UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )

 

Filed by the Registrant þ

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

 

PHH CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 

o  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 29, 2008

 

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2008 (the “Annual Meeting”) of PHH Corporation (the “Company”), which will be held at the Company’s offices located at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, on June 11, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., eastern daylight time. Please note that directions to the meeting location are provided on the last page of the Proxy Statement.

 

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to elect two Class III Directors to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2011, to approve the issuance of the Company’s common stock issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2012 and certain convertible note hedge and warrant transactions in connection therewith, to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 and to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe in more detail the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and provide other information concerning the Company of which you should be aware when you vote your shares. Also enclosed is a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Admission to the Annual Meeting will be by ticket only. If you are a registered stockholder planning to attend the meeting, please check the appropriate box on the proxy card and retain the bottom portion of the card as your admission ticket. If your shares are held through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, please follow the instructions under the “About the Annual Meeting of Stockholders” section of the Proxy Statement to obtain a ticket.

 

Your participation in the Company’s Annual Meeting is important, regardless of the number of shares you own. In order to ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting, whether you plan to attend or not, please vote in accordance with the enclosed instructions. As a stockholder of record, you can vote your shares by telephone, electronically via the Internet or by submitting the enclosed proxy card. If you vote using the proxy card, you must sign, date and mail the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to modify your vote, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person at the meeting.

 

The Board of Directors appreciates your time and attention in reviewing the accompanying Proxy Statement. Thank you for your continued interest in PHH Corporation. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

A. B. Krongard

Non-Executive Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

Terence W. Edwards

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

PHH CORPORATION

3000 Leadenhall Road

Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR 2008

 

 

To Be Held on June 11, 2008

 

To Our Stockholders:

 

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PHH Corporation (the “Company”) for 2008 will be held at the Company’s offices located at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, on June 11, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., eastern daylight time (the “Annual Meeting”), to consider and vote upon the following matters:

 

1. To elect two Class III Directors to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2010, and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

 

2. To approve the issuance of (a) up to 12,195,125 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of PHH Corporation (“Common Stock”) issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2012 (the “Notes”) previously issued, (b) up to 12,195,125 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to related convertible note hedge transactions that the Company entered into in connection with the issuance of the Notes, and (c) up to 12,195,125 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of related warrants to acquire shares of Common Stock that the Company issued in connection with the convertible note hedge transactions;

 

3. To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008; and

 

4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 14, 2008 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record as of the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

William F. Brown

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

April 29, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

PHH CORPORATION
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2008

 

 

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

Who is soliciting my vote?

 

The Board of Directors of PHH Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“we,” “our,” “us,” “PHH” or the “Company”), is soliciting your vote at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2008, and any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), to be held on the date at the time and place, and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice. This Proxy Statement and appendix, the accompanying notice of annual meeting, the enclosed proxy card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 29, 2008 (the “2007 Annual Report”) are being mailed to stockholders on or about May 2, 2008.

 

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

 

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will act on the matters outlined in the accompanying notice. The only matters scheduled to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting are (1) the Election of Directors (see page 8 of this Proxy Statement), (2) approval of the issuance of (a) up to 12,195,125 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of PHH Corporation (“Common Stock”) issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2012 (the “Notes”) previously issued, (b) up to 12,195,125 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to related convertible note hedge transactions that the Company entered into in connection with the issuance of the Notes, and (c) up to 12,195,125 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of related warrants to acquire shares of Common Stock that the Company issued in connection with the convertible note hedge transactions (see page 42 of this Proxy Statement) and (3) the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (see page 44 of this Proxy Statement).

 

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

 

Only stockholders of record as of March 14, 2008 (the “Record Date”), or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Registration and seating will begin at 9:00 a.m. Stockholders will be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.

 

Please note that if you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you must bring either a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker or nominee or a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date and check in at the registration desk at the Annual Meeting.

 

A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting beginning ten days prior to the Annual Meeting during ordinary business hours at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, the Company’s principal place of business, and ending on the date of the Annual Meeting.

Do I need a ticket to attend the Annual Meeting?

 

Yes. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to stockholders as of the Record Date, their authorized representatives and our guests. Admission will be by ticket only. For registered stockholders, the bottom portion of the proxy card enclosed with the Proxy Statement is the Annual Meeting ticket. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares in “street name,” or through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you should request tickets in writing from PHH Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, and include proof of ownership, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee holding your stock, confirming your beneficial ownership. Stockholders who do not obtain tickets in advance may obtain them on the Annual Meeting date at the registration desk upon verifying their stock ownership as of the Record Date. In accordance with our security procedures, all persons attending the Annual Meeting must present a picture identification along with their admission ticket or proof of beneficial ownership in order to gain admission. Admission to the Annual Meeting will be expedited if tickets are obtained in advance. Tickets may be issued to others at our discretion.

 

How many votes do I have?

 

You will have one vote for every share of our Common Stock you owned on the Record Date.

 

How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?

 

54,136,732 votes may be cast at the Annual Meeting, representing one vote for each share of our Common Stock that was outstanding on the Record Date. There is no cumulative voting, and the holders of our Common Stock vote together as a single class.

 

How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

 

A majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present, in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders of record who are present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and who abstain from voting, including brokers holding customers’ shares of record who cause abstentions to be recorded at the Annual Meeting, will be included in the number of stockholders present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.

 

How many votes are required to elect Directors and adopt any other proposals?

 

Directors are elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of our Common Stock cast at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote in the election of Directors. Under applicable Maryland law, in determining whether such nominees have received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

 

Approval of the issuance of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes, Note Hedges and Warrant Transactions requires an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on the proposal. Under applicable Maryland law, abstentions and broker non-votes will count for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting, but will not be counted as votes cast or shares voting on the proposal and will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

 

Approval of the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm and generally all other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our Common Stock cast, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Under applicable Maryland law, in determining whether such proposals have received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

What is a broker non-vote?

 

Generally, a broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a nominee for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because (i) the nominee has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (ii) the nominee lacks discretionary voting power to vote such shares. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the “NYSE”), a nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to “non-routine” matters.

 

How do I vote?

 

You can vote in person or by valid proxy received by telephone, via the Internet or by mail. If voting by mail, you must:

 

 

Alternatively, in lieu of returning signed proxy cards, our stockholders of record can vote their shares by telephone or via the Internet. If you are a registered stockholder (that is, if you hold your stock in certificate form), you may vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet by following the instructions included with your proxy card. The deadline for voting by telephone or electronically through the Internet is 11:59 p.m., eastern daylight time, on June 10, 2008. If your shares are held in “street name” such as in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, please check your proxy card or contact your broker or nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote by telephone or electronically through the Internet.

 

How do participants in our employee savings plans vote?

 

For participants in the PHH Corporation Employee Savings Plan and the PHH Home Loans, LLC Employee Savings Plan (the “Savings Plans”) with shares of our Common Stock credited to their accounts, voting instructions for the trustees of the Savings Plans are also being solicited through this Proxy Statement. In accordance with the provisions of the Savings Plans, the respective trustees will vote shares of our Common Stock in accordance with instructions received from the participants to whose accounts such shares are credited. To the extent such instructions are not received prior to 11:59 a.m., eastern daylight time, on June 9, 2008, the trustees of the Savings Plans will vote the shares with respect to which it has not received instructions proportionately in accordance with the shares for which it has received instructions. Instructions given with respect to shares in accounts of the Savings Plans may be changed or revoked only in writing, and no such instructions may be revoked after 11:59 a.m., eastern daylight time, on June 9, 2008. Participants in the Savings Plans are not entitled to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If a participant in the Savings Plans has shares of our Common Stock credited to his or her account and also owns other shares of our Common Stock, he or she should receive a voting instruction card for shares credited to his or her account in the Savings Plans and any other shares that he or she owns. All such proxy and voting instruction cards should be completed, signed and returned to the transfer agent to register voting instructions for all shares owned by him or her or held for his or her benefit in the Savings Plans.

 

Can I change my vote?

 

Yes. A proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the voting at the Annual Meeting by submitting a later dated proxy (including a proxy by telephone or electronically through the Internet), by giving timely written notice of such revocation to our Corporate Secretary or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. However, if you hold shares in “street name,” you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you bring with you a legal proxy from the stockholder of record.

What if I do not vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy card?

 

Shares of our Common Stock represented by proxies received by us (whether through the return of the enclosed proxy card, by telephone or through the Internet), where the stockholder has specified his or her choice with respect to the proposals described in this Proxy Statement, including the election of Directors, ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm and approval of the issuance of the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes, Note Hedges and Warrant Transactions, will be voted in accordance with the specification(s) so made.

 

If your proxy is properly executed but does not contain voting instructions, or if you vote by telephone or via the Internet without indicating how you want to vote, your shares will be voted:

 

 

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

 

The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any matter before the Annual Meeting other than those set forth above, and the Board is not aware of any matters that anyone else proposes to present for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted substitutes acting at the Annual Meeting, will be authorized to vote or otherwise act thereon in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

 

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

 

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Our Directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies on behalf of the Company in person or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means. We have engaged Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to assist us in the distribution and solicitation of proxies for a fee of $9,000 plus expenses. In accordance with the regulations of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we also reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses incurred in sending proxies and proxy materials to beneficial owners of our Common Stock as of the Record Date.

 

Has the Company adopted the new e-proxy rules for the delivery of the proxy materials?

 

No. We are delivering the proxy materials, including the 2007 Annual Report, the Proxy Statement and other materials, to all stockholders as we have in prior years. We will evaluate whether to adopt the notice and access option under the e-proxy rules for delivery of proxy materials for future annual meetings.

 

How can I access the Company’s proxy materials and 2007 Annual Report electronically?

 

Copies of the 2007 Annual Report, the Proxy Statement and other materials filed by the Company with the SEC are available without charge to stockholders on our corporate website at www.phh.com or upon written request to PHH Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054. You can elect to receive future annual reports and proxy statements electronically by marking the appropriate box on your proxy card or by following the instructions provided if you vote via the Internet or by telephone.

What financial information is accompanying the Proxy Statement?

 

Accompanying the Proxy Statement is the 2007 Annual Report. The 2007 Annual Report includes our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Based on the inherent uncertainties of our business, the historical financial information included in the 2007 Annual Report and selected financial data may not be indicative of what our results of operations and financial position will be in the future.

 

 

 

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Board of Directors currently consists of seven members. Our charter divides our Board of Directors into three classes of Directors having staggered terms, with one class being elected each year for a new three-year term and until their successors are elected and qualified. The term for Class I Directors expires at the annual meeting of our stockholders for 2009, the term for Class II Directors expires at the annual meeting of our stockholders for 2010 and the term for Class III Directors expires at the annual meeting of our stockholders for 2008. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the members of our Board of Directors:

 

 

A.B. Krongard was elected Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors effective upon our spin-off from Cendant Corporation (our former parent company, now known as Avis Budget Group, Inc., referred to herein as “Cendant”) in the first quarter of 2005 (the “Spin-Off”). Since December 2004, Mr. Krongard has been pursuing personal interests. From March 2001 until December 2004, Mr. Krongard served as Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. From February 1998 until March 2001, Mr. Krongard served as Counselor to the Director of Central Intelligence. Mr. Krongard previously worked in various capacities at Alex. Brown, Incorporated (“Alex. Brown”). In 1991, Mr. Krongard was elected as Chief Executive Officer of Alex. Brown and assumed the additional duties of Chairman of the Board of Alex. Brown in 1994. Upon the merger of Alex. Brown with Bankers Trust Corporation (“Bankers Trust”) in September 1997, Mr. Krongard became Vice Chairman of the Board of Bankers Trust and served in such capacity until joining the Central Intelligence Agency. Since July 2005, Mr. Krongard has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Under Armour, Inc. and is the Chairman of its Audit Committee. Under Armour, Inc. files reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

 

James W. Brinkley was elected as a Director effective upon the Spin-Off. In December 2005, Mr. Brinkley became Vice Chairman of Smith Barney’s Global Private Client Group following Citigroup Inc.’s acquisition of Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated (“LMWW”). Mr. Brinkley served as a Director of Legg Mason, Inc., a holding company that, through its subsidiaries, provides financial services to individuals, institutions, corporations, governments and government agencies since its formation in 1981. Mr. Brinkley has served as a Senior Executive Vice President of Legg Mason, Inc. since December 1983. Mr. Brinkley became Chairman of LMWW, Legg Mason Inc.’s principal brokerage subsidiary, in February 2004. Mr. Brinkley previously served as LMWW’s Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from July 2003 through February 2004, as its President from 1985 until July 2003 and as its Chief Operating Officer from February 1998 until July 2003.

 

Terence W. Edwards serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since February 2005 and President and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Mortgage, a position he has held since August 2005. Prior to the Spin-Off, Mr. Edwards served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cendant Mortgage Corporation (“Cendant Mortgage,” now known as PHH Mortgage) since February 1996, and as such, was responsible for overseeing its entire mortgage banking operations. From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Edwards served as Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasurer and was responsible for investor, banking and rating agency relations, financing resources, cash management, pension investment management and internal financial structure. Mr. Edwards joined

us in 1980 as a treasury operations analyst and has held positions of increasing responsibility, including Director, Mortgage Finance and Senior Vice President, Secondary Marketing.

 

George J. Kilroy serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Arval, a position he has held since March 2001. Mr. Kilroy is responsible for the management of PHH Arval. From May 1997 to March 2001, Mr. Kilroy served as Senior Vice President, Business Development and was responsible for new client sales, client relations and marketing for PHH Arval’s United States operations. Mr. Kilroy joined PHH Arval in 1976 as an Account Executive in the Truck and Equipment Division and has held positions of increasing responsibility, including head of Diversified Services and Financial Services.

 

Ann D. Logan was elected as a Director effective upon the Spin-Off. Since July 2000, Ms. Logan has worked with various non-profit organizations. Ms. Logan was an Executive Vice President at the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) from January 1993 to July 2000. Ms. Logan ran the single-family mortgage business at Fannie Mae from 1998 to 2000 and was the Chief Credit Officer from 1993 to 1998. From 1989 to 1993, Ms. Logan was a Senior Vice President in charge of Fannie Mae’s Northeast Regional Office in Philadelphia. Prior to joining Fannie Mae, Ms. Logan was Assistant Vice President at Standard & Poor’s Corporation in New York. From 1976 to 1980, Ms. Logan worked for the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and served as the Committee Staff Director in 1980.

 

Jonathan D. Mariner was elected as a Director effective upon the Spin-Off. Mr. Mariner has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Major League Baseball since January 2004. From March 2002 to January 2004, Mr. Mariner served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Major League Baseball. From December 2000 to March 2002, Mr. Mariner served as the Chief Operating Officer of Charter Schools U.S.A., a charter school development and management company. Mr. Mariner was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Florida Marlins Baseball Club from February 1992 to December 2000.

 

Francis J. Van Kirk was elected as a Director effective July 1, 2005. Since November 2005, Mr. Van Kirk has been a partner with Heidrick & Struggles, an international executive search and leadership consulting services company. Prior to joining Heidrick & Struggles, Mr. Van Kirk served as the Managing Partner of the Philadelphia office of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PricewaterhouseCoopers”) from 1996 through June 2005. In this role, Mr. Van Kirk oversaw the integration and coordination of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ lines of service and industry groups to ensure seamless service to its clients. Mr. Van Kirk began his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers in 1971 as a Staff Auditor and was employed in positions of increasing responsibility during his 35-year career with that firm.

 

Independence of the Board of Directors

 

Under the rules of the NYSE, our Board of Directors is required to affirmatively determine which Directors are independent and to disclose such determination in the 2007 Annual Report and in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of stockholders going forward. On February 27, 2008 and March 18, 2008, our Board of Directors reviewed each Director’s relationships with us in conjunction with our previously adopted Independence Standards for Directors (the “Independence Standards”) and Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual (the “NYSE Listing Standards”). A copy of our Independence Standards is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A and is available on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” A copy of our Independence Standards is also available to stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1-856-917-1PHH). At the meeting, the Board affirmatively determined that all non-employee Directors — Messrs. Brinkley, Krongard, Mariner and Van Kirk and Ms. Logan — meet the categorical standards under the Independence Standards and are independent Directors under the NYSE Listing Standards.

 

In the course of its determination of the independence of each non-management Director, the Board considered the following transactions, relationships and arrangements as required by our Independence Standards:

 

 

 

See also “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below for more information. Our Board also determined that Messrs. Edwards and Kilroy, who serve as executive officers, are not independent Directors. Accordingly, more than two-thirds of the members of our Board of Directors are independent as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

 

Non-Executive Chairman

 

Mr. Krongard serves as our Non-Executive Chairman. The Non-Executive Chairman is not a corporate officer and leads all meetings of our Board of Directors at which he is present. The Non-Executive Chairman serves on appropriate committees as requested by the Board of Directors, sets meeting schedules and agendas and manages information flow to the Board of Directors to assure appropriate understanding of, and discussion regarding matters of interest or concern to the Board of Directors. The Non-Executive Chairman also has such additional powers and performs such additional duties consistent with organizing and leading the actions of the Board of Directors as the Board of Directors may from time-to-time prescribe.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ELECTION OF CLASS III DIRECTORS

 

The Board of Directors has nominated Messrs. James W. Brinkley and Jonathan D. Mariner to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve as Class III Directors for a three-year term ending at the annual meeting of stockholders for 2011 and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Both nominees are currently incumbent Directors of the Company. The terms of the remaining Class I and Class II Directors expire at the annual meeting of stockholders for 2009 and 2010, respectively.

 

Both nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. If, prior to the Annual Meeting, either nominee should become unavailable to serve, the shares of our Common Stock represented by a properly executed and returned proxy (whether through the return of the enclosed proxy card, by telephone or electronically through the Internet) will be voted for such additional person as shall be designated by the Board of Directors, unless the Board of Directors determines to reduce the number of Directors in accordance with our amended and restated articles of incorporation and by-laws.

Directors shall be elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of our Common Stock cast at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote in the election of Directors; provided that a quorum is present. Pursuant to applicable Maryland law, in determining whether such nominees have received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH NOMINEE AS A CLASS III DIRECTOR. UNLESS MARKED TO THE CONTRARY, PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE TWO NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

 

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

 

The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and Finance and Risk Management Committee consisting of Directors who have been affirmatively determined to be “independent” as defined in the NYSE Listing Standards. Each of these Committees operates pursuant to a written charter approved by the Board of Directors and available on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” A copy of each committee charter is also available to stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1-856-917-1PHH). In addition, the Board of Directors has a standing Executive Committee which may take certain actions on behalf of the Board of Directors when the Board is not in session.

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in the oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our independent registered public accountants’ qualifications and independence, the performance of our independent registered public accountants and our internal audit function and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Committee is a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Committee also oversees our corporate accounting and reporting practices by:

 

 

The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Van Kirk (Chair) and Mariner and Ms. Logan. Each member of the Audit Committee is required to have the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements. The Audit Committee is also required to have at least one member that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC. Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Mariner and Van Kirk qualify as audit committee financial experts and are non-employee, independent Directors. During 2007, the Audit Committee met 13 times and acted by unanimous written consent on one occasion.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee determines and approves all elements of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and senior management; reviews and approves our compensation strategy, including the elements of total compensation for senior management; reviews and approves the annual bonus and long-term bonus incentive plans and reviews and grants equity awards for our employees. The Compensation Committee also assists us in developing compensation and benefit strategies to attract, develop and retain qualified employees. See “Executive Compensation” for additional information regarding the process for the determination and consideration of

executive compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Messrs. Brinkley (Chair) and Krongard and Ms. Logan. During 2007, the Compensation Committee met eight times and acted by unanimous written consent on one occasion.

 

Corporate Governance Committee

 

The Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities with respect to its governance function include considering matters of corporate governance and reviewing and revising our Board of Directors’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors and our Code of Conduct for Employees and Officers. The Corporate Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees for our Board of Directors for each annual meeting (see “Nomination Process and Qualifications for Director Nominees” below); evaluates the composition, organization and governance of our Board of Directors and its committees and develops and recommends corporate governance principles and policies applicable to us. The Committee is comprised of Messrs. Krongard (Chair), Brinkley and Mariner. During 2007, the Corporate Governance Committee met two times.

 

Finance and Risk Management Committee

 

The Finance and Risk Management Committee was formed on February 27, 2008 to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the assessment of our overall capital structure and its impact on the generation of appropriate risk adjusted returns as well as the existence, operation and effectiveness of our risk management programs, policies and practices. The Finance and Risk Management Committee is comprised of Ms. Logan (Chair) and Messrs. Krongard and Van Kirk.

 

Executive Committee

 

The Executive Committee may exercise all of the powers of our Board of Directors when the Board is not in session, including the power to authorize the issuance of stock, except that the Executive Committee has no power to alter, amend or repeal our by-laws or any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors, declare any dividend or make any other distribution to our stockholders, appoint any member of the Executive Committee or take any other action which legally may be taken only by the full Board of Directors. The Executive Committee is comprised of Messrs. Krongard (Chairman), Edwards and Kilroy. During 2007, the Executive Committee did not meet.

 

BOARD MEETINGS

 

During 2007, our Board of Directors held twelve meetings. In addition, the standing Committees of the Board of Directors held an aggregate of 35 meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on two occasions in that period. In 2007, all incumbent Directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board of Directors on which they served. All Directors are expected to attend each regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting as well as each annual meeting of our stockholders (subject to certain limited exceptions). All of our Directors, except for Mr. Mariner, who was unable to attend due to a previously scheduled business trip out of the country, attended the annual meeting of stockholders for 2007 held on March 18, 2008.

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the compensation of our non-employee Directors. Members of our Board of Directors who are also our officers or employees do not receive compensation for serving as a Director (other than travel-related expenses for Board meetings held outside of our corporate offices). The following table sets forth the non-employee Director retainer and stipend schedule:

 

 

 

 

The non-employee Director retainers and stipends set forth in the table above are paid in arrears at the end of each quarter (the “Fee Payment Date”), half in cash and half in restricted stock units (the “Director RSUs”) of our Common Stock, which are issued under our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan and are required to be deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. The Director RSUs may not be sold or otherwise transferred for value prior to the Director’s termination of service on the Board. These Director RSUs are immediately vested and are paid in shares of our Common Stock one year after the Director is no longer a member of the Board of Directors. A non-employee Director may also elect to receive all or a portion of the cash retainer, stipends or any other compensation for service as a non-employee Director in the form of additional Director RSUs. These Director RSUs are also immediately vested and are paid in shares of our Common Stock 200 days after the Director is no longer a member of the Board of Directors. We do not maintain a pension plan for non-employee Directors, and they did not receive any other compensation for 2007.

 

Director Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to or earned by each non-employee Director for 2007:

 

 

 

 

Non-Employee Director		3/31/2007				6/30/2007				9/30/2007				12/31/2007
James W. Brinkley		$	17,719			$	17,727			$	17,713			$	17,728
A.B. Krongard			23,585				23,595				23,599				23,602
Ann D. Logan			17,719				17,727				17,713				17,728
Jonathan D. Mariner			17,322				17,353				17,345				17,357
Francis J. Van Kirk			17,444				17,478				17,476				17,481

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

 

Executive sessions of non-management Directors without management present are held regularly by the Board of Directors and its Committees to discuss the criteria upon which the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives is based, the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives against such criteria, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives and any other relevant matters. In 2007, the non-management Directors met in executive session without management one time. Our Board of Directors has designated Mr. Krongard, our Non-Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, as the presiding Director of executive sessions of the non-management Directors of the Board of Directors.

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist the Board of Directors in monitoring the effectiveness of decision-making, both at the Board of Directors and management levels and to enhance long-term stockholder value. The Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the following:

 

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is

available to stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1-856-917-1PHH).

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors

 

We are committed to conducting business in accordance with the highest standards of business ethics and complying with applicable laws, rules and regulations. In furtherance of this commitment, our Board of Directors promotes ethical behavior and has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors (the “Directors Code”) that is applicable to all of our Directors. The Directors Code provides, among other things:

 

 

The Directors Code is available on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” We will post any amendments to the Directors Code, or waivers of the provisions thereof, to our corporate website under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” A copy of the Directors Code is also available to stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1- 856-917-1PHH).

 

Code of Conduct for Employees and Officers

 

Our Board of Directors has also adopted a Code of Conduct for Employees and Officers (the “Employees and Officers Code”) that is applicable to all of our officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. The Employees and Officers Code provides, among other things:

 

 

The Employees and Officers Code is available on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” We will post any amendments to the Employees and Officers Code, or waivers of the provisions thereof for any of our executive officers, to our corporate website under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” A copy of the Employees and Officers Code is also available to stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1-856-917-1PHH).

Nomination Process and Qualifications for Director Nominees

 

The Board of Directors has established certain procedures and criteria for the selection of nominees for election to our Board of Directors. Pursuant to its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee is required to identify individuals qualified to become members of the Board, which shall be consistent with the Board’s criteria for selecting new Directors. The committee considers criteria such as diversity, age, skills and experience so as to enhance the Board of Directors’ ability to manage and direct our affairs and business, including, when applicable, to enhance the ability of Corporate Governance Committees of the Board to fulfill their duties and/or to satisfy any independence requirements imposed by law, regulation or NYSE requirement. The Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for conducting a review of the credentials of individuals it wishes to recommend to the Board of Directors as a Director nominee, recommending Director nominees to the Board of Directors for submission for a shareholder vote at either an annual meeting of stockholders or at any special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing Directors, reviewing the suitability for continued service as a Director of each Board member when his or her term expires and when he or she has a significant change in status, including but not limited to an employment change, and recommending whether such a Director should be re-nominated to the Board or continue as a Director.

 

Our by-laws provide the procedure for stockholders to make Director nominations either at any annual meeting of stockholders or at any special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing Directors. A stockholder who is both a stockholder of record on the date of notice as provided for in our by-laws and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting and gives timely notice can nominate persons for election to our Board of Directors either for an annual meeting of stockholders or at any special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing Directors. The notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1-856-917-1PHH):

 

 

The stockholder’s notice to our Corporate Secretary must be in writing and set forth (i) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a Director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of Directors pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and (ii) as to the stockholder giving the notice:

 

 

 

In addition, the notice must be accompanied by a written consent of each proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a Director if elected.

 

Communication with Non-Management Directors

 

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, all stockholder and interested party communications to any Director, the non-management Directors as a group or the Board of Directors shall be forwarded to the attention of the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054. The Corporate Secretary shall review all such stockholder and interested party communications and discard those which (i) are not related to our business or governance of our company, (ii) are commercial solicitations which are not relevant to the Board’s responsibilities and duties, (iii) pose a threat to health or safety or (iv) the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee has otherwise instructed the Corporate Secretary not to forward. The Corporate Secretary will then forward all relevant stockholder and interested party communications to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee for review and dissemination.

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Our executive officers are set forth in the table below. All executive officers are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

 

 

Clair M. Raubenstine serves as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since February 2006. From October 1998 through June 2002, Mr. Raubenstine served as a national independence consulting partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers. He also previously served as an Accounting, Auditing and SEC consulting partner and as an assurance and business advisory services partner to various public and private companies. Mr. Raubenstine’s career at PricewaterhouseCoopers spanned 39 years until his retirement in June 2002. From July 2002 through February 2006, Mr. Raubenstine provided accounting and financial advisory services to various charitable and educational organizations.

 

Mark R. Danahy serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PHH Mortgage, a position he has held since April 2001. Mr. Danahy is responsible for directing the mortgage accounting and financial planning teams, which include financial reporting, asset valuation and capital markets accounting, planning and forecasting. Mr. Danahy joined Cendant Mortgage in December 2000 as Controller. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Danahy served as Senior Vice President, Capital Market Operations for GE Capital Market Services, Inc.

 

William F. Brown serves as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, a position he has held since February 2005 and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of PHH Mortgage. Mr. Brown has served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Cendant Mortgage, now PHH Mortgage, since June 1999 and oversees its legal, contract, licensing and regulatory compliance functions. From June 1997 to

June 1999, Mr. Brown served as Vice President and General Counsel of Cendant Mortgage. From January 1995 to June 1997, Mr. Brown served as Counsel in the PHH Corporate Legal Department.

 

Mark E. Johnson serves as our Vice President and Treasurer, a position he has held since February 2005. Prior to the Spin-Off, Mr. Johnson served as Vice President, Secondary Marketing of Cendant Mortgage, now PHH Mortgage, since May 2003 and was responsible for various funding initiatives and financial management of certain subsidiary operations. From May 1997 to May 2003, Mr. Johnson served as Assistant Treasurer of Cendant, where he had a range of responsibilities including banking and rating agency relations and management of unsecured funding and securitization.

 

Michael D. Orner serves as our Vice President and Controller, a position he has held since March 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr. Orner was employed by Millennium Chemicals, Inc. as Corporate Controller from January 2003 through March 2005 and Director of Accounting and Financial Reporting from December 1999 through December 2002. Prior to joining Millennium Chemicals, Inc., Mr. Orner served as a Senior Manager, Audit and Business Advisory Services for PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he was employed from September 1989 through November 1999.

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our outstanding Common Stock, as of April 28, 2008, by those persons who are known to us to be beneficial owners of 5% or more of our Common Stock, by each of our Directors, by each of our Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 29) and by our Directors and Executive Officers as a group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and Directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, Directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms we have received and written representations from such reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required, we believe that all of our executive officers, Directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during 2007.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Introduction

 

On March 15, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Jade Merger Sub, Inc. (“Jade”) to be acquired (the “Merger”). In conjunction with the Merger, GE entered into an agreement to sell our mortgage operations to Pearl Acquisition 2 L.L.C., an affiliate of The Blackstone Group (“Blackstone”), a global investment and advisory firm. During 2007, compensation decisions did not include a detailed evaluation of the compensation structure due to the fact that the Merger was pending and the Merger Agreement contained customary restrictions on changing the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee focused on severance and retention matters and did not undertake certain of its annual compensation actions, such as granting equity awards, in anticipation of the closing of the Merger on or before December 31, 2007. The Merger ultimately was terminated on January 1, 2008 pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.

 

Compensation Committee Oversight of Executive Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised of three independent, non-executive Directors — Messrs. Brinkley (Chair) and Krongard and Ms. Logan — and is responsible for overseeing our executive compensation policies, including evaluating and approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as listed in the “— Summary Compensation Table” below. The Board of Directors has adopted a Compensation Committee Charter which sets forth the purpose, composition, authority and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews and determines the base salary, annual and long-term incentive awards, equity awards and other compensation for each Named Executive Officer, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, and evaluates our compensation policies. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to engage and retain executive compensation consultants to assist with such evaluations.

 

Executive Compensation Objectives

 

The primary objective of our executive compensation policies is to attract, retain and motivate qualified executive officers to manage our business in order to maximize stockholder value. Our executive compensation policies are intended to facilitate the achievement of our short-term and long-term business strategies through aligning compensation with performance by:

 

 

The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation for our Named Executive Officers and stock equity awards for all employees. The Compensation Committee does not rely upon a fixed formula or specific numerical criteria in determining each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation or the allocation of compensation among the various components of compensation described below. Moreover, we do

not have a specific policy for the allocation of compensation between short-term and long-term compensation or cash and equity compensation. Rather, the Compensation Committee exercises its business judgment in determining total compensation based upon the following criteria

 

 

Based upon its analysis of these criteria, the Compensation Committee determines each component of executive compensation (as discussed below) for the Named Executive Officers, taking into consideration the total compensation relative to the median for the Peer Group (as defined in “— Benchmarking” below). Compensation decisions in 2007 did not include a detailed evaluation of the compensation structure due to the fact that the Merger was pending and the Merger Agreement contained customary restrictions on changing the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

 

Role of Management in Executive Compensation Decisions

 

Generally, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee as it relates to the compensation of the other executive officers. In addition, our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice Presidents of Human Resources, provide input and make proposals regarding the design, operation, objectives and values of the various components of compensation in order to provide appropriate performance and retention incentives for key employees. These proposals may be made on the initiative of the Chief Executive Officer, the executive officers or upon the request of the Compensation Committee.

 

Executive Compensation Consultants

 

The Compensation Committee retained Mercer Human Resource Consulting, Inc. (“Mercer”) during 2007 to assist it with the evaluation of executive compensation. Mercer analyzed and provided comparative executive compensation data and compensation program proposals for the Compensation Committee’s consideration in evaluating and setting the compensation of the Named Executive Officers and the overall structure of our compensation policies. Upon the Compensation Committee’s prior approval, Mercer also provided human resource consulting services to management from time to time during 2007. The Compensation Committee does not believe that these other services compromised Mercer’s ability to provide the Compensation Committee with an independent perspective on executive compensation. See “— Executive Compensation Decisions during 2007 and 2008” below for more information regarding the appointment of compensation consultants for 2008.

 

Benchmarking

 

During 2007, the Compensation Committee did not undertake any benchmarking given the announcement of the Merger. During 2006, to ensure that we are competitive in attracting and retaining executive talent, we benchmarked our executive compensation against a peer group consisting of 14 companies in similar businesses, including mortgage, leasing and financial services companies, and/or of similar size based on total sales and total assets (the “Peer Group”). The Peer Group consisted of the following companies:

 

Mercer provided the Compensation Committee with executive compensation information for the Peer Group as well as survey data from multiple national compensation surveys (the “Survey Data”) in order to assist in the compensation evaluation due to the unique nature of our business segments and the lack of peer companies with a similar business segment mix for comparison. During 2006, the Compensation Committee evaluated the base salary, short-term and long-term incentives and actual and target total compensation levels for the Peer Group and Survey Data, including the median and percentile ranges for each compensation component, for comparison with that of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee determined that total executive compensation for the Named Executive Officers should be targeted at or slightly above the median of the compensation of the Peer Group in order to be competitive with the compensation structure of the Peer Group and to attract and retain executive talent. These targets may be adjusted based upon the specific responsibilities, experience and performance of each Named Executive Officer as well as other factors in the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

 

Components of Executive Compensation

 

The primary components of the executive compensation arrangements for our Named Executive Officers are base salaries, variable compensation programs and long-term incentive awards.

 

Base Salaries.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the base salary of our Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers, which includes the review and approval of annual adjustments to their base compensation. Base salaries are intended to provide a level of cash compensation that is externally competitive in relation to the responsibilities of the executive’s position in order to attract and retain executive talent. The Compensation Committee determines salary levels based upon competitive compensation levels for companies in the Peer Group and Survey Data as well as consideration of the nature of the executive officer’s position and the contribution, achievement, experience and tenure of the executive officer. Mr. Edwards has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since the Spin-Off and prior to that was the President and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Mortgage from February 1996 until the Spin-Off. In August 2005, Mr. Edwards resumed his role as President and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Mortgage in addition to his corporate role. Each of our other Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Raubenstine, has been in their current position since the Spin-Off. Mr. Raubenstine was appointed to serve as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on February 23, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Raubenstine’s employment with us, he receives a greater percentage of his total compensation as base salary and is not eligible to participate in the annual management incentive plans. See “Executive Officers” above for more information regarding positions held by each Named Executive Officer in the past five years.

 

During 2007, the Compensation Committee did not undertake a detailed evaluation of the compensation structure of our Named Executive Officers due to the announcement of the Merger and certain restrictions upon compensation matters for the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Merger Agreement. The Compensation Committee made no changes to the base salaries for the Named Executive Officers for 2007. The following table sets forth the annual base salaries for the Named Executive Officers for 2007.

 

 

Variable Compensation Programs.  Our Named Executive Officers may receive additional cash compensation through participation in our annual management incentive plans for PHH, PHH Mortgage and PHH Arval (“MIPs”) that are designed to motivate eligible recipients to achieve our short-term objectives. Generally, each

executive officer, except for Mr. Raubenstine, is eligible to receive an annual cash incentive payout calculated as a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary and based upon the achievement of performance targets related to consolidated results, operating segment results, individual executive officer performance and/or other performance targets established by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. The payout target increases as a percentage of base salary with the executive officer’s duties and responsibilities in order to tie a greater percentage of the executive officer’s compensation to the achievement of our annual performance objectives.

 

The Compensation Committee generally sets the performance targets under the MIPs at levels which are considered to be challenging based on historical performance, industry and market conditions and adjusts such targets each year to coincide with our overall strategy, financial performance targets and other factors. Since the Spin-Off, the Compensation Committee has established the performance targets for the Named Executive Officers and all MIP eligible employees based on the pre-tax income after minority interest for PHH, PHH Mortgage and/or PHH Arval. Our performance targets are intended to be attainable if our management team provides a strong performance and we have what we consider to be a successful year. For the four years prior to 2007, the performance targets established for the PHH Mortgage MIPs were exceeded in 2003 and 2005 and not achieved in 2004 and 2006, and the performance targets established for the PHH Arval MIPs were met in 2003 and exceeded in 2004, 2005 and 2006. For the two years since the Spin-Off and prior to 2007, the performance targets for the two PHH MIPs were exceeded in 2005 and not achieved in 2006.

 

In consultation with management and Mercer, the Compensation Committee approved the 2007 PHH Arval Management Incentive Plan (the “2007 Fleet MIP”) and the 2007 PHH Mortgage Management Incentive Plan (the “2007 Mortgage MIP”) (together, the “2007 MIPs”) and established performance targets for certain of the Named Executive Officers based on the pre-tax income after minority interest for the year ended December 31, 2007 for PHH Arval and PHH Mortgage, respectively. Due to the announcement of the Merger, which was expected to close on or before December 31, 2007, the Compensation Committee did not approve a MIP for PHH. See “— Executive Compensation Decisions in 2007 and 2008” below for more information. Pursuant to the terms of the 2007 MIPs, in the event that the performance targets were achieved or exceeded, the participating Named Executive Officer would receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the Named Executive Officer’s base salary multiplied by the target payout percentage multiplied by the percentage by which the performance target for such plan was met or exceeded. The minimum payout is 100% of the target payout and the maximum payout is 125% of the target payout although the performance targets must be exceeded by more than 10% for a payout above the target payout level to occur. From 110% to 125% of the performance target, the payout is proportionate to the percentage by which the performance target is exceeded.

 

In 2006, the Compensation Committee reviewed the roles and responsibilities of each Named Executive Officer and the Peer Group and Survey Data (see “— Benchmarking” above) in evaluating the percentage of base salary for target payouts to the Named Executive Officers under the MIPs. The Compensation Committee also evaluated the target payout levels for the Named Executive Officers with the median target levels for comparable executives in the Peer Group. During 2007, the Compensation Committee did not make any adjustments to the target payouts for the Named Executive Officers from the levels established in 2006. The table below sets forth the target payout as a percentage of base salary for each of the Named Executive Officers when eligible to participate in a MIP.

 

 

The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Kilroy would participate in the 2007 Fleet MIP and Mr. Danahy would participate in the 2007 Mortgage MIP. Messrs. Edwards, Raubenstine and Brown did not

participate in either of the 2007 MIPs. See “— Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2007” for additional information regarding the target payout amounts under the 2007 MIPs for Messrs. Kilroy and Danahy.

 

In 2008, the Compensation Committee reviewed the 2007 pre-tax income after minority interest for PHH Mortgage and PHH Arval and determined that the performance targets under the 2007 Mortgage MIP had not been achieved and the performance targets under the 2007 PHH Arval were exceeded. As a result, Mr. Danahy did not receive any payout under the 2007 Mortgage MIP, and Mr. Kilroy received a payout of $521,550 under the 2007 Fleet MIP.

 

Long-Term Incentive Awards.  The Compensation Committee administers our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan, which provides for equity awards, including restricted stock units (“PHH RSUs”) and options to purchase our Common Stock (“Stock Options”). The Compensation Committee considers equity awards to our Named Executive Officers an appropriate and effective method of retaining key management employees and aligning their interests with the interests of our stockholders. Eligibility for equity awards, the number of shares underlying each award and the terms and conditions of each award are determined by the Compensation Committee upon consultation with management and the committee’s compensation consultant. In June 2005, the Compensation Committee granted an annual award of PHH RSUs and Stock Options to our Named Executive Officers, which vest beginning on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, with the opportunity to accelerate the vesting of 25% of the total award for each year prior to the fourth anniversary of the grant date based on the achievement of performance targets established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee made these awards in PHH RSUs for Messrs. Danahy and Brown. These awards were split equally between PHH RSUs and Stock Options for Messrs. Edwards and Kilroy in order to further tie their compensation to the creation of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee establishes these performance targets annually for these awards and certain other equity awards with performance-based vesting converted from Cendant awards at the time of the Spin-Off. The performance targets for these awards were determined generally in the same manner as those for the annual MIPs and were based on our 2007 pre-tax income after minority interest. See “— Variable Compensation Programs” above for additional information regarding establishing the performance targets and the difficulty in attaining such targets. In 2008, the Compensation Committee reviewed our 2007 pre-tax income after minority interest and determined that the performance targets for PHH had not been met.

 

During 2007, the Compensation Committee did not make any equity awards under the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan due to (i) the announcement of the Merger which was expected to close on or before December 31, 2007 and (ii) the delay in the filing of our financial statements with the SEC, which resulted in our Registration Statement on Form S-8 for our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Form S-8”) not being effective until we became a current filer with the SEC on June 28, 2007. See “— Executive Compensation Decisions in 2007 and 2008” below for more information.

 

Executive Compensation Decisions in 2007 and 2008

 

During 2007, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with management and Mercer, considered the impact of the Merger on certain executive officers and the need to retain those executive officers through the effective time of the Merger. In June 2007, based on these considerations, in lieu of the adoption of a PHH MIP for 2007, the Compensation Committee approved a form of retention agreement (the “Retention Agreement”) in order to create an incentive for certain of our executive officers to remain employed with us through the earlier of the effective time of the Merger or December 31, 2007. The amount of the retention bonus equaled the executive officer’s target payout under a MIP expressed as a percentage of base salary, but would be pro-rated if the effective time of the Merger was prior to December 31, 2007. If a Termination Event (as defined below) occurred prior to the effective time of the Merger, the executive officer covered by a Retention Agreement would also receive the retention bonus. On June 13, 2007, we entered into a Retention Agreement with Mr. Brown to provide him with a retention bonus of $150,000, equal to 50% of his base salary, subject to pro-ration as described above. The full retention bonus for Mr. Brown was earned on December 31, 2007 and paid in 2008.

 

The Compensation Committee also approved severance arrangements for certain executive officers as permitted under the Merger Agreement, including the form of severance agreement (the “2007 Severance Agreement”), which provided post-termination payments of severance to the executive officer in the event that

one of the following termination events occurred on or prior to the first anniversary of the effective time of the Merger: (i) the involuntary termination of employment other than for “cause” or “disability” (as such terms are defined in the 2007 Severance Agreement) or (ii) the voluntary termination of employment as a result of (a) a change in the required location of the executive officer’s employment in excess of 20 miles, (b) the material diminution of the executive officer’s duties and responsibilities as of the date of the applicable 2007 Severance Agreement, subject to certain enumerated exceptions, or (c) a reduction in the executive officer’s base salary or a material reduction in compensation opportunity as of the date of the applicable 2007 Severance Agreement. The amount of the post-termination payment for each Named Executive Officer entering into a Severance Agreement was equal to two times the sum of the Named Executive Officer’s base salary and target payout amount under the MIPs. On June 13, 2007, we entered into 2007 Severance Agreements with Messrs. Kilroy and Brown to provide such severance benefits. In the event of one of the foregoing termination events occurring on or prior to the first anniversary of the effective time of the Merger, Messrs. Kilroy and Brown would receive $1,800,000 and $900,000, respectively, in a lump sum payment, subject to certain conditions including, but not limited to, the execution of a general release of any claims against us and our affiliates.

 

In August 2007, the Compensation Committee also reviewed and approved the deferral of shares to be issued to the Named Executive Officers to satisfy the conversion of PHH RSUs earned during 2006 and 2007, which could not be issued during the Blackout Period until the earlier of the closing of the Merger or the expiration of the Blackout Period. These PHH RSUs were issued on January 8, 2008. In addition, upon consideration of the impact of the ineffectiveness of the Form S-8 from March 2006 through June 2007 and the additional restrictions on executive officers to convert Stock Options during the pendency of the Merger, the Compensation Committee amended the award agreements to extend the expiration date for Stock Options converted from Cendant awards at the time of the Spin-Off for certain executive officers, including Mr. Brown, that were scheduled to expire in 2007. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to extend the expiration date for these Stock Options until the earlier of the closing of the Merger or 30 days after the date the exercise of such Stock Options would not violate any applicable federal, state or local law. Following the termination of the Merger, these Stock Options expired in the first quarter of 2008.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with management and Mercer, began evaluating potential equity awards to executive officers and other employees in the event that the Merger was not consummated. The Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s equity awards since the Spin-Off, noting that no equity awards had been granted to employees since 2005 and that certain employees had been precluded from realizing the value of previously issued equity awards due to the Blackout Period and Merger. In light of these considerations, the Compensation Committee discussed increasing the size of the awards in order to address the lack of equity awards in 2006 and 2007 and to reenergize and retain employees in the event the Merger was not consummated. Following the termination of the Merger, on January 10, 2008, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with management and Mercer, approved the award of PHH RSUs to employees eligible to participate in the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan, including the Named Executive Officers (the “2008 RSU Awards”). The 2008 RSU Awards vest annually in two equal installments beginning on January 10, 2012, subject to potential accelerated vesting of the total award in up to one-third increments upon the achievement of financial performance targets to be set by the Compensation Committee for each of the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010. The following table sets forth the 2008 RSU Awards to the Named Executive Officers.

 

2008 RSU Awards

 

 

 

In January 2008, the Compensation Committee determined that the Merger had a significant impact on our ability to achieve the 2007 performance targets for certain outstanding PHH RSUs and Stock Option awards to employees. The Compensation Committee noted that of the equity awards subject to annual performance targets, certain awards made on February 1, 2005 in connection with the Spin-Off to convert existing awards of stock options and restricted stock units of Cendant common stock granted in 2004 (the “2004 Conversion RSUs” and together with the stock options, the “2004 Conversion Awards”) were the only outstanding equity awards that would be forfeited in the event the annual performance targets for 2007 were not achieved. Certain other equity awards were subject to accelerated vesting in the event that we achieved performance targets for a fiscal year. See Footnote 3 of “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2007” for more information regarding the 2004 Conversion RSUs. As a result of its consideration of the impact of the Merger and the recommendation of management and discussions with Mercer, the Compensation Committee amended the 2004 Conversion Awards for all recipients, including 2004 Conversion RSUs for Messrs. Edwards, Kilroy, Danahy and Brown, which resulted in the vesting of 12.5% of the 2004 Conversion Awards as if the Company had achieved 100% of the performance targets for fiscal year 2007, provided that they remained employed with us through the vesting date. As a result of this amendment, 5,908, 5,908, 3,250 and 2,068 shares vested on April 27, 2008 for Messrs. Edwards, Kilroy, Danahy and Brown, respectively. The remaining 2004 Conversion RSUs held by these Named Executive Officers were forfeited on April 27, 2008.

 

In January 2008, the Compensation Committee approved (i) the amendment and restatement of the 2007 Severance Agreement (the “Restated Severance Agreement”) for certain executive officers and (ii) the execution of new severance agreements (the “New Severance Agreement,” together with the Restated Severance Agreement, the “Severance Agreements”) for certain other executive officers. The Severance Agreements provide post-termination payments of severance to the executive officer in the event that one of the following termination events (the “Termination Events”) occurs on or at any time prior to the first anniversary of a change in control (as such term is defined in the Severance Agreements) of the Company occurring on or before December 31, 2009: (i) the involuntary termination of employment other than for “cause” or “disability” (as such terms are defined in the Severance Agreements) or (ii) the voluntary termination of employment as a result of (a) a change in the required location of the executive officer’s employment in excess of 50 miles, (b) the material diminution of the executive officer’s duties and responsibilities as of the date of the applicable Severance Agreement, subject to certain enumerated exceptions, or (c) a reduction in the executive officer’s base salary or a material reduction in compensation opportunity as of the date of the applicable Severance Agreement. The amount of the post-termination payment for each Named Executive Officer entering into a Severance Agreement was equal to two times the sum of the Named Executive Officer’s base salary and target payout amount under the MIPs. On January 14, 2008, we entered into Restated Severance Agreements with Messrs. Kilroy and Brown and a New Severance Agreement with Mr. Danahy. In the event of a Termination Event occurring on or prior to the first anniversary of a change in control of the Company, Messrs. Kilroy, Danahy and Brown would receive $1,800,000, $1,137,500 and $900,000, respectively, in a lump sum payment, subject to certain conditions including, but not limited to, the execution of a general release of any claims against us and our affiliates.

 

In February 2008, following a change in personnel at Mercer, the Compensation Committee undertook an evaluation of several executive compensation consultants. Following this evaluation, in February 2008, the Compensation Committee retained PricewaterhouseCoopers to assist it with the evaluation of executive compensation and serve as the executive compensation consultant in 2008.

 

In March 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the performance targets for the PHH Corporation 2008 Management Incentive Plan (the “2008 PHH MIP”), PHH Mortgage 2008 Management Incentive Plan (the “2008 Mortgage MIP”) and PHH Arval 2008 Management Incentive Plan (the “2008 Fleet MIP”, and collectively, the “2008 MIPs”). The performance targets for the 2008 Mortgage MIP and the 2008 Fleet MIP are based on the attainment of certain pre-tax income after minority interest targets for the year ending December 31, 2008 for PHH Mortgage and PHH Arval, respectively. The performance target for the 2008 PHH MIP is based 50% on the

attainment of the performance target established for PHH Mortgage and 50% on the attainment of the performance target established for PHH Arval. Messrs. Edwards and Brown are participants in the 2008 PHH MIP with target payout levels equal to 100% and 50% of each of their respective salaries. Mr. Kilroy is a participant in the 2008 Fleet MIP with a target payout equal to 100% of his salary, and Mr. Danahy is a participant in the Mortgage MIP with a target payout equal to 75% of his salary. Consistent with our past practice, the performance targets for 2008 are intended to be attainable if our management team provides a strong performance and we have what we consider to be a successful year. See “— Variable Compensation Programs” above for more information regarding the establishment of performance targets. Mr. Raubenstine is not a participant in the 2008 MIPs.

 

Retirement Benefits

 

Messrs Edwards, Kilroy and Brown are participants in defined benefit plans that were available to all of our employees prior to the Spin-Off, including the PHH Corporation Pension Plan (the “PHH Pension Plan”) and PHH Corporation Retiree Medical Plan (the “PHH Retiree Medical Plan”) (collectively, the “Retirement Plans”). The benefits payable under these plans have been frozen for the Named Executive Officers and the other plan participants. See “— Pension Benefits for 2007” for more information regarding benefits available to the Named Executive Officers under these plans. In addition, all of our Named Executive Officers participate in the PHH Corporation Employee Savings Plan (the “PHH Savings Plan”) on the same basis as other employees. The PHH Savings Plan is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan that provides for employee contributions made on a pre-tax basis and matching contributions by us of up to six percent of the employee’s compensation contributed to the PHH Savings Plan up to the statutory limit. See “— All Other Compensation Table” in Footnote 7 under “— Summary Compensation Table” for more information regarding matching contributions to the PHH Savings Plan made on behalf of each Named Executive Officer.

 

Perquisites

 

We provide a limited number of perquisites to our Named Executive Officers, which the Compensation Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program for executive officers and necessary to attract and retain executive talent. Our Named Executive Officers generally are provided with or have use of company vehicles, financial planning services and tax reimbursements on the foregoing perquisites. In addition, Messrs. Raubenstine and Kilroy received fuel costs and tax reimbursements thereon for their company vehicles. Due to the nature of his position, Mr. Raubenstine is required to split his time between our New Jersey and Maryland offices. While Mr. Raubenstine lives in the greater Philadelphia area, he spends more than 50% of his time in our Maryland offices and, therefore, is treated as being domiciled in Maryland for tax purposes. As a result, certain of his travel, meals and lodging expenses for performing services for us are not deductible business expenses and are recognized as compensation. Due to the frequent travel to both offices, we also provide Mr. Raubenstine with a car service. We reimburse Mr. Raubenstine for these expenses and provide a tax gross-up so that he incurs no additional taxes as a result of these payments. See “— All Other Compensation Table” in Footnote 7 under “— Summary Compensation Table” for more information regarding perquisites.

 

Change in Control and Other Severance Arrangements

 

We maintain severance policies which provide benefits in the event of a termination without cause for executive officers who are not a party to a severance agreement. Following the announcement of the Merger, the Compensation Committee reviewed and approved severance agreements for certain executive officers and employees. As discussed above under “— Executive Compensation Decisions in 2007 and 2008,” in the event of their involuntary termination other than for “cause” or “disability” or their voluntary termination of employment as a result of relocation, elimination of duties or reduction in compensation on or at any time prior to the first anniversary of a change in control of the Company occurring on or before December 31, 2009, Messrs. Kilroy, Danahy and Brown would receive $1,800,000, $1,137,500 and $900,000, respectively, in a lump sum payment, subject to certain conditions including, but not limited to, the execution of a general release of any claims against us and our affiliates. We have not entered into any severance agreements with Messrs. Edwards and Raubenstine.

 

In addition, all unvested Stock Options granted to each of the Named Executive Officers under our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan generally will become fully and immediately vested and exercisable, and all PHH RSUs will vest

upon the occurrence of a change in control transaction (as defined in the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan). See “— Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” below for additional information regarding payments in the event of a change in control or other termination of employment for each Named Executive Officer.

 

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

 

In accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the deductibility for federal corporate income tax purposes of compensation paid to certain of our individual executive officers in excess of $1 million in any year may be restricted. The Compensation Committee believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to comply with such tax law, while still maintaining the goals of our compensation programs. Accordingly, where it is deemed necessary and in our best interests to attract and retain the best possible executive talent and to motivate such executives to achieve the goals inherent in our business strategy, the Compensation Committee will recommend compensation to executive officers which may exceed the limits of deductibility. In this regard, certain portions of compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers may not be deductible for federal income tax purposes under Section 162(m).

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on such review, recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

James W. Brinkley (Chairman)
A.B. Krongard
Ann D. Logan

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

 

The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of “outside directors” within the meaning of the regulations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, “non-employee directors” under SEC Rule 16b-3, and “independent” directors as affirmatively determined by the Board of Directors pursuant to the NYSE Listing Standards. The members of the Compensation Committee are the individuals named as signatories to the report immediately preceding this paragraph. None of the members of the Compensation Committee are our former officers or employees.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The information below sets forth the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2007 (collectively referred to as our “Named Executive Officers”). The form and amount of the compensation paid or to be paid to our Named Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2007 was determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Compensation Table for 2007

 

		Life and				401(k)												Travel,
		Disability				Matching				Financial				Company				Meals
		Insurance				Contrib-				Planning				Car and				and				Tax
		Coverage				ution				Services				Fuel				Lodging				Gross-Up				Total
		(a)				(b)				(c)				(d)				(e)				(f)
Terence W. Edwards		$	3,192			$	13,500			$	10,420			$	11,220			$	—			$	10,608			$	48,940
Clair M. Raubenstine			5,129				13,500				—				10,250				41,233				21,878				91,990
George J. Kilroy			2,550				5,192				—				12,250				—				7,576				27,568
Mark R. Danahy			1,851				13,500				7,300				9,460				—				7,915				40,026
William F. Brown			1,711				13,308				7,820				10,238				—				9,319				42,396

 

    ­ ­

 

 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2007

 

The following table sets forth the grants of plan-based awards for 2007, including non-equity incentive plan awards under the 2007 Mortgage MIP and 2007 Fleet MIP. There were no equity-based awards made to the Named Executive Officers during 2007.

 

 

 

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END FOR 2007

 

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards, including PHH RSUs and Stock Options, for each of our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2007. All PHH RSUs and Stock Options earned during 2007 pursuant to the vesting terms of existing award agreements are presented in the table. The PHH RSUs earned during 2007 were not converted to shares of our Common Stock until January 8, 2008 following the expiration of the Blackout Period and termination of the Merger. See “— Executive Compensation Decisions in 2007 and 2008” for more information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR 2007

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the number and value of our Common Stock that vested during 2007 for our Named Executive Officers. The shares of our Common Stock listed in the table below were not issued to the Named Executive Officers until January 8, 2008 following the expiration of the Blackout Period and termination of the Merger. There were no Stock Option exercises by the Named Executive Officers during 2007.

 

 

 

PENSION BENEFITS FOR 2007

 

The following table sets forth information relating to the PHH Pension Plan, which is a defined benefit employee pension plan adopted as of the Spin-Off. The PHH Pension Plan is identical in all material respects to the Cendant Corporation Pension Plan (the “Cendant Pension Plan”), under which benefits were frozen for participants including our Named Executive Officers. The PHH Pension Plan assumed all liabilities and obligations owed under the Cendant Pension Plan to Cendant Pension Plan participants who were actively employed by us at the time of the Spin-Off, including Messrs. Edwards, Kilroy and Brown. Certain of our employees, including Messrs. Raubenstine and Danahy, were not participants in the Cendant Pension Plan and are not participants in the PHH Pension Plan.

The benefits under the PHH Pension Plan that are accrued to the participating Named Executive Officers were frozen and such officers may not accrue further benefits under the PHH Pension Plan.

 

 

 

 

No pension benefits were paid to the Named Executive Officers in 2007. Each of the Named Executive Officers, other than Messrs. Raubenstine and Danahy, is eligible to receive a benefit under the PHH Pension Plan based on 2% of their final average cash compensation times their number of years of benefit service (up to a maximum of 30 years) minus 50% of their annualized primary Social Security benefit. For purposes of determining the participating Named Executive Officers’ benefits under the PHH Pension Plan, their final average compensation and years of benefit service was based on compensation and service earned prior to October 31, 1999 (October 31, 2004 for Mr. Kilroy). The participating Named Executive Officers will not accrue any additional benefits under the PHH Pension Plan or under any other defined benefit plan sponsored by us or Cendant after October 31, 1999 (October 31, 2004 for Mr. Kilroy).

 

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 2007

 

The table below sets forth information relating to the PHH Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) established by our Board of Directors in 1994 for specified executive officers at that time. The Deferred Compensation Plan was frozen to further participation in 1997 and Mr. Edwards is the only Named Executive Officer eligible to participate in the plan.

 

 

 

 

There were no contributions to, or distributions or withdrawals from, the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2007. The Deferred Compensation Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan pursuant to which participants may elect to defer up to 100% of their annual salary and any awards under a non-equity incentive plan. All deferrals by participants are 100% vested at all times. The Deferred Compensation Plan is unfunded for tax purposes and a bookkeeping account is established for each participant. Amounts deferred are credited with any associated earnings in accordance with hypothetical investment options elected by the participant from the investment options, including mutual funds and other funds, available under the PHH Savings Plan, except for the fund which invests in our Common Stock. Participants are entitled to a distribution under the Deferred Compensation Plan when they cease employment with us for any reason. Distributions may be made in lump sum or in monthly, quarterly or annual installments for up to ten years at the election of the participant.

 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

 

The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would be provided to each Named Executive Officer who was employed by us on December 31, 2007, pursuant to the terms of any contract, agreement, plan or arrangement that provides for such payments and benefits following, or in connection with, a termination of the Named Executive Officer, including by voluntary termination, involuntary termination not for cause, involuntary termination for cause, retirement, death or disability or a change in control with or without a termination of the Named Executive Officer. For purposes of calculating the amounts in the table, we have assumed that the termination or change in control event took place on December 31, 2007, the last business day of our most recently completed fiscal year, and used the closing price of our Common Stock on such date ($17.64 per share) for purposes of calculating the value of any stock awards in accordance with the SEC rules under the Exchange Act. See the discussion that follows the table for additional information regarding the estimated payments and benefits.