Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-8929
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-1369354 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 300, New York, |
|
|
New York
|
|
10176 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
212/297-0200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at May 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
52,038,568 shares |
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2010
Table of Contents
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,943 |
|
|
$ |
34,153 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances
of $10,184 and $10,772 at April 30, 2010 and
October 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
442,709 |
|
|
|
445,241 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
12,913 |
|
|
|
13,473 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
6,009 |
|
|
|
10,787 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
39,271 |
|
|
|
38,781 |
|
Notes receivable and other |
|
|
18,155 |
|
|
|
21,374 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
52,347 |
|
|
|
52,171 |
|
Insurance recoverables |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
597,245 |
|
|
|
620,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
Insurance deposits |
|
|
42,179 |
|
|
|
42,500 |
|
Other investments and long-term receivables |
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
57,815 |
|
|
|
63,444 |
|
Insurance recoverables |
|
|
65,819 |
|
|
|
67,100 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
31,749 |
|
|
|
32,446 |
|
Investments in auction rate securities |
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
19,531 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $99,592 and $92,563 at
April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
56,397 |
|
|
|
56,892 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated
amortization of $48,933 and $43,464 at
April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
54,731 |
|
|
|
60,199 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
547,880 |
|
|
|
547,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,481,909 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued) |
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
57,011 |
|
|
$ |
84,701 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
85,282 |
|
|
|
93,095 |
|
Taxes other than income |
|
|
14,134 |
|
|
|
17,539 |
|
Insurance claims |
|
|
78,803 |
|
|
|
78,144 |
|
Other |
|
|
73,400 |
|
|
|
66,279 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
311,732 |
|
|
|
342,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
25,327 |
|
|
|
17,763 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
172,500 |
|
Retirement plans and other |
|
|
31,644 |
|
|
|
32,963 |
|
Insurance claims |
|
|
266,572 |
|
|
|
268,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
780,275 |
|
|
|
834,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares
authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 52,018,718 and 51,688,218 shares issued
at April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
183,377 |
|
|
|
176,480 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
|
|
(1,832 |
) |
|
|
(2,423 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
519,569 |
|
|
|
512,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
701,634 |
|
|
|
687,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,481,909 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
855,461 |
|
|
$ |
855,711 |
|
|
$ |
1,725,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
771,974 |
|
|
|
766,148 |
|
|
|
1,554,075 |
|
|
|
1,553,416 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
65,244 |
|
|
|
64,265 |
|
|
|
128,046 |
|
|
|
135,652 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
839,912 |
|
|
|
833,093 |
|
|
|
1,687,590 |
|
|
|
1,694,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
22,618 |
|
|
|
37,755 |
|
|
|
48,612 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
14,245 |
|
|
|
21,305 |
|
|
|
35,236 |
|
|
|
45,631 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
8,256 |
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
17,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
8,623 |
|
|
|
13,049 |
|
|
|
21,459 |
|
|
|
27,804 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,577 |
|
|
$ |
12,777 |
|
|
$ |
21,352 |
|
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and
common equivalent shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
52,007 |
|
|
|
51,301 |
|
|
|
51,914 |
|
|
|
51,206 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
52,719 |
|
|
|
51,553 |
|
|
|
52,633 |
|
|
|
51,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.135 |
|
|
$ |
0.130 |
|
|
$ |
0.270 |
|
|
$ |
0.260 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (Note 1) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,352 |
|
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
21,459 |
|
|
|
27,804 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations
to net cash provided by continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
17,044 |
|
|
|
15,237 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
16,266 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
Provision for bad debt |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
Discount accretion on insurance claims |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
Auction rate security credit loss impairment |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(930 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
(2,932 |
) |
Insurance recoverables |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Other assets and long-term receivables |
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
(2,617 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
(7,306 |
) |
Retirement plans and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
(439 |
) |
Insurance claims payable |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
(2,607 |
) |
Trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(23,961 |
) |
|
|
(3,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
16,281 |
|
|
|
16,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
|
37,740 |
|
|
|
44,341 |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities |
|
|
6,583 |
|
|
|
22,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
44,323 |
|
|
|
67,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(12,238 |
) |
|
|
(9,680 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
2,312 |
|
Purchase of businesses |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(11,739 |
) |
|
|
(8,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock options (including income tax benefit) |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(14,014 |
) |
|
|
(13,314 |
) |
Borrowings from line of credit |
|
|
229,000 |
|
|
|
343,000 |
|
Repayment of borrowings from line of credit |
|
|
(256,500 |
) |
|
|
(391,000 |
) |
Changes in book cash overdrafts |
|
|
(7,325 |
) |
|
|
(5,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(45,794 |
) |
|
|
(65,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,210 |
) |
|
|
(6,676 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
34,153 |
|
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
20,943 |
|
|
$ |
20,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (Note 1) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (refunded) paid for income taxes, net of refunds received |
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
8,928 |
|
Tax effect from exercise of options |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
Cash received from exercise of options |
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
Interest paid on line of credit |
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for business acquired |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM,
and together with its subsidiaries, the Company) contained in this report are unaudited and
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in ABMs Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009. All references to years are to the Companys fiscal
year, which ends on October 31.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in ABMs condensed consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of
these financial statements. The current economic environment and its potential effect on the
Companys clients have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and
assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from
continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in
future periods. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements reflect all adjustments, which are normal and recurring, necessary to fairly state the
information for each period contained therein. The results of operations for the three and six
months ended April 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that might be
expected for the full fiscal year or any future periods.
Immaterial Correction
The presentation of the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six
months ended April 30, 2009, corrects the presentation of cash and cash equivalents and book cash
overdrafts related to offsetting of positive and negative book cash balances. The effects of the
correction, which had no impact on the Companys previously reported earnings for any periods, are
presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
As |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reported |
|
|
Corrected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(59,798 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,764 |
) |
2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Effective November 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
updated authoritative standard for accounting for business combinations, which is included in
Accounting Standards Codification TM (ASC) Topic 805 Business Combinations (ASC
805). Upon adoption, on November 1, 2009, the Company expensed approximately $1.0 million of
deferred acquisition costs for acquisitions currently being pursued. This authoritative standard
will impact the way in which the Company accounts for future business combinations.
Effective November 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB updated authoritative standard for
determining the useful life of intangible assets, which is included in ASC Topic 350-30 General
Intangibles Other than Goodwill (ASC 350-30). This authoritative standard amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset and requires additional disclosures. The disclosure
requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective
date. This authoritative standard had no impact on the Companys condensed consolidated interim
financial statements, but could impact the way in which the useful lives of intangible assets
acquired in a business combination will be determined for future acquisitions, if renewal or
extension terms are apparent.
8
Effective November 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB updated authoritative standard on
employers disclosures about post-retirement benefit plan assets, which is included in ASC Topic
715 CompensationRetirement Benefits (ASC 715). The authoritative standard expands the annual
disclosures by adding required disclosures about how investment allocation decisions are made by
management, major categories of plan assets and significant concentrations of risk. Additionally,
it is now required for an employer to disclose information about the valuation of plan assets
similar to that required under ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820).
This authoritative standard will not have an impact on the Companys condensed consolidated interim
financial statements as it only amends required annual disclosures.
Effective November 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB authoritative standard on fair value
measurements for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured on a non-recurring
basis, which is included in ASC 820. The Companys non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities principally consist of intangible assets acquired through business combinations and
long-lived assets. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the Company did not re-measure any
non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities at fair value, therefore, this authoritative
standard did not have an impact on the Companys condensed consolidated interim financial
statements. This authoritative standard will impact the way in which fair value is measured and
disclosed for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on
a non-recurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.
Effective February 1, 2010, the Company adopted FASB accounting standard update No. 2010-6,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, issued in January 2010 related to fair value
measurements and disclosures, except for the additional gross presentation disclosure requirements
for Level 3 changes which will be adopted in the first quarter of 2012. The update requires
entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements of assets
and liabilities, including (1) the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2
fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers, (2) the reasons for any transfers in or
out of Level 3, and (3) information on purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis
in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 fair value measurements. The FASB also clarified
existing fair value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation of assets and
liabilities, and information about the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2
and Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company did not have transfers of assets and liabilities
between Level 1, Level 2 and/or Level 3 and the required additional disclosures had no impact on
the Companys financial position or results of operations. See Note 3, Fair Value Measurements
and Note 4, Auction Rate Securities.
3. Fair Value Measurements
As required by ASC 820, fair value is determined based on inputs or assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. These assumptions consist of (1)
observable inputs market data obtained from independent sources, or (2) unobservable inputs -
market data determined using the companys own assumptions about valuation. ASC 820 establishes a
hierarchy to prioritize the inputs to valuation techniques, with the highest priority being given
to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs, as described below:
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived
valuations in which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in
active markets; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs.
9
The following tables presents the Companys hierarchy for financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
(in thousands) |
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in funded deferred compensation plan |
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investments in auction rate securities |
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
25,338 |
|
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
(in thousands) |
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in funded deferred compensation plan |
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment in auction rate securities |
|
|
19,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
25,537 |
|
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the assets held in the funded deferred compensation plan is based on quoted
market prices.
The fair value of the investments in auction rate securities is based on discounted cash flow
valuation models, primarily utilizing unobservable inputs. During the six months ended
April 30, 2010, the Company had no transfers of assets or liabilities between any of the above
hierarchy levels. See Note 4, Auction Rate Securities, for the roll-forwards of assets measured at fair
value using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs.
The fair value of the interest rate swap is estimated based on the present value of the difference
between expected cash flows calculated at the contracted interest rates and the expected cash flows
at current market interest rates using observable benchmarks for LIBOR forward rates at the end of
the period. See Note 7, Line of Credit Facility.
Other Financial Assets and Liabilities
Due to the short-term maturities of the Companys cash, cash equivalents, receivables, payables,
and current assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, the carrying value of these
financial instruments approximates their fair market values. Due to the variable interest rates,
the fair value of outstanding borrowings under the Companys $450.0 million line of credit
approximates its carrying value of $145.0 million. The carrying value of the receivables included
in non-current assets of discontinued operations of $2.8 million and the acquired insurance
deposits related to acquired self-insurance claims of $42.2 million approximates fair market value.
10
4. Auction Rate Securities
As of April 30, 2010, the Company held investments in auction rate securities from five different
issuers having an original principal amount of $5.0 million each (aggregating $25.0 million). At
April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of these securities, in total, was
approximately $19.6 million and $19.5 million, respectively. These auction rate securities are debt
instruments with stated maturities ranging from 2025 to 2050, for which the interest rate is
designed to be reset through Dutch auctions approximately every 30 days. Auctions for these
securities have not occurred since August 2007.
The Company estimates the fair values of auction rate securities it holds utilizing a discounted
cash flow model, which considers, among other factors, assumptions about: (1) the underlying
collateral; (2) credit risks associated with the issuer; (3) contractual maturity; (4) credit
enhancements associated with financial insurance guarantees, if any; and (5) assumptions about
when, if ever, the security might be re-financed by the issuer or have a successful auction. Since
there can be no assurance that auctions for these securities will be successful in the near future,
the Company has classified its auction rate securities as long-term investments.
The following table presents the significant assumptions used to determine the fair value of the
Companys auction rate securities at April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption |
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
October 31, 2009 |
Discount rates
|
|
L + 0.34% - L + 22.17%
|
|
L + 0.34% - L + 24.43% |
Yields
|
|
L + 2.0% - L + 3.5%
|
|
L + 2.0% - L + 3.5% |
Average expected lives
|
|
4 - 10 years
|
|
4 - 8 years |
|
|
|
|
|
L London Interbank Offered Rate |
|
|
|
|
The Companys determination of whether impairments of its auction rate securities are
other-than-temporary is based on an evaluation of several factors, circumstances and known or
reasonably supportable trends including, but not limited to: (1) the Companys intent to not sell
the securities; (2) the Companys assessment that it is not more likely than not that the Company
will be required to sell the securities before recovering its cost basis; (3) expected defaults;
(4) available ratings for the securities or the underlying collateral; (5) the rating of the
associated guarantor (where applicable); (6) the nature and value of the underlying collateral
expected to service the investment; (7) actual historical performance of the security in servicing
its obligations; and (8) actuarial experience of the underlying re-insurance arrangement (where
applicable) which in certain circumstances may have preferential rights to the underlying
collateral.
Based primarily on an unfavorable development in the Companys assumption about the expected life
for one security, for the three months ended at April 30, 2010, the Company recognized an
additional other-than-temporary impairment credit loss of $0.1 million. The Company had previously
recognized an other-than-temporary impairment credit loss of $1.6 million for this security in
2009. The credit loss was based upon the difference between the present value of the expected cash
flows to be collected and the amortized cost basis of the security. Significant assumptions used in
estimating the credit loss include: (1) default rates for the security and the mono-line insurer,
if any (which were based on published historical default rates of similar securities and
consideration of current market trends) and (2) the expected life of the security (which represents
the Companys view of when market efficiencies for securities may be restored). Adverse changes in
any of these factors could result in additional declines in fair value and further
other-than-temporary impairments in the future.
The following tables presents the changes in the cost basis and fair value of the Companys auction
rate securities for the six months ended April 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
23,434 |
|
|
$ |
19,531 |
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
Unrealized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
Other-than-temporary credit loss recognized in earnings |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
23,307 |
|
|
$ |
19,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) related to credit losses recognized in earnings for
the six months ended April 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of the |
|
|
|
OTTI credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for |
|
|
amount related to |
|
|
|
recognized for the |
|
|
Additions for |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
increases in |
|
|
credit losses held at |
|
|
|
auction rate security |
|
|
the amount |
|
|
increases to the |
|
|
cash flows |
|
|
the end of the period |
|
|
|
held at the beginning of |
|
|
related to credit |
|
|
amount related |
|
|
expected to be |
|
|
for which a portion of |
|
|
|
the period for which a |
|
|
loss for which |
|
|
to credit loss for |
|
|
collected that are |
|
|
OTTI was recognized |
|
|
|
portion of OTTI was |
|
|
OTTI was not |
|
|
which an OTTI |
|
|
recognized over |
|
|
in Other |
|
|
|
recognized in Other |
|
|
previously |
|
|
was previously |
|
|
the remaining life |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
of the security |
|
|
Income |
|
OTTI credit loss recognized
for auction rate security |
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
At April 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, unrealized losses of $3.7 million ($2.2 million net of tax)
and $3.9 million ($2.3 million net of tax) were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss,
respectively.
5. Net Income per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the period, adjusted to include the assumed exercise and
conversion of certain stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares. The calculation
of basic and diluted net income per common share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
8,623 |
|
|
$ |
13,049 |
|
|
$ |
21,459 |
|
|
$ |
27,804 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,577 |
|
|
$ |
12,777 |
|
|
$ |
21,352 |
|
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding Basic |
|
|
52,007 |
|
|
|
51,301 |
|
|
|
51,914 |
|
|
|
51,206 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Performance shares |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding Diluted |
|
|
52,719 |
|
|
|
51,553 |
|
|
|
52,633 |
|
|
|
51,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
12
The diluted net income per common share excludes certain stock options and restricted stock units
since the effect of including these stock options and restricted stock units would have been
anti-dilutive as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
2,777 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
6. Self-Insurance
The Company provided for self-insurance expense during the six months ended April 30, 2010 using
actuarial rates established from its most recent actuarial review, which used claims data from
2009, considering known or expected trends. Actuarial evaluations are expected to be performed
during the third and fourth quarters of 2010 using claims data as of April 2010 and July 2010,
respectively.
At April 30, 2010, the Company had $101.0 million in standby letters of credit (primarily related
to its workers compensation, general liability, automobile, and property damage programs), $42.2
million in restricted insurance deposits and $110.2 million in surety bonds supporting insurance
claim liabilities. At October 31, 2009, the Company had $118.6 million in stand by letters of
credit, $42.5 million in restricted insurance deposits and $103.2 million in surety bonds
supporting insurance claim liabilities.
7. Line of Credit Facility
The Company holds a $450.0 million five-year syndicated line of credit that is scheduled to expire
on November 14, 2012 (the Facility). The Facility is available for working capital, the issuance
of standby letters of credit, the financing of capital expenditures, and other general corporate
purposes.
The Facility includes covenants limiting liens, dispositions, fundamental changes, investments,
indebtedness and certain transactions and payments. In addition, the Facility also requires that
the Company maintain the following three financial covenants which are described in Note 9, Line
of Credit Facility, to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for 2009: (1) a fixed charge coverage ratio; (2) a leverage ratio; and (3) a
combined net worth test. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of April 30, 2010 and
expects to be in compliance in the foreseeable future.
As of April 30, 2010, the total outstanding amount under the Facility in the form of cash
borrowings was $145.0 million. Available credit under the line of credit was $204.0 million at
April 30, 2010. The Companys ability to draw down available amounts under its line of credit is
subject to compliance with the covenants described above.
As of April 30, 2010, the fair value of the interest rate swap was a $0.8 million liability, which
is included in retirement plans and other on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
No ineffectiveness existed at April 30, 2010. The amount included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss is $0.8 million ($0.5 million, net of taxes).
13
8. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the Companys defined benefit plans and the
post-retirement benefit plans, including participants associated with continuing operations, for
the three and six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Defined Benefit Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Interest |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
Expected loss on plan assets |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement Benefit Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Amortization of actuarial gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Contingencies
The Company has been named as a defendant in certain proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Litigation outcomes are often difficult to predict and often are resolved over long
periods of time. Estimating probable losses requires the analysis of multiple possible outcomes
that often depend on judgments about potential actions by third parties. Loss contingencies are
recorded as liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements when it is
both: (1) probable or known that a liability has been incurred and (2) the amount of the loss is
reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and no amount within the
range is a better estimate, the minimum amount of the range is recorded as a liability. Legal costs
associated with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
The Company accrues amounts it believes are adequate to cover any liabilities related to litigation
and arbitration proceedings, and other contingencies that the Company believes will result in a
probable loss. However, the ultimate resolution of such matters is always uncertain. It is possible
that any such proceedings brought against the Company could
have a material adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations. The total
amount accrued for probable losses at April 30, 2010 was $9.2 million.
The Company is a defendant in several purported class action lawsuits related to alleged violations
of federal or California wage-and-hour laws. The named plaintiffs in these lawsuits are current or
former employees of ABM subsidiaries who allege, among other things, that they were required to
work off the clock, were not paid for all overtime, were not provided work breaks or other
benefits, and/or that they received pay stubs not conforming to California law. In all cases, the
plaintiffs generally seek unspecified monetary damages, injunctive relief or both.
The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit filed July 19, 2007 in the United States District Court,
Eastern District of California, entitled U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff
Erika Morales and Anonymous Plaintiffs One through Eight v. ABM Industries Incorporated et. al.
(the Morales case). The plaintiffs in the Morales case allege sexual harassment, discrimination
and retaliation. In 2009, fourteen claimants joined the lawsuit alleging various claims against the
Company. The case involves both Title VII federal law claims and California state law claims.
Title VII damages are limited to $300,000 per claimant; California state law claims do not contain
such limitations and can include punitive damages as well. The Company has several motions pending
relating to this matter. Since the Company believes that the allegations asserted by the claimants
who joined the Morales case in 2009 are not related to those underlying the originally filed
lawsuit, the Company has moved to separate these claims into two lawsuits. This motion was heard on
May 28, 2010. The court has not ruled on this motion to date. In addition, motions to dismiss many
of the claims on procedural and substantive grounds are scheduled to be heard by the court on June
17, 2010. The Morales case is currently scheduled for trial in August 2010. The Company intends to
continue to vigorously defend itself. The Company has accrued its best estimate of the probable
liability. There can be no assurance that any judgment or settlement relating to the Morales case
will not be material to the Company.
14
10. Share-Based Compensation Plans
On January 11, 2010, the Companys Compensation Committee approved the grant of 256,637 performance
share awards under the terms of the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
The fair value of the performance share awards granted and valued as of January 28, 2010 was
approximately $5.0 million and these awards vest over a period of three years.
On March 31, 2010 the Companys Compensation Committee approved the following grants: 262,344 stock
options and 80,185 restricted stock units, each under the terms of the Companys 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. The fair value of the awards granted on March 31, 2010 was
approximately $3.4 million and these awards vest 100% on the fifth anniversary of the grant date.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. The fair value of stock options granted was $6.41 per share. The
assumptions used in the option valuation model for the stock options granted on March 31, 2010
were: (1) expected life from date of grant of 5.6 years; (2) expected stock price volatility of
38.52%; (3) expected dividend yield of 2.66% and (4) a risk-free interest rate of 2.62%. The fair
value of the restricted stock units granted was determined using the closing stock price on the
date of grant.
11. Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income, net of taxes for the three
months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,577 |
|
|
$ |
12,777 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on auction rate
securities, net of taxes of $7 and $244 for April 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
377 |
|
Reclass adjustment for credit losses
recognized in earnings, net of taxes of $51 for April
30, 2010 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap agreement,
net of taxes of $106 and $302 for April 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes of $197
and $92 for April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Actuarial gain (loss) adjustments to pension & other
post-retirement plans, net of taxes of $7 and $8 for
April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
9,097 |
|
|
$ |
12,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income, net of taxes for the six
months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,352 |
|
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on auction rate
securities, net of taxes of $42 and $189 for April 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Reclass adjustment for credit losses
recognized in earnings, net of taxes of $51 for April
30, 2010 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap agreement,
net of taxes of $86 and $302 for April 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
Foreign currency translation, net of taxes of $211
and $44 for April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Actuarial gain (loss) adjustments to pension & other
post-retirement plans, net of taxes of $14 and $17 for
April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
21,943 |
|
|
$ |
26,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Income Taxes
At April 30, 2010, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $102.5 million, all of which, if
recognized in the future, would affect its effective tax rate. The Company includes interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of April 30, 2010, the
Company had accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions of $0.8 million. The Company has
recorded $2.1 million of the unrecognized tax benefits as a current liability.
The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations for the three months ended April 30,
2010 and 2009 were 39.5% and 38.8%, respectively. The effective tax rate on income from continuing
operations for the six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 was 39.1%.
The Companys major tax jurisdiction is the United States. ABM and OneSource Services, Inc. U.S.
federal income tax returns remain open for examination for the periods ending October 31, 2006
through October 31, 2009 and March 31, 2000 through November 14, 2007, respectively. ABM has been
notified by the Internal Revenue Service that tax years 2006-2008 will be examined beginning in the
third quarter of 2010. The Company does business in all 50 states, significantly in California,
Texas and New York, as well as Puerto Rico and Canada. In major state jurisdictions, the tax years
2005-2009 remain open and subject to examination by the appropriate tax authorities. The Company is
currently being examined by Illinois, Minnesota, Arizona, Utah, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and
Puerto Rico. The Company does not believe that the examinations by the Internal Revenue Service or
the state tax authorities will have a significant impact on its results of operations.
16
13. Segment Information
The Company is organized into four reportable operating segments, Janitorial, Parking, Security and
Engineering, which are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
574,046 |
|
|
$ |
589,344 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,764 |
|
Parking |
|
|
114,003 |
|
|
|
113,347 |
|
|
|
226,591 |
|
|
|
229,016 |
|
Security |
|
|
80,712 |
|
|
|
82,403 |
|
|
|
164,309 |
|
|
|
167,986 |
|
Engineering |
|
|
86,190 |
|
|
|
70,194 |
|
|
|
175,541 |
|
|
|
147,410 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
855,461 |
|
|
$ |
855,711 |
|
|
$ |
1,725,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
29,025 |
|
|
$ |
34,894 |
|
|
$ |
63,109 |
|
|
$ |
67,205 |
|
Parking |
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
10,210 |
|
|
|
9,001 |
|
Security |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
Engineering |
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
|
4,038 |
|
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
8,704 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(24,457 |
) |
|
|
(22,570 |
) |
|
|
(47,699 |
) |
|
|
(39,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
22,618 |
|
|
|
37,755 |
|
|
|
48,612 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
14,245 |
|
|
$ |
21,305 |
|
|
$ |
35,236 |
|
|
$ |
45,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Corporate expenses are not allocated. Such expenses include the adjustments to the Companys
self-insurance reserves relating to prior years, certain legal costs and settlements, certain
information technology costs, share-based compensation costs, severance costs associated with
acquisitions and certain chief executive officer, and other finance and human resource departmental
costs. Corporate expenses for the six months ended April 30, 2009 included the net benefit of a
$9.6 million legal settlement related to a claim that was settled and resolved in the three months
ended January 31, 2009.
14. Discontinued Operations
On October 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of its
former Lighting segment, excluding accounts receivable and certain other assets and liabilities, to
Sylvania Lighting Services Corp (Sylvania). The remaining assets and liabilities associated with
the Lighting segment have been classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations for
all periods presented. The results of operations of the Lighting segment for all periods presented
are classified as Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes.
17
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of the Lighting segment
included in discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
Notes receivable and other |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
Other receivables due from Sylvania (a) |
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
6,009 |
|
|
|
10,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes receivable |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
Other receivables due from Sylvania (a) |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Due to Sylvania, net (b) |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,270 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In connection with the sale of the Lighting segment, Sylvania acquired certain
contracts containing deferred charges. Payments received by Sylvania from clients with
respect to the deferred charges for these contracts are paid to the Company. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents net amounts collected on Sylvanias behalf pursuant to a transition services
agreement, which was entered into in connection with the sale of the Lighting segment. |
15. Parking Revenue Presentation
The Companys Parking segment reports both revenues and expenses, in equal amounts, for costs
directly reimbursed from its managed parking lot clients. Parking revenues related solely to the
reimbursement of expenses totaled $57.2 million and $57.3 million for the three months ended April
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $113.2 million and $117.8 million for the six months ended
April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements of ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM, and together with its
subsidiaries, the Company) included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009. All information in the discussion and references
to years are based on the Companys fiscal year, which ends on October 31.
Overview
The Company provides janitorial, parking, security and engineering services for thousands of
commercial, industrial, institutional and retail client facilities in hundreds of cities, primarily
throughout the United States. The Companys business is impacted by, among other things, commercial
office building occupancy and rental rates, industrial activity, air travel levels, tourism and
transportation needs at colleges, universities and health care service facilities. Revenues at the
Companys Janitorial, Security and Engineering segments are primarily based on the performance of
labor-intensive services at contractually specified prices. Revenues at the Parking segment relate
to parking and transportation services, which are less labor-intensive. In addition to services
defined within the scope of client contracts, the Janitorial segment also generates revenues from
extra services (or tags) such as, but not limited to, flood cleanup services and snow removal,
which generally provide higher margins.
During 2009, the Company experienced losses of client contracts that exceeded new business,
reductions in the level and scope of client services, contract price compression and declines in
the level of tag work, primarily in the Janitorial segment. These losses and reductions continued
to influence results in the six months ended April 30, 2010. Total revenues in the six months ended
April 30, 2010, as compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009, decreased $17.8 million, or
1.0%, primarily related to the losses and reductions experienced during 2009 and some reductions in
the level and scope of client services and contract price compression in the six months ended April
30, 2010 in the Janitorial segment, partially offset by additional revenues from new clients and
the expansion of services to existing clients in the Engineering segment. The Companys operating
profit, excluding Corporate, decreased $2.6 million, or 3.0%, in the six months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009, primarily related to an increase in labor
expenses resulting from one additional working day in the six months ended April 30, 2010 and
increases in payroll related costs due to increases in state unemployment insurance rates that went
into effect on January 1, 2010, which were partially offset by cost control measures. The second
half of 2010 will benefit from one less working day, as compared to the second half of 2009.
In addition to revenues and operating profit, the Companys management views operating cash flows
as a good indicator of financial performance, as strong operating cash flows provide opportunities
for growth both organically and through acquisitions. Operating cash flows primarily depend on
revenue levels, the timing of collections and payments to suppliers and other vendors, the quality
of receivables, and the timing and amount of self-insured claims. The Companys cash flows provided
by continuing operating activities was $37.7 million for the six months ended April 30, 2010.
The Company believes that achieving desired levels of revenues and profitability in the future will
depend upon, among other things, its ability to attract and retain clients at desirable profit
margins, to pass on cost increases to clients, and to keep overall costs low. In the short term,
the Company plans to remain competitive by, among other things, continued cost control strategies.
The Company is continuing to monitor, and in some cases exit, client arrangements where the Company
believes the client is at high risk of bankruptcy or which produce low profit margins and focus on
client arrangements that may generate less revenues but produce higher profit margins.
Additionally, the Company is exploring acquisitions, both domestically and internationally. In the
long-term, the Company expects to continue to grow organically and through acquisitions (including
international expansion) in response to the perceived growing demand for a global integrated
facility services solution provider.
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,943 |
|
|
$ |
34,153 |
|
|
$ |
(13,210 |
) |
Working capital |
|
$ |
285,513 |
|
|
$ |
278,303 |
|
|
$ |
7,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
44,323 |
|
|
$ |
67,202 |
|
|
$ |
(22,879 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(11,739 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,114 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,625 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(45,794 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,764 |
) |
|
$ |
19,970 |
|
As of April 30, 2010, the Companys cash and cash equivalents balance was $20.9 million, compared
to $34.2 million as of October 31, 2009. The decrease in cash is principally due to the timing of
net borrowings under the Companys line of credit, payments made on vendor invoices and collections
of accounts receivable.
The Company believes that the cash generated from operations and amounts available under its $450.0
million line of credit will be sufficient to meet the Companys cash requirements for the
long-term, except to the extent cash is required for significant acquisitions, if any. As of April
30, 2010, the total outstanding amounts under the Companys line of credit in the form of cash
borrowings and standby letters of credit were $145.0 million and $101.0 million, respectively.
Available credit under the line of credit was $204.0 million as of April 30, 2010. The Companys
ability to draw down available amounts under its $450.0 million line of credit is subject to
compliance with certain financial covenants, including covenants relating to consolidated net
worth, a fixed charge coverage ratio and a leverage ratio. In addition, other covenants under the
line of credit include limitations on liens, dispositions, fundamental changes, investments and
certain transactions and payments. As of April 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants and expects to be in the foreseeable future.
Working Capital. Working capital increased by $7.2 million to $285.5 million at April 30, 2010 from
$278.3 million at October 31, 2009. Excluding the effects of discontinued operations, working
capital increased by $12.2 million to $280.8 million at April 30, 2010 from $268.6 million at
October 31, 2009.
The increase was primarily related to:
|
|
|
a $35.5 million decrease in trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities, primarily
related to the timing of payments made on vendor invoices; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $13.2 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents; |
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase for a litigation contingency recorded in other accrued
liabilities; |
|
|
|
a $3.2 million decrease in notes receivable and other, primarily related to collections
received during the six months ended April 30, 2010; and |
|
|
|
a $2.5 million decrease in trade accounts receivable, net, primarily related to the
timing of collections received from clients. |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $44.3 million
for the six months ended April 30, 2010, compared to $67.2 million for the six months ended April
30, 2009.
The decrease in cash flows from operating activities was primarily related to:
|
|
|
a $24.6 million
period-over-period decrease in trade accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, primarily related to the timing of payments made on vendor invoices; and |
|
|
|
a $16.3 million decrease in net cash provided by discontinued operating activities; |
20
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $15.1 million period-over-period increase in income taxes payable, primarily related to
the timing of income tax payments and the utilization of deferred tax assets, including
OneSource Services, Inc. deferred tax assets; and |
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase for a litigation contingency recorded in other accrued
liabilities. |
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities was $6.6 million for the six months ended
April 30, 2010, compared to $22.9 million for the six months ended April 30, 2009. The cash
provided by discontinued operating activities for the six months ended April 30, 2010 primarily
related to cash collections from the transferred client contracts that contained deferred charges
related to services performed by the Company prior to the sale.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months
ended April 30, 2010 was $11.7 million, compared to $8.1 million for the six months ended April 30,
2009. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily related to an increase in
capital expenditure purchases of $2.6 million during the six months ended April 30, 2010.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was $45.8 million for
the six months ended April 30, 2010, compared to $65.8 million for the six months ended April 30,
2009. The decrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily related to a $20.5 million
period-over-period decrease in net repayments from the Companys line of credit.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 vs. Three Months Ended April 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
855,461 |
|
|
$ |
855,711 |
|
|
$ |
(250 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
771,974 |
|
|
|
766,148 |
|
|
|
5,826 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
65,244 |
|
|
|
64,265 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
839,912 |
|
|
|
833,093 |
|
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
22,618 |
|
|
|
(7,069 |
) |
|
|
(31.3 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
14,245 |
|
|
|
21,305 |
|
|
|
(7,060 |
) |
|
|
(33.1 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
8,256 |
|
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
8,623 |
|
|
|
13,049 |
|
|
|
(4,426 |
) |
|
|
(33.9 |
)% |
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
NM |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,577 |
|
|
$ |
12,777 |
|
|
$ |
(4,200 |
) |
|
|
(32.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income. Net income in the three months ended April 30, 2010 decreased by $4.2 million, or
32.9%, to $8.6 million ($0.16 per diluted share) from $12.8 million ($0.25 per diluted share) in
the three months ended April 30, 2009.
21
Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations in the three months ended
April 30, 2010 decreased by $4.4 million, or 33.9%, to $8.6 million ($0.16 per diluted share) from
$13.0 million ($0.25 per diluted share) in the three months ended April 30, 2009.
The decrease in income from continuing operations was primarily related to:
|
|
|
a $5.2 million decrease in operating profit, excluding the Corporate segment, primarily
related to an increase in labor expenses resulting from one additional working day in the
three months ended April 30, 2010 and increases in payroll related costs from increases in
state unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010; and |
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase in a litigation contingency; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $2.8 million year-over-year decrease in information technology costs, net of higher
depreciation costs, primarily related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and
accounting systems in 2009; and |
|
|
|
a $2.6 million decrease in income taxes, primarily related to the decrease in income
from continuing operations before income taxes. |
Revenues. Total revenues in the three months ended April 30, 2010 remained relatively flat, as compared
to the three months ended April 30, 2009.
Operating Expenses. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin was 9.8% and 10.5% in the three
months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage was
primarily related to an increase in labor expenses resulting from one additional working day in the
three months ended April 30, 2010 and increases in payroll related costs from increases in state
unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010.
Selling General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$1.0 million, or 1.5%, in the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended
April 30, 2009.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily related to:
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase in a litigation contingency; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $2.8 million year-over-year decrease in information technology costs, net of higher
depreciation costs, primarily related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and
accounting systems in 2009; and |
|
|
|
a $1.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs at the Janitorial
segment, primarily related to cost control measures. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense in the three months ended April 30, 2010 decreased $0.1 million,
or 10.4%, to $1.2 million from $1.3 million in the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease
was primarily related to a lower average outstanding balance and a lower average interest rate
under the line of credit in the three months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the three months
ended April 30, 2009. The average outstanding balance under the Companys line of credit was $164.9
million and $217.0 million during the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
22
Segment Information. The revenues and operating profits for the Companys reportable segments
(Janitorial, Parking, Security, and Engineering) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
574,046 |
|
|
$ |
589,344 |
|
|
$ |
(15,298 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
Parking |
|
|
114,003 |
|
|
|
113,347 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Security |
|
|
80,712 |
|
|
|
82,403 |
|
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Engineering |
|
|
86,190 |
|
|
|
70,194 |
|
|
|
15,996 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
855,461 |
|
|
$ |
855,711 |
|
|
$ |
(250 |
) |
|
NM |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
29,025 |
|
|
$ |
34,894 |
|
|
$ |
(5,869 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
)% |
Parking |
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Security |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(32.6 |
)% |
Engineering |
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
|
4,038 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(24,457 |
) |
|
|
(22,570 |
) |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
22,618 |
|
|
|
(7,069 |
) |
|
|
(31.3 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
14,245 |
|
|
$ |
21,305 |
|
|
$ |
(7,060 |
) |
|
|
(33.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial. Janitorial revenues decreased $15.3 million, or 2.6%, during the three months ended
April 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. During 2009, Janitorial
experienced losses of client contracts that exceeded new business, reductions in the level and
scope of client services, contract price compression and declines in the level of tag work, which
continued to influence results in the three months ended April 30, 2010. In addition, during the six months ended April 30, 2010, Janitorial continued to experience some reductions
in the level and scope of client services and contract price compression as a result of decreases
in client discretionary spending.
Operating profit decreased $5.9 million, or 16.8%, during the three months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily related to the reduction in revenues, an
increase in labor expenses resulting from one additional working day in the three months ended
April 30, 2010 and increases in payroll related costs from increases in state unemployment
insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010, partially offset by cost control
measures.
Parking. Parking revenues increased $0.7 million, or 0.6%, during the three months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. The increase was primarily related to
additional revenues from new clients and the expansion of services to existing clients.
Operating profit increased $0.3 million, or 6.7%, during the three months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. The increase was primarily related to cost
control measures and the increase in revenues.
23
Security. Security revenues decreased $1.7 million, or 2.1%, during the three months ended April
30, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease in revenues was primarily
related to reductions in the level and scope of client services and contract price compression as a
result of decreases in client discretionary spending, partially offset by additional revenues from
new clients in the three months ended April 30, 2010.
Operating profit decreased $0.5 million, or 32.6%, in the three months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily related to the
decrease in revenues, principally those with high gross profit margins, and increases in payroll related costs from increases in state unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010.
Engineering. Engineering revenues increased $16.0 million, or 22.8%, during the three months ended
April 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009. The increase was primarily
related to additional revenues from new clients and the expansion of services to existing clients.
Operating profit increased by $0.8 million, or 20.3%, in the three months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009, primarily related to the increase in revenues.
Corporate. Corporate expense increased $1.9 million, or 8.4%, in the three months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2009.
The increase in Corporate expense was primarily related to:
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase in a litigation contingency; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $2.8 million year-over-year decrease in information technology costs, net of higher
depreciation costs, primarily related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and
accounting systems in 2009. |
24
Results of Operations
Six Months Ended April 30, 2010 vs. Six Months Ended April 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,725,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,183 |
|
|
$ |
(17,838 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
1,554,075 |
|
|
|
1,553,416 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
128,046 |
|
|
|
135,652 |
|
|
|
(7,606 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
1,687,590 |
|
|
|
1,694,571 |
|
|
|
(6,981 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
37,755 |
|
|
|
48,612 |
|
|
|
(10,857 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
35,236 |
|
|
|
45,631 |
|
|
|
(10,395 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
13,777 |
|
|
|
17,827 |
|
|
|
(4,050 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
21,459 |
|
|
|
27,804 |
|
|
|
(6,345 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
703 |
|
|
NM |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,352 |
|
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
$ |
(5,642 |
) |
|
|
(20.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income. Net income in the six months ended April 30, 2010 decreased by $5.6 million, or 20.9%,
to $21.4 million ($0.41 per diluted share) from $27.0 million ($0.52 per diluted share) in the six
months ended April 30, 2009. Net income included a loss of $0.1 million and $0.8 million from
discontinued operations in the six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Income from Continuing Operations. Income from continuing operations in the six months ended April
30, 2010 decreased by $6.3 million, or 22.8%, to $21.5 million ($0.41 per diluted share) from $27.8
million ($0.54 per diluted share) in the six months ended April 30, 2009.
The decrease in income from continuing operations was primarily related to:
|
|
|
the absence of a $9.6 million net gain related to a legal settlement for a claim that
was settled and resolved in the three months ended January 31, 2009; |
|
|
|
a $2.6 million decrease in operating profit, excluding the Corporate segment, primarily
related to an increase in labor expenses resulting from one additional working day in the
six months ended April 30, 2010 and increases in payroll related costs from increases in
state unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010; |
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase in a litigation contingency; and |
|
|
|
deferred acquisition costs of $1.0 million, expensed in the six months ended April 30,
2010, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification TM Topic 805
Business Combinations (ASC 805); |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $6.1 million year-over-year decrease in information technology costs, net of higher
depreciation costs, primarily related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and
accounting systems in 2009; |
|
|
|
a $4.1 million decrease in income taxes, primarily related to the decrease in income
from continuing operations before income taxes; and |
|
|
|
a $0.6 million decrease in interest expense as a result of a lower average outstanding
balance and lower average interest rate under the line of credit. |
25
Revenues. Total revenues in the six months ended April 30, 2010 decreased $17.8 million, or 1.0%, to
$1,725.3 million from $1,743.2 million in the six months ended April 30, 2009. During 2009, the
Company experienced losses of client contracts that exceeded new business, reductions in the level
and scope of client services, contract price compression and declines in the level of tag work,
primarily in the Janitorial segment. These losses and reductions continued to influence results in
the six months ended April 30, 2010. In addition, the Janitorial segment experienced some reductions
in the level and scope of client services and contract price compression in the six months ended
April 30, 2010. These revenue decreases in the Janitorial segment were partially offset by
additional revenues from new clients and the expansion of services to existing clients in the
Engineering segment. Additionally, approximately $4.6 million, or 25.8%, of the decrease in
revenues was due to the reduction of expenses incurred on the behalf of managed parking facilities,
which are reimbursed to the Company. These reimbursed expenses are recognized as parking revenues
and expenses, which have no impact on operating profit.
Operating Expenses. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin was 9.9% and 10.9% in the six months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily
related to a $9.6 million net gain related to a legal settlement for a claim that was settled and
resolved in the three months ended January 31, 2009, an increase in labor expenses resulting from
one additional working day in the six months ended April 30, 2010 and increases in payroll related
costs from increases in state unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1,
2010.
Selling General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$7.6 million, or 5.6%, in the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended
April 30, 2009.
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily related to:
|
|
|
a $6.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs at the Janitorial
segment, primarily related to cost control measures; and |
|
|
|
a $6.1 million year-over-year decrease in information technology costs, net of higher
depreciation costs, primarily related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and
accounting systems in 2009; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase in a litigation contingency; and |
|
|
|
deferred acquisition costs of $1.0 million, expensed in the six months ended April 30,
2010, due to the adoption of ASC 805. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense in the six months ended April 30, 2010 decreased $0.6 million,
or 19.8%, to $2.4 million from $3.0 million in the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease
was primarily related to a lower average outstanding balance and a lower average interest rate
under the line of credit in the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended
April 30, 2009. The average outstanding balance under the Companys line of credit was $167.2
million and $227.0 million during the six months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
26
Segment Information. The revenues and operating profits for the Companys reportable segments
(Janitorial, Parking, Security, and Engineering) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
April 30, 2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
1,158,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,764 |
|
|
$ |
(39,639 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
Parking |
|
|
226,591 |
|
|
|
229,016 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
Security |
|
|
164,309 |
|
|
|
167,986 |
|
|
|
(3,677 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
Engineering |
|
|
175,541 |
|
|
|
147,410 |
|
|
|
28,131 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,725,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,183 |
|
|
|
(17,838 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial |
|
$ |
63,109 |
|
|
$ |
67,205 |
|
|
$ |
(4,096 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
Parking |
|
|
10,210 |
|
|
|
9,001 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
Security |
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
(904 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
)% |
Engineering |
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
8,704 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(47,699 |
) |
|
|
(39,489 |
) |
|
|
(8,210 |
) |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
37,755 |
|
|
|
48,612 |
|
|
|
(10,857 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
)% |
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on auction rate security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross impairment losses |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Impairments recognized in
other comprehensive income |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
NM |
* |
Interest expense |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
$ |
35,236 |
|
|
$ |
45,631 |
|
|
$ |
(10,395 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janitorial. Janitorial revenues decreased $39.6 million, or 3.3%, during the six months ended April
30, 2010 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009. During 2009, Janitorial experienced
losses of client contracts that exceeded new business, reductions in the level and scope of client
services, contract price compression and declines in the level of tag work, which continued to
influence results in the six months ended April 30, 2010. In addition, during the
six months ended April 30, 2010, Janitorial continued to experience some reductions in the level
and scope of client services and contract price compression as a result of decreases in client
discretionary spending.
Operating profit decreased $4.1 million, or 6.1%, during the six months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily related to the reduction
in revenues, an increase in labor expenses resulting from one additional working day in the six
months ended April 30, 2010 and increases in payroll related costs from increases in state
unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010, partially offset by the cost
control measures.
Parking. Parking revenues decreased $2.4 million, or 1.1%, during the six months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily related to a $4.6
million reduction of expenses incurred on the behalf of managed parking facilities, which are
reimbursed to the Company. These reimbursed expenses are recognized as parking revenues and
expenses, which have no impact on operating profit. The decrease in management reimbursement
revenues was offset by a $2.2 million increase in lease and allowance revenues from new clients and
the expansion of service to existing clients.
Operating profit increased $1.2 million, or 13.4%, during the six months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009. The increase was primarily related to the increase
in lease and allowance revenues and cost control measures.
27
Security. Security revenues decreased $3.7 million, or 2.2%, during the six months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease in revenues was primarily
related to reductions in the level and scope of client services and contract price compression as a
result of decreases in client discretionary spending, partially offset by additional revenues from
new clients in the six months ended April 30, 2010.
Operating profit decreased $0.9 million, or 28.3%, in the six months ended April 30, 2010 compared
to the six months ended April 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily related to the decrease in
revenues, principally those with high gross profit margins, and increases in payroll related costs from increases in state unemployment insurance rates that went into effect on January 1, 2010.
Engineering. Engineering revenues increased $28.1 million, or 19.1%, during the six months ended
April 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009. The increase was primarily related
to additional revenues from new clients and the expansion of services to existing clients.
Operating profit increased by $1.1 million, or 13.1%, in the six months ended April 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009, primarily related to the increase in revenues.
Corporate. Corporate expense increased $8.2 million, or 20.8%, in the six months ended April 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended April 30, 2009.
The increase in Corporate expense was primarily related to:
|
|
|
the absence of a $9.6 million net gain related to a legal settlement for a claim that
was settled and resolved in the three months ended January 31, 2009; |
|
|
|
a $4.4 million increase in a litigation contingency; and |
|
|
|
deferred acquisition costs of $1.0 million, expensed in the six months ended April 30,
2010, due to the adoption of ASC 805; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a $6.1 million year-over-year decrease in information technology costs, net of higher
depreciation costs, primarily related to the upgrade of the payroll, human resources and
accounting systems in 2009. |
Contingencies
The Company has been named a defendant in certain proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Litigation outcomes are often difficult to predict and often are resolved over long
periods of time. Estimating probable losses requires the analysis of multiple possible outcomes
that often depend on judgments about potential actions by third parties. Loss contingencies are
recorded as liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements when it is
both: (1) probable or known that a liability has been incurred and (2) the amount of the loss is
reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and no amount within the
range is a better estimate, the minimum amount of the range is recorded as a liability. Legal costs
associated with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
The Company accrues amounts it believes are adequate to cover any liabilities related to litigation
and arbitration proceedings, and other contingencies that the Company believes will result in a
probable loss. However, the ultimate resolution of such matters is always uncertain. It is possible
that any such proceedings brought against the Company could have a material adverse impact on its
financial condition and results of operations. The total amount accrued for probable losses at
April 30, 2010 was $9.2 million.
The Company is a defendant in several purported class action lawsuits related to alleged violations
of federal or California wage-and-hour laws. The named plaintiffs in these lawsuits are current or
former employees of ABM subsidiaries who allege, among other things, that they were required to
work off the clock, were not paid for all overtime, were not provided work breaks or other
benefits, and/or that they received pay stubs not conforming to California law. In all cases, the
plaintiffs generally seek unspecified monetary damages, injunctive relief or both.
The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit filed July 19, 2007 in the United States District Court,
Eastern District of California, entitled U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff
Erika Morales and Anonymous Plaintiffs One through Eight v. ABM Industries Incorporated et. al.
(the Morales case). The plaintiffs in the Morales case allege sexual harassment, discrimination
and retaliation. In 2009, fourteen claimants joined the lawsuit alleging various claims against the
Company. The case involves both Title VII federal law claims and California state law claims.
Title VII damages are limited to $300,000 per claimant; California state law claims do not contain
such limitations and can include punitive damages as well. The Company has several motions pending
relating to this matter. Since the Company believes that the allegations asserted by the claimants
who joined the Morales case in 2009 are not related to those underlying the originally filed
lawsuit, the Company has moved to separate these claims into two lawsuits. This motion was heard on
May 28, 2010. The court has not ruled on this motion to date. In addition, motions to dismiss many
of the claims on procedural and substantive grounds are scheduled to be heard by the court on June
17, 2010. The Morales case is currently scheduled for trial in August 2010. The Company intends to
continue to vigorously defend itself. The Company has accrued its best estimate of the probable
liability. There can be no assurance that any judgment or settlement relating to the Morales case
will not be material to the Company.
28
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in Item 1, Financial Statements for a discussion of recently
adopted accounting pronouncements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Company to
make estimates in the application of its accounting policies based on the best assumptions,
judgments, and opinions of management. For a description of the Companys critical accounting
policies, see Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009.
Management does not believe that there has been any material changes in the Companys critical
accounting policies and estimates during the six months ended April 30, 2010.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular, statements found in
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that
are not historical in nature, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are often
identified by the words, will, may, should, continue, anticipate, believe, expect,
plan, appear, project, estimate, intend, and words of a similar nature. Such statements
reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
in these statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Any number of factors could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated. These factors include but are not limited to the following:
|
|
|
risks relating to our acquisition strategy may adversely impact our results of
operations; |
|
|
|
intense competition can constrain our ability to gain business, as well as our
profitability; |
|
|
|
we are subject to volatility associated with high deductibles for certain insurable
risks; |
|
|
|
an increase in costs that we cannot pass on to clients could affect our profitability; |
|
|
|
we provide our services pursuant to agreements which are cancelable by either party upon
30 to 60 days notice; |
|
|
|
our success depends on our ability to preserve our long-term relationships with clients; |
|
|
|
our transition to a shared services function could create disruption in functions
affected; |
|
|
|
we incur significant accounting and other control costs that reduce profitability; |
|
|
|
a decline in commercial office building occupancy and rental rates could affect our
revenues and profitability; |
|
|
|
deterioration in economic conditions in general could further reduce the demand for
facility services and, as a result, reduce our earnings and adversely affect our financial
condition; |
|
|
|
financial difficulties or bankruptcy of one or more of our major clients could adversely
affect results; |
|
|
|
our ability to operate and pay our debt obligations depends upon our access to cash; |
|
|
|
future declines or fluctuations in the fair value of our investments in auction rate
securities that are deemed other-than-temporarily impaired could negatively impact our
earnings; |
|
|
|
uncertainty in the credit markets may negatively impact our costs of borrowings, our
ability to collect receivables on a timely basis and our cash flow; |
|
|
|
any future increase in the level of debt or in interest rates can affect our results of
operations; |
|
|
|
an impairment charge could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations; |
|
|
|
we are defendants in several class and representative actions or other lawsuits alleging
various claims that could cause us to incur substantial liabilities; |
|
|
|
since we are an attractive employer for recent émigrés to this country and many of our
jobs are filled by such, changes in immigration laws or enforcement actions or
investigations under such laws could significantly adversely affect our labor force,
operations and financial results and our reputation; |
29
|
|
|
labor disputes could lead to loss of revenues or expense variations; |
|
|
|
federal health care reform legislation may adversely affect our business and results of
operations; |
|
|
|
we participate in multi-employer defined benefit plans which could result in substantial
liabilities being incurred; and |
|
|
|
natural disasters or acts of terrorism could disrupt our services. |
Additional information regarding these and other risks and uncertainties the Company faces is
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 and in
other reports it files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
The Companys primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The potential impact of adverse
increases in this risk is discussed below. The following sensitivity analysis does not consider the
effects that an adverse change may have on the overall economy nor does it consider actions the
Company may take to mitigate its exposure to these changes. Results of changes in actual rates may
differ materially from the following hypothetical results.
Interest Rate Risk
Line of Credit
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk primarily relates to its cash equivalents and London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) based borrowings under the
$450.0 million five year syndicated line of credit that expires in November 2012. At April 30,
2010, outstanding LIBOR and IBOR based borrowings of $145.0 million represented 100% of the
Companys total debt obligations. While these borrowings mature over the next 90 days, the line of
credit extends through November 2012, subject to the terms of the line of credit. The Company
anticipates borrowing similar amounts for periods of one week to three months. A hypothetical 1%
increase in interest rates would add an additional interest expense of $0.3 million on the average
outstanding borrowings under the Companys line of credit, net of the interest rate swap agreement,
during the remainder of 2010.
Interest Rate Swap
On February 19, 2009, the Company entered into a two-year interest rate swap agreement with an
underlying notional amount of $100.0 million, pursuant to which the Company receives variable
interest payments based on LIBOR and pays fixed interest at a rate of 1.47%, This swap is intended
to hedge the interest risk associated with $100.0 million of the Companys floating-rate,
LIBOR-based debt. The critical terms of the swap match the terms of the debt, resulting in no hedge
ineffectiveness. On an ongoing basis (no less than once each quarter), the Company assesses
whether its LIBOR-based interest payments are probable of being paid during the life of the hedging
relationship. The Company also assesses the counterparty credit risk, including credit ratings and
potential non-performance of the counterparty when determining the fair value of the swap.
As of April 30, 2010, the fair value of the interest rate swap was a $0.8 million liability, which
is included in retirement plans and other on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
The effective portion of this cash flow hedge is recorded as accumulated other comprehensive loss
in the Companys accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and reclassified into interest
expense in the Companys accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income in the same
period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the hedge
is recorded immediately to interest expense. No ineffectiveness existed at April 30, 2010. The
amount included in accumulated other comprehensive loss is $0.8 million ($0.5 million, net of
taxes).
Investment in Auction Rate Securities
At April 30, 2010, the Company held investments in auction rate securities from five different
issuers having an aggregate original principal amount of $25.0 million. The investments are not
subject to material interest rate risk. These auction rate securities are debt instruments with
stated maturities ranging from 2025 to 2050, for which the interest rate is designed to be reset
through Dutch auctions approximately every 30 days based on spreads to a base rate (i.e., LIBOR). A
hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates would add approximately $0.1 million of additional
interest income during the remainder of 2010.
30
Foreign Currency
Substantially all of the operations of the Company are conducted in the United States, and, as
such, are not subject to material foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), the Companys principal executive
officer and principal financial officer evaluated the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, these officers concluded
that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, these disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by
the Company in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within the Company have
been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making
can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 30, 2010 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A discussion of material developments in the Companys litigation matters in the period covered by
this report can be found in Note 9, Contingencies, in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in Item 1, Financial Statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors identified in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009, in response to Item 1A, Risk Factors, to Part I of the
Annual Report, except as set forth below.
Federal health care reform legislation may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 were signed into law in the United States (collectively, the Health
Care Reform Laws). The Health Care Reform Laws include a large number of health-related provisions
which become effective over the next four years, including requiring most individuals to have
health insurance and establishing new regulations on health plans. Although the Health Care Reform
Laws do not mandate that employers offer health insurance, beginning in 2014, penalties will be
assessed on large employers who do not offer health insurance that meets certain affordability or
benefit requirements. Providing such additional health insurance benefits to our employees or the
payment of penalties if such coverage is not provided, would increase our expense. If we are unable
to raise the rates we charge our customers to cover this expense, such increases in expense could
reduce our operating profit.
In addition, under the Health Care Reform Laws, employers will have to file a significant amount of
additional information with the Internal Revenue Service and will have to develop systems and
processes to track requisite information. We will have to modify our current systems which could
increase our general and administrative expense.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
31
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Statement of Terms and Conditions Applicable to Options,
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Shares Granted
to Employees Pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and
Restated March 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to
registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated April 2, 2010) (File
No. 1-8929). |
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Awards to
Certain Executive Officers, dated March 31, 2010 (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 to registrants Form 8-K Current Report
dated April 2, 2010) (File No. 1-8929). |
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Awards to Certain Executive
Officers, dated March 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.3 to registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated April 2,
2010) (File No. 1-8929). |
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement -2006 Equity Incentive
Plan. |
|
10.5 |
* |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement-2006 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates management contract, plan or arrangement. |
|
|
|
Indicates filed herewith. |
|
|
|
Indicates furnished herewith. |
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABM Industries Incorporated
|
|
June 4, 2010 |
/s/ James S. Lusk
|
|
|
James S. Lusk |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
June 4, 2010 |
/s/ Dean A. Chin
|
|
|
Dean A. Chin |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
33