FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-12014
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
84-1169358 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1609 Heritage Commerce Court
Wake Forest, North Carolina
|
|
27587 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(919) 556-3056
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 1, 2009, 17,217,531 shares of the issuers Common Stock were outstanding.
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
18,861 |
|
|
$ |
24,316 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $264 and $276, respectively |
|
|
26,593 |
|
|
|
25,215 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
23,064 |
|
|
|
19,713 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
72,746 |
|
|
|
73,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,212 |
|
|
|
20,297 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Land, building and improvements |
|
|
4,711 |
|
|
|
4,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
27,581 |
|
|
|
25,621 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
23,146 |
|
|
|
21,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,256 |
|
|
|
7,256 |
|
Restricted annuity contract |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
Intangible rights and capitalized software costs, net of
accumulated amortization of $1,695 and $1,453, respectively |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
4,106 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
14,733 |
|
|
|
15,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
110,625 |
|
|
$ |
110,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7,309 |
|
|
$ |
5,817 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
23,147 |
|
Restructuring charges payable |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
Current income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
Current unrecognized tax benefit |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
30,666 |
|
|
|
31,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilites: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
4,828 |
|
|
|
5,201 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefit |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PowerSecure International stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock undesignated, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock Series C, $.01 par value; 500,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares
authorized; 17,217,531 and 17,071,889 shares issued
and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
109,444 |
|
|
|
108,384 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(36,194 |
) |
|
|
(35,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total PowerSecure International stockholders equity |
|
|
73,422 |
|
|
|
72,811 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
73,787 |
|
|
|
72,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
110,625 |
|
|
$ |
110,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. |
4
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
25,135 |
|
|
$ |
41,952 |
|
|
$ |
44,855 |
|
|
$ |
75,527 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
16,880 |
|
|
|
28,152 |
|
|
|
30,726 |
|
|
|
51,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
14,129 |
|
|
|
23,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
12,026 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
7,604 |
|
|
|
10,014 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
|
|
19,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Interest and finance charges |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
Equity income |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
5,244 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
7,508 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Loss from operations, including tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
6,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to PowerSecure International |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to
PowerSecure International common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to PowerSecure
International common stockholders: |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to
PowerSecure International common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to PowerSecure
International common stockholders: |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to PowerSecure International common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,892 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,815 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
Loss on disposal of miscellaneous assets |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effect of aquisitons: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
(3,586 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(3,024 |
) |
|
|
499 |
|
Other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
(3,124 |
) |
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
(10,883 |
) |
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
Deferred compensation obligation |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
Restricted annuity contract |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(2,840 |
) |
|
|
(6,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
(15,053 |
) |
Additions to intangible rights and software development |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
Acquisition |
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
|
|
(15,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
Proceeds from stock option and warrant exercises, net of shares tendered |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Principal payments on long-term notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Borrowings (payments) on line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(5,455 |
) |
|
|
(18,450 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
24,316 |
|
|
|
28,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
18,861 |
|
|
$ |
10,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and
For the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands, except per share data)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
PowerSecure International, Inc., based in Wake Forest, North Carolina, was incorporated on
April 5, 1991. We are a leading provider of Energy and Smart Grid Solutions to electric utilities,
and their commercial, institutional, and industrial customers. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment provides products and services in the areas of Interactive Distributed Generation®
(IDG®), Utility Infrastructure, and Energy Efficiency, and our Energy Services segment
provides services to the oil and natural gas industry through our Southern Flow and WaterSecure
business units.
Through our PowerSecure, Inc. subsidiary we operate our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment and focus on three of these areas: Interactive Distributed Generation®, Utility
Infrastructure, and Energy Efficiency. Our core Interactive Distributed Generation® business
involves installing sophisticated electric generation equipment directly at the location where
power is utilized. This equipment provides a dependable backup power supply during power outages,
while at the same time providing a more efficient and environmentally friendly means of delivering
power during high cost periods of peak power demand. Our intelligent Interactive Distributed
Generation® systems contain sophisticated electronic controls, which enables our systems to be
monitored 24x7 by our Smart Grid Monitoring Center, safeguarding our customers from power outages
and their related costs. Through this monitoring center, we utilize our proprietary smart grid
capabilities to forecast utilities peak demand periods, and electronically deploy our systems to
deliver more efficient and environmentally friendly power during these periods of peak demand. Our
systems also enable utilities to delay new infrastructure investments for transmitting and
distributing power, and minimize energy losses associated with moving electricity over long
distances.
Our Utility Infrastructure business is dedicated to helping utilities design and build
infrastructure to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our nations electric grid, including
transmission and distribution system upgrades, installation of advanced metering and efficient
lighting, and emergency storm restoration. Additionally, we provide utilities with a wide range
of engineering and design services, and consulting services for regulatory and rate design matters.
Our Energy Efficiency business is focused on providing lighting solutions for commercial,
industrial, and institutional customers, including our state-of-the-art green EfficientLights LED
lighting technology for refrigerated cases in grocery and retail drug stores.
Our Energy Services segment includes our Southern Flow Companies, Inc. and WaterSecure
Holdings, Inc. subsidiaries, and the focus of this segment is on business opportunities in the
energy services field.
7
Our Southern Flow subsidiary provides natural gas measurement services to customers involved
in the business of oil and natural gas production, transportation and processing, with a focus on
the natural gas market. WaterSecure Holdings, Inc., which we also refer to as WaterSecure, owns
approximately 40% of the equity interests in an unconsolidated business, Marcum Midstream 1995-2
Business Trust, which we refer to as MM 1995-2 or as our WaterSecure operations. Our
WaterSecure operations business operates water processing and disposal facilities in northeastern
Colorado.
See Note 11 for more information concerning our reportable segments.
Basis of Presentation
Organization The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
PowerSecure International, Inc. and its subsidiaries, primarily, PowerSecure, Inc. (our
PowerSecure subsidiary) (and its majority-owned and wholly-owned subsidiaries, UtilityEngineering,
Inc., PowerServices, Inc., EnergyLite, Inc. EfficientLights, LLC and Reids Trailer, Inc. dba
PowerFab), Southern Flow Companies, Inc. (Southern Flow), and WaterSecure Holdings, Inc.
(WaterSecure) (and its majority-owned subsidiary, Conquest Acquisition Company LLC (CAC LLC)),
collectively referred to as the Company or we or us or our.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In managements opinion, all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring) have been
made which are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position of us and
our subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and the consolidated results of our operations and cash flows
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
PowerSecure International, Inc. and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and
transactions. We use the equity method to account for our investment in unconsolidated
affiliate.
Noncontrolling Interest in EfficientLights Our PowerSecure subsidiary has a 66% controlling
ownership interest in EfficientLights which is consolidated in our financial statements. The 33%
noncontrolling ownership interest in the income of EfficientLights is included as a reduction to
net income (loss) to derive income (loss) attributable to PowerSecure International shareholders in
our consolidated statement of operations. The 33% noncontrolling ownership interest in the equity
of EfficientLights is shown as a separate component of stockholders equity in our consolidated
balance sheet.
Reclassification Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on our previously reported results of
operations or stockholders equity.
Use of Estimates The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that our
management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of
8
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Significant estimates include percentage-of-completion estimates for revenue and
cost of sales recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, inventory valuation
reserves, and our deferred tax valuation allowance.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition For our distributed generation turn-key project-based sales and our
utility infrastructure projects, we recognize revenue and profit as work progresses using the
percentage-of-completion method, which relies on various estimates. We believe the use of the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting for our distributed generation projects is preferable
to the completed contract method because a typical distributed generation construction project
occurs over several accounting periods and the percentage-of-completion method is a better method
to match the revenues and costs to the reporting period in which the construction services are
performed. Nearly all of our distributed generation projects are fixed-price contracts, with the
exception of certain contracts which provide for additional billings based on wire usage to connect
the distributed generation equipment to customer facilities.
In applying the percentage-of-completion method to our distributed generation turn-key
projects, we have identified the key output project phases that are standard components of our
construction projects. We have further identified, based on past experience, an estimate of the
value of each of these output phases based on a combination of costs incurred and the value added
to the overall construction project. While the order of these phases varies depending on the
project, each of these output phases is necessary to complete each project and each phase is an
integral part of the turnkey product solution we deliver to our customers. We use these output
phases and percentages to measure our progress toward completion of our construction projects. For
each reporting period, the status of each project, by phase, is determined by employees who are
managers of or are otherwise directly involved with the constructions project and is reviewed by
our accounting personnel. Utilizing this information, we recognize project revenues (and
associated project costs) and gross profit based on the percentage associated with output phases
that are complete or in process on each of our projects.
In applying the percentage-of-completion method to our utility infrastructure projects, sales
and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs
incurred and total estimated costs at completion.
In all cases where we utilize the percentage-of-completion, revenues and gross profit are
adjusted prospectively for revisions in estimated total contract costs and contract values.
Estimated losses, if any, are recorded when identified. While a project is in process, amounts
billed to customers in excess of revenues recognized to date are classified as current liabilities.
Likewise, amounts recognized as revenue in excess of actual billings to date are recorded as
unbilled accounts receivable. In the event a contract provides for adjustments to the contract
price for actual wire or other raw material usage, we recognize the associated revenue when the
actual costs are incurred and the customer is billed.
Because the percentage-of-completion method of accounting relies upon estimates described
above, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revision as a project progresses to
completion. Revisions in profit estimates are charged to income in the period in which the facts
that give rise to the revision become known. In the event we were required to adjust any
particular projects estimated revenues or costs, the effect on the current period earnings may or
may not be insignificant. If, however,
9
conditions arise that requires us to adjust our estimated revenues or costs for a series of
similar construction projects, the effect on current period earnings would most likely be
significant. In addition, certain contracts provide for cancellation provisions prior to
completion of a project. The cancellation provisions generally provide for payment of costs
incurred, but may result in an adjustment to profit already recognized in a prior period.
We recognize equipment and product revenue when persuasive evidence of a non-cancelable
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or
determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Equipment and product sales are generally
made directly to end users of the product, who are responsible for payment for the product.
Service revenue includes regulatory consulting and rate design services, power system
engineering services, energy conservation services, chart services, field services, laboratory
analysis, data management services, and monitoring and maintenance services. Revenues from these
services are recognized when the service is performed and the customer has accepted the work.
Revenues on our recurring revenue distributed generation projects are recognized over the term
of the contract as we provide utilities and their customers with access to distributed generation
systems for standby power and peak shaving or, in certain cases, when energy savings are realized
by the customer at their site. These contracts can involve multiple parties, with one party paying
us for the value of backup power (usually, but not always, a commercial, industrial, or
institutional customer), and one party paying us for the value of the electrical capacity provided
by the system (usually a utility).
Sales of certain goods or services sometimes involve the provision of multiple elements.
Revenues from contracts with multiple element arrangements are recognized as each element is earned
based on the relative fair value of each element and when the delivered elements have value to
customers on a standalone basis. Amounts allocated to each element are based on its objectively
determined fair value, such as the sales price for the product or service when it is sold
separately or competitor prices for similar products or services.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three
months or less from the date of purchase, including money market mutual funds, short-term time
deposits, and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash
equivalents.
Concentration of Credit Risk We are subject to concentrations of credit risk from our cash
and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We limit our exposure to credit risk associated with
cash and cash equivalents by placing our cash and cash equivalents with multiple domestic financial
institutions. Nevertheless, our cash in bank deposit accounts at these financial institutions
frequently exceeds federally insured limits. We further limit our exposure to credit risk
associated with these cash accounts by adherence to our investment policy. We have not experienced
any losses in such accounts.
From time to time, we have derived a material portion of our revenues from one or more
significant customers. To date, nearly all our revenues have been derived from sales to customers
within the United States.
Warranty Reserve We provide a standard one-year warranty for our distributed generation and
switchgear equipment, and a five-year warranty for our EfficientLights lighting product. In
addition, we offer extended warranty terms on our distributed generation turn-key and switchgear
projects. We reserve for the estimated cost of product warranties when revenue is recognized, and
we evaluate our reserve
10
periodically by comparing our warranty repair experience by product. The purchase price for
extended warranties or extended warranties included in the contract terms are deferred as a
component of our warranty reserve.
Share-Based Compensation We measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at the
fair value on date of grant and recognize the associated compensation cost over the service period
for awards expected to vest. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the number of
shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of the grant, and the fair
value of stock options is based on the Black-Scholes valuation model. These fair values are
recognized as compensation expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures.
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense for our stock options and restricted stock awards
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $433 and $601, respectively. Pre-tax
share-based compensation expense for our stock options and restricted stock awards during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $787 and $1,215, respectively. All share-based
compensation expense is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Income Taxes We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the estimated
future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. We have net
operating loss carryforwards available in certain jurisdictions to reduce future taxable income.
Future tax benefits for net operating loss carryforwards are recognized to the extent that
realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. To the extent that available
evidence raises doubt about the realization of a deferred income tax asset, a valuation allowance
is established. We account for uncertainty in income taxes utilizing minimum recognition
thresholds for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return that must be met before
being recognized in the financial statements. We recognize interest and penalties related to our
tax contingencies as income tax expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Noncontrolling Interest In late 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160), which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (minority interest) and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. We adopted the provisions of FAS 160 on a prospective basis
beginning January 1, 2009. Accordingly, the 33% noncontrolling shareholders ownership interest
in the equity of EfficientLights is included as a separate component of stockholders equity in our
consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009. The 33% noncontrolling shareholders ownership
interest in the income of EfficientLights is included in our consolidated statements of operations
in determining net income (loss) and earnings per share attributable to PowerSecure International
common stockholders. At December 31, 2008, the accumulated losses of the noncontrolling
shareholders interest in EfficientLights exceeded his basis. Under ARB No. 51, the noncontrolling
shareholders interest in the current period income of EfficientLights would have been offset
against the accumulated unrecognized noncontrolling shareholder losses. Accordingly, the effect of
adopting the provisions of FAS 160 on our statement of operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 was to increase the net loss attributable to PowerSecure International
shareholders by $331 and $365, respectively, for the effects of the unrecovered losses attributable
to the noncontrolling shareholder that were accumulated prior to December 31, 2008.
11
Accounting for Business Combinations In late 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 141 (FAS 141(R)), which significantly changes
the principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. FAS 141(R) also provides guidance for recognizing and
measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business combination. We adopted the provisions of FAS 141(R) effective January 1, 2009.
The adoption of FAS 141(R) had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or
financial statement disclosures.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161,
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (FAS 161). FAS 161 amends FAS No. 133 by requiring expanded disclosures about, but does
not change the accounting for, derivative instruments and hedging activities, including increased
qualitative, quantitative, and credit-risk disclosures. We adopted the provisions of FAS 161
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of FAS 161 had no effect on our financial position,
results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Useful Life of Intangible Assets In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure related to the
determination of intangible asset useful lives. We adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 142-3
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 had no effect on our financial position
or results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Participating Securities In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are
Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that unvested share-based
payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether
paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of earnings
per share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. We adopted
the provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1 effective January 1, 2009. All of our unvested restricted stock
awards contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends on a basis equal to our other common
stockholders. Accordingly, the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 increased our weighted average shares
outstanding at June 30, 2008 (for comparative purposes), and reduced our previously reported basic
and diluted earnings per share by $0.01 for each of the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2008.
Defensive Intangible Assets In November 2008 the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-7,
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets, or EITF 08-7. EITF 08-7 applies to defensive
intangible assets, which are acquired intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to
actively use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to them. As
these assets are separately identifiable, EITF 08-7 requires an acquiring entity to account for
defensive intangible assets as a separate unit of accounting, which should be amortized to expense
over the period the asset diminished in value. Defensive intangible assets must be recognized at
fair value in accordance with SFAS 141R and SFAS 157. We adopted the provisions of EITF 08-07
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of EITF 08-07
had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or financial statement
disclosures.
12
Fair Value Accounting Standards On April 9, 2009, the FASB adopted three new guidelines
under the so-called mark-to-market accounting rule, addressing concerns over the application of
fair value accounting standards given the current market conditions. We adopted all three guidance
standards effective June 30, 2009.
The first, FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly, allows companies to value assets at what they would sell for in an orderly sale, as
opposed to a forced or distressed sale. This includes certain hard-to-value troubled mortgages,
corporate loans, and consumer loans. The new rule establishes a process, by which companies look
at several factors and use their judgment to decide whether a formerly active market has become
inactive. If found to be inactive, a company must then determine if broker quotes, observed prices,
or a discounted cash flow analysis indicate distressed transactions. The adoption of FSB FAS 157-4
had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
The second, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (OTTI), changes the way companies are calculating OTTI for debt securities. Under FSP
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, recognition of OTTI is based on managements assertion it does not have
the intent to sell the debt instrument and it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the
debt instrument before recovery of its cost basis. As such, when adjusting the debt instrument to
fair value on the companys balance sheet, the credit component of an other-than-temporary
impairment of a debt security will be recorded through earnings and the remaining portion in other
comprehensive income. The credit portion of the change in fair value of the debt security is
measured on the basis of an entitys estimate of the decrease in expected cash flows. The adoption
of FSB FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or
financial statement disclosures.
The third, FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, increases the frequency of disclosures that provide qualitative and quantitative
information about fair value estimates for financial instruments not currently measured on the
balance sheet at fair value. The FSP now requires disclosures typically only reported in annual
report to be included in the quarterly reports. The FSP does not require any new disclosures
related to fair value estimates. The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 had no effect on our
financial position, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets In December 2008, the FASB
issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets, which
requires additional disclosures for employers pension and other postretirement benefit plan
assets. As pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets were not included within the scope
of FAS No. 157, FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires employers to disclose information about fair value
measurements of plan assets similar to the disclosures required under SFAS No. 157, the investment
policies and strategies for the major categories of plan assets, and significant concentrations of
risk within plan assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will be effective for us as of December 31, 2009. We do
not expect the adoption of this standard will have any impact on our financial position, results of
operations or financial statement disclosures.
Subsequent Events DisclosureIn May 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
(FAS 165), which requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and whether that represents the date the financial statements were issued or
were available to be issued. We adopted the provisions of FAS 165 effective June 30, 2009. In
accordance with the provisions of FAS 165, we have evaluated events subsequent to June 30, 2009
through August 6, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued.
13
Accounting for Transfers of Financial AssetsIn June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (FAS 166). FAS 166 is a revision to FAS No.
140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities, and will require more information about transfers of financial assets and where
companies have continuing exposure to the risk related to transferred financial assets. It
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosure. This standard is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We will adopt FAS 166 on January 1,
2010. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 166 will have any impact on our financial position,
results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Variable Interest EntitiesIn June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167). FAS 167 is intended to improve financial reporting by
providing additional guidance to companies involved with variable interest entities and by
requiring additional disclosures about a companys involvement in variable interest entities.
Under FAS No. 167, determining whether a company is required to consolidate an entity will be based
on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. FAS No.
167 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We will adopt FAS
167 on January 1, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 167 will have any impact on our
financial position, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Codification and Hierarchy of Accounting StandardsIn June 2009 the FASB issued FAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Standards (FAS 168). FAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. The Codification
will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. FAS 168 is effective in
the first interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. FAS 168 will have no effect
on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption other than current references to GAAP which
will be replaced with references to the applicable codification paragraphs.
3. Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is
computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and, when dilutive,
potential common shares from stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method. Diluted
earnings per share excludes the impact of potential common shares related to stock options and
warrants in periods in which we reported a loss from continuing operations or in which the option
or warrant exercise price is greater than the average market price of our common stock during the
period because the effect would be antidilutive. A total of 455,000 common shares issuable upon
the exercise of in-the-money stock options were excluded from the diluted weighted average number
of shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2009 because the net effects of
in-the-money stock options, unrecognized stock compensation costs, and tax benefits on nonqualified
stock options and time vesting restricted stock awards was antidilutive. A total of 416,000
common shares issuable upon the exercise of in-the-money stock options were excluded from the
diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2009
because their effect was antidilutive to our net loss.
14
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
attributable to PowerSecure International, Inc. common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Amounts attributable to PowerSecure International,
Inc. common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,892 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common
shares outstanding in period |
|
|
17,159 |
|
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
17,127 |
|
|
|
16,912 |
|
Add dilutive effects of stock
options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common
shares outstanding in period |
|
|
17,159 |
|
|
|
17,343 |
|
|
|
17,127 |
|
|
|
17,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per
common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per
common share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per
common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per
common share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. New Business Unit
On May 8 2009, our PowerSecure subsidiary established a new business unit, PowerPackages, LLC,
to provide our utility partners an efficient, dependable continuous power source for their
customers. The new business unit broadens our PowerSecure subsidiarys interactive distributed
generation system capabilities by utilizing medium speed engine technology as the systems power
source. To facilitate the new business unit, our PowerSecure subsidiary purchased certain
inventory and equipment of Design Power International, Inc. The fair value of the assets acquired
was $800, which also represents the purchase price of the assets. The following provides
additional information regarding the fair value of the assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
408 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
The operations of PowerPackages, LLC have been included within our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
operating segment from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations for the periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 have not been included herein as the effects of the acquisition were
not material to our results of operations.
15
5. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate
Through WaterSecure, we currently own 40.45% of MM 1995-2, which we account for under the
equity method. MM 1995-2 owns and operates five water processing and disposal facilities located
in northeastern Colorado. The balance of our equity investment in MM 1995-2 includes approximately
$785 and $822 of unamortized purchase premiums we paid on our acquired interests at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. The premiums are being amortized over a period of 14 years,
which represents the weighted average useful life of the underlying assets acquired.
The following table sets forth certain summarized financial information for MM 1995-2 at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
|
$ |
4,645 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
8,067 |
|
Total other assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
12,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,393 |
|
Long-term note payable |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
7,256 |
|
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
12,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
2,687 |
|
|
$ |
5,478 |
|
|
$ |
5,674 |
|
|
$ |
10,367 |
|
Total costs and
expenses |
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
|
$ |
6,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Debt
Line of Credit We have an existing credit agreement with Citibank, N.A., as the
administrative agent, along with SunTrust Bank and BB&T, providing for a $50 million senior,
first-priority secured revolving and term credit facility. The credit facility, as amended, is a
$50,000 senior, first-priority secured revolving credit facility that is guaranteed by all of our
active subsidiaries and secured by all of our assets and the assets of our active subsidiaries.
We may, from time to time, request an increase in the aggregate revolving commitment amount by
up to $15,000 without the prior consent of the lenders provided that each lender has the unilateral
right to determine whether it agrees to increase its revolving commitment and that no lender is
required to increase its individual pro rata commitment amount without such lenders consent.
16
The credit facility, as a revolving credit facility, matures and terminates on November 13,
2011. However, we have the option prior to that maturity date to convert a portion of outstanding
principal balance, in an amount not to exceed the present value of estimated annual contract
revenues receivable under the initial term of contracts for recurring revenue projects executed
after December 31, 2007, into a non-revolving term loan for a two year period expiring November 12,
2013, making quarterly payments based upon a four year fully amortized basis.
We intend to use the proceeds available under the credit facility to finance our PowerSecure
subsidiarys recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures, working
capital, acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. Our outstanding borrowings under the credit
facility at any time, the proceeds of which were used for working capital purposes and not in
connection with recurring revenue projects, cannot exceed $15,000.
Outstanding balances under the credit facility bear interest, at our discretion, at either the
London Interbank Offered Rate for the corresponding deposits of U. S. Dollars plus an applicable
margin, which is on a sliding scale ranging from 175 basis points to 300 basis points based upon
the our leverage ratio, or at Citibanks alternate base rate plus an applicable margin, on a
sliding scale ranging from 0 basis points to 125 basis points based upon our leverage ratio. Our
leverage ratio is the ratio of our funded indebtedness as of a given date to our consolidated
EBITDA as defined in the credit agreement for the four consecutive quarters ending on such date.
Citibanks alternate base rate is equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate as published by the
Federal Reserve of New York plus 0.50%, and Citibanks prime commercial lending rate.
The credit facility is not subject to any borrowing base computations or limitations, but does
contain certain financial covenants. Our maximum leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.25. Our minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio must be in excess of 1.50, where the fixed charge coverage ratio is
defined as the ratio of the aggregate of our trailing 12 month consolidated EBITDA plus our lease
or rent expense minus our taxes based on income and payable in cash, divided by the sum of our
consolidated interest charges plus our lease or rent expenses plus our scheduled principal payments
and dividends, computed over the previous period. Also, our minimum asset coverage must be in
excess of 1.25, where our asset coverage is defined as the summation of 80% of the book value of
accounts receivable plus 60% of the book value of inventory plus 50% of the book value of net fixed
assets, divided by total funded debt outstanding. In addition, we are required to maintain a
minimum consolidated tangible net worth, computed on a quarterly basis, equal to approximately
$42.8 million, plus 50% of our net income each year ending after December 31, 2007, with no
reduction for any net loss in any year, plus 100% of any equity we raise through the sale of equity
interests, less the amount of any non-cash charges or losses. Finally, our debt to worth ratio,
which is the ratio of our total consolidated indebtedness to our consolidated tangible net worth,
cannot exceed 1.5 to 1.0 at the end of any quarter. At June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with
these financial covenants.
Under the credit facility, our cumulative capital expenditures beginning in 2008 cannot exceed
the sum of $5,000 plus $1,250 per quarter, on a cumulative basis, plus an allowance for our
PowerSecure subsidiary recurring revenue projects generated after December 31, 2007. The credit
facility contains other representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants,
including restrictions with respect to liens, indebtedness, loans and investments, material changes
in our business, asset sales or leases or transfers of assets, restricted payments such as
distributions and dividends, mergers or consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
17
Upon the sale of any of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries other than in the
ordinary course of business or the public or private sale of any of our equity or debt or the
equity or debt of our subsidiaries other than equity issuances where the aggregate net equity
proceeds do not exceed $10,000, we are required to use the net proceeds thereof to repay any
indebtedness then outstanding under the credit facility, except for certain reinvestment
provisions.
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by guarantees and security agreements by
each of our active subsidiaries, including but not limited to our PowerSecure subsidiary, Southern
Flow and WaterSecure. The guarantees guaranty all of our obligations under the credit facility,
and the security agreements grant to the lenders a first priority security interest in virtually
all of the assets of each of the parties to the credit agreement.
The credit agreement also contains customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, judgment defaults and certain ERISA-related events.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no balances outstanding under the credit
facility and we had $50,000 available to borrow. However, the availability of this capital under
our credit facility includes restrictions on the use of proceeds, and is dependent upon our ability
to satisfy certain financial and operating covenants, as described above.
Equipment Line On July 22, 2008, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (Caterpillar)
renewed a line of credit to finance the purchase, from time to time, of Caterpillar generators to
be used in our PowerSecure subsidiarys projects, primarily those projects sold under the recurring
revenue model, pursuant to a letter by Caterpillar containing the terms of this credit line. The
line of credit was increased from its previous $7,500 level to $10,000. Under this line of credit,
our PowerSecure subsidiary may submit equipment purchases to Caterpillar for financing, and
Caterpillar may provide such financing in its discretion at an interest rate, for a period of time
between 12 and 60 months and upon such financing instruments, such as a promissory note or an
installment sales contract, as are set by Caterpillar on a project by project basis. The line of
credit expires on September 30, 2009 (subject to renewal, if requested by our PowerSecure
subsidiary and accepted by Caterpillar in its sole discretion), or at an earlier date upon notice
given by Caterpillar in its sole discretion. The letter setting forth the terms of the line of
credit confirms the intent of Caterpillar to finance equipment purchases by our PowerSecure
subsidiary, but is not an unconditional binding commitment to provide such financing. The line of
credit contains various customary provisions and is contingent upon the continued credit-worthiness
of our PowerSecure subsidiary in the sole discretion of Caterpillar. This line of credit from
Caterpillar is a permitted indebtedness under our credit facility with Citibank. At June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, there were no balances borrowed or outstanding under the equipment line of
credit with Caterpillar.
7. Capital Lease Obligations
In December 2008, we entered into a sale and leaseback transaction with SunTrust Equipment
Finance and Leasing, an affiliate of SunTrust bank, resulting in the sale of distributed generation
equipment placed in service at customer locations and a lease of the equipment from SunTrust. We
received $5,912 from the sale of the equipment which we are repaying under the terms of the lease
with monthly payments of $85 of principal and interest over a period of 84 months. At the
expiration of the term of the lease, we have the option to purchase the equipment for $1, assuming
no default under the lease by us has occurred and is then continuing. The lease is guaranteed by us under an
equipment lease guaranty. The lease and the lease guaranty constitute permitted indebtedness under
our current credit agreement, under which an affiliate of the lessor is one of the lenders.
18
We intend to use the proceeds of the lease financing to finance our PowerSecure subsidiarys
recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures and working capital. We
account for the lease financing as a capital lease in our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The lease provides our PowerSecure subsidiary with limited rights, subject to the lessors
approval which will not be unreasonably withheld, to relocate and substitute equipment during its
term. The lease contains customary representations and warranties, covenants relating to the use
and maintenance of the equipment, indemnification, events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, customary for leases of this nature. The lease also grants to the lessor
certain remedies upon a default, including the right to cancel the lease, to accelerate all rent
payments for the remainder of the term of the lease, to recover liquidated damages, or to repossess
and re-lease, sell or otherwise dispose of the equipment.
Under the lease guaranty, we have unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of our
PowerSecure subsidiary under the lease for the benefit of the lessor.
Capital lease obligations at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consist of our obligations
under the equipment lease described above as well as $5 of other lease obligations.
8. Share-Based Compensation
Stock Plans We have granted stock options and restricted stock awards to employees,
directors, advisors and consultants under various stock plans. We currently maintain two stock
plans. Under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the 1998 Stock Plan), we granted
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
performance awards and other stock-based awards to our officers, directors, employees, consultants
and advisors for shares of our common stock. Stock options granted under the 1998 Stock Plan
contained exercise prices not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant, and had a term of 10 years from the date of grant. Nonqualified stock option grants to our
directors under the 1998 Stock Plan generally vested over periods up to two years. Qualified stock
option grants to our employees under the 1998 Stock Plan generally vested over periods up to five
years. The 1998 Stock Plan expired on June 12, 2008, and no additional awards may be made under
the 1998 Stock Plan, although awards granted prior to such date will remain outstanding and subject
to the terms and conditions of those awards.
In March 2008, our board of directors adopted the PowerSecure International, Inc. 2008 Stock
Incentive Plan (the 2008 Stock Plan), which was approved by our stockholders at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on June 9, 2008. The 2008 Stock Plan authorizes our board of
directors to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, performance awards and other stock-based awards to our officers, directors,
employees, consultants and advisors for up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of our common stock.
Stock options granted under the 2008 Stock Plan must contain exercise prices not less than the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and must contain a term not in excess of 10
years from the date of grant. The 2008 Stock Plan replaced our 1998 Stock Plan.
19
Stock Options Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 includes $168
and $198, respectively, of pre-tax compensation costs related to outstanding stock options. Net
income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 includes $257 and $409, respectively,
of pre-tax compensation costs related to outstanding stock options. The after-tax compensation cost
of outstanding stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $157 and $250,
respectively. All of the stock option compensation expense is included in general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance, December 31,
2008 |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
6.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
11.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
5.09 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, June 30,
2009 |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance, December 31,
2007 |
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
$ |
5.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
12.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
13.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
$ |
5.63 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, June 30,
2008 |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
$ |
2.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of the options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $2.25 and $6.51, respectively.
In each case, the fair value was measured using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions:
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Expected stock price volatilility |
|
|
54.3 |
% |
|
|
60.3 |
% |
Risk Free interest rate |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
|
2.96 |
% |
Annual dividends |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expected life employee options |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
Expected life director options |
|
na |
|
na |
We amortize the fair value of stock option grants over their respective service periods using
the straight-line method and assuming a forfeiture rate of 5%. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31
2008, there was $1,036 and $1,453, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation costs related
to all of our outstanding stock options. These costs at June 30, 2009 are expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised was $2 and $452, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises during
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $8 and $362, respectively. The total grant date
fair value of stock options vested during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $253
and $395, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the total intrinsic value of stock options
exercised was $68 and $944, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $53 and $448, respectively. The total grant date fair value
of stock options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $436 and $627,
respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
includes $265 and $403, respectively, of pre-tax compensation costs related to outstanding
restricted stock awards. Net income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
includes $530 and $806, respectively, of pre-tax compensation costs related to outstanding
restricted stock awards. All of the restricted stock award compensation expense during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is included in general and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
A summary of restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
628 |
|
|
$ |
12.06 |
|
Granted |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
11.90 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
595 |
|
|
$ |
11.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
A summary of restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
641 |
|
|
$ |
12.48 |
|
Granted |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
12.34 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
619 |
|
|
$ |
12.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares are subject to forfeiture and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred until
they vest. If the holder of the restricted shares leaves us before the restricted shares vest,
other than due to termination by us without cause, then any unvested restricted shares will be
forfeited and returned to us. Restricted stock awards granted to directors vest in equal amounts
over a period of one or three years, depending on the nature of the grant. Restricted stock awards
granted to employees other than officers vest in equal annual amounts over five years. Restricted
stock awards granted to officers are scheduled to vest as follows:
|
|
|
A total of 300,000 restricted shares will cliff vest in their entirety on August
15, 2012, provided the officer remains employed with us through that date. |
|
|
|
|
A total of 22,500 restricted shares will cliff vest in their entirety on December
10, 2012, provided the officers remain employed with us through that date. |
|
|
|
|
The remaining 193,500 restricted shares vest in three equal annual installments,
commencing when our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 is
filed, but only upon the achievement of performance targets each year relating to our
net income for fiscal years 2009 through 2012. |
|
|
|
|
All restricted and unvested shares will automatically vest upon a change in
control. |
The fair value of the cliff vesting restricted shares is being amortized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period. The fair value of the performance vesting shares is expensed as the
achievement of the performance criteria becomes probable and the related service period conditions
are met. At June 30, 2009, the balance of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
restricted shares was $5,323, which, assuming all future performance criteria will be met, we
expect will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.5 years.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we hire employees that are subject to restrictive covenants, such as
non-competition agreements with their former employers. We comply, and require our employees to
comply, with the terms of all known restrictive covenants. However, we have in the past and may in
the future receive claims and demands by some former employers alleging actual or potential
violations of these restrictive covenants. While we do not believe any pending claims have merit,
we cannot provide any assurance of the outcome of these claims.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of business we encounter performance issues with key
component parts we utilize in our distributed generation systems, switchgear systems, utility
22
infrastructure products, and lighting products, such as engines, generators, alternators,
breakers, fuel systems, LED and other lighting technologies, and other complex electrical
components. While we strive to utilize high quality component parts from reputable suppliers, and
to back-up their quality and performance with manufacturers warranties, even the best parts and
components have performance issues from time to time, and these performance issues create
significant financial and operating risks to our business, operations and financial results. These
risks include the expense, time, focus and resources involved in repairing, replacing or modifying
distributed generation systems, switchgear systems and lighting systems for component part
malfunctions, whether or not covered under manufacturers warranties and the burden and costs we
would incur due to manufacturers disputing or failing to timely and fully honor their warranty
obligations for quality and performance issues. These risks also include the potential material
and adverse effects on our business, operations, reputation and financial results, including
reduced revenues, additional expenses and capital cost, and asset write-offs, due to the
cancellation or deferral of projects by our customers, or claims made by our customers for damages,
as a result of performance issues.
Although we believe our suppliers warranties generally cover these performance issues, from
time to time we face disputes with our suppliers with respect to those performance issues and their
warranty obligations, or the performance issues are not covered by manufacturers warranties, and
our customers may claim to incur damages as a result of those performance issues. In those cases,
we vigorously defend our position and rights, including our warranty rights, and we take all
commercially practical actions to ensure our customers are fully satisfied with the quality of our
products and services and do not incur any damages. As of the date of this report, we have
identified performance issues with approximately $5-10 million of manufacturers component parts
installed in distributed generation systems deployed at customers sites, and additional
performance issues could arise from time to time in the future. We are working collaboratively
with the manufacturers to resolve these issues. However, in the event the manufacturers solutions
do not fully satisfy the required performance standards, we could incur additional costs to
replace, rebuild, or repair these systems, as well as incur adverse material future financial
consequences related to the cancellation of customer contracts, including reduced revenues,
additional expenses and capital cost, and asset write-offs. In certain instances, these
performance issues could also result in customers claims for damages. We currently expect the
manufacturers to rectify these performance issues to meet our customers required performance
standards with minimal additional cost to us, however, we cannot provide any assurance that an
acceptable solution will be achieved in each case, or if a solution is achieved the timing or costs
to us associated with such solutions. Additionally, the outcome of any warranty claims is
inherently difficult to predict due to the uncertainty of technical solutions, cost, customer
requirements, and the uncertainty inherent in litigation and disputes generally, and thus there is
no assurance we will not be adversely affected by these, or other performance issues with key parts
and components. In addition, the mere existence of performance issues, even if finally resolved
with our suppliers, can have an adverse effect on our reputation for quality, which could adversely
affect our business. Accordingly, potential negative financial impacts from these items cannot be
estimated at this time.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. We intend to vigorously defend all claims against us. Although the ultimate
outcome of these claims cannot be accurately predicted due to the inherent uncertainty of
litigation, in the opinion of management, based upon current information, no other currently
pending or overtly threatened dispute is expected to have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
23
10. Income Taxes
No current benefit for federal income taxes has been recorded for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 due to our history of taxable losses, current valuation allowance and lack of
seasonal patterns to support utilization of losses incurred during the period. The tax provision
recorded at June 30, 2009 is our best estimate of our tax expense taking into consideration our
expectation of future earnings, federal alternative minimum tax, state income tax for state
jurisdictions in which we expect taxable income, and our valuation allowance.
11. Segment Information
Our operating segments represent components of our business for which discrete financial
information is available and is reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or
decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. We conduct our
operations through two operating segments: Energy and Smart Grid Solutions, and Energy Services.
Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services and
serve different customer bases. They are managed separately because each business requires
different technology and marketing strategies. Previously, we were also engaged in a third
business segment, Automated Energy Data Collection and Telemetry conducted through our MGM
subsidiary. That segment of our business has been discontinued and the results of its operations
are excluded from our segment information below.
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions Through our PowerSecure subsidiary we serve utilities and
commercial, institutional, and industrial customers in the areas of Interactive Distributed
Generation®, Utility Infrastructure and Energy Efficiency. Each of these PowerSecure subsidiary
business units operates in a distinct market with distinct technical disciplines, but shares a
common customer base with our PowerSecure subsidiary products and services and which we intend to
grow through shared resources and customer relationships. Accordingly, these units are included
within our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment results; and
Energy Services Through our Southern Flow and WaterSecure subsidiaries we serve customers
in the oil and natural gas production business with our measurement services and products, and
water processing and disposal services. Southern Flows services include on-site field services,
chart processing and analysis, laboratory analysis, and data management and reporting. These
services are provided principally to customers involved in natural gas production, gathering,
transportation and processing. WaterSecure, through its equity investment MM 1995-2, provides
water processing and disposal for oil and natural gas producers.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate the performance of our operating
segments based on Income (loss) before income taxes. Intersegment sales are not significant.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we changed the composition of our reportable segments to
include the management fees and equity income of our WaterSecure operations within our Energy
Services segment. Previously, our WaterSecure operations were not included in our segment
activity. The segment activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 has been
reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following
table. Unallocated corporate cost amounts include corporate overhead and related items including
restructuring charges, other income and assets of discontinued operations which, for purposes of
evaluating
the operations of our segments, are not allocated to our segment activities. Total asset amounts
exclude intercompany receivable balances eliminated in consolidation.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Energy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smart Grid |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
20,671 |
|
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,135 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7,042 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative |
|
|
4,308 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
6,006 |
|
Selling,
marketing and
service |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
969 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
Research and
development |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
5,808 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
7,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
651 |
|
Other income and
(expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
Equity income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
Interest and
other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Interest and
finance charges |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
(1,229 |
) |
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
expenditures |
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in
unconsolidated
affiliate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
77,882 |
|
|
$ |
15,912 |
|
|
$ |
16,831 |
|
|
$ |
110,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Energy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smart Grid |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
37,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,894 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,952 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
24,768 |
|
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,290 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative |
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
Selling, marketing
and service |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
Reasearch and
development |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
8,210 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
10,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
3,786 |
|
Other income and
(expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
Equity income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
Interest and other
income |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Interest and
finance charges |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
$ |
4,062 |
|
|
$ |
2,341 |
|
|
$ |
(1,159 |
) |
|
$ |
5,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
expenditures |
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in
unconsolidated
affiliate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,269 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
83,919 |
|
|
$ |
16,362 |
|
|
$ |
10,571 |
|
|
$ |
110,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Energy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smart Grid |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
35,886 |
|
|
$ |
8,969 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44,855 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
24,070 |
|
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
11,816 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative |
|
|
8,701 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
12,026 |
|
Selling,
marketing and
service |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
Reasearch and
development |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
11,508 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
(2,313 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
Other income and
(expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
Equity income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
Interest and
other income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Interest and
finance charges |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
|
$ |
(2,359 |
) |
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
expenditures |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Energy and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smart Grid |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
66,164 |
|
|
$ |
9,363 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,527 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
45,071 |
|
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21,093 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative |
|
|
11,276 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
14,796 |
|
Selling, marketing
and service |
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
Reasearch and
development |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
15,415 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
19,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
5,678 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
(2,594 |
) |
|
|
4,762 |
|
Other income and
(expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
Equity income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
Interest and other
income |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Interest and
finance charges |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
$ |
5,664 |
|
|
$ |
4,206 |
|
|
$ |
(2,362 |
) |
|
$ |
7,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
expenditures |
|
$ |
15,084 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, which we refer to as the second quarter 2009 and six
month period 2009, respectively, and the three and six month period ended June 30, 2008, which we
refer to as the second quarter 2008 and six month period 2008, respectively, and of our
consolidated financial condition as of June 30, 2009 should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
PowerSecure International, Inc., based in Wake Forest, North Carolina, is a leading provider
of Energy and Smart Grid Solutions to electric utilities, and their commercial, institutional, and
industrial customers. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment provides products and services
in the areas of Interactive Distributed Generation® (IDG®), Utility Infrastructure, and
Energy Efficiency, and our Energy Services segment provides services to the oil and natural gas
industry through our Southern Flow and WaterSecure business units.
Through our PowerSecure, Inc. subsidiary we operate our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment and focus on three of these areas: Interactive Distributed Generation®, Utility
Infrastructure, and Energy Efficiency. Our core Interactive Distributed Generation® business
involves installing sophisticated electric generation equipment directly at the location where
power is utilized. This equipment provides a dependable backup power supply during power outages,
while at the same time providing a more efficient and environmentally friendly means of delivering
power during high cost periods of peak power demand. Our intelligent Interactive Distributed
Generation® systems contain sophisticated electronic controls, which enables our systems to be
monitored 24x7 by our Smart Grid Monitoring Center, safeguarding our customers from power outages
and their related costs. Through this monitoring center, we utilize our proprietary smart grid
capabilities to forecast utilities peak demand periods, and electronically deploy our systems to
deliver more efficient and environmentally friendly power during these periods of peak demand. Our
systems also enable utilities to delay new infrastructure investments for transmitting and
distributing power, and minimize energy losses associated with moving electricity over long
distances.
Our Utility Infrastructure business is dedicated to helping utilities design and build
infrastructure to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our nations electric grid, including
transmission and distribution system upgrades, installation of advanced metering and efficient
lighting, and emergency storm restoration. Additionally, we provide utilities with a wide range
of engineering and design services, and consulting services for regulatory and rate design matters.
Our Energy Efficiency business is focused on providing lighting solutions for commercial,
industrial, and institutional customers, including our state-of-the-art green EfficientLights LED
lighting technology for refrigerated cases in grocery and retail drug stores.
27
Our Energy Services segment includes our Southern Flow Companies, Inc. and WaterSecure
Holdings, Inc. subsidiaries, and the focus of this segment is on business opportunities in the
energy services field.
Our Southern Flow subsidiary provides natural gas measurement services to customers involved
the business of oil and natural gas production, transportation and processing, with a focus on the
natural gas market. WaterSecure owns approximately 40% of the equity interests in MM 1995-2, our
WaterSecure operations, an unconsolidated business. Our WaterSecure operations provide water
processing and disposal services at its facilities in northeastern Colorado.
Recent Developments
On May 8, 2009, our PowerSecure subsidiary established a new business unit, PowerPackages,
LLC, to provide our utility partners an efficient, dependable continuous power source for its
customers. The new business unit broadens our PowerSecure subsidiarys interactive distributed
generation system capabilities by utilizing medium speed engine technology as the systems power
source. To facilitate the new business unit, our PowerSecure subsidiary purchased the inventory
and equipment of Design Power International, Inc. The fair value of the assets acquired was $800,
which also represents the purchase price of the assets.
To complement our project-based Interactive Distributed Generation® sales model, we
have implemented a recurring revenue business model, which is our marketing and business strategy
that is designed to generate long-term revenues by generating a base of revenues that recur on an
annual basis from ongoing, long-term distributed generation projects. Since late 2007, this
strategy has generated several new long-term recurring revenue contracts with utility partners and
their customers under which we provide them with efficient standby power and access to reliable
distributed generation assets during peak power periods for a number of years, typically five to
fifteen years, and receive revenues in each of those years. As we create an increased number of
recurring revenue projects, we expect to receive an increased and more stable base of future
revenue, profit and cash flow. The development of these recurring revenue projects requires a
substantial increase in our capital expenditures, utilizes cash flow from operations, and, if
needed, debt and lease financing, and also extends revenue and profit recognition over longer
periods compared to our traditional project-based sales, where revenue and profit is recognized as
the projects are completed. Accordingly, as these long-term recurring revenue projects become an
increasing portion of our overall projects and business, we will have a need for more capital in
the short-term to finance these recurring revenue projects, with the anticipated goal of greater
and more stable future revenues with higher gross margins. During the six month period 2009, we
incurred approximately $1.7 million in total capital expenditures, including $1.2 million invested
in capital expenditures for PowerSecure-owned distributed generation systems to generate future
recurring revenue and profit under recurring revenue contracts.
Due to a decrease in revenues in our PowerSecure and Southern Flow subsidiaries, our
consolidated revenues during the second quarter 2009 decreased by $16.8 million, representing a
40.1% decrease compared to our second quarter 2008 consolidated revenues. The decrease in revenues
in the second quarter 2009 over the second quarter 2008 was attributable to a decline in revenues
from Publix, our largest customer in the prior year period, along with the combination of the
continued difficult economic environment, the uncertain regulatory environment, and the crisis in
the capital markets which reduced capital spending by our customers. In anticipation of lower
revenues in light of very difficult current economic conditions and the capital markets crisis, we
initiated measures during the third quarter of 2008 as well as during the first and second quarters
of 2009 to control our costs, such as staff reductions and
28
compensation measures such as cutbacks in certain bonus plans and other employee incentives, and other sales and general and administrative spending reductions. As a
result, our total operating expenses during the second quarter 2009 decreased by $2.4 million, or
24.1%, compared to our second quarter 2008 operating expenses. We expect these cost reduction
measures to continue over the near-term in order to address the negative effects of the current
economic recession on our business. Over the long-term, however, we expect to continue to invest
in operational infrastructure and sales and new business development to drive and support our
growth. As a result of decreased prices and volumes in the oil and gas markets, our second quarter
2009 management fees and equity income from the WaterSecure operations decreased by a combined $0.9
million compared to the second quarter 2008. Overall, our income from continuing operations and
net income was $1.0 million during the second quarter 2009, as compared to income from continuing
operations and net income of $4.9 million during the second quarter 2008.
Due to a decrease in revenues in our PowerSecure and Southern Flow subsidiaries, our
consolidated revenues during the six month period 2009 decreased by $30.7 million, representing a
40.6% decrease compared to our six month period 2008 consolidated revenues. The decrease in
revenues in the six month period 2009 over the six month period 2008 was attributable to the same
factors attributable to the decrease in revenues during the second quarter 2009 compared to the
second quarter 2008 discussed above. As a result of our cost reduction measures described above, our
total operating expenses during the six month period 2009 decreased by $4.0 million, or 21.2%,
compared to our six month period 2008 operating expenses. As a result of decreased prices and
volumes in the oil and gas markets, our six month period 2009 management fees and equity income
from the WaterSecure operations decreased by a combined $1.4 million compared to the six month
period 2008. Overall, our loss from continuing operations was less than $0.1 million during the
six month period 2009, as compared to income from continuing operations of $6.9 million during the
six month period 2008. Our net loss was less than $0.1 million during the six month period 2009,
as compared to net income of $6.8 million during the six month period 2008, which included a loss
from discontinued operations of $0.1 million.
As discussed below under Fluctuations, our financial results will fluctuate from quarter
to quarter and year to year. Thus, there is no assurance that our past results, including the
results of our year ended December 31, 2008 or our quarter and six month periods ended June 30,
2009, will be indicative of our future results, especially in light of the current significant
downturn in the economy and crisis negatively affecting the credit and capital markets.
Backlog
As
of the date this report is filed, our revenue backlog expected to be recognized after June 30,
2009 is $88 million. This includes revenue related to new business announcements made by us on
June 22 and July 20, 2009, and is $1 million more than the $87 million of revenue backlog we
reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 filed on May 7, 2009. Our revenue
backlog and the estimated timing of revenue recognition is outlined below, including project-based
revenues expected to be recognized as projects are completed and recurring revenues expected to
be recognized over the life of the contracts:
29
Revenue backlog to be recognized after June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anticipated |
|
Estimated Primary |
Description |
|
Revenue |
|
Recognition Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project-based RevenueNear term
|
|
$38 Million
|
|
3Q09 through 1Q10 |
Project-based RevenueLong term
|
|
$18 Million
|
|
2Q10 through 2011 |
Recurring Revenue
|
|
$32 Million
|
|
3Q09 through 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog to be recognized after June 30, 2009
|
|
$88 Million |
|
|
Note: Anticipated revenue and primary recognition periods are estimates subject risks and uncertainties and subject to change.
Consistent with past practice, these revenue backlog amounts are not intended to constitute the Companys total revenue over the indicated
time periods, as the Company has additional, regular on-going revenues. Examples of additional, regular recurring revenues include revenues
from our Southern Flow business, UtilityEngineering and PowerServices engineering fees, monitoring and maintenance revenue, among others.
Orders in our backlog are subject to delay, deferral, acceleration, resizing, or cancellation
from time to time by our customers, subject to contractual rights. Given the irregular sales cycle
of customer orders, and especially of large orders, our revenue backlog at any given time is not
necessarily an accurate indication of our future revenues.
Operating Segments
We conduct our operations through two operating segments: Energy and Smart Grid Solutions,
and Energy Services. Our reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different
products and services and serve different customer bases. They are managed separately because each
business requires different technology and marketing strategies. Previously, we were also engaged
in a third business segment, Automated Energy Data Collection and Telemetry conducted through our
Metretek Florida subsidiary. That segment of our business has been discontinued and the results of
its operations are reported as discontinued operations.
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
Through our PowerSecure subsidiary we serve utilities and commercial, institutional, and
industrial customers in the areas of Interactive Distributed Generation®, Utility
Infrastructure and Energy Efficiency. Each of these PowerSecure subsidiary business units operates
in a distinct market with distinct technical disciplines, but share a common customer base with our
PowerSecure subsidiary products and services and which we intend to grow through shared resources
and customer relationships. Accordingly, these units are included within our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment results.
Energy Services
Through our Southern Flow and WaterSecure subsidiaries we serve customers in the oil and
natural gas production business with our measurement services and products, and water processing
and disposal services. Southern Flows services include on-site field services, chart processing
and analysis, laboratory analysis, and data management and reporting. These services are provided
principally to customers involved in natural gas production, gathering, transportation and
processing. WaterSecure, through its equity investment in MM 1995-2, provides water processing and
disposal for oil and natural gas producers.
30
Results of Operations
The following discussion regarding segment revenues, gross profit, costs and expenses, and
other income and expenses for the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008 excludes
revenues, gross profit, and costs and expenses of discontinued operations.
Second Quarter 2009 Compared to Second Quarter 2008
Revenues
Our segment revenues are generated entirely by sales and services provided by our PowerSecure
subsidiary (Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment) and our Southern Flow subsidiary (Energy
Services segment). The following table summarizes our segment revenues for the periods indicated
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
20,671 |
|
|
$ |
37,058 |
|
|
$ |
(16,387 |
) |
|
|
-44.2 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
4,464 |
|
|
|
4,894 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
-8.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,135 |
|
|
$ |
41,952 |
|
|
$ |
(16,817 |
) |
|
|
-40.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated revenues for the second quarter 2009 decreased $16.8 million, or 40.1%,
compared to the second quarter 2008 due primarily to a decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment revenues, together with a smaller decrease in sales and service revenues of our
Energy Services segment.
Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment distributed generation revenues are very heavily
affected by the number, size and timing of our Interactive Distributed Generation®
projects as well as the percentage of completion of in-process projects, and the percentage of
turn-key as opposed to recurring revenue projects. Our Interactive Distributed
Generation® sales have fluctuated significantly in the past and are expected to continue
to fluctuate significantly in the future. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues
decreased by $16.4 million, or 44.2%, during the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter
2008. The decrease in those revenues in the second quarter 2009 over the second quarter 2008 was
attributable to a decline in revenues from Publix, our largest customer in the prior period,
partially offset by an increase in revenues from our other customers. The following table
summarizes our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment project-based revenues from Publix and from
all other customers for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Publix projects |
|
$ |
2,097 |
|
|
$ |
19,226 |
|
|
$ |
(17,129 |
) |
|
|
-89.1 |
% |
Revenues from all other customers |
|
|
18,574 |
|
|
|
17,832 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,671 |
|
|
$ |
37,058 |
|
|
$ |
(16,387 |
) |
|
|
-44.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publix as a percentage of total Energy and
Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
51.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The overall decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues during the second
quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008 of $16.4 million was driven by a $17.1 million
decrease in revenues from Publix partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in project-based
revenues from customers other than Publix. The 89.1% decline in revenues from Publix is due to the
completion in 2008 of the majority of the Publix distributed generation systems awarded to us. The
4.2% increase in sales to customers other than Publix was primarily the result of increased
revenues from our EfficientLights LED lighting technology products and services. Notwithstanding
increases in revenues from our LED lighting products and services, the economic downturn and the
liquidity crisis continues to negatively affect the demand for our products and services and the
ability of potential customers to finance the purchase of our products and services.
The future level of our revenues will depend on the timing and degree of the recovery of the
domestic economy, the health of the credit markets and the return to pre-recession customer
spending for capital improvements and energy efficiency, as well as our ability to secure new
significant purchase orders. The level and timing of our future revenues will also be affected by
the amount and proportion of revenues coming from recurring revenue projects in the future, which
results in revenue being recognized over a longer period.
We expect that, in 2009 and beyond, revenues from Publix will continue to constitute a smaller
portion of our total revenues than in recent years because we have completed the majority of the
Publix distributed generation systems awarded to us, and our anticipated future projects from
Publix will generally be implemented over a longer time period, and will be smaller in absolute
amount. At present, management expects future Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues
will continue to be negatively impacted by current economic conditions, including the lack of
availability of credit which makes it difficult for certain of our customers to finance the
purchase of our systems. In addition, some of our customers have indicated they are deferring
capital expenditures until economic conditions show indications of improvement. As a result,
management expects our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues to remain depressed in
2009, and perhaps beyond, depending on how quickly economic conditions stabilize and customers
resume pre-recession spending on capital improvements and energy efficiency.
Our Energy Services segment sales and service revenue decreased 8.8%, during the second
quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008, due to a combined decrease in field and
service related revenues together with a decrease in equipment sales. The recent decline in market
conditions in the oil and gas sector negatively affected our Energy Services segment sales and
service revenue during the second quarter 2009, and we expect low natural gas prices to continue to
negatively affect our Energy Services segment in the foreseeable future. In addition, our Energy
Services revenues are significantly
32
affected by severe weather conditions, the extent of which is unpredictable for any particular period. See Fluctuations below.
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margins
Our segment gross profit represents our revenues less our cost of sales. Our segment gross
profit margin represents our gross profit divided by our revenues. The following tables summarizes
our segment costs of sales along with our segment gross profits and gross profit margins for the
periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Cost of Sales and Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
13,629 |
|
|
$ |
24,768 |
|
|
$ |
(11,139 |
) |
|
|
-45.0 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
3,251 |
|
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
-3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,880 |
|
|
$ |
28,152 |
|
|
$ |
(11,272 |
) |
|
|
-40.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
7,042 |
|
|
$ |
12,290 |
|
|
$ |
(5,248 |
) |
|
|
-42.7 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
-19.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,255 |
|
|
$ |
13,800 |
|
|
$ |
(5,545 |
) |
|
|
-40.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Gross Profit Margins: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of sales and services include materials, personnel and related overhead costs incurred
to manufacture products and provide services. The 40.0% decrease in our consolidated cost of sales
and services for the second quarter 2009, compared to the second quarter 2008, was attributable
almost entirely to the costs avoided associated with the 40.1% decrease in sales.
The 45.0% decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment cost of sales and services
in the second quarter 2009 was driven by a 44.2% decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment sales and services revenue, together with factors leading to the improvement in our Energy
and Smart Grid Solutions segment gross profit margin. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment
gross profit decreased $5.2 million, or 42.7%, in the second quarter 2009, compared to the second
quarter 2008. Additionally, our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment gross profit margin
increased by 0.9 percentage points in the second quarter 2009 over the second quarter 2008, to
34.1%. A total of $5.4 million of the gross profit decrease was driven by the decline in our
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segments revenue, partially offset by the positive effects of a
$0.2 million reduction in costs taken in response to anticipated negative economic conditions
affecting our sales. Specific cost reduction measures taken in 2009 include reductions in
construction personnel and other operational spending reductions.
The 3.9% decrease in our Energy Services segment costs of sales and services in the second
quarter 2009 is primarily the result of the costs associated with the 8.8% decrease in its sales
and service revenues, together with factors that resulted in a decline in our Energy Services
segment gross profit
33
margin. Our Energy Services segment gross profit margin decreased to 27.2% for the second
quarter 2009, compared to 30.9% during the second quarter 2008. The decline in our Energy Services
segment gross profit margin was due to inefficiencies in the utilization of field personnel due to
the lower revenues, additional field service vehicle costs, and an increase in small tools and
parts costs in the second quarter 2009 as compared to the second quarter 2008. During the second
quarter 2009, our Southern Flow subsidiary took additional actions to reduce personnel costs in
response to the decline in sales and service revenues. The effects of these cost reductions were
not fully realized during the second quarter 2009.
Our gross profit and gross profit margin have been, and we expect will continue to be,
affected by many factors, including the following:
|
|
|
The absolute level of revenue achieved in any particular period, given that portions
of our cost of sales are relatively fixed over the near-term; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to improve our operating efficiency and benefit from economies of scale; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to manage our materials and labor costs; |
|
|
|
|
The geographic density of our projects; |
|
|
|
|
The mix of higher and lower margin products and services; |
|
|
|
|
The selling price of our products and services; |
|
|
|
|
The price of oil and natural gas, the financial health of our customer base, and the
level of new oil and natural gas production activity in our operating geography; |
|
|
|
|
The rate of growth of our new businesses, which tend to incur costs in excess of
revenues in their earlier phases and then become profitable and more efficient over
time if they are successful; and |
|
|
|
|
Other factors described below under Fluctuations. |
Some of these factors are not within our control, and we cannot provide any assurance that we
can continue to improve upon those factors that are within our control, especially given the
current economic climate as well as our movement to an expected higher percentage of recurring
revenue projects. Moreover, our gross revenues are likely are likely to fluctuate from quarter to
quarter and from year to year, as discussed in Fluctuations below. Accordingly, there is no
assurance that our future gross profit margins will improve or even remain at recent levels in the
future, and will likely decrease if revenues continue to decrease.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses include general and administrative expense, selling, marketing and
service expense, depreciation and amortization, and research and development. The following table
sets forth our consolidated operating expenses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Consolidated Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
7,553 |
|
|
$ |
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
-20.5 |
% |
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
-48.7 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,604 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
(2,410 |
) |
|
|
-24.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to personnel, including wages, stock compensation, bonuses and commissions, are
the most significant component of our operating expenses. During 2008, we expanded our investment
in personnel driven by our high levels of revenue, diversification investments in new businesses,
and high levels of projects. In anticipation of the current economic recession and in anticipation
of a decline in revenues during a significant portion of 2009, we took measures during the third
quarter of 2008, and again in the first and second quarters of 2009 to control our costs and reduce
our operating expenses. These measures included staff reductions and compensation measures such as
reductions in certain bonus plans and other employee incentives, and other sales and general and
administrative spending reductions. We expect these cost reduction measures to continue over the
near-term in order to address the negative effects of the current economic downturn on our
business. Over the long-term, however, we expect demand for our business to expand allowing us to
grow our business and to invest in future business opportunities.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include personnel
wages, benefits, stock compensation, and bonuses and related overhead costs for the support and
administrative functions. The 20.5% decrease in our consolidated general and administrative
expenses in the second quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008, was due to cost
reductions in corporate expenses and staff reductions and other measures taken at our Energy and
Smart Grid Solutions segment to control and reduce our costs. The following table provides further
detail of our general and administrative expenses by segment (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment G&A Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
2,772 |
|
|
$ |
3,850 |
|
|
$ |
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
-28.0 |
% |
Vehicle lease and rental |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
-29.7 |
% |
Insurance |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Rent-office and equipment |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
-6.3 |
% |
Professional fees and consulting |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
-8.9 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
-32.1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
-30.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
-3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
7,553 |
|
|
$ |
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
-20.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
The decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment personnel costs during the second
quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008, was due to staff reductions and other actions
taken to reduce costs in anticipation of a decrease in revenues at our PowerSecure subsidiary.
Other general and administrative expenses including vehicle lease and rental, professional and
consulting fees, travel and other expenses decreased as a result of our specific cost reduction
efforts. We expect our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions general and administrative expenses to
remain consistent from our second quarter 2009 levels in the near-term as we continue to manage the
effects of the current economic recession on our business. Over the long-term, we expect our
expenses in these areas to increase at our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment as we return to
investing and supporting long-term growth.
Our Energy Services segment general and administrative expenses include similar personnel and
related overhead costs incurred for the support and administrative functions of our Energy Services
segment. The slight decrease in our Energy Services segment general and administrative expense
during the second quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008 was due to similar cost
reduction initiatives taken in anticipation of a decrease in revenues at our Southern Flow
subsidiary. We expect general and administrative expenses at our Energy Services segment to
stabilize or decline slightly from current levels over the near-term. Over the long-term, we
expect recent growth initiatives implemented in our Southern Flow subsidiary will increase its
revenue growth and expand its markets and business opportunities and will likely result in
increased general and administrative expenses in the future.
Unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses include similar personnel costs as
described above as well as costs incurred for the benefit of all of our business operations, such
as legal, Sarbanes-Oxley, public company reporting, director expenses, accounting costs, and stock
compensation expense on our stock options and restricted stock grants which we do not allocate to
our operating segments. Overall, these costs decreased during the second quarter 2009 as compared
to the second quarter 2008 due to a decline in bonus expense and a reduction of stock compensation
expense.
Selling, Marketing and Service Expenses. Selling, marketing and service expenses consist of
personnel and related overhead costs, including commissions for sales and marketing activities,
together with travel, advertising and promotion costs. The 48.7% decrease in selling, marketing
and service expenses in the second quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008, was due to
reductions in sales compensation expense driven by the current period decline in revenues,
advertising and promotion, travel, and a decrease in bad debt expense at our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment. The following table provides further detail of our segment selling, marketing
and service expenses (dollars in thousands):
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Selling, Marketing and Service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
|
-19.8 |
% |
Commission |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
-65.3 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
-18.7 |
% |
Advertising and promotion |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
-36.1 |
% |
Bad debt expense (recovery) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
-90.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
$ |
(920 |
) |
|
|
-48.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, we expect our near-term Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment selling,
marketing and services expenses to stabilize at current levels in the near-term as we continue to
manage our costs and have lower commission expense due to lower revenues as a result of the current
economic recession, but increase in the long-term to reflect, drive, and support future growth.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses include the
depreciation of property, plant and equipment and the amortization of certain intangible assets
including capitalized software development costs and other intangible assets. The $36, or 6.8%,
overall increase in depreciation and amortization expenses in the second quarter 2009, as compared
to the second quarter 2008, primarily reflects capital investments at both our Energy and Smart
Grid Solutions segment and our Energy Services segment throughout 2008 and early 2009. As a
result, we incurred a $28, or 49.1% increase in depreciation and amortization expenses at our
Energy Services segment and a $9, or 1.9%, increase at our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment
in the second quarter 2009, compared to the second quarter 2008.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses include the cost of
materials and payments to consultants related to product design and development at our Energy and
Smart Grid Solutions segment. The slight increase in research and development expenses in the
second quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008, reflects an increase in normal product
design and prototype costs for certain technologies incurred in each of the respective quarters in
2009 and 2008.
Other Income and Expenses
Our other income and expenses include management fees and equity income earned by our Energy
Services segment as managing trustee of MM 1995-2 relating to the WaterSecure operations, interest
income, interest expense and income taxes. The following table sets forth our other income and
expenses for the periods indicated, by segment (dollars in thousands):
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Other Segment Income and (Expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
Interest and finance charges |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
185.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
-40.2 |
% |
Equity income |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
-67.3 |
% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
-63.1 |
% |
Interest and finance charges |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
-172.0 |
% |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
$ |
(788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income for each segment consists of interest we
earn on the interest-bearing portion of our cash and cash equivalent balances. In total, interest
and other income decreased $0.1 million during the second quarter 2009, as compared to the second
quarter 2008. This decrease was attributable to a decline in our interest income resulting from
both a decline in our interest-bearing cash and cash equivalent balances as well as declining
interest rates earned on our cash and cash equivalent balances in the second quarter 2009 compared
to the second quarter 2008. Our future interest income will depend on our interest-bearing cash
and cash equivalent balances, which will increase and decrease depending upon our profit, capital
expenditures, and our working capital needs, and future interest rates.
Interest and Finance Charges. Interest and finance charges for each segment consists of
interest and finance charges on our credit facilities and capital leases. In total, interest and
finance charges increased $.01 million during the second quarter 2009, as compared to the second
quarter 2008. The increase in our unallocated corporate interest and finance charges reflects the
unused revolving credit facility fee and amortization of our finance charges incurred on our credit
facility. The increase in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment interest and finance charges
reflects interest and amortized finance charges on a $5.9 million capital lease obligation which we
entered into in December 2008 to finance certain recurring revenue projects. We expect our future
interest and finance charges to increase over time as a result of anticipated borrowings under our
credit facility to fund anticipated future recurring revenue projects at our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment.
Management Fees. Management fees at our Energy Services segment consist entirely of fees we
earn as the managing trustee of the WaterSecure operations. These fees, to a large extent, are
based on a percentage of the revenues of the WaterSecure operations. Due to the continued economic
downturn and the significant reduction in oil prices during early 2009 compared to 2008, the
current market conditions in the oil and gas sector have substantially weakened in 2009 compared to
2008 and have negatively affected the revenues of the WaterSecure operations in 2009. As a direct
result, our Energy Services segment management fees decreased in the second quarter 2009 by 40.2%
compared to the second quarter 2008.
38
Equity Income. Equity income at our Energy Services segment consists of our minority
ownership interest in the earnings of the WaterSecure operations. Our equity income is a direct
function of the net income of the WaterSecure operations as well as changes in our ownership
interest. During the second quarter 2009, our equity income decreased by $0.9 million, or 67.3%,
over the second quarter 2008. The performance of the WaterSecure operations, and our related
equity income, was negatively affected by soft market conditions in the oil and gas sector
generally, and in the region in which it operates during the second quarter 2009. Accordingly,
notwithstanding a small increase in our ownership interest that was acquired in July 2008, our
equity income decreased during the second quarter 2009, as compared to the second quarter 2008.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
(FAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (FAS 109), and Financial Accounting Standard Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). Under the provisions of FAS 109, a deferred tax liability or
asset (net of a valuation allowance) is provided in our financial statements by applying the
provisions of applicable laws to measure the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences
that will result in net taxable or deductible amounts in future years as a result of events
recognized in the financial statements in the current or preceding years. Our income tax benefit
or provision includes the effects of changes in the valuation allowance for our net deferred tax
asset, state income taxes in various state jurisdictions in which we have taxable activities,
federal alternative minimum tax, expenses associated with uncertain tax positions that we have
taken or expense reductions from tax positions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations. The decrease in our the second quarter 2009 income tax provision compared to our the
second quarter 2008 income tax provision was due to the decline in our net income during second
quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008, and the resulting decreases in both our federal
alternative minimum tax and state income tax.
Six Month Period 2009 Compared to Six Month Period 2008
Revenues
The following table summarizes our segment revenues for the periods indicated (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
35,886 |
|
|
$ |
66,164 |
|
|
$ |
(30,278 |
) |
|
|
-45.8 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
8,969 |
|
|
|
9,363 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
-4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
44,855 |
|
|
$ |
75,527 |
|
|
$ |
(30,672 |
) |
|
|
-40.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated revenues for the six month period 2009 decreased $30.7 million, or 40.6%,
compared to the six month period 2008 due primarily to a decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment revenues, together with a smaller decrease in sales and service revenues of our
Energy Services segment.
39
Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment distributed generation revenues are very heavily
affected by the number, size and timing of our Interactive Distributed Generation®
projects as well as the percentage of completion of in-process projects, and the percentage of
turn-key as opposed to recurring revenue projects. Our Interactive Distributed
Generation® sales have fluctuated significantly in the past and are expected to continue
to fluctuate significantly in the future. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues
decreased by $30.3 million, or 45.8%, during the six month period 2009 compared to the six month
period 2008. The decrease in those revenues in the six month period 2009 over the six month period
2008 was attributable to a decline in revenues from Publix, our largest customer, along with the
combination of the difficult economic environment, the uncertain regulatory environment, and the
crisis in the capital markets which reduced capital spending by our customers. The decline in
revenues from Publix is due to the completion in 2008 of the majority of the Publix distributed
generation systems awarded to us. The continued economic downturn and the liquidity crisis
negatively affected the demand for our products and services and the ability of potential customers
to finance the purchase of our products and services.
The following table summarizes our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment project-based
revenues from Publix and from all other customers for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Publix projects |
|
$ |
4,139 |
|
|
$ |
33,091 |
|
|
$ |
(28,952 |
) |
|
|
-87.5 |
% |
Revenues from all other customers |
|
|
31,747 |
|
|
|
33,073 |
|
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
-4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,886 |
|
|
$ |
66,164 |
|
|
$ |
(30,278 |
) |
|
|
-45.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publix as a percentage of total Energy and
Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The overall decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues during the six
month period 2009 compared to the six month period 2008 of $30.3 million was driven by a $29.0
million decrease in revenues from Publix together with a $1.3 million decrease in project-based
revenues from customers other than Publix.
The future level of our revenues will depend on the timing and degree of the recovery of the
domestic economy, the health of the credit markets and the return to pre-recession customer
spending for capital improvements and energy efficiency, as well as our ability to secure new
significant purchase orders. The level and timing of our future revenues will also be affected by
the amount and proportion of future recurring revenue projects, which sacrifices near-term revenue
for long-term annual recurring revenues in the future.
We expect that, in 2009 and beyond, revenues from Publix will continue to constitute a smaller
portion of our total revenues than in recent years because we have completed the majority of the
Publix distributed generation systems awarded to us, and our anticipated future projects from
Publix will generally be implemented over a longer time period, and will be smaller in absolute
amount. At present, management expects future Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues
will continue to be negatively impacted by current economic conditions including the lack of
availability of credit which
40
makes it difficult for certain of our customers to finance the purchase of our systems. In
addition, some of our customers have indicated they are deferring capital expenditures until
economic conditions show indications of improvement. As a result, management expects our Energy
and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues to remain depressed in 2009, and perhaps beyond,
depending on how quickly economic conditions stabilize and customers resume pre-recession spending
on capital improvements and energy efficiency.
Our Energy Services segment sales and service revenue decreased by $0.4 million, or 4.2%,
during the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008, due to a decrease in
both field and service related revenues and a decrease in equipment sales. The recent decline in
market conditions in the oil and gas sector negatively affected our Energy Services segment sales
and service revenue during the six month period 2009, and we expect low natural gas prices to
continue to negatively affect our Energy Services segment in the foreseeable future. In addition,
our Energy Services revenues are significantly affected by severe weather conditions, the extent of
which is unpredictable for any particular period. See Fluctuations below.
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margins
The following tables summarizes our segment costs of sales along with our segment gross
profits and gross profit margins for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Cost of Sales and Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
24,070 |
|
|
$ |
45,071 |
|
|
$ |
(21,001 |
) |
|
|
-46.6 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
6,636 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30,726 |
|
|
$ |
51,707 |
|
|
$ |
(20,981 |
) |
|
|
-40.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
$ |
11,816 |
|
|
$ |
21,093 |
|
|
$ |
(9,277 |
) |
|
|
-44.0 |
% |
Energy Services |
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
-15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,129 |
|
|
$ |
23,820 |
|
|
$ |
(9,691 |
) |
|
|
-40.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Gross Profit Margins: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 40.6% decrease in our consolidated cost of sales and services for the six month period
2009, compared to the six month period 2008, was attributable almost entirely to the costs avoided
associated with the 40.6% decrease in sales.
The 46.6% decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment cost of sales and services
in the six month period 2009 was driven by a 45.8% decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment sales and services revenue, together with factors leading to the improvement in our Energy
and
Smart Grid Solutions segment gross profit margin. Our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment
gross profit decreased $9.3 million, or 44.0%, in the six month period 2009, compared to the six
month period 2008. Additionally, our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment gross profit margin
increased by 1.0
41
percentage points in the six month period 2009 over the six month period 2008, to
32.9%. A total of $9.7 million of the gross profit decrease was driven by the decline in our
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segments revenue, partially offset by the positive effects of a
$0.4 million reduction in costs taken in response to anticipated negative economic conditions
affecting our sales. Specific cost reduction measures taken in 2009 include reductions in
construction personnel and other operational spending reductions.
The 0.3% increase in our Energy Services segment costs of sales and services in the six month
period 2009, notwithstanding the decline in its sales and service revenues, is the result of
factors that resulted in a decline in our Energy Services segment gross profit margin. Our Energy
Services segment gross profit margin decreased to 25.8% for the six month period 2009, compared to
29.1% during the six month period 2008. The decline in our Energy Services segment gross profit
margin was due to inefficiencies in the utilization of field personnel due to the lower revenues,
additional field service vehicle costs, and an increase in small tools and parts costs in the six
month period 2009 as compared to the six month period 2008. During the second quarter 2009, our
Southern Flow subsidiary took actions to reduce personnel costs in response to the decline in sales
and service revenues. The effects of these cost reductions were not fully realized during the six
month period 2009.
Operating Expenses
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating expenses for the periods indicated
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Consolidated Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
12,026 |
|
|
$ |
14,796 |
|
|
$ |
(2,770 |
) |
|
|
-18.7 |
% |
Selling, marketing and service |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
-44.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,017 |
|
|
$ |
19,058 |
|
|
$ |
(4,041 |
) |
|
|
-21.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six month period 2008, we expanded our investment in personnel driven by our high
levels of revenue, diversification investments in new businesses, and high levels of projects. In
anticipation of the current economic recession and in anticipation of a decline in revenues during
a significant portion of 2009, we took measures during the third quarter of 2008, and again in the
first and second quarters of 2009 to control our costs and reduce our operating expenses. These
measures included staff reductions and compensation measures such as reductions in certain bonus
plans and other employee incentives, and other sales and general and administrative spending
reductions. We expect these cost reduction measures to continue over the near-term in order to
address the negative effects of
the current economic downturn on our business. Over the long-term, however, we expect demand
for our business to expand allowing us to grow our business and to invest in future business
opportunities.
General and Administrative Expenses. The 18.7% decrease in our consolidated general and
administrative expenses in the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008, was
due to cost reductions in corporate expenses and staff reductions and other measures taken at our
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment to control and reduce our costs. The following table
provides further detail of our general and administrative expenses by segment (dollars in
thousands):
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment G&A Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
5,694 |
|
|
$ |
7,324 |
|
|
$ |
(1,630 |
) |
|
|
-22.3 |
% |
Vehicle lease and rental |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
-30.9 |
% |
Insurance |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
Rent-office and equipment |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
-19.6 |
% |
Professional fees and consulting |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
-57.2 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
-22.0 |
% |
Other |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
-26.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate Costs |
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
-10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,026 |
|
|
$ |
14,796 |
|
|
$ |
(2,770 |
) |
|
|
-18.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment personnel costs during the six
month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008, was due to staff reductions and other
actions taken to reduce costs in anticipation of a decrease in revenues at our PowerSecure
subsidiary. Other general and administrative expenses including vehicle lease and rental,
professional and consulting fees, travel and other expenses decreased as a result of our specific
cost reduction efforts. We expect our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions general and administrative
expenses to remain consistent from our six month period 2009 levels in the near-term as we continue
to manage the effects of the current economic recession on our business. Over the long-term, we
expect our expenses in these areas to increase at our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment as we
return to investing and supporting long-term growth.
The increase in our Energy Services segment general and administrative expense during the six
month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008 was due to investments in additional
personnel to support growth initiatives in the operations of our Southern Flow subsidiary. We
expect general and administrative expenses at our Energy Services segment to decline slightly from
current levels over the near-term as cost reduction actions taken in the second quarter 2009 take
effect. Over the long-term, we expect recent growth initiatives implemented in our Southern Flow
subsidiary will reverse its revenue decline and expand its markets and business opportunities and
will likely result in increased general and administrative expenses in the future.
The decrease in unallocated corporate costs during the six month period 2009 as compared to
the six month period 2008 is due to a decline in bonus expense and a reduction of stock
compensation expense.
Selling, Marketing and Service Expenses. The 44.0% decrease in selling, marketing and service
expenses in the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008, was due to
reductions in sales compensation expense driven by the current period decline in revenues,
advertising and promotion, travel, and a decrease in bad debt expense at our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment. The following table provides further detail of our segment selling, marketing
and service expenses (dollars in thousands):
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Segment Selling, Marketing and Service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
|
|
-17.4 |
% |
Commission |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
-62.0 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
-21.0 |
% |
Advertising and promotion |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
-48.9 |
% |
Bad debt expense (recovery) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
-96.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
183.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
3,214 |
|
|
$ |
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
-44.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the future, we expect our near-term Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment selling,
marketing and services expenses to stabilize at current levels in the near-term as we continue to
manage our costs and have lower commission expense due to lower revenues as a result of the current
economic recession, but increase in the long-term to reflect, drive, and support future growth.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. The 12.3% increase in depreciation and amortization
expenses in the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008, primarily reflects
an increase in depreciable assets acquired by our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment
throughout 2008, including capital expenditures related to Interactive Distributed
Generation® systems installed for sales under our recurring revenue model. Primarily as
a result of the above, our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment depreciation and amortization
expenses increased in the six month period 2009 by $71, or 8.2%, compared to the six month period
2008. Depreciation and amortization expense at our Energy Services segment also increased in the
six month period 2009 by $51, or 44.7%, compared to the six month period 2008 due to capital
investments late in 2008 and early 2009 to support growth initiatives.
Research and Development Expenses. The slight increase in research and development expenses
in the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008, reflects an increase in
normal product design and prototype costs for certain technologies incurred in each of the
respective periods in 2009 and 2008.
Other Income and Expenses
The following table sets forth our other income and expenses for the periods indicated, by
segment (dollars in thousands):
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-over-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Other Segment Income and
(Expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
|
-92.5 |
% |
Interest and finance charges |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
242.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
-35.1 |
% |
Equity income |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
-59.9 |
% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Corporate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
-68.7 |
% |
Interest and finance charges |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
-173.5 |
% |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
803 |
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
$ |
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Other Income. In total, interest and other income decreased $0.3 million during
the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008. This decrease was
attributable to a decline in our interest income resulting from both a decline in our
interest-bearing cash and cash equivalent balances as well as declining interest rates earned on
our cash and cash equivalent balances in the six month period 2009 compared to the six month period
2008. Our future interest income will depend on our interest-bearing cash and cash equivalent
balances, which will increase and decrease depending upon our profit, capital expenditures, and our
working capital needs, and future interest rates.
Interest and Finance Charges. In total, interest and finance charges increased $0.2 million
during the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008. The increase in our
unallocated corporate interest and finance charges reflects the unused revolving credit facility
fee and amortization of our finance charges incurred on our credit facility. The increase in our
Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment interest and finance charges reflects interest and
amortized finance charges on a $5.9 million capital lease obligation which we entered into in
December 2008 to finance certain recurring revenue projects. We expect our future interest and
finance charges to increase over time as a result of anticipated borrowings under our credit
facility to fund anticipated future recurring revenue projects at our Energy and Smart Grid
Solutions segment.
Management Fees. These fees, to a large extent, are based on a percentage of the revenues of
the WaterSecure operations. Due to the continued economic downturn and the significant reduction
in oil prices during early 2009 compared to 2008, the current market conditions in the oil and gas
sector have substantially weakened in 2009 compared to 2008 and have negatively affected the
revenues of the WaterSecure operations in 2009. As a direct result, our Energy Services segment
management fees
decreased in the six month period 2009 by 35.1% compared to the six month period 2008.
Equity Income. During the six month period 2009, our equity income decreased by $1.3 million,
or 59.9%, over the six month period 2008. The performance of the WaterSecure operations, and our related
45
equity income, was negatively affected by soft market conditions in the oil and gas sector
generally, and in the region in which it operates during the six month period 2009. Accordingly,
notwithstanding a small increase in our ownership interest that was acquired in July 2008, our
equity income decreased during the six month period 2009, as compared to the six month period 2008.
Income Taxes. The decrease in our the six month period 2009 income tax provision compared to
our the six month period 2008 income tax provision was due to our net loss in the six month period
2009 compared to our net income in the six month period 2008, and the resulting decreases in both
our federal alternative minimum tax and state income tax.
Fluctuations
Our revenues, expenses, margins, net income, cash flow and other operating results have
fluctuated significantly from quarter-to-quarter, period-to-period and year-to-year in the past and
are expected to continue to fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many
of which are outside of our control. These factors include, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
the effects of general economic conditions, including the current significant
downturn in the economy and financial crisis in the capital and credit markets, and the
strong likelihood of continuing future economic and market challenges negatively
impacting our business and our revenues and profit, including the negative impact these
conditions will have on the timing of and amounts of orders from our customers, and on
our access to capital to finance our business; |
|
|
|
|
the size, timing and terms of sales and orders, including large customer orders, as
well as the effects of the timing of project phases of completion, customers delaying,
deferring or canceling purchase orders or making smaller purchases than expected; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to grow our business and generate increased revenues from
customers other than Publix, our largest customer from 2006-2008, and our ability to
replace the revenues from Publix with new revenue streams; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to increase our revenues through long-term recurring revenue projects,
recognizing that increased revenues from recurring revenue projects requires
significant up-front capital expenditures and protracts revenue and profit recognition,
while increasing gross margins over the long-term; as well as our ability to sell,
complete, and recognize satisfactory levels of quarterly revenue and profits related to
our project-based sales, in order to maintain current profits, cash flow, and covenants
related to our debt facilities and successfully finance the recurring portion of our
business model; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain adequate supplies of key components and materials of suitable
quality for our products on a timely and cost-effective basis, including the impact of
potential supply line constraints, substandard parts, and fluctuations in the cost of
raw materials and commodity prices; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of our products, services and technologies, and the ability of our
systems to meet the performance standards they are designed and built to deliver to our
customers,
including but not limited to our recurring revenue projects for which we retain the
on-going risks associated with ownership of the systems; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to access significant capital resources on a timely basis in order to
fulfill large customer orders and finance capital required for recurring revenue
projects; |
46
|
|
|
our ability to implement our business plans and strategies and the timing of such
implementation; |
|
|
|
|
the pace of revenue and profit realization from our new businesses and the
development and growth of their markets; |
|
|
|
|
the timing, pricing and market acceptance of our new products and services; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies and those of our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
variations in the length of our sales cycle and product and service delivery and
construction process; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products and services having differing margins; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our operating expenses, including unforeseen or unanticipated expenses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our valuation allowance for our net deferred tax asset, and the resulting
impact on current tax expense, future tax expense, and balance sheet account balances; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of severe weather conditions, such as hurricanes, on the business
operations of our customers and the potential effect on our results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the life cycles of our products and services, and competitive alternatives in the
marketplace; |
|
|
|
|
budgeting cycles of utilities and other industrial, commercial, and institutional
customers, including impacts of the current downturn in the economy and capital markets
crisis on capital projects and other spending items; |
|
|
|
|
changes and uncertainties in the lead times required to obtain the necessary permits
and other governmental and regulatory approvals for projects; |
|
|
|
|
the development and maintenance of business relationships with strategic partners; |
|
|
|
|
economic conditions in the energy industry, especially in the natural gas and
electricity sectors including the effect of changes in energy prices and electricity
pricing and utility tarrifs; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the prices charged by our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of governmental regulations and regulatory changes in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of litigation, claims and other proceedings; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to make and obtain the expected benefits from acquisitions of technology
or businesses, and the costs related to such acquisitions. |
Because we have little or no control over most of these factors, our operating results are
difficult to predict. Any substantial adverse change in any of these factors could negatively
affect our business and results of operations.
Our revenues and other operating results are heavily dependent upon the size and timing of
customer orders, payments, and the timing of the completion of those projects. The timing of large
individual sales, and of project completion, is difficult for us to predict. Because our operating
expenses
are based on anticipated revenues and because a high percentage of these are relatively fixed,
a shortfall or delay in recognizing revenue could cause our operating results to vary significantly
from quarter-to-quarter and could result in significant operating losses or declines in profit
margins in any particular quarter. If our revenues fall below our expectations in any particular
quarter, we may not be able to
47
reduce our expenses rapidly in response to the shortfall, which
could result in us suffering significant operating losses or declines in profit margins in that
quarter.
As we develop new related lines of business, our revenues and costs will fluctuate as it takes
time for revenues to develop, but also requires start-up expenses. Another factor that could cause
material fluctuations in our quarterly results is the amount of recurring, as opposed to
project-based, sources of revenue for our distributed generation projects. To date, the majority
of our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment revenues have consisted of project-based distributed
generation revenues, which are recognized as the project is completed. However, we have focused
marketing efforts on developing more sales under our recurring revenue model, for which the costs
and capital is invested initially and the related revenue and profit is recognized over the life of
the contract, generally five to fifteen years, and this delays recognition of revenue and net
income as we implement an increased number of these recurring revenue projects, particularly in the
near-term.
Our Energy Services segment operating results will vary as a result of fluctuations in energy
prices. For example, in recent years, the high price of natural gas has led to an increase in
production activity by Southern Flows customers, resulting in higher revenues and net income by
Southern Flow. Recent declining prices of natural gas have led to a decline in production activity
by Southern Flows customers, resulting in reduced revenue growth and lower net income by Southern
Flow. Since energy prices tend to be cyclical, rather than stable, future cyclical changes in
energy prices are likely to affect our Energy Services segments future revenues and net income.
In addition, Southern Flows Gulf Coast customers are exposed to the risks of hurricanes and
tropical storms, which can cause fluctuations in Southern Flows results of operations, adversely
affecting results during hurricane season due to the effects on our customers and operations, and
then potentially enhancing results after the season due to rebuilding and repair efforts which
require our services. Results from our WaterSecure operations also fluctuate significantly with
changes in oil and natural gas prices and oil and natural gas production in Colorado.
Due to all of these factors and the other risks discussed in this report and in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, quarter-to-quarter, period-to-period or
year-to-year comparisons of our results of operations should not be relied on as an indication of
our future performance. Quarterly, period or annual comparisons of our operating results are not
necessarily meaningful or indicative of future performance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have historically financed our operations and growth primarily through a combination of
cash on hand, cash generated from operations, borrowings under credit facilities, leasing, and
proceeds from private and public sales of equity. On a going forward basis, we expect to require
capital primarily to finance our:
|
|
|
operations; |
|
|
|
|
inventory; |
|
|
|
|
accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
property and equipment expenditures, including capital expenditures related to
recurring |
48
|
|
|
additional equity investments in our WaterSecure operations; |
|
|
|
|
software purchases or development; |
|
|
|
|
debt service requirements; |
|
|
|
|
lease obligations; |
|
|
|
|
restructuring obligations; |
|
|
|
|
deferred compensation obligations; and |
|
|
|
|
business and technology acquisitions and other growth transactions. |
Working Capital
At June 30, 2009, we had working capital of $42.1 million, including $18.9 million in cash and
cash equivalents, compared to working capital of $42.6 million at December 31, 2008, which included
$24.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. Changes in the components of our working capital from
December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 and from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008 are explained in
greater detail below. At both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $50.0 million of
additional borrowing capacity from our undrawn credit facility. However, the availability of this
capacity under our credit facility includes restrictions on the use of proceeds, and is dependent
upon our ability to satisfy certain financial and operating covenants, as discussed below.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(2,840 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,019 |
) |
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
|
|
(15,162 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(5,455 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities consists primarily of net income (loss) adjusted for certain
non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expenses,
noncontrolling
interest, and equity income. Cash used in operating activities also include cash
distributions from our unconsolidated affiliate and the effect of changes in working capital and
other activities.
Cash used in operating activities of $2.8 million for the six month period 2009 included the
effects of the following:
|
|
|
our net loss of $0.5 million; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $1.1 million in depreciation and amortization; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million; |
49
|
|
|
non-cash noncontrolling interest in the income of EfficientLights of 0.4 million; |
|
|
|
|
cash distributions from our WaterSecure operations of $1.1 million partially offset
by non-cash equity income from those operations of $0.9 million; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.4 million in accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $3.0 million in inventories; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million in other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.5 million of accounts payable; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.5 million of accrued expenses; |
|
|
|
|
cash payments of $0.8 million on our restructuring obligations; and |
|
|
|
|
an increase in our deferred compensation obligation of $0.2 million. |
Cash used in operating activities of $6.0 million in the six month period 2008 included the
effects of the following:
|
|
|
our net income of $6.8 million; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash charges of $1.0 million in depreciation and amortization; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash stock-based compensations expense of $1.2 million; |
|
|
|
|
non-cash equity income from our WaterSecure operations of $2.2 million partially
offset by cash distributions from those operations of $0.5 million; |
|
|
|
|
a non-cash loss on disposal of miscellaneous assets of $0.2 million |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $3.6 million in accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.5 million in inventories; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million of other assets and liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
a net $1.6 million decrease in assets and liabilities of discontinued operations; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.6 million of accounts payable; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $10.9 million of accrued expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
cash payments of $3.1 million on our restructuring obligations. |
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $2.5 million and $15.2 million for the six month period
2009 and six month period 2008, respectively. Historically, our principal cash investments have
related to the purchase of equipment used in our production facilities, the acquisitions of certain
contract rights, the acquisition and installation of equipment related to our recurring revenue
sales, and the acquisition of additional equity interests in the WaterSecure operations. During
the six month period 2009, we used $1.2 million to purchase and install equipment at our recurring
revenue distributed generation sites, $0.8 million to acquire inventory and equipment of Design
Power International, Inc., and $0.5 million at our PowerSecure and Southern Flow subsidiaries
principally to acquire operational assets. During the six month period 2008, we used $3.3 million
to acquire the land and building constituting our principal
executive offices and the principal offices of our PowerSecure subsidiary, $10.4 million to
purchase and install equipment at our recurring revenue distributed generation sites, and $1.5
million at our PowerSecure and Southern Flow subsidiaries principally to acquire operational
assets.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $0.1 million in the six month period 2009 and cash
provided by financing activities was $2.7 million in the six month period 2008. During the six
month period 2009, we used $0.4 million to repay our capital lease obligations and we received 0.3
million from the exercise
50
of stock options and warrants. During the six month period 2008, we
received $2.6 million proceeds from a term loan used to finance the acquisition of the land and
building constituting our principal executive offices and the principal offices of our PowerSecure
subsidiary which was repaid later during 2008, $0.2 million proceeds from the exercise of stock
options, and we used $0.1 million for debt service.
Capital Spending
Our capital expenditures during the six month period 2009 were approximately $1.7 million, of
which we used $1.2 million to purchase and install equipment at our recurring revenue distributed
generation sites, and $0.5 million to purchase equipment and other capital items at our PowerSecure
and Southern Flow subsidiaries.
We anticipate making capital expenditures of approximately $5-10 million in 2009, although
economic and financial conditions could cause us to increase or decrease those capital
expenditures. The vast majority of our capital spending has to date been and will continue to be
used for investments in assets related to our recurring revenue projects as well as equipment to
support the growth of our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment.
Indebtedness
Line of Credit. We have an existing credit agreement with Citibank, N.A., as the
administrative agent, along with SunTrust Bank and BB&T, providing for a $50 million senior,
first-priority secured revolving and term credit facility. The credit facility, as amended, is a
$50,000 senior, first-priority secured revolving credit facility that is guaranteed by all of our
active subsidiaries and secured by all of our assets and the assets of our active subsidiaries.
We may, from time to time, request an increase in the aggregate revolving commitment amount by
up to $15,000 without the prior consent of the lenders provided that each lender has the unilateral
right to determine whether it agrees to increase its revolving commitment and that no lender is
required to increase its individual pro rata commitment amount without such lenders consent.
The credit facility, as a revolving credit facility, matures and terminates on November 13,
2011. However, we have the option prior to that maturity date to convert a portion of outstanding
principal balance, in an amount not to exceed the present value of estimated annual contract
revenues receivable under the initial term of contracts for recurring revenue projects executed
after December 31, 2007, into a non-revolving term loan for a two year period expiring November 12,
2013, making quarterly payments based upon a four year fully amortized basis.
We intend to use the proceeds available under the credit facility to finance our PowerSecure
subsidiarys recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures, working
capital, acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. Our outstanding borrowings under the credit
facility at any time, the proceeds of which were used for working capital purposes and not in
connection with recurring revenue projects, cannot exceed $15,000.
Outstanding balances under the credit facility bear interest, at our discretion, at either the
London Interbank Offered Rate for the corresponding deposits of U. S. Dollars plus an applicable
margin, which is on a sliding scale ranging from 175 basis points to 300 basis points based upon
the our leverage ratio, or at Citibanks alternate base rate plus an applicable margin, on a
sliding scale ranging from 0 basis
51
points to 125 basis points based upon our leverage ratio. Our
leverage ratio is the ratio of our funded indebtedness as of a given date to our consolidated
EBITDA as defined in the credit agreement for the four consecutive quarters ending on such date.
Citibanks alternate base rate is equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate as published by the
Federal Reserve of New York plus 0.50%, and Citibanks prime commercial lending rate.
The credit facility is not subject to any borrowing base computations or limitations, but does
contain certain financial covenants. Our maximum leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.25. Our minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio must be in excess of 1.50, where the fixed charge coverage ratio is
defined as the ratio of the aggregate of our trailing 12 month consolidated EBITDA plus our lease
or rent expense minus our taxes based on income and payable in cash, divided by the sum of our
consolidated interest charges plus our lease or rent expenses plus our scheduled principal payments
and dividends, computed over the previous period. Also, our minimum asset coverage must be in
excess of 1.25, where our asset coverage is defined as the summation of 80% of the book value of
accounts receivable plus 60% of the book value of inventory plus 50% of the book value of net fixed
assets, divided by total funded debt outstanding. In addition, we are required to maintain a
minimum consolidated tangible net worth, computed on a quarterly basis, equal to approximately
$42.8 million, plus 50% of our net income each year ending after December 31, 2007, with no
reduction for any net loss in any year, plus 100% of any equity we raise through the sale of equity
interests, less the amount of any non-cash charges or losses. Finally, our debt to worth ratio,
which is the ratio of our total consolidated indebtedness to our consolidated tangible net worth,
cannot exceed 1.5 to 1.0 at the end of any quarter. At June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with
these financial covenants.
Under the credit facility, our cumulative capital expenditures beginning in 2008 cannot exceed
the sum of $5,000 plus $1,250 per quarter, on a cumulative basis, plus an allowance for our
PowerSecure subsidiary recurring revenue projects generated after December 31, 2007. The credit
facility contains other representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants,
including restrictions with respect to liens, indebtedness, loans and investments, material changes
in our business, asset sales or leases or transfers of assets, restricted payments such as
distributions and dividends, mergers or consolidations and transactions with affiliates.
Upon the sale of any of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries other than in the
ordinary course of business or the public or private sale of any of our equity or debt or the
equity or debt of our subsidiaries other than equity issuances where the aggregate net equity
proceeds do not exceed $10,000, we are required to use the net proceeds thereof to repay any
indebtedness then outstanding under the credit facility, except for certain reinvestment
provisions.
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by guarantees and security agreements by
each of our active subsidiaries, including but not limited to our PowerSecure subsidiary, Southern
Flow and WaterSecure. The guarantees guaranty all of our obligations under the credit facility,
and the
security agreements grant to the lenders a first priority security interest in virtually all
of the assets of each of the parties to the credit agreement.
The credit agreement also contains customary events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, judgment defaults and certain ERISA-related events.
At June 30, 2009, there were no balances outstanding under the credit facility and we had
$50,000 available to borrow. However, the availability of this capital under our credit facility
includes
52
restrictions on the use of proceeds, and is dependent upon our ability to satisfy certain
financial and operating covenants, as described above.
Equipment Line. On July 22, 2008, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (Caterpillar)
renewed a line of credit to finance the purchase, from time to time, of Caterpillar generators to
be used in our PowerSecure subsidiarys projects, primarily those projects sold under the recurring
revenue model, pursuant to a letter by Caterpillar containing the terms of this credit line. The
line of credit was increased from its previous $7,500 level to $10,000. Under this line of credit,
our PowerSecure subsidiary may submit equipment purchases to Caterpillar for financing, and
Caterpillar may provide such financing in its discretion at an interest rate, for a period of time
between 12 and 60 months and upon such financing instruments, such as a promissory note or an
installment sales contract, as are set by Caterpillar on a project by project basis. The line of
credit expires on September 30, 2009 (subject to renewal, if requested by our PowerSecure
subsidiary and accepted by Caterpillar in its sole discretion), or at an earlier date upon notice
given by Caterpillar in its sole discretion. The letter setting forth the terms of the line of
credit confirms the intent of Caterpillar to finance equipment purchases by our PowerSecure
subsidiary, but is not an unconditional binding commitment to provide such financing. The line of
credit contains various customary provisions and is contingent upon the continued credit-worthiness
of our PowerSecure subsidiary in the sole discretion of Caterpillar. This line of credit from
Caterpillar is a permitted indebtedness under our credit facility with Citibank. At June 30, 2009,
there were no balances borrowed or outstanding under the equipment line of credit with Caterpillar.
Capital Lease Obligations. In December 2008, we entered into a sale and leaseback transaction
with SunTrust Equipment Finance and Leasing, an affiliate of SunTrust bank, resulting in the sale
of distributed generation equipment placed in service at customer locations and a lease of the
equipment from SunTrust. We received $5,912 from the sale of the equipment which we are repaying
under the terms of the lease with monthly payments of $85 of principal and interest over a period
of 84 months. At the expiration of the term of the lease, we have the option to purchase the
equipment for $1, assuming no default under the lease by us has occurred and is then continuing.
The lease is guaranteed by us under an equipment lease guaranty. The lease and the lease guaranty
constitute permitted indebtedness under our current credit agreement, under which an affiliate of
the lessor is one of the lenders.
We intend to use the proceeds of the lease financing to finance our PowerSecure subsidiarys
recurring revenue projects as well as to finance capital expenditures and working capital. We
account for the lease financing as a capital lease in our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The lease provides our PowerSecure subsidiary with limited rights, subject to the lessors
approval which will not be unreasonably withheld, to relocate and substitute equipment during its
term. The lease contains customary representations and warranties, covenants relating to the use
and maintenance of the equipment, indemnification, events of default, including payment defaults,
breach of
representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults, certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events, customary for leases of this nature. The lease also grants to the lessor
certain remedies upon a default, including the right to cancel the lease, to accelerate all rent
payments for the remainder of the term of the lease, to recover liquidated damages, or to repossess
and re-lease, sell or otherwise dispose of the equipment.
Under the lease guaranty, we have unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of our
PowerSecure subsidiary under the lease for the benefit of the lessor.
53
Our capital lease obligations at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $5.5 million and $5.9
million, respectively, and consist of our obligations under the equipment lease described above as
well as $5 of other miscellaneous lease obligations.
Restructuring Obligations. During 2007, we incurred restructuring charges for severance and
associated costs related to certain organizational changes focused on accelerating our growth, and
especially the growth of our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions segment. These restructuring charges
also include costs related to our decision to relocate our corporate headquarters from Denver,
Colorado to our PowerSecure subsidiarys facilities in Wake Forest, North Carolina. These
restructuring charges totaled $14.1 million pre-tax, $8.6 million after tax, or $0.88 per basic and
diluted share. These charges included severance of $7.7 million for our former Chief Executive
Officer, $5.2 million for our former Chief Financial Officer, $0.2 million for other individuals,
as well as $1.0 million of third-party professional fees and other expenses directly related to
implementing the organizational changes. We paid $4.0 million and $8.4 million on our
restructuring obligations during 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remaining balance of our payment
obligations at June 30, 2009 relating to these organizational changes, which balance consists
almost entirely of severance costs to our former Chief Executive Officer, will be paid in
installments of $0.5 million during the balance of 2009 and $0.4 million in 2010.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
We incur various contractual obligations and commercial commitments in our normal course of
business. We lease certain office space, operating facilities and equipment under long-term lease
agreements; to the extent we borrow under our credit facility, we are obligated to make future
payments under that facility; we have a deferred compensation obligation; and we also incurred
significant restructuring obligations in 2007. Also, in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48,
at June 30, 2009, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits and payment of related interest
and penalties totaling $0.9 million. We do not expect a significant payment related to these
obligations within the next year and we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate when cash
settlement with a taxing authority will occur. Accordingly, the information in the table below,
which is as of June 30, 2009, does not include the liability for unrecognized tax benefits (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring obligations |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease
obligations (2) |
|
|
6,605 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Deferred compensation (3) |
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
Series B preferred stock |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,641 |
|
|
$ |
3,670 |
|
|
$ |
3,006 |
|
|
$ |
4,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total repayments are based upon borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2009, not actual
or projected borrowings after such date. Repayments do not include interest that may
become due and payable in any future period. |
|
(2) |
|
Repayment amounts include interest on the capital lease obligation. |
|
(3) |
|
Total amount represents our expected obligation on the deferred compensation
arrangement and does not include the value of the restricted annuity contract, or interest
earnings thereon, that we purchased to fund our obligation. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the second quarter 2009, we did not engage in any material off-balance sheet activities
or have any relationships or arrangements with unconsolidated entities established for the purpose
of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any
commitment or intent to provide additional funding to any such entities.
Liquidity
Based upon our plans and assumptions as of the date of this report, we believe that our
capital resources, including our cash and cash equivalents, amounts available under our credit
facility, along with funds expected to be generated from our operations, will be sufficient to meet
our anticipated cash needs, including for working capital, capital spending and debt service
commitments, for at least the next 12 months. However, any projections of future cash needs and
cash flows are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. See Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements below in this item and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors below.
Although we believe that we have sufficient capital to fund our activities for at least the next 12
months, our future cash resources and capital requirements may vary materially from those now
planned. Our ability to meet our capital needs in the future will depend on many factors,
including the effects of the current economic and financial crisis, the timing of sales, the mix of
products, the amount of recurring revenue projects, our ability to meet our financial covenants
under our credit facility, unanticipated events over which we have not control increasing our
operating costs or reducing our revenues beyond our current expectations, and other factors listed
under Fluctuations above. For these reasons, we cannot provide any assurance that our actual
cash requirements will not be greater than we currently expect or that these sources of liquidity
will be available when needed.
We also continually evaluate opportunities to expand our current business, or to develop new,
products, services, technology and businesses that could increase our capital needs. In addition,
from time to time we consider the acquisition of, or the investment in, complementary businesses,
products, services and technology that might affect our liquidity requirements. We may seek to
raise any needed or desired additional capital from the proceeds of public or private equity or
debt offerings at the parent level or at the subsidiary level or both, from asset or business
sales, from traditional credit financings or from other financing sources. In addition, we
continually evaluate opportunities to improve our credit facilities, through increased credit
availability, lower debt costs or other more favorable terms. However, our ability to obtain
additional capital or replace or improve our credit facilities when needed or desired will depend
on many factors, including general economic and market conditions, our operating performance and
investor and lender sentiment, and thus cannot be assured. In addition, depending on how it is
structured, a financing could require the consent of our current lending group. Even if we are
able to raise additional capital, the terms of any financings could be adverse to the interests of
our
stockholders. For example, the terms of a debt financing could restrict our ability to
operate our business
55
or to expand our operations, while the terms of an equity financing, involving
the issuance of capital stock or of securities convertible into capital stock, could dilute the
percentage ownership interests of our stockholders, and the new capital stock or other new
securities could have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our current
stockholders. We cannot provide any assurance that sufficient additional funds will be available
to us when needed or desired or that, if available, such funds can be obtained on terms favorable
to us and our stockholders and acceptable to those parties who must consent to the financing. Our
inability to obtain sufficient additional capital on a timely basis on favorable terms when needed
or desired could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
revenue recognition and percentage of completion, fixed price contracts, product returns, warranty
obligations, bad debt, inventories, cancellations costs associated with long term commitments,
investments, intangible assets, assets subject to disposal, income taxes, restructuring, service
contracts, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making estimates and judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates, by their nature, are
based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual results could differ from those
estimates and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We have identified the accounting principles which we believe are most critical to
understanding our reported financial results by considering accounting policies that involve the
most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. These accounting policies described below
include:
|
|
|
revenue recognition; |
|
|
|
|
allowance for doubtful accounts; |
|
|
|
|
inventories; |
|
|
|
|
warranty reserve; |
|
|
|
|
impairment of long-lived assets; |
|
|
|
|
deferred tax valuation allowance; |
|
|
|
|
uncertain tax positions; |
|
|
|
|
costs of exit or disposal activities and similar nonrecurring charges; and |
56
|
|
|
stock-based compensation. |
These accounting policies are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Noncontrolling Interest In late 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160), which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (minority interest) and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. We adopted the provisions of FAS 160 on a prospective basis
beginning January 1, 2009. Accordingly, the noncontrolling shareholders interest in the equity of
EfficientLights at June 30, 2009 is included as a component of stockholders equity in our
consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009. The noncontrolling shareholders interest in the
income (losses) of EfficientLights is included in our consolidated statements of operations in
determining net income (loss) and earnings per share attributable to PowerSecure International
common stockholders. At December 31, 2008, the accumulated losses of the noncontrolling
shareholders interest in EfficientLights exceeded his basis. Under ARB No. 51, the noncontrolling
shareholders interest in the current period income of EfficientLights would have been offset
against the accumulated unrecognized noncontrolling shareholder losses. Accordingly, the effect of
adopting the provisions of FAS 160 on our statement of operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 was to increase the net loss attributable to PowerSecure International
shareholders by $331 and $365, respectively, for the effects of the unrecovered losses attributable
to the noncontrolling shareholder that were accumulated prior to December 31, 2008.
Accounting for Business Combinations In late 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 141 (FAS 141(R)), which significantly changes
the principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. FAS 141(R) also provides guidance for recognizing and
measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects
of the business combination. We adopted the provisions of FAS 141(R) effective January 1, 2009.
The adoption of FAS 141(R) had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or
financial statement disclosures.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161,
Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (FAS 161). FAS 161 amends FAS No. 133 by requiring expanded disclosures about, but does
not change the accounting for, derivative instruments and hedging activities, including increased
qualitative, quantitative, and credit-risk disclosures. We adopted the provisions of FAS 161
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of FAS 161 had no effect on our financial position,
results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Useful Life of Intangible Assets In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or extension assumptions
used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination
of intangible
57
asset useful lives. We adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 142-3 effective January 1,
2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 had no effect on our financial position or results of
operations or financial statement disclosures.
Participating Securities In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are
Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that unvested share-based
payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether
paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of earnings
per share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. We adopted
the provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1 effective January 1, 2009. All of our unvested restricted stock
awards contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends on a basis equal to our other common
stockholders. Accordingly, the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 increased our weighted average shares
outstanding at June 30, 2008 (for comparative purposes), and reduced our previously reported basic
and diluted earnings per share by $0.01 for each of the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2008.
Defensive Intangible Assets In November 2008 the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-7,
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets, or EITF 08-7. EITF 08-7 applies to defensive
intangible assets, which are acquired intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to
actively use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to them. As
these assets are separately identifiable, EITF 08-7 requires an acquiring entity to account for
defensive intangible assets as a separate unit of accounting, which should be amortized to expense
over the period the asset diminished in value. Defensive intangible assets must be recognized at
fair value in accordance with SFAS 141R and SFAS 157. We adopted the provisions of EITF 08-07
effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of EITF 08-07 had no effect on our financial position,
results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Fair Value Accounting Standards On April 9, 2009, the FASB adopted three new guidelines
under the so-called mark-to-market accounting rule, addressing concerns over the application of
fair value accounting standards given the current market conditions. We adopted all three guidance
standards effective June 30, 2009.
The first, FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly, allows companies to value assets at what they would sell for in an orderly sale, as
opposed to a forced or distressed sale. This includes certain hard-to-value troubled mortgages,
corporate loans, and consumer loans. The new rule establishes a process, by which companies look
at several factors and use their judgment to decide whether a formerly active market has become
inactive. If found to be inactive, a company must then determine if broker quotes, observed prices,
or a discounted cash flow analysis indicate distressed transactions. The adoption of FSB FAS 157-4
had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
The second, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (OTTI), changes the way companies are calculating OTTI for debt securities. Under FSP
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, recognition of OTTI is based on managements assertion it does not have
the intent to sell the debt instrument and it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the
debt instrument before recovery of its cost basis. As such, when adjusting the debt instrument to
fair value on the companys balance sheet, the credit component of an other-than-temporary
impairment of a debt security will be recorded through earnings and the remaining portion in other
comprehensive income.
The credit portion of the change in fair value of the debt security is measured on the basis
of an entitys
58
estimate of the decrease in expected cash flows. The adoption of FSB FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2 had no effect on our financial position, results of operations or financial statement
disclosures.
The third, FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, increases the frequency of disclosures that provide qualitative and quantitative
information about fair value estimates for financial instruments not currently measured on the
balance sheet at fair value. The FSP now requires disclosures typically only reported in annual
report to be included in the quarterly reports. The FSP does not require any new disclosures
related to fair value estimates. The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 had no effect on our
financial position, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets In December 2008, the FASB
issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets, which
requires additional disclosures for employers pension and other postretirement benefit plan
assets. As pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets were not included within the scope
of FAS No. 157, FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires employers to disclose information about fair value
measurements of plan assets similar to the disclosures required under SFAS No. 157, the investment
policies and strategies for the major categories of plan assets, and significant concentrations of
risk within plan assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will be effective for us as of December 31, 2009. We do
not expect the adoption of this standard will have any impact on our financial position, results of
operations or financial statement disclosures.
Subsequent Events DisclosureIn May 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
(FAS 165), which requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and whether that represents the date the financial statements were issued or were
available to be issued. We adopted the provisions of FAS 165 effective June 30, 2009. In
accordance with the provisions of FAS 165, we have evaluated events subsequent to June 30, 2009
through August 6, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued in this report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial AssetsIn June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (FAS 166). FAS 166 is a revision to FAS No.
140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities, and will require more information about transfers of financial assets and where
companies have continuing exposure to the risk related to transferred financial assets. It
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosure. This standard is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We will adopt FAS 166 on January 1,
2010. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 166 will have any impact on our financial position,
results of operations or financial statement disclosures.
Variable Interest EntitiesIn June 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167). FAS 167 is intended to improve financial reporting by
providing additional guidance to companies involved with variable interest entities and by
requiring additional disclosures about a companys involvement in variable interest entities.
Under FAS No. 167, determining whether a company is required to consolidate an entity will be based
on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. FAS No.
167 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We will adopt FAS
167 on January 1, 2010. We do not expect the adoption of FAS 167 will have any impact on our
financial position, results of operations or
financial statement disclosures.
59
Codification and Hierarchy of Accounting StandardsIn June 2009 the FASB issued FAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Standards (FAS 168). FAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. The Codification
will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. FAS 168 is effective in
the first interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. FAS 168 will have no effect
on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption other than current references to GAAP which
will be replaced with references to the applicable codification paragraphs.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
and made under the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. From time to time in the future, we may make
additional forward-looking statements in presentations, at conferences, in press releases, in other
reports and filings and otherwise. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than
statements of historical fact, including statements that refer to plans, intentions, objectives,
goals, strategies, hopes, beliefs, projections, prospects, expectations or other characterizations
of future events or performance, and assumptions underlying the foregoing. The words may,
could, should, would, will, project, intend, continue, believe, anticipate,
estimate, forecast, expect, plan, potential, opportunity and scheduled, variations of
such words, and other comparable terminology and similar expressions are often, but not always,
used to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but
are not limited to, statements about the following:
|
|
|
our prospects, including our future revenues, expenses, net income, margins,
profitability, cash flow, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and
our expectations about realizing our backlog; |
|
|
|
|
the effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations of
current and future economic, business, market and regulatory conditions, including the
current downturn in the economy and the adverse effects of the credit crisis on our
customers and their capital spending and ability to finance purchases of our products,
services, technologies and systems; |
|
|
|
|
our products and services, including their quality and performance, their benefits
to our customers and their ability to meet our customers requirements; |
|
|
|
|
our markets, including market position, market share, market demand; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully develop, operate, grow and diversify our operations and
businesses; |
|
|
|
|
our business plans, strategies, goals and objectives, and our ability to
successfully achieve them; |
|
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our capital resources, including our cash and cash equivalents,
funds generated from operations, availability of borrowings under our credit and
financing arrangements and other capital resources, to meet our future working capital,
capital expenditure, lease and debt service and business growth needs; |
|
|
|
|
industry trends and customer preferences; |
60
|
|
|
the nature and intensity of our competition, and our ability to successfully compete
in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
business acquisitions, combinations, sales, alliances, ventures and other similar
business transactions and relationships; and |
|
|
|
|
the effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations of
litigation and other claims and proceedings that arise from time to time. |
Any forward-looking statements we make are based on our current plans, intentions, objectives,
goals, strategies, hopes, beliefs, projections and expectations, as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to management. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
our forward-looking statements, any or all of which could turn out to be wrong. Forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance or events, but are subject to and qualified by
substantial risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are difficult to predict and are often
beyond our control. Forward-looking statements will be affected by assumptions and expectations we
might make that do not materialize or prove to be incorrect and by known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed, anticipated or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties
and other factors include, but are not limited to, those described in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as amended or supplemented in subsequently filed
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well as other risks,
uncertainties and factors discussed elsewhere in this Report, in documents that we include as
exhibits to or incorporate by reference in this Report, and in other reports and documents we from
time to time file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Any forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date of this
report, and any other forward-looking statements we make from time to time in the future speak only
as of the date they are made. We undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statement or to publicly disclose any update or revision for any reason, whether as
a result of changes in our expectations or the underlying assumptions, the receipt of new
information, the occurrence of future or unanticipated events, circumstances or conditions or
otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks arising from transactions we enter into in the ordinary
course of business. These market risks are primarily due to changes in interest rates and
commodity prices, which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk resulting from changes in interest rates
relates primarily to income from our investments in short-term interest-bearing marketable
securities, which is dependent upon the interest rate of the securities held, and to interest
expenses attributable to our credit facility, which is based on floating interest rates as
described in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of this report. Our lease with SunTrust is at a fixed interest rate and thus not
impacted by changes in interest rates.
At June 30, 2009, our cash and cash equivalent balance was approximately $18.9 million and our
credit facility had a zero balance. Our cash equivalents are invested in either bank deposits,
money market or U.S. government mutual funds, short-term time deposits, and government agency and
corporate obligations, or similar kinds of instruments, the income of which generally increases or
decreases in proportion to increases or decreases, respectively, in interest rates. We do not
believe that changes in
61
interest rates have had a material impact on us in the past or are likely
to have a material impact on us in
the foreseeable future. For example, a change of 1% (100 basis points) in the interest rate
on either our investments or any future reasonably likely borrowings would not have a material
impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow. While we believe we have
our cash and cash equivalents invested in relatively risk-free investments, the current capital
market crisis make it difficult to accurately assess the risk of each of our holdings. This risk
includes, but is not limited to, bank deposits in excess of FDIC insurance limits.
Commodity Price Risk. From time to time we are subject to market risk from fluctuating
commodity prices in certain raw materials we use. To date, in our Energy and Smart Grid Solutions
segment, we have managed this risk by using alternative raw materials acceptable to our customers
or we have been able to pass these cost increases to our customers. While we do not believe that
changes in commodity prices have had a material impact on us in the past, commodity price
fluctuations could have a material impact on us in the future, depending on the magnitude and
timing of such fluctuations. The impact of these fluctuations could result in an increase in our
operating costs and expenses and reduction in our gross margins and income due to increases in the
price and costs of engines, generators, copper, aluminum, electrical components, labor,
electricity, diesel fuel, gasoline, oil and natural gas. In our Energy Services segment, we have
on-going commodity price risk primarily related to the price of oil and natural gas. Movements in
prices of these commodities can materially impact our results in this segment.
Foreign Exchange Risk. Since substantially all of our revenues, expenses and capital spending
are transacted in U.S. dollars, we face minimal exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency
exchange rates.
We do not use derivative financial instruments to manage or hedge our exposure to interest
rate changes, foreign currency exchange risks or other market risks, or for trading or other
speculative purposes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2009, the end of the period covered
by this report. Based upon managements evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures
were designed at the reasonable assurance level and were effective at the reasonable assurance
level to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes
to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we
maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as
implementing new,
62
more efficient systems, consolidating activities and migrating processes. There
were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Limitations in Control Systems
Our controls and procedures were designed at the reasonable assurance level. However, because
of inherent limitations, any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired objectives
of the control system. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and management must apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits
of controls relative to their costs. Further, no evaluation of controls and procedures can provide
absolute assurance that all errors, control issues and instances of fraud will be prevented or
detected. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion
of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of
controls and procedures is also based in part on certain assumptions regarding the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions.
63
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in disputes and legal proceedings. There has been no
material change in our pending legal proceedings as described in Item 3. Legal Proceedings in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business and operating results are subject to many risks, uncertainties and other factors.
If any of these risks were to occur, our business, affairs, assets, financial condition, results
of operations, cash flows and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. These risks,
uncertainties and other factors include the information discussed elsewhere in this report as well
as the risk factors set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which have not materially changed as of the date of this
report.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on June 1, 2009, the following proposals were
submitted to and approved by the stockholders:
|
Proposal 1: |
|
To elect two directors, each to serve for a three-year term and until his
successor is duly elected and qualified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony D. Pell
|
|
|
13,621,731 |
|
|
|
646,249 |
|
Thomas J. Madden III
|
|
|
13,726,002 |
|
|
|
541,978 |
|
|
Proposal 2: |
|
To ratify the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
14,000,055
|
|
187,405
|
|
80,521 |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
(3.1)
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of PowerSecure International,
Inc., effective April 6, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 10, 2009.) |
|
|
|
(10.1)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2009, by and between
PowerSecure International, Inc. and each of its directors and |
64
|
|
|
|
|
executive officers (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 10, 2009.) |
|
|
|
(31.1)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith.) |
|
|
|
(31.2)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith.) |
|
|
|
(32.1)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Filed herewith.) |
|
|
|
(32.2)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Filed herewith.) |
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POWERSECURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
Date: August 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Sidney Hinton
|
|
|
|
Sidney Hinton |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Christopher T. Hutter
|
|
|
|
Christopher T. Hutter |
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |
|
|
66