UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )

 

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

 

o  Preliminary Proxy Statement

o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e) (2))

þ  Definitive Proxy Statement

o  Definitive Additional Materials

o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

 

MASTEC, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):

 

þ  No fee required

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MasTec, Inc.

800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

(305) 599-1800

 

NOTICE OF 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

To our shareholders:

 

The 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MasTec, Inc. will be held on Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. local time, at the Douglas Entrance Building, South Tower, located at 806 S. Douglas Road, the 10th Floor, Royal Poinciana Conference Room, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

 

 

The proposals are discussed more fully in the Proxy Statement accompanying this notice. Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 2010 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

 

Pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about April 9, 2010 to MasTec’s shareholders of record on March 19, 2010. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions for your use of this process, including how to access our Proxy Statement and Annual Report and how to vote online. In addition, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how you may (i) receive a paper copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report or (ii) elect to receive your Proxy Statement and Annual Report over the Internet.

 

We encourage you to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. You may vote your shares over the Internet. If you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, please mark, sign, date and promptly return the card in the self-addressed stamped envelope provided. Instructions regarding the methods of voting are contained in the Proxy card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card will not limit your right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

Jose R. Mas, Chief Executive Officer

Coral Gables, Florida

April 9, 2010

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF MASTEC, INC.

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

 

Why did I receive this proxy?

 

The Board of Directors of MasTec, Inc. is furnishing this Proxy Statement to solicit proxies on its behalf to be voted at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MasTec to be held at the Douglas Entrance Building, South Tower, located at 806 S. Douglas Road, 10th Floor, Royal Poinciana Conference Room, Coral Gables, Florida 33134, on May 27, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. local time. This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting in person in order to vote.

 

When was this proxy statement first sent or given to security holders?

 

We will begin mailing the notice of availability of these proxy materials on or about April 9, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 2010.

 

Who is entitled to vote?

 

Only holders of record of shares of our common stock at the close of business on March 19, 2010, the record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. On the record date, 75,979,170 shares of common stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting and there were 3,574 record shareholders.

 

What is the quorum for the meeting?

 

The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. No business may be conducted at the Annual Meeting if a quorum is not present. If less than a majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote are represented at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another date, time or place. Notice need not be given of the new date, time or place if announced at the meeting before an adjournment is taken.

 

How many votes do I have?

 

The securities that can be voted at the Annual Meeting are our common stock, with each share entitling its owner to one vote on all matters brought before the Annual Meeting.

 

How do shareholders of record vote?

 

If your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name, you are considered a shareholder of record and you will receive your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials directly from us.

 

For shareholders of record, voting instructions submitted via mail, telephone or the Internet must be received by Bowne, independent tabulator, by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 26, 2010. Submitting your vote via mail, telephone or the Internet will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

 

The Internet and telephone voting procedures available to you are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, to allow shareholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that shareholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Shareholders voting via the Internet or telephone should understand that there may be costs associated with voting in this manner, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies that must be borne by the shareholder.

To vote in person, if you are a registered shareholder, attend the Annual Meeting, bring proof of identity, and deliver your completed Proxy card or ballot in person.

 

How do I vote my shares in person if they are held by my broker?

 

If you hold your shares of common stock through a broker, bank, or other financial institution, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you will receive instructions on how to vote from your broker, bank or other institution. If you hold shares of our common stock in street name and wish to vote in person at the meeting, you must present a recent proxy validating your ownership of the shares of common stock you intend to vote from your bank, broker or other nominee that holds as of the record date your shares of common stock. You will also need proof of identity for entrance to the meeting.

 

How do I vote my shares that are held in my 401(K) Retirement Plan?

 

All persons who have shares of our common stock allocated to their accounts as participants or beneficiaries under the MasTec, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) may instruct Prudential Bank & Trust, which acts as the Trustee for the 401(k) Plan, to vote the shares of common stock held for their account as participants or beneficiaries of the 401(k) Plan. You can instruct the voting of your stock by requesting a voting instruction card to sign, date, and return or by submitting your vote by telephone or through the Internet. Please see the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials we sent to you or this proxy statement for specific instructions on how to provide voting instructions by any of these methods. Please note that your voting instructions for stock you hold in the 401(k) Plan must be returned by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 26, 2010. In the event no voting instruction card is received from a participant or beneficiary or a voting instruction card is received without instructions, or in the event shares are not yet allocated to any participant’s account, those shares will not be voted for any of the proposals. The Trustee does not know of any other business to be brought before the Annual Meeting but it is intended that, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the Trustee as proxy will vote upon such matters according to its judgment.

 

Any 401(k) Plan participant or beneficiary who executes and delivers a proxy card may revoke it at any time prior to its use by executing and delivering a duly executed voting instruction card bearing a later date or by giving written notice to the Trustee. The Trustee will vote the shares held for the accounts of the participants or their beneficiaries in the 401(k) Plan in accordance with the instructions noted thereon, and only the Trustee of the 401(k) Plan can vote the shares allocated to the accounts of participants, even if such participants or their beneficiaries attend the Annual Meeting in person.

 

What am I voting on?

 

At the Annual Meeting, our shareholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

 

 

What vote is required for the Proposals?

 

If a quorum is present, directors will be elected pursuant to the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of common stock voting in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, which means that the three nominees who receive the most affirmative votes will be elected to the Board of Directors. In voting to elect nominees to the Board of Directors, shareholders may vote in favor of all the nominees or any individual nominee or withhold their votes as to all the nominees or any individual nominee. If a quorum is present, ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires a majority of the shares present and voting at the meeting to approve such action.

As of March 19, 2010, our Directors and executive officers beneficially owned or controlled approximately 23 million shares of our common stock (of which 1.6 million shares are beneficially owned through options exercisable within 60 days), constituting approximately 29.6% of the outstanding common stock. We believe that these holders will vote their shares of common stock in favor of the nominees for directors and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

 

Pursuant to Florida law, abstentions are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. For purposes of the election of directors, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker who holds shares in street name for a customer does not have authority to vote on certain non-routine matters under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange because its customer has not provided any voting instructions on the matter. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokerage firms have the authority to vote their customers’ shares on certain routine matters for which they do not receive voting instructions, including Proposal No. 2 (the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm). However commencing in 2010, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, brokerage firms no longer have the authority to vote their customers shares with respect to Proposal No. 1 (the election of the director nominees named in this proxy statement) unless they do receive specific voting instructions from their customers. Therefore, we urge you to give voting instructions to your broker. Shares that are not permitted to be voted by your broker are called “broker non-votes”. Broker non-votes are not considered votes for or against a proposal and therefore will have no direct impact on a proposal. Additionally, if other matters are properly brought before the meeting and they are considered routine under the applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, shares held by brokerage firms may be voted on such routine matters.

 

Will there be any other items of business on the agenda?

 

The Board of Directors does not know of any other matters that may be brought before the Annual Meeting nor does it foresee or have reason to believe that proxy holders will have to vote for substitute or alternate nominees for election to the Board of Directors. In the event that any other matter should come before the Annual Meeting or any nominee is not available for election, the persons named in the proxy that is submitted via the Internet, phone or mail will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies unless otherwise specified to the contrary with respect to such matters in accordance with recommendation of the Board of Directors.

 

What happens if I submit or return my proxy card without voting?

 

When the proxy is properly submitted via the Internet or phone or executed and returned, the shares it represents will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your directions. If the proxy is submitted or returned with no direction, the proxy will be voted “FOR”:

 

 

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

 

A proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise by:

 

 

With respect to telephonic or electronic votes, the last vote transmitted will be the vote counted. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in itself, constitute revocation of a proxy.

 

Will anyone contact me regarding this vote?

 

No arrangements or contracts have been made with any solicitors as of the date of this Proxy Statement, although we reserve the right to engage solicitors if we deem them necessary. Such solicitations may be made by mail, telephone, facsimile, e-mail or personal interviews. In addition, we reserve the right to solicit proxies through our directors, officers and employees in person and by telephone or facsimile.

 

Brokerage firms, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries also may be requested to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares held as of the record date by them.

 

Who has paid for this proxy solicitation?

 

All expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies, including the printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement should you request a printed copy of the proxy materials, will be borne by MasTec.

 

How do I obtain a list of MasTec’s shareholders?

 

A list of MasTec’s shareholders as of March 19, 2010, the record date for the Annual Meeting, will be available for inspection at our corporate headquarters located at 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida, 33134 during normal business hours during the 10-day period prior to the Annual Meeting.

 

How do I submit a proposal for the 2011 Annual Meeting?

 

Under our bylaws, no business may be brought before an annual meeting unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before an annual meeting by or at the direction of our Board of Directors or, in the case of business other than director nominations, by a shareholder entitled to vote who has delivered written notice as specified by our bylaws. Under our bylaws, MasTec must receive any eligible proposal from an eligible shareholder intended to be presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on or before December 10, 2010 for the proposal to be properly brought before the meeting. This same deadline also applies for any shareholder proposal to be eligible for inclusion in our Proxy Statement and Proxy related to that meeting. Any notice regarding any shareholder proposal must include the information specified in Article I, Section 9 of our bylaws. If a shareholder fails to comply with Article I, Section 9 of our bylaws or notifies MasTec after December 10, 2010 of an intent to present any proposal at MasTec’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, irrespective of whether the shareholder is seeking to include the proposal in the Company’s Proxy Statement and Proxy, the proposal will not be considered properly brought before the meeting. A copy of our bylaw requirements will be provided upon written request to: MasTec Legal Department, 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida, 33134.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Robert J. Dwyer, Frank E. Jaumot and Jose S. Sorzano to stand for election as Class III directors at the Annual Meeting, to hold office until the 2013 Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. All of the director nominees are incumbent directors.

 

The Board of Directors currently is composed of eight directors elected in three classes, with three Class I, two Class II, and three Class III directors. Directors in each class hold office for three-year terms. The terms of the classes are staggered so that the term of only one class terminates each year. The terms of the current Class III directors expire at the Annual Meeting. If elected, the nominees for Class III directors will serve until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The terms of the Class I directors expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the terms of the Class II directors expire at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Additional background information regarding the nominees for election is provided below. MasTec has no reason to believe that any of these nominees will refuse or be unable to serve as a director if elected; however, if any of the nominees is unable to serve, each proxy that does not direct otherwise will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors.

 

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nominees named above. Unless otherwise indicated, all proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for election as a Class III director named above.

 

Information as to Nominees and Other Directors

 

Nominees for Class III Directors

 

Robert J. Dwyer, 66, joined our Board of Directors in October 2004. Mr. Dwyer retired in 1999. Prior to 1999, Mr. Dwyer spent 17 years with Morgan Stanley and Dean Witter Reynolds in various executive positions. Mr. Dwyer is a private investor. He currently serves as a director of Bny/Ivy Multi-Strategy Hedge Fund, LLC., Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund, LLC. Mr. Dwyer has numerous charitable and civic interests. Mr. Dwyer has 33 years experience in financial markets; including capital markets and mergers and acquisitions.

 

Frank E. Jaumot, 53, joined our Board of Directors in September 2004. Mr. Jaumot has been the Director of Accounting and Auditing for the certified public accounting firm of Ahearn, Jasco and Company, P.A. since 1991. From 1979 to 1991, Mr. Jaumot was associated with Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Jaumot is a certified public accountant in Florida and Ohio and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He also is a member of the Board of Directors for Junior Achievement of South Florida (a not for profit charity), Bimini Capital Management, Inc. and PPOA Holding, Inc. Mr. Jaumot has extensive experience in accounting, auditing and SEC reporting.

 

Jose S. Sorzano, 69, has been a member of our Board of Directors since October 1995. Mr. Sorzano has been Chairman of The Austin Group, Inc., an international corporate consulting firm, since 1989, a director of Securiport LLC, a privately held biometric company, and a director of the Free Cuba Committee. Mr. Sorzano was also Special Assistant to President Reagan for National Security Affairs from 1987 to 1988; Associate Professor of Government, Georgetown University, from 1969 to 1987; and Ambassador and U.S. Deputy to the United Nations from 1981 to 1985. Mr. Sorzano has significant experience in governmental and international affairs.

 

Class I Directors

 

Ernst N. Csiszar, 59, joined our Board of Directors in October 2005. Mr. Csiszar is currently a private investor and serves as Director of Insurance for Bridge Strategy Group, LLC. Mr. Csiszar also serves as a director of PHTS, Inc., a privately-held company. From September 2004 until his retirement in September 2006, Mr. Csiszar was the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, the property and casualty insurance industry’s principal trade association. Mr. Csiszar was the Director of Insurance for the State of South Carolina from February 1999 to August 2004 and also served as president of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Mr. Csiszar also served as the president and chief executive officer of Seibels Bruce

Group, Inc. of Columbia, S.C. from 1995 to 1998. Previously, he was a visiting professor at the School of Business at the University of South Carolina and served as managing co-director of the European investment banking firm, Holborn Holdings Corporation, in Geneva, Switzerland. Mr. Csiszar has critical experience in insurance and risk management.

 

Julia L. Johnson, 47, has been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2002. From January 2001 to the present, Ms. Johnson has been President of NetCommunications, L.L.C., and a strategy consulting firm specializing in the communications, energy, and information technology public policy arenas. Prior to founding NetCommunications, Ms. Johnson was Vice President of Marketing for MILCOM Technologies, Inc., a military technology commercialization company, from March 2000 to August 2001. From November 2001 to the present, Ms. Johnson has also served as founder and Chairman of the Emerging Issues Policy Forum, a public policy organization established to promote open public policy discussions on key market, industrial and regulatory issues. Ms. Johnson served on the Florida Public Service Commission from January 1992 until November 1999, serving as chairwoman from January 1997 to January 1999. Ms. Johnson also chaired Florida’s Information Service Technology Development Task Force, which advised then Florida Governor Jeb Bush on information technology policy and related legislative issues, from November 1999 to July 2001. Ms. Johnson also serves on the boards of Allegheny Energy, Inc., Northwestern Corporation and American Water Works Company, Inc. Ms. Johnson’s legal background and experience in public utility regulatory arenas provide her with key skills in implementing corporate strategies and evaluating our primary markets.

 

Jorge Mas, 47, has been Chairman of our Board of Directors since January 1998 and a director since March 1994. From March 1994 to October 1999, Mr. Mas was our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mas has been Chairman of the Board of the Cuban American National Foundation, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation, since July 1999. Mr. Mas is the brother of Jose R. Mas.

 

Class II Directors

 

José R. Mas, 38, has been our Chief Executive Officer since April 2007. From April 2007 to January 2010 Mr. Mas was also our President. Mr. Mas served as MasTec’s Vice Chairman of the Board and Executive Vice President — Business Development from August 2001 until March 2007. Mr. Mas started with MasTec in 1992, and from 1999 until 2001 he was head of MasTec’s Communications Service Operation. Mr. Mas is the brother of Jorge Mas, our Chairman of the Board.

 

John Van Heuvelen, 63, has been a member of our Board of Directors since June 2002. Mr. Van Heuvelen spent 13 years with Morgan Stanley and Dean Witter Reynolds in various executive positions in the mutual fund, unit investment trust and municipal bond divisions before serving as president of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Trust Company from 1993 until 1999. Since 1999, Mr. Van Heuvelen has been a private investor based in Denver, Colorado. His investment activities have included private telecom and technology firms, where he still remains active. In addition, Mr. Van Heuvelen was owner of a construction company for six years. He served on the board of directors of LifeVantage, Inc. from August 2005 through August 2007. Mr. Van Heuvelen currently serves on the board of Hallador Energy Company. Mr. Van Heuvelen has important leadership skills and impressive experience in our key markets.

 

Certain Legal Proceedings

 

In connection with the bankruptcy in 2000 of Sistemas e Instalaciones de Telecomunicación S.A. (“Sintel”), a former MasTec subsidiary which was sold in 1998, Mr. Jorge Mas was named as a defendant along with other defendants in the matter disclosed in our 2009 10-K solely as a result of his membership on the Sintel and MasTec boards. Mr. Mas was not directly involved in any of the transactions, which the Spanish prosecutors allege led to Sintel’s bankruptcy. Mr. Mas believes the claims are frivolous and is vigorously defending against them.

 

OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board of Directors, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, has determined that a majority of our directors qualify as independent directors pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and regulations. In making the determination of independence, the Board considered that no independent director has a material

relationship with MasTec, either directly or as a partner or shareholder of an organization that has a relationship with MasTec or any other relationships that, in the Board’s judgment, would interfere with the director’s independence. Our independent directors are Ernst N. Csiszar, Robert J. Dwyer, Frank E. Jaumot, Julia L. Johnson, Jose S. Sorzano, and John Van Heuvelen. John Van Heuvelen has been selected as the lead independent director to preside over all executive sessions of the independent directors. Jorge Mas presides over all executive sessions of the nonmanagement directors. Both the independent directors and nonmanagement directors meet separately in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.

 

The Board of Directors is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect MasTec. The committees of the Board are primarily responsible for the oversight of risk as follows: the Audit Committee has oversight over accounting and control risks, the Compensation Committee has oversight to ensure our compensation and incentive plans do not encourage undue risk and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the independence of the Board of Directors, corporate ethics and governance risk. However, the full Board has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Board satisfies this responsibility by receiving reports from the committee chairs as well as regular reports directly from officers of MasTec responsible for particular risks.

 

The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of the full Board and through committees of the Board, including the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board and its committees also act by written consent. During 2009, the Board of Directors met on seven occasions. During 2009, each of the current directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the Board meetings and the meetings of each committee on which such director served.

 

In 2009, John Van Heuvelen was appointed lead director of the Board. In this role he is a member of every committee and involved in all committee activities. The lead director is also responsible for facilitating communication between management and the Board.

 

The Executive Committee is composed of Jorge Mas, who serves as Chairman, Julia L. Johnson and John Van Heuvelen. The principal function of the Executive Committee is to act for the Board of Directors when action is required between full Board meetings. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2009.

 

The Audit Committee is composed of Frank Jaumot, who is currently serving as its Chairman, John Van Heuvelen and Ernst N. Csiszar. The Board of Directors, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, has determined that (i) John Van Heuvelen and Frank E. Jaumot qualify as “audit committee financial expert(s),” (ii) each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate, and (iii) each member of the Audit Committee is independent, under applicable New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and regulations. The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing MasTec’s financial reporting and legal and regulatory compliance program. The Audit Committee also is required to approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, including the scope of such services and fees paid to our independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors has adopted a charter that sets forth the responsibilities of the Audit Committee. During 2009, the Audit Committee met on ten occasions. Please refer to the section entitled “Audit Committee and Audit Related Information” for further information regarding the Audit Committee.

 

The Compensation Committee is composed of Jose S. Sorzano, who currently serves as Chairman, Frank E. Jaumot, Robert J. Dwyer, Julia Johnson and John Van Heuvelen, all of whom the Board of Directors, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, has determined to be independent, under applicable New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and regulations. The Compensation Committee is charged with discharging the Board of Director’s responsibilities relating to compensation and evaluation of MasTec’s executive officers, including establishing compensation policies and philosophies for MasTec and its executive officers and reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to MasTec’s Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, as well as overseeing MasTec’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans that are subject to Board approval. The Compensation Committee has the power to create subcommittees with such powers as the Compensation Committee may from time to time confer to such subcommittees. For a description of the role performed by executive officers in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The Board of Directors has adopted a charter that sets forth the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee. During 2009, the Compensation Committee met on six occasions.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of Julia L. Johnson, who serves as Chairman, Ernst N. Csiszar, Robert Dwyer, John Van Heuvelen and Jose S. Sorzano, all of whom the Board of Directors, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, has determined to be independent, under applicable New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and regulations. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for developing qualifications for members of the Board of Directors, recommending to the Board of Directors candidates for election to the Board of Directors and evaluating the effectiveness and performance of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also develops implements and monitors MasTec’s corporate governance principles and its code of business conduct and ethics; monitors and safeguards the Board’s independence; and annually undertakes performance evaluations of the Board committees and the full Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has adopted a charter that sets forth the responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During 2009, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met on four occasions.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has no specific minimum qualifications for director candidates. In general, however, persons considered for membership on the Board must have demonstrated leadership capabilities, be of sound mind and high moral character and be willing and able to commit the necessary time for Board and committee service. In evaluating potential candidates for service on the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, consistent with its charter, the candidate’s ability to satisfy the New York Stock Exchange’s and SEC’s independence requirements and the candidate’s ability to contribute to the effective oversight and management of MasTec. The Board of Directors has determined that the Board as a whole must have the right diversity, mix of characteristics and skills for the optimal functioning of the Board in its oversight of MasTec taking into account the needs of MasTec, the individual’s experience, perspective, skills and knowledge of the industry in which MasTec operates, and such other factors as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, in its discretion, deem important to successful service as a director.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by the shareholders pursuant to written applications submitted to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Corporate Secretary, MasTec, Inc., 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. The information required to be included in any such recommendation is set forth in our by-laws, and the general qualifications and specific qualities and skills established by the committee for directors are included in the Charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. No recommended nominees were received by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from any shareholder or group of shareholders who beneficially own five percent or more of our common stock for the previous year’s Annual Meeting.

 

The full text of our current Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charters, as well as, our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on MasTec’s website located at www.mastec.com and are available in print to any shareholder who requests it at MasTec, Inc., Legal Department, 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. Our Internet website and the information contained therein, other than material expressly referred to in this proxy statement, or connected thereto, are not incorporated into this proxy statement.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

In 2009, none of our executive officers or directors was a member of the board of directors of any other company where the relationship would be considered a committee interlock under SEC rules.

 

Other Corporate Governance Matters

 

Interested parties who want to communicate with the presiding director or with the independent or nonmanagement directors as a group, with the Board as a whole, any Board committee or any individual Board members, should address their communications to the Board, the Board members or the Board committee, as the case may be, and send them to c/o Corporate Secretary, MasTec, Inc., 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida 33134 or call the Corporate Secretary at (305) 406-1849. The Corporate Secretary will forward all such communications directly to such Board members. Any such communications may be made on an anonymous and confidential basis.

MasTec does not have a policy requiring our directors to attend the Annual Meeting. All of our directors attended our 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

MasTec has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, called the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees which include additional criteria that are applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The full text of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on MasTec’s website at www.mastec.com and is available in print to any shareholder who requests it. We intend to provide amendments or waivers to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for any of our directors and senior officers on our website within four business days of such amendment or waiver. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website and should not be considered part of this Proxy Statement.

 

Executive Officers

 

Our current executive officers are as follows:

 

 

Biographical information for Mr. Jose R. Mas can be found in the section entitled “Class II Directors” beginning on page 8.

 

Ray Harris became our President on January 25, 2010. Mr. Harris brings to MasTec over 30 years of experience in the utility and energy industries. Most recently he served as President and CEO of Mesa Power, founded by T. Boone Pickens, to develop and finance wind and other renewable energy power projects. In his capacity with Mesa, he primarily concentrated on power project development, acquisition and finance, including the creation of the American Wind Alliance, Mesa’s joint development effort with General Electric. Previously, Mr. Harris has served as Vice President, Renewable Energy for Texas Utilities, Vice President of Marketing for The Shaw Group and held various positions during a 20-year tenure with Southern Company. Mr. Harris is a 1979 engineering graduate of Auburn University.

 

Robert Apple has been our Chief Operating Officer since December 2006. Previously, Mr. Apple served as group president for MasTec’s energy service operations since 2005. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Apple was a senior vice president at DIRECTV^®, where he was responsible for the installation and service network, warranty program, supply chain management and national dispatch support. From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Apple, while on assignment from Hughes Electronics/DIRECTV^® Latin America to Telefonica S.A., served as Chief Operating Officer and Board member of Via Digital, a direct broadcast satellite company and Telefonica affiliate. From 1985 to 1996, Mr. Apple served in various capacities within the Hughes Electronics organization, including as Chief Executive Officer of Hughes Electronics-Spain, Vice President of Hughes Europe and as a program manager for a Hughes Electronics training and support systems group.

 

C. Robert Campbell has been our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2004. Mr. Campbell has over 30 years of senior financial management experience. From 2002 to 2004, he was Executive Vice President and CFO for TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Campbell was the President and CEO of BAX Global, Inc. and from 1995 to 1998 Executive Vice President-Finance and CFO for Advantica Restaurant Group, Inc. From 1974 until 1995, Mr. Campbell held various senior management positions with Ryder Systems, Inc., including 10 years as Executive Vice President and CFO of its Vehicle Leasing and Services Division. Mr. Campbell, who is a Certified Public Accountant, has a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Relations from the University of North Carolina, an MBA from Columbia University and a Master of Science in Accounting from Florida International University.

Alberto de Cardenas has been our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary responsible for all of MasTec’s corporate and operational legal matters and corporate secretary matters since November 2005. From March 2003 to November 2005, Mr. de Cardenas was Senior Vice President and General Counsel and from January through March 2003, Vice President and Corporate General Counsel of Perry Ellis International, Inc. From September 1996 through December 2002, Mr. de Cardenas was a corporate and securities attorney at Broad and Cassel. From September 1990 to July 1993, Mr. de Cardenas was an accountant at Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE AND ANALYSIS

 

What is Our General Philosophy Regarding Executive Pay?

 

We compensate our executive management team members primarily through a mix of salary, bonuses and equity compensation. Our compensation plans are designed to attract and retain talented, qualified executives to lead our organization, and align executive management incentives with the long-term interests of our shareholders. When we set compensation amounts and select compensation components for our executive management we strive to reward the achievement of both short-term and long-term results that will promote earnings growth and stock appreciation. Overall, our compensation philosophy is intended to provide fair base pay levels with meaningful upside for strong performance. This compensation philosophy extends to all levels of MasTec management.

 

How Do We Determine Our Compensation Levels?

 

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for assessing recommendations of pay and approving pay levels for executive management. We target our compensation levels with the following goals in mind: (a) fair base pay and benefits; (b) short-term and long-term incentives that reward performance and share value appreciation, and (c) appropriate levels of security and benefits that are needed to attract and retain talented and qualified executives.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Compensation Committee periodically review individual pay levels of members of executive management. We do not, however, compare ourselves against any particular peer group. Compensation levels are determined based upon our philosophy, recruiting needs, growth expectations and performance.

 

Our CEO makes recommendations to our Compensation Committee of pay levels for executive management members other than himself. The Compensation Committee reviews those recommendations and then determines the compensation levels for all members of executive management. The Compensation Committee’s decisions are then either approved or modified by the Board of Directors.

 

What Components of Compensation Do We Use?

 

The three primary components of compensation for our organization are salary, bonuses, and equity incentives (restricted stock and stock options). Each is described in more detail below.

 

Salary

 

Salaries initially are negotiated and set forth in employment agreements between each of our executives and us. Thereafter, our Compensation Committee reviews the salaries of our executive management annually. Salaries are established by (a) reviewing the performance of the executive, (b) adjusting (upwards or downward) to reflect individual qualifications, job uniqueness and performance, and (c) engaging in discussions between the CEO and the Compensation Committee in order to make revisions as needed. All of the current salaries of our executive management team are the salaries negotiated in their respective employment agreements, except for Jose Mas. The Compensation Committee approved an increase for Mr. Mas effective April 2, 2010. Mr. Mas’ new annual base salary is $650,000. The Compensation Committee increased Mr. Mas’ salary upon completion of his annual review. As part of the review the Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation for the CEO’s of several competitors including; Dycom, MYR group, Pike, Quanta, Tetra Tech and Wilbros Group. The Compensation Committee awarded the increase based upon the competitive review as well as Mr. Mas’ strong performance as CEO

as reflected by the operating performance of the company and the successful acquisitions of strategic companies during his tenure.

 

Bonuses

 

All members of our executive management team are eligible to receive cash bonuses based upon performance. Each executive’s employment agreement provides that he is entitled to receive an annual bonus of up to 100% of his base salary based upon performance, except Mr. de Cardenas who is eligible for annual bonuses of up to 50% of his base salary. Bonuses are determined by the Compensation Committee as of the close of each fiscal year and are paid shortly thereafter.

 

The Compensation Committee determined that 2009 bonuses would not be based upon any predetermined specific quantitative or qualitative performance targets, but instead would be determined by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, at the close of the fiscal year based upon the overall performance of MasTec and the executive. The Compensation Committee awarded cash bonuses for 2009 on the basis of MasTec’s continued improvement despite a difficult economic environment, a stronger balance sheet and the successful integration of key strategic acquisitions. Messrs. Mas, Apple, Campbell and de Cardenas received $400,000; $300,000; $275,000 and $175,000 respectively. See the 2009 Summary Compensation Table for details. The Compensation Committee has determined that the 2010 bonuses also will not be based upon any predetermined quantitative or qualitative performance targets, but instead will be determined by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, at the end of 2010 based upon the overall financial performance of MasTec.

 

Additionally, we occasionally pay cash bonuses in connection with the execution of employment agreements for new employees as necessary to attract qualified professionals. No members of the executive management team received any cash bonus in connection with the execution of an employment agreement.

 

Equity Compensation

 

We believe that equity ownership by executive management is important in order to align our long-term rewards program with the interests of our shareholders. Additionally, long-term awards are needed to attract and retain talented and success-driven employees.

 

All executive management equity awards are granted at regularly scheduled meetings, other than those granted upon execution of employment agreements, and the exercise prices of all options are set at the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant. We do not have a program, plan, or practice of timing equity award grants in order to benefit our executive officers or in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

 

It has been our practice to make an equity award to each executive officer upon the execution of his or her employment agreement. Option grants to new executives generally vest over a period of years (from two to five years) and no options vest before the one-year anniversary of the option grant, with most vesting at the end of the two to five year period. Similarly, restrictions on restricted stock awards generally lapse in two to five years and no restrictions lapse prior to the end of the one year anniversary of the stock grant. Mr. Mas received 100,000 restricted shares upon the execution of his employment agreement on April 18, 2007. The shares all vest at the end of five years. Mr. de Cardenas received 5,000 restricted shares upon the execution of his employment agreement on February 27, 2008. Mr. Campbell received 25,000 shares upon the execution of his employment agreement on August 15, 2009. Mr. Apple received 37,500 shares upon the execution of his employment agreement on January 1, 2010. All of Messrs. Apple’s, Campbell’s and de Cardenas’ shares granted upon execution of their employment agreements described above vest at the end of three years.

 

In addition, our Compensation Committee will periodically recommend, and our Board of Directors will approve the award of additional grants for our named executive officers. These grants are discretionary and intended to align our executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders. The awards are also granted as a retention tool and generally vest at the end of a three year period. Other than the equity awards granted upon execution of employment agreements described above, no equity awards were granted in 2009. On January 22, 2010, Mr. de Cardenas received 7,500 shares which will vest at the end of three years. As of March 19, 2010 , no other equity awards have

been granted in 2010. Equity awards are made pursuant to our 2003 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, which first was approved by both our Board of Directors and our shareholders in 2003 (the “SIP”). The SIP was amended and restated, and approved by our Board of Directors, in 2006.

 

The Compensation Committee administers our SIP. The administrator has the authority to determine the terms and conditions of the awards made under the SIP.

 

Retirement Benefits

 

401(k) Plan

 

We maintain a 401(k) plan for all employees who have completed at least six months of service. Our executives may participate in the plan but, in general, their contributions may be limited under the current rules affecting highly compensated employees. We make discretionary matching contributions into the plan. The amount of the matching contribution is determined on an annual basis. For 2009, our matching contribution was 100% of the first 1% of compensation that each eligible participant elected to contribute to the plan that year. Company matching contributions vest at a rate of 1/3 per year of service. An employee’s elective contributions are 100% vested when contributed. The 401(k) Plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As such, contributions to the 401(k) Plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the 401(k) Plan, and all contributions are deductible by us when made. The amounts of our matching contributions for 2009, 2008 and 2007 under the 401(k) Plan are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 17.

 

On March 31, 2008, our Board of Directors adopted the MasTec Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan effective June 1, 2008. Certain management and highly compensated employees, including executive officers, are eligible to participate in the plan. The plan is intended to provide this group of employees with an opportunity on a voluntary basis to defer compensation without regard to the legal limits imposed on our qualified 401(k) plan. Under the plan, participants are allowed to defer up to 50% of their base salary and 100% of their bonus in any given year. Our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, but is not required to, credit a contribution to any participants account under the Plan. Such contributions may be smaller or larger than the amount credited to any other participant in any given year. Participants may obtain distributions from the plan only on termination of employment at which time the distribution will be fully taxable to the employee.

 

Split Dollar Benefit and Deferred Bonus Agreements

 

Effective as of August 3, 2004, MasTec and Jose Mas entered into a split dollar agreement wherein MasTec agreed to pay premiums on a life insurance policy with an aggregate face amount of $11 million. Under the terms of the agreement, MasTec was the sole owner and beneficiary of the policy and was entitled to recover the greater of (i) all premiums it pays on the policy plus interest equal to four percent, compounded annually, or (ii) the aggregate cash value of the life insurance policy immediately prior to the death of the insured. The remainders of the policy’s proceeds were to be paid in accordance with Jose Mas’ designations. MasTec was to make the premium payments until the agreement was terminated, which would occur upon any of the following events: (i) bankruptcy, or dissolution of MasTec, or (ii) a change of control of MasTec.

 

On April 3, 2007, MasTec and Jose Mas entered into a deferred bonus agreement in which MasTec agreed to pay Mr. Mas a bonus in the event the split dollar agreement Mr. Mas had entered into with MasTec was terminated due to a change of control. The amount of the bonus was equal to the total premium payments made by MasTec under the terms of the split dollar agreements, plus interest of four percent, compounded annually. The bonus was to be paid within 60 days after termination of the split dollar agreement.

 

On October 28, 2009, the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements between Jose Mas and the Company were amended and restated in their entirety. The amended and restated split dollar agreement provides that one or more life insurance policies may be subject to the agreement. At this time, however, the only policy subject to the agreement is the one acquired pursuant to the original agreement. MasTec remains the sole owner and beneficiary of any policy subject to the agreement, and upon the death of the insured, MasTec is entitled to receive a portion of the death benefit equal to the greater of (i) all premiums paid by MasTec on such policy or (ii) the then cash value of

such policy immediately before the death of the insured, excluding surrender charges. Upon termination of the agreement, Jose Mas has an option to purchase each policy subject to the agreement for a purchase price equal to the greater of those two amounts. The amount of the deferred bonus under the amended and restated deferred bonus agreement that is payable upon termination of the split dollar agreement is equal to the sum of the following amounts determined with respect to each policy subject to the split dollar agreement: the greater of (i) all premiums paid by MasTec under the terms of such policy or (ii) the then cash value of such policy immediately prior to the change in control, excluding surrender charges. All other material provisions of the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements remain unchanged. See “Related Person Transactions” for additional information concerning the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements, including the amount of premiums paid in 2009.

 

Benefits and Perks

 

In keeping with our philosophy that senior executive compensation should be variable with corporate performance, the Compensation Committee prefers to compensate our named executive officers in cash and equity rather than benefits and perquisites. However, we do provide a limited number of standard benefits and perquisites to our named executive officers in order for us to be successful in attracting and retaining executives in a competitive marketplace. The total amount of benefits and perquisites provided to the named executive officers during 2009 was only a small percentage of each executive officer’s total compensation. These amounts are included in the second to last column of the Summary Compensation Table at page 17 under “All Other Compensation” and related footnotes.

 

Employment Agreements

 

We generally negotiate employment agreements with our named executive officers. The purpose of these arrangements is to secure qualified executives for leadership positions in our organization as well as to protect our intellectual property by virtue of restrictive covenants contained in the agreements. As of March 19, 2010, we had employment agreements with all of our named executive officers for their current positions.

 

Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements

 

Our employment agreements provide for the payment of certain compensation and benefits in the event of the termination of an executive’s employment. The amount payable varies depending upon the reason for such termination. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the essential terms of these termination provisions, and believes they are reasonable and appropriate.

 

Tax and Accounting Implications

 

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, precludes public companies from taking a federal income tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to any of our named executive officers unless certain specific and detailed criteria are met. One of these requirements is that the compensation be “performance based” under a plan approved by our shareholders.

 

It is expected that stock options granted under our SIP will qualify for the “performance based” exceptions from the Section 162(m) limitation. Although bonuses payable to our executives for 2009, and restricted stock awards, will not qualify as performance based compensation, we do not believe that this will result in any material amount of compensation being non-deductible by us. No portion of the Mastec’s deduction for compensation expense for 2009 was limited by reason of Section 162(m).

 

Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

 

Before granting stock-based compensation awards, the Compensation Committee considers the accounting impact of the award as structured and under various other scenarios in order to analyze the expected impact of the award.

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Requirements

 

MasTec does not currently maintain any stock ownership guidelines or requirements for our named executive officers but our Compensation Committee does periodically monitor such ownership.

 

2009 Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table summarizes the compensation information for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 for our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and each of our other most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of the last fiscal year. We refer to these persons as our named executive officers elsewhere in this proxy statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2009

 

The following table provides additional information about the plan based awards granted to the named executive officers in the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2009

 

The following table sets forth our outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2009 for our named executive officers.

 

 

 

Options Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2009

 

No restricted stock awards vested and no stock options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009 for our named executive officers.

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

The following table sets forth the employer and employee contributions to, earnings under, and aggregate balances of nonqualified defined contribution and other deferred compensation plans we maintain.

 

 

 

 

Potential Payments upon Change in Control and Termination of Employment

 

Each of the named executive officers has an employment agreement with us that provides for us to make continued payments and provide certain benefits to the executive upon termination of employment with our company. Each of the employment agreements also provides for each of the named executive officers to receive certain payments in the event of a change in control, as follows:

 

 

 

For these purposes, “Change in Control” generally means:

 

 

For purposes of this definition, the terms “affiliate,” “associate,” “parent” and “subsidiary” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 under Section 12 of the 1934 Act.

 

Each of the named executive officers’ employment agreements also provides that the named executive officers would be entitled to receive certain payments in the event that their respective employments were terminated as follows:

 

 

 

The following tables illustrate the payments and benefits that each named executive officer would have received under his employment agreement if his employment with MasTec had terminated on December 31, 2009 for any of the reasons described in the table. The amounts presented in the tables are estimates and do not necessarily reflect the actual value of the payments and of the benefits that would be received by the named executive officers, which would only be known at the time that employment actually terminates.

 

Estimates of the amount that would be payable in the event that a change in control or other termination had occurred on December 31, 2009 except as otherwise noted below are quantified in the following tables:

 

Executive:     Jose R. Mas

 

 

 

 

Executive:     Robert Apple

 

 

 

 

Executive:     C. Robert Campbell

 

 

 

 

Executive:     Alberto de Cardenas

 

 

 

 

Employment and Other Agreements

 

On April 18, 2007, MasTec entered into a new employment agreement with Jose R. Mas, MasTec’s President and Chief Executive Officer, effective as of April 18, 2007. The term of the Agreement will continue until the Agreement is terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions thereof, and provides that Mr. Mas will be paid an annual salary of $500,000. The Agreement also provides that Mr. Mas shall be eligible for annual performance bonuses of up to his base salary based on the achievement of goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Mr. Mas received 100,000 shares of MasTec’s common stock which vest, based on continued service and his compliance with certain negative covenants as set forth in the Agreement, on the fifth anniversary of the Agreement. This restricted stock vests immediately upon termination of the agreement so long as Mr. Mas is not terminated for cause (as such term is defined in the agreement). Following termination of employment by MasTec without cause or by Mr. Mas for good reason, Mr. Mas will receive his base salary, an amount equal to the average of the performance bonuses he received during the term of the agreement and benefits from the date of termination for twelve months. If there is a change of control of MasTec during the employment term, Mr. Mas will be entitled to one and a half times his base salary and average performance bonuses during the term of the Agreement, a gross-up payment if an excise tax is triggered, the immediate vesting of any previously unvested options and restricted stock and the continuation of benefits as provided in the agreement. The agreement also contains confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.

 

Effective January 1, 2010, MasTec entered into an employment agreement with Robert Apple relating to his employment as Chief Operating Officer. The agreement will remain in effect until terminated, and provides that Mr. Apple will be paid an annual salary of $440,000. The agreement also provides for annual performance bonuses of up to his base salary based on the achievement of goals established by our compensation committee, in its sole discretion. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Apple received 37,500 shares of MasTec’s common stock which vest on the third anniversary of the effective date of the Agreement. Following termination of Mr. Apple’s employment by us without cause (as defined in the agreement) or by Mr. Apple for good reason (as defined in the agreement), Mr. Apple would receive his base salary, an amount equal to the average of the performance bonuses he received during the last three calendar years and certain employee benefits set forth in the agreement from the date of termination for twelve months. If there is a change of control of MasTec during the employment term, Mr. Apple will be entitled to one and a half times his (i) base salary for twelve months and (ii) average performance bonuses during the last three calendar years for which he was our employee divided by twelve for twelve months, a gross-up

payment if an excise tax is triggered, the immediate vesting of any previously unvested options and restricted stock and the continuation of benefits as set forth in the agreement. The agreement also contains confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.

 

Effective August 15, 2009, MasTec entered into an employment agreement with C. Robert Campbell relating to his employment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The agreement expires on August 14, 2011, unless earlier terminated, and provides that Mr. Campbell will be paid an annual salary of $400,000. The agreement also provides for annual performance bonuses of up to his base salary. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Campbell received 25,000 shares of MasTec’s common stock which vest on August 15, 2012. Following termination of Mr. Campbell’s employment by us without cause (as defined in the agreement) or by Mr. Campbell for good reason (as defined in the agreement), Mr. Campbell will receive his base salary and certain employee benefits set forth in the agreement from the date of termination until August 14, 2012. If the agreement is terminated by MasTec not renewing or extending the employment agreement or the parties cannot mutually agree to renew or extend Mr. Campbell’s employment then Mr. Campbell will be entitled to the severance benefits described above from the completion of the term of the agreement until August 14, 2012. If there is a change of control of MasTec during the employment term, Mr. Campbell will be entitled to immediate vesting of any unvested options and restricted stock. The agreement also contains confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.

 

Effective January 1, 2008, MasTec entered into an employment agreement with Alberto de Cardenas relating to his employment as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. The agreement expires on December 31, 2011, unless earlier terminated, and provides that Mr. de Cardenas will be paid an annual salary of $315,000. The agreement also provides for annual performance bonuses of up to 50% of his base salary. The agreement also entitles Mr. de Cardenas to receive 5,000 shares of our common stock which shall vest 100% on the third anniversary of the Effective Date. Mr. de Cardenas may also participate in our bonus plan for senior management and for equity to be granted pursuant to our SIP. Following termination of employment by MasTec without cause or by Mr. de Cardenas for good reason, Mr. de Cardenas will receive his base salary and benefits for a period of twelve months from the date of termination. If there is a change of control of MasTec during the employment term, Mr. de Cardenas will be entitled to two times his base salary, to the immediate vesting of any previously unvested options and restricted stock and the continuation of benefits as set forth in the agreement. The agreement also contains confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.

 

Compensation of Directors

 

2009 Director Compensation

 

At the beginning of 2009, the independent director’s compensation included an annual retainer of $90,000. In addition, the Audit Committee Chairperson was paid $10,000 per year and each other audit committee member was paid $5,000 per year for service. The Compensation Committee Chairperson and the Nominating and Governance Committee Chairperson were paid $2,500 per year.

 

At the direction of the Board in 2009, the Compensation Committee hired F.W. Cook to conduct an independent review of MasTec’s independent director compensation. Management provided background information and confirmed the accuracy of the current program summary. F.W. Cook & Co., Inc. provided a competitive analysis of non-employee director compensation programs at 13 peer companies and recommended changes to the MasTec independent director compensation program. The peer companies were selected using the following process:

 

 

After thorough review of the F.W. Cook report, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved changes to the independent director compensation to be effective July 1, 2009. The retainer has changed to $30,000 per calendar quarter. At least one third of the quarterly retainer must be taken by the director in the form of equity. The director can choose between fully vested whole shares or a fully vested option grant. The option grant would be valued in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 with an expiration of 10 years. The remainder, if any, is taken in the form of cash. In addition, the Lead Independent Director receives $5,000 per quarter, the Audit Committee Chairperson receives $2,500 per quarter, the Compensation and Nominating Committee Chairpersons receive $1,250 per quarter, and all committee members receive $750 for each committee meeting attended.

 

Directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in order to attend Board and Committee meetings and in their performance of director duties.

 

Option and restricted stock awards granted to our independent directors are governed by our Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employees, which we refer to as the Non-Employee Incentive Plan. All formula options are granted at an exercise price equal to, and formula restricted stock grants are based on, the fair market value of MasTec’s common stock based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. In addition to the formula grants, the Compensation Committee, which administers the Non-Employee Incentive Plan, may also make discretionary grants of stock options and restricted stock awards to non-employee directors.

 

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted a Deferred Fee Plan. Under the terms of the Deferred Fee Plan, directors may elect to defer the receipt of cash and stock fees for their services as directors. Each director may elect the type and percentage of fees to be deferred. Deferred cash fees may be directed to a deferred cash account or a deferred stock account (or both). Deferred stock fees may only be directed to a deferred stock account. Elections to defer fees remain in force, unless amended or revoked within the required time periods. The deferred cash account will be credited with interest on the cash balance at the end of each calendar quarter. The interest rate is equal to the rate of interest payable by us on our revolving credit facility, as determined as of the first day of each calendar quarter. The deferred stock account will be credited with stock dividends (or with cash dividends that are converted to deferred stock credits pursuant to the plan). Distribution of a director’s cash and stock accounts will begin on January 15 of the year following the directors’ termination of all services with us or, in the case of a change of control (as defined in the Deferred Fee Plan), in a lump sum as soon as practicable following such change of control. Distributions from the deferred cash account will be made in cash and distributions from the deferred stock account will be made in shares of MasTec’s common stock. Distributions will either be made in a lump-sum payment or in up to five consecutive installments as elected by the director. The Deferred Fee Plan was amended and restated generally effective as of January 1, 2009 to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and to make certain other desired changes to the Plan. Pursuant to the restatement, participants were given the right to make an irrevocable election on or before December 1, 2008 to receive a lump sum distribution of the Director’s deferred cash account and the vested portion of the Director’s deferred stock account, on or about April 1, 2009, and to receive lump sum distributions of the non-vested portions, if any, of the Director’s deferred stock account on the later of April 1, 2009 or the dates in which the deferred stock account would vest based upon the vesting schedule for each respective portion of the stock account.

 

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors for services rendered in 2009.

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate number of unvested stock awards and the aggregate number of stock option awards (both exercisable and unexercisable) for non-employee directors were as follows:

 

 

Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

 

The following report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of MasTec’s filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

 

In fulfilling our role, we met and held discussions with MasTec’s management and reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A. Based on the review and discussions with management and our business judgment, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

 

Jose S. Sorzano

 

Frank E. Jaumot

 

Robert J. Dwyer

 

Julia Johnson

 

John Van Heuvelen

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

 

Principal Shareholders

 

The following table provides information concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of March 19, 2010, by:

 

 

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by footnote and subject to community property laws where applicable, to our knowledge the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options and warrants held by that person that are exercisable as of March 19, 2010 or that will become exercisable within 60 days thereafter are deemed outstanding for purposes of that person’s percentage ownership but not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the mailing address of each individual is c/o MasTec, Inc., 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. The following information is based upon information provided to us or filed with the Commission by the shareholders.

 

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and regulations of the SEC thereunder require that MasTec’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of MasTec’s common stock, as well as certain affiliates of such persons, file initial reports of their ownership of MasTec’s common stock and subsequent reports of changes in such ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and persons owning more than 10% of MasTec’s common stock are required by SEC regulations to file with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange reports of their respective ownership of common stock and to furnish MasTec with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports received, MasTec believes that during the year ended December 31, 2009, directors, executive officers and owners of more than 10% of the common stock timely complied with all applicable filing requirements.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

 

The Audit Committee Charter requires the Audit Committee to review and approve all transactions in which we are a participant and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In March 2007, the Audit Committee formally adopted standards to apply when it reviews, approves or ratifies any such related party transaction. These standards provide that (i) all related party transactions must be fair and reasonable to us at the time they are authorized by the Audit Committee and (ii) all related party transactions must be authorized, approved or ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Audit Committee who have no interest, either directly or indirectly, in any such related party transaction.

 

Related Person Transactions

 

MasTec purchases, rents and leases equipment used in its business from a number of different vendors, on a non-exclusive basis, including Neff Corp. (“Neff”), in which Jorge Mas, Chairman of MasTec’s Board of Directors, and Jose Mas, MasTec’s Chief Executive Officer, were directors and owners of a controlling interest through June 4, 2005. Juan Carlos Mas, the brother of Jorge and Jose Mas, was the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, a director and a shareholder of Neff until May 31, 2007 when he sold his Neff shares and resigned as its chief executive officer. Juan Carlos Mas remains as chairman of the Neff Board of Directors. During the year ended December 31, 2009, MasTec paid Neff approximately $0.9 million for equipment purchases, rentals and leases. MasTec believes the amount paid to Neff is equivalent to the payments that would have been made between unrelated parties for similar transactions acting at arm’s length.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2009, MasTec paid $48,000 to Irma S. Mas, the mother of Jorge Mas and Jose Mas, for the lease of certain property located in Florida.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2009, MasTec had an arrangement with a customer whereby MasTec leased employees to that customer and charged approximately $426,000 to the customer. We also have an agreement with the customer whereby we provide satellite communication services. During the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues relating to this customer were approximately $887,000. Jorge Mas and Jose Mas are minority owners of this customer.

 

We charter aircraft from a third party who leases two of its aircraft from entities in which Jorge Mas and Jose Mas have an ownership interest. We paid this unrelated chartering company approximately $475,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Effective as of August 27, 2002, MasTec and Jorge Mas entered into a split dollar agreement, as subsequently amended, wherein MasTec agreed to pay the premiums due on two life insurance policies with an aggregate face amount of $50 million. Mr. Mas and his spouse were the insured under the policies. Under the terms of this agreement, MasTec was the sole owner and beneficiary of the policies and was entitled to recover the greater of (i) all premiums it pays on the policies plus interest equal to four percent, compounded annually, or (ii) the aggregate cash value of the life insurance policy immediately before the death of the insured’s. The remainder of the policies’ proceeds was to be paid in accordance with Mr. Mas’ designations. MasTec was to make the premium payments until the agreement was terminated, which was to occur upon any of the following events: (i) bankruptcy, or dissolution of MasTec, or (ii) a change of control of MasTec.

 

Additionally, effective as of September 13, 2002, MasTec and Jorge Mas entered into a second split dollar agreement, as subsequently amended, wherein we agreed to pay the premiums due on a life insurance policy with a face amount of $80 million, $60 million of which was subject to the agreement and the remaining $20 million was deemed to be key-man insurance payable to MasTec and fell outside of the agreement. Jorge Mas was the insured under this policy. Under the terms of this agreement, MasTec was the sole owner and beneficiary of the policy and was entitled to recover the greater of (i) all premiums it paid on the portion of the policy subject to the agreement, plus interest equal to four percent, compounded annually, or (ii) the aggregate cash value of the life insurance policy immediately before the death of the insured. We were to make the premium payments until the agreement was terminated, which would occur upon any of the following events: (i) bankruptcy, or dissolution of MasTec, or (ii) a

change of control of MasTec. An amount equal to $60 million of the policy’s proceeds would be paid in accordance with Jorge Mas’ designations. Any remainder of the proceeds would be paid to us. In 2009, we paid approximately $0.6 million in premiums in connection with the split dollar agreements for Jorge Mas.

 

On November 1, 2002, MasTec and Jorge Mas entered into a deferred bonus agreement in which we agreed to pay Mr. Mas a bonus in the event that the split dollar agreements Mr. Mas had entered into with MasTec were terminated due to a change of control of MasTec. The amount of the bonus was equal to the total premiums paid by MasTec under the terms of the split dollar agreements, plus interest of four percent, compounded annually. The bonus was to be paid within 60 days after termination of the split dollar agreement. The deferred bonus agreement was subsequently amended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

On October 28, 2009, the three split dollar agreements between Jorge Mas and us were restated into a single agreement and the deferred bonus agreements between Jorge Mas and us was amended and restated in its entirety. Under the amended and restated split dollar agreement, MasTec remains the sole owner and beneficiary of each of the policies subject to the agreement and upon the death of the insured or insured’s under the applicable policy, MasTec is entitled to receive a portion of the death benefit under such policy equal to the greater of (i) all premiums paid by us on such policy or (ii) the then cash value of such policy immediately before the death of the insured or insured’s, excluding surrender charges. Upon termination of the agreement, Jorge Mas, or in the case of a second to die policy, the second to die of Jorge Mas and his wife, have an option to purchase each policy subject to the agreement for a purchase price equal to the greater of those two amounts. Additionally, the designation of a portion of the policy as key-man insurance was removed, and therefore the entire policy is now subject to the split dollar agreement. The total maximum face amount of the insurance for all policies subject to the split dollar agreement was capped at $200 million. The amount of the deferred bonus under the amended and restated deferred bonus agreement is equal to the sum of the following amounts determined with respect to each policy subject to the split dollar agreement: the greater of (i) the total premiums paid by MasTec under such policy or (ii) the then cash value of such policy immediately prior to the change in control, excluding surrender charges. All other material provisions of the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements remain unchanged.

 

Effective as of August 3, 2004, MasTec and Jose Mas entered into a split dollar agreement wherein we agreed to pay premiums on a life insurance policy with an aggregate face amount of $11 million. Under the terms of the agreement, MasTec was the sole owner and beneficiary of the policy and was entitled to recover the greater of (i) all premiums it paid on the policy plus interest equal to four percent, compounded annually, or (ii) the aggregate cash value of the life insurance policy immediately prior to the death of the survivor of the insured. The remainders of the policy’s proceeds were to be paid in accordance with Jose Mas’ designations. MasTec was to make the premium payments until the agreement was terminated, which was to occur upon any of the following events: (i) bankruptcy, or dissolution of MasTec, or (ii) a change of control of MasTec. As of December 31, 2009, the policy’s premiums have been paid in full. In 2009, we paid approximately $150,000 in premiums in connection with the split dollar agreement for Jose Mas.

 

On April 3, 2007, MasTec and Jose Mas entered into a deferred bonus agreement in which MasTec agreed to pay Jose Mas a bonus in the event the split dollar agreement Mr. Mas had entered into with MasTec was terminated due to a change of control. The amount of the bonus was equal to the total premium payments made by MasTec under the terms of the split dollar agreements, plus interest of four percent, compounded annually. The bonus was to be paid within 60 days after termination of the split dollar agreement.

 

On October 28, 2009, the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements between Jose Mas and us were amended and restated in their entirety. The amended and restated split dollar agreement provides that one or more life insurance policies may be subject to the agreement. At this time, however, the only policy subject to the agreement is the one acquired pursuant to the original agreement. MasTec remains the sole owner and beneficiary of any policy subject to the agreement, and upon the death of the insured, MasTec is entitled to receive a portion of the death benefit equal to the greater of (i) all premiums paid by us on such policy or (ii) the then cash value of such policy immediately before the death of the insured, excluding surrender charges. Upon termination of the agreement, Jose Mas has an option to purchase each policy subject to the agreement for a purchase price equal to the greater of those two amounts. The amount of the deferred bonus under the amended and restated deferred bonus agreement that is payable upon termination of the split dollar agreement is equal to the sum of the following amounts determined with respect to

each policy subject to the split dollar agreement: the greater of (i) the total premiums paid by MasTec under the terms of such policy or (ii) the then cash value of such policy immediately prior to the change in control, excluding surrender charges. All other material provisions of the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements remain unchanged.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE AND AUDIT RELATED INFORMATION

 

Audit Committee Report

 

The agenda of the Audit Committee is established by the Chairman of the Audit Committee. During 2009, at each of its meetings, the Audit Committee met with senior members of the financial management team. Members of the Audit Committee had private executive sessions, as appropriate, at its meetings, with MasTec’s independent registered public accounting firm for the purpose of discussing financial management, accounting and internal control issues.

 

The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be reviewed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees), as amended, and received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent auditors their independence from MasTec. In connection with discussions regarding independence, the Audit Committee also considered with the independent auditors whether the provision of non-audit services by independent auditors to MasTec is compatible with the auditors’ independence.

 

The Audit Committee has reviewed the audited financial statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 with our management, including a discussion of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of judgments and estimates, the clarity of disclosure in the financial statements and the conformity of the consolidated financial statements of MasTec with generally accepted accounting principles. In performing its functions, the Audit Committee acts in an oversight capacity. The Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of MasTec’s management, which has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and reports, and of the independent registered public accounting firm, who, in their report, express an opinion on the conformity of our annual financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles. In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the report of the independent auditors, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors has approved, the audited financial statements included in MasTec’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Frank E. Jaumot, Chairman
Ernst N. Csiszar
John Van Heuvenlen

 

Independent Public Accountants

 

Our Audit Committee engaged BDO Seidman, LLP to serve as our independent registered public accountants for the 2009 fiscal year. A representative from BDO Seidman, LLP is expected to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and will have the opportunity to make a statement and answer questions.

 

Audit Fees

 

Fees for services rendered by our independent auditors, BDO Seidman, LLP, for professional services rendered for the 2008 and 2009 audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q in 2008 and 2009, out of pocket expenses, procedures performed for a registration statement filing and other audit procedures related to SEC comment letters totaled approximately $2.2 million and $2.4 million for 2008 and 2009, respectively.

Audit Related Fees

 

Fees for audit related services, which are services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of quarterly financial statements, performed by BDO Seidman, LLP were $237,000 and $67,800 in 2008 and 2009, respectively.

 

Fees billed for tax services, including compliance, tax advice and tax planning, performed by BDO Seidman, LLP in 2008 and 2009 were $6,000 and $0 respectively.

 

All Other Fees

 

There were no fees billed for other services in 2008 and 2009 by BDO Seidman, LLP.

 

Pre-approval Policies

 

The Audit Committee pre-approves all auditing services and the terms of such services (which may include providing comfort letters in connection with securities underwritings) and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors, but only to the extent that the non-audit services are not prohibited under applicable law and the Audit Committee reasonably determines that the non-audit services do not impair the independence of the independent auditors. The authority to pre-approve non-audit services may be delegated to one or more members of the Audit Committee, who present all decisions to pre-approve an activity to the full Audit Committee at its first meeting following such decision.

 

The pre-approval requirement is waived with respect to the provision of non-audit services for MasTec if (i) the aggregate amount of all such non-audit services provided to MasTec constitutes not more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid by MasTec to its independent auditors during the fiscal year in which such non-audit services were provided, (ii) such services were not recognized at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services, and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee or by one or more of its members to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee.

 

The Audit Committee has considered and determined that the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence.

 

During 2008 and 2009, audit related services, tax services, and all other services to be provided by BDO Seidman, LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

 

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

The Audit Committee has selected and appointed the firm of BDO Seidman LLP to act as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2010 fiscal year. BDO Seidman LLP was our independent auditor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board of Directors is submitting the appointment of BDO Seidman LLP to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will re-evaluate its appointment, taking into consideration our shareholders’ vote. However, the Audit Committee is solely responsible for the appointment and termination of our auditors and may do so at any time in its discretion.

 

Proxies will be voted “FOR” ratification of the appointment of BDO Seidman LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2010 fiscal year absent contrary instructions.

 

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment of BDO Seidman LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2010 fiscal year.

 

OTHER BUSINESS

 

Advance Notice Procedures and Shareholders’ Proposals for 2011 Annual Meeting

 

Under our bylaws, no business, may be brought before an annual meeting unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before an annual meeting by or at the direction of our Board of Directors or, in the case of business other than director nominations, by a shareholder entitled to vote who has delivered written notice as specified by our bylaws. Under our bylaws, MasTec must receive any eligible proposal from an eligible shareholder intended to be presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on or before December 10, 2010 for the proposal to be properly brought before the meeting. This same deadline also applies for any shareholder proposal to be eligible for inclusion in our Proxy Statement and Proxy related to that meeting. Any notice regarding any shareholder proposal must include the information specified in Article I, Section 9 of our bylaws. If a shareholder fails to comply with Article I, Section 9 of our bylaws or notifies MasTec after December 10, 2010 of an intent to present any proposal at MasTec’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, irrespective of whether the shareholder is seeking to include the proposal in the Company’s Proxy Statement and Proxy, the proposal will not be considered properly brought before the meeting. A copy of our bylaw requirements will be provided upon written request to: MasTec Legal Department, 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida, 33134.

 

Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (without exhibits or documents incorporated by reference therein), are available without charge to shareholders upon written request to MasTec Legal Department, 800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, Coral Gables, Florida, 33134, by calling (305) 599-1800 or via the Internet at www.mastec .com.

 

Other Matters that May Come Before the Annual Meeting

 

The Board of Directors does not intend to present, and knows of no others who intend to present, at the Annual Meeting any matter or business other than that set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote any proxies on such matters in accordance with their judgment.

 

We request that you promptly request a proxy card to sign, date, and return or vote your proxy over the telephone or through the Internet so that your vote will be included at the meeting.

 

 

 

Alberto de Cardenas, Secretary

Coral Gables, Florida

April 9, 2010