e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 26, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-6544
Sysco Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
74-1648137
(IRS employer
identification number) |
|
|
|
1390 Enclave Parkway
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77077-2099
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(281) 584-1390
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer þ |
Accelerated Filer o |
Non-accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
592,548,417 shares of common stock were outstanding as of January 23, 2010.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except for Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2009 |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
December 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
647,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,087,084 |
|
|
$ |
373,074 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
61,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less
allowances of $67,035, $36,078 and $67,400 |
|
|
2,526,044 |
|
|
|
2,468,511 |
|
|
|
2,623,509 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,790,327 |
|
|
|
1,650,666 |
|
|
|
1,862,187 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
63,674 |
|
|
|
64,418 |
|
|
|
60,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,089,511 |
|
|
|
5,270,679 |
|
|
|
4,919,708 |
|
Plant and equipment at cost, less depreciation |
|
|
3,072,721 |
|
|
|
2,979,200 |
|
|
|
2,890,641 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,551,550 |
|
|
|
1,510,795 |
|
|
|
1,384,790 |
|
Intangibles, less amortization |
|
|
118,032 |
|
|
|
121,089 |
|
|
|
78,976 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
128,683 |
|
|
|
93,858 |
|
|
|
93,541 |
|
Prepaid pension cost |
|
|
70,753 |
|
|
|
26,746 |
|
|
|
249,840 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
245,716 |
|
|
|
214,252 |
|
|
|
193,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
2,114,734 |
|
|
|
1,966,740 |
|
|
|
2,001,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,276,966 |
|
|
$ |
10,216,619 |
|
|
$ |
9,811,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,906,745 |
|
|
$ |
1,856,887 |
|
|
$ |
1,707,331 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
793,303 |
|
|
|
797,756 |
|
|
|
806,055 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
56,775 |
|
|
|
323,983 |
|
|
|
538,790 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
18,482 |
|
|
|
162,365 |
|
|
|
234,286 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
9,163 |
|
|
|
6,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,783,743 |
|
|
|
3,150,154 |
|
|
|
3,293,209 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,468,690 |
|
|
|
2,467,486 |
|
|
|
1,972,612 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
545,863 |
|
|
|
526,377 |
|
|
|
539,534 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
548,383 |
|
|
|
622,900 |
|
|
|
712,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
3,562,936 |
|
|
|
3,616,763 |
|
|
|
3,224,201 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share
Authorized 1,500,000 shares, issued none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1 per share
Authorized 2,000,000,000 shares, issued
765,174,900 shares |
|
|
765,175 |
|
|
|
765,175 |
|
|
|
765,175 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
788,138 |
|
|
|
760,352 |
|
|
|
750,843 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
6,844,095 |
|
|
|
6,539,890 |
|
|
|
6,281,575 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(180,095 |
) |
|
|
(277,986 |
) |
|
|
(197,287 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 173,100,605,
175,148,403 and 173,746,062 shares |
|
|
(4,287,026 |
) |
|
|
(4,337,729 |
) |
|
|
(4,306,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,930,287 |
|
|
|
3,449,702 |
|
|
|
3,294,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,276,966 |
|
|
$ |
10,216,619 |
|
|
$ |
9,811,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The June 27, 2009 balance sheet has been derived from the audited financial statements at
that date.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except for Share and Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
17,949,925 |
|
|
$ |
19,027,232 |
|
|
$ |
8,868,499 |
|
|
$ |
9,149,803 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
14,507,679 |
|
|
|
15,390,563 |
|
|
|
7,173,612 |
|
|
|
7,399,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
3,442,246 |
|
|
|
3,636,669 |
|
|
|
1,694,887 |
|
|
|
1,750,113 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
2,482,567 |
|
|
|
2,710,053 |
|
|
|
1,232,536 |
|
|
|
1,328,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
959,679 |
|
|
|
926,616 |
|
|
|
462,351 |
|
|
|
421,864 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
65,322 |
|
|
|
54,810 |
|
|
|
31,522 |
|
|
|
28,400 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(8,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
897,507 |
|
|
|
879,842 |
|
|
|
431,967 |
|
|
|
398,687 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
302,953 |
|
|
|
365,374 |
|
|
|
163,618 |
|
|
|
161,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
594,554 |
|
|
$ |
514,468 |
|
|
$ |
268,349 |
|
|
$ |
237,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
592,110,975 |
|
|
|
599,903,629 |
|
|
|
592,651,712 |
|
|
|
597,549,831 |
|
Diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
592,678,989 |
|
|
|
601,100,591 |
|
|
|
593,372,477 |
|
|
|
598,233,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
594,554 |
|
|
$ |
514,468 |
|
|
$ |
268,349 |
|
|
$ |
237,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
83,946 |
|
|
|
(118,701 |
) |
|
|
46,864 |
|
|
|
(104,574 |
) |
Items presented net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of cash flow hedge |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior
service cost |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial
losses (gains), net |
|
|
12,332 |
|
|
|
5,411 |
|
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized
transition obligation |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Pension liability assumption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
97,891 |
|
|
|
(128,519 |
) |
|
|
53,837 |
|
|
|
(98,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
692,445 |
|
|
$ |
385,949 |
|
|
$ |
322,186 |
|
|
$ |
138,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
594,554 |
|
|
$ |
514,468 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
39,913 |
|
|
|
35,129 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
189,428 |
|
|
|
190,609 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(172,756 |
) |
|
|
337,453 |
|
Provision for losses on receivables |
|
|
19,815 |
|
|
|
30,652 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Additional investment in certain assets and liabilities, net of effect of businesses acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables |
|
|
(53,597 |
) |
|
|
26,769 |
|
(Increase) in inventories |
|
|
(121,626 |
) |
|
|
(57,859 |
) |
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
|
(301,018 |
) |
(Decrease) in accrued expenses |
|
|
(16,974 |
) |
|
|
(149,811 |
) |
(Decrease) in accrued income taxes |
|
|
(236,099 |
) |
|
|
(68,877 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(30,372 |
) |
|
|
2,087 |
|
(Decrease) increase in other long-term liabilities and prepaid pension cost, net |
|
|
(97,343 |
) |
|
|
2,889 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(2,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
143,999 |
|
|
|
561,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to plant and equipment |
|
|
(247,575 |
) |
|
|
(178,596 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of plant and equipment |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(9,161 |
) |
|
|
(16,277 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(60,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
(34,825 |
) |
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(349,301 |
) |
|
|
(193,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt borrowings |
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
|
9,316 |
|
Other debt repayments |
|
|
(5,601 |
) |
|
|
(5,610 |
) |
Common stock reissued from treasury for share-based compensation awards |
|
|
36,914 |
|
|
|
85,628 |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358,751 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(283,766 |
) |
|
|
(264,687 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(247,398 |
) |
|
|
(531,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
(15,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(439,478 |
) |
|
|
(178,478 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,087,084 |
|
|
|
551,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
647,606 |
|
|
$ |
373,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
67,670 |
|
|
$ |
55,577 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
759,704 |
|
|
|
73,830 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Unless this Form 10-Q indicates otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms we,
our, us, Sysco, or the company as used in this Form 10-Q refer to Sysco Corporation
together with its consolidated subsidiaries and divisions.
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the company, without audit, with
the exception of the June 27, 2009 consolidated balance sheet which was taken from the audited
financial statements included in the companys Fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
financial statements include consolidated balance sheets, consolidated results of operations,
consolidated statements of comprehensive income and consolidated cash flows. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present
fairly the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for all
periods presented have been made.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
and notes thereto included in the companys Fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Sysco has evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued,
February 2, 2010.
A review of the financial information herein has been made by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
auditors, in accordance with established professional standards and procedures for such a review.
A report from Ernst & Young LLP concerning their review is included as Exhibit 15.1 to this Form
10-Q.
2. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No.
EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities, which was subsequently codified within Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 260, Earnings Per Share. This standard addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need
to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method. This standard was effective for Sysco beginning in fiscal 2010 and interim periods within
that year. All prior-period earnings per share data presented in filings subsequent to adoption
must be adjusted retrospectively to conform with the provisions of this standard. Early
application of this standard was not permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on the companys consolidated financial statements.
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which was subsequently codified within ASC
825, Financial Instruments. This standard amended previous guidance to require disclosures about
the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies.
Prior disclosure requirements only applied to annual financial statements. This standard was
effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, which was the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 for Sysco. The company has included the required disclosures for this standard in Note
4, Fair Value Measurements.
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at
Fair Value. This update provides additional guidance, including illustrative examples, clarifying
the measurement of liabilities at fair value. This update is effective for the first reporting
period beginning after its issuance. The company adopted the provisions of this update in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the
companys consolidated financial statements.
5
3. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements. This update requires some new disclosures and clarifies some
existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements codified within ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. The majority of the provisions of this update, including those
applicable to Sysco, are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. Early application of the provisions of this update is permitted. The company
will adopt the applicable provisions of this update in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and is
currently evaluating the impact the adoption of these provisions will have on its consolidated
financial statement disclosures.
4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. an
exit price). The accounting guidance includes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy
are as follows:
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term
of the asset or liability; and |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which include managements own
assumption about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability, including assumptions about risk. |
Syscos policy is to invest in only high-quality investments. Cash equivalents primarily
include time deposits, certificates of deposit, commercial paper and all highly liquid instruments
with original maturities of three months or less. Short-term investments consist of commercial
paper with original maturities of greater than three months but less than one year. These
investments are considered available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value. As of December 26,
2009, the difference between the fair value of the short-term investments and the original cost was
not material. Restricted cash consists of investments in high-quality money market funds.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities
measured at fair value.
|
|
Time deposits, certificates of deposit and commercial paper included in cash equivalents
are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
|
|
|
Commercial paper included in short-term investments is valued using broker quotes that
utilize observable market inputs. |
|
|
|
Money market funds are valued at the closing price reported by the fund sponsor on an
actively traded exchange. |
|
|
|
The interest rate swap agreements are valued using a swap valuation model that utilizes
observable market inputs. |
6
The following tables present the companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of December 26, 2009, June 27, 2009 and December 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value as of December 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
357,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
102,846,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
460,646,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,860,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,860,000 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
128,683,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,683,000 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
486,483,000 |
|
|
$ |
165,240,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
651,723,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,109,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,109,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured at Fair Value as of June 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
721,710,000 |
|
|
$ |
117,844,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
839,554,000 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
93,858,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,858,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
815,568,000 |
|
|
$ |
117,844,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
933,412,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured at Fair Value as of December 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,729,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,729,000 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
93,541,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,541,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
93,541,000 |
|
|
$ |
207,729,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
301,270,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of Syscos total debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the
same or similar issue or on the current rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining
maturities. The fair value of total debt approximated $2,603,952,000 and $2,548,861,000 as of
December 26, 2009 and June 27, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of total debt was
$2,477,128,000 and $2,476,649,000 as of December 26, 2009 and June 27, 2009, respectively.
5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Sysco manages its debt portfolio by targeting an overall desired position of fixed and
floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps from time to time to achieve this goal. The
company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
In September 2009, the company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively
converted $200,000,000 of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2014 to floating rate debt. In
October 2009, the company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted
$250,000,000 of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2013 to floating rate debt. Both transactions
were entered into with the goal of reducing overall borrowing cost. These transactions were
designated as fair value hedges since the swaps hedge against the changes in fair value of fixed
rate debt resulting from changes in interest rates.
7
The location and the fair value of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as
of December 26, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
534,000 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
1,109,000 |
|
The location and effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on the consolidated
results of operations for the 26-week period and 13-week period ended December 26, 2009 presented
on a pre-tax basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (Gain) or Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
Location of (Gain) |
|
26-Week |
|
13-Week |
|
|
or Loss Recognized |
|
Period Ended |
|
Period Ended |
|
|
in Income |
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
Fair Value Hedge Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(1,454,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,679,000 |
) |
Hedged items debt |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(104,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Hedge ineffectiveness represents the difference between the changes in the fair value of the
derivative instruments and the changes in fair value of the fixed rate debt attributable to changes
in the benchmark interest rate. Hedge ineffectiveness is recorded directly in earnings within
interest expense and was immaterial for the 26-week period and the 13-week periods ended December
26, 2009. The interest rate swaps do not contain a credit-risk-related contingent feature.
6. DEBT
As of December 26, 2009, Sysco had uncommitted bank lines of credit which provided for
unsecured borrowings for working capital of up to $88,000,000, of which none was outstanding.
As of December 26, 2009, the companys Irish Subsidiary, Pallas Foods Limited, had a
20,000,000 (Euro) committed facility for unsecured borrowings for working capital expiring March
31, 2010, which consisted of a 12,000,000 (Euro) overdraft and a 8,000,000 (Euro) revolver.
There were no borrowings outstanding under either portion of this facility as of December 26, 2009.
In January 2010, the 8,000,000 (Euro) revolver portion of the facility was discontinued, leaving
the 12,000,000 (Euro) overdraft line portion of the facility with the same expiration date of
March 31, 2010.
Sysco and one of its subsidiaries, Sysco International, Co., have a revolving credit facility
supporting the companys U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs. The facility in the amount
of $1,000,000,000 expires on November 4, 2012, but is subject to extension.
As of December 26, 2009, there were no commercial paper issuances outstanding. During the
26-week period ended December 26, 2009, aggregate commercial paper issuances and short-term bank
borrowings ranged from zero to approximately $1,820,000.
8
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net company-sponsored benefit cost for the 26-week period presented are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Plans |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
33,326,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,387,000 |
|
|
$ |
164,000 |
|
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
59,797,000 |
|
|
|
56,606,000 |
|
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
|
312,000 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(52,430,000 |
) |
|
|
(63,711,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2,104,000 |
|
|
|
1,494,000 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
(gain) |
|
|
20,262,000 |
|
|
|
8,863,000 |
|
|
|
(245,000 |
) |
|
|
(79,000 |
) |
Amortization of transition
obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
63,059,000 |
|
|
$ |
43,639,000 |
|
|
$ |
369,000 |
|
|
$ |
619,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net company-sponsored benefit cost for the 13-week period presented are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Plans |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
16,663,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,256,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,000 |
|
|
$ |
123,000 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
29,898,000 |
|
|
|
28,555,000 |
|
|
|
141,000 |
|
|
|
156,000 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(26,215,000 |
) |
|
|
(31,856,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1,053,000 |
|
|
|
1,151,000 |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
(gain) |
|
|
10,130,000 |
|
|
|
4,431,000 |
|
|
|
(122,000 |
) |
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
Amortization of transition
obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
31,529,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,537,000 |
|
|
$ |
185,000 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syscos contributions to its company-sponsored defined benefit plans were $77,690,000 and
$87,394,000 during the 26-week periods ended December 26, 2009 and December 27, 2008, respectively.
Syscos minimum required contribution to its company-sponsored qualified pension plan
(Retirement Plan) for the calendar 2009 plan year was estimated at $95,000,000 to meet ERISA
minimum funding requirements. The company will be required to pay quarterly contributions for the
calendar 2010 plan year, the first installment of which must be made in fiscal 2010. The company
anticipates it will make $140,000,000 of contributions to the Retirement Plan in fiscal 2010. The
companys contributions to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) and other
post-retirement plans are made in the amounts needed to fund current year benefit payments. The
estimated fiscal 2010 contributions to fund benefit payments for the SERP and other post-retirement
plans are $19,445,000 and $372,000, respectively.
9
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
594,554,000 |
|
|
$ |
514,568,000 |
|
|
$ |
268,349,000 |
|
|
$ |
237,654,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denumerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
basic shares
outstanding |
|
|
592,110,975 |
|
|
|
599,903,629 |
|
|
|
592,651,712 |
|
|
|
597,549,831 |
|
Dilutive effect of
share-based awards |
|
|
568,014 |
|
|
|
1,196,962 |
|
|
|
720,765 |
|
|
|
683,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
diluted shares
outstanding |
|
|
592,678,989 |
|
|
|
601,100,591 |
|
|
|
593,372,477 |
|
|
|
598,233,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
share: |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share: |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of options that were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation
because the effect would have been anti-dilutive was approximately 65,900,000 and 61,300,000 for
the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The number of options that were not
included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because the effect would have been
anti-dilutive was approximately 66,300,000 and 63,000,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
2009, respectively.
9. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Sysco provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors under several
share-based payment arrangements including various employee stock incentive plans, the Employees
Stock Purchase Plan, and various non-employee director plans. Sysco also previously provided
share-based compensation under its Management Incentive Plans.
Stock Incentive Plans
Syscos 2007 Stock Incentive Plan was amended in November 2009 to increase the total number of
shares authorized for issuance under the plan from 30,000,000 to 55,000,000 shares. The number of
shares available for issuance as options or stock appreciation rights was increased from 25,000,000
to 55,000,000 shares. The number of shares available for issuance as restricted stock, restricted
stock units or other types of stock-based awards was increased from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares.
The amendment also removed the provision that allowed for issuance of restricted stock, restricted
stock units and other types of stock-based awards in excess of the 5,000,000 share limitation if
the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the plan was reduced by four shares for
each share issued in excess of the limitation.
In the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010, options to purchase 8,494,200 shares were granted to
employees from the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. The fair value of each option award is estimated as
of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average grant-date
fair value per share of options granted during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was $4.53.
In the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010, 652,300 restricted stock units were granted to employees
from the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. The majority of these restricted stock units were granted with
dividend equivalents. The fair value of each restricted stock unit award granted with a dividend
equivalent is based on the companys stock price as of the date of grant. For restricted stock
unit awards granted without dividend equivalents, the fair value was reduced by the present value
of expected dividends during the vesting period. The weighted average grant-date fair value per
share of restricted stock units granted during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was $27.24.
10
In the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010, 58,310 shares of restricted stock were granted to
non-employee directors from the 2005 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan. The fair value of the
restricted stock awards is based on the companys stock price as of the date of grant. The
weighted average grant-date fair value per share of restricted stock granted during the first 26
weeks of fiscal 2010 was $27.44.
Syscos 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan was adopted in November 2009 and provides for
the issuance of up to 750,000 shares of Sysco common stock for share-based awards to non-employee
directors. The authorized shares may be granted as restricted stock, restricted stock units,
elected shares or additional shares. This plan will replace the 2005 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Plan once all remaining shares in the 2005 Plan have been issued.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan
Plan participants purchased 1,025,706 shares of Sysco common stock under the Sysco Employees
Stock Purchase Plan during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010.
The weighted average fair value per share of employee stock purchase rights issued pursuant to
the Employees Stock Purchase Plan was $3.54 during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010. The fair
value of the stock purchase rights is estimated as the difference between the stock price and the
employee purchase price.
All Share-Based Payment Arrangements
The total share-based compensation cost that has been recognized in results of operations was
$39,913,000 and $35,129,000 for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
As of December 26, 2009, there was $86,110,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to share-based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.16 years.
10. INCOME TAXES
Internal Revenue Service Settlement
Syscos affiliate, Baugh Supply Chain Cooperative (BSCC), is a cooperative taxed under
subchapter T of the United States Internal Revenue Code, the operation of which has resulted in a
deferral of tax payments. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), in connection with its audits of
the companys 2003 through 2006 federal income tax returns, proposed adjustments that would have
accelerated amounts that the company had previously deferred and would have resulted in the payment
of interest on those deferred amounts. Sysco reached a settlement with the IRS on August 21, 2009
to cease paying U.S. federal taxes related to BSCC on a deferred basis, pay the amounts that were
recorded within deferred taxes related to BSCC over a three year period and make a one-time payment
of $41,000,000, of which approximately $39,000,000 was non-deductible. The settlement addresses
the BSCC deferred tax issue as it relates to the IRS audit of the companys 2003 through 2006
federal income tax returns, and settles the matter for all subsequent periods, including the 2007
and 2008 federal income tax returns already under audit. As a result of the settlement, the
company will pay the amounts owed in the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts paid annually: |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$ |
528,000,000 |
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
212,000,000 |
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
212,000,000 |
|
Of the amounts to be paid in fiscal 2010 included in the table above, $422,000,000 was paid in
the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and the remaining payments will be paid in equal installments
with Syscos remaining quarterly tax payments. Amounts to be paid in fiscal 2011 and 2012 will be
paid with Syscos quarterly tax payments. The company believes it has access to sufficient cash on
hand, cash flow from operations and current access to capital to make payments on all of the
amounts noted above. The company had previously accrued interest for a portion of the exposure
pertaining to the IRS proposed adjustments and as a result of the settlement with the IRS, Sysco
recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $29,000,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
11
Syscos deferred taxes were impacted by the timing of these installment payments. Sysco
reclassified amounts due within one year from deferred taxes to accrued income taxes at the
beginning of fiscal 2010. Additionally, beginning in fiscal 2010, the company is not deferring
taxes for federal purposes according to its agreement with the IRS.
Uncertain Tax Benefits
As of December 26, 2009, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $86,740,000 and the
gross amount of accrued interest liabilities was $36,483,000. Accrued interest decreased from the
amount accrued as of June 27, 2009 of $146,998,000 due to the settlement with the IRS. It is
reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits with respect to certain of the
companys unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease in the next twelve months either
because Sysco prevails on positions that were being challenged upon audit or because the company
agrees to their disallowance. Items that may cause changes to unrecognized tax benefits primarily
include the consideration of various filing requirements in various states and the allocation of
income and expense between tax jurisdictions. At this time, an estimate of the range of the
reasonably possible change cannot be made.
Effective Tax Rates
The effective tax rate of 33.75% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted
by three items. First, as discussed above, the company recorded an income tax benefit of
approximately $29,000,000 resulting from the one-time reversal of previously accrued interest
related to the settlement with the IRS. Second, the carrying values of the companys
corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies are adjusted to their cash surrender values. The
gain of $26,341,000 recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender
values in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 is non-taxable for income tax purposes and had the
impact of decreasing the effective tax rate for the period. Third, the company recorded a tax
benefit of approximately $5,000,000 for the reversal of valuation allowances previously recorded on
state net operating loss carryforwards.
The effective tax rate of 41.53% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was unfavorably
impacted by two items. First, a loss of $54,604,000 was recorded to adjust the carrying value of
COLI policies to their cash surrender values in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009. Second, the
company recorded a tax adjustment of approximately $11,000,000 to accrue for a previously
unidentified tax contingency arising from a tax audit. The effective tax rate for the first 26
weeks of fiscal 2009 was favorably impacted by a decrease in a tax provision for a foreign tax
liability of approximately $6,600,000 resulting from changes in exchange rates.
The effective tax rate of 37.88% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted
by the gain of $5,189,000 recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash
surrender values in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The effective tax rate of 40.39% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was unfavorably
impacted by the loss of $31,696,000 recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their
cash surrender values in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The effective tax rate for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 was favorably impacted by a decrease in a tax provision for a foreign tax
liability of approximately $5,700,000 resulting from changes in exchange rates.
Other
The determination of the companys provision for income taxes requires significant judgment,
the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. The companys
provision for income taxes reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in the various U.S.
federal and state, as well as foreign jurisdictions. Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or
decreases in permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals
for tax contingencies or valuation allowances, and the companys change in the mix of earnings from
these taxing jurisdictions all affect the overall effective tax rate.
11. ACQUISITIONS
During the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010, in the aggregate, the company paid cash of
$9,161,000 primarily for contingent consideration related to operations acquired in previous fiscal
years and for acquisitions made during fiscal 2010. The fiscal 2010 acquisitions were immaterial
to the consolidated financial statements.
12
Certain acquisitions involve contingent consideration typically payable over periods up to
four years only in the event that certain operating results are attained or certain outstanding
contingencies are resolved. As of December 26, 2009, aggregate contingent consideration amounts
outstanding relating to acquisitions completed prior to fiscal 2010 included $73,383,000 in cash
which, if earned, could result in the recording of additional goodwill.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Sysco is engaged in various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully
adjudicated. These proceedings, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse
effect upon the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the company when
ultimately concluded.
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
Sysco contributes to several multi-employer defined benefit pension plans based on obligations
arising under collective bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees. Sysco does
not directly manage these multi-employer plans, which are generally managed by boards of trustees,
half of whom are appointed by the unions and the other half by other employers contributing to the
plan. Based upon the information available from plan administrators, management believes that
several of these multi-employer plans are underfunded. In addition, pension-related legislation
requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals
based on the level of their underfunding. As a result, Sysco expects its contributions to these
plans to increase in the future.
Under current law regarding multi-employer defined benefit plans, a plans termination,
Syscos voluntary withdrawal, or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any
underfunded multi-employer defined benefit plan would require Sysco to make payments to the plan
for Syscos proportionate share of the multi-employer plans unfunded vested liabilities. Based on
the information available from plan administrators, which has valuation dates ranging from December
31, 2007 to June 30, 2009, Sysco estimates its share of withdrawal liability on most of the
multi-employer plans in which it participates could have been as much as $174,000,000 as of
December 26, 2009 based on a voluntary withdrawal. The majority of the estimated withdrawal
liability results from plans for which the valuation date was December 31, 2008; therefore, the
companys estimated liability reflects the asset losses incurred by the financial markets as of
that date. In general, the financial markets improved during calendar year 2009; therefore,
management believes Syscos current share of the withdrawal liability could differ from this
estimate. In addition, if a multi-employer defined benefit plan fails to satisfy certain minimum
funding requirements, the IRS may impose a nondeductible excise tax of 5% on the amount of the
accumulated funding deficiency for those employers contributing to the fund. As of December 26,
2009, Sysco had approximately $17,000,000 in liabilities recorded in total related to certain
multi-employer defined benefit plans for which Syscos voluntary withdrawal had already occurred,
all of which are expected to be paid during fiscal 2010.
Fuel Commitments
From time to time, Sysco may enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of its
projected diesel fuel requirements. As of December 26, 2009, outstanding forward diesel fuel
purchase commitments totaled approximately $66,000,000 at a fixed price through December 2010.
13. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The company has aggregated its operating companies into a number of segments, of which only
Broadline and SYGMA are reportable segments as defined in the accounting literature related to
disclosures about segments of an enterprise. Broadline operating companies distribute a full line
of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to their customers. SYGMA operating
companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to
certain chain restaurant customer locations. Other financial information is attributable to the
companys other operating
segments, including the companys specialty produce, custom-cut meat and lodging industry
segments and a company that distributes to international customers.
The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those disclosed by Sysco for its
consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales represent specialty produce and meat company
products distributed by the Broadline and SYGMA operating companies. The segment results include
certain centrally incurred costs for shared services that are charged to our segments. These
centrally incurred costs are charged based upon the relative level of service used by each
operating
13
company consistent with how Syscos management views the performance of its operating
segments. Management evaluates the performance of each of our operating segments based on its
respective operating income results, which include the allocation of certain centrally incurred
costs.
Included in corporate expenses, among other items, are:
|
|
|
Gains and losses recognized to adjust COLI policies to their cash surrender values; |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense related to stock option grants, restricted stock
grants, issuances of stock pursuant to the Employees Stock Purchase Plan and restricted
stock grants to non-employee directors; and |
|
|
|
|
Corporate-level depreciation and amortization expense. |
The following table sets forth certain financial information for Syscos business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Sales (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline |
|
$ |
14,393,429 |
|
|
$ |
15,077,939 |
|
|
$ |
7,084,723 |
|
|
$ |
7,205,372 |
|
SYGMA |
|
|
2,308,174 |
|
|
|
2,460,809 |
|
|
|
1,157,313 |
|
|
|
1,232,574 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,495,543 |
|
|
|
1,726,797 |
|
|
|
752,666 |
|
|
|
831,057 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(247,221 |
) |
|
|
(238,313 |
) |
|
|
(126,203 |
) |
|
|
(119,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,949,925 |
|
|
$ |
19,027,232 |
|
|
$ |
8,868,499 |
|
|
$ |
9,149,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Operating income (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline |
|
$ |
1,009,924 |
|
|
$ |
995,124 |
|
|
$ |
500,900 |
|
|
$ |
471,714 |
|
SYGMA |
|
|
17,857 |
|
|
|
14,342 |
|
|
|
12,019 |
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
Other |
|
|
55,799 |
|
|
|
60,455 |
|
|
|
29,985 |
|
|
|
31,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
|
1,083,580 |
|
|
|
1,069,921 |
|
|
|
542,904 |
|
|
|
513,126 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(123,901 |
) |
|
|
(143,305 |
) |
|
|
(80,553 |
) |
|
|
(91,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
959,679 |
|
|
|
926,616 |
|
|
|
462,351 |
|
|
|
421,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
65,322 |
|
|
|
54,810 |
|
|
|
31,522 |
|
|
|
28,400 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(8,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
897,507 |
|
|
$ |
879,842 |
|
|
$ |
431,967 |
|
|
$ |
398,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Assets (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline |
|
$ |
6,046,959 |
|
|
$ |
5,706,431 |
|
|
$ |
5,869,963 |
|
SYGMA |
|
|
384,735 |
|
|
|
366,539 |
|
|
|
400,900 |
|
Other |
|
|
922,233 |
|
|
|
914,764 |
|
|
|
963,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
|
7,353,927 |
|
|
|
6,987,734 |
|
|
|
7,234,730 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,923,039 |
|
|
|
3,228,885 |
|
|
|
2,576,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,276,966 |
|
|
$ |
10,216,619 |
|
|
$ |
9,811,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
14. SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
Sysco International, Co. is an unlimited liability company organized under the laws of the
Province of Nova Scotia, Canada and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sysco. In May 2002, Sysco
International, Co. issued, in a private offering, $200,000,000 of 6.10% notes due in 2012. These
notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Sysco.
The following condensed consolidating financial statements present separately the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the parent guarantor (Sysco), the subsidiary
issuer (Sysco International) and all other non-guarantor subsidiaries of Sysco (Other Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries) on a combined basis with eliminating entries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
December 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
499,453 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
4,590,048 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,089,511 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
14,134,945 |
|
|
|
458,012 |
|
|
|
137,741 |
|
|
|
(14,730,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
301,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,771,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,072,721 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
482,452 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
1,631,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,114,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
15,417,868 |
|
|
$ |
458,783 |
|
|
$ |
9,131,013 |
|
|
$ |
(14,730,698 |
) |
|
$ |
10,276,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
416,043 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
2,366,771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,783,743 |
|
Intercompany payables (receivables) |
|
|
8,590,840 |
|
|
|
79,443 |
|
|
|
(8,670,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,219,095 |
|
|
|
199,847 |
|
|
|
49,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468,690 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
425,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094,246 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,766,780 |
|
|
|
178,564 |
|
|
|
14,715,641 |
|
|
|
(14,730,698 |
) |
|
|
3,930,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
15,417,868 |
|
|
$ |
458,783 |
|
|
$ |
9,131,013 |
|
|
$ |
(14,730,698 |
) |
|
$ |
10,276,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
937,335 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
4,333,308 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,270,679 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
13,293,437 |
|
|
|
403,363 |
|
|
|
165,197 |
|
|
|
(13,861,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
264,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,714,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,979,200 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
421,371 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
1,544,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,966,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
14,916,800 |
|
|
$ |
404,229 |
|
|
$ |
8,757,587 |
|
|
$ |
(13,861,997 |
) |
|
$ |
10,216,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
380,195 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
$ |
2,769,005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,150,154 |
|
Intercompany payables (receivables) |
|
|
8,533,159 |
|
|
|
54,785 |
|
|
|
(8,587,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,219,655 |
|
|
|
199,816 |
|
|
|
48,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467,486 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
413,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149,277 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,370,140 |
|
|
|
148,674 |
|
|
|
13,792,885 |
|
|
|
(13,861,997 |
) |
|
|
3,449,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
14,916,800 |
|
|
$ |
404,229 |
|
|
$ |
8,757,587 |
|
|
$ |
(13,861,997 |
) |
|
$ |
10,216,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
December 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
319,989 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,599,719 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,919,708 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
14,950,323 |
|
|
|
370,726 |
|
|
|
180,621 |
|
|
|
(15,501,670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
249,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,640,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,890,641 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
575,876 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1,424,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,001,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,095,865 |
|
|
$ |
371,640 |
|
|
$ |
8,845,587 |
|
|
$ |
(15,501,670 |
) |
|
$ |
9,811,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
423,587 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
2,869,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,293,209 |
|
Intercompany payables (receivables) |
|
|
10,202,526 |
|
|
|
42,659 |
|
|
|
(10,245,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,728,390 |
|
|
|
199,784 |
|
|
|
44,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,972,612 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
492,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251,589 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,248,697 |
|
|
|
128,641 |
|
|
|
15,418,344 |
|
|
|
(15,501,670 |
) |
|
|
3,294,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
16,095,865 |
|
|
$ |
371,640 |
|
|
$ |
8,845,587 |
|
|
$ |
(15,501,670 |
) |
|
$ |
9,811,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations |
|
|
|
For the 26-Week Period Ended December 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,949,925 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,949,925 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,507,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,507,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442,246 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
122,810 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
2,359,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(122,810 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
1,082,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959,679 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
241,130 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
(180,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,322 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
(363,580 |
) |
|
|
(5,137 |
) |
|
|
1,266,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,507 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(122,726 |
) |
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
427,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,953 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
835,408 |
|
|
|
27,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(862,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
594,554 |
|
|
$ |
23,790 |
|
|
$ |
838,811 |
|
|
$ |
(862,601 |
) |
|
$ |
594,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations |
|
|
|
For the 26-Week Period Ended December 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,027,232 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,027,232 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,390,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,390,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,636,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,636,669 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
140,605 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,569,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,710,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(140,605 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
1,067,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926,616 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
250,124 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
(201,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,810 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(2,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
(388,637 |
) |
|
|
(5,873 |
) |
|
|
1,274,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879,842 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(161,390 |
) |
|
|
(2,439 |
) |
|
|
529,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,374 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
741,715 |
|
|
|
27,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(769,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
514,468 |
|
|
$ |
23,979 |
|
|
$ |
745,149 |
|
|
$ |
(769,128 |
) |
|
$ |
514,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations |
|
|
|
For the 13-Week Period Ended December 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,868,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,868,499 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,173,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,173,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,887 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
77,748 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1,154,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(77,748 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
540,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,351 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
120,566 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
(91,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,522 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
(198,308 |
) |
|
|
(2,613 |
) |
|
|
632,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,967 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(73,262 |
) |
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
237,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,618 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
393,395 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(407,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
268,349 |
|
|
$ |
12,366 |
|
|
$ |
395,029 |
|
|
$ |
(407,395 |
) |
|
$ |
268,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations |
|
|
|
For the 13-Week Period Ended December 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,149,803 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,149,803 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,399,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,399,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750,113 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
90,790 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,237,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,328,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(90,790 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
512,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,864 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
125,804 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
(100,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,400 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
(215,864 |
) |
|
|
(3,320 |
) |
|
|
617,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,687 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(88,015 |
) |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
|
250,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,033 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
365,503 |
|
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
237,654 |
|
|
$ |
12,939 |
|
|
$ |
367,468 |
|
|
$ |
(380,407 |
) |
|
$ |
237,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows |
|
|
|
For the 26-Week Period Ended December 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(154,832 |
) |
|
$ |
23,891 |
|
|
$ |
274,940 |
|
|
$ |
143,999 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(87,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(261,750 |
) |
|
$ |
(349,301 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(248,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
$ |
(247,398 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
Intercompany activity |
|
|
57,742 |
|
|
|
(23,891 |
) |
|
|
(33,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(432,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,660 |
) |
|
|
(439,478 |
) |
Cash at the beginning of the period |
|
|
899,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,889 |
|
|
|
1,087,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of the period |
|
$ |
466,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
181,229 |
|
|
$ |
647,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows |
|
|
|
For the 26-Week Period Ended December 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(168,809 |
) |
|
$ |
23,929 |
|
|
$ |
706,629 |
|
|
$ |
561,749 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(18,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175,137 |
) |
|
|
(193,750 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(530,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(531,330 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,147 |
) |
|
|
(15,147 |
) |
Intercompany activity |
|
|
526,680 |
|
|
|
(23,929 |
) |
|
|
(502,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(191,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,987 |
|
|
|
(178,478 |
) |
Cash at the beginning of the period |
|
|
486,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,906 |
|
|
|
551,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of the period |
|
$ |
295,181 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77,893 |
|
|
$ |
373,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements as of
June 27, 2009, and the fiscal year then ended, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009.
Highlights
Weak economic conditions in the United States and Canada combined with lower consumer
confidence contributed to a difficult business environment in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010.
These factors negatively impacted financial results in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010. We also
settled an outstanding tax matter with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and recognized gains on
corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies, both of which positively impacted net earnings and
earnings per share.
First 26 weeks
|
|
Sales decreased 5.7% in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 from the comparable prior year
period primarily due to deflation and weak economic conditions and the resulting impact on
consumer spending. Deflation, as measured by changes in product costs, was an estimated 3.4%
during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010. |
|
|
Operating income increased to $959,679,000, a 3.6% increase over the comparable prior year
period, primarily driven by a decrease in operating expenses. Operating expenses declined 8.4%
primarily due to reduced payroll expense related to reduced headcount and lower incentive
compensation and a favorable comparison on the amounts recorded to adjust the carrying value
of COLI policies to their cash surrender values in both periods. Partially offsetting these
operating expense declines was the reduction in operating income caused by the decline in
sales mentioned above. |
|
|
Net earnings increased to $594,554,000, a 15.6% increase over the comparable prior year
period, primarily due to a decrease in the effective tax rate and the factors discussed above.
The effective tax rate for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted by the
one-time reversal of previously accrued interest related to the settlement with the IRS, the
non-taxable gains recorded on COLI policies and the reversal of valuation allowances on state
net operating loss carryforwards. |
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 were both $1.00,
an increase of 16.3% over the comparable prior year period. Both basic and diluted earnings
per share were favorably impacted by $0.09 per share in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 due
to the one-time reversal of interest accruals for the tax contingency related to the IRS
settlement and the gains recorded on the adjustment of the carrying value of COLI policies to
their cash surrender values. This compares to a $0.09 per share negative impact to earnings
per share in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 from the losses recorded on the adjustment of
the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values. |
Second Quarter
|
|
Sales decreased 3.1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the comparable prior year
period primarily due to deflation and weak economic conditions and the resulting impact on
consumer spending. Deflation, as measured by changes in product costs, was an estimated 3.5%
during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. |
|
|
Operating income increased to $462,351,000, a 9.6% increase over the comparable prior year
period, primarily driven by a decrease in operating expenses. Operating expenses declined
7.2% primarily due to a favorable comparison on the amounts recorded to adjust the carrying
value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values in both periods and reduced payroll
expense related to reduced headcount. Partially offsetting these operating expense declines
was the reduction in operating income caused by the decline in sales mentioned above. |
|
|
Net earnings increased to $268,349,000, a 12.9% increase over the comparable prior year
period. These increases were primarily due to the increases in operating income and a
decrease in the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal
2010 was favorably impacted by the non-taxable gains recorded on COLI policies. |
19
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were both $0.45,
an increase of 12.5% over the comparable prior year period. Both basic and diluted earnings
per share were favorably impacted by $0.01 per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 due
to the gains recorded on the adjustment of the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash
surrender values. This compares to a $0.05 per share negative impact to earnings per share in
the second quarter fiscal 2009 from the losses recorded on the adjustment of the carrying
value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values. |
Overview
Sysco distributes food and related products to restaurants, healthcare and educational
facilities, lodging establishments and other foodservice customers. Our primary operations are
located throughout the United States and Canada and include broadline companies, specialty produce
companies, custom-cut meat operations, hotel supply operations, SYGMA (our chain restaurant
distribution subsidiary) and a company that distributes to international customers.
We consider our primary market to be the foodservice market in the United States and Canada
and estimate that we serve about 17% of this approximately $215 billion annual market. According
to industry sources, the foodservice, or food-away-from-home, market represents approximately 48%
of the total dollars spent on food purchases made at the consumer level in the United States. This
share grew from about 37% in 1972 to nearly 50% in 1998 and did not change materially until 2008
when it declined to the current level of 48%.
General economic conditions and consumer confidence can affect the frequency of purchases and
amounts spent by consumers for food-away-from-home and, in turn, can impact our customers and our
sales. We believe the current general economic conditions, including pressure on consumer
disposable income, are contributing to a decline in the foodservice market. Historically, we have
grown at a faster rate than the overall industry and have grown our market share in this fragmented
industry.
Strategy
We intend to continue to expand our market share and grow earnings through strategies which
include growing our sales, lowering procurement costs, achieving productivity gains and enhancing
our technology platform. These strategies are described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 27, 2009.
We will continue to use our strategies to leverage our market leadership position to
continuously improve how we buy, handle and market products for our customers. Our primary focus is
on growing and optimizing the core foodservice distribution business in North America; however, we
will continue to explore and identify opportunities to grow our global capabilities in other
markets. As a part of our ongoing strategic analysis, we regularly evaluate business
opportunities, including potential acquisitions and sales of assets and businesses.
Business Transformation Project
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we made the decision to proceed with the development and
implementation of an integrated software system to support a majority of our business processes and
further streamline our operations. These systems are commonly referred to as Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) systems. ERP implementations are complex and time-consuming projects that involve
substantial investments in system software and implementation activities over a multi-year
timeframe. As is the case in most ERP implementations, we expect that the implementation of our ERP
system will require transformation of business processes in order to realize the full benefits of
the project.
We have substantially completed the design phase of our business transformation project and we
are currently building the underlying ERP system and processes. These activities will be followed
by testing, integration and implementation. We believe implementation will occur across the
majority of our Broadline and SYGMA operating companies beginning in fiscal 2011 and ending in
fiscal 2013. Although we expect the investment in the business transformation project to provide
meaningful benefits to the company over the long-term, the costs will exceed the benefits during
the early stages of implementation, including fiscal 2010.
We expect total cash outlay for the business transformation project to be approximately
$900,000,000. Approximately $250,000,000 to $275,000,000 of cash outlay is expected to be incurred
in fiscal 2010, of which approximately $160,000,000
20
to $175,000,000 will be capitalized. Through the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010, approximately
one-third of the projected cash outlay for the fiscal year has been incurred. A portion of each of
these amounts represents the cost of existing internal resources that were redeployed to work on
the project and thus does not represent new expense as compared to prior years. We believe the
impact from the business transformation project in fiscal 2010 will be a reduction of approximately
$40,000,000 to $50,000,000 in operating income or about $0.05 per share.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the components of the Results of Operations expressed as a
percentage of sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before
income taxes |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the change in the components of the Results of Operations
expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the comparable period in the prior year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period |
|
13-Week Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(60.8 |
) |
|
|
(78.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
21
Sales
Sales were 5.7% lower in the first 26 weeks and 3.1% lower in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 than the comparable periods of the prior year. Product cost deflation and the resulting
decrease in selling prices had a significant impact on sales in the first 26 weeks and second
quarter of fiscal 2010. Estimated changes in product costs, an internal measure of deflation or
inflation, were estimated as deflation of 3.4% during the first 26 weeks and 3.5% during the second
quarter of fiscal 2010, as compared to inflation of 7.6% during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009
and 7.0% during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The exchange rates used to translate our
foreign sales into U.S. dollars positively impacted sales by 0.3% compared to the first 26 weeks of
fiscal 2009 and 1.2% compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Sales from acquisitions that
occurred within the last 12 months offset the rate of sales decline by 0.6% for both the first 26
weeks and the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Our sequential quarterly sales trend demonstrated a continuing decline throughout most of
fiscal 2008, all of fiscal 2009 and into the first quarter of fiscal 2010, from a positive 8.5% in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008 to a negative 8.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The rate
of decline slowed in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to 3.1%, a result largely driven by
estimated product cost deflation of 3.5% for the quarter and improving case volumes in the latter
part of the second quarter. We experienced estimated product cost
inflation during the four quarters
of fiscal 2009 ranging from 0.5% to 8.3%. During the first two quarters of fiscal 2010, we have
experienced estimated product cost deflation of about 3.4%. We believe the weak economic
conditions, which are placing pressure on consumer disposable income, are constricting growth in
the foodservice market and, in turn, have contributed to a reduction in our sales. Continued
deflation and a weak economic environment will make it challenging to grow sales in fiscal 2010.
On a year-over-year basis, deflation pressures appear to be moderating from the levels we saw
during the early part of the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
We believe that our continued focus on the use of business reviews and business development
activities, commitment to quality, investment in customer contact personnel and the efforts of our
marketing associates and sales support personnel are key drivers to strengthening customer
relationships and growing sales with new and existing customers. We also believe these activities
help our customers in this difficult economic environment.
Operating Income
Cost of sales primarily includes product costs, net of vendor consideration and in-bound
freight. Operating expenses include the costs of facilities, product handling, delivery, selling
and general and administrative activities. Fuel surcharges are reflected within sales and gross
margins; fuel costs are reflected within operating expenses.
Operating income increased 3.6% in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 from the first 26 weeks
of fiscal 2009, and as a percentage of sales, increased to 5.3%. This increase in operating income
was primarily due to decreased operating expenses. Gross margin dollars decreased 5.4% in the
first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 from the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009, while operating expenses
decreased 8.4% in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010.
Operating income increased 9.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, and as a percentage of sales, increased to 5.2%. This increase in operating income
was primarily due to decreased operating expenses. Gross margin dollars decreased 3.2% in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the second quarter of fiscal 2009, while operating expenses
decreased 7.2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Gross margin dollars declined primarily due to lower sales, which reflected product cost
deflation in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to product cost
inflation in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2009. We may be negatively impacted
by prolonged periods of product cost deflation because we make a significant portion of our sales
at prices that are based on the cost of products we sell plus a percentage markup. As a result,
our profit levels may be negatively impacted during periods of product cost deflation, even though
our gross profit percentage may remain relatively constant. Gross margin dollars were also
impacted by lower fuel surcharges. Fuel surcharges were approximately $51,000,000 lower in the
first 26 weeks and $22,000,000 lower in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 than the comparable
periods of the prior year. Assuming that fuel prices do not greatly rise above recent levels
during the remaining portion of fiscal 2010, we expect fuel surcharges in the last half of fiscal
2010 to be more closely comparable to those in the corresponding period in the prior year.
Our operating expenses for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 were lower than in the comparable
prior year period primarily due reduced payroll expense related to reduced headcount and lower
incentive compensation and a favorable comparison on the amounts recorded to adjust the carrying
value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values in both periods. Our
22
operating expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were lower than in the comparable
prior year period primarily due to a favorable comparison on the amount recorded to adjust the
carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values in both periods and reduced payroll
expense related to reduced headcount.
Pay-related expense decreased by $94,776,000 in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 from the
comparable prior year period primarily due to reduced headcount and lower incentive compensation.
Pay-related expense decreased by $24,771,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the
comparable prior year period primarily due to reduced headcount. Headcount declines affecting both
periods resulted from both productivity improvements and workforce reductions commensurate with
lower sales. Based on our current headcount levels, we anticipate that the level of decline in
pay-related expense due to reduced headcount may decrease in the second half of fiscal 2010. As
well, the decrease experienced in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 related to lower incentive
compensation may reverse depending upon operating performance results for the remainder of fiscal
2010.
We adjust the carrying values of our COLI policies to their cash surrender values on an
ongoing basis. The cash surrender values of these policies are partially based on the values of
underlying investments, which include equity securities. As a result, the cash surrender values of
these policies will fluctuate with changes in the market value of such securities. The changes in
the financial markets resulted in gains for these policies of $26,341,000 and $5,189,000 in the
first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively. These gains compared to the
recognition of losses of $54,604,000 and $31,696,000 in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of
fiscal 2009, respectively. The performance of the financial markets will continue to influence the
cash surrender values of our COLI policies, which could cause volatility in operating income, net
earnings and earnings per share.
Syscos fuel costs decreased by $54,622,000 and $28,544,000 primarily due to decreased diesel
prices in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively, from the comparable
prior year periods. Syscos costs per gallon decreased 33.3% in the first 26 weeks and 34.1% in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively, from the comparable prior year periods. Syscos
activities to manage fuel costs include reducing miles driven by our trucks through improved
routing techniques, improving fleet utilization by adjusting idling time and maximum speeds and
using fuel surcharges.
We periodically enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected monthly
diesel fuel requirements. These commitments will result in either additional fuel costs or
avoided fuel costs based on the comparison of the prices on the fixed price contracts and market
prices for the respective periods. In the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2010, our
forward fuel purchase commitments resulted in an estimated $8,000,000 of additional fuel costs and
$3,000,000 of avoided fuel costs, respectively. In the first 26 weeks and second quarter of
fiscal 2009, our forward purchase commitments resulted in an estimated $32,000,000 and $23,000,000,
respectively, of additional fuel costs. As of December 26, 2009, we had forward diesel fuel
commitments totaling approximately $66,000,000 through December 2010. These contracts will lock in
the price of approximately 30% to 35% of our fuel purchase needs for the remainder of fiscal 2010
at prices slightly lower than the current market price for diesel. Assuming that fuel prices do
not greatly rise above recent levels during the remaining portion of fiscal 2010, we expect the
level of fuel cost decline in the last half of fiscal 2010 to be less than that experienced in the
first half of fiscal 2010.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a provision of $9,585,000 for a withdrawal
liability from a multi-employer pension plan from which union members elected to withdraw.
Net company-sponsored pension costs in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2010
were $19,420,000 and $8,992,000 higher, respectively, than in the comparable prior year periods,
due primarily to lower returns on assets of our company-sponsored qualified pension plan
(Retirement Plan) during fiscal 2009, partially offset by a increase in the discount rate used to
calculate our projected benefit obligation and related pension expense for fiscal 2010.
Net Earnings
Net earnings increased 15.6% in the first 26 weeks and 12.9% in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 from the comparable periods of the prior year due primarily to the impact of changes in income
taxes discussed below, as well as the factors discussed above.
The effective tax rate of 33.75% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted
by three items. First, we recorded a one-time income tax benefit of approximately $29,000,000
resulting from the one-time reversal of previously accrued interest related to the settlement with
the IRS (see Other Considerations for additional discussion). Second, the carrying values of our
COLI policies are adjusted to their cash surrender values. The gain of $26,341,000 recorded to
adjust
23
the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values in the first 26 weeks of
fiscal 2010 is non-taxable for income tax purposes and had the impact of decreasing the effective
tax rate for the period. Third, we recorded a tax benefit of approximately $5,000,000 for the
reversal of valuation allowances previously recorded on state net operating loss carryforwards.
The effective tax rate of 41.53% for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was unfavorably
impacted by two items. First, a loss of $54,604,000 recorded to adjust the carrying value of our
COLI policies to their cash surrender values in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009. Second, we
recorded a tax adjustment of approximately $11,000,000 to accrue for a previously unidentified tax
contingency arising from a tax audit. The effective tax rate for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009
was favorably impacted by a decrease in a tax provision for a foreign tax liability of
approximately $6,600,000 resulting from changes in exchange rates.
The effective tax rate of 37.88% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted
by the gain of $5,189,000 recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash
surrender values in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
The effective tax rate of 40.39% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was unfavorably
impacted by the loss of $31,696,000 recorded to adjust the carrying value of our COLI policies to
their cash surrender values in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The effective tax rate for the
second quarter of fiscal 2009 was favorably impacted by a decrease in a tax provision for a foreign
tax liability of approximately $5,700,000 resulting from changes in exchange rates.
Earnings Per Share
Both basic and diluted earnings per share increased 16.3% and 12.5% in the first 26 weeks and
second quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of the prior year. These
increases were primarily the result of factors discussed above, as well as a net reduction in
shares outstanding. The net reduction in average shares outstanding was primarily due to share
repurchases in fiscal 2009. The net reduction in diluted shares outstanding was primarily due to
share repurchases in fiscal 2009 and an increase in the number of anti-dilutive options excluded
from the diluted shares calculation.
Both basic and diluted earnings per share were favorably impacted by $0.09 per share in the
first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 due to the one-time reversal of interest accruals for the tax
contingency related to the IRS settlement and the gains recorded on the adjustment of the carrying
value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values. This compares to a $0.09 per share negative
impact to earnings per share in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 from the losses recorded on the
adjustment of the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values.
Basic and diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were both $0.45, an
increase of 12.5% over the comparable prior year period. Both basic and diluted earnings per
share were favorably impacted by $0.01 per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 due to the
gains recorded on the adjustment of the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender
values. This compares to a $0.05 per share negative impact to earnings per share in the second
quarter fiscal 2009 from the losses recorded on the adjustment of the carrying value of COLI
policies to their cash surrender values.
As discussed under Business Transformation Project, we believe the incremental impact to
diluted earnings per share from the business transformation project in fiscal 2010 will be a
reduction of approximately $0.05 per share.
24
Segment Results
We have aggregated our operating companies into a number of segments, of which only Broadline
and SYGMA are reportable segments as defined in the accounting literature related to disclosures
about segments of an enterprise. The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those
disclosed by Sysco for our consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales generally
represent specialty produce and meat company products distributed by the Broadline and SYGMA
operating companies. The segment results include certain centrally incurred costs for shared
services that are charged to our segments. These centrally incurred costs are charged based upon
the relative level of service used by each operating company consistent with how management views
the performance of its operating segments.
Management evaluates the performance of each of our operating segments based on its respective
operating income results, which include the allocation of certain centrally incurred costs. While a
segments operating income may be impacted in the short term by increases or decreases in margins,
expenses, or a combination thereof, over the long term each business segment is expected to
increase its operating income at a greater rate than sales growth. This is consistent with our
long-term goal of leveraging earnings growth at a greater rate than sales growth.
Included in corporate expenses, among other items, are:
|
|
|
Gains and losses recognized to adjust COLI policies to their cash surrender values; |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense related to stock option grants, restricted stock
grants, issuances of stock pursuant to the Employees Stock Purchase Plan and restricted
stock grants to non-employee directors; and |
|
|
|
|
Corporate-level depreciation and amortization expense. |
The following table sets forth the operating income of each of our reportable segments and the
other segment expressed as a percentage of each segments sales for each period reported and should
be read in conjunction with Business Segment Information in Note 13:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income as a |
|
Operating Income as a |
|
|
Percentage of Sales |
|
Percentage of Sales |
|
|
26-Week Period |
|
13-Week Period |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
Broadline |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
The following table sets forth the change in the selected financial data of each of our
reportable segments and the other segment expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the
comparable period in the prior year and should be read in conjunction with Business Segment
Information in Note 13:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period |
|
13-Week Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Sales |
|
Income |
|
Sales |
|
Income |
Broadline |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
23.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
25
The following tables set forth sales and operating income of each of our reportable segments,
the other segment, and intersegment sales, expressed as a percentage of aggregate segment sales,
including intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively. For purposes of these
statistical tables, operating income of our segments excludes corporate expenses of $123,901,000
and $80,553,000 in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2010, as compared to
$143,305,000 and $91,262,000 in the first 26 weeks and second quarter of fiscal 2009, that are not
charged to our segments. This information should be read in conjunction with Business Segment
Information in Note 13:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Week Period Ended |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating |
|
|
Sales |
|
Income |
|
Sales |
|
Income |
Broadline |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
93.2 |
% |
|
|
79.2 |
% |
|
|
93.0 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
Dec. 26, 2009 |
|
Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating |
|
|
Sales |
|
Income |
|
Sales |
|
Income |
Broadline |
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
92.3 |
% |
|
|
78.7 |
% |
|
|
91.9 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline Segment
Broadline operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of
non-food products to both traditional and chain restaurant customers. In the first 26 weeks of
fiscal 2010, the Broadline operating results represented approximately 80% of Syscos overall sales
and 93% of the aggregated operating income of Syscos segments, which excludes corporate expenses
and consolidated adjustments.
Sales
Sales were 4.5% lower in the first 26 weeks and 1.7% lower in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 than the comparable periods of the prior year. Product cost deflation and the resulting
decrease in selling prices had a significant impact on sales levels in the first 26 weeks and
second quarter of fiscal 2010. In addition, we experienced improving case volumes in the latter
part of the second quarter. Estimated changes in product costs, an internal measure of deflation
or inflation, were estimated as deflation of 3.5% during both the first 26 weeks and second quarter
of fiscal 2010, as compared to inflation of 7.8% during the first 26 weeks and 7.1% during the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. The weak economic environment has applied continued pressure to
consumer discretionary spending and overall restaurant traffic counts and has resulted in reduced
sales. The exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into U.S. dollars positively
impacted sales by 0.4% compared to the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 and 1.4% compared to the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. Sales from acquisitions that occurred within the last 12 months
offset the rate of sales decline by 0.8% for both the first 26 weeks and the second quarter of
fiscal 2010. Continued deflation and a weak economic environment will make it challenging to grow
sales in fiscal 2010. On a year-over-year basis, deflation pressures appear to be moderating from
the levels we saw during the early part of the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
26
Operating Income
Operating income increased 1.5% in the first 26 weeks and 6.2% in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 from the comparable periods of the prior year. Gross margin dollars decreased 4.6% while
operating expenses decreased 7.4% in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 as compared to the first 26
weeks of fiscal 2009. Gross margin dollars decreased 2.2% while operating expenses decreased 6.1%
in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Contributing to the gross margin declines were decreases of approximately $38,000,000 and
$16,000,000 in the fuel surcharges charged to customers in the first 26 weeks and the second
quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of the prior year due to less
usage of these surcharges in fiscal 2010. Expense performance for the first 26 weeks of fiscal
2010 was aided by operating efficiencies, such as reduced pay-related expense due to reduced
headcount, lower incentive compensation expense and reduced fuel cost. Expense performance for
the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was aided by operating efficiencies, such as reduced pay-related
expense due to reduced headcount, and reduced fuel cost. Fuel costs were $32,945,000 lower in
the first 26 weeks and $16,670,000 lower in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 than in the
comparable periods of the prior year. Assuming that fuel prices do not greatly rise above recent
levels during the remaining portion of fiscal 2010, we expect fuel surcharges in the last half of
fiscal 2010 to be more closely comparable to those in the corresponding period in the prior year.
Additionally, we expect the level of fuel cost decline in the last half of fiscal 2010 to be less
than that experienced in the first half of fiscal 2010.
SYGMA Segment
SYGMA operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of
non-food products to certain chain restaurant customer locations.
Sales
Sales were 6.2% lower in the first 26 weeks and 6.1% lower in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 than in the comparable periods of the prior year. The weak economic environment has applied
continued pressure to consumer discretionary spending and overall restaurant traffic counts and has
resulted in reduced sales.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $3,515,000 in the first 26 weeks and $2,298,000 in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 over the comparable periods of the prior year. Gross margin dollars
decreased 8.3% while operating expenses decreased 10.7% in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 from
the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009. Gross margin dollars decreased 6.2% while operating expenses
decreased 9.3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Contributing to the gross margin decline was a decrease of approximately $13,000,000 and $5,000,000
in the fuel surcharges charged to customers in the first 26 weeks and the second quarter of fiscal
2010, respectively, from the comparable periods of the prior year due to lower fuel prices in
fiscal 2010. The decline in operating expenses was primarily due to operational efficiencies in
both delivery and warehouse areas, including reduced payroll expense related to headcount
reductions. Also contributing to the decrease in operating expenses was a decrease of $9,908,000
in fuel costs in the first 26 weeks and $3,453,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from the
comparable periods of the prior year. Assuming that fuel prices do not greatly rise above recent
levels during the remaining portion of fiscal 2010, we expect fuel surcharges in the last half of
fiscal 2010 to be more closely comparable to those in the corresponding period in the prior year.
Additionally, we expect the level of fuel cost decline in the last half of fiscal 2010 to be less
than that experienced in the first half of fiscal 2010.
Other Segment
Other financial information is attributable to our other operating segments, including our
specialty produce, custom-cut meat and lodging industry products and a company that distributes to
international customers. These operating segments are discussed on an aggregate basis as they do
not represent reportable segments under the accounting provisions related to disclosures about
segments of an enterprise.
Operating income decreased 7.7% for the first 26 weeks and 5.4% for the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 from the comparable periods of the prior year. The decreases in operating income were
caused primarily by reduced sales in all segments and reduced operating income in all segments
except our specialty produce and lodging industry products segments. These decreases are
primarily attributable to the weak economic environment in the United States and Canada.
27
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Syscos strategic objectives require continuing investment. Our resources include cash
provided by operations and access to capital from financial markets. Our operations historically
have produced significant cash flow. Cash generated from operations is generally allocated to
working capital requirements; investments in facilities, systems, fleet, other equipment and
technology; acquisitions compatible with our overall growth strategy; and cash dividends. Any
remaining cash generated from operations may be invested in high-quality, short-term instruments or
applied toward the cost of the share repurchase program. As a part of our on-going strategic
analysis, we regularly evaluate business opportunities, including potential acquisitions and sales
of assets and businesses, and our overall capital structure. These transactions may materially
impact our liquidity, borrowing capacity, leverage ratios and capital availability.
We believe that our cash flows from operations, the availability of additional capital under
our existing commercial paper programs and bank lines of credit and our ability to access capital
from financial markets in the future, including issuances of debt securities under our shelf
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), will be sufficient
to meet our anticipated cash requirements over at least the next twelve months, while maintaining
sufficient liquidity for normal operating purposes. We have continued to maintain the highest
credit rating available for U.S. commercial paper. We believe that we will continue to be able to
access the commercial paper market effectively as well as the long-term capital market, if
necessary.
Operating Activities
We generated $143,999,000 in cash flow from operations in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010,
as compared to $561,749,000 in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009. The decrease of $417,750,000
between the two periods was driven by two unrelated events affecting income taxes that are
discussed further below. First, the IRS settlement had the effect of decreasing cash flow from
operations in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010. Second, the tax payment deferral related to
Hurricane Ike had the effect of increasing cash flow from operations in the first 26 weeks of
fiscal 2009.
Cash flow from operations in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was primarily generated by net
income, reduced by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities, an increase in inventory
balances, decreases in accrued income taxes and the net balances of other long-term liabilities and
prepaid pension cost, partially offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. Cash
flow from operations in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was primarily generated by net income,
reduced by decreases in accounts payable balances and accrued expenses, offset by changes in
deferred tax assets and liabilities and non-cash depreciation and amortization expense.
The increase in accounts receivable balances for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was
primarily due to a seasonal change in customer mix, partially offset by the sales decline. The
decrease in accounts receivable balances for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was primarily due to
the sales decline, partially offset by a change in customer mix. Due to normal seasonal patterns,
sales to multi-unit customers and school districts represented a larger percentage of our sales at
the end of each first 26 week period as compared to the end of each prior fiscal year. Payment
terms for these types of customers are traditionally longer than average.
The increase in inventory balances for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was primarily due to
higher inventory levels typically experienced at the end of the second quarter, partially offset by
the sales decline. Historically, we have experienced elevated inventory levels during the holiday
period which occurs at the end of the second quarter. Sales in the last weeks of the quarter are at
lower volumes due to the holiday period, which can build inventory levels. In addition, purchasing
levels are typically increased at the end of the quarter in anticipation of increased sales volumes
from the re-opening of schools after the holiday period. The increase in inventory balances for the
first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was primarily due to increase in volumes related to seasonal patterns
described above, partially offset by the sales decline experienced in the second quarter of fiscal
2009.
The increase in accounts payable balances for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was primarily due
to the seasonal growth in inventory discussed above. The decrease in accounts payable balances for
the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was primarily due to the sales decline and timing of payments
with vendors. In addition, accounts payable balances are impacted by many factors, including
changes in product mix, cash discount terms and changes in payment terms with vendors.
28
Cash flow from operations was negatively impacted by decreases in accrued expenses of
$16,974,000 for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and $149,811,000 for the first 26 weeks of fiscal
2009. The decrease in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was due to offsetting changes in multiple
accrued items, of which no item was individually significant. The decrease in the first 26 weeks
of fiscal 2009 was primarily due to the payment of the respective prior year annual incentive
bonuses and 401(k) matching contributions, partially offset by accruals for current year incentives
and 401(k) matching contributions. The effect of the payment of prior year annual incentive
bonuses and 401(k) matching contributions was also present in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010,
but the level of these payments was significantly lower than in fiscal 2009 due to the operating
performance trend in fiscal 2009. As such, this effect did not have a significant impact on the
decrease in accrued expense for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010.
Cash flow from operations for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 was negatively impacted by
changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities of $172,756,000 and a decrease in accrued income
taxes of $236,099,000. The main factor affecting both of these items, as well as cash taxes paid,
was the IRS settlement (discussed below in Other Considerations), which resulted in the payment of
taxes of $422,000,000 in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 for the settlement agreement as well as
higher estimated tax payments for ongoing operations in fiscal 2010. Cash flow from operations
for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was positively impacted by changes in deferred tax assets and
liabilities of $337,453,000, partially offset by a decrease in accrued income taxes of $68,877,000.
The main factor affecting the decrease in accrued income taxes in fiscal 2009, as well as cash
taxes paid, was the deferral of the first two federal estimated income tax payments of fiscal 2009
until the third quarter as a result of the IRS Disaster Relief for Hurricane Ike offered to
corporations affected by the storm. Total cash taxes paid were $759,704,000 and $73,830,000 in the
first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The net balances of other long-term liabilities and prepaid pension cost decreased $97,343,000
during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and increased $2,889,000 during the first 26 weeks of
fiscal 2009. The decrease in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 is primarily attributable to three
items. First, our liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreased as a result of the settlement
with the IRS. Second, our liability for deferred incentive compensation decreased due to
accelerated distributions taken by plan participants of all or a portion of their vested balances
pursuant to certain transitional relief under the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code. Third, pension contributions to our company-sponsored plans exceeded net
company-sponsored pension costs. The increase in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009 was primarily
attributable to pension contributions to our company-sponsored plans. This increase was partially
offset by the recording of net company-sponsored pension costs, incentive compensation deferrals,
increases to our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and an accrual for a multi-employer
pension plan withdrawal liability. We recorded net company-sponsored pension costs of $63,059,000
and $43,639,000 in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. Our
contributions to our company-sponsored defined benefit plans were $77,690,000 and $87,394,000
during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively. The difference in the
level of contributions in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 is due to the timing of
our contributions to the Retirement Plan. In fiscal 2010, we anticipate making quarterly
contributions to the Retirement Plan in the amount of $35,000,000 per quarter, of which $70,000,000
has been made through the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2009, we made a single annual
contribution of $80,000,000 to the Retirement Plan in the first quarter of the year.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 primarily included facility
replacements and expansions, investments in technology including our business transformation
project and fleet replacements. Capital expenditures during the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009
primarily included facility replacements and expansions, fleet replacements and the construction
of a fold-out facility. We expect total capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 to be in the range of
$600,000,000 to $650,000,000, which includes projected expenditures related to our business
transformation project.
Financing Activities
During the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010, there were no shares repurchased, as compared to
13,551,200 shares at a cost of $358,751,000 for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009. As of January
23, 2010, there was a remaining authorization by our Board of Directors to repurchase up to
9,386,600 shares.
Dividends paid in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 were $283,766,000, or $0.48 per share, as
compared to $264,687,000, or $0.44 per share, in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2009. In November
2009, we declared our regular quarterly dividend for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 of $0.25 per
share, which was paid in January 2010.
29
We have uncommitted bank lines of credit, which provide for unsecured borrowings for
working capital of up to $88,000,000, of which none was outstanding as of December 26, 2009 or
January 23, 2010.
As of December 26, 2009, our Irish Subsidiary, Pallas Foods Limited, had a 20,000,000 (Euro)
committed facility for unsecured borrowings for working capital expiring March 31, 2010, which
consisted of a 12,000,000 (Euro) overdraft and a 8,000,000 (Euro) revolver. In January 2010,
the 8,000,000 (Euro) revolver portion of the facility was discontinued, leaving the 12,000,000
(Euro) overdraft line portion of the facility with the same expiration date of March 31, 2010.
There were no borrowings outstanding under either portion of this facility as of December 26, 2009
or the remaining overdraft portion of the facility as of January 23, 2010.
Sysco and one of our subsidiaries, Sysco International, Co., have a revolving credit facility
supporting our U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs. The facility, in the amount of
$1,000,000,000, expires on November 4, 2012, but is subject to extension.
As of December 26, 2009, there were no commercial paper issuances outstanding. During the
26-week period ended December 26, 2009, aggregate commercial paper issuances and short-term bank
borrowings ranged from zero to approximately $1,820,000.
In September 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted
$200,000,000 of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2014 to floating rate debt. In October 2009, we
entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $250,000,000 of fixed rate
debt maturing in fiscal 2013 to floating rate debt. Both transactions were entered into with the
goal of reducing overall borrowing cost. These transactions were designated as fair value hedges
since the swaps hedge against the changes in fair value of fixed rate debt resulting from changes
in interest rates.
Other Considerations
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
As discussed in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, we contribute to several
multi-employer defined benefit pension plans based on obligations arising under collective
bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees.
Under current law regarding multi-employer defined benefit plans, a plans termination, our
voluntary withdrawal or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any underfunded
multi-employer defined benefit plan would require us to make payments to the plan for our
proportionate share of the multi-employer plans unfunded vested liabilities. Based on the
information available from plan administrators, which has valuation dates ranging from December 31,
2007 to June 30, 2009, we estimate our share of withdrawal liability on most of the multi-employer
plans in which we participate could have been as much as $174,000,000 as of December 26, 2009 based
on a voluntary withdrawal. The majority of our estimated withdrawal liability results from plans
for which the valuation date was December 31, 2008; therefore, our estimated liability reflects the
asset losses incurred by the financial markets as of that date. In general, the financial markets
improved during calendar year 2009; therefore, we believe our current share of the withdrawal
liability could differ from this estimate. In addition, if a multi-employer defined benefit plan
fails to satisfy certain minimum funding requirements, the IRS may impose a non-deductible excise
tax of 5% on the amount of the accumulated funding deficiency for those employers contributing to
the fund. As of December 26, 2009, we have approximately $17,000,000 in liabilities recorded in
total related to certain multi-employer defined benefit plans for which our voluntary withdrawal
had already occurred, all of which are expected to be paid in fiscal 2010.
Required contributions to multi-employer plans could increase in the future as these plans
strive to improve their funding levels. In addition, pension-related legislation requires
underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the
level of their underfunding. We believe that any requirements to pay such increased contributions,
withdrawal liability and excise taxes would be funded through cash flow from operations, borrowing
capacity or a combination of these items.
BSCC Cooperative Structure
Syscos affiliate, Baugh Supply Chain Cooperative (BSCC), is a cooperative taxed under
subchapter T of the United States Internal Revenue Code, the operation of which has resulted in a
deferral of tax payments. The IRS, in connection with its audits of our 2003 through 2006 federal income tax returns, proposed adjustments that would
have accelerated amounts that we
30
had previously deferred and would have resulted in the payment of
interest on those deferred amounts. Sysco reached a settlement with the IRS on August 21, 2009 to
cease paying U.S. federal taxes related to BSCC on a deferred basis, pay the amounts that were
recorded within deferred taxes related to BSCC over a three year period and make a one-time payment
of $41,000,000, of which approximately $39,000,000 is non-deductible. The settlement addresses the
BSCC deferred tax issue as it relates to the IRS audit of our 2003 through 2006 federal income tax
returns, and settles the matter for all subsequent periods, including the 2007 and 2008 federal
income tax returns already under audit. As a result of the settlement, we will pay the amounts
owed in the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts paid annually: |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$ |
528,000,000 |
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
212,000,000 |
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
212,000,000 |
|
Of the amounts to be paid in fiscal 2010 included in the table above, $422,000,000 was paid in
the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 and the remaining payments will be paid in equal installments
with Syscos remaining quarterly tax payments. Amounts to be paid in fiscal 2011 and 2012 will
be paid with our quarterly tax payments. We believe we have access to sufficient cash on hand,
cash flows from operations and current access to capital to make payments on all of the amounts
noted above.
Contractual Obligations
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009 contains a table that
summarizes our obligations and commitments to make contractual future cash payments as of June 27,
2009. Since June 27, 2009, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations,
except for a reduction of our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and related interest in the
first 26 weeks of fiscal 2010 due to our settlement with the IRS discussed above. As of December
26, 2009, we had a liability of $75,119,000 for unrecognized tax benefits for all tax jurisdictions
and $36,483,000 for related interest that could result in cash payment.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal
of our financial position and results of operations. These policies require our most subjective or
complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Syscos most critical accounting policies and estimates include those that
pertain to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, self-insurance programs, pension plans,
income taxes, vendor consideration, accounting for business combinations and share-based
compensation, which are described in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 27, 2009.
Accounting Changes
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No.
EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities, which was subsequently codified within Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 260, Earnings Per Share. This standard addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need
to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method. This standard was effective for Sysco beginning in fiscal 2010 and interim periods within
that year. All prior-period earnings per share data presented in filings subsequent to adoption
must be adjusted retrospectively to conform with the provisions of this standard. Early
application of this standard was not permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, which was subsequently codified within ASC
825, Financial Instruments. This standard amended previous guidance to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for
interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies. Prior disclosure requirements only applied
to annual financial statements. This standard was effective for
31
interim reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, which was the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for Sysco. We have included the
required disclosures for this standard in Note 4, Fair Value Measurements.
Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at
Fair Value. This update provides additional guidance, including illustrative examples, clarifying
the measurement of liabilities at fair value. This update is effective for the first reporting
period beginning after its issuance. We adopted the provisions of this update in the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Standards
Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements. This update requires some new disclosures and clarifies some
existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements codified within ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. The majority of the provisions of this update, including those
applicable to Sysco, are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. Early application of the provisions of this update is permitted. We will adopt
the applicable provisions of this update in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and are currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of these provisions will have on our consolidated financial
statement disclosures.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made herein that look forward in time or express managements expectations
or beliefs with respect to the occurrence of future events are forward-looking statements under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They include statements about:
|
|
|
Syscos ability to increase its sales and market share and grow earnings; |
|
|
|
|
the continuing impact of deflation and economic conditions on our business; |
|
|
|
|
trends in deflation; |
|
|
|
|
the implementation, expected benefits and costs, and expected impact on earnings per
share of our business transformation project; |
|
|
|
|
sales and operating income trends; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated multi-employer pension-related liabilities and contributions to various
multi-employer pension plans; |
|
|
|
|
source of funds for required payments under the IRS settlement; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of ongoing legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
continued positive results from our strategies; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated company-sponsored pension plan contributions; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated share repurchases; |
|
|
|
|
Syscos ability to meet future cash requirements, including the ability to access debt
markets effectively, and remain profitable; |
|
|
|
|
the application and impact of the adoption of certain accounting standards; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the financial markets on the cash surrender values of our COLI policies; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding trends in pay-related expense, headcount and incentive
compensation; |
|
|
|
|
fuel costs and expectations regarding the use of fuel surcharges; and |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding operating income and sales for our business segments. |
These statements are based on managements current expectations and estimates; actual results
may differ materially due in part to the risk factors set forth below and those discussed in Item
1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009:
|
|
|
risks relating to the foodservice distribution industrys relatively low profit margins
and sensitivity to general economic conditions and their effect on consumer confidence and
spending; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that we may not be able to compensate for increases in fuel costs and
inflation; |
|
|
|
|
the risk of interruption of supplies due to lack of long-term contracts, severe weather,
work stoppages or otherwise; |
32
|
|
|
Syscos leverage and debt risks, capital and borrowing needs and changes in interest
rates; |
|
|
|
|
the potential impact of product liability claims and adverse publicity; |
|
|
|
|
labor issues, including the renegotiation of union contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of financial market changes on the cash surrender values of our COLI policies
and on the assets held by our company-sponsored Retirement Plan and by the multi-employer
pension plans in which we participate; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that other sponsors of our multi-employer pension plans will withdraw or become
insolvent; |
|
|
|
|
that the IRS may impose an excise tax on the unfunded portion of our multi-employer
pension plans or that the Pension Protection Act could require that we make additional
pension contributions; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that prolonged product cost deflation may adversely affect our operations; |
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of acquisitions and integration of acquired companies, as well
as the risk that acquisitions could require additional debt or equity financing and
negatively impact our stock price or operating results; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in successfully entering and operating in international markets that have
political, economic, regulatory and cultural environments different from those in the U.S.
and Canada; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that the anti-takeover benefits provided by our preferred stock may not be
viewed as beneficial to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on technology and the reliability of our technology network; |
|
|
|
|
our plans and efforts for our business transformation project may not be successful
could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to the implementation of our business transformation project, including
the risk that the project may not be successfully implemented, may not prove cost effective
and may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of competition on us and our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the ultimate outcome of litigation; |
|
|
|
|
managements allocation of capital and the timing of capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
internal factors, such as the ability to increase efficiencies, control expenses and
successfully execute growth strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
with respect to share repurchases, market prices for the companys securities and
managements decision to utilize capital for other purposes. |
For a more detailed discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ from those
contained in the forward-looking statements, see the risk factors discussion contained in Item 1A
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009.
33
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our market risks consist of interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, fuel
price risk and investment risk. For a discussion on our exposure to market risk, see Part II, Item
7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks in our Annual Report on Form 10 - K
for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009. There have been no significant changes to our market
risks since June 27, 2009 except as noted below.
Interest Rate Risk
At December 26, 2009, we had no commercial paper issuances outstanding. Our long-term debt
obligations at December 26, 2009 were $2,477,128,000, of which approximately 81% were at fixed
rates of interest, including the impact of our interest rate swap agreements.
In September 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted
$200,000,000 of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2014 to floating rate debt. In October 2009, we
entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $250,000,000 of fixed rate
debt maturing in fiscal 2013 to floating rate debt. Both transactions were entered into with the
goal of reducing overall borrowing cost. The major risks from interest rate derivatives include
changes in interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in
interest expense due to market increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the
counterparties in such transactions. These transactions were designated as fair value hedges since
the swaps hedge against the changes in fair value of fixed rate debt resulting from changes in
interest rates.
As of December 26, 2009, the September 2009 interest rate swap agreement was recognized as a
liability within the consolidated balance sheet at fair value within other long-term liabilities of
$1,109,000. The fixed interest rate on the hedged debt is 4.6% and the floating interest rate on
the swap is three-month LIBOR which resets quarterly. As of December 26, 2009, the October 2009
interest rate swap agreement was recognized as an asset within the consolidated balance sheet at
fair value within other assets of $534,000. The fixed interest rate on the hedged debt is 4.2% and
the floating interest rate on the swap is three-month LIBOR which resets quarterly.
Fuel Price Risk
Due to the nature of our distribution business, we are exposed to the potential volatility in
fuel prices. From time to time, we will enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of
our projected monthly diesel fuel requirements. As of December 26, 2009, we had forward diesel fuel
commitments totaling approximately $66,000,000 through December 2010. These contracts will lock in
the price of approximately 30% to 35% of our fuel purchase needs for the remainder of fiscal 2010
at prices slightly lower than the current market price for diesel.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Syscos management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 26,
2009. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure. Management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on
the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 26, 2009, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, Syscos disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 26, 2009 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are engaged in various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully
adjudicated. These proceedings, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse
effect upon the consolidated financial statements of Sysco when ultimately concluded.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The information set forth in this report should be read in conjunction with the risk factors
discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2009, which
could materially impact our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the company. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known by the company or that are currently deemed to be immaterial also
may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We made the following share repurchases during the second quarter of fiscal 2010:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
(d) Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as Part |
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
(a) Total Number of |
|
(b) Average Price |
|
of Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased (1) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Programs |
Month #1
September 27 October 24 |
|
|
6,888 |
|
|
$ |
24.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,386,600 |
|
Month #2
October 25 November 21 |
|
|
14,699 |
|
|
|
27.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,386,600 |
|
Month #3
November 22 December 26 |
|
|
11,524 |
|
|
|
28.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,386,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
33,111 |
|
|
$ |
27.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,386,600 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All shares purchased were shares tendered by individuals in connection with
stock option exercises. There were no shares purchased as part of our publicly announced
program during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. |
On September 22, 2008, we announced that the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of
20,000,000 shares. Pursuant to this repurchase program, shares may be acquired in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions at the companys discretion, subject to market conditions
and other factors.
In July 2004, the Board of Directors authorized us to enter into agreements from time to time
to extend our ongoing repurchase program to include repurchases during company announced blackout
periods of such securities in compliance with Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on November 18, 2009. Four directors,
Jonathan Golden, Joseph A. Hafner, Jr., Nancy S. Newcomb and Kenneth F. Spitler, were elected for a
three-year term. Directors whose terms continued
after the meeting included John M. Cassaday, Judith B. Craven, William J. DeLaney, Manuel A.
Fernandez, Hans-Joachim Koerber, Phyllis S. Sewell, Richard G. Tilghman and Jackie M. Ward.
35
Other matters voted on included:
|
|
|
Approval of the 2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan; |
|
|
|
|
Authorization of amendments to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan; |
|
|
|
|
Approval of the material terms of, and the payment of compensation to certain executive
officers pursuant to, the 2009 Management Incentive Plan; |
|
|
|
|
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent accountants for
fiscal 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
An advisory proposal relating to our executive compensation philosophy, policy and
procedures. |
The final voting results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Votes Cast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Against/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
Matter Voted Upon |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Abstain |
|
Non-Votes |
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Golden |
|
|
446,744,468 |
|
|
|
63,611,115 |
|
|
|
1,408,888 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Joseph A. Hafner, Jr. |
|
|
452,633,232 |
|
|
|
40,448,082 |
|
|
|
18,683,158 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Nancy S. Newcomb |
|
|
452,101,410 |
|
|
|
40,984,829 |
|
|
|
18,678,482 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Kenneth F. Spitler |
|
|
490,573,063 |
|
|
|
19,882,770 |
|
|
|
1,308,888 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Approval of 2009 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Plan |
|
|
366,310,717 |
|
|
|
38,585,840 |
|
|
|
18,833,980 |
|
|
|
88,034,185 |
|
Authorization of Amendments to 2007
Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
337,735,244 |
|
|
|
66,296,888 |
|
|
|
19,698,989 |
|
|
|
88,033,601 |
|
Approval of Material Terms of, and the
Payment of Compensation to Certain
Executive Officers pursuant to, the
2009 Management Incentive Plan |
|
|
460,296,687 |
|
|
|
31,026,091 |
|
|
|
20,440,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of Independent Accountants |
|
|
503,461,572 |
|
|
|
7,632,805 |
|
|
|
670,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory Proposal Relating to the
Companys Executive Compensation
Philosophy, Policy and Procedures |
|
|
488,103,765 |
|
|
|
16,417,842 |
|
|
|
7,241,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
The stockholder proposal on healthcare reform described in Syscos proxy statement was not
presented by the stockholder at the meeting, so no vote was taken on the matter.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to
Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 1997 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized
shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 1, 2000 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing
authorized shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 27, 2003 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
Form of Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to
Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 1996 (File No. 1-6544). |
36
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sysco Corporation dated July 18, 2008, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of June 15, 1995, between Sysco Corporation and
First Union National Bank of North Carolina, Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 6, 1995 (File No.
33-60023). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 27, 1998 between Sysco Corporation
and First Union National Bank, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to
Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 5, 2004 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly
First Union National Bank of North Carolina), as Trustee, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4(j) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated September 22, 2005
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on
September 20, 2005 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17,
2009 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated February 13, 2007, by
and among Sysco Corporation and Sysco International Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Sysco Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed on February 6, 2008 (File No. 333-149086). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated May 23, 2002 between Sysco International, Co., Sysco Corporation and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed August 21, 2002 (File No. 333-98489). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
Letter Regarding Appointment of New Trustee from Sysco Corporation to U.S. Bank
National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 29, 2007 filed on February 5, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1#
|
|
|
|
2009 Board of Directors Stock Deferral Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2#
|
|
|
|
Description of Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors, including the
Non-Executive Chairman. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A to the
Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Annex B to the
Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
2009 Management Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex C to the Sysco
Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
15.1#
|
|
|
|
Report from Ernst & Young dated February 2, 2010, re: unaudited financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.2#
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgement letter from Ernst & Young LLP. |
37
|
|
|
|
|
31.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.1#
|
|
|
|
The following financial information from Sysco Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 2,
2010, formatted in XBRL includes: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December
26, 2009, June 27, 2009 and December 27, 2008, (ii) Consolidated Results of
Operations for the twenty-six and thirteen week periods ended December 26, 2009 and
December 27, 2008, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the
twenty-six and thirteen week periods ended December 26, 2009 and December 27, 2008,
(iv) Consolidated Cash Flows for the twenty-six week periods ended December 26, 2009
and December 27, 2008, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
tagged as blocks of text. |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By |
/s/ WILLIAM J. DELANEY
|
|
|
|
William J. DeLaney |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: February 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ ROBERT C. KREIDLER
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Kreidler |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: February 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ G. MITCHELL ELMER
|
|
|
|
G. Mitchell Elmer |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: February 2, 2010
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to
Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 1997 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized
shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 1, 2000 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing
authorized shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 27, 2003 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
Form of Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to
Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 1996 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sysco Corporation dated July 18, 2008, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of June 15, 1995, between Sysco Corporation and
First Union National Bank of North Carolina, Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4(a) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 6, 1995 (File No.
33-60023). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 27, 1998 between Sysco Corporation
and First Union National Bank, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to
Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 5, 2004 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly
First Union National Bank of North Carolina), as Trustee, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4(j) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated September 22, 2005
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on
September 20, 2005 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17,
2009 between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated February 13, 2007, by
and among Sysco Corporation and Sysco International Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Sysco Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of New York Trust
Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed on February 6, 2008 (File No. 333-149086). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated May 23, 2002 between Sysco International, Co., Sysco Corporation and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed August 21, 2002 (File No. 333-98489). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
Letter Regarding Appointment of New Trustee from Sysco Corporation to U.S. Bank
National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 29, 2007 filed on February 5, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1#
|
|
|
|
2009 Board of Directors Stock Deferral Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2#
|
|
|
|
Description of Compensation Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors, including the
Non-Executive Chairman. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
2009 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A to the
Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Annex B to the
Sysco Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
2009 Management Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex C to the Sysco
Corporation Proxy Statement filed October 8, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
15.1#
|
|
|
|
Report from Ernst & Young dated February 2, 2010, re: unaudited financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.2#
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgement letter from Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.1#
|
|
|
|
The following financial information from Sysco Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 2,
2010, formatted in XBRL includes: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December
26, 2009, June 27, 2009 and December 27, 2008, (ii) Consolidated Results of
Operations for the twenty-six and thirteen week periods ended December 26, 2009 and
December 27, 2008, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the
twenty-six and thirteen week periods ended December 26, 2009 and December 27, 2008,
(iv) Consolidated Cash Flows for the twenty-six week periods ended December 26, 2009
and December 27, 2008, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
tagged as blocks of text. |