800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800

Mail Stop J09N05

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

612 303-6000

 

March 17, 2010

 

Dear Shareholders:

 

You are cordially invited to join us for our 2010 annual meeting of shareholders, which will be held on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, at 2:30 p.m., Central Time, in the Huber Room on the 12th floor of our Minneapolis headquarters in the U.S. Bancorp Center, 800 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the proxy statement that follow describe the business to be conducted at the meeting.

 

We are pleased to inform you that, for the second consecutive year, we are furnishing our proxy materials to you over the Internet, which will reduce our costs and the environmental impact of our annual meeting. Accordingly, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to you, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report and vote online. The Notice of Availability also contains instructions on how to request a printed set of proxy materials.

 

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, your vote is important and we encourage you to vote your shares promptly. You may vote your shares using a toll-free telephone number or the Internet. If you received a paper copy of the proxy card by mail, you may sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided. Instructions regarding the three methods of voting are contained on the Notice of Availability and the proxy card.

 

We look forward to seeing you at the annual meeting.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Andrew S. Duff

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800

Mail Stop J09N05

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

612 303-6000

 

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
the Annual Meeting to be held on May 5, 2010

 

Our proxy statement and 2009 annual report are available at www.piperjaffray.com/proxymaterials

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

James L. Chosy

Secretary

 

March 17, 2010

 

PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

TO BE HELD MAY 5, 2010

 

The Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray Companies is soliciting proxies for use at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 5, 2010, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report online, is first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 17, 2010.

 

At our annual meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and management will report on matters of current interest to our shareholders and respond to questions from our shareholders. The matters outlined in the notice include the election of directors and the ratification of the selection of our independent auditor for 2010.

 

The Board has set March 9, 2010 as the record date for the annual meeting. If you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 9, 2010, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. As of the record date, 20,771,803 shares of common stock, representing all of our voting stock, were issued and outstanding and, therefore, eligible to vote at the meeting.

 

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Therefore, a total of 20,771,803 votes are entitled to be cast at the meeting. There is no cumulative voting.

 

In accordance with our bylaws, shares equal to a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors as of the record date must be present at the annual meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Shares are counted as present at the meeting if:

 

 

It is your designation of another person to vote stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy, you also may direct the proxy how to vote your shares. We refer to this as your “proxy vote.” Two executive officers have been designated as proxies for our 2010 annual meeting of shareholders. These executive officers are James L. Chosy and Debbra L. Schoneman.

 

It is a document that we are required to make available to you by Internet or, if you request, by mail in accordance with regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, when we ask you to designate proxies to vote your shares of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock at a meeting of our

shareholders. The proxy statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the meeting and certain other information required by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

 

As permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet, which reduces our costs and the environmental impact of our annual meeting. Accordingly, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our shareholders of record and beneficial owners who have not previously requested a printed set of proxy materials. The Notice of Availability contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report and vote online, as well as instructions on how to request a printed set of proxy materials.

 

To get electronic access to the proxy materials, you will need your control number, which was provided to you in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card included in your printed set of proxy materials. Once you have your control number, you may either go to www.proxyvote.com and enter your control number when prompted, or send an e-mail requesting electronic delivery of the materials to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

 

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, while you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares. In that case, your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares using the method described below under “How do I submit my proxy?”

 

If you are a shareholder of record, you can submit a proxy to be voted at the meeting in any of the following ways:

 

 

To vote by telephone or Internet, you will need to use a control number that was provided to you by our vote tabulator, Broadridge Financial Solutions, and then follow the additional steps when prompted. The steps have been designed to authenticate your identity, allow you to give voting instructions, and confirm that those instructions have been recorded properly. If you hold your shares in street name, you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker, bank, trust or other nominee, which is similar to the voting procedures for shareholders of record. However, if you request the proxy materials by mail after receiving a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee, you will receive a voting instruction form (not a proxy card) to use in directing the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares.

 

If you hold shares of Piper Jaffray common stock in the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan or U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, the submission of your proxy by Internet or telephone or your completed proxy card will serve as voting instructions to the respective plan’s trustee. Your voting instructions must be received at least five days prior to the annual meeting in order to count. In accordance with the terms of the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan and U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, the trustee of each plan will vote all of the shares held in the plan in the same proportion as the actual proxy votes submitted by plan participants at least five days prior to the annual meeting.

 

If you receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or printed set of proxy materials, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, vote once for each control number you receive as described above under “How do I submit my proxy?”

 

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting by completing a ballot at the meeting. Even if you currently plan to attend the meeting, we recommend that you submit your proxy as described above so your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting. If you submit your vote by proxy and later decide to vote in person at the annual meeting, the vote you submit at the meeting will override your proxy vote.

 

If you are a street name holder, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting only if you obtain and bring to the meeting a signed letter or other form of proxy from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

 

If you are a participant in the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan or U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, you may submit voting instructions as described above, but you may not vote your Piper Jaffray shares held in the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan or U.S. Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan in person at the meeting.

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote:

 

 

If you are a shareholder of record and submit a signed proxy card or submit your proxy by Internet or telephone but do not specify how you want to vote your shares on a particular matter, we will vote your shares as follows:

 

 

Your vote is important. We urge you to vote, or to instruct your broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote, on all matters before the annual meeting. If you are a street name holder and fail to instruct the shareholder of record how you want to vote your shares on a particular matter, those

shares are considered to be “uninstructed.” New York Stock Exchange rules determine the circumstances under which member brokers of the New York Stock Exchange may exercise discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares held by them on behalf of their clients who are street name holders. With respect to the election of the nominees for director, the rules do not permit member brokers to exercise voting discretion as to the uninstructed shares. The 2010 annual meeting of shareholders will be our first annual meeting at which member brokers will not be permitted to exercise voting discretion for the election of directors due to a recent amendment to the New York Stock Exchange rules. With respect to the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young as our independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2010, the rules permit member brokers (other than our broker-dealer subsidiary, Piper Jaffray & Co.) to exercise voting discretion as to the uninstructed shares. For matters with respect to which the broker, bank or other nominee does not have voting discretion or has, but does not exercise, voting discretion, the uninstructed shares will be referred to as a “broker non-vote.” For more information regarding the effect of broker non-votes on the outcome of the vote, see below under “How are votes counted?”

 

Our broker-dealer subsidiary, Piper Jaffray & Co., is a member broker of the New York Stock Exchange and may be a shareholder of record with respect to shares of our common stock held in street name on behalf of Piper Jaffray & Co. clients. Because Piper Jaffray & Co. is our affiliate, New York Stock Exchange rules prohibit Piper Jaffray & Co. from voting uninstructed shares even on routine matters. Instead, Piper Jaffray & Co. may vote uninstructed shares on such matters only in the same proportion as the shares represented by the votes cast by all shareholders of record with respect to such matters.

 

Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting, in any of the following ways:

 

 

The nine director nominees who receive the most votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy will be elected. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to ratify the selection of our independent auditor.

 

You may either vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each director nominee. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the other proposal. If you properly submit your proxy but withhold authority to vote for one or more director nominees or abstain from voting on the other proposal, your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum and for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular matter(s) with respect to which you abstained from voting or withheld authority to vote. If you do not submit your proxy or voting instructions and also do not vote by ballot at the annual meeting, your shares will not be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum unless you hold your shares in street name and the broker, bank, trust or other nominee has discretion to vote your shares and does so. For

more information regarding discretionary voting, see the information above under “What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?”

 

If you withhold authority to vote for one or more of the director nominees or you do not vote your shares on this matter (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise), this will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. With respect to the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor, if you abstain from voting, doing so will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, but if you do not vote your shares (or, for shares held in street name, if you do not submit voting instructions and your broker, bank, trust or other nominee does not or may not vote your shares), this will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

 

All of our shareholders are invited to attend the annual meeting. You may be asked to present valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted to the meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, you also may be asked to present proof of ownership to be admitted to the meeting. A brokerage statement or letter from your broker, bank, trust or other nominee are examples of proof of ownership. To help us plan for the meeting, please let us know whether you expect to attend, by responding affirmatively when prompted during Internet or telephone voting or by marking the attendance box on the proxy card.

 

Piper Jaffray pays for the cost of proxy preparation and solicitation, including the reasonable charges and expenses of brokerage firms, banks, trusts or other nominees for forwarding proxy materials to street name holders. We are soliciting proxies primarily by mail. In addition, our directors, officers and regular employees may solicit proxies personally, telephonically, electronically or by other means of communication. Our directors, officers and regular employees will receive no additional compensation for their services other than their regular compensation.

 

The number of directors currently serving on our Board of Directors is nine. At the 2010 annual meeting, our shareholders will be asked to vote to elect the entire Board.

 

Andrew S. Duff, Michael R. Francis, Virginia Gambale, B. Kristine Johnson, Addison L. Piper, Lisa K. Polsky, Frank L. Sims, Jean M. Taylor and Michele Volpi have been nominated for reelection to the Board to serve until our 2011 annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected. The nine nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting in person or by proxy will be elected. Proxies may not be voted for more than nine directors. If, for any reason, any nominee becomes unable to serve before the annual meeting occurs, the persons named as proxies may vote your shares for a substitute nominee selected by our Board of Directors.

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the nine director nominees. Proxies will be voted FOR the election of the nine nominees unless otherwise specified.

 

Following is biographical information for each of the nominees for election as a director.

 

 

ANDREW S. DUFF:  Age 52, chairman and chief executive officer since December 31, 2003. Mr. Duff became chairman and chief executive officer of Piper Jaffray Companies following completion of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on December 31, 2003. He has served as chairman of our broker-dealer subsidiary since 2003, as chief executive officer of our broker-dealer subsidiary since 2000 and as president of our broker-dealer subsidiary since 1996. He has been with Piper Jaffray since 1980. Prior to the spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, Mr. Duff also was a vice chairman of U.S. Bancorp from 1999 through 2003.

MICHAEL R. FRANCIS:  Age 47, director since December 31, 2003. Mr. Francis is executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Target Corporation, a position he has held since August 2008. Target Corporation operates Target-brand general merchandise discount stores and an online business, Target.com. Mr. Francis began his career with Marshall Field’s department stores in 1985 and has been with Target Corporation since its acquisition of Marshall Field’s in 1990. He previously served Target Corporation as executive vice president, marketing from 2003 until August 2008, senior vice president, marketing from 2001 to 2003, and as senior vice president, marketing and visual presentation of the department store division from 1995 to 2001. Prior to that, he held a variety of positions within Target Corporation. Mr. Francis served as a director of Lenox Group, Inc. (formerly known as Department 56, Inc.), a publicly traded company, from July 2001 through September 2005.

 

VIRGINIA GAMBALE:  Age 50, director since September 22, 2009. Ms. Gambale has been a managing partner of Azimuth Partners LLC since she founded the company in 2003. Azimuth Partners operates globally as an investor and advisor, developing growth strategies and business partnerships, and orchestrating exits for technology and business service companies. Prior to founding Azimuth Partners, Ms. Gambale was a partner at Deutsche Bank Capital and ABS Ventures from 1999 to 2003. She has held the position of chief information officer at both Merrill Lynch and at Bankers Trust Alex. Brown, where she also served on the management committee. Ms. Gambale is a member of the board of directors of JetBlue Airways Corporation, and within the past five years has served as a director of Motive, Inc., while Motive was a publicly traded company.

 

B. KRISTINE JOHNSON: Age 58, director since December 31, 2003. Since 2000, Ms. Johnson has been president of Affinity Capital Management, a Minneapolis-based venture capital firm that invests primarily in seed and early-stage health care companies in the United States. Ms. Johnson served as a consultant to Affinity Capital Management in 1999. Prior to that, she was employed for 17 years at Medtronic, Inc., a manufacturer of cardiac pacemakers, neurological and spinal devices and other medical products, serving most recently as senior vice president and chief administrative officer from 1998 to 1999. Her experience at Medtronic also included service as president of the vascular business and president of the tachyarrhythmia management business, among other roles. Ms. Johnson served as director of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. from 1990 through 2006.

 

ADDISON L. PIPER:  Age 63, director since December 31, 2003. Mr. Piper retired from Piper Jaffray effective at the end of 2006, having served as vice chairman of Piper Jaffray Companies since the completion of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on December 31, 2003. He worked for Piper Jaffray from 1969 through 2006, serving as assistant equity syndicate manager, director of securities trading and director of sales and marketing. He served as chief executive officer from 1983 to 2000 and as chairman from 1988 to 2003. From 1998 through August 11, 2006, Mr. Piper had responsibility for our venture and private capital fund activities. Mr. Piper also is a member of the board of directors of Renaissance Learning Corporation.

 

LISA K. POLSKY:  Age 53, director since May 2, 2007. In February 2009, Ms. Polsky joined Jane Street Capital, LLC, a New York-based quantitative proprietary trading firm. From March 2008 until joining Jane Street Capital, she served as partner and head of global investment solutions for Duff Capital Advisors, which provided portfolio solutions to funding liabilities and fulfilling investment needs, particularly in the retirement space. She previously served as the president of Polsky Partners, a New York-based consulting firm specializing in hedge fund allocation, risk management and valuation policy, which she founded in 2002. Ms. Polsky also has served as managing director, head of client financing services and head of leveraged client channel with Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. from 2000 to 2002, and as managing director, chief risk officer, head of risk policy, chief derivative strategist and head of product development at Morgan Stanley DW Inc. from 1996 to 2000.

 

FRANK L. SIMS:  Age 59, director since December 31, 2003. Mr. Sims retired from Cargill, Inc. effective at the end of 2007, having served as corporate vice president, transportation and product assurance and a member of the management corporate center since July 2000. Cargill is a marketer and distributor of agricultural and industrial products and services. Mr. Sims had responsibility for global

transportation and supply chain solutions and served as a member of the risk management and financial solutions platform. He joined Cargill in 1972 and served in a number of executive positions, including president of Cargill’s North American Grain Division from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Sims is a member of the board of directors of PolyMet Mining Corp., and he served as a member of the board of directors of Tennant Company from 1999 through 2007.

 

JEAN M. TAYLOR:  Age 47, director since July 27, 2005. Ms. Taylor is the president and chief executive officer of Taylor Corporation, positions she has held since 2001 and 2007, respectively. Taylor Corporation is a privately held group of approximately 80 affiliated entrepreneurial companies engaged in marketing, fulfillment, personalization and printing services. These businesses operate throughout North America, Europe and Australia and together employ more than 15,000 employees. Ms. Taylor joined Taylor Corporation in 1994 as vice president and served as executive vice president from 1999 to 2001.

 

MICHELE VOLPI:  Age 46, director since February 3, 2010. Mr. Volpi is the president and chief executive officer of H.B. Fuller Company, a position he has held since December 2006. H.B. Fuller and its subsidiaries manufacture and market adhesives and specialty chemical products worldwide. Prior to becoming president and chief executive officer, he was group president, general manager of the global adhesives division of H.B. Fuller from December 2004 to December 2006. Prior to that position, he served as global strategic business unit manager, assembly for H.B. Fuller from June 2002 to December 2004. From 1999 to June 2002, Mr. Volpi served as general manager, marketing for General Electric Company. Mr. Volpi is also a member of the board of directors of H.B. Fuller.

 

Each nominee brings unique capabilities to the Board. The Board believes the nominees as a group have the experience and skills in areas such as general business management, corporate governance, leadership development, investment banking, finance and risk management that are necessary to effectively oversee our company. In addition, the Board believes that each of our directors possesses high standards of ethics, integrity and professionalism, sound judgment, community leadership and a commitment to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. The following is information as to why each nominee should serve as a director of our company:

 

 

 

The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of the Board and the following standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance. Each of the standing committees has adopted and operates under a written charter, all of which are available on our website at www.piperjaffray.com. Other corporate governance documents available on our website include our Corporate Governance Principles, Director Independence Standards, Director Nominee Selection Policy, Procedures for Contacting the Board of Directors, Codes of Ethics and Business Conduct, and Complaint Procedures Regarding Accounting and Auditing Matters.

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other employees performing similar functions, and a separate Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our directors. Directors who also serve as officers of Piper Jaffray must comply with both codes. Both codes are available on our website at www.piperjaffray.com. We will post on our website at

www.piperjaffray.com or file a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission disclosing any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of either of our Codes of Ethics and Business Conduct within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

 

Under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange, a majority of the members of our Board of Directors must be independent, and no director qualifies as independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Piper Jaffray. To assist the Board with these determinations, the Board has adopted Director Independence Standards, which are available on our website at www.piperjaffray.com.

 

The Board has affirmatively determined, in accordance with our Director Independence Standards, that other than Mr. Piper (a former executive officer) none of our non-employee directors has a material relationship with Piper Jaffray and that each of them is independent. Also, Samuel L. Kaplan, who resigned from the Board effective September 24, 2009 in connection with his appointment as U.S. Ambassador to Morocco, was independent during the time he served as a director in 2009. As of March 1, 2010, Mr. Piper became eligible to be determined to be independent because three years had passed since he retired from his officer position with Piper Jaffray and since he received more than $120,000 in direct compensation from us during a twelve-month period (other than compensation for his service as a director). The Board intends to review Mr. Piper’s independence in light of this development during 2010.

 

When determining the independence of our independent directors, the Board considered the following types of transactions or arrangements: (i) with respect to Messrs. Francis, Ms. Johnson, Ms. Taylor and Ms. Polsky, the Board considered commercial relationships between Piper Jaffray and companies with which each of those directors is associated or an immediate family member of the director is associated that are deemed to be immaterial under our Director Independence Standards; (ii) with respect to Messrs. Francis and Sims and Ms. Johnson and Ms. Taylor, the Board considered relationships between Piper Jaffray and charitable foundations or other non-profit organizations with which each of those directors or an immediate family member of the director is associated and that are deemed to be immaterial under our Director Independence Standards; and (iii) with respect to Ms. Johnson, the Board considered our employment of one of her relatives and determined the relationship to be immaterial given the nature of the family relationship and the position involved.

 

Mr. Duff cannot be considered an independent director under New York Stock Exchange corporate governance rules because he is employed as our chief executive officer.

 

Since our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, Mr. Duff has served in the combined roles of chairman and chief executive officer. In 2006, the Board appointed Samuel L. Kaplan to serve as the lead director of the Board, a position he held until he resigned from the Board in 2009. Mr. Francis currently serves as the lead director. The lead director has the following duties and responsibilities, as described in our Corporate Governance Principles:

 

 

 

We believe that Mr. Duff’s combined service as chairman and chief executive officer creates unified leadership for the Board and the company, with one cohesive vision for our organization. This leadership structure, which is common among U.S.-based publicly traded companies, demonstrates to our clients, employees and shareholders that the company is under strong leadership. As chairman and chief executive officer, Mr. Duff helps shape the strategy ultimately set by the entire Board and also leverages his operational experience to balance growth and risk management. We believe the oversight provided by the Board’s independent directors, the work of the Board’s committees described below and the coordination between the chief executive officer and the independent directors conducted by the lead director help provide effective oversight of our company’s strategic plans and operations. We believe having one person serve as chairman and chief executive officer is in the best interests of our company and our shareholders at this time.

 

The company’s management is responsible for defining the various risks facing the company, formulating risk management policies and procedures, and managing the company’s risk exposures on a day-to-day basis. The Board’s responsibility is to monitor the company’s risk management processes by informing itself concerning the company’s material risks and evaluating whether management has reasonable controls in place to address the material risks; the Board is not responsible, however, for defining or managing the company’s various risks. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is primarily responsible for monitoring management’s responsibility in the area of risk oversight, and risk management is a factor the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee consider when determining which directors serve on the Audit Committee. Accordingly, management regularly reported to the Audit Committee on risk management during 2009. The Audit Committee, in turn, reports on the matters discussed at the committee level to the full Board. The Audit Committee and the full Board focus on the material risks facing the company, including operational, market, credit, liquidity, legal and regulatory risks, to assess whether management has reasonable controls in place to address these risks. In addition, the Compensation Committee is charged with reviewing and discussing with management whether the company’s compensation arrangements are consistent with effective controls and sound risk management. The Board believes this division of responsibilities provides an effective and efficient approach for addressing risk management.

 

At both the Board and committee levels, our non-employee directors meet regularly in executive sessions in which Mr. Duff and other members of management do not participate. Mr. Francis, our lead director, serves as the presiding director at executive sessions of the Board, and the chairperson of each committee serves as the presiding director at executive sessions of that committee. At least once annually, our independent directors meet in an executive session without the directors who are not independent under New York Stock Exchange Rules.

 

We have three standing committees of the Board: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. The table below shows the membership of these committees (Mr. Volpi’s service on the Compensation Committee commences May 5, 2010):

 

 

The Audit Committee’s purpose is to oversee the integrity of our financial statements, the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditor, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate the independent auditor and is directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As discussed above, the Audit Committee is primarily responsible for monitoring management’s responsibility in the area of risk oversight. The Audit Committee also meets with management and the independent auditor to review and discuss the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, reviews the integrity of our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements, and prepares the Audit Committee Report included in the proxy statement.

 

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are more fully described in the Committee’s charter. The Audit Committee met ten times during 2009. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent (as that term is defined in the applicable New York Stock Exchange rules and in regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission), that all members are financially literate and have the accounting or related financial expertise required by the New York Stock Exchange rules, and that each of Mr. Sims and Ms. Polsky is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The Compensation Committee discharges the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the executive officers, oversees succession planning for the executive officers jointly with the Nominating and Governance Committee and ensures that our compensation and employee benefit programs are aligned with our compensation and benefits philosophy. These responsibilities also include reviewing and discussing with management whether the company’s compensation arrangements are consistent with effective controls and sound risk management. The Committee has full discretion to determine the amount of compensation to be paid to the executive officers. The Committee also has sole authority to evaluate the chief executive officer’s performance and determine the compensation of the chief executive officer based on this evaluation. The Committee is responsible for recommending stock ownership guidelines for the executive officers and directors, for recommending the compensation and benefits to be provided to our non-employee directors, for reviewing and approving the establishment of broad-based incentive compensation, equity-based, retirement or other material employee benefit plans, and for discharging any duties under the terms of these plans.

 

The Committee has delegated authority to our chief executive officer under our 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) to allocate awards to employees (other than our

executive officers) in connection with our annual equity grants made in the first quarter of each year. The annual equity grants are part of the payment of incentive compensation for the preceding year. Under this delegated authority, the Committee approves the aggregate amount of equity to be awarded to all employees other than executive officers, and the chief executive officer approves the award recipients and specific amount of equity to be granted to each recipient. All other terms of the awards are determined by the Committee. The Committee also has delegated authority to the chief executive officer to grant equity awards to employees other than executive officers in connection with recruiting, retention and significant promotions. This delegation permits the chief executive officer to determine the recipient of the award as well the type and amount of the award, subject to an annual share limitation set by the Committee each year. All awards granted pursuant to this delegated authority must be made in accordance with our equity grant timing policy described below in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Grant Timing Policy.” All other terms of the awards are determined by the Committee.

 

The work of the Committee is supported by our chief administrative officer and our Human Resources department. These personnel work closely with the chief executive officer and, as appropriate, the chief financial and accounting officers and the general counsel, to prepare and present information and recommendations for review and consideration by the Committee, as described below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Setting Compensation — Involvement of Executive Officers.”

 

In 2009, the Compensation Committee engaged an independent outside compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, to provide peer group analyses, competitive assessments, program design recommendations and advice to the Committee, as described below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Setting Compensation — Compensation Consultant.”

 

The Committee reviews and discusses with management the disclosures regarding executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement, and recommends to the Board inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our annual proxy statement. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are more fully described in the Committee’s charter. For more information regarding the Committee’s process in setting compensation, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Setting Compensation” below. The Compensation Committee met seven times during 2009. The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent (as that term is defined in applicable New York Stock Exchange rules).

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors and recommends to the Board sound corporate governance principles and practices for Piper Jaffray. In particular, the Committee assesses the independence of our Board members, identifies and evaluates candidates for nomination as directors, responds to director nominations submitted by shareholders, recommends the slate of director nominees for election at the annual meeting of shareholders and candidates to fill vacancies between annual meetings, recommends qualified members of the Board for membership on committees, oversees the director orientation and continuing education programs, reviews the Board’s committee structure, reviews and assesses the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Principles, evaluates the annual evaluation process for the chief executive officer, the Board and Board committees, and oversees the succession planning process for the executive officers jointly with the Compensation Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee also oversees administration of our related person transaction policy and reviews the transactions submitted to it pursuant to such policy. The responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee are more fully described in the Committee’s charter. The Nominating and Governance Committee met four times during 2009. The Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent (as that term is defined in applicable New York Stock Exchange rules).

 

Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that our directors are expected to attend meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they serve, as well as our annual meeting of shareholders. Our Board of Directors held ten meetings during 2009. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees on which he or she served during 2009. Attendance at our Board and committee meetings during 2009 averaged 95.9% for our directors as a group, and all of our directors who were members of the Board at the time of the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders attended the meeting.

 

The Board has established a process for shareholders and other interested parties to send written communications to the Board or to individual directors. Such communications should be sent by U.S. mail to the attention of the Office of the Secretary, Piper Jaffray Companies, 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800, Mail Stop J09N05, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402. Communications regarding accounting and auditing matters will be handled in accordance with our Complaint Procedures Regarding Accounting and Auditing Matters. Other communications will be collected by the secretary of the company and delivered, in the form received, to the lead director or, if so addressed, to a specified director.

 

The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders and has adopted a policy that contemplates shareholders recommending and nominating director candidates. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate for nomination by the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders or for vacancies on the Board that arise between shareholder meetings must timely provide the Nominating and Governance Committee with sufficient written documentation to permit a determination by the Board whether such candidate meets the required and desired director selection criteria set forth in our bylaws, our Corporate Governance Principles and our Director Nominee Selection Policy described below. Such documentation and the name of the director candidate must be sent by U.S. mail to the Chairperson, Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o the Office of the Secretary, Piper Jaffray Companies, 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800, Mail Stop J09N05, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.

 

Alternatively, shareholders may directly nominate a person for election to our Board by complying with the procedures set forth in Article II, Section 2.4 of our bylaws, and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under our bylaws, only persons nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in the bylaws will be eligible to serve as directors. In order to nominate a candidate for service as a director, you must be a shareholder at the time you give the Board notice of your nomination, and you must be entitled to vote for the election of directors at the meeting at which your nominee will be considered. In accordance with our bylaws, director nominations generally must be made pursuant to notice delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive offices at the address above, not later than the 90th day, nor earlier than the 120th day, prior to the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. Your notice must set forth all information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (including the nominee’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected).

 

As required by our Corporate Governance Principles and our Director Nominee Selection Policy, when evaluating the appropriate characteristics of candidates for service as a director, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account many factors. At a minimum, director candidates must demonstrate high standards of ethics, integrity and professionalism, independence, sound judgment, community leadership and meaningful experience in business, law or finance or other appropriate endeavor. Candidates also must be committed to representing the long-term interests of our

shareholders. In addition to these minimum qualifications, the Committee considers other factors it deems appropriate based on the current needs and desires of the Board, including specific business and financial expertise, experience as a director of a public company, and diversity. The Board considers a number of factors in its evaluation of diversity, including geography, age, gender, and ethnicity. Based on these factors and the qualifications and background of each director, the Board believes that its current composition is diverse. As indicated above, diversity is one factor in the total mix of information the Board considers when evaluating director candidates. The Committee will reassess the qualifications of a director, including the director’s attendance, involvement at Board and committee meetings and contribution to Board diversity, prior to recommending a director for reelection.

 

During 2009, directors who were not Piper Jaffray employees received an annual cash retainer of $50,000 for service on our Board and Board committees. No separate meeting fees were paid. The lead director and the chairperson of the Audit Committee each received an additional annual cash retainer of $8,000. The chairperson of each other standing committee of the Board each received an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000. In addition to the cash retainer, we granted equity awards to our non-employee directors to further align their interests with those of our shareholders. We granted non-employee directors who continued their service on the Board following our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders 1,000 shares of our common stock on the date of the annual meeting. Ms. Gambale, who joined our Board in September, received a pro rata annual cash retainer and a pro rata annual equity award based on our 2009 non-employee director compensation policy. She also received an initial equity grant of $60,000, which corresponds with our 2010 director compensation program.

 

For 2010, non-employee directors will receive a $60,000 annual cash retainer for service on our Board and Board committees. Also, the lead director and the chairperson of the Audit Committee each receives an additional annual cash retainer of $20,000, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000, and the chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000. Equity awards under the 2010 program consist of a grant of stock on the date of a director’s initial election or appointment to the Board for a number of shares determined by dividing $60,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the date of initial election or appointment. Directors whose service on the Board continues following each annual meeting of our stockholders will receive an additional grant of shares of our common stock for a number of shares determined by dividing $60,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the date of the annual meeting. All equity awards granted to our non-employee directors are granted under the Incentive Plan. Non-employee directors who join our Board after the first month of a calendar year are paid a pro rata annual retainer and awarded a pro rata equity award based on the period they serve as a director during the year.

 

Our non-employee directors may participate in the Piper Jaffray Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which was designed to facilitate increased equity ownership in the company. The plan permits our non-employee directors to defer all or a portion of the cash payable to them and shares of common stock granted to them for service as a director of Piper Jaffray for any calendar year. All cash amounts and share grants deferred by a participating director are credited to a recordkeeping account and deemed invested in shares of our common stock as of the date the deferred fees otherwise would have been paid or the shares otherwise would have been issued to the director. This deemed investment is measured in phantom stock, and no shares of common stock are reserved, repurchased or issued pursuant to the plan. With respect to cash amounts that have been deferred, the fair market value of all phantom stock credited to a director’s account will be paid out to the director (or, in the event of the director’s death, to his or her beneficiary) in a single lump-sum cash payment following the director’s cessation of service. The amount paid out will be determined based on the fair market value of the stock on the last day of the year in which the director’s service with us terminates. Share amounts that have been deferred will be paid out to the director (or, in the event of the director’s death, to his or her beneficiary) in the form of shares of common stock in an amount equal to the full

number of shares credited to the non-employee director’s account as of the last day of the year in which the cessation of service occurred. Directors who elect to participate in the plan are not required to pay income taxes on amounts or grants deferred but will instead pay income taxes on the amount of the lump-sum cash payment paid to the director (or beneficiary) at the time of such payment. Our obligations under the plan are unsecured general obligations to pay in the future the value of the participant’s account pursuant to the terms of the plan.

 

Non-employee directors also may participate in our charitable gift matching program, pursuant to which we will match a director’s gifts to eligible organizations dollar for dollar from a minimum of $50 up to an aggregate maximum of $1,500 per year. In addition, our non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board and committees of the Board. Employees of Piper Jaffray who also serve as directors receive compensation for their service as employees, but they do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors. No other compensation is paid to our Board members in their capacity as directors. Non-employee directors do not participate in our employee benefit plans.

 

The following table contains compensation information for our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2009. Mr. Volpi became a director in 2010 and therefore did not receive any compensation for 2009. Mr. Kaplan served as a director until September 24, 2009.

 

Non-Employee Director Compensation for 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

In 2009, we established the following declaration for our company: “Together we create the most trusted global investment bank, connecting capital with opportunity to build a better future.” This declaration has informed our compensation strategy as we look for ways to improve upon leadership, collaboration and accountability to deliver the best guidance and service for our clients and increase the company’s profitability. We have also considered our compensation strategy in light of the current economic environment and the impact of the recent credit crisis on our industry. In 2008, we incurred an operating loss that resulted in no member of the company’s Leadership Team receiving an annual incentive award for 2008 performance. For 2009, with a return to profitability and improving operating margins and return on equity metrics, the Compensation Committee awarded incentives to the company’s Leadership Team for 2009 performance. Also, it made structural changes to the company’s compensation programs for 2010 in the context of our new mission, the compensation philosophy and objectives described below, and the current economic and industry environment.

 

Throughout this proxy statement, we refer to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers, as the “named executive officers.” All of the named executive officers currently serve on our executive management team, which we refer to as the Leadership Team. The Leadership Team consists of eleven individuals, all of whom are executive officers of Piper Jaffray.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

Our executive compensation program is designed to drive and reward corporate performance annually and over the long term, as measured by increasing shareholder value. Compensation also must be internally equitable and externally competitive. We continually review our executive compensation program to ensure it reflects good governance practices and the best interests of shareholders, while meeting the following core objectives:

 

 

Setting Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (referred to as the “Committee” in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis) has responsibility for approving the compensation paid to our executive officers and ensuring it meets our objectives. Early each year, the Committee approves the amount of incentive compensation to be paid to our executive officers in recognition of prior-year performance, approves their base salaries for the upcoming year and establishes performance goals under an annual incentive program. Subject to limits on the compensation that may be paid under the annual incentive program (as described below under “Compensation Program and Payouts — Annual Incentive Compensation”), the Committee has full discretion to determine the amount of compensation to be paid to the executive officers.

 

Involvement of Executive Officers

 

The work of the Committee is supported by our chief administrative officer and our Human Resources department. Our chief administrative officer and head of human resources work closely with

our chief executive officer and, as appropriate, our chief financial officer and general counsel, to prepare and present information and recommendations for review and consideration by the Committee in connection with its executive compensation decisions, including regarding the performance goals to be established under the annual incentive program, financial information reviewed in connection with executive compensation decisions, the firms to be included in the compensation peer group, the performance evaluations and compensation recommendations for the executive officers, and the evaluation and compensation process to be followed by the Committee.

 

Compensation Peer Group

 

Our Human Resources department annually identifies a compensation peer group of firms with which we compete for executive talent, and this group currently consists of the following companies:

 

 

We also use data from external market surveys reflecting a broad number of firms within our industry (including members of our peer group), and we may review publicly available data for similar companies that are not direct competitors. The external market surveys that we used for 2009 were prepared by McLagan Partners, Towers Perrin and Mercer, and generally related to our industry and sub-sectors within our industry. We also used the surveys to gather market data outside of our industry in the corporate support area. This peer group and market data is an important factor considered by the Committee when setting compensation, but it is only one of multiple factors considered by the Committee, and the amount paid to each executive may be more or less than the composite market median based on individual performance, the roles and responsibilities of the executive, experience level of the individual, internal equity and other factors that the Committee deems important.

 

Compensation Consultant

 

In 2009, the Committee engaged an independent compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, to provide ongoing assessments and advice to the Committee. The independent compensation consultant participated in four Committee meetings during the year, and advised the Committee regarding the information presented to the Committee by our Human Resources department. The only services provided by the compensation consultant to the company related to its services for the Committee, except that our Human Resources department used three external market surveys prepared by Towers Perrin during 2009.

 

Compensation Program and Payments

 

The key components of our executive compensation program are base salary and annual incentive compensation, and the equity portion of our annual incentive compensation serves as our primary long-term incentive compensation component. Our U.S.-based executive officers also have the opportunity to participate in our company-wide Retirement Plan and all of our executive officers receive certain limited personal benefits, as described below. From time to time, some of our executive officers receive (or may be entitled to receive in the future) compensation paid out under historical compensation programs in which they participated in prior years and that continue to provide benefits, also as described below.

 

Base Salary

 

The purpose of base salary is to provide a set amount of cash compensation for each executive that is not variable in nature and is generally competitive with the market. The base salary levels for our Leadership Team reflect a desire to maintain a relatively equitable compensation baseline among the individuals serving on our Leadership Team, other than our chief executive officer and our president whose contributions are distinguished by a higher base salary reflective of the decision-making responsibility of these positions. Consistent with industry practice, the base salary for each of our Leadership

Team members has historically accounted for a relatively small portion of overall compensation. Further, we have not adjusted base salaries on an annual basis; base salaries for the Leadership Team (outside of promotional increases) have increased only once since our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp in December 2003. Base salary levels are adjusted, however, upon the initial appointment of an individual to the Leadership Team, and we increased the base salary of Mr. Winges in 2009 from $195,000 to $225,000 for this reason.

 

For 2010, the Compensation Committee has determined to increase the base salaries of the Leadership Team as a percentage of total compensation. This shift in compensation mix recognizes the importance of key leadership and daily accountabilities, such as strategic planning, people management, risk management, and other franchise-building activities. Also, we believe shifting the mix of compensation by increasing base salaries and reducing annual incentives serves to mitigate the potential for risk-taking generally associated with a mix more weighted to annual performance. Accordingly, Mr. Duff’s base salary has been increased from $400,000 to $650,000; Mr. Schnettler’s from $300,000 to $550,000; Ms. Schoneman’s from $225,000 to $425,000; Mr. Salveson’s from $225,000 to $425,000; and Mr. Winges’ from $225,00 to $425,000. These changes were effective March 1, 2010.

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

The Committee has established an annual incentive program for our Leadership Team that provides a significant portion of the total compensation paid to our named executive officers. The objective of the program is to provide cash and equity compensation that is variable based on the achievement of annual performance goals determined each year by the Committee. Delivering a significant portion of our compensation to the Leadership Team through the annual incentive program reflects the core objectives of our compensation program, particularly pay-for-performance. The program is administered by the Committee under the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan and is designed to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code to ensure the tax deductibility of incentive compensation paid to our named executive officers. Under Section 162(m), we cannot deduct compensation in excess of $1 million that is paid to a named executive officer in any year unless the compensation qualifies as “performance-based” compensation under Section 162(m). Awards under the annual incentive program are referred to as “qualified performance-based awards.”

 

  2009 Program

 

At the outset of each year, the Committee grants performance-based awards to each member of the Leadership Team that are subject to the achievement of an annual performance goal of the company — typically a financial performance goal related to pre-tax operating income. The Committee granted qualified performance-based awards in February 2009 to each member of the Leadership Team in an amount equal to 7% of our 2009 adjusted pre-tax operating income, to be paid in a combination of cash and equity as determined by the Committee.

 

 

 

  Compensation Determinations and Relevant Factors

 

When determining the amount of incentive compensation to be paid for 2009, the Committee reviewed and considered the following information:

 

 

Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy and the recommendation of our chief executive officer, no members of the Leadership Team received an incentive award based on our 2008 performance. As a result of our improved performance during 2009, the members of the Leadership Team received incentive award payments for 2009. In determining the payments made to each member of the Leadership Team for 2009, the Committee took into account all of the information described above and the annual incentive program provision governing the maximum aggregate amount payable to our Leadership Team under the qualified performance-based awards. As a result of these factors, the Committee exercised its discretion to pay less than the maximum amounts of annual incentive compensation payable under the qualified performance-based awards granted to each of the named executive officers for 2009.

 

The following factors influenced the compensation for each named executive officer for 2009:

 

 

 

Based on this information, the Committee evaluated the performance of the chief executive officer and determined his annual incentive compensation, assessed relative levels of responsibility and contribution during the year for each of the other executive officers and approved 2009 annual incentive compensation as noted in the following table. For comparative purposes, we have included annual incentive amounts for 2008 and 2007. Also, this table is not a substitute for the information required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, specifically the Summary Compensation Table and the related tables that appear later in this proxy statement.

 

 

 

 

The table below shows the compensation that was paid in cash and equity to each named executive officer for 2009, expressed as a percentage of total cash and equity compensation for the year, as measured by the company:

 

 

  Equity Award

 

Consistent with our philosophy regarding executive stock ownership, the annual incentive compensation for the named executive officers was paid out in a combination of cash and equity. We view the equity component of the annual incentive award as a long-term incentive designed to provide compensation opportunities based on the creation of shareholder value and an increase in our stock price. The upside potential of these equity awards will not be realized by the executive officers unless our performance improves over the vesting period of the awards. Historically, we have granted equity awards through a combination of restricted stock and stock options. However, for 2009, we granted equity awards to the Leadership Team solely in the form of restricted stock. We believe restricted stock awards strongly align the Leadership Team’s interests with those of stockholders by ensuring that the same fluctuations in our stock that affect our stockholders also directly affect the value of the awards granted to the Leadership Team. We also believe the restricted stock grants promote focus on long-term, sustainable growth by our Leadership Team because short-term fluctuations in our stock price will not affect whether the awards have value to the recipients.

 

Consistent with prior years, the number of shares of restricted stock granted to each officer was determined by dividing the total dollar value designated to be paid out to the officer in restricted stock by the closing price of our common stock on February 16, 2010. The restricted stock has a three-year cliff vesting schedule, consistent with prior years in which annual incentive compensation was paid.

 

Long-Term, Performance-Based (ROE) Equity Grant

 

In May 2008, the Committee granted a long-term, performance-based restricted stock award to the company’s Leadership Team. This incremental grant is designed to improve our executive share ownership to a more meaningful level, further link executive performance with shareholder value, and act as a significant retention tool for our Leadership Team. This performance-based grant will not vest unless the company meets a return on adjusted common equity target of 11% over a twelve-month period, at which time it will vest in its entirety. This performance target represents a significant increase to the company’s historic twelve-month return on adjusted common equity levels, and the target must be met by April 30, 2013 or the awards will be forfeited. The adjustment to the return on common equity metric eliminates the remaining goodwill associated with the 1998 acquisition of our predecessor company by U.S. Bancorp, which was retained by us at the time of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp. We excluded this goodwill from the definition of return on common equity because we believe it does not accurately reflect the equity deployed in our businesses. The award terms also require the recipient to be employed at the time of vesting, which acts as a retention tool for our Leadership Team, and the Committee has the discretion to cause the award to be forfeited if a recipient leaves the Leadership Team but remains an employee of the company.

This performance-based grant was awarded to each member of the Leadership Team as of May 15, 2008, which included each named executive officer other than Ms. Schoneman, our chief financial officer, and Mr. Winges, our head of fixed income services. Each of Ms. Schoneman and Mr. Winges was granted a performance-based award following their appointment to the Leadership Team, and each of their awards has the same vesting provisions as the other members of the Leadership Team, i.e., the award requires a return on adjusted common equity of 11% sustained over a twelve-month period to be attained by April 30, 2013. The total number of shares granted in connection with these awards was 362,037, and the value of these awards and the number of shares granted to each named executive officer is reported below in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table that follows the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Other Compensation

 

Members of our Leadership Team receive limited additional compensation in the form of reimbursement of dues for club memberships used for business purposes and certain insurance premiums. Our executive officers who participate in our Retirement Plan, a 401(k) plan, receive company matching contributions on 100% of their annual contributions up to a maximum of 6% of their total pay, up to the social security taxable wage base; their contributions are matched on the same basis we match contributions by non-executive employees. Some of our executive officers also receive payments from time to time related to historical compensation programs, typically structured as investments made by the company on behalf of certain employees. For example, certain members of the Leadership Team receive payments under the U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. Second Century Growth Deferred Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective September 30, 1998) (the “Second Century 1998 Plan”) and the U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. Second Century 2000 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Second Century 2000 Plan”). Certain key employees were eligible to participate in these plans, under which participants were granted one or more deferred awards that were deemed invested in certain measuring investments. Following a liquidity event for a particular investment, the participant receives a benefit payment based on the deemed return to the participant and payment of the portion of the participant’s account that was deemed invested. Participants may continue to receive payments under the plans until a liquidity or bankruptcy event has occurred with respect to each measuring investment. Messrs. Salveson and Schnettler were granted deferred awards under these plans in 1996, 1997, 1998 and/or 2000, and received payouts in 2007 and 2008 and, with respect to Mr. Schnettler, in 2009, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. No new awards have been granted under these plans since 2000, and participation in the plans is frozen.

 

Termination and Change in Control Arrangements

 

  Non-Qualified Retirement Plan

 

Following our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on December 31, 2003, we assumed liability for the non-qualified benefits accrued for our employees under the defined benefit excess plan component of the U.S. Bancorp Cash Balance Pension Plan. In 2004, we established the Piper Jaffray Companies Non-Qualified Retirement Plan to maintain and administer these benefits, which were transferred to us following the spin-off. Thereafter, participation in the plan was frozen. The Committee approved the termination of this plan in November 2009, and balances for all plan participants will be paid out in March 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Non-Qualified Retirement Plan account balances for our named executive officers were as follows:

 

  Other Termination and Change-in-Control Provisions

 

Certain award agreements and plans under which compensation has been awarded to our named executive officers include provisions regarding the payment of the covered compensation in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control of our company, as follows:

 

 

 

Compensation Policies

 

Executive Stock Ownership

 

We have adopted stock ownership guidelines to ensure that each member of the Leadership Team maintains a meaningful equity stake in the company, which aligns management’s interests with those of our shareholders. The guidelines also help to drive long-term performance and strengthen retention. The guidelines provide for our Leadership Team members to hold Piper Jaffray Companies stock as follows:

 

 

These goals must be attained within five years of joining the Leadership Team. As of January 4, 2010, all of the named executive officers meet the guidelines based on 2009 salary levels. We also have adopted a share retention policy requiring members of our Leadership Team to hold at least 50% of the shares awarded to them through our incentive plans, or acquired upon exercise of stock options awarded to them, net of taxes and transaction costs, for a minimum of five years. Shares held by Leadership Team members that were acquired prior to the member joining the Leadership Team are not subject to these retention guidelines.

Equity Grant Timing Policy

 

In 2006, we established a policy pursuant to which equity grants to employees will be made only once each quarter, on the 15th calendar day of the month following the public release of earnings for the preceding quarter (or, if the 15th calendar day falls on a weekend or holiday, on the first business day thereafter). This policy covers grants made by the Committee as well as grants made by our chief executive officer to employees other than executive officers pursuant to authority delegated to him by the Committee. We established this equity grant timing policy to provide a regular, fixed schedule for equity grants that eliminates the exercise of discretion with respect to the grant date of employee equity awards. The grant dates under this policy are outside of the designated trading blackout periods that apply to our employees generally and fall within the regularly scheduled trading window periods during which our executive officers generally are permitted to trade in our securities.

 

Policy on Qualifying Compensation for Deductibility

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits deductions for non-performance-based annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our named executive officers who served as executive officers at the end of the preceding fiscal year. Our policy is to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation paid to these officers. Accordingly, in 2004, 2006, and 2008 we sought and obtained shareholder approval for the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan, under which our annual incentive program is administered and annual cash and equity incentives are paid. The plan is designed and administered to qualify compensation awarded under our annual incentive program as “performance-based” to ensure that the tax deduction is available to the company. From time to time the Committee may authorize payments to the named executive officers that may not be fully deductible, if they believe such payments are in the interests of shareholders.

 

The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and has recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the company’s year-end disclosure documents.

 

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray Companies

Lisa K. Polsky, Chairperson

Frank L. Sims

Jean M. Taylor

 

The following table contains compensation information for our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The “Parking stipend” has been discontinued. The “Other” amounts identified in the table above include:

 

 

 

 

The following table provides information regarding the grants of plan-based awards made to the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning equity awards held by the named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2009. No stock options were exercised by any of the named executive officers in 2009.

 

 

 

 

The following table provides information regarding amounts accrued in 2009 by the named executive officers in our Non-Qualified Retirement Plan. As discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee approved the termination of this plan in November 2009 and all balances will be paid to plan participants based on the aggregate balance at fiscal year-end in March 2010. No amounts or portions of amounts reflected in the column reporting aggregate earnings in the last fiscal year are included in the Summary Compensation Table because the amounts earned were not earned at a preferential rate.

 

 

Under the Second Century 1998 Plan and the Second Century 2000 Plan described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, certain key employees were granted one or more deferred bonus awards that were deemed invested in certain measuring investments. Following a liquidity event for a particular investment, the participant receives a benefit payment based on the deemed return to the participant and payment of the portion of the participant’s account that was deemed invested. Participants may continue to receive payments under the plans until a liquidity or bankruptcy event has occurred with respect to each measuring investment. No new awards have been granted under these plans since 2000, and participation in the plans is frozen. The following table identifies the amounts earned in 2009 and the deferred balances for each of the named executive officers who received one or

more deferred bonuses under the plans. The amounts earned in 2009 are included in “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

 

The following table sets forth quantitative information with respect to potential payments to be made to each of the named executive officers or their beneficiaries upon termination in various circumstances, assuming termination on December 31, 2009. In the following table, unless indicated otherwise, all equity is listed at its dollar value as of December 31, 2009, based on the closing sale price of our common stock on that date. Options are shown at intrinsic value, which represents the difference between the exercise price of the option and the stock price on December 31, 2009.