e424b3
The
information in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus is not complete and may be changed. This prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus are not an offer to
sell these securities and are not soliciting an offer to buy
these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-152371
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT DATED DECEMBER 3,
2009
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated August 4, 2008)
2,400,000 Shares
Sterling Construction Company,
Inc.
Common Stock
We are offering to sell 2,400,000 shares of our common
stock. Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market, or Nasdaq, under the symbol STRL. The last
reported sale price on Nasdaq on December 2, 2009 was
$17.07.
We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to
360,000 additional shares of common stock to cover any
over-allotments. The underwriters can exercise this right at any
time within 30 days after the offering.
Investing in our common stock involves risks, including those
described under Risk Factors on
page S-8
of this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Discounts to underwriters
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Offering proceeds to us, before expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to
investors on or
about ,
2009.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is accurate or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
D.A. Davidson &
Co.
BB&T Capital
Markets
The date of this prospectus supplement
is ,
2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Prospectus Supplement
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
|
|
|
S-22
|
|
|
|
|
S-23
|
|
|
|
|
S-23
|
|
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
S-50
|
|
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
|
|
S-65
|
|
|
|
|
S-67
|
|
|
|
|
S-68
|
|
|
|
|
S-71
|
|
|
|
|
S-71
|
|
|
|
|
S-71
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
S-i
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
This prospectus supplement, which describes the terms of this
offering of shares of our common stock, supplements the
accompanying prospectus, which provides more general
information. Generally, when we refer to the prospectus, we are
referring to this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus combined. If the description of this offering varies
between this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus, you should rely on the information in this
prospectus supplement. This prospectus supplement contains
information about the shares of our common stock offered in this
offering and may add to, update or change the information in the
accompanying prospectus. Before you invest in shares of our
common stock, you should carefully read this prospectus
supplement, along with the accompanying prospectus, in addition
to the information contained in the documents incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement and referred to under
the heading Where You Can Find More Information.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement or in
any related free writing prospectus filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and used or referred to in an offering
to you of these securities. We have not authorized anyone to
provide you with different information. If anyone provides you
with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely
on it. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy,
shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers
and sales are permitted. The information contained in this
prospectus supplement is accurate only as of the date of this
prospectus supplement, regardless of the time of delivery of
this prospectus or any sale of our common stock. Our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects may
have changed since that date.
MARKET
DATA AND FORECASTS
Unless otherwise indicated, information in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus concerning economic
conditions and our industry is based on information from
independent industry analysts and publications, as well as our
estimates. Our estimates are derived from publicly available
information released by third-party sources, as well as data
from our internal research, and are based on such data and our
knowledge of our industry. None of the independent industry
publications used in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus were prepared on our or our
affiliates behalf, and none of the sources cited in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus have
consented to the inclusion of any data from its reports, nor
have we sought their consent. These industry publications
generally indicate that they have obtained their information
from sources believed to be reliable, but the sources do not
guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their information.
S-ii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. This
summary does not contain all of the information that may be
important to you. You should read this entire prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus carefully, including
the risks discussed under Risk Factors,
Cautionary Comment Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement
and the accompanying prospectus and incorporated by reference
herein and therein. In this prospectus, all references to
Sterling, Sterling Construction,
we, us, our and the
Company refer to Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or indicated by
the context. Beginning December 3, 2009, our subsidiaries
include Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC, or RLW
(including Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, Inc., its
predecessor prior to a statutory conversion).
Our
Company
We are a leading heavy civil construction company that
specializes in the building, reconstruction and repair of
transportation and water infrastructure. Transportation
infrastructure projects include highways, roads, bridges, light
rail and commuter rail. Water infrastructure projects include
water, wastewater and storm drainage systems. Sterling provides
general contracting services primarily to public sector clients,
including excavating, concrete and asphalt paving, installation
of large-diameter water and wastewater distribution systems;
construction of bridges and similar large structures;
construction of light rail and commuter rail infrastructure; and
concrete batch plant operations, concrete crushing and
aggregates operations. We perform the majority of the work
required by our contracts with our own crews and equipment.
Our business has a history of profitable growth, which we have
achieved by expanding both our service profile and our market
areas. This involves adding services, such as concrete
operations and design-build project delivery capabilities, in
order to capture a greater percentage of available work in
current and potential markets. It also involves strategically
expanding operations, either by establishing an office in a new
market, often after having successfully bid on and completed a
project in that market, or by acquiring a company that gives us
an immediate entry into a market.
We operate principally in Texas, Utah and Nevada, which are
three states that management believes benefit from both positive
long-term demographic trends as well as an historical commitment
to funding transportation and water infrastructure projects.
From 2000 to 2008, the populations of Texas, Utah and Nevada
grew 17%, 23% and 30%, respectively, compared to approximately
8% for the national average. Spending on highways and bridges in
2010 is budgeted or proposed at $4.2 billion by the Texas
Department of Transportation, or TXDOT, at $618 million by
the Utah Department of Transportation, or UDOT, and up to
$400 million by the Nevada Department of Transportation, or
NDOT. Management anticipates that continued population growth
and increased spending for infrastructure in these markets will
positively affect business opportunities over the coming years.
Prior to our acquisition of RLW, as discussed below, we had
revenues of $319 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, 4.4% higher than the same period in
2008. Over the same period, we had net income attributable to
Sterling common stockholders of $22.9 million, 61.2% higher
than results for the same period in 2008. As of
September 30, 2009, Sterling and RLW had aggregate backlogs
totaling approximately $569 million.
Ralph L.
Wadsworth Construction Company Acquisition
On December 3, 2009, we completed the acquisition of
privately-owned Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC, or
RLW, which is headquartered in Draper, Utah, near Salt Lake
City. RLW is a heavy civil construction business focused on the
construction of bridges and other structures, roads and
highways, and light and commuter rail projects, primarily in
Utah, with licenses to do business in surrounding states. We
paid approximately $64.7 million to acquire 80% of the
equity interests in RLW, and, in 2013, we have the
S-1
option to purchase, and the RLW sellers could require us to
purchase, the remaining 20% of RLW from four related individuals
who continue to manage the operations of RLW.
RLWs largest customer is UDOT, which is responsible for
planning, constructing, operating and maintaining the more than
6,000 miles of highway and over 1,700 bridges that make up
the Utah state highway system. RLW strives to provide efficient,
timely and profitable execution of construction projects, with a
particular emphasis on structures and innovative construction
methods. RLW has significant experience in obtaining and
profitably executing design-build and
CM/GC (construction manager/general contractor)
projects. We believe that design-build, CM/GC and other
alternative project delivery methods are increasingly being used
by public sector customers as alternatives to the traditional
fixed unit price low bid process. Approximately 89% of
RLWs backlog at September 30, 2009 was attributable
to design-build and
CM/GC
projects. Since its founding in 1975, RLW has experienced
profitable growth, capitalizing on high-quality execution of
projects and strong customer relationships.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, RLW generated
revenue, income before tax and EBITDA (earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $112 million,
$25 million and $26 million, respectively. We
purchased RLW based on an assumed sustainable annual EBITDA in
the range of $15 million to $20 million. EBITDA is not
a financial measure calculated in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the
U.S. (GAAP). See Summary
Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data for
a definition of EBITDA and a reconciliation of RLWs net
income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to
RLWs EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. As of September 30, 2009, RLW had a backlog of
approximately $198 million. See Selected Historical
Financial and Operating Data for information regarding how
backlog is calculated.
Among other reasons, we acquired RLW because we believe that it
offers us opportunities to:
|
|
|
|
|
expand on RLWs significant experience in design-build,
CM/GC and other project delivery methods;
|
|
|
|
utilize RLWs significant structural construction expertise;
|
|
|
|
expand into an attractive market with good long-term growth
dynamics;
|
|
|
|
complement our existing market locations and advance our
strategy of geographical diversification;
|
|
|
|
partner with a strong and innovative management team with a
similar corporate culture; and
|
|
|
|
benefit from RLWs strong financial results and immediate
accretion to our earnings per share.
|
Our
Business Strategy
Key features of our business strategy include:
Continue to Add Construction Capabilities. By
adding capabilities that augment our core contracting and
construction competencies, we are able to improve gross margin
opportunities, more effectively compete for contracts, and
compete for contracts that might not otherwise be available to
us.
Expand into Attractive New Markets and Selectively Pursue
Strategic Acquisitions. We will continue to seek
to identify attractive new markets and opportunities in western,
southwestern and southeastern U.S. markets. We will also
continue to assess opportunities to extend our service
capabilities and expand our markets through acquisitions.
Apply Core Competencies Across our Markets. We
will seek to capitalize on opportunities to export our Texas
experience constructing water infrastructure projects and our
Nevada earthmoving, aggregates and asphalt paving experience
into Utah markets. Similarly, we believe that RLWs
experience with design-build, CM/GC and other alternative
project delivery methods in Utah can enhance opportunities for
us in our Texas and Nevada markets.
S-2
Increase our Market Leadership in our Core
Markets. We have a strong presence in a number of
markets in Texas, Utah and Nevada and intend to expand our
presence in these states and other states where we believe
contracting opportunities exist.
Position our Business for Future Infrastructure
Spending. As evidenced by the federal
governments recently enacted economic stimulus
legislation, we believe that there is a growing awareness of the
need to build, reconstruct and repair our countrys
infrastructure, including transportation infrastructure, such as
bridges, highways and mass transit systems, and water
infrastructure, such as water, wastewater and storm drainage
systems. We will continue to build our expertise and seek to
capture this infrastructure spending.
Continue to Attract, Retain and Develop our
Employees. We believe that our employees are key
to the successful implementation of our business strategy, and
we will continue allocating significant resources in order to
attract and retain talented managers and supervisory and field
personnel.
Risks
Related to Our Business, Our Strategy, Our Common Stock and this
Offering
You should carefully read and consider the information set forth
below under Risk Factors and Cautionary
Comment Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, together
with all of the other information set forth in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, before deciding to
invest in shares of our common stock.
Our
Executive Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 20810 Fernbush
Lane, Houston, Texas 77073, and our telephone number at this
address is
(281) 821-9091.
Our website is www.sterlingconstructionco.com.
Information on, or accessible through, this website is not a
part of, and is not incorporated into, this prospectus
supplement.
S-3
The
Offering
|
|
|
Nasdaq Symbol |
|
STRL |
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
2,400,000 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering |
|
15,688,244 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will use the net proceeds of approximately $38.5 million from
the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and fees of
approximately $2.0 million in the aggregate and estimated
offering expenses of approximately $400,000: |
|
|
|
to repay indebtedness outstanding, if any, under our
$75 million revolving credit facility, which we refer to as
our credit facility; and
|
|
|
|
to strengthen our balance sheet, including our
working capital and tangible net worth, in order to fund our
business, provide liquidity for future growth and increase our
bonding capacity.
|
Each $1.00 change in the actual per share offering price from
the price assumed in this prospectus supplement would change by
approximately $2.3 million the amount of our net proceeds
available to strengthen our balance sheet after funding the
repayment of indebtedness, if any, referenced above. Each 10%
change in the number of shares of common stock sold in this
offering would change the net proceeds to us from this offering
by approximately $3.9 million, after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and offering expenses.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding before and
after this offering is based on the number of shares outstanding
as of December 1, 2009 and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
333,740 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon
the exercise of outstanding stock options at a weighted average
exercise price per share of $11.263; and
|
|
|
|
334,046 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon
the exercise of outstanding warrants at an exercise price per
share of $1.50.
|
Unless we indicate otherwise, the number of shares of common
stock shown to be outstanding after the offering, as well as
share, per share, holders of record, and financial information
in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
assumes a public offering price of $17.07 per share, which is
the last reported sales price per share of our common stock on
the Nasdaq on December 2, 2009;
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to
purchase up to 360,000 additional shares of our common stock to
cover over-allotments; and
|
|
|
|
does not give effect to the use of proceeds of this offering.
|
S-4
Summary
Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data
The following table sets forth our summary historical and pro
forma financial and operating data for the periods indicated.
The summary historical condensed consolidated statement of
operations and cash flow data for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, and the summary
historical condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. The summary historical
condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2006, have been derived from our audited
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, which
is not included in this prospectus supplement. The summary
historical condensed consolidated financial data as of and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, are
derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus
supplement.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as our audited consolidated
financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of
normal and recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for
a fair presentation of our financial position and operating
results for the unaudited periods. The summary financial and
operating data as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be obtained for a full year.
The summary pro forma condensed combined statement of operations
data for the year ended December 31, 2008 and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, gives effect on a pro forma basis
to the RLW acquisition as if it had been consummated on
January 1, 2008. The summary pro forma condensed combined
balance sheet information gives effect on a pro forma basis to
the consummation of the RLW acquisition, as if it had been
consummated on September 30, 2009.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Selected Historical Financial and Operating
Data, Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Information, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the financial statements and the notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
249,348
|
|
|
$
|
306,220
|
|
|
$
|
415,074
|
|
|
$
|
305,802
|
|
|
$
|
319,170
|
|
|
$
|
541,196
|
|
|
$
|
431,427
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
220,801
|
|
|
|
272,534
|
|
|
|
373,102
|
|
|
|
273,389
|
|
|
|
272,238
|
|
|
|
473,588
|
|
|
|
355,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
28,547
|
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
|
|
41,972
|
|
|
|
32,413
|
|
|
|
46,932
|
|
|
|
67,608
|
|
|
|
75,511
|
|
General and administrative expenses, and other
|
|
|
10,549
|
|
|
|
12,682
|
|
|
|
13,844
|
|
|
|
10,131
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
18,920
|
|
|
|
14,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,998
|
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
28,128
|
|
|
|
22,282
|
|
|
|
36,366
|
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
|
|
60,885
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
19,204
|
|
|
|
22,396
|
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
|
|
22,669
|
|
|
|
36,618
|
|
|
|
49,483
|
|
|
|
60,731
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
10,025
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
12,154
|
|
|
|
16,256
|
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
12,638
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
|
|
33,227
|
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
|
|
33,227
|
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(5,173
|
)
|
|
|
(6,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
28,054
|
|
|
$
|
34,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in computing
per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,583
|
|
|
|
11,044
|
|
|
|
13,120
|
|
|
|
13,102
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
13,120
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
11,714
|
|
|
|
11,836
|
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
13,703
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
28,466
|
|
|
$
|
80,649
|
|
|
$
|
55,305
|
|
|
$
|
62,094
|
|
|
$
|
62,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,028
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
26,169
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
|
|
17,383
|
|
|
|
41,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,041
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
62,874
|
|
|
|
82,063
|
|
|
|
95,123
|
|
|
|
93,561
|
|
|
|
115,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,178
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
167,772
|
|
|
|
274,515
|
|
|
|
289,615
|
|
|
|
296,713
|
|
|
|
308,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,420
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
30,782
|
|
|
|
65,654
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
60,575
|
|
|
|
40,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,501
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
76,781
|
|
|
|
135,903
|
|
|
|
130,499
|
|
|
|
142,952
|
|
|
|
125,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,352
|
|
Stockholders equity attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
|
90,991
|
|
|
|
138,612
|
|
|
|
159,116
|
|
|
|
153,761
|
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow data from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
23,089
|
|
|
$
|
29,542
|
|
|
$
|
26,721
|
|
|
$
|
18,929
|
|
|
$
|
43,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(52,358
|
)
|
|
|
(47,935
|
)
|
|
|
(42,923
|
)
|
|
|
(33,130
|
)
|
|
|
(20,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
35,468
|
|
|
|
70,576
|
|
|
|
(9,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
|
(15,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (unaudited)(1)
|
|
$
|
25,691
|
|
|
$
|
30,486
|
|
|
$
|
40,388
|
|
|
$
|
31,220
|
|
|
$
|
45,162
|
|
|
$
|
58,075
|
|
|
$
|
66,183
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
24,849
|
|
|
|
26,319
|
|
|
|
19,896
|
|
|
|
16,972
|
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
25,241
|
|
|
|
8,618
|
|
Backlog at end of period(2)
|
|
|
395,000
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
448,000
|
|
|
|
511,000
|
|
|
|
371,000
|
|
|
|
542,000
|
|
|
|
569,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA is defined as income attributable to Sterling common
stockholders before net interest income/expense, income tax
expense, and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is a non-GAAP
financial measure that we use for our internal budgeting
process, which excludes the effects of financing costs, income
taxes and non-cash depreciation and amortization. Although
EBITDA is a common alternative measure of performance used by
investors, financial analysts and rating agencies to assess
operating performance for companies in our industry, it is not a
substitute for other GAAP financial measures such as net income
or operating income as calculated and presented in accordance
with GAAP. Furthermore, we believe that the non-GAAP EBITDA
financial measure is useful to investors in providing greater
transparency to the information used by management in its
operational and investment decision making. Our non-GAAP
financial measures may be different from such measures used by
other companies. We urge you to review the GAAP financial
measures included in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus and our consolidated financial
statements, including the notes thereto, and the other financial
information contained in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus and incorporated herein and therein by
reference, and not to rely on any single financial measure to
evaluate our business. |
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income attributable to Sterling common
stockholders to EBITDA for each of the historical and pro forma
fiscal periods indicated is as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
28,054
|
|
|
$
|
34,795
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
9,757
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
14,560
|
|
|
|
11,719
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
(1,206
|
)
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
10,025
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
12,154
|
|
|
|
16,256
|
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
25,691
|
|
|
$
|
30,486
|
|
|
$
|
40,388
|
|
|
$
|
31,220
|
|
|
$
|
45,162
|
|
|
$
|
58,075
|
|
|
$
|
66,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of non-GAAP financial measures is subject to inherent
limitations because they do not include all the expenses that
must be included under GAAP and because they involve the
exercise of judgment as to which charges should be excluded from
the non-GAAP financial measure. EBITDA has material limitations
as a performance measure because it excludes (1) interest
expense, which is a necessary element of |
S-6
|
|
|
|
|
our costs and ability to generate revenues because we borrow
money to finance our operations, (2) depreciation, which is
a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate
revenues because we use capital assets, and (3) income
taxes, which we are required to pay. Management compensates for
these limitations by providing specific information regarding
the GAAP amounts excluded from EBITDA and by presenting
comparable GAAP measures more prominently in our disclosures. |
|
(2) |
|
Historical information does not include RHB backlog prior to
December 31, 2007 or RLW backlog. Pro forma backlog does
include RLW backlog of approximately $94 million as of
December 31, 2008 and $198 million as of
September 30, 2009. Backlog is our estimate of the revenues
that we expect to earn in future periods on our construction
projects. We generally add the anticipated revenue value of each
new project to our backlog when management reasonably determines
that we will be awarded the contract and there are no known
impediments to being awarded the contract. We deduct from
backlog the revenues earned on each project during the
applicable fiscal period. As construction on our projects
progresses, we also increase or decrease backlog to take into
account our estimates of the effects of changes in estimated
quantities, changed conditions, change orders and other
variations from initially anticipated contract revenues,
including completion penalties and bonuses. At
September 30, 2009, our pro forma backlog included
approximately $142 million of expected revenues for which
the contracts had not yet been officially awarded or finalized
as to price. Historically, subsequent non-awards of contracts or
finalization of price have not materially affected our backlog,
results of operations or financial condition. |
S-7
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves various risks.
Before making an investment in our common stock, you should
carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other
information contained in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, including our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. The risks described below are those we believe
to be the material risks we face. Any of the risk factors
described below could significantly and adversely affect our
business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations. As a result, the trading price of our common stock
could decline, and you could lose a part or all of your
investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
If we
are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks,
requirements or costs when we bid on or negotiate a contract
that is ultimately awarded to us, we may achieve a lower than
anticipated profit or incur a loss on the
contract.
The majority of our revenues and backlog are derived from fixed
unit price contracts. Some of our revenues are derived from lump
sum contracts. Fixed unit price contracts require us to perform
the contract for a fixed unit price based on approved quantities
irrespective of our actual costs. Lump sum contracts require
that the total amount of work be performed for a single price
irrespective of our actual costs. We realize a profit on our
contracts only if we successfully estimate our costs and then
successfully control actual costs and avoid cost overruns, and
our revenues exceed actual costs. If our cost estimates for a
contract are inaccurate, or if we do not execute the contract
within our cost estimates, then cost overruns may cause us to
incur losses or cause the contract not to be as profitable as we
expected. The final results under these types of contracts could
negatively affect our cash flow, earnings and financial position.
The costs incurred and gross profit realized on our contracts
can vary, sometimes substantially, from our original projections
due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
onsite conditions that differ from those assumed in the original
bid or contract;
|
|
|
|
failure to include materials or work in a bid, or the failure to
estimate properly the quantities or costs needed to complete a
lump sum contract;
|
|
|
|
delays caused by weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
contract or project modifications creating unanticipated costs
not covered by change orders;
|
|
|
|
changes in availability, proximity and costs of materials,
including steel, concrete, aggregates and other construction
materials (such as stone, gravel, sand and oil for asphalt
paving), as well as fuel and lubricants for our equipment;
|
|
|
|
inability to predict the costs of accessing and producing
aggregates and purchasing oil required for asphalt paving
projects;
|
|
|
|
availability and skill level of workers in the geographic
location of a project;
|
|
|
|
failure by our suppliers, subcontractors, designers, engineers,
joint venture partners or customers to perform their obligations;
|
|
|
|
fraud, theft or other improper activities by our suppliers,
subcontractors, designers, engineers, joint venture partners or
customers or our own personnel;
|
|
|
|
mechanical problems with our machinery or equipment;
|
|
|
|
citations issued by any governmental authority, including the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining required governmental permits or
approvals;
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws and regulations; and
|
|
|
|
claims or demands from third parties for alleged damages arising
from the design, construction or use and operation of a project
of which our work is part.
|
S-8
Many of our contracts with public sector customers contain
provisions that purport to shift some or all of the above risks
from the customer to us, even in cases where the customer is
partly at fault. Our experience has often been that public
sector customers have been willing to negotiate equitable
adjustments in the contract compensation or completion time
provisions if unexpected circumstances arise. Public sector
customers may seek to impose contractual risk-shifting
provisions more aggressively, and we could face increased risks,
which may adversely affect our cash flow, earnings and financial
position.
We may
be unable to sustain our historical revenue growth rate and
maintain our profitability.
Our revenue has grown rapidly in recent years. However, we may
be unable to sustain these recent revenue growth rates for a
variety of reasons, including decreased government funding for
infrastructure projects, limits on additional growth in our
current markets, reduced spending by our customers, an increased
number of competitors, less success in competitive bidding for
contracts, limitations on access to necessary working capital
and investment capital to sustain growth, limitations on access
to bonding to support increased contracts and operations,
inability to hire and retain essential personnel and to acquire
equipment to support growth, and inability to identify
acquisition candidates and successfully acquire and integrate
them into our business. Due to some of these factors, we
anticipate that our revenues and net income attributable to
Sterling common stockholders for 2010, before including the
results of operations of RLW, will be below, and could be
substantially below, the results that we expect to achieve for
2009. A substantial decline in our revenue could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations if we are unable to reduce our operating expenses at
the same rate.
Economic
downturns or reductions in government funding of infrastructure
projects could reduce our revenues and profits and have a
material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Our business is highly dependent on the amount and timing of
infrastructure work funded by various governmental entities,
which, in turn, depends on the overall condition of the economy,
the need for new or replacement infrastructure, the priorities
placed on various projects funded by governmental entities and
federal, state or local government spending levels. Spending on
infrastructure could decline for numerous reasons, including
decreased revenues received by state and local governments for
spending on such projects, including federal funding. The
nationwide decline in home sales, the increase in foreclosures
and a prolonged recession have resulted in decreases in property
taxes and some other local taxes, which are among the sources of
funding for municipal road, bridge and water infrastructure
construction. State spending on highway and other projects can
be adversely affected by decreases or delays in, or
uncertainties regarding, federal highway funding, which could
adversely affect us. We are reliant upon contracts with TXDOT,
UDOT and NDOT for a significant portion of our revenues.
Recent reductions in miles driven in the U.S. and more fuel
efficient vehicles have reduced federal and state gasoline taxes
and tolls collected. In addition, the federal government has not
renewed the SAFETEA-LU bill, which provided states with
substantial funding for transportation infrastructure projects.
Because the SAFETEA-LU bill expired on September 30, 2009,
the federal government rescinded a portion of the funding
previously committed to be provided to the states in 2009, with
interim financial assistance being extended on a
month-to-month
basis, most recently through December 18, 2009, at
approximately 70% of the prior year SAFETEA-LU levels.
Reductions in federal funding will negatively impact the
states highway and bridge construction expenditures for
2010. We are unable to predict when or on what terms the federal
government might renew the SAFETEA-LU bill or enact other
similar legislation.
While our business includes only minimal residential and
commercial infrastructure work, the severe fall-off in new
projects in those markets has resulted in some residential and
commercial infrastructure contractors bidding on smaller public
sector transportation and water infrastructure projects,
sometimes at bid levels below our break-even pricing.
Traditional competitors on larger transportation and water
infrastructure projects also appear to have been bidding at less
than normal margins in order to replenish their reduced
backlogs. These conditions have increased competition and
created downward pressure on bid prices in our markets. These
and other factors have limited our ability to maintain or
increase our backlog through successful bids for new projects
and have limited the profitability of new projects that we do
obtain through successful bids. These adverse competitive trends
may continue or worsen.
S-9
We
operate in Texas, Utah, Nevada and to a small extent in other
states, and adverse changes to the economy and business
environment in those states have had an adverse effect on, and
could continue to adversely affect, our operations, which could
lead to lower revenues and reduced profitability.
We operate primarily in Texas, Utah and
Nevada. Because of this concentration in specific
geographic locations, we are susceptible to fluctuations in our
business caused by adverse economic or other conditions in these
regions, including natural or other disasters. The stagnant or
depressed economy, to varying degrees, in Texas, Utah and Nevada
have adversely affected, and could continue to adversely effect,
our business and results of operations.
The
cancellation of significant contracts or our disqualification
from bidding for new contracts could reduce our revenues and
profits and have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Contracts that we enter into with governmental entities can
usually be canceled at any time by them with payment only for
the work already completed. In addition, we could be prohibited
from bidding on certain governmental contracts if we fail to
maintain qualifications required by those entities. A
cancellation of an unfinished contract or our debarment from the
bidding process could cause our equipment and work crews to be
idled for a significant period of time until other comparable
work became available, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operations.
Our
acquisition strategy involves a number of risks.
We intend to continue pursuing growth through the acquisition of
companies or assets that may enable us to expand our project
skill-sets and capabilities, enlarge our geographic markets, add
experienced management and enhance our ability to bid on larger
contracts. However, we may be unable to implement this growth
strategy if we cannot reach agreements for potential
acquisitions on acceptable terms or for other reasons. Moreover,
our acquisition strategy involves certain risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the integration of operations and systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulties applying our expertise in one market into another
market;
|
|
|
|
regulatory requirements that impose restrictions on bidding for
certain projects because of historical operations by Sterling or
the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
the key personnel, customers and project partners of the
acquired company may terminate or diminish their relationships
with the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
we may experience additional financial and accounting challenges
and complexities in areas such as tax planning and financial
reporting;
|
|
|
|
we may assume or be held liable for risks and liabilities
(including for environmental-related costs and liabilities) as a
result of our acquisitions, some of which we may not discover
during our due diligence;
|
|
|
|
we may not adequately anticipate competitive and other market
factors applicable to the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
our ongoing business may be disrupted or receive insufficient
management attention; and
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to realize cost savings or other financial
benefits we anticipated.
|
Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity
or debt financing, as well as additional surety bonding
capacity, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us
or at all. Moreover, to the extent that any acquisition results
in additional goodwill, it will reduce our tangible net worth,
which might have an adverse effect on our credit and bonding
capacity.
Our
industry is highly competitive, with a variety of companies
competing against us, and our failure to compete effectively
could reduce the number of new contracts awarded to us or
adversely affect our margins on contracts awarded.
A majority of the contracts on which we bid are awarded through
a competitive bid process, with awards generally being made to
the lowest bidder, but sometimes recognizing other factors, such
as shorter contract schedules or prior experience with the
customer. For our design-build, CM/GC and other alternative
methods
S-10
of delivering projects, reputation, marketing efforts, quality
of design and minimizing public inconvenience are also
significant factors considered in awarding contracts, in
addition to cost. Within our markets, we compete with many
national, regional and local construction firms. Some of these
competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we
have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater
financial and other resources than we do. In addition, there are
a number of national companies in our industry that are larger
than we are and that, if they so desire, could establish a
presence in our markets and compete with us for contracts.
In some markets where residential and commercial projects have
significantly diminished, the bidding environment in our markets
has been much more competitive as construction companies that
lack available work in those markets have begun bidding on
projects in our markets, sometimes at bid levels below our
break-even pricing. In addition, traditional competitors on
larger transportation and water infrastructure projects also
appear to have been bidding at less than normal margins in order
to replenish their reduced backlogs. As a result, we may need to
accept lower contract margins in order to compete against
competitors that have the ability to accept awards at lower
prices or have a pre-existing relationship with a customer.
In addition, if the use of design-build, CM/GC and other
alternative project delivery methods continues to increase and
we are not able to further develop our capabilities and
reputation in connection with these alternative delivery
methods, we will be at a competitive disadvantage, which may
have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations, cash flows and prospects. If we are
unable to compete successfully in our markets, our relative
market share and profits could also be reduced.
Our
dependence on subcontractors and suppliers of materials
(including petroleum-based products) could increase our costs
and impair our ability to complete contracts on a timely basis
or at all, which would adversely affect our profits and cash
flow.
We rely on third-party subcontractors to perform some of the
work on many of our contracts. We generally do not bid on
contracts unless we have the necessary subcontractors committed
for the anticipated scope of the contract and at prices that we
have included in our bid, except for trucking arrangements
needed for our Nevada operations. Therefore, to the extent that
we cannot engage subcontractors, our ability to bid for
contracts may be impaired. In addition, if a subcontractor is
unable to deliver its services according to the negotiated terms
for any reason, including the deterioration of its financial
condition, we may suffer delays and be required to purchase the
services from another source at a higher price or incur other
unanticipated costs. This may reduce the profit to be realized,
or result in a loss, on a contract.
We also rely on third-party suppliers to provide most of the
materials (including aggregates, cement, asphalt, concrete,
steel, pipe, oil and fuel) for our contracts, except in Nevada
where we source and produce most of our own aggregates. We do
not own or operate any quarries in Texas or Utah. We normally do
not bid on contracts unless we have commitments from suppliers
for the materials required to complete the contract and at
prices that we have included in our bid, except for some
aggregates we use in our Nevada construction projects. Thus, to
the extent that we cannot obtain commitments from our suppliers
for materials, our ability to bid for contracts may be impaired.
In addition, if a supplier is unable to deliver materials
according to the negotiated terms of a supply agreement for any
reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition,
we may suffer delays and be required to purchase the materials
from another source at a higher price or incur other
unanticipated costs. This may reduce the profit to be realized,
or result in a loss, on a contract.
Diesel fuel and other petroleum-based products are utilized to
operate the plants and equipment on which we rely to perform our
construction contracts. In addition, our asphalt plants and
suppliers use oil in combination with aggregates to produce
asphalt used in our road and highway construction projects.
Decreased supplies of such products relative to demand,
unavailability of petroleum supplies due to refinery
turnarounds, and other factors can increase the cost of such
products. Future increases in the costs of fuel and other
petroleum-based products used in our business, particularly if a
bid has been submitted for a contract and the costs of such
products have been estimated at amounts less than the actual
costs thereof, could result in a lower profit, or a loss, on a
contract.
S-11
We may
not accurately assess the quality, and we may not accurately
estimate the quality, quantity, availability and cost, of
aggregates we plan to produce, particularly for projects in
rural areas of Nevada, which could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Particularly for projects in rural areas of Nevada, we typically
estimate the quality, quantity, availability and cost for
anticipated aggregate sources that we have not previously used
to produce aggregates, which increases the risk that our
estimates may be inaccurate. Inaccuracies in our estimates
regarding aggregates could result in significantly higher costs
to supply aggregates needed for our projects, as well as
potential delays and other inefficiencies. As a result, our
failure to accurately assess the quality, quantity, availability
and cost of aggregates could cause us to incur losses, which
could materially adversely affect our results of operations.
We may
not be able to fully realize the revenue anticipated by our
reported backlog.
Backlog is our estimate of the revenues that we expect to earn
in future periods on our construction projects. We generally add
the anticipated revenue value of each new project to our backlog
when management reasonably determines that we will be awarded
the contract and there are no known impediments to being awarded
the contract. We deduct from backlog the revenues earned on each
project during the applicable fiscal period. As construction on
our projects progresses, we also increase or decrease backlog to
take into account our estimates of the effects of changes in
estimated quantities, changed conditions, change orders and
other variations from initially anticipated contract revenues,
including completion penalties and bonuses. Actual results may
differ from the expectations and estimates we rely upon in
determining backlog.
Most of the contracts with our public sector customers can be
terminated at their discretion. If a customer cancels, suspends,
delays or reduces a contract, we may be reimbursed for certain
costs but typically will not be able to bill the total amount
that had been reflected in our backlog. Cancellation of one or
more contracts that constitute a large percentage of our
backlog, and our inability to find a substitute contract, would
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel and skilled
labor, or if we encounter labor difficulties, our ability to bid
for and successfully complete contracts may be negatively
impacted.
Our ability to attract and retain reliable, qualified personnel
is a significant factor that enables us to successfully bid for
and profitably complete our work. This includes members of our
management, project managers, estimators, supervisors, foremen,
equipment operators and laborers. The loss of the services of
any of our management could have a material adverse effect on
us. Our future success will also depend on our ability to hire
and retain, or to attract when needed, highly-skilled personnel.
If competition for these employees is intense, we could
experience difficulty hiring and retaining the personnel
necessary to support our business. If we do not succeed in
retaining our current employees and attracting, developing and
retaining new highly-skilled employees, our reputation may be
harmed and our operations and future earnings may be negatively
impacted.
We rely heavily on immigrant labor. We have taken steps that we
believe are sufficient and appropriate to ensure compliance with
immigration laws. However, we cannot provide assurance that we
have identified, or will identify in the future, all illegal
immigrants who work for us. Our failure to identify illegal
immigrants who work for us may result in fines or other
penalties being imposed upon us, which could have a material
adverse effect on our operations, results of operations and
financial condition.
In Nevada, a substantial number of our equipment operators and
laborers are unionized. Any work stoppage or other labor dispute
involving our unionized workforce would have a material adverse
effect on our operations and operating results in Nevada.
Our
contracts may require us to perform extra or change order work,
which can result in disputes and adversely affect our working
capital, profits and cash flows.
Our contracts often require us to perform extra or change order
work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not
agreed in advance on the scope or price of the extra work to be
performed. This process may result in disputes over whether the
work performed is beyond the scope of the work included in the
original project plans and specifications or, if the customer
agrees that the work performed qualifies as extra
S-12
work, the price that the customer is willing to pay for the
extra work. These disputes may not be settled to our
satisfaction. Even when the customer agrees to pay for the extra
work, we may be required to fund the cost of such work for a
lengthy period of time until the change order is approved by the
customer and we are paid by the customer.
To the extent that actual recoveries with respect to change
orders or amounts subject to contract disputes or claims are
less than the estimates used in our financial statements, the
amount of any shortfall will reduce our future revenues and
profits, and this could have a material adverse effect on our
reported working capital and results of operations. In addition,
any delay caused by the extra work may adversely impact the
timely scheduling of other project work and our ability to meet
specified contract milestone dates.
Our
failure to meet schedule or performance requirements of our
contracts could adversely affect us.
In most cases, our contracts require completion by a scheduled
acceptance date. Failure to meet any such schedule could result
in additional costs, penalties or liquidated damages being
assessed against us, and these could exceed projected profit
margins on the contract. Performance problems on existing and
future contracts could cause actual results of operations to
differ materially from those anticipated by us and could cause
us to suffer damage to our reputation within the industry and
among our customers.
The
design-build project delivery method subjects us to the risk of
design errors and omissions.
In the event of a design error or omission causing damages with
respect to one of our design-build projects, we could be liable.
Although we pass design responsibility on to the engineering
firms that we engage to perform design services on our behalf
for these projects, in the event of a design error or omission
causing damages, there is risk that the engineering firm, its
professional liability insurance, and the errors and omissions
insurance that they and we purchase will not fully protect us
from costs or liabilities. Any liabilities resulting from an
asserted design defect with respect to our construction projects
may have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
Adverse
weather conditions may cause delays, which could slow completion
of our contracts and negatively affect our revenues and cash
flow.
Because all of our construction projects are built outdoors,
work on our contracts is subject to unpredictable weather
conditions, which could become more frequent or severe if
general climatic changes occur. For example, evacuations in
Texas due to Hurricanes Rita and Ike resulted in our inability
to perform work on all Houston-area contracts for several days.
Lengthy periods of wet or cold winter weather will generally
interrupt construction, and this can lead to under-utilization
of crews and equipment, resulting in less efficient rates of
overhead recovery. For example, during the first nine months of
2007, we experienced an above-average number of days and amount
of rainfall across our Texas markets, which impeded our ability
to work on construction projects and reduced our gross profit.
During the late fall to early spring months of the year, our
work on construction projects in Nevada and Utah may also be
curtailed because of snow and other work-limiting weather. While
revenues can be recovered following a period of bad weather, it
is generally impossible to recover the cost of inefficiencies,
and significant periods of bad weather typically reduce
profitability of affected contracts both in the current period
and during the future life of affected contracts. Such
reductions in contract profitability negatively affect our
results of operations in current and future periods until the
affected contracts are completed.
Timing
of the award and performance of new contracts could have an
adverse effect on our operating results and cash
flow.
It is generally very difficult to predict whether and when new
contracts will be offered for tender, as these contracts
frequently involve a lengthy and complex design and bidding
process, which is affected by a number of factors, such as
market conditions, funding arrangements and governmental
approvals. Because of these factors, our results of operations
and cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to
year, and the fluctuation may be substantial.
The uncertainty of the timing of contract awards may also
present difficulties in matching the size of our equipment fleet
and work crews with contract needs. In some cases, we may
maintain and bear the cost of
S-13
more equipment and ready work crews than are currently required,
in anticipation of future needs for existing contracts or
expected future contracts. If a contract is delayed or an
expected contract award is not received, we would incur costs
that could have a material adverse effect on our anticipated
profit.
In addition, the timing of the revenues, earnings and cash flows
from our contracts can be delayed by a number of factors,
including adverse weather conditions, such as prolonged or
intense periods of rain, snow, storms or flooding; delays in
receiving material and equipment from suppliers and services
from subcontractors; and changes in the scope of work to be
performed. Such delays, if they occur, could have adverse
effects on our operating results for current and future periods
until the affected contracts are completed.
Our
participation in construction joint ventures exposes us to
liability and/or harm to our reputation for failures of our
partners.
As part of our business, we are a party to joint venture
arrangements, pursuant to which we typically jointly bid on and
execute particular projects with other companies in the
construction industry. Success on these joint projects depends
upon managing the risks discussed in the various risks described
in these Risk Factors and on whether our joint
venture partners satisfy their contractual obligations.
We and our joint venture partners are generally jointly and
severally liable for all liabilities and obligations of our
joint ventures. If a joint venture partner fails to perform or
is financially unable to bear its portion of required capital
contributions or other obligations, including liabilities
stemming from lawsuits, we could be required to make additional
investments, provide additional services or pay more than our
proportionate share of a liability to make up for our
partners shortfall. Furthermore, if we are unable to
adequately address our partners performance issues, the
customer may terminate the project, which could result in legal
liability to us, harm our reputation and reduce our profit on a
project.
In connection with acquisitions, including the RLW acquisition,
certain counterparties to joint venture arrangements, which may
include our historical direct competitors, may not desire to
continue such arrangements with us and may terminate the joint
venture arrangements or not enter into new arrangements. Any
termination of a joint venture arrangement could cause us to
reduce our backlog and could materially and adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our
dependence on a limited number of customers could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Due to the size and nature of our construction contracts, one or
a few customers have in the past and may in the future represent
a substantial portion of our consolidated revenues and gross
profits in any one year or over a period of several consecutive
years. For example, in 2008, approximately 54% of our revenue in
Texas was generated from three customers, approximately 95% of
our revenue in Nevada was generated from one customer and
approximately 75% of RLWs revenue in Utah was generated
from one customer. Similarly, our backlog frequently reflects
multiple contracts for individual customers; therefore, one
customer may comprise a significant percentage of backlog at a
certain point in time. An example of this is TXDOT, with which
we had 14 contracts in our backlog at December 31, 2008.
The loss of business from any one of such customers could have a
material adverse effect on our business or results of
operations. Because we do not maintain any reserves for payment
defaults by customers, a default or delay in payment on a
significant scale could materially adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may
incur higher costs to lease, acquire and maintain equipment
necessary for our operations, and the market value of our owned
equipment may decline.
We have traditionally owned most of the construction equipment
used to build our projects. To the extent that we are unable to
buy construction equipment necessary for our needs, either due
to a lack of available funding or equipment shortages in the
marketplace, we may be forced to rent equipment on a short-term
basis, which could increase the costs of performing our
contracts.
The equipment that we own or lease requires continuous
maintenance, for which we maintain our own repair facilities. If
we are unable to continue to maintain the equipment in our
fleet, we may be forced to obtain third-party repair services,
which could increase our costs. In addition, the market value of
our equipment may unexpectedly decline at a faster rate than
anticipated.
S-14
An
inability to obtain bonding could limit the aggregate dollar
amount of contracts that we are able to pursue.
As is customary in the construction business, we are required to
provide surety bonds to our customers to secure our performance
under construction contracts. Our ability to obtain surety bonds
primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past
performance, management expertise and reputation and certain
external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety
market. Surety companies consider such factors in relationship
to the amount of our backlog and their underwriting standards,
which may change from time to time. Events that adversely affect
the insurance and bonding markets generally may result in
bonding becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or
being available only at a significantly greater cost. Our
inability to obtain adequate bonding, and, as a result, to bid
on new contracts, could have a material adverse effect on our
future revenues and business prospects.
Our
operations are subject to hazards that may cause personal injury
or property damage, thereby subjecting us to liabilities and
possible losses, which may not be covered by
insurance.
Our workers are subject to the usual hazards associated with
providing construction and related services on construction
sites, plants and quarries. Operating hazards can cause personal
injury and loss of life, damage to or destruction of property,
plant and equipment and environmental damage. Except for RLW,
which has workers compensation insurance, we self-insure our
workers compensation and health claims, subject to
stop-loss insurance coverage. We also maintain insurance
coverage in amounts and against the risks that we believe are
consistent with industry practice, but this insurance may not be
adequate to cover all losses or liabilities that we may incur in
our operations.
Insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due
to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the
determination of our liability in proportion to other parties,
the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of
our safety program. If we were to experience insurance claims or
costs above our estimates, we might also be required to use
working capital to satisfy these claims rather than to maintain
or expand our operations. To the extent that we experience a
material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or
workers compensation and health claims, or unfavorable
developments on existing claims, our operating results and
financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Environmental
and other regulatory matters could adversely affect our ability
to conduct our business and could require expenditures that
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and
regulations relating to the management, disposal and remediation
of hazardous substances and the emission and discharge of
pollutants into the air and water. We could be held liable for
such contamination created not only from our own activities but
also from the historical activities of others on our project
sites or on properties that we acquire or lease. Our operations
are also subject to laws and regulations relating to workplace
safety and worker health, which, among other things, regulate
employee exposure to hazardous substances. Immigration laws
require us to take certain steps intended to confirm the legal
status of our immigrant labor force, but we may nonetheless
unknowingly employ illegal immigrants. Violations of such laws
and regulations could subject us to substantial fines and
penalties, cleanup costs, third-party property damage or
personal injury claims. In addition, these laws and regulations
have become, and enforcement practices and compliance standards
are becoming, increasingly stringent. Moreover, we cannot
predict the nature, scope or effect of legislation or regulatory
requirements that could be imposed, or how existing or future
laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, with
respect to products or activities to which they have not been
previously applied. Compliance with more stringent laws or
regulations, as well as more vigorous enforcement policies of
the regulatory agencies, could require us to make substantial
expenditures for, among other things, pollution control systems
and other equipment that we do not currently possess, or the
acquisition or modification of permits applicable to our
activities.
Our aggregate quarry lease in Nevada could subject us to costs
and liabilities. As lessee and operator of the quarry, we could
be held responsible for any contamination or regulatory
violations resulting from
S-15
activities or operations at the quarry. Any such costs and
liabilities could be significant and could materially and
adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Terrorist
attacks have impacted, and could continue to negatively impact,
the U.S. economy and the markets in which we
operate.
Terrorist attacks, like those that occurred on
September 11, 2001, have contributed to economic
instability in the United States, and further acts of terrorism,
violence or war could affect the markets in which we operate,
our business and our expectations. Armed hostilities may
increase, or terrorist attacks, or responses from the United
States, may lead to further acts of terrorism and civil
disturbances in the United States or elsewhere, which may
further contribute to economic instability in the United States.
These attacks or armed conflicts may affect our operations or
those of our customers or suppliers and could impact our
revenues, our production capability and our ability to complete
contracts in a timely manner.
Risks
Related to Our Financial Results and Financing Plans
Actual
results could differ from the estimates and assumptions that we
use to prepare our financial statements.
To prepare financial statements in conformity with GAAP,
management is required to make estimates and assumptions, as of
the date of the financial statements, which affect the reported
values of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas
requiring significant estimates by our management include:
contract costs and profits and application of
percentage-of-completion
accounting and revenue recognition of contract change order
claims; provisions for uncollectible receivables and customer
claims and recoveries of costs from subcontractors, suppliers
and others; impairment of long-term assets; valuation of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with business
combinations; accruals for estimated liabilities, including
litigation and insurance reserves; and stock-based compensation.
Our actual results could differ from, and could require
adjustments to, those estimates.
In particular, as is more fully discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies, we recognize contract revenue using
the
percentage-of-completion
method. Under this method, estimated contract revenue is
recognized by applying the percentage of completion of the
contract for the period (based on the ratio of costs incurred to
total estimated costs of a contract) to the total estimated
revenue for the contract. Estimated contract losses are
recognized in full when determined. Contract revenue and total
cost estimates are reviewed and revised on a continuous basis as
the work progresses and as change orders are initiated or
approved, and adjustments based upon the percentage of
completion are reflected in contract revenue in the accounting
period when these estimates are revised. To the extent that
these adjustments result in an increase, a reduction or an
elimination of previously reported contract profit, we recognize
a credit or a charge against current earnings, which could be
material.
We may
need to raise additional capital in the future for working
capital, capital expenditures and/or acquisitions, and we may
not be able to do so on favorable terms or at all, which would
impair our ability to operate our business or achieve our growth
objectives.
Our ability to obtain additional financing in the future will
depend in part upon prevailing credit and equity market
conditions, as well as conditions in our business and our
operating results; such factors may adversely affect our efforts
to arrange additional financing on terms satisfactory to us. We
have pledged the proceeds and other rights under our
construction contracts to our bond surety, and we have pledged
substantially all of our other assets as collateral in
connection with our credit facility and mortgage debt. As a
result, we may have difficulty in obtaining additional financing
in the future if such financing requires us to pledge assets as
collateral. In addition, under our credit facility, we must
obtain the consent of our lenders to incur any amount of
additional debt from other sources (subject to certain
exceptions). If future financing is obtained by the issuance of
additional shares of common stock, our stockholders may suffer
dilution. If adequate funds are not available, or are not
available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to make future
investments, take advantage of acquisitions or other
opportunities, or respond to competitive challenges.
S-16
We are
subject to financial and other covenants under our credit
facility that could limit our flexibility in managing our
business.
We have a credit facility that restricts us from engaging in
certain activities, including restrictions on our ability
(subject to certain exceptions) to:
|
|
|
|
|
make distributions, pay dividends and buy back shares;
|
|
|
|
incur liens or encumbrances;
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
guarantee obligations;
|
|
|
|
dispose of a material portion of assets or otherwise engage in a
merger with a third party;
|
|
|
|
make acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
incur losses for two consecutive quarters.
|
Our credit facility contains financial covenants that require us
to maintain specified fixed charge coverage ratios, asset ratios
and leverage ratios, and to maintain specified levels of
tangible net worth. Our ability to borrow funds for any purpose
will depend on our satisfying these tests. If we are unable to
meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with
any of the other restrictions contained in our credit facility,
an event of default could occur. An event of default, if not
waived by our lenders, could result in the acceleration of any
outstanding indebtedness, causing such debt to become
immediately due and payable. If such an acceleration occurs, we
may not be able to repay such indebtedness on a timely basis.
Acceleration of our credit facility could result in foreclosure
on and loss of our operating assets. In the event of such
foreclosure, we would be unable to conduct our business and
forced to discontinue operations.
If we
were required to write down all or part of our goodwill, our net
earnings and net worth could be materially and adversely
affected.
We had $57.0 million of goodwill recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009. Based on
a preliminary allocation of the purchase price, we added
approximately $59 million of goodwill to our balance sheet
as a result of the RLW acquisition. Goodwill represents the
excess of cost over the fair market value of net assets acquired
in business combinations. If our market capitalization drops
significantly below the amount of net equity recorded on our
balance sheet, it might indicate a decline in our fair value and
would require us to further evaluate whether our goodwill has
been impaired. We perform an annual review of our goodwill and
intangible assets to determine if they have become impaired,
which would require us to write down the impaired portion of
these assets. If we were required to write down all or a
significant part of our goodwill, our net earnings and net worth
could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock and This Offering
Market
prices of our common stock have changed significantly and could
change further.
The market price of our common stock may decline from its
current levels in response to various factors and events beyond
our control, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a shortfall in operating revenue or net income from that
expected by securities analysts and investors;
|
|
|
|
changes in securities analysts estimates of our financial
performance or the financial performance of our competitors or
companies in our industry generally;
|
|
|
|
general conditions in our industry, including levels of
government funding for infrastructure projects;
|
|
|
|
announcements of significant contracts by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that
affect us adversely;
|
|
|
|
general conditions in the securities markets;
|
|
|
|
the limited trading volume of our common stock;
|
S-17
|
|
|
|
|
our issuance of a significant number of shares of our common
stock, including upon exercise of employee stock options or
warrants; and
|
|
|
|
the other risk factors described herein.
|
Limited
trading volume of our common stock may contribute to its price
volatility.
The average daily trading volume for our common stock as
reported by the Nasdaq during the first eleven months of 2009
was approximately 143,000 shares. Even if we achieve a
wider dissemination by means of the shares offered pursuant to
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, we
are uncertain as to whether a more active trading market in our
common stock will develop. As a result, relatively small trades
may have a significant impact on the price of our common stock.
Fluctuations
in our revenues, operating results and backlog may lead to
reduced prices for our common stock.
Because our operating results are primarily generated from a
limited number of significant construction contracts, operating
results in any given fiscal quarter can vary depending on the
progress achieved and changes in the estimated profitability of
those particular contracts being reported. Progress on contracts
may also be delayed by unanticipated adverse weather conditions.
Such delays, if they occur, may result in fluctuating quarterly
operating results and reduced profitability, which may in turn
lead to reduced prices for our common stock.
Various factors described in this prospectus supplement and the
documents incorporated herein by reference have adversely
affected the levels of transportation and water infrastructure
capital expenditures in our markets, reducing bidding
opportunities to replace backlog and increasing competition for
new projects. Assuming that these factors continue to affect
infrastructure capital expenditures in our markets in the near
term, and taking into account the amount of backlog we had at
September 30, 2009 and the lower anticipated margin bid on
some projects that we have recently been awarded and expect to
start work on in 2010, we anticipate that our revenues and net
income attributable to Sterling common stockholders for 2010,
before the results of operations of RLW, will be below, and
could be substantially below, the results we expect to achieve
for 2009. Decreases in, or failure to attain anticipated levels
of, revenues, operating results or backlog could adversely
affect the market price of our common stock.
We
currently do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock
and, consequently, you will achieve a positive return on your
investment in our common stock only if the market price of our
common stock appreciates above the price that you pay for
it.
We currently do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our
common stock for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, the
payment of dividends by us is restricted by our credit facility.
See Dividend Policy for more information.
Consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your
investment in our company will be if the market price of our
common stock appreciates and you are able to sell your shares at
a profit.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could lower our
stock price.
Our directors and executive officers will beneficially own
approximately 1,069,891 shares of our common stock after
completion of this offering. These stockholders will be free to
sell those shares, subject to the limitations of Rule 144
or Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Act (which are discussed under
Shares Eligible for Future Sale), and, subject
to certain exceptions, the
90-day
lock-up
agreements that these stockholders have entered into with the
underwriters. The holders of warrants to purchase
334,046 shares of our common stock at November 30,
2009 have registration rights that allow them to participate in
any future public offering of our shares (with certain
exceptions). Registration of these restricted shares of common
stock or shares purchasable under these warrants would permit
their sale into the public market immediately. We cannot predict
when these stockholders may sell their shares or in what
volumes. However, the market price of our common stock could
decline significantly if these stockholders sell a large number
of shares into the public market after this offering or if the
market believes that these sales may occur.
S-18
We may also issue our common stock from time to time as
consideration for future acquisitions and investments. In the
event that any such acquisition or investment is significant,
the number of shares of our common stock that we may issue could
in turn be significant. In addition, we may also grant
registration rights covering those shares in connection with any
such acquisition and investment.
Delaware
law and our charter documents may impede or discourage a
takeover or change of control.
Certain provisions of our restated and amended certificate of
incorporation, as amended, our bylaws and the provisions of
Delaware law, individually or collectively, may impede a merger,
takeover or other business combination involving us or
discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer for
our common stock, which could affect the market price of our
common stock.
S-19
CAUTIONARY
COMMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
include statements that are, or may be considered to be,
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements
are included throughout this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, including in the sections entitled
Business, Risk Factors, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and relate to matters
such as our industry, business strategy, goals and expectations
concerning our market position, future operations, margins,
profitability, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital
resources and other financial and operating information. We have
used the words anticipate, assume,
believe, budget, can,
continue, could, estimate,
expect, forecast, future,
intend, may, plan,
potential, predict, project,
should, will, would and
similar terms and phrases to identify forward-looking statements
in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
Forward-looking statements reflect our expectations as of the
date of this prospectus supplement regarding future events,
results or outcomes. These expectations may or may not be
realized. Some of these expectations may be based upon
assumptions or judgments that prove to be incorrect. In
addition, our business and operations involve numerous risks and
uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, that could
result in our expectations not being realized or otherwise could
materially affect our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from
our expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not
possible to identify all of these factors, they include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, including the current
recession, reductions in federal, state and local government
funding for infrastructure services and changes in those
governments budgets, practices, laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
delays or difficulties related to the completion of our
projects, including additional costs, reductions in revenues or
the payment of liquidated damages, or delays or difficulties
related to obtaining required governmental permits and approvals;
|
|
|
|
actions of suppliers, subcontractors, design engineers, joint
venture partners, customers, competitors, banks, surety
companies and others which are beyond our control, including
suppliers and subcontractors failure to perform;
|
|
|
|
the effects of estimates inherent in our
percentage-of-completion
accounting policies, including onsite conditions that differ
materially from those assumed in our original bid, contract
modifications, mechanical problems with our machinery or
equipment and effects of other risks discussed in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus;
|
|
|
|
cost escalations associated with our contracts, including
changes in availability, proximity and cost of materials such as
steel, cement, concrete, aggregates, oil, fuel and other
construction materials, and cost escalations associated with
subcontractors and labor;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on a few significant customers;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; although we prepare our budgets and
bid contracts based on historical rain and snowfall patterns,
the incidence of rain, snow, hurricanes, etc., may differ
materially from these expectations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the presence of competitors with greater financial resources or
lower margin requirements, and the impact of competitive bidders
on our ability to obtain new backlog at reasonable margins
acceptable to us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully identify, finance, complete and
integrate acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
citations issued by any governmental authority, including the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration;
|
|
|
|
the current instability of financial institutions, which could
cause losses on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors incorporated by reference as described under
Risk Factors.
|
S-20
In reading this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus and the documents incorporated herein and therein by
reference, you should consider these factors carefully in
evaluating any forward-looking statements, and you are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in, or suggested by, the forward-looking statements
that we make in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus are reasonable, we can provide no assurance that they
will be achieved.
The forward-looking statements included in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus and in the documents
incorporated by reference herein and therein are made only as of
the date hereof or thereof, and we undertake no obligation to
update any information contained in this prospectus supplement
or the accompanying prospectus or in the documents incorporated
herein or therein by reference or to publicly release the
results of any revisions to any forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances that occur, or that we become
aware of after the date of this prospectus supplement, except as
may be required by applicable securities laws.
S-21
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of 2,400,000
shares of our common stock in this offering, assuming an
offering price of $17.07 per share, will be approximately
$38.5 million ($44.4 million if the underwriters
option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full),
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated
offering expenses.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
to repay indebtedness outstanding, if any, under our
$75 million revolving credit facility; and
|
|
|
|
to strengthen our balance sheet, including our working capital
and tangible net worth, in order to fund our business, provide
liquidity for future growth and increase our bonding capacity.
|
At December 2, 2009, we had $5.0 million of revolving
borrowings outstanding under our credit agreement with Comerica
Bank, as a lender and as agent for the lenders from time to time
party thereto. Borrowings under our credit agreement currently
bear interest at an average rate of 3.25%. The credit agreement
was entered into on October 31, 2007 and allows us to
borrow up to $75 million subject to compliance with the
requirements of the credit agreement. The amount of borrowings
under our credit facility fluctuates from time to time. The
actual amount of net proceeds from the offering used to repay
our indebtedness under our credit facility will depend on the
amounts that are outstanding at the time of the receipt of
proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in this
offering.
Throughout this prospectus supplement, we have assumed an
offering price of $17.07 per share, which is equal to the last
reported sales price per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq
on December 2, 2009. Each $1.00 change in the actual per
share offering price from the price assumed in the prospectus
supplement would change by approximately $2.3 million the amount
of our net proceeds available to strengthen our balance sheet
after funding the repayment of indebtedness referenced above. A
10% change in the number of shares of common stock sold in this
offering would correspondingly change the net proceeds to us
from this offering by approximately $3.9 million, after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and offering
expenses.
S-22
MARKET
PRICE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol STRL. The quarterly market high and
low sales prices for our common stock for 2007, 2008 and 2009
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.74
|
|
|
$
|
17.42
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.86
|
|
|
$
|
18.90
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.97
|
|
|
$
|
18.64
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.60
|
|
|
$
|
20.45
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.84
|
|
|
$
|
16.37
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.02
|
|
|
$
|
18.70
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.80
|
|
|
$
|
16.16
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.30
|
|
|
$
|
9.40
|
|
Year Ending December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.99
|
|
|
$
|
13.80
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
12.52
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.48
|
|
|
$
|
14.06
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through December 2, 2009)
|
|
$
|
20.02
|
|
|
$
|
14.76
|
|
On December 2, 2009, the closing sale price of our common
stock as reported on NASDAQ was $17.07 per share. At
November 30, 2009, there were approximately 1,170 holders
of record of our common stock.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock. For
the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings in our
business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends.
Whether or not we declare any dividends will be at the
discretion of our board of directors considering then-existing
conditions, including the Companys financial condition and
results of operations, capital requirements, bonding prospects,
contractual restrictions (including those under our credit
facility), business prospects and other factors that our Board
of Directors considers relevant.
S-23
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and
capitalization as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis;
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis, assuming the RLW acquisition had been
effected on September 30, 2009; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis, assuming the RLW acquisition
had been effected on September 30, 2009 and reflecting the
application of the assumed net proceeds from this offering,
after deducting approximately $2.0 million for underwriting
discounts payable by us and estimated offering expenses of
approximately $400,000, as set forth under Use of
Proceeds.
|
For purposes of the pro forma as adjusted column of the
capitalization table below, we have assumed the net proceeds
from this offering will be $38.5 million after deducting
underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable
by us. A $1.00 increase or decrease in the offering price would
change each of the total stockholders equity and total
capitalization line items by approximately $2.3 million, after
taking into account corresponding changes in the underwriting
discounts payable by us. A 10% change in the number of shares of
common stock sold in this offering would correspondingly change
the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $3.9
million, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts
and offering expenses.
You should read this table in conjunction with Use of
Proceeds, Selected Historical Financial and
Operating Data, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Debt and put liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(2)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
40,501
|
|
|
|
40,501
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Put liabilities related to and noncontrolling owners
interests in subsidiaries subsidiaries
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
23,068
|
|
|
|
23,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and put liabilities
|
|
|
48,069
|
|
|
|
63,569
|
|
|
|
23,569
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 19,000,000 shares
authorized; 13,285,244 shares issued and outstanding,
actual; 13,285,244 shares issued and outstanding, pro
forma; 15,685,244 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma
as adjusted(3)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
150,902
|
|
|
|
150,902
|
|
|
|
189,415
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sterling common stockholders equity
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
221,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
231,137
|
|
|
$
|
246,637
|
|
|
$
|
245,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The mortgage in the original principal amount of
$1.1 million on land and facilities where our headquarters
is located had a floating rate of interest at September 30,
2009 of 3.5% per annum, repayable over 15 years commencing
in 2001. This mortgage is cross-collateralized with a prior
mortgage on the land and |
S-24
|
|
|
|
|
equipment repair facilities, which were purchased in 1998, in
the original amount of $500,000, repayable over 15 years
with an interest rate of 9.3% per annum. |
|
(2) |
|
The revolving credit facility in place on September 30,
2009 provided for revolving loans up to a maximum of
$75.0 million with a maturity date of October 31,
2012. The average interest rate on revolving debt outstanding
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately 3.25%. At December 2, 2009, we had $5.0
million of revolving borrowings outstanding under our credit
agreement. |
|
(3) |
|
At September 30, 2009, we had 13,285,244 shares of
common stock outstanding; 336,740 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding stock
options at a weighted average exercise price per share of
$11.188; and 334,046 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance upon the exercise of outstanding warrants at an
exercise price per share of $1.50. |
S-25
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following tables set forth our summary historical financial
and operating data for the periods indicated. The summary
condensed consolidated statement of operations and cash flow
data for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
and the summary condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. The summary condensed
consolidated statement of operations and cash flow data for 2004
and 2005, and the condensed consolidated balance sheet data as
of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, have been derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements, which are not
included in this prospectus supplement. The summary condensed
consolidated financial data as of and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this prospectus supplement. The unaudited consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as our
audited consolidated financial statements and include all
adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments,
that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our
financial position and operating results for the unaudited
periods. The summary historical financial and operating data as
of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be obtained
for a full year.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
132,478
|
|
|
$
|
219,439
|
|
|
$
|
249,348
|
|
|
$
|
306,220
|
|
|
$
|
415,074
|
|
|
$
|
305,802
|
|
|
$
|
319,170
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
119,217
|
|
|
|
195,683
|
|
|
|
220,801
|
|
|
|
272,534
|
|
|
|
373,102
|
|
|
|
273,389
|
|
|
|
272,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
13,261
|
|
|
|
23,756
|
|
|
|
28,547
|
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
|
|
41,972
|
|
|
|
32,413
|
|
|
|
46,932
|
|
General and administrative expenses, net
|
|
|
7,696
|
|
|
|
9,091
|
|
|
|
10,549
|
|
|
|
12,682
|
|
|
|
13,844
|
|
|
|
10,131
|
|
|
|
10,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
14,665
|
|
|
|
17,998
|
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
28,128
|
|
|
|
22,282
|
|
|
|
36,366
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
(1,206
|
)
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
13,329
|
|
|
|
19,204
|
|
|
|
22,396
|
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
|
|
22,669
|
|
|
|
36,618
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2,134
|
)
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
10,025
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
12,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,243
|
|
|
|
10,541
|
|
|
|
12,638
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,615
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in
earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
(962
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
5,653
|
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Basic income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in computing
per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
5,343
|
|
|
|
7,775
|
|
|
|
10,583
|
|
|
|
11,044
|
|
|
|
13,120
|
|
|
|
13,102
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
11,714
|
|
|
|
11,836
|
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
13,703
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
Balance sheet data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,267
|
|
|
$
|
28,466
|
|
|
$
|
80,649
|
|
|
$
|
55,305
|
|
|
$
|
62,094
|
|
|
$
|
62,239
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,169
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
|
|
17,383
|
|
|
|
41,231
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
16,052
|
|
|
|
18,354
|
|
|
|
62,874
|
|
|
|
82,063
|
|
|
|
95,123
|
|
|
|
93,561
|
|
|
|
115,778
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
89,544
|
|
|
|
118,455
|
|
|
|
167,772
|
|
|
|
274,515
|
|
|
|
289,615
|
|
|
|
296,713
|
|
|
|
308,871
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
25,445
|
|
|
|
23,142
|
|
|
|
30,782
|
|
|
|
65,654
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
60,575
|
|
|
|
40,501
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
54,336
|
|
|
|
69,842
|
|
|
|
76,781
|
|
|
|
135,903
|
|
|
|
130,499
|
|
|
|
142,952
|
|
|
|
125,803
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
35,208
|
|
|
|
48,612
|
|
|
|
90,991
|
|
|
|
138,612
|
|
|
|
159,116
|
|
|
|
153,761
|
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
Cash flow data from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
4,171
|
|
|
$
|
31,266
|
|
|
$
|
23,089
|
|
|
$
|
29,542
|
|
|
$
|
26,721
|
|
|
$
|
18,929
|
|
|
$
|
43,032
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,809
|
)
|
|
|
(10,972
|
)
|
|
|
(52,358
|
)
|
|
|
(47,935
|
)
|
|
|
(42,923
|
)
|
|
|
(32,946
|
)
|
|
|
(20,870
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
|
35,468
|
|
|
|
70,576
|
|
|
|
(9,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
|
|
(15,228
|
)
|
Other operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (unaudited)(1)
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
20,288
|
|
|
$
|
25,691
|
|
|
$
|
30,486
|
|
|
$
|
40,388
|
|
|
$
|
31,220
|
|
|
$
|
45,162
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
|
|
11,392
|
|
|
|
24,849
|
|
|
|
26,319
|
|
|
|
19,896
|
|
|
|
16,972
|
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
Backlog at end of period (unaudited)(2)
|
|
|
232,000
|
|
|
|
307,000
|
|
|
|
395,000
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
448,000
|
|
|
|
511,006
|
|
|
|
371,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA is defined as income attributable to Sterling common
stockholders before net interest income/expense, income tax
expense, and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is a non-GAAP
financial measure that we use for our internal budgeting
process, which excludes the effects of financing costs, income
taxes and non-cash depreciation and amortization. Although
EBITDA is a common alternative measure of performance used by
investors, financial analysts and rating agencies to assess
operating performance for companies in our industry, it is not a
substitute for other GAAP financial measures such as net income
or |
S-27
|
|
|
|
|
operating income as calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP. Furthermore, we believe that the non-GAAP EBITDA financial
measure is useful to investors in providing greater transparency
to the information used by management in its operational and
investment decision making. Our non-GAAP financial measures may
be different from such measures used by other companies. We urge
you to review the GAAP financial measures included in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and our
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto,
and the other financial information contained in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus and incorporated
herein and therein by reference, and not to rely on any single
financial measure to evaluate our business. |
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income attributable to Sterling common
stockholders to EBITDA for each of the fiscal periods indicated
is as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
5,565
|
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,545
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
9,757
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
Interest expense (income),net
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
(1,206
|
)
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2,134
|
)
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
10,025
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
12,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
9,520
|
|
|
$
|
20,288
|
|
|
$
|
25,691
|
|
|
$
|
30,486
|
|
|
$
|
40,388
|
|
|
$
|
31,220
|
|
|
$
|
45,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of non-GAAP financial measures is subject to inherent
limitations because they do not include all the expenses that
must be included under GAAP and because they involve the
exercise of judgment as to which charges should be excluded from
the non-GAAP financial measure. EBITDA has material limitations
as a performance measure because it excludes (1) interest
expense, which is a necessary element of our costs and ability
to generate revenues because we borrow money to finance our
operations, (2) depreciation, which is a necessary element
of our costs and ability to generate revenues because we use
capital assets, and (3) income taxes, which we are required
to pay. Management compensates for these limitations by
providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts
excluded from EBITDA and by presenting comparable GAAP measures
more prominently in our disclosures. |
|
(2) |
|
Historical information does not include RHB backlog prior to
December 31, 2007. Backlog is our estimate of the revenues
that we expect to earn in future periods on our construction
projects. We generally add the anticipated revenue value of each
new project to our backlog when management reasonably determines
that we will be awarded the contract and there are no known
impediments to being awarded the contract. We deduct from
backlog the revenues earned on each project during the
applicable fiscal period. As construction on our projects
progresses, we also increase or decrease backlog to take into
account our estimates of the effects of changes in estimated
quantities, changed conditions, change orders and other
variations from initially anticipated contract revenues,
including completion penalties and bonuses. At
September 30, 2009, our backlog included approximately
$76 million of expected revenues for which the contracts
had not yet been officially awarded or the contract price had
not been finalized. Historically, subsequent non-awards of
contracts or finalization of contract price have not materially
affected our backlog, results of operations or financial
condition. |
S-28
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information gives pro forma effect to our acquisition of an 80%
interest in RLW, accounted for as a business combination using
the purchase method of accounting. The preliminary allocation of
the purchase price used in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial information is based on managements
preliminary valuation. The estimates and assumptions are subject
to change upon the finalization of valuations, which are
contingent upon final appraisals of plant and equipment,
identifiable intangible assets, adjustments to contract-related
and other accounts through December 3, 2009 and the results
of operations and other changes through December 31, 2009.
Revisions to the preliminary purchase price allocation could
result in significant deviations from the accompanying pro forma
information.
The pro forma condensed combined statements of income reflect
the acquisition of RLW as if it occurred on January 1,
2008. The historical results of operations included in the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 were derived from
the audited financial statements of each entity, included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. The historical results
of operations included in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statement of income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were derived from the unaudited
financial statements of each entity, included elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement.
The pro forma condensed combined balance sheet reflects the
acquisition of RLW as if it occurred on September 30, 2009.
The historical balance sheets of Sterling Construction and RLW
included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet were derived from the unaudited financial statements of
each entity, included elsewhere in this prospectus supplement.
This unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information has been prepared by management for illustrative
purposes only. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information is not intended to represent or be
indicative of the financial position or results of operations in
future periods or the results that actually would have been
realized had Sterling Construction and RLW been a combined
company during the specified periods. The pro forma adjustments
reflect, among other things, pre-closing distributions by RLW to
its equity holders of certain assets and cash and securities
that were not required for operation of the business. In
addition, classifications of certain financial accounts of RLW
may differ from those of Sterling. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information reflects the
acquisition of the interest in RLW, which we financed with a
combination of cash and cash equivalents and proceeds from the
sale of short-term securities. The proceeds of this offering
have not been reflected in the pro forma results. The unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial information, including
the notes thereto, is qualified in its entirety by reference to,
and should be read in conjunction with, the historical financial
statements and notes thereto of Sterling and RLW included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and incorporated by
reference herein.
S-29
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Sterling
|
|
|
RLW
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
62,239
|
|
|
$
|
12,676
|
|
|
$
|
(69,887
|
)(a)(b)(d)(e)
|
|
$
|
5,028
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
41,231
|
|
|
|
18,027
|
|
|
|
(13,217
|
)(b)(c)(d)
|
|
|
46,041
|
|
Contracts receivable, including retainage
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
|
37,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,675
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
6,196
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,666
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
Deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
178,534
|
|
|
|
69,853
|
|
|
|
(83,104
|
)
|
|
|
165,283
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
71,681
|
|
|
|
11,864
|
|
|
|
(714
|
)(c)
|
|
|
82,831
|
|
Investment in RLW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
57,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,625
|
(f)
|
|
|
115,857
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
308,871
|
|
|
$
|
81,742
|
|
|
$
|
(25,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
365,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
27,475
|
|
|
$
|
20,810
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,285
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings of
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
25,693
|
|
|
|
17,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,604
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
2,096
|
|
|
|
(2,096
|
)(a)
|
|
|
73
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
62,756
|
|
|
|
42,445
|
|
|
|
(2,096
|
)
|
|
|
103,105
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
40,428
|
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
(4,780
|
)(a)
|
|
|
40,428
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
15,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,051
|
|
Put liabilities related to and noncontrolling owners
interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
(e)
|
|
|
23,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
63,047
|
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
11,420
|
|
|
|
79,247
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)(f)
|
|
|
132
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
150,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,902
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
34,512
|
|
|
|
(34,512
|
)(b)(c)(f)
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sterling Common Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
34,517
|
|
|
|
(34,517
|
)
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
308,871
|
|
|
$
|
81,742
|
|
|
$
|
(25,193
|
)
|
|
$
|
365,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Pro Forma Adjustments and Explanatory Notes on next page.
S-30
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
Pro Forma Adjustments and Explanatory Notes
At September 30, 2009
Amounts in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Adjustments
|
|
(a)
|
|
RLW debt reduction payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,096
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,876
|
)
|
(b)
|
|
Estimated withdrawals by RLW stockholders to reduce working
capital and stockholders equity to amounts required under
the Definitive Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,800
|
)
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(5,266
|
)
|
(c)
|
|
Distributions of assets to RLW stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
(d)
|
|
Liquidation of Sterling short-term investments to fund part
of the purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,489
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(7,489
|
)
|
(e)
|
|
Investment in RLW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in RLW
|
|
$
|
(80,900
|
)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
(64,700
|
)
|
|
|
Put liability related to and noncontrolling owners
interests in RLW
|
|
|
(16,200
|
)
|
(f)
|
|
Entries in consolidation to reflect goodwill,
step-up in
basis of property and equipment and noncontrolling interests in
RLW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
58,625
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
22,270
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Investment in RLW
|
|
|
(80,900
|
)
|
Explanatory Notes
|
|
(1)
|
|
Summary of Purchase Price -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and cash from sale of short-term
investments
|
|
$
|
64,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price*
|
|
$
|
64,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Preliminary Allocation of Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
11,150
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
58,625
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(16,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preliminary purchase price
allocation*
|
|
$
|
64,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the purchase
price is subject to adjustments when RLWs working capital
and tangible stockholders equity as of November 30,
2009, and the results of operations for the month of December
2009, are agreed upon by RLWs selling stockholders and
Sterling. The purchase price shown in the Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Balance Sheet includes managements estimate of
such adjustments. |
S-31
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In 2013, the noncontrolling interest of 20% of RLW retained by
the RLW noncontrolling interest holders may be put to Sterling,
and Sterling has the right to call such interests. The price to
be paid to the Sellers will be 20% of RLWs simple average
EBITDA for calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012 multiplied by a
multiple, as defined in the Purchase Agreement, not to be
greater than 4.5 or less than 4.0. Such contingent consideration
has been recorded in Pro Forma Entry (e) above at its
estimated fair value at closing in accordance with GAAP. |
|
(3) |
|
The effect of the above pre-acquisition Pro Forma Adjustments of
RLW on its historical working capital and stockholders
equity is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Equity
|
|
Historical Balances of RLW as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
27,408
|
|
|
$
|
34,517
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
RLW debt reduction payments
|
|
|
(4,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
Estimated withdrawals by RLW stockholders to reduce working
capital and stockholders equity to amounts required under
the definitive purchase agreement
|
|
|
(11,066
|
)
|
|
|
(11,066
|
)
|
|
(c
|
)
|
|
Distributions of assets to RLW stockholders
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Balances of RLW as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
$
|
22,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-32
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Sterling
|
|
|
RLW
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Sterling
|
|
|
RLW
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
415,074
|
|
|
$
|
126,122
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
541,196
|
|
|
$
|
319,170
|
|
|
$
|
112,257
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
431,427
|
|
Costs of earned contract revenues
|
|
|
373,102
|
|
|
|
100,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473,588
|
|
|
|
272,238
|
|
|
|
83,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41,972
|
|
|
|
25,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,608
|
|
|
|
46,932
|
|
|
|
28,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,511
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(13,763
|
)
|
|
|
(5,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,804
|
)
|
|
|
(10,536
|
)
|
|
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,617
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,128
|
|
|
|
20,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
|
|
36,366
|
|
|
|
24,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,885
|
|
Interest and dividend income and gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
(a)(b)
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
(a)(b)
|
|
|
160
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
|
|
21,575
|
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
49,483
|
|
|
|
36,618
|
|
|
|
24,869
|
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
60,731
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,231
|
)
|
|
(b)(d)
|
|
|
(16,256
|
)
|
|
|
(12,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,361
|
)
|
|
(b)(d)
|
|
|
(19,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
21,575
|
|
|
|
(7,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
33,227
|
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
|
|
24,869
|
|
|
|
(8,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in
earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,265
|
)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(5,173
|
)
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,900
|
)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(6,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
21,575
|
|
|
$
|
(11,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,054
|
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
24,869
|
|
|
$
|
(13,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in
computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
13,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,120
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
See Pro Forma Adjustments and Explanatory Notes on next page.
S-33
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of Income
Pro Forma
Adjustments and Explanatory Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
(a)
|
|
Reduction in interest/investment income for investments used
in pro forma withdrawals of RLW stockholders--See Pro Forma
Notes (a), (b) and (c) to Pro Forma Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
(b)
|
|
Reduction in interest/investment income for investments used
by Sterling in purchase of RLW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
841
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
(c)
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in income of RLW, net of its portion
of (a) above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest income statement
|
|
$
|
4,265
|
|
|
$
|
4,900
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest balance sheet
|
|
|
(4,265
|
)
|
|
|
(4,900
|
)
|
(d)
|
|
Tax effect of Sterlings 80% of RLWs Net Income at
federal and Utah net statutory rate of 38.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
6,525
|
|
|
$
|
7,497
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(6,525
|
)
|
|
|
(7,497
|
)
|
S-34
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion together with the
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus supplement. Except where explicitly
stated, this discussion does not include RLWs historical
results of operations. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are based on managements current
expectations, estimates and projections about our business and
operations. The cautionary statements made in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus should be read as
applying to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear
in this prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus. Our
actual results may differ materially from those currently
anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as
a result of a number of factors, including those we discuss
under Risk Factors, Cautionary Common
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and elsewhere in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and in the
documents incorporated herein and therein by reference.
Overview
We are a leading heavy civil construction company that operates
in one segment, heavy civil construction, through its
subsidiaries, which specialize in the building, reconstruction
and repair of transportation and water infrastructure primarily
in large and growing markets in Texas and Nevada. Transportation
infrastructure projects include highways, roads, bridges and
light rail. Water infrastructure projects include water,
wastewater and storm drainage systems. Sterling provides general
contracting services primarily to public sector clients,
including excavating, concrete and asphalt paving, installation
of large-diameter water and wastewater distribution systems;
construction of bridges and similar large structures;
construction of light rail infrastructure; concrete batch plant
operations, concrete crushing and aggregates. We perform the
majority of the work required by our contracts with our own
crews and equipment.
Our business was founded in 1955 and has a history of profitable
growth, which we have achieved by expanding both our service
profile and our market areas. This involves adding services,
such as concrete operations, in order to capture a greater
percentage of available work in current and potential markets.
It also involves strategically expanding operations, either by
establishing an office in a new market, often after having
successfully bid on and completed a project in that market, or
by acquiring a company that gives us an immediate entry into a
market. On December 3, 2009, we acquired an 80% interest in
Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC, which primarily
has performed construction projects in Utah.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, included in this prospectus supplement,
and conform to the FASBs Accounting Standards Codification
(or GAAP).
We operate in one segment and have only one reportable segment
and one reporting unit component, heavy civil construction. Even
if our local offices were to be considered separate components
of our heavy civil construction operating segment, those
components could be aggregated into a single reporting unit for
purposes of testing goodwill for impairment under Accounting
Standards Codification
50-11 and
EITF D-101 because our local offices all have similar economic
characteristics and are similar in all of the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
The nature of the products and services each of our
local offices perform similar construction projects
they build, reconstruct and repair roads, highways, bridges,
light and commuter rail and water, waste water and storm
drainage systems.
|
|
|
|
The nature of the production processes our heavy
civil construction services rendered in the construction
production process by each of on our construction projects
performed by each local office is the same they
excavate dirt, remove existing pavement and pipe, lay aggregate
or concrete pavement, pipe and rail and build bridges and
similar large structures in order to complete our projects.
|
|
|
|
The type or class of customer for products and
services substantially all of our customers are
federal and state departments of transportation, cities,
counties, and regional water, rail and toll-road
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
authorities. A substantial portion of the funding for the state
departments of transportation to finance the projects we
construct is furnished by the federal government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The methods used to distribute products or provide
services the heavy civil construction services
rendered on our projects are performed primarily with our own
field work crews (laborers, equipment operators and supervisors)
and equipment (backhoes, loaders, dozers, graders, cranes, pug
mills, crushers, and concrete and asphalt plants).
|
|
|
|
The nature of the regulatory environment we perform
substantially all of our projects for federal, state and
municipal governmental agencies, and all of the projects that we
perform are subject to substantially similar regulation under
U.S. and state department of transportation rules,
including prevailing wage and hour laws; codes established by
the federal government and municipalities regarding water and
waste water systems installation; and laws and regulations
relating to workplace safety and worker health of the
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and to
the employment of immigrants of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
|
The economic characteristics of our local offices are similar.
While profit margin objectives included in contract bids have
some variability from contract to contract, our profit margin
objectives are not differentiated by our chief operating
decision maker or our office management based on local office
location. Instead, the projects undertaken by each local office
are primarily competitively-bid,
fixed-unit
price contracts, all of which are bid based on achieving gross
profit levels based on margin objectives that reflect the
relevant skills required, the contract size and duration, the
availability of our personnel and equipment, the makeup and
level of our existing backlog, our competitive advantages and
disadvantages, prior experience, the contracting agency or
customer, the source of contract funding, anticipated start and
completion dates, construction risks, penalties or incentives
and general economic conditions.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Our business involves
making significant estimates and assumptions in the normal
course of business relating to our contracts due to, among other
things, different project scopes and specifications, the
long-term duration of our contract cycle and the type of
contract utilized. Therefore, management believes that
Revenue Recognition is the most important and
critical accounting policy. The most significant estimates with
regard to these financial statements relate to the estimating of
total forecasted construction contract revenues, costs and
profits for each project in accordance with accounting for
long-term contracts. Actual results could differ from these
estimates and such differences could be material.
Our estimates of contract revenue and cost are highly detailed.
We believe, based on our experience, that our current systems of
management and accounting controls allow management to produce
reliable estimates of total contract revenue and cost for each
project during any accounting period. However, many factors can
and do change during a contract performance period, which can
result in a change to contract profitability from one financial
reporting period to another. Some of the factors that can
adversely change the estimate of total contract revenue, cost
and profit include differing site conditions (to the extent that
contract remedies are unavailable), the failure of major
material suppliers to deliver on time, the failure of
subcontractors to perform as agreed, unusual weather conditions,
our failure to achieve expected productivity and efficient use
of labor and equipment and the inaccuracies of our original bid
estimate. Because we have a large number of projects in process
at any given time, these changes in estimates can sometimes
offset each other without affecting overall profitability.
However, significant changes in cost estimates, particularly on
larger, more complex projects, can have a material impact on our
financial statements and are reflected in our results of
operations when they become known.
When recording revenue from change orders on contracts that have
been approved as to scope but not price, we include in revenue
an amount equal to the amount that we currently expect to
recover from customers in relation to costs incurred by us for
changes in contract specifications or designs, or other
unanticipated additional costs. Revenue relating to change order
claims is recognized only if it is probable that
S-36
the revenue will be realized. When determining the likelihood of
eventual recovery, we consider such factors as evaluation of
entitlement, settlements reached to date and our experience with
the customer. When new facts become known, an adjustment to the
estimated recovery is made and reflected in the current period
results.
Revenue
Recognition
The majority of our contracts with our customers are fixed
unit price. Under such contracts, we are committed to
providing materials or services required by a contract at fixed
unit prices (for example, dollars per cubic yard of concrete
poured or per cubic yard of earth excavated). To minimize
increases in the material prices and subcontracting costs used
in submitting bids, we obtain firm quotations from our suppliers
and subcontractors. After we are advised that our bid is the
winning bid, we enter into firm contracts with most of our
materials suppliers and
sub-contractors,
thereby mitigating the risk of future price variations affecting
those contract costs. Such quotations do not include any
quantity guarantees, and we therefore have no obligation for
materials or subcontract services beyond those required to
complete the respective contracts that we are awarded for which
quotations have been provided. As a result, we have rarely been
exposed to material price or availability risk on contracts in
our contract backlog. Assuming performance by our suppliers and
subcontractors, the principal remaining risks under our fixed
price contracts relate to labor and equipment costs and
productivity levels. Most of our state and municipal contracts
provide for termination of the contract for the convenience of
the owner, with provisions to pay us only for work performed
through the date of termination.
We use the percentage of completion accounting method for
construction contracts. Revenue is recognized as costs are
incurred in an amount equal to cost plus the related expected
profit based on the percentage of completion method of
accounting in the ratio of costs incurred to estimated final
costs. Contract cost consists of direct costs on contracts,
including labor and materials, amounts payable to subcontractors
and equipment expense (primarily depreciation, fuel, maintenance
and repairs). Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method for construction equipment. Contract cost is recorded as
incurred, and revisions in contract revenue and cost estimates
are reflected in the accounting period when known.
The accuracy of our revenue and profit recognition in a given
period is dependent on the accuracy of our estimates of the cost
to finish uncompleted contracts. Our cost estimates for all of
our significant contracts use a highly detailed bottom
up approach, and we believe our experience allows us to
produce reliable estimates. However, our projects can be highly
complex, and in almost every case, the profit margin estimates
for a contract will either increase or decrease to some extent
from the amount that was originally estimated at the time of
bid. Because we have a large number of projects of varying
levels of size and complexity in process at any given time,
these changes in estimates can sometimes offset each other
without materially impacting our overall profitability. However,
large changes in revenue or cost estimates can have a
significant effect on profitability.
There are a number of factors that can contribute to changes in
estimates of contract cost and profitability. The most
significant of these include the completeness and accuracy of
the original bid, recognition of costs associated with scope
changes, extended overhead due to customer-related and
weather-related delays, subcontractor and supplier performance
issues, site conditions that differ from those assumed in the
original bid (to the extent contract remedies are unavailable),
the availability and skill level of workers in the geographic
location of the project and changes in the availability and
proximity of materials. The foregoing factors, as well as the
stage of completion of contracts in process and the mix of
contracts at different margins, may cause fluctuations in gross
profit between periods, and these fluctuations may be
significant.
Valuation
of Long-Term Assets
Long-lived assets, which include property, equipment and
acquired identifiable intangible assets, including goodwill, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Impairment evaluations involve fair values
and management estimates of useful asset lives and future cash
flows. Actual useful lives and cash flows could be different
from those estimated by management, and this could have a
material effect on operating results and financial position. In
addition, we had goodwill with a carrying amount of
approximately $57 million at December 31,
S-37
2008 and, on a pro forma basis with the acquisition of RLW,
approximately $116 million at September 30, 2009,
which must be reviewed for impairment at least annually. We
completed our annual impairment review for historical goodwill
during the fourth quarter of 2008, and it did not result in an
impairment.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We regularly review our
deferred tax assets for recoverability and, where necessary,
establish a valuation allowance. We are subject to the
alternative minimum tax, or AMT, and payments of AMT result in a
reduction of our deferred tax liability.
Our deferred tax assets related to prior year NOLs for financial
statement purposes were fully utilized during 2007. In addition
to the utilization of those NOLs, we had available to us the
excess tax benefit resulting from exercise of a significant
number of non-qualified
in-the-money
options, which we utilized in the preparation of our 2008
federal income tax return. Accordingly, because we will no
longer have offsets provided by the NOLs, a comparison of our
future cash flows to our historic cash flows may not be
meaningful.
Results
of Operations
Backlog
at September 30, 2009
At September 30, 2009, our backlog of construction projects
was $371 million, as compared to $344 million at
June 30, 2009 and $511 million at September 30,
2008. We were awarded or were the apparent low bidder on
$242 million of new contracts in the first nine months of
2009, including $131 million in the third quarter of 2009,
compared to $366 million of new contracts in the first nine
months of 2008. Our contracts are typically completed in 12 to
36 months. At September 30, 2009, there was
approximately $76 million of backlog where we were the
apparent low bidder, but had not yet been formally awarded the
contract or the contract price had not been finalized.
Historically, subsequent non-awards of low bids have not
materially affected our backlog or financial condition.
During the last quarter of 2008 and the first nine months of
2009, the bidding environment in our markets has been much more
competitive because of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
While our business includes only minimal residential and
commercial infrastructure work, the severe fall-off in new
projects in those markets has resulted in some residential and
commercial infrastructure contractors bidding on smaller public
sector transportation and water infrastructure projects,
sometimes at bid levels below our break-even pricing, thus
increasing competition and creating downward pressure on bid
prices in our markets.
|
|
|
|
Traditional competitors on larger transportation and water
infrastructure projects also appear to have been bidding at less
than normal margins in order to replenish their reduced backlogs.
|
These factors have limited our ability to maintain or increase
our backlog through successful bids for new projects and have
compressed the profitability on the new projects where we
submitted successful bids. While we have recently been more
aggressive in reducing the anticipated margins we use to bid on
some projects, we have not bid at anticipated loss margins in
order to obtain new backlog.
Recent reductions in miles driven in the U.S. and more fuel
efficient vehicles have reduced federal and state gasoline taxes
and tolls collected. In addition, the federal government has not
renewed the SAFETEA-LU bill, which provided states with
substantial funding for transportation infrastructure projects.
Because the SAFETEA-LU bill expired on September 30, 2009,
the federal government rescinded a portion of the funding
previously committed to be provided to the states in 2009, with
interim financial assistance being extended on a
month-to-month
basis, most recently through December 18, 2009, at
approximately 70% of the prior year SAFETEA-LU levels.
Reductions in federal funding will negatively impact the
states highway and bridge construction expenditures for
2010. We are unable to predict when or on what terms the federal
government might renew the SAFETEA-LU bill or enact other
similar legislation.
S-38
Further, the nationwide decline in home sales, the increase in
foreclosures and a prolonged recession have resulted in
decreases in property taxes and some other local taxes, which
are among the sources of funding for municipal road, bridge and
water infrastructure construction.
These and other factors have adversely affected the levels of
transportation and water infrastructure capital expenditures in
our markets, reducing bidding opportunities to replace backlog
and increasing competition for new projects. Assuming that these
factors continue to affect infrastructure capital expenditures
in our markets in the near term, and taking into account the
amount of backlog we had at September 30, 2009 and the
lower anticipated margin bid on some projects the Company has
recently been awarded and expects to start work on in 2010, we
anticipate that the Companys revenues and net income
attributable to Sterling common stockholders for 2010, before
the results of operations of RLW, will be below, and could be
substantially below, the results we expect to achieve for 2009.
We do, however, expect that our markets will ultimately recover
from the conditions described above and that our backlog,
revenues and income will return to levels more consistent with
historical levels. However, we cannot predict the timing of such
a return to historical normalcy in our markets. We believe that
the Company is in a sound financial condition and has the
resources and management experience to weather current market
conditions and to continue to compete successfully for projects
as they become available at acceptable profit margin levels. See
Business Markets and Customers Our
Markets for a more detailed discussion of our markets and
their funding sources.
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared with
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) (Unaudited):
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
103,929
|
|
|
$
|
114,148
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
319,170
|
|
|
$
|
305,802
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
16,542
|
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
|
46,932
|
|
|
|
32,413
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
44.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
General, administrative and other expenses
|
|
|
(3,578
|
)
|
|
|
(3,140
|
)
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
(10,566
|
)
|
|
|
(10,131
|
)
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
9,432
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
|
|
36,366
|
|
|
|
22,282
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
50.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
56.2
|
%
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(51.6
|
)%
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(34.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and earnings attributable to the
noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
13,041
|
|
|
|
9,591
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
|
|
36,618
|
|
|
|
22,669
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(4,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,245
|
)
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
(12,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,616
|
)
|
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in
earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
99.7
|
%
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
85.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
8,092
|
|
|
$
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Revenues increased
$13.4 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 but decreased $10.2 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 over the comparable periods in 2008. The
increase in revenue was primarily due to a higher level of crew
and equipment resources utilized in the first two quarters of
2009 than in 2008 and better weather in the first nine months of
2009 than 2008. The better weather allowed our crews and
equipment to work more productively during 2009 and make more
progress towards completion of our contracts than in the
comparable 2008 period.
During the third quarter of 2009, we began to reduce the number
of our crews as a result of completing certain projects without
a comparable increase in backlog. At September 30, 2009,
our employees totaled
S-39
1,050 versus 1,172 at June 30, 2009. The lower crew level
and equipment utilization in the third quarter of 2009 resulted
in lower revenues in that quarter.
While revenues increased during the first nine months of 2009,
we anticipate that our full year revenues for 2009 will be lower
than our revenues for 2008. The results of our bidding efforts
in the fourth quarter of 2009 will affect our revenues and net
income for 2010.
Gross profit. During 2008 and 2009, we have
had as many as 60
contracts-in-progress
at any one time, of various sizes, of different expected
profitability and in various stages of completion. The nearer a
contract progresses toward completion, the more visibility we
have in refining our estimate of total revenues (including
incentives, delay penalties and change orders), costs and gross
profit. Thus gross profit as a percent of revenues can increase
or decrease from comparable and sequential quarters due to
variations among contracts and depending upon which contracts
are just commencing or are at a more advanced stage of
completion. At September 30, 2009, our contracts were on
average at a more advanced stage of completion than were those
in progress at the comparable 2008 period end.
The increases in gross profit of $4.0 million and
$14.5 million for the third quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 over the comparable periods in 2008 were
due to better execution on
contracts-in-progress,
and, as discussed above, differences in the mix in the stage of
completion and profitability of contracts at September 30,
2009 compared to September 30, 2008. The gross margins of
15.9% and 14.7% in the 2009 periods are not expected to be
indicative of the gross margins that the Company will achieve in
subsequent periods in 2009 and 2010.
General and administrative expenses, net of other
income. General and administrative expenses, net
of other income, increased by $438,000 in the third quarter of
2009 from 2008 and increased $435,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 over the comparable period in 2008. The
primary reasons for the higher G&A during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 versus the comparable
periods in 2008 were increases in compensation, related payroll
expense and professional fees, partially offset by lower
G&A-type depreciation and business promotion expenses. As a
percent of revenues, G&A, net of other income, was 3.4% and
3.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, versus 2.8%, and 3.3% of revenues for the
comparable three and nine month periods in 2008. General and
administrative expenses and other income do not vary directly
with the volume of work performed on contracts.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rates
for the third quarter of 2009 and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were 32.3% and 33.2%, respectively, as
compared to 33.8% for the third quarter of 2008 and 33.6% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and varied from
the statutory rate as a result of various permanent differences,
including the portion of earnings of a subsidiary taxed to the
noncontrolling interest owner and production tax credit offset
by the Texas franchise tax.
S-40
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2008 (2008) Compared with
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 (2007).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
415,074
|
|
|
$
|
306,220
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41,972
|
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
General and administrative expenses, net
|
|
|
(13,763
|
)
|
|
|
(13,231
|
)
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
(114.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,128
|
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and earnings attributable to noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
|
|
22,396
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
(7,890
|
)
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in earnings
of subsidiary
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(1,364.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog, end of year
|
|
$
|
448,000
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Revenues. Revenues increased
$109 million, or 35.5%, from 2007 to 2008. A majority of
the increase was due to the revenues earned by our Nevada
operations, acquired on October 31, 2007, which were
included in the consolidated results of operations for the full
year of 2008 versus only two months in 2007. The remainder of
the increase in revenues was the result of an increase in work
performed by our Texas operations as a result of better weather
throughout 2008 than 2007. Management estimates that revenues
would have been $10 to $12 million greater had our Houston
operations not been interrupted by Hurricane Ike and its after
effects in September 2008. In addition, one of our oil suppliers
in Nevada filed for bankruptcy in July 2008 and failed to
furnish contracted oil for our production of asphalt on two of
our
jobs-in-progress,
which delayed job performance and deferred approximately
$25.0 million of revenue into 2009. Sterling has negotiated
with NDOT and the profitability on these contracts was not
materially impacted by this matter.
Contract receivables are directly related to revenues and
include both amounts currently due and retainage. The increase
of $6.2 million in contracts receivable to
$60.6 million at December 31, 2008 versus 2007 is due
to the increase in revenue for the year 2008. The days revenue
in contract receivables is approximately 53 days and
65 days at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The days revenue in contract receivables would have been similar
for the two years if the revenues of our Nevada operations had
been included in our revenues for a full year in 2007.
Revenue in the fourth quarter of 2008 increased $21 million
to $109 million versus 2007 for the same reasons as
discussed above for the full year. See note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, included in this prospectus supplement,
for unaudited quarterly financial information.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased
$8.3 million in 2008 over 2007. This was due to the
contribution of our Nevada operations in 2008 and better weather
in Texas during most of 2008 than during 2007 (other than for
the period during Hurricane Ike), which allowed our crews and
equipment to be more productive. While Hurricane Ike affected
our work in 2008, a hurricane usually does not adversely affect
our profitability as much as the consistent rainy periods we had
in 2007. Our gross margin decreased in 2008 from 2007 because of
operating inefficiencies on certain contracts in Texas, higher
fuel costs and lower profit margins on certain
S-41
contracts started in the last half of 2008. We expect the trend
of lower profit margins on contract awards to continue at least
in the first half of 2009.
Gross profit in the fourth quarter of 2008 decreased
$2.5 million, or 21%, from the same quarter in 2007. Gross
profit was 13.7% of revenues in the 2007 fourth quarter versus
8.7% in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of some unusually
profitable municipal projects being performed primarily in the
2007 fourth quarter. Without those projects, the gross margins
for the 2007 fourth quarter would have been more in line with
normal margins, although still somewhat better than that of the
fourth quarter of 2008.
Contract Backlog. At December 31, 2008,
our backlog of construction projects was $448 million, as
compared to $450 million at December 31, 2007. We were
awarded approximately $413 million of new projects and
change orders and recognized $415 million of earned revenue
in 2008. Approximately $69 million of the backlog at
December 31, 2008 is expected to be completed after 2009.
The decrease in backlog from 2007 was due to increased
competition and economic conditions in certain of our markets.
General and administrative expenses, and other
income. General and administrative expenses, net,
increased by $0.5 million in 2008 from 2007 primarily due
to a full year of G&A at our Nevada operations offset by
lower stock compensation expense.
Despite the increase in absolute G&A expenses, the
percentage of G&A to revenue decreased to 3.3% in 2008 from
4.3% in 2007 as the Nevada operations G&A is not as
large a percentage of revenues as Sterlings G&A which
includes corporate overhead and expenses associated with being a
public company.
Other income decreased $0.6 million and consisted of gains
and losses on disposal of equipment which depends on, among
other things, age and condition of equipment disposed of,
insurance recoveries and the market for used equipment.
Operating income. Operating income increased
$7.1 million due to the factors discussed above regarding
gross profit and general and administrative expenses and other
income.
Interest income and expense. Net interest
income was $0.5 million less for 2008 than 2007 due to a
decrease in interest rates on cash and short-term investments
combined with the imputed interest expense of $0.2 million
on the put option related to the minority interest in RHB.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 34.6% compared to
35.2% for 2007. The difference between the effective tax rate
and the statutory tax rate was due to the portion of earnings of
a subsidiary taxed to the noncontrolling interest owner
partially offset by the revised Texas franchise tax which became
effective July 1, 2007.
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of
subsidiary. The increase of the noncontrolling
interest in earnings of subsidiary of $0.8 million was due
to the noncontrolling interests share of the results of
RHB included in the consolidated results of operations for a
full year in 2008 versus two months in 2007.
S-42
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2007 (2007) compared with
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 (2006).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
306,220
|
|
|
$
|
249,348
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
|
|
28,547
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(13,231
|
)
|
|
|
(10,825
|
)
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
98.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
17,998
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
22,396
|
|
|
|
19,204
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
12,638
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in earnings
of subsidiary
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract backlog, end of year
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
395,000
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
Revenues. Revenues increased $57 million,
or 23%, from 2006 to 2007 reflecting the effect of continued
expansion of our construction fleet, addition of a concrete
plant and addition of crews. Our workforce grew by 18%
year-over-year,
and we purchased over $36 million in property, plant and
equipment, including that acquired in the purchase of RHB,
within the twelve month period ending December 31, 2007.
The increased revenue came strictly from the state market
resulting from Sterling being the successful low bidder in the
state market which was assisted by an improved bidding climate
in 2006 due to a large state highway program and increased total
funding in the Dallas and Houston areas. The improvement in the
weather in the fourth quarter of 2007 offset much of the lower
than expected revenue of the first three quarters of 2007 due to
heavy rainfall during those months. Due to seasonality of the
Nevada market, the contracts of RHB had only a modest effect on
revenues for the two months they were included in 2007 revenues.
Contract receivables are directly related to revenues and
include both amounts currently due and retainage. The increase
of $11.6 million in contracts receivable to
$54.4 million at December 31, 2007 versus 2006 is due
to the increase in revenue for the year 2007. The days revenue
in contract receivables was approximately 65 days and
62 days at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The increase in days revenue in contract receivables was
primarily the result of the Nevada operations receivables at
December 31, 2007.
Gross Profit. The improvement in gross profits
in 2007 was due principally to the increase in revenues. The
slight margin reduction was attributable to a decrease of margin
in backlog due to poor weather for the first three quarters of
the year, and an increase in sales from the state contracts
which have historically had lower gross margins than municipal
contracts.
State highway contracts generally allow us to achieve greater
revenue and gross profit production from our equipment and work
crews, although on average the gross margins on this work tend
to be slightly lower than on our water infrastructure contracts
in the municipal markets. The lower margins reflect
proportionally larger material inputs in the state contracts as
we typically receive lower margins on materials than on labor.
Partially offsetting the margin reduction was our ability to
continue to redesign some jobs, achieve incentive
S-43
awards and maintain good execution levels during dry weather.
Due to the large number of contracts in different stages of
completion and in different locations, it is not practical to
quantify the impact of each of these matters on revenues and
gross profit.
Contract Backlog. The increase in contract
backlog was related to the Nevada acquisition in 2007. There was
$16 million included in our 2007 year-end backlog on
which we were the apparent low bidder and were subsequently
officially awarded these contracts. Historically, subsequent
non-awards of contracts on such low bids have not materially
affected our backlog or financial condition.
General and Administrative Expenses, Net of Other Income and
Expense. The increase in G&A in 2007 was
principally due to higher employee expenses, including an
increase in staff, and higher professional fees. Despite these
increases in G&A expenses in support of our growing
business, our ratio of G&A expenses to revenue remained
essentially unchanged from 2006 to 2007, at 4%.
Operating Income. The 2007 increase in
operating income resulted principally from the higher revenues
and gross profits as discussed above.
Interest Income and Expense. The interest
income net of interest expense remained virtually unchanged from
2006 to 2007 given the high cash and short term investments
maintained throughout the year and the offering completed in
December 2007. A total of $53,000 of interest expense was
capitalized as part of our office and shop expansion.
Income Taxes. Income taxes increased due to
increased income, the Texas margin tax and an increase in the
statutory tax rate.
Minority Interest. On October 31, 2007,
the Company acquired a 91.67% interest in RHB. The minority
interests share of RHBs income before income taxes
was $62,000 for the two months ended December 31, 2007 that
was included in the consolidated results of operations.
Net Income from Continuing Operations. The
2007 increase in net income from continuing operations was the
result of the various factors discussed above.
Discontinued Operations, Net of
Tax. Discontinued operations for 2006 represented
the results of operations of our distribution business, which
was operated by Steel City Products, LLC.
The distribution business was sold on October 27, 2006.
Sterling recorded proceeds from the sale of approximately
$5.4 million and recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of
approximately $249,000 and recorded $128,000 in income tax
expense related to that gain in 2006.
S-44
Historical
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth information about our cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (at end of period)
|
|
$
|
62,239
|
|
|
$
|
62,094
|
|
|
$
|
55,305
|
|
|
$
|
80,649
|
|
|
$
|
28,466
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
43,032
|
|
|
|
18,929
|
|
|
|
26,721
|
|
|
|
29,542
|
|
|
|
23,089
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(20,870
|
)
|
|
|
(32,946
|
)
|
|
|
(42,923
|
)
|
|
|
(47,935
|
)
|
|
|
(52,358
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(15,228
|
)
|
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
|
|
(9,142
|
)
|
|
|
70,576
|
|
|
|
35,468
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,934
|
|
|
$
|
(18,555
|
)
|
|
|
(25,344
|
)
|
|
|
52,183
|
|
|
|
6,199
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,357
|
)
|
Supplementary information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
16,972
|
|
|
|
19,896
|
|
|
|
26,319
|
|
|
|
24,849
|
|
Working capital (at end of period)
|
|
|
115,778
|
|
|
|
93,561
|
|
|
|
95,123
|
|
|
|
82,063
|
|
|
|
62,874
|
|
Operating
Activities
Significant non-cash items included in operating activities
during the first nine months of 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization, which for the first nine months
of 2009 totaled $10.3 million, an increase of
$0.6 million from last year, as a result of the increase in
the size of our construction fleet in 2008; and
|
|
|
|
deferred tax expense of $5.0 million in 2009 versus
$6.3 million in 2008, mainly attributable to accelerated
depreciation methods used on equipment and amortization of
goodwill for tax purposes.
|
Besides net income of $22.9 million for the first nine
months of 2009 and the non-cash items discussed above,
significant components of cash flow were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
contracts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess
of billings increased by $4.5 million in the first nine
months of 2009 due in part to the increase in revenues of
$13.4 million, and in part due to the timing of billings on
certain contracts, as compared to an increase of
$17.1 million in those accounts in 2008;
|
|
|
|
billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts increased $2.6 million as of
September 30, 2009, versus a decrease of $0.2 million
as of September 30, 2008, reflecting reductions in
mobilization billings as more contracts had progressed towards
completion;
|
|
|
|
accounts payable increased by $1.4 million in the first
nine months of 2009 as compared to an increase of
$3.3 million in the comparable period of 2008 as a result
of the timing of payments to vendors; and
|
|
|
|
changes in other current assets and liabilities resulted in an
increase in operating cash flows of $3.0 million for the
first nine months of 2009 primarily due to a decrease in prepaid
taxes and higher accruals for compensation and job related
expenses partially offset by a reduction in the workers
compensation accrual.
|
S-45
Investing
activities
Expenditures for equipment and office and shop facilities
totaled $4.4 million in the first nine months of 2009,
compared with a total of $17.0 million of property and
equipment purchases in the same period last year. Capital
equipment is acquired as needed to support backlog and to
replace retiring equipment. We plan to continue the replacement
of equipment over the remainder of the year as required. The
decrease in capital expenditures in the first nine months of
2009 was principally due to managements cautious view
regarding certain of the Companys markets and current
economic uncertainties. Unless such facts change, management
expects capital expenditures in 2009 to be less than in 2008.
Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, the Company had net purchases of short-term securities of
$16.5 million and $17.3 million, respectively.
Financing
activities
Financing activities in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008
primarily reflect a net reduction of $15.0 million and
$5.0 million, respectively, in borrowings under our
$75.0 million Credit Facility. The amount of borrowings
under the Credit Facility is based on the Companys
expectations of working capital requirements.
Liquidity
The level of working capital for our construction business
varies due to fluctuations in:
|
|
|
|
|
customer receivables and contract retentions;
|
|
|
|
costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings;
|
|
|
|
billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings;
|
|
|
|
the size and status of contract mobilization payments and
progress billings; and
|
|
|
|
the amounts owed to suppliers and subcontractors.
|
Some of these fluctuations can be significant.
As of September 30, 2009, we had working capital of
$115.8 million, an increase of $20.7 million over
December 31, 2008. Working capital is an important element
in expanding our bonding capacity, which enables us to bid on
larger and longer duration projects. The increase in working
capital was primarily the result of net income of
$22.9 million plus depreciation and deferred tax expense
totaling $15.4 million reduced by purchases of property and
equipment of $4.4 million and net repayment of debt of
$15.0 million.
The Company believes that it has sufficient liquid financial
resources, including the unused portion of its Credit Facility,
to fund its requirements for the next twelve months of
operations, including its bonding requirements, and the Company
expects no material adverse change in its liquidity. Future
developments or events, such as an increase in our level of
purchases of equipment to support significantly higher backlog
or an acquisition of another company besides RLW could, however,
affect our level of working capital.
Sources
of Capital
Revolving
Credit Facility
In addition to our available cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments balances and cash provided by operations,
we use borrowings under our Credit Facility with Comerica Bank
and its other syndicate members to finance our capital
expenditures and working capital needs.
The Credit Facility, which is due in 2012, allows for borrowings
of up to $75.0 million and is secured by all assets of the
Company, other than proceeds and other rights under our
construction contracts which are pledged to our bond surety. At
September 30, 2009, the aggregate borrowings outstanding
under the Credit Facility were $40.0 million, and the
aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding under the
Credit Facility was $1.8 million, which reduces
availability under the Credit Facility. Availability under the
Credit Facility was therefore $33.2 million at
September 30, 2009 without violating any of the financial
covenants discussed in the next paragraph.
S-46
The Credit Facility requires the payment of a quarterly
commitment fee of 0.25% per annum of the unused portion of the
Credit Facility. At our election, the loans under the Credit
Facility bear interest at either a LIBOR-based interest rate or
a prime-based interest rate. The average interest rate on funds
borrowed under the Credit Facility during the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately
3.25%. The Credit Facility is subject to our compliance with
certain covenants, including financial covenants at quarter-end
relating to fixed charges, leverage, tangible net worth, asset
coverage and consolidated net losses. We were in compliance with
all of these covenants at September 30, 2009 and,
currently, we do not anticipate any problem with complying with
these covenants.
The financial markets have recently experienced substantial
volatility as a result of disruptions in the credit markets. To
date we have experienced no difficulty in borrowing under our
Credit Facility and no change in its terms.
Mortgages
In 2001, we completed the construction of a new headquarters
building on land owned by us adjacent to our equipment repair
facility in Houston. The building was financed principally
through an additional mortgage of $1.1 million on the land
and facilities at a floating interest rate which at
September 30, 2009 was 3.50% per annum, repayable over
15 years.
Uses of
Capital
Contractual
Obligations
The following table sets forth our fixed, non-cancelable
obligations at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,181
|
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
$
|
41,179
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our obligations for interest are not included in the table above
as these amounts vary according to the levels of debt
outstanding at any time. Interest on our Credit Facility is paid
monthly and fluctuates with the balances outstanding during the
year, as well as with fluctuations in interest rates. In 2009,
interest on the Credit Facility was approximately $22,000. The
mortgages are expected to have future annual interest expense
payments of approximately $16,000 in less than one year, $34,000
in one to three years, $10,000 in four to five years and $1,000
for all years thereafter.
To manage risks of changes in the material prices and
subcontracting costs used in submitting bids for construction
contracts, we generally obtain firm quotations from our
suppliers and subcontractors before submitting a bid. These
quotations do not include any quantity guarantees, and we have
no obligation for materials or subcontract services beyond those
required to complete the contracts that we are awarded for which
quotations have been provided.
As is customary in the construction business, we are required to
provide surety bonds to secure our performance under
construction contracts. Our ability to obtain surety bonds
primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past
performance, management expertise and reputation and certain
external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety
market. Surety companies consider such factors in relationship
to the amount of our backlog and their underwriting standards,
which may change from time to time. We have pledged all proceeds
and other rights under our construction contracts to our bond
surety company. Events that affect the insurance and bonding
markets generally may result in bonding becoming more difficult
to obtain in the future, or being available only at a
significantly greater cost. To date, we have not encountered
difficulties or cost increases in obtaining new surety bonds.
S-47
Inflation
Until the first nine months of 2008, inflation had not had a
material impact on our financial results; however, that
periods increases in fuel prices affected our cost of
operations. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, prices we
paid for oil and fuel decreased. Anticipated increases or
reductions in these costs are considered in our bids to
customers on proposed new construction projects.
Where we are the successful bidder on a project, we execute
purchase orders with material suppliers and contracts with
subcontractors covering the prices of most materials and
services, other than oil and fuel products, thereby mitigating
future price increases and supply disruptions. These purchase
orders and contracts generally do not contain quantity
guarantees and we generally have no obligation for materials and
services beyond those required to complete the contracts with
our customers. There can be no assurance that oil and fuel used
in our business will be adequately covered by the estimated
escalation we have included in our bids or that all of our
vendors will fulfill their pricing and supply commitments under
their purchase orders and contracts with the Company. We adjust
our total estimated costs on our projects where we believe it is
probable that we will have cost increases which will not be
recovered from customers, vendors or re-engineering.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating
leases shown in the table above under Uses of
Capital Contractual Obligations.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, established principles and requirements for how an
acquirer of another business entity: (a) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase and (c) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
Also, all direct costs of the business combination must be
charged to expense on the financial statements of the acquirer
as incurred. The new standard revises previous guidance as to
the recording of post-combination restructuring plan costs by
requiring the acquirer to record such costs separately from the
business combination. The adoption of this statement on
January 1, 2009, did not have an effect on Sterlings
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB established a framework for
measuring fair value which requires expanded disclosure about
the information used to measure fair value. The standard applies
whenever other statements require or permit assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand
the use of fair value accounting in any new circumstances. We
adopted this standard on January 1, 2009, which did not
have a material impact on Sterlings financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a standard clarifying previous
guidance on how consolidated entities should account for and
report noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries.
The pronouncement standardizes the presentation of
noncontrolling interests (formally referred to as minority
interests) for both the consolidated balance sheet and
income statement. As a result of adopting this standard on
January 1, 2009, Sterlings financial statements
segregate net income as attributable to the Companys
common stockholders and noncontrolling owners interest.
In May 2009, the FASB set forth general standards of accounting
for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. This standard became effective in the second
quarter of 2009 and did not have a material impact on
Sterlings financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard to address the
elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose
entity. This standard will replace the quantitative-based risks
and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity
with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and
the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, this standard
will
S-48
provide more timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement with a variable interest entity.
This standard will become effective in the first quarter of
2010. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the Accounting Standards Codification was
established as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by
the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All
guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. This standard was effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material effect on Sterlings financial statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Changes in interest rates are one of our sources of market
risks. At September 30, 2009, $40 million of our
outstanding indebtedness was at floating interest rates. Based
on our average debt outstanding during 2009, we estimate that an
increase of 1.0% in the interest rate would have resulted in an
increase in our interest expense of approximately $6,000 in the
first nine months of 2009.
To manage risks of changes in material prices and subcontracting
costs used in tendering bids for construction contracts, we
generally obtain firm price quotations from our suppliers and
subcontractors, except for fuel and trucking, before submitting
a bid. These quotations do not include any quantity guarantees,
and we have no obligation for materials or subcontract services
beyond those required to complete the respective contracts that
we are awarded for which quotations have been provided.
During 2009, we commenced a strategy of investing in certain
securities, the assets of which are a crude oil commodity pool.
We believe that the gains and losses on these securities will
tend to offset increases and decreases in the price we pay for
diesel and gasoline fuel and reduce the volatility of such fuel
costs in our operations. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the Company had a realized gain of
$141,000 on these securities and an unrealized gain of $133,000.
We will continue to evaluate this strategy and may increase or
decrease our investment in these securities depending on our
forecast of the diesel fuel market and our operational
considerations. There can be no assurance that this strategy
will be successful.
S-49
BUSINESS
General
We are a leading heavy civil construction company that
specializes in the building, reconstruction and repair of
transportation and water infrastructure. Transportation
infrastructure projects include highways, roads, bridges, light
rail and commuter rail. Water infrastructure projects include
water, wastewater and storm drainage systems. We provide general
contracting services primarily to public sector clients,
including excavating, concrete and asphalt paving, installation
of large-diameter water and wastewater distribution systems;
construction of bridges and similar large structures;
construction of light rail and commuter rail infrastructure; and
concrete batch plant operations, concrete crushing and
aggregates operations. We perform the majority of the work
required by our contracts with our own crews and equipment.
Our business has a history of profitable growth, which we have
achieved by expanding both our service profile and our market
areas. This involves adding services, such as concrete
operations and design-build project delivery capabilities, in
order to capture a greater percentage of available work in
current and potential markets. It also involves strategically
expanding operations, either by establishing an office in a new
market, often after having successfully bid on and completed a
project in that market, or by acquiring a company that gives us
an immediate entry into a market.
Recent
RLW Acquisition
On December 3, 2009, we completed the acquisition of
privately-owned RLW, which is headquartered in Draper, Utah,
near Salt Lake City. RLW is a heavy civil construction business
focused on the construction of bridges and other structures,
roads and highways, and light and commuter rail projects,
primarily in Utah, with licenses to do business in surrounding
states. We paid approximately $64.7 million to acquire 80%
of the equity interests in RLW, and, in 2013, we have the option
to purchase, and the noncontrolling interest holders could
require us to purchase, the remaining 20% from four related
individuals who continue to manage the operations of RLW.
RLWs largest customer is UDOT, which is responsible for
planning, constructing, operating and maintaining the
6,000 miles of highway and over 1,700 bridges that make up
the Utah state highway system. RLW strives to provide efficient,
timely and profitable execution of construction projects, with a
particular emphasis on structures and innovative construction
methods. RLW has significant experience in obtaining and
profitably executing design-build and
CM/GC (construction manager/general contractor)
projects. We believe that design-build, CM/GC and other
alternative project delivery methods are increasingly being used
by public sector customers as alternatives to the traditional
fixed unit price low bid process. Approximately 89% of
RLWs backlog at September 30, 2009 was attributable
to design-build and CM/GC projects. Since its founding in 1975,
RLW has experienced profitable growth, capitalizing on
high-quality execution of projects and strong customer
relationships.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, RLW generated
revenue, net income before taxes and EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of
$112 million, $25 million and $26 million,
respectively. We purchased RLW based on an assumed sustainable
annual EBITDA in the range of $15 million to
$20 million. See Summary Summary
Historical and Pro Forma Financial and Operating Data for
a definition of EBITDA and a reconciliation of RLWs net
income to RLWs EBITDA for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, RLW had a backlog of
approximately $198 million, which consisted of
30 projects for 9 customers. See Selected
Historical Financial and Operating Data for information
regarding how backlog is calculated.
Rationale
for the RLW Acquisition
We acquired RLW for a number of reasons, including those listed
below:
Opportunity to Expand on RLWs Significant Experience in
Design-Build, CM/GC and Other Project Delivery
Methods. We believe that heavy civil construction
projects are increasingly being contracted and performed
utilizing design-build, CM/GC and other alternative project
delivery methods. Adding RLW expands
S-50
and strengthens our capabilities to compete for and obtain
design-build, CM/GC and other alternative types of delivery
method contracts. In addition, we anticipate being able to
expand on RLWs experience in successfully engaging in
construction management processes and entering into joint
venture arrangements.
Opportunity to Utilize RLWs Significant Structural
Construction Expertise. The core of RLWs
expertise is structural construction work, which includes
accelerated bridge construction methods, or ABC, as
well as concrete paving, parking garages, water tanks, dams,
pilings and shorings. We believe that these structural
construction capabilities can augment our ability to compete for
opportunities in Texas and Nevada, as well as allow us to serve
additional types of customers and position us for future growth.
Opportunity to Expand into an Attractive Market with Good
Long-Term Growth Dynamics. Utah has experienced
strong historical population growth, with a 23% increase from
2000 to 2008, which was almost triple the national average and
ranks Utah as the third fastest growing state during that time
period. According to UDOT, this trend is expected to continue,
with a 32% estimated growth rate from 2008 to 2020.
Opportunity to Complement our Existing Market Locations and
Advances our Strategy of Geographical
Diversification. RLWs business provides
diversification that can counterbalance factors affecting our
other markets such as weather, state and local government
funding shifts and federal allocations of transportation
expenditures. In addition, RLWs licensed status in other
growing western state markets, including Arizona and Nevada, can
allow us potentially to expand our operations as opportunities
present themselves in these surrounding markets.
Opportunity to Partner with a Strong and Innovative
Management Team with a Similar Corporate
Culture. The RLW team of managers and employees
have been responsible for significant and profitable growth.
This success has been built on experience, technical expertise,
excellent customer relationships and a strong work ethic. In
addition, RLW has been innovative with the types of construction
methods used, including its accelerated bridge construction
processes. We believe that these values, which are similar to
Sterlings values, will foster effective integration and
can serve as a platform for continued growth and success in
Utah, Nevada and other western states.
Opportunity to Benefit from RLWs Strong Financial
Results and Immediate Accretion to Our Earnings Per
Share. RLW has produced strong historical
profitability and backlog growth. We believe that the
acquisition will be immediately accretive to our earnings per
share.
Our
Business Strategy
Key features of our business strategy to create shareholder
value include:
Continue to Add Construction and Project Delivery
Capabilities. By adding capabilities that augment
our core contracting and construction competencies, we can
improve gross margin opportunities, more effectively compete for
contracts, and compete for contracts that might not otherwise be
available to us. We continue to investigate opportunities to
augment our staff with employees or management teams that would
bring us additional service capabilities. We also continue to
explore opportunities for acquisitions that augment our
capabilities, such as RLW, which added to our design-build and
structure construction capabilities, and RHB, which added to our
construction materials and asphalt paving capabilities.
Expand into Attractive New Markets and Selectively Pursue
Strategic Acquisitions. We will continue to seek
to identify attractive new markets and opportunities in western,
southwestern and southeastern U.S. markets. With our strong
financial position and publicly traded common stock, we believe
that we are an attractive acquiror for heavy civil construction
firms who have limited opportunities to achieve exit liquidity
with their business.
Apply Core Competencies Across our Markets. We
will seek to capitalize on opportunities to export our Texas
experience constructing water infrastructure projects and our
Nevada earthmoving, aggregates and asphalt paving experience
into Utah markets. Similarly, we believe that RLWs
experience with design-build, CM/GC and other alternative
project delivery methods in Utah can enhance opportunities for
us in our Texas and Nevada markets.
Increase our Market Leadership in our Core
Markets. We have a strong presence in a number of
markets in Texas, Utah and Nevada. We intend to continue to
expand our presence in these states and other
S-51
states where we believe contracting opportunities exist. We
believe that our core markets are generally experiencing strong
growth in their infrastructure needs caused by factors such as
an increasing population, robust demand for oil, gas and hard
mineral resources, the need for new water sources, flood and
subsidence control activities and, in the long-term, increased
federally-funded highway construction.
Position our Business for Future Infrastructure
Spending. As evidenced by the federal
governments recently enacted economic stimulus
legislation, we believe that there is a growing awareness of the
need to build, reconstruct and repair our countrys
infrastructure, including transportation infrastructure, such as
bridges, highways and mass transit systems, and water
infrastructure, such as water, wastewater and storm drainage
systems. We will continue to build our expertise and seek to
capture this infrastructure spending, seek to develop new
capabilities to serve these markets, and seek to maintain our
human and capital resources to effectively meet demand.
Continue to Attract, Retain and Develop our
Employees. We believe that our employees are key
to the successful implementation of our business strategy, and
we will continue allocating significant resources in order to
attract and retain talented managers and supervisory and field
personnel.
Markets
and Customers
Our
Markets
We operate in the heavy civil construction segment, specializing
in transportation and water infrastructure projects, which we
pursue in Texas, Utah, Nevada and other states where we see
contracting opportunities. In July 2009, we were the successful
bidder for a project in Hawaii on which we began work in the
fourth quarter of 2009. RLW has also completed construction
projects in Idaho, Wyoming and Arizona. We have also bid on
construction projects in California but have not been awarded
any such projects in that state.
Demand for transportation and water infrastructure depends on a
variety of factors, including overall population growth,
economic expansion and the vitality of the market areas in which
we operate, as well as unique local topographical, structural
and environmental issues. In addition to these factors, demand
for the replacement of infrastructure is driven by the general
aging of infrastructure and the need for technical improvements
to achieve more efficient or safer use of infrastructure and
resources. Funding for this infrastructure depends on federal,
state and local governmental resources, budgets and
authorizations.
State
Highway Markets
According to 2008 U.S. Census Bureau information, Texas is
the second largest state in population in the U.S., with
24.3 million people and a population growth of 17% from
2000 to 2008, approximately twice the 8% growth rate for the
U.S. as a whole over the same period. Three of the 10
largest cities in the U.S. are located in Texas, and we
have offices serving the areas in which each of them is located.
Utah, with a population of 2.7 million in 2008, was the
third fastest growing state from 2000 to 2008, with an increase
of 23%. Nevada had even more rapid growth, with the states
population expanding 30% from 2000 to 2.6 million people in
2008. Texas, Utah and Nevada are projected by the
U.S. Census Bureau to have populations of over
33 million, 3 million and 4 million,
respectively, by 2030.
According to a report prepared by FMI Corporation,
U.S. highway infrastructure spending is estimated to
increase by 5.4% in 2010 and 5.1% in 2011, and U.S. water
infrastructure spending is estimated to increase by 2.8% in 2010
and 3.6% in 2011.
Our highway and related bridge work is generally funded through
federal and state authorizations. The federal government enacted
the SAFETEA-LU bill in 2005, which authorized $286 billion
for transportation spending through 2009. The
U.S. Department of Transportation budget under SAFETEA-LU
for the Federal-Aid Highways Program was $39.4 billion of
federal financial assistance to the states for 2009 versus
$41.2 billion for 2008 and $38.0 billion for 2007.
Federal highway gasoline taxes used to
fund SAFETEA-LU
appropriations were less than budgeted for the federal
governments fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. A
successor federal funding program has not been passed by the
U.S. Congress, although there is a bill pending before the
U.S. House of Representatives that proposes spending
$450 billion over six years on federal transportation
projects, which is a 38% increase over the amount allocated
pursuant to the SAFETEA-LU bill. Because the SAFETEA-LU bill
expired on September 30, 2009, the federal government
rescinded a portion of
S-52
the funding previously committed to be provided to the states in
2009, with interim financial assistance being extended on a
month-to-month
basis, most recently through December 18, 2009, at
approximately 70% of the prior year SAFETEA-LU levels.
Reductions in federal funding will negatively impact the
states highway and bridge construction expenditures for
2010. We are unable to predict when or on what terms the federal
government might renew the SAFETEA-LU bill or enact other
similar legislation.
In February 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or
federal economic-stimulus legislation, was enacted by the
federal government that authorizes $26.7 billion for
highway and bridge construction. A significant portion of these
funds are to be used for
ready-to-go,
quick spending highway projects for which contracts can be
awarded quickly. The highway funds apportioned to Texas, Utah
and Nevada approximated $2.7 billion under the federal
economic-stimulus legislation, and the majority of such amount
will be expended in 2009 through 2011. State awards for highway
and bridge construction under the federal economic-stimulus
legislation through October 2009 were less than anticipated.
However, according to the American Road &
Transportation Builders Association, it is anticipated that
79.9% of $27.4 billion in projected spending on larger,
more complex transportation infrastructure projects will occur
in 2010, 2011 and 2012.
In January 2009, the 2030 Committee, appointed by TXDOT at the
request of the Governor of the State of Texas, submitted its
draft report of the transportation needs of Texas. The report
stated that With [the] population increase expected by
2030, transportation modes, costs and congestion are considered
a possible roadblock to Texas projected growth and
prosperity. The report further indicated that Texas needs
to spend approximately $313.0 billion (in 2008 dollars)
over the period 2009 through 2030 to prevent worsening
congestion and maintain economic competitiveness on its urban
highways and roads, to improve congestion/safety and partial
connectivity on its rural highways, and to replace bridges. The
2009 TXDOT budget for transportation construction projects was
approximately $3.7 billion, including stimulus funds (final
expenditures are not yet available), versus expenditures of
approximately $2.1 billion in 2008 and expenditures of
$2.7 billion in 2007.
In July 2009, the Texas legislature passed the
2010-2011
biennium budget for TXDOT, which included an aggregate of
$8.4 billion for construction of highways and bridges for
the fiscal years ending August 31, 2010 and 2011. Included
in the appropriation is $0.7 billion of federal
economic-stimulus funds. The budget also includes
$1.9 billion from the sale of $5.0 billion of general
obligation bonds approved by Texas voters in November 2007.
Texas is also authorized to sell an additional $1.0 billion
of these bonds for a revolving fund to be loaned by TXDOT to
cities, counties and other parties for the construction of
highways and bridges. Upon the repayment or sale of these loans,
TXDOT may loan the repayment/sales proceeds to similar parties
for construction of additional highways and bridges. In Texas,
substantial funds for transportation infrastructure spending are
also being provided by toll road and regional mobility
authorities for construction of toll roads, which provides
Sterling with additional construction contracting opportunities.
Utahs Long Range Transportation Plan for 2007-2030
projects spending for highway and bridge construction of
$18.9 billion; the Utah Governors recommendation for
such spending in 2010 is $617 million compared to
$1.3 billion expended in 2008 and $716 million
recommended in 2009. According to a report prepared by FMI
Corporation, road and bridge construction expenditures in Utah
are estimated to gradually increase in the three years after
2010.
Transportation construction expenditures as reported by NDOT
totaled $455 million in 2007 and $447 million in 2008.
Based on press statements by officials of NDOT, we estimate NDOT
expenditures in 2009 and 2010 will be between $300 million
and $400 million in each of those fiscal years, including
economic-stimulus funds.
Municipal
Markets
Our water and wastewater, underground utility, light rail and
commuter rail transit and non-highway paving work is generally
funded by municipalities and other local authorities. While the
size and growth rates of these markets are difficult to compute
as a whole, given the number of municipalities, the differences
in funding sources and variations in local budgets, management
estimates that the municipal markets in Texas and Nevada
together funded in excess of $1.0 billion of such projects
during 2009. Two of the many municipalities that we perform work
for are discussed below.
S-53
The City of Houstons estimated expenditures for 2008 on
storm drainage, street and traffic, waste water and water
capital improvements were $721 million. The most recently
adopted five-year plan includes $612 million in 2009 and
$517 million in 2010 for transportation and water
infrastructure projects.
The City of San Antonio has adopted a six-year capital
improvement plan for 2009 through 2014, which includes
$415 million for streets and $228 million for
drainage. The expenditures will be partially funded by the
$550 million bond program that the voters of the City of
San Antonio approved in May 2007. San Antonios
budget for such projects was $230 million for 2009 and is
$290 million for 2010.
We also do work for other cities, counties, business area
redevelopment authorities and regional authorities in Texas,
which have substantial water and transportation infrastructure
spending budgets.
In addition, while we currently have no municipal contracts in
the City of Las Vegas, that Citys final budget for roads
and flood projects is $284 million in 2009 and
$266 million in 2010. Management believes that there will
be opportunities for Sterling to bid on and obtain municipal
work in Las Vegas as well as Reno and Carson City.
Our
Customers
We are headquartered in Houston, and we serve the top markets in
Texas, including Houston, San Antonio,
Dallas/Fort Worth and Austin. We expanded our operations
into Nevada in 2007 and into Utah in December 2009, in each case
by acquiring a strong and profitable company with a
well-established market presence and ties to customers in the
state.
Although we occasionally undertake contracts for private
customers, the vast majority of our revenues are attributable to
work for public sector customers. In Texas, these customers
include TXDOT, county and municipal public works departments,
the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (or
Metro), the Harris County Toll Road Authority, North Texas
Transit Authority (or NTTA), regional transit and water
authorities, port authorities, school districts and municipal
utility districts. In Utah, our public sector customers include
UDOT and the Utah Transit Authority. In Nevada, our primary
public sector customer has been NDOT. In 2008, state highway and
related bridge work accounted for 68% of our consolidated
revenues, compared with 68% in 2007 and 67% in 2006 (in each
case excluding RLW work).
Our largest revenue customer is TXDOT. In 2008, contracts with
TXDOT represented 39.2% of our revenues. In 2008, contracts with
NDOT represented 21.3% of our revenues. In 2008, contracts with
UDOT represented 91% of RLWs revenues, and other public
sector revenue generated in Utah represented 4% of RLWs
revenues. We generally provide services to these customers
pursuant to contracts awarded through competitive bidding
processes.
In Texas, our municipal customers in 2008 included the City of
Houston (8.5% of our 2008 revenues), City of San Antonio
(4.2% of our revenues) and Harris County, Texas (3.5% of our
2008 revenues). In the past, we have also completed the
construction of certain infrastructure for new light rail
systems in Houston, Dallas and Galveston, and RLW has completed
light and commuter rail projects in Utah. We anticipate that
expenditures in the Cities of Houston and San Antonio for
road, rail and water infrastructure projects will continue to
increase due to these metropolitan areas steady gain in
population through migration of new residents, the annexation of
surrounding communities and the continuing programs to expand
storm water and flood control systems and deliver water to
suburban communities. We provide services to our municipal
customers exclusively pursuant to contracts awarded through
competitive bidding processes.
Competition
Our competitors include companies that we bid against for
construction contracts and compete against for short listings,
mandates and joint ventures. We have many competitors of
different sizes in the Texas, Utah and Nevada markets that we
primarily serve, and they include large national and regional
construction companies as well as many smaller contractors.
Historically, the construction business has not typically
required large amounts of capital, which can result in relative
ease of market entry for companies possessing acceptable
qualifications.
Factors influencing our competitiveness include price, our
reputation for quality, our innovativeness, our equipment fleet,
our financial strength, our surety bonding capacity and
prequalifications, our knowledge of
S-54
local markets and conditions, our project management and
estimating abilities, our customer relationships, our marketing
abilities, our ability to enter into strategic relationships
with other contractors and our ability to perform many aspects
of each project. Although some of our competitors are larger
than we are and may possess greater resources or provide more
vertically-integrated services, we believe that we are
well-positioned to compete in the markets in which we operate on
the basis of the foregoing factors.
We are unable to determine the size of many competitors because
they are privately owned, but we believe that we are one of the
larger participants in our Texas markets and one of the largest
contractors in Houston and San Antonio engaged in municipal
civil construction work. We believe that being a municipal civil
market contractor provides us with several advantages in the
Houston and San Antonio market, including greater
flexibility to manage our backlog in order to schedule and
deploy our workforce and equipment resources more efficiently;
more cost-effective purchasing of materials, insurance and
bonds; the ability to provide a broader range of services than
otherwise would be provided through subcontractors; and the
availability of substantially more capital and resources to
dedicate to each of our contracts. Because we own and maintain
most of the equipment required for our contracts and have the
experienced workforce to handle many types of municipal civil
construction, we are able to bid competitively on many
categories of contracts, especially complex, multi-task projects.
In Utah, RLW has been competitive, in part, because of
successful marketing efforts, design-build and CM/GC
capabilities and development of innovative methods for
completing projects. Competition for design-build projects is
not as focused on cost factors but is significantly dependent on
successful marketing efforts, historical reputation, quality of
designs, aesthetics and customer relationships. We believe that
we were one of the first construction companies to utilize
accelerated bridge construction technology to build bridges
offsite, move them to their location, and complete their
installation in a short period of time in order to minimize
mobility disruptions. In Nevada, we believe that we are a
leading asphalt paving contractor in suburban and rural highway
projects.
In the state highway markets, most of our competitors are large
regional contractors, and individual contracts tend to be larger
and require more specialized skills than those in the municipal
markets. Some of these competitors have the advantage of being
more vertically-integrated, or they specialize in certain types
of projects such as construction over water. However those
competitors, particularly in Texas, often have the disadvantage
of having to use a temporary, local workforce to complete each
of their state highway contracts. In contrast, we have a
permanent workforce who performs our state highway contracts in
Texas; however, we do rely on a temporary, unionized workforce
for performance of a portion of our state highway contracts in
Nevada and some seasonal workers in Utah.
During the last quarter of 2008 and the first nine months of
2009, the bidding environment in the Texas, Utah and Nevada
markets has been much more competitive. While our business
includes only minimal residential and commercial infrastructure
work, the severe fall-off in new projects in those markets has
resulted in some residential and commercial infrastructure
contractors bidding on smaller public sector transportation and
water infrastructure projects, sometimes at bid levels below our
break-even pricing, thus increasing competition and creating
downward pressure on bid prices in our markets. Traditional
competitors on larger transportation and water infrastructure
projects also appear to have been bidding at less than normal
margins in order to replenish their reduced backlogs. These
factors have limited our ability to maintain or increase our
backlog through successful bids for new projects and have
compressed the profitability on the new projects where we
submitted successful bids. While we have recently been more
aggressive in reducing the anticipated margins we use to bid on
some projects, we have not bid at anticipated loss margins in
order to obtain new backlog.
Backlog
Backlog is our estimate of the revenues that we expect to earn
in future periods on our construction projects. We generally add
the anticipated revenue value of each new project to our backlog
when management reasonably determines that we will be awarded
the contract and there are no known impediments to being awarded
the contract. We deduct from backlog the revenues earned on each
project during the applicable fiscal period. As construction on
our projects progresses, we also increase or decrease backlog to
take into account our estimates of the effects of changes in
estimated quantities, changed conditions, change orders and
other
S-55
variations from initially anticipated contract revenues,
including completion penalties and bonuses. At
September 30, 2009, our pro forma backlog of
$569 million included approximately $142 million of
expected revenues for which the contracts had not yet been
officially awarded or finalized as to price. Historically,
subsequent non-awards of contracts or finalization of price have
not materially affected our backlog, results of operations or
financial condition.
Substantially all of the contracts in our contract backlog may
be canceled at the election of the customer; however, we have
not been materially adversely affected by contract cancellations
or modifications in the past. See the section below entitled
Contracts Contract Management
Process.
Construction
Delivery Methods
Alternative construction delivery methods describe different
relationships among the owner, the builder and the designer of a
project. There are three primary construction delivery methods:
design-bid-build, design-build and construction management.
The traditional method by which most of our projects have
historically been completed is design-bid-build. Under this type
of construction delivery, the owner hires a design engineer to
design the project and then solicits bids from construction
firms and typically awards the contract to build the
pre-designed project to the lowest qualifying bidder. The
contractor to whom the project is awarded becomes the general
contractor and is responsible for completing the project in
accordance with the owners designs using the
contractors own employees or resources, or subcontractors.
Projects under this method are typically fixed unit prices
contracts.
Design-build is increasingly being used by public entities as a
method of project delivery. Unlike traditional projects where
the owner first hires a design firm or designs a project itself
and then puts the project out to bid for construction,
design-build projects provide the owner with a single point of
responsibility and a single contact for both final design and
construction. The owner selects a builder who hires the design
team as required. This project delivery method is typically
undertaken through either fixed unit price contracts or lump sum
contracts.
Construction management is a newer method of delivering a
project whereby a contractor agrees to manage a project for the
owner for an
agreed-upon
fee, which may be fixed or may vary based upon negotiated
factors. The owner of the project typically hires the contractor
as a construction manager early in the design phase of the
project. The construction manager works with the design team to
help ensure that the design is something that can in fact be
built within the owners desired cost and other parameters
and that the construction contractors will be able to understand
the design drawings and specifications. There are two basic
types of construction management: construction manager as
advisor and construction manager at risk. In the construction
manager as advisor variation, the construction manager acts as a
technical consultant to the owner of the project and has no
legal responsibility for the performance of the actual
construction work. In the construction manager at risk
variation, the construction manager becomes the prime contractor
during the construction phase and awards subcontracts. We more
typically are a construction manager at risk through a
construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) relationship. In
either type of construction management process, portions of a
project are often submitted for bid during the course of the
construction manager relationship, with the construction manager
bidding, and oftentimes having the first right to bid, on
portions of the project.
Contracts
Types
of Contracts
We provide our services primarily by using traditional general
contracting arrangements, including fixed unit price contracts,
lump sum contracts and cost plus contracts.
Fixed unit price contracts are generally used in
competitively-bid public civil construction contracts.
Contractors under fixed unit price contracts are generally
committed to provide all of the resources required to complete
the contract for a fixed price per unit. These contracts are
generally subject to negotiated change
S-56
orders, frequently due to differences in site conditions from
those initially anticipated. Some fixed unit price contracts
provide for penalties if the contract is not completed on time,
or incentives if it is completed ahead of schedule.
Under a lump sum contract, the contractor typically agrees to
deliver a completed project in accordance with the
contracts requirements for a specific price, and the
customer agrees to pay the price upon completion of the work or
according to a negotiated payment schedule. In developing a lump
sum bid, the contractor estimates the costs of labor and
materials and adds an amount for overhead and profit. The amount
of the profit may be increased based on the builders
assessment of risk. If the actual costs of labor and materials
are higher than the contractors estimate, the profit will
be reduced or become a loss; if the actual costs are lower, the
contractor gets more profit.
In a cost plus contract, the owner of a project generally agrees
to pay the cost of all of the contractors labor and
materials plus an amount for contractor overhead and profit
(usually as a percentage of the labor and material cost). If
actual costs are lower than the estimate, the owner benefits
from the cost savings. If actual costs are higher than the
estimate, the owner bears the economic burden of the additional
costs.
Contract
Management Process
We identify potential contracts from a variety of sources,
including through subscriber services that notify us of
contracts out for bid; through advertisements by federal, state
and local governmental entities; through our business
development efforts; through contacts at government agencies;
and through meetings with other participants in the construction
industry. After determining which contracts are available, we
decide which contracts to pursue based on such factors as the
relevant skills required, the contract size and duration, the
availability of our personnel and equipment, the size and makeup
of our current backlog, our competitive advantages and
disadvantages, prior experience, the contracting agency or
customer, the source of contract funding, geographic location,
likely competition, construction risks, gross margin
opportunities, penalties or incentives and the type of contract.
As a condition to pursuing some contracts, we are required to
complete a prequalification process with the applicable agency
or customer. Some customers, such as TXDOT, NDOT and UDOT,
require yearly prequalification, and other customers have
experience requirements specific to the contract. The
prequalification process generally limits bidders to those
companies with the operational experience and financial
capability to effectively complete the particular contract in
accordance with the plans, specifications and construction
schedule.
There are several factors that can create variability in
contract performance and financial results compared to our bid
assumptions on a contract. The most significant of these include
the completeness and accuracy of our original bid analysis,
recognition of costs associated with added scope changes,
extended overhead due to customer and weather delays,
subcontractor performance issues, changes in productivity
expectations, site conditions that differ from those assumed in
the original bid, and changes in the availability and proximity
of materials. In addition, our original bids for some contracts
are based on the contract customers estimates of the
quantities needed to complete a contract. If the quantities
ultimately needed are different, our backlog and financial
performance on the contract will change. All of these factors
can lead to inefficiencies in contract performance, which can
increase costs and lower profits. Conversely, if any of these or
other factors is more positive than the assumptions in our bid,
contract profitability can improve. Design-build projects carry
additional risks such as design error risk and the risk
associated with estimating quantities and prices before the
project design is completed. Design errors may result in higher
than anticipated construction costs and additional liability to
the contract owner. Although we manage this additional risk by
adding contingencies to our bid amounts, obtaining errors and
omissions insurance and obtaining indemnifications from our
design consultants where possible, there is no guarantee that
these risk management strategies will always be successful.
The estimating process for our traditional fixed unit price
competitive bid contracts typically involves three phases.
Initially, we consider the level of anticipated competition and
our available resources for the
S-57
prospective project. If we then decide to continue considering a
project, we undertake the second phase of the contract process
and spend up to six weeks performing a detailed review of the
plans and specifications, summarize the various types of work
involved and related estimated quantities, determine the
contract duration and schedule and highlight the unique and
riskier aspects of the contract. Concurrent with this process,
we estimate the cost and availability of labor, material,
equipment, subcontractors and the project team required to
complete the contract on time and in accordance with the plans
and specifications. Substantially all of our estimates are made
on a
per-unit
basis for each line item, with the typical contract containing
50 to 400 line items. The final phase consists of a detailed
review of the estimate by management, including, among other
things, assumptions regarding cost, approach, means and methods,
productivity, risk and the estimated profit margin. This profit
amount will vary according to managements perception of
the degree of difficulty of the contract, the current
competitive climate and the size, availability of resources and
makeup of our backlog. Our project managers are intimately
involved throughout the estimating and construction process so
that contract issues, and risks, can be understood and addressed
on a timely basis.
Although the factors described above are relevant in determining
the appropriate amount bid, the contracting process is managed
differently if the project is to be performed on a design-build
basis or a
CM/GC basis.
For design-build projects, we assemble a team that may include
project managers, engineers, quality managers and surveyors, to
learn about a project that we have identified as one on which we
may desire to bid. For some projects with UDOT,
pre-qualification for the project is required wherein we prepare
a description of our financial strengths, past experience on
similar types of projects and the persons who will be on the
project management and design team. If we meet the
pre-qualification requirements, UDOT will usually set forth a
short list of three to five contractors to respond to a request
for proposal, generally within three months. Utilizing the
limited design specifications provided by UDOT, we generally
meet weekly over a two to three month period with design
engineers to generate a bid containing quantities, prices,
timing and a description of our approach for completing the
project. UDOT then reviews the bids and selects the one that has
the best value to price, and considers factors such as
contractor qualifications, the time estimated to complete the
project and the price bid.
For our UDOT CM/GC projects, UDOT typically sends out a request
for proposal to hire a general contractor for a project. UDOT
scores each contractor that submits a bid based on the unit
prices submitted for five to twenty items that comprise
approximately 10% to 20% of the project design, the profit
margin proposed, the experience of the contractor for similar
types of projects, the contractors approach to completing
the specific project and whether the contractor understands the
CM/GC process. A committee reviews each bid and determines the
best value winner to be the general contractor. If we are the
winning general contractor, we work with UDOT and the engineer
to design the project. As various phases of the project are
designed, we usually submit bids to construct each phase of the
project for which we are qualified. If our bid is within 5% of
the cost estimates determined by UDOT and the engineer, then we
will generally be awarded the contract for a particular phase;
if there is more than a 10% difference, then UDOT negotiates
with us on the appropriate contract price; and if those
negotiations are not successful, then UDOT can terminate our
contract.
To manage risks of changes in material prices and subcontracting
costs used in tendering bids for construction contracts, we
generally obtain firm price quotations from our suppliers and
subcontractors, except for fuel and trucking, before submitting
a bid. For fixed unit price contracts, these quotations do not
include any quantity guarantees, and we have no obligation for
materials or subcontract services beyond those required to
complete the respective contracts that we are awarded for which
quotations have been provided. For design-build and CM/GC
projects, lump sum subcontracts are often executed with
subcontractors.
During the construction phase of a contract, we monitor our
progress by comparing actual costs incurred and quantities
completed to date with budgeted amounts and the contract
schedule, and periodically prepare an updated estimate of total
forecasted revenue, cost and expected profit for the contract.
During the normal course of most contracts, the customer, and
sometimes the contractor, initiates modifications or changes to
the original contract to reflect, among other things, changes in
quantities, specifications or design, method or manner of
performance, facilities, materials, site conditions and the
period for completion of the work. In many cases, final contract
quantities may differ from those specified by the
S-58
customer. Generally, the scope and price of these modifications
are documented in a change order to the original
contract and reviewed, approved and paid in accordance with the
normal change order provisions of the contract. We are often
required to perform extra or change order work under our fixed
unit price contracts as directed by the customer even if the
customer has not agreed in advance on the scope or price of the
work to be performed. This process may result in disputes over
whether the work performed is beyond the scope of the work
included in the original contract plans and specifications or,
even if the customer agrees that the work performed qualifies as
extra work, the price that the customer is willing to pay for
the extra work. These disputes may not be settled to our
satisfaction. Even when the customer agrees to pay for the extra
work, we may be required to fund the cost of the work for a
lengthy period of time until the change order is approved and
funded by the customer. In addition, any delay caused by the
extra work may adversely impact the timely scheduling of other
work on the contract (or on other contracts) and our ability to
meet contract milestone dates.
The process for resolving contract claims varies from one
contract to another but, in general, we attempt to resolve
claims at the project supervisory level through the normal
change order process or, if necessary, with higher levels of
management within our organization and the customers
organization. Regardless of the process, when a potential claim
arises on a contract, we typically have the contractual
obligation to perform the work and must incur the related costs.
We do not recoup the costs unless and until the claim is
resolved, which could take a significant amount of time.
Most of our construction contracts provide for termination of
the contract for the convenience of the customer, with
provisions to pay us only for work performed through the date of
termination. Our backlog and results of operations have not been
materially adversely affected by these provisions in the past.
We act as the prime contractor on the majority of the
construction contracts that we undertake. We generally complete
the majority of the work on our contracts with our own
resources, and we typically subcontract only specialized
activities, such as traffic control, electrical systems,
signage, trucking and, in Utah, earthmoving. As the prime
contractor, we are responsible for the performance of the entire
contract, including subcontract work. Thus, we are subject to
increased costs associated with the failure of one or more
subcontractors to perform as anticipated. We manage this risk by
reviewing the size of the subcontract, the financial stability
of the subcontractor and other factors. Although we generally do
not require that our subcontractors furnish a bond or other type
of security to guarantee their performance, we require
performance and payment bonds on many specialized or large
subcontract portions of our contracts. Disadvantaged business
enterprise regulations require us to use our best efforts to
subcontract a specified portion of contract work performed for
governmental entities to certain types of subcontractors,
including minority- and women-owned businesses. We have not
experienced significant costs associated with subcontractor
performance issues in the past.
Joint
Ventures
We participate in joint ventures with other large construction
companies and other partners, typically for large, technically
complex projects, including design-build projects, when it is
desirable to share risk and resources in order to seek a
competitive advantage or when the project is too large for us to
obtain sufficient bonding. Joint venture partners typically
provide independently prepared estimates, furnish employees and
equipment, enhance bonding capacity and often also bring local
knowledge and expertise. We select our joint venture partners
based on our analysis of their construction and financial
capabilities, expertise in the type of work to be performed and
past working relationships with us, among other criteria.
Under a joint venture agreement, one partner is typically
designated as the sponsor. The sponsoring partner typically
provides all administrative, accounting and most of the project
management support for the project and generally receives a fee
from the joint venture for these services. We have been
designated as the sponsoring partner in certain of our current
joint venture projects and are a non-sponsoring partner in
others.
The joint ventures contract with the project owner
typically imposes joint and several liability on the joint
venture partners. Although our agreements with our joint venture
partners provide that each party will
S-59
assume and pay its share of any losses resulting from a project,
if one of our partners was unable to pay its share, we would be
fully liable under our contract with the project owner.
Circumstances that could lead to a loss under these guarantee
arrangements include a partners inability to contribute
additional funds to the venture in the event that the project
incurred a loss or additional costs that we could incur should
the partner fail to provide the services and resources toward
project completion that had been committed to in the joint
venture agreement.
Insurance
and Bonding
All of our buildings and equipment are covered by insurance, at
levels which our management believes to be adequate. In
addition, we maintain general liability and excess liability
insurance, all in amounts consistent with our risk of loss and
industry practice. Except for RLW, which has workers
compensation insurance, we self-insure our workers
compensation and health claims subject to stop-loss insurance
coverage.
As a normal part of the construction business, we are generally
required to provide various types of surety and payment bonds
that provide an additional measure of security for our
performance under the contract. Typically, a bidder for a
contract must post a bid bond, generally for 5% to 10% of the
amount bid, and on winning the bid, must post a performance and
payment bond for 100% of the contract amount. Upon completion of
a contract, before receiving final payment on the contract, a
contractor must post a maintenance bond for generally 1% of the
contract amount for one to two years. Our ability to obtain
surety bonds depends upon our capitalization, working capital,
aggregate contract size, past performance, management expertise
and external factors, including the capacity of the overall
surety market. Surety companies consider such factors in light
of the amount of our backlog that we have currently bonded and
their current underwriting standards, which may change from time
to time. As is customary, we have agreed to indemnify our
bonding company for all losses incurred by it in connection with
bonds that are issued, and we have granted our bonding company a
security interest in certain assets as collateral for such
obligation.
Employees
As of December 3, 2009, on a combined basis Sterling and
RLW had approximately 1,132 employees, including 26 project
managers and approximately 56 superintendents who manage over
151 fully-equipped crews in our construction business. Of such
employees, approximately 67 were located in our Houston
headquarters, with most of the others being field personnel. Of
our Nevada employees, 16 were union members represented by three
unions at December 3, 2009.
Our business is dependent upon a readily available supply of
management, supervisory and field personnel. Substantially all
of our employees who work on our contracts in Texas are a
permanent part of our workforce, and we generally do not rely on
temporary employees to complete these contracts. In contrast,
many of our employees who work on our contracts in Utah and
Nevada are seasonal employees. In the past, we have been able to
attract sufficient numbers of personnel to support the growth of
our operations.
We conduct extensive safety training programs, which have
allowed us to maintain a high safety level at our worksites. All
newly-hired employees undergo an initial safety orientation, and
for certain types of projects, we conduct specific hazard
training programs. Our project foremen and superintendents
conduct weekly
on-site
safety meetings, and our full-time safety inspectors make random
site safety inspections and perform assessments and training if
infractions are discovered. In addition, all of our
superintendents and project managers are required to complete an
OSHA-approved safety course.
Properties
We own our headquarters office building in Houston, Texas, which
is located on a
seven-acre
parcel of land on which our Texas equipment repair center is
also located. We also own land in Dallas and San Antonio on
which we plan to construct offices and repair facilities.
Pending completion of these offices, we lease office facilities
in these locations. In order to complete most contracts in
Texas, we lease small parcels of real estate
S-60
near the site of a contract job site to store materials, locate
equipment, conduct concrete crushing and pugging operations, and
provide offices for the contracting customer, its
representatives and our employees.
For our Utah operations, we lease office space in Draper, Utah,
near Salt Lake City, and we lease repair facilities in West
Jordan City, Utah as well.
For our Nevada operations, we lease office space in Reno,
Nevada, and we have office and repair facilities located on a
forty-five acre parcel of land in Lovelock, Nevada. We also
lease the right to mine stone and sand at a quarry in Carson
City, Nevada. Unlike in Texas and Utah where we acquire
aggregates from third-party suppliers, in Nevada, we generally
source and produce our own aggregates, either from the Carson
City quarry or from other sources near job sites where we enter
into short-term leases to acquire the aggregates necessary for
the job. In order to complete most contracts in Nevada, we also
lease small parcels of real estate near the site of a contract
job site to store materials, locate equipment, and provide
offices for the contracting customer, its representatives and
our employees.
Government
and Environmental Regulations
Our operations are subject to compliance with numerous
regulatory requirements of federal, state and local agencies and
authorities, including regulations concerning safety, wage and
hour, and other labor issues, immigration controls, vehicle and
equipment operations and other aspects of our business. For
example, our construction operations are subject to the
requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA,
and comparable state laws directed toward the protection of
employees. In addition, most of our construction contracts are
entered into with public authorities, and these contracts
frequently impose additional governmental requirements,
including requirements regarding labor relations and
subcontracting with designated classes of disadvantaged
businesses.
All of our operations are also subject to federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the environment,
including those relating to discharges into air, water and land,
the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, the
handling of underground storage tanks and the cleanup of
properties affected by hazardous substances. For example, we
must apply water or chemicals to reduce dust on road
construction projects and to contain contaminants in storm
run-off water at construction sites. In certain circumstances,
we may also be required to hire subcontractors to dispose of
hazardous wastes encountered on a project in accordance with a
plan approved in advance by the customer. Certain environmental
laws impose substantial penalties for non-compliance and others,
such as the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, impose strict,
retroactive, joint and several liability upon persons
responsible for releases of hazardous substances.
CERCLA and comparable state laws impose liability, without
regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on
certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a
hazardous substance into the environment. These
persons include the owner or operator of the site where the
release occurred and companies that disposed or arranged for the
disposal of the hazardous substances found at the site. Under
CERCLA, these persons may be subject to joint and several
liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances
that have been released into the environment, for damages to
natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies.
CERCLA also authorizes the federal Environmental Protection
Agency, or EPA, and, in some instances, third parties, to act in
response to threats to the public health or the environment and
to seek to recover from the responsible classes of persons the
costs they incur.
Solid wastes, which may include hazardous wastes, are subject to
the requirements of the Federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, the
federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, referred to as
RCRA, and comparable state statutes. Although we do not generate
solid waste, we occasionally dispose of solid waste on behalf of
customers. From time to time, the EPA considers the adoption of
stricter disposal standards for non-hazardous wastes. Moreover,
it is possible that additional wastes will in the future be
designated as hazardous wastes. Hazardous wastes are
subject to more rigorous and costly disposal requirements than
are non-hazardous wastes.
S-61
Legal
Proceedings
We are and may in the future be involved as a party to various
legal proceedings that are incidental to the ordinary course of
business. We regularly analyze current information about these
proceedings and, as necessary, provide accruals for probable
liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel,
there are currently no threatened or pending legal matters that
would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact
on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
S-62
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the names and ages of each of our
current directors and executive officers and the positions they
held as of December 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Patrick T. Manning
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
63
|
|
Joseph P. Harper, Sr.
|
|
President, Treasurer & Chief Operating Officer, Director
|
|
|
63
|
|
James H. Allen, Jr.
|
|
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
68
|
|
Roger M. Barzun
|
|
Senior Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel
|
|
|
68
|
|
John D. Abernathy
|
|
Director
|
|
|
72
|
|
Robert W. Frickel
|
|
Director
|
|
|
65
|
|
Donald P. Fusilli, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
58
|
|
Maarten D. Hemsley
|
|
Director
|
|
|
60
|
|
Christopher H. B. Mills
|
|
Director
|
|
|
57
|
|
Milton L. Scott
|
|
Director
|
|
|
53
|
|
David R. A. Steadman
|
|
Director
|
|
|
72
|
|
Patrick T. Manning. Mr. Manning joined
the predecessor of Texas Sterling Construction Co., the
Companys Texas construction subsidiary, which along with
its predecessors is referred to as TSC, in 1971 and led its move
from Detroit, Michigan into the Houston market in 1978. He has
been TSCs President and Chief Executive Officer since 1998
and Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company since July 2001. Mr. Manning has
served on a variety of construction industry committees,
including the Gulf Coast Trenchless Association and the Houston
Contractors Association, where he served as a member of
the board of directors and as President from 1987 to 1993. He
attended Michigan State University from 1969 to 1972.
Joseph P. Harper, Sr. Mr. Harper has
been employed by TSC since 1972. He was Chief Financial Officer
of TSC for approximately 25 years until August 2004, when
he became Treasurer of TSC. In addition to his financial
responsibilities, Mr. Harper has performed both estimating
and project management functions. Mr. Harper has been a
director and the Companys President and Chief Operating
Officer since July 2001, and in May 2006 was elected Treasurer.
Mr. Harper is a certified public accountant.
James H. Allen, Jr. Mr. Allen became
the Companys Senior Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer in August 2007. He spent approximately
30 years with Arthur Andersen & Co., including
19 years as an audit and business advisory partner and as
head of the firms Houston office construction industry
practice. After being retired for several years, he became chief
financial officer of a process chemical manufacturer and served
in that position for over three years prior to joining the
Company. Mr. Allen is a certified public accountant.
Roger M. Barzun. Mr. Barzun has been the
Companys Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
since August 1991. He was elected a Senior Vice President from
May 1994 until July 2001 and again in March 2006.
Mr. Barzun has been a lawyer since 1968 and is a member of
the bar of both New York and Massachusetts. Mr. Barzun also
serves as general counsel to other corporations from time to
time on a part-time basis.
John D. Abernathy. Mr. Abernathy was
Chief Operating Officer of Patton Boggs LLP, a Washington D.C.
law firm, from January 1995 through May 2004 when he retired. He
is also a director of Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., a New
York Stock Exchange-listed company that manufactures generic and
specialty drugs, and Neuro-Hitech, Inc., a company that
manufactures generic drugs, the shares of which are traded on
the
over-the-counter
market. Mr. Abernathy is a certified public accountant. In
December 2005, Mr. Abernathy was first elected Lead
Director by the independent members of the Board of Directors.
Robert W. Frickel. Mr. Frickel is the
founder and President of R.W. Frickel Company, P.C., a
public accounting firm that provides audit, tax and consulting
services primarily to companies in the construction industry.
Prior to the founding of R.W. Frickel Company in 1974,
Mr. Frickel was employed by Ernst & Ernst.
Mr. Frickel is a certified public accountant.
S-63
Donald P. Fusilli, Jr. Mr. Fusilli
is presently the principal of the Telum Group, a professional
consulting firm. From January 2008 to January 2009, he was the
Chief Executive Officer of a marine services subsidiary of David
Evans and Associates, Inc., a company that provides underwater
mapping and analysis services. From May 1973 until September
2006, Mr. Fusilli served in a variety of capacities at
Michael Baker Corporation, a public company listed on the
American Stock Exchange that provides a variety of professional
engineering services spanning the complete life cycle of
infrastructure and managed asset projects. Mr. Fusilli
joined Michael Baker Corporation as an engineer and over the
course of his career rose to president and chief executive
officer in April 2001. From September 2006 to January 2008,
Mr. Fusilli was an independent consultant providing
strategic planning, marketing development and operations
management services. Mr. Fusilli is a director of RTI
International Metals, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange-listed
company that is a leading U.S. producer of titanium mill
products and fabricated metal components. He holds a Civil
Engineering degree from Villanova University, a Juris Doctor
degree from Duquesne University School of Law and attended the
Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School.
Maarten D. Hemsley. Mr. Hemsley served as
the Companys President and Chief Operating Officer from
1988 until 2001, and as Chief Financial Officer from 1998 until
August 2007. From January 2001 to May 2002, Mr. Hemsley was
also a consultant to, and thereafter has been an employee of, JO
Hambro Capital Management Limited, which is part of JO Hambro
Capital Management Group Limited, or JOHCMG, an investment
management company based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Hemsley
has served since 2001 as Fund Manager of JOHCMGs
Leisure & Media Venture Capital Trust, plc, and since
February 2005 as Senior Fund Manager of its Trident Private
Equity II LLP investment fund. Mr. Hemsley is a
director of Tech/Ops Sevcon, Inc., a U.S. public company
that manufactures electronic controls for electric vehicles and
other equipment, and of a number of privately-held companies in
the United Kingdom. Mr. Hemsley is a Fellow of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
Christopher H. B. Mills. Mr. Mills is a
director of JOHCMG. Prior to founding JOHCMG in 1993,
Mr. Mills was employed by Montagu Investment Management and
its successor company, Invesco MIM, as an investment manager and
director, from 1975 to 1993. He is the Chief Executive of North
Atlantic Smaller Companies Investment Trust plc, which is a part
of JOHCMG. Mr. Mills is a director of SunLink Healthcare
Systems, Inc., a publicly-traded, non-urban community healthcare
provider for seven hospitals and related businesses in four
states in the Southwest and Midwest. Mr. Mills also serves
as a director of a number of public and private companies
outside of the U.S. in which JOHCMG funds may have
investments.
Milton L. Scott. Mr. Scott is Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Tagos Group, a strategic
advisory and services company in supply chain management,
transportation and logistics, and integrated supply. He was
previously associated with Complete Energy Holdings, LLC, a
company of which he was Managing Director until January 2006 and
which he co-founded in January 2004 to acquire, own and operate
power generation assets in the United States. From March 2003 to
January 2004, Mr. Scott was a Managing Director of The
StoneCap Group, an entity formed to acquire, own and operate
power generation assets. From October 1999 to November 2002,
Mr. Scott served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Administrative Officer at Dynegy Inc., a public company that was
a market leader in power distribution, marketing and trading of
gas, power and other commodities, midstream services and
electric distribution. From July 1977 to October 1999,
Mr. Scott was with the Houston office of Arthur Andersen
LLP, a public accounting firm, where he served as partner in
charge of the Southwest Region Technology and Communications
practice.
David R. A. Steadman. Mr. Steadman is
President of Atlantic Management Associates, Inc., a management
services and investment group. An engineer by profession,
Mr. Steadman served as Vice President of the Raytheon
Company from 1980 until 1987 where he was responsible for
commercial telecommunications and data systems businesses in
addition to setting up a corporate venture capital portfolio.
Subsequent to that and until 1989, Mr. Steadman was
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GCA Corporation, a
manufacturer of semiconductor production equipment.
Mr. Steadman serves as a director of Aavid Thermal
Technologies, Inc., a provider of thermal management solutions
for the electronics industry, a privately-held company.
Mr. Steadman also serves as Chairman of Tech/Ops Sevcon,
Inc., a public company that manufactures electronic controls for
electric vehicles and other equipment. Mr. Steadman is a
Visiting Lecturer in Business Administration at the Darden
School of the University of Virginia.
S-64
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock at December 1,
2009, for:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our executive officers named above in
Management;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors; and
|
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and includes sole or shared voting or investment
power with respect to securities. Except as indicated by
footnote, and subject to applicable community property laws, the
persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment
power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them, and their address is 20810 Fernbush
Lane, Houston, Texas 77073. The percentage of beneficial
ownership is based on 13,288,244 shares of common stock
outstanding at November 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Stock Owned
|
|
|
Purchase*
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
Patrick T. Manning(1)
|
|
|
46,427
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
75,227
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Joseph P. Harper, Sr.(2)
|
|
|
396,474
|
|
|
|
163,574
|
|
|
|
560,048
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
James H. Allen, Jr.
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
9,138
|
|
|
|
19,138
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Roger M. Barzun
|
|
|
22,161
|
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
25,321
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
John D. Abernathy(7)
|
|
|
52,331
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
57,331
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Robert W. Frickel(7)
|
|
|
70,169
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
87,169
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Donald P. Fusilli, Jr.(7)
|
|
|
6,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,962
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Maarten D. Hemsley(3)(7)
|
|
|
174,788
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
183,188
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Christopher H. B. Mills(7)
|
|
|
20,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,169
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Milton L. Scott(7)
|
|
|
8,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,169
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
David R. A. Steadman(7)
|
|
|
27,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,169
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP
75 State Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201(4)
|
|
|
907,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
907,220
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201(5)
|
|
|
1,086,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086,413
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(11 persons)(6)
|
|
|
834,819
|
|
|
|
235,072
|
|
|
|
1,069,891
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
These are shares that the person, entity or group could acquire
within 60 days of December 1, 2009. |
|
+ |
|
Less than one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
All of these shares have been pledged as security. |
|
(2) |
|
This number includes 8,000 shares held by Mr. Harper
as custodian for his grandchildren. |
|
(3) |
|
This number excludes shares owned by the Maarten and Mavis
Hemsley Family Foundation. Of the total number of shares,
143,924 shares are pledged as security. |
S-65
|
|
|
(4) |
|
This number is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2009. Of
this number, Wellington Management Company, LLP claims shared
voting power over 713,129 of the shares and shared dispositive
power over all of the shares. |
|
(5) |
|
This number is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2009. Of
this number, T. Rowe Price claims sole voting power over 461,613
of the shares and sole dispositive power over all of the shares. |
|
(6) |
|
See the footnotes above for a description of certain of the
shares included in this total. |
|
(7) |
|
This number includes 2,800 restricted shares awarded to the
beneficial owner in his capacity as a non-employee director. The
restrictions expire on the day preceding the 2010 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders, but earlier if the director dies or becomes
disabled or if there is a change in control of the Company. The
shares are forfeited before the expiration of the restrictions
if the director ceases to be a director other than because of
his death or disability. |
S-66
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that sales of shares or
the availability of shares for sale will have on the market
price of our common stock prevailing from time to time.
Nevertheless, sales of significant amounts of our common stock
in the public market, or the perception that those sales may
occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices and
impair our future ability to raise capital through the sale of
our equity at a time and price we deem appropriate.
Upon the completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of
outstanding warrants or options, we will have
15,685,244 shares (or in the event the underwriters
over-allotment option is exercised in full,
16,045,244 shares) of our common stock outstanding. Of
these shares, 13,644,997 shares (or in the event the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full,
14,004,997 shares) will be freely tradable without
restriction, except for any shares of our common stock purchased
in this offering by our affiliates, as that term is
defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act, which would
be subject to the limitations and restrictions described below.
The remaining 2,040,247 shares of our common stock to be
outstanding upon completion of this offering are deemed
restricted securities, as that term is defined under
Rule 144 of the Securities Act, are held by affiliates and
must be sold in compliance with Rule 144 or are subject to
the lock-up
agreements described in Underwriting. Securities
that are restricted or held by affiliates may be sold in the
U.S. public market only if registered or if they qualify
for an exemption from registration under the provisions of
Rule 144 or Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act,
which rules are described below. Of the 2,040,247 shares of
our common stock that are deemed restricted and that will be
outstanding upon completion of this offering,
1,208,428 shares would qualify for exemption under
Rule 144.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a
person, or persons whose shares must be aggregated, who is not
deemed to have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the
three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned
restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for at
least six months (including any period of consecutive ownership
of preceding non-affiliated holders) would be entitled to sell
those shares, subject only to the availability of current public
information about us. A non-affiliated person who has
beneficially owned restricted securities within the meaning of
Rule 144 for at least one year would be entitled to sell
those shares without regard to the provisions of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, our
affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates
are entitled to sell upon expiration of the
lock-up
agreements described below, within any three-month period
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus
supplement, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater
of:
|
|
|
|
|
one percent of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding, which will equal approximately 156,852 shares
(or, in the event the underwriters over-allotment option
is exercised in full, 160,452 shares) immediately after
this offering, or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the
Nasdaq during the four calendar weeks preceding the date of
filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates are also generally
subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice
requirements and to the availability of current public
information about us.
Lock-Up
Agreements
For a description of the
90-day
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters that restrict sales of shares
by us and by our executive officers and directors, see
Underwriting
Lock-Up
Agreements.
S-67
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the
underwriting agreement, the underwriters named below have agreed
to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to such underwriters,
the number of shares of common stock set forth opposite their
names below:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
D.A. Davidson & Co.
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, LLC
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,400,000
|
|
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject
to their acceptance of the shares from us. The underwriting
agreement provides that the obligation of the underwriters to
purchase the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus
supplement is subject to the satisfaction of the conditions
contained in the underwriting agreement. The underwriters must
purchase all of the shares of common stock offered hereby if any
of the shares are purchased, except for the shares covered by
the over-allotment option described below, unless and until the
option is exercised.
The underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the
shares of common stock directly to the public at the public
offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus
supplement, and to dealers at the public offering price less a
selling concession not in excess of
$ per share. The underwriters also
may allow, and dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess
of $ per share to brokers and
dealers. After the offering, the underwriters may change the
offering price and other selling terms. Our common stock is
offered subject to receipt and acceptance thereof by the
underwriters and to the other conditions set forth in the
underwriting agreement, including the right to reject orders in
whole or in part. We and the underwriters will determine the
offering price of our common stock through negotiation. This
price will not necessarily reflect the price at which investors
in the market will be willing to buy and sell our shares
following this offering.
Over-Allotment
Option
We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to
360,000 additional shares of our common stock at the public
offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters
may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering
over-allotments, if any, made in connection with the offering of
the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus
supplement. The underwriters may exercise this option, in whole
or in part, at any time and from time to time for 30 days
from the date of the underwriting agreement. To the extent that
the underwriters exercise this option, the underwriters will be
committed, as long as the conditions of the underwriting
agreement are satisfied, to purchase the shares of common stock,
and we will be obligated to sell the shares of common stock to
the underwriters. If purchased, the additional shares will be
sold by the underwriters on the same terms as those on which the
other shares are sold. We will pay the expenses associated with
the exercise of this option.
Underwriting
Discount and Offering Expenses
The following table shows the per share and total public
offering price, underwriting discount to be paid to the
underwriters, and the net proceeds to us before expenses. This
information is presented assuming both no exercise and full
exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With Full
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount payable by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
S-68
We estimate that the expenses of this offering payable by us,
exclusive of the underwriting discount, will be approximately
$400,000.
Stabilizing
Transactions
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell our common stock in the open market. These transactions
may include over-allotment and stabilizing transactions,
syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids.
|
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriters of
shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are
obligated to purchase, which creates a syndicate short position.
The short position may be either a covered short position or a
naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of
shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the
number of shares that it may purchase under the over-allotment
option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved
is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment
option. The underwriters may close out any short position by
exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases of our
common stock made to prevent or retard a decline in the market
price of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of our common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If an underwriter sells more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option (i.e., a
naked short position), the position can only be closed out by
buying shares in the open market. A naked short position is more
likely to be created if an underwriter is concerned that there
could be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in
the open market after pricing that could adversely affect
investors who purchase shares in this offering.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling
concession from a selling group member when the common stock
originally sold by the member is purchased in a stabilizing or
syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short
positions.
|
These activities may stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
market price of our common stock, which may be greater than the
price that might otherwise prevail in the open market. These
activities, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. These
transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq, in the
over-the-counter
market or otherwise. Neither we nor the underwriters makes any
representation or prediction as to the effect that the
transactions described above may have on the market price of the
shares.
Discretionary
Accounts
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend to
confirm sales of shares of our common stock being offered to
accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority.
Lock-Up
Agreements
We and our executive officers and directors have agreed with the
underwriters that, during the period ending 90 days after
the date of this prospectus supplement, which we refer to as the
restricted period, none of us will, without the prior consent of
the underwriters, directly or indirectly, offer, sell or
otherwise dispose of any shares of common stock or any
securities which may be converted into or exchanged or exercised
for any such shares of common stock, or enter into any swap or
other arrangement that transfers to another person, in whole or
in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our
common stock. The restricted period is subject to a limited
extension in certain circumstances if shares of our common stock
are not actively traded securities, as defined in
Rule 101(c)(1) of Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
S-69
The foregoing restrictions do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale by us of shares of common stock to the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
the issuance by us of shares of common stock pursuant to, or the
grant of options under, our existing stock option plan or
outstanding warrants;
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares of common stock pursuant to existing
Rule 10b5-1
trading plans implemented by certain of our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares of common stock acquired in the public market
after the closing of this offering; or
|
|
|
|
transfers of shares of common stock or securities convertible
into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock by any of
the persons subject to a
lock-up
agreement (a) as bona fide gift or gifts, (b) by will
or intestacy or (c) to any affiliate or member of such
persons immediate family or a trust created for the direct
or indirect benefit of such person or the immediate family
thereof; provided that, in any such case the transferee or
transferees shall execute and deliver to the underwriters,
before such transfer, an agreement to be bound by the
restrictions on transfer described above.
|
In addition, during the restricted period, subject to certain
exceptions, we have also agreed not to file any registration
statement for the registration of any shares of common stock or
any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable
for common stock without the prior written consent of the
underwriters.
Indemnification
We will indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act. If we are unable
to provide this indemnification, we will contribute to payments
that the underwriters may be required to make in respect of
those liabilities.
Other
Relationships
In 2006, we engaged D.A. Davidson & Co. to provide
financial advisory services to us in connection with potential
financial and strategic opportunities, including acquisitions
and capital raising transactions. In accordance with this
engagement, we paid D.A. Davidson & Co. $1,000,000 in
connection with our acquisition of RLW.
In addition, the underwriters and their affiliates may in the
future provide various investment banking and other financial
advisory services for us and our affiliates, for which services
they may in the future receive customary fees. They underwriters
have advised us that, except as specifically contemplated in the
underwriting agreement, they owe no fiduciary or other duties to
us in connection with this offering, and they have agreements
and relationships with, and owes duties to, third parties,
including potential purchasers of the securities in this
offering, that may create actual, potential or apparent
conflicts of interest between the underwriters and us.
S-70
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered in this
prospectus will be passed upon for us by Andrews Kurth LLP,
Houston, Texas. The underwriters have been represented by Stoel
Rives LLP, Seattle, Washington.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Sterling Construction
Company, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008
either included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus and elsewhere in the
registration statement have been so included in reliance upon
the reports of Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public
accountants upon the authority of said firm as experts in giving
said reports.
The audited financial statements of Ralph L. Wadsworth
Construction Company, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
and for the three years in the period ended December 31,
2008, that have been included in this prospectus supplement have
been audited by Shelly & Company, independent auditor,
as indicated in its report with respect thereto, and are
included herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act
and file reports, proxy statements and other information with
the SEC. We have filed with the SEC a registration statement to
register the common stock offered by this prospectus supplement
and the accompanying prospectus. This prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus, which forms part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information
included in the registration statement. For further information
about us and the common stock offered in this prospectus
supplement, you should refer to the registration statement and
its exhibits. You may read and copy the registration statement
and any other document that we file with the SEC at the
SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room. In addition, the SEC maintains a web site that contains
registration statements, reports, proxy statements and other
information regarding registrants, such as us, that file
electronically with the SEC. The address of the web site is
www.sec.gov.
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the
information we file with the SEC, which means we can disclose
information to you by referring to those documents. The
information incorporated by reference is an important part of
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, and
information we file later with the SEC will automatically update
and take the place of this information. We are incorporating by
reference in this prospectus supplement the following documents
filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act (other than any
portions of the respective filings that were furnished pursuant
to Item 2.02 or 7.01 of Current Reports on
Form 8-K
or other applicable SEC rules):
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as amended;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the periods ended March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009
and September 30, 2009;
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
as filed with the SEC on August 10, 2009 and
December 3, 2009; and
|
|
|
|
The description of our common stock contained in our
registration statement on Form 8-A, filed on January 11,
2006, including any amendment or report updating the description.
|
Any statements made in a document incorporated by reference in
this prospectus supplement are deemed to be modified or
superseded for purposes of this prospectus supplement to the
extent that a statement in this prospectus supplement or in any
other subsequently filed document, which is also incorporated by
reference, modifies or supersedes the statement. Any statement
made in this prospectus supplement is deemed to be
S-71
modified or superseded to the extent a statement in any
subsequently filed document, which is incorporated by reference
in this prospectus supplement, modifies or supersedes such
statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be
deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a
part of this prospectus supplement.
The information relating to us contained in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus should be read
together with the information in the documents incorporated by
reference herein and therein. In addition, certain information,
including financial information, contained in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus or incorporated by
reference herein or therein should be read in conjunction with
documents we have filed with the SEC.
In addition, we incorporate by reference all documents we will
file with the SEC in the future under Sections 13, 14 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act until the termination of this
offering. We refer to these documents, and the documents listed
above, in this prospectus supplement as incorporated
documents.
You may request, without charge, a copy of any incorporated
document (excluding exhibits, unless we have specifically
incorporated an exhibit in an incorporated document) by writing
or telephoning us at our principal executive offices at the
following address:
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
Attention: Controller
20810 Fernbush Lane
Houston, Texas 77073
(281) 821-9091
S-72
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements of Sterling Construction
Company, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements of Sterling
Construction Company, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
F-27
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-28
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
F-29
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements of Ralph L. Wadsworth
Construction Company, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Auditors Report
|
|
|
F-39
|
|
Comparative Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
F-40
|
|
Comparative Statement of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-41
|
|
Comparative Statement of Retained Earnings for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-42
|
|
Comparative Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-43
|
|
Comparative Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Years
Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements of Ralph L. Wadsworth
Construction Company, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
F-52
|
|
Comparative Statement of Income for the Three and Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-53
|
|
Comparative Statement of Retained Earnings for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
Comparative Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
Comparative Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Three and
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors and Shareholders of
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 16,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion that Sterling Construction
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.
Houston, Texas
March 16, 2009, except as for the last paragraph of
Note 1 and for Note 18,
as to which the date is December 3, 2009.
F-2
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
We have audited Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (a Delaware
Corporation) and subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Sterling
Construction Company, Inc. and subsidiaries management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Sterling Construction Company Inc. and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Sterling Construction Company
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report
dated March 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those consolidated financial statements.
Houston, Texas
March 16, 2009
F-3
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
55,305
|
|
|
$
|
80,649
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Contracts receivable, including retainage
|
|
|
60,582
|
|
|
|
54,394
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
7,508
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
Deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
152,722
|
|
|
|
142,950
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
77,993
|
|
|
|
72,389
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
57,232
|
|
|
|
57,232
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
289,615
|
|
|
$
|
274,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
26,111
|
|
|
$
|
27,190
|
|
Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
|
|
23,127
|
|
|
|
25,349
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
7,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
57,599
|
|
|
|
60,887
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
55,483
|
|
|
|
65,556
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
11,117
|
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
Put liability related to and noncontrolling owners
interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
6,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,900
|
|
|
|
75,016
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized
1,000,000 shares, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized
19,000,000 shares, 13,184,638 and 13,006,502 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
150,223
|
|
|
|
147,786
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
8,762
|
|
|
|
(9,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sterling common stockholders equity
|
|
|
159,116
|
|
|
|
138,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
289,615
|
|
|
$
|
274,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-4
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
415,074
|
|
|
$
|
306,220
|
|
|
$
|
249,348
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
373,102
|
|
|
|
272,534
|
|
|
|
220,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41,972
|
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
|
|
28,547
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(13,763
|
)
|
|
|
(13,231
|
)
|
|
|
(10,825
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
28,128
|
|
|
|
21,004
|
|
|
|
17,998
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
|
|
22,396
|
|
|
|
19,204
|
|
Income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(1,087
|
)
|
|
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(8,938
|
)
|
|
|
(6,600
|
)
|
|
|
(6,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
(10,025
|
)
|
|
|
(7,890
|
)
|
|
|
(6,566
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
12,638
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on disposal
of $121 in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding in computing basic
per share amounts
|
|
|
13,119,987
|
|
|
|
11,043,948
|
|
|
|
10,582,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding in computing
diluted per share amounts
|
|
|
13,702,488
|
|
|
|
11,836,176
|
|
|
|
11,714,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-5
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
8,165
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
82,822
|
|
|
$
|
(34,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,611
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
Stock issued in equity offering, net of expenses
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
27,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,039
|
|
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
(2,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
10,875
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
114,630
|
|
|
|
(23,748
|
)
|
|
|
90,991
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
14,444
|
|
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
Stock issued in equity offering, net of expenses
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
34,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,489
|
|
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Issuance of stock to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Excess fair value over book value of noncontrolling interest in
RHB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,007
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
147,786
|
|
|
|
(9,304
|
)
|
|
|
138,612
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,066
|
|
|
|
18,066
|
|
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
Revaluation of noncontrolling interest put liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
Expenditures related to 2007 equity offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
13,185
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
150,223
|
|
|
$
|
8,762
|
|
|
$
|
159,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated
financial statement
F-6
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in earnings
of subsidiary
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
14,506
|
|
|
|
12,638
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to
net cash provided by continuing operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
7,011
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
8,938
|
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(1,218
|
)
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense accreted on noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in contracts receivable
|
|
|
(6,188
|
)
|
|
|
(6,588
|
)
|
|
|
(7,893
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(3,761
|
)
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(1,945
|
)
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in trade payables
|
|
|
(1,079
|
)
|
|
|
6,064
|
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(2,222
|
)
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
7,901
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued compensation and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations operating activities
|
|
|
26,721
|
|
|
|
29,542
|
|
|
|
23,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing operations investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for business combinations, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,334
|
)
|
|
|
(2,206
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(19,896
|
)
|
|
|
(26,319
|
)
|
|
|
(24,849
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
Purchases of short-term securities, available for sale
|
|
|
(24,325
|
)
|
|
|
(123,797
|
)
|
|
|
(144,192
|
)
|
Sales of short-term securities, available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,912
|
|
|
|
118,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations investing activities
|
|
|
(42,923
|
)
|
|
|
(47,935
|
)
|
|
|
(52,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing operations financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative daily drawdowns Credit Facility
|
|
|
235,000
|
|
|
|
190,199
|
|
|
|
106,025
|
|
Cumulative daily reductions Credit Facility
|
|
|
(245,000
|
)
|
|
|
(155,199
|
)
|
|
|
(89,813
|
)
|
Repayments under related party long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,449
|
)
|
Repayments under long-term obligations
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Increase in deferred loan costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,197
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock pursuant to warrants and options
exercised
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
Utilization of excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to RHB minority interest owner
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on note receivable
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
34,489
|
|
|
|
27,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations financing
activities
|
|
|
(9,142
|
)
|
|
|
70,576
|
|
|
|
35,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(25,344
|
)
|
|
|
52,183
|
|
|
|
6,199
|
|
Cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Cash used in discontinued investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
Cash used in discontinued operations financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
80,649
|
|
|
|
28,466
|
|
|
|
22,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
55,305
|
|
|
$
|
80,649
|
|
|
$
|
28,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of $107, $53 and
$14 of capitalized interest expense in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
F-7
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation:
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (Sterling or
the Company) a Delaware Corporation, is a leading
heavy civil construction company that specializes in the
building, reconstruction and repair of transportation and water
infrastructure in large and growing markets in Texas and Nevada.
Our transportation infrastructure projects include highways,
roads, bridges and light rail, and our water infrastructure
projects include water, wastewater and storm drainage systems.
We provide general contracting services primarily to public
sector clients utilizing our own employees and equipment for
activities including excavating, paving, pipe installation and
concrete and asphalt placement. We purchase the necessary
materials for our contracts, perform approximately
three-quarters of the work required by our contracts with our
own crews, and generally engage subcontractors only for
ancillary services.
Sterling owns four subsidiaries; Texas Sterling Construction Co.
(TSC), a Delaware corporation, Road and Highway
Builders, LLC (RHB), a Nevada limited liability
company, Road and Highway Builders, Inc. (RHB Inc),
a Nevada corporation and Road and Highway Builders of
California, Inc., (RHB Cal). TSC, RHB and RHB Cal
perform construction contracts and RHB Inc produces aggregates
from a leased quarry.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of subsidiaries in which the Company has a greater than
50% ownership interest and all significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For all
years presented, the Company had no subsidiaries with ownership
interests of less than 50%.
Organization
and Business:
Although we describe our business in this report in terms of the
services we provide, our base of customers and the geographic
areas in which we operate, we have concluded that our operations
comprise one reportable segment pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 131
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. In making this determination, we considered that
each project has similar characteristics, includes similar
services, has similar types of customers and is subject to
similar economic and regulatory environments. We organize,
evaluate and manage our financial information around each
project when making operating decisions and assessing our
overall performance.
Use of
Estimates:
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, which require management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain of the Companys accounting policies require higher
degrees of judgment than others in their application. These
include the recognition of revenue and earnings from
construction contracts under the percentage of completion
method, the valuation of long-term assets, and income taxes.
Management evaluates all of its estimates and judgments on an
on-going basis.
Revenue
Recognition:
Construction
The Companys primary business since July 2001 has been as
a general contractor in the States of Texas and, with the
acquisition of RHB, Nevada where it engages in various types of
heavy civil construction projects principally for public
(government) owners. Credit risk is minimal with public owners
since the
F-8
Company ascertains that funds have been appropriated by the
governmental project owner prior to commencing work on such
projects. While most public contracts are subject to termination
at the election of the government entity, in the event of
termination the Company is entitled to receive the contract
price for completed work and reimbursement of
termination-related costs. Credit risk with private owners is
minimized because of statutory mechanics liens, which give the
Company high priority in the event of lien foreclosures
following financial difficulties of private owners.
Revenues are recognized on the
percentage-of-completion
method, measured by the ratio of costs incurred up to a given
date to estimated total costs for each contract.
Contract costs include all direct material, labor, subcontract
and other costs and those indirect costs related to contract
performance, such as indirect salaries and wages, equipment
repairs and depreciation, insurance and payroll taxes.
Administrative and general expenses are charged to expense as
incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted
contracts are made in the period in which such losses are
determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and
estimated profitability, including those changes arising from
contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements may
result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in
the period in which the revisions are determined. An amount
attributable to contract claims is included in revenues when
realization is probable and the amount can be reliably
estimated. Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings
included $0.2 million and $0.5 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for contract
claims not approved by the customer (which includes
out-of-scope
work, potential or actual disputes, and claims). The Company
generally provides a one-year warranty for workmanship under its
contracts. Warranty claims historically have been insignificant.
The asset, Costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts represents revenues
recognized in excess of amounts billed on these contracts. The
liability Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts represents billings in
excess of revenues recognized on these contracts.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original or remaining maturities of three months or less at the
time of purchase to be cash equivalents. At December 31,
2008, all cash and cash equivalents were fully insured by the
FDIC under its Transaction Account Guarantee Program. At
December 31, 2008 there were uninsured short-term
investments of $13.1 million.
The Company classified investments in U.S. treasury bills
of $5.0 million at December 31, 2008, as securities
available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. At December 31, 2008 we had certificates
of deposits of $19.4 million with original maturities of
greater than 90 days, but less than one year which were
included along with the treasury bills in short-term
investments. There was no material unrealized gain or loss on
these securities at December 31, 2008, as the market value
of these securities approximated their cost.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the
Company recorded interest income of $1.1 million,
$1.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Contracts
Receivable:
Contracts receivable are generally based on amounts billed to
the customer. At December 31, 2008, contracts receivable
included retainage of $25.9 million discussed below which
is being withheld by customers until completion of the contracts
and $2.1 million of unbilled receivables on contracts
completed or substantially complete at that date (the latter
amount is expected to be billed in 2009). All other contracts
receivable include only balances approved for payment by the
customer. Based upon a review of outstanding contracts
receivable, historical collection information and existing
economic conditions, management has determined that all
contracts receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are
fully collectible, and accordingly, no allowance for doubtful
accounts against contracts receivable is necessary. Contracts
receivable are written
F-9
off based on individual credit evaluation and specific
circumstances of the customer, when such treatment is warranted.
Retainage:
Many of the contracts under which the Company performs work
contain retainage provisions. Retainage refers to that portion
of billings made by the Company but held for payment by the
customer pending satisfactory completion of the project. Unless
reserved, the Company assumes that all amounts retained by
customers under such provisions are fully collectible. Retainage
on active contracts is classified as a current asset regardless
of the term of the contract and is generally collected within
one year of the completion of a contract. Retainage was
approximately $25.9 million and $21.1 million at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively,
of which $0.2 million at December 31, 2008 is expected
to be collected beyond 2009.
Inventories:
The Companys inventories are stated at the lower of cost
or market as determined by the average cost method. Inventories
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 consist primarily of raw
materials, such as concrete and millings which are expected to
be utilized on construction projects in the future. The cost of
inventory includes labor, trucking and other equipment costs.
Property
and Equipment:
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and
amortization are computed using the straight-line method. The
estimated useful lives used for computing depreciation and
amortization are as follows:
|
|
|
Building
|
|
39 years
|
Construction equipment
|
|
5-15 years
|
Land improvements
|
|
5-15 years
|
Office furniture and fixtures
|
|
3-10 years
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
5 years
|
Depreciation expense was approximately $12.9 million,
$9.5 million, and $6.9 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Equipment
under Capital Leases:
The Companys policy is to account for capital leases,
which transfer substantially all the benefits and risks incident
to the ownership of the leased property to the Company, as the
acquisition of an asset and the incurrence of an obligation.
Under this method of accounting, the recorded value of the
leased asset is amortized principally using the straight-line
method over its estimated useful life and the obligation,
including interest thereon, is reduced through payments over the
life of the lease. Depreciation expense on leased equipment and
the related accumulated depreciation is included with that of
owned equipment.
Deferred
Loan Costs:
Deferred loan costs represent loan origination fees paid to the
lender and related professional fees such as legal fees related
to drafting of loan agreements. These fees are amortized over
the term of the loan. In 2007, the Company entered into a new
syndicated term Credit Facility (see Note 4) and
incurred $1.3 million of loan costs, which are being
amortized over the five-year term of the loan. In 2006, TSC
renewed its line of credit and incurred loan costs in the amount
of $123,000, which were being amortized over the three year term
of the Credit Facility; however, the unamortized loan costs were
charged to expense in 2007 with the execution of a new line of
credit. Loan cost amortization expense for fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006 was $254,000, $76,000 and $99,000, respectively.
F-10
Goodwill
and Intangibles:
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of companies acquired
over the fair value of their net assets at the dates of
acquisition.
The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142
requires that: (1) goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets not be amortized, (2) goodwill is to be tested for
impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level,
(3) the amortization period of intangible assets with
finite lives is to be no longer limited to forty years, and
(4) intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life are
to be tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the
fair value of these assets with their recorded amounts.
Goodwill impairment is tested during the last quarter of each
calendar year. The first step compares the book value of the
Companys stock to the fair market value of those shares as
reported by Nasdaq. If the fair market value of the stock is
greater than the calculated book value of the stock, goodwill is
deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is required. If
the fair market value is less than the calculated book value,
additional steps of determining fair value of additional assets
must be taken to determine impairment. Testing step one in 2008
indicated the fair market value of the Companys stock was
in excess of its book value and no further testing was required;
based on the results of such test for impairment, the Company
concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed as of
December 31, 2008.
Intangible assets that have finite lives continue to be subject
to amortization. In addition, the Company must evaluate the
remaining useful life in each reporting period to determine
whether events and circumstances warrant a revision of the
remaining period of amortization. If the estimate of an
intangible assets remaining life is changed, the remaining
carrying amount of such asset is amortized prospectively over
that revised remaining useful life.
Evaluating
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
When events or changes in circumstances indicate that long-lived
assets other than goodwill may be impaired, an evaluation is
performed. The estimated undiscounted cash flow associated with
the asset is compared to the assets carrying amount to
determine if a write-down to fair value is required.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
We determine deferred income tax assets and liabilities using
the balance sheet method, as clarified by FIN 48. Under
this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is
determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences
between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet
assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes
in tax rates and laws. Valuation allowances are established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized. FIN 48 requires that we recognize the
financial statement benefit of a tax position only after
determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely
than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax
positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount
recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit
that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax
authority (see Note 6).
Stock-Based
Compensation:
The Company has five stock-based incentive plans which are
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. Prior to August 2006, the Company used the closing
price of its common stock on the trading day immediately
preceding the date the option was approved as the grant date
market value. Since July 2006, the Companys policy has
been to use the closing price of the common stock on the date of
the meeting at which a stock option award is approved for the
options per-share exercise price. The term of the grants
under the plans do not exceed 10 years. Stock options
generally vest over a three to five year period and the fair
value of the stock option is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period of the option. Refer to Note 8 for
further information regarding the stock-based incentive plans.
F-11
Net
Income Per Share:
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common
share is the same as basic net income per share but assumes the
exercise of any convertible subordinated debt securities and
includes dilutive stock options and warrants using the treasury
stock method. The following table reconciles the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted per common share
computations for net income for 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
13,120
|
|
|
|
11,044
|
|
|
|
10,583
|
|
Shares for dilutive stock options and warrants
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed
conversions diluted
|
|
|
13,702
|
|
|
|
11,836
|
|
|
|
11,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, there
were 96,007, 79,700 and 81,500 options, respectively, considered
antidilutive as the option exercise price exceeded the average
share market price.
Interest
Costs
Approximately $107,000, $53,000 and $14,000 of interest related
to the construction of maintenance facilities and an office
building were capitalized as part of construction costs during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, in accordance with
SFAS No. 34 Capitalization of Interest
Cost.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). This Statement establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer: (a) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase and (c) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
Also, under SFAS 141(R), all direct costs of the business
combination must be charged to expense on the financial
statements of the acquirer as incurred. SFAS 141(R) revises
previous guidance as to the recording of post-combination
restructuring plan costs by requiring the acquirer to record
such costs separately from the business combination. This
statement is effective for acquisitions occurring on or after
January 1, 2009, with early adoption not permitted. Unless
the Company enters into another business combination, there will
be no effect on future financial statements of SFAS 141(R)
when adopted.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) which establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded
disclosure about the information used to measure fair value. The
statement applies whenever other statements require or permit
assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not
expand the use of fair value accounting in any new
circumstances. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective
date by which companies must adopt the provisions of
SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except
for items that are recognized or disclosed in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The new
effective date of SFAS 157 deferred implementation to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
F-12
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment to FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). This
statement allows a company to irrevocably elect fair value as a
measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial
liabilities with changes in fair value recognized in the results
of operations. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between companies that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. Adoption of this FASB did not have
a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 160, Non-controlling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 clarifies previous guidance on
how consolidated entities should account for and report
non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. The
statement standardizes the presentation of non-controlling
(minority interests) for both the consolidated
balance sheet and income statement. This Statement is effective
for the Company for fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2009, and all interim periods within that fiscal
year, with early adoption not permitted. Upon adoption, the
non-controlling interest in any subsequent acquisition that does
not contain a put will be reported as a separate component of
stockholders equity instead of a liability and net income
will be segregated between net income attributable to common
stockholders and non-controlling interests.
Reclassifications
Certain balances included in the prior year balance sheet have
been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. The
accompanying financial statements also contain certain
reclassifications to conform with the requirements of
SFAS 160 discussed above.
|
|
2.
|
Discontinued
operations
|
In 2005 management identified one of the Companys
subsidiaries, Steel City Products, LLC, (SCPL) as
held for sale and accordingly, reclassified its consolidated
financial statements for all periods to separately present SCPL
as discontinued operations.
On October 27, 2006, the Company sold the operations of
SCPL to an industry related buyer. The Company received proceeds
from the sale of $5.4 million. The Company reported a
pre-tax gain of $249,000 on the sale, equal to $121,000 after
taxes. Summarized financial information for discontinued
operations through the date of the sale on October 27, 2006
is presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
17,661
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
741
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
180
|
|
Gain on disposal, net of tax of $128
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
|
|
3.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
$
|
96,002
|
|
|
$
|
83,739
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
12,358
|
|
|
|
9,279
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
Water rights
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,741
|
|
|
|
98,967
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(38,748
|
)
|
|
|
(26,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
77,993
|
|
|
$
|
72,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 construction in progress consisted of
expenditures for new maintenance shop facilities at various
locations in Texas.
|
|
4.
|
Line of
Credit and Long-Term Debt
|
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Credit Facility, due October 2012
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
Mortgages due monthly through June 2016
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
65,654
|
|
Less current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,483
|
|
|
$
|
65,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line
of Credit Facilities
On October 31, 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries
entered into a new credit facility (Credit Facility)
with Comerica Bank, which replaced a prior Revolver and will
mature on October 31, 2012. The Credit Facility allows for
borrowing of up to $75.0 million and is secured by all
assets of the Company, other than proceeds and other rights
under our construction contracts, which are pledged to our bond
surety. The Credit Facility requires the payment of a quarterly
commitment fee of 0.25% per annum of the unused portion of the
Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Credit Facility were used
to finance the RHB acquisition, repay indebtedness outstanding
under the Revolver, and finance working capital. At
December 31, 2008, the aggregate borrowings outstanding
under the Credit Facility were $55.0 million, and the
aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding under the
Credit Facility was $1.8 million, which reduces
availability under the Credit Facility. Availability under the
Credit Facility was, therefore, $18.2 million at
December 31, 2008.
At our election, the loans under the Credit Facility bear
interest at either a LIBOR-based interest rate or a prime-based
interest rate. The unpaid principal balance of each prime-based
loan will bear interest at a variable rate equal to
Comericas prime rate plus an amount ranging from 0% to
0.50% depending on the pricing leverage ratio that we achieve.
The pricing leverage ratio is determined by the
ratio of our average total debt, less cash and cash equivalents,
to the EBITDA that we achieve on a rolling four-quarter basis.
The pricing leverage ratio is measured quarterly. If we achieve
a pricing leverage ratio of (a) less than 1.00 to 1.00;
(b) equal to or greater than 1.00 to 1.00 but less than
1.75 to 1.00; or (c) greater than or equal to 1.75 to 1.00,
then the applicable prime margins will be 0.0%, 0.25% or 0.50%,
respectively. The interest rate on funds
F-14
borrowed under this Credit Facility was 3.5% at
December 31, 2008, and during the year ended
December 31, 2008 ranged from 3.50% to 7.50%.
The unpaid principal balance of each LIBOR-based loan bears
interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus an amount
ranging from 1.25% to 2.25% depending on the pricing leverage
ratio that we achieve. If we achieve a pricing leverage ratio of
(a) less than 1.00 to 1.00; (b) equal to or greater
than 1.00 to 1.00 but less than 1.75 to 1.00; or
(c) greater than or equal to 1.75 to 1.00, then the
applicable LIBOR margins will be 1.25%, 1.75% or 2.25%,
respectively. Interest on LIBOR-based loans is payable at the
end of the relevant LIBOR interest period, which must be one,
two, three or six months.
The Credit Facility is subject to our compliance with certain
covenants, including financial covenants relating to fixed
charges, leverage, tangible net worth, asset coverage and
consolidated net losses. The Credit Facility contains
restrictions on the Companys ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
Make distributions and dividends;
|
|
|
|
Incur liens and encumbrances;
|
|
|
|
Incur further indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Guarantee obligations;
|
|
|
|
Dispose of a material portion of assets or merge with a third
party;
|
|
|
|
Make acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Incur negative income for two consecutive quarters.
|
The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the
Credit Facility as of December 31, 2008.
In December 2007, Comerica syndicated the Credit Facility with
three other financial institutions under the same terms
discussed above.
Management believes that the Credit Facility will provide
adequate funding for the Companys working capital, debt
service and capital expenditure requirements, including seasonal
fluctuations at least through December 31, 2009.
The prior Revolver required the payment of a quarterly
commitment fee of 0.25% per annum of the unused portion of the
line of credit. Borrowing interest rates were based on the
banks prime rate or on a Eurodollar rate at the option of
the Company. The interest rate on funds borrowed under this
revolver during the year ended December 31, 2006 ranged
from 7.25% to 8.25% and during 2007 ranged from 7.75% to 8.25%.
Mortgage
In 2001 TSC completed the construction of a headquarters
building and financed it principally through a mortgage of
$1.1 million on the land and facilities, at a floating
interest rate, which at December 31, 2008 was 3.5% per
annum, repayable over 15 years. The aggregate outstanding
balance on these two mortgages aggregated $556,000 at
December 31, 2008.
Maturity
of Debt
The Companys long-term obligations mature in future years
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
2010
|
|
|
73
|
|
2011
|
|
|
73
|
|
2012
|
|
|
55,073
|
|
2013
|
|
|
73
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments defines the fair value of
financial instruments as the amount at which the instrument
could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing
parties.
The Companys financial instruments are cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, contracts receivable,
accounts payable, mortgages payable and long-term debt. The
recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, contracts receivable and accounts payable
approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.
The recorded value of long-term debt approximates its fair
value, as interest approximates market rates.
TSC had one mortgage outstanding at December 31, 2008, and
two mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2007. The
mortgage outstanding at December 31, 2008 was accruing
interest at 3.50% at that date and contained pre-payment
penalties. To determine the fair value of the mortgage, the
amount of future cash flows was discounted using the
Companys borrowing rate on its Credit Facility. At
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the carrying
value of the mortgages was $556,000 and $654,000, respectively,
and the fair value of the mortgages was approximately $488,000
and $641,000, respectively.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financial
instruments.
|
|
6.
|
Income
Taxes and Deferred Tax Asset/Liability
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, Sterling utilized
its book net operating tax loss carry-forwards (NOL)
of approximately $9.8 million to offset a portion of the
taxable income of the Company and its subsidiaries for federal
income tax return purposes.
The Company also had available carry-forwards resulting from the
exercise of non-qualified stock options. The Company could not
recognize the tax benefit of these carry-forwards as deferred
tax assets until its existing NOLs were fully utilized,
and therefore, the deferred tax asset related to NOL
carry-forwards differed from the amount available on its federal
tax returns. The Company utilized approximately
$3.5 million and $4.2 million of these excess
compensation carry-forwards from the exercise of stock options
to offset taxable income in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
utilization of these excess compensation benefits for tax
purposes reduced taxes payable and increased additional paid-in
capital for financial statement purposes by $1.2 million
and $1.5 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Current income tax expense represents federal tax payable for
2008 and Texas franchise tax.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities of continuing operations
consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long Term
|
|
|
Assets related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
1,169
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,054
|
|
|
$
|
487
|
|
AMT carry forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,031
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset/liability
|
|
$
|
1,203
|
|
|
$
|
(11,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,088
|
|
|
$
|
(3,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
The income tax provision differs from the amount using the
statutory federal income tax rate of 35% in 2008 and 2007 and
34% in 2006 applied to income from continuing operations, for
the following reasons (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
10,149
|
|
|
$
|
7,838
|
|
|
$
|
6,721
|
|
Texas franchise tax expense, net of refunds and federal benefits
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes on subsidiarys earnings allocated to minority
interest
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-taxable interest income
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
10,025
|
|
|
$
|
7,890
|
|
|
$
|
6,874
|
|
Income tax on discontinued operations including taxes on the
gain on sale in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax on continuing operations
|
|
$
|
10,025
|
|
|
$
|
7,890
|
|
|
$
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the effective income tax rate to 34.6% in 2008
from 35.2% in 2007 is due to the increase in the portion of
earnings of a subsidiary taxed to the minority interest owner
partially offset by a full year of the revised Texas franchise
tax which became effective July 1, 2007. The increase in
the effective income tax rate to 35.2% in 2007 from 34.2% in
2006 is the result of the Texas franchise tax and an increase in
the statutory tax rate.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the
United States federal jurisdiction and in various states. With
few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal tax
examinations for years prior to 2002 and state income tax
examinations for years prior to 2005. The Companys policy
is to recognize interest related to any underpayment of taxes as
interest expense, and penalties as administrative expenses. No
interest or penalties have been accrued at December 31,
2008.
The Company adopted FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes on January 1, 2007;
however the adoption did not result in an adjustment to retained
earnings. In its 2005 tax return, the Company used NOLs
that would have expired during that year instead of deducting
compensation expense that originated in 2005 as the result of
stock option exercises. Therefore, that compensation deduction
was lost. Whether the Company can choose not to take deductions
for compensation expense in the tax return and to instead use
otherwise expiring NOLs is considered by management to be an
uncertain tax position. In the event that the IRS examines the
2005 tax return and determines that the compensation expense is
a required deduction in the tax return, then the Company would
deduct the compensation expense instead of the NOL used in the
period; however there would be no cash impact on tax paid due to
the increased compensation deduction. In addition, there would
be no interest or penalties due as a result of the change. As a
result of the Companys detailed FIN 48 analysis,
management has determined that it is more likely than not this
position will be sustained upon examination, and this uncertain
tax position was determined to have a measurement of $0.
The Company does not believe that its uncertain tax position
will significantly change due to the settlement and expiration
of statutes of limitations prior to December 31, 2009.
F-17
|
|
7.
|
Costs and
Estimated Earnings and Billings on Uncompleted
Contracts
|
Costs and estimated earnings and billings on uncompleted
contracts at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
$
|
584,997
|
|
|
$
|
329,559
|
|
Billings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(600,616
|
)
|
|
|
(351,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in accompanying balance sheets under the following
captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
$
|
7,508
|
|
|
$
|
3,747
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(23,127
|
)
|
|
|
(25,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Stock
Options and Warrants
|
Stock
Options and Grants
In July 2001, the Board of Directors adopted and in October
2001 shareholders approved the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
(the 2001 Plan). The 2001 Plan initially provided
for the issuance of stock awards for up to 500,000 shares
of the Companys common stock. In March 2006, the number of
shares available for issuance under the 2001 Plan was increased
to one million shares. In November 2007, the number of shares
available for issuance under the 2001 Plan was reduced by the
board of directors from one million shares to
662,626 shares and subsequently in May 2008 was returned to
one million shares. The plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. In general, the plan
provides for all grants to be issued with a per-share exercise
price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock
on the date of grant. The original terms of the grants typically
do not exceed 10 years. Stock options generally vest over a
three to five year period.
The Companys and its subsidiaries directors,
officers, employees, consultants and advisors are eligible to be
granted awards under the 2001 plan.
At December 31, 2008 there were 397,690 shares of
common stock available under the 2001 Plan for issuance pursuant
to future stock option and share grants. No options are
outstanding and no shares are or will be available for grant
under the Companys other option plans, all of which have
been terminated.
The 2001 plan provides for restricted stock grants and in May
2008 and May 2007, pursuant to non-employee director
compensation arrangements. Non-employee directors of the Company
were awarded restricted stock with one-year vesting as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Awards
|
|
2007 Awards
|
|
Shares awarded to each non-employee directors
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
Total shares awarded
|
|
|
17,948
|
|
|
|
9,588
|
|
Grant-date market price per share of awarded shares
|
|
$
|
19.50
|
|
|
$
|
21.90
|
|
Total compensation cost
|
|
$
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
Compensation cost recognized in 2008
|
|
$
|
221,000
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
F-18
In March 2008, five employees were granted an aggregate of
5,672 shares of restricted stock with a market value $18.16
per share resulting in compensation expense of $103,000 to be
recognized ratably over the five-year restriction period.
The following tables summarize the stock option activity under
the 2001 Plan and previously active plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 Non-Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Plan
|
|
|
Director Plan
|
|
|
1991 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
457,160
|
|
|
$
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
31,166
|
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
84,420
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
81,500
|
|
|
$
|
16.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(64,057
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
(55,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
Expired/forfeited
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
470,203
|
|
|
$
|
8.35
|
|
|
|
13,166
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
28,424
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
16,507
|
|
|
$
|
19.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(24,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
(28,424
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
Expired/forfeited
|
|
|
(5,460
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
457,140
|
|
|
$
|
9.06
|
|
|
|
10,166
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(45,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
(10,166
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/forfeited
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
25.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
411,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 Omnibus Plan
|
|
|
1998 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
424,196
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
229,125
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(166,016
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
(225,875
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
258,180
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(181,990
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
(3,250
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
76,190
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(76,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Number of
|
|
Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
Number of
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
per Share
|
|
Shares
|
|
(Years)
|
|
Share
|
|
Shares
|
|
Share
|
|
$0.94 - $1.50
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
31,700
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
$1.73 - $2.00
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
$2.75 - $3.38
|
|
|
148,193
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
135,533
|
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
$6.87
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
$
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.87
|
|
$9.69
|
|
|
62,800
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
|
|
62,800
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
$16.78
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
16.78
|
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
$
|
16.78
|
|
$18.99
|
|
|
13,707
|
|
|
|
8.61
|
|
|
$
|
18.99
|
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
18.99
|
|
$21.60
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
$24.96
|
|
|
62,800
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
$
|
24.96
|
|
|
|
62,800
|
|
|
$
|
24.96
|
|
$25.21
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
25.21
|
|
|
|
6,920
|
|
|
$
|
25.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,000
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
$
|
9.75
|
|
|
|
369,022
|
|
|
$
|
9.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
Total outstanding
in-the-money
options at 12/31/08
|
|
|
314,993
|
|
|
$
|
4,137,416
|
|
Total vested
in-the-money
options at 12/31/08
|
|
|
291,933
|
|
|
$
|
3,923,872
|
|
Total options exercised during 2008
|
|
|
132,296
|
|
|
$
|
2,184,482
|
|
For unexercised options, aggregate intrinsic value represents
the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on December 31, 2008
($18.53) and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
option shares) that would have been received by the option
holders had all option holders exercised their options on
December 31, 2008. For options exercised during 2008,
aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax intrinsic
value based on the Companys closing stock price on the day
of exercise.
Compensation expense for options granted during 2007 and 2006
were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
using the following assumptions in each year (no options were
granted during 2008):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
Average Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Average Expected volatility
|
|
|
70.7
|
%
|
|
|
76.3
|
%
|
Average Expected life of option
|
|
|
3.0 years
|
|
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is based upon interest rates that
match the contractual terms of the stock option grants. The
expected volatility is based on historical observation and
recent price fluctuations. The expected life is based on
evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise
behavior, which is not less than the vesting period of the
options. The Company does not currently pay dividends. The
weighted average fair value of stock options granted in 2007 and
2006 was $12.20 and $16.36, respectively.
Pre-tax deferred compensation expense for stock options and
restricted stock grants was $517,000 ($336,000 after tax effects
of 35.0%), $1,110,000 ($722,000 after tax effects of 35.0%), and
$1,108,000 ($729,000 after tax effects of 34.2%), in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Proceeds received by the Company from
the exercise of options in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $205,000,
$513,000 and $657,000, respectively. At December 31, 2008,
total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
unvested stock options was approximately $336,000, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2.0 years.
F-20
Warrants
Warrants attached to zero coupon notes were issued to certain
members of TSC management and to certain stockholders in 2001.
These ten-year warrants to purchase shares of the Companys
common stock at $1.50 per share became exercisable
54 months from the July 2001 issue date, except that one
warrant covering 322,661 shares by amendment became
exercisable forty-two months from the issue date. The following
table shows the warrant shares outstanding and the proceeds that
have been received by the Company from exercises.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds of
|
|
Warrant Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Balance
|
|
Warrants outstanding on vest date
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Warrants exercised in 2005
|
|
|
322,661
|
|
|
$
|
483,991
|
|
|
|
527,339
|
|
Warrants exercised in 2006
|
|
|
171,073
|
|
|
$
|
256,610
|
|
|
|
356,266
|
|
Warrants exercised in 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,266
|
|
Warrants exercised in 2008
|
|
|
22,220
|
|
|
$
|
33,330
|
|
|
|
334,046
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain a defined contribution
profit-sharing plan covering substantially all non-union persons
employed by the Company and its subsidiaries, whereby employees
may contribute a percentage of compensation, limited to maximum
allowed amounts under the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan
provides for discretionary employer contributions, the level of
which, if any, may vary by subsidiary and is determined annually
by each companys board of directors. The Company made
aggregate matching contributions of $322,000, $353,000 and
$325,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
The Company leases office space in the Dallas and
San Antonio areas of Texas and Reno, Nevada.
In 2006 and 2007, the Company entered into several long-term
operating leases for equipment with lease terms of approximately
three to five years. Certain of these leases allow the Company
to purchase the equipment on or before the end of the lease
term. If the Company does not purchase the equipment, it is
returned to the lessor. Two leases obligate the Company to pay a
guaranteed residual not to exceed 20% of the original equipment
cost. The Company is accruing the liability for both leases,
which is not expected to exceed $330,000 in the aggregate.
Minimum annual rentals for all operating leases having initial
non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
2010
|
|
|
721
|
|
2011
|
|
|
634
|
|
2012
|
|
|
70
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum rental payments
|
|
$
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense for all operating leases amounted to
approximately $767,000, $1,068,000 and $995,000 in fiscal years
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
F-21
The following table shows contract revenues generated from the
Companys customers that accounted for more than 10% of
revenues (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
% of
|
|
Contract
|
|
% of
|
|
Contract
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT)
|
|
$
|
162,041
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
201,073
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
166,333
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT)
|
|
$
|
88,159
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
City of Houston (COH)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
29,848
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
Harris County
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
represents less than 10% of revenues |
At December 31, 2008, TXDOT ($22.1 million), City of
Houston ($10.2 million) and City of San Antonio
($7.5 million) owed balances greater than 10% of contracts
receivable.
In December 2007, the Company completed a public offering of
1.84 million shares of its common stock at $20.00 per
share. The Company received proceeds, net of underwriting
discounts and commissions, of approximately $35.0 million
($19.00 per share) and paid approximately $0.5 million in
related offering expenses. From the proceeds of the offering,
the Company repaid the portion of its Credit Facility that was
used in its acquisition of its interest in RHB. The remainder of
the offering proceeds was used for working capital purposes.
In January 2006, the Company completed a public offering of
approximately 2.0 million shares of its common stock at
$15.00 per share. The Company received proceeds, net of
underwriting commissions, of approximately $28.0 million
($13.95 per share) and paid approximately $907,000 in related
offering expenses. In addition, the Company received
approximately $484,000 in December 2005 from the exercise of
warrants and options to purchase 321,758 shares of Common
Stock, which were subsequently sold in 2006 by the option and
warrant holders in the offering. From the proceeds of the
offering, the Company repaid all its outstanding related party
promissory notes to officers, directors and former directors as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
Principal
|
|
Interest
|
|
Payment
|
|
Patrick T. Manning
|
|
$
|
318,592
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
$
|
321,459
|
|
James D. Manning
|
|
$
|
1,855,349
|
|
|
|
16,698
|
|
|
$
|
1,872,047
|
|
Joseph P. Harper, Sr.
|
|
$
|
2,637,422
|
|
|
|
23,737
|
|
|
$
|
2,661,159
|
|
Maarten D. Hemsley
|
|
$
|
181,205
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
$
|
182,836
|
|
Robert M. Davies
|
|
$
|
452,909
|
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
$
|
456,985
|
|
During 2006, the Company utilized a portion of the offering
proceeds to purchase additional construction equipment and to
repay borrowed funds.
|
|
13.
|
Minority
interest in RHB:
|
On October 31, 2007, the Company purchased a 91.67%
interest in Road and Highway Builders, LLC (RHB), a
Nevada limited liability company, and all of the outstanding
capital stock of Road and Highway Builders, Inc (RHB
Inc), then an inactive Nevada corporation. These entities
were affiliated through common ownership and have been included
in the Companys consolidated results since the date of
acquisition.
F-22
RHB is a heavy civil construction business located in Reno,
Nevada that builds roads, highways and bridges for local and
state agencies in Nevada. Its assets consist of construction
contracts, road and bridge construction and aggregate mining
machinery and equipment, and approximately 44.5 acres of
land with improvements. RHB Incs sole asset is its right
as a co-lessee with RHB under a long-term, royalty-based lease
of a Nevada quarry on which RHB can mine aggregates for use in
its own construction business and for sale to third parties.
During early 2008, RHB Inc began crushing stone for the
operations of RHB.
The Company paid an aggregate purchase price for its interest in
RHB of $53.0 million, consisting of $48.9 million in
cash, 40,702 unregistered shares of the Companys common
stock, which were valued at $1.0 million based on the
quoted market value of the Companys stock on the purchase
date, and $3.1 million in assumption of accounts payable to
RHB by one of the sellers. Additionally, the Company incurred
$1.1 million of direct costs related to the acquisition. We
acquired RHB for a number of reasons, including those listed
below:
a) Expansion into growing western U.S. infrastructure
construction markets;
b) Strong management team with a shared corporate culture;
c) Expansion of our service lines into aggregates and
asphalt paving materials;
d) Opportunities to extend our municipal and structural
capabilities into Nevada; and
e) RHBs strong financial results and expected
immediate accretion to our earnings and earnings per share.
Ten percent of the cash purchase price was placed in escrow for
eighteen months as security for any breach of representations
and warranties made by the sellers.
The minority interest owner of RHB (who remains with RHB as
Chief Executive Officer) has the right to require the Company to
buy his remaining 8.33% minority interest in RHB and,
concurrently, the Company has the right to require that owner to
sell his 8.33% interest to the Company, beginning in 2011. The
purchase price in each case is 8.33% of the product of six times
the simple average of RHBs income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization for the calendar years 2008, 2009
and 2010. The minority interest was recorded at its estimated
fair value of $6.3 million at the date of acquisition and
the difference of $5.4 million between the minority
owners interest in the historical basis of RHB and the
estimated fair value of that interest was recorded as a
liability to the minority interest and a reduction in addition
paid-in capital.
Any changes to the estimated fair value of the minority interest
will be recorded as a corresponding change in additional
paid-in-capital.
Additionally, interest will be accredited to the minority
interest liability based on the discount rate used to calculate
the fair value of the acquisition.
Based on RHBs operating results for 2008 and
managements current estimates of such results for 2009 and
2010, the Company has revised its estimate of the fair value of
the minority interest at December 31, 2008 and recorded a
reduction in the related liability and increased
paid-in-capital
by $607,000 at that date. This change in fair value estimate
also resulted in a reduction in interest accreted in the first
three quarters of 2008 on the liability by $228,000, which is
reflected as a reduction in fourth quarter interest expense.
The purchase agreement restricts the sellers from competing
against the business of RHB and from soliciting its employees
for a period of four years after the closing of the purchase.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase
price, including related direct acquisition costs for RHB (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets acquired at estimated fair value, including
approximately $10,000 of property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
19,334
|
|
Current liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(9,686
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
44,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years.
The purchase price allocation has been finalized and there were
no separately identifiable assets, other than goodwill. Other
than the adjustment to the minority interest liability and
additional
paid-in-capital
discussed above, no material adjustments were made to the
initial allocation of the purchase price.
The operations of RHB are included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the two
months ended December 31, 2007 and the year of 2008.
Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma combined
basis, as if the RHB acquisition had been consummated at the
beginning of 2006, is as follow (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
377,740
|
|
|
$
|
286,511
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
26,881
|
|
|
$
|
14,959
|
|
Diluted net income per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
For the ten months ended October 31, 2007, RHB had
unaudited revenues of approximately $72 million and
unaudited income before taxes of approximately $21 million.
The profitability of RHB for the ten month period was higher
than what was expected to continue due to some unusually high
margin contracts and may not be indicative of future results of
operations.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Employment
Agreements
Patrick T. Manning, Joseph P. Harper, Sr., James H.
Allen, Jr. and certain other officers of the Company and
its subsidiaries have employment agreements which provide for
payments of annual salary, deferred salary, incentive bonuses
and certain benefits if their employment is terminated without
cause.
Self-Insurance
The Company is self-insured for employee health claims. Its
policy is to accrue the estimated liability for known claims and
for estimated claims that have been incurred but not reported as
of each reporting date. The Company has obtained reinsurance
coverage for the policy period as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Specific excess reinsurance coverage for medical and
prescription drug claims in excess of $60,000 for each insured
person with a maximum lifetime reimbursable of $2,000,000.
|
|
|
|
Aggregate reinsurance coverage for medical and prescription drug
claims within a plan year with a maximum of approximately
$1.1 million which is the estimated maximum claims and
fixed cost based on the number of employees.
|
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, the Company incurred $1.5 million, $1.6 million
and $1.2 million, respectively, in expenses related to this
plan.
The Company is also self-insured for workers compensation
claims up to $250,000 per occurrence, with a maximum aggregate
liability of $2.7 million per year. Its policy is to accrue
the estimated liability for known claims and for estimated
claims that have been incurred but not reported as of each
reporting date. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
had recorded an estimated liability of $1,092,000 and
$1,067,000, respectively, which it believes is adequate based on
its claims history and an actuarial study. The Company has a
safety and training program in place to help prevent accidents
and injuries and works closely with its employees and the
insurance company to monitor all claims.
The Company obtains bonding on construction contracts through
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. As is
customary in the construction industry, the Company indemnifies
Travelers for any losses incurred by it in connection with bonds
that are issued. The Company has granted Travelers a security
interest in accounts receivable and contract rights for that
obligation.
F-24
Guarantees
The Company typically indemnifies contract owners for claims
arising during the construction process and carries insurance
coverage for such claims, which in the past have not been
material.
The Companys Certificate of Incorporation provides for
indemnification of its officers and directors. The Company has a
Director and Officer insurance policy that limits its exposure.
At December 31, 2008 the Company had not accrued a
liability for this guarantee, as the likelihood of incurring a
payment obligation in connection with this guarantee is believed
to be remote.
Litigation
The Company is the subject of certain claims and lawsuits
occurring in the normal course of business. Management, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, does not believe that
the outcome of these actions will have a material impact on the
financial statements of the Company.
Purchase
Commitments
To manage the risk of changes in material prices and
subcontracting costs used in tendering bids for construction
contracts, we obtain firm quotations from suppliers and
subcontractors before submitting a bid. These quotations do not
include any quantity guarantees. As soon as we are advised that
our bid is the lowest, we enter into firm contracts with most of
our materials suppliers and
sub-contractors,
thereby mitigating the risk of future price variations affecting
the contract costs.
|
|
15.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In July 2001, Robert Frickel was elected to the Board of
Directors. He is President of R.W. Frickel Company, P.C.,
an accounting firm that performs certain tax services for the
Company. Fees paid or accrued to R.W. Frickel Company for 2008,
2007 and 2006 and were approximately $39,700, $63,600 and
$57,500, respectively.
In July 2005, Patrick T. Manning married the sole beneficial
owner of Paradigm Outdoor Supply, LLC and Paradigm Outsourcing,
Inc., both of which are women-owned business enterprises. The
Paradigm companies provide materials and services to the Company
and to other contractors. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
paid approximately $0.4 million, $1.7 million and
$3.3 million, respectively, to the Paradigm companies for
materials and services.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
on all matters voted upon by the stockholders, including the
election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights.
Subject to the rights of holders of any then outstanding shares
of preferred stock, common stockholders are entitled to receive
ratably any dividends that may be declared by the Board of
Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.
Holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in net
assets upon any dissolution or liquidation after payment of
provision for all liabilities and any preferential liquidation
rights of our preferred stock then outstanding. Common stock
shares are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not
convertible into any other shares of capital stock. The rights,
preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are
subject to those of the holders of any shares of preferred stock
that may be issued in the future.
The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of one or more
classes or series of preferred stock without stockholder
approval and may establish the voting powers, designations,
preferences and rights and restrictions of such shares. No
preferred shares have been issued.
In December 1998, the Company entered into a rights agreement
with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
rights agent, providing for a dividend of one purchase right for
each outstanding share of common stock for stockholders of
record on December 29, 1998. Holders of shares of common
stock issued since that date were issued rights with their
shares. The rights traded automatically with the shares of
common
F-25
stock and became exercisable only if a takeover attempt of the
Company had occurred. The rights expired on December 29,
2008.
|
|
17.
|
Quarterly
Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31 (*)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
84,926
|
|
|
$
|
106,728
|
|
|
$
|
114,148
|
|
|
$
|
109,272
|
|
|
$
|
415,074
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,101
|
|
|
|
11,740
|
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
|
|
41,972
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
9,591
|
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
|
|
28,999
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
3,117
|
|
|
$
|
5,140
|
|
|
$
|
5,978
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders, basic:
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders, diluted:
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
68,888
|
|
|
$
|
71,275
|
|
|
$
|
77,714
|
|
|
$
|
88,343
|
|
|
$
|
306,220
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
5,632
|
|
|
|
8,046
|
|
|
|
7,915
|
|
|
|
12,093
|
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
5,711
|
|
|
|
5,125
|
|
|
|
7,754
|
|
|
|
22,396
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,511
|
|
|
$
|
3,797
|
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
4,693
|
|
|
$
|
14,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders, basic:
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders, diluted:
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See Note 13 regarding reversal in the fourth quarter of
$228,000 of interest expense accreted on the minority interest
liability in the first three quarters of 2008. |
On December 3, 2009, the Company acquired an
80 percent membership interest in Ralph L. Wadsworth
Construction Company, LLC (RLW) for
$64.7 million. RLW is a heavy civil construction company
focused on the design and construction of bridges, roads and
highways, primarily in the state of Utah. Each of the sellers,
who own the remaining 20 percent interest, has the right to
put, or require the Company to buy, his remaining membership
interest in RLW and, concurrently, the Company has the right to
acquire each remaining membership interest in 2013. Supplemental
information on an unaudited pro forma combined basis, as if the
acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of 2008, is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months Ended
|
|
|
9 Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
541,196
|
|
|
$
|
431,427
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
28,054
|
|
|
$
|
34,795
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
F-26
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
62,239
|
|
|
$
|
55,305
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
41,231
|
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
Contracts receivable, including retainage
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
|
60,582
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
6,196
|
|
|
|
7,508
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
Deposits and other current assets
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
178,534
|
|
|
|
152,722
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
71,681
|
|
|
|
77,993
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
57,232
|
|
|
|
57,232
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
308,871
|
|
|
$
|
289,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
27,475
|
|
|
$
|
26,111
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
25,693
|
|
|
|
23,127
|
|
Current maturities of long-term obligations
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
|
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
62,756
|
|
|
|
57,599
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
40,428
|
|
|
|
55,483
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
15,051
|
|
|
|
11,117
|
|
Put liability related to and noncontrolling owners
interest in subsidiary
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
63,047
|
|
|
|
72,900
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized
1,000,000 shares, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized
19,000,000 shares, 13,285,244 and 13,184,638 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
150,902
|
|
|
|
150,223
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
32,034
|
|
|
|
8,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sterling common stockholders equity
|
|
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
159,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
308,871
|
|
|
$
|
289,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements
F-27
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
103,929
|
|
|
$
|
114,148
|
|
|
$
|
319,170
|
|
|
$
|
305,802
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
87,387
|
|
|
|
101,576
|
|
|
|
272,238
|
|
|
|
273,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
16,542
|
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
|
|
46,932
|
|
|
|
32,413
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(3,508
|
)
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
(10,536
|
)
|
|
|
(10,090
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
9,432
|
|
|
|
36,366
|
|
|
|
22,282
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and earnings attributable to the
noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
13,041
|
|
|
|
9,591
|
|
|
|
36,618
|
|
|
|
22,669
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(4,214
|
)
|
|
|
(3,245
|
)
|
|
|
(12,154
|
)
|
|
|
(7,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,827
|
|
|
|
6,346
|
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in
earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
8,092
|
|
|
$
|
5,978
|
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used
in computing per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
13,275,416
|
|
|
|
13,125,671
|
|
|
|
13,229,268
|
|
|
|
13,101,766
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
13,740,464
|
|
|
|
13,705,477
|
|
|
|
13,732,834
|
|
|
|
13,702,800
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements
F-28
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
13,185
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
150,223
|
|
|
$
|
8,762
|
|
|
$
|
159,116
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,943
|
|
|
|
22,943
|
|
Unrealized holding gain on
available-for-sale
securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,285
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
150,902
|
|
|
$
|
32,034
|
|
|
$
|
183,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements
F-29
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
23,272
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements
F-30
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
Plus: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
|
|
15,053
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
|
|
9,757
|
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
5,045
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(522
|
)
|
Interest expense accreted on noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in contracts receivable
|
|
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|
|
(12,846
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
(4,244
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other current assets
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
Increase (decrease) in billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
43,032
|
|
|
|
18,929
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,392
|
)
|
|
|
(16,972
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
(Issuance) payment on note receivable
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
184
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(47,230
|
)
|
|
|
(17,329
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments
|
|
|
30,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(20,870
|
)
|
|
|
(32,946
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative daily drawdowns Credit Facility
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
Cumulative daily reductions Credit Facility
|
|
|
(155,000
|
)
|
|
|
(185,000
|
)
|
Repayments under long-term obligations
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Distribution of earnings to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
Issuance of common stock pursuant to the exercise of options and
warrants
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Expenditures related to 2007 equity offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(15,228
|
)
|
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,934
|
|
|
|
(18,555
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
55,305
|
|
|
|
80,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
62,239
|
|
|
$
|
62,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Cash paid during the period for taxes
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-31
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (Sterling or
the Company) is a leading heavy civil construction
company that specializes in the building, reconstruction and
repair of transportation and water infrastructure in large and
growing markets in Texas, Nevada and other states where we see
contracting opportunities. Our transportation infrastructure
projects include highways, roads, bridges and light rail, and
our water infrastructure projects include water, wastewater and
storm drainage systems. We provide general contracting services
primarily to public sector clients utilizing our own employees
and equipment for activities including excavating, paving, pipe
installation, and asphalt and concrete placement. We purchase
the necessary materials for our contracts, perform approximately
three-quarters of the work required by our contracts with our
own crews, and generally engage subcontractors only for
ancillary services.
Although we describe our business in this report in terms of the
services we provide, our base of customers and the geographic
areas in which we operate, we have concluded that our operations
comprise one reportable segment, heavy civil construction. In
making this determination, we considered among other things that
each project has similar economic characteristics, includes
similar construction services and processes, has similar types
of customers and is subject to similar economic and regulatory
environments. We organize, evaluate and manage our financial
information around each project when making operating decisions
and assessing our overall performance.
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein
have been prepared by Sterling, without audit, in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and should be read in conjunction with the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain information
and note disclosures prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been either condensed or
omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. The condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of
management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary to
present fairly the Companys financial position at
September 30, 2009 and the results of operations and cash
flows for the periods presented. The December 31, 2008
condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from
audited financial statements, but, as discussed above, does not
include all disclosures required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Interim
results may be subject to significant seasonal variations and
the results of operations for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for the full year.
Certain amounts on the December 31, 2008 condensed balance
sheet have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of subsidiaries in which the Company has a
greater than 50% ownership interest, and all intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
For all periods presented, the Company had no subsidiaries with
ownership interests less than 50%.
We have evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition
and disclosure through December 3, 2009.
|
|
2.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Managements
estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated
based on available information and experience; however, actual
amounts could differ from those estimates.
F-32
On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates the critical
accounting policies used to prepare its condensed consolidated
financial statements, including, but not limited to, those
related to:
|
|
|
|
|
revenue recognition
|
|
|
|
contracts and retainage receivables
|
|
|
|
inventories
|
|
|
|
impairment of long-term assets
|
|
|
|
income taxes
|
|
|
|
self-insurance; and
|
|
|
|
stock-based compensation
|
The Companys significant accounting policies are more
fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. There have
been no material changes to such significant accounting policies
since December 31, 2008 except, as discussed in
Note 3, for the segregation of net income as attributable
to the Companys common stockholders and the noncontrolling
owners interest.
|
|
3.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) established principles and requirements for how an
acquirer of another business entity: (a) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase and (c) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
Also, all direct costs of the business combination must be
charged to expense on the financial statements of the acquirer
as incurred. The new standard revises previous guidance as to
the recording of post-combination restructuring plan costs by
requiring the acquirer to record such costs separately from the
business combination. The adoption of this statement on
January 1, 2009, did not have an effect on the accompanying
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB established a framework for
measuring fair value which requires expanded disclosure about
the information used to measure fair value. The standard applies
whenever other statements require or permit assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand
the use of fair value accounting in any new circumstances. We
adopted this standard on January 1, 2009, which did not
have a material impact on the accompanying financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a standard clarifying previous
guidance on how consolidated entities should account for and
report noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries.
The standard standardizes the presentation of noncontrolling
interests (formally referred to as minority
interests) for both the consolidated balance sheet and
income statement. As a result of adopting this standard on
January 1, 2009, the accompanying financial statements
segregate net income as attributable to the Companys
common stockholders and noncontrolling owners interest.
In May 2009, the FASB set forth general standards of accounting
for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. This standard became effective in the second
quarter of 2009 and did not have a material impact on the
accompanying financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard to address the
elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose
entity. This standard will replace the quantitative-based risks
and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity
with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and
the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, this standard
will provide more timely and useful information about an
enterprises involvement with a variable interest entity.
F-33
This standard will become effective in the first quarter of
2010. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009 the Accounting Standards Codification was
established as the source of authoritative generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP
for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification
carries an equal level of authority. This standard was effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this
standard did not have a material effect on the accompanying
financial statements.
GAAP defines the fair value of financial instruments as the
amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between willing parties.
The Companys financial instruments are cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, contracts receivable,
accounts payable, mortgages payable and long-term debt. The
recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments (other than municipal bonds), contracts receivable
and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on
their short-term nature. The municipal bonds are valued at par
as their variable yields are set by the dealer, Comerica
Securities, based on the prevailing market for such securities
and paid monthly. Such bonds are classified as current assets
because of their put feature which gives the Company
the right to sell the bonds back to the dealer at any time at
par. The recorded value of long-term debt approximates its fair
value, as the debts interest rate approximate market rates.
The Company had one mortgage outstanding at September 30,
2009, and December 31, 2008. The mortgage outstanding at
September 30, 2009 was accruing interest at 3.50% at that
date and contained pre-payment penalties. To determine the fair
value of the mortgage, the amount of future cash flows was
discounted using the Companys borrowing rate on its Credit
Facility. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
the carrying value of the mortgage was $501,000 and $556,000,
respectively, which approximated its fair value.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financial
instruments.
|
|
5.
|
Cash and
Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original or remaining maturities of three months or less at the
time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Substantially all of
the cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 are uninsured temporary checking
accounts, investments in certificates of deposit and money
market funds.
The Company classifies short-term investments, other than
certificates of deposits, as securities available for sale. At
September 30, 2009, the Company had short-term investments
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Fixed income mutual funds
|
|
$
|
29,376
|
|
|
$
|
29,376
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exchange traded funds
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate municipal bonds
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
36,460
|
|
|
$
|
31,685
|
|
|
$
|
4,775
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit with original maturities between 90 and
365 days
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
41,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Valuation based upon quoted
prices for identical assets in active markets that the Company
has the ability to access at the measurement date.
F-34
Level 2 Inputs Based upon quoted prices
(other than Level 1) in active markets for similar
assets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets
that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset such as interest rates, yield curves,
volatilities and default rates and inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Inputs Based on unobservable inputs
reflecting the Companys own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset based on the best information available.
The pre-tax gains realized on short-term investment securities
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
were zero and $141,000, respectively, which are included in
other income in the accompanying statements of income. There
were also $506,000 in pre-tax unrealized gains on short-term
investments as of September 30, 2009, which are included in
other comprehensive income in stockholders equity as the
gains may be temporary. Upon sale of equity securities, the
average cost basis is used to determine the gain or loss.
The Companys inventories are stated at the lower of cost
or market as determined by the average cost method. Inventories
consist of raw materials, such as broken concrete, millings, and
quarried stone which are expected to be utilized in construction
projects in the future. The cost of inventory includes labor,
trucking and equipment costs.
|
|
7.
|
Property
and Equipment, stated at cost (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
$
|
95,126
|
|
|
$
|
96,002
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
11,690
|
|
|
|
12,358
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
Water rights
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,559
|
|
|
|
116,741
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(43,878
|
)
|
|
|
(38,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,681
|
|
|
$
|
77,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress at September 30, 2009 consists
primarily of expenditures for new maintenance shop facilities.
Basic net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders is computed by dividing net income attributable to
Sterling common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per
share attributable to Sterling common shareholders is computed
as in the basic calculation after giving effect to all
potentially dilutive common stock options and warrants using the
treasury stock method. At September 30, 2009 and 2008,
there were 96,000 and 82,300, respectively, common stock options
outstanding with a weighted average exercise price per share of
$24.05 and $24.90, respectively, which were excluded from the
year-to-date
calculation of diluted income per share as they were
anti-dilutive. Additionally, at September 30, 2009 and
2008, there were 121,400 and 82,300, respectively, common stock
options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price per
share of $22.53 and $24.90, respectively, which were excluded
from the
quarter-to-date
calculation of diluted income per share as they were
anti-dilutive.
F-35
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators
of the basic and diluted net income per common share
computations for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
8,092
|
|
|
$
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
13,275
|
|
|
|
13,126
|
|
Shares for dilutive stock options, restricted stock and warrants
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed
conversions diluted
|
|
|
13,740
|
|
|
|
13,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
14,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
13,102
|
|
Shares for dilutive stock options, restricted stock and warrants
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed
conversions diluted
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
|
|
13,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Plans and Warrants
|
The Companys stock plans, which currently have stock
options outstanding, are administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. In general, the plans
provide for all options to be issued with a per-share exercise
price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock
on the date of grant. The original terms of the options
typically do not exceed 10 years. Stock options generally
vest over a three to five year period. Note 8
Stock Options and Warrants of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 should be referred to
for additional information regarding the stock-based incentive
plans.
We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $444,000 and
$373,000 for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, (including $306,000 and $214,000,
respectively, related to restricted stock grants to non-employee
directors and certain employees discussed below). For the
quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $145,000 and $140,000,
respectively, (including $100,000 and $89,000, respectively,
related to restricted stock grants to non-employee directors and
certain employees). Unrecognized compensation expense related to
stock options at September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $198,000
and $383,000, respectively, to be recognized over a weighted
average period of approximately 1.3 and 2.2 years,
respectively. Proceeds received by the Company from the exercise
of options and warrants for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $236,000 and
$163,000, respectively. No options were granted in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.
F-36
Unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock
awards at September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $407,000 and
$309,000, respectively, to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.8 years in each case. In May 2009 and 2008, the
seven and six, respectively, non-employee directors of the
Company were each granted 2,800 and 2,564 shares of
restricted stock, at the market price on the date of grant of
$17.86 and $19.50, respectively, which will be recognized
ratably over the one year restriction period. In March 2009 and
2008, several key employees were granted an aggregated total of
8,366 and 5,672 shares of restricted stock at $17.45 and
$18.16 per share, respectively, resulting in an expense of
$146,000 and $103,000 to be recognized ratably over the five
year restriction period. In June 2008, another non-employee
director was re-elected to the board and was awarded
2,564 shares of restricted stock at $19.50 per share.
At September 30, 2009, there were 370,378 shares
covered by outstanding restricted stock and stock options and
334,046 shares covered by outstanding stock warrants. Of
these, 49,927 shares of restricted stock and stock options
were unvested and zero warrants were unvested.
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated income tax
returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in certain
states. The Company is no longer subject to federal tax
examinations for years prior to 2003 and state income tax
examinations prior to 2005. The Companys policy is to
recognize interest related to any underpayment of taxes as
interest expense, and penalties as administrative expenses. No
interest or penalties have been accrued at September 30,
2009 and 2008.
The effective income tax rates for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 were 32.3% and 33.2%,
respectively, of income before income taxes and noncontrolling
interest as compared to 33.8% and 33.6% for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The
difference between the effective tax rates and the statutory
rate of 35% is the result of permanent differences, including
the portion of earnings of a subsidiary taxed to the
noncontrolling interest owner and production tax credit, offset
by the Texas franchise tax. Additionally, the portion of our tax
expense arising from changes in deferred tax assets and
liabilities was $4,878 and $6,565 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
11.
|
Noncontrolling
Interest in Subsidiary
|
The noncontrolling interest owner of one of the Companys
subsidiaries has the right to put, or require the Company to
buy, his remaining 8.33% interest in the subsidiary and,
concurrently, the Company has the right to require that the
owner sell his 8.33% interest to the Company, beginning in 2011.
The purchase price in each case is 8.33% of the product of six
times the simple average of the subsidiarys income before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the calendar
years 2008, 2009 and 2010. At the date of acquisition, the
difference between the noncontrolling owners interest in
the historical basis of the subsidiary and the estimated
fair value of that interest was recorded as a liability to
noncontrolling interest and a reduction in additional
paid-in-capital.
Any changes to the estimated fair value of the noncontrolling
interest will be recorded as a corresponding change in
additional
paid-in-capital.
Additionally, interest expense ($155,000 and $376,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively) has been accreted to the noncontrolling interest
liability based on the discount rate used to calculate the fair
value.
The following table summarizes the changes in the noncontrolling
interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
6,300
|
|
|
$
|
6,362
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Accretion of interest on noncontrolling interest liability
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
7,568
|
|
|
$
|
7,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
On December 3, 2009, the Company acquired an 80 percent
membership interest in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company,
LLC (RLW) for $64.7 million. RLW is a heavy civil
construction company focused on the design and construction of
bridges, roads and highways, primarily in the state of Utah.
Each of the sellers, who own the remaining 20 percent interest,
has the right to put, or require the Company to buy, his
remaining membership interest in RLW and, concurrently, the
Company has the right to acquire each remaining membership
interest in 2013. Supplemental information on an unaudited pro
forma combined basis, as if the acquisition had been consummated
at the beginning of 2008, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months Ended
|
|
|
9 Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
541,196
|
|
|
$
|
431,427
|
|
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
|
$
|
28,054
|
|
|
$
|
34,795
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
F-38
SHELLEY &
COMPANY
Certified Public Accountants
11576 South State, Suite 1102
Draper, Utah 84020
Tel
(801) 565-1547
Fax
(801) 565-4709
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, Inc.
Draper, Utah
I have audited the comparative balance sheets of Ralph L.
Wadsworth Construction Company, Inc. (A Utah Corporation) as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the comparative statements
of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on my audit.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards in the United States of America. Those
standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. I believe that my audits provide a
reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its
operations and its comparative cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, generally accepted in
the United States of America.
/s/ Shelley & Company
Shelley & Company
Draper, Utah 84020
March 7, 2009
F-39
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,145,408
|
|
|
$
|
21,775,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
12,077,899
|
|
|
|
10,710,599
|
|
Retainage
|
|
|
5,415,928
|
|
|
|
4,047,792
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
|
|
17,493,827
|
|
|
|
14,790,637
|
|
Inventory at cost
|
|
|
60,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities held for sale
|
|
|
13,672,808
|
|
|
|
4,665,650
|
|
Deposits refundable
|
|
|
147,840
|
|
|
|
176,490
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
82,230
|
|
|
|
135,623
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
314,833
|
|
|
|
683,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
56,917,799
|
|
|
|
42,227,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AT COST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
|
10,374,699
|
|
|
|
7,485,266
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
3,294,106
|
|
|
|
2,450,025
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
877,018
|
|
|
|
736,408
|
|
Land
|
|
|
266,501
|
|
|
|
266,501
|
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
|
386,426
|
|
|
|
308,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
15,198,750
|
|
|
|
11,246,633
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
5,142,104
|
|
|
|
4,655,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
10,056,646
|
|
|
|
6,591,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS Deposits
|
|
|
2,766
|
|
|
|
18,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
66,977,211
|
|
|
$
|
48,837,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable Including retainage of $2,980,248
& $1,988,350
|
|
$
|
10,723,817
|
|
|
$
|
8,295,134
|
|
Accrued wages payable
|
|
|
519,403
|
|
|
|
332,970
|
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
|
|
143,343
|
|
|
|
62,736
|
|
Pension & profit sharing payable
|
|
|
25,828
|
|
|
|
24,853
|
|
Note stockholder
|
|
|
30,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
14,212,949
|
|
|
|
13,552,527
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,290,010
|
|
|
|
738,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
27,445,426
|
|
|
|
23,007,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts payable
|
|
|
5,117,393
|
|
|
|
1,861,593
|
|
Less: Current portion shown above
|
|
|
1,290,011
|
|
|
|
738,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
3,827,382
|
|
|
|
1,122,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
31,272,808
|
|
|
|
24,129,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $1 par value; 50,000 shares
authorized; 5,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Less: 452 shares treasury stock at cost
|
|
|
275,634
|
|
|
|
275,634
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (loss) on securities
|
|
|
(278,032
|
)
|
|
|
191,194
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
36,253,069
|
|
|
|
24,787,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
35,704,403
|
|
|
|
24,707,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
66,977,211
|
|
|
$
|
48,837,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-40
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
CONSTRUCTION REVENUE
|
|
$
|
126,121,531
|
|
|
$
|
92,226,668
|
|
|
$
|
91,350,056
|
|
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
|
|
|
100,485,619
|
|
|
|
76,438,503
|
|
|
|
70,688,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
25,635,912
|
|
|
|
15,788,165
|
|
|
|
20,661,199
|
|
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
|
|
|
5,041,429
|
|
|
|
5,882,326
|
|
|
|
3,474,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
20,594,483
|
|
|
|
9,905,839
|
|
|
|
17,186,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment usage income
|
|
|
164,101
|
|
|
|
40,697
|
|
|
|
134,525
|
|
Service agreement income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,323
|
|
Interest & dividend income
|
|
|
1,135,073
|
|
|
|
1,238,950
|
|
|
|
891,050
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(120,047
|
)
|
|
|
(25,145
|
)
|
|
|
(31,307
|
)
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
|
71,772
|
|
|
|
72,369
|
|
|
|
82,366
|
|
Fort Union LLC-rental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,302
|
|
|
|
46,229
|
|
Gain(loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
419,746
|
|
|
|
141,921
|
|
|
|
(46,623
|
)
|
Gain(loss) on sale of investments
|
|
|
(690,303
|
)
|
|
|
254,841
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER INCOME EXPENSE
|
|
|
980,342
|
|
|
|
1,740,935
|
|
|
|
1,237,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
21,574,825
|
|
|
$
|
11,646,774
|
|
|
$
|
18,424,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-41
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
12,239,359
|
|
Add: Net income for the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
18,424,430
|
|
Less: Dividends paid
|
|
|
4,579,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
26,084,101
|
|
Add: Net income for the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
11,646,774
|
|
Less: Dividends paid
|
|
|
12,943,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS December 31, 2007
|
|
|
24,787,355
|
|
Add: Net income for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
21,574,825
|
|
Less: Dividends paid
|
|
|
10,109,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
36,253,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-42
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
21,574,825
|
|
|
$
|
11,646,774
|
|
|
$
|
18,424,430
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,740,348
|
|
|
|
1,191,511
|
|
|
|
959,403
|
|
Loss(Gain) on sale of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
(419,746
|
)
|
|
|
(141,921
|
)
|
|
|
46,623
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
690,303
|
|
|
|
(254,841
|
)
|
|
|
(3,049
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,735,436
|
)
|
|
|
159,413
|
|
|
|
(681,284
|
)
|
Accounts receivable other
|
|
|
32,246
|
|
|
|
(32,002
|
)
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
Notes receivable related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,745,975
|
|
|
|
(1,144,651
|
)
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,537
|
)
|
Note receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(60,853
|
)
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
32,460
|
|
Refundable deposits
|
|
|
28,650
|
|
|
|
316,972
|
|
|
|
(493,462
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
53,393
|
|
|
|
(29,894
|
)
|
|
|
4,207
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
368,943
|
|
|
|
(303,655
|
)
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,428,683
|
|
|
|
(321,093
|
)
|
|
|
144,561
|
|
Accrued wages payable
|
|
|
186,433
|
|
|
|
101,394
|
|
|
|
(34,075
|
)
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
|
|
80,607
|
|
|
|
(16,467
|
)
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
Accrued pension payable
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
12,586
|
|
|
|
(2,659
|
)
|
Stockholder note payable
|
|
|
30,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,371
|
)
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
660,422
|
|
|
|
6,182,147
|
|
|
|
(4,781,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED BY) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
25,159,869
|
|
|
|
22,258,687
|
|
|
|
12,503,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase marketable securities
|
|
|
(13,051,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,519,218
|
)
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(5,344,586
|
)
|
|
|
(2,953,985
|
)
|
|
|
(2,263,394
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investments
|
|
|
2,884,926
|
|
|
|
8,757,770
|
|
|
|
3,200,663
|
|
(Increase) decrease in deposits
|
|
|
15,749
|
|
|
|
3,811
|
|
|
|
71,427
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
558,967
|
|
|
|
168,693
|
|
|
|
12,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED BY) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(14,936,558
|
)
|
|
|
5,976,289
|
|
|
|
(11,497,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(10,109,111
|
)
|
|
|
(11,960,188
|
)
|
|
|
(4,579,688
|
)
|
Increase in long-term liabilities
|
|
|
4,426,430
|
|
|
|
1,694,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(1,170,630
|
)
|
|
|
(899,748
|
)
|
|
|
(252,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (APPLIED TO) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(6,853,311
|
)
|
|
|
(11,164,948
|
)
|
|
|
(4,832,564
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
3,370,000
|
|
|
|
17,070,028
|
|
|
|
(3,826,707
|
)
|
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
21,775,408
|
|
|
|
4,705,380
|
|
|
|
8,532,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
25,145,408
|
|
|
$
|
21,775,408
|
|
|
$
|
4,705,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
120,047
|
|
|
$
|
25,145
|
|
|
$
|
31,307
|
|
Non-cash property distribution
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
983,332
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
F-43
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 AND 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
21,574,825
|
|
|
|
11,646,774
|
|
|
|
18,424,430
|
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale-securities
|
|
|
(469,226
|
)
|
|
|
(109,453
|
)
|
|
|
326,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
$
|
21,105,599
|
|
|
$
|
11,537,321
|
|
|
$
|
18,751,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-44
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
DECEMBER
31, 2008
|
|
NOTE A
|
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Companys
Activities and Operating Cycles
The Companys expertise is in heavy highway and bridge
construction for both public and private clients-throughout the
intermountain west. Other areas of expertise include
design-build, concrete paving, pile-driving and shoring, steel
erection, commercial & industrial building
construction and water tank construction. The work is performed
under fixed contracts and unit price contracts modified by
incentive and penalty provisions. Contract length varies from 3
to 30 months.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks
and all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three
months or less at the time of purchase.
Marketable
Securities Held For Sale
All Marketable Securities are stated at market value. By policy,
the Company invests primarily in high-grade marketable
securities. All marketable securities are defined as trading
securities . The Company used the first in, first out (FIFO)
Method of determining cost for realized gains or losses. The
total amount of $13,672,808 and $4,665,650 is presented as a
current asset in 2008 and 2007 respectfully. The fair market
value of assets is determined by outside valuation. Unrealized
holding gains (loss) on securities of $(278,032) and $191,194
are shown as a separate line item of stockholders equity
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
Fixed
Assets and Depreciation
Fixed assets are carried at cost. Maintenance repairs and minor
renewals are charged against earnings when incurred. Additions
and major renewals are capitalized.
The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired
are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is
reflected in earnings.
The company uses straight line depreciation with the following
useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
Assets
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
3-7 Years
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
3-5 Years
|
Construction equipment
|
|
3-7 Years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
15 Years
|
Rental real estate
|
|
391/2
Years
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
STRAIGHT LINE
|
|
$
|
1,740,348
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,511
|
|
|
$
|
959,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,740,348
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,511
|
|
|
$
|
959,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has instigated a depreciation allocation program to
allocate depreciation to various jobs based on equipment usage
applied on an equipment usage rate previously. During 2008, 2007
and 2006 the Company applied $1,510,843, $978,846 and $820,637
in depreciation to jobs in progress.
F-45
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company instigated a maintenance allocation program to
allocate maintenance and shop costs to various jobs based on
fair value equipment usage. The Company applied in total
$3,789,969, $3,281,705 and $3,102,765 in maintenance and
depreciation to jobs in progress in 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Inventory
The Company has an inventory of construction materials. The
inventory is carried at cost and consists of the following as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Construction materials
|
|
$
|
60,853
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
60,853
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
Expenses
The Company has recognized as prepaid expenses the following
items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
$
|
82,230
|
|
|
$
|
135,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,230
|
|
|
$
|
135,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Warranty
Costs
The Company has accrued a provision for estimated warranty costs
for projects that specify a warranty provision in the contract.
The warranty provision is based on the total estimated warranty
costs specified in certain project contracts, multiplied by a
warranty experienced probability rate determined by the
Companys warranty claim history. For the year ended
December 31, 2008 the Company accrued $500,000 in warranty
expenses to various jobs.
Income
Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed under the provisions of
Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. The company will not
incur federal or state income taxes, instead its earnings
and losses will be included in the stockholders personal
income tax returns and will be taxed based on the
stockholders personal tax strategies.
The Company plans to pay dividends totaling $2,357,000 to
stockholders in April 2009 for payment of personal income taxes
arising from the Companys 2008 income.
Construction
Contracts
The Company has elected to report income from its long term
construction contracts by the percentage of completion method
for financial statement presentation. In managements
opinion this method fairly presents the companys results
of operations and changes in financial position. For income tax
purposes the company
F-46
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
has elected to also report on the percentage of completion
method of accounting See
Note A Income Taxes.
Earnings on long-term construction contracts are recognized on
the
percentage-of-completion
method in the ratio that costs incurred bear to total estimated
costs. Because of inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it
is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will
change within the near term. Earnings and costs on contracts are
subject to revision throughout the terms of the contracts, and
any required adjustments are made in the period in which
revisions become known. Provisions are made for the full amounts
of anticipated losses in the period in which they are first
determinable. Claims for additional contract revenues are
recognized to the extent of costs incurred if it is probable
that the claim will result in additional revenue and the amount
can be reliably estimated. Profit on such claims is not
recognized until the claims have been allowed. Changes in job
performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability may
result in revisions to costs and income, which are recognized in
the period in which the revisions are determined. Changes in
estimated job profitability resulting from job performance, job
conditions, contract penalty provisions, claims, change orders,
and settlements, are accounted for as changes in estimates in
the current period.
Balances billed but not paid pursuant to retainage provisions
under construction contracts generally become due upon
completion of the contracts and acceptance by the owners.
Construction contracts are normally completed within one or two
years.
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts comprise principally revenues recognized
on contracts for which billings have not been presented to the
contract owners at the balance sheet date. Such revenues are
expected to be billed and collected generally within one year.
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts comprise principally revenues for which
billings have been presented to contract owners for which a
proportionate amount of costs have yet to be expended. Such
costs are anticipated to be expended and excess billings earned
within one year.
Un-Incorporated
Joint Venture Interest
The Company as a 25% member/owner in an unincorporated limited
liability company joint venture on the I-15 NOW Design Build
project has included its 25% interest share of the
following financial information in the financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
2,507,120
|
|
|
$
|
8,426,774
|
|
|
$
|
5,288,915
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
1,562,155
|
|
|
$
|
3,049,246
|
|
|
$
|
3,050,109
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
803,118
|
|
|
$
|
1,316,669
|
|
|
$
|
1,777,934
|
|
Billing Excess of Cost
|
|
$
|
1,686,308
|
|
|
$
|
7,336,891
|
|
|
$
|
5,140,895
|
|
Earned Revenue
|
|
$
|
66,552,532
|
|
|
$
|
42,205,632
|
|
|
$
|
16,638,133
|
|
Earned Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
7,140,672
|
|
|
$
|
5,486,321
|
|
|
$
|
1,785,168
|
|
Compensated
Absences
Employees of the Company are entitled to paid vacations and sick
leave depending on job classification, length of service and
other factors. The Company has recognized $216,705 and $208,514
as a liability for vacation and sick pay that is due and payable
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
F-47
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
401(k)
Plan
The Company has established a 401(k) plan for employees of the
corporation. The Board of Directors has elected to contribute
$384,104, $333,704 and $177,725 for the periods ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Money
Purchase Pension Plan
The Company has an approved Money Purchase Pension Plan which
provides a contribution to all employees performing work on
federally funded projects requiring certified payroll. Employees
who are fully vested may withdraw the contribution from the plan
upon termination of employment or retirement. Payments to the
plan for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
were $46,526, $111,388 and $119,096.
Dividends
The Board of Directors declared and paid dividends on
outstanding shares of common stock at December 31, 2008 and
2007. The Company paid $10,109,111 in 2008 and $12,943,520 in
2007.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that property
and equipment or other assets may be impaired, an evaluation
recoverability would be performed. If an evaluation required,
the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the
asset are compared to the assets carrying amount to
determine if a write-down to fair value is necessary.
|
|
NOTE B
|
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES
|
The following summarizes the Companys long-term debt at
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
7 Contracts payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $9,439 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2010.
|
|
$
|
176,051
|
|
|
$
|
273,162
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $16,425 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2011.
|
|
$
|
459,889
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
5 Contracts payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $3,424 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2012.
|
|
$
|
156,305
|
|
|
$
|
117,479
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $9,378 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2009.
|
|
$
|
112,538
|
|
|
$
|
225,076
|
|
8 Contracts payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $5,469 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2013.
|
|
$
|
279,183
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $7,333 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2012.
|
|
$
|
293,315
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $4,458 with
interest at 0% annual rate due 2010.
|
|
$
|
80,240
|
|
|
$
|
133,734
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $10,073 interest
at 4.92% annual rate due 2012.
|
|
$
|
387,899
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $16,565 with
interest at 4.92% annual rate due 2012.
|
|
$
|
637,931
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $2,774 with
interest at 5.68% annual rate due 2012.
|
|
$
|
107,714
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
F-48
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $11,618 with
interest at 5.56% annual rate due 2012.
|
|
$
|
452,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
installments to reflect
1/3
principle payments in 2010 through 2012 with a variable interest
rate of 3.536% increasing to 3.965% by 2012.
|
|
$
|
1,309,670
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $17,769 every
other month for 2005 then increases to $20,970 per month with
interest at 5.24%.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
244,637
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
principal & interest installments of $20,717 with
interest at 5.9% annual rate due 2011.
|
|
$
|
664,652
|
|
|
$
|
867,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
$
|
5,117,393
|
|
|
$
|
1,861,593
|
|
LESS CURRENT PORTION
|
|
$
|
1,290,011
|
|
|
$
|
738,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
$
|
3,827,382
|
|
|
$
|
1,122,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys long-term maturities for the next five years
are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,290,011
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
738,966
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,601,092
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
505,628
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,384,624
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
357,527
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
815,617
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
246,418
|
|
2013 & after
|
|
$
|
26,049
|
|
|
2012 & after
|
|
$
|
13,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
5,117,393
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,861,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE C RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company rents an office building from a related party. The
building is located at 166 East 14000 South #200, Draper,
Utah. The rent for this location is $23,975 per month. The rate
will increase 3% per year. The Company rents a shop on Dannon
Way from related parties and pays $12,000 per month.
The future lease payments as of December 31, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
431,700
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
440,311
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
449,221
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
458,378
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
467,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,247,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into a service agreement with Wadsworth
Development Group LLC, a Utah LLC, whose members are all related
parties. The LLC is in the business of developing real property
for retail, commercial, industrial
and/or
office uses. The Company has agreed to provide furnished office
space, support staff and support equipment. All rates are based
on fair market rates or actual costs. The term of the agreement
is for one year beginning, January 1, 2005 with additional
one year options. The options have been exercised for 2007
through 2009.
F-49
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has various notes payable, as of December 31,
2008, to stockholders in the amount of $30,076 with interest at
5% per annum.
The Company has several contracts as of December 31, 2008
totaling $3,066,756 with backlog at $236,091 with related
parties. These are handled in an arms length contract at cost
and are subject to normal construction draws. Related party
contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
The Exchange Building E
|
|
$
|
2,138,260
|
|
|
$
|
175,051
|
|
Exchange Site Work
|
|
$
|
794,703
|
|
|
$
|
60,399
|
|
Copper Ridge Site
|
|
$
|
133,793
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,066,756
|
|
|
$
|
236,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE D
|
CONTRACTS
IN PROCESS
|
Information with respect to contracts in process at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expenditures on uncompleted contracts
|
|
$
|
206,897,159
|
|
|
$
|
145,677,763
|
|
Estimated earnings thereon
|
|
|
46,062,848
|
|
|
|
27,108,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,960,007
|
|
|
|
172,785,829
|
|
Less: Billings applicable thereto
|
|
|
266,858,123
|
|
|
|
185,654,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,898,116
|
|
|
$
|
12,868,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the accompanying balance sheet under the following
captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
$
|
314,833
|
|
|
$
|
683,776
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
14,212,949
|
|
|
|
13,552,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,898,116
|
|
|
$
|
12,868,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following schedule summarizes changes in backlog on
contracts during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006. Backlog represents the amount of revenue the company
expects to realize from work to be performed on uncompleted
contracts in progress at year end and from contractual
agreements on which work has not yet begun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Back log balance Beginning
|
|
$
|
54,584,937
|
|
|
$
|
104,907,975
|
|
|
$
|
114,672,314
|
|
New contracts during the year
|
|
|
165,594,281
|
|
|
|
41,903,630
|
|
|
|
81,585,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,179,218
|
|
|
|
146,811,605
|
|
|
|
196,258,031
|
|
Less: contract revenue earned during the year
|
|
|
126,121,531
|
|
|
|
92,226,668
|
|
|
|
91,350,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back log balance Ending
|
|
$
|
94,057,687
|
|
|
$
|
54,584,937
|
|
|
$
|
104,907,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, the Company has entered into additional contracts
totaling $3,612,285 between January 1, 2009 and
March 7, 2009. The Company also has an ongoing design build
project estimated to be $52 million when approved.
|
|
NOTE F
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary
cash investments and trade accounts receivables. The Company
places its temporary cash investments with financial
institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one
financial institution. Concentrations of credit risk with
respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number
of customers comprising the Companys customer base and
their dispersion across different industries and geographic
areas. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007 the Company had no
significant concentration of risk.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk Arising from Cash Deposits in Excess of Insured
Limits
The Company maintains cash balances at several financial
institutions located in Utah. Accounts at each institution are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to
$250,000 per account. The Company also has additional accounts
backed by the Full Faith & Credit of the United States
Government. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Companys uninsured cash balances total $11,400,408 and
$21,675,408.
F-51
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
12,675,699
|
|
|
$
|
25,145,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
27,319,299
|
|
|
|
12,077,899
|
|
Retainage
|
|
|
9,897,858
|
|
|
|
5,415,928
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
70,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
|
|
37,287,725
|
|
|
|
17,493,827
|
|
Inventory at cost
|
|
|
263,543
|
|
|
|
60,853
|
|
Marketable securities held for sale
|
|
|
18,026,710
|
|
|
|
13,672,808
|
|
Deposits refundable
|
|
|
128,910
|
|
|
|
147,840
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,230
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
1,470,285
|
|
|
|
314,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
69,852,872
|
|
|
|
56,917,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AT COST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
|
13,800,869
|
|
|
|
10,374,699
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
3,528,697
|
|
|
|
3,294,106
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
1,103,234
|
|
|
|
877,018
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,501
|
|
Leasehold improvement
|
|
|
386,426
|
|
|
|
386,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
18,819,226
|
|
|
|
15,198,750
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
6,955,370
|
|
|
|
5,142,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
11,863,856
|
|
|
|
10,056,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS Deposits
|
|
|
24,932
|
|
|
|
2,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
81,741,660
|
|
|
$
|
66,977,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable Including retainage of $4,847,374
and $2,980,248
|
|
$
|
20,809,536
|
|
|
$
|
10,723,817
|
|
Accrued wages payable
|
|
|
1,376,145
|
|
|
|
519,403
|
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
|
|
198,051
|
|
|
|
143,343
|
|
Pension & profit sharing payable
|
|
|
53,433
|
|
|
|
25,828
|
|
Stockholder note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,076
|
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
17,911,220
|
|
|
|
14,212,949
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,095,951
|
|
|
|
1,290,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
42,444,336
|
|
|
|
27,445,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts payable
|
|
$
|
6,876,021
|
|
|
|
5,117,393
|
|
Less: Current portion shown above
|
|
|
2,095,951
|
|
|
|
1,290,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
4,780,070
|
|
|
|
3,827,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
47,224,406
|
|
|
|
31,272,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $1 par value; 50,000 shares
authorized;5,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Less: 452 shares treasury stock at cost
|
|
|
275,634
|
|
|
|
275,634
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (loss) on securities
|
|
|
187,008
|
|
|
|
(278,032
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
34,600,880
|
|
|
|
36,253,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
34,517,254
|
|
|
|
35,704,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
81,741,660
|
|
|
$
|
66,977,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-52
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
CONSTRUCTION REVENUE
|
|
$
|
59,916,686
|
|
|
$
|
29,887,006
|
|
|
$
|
112,257,256
|
|
|
$
|
94,112,925
|
|
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
|
|
|
42,975,353
|
|
|
|
24,844,861
|
|
|
|
83,678,280
|
|
|
|
73,449,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
16,941,333
|
|
|
|
5,042,145
|
|
|
|
28,578,976
|
|
|
|
20,663,677
|
|
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
|
|
|
1,427,028
|
|
|
|
1,126,118
|
|
|
|
4,081,352
|
|
|
|
3,636,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
15,514,305
|
|
|
|
3,916,027
|
|
|
|
24,497,624
|
|
|
|
17,027,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest & dividend income
|
|
|
250,215
|
|
|
|
274,274
|
|
|
|
510,248
|
|
|
|
857,552
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(62,872
|
)
|
|
|
(34,061
|
)
|
|
|
(160,218
|
)
|
|
|
(69,336
|
)
|
Gain (Loss) on sale of investments
|
|
|
(28,300
|
)
|
|
|
(10,264
|
)
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
11,589
|
|
Gain (Loss) on sale of equipment
|
|
|
(26,276
|
)
|
|
|
18,806
|
|
|
|
(23,586
|
)
|
|
|
364,516
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
56,382
|
|
|
|
(24,759
|
)
|
|
|
33,704
|
|
|
|
97,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
189,149
|
|
|
|
223,996
|
|
|
|
371,219
|
|
|
|
1,262,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
15,703,454
|
|
|
$
|
4,140,023
|
|
|
$
|
24,868,843
|
|
|
$
|
18,289,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-53
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS JANUARY 1, 2009 AND 2008
|
|
$
|
36,253,069
|
|
|
$
|
24,787,355
|
|
Add: Net income (loss) for the nine months period ended
September 30, 2009 & 2008
|
|
|
24,868,843
|
|
|
|
18,289,142
|
|
Less: Dividends Paid
|
|
|
26,521,032
|
|
|
|
9,882,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
|
$
|
34,600,880
|
|
|
$
|
33,193,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-54
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Period
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
24,868,843
|
|
|
$
|
18,289,142
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,752,087
|
|
|
|
1,245,370
|
|
Loss (Gain) on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
(11,071
|
)
|
|
|
(11,589
|
)
|
Loss (Gain) on sale of equipment
|
|
|
23,586
|
|
|
|
(364,516
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(19,723,330
|
)
|
|
|
(2,531,058
|
)
|
Accounts receivable-related parties
|
|
|
(70,568
|
)
|
|
|
32,246
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(202,690
|
)
|
|
|
(23,619
|
)
|
Deposits refundable
|
|
|
18,930
|
|
|
|
11,013
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
82,230
|
|
|
|
95,524
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(1,155,452
|
)
|
|
|
(2,036,499
|
)
|
(Decrease) Increase in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
10,085,719
|
|
|
|
3,883,464
|
|
Accrued wages payable
|
|
|
856,742
|
|
|
|
594,383
|
|
Accrued taxes payable
|
|
|
54,708
|
|
|
|
26,720
|
|
Pension & profit sharing plan
|
|
|
27,605
|
|
|
|
23,460
|
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
3,698,271
|
|
|
|
(371,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
19,805,610
|
|
|
|
19,362,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(4,662,296
|
)
|
|
|
(7,106,765
|
)
|
Decrease (Increase) in deposits
|
|
|
(22,166
|
)
|
|
|
(62,488
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
13,365
|
|
|
|
495,028
|
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
784,505
|
|
|
|
304,633
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(4,226,142
|
)
|
|
|
(3,948,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH (APPLIED TO) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(8,112,734
|
)
|
|
|
(10,318,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase notes payable stockholders
|
|
|
(30,076
|
)
|
|
|
5,673
|
|
Increase long term liabilities
|
|
|
2,820,130
|
|
|
|
3,116,791
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(25,891,137
|
)
|
|
|
(9,882,988
|
)
|
Repayment of long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(1,061,502
|
)
|
|
|
(791,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH (APPLIED) TO FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(24,162,585
|
)
|
|
|
(7,551,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
(12,469,709
|
)
|
|
|
1,492,964
|
|
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
25,145,408
|
|
|
|
21,775,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
$
|
12,675,699
|
|
|
$
|
23,268,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
160,218
|
|
|
$
|
69,336
|
|
Non-Cash property distribution
|
|
|
629,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-55
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Period
|
|
|
Nine Months Period
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
15,703,454
|
|
|
$
|
4,140,023
|
|
|
$
|
24,868,843
|
|
|
$
|
18,289,142
|
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available for-sale-securities
|
|
|
492,469
|
|
|
|
(450,227
|
)
|
|
|
465,040
|
|
|
|
(828,317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
$
|
16,195,923
|
|
|
$
|
3,689,796
|
|
|
$
|
25,333,883
|
|
|
$
|
17,460,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-56
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
|
|
NOTE A
|
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Companys
Activities and Operating Cycles
The Company constructs large commercial and industrial projects.
The work is performed under fixed contracts and fixed price
contracts modified by incentive and penalty provisions. Contract
length varies from 3 to 30 months.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks
and all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three
months or less at the time of purchase.
Marketable
Securities Available For Sale
All marketable securities are stated at market value. By policy,
the Company invests primarily in high-grade marketable
securities. All marketable securities are defined as available
for sale. The Company used the first in, first out (FIFO) method
of determining cost for realized gains or losses. The total
amount of $18,026,710 and $13,672,808 is presented as a current
asset. The fair market value of assets is determined by outside
valuation. Unrealized holding gains (loss) on securities of
$187,008 and $(278,032) is shown as a separate line item of
stockholders equity as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
Fixed
Assets and Depreciation
Fixed assets are carried at cost. Maintenance repairs and minor
renewals are charged against earnings when incurred. Additions
and major renewals are capitalized.
The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired
are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is
reflected in earnings.
The company uses straight line depreciation with the following
useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Asset
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
3-7 Years
|
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
Construction equipment
|
|
|
3-7 Years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10-39 Years
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
391/2
Years
|
|
Depreciation expense for the nine months period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
$
|
1,752,087
|
|
|
$
|
1,245,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,752,087
|
|
|
$
|
1,245,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a depreciation allocation program to allocate
depreciation to various jobs based on equipment usage applied on
an equipment usage rate. For the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 the Company applied $1,587,446
and $1,075,885 in depreciation to jobs in progress.
F-57
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Managements
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Warranty
Costs
Historically, the Company has accrued a provision for estimated
warranty costs for projects that specify a warranty provision in
the contract. The warranty provision is based on the total
estimated warranty costs specified in certain project contracts,
multiplied by a warranty experience probability rate determined
by the Companys warranty claim history. The company has
elected not to accrue any warranty costs for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2009 because, in
managements opinion, the probability of any warranty
costs, as related to specific contracts, has been sufficiently
reduced as to not require an accrual.
Income
Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed under the provisions of
Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company will not
incur federal or state income taxes, instead its earnings
and losses will be included in the stockholders personal
income tax returns and will be taxed based on the
stockholders personal tax strategies.
Inventory
The Company has inventories of construction materials. All
inventories are carried at lower of cost or market and consists
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Construction materials
|
|
$
|
263,543
|
|
|
$
|
60,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
Contracts
The Company has elected to report income from its long term
construction contracts by the percentage of completion method
for financial statement presentation. In managements
opinion this method fairly presents the Companys results
of operations and changes in financial position.
Earnings on long-term construction contracts are recognized on
the
percentage-of-completion
method in the ratio that costs incurred bear to total estimated
costs. Earnings and costs on contracts are subject to revision
throughout the terms of the contracts, and any required
adjustments are made in the period in which revisions become
known. Provisions are made for the full amounts of anticipated
losses in the period in which they are first determinable.
Claims for additional contract revenues are recognized to the
extent of costs incurred if it is probable that the claim will
result in additional revenue and the amount can be reliably
estimated. Profit on such claims is not recognized until the
claims have been allowed. Changes in job performance, job
conditions, and estimated profitability may result in revisions
to costs and income, which are recognized in the period in which
the revisions are determined. Changes in estimated job
profitability resulting from job performance, job conditions,
contract penalty provisions, claims, change orders, and
settlements, are accounted for as changes in estimates in the
current period.
F-58
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Balances billed but not paid pursuant to retainage provisions
under construction contracts generally become due upon
completion of the contracts and acceptance by the owners.
Construction contracts are normally completed within one or two
years.
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts comprise principally revenues recognized
on contracts for which billings have not been presented to the
contract owners at the balance sheet date. Such revenues are
expected to be billed and collected generally within one year.
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts comprise principally revenues for which
billings have been presented to contract owners for which a
proportionate amount of costs have yet to be expended. Such
costs are anticipated to be expended and excess billings earned
within one year.
The Company has three cost plus percentage of costs contracts,
with a related party See Note C. Under a cost
plus percentage of costs arrangement, the Company receives a fee
based on the direct costs expended on certain contracts.
Unincorporated
Joint Venture Interest
The Company, as a 25% member/owner in an unincorporated limited
liability company joint venture on the I-15 NOW Design Build
project, has included its share of the following financial
information in the financial statements for the nine months
period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,899,752
|
|
|
$
|
6,697,604
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
873,384
|
|
|
$
|
1,041,634
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
353,075
|
|
|
$
|
1,022,286
|
|
Total Contract 25% Interest
|
|
$
|
59,764,056
|
|
|
$
|
59,700,565
|
|
Earned Revenue 25% Interest
|
|
$
|
59,515,920
|
|
|
$
|
57,539,652
|
|
Earned Gross Profit 25% Interest
|
|
$
|
13,371,284
|
|
|
$
|
12,529,454
|
|
Billings Excess of Cost
|
|
$
|
248,136
|
|
|
$
|
1,852,477
|
|
Compensated
Absences
Employees of the Company are entitled to paid vacations and sick
leave depending on job classification, length of service and
other factors. The Company has recognized $287,885 and $216,705
as a liability for vacation and sick pay that is due and payable
on the Company books as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 and is included in accrued wages.
Profit
Sharing/Pension Plan
The Company has established a 401(K) profit sharing plan and a
401(k) Roth plan for employees of the corporation. The Board of
Directors has elected to match contributions in the amount of
$267,266 and $251,831 for the nine months period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The Company has a Money Purchase Pension Plan, which is job cost
coded to various jobs. Earned pension costs for the nine months
period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $81,116 and
$31,983.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that property
and equipment or other assets may be impaired, an evaluation
recoverability would be performed. If an evaluation required,
the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the
asset are compared to the assets carrying amount to
determine if a write-down to fair value is necessary.
F-59
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Long-Term
Liabilities
The following summarizes the Companys long-term debt at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $716 per month
with interest at .0% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
23,633
|
|
|
$
|
30,078
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $817 per month
with interest at 1.9% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
33,183
|
|
|
$
|
40,013
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $679 per month
with interest at 1.9% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
28,194
|
|
|
$
|
33,856
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $641 per month
with interest at 1.9% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
26,643
|
|
|
$
|
31,993
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $607 per month
with interest at .0% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
26,717
|
|
|
$
|
32,182
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $729 per month
with interest at .0% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
24,059
|
|
|
$
|
30,620
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $607 per month
with interest at .0% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
25,503
|
|
|
$
|
30,968
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $704 per month
with interest at .0% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
29,574
|
|
|
$
|
35,911
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $710 per month
with interest at .0% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
30,547
|
|
|
$
|
36,941
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $704 per month
with interest at .0% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
30,982
|
|
|
$
|
37,319
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $730 per month
with interest at .0% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
24,101
|
|
|
$
|
30,674
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $700 per month
with interest at .0% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
30,106
|
|
|
$
|
36,407
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $549 per month
with interest at .0% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
23,588
|
|
|
$
|
28,525
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $2,774 per
month with interest at 5.68% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
87,044
|
|
|
$
|
107,713
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $11,618 per
month with interest at 5.56% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
364,624
|
|
|
$
|
452,006
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $83,174 per
month with interest at 3.93% due 2013.
|
|
$
|
2,746,192
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $1,029 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
9,259
|
|
|
$
|
18,518
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $955 per month
with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
8,591
|
|
|
$
|
17,183
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $9,378 per
month with interest at .0% due 2009.
|
|
$
|
28,135
|
|
|
$
|
112,538
|
|
F-60
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $7,333 per
month with interest at .0% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
227,319
|
|
|
$
|
293,315
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $16,425 per
month with interest at .0% due 2011.
|
|
$
|
312,067
|
|
|
$
|
459,889
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $4,458 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
40,120
|
|
|
$
|
80,240
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $1,243 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
16,162
|
|
|
$
|
27,348
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $1,243 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
16,162
|
|
|
$
|
27,348
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $1,272 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
16,540
|
|
|
$
|
27,990
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $1,222 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
15,881
|
|
|
$
|
26,876
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $1,232 per
month with interest at .0% due 2010.
|
|
$
|
19,705
|
|
|
$
|
30,790
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $20,717 per
month with interest at 5.9% due 2011.
|
|
$
|
504,393
|
|
|
$
|
664,652
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $10,073 per
month with interest at 4.92% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
301,495
|
|
|
$
|
387,899
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable of $16,565 per
month with interest at 4.92% due 2012.
|
|
$
|
495,832
|
|
|
$
|
637,932
|
|
Contract payable secured by equipment payable in monthly
installments to reflect
1/3
principle payments in 2010 through 2012 with a variable interest
rate of 3.536% increasing to 3.965% by 2012.
|
|
$
|
1,309,670
|
|
|
$
|
1,309,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
$
|
6,876,021
|
|
|
$
|
5,117,393
|
|
LESS CURRENT PORTION
|
|
|
2,095,951
|
|
|
|
1,290,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LONG TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
$
|
4,780,070
|
|
|
$
|
3,827,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys long-term maturities for the next five years
as of September 30 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,095,951
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,290,011
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
2,396,328
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,601,092
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
1,901,054
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,384,624
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
482,688
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
815,617
|
|
2014 & after
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
2013 & after
|
|
$
|
26,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
6,876,021
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,117,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE C
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The Company rents an office building from a related party. The
building is located at 166 East 14000 South, Draper, Utah. The
rent for this location is $23,975 per month. The rate will
increase at 3% per year. The Company rents a shop on Dannon Way
from a related party and pays $12,000 per month.
The future lease payments as of September 30, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
431,700
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
440,311
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
449,221
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
458,378
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
467,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,247,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into a service agreement with Wadsworth
Development Group LLC, a Utah LLC, whose members are all related
parties. The LLC is in the business of developing real property
for retail, commercial, industrial
and/or
office uses. The Company has agreed to provide furnished office
space, support staff and support equipment. All rates are based
on fair market rates or actual costs. The term of the agreement
was for one year beginning, January 1, 2005 with additional
one year options. The option has been exercised for 2009.
The Company has several contracts totaling $4,342,116 and
$3,308,950 with backlog at $188,498 and $1,641,142 with related
parties as of September 30, 2009 and 2008. These are
handled in an arms length contract at cost and are subject to
normal construction draws. Related party contracts are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Contract
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
The Exchange Building E
|
|
$
|
2,153,640
|
|
|
$
|
3,329
|
|
|
$
|
2,134,813
|
|
|
$
|
986,092
|
|
Exchange Site Work
|
|
$
|
352,438
|
|
|
$
|
91,894
|
|
|
$
|
33,017
|
|
|
$
|
345,005
|
|
The Exchange Building D
|
|
$
|
1,836,038
|
|
|
$
|
93,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper Ridge Site Phase II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
341,120
|
|
|
$
|
310,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,342,116
|
|
|
$
|
188,498
|
|
|
$
|
3,308,950
|
|
|
$
|
1,641,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE D
|
UNCOMPLETED
CONTRACTS
|
Costs, estimated earnings, and billings for the nine months
period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expenditures on uncompleted contracts
|
|
$
|
253,234,819
|
|
|
$
|
181,929,310
|
|
Estimated earnings thereon
|
|
|
61,806,464
|
|
|
|
42,350,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,041,283
|
|
|
|
224,279,585
|
|
Billings to date
|
|
|
331,482,218
|
|
|
|
234,740,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,440,935
|
|
|
$
|
10,461,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
RALPH L.
WADSWORTH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Included in the accompanying balance sheet under the following
captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
$
|
1,470,285
|
|
|
$
|
2,720,275
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
17,911,220
|
|
|
|
13,181,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,440,935
|
|
|
$
|
10,461,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following schedule summarizes changes in backlog on
contracts during the nine month period ended September 30,
2009 and 2008. Backlog represents the amount of revenue the
Company expects to realize from work to be performed on
uncompleted contracts in progress at year end and from
contractual agreements on which work has not yet begun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog balance at January 1, 2009 and 2008
|
|
$
|
94,057,687
|
|
|
$
|
54,584,937
|
|
New contracts during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
217,031,186
|
|
|
|
136,983,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,088,873
|
|
|
|
191,568,479
|
|
Less contract revenue earned for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
112,257,256
|
|
|
|
94,112,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog balance at September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
$
|
198,831,617
|
|
|
$
|
97,455,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into no additional contracts between
October 1, 2009 and November 13, 2009.
|
|
NOTE F
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary
cash investments and trade accounts receivables. The Company
places its temporary cash investments with financial
institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one
financial institution. Concentrations of credit risk with
respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number
of customers comprising the Companys customer base and
their dispersion across different industries and geographic
areas. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had no
significant concentration of risk.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk Arising from Cash Deposits in Excess of Insured
Limits
The Company maintains cash balances at several financial
institutions located in Utah. Accounts at each institution are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to
$250,000 in 2009 and $100,000 in 2008. At September 30,
2009 and 2008, the Company has $10,252,567 and $19,949,735
uninsured cash balances.
F-63
PROSPECTUS
$80,000,000
Sterling Construction Company,
Inc.
Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Senior Debt
Securities
Subordinated Debt
Securities
Warrants
Units
Guarantees
By this prospectus, we may from time to time offer and sell in
one or more offerings up to an aggregate of $80,000,000 of the
following securities:
(1) shares of common stock;
(2) shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, which
may be convertible into or exchangeable for debt securities or
common stock;
(3) senior debt securities, which may be convertible into
or exchangeable for common stock or preferred stock;
(4) subordinated debt securities, which may be convertible
into or exchangeable for common stock or preferred stock;
(5) warrants to purchase common stock, preferred stock,
debt securities or units;
(6) units consisting of any combination of common stock,
preferred stock, debt securities or warrants; and/or
(7) guarantees of debt securities issued by Sterling
Construction Company, Inc.
This prospectus provides a general description of the securities
we may offer. Supplements to this prospectus will provide the
specific terms of the securities that we actually offer,
including the offering prices. You should carefully read this
prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement and any
information under the headings Where You Can Find More
Information and Incorporation by Reference
before you invest in any of these securities. This prospectus
may not be used to sell securities unless it is accompanied by a
prospectus supplement that describes those securities.
We may sell these securities to or through underwriters, to
other purchasers
and/or
through agents. Supplements to this prospectus will specify the
names of any underwriters or agents.
Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market under the symbol STRL.
Investing in our securities involves risks. Please read
Risk Factors beginning on page 2 of this
prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is August 4, 2008.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
utilizing a shelf registration process. Under this
shelf registration process, we may sell any of, or any
combination of, the securities described in this prospectus in
one or more offerings up to a total offering price of
$80,000,000. This prospectus provides you with a general
description of the securities we may offer. Each time we offer
to sell securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that
will contain specific information about the terms of that
offering and the securities offered by us in that offering. The
prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information
contained in this prospectus. If there is any inconsistency
between the information in this prospectus and any prospectus
supplement, you should rely on the information provided in the
prospectus supplement. This prospectus does not contain all of
the information included in the registration statement. The
registration statement filed with the SEC includes exhibits that
provide more details about the matters discussed in this
prospectus. You should carefully read this prospectus, the
related exhibits filed with the SEC and any prospectus
supplement, together with the additional information described
below under the headings Where You Can Find More
Information.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus or in any related
free writing prospectus filed with the SEC and used or referred
to in an offering to you of these securities. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If
anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. We are offering to sell, and seeking
offers to buy, our securities only in jurisdictions where offers
and sales are permitted. The information contained in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus,
regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any
sale of our securities. Our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects may have changed since that
date.
i
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
As used in this prospectus, all references to
Sterling, Sterling Construction,
SCC, we, us and
our refer to Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and
its subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or indicated by
context.
We are a leading heavy civil construction company that
specializes in the building, reconstruction and repair of
transportation and water infrastructure. Transportation
infrastructure projects include highways, roads, bridges and
light rail. Water infrastructure projects include water,
wastewater and storm drainage systems. Sterling provides general
contracting services primarily to public sector clients
utilizing its own employees and equipment, including excavating,
concrete and asphalt paving, installation of large-diameter
water and wastewater distribution systems; construction of
bridges and similar large structures; construction of light rail
infrastructure; concrete batch plant operations, concrete
crushing and aggregates. We operate in Texas and Nevada.
Sterling performs the majority of the work required by its
contracts with its own crews, and generally engages
subcontractors only for ancillary services.
Our
Executive Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 20810 Fernbush
Lane, Houston, Texas 77073, and our telephone number at this
address is (281) 821 9091. Our website is
www.sterlingconstructionco.com. Information on, or
accessible through, this website is not a part of, and is not
incorporated into, this prospectus.
1
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves various risks.
Before making an investment in our securities, you should
carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other
information contained in this prospectus. The risks described
below are those we believe to be the material risks we face. Any
of the risk factors described below could significantly and
adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition
and results of operations. As a result, the trading price of our
securities could decline, and you could lose a part or all of
your investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
If we
are unable to accurately estimate the overall risks or costs
when we bid on a contract that is ultimately awarded to us, we
may achieve a lower than anticipated profit or incur a loss on
the contract.
Substantially all of our revenues and backlog are typically
derived from fixed unit price contracts. Fixed unit price
contracts require us to perform the contract for a fixed unit
price irrespective of our actual costs. As a result, we realize
a profit on these contracts only if we successfully estimate our
costs and then successfully control actual costs and avoid cost
overruns. If our cost estimates for a contract are inaccurate,
or if we do not execute the contract within our cost estimates,
then cost overruns may cause us to incur losses or cause the
contract not to be as profitable as we expected. This, in turn,
could negatively affect our cash flow, earnings and financial
position.
The costs incurred and gross profit realized on such contracts
can vary, sometimes substantially, from the original projections
due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
onsite conditions that differ from those assumed in the original
bid;
|
|
|
|
delays caused by weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
contract modifications creating unanticipated costs not covered
by change orders;
|
|
|
|
our suppliers or subcontractors failure to perform;
|
|
|
|
changes in availability, proximity and costs of materials,
including steel, concrete, aggregates and other construction
materials (such as stone, gravel, sand and oil for asphalt
paving), as well as fuel and lubricants for our equipment;
|
|
|
|
inability to predict the costs of accessing and producing
aggregates, and purchasing oil, required for asphalt paving
projects;
|
|
|
|
availability, cost and skill level of workers in the geographic
location of a project;
|
|
|
|
fraud or theft committed by our employees;
|
|
|
|
mechanical problems with our machinery or equipment;
|
|
|
|
citations issued by any governmental authority, including the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining required governmental permits or
approvals;
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws and regulations; and
|
|
|
|
claims or demands from third parties alleging damages arising
from our work or from the project of which our work is part.
|
Many of our contracts with public sector customers contain
provisions that purport to shift some or all of the above risks
from the customer to us, even in cases where the customer is
partly at fault. Our experience has often been that public
sector customers have been willing to negotiate equitable
adjustments in the contract compensation or completion time
provisions if unexpected circumstances arise. If public sector
customers seek to impose contractual risk-shifting provisions
more aggressively, we could face increased risks, which may
adversely affect our cash flow, earnings and financial position.
2
Economic
downturns or reductions in government funding of infrastructure
projects could reduce our revenues and profits and have a
material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Our business is highly dependent on the amount and timing of
infrastructure work funded by various governmental entities,
which, in turn, depends on the overall condition of the economy,
the need for new or replacement infrastructure, the priorities
placed on various projects funded by governmental entities and
federal, state or local government spending levels. Spending on
infrastructure could decline for numerous reasons, including
decreased revenues received by state and local governments for
spending on such projects, including federal funding. For
example, state spending on highway and other projects can be
adversely affected by decreases or delays in, or uncertainties
regarding, federal highway funding, which could adversely affect
us. We are reliant upon contracts with the Texas Department of
Transportation, or TXDOT, and the Nevada Department of
Transportation, or NDOT, for a significant portion of our
revenues. Recent public statements by TXDOT officials indicate
potential TXDOT funding shortfalls and reductions in spending.
In addition, the recent nationwide declines in home sales and
increases in foreclosures could adversely affect expenditures by
state and local governments. Decreases in government funding of
infrastructure projects could decrease the number of civil
construction contracts available and limit our ability to obtain
new contracts, which could reduce our revenues and profits.
The
cancellation of significant contracts could reduce our revenues
and profits and have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Contracts that we enter into with governmental entities can
usually be canceled at any time by them with payment only for
the work already completed. In addition, we could be prohibited
from bidding on certain governmental contracts if we fail to
maintain qualifications required by those entities. A sudden
cancellation of a contract or our debarment from the bidding
process could cause our equipment and work crews to remain idled
for a significant period of time until other comparable work
became available, which could have a material adverse effect on
our business and results of operations.
We
operate in Texas and Nevada, and any adverse change to the
economy or business environment in Texas or Nevada could
significantly affect our operations, which would lead to lower
revenues and reduced profitability.
We operate in Texas and Nevada. Our Texas operations are
concentrated in the Houston, Dallas/Ft. Worth and
San Antonio/Austin areas, while our Nevada operations are
concentrated in Northern Nevada and the Las Vegas areas. Because
of this concentration in specific geographic locations, we are
susceptible to fluctuations in our business caused by adverse
economic or other conditions in these regions, including natural
or other disasters. A stagnant or depressed economy in Texas or
Nevada could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our
acquisition strategy involves a number of risks.
In addition to organic growth of our construction business, we
intend to continue pursuing growth through the acquisition of
companies or assets that may enable us to expand our project
skill-sets and capabilities, enlarge our geographic markets, add
experienced management and increase critical mass to enable us
to bid on larger contracts. However, we may be unable to
implement this growth strategy if we cannot reach agreements for
potential acquisitions on acceptable terms or for other reasons.
Moreover, our acquisition strategy involves certain risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the integration of operations and systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulties applying our expertise in one market into another
market;
|
|
|
|
the key personnel and customers of the acquired company may
terminate their relationships with the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
we may experience additional financial and accounting challenges
and complexities in areas such as tax planning and financial
reporting;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
we may assume or be held liable for risks and liabilities
(including for environmental-related costs and liabilities) as a
result of our acquisitions, some of which we may not discover
during our due diligence;
|
|
|
|
our ongoing business may be disrupted or receive insufficient
management attention; and
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to realize cost savings or other financial
benefits we anticipated.
|
Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity
or debt financing, as well as additional surety bonding
capacity, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us
or at all. Moreover, to the extent that any acquisition results
in additional goodwill, it will reduce our tangible net worth,
which might have an adverse effect on our credit and bonding
capacity.
Our
industry is highly competitive, with a variety of larger
companies with greater resources competing with us, and our
failure to compete effectively could reduce the number of new
contracts awarded to us or adversely affect our margins on
contracts awarded.
Essentially all of the contracts on which we bid are awarded
through a competitive bid process, with awards generally being
made to the lowest bidder, but sometimes recognizing other
factors, such as shorter contract schedules or prior experience
with the customer. Within our markets, we compete with many
national, regional and local construction firms. Some of these
competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we
have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater
financial and other resources than we do. In addition, there are
a number of national companies in our industry that are larger
than we are and that, if they so desire, could establish a
presence in our markets and compete with us for contracts. In
some markets where home building projects have slowed,
construction companies that lack available work in the
construction of residential
sub-division
infrastructure have begun on a limited scale bidding on highway
and municipal construction contracts. As a result, we may need
to accept lower contract margins in order to compete against
competitors that have the incentive to accept awards at lower
prices or have a pre-existing relationship with a customer. If
we are unable to compete successfully in our markets, our
relative market share and profits could be reduced.
Our
dependence on subcontractors and suppliers of materials and
petroleum-based products could increase our costs and impair our
ability to complete contracts on a timely basis or at all, which
would adversely affect our profits and cash flow.
We rely on third-party subcontractors to perform some of the
work on many of our contracts. We generally do not bid on
contracts unless we have the necessary subcontractors committed
for the anticipated scope of the contract and at prices that we
have included in our bid. Therefore, to the extent that we
cannot engage subcontractors, our ability to bid for contracts
may be impaired. In addition, if a subcontractor is unable to
deliver its services according to the negotiated terms for any
reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition,
we may suffer delays and be required to purchase the services
from another source at a higher price. This may reduce the
profit to be realized, or result in a loss, on a contract.
We also rely on third-party suppliers to provide most of the
materials (including aggregates, concrete, steel and pipe) for
our contracts, except in Nevada where we source and produce most
of our own aggregates. We do not own or operate any quarries in
Texas, and there are no naturally occurring sources of
aggregates in the Houston metropolitan area. We normally do not
bid on contracts unless we have commitments from suppliers for
the materials required to complete the contract and at prices
that we have included in our bid, except for some aggregates we
use in our Nevada construction projects. Thus, to the extent
that we cannot obtain commitments from our suppliers for
materials, our ability to bid for contracts may be impaired. In
addition, if a supplier is unable or otherwise fails to deliver
materials according to the negotiated terms of a supply
agreement for any reason, including the deterioration of its
financial condition or increased costs of the materials, we may
suffer delays and be required to purchase the materials from
another source at a higher price. This may reduce the profit to
be realized, or result in a loss, on a contract.
Diesel fuel and other petroleum-based products are utilized to
operate the plants and equipment on which we rely to perform our
construction contracts. In addition, our asphalt plants and
suppliers use oil in
4
combination with aggregates to produce asphalt used in our road
and highway construction projects. Decreased supplies of such
products relative to demand, unavailability of petroleum
supplies due to refinery turnarounds, and other factors can
increase the cost of such products. We fix the price of oil used
in asphalt production through supplier contracts, but we do not
fix the price of diesel fuel and other petroleum-based products
used for other purposes in our business. Future increases in the
costs of fuel and other petroleum-based products used in our
business, particularly if a bid has been submitted for a
contract and the costs of such products have been estimated at
amounts less than the actual costs thereof, could result in a
lower profit, or a loss, on a contract.
We may
not accurately assess the quality, and we may not accurately
estimate the quantity, availability and cost, of aggregates we
plan to produce, particularly for projects in rural areas of
Nevada, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Particularly for projects in rural areas of Nevada, we typically
estimate these factors for anticipated aggregate sources that we
have not previously used to produce aggregates, which increases
the risk that our estimates may be inaccurate. Inaccuracies in
our estimates regarding aggregates could result in significantly
higher costs to supply aggregates needed for our projects, as
well as potential delays and other inefficiencies. As a result,
our failure to accurately assess the quality, quantity,
availability and cost of aggregates could cause us to incur
losses, which could materially adversely affect our results of
operations.
We may
not be able to fully realize the revenue anticipated by our
reported backlog.
Almost all of the contracts included in backlog are awarded by
public sector customers through a competitive bid process, with
the award generally being made to the lowest bidder. We add new
contracts to our backlog, typically when we are the low bidder
on a public sector contract and management determines that there
are no apparent impediments to award of the contract. As
construction on our contracts progresses, we increase or
decrease backlog to take into account changes in estimated
quantities under fixed unit price contracts, as well as to
reflect changed conditions, change orders and other variations
from initially anticipated contract revenues and costs,
including completion penalties and bonuses. We subtract from
backlog the amounts we bill on contracts.
Most of the contracts with our public sector customers can be
terminated at their discretion. If a customer cancels, suspends,
delays or reduces a contract, we may be reimbursed for certain
costs but typically will not be able to bill the total amount
that had been reflected in our backlog. Cancellation of one or
more contracts that constitute a large percentage of our
backlog, and our inability to find a substitute contract, would
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel and skilled
labor, or if we encounter labor difficulties, our ability to bid
for and successfully complete contracts may be negatively
impacted.
Our ability to attract and retain reliable, qualified personnel
is a significant factor that enables us to successfully bid for
and profitably complete our work. This includes members of our
management, project managers, estimators, supervisors, foremen,
equipment operators and laborers. The loss of the services of
any of our management could have a material adverse effect on
us. Our future success will also depend on our ability to hire
and retain, or to attract when needed, highly-skilled personnel.
Competition for these employees is intense, and we could
experience difficulty hiring and retaining the personnel
necessary to support our business. If we do not succeed in
retaining our current employees and attracting, developing and
retaining new highly-skilled employees, our reputation may be
harmed and our future earnings may be negatively impacted.
In Texas, we rely heavily on immigrant labor. Any adverse
changes to existing laws and regulations, or changes in
enforcement requirements or practices, applicable to employment
of immigrants could negatively impact the availability and cost
of the skilled personnel and labor we need, particularly in
Texas. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain
sufficient employees at all levels due to changes in immigration
enforcement practices or compliance standards or for other
reasons.
5
In Nevada, a substantial number of our equipment operators and
laborers are unionized. Any work stoppage or other labor dispute
involving our unionized workforce would have a material adverse
effect on our operations and operating results in Nevada.
Our
contracts may require us to perform extra or change order work,
which can result in disputes and adversely affect our working
capital, profits and cash flows.
Our contracts generally require us to perform extra or change
order work as directed by the customer even if the customer has
not agreed in advance on the scope or price of the extra work to
be performed. This process may result in disputes over whether
the work performed is beyond the scope of the work included in
the original project plans and specifications or, if the
customer agrees that the work performed qualifies as extra work,
the price that the customer is willing to pay for the extra
work. These disputes may not be settled to our satisfaction.
Even when the customer agrees to pay for the extra work, we may
be required to fund the cost of such work for a lengthy period
of time until the change order is approved by the customer and
we are paid by the customer.
To the extent that actual recoveries with respect to change
orders or amounts subject to contract disputes or claims are
less than the estimates used in our financial statements, the
amount of any shortfall will reduce our future revenues and
profits, and this could have a material adverse effect on our
reported working capital and results of operations. In addition,
any delay caused by the extra work may adversely impact the
timely scheduling of other project work and our ability to meet
specified contract milestone dates.
Our
failure to meet schedule or performance requirements of our
contracts could adversely affect us.
In most cases, our contracts require completion by a scheduled
acceptance date. Failure to meet any such schedule could result
in additional costs, penalties or liquidated damages being
assessed against us, and these could exceed projected profit
margins on the contract. Performance problems on existing and
future contracts could cause actual results of operations to
differ materially from those anticipated by us and could cause
us to suffer damage to our reputation within the industry and
among our customers.
Unanticipated
adverse weather conditions may cause delays, which could slow
completion of our contracts and negatively affect our current
and future revenues and cash flow.
Because all of our construction projects are built outdoors,
work on our contracts is subject to unpredictable weather
conditions, which could become more frequent or severe if
general climatic changes occur. For example, evacuations in
Texas due to Hurricane Rita resulted in our inability to perform
work on all Houston-area contracts for several days. Lengthy
periods of wet weather will generally interrupt construction,
and this can lead to under-utilization of crews and equipment,
resulting in less efficient rates of overhead recovery. For
example, during the first nine months of 2007, we experienced an
above-average number of days and amount of rainfall across our
Texas markets, which impeded our ability to work on construction
projects and reduced our gross profit. During the late fall to
early spring months of the year, our work on construction
projects in Nevada may also be curtailed because of snow and
other work-limiting weather. While revenues can be recovered
following a period of bad weather, it is generally impossible to
recover the inefficiencies, and significant periods of bad
weather typically reduce profitability of affected contracts
both in the current period and during the future life of
affected contracts. Such reductions in contract profitability
negatively affect our results of operations in current and
future periods until the affected contracts are completed.
Timing
of the award and performance of new contracts could have an
adverse effect on our operating results and cash
flow.
It is generally very difficult to predict whether and when new
contracts will be offered for tender, as these contracts
frequently involve a lengthy and complex design and bidding
process, which is affected by a number of factors, such as
market conditions, financing arrangements and governmental
approvals. Because of these factors, our results of operations
and cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to
year, and the fluctuation may be substantial.
6
The uncertainty of the timing of contract awards may also
present difficulties in matching the size of our equipment fleet
and work crews with contract needs. In some cases, we may
maintain and bear the cost of more equipment and ready work
crews than are currently required, in anticipation of future
needs for existing contracts or expected future contracts. If a
contract is delayed or an expected contract award is not
received, we would incur costs that could have a material
adverse effect on our anticipated profit.
In addition, the timing of the revenues, earnings and cash flows
from our contracts can be delayed by a number of factors,
including adverse weather conditions such as prolonged or
intense periods of rain, snow, storms or flooding, delays in
receiving material and equipment from suppliers and changes in
the scope of work to be performed. Such delays, if they occur,
could have adverse effects on our operating results for current
and future periods until the affected contracts are completed.
Our
dependence on a limited number of customers could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Due to the size and nature of our construction contracts, one or
a few customers have in the past and may in the future represent
a substantial portion of our consolidated revenues and gross
profits in any one year or over a period of several consecutive
years. For example, in 2007, approximately 78% of our revenue
was generated from three customers, and approximately 97% of
Road and Highway Builders LLCs, or RHBs, revenue was
generated from one customer. Similarly, our backlog frequently
reflects multiple contracts for individual customers; therefore,
one customer may comprise a significant percentage of backlog at
a certain point in time. An example of this is TXDOT, with which
we had 23 contracts representing an aggregate of approximately
47% of our backlog at December 31, 2007. The loss of
business from any one of such customers could have a material
adverse effect on our business or results of operations. Recent
public statements by TXDOT officials indicate potential TXDOT
funding shortfalls and reductions in spending. Because we do not
maintain any reserves for payment defaults, a default or delay
in payment on a significant scale could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We may
incur higher costs to lease, acquire and maintain equipment
necessary for our operations, and the market value of our owned
equipment may decline.
We have traditionally owned most of the construction equipment
used to build our projects. To the extent that we are unable to
buy construction equipment necessary for our needs, either due
to a lack of available funding or equipment shortages in the
marketplace, we may be forced to rent equipment on a short-term
basis, which could increase the costs of performing our
contracts.
The equipment that we own or lease requires continuous
maintenance, for which we maintain our own repair facilities. If
we are unable to continue to maintain the equipment in our
fleet, we may be forced to obtain third-party repair services,
which could increase our costs. In addition, the market value of
our equipment may unexpectedly decline at a faster rate than
anticipated. Such a decline could reduce the amount of credit
available to us and impede our ability to continue to expand our
business.
An
inability to obtain bonding could limit the aggregate dollar
amount of contracts that we are able to pursue.
As is customary in the construction business, we are required to
provide surety bonds to secure our performance under
construction contracts. Our ability to obtain surety bonds
primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past
performance, management expertise and reputation and certain
external factors, including the overall capacity of the surety
market. Surety companies consider such factors in relationship
to the amount of our backlog and their underwriting standards,
which may change from time to time. Events that affect the
insurance and bonding markets generally may result in bonding
becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or being
available only at a significantly greater cost. Our inability to
obtain adequate bonding to bid on new contracts could have a
material adverse effect on our future revenues and business
prospects.
7
Our
operations are subject to hazards that may cause personal injury
or property damage, thereby subjecting us to liabilities and
possible losses, which may not be covered by
insurance.
Our workers are subject to the usual hazards associated with
providing construction and related services on construction
sites, plants and quarries. Operating hazards can cause personal
injury and loss of life, damage to or destruction of property,
plant and equipment and environmental damage. We self-insure our
workers compensation claims, subject to stop-loss
insurance coverage. We also maintain insurance coverage in
amounts and against the risks that we believe are consistent
with industry practice, but this insurance may not be adequate
to cover all losses or liabilities that we may incur in our
operations.
The amount of personal injury and property damage liabilities
that we may incur is difficult to assess and quantify due to
various factors, including the severity of an injury, the
determination of our liability in proportion to other parties,
the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of
our safety program. If we were to experience claims or costs
above our estimates of amounts covered by insurance, we might be
required to use working capital to satisfy these claims rather
than to maintain or expand our operations. To the extent that we
experience a material increase in the frequency or severity of
accidents or workers compensation claims, or unfavorable
developments on existing claims, our operating results and
financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Environmental
and other regulatory matters could adversely affect our ability
to conduct our business and could require expenditures that
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and
regulations relating to the management, disposal and remediation
of hazardous substances and the emission and discharge of
pollutants into the air and water. We could be held liable for
such contamination created not only from our own activities but
also from the historical activities of others on our project
sites or on properties that we acquire or lease. Our operations
are also subject to laws and regulations relating to workplace
safety and worker health, which, among other things, regulate
employee exposure to hazardous substances. Immigration laws
require us to take certain steps intended to confirm the legal
status of our immigrant labor force, but we may nonetheless
unknowingly employ illegal immigrants. Violations of such laws
and regulations could subject us to substantial fines and
penalties, cleanup costs, third-party property damage or
personal injury claims. In addition, these laws and regulations
have become, and enforcement practices and compliance standards
are becoming, increasingly stringent. Moreover, we cannot
predict the nature, scope or effect of legislation or regulatory
requirements that could be imposed, or how existing or future
laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, with
respect to products or activities to which they have not been
previously applied. Compliance with more stringent laws or
regulations, as well as more vigorous enforcement policies of
the regulatory agencies, could require us to make substantial
expenditures for, among other things, pollution control systems
and other equipment that we do not currently possess, or the
acquisition or modification of permits applicable to our
activities.
Our aggregate quarry lease in Nevada could subject us to costs
and liabilities. As lessee and operator of the quarry, we could
be held responsible for any contamination or regulatory
violations resulting from activities or operations at the
quarry. Any such costs and liabilities could be significant and
could materially and adversely affect our business, operating
results and financial condition.
We may
be unable to sustain our historical revenue growth
rate.
Our revenue has grown rapidly in recent years. However, we may
be unable to sustain these recent revenue growth rates for a
variety of reasons, including limits on additional growth in our
current markets, less success in competitive bidding for
contracts, limitations on access to necessary working capital
and investment capital to sustain growth, limitations on access
to bonding to support increased contracts and operations,
inability to hire and retain essential personnel and to acquire
equipment to support growth, and inability to identify
acquisition candidates and successfully acquire and integrate
them into our business. A decline in our
8
revenue growth could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations if we are unable
to reduce the growth of our operating expenses at the same rate.
Terrorist
attacks have impacted, and could continue to negatively impact,
the U.S. economy and the markets in which we
operate.
Terrorist attacks, like those that occurred on
September 11, 2001, have contributed to economic
instability in the United States, and further acts of terrorism,
violence or war could affect the markets in which we operate,
our business and our expectations. Armed hostilities may
increase, or terrorist attacks, or responses from the United
States, may lead to further acts of terrorism and civil
disturbances in the United States or elsewhere, which may
further contribute to economic instability in the United States.
These attacks or armed conflicts may affect our operations or
those of our customers or suppliers and could impact our
revenues, our production capability and our ability to complete
contracts in a timely manner.
Risks
Related to Our Financial Results and Financing Plans
Actual
results could differ from the estimates and assumptions that we
use to prepare our financial statements.
To prepare financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions, as of the date of the financial
statements, which affect the reported values of assets and
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant
estimates by our management include: contract costs and profits
and application of
percentage-of-completion
accounting and revenue recognition of contract change order
claims; provisions for uncollectible receivables and customer
claims and recoveries of costs from subcontractors, suppliers
and others; valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in connection with business combinations; and accruals for
estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance
reserves. Our actual results could differ from, and could
require adjustments to, those estimates.
In particular, we recognize contract revenue using the
percentage-of-completion
method. Under this method, estimated contract revenue is
recognized by applying the percentage of completion of the
contract for the period to the total estimated revenue for the
contract. The estimated percentage of completion is based on the
amount of costs incurred on a contract compared to the estimated
total cost for that contract. Estimated contract losses are
recognized in full when determined. Contract revenue and total
cost estimates are reviewed and revised on a continuous basis as
the work progresses and as change orders are initiated or
approved, and adjustments based upon the percentage of
completion are reflected in contract revenue in the accounting
period when these estimates are revised. To the extent that
these adjustments result in an increase, a reduction or an
elimination of previously reported contract profit, we recognize
a credit or a charge against current earnings, which could be
material.
We may
need to raise additional capital in the future for working
capital, capital expenditures and/or acquisitions, and we may
not be able to do so on favorable terms or at all, which would
impair our ability to operate our business or achieve our growth
objectives.
Our growth has been funded by cash flow from operations,
borrowings under our credit facility and sales of capital stock.
Our cash flow from operations has been increased in part by our
utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards, or NOLs, to
reduce the amounts that we have paid for income taxes. We expect
our NOLs to be fully utilized and to only partially offset our
taxes payable in 2008. Paying taxes in 2008 and thereafter will
reduce cash flows from operations compared to prior periods, as
we will be required to fund the payment of taxes in 2008 and
future periods. To the extent that cash flow from operations is
insufficient to fund future investments, make acquisitions or
provide needed additional working capital, we may require
additional financing from other sources of funds.
Our ability to obtain such additional financing in the future
will depend in part upon prevailing capital market conditions,
as well as conditions in our business and our operating results;
such factors may adversely affect our efforts to arrange
additional financing on terms satisfactory to us. We have
pledged the proceeds
9
and other rights under our construction contracts to our bond
surety, and we have pledged substantially all of our other
assets as collateral in connection with our credit facility and
mortgage debt. As a result, we may have difficulty in obtaining
additional financing in the future if such financing requires us
to pledge assets as collateral. In addition, under our credit
facility, we must obtain the consent of our lenders to incur any
amount of additional debt from other sources (subject to certain
exceptions). If future financing is obtained by the issuance of
additional shares of common stock, our stockholders may suffer
dilution. If adequate funds are not available, or are not
available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to make future
investments, take advantage of acquisitions or other
opportunities, or respond to competitive challenges.
We are
subject to financial and other covenants under our credit
facility that could limit our flexibility in managing our
business.
We have a revolving credit facility that restricts us from
engaging in certain activities, including restrictions on the
ability (subject to certain exceptions) to:
|
|
|
|
|
make distributions and dividends;
|
|
|
|
incur liens or encumbrances;
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
guarantee obligations;
|
|
|
|
dispose of a material portion of assets or otherwise engage in a
merger with a third party;
|
|
|
|
make acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
incur losses for two consecutive quarters.
|
Our credit facility contains financial covenants that require us
to maintain specified fixed charge coverage ratios, asset ratios
and leverage ratios, and to maintain specified levels of
tangible net worth. Our ability to borrow funds for any purpose
will depend on our satisfying these tests. If we are unable to
meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with
any of the other restrictions contained in our credit facility,
an event of default could occur. An event of default, if not
waived by our lenders, could result in the acceleration of any
outstanding indebtedness, causing such debt to become
immediately due and payable. If such an acceleration occurs, we
may not be able to repay such indebtedness on a timely basis.
Acceleration of our credit facility could result in foreclosure
on and loss of our operating assets. In the event of such
foreclosure, we would be unable to conduct our business and
forced to discontinue operations.
10
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes statements that are, or may be
considered to be, forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
These forward-looking statements are included throughout this
prospectus and in the documents incorporated herein by reference
and relate to matters such as our industry, business strategy,
goals and expectations concerning our market position, future
operations, margins, profitability, capital expenditures,
liquidity and capital resources and other financial and
operating information. We have used the words
anticipate, assume, believe,
budget, continue, could,
estimate, expect, forecast,
future, intend, may,
plan, potential, predict,
project, should, will,
would and similar terms and phrases to identify
forward-looking statements in this prospectus.
Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations
regarding future events, results or outcomes. These expectations
may or may not be realized. Some of these expectations may be
based upon assumptions or judgments that prove to be incorrect.
In addition, our business and operations involve numerous risks
and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, that
could result in our expectations not being realized or otherwise
could materially affect our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from
our expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not
possible to identify all of these factors, they include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions and resulting reductions
or delays, or uncertainties regarding governmental funding for
infrastructure services;
|
|
|
|
adverse economic conditions in our markets in Texas and Nevada;
|
|
|
|
delays or difficulties related to the commencement or completion
of contracts, including additional costs, reductions in revenues
or the payment of completion penalties or liquidated damages;
|
|
|
|
actions of suppliers, subcontractors, customers, competitors and
others which are beyond our control;
|
|
|
|
the estimates inherent in our
percentage-of-completion
accounting policies;
|
|
|
|
possible cost increases;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on a few significant customers;
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
the presence of competitors with greater financial resources
than we have and the impact of competitive services and pricing;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate
acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed in more detail under the heading
Risk Factors.
|
In reading this prospectus and the documents incorporated herein
by reference, you should consider these factors carefully in
evaluating any forward-looking statements and you are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in, or suggested by, the forward-looking statements
that we make in this prospectus are reasonable, we can provide
no assurance that they will be achieved.
The forward-looking statements included in this prospectus and
in the documents incorporated herein by reference are made only
as of the date of this prospectus or as of the date of the
document incorporated herein by reference, as applicable, and we
do not undertake to update any information contained in this
prospectus or incorporated herein by reference or to publicly
release the results of any revisions to any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur, or
that we become aware of after the date of this prospectus,
except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
11
USE OF
PROCEEDS
Unless otherwise specified in an accompanying prospectus
supplement, we expect to use the net proceeds from the sale of
the securities offered by this prospectus to fund:
|
|
|
|
|
working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
capital expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
other expenditures related to general corporate purposes,
including possible future acquisitions.
|
The actual application of proceeds from the sale of any
particular tranche of securities issued hereunder will be
described in the applicable prospectus supplement relating to
such tranche of securities. We may invest funds not required
immediately for these purposes in marketable securities and
short-term investments. The precise amount and timing of the
application of these proceeds will depend upon our funding
requirements and the availability and cost of other funds.
RATIOS OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The following table sets forth our ratios of earnings to fixed
charges on a consolidated basis for the periods shown. You
should read these ratios of earnings to fixed charges in
connection with our consolidated financial statements, including
the notes to those statements, incorporated by reference into
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges, earnings are defined as net income from continuing
operations before fixed charges less capitalized interest. Fixed
charges consist of interest (whether expensed or capitalized)
and related amortization of capitalized interest and interest
included in rent. |
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 19,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share, the rights and preferences of which may be established
from time to time by our board of directors. The following
description of our capital stock is only a summary, does not
purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified by our
restated and amended certificate of incorporation, as amended
(or, our certificate of incorporation), and amended and restated
bylaws, which are included as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and by the
provisions of applicable Delaware law.
Common
Stock
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share on all matters voted upon by our stockholders, including
the election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting
rights. Subject to the rights of holders of any then outstanding
shares of our preferred stock, our common stockholders are
entitled to receive ratably any dividends that may be declared
by our board of directors out of funds legally available
therefor. Holders of our common stock are entitled to share
ratably in our net assets upon our dissolution or liquidation
after payment or provision for all liabilities and any
preferential liquidation rights of our preferred stock then
outstanding. Holders of our common stock do not have preemptive
rights to purchase shares of our stock. The shares of our common
stock are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not
convertible into any other shares of our capital stock. The
rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our common
stock will be subject to those of the holders of any shares of
our preferred stock we may issue in the future.
12
Preferred
Stock
Our board of directors may, from time to time, authorize the
issuance of one or more classes or series of preferred stock
without stockholder approval. We have no current intention to
issue any shares of preferred stock.
Our certificate of incorporation permits us to issue up to
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock from time to time.
Subject to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation
and limitations prescribed by law, our board of directors is
authorized to adopt resolutions to issue shares, establish the
number of shares and provide or change the voting powers,
designations, preferences and relative rights, qualifications,
limitations or restrictions on shares of our preferred stock,
including dividend rights, terms of redemption, conversion
rights and liquidation preferences, in each case without any
action or vote by our stockholders.
The issuance of preferred stock may adversely affect the rights
of our common stockholders by, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
restricting dividends on the common stock;
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the common stock;
|
|
|
|
impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; or
|
|
|
|
delaying or preventing a change in control without further
action by the stockholders.
|
As a result of these or other factors, the issuance of preferred
stock could have an adverse impact on the market price of our
common stock.
Preferred
Stock Purchase Rights
In December 1998, we entered into a rights agreement with
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
rights agent, providing for a dividend of one purchase right for
each outstanding share of our common stock. We issued the
dividend to stockholders of record on December 29, 1998 and
holders of shares of common stock issued since that date are
issued rights with their shares. The rights trade automatically
with shares of common stock and become exercisable only under
the circumstances described below. The rights are designed to
protect the interests of SCC and our stockholders against
coercive tactics by encouraging potential acquirers to negotiate
with the board of directors of SCC prior to attempting a
takeover and to provide the board with leverage in negotiating
on behalf of all stockholders the terms of any proposed
takeover. The rights may have anti-takeover effects but the
rights are not intended to prevent a takeover of SCC.
Until a right is exercised, the rights will not entitle the
holder to additional rights as an SCC stockholder, including,
without limitation, the right to vote or to receive dividends.
Upon becoming exercisable, each right will entitle its holder to
purchase from us one one-hundredth of a share of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $10
per one one-hundredth of a share, subject to adjustment. In
general, the rights will become exercisable upon the earlier of:
(i) the tenth day after a person or group of affiliated or
associated persons (an acquiring person) publicly
announces that he, she or it has acquired, or has obtained the
right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 4.5% or more of our
outstanding common stock, or (ii) 10 business days (or such
later date as may be determined by action of SCCs board of
directors taken prior to a person or group becoming an acquiring
person) following the commencement or announcement of a tender
offer or exchange offer, the consummation of which would result
in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 4.5% or more
of the outstanding common stock. The earlier of such dates is
referred to as the distribution date. In the event
that, after the distribution date occurs and a person or group
becomes an acquiring person, (i) SCC is acquired in a
merger or other business combination transaction, or
(ii) 50% or more of our consolidated assets or earning
power are sold, proper provision must be made so that each
holder of a right that has not theretofore been exercised,
exchanged or redeemed (other than rights beneficially owned by
the acquiring person, which will thereafter be void) will
thereafter have the right to receive, upon exercise, shares of
common stock of the acquiring company having a value equal to
two times the purchase price.
13
Any rights that are at any time beneficially owned by an
acquiring person, or any associate or affiliate of the acquiring
person, will be null and void and nontransferable, and any
holder of such right, including any purported transferee or
subsequent holder, will be unable to exercise or transfer the
right.
The rights will expire on December 29, 2008, unless
redeemed or exchanged prior to that time. At any time on or
prior to the earlier of (i) the time a person or group
becomes an acquiring person and (ii) the expiration date,
we may redeem the rights in whole, but not in part, at a price
of $0.001 per right.
The preceding summary is not complete and is not intended to
give full effect to provisions of statutory or common law. You
should refer to the applicable provisions of the rights
agreement and the form of rights certificate, which are
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our
Form 8-A
filed with the SEC on January 5, 1999.
Provisions
of Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our certificate of incorporation prohibits the transfer (other
than by SCC or with the consent of our board of directors) of
our common stock to any person who, after taking into
consideration such transfer, would own more than 4.5% of our
outstanding common stock. Any purported transfer to the contrary
will not be effective. Prohibiting a person from acquiring more
than 4.5% of our common stock might impact a persons
decision to purchase our voting securities in an attempt to
cause a change in control of SCC.
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, the power
to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws is conferred upon the
stockholders. A corporation may, however, in its certificate of
incorporation also confer upon the board of directors the power
to adopt, amend or repeal its bylaws. Our certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws grant our board
the power to adopt, amend and repeal our bylaws on the
affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office.
Our stockholders may adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws but only
at any regular or special meeting of stockholders by the holders
of not less than 75% of the voting power of all outstanding
voting stock.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that our board of
directors will be divided into three classes of directors, with
the classes to be as nearly equal in number as possible. As a
result, approximately one-third of our board of directors will
be elected each year. The classification of directors has the
effect of making it more difficult for stockholders to change
the composition of our board.
When there is a classified board of directors, the DGCL provides
that stockholders may remove directors only for cause, unless a
companys certificate of incorporation otherwise provides.
Our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
do not permit the removal of directors other than for cause.
Such requirement may deter third parties from making a tender
offer or acquiring our common stock through open market
purchases in order to obtain control of us because they could
not use their acquired voting power to remove existing directors.
Our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called
only by our board of directors. Stockholders are prohibited from
calling special meetings. Eliminating the ability of
stockholders to call a special meeting may result in delaying
expensive proxy contests until our annual stockholders meeting,
which might impact a persons decision to purchase our
voting securities in an attempt to cause a change in control of
SCC.
Our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
provide that stockholders may take action only at an annual or
special meeting of the stockholders. Stockholders may not act by
written consent. Eliminating the ability for stockholders to act
by written consent could lengthen the amount of time required to
take stockholder actions, which will ensure that stockholders
will have sufficient time to weigh the arguments presented by
both sides in connection with any contested stockholder vote,
thereby potentially discouraging, delaying or preventing a
change in control of SCC.
Although Section 214 of the DGCL provides that a
corporations certificate of incorporation may provide for
cumulative voting for directors, our certificate of
incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting. As
14
a result, the holders of a majority of the votes of the
outstanding shares of our common stock have the ability to elect
all of the directors being elected at any annual meeting of
stockholders.
Delaware
Anti-Takeover Law
Section 203 of the DGCL provides that, subject to
exceptions specified therein, an interested
stockholder of a Delaware corporation shall not engage in
any business combination, including general mergers
or consolidations or acquisitions of additional shares of the
corporation, with the corporation for a three-year period
following the time that such stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction
which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested
stockholder;
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the
interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of
the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction
commenced (excluding specified shares); or
|
|
|
|
on or subsequent to such time, the business combination is
approved by the board of directors of the corporation and
authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and
not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested
stockholder.
|
Under Section 203, the restrictions described above also do
not apply to specified business combinations proposed by an
interested stockholder following the announcement or
notification of one of specified transactions involving the
corporation and a person who had not been an interested
stockholder during the previous three years or who became an
interested stockholder with the approval of a majority of the
corporations directors, if such transaction is approved or
not opposed by a majority of the directors who were directors
prior to any person becoming an interested stockholder during
the previous three years or were recommended for election or
elected to succeed such directors by a majority of such
directors. The restrictions described above also do not apply to
specified business combinations with a person who is an
interested stockholder prior to the time when the
corporations common stock is listed on a national
securities exchange, so these restrictions would not apply to a
business combination with any person who is a stockholder of SCC
prior to this offering.
Except as otherwise specified in Section 203, an
interested stockholder is defined to include:
|
|
|
|
|
any person that is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding
voting stock of the corporation, or is an affiliate or associate
of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of the corporation at any time within
three years immediately prior to the date of
determination; and
|
|
|
|
the affiliates and associates of any such person.
|
Under some circumstances, Section 203 makes it more
difficult for a person who is an interested stockholder to
effect various business combinations with us for a three-year
period. We have not elected to be exempt from the restrictions
imposed under Section 203.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
DESCRIPTION
OF DEBT SECURITIES
Any debt securities that we offer under a prospectus supplement
will be direct, unsecured general obligations. The debt
securities will be either senior debt securities or subordinated
debt securities. The debt securities will be issued under one or
more separate indentures between us and a banking or financial
institution, as trustee. Senior debt securities will be issued
under a senior indenture and subordinated debt securities will
be issued under a subordinated indenture. Together, the senior
indenture and the subordinated
15
indenture are called indentures. The indentures will
be supplemented by supplemental indentures, the material
provisions of which will be described in a prospectus supplement.
As used in this description, the words Sterling,
we, us and our refer to
Sterling Construction Company, Inc., and not to any of its
subsidiaries or affiliates.
We have summarized some of the material provisions of the
indentures below. This summary does not restate those agreements
in their entirety. A form of senior indenture and a form of
subordinated indenture have been filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We
urge you to read each of the indentures because each one, and
not this description, defines the rights of holders of debt
securities.
Capitalized terms defined in the indentures have the same
meanings when used in this prospectus.
General
The debt securities issued under the indentures will be our
direct, unsecured general obligations. The senior debt
securities will rank equally with all of our other senior and
unsubordinated debt. The subordinated debt securities will have
a junior position to all of our senior debt.
A substantial portion of our assets are held by our operating
subsidiaries. With respect to these assets, holders of senior
debt securities that are not guaranteed by our operating
subsidiaries and holders of subordinated debt securities will
have a position junior to the prior claims of creditors of these
subsidiaries, including trade creditors, debtholders, secured
creditors, taxing authorities and guarantee holders, and any
preferred stockholders, except to the extent that we may ourself
be a creditor with recognized claims against any subsidiary. Our
ability to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on
any debt securities is, to a large extent, dependent upon the
payment to us by our subsidiaries of dividends, debt principal
and interest or other charges.
The following description sets forth the general terms and
provisions that could apply to debt securities that we may offer
to sell. A prospectus supplement and an indenture relating to
any series of debt securities being offered will include
specific terms relating to the offering. These terms will
include some or all of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the title and type of the debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the total principal amount of the debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the percentage of the principal amount at which the debt
securities will be issued and any payments due if the maturity
of the debt securities is accelerated;
|
|
|
|
the dates on which the principal of the debt securities will be
payable;
|
|
|
|
the interest rate which the debt securities will bear and the
interest payment dates for the debt securities;
|
|
|
|
any conversion or exchange features;
|
|
|
|
any optional redemption periods;
|
|
|
|
any sinking fund or other provisions that would obligate us to
repurchase or otherwise redeem some or all of the debt
securities;
|
|
|
|
any provisions granting special rights to holders when a
specified event occurs;
|
|
|
|
any changes to or additional events of default or covenants;
|
|
|
|
any special tax implications of the debt securities, including
provisions for original issue discount securities, if
offered; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms of the debt securities.
|
16
None of the indentures will limit the amount of debt securities
that may be issued. Each indenture will allow debt securities to
be issued up to the principal amount that may be authorized by
us and may be in any currency or currency unit designated by us.
Debt securities of a series may be issued in registered, coupon
or global form.
Subsidiary
Guarantees
If the applicable prospectus supplement relating to a series of
our senior debt securities provides that those senior debt
securities will have the benefit of a guarantee by any or all of
our operating subsidiaries, payment of the principal, premium,
if any, and interest on those senior debt securities will be
unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated basis
by such subsidiary or subsidiaries. The guarantee of senior debt
securities will rank equally in right of payment with all of the
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of such subsidiary or
subsidiaries.
If the applicable prospectus supplement relating to a series of
our subordinated debt securities provides that those
subordinated debt securities will have the benefit of a
guarantee by any or all of our operating subsidiaries, payment
of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on those
subordinated debt securities will be unconditionally guaranteed
on an unsecured, subordinated basis by such subsidiary or
subsidiaries. The guarantee of the subordinated debt securities
will be subordinated in right of payment to all of such
subsidiarys or subsidiaries existing and future
senior indebtedness (as defined in the related prospectus
supplement), including any guarantee of the senior debt
securities, to the same extent and in the same manner as the
subordinated debt securities are subordinated to our senior
indebtedness (as defined in the related prospectus supplement).
See Subordination below.
The obligations of our operating subsidiaries under any such
guarantee will be limited as necessary to prevent the guarantee
from constituting a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer
under applicable law.
Covenants
Under the indentures, we:
|
|
|
|
|
will pay the principal of, interest and any premium on, the debt
securities when due;
|
|
|
|
will maintain a place of payment;
|
|
|
|
will deliver a certificate to the trustee at the end of each
fiscal year reviewing our obligations under the indentures;
|
|
|
|
will preserve our corporate existence; and
|
|
|
|
will deposit sufficient funds with any paying agent on or before
the due date for any principal, interest or premium.
|
Mergers
and Sale of Assets
Each of the indentures will provide that we may not consolidate
with or merge into any other person or sell, convey, transfer or
lease all or substantially all of our properties and assets (on
a consolidated basis) to another person, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
either: (a) Sterling is the surviving corporation; or
(b) the person or entity formed by or surviving any such
consolidation, amalgamation or merger or resulting from such
conversion (if other than Sterling) or to which such sale,
assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition has been
made is a corporation, limited liability company or limited
partnership organized or existing under the laws of the United
States, any state of the United States or the District of
Columbia;
|
|
|
|
the person or entity formed by or surviving any such conversion,
consolidation, amalgamation or merger (if other than Sterling)
or the person or entity to which such sale, assignment,
transfer, conveyance or other disposition has been made assumes
all of the obligations of Sterling under such
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
indenture and the debt securities governed thereby pursuant to
agreements reasonably satisfactory to the trustee; provided
that, unless such person or entity is a corporation, a corporate
co-issuer of such debt securities will be added to the
applicable indenture by agreements reasonably satisfactory to
the trustee;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we or the successor will not immediately be in default under
such indenture; and
|
|
|
|
we deliver an officers certificate and opinion of counsel
to the trustee stating that such consolidation or merger
complies with such indenture and that all conditions precedent
set forth in such indenture have been complied with.
|
Upon the assumption of our obligations under each indenture by a
successor, we will be discharged from all obligations under such
indenture.
Events of
Default
Event of default, when used in the
indentures, with respect to debt securities of any series, will
mean any of the following:
(1) default in the payment of any interest upon any debt
security of that series when it becomes due and payable, and
continuance of such default for a period of 30 days;
(2) default in the payment of the principal of (or premium,
if any, on) any debt security of that series at its maturity;
(3) default in the performance, or breach, of any covenant
set forth in Article Ten of the applicable indenture (other
than a covenant a default in whose performance or whose breach
is elsewhere specifically dealt with as an event of default or
which has expressly been included in such indenture solely for
the benefit of one or more series of debt securities other than
that series), and continuance of such default or breach for a
period of 90 days after there has been given, by registered
or certified mail, to Sterling by the trustee or to Sterling and
the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in principal amount
of the then-outstanding debt securities of that series a written
notice specifying such default or breach and requiring it to be
remedied and stating that such notice is a Notice of
Default thereunder;
(4) default in the performance, or breach, of any covenant
in the applicable indenture (other than a covenant set forth in
Article Ten of such indenture or any other covenant a
default in whose performance or whose breach is elsewhere
specifically dealt with as an event of default or which has
expressly been included in such indenture solely for the benefit
of one or more series of debt securities other than that
series), and continuance of such default or breach for a period
of 180 days after there has been given, by registered or
certified mail, to Sterling by the trustee or to Sterling and
the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in principal amount
of the then-outstanding debt securities of that series a written
notice specifying such default or breach and requiring it to be
remedied and stating that such notice is a Notice of
Default thereunder;
(5) Sterling, pursuant to or within the meaning of any
bankruptcy law, (i) commences a voluntary case,
(ii) consents to the entry of any order for relief against
it in an involuntary case, (iii) consents to the
appointment of a custodian of it or for all or substantially all
of its property, or (iv) makes a general assignment for the
benefit of its creditors;
(6) a court of competent jurisdiction enters an order or
decree under any bankruptcy law that (i) is for relief
against Sterling in an involuntary case, (ii) appoints a
custodian of Sterling or for all or substantially all of its
property, or (iii) orders the liquidation of Sterling, and
the order or decree remains unstayed and in effect for 60
consecutive days;
(7) default in the deposit of any sinking fund payment when
due; or
(8) any other event of default provided with respect to
debt securities of that series in accordance with provisions of
the indenture related to the issuance of such debt securities.
18
An event of default for a particular series of debt securities
does not necessarily constitute an event of default for any
other series of debt securities issued under an indenture. The
trustee may withhold notice to the holders of debt securities of
any default (except in the payment of principal, interest or any
premium) if it considers the withholding of notice to be in the
interests of the holders.
If an event of default for any series of debt securities occurs
and continues, the trustee or the holders of a specified
percentage in aggregate principal amount of the debt securities
of the series may declare the entire principal of all of the
debt securities of that series to be due and payable
immediately. If this happens, subject to certain conditions, the
holders of a specified percentage of the aggregate principal
amount of the debt securities of that series can void the
declaration.
Other than its duties in case of a default, a trustee is not
obligated to exercise any of its rights or powers under any
indenture at the request, order or direction of any holders,
unless the holders offer the trustee reasonable indemnity. If
they provide this reasonable indemnification, the holders of a
majority in principal amount outstanding of any series of debt
securities may direct the time, method and place of conducting
any proceeding or any remedy available to the trustee, or
exercising any power conferred upon the trustee, for any series
of debt securities.
Amendments
and Waivers
Subject to certain exceptions, the indentures, the debt
securities issued thereunder or the subsidiary guarantees may be
amended or supplemented with the consent of the holders of a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the then-outstanding
debt securities of each series affected by such amendment or
supplemental indenture, with each such series voting as a
separate class (including, without limitation, consents obtained
in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange
offer for, debt securities) and, subject to certain exceptions,
any past default or compliance with any provisions may be waived
with respect to each series of debt securities with the consent
of the holders of a majority in principal amount of the
then-outstanding debt securities of such series voting as a
separate class (including consents obtained in connection with a
purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, debt
securities).
Without the consent of each holder of the outstanding debt
securities affected, an amendment or waiver may not, among other
things:
(1) change the stated maturity of the principal of, or any
installment of principal of or interest on, any debt security,
or reduce the principal amount thereof or the rate of interest
thereon or any premium payable upon the redemption thereof, or
reduce the amount of the principal of an original issue discount
security that would be due and payable upon a declaration of
acceleration of the maturity thereof pursuant to the applicable
indenture, or change any place of payment where, or the coin or
currency in which, any debt security or any premium or the
interest thereon is payable, or impair the right to institute
suit for the enforcement of any such payment on or after the
stated maturity thereof (or, in the case of redemption, on or
after the redemption date therefor),
(2) reduce the percentage in principal amount of the
then-outstanding debt securities of any series, the consent of
whose holders is required for any such supplemental indenture,
or the consent of whose holders is required for any waiver (of
compliance with certain provisions of the applicable indenture
or certain defaults thereunder and their consequences) provided
for in the applicable indenture,
(3) modify any of the provisions set forth in
(i) sections related to matters addressed in items
(1) through (15) of this caption,
Amendments and Waivers, immediately
below, (ii) the provisions of the applicable indenture
related to the holders unconditional right to receive
principal, premium, if any, and interest on the debt securities
or (iii) the provisions of the applicable indenture related
to the waiver of past defaults under such indenture except to
increase any such percentage or to provide that certain other
provisions of such indenture cannot be modified or waived
without the consent of the holder of each then-outstanding debt
security affected thereby; provided, however, that this clause
shall not be deemed to require the consent of any holder with
respect to changes in the references to the trustee
and
19
concomitant changes in this section of such indenture, or the
deletion of this proviso in such indenture, in accordance with
the requirements of such indenture;
(4) waive a redemption payment with respect to any debt
security; provided, however, that any purchase or repurchase of
debt securities shall not be deemed a redemption of the debt
securities;
(5) release any guarantor from any of its obligations under
its guarantee or the applicable indenture, except in accordance
with the terms of such indenture (as supplemented by any
supplemental indenture); or
(6) make any change in the foregoing amendment and waiver
provisions.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, without the consent of any holder
of debt securities, Sterling, the guarantors and the trustee may
amend each of the indentures or the debt securities issued
thereunder to:
(1) cure any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any
provision therein that may be inconsistent with any other
provision therein;
(2) evidence the succession of another person or entity to
Sterling and the assumption by any such successor of the
covenants of Sterling therein and, to the extent applicable, to
the debt securities;
(3) provide for uncertificated debt securities in addition
to or in place of certificated debt securities; provided that
the uncertificated debt securities are issued in registered form
for purposes of Section 163(f) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the Code), or in the
manner such that the uncertificated debt securities are
described in Section 163(f)(2)(B) of the Code;
(4) add a guarantee and cause any person or entity to
become a guarantor,
and/or to
evidence the succession of another person or entity to a
guarantor and the assumption by any such successor of the
guarantee of such guarantor therein and, to the extent
applicable, endorsed upon any debt securities of any series;
(5) secure the debt securities of any series;
(6) add to the covenants of Sterling such further
covenants, restrictions, conditions or provisions as Sterling
shall consider to be appropriate for the benefit of the holders
of all or any series of debt securities (and if such covenants,
restrictions, conditions or provisions are to be for the benefit
of less than all series of debt securities, stating that such
covenants are expressly being included solely for the benefit of
such series) or to surrender any right or power therein
conferred upon Sterling and to make the occurrence, or the
occurrence and continuance, of a default in any such additional
covenants, restrictions, conditions or provisions an event of
default permitting the enforcement of all or any of the several
remedies provided in the applicable indenture as set forth
therein; provided, that in respect of any such additional
covenant, restriction, condition or provision, such supplemental
indenture may provide for a particular period of grace after
default (which period may be shorter or longer than that allowed
in the case of other defaults) or may provide for an immediate
enforcement upon such an event of default or may limit the
remedies available to the trustee upon such an event of default
or may limit the right of the holders of a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the debt securities of such series to waive
such an event of default;
(7) make any change to any provision of the applicable
indenture that does not adversely affect the rights or interests
of any holder of debt securities issued thereunder;
(8) provide for the issuance of additional debt securities
in accordance with the provisions set forth in the applicable
indenture on the date of such indenture;
(9) add any additional defaults or events of default in
respect of all or any series of debt securities;
(10) add to, change or eliminate any of the provisions of
the applicable indenture to such extent as shall be necessary to
permit or facilitate the issuance of debt securities in bearer
form, registrable or not registrable as to principal, and with
or without interest coupons;
20
(11) change or eliminate any of the provisions of the
applicable indenture; provided that any such change or
elimination shall become effective only when there is no debt
security outstanding of any series created prior to the
execution of such supplemental indenture that is entitled to the
benefit of such provision;
(12) establish the form or terms of debt securities of any
series as permitted thereunder, including to reopen any series
of any debt securities as permitted thereunder;
(13) evidence and provide for the acceptance of appointment
thereunder by a successor trustee with respect to the debt
securities of one or more series and to add to or change any of
the provisions of the applicable indenture as shall be necessary
to provide for or facilitate the administration of the trusts
thereunder by more than one trustee, pursuant to the
requirements of such indenture;
(14) conform the text of the applicable indenture (and/or
any supplemental indenture) or any debt securities issued
thereunder to any provision of a description of such debt
securities appearing in a prospectus or prospectus supplement or
an offering memorandum or offering circular to the extent that
such provision was intended to be a verbatim recreation of a
provision of such indenture (and/or any supplemental indenture)
or any debt securities issued thereunder; or
(15) modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of the
applicable indenture to such extent as shall be necessary to
effect the qualification of such indenture under the
Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the
Trust Indenture Act), or under any
similar federal statute subsequently enacted, and to add to such
indenture such other provisions as may be expressly required
under the Trust Indenture Act.
The consent of the holders is not necessary under either
indenture to approve the particular form of any proposed
amendment. It is sufficient if such consent approves the
substance of the proposed amendment. After an amendment under an
indenture becomes effective, Sterling is required to mail to the
holders of debt securities thereunder a notice briefly
describing such amendment. However, the failure to give such
notice to all such holders, or any defect therein, will not
impair or affect the validity of the amendment.
Legal
Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
Each indenture provides that Sterling may, at its option and at
any time, elect to have all of its obligations discharged with
respect to the debt securities outstanding thereunder and all
obligations of any guarantors of such debt securities discharged
with respect to their guarantees (Legal
Defeasance), except for:
(1) the rights of holders of outstanding debt securities to
receive payments in respect of the principal of, or interest or
premium, if any, on such debt securities when such payments are
due from the trust referred to below;
(2) Sterlings obligations with respect to the debt
securities concerning issuing temporary debt securities,
registration of debt securities, mutilated, destroyed, lost or
stolen debt securities and the maintenance of an office or
agency for payment and money for security payments held in trust;
(3) the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities of
the trustee, and Sterlings and each guarantors
obligations in connection therewith; and
(4) the Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance provisions
of the applicable indenture.
In addition, Sterling may, at its option and at any time, elect
to have the obligations of Sterling released with respect to
certain provisions of each indenture, including certain
provisions set forth in any supplemental indenture thereto (such
release and termination being referred to as Covenant
Defeasance), and thereafter any omission to comply with
such obligations or provisions will not constitute a default or
event of default. In the event Covenant Defeasance occurs in
accordance with the applicable indenture, the events of default
described under clauses (3) and (4) under the caption
Events of Default, in each case, will no
longer constitute an event of default thereunder.
21
In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant
Defeasance:
(1) Sterling must irrevocably deposit with the trustee, in
trust, for the benefit of the holders of the debt securities,
cash in U.S. dollars, non-callable government securities,
or a combination of cash in U.S. dollars and non-callable
U.S. government securities, in amounts as will be
sufficient, in the opinion of a nationally recognized investment
bank, appraisal firm or firm of independent public accountants
to pay the principal of, or interest and premium, if any, on the
outstanding debt securities on the stated date for payment
thereof or on the applicable redemption date, as the case may
be, and Sterling must specify whether the debt securities are
being defeased to such stated date for payment or to a
particular redemption date;
(2) in the case of Legal Defeasance, Sterling has delivered
to the trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to
the trustee confirming that (a) Sterling has received from,
or there has been published by, the Internal Revenue Service a
ruling or (b) since the issue date of the debt securities,
there has been a change in the applicable federal income tax
law, in either case to the effect that, and based thereon such
opinion of counsel will confirm that, the holders of the
outstanding debt securities will not recognize income, gain or
loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of such Legal
Defeasance and will be subject to federal income tax on the same
amounts, in the same manner and at the same time as would have
been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred;
(3) in the case of Covenant Defeasance, Sterling has
delivered to the trustee an opinion of counsel reasonably
acceptable to the trustee confirming that the holders of the
outstanding debt securities will not recognize income, gain or
loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of such
Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to federal income tax on
the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as
would have been the case if such Covenant Defeasance had not
occurred;
(4) no default or event of default has occurred and is
continuing on the date of such deposit (other than a default or
event of default resulting from the borrowing of funds to be
applied to such deposit);
(5) the deposit will not result in a breach or violation
of, or constitute a default under, any other instrument to which
Sterling or any guarantor is a party or by which Sterling or any
guarantor is bound;
(6) such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not
result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default
under, any material agreement or instrument (other than the
applicable indenture) to which Sterling or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or by which Sterling or any of its
subsidiaries is bound;
(7) Sterling must deliver to the trustee an officers
certificate stating that the deposit was not made by Sterling
with the intent of preferring the holders of debt securities
over the other creditors of Sterling with the intent of
defeating, hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors of
Sterling or others;
(8) Sterling must deliver to the trustee an officers
certificate, stating that all conditions precedent set forth in
clauses (1) through (7) of this paragraph have been
complied with; and
(9) Sterling must deliver to the trustee an opinion of
counsel (which opinion of counsel may be subject to customary
assumptions, qualifications, and exclusions), stating that all
conditions precedent set forth in clauses (2), (3) and
(5) of this paragraph have been complied with; provided
that the opinion of counsel with respect to clause (5) of
this paragraph may be to the knowledge of such counsel.
Satisfaction
and Discharge
Each of the indentures will be discharged and will cease to be
of further effect (except as to surviving rights of registration
of transfer or exchange of debt securities, as expressly
provided for in such indenture) as to all outstanding debt
securities issued thereunder and the guarantees issued
thereunder when:
(1) either (a) all of the debt securities theretofore
authenticated and delivered under such indenture (except lost,
stolen or destroyed debt securities that have been replaced or
paid and debt securities for whose payment money or certain
United States governmental obligations have theretofore been
deposited
22
in trust or segregated and held in trust by Sterling and
thereafter repaid to Sterling or discharged from such trust)
have been delivered to the trustee for cancellation or
(b) all debt securities not theretofore delivered to the
trustee for cancellation have become due and payable or will
become due and payable at their stated maturity within one year,
or are to be called for redemption within one year under
arrangements satisfactory to the trustee for the giving of
notice of redemption by the trustee in the name, and at the
expense, of Sterling, and Sterling or the guarantors have
irrevocably deposited or caused to be deposited with the trustee
funds or U.S. government obligations, or a combination
thereof, in an amount sufficient to pay and discharge the entire
indebtedness on the debt securities not theretofore delivered to
the trustee for cancellation, for principal of and premium, if
any, on and interest on the debt securities to the date of
deposit (in the case of debt securities that have become due and
payable) or to the stated maturity or redemption date, as the
case may be, together with instructions from Sterling
irrevocably directing the trustee to apply such funds to the
payment thereof at maturity or redemption, as the case may be;
(2) Sterling or the guarantors have paid all other sums
then due and payable under such indenture by Sterling; and
(3) Sterling has delivered to the trustee an officers
certificate and an opinion of counsel, which, taken together,
state that all conditions precedent under such indenture
relating to the satisfaction and discharge of such indenture
have been complied with.
No
Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees, Partners
and Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator, partner or
stockholder of Sterling or any guarantor, as such, shall have
any liability for any obligations of Sterling or the guarantors
under the debt securities, the indentures, the guarantees or for
any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, such
obligations or their creation. Each holder, upon Sterlings
issuance of the debt securities and execution of the indentures,
waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release
are part of the consideration for issuance of the debt
securities. Such waiver may not be effective to waive
liabilities under the federal securities laws and it is the view
of the SEC that such a waiver is against public policy.
Denominations
Unless stated otherwise in the prospectus supplement for each
issuance of debt securities, the debt securities will be issued
in denominations of $1,000 each or integral multiples of $1,000.
Paying
Agent and Registrar
The trustee will initially act as paying agent and registrar for
the debt securities. Sterling may change the paying agent or
registrar without prior notice to the holders of the debt
securities, and Sterling may act as paying agent or registrar.
Transfer
and Exchange
A holder may transfer or exchange debt securities in accordance
with the applicable indenture. The registrar and the trustee may
require a holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate
endorsements and transfer documents, and Sterling may require a
holder to pay any taxes and fees required by law or permitted by
the applicable indenture. Sterling is not required to transfer
or exchange any debt security selected for redemption. In
addition, Sterling is not required to transfer or exchange any
debt security for a period of 15 days before a selection of
debt securities to be redeemed.
Subordination
The payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on,
subordinated debt securities and any other payment obligations
of Sterling in respect of subordinated debt securities
(including any obligation to
23
repurchase subordinated debt securities) is subordinated in
certain circumstances in right of payment, as set forth in the
subordinated indenture, to the prior payment in full in cash of
all senior debt.
Sterling also may not make any payment, whether by redemption,
purchase, retirement, defeasance or otherwise, upon or in
respect of subordinated debt securities, except from the trust
described under Legal Defeasance and Covenant
Defeasance, if
|
|
|
|
|
a default in the payment of all or any portion of the
obligations on any senior debt (payment
default) occurs, or
|
|
|
|
any other default occurs and is continuing with respect to
designated senior debt pursuant to which the maturity thereof
may be accelerated (non-payment default) and,
solely with respect to this clause, the trustee for the
subordinated debt securities receives a notice of the default (a
Payment Blockage Notice) from the trustee or other
representative for the holders of such designated senior debt.
|
Cash payments on subordinated debt securities will be resumed
(a) in the case of a payment default, upon the date on
which such default is cured or waived and (b) in case of a
nonpayment default, the earlier of the date on which such
nonpayment default is cured or waived or 179 days after the
date on which the applicable Payment Blockage Notice is
received, unless the maturity of any designated senior debt has
been accelerated or a bankruptcy event of default has occurred
and is continuing. No new period of payment blockage may be
commenced unless and until 360 days have elapsed since the
date of commencement of the payment blockage period resulting
from the immediately prior Payment Blockage Notice. No
nonpayment default in respect of designated senior debt that
existed or was continuing on the date of delivery of any Payment
Blockage Notice to the trustee for the subordinated debt
securities will be, or be made, the basis for a subsequent
Payment Blockage Notice unless such default shall have been
cured or waived for a period of no less than 90 consecutive days.
The subordinated indenture also requires that we promptly notify
holders of senior debt if payment of subordinated debt
securities is accelerated because of an event of default.
Upon any payment or distribution of assets or securities of
Sterling, in connection with any dissolution or winding up or
total or partial liquidation or reorganization of Sterling,
whether voluntary or involuntary, or in bankruptcy, insolvency,
receivership or other proceedings or other marshalling of assets
for the benefit of creditors, all amounts due or to become due
upon all senior debt shall first be paid in full, in cash or
cash equivalents, before the holders of the subordinated debt
securities or the trustee on their behalf shall be entitled to
receive any payment by Sterling on account of the subordinated
debt securities, or any payment to acquire any of the
subordinated debt securities for cash, property or securities,
or any distribution with respect to the subordinated debt
securities of any cash, property or securities. Before any
payment may be made by, or on behalf of, Sterling on any
subordinated debt security (other than with the money,
securities or proceeds held under any defeasance trust
established in accordance with the subordinated indenture), in
connection with any such dissolution, winding up, liquidation or
reorganization, any payment or distribution of assets or
securities for Sterling, to which the holders of subordinated
debt securities or the trustee on their behalf would be entitled
shall be made by Sterling or by any receiver, trustee in
bankruptcy, liquidating trustee, agent or other similar person
or entity making such payment or distribution or by the holders
or the trustee if received by them or it, directly to the
holders of senior debt or their representatives or to any
trustee or trustees under any indenture pursuant to which any
such senior debt may have been issued, as their respective
interests appear, to the extent necessary to pay all such senior
debt in full, in cash or cash equivalents, after giving effect
to any concurrent payment, distribution or provision therefor to
or for the holders of such senior debt.
As a result of these subordination provisions, in the event of
the liquidation, bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency,
receivership or similar proceeding or an assignment for the
benefit of the creditors of Sterling or a marshalling of assets
or liabilities of Sterling, holders of subordinated debt
securities may receive ratably less than other creditors.
24
Payment
and Transfer
Principal, interest and any premium on fully registered debt
securities will be paid at designated places. Payment will be
made by check mailed to the persons in whose names the debt
securities are registered on days specified in the indentures or
any prospectus supplement. Debt securities payments in other
forms will be paid at a place designated by us and specified in
a prospectus supplement.
Fully registered debt securities may be transferred or exchanged
at the corporation trust office of the trustee or at any other
office or agency maintained by us for such purposes, without the
payment of any service charge except for any tax or governmental
charge.
Global
Securities
The debt securities of a series may be issued in whole or in
part in the form of one or more global certificates that we will
deposit with a depositary identified in the applicable
prospectus supplement. Unless and until it is exchanged in whole
or in part for the individual debt securities that it
represents, a global security may not be transferred except as a
whole:
|
|
|
|
|
by the applicable depositary to a nominee of the depositary;
|
|
|
|
by any nominee to the depositary itself or another
nominee; or
|
|
|
|
by the depositary or any nominee to a successor depositary or
any nominee of the successor.
|
We will describe the specific terms of the depositary
arrangement with respect to a series of debt securities in the
applicable prospectus supplement. We anticipate that the
following provisions will generally apply to depositary
arrangements.
When we issue a global security in registered form, the
depositary for the global security or its nominee will credit,
on its book-entry registration and transfer system, the
respective principal amounts of the individual debt securities
represented by that global security to the accounts of persons
that have accounts with the depositary
(participants). Those accounts will be
designated by the dealers, underwriters or agents with respect
to the underlying debt securities or by us if those debt
securities are offered and sold directly by us. Ownership of
beneficial interests in a global security will be limited to
participants or persons that may hold interests through
participants. For interests of participants, ownership of
beneficial interests in the global security will be shown on
records maintained by the applicable depositary or its nominee.
For interests of persons other than participants, that ownership
information will be shown on the records of participants.
Transfer of that ownership will be effected only through those
records. The laws of some states require that certain purchasers
of securities take physical delivery of securities in definitive
form. These limits and laws may impair our ability to transfer
beneficial interests in a global security.
As long as the depositary for a global security, or its nominee,
is the registered owner of that global security, the depositary
or nominee will be considered the sole owner or holder of the
debt securities represented by the global security for all
purposes under the applicable indenture. Except as provided
below, owners of beneficial interests in a global security:
|
|
|
|
|
will not be entitled to have any of the underlying debt
securities registered in their names;
|
|
|
|
will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of
any of the underlying debt securities in definitive
form; and
|
|
|
|
will not be considered the owners or holders under the indenture
relating to those debt securities.
|
Payments of principal of, any premium on and any interest on
individual debt securities represented by a global security
registered in the name of a depositary or its nominee will be
made to the depositary or its nominee as the registered owner of
the global security representing such debt securities. Neither
we, the trustee for the debt securities, any paying agent nor
the registrar for the debt securities will be responsible for
any aspect of the records relating to or payments made by the
depositary or any participants on account of beneficial
interests in the global security.
25
We expect that the depositary or its nominee, upon receipt of
any payment of principal, any premium or interest relating to a
global security representing any series of debt securities,
immediately will credit participants accounts with the
payments. Those payments will be credited in amounts
proportional to the respective beneficial interests of the
participants in the principal amount of the global security as
shown on the records of the depositary or its nominee. We also
expect that payments by participants to owners of beneficial
interests in the global security held through those participants
will be governed by standing instructions and customary
practices. This is now the case with securities held for the
accounts of customers registered in street name.
Those payments will be the sole responsibility of those
participants.
If the depositary for a series of debt securities is at any time
unwilling, unable or ineligible to continue as depositary and we
do not appoint a successor depositary within 90 days, we
will issue individual debt securities of that series in exchange
for the global security or securities representing that series.
In addition, we may at any time in our sole discretion determine
not to have any debt securities of a series represented by one
or more global securities. In that event, we will issue
individual debt securities of that series in exchange for the
global security or securities. Furthermore, if we specify, an
owner of a beneficial interest in a global security may, on
terms acceptable to us, the trustee and the applicable
depositary, receive individual debt securities of that series in
exchange for those beneficial interests. The foregoing is
subject to any limitations described in the applicable
prospectus supplement. In any such instance, the owner of the
beneficial interest will be entitled to physical delivery of
individual debt securities equal in principal amount to the
beneficial interest and to have the debt securities registered
in its name. Those individual debt securities will be issued in
any authorized denominations.
Governing
Law
Each indenture and the debt securities will be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
Notices
Notices to holders of debt securities will be given by mail to
the addresses of such holders as they appear in the security
register for such debt securities.
No
Personal Liability of Officers, Directors, Employees or
Stockholders
No officer, director, employee or stockholder, as such, of ours
or any of our affiliates shall have any personal liability in
respect of our obligations under any indenture or the debt
securities by reason of his, her or its status as such.
Information
Concerning the Trustee
A banking or financial institution will be the trustee under the
indentures. A successor trustee may be appointed in accordance
with the terms of the indentures.
The indentures and the provisions of the Trust Indenture
Act incorporated by reference therein, will contain certain
limitations on the rights of the trustee, should it become a
creditor of us, to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or
to realize on certain property received in respect of any such
claim as security or otherwise. The trustee will be permitted to
engage in other transactions; however, if it acquires any
conflicting interest (within the meaning of the
Trust Indenture Act), it must eliminate such conflicting
interest or resign.
A single banking or financial institution may act as trustee
with respect to both the subordinated indenture and the senior
indenture. If this occurs, and should a default occur with
respect to either the subordinated debt securities or the senior
debt securities, such banking or financial institution would be
required to resign as trustee under one of the indentures within
90 days of such default, pursuant to the
Trust Indenture Act, unless such default were cured, duly
waived or otherwise eliminated.
26
DESCRIPTION
OF WARRANTS
We may issue warrants to purchase common stock, preferred stock,
debt securities or units. Warrants may be issued independently
or together with any other securities and may be attached to, or
separate from, such securities. Each series of warrants will be
issued under a separate warrant agreement to be entered into
between us and a warrant agent. The terms of any warrants to be
issued and a description of the material provisions of the
applicable warrant agreement will be set forth in the applicable
prospectus supplement.
The applicable prospectus supplement will specify the following
terms of any warrants in respect of which this prospectus is
being delivered:
|
|
|
|
|
the title of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the aggregate number of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price or prices at which such warrants will be issued;
|
|
|
|
the securities purchasable upon exercise of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price at which, and the currency or currencies in which the
securities purchasable upon exercise of, such warrants may be
purchased;
|
|
|
|
the date on which the right to exercise such warrants shall
commence and the date on which such right shall expire;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants
which may be exercised at any one time;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the designation and terms of the securities with
which such warrants are issued and the number of such warrants
issued with each such security;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the date on and after which such warrants and the
related securities will be separately transferable;
|
|
|
|
information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of any material U.S. federal
income tax considerations; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms of such warrants, including terms, procedures
and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such
warrants.
|
As of March 31, 2008, we had issued and outstanding
warrants to purchase 356,266 shares of common stock. The
warrants do not confer upon holders thereof any voting or other
rights of stockholders.
DESCRIPTION
OF UNITS
As specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, we may
issue units consisting of one or more debt securities, shares of
common stock, shares of preferred stock or warrants or any
combination of such securities.
The applicable prospectus supplement will specify the following
terms of any units in respect of which this prospectus is being
delivered:
|
|
|
|
|
the terms of the units and of any of the debt securities, common
stock, preferred stock and warrants comprising the units,
including whether and under what circumstances the securities
comprising the units may be traded separately;
|
|
|
|
a description of the terms of any unit agreement governing the
units; and
|
|
|
|
a description of the provisions for the payment, settlement,
transfer or exchange of the units.
|
27
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell the securities through agents, underwriters or
dealers, or directly to one or more purchasers without using
underwriters or agents.
We may designate agents to solicit offers to purchase our
securities. We will name any agent involved in offering or
selling our securities, and any commissions that we will pay to
the agent, in the applicable prospectus supplement. Unless we
indicate otherwise in our prospectus supplement, our agents will
act on a best efforts basis for the period of their appointment.
If underwriters are used in the sale, the securities will be
acquired by the underwriters for their own account. The
underwriters may resell the securities in one or more
transactions (including block transactions), at negotiated
prices, at a fixed public offering price or at varying prices
determined at the time of sale. We will include the names of the
managing underwriter(s), as well as any other underwriters, and
the terms of the transaction, including the compensation the
underwriters and dealers will receive, in our prospectus
supplement. If we use an underwriter, we will execute an
underwriting agreement with the underwriter(s) at the time that
we reach an agreement for the sale of our securities. The
obligations of the underwriters to purchase the securities will
be subject to certain conditions contained in the underwriting
agreement. The underwriters will be obligated to purchase all
the securities of the series offered if any of the securities
are purchased. Any public offering price and any discounts or
concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to dealers may be
changed from time to time. The underwriters will use a
prospectus supplement to sell our securities.
If we use a dealer, we, as principal, will sell our securities
to the dealer. The dealer will then sell our securities to the
public at varying prices that the dealer will determine at the
time it sells our securities. We will include the name of the
dealer and the terms of our transactions with the dealer in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
We may directly solicit offers to purchase our securities, and
we may directly sell our securities to institutional or other
investors. In this case, no underwriters or agents would be
involved. We will describe the terms of our direct sales in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
Underwriters, dealers and agents that participate in the
distribution of the securities may be underwriters as defined in
the Securities Act and any discounts or commissions received by
them from us and any profit on their resale of the securities
may be treated as underwriting discounts and commissions under
the Securities Act. In connection with the sale of the
securities offered by this prospectus, underwriters may receive
compensation from us or from the purchasers of the securities,
for whom they may act as agents, in the form of discounts,
concessions or commissions, which will not exceed 7% of the
proceeds from the sale of the securities. Any underwriters,
dealers or agents will be identified and their compensation
described in the applicable prospectus supplement. We may have
agreements with the underwriters, dealers and agents to
indemnify them against certain civil liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute with
respect to payments which the underwriters, dealers or agents
may be required to make. Underwriters, dealers and agents may
engage in transactions with, or perform services for, us or our
subsidiaries in the ordinary course of their business.
Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement, all securities offered under this prospectus will be
a new issue of securities with no established trading market,
other than the common stock, which is currently listed and
traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We may elect to list
any other class or series of securities on a national securities
exchange or a foreign securities exchange but are not obligated
to do so. Any common stock sold by this prospectus will be
listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market subject to
official notice of issuance. We cannot give you any assurance as
to the liquidity of the trading markets for any of the
securities.
Any underwriter to whom securities are sold by us for public
offering and sale may engage in over-allotment transactions,
stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and
penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the
Exchange Act. Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the
underwriters of the securities in excess of the offering size,
which creates a syndicate short position. Stabilizing
transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so
long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified
28
maximum. Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of
the securities in the open market after the distribution has
been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions.
Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the securities
originally sold by the syndicate member are purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions. These activities may cause the price of the
securities to be higher than it would otherwise be. The
underwriters will not be obligated to engage in any of the
aforementioned transactions and may discontinue such
transactions at any time without notice.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the securities offered in this prospectus will
be passed upon for us by Andrews Kurth LLP, Houston, Texas. Any
underwriter will be advised about other issues related to any
offering by its own legal counsel.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Sterling Construction
Company, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007
incorporated by reference in this prospectus and elsewhere in
the registration statement have been audited by Grant Thornton
LLP, independent registered public accountants, as indicated in
their reports with respect thereto, and incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon the authority of said firm as
experts in giving said reports.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act
and file reports, proxy statements and other information with
the SEC. We have filed with the SEC a registration statement to
register the securities offered by this prospectus. This
prospectus, which forms part of the registration statement, does
not contain all of the information included in the registration
statement. For further information about us and the securities
offered in this prospectus, you should refer to the registration
statement and its exhibits. You may read and copy the
registration statement and any other document that we file with
the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room,
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room. In addition, the SEC maintains a web site that contains
registration statements, reports, proxy statements and other
information regarding registrants, such as us, that file
electronically with the SEC. The address of the web site is
www.sec.gov.
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the
information that we file with the SEC, which means that we can
disclose information to you by referring to those documents. The
information incorporated by reference is an important part of
this prospectus, and information we file later with the SEC will
automatically update and take the place of this information. We
are incorporating by reference in this prospectus the following
documents filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act (other than
any portions of the respective filings that were furnished
pursuant to Item 2.02 or 7.01 of Current Reports on
Form 8-K
or other applicable SEC rules):
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
as filed with the SEC on January 17, 2008, March 19,
2008, and June 2, 2008.
|
All documents that we file pursuant to Sections 13(a),
13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this
prospectus and until our offerings hereunder are completed, or
after the date of the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part and prior to effectiveness of the
registration statement, will be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into this prospectus and will be a part of this
prospectus from the date
29
of the filing of the document. Any statement contained in a
document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference
in this prospectus will be deemed to be modified or superseded
for purposes of this prospectus to the extent that a statement
contained in this prospectus or in any other subsequently filed
document that also is or is deemed to be incorporated by
reference in this prospectus modifies or supersedes that
statement. Any statement that is modified or superseded will not
constitute a part of this prospectus, except as modified or
superseded.
You may request, without charge, a copy of any incorporated
document (excluding exhibits, unless we have specifically
incorporated an exhibit in an incorporated document) by writing
or telephoning us at our principal executive offices at the
following address:
30
2,400,000 Shares
Sterling Construction Company,
Inc.
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
D.A. Davidson &
Co.
BB&T Capital
Markets