NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO.
)
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
|
[X] |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-2. |
Dover Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its
Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-12. |
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
[ ] |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
[ ] |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
Notice Of Annual Meeting Of
Stockholders
March 6, 2007
To
the stockholders:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of DOVER CORPORATION will be
held on the 3rd Floor, Room 305, Wilmington Trust
Company, 1100 North Market Street, Rodney Square North,
Wilmington, Delaware 19890, on April 17, 2007, at
10:00 A.M., local time, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
To elect eleven directors (page 2);
|
|
|
|
2.
|
To act upon a stockholder proposal regarding a sustainability
report (page 45); and
|
|
|
|
3.
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting (page 49).
|
Only holders of record of the outstanding common stock at the
close of business on February 28, 2007 are entitled to
notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
By authority of the board of directors,
Joseph
W. Schmidt
Secretary
Dover urges its stockholders to vote their shares as soon as
possible. The proxy card contains instructions on how
stockholders may cast their votes.
DOVER
CORPORATION
PROXY
STATEMENT
General
This statement is furnished by Dover Corporation
(Dover), whose principal executive offices
are at 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors for use at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
Meeting) to be held on April 17, 2007,
or any adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the
notice of meeting. Dover will pay the reasonable and actual
costs of soliciting proxies, but Dover will not pay any amount
to any officers or employees of Dover or its subsidiaries as
compensation for soliciting proxies. Dover has retained
Morrow & Co. to solicit brokerage houses and other
custodians, nominees or fiduciaries and to send proxies and
proxy material to the beneficial owners of such shares, at a fee
of $7,500 plus expenses. Dover is first sending this statement
and the proxy form to the stockholders on or about March 6,
2007.
As of the close of business on February 28, 2007, the
record date for determining stockholders eligible to vote at the
Meeting, Dover had outstanding 204,790,069 shares of common
stock. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on all
matters.
Dover has provided to each stockholder as of the record date
a copy of Dovers 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including the
financial schedules thereto but without the exhibits) as part of
Dovers Annual Report to Stockholders for 2006. Dover will
furnish any exhibit to its 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to any such stockholder upon written request and payment of a
reasonable fee as Dover may specify to cover Dovers
expenses in providing the exhibit. Requests for exhibits should
be directed to the Corporate Secretary at Dover Corporation, 280
Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
The shares covered by a proxy will be voted in accordance with
the voting instructions given by the stockholder. If a
stockholder returns a proxy but does not provide voting
instructions, the shares covered by the proxy will be voted as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for the election of the eleven nominees for director (or their
substitutes as indicated below); and
|
|
|
|
against the stockholder proposal for a sustainability report.
|
The proxy also grants discretionary authority to the persons
named as proxies in connection with other matters that may
properly come before the Meeting if and to the extent allowed by
the rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and any other applicable rules and regulations.
For purposes of the Meeting, there will be a quorum if the
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock are present
in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be
included in determining whether a quorum exists. Assuming a
quorum exists, Proposal 1, regarding the election of
directors, will require the vote of a plurality of shares
present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the
Meeting. Stockholders may not cumulate their votes.
Proposal 2 and any other matter to properly come before the
Meeting will require the affirmative vote of a majority of
shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the
Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted
for purposes of the election of directors and will have no
effect on the outcome of the vote. For Proposal 2 and any
other matter, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the
same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Delaware law permits voting by telephone and on the internet and
all votes submitted by those methods will be treated in the same
manner as if submitted by mail. Stockholders of record may vote
their shares by returning the enclosed proxy by mail, by
telephone at 1-866-540-5760 or on the
1
internet at http://www.proxyvoting.com/dov. Stockholders
who hold their shares in street name through a
broker or other nominee must follow the instructions provided by
such broker or nominee to vote their shares. A person giving a
proxy by mail, by telephone or on the internet may revoke it at
any time before it is exercised, by giving written notice to the
Corporate Secretary of Dover at the address referred to above or
by attending the Meeting and requesting in writing the
cancellation of the proxy.
1.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The persons named as proxies will vote the shares covered by a
proxy for the election of the eleven nominees listed below
unless directed otherwise in the proxy, in which case the shares
will be voted as directed. Votes may be cast only for the
nominees listed below. If any such nominee for election is not
for any reason a candidate for election at the Meeting, an event
which management does not anticipate, the proxies will be voted
for a substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by the
board of directors and for the others named below. Directors
will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. All the
nominees are presently directors. Each director elected at the
Meeting will serve until the election and qualification of his
or her successor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
Business Experience for Past Five Years,
|
|
Became
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Positions with Dover, and other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
|
David H. Benson
69
|
|
Senior Advisor, Fleming
Family & Partners (since September 2001; investment
management company); Director of Murray International Investment
Trust (investment management) and F. F. and P. Alternative
Strategies Income Fund (investment management); formerly Vice
Chairman of The Kleinwort Benson Group plc (financial services
company), Chairman of The COIF Charities Fund (investment and
cash management for charities), Director of BG Group plc (gas
exploration and production) and The Rouse Company (real estate
development).
|
|
|
1995
|
|
Robert W. Cremin
66
|
|
Chairman (since 2001), President
(since 1997) and Chief Executive Officer (since 1999), Esterline
Technologies Corporation (manufacturer of aerospace and defense
products); Director of British-American Business Council of the
Pacific Northwest; British Honorary Consul in Seattle.
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Jean-Pierre M. Ergas
67
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer (since January 2000) and Director (since 1995), BWAY
Corporation (steel and plastic container manufacturer); Director
of Plastic Omnium (manufacturer of automotive components and
plastic products).
|
|
|
1994
|
|
Kristiane C. Graham
49
|
|
Private Investor.
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
58
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (since
January 2005), President (since July 2003) and Chief Operating
Officer (from July 2003 to December 2004) of Dover; President
and Chief Executive Officer of Dover Resources, Inc. (from
January 2002 to July 2003); Executive Vice President of Dover
Resources, Inc. (from May 2000 to January 2002); President of
Tulsa Winch (through mid-2000).
|
|
|
2003
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
Business Experience for Past Five Years,
|
|
Became
|
|
Name and Age
|
|
Positions with Dover, and other Directorships
|
|
Director
|
|
|
James L. Koley
76
|
|
Director (until April 2006) and
Chairman (until February 2002) of Arts-Way Manufacturing
Co., Inc. (agricultural manufacturer); Chairman and shareholder
(until July 2002), Koley Jessen, P.C. (law firm).
|
|
|
1989
|
|
Richard K. Lochridge
63
|
|
President, Lochridge &
Company, Inc. (management consulting firm); Director of The
Lowes Company, Inc. (home improvement retailer), PETsMART
(pet supplies retailer) and John H. Harland Company (financial
marketing services).
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Thomas L. Reece
64
|
|
Chairman of the Board (since May
1999), Chief Executive Officer (until December 2004) and
President (until July 2003) of Dover.
|
|
|
1993
|
|
Bernard G. Rethore
65
|
|
Chairman of the Board Emeritus,
Flowserve Corporation (fluid transfer and control equipment and
services); previously Chairman (from July 1997 to April 2000),
Chief Executive Officer (from July 1997 to December 1999) and
President (from October 1998 to July 1999), Flowserve
Corporation; Director of Mueller Water Products, Inc. (fire
hydrants, valves and ductile iron pipes), BeldenCDT, Inc.
(specialty wires and cables) and Walter Industries, Inc.
(homebuilding, financing, carbon and natural resources).
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Michael B. Stubbs
58
|
|
Private Investor; Director of
Moore-Handley, Inc. (wholesale hardware distributor).
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Mary A. Winston
45
|
|
Executive Financial Consultant
(since January 2007), previously Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (from February 2004 to January 2007),
Scholastic Corporation (childrens publishing and media
company); Vice President (first VP-Treasurer and then
VP-Controller), Visteon Corporation (from 2002 to 2004;
automotive parts supplier); Vice President (various finance
positions), Pfizer, Inc. (from 1995 to 2002; manufacturer of
pharmaceuticals).
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Board of
Directors and Committees
During 2006, the board of directors held four regular meetings
and two special meetings. The board has three standing
committees, namely an audit committee, a compensation committee
and a governance and nominating committee. Each of the
committees has a written charter that is available on
Dovers website at
http://www.dovercorporation.com
and in print to any stockholder who requests it. Requests should
be directed to the Corporate Secretary at Dover Corporation, 280
Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. In 2006, each director attended
at least 75% of the meetings of the board of directors and the
standing committees of which he or she was a member.
The audit committee is currently composed of five
directors, all of whom satisfy all the criteria for being
independent members of the board and the audit
committee established by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange
Listing Standards (NYSE Listing Standards)
and also Dovers standards for classification as an
independent director (the Dover Independence
Standards) which are available on Dovers website
at
http://www.dovercorporation.com.
In
3
addition, the board of directors has determined that all members
of the audit committee qualify as audit committee
financial experts as defined in the applicable SEC rules.
The primary functions of the audit committee consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
selecting and engaging Dovers auditors; overseeing the
work of Dovers auditors and director of internal audit;
|
|
|
|
approving in advance all services to be provided by, and all
fees to be paid to, Dovers auditors, who report directly
to the committee;
|
|
|
|
reviewing with management and the auditors the audit plan and
results of the auditing engagement; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing with management and Dovers auditors the quality
and adequacy of Dovers internal accounting controls.
|
See the audit committee report beginning on page 43. The
audit committees responsibilities, authority and resources
are described in greater detail in its written charter. In 2006,
the audit committee held eight meetings. The members of the
audit committee are Michael B. Stubbs (Chair), David H. Benson,
James L. Koley, Bernard G. Rethore and Mary A. Winston.
The compensation committee is composed of four directors,
all of whom satisfy all the criteria for being
independent members of the board established in the
NYSE Listing Standards and the Dover Independence Standards. The
compensation committee, together with the other independent
directors, approves compensation for the chief executive
officer. The compensation committee also:
|
|
|
|
|
approves compensation for executive officers who report directly
to the CEO (together with the CEO, senior executive
officers);
|
|
|
|
grants awards and approves payouts under Dovers equity and
cash performance incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
approves changes to the compensation plans; and
|
|
|
|
supervises the administration of the compensation plans.
|
See the compensation committee report on page 21. The
compensation committees responsibilities, authority and
resources are described in greater detail in its written
charter. In 2006, the compensation committee held four meetings.
The members of the compensation committee are Richard K.
Lochridge (Chair), Robert W. Cremin, Jean-Pierre M. Ergas, and
Kristiane C. Graham.
The governance and nominating committee is composed of
four directors, all of whom satisfy all the criteria for being
independent members of the board established in the
NYSE Listing Standards and the Dover Independence Standards. The
governance and nominating committee develops and recommends to
the board corporate governance principles for Dover. In
addition, the governance and nominating committee identifies and
recommends to the board candidates for election as directors and
any changes it believes desirable in the size and composition of
the board, and also makes recommendations to the board
concerning the structure and membership of the boards
committees. The governance and nominating committees
responsibilities, authority and resources are described in
greater detail in its written charter. The governance and
nominating committee held four meetings in 2006. The members of
the governance and nominating committee are James L. Koley
(Chair), David H. Benson, Robert W. Cremin and Kristiane C.
Graham.
Dover does not require directors to attend the annual meeting of
stockholders. Directors generally do not, and in 2006 did not,
attend the annual meeting.
4
Corporate
Governance
Dover is committed to conducting its business in accordance with
the highest level of ethical and corporate governance standards.
The following describes some of the actions taken to help ensure
that the conduct of Dover and its employees earns the respect
and trust of stockholders, customers, business partners,
employees and the communities in which they live and work.
The board of directors has adopted written corporate governance
guidelines which set forth the responsibilities of the board and
guidelines relating to the qualifications and independence of
its members and the members of its standing committees. In
addition, the board has adopted a code of business conduct and
ethics setting forth standards applicable to all Dover companies
and their employees, a code of ethics for the chief executive
officer and senior financial officers, and charters for each of
its standing committees. All of these documents (referred to
collectively as governance materials) are available on
Dovers website at http://www.dovercorporation.com,
and in print to any stockholder who requests them. Requests
should be directed to the Corporate Secretary at Dover
Corporation, 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. The board, its
committees and management periodically review the requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbox
Act), the rules of the SEC, the NYSEs Listing
Standards and governance best practices, and revise the
governance materials as warranted in light of corporate
governance developments. Each of Dovers segment
subsidiaries and operating companies has a written code of
conduct that meets or exceeds the standards of Dovers code
of business conduct and ethics.
The board has determined that at least two-thirds of its members
and all of the members of its audit, compensation and governance
and nominating committees shall be independent from management
and shall meet all of the applicable criteria for independence
established by the NYSE, the SEC and Dover. Currently, nine of
eleven Dover directors meet all of these standards for
independence. The board makes an annual determination of the
independence of each nominee for director prior to his or her
nomination for (re)election. No director may be deemed
independent unless the board determines that he or she has no
material relationship with Dover, directly or as an officer,
stockholder or partner of an organization that has a material
relationship with Dover.
The board has determined that each of the current members of the
board, except for Thomas L. Reece, who was formerly a management
representative, and Ronald L. Hoffman, who is the current
management representative on the board, has no relationship with
Dover and meets the independence requirements in the NYSE
Listing Standards and the independence requirements of the SEC.
In addition, all members of the board, except for
Messrs. Reece and Hoffman, meet the Dover standards for
director independence, which are set forth below.
The board holds four regular meetings a year, on a quarterly
basis, and additional meetings as it deems necessary. In
accordance with the NYSE Listing Standards, its non-management
members meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without
management representatives and its independent directors meet
alone at least annually. Mr. Koley, the chair of the
governance and nominating committee, presides at these sessions.
In addition to their normal board meeting attendance, many
non-management directors periodically attend the board and
company presidents meetings of the segment subsidiaries.
At least one non-management director serves on the board of each
of the six segment subsidiaries, and at least one non-management
director usually attends the segment subsidiaries regular
board and company presidents meetings. The board and its
committees conduct annual self-evaluations of their performance.
At each of its regular quarterly meetings, the audit committee
meets with each of the auditors, the director of internal audit
and management separately to assess the effectiveness of the
independent audit process. In addition to its regular quarterly
meetings, the audit committee as a whole reviews and meets to
discuss each Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(including financials) prior to its filing with the SEC. The
audit committee chair or
his/her
designee participates in meetings with management and
Dovers auditors to review earnings releases prior to the
release of such information. At least one such meeting is held
each quarter by
5
managements disclosure controls and procedures committee,
which includes among its members the chief financial officer,
the controller, the director of internal audit and the general
counsel of Dover, as well as the chief financial officers of
Dovers segment subsidiaries (the DC&P
committee). The meeting takes place immediately before
Dovers release of earnings and the filing of its Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
or its Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as the case may be, and is for the purpose of reviewing the
earnings release, the contents of the quarterly or annual
report, as the case may be, and Dovers disclosure controls
and procedures. The meeting is attended by the chair of the
audit committee or
his/her
designee from the audit committee and Dovers auditors, who
review Dovers earnings releases and reports before the
meeting and discuss them with management at the meeting.
In accordance with the Sarbox Act, the audit committee has
established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and
treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls, or auditing matters (accounting
matters), and (ii) the confidential, anonymous
submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable
accounting matters. Such complaints or concerns may be submitted
to Dover, care of the Corporate Secretary, or through the
communications coordinator, an external service provider (the
communications coordinator), by mail, fax, telephone
or via the internet as published on Dovers website at
http://www.dovercorporation.com. The communications
coordinator will forward such communications to the chair of the
audit committee and, in most circumstances, to Dovers
General Counsel, in each case without disclosing the identity of
the sender if anonymity is requested. Stockholders and other
interested persons may also communicate with the board and the
non-management directors in any of these same manners. Such
communications will be forwarded to the chair of the governance
and nominating committee and Dovers General Counsel.
Dover
Independence Standards
In order for a Dover director to qualify as independent for
purposes of the NYSE Listing Standards, the Dover board must
affirmatively determine that the director has no material
relationship with Dover and its subsidiaries (either directly or
as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has
a material relationship with Dover or its subsidiaries). The
board has determined that individuals who satisfy the following
standards shall be deemed independent per se for purposes of
board membership, although additional eligibility standards may
exist with respect to a specific board committee. The board may
amend these standards from time to time in its discretion or for
consistency with then applicable NYSE standards. In the
following list, the term Dover means Dover and its
consolidated subsidiaries. Current means being an
executive, employee or partner at the time of determination of
independence. Executive officer of Dover means
Dovers chief executive officer and those executive
officers who report directly to him.
1. The director is not and has not been, within the prior
three years, an employee of Dover (excluding service as an
interim chairman, CEO or executive officer of Dover).
2. No member of the directors immediate family
is or has been, within the prior three years, an executive
officer of Dover (excluding service as an interim chairman, CEO
or executive officer of Dover).
3. The director has not received, during any
twelve-month period within the prior three years, more than
$100,000 in direct compensation from Dover (other than director
or committee fees, pension and other deferred compensation for
prior services not contingent on continued service).
4. No member of the directors immediate family
has received, during any twelve-month period within the prior
three years, more than $100,000 in direct compensation from
Dover (other than compensation received for services as a
non-executive employee of Dover or pension or other deferred
compensation for prior services not contingent on continued
service).
6
5. The director is not a current partner or a current
employee of Dovers external auditor (or, if Dover has
engaged a third party to provide internal auditing services,
such internal auditor) and was not within the last three years a
partner or employee of Dovers external auditor (or, if
Dover has engaged a third party to provide internal auditing
services, such internal auditor) who personally worked on
Dovers audit and, in the case that Dover has changed its
independent auditors within the prior three years, such former
auditors.
6. No member of the directors immediate family
is a current partner of Dovers external auditor (or, if
Dover has engaged a third party to provide internal auditing
services, such internal auditor) or a current employee of
Dovers external auditor (or, if Dover has engaged a third
party to provide internal auditing services, such internal
auditor) who participates in such auditors audit,
assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice, or
was within the last three years a partner or employee of
Dovers external auditor (or, if Dover has engaged a third
party to provide internal auditing services, such internal
auditor) who personally worked on Dovers audit and, in the
case that Dover has changed its independent auditors within the
prior three years, such former auditors.
7. Neither the director nor any member of the
directors immediate family is, or has been within the last
three years, employed as an executive officer of a company
during the same period that any of Dovers current
executive officers serves or served on the compensation
committee of that company.
8. The director is not a current employee of a
company that has made payments to, or received payments from,
Dover for property or services in an amount which, in any of the
three most recent fiscal years, exceeds the greater of
$1 million or 2% of such other companys consolidated
gross revenues.
9. No member of the directors immediate family
is a current executive officer of a company that has made
payments to, or received payments from, Dover for property or
services in an amount that, in any of the three most recent
fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of
such other companys consolidated gross revenues.
10. The director does not serve as an executive
officer in any tax exempt organization to which Dover has made
contributions in any single fiscal year within the last three
years in an amount that exceeds the greater of $1 million
or 2% of such tax exempt organizations consolidated gross
revenues.
Qualifications
and Nominations of Directors
The governance and nominating committee considers and recommends
to the board of directors nominees for election to, or for
filling any vacancy on, the board in accordance with
Dovers
by-laws and
the committees charter. The committee annually reviews the
requisite skills and characteristics of board members as well as
the size, composition, functioning and needs of the board as a
whole. To be considered for board membership, a nominee for
director must be an individual who has the highest personal and
professional integrity, who has demonstrated exceptional ability
and judgment, and who will be most effective, in conjunction
with the other nominees to the board, in collectively serving
the long-term interests of Dovers stockholders. The
committee also considers members qualifications as
independent (the board requires that at least two-thirds of its
members be independent in accordance with applicable NYSE and
SEC criteria), the financial literacy of members of the audit
committee, the qualification of at least one member of the audit
committee as an audit committee financial expert,
and the diversity, skills, background and experiences of board
members in the context of the needs of the board.
The governance and nominating committee may also consider such
other factors as it may deem to be in the best interests of
Dover and its stockholders. The board believes it appropriate
and
7
important that at least one key member of Dovers
management participate as a member of the board. In appropriate
circumstances, this number may be increased to two.
Whenever the committee concludes, based on the reviews or
considerations described above or due to a vacancy, that a new
nominee to the board is required or advisable, it will consider
recommendations from directors, management, stockholders and, if
it deems appropriate, consultants retained for that purpose. In
such circumstances, it will evaluate individuals recommended by
stockholders in the same manner as nominees recommended from
other sources. Stockholders who wish to recommend an individual
for nomination should send that persons name and
supporting information to the committee, care of the Corporate
Secretary, or through Dovers communications coordinator.
Stockholders who wish to directly nominate an individual for
election as a director, without going through the governance and
nominating committee or using Dovers proxy material, must
comply with the procedures in Dovers by-laws.
All of the nominees for director for election at the Meeting
currently serve on the board and are being proposed by the board.
Compensation
Committee Procedures
Under its charter, the compensation committee is required to
meet at least annually. In practice the compensation committee
has been meeting on a quarterly basis to review regulatory
developments that may impact Dovers compensation
arrangements and employee benefit plans, consider amendments to
compensation and benefit plans and perform various
administrative tasks of the committee, including its annual
review. At the committees regular meeting in February of
each year, the committee reviews the results of the prior year
and determines whether the relevant performance criteria
required for the payment to senior executive officers of annual
bonuses and medium-term cash incentive compensation for the
prior year have been satisfied and, if so, considers and
approves the actual amounts of any such payouts. At that
meeting, the committee determines the participants in the
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan and establishes
performance criteria for annual bonuses to be awarded under such
plan for the coming year, considers and approves any changes in
base salary of senior executive officers and determines and
makes medium-term cash performance and long-term equity awards
under the 2005 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (the 2005
plan). The 2005 plan allows Dover to award stock option
and SSAR grants, and restricted stock and cash incentive awards.
In making its executive compensation decisions, the committee
utilizes tally sheets prepared by outside consultants, detailing
all compensation payable to each senior executive officer,
including potential post-termination benefits.
Awards under the 2005 plan are typically made at the scheduled
February compensation committee meeting each year shortly after
the announcement of the earnings for the prior year. Except in
very limited circumstances, the committee does not grant equity
awards to executive officers at other times during a given year.
Even in such cases, the grants are made by the compensation
committee at regularly scheduled quarterly meetings with an
exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of grant.
Mid-year hires who will participate in the long-term incentive
plan usually receive their first grant the following February.
All equity awards are made at fair market value on the date of
grant, which is the date on which the compensation committee
approves the grant. Under the 2005 plan, fair market value is
determined in good faith by the compensation committee, taking
into consideration the factors the committee deems appropriate
from time to time, typically the closing price on the date of
grant and the average of the high and low market prices on the
date of grant. In November 2006, in light of the new SEC
regulations relating to executive compensation disclosure, the
committee adopted a principle that, going-forward, no grant will
be made with an exercise price below the closing market price on
the date of grant. The committee has delegated to its chair the
authority to make the final determination of the exercise price
following the close of business on the date of grant.
8
The compensation committee annually reviews the performance of
Dovers chief executive officer and recommends his
compensation for review and revision or approval by Dovers
independent directors acting as a group. The compensation of the
executive officers who report directly to Dovers chief
executive officer is recommended by Dovers chief executive
officer to the committee, which reviews and revises or approves
the recommendation as the committee deems appropriate.
The compensation committee has the authority and discretion to
retain external compensation consultants as it deems
appropriate. Until recently, Dovers compensation committee
and management were advised by Jude Rich of Rich Associates and
Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC. Following
Mr. Richs retirement, the compensation committee
selected and retained Mercer Human Resource Consulting, Inc. to
serve as its compensation consultant. The compensation committee
generally does not ask its consultants to develop
recommendations for the compensation of individual executive
officers. Rather, the compensation committee looks to its
consultant to periodically review and advise regarding the
adequacy and appropriateness of Dovers overall executive
compensation plans, programs and practices and, from time to
time, to answer specific questions raised by the committee or
management. Compensation decisions are made by, and are the
responsibility of, the compensation committee and the board, and
may reflect factors and considerations other than the
information and recommendations provided by the committees
consultants. Dovers compensation consultants perform
substantially no other services for Dover.
Procedures
for Approval of Related Person Transactions
Dover does not generally engage in transactions in which its
senior executive officers or directors, any of their immediate
family members or any of its 5% stockholders have a material
interest. Should a proposed transaction involve any such
persons, the transaction is referred to Dovers board of
directors for consideration and approval by the disinterested
directors. Dovers code of business conduct and ethics,
which sets forth standards applicable to all employees, officers
and directors of any Dover company, generally proscribes
transactions that could result in a conflict of interest for
Dover. Any waiver of the code for any senior executive officer
or director requires the approval of Dovers board of
directors. Any such waiver will be disclosed on Dovers
website or on a
Form 8-K.
No such waivers were granted in 2006.
Directors
Compensation
Under Dovers 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Compensation Plan (the directors plan),
non-employee directors receive annual compensation in an amount
the board sets from time to time. The directors annual
compensation is payable partly in cash and partly in common
stock in an allocation the board may adjust from time to time.
The cash portion is paid in equal quarterly payments. The stock
portion is paid as of November 15 of each year. If any director
serves for less than a full calendar year, the compensation to
be paid to that director for the year will be pro-rated as
deemed appropriate by the compensation committee.
Annual compensation for 2006 under the directors plan was
$120,000, payable 40% in cash and 60% in common stock, and was
paid by $48,000 in cash and 1,428 shares of common stock.
The number of shares granted to any director is determined by
dividing the dollar amount of the directors annual
compensation to be paid in shares by the fair market
value of a share on the date of grant. The board has
selected November 15 of each year as the date for stock
compensation to directors. Fair market value is
determined in good faith by the compensation committee on the
basis of considerations the committee deems appropriate,
including, for example, the closing price on the date of grant
and the average of the high and low sales prices on the date of
grant.
At its November 2006 meeting, the board of directors increased
the base annual compensation of non-employee directors from
$120,000 to $140,000, effective January 1, 2007. The
percentage of the annual compensation payable in stock and cash
remains 60% and 40%, respectively. The board
9
of directors also approved an increase in the additional annual
cash retainer for the chair of the audit committee from $10,000
to $15,000 and the payment of an additional annual cash retainer
of $7,500 to the chair of each of the compensation committee and
the governance and nominating committee. The additional annual
retainer for the chairman of the board remains at $80,000,
payable 60% in stock and 40% in cash. In addition, effective for
calendar year 2007, Dover directors will receive an annual cash
retainer of $15,000 if they serve on a segment subsidiary board
plus an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000 if they serve
on the board of a second segment subsidiary. No meeting fees
will be paid to directors for attending subsidiary meetings.
The board also amended Dovers corporate governance
guidelines to reflect the boards new policy, effective
January 1, 2007, that directors are expected to hold at any
time at least the aggregate number of shares they were entitled
to receive as the stock portion of their annual retainer during
the previous five years, net of an assumed 30% withholding tax.
The table below sets forth the compensation Dover paid to its
directors for services in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in cash($)
|
|
|
($) (1)
|
|
|
Awards($)
|
|
|
Compensation($)
|
|
|
Earnings($)
|
|
|
($) (2)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
|
David H. Benson
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
123,000
|
|
Robert W. Cremin
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
Jean-Pierre M. Ergas
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
Kristiane C. Graham
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
James L. Koley
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
136,500
|
|
Richard K. Lochridge
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
Thomas L. Reece(3)
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Bernard G. Rethore
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
Michael B. Stubbs(4)
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
Mary A. Winston
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts represent the value on
November 15, 2006 of the stock awards granted to
non-management directors for the year 2006 under the
directors plan. Mr. Ronald L. Hoffman is a management
director and does not receive any additional compensation for
his service as a director. For a discussion of
Mr. Hoffmans compensation for his services as
President and Chief Executive Officer, see Executive
Compensation Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts in the column
All Other Compensation reflect meeting fees for
attending segment subsidiary board meetings. To facilitate the
knowledge on Dovers board of the operations of its six
business segments, Dover invites non-employee directors to serve
on the board of directors of one or two of its six segment
subsidiaries. Non-employee directors are also invited to attend
segment subsidiary regular board and company presidents
meetings. During 2006, each of directors Benson, Ergas, Graham,
Koley, Rethore and Stubbs served as a director of at least one
segment subsidiary. Each Dover director received a fee of $1,500
for each subsidiary meeting attended.
|
|
(3)
|
|
In addition to the regular annual
director compensation of $120,000, Mr. Reece received
$80,000 for his services as chairman of the board of directors,
paid 60% in stock and 40% in cash. Mr. Reece retired as an
officer of Dover in 2004. During 2006, Mr. Reece was
reimbursed for a trip given to him by the board of directors in
2005 as a retirement gift for his 38 years of service to
Dover, the last 10 as President and Chief Executive Officer. The
value of this trip was $40,684 (including tax
gross-up).
Pursuant to his retirement arrangements, during 2006
Mr. Reece received reimbursement of COBRA medical payments
(including tax
gross-up) in
the amount of $30,683 and a payout under the SERP in the amount
of $802,749. In February 2007, Mr. Reece received a payment
of $1,626,330, representing payout of a cash performance award
granted to Mr. Reece in February 2004 in his capacity at
that time as Dovers Chief Executive Officer.
|
10
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
In addition to the regular annual
director compensation of $120,000, Mr. Stubbs received
$10,000 for his services as chairman of the audit committee.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership, as of February 28, 2007 (except as
otherwise stated), of Dover common stock by:
|
|
|
|
|
each of the senior executive officers listed in the Summary
Compensation Table;
|
|
|
|
each of Dovers directors and nominees for director;
|
|
|
|
all of the directors, nominees and senior executive officers as
a group; and
|
|
|
|
each person known to Dover to own beneficially more than 5% of
its outstanding common stock.
|
The beneficial ownership of Dover common stock set forth in the
table is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. The
calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership is based
on 204,790,069 shares of common stock outstanding on
February 28, 2007. In computing the number of shares
beneficially owned by any stockholder and the percentage
ownership of such stockholder, shares of common stock subject to
options held by that person that are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of the record date are deemed to
have been exercised and to be outstanding. Such shares, however,
are not deemed to have been issued and to be outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person. Share amounts held in the Dover Corporation Retirement
Savings Plan (the 401(k) plan) are reported as of
February 26, 2007.
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, the persons
and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment
power as to all shares beneficially owned. Unless otherwise
indicated, the business address for all directors and senior
executive officers is c/o Dover Corporation, 280 Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10017.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
David H. Benson
|
|
|
21,986
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert W. Cremin
|
|
|
4,228
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jean-Pierre M. Ergas
|
|
|
28,718
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kristiane C. Graham
|
|
|
979,998
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
249,151
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
James L. Koley
|
|
|
23,418
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
329,910
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard K. Lochridge
|
|
|
13,868
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas L. Reece
|
|
|
1,422,799
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bernard G. Rethore
|
|
|
8,561
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
111,417
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
138,904
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael B. Stubbs
|
|
|
117,908
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
95,764
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mary A. Winston
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Directors and senior executive
officers as a group
|
|
|
4,357,368
|
(13)
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
GE Asset Management Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3001 Summer Street
Stamford, Connecticut 06904
|
|
|
13,258,720
|
(14)
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than one percent.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes 1,000 shares held by
Mr. Bensons spouse as to which Mr. Benson
disclaims any beneficial ownership.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 493,325 shares held
by foundations of which Ms. Graham is a director and in
which she disclaims any beneficial ownership, 89,578 shares
held in various trusts of which she is a co-trustee sharing
voting and investment powers and in which she disclaims any
beneficial ownership and 2,460 shares held by her minor
children.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 11,586 shares held
by a revocable trust of which Mr. Hoffman is the sole
trustee, 235,708 shares in respect of options that have
been granted to Mr. Hoffman and that are exercisable within
60 days of the record date and 1,857 shares owned by
Mr. Hoffman in Dovers 401(k) plan.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 8,000 shares that
are subject to a margin account.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 3,000 shares held by
Mr. Kuhbachs spouse, 267,511 shares in respect
of options that have been granted to Mr. Kuhbach and that
are exercisable within 60 days of the record date and
6,231 shares owned by Mr. Kuhbach in Dovers
401(k) plan.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Represents shares held by a trust
of which Mr. Lochridge is the trustee.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 10,000 shares held
by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Reece is the
chairman and in which he disclaims any beneficial ownership and
1,227,712 shares in respect of options that have been
granted to Mr. Reece and that are exercisable within
60 days of the record date and 35,087 shares owned by
Mr. Reece in Dovers 401(k) plan.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Represents shares held by a trust
of which Mr. Rethore is the trustee.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 2,500 shares held
jointly with Mr. Ropps spouse which shares are
subject to a margin account, 107,424 shares in respect of
options that have been granted to Mr. Ropp and that are
exercisable within 60 days of the record date and
1,493 shares owned by Mr. Ropp in Dovers 401(k)
plan.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 89,834 shares in
respect of options that have been granted to Mr. Sandker
and are exercisable within 60 days of the record date and
10,131 shares owned by Mr. Sandker in Dovers
401(k) plan.
|
12
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 500 shares held by
his spouse as to which Mr. Stubbs disclaims beneficial
ownership, 69,972 shares held by a trust of which
Mr. Stubbs is a co-trustee and various members of his
immediate family are beneficiaries and 18,249 shares held
in a grantor-retained annuity trust. Excludes
2,321,978 shares held by trusts of which Mr. Stubbs is
a beneficiary.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes 6,264 shares held in
a trust of which Mr. Van Loan and his wife are co-trustees,
89,350 shares in respect of options that have been granted
to Mr. Van Loan and that are exercisable within
60 days of the record date and 150 shares owned by
Mr. Van Loan in Dovers 401(k) plan.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Includes 91,227 shares that
are owned by officers in Dovers 401(k) plan and
2,671,369 shares in respect of options that have been
granted to directors and executive officers and that are
exercisable within 60 days of the record date.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Based solely on information
provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 2007.
Includes 4,370,604 shares owned by Trustees of General
Electric Pension Trust for whom GE Asset Management
Incorporation (GEAM) acts as investment manager.
Also includes 8,888,116 shares owned by certain other
entities and accounts for which GEAM is investment advisor. GEAM
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the General Electric Company,
which disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares reported.
|
Section 16
(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that
Dovers directors and certain of its officers file reports
of ownership and changes of ownership of Dovers common
stock with the SEC and the NYSE. Based solely on copies of such
reports provided to Dover, Dover believes that all directors and
officers filed on a timely basis all such reports required of
them with respect to stock ownership and changes in ownership
during 2006.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Executive
Compensation Policy and Objectives
The primary objectives of Dovers executive compensation
programs are to attract and retain highly qualified executive
officers, to motivate them to achieve measurable performance
objectives at their management level and to align their
interests with those of Dovers stockholders.
To achieve the above objectives, Dover follows the basic
principles that annual compensation should be competitive with
other public manufacturing companies of similar size and that
long-term compensation should generally be linked to
Dovers total return to stockholders. Consistent with
Dovers highly decentralized management approach, Dover
also believes that compensation for an executive should be
closely aligned to the performance of the business over which
the executive has the most control. In Dovers
decentralized management structure, there are three levels or
groups of management: corporate, segment subsidiary and
operating company. In significant ways, Dovers
compensation plans and programs described in the following pages
reflect these different management levels.
Dover believes that employment contracts are usually not in the
best interests of the company or its stockholders. None of
Dovers executive officers has an employment contract.
Dover does not believe in negotiating special compensation
arrangements with individual executive officers and seldom does
so. Dovers executive compensation plans and programs apply
in substantially the same manner to all of Dovers current
executive officers with only the variations described in the
following pages. These variations relate primarily to level of
responsibility, duration of employment, retirement eligibility
and similar factors.
The following discussion outlines the process for evaluating and
rewarding Dovers executive officers, numbering about 60,
consisting of operating company presidents and the small group
of
13
executive officers located at segment subsidiary offices or
Dover corporate headquarters. The plans and programs mentioned
in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis are described in
detail in the following pages. Dovers chief executive
officer and those executive officers who report directly to him
constitute Dovers executive officers as defined under SEC
rules and are termed senior executive officers in
this proxy statement.
Compensation for each executive officer is normally reviewed
annually in January. Dover employs a
one-over-one
compensation review system in which an employees
compensation is reviewed by the two management levels above that
employee. In this system, the employees performance is
reviewed by the employees supervisor, who recommends any
compensation adjustment to the person to whom the supervisor
reports. The second level supervisor reviews and revises or
approves the recommendation. The compensation of an operating
company president or the chief financial officer of a segment
subsidiary is recommended by the chief executive officer of that
companys segment subsidiary and reviewed and revised or
approved by Dovers chief executive officer. The
compensation of the executive officers who report directly to
Dovers chief executive officer is recommended by
Dovers chief executive officer and reviewed and revised or
approved by the compensation committee of Dovers board of
directors. This includes the four other senior executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Dovers chief executive officer and the compensation
committee are provided with compensation data on all executive
officers. The compensation committee reviews the performance of
Dovers chief executive officer and recommends his
compensation. This recommendation is reviewed and revised or
approved by all of Dovers independent directors acting as
a group (which includes all the members of the compensation
committee, all of whom are independent).
In establishing compensation for Dovers executive
officers, the total compensation earned or potentially available
for each such person is considered. As part of this process, the
compensation committee has for several years reviewed
tally sheets prepared by consultants. These
tally sheets are prepared separately for
Dovers chief executive officer and each executive officer
reporting directly to the chief executive officer, including all
senior executive officers named in the Summary Compensation
Table. The tally sheets include all elements of compensation,
including annual base salary, annual bonus, medium-term cash
performance awards and payouts, long-term equity incentive
grants, perquisites and retirement and termination benefits.
Dover executive officers do not have employment contracts, and
Dover does not have a general severance policy. Accordingly, no
Dover executive officer has a contractual right to severance or
other benefits upon termination of employment except for
benefits to be provided in accordance with the terms of
compensation plans in connection with previously granted equity
and cash performance awards, accrued retirement benefits and
double-trigger change in control agreements which are described
below.
Dover believes that, in addition to annual salary and bonus
opportunities, incentives should be provided to key management
over longer periods of time, both to encourage focus on
Dovers long-term performance and help retain talented
executives. Dover offers its executive officers this incentive
compensation under its long-term incentive plan (LTIP) in two
forms. The first form is cash performance awards, which are
paid, if earned, three years after award, depending on the
financial performance of the executive officers applicable
business unit over the three-year period. Dover considers this
medium-term incentive compensation. The second form is equity
awards which, since 2006, are stock settled stock appreciation
rights (SSARs) and, prior to 2006, were stock options. SSARs
(and stock options) are not exercisable during the first three
years after grant, and then are exercisable for seven years, for
a total term of 10 years. Dover considers this long-term
incentive compensation. SSARs and stock options will have value
only if and to the extent that Dovers stock price has
increased above its price on the date of grant.
Dover sets compensation on the basis of the performance of the
business over which the executive has the most control. For an
executive officer at an operating company, the executive
14
officers compensation relates to a large extent directly
to the performance of that company. For an executive officer at
the segment subsidiary level, compensation is closely related to
the performance of that business segment. For executive officers
at the corporate level, the overall performance of Dover, as
reported to stockholders, is given primary consideration.
In setting compensation, Dover generally compares its executive
compensation to the manufacturing companies in the Total
Compensation Management database, a proprietary database
designed by Hewitt Associates (the TCM database).
Since Dover operates in multiple business segments in the
manufacturing industry, management and the compensation
committee believe it most appropriate to use a broad
manufacturing index for comparative compensation purposes. The
TCM database currently includes approximately 270 public
manufacturing companies, including Dover and most of the
companies that comprise Dovers peer group for purposes of
its stock performance graph, which appears in Dovers
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The TCM database facilitates comparison of compensation of
executive officers in stated positions at business units of
specified sizes at public manufacturing companies which report
their compensation data into the database. Dover has recognized
that, under Dovers highly decentralized management
structure, the executive officers of its operating companies are
given a much broader level of independent responsibility for
their businesses and less centralized administrative support
than that generally accorded business unit managers in
comparable but centralized companies. This includes
responsibility for the operation and performance of their
businesses, including development, sourcing and marketing of
products, management of capital allocated to them, and
initiating and implementing any add-on acquisition proposals for
their operating company. Accordingly, Dover decided that the
compensation levels of the executive officers at its operating
companies should be targeted 15% above the compensation levels
of executive officers in comparable positions at similar-sized
business units of the other manufacturing companies in the TCM
database.
A similar analysis was performed for executive officers at the
segment subsidiary level. In Dovers decentralized
management structure, the executive officers at the segment
subsidiary level bear responsibilities much broader than their
counterparts at similar-sized operating business units at most
other manufacturing companies. Dover believes these
responsibilities approach, but are still less than, the
responsibilities of executive officers at the top level of
public manufacturing companies in the TCM database. Accordingly,
Dover decided that the compensation levels of the executive
officers at its segment subsidiaries should be targeted 15%
below the compensation levels of executive officers in the top
positions of the other manufacturing companies in the TCM
database similar in size to the Dover executive officers
segment subsidiary.
Dover uses the 62nd percentile of the TCM database as the
appropriate benchmark for salaries and bonuses for all its
executives, adjusted as described above. Dover believes that
doing so has enabled it and its companies to attract and retain
above-average executive talent and is intent on continuing to do
so as this drives the financial performance of the company.
Dover generally promotes executives from within. However, when
Dover or its companies have gone outside to recruit, the success
of those efforts has indicated that the levels of its executive
compensation are generally appropriate for Dover and its
objectives. This TCM database percentile (adjusted as described
above) is only a benchmark and the compensation of executive
officers in particular cases may be above or below the adjusted
benchmark.
Compensation
Components
For 2006, an executives compensation consisted of a base
salary, an annual incentive bonus opportunity (generally a
percentage of the annual salary), medium-term cash-based and
long-term equity-based compensation, as well as retirement and
other customary benefits such as health care, group life
insurance and long-term disability. Dover does not provide
post-retirement health care benefits to its executive officers.
15
Annual
Compensation
Base Salary: Dover executive officers
salaries vary from the targeted 62nd percentile of the TCM
database based on the assigned responsibilities, individual
performance, business unit performance and the individuals
skills, experience and background. Base salaries are reviewed
annually and adjusted as appropriate to realign them with market
levels after taking into account the factors indicated above.
Annual Bonus: Dover has a traditional bonus
program under which it awards its executive officers annual cash
bonuses (generally targeted at a percentage of salary) on a
discretionary basis. Bonus levels are set with reference to the
62nd percentile of the TCM database and are based on a
pay-for-performance
policy. Annual bonuses vary depending upon the performance of
the executive officers business unit, as measured by
earnings growth, return on investment and achievement of
specific performance goals set by the officers supervisor,
as well as managements judgment of the officers
overall performance. For 2006, it was expected that
approximately 50% of any bonus earned at the operating company
level would reflect efforts to meet or exceed Dover operating
company performance metrics (inventory turnover, net earnings
growth, operating margin, working capital as a percentage of
sales and after-tax return on investment) and advance
appropriate succession plans.
Dover has an Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan (the
bonus incentive plan) under which Dover may award to
its most senior executive officers cash incentive bonuses based
on financial performance relative to pre-established annual
performance goals. The bonus incentive plan, which replaces the
traditional bonus program for participating executive officers,
is designed to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code so that annual bonus awards given
to participants will be tax deductible by Dover.
The bonus incentive plan is administered by the compensation
committee and operates in the following manner. The compensation
committee determines which senior executive officers will
participate in the bonus incentive plan in any given year. At
its meeting in February each year, the compensation committee
establishes the performance criteria by which each participant
will be measured for that year, the numerical performance goal
for each such criterion, and a target dollar bonus amount for
each participant. For participants at the corporate level, the
criteria may be any or all of Dovers net income, earnings
per share and return on equity, as reflected in Dovers
public financial statements. For participants at the segment
subsidiary level, the criteria may be either or both of that
subsidiarys operating earnings and return on investment.
The compensation committee sets the numerical performance goals
at levels it believes provide a reasonable bonus opportunity
with an incentive for substantial upside for achievement of
greater than 100% of the goals. The compensation committee has
decided that no credit will be given for performance less than
50% of the performance goal, and that no additional credit will
be given for performance above 150% of the performance goal.
After the end of the year, the level of performance is
determined and the potential bonus for each participant is
calculated. The compensation committee then considers all other
factors in the annual performance of each participant.
Considering these factors, the committee has discretion to set
the amount of a participants annual bonus which may not be
more than that calculated under the bonus incentive plan. As a
point of reference in exercising this discretion, annual bonus
amounts arrived at under this plan are typically compared to
comparable bonus levels reflected in the TCM database, using as
a target the 62nd percentile. The bonuses paid under the
bonus incentive plan are almost always less than the maximum
possible bonus calculated in accordance with the plan. It is
Dovers intention that the amount of bonus paid to any
participant under the bonus incentive plan for any year will
approximate the amount of bonus that would be paid to that
participant under the companys traditional bonus program.
16
For 2006, all of the executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table plus the other segment subsidiary heads
participated in the bonus incentive plan. The performance
criterion was earnings per share for each participating
corporate officer and segment operating earnings for the heads
of each business segment. At the corporate level, 91% of the
performance goal was achieved. At the segment subsidiaries, the
level of performance goal achievement ranged from 82% to 105%.
After discretionary adjustment by the compensation committee,
the named executive officers were paid the bonuses shown in the
Summary Compensation Table.
Medium-Term
and Long-Term Compensation
As mentioned above, Dover offers its executive officers
incentive compensation over periods of time longer than one year
under its long-term incentive plan (LTIP). This is Dovers
2005 plan. Only executives who are in a position to affect
materially Dovers profitability and growth are eligible
for awards under the 2005 plan.
The 2005 plan allows Dover to make cash performance awards,
stock option grants, restricted stock awards and, beginning in
2006, SSAR grants. Dover generally does not award restricted
stock except in connection with special or unusual
circumstances. No restricted stock awards were made to executive
officers in or for the year 2006 and none of Dovers
executive officers currently holds restricted stock. Stock
options and SSARs have substantially the same terms and provide
the same incentive and benefit to employees, but SSARs were
added to the 2005 plan in 2006 as a replacement for stock
options because SSARs are much easier for the company and the
employee to administer. SSARs also should result in fewer shares
being issued and thus less dilution. Prior to 2006, no SSARs
were available. Since the 2005 plan was amended to make SSARs
available, no options have been granted.
Awards under the 2005 plan are generally made only once each
year, at the scheduled February compensation committee meeting
shortly after announcement of earnings for the prior year.
Except in very limited circumstances, the committee does not
grant LTIP awards at other times during a given year. Even in
such cases, the grants are made by the compensation committee at
regularly scheduled quarterly meetings and equity grants have an
exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of grant.
Mid-year hires who will participate in the long term incentive
plan usually receive their first grant the following February.
LTIP awards are generally a combination of an SSAR grant and a
cash performance award. The award for an individual is
calculated by multiplying the individuals base salary by a
multiple appropriate for his or her level established by the
compensation committee and designed to deliver competitive
62nd percentile medium and long-term incentive
compensation. The resulting dollar value is then allocated
between SSAR grant and cash incentive award, as described in the
following paragraph. For the named executive officers, the cash
incentive awards and SSAR grants made in February 2007 were
based on multiples ranging from 3.8 to 7.2, with higher
multiples relating to higher levels of responsibility.
In keeping with Dovers executive compensation philosophy,
Dover adjusts the relative mix of medium-term (cash) and
long-term (equity) compensation opportunities in accordance with
the breadth of the executives responsibility across the
Dover organization. Increasingly larger percentages are
allocated to long-term reward potential through equity awards
for persons who are in positions to most materially affect
Dovers overall profitability and growth. Operating company
management receive 27% of their respective reward opportunity in
the form of three-year cash incentive awards, the value of which
depends on the success of their operating unit, and 73% in the
form of equity awards, the value of which depends on the success
of Dover as a whole. Segment subsidiary officers receive 20% of
their reward opportunity in the form of cash incentive awards
and 80% in the form of equity awards. Corporate level officers
receive 6% of their reward opportunity in the form of cash
incentive awards and 94% in the form of equity awards.
17
Cash Performance Awards: The dollar value to
be applied to the cash performance award becomes the base amount
of that award. Cash performance awards are made annually for the
three-year performance period commencing with the year of the
award. Any payout of cash performance awards will occur three
years later, conditional upon the achievement of specified
financial performance criteria over the three-year period. For
example, payouts of cash incentive awards made in February 2007
are scheduled for payment in February 2010, subject to the
achievement of the performance criteria for the three years
2007, 2008 and 2009, compared to the actual performance in the
base year 2006. The actual cash payout, if any, is equal to the
cash performance award amount multiplied by a percentage which
is derived from a performance matrix, or table. The performance
matrix uses a combination of the following performance
parameters, using in each case the average of each factor over
the three-year performance period compared to the base year:
|
|
|
|
|
real (inflation adjusted) growth in earnings per share;
|
|
|
|
real (inflation adjusted) growth in operating earnings;
|
|
|
|
after-tax return on equity; and
|
|
|
|
after-tax return on investment.
|
For the corporate officers who have responsibility across the
entire Dover organization, including the chief executive officer
and the chief financial officer, the applicable parameters are
average (over three years) real growth in earnings per share and
after-tax return on equity as reported in Dovers public
financial statements. For those participating officers at
segment subsidiaries and operating companies, including the
other named executive officers, the applicable parameters are
average (over three years) real growth in operating earnings and
after-tax return on investment as applicable to their business
segment or operating company. In determining the amount of the
payouts to officers of the segment subsidiaries and operating
businesses, the results of businesses sold, including gains and
losses on the sale of those businesses, are excluded once the
businesses are sold, and all prior period results are restated
to reflect such sold businesses. In a few select situations,
adjustments are made to the performance criteria or the method
of calculating the payout with the approval of the compensation
committee. There is no payout if the three-year average growth
in earnings is below zero or if the three-year average return on
equity or return on investment is less than ten percent.
Since payouts under cash performance awards are based on
performance over a three-year period, Dover has adopted
transition rules for award recipients who transfer from one
Dover business to another. During the three years following the
transfer, payouts of cash performance awards continue to be
based on the original performance period cash awards granted
while the participant was at the former company. Any payout made
within the first year after the transfer is based on the
performance metrics applicable to the participants former
company, as that is the business over which the person had the
most control during the performance period. For payouts during
the second and third years following a transfer, the participant
has the option of selecting the performance metrics applicable
to either the former or current business. However, if the
performance metrics applicable to the current business are
selected for a possible payout in year two after a transfer, the
performance metrics applicable to the current business must also
be used for any payout in year three after a transfer.
These transition rules are applicable to Mr. Van Loan, one
of the named executive officers, in respect of the payout made
to him in February 2007 for his cash performance award
originally granted in February 2004. Mr. Van Loan became
President of Dover Technologies in May 2005. His 2007 payout was
based on the performance metrics applicable to the Everett
Charles Technologies operating company, based on his award as
President of Everett Charles Technologies in 2004.
SSAR Awards: Once the dollar value to be
applied to an SSAR grant is determined, that value is converted
into a number of SSARs by dividing that value by the fair market
value of Dover
18
stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of all SSARs (and
options granted in prior years) is the fair market value of
Dovers stock on the date of grant. All SSARs (and stock
options) have been granted with ten-year terms and are not
exercisable until three years after their grant.
Under the 2005 plan, the fair market value of Dover stock on the
date of grant is determined in good faith by the compensation
committee, taking into consideration the factors the committee
deems appropriate from time to time, typically the closing price
on the date of grant and the average of the high and low market
prices on the date of grant. Accordingly, prior to November
2006, the fair market value may have been lower or higher than
the closing price on the date of grant if the committee
determined that the closing price was not the best
representation of the fair market value of Dover common stock on
that day. In November 2006, in light of the new SEC regulations
relating to executive compensation disclosure, the committee
adopted a principle that, going-forward, no grant will be made
with an exercise price below the closing market price on the
date of grant.
Stockholding
Guidelines
Dover has no formal stock ownership requirement for its
executive officers. However, it expects that its senior
executive officers (or their family members) will hold the net
shares acquired by the executive officer as compensation from
Dover upon exercise of options or SSARs for the duration of the
officers employment with Dover, except in cases of special
need and in preparation for retirement.
Other
Executive Officer Benefits
Dover and most of its companies offer a 401(k) plan to
substantially all
U.S.-based
employees and provide a company matching contribution (the
amount of which varies depending on the operating unit where
such employees work) based on the amount contributed during the
course of the year by a plan participant. Some operating units
also make profit sharing contributions to the plan based on
various discretionary performance factors.
Dovers executive compensation program also includes the
ability of executive officers to participate in various
qualified and nonqualified employee benefit plans. Generally,
these benefits serve a different purpose than traditional
compensation, such as providing protection against financial
loss arising from illness, disability, death or retirement. Some
of these benefits are similar to those offered to other
employees. Others, with participation generally limited to
executive officers, are intended to enhance the tax efficiency
of benefits to the recipient or serve as a substitute for, or
enhance benefit opportunities lost due to, regulatory
contribution limits applicable with respect to Dovers
qualified plans.
Dover offers selected executive officers the opportunity to
participate in its Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which
is an unfunded nonqualified plan that provides enhanced
retirement benefits. In order to participate in the plan,
executives must have been granted cash performance or equity
awards in at least five years under the 2005 or 1995 plan and
have been formally designated as participants by Dovers
chief executive officer. The plan provides a benefit pursuant to
a formula in which two percent of a participants final
five-year average pay is multiplied by the participants
years of service (up to a maximum of 30 years) and then
reduced by the value of other retirement benefits the
participant will receive that are attributable to company
contributions under other qualified and nonqualified retirement
plans (including social security). In certain instances, in
order to facilitate the hiring of experienced, mid-career
executives, participants are credited with years of service
prior to their actual years of service with Dover for purposes
of determining their benefits under the plan. Unreduced plan
benefits are payable to a participant who retires after
attaining age 62 and completing 10 years of service,
and the plan provides benefits if
19
the participant becomes permanently disabled or dies before
retirement. For a detailed description of this plan, see
Pension Benefits below.
Dover also offers executive officers the opportunity to
participate in its deferred compensation plan. This plan allows
participants to elect to defer their receipt of the payment of
up to 50% of salary and 100% of bonus and any payout of a cash
performance award which is earned with respect to any year. This
affords tax planning benefits to participants. See
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation below for a
detailed description of this plan.
With respect to its pension and other similar benefit programs,
Dover has set a target at the median of comparable companies.
Although Dover has no executive employment contracts, it does
have double-trigger
change-in-control
agreements with each of the named executive officers and certain
other executive officers designed to encourage each such officer
to continue to carry out his or her duties with a Dover company
in the event of a change in control of Dover. The agreements
provide that if both (1) there is a change in control of
Dover and (2) within eighteen months following the change
in control the officers employment is terminated either by
Dover for other than cause, disability
or death or by such officer for good reason (all as
defined in the agreements), then such officer will receive a
lump sum payment equal to three times the base salary in effect
prior to that time plus the average annual bonus earned by the
officer during the three prior years. The terms of these
agreements are described in greater detail below.
Under the terms of various Dover benefit plans, a change in
control of Dover will cause acceleration of the availability and
payout of benefits, including that all outstanding cash
performance awards will immediately vest and be paid and all
outstanding stock options and SSARs will immediately vest and
become exercisable. Most executive officers, including all
senior executives, may not receive any payments under these
agreements until six months after separation from Dover.
Perquisites
Dover does not provide significant perquisites to its executive
officers. In keeping with its decentralized management style,
Dover has no executive perquisite program. Management and the
compensation committee believe that providing significant
perquisites to executive officers would not be consistent with
Dovers overall compensation philosophy. As seen in the
notes to the Summary Compensation Table below, only two of the
five named executive officers received more than $10,000 in
perquisites in 2006.
Regulatory
Considerations
Dover takes into consideration applicable tax, securities laws
and accounting regulations in structuring and modifying its
compensation arrangements and employee benefit plans and, as it
deems appropriate, making individual compensation decisions.
Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code limits the ability of a public
corporation such as Dover to take an income tax deduction of
compensation in excess of $1 million to specified executive
officers unless the compensation is paid under a
stockholder-approved plan and is based on objective performance
criteria. Dovers general policy is to structure individual
compensation and compensation programs to allow the company to
fully deduct compensation in accordance with
Section 162(m). Accordingly, as discussed above,
Dovers bonus incentive plan is designed to satisfy the
requirements of Section 162(m), as are both the equity and
cash incentive portions of the long-term incentive plan. Until
2007, the salary of Dovers chief executive officer has
been limited to $1 million per year and annual bonuses were
increased to maintain total competitive compensation, based on
TCM data and overall market conditions.
20
Dover believes that tax deductibility of compensation is an
important factor in setting executive compensation policy and in
rewarding superior executive performance. However, the
compensation committee retains the authority to approve the
payment of compensation that may not be deductible if it
believes such payments would be in the best interest of
Dovers stockholders. All compensation paid to the
executive officers for 2006 qualified as fully deductible for
federal income tax purposes, although this will not be the case
for the chief executive officers salary in 2007.
Section 409A. Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code imposes certain restrictions on
Dovers discretion with respect to early retirement and
other matters under various of its nonqualified employee benefit
plans and has required changes in the provisions and
administration of these plans. These regulations largely limit
the ability of senior executives to withdraw funds from
Dovers nonqualified plans and delay for six months
following termination of employment certain payments or
distributions to specified employees, as defined in
Section 409A, who are generally the 50 highest paid
employees of the Dover companies. Dover is revising its plans
and practices to comply with these requirements and considering
their impact on its overall executive compensation program.
Compensation
Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed with
management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the
compensation committee recommended to the board of directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended
December 31, 2006 be included in Dovers Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
and in this proxy statement.
|
|
Compensation Committee:
|
Richard K. Lochridge (Chair)
|
Robert W. Cremin
Jean-Pierre M. Ergas
Kristiane C. Graham
21
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
The Summary Compensation Table below shows all remuneration paid
by Dover and its subsidiaries to the following officers for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Dovers chief executive officer,
|
|
|
|
Dovers chief financial officer; and
|
|
|
|
the three other most highly paid Dover senior executive officers
for 2006.
|
The determination of the most highly paid senior executive
officers is based on total compensation paid or accrued for
2006, excluding changes in the actuarial value of defined
benefit plans and earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation
balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Deferral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,885,049
|
|
|
|
1,013,727
|
|
|
|
1,866,242
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
9,074,562
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
746,280
|
|
|
|
424,356
|
|
|
|
571,806
|
|
|
|
9,557
|
|
|
|
2,866,999
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
838,661
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,204,136
|
|
|
|
9,525
|
|
|
|
5,502,322
|
|
Vice President of Dover, Director
and President of Dover Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
790,744
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
848,636
|
|
|
|
33,966
|
|
|
|
4,883,346
|
|
Vice President of Dover, Director
and President of Dover Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
630,000
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
754,802
|
|
|
|
1,113,181
|
|
|
|
497,781
|
|
|
|
35,300
|
|
|
|
3,881,064
|
|
Vice President of Dover, Director
and President of Dover Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Bonus amounts represent payments
made in the first quarter of 2007 for the year ended
December 31, 2006, under the bonus incentive plan. The
bonus incentive plan constitutes a non-equity incentive plan
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123(R). Although they are based on satisfaction of
pre-established performance targets, these amounts are reported
in the bonus column rather than the non-equity incentive plan
compensation column to make clear that they are annual bonus
payments for 2006 and to distinguish them from the payouts under
the cash performance program for the three-year performance
period ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These amounts represent the
compensation cost of outstanding option and SSAR awards granted
in 2006 and prior years, calculated and expensed by the company
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123(R) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, and do not correspond to the actual value that might be
recognized by the named executives. For a discussion of the
assumptions relating to calculation of the cost of equity
awards, see Note 10 to the Notes to the Financial
Statements contained in Dovers
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Amounts represent the payouts
earned under Dovers cash performance program of the 2005
plan for the three-year performance period ended on
December 31, 2006. The actual payouts were made during the
first quarter of 2007. See the column under Note (1) for
additional amounts paid as non-equity incentive plan
compensation.
|
22
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Amounts shown for
Messrs. Hoffman, Kuhbach and Ropp represent Dover matching
contributions under the 401(k) plan, amounts shown for
Mr. Sandker reflect matching contributions to the 401(k)
plan, an annual car allowance of $19,200, and $5,210 of imputed
income related to company-paid commuting expenses, and amounts
shown for Mr. Van Loan reflect matching contributions to
the 401(k) plan, profit sharing amounts and an annual car
allowance of $14,400.
|
GRANTS OF
PLAN-BASED AWARDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
169,609
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
2,885,049
|
|
|
|
46.11
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
498,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,500,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
43,873
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
746,280
|
|
|
|
46.11
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
128,820
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,695,000
|
|
|
|
2,542,500
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
49,304
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
838,661
|
|
|
|
46.11
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
567,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
|
2,625,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
46,487
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
790,744
|
|
|
|
46.11
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
534,600
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,650,000
|
|
|
|
2,475,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
44,374
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
754,802
|
|
|
|
46.11
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
510,300
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/06
|
(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
2,362,500
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the minimum amount
payable for a certain level of performance.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Not offered.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Not offered.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Represents an award of
stock-settled stock appreciation rights under Dovers 2005
plan. The SSARs will not be exercisable until February 2,
2009. The grant date fair value is calculated in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R),
using a Black-Scholes value of $17.01 per SSAR.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents an award under the cash
performance program of the 2005 plan made on February 2,
2006 for the three-year performance measurement period of 2006
through 2008. The actual cash payout, if any, at the end of the
three-year performance measurement period will be equal to the
award amount multiplied by a percentage which is derived from a
performance matrix. The target amount shown assumes the award
amount is multiplied by 100%. The highest multiplier possible
under the program is 1,562%, provided that no participant
receives a payout in any year greater than $2,000,000. In
addition, the aggregate amount of payouts to a business
units employees may not exceed 30% of that business
units average annual earnings increase over the
performance measurement period. There is no payout unless
specified performance criteria are met. See Executive
Compensation Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amounts shown in this row
reflect the potential payouts in February 2007 for 2006 under
the bonus incentive plan. The threshold, target and maximum
amounts assume, respectively, less than 50%, 100% and 150%
satisfaction of the participants performance goal for
2006. The bonus amount actually paid in February 2007 is
disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the column
Bonus for 2006 for the executive officer. No future
payout will be made under this award. For a discussion of the
bonus incentive plan and the 2006 payouts, see
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Components Annual Compensation.
|
23
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards: Market or
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Payout Value of
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Unearned Shares,
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
That
|
|
|
Shares, Units
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
That
|
|
|
Have
|
|
|
or Other
|
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Not
|
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,609
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
2/2/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,421
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,533
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.25
|
|
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,041
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.50
|
|
|
|
2/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,500
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,634
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.00
|
|
|
|
2/8/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,873
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
2/2/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,760
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,596
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.25
|
|
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,608
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.50
|
|
|
|
2/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,582
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,046
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.00
|
|
|
|
2/8/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,568
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,549
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
2/4/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,562
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.00
|
|
|
|
2/5/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,738
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.71
|
|
|
|
2/6/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,304
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
2/2/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,274
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,127
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.25
|
|
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,122
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.50
|
|
|
|
2/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,670
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,416
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.00
|
|
|
|
2/8/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
2/4/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,988
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.00
|
|
|
|
2/5/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,487
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
2/2/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,142
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,913
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.25
|
|
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,939
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.50
|
|
|
|
2/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,363
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,561
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.00
|
|
|
|
2/8/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,374
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.00
|
|
|
|
2/2/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,411
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,335
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.25
|
|
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,135
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.50
|
|
|
|
2/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,561
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.00
|
|
|
|
2/14/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,422
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.00
|
|
|
|
2/8/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
|
|
2/10/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,727
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
2/4/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,612
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.00
|
|
|
|
2/5/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
None of the named executive
officers has outstanding stock awards.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation
rights that are not exercisable until February 2, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Stock options that are not
exercisable until February 10, 2008.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 12, 2007.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 13, 2006.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 14, 2005.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 8, 2004.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 10, 2003.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 4, 2002.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 5, 2001.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Stock options that became
exercisable on February 6, 2000.
|
24
Equity Plans. The awards shown in the
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table
are grants of options or, beginning in 2006, SSARs, granted
under the 2005 plan or its predecessor, the 1995 plan. The 1995
plan expired in January 2005 and was replaced by the 2005 plan.
Options granted under either plan have similar terms.
The 2005 plan provides for stock option, SSAR, restricted stock
and cash incentive awards. Dover reserved a maximum aggregate of
20,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the
2005 plan during its
10-year
term. Of the shares authorized for issuance under the 2005 plan,
only a maximum aggregate of 5% of the shares may be granted as
restricted stock. Options granted under the 2005 plan may be
either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options
within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code. Grants and awards may be made by the compensation
committee at any time or from time to time before
January 31, 2015, provided that no incentive stock options
may be granted after February 11, 2014.
No single recipient may be granted options
and/or SSARs
for more than 600,000 shares in any year. Options and SSARs
have a term not exceeding ten years and become exercisable after
not less than three years from their date of grant, except in
special circumstances such as upon a change in control or a
recipients death or permanent disability. Generally, stock
options are not transferable, except that nonqualified options
may be transferred to members of the holders immediate
family (or a trust for the benefit of one or more of such family
members), but any such transferred options cannot be further
transferred by the transferee during the transferees
lifetime. SSARs are not transferable except by bequest or
inheritance.
The primary difference between options and SSARs is in the
method of exercise. To exercise an option, the holder must pay
to Dover the exercise price and the withholding taxes triggered
by the exercise. By contrast, the holder of a vested SSAR will
only have to notify Dover of the SSAR exercise and specify the
number of SSARs being exercised. Dover will then calculate the
gain measured by the difference between the exercise price and
the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise,
withhold the appropriate amount of tax, divide the remaining
gain by the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise
and deliver the resulting number of whole shares to the holder.
Because of this issuance of a net number of shares, the number
of shares issued upon exercise of SSARs will be less than upon
exercise of stock options covering the same initial number of
shares.
OPTION
EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
20,980
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
23,782
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
19,290
|
|
|
|
432,073
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
6,264
|
|
|
|
145,019
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the exercise on
February 15, 2006 of a stock option granted on
February 10, 2000 for 2,603 shares at an exercise
price of $39.00 per share and of a stock option granted on
February 5, 1998 for 1,972 shares at an exercise price
of $35.00 per share. The closing price of Dovers
common stock on the NYSE on February 15, 2006 was $47.06.
The value realized on exercise provided in the table
represents the difference between the closing price on the
exercise date and the exercise price multiplied by the number of
shares underlying each option exercised.
|
25
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the exercise on
January 31, 2006 of a stock option granted on
February 8, 1999 for 19,290 shares at an exercise
price of $23.5312 per share. The closing price of
Dovers common stock on the NYSE on January 31, 2006
was $45.93.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents the exercise on
April 7, 2006 of a stock option granted on February 8,
1997 for 6,264 shares at an exercise price of $24.7187 per
share. The closing price of Dovers common stock on the
NYSE on April 7, 2006 was $47.87.
|
PENSION
BENEFITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years
|
|
Normal
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Payments during
|
|
|
|
|
Credited Service
|
|
Retirement Age
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
Name
|
|
Plan name
|
|
(#)(1)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
7
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
151,941
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
15.6 (actual + prior service credit)
|
|
|
62 with
10 years service
|
|
|
|
4,924,870
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
14
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
326,700
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
18.8 (actual + prior
service credit)
|
|
|
62 with
10 years service
|
|
|
|
3,058,105
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
9
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
229,546
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
15.5 (actual + prior service credit)
|
|
|
62 with
10 years service
|
|
|
|
3,197,511
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
37.6(4)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
779,716
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
37.3(5) (actual)
|
|
|
62 with
10 years service
|
|
|
|
4,170,349
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
SERP
|
|
15.6 (actual + prior service credit)
|
|
|
62 with
10 years service
|
|
|
|
1,876,422
|
|
|
Not Offered
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Messrs. Hoffman, Kuhbach,
Ropp and Van Loan are eligible for prior service credit of 5.8,
5.1, 6.8 and 5.7 years, respectively. The increase in
present value of benefits due to their prior service credit is:
Hoffman: $2,647,991; Kuhbach: $976,012; Ropp: $1,948,268; Van
Loan: $964,098.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount includes the value of
contributions made by the named executives throughout their
careers.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Dovers pension plan and SERP
do not allow distributions to participants while employed at
Dover.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Limited to 35 years under the
provisions of the plan.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Limited to 30 years under the
provisions of the plan.
|
Pension
Plan
The Dover Corporation Pension Plan (the pension
plan) is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan covering
certain salaried and hourly employees of Dover and its domestic
subsidiaries who are US citizens and tax residents, and
generally have attained age 21 and completed one year of
employment. A number of Dover operating companies and one
segment subsidiary do not participate in the pension plan and
Mr. Van Loan does not participate in the pension plan.
Generally, vesting of qualified pension benefits occurs after
completion of five years of employment or, if earlier, upon
reaching normal retirement age, which, for purposes of the
pension plan, is the first day of the month coincident with or
next following an employees 65th birthday.
The benefit is based generally upon:
|
|
|
|
|
final average compensation, defined as the highest 60
consecutive months of compensation out of the last
120 months of employment, and
|
|
|
|
years of service credit (to a maximum of 35 years).
|
26
Compensation for pension plan purposes includes base pay, annual
bonus, commissions, overtime, holiday pay, vacation pay and
certain amounts contributed by employees to benefit plans, but
excludes any payments of stock option, SSAR or restricted stock
awards under the 2005 plan or the 1995 plan, expense
reimbursements, payments from or Dover contributions to benefit
plans, sign-on, stay or retention bonuses, severance pay, or
special allowance or premium pay with respect to employment
outside the United States. Compensation is limited to the annual
statutory limit for tax-qualified pension plans ($225,000 for
2007). Benefits at a participants normal retirement age
under the pension plan are equal to 1% of the participants
final average compensation up to the Social Security integration
level (SSIL) plus 1.5% of final average compensation in excess
of the SSIL, multiplied by the participants years of
actual service under the pension plan to a maximum of
thirty-five years. The SSIL is 158% of the Social Security wage
bases averaged over the 35 years prior to the year of
calculation. A participant who remains in service after his or
her normal retirement age continues to accrue benefits under the
pension plan. All persons named in the Pension Benefits Table
who participate in the pension plan have become vested in their
pension plan benefits and, therefore, are eligible, upon
termination of employment, to begin receiving benefits before
normal retirement age, in which case the benefit would be
reduced if paid prior to their normal retirement ages based on
the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
0.5555% per month from
ages 60-65;
|
|
|
|
0.2778% per month from
ages 55-60; and
|
|
|
|
further reduced prior to age 55 with actuarial factors set
forth in the pension plan.
|
Alternatively, payment of the benefit can be deferred until
normal retirement age.
A qualified plan election generally is required in order for
benefits to commence. Benefits will be paid as a single life
annuity if the employee is not married at the benefit
commencement date, or as a joint and 50% survivor annuity with
the participants spouse as the joint annuitant if the
employee is married on such date. Other forms of payment may be
elected, including a lump sum payment, 5 year certain and
life annuity (meaning a guaranteed benefit for 5 years to
the employee and if the employee dies before this period ends,
the remaining guaranteed payments will be made to his or her
beneficiary), 10 year certain and life annuity, single life
annuity and joint and 100% survivor annuity. A vested
participant who becomes permanently disabled prior to retirement
may elect to receive either an unreduced immediate benefit or an
enhanced deferred benefit, and benefits also are payable to the
spouse of a participant who dies prior to retirement.
SERP
The Dover Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(the SERP) is an unfunded nonqualified plan that
provides enhanced retirement benefits. Eligibility for, and
vesting of, SERP benefits occur when an employee
|
|
|
|
|
has been granted an equity or cash incentive award in each of
five years (not necessarily consecutive) under either the 1995
plan or the 2005 plan, and
|
|
|
|
was employed by a Dover company that participates in the SERP on
the date the fifth or a later such award was granted, and
|
|
|
|
has received a written designation by the chief executive
officer of Dover as an actual participant.
|
Benefits under the SERP are determined as (A) times
(B) times (C) reduced by (D):
(A) 2% of the participants final average compensation
(defined as the highest 60 consecutive months of compensation
out of the last 120 months of employment) multiplied by
(B) the participants years of actual service plus
prior service credit (limited to a combined maximum of
30 years), multiplied by
27
(C) if the participant elects to have payment of benefits
commence prior to his or her 65th birthday, an early
retirement reduction factor, based on the participants age
and service at termination (as described below), reduced by
(D) all company provided benefits paid or accrued under all
other qualified and nonqualified plans sponsored by Dover,
including the employer-paid portion of Social Security or other
benefits provided from a governmental plan, but excluding
offsets for elective deferrals of employee compensation plus
associated earnings under any such plan (e.g., employee
contributions to the 401(k) plan or the deferred compensation
plan and earnings attributable to such contributions).
Compensation for SERP purposes is the same as that under the
pension plan, except that the statutory limitation with respect
to the amount of compensation that can be considered under a
tax-qualified plan does not apply.
Participants who were at least age forty on their first birthday
following their date of hire (or the acquisition of their
employer) by a Dover company and received an equity or cash
incentive award under the 1995 or 2005 plan within
24 months after such hire (or acquisition) date
(mid-career hires) are eligible to receive years of
service credit equal to one-fourth of the number of years that
have elapsed from the participants twenty-fifth birthday
to the date he or she was hired (or acquired) by a Dover company
(prior service credit). However, certain conditions
apply to such participants who were hired after
December 31, 2004. For purposes of granting prior service
credit to participants, there are two levels of application:
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-career hires who were hired prior to January 1, 2005
will automatically receive prior service credit and such prior
service credit will count towards the calculation of their
benefit and towards the years of service criteria for
determining early retirement reduction factors, and
|
|
|
|
Mid-career hires who were hired after December 31, 2004 may
receive prior service credit if the chief executive officer of
Dover approves such prior service credit before the participant
is designated as an actual participant. However, such prior
service credit will be phased in over four years and will count
towards the calculation of their benefit but not towards the
years of service criteria for early retirement without penalty.
|
Normal retirement age is 65 and early retirement reduction
factors apply to participants who retire before that age except
that a participant may retire at age 62 without penalty if
the participant has at least 10 years of service (if hired
prior to 2005, service includes prior service credit). All named
executive officers are eligible to receive unreduced early
retirement benefits if they retire or terminate employment after
attaining age 62.
The table below summarizes the application of the early
retirement factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Retirement Factor Application
|
At This Age:
|
|
Less than 10 years of service(1)
|
|
10 or more years of service(1)
|
|
Age 55 through 65
|
|
0.4167% for each month that such
termination/retirement precedes age 65
|
|
0.4167% for each month that such
termination/retirement precedes age 62
|
Prior to Age 55
|
|
50% reduced by
|
|
65% reduced by
|
|
|
0.250% per
month from age 45 through 54
|
|
0.250% per
month from age 45 through 54
|
|
|
0.083% per
month from age 35 through 44
|
|
0.083% per
month from age 35 through 44
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
If hired prior to January 1,
2005, service includes actual service plus prior service credit.
If hired after December 31, 2004, service includes actual
service only.
|
28
A participant who becomes permanently disabled will continue to
accrue years of service credits under the SERP during the period
of disability and will be entitled to receive a benefit as
described above, based on his or her final five-year average
compensation at the time that the disability commences, when the
participant subsequently terminates employment. The spouse or
other beneficiary of a participant who dies prior to
commencement of benefit payments from the SERP will receive a
lump sum death benefit in the amount that the participant would
have received had he or she otherwise terminated employment or
retired and been entitled to a lump sum payment of his or her
benefit.
SERP benefits that have a present value of $500,000 or less will
be paid in a single lump sum payment within 30 days of
termination of employment (or on the first day of the seventh
month following termination, if the employee is a
specified employee, as defined in Internal Revenue
Code Section 409A). If the present value of a SERP benefit
exceeds $500,000, 75% of the present value of the benefit will
be paid as a lump sum at the termination of employment or
retirement (or on the first day of the seventh month following
termination, if the employee is a specified
employee, as defined in Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A) with the remainder paid in five annual
installments commencing one year after the termination of
employment.
Lump sum payments from the SERP will be calculated on the same
basis as is used for calculating lump sum payments from the
pension plan, except that the discount rate with respect to
executives who have not attained age 55 and completed
10 years of actual service will be the greater of the
pension plans lump sum rate and the discount rate used
with respect to the pension plan for financial accounting
purposes. SERP benefits generally will be paid as soon as
practicable after a participants retirement. The SERP
benefit of a specified employee (as defined above)
for whom payment is delayed for six months after retirement will
be credited with interest at the rate used to calculate lump sum
benefits with respect to the period of delay. An election to
delay the timing (but not change the form) of distribution of
the SERP benefit must be made at least one year prior to
termination of employment/retirement, and if such an election is
made, the payment of the SERP benefit must be delayed by at
least 5 years from either the date of
termination/retirement or the prior date elected.
Grandfathered
SERP Benefits
SERP participants who, as of December 31, 2004, were
age 55 and whose actual service and prior service credit
totaled at least 10 years are considered grandfathered
participants and have additional flexibility regarding receipt
of the portion of their SERP benefit accrued through
December 31, 2004 (grandfathered SERP benefit),
based on the provisions of the SERP in effect at that time.
The forms of payment of the grandfathered SERP benefits are the
same as those under the pension plan. Any grandfathered SERP
benefit which has a present value of $50,000 or less is
automatically distributed in a lump sum shortly after
termination of employment. A grandfathered SERP benefit which
has a present value greater than $50,000 may be paid in a lump
sum only with the approval of the pension committee. A
participant who has made a timely election to receive an annuity
form of payment can elect another annuity form of payment (or
elect another beneficiary, if applicable), regardless of the
rules described above, if the participant can demonstrate that
there has been a relevant change in family circumstances since
the prior election was made. For executives with a grandfathered
SERP benefit, an election regarding the time and form of the
distribution of the grandfathered SERP benefit is required to be
made at least one year prior to termination of employment or
retirement. If no such distribution election is made, the
payment of the grandfathered SERP benefit will be made according
to the time and form of pension plan payments (or payments under
another qualified defined benefit plan of a Dover affiliate in
which the SERP participant is participating), unless the
executive is not a participant in the pension plan (or another
qualified defined benefit plan of a Dover affiliate), in which
case payment of the grandfathered SERP benefit will begin at
age 65 in the form of a joint and 50% survivor annuity (if
the participant is married),
29
with the participants spouse as the joint annuitant, or a
single life annuity (if the participant is not married).
The grandfathered SERP benefit may be rolled over to the
deferred compensation plan if an election under both the SERP
and the deferred compensation plan is made at least one year in
advance of termination of employment or retirement. In addition,
the grandfathered SERP benefit will not be subject to the six
month delay for any executive who is a specified
employee as described above.
All named executive officers are entitled to a grandfathered
SERP benefit.
NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contributions
|
|
|
contributions
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
withdrawals/
|
|
|
balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in last FY
|
|
|
in last FY
|
|
|
in last FY
|
|
|
distributions
|
|
|
last FYE
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
Dover Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54,950
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
516,380
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
Dover Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
343,876
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
192,340
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,290,571
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
Dover Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
228,900
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
59,635
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
878,367
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
Dover Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
295,200
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
257,122
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
David R. Van Loan(1)
|
|
|
Dover Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Van Loan has elected not
to participate in the deferred compensation plan.
|
Deferred
Compensation Plan
The Dover Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the
deferred compensation plan) is an unfunded
nonqualified plan maintained for the purpose of making available
the option to defer receipt of current compensation to a select
group of management or highly compensated employees (as that
phrase is defined under Title I of ERISA) of Dover and its
subsidiary corporations, where the term subsidiary
corporation is defined as set forth under Internal Revenue
Code Section 424(f). All amounts deferred are from the
salary (base pay), bonus or cash performance program payouts
which the participant was entitled to receive in the year of
deferral. Dover has established a non-qualified grantor trust
(the trust), with a bank as the trustee thereof, to
hold certain amounts deferred under the deferred compensation
plan. These amounts are considered general assets of Dover and
are available to Dovers creditors in the event of
Dovers insolvency. Amounts held in the trust are invested
by the trustee using various investment vehicles including the
purchase of insurance contracts on the lives of certain
participants.
Employees eligible for the deferred compensation plan are key
management or highly compensated employees who are selected by
the deferred compensation plans administrative committee
and who meet the following requirements at the time of filing an
election to defer compensation under the deferred compensation
plan:
|
|
|
|
|
are on a regular periodic U.S. payroll of Dover or its
subsidiary corporations;
|
|
|
|
are expected to have a combination of annual salary (base pay)
and bonus in excess of the compensation limits applicable to
tax-qualified pension plans for the year ($225,000 for 2007);
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
are hired or promoted prior to October 1 of the year in
which they otherwise meet the requirements to become
eligible; and
|
|
|
|
are currently participating in or, if newly hired or promoted,
are expected to be granted in the next calendar year an equity
or cash incentive award under the 2005 plan.
|
Each year by November 30th, participants can elect to defer
salary that would otherwise be paid during the next calendar
year and to defer the bonus, cash performance payment, and other
compensation paid in the second calendar year following the
election. Amounts that may be deferred are up to 50% of salary
(base pay), up to 100% or a set dollar amount of bonus
and/or up to
100% or a set dollar amount of cash performance compensation,
but in all events the minimum aggregate amount deferred during a
plan year must be $5,000. All such deferral elections are
irrevocable. Dover may also make discretionary contributions on
behalf of participants but has never done so and does not
currently expect to do so. Participants are offered certain
investment options and can choose how they wish to allocate
their deferrals among those investment options. Although
participants do not own shares in the investment options
selected, their accounts are credited with the net returns of
the investment options they selected and in which their
deferrals are deemed to be invested. Participants may change the
individual options selected on a monthly basis. Participants are
100% vested in all amounts deferred, and any earnings and losses
on such deferred amounts. If there are any company
contributions, they will be vested as determined by the deferred
compensation plans administrative committee.
A participant who makes a deferral election for a year may also
elect, with respect to the compensation being deferred for that
year, the timing and form for the payment of benefits which will
apply if the participants account value is more than
$50,000 as of the January 31st following the year in
which any event triggering distribution (such as retirement)
occurs or if the participant terminates employment on account of
retirement or disability, as defined under the deferred
compensation plan. Account balances of $50,000 or less are
distributed in a lump sum.
Generally, disbursements of deferred amounts must be either on
account of retirement, disability or any other termination of
service, or at the time of a scheduled in-service withdrawal
date chosen by the participant. On demand in-service
distributions are permitted with respect to amounts deferred as
of December 31, 2004, as adjusted for earnings and losses
(the grandfathered deferred compensation plan), and
require forfeiture of 10% of the amount of the distribution
requested. The participant may also elect to have a lump sum
amount from the grandfathered SERP benefit rolled over to the
grandfathered deferred compensation plan, and have such amount
distributed in accordance with the distribution dates allowable
under the deferred compensation plan. Any such rollover must be
elected (and may be revoked) not less than 12 months prior
to the participants retirement or termination of
employment. In addition, distributions on account of hardship,
as determined in the deferred compensation plans
administrative committees discretion, are permitted and in
the event a hardship distribution occurs, the participant may
not defer any compensation for the balance of that plan year.
Under the deferred compensation plan, retirement is deemed to
occur on or after the participant reaches his or her
65th birthday, the participant completes 10 years of
service and attains age 55, or, with respect to deferrals
under the grandfathered deferred compensation plan, the
participant completes such other criteria that the deferred
compensation plans administrative committee determines is
sufficient to grant an approved earlier retirement date.
Distributions triggered by retirement may be deferred but not
later than the last day of the first quarter following the
calendar year in which the participant attains age 70. Upon
retirement or disability, distributions of a participants
account may be made in the following forms: over a period
of 5, 10, or 15 years, or in a single lump sum. If no
election is made as to the form of distribution, the account is
automatically distributed in annual installments over a
10-year
period. Scheduled in-service withdrawals may be elected to be
distributed in a single lump sum, or annual installments
over 2, 3, 4, or 5 years. Distributions upon death or
other termination of service are made in a single lump sum
payment.
31
Changes in the form or timing of distributions (as elected
initially) may be made at any time but are not effective until
the later of 12 months after the election and retirement
(or the fixed date in the case of scheduled in-service
withdrawals). For scheduled in-service withdrawals, the only
change in election permitted is to extend (up to two times)
the date of payment, with the minimum period of such extension
being 5 years (2 years with respect to the
grandfathered deferred compensation plan) from the originally
scheduled date for the first extension, and five years
(2 years with respect to the grandfathered deferred
compensation plan) from the extended date with respect to the
second extension.
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A applies to all amounts
deferred under the deferred compensation plan that were earned
on and after January 1, 2005 (the 409A deferred
compensation plan). The same terms and conditions apply to
the 409A deferred compensation plan other than those requiring a
change to comply with Section 409A. Accordingly, the
payment date of the amounts under the 409A deferred compensation
plan will be delayed for six months for any executive who is a
specified employee (as described above), in which
case amounts under the 409A deferred compensation plan as of
termination of employment or retirement will be increased with
six months of earnings. In addition, on demand in-service
withdrawals under the 409A deferred compensation plan are not
allowed. The approved early retirement features of the deferred
compensation plan, which permitted distributions prior to
attainment of age 55 and 10 years of service, at the
discretion of the deferred compensation plans
administrative committee, are not applicable to the 409A
deferred compensation plan. Initial elections as to the form and
timing of distributions must be made at the same time as initial
deferral elections, for each plan year of participation. An
election to delay the timing
and/or
distribution of the 409A deferred compensation plan must be made
at least one year prior to the originally scheduled distribution
date, and must result in a delay of distribution of such amounts
by at least 5 years after the originally scheduled
distribution date.
POTENTIAL
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The discussion and tables below describe the compensation to
which each of the named executive officers would be entitled in
the event of termination of such executives employment or
a change in control.
As discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement, Dover companies
do not enter into employment contracts with their executives and
do not have a general severance policy applicable to all
employees. Accordingly, the named executive officers are
entitled to benefits upon termination of their employment only
as provided for in previously granted options, SSARs and cash
incentive grants under the 2005 plan and its predecessor, the
1995 plan, other benefits plans and in dual-trigger change in
control agreements.
409A Limitations. In compliance with Internal
Revenue Code Section 409A, an executive who is a
specified employee (as described above) at the time
of termination of employment may not receive a payment of any
compensation that is determined to be subject to Internal
Revenue Code Section 409A until six months after his or her
departure from Dover (including, but not limited to, certain
benefit payments on voluntary or involuntary termination, SERP
benefits other than grandfathered SERP benefits, and 409A
deferred compensation plan benefits).
Payments
Made Upon Termination (Without a Change in
Control)
Payments Made Upon Voluntary or Involuntry (Not for Cause)
Termination
A named executive officer whose employment terminates as a
result of voluntary departure or involuntary termination other
than for cause:
|
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to payment of cash performance awards for which
the performance period had been completed but payout had not yet
occurred;
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to exercise vested stock options or SSARs until
the end of three months following the date of termination or any
earlier expiration of the award;
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
will receive a single lump sum payment of amounts accrued and
vested in the deferred compensation plan and SERP (except the
grandfathered SERP benefit will be distributed as described
above); and
|
|
|
|
will forfeit cash performance awards for which the period had
not been completed and unexercisable stock options and SSARs and
unvested restricted stock awards.
|
A named executive officer whose employment is terminated by
Dover for cause will forfeit all outstanding cash and equity
awards under the 2005 and 1995 plans, whether or not vested or
exercisable. The executive will receive a payment of amounts
deferred and accrued in the deferred compensation plan and all
amounts vested in the SERP as described in the applicable plan
description above.
Payments
Made Upon Normal Retirement
A named executive officer who retires at the normal retirement
age under the applicable plan:
|
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to receive on the normal payout date the payout
of any previously-granted cash performance award that would have
been earned had he continued to be a Dover employee through the
payout date;
|
|
|
|
will continue to vest in options and SSARs held as of the
retirement date and may exercise them after vesting until the
earlier of the expiration of the award or the end of the
60 month period following retirement; and
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to receive payment of amounts deferred and
accrued in the deferred compensation plan and amounts vested in
the SERP in accordance with the terms of those plans and his
elections thereunder.
|
Under the 2005 and 1995 plans, normal retirement is defined as
retirement at age 62. For the definitions of normal
retirement under each of the deferred compensation plan, SERP
and pension plan, see the applicable plan description above.
Payments
made Upon Early Retirement
Early retirement is defined in each of the deferred compensation
plan, the SERP and the pension plan as described in the
applicable plan description above. With respect to awards under
the 2005 and 1995 plans, early retirement is defined as
termination for any reason other than normal retirement, death,
disability or cause, under one of the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
the executive has at least 10 years of service with a Dover
company and the sum of his or her age and years of service on
the date of termination equals at least 65 (the Rule of
65) and the executive voluntarily terminates employment on
at least 6 months notice;
|
|
|
|
the executive has at least 15 years of service with a Dover
company and the sum of his or her age and years of service on
the date of termination equals at least 70 (the Rule of
70) and the executive voluntarily terminates employment on
at least 6 months notice; or
|
|
|
|
the executives employment is terminated because the
company or line of business in which he or she is employed is
sold and the executive remains employed through the closing date
of the sale (sale of a company).
|
A named executive officer who takes early retirement (as defined
in the applicable plan):
|
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to receive payment of amounts deferred and
accrued in the deferred compensation plan and amounts vested in
the SERP in accordance with the terms of the plans and the
officers elections thereunder;
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to have his options and SSARs continue to vest
and be exercisable for a period of 24 months,
36 months or 12 months following the date of early
retirement under
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
the Rule of 65, the Rule of 70 or sale of a company,
respectively, provided that an executive who is eligible to
retire under the Rule of 65 or the Rule of 70 and who retires
upon the sale of a company will be entitled to have his options
and SSARs continue to vest and be exercisable in accordance with
the Rule of 65 or Rule of 70 treatment, as the case may be, and
further provided that options and SSARs can never be exercised
after the expiration of their
10-year
term; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject to the discretion of Dovers chief executive
officer, on the regular payout date, may receive all, some or
none of the remaining payouts of cash performance awards
outstanding on the date of early retirement under the Rule of 65
or the Rule of 70 (all outstanding cash performance awards are
canceled under early retirement upon the sale of a company).
|
Any person taking early retirement under the 2005 or 1995 plan
and not waiving the benefits of early retirement is deemed to
have expressly agreed not to compete with Dover or any Dover
company at which he or she was employed within the three years
immediately prior to termination, in the geographic area in
which Dover or the Dover company actively carried on business at
the end of the participants employment, for the period
during which early retirement affords the participant enhanced
benefits. These periods are:
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to stock options or SSARs, the additional period
allowed the participant for the exercise of options or SSARs
outstanding at termination of employment, as described
above; and
|
|
|
|
with respect to cash performance awards, the period until
payment is made following the end of the last applicable
performance period.
|
If the participant fails to comply with the non-compete
provision, the early retirement is automatically rescinded and
the participant forfeits the enhanced benefits referred to above
and must return to Dover the economic value previously realized
by reason of such benefits.
Payments
Made Upon Disability or Death
A named executive officer who dies or becomes permanently
disabled (or, if he has died, his beneficiary or estate):
|
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to receive on the normal payout date a portion
of each cash performance payout that he would have earned had he
continued to be a Dover employee through the payout or
distribution date; such portion is determined by multiplying the
full payout amount by a fraction, the numerator of which is the
number of months the executive was employed during the
performance measurement period and the denominator of which is
the total number of months in that period;
|
|
|
|
will become immediately vested in any unvested options or SSARs
and all options and SSARs may be exercised until the earlier of
their expiration date or the end of the 60 month period
following the executives death or disability; and
|
|
|
|
will be entitled to receive payment of all amounts deferred and
accrued in the deferred compensation plan and all amounts vested
in the pension plan and the SERP in accordance with the terms of
those plans and his elections thereunder.
|
The tables below show the aggregate amount of potential payments
and other benefits that each named executive officer (or his
beneficiary or estate) would have been entitled to receive if
his employment had terminated (other than as a result of a
change in control) on December 31, 2006. The amounts shown
assume that termination was effective as of December 31,
2006, include amounts earned through such time and are estimates
of the amounts which could have been paid out to the executives
upon their termination at that time. The actual amounts to be
paid out can only be determined at the time of each
executives separation from Dover. Annual bonuses are
discretionary and are therefore omitted from the tables. As of
December 31, 2006, none of Messrs. Hoffman,
34
Kuhbach, Ropp or Van Loan were eligible for normal retirement
(as defined in the applicable plans) or early retirement under
the Rule of 70 and Mr. Ropp was not eligible for early
retirement under the Rule of 65. As of December 31, 2006,
Mr. Sandker was not eligible for normal retirement (as
defined in the applicable plans). In addition, early retirement
upon sale of a company applies to a sale by Dover of one of its
companies and thus is not applicable to Mr. Hoffman or
Mr. Kuhbach. Accordingly, those events are not included in
the tables for such officers.
Ronald L.
Hoffman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not for Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Early Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Rule of 65 ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Cash performance award
|
|
|
1,013,727
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,487,727
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,495,727
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,495,727
|
(3)
|
Stock options/SSARs
|
|
|
2,412,160
|
(4)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,393,461
|
(5)
|
|
|
5,905,680
|
(6)
|
|
|
5,905,680
|
(6)
|
Retirement plan payments (SERP and
Pension plans)(7)
|
|
|
5,533,914
|
|
|
|
5,533,914
|
|
|
|
5,533,914
|
|
|
|
5,533,914
|
|
|
|
5,533,914
|
|
Deferred compensation plan(8)
|
|
|
516,380
|
|
|
|
516,380
|
|
|
|
516,380
|
|
|
|
516,380
|
|
|
|
516,380
|
|
Health and Welfare benefits(9)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
9,476,181
|
|
|
|
6,050,294
|
|
|
|
12,931,482
|
|
|
|
14,451,701
|
|
|
|
13,451,701
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This amount was earned as of
December 31, 2006, for the completed three-year performance
period 2004-2006. Except for a termination for
cause, none of the termination events in this table would
have any effect on the payout of this amount. This amount was
paid to the executive officer in February 2007 (see Summary
Compensation Table).
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
a payout on the cash performance award made in February 2005 for
the three-year performance period 2005-2007. This calculation
assumes (1) that the compensation committee approves a payout
for the 2005-2007 performance period but not for any other
performance periods that were incomplete as of the termination
date and (2) a payout of 100% of the base amount of the February
2005 award.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
prorated payouts at the 100% level of the other two cash
performance awards outstanding at the time of the
executives death or disability, paid on the regular payout
dates following the executives death or disability.
|
|
(4)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
outstanding vested options and SSARs as of December 31,
2006, which is the difference between the closing price of
$49.02 per share of Dover Common Stock on December 29,
2006, the last trading day of 2006, and the exercise price of
each option and SSAR award multiplied by the number of shares
covered by such award. All such vested options and SSARs would
continue to be exercisable for up to three months following the
executives voluntary or involuntary (not for cause)
termination.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (4), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 24 months following the
executives retirement.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
all vested and unvested options and SSARs. All unvested options
and SSARs immediately vest and become exercisable upon the
executives death or disability.
|
|
(7)
|
|
These amounts reflect benefits
accrued under the plans as of December 31, 2006; no
increase in such benefits would result from the termination
event.
|
35
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
These amounts reflect compensation
deferred by the executive and earnings accrued thereon under the
plan as of December 31, 2006; no increase in such benefits
would result from the termination event.
|
|
(9)
|
|
In the event of accidental death,
an additional $1,000,000 would be payable. Dovers
disability plan provides a benefit of $15,000 per month which is
offset by Dover provided retirement benefits. The SERP benefit
for Mr. Hoffman is greater than $15,000 per month so the
disability benefit under the plan is reduced to $0.
|
Robert G.
Kuhbach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not for Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Early Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Rule of 65 ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Cash performance award
|
|
|
424,356
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
547,485
|
(2)
|
|
|
549,385
|
(3)
|
|
|
549,385
|
(3)
|
Stock options/SSARs
|
|
|
4,156,013
|
(4)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,061,899
|
(5)
|
|
|
5,194,396
|
(6)
|
|
|
5,194,396
|
(6)
|
Retirement plan payments (SERP and
Pension plans)(7)
|
|
|
3,596,426
|
|
|
|
3,596,426
|
|
|
|
3,596,426
|
|
|
|
3,596,426
|
|
|
|
3,596,426
|
|
Deferred compensation plan(8)
|
|
|
1,290,571
|
|
|
|
1,290,571
|
|
|
|
1,290,571
|
|
|
|
1,290,571
|
|
|
|
1,290,571
|
|
Health and Welfare benefits(9)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
9,467,375
|
|
|
|
4,886,997
|
|
|
|
10,496,381
|
|
|
|
11,630,778
|
|
|
|
10,630,778
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This amount was earned as of
December 31, 2006, for the completed three-year performance
period 2004-2006. Except for a termination for
cause, none of the termination events in this table would
have any effect on the payout of this amount. This amount was
paid to the executive officer in February 2007 (see Summary
Compensation Table).
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
a payout on the cash performance award made in February 2005 for
the three-year performance period 2005-2007. This calculation
assumes (1) that the chief executive officer exercises his
discretion to approve a payout for the 2005-2007 performance
period but not for any other performance periods that were
incomplete as of the termination date and (2) a payout of 100%
of the base amount of the February 2005 award.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
prorated payouts at the 100% level of the other two cash
performance awards outstanding at the time of the
executives death or disability, paid on the regular payout
dates following the executives death or disability.
|
|
(4)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
outstanding vested options and SSARs as of December 31,
2006, which is the difference between the closing price of
$49.02 per share of Dover Common Stock on December 29,
2006, the last trading day of 2006, and the exercise price of
each option and SSAR award multiplied by the number of shares
covered by such award. All such vested options and SSARs would
continue to be exercisable for up to three months following the
executives voluntary or involuntary (not for cause)
termination.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (4), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 24 months following the
executives retirement.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
all vested and unvested options and SSARs. All unvested options
and SSARs immediately vest and become exercisable upon the
executives death or disability.
|
36
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
These amounts reflect benefits
accrued under the plans as of December 31, 2006; no
increase in such benefits would result from the termination
event.
|
|
(8)
|
|
These amounts reflect compensation
deferred by the executive and earnings accrued thereon under the
plan as of December 31, 2006; no increase in such benefits
would result from the termination event.
|
|
(9)
|
|
In the event of accidental death,
an additional $1,000,000 would be payable. Dovers
disability plan provides a benefit of $15,000 per month which is
offset by Dover provided retirement benefits. The SERP benefit
for Mr. Kuhbach is greater than $15,000 per month so the
disability benefit under the plan is reduced to $0.
|
David J.
Ropp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not for Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Early Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Upon Sale of
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Company ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Cash performance award
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
2,545,400
|
(3)
|
|
|
2,545,400
|
(3)
|
Stock options/SSARs
|
|
|
1,086,255
|
(4)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,452,432
|
(5)
|
|
|
2,221,469
|
(6)
|
|
|
2,221,469
|
(6)
|
Retirement plan payments (SERP and
Pension plans)(7)
|
|
|
3,524,059
|
|
|
|
3,524,059
|
|
|
|
3,524,059
|
|
|
|
3,524,059
|
|
|
|
3,524,059
|
|
Deferred compensation plan(8)
|
|
|
878,367
|
|
|
|
878,367
|
|
|
|
878,367
|
|
|
|
878,367
|
|
|
|
878,367
|
|
Health and Welfare benefits(9)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
7,488,681
|
|
|
|
4,402,426
|
|
|
|
7,854,858
|
|
|
|
10,169,295
|
|
|
|
9,169,295
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This amount was earned as of
December 31, 2006, for the completed three-year performance
period 2004-2006. Except for a termination for
cause, none of the termination events in this table would
have any effect on the payout of this amount. This amount was
paid to the executive officer in February 2007 (see Summary
Compensation Table).
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount is the payout
described in note (1) for the completed three-year performance
period
2004-2006.
All other outstanding cash performance awards are cancelled upon
an executives early retirement upon the sale of a company.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
prorated payouts at the 100% level of the other two cash
performance awards outstanding at the time of the
executives death or disability, paid on the regular payout
dates following the executives death or disability.
|
|
(4)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
outstanding vested options and SSARs as of December 31,
2006, which is the difference between the closing price of
$49.02 per share of Dover Common Stock on December 29,
2006, the last trading day of 2006, and the exercise price of
each option and SSAR award multiplied by the number of shares
covered by such award. All such vested options and SSARs would
continue to be exercisable for up to three months following the
executives voluntary or involuntary (not for cause)
termination.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (4), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 12 months following the
executives retirement.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
all vested and unvested options and SSARs. All unvested options
and SSARs immediately vest and become exercisable upon the
executives death or disability.
|
37
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
These amounts reflect benefits
accrued under the plans as of December 31, 2006; no
increase in such benefits would result from the termination
event.
|
|
(8)
|
|
These amounts reflect compensation
deferred by the executive and earnings accrued thereon under the
plan as of December 31, 2006; no increase in such benefits
would result from the termination event.
|
|
(9)
|
|
In the event of accidental death,
an additional $1,000,000 would be payable. Dovers
disability plan provides a benefit of $15,000 per month which is
offset by Dover provided retirement benefits. The SERP benefit
for Mr. Ropp is greater than $15,000 per month so the disability
benefit under the plan is reduced to $0.
|
Timothy
J. Sandker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not for Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Under the
|
|
|
Upon Sale of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Rule of
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
70 ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Cash performance award
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,048,950
|
(2)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
2,521,100
|
(4)
|
|
|
2,521,100
|
(4)
|
Stock options/SSARs
|
|
|
1,362,074
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,471,394
|
(6)
|
|
|
2,471,394
|
(7)
|
|
|
2,471,394
|
(8)
|
|
|
2,471,394
|
(8)
|
Retirement plan payments (SERP and
Pension plans)(9)
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
Deferred compensation plan(10)
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
|
|
1,975,423
|
|
Health and Welfare benefits(11)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
10,646,947
|
|
|
|
7,284,873
|
|
|
|
12,805,217
|
|
|
|
11,756,267
|
|
|
|
13,277,367
|
|
|
|
12,277,367
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This amount was earned as of
December 31, 2006, for the completed three-year performance
period 2004-2006. Except for a termination for
cause, none of the termination events in this table would
have any effect on the payout of this amount. This amount was
paid to the executive officer in February 2007 (see Summary
Compensation Table).
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
payouts on the cash performance awards made in February 2005 and
February 2006 for the three-year performance periods 2005-2007
and 2006-2008, respectively. This calculation assumes (1) that
the chief executive officer exercises his discretion to approve
payouts for the 2005-2007 and 2006-2008 performance periods and
(2) payouts of 100% of the base amounts of the February 2005 and
February 2006 awards.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This amount is the payout
described in note (1) for the completed three-year performance
period 2004-2006. All other outstanding cash performance awards
are cancelled upon an executives early retirement upon the
sale of a company.
|
|
(4)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
prorated payouts at the 100% level of the other two cash
performance awards outstanding at the time of the
executives death or disability, paid on the regular payout
dates following the executives death or disability.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
outstanding vested options and SSARs as of December 31,
2006, which is the difference between the closing price of
$49.02 per share of Dover Common Stock on December 29,
2006, the last trading day of 2006, and the exercise price of
each option and SSAR award multiplied by the number of shares
covered by such award. All such vested options and SSARs would
continue to be exercisable for up to three months following the
executives voluntary or involuntary (not for cause)
termination.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (5), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 36 months following the
executives retirement.
|
38
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (5), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 36 months following the
executives retirement.
|
|
(8)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
all vested and unvested options and SSARs. All unvested options
and SSARs immediately vest and become exercisable upon the
executives death or disability.
|
|
(9)
|
|
These amounts reflect benefits
accrued under the plans as of December 31, 2006; no
increase in such benefits would result from the termination
event.
|
|
(10)
|
|
These amounts reflect compensation
deferred by the executive and earnings accrued thereon under the
plan as of December 31, 2006; no increase in such benefits
would result from the termination event.
|
|
(11)
|
|
In the event of accidental death,
an additional $1,000,00 would be payable. Dovers
disability plan provides a benefit of $15,000 per month which is
offset by Dover provided retirement benefits. The SERP benefit
for Mr. Sandker is greater than $15,000 per month so the
disability benefit under the plan is reduced to $0.
|
David R.
Van Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Not for
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Early Retirement
|
|
|
Upon Sale of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Under the Rule of
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
65 ($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Cash performance award
|
|
|
1,113,181
|
(1)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,400,056
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,113,181
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,474,531
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,474,531
|
(4)
|
Stock options/SSARs
|
|
|
944,648
|
(5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,280,960
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,280,960
|
(7)
|
|
|
1,414,970
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,414,970
|
(8)
|
Retirement plan payments (SERP and
Pension plans)(9)
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
Deferred compensation plan(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare benefits(11)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
4,114,041
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
4,737,228
|
|
|
|
4,450,353
|
|
|
|
5,945,713
|
|
|
|
4,945,713
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This amount was earned as of
December 31, 2006, for the completed three-year performance
period
2004-2006.
Except for a termination for cause, none of the
termination events in this table would have any effect on the
payout of this amount. This amount was paid to the executive
officer in February 2007 (see Summary Compensation Table).
|
|
(2)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
a payout on the cash performance award made in February 2005 for
the three-year performance period 2005-2007. This calculation
assumes (1) that the chief executive officer exercises his
discretion to approve a payout for the 2005-2007 performance
period but not for any other performance periods that were
incomplete as of the termination date and (2) payout of 100% of
the base amount of the February 2005 award.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This amount is the payout
described in note (1) for the completed three-year performance
period
2004-2006.
All other outstanding cash performance awards are cancelled upon
an executives early retirement upon the sale of a company.
|
|
(4)
|
|
This amount includes the payout
described in note (1) for the performance period 2004-2006, plus
prorated payouts at the 100% level of the other two cash
performance awards outstanding at the time of the
executives death or disability, paid on the regular payout
dates following the executives death or disability.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
outstanding vested options and SSARs as of December 31,
2006, which is the difference between the closing price of
$49.02 per share of Dover Common Stock on December 29,
2006, the last trading day of 2006, and the exercise price of
each option and SSAR award multiplied by
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares covered by
such award. All such vested options and SSARs would continue to
be exercisable for up to three months following the
executives voluntary or involuntary (not for cause)
termination.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (5), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 24 months following the
executives retirement.
|
|
(7)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
vested options and SSARs as of December 31, 2006, as
described in note (5), and the value of unvested options and
SSARs that would vest within 24 months following the
executives retirement.
|
|
(8)
|
|
This amount reflects the value of
all vested and unvested options and SSARs. All unvested options
and SSARs immediately vest and become exercisable upon the
executives death or disability.
|
|
(9)
|
|
These amounts reflect benefits
accrued under the plans as of December 31, 2006; no
increase in such benefits would result from the termination
event.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Mr. Van Loan has elected not to
participate in the deferred compensation plan.
|
|
(11)
|
|
In the event of accidental death,
an additional $1,000,000 would be payable. Dovers
disability plan provides a benefit of $15,000 per month which is
offset by Dover provided retirement benefits. The SERP benefit
for Mr. Van Loan is greater than $15,000 per month so the
disability benefit under the plan is reduced to $0.
|
Potential
Payments in Connection with a Change in Control (Without
Termination)
As discussed below, the payment of severance benefits following
a change in control is subject to a double-trigger
that is, such benefits are payable only upon certain specified
termination events following a change in control. However,
rights of an executive under the 2005 and 1995 plans, the
deferred compensation plan, the pension plan, the SERP and other
incentive and benefit plans are governed by the terms of those
plans and are effected by the change in control event itself,
even if the executive continues to be employed by Dover
following the change in control.
Under the 2005 and 1995 plans, upon a change in control, all
outstanding options and SSARs will immediately become
exercisable in accordance with the terms of the appropriate
stock option or SSAR agreement. All outstanding cash performance
awards immediately vest and become immediately due and payable.
The performance measurement period of all cash performance
awards outstanding terminates on the last day of the month prior
to the month in which the change in control occurs. The
participant is entitled to a cash payment, the amount of which
is determined in accordance with the plan and the relevant cash
performance award agreement, which is then multiplied by a
fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months the
participant was employed during the measurement period and the
denominator of which is the total number of months in the
performance measurement period.
Each person granted an option, SSAR, restricted stock or cash
performance award under the 2005 or 1995 plan is deemed to
agree, and each person who accepts a change in control agreement
agrees, that upon a tender or exchange offer, proxy solicitation
or other action seeking to effect a change in control of Dover,
he or she will not voluntarily terminate employment with Dover
or other Dover company employer and, unless terminated by Dover
or such Dover company, will continue to render services to Dover
or such Dover company until the person seeking to effect a
change in control of Dover has abandoned, terminated or
succeeded in such persons efforts to effect the change in
control.
Under the SERP, upon a change in control, each participant will
become entitled to receive the actuarial value of the
participants benefit accrued through the date of the
change in control within five days after the change in control
occurs. Under the deferred compensation plan, at least
30 days before the date the change in control is expected
to occur, Dover is required to contribute to the grantor trust
holding certain amounts deferred under the plan an amount equal
to (a) two times the
40
annual average total deferrals made to the plan during the prior
three years, plus (b) 125% of the amount by which the value
of all participants accounts in the plan as of
30 days prior to the expected date of the change in control
exceeds the liquidated value of the assets then held in the
trust. Amounts deferred under the plan will continue to accrue
any earnings and will be payable in accordance with the
elections made by the executive officer.
The following table shows the aggregate potential equity values
and potential payments under plans to which each of the named
executive officers would have been entitled upon a change in
control on December 31, 2006. Stock options and SSARs are
valued on the basis of the spread between their exercise price
and the last closing price of Dover common stock in 2006. The
deferred compensation plan amounts reflect a 5% forfeiture for
accelerated payout as required by law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options/
|
|
|
Cash Performance
|
|
|
SERP and Pension
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
SSARs
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Compensation Plan
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
5,905,680
|
|
|
|
1,468,727
|
|
|
|
5,533,914
|
|
|
|
490,561
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
5,194,396
|
|
|
|
668,022
|
|
|
|
3,596,426
|
|
|
|
1,226,042
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
2,221,469
|
|
|
|
2,514,800
|
|
|
|
3,524,059
|
|
|
|
834,449
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
2,471,394
|
|
|
|
2,491,963
|
|
|
|
5,309,450
|
|
|
|
1,876,652
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
1,414,970
|
|
|
|
1,452,387
|
|
|
|
2,056,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination Following a Change in
Control
Dover has double-trigger change in control agreements with each
of its named executive officers and certain other executive
officers which are designed to encourage each officer to
continue to carry out his or her duties with Dover in the event
of a change in control of Dover. Each of these agreements
requires a double-trigger, meaning that a change in
control alone does not give the named executive officer any
right to terminate his employment and receive severance
benefits. However, a change in control can result in increased
payments if it is followed by the executive officer resigning
for good reason or by Dover terminating the executive officer
other than for cause.
Under the change in control agreements, if an executive employee
is terminated by Dover for any reason other than
cause, death, or disability or the
executive resigns for good reason (as such terms are
defined in the agreement) within 18 months after a change
in control, the executive is entitled to severance benefits,
payable in a lump sum in cash (the lump sum amount),
equal to the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
three times the executives base salary immediately prior
to the date of termination or, if higher, immediately prior to
the first occurrence or circumstance constituting good
reason; and
|
|
|
|
three times the average annual bonus earned by the executive for
the three fiscal years ending immediately prior to the fiscal
year in which the termination date occurred, or if higher,
immediately prior to the fiscal year in which the change in
control occurred.
|
In addition, the executive is entitled to the life, accident and
health insurance plans that Dover provided prior to the change
in control (or equivalent benefits), at no direct cost to the
executive, for a period of three years from the date of
termination, and indemnification of the executive for any costs
incurred in any litigation or arbitration by any person in
connection with the enforcement or interpretation of the change
in control agreement, plus pre-judgment interest on any judgment
with respect thereto.
For purposes of these agreements, a change in
control occurs when:
|
|
|
|
|
a person becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of
Dovers outstanding common stock or the combined voting
power of outstanding securities, excluding any shares of stock
acquired from Dover or its affiliates;
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
existing members of the board of directors or persons whose
appointment or election by the board or nomination for election
by the stockholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at
least two-thirds of the incumbent directors whose appointment,
election or nomination was previously so approved or
recommended, cease to constitute a majority of the board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
there is a merger or other business combination of Dover or its
affiliates, except where the outstanding voting stock of Dover
constitutes at least 50% of the combined voting power of the
surviving entity, or the merger was effected to implement a
recapitalization of Dover where no person becomes a beneficial
owner of 20% or more of Dover common stock or the combined
voting power of outstanding shares; or
|
|
|
|
Dovers stockholders approve a plan of complete
liquidation, dissolution or sale of substantially all of its
assets, other than when the sale of assets is to an entity in
which 50% or more of the voting power is owned by the former
stockholders of Dover.
|
For purposes of the agreements, good reason means
when one of the following occurs after a change in control
without the executives consent:
|
|
|
|
|
any substantial diminution in the position or authority of the
executive which is inconsistent with the executives then
current position or authority;
|
|
|
|
any reduction of the executives base salary or incentive
compensation;
|
|
|
|
any requirement by Dover that the executive relocate his or her
primary office or location to any office or location more than
30 miles away from the location at which the executive was
based prior to the change in control (except for required travel
on business to an extent substantially consistent with business
travel obligations immediately prior to the change in control);
|
|
|
|
termination or material and adverse change to the
executives benefit, compensation or material fringe
benefit plans in which the executive participated immediately
prior to the change in control, or failure to provide the
executive with vacation time to which he or she was entitled;
|
|
|
|
failure to pay any portion or any installment of the
executives current or deferred compensation within
five days after payment of such compensation is due;
|
|
|
|
any purported termination of employment not effected pursuant to
a written notice of termination; or
|
|
|
|
failure by any successor of Dover to expressly adopt the change
in control agreement described above.
|
For purposes of the agreements, cause means the
executives willful and continual failure to perform the
executives duties, other than as the result of physical or
mental incapacity or disability (as defined in the agreement)
after 20 days notice thereof, or the executives
willful conduct materially and demonstrably injurious to Dover.
A determination of cause requires the agreement of 75% of
the members of the board of directors at a meeting called for
such purpose with reasonable notice to the executive and at
which the executive is given reasonable opportunity for the
executive and his or her representative to be heard.
Upon a change in control, the executive may be subject to excise
taxes pursuant to Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code. Section 280G imposes excise taxes on, and limits the
tax deductibility of, compensatory payments made by a
corporation to or for the benefit of specified individuals if
such payments are contingent upon a change in the ownership or
effective control of the corporation or in the ownership of a
substantial portion of the assets of the corporation, and have
an aggregate present value of more than three times the
individuals annualized includable compensation for the
base period, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Under the
change in
42
control agreements, Dover has agreed to reimburse the executive
for all excise taxes that are imposed on the executive under
Section 280G with respect to all or a portion of the lump
sum amount described above (depending on certain factors
involved in the calculation of such taxes) and any income or
excise taxes that are payable by the executive as a result of
Dovers reimbursement of such Section 280G excise
taxes. Dover does not provide any such reimbursement for any
excise taxes that become payable in connection with the change
in control and which are due in connection with other than the
payment of the lump sum described above, including the
acceleration of the payment of cash performance awards, SERP
benefits, or acceleration of vesting of SSARs, stock options or
restricted stock.
The following table shows the potential payments and other
benefits that each of the named executive officers would have
been entitled to receive under the change in control agreements
upon involuntary or good reason termination following a change
in control on December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum
|
|
|
Health and Welfare
|
|
|
280G Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
Benefits ($)
|
|
|
Gross-up
($)
|
|
|
Total ($)(1)
|
|
|
Ronald L. Hoffman
|
|
|
6,725,000
|
|
|
|
47,201
|
|
|
|
2,720,164
|
|
|
|
9,492,365
|
|
Robert G. Kuhbach
|
|
|
3,010,000
|
|
|
|
47,201
|
|
|
|
1,010,114
|
|
|
|
4,067,315
|
|
David J. Ropp
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
47,201
|
|
|
|
1,806,767
|
|
|
|
5,853,968
|
|
Timothy J. Sandker
|
|
|
3,130,000
|
|
|
|
47,201
|
|
|
|
948,945
|
|
|
|
4,126,149
|
|
David R. Van Loan
|
|
|
2,900,000
|
|
|
|
47,201
|
|
|
|
1,230,019
|
|
|
|
4,177,223
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For additional potential amounts
payable upon a change in control under Dovers employee
benefit plans, whether or not there is a termination of
employment, see the table on page 41.
|
Audit
Committee Report
The audit committee of Dovers board of directors consists
of five directors, all of whom are independent in accordance
with the NYSE Listing Standards, the rules of the SEC applicable
to audit committee members and the Dover Independence Standards.
The board of directors has adopted a written charter for the
audit committee, a copy of which may be found at Dovers
website at www.dovercorporation.com. The audit committee
is responsible for the duties set forth in its charter but is
not responsible for preparing the financial statements,
implementing or assessing internal controls or auditing the
financial statements. Dovers management is responsible for
preparing the financial statements, maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and assessing the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Dovers independent registered public accounting firm,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (auditors), is
responsible for auditing the financial statements and expressing
opinions on managements assessment and on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The
review of the financial statements by the audit committee is not
the equivalent of an audit.
In accordance with the requirements of the Sarbox Act, the
related SEC rules and the NYSE Listing Standards, the audit
committee engaged the auditors to audit the annual accounts of
Dover and its subsidiaries for 2006. Pursuant to its oversight
responsibilities, the audit committee discussed with the
auditors the overall scope and plans for the audit of
Dovers 2006 financial statements. The audit committee met
with the auditors, with and without Dover management present, to
discuss the results of the auditors examination, their
assessment of Dovers internal controls and the overall
quality of Dovers financial reporting.
The audit committee reviewed and discussed, with both the
management of Dover and the auditors, the fiscal year 2006
audited financial statements, including a discussion of critical
accounting policies, the quality, not just the acceptability, of
the accounting principles followed, the reasonableness of
significant judgments reflected in such financial statements and
the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
43
The audit committee also (1) discussed with the auditors
the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61, and (2) reviewed the written
disclosures and the letter from the auditors required by
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, and discussed
with the auditors any relationships or permitted non-auditing
services, including those described below under
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm, that might impact their objectivity and independence.
The audit committee reviewed and had input on each of the four
quarterly earnings releases related to 2006 financial
information. The chair of the audit committee also participated
on behalf of the committee in five meetings of Dovers
DC&P committee, one before each of the four quarterly
earnings releases and one before the filing of Dovers
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for 2006. In addition, the audit committee held eight meetings
in which it reviewed 2006 financial information. Four of these
meetings were held in connection with the Dover boards
regular quarterly meetings. The other four were held to review
Dovers Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for each of the first three quarters and Dovers Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the full year just prior to their filing with the SEC.
Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the
audit committee recommended that the audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 be included
in Dovers Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
Audit Committee: |
Michael B. Stubbs (Chair)
|
David H. Benson
James L. Koley
Bernard G. Rethore
Mary A. Winston
Relationship
with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
As discussed above, the independent registered public accounting
firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is the independent registered
public accounting firm selected by the audit committee to audit
the annual accounts of Dover and its subsidiaries for 2006. This
firm also audited the financial statements for 2005 and 2004.
Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will not be
present at the Meeting.
Fees
Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
A. Audit
Fees
Audit fees include fees for audit or review services in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and fees
for services that generally only Dovers auditors provide,
such as statutory audits and review of documents filed with the
SEC. Audit fees also include fees paid in connection with
services required for compliance with Section 404 of the
Sarbox Act. The aggregate fees, rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars, paid to, or accrued for, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for
consolidated auditing services to Dover for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were
$10,327,000 and $9,700,000, respectively.
Audit-related fees include fees for assurance and related
services that are traditionally performed by Dovers
auditors. These services include audits of employee benefit
plans, due diligence on acquisition targets and consultations in
connection with financial and accounting standards. The
aggregate fees, rounded to the nearest thousand dollars, paid
to, or accrued for, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit-related
services to Dover for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 were $51,000 and $200,000, respectively.
44
Tax fees include fees for services that are performed by
professional tax staff other than in connection with the audit.
These services include tax compliance services, tax planning and
tax advice. The aggregate fees, rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars, paid to, or accrued for, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for
tax services to Dover for the years ended December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005 were $1,065,000 and $800,000,
respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, the aggregate fees, rounded to the
nearest thousand dollars, paid to, or accrued for,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for all other services were $0 and
$0, respectively.
Pre-Approval
of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Consistent with its charter and applicable SEC rules, the audit
committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit
services provided by the auditors to Dover and its subsidiaries.
With respect to certain services which Dovers auditors
have traditionally provided, the audit committee has adopted
specific pre-approval policies and procedures. In developing
these policies and procedures, the audit committee considered
the need to ensure the independence of Dovers auditors
while recognizing that, in certain situations, Dovers
auditors may possess the expertise and be in the best position
to advise Dover on issues and matters other than accounting and
auditing.
The policies and procedures adopted by the audit committee allow
the pre-approval by the audit committee of permissible
audit-related services, non-audit-related services and tax
services. Under the policies and procedures, pre-approval is
generally provided for up to one year and any general
pre-approval is detailed as to the particular services or
category of services and is subject to a specific budget for
each of them. The policies and procedures require that any other
services be expressly and separately approved by the audit
committee prior to such services being performed by the
auditors. In addition, pre-approved services which it is known
will exceed the budgeted amount included in a general
pre-approval require separate, specific pre-approval. For each
proposed service, the auditor and management are required to
provide detailed information at the time of approval. The audit
committee considers whether each pre-approved service is
consistent with the SECs rules and regulations on auditor
independence.
All audit-related and non-audit-related services of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2006 listed above under
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm were pre-approved specifically or pursuant to the
procedures outlined above.
2. STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSAL
The Company has been notified by Walden Asset Management, 1
Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108, and certain other stockholders
that they intend to present the following proposal for
consideration at the Annual Meeting. Dover will provide to any
stockholder upon request the names, addresses and number of
shares held by each proponent. The Board of Directors
unanimously recommends a vote against this proposal for the
reasons stated after the proposal.
SUSTAINABILITY
REPORT RESOLUTION
Whereas:
Investors increasingly seek disclosure of companies social
and environmental practices in the belief that they impact
shareholder value. Many investors believe companies that are
good employers, environmental stewards, and corporate citizens
are more likely to generate incremental
45
financial returns, be more stable in turbulent economic and
political conditions, and enjoy long-term business success.
Mainstream financial companies are seeking tools to understand
the links between sustainability performance and capital
markets. According to research consultant Innovest, major
investment firms including
ABN-AMRO,
Schroders, T. Rowe Price, and Legg Mason subscribe to
information on companies social and environmental
practices to help make investment decisions.
Sustainability refers to endeavors that meet present needs
without impairing the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs. It includes encouraging long lasting
social well being in communities where [companies] operate,
interacting with different stakeholders (e.g. clients,
suppliers, employees, government, local communities, and
non-governmental organizations), and responding to their
specific and evolving needs, thereby securing a long-term
license to operate, superior customer and employee
loyalty, and ultimately superior financial returns. (Dow
Jones Sustainability Group).
Globally, approximately 1,500 companies produce reports on
sustainability issues (Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants, www.corporateregister.com), including more than
half of the global Fortune 500 (KPMG International Survey of
Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005).
Dover competes internationally, and global expectations
regarding sustainability reporting are increasing. The European
Commission recommends corporate sustainability reporting, and
listed companies in Australia, South Africa and France are
required to provide investors with information on their social
and environmental performance.
Companies increasingly recognize that transparency and dialogue
about sustainability are elements of business success. For
example, Unilevers Chairman stated in a 2003 speech,
So when we talk about corporate social responsibility, we
dont see it as something business does to
society but as something that is fundamental to everything we
do. Not just philanthropy or community investment, important
though that is, but the impact of our operations and products as
well as the interaction we have with the societies we
serve.
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue
a sustainability report to shareholders, at reasonable cost, and
omitting proprietary information, by September 1, 2007.
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
The report should include the companys definition of
sustainability, as well as a company-wide review of company
policies, practices, and metrics related to long-term social and
environmental sustainability.
We recommend that Dover use the Global Reporting
Initiatives Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (The
Guidelines) to prepare the report. The Global Reporting
Initiative (www.globalreporting.org) is an international
organization developed with representatives from the business,
environmental, human rights and labor communities. The
Guidelines provide guidance on report content, including
performance on direct economic impacts, environmental, labor
practices and decent work conditions, human rights, society, and
product responsibility. The Guidelines provide a flexible
reporting system that allows the omission of content that is not
relevant to company operations. Over 800 companies use or
consult the Guidelines for sustainability reporting, including
3M, Tyco, General Electric, and United Technologies.
46
BOARD
RECOMMENDATION
The Board
of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal
for the following reasons:
Dover is fully committed to being a good corporate citizen and
believes that its policies and practices already address more
than adequately the concerns raised by the proposal.
Dovers commitment to conducting its businesses in
accordance with the highest ethical standards is reflected in
its Code of Business Conduct & Ethics, which sets forth
the standards that apply to all of Dovers officers,
directors and employees. It is also reflected in the actions of
Dovers companies, many of which have demonstrated
exemplary leadership on sustainability matters as they relate to
their businesses by developing more environmentally friendly
products, continuously improving their operations to minimize
their impact on the environment, implementing innovative product
safety features that go beyond legal requirements, donating
their time, financial resources, products and expertise to
address the needs of their communities and improve the quality
of life of urgent need populations around the world, and
facilitating and supporting volunteerism on the part of their
employees.
While Dover recognizes the importance of environmental and
social responsibility and sustainability, the Board of Directors
believes that there are some key considerations to be evaluated
in deciding whether a sustainability report makes sense for
Dover. First, the proposal calls for a company-wide
review of policies, practices and metrics related to
long-term environmental and social sustainability. The proposal
cites 3M, Tyco, General Electric and United Technologies. These
companies are many times the size of Dover. More importantly,
they operate in a highly centralized manner. Dover, on the other
hand, operates through more than 40 operating companies, some of
which have multiple divisions that constitute different
businesses. Together with their divisions, these
40 companies in fact represent over 100 separate and
distinct businesses located in more than 37 countries
around the world. These businesses provide tens of thousands of
tremendously diverse products and services at more than
200 locations. As a practical matter, it would be very
difficult to generate a comprehensive and meaningful report on a
company-wide basis. Each of Dovers businesses is
different; each operates autonomously within Dovers highly
decentralized management structure; and each has its own
management team, locations, products, workforce, support
functions, policies and practices. At Dover, there is no single
set of policies, practices and metrics that applies to or would
be appropriate for all of Dovers companies. For example,
the percentage of materials used that are recycled input
materials may be vastly different for a company making
supermarket refrigeration units than for a company making
miniature microphones for hearing aids. In short, Dovers
specific circumstances make it exceedingly difficult to generate
useful aggregate data on a Dover-wide basis.
Second, Dover has a very small corporate staff of well under 100
persons out of more than 33,000 employees. All of Dovers
businesses also operate on the basis of this highly lean staff
model. Any attempt to gather the data and prepare the report
called for by the proposal would require extensive use of
specialized consultants to gather data, perform analyses and
generate a comprehensive report.
Third, the proposal recommends that Dover prepare the report in
accordance with the Global Reporting Initiatives
Guidelines (GRI Guidelines) at a reasonable
cost. The GRI Guidelines are a lengthy, complex and
inherently vague set of requirements that require very extensive
and detailed scientific and technical analyses. Among the
scientific and technical information deemed central to a
sustainability report by the GRI Guidelines are data
compilations reflecting matters such as the percentage of
materials used that are recycled input materials; the total
amount of water withdrawn, by source of water; direct energy
consumption by primary energy source; indirect energy
consumption by primary source; the location and size of land
owned, leased, managed in or adjacent to protected areas and
areas of high biodiversity value; and many other such metrics.
The Guidelines also require extensive investigation of company
practices and policies with respect to a broad variety
47
of matters, including employment practices; practices relating
to human rights such as investment and procurement practices and
freedom of association and collective bargaining practices;
participation in public policy matters; products and service
labeling; customer satisfaction surveys; marketing
communications; and many other such categories.
While an undertaking of this sort by any large company would
require substantial funds, personnel time and the employment of
consultants with specialized expertise, Dovers highly
decentralized structure and the diversity of the companies it
owns greatly increase the time and cost that would be required
to produce such a report. Although Dover has not quantified
precisely the cost of such an extensive study, a conservative
estimate would suggest that Dover would have to spend several
million dollars to complete this project.
Dover believes that this would not be an effective or prudent
use of stockholder assets. Rather, the vast resources required
to accomplish this task would be better spent on extending and
enhancing Dover company sustainability initiatives than on
producing a detailed report about them. If the objective of the
report is to gather information that can then be applied to make
improvements in sustainability matters, then using stockholder
assets directly to further environmental and social initiatives
is a far more effective means of achieving that objective. The
following examples illustrate how some individual Dover
companies already are investing stockholder assets toward that
objective and incorporating sustainability concerns into their
business operations.
Hill PHOENIX, a leading manufacturer of commercial refrigeration
systems, is an industry leader in developing energy efficient
approaches to supermarket refrigeration, and was the first
United States manufacturer to develop supermarket cases that use
a primary refrigerant that does not produce greenhouse gases.
This technology, called Second
Nature®,
has enabled Hill PHOENIX customers to dramatically reduce their
output of fluorocarbons and other greenhouse gases. In addition,
Hill PHOENIX was the first in its industry to redesign
low-temperature cases to improve significantly their energy
efficiency.
Imaje, a leading manufacturer of coding and marking solutions,
was among the first marking and coding companies to be awarded
ISO 14001 international environmental certification. In
keeping with its leadership in such matters, it has chosen
voluntarily to comply with new European environmental
regulations with respect to products that are not covered by the
regulations and despite applicable exemptions under those
regulations.
OPW Fueling Components, the global leader in commercial and
retail fueling equipment, manufactures nozzles that collect
vapors emitted during the refueling of automobiles and return
them to gasoline storage tanks. The vapors that accumulate in
the tanks are separated into liquid gasoline and clean air using
membrane technology it developed called
Vaporsavertm
technology. This allows liquid gasoline to be recovered in the
tanks and only fresh air to be released into the atmosphere.
Absent this process, the gasoline vapors that accumulate in the
tanks would eventually seep out of the tanks, releasing
hydrocarbons into the environment.
Vectron International, a leader in the design, manufacture and
marketing of frequency generation and control products, has been
recognized for its conservation and recycling efforts. All of
Vectrons facilities are ISO 9001 certified and, in
some key locations, ISO 14001 certified. Vectrons
Hudson, New Hampshire, manufacturing facility was accepted into
the Environmental Protection Agencys National
Environmental Performance Track program due to its focus on
energy and material conservation and better utilization of
recycled materials.
Knowles, a manufacturer of technologically advanced products in
the hearing aid and acoustic markets, is a principal contributor
to the Starkey Hearing Foundation, a
not-for-profit
dedicated to improving hearing care awareness worldwide. Knowles
has supported this foundations donation of free hearing
aids to needy children and adults in the United States and other
parts of the world and participated in missions where children
are fitted for hearing aids. Knowles is also a principal
48
sponsor of the Better Hearing Institute, a
not-for-profit
dedicated to increasing public awareness of untreated hearing
loss.
These are just a few of the many examples throughout Dover where
operating companies are actively looking at sustainability as an
integral part of their business operations. The Board of
Directors recognizes the importance to stockholders of social
and environmental sustainability. However, it believes that the
significant financial and management resources that would be
required to conduct a special review of social, environmental
and economic issues at each of Dovers 40 companies
representing over 100 businesses at over 200 locations
and prepare a report for stockholders on these subjects would
not be an effective or prudent use of stockholder assets. The
Board of Directors believes that it is more important that the
companies resources be spent directly on sustainability
initiatives rather than on preparing a detailed report about
them.
THE BOARD
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE ADOPTION
OF THIS STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL.
3. MISCELLANEOUS
Other
Matters
Management does not know of any other business to be taken up at
the Meeting. If, however, any other business properly comes
before the Meeting or any adjournments thereof, the persons
named as proxies will vote the shares covered by a proxy in
accordance with their best judgment on such matters to the
extent permitted by, and in accordance with, applicable
corporate, securities and other laws.
Stockholder
Proposals for 2008 Annual Meeting
In order for stockholder proposals to be included in
Dovers proxy statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting, they
must be received by Dover at its principal executive offices,
280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017, by November 11, 2007.
All other stockholder proposals, including nominations for
directors, in order to be voted on at the 2008 Annual Meeting,
must be received by Dover not earlier than November 19,
2007, and not later than December 19, 2007, being,
respectively, 150 days and 120 days prior to the date
of the first anniversary of the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Dated: March 6, 2007
By authority of the board of
directors,
JOSEPH W. SCHMIDT
Secretary
49
DOVER CORPORATION
PROXY SOLICITED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ANNUAL MEETING, APRIL 17, 2007.
The undersigned hereby appoints Ronald L. Hoffman, Robert G. Kuhbach, Joseph W. Schmidt and
Ivonne M. Cabrera, or any of them, as the undersigneds proxy or proxies, with full power of
substitution, to vote all shares of Common Stock of Dover Corporation which the undersigned is
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in Wilmington, Delaware, on April
17, 2007 at 10:00 A.M., local time, and any adjournments thereof, as fully as the undersigned could
if personally present, upon the proposals set forth on the reverse side hereof, revoking any proxy
or proxies heretofore given. For participants in the Companys Retirement Savings Plan, this proxy
will govern the voting of stock held for the account of the undersigned in the Plan.
IMPORTANTYou have the option of voting your shares by returning the enclosed proxy card, voting
via internet or by using a toll-free telephone number. On the reverse side of this proxy card are
instructions on how to vote via the internet or by telephone. If you vote by either of these
methods your vote will be recorded as if you mailed in your proxy card. If you vote by returning
this proxy card, you must sign and date this proxy on the reverse side.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE ON THE REVERSE SIDE, BUT
IF NO CHOICES ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE,
AGAINST PROPOSAL 2 AND FOR PROPOSAL 3.
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY
|
|
DOVER CORPORATION
|
|
PROXY |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Item 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of Directors Nominees:
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold All |
|
|
(01) D. H. Benson, (02) R. W. Cremin,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(03) J-P. M. Ergas, (04) K. C. Graham, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(05) R. L. Hoffman, (06) J. L. Koley, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(07) R. K. Lochridge, (08) T. L. Reece, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(09) B. G. Rethore, (10) M. B. Stubbs, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) M. A. Winston. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For All Except Nominee(s) written below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please
Mark Here o
for Address
Change or
Comments
SEE REVERSE SIDE
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Item 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
A shareholder proposal regarding a
sustainability report.
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Item 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
To transact such other business as may
properly come before the meeting.
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear above. For joint accounts, each owner should sign.
When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, etc., please give your
full title.
4
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
VOTE BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE OR MAIL
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59PM Eastern Time the
day prior to the annual meeting day.
Your internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/dov
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site.
Telephone
1-866-540-5760
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.
Mail
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
If you vote your proxy by internet or telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy
card. To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope.