASU’s No. 2009-2 through ASU No. 2010-19 which contain technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance to specialized industries or entities were recently issued. These updates have no current applicability to us or effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company operates manufacturing facilities and offices around the world and uses fixed and floating rate debt to finance the Company’s global operations. As a result, the Company is subject to business risks inherent in non-U.S. activities, including political and economic uncertainty, import and export limitations and market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company believes the political and economic risks related to the Company’s international operations are mitigated due to the stability of the countries in which the Company’s largest international operations are located.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a forward foreign currency contract with an exercise value of $12.9 million maturing July 28, 2010 at a forward rate of NZD $1.00=$.6632 USD. The Company entered into this forward foreign exchange contract to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar which closed on July 30, 2010. The Company does not hold derivatives for trading purposes.
The Company is exposed to market risk, including changes in interest rates. The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its variable rate revolving credit facilities and term notes, which consisted of borrowings of $8.1 million at June 30, 2010. A 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $.1 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
The Company’s primary currency rate exposures are related to foreign denominated debt, intercompany debt, forward exchange contracts, foreign denominated receivables and cash and short-term investments. A hypothetical 10% change in currency rates would have a favorable/unfavorable impact on fair values on such instruments of $3.5 million and on income before tax of $.1 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, were effective as of June 30, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

26


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On February 15, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase up to 200,000 shares of Preformed Line Products Company. The repurchase plan does not have an expiration date. The following table includes repurchases for the three month period ended June 30, 2010.
                                 
                    Total Number of        
    Total             Shares Purchased as     Maximum Number of  
    Number of     Average     Part of Publicly     Shares that may yet be  
    Shares     Price Paid     Announced Plans or     Purchased under the  
Period (2010)   Purchased     per Share     Programs     Plans or Programs  
 
April
                188,748       11,252  
May
                188,748       11,252  
June
                188,748       11,252  
 
                             
Total
                             
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
         
  31.1    
Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
 
  31.2    
Certifications of the Principal Financial Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished.

 

27


Table of Contents

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Cautionary Statement for “Safe harbor” Purposes Under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Form 10-Q and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) contain forward-looking statements regarding the Company’s and management’s beliefs and expectations. As a general matter, forward-looking statements are those focused upon future plans, objectives or performance (as opposed to historical items) and include statements of anticipated events or trends and expectations and beliefs relating to matters not historical in nature. Such forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to the Company’s operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Such uncertainties and factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements.
The following factors, among others, could affect the Company’s future performance and cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements made in this report:
   
The overall demand for cable anchoring and control hardware for electrical transmission and distribution lines on a worldwide basis, which has a slow growth rate in mature markets such as the United States (U.S.), Canada, and Western Europe;
   
The ability of our customers to raise funds needed to build the facilities their customers require;
   
Technological developments that affect longer-term trends for communication lines such as wireless communication;
   
The decreasing demands for product supporting copper-based infrastructure due to the introduction of products using new technologies or adoption of new industry standards;
   
The Company’s success at continuing to develop proprietary technology to meet or exceed new industry performance standards and individual customer expectations;
   
The Company’s success in strengthening and retaining relationships with the Company’s customers, growing sales at targeted accounts and expanding geographically;
   
The extent to which the Company is successful in expanding the Company’s product line into new areas;
   
The Company’s ability to identify, complete and integrate acquisitions for profitable growth;
   
The potential impact of consolidation, deregulation and bankruptcy among the Company’s suppliers, competitors and customers;
   
The relative degree of competitive and customer price pressure on the Company’s products;
   
The cost, availability and quality of raw materials required for the manufacture of products;

 

28


Table of Contents

   
The effects of fluctuation in currency exchange rates upon the Company’s reported results from international operations, together with non-currency risks of investing in and conducting significant operations in foreign countries, including those relating to political, social, economic and regulatory factors;
   
Changes in significant government regulations affecting environmental compliances;
   
The telecommunication market’s continued deployment of Fiber-to-the-Premises;
   
The Company’s ability to obtain funding for future acquisitions;
   
The potential impact of the depressed housing market on the Company’s ongoing profitability and future growth opportunities;
   
The continued support by Federal, State, Local and Foreign Governments in incentive programs for promoting renewable energy deployment;
   
Those factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” on page 13 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 15, 2010.

 

29


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
August 5, 2010  /s/ Robert G. Ruhlman    
  Robert G. Ruhlman   
  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 
     
August 5, 2010  /s/ Eric R. Graef    
  Eric R. Graef   
  Chief Financial Officer and Vice President — Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer) 
 

 

30


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
         
  31.1    
Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
 
  31.2    
Certifications of the Principal Financial Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished.

 

31