497
The
information in this prospectus supplement is not complete and
may be changed. A registration statement relating to these
securities has been declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. This prospectus supplement is not an offer
to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to
buy these securities in any state where the offer and sale is
not permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 497(c)
Registration
No. 333-143819
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION DATED OCTOBER 10, 2007
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated September 6, 2007)
3,750,000 Shares
Common
Stock
We are offering 3,750,000 shares of our common stock. We
will use the proceeds to repay debt and fund additional
investments from our investment pipeline and for general
corporate purposes. Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol PSEC. On
October 9, 2007, the last sale price reported for our
common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market was $17.15 per share.
Prospect Capital Corporation is a financial services company
that primarily lends to and invests in middle market, privately
held or thinly traded public companies. We are organized as an
externally-managed, non-diversified closed-end management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Prospect Capital Management, LLC manages our investments, and
Prospect Administration, LLC provides the administrative
services necessary for us to operate.
Please read this prospectus supplement, and the accompanying
prospectus, before investing, and keep it for future reference.
The prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
contain important information about us that a prospective
investor should know before investing in our common stock. We
file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and
other information about us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This information is available free of charge by
contacting us at 10 East
40th Street,
44th Floor,
New York, NY 10016 or by telephone at
(212) 448-0702
or on our website at www.prospectstreet.com. The information on
our website is not incorporated by reference into this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. The
Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a website at
www.sec.gov that contains such information.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on
page S-5
of this prospectus supplement and on page 12 of the
accompanying prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount (sales load)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to us before
expenses(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Before deducting estimated offering
expenses payable by us of approximately $200,000.
|
The underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional
562,500 shares of common stock at the public offering
price, less the underwriting discount, within 30 days from
the date of this prospectus supplement solely to cover
over-allotments. If the over-allotment option is exercised in
full, the total public offering price will be
$ ,
and the total underwriting discount (sales load) will be
$ .
The proceeds to us would be
$ ,
before deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us of
approximately $200,000.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares on or about
October , 2007.
|
|
|
Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc. |
RBC
Capital Markets |
Oppenheimer
& Co. Inc. |
Sole
Book-Running Manager
BB&T
Capital Markets
A
Division of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
|
|
D.A.
Davidson & Co. |
Janney
Montgomery Scott LLC |
The date of this prospectus supplement is
October , 2007.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have
not and the underwriters have not authorized any other person to
provide you with information that is different from that
contained in this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or
inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. You should
assume that the information appearing in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus is accurate only as
of their respective dates. Our business, financial and results
of operations may have changed since those dates. This
prospectus supplement supersedes the accompanying prospectus to
the extent it contains information that is different from or
additional to the information in that prospectus.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
|
|
S-18
|
|
|
|
|
S-19
|
|
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
|
|
|
S-23
|
|
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
-i-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
|
|
-ii-
This summary highlights some information from this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, and it may not
contain all of the information that is important to you. To
understand the terms of the common stock offered hereby, you
should read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus carefully. Together, these documents describe the
specific terms of the shares we are offering. You should
carefully read the sections titled Risk Factors in
this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus
and the documents identified in the section Additional
Information. Except as otherwise noted, all information in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option.
The terms we, us, our,
Company and Prospect Capital refer to
Prospect Capital Corporation; Prospect Capital
Management or the Investment Adviser refers to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC; Prospect
Administration or the Administrator refers to
Prospect Administration, LLC.
The
Company
Prospect Capital is a financial services company that primarily
lends to and invests in middle market privately held or thinly
traded public companies. We are organized as an
externally-managed, non-diversified closed-end management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a business
development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the 1940 Act.)
Typically, we concentrate on making investments in companies
with annual revenues of less than $500 million and
enterprise values of less than $250 million. Our typical
investment involves a secured loan of less than $50 million
with some form of equity participation. From time to time, we
acquire controlling interests in companies in conjunction with
making secured debt investments in such companies. In most
cases, companies in which we invest are privately held or have
thinly traded public securities at the time we invest in them.
We refer to these companies as target or
middle market companies and these investments as
middle market investments.
We seek to maximize total returns to our investors, including
both current yield and equity upside, by applying rigorous
credit analysis and asset-based and cash-flow based lending
techniques to make and monitor our investments. A majority of
our investments to date have been in energy-related industries,
which are benefiting from commodity prices that have risen
significantly in recent years. We have made no investments to
date in the real estate or mortgage industries, and we do not
intend to concentrate on such investments. We are currently
benefiting from enhanced lending spreads made available by the
credit dislocations in July and August of 2007 in the syndicated
loan market, a market where we historically had not concentrated
due to mispricing concerns, but where we currently see many
attractive opportunities to deploy capital.
As of October 10, 2007, we held investments in 28 portfolio
companies. The aggregate fair value as of June 30, 2007 of
investments in 24 portfolio companies (including a net profits
interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC
(Charlevoix)) held on that date, plus the cost of
four new investments made since that date, is approximately
$355.5 million. For the period ended June 30, 2007,
the weighted average yield on all of our outstanding investments
in long-term debt securities issued by our portfolio companies
was 15.9% (17.1% including dividend paying equity securities).
As of October 10, 2007, we have executed non-binding
letters of intent with 12 companies to make investments
aggregating approximately $200 million. The proposed
investments are subject to certain conditions including due
diligence, approval of our investment committee and negotiation
and execution of definitive investment agreements. We may
consummate less than all or none of the investments that are
subject to these non-binding letters of intent.
Recent
Developments
On September 6, 2007, we declared a dividend of $0.3925 per
share for the first quarter of the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2008.
S-1
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
3,750,000 shares. |
|
Common stock outstanding prior to this offering |
|
20,021,138 shares. |
|
Common stock outstanding after this offering |
|
23,771,138 shares. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect to use approximately $70 million of the net
proceeds of this offering to repay amounts outstanding under our
revolving credit facility. After such repayment, our revolving
credit facility will be fully available to fund additional
investments. We expect to use the remainder of the net proceeds
to fund investments from our investment pipeline and for general
corporate purposes. See Use of Proceeds in this
prospectus supplement. |
|
The NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
PSEC |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus and other information in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for a
discussion of factors you should carefully consider before
deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. |
|
Current distribution rate |
|
For the first fiscal quarter of 2008, our Board of Directors
declared a quarterly dividend of $0.3925 per share, representing
the Companys twelfth consecutive quarterly dividend
increase and an annualized dividend yield of 9.2% based on our
October 9, 2007 closing stock price of $17.15 per share.
Our dividend is subject to change or discontinuance at any time
in the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our future earnings
and operating cash flow may not be sufficient to support a
dividend. |
S-2
Fees and
Expenses
The following tables are intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. In these tables, we assume that we
have borrowed $200 million under our credit facility, which
is the maximum amount available under the credit facility.
Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this
prospectus supplement contains a reference to fees or expenses
paid by you, us or Prospect
Capital, or that we will pay fees or expenses,
Prospect Capital will pay such fees and expenses out of our net
assets and, consequently, you will indirectly bear such fees or
expenses as an investor in Prospect Capital. However, you will
not be required to deliver any money or otherwise bear personal
liability or responsibility for such fees or expenses.
Stockholder
Transaction Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering
price)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Offering expenses borne by us (as a percentage of offering
price)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
expenses(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common
stock):(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined base management fee
(3.38%(5))
and incentive fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement
(20% of realized capital gains and 20% of pre-incentive fee net
investment income)
(2.78%(6))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.16
|
%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
%(7)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
%(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total annual expenses (estimated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.92
|
%(6)(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
The following table demonstrates the projected dollar amount of
cumulative expenses we would pay out of net assets and that you
would indirectly bear over various periods with respect to a
hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the
following expense amounts, we have assumed that our annual
operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the
table above and that we pay the stockholder transaction costs
shown in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
|
$
|
408.1
|
|
|
$
|
676.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,472.8
|
|
While the table assumes, as required by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC), a 5% annual return,
our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or
less than 5%. The income incentive fee under the Investment
Advisory Agreement would be zero at the 5% annual return
assumption required by the SEC for this table, since no
incentive fee is paid until the annual return exceeds 7%.
However, we have reflected in the example the income incentive
fee earned during our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as if
the annual return were at the level recently achieved, which is
higher than 5%. Accordingly, the resulting calculations
overstate expenses at the 5% annual return as these calculations
do not reflect the provisions of the Investment Advisory
Agreement as it would actually be applied in the case of a 5%
annual return (which would eliminate the income incentive fee,
which is nevertheless not eliminated above). This table assumes
that we will not realize any capital gains computed net of all
realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation in
any of the indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient
returns on our investments, including through the realization of
capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount,
our expenses, and returns to our investors after such expenses,
would be higher than shown above. If we only earn a 5% annual
return our expenses will be lower than shown above. In addition,
while the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and
distributions at net asset value (NAV), participants
in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of
shares of our common stock, determined by dividing the total
dollar amount of the
S-3
dividend payable to a participant by the market price per share
of our common stock at the close of trading on the valuation
date for the dividend. See Dividend Reinvestment
Plan in the accompanying prospectus for additional
information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
This example and the expenses in the table above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual
expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other
expenses) may be greater or less than those shown.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The underwriting discount with
respect to our common stock sold in this offering, which is a
one-time fee, is the only sales load paid in connection with
this offering.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The offering expenses of this
offering are estimated to be approximately $200,000.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The expenses of the dividend
reinvestment plan are included in other expenses.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Net assets attributable to our
common stock equal net assets (i.e., total assets less
liabilities other than liabilities for money borrowed for
investment purposes) at June 30, 2007. See
Capitalization in this prospectus supplement.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Our base management fee is 2.00% of
our gross assets (which include any amount borrowed, i.e., total
assets without deduction for any liabilities). Assuming that we
have borrowed $200 million (the size of our credit
facility), the 2.00% management fee of gross assets equals 3.38%
of net assets. See Management Investment
Advisory Agreement in the accompanying prospectus and
footnote 7 below.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Based on the level of incentive fee
paid during our last fiscal year, all of which consisted of an
income incentive fee. For a more detailed discussion of the
calculation of the two-part incentive fee, see
Management Investment Advisory Agreement
in the accompanying prospectus.
|
|
(7)
|
|
We may borrow additional money
before and after the proceeds of this offering are substantially
invested, but, in general, will utilize debt to the maximum
extent reasonably possible before issuing equity. After this
offering, we will have no amounts outstanding under our
$200 million credit facility. For more information, see
Risk Factors Changes in interest rates may
affect our cost of capital and net investment income below
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Capital Raising
Activities in the accompanying prospectus. The table above
assumes that we have borrowed $200 million under our credit
facility, which is the maximum amount available under the credit
facility. If we do not borrow amounts following this offering,
our base management fee, as a percentage of net assets
attributable to common stock, will decrease from the percentage
shown in the table above, as borrowings will not represent a
proportion of our overall assets.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Other expense is based
on our expenses during our last fiscal year. See
Management Administration Agreement in
the accompanying prospectus.
|
S-4
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus, before
you decide whether to make an investment in our common stock.
The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face. If any
of the adverse events or conditions described below occur, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected, our NAV and the trading price of
our common stock could decline, we could reduce or eliminate our
dividend and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Relating To Our Business And Structure
We are
dependent upon Prospect Managements key management
personnel for our future success.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business
contacts of the senior management of Prospect Management. We
also depend, to a significant extent, on our Investment
Advisers access to the investment professionals and the
information and deal flow generated by these investment
professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio
management activities. The senior management team evaluates,
negotiates, structures, closes, monitors and services our
investments. Our success depends to a significant extent on the
continued service of the senior management team, particularly
John F. Barry III and M. Grier Eliasek. The departure of
any of the senior managers of Prospect Management could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment
objective. In addition, we can offer no assurance that Prospect
Management will remain our investment adviser or that we will
continue to have access to its investment professionals or its
information and deal flow.
Our
Investment Adviser and its senior management have limited
experience managing a business development company under the
1940 Act.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of
business development companies. For example, business
development companies are required to invest at least 70% of
their total assets primarily in securities of privately held or
thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high
quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our
Investment Advisers and its senior managements
limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such
constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve
our investment objective. In addition, our investment strategies
differ in some ways from those of other investment funds that
have been managed in the past by the investment professionals.
We are
a relatively new company with limited operating
history.
We were incorporated in April 2004 and have conducted investment
operations since July 2004. We are subject to all of the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any new
business enterprise, including the risk that we may not achieve
our investment objective and that the value of your investment
in us could decline substantially or fall to zero. We completed
our initial public offering on July 27, 2004. As of
June 30, 2007, we continue to pursue our investment
strategy and 88.7% of our portfolio is invested in long-term
investments, with the remainder invested in U.S. government
and money market securities. Dividends that we pay prior to
being fully invested may be substantially lower than the
dividends that we expect to pay when our portfolio is fully
invested. If we do not realize yields in excess of our expenses,
we may incur operating losses and the market price of our shares
may decline.
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our
ability to manage our future growth effectively.
Prospect Management has been registered as an investment adviser
since March 31, 2004, and Prospect Capital has been
organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004. As such, each entity is subject to the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any young
business enterprise, including the limited experience in
managing or operating a business development company under the
1940 Act. Our ability
S-5
to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability to
grow, which depends, in turn, on our Investment Advisers
ability to continue to identify, analyze, invest in and monitor
companies that meet our investment criteria. Accomplishing this
result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our
Investment Advisers structuring of investments, its
ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services
to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms. As we
grow, we and Prospect Management need to continue to hire,
train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our
future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we make in target companies. We compete with
other business development companies, public and private funds,
commercial and investment banks and commercial financing
companies. Additionally, because competition for investment
opportunities generally has increased among alternative
investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have
begun to invest in areas they have not traditionally invested
in, including investments in middle-market companies. As a
result of these new entrants, competition for investment
opportunities at middle-market companies has intensified and we
expect that trend to continue.
Many of our existing and potential competitors are substantially
larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and
marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors
may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources
that are not available to us. In addition, some of our
competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk
assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety
of investments and establish more relationships than we.
Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the
regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a
business development company. We cannot assure you that the
competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Also, as a result of existing and increasing
competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive
investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no
assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments
that are consistent with our investment objective.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates
that we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make
loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than
the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we
do not match our competitors pricing, terms and structure.
If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure,
we may experience decreased net interest income and increased
risk of credit loss.
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company affect
our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional
capital.
We may issue debt securities or preferred stock
and/or
borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which
we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to
the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the
provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business
development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts
such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals
at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the
value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this
test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of
our investments or sell additional shares of common stock and,
depending on the nature of our leverage, to repay a portion of
our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be
disadvantageous. In addition, issuance of additional securities
could dilute the percentage ownership of our current
stockholders in us.
As a business development company regulated under provisions of
the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to issue and sell our
common stock at a price below the current NAV per share. We may,
however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights
to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current NAV of
our common stock in a rights offering to our stockholders or if
(1) our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in
the Companys and our stockholders best interests,
(2) our stockholders approve the sale of our common stock
at a price that is less than the current NAV (which our
stockholders have done for the
S-6
period through November 29, 2007), and (3) the price
at which our common stock is to be issued and sold may not be
less than a price which, in the determination of our Board of
Directors, closely approximates the market value of such
securities (less any sales load).
In addition, we may securitize our loans to generate cash for
funding new investments. To securitize loans, we may create a
wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to such
subsidiary. This could include the sale of interests in the
loans by the subsidiary on a nonrecourse basis to purchasers who
we would expect to be willing to accept a lower interest rate to
invest in investment grade loan pools. We would retain a portion
of the equity in the securitized pool of loans. An inability to
successfully securitize our loan portfolio could limit our
ability to grow our business and fully execute our business
strategy, and could decrease our earnings, if any. Moreover, the
successful securitization of our loan portfolio might expose us
to losses because the residual loans in which we do not sell
interests may tend to be those that are riskier and more likely
to generate losses.
If we
fail to qualify as a regulated investment company, we will have
to pay corporate-level taxes on our income, and our income
available for distribution would be reduced.
To maintain our qualification for federal income tax purposes
and as a regulated investment company (a RIC) under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
and obtain RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain source of
income, asset diversification and annual distribution
requirements. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is
satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income
and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized
net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an
annual basis. Because we expect to use debt financing in the
future, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio
requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants that
could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making
distributions necessary to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we
are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to
qualify for RIC tax treatment and, thus, may be subject to
corporate-level income tax. To maintain our qualification as a
RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification
requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to
meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain
investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status.
Because most of our investments are in private companies, any
such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and
may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC
for any reason or become subject to corporate income tax, the
resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net
assets, the amount of income available for distribution, and the
actual amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a
material adverse effect on us and our shares. For additional
information regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements,
see Regulation Senior securities and
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations in the accompanying prospectus.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain
amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original
issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in
connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other
circumstances, or payment-inkind interest, which represents
contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the
end of the loan term. Such original issue discount, which could
be significant relative to our overall investment activities, or
increases in loan balances as a result of
payment-in-kind
arrangements, are included in our income before we receive any
corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash.
While we focus primarily on investments that will generate a
current cash return, our investment portfolio may also include
securities that do not pay some or all of their return in
periodic current cash distributions.
The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on
income that may include interest that has been accrued but not
yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan
that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible
that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the
income incentive fee will become uncollectible.
S-7
Since in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least
90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if
any, to maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to
sell some of our investments at times we would not consider
advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce
new investment originations to meet these distribution
requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other
sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus
become subject to corporate-level income tax. See Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations Taxation
As A RIC in the accompanying prospectus.
If we
issue senior securities, including debt, you will be exposed to
additional risks, including the typical risks associated with
leverage.
|
|
|
|
|
You will be exposed to increased risk of loss if we incur debt
to make investments. If we do incur debt, a decrease in the
value of our investments or in our revenues would have a greater
negative impact on the value of our common stock than if we did
not use debt.
|
|
|
|
Our ability to pay dividends would be restricted if our asset
coverage ratio were not at least 200% and any amounts that we
use to service our indebtedness would not be available for
dividends to our common stockholders.
|
|
|
|
It is likely that any debt we incur will be governed by an
indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting
our operating flexibility.
|
|
|
|
We and you will bear the cost of issuing and servicing our
senior securities.
|
|
|
|
Any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the
future may have rights, preferences and privileges more
favorable than those of our common stock.
|
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
We expect that a significant portion of our debt investments
will bear interest at fixed rates and the value of these
investments could be negatively affected by increases in market
interest rates. In addition, an increase in interest rates would
make it more expensive to use debt to finance our investments.
As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates
could both reduce the value of our portfolio investments and
increase our cost of capital, which would reduce our net
investment income.
We
need to raise additional capital to grow because we must
distribute most of our income.
We need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. A
reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our
ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary
income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of
realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our
shareholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, such
earnings are not available to fund investment originations. We
have sought additional capital by borrowing from financial
institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity
securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from
other sources to fund our investments, it could limit our
ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value
of our securities. In addition, as a business development
company, we are generally required to maintain a ratio of at
least 200% of total assets to total borrowings, which may
restrict our ability to borrow in certain circumstances.
Most
of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a
result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
A large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of
securities of privately held or thinly traded public companies.
The fair value of these securities is often not readily
determinable. The determination of fair value, and thus the
amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year, is to a
degree subjective, and the Investment Adviser has a conflict of
interest in making the determination. We value these securities
quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors based on input from our Investment Adviser, a third
party independent valuation firm and our audit committee. Our
Board of Directors
S-8
utilizes the services of an independent valuation firm to aid it
in determining the fair value of any securities. The types of
factors that may be considered in fair value pricing of our
investments include the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the portfolio companys ability to make
payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio
company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies,
discounted cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such
valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities
and private companies, are inherently uncertain, the valuations
may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on
estimates. The determinations of fair value by our Board of
Directors may differ materially from the values that would have
been used if a ready market for these securities existed. Our
NAV could be adversely affected if the determinations regarding
the fair value of our investments were materially higher than
the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such
securities.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We generally make investments in private companies.
Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and
other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than
publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments
may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the
need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or
a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly
less than the value at which we have previously recorded our
investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our
ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the
extent that we or our Investment Adviser has material non-public
information regarding such portfolio company.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including the interest or
dividend rates payable on the debt or equity securities we
acquire, the default rate on debt securities, the level of our
expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we
encounter competition in our markets, the seasonality of the
energy industry, weather patterns, changes in energy prices and
general economic conditions. As a result of these factors,
results for any period should not be relied upon as being
indicative of performance in future periods.
Potential
conflicts of interest could impact our investment
returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers
of our Investment Adviser, Prospect Management, may serve as
officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in
the same or related lines of business as we do or of investment
funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they may have
obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of
which might not be in the best interests of us or our
stockholders. Nevertheless, it is possible that new investment
opportunities that meet our investment objective may come to the
attention of one of these entities in connection with another
investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such
opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available,
to us. However, as an investment adviser, Prospect Management
has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best interests of its
clients, including us. To that end, if Prospect Management or
its affiliates manage any additional investment vehicles or
client accounts in the future, Prospect Management will endeavor
to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable
manner over time so as not to discriminate unfairly against any
client. If Prospect Management chooses to establish another
investment fund in the future, when the investment professionals
of Prospect Management identify an investment, they will have to
choose which investment fund should make the investment.
In the course of our investing activities, under the Investment
Advisory Agreement we pay base management and incentive fees to
Prospect Management, and reimburse Prospect Management for
certain expenses it incurs. As a result of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the management team
of Prospect Management has interests that differ from those of
our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.
Prospect Management receives a quarterly income incentive fee
based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net investment income,
if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This
income incentive fee is
S-9
subject to a fixed quarterly hurdle rate before providing an
income incentive fee return to the Investment Adviser. To the
extent we or Prospect Management are able to exert influence
over our portfolio companies, the income incentive fee may
provide Prospect Management with an incentive to induce our
portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other
obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another.
This fixed hurdle rate was determined when then current interest
rates were relatively low on a historical basis. Thus, if
interest rates rise, it would become easier for our investment
income to exceed the hurdle rate and, as a result, more likely
that our Investment Adviser will receive an income incentive fee
than if interest rates on our investments remained constant or
decreased. Subject to the receipt of any requisite shareholder
approval under the 1940 Act, our Board of Directors may readjust
the hurdle rate by amending the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The income incentive fee payable by Prospect Capital is computed
and paid on income that may include interest that has been
accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company
defaults on a loan that has a deferred interest feature, it is
possible that interest accrued under such loan that has
previously been included in the calculation of the income
incentive fee will become uncollectible. If this happens, our
Investment Adviser is not required to reimburse us for any such
income incentive fee payments. If we do not have sufficient
liquid assets to pay this incentive fee or distributions to
stockholders on such accrued income, we may be required to
liquidate assets in order to do so. This fee structure could
give rise to a conflict of interest for our Investment Adviser
to the extent that it may encourage the Investment Adviser to
favor debt financings that provide for deferred interest, rather
than current cash payments of interest. In addition, the amount
of the Investment Advisers compensation under the
incentive fee due, is affected in part, by the amount of
unrealized depreciation accrued by the Company.
We have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with
Prospect Management. Under this agreement, Prospect Management
agrees to grant us a non-exclusive license to use the name
Prospect Capital. Under the license agreement, we
have the right to use the Prospect Capital name for
so long as Prospect Management or one of its affiliates remains
our Investment Adviser. In addition, we rent office space from
Prospect Administration, an affiliate of Prospect Management,
and pay Prospect Administration our allocable portion of
overhead and other expenses incurred by Prospect Administration
in performing its obligations as Administrator under the
administration agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief financial officer and chief
compliance officer and their respective staffs. This may create
conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors monitors.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws
at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and
regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed
from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these laws or
regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business. For additional information regarding the regulations
we are subject to, see Regulation in the
accompanying prospectus.
Risks
Related To Our Investments
We may
not realize gains or income from our investments.
We seek to generate both current income and capital
appreciation. However, the securities we invest in may not
appreciate and, in fact, may decline in value, and the issuers
of debt securities we invest in may default on interest
and/or
principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize
gains from our investments, and any gains that we do realize may
not be sufficient to offset any losses we experience.
Our portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio
companies in the energy industry, which subject us to a risk of
significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its
obligations under any of the securities that we hold or if the
energy industry experiences a downturn.
As of June 30, 2007, we had invested in 24 companies
in the energy industry (including a net profits interest in
Charlevoix). A consequence of this lack of diversification is
that the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly
adversely affected if a small number of such investments perform
poorly or if we need to
S-10
write down the value of any one investment. Beyond our income
tax diversification requirements, we do not have fixed
guidelines for diversification, and our investments are
concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. In addition,
to date we have concentrated on making investments in the energy
industry. While we expect to be less focused on the energy
industry in the future, we anticipate that we will continue to
have significant holdings in the energy industry. As a result, a
downturn in the energy industry could materially adversely
affect us.
The
energy industry is subject to many risks.
We have a significant concentration in the energy industry. Our
definition of energy, as used in the context of the energy
industry, is broad, and different sectors in the energy industry
may be subject to variable risks and economic pressures. As a
result, it is difficult to anticipate the impact of changing
economic and political conditions on our portfolio companies
and, as a result, our financial results. The revenues, income
(or losses) and valuations of energy companies can
fluctuate suddenly and dramatically due to any one or more of
the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Risk. While we generally do
not invest in companies that accept completely unhedged
commodity risk for an unlimited time, energy companies in
general are directly affected by energy commodity prices, such
as the market prices of crude oil, natural gas and wholesale
electricity, especially for those that own the underlying energy
commodity. In addition, the volatility of commodity prices can
affect other energy companies due to the impact of prices on the
volume of commodities transported, processed, stored or
distributed and on the cost of fuel for power generation
companies. The volatility of commodity prices can also affect
energy companies ability to access the capital markets in
light of market perception that their performance may be
directly tied to commodity prices. Historically, energy
commodity prices have been cyclical and exhibited significant
volatility. Although we generally prefer risk controls,
including appropriate commodity and other hedges, by each of our
portfolio companies, some of our portfolio companies may not
engage in hedging transactions to minimize their exposure to
commodity price risk. For those companies that engage in such
hedging transactions, they remain subject to market risks,
including market liquidity and counterparty creditworthiness.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Risk. The profitability of energy
companies could be adversely affected by changes in the
regulatory environment. The businesses of energy companies are
heavily regulated by federal, state and local governments in
diverse ways, such as the way in which energy assets are
constructed, maintained and operated and the prices energy
companies may charge for their products and services. Such
regulation can change over time in scope and intensity. For
example, a particular by-product of an energy process may be
declared hazardous by a regulatory agency, which can
unexpectedly increase production costs. Moreover, many state and
federal environmental laws provide for civil penalties as well
as regulatory remediation, thus adding to the potential
liability an energy company may face. In addition, the
deregulation of energy markets and the unresolved regulatory
issues related to some power markets such as California create
uncertainty in the regulatory environment as rules and
regulations may be adopted on a transitional basis. We cannot
assure you that the deregulation of energy markets will continue
and if it continues, whether its impact on energy
companies profitability will be positive.
|
|
|
|
Production Risk. The profitability of energy
companies may be materially impacted by the volume of crude oil,
natural gas or other energy commodities available for
transporting, processing, storing, distributing or power
generation. A significant decrease in the production of natural
gas, crude oil, coal or other energy commodities, due to the
decline of production from existing facilities, import supply
disruption, depressed commodity prices, political events,
actions of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(the OPEC) or otherwise, could reduce revenue and
operating income or increase operating costs of energy companies
and, therefore, their ability to pay debt or dividends. In
recent months, OPEC has announced changes in production quotas
in response to changing market conditions, including near record
high and volatile oil prices in the United States.
|
S-11
|
|
|
|
|
Demand Risk. A sustained decline in demand for
crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products and
electricity could materially affect revenues and cash flows of
energy companies. Factors that could lead to a decrease in
market demand include a recession or other adverse economic
conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying
commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that
increase costs, or a shift in consumer demand for such products.
|
|
|
|
Depletion and Exploration Risk. A portion of
any one energy companys assets may be dedicated to natural
gas, crude oil
and/or coal
reserves and other commodities that naturally deplete over time.
Depletion could have a material adverse impact on such
companys ability to maintain its revenue. Further,
estimates of energy reserves may not be accurate and, even if
accurate, reserves may not be fully utilized at reasonable
costs. Exploration of energy resources, especially of oil and
gas, is inherently risky and requires large amounts of capital.
|
|
|
|
Weather Risk. Unseasonable extreme weather
patterns could result in significant volatility in demand for
energy and power. This volatility may create fluctuations in
earnings of energy companies.
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk. Energy companies are subject
to various operational risks, such as failed drilling or well
development, unscheduled outages, underestimated cost
projections, unanticipated operation and maintenance expenses,
failure to obtain the necessary permits to operate and failure
of third-party contractors (for example, energy producers and
shippers) to perform their contractual obligations. In addition,
energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing cash
flow, including increasing utilization of existing facilities,
expanding operations through new construction, expanding
operations through acquisitions, or securing additional
long-term contracts. Thus, some energy companies may be subject
to construction risk, acquisition risk or other risk factors
arising from their specific business strategies.
|
|
|
|
Competition Risk. The progress in deregulating
energy markets has created more competition in the energy
industry. This competition is reflected in risks associated with
marketing and selling energy in the evolving energy market and a
competitors development of a lower-cost energy or power
source, or of a lower cost means of operations, and other risks
arising from competition.
|
|
|
|
Valuation Risk. Since mid-2001, excess power
generation capacity in certain regions of the United States
has caused substantial decreases in the market capitalization of
many energy companies. While such prices have recovered to some
extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market
capitalization will not recur, or that any future decreases in
energy company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in
nature.
|
|
|
|
Terrorism Risk. Since the
September 11th attacks, the United States government
has issued public warnings indicating that energy assets,
specifically those related to pipeline infrastructure,
production facilities and transmission and distribution
facilities, might be specific targets of terrorist activity. The
continued threat of terrorism and related military activity will
likely increase volatility for prices of natural gas and oil and
could affect the market for products and services of energy
companies. In addition, any future terrorist attack or armed
conflict in the United States or elsewhere may undermine
economic conditions in the United States in general.
|
|
|
|
Financing Risk. Some of our portfolio
companies rely on the capital markets to raise money to pay
their existing obligations. Their ability to access the capital
markets on attractive terms or at all may be affected by any of
the risks associated with energy companies described above, by
general economic and market conditions or by other factors. This
may in turn affect their ability to satisfy their obligations
with us.
|
Our
investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Some of our portfolio companies have relatively short or no
operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to
all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any
new business enterprise,
S-12
including the risk that these companies may not reach their
investment objective and the value of our investment in them may
decline substantially or fall to zero.
In addition, investment in the middle market companies that we
are targeting involves a number of other significant risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
these companies may have limited financial resources and may be
unable to meet their obligations under their securities that we
hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value
of their securities or of any collateral with respect to any
securities and a reduction in the likelihood of our realizing on
any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our
investment;
|
|
|
|
they may have shorter operating histories, narrower product
lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which
tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions
and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;
|
|
|
|
because many of these companies are privately held companies,
public information is generally not available about these
companies. As a result, we will depend on the ability of our
Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate
these companies in making investment decisions. If our
Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information
about these companies, it may not make a fully informed
investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments;
|
|
|
|
they are more likely to depend on the management talents and
efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death,
disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these
persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio
company and, in turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
they may have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in changing
businesses with products subject to a risk of obsolescence and
may require substantial additional capital to support their
operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive
position. In addition, our executive officers, directors and our
Investment Adviser could, in the ordinary course of business, be
named as defendants in litigation arising from proposed
investments or from our investments in the portfolio companies.
|
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and
harm our operating results.
Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by the
conditions and overall strength of the national, regional and
local economies, including interest rate fluctuations, changes
in the capital markets and changes in the prices of their
primary commodities and products. These factors also impact the
amount of residential, industrial and commercial growth in the
energy industry. Additionally, these factors could adversely
impact the customer base and customer collections of our
portfolio companies.
As a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible
to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay
our loans or meet other obligations during these periods.
Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase, and
the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during these
periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value
of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our
equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead
to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues,
net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also
could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the
capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend
credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing
investments and harm our operating results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate
new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if
one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though
we may have structured our interest as senior debt or preferred
equity, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the
extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to
that
S-13
portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our
debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of our
claim to those of other creditors.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities
that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such
companies.
We invest primarily in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity
securities issued by our portfolio companies. Our portfolio
companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other
debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with,
or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms,
such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to
receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in
respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in the event
of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking
senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After
repaying the senior security holders, the portfolio company may
not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation
to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with securities
in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any
distributions with other security holders in the event of an
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we
may not be in a position to control any portfolio company in
which we invest. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a
portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions
with which we disagree and the management of such company, as
representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take
risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests
as debt or preferred equity investors.
We may
not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral
securing our debt investments.
Although a substantial amount of our debt investments are
protected by holding security interests in the assets of the
portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully realize the
value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or
more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
since our debt investments are primarily made in the form of
mezzanine loans, our liens on the collateral, if any, are
subordinated to those of the senior secured debt of the
portfolio companies, if any. As a result, we may not be able to
control remedies with respect to the collateral;
|
|
|
|
the collateral may not be valuable enough to satisfy all of the
obligations under our secured loan, particularly after giving
effect to the repayment of secured debt of the portfolio company
that ranks senior to our loan;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy laws may limit our ability to realize value from the
collateral and may delay the realization process;
|
|
|
|
our rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the
failure to perfect security interests in the collateral;
|
|
|
|
how effectively the collateral would be liquidated and the value
received could be impaired or impeded by the need to obtain
regulatory and contractual consents; and
|
|
|
|
by its nature, some or all of the collateral may be illiquid and
may have no readily ascertainable market value. The liquidity
and value of the collateral could be impaired as a result of
changing economic conditions, competition, and other factors,
including the availability of suitable buyers.
|
Our
incentive fee could induce Prospect Management to make
speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Management may
create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to make
investments on our behalf that are more speculative or involve
more risk than would be the case in the absence of such
compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee
payable is determined (calculated as a percentage of the return
on invested capital) may encourage the Investment Adviser to use
leverage to increase the return on our investments. The use of
leverage would increase the
S-14
likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our
common stock. Similarly, because the Investment Adviser will
receive an incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains
realized on our investments, the Investment Adviser may invest
more than would otherwise be appropriate in companies whose
securities are likely to yield capital gains, as compared to
income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our
investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be
the case, which could result in higher investment losses,
particularly during economic downturns.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Management also
could create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to invest
on our behalf in instruments, such as zero coupon bonds, that
have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments, we
would accrue interest income over the life of the investment but
would not receive payments in cash on the investment until the
end of the term. Our net investment income used to calculate the
income incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest. For
example, accrued interest, if any, on our investments in zero
coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our
incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest
payments in respect of payment on the bond until its maturity
date. Thus, a portion of this incentive fee would be based on
income that we may not have yet received in cash.
Our
investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks
in addition to the risks inherent in U.S.
investments.
Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in
securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies
may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with
investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in
exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets
and less available information than is generally the case in the
United States, higher transaction costs, less government
supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed
bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility.
Although currently most of our investments are, and we expect
that most of our investments will be,
U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are
denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk
that the value of a particular currency will change in relation
to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may
affect currency values are trade balances, the level of
short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of
similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities
for investment and capital appreciation, and political
developments.
We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we
can offer no assurance that such strategies will be effective.
If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to
risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize
instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and
interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge
against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio
positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market
interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our
portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of
fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses
if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging
can establish other positions designed to gain from those same
developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of
such portfolio positions. Such hedging transaction may also
limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the portfolio
positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to
hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that
is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a
hedging transaction at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability
to correctly predict movements, currencies and interest rates.
Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to
reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks,
unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest
rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than
if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. The
degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments
used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio
positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of
reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation
between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings
being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from
achieving the intended hedge and expose us to
S-15
risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully
or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value
of securities denominated in
non-U.S. currencies.
Risks
Relating To Our Securities
There
is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our
dividends may not grow over time.
We have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a
quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will
achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will
allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or
year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, due
to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a business
development company, we may be limited in our ability to make
distributions. See Distributions in the accompanying
prospectus.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and
bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact
on the price of our common stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging,
delaying or making more difficult a change in control and
preventing the removal of incumbent directors. We are covered by
the Maryland Business Combination Act (the Business
Combination Act) to the extent such statute is not
superseded by applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. However,
our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution exempting any
business combination between us and any other person from the
Business Combination Act, subject to prior approval of such
business combination by our Board, including a majority of our
directors who are not interested persons as defined in the 1940
Act. In addition, the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act
(the Control Share Act) provides that control shares
of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the
Control Share Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our
shares of stock. If the applicable Board resolution is repealed
or our Board does not otherwise approve a business combination,
the Business Combination Act and the Control Share Act (if we
amend our bylaws to be subject to that Act) may discourage
others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the
difficulty of consummating any offer.
Additionally, under our charter, our Board of Directors is
divided into three classes serving staggered terms; our Board of
Directors may, without stockholder action, authorize the
issuance of shares of stock in one or more classes or series,
including preferred stock; and our Board of Directors may,
without stockholder action, amend our charter to increase the
number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have
authority to issue. The existence of these provisions, among
others, may have a negative impact on the price of our common
stock and may discourage third party bids for ownership of our
Company. These provisions may prevent any premiums being offered
to you for shares of our common stock.
Investing
in our securities may involve a high degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our
investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and
aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not
be suitable for someone with low risk tolerance.
The
market price of our securities may fluctuate
significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our securities
may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which
are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our
operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other companies
in the energy industry, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies;
|
S-16
|
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly
with respect to RICs or business development companies;
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC status;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
departure of one or more of Prospect Managements key
personnel;
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates;
|
|
|
|
litigation matters;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source.
|
We may
allocate the net proceeds from any offering in ways with which
you may not agree.
We will have significant flexibility in investing the net
proceeds of any offering of our securities. We may use the net
proceeds from the offering in ways with which you may not agree
or for investments other than those contemplated at the time of
the offering, unless such change in the use of proceeds is
subject to stockholders approval or prohibited by law.
Sales
of substantial amounts of our securities in the public market
may have an adverse effect on the market price of our
securities.
As of September 27, 2007, we have 20,021,138 shares of
common stock outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our
securities or the availability of such securities for sale could
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our securities.
If this occurs and continues it could impair our ability to
raise additional capital through the sale of securities should
we desire to do so.
S-17
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement contains forward-looking statements
that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather
are based on current expectations, estimates and projections
about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such
as anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, and estimates and variations of
these words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties,
and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and
difficult to predict and which could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements, including the risks, uncertainties
and other factors we identify in Risk Factors in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and
in our filings with the SEC.
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of
those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result,
the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also
could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability
to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and
levels of profitability and the availability of additional
capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the
inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this
prospectus supplement should not be regarded as a representation
by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those
described or identified in Risk Factors in this
prospectus supplement and Risk Factors in the
accompanying prospectus. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the
date of this prospectus supplement.
S-18
The net proceeds from the sale of 3,750,000 shares of our
common stock in this offering are
$ after deducting underwriting
discounts of $ and estimated
offering expenses of approximately $200,000 payable by us.
We expect to use approximately $70 million of the net
proceeds of this offering to repay borrowings under our credit
facility. Such borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.25%. We
expect such repayment will occur within a reasonable time period
after the closing of this offering. Once repaid, we expect the
entire amount of our credit facility to be available to fund
additional investments. We expect to use the remainder of the
net proceeds of this offering to fund investments from our
investment pipeline and for general corporate purposes.
S-19
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on an as-adjusted basis adjusted for the sale of 3,750,000
shares of our common stock in this offering, assuming a public
offering price of $17.15 per share which was the last reported
sales price of our common stock on October 9, 2007, after
deducting the underwriting discount and commissions and
estimated offering expenses of approximately $200,000 payable by
us, and our receipt of the estimated net proceeds from that sale.
|
This table should be read in conjunction with our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our financial
statements and notes thereto included in the accompanying
prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under senior credit facility
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Amount owed to affiliates
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 19,949,065 shares outstanding, actual;
23,771,138 shares outstanding, as
adjusted(2)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
299,845
|
|
|
|
362,053
|
|
Distributions in excess of net investment income
|
|
|
(4,092
|
)
|
|
|
(4,092
|
)
|
Accumulated realized gains on investments
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
300,048
|
|
|
|
362,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
304,886
|
|
|
$
|
367,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The above table reflects no debt
outstanding as of June 30, 2007. However, as of the date of
the offering, we had approximately $70 million outstanding
under our credit facility. A portion of the proceeds from the
sale of our common stock in this offering will be used to repay
all amounts outstanding under the credit facility.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 72,073 shares of common
stock issued after June 30, 2007, through our dividend
reinvestment plan.
|
S-20
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
dividends to our stockholders out of assets legally available
for distribution. Our dividends, if any, will be determined by
our Board of Directors.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we currently intend to distribute during each calendar
year an amount at least equal to the sum of
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year, and
|
|
|
|
any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years
that were not distributed during such years.
|
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess
of short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually, out of
the assets legally available for such distributions, we may
decide in the future to retain such capital gains for
investment. In such event, the consequences of our retention of
net capital gains are as described under Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations. We can offer
no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the
payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior
securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if
doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios
stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by
the terms of any of our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, cash dividends payable to stockholders will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they (or the brokers holding their shares)
specifically opt out of the dividend reinvestment
plan so as to receive cash dividends. To the extent prudent and
practicable, we intend to declare and pay dividends on a
quarterly basis.
Income from origination, structuring, closing, commitment and
other upfront fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies has been treated as taxable income and, accordingly,
distributed to shareholders. From our initial public offering
through June 30, 2007, we have distributed approximately
104.8% of our taxable income to our stockholders. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2007, we declared total dividends of
$21.6 million.
Tax characteristics of all dividends will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the calendar year. Our ability to pay dividends
could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol PSEC. The following table sets forth, for the
periods indicated, our NAV per share of common stock and the
high and low closing prices per share of our common stock as
reported on the NASDAQ Global Market. Our common stock
historically trades at prices both above and below its NAV.
There can be no assurance, however, that such premium or
discount, as applicable, to NAV will be maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
(Discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
Of Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High to NAV
|
|
To NAV
|
|
Declared
|
|
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.67
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
|
$
|
14.42
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
15.15
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.125
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0.150
|
|
S-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
(Discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
(Discount) of
|
|
Of Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
NAV(1)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High to NAV
|
|
To NAV
|
|
Declared
|
|
Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.69
|
|
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.280
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.300
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.340
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.86
|
|
|
$
|
16.77
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
|
|
15.10
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.385
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
15.18
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.3875
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
18.68
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.390
|
|
Twelve Months Ending June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
18.80
|
|
|
|
12.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3925
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
NAV per share is determined as of
the last day in the relevant quarter and therefore may not
reflect the NAV per share on the date of the high or low sales
price. The NAVs shown are based on outstanding shares at the end
of each period.
|
|
(2)
|
|
NAV has not yet been finally
determined for any day after June 30, 2007.
|
|
(3)
|
|
As declared on September 6,
2007, this dividend was payable to stockholders of record as of
September 19, 2007 and was paid on September 28, 2007.
|
On October 9, 2007, the last reported sales price of our
common stock was $17.15 per share. As of September 13,
2007, we had approximately 18,454 stockholders of record.
S-22
SELECTED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the condensed financial and other data below
with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations included in this prospectus
supplement. Financial information for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been derived from the
audited financial statements for those periods. The fiscal year
ended June 30, 2004 predated our initial public offering,
and therefore provides no meaningful information.
(all figures
in thousands except per share and other data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Year
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
40,681
|
|
|
$
|
16,869
|
|
|
$
|
8,093
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(17,550
|
)
|
|
|
(8,311
|
)
|
|
|
(5,682
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
23,131
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
16,728
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from
operations(1)
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
Distributions declared per share
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
376,502
|
|
|
|
138,480
|
|
|
|
103,909
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
76,454
|
|
|
|
30,210
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Net assets
|
|
|
300,048
|
|
|
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
Amount drawn on credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of portfolio companies at period end
|
|
|
24
|
(2)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Per share data is based on average weighted shares for
the period
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
(2) Includes a net profits interest in Charlevoix,
remaining after the loan was paid.
|
S-23
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the
Year Ended June 30, 2007
Overview
Prospect Capital is a publicly traded mezzanine debt and private
equity firm that provides investment capital to micro to middle
market companies. We invest primarily in senior and subordinated
debt and equity of companies in need of capital for
acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, project
financing and recapitalization. We work with the management
teams or financial sponsors to seek investments with historical
cash flows, asset collateral or contracted proforma cash flows.
Throughout this discussion and analysis, dollars (other than per
share data) are in thousands.
The aggregate value of our portfolio investments was $328,222
and $133,969 as of June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006,
respectively. During the fiscal year 2007, our net cost of
investments increased by $202,604, or 164%, as we invested in 10
new investments, while two of our investments repaid their loans
during the year.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, our net assets
increased by $191,778 (or 177%). The change in net assets is as
a result of an increase of $202,592 of proceeds from the
issuance of new shares of our stock and $16,728 from net
operations, offset by $27,542 in dividend distributions to our
shareholders. Out of the $16,728 from net operations, our
investment income accounted for $23,131 and realized gain on
investments of $1,949 reduced by $8,352 in unrealized
depreciation of investments. The decrease in unrealized value
was mainly associated with write-downs in our investments in
Advantage Oil Field Group, Ltd (Advantage), ESA
Environmental Specialists, Inc. (ESA), Genesis Coal
Corporation (Genesis), Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
(Unity), Whymore Coal Company, Inc.
(Whymore) and Worcester Energy Company, Inc.
(WECO). However, there were significant
write-ups in
our investments in Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(GSHI) and NRG Manufacturing, Inc. (NRG).
We seek to be a long-term investor in our portfolio companies.
As of June 30, 2007, we continue to pursue our investment
strategy and 109.4% of our net assets are invested in long-term
investments.
Our disciplined approach of investment has allowed us to invest
primarily in industries related to the industrial/energy
economy. However, we continue to strategically focus on other
sectors of the economy to diversify our portfolio holdings. We
changed our corporate name to reflect our more diversified
investment approach. Some of the companies in which we invest
have relatively short or no operating histories. These companies
are and will be subject to all of the business risk and
uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise,
including the risk that these companies may not reach their
investments objective or the value of our investments in them
may decline substantially or fall to zero.
After a robust global debt market during the earlier part of
2007, beginning in June 2007, signs of strain emerged as fears
of increasing defaults in the subprime mortgage lending market
caused a broader loss of investor confidence beyond the subprime
mortgage lending market and into the corporate leveraged loan
and high yield debt markets. Collateralized loan obligations
(CLOs) and hedge funds, in particular, have been a
driving force in the excess liquidity that existed in the debt
capital markets. The loss of investor confidence in many of
these highly leveraged investment vehicles has significantly
constrained the market for new CLO issuance.
Consequently, since June, there has been a significant reduction
in liquidity in the corporate debt capital markets and several
transactions in the high yield and leveraged loan markets have
recently been cancelled, postponed, or restructured. The extra
supply and meaningfully less demand has shifted the dynamics
between buyers and sellers and caused several hundred billion
dollars of corporate loans and bridge loan commitments to remain
on the balance sheets of financial institutions and remain
undistributed. We believe that, as of today, this reduction in
liquidity remains technically driven and has caused increased
market volatility in the secondary prices of existing leveraged
loans and high yield bonds, driving many leveraged loan and bond
market quotes to below the primary market offer price without
regard to underlying fundamental performance of many of these
issuers. The valuation of securities held within our portfolio
has not been adversely affected
S-24
by these events because we have not participated in the
syndicated loan market to date to any meaningful extent. If we
were to enter into these markets, we would be able to lend money
at higher rates of interest and would be able to purchase loans
at greater discounts than prior to the occurrence of these
events, in turn these events also could increase our cost of
financing.
Significant
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(GAAP), requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported
period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets
and any other parameters used in determining these estimates
could cause actual results to differ.
We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments
involved in the accounting policies described below have the
greatest potential impact on our financial statements. So we
consider these to be our critical accounting policies and they
are consistently applied by us:
Investments:
a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
b) Valuation:
1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
2) Short-term investments which mature in 60 days or
less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at
amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized
cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date
of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to
maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at
maturity and cost. Short-term securities which mature in more
than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their NAV as of the close of business on the day of
valuation.
3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process
which is under the direction of our Board of Directors.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in interest rates, the financial environment in which the
portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar
publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the
inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of
investments that do not have a readily available market value,
the fair value of these investments may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for such investments, and any such differences could be
material.
4) The Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) has recently issued a new pronouncement
addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Number 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). This statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157
is not expected to have a material effect on the financial
statements.
S-25
c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
d) Interest income adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income.
e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
f) Structuring fees and similar fees are recognized as
income as earned, usually when paid. Structuring fees, excess
deal deposits, net profits interests and overriding royalty
interest are included in other income.
In determining the fair value of our portfolio investments at
June 30, 2007, the Audit Committee met on August 22,
2007, and considered valuations from the independent valuation
firm and from management having an aggregate range of $310,250
to $330,876.
Our portfolio had an annualized current yield of 17.1% and 17.0%
across all our long-term debt and certain equity investments as
of June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. This
yield includes interest from all of our long-term investments as
well as dividends from GSHI. We expect the current yield to
decline over time as we increase the size of the portfolio.
Monetization of other equity positions that we hold is not
included in this yield calculation. In each of our portfolio
companies, we hold equity positions, ranging from minority
interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to
contribute to our investment returns. Many of these equity
positions include features such as contractual minimum internal
rates of returns, preferred distributions, flip structures and
other features expected to generate additional investment
returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over
junior equity, in addition to the yield and security offered by
our cash flow and collateral debt protections. Set forth below
are several views of our investment portfolio, classified by
type of investment, geographic diversification and energy sector
diversification at June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Investment
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Senior Secured Debt
|
|
|
202,243
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
%
|
|
|
92,153
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
%
|
Subordinated Secured Debt
|
|
|
78,905
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
21,154
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
43,517
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
17,610
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Warrants
|
|
|
3,451
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
369,982
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Exposure
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Midwest U.S.
|
|
$
|
36,942
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,030
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
Northeast U.S.
|
|
|
44,558
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
16,485
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
Southeast U.S.
|
|
|
70,545
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
19,849
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
Southwest U.S.
|
|
|
157,097
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
47,419
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
19,080
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
22,186
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
369,982
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Sector
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
Biofuels/Ethanol
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Biomass Power
|
|
|
25,047
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,485
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
Construction Services
|
|
|
15,305
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
19,242
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Contracting
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Gathering and Processing
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
33,100
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
41,376
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal Services
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining and Coal Production
|
|
|
18,499
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
15,876
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
Natural Gas Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Oil and Gas Production
|
|
|
110,243
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
20,661
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
Production Services
|
|
|
22,870
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
15,183
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
Shipping
|
|
|
6,553
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
369,982
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results
of Operations
Investment
Activity
We completed our 13th quarter, which was our 12th full
quarter since completion of our initial public offering on
July 27, 2004, with approximately 109.4% of our net assets
or about $328,222 invested in 24 long-term portfolio investments
(including a net profits interest remaining in Charlevoix) and
13.9% of our net assets invested in money market funds. The
remaining (23.3%) of our net assets represents liabilities in
excess of other assets.
Long-Term
Portfolio Investments
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we completed five
new investments and follow on investments in existing portfolio
companies, totaling approximately $130,409. Additionally, on
June 6, 2007, Charlevoix completely repaid its loan plus a
prepayment penalty of $352 for the loan. The Company will
maintain a net profits interest in Charlevoix. Including the
prepayment premium, the Company realized a 21% internal rate of
return on this investment, representing 1.2 times cash on cash.
On April 11, 2007, Prospect Capital provided $12,200
acquisition and growth financing to ESA, a construction,
engineering and environmental services firm located in
Charlotte, North Carolina. The investment was in the form of
senior secured notes and warrants. There were additional
fundings in May of 2007.
On June 4, 2007, Prospect Capital provided $10,750 growth
financing to Ken-Tex Energy Corp., an independent energy company
engaged in the development and production of crude oil and
natural gas hydrocarbons in East Texas. The investment was in
the form of senior secured notes, as well as net profits
interests and overriding royalty interests.
On June 26, 2007, Prospect Capital closed on a transaction
that provided $19,511 for the acquisition of R-V Industries,
Inc.
(R-V),
a diversified engineering and manufacturing company located in
Honey Brook, Pennsylvania. The investment was in the form of
senior secured notes, common shares and warrants. The investment
was funded on June 28, 2007.
On June 29, 2007, Prospect Capital closed on a transaction
that provided $45,000 growth financing to H&M
Oil & Gas, LLC, an oil and gas production and
development company located in Dallas, Texas. The
S-27
investment was in the form of senior secured notes, as well as a
net profits interest. The investment was funded on July 3,
2007.
On June 29, 2007, Prospect Capital closed on a transaction
that provided $25,000 debt financing to Regional Management
Corp, a consumer finance installment loan company located in
Greenville, South Carolina. The investment was in the form
of subordinated secured notes. The investment was funded on
July 12, 2007.
The following is a
quarter-by-quarter
summary of our investment activity since inception.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter-End
|
|
Acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
Dispositions(2)
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
130,345
|
|
|
$
|
9,857
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
19,701
|
|
|
|
7,731
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
62,679
|
|
|
|
17,796
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
24,677
|
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
42,783
|
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
15,732
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
25,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
17,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
7,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
23,771
|
|
|
|
32,083
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
30,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes new deals, additional fundings, refinancings and
payment-in-kind (PIK) interest |
|
(2) |
|
Includes scheduled principal payments, prepayments and
refinancings |
We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in
the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the
ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed
to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated
investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser
degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of
5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another
person.
As of June 30, 2007, we held a controlling interest in
Advantage, GSHI, Genesis, NRG, R-V, Whymore and WECO. As of
June 30, 2007, we held an affiliated interest in
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC and Iron Horse Coiled Tubing,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
$
|
139,292
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
49,585
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
14,625
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
|
|
|
174,305
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
%
|
|
|
59,055
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
369,982
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal prices have remained soft in Central Appalachia due to mild
weather, rail delays and utility inventory builds. Accordingly,
marginal spot prices for coal have fallen, at times, below
operating costs for many of the coal producers in that region,
including Whymore, Genesis and Unity. However, Whymore and
Genesis are selling coal under a utility contract at above
current spot market prices. These developments have continued
the risks associated with these investments and the risks of
loss of capital. However, cost cutting and revenue enhancing
efforts have intensified, which, together with recent warmer
weather and market production cuts, may improve the pricing
situation. We are looking at opportunities to take advantage of
the current depressed pricing environment through acquisitions
at favorable prices.
S-28
With respect to Unity, discussions have been underway between
Prospect Capital, the second lien holder, the senior lender
Texas Capital Banc Shares, Inc. (Texas Capital),
whose exposure has been reduced to $1,350, and Unity regarding
liquidating the last remaining saleable property in the
collateral package which consists of land, coal inventory, and
the refuse area. According to Unity, the sale could yield up to
$195. Prospect Capital believes that Unity principals would then
have to pay off the remaining debt to Texas Capital, making
Prospect Capital the senior most secured lender.
As of the date of this report, loans we have made to ESA and
Advantage are under enhanced scrutiny by our senior management
team due to existing or potential payment
and/or
covenant defaults under the contracts governing these
investments. ESA recently defaulted under our contract governing
our investment in ESA, prompting us to commence foreclosure
actions with respect to certain ESA assets in respect of which
we have a priority lien. In response to our actions, ESA filed
voluntarily for reorganization under the bankruptcy code. We
have a senior-secured, first-lien debt position with collateral
in the form of receivables, real estate, other assets, personal
guaranties and the stock of ESAs subsidiary company, The
Healing Staff. Our loan to ESA represents approximately 3.7% of
our current asset base. At its August 22, 2007 meeting, our
Board of Directors reduced the fair value of our investment in
ESA as of June 30, 2007 from $13,800 to $5,000, negatively
impacting our NAV per share by $0.44.
Advantage provides construction services to the gas industry,
primarily in Alberta, which has experienced a significant
slowdown in gas related construction activity. At March 31,
2007, our investment in Advantage was carried at approximately
$17,100. We have a senior secured, first-lien debt position with
collateral consisting of substantially all of Advantages
assets. Advantage has experienced a business slowdown and
liquidity problems, and the Investment Adviser believes
Advantage could continue to experience payment and covenant
defaults. In addition, we may be required to provide additional
capital to Advantage to permit it to continue to operate until
its liquidity improves and its business prospects are realized.
Our investment in Advantage represents approximately 4.6% of our
current asset base. At its August 22, 2007 meeting
referenced above, our Board of Directors reduced the fair value
of our investment in Advantage as of June 30, 2007 from
$17,100 to $9,900, negatively impacting our NAV per share by
$0.36.
Investment
Income
We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt
securities that we own, dividend income on any common or
preferred stock that we own, and amortized loan origination fees
on the structuring of new deals. Our investments, if in the form
of debt securities, will typically have a term of one to ten
years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the
extent achievable, we will seek to collateralize our investments
by obtaining security interests in our portfolio companies
assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity
interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or
in-kind dividends on a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis.
In addition, we may generate revenue in other forms including
prepayment penalties and possibly consulting fees. Any such fees
generated in connection with our investments are recognized as
earned.
Investment income, which consists of interest income, including
accretion of loan origination fees and prepayment penalty fees,
dividend income and other income, including net profits
interest, overriding royalties interest and structuring fees,
was $40,681, $16,869 and $8,093 for the years ended
June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005,
respectively.
Operating
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory
fees (base and incentive fees), credit facility costs, legal and
professional fees and other operating and overhead-related
expenses. These expenses include our allocable portion of
overhead under the Administration Agreement with Prospect
Administration under which Prospect Administration provides
administrative services and facilities for Prospect Capital. Our
investment advisory fees compensate our Investment Adviser for
its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and
monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses
of our operations and transactions in accordance with our
Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration.
S-29
Operating expenses were $17,550, $8,311 and $5,682 for the years
ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005, respectively. These expenses consisted of investment
advisory and administrative services fees, credit facility
costs, professional fees, insurance expenses, directors
fees and other general and administrative expenses. The base
investment advisory fees were $5,445, $2,082 and $1,808 for the
years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and
June 30, 2005, respectively. $5,781, $1,786 and $0 income
incentive fees were earned for the years ended June 30,
2007, June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively.
No capital gains incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to
the Investment Advisory Agreement.
During the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006
and June 30, 2005, the Company incurred $1,903, $642 and
$0, respectively of expenses related to its credit facilities.
The table below describes the components of the credit facility
costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment fees
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,903
|
|
|
$
|
642
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Investment Income, Net Realized Gains, Net Unrealized
Appreciation and Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from
Operations
Prospect Capitals net investment income was $23,131,
$8,558 and $2,411 for the years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Net
investment income represents the difference between investment
income and operating expenses and is directly impacted by the
items described above. Net realized gains (losses) were $1,949,
$303 and ($2) for the years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Net
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) was ($8,352), $4,035 and
$6,342 for the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30,
2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Net increase in net
assets resulting from operations represents the sum of the
returns generated from net investment income, realized gains
(losses) and the change in unrealized appreciation
(depreciation).
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash flows used in operating activities totaled ($143,890),
($29,919) and ($84,729) for the years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively.
Financing activities provided cash flows of $143,890, $20,332
and $94,315 for the years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively.
Dividends paid and declared were $21,634, $7,663 and $2,646 for
the years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and
June 30, 2005, respectively.
Our primary use of funds will be investments in portfolio
companies and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
In the future, we may continue to fund a portion of our
investments through borrowings from banks, issuances of senior
securities or secondary offerings. We may also securitize a
portion of our investments in mezzanine or senior secured loans
or other assets. Our objective is to put in place such
borrowings in order to expand our portfolio. At June 30,
2007, we had a $200 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility on which no amounts were outstanding. Since
June 30, 2007 we have borrowed approximately
$70 million on this credit facility. On September 6,
2007, our Registration Statement on
Form N-2
was declared effective by the SEC. Under the Registration
Statement, we may issue up to $500,000 of our equity securities
over the next three years.
S-30
Borrowings
The Company had $0 and $28,500 in borrowings at June 30,
2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. The following table
shows the facility amounts and outstanding borrowings at
June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,500
|
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2007, we did not have any off-balance sheet
liabilities or other contractual obligations that are reasonably
likely to have a current or future material effect on our
financial condition, other than the investment advisory and
management agreement and the administration agreement.
Report of
Management on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for
performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2007 based upon criteria in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on our assessment, management
determined that the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2007 based
on the criteria on Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by COSO. There were no material changes to the
Companys internal controls over financial reporting during
the year ended June 30, 2007.
BDO Seidman, LLP, the independent registered public accounting
firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included
in this report, has also audited the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as stated in their
report included herein.
S-31
The following is a listing of our portfolio companies, except
for Charlevoix, in which we own a net profits interest, at
June 30, 2007. Values are as of June 30, 2007.
The portfolio companies are presented in three categories:
companies more than 25% owned are portfolio
companies in which we directly or indirectly own more than 25%
of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and, therefore, are presumed to be controlled by us under the
1940 Act; companies owned 5% to 25% are portfolio
companies where we directly or indirectly own 5% to 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and/or hold
one or more seats on the portfolio companys Board of
Directors and, therefore, are deemed to be an affiliated person
under the 1940 Act; companies less than 5% owned are
portfolio companies where we directly or indirectly own less
than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company and where we have no other affiliations with such
portfolio company. As of June 30, 2007, we owned 25% of the
fully diluted common equity of Advantage, we owned 100% of the
fully diluted common equity of GSHI, 63% of Genesis, 51% of the
fully diluted common equity of WECO and certain of its
affiliates, 88.9% of the fully diluted common equity of NRG,
72.66% of the fully diluted equity of
R-V and 49%
of the fully diluted common equity of Whymore (as well as 100%
of two of Whymores affiliates C&A
Construction, Inc. and E&L Construction, Inc.). We make
available significant managerial assistance to our portfolio
companies. We generally request and may receive rights to
observe the meetings of our portfolio companies Boards of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
all Loans
|
|
Name of Portfolio Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd.
|
|
Construction Services
(Alberta, Canada)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common stock
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 15.00% due 5/30/09
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Gas gathering and processing (Texas)
|
|
Subordinated secured debt and common equity
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets, subject to
first priority lien of senior lender, Citibank Texas, N.A.
|
|
Common shares; Subordinated secured note, 18.00% due 12/22/2011
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Genesis Coal Corp.
|
|
Mining and Coal production (Kentucky)
|
|
Senior Secured debt, warrants, Preferred Shares and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets including
equipment, although Prospects lien on certain equipment is
second to S600K loan by First Tennessee Bank
|
|
Common shares; warrants, Preferred Stock; senior secured note,
16.40% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 16.5% due 8/31/2013
Preferred shares, convertible, Series A;
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing (Pennsylvania)
|
|
Senior secured debt, common equity and warrants
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Warrants, common shares, expiring 6/30/2017;
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 5/30/2009
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
all Loans
|
|
Name of Portfolio Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company
|
|
Mining and coal production (Kentucky)
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 16.31% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.
|
|
Biomass power (Maine)
|
|
Senior secured debt convertible preferred stock and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Preferred stock, convertible, Series A; Senior
secured note, 12.50% due 12/31/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
|
|
Construction services (West Virginia)
|
|
Senior secured debt, preferred equity with penny warrants
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred shares; Warrants, preferred shares, expiring
2/14/2016; Warrants, common shares, expiring 2/14/2016;
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3.00% PIK due 2/14/2011
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Production services (Alberta, Canada)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common stock
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note, 15.00% due 4/19/09
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Production services (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt with warrants for common and preferred
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 7/19/2012; Warrants, preferred
shares, expiring 7/19/2012;
Senior secured note. 13.00% due 6/15/2009
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Metal services (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 14.00% due 03/31/2010
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Biofuels/Ethanol (Illinois)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.36% due 3/31/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Conquest Cherokee LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Overriding royalty interest, 5-10%; Senior secured note, 13.00%
due 5/5/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
S-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
all Loans
|
|
Name of Portfolio Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ESA Environmental Specialist, Inc.
|
|
Contracting (North Carolina)
|
|
Senior secured debt and warrants
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 4/11/2017; Senior secured
note, 14.00% due 4/11/2011; Senior secured note, 14.00% due
6/7/2008
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
|
Oil and Gas Production (Texas)
|
|
Common shares
|
|
None
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M Oil & Gas, LLC
|
|
Oil and Gas Production (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due 6/30/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
Jettco Marine Services LLC
|
|
Shipping (Louisiana)
|
|
Subordinated secured debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Subordinated secured note 12.00% plus 4.00% PIK due 12/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Ken-Tex Energy Corp.
|
|
Oil and Gas Production (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due 6/30/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt and warrants
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010, through 9/30/2011
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Management Corp.
|
|
Financial Services (South Carolina)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note 12.00% plus 2.00% PIK due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Ohio)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured term note, 12.33% due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
TLOGH, L.P.
|
|
Oil and Gas Production (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due 10/23/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
|
|
Coal mining (Virginia)
|
|
Secured subordinated debt
|
|
Second priority lien on substantially all assets, subject to
first priority lien of senior lender, PlainsCapital Bank
|
|
Subordinated secured note, due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
S-34
Subject to the terms and conditions contained in an underwriting
agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the underwriters
named below, for whom Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. is
acting as representative, have severally agreed to purchase, and
we have agreed to sell to them, severally, the number of shares
of common stock indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
D.A. Davidson & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the
shares of common stock offered hereby are subject to the
approval of certain legal matters by their counsel, delivery of
customary closing certificates and to certain other conditions.
The underwriters are severally obligated to purchase all shares
of common stock offered hereby (other than those covered by the
underwriters over-allotment option described below) if any
such shares are taken. If an underwriter defaults, the
underwriting agreement provides that the purchase commitments of
the non-defaulting underwriters may be increased. In the event
that the purchase commitments of the defaulting underwriters
representing more than 10% of the total numbers of shares
offered by this prospectus supplement, the underwriting
agreement may be terminated.
The underwriters initially propose to offer the shares directly
to the public at the public offering price set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at a price
that represents a concession not in excess of
$ per share below the public
offering price. Any underwriter may allow, and such dealers may
re-allow, a concession not in excess of
$ per share to other
underwriters or to certain dealers. After the initial offering
of the shares, the offering price and other selling terms may
from time to time be varied by the representative.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to
an aggregate of 562,500 additional shares of common stock
at the public offering price set forth on the cover page hereof,
less underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriters
may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering
over-allotments, if any, made in connection with the offering of
the shares of common stock offered hereby. To the extent such
option is exercised, each underwriter will become obligated,
subject to certain conditions, to purchase approximately the
same percentage of such additional shares of common stock as the
number set forth next to such underwriters name in the
preceding table bears to the total number of shares set forth
next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.
We and our executive officers and directors have agreed, subject
to certain exceptions, not to issue, sell, offer to sell,
contract or agree to sell, hypothecate, pledge, transfer, grant
any option to purchase, establish an open put equivalent
position or otherwise dispose of or agree to dispose of directly
or indirectly, any shares of our common stock, or any securities
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for any shares
of our common stock or any right to acquire shares of our common
stock, for a period of 45 days from the date of this
prospectus, subject to certain exceptions. The representative,
at any time and without notice, may release all or any portion
of the common stock subject to the foregoing
lock-up
agreement.
The 45 day
lock-up
period described in the preceding paragraph will automatically
be extended if (1) during the last 17 days of the
45-day
lock-up
period, we issue an earnings release or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs, or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
45-day
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results or
become aware that material news or a material event will occur
during
S-35
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
45-day
lock-up
period. Such period will continue until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event, as
applicable, unless the representative waives, in writing, such
extension.
The following table provides information regarding the per share
and total underwriting discounts and commissions that we are to
pay to the underwriters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We will pay all expenses incident to the offering and sale of
shares of our common stock by us and the selling stockholder in
this offering, other than underwriting discounts and commissions
and legal fees and expenses of the selling stockholder. We
estimate that the total expenses of the offering, excluding the
underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately
$ .
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933 (the Securities Act).
Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol PSEC.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
web sites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering.
The representative may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for the sale to their
online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us
or by the underwriters that would permit a public offering of
the shares of common stock included in this offering in any
jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The
shares of common stock included in this offering may not be
offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus
supplement or any other offering material or advertisements in
connection with the offer and sales of any shares of common
stock be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except
under circumstances that will result in compliance with the
applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons
who receive this prospectus supplement are advised to inform
themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to
this offering of shares of our common stock and the distribution
of this prospectus. This prospectus supplement is not an offer
to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any shares of our
common stock included in this offering in any jurisdiction where
that would not be permitted or legal.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell shares of our common stock in the open market. These
transactions may include over-allotment, syndicate covering
transactions and stabilizing transactions. An over-allotment
involves syndicate sales of shares in excess of the number of
shares to be purchased by the underwriters in the offering,
which creates a syndicate short position. Syndicate covering
transactions involve purchases of shares in the open market
after the distribution has been completed in order to cover
syndicate short positions.
Stabilizing transactions consist of some bids or purchases of
shares of our common stock made for the purpose of preventing or
slowing a decline in the market price of the shares while the
offering is in progress.
In addition, the underwriters may impose penalty bids, under
which they may reclaim the selling concession from a syndicate
member when the shares of our common stock originally sold by
that syndicate member are purchased in a stabilizing transaction
or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short
positions.
In connection with this transaction, certain of the underwriters
(and selling group members) may engage in passive market making
transactions in our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market,
prior to the pricing and completion of this offering. Passive
market making is permitted by SEC Regulation M and consists
of displaying bids on the Nasdaq Global Market no higher than
the bid prices of independent market makers and making purchases
at prices no higher than these independent bids and effected in
response to order flow. Net
S-36
purchases by a passive market maker on each day are limited to a
specified percentage of the passive market makers average
daily trading volume in the common stock during a specified
period and must be discontinued when such limit is reached.
Passive market making may cause the price of the common stock to
be higher than the price that otherwise would exist in the open
market in the absence of such transactions.
Similar to other purchase transactions, these activities may
have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of
the common stock or preventing or slowing a decline in the
market price of the common stock. As a result, the price of the
common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise
exist in the open market. Except for the sale of shares of our
common stock in this offering, the underwriters may carry out
these transactions on the Nasdaq National Market, in the
over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Neither we nor the underwriters make any representation or
prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that
the transactions described above may have on the price of the
shares. In addition, neither we nor the underwriters make any
representation that the underwriters will engage in these
transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will
not be discontinued without notice.
The underwriters
and/or their
affiliates from time to time provide and may in the future
provide investment banking, commercial banking and financial
advisory services to us, for which they have received and may
receive customary compensation.
The representative of the underwriters have advised us that the
underwriters do not intend to confirm sales to any account over
which they exercise discretionary authority.
This offering is being conducted in accordance with
Rule 2810 of the Conduct Rules of the NASD.
The addresses of the underwriters are: Morgan Keegan &
Company, Inc., 50 N. Front Street, 19th Floor,
Memphis, TN 38103; RBC Capital Markets Corporation, One Liberty
Plaza, New York, NY 10006; Oppenheimer &
Co. Inc., 125 Broad Street,
16th
Floor, New York, NY 10004; BB&T Capital Markets, a division
of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc., 909 East Main Street,
Richmond, VA 23219; D.A. Davidson & Co.,
Z Centerpointe, Suite 400, Lake Oswego, OR 97035;
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, 1801 Market Street, Philadelphia,
PA 19103.
S-37
Certain legal matters regarding the common stock offered hereby
will be passed upon for Prospect Capital by Clifford Chance US
LLP, New York, New York, and Venable LLP as special Maryland
counsel. The validity of the shares of common stock offered
hereby will be passed upon for the underwriters by Bass,
Berry & Sims PLC, Memphis, Tennessee.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO Seidman LLP is the independent registered public accounting
firm for Prospect Capital.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our common stock offered by this
prospectus supplement. The registration statement contains
additional information about us and the common stock being
registered by this prospectus supplement. We file with or submit
to the SEC annual, quarterly and current periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information meeting the informational
requirements of the Exchange Act. This information and the
information specifically regarding how we voted proxies relating
to portfolio securities for the period ended June 30, 2007,
are available free of charge by contacting us at 10 East
40th Street, 44th floor, New York, NY 10016 or by
telephone at toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C.
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
E-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
No dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized
to give any information or to make any representation other than
those contained in this prospectus supplement and, if given or
made, such information or representations must not be relied
upon as having been authorized by us or the underwriters. This
prospectus supplement does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any
jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation is not
authorized or in which the person making such offer or
solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom
it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Neither the
delivery of this prospectus supplement nor any sale made
hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication
that there has been no change in our affairs or that information
contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to the
date hereof.
S-38
INDEX
TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Prospect Capital Corporation
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
assets and liabilities of Prospect Capital Corporation,
including the consolidated schedule of investments as of
June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended June 30,
2007, and the financial highlights for each of the periods
presented. These financial statements and financial highlights
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit
also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and
financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Prospect Capital
Corporation at June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended June 30, 2007, and the financial
highlights for each of the periods presented in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Prospect Capital Corporations internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, based
on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report
dated September 27, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
BDO
Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
September 27, 2007
F-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Prospect Capital Corporation
New York, New York
We have audited Prospect Capital Corporations internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, based
on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
Prospect Capital Corporations management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included on
page S-31
of this prospectus supplement Report of Management on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Prospect Capital Corporation maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of Prospect
Capital Corporation as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net
assets, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended June 30, 2007 and our report dated,
September 27, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
New York, New York
September 27, 2007
F-3
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except shares and per share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value (cost of $326,197 and $123,593,
respectively, Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost of $124,664 and $39,759, respectively)
|
|
$
|
139,292
|
|
|
$
|
49,585
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost of $14,821 and $25,329, respectively)
|
|
|
14,625
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost of $186,712 and
$58,505, respectively)
|
|
|
174,305
|
|
|
|
59,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
|
328,222
|
|
|
|
133,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
Receivables for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Loan principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Securities sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Structuring fees
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from Prospect Administration (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Due from Prospect Management (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
376,502
|
|
|
|
138,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Prospect Administration (Note 5)
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Prospect Management (Note 5)
|
|
|
4,508
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
76,454
|
|
|
|
30,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share (100,000,000 and
100,000,000 common shares authorized, respectively; 19,949,065
and 7,069,873 issued and outstanding, respectively)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
299,845
|
|
|
|
97,266
|
|
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
|
|
|
(4,092
|
)
|
|
|
319
|
|
Accumulated realized gains on investments
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
10,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except shares and per share data)
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $178,
$ and $ , respectively)
|
|
$
|
13,275
|
|
|
$
|
4,838
|
|
|
$
|
2,704
|
|
Affiliate investments (Net of foreign withholding tax of $237,
$ and $ , respectively)
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
30,084
|
|
|
|
13,268
|
|
|
|
4,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend income
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
4,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
|
40,681
|
|
|
|
16,869
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
5,781
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment advisory fees
|
|
|
11,226
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and credit facility costs
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer and Sub-administration fees
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
17,550
|
|
|
|
8,311
|
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
23,131
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share (see Note 6)
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Structuring Fee Income of $2,574, Net Profits Interests
of $26, Deal Deposit Income of $688, Prepayment Penalty on
closing Net Profits Interest of $961 and Overriding Royalty
Interests of $195. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except share data)
|
|
|
Increase in Net Assets from Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
23,131
|
|
|
$
|
8,558
|
|
|
$
|
2,411
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
|
|
16,728
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to Shareholders:
|
|
|
(27,542
|
)
|
|
|
(7,904
|
)
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from shares sold
|
|
|
197,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
Less offering costs of public share offerings
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Reinvestment of dividends
|
|
|
5,908
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Capital Share
Transactions
|
|
|
202,592
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
96,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Net Assets:
|
|
|
191,778
|
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
|
|
103,066
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at End of Period
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold
|
|
|
12,526,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,055,000
|
|
Shares issued through reinvestment of dividends
|
|
|
352,542
|
|
|
|
14,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in capital share activity
|
|
|
12,879,192
|
|
|
|
14,773
|
|
|
|
7,055,000
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of period
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding at End of Period
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting
from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
investments
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
|
|
(4,035
|
)
|
|
|
(6,342
|
)
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
(1,949
|
)
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Accretion of original issue discount on investments
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(167,255
|
)
|
|
|
(83,625
|
)
|
|
|
(80,699
|
)
|
Sales of investments
|
|
|
38,407
|
|
|
|
9,954
|
|
|
|
32,083
|
|
Net investments in money market funds
|
|
|
(40,152
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1,588
|
)
|
Net investments in other short-term instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,228
|
|
|
|
(37,250
|
)
|
Increase in interest receivable
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,446
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Increase in dividends receivable
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in loan principal receivable
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivable for securities sold
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other receivable
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in due from Gas Solutions Holdings,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in due from Prospect Administration
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in due from Prospect Management
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in deferred offering costs
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in due to Prospect Administration
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Increase in due to Prospect Management
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Increase in other current liabilities
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
|
|
|
(143,890
|
)
|
|
|
(29,919
|
)
|
|
|
(84,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (payments) under credit facility
|
|
|
(28,500
|
)
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
197,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
Increase in deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Offering costs from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(21,634
|
)
|
|
|
(7,663
|
)
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities
|
|
|
143,890
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
|
|
94,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,587
|
)
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, End of Period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid For Interest
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
$
|
5,908
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group Ltd.(23)
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, Class A(3)
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 5/30/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,321
|
|
|
|
16,930
|
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,150
|
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(4)
|
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,878
|
|
|
|
26,100
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note, 18.00% due 12/22/2011(23)
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,278
|
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Corp.
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, preferred shares, expiring 2/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.40%(5) due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,533
|
|
|
|
14,408
|
|
|
|
11,423
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,464
|
|
|
|
11,425
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
11,785
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.50%(6) due 8/31/2013(23)
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,080
|
|
|
|
10,080
|
|
|
|
10,080
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,395
|
|
|
|
21,865
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-V Industries, Inc.
|
|
Pennsylvania/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
545,107
|
|
|
|
4,985
|
|
|
|
4,985
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 6/30/2017
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 6/30/2017(23)
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,526
|
|
|
$
|
12,844
|
|
|
$
|
12,844
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,511
|
|
|
|
19,511
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company, Inc.(7)
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.42%(8) due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
7,063
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,133
|
|
|
|
7,064
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.(9)
|
|
Maine/Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.50% due 12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,774
|
|
|
|
26,596
|
|
|
|
25,046
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,733
|
|
|
|
25,047
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,664
|
|
|
|
139,292
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(10)(23)
|
|
West Virginia/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, expiring 2/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus 3.00% PIK due 1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,621
|
|
|
|
5,425
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.(23)
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Production
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 4/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
8,932
|
|
|
|
8,932
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,821
|
|
|
$
|
14,625
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.(11)(23)
|
|
Texas/
Production
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
596,251
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
F-9
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Series A redeemable preferred shares, expiring
7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%
due 7/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,301
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,670
|
|
|
|
13,670
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC(23)
|
|
Texas/Metal
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 3/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%(12)
due 3/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5,249
|
|
|
|
5,249
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC(23)
|
|
Illinois/
Biofuels/
Ethanol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.35%(13)
due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC(14)(23)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%(15)
due 5/5/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESA Environmental Specialist, Inc.(23)
|
|
North Carolina/
Contracting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 4/11/2017
|
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%(16)
due 4/11/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%(16)
due 6/7/2008
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,575
|
|
|
$
|
1,575
|
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,776
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution Petroleum Corp.(17)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
139,926
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H&M Oil & Gas, LLC(18)(23)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%(19)
due 6/30/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jettco Marine Services LLC(18)(23)
|
|
Louisiana/
Shipping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 12.00%(20),
plus 4.0% PIK due 12/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,671
|
|
|
|
6,553
|
|
|
|
6,553
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ken-Tex Energy Corp.(14)(23)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due 6/4/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 5/4/2010
to 6/30/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,206,859
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Management Corp.(23)
|
|
South Carolina/
Financial
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 12.00%,
plus 2.0% PIK due 6/29/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy, LLC(21)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated revolving credit facility, 12.43%(22)
due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
28,942
|
|
|
|
28,942
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLOGH, L.P.(21)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%,
Due 10/23/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,291
|
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
|
|
Virginia/ Mining
and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 15.00%, plus 15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
|
$
|
3,871
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,712
|
|
|
|
174,305
|
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,197
|
|
|
|
328,222
|
|
|
|
109.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Institutional Money Market
Funds Government Portfolio (Class I)
|
|
|
|
|
38,227,118
|
|
|
|
38,227
|
|
|
|
38,227
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
First American Funds, Inc. Prime Obligations Fund
(Class A)(23)
|
|
|
|
|
289,000
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
First American Funds, Inc. Prime Obligations Fund
(Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
3,243,731
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
F-11
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
367,957
|
|
|
$
|
369,982
|
|
|
|
123.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Capital has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the Board
of Directors of Prospect Capital (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Prospect Capital has the right to purchase 184 shares of
Class A common shares at a purchase price of $1.00 per
share in the event of a default under the credit agreement. |
|
(4) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned investment of
Prospect Capital. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
6-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 16.5% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Whymore investment.
The senior secured debt is with C&A Construction, Inc.
(C&A), which owns the equipment. E&L
Construction, Inc. (E&L) leases the equipment
from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator
with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives
revenues and pays all operating expenses. Whymore Coal Company,
Inc. (Whymore) applies for and holds permits on
behalf of E&L. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under
the C&A credit agreement with Prospect Capital. Prospect
Capital owns 10,000 shares of common stock of C&A
(100% ownership), 10,000 shares of common stock of E&L
(100% ownership), and 4,900 shares of common stock of
Whymore (49% ownership). Prospect Capital owns 4,285
Series A convertible preferred shares in each of C&A,
E&L and Whymore. Additionally, Prospect Capital retains an
option to purchase the remaining 51% of Whymore. As of
June 30, 2007, the Board of Directors of Prospect Capital
assessed a fair value of $1 for all of these equity positions. |
|
(8) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
5-Year US
Treasury Note plus 11.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30,
2007. |
|
(9) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Worcester Energy
Company Inc. investment. Prospect Capital owns 100 shares
of common stock in Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc.
(WEHI) representing 100%. WEHI, in turn, owns 51
membership certificates in Biochips LLC, which represents 51%
ownership. |
|
|
|
Prospect Capital also owns 282 shares of common stock in
Worcester Energy Co., Inc. (WECO), which represents
51% ownership. Prospect Capital also owns 1,665 shares of
common stock in Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.
(WEPI), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect
Capital also owns 1,000 of series A convertible preferred
shares in WEPI. WECO, WEPI and Biochips LLC are joint borrowers
on the term note issued by Prospect Capital. WEPI owns the
equipment and operates the biomass generation facility. Biochips
LLC currently has no material operations. As of June 30,
2007, the Board of Directors of Prospect Capital assessed a fair
value of $1 for all of these equity positions. |
|
(10) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy
Holdings (Appalachian Energy) investment. Prospect
Capital owns 100 shares of Class A common stock of AEH
Investment Corp. (AEH), 200 shares of
Series A preferred stock of AEH and 6,065 warrants,
expiring 2/14/2016 to purchase Class A common stock. The
senior secured note is with C & S Operating LLC and
East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC. AEH owns Appalachian Energy. |
F-12
Prospect
Capital Corporation
Consolidated
Schedule of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
(11) |
|
The Portfolio Investment does business as Cougar Pressure
Control. |
|
(12) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 14.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(13) |
|
Interest rate is LIBOR plus 10.0%; rate reflected is as of
June 30, 2007. |
|
(14) |
|
Prospect Capital has an overriding royalty interest and net
profits interest in the Portfolio Investment. |
|
(15) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(16) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 14.0% or
1-Month
LIBOR plus 8.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(17) |
|
Formerly known as Natural Gas Systems, Inc. |
|
(18) |
|
Prospect Capital has a net profits interest in the Portfolio
Investment. |
|
(19) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(20) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
3-Month
LIBOR plus 6.11%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(21) |
|
Prospect Capital has an overriding royalty interest in Portfolio
Investment. |
|
(22) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(23) |
|
Security or portion thereof, is held as collateral for the
credit facility with Rabobank Nederland (see Note 9). At
June 30, 2007, the value of these investments was $195,966
which represents 65.3% of net assets. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-13
Prospect
Energy Corporation
June 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,875
|
|
|
$
|
14,700
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note, 18.00% due 12/22/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,275
|
|
|
|
33,100
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.(4)
|
|
Maine/Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.50% due 12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,338
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,485
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,759
|
|
|
|
49,585
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to 24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group Ltd.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, Class A
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due 5/30/2009(5)
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
15,926
|
|
|
|
15,926
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(6)
|
|
West Virginia/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, expiring 2/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3.00% PIK due 1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Production
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00%
due 4/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
Prospect
Energy Corporation
Schedule
of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
Total Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments (less than 5.00% of
voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Texas/
Production
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
596,251
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Warrants, Series A redeemable preferred shares, expiring
7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%
due 7/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,099
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Illinois/
Biofuels/
Ethanol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.50%(7)
due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC
|
|
Michigan/
Natural Gas
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 12.50%
due 3/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.24%(8)
due 5/5/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Corp.
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, preferred shares, expiring 2/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.89%(9)
due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010 through 6/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
842,527
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
Prospect
Energy Corporation
Schedule
of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, registered
|
|
|
|
|
732,528
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Common shares, unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
139,926
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC(10)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.32%
due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,330
|
|
|
|
13,139
|
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,609
|
|
|
|
14,608
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
|
|
Virginia/ Mining
and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 15.00%, 15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company, Inc.(11)
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.59%(12)
due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,505
|
|
|
|
59,055
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,593
|
|
|
|
133,969
|
|
|
|
123.7
|
%
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Funds, Inc. Prime Obligations Fund
(Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
1,607,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,201
|
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
125.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Capital has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the Board
of Directors of Prospect Capital (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is a wholly owned investment of
Prospect Capital. |
|
(4) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Worcester investment.
Prospect Capital owns 100 shares of common stock in
Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. (WEHI) representing
100%. WEHI, in turn, owns 51 membership certificates in Biochips
LLC, which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Capital also owns
282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc.
(WECO), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect
Capital also owns 1,665 shares of common stock in Worcester
Energy Partners, Inc. (WEPI), |
F-16
Prospect
Energy Corporation
Schedule
of Investments (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Capital also owns 1,000
of series A convertible preferred shares in WEPI. WECO,
WEPI and Biochips LLC are joint borrowers on the term note
issued by Prospect Capital. WEPI owns the equipment and operates
the biomass generation facility. Biochips LLC currently has no
material operations. |
|
(5) |
|
Prospect Capital has the right to purchase 184 shares of
Class A common shares at a purchase price of $1.00 per
share in the event of a default under the credit agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy
Holdings (Appalachian Energy) investment. Prospect
Capital owns 100 shares of Class A common stock of AEH
Investment Corp. (AEH), 200 shares of
Series A preferred stock of AEH and 6,065 warrants,
expiring 2/14/2016 to purchase Class A common stock. The
senior secured note is with C & S Operating LLC and
East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC. AEH owns Appalachian Energy. |
|
(7) |
|
Interest rate is LIBOR plus 10.0%; rate reflected is as of
June 30, 2006. |
|
(8) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
6-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. |
|
(10) |
|
Prospect Capital owns 100 shares of common stock in PEH
Stryker, Inc. (PEH Stryker), which represents 100%.
PEH Stryker holds 350 non-voting Class A preferred units in
Stryker Energy II, LLC (Stryker II), which
represents a 35% interest. Stryker II is the borrower on
the term note issued by Prospect Capital. Prospect Capital also
holds one warrant expiring 4/18/2025 for anti-dilution purposes. |
|
(11) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Whymore investment.
The senior secured debt is with C&A Construction, Inc.
(C&A), which owns the equipment. E&L
Construction, Inc. (E&L) leases the equipment
from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator
with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives
revenues and pays all operating expenses. Whymore Coal Company,
Inc. (Whymore) applies for and holds permits on
behalf of E&L. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under
the C&A credit agreement with Prospect Capital. Prospect
Capital owns 4,285 Series A convertible preferred shares in
each of C&A, E&L and Whymore. |
|
(12) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
5-Year US
Treasury Note plus 11.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30,
2006. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-17
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2007
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
Prospect Capital Corporation (Prospect Capital or
the Company), formerly known as Prospect Energy
Corporation, a Maryland corporation, was organized on
April 13, 2004 and is a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940
Act). On July 27, 2004, the Company completed its
initial public offering (IPO) and sold
7,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per
share, less underwriting discounts and commissions totaling
$1.05 per share. Since the IPO, the Company has had an exercise
of an over-allotment option with respect to the IPO on
August 27, 2004, a public offering on August 10, 2006,
and subsequent exercise of an over-allotment option on
August 28, 2006. On December 13, 2006, the Company
priced a public offering of 6,000,000 shares of common
stock at $17.70 per share, raising $106,200 in gross proceeds as
well as an additional 810,000 shares of common stock at
$17.315 per share raising $14,025 in gross proceeds in the
exercise of an over-allotment option on January 11, 2007.
On May 15, 2007, the Company formed a wholly-owned
subsidiary, Prospect Capital Funding, LLC, a Delaware
corporation, for the purpose of holding certain of the
Companys portfolio of loan investments which are used as
collateral for its credit facility.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported
period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets,
creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any other
parameters used in determining these estimates could cause
actual results to differ.
The statements include portfolio investments at fair value of
$328,222 and $133,969 at June 30, 2007 and June 30,
2006, respectively. At June 30, 2007 and June 30,
2006, 109.4% and 123.7%, respectively, of the Companys net
assets represented portfolio investments whose fair values have
been determined by the Board of Directors in good faith in the
absence of readily available market values. Because of the
inherent uncertainty of valuation, the Board of Directors
determined values may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for the
investments, and the differences could be material.
Interim financial statements, which are not audited, are
prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial
information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on
Form 10-Q
and Article 6 or 10 of
Regulation S-X,
as appropriate.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Capital:
Investments:
a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
b) Valuation:
1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
2) Short-term investments that mature in 60 days or
less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at
amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized
cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date
of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to
maturity
F-18
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the difference between the principal amount due at maturity
and cost. Short-term securities that mature in more than
60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process
that is under the direction of our Board of Directors. The
factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in interest rates, the financial environment in which the
portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar
publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the
inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of
investments that do not have a readily available market value,
the fair value of these investments may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for such investments, and any such differences could be
material.
4) The Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) has recently issued a new pronouncement
addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Number 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). This statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157
becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and is not expected to have a material
effect on the financial statements. Therefore, its first
applicability to the Company will be on July 1, 2008.
c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium
and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income.
e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
f) Structuring fees and similar fees are recognized as
income as earned, usually when paid. Structuring fees, excess
deal deposits, net profits interests and overriding royalty
interest are included in other income.
g) Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or
interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when
there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be
collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is
placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on
non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to
principal depending upon managements judgment. Non-
accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due
principal and interest is paid and in managements
judgment, are likely to remain current. As of June 30,
2007, less than 0.1% of the Companys net assets are in
non-accrual status.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
Prospect Capital has elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company and intends to continue to comply with the
requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code), applicable to regulated investment companies.
We are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment
company taxable income
F-19
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and intend to distribute (or retain through a deemed
distribution) all of our investment company taxable income and
net capital gain to stockholders; therefore, we have made no
provision for income taxes. The character of income and gains
that we will distribute is determined in accordance with income
tax regulations that may differ from GAAP. Book and tax basis
differences relating to stockholder dividends and distributions
and other permanent book and tax differences are reclassified to
paid-in capital.
If the Company does not distribute (or is not deemed to have
distributed) at least 98% of its annual taxable income in the
year earned, the Company will generally be required to pay an
excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of the
Companys annual taxable income exceeds the distributions
from such taxable income for the year. To the extent that the
Company determines that its estimated current year annual
taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year
dividend distributions from such taxable income, the Company
accrues excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable income
as taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax
rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by
dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual
taxable income.
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 provides guidance
for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured,
presented, and disclosed in the financial statements.
FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in the course of preparing the
Companys tax returns to determine whether the tax
positions are more-likely-than-not of being
sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not
deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded
as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of
FIN 48 was applied to all open tax years as of the
effective date. The adoption of FIN No. 48 did not
have an effect on the net asset value, financial condition or
results of operations of the Company as there was no liability
for unrecognized tax benefits and no change to the beginning net
asset value of the Company. As of and during the period ended
June 30, 2007, the Company did not have a liability for any
unrecognized tax benefits. Managements determinations
regarding FIN 48 may be subject to review and adjustment at
a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to,
an on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and
interpretations thereof.
Dividends
and Distributions:
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend is approved by the Board of Directors each quarter and
is generally based upon managements estimate of our
earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Consolidation:
As an investment company, Prospect Capital only consolidates
subsidiaries that are also investment companies. At
June 30, 2007, the financial statements include the
accounts of Prospect Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Prospect Capital Funding, LLC. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Financing
Costs:
The Company records origination expenses related to its credit
facility as deferred financing costs. These expenses are
deferred and amortized as part of interest expense using the
straight-line method over the stated life of the facility.
The Company records registration expenses related to shelf
filings as prepaid assets. These expenses consist principally of
SEC registration, legal and accounting fees incurred through
June 30, 2007 that are
F-20
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related to the shelf filings that will be charged to capital
upon the receipt of the capital or charged to expense if not
completed. There were no such expenses at June 30, 2006.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements:
The Company follows FASB Interpretation Number 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. (FIN 45).
FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosure requirements of a
guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about
its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It
also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, for those guarantees that are covered by FIN 45,
the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing certain
guarantees. FIN 45 did not have a material effect on the
financial statements. Refer to Note 3 for further
discussion of guarantees and indemnification agreements.
Per
Share Information:
Basic earnings per common share are calculated using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period presented.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At June 30, 2007, 109.4% of our net assets or about
$328,222 was invested in 24 long-term portfolio investments
(including net profits interest in Charlevoix Energy Trading
LLC) and 13.9% of our net assets was invested in money
market funds. The remainder (23.3%) of our net assets
represented liabilities in excess of other assets. At
June 30, 2006, 123.7% of our net assets or about $133,969
was invested in 15 long-term portfolio investments and 1.59% of
our net assets was invested in money market funds. The remainder
(25.2%) of our net assets represented liabilities in excess of
other assets. Prospect Capital is a non-diversified company
within the meaning of the 1940 Act. We classify our investments
by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, control
investments are those where there is the ability or power to
exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies
of a company. Control is generally deemed to exist when a
company or individual owns more than 25% or more of the voting
securities of an investee company. Affiliated investments and
affiliated companies are defined by a lesser degree of influence
and are deemed to exist through ownership of 5% or more of the
outstanding voting securities of another person. The Company
owns a controlling interest in Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd.
(AOG), Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(GSHI), Genesis Coal Corp. (Genesis),
NRG Manufacturing, Inc. (NRG), R-V Industries, Inc.
(R-V), Whymore Coal Company (Whymore)
and Worcester Energy Company, Inc. (WECO). The
Company also owns an affiliated interest in Appalachian Energy
Holdings, LLC (AEH) and Iron Horse Coiled Tubing,
Inc. (Iron Horse). The Company has no other
controlled or affiliated investments.
GSHI has indemnified Prospect Capital against any legal action
arising from its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. Prospect
Capital has incurred approximately $1,797 in fees associated
with a legal action through June 30, 2007, and GSHI has
reimbursed Prospect Capital the entire amount. Of the $1,797
reimbursement, $178, $941 and $676 reflected as Dividend income,
Controlled entities on the accompanying consolidated statement
of operations for the years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively,
Debt placements and interests in non-voting equity securities
with an original cost basis of approximately $237,255 were
acquired during year ended June 30, 2007. Debt repayments
and sales of equity securities with an original cost basis of
approximately $36,459 were disposed during the year ended
June 30, 2007.
From time to time, the Company provides guarantees for portfolio
companies for payments to counterparties, usually as an
alternative to investing additional capital. Currently,
guarantees are outstanding
F-21
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
only for three portfolio companies categorized as Control
Investments, which are not deemed by management to be material
individually or in the aggregate.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Organizational
and Offering Expenses
|
A portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering on
July 27, 2004 and the subsequent exercise of the
over-allotment option on August 27, 2004 was used for
organizational and offering expenses of approximately $125 and
$1,393, respectively. Organizational expenses were expensed as
incurred. Offering expenses were charged against paid-in capital
in excess of par. All organizational and offering expenses were
borne by Prospect Capital.
A portion of the net proceeds of our August 13, 2006
secondary offering and the subsequent exercise of the
over-allotment option on August 28, 2006 was used for
offering expenses of approximately $594. A portion of the net
proceeds of our December 13, 2006 secondary offering and
the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option in
January 11, 2007 was used for offering expenses of
approximately $273. Offering expenses were charged against
paid-in capital in excess of par. All offering expenses were
borne by Prospect Capital.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Capital has entered into an investment advisory and
management agreement with Prospect Management (the
Investment Advisory Agreement) under which the
Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of
Prospect Capitals Board of Directors, manages the
day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory
services to, Prospect Capital. Under the terms of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, our Investment Adviser: (i) determines
the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the
changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such
changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the
structure of the investments we make (including performing due
diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); and
(iii) closes and monitors investments we make.
Prospect Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from Prospect Capital, consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of
2.00% on Prospect Capitals gross assets (including amounts
borrowed). For services rendered under the Investment Advisory
Agreement during the period commencing from the closing of
Prospect Capitals initial public offering through and
including the first six months of operations, the base
management fee was payable monthly in arrears. For services
currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the
base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base
management fee is calculated based on the average value of
Prospect Capitals gross assets at the end of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters (the closing of Prospect
Capitals initial public offering was treated as a quarter
end for these purposes) and appropriately adjusted for any share
issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
The Investment Adviser had previously voluntarily agreed to
waive 0.5% of the base management fee if in the future the
average amount of our gross assets for each of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters, appropriately adjusted for
any share issuances, repurchases or other transactions during
such quarters, exceeds $750,000,000, for that portion of the
average amount of our gross assets that exceeds $750,000,000.
The voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser for such
waiver for each fiscal quarter after December 31, 2007 has
been terminated by the Investment Adviser. Base management fees
for any partial month or quarter are appropriately pro rated.
The total base management fees earned by and paid to Prospect
Management during the years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 were $5,445, $2,082
and $1,808, respectively.
F-22
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income for the immediately preceding calendar
quarter. For this purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment
income means interest income, dividend income and any other
income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing
managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination,
structuring, diligence and consulting fees and other fees that
Prospect Capital receives from portfolio companies) accrued
during the calendar quarter, minus Prospect Capitals
operating expenses for the quarter (including the base
management fee, expenses payable under the Administration
Agreement described below, and any interest expense and
dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock,
but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net
investment income includes, in the case of investments with a
deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt
instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon
securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in
cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include
any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or
unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive
fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the
value of Prospect Capitals net assets at the end of the
immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
Previously, our Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed that
for each fiscal quarter from January 1, 2005 to
March 31, 2007, the quarterly hurdle rate was to be equal
to the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal
to the sum of 25.0% of the daily average of the quoted
treasury rate for each month in the immediately preceding
two quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means
the yield to maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond
equivalent basis) at the time of computation for Five Year
U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as compiled
and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical
Release H). These calculations were to be appropriately pro
rated for any period of less than three months and adjusted for
any share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter.
The voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the
hurdle rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005 (as discussed above) was terminated by the
Investment Adviser as of the June 30, 2007, quarter. The
investment adviser had also voluntarily agreed that, in the
event it is paid an incentive fee at a time when our common
stock is trading at a price below $15 per share for the
immediately preceding 30 days (as adjusted for stock
splits, recapitalizations and other transactions), it will cause
the amount of such incentive fee payment to be held in an escrow
account by an independent third party, subject to applicable
regulations. The Investment Adviser had further agreed that this
amount may not be drawn upon by the Investment Adviser or any
affiliate or any other third party until such time as the price
of our common stock achieves an average 30 day closing
price of at least $15 per share. The Investment Adviser also had
voluntarily agreed to cause 30% of any incentive fee that it is
paid and that is not otherwise held in escrow to be invested in
shares of our common stock through an independent trustee. Any
sales of such stock were to comply with any applicable six month
holding period under Section 16(b) of the Securities Act
and all other restrictions contained in any law or regulation,
to the fullest extent applicable to any such sale. These two
voluntary agreements by the Investment Adviser have been
terminated by the Investment Adviser for all incentive fees
after December 31, 2007.
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. Prospect
Capital pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which Prospect
Capitals pre-incentive fee net investment income does not
exceed the hurdle rate;
|
|
|
|
100.00% of Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income with respect to that portion of such
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
the hurdle rate but is less than 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate); and
|
F-23
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
20.00% of the amount of Prospect Capitals pre-incentive
fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 125.00% of the
quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized
assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle rate).
|
These calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of Prospect Capitals realized capital gains for the
calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such
year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital calculates the
aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital
losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as
applicable, with respect to each of the investments in its
portfolio. For this purpose, aggregate realized capital gains,
if any, equals the sum of the differences between the net sales
price of each investment, when sold, and the original cost of
such investment since inception. Aggregate realized capital
losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the net sales price
of each investment, when sold, is less than the original cost of
such investment since inception. Aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation equals the sum of the difference, if negative,
between the valuation of each investment as of the applicable
date and the original cost of such investment. At the end of the
applicable period, the amount of capital gains that serves as
the basis for Prospect Capitals calculation of the capital
gains incentive fee equals the aggregate realized capital gains
less aggregate realized capital losses and less aggregate
unrealized capital depreciation with respect to its portfolio of
investments. If this number is positive at the end of such
period, then the capital gains incentive fee for such period is
equal to 20.00% of such amount, less the aggregate amount of any
capital gains incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in
all prior periods.
$5,781, $1,786 and $0 income incentive fees were earned for the
years ended June 30, 2007, June 30, 2006 and
June 30, 2005, respectively. No capital gains incentive
fees were earned were earned for years ended June 30, 2007,
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005.
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Capital has also entered into an Administration
Agreement with Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of)
administrative services and facilities for Prospect Capital. For
providing these services, Prospect Capital reimburses Prospect
Administration for Prospect Capitals allocable portion of
overhead incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent
and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance
officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs.
Under this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with
office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and
record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect
Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of,
our required administrative services, which include, among other
things, being responsible for the financial records that we are
required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders
and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect
Administration assists us in determining and publishing our net
asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax
returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to us by others. Under the Administration Agreement,
Prospect Administration also provides on our behalf managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required
to provide such assistance. The Administration Agreement may be
terminated by either party without penalty upon
60 days written notice to the other party. Prospect
Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our Investment
Adviser.
F-24
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Capital for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administrations
services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as
administrator for Prospect Capital.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our Board
of Directors, has engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC
(Vastardis) to serve as the sub-administrator of
Prospect Capital to perform certain services required of
Prospect Administration. This engagement began in May 2005 and
ran on a month-to-month basis at the rate of $25 annually,
payable monthly. Under the sub-administration agreement,
Vastardis provides Prospect Capital with office facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at
such facilities. Vastardis also conducts relations with
custodians, depositories, transfer agents, dividend disbursing
agents, other stockholder servicing agents, accountants,
attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers, corporate
fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in any such
other capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable. Vastardis
provides reports to the Administrator and the Directors of its
performance of obligations and furnishes advice and
recommendations with respect to such other aspects of the
business and affairs of Prospect Capital as it shall determine
to be desirable. Under the revised and renewed
sub-administration agreement, Vastardis also provides the
service of William E. Vastardis as the Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) of the Fund. This service was formerly
provided at the rate of $225 annually, payable monthly. In May
2006, the engagement was revised and renewed as an asset-based
fee with a $400 annual minimum, payable monthly. Vastardis does
not provide any advice or recommendation relating to the
securities and other assets that Prospect Capital should
purchase, retain or sell or any other investment advisory
services to Prospect Capital. Vastardis is responsible for the
financial and other records that either Prospect Capital (or the
Administrator on behalf of Prospect Capital) is required to
maintain and prepares reports to stockholders, and reports and
other materials filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, Vastardis assists Prospect Capital in
determining and publishing Prospect Capitals net asset
value, overseeing the preparation and filing of Prospect
Capitals tax returns, and the printing and dissemination
of reports to stockholders of Prospect Capital, and generally
overseeing the payment of Prospect Capitals expenses and
the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to Prospect Capital by others.
Under the sub-administration agreement, Vastardis and its
officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons,
members, and any other person or entity affiliated with
Vastardis, are not liable to the Administrator or Prospect
Capital for any action taken or omitted to be taken by Vastardis
in connection with the performance of any of its duties or
obligations or otherwise as sub-administrator for the
Administrator on behalf of Prospect Capital. The agreement also
provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of Vastardis duties or by
reason of the reckless disregard of Vastardis duties and
obligations, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or
entity affiliated with Vastardis are entitled to indemnification
from the Administrator and Prospect Capital. All damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
incurred in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed
action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an
action or suit by or in the right of the Administrator or
Prospect Capital or the security holders of Prospect Capital)
arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of
Vastardis duties or obligations under the agreement or
otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf
of Prospect Capital.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the
F-25
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
operations of our portfolio companies, participating in board
and management meetings, consulting with and advising officers
of portfolio companies and providing other organizational and
financial guidance. We have received $452 in managerial
assistance for the year ended June 30, 2007, compared to
$193 in managerial assistance for the year ended June 30,
2006, and $77 in managerial assistance for the year ended
June 30, 2005. These fees are paid to the Administrator.
|
|
Note 6.
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
The following information sets forth the computation of basic
and diluted per share net increase in net assets resulting from
operations for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Numerator for increase in net assets per share
|
|
$
|
16,728
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted weighted average shares
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Basic and diluted net increase in net assets per share resulting
from operations
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
Note 7.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004(3)
|
|
|
Per Share Data(1) :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Costs related to the initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to the secondary public offering
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share issuances related to dividend reinvestment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets as a result of public offering
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
( 1.54
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
17.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total return based on market value(2)
|
|
|
12.65
|
%
|
|
|
44.90
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Total return based on net asset value(2)
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
19,949,065
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average weighted shares outstanding for period
|
|
|
15,724,095
|
|
|
|
7,056,846
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio/Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
300,048
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized ratio of net operating income to average net assets
|
|
|
9.71
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights are based on weighted average shares except
dividends declared and paid. |
F-26
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Capitals dividend
reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Capitals dividend reinvestment plan. The total
returns are not annualized. |
|
(3) |
|
Financial Highlights as of June 30, 2004 are considered not
applicable as the initial offering of common stock did not occur
as of this date. |
The Company is a defendant in a legal action arising out of its
activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has a meritorious defense for this action. We continue to
defend this action vigorously, and believe that resolution of
this action will not have a materially adverse effect on the
Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, Dallas Gas Partners (DGP)
served Prospect Capital with a complaint filed November 30,
2004 in the U.S. District for the Southern District of
Texas, Galveston Division. DGP alleges that DGP was defrauded
and that Prospect Capital breached its fiduciary duty to DGP and
tortiously interfered with DGPs contract to purchase Gas
Solutions, Ltd. (a subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in
connection with Prospect Capitals alleged agreement in
September 2004 to loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy
Gas Solutions, Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint
seeks relief not limited to $100,000. We believe that the DGP
complaint is frivolous and without merit, and intend to defend
the matter vigorously. On November 30, 2005,
U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
Prospect Capitals Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing
all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006, U.S. District
Judge Samuel Kent of the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division issued an order
granting Prospect Capitals Motion for Summary Judgment
dismissing all claims by Dallas Gas Partners, L.P., against
Prospect Capital Corporation. DGP has appealed this decision.
We are involved in various investigations, claims and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business.
These matters may relate to intellectual property, employment,
tax, regulation, contract or other matters. The resolution of
these matters as they arise will be subject to various
uncertainties and, even if such claims are without merit, could
result in the expenditure of significant financial and
managerial resources.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Revolving
Credit Agreements
|
On February 21, 2006, Prospect Capital entered into a
$20,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the
Previous Credit Facility) with Bank of Montreal as
administrative agent and Harris Nesbitt Corp. as sole lead
arranger and sole book runner. The Previous Credit Facility
supplemented the Companys equity capital and provided
funding for additional portfolio investments. All amounts
borrowed under the Previous Credit Facility would have matured,
and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder would have been
due and payable within six months of the date of the borrowing.
The Previous Credit Facility had a termination date of
August 21, 2006. On May 11, 2006, the Previous Credit
Facility was increased to $30,000.
On July 26, 2006, we closed a $50,000 revolving credit
facility (the Facility) with HSH Nordbank AG as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger, replacing the
$30,000 Previous Credit Facility. This Facility was used,
together with our equity capital, to make additional long-term
investments. Interest on borrowings under the Facility is
charged, at our option, at either (i) LIBOR plus the
applicable spread, ranging from 200 to
F-27
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
250 basis points (the refinanced facility being at
250 basis points over LIBOR), or (ii) the greater of
the lender prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus
50 to 100 basis points. The applicable spread decreases as
our equity base increases.
On June 6, 2007, Prospect Capital closed on a $200,000
three-year revolving credit facility with Rabobank Nederland as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger (the Rabobank
Facility). The Rabobank facility refinanced the $50,000 Facility
with HSH Nordbank AG. Interest on the Rabobank Facility is
charged at LIBOR plus 125 basis points. Additionally,
Rabobank charges 37.5 basis points on the unused portion of
the facility. At June 30, 2007, the investment used as
collateral had an aggregate market value of $195,966, which
represents 65.3% of net assets.
As of June 30, 2007, we had no amounts drawn down on the
Rabobank Facility.
|
|
Note 10.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On July 31, 2007, Prospect Capital provided $15,000 growth
financing to Wind River Resources Corporation and Wind
River II Corporation, a privately held oil and gas
production business based in Salt Lake City, Utah. The
investment was in the form of senior secured notes along with a
net profits interest.
On August 1, 2007, ESA Environmental Specialists, Inc.
(ESA), filed voluntarily for reorganization under
the bankruptcy code, in response to a foreclosure action by
Prospect Capital after Prospect Capital learned that
unauthorized cash distributions to management recently had been
made by the controlling shareholder and CEO. Prospect Capital
has a senior-secured, first-lien debt position with collateral
in the form of receivables, real estate, other assets, personal
guarantees, and the stock of ESAs profitable subsidiary
company The Healing Staff.
On August 7, 2007, Prospect Capital provided $6,000 growth
and recapitalization financing to Deep Down, Inc., a deepwater
drilling services and manufacturing provider based in Houston,
Texas. The investment was in the form of senior secured notes
plus warrants.
On August 16, 2007, Arctic Acquisition Corp. (dba Cougar
Pressure Control) repaid its unamortized loan in full to
Prospect Capital. Prospect Capital received a $400 prepayment
premium as well. Prospect Capital continues to hold warrants in
this investment.
On
August 28th Prospect
Capital provided $9,200 growth and recapitalization financing to
Diamondback Operating, LP, a gas production company based in
Tulsa, Oklahoma. The investment was in the form of senior
secured notes plus a net profits interest.
F-28
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 11.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (in thousands except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Net Assets from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Share*
|
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
( 0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
5,799
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
2,977
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
6,432
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Per share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares
during period. |
F-29
Prospectus dated September 6, 2007
$500,000,000
PROSPECT CAPITAL
CORPORATION
Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Warrants
Debt Securities
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or
series, together or separately, up to $500,000,000 of our common
stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants representing
rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock
or debt securities, (collectively, the Securities)
to provide us with funds to repay outstanding debt and to
acquire investments that we reasonably believe are in our
acquisition pipeline. Securities may be offered at prices and on
terms to be disclosed in one or more supplements to this
prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable
prospectus supplement carefully before you invest in our
Securities.
Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers, or through agents designated from time to time by
us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will
disclose any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or
discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters
or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount
may be calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may
not sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of the prospectus and a prospectus
supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of
such Securities. Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ
National Market under the symbol PSEC. As of
September 4, 2007, the last reported sales price for our
common stock was $16.70.
Prospect Capital Corporation (Prospect Capital or
the Company) is a company that lends to and invests
in middle market privately held or thinly traded public
companies.
The Company, a Maryland corporation, has been organized as a
closed-end investment company since April 13, 2004 and has
filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended
(the 1940 Act), and is a non-diversified investment
company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
Prospect Capital Management, LLC manages our investments and
Prospect Administration, LLC provides the administrative
services necessary for us to operate.
Investing in our Securities involves a heightened risk of
total loss of investment and is subject to risks. Before buying
any Securities, you should read the discussion of the material
risks of investing in our Securities in Risk Factors
on page 12 of this prospectus. Please read this prospectus
before you invest and keep it for future reference. The
prospectus sets forth concisely the information about Prospect
Capital that a prospective investor ought to know before
investing and should be retained for future reference.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved
or disapproved of these securities or determined if this
prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of
securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have
filed with the SEC, using the shelf registration
process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer,
from time to time on a delayed basis, up to $500,000,000 of our
common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants
representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities on the terms to be determined
at the time of the offering. The Securities may be offered at
prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this
prospectus. This prospectus provides you with a general
description of the Securities that we may offer. Each time we
use this prospectus to offer Securities, we will provide a
prospectus supplement that will contain specific information
about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may
also add, update or change information contained in this
prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any
prospectus supplement together with any exhibits and the
additional information described under the heading
Available Information and the section under the
heading Risk Factors before you make an investment
decision.
i
The following summary contains basic information about this
offering. It does not contain all the information that may be
important to an investor. For a more complete understanding of
this offering, we encourage you to read this entire document and
the documents to which we have referred.
Information contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus may contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, which are statements about the future that may be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
may, will, expect,
intend, plans, anticipate,
estimate or continue or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
These forward-looking statements do not meet the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements pursuant to Section 27A of the
Securities Act. The matters described in Risk
Factors and certain other factors noted throughout this
prospectus and in any exhibits to the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part, constitute cautionary
statements identifying important factors with respect to any
such forward-looking statements, including certain risks and
uncertainties, that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in such forward-looking statements. The
Company reminds all investors that no forward-looking statement
can be relied upon as an accurate or even mostly accurate
forecast because humans cannot forecast the future.
The terms we, us, our,
Company and Prospect Capital refer to
Prospect Capital Corporation; Prospect Capital
Management or the Investment Adviser refers to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC; Prospect
Administration or the Administrator refers to
Prospect Administration, LLC. and Prospect refers to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC, its affiliates and its
predecessor companies.
The
Company
Prospect Capital is a financial services company that lends to
and invests in middle market privately held or thinly traded
public companies.
We were originally organized under the name Prospect
Street Energy Corporation and we changed our name to
Prospect Energy Corporation in June 2004. We changed
our name again to Prospect Capital Corporation in
May 2007 and at the same time terminated our policy of investing
at least 80% of our net assets in energy companies. We have been
organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004 and have filed an election to be treated as
a business development company under the 1940 Act, and we are a
non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management, an affiliate of Prospect Capital,
manages our investment activities. Prospect Capital Management
is an investment adviser that has been registered under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Advisers
Act, since March 31, 2004. Under an investment
advisory agreement between the Company and Prospect Capital
Management (the Investment Advisory Agreement), we
have agreed to pay Prospect Capital Management investment
advisory fees, which will consist of an annual base management
fee based on our gross assets (which include any amount
borrowed, i.e.. total assets without deduction for any
liabilities) as well as a two-part incentive fee based on our
performance. Our headquarters are located at 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor New York, NY 10016, and our
telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
The
Offering
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or
series, together or separately, up to $500,000,000 of our
Securities to provide us with funds to repay outstanding debt
and to acquire investments that we reasonably believe are in our
acquisition pipeline.
Our Securities may be offered directly to one or more
purchasers, to new stockholders, via an optional cash purchase,
in which such new stockholder can purchase Securities directly
from the Company for cash, or designated offeree program, in
which certain designated individuals who may or may not be new
shareholders can purchase Securities directly from the Company
for cash, or through agents designated from time to time
1
by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus
supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of
the offering, including the name or names of any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities by us, the
purchase price, and any fee, commission or discount arrangement
between us and our agents or underwriters or among our
underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not
sell any of our Securities through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of our Securities.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering
of our Securities:
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend
to use the net proceeds from the sale of our Securities for
general corporate purposes, which may include investments in
securities, repayment of indebtedness, acquisitions and other
general corporate purposes. Pending these uses, we will invest
the net proceeds primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S.
government securities and other high-quality debt investments
that mature in one year or less from the date of investment. See
Use of Proceeds. |
|
Distributions |
|
We have paid quarterly distributions to the holders of our
common stock and generally intend to continue to do so. The
amount of the quarterly distributions is determined by our Board
of Directors and is based on our estimate of our investment
company taxable income and net short- term capital gains.
Certain amounts of the quarterly distributions may from time to
time be paid out of our capital rather than from earnings for
the quarter as a result of our deliberate planning or by
accounting reclassifications. Distributions to a stockholder
that constitute a return of capital (i.e., distributions in
excess of our current or accumulated earnings or profits) will
reduce the stockholders adjusted tax basis in such
stockholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is
reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such
stockholders. Certain additional amounts may be deemed as
distributed to stockholders for income tax purposes. Other types
of Securities will likely pay distributions in accordance with
their terms. See Price Range of Our Common Stock,
Distributions and Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Considerations. |
|
Taxation |
|
We have qualified and elected to be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or
RIC. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay
corporate-level federal income taxes on any ordinary income or
capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as
dividends. To maintain our qualification as a RIC and obtain RIC
tax treatment, we must maintain specified source-of-income and
asset diversification requirements and distribute annually at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of assets legally available for
distribution. See Distributions and Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations. |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
We have a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. This
is an opt out dividend reinvestment plan. As a
result, when we declare a dividend, the dividends to
stockholders are automatically reinvested in additional shares
of our common stock, unless stockholders specifically opt
out of the dividend reinvestment plan so |
2
|
|
|
|
|
as to receive cash dividends. Stockholders who receive
distributions in the form of stock are subject to the same
federal, state and local tax consequences as stockholders who
elect to receive their distributions in cash. See Dividend
Reinvestment Plan. |
|
The NASDAQ National Market Symbol |
|
PSEC |
|
Anti-takeover provisions |
|
Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and
regulatory requirements, contain provisions that may have the
effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition
proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a
change in control in circumstances that could give the holders
of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over
the market price of our common stock. See Description of
Our Capital Stock. |
|
Management arrangements |
|
Prospect Capital Management serves as our investment adviser.
Prospect Administration serves as our administrator and has
engaged Vastardis Fund Services, LLC (formerly, EOS
Fund Services LLC, Vastardis), as
sub-administrator. For a description of Prospect Capital
Management, Prospect Administration, Vastardis and our
contractual arrangements with these companies, see
Management Investment Advisory
Agreement, and Administration Agreement. |
|
Risk factors |
|
Investment in our Securities involves certain risks relating to
our structure and investment objectives that should be
considered by the prospective purchasers of the Securities. In
addition, investment in our Securities involves certain risks
relating to investing in the energy sector, including but not
limited to risks associated with commodity pricing, regulation,
production, demand, depletion and expiration, weather, and
valuation. We have a limited operating history upon which you
can evaluate our business. In addition, as a business
development company, our portfolio includes securities primarily
issued by privately held companies. These investments may
involve a high degree of business and financial risk, and are
generally less liquid than public securities. We are required to
mark the carrying value of our investments to fair value on a
quarterly basis, and economic events, market conditions and
events affecting individual portfolio companies can result in
quarter-to-quarter mark-downs and
mark-ups of
the value of individual investments that collectively can
materially affect our net asset value. Also, our determinations
of fair value of privately-held securities may differ materially
from the values that would exist if there was a ready market for
these investments. A large number of entities compete for the
same kind of investment opportunities as we do. Moreover, our
business requires a substantial amount of cash to operate and to
grow, and we are dependent on external financing. In addition,
the failure to qualify as a RIC eligible for pass-through tax
treatment under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, or the Code, on income distributed to
stockholders could have a materially adverse effect on the total
return, if any, obtainable from an investment in our Securities.
See Risk Factors, Business Our
Investment Objectives and Policies and the other
information |
3
|
|
|
|
|
included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you
should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our
Securities. |
|
|
|
Plan of distribution |
|
We may offer, from time to time, up to $500,000,000 of our
common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or warrants
representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock,
preferred stock or debt securities, on terms to be determined at
the time of the offering, which may include an optional cash
purchase in which such new stockholder can purchase Securities
directly from the Company for cash or designated offeree program
in which certain designated individuals can purchase Securities
directly from the Company for cash. Securities may be offered at
prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this
prospectus directly to one or more purchasers, or through agents
designated from time to time by us, or to or through
underwriters or dealers. The supplement to this prospectus
relating to the offering will identify any agents or
underwriters involved in the sale of our Securities, and will
set forth any applicable purchase price, fee and commission or
discount arrangement or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. We may not sell Securities pursuant to this
prospectus without delivering a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of such Securities. For
more information, see Plan of Distribution. |
|
Recent Developments |
|
On April 12, 2007, we announced that we provided
acquisition and growth financing of approximately
$12.2 million to ESA Environmental Specialists, Inc.
(ESA), located in Charlotte, North Carolina. ESA is
a construction, engineering, and environmental services firm
headquartered in Charlotte that provides energy-related and
other services primarily to the U.S. Government. After a default
in our credit agreement with ESA, we commenced a foreclosure
with respect to certain collateral securing our investment, and
in response, ESA filed voluntarily for reorganization under the
bankruptcy code. We have a senior-secured, first-lien debt
position with collateral in the form of receivables, real
estate, other assets, personal guarantees, and the stock of
ESAs subsidiary company The Healing Staff. Our loan to ESA
represents approximately 3.9% of our current asset base. We
believe the fair value of this investment will be materially
reduced by reason of ESAs bankruptcy and related
proceedings. |
|
|
|
On June 5, 2007, we announced that we provided growth
financing of approximately $10.8 million to Ken-Tex Energy
Corp. (Ken-Tex), located in Dallas, Texas. Ken-Tex
is an independent energy company engaged in the development and
production of crude oil and natural gas hydrocarbons in East
Texas. |
|
|
|
On June 6, 2007, we announced that we closed a
$200 million three-year revolving credit facility with
Rabobank Nederland as administrative agent and sole lead
arranger. This credit facility is being used to refinance our
$50 million credit facility and, together with our equity
capital, to make additional long-term investments. |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings under the $200 million credit
facility is charged at LIBOR plus 125 basis points. |
|
|
|
On June 29, 2007, we announced that we provided debt and
equity of approximately $19.5 million for the acquisition
of R-V Industries, Inc. (R-V), located in Honey
Brook, Pennsylvania. R-V designs and fabricates steel and other
metal products for customers in a range of industries, including
power generation, paper manufacturing, health sciences,
petrochemicals, and food processing. |
|
|
|
On July 5, 2007, we announced that we committed to provide,
and subsequently funded, growth financing of approximately
$45.0 million to H&M Oil & Gas, LLC
(H&M), located in Dallas, Texas. H&M is an
oil and gas production and development company focused on Texas. |
|
|
|
On July 13, 2007, we announced that we committed to
provide, and subsequently funded, debt financing of
$25.0 million to Regional Management Corp.
(RMC), located in Greenville, South Carolina. RMC is
a consumer finance installment loan company that offers a
variety of credit products to individuals with limited access to
traditional sources of consumer credit. |
|
|
|
On August 1, 2007, we announced that we provided growth
financing of approximately $15.0 million to the Wind River
Resources Corporation and Wind River II Corporation
(collectively, Wind River), a privately held oil and
gas production business based in Salt Lake City, Utah. Wind
River is engaged in the exploration, development and production
of crude oil and natural gas in Utahs Uinta basin. |
|
|
|
On August 9, 2007, we announced that we provided growth and
recapitalization financing of approximately $6.0 million to
Deep Down, Inc. (Deep Down), a deepwater drilling
services and manufacturing provider based in Houston, Texas. |
|
|
|
On August 29, 2007, we announced that we provided growth
and recapitalization financing of approximately
$9.2 million to Diamondback Operating, LP
(Diamondback), an oil and gas production company
based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. |
5
Fees and
Expenses
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding
the costs and expenses that an investor in this offering will
bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that some of the
percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may
vary. The table is based on our net assets at March 31,
2007 and assumes that we have borrowed all $200 million
available under our line of credit on that date, although no
plans are currently in place to borrow this amount. Except where
the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus
contains a reference to fees or expenses paid by
you, us or Prospect Capital,
or that we will pay fees or expenses, stockholders
will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in
Prospect Capital.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder transaction expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Offering expenses borne by us (as a percentage of offering
price)(2)
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses(3)
|
|
|
None
|
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of
offering price)(4)
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable
to common stock)*:
|
|
|
|
|
Combined base management fee (3.41%(5)) and incentive fee
(2.32%(6))
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
4.64
|
%(7)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1.83
|
%(8)
|
Acquired fund fees and expenses
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
Total annual expenses
|
|
|
12.20
|
%(6)(8)(9)
|
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount
of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various
periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common
stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have
assumed we would have borrowed all $200 million available
under our line of credit and that our annual operating expenses
would remain at the levels set forth in the table above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
3 Years
|
|
5 Years
|
|
10 Years
|
|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment,
assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
$
|
163.9
|
|
|
$
|
415.6
|
|
|
$
|
693.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,517.8
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net assets attributable to our common stock equal net assets
(i.e., total assets less liabilities other than liabilities for
money borrowed for investment purposes) at March 31, 2007. |
|
(1) |
|
In the event that the Securities to which this prospectus
relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding
prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated applicable
sales load. |
|
(2) |
|
The related prospectus supplement will disclose the estimated
amount of offering expenses, the offering price and the
estimated offering expenses borne by us as a percentage of the
offering price. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of the dividend reinvestment plan are included in
other expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
The related prospectus supplement will disclose the offering
price and the total stockholder transaction expenses as a
percentage of the offering price. |
|
(5) |
|
Our base management fee is 2.00% of our gross assets (which
include any amount borrowed, i.e., total assets without
deduction for any liabilities). Although no plans are in place
to borrow the full amount under our line of credit, assuming
that we borrowed $200 million, the 2.00% management fee of
gross assets equals approximately 3.41% of net assets. See
Management Investment Advisory Agreement
and footnote 6 below. |
|
(6) |
|
We expect to invest all of the net proceeds from each offering
of securities registered under the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part within six months or less of the
date of the completion of such offering and may have capital
gains and interest income that could result in the payment of an
incentive |
6
|
|
|
|
|
fee to our Investment Adviser in the first year after completion
of this offering. However, the incentive fee payable to our
investment adviser under the investment advisory agreement is
based on our performance and will not be paid unless we achieve
certain goals. In the chart above, we have assumed a
pre-incentive fee net investment income of 11.62% as a
percentage of net assets. The incentive fee consists of two
parts. The first part, the income incentive fee, which is
payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 20% of the excess, if
any, of our pre-incentive fee net investment income that exceeds
a 1.75% quarterly (7% annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a
catch up provision measured as of the end of each
calendar quarter. In the three months ended March 31, 2007,
we paid an incentive fee of $1,754,000 (see calculation below).
We expect the incentive fees we pay to increase to the extent we
earn greater interest and dividend income through our
investments in portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent,
realize capital gains upon the sale of warrants or other equity
investments in our portfolio companies. The
catch-up
provision requires us to pay 100% of our pre-incentive fee net
investment income with respect to that portion of such income,
if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 125% of
the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75%
annualized assuming an annualized hurdle rate of 7%). The
catchup provision is meant to provide our Investment Adviser
with 20% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a
hurdle rate did not apply when our pre-incentive fee net
investment income exceeds 125% of the quarterly hurdle rate in
any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming an annualized
hurdle rate of 7%). The income incentive fee will be computed
and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but
not yet received in cash. If interest income is accrued but
never paid, the Board would decide to write off the accrual in
the quarter when the accrual is determined to be uncollectible.
The write off would cause a decrease in interest income for the
quarter equal to the amount of the prior accrual. The investment
adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part
of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued
income that we never receive as a result of a default by an
entity on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such
income. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income used to
calculate the income incentive fee is also included in the
amount of our gross assets used to calculate the 2% base
management fee (see footnote 5 above). The second part of the
incentive fee, the capital gains incentive fee, will equal 20%
of our realized capital gains, if any, computed net of all
realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation. |
Examples of how the incentive fee is calculated are as follows:
Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 0.55%, there
would be no income incentive fee because such income would not
exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75%.
Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 2.00%, the
income incentive fee would be as follows:
= 100% × (2.00% − 1.75%)
= 0.25%
Assuming pre-incentive fee net investment income of 2.30%, the
income incentive fee would be as follows:
= (100% ×
(catch-up:
2.1875% − 1.75%)) + (20% × (2.30% −
2.1875%))
= (100% × 0.4375%) + (20% ×0.1125%) = 0.4375% +
0.0225% = 0.46%
Assuming net realized capital gains of 6% and realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation of 1%, the capital
gains incentive fee would be as follows:
= 20% × (6% − 1%)
= 20% × 5% = 1%
7
The following is a calculation of the most recently paid
incentive fee of $1,754,000 in March 2007 (for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007):
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Quarter Net Asset Value
|
|
$
|
289,238,000
|
|
Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
1.7500
|
%**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
5,062,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125% of the Quarterly Hurdle Rate
|
|
|
2.1875
|
%
|
125% of the Current Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
6,327,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Quarter Pre Incentive Fee Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
12,069,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Fee
Catch-Up
|
|
$
|
1,265,000
|
|
Incentive Fee 20% in excess of 125% of the Current
Quarter Hurdle
|
|
$
|
489,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Quarter Incentive Fee
|
|
$
|
1,754,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed discussion of the calculation of the
two-part incentive fee, see Management
Investment Advisory Agreement. |
|
(7) |
|
Although we may incur indebtedness before the proceeds of an
offering are substantially invested, we have not yet decided to
what extent we will finance investments using debt. We currently
have $200 million available to us under a credit facility.
For more information, see Risk Factors Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income and Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources, Capital Raising Activities. The table
above assumes that we have borrowed all $200 million
available under our line of credit, although no plans are in
place to borrow the full amount under our line of credit. The
table below shows our estimated annual expenses as a percentage
of net assets attributable to common stock, assuming that we did
not incur any indebtedness. |
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
Incentive fees payable under Investment Advisory Agreement (20%
of realized capital gains and 20% of pre-incentive fee net
investment income)
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds
|
|
|
None
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
Total annual expenses (estimated)
|
|
|
6.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Other expenses is based on an estimate of expenses
during the current fiscal year representing all of our estimated
recurring operating expenses (except fees and expenses reported
in other items of this table) that are deducted from our
operating income and reflected as expenses in our Statement of
Operations. The estimate of our overhead expenses, including
payments under the administration agreement based on our
projected allocable portion of overhead and other expenses
incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement. Other
expenses does not include non-recurring expenses. See
Management Administration Agreement. |
|
(9) |
|
Total annual expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable
to our common stock are higher than the total annual expenses
percentage would be for a company that is not leveraged. We
borrow money to leverage our net assets and increase our total
assets. The total annual expenses percentage is required by the
SEC to be calculated as a percentage of net assets, rather than
the total assets including assets that have been funded with
borrowed monies. If the total annual expense percentage were
calculated as a percentage of total assets, our total annual
expenses would be 7.16% of total assets. |
|
|
|
While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual
return, our performance will vary and may result in a return
greater or less than 5%. The income incentive fee under the
Investment Advisory Agreement would be zero at the 5% annual
return assumption, as required by the SEC for this table, since
no incentive fee is paid until the annual return exceeds 7%;
however, the income incentive fee currently being earned is
nevertheless used to aggregate total expenses in the example as
if the annual return were |
8
|
|
|
|
|
at the level recently achieved, which is higher than 5%, in
accordance with SEC requirements. Accordingly, the resulting
calculations overstate expenses at the 5% annual return as these
calculations do not reflect the provisions of the Investment
Advisory Agreement as it would actually be applied in the case
of a 5% annual return. This illustration assumes that we will
not realize any capital gains computed net of all realized
capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation in any of the
indicated time periods. If we achieve sufficient returns on our
investments, including through the realization of capital gains,
to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, our expenses,
and returns to our investors after such expenses, would be
higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of
all dividends and distributions at net asset value, participants
in our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of
shares of our common stock, determined by dividing the total
dollar amount of the dividend payable to a participant by the
market price per share of our common stock at the close of
trading on the valuation date for the dividend. See
Dividend Reinvestment Plan for additional
information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan. |
|
|
|
This example and the expenses in the table above should not
be considered a representation of our future expenses. Actual
expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other
expenses) may be greater or less than those shown. |
9
SELECTED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands)
You should read the condensed financial information below with
the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this
prospectus. Financial information for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial
statements for that period. Quarterly financial information is
derived from unaudited financial data, but in the opinion of
management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the
results of such interim periods. Interim results for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending June 30, 2006. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations on page 25 for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
4,825
|
|
|
$
|
1,767
|
|
|
$
|
11,493
|
|
|
$
|
5,038
|
|
|
$
|
7,557
|
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
Interest income, controlled entities
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
1,319
|
|
|
|
9,455
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Dividend income, controlled entities
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
Other income(2)
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
11,071
|
|
|
|
16,869
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Income incentive fee
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
7,410
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Interest expense and credit facility costs
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer and Sub- administration fees
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Organizational costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
8,311
|
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
14,782
|
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(2,038
|
))
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
(4,851
|
)
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in stockholders equity resulting
from operations
|
|
$
|
4,976
|
|
|
$
|
2,955
|
|
|
$
|
11,880
|
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
Basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in stockholders
equity per common share resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
10
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to confirm to current
periods presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Net Profits Interest, Prepayment Penalties not related
to loans, Deal Deposit Income and Overriding Royalty Interests. |
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the
periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the Nine
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
15.24
|
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Proceeds from initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
Costs related to the initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Costs related to the secondary public offering
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share issuance related to dividend reinvestment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Realized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Net increase in assets as a result of secondary public offering
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(1.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
15.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
15.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of period
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
Total return based on market value(2)
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
|
|
37.35
|
%
|
|
|
44.79
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset value(2)
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.19
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
13.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
19,879,231
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
19,879,231
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Ratio/supplemental data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
6.79
|
%
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of operating income to average net assets
|
|
|
9.23
|
%
|
|
|
8.13
|
%
|
|
|
9.36
|
%
|
|
|
7.12
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights are based on weighted average shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market per share between the opening and ending market prices
per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Capitals dividend
reinvestment plan. Total returns based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Capitals dividend reinvestment plan. The total
returns are not annualized. |
11
Investing in our Securities involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in
our Securities. The risks set out below are not the only risks
we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value
and the trading price of our common stock could decline, or the
value of our preferred stock, debt securities or warrants may
decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
The process for valuation of our portfolio investments as
of June 30, 2007 has not been completed, and, when this process
is completed as of June 30, 2007, our net asset value per
share is expected to decline somewhat since our last valuation
at March 31, 2007.
On August 22, 2007, our Board of Directors voted
unanimously to value our portfolio with an aggregate NAV per
share of $15.04, a decline of $0.14 from the last quarterly
valuation, and to have our year end financial statements
prepared using that valuation. This valuation is unaudited and
may change upon completion of audit of our financial statements
as described below.
Our Board of Directors determines the fair value of our
portfolio investments on a quarterly basis based on input from
our Investment Adviser, the audit committee of our Board of
Directors and a third party independent valuation firm. This
process was last completed as of March 31, 2007. While our
independent valuation firm has conducted its evaluation in
connection with the preparation of our audited financial
statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, the
process for that evaluation is not yet finally complete and the
audit committee of our Board of Directors has not yet finally
approved our audited financial statements for inclusion in our
annual report on
Form 10-K.
It is anticipated that the process will finally be completed
shortly before the filing of our annual report on
Form 10-K.
In the period since the independent valuation firm last
conducted an evaluation of our investment portfolio, the fair
value of individual investments in our portfolio may have
changed significantly, and, based on the valuation of our
portfolio by our Board of Directors as described above, the
Company expects our net asset value per share to decline
somewhat (but not significantly); however, the final
determination of our net asset value per share as of
June 30, 2007, will not be known until the audit of our
financial statements as of that date is completed, which will be
subsequent to completion of this offering. If our Board of
Directors determines that our net asset value per share at
June 30, 2007 was less than such fair value at
March 31, 2007, then we will record unrealized loss on our
investment portfolio and report a lower net asset value per
share than is reflected in the Selected Condensed Financial Data
and the financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. If our Board of Directors determines that our net
asset value per share at June 30, 2007 was greater than
such value at March 31, 2007, we will record unrealized
gain on our investment portfolio and report a greater net asset
value per share than so reflected elsewhere in this prospectus.
Upon publication of this information in connection with our
announcement of operating results for our fiscal year ended
June 30, 2007, the market price of our common stock may
fluctuate materially, and may be substantially less than the
price per share you pay for our common stock in this offering.
Potential writedowns or losses with respect to two
portfolio investments or on other portfolio investments,
existing and to be made in the future, could adversely affect
our results of operations, cash flows, dividend level, net asset
value and stock price.
As of the date of this prospectus, loans we have made to ESA
Environmental Specialists, Inc. (ESA) and Advantage
Oilfield Group Ltd. (Advantage) are under enhanced
scrutiny by our senior management team due to existing or
potential payment
and/or
covenant defaults under the contracts governing these
investments. ESA recently defaulted under our contract governing
our investment in ESA, prompting us to commence foreclosure
actions with respect to certain ESA assets in respect of which
we have a priority lien. In response to our actions, ESA filed
voluntarily for reorganization under the bankruptcy code. At
March 31, 2007, our investment in ESA was carried at
approximately $13.8 million. We have a senior-secured,
first-lien debt position with collateral in the form of
receivables, real estate, other assets, personal guaranties and
the stock of ESAs subsidiary company, The Healing Staff.
Our loan to ESA represents approximately 3.9% of our
12
current asset base. We believe the fair value of this investment
will be materially reduced at June 30, 2007 by reason of
ESAs bankruptcy and related proceedings. At its
August 22, 2007 meeting referenced above, our board of
directors reduced the fair value of our investment in ESA from
$13.8 million to $5.0 million, negatively impacting
our NAV per share by $0.44.
Advantage provides construction services to the gas industry,
primarily in Alberta, which has experienced a significant
slowdown in gas related construction activity. At March 31,
2007, our investment in Advantage was carried at approximately
$17.0 million. We have a senior-secured, first-lien debt
position with collateral consisting of substantially all of
Advantages assets. Advantage has experienced a business
slowdown and liquidity problems, and the Investment Adviser
believes Advantage could continue to experience payment and
covenant defaults. In addition, we may be required to provide
additional capital to Advantage to permit it to continue to
operate until its liquidity improves and its business prospects
are realized. Our investment in Advantage represents
approximately 4.9% of our current asset base. We believe the
fair value of this investment will be materially reduced at
June 30, 2007. At its August 22, 2007 meeting
referenced above, our Board of Directors reduced the fair value
of our investment in Advantage from $17.1 million to
$9.9 million, negatively impacting our NAV per share by
$0.36.
Risks
Relating To Our Business And Structure
We are
dependent upon Prospect Capital Managements key management
personnel for our future success.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business
contacts of the senior management of Prospect Capital
Management. We also depend, to a significant extent, on our
Investment Advisers access to the investment professionals
and the information and deal flow generated by these investment
professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio
management activities. For a description of the senior
management team, see Management. The senior
management team evaluates, negotiates, structures, closes,
monitors and services our investments. Our success depends to a
significant extent on the continued service of the senior
management team, particularly John F. Barry III and M.
Grier Eliasek. The departure of any of the senior managers of
Prospect Capital Management could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to achieve our investment objective. In addition,
we can offer no assurance that Prospect Capital Management will
remain our Investment Adviser or that we will continue to have
access to its investment professionals or its information and
deal flow.
Our
Investment Adviser and its senior management have limited
experience managing a business development company under the
1940 Act.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of
business development companies. For example, business
development companies are required to invest at least 70% of
their total assets primarily in securities of privately held or
thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high
quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. Our
Investment Advisers and its senior managements
limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such
constraints may hinder their ability to take advantage of
attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve
our investment objective. In addition, our investment strategies
differ in some ways from those of other investment funds that
have been managed in the past by the investment professionals.
We are
a relatively new company with limited operating
history.
We were incorporated in April 2004 and have conducted investment
operations as a business development company since July 2004. We
are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties
associated with any new business enterprise, including the risk
that we may not achieve our investment objective and that the
value of your investment in us could decline substantially or
fall to zero. We completed our initial public offering on
July 27, 2004. As of March 31, 2007, we continue to
pursue our investment strategy and 70.0% of our net assets are
invested in long-term investments, with the remainder invested
in U.S. government and money market securities. Dividends
that we pay prior to being fully invested may be substantially
lower than the
13
dividends that we expect to pay when our portfolio is fully
invested. If we do not realize yields in excess of our expenses,
we may incur operating losses and the market price of our shares
may decline.
Our
financial condition and results of operations will depend on our
ability to manage our future growth effectively.
Prospect Capital Management has been registered as an investment
adviser since March 31, 2004, and Prospect Capital has been
organized as a closed-end investment company since
April 13, 2004. As such, each entity is subject to the
business risks and uncertainties associated with any young
business enterprise, including the limited experience in
managing or operating a business development company under the
1940 Act. Our ability to achieve our investment objective
depends on our ability to grow, which depends, in turn, on our
Investment Advisers ability to continue to identify,
analyze, invest in and monitor companies that meet our
investment criteria. Accomplishing this result on a
cost-effective basis is largely a function of our Investment
Advisers structuring of investments, its ability to
provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and
our access to financing on acceptable terms. As we grow, we and
Prospect Capital Management need to continue to hire, train,
supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future
growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
operate in a highly competitive market for investment
opportunities.
A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of
investments that we make in target companies. We compete with
other business development companies, public and private funds,
commercial and investment banks and commercial financing
companies. Additionally, because competition for investment
opportunities generally has increased among alternative
investment vehicles, such as hedge funds, those entities have
begun to invest in areas they have not traditionally invested
in, including investments in middle-market companies. As a
result of these new entrants, competition for investment
opportunities at middle-market companies has intensified and we
expect that trend to continue. Many of our existing and
potential competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a
lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not
available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have
higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which
could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and
establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our
competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that
the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. We
cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of
existing and increasing competition, we may not be able to take
advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to
time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to
identify and make investments that are consistent with our
investment objective.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates
that we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors make
loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than
the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we
do not match our competitors pricing, terms and structure.
If we match our competitors pricing, terms and structure,
we may experience decreased net interest income and increased
risk of credit loss.
Regulations
governing our operation as a business development company affect
our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional
capital.
We may issue debt securities or preferred stock
and/or
borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which
we refer to collectively as senior securities, up to
the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the
provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business
development company, to issue senior securities only in amounts
such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals
at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the
value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this
test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of
our investments or sell additional shares of common stock and,
depending on the nature of our leverage, to repay a portion of
our indebtedness at a time
14
when such sales may be disadvantageous. In addition, issuance of
additional securities could dilute the percentage ownership of
our current stockholders in us.
As a business development company regulated under provisions of
the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to issue and sell our
common stock at a price below the current net asset value per
share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants,
options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below
the current net asset value of our common stock in a rights
offering to our stockholders or if (1) our Board of
Directors determines that such sale is in the Companys and
our stockholders best interests, (2) our stockholders
approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less
than the current net asset value, and (3) the price at
which our common stock is to be issued and sold may not be less
than a price which, in the determination of our Board of
Directors, closely approximates the market value of such
securities (less any sales load).
In addition, we have securitized, and we may in the future seek
to securitize, our loans to generate cash for funding new
investments. To securitize loans, we may create a wholly owned
subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to such subsidiary.
This could include the sale of interests in the subsidiary on a
non-recourse basis to purchasers who we would expect to be
willing to accept a lower interest rate to invest in investment
grade loan pools. We would retain a portion of the equity in the
securitized pool of loans. An inability to successfully
securitize our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow
our business and fully execute our business strategy, and could
decrease our earnings, if any. Moreover, the successful
securitization of our loan portfolio exposes us to a risk of
loss for the equity we retain in the securitized pool of loans
might expose us to losses because the residual loans in which we
do not sell interests may tend to be those that are riskier and
more likely to generate losses. A successful securitization may
also impose financial and operating covenants that restrict our
business activities and may include limitations that could
hinder our ability to finance additional loans and investments
or to make the distributions required to maintain our status as
a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code.
If we
fail to qualify as a RIC, we will have to pay corporate-level
taxes on our income, and our income available for distribution
would be reduced.
To maintain our qualification as a RIC under the Code, and
obtain RIC tax treatment, we must meet certain source of income,
asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. The
annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we
distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net
short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis.
Because we expect to use debt financing in the future, we are
subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the
1940 Act and financial covenants that could, under certain
circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary
to qualify for RIC tax treatment. If we are unable to obtain
cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax
treatment and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income
tax. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also meet
certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each
calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our
having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to
prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments
are in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at
disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If
we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason or become subject to
corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could
substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income
available for distribution, and the actual amount of our
distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse
effect on us and our shares. For additional information
regarding asset coverage ratio and RIC requirements, see
Regulation Senior securities and
Material U.S. federal income tax considerations.
We may
have difficulty paying our required distributions if we
recognize income before or without receiving cash representing
such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we include in income certain
amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original
issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in
connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other
circumstances, or
payment-in-kind
interest, which represents contractual interest added to the
loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original
issue discount, which could be
15
significant relative to our overall investment activities, or
increases in loan balances as a result of
payment-in-kind
arrangements, are included in our income before we receive any
corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we do not receive in cash.
While we focus primarily on investments that will generate a
current cash return, our investment portfolio may also include
securities that do not pay some or all of their return in
periodic current cash distributions.
The income incentive fee payable by us is computed and paid on
income that may include interest that has been accrued but not
yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan
that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible
that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the
income incentive fee will become uncollectible.
Since in some cases we may recognize taxable income before or
without receiving cash representing such income, we may have
difficulty meeting the tax requirement to distribute at least
90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if
any, to maintain RIC tax treatment. Accordingly, we may have to
sell some of our investments at times we would not consider
advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce
new investment originations to meet these distribution
requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other
sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC treatment and thus
become subject to corporate-level income tax. See Material
U.S. federal income tax considerations Taxation
as a RIC.
If we
issue senior securities, including debt, you will be exposed to
additional risks, including the typical risks associated with
leverage.
|
|
|
|
|
You will be exposed to increased risk of loss if we incur debt
to make investments. If we do incur debt, a decrease in the
value of our investments or in our revenues would have a greater
negative impact on the value of our common stock than if we did
not use debt.
|
|
|
|
Our ability to pay dividends would be restricted if our asset
coverage ratio were not at least 200% and any amounts that we
use to service our indebtedness would not be available for
dividends to our common stockholders.
|
|
|
|
It is likely that any debt we incur will be governed by an
indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting
our operating flexibility.
|
|
|
|
We and you will bear the cost of issuing and servicing our
senior securities.
|
|
|
|
Any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the
future may have rights, preferences and privileges more
favorable than those of our common stock.
|
Changes
in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net
investment income.
We expect that a significant portion of our debt investments
will bear interest at fixed rates and the value of these
investments could be negatively affected by increases in market
interest rates. In addition, an increase in interest rates would
make it more expensive to use debt to finance our investments.
As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates
could both reduce the value of our portfolio investments and
increase our cost of capital, which would reduce our net
investment income.
We
need to raise additional capital to grow because we must
distribute most of our income.
We need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. A
reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our
ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our ordinary
income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of
realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our
shareholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, such
earnings are not available to fund investment originations. We
have sought additional capital by borrowing from financial
institutions and may issue debt securities or additional equity
securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from
other sources to fund our investments, it could limit our
ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value
of our Securities. In addition,
16
as a business development company, we are generally required to
maintain a ratio of at least 200% of total assets to total
borrowings, which may restrict our ability to borrow in certain
circumstances.
Most
of our portfolio investments are recorded at fair value as
determined in good faith by our Board of Directors and, as a
result, there is uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
A large percentage of our portfolio investments consist of
securities of privately held or thinly traded public companies.
The fair value of these securities is often not readily
determinable. The determination of fair value, and thus the
amount of unrealized losses we may incur in any year, is to a
degree subjective, and the Investment Advisor has a conflict of
interest in making the determination. We value these securities
quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors based on input from our Investment Adviser, a third
party independent valuation firm and our audit committee. Our
Board of Directors utilizes the services of an independent
valuation firm to aid it in determining the fair value of any
securities. The types of factors that may be considered in fair
value pricing of our investments include the nature and
realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which
the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly
traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant
factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of
private securities and private companies, are inherently
uncertain, the valuations may fluctuate over short periods of
time and may be based on estimates. The determinations of fair
value by our Board of Directors may differ materially from the
values that would have been used if a ready market for these
securities existed. Our net asset value could be adversely
affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our
investments were materially higher than the values that we
ultimately realize upon the disposal of such securities.
The
lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our
business.
We generally make investments in private companies.
Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and
other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than
publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments
may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the
need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or
a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly
less than the value at which we have previously recorded our
investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our
ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the
extent that we or our Investment Adviser has material non-public
information regarding such portfolio company.
We may
experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results due to a number of factors, including the interest or
dividend rates payable on the debt or equity securities we
acquire, the default rate on debt securities, the level of our
expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we
encounter competition in our markets, the seasonality of the
energy industry, weather patterns, changes in energy prices and
general economic conditions. As a result of these factors,
results for any period should not be relied upon as being
indicative of performance in future periods.
Potential
conflicts of interest could impact our investment
returns.
Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers
of our Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, may
serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that
operate in the same or related lines of business as we do or of
investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they
may have obligations to investors in those entities, the
fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or
our stockholders. Nevertheless, it is possible that new
investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may
come to the attention of one of these entities in connection
with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so,
such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made
available, to us. However, as an investment adviser, Prospect
Capital Management has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best
interests of its clients, including us. To that end, if Prospect
Capital Management or its affiliates manage any additional
investment vehicles or client accounts in the future, Prospect
Capital Management will endeavor to allocate investment
opportunities in a fair and equitable manner over time so as not
to discriminate unfairly
17
against any client. If Prospect Capital Management chooses to
establish another investment fund in the future, when the
investment professionals of Prospect Capital Management identify
an investment, they will have to choose which investment fund
should make the investment.
In the course of our investing activities, under the Investment
Advisory Agreement we pay base management and incentive fees to
Prospect Capital Management, and reimburse Prospect Capital
Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result of the
Investment Advisory Agreement, there may be times when the
management team of Prospect Capital Management has interests
that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a
conflict.
Prospect Capital Management receives a quarterly income
incentive fee based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net
investment income, if any, for the immediately preceding
calendar quarter. This income incentive fee is subject to a
fixed quarterly hurdle rate before providing an income incentive
fee return to the Investment Adviser. To the extent we or
Prospect Capital Management are able to exert influence over our
portfolio companies, the income incentive fee may provide
Prospect Capital Management with an incentive to induce our
portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other
obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another.
This fixed hurdle rate has been based on current interest rates,
which are currently relatively low on a historical basis. Thus,
if interest rates rise, it would become easier for our
investment income to exceed the hurdle rate and, as a result,
more likely that our Investment Adviser will receive an income
incentive fee than if interest rates on our investments remained
constant or decreased. Subject to the receipt of any requisite
shareholder approval under the 1940 Act, our Board of Directors
may readjust the hurdle rate by amending the Investment Advisory
Agreement.
The income incentive fee payable by Prospect Capital is computed
and paid on income that may include interest that has been
accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company
defaults on a loan that has a deferred interest feature, it is
possible that interest accrued under such loan that has
previously been included in the calculation of the income
incentive fee will become uncollectible. If this happens, our
Investment Adviser is not required to reimburse us for any such
income incentive fee payments. If we do not have sufficient
liquid assets to pay this incentive fee or distributions to
stockholders on such accrued income, we may be required to
liquidate assets in order to do so. This fee structure could
give rise to a conflict of interest for our Investment Adviser
to the extent that it may encourage the Investment Adviser to
favor debt financings that provide for deferred interest, rather
than current cash payments of interest. In addition, the amount
of the Investment Advisers compensation under the
incentive fee, is due, in part to the amount of unrealized
depreciation accrued by the Company.
We have entered into a royalty-free license agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Under this agreement, Prospect
Capital Management agrees to grant us a non-exclusive license to
use the name Prospect Capital. Under the license
agreement, we have the right to use the Prospect
Capital name for so long as Prospect Capital Management or
one of its affiliates remains our Investment Adviser. In
addition, we rent office space from Prospect Administration, an
affiliate of Prospect Capital Management, and pay Prospect
Administration our allocable portion of overhead and other
expenses incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations as Administrator under the administration agreement,
including rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our
chief financial officer and chief compliance officer and their
respective staffs. This may create conflicts of interest that
our Board of Directors monitors.
Changes
in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely
affect our business.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws
at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and
regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed
from time to time. Accordingly, changes in these laws or
regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business. For additional information regarding the regulations
we are subject to, see Regulation.
18
Risks
Related To Our Investments
We may
not realize gains or income from our investments.
Through our investment objectives and policies, we seek to
generate both current income and capital appreciation. However,
the securities we invest in may not appreciate and, in fact, may
decline in value, and the issuers of debt securities we invest
in may default on interest
and/or
principal payments. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize
gains from our investments, and any gains that we do realize may
not be sufficient to offset any losses we experience. See
Business Our Investment Objective and Policies
and Policies.
Our
portfolio is concentrated in a limited number of portfolio
companies in the energy industry, which subject us to a risk of
significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its
obligations under any of the securities that we hold or if the
energy industry experiences a downturn.
As of February 28, 2007, we had invested in
19 companies in the energy industry. A consequence of this
lack of diversification is that the aggregate returns we realize
may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of
such investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the
value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax
diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines
for diversification, and our investments are concentrated in
relatively few portfolio companies. We estimate that, once we
have invested substantially all of the net proceeds of this
offering, we will have invested in approximately 25 to 50
portfolio companies, depending on the availability of
appropriate investment opportunities consistent with our
investment objective and market conditions. In addition, to date
we have concentrated on making investments in the energy
industry. While we expect to be less focused on the energy
industry in the future, we anticipate that we will continue to
have significant holdings in the energy industry. As a result, a
downturn in the energy industry could materially adversely
affect us in an adverse manner.
The
energy industry is subject to many risks.
As of March 31, 2007, seventy percent of our net assets
were invested in the energy industry. Our definition of energy,
as used in the context of the energy industry, is broad, and
different sectors in the energy industry may be subject to
variable risks and economic pressures. As a result, it is
difficult to anticipate the impact of changing economic and
political conditions on our portfolio companies and, as a
result, our financial results. The revenues, income (or losses)
and valuations of energy companies can fluctuate suddenly and
dramatically due to any one or more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Pricing Risk. While we generally do
not invest in companies that accept completely unhedged
commodity risk, energy companies in general are directly
affected by energy commodity prices, such as the market prices
of crude oil, natural gas and wholesale electricity, especially
for those who own the underlying energy commodity. In addition,
the volatility of commodity prices can affect other energy
companies due to the impact of prices on the volume of
commodities transported, processed, stored or distributed and on
the cost of fuel for power generation companies. The volatility
of commodity prices can also affect energy companies
ability to access the capital markets in light of market
perception that their performance may be directly tied to
commodity prices. Historically, energy commodity prices have
been cyclical and exhibited significant volatility. Although we
require adherence to strict risk controls, including appropriate
commodity and other hedges, by each of our portfolio companies,
some of our portfolio companies may not engage in hedging
transactions to minimize their exposure to commodity price risk.
For those companies that engage in such hedging transactions,
they remain subject to market risks, including market liquidity
and counterparty creditworthiness.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Risk. The profitability of energy
companies could be adversely affected by changes in the
regulatory environment. The businesses of energy companies are
heavily regulated by federal, state and local governments in
diverse manners, such as the way in which energy assets are
constructed, maintained and operated and the prices energy
companies may charge for their products and services. Such
regulation can change over time in scope and intensity. For
example, a particular by-product of an energy process may be
declared hazardous by a regulatory agency, which can
unexpectedly increase production costs. Moreover, many state and
federal environmental laws provide for civil penalties as
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
well as regulatory remediation, thus adding to the potential
liability an energy company may face. In addition, the
deregulation of energy markets and the unresolved regulatory
issues related to some power markets such as California create
uncertainty in the regulatory environment as rules and
regulations may be adopted on a transitional basis. We cannot
assure you that the deregulation of energy markets will continue
and if it continues, whether its impact on energy
companies profitability will be positive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Risk. The profitability of energy
companies may be materially impacted by the volume of crude oil,
natural gas or other energy commodities available for
transporting, processing, storing, distributing or power
generation. A significant decrease in the production of natural
gas, crude oil, coal or other energy commodities, due to the
decline of production from existing facilities, import supply
disruption, depressed commodity prices, political events, OPEC
actions or otherwise, could reduce revenue and operating income
or increase operating costs of energy companies and, therefore,
their ability to pay debt or dividends. In recent months, OPEC
has announced changes in production quotas in response to
changing market conditions, including near record high oil
prices in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Demand Risk. A sustained decline in demand for
crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products and
electricity could materially affect revenues and cash flows of
energy companies. Factors that could lead to a decrease in
market demand include a recession or other adverse economic
conditions, an increase in the market price of the underlying
commodity, higher taxes or other regulatory actions that
increase costs, or a shift in consumer demand for such products.
|
|
|
|
Depletion and Exploration Risk. A portion of
any one energy companys assets may be dedicated to natural
gas, crude oil
and/or coal
reserves and other commodities that naturally deplete over time.
Depletion could have a material adverse impact on such
companys ability to maintain its revenue. Further,
estimates of energy reserves may not be accurate and, even if
accurate, reserves may not be fully utilized at reasonable
costs. Exploration of energy resources, especially of oil and
gas, is inherently risky and requires large amounts of capital.
|
|
|
|
Weather Risk. Unseasonable extreme weather
patterns could result in significant volatility in demand for
energy and power. This volatility may create fluctuations in
earnings of energy companies.
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk. Energy companies are subject
to various operational risks, such as failed drilling or well
development, unscheduled outages, underestimated cost
projections, unanticipated operation and maintenance expenses,
failure to obtain the necessary permits to operate and failure
of third-party contractors (for example, energy producers and
shippers) to perform their contractual obligations. In addition,
energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing cash
flow, including increasing utilization of existing facilities,
expanding operations through new construction, expanding
operations through acquisitions, or securing additional
long-term contracts. Thus, some energy companies may be subject
to construction risk, acquisition risk or other risk factors
arising from their specific business strategies.
|
|
|
|
Competition Risk. The progress in deregulating
energy markets has created more competition in the energy
industry. This competition is reflected in risks associated with
marketing and selling energy in the evolving energy market and a
competitors development of a lower-cost energy or power
source, or of a lower cost means of operations, and other risks
arising from competition.
|
|
|
|
Valuation Risk. Since mid-2001, excess power
generation capacity in certain regions of the United States has
caused substantial decreases in the market capitalization of
many energy companies. While such prices have recovered to some
extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market
capitalization will not recur, or that any future decreases in
energy company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in
nature.
|
|
|
|
Terrorism Risk. Since the
September 11th attacks, the United States government
has issued public warnings indicating that energy assets,
specifically those related to pipeline infrastructure,
production facilities and transmission and distribution
facilities, might be specific targets of terrorist activity. The
continued threat of terrorism and related military activity will
likely increase volatility for prices of natural gas and oil and
could affect the market for products and services of energy
companies. In
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
addition, any future terrorist attack or armed conflict in the
United States or elsewhere may undermine economic conditions in
the United States in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Risk. Some of our portfolio
companies rely on the capital markets to raise money to pay
their existing obligations. Their ability to access the capital
markets on attractive terms or at all may be affected by any of
the risks associated with energy companies described above, by
general economic and market conditions or by other factors. This
may in turn affect their ability to satisfy their obligations
with us.
|
Our
investments in prospective portfolio companies may be risky and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Some of our portfolio companies have relatively short or no
operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to
all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any
new business enterprise, including the risk that these companies
may not reach their investment objective and the value of our
investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
In addition, investment in the middle market companies that we
are targeting involves a number of other significant risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
these companies may have limited financial resources and may be
unable to meet their obligations under their securities that we
hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value
of their equity securities or of any collateral with respect to
debt securities and a reduction in the likelihood of our
realizing on any guarantees we may have obtained in connection
with our investment;
|
|
|
|
they may have shorter operating histories, narrower product
lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which
tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions
and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;
|
|
|
|
because many of these companies are privately held companies,
public information is generally not available about these
companies. As a result, we will depend on the ability of our
Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate
these companies in making investment decisions. If our
Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information
about these companies, it may not make a fully informed
investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments;
|
|
|
|
they are more likely to depend on the management talents and
efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death,
disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these
persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio
company and, in turn, on us;
|
|
|
|
they may have less predictable operating results, may from time
to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in changing
businesses with products subject to a risk of obsolescence and
may require substantial additional capital to support their
operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive
position. In addition, our executive officers, directors and our
Investment Adviser could, in the ordinary course of business, be
named as defendants in litigation arising from proposed
investments or from our investments in the portfolio companies.
|
Economic
recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and
harm our operating results.
Our portfolio companies will generally be affected by the
conditions and overall strength of the national, regional and
local economies, including interest rate fluctuations, changes
in the capital markets and changes in the prices of their
primary commodities and products. These factors also impact the
amount of residential, industrial and commercial growth in the
energy industry. Additionally, these factors could adversely
impact the customer base and customer collections of our
portfolio companies.
As a result, many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible
to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay
our loans or meet other obligations during these periods.
Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase, and
the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease, during these
periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value
of collateral securing some of our loans
21
and the value of our equity investments. Economic slowdowns or
recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a
decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable
economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit
our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by
lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent
us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or
operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to
defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger
cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio
companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or
equity securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the
extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate
new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if
one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though
we may have structured our interest as senior debt or preferred
equity, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the
extent to which we actually provided managerial assistance to
that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize
our debt or equity holding and subordinate all or a portion of
our claim to those of other creditors.
Our
portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities
that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such
companies.
We invest primarily in mezzanine debt and dividend-paying equity
securities issued by our portfolio companies. Our portfolio
companies usually have, or may be permitted to incur, other
debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with,
or senior to, the securities in which we invest. By their terms,
such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to
receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in
respect of the securities in which we invest. Also, in the event
of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking
senior to our investment in that portfolio company would
typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we
receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After
repaying the senior security holders, the portfolio company may
not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation
to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with securities
in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any
distributions with other security holders in the event of an
insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or
bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we
may not be in a position to control any portfolio company in
which we invest. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a
portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions
with which we disagree and the management of such company, as
representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take
risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests
as debt or preferred equity investors.
We may
not be able to fully realize the value of the collateral
securing our debt investments.
Although a substantial amount of our debt investments are
protected by holding security interests in the assets of the
portfolio companies, we may not be able to fully realize the
value of the collateral securing our investments due to one or
more of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
since our debt investments are primarily made in the form of
mezzanine loans, our liens on the collateral, if any, are
subordinated to those of the senior secured debt of the
portfolio companies, if any. As a result, we may not be able to
control remedies with respect to the collateral;
|
|
|
|
the collateral may not be valuable enough to satisfy all of the
obligations under our secured loan, particularly after giving
effect to the repayment of secured debt of the portfolio company
that ranks senior to our loan;
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy laws may limit our ability to realize value from the
collateral and may delay the realization process;
|
|
|
|
our rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the
failure to perfect security interests in the collateral;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
how effectively the collateral would be liquidated and the value
received could be impaired or impeded by the need to obtain
regulatory and contractual consents; and
|
|
|
|
by its nature, some or all of the collateral may be illiquid and
may have no readily ascertainable market value. The liquidity
and value of the collateral could be impaired as a result of
changing economic conditions, competition, and other factors,
including the availability of suitable buyers.
|
Our
incentive fee could induce Prospect Capital Management to make
speculative investments.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
may create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to make
investments on our behalf that are more speculative or involve
more risk than would be the case in the absence of such
compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee
payable is determined (calculated as a percentage of the return
on invested capital) may encourage the Investment Adviser to use
leverage to increase the return on our investments. The use of
leverage would increase the likelihood of default, which would
disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because the
Investment Adviser will receive an incentive fee based, in part,
upon net capital gains realized on our investments, the
Investment Adviser may invest more than would otherwise be
appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield
capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such
a practice could result in our investing in more speculative
securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result
in higher investment losses, particularly during economic
downturns.
The incentive fee payable by us to Prospect Capital Management
also could create an incentive for our Investment Adviser to
invest on our behalf in instruments, such as zero coupon bonds,
that have a deferred interest feature. Under these investments,
we would accrue interest income over the life of the investment
but would not receive payments in cash on the investment until
the end of the term. Our net investment income used to calculate
the income incentive fee, however, includes accrued interest.
For example, accrued interest, if any, on our investments in
zero coupon bonds will be included in the calculation of our
incentive fee, even though we will not receive any cash interest
payments in respect of payment on the bond until its maturity
date. Thus, a portion of this incentive fee would be based on
income that we may not have yet received in cash.
Our
investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks
in addition to the risks inherent in U.S.
investments.
Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in
securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies
may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with
investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in
exchange control regulations, political and social instability,
expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets
and less available information than is generally the case in the
United States, higher transaction costs, less government
supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed
bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual
obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards
and greater price volatility.
Although currently all of our investments are, and we expect
that most of our investments will be,
U.S. dollar-denominated, our investments that are
denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk
that the value of a particular currency will change in relation
to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may
affect currency values are trade balances, the level of
short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of
similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities
for investment and capital appreciation, and political
developments.
We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we
can offer no assurance that such strategies will be effective.
If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to
risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize
instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and
interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge
against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio
positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market
interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our
portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of
fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses
if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging
can establish other
23
positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby
offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions.
Such hedging transaction may also limit the opportunity for gain
if the values of the portfolio positions should increase.
Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange
rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally
anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging
transaction at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions depends on our ability
to correctly predict movements, currencies and interest rates.
Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to
reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks,
unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest
rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than
if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. The
degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments
used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio
positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of
reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation
between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings
being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from
achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In
addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly
against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities
denominated in
non-U.S. currencies.
Risks
Relating To Our Securities
There
is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our
dividends may not grow over time.
We have made and intend to continue to make distributions on a
quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will
achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will
allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or
year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, due
to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a business
development company, we may be limited in our ability to make
distributions. See Distributions.
Provisions
of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and
bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact
on the price of our common stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging,
delaying or making more difficult a change in control and
preventing the removal of incumbent directors. We are covered by
the Maryland Business Combination Act to the extent such statute
is not superseded by applicable requirements of the 1940 Act.
However, our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution
exempting any business combination between us and any other
person from the Maryland Business Combination Act, subject to
prior approval of such business combination by our Board,
including a majority of our directors who are not interested
persons as defined in the 1940 Act. In addition, the Maryland
Control Share Acquisition Act provides that control shares of a
Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition
have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our
bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Maryland Control
Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of
our shares of stock. If the applicable board resolution is
repealed or our Board does not otherwise approve a business
combination, the Maryland Business Combination Act and the
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (if we amend our bylaws
to be subject to that Act) may discourage others from trying to
acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of
consummating any offer.
Additionally, under our charter, our Board of Directors is
divided into three classes serving staggered terms; our Board of
Directors may, without stockholder action, authorize the
issuance of shares of stock in one or more classes or series,
including preferred stock; and our Board of Directors may,
without stockholder action, amend our charter to increase the
number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have
authority to issue. The existence of these provisions, among
others, may have a negative impact on the price of our common
stock and may discourage third party bids for ownership of our
Company. These provisions may prevent any premiums being offered
to you for shares of our common stock.
24
Investing
in our Securities may involve a high degree of
risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment
objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative
investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our
investments in portfolio companies may be speculative and
aggressive, and therefore, an investment in our shares may not
be suitable for someone with low risk tolerance.
The
market price of our Securities may fluctuate
significantly.
The market price and liquidity of the market for our Securities
may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which
are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our
operating performance. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other companies
in the energy industry, which are not necessarily related to the
operating performance of these companies;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly
with respect to RICs or business development companies;
|
|
|
|
loss of RIC status;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
departure of one or more of Prospect Capital Managements
key personnel;
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates;
|
|
|
|
litigation matters;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source.
|
We may
allocate the net proceeds from any offering in ways with which
you may not agree.
We will have significant flexibility in investing the net
proceeds of any offering of our Securities. We may use the net
proceeds from the offering in ways with which you may not agree
or for investments other than those contemplated at the time of
the offering, unless such change in the use of proceeds is
subject to stockholders approval or prohibited by law.
Sales
of substantial amounts of our Securities in the public market
may have an adverse effect on the market price of our
Securities.
As of May 14, 2007, we have 19,879,231 shares of
common stock outstanding. Sales of substantial amounts of our
Securities or the availability of such Securities for sale could
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our Securities.
If this occurs and continues, it could impair our ability to
raise additional capital through the sale of Securities should
we desire to do so.
25
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Prospect Capital was incorporated under the Maryland General
Corporation Law in April 2004. We were originally organized
under the name Prospect Street Energy Corporation
and we changed our name to Prospect Energy
Corporation in June 2004. We changed our name again to
Prospect Capital Corporation in May 2007 and at the
same time terminated our policy of investing at least 80% of our
net assets in energy companies. We have elected to be treated as
a business development company under the 1940 Act. Accordingly,
we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements.
For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our
total assets in qualifying assets, including
securities of private or thinly traded public
U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and high-quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less.
We completed our initial public offering on July 27, 2004.
As of March 31, 2007, we continue to pursue our investment
strategy and 70.0% of our net assets are invested in long-term
investments, with the remainder invested in U.S. government
and money market securities.
Some of our portfolio companies have relatively short or no
operating histories. These companies are and will be subject to
all of the business risk and uncertainties associated with any
new business enterprise, including the risk that these companies
may not reach their investment objective and the value of our
investment in them may decline substantially or fall to zero.
Our portfolio generated an annualized current yield of 17.0% and
18.0% as of March 31, 2007 and as of March 31, 2006,
respectively, across all our long-term debt and equity
investments. This yield includes interest from all of our
long-term investments as well as dividends from Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc. (GSHI). We expect this number to
decline over time as we become fully invested. Monetization of,
or dividends from, other equity positions that we hold is not
included in this yield estimate.
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 to Three Months
Ended March 31, 2006
Investment
Activity
We completed our twelfth quarter, which was our eleventh full
quarter since completion of our initial public offering on
July 30, 2004, with approximately 70.0% of our net assets
or about $211.2 million invested in nineteen long-term
portfolio investments and 33.0% of our net assets invested in
money market funds. The remainder (3.0%) of our net assets
represents liabilities in excess of other assets.
Long-Term
Portfolio Investments
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we completed one
new investment with our investment in C&J Cladding, LLC
(C&J) and follow-on investments in existing
portfolio companies, totaling approximately $19,701.
Additionally, on March 5, 2007, Cypress Consulting
Services, Inc. completely paid its loan with an additional
prepayment penalty of $1,960 for both the loan and the net
profits interest.
On March 30, 2007, the Company invested $6,000 in C&J,
a metal services company located in Houston, Texas. The
Companys investment was on the form of senior secured debt
and we also received warrants which represent a significant
equity position.
We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in
the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the
ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed
to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated
investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser
degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of
5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another
person.
26
As of March 31, 2007, we held a controlling interest in
AOG, GSHI, Genesis, NRG, WECO and Whymore. As of March 31,
2007, we held an affiliated interest in AEH and Iron Horse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Level of Control
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Control
|
|
$
|
110,268
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
44,045
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
14,751
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
|
|
|
86,234
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
49,515
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
%
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
99,584
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,681
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
$
|
310,837
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
104,241
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Investment Adviser continues to conduct due diligence and
finalize terms regarding future transactions. However, we can
offer no assurance as to when or if any of these transactions
will close.
Investment
Income
We generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt
securities that we own, dividend income on any common or
preferred stock that we own, and amortized loan origination fees
on the structuring of new deals. Our investments, if in the form
of debt securities, will typically have a term of one to ten
years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. To the
extent achievable, we will seek to collateralize our investments
by obtaining security interests in our portfolio companies
assets. We also may acquire minority or majority equity
interests in our portfolio companies, which may pay cash or
in-kind dividends on a recurring or otherwise negotiated basis.
In addition, we may generate revenue in other forms including
prepayment penalties and possibly consultation fees. Any such
fees generated in connection with our investments are recognized
as earned.
Investment income, which consists of interest income, dividend
income and amortized loan origination fees as well as other
income, was $12,069 and $4,026 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and
$26,672 and $11,071 for the nine months ended March 31,
2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively.
Operating
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of investment advisory
fees (base and incentive fees), credit facility costs, legal and
professional fees and other operating and overhead-related
expenses. These expenses include our allocable portion of
overhead under the Administration Agreement with Prospect
Administration under which Prospect Administration provides
administrative services and facilities for Prospect Capital. Our
investment advisory fees compensate our Investment Adviser for
its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and
monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses
of our operations and transactions in accordance with our
Administration Agreement with Prospect Administration.
Operating expenses were $5,054 and $1,900 for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively,
and $11,890 and $5,489 for the nine months ended March 31,
2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. These expenses
consisted of investment advisory and administrative services
fees, credit facility costs, professional fees, insurance
expenses, directors fees and other general and
administrative expenses. The base investment advisory fees were
$1,531 and $521 for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $3,715 and $1,554 for
the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31,
2006, respectively. $1,754 and $533 income incentive fees were
earned for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006, respectively, and $3,695 and $1,041 income
incentive fees were earned for the nine months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. No
capital gains incentive fee has yet been incurred pursuant to
the Investment Advisory Agreement.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company
incurred $353 of expenses related to the credit facility,
comprised of $290 in amortization of deferred financing costs,
and $63 in commitment fees on the unused portion of the credit
facility. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the
Company incurred
27
$1,385 of expenses related to the credit facility, comprised of
$357 in interest expense, $836 in amortization of deferred
financing fees and $192 in commitment fees on the unused portion
of the credit facility. During the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2006, the Company incurred $12 in interest
expenses.
Net
Investment Income, Net Realized Gains, Net Unrealized
Appreciation and Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from
Operations
Prospect Capitals net investment income was $7,015 and
$2,126 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006, respectively, and $14,782 and $5,582 for
the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31,
2006, respectively. Net investment income represents the
difference between investment income and operating expenses and
is directly impacted by the items described above. Net realized
gains (losses) were ($1) and $1 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, and
$1,949 and ($18) for the nine months ended March 31, 2007
and March 31, 2006, respectively. Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) was ($2,038) and $828 for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006,
respectively, and ($4,851) and $1,392 for the nine months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively. Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations represents the
sum of the returns generated from net investment income,
realized gains (losses) and the change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation).
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We used cash flows in operating activities totaling $8,191 and
$158,213 for the three and nine months ended March 31,
2007, respectively, compared to $2,844 and $2,984 for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. We
declared dividends totaling $7,667 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 compared to $2,116 for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. In the future, we may continue to
fund a portion of our investments through borrowings from banks,
issuances of senior securities or secondary offerings. We may
also securitize a portion of our investments in mezzanine or
senior secured loans or other assets. Our objective is to put in
place such borrowings in order to expand our portfolio. Our
primary use of funds will be investments in portfolio companies
and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
At March 31, 2007, we held no cash in the segregated
account maintained in conjunction with a limited indemnity
issued to Citibank Texas, N.A. (formerly First American Bank,
SSB). The limited indemnity with Citibank required us to
indemnify Citibank for up to $12,000 for any losses it realizes
on its term loan to GSHI resulting only from potential legal
claims that might or could be asserted by certain third parties.
This limited indemnity was backed by the funds in the segregated
account.
Capital
Raising Activities
On December 13, 2006, the Company priced a public offering
of 6,000,000 shares of common stock at $17.70 per share,
raising $106,200 in gross proceeds as well as an additional
810,000 shares of common stock at $17.70 per share raising
$14,337 in gross proceeds in the exercise of an over-allotment
option on January 11, 2007.
On February 21, 2006, Prospect Capital entered into a
$20 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the
Previous Credit Facility) with Bank of Montreal as
administrative agent and Harris Nesbitt Corp. as sole lead
arranger and sole book runner. The Previous Credit Facility
supplemented the Companys equity capital and provided
funding for additional portfolio investments. All amounts
borrowed under the Previous Credit Facility would have matured,
and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder would have been
due and payable within six months of the date of the borrowing.
The Previous Credit Facility had a termination date of
August 21, 2006. On May 11, 2006, the Previous Credit
Facility was increased to $30 million.
On July 26, 2006, we closed a $50 million revolving
credit facility (the Facility) with HSH Nordbank AG
as administrative agent and sole lead arranger, replacing the
$30 million Previous Credit Facility. This Facility was
used, together with our equity capital, to make additional
long-term investments. Interest on borrowings under the Facility
is charged, at our option, at either (i) LIBOR plus the
applicable spread, ranging from 200 to 250 basis points
(the refinanced facility being at 250 basis points over
LIBOR), or (ii) the greater of the lender prime rate or the
federal funds effective rate plus 50 to 100 basis points.
The applicable spread decreases as our equity base increases.
28
As of March 31, 2007, we had no amounts drawn down on the
Facility.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in
interest rates, equity price risk and some of the loans in our
portfolio may have floating rates. To date, a significant, but
declining, percentage of our assets have been and are invested
in short-term U.S. treasury bills. We may hedge against
interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments
such as futures, options and forward contracts subject to the
requirements of the 1940 Act. While hedging activities may
insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may
also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of higher
interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments.
During the three months ended September 30, 2006, the six
months ended March 31, 2007 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006, we did not engage directly in hedging
activities.
Controls
and Procedures
As of March 31, 2007, Prospect Capital carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
Prospect Capitals management, including Prospect
Capitals chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
Prospect Capitals disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15
of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer have concluded
that Prospect Capitals current disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them of material
information relating to Prospect Capital that is required to be
disclosed by Prospect Capital in the reports it files or submits
under the Exchange Act.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
management, under the supervision and with the participation of
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such responsibility is
defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act, and for performing an assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Prospect Capitals internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide
absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives
because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over
financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence
and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and
breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over
financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or
improper management override. Because of such limitations, there
is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial
reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known
features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is
possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce,
thought not eliminate, this risk.
There have been no changes in Prospect Capitals internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
RIC
Status
We elected an August 31st fiscal year end for income
tax reporting purposes, commencing with the initial taxable year
ended August 31, 2004. Our fiscal year-end for financial
reporting purposes will remain June 30th.
29
The Company has qualified and elected to be subject to taxation
as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code commencing with its
taxable year ended August 31, 2004. As long as the Company
continues to qualify as a RIC, the Company will not be subject
to tax on its investment company taxable income or its net
capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains
are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, as dividends to
our stockholders on a timely basis. Certain investments in
partnerships, limited liability companies, joint ventures and
other pass through entities can create enhanced
risks of failing to comply with the requirements applicable to
regulated investment companies under the Code. Dividends and
distributions declared and paid to stockholders may differ from
net income for financial reporting and taxable fiscal years due
to the timing of recognition of income and expenses, realization
of gains and losses, occurrence of a return of capital,
and/or net
realized appreciation or depreciation in investments, which may
not be included in taxable income.
To remain in compliance with Subchapter M of the Code with
respect to the Companys taxable year, the Company is
generally required to maintain its status as a business
development company in accordance with the 1940 Act, derive at
least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, gains
from the sales of securities and other specified types of income
required under Subchapter M of the Code, satisfy certain asset
diversification requirements as defined in Subchapter M of the
Code, and distribute to stockholders at least 90% of the
Companys investment company taxable income as defined in
Subchapter M of the Code. However, we offer no assurance that we
will continue to qualify for such treatment in future taxable
years. If we fail to qualify as a RIC, we would be subject to
corporate-level taxes on our taxable income, whether or not such
taxable income is distributed to our stockholders. The
imposition of corporate-level taxes on us would substantially
reduce the amount of income available for distribution to our
stockholders. Even if we qualify as a RIC for any taxable year
in question, we would be subject to corporate-level income tax
on any income not distributed to our stockholders. Moreover, we
would be subject to a 4%, entity-level excise tax, for any
calendar year in which we do not distribute an amount equal to
or exceeding the sum of 98% of our calendar year ordinary income
and 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period
ended October 31st, computed in accordance with
Section 4982 of the Code.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In determining the fair value of our investments at
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, the Audit Committee
considered valuations from an independent valuation firm and
from management having an aggregate range of $200.1 million
to $214.2 million and $93.6 million to
$96.7 million, respectively.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
income and expenses during the reported period. Changes in the
economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters
used in determining these estimates could cause actual results
to differ.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Capital:
We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments
involved in the accounting policies described below have the
greatest potential impact on our financial statements. We
consider these to be our critical accounting policies and they
are consistently applied by us:
Investments:
(a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date
basis.
(b) Valuation:
(1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
(2) Short-term investments, which mature in 60 days or
less, such as U.S. treasury bills, are valued at amortized
cost, which approximates market value. The amortized cost method
involves valuing a security at its cost on the date of purchase
and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of
30
the difference between the principal amount due at maturity and
cost. Short-term securities, which mature in more than
60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
(3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process,
which is under the direction of our Board of Directors.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in interest rates, the financial environment in which the
portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar
publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the
inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of
investments that do not have a readily available market value,
the fair value of these investments may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for such investments, and any such differences could be
material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the Audit Committee
reviews the preliminary evaluations prepared by the independent
valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors. Management and
the independent valuation firm respond to the preliminary
evaluation to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews the final valuation report and makes
a recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation process. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and
undertakes a similar analysis to determine the fair value of
each investment in the portfolio in good faith.
(4) The Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) has recently issued a new pronouncement
addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Number 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). This statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157
does not become effective until November 2007 and is not
expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
(c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
(d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium
and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income.
(e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
(f) Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal
or interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when
there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be
collected. Accrued interest is generally reversed when a loan is
placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on
non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to
principal depending upon managements judgment. Non-accrual
loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and
interest is paid and in managements judgment, are likely
to remain current.
31
(g) The Company includes Net Profits Interest, Prepayment
Penalties not related to loans, Deal Deposit Income and
Overriding Royalty Interests as Other Income on the Statement of
Operations. Prepayment Penalties related to loans are recorded
as Interest Income on the Statement of Operations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Prospect Capital currently engages in no off-balance sheet
arrangements including any risk management of commodity pricing
or other hedging practices.
Contractual
Obligations
The Company has future obligations for investment advisory and
administrative services. Such descriptions may be found under
Management Services Investment Advisory Agreement
(Page 37) and Management Services
Administration Agreement (Page 42), respectively.
Comparison
of the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006 to Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2005
Information regarding Managements Discussion and Analysis
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 is incorporated by
reference from the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as amended, filed September 29, 2006.
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend
to use the net proceeds from selling Securities pursuant to this
prospectus for general corporate purposes, which may include
investing in portfolio companies in accordance with our
investment objective and strategies, repayment of indebtedness,
investing in cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year
or less from the date of investment. The supplement to this
prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the
use of the proceeds from such offering.
We anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds of an
offering of Securities pursuant to this prospectus will be used
for the above purposes within six months, depending on the
availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent
with our investment objective and market conditions. In
addition, we expect that there will be several offerings
pursuant to this prospectus; therefore we expect that
substantially all of the proceeds from all offerings will be
used within three years. Pending our new investments, we plan to
invest a portion of net proceeds in cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt
investments that mature in one year or less from the date of
investment and other general corporate purposes. The management
fee payable by us will not be reduced while our assets are
invested in such securities. See Regulation
Temporary investments for additional information about
temporary investments we may make while waiting to make
longer-term investments in pursuit of our investment objective.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking
statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on
current expectations, estimates and projections about our
industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as
anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, and estimates and variations of
these words and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties,
and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and
difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed or forecasted in the
forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
an economic downturn could impair our customers ability to
repay our loans and increase our non-performing assets,
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the energy
industry, in which many of our investments are presently based,
causing us to suffer losses in our portfolio and experience
diminished demand for capital in this industry sector,
|
|
|
|
a contraction of available credit
and/or an
inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending
and investment activities,
|
|
|
|
interest rate volatility could adversely affect our
results and
|
|
|
|
the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus and in
our filings with the SEC.
|
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these
forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of
those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result,
the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also
could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability
to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and
levels of profitability and the availability of additional
capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the
inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this
prospectus should not be regarded as a representation by us that
our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and
uncertainties include those described or identified in
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. You
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which apply only as of the date of this prospectus.
We have paid and intend to continue to distribute quarterly
distributions to our stockholders out of assets legally
available for distribution. Our distributions, if any, will be
determined by our Board of Directors. Certain amounts of the
quarterly distributions may from time to time be paid out of our
capital rather than from earnings for the quarter as a result of
our deliberate planning or by accounting reclassifications.
In order to maintain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute at
least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any, out of the assets legally available for
distribution. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on
RICs, we currently intend to distribute during each calendar
year an amount at least equal to the sum of
|
|
|
|
|
98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year,
|
|
|
|
98% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar
year, and
|
|
|
|
any ordinary income and net capital gains for preceding years
that were not distributed during such years.
|
In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized
net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital gains in excess
of short-term capital losses), if any, at least annually, out of
the assets legally available for such distributions, we may
decide in the future to retain such capital gains for
investment. In such event, the consequences of our retention of
net capital gains are as described under Material
U.S. federal income tax considerations. We can offer
no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the
payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior
securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if
doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios
stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by
the terms of any of our borrowings.
We maintain an opt out dividend reinvestment plan
for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a
dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common
stock, unless they specifically opt out of the
dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. See
Dividend reinvestment plan. To the extent prudent
and practicable, we intend to declare and pay dividends on a
quarterly basis.
33
With respect to the dividends paid to shareholders, income from
origination, structuring, closing, commitment and other upfront
fees associated with investments in portfolio companies were
treated as taxable income and accordingly, distributed to
shareholders. Since our initial public offering we have
distributed over 100% of our taxable income to our stockholders.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, we declared total
distributions of approximately $7.9 million.
Tax characteristics of all distributions will be reported to
stockholders, as appropriate, on
Form 1099-DIV
after the end of the year. Our ability to pay distributions
could be affected by future business performance, liquidity,
capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and loan
covenants.
The following table lists the quarterly distributions per share
since shares of our common stock began being regularly quoted on
The NASDAQ National Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Record Date
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
11/11/2004
|
|
|
12/10/2004
|
|
|
|
12/30/2004
|
|
|
$
|
0.100
|
|
|
$
|
705,510
|
|
2/9/2005
|
|
|
3/11/2005
|
|
|
|
3/30/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.125
|
|
|
$
|
881,888
|
|
4/21/2005
|
|
|
6/10/2005
|
|
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.150
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,265
|
|
9/15/2005
|
|
|
9/22/2005
|
|
|
|
9/29/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
$
|
1,411,020
|
|
12/12/2005
|
|
|
12/22/2005
|
|
|
|
12/29/2005
|
|
|
$
|
0.280
|
|
|
$
|
1,975,428
|
|
3/15/2006
|
|
|
3/23/2006
|
|
|
|
3/30/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.300
|
|
|
$
|
2,116,530
|
|
6/14/2006
|
|
|
6/23/2006
|
|
|
|
6/30/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.340
|
|
|
$
|
2,401,060
|
|
7/31/2006
|
|
|
9/22/2006
|
|
|
|
9/29/2006
|
|
|
$
|
0.380
|
|
|
$
|
4,858,879
|
|
12/15/2006
|
|
|
12/29/2006
|
|
|
|
1/5/2007
|
|
|
$
|
0.385
|
|
|
$
|
7,263,926
|
|
3/30/2007
|
|
|
3/23/2007
|
|
|
|
3/30/2007
|
|
|
$
|
0.3875
|
|
|
$
|
7,666,837
|
|
Total Declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,672,343
|
|
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ National Market under
the symbol PSEC. The following table sets forth, for
the periods indicated, our net asset value per share of common
stock and the high and low sales prices per share of our common
stock as reported on The NASDAQ National Market. Our common
stock historically trades at prices both above and below its net
asset value. There can be no assurance, however, that such
premium or discount, as applicable, to net asset value will be
maintained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium (Discount)
|
|
|
Premium (Discount)
|
|
|
|
Value per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of High Sales Price
|
|
|
of Low Sales Price
|
|
|
|
Share(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
to Net Asset Value
|
|
|
to Net Asset Value
|
|
|
Nine months ended
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.86
|
|
|
$
|
16.77
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
15.24
|
|
|
$
|
18.97
|
|
|
$
|
15.10
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
15.18
|
|
|
$
|
17.68
|
|
|
$
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Twelve months ended
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
14.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
|
$
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)%
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
$
|
15.96
|
|
|
$
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)%
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
16.64
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
17.07
|
|
|
$
|
15.83
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in
the relevant quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset
value per share on the date of the high or low sales price. The
net asset values shown are based on outstanding shares at the
end of each period. |
On June 14, 2007, the last reported sales price of our
common stock was $18.68 per share. As of May 14, 2007, we
had approximately 18,600 stockholders of record.
34
General
Prospect Capital is a financial services company that lends and
invests in middle market privately-held or thinly traded public
companies. Prospect Capital, a Maryland corporation, was
organized on April 13, 2004 under the name Prospect
Street Energy Corporation and we changed our name to
Prospect Energy Corporation on June 23, 2004.
We changed our name again to Prospect Capital
Corporation in May 2007 and at the same time terminated
our policy of investing at least 80% of our net assets in energy
companies. We are a closed-end investment company that has filed
an election to be treated as a business development company
under the 1940 Act. Our headquarters are located at 10 East
40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, and
our telephone number is
(212) 448-0702.
Industry
Sectors
We invest in a range of industries, and many of our investments
have historically been, and we expect will continue to be, in
the energy industry. The energy industry consists of companies
in the direct energy value chain as well as companies that sell
products and services to, or acquire products and services from,
the direct energy value chain. In this prospectus, we refer to
all of these companies as energy companies and
assets in these companies as energy assets. The
categories of energy companies in this chain are described
below. The direct energy value chain broadly includes upstream
businesses, midstream businesses and downstream businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream businesses find, develop and extract energy resources,
including natural gas, crude oil, coal and agricultural
products, which are typically from geological reservoirs found
underground or offshore.
|
|
|
|
Midstream businesses gather, process, refine, store and transmit
energy resources and their byproducts in a form that is usable
by wholesale power generation, utility, petrochemical,
industrial and gasoline customers.
|
|
|
|
Downstream businesses include the power and electricity segment
as well as businesses that process, refine, market or distribute
hydrocarbons or other energy resources, such as customer-ready
natural gas, propane and gasoline, to end-user customers.
|
Our
Investment Objective and Policies
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and
long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity
investments. We focus on making investments in private and
microcap public companies, and many of our investments are in
energy companies. Prospect Capital is a non-diversified company
within the meaning of the 1940 Act.
We concentrate on making investments in companies having annual
revenues of less than $500 million and in transaction sizes
of less than $250 million, which we refer to as
target or middle market companies. In
most cases, these middle market companies are privately held or
have thinly traded public securities at the time we invest in
them.
We seek to maximize returns to our investors by applying
rigorous credit analysis and asset-based lending techniques to
make and monitor our investments. With respect to our
investments in energy companies, we do not invest directly in
any energy company exclusively involved in (1) speculative
oil and gas exploration, (2) speculative risks or
(3) speculative trading in oil, gas
and/or other
commodities. Some of the energy companies that we do invest in
are involved in some exploration or development activity. While
the structure of our investments vary, we invest primarily in
secured and unsecured senior and subordinated loans, generally
referred to as mezzanine loans, which often include equity
interests such as warrants or options received in connection
with these loans, and dividend-paying equity securities, such as
common and preferred stock and convertible securities, of target
companies. Our investments range between approximately
$5 million and $50 million each, although this
investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our
capital base changes.
35
While our primary focus is on seeking current income through
investment in the debt
and/or
dividend-paying equity securities of privately held or thinly
traded public companies and long-term capital appreciation by
acquiring accompanying warrants, options or other equity
securities of such companies, we may invest up to 30% of the
portfolio in opportunistic investments in order to seek enhanced
returns for stockholders. Such investments may include
investments in the debt and equity instruments of public
companies that are not thinly traded. We expect that these
public companies generally will have debt securities that are
non-investment grade. Within this 30% basket, we may also invest
in debt and equity securities of middle-market companies located
outside of the United States.
Our investments include other equity investments, such as
warrants, options to buy a minority interest in a portfolio
company, or contractual payment rights or rights to receive a
proportional interest in the operating cash flow or net income
of such company. When determined by the Investment Adviser to be
in our best interest, we acquire a controlling interest, in the
portfolio company. Any warrants we receive with our debt
securities may require only a nominal cost to exercise, and
thus, as a portfolio company appreciates in value, we may
achieve additional investment return from this equity interest.
We have structured, and will continue to structure, the warrants
to provide provisions protecting our rights as a
minority-interest or, if applicable, controlling-interest
holder, as well as puts, or rights to sell such securities back
to the company, upon the occurrence of specified events. In many
cases, we obtain registration rights in connection with these
equity interests, which may include demand and
piggyback registration rights.
We plan to hold most of our investments to maturity or
repayment, but will sell our investments earlier if a liquidity
event takes place, such as the sale or recapitalization of a
portfolio company.
We have qualified and elected to be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC,
we generally do not have to pay corporate-level federal income
taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute
to our stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a
RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income
and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In
addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to
our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our
investment company taxable income, which is
generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized
net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term
capital losses.
For a discussion of the risks inherent in our portfolio
investments, see Risk Factors Risks Related To
Our Investments.
The
Investment Adviser
Prospect Capital Management manages our investments as our
Investment Adviser. Prospect Capital Management is a Delaware
limited liability corporation that is registered as an
investment adviser under the Advisers Act since March 31,
2004. Under our Investment Advisory Agreement, we pay Prospect
Capital Management investment advisory fees, which consist of an
annual base management fee based on our gross assets as well as
a two-part incentive fee based on our performance.
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We may receive fees for
these services. Such fees would not qualify as good
income for purposes of the 90% income test that we must
meet each year to qualify as a RIC. Prospect Administration
provides such managerial assistance on our behalf to portfolio
companies when we are required to provide this assistance.
Staffing
Mr. John F. Barry III, our chairman and chief executive
officer, Mr. Grier Eliasek, our chief operating officer and
president, and Mr. William E. Vastardis, our chief
financial officer, treasurer, secretary and chief compliance
officer, comprise our senior management. Over time, we expect to
add additional officers and employees. Messrs. Barry and
Eliasek each also serves as an officer of Prospect
Administration and performs
36
his respective functions under the terms of the administration
agreement. Mr. Vastardis is the president of Vastardis
Capital Services, sub-administrator to the Company. Our
day-to-day investment operations are managed by our Investment
Adviser. In addition, we reimburse Prospect Administration for
our allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in performing
its obligations under the administration agreement, including
rent and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer (and treasurer),
chief operating officer (and president) and chief compliance
officer and their respective staffs. See
Management Administration Agreement.
Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties
materially important to our operation. Our corporate
headquarters are located at 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016, where we occupy an office
space pursuant to an administration agreement with Prospect
Administration.
Legal
Proceedings
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of
its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We intend to
defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that
resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Capital with a
complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District
for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP
alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Capital
breached its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered
with DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a
subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with
Prospect Capitals alleged agreement in September 2004 to
loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions,
Ltd. for approximately $26 million. The complaint seeks
relief not limited to $100 million. We believe that the DGP
complaint is frivolous and without merit, and intend to defend
the matter vigorously. On November 30, 2005,
U.S. Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division, issued a recommendation that the court grant
Prospect Capitals Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing
all claims by DGP. On February 21, 2006 the
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division issued an order granting Prospect
Capitals Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims
by Dallas Gas Partners, L.P. against Prospect Capital
Corporation. DGP has appealed this decision.
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a
complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging
discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress
and other claims. This former officer seeks economic
reinstatement and other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA
issued findings, including an order dismissing this complaint.
The complainant has filed written objections to the order and
had a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge on
March 16, 2006. On May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law
Judge issued a Decision and Order granting Summary Decision and
dismissing the Complaint. The Company does not believe that
these claims, even if ultimately resolved against the Company,
would be material. The Company believes the complaint is
frivolous and without merit and intends to defend itself
vigorously.
We are not aware of any other material pending legal proceeding,
and no such material proceedings are contemplated to which we
are a party or of which any of our property is subject.
37
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of
five directors, three of whom are not interested
persons of Prospect Capital as defined in
Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. We refer to these
individuals as our independent directors. Our Board of Directors
elects our officers to serve for a one-year term and until their
successors are duly elected and qualify, or until their earlier
removal or resignation.
Board Of
Directors And Executive Officers
Under our charter, our directors are divided into three classes.
Directors are elected for a staggered term of three years each,
with a term of office of one of the three classes of directors
expiring each year. At each annual meeting of our stockholders,
the successors to the class of directors whose terms expire at
such meeting are elected to hold office for a term expiring at
the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year
following the year of their election. Each director holds office
for the term to which he or she is elected and until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualifies.
Directors
and Executive Officers
Our directors and executive officers and their positions are set
forth below. The address for each director and executive officer
is
c/o Prospect
Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor,
New York, NY 10016.
Independent
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Held
|
|
Office(1) and
|
|
|
|
Fund Complex
|
|
Directorships
|
|
|
with the
|
|
Length of Time
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Held by
|
Name and Age
|
|
Company
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5 Years
|
|
Director
|
|
Director(2)
|
|
F. Lee Liebolt, Jr., 1941
|
|
Director
|
|
September 2006 to present
|
|
Lawyer in private practice. From
September 2005 to August 2006, he was senior counsel at Harkins
Cunningham LLP. Prior thereto, Mr. Liebolt practiced at
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP and certain predecessor
firms as a partner (1976 to 2002) and as senior counsel (January
2003 to August 2005).
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
William J. Gremp, 1942
|
|
Director
|
|
July 2006 to present
|
|
Merrill Lynch & Co. since 1999.
|
|
One
|
|
|
Walter V. E. Parker, 1947
|
|
Director
|
|
June 2004 to present
|
|
Executive Director of the Greenwich
Land Trust, Inc., a not-for-profit organization focused on the
preservation of open space since January 2005. From 1999 to
2004, Mr. Parker served as the founding principal of the
Sippican Group LLC, a financial advisory firm.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. Mr. Parker
and Mr. Liebolt are Class I directors with terms that
will expire in 2008, Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Gremp are
Class II directors with terms that will expire in 2009 and
Mr. Barry is a Class III director with a term that
will expire in 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
No director otherwise serves as a director of an investment
company subject to the 1940 Act. |
38
Interested
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Portfolios in
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Office(1)
|
|
|
|
Fund Complex
|
|
Directorships
|
|
|
Held with the
|
|
and Length of
|
|
|
|
Overseen by
|
|
Held by
|
Name and Age
|
|
Company
|
|
Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
|
Director
|
|
Director(2)
|
|
John F. Barry III(3) 1952
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
April 2004 to present
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Prospect Capital, Managing Director of Prospect since
1990; Managing Director of the Investment Committee of Prospect
Capital Management.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
M. Grier Eliasek(3)1973
|
|
Director, President and Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
June 2004 to present
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer of Prospect Capital, Managing Director of Prospect since
1999; Senior Professional of Prospect Capital Management.
|
|
One
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. Mr. Parker
and Mr. Liebolt are Class I directors with terms that
will expire in 2008, Mr. Eliasek and Mr. Gremp are
Class II directors with terms that will expire in 2009 and
Mr. Barry is a Class III director with a term that
will expire in 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
No director otherwise serves as a director of an investment
company subject to the 1940 Act. |
|
(3) |
|
Messrs. Barry and Eliasek are each considered an
interested person under the 1940 Act by virtue of
serving as one of our officers and having a relationship with
the Investment Adviser. |
Information
about Executive Officers who are not Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) Held with
|
|
Term of Office and
|
|
Principal Occupation(s) During
|
Name and Age
|
|
the Company
|
|
Length of Time Served
|
|
Past Five Years
|
|
William E. Vastardis, 1955
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
January 2005 to present as Chief
Compliance Officer and April 2005 to present as Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
Mr. Vastardis is a founder and
President of Vastardis Fund Services (formerly, EOS Fund
Services LLC) (Vastardis) and of Vastardis
Compliance Services LLC (formerly, EOS Compliance Services LLC)
(Vastardis Compliance). Mr. Vastardis founded
Vastardis in 2003 and Vastardis Compliance in June 2004.
Vastardis Compliance performs chief compliance officer services
for various registered investment companies and registered
investment advisers. Prior to founding Vastardis, he managed a
third-party fund administration firm, AMT Capital Services Inc.,
which was acquired by Investors Bank & Trust Company in
1998. Mr. Vastardis continued in the role of Managing Director
at the renamed Investors Capital Services until he departed in
2003 to found Vastardis.
|
39
Independent
Directors
William J. Gremp. Mr. Gremps career
as an investment banker, with over 30 years of corporate
finance experience in originating and executing transactions and
advisory assignments for energy and utility related clients, has
spanned years of significant change in the energy industry.
Since 1999, Mr. Gremp has been responsible for traditional
banking services, credit and lending, private equity and
corporate cash management with Merrill Lynch & Co.
From 1996 to 1999, he served at Wachovia as senior vice
president, managing director and co-founder of the utilities and
energy investment banking group, responsible for origination,
structuring, negotiation and successful completion of
transactions utilizing investment banking, capital markets and
traditional commercial banking products. From 1989 to 1996,
Mr. Gremp was the managing director of global power and
project finance at JPMorgan Chase & Co., where he was
responsible for the origination, delivery and successful
implementation of all corporate finance and investment banking
products and services to the utility and energy industries. He
advised clients on corporate strategy, project financing,
mergers and acquisitions and equity and lease finance. From 1970
to 1989, Mr. Gremp was with Merrill Lynch & Co.,
starting out as an associate in the mergers and acquisitions
department, then in 1986 becoming the senior vice president,
managing director and head of the regulated industries group.
From 1965 to 1970, Mr. Gremp served in roles at the United
States Army, the Mobil Oil Corporation and a New York management
consulting firm. Mr. Gremp received his MBA from New York
University and his Bachelor of Science degree from the
University of Minnesota.
F. Lee Liebolt, Jr. Mr. Liebolt
is a lawyer in private practice. From September 2005 to August
2006, he was senior counsel at Harkins Cunningham LLP. Prior
thereto, Mr. Liebolt practiced at Sidley Austin
Brown & Wood LLP and certain predecessor firms as a
partner (1976 to 2002) and as senior counsel (January 2003
to August 2005). Mr. Liebolt received his law degree from
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and his Bachelor
of Arts degree from the University of Pennsylvania.
Walter V. E. Parker. Mr. Parker has
35 years of experience in the energy and finance
industries. Mr. Parker currently serves as executive
director of the Greenwich Land Trust, Inc., a not for profit
organization focused on the preservation of open space since
January 2005. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Parker served as a
founding principal in the Sippican Group, LLC, a financial
advisory firm. While at Sippican, he advised clients on business
development, and financial matters. From 2000 to 2001,
Mr. Parker served as interim chief operating officer of
Avienda Technologies, Inc. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Parker
served as managing director of Claymore Partners, Inc., a
long-standing financial advisory firm addressing the needs of
troubled businesses. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Parker served
as a subsidiary board member and the credit officer at Parrish
Leasing and Finance Corporation, a joint venture with the
Travelers Group focused on large-scale project-based and
asset-based transactions. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Parker
served as vice president and senior credit officer of the
Corporate Finance Division for Xerox Credit, Inc., which
provided project finance, equipment leasing, high-yield
corporate debt, secured loans, and real estate financing to a
diverse group of US and international companies, including
energy companies. Mr. Parker received Xeroxs
Presidents Award for timely achievement of liquidity and
value enhancement goals. From 1989 to 1991, Mr. Parker was
a vice president for the Project and Lease Finance Group of
Kidder Peabody & Co., where he focused on energy
transactions. From 1971 to 1989, Mr. Parker served in
several roles, including as a senior credit officer, at
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and the United States
Trust Company of New York. Mr. Parker is a graduate of
the Xerox Advanced Management School and the American Management
Associations Time Based Accounting series. Mr. Parker
received his MBA from Columbia University, where he received
honors ratings for course work in banking and finance, and his
Bachelor of Arts degree from Colgate University.
Interested
Directors
John F. Barry III. Mr. Barry is chairman
and chief executive officer of Prospect Capital and is a control
person of Prospect Capital Management and a managing director of
Prospect Administration. Mr. Barry is chairman of
Prospects investment committee and has been an officer of
Prospect since 1990. In addition to overseeing Prospect,
Mr. Barry has served on the boards of directors of twelve
private and public Prospect portfolio companies. Mr. Barry
has served on the board of advisors of USEC Inc., a publicly
traded energy company. Mr. Barry has served as chairman and
chief executive officer of Bondnet Trading Systems. From
40
1988 to 1989, Mr. Barry managed the investment bank of L.F.
Rothschild & Company, focusing on private equity and
debt financings for energy and other companies. From 1983 to
1988, Mr. Barry was a senior investment and merchant banker
at Merrill Lynch & Co., where he was a founding member
of the project finance group, executing more than
$4 billion in energy and other financings. From 1979 to
1983, Mr. Barry was a corporate securities attorney at
Davis Polk & Wardwell, where he advised energy
companies and their commercial and investment bankers. From 1978
to 1979, Mr. Barry served as law clerk to Circuit Judge,
formerly Chief Judge, J. Edward Lumbard of the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City.
Mr. Barry is chairman of the board of directors of the
Mathematics Foundation of America, a non-profit foundation which
enhances opportunities in mathematics education for students
from diverse backgrounds. Mr. Barry received his JD cum
laude from Harvard Law School, where he was an editor of the
Harvard Law Review, and his Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude
from Princeton University, where he was a University Scholar.
M. Grier Eliasek. Mr. Eliasek is
president and chief operating officer of Prospect Capital and a
managing director of Prospect Capital Management and Prospect
Administration. At Prospect Capital, Mr. Eliasek is
responsible for various administrative and investment management
functions and leads and supervises other Prospect professionals
in origination and assessment of investments. Mr. Eliasek
has served as a senior investment professional at Prospect since
1999. Prior to joining Prospect, Mr. Eliasek assisted the
chief financial officer of Amazon.com in 1999 in corporate
strategy, customer acquisition, and new product launches. From
1995 to 1998, Mr. Eliasek served as a consultant with
Bain & Company, a global strategy consulting firm,
where he managed engagements for companies in several different
industries. At Bain, Mr. Eliasek analyzed new lines of
businesses, developed market strategies, revamped sales
organizations and improved operational performance.
Mr. Eliasek received his MBA from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Eliasek received his Bachelor of Science in Chemical
Engineering with Highest Distinction from the University of
Virginia, where he was a Jefferson Scholar and a Rodman Scholar.
Executive
Officer
William E. Vastardis. Mr. Vastardis is
chief compliance officer, chief financial officer and treasurer
and secretary of Prospect Capital. Mr. Vastardis is a
founder and president of Vastardis and of Vastardis Compliance.
Vastardis serves as the Companys sub-administrator.
Mr. Vastardis founded Vastardis in August 2003 and
Vastardis Compliance in June 2004. Vastardis Compliance performs
chief compliance officer services for various registered
investment companies and registered Investment Advisers. Prior
to founding Vastardis, he managed a third-party fund
administration firm, AMT Capital Services Inc., which was
acquired by Investors Bank & Trust Company in
1998. Mr. Vastardis continued in the role of managing
director at the renamed Investors Capital Services until he
departed in 2003 to found Vastardis.
For information on the investment professionals of Prospect
Capital Management, see Investment Advisory
Agreement Investment personnel.
Committees
Of The Board Of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee and a
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2006, the Board of Directors of the
Company held sixteen Board meetings, nine Audit Committee
meetings, and three Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the
aggregate number of meetings of the Board and of the respective
committees on which they served. The Company requires each
director to make a diligent effort to attend all board and
committee meetings, as well as each annual meeting of
stockholders.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates
pursuant to a charter approved by the Board of Directors. The
charter sets forth the responsibilities of the Audit Committee,
which include selecting or retaining each year an independent
registered public accounting firm (the independent
accountants) to audit the accounts and records of the
Company; reviewing and discussing with management and the
independent accountants the annual audited financial statements
of the Company, including disclosures made in managements
discussion and analysis, and recommending to the Board of
Directors whether the audited
41
financial statements should be included in the Companys
annual report on
Form 10-K;
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
accountants the Companys quarterly financial statements
prior to the filings of its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q;
pre-approving the independent accountants engagement to
render audit
and/or
permissible non-audit services; and evaluating the
qualifications, performance and independence of the independent
accountants. The Audit Committee is presently composed of three
persons: Messrs. Gremp, Liebolt, and Parker, all of whom
are not interested persons as defined in the 1940
Act and are considered independent under the National
Association of Securities Dealers Marketplace Rules (the
NASD Marketplace Rules). The Companys Board of
Directors has determined that Mr. Parker is an audit
committee financial expert as that term is defined under
Item 401 of
Regulation S-K.
The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval
responsibilities to one or more of its members. The members to
whom such responsibility is delegated must report, for
informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the
Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The function of the Audit Committee is oversight. Management of
the Company is primarily responsible for maintaining appropriate
systems for accounting and financial reporting principles and
policies and internal controls and procedures that provide for
compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and
regulations. The independent accountants are primarily
responsible for planning and carrying out a proper audit of the
Companys annual financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting standards. The independent
accountants are accountable to the Board of Directors and the
Audit Committee, as representatives of the Companys
shareholders. The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee
have the ultimate authority and responsibility to select,
evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the Companys
independent accountants (subject, if applicable, to shareholder
ratification).
In fulfilling their responsibilities, it is recognized that
members of the Audit Committee are not full-time employees of
the Company or management and are not, and do not represent
themselves to be, accountants or auditors by profession. As
such, it is not the duty or the responsibility of the Audit
Committee or its members to conduct field work or
other types of auditing or accounting reviews or procedures, to
determine that the financial statements are complete and
accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, or to set auditor independence standards.
Each member of the Audit Committee is entitled to rely on
(a) the integrity of those persons within and outside the
Company and management from which it receives information;
(b) the accuracy of the financial and other information
provided to the Audit Committee absent actual knowledge to the
contrary (which is required to be promptly reported to the Board
of Directors); and (c) statements made by the officers and
employees of the Company, its Investment Adviser or other third
parties as to any information technology, internal audit and
other non-audit services provided by the independent accountants
to the Company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee (the Nominating and Governance
Committee) is responsible for selecting qualified nominees
to be elected to the Board of Directors by stockholders;
selecting qualified nominees to fill any vacancies on the Board
of Directors or a committee thereof; developing and recommending
to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance
principles applicable to the Company; overseeing the evaluation
of the Board of Directors and management; and undertaking such
other duties and responsibilities as may from time to time be
delegated by the Board of Directors to the Nominating and
Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is
presently composed of three persons: Messrs. Gremp, Liebolt
and Parker, all of whom are not interested persons
as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. The
Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a written
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider
stockholder recommendations for possible nominees for election
as directors when such recommendations are submitted in
accordance with the Companys bylaws and any applicable
law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations.
Nominations should be sent to William E. Vastardis, Secretary,
Prospect Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street,
44th Floor, New York, NY 10016. When submitting a
nomination to the Company for consideration, a stockholder must
provide all information that would be required under applicable
SEC rules to be disclosed in connection with election of a
director, including the following minimum information for each
director nominee: full name, age and address; principal
occupation during the past five years; current directorships on
publicly held companies
42
and investment companies; number of shares of Company common
stock owned, if any; and, a written consent of the individual to
stand for election if nominated by the Board of Directors and to
serve if elected by the stockholders. Criteria considered by the
Nominating and Governance Committee in evaluating the
qualifications of individuals for election as members of the
Board of Directors include compliance with the independence and
other applicable requirements of the NASD Marketplace Rules and
the 1940 Act and all other applicable laws, rules, regulations
and listing standards, the criteria, policies and principles set
forth in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Charter, and the ability to contribute to the effective
management of the Company, taking into account the needs of the
Company and such factors as the individuals experience,
perspective, skills and knowledge of the industry in which the
Company operates. The Nominating and Governance Committee also
may consider such other factors as it may deem are in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board of
Directors also believes it is appropriate for certain key
members of the Companys management to participate as
members of the Board of Directors.
Corporate
Governance
Corporate Governance Guidelines. Upon the
recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the
Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines
on behalf of the Company. These Corporate Governance Guidelines
address, among other things, the following key corporate
governance topics: director responsibilities; the size,
composition, and membership criteria of the Board of Directors;
composition and responsibilities of directors serving on
committees of the Board of Directors; director access to
officers, employees, and independent advisors; director
orientation and continuing education; director compensation; and
an annual performance evaluation of the Board of Directors.
Code of Conduct. The Company has adopted a
code of conduct which applies to, among others, its senior
officers, including its chief executive officer and its chief
financial officer, as well as every employee of the Company. The
Companys code of conduct is attached as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC, and can be accessed via the Internet site of
the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
The Company intends to disclose amendments to or waivers from a
required provision of the code of conduct on
Form 8-K.
Code of Ethics. The Company and PCM have each
adopted a code of ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal
investments and restricts certain personal securities
transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in
securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such
investments are made in accordance with the codes
requirements.
Internal Reporting and Whistle Blower Protection
Policy. The Companys Audit Committee has
established guidelines and procedures regarding the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters (collectively,
Accounting Matters), and the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters. Persons with
complaints or concerns regarding Accounting Matters may submit
their complaints to the Companys chief compliance officer
(CCO). Persons who are uncomfortable submitting
complaints to the CCO, including complaints involving the CCO,
may submit complaints directly to the Companys Audit
Committee Chairman (together with the CCO, Complaint
Officers). Complaints may be submitted on an anonymous
basis.
The CCO may be contacted at Prospect Capital Corporation, Chief
Compliance Officer, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor,
New York, NY 10016.
The Audit Committee Chairman may be contacted at Walter V.E.
Parker, Prospect Capital Corporation, Audit Committee Chairman,
10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
43
Proxy
Voting Policies And Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to the
Investment Adviser. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by
Prospect Capital Management and our non-interested directors,
and, accordingly, are subject to change. See
Regulation Proxy Voting Policies and
Procedures.
Compensation
of Directors and Officers
The following table shows information regarding the compensation
received by the independent directors and officers for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. No compensation is paid to
directors who are interested persons, as that term
is defined in the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part
|
|
|
Total Compensation from
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Compensation
|
|
|
of Company
|
|
|
Company and Fund Complex
|
|
Name
|
|
from the Company
|
|
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
Paid to Director
|
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael E. Basham(2)
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Robert A. Davidson(2)
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
William J. Gremp(2)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
F. Lee Liebolt, Jr.(2)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Walter V. Parker
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Barry III
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Vastardis(3)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We do not have a bonus, profit sharing or retirement plan, and
directors do not receive any pension or retirement benefits. |
|
(2) |
|
Messrs. Gremp and Liebolt were elected as directors after
June 30, 2006. Messrs. Basham and Davidson resigned as
directors after June 30, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Vastardis has served as chief compliance officer since
January 4, 2005, and as chief financial officer, treasurer
and secretary since April 30, 2005. |
|
(4) |
|
The compensation of William E. Vastardis for his service as
chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary of the Company
is paid by Vastardis, sub-administrator to the Company.
Vastardis is in turn paid by the Company at a monthly rate of
$18,750. The compensation of William E. Vastardis for his
service as chief compliance officer of the Company is paid by
Vastardis Compliance. Vastardis Compliance is in turn paid by
the Company at a monthly rate of $6,250. In addition, the
Company pays Vastardis Compliance for certain other services at
the rate of $270 per hour. Both Vastardis and Vastardis
Compliance determines the compensation to be paid to
Mr. Vastardis with respect to the Company based on a
case-by-case
evaluation of the time and resources that is required to fulfill
his duties to the Company. For the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006, the Company paid Vastardis Compliance
approximately $75,000 for services rendered by
Mr. Vastardis as chief compliance officer from
January 4, 2005 through June 30, 2006. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2006, the Company paid Vastardis
approximately $37,500 for services rendered by
Mr. Vastardis as chief financial officer, treasurer and
secretary from April 30, 2005 through June 30, 2006. |
The independent directors receive an annual fee of $70,000 plus
reimbursement of any reasonable out- of-pocket expenses
incurred. The chairman of each committee also receives an
additional annual fee of $5,000.
44
Management
services
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Capital has entered into an Investment Advisory
Agreement with Prospect Capital Management under which Prospect
Capital Management, as investment adviser, subject to the
overall supervision of Prospect Capitals Board of
Directors, will manage the day-to-day operations of, and provide
investment advisory services to, Prospect Capital. Under the
terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Investment
Adviser: (i) determines the composition of our portfolio,
the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the
manner of implementing such changes, (ii) identifies,
evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we
make (including performing due diligence on our prospective
portfolio companies); and (iii) closes and monitors
investments we make.
Prospect Capital Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from Prospect Capital, consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of
2.00% on Prospect Capitals gross assets (including amounts
borrowed). For services rendered under the Investment Advisory
Agreement during the period commencing from the closing of
Prospect Capitals initial public offering through and
including the first six months of operations, the base
management fee was payable monthly in arrears. For services
currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the
base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base
management fee is calculated based on the average value of
Prospect Capitals gross assets at the end of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters (the closing of Prospect
Capitals initial public offering was treated as a quarter
end for these purposes) and appropriately adjusted for any share
issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
Base management fees for any partial month or quarter are
appropriately pro rated. The total base management fees earned
by and paid to Prospect Capital Management during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 were
$1.531 million and $0.521 million, respectively, and
during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006 were $3.715 million and
$1.554 million, respectively.
Our investment advisory fees were $3.3 million,
$7.4 million and $3.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, for the nine months ended
March 31, 2007 and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006, respectively. The Income Incentive fees were
$1.8 million, none, $3.7 million and $1.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007, for the nine
months ended March 31, 2007, and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively. At March 31, 2007
the Company owed the Investment Adviser $3.5 million in
advisory fees and reimbursements.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income for the immediately preceding calendar
quarter. For this purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment
income means interest income, dividend income and any other
income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing
managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination,
structuring, diligence and consulting fees and other fees that
Prospect Capital receives from portfolio companies) accrued
during the calendar quarter, minus Prospect Capitals
operating expenses for the quarter (including the base
management fee, expenses payable under the Administration
Agreement described below, and any interest expense and
dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock,
but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net
investment income includes, in the case of investments with a
deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt
instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon
securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in
cash. Thus, if we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay
this incentive fee or distributions to stockholders on such
accrued income, we may be required to liquidate assets in order
to do so. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not
include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or
unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive
fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the
value of Prospect Capitals net assets at the end of the
immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
45
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. Prospect
Capital pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
(1) no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which
Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net investment income
does not exceed the hurdle rate; (2) 100.00% of Prospect
Capitals pre-incentive fee net investment income with
respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment
income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than
125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized with the 7.00% annualized hurdle rate); and
(3) 20.00% of the amount of Prospect Capitals
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
125.00% of the quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter
(8.75% annualized with the 7.00% annualized hurdle rate). These
calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of less
than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of Prospect Capitals realized capital gains for the
calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such
year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital calculates the
aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital
losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as
applicable, with respect to each of the investments in its
portfolio. For this purpose, aggregate realized capital gains,
if any, equals the sum of the differences between the net sales
price of each investment, when sold, and the original cost of
such investment since inception. Aggregate realized capital
losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the net sales price
of each investment, when sold, is less than the original cost of
such investment since inception. Aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation equals the sum of the difference, if negative,
between the valuation of each investment as of the applicable
date and the original cost of such investment. At the end of the
applicable period, the amount of capital gains that serves as
the basis for Prospect Capitals calculation of the capital
gains incentive fee equals the aggregate realized capital gains
less aggregate realized capital losses and less aggregate
unrealized capital depreciation with respect to its portfolio of
investments. If this number is positive at the end of such
period, then the capital gains incentive fee for such period is
equal to 20.00% of such amount, less the aggregate amount of any
capital gains incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in
all prior periods.
$1.754 million and $0.533 million in income incentive
fees were earned for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and March 31, 2006, respectively, and $3.695 million
and $1.041 million in income incentive fees were earned for
the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31,
2006, respectively. No capital gains incentive fees were earned
for the three or nine months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006.
Because of the structure of the incentive fee, it is possible
that we may have to pay an incentive fee in a quarter where we
incur a loss. For example, if we receive pre-incentive fee net
investment income in excess of the hurdle rate for a quarter, we
will pay the applicable income incentive fee even if we have
incurred a loss in that quarter due to realized or unrealized
losses on our investments. The Investment Adviser has
voluntarily agreed to cause 30% of any incentive fee that it is
paid to be invested in shares of our common stock through an
independent trustee. Any sales of such stock will comply with
any applicable six month holding period under Section 16(b)
of the Securities Act and all other restrictions contained in
any law or regulation, to the fullest extent applicable to any
such sale. Any change in this voluntary agreement will not be
implemented without at least 90 days prior notice to
stockholders and compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations.
Examples
of Quarterly Incentive Fee Calculation
Example
1: Income Incentive Fee (*):
Alternative
1
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
1.25%
46
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment
income (base management fee + other expenses)) =
0.55%
Pre-incentive net investment income does not exceed hurdle rate,
therefore there is no income incentive fee.
Alternative
2
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
2.70%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50%
Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent,
etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment
income (base management fee + other expenses)) =
2.00%
Pre-incentive net investment income exceeds hurdle rate,
therefore there is an income incentive fee payable by us to our
Investment Adviser.
Income incentive Fee = 100% × Catch Up + the
greater of 0% AND (20% × (pre-incentive fee net investment
income - 2.1875%)
= (100% × (2.00% 1.75%)) + 0%
= 100% × 0.25% + 0%
= 0.25%
Alternative
3
Assumptions
Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) =
3.00%
Hurdle rate(1) = 1.75%
Base management fee(2) = 0.50% Other expenses (legal,
accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.20%
Pre-incentive fee net investment income (investment
income (base management fee + other expenses)) =
2.30%
Pre-incentive net investment income exceeds hurdle rate,
therefore there is an income incentive fee payable by us to our
Investment Adviser.
Income incentive Fee = 100% × Catch Up + the
greater of 0% AND (20% × (pre-incentive fee net investment
income 2.1875%)
= (100% × (2.1875% 1.75%)) + the greater of 0%
AND (20% × (2.30% 2.1875%))
= (100% × 0.4375%) + (20% × 0.1125%)
= 0.4375% + 0.0225% = 0.46%
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 7% annualized hurdle rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 2% annualized base management fee. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes organizational and offering expenses. |
|
(*) |
|
The hypothetical amount of pre-incentive fee net investment
income shown is based on a percentage of total net assets. |
47
Example
2: Capital Gains Incentive Fee:
Alternative
1
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Fair market value (FMV) of investment
determined to be $22 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of investment determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Investment sold for $21 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Reduce base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by the realized gain of
$1 million based on the sale at $21 million plus that
portion, if any, of the $3 million unrealized loss in year
3 that was used to reduce the incentive fee paid in year 3.
|
Alternative
2
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of investment determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of investment determined to be $17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: FMV of investment determined to be $21 million
|
|
|
|
Year 5: FMV of investment determined to be $18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 6: Investment sold for $15 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Reduce base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 4: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 5: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 6: Reduce base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $2 million plus the amount,
if any, of the unrealized capital depreciation from Year 2 that
did not actually reduce the incentive fee that would otherwise
have been payable to the Investment Adviser in prior years
|
Alternative
3
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made in company A
(Investment A), and $20 million investment made
in company B (Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$21 million, and Investment B is sold for $18 million
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Investment A is sold for $23 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Reduce base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $2 million (realized capital
loss on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (realized capital
gain on Investment A)
|
Alternative
4
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: $20 million investment made in company A
(Investment A), and $20 million investment made
in company B (Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 2: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$21 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$17 million
|
|
|
|
Year 3: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$18 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$18 million
|
|
|
|
Year 4: FMV of Investment A is determined to be
$19 million, and FMV of Investment B is determined to be
$21 million
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Investment A is sold for $17 million, and
Investment B is sold for $23 million
|
The impact, if any, on the capital gains portion of the
incentive fee would be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year 1: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 2: Reduce base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $3 million (unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment B)
|
|
|
|
Year 3: Reduce base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $2 million (unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment A)
|
|
|
|
Year 4: No impact
|
|
|
|
Year 5: Increase base amount on which the second part of the
incentive fee is calculated by $5 million ($6 million
of realized capital gain on Investment B partially offset by
$1 million of realized capital loss on Investment
A) less the amount, if any, of the unrealized capital
depreciation on Investment A from Year 3 and the unrealized
capital depreciation on Investment B from Year 2 that did not
actually reduce the incentive fees that would otherwise have
been payable to the Investment Adviser in prior years.
|
Payment
of our expenses
All investment professionals of the Investment Adviser and their
respective staffs, when and to the extent engaged in providing
investment advisory and management services, and the
compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel
allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by
Prospect Capital Management. We bear all other costs and
expenses of our operations and transactions, including those
relating to: organization and offering; calculation of our net
asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent
valuation firm); expenses incurred by Prospect Capital
Management payable to third parties, including agents,
consultants or other advisors (such as independent valuation
firms, accountants and legal counsel), in monitoring our
financial and legal affairs and in monitoring our investments
and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio
companies; interest payable on debt, if any, and dividends
payable on preferred stock, if any, incurred to finance our
investments; offerings of our debt, our preferred shares, our
49
common stock and other securities; investment advisory fees;
fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or
other advisors, relating to, or associated with, evaluating and
making investments; transfer agent and custodial fees;
registration fees; listing fees; taxes; independent
directors fees and expenses; costs of preparing and filing
reports or other documents with the SEC; the costs of any
reports, proxy statements or other notices to stockholders,
including printing costs; our allocable portion of the fidelity
bond, directors and officers/errors and omissions liability
insurance, and any other insurance premiums; direct costs and
expenses of administration, including auditor and legal costs;
and all other expenses incurred by us, by our Investment Adviser
or by Prospect Administration in connection with administering
our business, such as our allocable portion of overhead under
the administration agreement, including rent and our allocable
portion of the costs of our chief compliance officer and chief
financial officer and their respective staffs under the
sub-administration agreement, as further described below.
Duration
and termination
The Investment Advisory Agreement was originally approved by our
Board of Directors on June 23, 2004 and continued for an
additional one year term expiring June 23, 2007 on
May 15, 2006. Unless terminated earlier as described below,
it will continue in effect for a period of two years from its
effective date. It will remain in effect from year to year
thereafter if approved annually by our Board of Directors or by
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our
outstanding voting securities, including, in either case,
approval by a majority of our directors who are not interested
persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically
terminate in the event of its assignment. The Investment
Advisory Agreement may be terminated by either party without
penalty upon not more than 60 days written notice to
the other. See Risk Factors Risks relating to
our business and structure We are dependent upon
Prospect Capital Managements key management personnel for
our future success.
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Capital has also entered into an administration
agreement with Prospect Administration under which Prospect
Administration, among other things, provides administrative
services and facilities for Prospect Capital. Prospect
Administration has engaged Vastardis to serve as
sub-administrator of Prospect Capital. For providing these
services, Prospect Capital reimburses Prospect Administration
for Prospect Capitals allocable portion of overhead
incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the administration agreement, including rent,
the fees of the sub-administrator for services provided with
respect to Prospect Capital and Prospect Capitals
allocable portion of the compensation of its chief compliance
officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs.
Prospect Administration also provides on Prospect Capitals
behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies to
which Prospect Capital is required to provide such assistance.
Under this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with
office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and
record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect
Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of,
our required administrative services, which include, among other
things, being responsible for the financial records which we are
required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders
and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect
Administration assists us in determining and publishing our net
asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax
returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to us by others. Prospect Administration also provides
on our behalf managerial assistance to those portfolio companies
to which we are required to provide such assistance. The
administration agreement may be terminated by either party
without penalty upon 60 days written notice to the
other party. Prospect Administration is a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Investment Adviser.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our board
of directors, has engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC
(Vastardis) to serve as the sub-administrator of
Prospect Capital to perform certain services required of
Prospect Administration. This engagement began in May 2005 and
ran on a month-to-month basis at the rate of $250,000 annually,
payable monthly. Under the sub-administration agreement,
Vastardis provides Prospect Capital with office facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping
50
services at such facilities. Vastardis also conducts relations
with custodians, depositories, transfer agents, dividend
disbursing agents, other stockholder servicing agents,
accountants, attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers,
corporate fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in
any such other capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable.
Vastardis provides reports to the Administrator and the
Directors of its performance of obligations and furnishes advice
and recommendations with respect to such other aspects of the
business and affairs of Prospect Capital as it shall determine
to be desirable. Under the revised and renewed
sub-administration agreement, Vastardis also provides the
service of William E. Vastardis as the Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) of the Fund. This service was formerly
provided at the rate of $225,000 annually, payable monthly. In
May 2006, the engagement was revised and renewed as an
asset-based fee with a $400,000 annual minimum, payable monthly.
Currently, Vastardis receives approximately $575,000 annually
under this engagement. Vastardis does not provide any advice or
recommendation relating to the securities and other assets that
Prospect Capital should purchase, retain or sell or any other
investment advisory services to Prospect Capital. Vastardis is
responsible for the financial and other records that either
Prospect Capital (or the Administrator on behalf of Prospect
Capital) is required to maintain and prepares reports to
stockholders, and reports and other materials filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, Vastardis
assists Prospect Capital in determining and publishing Prospect
Capitals net asset value, overseeing the preparation and
filing of Prospect Capitals tax returns, and the printing
and dissemination of reports to stockholders of Prospect
Capital, and generally overseeing the payment of Prospect
Capitals expenses and the performance of administrative
and professional services rendered to Prospect Capital by others.
The Company reimbursed Prospect Administration
$0.314 million, $0.071 million, $0.526 million,
$0.148 million and $0.310 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, for the nine months ended March 31,
2007, for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 and for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, for
services it provided to Prospect Capital at cost. The Company
also reimbursed Prospect Administration for certain expenses
which Prospect Administration initially funded on behalf of the
Company. At March 31, 2007, the Company was owed
$0.028 million for tax compliance fees and miscellaneous
expenses that it paid on behalf of Prospect Administration.
Indemnification
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of
its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties
and obligations, Prospect Capital Management and its officers,
managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Capital for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Capital Managements
services under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as
the Investment Adviser of Prospect Capital.
The administration agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Capital for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administrations
services under the administration agreement or otherwise as
administrator for Prospect Capital.
Under the sub-administration agreement, Vastardis and its
officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons,
members and any other person or entity affiliated with
Vastardis, is not liable to the Administrator or Prospect for
any action taken or omitted to be taken by Vastardis in
connection with the performance of any of its duties or
obligations or otherwise as sub-administrator for the
Administrator on behalf of Prospect Capital. The agreement also
provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of Vastardis duties or by
reason of the reckless disregard of Vastardis duties and
obligations, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or
entity affiliated with Vastardis is entitled to indemnification
from the Administrator and Prospect Capital. All damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and
51
amounts reasonably paid in settlement) incurred in or by reason
of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit,
investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit
by or in the right of the Administrator or Prospect Capital or
the security holders of Prospect Capital) arising out of or
otherwise based upon the performance of any of Vastardis
duties or obligations under the agreement or otherwise as
sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf of Prospect
Capital.
Board
approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement
On June 18, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company
voted unanimously to renew the Investment Advisory Agreement for
the one year period beginning June 24, 2007. In its
consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board of
Directors focused on information it had received relating to,
among other things: (a) the nature, quality and extent of
the advisory and other services to be provided to us by the
Investment Adviser; (b) comparative data with respect to
advisory fees or expense ratios paid by other business
development companies with similar investment objectives;
(c) our projected operating expenses; (d) the
projected profitability of the Investment Adviser and any
existing and potential sources of indirect income to the
Investment Adviser or Prospect Administration from their
relationships with us and the profitability of those
relationships; (e) information about the services to be
performed and the personnel performing such services under the
Investment Advisory Agreement; (f) the organizational
capability and financial condition of the Investment Adviser and
its affiliates and (g) the possibility of obtaining similar
services from other third party service providers or through an
internally managed structure. In approving the renewal of the
Investment Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors, including
all of the directors who are not interested persons,
considered the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The
Board of Directors considered the nature, extent and quality of
the investment selection process employed by the Investment
Adviser. The Board of Directors also considered the Investment
Advisers personnel and their prior experience in
connection with the types of investments made by us. The Board
of Directors concluded that the services to be provided under
the Investment Advisory Agreement are generally the same as
those of comparable business development companies described in
the available market data.
|
|
|
|
Investment Performance. The Board of Directors
reviewed the investment performance of the Company as well as
comparative data with respect to the investment performance of
other externally managed business development companies. The
Board of Directors concluded that the Investment Adviser was
delivering results consistent with the investment objective of
the Company and that its investment performance was satisfactory
when compared to comparable business development companies.
|
|
|
|
The reasonableness of the fees paid to the Investment
Adviser. The Board of Directors considered
comparative data based on publicly available information on
other business development companies with respect to services
rendered and the advisory fees (including the management fees
and incentive fees) of other business development companies as
well as our projected operating expenses and expense ratio
compared to other business development companies. The Board of
Directors and the Company also considered the profitability of
the Investment Adviser. Based upon its review, the Board of
Directors concluded that the fees to be paid under the
Investment Advisory Agreement are reasonable compared to other
business development companies.
|
|
|
|
Economies of Scale. The Board of Directors
considered information about the potential of the Investment
Adviser to realize economies of scale in managing our assets,
and determined that at this time there were not economies of
scale to be realized by the Investment Adviser.
|
Based on the information reviewed and the discussions detailed
above, the Board of Directors (including all of the directors
who are not interested persons) concluded that the
investment advisory fee rates and terms are fair and reasonable
in relation to the services provided and approved the renewal of
the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Investment Adviser as
being in the best interests of the company and its stockholders.
52
Portfolio
Managers
The following individuals function as portfolio managers
primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Companys portfolio. The Companys portfolio managers
are not responsible for day-to-day management of any other
accounts. For a description of their principal occupations for
the past five years, see above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Length of Service
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
with Company(Years)
|
|
|
John F. Barry
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
3
|
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer
|
|
|
3
|
|
Mr. Eliasek receives no compensation from Prospect Capital.
Mr. Eliasek receives a salary and bonus from Prospect that
takes into account his role as a senior officer of Prospect and
of Prospect Capital, his performance and the performance of each
of Prospect and Prospect Capital. Mr. Barry receives no
compensation from Prospect Capital. Mr. Barry, as the sole
member of Prospect Capital Management, receives no salary or
bonus from Prospect Capital Management but is entitled to equity
distributions after all other obligations are met.
The following table sets forth the dollar range of common stock
of the Company beneficially owned by each of the portfolio
managers described above as of March 2, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
Name
|
|
Beneficially Owned by Manager
|
|
John F. Barry
|
|
Over $100,000
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. The Company received
$193,000 and $392,000 in managerial assistance for the three
months and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007
respectively. These fees are paid to the Administrator.
License
Agreement
We entered into a license agreement with Prospect Capital
Management, pursuant to which Prospect Capital Management agreed
to grant us a nonexclusive, royalty free license to use the name
Prospect Capital. Under this agreement, we have a
right to use the Prospect Capital name, for so long as Prospect
Capital Management or one of its affiliates remains our
Investment Adviser. Other than with respect to this limited
license, we have no legal right to the Prospect Capital name.
This license agreement will remain in effect for so long as the
Investment Advisory Agreement with our Investment Adviser is in
effect.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with
Prospect Capital Management. Our chairman of the board is the
sole member of and controls Prospect Capital Management. Our
senior management may in the future also serve as principals of
other investment managers affiliated with Prospect Capital
Management that may in the future manage investment funds with
investment objectives similar to ours. In addition, our
directors and executive officers and the principals of our
Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital Management, may serve as
officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in
the same or related lines of business as we do or of investment
funds managed by affiliates. Accordingly, we may not be given
the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by
investment funds managed by advisers affiliated with Prospect
Capital Management. However, our Investment Adviser and other
members of Prospect
53
intend to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and
equitable manner consistent with our investment objectives and
strategies so that we are not disadvantaged in relation to any
other client. See Risk Factors Risks relating
to our business and structure There are significant
potential conflicts of interest which could impact our
investment returns.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the administration
agreement, Prospect Administration provides, or arranges to
provide, us with the office facilities and administrative
services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations.
Prospect Capital Management, our investment adviser, is the sole
member of and controls Prospect Administration. Prospect
Administration, pursuant to the approval of our Board of
Directors, has engaged Vastardis to serve as the
sub-administrator of the Company. Our chief financial officer,
treasurer, secretary and chief compliance officer is the founder
and president of Vastardis.
We have no intention of investing in any portfolio company in
which Prospect or any affiliate currently has an investment.
CONTROL
PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
As of March 2, 2007, there were no persons that owned 25%
or more of our outstanding voting securities, and no person
would be deemed to control us, as such term is defined in the
1940 Act.
The following table sets forth, as of March 2, 2007,
certain ownership information with respect to our common stock
for those persons who directly or indirectly own, control or
hold with the power to vote, 5% or more of our outstanding
common stock and all officers and directors, as a group. Unless
otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners set
forth in the tables below have sole voting and investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Type of Ownership
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
Prospect Capital Management, LLC(2)
|
|
Record and beneficial
|
|
|
137,968,348
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All officers and directors as a
group (7 persons)(3)
|
|
Record and beneficial
|
|
|
291,589,335
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Does not reflect shares of common stock reserved for issuance
upon any exercise of any underwriters overallotment option. |
|
(2) |
|
John F. Barry is a control person of Prospect Capital
Management, LLC. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents shares of common stock held by Prospect Capital
Management, LLC. Because John F. Barry controls Prospect Capital
Management, LLC, he may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of
shares of our common stock held by Prospect Capital Management,
LLC. The address for all officers and directors is
c/o Prospect
Capital Corporation, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York,
NY 10016. |
54
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the dollar range of our equity
securities beneficially owned by each of our directors and
officers as of March 2, 2007. We are not part of a
family of investment companies as that term is
defined in the 1940 Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of
|
|
|
Equity Securities in
|
Name of Director or Officer
|
|
the Company(2)
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
F. Lee Liebolt, Jr
|
|
$1-10,000
|
William J. Gremp
|
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Walter V. Parker
|
|
$1-10,000
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
John F. Barry III(1)
|
|
Over $100,000
|
M. Grier Eliasek
|
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Officer
|
|
|
William E. Vastardis
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents an indirect beneficial ownership in shares of our
common stock, that are beneficially owned directly by Prospect
Capital Management, by reason of Mr. Barrys position
as a control person of Prospect Capital Management. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar ranges are as follows: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000 or over $100,000. |
The following is a listing of our portfolio companies at
March 31, 2007. Values are as of March 31, 2007.
The portfolio companies are presented in three categories:
companies more than 25% owned are portfolio
companies in which we directly or indirectly own more than 25%
of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and, therefore, are presumed to be controlled by us under the
1940 Act; companies owned 5% to 25% are portfolio
companies where we directly or indirectly own 5% to 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company
and/or hold
one or more seats on the portfolio companys Board of
Directors and, therefore, are deemed to be an affiliated person
under the 1940 Act; companies less than 5% owned are
portfolio companies where we directly or indirectly own less
than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company and where we have no other affiliations with such
portfolio company. As of March 31, 2007, we owned 25% of
the fully diluted common equity of Advantage Oilfield Group,
Ltd., we owned 100% of the fully diluted common equity of Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc., 60% of Genesis Coal Corp., 51% of the
fully diluted common equity of Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.
and certain of its affiliates, 80% of the fully diluted common
equity of NRG Manufacturing Inc. and 49% of the fully diluted
common equity of Whymore Coal Company (as well as 100% of two of
Whymores affiliates C&A Construction,
Inc. and E&L Construction, Inc.). We make available
significant managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. We
generally request and may receive rights to observe the meetings
of our portfolio companies Boards of Directors.
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
all Loans
|
|
Name of Portfolio Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Companies more than 25%
owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd.
|
|
Construction Services
|
|
Senior secured debt and common stock
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note,
15.00% due 5/30/09
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
|
(Alberta, Canada) Gas gathering
and processing (Texas)
|
|
Subordinated secured debt and
common equity
|
|
Second priority lien on
substantially all assets, subject to first priority lien of
senior lender, Citibank Texas, N.A.
|
|
Common shares; Subordinated secured
note, 18.00% due 12/22/2011
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Genesis Coal Corp.
|
|
Mining and Coal production
(Kentucky)
|
|
Senior Secured debt, warrants,
Preferred Shares and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets including equipment, although
Prospects lien on certain equipment is second to S600K
loan by First Tennessee Bank
|
|
Common shares; warrants, Preferred
Stock; senior secured note, 16.40% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Manufacturing (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common
equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note,
16.5% due 8/31/2013 Preferred shares, convertible, Series A;
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Whymore Coal Company
|
|
Mining and coal production
(Kentucky)
|
|
Senior secured debt and preferred
equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 16.31% due
12/31/2010
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Worcester Energy Partners, Inc.
|
|
Biomass power (Maine)
|
|
Senior secured debt convertible
preferred stock and common equity
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Preferred stock,
convertible, Series A; Senior secured note, 12.50% due 12/31/2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Companies 5% to 25%
owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
|
|
Construction services (West
Virginia)
|
|
Senior secured debt, preferred
equity with penny warrants
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Preferred shares; Warrants,
preferred shares, expiring 2/14/2016; Warrants, common shares,
expiring 2/14/2016;
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3.00% PIK due 2/14/2011
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Production services (Alberta,
Canada)
|
|
Senior secured debt and common stock
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Common shares; Senior secured note,
15.00% due 4/19/09
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
Nature of its
|
|
Title and Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held, at
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
all Loans
|
|
Name of Portfolio Company
|
|
Business (Location)
|
|
Held
|
|
Collateral Held
|
|
Investment Structure
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Companies less than 5%
owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Production services (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt with warrants
for common and preferred
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring
7/19/2012; Warrants, preferred shares, expiring 7/19/2012;
Senior secured note. 13.00% due 6/15/2009
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt and warrants
|
|
N/A loan repaid
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010,
through 9/30/2011
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Ohio)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured term note, 12.33%
due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings LLC
|
|
Coal mining (Virginia)
|
|
Secured subordinated debt
|
|
Second priority lien on
substantially all assets, subject to first priority lien of
senior lender, PlainsCapital Bank
|
|
Subordinated secured note, due
1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC
|
|
Natural gas marketing (Michigan)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Net profits royalty interest, 10%;
Senior secured note, 12.5% due 3/31/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Biofuels/Ethanol (Illinois)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.36% due
3/31/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Conquest Cherokee LLC
|
|
Oil and gas production (Tennessee)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Overriding royalty interest, 5-10%;
Senior secured note, 13.00% due 5/5/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
|
Oil and Gas Production (Texas)
|
|
Common shares
|
|
None
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLOGH, L.P.
|
|
Oil and Gas Production (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due
10/23/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Jettco Marine Services LLC
|
|
Shipping (Louisiana)
|
|
Subordinated secured debt
|
|
Second priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Subordinated secured note 12.00%
plus 4.00% PIK due 12/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Metal services (Texas)
|
|
Senior secured debt
|
|
First priority lien on
substantially all assets
|
|
Senior secured note, 14.00% due
03/31/2010
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
DETERMINATION
OF NET ASSET VALUE
The net asset value per share of our outstanding shares of
common stock will be determined quarterly by dividing the value
of total assets minus liabilities by the total number of shares
outstanding.
In calculating the value of our total assets, we will value
investments for which market quotations are readily available at
such market quotations. Short-term investments which mature in
60 days or less, such as U.S. Treasury bills, are
valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The
amortized cost
57
method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date of
purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to
maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at
maturity and cost. Short-term securities which mature in more
than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market price is not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a valuation policy
and a consistently applied valuation process which is under the
direction of our Board of Directors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our
investments may differ significantly from the values that would
have been used had a ready market existed for such investments,
and the differences could be material. For a discussion of the
risks inherent in determining the value of securities for which
readily available market values do not exist, see Risk
Factors Most of our portfolio investments are
recorded at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board
of Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty as to the
value of our portfolio investments.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the financial environment in which the portfolio
company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly
traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have a readily available market value, the fair value of
these investments may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for such
investments, and any such differences could be material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the Audit Committee
reviews the preliminary evaluations prepared by the independent
valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors, as well as
managements valuation recommendations. Management and the
independent valuation firm respond to the preliminary evaluation
to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee reviews the final valuation report and
managements valuation recommendations and makes a
recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation processes. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and
undertakes a similar analysis to determine the fair value of
each investment in the portfolio in good faith.
Determination of fair values involves subjective judgments and
estimates not susceptible to substantiation by auditing
procedures. Accordingly, under current auditing standards, the
notes to our financial statements will refer to the uncertainty
with respect to the possible effect of such valuations, and any
change in such valuations, on our financial statements.
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for
reinvestment of our distributions on behalf of our stockholders,
unless a stockholder elects to receive cash as provided below.
As a result, when our Board of Directors authorizes, and we
declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not
opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan will
have their cash dividends automatically reinvested in additional
shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash
dividends.
No action is required on the part of a registered stockholder to
have their cash dividend reinvested in shares of our common
stock. A registered stockholder may elect to receive an entire
dividend in cash by notifying the plan administrator and our
transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is
received by the plan administrator no later than the record date
for dividends to stockholders. The plan administrator sets up an
account for shares acquired through the plan for each
stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends in cash and
hold such shares in noncertificated form. Upon request by a
stockholder participating in
58
the plan, the plan administrator will, instead of crediting
shares to the participants account, issue a certificate
registered in the participants name for the number of
whole shares of our common stock and a check for any fractional
share. Such request by a stockholder must be received three days
prior to the dividend payable date in order for that dividend to
be paid in cash. If such request is received less than three
days prior to the dividend payable date, then the dividends are
reinvested and shares are repurchased for the stockholders
account; however, future dividends are paid out in cash on all
balances. Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker
or other financial intermediary may receive dividends in cash by
notifying their broker or other financial intermediary of their
election.
We may use primarily newly issued shares to implement the plan,
whether our shares are trading at a premium or at a discount to
net asset value. However, we reserve the right to purchase
shares in the open market in connection with our implementation
of the plan. The number of shares to be issued to a stockholder
is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the
dividend payable to such stockholder by the market price per
share of our common stock at the close of regular trading on The
NASDAQ National Market on the valuation date for such dividend.
If we use newly-issued shares to implement the plan, the
valuation date will not be earlier than the last day that
stockholders have the right to elect to receive cash in lieu of
shares. Market price per share on that date will be the closing
price for such shares on The NASDAQ National Market or, if no
sale is reported for such day, at the average of their reported
bid and asked prices. The number of shares of our common stock
to be outstanding after giving effect to payment of the dividend
cannot be established until the value per share at which
additional shares will be issued has been determined and
elections of our stockholders have been tabulated.
There are no brokerage charges or other charges to stockholders
who participate in the plan. The plan administrators fees
under the plan is paid by us. If a participant elects by written
notice to the plan administrator to have the plan administrator
sell part or all of the shares held by the plan administrator in
the participants account and remit the proceeds to the
participant, the plan administrator is authorized to deduct a
$15 transaction fee plus a $0.10 per share brokerage commissions
from the proceeds.
Stockholders who receive dividends in the form of stock are
subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as
are stockholders who elect to receive their dividends in cash. A
stockholders basis for determining gain or loss upon the
sale of stock received in a dividend from us will be equal to
the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to the
stockholder. Any stock received in a dividend will have a new
holding period for tax purposes commencing on the day following
the day on which the shares are credited to the
U.S. stockholders account.
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by
notifying the plan administrator via its website at
www.amstock.com or by filling out the transaction request form
located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to the
plan administrator at American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, P.O. Box 922, Wall Street Station,
New York, NY
10269-0560
or by calling the plan administrators Interactive Voice
Response System at
(888) 888-0313.
The plan may be terminated by us upon notice in writing mailed
to each participant at least 30 days prior to any payable
date for the payment of any dividend by us. All correspondence
concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator
by mail at American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10007 or by
telephone at
(718) 921-8200.
Stockholders who purchased their shares through or hold their
shares in the name of a broker or financial institution should
consult with a representative of their broker or financial
institution with respect to their participation in our dividend
reinvestment plan. Such holders of our stock may not be
identified as our registered stockholders with the plan
administrator and may not automatically have their cash dividend
reinvested in shares of our common stock.
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a general summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us and
to an investment in our shares. This summary does not purport to
be a complete
59
description of the income tax considerations applicable to us on
such an investment. For example, we have not described tax
consequences that we assume to be generally known by investors
or certain considerations that may be relevant to certain types
of holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal
income tax laws, including stockholders subject to the
alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt organizations, insurance
companies, dealers in securities, pension plans and trusts,
financial institutions, U.S. stockholders (as defined
below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar,
persons who mark-to-market our shares and persons who hold our
shares as part of a Straddle, Hedge or
conversion transaction. This summary assumes that
investors hold our common stock as capital assets (within the
meaning of the Code). The discussion is based upon the Code,
Treasury regulations, and administrative and judicial
interpretations, each as of the date of this prospectus and all
of which are subject to change, possibly retroactively, which
could affect the continuing validity of this discussion. We have
not sought and will not seek any ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service regarding this offering. This summary does not
discuss any aspects of U.S. estate or gift tax or foreign,
state or local tax. It does not discuss the special treatment
under U.S. federal income tax laws that could result if we
invested in tax-exempt securities or certain other investment
assets.
A U.S. stockholder is a beneficial owner of
shares of our common stock that is for U.S. federal income
tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or
the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the administration of such trust and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (2) it has a valid
election in place to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is not
a U.S. stockholder.
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership
will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. A prospective stockholder that is
a partner of a partnership holding shares of our common stock
should consult its tax advisors with respect to the purchase,
ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences to an
investor of an investment in our shares will depend on the facts
of his, her or its particular situation. We encourage investors
to consult their own tax advisors regarding the specific
consequences of such an investment, including tax reporting
requirements, the applicability of federal, state, local and
foreign tax laws, eligibility for the benefits of any applicable
tax treaty and the effect of any possible changes in the tax
laws.
Election
To Be Taxed As A RIC
As a business development company, we have qualified and elected
to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC,
we generally are not subject to corporate-level federal income
taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute
to our stockholders as dividends. To qualify as a RIC, we must,
among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset
diversification requirements (as described below). In addition,
to obtain RIC tax treatment, we must distribute to our
stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our
investment company taxable income, which is
generally our ordinary income plus the excess of realized net
short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital
losses (the Annual Distribution Requirement).
60
Taxation
As A RIC
Provided that we qualify as a RIC and satisfy the Annual
Distribution Requirement, we will not be subject to federal
income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable
income and net capital gain (i.e., net long-term capital gains
in excess of net short-term capital losses) we timely distribute
to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income
tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gain
not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.
We will be subject to a 4% non-deductible federal excise tax on
certain undistributed income of RICs unless we distribute in a
timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of
(1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year,
(2) 98% of our capital gain net income for the one-year
period ending October 31 in that calendar year and
(3) any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding
years. We currently intend to make sufficient distributions each
taxable year such that we will not be subject to federal income
or excise taxes on our net income.
In order to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we
must, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
qualify to be treated as a business development company under
the 1940 Act at all times during each taxable year;
|
|
|
|
derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income
from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain
securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other
securities, or other income derived with respect to our business
of investing in such stock or securities and net income derived
from an interest in a qualified publicly traded
partnership (as defined in the Code) (the 90% Income
Test); and
|
|
|
|
diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the
taxable year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash
equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any
one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our
assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
the issuer (which for these purposes includes the equity
securities of a qualified publicly traded
partnership); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in the
securities, other than U.S. Government securities or
securities of other RICs, (i) of one issuer (ii) of
two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under
applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or
similar or related trades or businesses or (iii) of one or
more qualified publicly traded partnerships (the
Diversification Tests).
|
To the extent that we invest in entities treated as partnerships
for federal income tax purposes (other than a qualified
publicly traded partnership), we generally must include
the items of gross income derived by the partnerships for
purposes of the 90% Income Test, and the income that is derived
from a partnership (other than a qualified publicly traded
partnership) will be treated as qualifying income for
purposes of the 90% Income Test only to the extent that such
income is attributable to items of income of the partnership
which would be qualifying income if realized by us directly. In
addition, we generally must take into account our proportionate
share of the assets held by partnerships (other than a
qualified publicly traded partnership) in which we
are a partner for purposes of the Diversification Tests.
In order to meet the 90% Income Test, we may establish one or
more special purpose corporations to hold assets from which we
do not anticipate earning dividend, interest or other qualifying
income under the 90% Income Test. Any such special purpose
corporation would generally be subject to U.S. federal
income tax, and could result in a reduced after-tax yield on the
portion of our assets held there.
We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances
in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt
obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as
having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with
payment-in-kind
interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or
issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a
portion of the original issue discount that
61
accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether
cash representing such income is received by us in the same
taxable year. Because any original issue discount accrued will
be included in our investment company taxable income for the
year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to
our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution
Requirement, even though we will not have received any
corresponding cash amount.
Gain or loss realized by us from warrants acquired by us as well
as any loss attributable to the lapse of such warrants generally
will be treated as capital gain or loss. Such gain or loss
generally will be long-term or short-term, depending on how long
we held a particular warrant.
Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized
to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy
distribution requirements. However, under the 1940 Act, we are
not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while
our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding
unless certain asset coverage tests are met. See
Regulation Senior securities. Moreover,
our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution
requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of
our portfolio
and/or
(2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC,
including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in
order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise
Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such dispositions at
times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.
If we fail to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement or
otherwise fail to qualify as a RIC in any taxable year, we will
be subject to tax in that year on all of our taxable income,
regardless of whether we make any distributions to our
stockholders. In that case, all of such income will be subject
to corporate-level federal income tax, reducing the amount
available to be distributed to our stockholders. See
Failure to Obtain RIC Tax Treatment below. In
contrast, assuming we qualify as a RIC, our corporate-level
federal income tax should be substantially reduced or
eliminated. See Election to be taxed as a RIC above.
Certain of our investment practices may be subject to special
and complex federal income tax provisions that may, among other
things, (i) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the
allowance of certain losses or deductions, (ii) convert
lower taxed long-term capital gain into higher taxed short-term
capital gain or ordinary income, (iii) convert an ordinary
loss or a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of
which is more limited), (iv) cause us to recognize income
or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash,
(v) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale
of stock or securities is deemed to occur (vi) adversely
alter the characterization of certain complex financial
transactions, and (vii) produce income that will not be
qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test. We will
monitor our transactions and may make certain tax elections in
order to mitigate the effect of these provisions.
To the extent that we invest in equity securities of entities
that are treated as partnerships for federal income tax
purposes, the effect of such investments for purposes of the 90%
Income Test and the Diversification Tests will depend on whether
the partnership is a qualified publicly traded
partnership or not. If the partnership is a
qualified publicly traded partnership, the net
income derived from such investments will be qualifying income
for purposes of the 90% Income Test and will be
securities for purposes of the Diversification
Tests, as described above. If the partnership, however, is not
treated as a qualified publicly traded partnership,
then the consequences of an investment in the partnership will
depend upon the amount and type of income and assets of the
partnership allocable to us. The income derived from such
investments may not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90%
Income Test and, therefore, could adversely affect our
qualification as a RIC. We intend to monitor our investments in
equity securities of entities that are treated as partnerships
for federal income tax purposes to prevent our disqualification
as a RIC.
We may invest in preferred securities or other securities the
federal income tax treatment of which may not be clear or may be
subject to recharacterization by the IRS. To the extent the tax
treatment of such securities or the income from such securities
differs from the expected tax treatment, it could affect the
timing or character of income recognized, requiring us to
purchase or sell securities, or otherwise change our portfolio,
in order to comply with the tax rules applicable to RICs under
the Code.
62
Taxation
Of U.S. Stockholders
Distributions by us generally are taxable to
U.S. stockholders as ordinary income or capital gains.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income (which is, generally, our ordinary income plus
realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net
long-term capital losses) will be taxable as ordinary income to
U.S. stockholders to the extent of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. For taxable years
beginning on or before December 31, 2008, to the extent
such distributions paid by us to noncorporate stockholders
(including individuals) are attributable to dividends from
U.S. corporations and certain qualified foreign
corporations, such distributions generally will be eligible for
taxation at rates applicable to long term capital gains
(currently a maximum tax rate of 15%) provided that we
properly designate such distribution as derived from
qualified dividend income. In this regard, it is not
anticipated that a significant portion of distributions paid by
us will be attributable to dividends and, therefore, generally
will not qualify for the 15% maximum rate. Distributions of our
net capital gains (which is generally our realized net long-term
capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital
losses) properly designated by us as capital gain
dividends will be taxable to a U.S. stockholder as
long-term capital gains at a maximum rate of 15% in the case of
individuals, trusts or estates, regardless of the
U.S. stockholders holding period for his, her or its
common stock and regardless of whether paid in cash or
reinvested in additional common stock. Distributions in excess
of our current and accumulated earnings and profits first will
reduce a U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in such
stockholders common stock and, after the adjusted basis is
reduced to zero, will constitute capital gains to such
U.S. stockholder.
Although we currently intend to distribute any long-term capital
gains at least annually, we may in the future decide to retain
some or all of our long-term capital gains, but designate the
retained amount as a deemed distribution. In that
case, among other consequences, we will pay tax on the retained
amount, each U.S. stockholder will be required to include
his, her or its share of the deemed distribution in income as if
it had been actually distributed to the U.S. stockholder,
and the U.S. stockholder will be entitled to claim a credit
equal to his, her or its allocable share of the tax paid thereon
by us. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax
will be added to the U.S. stockholders tax basis for
his, her or its common stock. Since we expect to pay tax on any
retained capital gains at our regular corporate tax rate, and
since that rate is in excess of the maximum rate currently
payable by individuals on long-term capital gains, the amount of
tax that individual stockholders will be treated as having paid
and for which they will receive a credit will exceed the tax
they owe on the retained net capital gain. Such excess generally
may be claimed as a credit against the
U.S. stockholders other federal income tax
obligations or may be refunded to the extent it exceeds a
stockholders liability for federal income tax. A
stockholder that is not subject to federal income tax or
otherwise required to file a federal income tax return would be
required to file a federal income tax return on the appropriate
form in order to claim a refund for the taxes we paid. In order
to utilize the deemed distribution approach, we must provide
written notice to our stockholders prior to the expiration of
60 days after the close of the relevant taxable year. We
cannot treat any of our investment company taxable income as a
deemed distribution.
For purposes of determining (1) whether the Annual
Distribution Requirement is satisfied for any year and
(2) the amount of capital gain dividends paid for that
year, we may, under certain circumstances, elect to treat a
dividend that is paid during the following taxable year as if it
had been paid during the taxable year in question. If we make
such an election, the U.S. stockholder will still be
treated as receiving the dividend in the taxable year in which
the distribution is made. However, any dividend declared by us
in October, November or December of any calendar year, payable
to stockholders of record on a specified date in any such month
and actually paid during January of the following year, will be
treated as if it had been received by our U.S. stockholders
on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
If an investor purchases shares of our common stock shortly
before the record date of a distribution, the price of the
shares will include the value of the distribution and the
investor will be subject to tax on the distribution even though
it represents a return of his, her or its investment.
63
A U.S. stockholder generally will recognize taxable gain or
loss if the stockholder sells or otherwise disposes of his, her
or its shares of our common stock. Any gain arising from such
sale or disposition generally will be treated as long-term
capital gain or loss if the stockholder has held his, her or its
shares for more than one year. Otherwise, it would be classified
as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any capital loss
arising from the sale or disposition of shares of our common
stock held for six months or less will be treated as long-term
capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain
dividends received, or undistributed capital gain deemed
received, with respect to such shares. In addition, all or a
portion of any loss recognized upon a disposition of shares of
our common stock may be disallowed if other substantially
identical shares are purchased (whether through reinvestment of
distributions or otherwise) within 30 days before or after
the disposition. The ability to otherwise deduct capital losses
may be subject to other limitations under the code.
In general, individual U.S. stockholders currently are
subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 15% on their net
capital gain, i.e., the excess of realized net long-term capital
gain over realized net short-term capital loss for a taxable
year, including a long-term capital gain derived from an
investment in our shares. Such rate is lower than the maximum
rate on ordinary income currently payable by individuals.
Corporate U.S. stockholders currently are subject to
federal income tax on net capital gain at the maximum 35% rate
also applied to ordinary income. Noncorporate stockholders with
net capital losses for a year (i.e., capital losses in excess of
capital gains) generally may deduct up to $3,000 of such losses
against their ordinary income each year; any net capital losses
of a noncorporate stockholder in excess of $3,000 generally may
be carried forward and used in subsequent years as provided in
the Code. Corporate stockholders generally may not deduct any
net capital losses for a year, but may carry back such losses
for three years or carry forward such losses for five years.
We will send to each of our U.S. stockholders, as promptly
as possible after the end of each calendar year, a notice
detailing, on a per share and per distribution basis, the
amounts includible in such U.S. stockholders taxable
income for such year as ordinary income and as long-term capital
gain. In addition, the federal tax status of each years
distributions generally will be reported to the Internal Revenue
Service (including the amount of dividends, if any, eligible for
the 15% maximum rate). Distributions may also be subject to
additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on a
U.S. stockholders particular situation. Dividends
distributed by us generally will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction or the preferential rate applicable
to qualifying dividends.
We may be required to withhold federal income tax (backup
withholding) currently at a rate of 28% from all taxable
distributions to any noncorporate U.S. stockholder
(1) who fails to furnish us with a correct taxpayer
identification number or a certificate that such stockholder is
exempt from backup withholding, or (2) with respect to whom
the IRS notifies us that such stockholder has failed to properly
report certain interest and dividend income to the IRS and to
respond to notices to that effect. An individuals taxpayer
identification number is his or her social security number. Any
amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit
against the U.S. stockholders federal income tax
liability and may entitle such shareholder to a refund,
provided that proper information is timely provided to
the IRS.
Taxation
Of Non-U.S.
Stockholders
Whether an investment in the shares is appropriate for a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will depend upon that persons particular circumstances. An
investment in the shares by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
may have adverse tax consequences.
Non-U.S. stockholders
should consult their tax advisers before investing in our common
stock.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income to
Non-U.S. stockholders
that are not effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
will generally be subject to withholding of federal income tax
at a rate of 30% (or lower rate provided by an applicable
treaty) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings
and profits. However, effective for taxable years beginning
before January 1, 2008, we generally will not be required
to withhold any amounts with respect to distributions of
(i) U.S.-source
interest income that would not have been subject to withholding
of federal income tax if they had been earned directly by a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and (ii) net short-term capital gains in
64
excess of net long-term capital losses that would not have been
subject to withholding of federal income tax if they had been
earned directly by a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
in each case only to the extent that such distributions are
properly designated by us as interest-related
dividends or short-term capital gain
dividends, as the case may be, and certain other
requirements are met.
Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a
Non-U.S. stockholder,
and gains realized by a
Non-U.S. stockholder
upon the sale of our common stock, that are not effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the
Non-U.S. stockholder,
will generally not be subject to federal withholding tax and
generally will not be subject to federal income tax unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
is a nonresident alien individual and is physically present in
the United States for more than 182 days during the taxable
year and meets certain other requirements. However, withholding
of federal income tax at a rate of 30% on capital gains of
nonresident alien individuals who are physically present in the
United States for more than the 182 day period only applies
in exceptional cases because any individual present in the
United States for more than 182 days during the taxable
year is generally treated as a resident for U.S. income tax
purposes; in that case, he or she would be subject to
U.S. income tax on his or her worldwide income at the
graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens, rather than
the 30% federal withholding tax. In addition, with respect of
dividends paid or deemed paid to
Non-U.S. stockholders
on or before December 31, 2007, that are attributable to
gain from U.S. real property interests
(USRPIs), which the Code defines to include direct
holdings of U.S. real property and interests (other than
solely as a creditor) in U.S. real property holding
corporations such as real estate investment
trusts (REITs) and also may include certain
REIT capital gain dividends, will generally be subject to
federal income tax and will give rise to an obligation for those
Non-U.S. stockholders
to file a federal income tax return, and may be subject to
withholding tax as well under future regulations.
If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed
rather than actual distributions (which we may do in the
future), a
Non-U.S. stockholder
will be entitled to a federal income tax credit or tax refund
equal to the stockholders allocable share of the tax we
pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In
order to obtain the refund, the
Non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file
a federal income tax return even if the
Non-U.S. stockholder
would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer
identification number or file a federal income tax return.
Accordingly, investment in the shares may not be appropriate for
a
Non-U.S. stockholder.
Distributions of our investment company taxable
income and net capital gains (including deemed
distributions) to
Non-U.S. stockholders,
and gains realized by
Non-U.S. stockholders
upon the sale of our common stock that is effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by
the
Non-U.S. stockholder
(or if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a
permanent establishment in the United States), will
be subject to federal income tax at the graduated rates
applicable to U.S. citizens, residents and domestic
corporations. Corporate
Non-U.S. stockholders
may also be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a
rate of 30% imposed by the Code (or lower rate provided by an
applicable treaty). In the case of a non-corporate
Non-U.S. stockholder,
we may be required to withhold federal income tax from
distributions that are otherwise exempt from withholding tax (or
taxable at a reduced rate) unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
certifies his or her foreign status under penalties of perjury
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The tax consequences to a
Non-U.S. stockholder
entitled to claim the benefits of an applicable tax treaty may
differ from those described herein.
Non-U.S. stockholders
are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to
the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in our
shares.
A
Non-U.S. stockholder
who is a nonresident alien individual may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding of federal income
tax on dividends unless the
Non-U.S. stockholder
provides us or the dividend paying agent with an IRS
Form W8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or otherwise
meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it
is a
Non-U.S. stockholder
or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Non-U.S. persons
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state,
local and foreign tax consequences of an investment in the
shares.
65
Failure
To Obtain RIC Tax Treatment
If we were unable to obtain tax treatment as a RIC, we would be
subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate
rates. We would not be able to deduct distributions to
stockholders, nor would they be required to be made.
Distributions would generally be taxable to our stockholders as
ordinary dividend income eligible for the 15% maximum rate to
the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits.
Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate
distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and
accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a
return of capital to the extent of the stockholders tax
basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a
capital gain.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
The following description is based on relevant portions of
the Maryland General Corporation Law and on our charter and
bylaws. This summary is not necessarily complete, and we refer
you to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and
bylaws for a more detailed description of the provisions
summarized below.
Capital
Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of stock, par value $.001 per share, all of which is initially
classified as common stock. Our common stock is traded on The
NASDAQ National Market under the symbol PSEC. There
are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase our stock. No
stock has been authorized for issuance under any equity
compensation plans. Under Maryland law, our stockholders
generally are not personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Under our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to
classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other
classes or series of stock, and to authorize the issuance of
such shares, without obtaining stockholder approval. As
permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter
provides that the Board of Directors, without any action by our
stockholders, may amend the charter from time to time to
increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or
the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we
have authority to issue.
Common
stock
All shares of our common stock have equal rights as to earnings,
assets, dividends and voting and, when they are issued, will be
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.
Distributions may be paid to the holders of our common stock if,
as and when authorized by our Board of Directors and declared by
us out of funds legally available therefor. Shares of our common
stock have no preemptive, conversion or redemption rights and
are freely transferable, except where their transfer is
restricted by federal and state securities laws or by contract.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us,
each share of our common stock would be entitled to share
ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for
distribution after we pay all debts and other liabilities and
subject to any preferential rights of holders of our preferred
stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each
share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of
directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or
series of stock, the holders of our common stock will possess
exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative voting in the
election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of common stock will elect all of our
directors, and holders of less than a majority of such shares
will be unable to elect any director.
Preferred
stock
Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to classify and
reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or
series of stock, including preferred stock. Prior to issuance of
shares of each class or series, the Board of Directors is
required by Maryland law and by our charter to set the terms,
preferences,
66
conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends or other distributions,
qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each
class or series. Thus, the Board of Directors could authorize
the issuance of shares of preferred stock with terms and
conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a transaction or a change in control that might
involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or
otherwise be in their best interest. You should note, however,
that any issuance of preferred stock must comply with the
requirements of the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act requires, among other
things, that (1) immediately after issuance and before any
dividend or other distribution is made with respect to our
common stock and before any purchase of common stock is made,
such preferred stock together with all other senior securities
must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total assets after
deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase
price, as the case may be, and (2) the holders of shares of
preferred stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class
to elect two directors at all times and to elect a majority of
the directors if dividends on such preferred stock are in
arrears by two years or more. Certain matters under the 1940 Act
require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and
outstanding preferred stock. For example, holders of preferred
stock would vote separately from the holders of common stock on
a proposal to cease operations as a business development
company. We believe that the availability for issuance of
preferred stock will provide us with increased flexibility in
structuring future financings and acquisitions.
Limitation
On Liability Of Directors And Officers; Indemnification And
Advance Of Expenses
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty
established by a final judgment as being material to the cause
of action. Our charter contains such a provision which
eliminates directors and officers liability to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the
requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
obligate ourselves to indemnify any present or former director
or officer or any individual who, while serving as a director or
officer and at our request, serves or has served another
corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a
director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any
claim or liability to which that person may become subject or
which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in
any such capacity and to pay or reimburse their reasonable
expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our
bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to
indemnify any present or former director or officer or any
individual who, while serving as a director or officer and at
our request, serves or has served another corporation, real
estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director,
officer, partner or trustee and who is made or threatened to be
made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service
in any such capacity from and against any claim or liability to
which that person may become subject or which that person may
incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and
to pay or reimburse their reasonable expenses in advance of
final disposition of a proceeding. The charter and bylaws also
permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any person who
served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities described
above and any of our employees or agents or any employees or
agents of our predecessor. In accordance with the 1940 Act, we
will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such
person would be subject by reason of such persons willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard
of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service
in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to
indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among
others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and
reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with
any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be
made, a party by
67
reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it
is established that (a) the act or omission of the director
or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the
proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or
(2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty,
(b) the director or officer actually received an improper
personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in
the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation
may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the
right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the
basis that a personal benefit was improperly received, unless in
either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for
expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to
advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the
corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by
the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he
or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written
undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the
amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately
determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our insurance policy does not currently provide coverage for
claims, liabilities and expenses that may arise out of
activities that a present or former director or officer of us
has performed for another entity at our request. There is no
assurance that such entities will in fact carry such insurance.
However, we note that we do not expect to request our present or
former directors or officers to serve another entity as a
director, officer, partner or trustee unless we can obtain
insurance providing coverage for such persons for any claims,
liabilities or expenses that may arise out of their activities
while serving in such capacities.
Provisions
Of The Maryland General Corporation Law And Our Charter And
Bylaws
Anti-takeover
Effect
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws
contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a
potential acquiror to acquire us by means of a tender offer,
proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to
discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire
control of us to negotiate first with our Board of Directors.
These provisions could have the effect of depriving shareholders
of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over
prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from
seeking to obtain control of us. We believe that the benefits of
these provisions outweigh the potential disadvantages of
discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other
things, the negotiation of such proposals may improve their
terms.
Control
share acquisitions
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that control
shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter (the Control Share Act). Shares owned by the
acquiror, by officers or by directors who are employees of the
corporation are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the
matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if
aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror
or in respect of which the acquiror is able to exercise or
direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of
a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise
voting power in electing directors within one of the following
ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
|
|
one-tenth or more but less than one-third,
|
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority, or
|
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power.
|
The requisite stockholder approval must be obtained each time an
acquiror crosses one of the thresholds of voting power set forth
above. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person
is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously
obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means
the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions.
68
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition may compel the Board of Directors of the corporation
to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held within
50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the
shares. The right to compel the calling of a special meeting is
subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including an
undertaking to pay the expenses of the meeting. If no request
for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the
question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the
acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement
as required by the statute, then the corporation may repurchase
for fair value any or all of the control shares, except those
for which voting rights have previously been approved. The right
of the corporation to repurchase control shares is subject to
certain conditions and limitations, including, as provided in
our bylaws, compliance with the 1940 Act. Fair value is
determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights for
the control shares, as of the date of the last control share
acquisition by the acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at
which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not
approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a
stockholders meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a
majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders
may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as
determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than
the highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control
share acquisition.
The Control Share Act does not apply (a) to shares acquired
in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation
is a party to the transaction or (b) to acquisitions
approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share
Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares of
stock. There can be no assurance that such provision will not be
amended or eliminated at any time in the future. However, we
will amend our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Act
only if the Board of Directors determines that it would be in
our best interests and if the SEC does not object to our
determination that our being subject to the Control Share Act
does not conflict with the 1940 Act.
Business
combinations
Under Maryland law, business combinations between a
Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an
affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five
years after the most recent date on which the interested
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business
combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or,
in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or
issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested
stockholder is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of the corporations shares; or
|
|
|
|
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time
within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was
the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of the
then outstanding voting stock of the corporation.
|
A person is not an interested stockholder under this statute if
the Board of Directors approved in advance the transaction by
which he otherwise would have become an interested stockholder.
However, in approving a transaction, the Board of Directors may
provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined
by the Board.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination
between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder
generally must be recommended by the Board of Directors of the
corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
|
|
|
|
|
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding
shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
|
|
|
|
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting
stock of the corporation other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the
business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate
or associate of the interested stockholder.
|
69
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the
corporations common stockholders receive a minimum price,
as defined under Maryland law, for their shares in the form of
cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid
by the interested stockholder for its shares.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions,
including business combinations that are exempted by the Board
of Directors before the time that the interested stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder. Our Board of Directors has
adopted a resolution that any business combination between us
and any other person is exempted from the provisions of the
Maryland Business Combination Act (the Business
Combination Act), provided that the business
combination is first approved by the Board of Directors,
including a majority of the directors who are not interested
persons as defined in the 1940 Act. This resolution, however,
may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If
this resolution is repealed, or the Board of Directors does not
otherwise approve a business combination, the statute may
discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and
increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Conflict
with 1940 Act
Our bylaws provide that, if and to the extent that any provision
of the Maryland General Corporation Law, including the Control
Share Act (if we amend our bylaws to be subject to such Act) and
the Business Combination Act, or any provision of our charter or
bylaws conflicts with any provision of the 1940 Act, the
applicable provision of the 1940 Act will control.
Classified
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. The current terms
of the first, second and third classes will expire in 2008, 2009
and 2007 respectively, and in each case, until their successors
are duly elected and qualify. Each year one class of Directors
will be elected by the stockholders. A classified board may
render a change in control of us or removal of our incumbent
management more difficult. We believe, however, that the longer
time required to elect a majority of a classified Board of
Directors will help to ensure the continuity and stability of
our management and policies.
Election
of directors
Our charter and bylaws provide that the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock
entitled to vote in the election of directors will be required
to elect a director. Under the charter, our Board of Directors
may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect
directors.
Number
of directors; vacancies; removal
Our charter provides that the number of directors will be set
only by the Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws.
Our bylaws provide that a majority of our entire Board of
Directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of
directors. However, unless our bylaws are amended, the number of
directors may never be less than three nor more than eight. Our
charter provides that, at such time as we have three independent
directors and our common stock is registered under the Exchange
Act, we elect to be subject to the provision of Subtitle 8 of
Title 3 of the Maryland General Corporation Law regarding
the filling of vacancies on the Board of Directors. Accordingly,
at such time, except as may be provided by the Board of
Directors in setting the terms of any class or series of
preferred stock, any and all vacancies on the Board of Directors
may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
remaining directors in office, even if the remaining directors
do not constitute a quorum, and any director elected to fill a
vacancy will serve for the remainder of the full term of the
directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor
is elected and qualifies, subject to any applicable requirements
of the 1940 Act.
Our charter provides that a director may be removed only for
cause, as defined in our charter, and then only by the
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to
be cast in the election of directors.
70
Action
by stockholders
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that stockholder
action can be taken only at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders or (unless the charter provides for stockholder
action by less than unanimous written consent, which our charter
does not) by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting.
These provisions, combined with the requirements of our bylaws
regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special meeting
of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying
consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual
meeting.
Advance
notice provisions for stockholder nominations and stockholder
proposals
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of persons for election to the Board
of Directors and the proposal of business to be considered by
stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of
the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) by a
stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has
complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With
respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the business
specified in our notice of the meeting may be brought before the
meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of
Directors at a special meeting may be made only
(1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by the
Board of Directors or (3) provided that the Board of
Directors has determined that directors will be elected at the
meeting, by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting
and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of the
bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice
of nominations and other business is to afford our Board of
Directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the
qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of
any other proposed business and, to the extent deemed necessary
or desirable by our Board of Directors, to inform stockholders
and make recommendations about such qualifications or business,
as well as to provide a more orderly procedure for conducting
meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws do not give our
Board of Directors any power to disapprove stockholder
nominations for the election of directors or proposals
recommending certain action, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or the
consideration of stockholder proposals if proper procedures are
not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third party from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of
directors or to approve its own proposal without regard to
whether consideration of such nominees or proposals might be
harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling
of special meetings of stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be
called by our Board of Directors and certain of our officers.
Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the
satisfaction of certain procedural and informational
requirements by the stockholders requesting the meeting, a
special meeting of stockholders will be called by the secretary
of the corporation upon the written request of stockholders
entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast at such meeting.
Approval
of extraordinary corporate action; amendment of charter and
bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially
all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in
similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business,
unless approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled
to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on
the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its
charter for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage,
but not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter. Our charter generally provides for approval
of charter amendments and extraordinary transactions by the
stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter. Our charter also provides
that certain charter amendments and any proposal for our
conversion, whether by merger or otherwise, from a closed-end
company to an open-end company or any proposal for our
liquidation or dissolution requires the approval of the
stockholders entitled to cast at least 80 percent of the
votes entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such
amendment or proposal is approved by at least two-thirds of our
continuing directors (in addition to approval by our Board of
Directors), such amendment or
71
proposal may be approved by a majority of the votes entitled to
be cast on such a matter. The continuing directors
are defined in our charter as our current directors as well as
those directors whose nomination for election by the
stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill
vacancies is approved by a majority of the continuing directors
then on the Board of Directors.
Our charter and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will
have the exclusive power to make, alter, amend or repeal any
provision of our bylaws.
No
appraisal rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection
with the Control Share Act discussed above, as permitted by the
Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter provides that
stockholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR PREFERRED STOCK
In addition to shares of common stock, our charter authorizes
the issuance of preferred stock. If we offer preferred stock
under this prospectus, we will issue an appropriate prospectus
supplement. We may issue preferred stock from time to time in
one or more series, without stockholder approval. Our Board of
Directors is authorized to fix for any series of preferred stock
the number of shares of such series and the designation,
relative powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such series; except that, such an
issuance must adhere to the requirements of the 1940 Act,
Maryland law and any other limitations imposed by law.
The 1940 Act requires, among other things, that
(1) immediately after issuance and before any distribution
is made with respect to common stock, the liquidation preference
of the preferred stock, together with all other senior
securities, must not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our total
assets (taking into account such distribution) and (2) the
holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be
entitled as a class to elect two directors at all times and to
elect a majority of the directors if dividends on the preferred
stock are in arrears by two years or more.
For any series of preferred stock that we may issue, our Board
of Directors will determine and the prospectus supplement
relating to such series will describe:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation and number of shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rate and time at which, and the preferences and conditions
under which, any dividends will be paid on shares of such
series, as well as whether such dividends are cumulative or
non-cumulative and participating or non-participating;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to convertibility or exchangeability of
the shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rights and preferences, if any, of holders of shares of such
series upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our
affairs;
|
|
|
|
the voting powers, if any, of the holders of shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to the redemption of the shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
any limitations on our ability to pay dividends or make
distributions on, or acquire or redeem, other securities while
shares of such series are outstanding;
|
|
|
|
any conditions or restrictions on our ability to issue
additional shares of such series or other securities;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. federal income
tax considerations; and
|
|
|
|
any other relative power, preferences and participating,
optional or special rights of shares of such series, and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.
|
72
All shares of preferred stock that we may issue will be
identical and of equal rank except as to the particular terms
thereof that may be fixed by our Board of Directors, and all
shares of each series of preferred stock will be identical and
of equal rank except as to the dates from which cumulative
dividends, if any, thereon will be cumulative.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR WARRANTS
The following is a general description of the terms of the
warrants we may issue from time to time. Particular terms of any
warrants we offer will be described in the prospectus supplement
relating to such warrants.
We may issue warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
Such warrants may be issued independently or together with
shares of common stock and may be attached or separate from such
shares of common stock. We will issue each series of warrants
under a separate warrant agreement to be entered into between us
and a warrant agent. The warrant agent will act solely as our
agent and will not assume any obligation or relationship of
agency for or with holders or beneficial owners of warrants.
A prospectus supplement will describe the particular terms of
any series of warrants we may issue, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the title of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the aggregate number of such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price or prices at which such warrants will be issued;
|
|
|
|
the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, in
which the price of such warrants may be payable;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
such warrants;
|
|
|
|
the price at which and the currency or currencies, including
composite currencies, in which the shares of common stock
purchasable upon exercise of such warrants may be purchased;
|
|
|
|
the date on which the right to exercise such warrants will
commence and the date on which such right will expire;
|
|
|
|
whether such warrants will be issued in registered form or
bearer form;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants
which may be exercised at any one time;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the number of such warrants issued with each
share of common stock;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the date on and after which such warrants and the
related shares of common stock will be separately transferable;
|
|
|
|
information with respect to book-entry procedures, if any;
|
|
|
|
if applicable, a discussion of certain U.S. federal income
tax considerations; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms of such warrants, including terms, procedures
and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of such
warrants.
|
We and the warrant agent may amend or supplement the warrant
agreement for a series of warrants without the consent of the
holders of the warrants issued thereunder to effect changes that
are not inconsistent with the provisions of the warrants and
that do not materially and adversely affect the interests of the
holders of the warrants.
Under the 1940 Act, we may generally only offer warrants
provided that (1) the warrants expire by their terms
within ten years; (2) the exercise or conversion price is
not less than the current market value at the date of issuance;
(3) our stockholders authorize the proposal to issue such
warrants, and our Board of Directors
73
approves such issuance on the basis that the issuance is in the
best interests of Prospect Capital and its stockholders; and
(4) if the warrants are accompanied by other securities,
the warrants are not separately transferable unless no class of
such warrants and the securities accompanying them has been
publicly distributed. The 1940 Act also provides that the amount
of our voting securities that would result from the exercise of
all outstanding warrants at the time of issuance may not exceed
25% of our outstanding voting securities.
DESCRIPTION
OF OUR DEBT SECURITIES
We may issue debt securities in one or more series under an
indenture to be entered into between us and a trustee. The
specific terms of each series of debt securities will be
described in the particular prospectus supplement relating to
that series. For a complete description of the terms of a
particular series of debt securities, you should read both this
prospectus and the prospectus supplement relating to that
particular series.
The prospectus supplement, which will accompany this prospectus,
will describe the particular series of debt securities being
offered by including:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation or title of the series of debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the total principal amount of the series of debt securities;
|
|
|
|
the percentage of the principal amount at which the series of
debt securities will be offered;
|
|
|
|
the date or dates on which principal will be payable;
|
|
|
|
the rate or rates (which may be either fixed or variable)
and/or the
method of determining such rate or rates of interest, if any;
|
|
|
|
the date or dates from which any interest will accrue, or the
method of determining such date or dates, and the date or dates
on which any interest will be payable;
|
|
|
|
the terms for redemption, extension or early repayment, if any;
|
|
|
|
the currencies in which the series of debt securities are issued
and payable;
|
|
|
|
the provision for any sinking fund;
|
|
|
|
any restrictive covenants;
|
|
|
|
any Events of Default;
|
|
|
|
whether the series of debt securities are issuable in
certificated form;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for defeasance or covenant defeasance;
|
|
|
|
any special federal income tax implications, including, if
applicable, federal income tax considerations relating to
original issue discount;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for convertibility or exchangeability of the debt
securities into or for any other securities;
|
|
|
|
whether the debt securities are subject to subordination and the
terms of such subordination;
|
|
|
|
the listing, if any, on a securities exchange;
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the trustee; and
|
|
|
|
any other terms.
|
The debt securities may be secured or unsecured obligations.
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a
business development company, to issue debt only in amounts such
that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at
least 200% after each issuance of debt. Unless the prospectus
supplement
74
states otherwise, principal (and premium, if any) and interest,
if any, will be paid by us in immediately available funds.
We are a closed-end, non-diversified investment company that has
filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the 1940 Act and has elected to be treated as a
RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. The 1940 Act contains
prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between
business development companies and their affiliates (including
any Investment Advisers or sub-advisers), principal underwriters
and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters and requires
that a majority of the directors be persons other than
interested persons, as that term is defined in the
1940 Act. In addition, the 1940 Act provides that we may not
change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or to
withdraw our election as, a business development company unless
approved by a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired
directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With
respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public
resale, be deemed an underwriter as that term is
defined in the Securities Act. Our intention is to not write
(sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated
with the publicly traded securities of our portfolio companies,
except that we may enter into hedging transactions to manage the
risks associated with interest rate and other market
fluctuations. However, we may purchase or otherwise receive
warrants to purchase the common stock of our portfolio companies
in connection with acquisition financing or other investment.
Similarly, in connection with an acquisition, we may acquire
rights to require the issuers of acquired securities or their
affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances. We
also do not intend to acquire securities issued by any
investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940
Act. Under these limits, we generally cannot acquire more than
3% of the voting stock of any registered investment company,
invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the
securities of one investment company or invest more than 10% of
the value of our total assets in the securities of more than one
investment company. With regard to that portion of our portfolio
invested in securities issued by investment companies, it should
be noted that such investments might subject our stockholders to
additional expenses. None of these policies are fundamental and
may be changed without stockholder approval.
Qualifying
Assets
Under the 1940 Act, a business development company may not
acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in
Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, which are referred to as
qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made,
qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the companys
total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets
relevant to our proposed business are the following:
(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any
public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer
(subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio
company, or from any person who is, or has been during the
preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible
portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such
rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible
portfolio company is defined in the 1940 Act as any issuer
which:
(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal
place of business in, the United States;
(b) is not an investment company (other than a small
business investment company wholly owned by the business
development company) or a company that would be an investment
company but for certain exclusions under the 1940 Act; and
(c) satisfies any of the following:
1. does not have any class of securities with respect to
which a broker or dealer may extend margin credit;
75
2. is controlled by a business development company or a
group of companies including a business development company and
the business development company has an affiliated person who is
a director of the eligible portfolio company; or
3. is a small and solvent company having total assets of
not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not
less than $2 million.
(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we
control.
(3) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a
U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an
affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident
thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to
reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the
purchase of its securities was unable to meet its obligations as
they came due without material assistance other than
conventional lending or financing agreements.
(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased
from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready
market for such securities and we already own 60% of the
outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.
(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on
or with respect to securities described in (1) through
(4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or
rights relating to such securities.
(6) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities
or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less
from the time of investment.
In addition, a business development company must have been
organized and have its principal place of business in the United
States and must be operated for the purpose of making
investments in the types of securities described in (1),
(2) or (3) above.
Managerial
Assistance to Portfolio Companies
In order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for
the purpose of the 70% test, the business development company
must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer
to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than
small and solvent companies described above) significant
managerial assistance; except that, where the business
development company purchases such securities in conjunction
with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other
persons in the group may make available such managerial
assistance. Making available significant managerial assistance
means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the business
development company, through its directors, officers or
employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide,
significant guidance and counsel concerning the management,
operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio
company.
Temporary
Investments
Pending investment in other types of qualifying
assets, as described above, our investments may consist of
cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high
quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the
time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as
temporary investments, so that 70% of our assets are qualifying
assets. Typically, we will invest in U.S. treasury bills or
in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements
are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the
U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement
involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified
security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to
repurchase it at an agreed upon future date and at a price which
is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an
agreed-upon
interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the
proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase
agreements. However, if more than 25% of our total assets
constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we
would not meet the Diversification Tests in order to qualify as
a RIC for federal income tax purposes. Thus, we do not intend to
enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in
excess of this limit. Our Investment Adviser will monitor the
creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into
repurchase agreement transactions.
76
Senior
Securities
We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple
classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our
common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act,
is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance.
In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we
must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our
stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares
unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time
of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up
to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or
emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage. For a
discussion of the risks associated with leverage, see Risk
Factors.
Code of
Ethics
We and Prospect Capital Management have each adopted a code of
ethics pursuant to
Rule 17j-1
under the 1940 Act that establishes procedures for personal
investments and restricts certain personal securities
transactions. Personnel subject to each code may invest in
securities for their personal investment accounts, including
securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such
investments are made in accordance with the codes
requirements. For information on how to obtain a copy of each
code of ethics, see Available Information.
Investment
Concentration
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios
total return, principally by investing in the debt
and/or
equity securities of private and microcap public companies. Many
of our investments are in the energy sector.
Compliance
Policies and Procedures
We and our Investment Adviser have adopted and implemented
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violation of the federal securities laws, and are required to
review these compliance policies and procedures annually for
their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation,
and to designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible
for administering the policies and procedures. William E.
Vastardis serves as Chief Compliance Officer for both Prospect
Capital and our Investment Adviser.
Proxy
Voting Policies and Procedures
We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to Prospect
Capital Management. The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of
Prospect Capital Management are set forth below. The guidelines
are reviewed periodically by Prospect Capital Management and our
independent directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change.
Introduction. As an investment adviser
registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Prospect
Capital Management has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the
best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, Prospect
Capital Management recognizes that it must vote client
securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and
in the best interests of its clients.
These policies and procedures for voting proxies for Prospect
Capital Managements Investment Advisory clients are
intended to comply with Section 206 of, and
Rule 206(4)-6
under, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
Proxy policies. These policies are designed to
be responsive to the wide range of subjects that may be the
subject of a proxy vote. These policies are not exhaustive due
to the variety of proxy voting issues that Prospect Capital
Management may be required to consider. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will vote proxies in accordance with these
guidelines unless: (1) Prospect Capital Management has
determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case
basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject
matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines,
(3) a material conflict of interest is present, or
(4) Prospect Capital Management might find it necessary to
vote contrary to its general guidelines to maximize shareholder
value
77
and vote in its clients best interests. In such cases, a
decision on how to vote will be made by the Proxy Voting
Committee (as described below). In reviewing proxy issues,
Prospect Capital Management will apply the following general
policies:
Elections of directors. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will vote in favor of the management-proposed
slate of directors. If there is a proxy fight for seats on the
Board or Prospect Capital Management determines that there are
other compelling reasons for withholding votes for directors,
the Proxy Voting Committee will determine the appropriate vote
on the matter. Prospect Capital Management believes that
directors have a duty to respond to shareholder actions that
have received significant shareholder support. Prospect Capital
Management may withhold votes for directors that fail to act on
key issues such as failure to implement proposals to declassify
boards, failure to implement a majority vote requirement,
failure to submit a rights plan to a shareholder vote and
failure to act on tender offers where a majority of shareholders
have tendered their shares. Finally, Prospect Capital Management
may withhold votes for directors of
non-U.S. issuers
where there is insufficient information about the nominees
disclosed in the proxy statement.
Appointment of auditors. Prospect Capital
Management believes that the company remains in the best
position to choose the auditors and will generally support
managements recommendation.
Changes in capital structure. Changes in a
companys charter, articles of incorporation or by-laws may
be required by state or federal regulation. In general, Prospect
Capital Management will cast its votes in accordance with the
companys management on such proposal. However, the Proxy
Voting Committee will review and analyze on a
case-by-case
basis any proposals regarding changes in corporate structure
that are not required by state or federal regulation.
Corporate restructurings, mergers and
acquisitions. Prospect Capital Management
believes proxy votes dealing with corporate reorganizations are
an extension of the investment decision. Accordingly, the Proxy
Voting Committee will analyze such proposals on a
case-by-case
basis.
Proposals affecting shareholder
rights. Prospect Capital Management will
generally vote in favor of proposals that give shareholders a
greater voice in the affairs of the company and oppose any
measure that seeks to limit those rights. However, when
analyzing such proposals, Prospect Capital Management will weigh
the financial impact of the proposal against the impairment of
shareholder rights.
Corporate governance. Prospect Capital
Management recognizes the importance of good corporate
governance in ensuring that management and the Board of
Directors fulfill their obligations to the shareholders.
Prospect Capital Management favors proposals promoting
transparency and accountability within a company.
Anti-takeover measures. The Proxy Voting
Committee will evaluate, on a
case-by-case
basis, proposals regarding anti-takeover measures to determine
the measures likely effect on shareholder value dilution.
Stock splits. Prospect Capital Management will
generally vote with management on stock split matters.
Limited liability of directors. Prospect
Capital Management will generally vote with management on
matters that would affect the limited liability of directors.
Social and corporate responsibility. The Proxy
Voting Committee may review and analyze on a
case-by-case
basis proposals relating to social, political and environmental
issues to determine whether they will have a financial impact on
shareholder value. Prospect Capital Management may abstain from
voting on social proposals that do not have a readily
determinable financial impact on shareholder value.
Proxy voting procedures. Prospect Capital
Management will generally vote proxies in accordance with these
guidelines. In circumstances in which (1) Prospect Capital
Management has determined to consider the matter on a
case-by-case
basis (as is stated in these guidelines), (2) the subject
matter of the vote is not covered by these guidelines,
(3) a material conflict of interest is present, or
(4) Prospect Capital Management
78
might find it necessary to vote contrary to its general
guidelines to maximize shareholder value and vote in its
clients best interests, the Proxy Voting Committee will
vote the proxy.
Proxy voting committee. Prospect Capital
Management has formed a proxy voting committee to establish
general proxy policies and consider specific proxy voting
matters as necessary. In addition, members of the committee may
contact management and interested shareholder groups as
necessary to discuss proxy issues. Members of the committee will
include relevant senior personnel. The committee may also
evaluate proxies where we face a potential conflict of interest
(as discussed below). Finally, the committee monitors adherence
to guidelines, and reviews the policies contained in this
statement from time to time.
Conflicts of interest. Prospect Capital
Management recognizes that there may be a potential conflict of
interest when it votes a proxy solicited by an issuer that is
its advisory client or a client or customer of one of our
affiliates or with whom it has another business or personal
relationship that may affect how it votes on the issuers
proxy. Prospect Capital Management believes that adherence to
these policies and procedures ensures that proxies are voted
with only its clients best interests in mind. To ensure
that its votes are not the product of a conflict of interests,
Prospect Capital Management requires that: (i) anyone
involved in the decision making process (including members of
the Proxy Voting Committee) disclose to the chairman of the
Proxy Voting Committee any potential conflict that he or she is
aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any
interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (ii) employees
involved in the decision making process or vote administration
are prohibited from revealing how Prospect Capital Management
intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted
influence from interested parties.
Proxy voting. Each accounts custodian
will forward all relevant proxy materials to Prospect Capital
Management, either electronically or in physical form to the
address of record that Prospect Capital Management has provided
to the custodian.
Proxy recordkeeping. Prospect Capital
Management must retain the following documents pertaining to
proxy voting:
|
|
|
|
|
copies of its proxy voting polices and procedures;
|
|
|
|
copies of all proxy statements;
|
|
|
|
records of all votes cast by Prospect Capital Management;
|
|
|
|
copies of all documents created by Prospect Capital Management
that were material to making a decision how to vote proxies or
that memorializes the basis for that decision; and
|
|
|
|
copies of all written client requests for information with
regard to how Prospect Capital Management voted proxies on
behalf of the client as well as any written responses provided.
|
All of the above-referenced records will be maintained and
preserved for a period of not less than five years from the end
of the fiscal year during which the last entry was made. The
first two years of records must be maintained at our office.
Proxy voting records. Clients may obtain
information about how Prospect Capital Management voted proxies
on their behalf by making a written request for proxy voting
information to: Compliance Officer, Prospect Capital Management,
LLC, 10 East 40th Street, 44th Floor, New York, NY
10016.
CUSTODIAN,
TRANSFER AND DIVIDEND PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Our Securities are held under a custody agreement by
U.S. Bank National Association. The address of the
custodian is: 1555 North Rivercenter Drive, MK-WI-5302,
Milwaukee, WI 53212, Attention: Mutual Fund Custody Account
Administrator, facsimile:
(866) 350-1430.
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company will act
as our transfer agent, dividend paying agent and registrar. The
principal business address of American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company is 59 Maiden Lane, New
York, NY 10007, telephone number:
(718) 921-8200.
79
BROKERAGE
ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES
Since we generally acquire and dispose of our investments in
privately negotiated transactions, we infrequently use brokers
in the normal course of our business. From the commencement of
all operations through March 31, 2007, we have not paid any
brokerage commissions. Subject to policies established by our
Board of Directors, the Investment Adviser is primarily
responsible for the execution of the publicly traded securities
portion of our portfolio transactions and the allocation of
brokerage commissions. The Investment Adviser does not expect to
execute transactions through any particular broker or dealer,
but seeks to obtain the best net results for Prospect Capital,
taking into account such factors as price (including the
applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of
order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of
the firm and the firms risk and skill in positioning
blocks of securities. While the Investment Adviser generally
seeks reasonably competitive trade execution costs, Prospect
Capital will not necessarily pay the lowest spread or commission
available. Subject to applicable legal requirements, the
Investment Adviser may select a broker based partly upon
brokerage or research services provided to the Investment
Adviser and Prospect Capital and any other clients. In return
for such services, we may pay a higher commission than other
brokers would charge if the Investment Adviser determines in
good faith that such commission is reasonable in relation to the
services provided.
We may sell the Securities in any of three ways (or in any
combination): (a) through underwriters or dealers;
(b) directly to a limited number of purchasers or to a
single purchaser; or (c) through agents. Any underwriter or
agent involved in the offer and sale of the Securities will also
be named in the applicable prospectus supplement. The Securities
may be sold at-the-market to or through a market
maker or into an existing trading market for the securities, on
an exchange or otherwise. The prospectus supplement will set
forth the terms of the offering of such securities, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the name or names of any underwriters, dealers or agents and the
amounts of Securities underwritten or purchased by each of them;
|
|
|
|
the offering price of the Securities and the proceeds to us and
any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed
or paid to dealers; and
|
|
|
|
any securities exchanges on which the Securities may be listed.
|
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will
authorize underwriters or other persons acting as our agents to
solicit offers by certain institutions to purchase the
Securities from us pursuant to contracts providing for payment
and delivery on a future date. Institutions with which such
contracts may be made include commercial and savings banks,
insurance companies, pension funds, investment companies,
educational and charitable institutions and others, but in all
cases such institutions must be approved by us. The obligations
of any purchaser under any such contract will be subject to the
condition that the purchase of the securities not at the time of
delivery be prohibited under the laws of the jurisdiction to
which such purchaser is subject. The underwriters and such other
agents will not have any responsibility in respect of the
validity or performance of such contracts. Such contracts will
be subject only to those conditions set forth in the prospectus
supplement, and the prospectus supplement will set forth the
commission payable for solicitation of such contracts.
We may use Stock to acquire investments in companies, the terms
of which will be further disclosed in a prospectus supplement.
Any offering price and any discounts or concessions allowed or
reallowed or paid to dealers may be changed from time to time.
We may sell shares of our common stock at a price below net
asset value per share if the following conditions are met:
(1) a majority of the our directors who have no financial
interest in the sale and a majority of such directors who are
not interested persons of us have determined that any such sale
would be in our best interests and in the best interests of our
stockholders; and (2) a majority of our directors who have
no financial
80
interest in the sale and a majority of such directors who are
not interested persons of us, in consultation with the
underwriter or underwriters of the offering if it is to be
underwritten, have determined in good faith, and as of a time
immediately prior to the first solicitation by or on behalf of
us of firm commitments to purchase such securities or
immediately prior to the issuance of such securities, that the
price at which such securities are to be sold is not less than a
price which closely approximates the market value of those
securities, less any distributing commission or discount. On
January 17, 2007, our stockholders approved, for a one year
period, the sale of shares of our common stock at a price below
net asset value per share if the above conditions are met.
If underwriters are used in the sale of any Securities, the
Securities will be acquired by the underwriters for their own
account and may be resold from time to time in one or more
transactions, including negotiated transactions, at a fixed
public offering price or at varying prices determined at the
time of sale. The Securities may be either offered to the public
through underwriting syndicates represented by managing
underwriters, or directly by underwriters. Generally, the
underwriters obligations to purchase the Securities will
be subject to certain conditions precedent.
The maximum commission or discount to be received by any NASD
member or independent broker-dealer will not exceed 5%.
We may sell the Securities through agents from time to time. The
prospectus supplement will name any agent involved in the offer
or sale of the Securities and any commissions we pay to them.
Generally, any agent will be acting on a best efforts basis for
the period of its appointment.
We may authorize underwriters, dealers or agents to solicit
offers by certain purchasers to purchase the Securities from us
at the public offering price set forth in the prospectus
supplement pursuant to delayed delivery contracts providing for
payment and delivery on a specified date in the future. The
contracts will be subject only to those conditions set forth in
the prospectus supplement, and the prospectus supplement will
set forth any commissions we pay for soliciting these contracts.
Agents, dealers and underwriters may be entitled to
indemnification by us against certain civil liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act or to
contribution with respect to payments which the agents or
underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof. Agents,
dealers and underwriters may be customers of, engage in
transactions with, or perform services for us in the ordinary
course of business.
We may enter into derivative transactions with third parties, or
sell securities not covered by this prospectus to third parties
in privately negotiated transactions. If the applicable
prospectus supplement indicates, in connection with those
derivatives, the third parties may sell securities covered by
this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement,
including in short sale transactions. If so, the third party may
use securities pledged by us or borrowed from us or others to
settle those sales or to close out any related open borrowings
of stock, and may use securities received from us in settlement
of those derivatives to close out any related open borrowings of
stock. The third party in such sale transactions will be an
underwriter and, if not identified in this prospectus, will be
identified in the applicable prospectus supplement (or a
post-effective amendment). We or one of our affiliates may loan
or pledge securities to a financial institution or other third
party that in turn may sell the securities using this
prospectus. Such financial institution or third party may
transfer its short position to investors in our Securities or in
connection with a simultaneous offering of other securities
offered by this prospectus or otherwise.
Any of our common stock sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement
will be listed on The NASDAQ National Market, or another
exchange on which our common stock is traded.
In order to comply with the securities laws of certain states,
if applicable, the Securities offered hereby will be sold in
such jurisdictions only through registered or licensed brokers
or dealers. In addition, in certain states, the Securities may
not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for
sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the
registration or qualification requirements is available and is
complied with.
81
Certain legal matters regarding the securities offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for Prospect Capital by Clifford
Chance US LLP, New York, NY, and Venable LLP as special Maryland
counsel.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BDO Seidman, LLP is the independent registered public accounting
firm of Prospect Capital.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form N-2,
together with all amendments and related exhibits, under the
Securities Act, with respect to our Securities offered by this
prospectus. The registration statement contains additional
information about us and the Securities being registered by this
prospectus. We file with or submit to the SEC annual, quarterly
and current periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information meeting the informational requirements of the
Exchange Act. This information and the information specifically
regarding how we voted proxies relating to portfolio securities
for the period ended June 30, 2006, are available free of
charge by contacting us at 10 East 40th Street,
44th floor, New York, NY 10016 or by telephone at
toll-free
(888) 748-0702.
You may inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and
other information, as well as the registration statement and
related exhibits and schedules, at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C.
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
(202) 551-8090.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information filed
electronically by us with the SEC which are available on the
SECs Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
Copies of these reports, proxy and information statements and
other information may be obtained, after paying a duplicating
fee, by electronic request at the following
E-mail
address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SECs Public
Reference Section, Washington, D.C.
20549-0102.
82
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
|
|
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Commencement of operations |
F-1
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments at fair value (cost of
$205,728 and $123,593, respectively, Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (cost of
$101,094 and $39,759, respectively)
|
|
$
|
110,268
|
|
|
$
|
49,585
|
|
Affiliate investments (cost of
$14,751 and $25,329, respectively)
|
|
|
14,751
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments (cost of $89,883 and $58,505, respectively)
|
|
|
86,234
|
|
|
|
59,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
|
211,253
|
|
|
|
133,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
|
99,584
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
Receivables for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,968
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Loan principal
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Securities sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Other
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from Prospect Administration
(Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Due from Prospect Energy
Management (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
314,561
|
|
|
|
138,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Credit facility payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
Payable for investments
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft
|
|
|
5,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Prospect Administration
(Note 5)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Prospect Capital Management
(Note 5)
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
12,794
|
|
|
|
30,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Net
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per
share (100,000,000 and 100,000,000 common shares authorized,
respectively; 19,879,231 and 7,069,873 issued and outstanding,
respectively)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
298,659
|
|
|
|
97,266
|
|
Undistributed (distributions in
excess of) net investment income
|
|
|
(4,688
|
)
|
|
|
319
|
|
Accumulated realized gains on
investments
|
|
|
2,251
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on
investments
|
|
|
5,525
|
|
|
|
10,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per
Share
|
|
$
|
15.18
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-2
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except shares and per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (Net of
foreign withholding tax of $67 and
$ , respectively)
|
|
$
|
3,845
|
|
|
$
|
1,319
|
|
Affiliate investments (Net of
foreign withholding tax of $35 and
$ ,respectively)
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
8,670
|
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend income
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other income
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment
Income
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment advisory fees
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and credit
facility costs
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer and
Sub-administration fees
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Other general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on
investments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
(2,038
|
)
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
4,976
|
|
|
$
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets
resulting from operations per share:
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
Weighted average shares of common
stock outstanding:
|
|
|
19,697,473
|
|
|
|
7,055,176
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Net Profits Interests, Prepayment Penalties not related
to loans, Deal Deposit and Overriding Royalty Interests. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-3
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except shares and per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments (Net of
foreign withholding tax of $112 and
$ , respectively)
|
|
$
|
9,455
|
|
|
$
|
3,334
|
|
Affiliate investments (Net of
foreign withholding tax of $202 and
$ , respectively)
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
8,656
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
20,948
|
|
|
|
8,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend income
|
|
|
4,389
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control investments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate investments
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-control/Non-affiliate
investments
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other income
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment
Income
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment advisory fees
|
|
|
7,410
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and credit
facility costs
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer and
Sub-administration fees
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Other general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
14,782
|
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on
investments
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
(4,851
|
)
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations
|
|
$
|
11,880
|
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets
resulting from operations per share:
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
Weighted average shares of common
stock outstanding:
|
|
|
14,341,811
|
|
|
|
7,055,125
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Net Profits Interests, Prepayment Penalties not related
to loans, Deal Deposit and Overriding Royalty Interests. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-4
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except share data) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Increase in Net Assets from
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
14,782
|
|
|
$
|
5,582
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on
investments
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
(4,851
|
)
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations
|
|
|
11,880
|
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to
Shareholders:
|
|
|
(19,790
|
)
|
|
|
(5,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share
Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from shares sold
|
|
|
197,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less offering costs of public
share offerings
|
|
|
(869
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
Reinvestment of dividends
|
|
|
4,719
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Net Assets
Resulting from Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
201,407
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase in Net
Assets:
|
|
|
193,497
|
|
|
|
1,635
|
|
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets at End of
Period
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share
Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares sold
|
|
|
12,526,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued through reinvestment
of dividends
|
|
|
282,708
|
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in capital share
activity
|
|
|
12,809,358
|
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of
period
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding at End of
Period
|
|
|
19,879,231
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-5
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except share data) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets
resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
11,880
|
|
|
$
|
6,956
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
4,851
|
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
Net realized gain (loss) on
investments
|
|
|
(1,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of original issue
discount on investments
|
|
|
(1,436
|
)
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing
costs
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(106,846
|
)
|
|
|
(1,414,857
|
)
|
Sales of investments
|
|
|
28,096
|
|
|
|
1,413,456
|
|
Net investments in money market
funds
|
|
|
(97,976
|
)
|
|
|
(7,095
|
)
|
Increase in interest receivable
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
Increase in dividends receivable
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in loan principal
receivable
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in receivable for
securities sold
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other receivable
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in due from Gas Solutions
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Decrease (increase) in due from
Prospect Administration
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in due from
Prospect Capital Management
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Decrease in deferred offering costs
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in payable for securities
purchased
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due to Prospect
Administration
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due to Prospect
Capital Management
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued
expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Increase in other current
liabilities
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,213
|
)
|
|
|
(2,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
(28,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
197,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred financing
costs
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
Offering costs from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
(869
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(15,071
|
)
|
|
|
(5,392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In)
Financing Activities
|
|
|
152,249
|
|
|
|
(5,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in
Cash
|
|
|
(5,964
|
)
|
|
|
(8,527
|
)
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Bank Overdraft), End of
Period
|
|
$
|
(5,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid For
Interest
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing
Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in connection with
dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
$
|
4,719
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-6
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or
greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group Ltd.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, Class A
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due
5/30/2009(3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,321
|
|
|
|
16,867
|
|
|
|
16,867
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,086
|
|
|
|
17,086
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(4)
|
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note, 18.00%
due 12/22/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,282
|
|
|
|
37,900
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Corp.
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, preferred shares,
expiring 2/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.40%(10)
due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,786
|
|
|
|
12,646
|
|
|
|
9,805
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,689
|
|
|
|
9,807
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
Texas/
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
4,596
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.50%(5) due
8/31/2013
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,080
|
|
|
|
10,080
|
|
|
|
10,080
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,396
|
|
|
|
14,676
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company, Inc.(6)
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.03%(7) due
12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,644
|
|
|
$
|
10,644
|
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,742
|
|
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-7
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2007 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.(8)
|
|
Maine/Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.50% due
12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,089
|
|
|
|
24,897
|
|
|
|
24,897
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,899
|
|
|
|
24,898
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,094
|
|
|
|
110,268
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to
24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(9)
|
|
West Virginia/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, expiring 2/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3.00%
PIK due 1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,380
|
|
|
|
5,175
|
|
|
|
5,175
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,586
|
|
|
|
5,586
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Production
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due
4/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
8,897
|
|
|
|
8,897
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,165
|
|
|
|
9,165
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,751
|
|
|
|
14,751
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.(11)
|
|
Texas/
Production
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring
7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
596,251
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Warrants, Series A redeemable
preferred shares, expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due
6/15/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,507
|
|
|
|
10,768
|
|
|
|
10,768
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,782
|
|
|
|
11,782
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-8
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2007 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
C&J Cladding LLC
|
|
Texas/Metal
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring
3/30/2014
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%(12)
due 3/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Illinois/
Biofuels/
Ethanol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.35%(13)
due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC(14)
|
|
Michigan/
Natural Gas
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 12.50% due
3/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,840
|
|
|
|
4,782
|
|
|
|
4,782
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC(14)
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%(16)
due 5/5/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
10,028
|
|
|
|
10,028
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution Petroleum Corp.(17)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
139,926
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jettco Marine Services LLC(14)
|
|
Louisiana/
Shipping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note,
12.00%(18), plus 4.0% PIK due 12/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,604
|
|
|
|
6,482
|
|
|
|
6,482
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010 to
3/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,115,776
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy, LLC(19)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated revolving credit
facility, 12.22% (20) due 11/30/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
23,694
|
|
|
|
23,694
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLOGH, L.P.(19)
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.00%, Due
10/23/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
15,297
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-9
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2007 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
|
|
Virginia/ Mining
and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 15.00%,
15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/Non-
Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,883
|
|
|
|
86,234
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,728
|
|
|
|
211,253
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Institutional Money
Market Funds Government Portfolio (Class I)
|
|
|
|
|
91,847,284
|
|
|
|
91,847
|
|
|
|
91,847
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
First American Funds,
Inc. Prime Obligations Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
7,736,865
|
|
|
|
7,737
|
|
|
|
7,737
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Money Market
Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,584
|
|
|
|
99,584
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
305,312
|
|
|
$
|
310,837
|
|
|
|
103.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the board
of directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Prospect Energy has the right to purchase 184 shares of
Class A common shares at a purchase price of $1.00 per
share in the event of a default under the credit agreement. |
|
(4) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. and NRG Manufacturing, Inc. are
wholly-owned investments of Prospect Energy. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 16.5% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Whymore investment.
The senior secured debt is with C&A Construction, Inc.
(C&A), which owns the equipment. E&L
Construction, Inc. (E&L) leases the equipment
from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator
with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives
revenues and pays all operating expenses. Whymore Coal Company,
Inc. (Whymore) applies for and holds permits on
behalf of E&L. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under
the C&A credit agreement with Prospect Energy. Prospect
Energy owns 10,000 shares of common stock of C&A (100%
ownership), 10,000 shares of common stock of E&L (100%
ownership), and 4,900 shares of common stock of Whymore
(49% ownership). Prospect Energy owns 4,285 Series A
convertible preferred shares in each of C&A, E&L and
Whymore. Additionally, Prospect Energy retains an option to
purchase the remaining 51% of Whymore. As of December 31,
2006, the Board of Directors of Prospect Energy assessed a fair
value of $0 for all of these equity positions. |
|
(7) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
5-Year US
Treasury Note plus 11.5%; rate reflected is as of
December 31, 2006. |
|
(8) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Worcester investment.
Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of common stock in
Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. (WEHI) representing
100%. WEHI, in turn, owns 51 |
F-10
PROSPECT
CAPITAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2007 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
membership certificates in Biochips LLC, which represents 51%
ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 282 shares of common
stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc. (WECO), which
represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns
1,665 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Partners,
Inc. (WEPI), which represents 51% ownership.
Prospect Energy also owns 1,000 of series A convertible
preferred shares in WEPI. WECO, WEPI and Biochips LLC are joint
borrowers on the term note issued by Prospect Energy. WEPI owns
the equipment and operates the biomass generation facility.
Biochips LLC currently has no material operations. |
|
(9) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy
Holdings (Appalachian Energy) investment. Prospect
Energy owns 100 shares of Class A common stock of AEH
Investment Corp. (AEH), 200 shares of
Series A preferred stock of AEH and 6,065 warrants,
expiring 2/14/2016 to purchase Class A common stock. The
senior secured note is with C & S Operating LLC and
East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC. AEH owns Appalachian Energy. |
|
(10) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
6-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
|
(11) |
|
The Portfolio Investment does business as Cougar Pressure
Control. |
|
(12) |
|
Interest rate is LIBOR plus 10.0%; rate reflected is as of
December 31, 2006. |
|
(13) |
|
Prospect Energy has a net profits interest in the Portfolio
Investment. |
|
(14) |
|
Prospect Energy has an overriding royalty interest and net
profits interest in the Portfolio Investment. |
|
(15) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
|
(16) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
|
(17) |
|
Formerly known as Natural Gas Systems, Inc. |
|
(18) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or
3-Month
LIBOR plus 6.11%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
|
(19) |
|
Prospect Energy has an overriding royalty interest in Portfolio
Investment. |
|
(20) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 12.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.0%; rate reflected is as of December 31, 2006. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-11
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
Control Investments (25.00% or
greater of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Gas
Gathering and
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,875
|
|
|
$
|
14,700
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Subordinated secured note, 18.00%
due 12/22/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,275
|
|
|
|
33,100
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.(4)
|
|
Maine/Biomass
Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 12.50% due
12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,338
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,485
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Control
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,759
|
|
|
|
49,585
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate Investments (5.00% to
24.99% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group Ltd.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, Class A
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due
5/30/2009(5)
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
15,926
|
|
|
|
15,926
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC(6)
|
|
West Virginia/
Construction
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Warrants, expiring 2/14/2016
|
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 14.00%, 3.00%
PIK due 1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing,
Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.00% due
4/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliate
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-12
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate
Investments (less than 5.00% of voting control)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corp.
|
|
Texas/
Production
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, common shares, expiring
7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
596,251
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Warrants, Series A redeemable
preferred shares, expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.00% due
6/15/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,099
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Illinois/
Biofuels/
Ethanol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 15.50%(7) due
3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC
|
|
Michigan/
Natural Gas
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 12.50% due
3/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, 13.24%(8) due
5/5/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Corp.
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, preferred shares,
expiring 2/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 15.89%(9) due
12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil
and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, expiring 5/4/2010
through 6/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
842,527
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Oil and
Gas Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, registered
|
|
|
|
|
732,528
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Common shares, unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
139,926
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-13
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par Value/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In 000s except share amounts)
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC(10)
|
|
Ohio/Oil and Gas
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 13.32% due
4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,330
|
|
|
|
13,139
|
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,609
|
|
|
|
14,608
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
|
|
Virginia/ Mining
and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured note, 15.00%,
15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company, Inc.(11)
|
|
Kentucky/
Mining and Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, convertible,
Series A
|
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Senior secured note, 16.59%(12)
due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,425
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Control/
Non-Affiliate Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,505
|
|
|
|
59,055
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,593
|
|
|
|
133,969
|
|
|
|
123.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Funds,
Inc. Prime Obligations Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
1,607,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,201
|
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
125.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the board
of directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned investment of
Prospect Energy. |
|
(4) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Worcester investment.
Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of common stock in
Worcester Energy Holdings, Inc. (WEHI) representing
100%. WEHI, in turn, owns 51 membership certificates in Biochips
LLC, which represents 51% ownership. Prospect Energy also owns
282 shares of common stock in Worcester Energy Co., Inc.
(WECO), which represents 51% ownership. Prospect
Energy also owns 1,665 shares of common stock in Worcester
Energy Partners, Inc. (WEPI), which represents 51%
ownership. Prospect Energy also owns 1,000 of series A
convertible preferred shares in WEPI. WECO, WEPI and Biochips
LLC are joint borrowers on the term note issued by Prospect
Energy. WEPI owns the equipment and operates the biomass
generation facility. Biochips LLC currently has no material
operations. |
F-14
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE OF
INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2006 (Continued)
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Prospect Energy has the right to purchase 184 shares of
Class A common shares at a purchase price of $1.00 per
share in the event of a default under the credit agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Appalachian Energy
Holdings (Appalachian Energy) investment. Prospect
Energy owns 100 shares of Class A common stock of AEH
Investment Corp. (AEH), 200 shares of
Series A preferred stock of AEH and 6,065 warrants,
expiring 2/14/2016 to purchase Class A common stock. The
senior secured note is with C & S Operating LLC and
East Cumberland L.L.C., both operating companies owned by
Appalachian Energy Holdings LLC. AEH owns Appalachian Energy. |
|
(7) |
|
Interest rate is LIBOR plus 10.0%; rate reflected is as of
June 30, 2006. |
|
(8) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 13.0% or
12-Month
LIBOR plus 7.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
6-Month
LIBOR plus 11.0%; rate reflected is as of June 30, 2006. |
|
(10) |
|
Prospect Energy owns 100 shares of common stock in PEH
Stryker, Inc. (PEH Stryker), which represents 100%.
PEH Stryker holds 350 non-voting Class A preferred units in
Stryker Energy II, LLC (Stryker II), which
represents a 35% interest. Stryker II is the borrower on
the term note issued by Prospect Energy. Prospect Energy also
holds one warrant expiring 4/18/2025 for anti-dilution purposes. |
|
(11) |
|
There are several entities involved in the Whymore investment.
The senior secured debt is with C&A Construction, Inc.
(C&A), which owns the equipment. E&L
Construction, Inc. (E&L) leases the equipment
from C&A, employs the workers, is listed as the operator
with the Commonwealth of Kentucky, mines the coal, receives
revenues and pays all operating expenses. Whymore Coal Company,
Inc. (Whymore) applies for and holds permits on
behalf of E&L. Whymore and E&L are guarantors under
the C&A credit agreement with Prospect Energy. Prospect
Energy owns 4,285 Series A convertible preferred shares in
each of C&A, E&L and Whymore. |
|
(12) |
|
Interest rate is the greater of 15.0% or
5-Year US
Treasury Note plus 11.5%; rate reflected is as of June 30,
2006. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-15
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements
Prospect Capital Corporation (Prospect Capital or
the Company), formerly known as Prospect Energy
Corporation, a Maryland corporation, was organized on
April 13, 2004 and is a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940
Act). On July 27, 2004, the Company completed its
initial public offering (IPO) and sold
7,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per
share, less underwriting discounts and commissions totaling
$1.05 per share. Since the IPO, the Company has had an exercise
of an over-allotment option with respect to the IPO on
August 27, 2004, a public offering on August 10, 2006,
and subsequent exercise of an over-allotment option on
August 28, 2006. On December 13, 2006, the Company
priced a public offering of 6,000,000 shares of common
stock at $17.70 per share, raising $106,200 in gross proceeds as
well as an additional 810,000 shares of common stock at
$17.70 per share raising $14,337 in gross proceeds in the
exercise of an over-allotment option on January 11, 2007.
The Company expects to use the net proceeds of its recent equity
offering to fund investments in portfolio companies and for
general corporate purposes.
Prospect Capital focuses primarily on investments in energy
companies and will invest, under normal circumstances, at least
80% of its net assets (including the amount of any borrowings
for investment purposes) in these companies. Prospect Capital
concentrates on making investments in energy companies having
annual revenues of less than $250,000 and in transaction sizes
of less than $30,000. In most cases, these companies are
privately held or have thinly traded public equity securities.
From time to time, the Company will not hold at least 80% of its
net assets in energy companies, especially immediately following
a public offering of shares of its common stock.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported
period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets,
creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any other
parameters used in determining these estimates could cause
actual results to differ.
The statements include portfolio investments at fair value of
$211,253 and $133,969 at March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2006, respectively. At March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2006, 70.0% and 123.7%, respectively, of the Companys net
assets represented portfolio investments whose fair values have
been determined by the board of directors in good faith in the
absence of readily available market values. Because of the
inherent uncertainty of valuation, the board of directors
determined values may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for the
investments, and the differences could be material.
Interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with
GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the
requirements for reporting on
Form 10-Q
and Article 6 or 10 of
Regulation S-X,
as appropriate.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Capital:
Investments:
a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
b) Valuation:
1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
F-16
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
2) Short-term investments that mature in 60 days or
less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at
amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized
cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date
of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to
maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at
maturity and cost. Short-term securities that mature in more
than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process,
which is under the direction of our Board of Directors.
The factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in interest rates, the financial environment in which the
portfolio company operates, comparisons to securities of similar
publicly traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the
inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of
investments that do not have a readily available market value,
the fair value of these investments may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for such investments, and any such differences could be
material.
As part of the fair valuation process, the Audit Committee
reviews the preliminary evaluations prepared by the independent
valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors. Management and
the independent valuation firm respond to the preliminary
evaluation to reflect comments provided by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews the final valuation report and makes
a recommendation to the Board of Directors based on its analysis
of the methodologies employed and the various weights that
should be accorded to each portion of the valuation as well as
factors that the independent valuation firm and management may
not have included in their evaluation process. The Board of
Directors then evaluates the Audit Committee recommendations and
undertakes a similar analysis to determine the fair value of
each investment in the portfolio in good faith.
4) The Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) has recently issued a new pronouncement
addressing fair value measurements, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Number 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). This statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157
does not become effective until November 2007 and is not
expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
d) Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium
and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis.
Origination, closing
and/or
commitment fees associated with investments in portfolio
companies are accreted into interest income over the respective
terms of the applicable loans. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any prepayment penalties and unamortized loan
origination, closing and commitment fees are recorded as
interest income.
e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
f) Loans are placed on non-accrual status when principal or
interest payments are past due 90 days or more or when
there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be
collected. Accrued interest is
F-17
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status.
Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be
recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon
managements judgment. Non-accrual loans are restored to
accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and
in managements judgment, are likely to remain current. As
of March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, less than 0.01%
and none, respectively of the Companys net assets are in
non-accrual status.
g) The Company includes Net Profits Interest, Prepayment
Penalties not related to loans, Deal Deposit Income and
Overriding Royalty Interests as Other Income on the Statement of
Operations.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
Prospect Capital has elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company and intends to continue to comply with the
requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code), applicable to regulated investment companies.
We are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment
company taxable income and intend to distribute (or retain
through a deemed distribution) all of our investment company
taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore,
we have made no provision for income taxes. The character of
income and gains that we will distribute is determined in
accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from
GAAP. Book and tax basis differences relating to stockholder
dividends and distributions and other permanent book and tax
differences are reclassified to paid-in capital.
If the Company does not distribute (or is not deemed to have
distributed) at least 98% of its annual taxable income in the
year earned, the Company will generally be required to pay an
excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98% of the
Companys annual taxable income exceeds the distributions
from such taxable income for the year. To the extent that the
Company determines that its estimated current year annual
taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year
dividend distributions from such taxable income, the Company
accrues excise taxes, if any, on estimated excess taxable income
as taxable income is earned using an annual effective excise tax
rate. The annual effective excise tax rate is determined by
dividing the estimated annual excise tax by the estimated annual
taxable income.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, which establishes that a tax position taken
or expected to be taken in a tax return is to be recognized in
the financial statements when it is more likely than not, based
on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained
upon examination. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company does not
believe that the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material
impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
Dividends
and Distributions:
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend is approved by the board of directors each quarter and
is generally based upon managements estimate of our
earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Consolidation:
As an investment company, Prospect Capital only consolidates
subsidiaries that are also investment companies. At
March 31, 2007 and at March 31, 2006, Prospect Capital
did not have any consolidated subsidiaries.
In September 2006, the FASB cleared the AICPA Statement of
Position
No. 07-1,
Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide
Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and
Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies
(SOP 07-1)
for issuance.
SOP 07-1
addresses whether the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit
and Accounting Guide Investment Companies
F-18
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
may be applied to an entity by clarifying the definition of an
investment company and whether those accounting principles may
be retained by a parent company in consolidation or by and
investor in the application method of accounting.
SOP 07-1
applies to the later of (1) reporting periods beginning on
or after December 15, 2007 or (2) the first permitted
early adoption date of the FASBs fair value option
statement. The adoption of
SOP 07-1
is not expected to have a material impact on our combined
financial statements.
Financing
Costs:
The Company records origination expenses related to its credit
facility as prepaid assets. These expenses are deferred and
amortized as part of interest expense using the straight-line
method over the stated life of the facility.
The Company records registration expenses related to Shelf
filings as prepaid assets. These expenses are charged as a
reduction of capital upon utilization, in accordance with
Section 8.24 of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for
Investment Companies.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements:
The Company follows FASB Interpretation Number 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. (FIN 45).
FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosure requirements of a
guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about
its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It
also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, for those guarantees that are covered by FIN 45,
for ability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in
issuing certain guarantees. FIN 45 did not have a material
effect on the financial statements. Refer to Note 3 for
further discussion of guarantees and indemnification agreements.
Per
Share Information:
Basic earnings per common share are calculated using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period presented.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
At March 31, 2007, approximately 70.0% of our net assets or
about $211,253 was invested in nineteen long-term portfolio
investments and 33.0% of our net assets was invested in money
market funds. The remainder (3.0%) of our net assets represented
liabilities in excess of other assets. At March 31, 2006,
approximately 89.5% of our net assets or about $93,560 was
invested in nine long-term portfolio investments and 10.2% of
our net assets was invested in money market funds and other
short-term investments with the remaining 0.3% representing
other assets in excess of liabilities. Prospect Capital is a
non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. We
classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the
1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the
ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed
to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated
investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser
degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of
5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another
person. The Company owns a controlling interest in Advantage
Oilfield Group, Ltd. (AOG), Gas Solutions Holdings,
Inc. (GSHI), Genesis Coal Corp.
(Genesis), NRG Manufacturing, Inc.
(NRG), Worcester Energy Company, Inc.
(WECO) and Whymore Coal Company
(Whymore). The Company also owns an affiliated
interest in Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC (AEH)
and Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc. (Iron Horse). The
Company has no other controlled or affiliated investments. At
March 31, 2006 the Company held a controlling interest in
GSHI and WECO and had no other controlled or affiliated
investments.
F-19
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
GSHI has indemnified Prospect Capital against any legal action
arising from its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. Prospect
Capital has incurred approximately $1,753 in fees associated
with a legal action through March 31, 2007, and GSHI has
reimbursed Prospect Capital the entire amount. Of the $1,753
reimbursement, $15 and $129 is reflected as Dividend income,
Controlled entities on the accompanying statement of operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006, respectively, and $136 and $772 for the
nine months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006,
respectively,
Debt placements and interests in non-voting equity securities
with an original cost basis of approximately $19,699 and
$106,846 were acquired during the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2007, respectively. Debt repayments and sales of
equity securities with an original cost basis of approximately
$7,731 and $26,148 were disposed during the three and nine
months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. Debt placements
and interests in non-voting equity securities with an original
cost basis of approximately $14,832 and $40,121 were acquired
during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006,
respectively. Debt repayments and sales of equity securities
with an original cost basis of approximately $0 and $3,470 were
disposed of during the three and nine months ended
March 31, 2006, respectively.
During the last six months, coal prices for Central Appalachian
coal softened and have recovered only slightly due to mild
winter weather and utility inventory surpluses. Marginal spot
prices for coal have fallen to below operating costs for many of
the smaller coal producers in that region. Genesis has a firm
coal sales contract valid through all of 2007 with fixed pricing
above both current spot market levels and operating costs.
Genesis continues to sell coal under that contract. Whymore
currently is selling coal on a spot basis to industrial users,
which pay above the average utility spot price. These industrial
customers are paying above Whymores operating costs, as
well. Unity is currently not operating. While both Genesis and
Whymore are not free of market risk and the risk of loss of
capital due to these market conditions, cost cutting and revenue
enhancing efforts at the companies, recent upward movements in
demand and pricing due to colder weather in late winter, and
production cuts at other producers may help to improve
Genesis and Whymores operating margins. We are
looking at opportunities to take advantage of the current
depressed pricing environment through acquisitions at favorable
prices.
With respect to Unity, discussions are underway between Unity,
Prospect Capital, the second lien holder, and Texas Capital, the
senior lender whose exposure has been reduced to
$1.35 million, and Unity regarding liquifying the last
remaining saleable property in the collateral package which
consists of land, coal inventory, and the refuse area. According
to Unity, the sale could yield up to $195,000. Prospect Capital
believes that Unity principals would then have to pay off the
remaining debt to Texas Capital, making Prospect Capital the
senior most secured lender. Prospect Capital has declined a
buyout offer from Unity principals for a nominal amount.
From time to time, the Company provides guarantees for portfolio
companies for payments to counterparties, usually as an
alternative to investing additional capital. Currently,
guarantees are outstanding only for two portfolio companies
categorized as Control Investments, which are not deemed by
management to be material individually or in the aggregate.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Organizational
and Offering Expenses
|
A portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and
the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was used
for organizational and offering expenses of approximately $125
and $1,386, respectively. Organizational expenses were expensed
as incurred. Offering expenses were charged against paid-in
capital in excess of par. All organizational and offering
expenses were borne by Prospect Capital.
A portion of the net proceeds of our August secondary offering
and the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was
used for offering expenses of approximately $594. A portion of
the net proceeds of our December secondary offering and the
subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option in January 2007
was
F-20
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
used for offering expenses of approximately $275. Offering
expenses were charged against paid-in capital in excess of par.
All offering expenses were borne by Prospect Capital.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Related
Party Agreements and Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Capital has entered into an investment advisory and
management agreement with Prospect Management (the
Investment Advisory Agreement) under which the
Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of
Prospect Capitals board of directors, manages the
day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory
services to, Prospect Capital. Under the terms of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, our Investment Adviser: (i) determines
the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the
changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such
changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the
structure of the investments we make (including performing due
diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); and
(iii) closes and monitors investments we make.
Prospect Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from Prospect Capital, consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of
2.00% on Prospect Capitals gross assets (including amounts
borrowed). For services rendered under the Investment Advisory
Agreement during the period commencing from the closing of
Prospect Capitals initial public offering through and
including the first six months of operations, the base
management fee was payable monthly in arrears. For services
currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the
base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base
management fee is calculated based on the average value of
Prospect Capitals gross assets at the end of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters (the closing of Prospect
Capitals initial public offering was treated as a quarter
end for these purposes) and appropriately adjusted for any share
issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
Base management fees for any partial month or quarter are
appropriately pro rated. The total base management fees earned
by and paid to Prospect Management during the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 were $1,531 and
$521, respectively, and during the nine months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 were $3,715 and
$1,554, respectively.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income for the immediately preceding calendar
quarter. For this purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment
income means interest income, dividend income and any other
income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing
managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination,
structuring, diligence and consulting fees and other fees that
Prospect Capital receives from portfolio companies) accrued
during the calendar quarter, minus Prospect Capitals
operating expenses for the quarter (including the base
management fee, expenses payable under the Administration
Agreement described below, and any interest expense and
dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock,
but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net
investment income includes, in the case of investments with a
deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt
instruments with payment in kind interest and zero coupon
securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in
cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include
any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or
unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive
fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the
value of Prospect Capitals net assets at the end of the
immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a
hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter (7.00% annualized).
Previously, our Investment Adviser had voluntarily agreed that
for each fiscal quarter from January 1, 2005 to
March 31, 2007, the quarterly hurdle rate will be equal to
the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal to
the sum of 25.0% of the daily average of the quoted
treasury rate for each month in the immediately preceding
two quarters
F-21
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means the yield to
maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond equivalent basis) at
the time of computation for Five Year U.S. Treasury notes
with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most
recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H). These
calculations will be appropriately pro rated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter. The voluntary agreement
by the Investment Adviser that the hurdle rate be fluctuating
for each fiscal quarter after January 1, 2005 (as discussed
above) has been terminated by the Investment Adviser for the
June 30, 2007, quarter and beyond.
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. Prospect
Capital pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with
respect to Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which Prospect
Capitals pre-incentive fee net investment income does not
exceed the hurdle rate;
|
|
|
|
100.00% of Prospect Capitals pre-incentive fee net
investment income with respect to that portion of such
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
the hurdle rate but is less than 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate); and
|
|
|
|
20.00% of the amount of Prospect Capitals pre-incentive
fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 125.00% of the
quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized
assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle rate).
|
These calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals
20.00% of Prospect Capitals realized capital gains for the
calendar year, if any, computed net of all realized capital
losses and unrealized capital depreciation at the end of such
year. In determining the capital gains incentive fee payable to
the Investment Adviser, Prospect Capital calculates the
aggregate realized capital gains, aggregate realized capital
losses and aggregate unrealized capital depreciation, as
applicable, with respect to each of the investments in its
portfolio. For this purpose, aggregate realized capital gains,
if any, equals the sum of the differences between the net sales
price of each investment, when sold, and the original cost of
such investment since inception. Aggregate realized capital
losses equal the sum of the amounts by which the net sales price
of each investment, when sold, is less than the original cost of
such investment since inception. Aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation equals the sum of the difference, if negative,
between the valuation of each investment as of the applicable
date and the original cost of such investment. At the end of the
applicable period, the amount of capital gains that serves as
the basis for Prospect Capitals calculation of the capital
gains incentive fee equals the aggregate realized capital gains
less aggregate realized capital losses and less aggregate
unrealized capital depreciation with respect to its portfolio of
investments. If this number is positive at the end of such
period, then the capital gains incentive fee for such period is
equal to 20.00% of such amount, less the aggregate amount of any
capital gains incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in
all prior periods.
$1,754 and $533 income incentive fees were earned for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006,
respectively, and $3,695 and $1,041 income incentive fees were
earned for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2006, respectively. No capital gains incentive
fees were earned were earned for the three or nine months ended
March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006.
F-22
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Capital has also entered into an Administration
Agreement with Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of)
administrative services and facilities for Prospect Capital. For
providing these services, Prospect Capital reimburses Prospect
Administration for Prospect Capitals allocable portion of
overhead incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent
and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance
officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs.
Under this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with
office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and
record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect
Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of,
our required administrative services, which include, among other
things, being responsible for the financial records that we are
required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders
and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect
Administration assists us in determining and publishing our net
asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax
returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to us by others. Under the Administration Agreement,
Prospect Administration also provides on our behalf managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required
to provide such assistance. The Administration Agreement may be
terminated by either party without penalty upon
60 days written notice to the other party. Prospect
Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our Investment
Adviser.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Capital for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administrations
services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as
administrator for Prospect Capital.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our board
of directors, has engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC
(Vastardis) to serve as the sub-administrator of
Prospect Capital to perform certain services required of
Prospect Administration. This engagement began in May 2005 and
ran on a month-to-month basis at the rate of $25 annually,
payable monthly. Under the sub-administration agreement,
Vastardis provides Prospect Capital with office facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at
such facilities. Vastardis also conducts relations with
custodians, depositories, transfer agents, dividend disbursing
agents, other stockholder servicing agents, accountants,
attorneys, underwriters, brokers and dealers, corporate
fiduciaries, insurers, banks and such other persons in any such
other capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable. Vastardis
provides reports to the Administrator and the Directors of its
performance of obligations and furnishes advice and
recommendations with respect to such other aspects of the
business and affairs of Prospect Capital as it shall determine
to be desirable. Under the revised and renewed
sub-administration agreement, Vastardis also provides the
service of William E. Vastardis as the Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) of the Fund. This service was formerly
provided at the rate of $225 annually, payable monthly. In May
2006, the engagement was revised and renewed as an asset-based
fee with a $400 annual minimum, payable monthly. Vastardis does
not provide any advice or recommendation relating to the
securities and other assets that Prospect Capital should
purchase, retain or sell or any other investment advisory
services to Prospect Capital. Vastardis is responsible for the
financial and other records that either Prospect Capital (or the
Administrator on behalf of Prospect Capital) is required to
maintain and prepares reports to stockholders, and reports and
other materials filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, Vastardis assists Prospect Capital in
determining and publishing Prospect Capitals net asset
value, overseeing the preparation and filing of Prospect
Capitals tax returns, and the printing and dissemination
of reports to
F-23
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
stockholders of Prospect Capital, and generally overseeing the
payment of Prospect Capitals expenses and the performance
of administrative and professional services rendered to Prospect
Capital by others.
Under the sub-administration agreement, Vastardis and its
officers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons,
members, and any other person or entity affiliated with
Vastardis, are not liable to the Administrator or Prospect
Capital for any action taken or omitted to be taken by Vastardis
in connection with the performance of any of its duties or
obligations or otherwise as sub-administrator for the
Administrator on behalf of Prospect Capital. The agreement also
provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or
negligence in the performance of Vastardis duties or by
reason of the reckless disregard of Vastardis duties and
obligations, Vastardis and its officers, partners, agents,
employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or
entity affiliated with Vastardis are entitled to indemnification
from the Administrator and Prospect Capital. All damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
incurred in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed
action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an
action or suit by or in the right of the Administrator or
Prospect Capital or the security holders of Prospect Capital)
arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of
Vastardis duties or obligations under the agreement or
otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf
of Prospect Capital.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We have received $193 and
$392 in managerial assistance for the three and nine month
periods ended March 31, 2007, respectively, and $71 and
$148 for the three and nine month periods ended March 31,
2006, respectively. These fees are paid to the Administrator.
F-24
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 6. Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2006
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2007
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Per Share Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
15.24
|
|
|
$
|
14.69
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
Costs related to the initial
public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Costs related to the secondary
public offering
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share issuances related to
dividend reinvestment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
Realized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
Net increase in net assets as a
result of secondary public offering
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(1.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
15.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
15.18
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of
period
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
Total return based on market
value(2)
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
|
|
37.35
|
%
|
Total return based on net asset
value(2)
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.19
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
19,879,231
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
|
|
19,879,231
|
|
|
|
7,061,940
|
|
Average weighted shares
outstanding for period
|
|
|
19,697,473
|
|
|
|
7,055,176
|
|
|
|
14,341,811
|
|
|
|
7,055,125
|
|
Ratio / Supplemental
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in
thousands)
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
|
$
|
301,767
|
|
|
$
|
104,602
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating
expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
6.79
|
%
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of net operating
income to average net assets
|
|
|
9.23
|
%
|
|
|
8.13
|
%
|
|
|
9.36
|
%
|
|
|
7.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights are based on weighted average shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Capitals dividend
reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Capitals dividend reinvestment plan. The total
returns are not annualized. |
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of
its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We continue to
defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that
resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
F-25
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Capital with a
complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District
for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP
alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Capital
breached its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered
with DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a
subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with
Prospect Capitals alleged agreement in September 2004 to
loan DGP funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions,
Ltd. for approximately $26,000. The complaint seeks relief not
limited to $100,000. We believe that the DGP complaint is
frivolous and without merit, and intend to defend the matter
vigorously. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate
Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, issued a
recommendation that the court grant Prospect Capitals
Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On
February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division issued an order granting Prospect
Capitals Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims
by Dallas Gas Partners, L.P., against Prospect Capital
Corporation. DGP has appealed this decision.
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a
complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging
discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress
and other claims. This officer seeks economic reinstatement and
other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA issued findings,
including an order dismissing this complaint. The complainant
has filed written objections to the order and had a hearing
before an Administrative Law Judge on March 16, 2006. On
May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge issued a Decision
and Order granting Summary Decision and dismissing the
complaint, which the former officer has appealed. The Company
does not believe that these claims, even if ultimately resolved
against the Company, would be material. The Company believes the
complaint is frivolous and without merit and intends to defend
itself vigorously.
From time to time, we may become involved in various
investigations, claims and legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. These matters may relate to
intellectual property, employment, tax, regulation, contract or
other matters. The resolution of these matters as they arise
will be subject to various uncertainties and, even if such
claims are without merit, could result in the expenditure of
significant financial and managerial resources.
|
|
Note 8.
|
Revolving
Credit Agreement
|
On February 21, 2006, Prospect Capital entered into a
$20,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the
Previous Credit Facility) with Bank of Montreal as
administrative agent and Harris Nesbitt Corp. as sole lead
arranger and sole book runner. The Previous Credit Facility
supplemented the Companys equity capital and provided
funding for additional portfolio investments. All amounts
borrowed under the Previous Credit Facility would have matured,
and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder would have been
due and payable within six months of the date of the borrowing.
The Previous Credit Facility had a termination date of
August 21, 2006. On May 11, 2006, the Previous Credit
Facility was increased to $30,000.
On July 26, 2006, we closed a $50,000 revolving credit
facility (the Facility) with HSH Nordbank AG as
administrative agent and sole lead arranger, replacing the
$30,000 Previous Credit Facility. This Facility was used,
together with our equity capital, to make additional long-term
investments. Interest on borrowings under the Facility is
charged, at our option, at either (i) LIBOR plus the
applicable spread, ranging from 200 to 250 basis points
(the refinanced facility being at 250 basis points over
LIBOR), or (ii) the greater of the lender prime rate or the
federal funds effective rate plus 50 to 100 basis points.
The applicable spread decreases as our equity base increases.
As of March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, we had no
amounts drawn down on the Facility.
F-26
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Financial
Statements (Continued)
On April 12, 2007, Prospect Capital provided acquisition
and growth financing of approximately $12.2 million to ESA
Environmental Specialists, Inc. (ESA), located in
Charlotte, North Carolina. Prospect Capitals investment is
in the form of a senior secured debt instrument with a first
lien on all assets of ESA, including receivables and real
estate. Prospect Capital has received a significant equity
ownership in ESA as part of its investment.
|
|
Note 10.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (in thousands except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Investment Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share*
|
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
5,799
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
2,977
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
6,432
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
12,069
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Per share amounts are calculated using weighted average shares
during period. |
F-27
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Prospect
Energy Corporation
New York, NY
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Prospect
Energy Corporation as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, including
the schedule of investments, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
two years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and for the period
from April 13, 2004 (inception) through June 30, 2004.
These financial statements and financial highlights are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits, which included confirmation of
securities at June 30, 2006 by correspondence with the
custodian and issuers, provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Prospect Energy Corporation
at June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the two years ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 and for the period from
April 13, 2004 (inception) through June 30, 2004, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the schedules present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Prospect Energy Corporations internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, based
on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Comission (COSO) and our report
dated September 25, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
New York, NY
September 25, 2006
As of the end of the period covered by this report, Prospect
Energy carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with
the participation of Prospect Energys management,
including Prospect Energys chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of Prospect Energys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
1934 Act)). Based on that evaluation, as of
September 27, 2006, the chief executive officer and the
chief financial officer have concluded that Prospect
Energys current disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them of material information
relating to Prospect Energy that is required to be disclosed by
Prospect Energy in the reports it files or submits under the
1934 Act.
F-28
Report of
Management on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for
performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to assets of the company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2006 based upon criteria in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on our assessment, management
determined that the Companys internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2006 based
on the criteria on Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by COSO.
Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2006 has been audited by BDO Seidman LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which appears herein.
There have been no changes in Prospect Energys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the three
months ended June 30, 2006 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
F-29
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Prospect Energy Corporation
New York, New York
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Prospect Energy Corporation (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Prospect
Energy Corporation maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Also in our opinion, Prospect Energy Corporation
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
balance sheets of Prospect Energy Corporation as of
June 30, 2006 and 2005, including the schedule of
investments and the related statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the two years
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and for the period from
April 13, 2004 (inception) through June 30, 2004, and
our report dated September 25, 2006 expressed an
unqualified opinion.
New York, New York
September 25, 2006
F-30
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments at fair value
(cost $125,201 and $87,524, respectively,
Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in controlled entity at
fair value (cost $39,759 and $23,327, respectively)
|
|
$
|
49,585
|
|
|
$
|
29,500
|
|
Investments in affiliated
entities, at fair value (cost $25,329 and
$ , respectively)
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in uncontrolled and
unaffiliated entities at fair value (cost $60,113
and $64,197, respectively)
|
|
|
60,663
|
|
|
|
64,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments at fair value
|
|
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
93,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash held in segregated account
(Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
Accrued interest and dividend
receivable
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Loan principal receivable
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from Gas Solutions Holdings,
Inc. (Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Due from Prospect Capital
Management, LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from Prospect Administration,
LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from broker
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Deferred financing fees
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred offering costs
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
138,480
|
|
|
$
|
103,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Credit facility payable
|
|
$
|
28,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Due to Prospect Capital
Management, LLC (Note 5)
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
30,210
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Notes 3 and 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
(Notes 1, 4 and 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.001 per
share (100,000,000 and 100,000,000 common shares authorized,
respectively, 7,069,873 and 7,055,100 issued and outstanding,
respectively)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Paid-in capital in excess of par
|
|
|
97,266
|
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
Undistributed (distributions in
excess of) net investment income
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
Realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
10,377
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
138,480
|
|
|
$
|
103,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per share
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
periods presentation |
See notes to financial statements.
F-31
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Controlled Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Gas gathering
and processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,875
|
|
|
$
|
14,700
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Subordinated secured
note, 18.00% due 12/23/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,275
|
|
|
|
33,100
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.
|
|
Maine/Wood
processing and
biomass power
generation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
12.50% due 1/31/2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,721
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,484
|
|
|
|
16,485
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Controlled
Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,759
|
|
|
|
49,585
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated
Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Pipeline and
Facility construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
15.00% due 5/30/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
15,926
|
|
|
|
15,926
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC
|
|
West Virginia/Energy
Construction services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred equity
interest
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Preferred
equity interest, Expiring 2/14/16
|
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
14.00%, 3.00% PIK, due 1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron Horse Coiled Tubing, Inc.
|
|
Alberta, Canada/
Coiled tubing
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
15.00% due 4/19/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Affiliated
Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
25,329
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncontrolled and Unaffiliated
Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arctic Acquisition Corporation
|
|
Texas/Oilfield
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Common
Shares, Expiring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
596,251
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Warrants, Preferred
Shares, Expiring 7/19/2012
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
13.00% due 6/15/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,009
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
|
|
9,096
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Energy, LLC
|
|
Illinois/Ethanol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
10.00% plus LIBOR, due 3/31/2014
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlevoix Energy Trading, LLC
|
|
Michigan/Natural gas
marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
12.50% due 3/31/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
5,422
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conquest Cherokee, LLC
|
|
Tennessee/Oil and
gas production
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
13.00% due 5/5/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genesis Coal Corporation
|
|
Kentucky/Coal
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Preferred
Shares, Expiring 1/31/2006
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
15.86% due 12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
5/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Warrants Expiring
12/31/2010
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
1/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
2/28/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
3/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
4/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
5/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Expiring
6/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
30,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares,
Registered
|
|
|
|
|
732,528
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Common shares,
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
139,926
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred units
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
13.32% due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,330
|
|
|
|
13,139
|
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,609
|
|
|
|
14,608
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
|
|
Virginia/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated secured
note, 15.00%, 15.00% PIK due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal Company
|
|
Kentucky/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
15.00% due 3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,008
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,314
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,593
|
|
|
|
133,969
|
|
|
|
123.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Prime Obligation
Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
1,607,893
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Total Uncontrolled and
Unaffiliated Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,113
|
|
|
|
60.663
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments at Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,201
|
|
|
$
|
135,577
|
|
|
|
125.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the board
of directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is a wholly owned investment of
Prospect Energy. |
F-33
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
Locale/Industry
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Portfolio Investments(1)
Controlled Entity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Solutions Holdings, Inc.(3)
|
|
Texas/Gas gathering
and processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
|
$
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Subordinated secured
note, 18.00% due 12/22/2011
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,327
|
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Controlled
Entity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,327
|
|
|
|
29,500
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncontrolled and Unaffiliated
Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miller Petroleum, Inc.
|
|
Tennessee/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Expiring
5/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
12.50% due 8/21/2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Systems, Inc.
|
|
Texas/Gas gathering
and processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, Expiring
2/2/2010
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
14.00% due 2/3/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stryker Energy II, LLC
|
|
Ohio/Oil and
gas production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred units
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Senior secured note,
14.12% due 4/8/2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,330
|
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,647
|
|
|
|
9,663
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unity Virginia Holdings, LLC
|
|
Virginia/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, 100%,
non-voting
|
|
|
|
|
1,00
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Subordinated secured
note, 17.65% due 1/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whymore Coal
|
|
Kentucky/Coal
production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock,
Convertible, Series A
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note,
15.00% due 3/31/2009
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
5,008
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
|
|
55,030
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
Securities
|
|
Yield to Maturity(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due 7/7/2005
|
|
2.52%
|
|
$
|
5,518
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due 7/14/2005
|
|
2.49%
|
|
$
|
9,514
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
U.S. Treasury Bill due 7/21/2005
|
|
2.55%
|
|
$
|
22,261
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
Total U.S. Government
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,247
|
|
|
|
37,247
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Prime Obligation
Fund (Class Y)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587,854
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Total Uncontrolled and
Unaffiliated Entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,197
|
|
|
|
64,366
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments at Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,524
|
|
|
$
|
93,866
|
|
|
|
91.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The securities in which Prospect Energy has invested were
acquired in transactions that were exempt from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act. These securities may be resold only
in transactions that are exempt from registration under the
Securities Act. |
|
(2) |
|
Fair value is determined by or under the direction of the board
of directors of Prospect Energy (Note 2). |
|
(3) |
|
Gas Solutions Holdings Inc. is wholly owned and controlled
investments of Prospect Energy. |
|
(4) |
|
Yield to maturity at time of purchase. |
See notes to financial statements.
F-34
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period from
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) through
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, uncontrolled and
unaffiliated entities
|
|
$
|
6,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest income, controlled
entities
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, affiliated
entities
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
12,367
|
|
|
|
4,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income, controlled
entities (Note 3)
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income, uncontrolled and
unaffiliated entities
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividend income
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
income
|
|
|
16,869
|
|
|
|
8,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base management fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income incentive fee (Note 5)
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment advisory fees
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and credit
facility costs
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration costs (Note 5)
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal fees (Note 3)
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation services
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other professional fees
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational costs (Note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
8,311
|
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
(loss)
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net increase in
stockholders equity per common share resulting from operations
(Note 6)
|
|
$
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-35
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENT
OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
in Excess of)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Application
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance, April 13, 2004
(inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Net decrease in stockholders
equity from operations for the period from April 13, 2004
(inception) to June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Balance, June 30, 2004
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from
public offering (net of underwriting costs)
|
|
|
7,055,000
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
98,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
Offering Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the year ended
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.38 per
share) and paid to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2005
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
96,955
|
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
102,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
Dividends declared ($1.12 per
share) and paid to stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,904
|
)
|
Shares issued in connection with
dividend reinvestment
|
|
|
14,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2006
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
97,266
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
10,377
|
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-36
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period
|
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
For the Twelve
|
|
|
from April 13, 2004
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
(Inception) Through
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in stockholders
equity resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
12,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
increase in stockholders equity resulting from operations
to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on
investments
|
|
|
(4,035
|
)
|
|
|
(6,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of loan origination
fees
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(1,757,247
|
)
|
|
|
(701,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Sale / refinancing of investments
|
|
|
1,720,481
|
|
|
|
614,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued interest
receivable
|
|
|
(1,446
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in loan principal
receivable
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in due from Gas
Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due from Prospect
Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due from Prospect
Administration, LLC
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in due from broker
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred financing fees
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred offering costs
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other current
liabilities
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in due to
Prospect Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(30,494
|
)
|
|
|
(84,729
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Offering costs from the issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(7,663
|
)
|
|
|
(2,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
20,907
|
|
|
|
94,315
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in
cash
|
|
|
(9,587
|
)
|
|
|
9,586
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,587
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing
activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in connection with
dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-37
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements
Prospect Energy Corporation (Prospect Energy or the
Company), a Maryland corporation, was organized on
April 13, 2004 and is a closed-end investment company that
has filed an election to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Act of 1940. On July 27, 2004,
the Company completed its initial public offering and sold
7,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $15.00 per
share, less underwriting discounts and commissions totaling
$1.05 per share. On August 27, 2004, an additional
55,000 shares were issued for a price of $15.00 per share,
less underwriting discounts and commissions of $1.05 per share
in connection with the exercise of an over-allotment option with
respect to the offering.
Prospect Energy Corporation focuses primarily on investments in
private and microcap public companies. At June 30, 2006,
approximately 123.7% of our net assets or about
$134.0 million was invested in fifteen long-term portfolio
investments and 1.5% of our net assets in a money market fund.
The remaining (25.2%) of our net assets represented liabilities
in excess of other assets. Prospect Energy is a non-diversified
company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Prospect Energy
concentrates on making investments in companies having annual
revenues of less than $250.0 million and in transaction
sizes of less than $30.0 million. In most cases, these
companies are privately held or have thinly traded public equity
securities.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
primarily of normal recurring adjustments) have been made that
are necessary to present fairly the financial position of the
Company.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported
period. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets,
creditworthiness of our portfolio companies and any other
parameters used in determining these estimates could cause
actual results to differ.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently
applied by Prospect Energy:
Investments:
a) Security transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
b) Valuation:
1) Investments for which market quotations are readily
available are valued at such market quotations.
2) Short-term investments which mature in 60 days or
less, such as United States Treasury Bills, are valued at
amortized cost, which approximates market value. The amortized
cost method involves valuing a security at its cost on the date
of purchase and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to
maturity of the difference between the principal amount due at
maturity and cost. Short-term securities which mature in more
than 60 days are valued at current market quotations by an
independent pricing service or at the mean between the bid and
ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if
available, or otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary
market dealer). Investments in money market mutual funds are
valued at their net asset value as of the close of business on
the day of valuation.
3) It is expected that most of the investments in the
Companys portfolio will not have readily available market
values. Debt and equity securities whose market prices are not
readily available are valued at fair value, with the assistance
of an independent valuation service, using a documented
valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process
which is under the direction of our board of directors. The
factors that may be taken into account in fairly valuing
investments include, as relevant, the portfolio companys
ability to make payments, its estimated earnings and projected
discounted cash flows, the nature and realizable value of any
collateral, the sensitivity of the investments to fluctuations
in
F-38
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
interest rates, the financial environment in which the portfolio
company operates, comparisons to securities of similar publicly
traded companies and other relevant factors. Due to the inherent
uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do
not have a readily available market value, the fair value of
these investments may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for such
investments, and any such differences could be material.
c) Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are
calculated using the specific identification method.
d) Interest income adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount is recorded on an accrual basis.
e) Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.
f) Loan origination, facility, commitments, consent and
other advance fees received by us on loan agreements or other
investments are accreted into income over the term of the loan.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
recently issued a new pronouncement addressing fair value
measurements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number
157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157). This statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is not
expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
Prospect Energy has elected to be treated as a regulated
investment company and intends to continue to comply with the
requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code), applicable to regulated investment companies.
We are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment
company taxable income and intend to distribute (or retain
through a deemed distribution) all of our investment company
taxable income and net capital gain to stockholders; therefore,
we have made no provision for income taxes.
The character of income and gains that we will distribute is
determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from GAAP.
Dividends
and Distributions:
Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded
on the ex-dividend date. The amount, if any, to be paid as a
dividend is approved by the board of directors each quarter and
is generally based upon managements estimate of our
earnings for the quarter. Net realized capital gains, if any,
are distributed at least annually.
Consolidation:
As an investment company, Prospect Energy only consolidates
subsidiaries which are also investment companies. At
June 30, 2006 Prospect Energy did not have any consolidated
subsidiaries.
Guarantees
and Indemnification Agreements:
The Company follows FASB Interpretation Number 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. (FIN 45).
FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosure requirements of a
guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about
its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It
also requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation
undertaken in issuing certain guarantees. FIN 45 did not
have a material effect on the financial statements. Refer to
Note 3 for further discussion of guarantees and
indemnification agreements.
F-39
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
Note 3.
|
Portfolio
Investments
|
We classify our investments by level of control. As defined in
the 1940 Act, control investments are those where there is the
ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed
to exist when a company or individual owns more than 25% or more
of the voting securities of an investee company. Affiliated
investments and affiliated companies are defined by a lesser
degree of influence and are deemed to exist through ownership of
5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another
person. The Company owns a controlling interest in GSHI and
Worcester Energy Company, Inc.. The company also owns an
affiliated interest in Advantage Oilfield Group, Ltd.,
Appalachian Energy Holdings, LLC and Iron Horse Coiled Tubing,
Inc. The Company has no other controlled or affiliated
investments.
GSHI has indemnified Prospect Energy against any legal action
arising from its investment in Gas Solutions, LP. Prospect
Energy has incurred approximately $1.617 million in fees
associated with this legal action through June 30, 2006.
GSHI has reimbursed Prospect Energy $1.617 million as of
June 30, 2006. The $1.617 million reimbursement is
reflected as Dividend income, controlled entities on the
accompanying statement of operations for the year ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 and for the period
from April 13, 2004 (inception) through June 30, 2004.
Debt placements and interests in non-voting equity securities
with an original cost basis of approximately $74.0 million
were acquired during the twelve months ended June 30, 2006.
Debt repayments and sales of equity securities with an original
cost basis of approximately $9.6 million were disposed
during the twelve months ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
Note 4.
|
Organizational
and Offering Expenses
|
A portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and
the subsequent exercise of the over-allotment option was used
for organizational and offering expenses of approximately
$0.125 million and $1.386 million, respectively.
Organizational expenses were expensed as incurred. Offering
expenses were charged against paid-in capital in excess of par.
All organizational and offering expenses were borne by Prospect
Energy.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Related
Party Agreements And Transactions
|
Investment
Advisory Agreement
Prospect Energy has entered into an investment advisory and
management agreement with Prospect Management (the
Investment Advisory Agreement) under which the
Investment Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of
Prospect Energys board of directors, manages the
day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory
services to, Prospect Energy. Under the terms of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, our Investment Adviser: (i) determines
the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the
changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such
changes, (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the
structure of the investments we make (including performing due
diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); and
(iii) closes and monitors investments we make.
Prospect Managements services under the Investment
Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish
similar services to other entities so long as its services to us
are not impaired. For providing these services the Investment
Adviser receives a fee from Prospect Energy, consisting of two
components a base management fee and an incentive
fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of
2.00% on Prospect Energys gross assets (including amounts
borrowed). For services rendered under the Investment Advisory
Agreement during the period commencing from the closing of
Prospect Energys initial public offering through and
including the first six months of operations, the base
management fee was payable monthly in arrears. For services
currently rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the
base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base
management fee is calculated based on the average value of
Prospect Energys gross assets at the end of the two most
recently completed calendar quarters (the
F-40
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
closing of Prospect Energys initial public offering was
treated as a quarter end for these purposes) and appropriately
adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the
current calendar quarter. Base management fees for any partial
month or quarter are appropriately pro rated. The total base
management fees earned by and paid to Prospect Management during
the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005 were $2.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part, the income
incentive fee, is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
based on Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment
income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this
purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest
income, dividend income and any other income (including any
other fees (other than fees for providing managerial
assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring,
diligence and consulting fees and other fees that Prospect
Energy receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the
calendar quarter, minus Prospect Energys operating
expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee,
expenses payable under the Administration Agreement described
below, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued
and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive
fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the
case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as
original issue discount, debt instruments with payment in kind
interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we
have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment
income does not include any realized capital gains, realized
capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or
depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed
as a rate of return on the value of Prospect Energys net
assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter,
is compared to a hurdle rate of 1.75% per quarter
(7.00% annualized). However, our Investment Adviser has
voluntarily agreed that for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005, the quarterly hurdle rate will be equal to
the greater of (a) 1.75% and (b) a percentage equal to
the sum of 25.0% of the daily average of the quoted
treasury rate for each month in the immediately preceding
two quarters plus 0.50%. Quoted treasury rate means
the yield to maturity (calculated on a semi-annual bond
equivalent basis) at the time of computation for Five Year
U.S. Treasury notes with a constant maturity (as compiled
and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical
Release H). These calculations will be appropriately pro rated
for any period of less than three months and adjusted for any
share issuances or repurchases during the current quarter. The
voluntary agreement by the Investment Adviser that the hurdle
rate be fluctuating for each fiscal quarter after
January 1, 2005 (as discussed above) may be terminated by
the Investment Adviser at any time upon 90 days prior
notice.
The net investment income used to calculate this part of the
incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets
used to calculate the 2.00% base management fee. Prospect Energy
pays the Investment Adviser an income incentive fee with respect
to Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net investment
income in each calendar quarter as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which Prospect
Energys pre-incentive fee net investment income does not
exceed the hurdle rate;
|
|
|
|
100.00% of Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee net
investment income with respect to that portion of such
pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds
the hurdle rate but is less than 125.00% of the quarterly hurdle
rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized assuming a 7.00%
annualized hurdle rate); and
|
|
|
|
20.00% of the amount of Prospect Energys pre-incentive fee
net investment income, if any, that exceeds 125.00% of the
quarterly hurdle rate in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized
assuming a 7.00% annualized hurdle rate).
|
These calculations are appropriately pro rated for any period of
less than three months and adjusted for any share issuances or
repurchases during the current quarter.
The second part of the incentive fee, the capital gains
incentive fee, is determined and payable in arrears as of the
end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment
Advisory Agreement, as of the
F-41
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
termination date), and equals 20.00% of Prospect Energys
realized capital gains for the calendar year, if any, computed
net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital
depreciation at the end of such year. In determining the capital
gains incentive fee payable to the Investment Adviser, Prospect
Energy calculates the aggregate realized capital gains,
aggregate realized capital losses and aggregate unrealized
capital depreciation, as applicable, with respect to each of the
investments in its portfolio. For this purpose, aggregate
realized capital gains, if any, equals the sum of the
differences between the net sales price of each investment, when
sold, and the original cost of such investment since inception.
Aggregate realized capital losses equal the sum of the amounts
by which the net sales price of each investment, when sold, is
less than the original cost of such investment since inception.
Aggregate unrealized capital depreciation equals the sum of the
difference, if negative, between the valuation of each
investment as of the applicable date and the original cost of
such investment. At the end of the applicable period, the amount
of capital gains that serves as the basis for Prospect
Energys calculation of the capital gains incentive fee
equals the aggregate realized capital gains less aggregate
realized capital losses and less aggregate unrealized capital
depreciation with respect to its portfolio of investments. If
this number is positive at the end of such period, then the
capital gains incentive fee for such period is equal to 20.00%
of such amount, less the aggregate amount of any capital gains
incentive fees paid in respect of its portfolio in all prior
periods.
$1.8 million and no income incentive fees were earned for
the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005, respectively. No capital gains incentive fees were earned
for the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30,
2005.
Administration
Agreement
Prospect Energy has also entered into an Administration
Agreement with Prospect Administration, LLC (Prospect
Administration) under which Prospect Administration, among
other things, provides (or arranges for the provision of)
administrative services and facilities for Prospect Energy. For
providing these services, Prospect Energy reimburses Prospect
Administration for Prospect Energys allocable portion of
overhead incurred by Prospect Administration in performing its
obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent
and our allocable portion of the costs of our chief compliance
officer and chief financial officer and their respective staffs.
Under this agreement, Prospect Administration furnishes us with
office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and
record keeping services at such facilities. Prospect
Administration also performs, or oversees the performance of,
our required administrative services, which include, among other
things, being responsible for the financial records which we are
required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders
and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, Prospect
Administration assists us in determining and publishing our net
asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax
returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our
stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of our expenses
and the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to us by others. Under the Administration Agreement,
Prospect Administration also provides on our behalf managerial
assistance to those portfolio companies to which we are required
to provide such assistance. The Administration Agreement may be
terminated by either party without penalty upon
60 days written notice to the other party. Prospect
Administration is a wholly owned subsidiary of our Investment
Adviser.
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its
duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and
obligations, Prospect Administration and its officers, managers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and
any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to
indemnification from Prospect Energy for any damages,
liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
arising from the rendering of Prospect Administrations
services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as
administrator for Prospect Energy.
Prospect Administration, pursuant to the approval of our board
of directors, has engaged Vastardis Fund Services LLC
(VFS) to serve as the sub-administrator of Prospect
Energy to perform certain services
F-42
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
required of Prospect Administration. This engagement began in
May 2005 and ran on a month to month basis at the rate of
$25,000 annually, payable monthly. Under the sub-administration
agreement, VFS provides Prospect Energy with office facilities,
equipment, clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at
such facilities. VFS also conducts relations with custodians,
depositories, transfer agents, dividend disbursing agents, other
stockholder servicing agents, accountants, attorneys,
underwriters, brokers and dealers, corporate fiduciaries,
insurers, banks and such other persons in any such other
capacity deemed to be necessary or desirable. VFS provides
reports to the Administrator and the Directors of its
performance of obligations and furnishes advice and
recommendations with respect to such other aspects of the
business and affairs of Prospect Energy as it shall determine to
be desirable. Under the revised and renewed sub-administration
agreement, VFS also provides the service of William E. Vastardis
as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Fund.
This service was formerly provided at the rate of $225,000
annually, payable monthly. In May 2006, the engagement was
revised and renewed as an asset-based fee with a $400,000 annual
minimum, payable monthly. VFS does not provide any advice or
recommendation relating to the securities and other assets that
Prospect Energy should purchase, retain or sell or any other
investment advisory services to Prospect Energy. VFS is
responsible for the financial and other records that either
Prospect Energy (or the Administrator on behalf of Prospect
Energy) is required to maintain and prepares reports to
stockholders, and reports and other materials filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and provides on Prospect
Energys behalf significant managerial assistance to those
portfolio companies to which Prospect Energy is required to
provide such assistance under the Investment Company Act or
other applicable law. In addition, VFS assists Prospect Energy
in determining and publishing Prospect Energys net asset
value, overseeing the preparation and filing of Prospect
Energys tax returns, and the printing and dissemination of
reports to stockholders of Prospect Energy, and generally
overseeing the payment of Prospect Energys expenses and
the performance of administrative and professional services
rendered to Prospect Energy by others.
Under the sub-administration agreement, VFS and its officers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and
any other person or entity affiliated with VFS, is not liable to
the Administrator or Prospect Energy for any action taken or
omitted to be taken by VFS in connection with the performance of
any of its duties or obligations or otherwise as
sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf of Prospect
Energy. The agreement also provides that, absent willful
misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of
VFSs duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of
VFSs duties and obligations, VFS and its officers,
partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and
any other person or entity affiliated with VFS is entitled to
indemnification from the Administrator and Prospect Energy. All
damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement)
incurred in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed
action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an
action or suit by or in the right of the Administrator or
Prospect Energy or the security holders of Prospect Energy)
arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of
VFSs duties or obligations under the agreement or
otherwise as sub-administrator for the Administrator on behalf
of Prospect Energy.
Managerial
Assistance
As a business development company, we offer, and must provide
upon request, managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio
companies. This assistance could involve, among other things,
monitoring the operations of our portfolio companies,
participating in board and management meetings, consulting with
and advising officers of portfolio companies and providing other
organizational and financial guidance. We have received
$0.193 million in managerial assistance for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006. These fees are paid to the
Administrator.
F-43
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
Note 6.
|
Financial
Highlights
|
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
Per Share Data(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at beginning of
period
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Proceeds from initial public
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.95
|
|
Costs related to the initial
public offering
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Realized gain
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value at end of period
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
$
|
14.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value at end of
period
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
12.60
|
|
Total return based on market
value(2)
|
|
|
44.79
|
%
|
|
|
(13.46
|
)%
|
Total return based on net asset
value(2)
|
|
|
13.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
Shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
7,069,873
|
|
|
|
7,055,100
|
|
Ratio / Supplemental
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period (in
thousands)
|
|
$
|
108,270
|
|
|
$
|
102,967
|
|
Annualized ratio of operating
expenses to average net assets
|
|
|
8.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
Annualized ratio of net operating
income to average net assets
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial highlights as of June 30, 2006 are based on
7,069,873 shares and financial highlights from
June 30, 2005 are based on 7,055,100 shares
outstanding. |
|
(2) |
|
Total return based on market value is based on the change in
market price per share between the opening and ending market
prices per share in each period and assumes that dividends are
reinvested in accordance with Prospect Energys dividend
reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is
based upon the change in net asset value per share between the
opening and ending net asset values per share in each period and
assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with
Prospect Energys dividend reinvestment plan. The total
return is not annualized. |
The Company is a defendant in two legal actions arising out of
its activities. While predicting the outcome of litigation is
inherently very difficult, and the ultimate resolution, range of
possible loss and possible impact on operating results cannot be
reliably estimated, management believes, based upon its
understanding of the facts and the advice of legal counsel, that
it has meritorious defenses for both actions. We continue to
defend both of these actions vigorously, and believe that
resolution of these actions will not have a materially adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 6, 2004, DGP served Prospect Energy with a
complaint filed November 30, 2004 in the U.S. District
for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. DGP
alleges that DGP was defrauded and that Prospect Energy breached
its fiduciary duty to DGP and tortiously interfered with
DGPs contract to purchase Gas Solutions, Ltd. (a
subsidiary of our portfolio company, GSHI) in connection with
Prospect
F-44
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
Energys alleged agreement in September 2004 to loan DGP
funds with which DGP intended to buy Gas Solutions, Ltd. for
approximately $26 million. The complaint seeks relief not
limited to $100 million. We believe that the DGP complaint
is frivolous and without merit, and intend to defend the matter
vigorously. On November 30, 2005, U.S. Magistrate
Judge John R. Froeschner of the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, issued a
recommendation that the court grant Prospect Energys
Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims by DGP. On
February 21, 2006, U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent of
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston Division issued an order granting Prospect
Energys Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing all claims
by Dallas Gas Partners, L.P., against Prospect Energy
Corporation. DGP has appealed this decision.
On April 7, 2005 a former officer of the Company filed a
complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
of the Department of Labor (OSHA) alleging
discrimination, retaliation, infliction of emotional distress
and other claims. This officer seeks economic reinstatement and
other relief. On September 15, 2005, OSHA issued findings,
including an order dismissing this complaint. The complainant
has filed written objections to the order and had a hearing
before an Administrative Law Judge on March 16, 2006. On
May 5, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge issued a Decision
and Order granting Summary Decision and dismissing the
Complaint, which the former officer has appealed. The Company
does not believe that these claims, even if ultimately resolved
against the Company, would be material. The Company believes the
complaint is frivolous and without merit and intends to defend
itself vigorously.
We are not aware of any other material pending legal proceeding,
and no such material proceedings are known to be contemplated,
to which we are a party or of which any of our property is
subject.
|
|
Note 8.
|
Revolving
Credit Agreement
|
On February 21, 2006, Prospect Energy entered into a
$20.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the
Credit Facility) with Bank of Montreal as
administrative agent and Harris Nesbitt Corp. as sole lead
arranger and sole book runner. The Credit Facility supplements
the Companys equity capital and provides funding for
additional portfolio investments. All amounts borrowed under the
Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest
thereunder will be due and payable within six months of the date
of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of
August 21, 2006. On May 11, 2006, the Credit Facility
was increased to $30.0 million. As of June 30, 2006,
we had drawn down $28.5 million on the Credit Facility.
|
|
Note 9.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
On July 20, 2006, William J. Gremp joined Prospects
board of directors.
On July 26, 2006, we closed a $50.0 million revolving
credit facility (the Facility) with HSH Nordbank AG
as administrative agent and sole lead arranger, replacing
Prospects prior smaller $30 million facility. This
Facility is being used to refinance Prospects prior
$30.0 million credit facility and, together with our equity
capital, to make additional long-term investments. Interest on
borrowings under the Facility is charged, at our option, at
either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable spread, ranging from
200 to 250 basis points (the refinanced facility being at
250 basis points over LIBOR), or (ii) the greater of
the lender prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus
50 to 100 basis points. The applicable spread decreases as
our equity base increases. The term of the facility is one year.
On August 1, 2006, we declared a first fiscal quarter (for
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007) dividend of
$0.38 per share, payable on September 29, 2006, to
shareholders of record as of September 22, 2006. The
ex-dividend date is September 20, 2006.
On August 1, 2006, we obtained a controlling interest in
the common equity of Whymore Coal. As of September 28,
2006, we have provided an additional $0.6 million of senior
secured debt financing to Whymore Coal.
F-45
PROSPECT
ENERGY CORPORATION
Notes to Financial Statements (Continued)
On August 2, 2006, we completed the sale of all Natural Gas
Systems, Inc. (NGS) registered common shares. The
capital gain from these sales was approximately
$2.3 million.
On August 10, 2006, we priced a public offering of
4,971,000 shares of common stock at $15.30 per share,
raising $76,056,300 in gross proceeds. On August 28, 2006,
the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option related
to the public offering on August 10, 2006 to purchase
745,650 shares at $15.30 per share, raising an additional
$11,408,445 in gross proceeds. We expect to use the net proceeds
of our recent equity offering to fund investments in portfolio
companies and for general corporate purposes.
On September 5, 2006 we provided $11.0 million in
senior secured debt financing and a controlling equity interest
in NRG Manufacturing, Inc. (NRG), a leading
fabricator of structures and vessels for oil and gas drilling
applications based in Tomball, Texas.
On September 7, 2006 we provided $4.3 million in
senior secured debt financing to Cypress Consulting Services,
Inc. (Cypress), a seismic surveying company based in
Houston, Texas. We received a net profit interest in Cypress as
part of the investment.
On September 7, 2006 we provided the remaining
$3.0 million of the $9.25 million senior secured debt
investment in Iron Horse Coiled Tubing Inc. (Iron
Horse), an oilfield services company based in Medicine
Hat, Alberta. This disbursement is being utilized for Iron
Horses purchase of additional coiled tubing equipment.
On September 15, 2006, Michael E. Basham resigned from
Prospects board of directors.
On September 15, 2006, Robert A. Davidson resigned from
Prospects board of directors.
On September 21, 2006, F. Lee Liebolt, Jr. joined
Prospects board of directors.
On September 27, 2006, William E. Vastardis indicated in a
letter to Prospect Energy his intention to remain on as chief
compliance officer of Prospect Energy and Prospect Capital
Management for the foreseeable future.
|
|
Note 10.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Net Assets from Operations
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
3,110
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
5,798
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
2,981
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
5,944
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Net Assets from Operations
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(434
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
F-46
3,750,000 Shares
Common
Stock
PROSPECTUS
Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc.
Sole
Book-Running Manager
RBC
Capital Markets
Oppenheimer
& Co. Inc.
BB&T
Capital Markets
A Division of
Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
D.A.
Davidson & Co.
Janney
Montgomery Scott LLC
October , 2007