e424b1
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
Registration No. 333-140030
and 333-140465
20,000,000 Ordinary Shares
Cellcom Israel Ltd.
Ordinary Shares
This is an initial public offering of ordinary shares of Cellcom
Israel Ltd.
The selling shareholders identified in this prospectus are
offering 20,000,000 ordinary shares to be sold in the offering.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the offering.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
ordinary shares. The initial public offering price per ordinary
share is $20.00. We have been authorized to list our ordinary
shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
CEL.
See Risk Factors on page 10 to read about
factors you should consider before buying the ordinary
shares.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other
regulatory body, including any state securities regulators, has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the
accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Initial public offering price
|
|
$ |
20.00 |
|
|
$ |
400,000,000 |
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
26,000,000 |
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling shareholders
|
|
$ |
18.70 |
|
|
$ |
374,000,000 |
|
To the extent that the underwriters sell more than 20,000,000
ordinary shares, the underwriters have the option to purchase up
to an additional 3,000,000 ordinary shares from the selling
shareholders at the initial public offering price less the
underwriting discount.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in
New York, New York on February 9, 2007.
Bookrunners
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
Citigroup |
Deutsche Bank Securities |
Joint-Lead Manager
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Co-Managers
|
|
Jefferies & Company |
William Blair & Company |
February 5, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
ii |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
In this prospectus, Cellcom, the
Company, we, us and
our refer to Cellcom Israel Ltd. and its
subsidiaries. The terms NIS refers to new Israeli
shekel, and dollar, USD or $
refers to U.S. dollars.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus and in any free writing prospectus which we file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. We have not authorized
anyone to provide you with information different from that
contained in this prospectus or such free writing prospectus.
The selling shareholders are offering to sell, and seeking
offers to buy, ordinary shares only in jurisdictions where
offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in
this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this
prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this
prospectus or of any sale of the ordinary shares.
Until March 2, 2007, all dealers that effect transactions
in these securities, whether or not participating in this
offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in
addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus
when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in Israel, or
Israeli GAAP, and, unless otherwise indicated, all financial
data and discussions related to such data are based upon
financial statements prepared in accordance with Israeli GAAP.
The principal differences between the accounting principles
applied by us under Israeli GAAP and generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP,
are discussed in note 28 to our consolidated annual
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Unless we indicate otherwise, U.S. dollar translations of
the NIS amounts presented in this prospectus are translated
using the rate of NIS 4.302 to $1.00, the representative rate of
exchange as of September 30, 2006 as published by the Bank
of Israel.
TRADEMARKS
We have proprietary rights to trademarks used in this prospectus
which are important to our business. We have omitted the
®
and
tm
designations for certain trademarks, but nonetheless reserve all
rights to them. Each trademark, trade name or service mark of
any other company appearing in this prospectus belongs to its
respective holder.
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
This prospectus contains information about our market share,
market position and industry data. Unless otherwise indicated,
this statistical and other market information is based on
statistics prepared by the Ministry of Communications of Israel,
the Ministry of Finance of Israel, the Central Bureau of
Statistics of Israel, the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development, or OECD, and Pyramid Research.
Industry publications generally state that the information they
contain has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable,
but the accuracy and completeness of such information is not
guaranteed. We have not independently verified the accuracy of
market data and industry forecasts contained in this prospectus
that were taken or derived from these industry publications.
ii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the
information that you should consider before deciding to
invest in our ordinary shares. You should read this entire
prospectus carefully, including the
Risk Factors section and the consolidated
financial statements and the notes to those statements.
CELLCOM
General
We are the leading provider of cellular communications services
in Israel in terms of number of subscribers, revenues and EBITDA
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Upon
launch of our services in 1994, we offered significantly lower
prices for cellular communications services than the incumbent
provider and transformed the nature of cellular telephone usage
in Israel, turning it into a mass market consumption item. We
surpassed the incumbent cellular operator and became the market
leader in terms of number of subscribers in 1998 and, despite
the entry of two additional competitors, we have continued since
then to have the highest number of subscribers. As of
September 30, 2006, we provided services to approximately
2.83 million subscribers in Israel with an estimated market
share of 34.4%. Our closest competitors had market shares of
31.9% and 28.7%, respectively. In the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006, we generated revenues of NIS
4.2 billion ($974 million), EBITDA of NIS
1.4 billion ($322 million), and operating income of
NIS 762 million ($177 million). See note 3 to the
Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Data for a
definition of EBITDA. We incurred significant debt in late 2005
and early 2006, which has resulted in increased financial
expenses for us. Our long-term debt at September 30, 2006
was approximately NIS 3.3 billion ($767 million).
We offer a broad range of cellular services through our cellular
networks covering substantially all of the populated territory
of Israel. These services include basic and advanced cellular
telephone services, text and multimedia messaging services and
advanced cellular content and data services. We also offer
landline transmission and data services to business customers
and telecommunications operators and, since July 2006, we offer
landline telephony services to selected businesses.
Our History
We hold one of the four general licenses to provide cellular
telephone services in Israel. Our cellular license was granted
by the Ministry of Communications in 1994 and is valid until
2022.
Our principal founding shareholders were Discount Investment
Corporation Ltd., or DIC, a subsidiary of IDB Holding
Corporation Ltd., or IDB, which prior to September 2005
indirectly held approximately 25% of our share capital, and
BellSouth Corporation and the Safra brothers of Brazil, which
together indirectly held approximately 69.5% of our share
capital and voting rights in respect of an additional 5.5% of
our share capital. IDB acquired the stakes of BellSouth and the
Safra brothers in September 2005 and, following the sale of
minority stakes to four groups of investors in 2006, IDB
currently indirectly holds 78.5% of our share capital and voting
rights in respect of an additional 5.5% of our share capital.
Following the acquisition by IDB in 2005, IDB put in place a new
management team, including Ami Erel, the Chairman of our Board
of Directors, who had previously been President and CEO of
Bezeq The Israeli Telecommunications Corporation
Ltd., or Bezeq, the incumbent landline provider, Amos Shapira,
our Chief Executive Officer, who had been CEO of
Kimberly-Clarks Israeli subsidiary and El Al Airlines, and
Tal Raz, our Chief Financial Officer, one of the founders and
formerly a director of Partner Communications Ltd., or Partner,
one of our principal
1
competitors. Our new management team has already implemented a
series of initiatives to drive revenues. In addition, between
September 2005 and September 2006, while increasing the number
of positions in units that deal directly with our customers
(such as sales and service), which we call customer-facing
positions, our new management reduced our overall workforce by
over 2%, primarily through the elimination of over 16% of
positions in units that do not deal directly with our customers,
which we call non-customer facing positions. Contracts with our
main suppliers were also renegotiated to reduce costs. Our
management structure has also been rationalized by providing
customer-facing executives with a direct reporting line to our
CEO and through the merging of technology sub-units. Following
the implementation of these initiatives, our revenues and
operating income increased by approximately 9% and 24%,
respectively, and our general and administrative expenses
decreased by 5% in the first nine months of 2006 compared to the
first nine months of 2005.
Our new management also faces a number of challenges. We operate
in a highly regulated and competitive industry. Compliance with
the provisions of our licenses and applicable laws and
regulations governing our operation, as well as our need to
comply with possible future changes to our license and
applicable legislation, limits our freedom to conduct our
business and can adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition. We may face claims of being in violation of
regulatory requirements, including as to the implementation of
number portability. We also face intense competition. Further,
companies in our industry are exposed to a number of legal
claims, including class actions, and recent legislation has made
it easier to assert class actions. See Risk Factors.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths will enable
us to maintain and enhance our position as the leading provider
of cellular communications services in Israel:
|
|
|
|
|
Unique combination of leading market position and strong
operational momentum. In the last year, we have achieved
market-leading subscriber and revenue growth while steadily
strengthening our operating margins. |
|
|
|
Strong and distinctive own brand. Our established brand
enjoys strong recognition in Israel. Since 2004, we have made
the enhancement of our image among consumers a top priority and
have invested substantial resources to position Cellcom as a
local cellular company. |
|
|
|
Transmission infrastructure and landline services. We
have an advanced fiber-optic transmission infrastructure that
consists of approximately 1,300 kilometers of inland fiber-optic
cable, which, together with our complementary microwave-based
infrastructure, connects the majority of our cell sites and
provides for substantially all of our backhaul services. Our
transmission infrastructure significantly reduces our
operational reliance on Bezeq, the incumbent landline operator
in Israel, while also saving us substantial
infrastructure-leasing cash costs. |
|
|
|
Strategic relationship with a leading group of local and
international shareholders. Our ultimate parent company,
IDB, is one of the largest business groups in Israel. We enjoy
access, through our management services agreement, to the senior
management of the IDB group, who are some of the most
experienced managers in Israel. In 2006, our shareholder base
was broadened as a result of IDBs sale of minority stakes
to a series of highly regarded international and local financial
investors, including affiliates of Goldman Sachs, Bank Leumi,
Migdal Group and the First International Bank of Israel. |
|
|
|
Strong management team. Since IDB acquired control of us
in September 2005, we have put in place a team of seasoned
managers with significant experience and solid track records in
previous managerial positions. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
Strong cash flow generation. We have a proven track
record of strong financial performance and profitability with
cash operating margins that have been higher than those of our
principal competitors. This performance has allowed us to
distribute dividends to our shareholders. |
Notwithstanding our strengths, we face intense competition in
our industry from competitors with strong market shares, and our
results of operations may be adversely affected by measures that
we take to maintain our market share.
Business Strategy
Our goal is to strengthen our position as the leading cellular
provider in Israel. The principal elements of our business
strategy are:
|
|
|
|
|
Maximize customer satisfaction, retention and growth. Our
growth strategy is focused on retaining our subscribers and
expanding the selection of services and products we offer to our
subscribers in order to enhance customer satisfaction and
increase average revenues per user, or ARPU. In addition to
providing quality customer service, we also strive to retain our
subscribers and attract new subscribers by offering them
advanced handsets, handset upgrades, attractive calling plans
and value-added services. In 2006, we introduced a churn
lab that identifies subscribers at high risk of churn and
seeks to preemptively approach them with tailored solutions to
maintain their satisfaction with our services. |
|
|
|
Grow and develop our Internet, content and data services.
The usage of cellular content and data services in Israel is
currently relatively low compared to western European countries
and we believe that we have significant growth potential in this
field. We intend to continue to invest in the deployment of our
high speed UMTS/ HSDPA network, which covered 80% of the
populated territory of Israel at the end of 2006. We also plan
to expand our content and data services, products and
capabilities through in-house expertise and strategic
relationships with leading cellular content providers. |
|
|
|
Grow roaming revenues. We have experienced steady growth
in roaming revenues since 2003 and believe that roaming presents
an important source of future revenue and profit growth for us.
We currently have GSM roaming agreements with over 450 operators
in 167 countries, of which 45 operators in 27 countries are
also 3G operators, and we aim to increase our number of
relationships. |
|
|
|
Further develop and strengthen the Cellcom brand.
External market surveys that we have commissioned indicate that
brand recognition has become an increasingly important factor in
subscriber selection of, and loyalty to, a cellular operator.
Due to our extensive efforts in the past few years, we believe
that we have established the Cellcom brand as one of the most
recognized and respected consumer brands in Israel. We plan to
continually enhance our brand through maintaining our high
network quality, the provision of innovative products and
services, quality customer service and investments in
advertising and promotional campaigns. |
|
|
|
Optimize our cost structure. We intend to continue our
efforts to control costs so that we can improve profitability
while also improving the quality of our services. We intend to
continue to focus on identifying further opportunities to manage
our costs without reducing the quality of our service. |
|
|
|
Capitalize on our existing infrastructure to selectively
provide landline telephony services. Our
1,300 kilometer inland fiber-optic network and our
microwave infrastructure provide us with the ability to offer
cost-efficient landline telecommunications solutions. We hold a
license to operate a landline service in Israel and, since July
2006, we offer our landline telephony service to selected
businesses. |
3
However, as we operate in a highly regulated industry,
compliance with our licenses and applicable laws and regulations
may limit our freedom to conduct our business and implement our
strategies, and may thereby adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
Additional Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 10 Hagavish
Street, Netanya, Israel 42140 and our telephone number is
(972) 52-999-0052. Our website is www.cellcom.co.il.
Information in or connected to our website is not part of this
prospectus.
4
THE OFFERING
|
|
|
The offering |
|
20,000,000 ordinary shares offered by the selling
shareholders. |
|
Ordinary shares to be outstanding after this offering |
|
97,500,000 ordinary shares |
|
Over-allotment option |
|
The selling shareholders have granted the underwriters a
30-day option to
purchase up to 3,000,000 ordinary shares to cover over-
allotments. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the offering. |
|
Dividend policy |
|
Our Board of Directors has adopted a dividend policy to
distribute each year at least 75% of our annual net income,
subject to applicable law, our license and our contractual
obligations (which currently limit distribution of dividends)
and provided that such distribution would not be detrimental to
our cash needs or to any plans approved by our Board of
Directors. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of
Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time
and for any reason, not to pay dividends. See Dividend
Policy. We currently expect that the quarterly dividend we
will declare for the first quarter of 2007, which may be funded
out of a combination of net income, existing retained earnings
and/or a portion of the approximately NIS 280 million
of retained earnings described under Operating and
Financial Review and
Prospects Overview New Israeli
accounting standard affecting measurement of fixed assets,
will be NIS 1.4 per share. Any dividends must be declared
by our Board of Directors, which will take into account the
factors set out above. The amount of dividends per share we will
pay for the first quarter does not necessarily reflect dividends
that will be paid for future quarterly periods, which can change
at any time in accordance with the policy described under
Dividend Policy. |
|
New York Stock Exchange
symbol |
|
CEL |
Unless we specifically state otherwise, the information in this
prospectus:
does not take into account the sale of up to
3,000,000 ordinary shares which the underwriters have the option
to purchase from the selling shareholders to cover
over-allotments;
does not take into account the exercise of any
options to purchase ordinary shares, approximately
2.4 million of which are outstanding as of November 5,
2006 at an exercise price of $12.60 per share;
gives effect to a
10-for-1 share split
and a distribution of approximately 84.5 ordinary shares to all
shareholders for each outstanding ordinary share, both of which
were effected on October 12, 2006 in order to avoid the
need to issue fractional shares upon option exercise; and
assumes the amendment of our articles of
association upon the completion of this offering.
5
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
You should read the following summary consolidated financial
data in conjunction with the section of this prospectus entitled
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and our
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with Israeli GAAP. The summary information also includes certain
items in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Israeli GAAP differs in
certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a summary
of the principal differences, see note 28 to our
consolidated annual financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
consumer price index, or Israeli CPI. Accordingly, among other
things, non-monetary items (such as fixed assets) were adjusted
based on the changes in the Israeli CPI from the Israeli CPI
published for the month in which the transaction relating to the
asset took place up to the Israeli CPI at the date of the
balance sheet. Starting January 1, 2004, the adjustment of
financial statements for the impact of the changes in the
purchasing power of the Israeli currency was discontinued. The
adjusted amounts included in the financial statements as of
December 31, 2003 constitute the starting point for the
nominal financial report as of January 1, 2004. Any
additions made from January 1, 2004 are included at their
nominal values.
For your convenience, the following tables also contain
U.S. dollar translations of the NIS amounts presented as of
September 30, 2006, translated using the rate of NIS 4.302
to $1.00, the representative rate of exchange on
September 30, 2006, as published by the Bank of Israel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 (In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except per share data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Income tax
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per share
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
Dividends declared per share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
U.S. GAAP Income Statement Data(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 (In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except per share data) | |
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Subscribers (end of period)(4)
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Period churn rate(5)
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
ARPU (in NIS)(6)
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Average monthly usage per subscriber (in minutes of use, or
MOU)(7)
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
118 |
|
Working capital
|
|
|
180 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
184 |
|
U.S. GAAP Data(2):
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,085 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All dividends declared were paid in cash in the first nine
months of 2006. |
|
(2) |
Under U.S. GAAP, DICs acquisition of our shares in
2005 is treated as a purchase that requires a revaluation of our
assets and liabilities, leading to increased amortization
expense of intangible assets, offset by decreased depreciation
expense of tangible assets under U.S. GAAP. In addition, we
were required to push down certain DIC debt and the interest
expense relating to such debt incurred to finance the
acquisition until it was repaid in early 2006, leading to
increased financial expense under U.S. GAAP. See
note 28 to our consolidated financial statements. As a
result of this accounting treatment, U.S. GAAP data
presented for the year ended and as at December 31, 2005
and for the nine months ended and as at September 30, 2006
are not comparable with the data presented for the previous
periods. |
|
(3) |
EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as income before
financial income (expenses), net; other income (expenses), net;
income tax; depreciation and amortization. We present EBITDA as
a supplemental performance measure because we believe that it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out potential
differences caused by variations in capital structure (most
particularly affecting our interest expense given our recently
incurred significant debt), tax positions (such as the impact on
periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net
operating losses or, most recently, our provision for tax
expenses) and the age of, and depreciation expenses associated
with, fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense and,
until December 31, 2003, the effects of adjusting for
changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency
as discussed above). EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for operating income or other
statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance
with GAAP as a measure of our profitability or liquidity. EBITDA
does not take into account our debt service requirements and
other commitments, including capital expenditures, and,
accordingly, is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may
be available for discretionary uses. In addition, EBITDA, as
presented in this prospectus, may not be comparable to similarly
titled measures reported by other companies due to differences
in the way that these measures are calculated. |
7
The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Net income
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Financial expense (income), net
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Subscriber data refer to active subscribers. Until June 30,
2006, we had a three-month method of calculating our subscriber
base, which means that we deduct subscribers from our subscriber
base after three months of no revenue generation or activity on
our network by or in relation to both the post-paid and pre-paid
subscriber. We now believe that waiting six months to deduct
subscribers is preferable since many subscribers that were
inactive for three months become active again before the end of
six months. As a result, commencing July 1, 2006, we
adopted a six-month method of calculating our subscriber base,
but have not restated our prior subscriber data presented in
this table to reflect this change. The six-month method is, to
the best of our knowledge, consistent with the methodology used
by other cellular providers in Israel. This change in
methodology resulted in an increase of our number of reported
subscribers by approximately 80,000 compared to the prior
methodology and affected our other key performance indicators
accordingly. |
We also revised our subscriber calculation methodology in 2003
and 2005 but in each case have not restated prior subscriber
data to conform to the new presentation. We estimate that the
change in methodology in 2003 led to a decrease in our reported
subscriber numbers of approximately 300,000 and the change in
methodology in 2005 led to an increase in our reported
subscriber numbers of approximately 84,000.
|
|
(5) |
Churn rate is defined as the total number of voluntary and
involuntary permanent deactivations in a given period expressed
as a percentage of the number of subscribers at the beginning of
the period. Involuntary permanent deactivations relate to
subscribers who have failed to pay their arrears for the period
of six consecutive months. Voluntary permanent deactivations
relate to subscribers who terminated their use of our services. |
|
(6) |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) is calculated
by dividing revenues from cellular services for the period by
the average number of subscribers during the period and by
dividing the result by the number of months in the period.
Revenues from inbound roaming services are included even though
the number of subscribers in the equation does not include the
users of those roaming services. Inbound roaming services are
included because ARPU is meant to capture all service revenues
generated by a cellular network, including roaming services.
Revenues from sales of extended warranties are included because
they represent recurring revenues generated by subscribers, but
revenues from sales of handsets, repair services and
transmission services are not. We, and industry analysts, treat
ARPU as a key performance indicator of a cellular operator
because it is the closest meaningful measure of the contribution
to service revenues made by an average subscriber. |
We have set out below the calculation of ARPU for each of the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 (In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except number of subscribers and months) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
less revenues from equipment sales
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
less other revenues*
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
adjustments to the Israeli CPI**
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues used in ARPU calculation (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Average number of subscribers
|
|
|
2,477,316 |
|
|
|
2,368,919 |
|
|
|
2,489,453 |
|
|
|
2,467,596 |
|
|
|
2,675,807 |
|
|
|
2,675,807 |
|
Months during period
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
ARPU (in NIS, per month)
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Other revenues includes revenues from repair services and
transmission services. |
8
|
|
|
|
** |
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
CPI. We reverse these adjustments in presenting ARPU. |
If the methodology of calculating our subscriber base had not
changed in July 2006, ARPU for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 would have been NIS 154, which is equal
to ARPU for the corresponding period in 2005.
|
|
(7) |
Average monthly minutes of use per subscriber (MOU) is
calculated by dividing the total billable minutes (of outgoing
and incoming calls from other networks, excluding roaming usage)
during the month, by the average number of subscribers during
such month, and by dividing the sum of such results for all
months in the reported period by the number of months in the
period. If the methodology of calculating our subscriber base
had not changed in July 2006, MOU for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 would have been 339 minutes, which
represents an increase of 4.0% compared with the corresponding
period in 2005. |
9
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risks and all of
the other information set forth in this prospectus before
deciding to invest in our ordinary shares. If any of the
following risks actually occurs, our business, financial
condition or results of operations would be likely to suffer. In
such case, the trading price of our ordinary shares could
decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to our Business
|
|
|
We operate in a heavily regulated industry, which can harm
our results of operations. |
A substantial part of our operations is subject to the Israeli
Communications Law, 1982, the Israeli Wireless Telegraph
Ordinance (New Version), 1972, the regulations promulgated
thereunder and the license for the provision of cellular
services that we received from the Ministry of Communications in
accordance with the Communications Law. The interpretation and
implementation of the provisions of our general license, as well
as our other licenses, are not certain and disagreements have
arisen and may arise in the future between the Ministry of
Communications and us. The Communications Law and regulations
thereunder grant the Ministry of Communications extensive
regulatory and supervisory authority with regard to our
activities, as well as the authority to impose substantial
sanctions in the event of a breach of our licenses. In the event
that we materially violate the terms of our licenses, the
Ministry of Communications has the authority to revoke them.
Our general license is valid until February 2022. It may be
extended for additional six-year periods upon our request to the
Ministry of Communications and confirmation from the Ministry of
Communications that we have complied with the provisions of our
license and the applicable law, have continuously invested in
the improvement of our service and network and have demonstrated
the ability to do so in the future. Our other licenses are also
limited in time. However, our licenses may not be extended when
necessary, or, if extended, the extensions may be granted on
terms that are not favorable to us. In addition, the Ministry of
Communications may modify our licenses without our consent and
in a manner that could limit our freedom to conduct our business.
Further, our business and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected by new legislation and
decisions by our regulators that:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce tariffs, including interconnect and roaming tariffs,
limit our ability to vary charging units or otherwise intervene
in the pricing policies for our products and services; |
|
|
|
regulate the termination of predefined term agreements,
including requiring us to disconnect subscribers once the
initial term expires; |
|
|
|
impose new safety or health-related requirements; |
|
|
|
impose additional restrictions on the construction and operation
of cell sites; |
|
|
|
impose restrictions on the provision of content services; |
|
|
|
limit or otherwise intervene with the services or products that
we may sell; or |
|
|
|
set higher service standards. |
See Regulatory Matters Our Principal
License.
If we fail to compensate for lost revenues resulting from past
or future legislative or regulatory changes with alternative
sources of income, our results of operations may be materially
adversely affected.
10
|
|
|
We may face claims of being in violation of the law and
our license requiring the implementation of number portability
and the terms of our license governing the method of charging
for SMS messages. |
As a result of an amendment to the Communications Law in March
2005, cellular and landline telephone operators were required to
implement number portability by September 1, 2006. Number
portability would permit our subscribers to change to another
network operator without having to change their telephone
numbers. Despite efforts to introduce the requisite technology
and coordinate the transition to number portability by
September 1, 2006, currently none of the cellular or
landline operators has implemented number portability. We,
Pelephone Communications Ltd., or Pelephone, and Partner have
filed a petition with the Israeli High Court of Justice for the
issuance of an order to the Government of Israel and the
Ministry of Communications to show cause for their failure to
act immediately in order to initiate an amendment to the
Communications Law postponing the deadline for the
implementation of number portability. If a reasonable extension
to the deadline is not effected or other adequate relief is not
granted, we may be exposed to substantial sanctions and legal
claims, including class actions by subscribers. See
Business Legal Proceedings
Purported class actions for additional details on a
purported class action filed against us in that respect.
In 2005, our license was amended to regulate charging for SMS
messages sent outside our network, which, under one
interpretation of the amendment, may lead to claims of our not
being in compliance with our license. To date, we have fulfilled
the license requirements, even under this potential
interpretation, with respect to SMS messages sent to subscribers
of one other cellular operator. However, due to technological
difficulties which we and our competitors face and have not yet
been resolved, we may face claims, if such interpretation of the
amendment prevails, of not having implemented the amendment with
respect to SMS messages sent to subscribers of two other
operators. We had notified the Ministry of Communications of our
technological inability to fully implement the amendment, if it
is so interpreted. The Ministry of Communications had proposed
an amendment to our license to resolve this problem, which we
believe is unsatisfactory because it does not change the
charging criteria but mainly proposes certain customer
notification requirements. Until such time as the cellular
operators develop the necessary interfaces or our license is
amended, we may be exposed, if such an interpretation prevails,
to substantial sanctions and legal claims.
|
|
|
We may not be able to obtain permits to construct and
operate cell sites. |
We depend on our network of cell sites to maintain and enhance
network coverage for our subscribers. In addition, where
necessary, we provide certain subscribers with bi-directional
amplifiers, also known as repeaters, to remedy weak
signal reception in indoor locations. Some of these repeaters
are located outdoors on rooftops. We also deploy and operate
microwave sites as part of our transmission network. The
construction and operation of these various facilities are
highly regulated and require us to obtain various consents and
permits. See Regulatory Matters Permits for
Cell Site Construction.
We have experienced difficulties in obtaining some of these
consents and permits, particularly in obtaining building permits
for cell sites from local planning and building authorities. As
of September 30, 2006, we operated approximately 10.5% of
our cell sites without building permits or applicable
exemptions. Although, in relation to approximately 6.5% of our
cell sites we are in the process of seeking to obtain building
permits or to modify them to satisfy applicable exemptions, we
may not be able to obtain all the necessary permits or make the
necessary modifications. Approximately 23% of our cell sites
operate without building permits in reliance on an exemption
from the requirement to obtain a building permit, mainly for
radio access devices. Our reliance upon the exemption for radio
access devices has been unsuccessfully challenged by local
planning and building authorities in the courts. However, such
challenges, and other claims asserting that those cell sites do
not meet other legal requirements continue. In addition, we
11
operate other cell sites in a manner that is not fully
compatible with the building permits issued for these cell sites
which may, in some cases, constitute grounds for termination of
their lease agreements or claims for breach of such agreements.
Our rooftop microwave sites and repeaters operate in reliance
upon an exemption from the requirement to obtain a building
permit. Substantially all of our outdoor microwave sites are
rooftops. It is unclear whether other types of repeaters require
a building permit. Our reliance on an exemption from the
requirement to obtain building permits for the microwave sites
and repeaters has not, to date, been subject to judicial
challenge. Operation of a cell site or other facility without a
building permit or not in accordance with other legal
requirements may result in the issuance of a demolition order
for the cell site or other facility or the bringing of criminal
charges against us and our officers and directors. Certain of
our cell sites have been subject to demolition orders. In
addition, criminal charges have been brought against us and our
officers and directors in connection with cell sites that were
alleged to have been constructed without the required permits.
Currently 27 cell sites are the subject of criminal proceedings;
demolition orders have been granted with respect to eight cell
sites while the remaining 19 cell sites are the subject of
further litigation. Certain of our officers and directors are
also named in a number of these criminal proceedings as
defendants. Should any of our officers or directors be found
guilty of an offence, although this has not occurred to date,
they may face monetary penalties and a term of imprisonment. Our
sites may be the subject of further demolition orders and we or
our officers and directors may face further criminal charges.
Pursuant to the Israeli Non-Ionizing Radiation Law, 2006, which
is effective, for the most part, as of January 1, 2007, the
granting or renewal of an operating permit by the Ministry of
Environmental Protection for a cell site or other facility is
subject to the receipt of a building permit or the facility
being exempt from the requirement to obtain a building permit.
Should we fail to obtain building permits for our cell sites or
other facilities, including in the event that our reliance upon
an exemption from the requirement to obtain building permits for
these cell sites and other facilities is found invalid, the
Ministry of Environmental Protection will not grant or renew our
operating permits for those cell sites and other facilities.
Operating a cell site or a facility without an operating permit
could subject us and our officers and directors to criminal,
administrative and civil liability.
The draft Non-Ionizing Radiation Regulations published by the
Ministry of Environmental Protection in November 2006 propose
additional restrictions in relation to the operation of cell
sites and other facilities. If these restrictions are adopted in
their current draft format, they will, among other things, limit
our ability to construct new sites and renew operating permits
for a number of our existing sites, specifically in residential
areas.
If we are unable to obtain or renew building or other consents
and permits for our existing sites or other facilities, we will
be required to demolish or relocate these cell sites and
facilities. Our inability to relocate cell sites or other
facilities in a timely manner could adversely affect our
existing network resulting in the loss of subscribers, prevent
us from meeting the network coverage and quality requirements
contained in our license and adversely impact our network
build-out, all of which may have a material adverse result on
our results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
We may be required to indemnify certain local planning and
building committees in respect of claims against them. |
Under the Israeli Planning and Building Law, 1965, by approving
a building plan, local planning and building committees may be
held liable to compensate for depreciation of properties
included in or neighboring the approved plan.
In January 2006, the law was amended to require an applicant, as
a precondition to obtaining a cell site construction permit from
a planning and building committee, to provide a letter to the
committee indemnifying it for possible depreciation claims. To
date, we have
12
provided over 35 indemnification letters to local planning and
building committees. Calls upon our indemnities may have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations. Further, if we are required to make substantial
payments under the indemnity letters, it could trigger a default
under our credit facility. We may also decide to demolish or
relocate existing cell sites to less favorable alternatives and
to construct new cell sites in alternative, less suitable
locations or not at all, due to the obligation to provide
indemnification. As a result, our existing service may be
impaired or the expansion of our network coverage could be
limited.
In addition, local planning and building committees have sought
to join cellular operators, including us, as defendants in
depreciation claims made against them even though
indemnification letters were not provided. We were joined as
defendants in a small number of cases. It is possible that the
joining of cellular operators to similar claims will continue
despite the absence of an indemnification letter. This practice
increases the risk that we may be exposed to material liability
as a result of depreciation claims.
Finally, should the Israeli Planning and Building Law, 1965 be
construed or amended to allow a longer period of limitation for
depreciation claims than the current limitation period of three
years from approval of the building plan, our potential exposure
to depreciation claims would increase.
|
|
|
Alleged health risks relating to non-ionizing radiation
generated from cell sites and cellular telecommunications
devices may harm our prospects. |
Handsets, accessories and various types of cell sites are known
to be sources of non-ionizing radiation emissions. While, to the
best of our knowledge, the handsets that we market comply with
the applicable legislation that relate to acceptable
specific absorption rate, or SAR, levels, we rely on
the SAR levels published by the manufacturers of these handsets
and do not perform independent inspections of the SAR levels of
these handsets. As the manufacturers approvals refer to a
prototype handset, we have no information as to the actual level
of SAR of the handsets throughout the lifecycle of the handsets,
including in the case of handset repair. See Regulatory
Matters Handsets. Concerns regarding cell
sites have already caused us difficulties in obtaining or
renewing leases for cell sites. If health concerns over
non-ionizing radiation increase, any adverse findings in new
studies of non-ionizing radiation are published or if
non-ionizing radiation levels are found to be higher than the
standards set for handsets and cell sites, consumers may be
discouraged from using cellular handsets and regulators may
impose additional restrictions on the construction and operation
of cell sites or handset usage. See the discussion of the draft
Non-Ionizing Radiation Regulations above in We may not be
able to obtain permits to construct and operate cell
sites. As a result, we may experience increased difficulty
in obtaining leases for new cell site locations or renewing
leases for existing locations (although, in total we have
experienced renewal problems with less than 5% of our cell site
leases each year); we may be exposed to property depreciation
claims; we may lose revenues due to decreasing usage of our
services; we may be subject to increased regulatory costs; and
we may be subject to health-related claims for substantial sums.
We have not obtained insurance for these potential claims. An
adverse outcome to, or settlement of, any litigation against us
or any other provider of cellular services could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
or prospects.
|
|
|
We face intense competition in all aspects of our
business. |
The Israeli cellular telephone market is highly competitive. We
compete for subscribers with three other cellular operators.
While we enjoy the largest market share, estimated to be 34.4%
as of September 30, 2006, two of our competitors, Partner
and Pelephone, enjoy estimated market shares of 31.9% and 28.7%
respectively, with MIRS Motorola Communications Ltd., or MIRS,
estimated to have a market share of 5%. The current competitive
pressure in the Israeli market results primarily from the highly
penetrated state of the market. See The Telecommunications
13
Industry in Israel. This means that market growth is
limited and cellular operators compete intensely to retain their
own subscribers and attract those of their competitors.
Any of the following developments in our market is expected to
increase competition further and may result in a loss of
subscribers, increased subscriber acquisition and retention
costs and ultimately reduced profitability for us:
|
|
|
|
|
the implementation of number portability, as it would eliminate
one of the deterrents to switching between cellular operators; |
|
|
|
Pelephones offering of certain services jointly with its
parent company, Bezeq, the incumbent landline operator; although
Bezeq and Pelephone may not offer integrated or combined
packages of cellular and landline telephone and other
telecommunication services currently, the Ministry of
Communications has stated that once Bezeqs share of the
Israeli landline telephone market falls below 85% (Bezeq does
not publish its market share), it would be permitted to offer
certain services jointly with its subsidiaries subject to
regulatory limitations; |
|
|
|
the entry into the Israeli cellular market by mobile virtual
network operators, or MVNOs, could increase competition and thus
may adversely affect our revenues; the government has authorized
an examination of the desirability of introducing MVNO operation
in Israel; the findings and recommendations are expected to be
published in May 2007; and |
|
|
|
a proposed amendment to the Israeli Restrictive Trade Practices
Law, 1988 to grant the Commissioner of Restrictive Trade
Practices broader authority to take action against oligopolies
where there is insufficient competition, including the authority
to issue orders to remove or to ease entry or transfer barriers,
should the Commissioner conclude that this would increase
competition; if the Commissioner were to decide that the Israeli
cellular market was oligopolistic and insufficiently
competitive, this could limit our freedom to manage our
business, increase the competitive pressures that we face and
adversely affect our results of operations. |
|
|
|
We could be subject to legal claims due to the inability
of our information systems to fully support our calling
plans. |
In order to attract and retain the maximum number of subscribers
in our highly competitive market, we design specific calling
plans to suit the preferences of various subscriber groups. We
require sophisticated information systems to record accurately
subscriber usage pursuant to the particular terms of each
subscribers plan as well as accurate database management
and operation of a very large number of calling plans. From time
to time, we have detected some discrepancies between certain
calling plans and the information processed by our internal
information systems, such as applying an incorrect rebate or
applying an incorrect tariff to a service resulting in a higher
charge. We have invested substantial resources to refine and
improve our information and control systems and ensure that our
new calling plans are appropriately processed by our information
systems; we have also taken steps to remedy the identified
discrepancies and have established reserves where the
discrepancies are quantifiable. Despite our substantial
investments, we may experience discrepancies in the future due
to the multiplicity of our plans and the scope of the processing
tasks. Further, while we invest substantial efforts in
monitoring our employees and third-party distributors and
dealers that market our services, it is possible that some of
our employees, distributors or dealers may offer terms and make
(or fail to make) representations to existing and prospective
subscribers that do not fully conform to applicable law, our
license or the terms of our calling plans. As a result of these
discrepancies, we may be subject to subscribers claims,
including class action claims, and substantial sanctions for
breach of our license that may materially adversely affect our
results of operations.
14
|
|
|
We are exposed to, and currently are engaged in, a variety
of legal proceedings, including class action lawsuits. |
We provide services to millions of subscribers on a daily basis.
As a result of the scope and magnitude of our operations we are
subject to the risk of a large number of lawsuits, including
class action suits by consumers with respect to billing and
other practices. These actions may be costly to defend and could
result in significant judgments against us. The Israeli
Class Actions Law, 2006 and the 2005 amendment to the
Israeli Consumer Protection Law, 1981 include provisions that
expand the causes of action for which a class of litigants may
bring suit, including with regard to any damages allegedly
incurred prior to the effective date of these laws, reducing the
minimal requirements for certification of a class action lawsuit
and reducing the qualifications required to be a lead plaintiff
in a class action lawsuit. These laws may increase the number of
requests for approval of class actions against us, our legal
exposure and our legal costs in defending against such suits,
which as a result may materially and adversely affect our
financial results. Currently, we are engaged in a number of
purported class action suits as a defendant, some of which are
for substantial amounts. For a summary of certain material legal
proceedings, see Business Legal
Proceedings.
We are subject to the risk of intellectual property rights
claims against us, including in relation to innovations we
develop ourselves. These claims may require us to initiate or
defend protracted and costly litigation, regardless of the
merits of these claims. If any of these claims succeed, we may
be forced to pay damages or may be required to obtain licenses
for the infringing product or service. If we cannot obtain all
necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, we may be
forced to stop using or selling the products and services, which
could adversely affect our ability to provide certain services
and products.
|
|
|
We may be subject to increased regulation in respect of
handset sales. |
The Ministry of Communications is considering adopting changes
to the licenses of the cellular operators that would prohibit
cellular operators from offering calling plans that include
handset subsidies to subscribers who purchase their handsets
from the operators, unless the same terms are also offered to
subscribers who purchase their handsets elsewhere. If such
proposed changes are adopted, this would impair our ability to
offer handsets to our subscribers at subsidized prices or in
conjunction with attractive calling plans. This may lead to
difficulties in selling advanced handsets that have the
potential to generate high content-related revenues, which in
turn may reduce our potential revenues or require higher
subscriber acquisition costs and adversely affect our results of
operations.
|
|
|
We rely on interconnecting telecommunications providers
and could be adversely affected if these providers fail to
provide these services without disruption and on a consistent
basis. |
Our ability to provide commercially viable cellular telephone
services depends upon our ability to interconnect with the
telecommunications networks of landline, cellular telephone and
international operators in Israel in order to complete calls
between our subscribers and parties on a landline or other
cellular telephone network, as well as third parties abroad. All
landline, cellular telephone and international operators in
Israel are required to provide interconnection to, and not to
discriminate against, any other licensed telecommunications
operator in Israel. We have no control over the quality and
timing of the investment and maintenance activities that are
necessary for these entities to provide us with interconnection
to their respective telecommunications networks. The failure of
these or other telecommunications providers to provide reliable
interconnections to us on a consistent basis could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
15
|
|
|
There are certain restrictions in our license relating to
the ownership of our shares. |
Our license restricts ownership of our ordinary shares and who
can serve as our directors as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
our founding shareholder, DIC (or its transferee or transferees,
if approved in advance by the Ministry of Communications as
founding shareholders), must own at least 26% of
each of our means of control; |
|
|
|
Israeli citizens and residents among our founding shareholders
(or their approved transferees) must own at least 20% of our
outstanding share capital and each of our other means of control
(DIC has agreed to comply with this requirement); |
|
|
|
a majority of our directors must be Israeli citizens and
residents; |
|
|
|
at least 20% of our directors must be appointed by Israeli
citizens and residents among our founding shareholders; and |
|
|
|
we are required to have a committee of our Board of Directors
that deals with matters relating to state security, which must
be comprised of at least four directors (including an external
director) having the requisite security clearance by
Israels General Security Service. |
If these requirements are not complied with, we could be found
to be in breach of our license and our license could be changed,
suspended or revoked.
In addition, our license provides that, without the approval of
the Ministry of Communications, no person may acquire or dispose
of shares representing 10% or more of our outstanding share
capital. Further, our directors and officers and any holder of
ordinary shares representing 5% or more of our outstanding share
capital may not own 5% or more of Bezeq or any of our
competitors or serve as a director or officer of such a company,
subject to certain exceptions which require the prior approval
of the Ministry of Communications.
To ensure that an unauthorized acquisition of our shares would
not jeopardize our license, our articles of association provide
that any shares acquired without approval required under our
license will not be entitled to voting rights.
If our service is to be determined by the Israeli Government to
be an essential service, the Prime Minister and the
Ministry of Communications could impose additional limitations
including a heightened requirement of Israeli ownership of our
ordinary shares.
Although our articles of association contain certain provisions
that are aimed at reducing the risk that holdings or transfers
of our ordinary shares will contravene our license, we cannot
entirely control these and other matters required by our
license, the violation of which could be a basis for suspending
or revoking our license. See Regulatory
Matters Our Principal License.
|
|
|
We may be adversely affected by the significant
technological and other changes in the cellular communications
industry. |
The cellular market is known for rapid and significant
technological change. Our current technologies, including our
3.5G technologies, may be overtaken rapidly, requiring us to
invest in alternative technologies to remain competitive.
Further, technologies such as satellite-based personal
communications services, wireless broadband access services such
as WiMAX, and other technologies that have the capacity to
handle cellular calls may enter our market and compete with
traditional cellular providers, thus further intensifying the
competition we face requiring us to reduce prices, thus
adversely affecting our results of operations.
16
|
|
|
If we cannot obtain or maintain favorable roaming
arrangements our services may be less attractive or less
profitable. |
We rely on agreements to provide roaming capability to our
subscribers in many areas outside Israel. As of
September 30, 2006, we had roaming arrangements with over
450 cellular providers in 167 countries around the world.
However, as we cannot control the quality of the service that
they provide, it may be inferior to the quality of service that
we provide. Equally, our subscribers may not be able to use some
of the advanced features that they enjoy when making calls on
our network. Some of our competitors may be able to obtain lower
roaming rates than we do because they may have larger call
volumes or because of their affiliations with other
international cellular operators. If our competitors
providers can deliver a higher quality or a more cost effective
roaming service, then subscribers may migrate to those
competitors and our results of operation could be adversely
affected. Further, we may not be able to compel providers to
participate in our technology migration and enhancement
strategies. As a result, our ability to implement technological
innovations could be adversely affected if these overseas
providers are unable or unwilling to cooperate with the further
development of our network or if they cease to provide services
comparable to those we offer on our network.
In addition, in 2006, the European Union declared that it is
considering regulating roaming tariffs. To our knowledge,
following such declaration, several operators in Europe agreed
to reduce roaming tariffs among themselves. Should such
operators decide to reduce roaming tariffs with us as well, this
could reduce the revenues we derive from our roaming services
and adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our substantial debt increases our exposure to market
risks, may limit our ability to incur additional debt that may
be necessary to fund our operations and could adversely affect
our financial stability. |
As of September 30, 2006, our total indebtedness was
approximately NIS 3,588 million ($834 million). Our
credit facility and the indentures governing our debentures
currently permit us to incur additional indebtedness, subject to
maintaining certain financial ratios and other restrictions
contained in our credit facility. Our substantial debt could
adversely affect our financial condition by, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or
business conditions, including increases in prevailing interest
rates, particularly because our debentures are linked to the
Israeli CPI, and our credit facility bears interest at a
variable rate; |
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
changes in our industry and the economy in general; |
|
|
|
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to service our debt, thus reducing the funds
available for operations and future business
development; and |
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to operate,
develop and expand our business. |
|
|
|
Our freedom to operate our business is limited as a result
of certain restrictive covenants contained in our credit
facility and our indentures. |
Our credit facility contains a number of restrictive covenants
that limit our operating and financial flexibility. These
covenants include, among other things, limitations on liens
(also contained in the indentures governing our debentures), on
the incurrence of indebtedness, on the provision of loans and
guarantees and on acquisitions, dispositions of assets, mergers
and other changes of control. Our credit facility also contains
covenants regarding maintaining certain levels of financial
ratios during the term of the facility, including as a condition
to the distribution
17
of dividends. Our ability to continue to comply with these and
other obligations depends in part on the future performance of
our business. Such obligations may hinder our ability to finance
our future operations or the manner in which we operate our
business. In particular, any non-compliance with
performance-related covenants and other undertakings of our
credit facility and debentures could result in an acceleration
of our outstanding debt under our credit facility and debentures
and restrict our ability to obtain additional funds, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations. Further, our inability to
maintain the financial ratios required under our credit facility
for the distribution of dividends may limit our ability to
distribute dividends.
|
|
|
Our business results may be affected by currency
fluctuations, by our currency hedging positions and by changes
in the Israeli Consumer Price Index. |
A substantial amount of our cash payments are incurred in, or
linked to, non-NIS currencies. In particular, in 2005 and the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, payments in
U.S. dollars or linked to the U.S. dollar represented
approximately 19% and 27%, respectively, of total cash outflow.
These payments included capital expenditures, cell site rental
fees, payments to equipment suppliers and, in 2006, payments of
principal and interest on our credit facility. As almost all of
our cash receipts are in NIS, any devaluation of the NIS against
those non-NIS currencies in which we make payments, particularly
the U.S. dollar, will increase the NIS cost of our non-NIS
denominated or linked expenses and capital expenditures.
We engage in currency hedging transactions to reduce the impact
on our cash flows and results of operations of these currency
fluctuations. We recognize freestanding derivative financial
instruments as either assets or liabilities in our balance sheet
and we measure those instruments at fair value. However,
accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument, such as a currency hedging instrument, depends on
the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting
designation. For a foreign exchange derivative instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the
derivative instrument is initially reported as a component of
our shareholders equity and subsequently recognized in our
income statement as the hedged item affects earnings. For
derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow
hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in our income
statement without any reference to the change in value of the
related budgeted expenditures. These differences could result in
fluctuations in our reported net income on a quarterly basis.
Further, since the principal amount of, and interest that we pay
on, our debentures are linked to the Israeli CPI, any increase
in the Israeli CPI will increase our financial expenses and
could adversely affect our results of operations.
|
|
|
We may not be able to fulfill our dividend policy in the
future. |
In February 2006, we adopted a dividend policy targeting a
payout ratio of at least 75% of our net income under Israeli
GAAP in each calendar year, subject to any applicable law, our
license and contractual obligations and provided that such
distribution would not be detrimental to our cash needs or to
any plans approved by our Board of Directors. Our credit
facility limits our ability to pay dividends, including by
limiting our distribution of dividends in respect of any
financial year so that any distributions based on retained
earnings accumulated since January 1, 2006, do not exceed
the lesser of (a) 75% of our aggregate net income from
January 1, 2006 to the date of distribution and
(b) the aggregate eligible dividend amount from
January 1, 2006 to the date of distribution, the
eligible dividend amount being the lesser of
(i) our net income for each financial year and
(ii) the excess of free cash flow over 110% of total debt
service for each financial year. In addition, we are also
permitted to make distributions out of the expected
approximately NIS 280 million ($65.1 million)
adjustment to retained earnings referred to below in
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Overview New Israeli accounting standard affecting
measurement of fixed assets. Our license requires that we
and our 10%
18
shareholders maintain at least $200 million of combined
shareholders equity. See Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects Liquidity and Capital
Resources Debt service. Dividend payments are
not guaranteed and our Board of Directors may decide, in its
absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to pay
dividends.
Further, our dividend policy, to the extent implemented, will
significantly restrict our cash reserves and may adversely
affect our ability to fund unexpected capital expenditures as
well as our ability to make interest and principal repayments on
our debentures and term loan. As a result, we may be required to
borrow additional money or raise capital by issuing equity
securities, which may not be possible on attractive terms or at
all.
If we are unable to fulfill our dividend policy, or pay
dividends at levels anticipated by investors, the market price
of our shares may be negatively affected and the value of your
investment may be reduced.
|
|
|
We rely on a limited number of suppliers for key equipment
and services. |
We depend upon a small number of suppliers to provide us with
key equipment and services. For example, Nokia Israel provides
our network system based on GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE technology, our
UMTS/ HSDPA core system and related products and services; LM
Ericsson Israel supplies our radio access network and related
products and services based on UMTS/ HSDPA technology; Amdocs
Israel provides us with services with respect to the operating
of, and the implementation of developments to, our billing
system; and Beeri Printers provides our printing supplies
and invoices as well as the distribution, packaging and delivery
of invoices and other mail to the postal service distribution
centers. In addition, we lease a portion of our transmission
capacity from Bezeq, the incumbent landline operator. Bezeq has
experienced labor disputes, including stoppages, during the
recent privatization process and liberalization of the landline
market, and additional disruptions, stoppages and slowdowns may
be experienced in the future. If these suppliers fail to provide
equipment or services to us on a timely basis, we may be unable
to provide services to our subscribers in an optimal manner
until an alternative source can be found and our license may be
at risk of revocation for failure to satisfy the required
service standards.
|
|
|
We are a member of the IDB group of companies, one of
Israels largest business groups. This may limit our
ability to expand our business, to acquire other businesses or
to borrow money from Israeli banks. |
We are an indirect subsidiary of IDB, one of Israels
largest business groups. Other subsidiaries of IDB also operate
in the Israeli communication market: Barak and Netvision provide
high speed Internet and international telephone services and
Globcall provides wireline and landline communication services.
As a result, conflicts of interest may arise between us and
other IDB group companies. Due to the limited size of the
Israeli market and due to the high level of regulation of the
Israeli market, in particular in the communications market, our
being a member of the IDB group of companies may limit our
ability to expand our business in the future, to form joint
ventures and strategic alliances and conduct other strategic
transactions with other participants in the Israeli
communications market.
In addition, pursuant to the Guidelines for Sound Bank
Administration issued by the Israeli Supervisor of Banks,
the amount that an Israeli bank may lend to one group of
borrowers and to each of the six largest borrowers of such
banking corporation is limited. Since we are a member of
IDBs group of borrowers, these guidelines may limit the
ability of Israeli banks to lend money to us, although this has
not occurred to date.
19
Risks Relating to Operating in Israel
|
|
|
We conduct our operations in Israel and therefore our
results may be adversely affected by political, economic and
military instability in Israel. |
Our operations, our network and some of our suppliers are
located in Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military
conditions in Israel may directly affect our business. Since the
establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed
conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab
neighbors. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption
or curtailment of trade within Israel or between Israel and its
trading partners could adversely affect our operations and could
make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Since September
2000, terrorist violence in Israel has increased significantly
and negotiations between Israel and Palestinian representatives
have effectively ceased. The establishment in 2006 of a
government in the Palestinian Authority by representatives of
the Hamas militant group has created additional unrest and
uncertainty in the region. Further, Israel was recently engaged
in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, a Lebanese Islamist Shiite
militia group, which involved thousands of missile strikes and
disrupted most
day-to-day civilian
activity in northern Israel. Any armed conflicts, terrorist
activities or political instability in the region would likely
negatively affect business conditions and could harm our results
of operations, including following termination of such conflicts
due to a decrease in the number of tourists visiting Israel.
In addition, in the event that the State of Israel relinquishes
control over certain territories currently held by it to the
Palestinian Authority, we will not be able to provide service
from our cell sites located in Israeli populated areas and on
connecting roads in these territories. This may result in the
loss of subscribers and revenues and in a decrease in our market
share.
|
|
|
Our freedom and ability to conduct our operations may be
limited during periods of national emergency. |
The Communications Law grants the Prime Minister of Israel the
authority, for reasons of state security or public welfare, to
order a telecommunications license holder to provide services to
security forces, to perform telecommunication activities or to
establish a telecommunications facility as may be required for
the security forces to carry out their duties. Further, the
Israeli Equipment Registration and IDF Mobilization Law, 1987,
also permits the registration of engineering equipment and
facilities and the taking thereof for the use of the Israel
Defense Forces. This law further sets the payment for use and
compensation for damages caused to the operator as a result of
such taking. Our general license also permits the Israeli
Government, during national emergencies or for reasons of
national security, to take all necessary actions in order to
ensure state security, including taking control of our network,
and requires us to cooperate with such actions. If national
emergency situations arise in the future and if we are to be
subject during such time to any of the foregoing actions, this
could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and
provide services during such national emergencies and adversely
affect our business operations.
|
|
|
Provisions of Israeli law and our license may delay,
prevent or impede an acquisition of us, which could prevent a
change of control. |
Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers
for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires
special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers
or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may
be relevant to these types of transactions. For example, a
merger may not be completed unless at least 50 days have
passed from the date that a merger proposal was filed by each
merging company with the Israel Registrar of Companies and at
least 30 days from the date that the shareholders of both
merging companies approved the merger. In addition, a majority
of each class of securities of the target
20
company is required to approve a merger. Further, the provisions
of our license require the prior approval of the Ministry of
Communication for changes of control in our Company.
Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential
transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose
country of residence does not have a tax treaty with Israel
exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example,
Israeli tax law does not recognize tax-free share exchanges to
the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers,
Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances
but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous
conditions, including a holding period of two years from the
date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of
shares of the participating companies are restricted. Moreover,
with respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax
deferral is limited in time, and when the time expires, tax then
becomes payable even if no actual disposition of the shares has
occurred.
These provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition
of us, even if such an acquisition would be considered
beneficial by some of our shareholders.
|
|
|
It may be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment
against our officers, our directors and us or to assert
U.S. securities law claims in Israel. |
We are incorporated in Israel. All of our executive officers and
directors reside outside the United States and all of our assets
are located outside the United States. Therefore, it may be
difficult to enforce a judgment obtained in the United States,
against us or any of these persons, in U.S. or Israeli
courts based on the civil liability provisions of the
U.S. federal securities laws. Additionally, it may be
difficult for you to enforce civil liabilities under
U.S. federal securities laws in original actions instituted
in Israel. See Enforceability of Civil Liabilities
for additional discussion on your ability to enforce a civil
claim against us, our executive officers or directors.
Risks Relating to this Offering
|
|
|
We are controlled by a single shareholder who can
significantly influence matters requiring shareholders
approval. |
Following the completion of this offering DIC will hold,
directly and indirectly, approximately 59% of our outstanding
share capital. Pursuant to a shareholders agreement among DIC
and certain of our minority shareholders, who in the aggregate
own 5.5% of our ordinary shares, DIC has been granted voting
rights in respect of those shares. In addition to DICs
shareholdings and such additional voting rights, it has the
right to appoint the 20% of our directors that we are required
by our license and articles of association to have appointed by
Israeli citizens and residents among our founding shareholders.
Accordingly, subject to legal limitations, DIC has control over
all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the
election and removal of our directors and the approval of
significant corporate transactions. This concentration of
ownership could delay or prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender
offers, open-market purchase programs or other purchases of our
ordinary shares that might otherwise give our shareholders the
opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market
price for our ordinary shares.
Further, as a foreign private issuer, we will be exempt from the
application of the NYSE rules requiring the majority of the
members of our Board of Directors to be independent and
requiring our Board of Directors to establish independent
nomination and compensation committees. Accordingly, our
minority shareholders will be denied the protection intended to
be afforded by these corporate governance standards.
21
|
|
|
Our share price may be extremely volatile and you may not
be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public
offering price. |
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
ordinary shares in the United States or elsewhere. Negotiations
between the underwriters and us will determine the initial
public offering price and an active trading market for our
shares may never develop or be sustained following this
offering. As a result, the price determined by the underwriters
and us may not be indicative of future market prices. Further,
the stock market has from time to time experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations. For example, any active trading
market that does develop for our shares may depend, in part, on
the research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about our business or us. If no securities or industry
analysts commence coverage of our Company, the trading price for
our shares would be negatively affected. In the event we obtain
securities or industry analyst coverage, if one or more of the
analysts who covers us downgrades our shares, our share price
would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to
cover us or fails to publish regular reports on us, interest in
the purchase of our shares could decrease, which could cause our
share price or trading volume to decline. As a result of these
factors, after this offering you might be unable to resell your
shares at or above the initial public offering price.
|
|
|
A substantial number of our ordinary shares could be sold
into the public market shortly after this offering, which could
depress our share price. |
The market price of our ordinary shares could decline as a
result of sales by our existing shareholders of ordinary shares
in the market after this offering or the perception that these
sales could occur. Once a trading market develops for our
ordinary shares, most of our shareholders will have an
opportunity to sell their shares for the first time, following
the expiration of the
lock-up period agreed
to between these shareholders and the underwriters. These
factors could also make it difficult for us to raise additional
capital by selling shares. Specifically, upon completion of this
offering we will have 97,500,000 ordinary shares outstanding.
This includes the 20,000,000 shares that the selling
shareholders are selling in this offering, which may be resold
in the public market immediately thereafter. The remaining
shares will be able to be sold after this offering as described
in the Shares Eligible for Future Sale section of
this prospectus. See Shares Eligible for Future Sale
for more information regarding these factors. In addition, we
will have 2,500,000 shares reserved for issuance upon the
exercise of outstanding options; the options are subject to
vesting schedules but vesting will be accelerated upon certain
events including any sale by IDB that leads to any reduction in
IDBs ownership below 50.01%.
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a
U.S. public company. |
As a public company, we will incur significant legal,
accounting, reporting and other expenses that we did not incur
before listing on the NYSE. We expect the rules and regulations
to which we will be subject as an NYSE-listed company to
increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. We also expect
these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability
insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits
and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the
same or similar coverage. As a result, we may experience more
difficulty attracting and retaining qualified individuals to
serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers. We
cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may
incur as a result of these requirements or the timing of such
costs.
22
|
|
|
We have not yet evaluated our internal control over
financial reporting in compliance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
Following the completion of this offering, we will be required
to comply with the internal control evaluation and certification
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by
the end of our 2007 fiscal year. We have only recently begun the
process of determining whether our existing internal control
over financial reporting systems is compliant with
Section 404. If it is determined that we are not in
compliance with Section 404, we may be required to
implement new internal control procedures and re-evaluate our
financial reporting. We may experience higher than anticipated
operating expenses as well as outside auditor fees during the
implementation of these changes and thereafter. Further, we may
need to hire additional qualified personnel in order for us to
be compliant with Section 404. If we are unable to
implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it could
harm our operations, financial reporting or financial results
and could result in our conclusion that our internal controls
over financial reporting are not effective.
23
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made statements under the captions Prospectus
Summary, Risk Factors, Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects, Business and
in other sections of this prospectus that are forward-looking
statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by
forward-looking words such as may,
might, will, should,
expect, plan, anticipate,
believe, estimate, predict,
potential or continue, the negative of
these terms and other comparable terminology. These
forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks,
uncertainties and assumptions about us, may include projections
of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth
strategies and anticipated trends in our business. These
statements are only predictions based on our current
expectations and projections about future events. There are
important factors that could cause our actual results, level of
activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from
the results, level of activity, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements,
including those factors discussed under the caption entitled
Risk Factors. You should specifically consider the
numerous risks outlined under Risk Factors.
Although we believe the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of
activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor
any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. We
assume no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements
after the date of this prospectus to conform our prior
statements to actual results or revised expectations, except as
otherwise required by law.
24
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
The following table shows, for each of the months indicated, the
high and low exchange rates between the NIS and the
U.S. dollar, expressed as NIS per U.S. dollar and
based upon the daily representative rate of exchange as
published by the Bank of Israel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS) | |
|
(NIS) | |
August 2006
|
|
|
4.408 |
|
|
|
4.357 |
|
September 2006
|
|
|
4.394 |
|
|
|
4.297 |
|
October 2006
|
|
|
4.302 |
|
|
|
4.238 |
|
November 2006
|
|
|
4.331 |
|
|
|
4.247 |
|
December 2006
|
|
|
4.234 |
|
|
|
4.176 |
|
January 2007
|
|
|
4.260 |
|
|
|
4.187 |
|
The following table shows, for periods indicated, the average
exchange rate between the NIS and the U.S. dollar,
expressed as NIS per U.S. dollar, calculated based on the
average of the representative rate of exchange on the last day
of each month during the relevant period as published by the
Bank of Israel:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Average | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(NIS) | |
2002
|
|
|
4.736 |
|
2003
|
|
|
4.512 |
|
2004
|
|
|
4.483 |
|
2005
|
|
|
4.503 |
|
2006
|
|
|
4.442 |
|
As of February 5, 2007, the daily representative rate of
exchange between the NIS and the U.S. dollar as published
by the Bank of Israel was NIS 4.254 to $1.00.
The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on our business and
operations is discussed in Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk.
25
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from this offering.
DIVIDEND POLICY
Our board of directors adopted a dividend policy to distribute
each year at least 75% of our annual net income determined under
Israeli GAAP, subject to applicable law, our license and our
contractual obligations and provided that such distribution
would not be detrimental to our cash needs or to any plans
approved by our Board of Directors. Our Board will consider,
among other factors, our expected results of operation,
including changes in pricing and competition, planned capital
expenditure for technological upgrades and changes in debt
service needs, including due to changes in interest rates or
currency exchange rates, in order to reach its conclusion that a
distribution of dividends will not prevent us from satisfying
our existing and foreseeable obligations as they become due. In
addition, there is an agreement among the controlling
shareholders of IDB, our ultimate parent company, to target a
dividend distribution of at least 50% of its distributable gains
each year. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our Board of
Directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time
and for any reason, not to pay dividends. For example, our Board
may determine that our cash needs for debt service, capital
expenditures or operations may increase and that it would not be
prudent to distribute dividends. Accordingly, you should not
expect that any particular amount will be distributed by us as
dividends at any time, even if we have previously made dividend
payments in such amount.
Our ability to pay dividends is subject to limitations under our
credit facility and Israeli law:
Credit facility. Our credit facility limits our ability
to pay dividends, including by limiting our distribution of
dividends in respect of any financial year so that any
distributions based on retained earnings accumulated since
January 1, 2006, do not exceed the lesser of (a) 75%
of our aggregate net income from January 1, 2006 to the
date of distribution and (b) the aggregate eligible
dividend amount from January 1, 2006 to the date of
distribution, the eligible dividend amount being the
lesser of (i) our net income for each financial year and
(ii) the excess of free cash flow over 110% of total debt
service for each financial year. In addition, we are also
permitted to make distributions out of the expected
approximately NIS 280 million ($65.1 million)
adjustment to retained earnings referred to below in
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Overview New Israeli accounting standard affecting
measurement of fixed assets. Once we have made the
required principal repayment under the facility that is due on
March 9, 2010, the aforesaid limitation may be replaced, at
our option, with a new limitation on dividend distributions such
that dividends to be distributed for the period between
March 9, 2010 and the final repayment date may not exceed
the difference between (a) the forecasted cash, cash
equivalents and free cash flow (as defined in the facility, such
forecast to be pre-approved by the lenders) for the period
ending on the final repayment date (not to exceed our free cash
flow for the equivalent period in the previous financial year),
and (b) 110% of total debt service for the period
commencing on the proposed dividend payment date and ending upon
final repayment date.
Israeli Law. Israeli law provides that dividends may only
be paid out of cumulative retained earnings or out of retained
earnings over the prior two years, provided that there is no
reasonable concern that the payment of the dividend will prevent
us from satisfying our existing and foreseeable obligations as
they become due. Further, our license requires that we and our
10% or more shareholders maintain at least $200 million of
combined shareholders equity. DICs
shareholders equity was NIS 4.859 billion
($1.13 billion) at September 30, 2006.
Prior to 2006, we had not distributed dividends. In January
2006, we distributed a dividend in the amount of NIS
1.7 billion ($395 million). In February 2006, we
adopted our current dividend policy. From then through the date
of this prospectus, we have distributed additional dividends in
26
an aggregate amount of NIS 2.13 billion
($495 million), which, together with our distribution in
January 2006, constitutes substantially all of our retained
earnings from inception to December 31, 2005 and, for the
first six months of 2006, substantially 75% of our net income in
accordance with Israeli GAAP consistent with the new policy. Our
Board of Directors has not yet determined the amount of
dividends to be paid with respect to the third or fourth quarter
of 2006. Our net income in the third quarter of 2006 under
Israeli GAAP was NIS 120 million ($27.9 million). In
addition, when we publish financial statements for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007, our retained
earnings will be retroactively increased (effective
January 1, 2007) by approximately NIS 280 million
($65.1 million) as a result of a change in Israeli
accounting standards (see Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects New Israeli accounting standard
affecting measurement of fixed assets). Our Board of
Directors will make a determination as to the dividend payments
to be made with respect to the second half of 2006 and the first
quarter of 2007, and from such increase in retained earnings
following finalization of our financial results for the first
quarter of 2007. In making the determination, our Board will
take into account the considerations set forth above.
Had our existing policy been in effect for prior periods, we
believe we would have been financially able to distribute 75% of
our net income each year since 2003. Our principal cash needs,
aside from operations, are debt service and capital
expenditures. In each year since 2003, our cash generated by
operating activities (which reflects a deduction for interest
expense), less capital expenditures, was substantially in excess
of 75% of our net income. Our cash generated by operating
activities is higher than our net income because:
|
|
|
|
|
we incur substantial non-cash depreciation and amortization
expense that reduces our net income; and |
|
|
|
we have not typically required significant working capital; our
customers generally pay us within 45 days of the end of
each monthly billing cycle in which the service was provided,
while most of our service providers accept payment on a delayed
basis. |
The following table compares our cash flow from operating
activities less cash used in investing activities to amounts
that may have been distributed had our existing policy been in
effect at all times since January 1, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
Cash available for dividends(1)
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
Dividend distribution pursuant to current policy(2)
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(1) |
We have not deducted cash used to make principal repayments of
debt in determining cash available for dividends as we have been
able to access the debt markets as needed in the past to
refinance any existing debt coming due, and we anticipate that
we will continue to be able to do so. |
|
(2) |
Calculated as 75% of net income. Does not take into account
contractual or other restrictions that may have been in effect
at such times. |
Based on our current expectations, we expect that we will
continue for at least the next twelve months to generate net
cash from operating activities in excess of 75% of our net
income. However, our performance in future periods will depend
on a variety of factors described under Risk
Factors, many of which are beyond our control, including
changes in the regulatory environment and competition.
We intend to declare dividends in NIS and convert them for
payment in US$ based upon the daily representative rate of
exchange as published by the Bank of Israel prior to the
distribution date.
27
We currently expect that the quarterly dividend we will declare
for the first quarter of 2007, which may be funded out of a
combination of net income, existing retained earnings and/or a
portion of the approximately NIS 280 million of retained
earnings described under Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects Overview New Israeli
accounting standard affecting measurement of fixed assets,
will be NIS 1.4 per share. Any dividends must be declared
by our Board of Directors, which will take into account the
factors set out above. The amount of dividends per share we will
pay for the first quarter does not necessarily reflect dividends
that will be paid for future quarterly periods, which can change
at any time in accordance with the policy set out above.
28
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
September 30, 2006. This table should be read in
conjunction with Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects and our consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Total debt
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, NIS 0.01 par value per share,
300,000,000 shares authorized, 97,500,000 issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserve
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
29
DILUTION
Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2006 was
NIS (281) million ($(65.3) million) or NIS (2.88)
($(0.67)) per ordinary share. Net tangible book value per share
is determined by dividing our tangible net worth, total assets,
less intangible assets, minus total liabilities, by the
aggregate number of ordinary shares outstanding. As we will not
receive any of the proceeds of this offering, our net tangible
book value will not be affected by the offering. The offering of
the ordinary shares at the initial public offering price of
$20.00 per share represents an immediate dilution to
purchasers of ordinary shares in the offering of $20.67 per
share. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NIS | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assumed initial public offering price
|
|
|
86.04 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
(2.88 |
) |
|
|
(0.67 |
) |
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
83.16 |
|
|
|
20.67 |
|
Dilution is determined by subtracting net tangible book value
per share from the initial public offering price per share.
The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2006,
the number of ordinary shares purchased, the total consideration
paid and the average price per share paid by our existing
shareholders that are affiliated persons in transactions during
the last five years. In addition, the table sets forth the
number of ordinary shares to be sold in the offering by the
selling shareholders, the total consideration and the average
price per share to be paid by the purchasers in this offering,
at the initial public offering price of $20.00 per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
Average Price | |
|
|
Purchased | |
|
Amount | |
|
per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
NIS | |
|
$ | |
|
NIS | |
|
$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Existing shareholders who are affiliated persons(1)
|
|
|
67,761,645 |
|
|
|
6,269 |
(2) |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
92.52 |
|
|
|
20.22 |
|
Purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
86.04 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not reflect dividends of NIS 39.3 ($9.13) per share paid in
2006. |
|
(2) |
DIC paid the consideration in U.S. dollars. The
consideration amount in NIS was calculated according to the
exchange rate at the transaction date. |
Sales by the selling shareholders in this offering will reduce
the number of shares purchased by existing shareholders who are
affiliated persons in the last five years to 48,736,645, or
approximately 50.0%, (47.05% if the over-allotment option is
exercised in full).
The tables above assume no exercise of outstanding share
options. At September 30, 2006, there were no ordinary
shares subject to outstanding options or warrants. However, in
October and November 2006, we granted options in respect of
approximately 2.4 million ordinary shares to our chairman,
officers and senior employees, at an exercise price of NIS 54.21
($12.60). We have not reflected the exercise of these options in
the tables above. However, given the option exercise price of
NIS 54.21 ($12.60), no further dilution will occur.
30
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data in conjunction with the section of this prospectus entitled
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and our
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected data presented below under the captions
Income Statement Data, and Balance Sheet
Data for, and as of the end of, each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 2005, are derived from
the consolidated financial statements of Cellcom Israel Ltd. and
subsidiaries, which financial statements have been audited by
Somekh Chaikin, an independent registered public accounting firm
and a member firm of KPMG International. The consolidated
financial statements as of September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2006 and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the report
thereon, are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected
data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements, the related notes, and the independent
registered public accounting firms report which contains
emphasis paragraphs regarding the convenience translation of the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2006 and as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2005 into US dollars solely for the
convenience of the reader and, as explained below, reporting
periods prior to January 1, 2004 have been adjusted for the
changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency.
The information presented below under the caption Other
Data contains information that is not derived from the
financial statements.
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
CPI. Accordingly, among other things, non-monetary items (such
as fixed assets) were adjusted based on the changes in the
Israeli CPI from the Israeli CPI published for the month in
which the transaction relating to the asset took place up to the
Israeli CPI at the date of the balance sheet. Starting
January 1, 2004, the adjustment of financial statements for
the impact of the changes in the purchasing power of the Israeli
currency was discontinued. The adjusted amounts included in the
financial statements as of December 31, 2003 constitute the
starting point for the nominal financial report as of
January 1, 2004. Any additions made from January 1,
2004 are included at their nominal values.
The selected data presented below for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2005, are derived from the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of Cellcom Israel Ltd. and its
subsidiaries included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected information also includes certain items in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Israeli GAAP differs in certain
significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a summary of
certain significant differences, see note 28 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
For your convenience, the following tables also contain
U.S. dollar translations of the NIS amounts presented at
September 30, 2006, translated using the rate of NIS 4.302
to $1.00, the representative rate of exchange on
September 30, 2006 as published by the Bank of Israel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
(In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except per share data) | |
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
(In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except per share data) | |
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Financial income (expense), net
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(0 |
) |
Income tax
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Basic and diluted net income per share
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
Dividends declared per share(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Data(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,280 |
) |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
(514 |
) |
Subscribers(4)
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Period churn rate(5)
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
ARPU (in NIS)(6)
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Working capital
|
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,639 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
5,311 |
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
U.S. GAAP Data(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
11,100 |
|
|
|
9,085 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All dividends declared were paid in cash in the first nine
months of 2006. |
32
|
|
(2) |
Under U.S. GAAP, DICs acquisition of our shares in
2005 is treated as a purchase that requires a revaluation of our
assets and liabilities, leading to increased amortization
expense of intangible assets, offset by decreased depreciation
expense of tangible assets under U.S. GAAP. In addition, we
were required to push down certain DIC debt and the interest
expense relating to such debt incurred to finance the
acquisition until it was repaid in early 2006, leading to
increased financial expense under U.S. GAAP. See
note 28 to our consolidated financial statements. As a
result of this accounting treatment, U.S. GAAP data
presented for the year ended and as at December 31, 2005
and for the nine months ended and as at September 30, 2006
are not comparable with the data presented for the previous
periods. |
|
(3) |
EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as income before
financial income (expenses), net; other income (expenses), net;
income tax; depreciation and amortization. We present EBITDA as
a supplemental performance measure because we believe that it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out potential
differences caused by variations in capital structure (most
particularly affecting our interest expense given our recently
incurred significant debt), tax positions (such as the impact on
periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net
operating losses or, most recently, our provision for tax
expenses) the age of, and depreciation expenses associated with,
fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense and, until
December 31, 2003, the effects of adjusting for changes in
the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency as
discussed above). EBITDA should not be considered in isolation
or as a substitute for operating income or other statement of
operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP as
a measure of our profitability or liquidity. EBITDA does not
take into account our debt service requirements and other
commitments, including capital expenditures, and, accordingly,
is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available
for discretionary uses. In addition, EBITDA, as presented in
this prospectus, may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures reported by other companies due to differences in the
way that these measures are calculated. |
The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Net income
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Financial expense (income), net
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
Other expenses (income)
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Subscriber data refer to active subscribers. Until June 30,
2006, we had a three-month method of calculating our subscriber
base, which means that we deduct subscribers from our subscriber
base after three months of no revenue generation or activity on
our network by or in relation to both the post-paid and pre-paid
subscriber. We now believe that waiting six months to deduct
subscribers is preferable since many subscribers that were
inactive for three months become active again before the end of
six months. As a result, commencing July 1, 2006, we
adopted a six-month method of calculating our subscriber base,
but have not restated our prior subscriber data presented in
this table to reflect this change. The six-month method is, to
the best of our knowledge, consistent with the methodology used
by other cellular providers in Israel. This change in
methodology resulted in an increase of our number of reported
subscribers by approximately 80,000 compared to the prior
methodology and affected our other key performance indicators
accordingly. |
|
|
|
We also revised our subscriber calculation methodology in 2003
and 2005 but in each case have not restated prior subscriber
data to conform to the new presentation. We estimate that the
change in methodology in 2003 led to a decrease in our reported
subscriber numbers of approximately 300,000 and the change in
methodology in 2005 led to an increase in our reported
subscriber numbers of approximately 84,000. |
|
|
(5) |
Churn rate is defined as the total number of voluntary and
involuntary permanent deactivations in a given period expressed
as a percentage of the number of subscribers at the beginning of
the period. Involuntary permanent deactivations relate to
subscribers who have failed to pay their arrears for the period
of six consecutive months. Voluntary permanent deactivations
relate to subscribers who terminated their use of our services. |
|
(6) |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) is calculated
by dividing revenues from cellular services for the period by
the average number of subscribers during the period and by
dividing the result by the number of months in the period.
Revenues from inbound roaming services are included even though
the number of subscribers in the equation does not include the
users of those roaming services. Inbound roaming services are
included because ARPU is meant to capture all service revenues
generated by a cellular network, including roaming services.
Revenues from sales of extended warranties are included because
they represent recurring revenues generated by |
33
|
|
|
subscribers, but revenues from
sales of handsets, repair services and transmission services are
not. We, and industry analysts, treat ARPU as a key performance
indicator of a cellular operator because it is the closest
meaningful measure of the contribution to service revenues made
by an average subscriber.
|
We have set out below the calculation of ARPU for each of the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
(In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except number of subscribers and months) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
less revenues from equipment sales
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
less other revenues*
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
adjustments to the Israeli CPI**
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues used in ARPU calculation (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Average number of subscribers
|
|
|
2,091,937 |
|
|
|
2,336,264 |
|
|
|
2,477,316 |
|
|
|
2,368,919 |
|
|
|
2,489,453 |
|
|
|
2,467,596 |
|
|
|
2,675,807 |
|
|
|
2,675,807 |
|
Months during period
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
ARPU (in NIS, per month)
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Other revenues includes revenues from repair services and
transmission services. |
|
|
|
|
** |
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
CPI. We reverse these adjustments in presenting ARPU. |
If the change in methodology of calculating our subscriber base
had not changed in July 2006, ARPU for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 would have been NIS 154, which is equal
to ARPU for the corresponding period in 2005.
34
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
The following operating and financial review and prospects
should be read in conjunction with Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
Israeli Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or Israeli
GAAP, which differ in certain respects from U.S. Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, or U.S. GAAP. Note 28
to the audited consolidated financial statements provides a
description of the principal differences between Israeli GAAP
and U.S. GAAP, as they relate to us, a reconciliation to
U.S. GAAP of income and total shareholders equity, a
description of how operating income under U.S. GAAP was
determined, a condensed financial statement of cash flows under
U.S. GAAP and U.S. GAAP supplementary information.
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
consumer price index. Accordingly, among other things,
non-monetary items (such as fixed assets) were adjusted based on
the changes in the Israeli CPI from the Israeli CPI published
for the month in which the transaction relating to the asset
took place up to the Israeli CPI at the date of the balance
sheet. Starting January 1, 2004, the adjustment of
financial statements for the impact of the changes in the
purchasing power of the Israeli currency was discontinued. The
adjusted amounts included in the financial statements as of
December 31, 2003 constitute the starting point for the
nominal financial report as of January 1, 2004. Any
additions made from January 1, 2004 are included at their
nominal values.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements. We have
based these forward-looking statements on our current
expectations and projections about future events. Our actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of many important
factors, including those set forth under Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are the leading provider of cellular communications services
in Israel in terms of number of subscribers, revenues and EBITDA
as of September 30, 2006, providing services to
approximately 2.8 million subscribers in Israel with an
estimated market share of 34.4%.
We earn revenues and generate our primary sources of cash by
offering a broad range of cellular services through our network
covering substantially all of the populated territory of Israel.
These services include basic and advanced cellular telephone
services, text and multimedia messaging services and advanced
cellular content and data services. We also provide
international roaming services to our subscribers in 167
countries as of September 30, 2006 as well as to
subscribers of foreign networks visiting Israel. We offer our
subscribers a wide selection of handsets of various leading
global manufacturers as well as extended warranty services. We
have an advanced 1,300 kilometer fiber-optic transmission
infrastructure. Together with our complementary microwave-based
infrastructure, our fiber-optic infrastructure connects the
majority of our cell sites with the remainder connected using
supplemental transmission capacity leased from Bezeq, the
incumbent landline operator. Having our own transmission network
enables us to save substantial operating cash lease costs that
would be associated with complete reliance on Bezeqs
infrastructure, although these savings are partially offset by
maintenance costs and microwave spectrum fees. It also allows us
to sell transmission and data services to business customers and
telecommunications operators. In April 2006, we received a
license to provide landline telephone services in Israel as well
and we began to offer these services to selected businesses in
July 2006. While we expect landline telephone services to be a
future growth opportunity, we do not expect material revenues
from these services in 2006 or 2007.
35
Our management evaluates our performance through focusing on our
key performance indicators: number of subscribers, churn rate,
average minutes of usage per subscriber, or MOU, average revenue
per subscriber, or ARPU, EBITDA (as defined in
Results of Operations) and operating
income. These key performance indicators are primarily affected
by the competitive and regulatory landscape in which we operate
and our ability to adapt to the challenges posed. We have
modified our process for calculating our number of subscribers
at various times in the past. This modification impacts the
comparability of our subscriber count and other key performance
indicators.
Our competitive landscape is characterized by a highly
penetrated cellular market. Competition is intense and
attracting new subscribers and retaining existing subscribers
has become increasingly difficult and costly. The competition in
our market is expected to increase further as a result of the
implementation of number portability, which is likely to occur
during 2007, as it will remove a deterrent to switching
providers. In the past our revenue growth has largely resulted
from growth in the overall market. Going forward, however, we
intend to drive revenue growth primarily by: maintaining and
enhancing our strong brand; retaining our existing subscribers;
growing our ARPU by offering new and advanced services as well
as increasing our content and roaming revenues; and attracting
new subscribers, mainly from other cellular operators. In
particular, in addition to being an important factor in
selecting a cellular provider, we believe that content and other
value-added services are a potential growth engine for
increasing revenues. With the full launch in the third quarter
of 2006 of our advanced content services, based on 3.5G HSDPA
technology, we have already started to execute our growth
strategy in this area.
The cellular industry is primarily regulated by the Ministry of
Communications. See Regulatory Matters. While our
pricing is not generally regulated, certain of our rates are
subject to regulation. In particular, the reduction of
interconnect tariffs by the Ministry of Communications in March
2005 and March 2006, which will continue through 2008, has
adversely affected our results and requires us to find
alternative sources of revenues to compensate for these
reductions. Further, commencing January 1, 2009, the basic
airtime charging unit, as well as the interconnect tariff unit,
will decrease from the current 12-second basic charging unit to
a one-second basic charging unit. We are implementing various
measures to reduce the impact of this change on our operating
results including by offering attractive calling plans based on
other charging units, while allowing customers to switch to a
basic (one-second) unit calling plan, as our license currently
permits us to do. Finally, in November 2006, the licenses of
Israeli cellular operators, including us, were amended with
respect to the pricing method of calls that terminate in the
voice mail of cellular subscribers. This amendment will come
into effect in January 2007. Management believes that if the
amendment had come into effect as of January 1, 2006, its
effect on an annual basis in 2006, based upon September 2006
data, would have been to decrease our annual revenue and net
income by NIS 70 million and NIS 40-45 million,
respectively.
The construction and operation of our cell sites and other
transmission facilities are highly regulated and require us to
obtain various consents and permits. See Regulatory
Matters Permits for Cell Site Construction. We
have experienced difficulties in obtaining some of these
consents and permits, particularly in obtaining building permits
for cell sites from local planning and building authorities. See
Risk Factors We may not be able to obtain
permits to construct and operate cell sites. However, even
though 27 cell sites are currently the subject of criminal
proceedings (with eight cell sites subject to demolition
orders), we do not expect that the demolition of these
facilities would have a material impact on our results of
operations and financial condition. We are also monitoring the
consultation process with respect to the draft Non-Ionizing
Radiation Regulations published by the Ministry of Environmental
Protection in November 2006. However, until the process is
complete and final draft regulations are proposed, we will not
be in a position to assess their potential impact on our results
of operations and
36
financial condition. Moreover, if we are unable to obtain or
renew building or other consents and permits for our existing
sites or other facilities, we will be required to demolish or
relocate these cell sites and facilities. Our inability to
relocate cell sites or other facilities in a timely manner could
adversely affect our existing network resulting in the loss of
subscribers, prevent us from meeting the network coverage and
quality requirements contained in our license and adversely
impact our network build-out, all of which may have a material
adverse result on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Our profitability is also affected by other factors, including
changes in our cost of revenues and selling, general and
administrative expenses, including depreciation, and finance
expenses.
Following the acquisition by IDB of a majority interest in us in
September 2005, IDB brought in a new management team, including
Ami Erel, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, who had been
President and CEO of Bezeq, Amos Shapira, our Chief Executive
Officer who has been chief executive officer of
Kimberly-Clarks Israeli subsidiary and of El Al Airlines,
and Tal Raz, our Chief Financial Officer, one of the founders
and formerly a director of Partner, one of our principal
competitors. Our new management team has already implemented a
series of initiatives to drive growth, including the continued
enhancement of our distinctive brand, greater focus on customer
service and new sales campaigns, including the launch of new
content services. In addition, from September 2005 to September
2006, our new managements cost-reduction efforts involved
the reduction of our overall workforce, including higher-cost
temporary workers, by over 2%, primarily through the elimination
of over 16% of non-customer facing positions. This streamlining
has improved our operating cost structure and reduced our
general and administrative expenses. Following implementation of
these initiatives, our revenues and operating income increased
by approximately 9% and 24%, respectively, and our general and
administrative expenses decreased by 5%, in the first nine
months of 2006 compared to the first nine months of 2005.
Notwithstanding these savings and managements continued
focus on cost cutting initiatives, we expect that selling
expenses will continue to increase as a result of sales
commissions paid for new subscribers and increased marketing
efforts. Further, the higher cost of 3G enabled handsets to
support our advanced content and data services may increase the
costs related to both subscriber acquisition and subscriber
retention.
Our results are also impacted by currency fluctuations. While
substantially all of our revenues are denominated in NIS, for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, approximately 27%
of cash outflow was denominated in, or linked to, other
currencies, mainly U.S. dollars. These payments included
capital expenditures, cell site rental fees, payments to
equipment suppliers and, in 2006, payments of principal and
interest on our credit facility. Changes to the Israeli CPI, may
also impact our results as our debentures and some of our
expenses are linked to the Israeli CPI. Any devaluation of the
NIS against the U.S. dollar or other non-NIS currencies
will therefore increase the NIS cost of our expenses that are
not denominated in NIS or are linked to those currencies and any
increase in the Israeli CPI will increase the financial expenses
associated with our debentures. We enter into derivative
instruments to mitigate the effect of the various market risks
associated with these expenses. See
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.
Further, we incurred significant debt in late 2005 and in the
first half of 2006, which will increase our financial expenses
compared to historical results. We issued approximately NIS
2.0 billion of two series of debentures which bear interest
at the rates of 5.0% and 5.3% and are linked to the Israeli CPI.
In addition, in March 2006, we entered into an unsecured
syndicated facility agreement with a number of Israeli and
international banks arranged by Citibank N.A. and Citibank
International plc, which provides for a term loan of
$280 million and a revolving credit facility of up to
$70 million. In April 2006, we converted part of the
outstanding dollar loan into an NIS loan. See
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Debt service.
37
In February 2006, our Board of Directors adopted a policy to
distribute at least 75% of our net income as determined under
Israeli GAAP as dividends, subject to compliance with applicable
law, our license and contractual obligations (which currently
limit distribution of dividends) and so long as the distribution
would not be detrimental to our cash needs or any plans approved
by our Board of Directors. During the first nine months of 2006,
we distributed cash dividends in the aggregate amount of NIS
3.83 billion. Prior to 2006, we had not distributed
dividends since our inception. See Dividend Policy
and Liquidity and Capital
Resources Dividend payments. In the future,
however, our Board of Directors may determine that our cash
needs for debt service, capital expenditures or operations may
increase and that it would not be prudent to distribute
dividends.
Our majority shareholder, DIC, has agreed with some of our other
shareholders to endeavor to cause us to undertake an initial
public offering by 2009. We have now decided to become a public
company and list our ordinary shares on the New York Stock
Exchange to take advantage of the equity and debt capital
raising opportunities available to a public company in a deep
and liquid capital market, to have the ability to use equity
based compensation schemes as a tool to incentivize management
to generate positive operating results and to provide access to
certain of our shareholders to exercise their rights under the
registration rights agreement.
|
|
|
New Israeli accounting standard affecting measurement of
fixed assets |
In September 2006, the Israeli Accounting Standards Board
published Israeli Accounting Standard No. 27,
Property, plant and equipment which prescribes rules
for the presentation, measurement and recognition of fixed
assets and related disclosure. Starting January 1, 2007,
when this new standard takes effect, we will retroactively
separate each individual material component of our network that
has an estimated useful life that differs from the dominant
asset within the network, mainly transmission equipment such as
fiber-optic cables and infrastructure. Then, each component will
be retroactively depreciated over its own useful life. The
retroactive application of this standard is expected to increase
our retained earnings as of January 1, 2007 by
approximately NIS 280 million and to have the following
effect on our results of operations for all of the periods
reported herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Decrease in depreciation expense
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax expense
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Decrease in capital gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Increase in net income
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Increase in basic and diluted earnings per ordinary shares
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
It is also expected to have a significant effect on our results
of operations for future periods. See New
Accounting Standards Israeli Accounting Standard
No. 27, Property, plant and equipment.
|
|
|
Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards |
In July 2006, the Israeli Accounting Standards Board published
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 29, Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards. The Standard
provides that entities that are required to report pursuant to
the Israeli Securities Law, 1968 are to prepare their financial
statements for periods beginning as and from January 1,
2008 according to International Financial Reporting Standards,
or IFRS. As we are required to report under the
38
Securities Law as a result of the listing of our debentures on
the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, we will adopt IFRS as our financial
reporting standard in 2008. As part of this adoption, we intend
to include certain balance sheet data as of December 31,
2007, and income statement data for the year then ended, that
will have been prepared according to the recognition,
measurement and presentation principles of IFRS in our annual
financial statements for December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
2006 Share Incentive Plan |
In September 2006, our Board of Directors approved an option
plan for our employees, officers and directors. The plan has an
initial pool of 2,500,000 shares in respect of which
options and restricted stock units, or RSUs, may be granted. In
October and November 2006, we granted options to purchase an
aggregate of 2,414,143 ordinary shares at an exercise price of
$12.60 per share. Among those grants were options to
purchase up to 450,000 ordinary shares to each of Ami Erel, our
Chairman of the Board, and Amos Shapira, our Chief Executive
Officer. The remainder of the options grants was made to our
senior employees.
In general, the options and RSUs vest in four equal installments
on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of
the date of grant. Under Israeli GAAP, we are required to
expense the grant date fair value of the options over their
vesting period in accordance with Israeli Accounting Standard
No. 24. The treatment under U.S. GAAP in accordance
with SFAS 123R is the same. In accordance with these
standards, we estimate the total compensation cost related to
the options granted to be NIS 53 million, of which we
expect to expense approximately NIS 30 million before the
end of 2007. This cost will be recognized over the vesting
period commencing on the date of completion of a public offering
of our ordinary shares. However, the vesting of options and RSUs
will be accelerated upon certain corporate events, including a
merger, a consolidation, a sale of all or substantially all of
our consolidated assets, or a sale of our ordinary shares held
by IDB that leads to any reduction in IDBs ownership to
below 50.01%. If we distribute cash dividends before the
exercise of these options, the exercise price of each option
will be reduced by an amount equal to the gross amount of the
dividend per share distributed.
We derive our revenues primarily from the sale of cellular
network services (such as airtime), handsets and other services,
including extended handset warranties and the provision of
transmission services. Revenues from airtime are derived from
subscribers originating calls on our network and from
interconnect revenues from other operators for calls terminating
on our network. Revenues also include roaming charges that we
bill to our subscribers for the use of the networks of our
roaming partners outside Israel, to which we refer to as
outbound roaming, and charges that we bill to our roaming
partners whose subscribers use our network, to which we refer to
as inbound roaming.
The principal components of our cost of revenues are
interconnect fees, the purchase of handsets, accessories and
spare parts, cell site leasing costs, outbound roaming services
fees, royalty payments to the government of Israel, salaries and
network development and maintenance. Our cost of revenues also
includes depreciation of the cost of our network equipment and
amortization of our spectrum licenses. See
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
and Use of Estimates Long-lived assets
depreciation.
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of sales force
salaries and commissions, advertising, public relations and
promotional expenses. We compensate our sales force through
39
salaries and incentives. As we continue to focus our efforts on
increasing sales of our products and services, we expect our
sales commissions to rise accordingly.
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and compensation, professional and consultancy fees,
leases and maintenance of our offices, bad debt allowance, and
other administrative expenses. Our general and administrative
expenses also include depreciation and maintenance fees, mainly
for our billing system.
|
|
|
Financial income and expenses |
Financial income and expenses consist primarily of interest
expense on long-term and short-term loans and interest on our
debentures, the interest income component of handset long-term
installment sales, the effects of fluctuations in currency
exchange rates, Israeli CPI adjustments related to the Israeli
CPI-linked debentures and other expenses, and income or losses
relating to financial derivative instruments that do not qualify
for hedge accounting according to Israeli GAAP.
|
|
|
Other income and expenses |
Other income and expenses consist primarily of capital gains or
losses from sale of capital assets.
Generally, Israeli companies were subject to corporate tax on
their taxable income at the rate of 36% for the 2003 tax year,
35% for the 2004 tax year and 34% for the 2005 tax year.
Following an amendment to the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New
Version], 1961, which came into effect on January 1, 2006,
the corporate tax rate is scheduled to decrease as follows: 31%
for the 2006 tax year, 29% for the 2007 tax year, 27% for the
2008 tax year, 26% for the 2009 tax year and 25% for the 2010
tax year and thereafter. Israeli companies are generally subject
to capital gains tax at a rate of 25% for capital gains (other
than gains deriving from the sale of listed securities) derived
from assets purchased after January 1, 2003. A deferred tax
asset or liability is created for temporary differences between
income recognized for tax purposes and for accounting purposes.
On November 20, 2006, the Israeli Supreme Court overturned
a previous ruling made by the Israeli District Court regarding
the deductibility for tax purposes of financing expenses that
might be attributed by the Israeli tax authorities to the
financing of dividends. Following this ruling, we recorded in
the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 an
additional tax provision of NIS 39 million, based on the
possibility that part of our financing expenses accrued in the
nine month period ended September 30, 2006 will not be
recognized as a deductible expense for tax purposes. While we
believe that we have reasons justifying the recognition of these
expenses, or part of them, for tax purposes, as of the date of
the financial statements the level of certainty required in
order to recognize these expenses does not exist. As a result,
we recorded the NIS 39 million provision. We are evaluating
the possible effects of the ruling, if any, on our future
results.
Recent Developments
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we added approximately 56,000 net
subscribers, for a total of 2,884,000 subscribers as of
December 31, 2006, compared to an addition of approximately
50,000 net subscribers in the fourth quarter of 2005. Average
monthly usage per subscriber (in minutes of use) for 2006 was
338, compared to 321 in 2005.
40
We have not yet finalized our financial results for the fourth
quarter of 2006, and accordingly the estimates set out in this
paragraph are subject to adjustments that could be material as
we finalize our results. However, we currently expect that
revenues in 2006 will total approximately NIS 5,600 million
to NIS 5,620 million, compared to revenues of
NIS 5,114 million in 2005, and that ARPU will be
approximately NIS 150 to NIS 151, compared to
NIS 151 in 2005. Operating income for 2006 will be
approximately NIS 965 million to NIS 975 million,
including depreciation and amortization of approximately of
NIS 880 million to NIS 885 million, compared to
operating income of NIS 702 million, including depreciation
and amortization of NIS 941 million, in 2005.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
Comparison of nine months ended September 30, 2005
and 2006 |
The following table sets forth key performance indicators for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Change* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Subscribers at end of period(1) (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
Period churn rate(1)(2)
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
pp |
Average monthly usage per subscriber (MOU) (in minutes)(1)(3)
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU)(1)(4) (in NIS)
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
Operating income (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
Net income (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
)% |
EBITDA(5) (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Operating income margin(6)
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
pp |
EBITDA margin(7)
|
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.2pp |
) |
|
|
* |
pp denotes percentage points and this measure of change is
calculated by subtracting the 2005 measure from the 2006 measure. |
|
|
(1) |
Subscriber data refer to active subscribers. Until June 30,
2006, we had a three-month method of calculating our subscriber
base, which means that we deduct subscribers from our subscriber
base after three months of no revenue generation or activity on
our network by or in relation to both the post-paid and pre-paid
subscriber. We now believe that waiting six months to deduct
subscribers is preferable since many subscribers that were
inactive for three months become active again before the end of
six months. As a result, commencing July 1, 2006, we
adopted a six-month method of calculating our subscriber base,
but have not restated our prior subscriber data presented in
this table to reflect this change. The six-month method is, to
the best of our knowledge, consistent with the methodology used
by other cellular providers in Israel. This change in
methodology resulted in an increase of our number of reported
subscribers by approximately 80,000 compared to the prior
methodology and affected our other key performance indicators
accordingly. |
|
(2) |
Churn rate is defined as the total number of voluntary and
involuntary permanent deactivations in a given period expressed
as a percentage of the number of subscribers at the beginning of
the period. Involuntary permanent deactivations relate to
subscribers who have failed to pay their arrears for the period
of six consecutive months. Voluntary permanent deactivations
relate to subscribers who terminated their use of our services. |
|
(3) |
Average monthly minutes of use per subscriber (MOU) is
calculated by dividing the total billable minutes (of outgoing
and incoming calls from other networks, excluding roaming usage)
during the month, by the average number of subscribers during
such month, and by dividing the sum of such results for all
months in the reported period by the number of months in the
period. If the methodology of calculating our subscriber base
had not changed in July 2006, the MOU for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 would have been 339 minutes, which
represents an increase of 4.0% compared with the corresponding
period in 2005. |
|
(4) |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) is calculated
by dividing revenues from cellular services for the period by
the average number of subscribers during the period and by
dividing the result by the number of months in the period.
Revenues from inbound roaming services are included even though
the number of subscribers in the equation does not include the
users of those roaming services. Inbound roaming services are
included because ARPU is meant to capture all service revenues
generated by a cellular network, including roaming services. |
41
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of extended
warranties are included because they represent recurring
revenues generated by subscribers, but revenues from sales of
handsets, repair services and transmission services are not. We,
and industry analysts, treat ARPU as a key performance indicator
of a cellular operator because it is the closest meaningful
measure of the contribution to service revenues made by an
average subscriber.
|
We have set out below the calculation of ARPU for each of the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 (In $) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except number of | |
|
|
subscribers and months) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
less revenues from equipment sales
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
less other revenues*
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
adjustments to the Israeli CPI**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues used in ARPU calculation (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Average number of subscribers
|
|
|
2,467,596 |
|
|
|
2,675,807 |
|
|
|
2,675,807 |
|
Months during period
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
ARPU (in NIS, per month)
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Other revenues include revenues from repair services and
transmission services. |
|
|
|
|
** |
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
CPI. We reverse these adjustments in presenting ARPU. |
|
|
|
If the methodology of calculating our subscriber base had not
changed in July 2006, ARPU for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 would have been NIS 154, which is equal
to ARPU for the corresponding period in 2005. |
|
|
(5) |
EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as income before
financial income (expenses), net; other income (expenses), net;
income tax; depreciation and amortization. We present EBITDA as
a supplemental performance measure because we believe that it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out potential
differences caused by variations in capital structure (most
particularly affecting our interest expense given our recently
incurred significant debt), tax positions (such as the impact on
periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net
operating losses or, most recently, our provision for tax
expenses) and the age of, and depreciation expenses associated
with, fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense and,
until December 31, 2003, the effects of adjusting for
changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency
as discussed above). EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for operating income or other
statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance
with Israeli GAAP as a measure of our profitability or
liquidity. EBITDA does not take into account our debt service
requirements and other commitments, including capital
expenditures, and, accordingly, is not necessarily indicative of
amounts that may be available for discretionary uses. In
addition, EBITDA, as presented in this prospectus, may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies due to differences in the way these measures are
calculated. |
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA with net income and
operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS | |
|
|
millions) | |
Net income
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Financial expenses (income), net
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
Other expenses (income), net
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Operating income margin is defined as operating income as a
percentage of total revenues for each of the applicable periods. |
|
(7) |
EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA as a percentage of total
revenues for each of the applicable periods. |
42
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41.1 |
% |
|
|
41.1 |
% |
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
Income tax
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
The increase in revenues was due primarily to an increase of
approximately 10.7% in our subscriber base (approximately 7.7%
if our calculation methodology had not changed, as discussed
above) and an increase in average usage per subscriber, leading
to increased airtime usage. Revenues also benefited from a
relatively significant increase in roaming services and in
content services. In addition, we sold a larger quantity of
handsets during the first nine months of 2006 compared with the
corresponding period in 2005. The increase in revenues was
offset in part by the reduction of interconnect tariffs by the
Ministry of Communications in March 2005 and again in March
2006. ARPU decreased slightly despite the increase in revenue
from content and roaming services and in airtime usage due to
the reduction in interconnect tariffs.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of our revenues for
the periods indicated based on the various sources thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
Voice services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outgoing air time (including interconnect)
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
% |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Incoming air time
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Roaming
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
Total voice services
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
3,096 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
% |
Other services*
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
% |
Handsets and accessories
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Consists of fixed monthly subscription fees, content services,
text messages, data services, extended warranty fees,
transmission and others. |
During the first nine months of 2006, revenues from services
(which represent approximately 89% of total revenues) increased
by approximately 8.0%, compared with the first nine months of
2005. This increase in revenues from services was primarily as a
result of an increase in our customer base of approximately
10.7% (approximately 7.7% if our calculation methodology had not
changed, as discussed above) (mainly among post-paid
subscribers), an increase in average subscriber usage and an
increase in revenues originating in content and roaming
services. These increases were partially offset by the reduction
in interconnect tariffs.
Revenues from other services also increased mainly as a result
of the growth in content services and sales of data packages. As
a percentage of total revenues, revenues from other services
increased to 14.7% in the first nine months of 2006 from 12.2%
in the corresponding period in 2005.
Handset and accessories revenues (comprising approximately 11%
of total revenues) during the first nine months of 2006
increased by 17.5% compared with the first nine months of 2005.
This increase primarily resulted from an increase of
approximately 8% in the amount of handsets sold, resulting from
sales campaigns launched in 2006, and from an increase in the
average handset sale price due to higher sales of advanced
handsets.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of our revenues for
the periods indicated based on the general types of subscribers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
Individual
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
54.4 |
% |
Business
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
Other*
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Consists of revenues from inbound roaming services and other
services. |
A breakdown of revenues according to types of subscribers
(individual and business) shows an increase during the first
nine months of 2006 compared with the first nine months of 2005
in revenues attributable to individual subscribers of 8.0%, and
an increase in revenues attributable to business subscribers of
5.2%. These increases are the result of a higher subscriber base
and increased usage, and also an increase in the average handset
sale price due to a larger amount of advanced handsets sold in
the period.
44
The following table sets forth the breakdown of our revenues for
the periods indicated based on the general types of subscription
plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
% of Total Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
|
(NIS in millions) | |
|
|
Pre-paid
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Post-paid
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
% |
|
|
3,443 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
% |
Other*
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Consists of revenues from inbound roaming services and other
services. |
A breakdown of revenues according to types of subscription plans
(pre-paid and post-paid) shows that the increase in revenues
resulted mainly from post-paid subscribers. This increase is the
result of an increase in the amount of handsets sold, and an
increase in revenues from services resulting from an increase in
usage, an increase in content revenues and the expansion of our
subscriber base.
|
|
|
Cost of revenues and gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
Cost of revenues services
|
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Cost of revenues equipment
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of revenues services resulted
mainly from an increase in cost of content services, such as
fees to content providers. This increase was also affected by an
increase in outbound roaming activity, resulting in an increase
in payments to international cellular operators.
The increase in cost of revenues equipment resulted
from a larger number of handsets sold, as a result of large
sales campaigns during the period, and from an increase in the
average handset cost due to a larger number of advanced handsets
sold.
The improvement in gross profit was due primarily to higher
airtime usage, an increase in roaming activity, and an increase
in content services. This improvement was partially offset by
the increase in our subsidizing of the cost of handsets sold.
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses and general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Selling and marketing expenses increased as a result of
investments in customer services and an increase in sales
commissions as a result of higher handsets sales and expansion
of our sale channels, which were partially offset by a decrease
in our advertising expenses due to a reduced advertising budget
in 2006 compared to 2005.
General and administrative expenses have decreased due to our
streamlining measures, which reduced most of the expense
categories in our administrative departments. In particular,
from September 2005 to September 2006, we have eliminated over
16% of non-customer facing positions.
Despite our intensified marketing efforts and investment in
customer service, our combined selling and marketing expenses
and general and administrative expenses decreased due to the
streamlining measures that we implemented in late 2005 and early
2006. See Overview.
|
|
|
Financial and other income (expenses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS | |
|
|
millions) | |
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
The increase in financial expenses was due primarily to
increased interest expenses as a result of the increase in our
outstanding indebtedness following the issuance of our
debentures in late 2005 and the first half of 2006, as well as
the credit facility with a syndicate of Israeli and
international banks arranged by Citibank that we entered into
during the first quarter of 2006, raising a total of
approximately NIS 3.6 billion. See
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Debt service Credit facility from bank
syndicate. We expect to continue to incur this higher
level of interest expense.
Interest and expenses associated with increases in the principal
amount of the debentures, as a result of increases in the
Israeli CPI, and interest expenses resulting from the loan
facility with the bank syndicate led by Citibank incurred during
the first nine months of 2006 were approximately NIS
158 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(20.9 |
)% |
The increase was primarily due to an additional tax provision of
NIS 39 million following a decision of the Israeli Supreme
Court in a case to which we were not a party. On
November 20, 2006, the Israeli Supreme Court overturned a
previous ruling made by the Israeli District Court regarding the
deductibility for tax purposes of financing expenses that might
be attributed by the Israeli tax authorities to the financing of
dividends. Following this ruling, we recorded in the nine month
period ended September 30, 2006 an additional tax provision
of NIS 39 million, based on the possibility that part of
our financing expenses accrued in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006 will not be recognized as a deductible
expense for tax purposes. While we believe that we have reasons
justifying the recognition of these expenses, or part of them,
for tax purposes, as of the date of the financial statements the
level of certainty required in order to
46
recognize these expenses does not exist. As a result, we
recorded the NIS 39 million provision. We are evaluating
the possible effects of the ruling, if any, on our future
results.
The increase in income tax was also due to a higher income
before income tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
)% |
The decrease in net income was due mainly to the increase in
income tax and a significant increase in financial expenses as a
result of our new capital structure, which was partially offset
by a significant increase in revenues. We expect this level of
financial expense to continue, and therefore to negatively
impact our income in future periods.
|
|
|
Comparison of 2003, 2004 and 2005 |
The following table sets forth key performance indicators for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Change* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Subscribers at end of period(1) (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Period churn rate(1)(2)
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
(7.4pp |
) |
|
|
(4.9pp |
) |
Average monthly usage per subscriber (MOU) (in minutes)(1)(3)
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU)(1)(4) (in NIS)
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
(13.2 |
)% |
Operating income (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
(26.3 |
)% |
Net income (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
(21.7 |
)% |
EBITDA(5) (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
(14.1 |
)% |
Operating income margin(6)
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
0.1pp |
|
|
|
(3.3pp |
) |
EBITDA margin(7)
|
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
(1.7pp |
) |
|
|
(2.1pp |
) |
|
|
* |
pp denotes percentage points and this measure of change is
calculated by subtracting the 2003 measure from the 2004 measure
and the 2004 measure from the 2005 measure, respectively. |
|
|
(1) |
Subscriber data refer to active subscribers. We revised our
subscriber calculation methodology in 2003 and 2005 but in each
case have not restated prior subscriber data to conform to the
new presentation. We estimate that the change in methodology in
2003 led to a decrease in our reported subscriber numbers of
approximately 300,000 and the change in methodology in 2005 led
to an increase in our reported subscriber numbers of
approximately 84,000. |
|
(2) |
Churn rate is defined as the total number of voluntary and
involuntary permanent deactivations in a given period expressed
as a percentage of the number of subscribers at the beginning of
such period. Involuntary permanent deactivations relate to
subscribers who have failed to pay their arrears for the period
of six consecutive months. Voluntary permanent deactivations
relate to subscribers who terminated their use of our services. |
|
(3) |
Average monthly minutes of use per subscriber (MOU) is
calculated by dividing the total billable minutes (of outgoing
and incoming calls from other networks, excluding roaming usage)
during the month, by the average number of subscribers during
such month, and by dividing the sum of such results for all
months in the reported period by the number of months in the
period. |
|
(4) |
Average monthly revenue per subscriber (ARPU) is calculated
by dividing revenues from cellular services for the period by
the average number of subscribers during the period and by
dividing the result by the number of months in the period.
Revenues from inbound roaming services are included even though
the number of subscribers in the |
47
|
|
|
equation does not include the
users of those roaming services. Inbound roaming services are
included because ARPU is meant to capture all service revenues
generated by a cellular network, including roaming services.
Revenues from sales of extended warranties are included because
they represent recurring revenues generated by subscribers, but
revenues from sales of handsets, repair services and
transmission services are not. We, and industry analysts, treat
ARPU as a key performance indicator of a cellular operator
because it is the closest meaningful measure of the contribution
to service revenues made by an average subscriber.
|
|
|
|
We have set out below the calculation of ARPU for each of the
periods presented: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions, except number | |
|
|
of subscribers and months) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
less revenues from equipment sales
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
less other revenues*
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
adjustments to the Israeli CPI**
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues used in ARPU calculation (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,511 |
|
Average number of subscribers
|
|
|
2,477,316 |
|
|
|
2,368,919 |
|
|
|
2,489,453 |
|
Months during period
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
ARPU (in NIS, per month)
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Other revenues include revenues from repair services and
transmission services. |
|
|
|
|
** |
Pursuant to Israeli GAAP, until December 31, 2003, we
prepared our financial statements on the basis of historical
cost adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of
Israeli currency, the NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli
CPI. We reverse these adjustments in presenting ARPU. |
|
|
(5) |
EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as income before
financial income (expenses), net; other income (expenses), net;
income tax; depreciation and amortization. We present EBITDA as
a supplemental performance measure because we believe that it
facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to
period and company to company by backing out potential
differences caused by variations in capital structure (most
particularly affecting our interest expense given our recently
incurred significant debt), tax positions (such as the impact on
periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net
operating losses or, most recently, our provision for tax
expenses) and the age of, and depreciation expenses associated
with, fixed assets (affecting relative depreciation expense and,
until December 31, 2003, the effects of adjusting for
changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency
as discussed above) and the impact of purchase accounting
(affecting depreciation and amortization expense). EBITDA should
not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating
income or other statement of operations or cash flow data
prepared in accordance with Israeli GAAP as a measure of our
profitability or liquidity. EBITDA does not take into account
our debt service requirements and other commitments, including
capital expenditures, and, accordingly, is not necessarily
indicative of amounts that may be available for discretionary
uses. In addition, EBITDA, as presented in this prospectus, may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies due to differences in the way these measures are
calculated. |
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA with net income and
operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Net income
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Financial expenses (income), net
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Other expenses (income), net
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Operating income margin is defined as operating income as a
percentage of total revenues for each of the applicable periods. |
|
(7) |
EBITDA margin is defined as EBITDA as a percentage of total
revenues for each of the applicable periods. |
48
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated
statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues from
operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
41.6 |
% |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
38.7 |
% |
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Income tax
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
The decrease in our revenues in 2005 was due mainly to the
reduction in interconnect tariffs by the Ministry of
Communications in March 2005 and a decrease in the average
tariff per minute, both resulting in a reduction in ARPU, and a
decrease in the number of handsets sold. This decrease was
offset in part by an increase in domestic airtime usage and in
outbound roaming usage and by an increase in our subscribers
base.
The increase in our revenues in 2004 was due mainly to an
increase in revenues from content services and roaming services,
due to intensified marketing efforts in these areas, as well as
an increase in handset sales due to aggressive sales campaigns.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of our revenues for
the periods indicated based on the various sources thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Voice services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outgoing air time (including interconnect)
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
% |
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
% |
Incoming air time
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
% |
Roaming
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total voice services
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
4,293 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
% |
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
% |
Other services*
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Total services
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
% |
|
|
4,954 |
|
|
|
88.5 |
% |
|
|
4,549 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
% |
Handsets and accessories
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Consists of fixed monthly subscription fees, content services,
text messages, data services, extended warranty fees,
transmission services and others. |
During 2005, revenues from services (comprising approximately
89% of total revenues) decreased by 8.2%, compared with 2004.
This decrease resulted mainly from a decline in ARPU by 13.2%
due primarily to the reduction of interconnect tariffs in March
2005 by the Ministry of Communications. This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in usage of roaming and an
increase in our subscriber base of approximately 6.2%.
During 2004, revenues from services (comprising approximately
88% of total revenues) increased by 4%, compared with 2003. This
increase resulted mainly from an increase in ARPU by 7.4% and an
increase in our subscriber base of approximately 6.5%. The
increase in ARPU was the result of an increase in roaming usage
and content services.
From 2004 to 2005, the revenues from other services, as a
percentage of our total revenues, increased from 11.8% to 12.6%
correspondingly following an increase from 10.6% in 2003 to
11.8% in 2004.
Our revenues from the sale of handsets and accessories decreased
during 2005 by 12.5%, compared with 2004, as the result of the
larger amount of handsets sold in 2004, resulting from
aggressive sales campaigns. This increase in sales of handsets
in 2004 compared to 2003 also explains the increase in handsets
and accessories revenues in 2004 compared to 2003 of 29.7%.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of our revenues for
the periods indicated based on the types of subscribers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Individual
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
% |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
% |
Business
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
% |
Other*
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Consists of revenues from inbound roaming services and other
services. |
A breakdown of revenues according to types of subscribers shows
a decrease in revenues during 2005, compared with 2004, of
approximately 11% from individual subscribers, and of
approximately 8% from business subscribers. This decrease was
mainly due to a decrease in revenues from services primarily
resulting from the erosion of ARPU caused by the decline in
interconnect tariffs, and a decrease in the amount of handsets
sold to individual subscribers.
50
The following table sets forth the breakdown of our revenues for
the periods indicated based on the types of subscription plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
% of total | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Revenues | |
|
revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
(NIS in | |
|
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
|
millions) | |
|
|
Pre-paid
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Post-paid
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
85.1 |
% |
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
4,260 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
% |
Other*
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Consists of revenues from inbound roaming services and other
services. |
A breakdown of revenues according to types of subscription plans
(pre-paid and post-paid) shows that there was a decline in
revenues from pre-paid subscribers in 2005 compared with 2004 of
11.8%, and from post-paid subscribers of 9.1%. This decrease is
the result of a decline in revenues from services, caused
primarily by an erosion in ARPU resulting from the reduction of
interconnect tariffs, and a decrease in the amount of handsets
sold.
The increase in revenues in 2004 compared with 2003 resulted
primarily from an increase in the sales of handsets. This
increase is reflected through the breakdown of revenues
according to subscriber type and payment plan.
|
|
|
Cost of revenues and gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues-services
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
Cost of revenues-equipment
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
(16.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in cost of revenues-services in 2005 compared to
2004 was due mainly to the reduction in interconnect tariffs by
the Ministry of Communications in March 2005 and to the
reduction in salary and related expenses as part of our
streamlining measures. The increase in cost of revenues-services
in 2004 compared to 2003 was related mainly to the increase in
revenues from services and an increase in network maintenance
expenses and insurance expenses. These increases were offset in
part by a decrease in depreciation expenses.
The decrease in cost of revenues-equipment in 2005 compared to
2004 resulted mainly from a decrease in handsets costs due to
the smaller number of handsets sold during this period. This
decrease was partially offset by a significant adjustment to the
carrying value of inventory made in the fourth quarter of 2005.
As we had excess inventory due to overly optimistic sales
projections, we wrote off part of our inventory of i-mode
handsets by approximately NIS 28 million resulting in an
increase in our cost of sales. The increase in cost of
revenues-equipment in 2004 compared to 2003 resulted mainly from
an increase in handset costs due to the large number of handsets
sold during that year as part of an aggressive sales campaign.
The increase in gross profit on sales and services in 2004 was
due mainly to an increase in revenues from content services as
well as to an increase in roaming services, due to intensified
sales campaigns in these areas, as well as a decrease in
subsidies on handset sales. The decrease in gross profit on
sales and services in 2005 was due mainly to the reduction in
51
interconnect tariffs by the Ministry of Communications in March
2005, a reduction of the average tariff per minute and a
decrease in the number of handsets sold.
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses and general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in selling and marketing expenses in 2005 was due
mainly to the reduction in commissions to our distributors as a
result of a decrease in handset sales by them and to a decrease
in our advertising costs. The decrease in general and
administrative expenses in 2005 was due mainly to a reduction in
bad debt expenses, due to improvements in our collection system,
more efficient staff utilization and other efficiencies achieved.
The increase in selling and marketing expenses in 2004 was due
mainly to the increase in commissions paid to our distributors
as a result of an increase in sales of handsets and as a result
of an increase in advertising expenses for sales campaigns
during this period. We were successful in keeping our general
and administrative expenses in 2004 similar to those of 2003
despite the increase in revenues and our number of subscribers.
|
|
|
Financial and other income (expenses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
The transition from financial expenses to financial income in
2005 resulted from a decrease in financial expenses as the
result of the repayment of the majority of our bank loans and
from our hedging against fluctuations in currency exchange rates
and other financial derivative transactions.
Financial income resulting from hedging transactions amounted to
NIS 11 million in 2005, compared with financial expenses of
NIS 28 million in 2004. The change primarily resulted from
sharp fluctuations in the U.S. dollar: NIS exchange rate
during these years, and the use of hedging transactions to
mitigate the risk resulting from these sharp fluctuations.
Financial expenses in 2004 compared with 2003 decreased by
approximately 79%. This sharp decline resulted primarily from
the repayment of the majority of our loans, in the amount of NIS
1.1 billion during 2004. Financial expenses during 2004 for
bank loans decreased by NIS 102 million and financial
expenses from hedging activities decreased by NIS
56 million. These decreases were the result of sharp
fluctuations in the U.S. dollar: NIS exchange rate during
these years.
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
(20.5 |
)% |
The decrease in income tax in 2005 compared to 2004 of
approximately 21% was due mainly to a lower income before taxes
and a lower income tax rate of 34% in 2005 compared to 35% in
2004.
The increase in income tax in 2004 of approximately 19% compared
to 2003 resulted primarily from higher income before taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2005 vs. 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
% |
|
|
(21.7 |
)% |
The decrease in our net income in 2005 was primarily due to
reduced revenues as a result of the reduction of interconnect
tariffs by the Ministry of Communications in March 2005. The
increase in our net income in 2004 was primarily due to the
increase in our gross profit, offset in part by the increase in
our selling and marketing expenses and general and
administrative expenses, and also due to a sharp decrease in our
financing expenses.
U.S. GAAP Results
Our net income in accordance with Israeli GAAP was NIS
418 million and NIS 390 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively, compared
to net income under U.S. GAAP of NIS 460 million and
NIS 374 million. For the years ended December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005, our net income in accordance with Israeli
GAAP was NIS 431 million, NIS 617 million and NIS
483 million compared to NIS 441 million, NIS
620 million and NIS 491 million (on a combined basis),
respectively. Note 28 to our consolidated financial
statements summarizes the principal differences between Israeli
and U.S. GAAP that affect our financial results. Our net
income is not significantly different under U.S. GAAP from
the results under Israeli GAAP due to the offsetting impact of
some of the differences. The principal differences affecting our
results of operations are:
|
|
|
|
|
Push-down accounting. Under U.S. GAAP, DICs
acquisition of our shares is treated as a purchase that requires
a revaluation of our assets and liabilities, leading to
increased amortization expense of intangible assets, offset by
decreased depreciation expense of tangible assets under
U.S. GAAP. In addition, we were required to push down
certain DIC debt and the interest expense relating to such debt
incurred to finance the acquisition until it was repaid in early
2006, leading to increased financial expense under
U.S. GAAP. Push-down accounting had a significant impact on
our balance sheet under U.S. GAAP. |
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment. Under
U.S. GAAP, each individual significant component is
depreciated over its useful life, rather than depreciating all
assets on the basis of the estimated useful life of the dominant
asset. This leads to decreased depreciation expense under
U.S. GAAP. We will adopt a similar policy under Israeli
GAAP beginning in 2007. |
53
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity requirements relate primarily to working capital
requirements, debt service, capital expenditures for the
expansion and improvement of our networks and payment of
dividends. Until the end of 2005, these requirements have been
funded largely through funds generated from operations and bank
borrowings. However, in late 2005 and the first half of 2006, we
raised significant additional capital by issuing two series of
debentures in the aggregate principal amount of approximately
NIS 2.0 billion ($465 million) and by establishing a
credit facility of $350 million. Our Board, at the request
of our shareholders, determined to incur such debt, and pay
dividends in excess of the amount of such debt with available
cash and proceeds of the borrowings, to increase the leverage in
our capital structure and improve our shareholders
expected rate of return on our equity.
We believe that our financial reserves will be sufficient to
fund our anticipated cash needs for working capital, capital
expenditures and debt service for at least the next
12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on
many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the timing
and extent of spending to support marketing and subscriber
retention efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing
activities and the timing of introductions of new products and
enhancements to existing products.
In February 2006, our Board of Directors adopted a policy to
distribute at least 75% of our net income as determined under
Israeli GAAP, subject to compliance with applicable law, our
license and contractual obligations (which currently limit
distribution of dividends) and so long as the distribution would
not be detrimental to our cash needs or to any plans approved by
our Board of Directors. It is possible that our Board of
Directors estimate of our cash needs will be incorrect, or
that events could occur that could increase our cash needs
beyond anticipated. If that occurs, we may not have sufficient
cash to cover these needs as a result of prior dividend
payments, and we would need to identify additional sources of
financing, which could include equity or debt financing. We may
not be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms or at
all.
During the first nine months of 2006, we distributed cash
dividends in the aggregate amount of NIS 3.83 billion
($890 million) based on retained earnings accumulated since
our inception. We did not distribute any dividends prior to 2006.
In December 2005 and January 2006, we issued two series of
debentures to institutional and other investors in private
placements. In May 2006, we issued additional debentures of the
existing two series. The debentures are listed on the Tel Aviv
Stock Exchange. The debentures consist of NIS 1.065 billion
($248 million) aggregate principal amount of Series A
Debentures and approximately NIS 925 million
($215 million) aggregate principal amount of Series B
Debentures. The Series A Debentures bear interest at the
rate of 5.0% per year, linked to the Israeli CPI. The
principal is payable in nine semiannual payments commencing in
July 2008, and the interest is payable semiannually commencing
in July 2006. The Series B Debentures bear interest at the
rate of 5.3% per year, linked to the Israeli CPI. The
principal is payable in five annual payments commencing in
January 2013, and the interest is payable annually commencing in
January 2007.
The debentures are unsecured and do not restrict our ability to
issue additional debentures of any class or distribute dividends
in the future. The debentures contain standard terms and
54
obligations including restriction on our ability to create liens
on our assets, other than fixed liens on assets provided in
connection with financing the purchase of such assets.
|
|
|
Credit facility from bank syndicate |
In March 2006, we entered into an unsecured syndicated facility
agreement with a number of Israeli and international banks
arranged by Citibank N.A. and Citibank International plc, which
provides for a term loan of $280 million and a revolving
credit facility of up to $70 million. The term loan is
repayable in installments ranging from 10% to 25% of the
principal, commencing 24 months after the date of the
agreement and maturing on December 22, 2010. Amounts drawn
under the revolving credit facility are repayable within a
period of one to six months, at our discretion, and final
maturity is December 22, 2010. On April 10, 2006, we
converted part of the outstanding dollar loan into an NIS loan.
We repaid an amount of $137.5 million (comprised of
$110 million on account of the term loan and
$27.5 million on account of the revolving credit facility)
and we received in exchange an amount of NIS 633 million
(comprised of a term loan in the amount of NIS 506 million
and a revolving credit facility in the amount of NIS
127 million). As of September 30, 2006, the
outstanding principal amounts denominated in U.S. dollars
and NIS were as follows: $170 million and NIS 506.4
($117.7 million) under the term loan facility; and
$36.1 million and NIS 107.6 million
($25.0 million) under the revolving credit facility.
Dollar denominated loans under the credit facility bear interest
at an annual rate of
one-to-six-month LIBOR
plus a margin that depends on our ratio of net debt to EBITDA as
of the last financial statement provided prior to each interest
period as follows: 1.35% if our ratio is equal to or greater
than 2.5:1; 1.05% if the ratio is greater than or equal to 1.5:1
but lower than 2.5:1; or 0.80% if the ratio is less than 1.5:1.
As of September 30, 2006, the average interest rate on the
outstanding dollar loans was three-month LIBOR + 1.05% per
year. The NIS loans bear interest at an annual rate of
one-to-six-month Tel
Aviv Interbank Offered Rate, or TELBOR, plus up to 0.3% and a
variable margin ranging from 0.8% to 1.35% , depending on our
ratio of net debt to EBITDA, as in the dollar loans described
above. As of September 30, 2006, the average interest rate
on the outstanding NIS loans was three-month TELBOR + 1.05% +
0.17% per year.
The facility agreement includes standard provisions with respect
to voluntary prepayment, events of default, financial covenants
and restrictive covenants. The events of default include the
loss of control of the Company by IDB or DIC, the revocation of
our license, or any amendment of our license that would have a
material adverse effect on us, any demands under indemnity
letters to local planning and building committees in excess of
$50.0 million in the aggregate (or provision or note in our
financial statements with respect thereof) and any material
adverse change. The financial covenants require that we maintain
a ratio of net debt to EBITDA of not more than 2.5:1, and a
ratio of EBITDA to net interest expense of at least 5.0:1. The
restrictive covenants include, among other things, limitations
on liens, loans, guarantees and indemnities, the incurrence of
indebtedness, acquisitions, dispositions of assets, mergers and
other changes of control. Our credit facility limits our ability
to pay dividends, including by limiting our distribution of
dividends in respect of any financial year so that any
distributions based on retained earnings accumulated since
January 1, 2006, do not exceed the lesser of (a) 75%
of our aggregate net income from January 1, 2006 to the
date of distribution and (b) the aggregate eligible
dividend amount from January 1, 2006 to the date of
distribution, the eligible dividend amount being the
lesser of (i) our net income for each financial year and
(ii) the excess of free cash flow over 110% of total debt
service for each financial year. In addition, we are also
permitted to make distributions out of the expected
approximately NIS 280 million ($65.1 million)
adjustment to retained earnings referred to above in
Overview New Israeli accounting
standard affecting measurement of fixed assets. Free cash
flow is defined as EBITDA with the addition or subtraction of
changes in working capital, minus capital expenditures and any
amounts paid or payable in respect of tax. Debt service is
defined as the payments on account of principal and interest of
our loans, including payments in respect of commissions and other
55
expenses. Once we have made the required principal repayment
under the facility that is due on March 9, 2010, the
aforesaid limitation may be replaced, at our option, with a new
limitation on dividend distributions such that dividends to be
distributed for the period between March 9, 2010 and the
final repayment date may not exceed the difference between
(a) the forecasted cash, cash equivalents and free cash
flow (as defined in the facility, such forecast to be
pre-approved by the lenders) for the period ending on the final
repayment date (not to exceed our free cash flow for the
equivalent period in the previous financial year), and
(b) 110% of total debt service for the period commencing on
the proposed dividend payment date and ending upon final
repayment date. In addition, we are required to enter into
foreign exchange and interest rate hedging agreements pursuant
to which at least 66% of any loans outstanding at any time under
the credit facility agreement are hedged.
As of September 30, 2006, a balance of NIS
87.5 million under other credit facilities was outstanding.
This balance will be payable as follows: NIS 50 million in
November 2006, and the remainder of NIS 37.5 million in six
equal quarterly payments until January 2008.
Our accrual capital expenditure in 2003, 2004 and 2005 amounted
to NIS 658 million, NIS 739 million and NIS
747 million, respectively. Accrual capital expenditure is
defined as investment in fixed assets and other assets, such as
spectrum licenses, during a given period. For the periods under
review, a key focus of our capital investment has been the
introduction of our 1800MHz GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network and the
build out of our UMTS/ HSDPA network. With the completion of
these projects, we do not intend to embark on any significant
capital expenditure programs during 2007.
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
Our cash flows from operating activities increased by 6.7%, from
NIS 1,000 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 to NIS 1,067 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, due primarily to the
increase in operating income.
Our cash flows from operating activities decreased by 13.5%,
from NIS 1.47 billion for 2004 to
NIS 1.27 billion for 2005, due primarily to the
decrease in operating income. In addition, cash flows from
operating activities increased by 5.6%, from NIS
1.39 billion for 2003 to NIS 1.47 billion for 2004.
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
The net cash flows from operating activities is the main capital
resource for our investment activities. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, net cash used in investing activities
amounted to NIS 511 million, primarily to our technological
network infrastructure vendors, compared with NIS
445 million during the corresponding period in 2005, which
represents an increase of 14.8%.
In 2003, 2004 and 2005, our net cash used in investing
activities amounted to NIS 697 million (not including our
NIS 189 million long-term deposit repayment), NIS
852 million and NIS 619 million, respectively. The
payments were primarily for the expansion of the technological
network and information systems infrastructures.
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
The net cash used in financing activities during the first nine
months of 2006 amounted to NIS 2,210 million, compared
with NIS 536 million during the corresponding period in
2005.
56
During the first half of 2006 we received long-term loans in the
amount of NIS 1.6 billion under the credit facility, and
NIS 250 million was received as the result of the issuance
of additional debentures of the same series. Furthermore, we
paid cash dividends during the first nine months of 2006 in the
amount of NIS 3.83 billion.
In 2005, net cash provided by financing activities amounted to
NIS 1,114 million, which was generated by the issue of our
debentures of NIS 1.7 billion and offset by a repayment of
NIS 592 million of bank loans, including NIS
533 million for long-term loans and NIS 59 million for
short-term loans. Net cash used in financing activities in 2003
and 2004 were NIS 603 million and NIS 1,068 million,
respectively.
During the first nine months of 2006, the average outstanding
amount of long-term liabilities (long-term loans and debentures)
was NIS 3.2 billion.
During 2005, the monthly average outstanding amount of
short-term credit was NIS 50 million. For the same period,
the average outstanding amount of long-term loans was NIS
544 million.
During 2004, the monthly average outstanding amount of
short-term credit was NIS 123 million. For the same period,
the average outstanding amount of long-term loans was NIS
1.3 billion.
Our working capital as of September 30, 2006 was NIS
180 million, compared with working capital of NIS
1,909 million as of December 31, 2005. The decline in
working capital is the result of the decline in cash and
cash-equivalents, resulting from the payment of cash dividends
to our shareholders during the first nine months of 2006.
As of December 31, 2004, we had negative working capital of
NIS 138 million. The increase in working capital during
2005 was the result of an increase in cash and cash-equivalents,
the issue of two series of debentures and the repayment of loans
during 2005, as described above. Substantially all of the cash
received from the issue of the debentures was distributed as a
cash dividend to our shareholders during the first quarter of
2006.
Working capital as of December 31, 2003 was negative, and
amounted to NIS 361 million.
Trade receivables consist of outstanding amounts due from
customers, mainly for cellular services and handsets and
accessories, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Most of
our handset sales are made on an installment basis (generally,
36 monthly payments). Installments due in the twelve months
following the balance sheet date are included in current trade
receivables; the remaining installments are included in
long-term receivables. As of September 30, 2006, net trade
receivables amounted to NIS 1,259 million compared to NIS
1,237 million as at December 31, 2005. This increase
was primarily due to the increase in our revenues, which was
offset by an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts of
NIS 30 million and a repayment of one receivable in the
amount of NIS 43 million. The current maturity of long-term
receivables as of September 30, 2006 was NIS
556 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on
our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
57
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Set forth below is a description of our contractual cash
obligations, in millions of NIS, as of September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007-2009 | |
|
2010-2011 | |
|
2012 and Beyond | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt obligations (including interest)(1)
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Capital (finance) lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet under
GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Interest on our credit facilities is calculated using LIBOR plus
1.05% and TELBOR plus 0.17% plus 1.175 to 1.25%, depending on
the facility, using LIBOR and TELBOR in effect on
November 30, 2006. Because the interest rate under the
credit facility is variable, actual payments may differ.
Interest does not include (a) payments that could be
required under our interest-rate swap agreements, which payments
will depend upon changes in interest rates and could vary
significantly, or (b) any increase in interest that would
be required based on increases in the Israeli CPI. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the course of our normal operations, we are exposed to market
risks including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,
interest rates and the Israeli CPI. We are exposed to currency
risks primarily as a result of purchasing inventory and fixed
assets mainly in U.S. dollars while almost all of our cash
receivables are in NIS. A substantial amount of our cash
payments are incurred in, or linked to, non-NIS currencies. In
particular, in 2005 and the nine months ended September 30,
2006, payments in U.S. dollars represented approximately
25% of total cash outflows. Also, we are exposed to interest
rate risks through our bank and hedging instruments and to
possible fluctuations in the Israeli CPI through our debentures.
We do not generally hedge our interest rates other than as
required by our credit facility, which requires us to hedge a
portion of our interest rate exposure.
In order to protect ourselves from fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates, we have established a foreign currency
hedging program. Under this program, we currently hedge part of
our U.S. dollar liabilities, firm commitments and budgeted
expenditures for the next 6 to 12 months using foreign
currency forward exchange contracts and currency options. A
foreign currency forward exchange contract is a contract whereby
we agree to buy or sell a foreign currency at a predetermined
exchange rate at a future date. A currency option is an option
to buy or sell a foreign currency at a predetermined exchange
rate at a future date. The exchange rate fluctuations that
impact our foreign currency denominated financial liabilities,
firm commitments and budgeted expenditures are intended to be
offset by gains and losses on these hedging instruments.
The goal of our hedging program is to lock in the exchange rates
of our transactions denominated in U.S. dollars. We do not
hold derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Nevertheless, under Israeli GAAP, we are required to treat our
hedges of budgeted expenditures for which there is no
contractual commitment as though they were speculative
investments. As a result, we are required to value these hedge
positions at the end of each fiscal quarter and record a gain or
loss equal to the difference in their market value from the last
balance sheet date, without any reference to the change in value
to the related budgeted expenditures. Accordingly, these
differences could result in significant fluctuations in our
reported net income.
58
We protect ourselves from fluctuations in foreign currency rates
in respect of our U.S. dollar long-term loans in the amount
of $170 million as of September 30, 2006, by utilizing
compound foreign currency and interest swaps, throughout the
entire period of the loan.
From time to time, we receive short-term U.S. dollar loans
with a variable LIBOR interest rate. In order to hedge the
possible fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rate
between the U.S. dollar and the NIS, we execute swap
transactions. As of September 30, 2006, we held short-term
U.S. dollar loans in the amount of $36 million. These
loans have been hedged through a swap transaction for the full
period of the loan.
Also, as of September 30, 2006, we had two outstanding
series of debentures, which are linked to the Israeli CPI, in an
aggregate principal amount of approximately NIS
2.0 billion. During the first nine months of 2006, we
executed five forward Israeli CPI/ NIS transactions, in a total
amount of NIS 500 million, each for a period of
12 months, in order to hedge our exposure to fluctuations
in the Israeli CPI. We periodically review the possibility of
entering into additional transactions in order to lower the
exposure in respect of the debentures.
Set forth below is the composition of the derivative financial
instruments at the following dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Par Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In NIS millions) | |
Forward contracts on exchange rate (mainly US$ NIS)
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Forward contracts on Israeli CPI rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Options on the exchange rate (mainly US$ NIS)
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Compounded foreign currency and interest swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without taking into account our hedging instruments and based
upon our debt outstanding as at September 30, 2006,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates
or the Israeli CPI would affect us as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of 0.1% of the Israeli CPI would result in an
increase of approximately NIS 2.0 million in our financial
expenses; |
|
|
|
a devaluation of the NIS against the U.S. dollar of 1.0%
would increase our financial expenses by approximately NIS
9.0 million; and |
|
|
|
an increase in NIS interest rates of 100 basis points would
increase our annual interest expense by approximately NIS
6.2 million ($1.4 million). An increase in
U.S. dollar interest rates of 100 basis points would
increase our annual interest expense by approximately
$2 million. |
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Use of
Estimates
Until December 31, 2003, we prepared our financial
statements on the basis of historical cost adjusted for the
changes in the general purchasing power of the NIS based upon
changes in the Israeli CPI. Accordingly, among other things,
non-monetary items (such as fixed assets) were
59
adjusted based on the changes in the Israeli CPI from the index
published in respect of the month of all of the transactions up
to the index in respect of the balance sheet month. Starting
January 1, 2004, the adjustment of financial statements for
the impact of the changes in the purchasing power of the Israeli
currency was discontinued. The adjusted amounts included in the
financial statements as of December 31, 2003 constitute the
starting point for the nominal financial report as of
January 1, 2004. Any additions made during the period are
included in their nominal values.
The preparation of our financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reflected in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience,
where applicable, and on other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions, and could have a material
impact on our reported results.
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular
transaction, event or activity is specifically dictated by
accounting principles and does not require managements
judgment in its application, while in other cases,
managements judgment is required in the selection of the
most appropriate alternative among the available accounting
principles, that allow different accounting treatment for
similar transactions.
We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are
critical to our financial results and to the understanding of
our historical and future performance, as these policies relate
to the more significant areas involving managements
estimates and assumptions. We consider an accounting estimate to
be critical if: 1) it requires us to make assumptions
because information was not available at the time or it included
matters that were highly uncertain at the time we were making
our estimate and 2) changes in the estimate or different
estimates that we could have selected may have had a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
|
Nature of critical estimate items |
As described in Note 2.L to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, we recognize
revenues from services as they are provided and revenues from
sales of handsets and accessories upon delivery.
|
|
|
Assumptions/approach used |
We recognize service revenues based upon minutes used, net of
credits and adjustments for service discounts. As a result of
the cutoff times of our multiple billing cycles each month, we
are required to estimate the amount of service revenues earned
during the period, but not yet billed, from the end of each
billing cycle to the end of each reporting period. These
estimates are primarily based on historical usage and billing
patterns.
The accounting estimates used in the results of operations
related to the recognition of revenue require us to make
assumptions about possible future billing adjustments arising
from disputes with subscribers and discounts not taken into
consideration at the time of billing.
|
|
|
Effect if different assumptions used |
Management believes that the provisions (relevant to revenue
recognition) recorded for each reporting period represent its
best estimate of future outcomes, but the actual outcomes could
differ from the estimate selected. The impact of variances in
actual performance versus the amounts recorded could have an
adverse effect on the accounts receivable reported on the
60
balance sheet and the results reported in the statements of
operations, and could be material to our financial condition.
|
|
|
Long-lived assets depreciation |
|
|
|
Nature of critical estimate items |
The cellular communications industry is capital intensive. The
depreciation of operating assets constitutes a significant
operating cost for us. We have substantial investments in
tangible long-lived assets, primarily our communications
networks.
|
|
|
Assumptions/approach used |
We depreciate our network equipment by the straight-line method,
on the basis of the estimated useful lives of the dominant asset
within each group of assets, mainly over 6.7 years
(15% per year). On January 1, 2007, a new Israeli
accounting standard will come into effect, pursuant to which we
will retroactively separate individual components with estimated
useful lives that are different from the entire network, mainly
transmission equipment (such as fiber-optic cables) and
infrastructures. The retroactive application of this
depreciation of individual components is expected to have a
material effect on our results of operations and financial
position for all of the reported periods. See
New Accounting Standards Israeli
Accounting Standard No. 27, Property, plant and
equipment. Leasehold improvements are depreciated
over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or lease terms
that are reasonably assured. We periodically review changes in
our technology and industry conditions to determine adjustments
to estimated remaining useful lives and depreciation rates. Such
adjustments would affect depreciation prospectively.
|
|
|
Effect if different assumptions used |
Changes in technology or changes in our intended use of these
assets can cause the estimated period of use or the value of
these assets to change. Actual economic lives may differ from
estimated useful lives. Periodic reviews could result in a
change in our assets depreciable lives, and therefore, our
depreciation expense in future periods.
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
Nature of critical estimate items |
We review finite-lived long-lived assets, principally consisting
of property, plant and equipment, and spectrum licenses for
impairment based on the requirements of Israeli Accounting
Standard No. 15, or whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be
recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows. If
necessary, we write down the assets to their estimated fair
values.
|
|
|
Assumptions/approach used |
In analyzing finite-lived long-lived assets for potential
impairment, significant assumptions that are used in determining
the undiscounted cash flows of the asset group include:
|
|
|
|
|
cash flows attributed to the asset group; |
|
|
|
future cash flows for the asset group, including estimates of
residual values, which incorporate our views of growth rates for
the related business and anticipated future economic
conditions; and |
|
|
|
period of time over which the assets will be held and used. |
61
|
|
|
Effect if different assumptions used |
The use of different estimates of assumptions within our
undiscounted cash flow modes (e.g., growth rates, future
economic conditions, estimates of residual values) could result
in undiscounted cash flows that are lower than the current
carrying value of an asset group, thereby requiring the need to
compare the carrying value of the asset group to its fair value.
The use of different discount rates when determining the fair
value of the asset group could result in different fair values,
and impact any related impairment charges. A different method of
determining fair value, other than a discounted cash flow model,
could result in a lower or higher fair value for the asset group.
Since our incorporation, we have written down an aggregate of
NIS 10 million of the value of our real estate property in
Modiin, Israel.
|
|
|
Accounts receivable bad debt and allowance for
doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
Nature of critical estimate items |
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect
estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain
subscribers to make required payments.
|
|
|
Assumptions/approach used |
We regularly evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful
accounts by taking into account variables such as past
experience, age of the receivable balance and current economic
conditions of the party owing the receivable balance. If the
financial conditions of certain subscribers were to deteriorate,
resulting in impairment in their ability to make payments,
additional allowance for doubtful accounts may be required.
|
|
|
Effect if different assumptions used |
We believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate
to cover estimated losses in customer accounts receivable
balances under current conditions. However, changes to the
allowance for doubtful accounts may be necessary in the event
that the financial condition of our customers improves or
deteriorates.
|
|
|
Liabilities arising from litigation |
We are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in
the ordinary course of business. We make provisions for
liabilities arising from litigation in accordance with
SFAS No. 5, which requires us to provide for
liabilities arising from litigation when the liabilities become
probable and estimable. We continually evaluate our pending
litigation to determine if any developments in the status of
litigation require an accrual to be made. It is often difficult
to accurately estimate the ultimate outcome of the litigation.
These variables and others can affect the timing and amount we
provide for certain litigation. Our accruals for legal claims
are therefore subject to estimates made by us and our legal
counsel, which are subject to change as the status of the legal
cases develops over time. Such revision in our estimates of the
potential liability could materially impact our financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
|
|
|
Push-down accounting for U.S. GAAP
only |
Following its acquisition in September 2005, DIC held a 94.5%
controlling interest in our outstanding share capital, and 100%
control of our voting rights. As a result, SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin Topic 5J, requires the acquisition by the parent
company to be pushed-down, meaning the
post-transaction financial statements of the acquired company
should reflect
62
a new basis of accounting. In accordance with Israeli GAAP,
reflecting the September 2005 transaction through a new basis of
accounting is not permitted.
The purchase price paid as a result of this transaction has been
allocated to a proportionate amount of our underlying assets and
liabilities based upon DICs acquired interests in the
respective fair market values of our assets and liabilities at
the date of the transaction. The excess of the purchase price
over the identified assets and liabilities is considered as
goodwill.
Goodwill and other identifiable assets are tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
Impairment losses are not reversed. Impairment is determined by
assessing the recoverable amount of the Company. If the
recoverable amount of the Company is less than the carrying
amount, an impairment loss is recognized. Any future impairment
which might be required, could materially impact our financial
condition or results of operations.
Estimates were used in the course of the acquisition by DIC to
determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired.
The application of purchase accounting required that the total
purchase price be allocated to the fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the
acquisition date. The allocation process required an analysis of
all such assets and liabilities including acquired contracts,
customer relationships, licenses, contractual commitments and
legal contingencies to identify and record the fair value of all
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In valuing acquired
assets and assumed liabilities, fair values were based on, but
were not limited to: future expected cash flows; current
replacement cost for similar capacity for certain property,
plant and equipment; market rate assumptions for contractual
obligations; estimates of settlement costs for litigation and
contingencies; and appropriate discount rates and growth rates.
The approach to the estimation of the fair values of our
intangible assets involved the following steps: preparation of
discounted cash flow analyses; deduction of the fair values of
tangible assets; determination of the fair value of identified
significant intangible assets; reconciliation of the individual
assets returns with the weighted average cost of capital;
and allocation of the excess purchase price over the fair value
of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired to goodwill.
Determining the particular asset economic lives for intangible
assets and for tangible fixed assets involves the exercise of
judgment and can materially affect the reported amounts for
amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of tangible
fixed assets.
We account for income taxes under Israeli Accounting Standard
No. 19, Taxes on Income. Income taxes are
accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
classified as current or non-current items in accordance with
the nature of the assets or liabilities to which they relate.
When there are no underlying assets or liabilities, the deferred
tax assets and liabilities are classified in accordance with the
period of expected reversal. Income tax expenses represent the
tax payable for the period and the changes during the period in
deferred tax assets and liabilities.
To compute provisions for taxes, estimates need to be made.
Estimates are also necessary to determine whether valuation
allowances are required against deferred tax assets. These
involve assessing the probabilities that deferred tax assets
resulting from deductible temporary
63
differences will be utilized. Uncertainties exist with respect
to the interpretation of complex tax regulations and the amount
and timing of future taxable income. Given the complexity,
differences arising between the actual results and the
assumptions made, or future changes to such assumptions, could
necessitate adjustments to tax income and expense in future
periods. We establish reasonable provisions for possible
consequences of tax audits. The amount of such provisions is
based on various factors, such as experience of previous tax
audits and differing interpretations of tax regulations by
ourselves and the tax authorities.
New Accounting Standards
|
|
|
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 26,
Inventory |
In August 2006, the Israel Accounting Standards Board published
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 26, Inventory.
This standard provides guidelines for determining the cost of
inventory and its subsequent recognition as an expense as well
as for determining impairment in value of inventory written down
to net realizable value of the inventory. This standard also
provides guidelines regarding cost formulas used to allocate
costs to various types of inventory. This standard will apply to
financial statements for periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2007. Implementation of Standard No. 26 is
not anticipated to have a material effect on our results of
operations and financial position.
|
|
|
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 27, Property,
plant and equipment |
In September 2006, the Israel Accounting Standards Board
published Israeli Accounting Standard No. 27,
Property, plant and equipment. Standard No. 27
prescribes rules for the presentation, measurement and
recognition of fixed assets and for the disclosure required in
respect thereto. Standard No. 27 provides among other
things the following:
Standard No. 27 provides that a group of similar fixed
asset items should be measured at cost net of accumulated
depreciation, less impairment losses, or alternatively, at its
revalued amount less accumulated depreciation, whereas an
increase in the value of the asset to above its initial cost as
a result of the revaluation will be directly included in
shareholders equity under a revaluation reserve.
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
Standard No. 27 provides, that upon the initial recognition
of a fixed asset, the cost of the item should include all the
costs expected to be incurred in respect of a liability to
dismantle and remove the item and to restore the site on which
it was located.
Standard No. 27 provides that if an item of property, plant
and equipment consists of several components with different
estimated useful lives, the individual significant components
should be depreciated over their individual useful lives.
Standard No. 27 will apply to financial statements for
periods beginning on January 1, 2007, and will be adopted
on a retroactive basis, except for asset retirement obligations,
for which the initial adoption will be in accordance with the
provisions of Standard No. 27.
64
The initial implementation of Standard No. 27 is expected
to have the following effects:
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
Implementation of Standard No. 27 is anticipated to result
in the initial recognition of liabilities to dismantle and
remove assets and to restore the site with respect to our cell
sites, retail stores and general and administrative facilities,
and accordingly there will be an increase in net book value of
the fixed assets and an increase in long-term liabilities due to
the obligation for asset retirement. Also, there will be a
decrease in retained earnings in the amount of approximately NIS
7 million, net of related taxes. The additional cost will
be recognized over the useful life of the asset. The obligation
is recognized at fair value, and the accretion expense will be
recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to
its expected settlement value.
We utilized group depreciation for our network and transmission
equipment and depreciation has been calculated on the basis of
the estimated useful life of the dominant asset within each
group. Upon adoption of Standard No. 27, starting
January 1, 2007, we will retroactively separate individual
components with estimated useful lives that are different from
the entire network, mainly transmission equipment such as
fiber-optic cables and infrastructure. The retroactive
application of this components depreciation is expected to
increase our retained earnings as of January 1, 2007, in
the amount of approximately NIS 280 million. It is expected
to have a significant effect on our results of operations for
future periods.
|
|
|
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 29, Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) |
In July 2006, the Israel Accounting Standards Board published
Accounting Standard No. 29, Adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The
standard provides that entities that are required to report
pursuant to the Securities Law must prepare their financial
statements for periods beginning as and from January 1,
2008 according to IFRS. The standard permits early adoption for
financial statements released after July 31, 2006.
In accordance with this standard, we are required to include in
our annual financial statements for December 31, 2007,
balance sheet data as at December 31, 2007 and statement of
operations data for the year then ended, that have been prepared
according to the recognition, measurement and presentation
principles of IFRS.
We are examining the effect of the adoption and implementation
of IFRS on our financial statements.
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP Accounting Standards |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued revised SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, or SFAS No. 123(R).
SFAS No. 123(R) sets accounting requirements for
share-based compensation to employees and requires
companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date
fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation.
SFAS No. 123(R) is effective in interim or annual
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As of
September 30, 2006 and for all reported periods, we did not
have any share based compensation available to
employees; as such, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
did not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3, or SFAS No. 154. SFAS No. 154
changes the accounting for and reporting of a change in
accounting principle. The provisions of SFAS No. 154
require, unless impracticable, retrospective application to prior
65
periods financial statements of (i) all voluntary
changes in accounting principles and (ii) changes required
by a new accounting pronouncement, if a specific transition is
not provided. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change
in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for
long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in
accounting estimate, which requires prospective application of
the new method. SFAS No. 154 is effective for all
accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after
December 12, 2005. Our adoption of SFAS No. 154
is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated
results of operations or financial position.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
or FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertain Tax
Positions An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes. It
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are
currently evaluating the effect that the application of
FIN 48 will have on our results of operations and financial
condition.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156 that
amends FASB Statements No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities. The new statement should be adopted as of the
beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. We do not anticipate that the adoption
of this new statement at the required effective date will have a
significant effect on our results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS No. 157.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value (replacing all prior
definitions) and creates a framework to measure fair value, but
does not create any new fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective in the first quarter of
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. It will
become effective for us on August 1, 2008. We are
evaluating how it may affect our consolidated financial
statements.
In its September 2006 meeting, the FASBs Emerging Issue
Task Force reached a consensus on Issue
No. 06-1,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Service Provider
to Manufacturers or Resellers of Equipment Necessary for an
End-Customer to Receive Service from the Service Provider,
that if the consideration given by a service provider to a
manufacturer or reseller (that is not a customer of the service
provider) can be linked contractually to the benefit received by
the service providers customer, a service provider should
use the guidance in
EITF 01-9 to
characterize the consideration.
EITF 01-9 presumes
that an entity should characterize cash consideration as a
reduction of revenue unless an entity meets the requirements of
paragraph 9 of
EITF 01-9. Under
EITF 01-9,
consideration other than cash consideration should be
characterized as an expense. If the service provider does not
control the form of the consideration provided to the service
providers customer, the consideration should be
characterized as other than cash. The consensus is effective for
the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15,
2007. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that
have not yet been issued. Entities should recognize the effects
of applying the consensus on this issue as a change in
accounting principle through retrospective application to all
prior periods under Statement 154. Adoption of this issue
is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
66
THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IN ISRAEL
General
The following table sets forth selected macro statistics about
Israel at and for the year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Population (millions)
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
GDP ($ billions)
|
|
|
123.7 |
|
GDP per capita($)
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Exports of goods & services ($ billions)
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
CPI change
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Long-term local currency sovereign credit rating by S&P
|
|
|
A |
+ |
Unemployment rate (December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Source: OECD, 2005 and Ministry of Finance of Israel,
2006.
The size of Israeli telecommunications services revenues in 2005
was approximately NIS 24 billion and telecommunications
spending was approximately 4.4% of GDP, higher than in other
developed economies such as the European Union and the United
States. Telecommunications services consist of five main
segments which, except for landline services, are highly
competitive. We estimate that, of the total telecommunications
services revenues in 2005, approximately 57% was comprised of
cellular services, approximately 24% was local landline voice
and Internet services, approximately 6% was international voice
services and approximately 13% was multichannel television
services.
Israel has high penetration rates across all telecommunications
services that are in line with or higher than other developed
economies such as the European Union and the United States.
These levels of penetration can be attributed to the rapid
adoption rate of new technologies, high expenditures on
telecommunications services by consumers and businesses and a
relatively young population.
Cellular Services
Cellular telephone services were first introduced in Israel in
1986. For the first nine years of cellular operations there was
only one operator, Pelephone, a subsidiary of Bezeq, and growth
of cellular telephone services, as well as penetration rates,
was limited. After the commercial launch of Cellcom in December
1994, cellular penetration rates and cellular phone usage
increased significantly. This is mainly due to the fact that our
license was awarded to us based upon, among other things, our
commitment to offer our services at low prices during the first
five years of our operation.
The Israeli cellular market is highly penetrated. The market
reached an estimated penetration rate (the ratio of cellular
subscribers to the Israeli population) at September 30,
2006 of approximately 116%, representing approximately
8.2 million cellular subscribers.
The following table sets forth the growth in the total number of
cellular subscribers in Israel and the penetration rate over the
last three and a half years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total subscribers (millions)
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Cellular penetration(%)
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
Source: |
Reported by Cellcom, Partner and Pelephone. Cellcom estimates
for MIRS as MIRS does not disclose operating information. |
67
There are currently four cellular operators in Israel: Cellcom,
Partner, Pelephone, and MIRS. We estimate that the distribution
of cellular subscribers among these operators as of
September 30, 2006 was: Cellcom (34.4%), Partner (31.9%),
Pelephone (28.7%) and MIRS (5%). Subscriber data are based on
public information except for MIRS, which is based on our
estimate. However, there is no uniform method of counting
subscribers.
We are majority-owned by DIC, a subsidiary of IDB, and started
operations at the end of 1994. Partner is majority-owned by
Hutchinson Whampoa Ltd. and started operations in 1998.
Pelephone is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bezeq and started
operations in 1986. The major controlling shareholder of Bezeq
following its privatization in 2005 is a consortium comprised of
Saban Capital Group (controlled by the media entrepreneur Haim
Saban), Apax Partners (the international private equity firm)
and Arkin Communications (controlled by the Israeli businessman
Mori Arkin). MIRS, wholly owned by Motorola, had its license
upgraded from
push-to-talk to a
cellular license in February 2001.
The following table sets forth the key milestones in the history
of the Israeli cellular services:
|
|
|
1986
|
|
Bezeq and Motorola create a joint venture called
Pelephone, which becomes Israels first
cellular operator. Pelephone launches N-AMPS services |
1994
|
|
Cellcom awarded a license and launches TDMA services |
1997
|
|
Cellcom introduces first pre-paid plan to the market |
1998
|
|
Partner awarded a license and launches GSM services |
1998
|
|
Pelephone launches CDMA services |
2001
|
|
Ministry of Communications allocates additional 2G and 3G
cellular frequencies for existing cellular operators and for the
licensing of a new operator |
2001
|
|
MIRS becomes Israels fourth cellular operator with iDEN
services |
2002
|
|
Cellcom launches GSM/GPRS services |
2003
|
|
Cellcom launches EDGE services |
2004
|
|
Partner launches UMTS services |
|
|
Pelephone launches EVDO services |
2006
|
|
Cellcom launches full scale UMTS/HSDPA services |
|
|
Partner begins deploying HSDPA |
|
|
|
Key characteristics of the Israeli cellular services
market |
The following paragraphs describe the key characteristics of the
Israeli cellular services market:
|
|
|
High cellular telephone penetration. The estimated
penetration rate in Israel as of September 30, 2006 was
116%. Penetration rate is calculated by dividing the total
number of subscribers by the Israeli population. The Israeli
population does not include foreign workers and Palestinian
subscribers who are included in the number of subscribers. The
number of subscribers may also include subscribers to more than
one network including those in the process of switching
networks. As a result, the effective penetration rate after
adjustment for these factors is likely to be somewhat lower than
116%. |
|
|
Favorable demographics. Population growth is generally
high and the population is relatively younger than in other
developed economies. |
|
|
Favorable geography and high population density around a few
urban centers. Israel covers a small area of territory of
approximately 8,000 square miles (20,700 square
kilometers). In addition, Israel is relatively flat and dry.
Moreover, the population tends to be concentrated in a small
number of geographical locations. These characteristics
facilitate efficient network roll out. |
68
|
|
|
High cellular voice usage. The average cellular voice
usage per subscriber in Israel is more than 300 minutes per
month, which is higher than the average cellular voice usage per
subscriber in most developed economies. |
|
|
Low average voice revenue per minute. Cellular operators
in Israel have lower average voice revenues per minute than in
most developed economies. This is a consequence, among other
things, of the importance given to low prices in the first five
years of our operation, in the awarding criteria during the
original licensing process for a second cellular operator. |
|
|
Different cellular technologies. We use TDMA, GSM/ GPRS/
EDGE and UMTS/ HSDPA networks. Partner uses GSM/ GPRS and UMTS/
HSDPA networks. Pelephone uses CDMA, CDMA1x and EVDO networks.
MIRS uses an iDEN network. |
|
|
High potential for value-added services. The contribution
of non-voice revenues to total revenues in the Israeli cellular
market is below the level of other developed markets such as the
European Union. This characteristic is attributable in part to
the low voice tariffs in Israel compared to the tariffs in other
markets, which has the effect of keeping text messaging usage
low. We believe that there is potential for narrowing this gap
by increasing marketing efforts of new content services and the
growth in our existing 3G subscriber base. Moreover, the
percentage of post-paid subscribers is relatively high when
compared to other developed economies, which we believe
facilitates the acceptance of value-added services. |
|
|
Calling party pays. In Israel, as in many western
European countries, the party originating the call pays for the
airtime. Cellular telephone network operators do not charge
subscribers for calls received on their handsets, except while
roaming abroad. |
|
|
Low annual churn rates. The average annual churn rate in
Israel was 12.6% in 2005, which is lower than the churn rates in
other developed economies. |
The following table sets forth a comparison between Israeli
cellular services metrics and similar metrics in other developed
economies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Data | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues as | |
|
|
|
|
Penetration | |
|
2005 MOU | |
|
2005 Yield per | |
|
2005 ARPU | |
|
% of Total | |
|
2005 Annual | |
|
|
(%)(1) | |
|
(min/month) | |
|
Minute ($c) | |
|
($) | |
|
Revenues (%) | |
|
Churn Rate (%) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Israel
|
|
|
112 |
% |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
United Kingdom
|
|
|
113 |
% |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
France
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
Germany
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
United States
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
Spain
|
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
Italy
|
|
|
120 |
% |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
South Korea(2)
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
Taiwan(3)
|
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
Source: |
Pyramid Research (except for Israeli penetration which is
based on data reported by Cellcom, Partner and Pelephone and
Cellcom estimates for MIRS as MIRS does not disclose operating
information). |
|
|
(1) |
As of December 2005. |
|
(2) |
Based on the 2005 Annual Reports of South Korean operators, LG
Telecom, KT Freetel and SK Telecom, and Goldman Sachs Research. |
|
(3) |
Based on the 2005 Annual Reports of Taiwanese operators,
Chunghwa Telecom, Far Eastone and Taiwan Mobile, and Goldman
Sachs Research. |
69
Landline Services
Bezeq operates approximately 2.9 million lines and provides
local services. The second largest competitor in landline
telephony services is HOT Telecom, or HOT, jointly owned by the
three Israeli cable TV operators, which started landline
operations in late 2003. HOTs network has been upgraded to
offer Internet, data and voice services.
In recent years, Bezeq has experienced a significant drop in its
traffic volume. Bezeq is a monopoly and thus subject to enhanced
regulatory scrutiny, including supervision of tariffs.
There are four new players that have entered this market
recently, including us and Partner.
|
|
|
Broadband and Internet services |
Israeli broadband services are characterized by high growth and
high penetration levels. The Ministry of Communications
estimates that at the end of 2005, there were 1.1 million
subscribers, and the household penetration rate was 52%. Also,
approximately 99% of Bezeqs lines enabled broadband
services in 2004.
The dominant broadband access technologies are ADSL and cable.
The first ADSL services were launched by Bezeq in 2000 and
currently represent a 65% share of broadband connections. Cable
modems, which account for the rest of the market, have been
available since 2002.
Transmission and landline data services are provided by Bezeq,
HOT, Med-1 (whose operations were recently acquired by Partner)
and us. These services are provided to business customers and to
telecommunications operators.
Internet access is currently provided by five major Internet
service providers, or ISPs: Barak, NetVision (Barak and
NetVision recently announced a merger between themselves and
with Globcall, all three of which are members of the IDB Group),
Bezeq International (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bezeq),
Internet Gold and Golden Lines (Internet Gold and Golden Lines
recently announced a merger), and some other niche players. All
these major providers are also suppliers of international voice
services.
|
|
|
International voice services |
International voice services in Israel have been open for
competition since December 1996. Until then, Bezeq International
was the only supplier of such services. Bezeq International was
created as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bezeq in 1994 as part of
the Israeli governments initiative to separate the major
operations of the incumbent operator. Barak and Golden Lines
were allocated international voice services licenses and started
operating at the beginning of 1997, enabling them to compete
with Bezeq International. In April 2004, further competition was
introduced in international voice services through the issuance
of new licenses to NetVision, Internet Gold and Xfone
Communications. Today there is no single dominant player in this
market, and competition is very intense.
The multichannel pay-TV
market is also highly penetrated with levels above those of most
developed economies. Multichannel
pay-TV services are
provided by HOT and by YES, a subsidiary of Bezeq.
70
BUSINESS
General
We are the leading provider of cellular communications services
in Israel in terms of number of subscribers, revenues and EBITDA
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Upon launch
of our services in 1994, we offered significantly lower prices
for cellular communications services than the incumbent provider
and transformed the nature of cellular telephone usage in
Israel, turning it into a mass market consumption item. We
surpassed the incumbent cellular operator and became the market
leader in terms of number of subscribers in 1998 and, despite
the entry of two additional competitors, we have continued since
then to have the highest number of subscribers. As of
September 30, 2006, we provided services to approximately
2.83 million subscribers in Israel with an estimated market
share of 34.4%. Our closest competitors have market shares of
31.9% and 28.7%, respectively. In the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006, we generated revenues of NIS
4.2 billion ($974 million), EBITDA of NIS
1429 million ($322 million), and operating income of
NIS 762 million ($177 million). See note 3 to the
Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Data for a
definition of EBITDA.
We offer a broad range of cellular services through our cellular
networks covering substantially all of the populated territory
of Israel. These services include basic and advanced cellular
telephone services, text and multimedia messaging services and
advanced cellular content and data services. We also offer
international roaming services in 167 countries. We offer our
subscribers a wide selection of handsets from various leading
global manufacturers, as well as extended warranty and repair
and replacement services. We also offer landline transmission
and data services to business customers and telecommunications
operators and, since July 2006, we offer landline telephony
services to selected businesses.
Our History
We were incorporated in 1994 in Israel. We hold one of the four
general licenses to provide cellular telephone services in
Israel. Our cellular license was granted by the Ministry of
Communications in 1994 and is valid until 2022.
Our principal founding shareholders were DIC a subsidiary of
IDB, which prior to September 2005 indirectly held approximately
25% of our share capital, and BellSouth Corporation and the
Safra brothers of Brazil, which together indirectly held
approximately 69.5% of our share capital and voting rights in
respect of an additional 5.5% of our share capital. IDB acquired
the stakes of BellSouth and the Safra brothers in September 2005
and, following the sale of minority stakes to four groups of
investors in 2006, IDB currently indirectly holds 78.5% of our
share capital and voting rights in respect of an additional 5.5%
of our share capital.
Following the acquisition by IDB in 2005, IDB put in place a new
management team, including Ami Erel, the Chairman of our
Board of Directors, who had previously been President and CEO of
Bezeq, Amos Shapira, our Chief Executive Officer, who had been
CEO of Kimberly-Clarks Israeli subsidiary and El Al
Airlines, and Tal Raz, our Chief Financial Officer, one of the
founders and formerly a director of Partner, one of our
principal competitors. Our new management team has already
implemented a series of initiatives to drive our growth,
including the continued enhancement of our distinctive brand, a
greater focus on customer service and new sales campaigns. In
addition, from September 2005 to September 2006, while
increasing the number of positions in units that deal directly
with our customers (such as sales and service), which we call
customer-facing positions, our new managements
cost-reduction efforts reduced our overall workforce, including
higher-cost temporary workers, by over 2%, primarily through the
elimination of over 16% of positions in units that do not deal
directly with our customers, which we call non-customer facing
positions. Also, contracts with our main suppliers were
renegotiated to reduce costs. Our management structure has also
been rationalized by providing customer-
71
facing executives with a direct reporting line to our CEO and
through the merging of technology sub-units. Following the
implementation of these initiatives, our revenues and operating
income increased by approximately 9% and 24%, respectively, and
our general and administrative expenses decreased by 5% in the
first nine months of 2006 compared to the first nine months of
2005.
The following table presents our number of subscribers and
revenues for each of the last five years and the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Subscribers (end of period) (in thousands)(1)
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
Revenues (in NIS millions)
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Subscriber data refer to active subscribers. Until June 30,
2006, we had a three-month method of calculating our subscriber
base, which means that we deduct subscribers from our subscriber
base after three months of no revenue generation or activity on
our network by or in relation to both the post-paid and pre-paid
subscriber. We now believe that waiting six months to deduct
subscribers is preferable since many subscribers that were
inactive for three months become active again before the end of
six months. As a result, commencing July 1, 2006, we
adopted a six-month method of calculating our subscriber base,
but have not restated our prior subscriber data presented in
this table to reflect this change. The
six-month method is, to
the best of our knowledge, consistent with the methodology used
by other cellular providers in Israel. This change in
methodology resulted in an increase of our number of reported
subscribers by approximately 80,000 compared to the prior
methodology. |
|
|
|
We also revised our subscriber calculation methodology in 2003
and 2005 but in each case have not restated prior subscriber
data to conform to the new presentation. We estimate that the
change in methodology in 2003 led to a decrease in our reported
subscriber numbers of approximately 300,000 and the change in
methodology in 2005 led to an increase in our reported
subscriber numbers of approximately 84,000. |
Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths will enable
us to maintain and enhance our position as the leading provider
of cellular communications services in Israel:
|
|
|
|
|
Unique combination of leading market position and strong
operational momentum. In the last year, we have achieved
market-leading subscriber and revenue growth while steadily
strengthening our operating margins. Leveraging a series of
brand, customer service and content initiatives and a
rationalization of our management structure, our new senior
management team has managed to solidify Cellcoms leading
market position as reflected in our subscriber base, revenues
and EBITDA while controlling capital expenditures. |
|
|
|
Strong and distinctive own brand. Our established brand
enjoys strong recognition in Israel. Since 2004, we have made
the enhancement of our image among consumers a top priority and
have invested substantial resources to position Cellcom as a
local cellular company with a warm personal touch. Our focus on
music and music-related content services, particularly our
Cellcom Volume initiative, is our leading marketing
theme and one that associates us with the important growth
opportunity presented by advanced cellular content and data
services. |
|
|
|
Transmission infrastructure and landline services. We
have an advanced fiber-optic transmission infrastructure that
consists of approximately 1,300 kilometers of inland fiber-optic
cable, which, together with our complementary microwave-based
infrastructure, connects the majority of our cell sites and
provides for substantially all of our backhaul services. Our
transmission infrastructure significantly reduces our
operational reliance on Bezeq, the incumbent landline operator
in Israel, while also saving us substantial
infrastructure-leasing cash costs. As our transmission network
has transmission and data |
72
|
|
|
|
|
capacity in excess of our own backhaul needs, and covers the
majority of Israels business parks, we offer transmission
and data services to business customers and telecommunications
providers. In addition, since July 2006, following the receipt
of a landline transmission, data and telephony services license,
we offer landline telephony services to selected businesses. |
|
|
|
Strategic relationship with a leading group of local and
international shareholders. Our ultimate parent company,
IDB, is one of the largest business groups in Israel. We enjoy
access, through our management services agreement, to the senior
management of the IDB group, who are some of the most
experienced managers in Israel. These managers, including
veterans of the Israeli telecommunications market, provide us
with financial, managerial and strategic guidance. In 2006, our
shareholder base was broadened as a result of IDBs sale of
minority stakes to a series of highly regarded international and
local financial investors, including affiliates of Goldman
Sachs, Bank Leumi, Migdal Group and the First International Bank
of Israel. |
|
|
|
Strong management team. Since IDB acquired control of us
in September 2005, we have put in place a team of seasoned
managers with significant experience and solid track records in
previous managerial positions. Our Chairman, Mr. Ami Erel,
is a veteran of the Israeli communications market and previously
served as the chief executive officer of Bezeq. Our chief
executive officer, Mr. Amos Shapira, has been chief
executive officer of Kimberly-Clarks Israeli subsidiary
and of El Al Airlines, where he was credited with its successful
restructuring and improvements in customer service. Our chief
financial officer, Mr. Tal Raz, has extensive experience in
the Israeli cellular market, as he was involved in the formation
of one of our main competitors, Partner, and served as a member
of its board of directors. Under the leadership of
Messrs. Erel, Shapira and Raz, we have demonstrated
significant improvements in our operating results and believe
that we are well positioned to continue this trend and to
execute our business strategy. |
|
|
|
Strong cash flow generation. We have a proven track
record of strong financial performance and profitability with
cash operating margins that have been higher than those of our
principal competitors. As a result, we have been able to invest
in our business and deploy advanced network technology so that
we can offer advanced services and applications, as well as
distribute dividends to our shareholders. |
Business Strategy
Our goal is to strengthen our position as the leading cellular
provider in Israel. The principal elements of our business
strategy are:
|
|
|
|
|
Maximize customer satisfaction, retention and growth. Our
growth strategy is focused on retaining our subscribers and
expanding the selection of services and products we offer to our
subscribers in order to enhance customer satisfaction and
increase average revenues per user, or ARPU. We strive to
continually improve and enhance the flexibility of our customer
service to shorten the time required to fulfill subscriber
requests. From September 2005 to September 2006, despite a
reduction in our overall workforce, we increased our
customer-facing staff by 2%. In addition to providing quality
customer service, we also strive to retain our subscribers and
attract new subscribers by offering them advanced handsets,
handset upgrades, attractive calling plans and value-added
services. In 2006, we introduced a churn lab that
identifies subscribers at high risk of churn and seeks to
preemptively approach them with tailored solutions to maintain
their satisfaction with our services. |
|
|
|
Grow and develop our Internet, content and data services.
The usage of cellular content and data services in Israel is
currently relatively low compared to western European countries
and we believe that we have significant growth potential in this
field. We intend |
73
|
|
|
|
|
to continue to invest in the deployment of our high speed UMTS/
HSDPA network, which covered 80% of the populated territory of
Israel at the end of 2006, in order to permit higher-quality and
higher-speed multimedia content transmission. We also plan to
expand our content and data services, products and capabilities
through in-house expertise and strategic relationships with
leading cellular content providers. For example, in 2006 we
introduced Cellcom Heep, a Web 2.0 portal that
permits cellular and PC users to upload, review and rate
user-generated content and in 2004 we introduced our
Cellcom Volume initiative that featured, among other
things, the introduction of our cellular music portal. |
|
|
|
Grow roaming revenues. We have experienced steady growth
in roaming revenues since 2003 and believe that roaming presents
an important source of future revenue and profit growth for us.
We currently have GSM roaming agreements with over 450 operators
in 167 countries, of which 45 operators in 27 countries are
also 3G operators, and we aim to increase our number of
relationships. In particular, we intend to pursue additional
agreements with 3G operators, allowing our and their subscribers
to benefit from advanced content and data services when
traveling. |
|
|
|
Further develop and strengthen the Cellcom brand.
External market surveys that we have commissioned indicate that
brand recognition has become an increasingly important factor in
subscriber selection of, and loyalty to, a cellular operator.
Due to our extensive efforts in the past few years, we believe
that we have established the Cellcom brand as one of the most
recognized and respected consumer brands in Israel. We plan to
continually enhance our brand through maintaining our high
network quality, the provision of innovative products and
services, quality customer service and investments in
advertising and promotional campaigns. We believe these
enhancements are key to maintaining our competitive advantage,
differentiating our services from those of our competitors and
establishing and maintaining a successful relationship with our
subscribers. |
|
|
|
Optimize our cost structure. We intend to continue our
efforts to control costs so that we can improve profitability
while also improving the quality of our services. For example,
from September 2005 to September 2006, we have reduced our
non-customer facing positions by over 16%, including higher-cost
temporary workers, while increasing our customer-facing
positions. In addition, having already built our own fiber-optic
and microwave infrastructure reduces our operating cash costs,
as our network maintenance costs and microwave spectrum fees are
lower than the lease costs to rent backhaul capacity from Bezeq.
We intend to continue to focus on identifying further
opportunities to manage our costs without reducing the quality
of our service. |
|
|
|
Capitalize on our existing infrastructure to selectively
provide landline telephony services. Our
1,300 kilometer inland fiber-optic network and our
microwave infrastructure provide us with the ability to offer
cost-efficient landline telecommunications solutions. We hold a
license to operate a landline service in Israel and, since July
2006, we offer our landline telephony service to selected
businesses. |
Services and Products
We provide cellular communications services to approximately
2.83 million subscribers, including basic cellular
telephony services and value-added services as well as handset
sales. Not all services are supported by all handsets or by all
of our networks. In addition, we offer transmission and data
services to business customers and telecommunications operators
and, since July 2006, we have been offering our landline
telephony service to selected businesses.
We offer our cellular subscribers a variety of calling plans,
designed to adapt to their particular characteristics and
changing needs. We adapt our calling plans for the different
types of usage personal or business and
the number of users associated with the subscriber. For example,
we offer discounted rates on the weekend for soldiers, Israeli
music services to youth
74
and discounted rates on calls among members of the same family.
We offer two methods of payment: pre-paid and post-paid.
Pre-paid services are offered to subscribers who pay for our
services prior to obtaining them, usually by purchasing our
Talkman pre-paid cards or virtual
Talkman cards. Post-paid services are offered to subscribers who
are willing to pay for our services through banking and credit
arrangements, such as credit cards and direct debits. Many of
our post-paid subscribers are able to terminate their
relationship with us at any time and some of them do not pay a
monthly fee.
|
|
|
Basic cellular telephony services |
|
|
|
|
|
Our principal service is basic cellular telephony. In addition
we offer many other services with enhancements and additional
features to our basic cellular telephony service. These services
include voice mail, cellular fax, call waiting, call forwarding,
caller identification, conference calling,
Push-and-Talk service (which allows subscribers to
initiate a call with one or more other persons using a
designated button in their handset without having to dial a
number), Talk 2 (two handsets sharing the same
number, thus allowing our subscribers to own both a handset and
a car phone), additional number service (enables our subscribers
to add a second phone number to their handset) and collect call
service (a unique service protected by our U.S. patent). |
|
|
|
We also offer both an outbound roaming service to our
subscribers when traveling outside of Israel and an inbound
roaming to visitors to Israel who can roam into our
network. Roaming allows cellular subscribers, while using their
own cell phone number (and handset, in most cases) and being
billed by their provider, to place and receive calls and text
messages while in the coverage area of a network to which they
do not subscribe. Where available, subscribers can also benefit
from other cellular services such as advanced data and content
services. As of September 30, 2006, we had commercial
roaming relationships with over 450 operators in 167
countries based on the standard agreements of the GSM
organization (an umbrella organization in which all the cellular
operators operating with GSM technology are members). This
enables our subscribers to enjoy our services in almost the
entire world. Most of our GSM subscribers who use these roaming
services abroad can use their own handset and others can borrow
or rent, depending upon the period of time, a suitable handset
from us. In addition, as of September 30, 2006, we had 3G
roaming arrangements with 45 of these operators, enabling our 3G
roamers to participate in video calls and use high-speed data,
video and audio content services in 27 countries. Roaming is an
increasingly important revenue stream to us due to the large
inbound tourism industry in Israel and extensive overseas travel
by Israelis. |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to basic cellular telephony services, we offer many
value-added services. Value-added services are important to our
business as they enable us to differentiate ourselves from our
competitors, strengthen our brand and increase subscriber usage,
ARPU and subscriber satisfaction. We offer those services that
we believe are likely to be popular with subscribers and benefit
our business. Some of the value-added services that we offer are
available only to subscribers who have supporting handset
models. The principal advanced value-added services that we
currently offer, some of which are exclusive to us, are: |
|
|
|
Cellcom Volume. This music-related marketing initiative
is focused not just on providing a rich downloadable content
consisting of ringtones, video tones, true tones and songs in
MP3 format through our popular cellular music portal, but also
on promoting Israeli music and local musicians and supporting
youth music centers. In addition, handsets supporting music
content, as well as other merchandising, are marketed under |
75
|
|
|
the Cellcom Volume service. Complementary services
provided through Cellcom Volume include Fun Dial,
which enables our subscribers to have callers listen to our
subscribers favorite music instead of the regular ringing
tone while waiting to be connected, and Gift Song,
which enables subscribers to send songs to friends with a
personally recorded introduction. |
|
|
Cellcom Heep. This innovative portal enables our
subscribers and other cellular and landline Internet users to
upload, review and rate user-generated content by using Web 2.0
technology. |
|
|
SMS and MMS services. These messaging services enable
subscribers to send and receive text (SMS), photos, multimedia
and animation (MMS) messages. Additional applications
enable our subscribers to send SMS messages to a large number of
handsets simultaneously. |
|
|
Cellcom i-mode. This is a cellular Internet service
developed by NTT DoCoMo, a Japanese operator and developer of
sophisticated cellular multimedia technology, that enables our
subscribers with designated handsets to obtain information and
content from designated Internet sites in a friendly,
easy-to-use manner. |
|
|
Access to third party application providers. We provide
our subscribers with access to certain services offered by third
party application providers. These services include: a service
that allows subscribers to receive notification of roadway speed
detectors in their vicinity; a service (using a cellular modem)
that provides a comprehensive system for the management of
vehicle fleets and a service that enables subscribers to
remotely manage and operate time clocks and various controllers
for industrial, agricultural and commercial purposes. |
|
|
Video calls. This service enables our 3G users, using 3G
handsets in our 3G coverage area, to communicate with each other
through video conferences. |
|
|
Zone services. This service provides discounts on airtime
for calls initiated from a specific location, such as a
university campus. Our network identifies the location from
which the call is initiated in order to apply the discounted
rate on the call. |
|
|
Location-based services. We offer a number of
location-based services. Where are you? is a
location-based service that allows one subscriber to locate
another subscriber, subject to the latters prior approval,
such as a parent and child. Cellcom Navigator is a
service provided through a third party that enables our
subscribers to receive real-time travel directions and visual
data regarding their position using global positioning system,
or GPS, technology. |
|
|
Other information and content services. We also provide
other information and content services, some provided directly
by us and some by third party content providers. For example, we
provide voice-based information services through interactive
voice response platforms, or IVR, including interactive
information services and radio and TV programs. We also provide
text-based information services and interactive information
services including news headlines, sports results, and traffic
and weather reports. Some of these services are provided through
our MMS or video-based technologies, and are offered to
subscribers with supporting handsets. |
We have established relationships with content providers to
provide us content for our value-added services, including Logia
Development and Content Management Ltd., to manage and develop
cellular content in Israel exclusively for us. Our agreement
with Logia has a one-year term renewable annually and grants us
an option to acquire 51% of Logias equity or 51% of
Logias cellular content activity for us, at any time
during the term of the agreement. Exercise of
76
the equity option will be at a value to be set by an independent
appraiser whereas exercise of the content option would be at no
cost to us.
We sell a wide selection of handsets designed to meet individual
preferences. Prices of handsets vary based on handset features,
calling plans and special promotions. We offer a variety of
handsets from world-leading brands such as Motorola, Nokia,
Samsung and Sony-Ericsson. All of the handset models we sell
offer Hebrew language displays in addition to English. We are
also required to provide cellular phone services to subscribers
who did not purchase their handsets from us, provided that the
handset model has been approved for use by the Ministry of
Communications. We offer our subscribers an extended handset
warranty for their handsets as well as repair and replacement
services in approximately 40 walk-in centers.
In addition to our cellular services, we provide landline
telephony, transmission and data services, using our 1,300
kilometers of inland fiber-optic infrastructure and
complementary microwave links. We have offered transmission and
data services since 2001. We received a license to offer
landline telephone service in April 2006 and, since July 2006,
have been offering this service to selected businesses.
Network and Technology
Our network has developed over the years since we commenced our
operations in 1994 and we now have dual cellular and landline
capabilities.
Our third generation UMTS/ HSDPA, or high-speed
downlink packet data access, technology, offers full interactive
multimedia capabilities with current data rates of up to 1.5Mbps
on the downlink path and up to 384Kbps on the uplink path. This
network, considered to be a 3/3.5G technology, is a
network that uses the same core as, with its access facilities
in some cases co-located with the cell sites of, our existing
GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network. We expect our UMTS/ HSDPA network to
cover more than 80% of the populated territory in Israel by the
end of 2006. By 2007, this network is expected to enable
transmission of up to 14.4Mbps on the downlink path and up to
1.8Mbps on the uplink path. Moreover, our UMTS/ HSDPA network
supports new types of services that require higher throughput
and lower delay, such as video conferencing.
Our second generation GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE 1800MHz
network allows for voice calls, data transmission and multimedia
services, like video streaming and video live (using the EDGE
technology), although at slower speeds than our UMTS/ HSDPA
network. Our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE technology is an advanced
second-generation technology and considered to be a
2.75G technology. It enables us to deliver
multimedia and services at speed rates that are higher than the
rates offered through regular second generation
digital cellular technology. Packet data rates vary from
50 Kbps to 200 Kbps, depending mainly on handset
capabilities. In addition, in the case of coverage gaps and for
services supported by our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE technology, the
network provides an adequate fallback and capacity relief for
our UMTS/ HSDPA network by means of smart features and network
load sharing. Over 90% of our traffic uses our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE
and UMTS/ HSDPA networks, with substantially all of that traffic
using the GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network.
We also have a separate network using our initial TDMA 850MHz
wireless technology, which is widely used as a second
generation technology in North and South America. Less
than 10% of our traffic uses this network. This technology
supports voice calls and low rate data services
77
known as CSD (circuit switch data) and CDPD (cellular digital
packet data). Our TDMA network, which is based on Nortel
technology, is maintained and operated by our engineers and
technicians. Operating costs for this network are low and we
expect that it will not require additional capital expenditures.
Our transmission network is comprised of 1,300 kilometers of
inland advanced fiber-optic cables that, together with our
microwave infrastructure, enable us to provide our customers
with telephony and high speed and high quality transmission and
data services. Our transmission network is strategically
deployed in order to cover the major portion of Israels
business parks and permits us to provide our own backhaul
services while reducing our need to lease capacity from Bezeq,
the incumbent landline operator in Israel.
We have built an extensive, durable and advanced cellular
network system, enabling us to offer high-quality services to
substantially the entire Israeli populated territory. Since
maintaining a high-quality network is a basic element in our
business strategy, we seek to satisfy quality standards that are
important to our subscribers, such as high voice quality, high
data rate packet sessions, low blocked call rate
(calls that fail because access to the network is not possible
due to insufficient network resources), low dropped
call rate (calls that are involuntarily terminated) and
deep indoor coverage. As a result, we have made substantial
capital expenditures and expect to continue to make capital
expenditures on our network system. As of September 30,
2006, we had invested an aggregate of NIS 7.022 billion
($1.596 billion) on our network infrastructure since our
inception in 1994.
We plan to cover 80% of the populated areas of Israel with our
UMTS/ HSDPA network by the end of 2006. Our UMTS/ HSDPA network
is mostly co-located with our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network. The
suppliers of our UMTS/ HSDPA network are Ericsson Israel (for
the 3G radio access network) and Nokia (for our core network).
Our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network currently covers substantially all
of the Israeli populated territory, and is being continually
expanded to support capacity growth. We are currently
selectively enhancing and expanding our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network,
primarily in urban areas, by adding infrastructure to improve
outdoor and indoor coverage. Our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network was
supplied and is maintained by Nokia Israel.
Our TDMA network, which is based on Nortel technology, is
maintained and operated by our engineers and technicians.
Pursuant to the requirements of our license (as well as the
licenses of the other telephony service providers in Israel),
our network is interconnected, either directly or indirectly, to
the networks of all other telephony service providers in Israel.
Our network monitoring system provides
around-the-clock
surveillance of our entire network. The network operations
center is equipped with sophisticated systems that constantly
monitor the status of all switches and cell sites, identify
failures and dispatch technicians to resolve problems.
Operations support systems are utilized to monitor system
quality and identify devices that fail to meet performance
thresholds. These same platforms generate statistics on system
performance such as dropped calls, blocked calls and handoff
failures. Our network operations center is located in our
Netanya headquarters. In addition, we have a partial duplicate
backup center in Kiryat Gat, located approximately 80 kilometers
south of Netanya.
We have designed our TDMA, GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE and UMTS/ HSDPA
networks in order to provide high quality and reliability well
beyond the requirements set forth in our license while using a
cost-effective design, utilizing shared components for our
networks, where applicable.
78
Our primary objective going forward is to complete the build-out
of our UMTS/ HSDPA network and achieve quality and coverage
parameters similar to those in our other networks. At the same
time we intend to continue to perform extensive optimization
work to provide our subscribers with maximum capability to
support video and other high-bandwidth content.
We continually optimize our entire network in order to meet the
key performance indicators for our services, including dropped
calls, voice quality, accessibility, availability and packet
success rate. We use advanced planning, monitoring and analyzing
tools in order to achieve our performance goals efficiently and
with minimum faults.
The two main indicators that we use to measure network
performance for voice and packet data are the blocked
call rate and the dropped call rate. Our
levels of blocked and dropped calls have always been better than
those required by our license and since we commenced operations
we have steadily improved our rate of both blocked calls and
dropped calls.
Spectrum availability in Israel is limited and is allocated by
the Ministry of Communications through a licensing process. We
have been allocated 2x10 MHz in the 850 MHz frequency
band for our TDMA network, and 2x17 MHz in the
1800 MHz frequency band for our GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE network. In
addition, the Ministry of Communications awarded us 2 x
10 MHz and 1 x 5 MHz in the 1900
2200 MHz frequency band for our UMTS third generation FDD
and TDD spectrums, respectively. Currently, we are not making
use of our TDD spectrum due to the unavailability of equipment
that can support this spectrum. We believe that our available
spectrum is sufficient for our needs.
|
|
|
Cell site construction and licensing |
We construct cell sites based on our strategy to expand the
geographical coverage and improve the quality of our network and
as necessary to replace cell sites that need to be removed. Our
acquisition teams survey the area in order to identify the
optimal location for the construction of a cell site. In urban
areas, this would normally be building rooftops. In rural areas,
masts are usually constructed. Our transmission teams also
identify the best means of connecting the base station to our
network, based on our independent transmission network, either
by physical optical fiber, microwave link or Bezeq landlines.
Once a preferred site has been identified and the exact
equipment configuration for that site decided, we begin the
process of obtaining all necessary consents and permits. The
construction of cell sites requires building permits from local
or regional authorities, or an applicable exemption, as well as
a number of additional permits from governmental and regulatory
authorities, such as construction and operating permits from the
Ministry of Environmental Protection in all cases, permits from
the Civil Aviation Authority in most cases and permits from the
Israeli Defense Forces in some cases. In special circumstances,
additional licenses are required. See Regulatory
Matters Permits for Cell Site Construction.
We entered into an agreement with LM Ericsson Israel Ltd., or
Ericsson Israel, in September 2005 for the purchase of UMTS
radio access network and ancillary products and services. We
committed to purchase maintenance services for five years from
the launch of the system (until 2011). We have an option to
purchase additional maintenance services on an annual basis for
20 years from the launch of the system (until 2026). We
also agreed to purchase from Ericsson at least 60% of the 3G
cell sites that we purchase by September 2010. Under the
agreement, the
79
parties generally have limited liability for direct damages of
up to 40% of the value of the agreement.
We entered into our agreement with Nokia Israel Communications
Ltd., or Nokia Israel, in July 2001 for the purchase of our GSM/
GPRS system. We were also granted an option to purchase GSM 800,
EDGE, UMTS and ancillary systems. In 2002, we exercised our
option to purchase an EDGE system, and in 2005, we purchased a
UMTS core system, under similar terms. We are obligated to
purchase maintenance services from Nokia Israel for five years
from the final acceptance of the GPRS system (until 2007).
Thereafter, Nokia Israel is obligated to offer us maintenance
services for 15 years from final acceptance (until 2017).
Under the agreement, the parties generally have limited
liability for direct damages of up to 10% of the value of the
agreement.
We use Telcordias intelligent platform, or IN,
to provide services to our TDMA, GSM/ GPRS/ EDGE and UMTS
networks, allowing us, at minimal cost, to internally develop
sophisticated services with a short
time-to-market that are
customized to local market requirements. We have also deployed
Comverses Intelligent Peripheral, which enables us to
develop services with rich voice interaction, such as Caller
Name Announcement, Call Back and Fun Dial. Our IN platform
supports all existing IN protocols, which allows us to provide
(subject to applicable roaming agreements) advanced roaming
services, including Virtual Home Environment, abbreviated
dialing, unified access to voice mail, VPN, local number format
from subscribers phone book and call screening.
In addition, we have agreements with several Israeli engineering
companies for the construction of our cell sites. We also
purchase certain network components from other suppliers.
Our transmission network provides us with landline connectivity
for our cellular and landline network in substantially all of
the populated territory of Israel. It is based on our
fiber-optic network and complementary microwave infrastructure.
Our transmission network includes links to our internal network
and to our landline and transmission subscribers.
Our optical transmission network is deployed from Nahariya in
the north to Beer Sheva in the south and Afula and Jerusalem in
the east. The fiber-optic network reaches most of the business
parks in the country and is monitored by a fault-management
system that performs real-time monitoring in order to enable us
to provide our subscribers with high quality service. In order
to efficiently complete our transmission networks coverage
to the entire country, we use a microwave network as a
complementary solution in those areas that are not served by our
fiber-optic network. As of September 30, 2006, we had
deployed more than 1,900 microwave links to both our cell
sites and subscribers.
To supplement our transmission network, we lease a limited
amount of transmission capacity from Bezeq, the incumbent
landline operator.
We maintain a variety of information systems that enable us to
deliver superior customer service while enhancing our internal
processes.
We use Amdocs customer care and billing system. We entered
into our agreement with Amdocs (UK) Limited, or Amdocs UK,
in February 1999 for the supply of a central computer system for
customer care, billing and collection capable of generating
customer profiles based on various usage patterns. This system
is based on Amdocs UKs generic pricing system and is
customized to our specific requirements. We own the intellectual
property rights for the customized developments. We currently
purchase maintenance services for the generic system
80
from Amdocs UK and ongoing support services from its affiliate,
Amdocs (Israel) Limited. Amdocs (UK) is obligated to offer
us maintenance services until May 2011. Under the agreement, the
parties current liability for direct damages is limited to
$500,000.
We use Nortels CTI system for the management of incoming
calls to our telephonic call centers.
Our customer care system presents our customer care employees
with a dashboard that displays a subscribers
profile based on various usage patterns. This enables us to
provide a service based upon information for that particular
subscriber.
We use ERP solutions by SAP. We use a data warehouse based on an
Oracle data base system and data mining and reports generated by
Informatica and Cognos. The data warehouse contains data on our
subscribers use and allows for various analytical
segmentation of the data.
Sales and Marketing
As part of our strategy to fully penetrate every part of the
Israeli market, we are committed to making the purchase of our
services as easy and as accessible as possible. We offer calling
plans, value-added services, handsets, accessories and related
services through a broad network of direct and indirect sales
personnel. We pay our independent dealers commissions on sales,
while our direct, employee sales personnel receive base salaries
plus performance-based bonuses. We focus on subscriber needs and
conduct extensive market surveys in order to identify
subscribers preferences and trends. Based on these
findings, we design special calling plans and promotional
campaigns aimed at attracting new subscribers and enhancing our
ability to provide new services to existing subscribers. Our
calling plans include, from time to time, rebates and other
benefits for handset purchases. Our distribution and sales
efforts for subscribers are conducted primarily through four
channels:
|
|
|
Points of sale. We distribute our products and services
through a broad network of physical points of sale providing us
with nationwide coverage of our existing and potential
subscriber base. |
|
|
We operate directly, using our sales force and service
personnel, approximately 40 physical points of sale and service,
mostly located in shopping centers and other frequently visited
locations to provide our subscribers with easy and convenient
access to our products and services. We record approximately
175,000 subscriber applications per month in our direct points
of sale and service. |
|
|
We also distribute our products and services indirectly through
a chain of dozens of dealers who operate in over 130 points of
sale throughout Israel. Our dealers are compensated for each
sale based on qualitative and quantitative measures. We closely
monitor the quality of service provided to our subscribers by
our dealers. In our efforts to penetrate certain sectors of our
potential subscriber base, we select dealers with proven
expertise in marketing to such sectors. |
|
|
Telephonic sales. Telephonic sales efforts target
existing and potential subscribers who are interested in buying
or upgrading handsets and services. When approached by a
customer, our sales representatives (both in-house and
outsourced) offer such customer a variety of products and
services. |
|
|
Door-to-door
sales. The
door-to-door sales team
is comprised of approximately 350 dealers sales
representatives. All the members of our
door-to-door sales team
go through extensive training by us prior to commencing their
work. We target the
door-to-door
subscribers based on market surveys that we regularly conduct.
All information derived from our market surveys is uploaded into
a database. Once a potential customer is identified, we |
81
|
|
|
contact the potential customer and schedule a meeting with a
member of our
door-to-door sales team. |
|
|
Account managers. Our direct sales force for our business
customers maintains regular, personal contact with our large
accounts, focusing on sales, customer retention and tailor-made
solutions for the specific needs of such customers, including
advanced data services. |
Our marketing activities are based on the principle of focusing
on subscribers characteristics and needs and then adapting
the service packages and prices that we offer to subscribers
based on these characteristics and needs.
From surveys that we conduct from time to time, we learn that
subscribers base their choice of cellular provider primarily on
the following parameters: general brand perception; perceived
price of services and handsets; level of customer service; and
selection of handsets and their compatibility with their needs.
Our marketing activities take into consideration these
parameters and we invest efforts to preserve our subscriber
base, enhance usage and attract new subscribers. We utilize a
system that allows the management of complex
one-to-one marketing
campaigns, such as tailoring our marketing activities to
customers based on their unique profile of needs and usage
patterns, thus improving customer loyalty and increasing ARPU.
Our marketing strategy is focused on our role as facilitators of
interpersonal communication and our ability to foster
relationships between people, as well as a general spirit of
youthful exuberance and the strong local roots of our brand. We
launched a highly successful branding campaign at the end of
2004 and continue to follow this marketing strategy. Our
marketing strategy also emphasizes our personal touch, the
quality of our network and services and our innovation.
In recruiting new subscribers, we are focused on current and
potential high value customers, such as students, and
subscribers who influence family and business purchasing
decisions, such as teenagers and senior executives. We leverage
our extensive interactions with our customers, which we estimate
to be approximately 800,000 unique customer applications per
month, to provide the requested services and also to cross- and
up-sell products and services according to customer needs and
usage trends to increase customer satisfaction, loyalty and
revenues. In addition, we offer loyalty rewards, such as video
subscriptions and tickets to concerts, performances and movies,
from time to time.
We regularly advertise in all forms of media, in promotional
campaigns and in the sponsorship of major entertainment events.
For example, through our music-related Cellcom
Volume marketing initiative, we promote the sale of
music-related services through our cellular music portal, we
promote both Israeli music and local musicians as well as
support youth music centers aimed at enabling underprivileged
youth to discover and develop their musical talents. Our
marketing and branding campaign has been very successful and
highly acclaimed among the Israeli public, and our Cellcom
Volume initiative in particular have provided us with a
high visibility association with music content services. Out of
13 surveys conducted in 2005 by Globes, the leading
Israeli business newspaper, our advertisements were selected as
the most memorable and beloved eight times.
We believe that our strong brand recognition gives us the high
level of market exposure required to help us achieve our
business objectives.
Customer Care
Our customer service unit is our main channel for preserving the
long-term relationship with our subscribers. We focus on
customer retention through the provision of quality service and
customer care. In order to achieve this goal, we systematically
monitor and analyze our
82
subscribers preferences, characteristics and trends by
developing and analyzing sophisticated databases. We then adopt
services that are aimed to respond to subscribers needs
and preferences. In addition, subscribers are encouraged to
subscribe to additional value-added services, such as cellular
Internet and content services, in order to enhance customer
satisfaction and increase ARPU. During 2006, we implemented an
application that provides a customer service representative a
one-screen solution which unifies comprehensive customer data
from our various systems, thus shortening the time required to
provide service and improve service quality. We constantly
review our performance by conducting surveys among our
subscribers in order to ensure their satisfaction with our
services and to improve them as necessary.
In order to better respond to subscribers needs in the
most efficient manner, our customer support and service network
offers several channels for our subscribers:
|
|
|
Call centers. In order to provide quick and efficient
responses to the different needs of our various subscribers, our
call-center services are divided into several sub-centers:
finance; network; international roaming; and data transfer. The
call center services are provided in four languages: Hebrew,
Arabic, English and Russian. We regularly monitor the
performance of our call centers. Based on our internal reviews,
the average waiting time for subscribers who contact our call
center is well under a minute. If calls go unanswered for longer
than our guidelines require, a flashing light is automatically
activated in our corporate headquarters, alerting management to
the delay. We currently operate call centers in four locations
throughout Israel, one of which is outsourced. On average, we
respond to one million calls every month. During peak hours our
call centers have the capability to respond to 700 customer
calls simultaneously. |
|
|
Walk-in centers. We currently operate approximately 40
service and sales centers, covering almost all the populated
areas of Israel. These centers provide a walk-in contact channel
and offer the entire spectrum of services that we provide to our
subscribers and potential subscribers, including handsets and
accessories, sales upgrades, maintenance and other services,
such as finance, calling-plan changes and subscriptions to new
services. These stores are mostly located in central locations,
such as popular shopping malls. Our walk-in centers also provide
our subscribers with onsite express repair services, performed
by highly skilled technicians, a concept rarely seen in most
western European countries. This enables a subscriber to deposit
a handset with our repair lab and receive the repaired handset,
on average, within one hour. If a repair service is expected to
take longer, we provide the subscriber with a substitute handset. |
|
|
Self-services. We provide our subscribers and potential
subscribers with various self-service channels, such as
interactive voice response, or IVR, web-based services and
service using SMS. These channels provide general and specific
information, including calling plans, account balance,
billing-related information and roaming tariffs. They also
provide subscribers information regarding trouble shooting and
handset-operation, and enable subscribers to activate and
deactivate services and to download content. |
|
|
Churn Lab. In 2006, we introduced an innovative
churn lab, aimed at reducing churn. The churn lab is
part of our call center operations. Based on various factors and
analytical tools, we identify and analyze high-quality
subscribers whom we consider to be at a high risk of churn.
Then, in order to retain them, we preemptively approach these
subscribers with specially trained customer care representatives
and offer them solutions previously successfully tested on a
sample group of subscribers with similar characteristics, such
as enhanced services at attractive prices and handset upgrades. |
|
|
Our business sales force and back office personnel also provide
customer care to our business customers. |
83
|
|
|
All of our service channels are monitored and analyzed regularly
in order to assure the quality of our services and to identify
areas where we can improve. |
|
|
Beeri Printers provides our printing supplies and invoices
as well as the distribution, packaging and delivery of invoices
and other mail to the postal service distribution centers. We
entered into an agreement with Beeri Printers
Limited Partnership and with Beeri Technologies
(1977) Ltd., or together Beeri, for printing services
in August 2003. Under the terms of the agreement, we committed
to purchase from Beeri a minimum monthly quantity of
production and distribution services which may be reduced if we
modify our printed invoice delivery policy. The agreement is
valid until 2008. |
Employees
Our ability to achieve our strategic goals largely depends on
our employees. Consequently, we strive to recruit the most
suitable candidates for each position, to give our employees the
best training needed to qualify them for their tasks within our
organization and aim to keep them satisfied while being
productive and efficient. We implement a comprehensive review
system that periodically analyzes our employees
performance in order to improve their performance and in order
to enable us to properly compensate, retain and promote our best
employees.
As of September 30, 2006, we had 3,488 full-time
equivalent employees, as set forth in the table below. Since we
are committed to provide the best service to our subscribers,
more than 75% of our work force is engaged in customer facing
positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Full-Time | |
|
|
Equivalent | |
Unit |
|
Positions | |
|
|
| |
Management and headquarters
|
|
|
31 |
|
Human resources and administration
|
|
|
42 |
|
Marketing
|
|
|
69 |
|
Business customers
|
|
|
331 |
|
Sales and service
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
Operations and supply chain
|
|
|
411 |
|
Finance
|
|
|
115 |
|
Technologies
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
Israeli labor laws govern the length of the workday, minimum
wages for employees, procedures for hiring and dismissing
employees, determination of severance pay, annual leave, sick
days and other conditions of employment. Israeli law generally
requires severance pay upon the retirement or death of an
employee or termination of employment. For those of our
employees who are entitled to a pension arrangement, we fund
future severance pay obligations by contributing to
managers insurance or other pension arrangements in the
amount of 8.3% of the employees wages. We have no unfunded
liability in respect of these employees. A provision in our
financial reports covers severance pay to those employees who
are not entitled to managers insurance or other pension
arrangements. Furthermore, we and our employees are required to
make payments to the National Insurance Institute, which is
similar to the U.S. Social Security Administration. Such
amounts also include payments by the employee for health
insurance. The total payments to the National Insurance
Institute are equal to approximately 17.7% of an employees
wages (up to a specified amount), of which the employee
contributes approximately 12% and the employer contributes
approximately 5.7%.
84
We enter into personal employment agreements with our employees
on either a monthly (in most cases, full-time positions) or
hourly basis. Employment agreements with most of our employees
are at will. Substantially all of our employees have signed
non-disclosure and non-competition agreements, although the
enforceability of non-competition agreements is limited under
Israeli law.
Our employee compensation structure is aimed at encouraging and
supporting employee performance towards enabling us to meet our
strategic goals. Approximately 2,500 of our employees are
entitled to performance-based incentives, which are granted
mainly to customer-facing personnel, such as sales and service
employees. Moreover, substantially all employees, with the
exception of customer service representatives who are eligible
to additional compensation based on individual performance, are
entitled to an annual bonus based on our overall performance,
subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. We
contribute funds on behalf of some of our employees to a
managers insurance fund or other pension arrangement. We
also contribute funds on behalf of some of our employees to an
education fund.
See Management Employee Benefit Plans
for a description of additional employee benefit plans.
We have entered into agreements with a number of manpower
agencies and programming companies under which they provide us
with temporary workers.
Our employees are not represented by any labor union. Since our
inception, we have not experienced labor-related work stoppages
and believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Intellectual Property
We are a member of the GSM Association, together with other
worldwide operators that use GSM technology. As a member of the
association, we are entitled to use its intellectual property
rights, including the GSM logo and trademark.
We have registered approximately 100 trademarks and several
trade names, the most important of which are
Cellcom, Talkman and Cellcom
Volume.
Facilities
In August 2003, we entered into a long-term agreement for the
lease of our headquarters in Netanya, Israel. The leased
property covers approximately 57,800 square meters, of
which approximately 26,000 square meters consist of
underground parking lots. The lease has an initial term of ten
years and is renewable for three additional periods of five
years each, upon our notice.
In November 2001, we were awarded a tender by the Israel Land
Administration, or the ILA, for the development of a plot
covering an area of approximately 74,450 square meters in
Modiin, Israel. At that time, we had plans to establish
our headquarters and logistics center in Modiin, but we
subsequently decided to establish our headquarters in Netanya.
As a result, we failed to comply with our undertakings to the
ILA to complete the development of the plot by November 2004. In
May 2006, we and the ILA signed a leasing agreement for the
plot, for a period of 49 years beginning in November 2001.
Currently, we are seeking to sell our rights in the property to
third parties. Due to our failure to comply with our development
agreement, we may be liable for fines and additional amounts to
the ILA, but we do not anticipate that those amounts would be
material.
85
|
|
|
Service centers, points of sale and cell sites |
We currently lease approximately 40 service centers, points of
sale and other facilities, which are used for marketing, sales
and customer service. Lease agreements for our retail stores and
service centers are generally for periods of two to three years,
with extension options that vary by location.
In addition, we lease from various parties, including the ILA,
municipalities and private entities sites for the establishment,
maintenance and operation of cell sites for our cellular network.
The duration of these lease agreements varies and ranges, in
most cases, from two to six years, with an option to extend the
lease for successive similar periods. The lease agreements also
differ from each other in aspects such as payment terms and exit
windows that enable us to terminate the agreement prior to its
scheduled expiration. In some of the agreements, the lessor is
entitled to terminate the agreement at any time without cause,
subject to prior notice. Based on our past experience, we
encounter difficulties in extending the term of approximately 3%
to 5% of the lease agreements for cell sites, which at times
results in our having to pay substantially higher rent in order
to remain in the same locations or to find alternative sites.
|
|
|
Authorization agreement with land regulatory
authorities |
In October 2005, we entered into an authorization agreement with
the ILA (which manages the lands of the Development Authority
and the Jewish National Fund) that authorizes us to use lands
managed by the ILA for the establishment and operation of cell
sites. The authorization agreement is effective for a term of
five years commencing January 1, 2004.
The authorization agreement provides that subject to the receipt
of approval from the ILA, we will be entitled to establish and
operate cell sites on the lands leased to third parties
throughout the agreements term. In connection with the
authorization agreement we undertook to vacate at the end of the
agreements term all facilities installed in the authorized
area unless the authorization period is extended.
Under the authorization agreement, the ILA is entitled to revoke
authorizations granted to us in the event of changes in the
designation of the land on which a cell site was erected, in the
event that we violate a fundamental condition of the
authorization agreement, in the event that the holders of rights
in the properties on which we erected cell sites breach the
agreements between them and the ILA and in the event that the
land on which a cell site was erected is required for public use.
Competition
There is substantial competition in all aspects of the cellular
communications market in Israel and we expect this to continue
in the future due to the highly penetrated state of our market.
We compete for market and revenue share with three other
cellular communication operators: Partner, which is majority
owned by Hutchison Whampoa; Pelephone, which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of the incumbent landline provider, Bezeq; and MIRS,
which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Motorola.
Our estimated market share based on number of subscribers was
34.4% as of September 30, 2006. To our knowledge, the
market shares at such time of Partner, Pelephone and MIRS were
estimated to be approximately 31.9%, 28.7% and 5%, respectively.
Since MIRS does not publish data on its number of subscribers,
estimates of its market share are based on surveys.
The competition in our market is expected to increase further as
a result of the implementation of number portability, which is
likely to occur during 2007, as it will remove a deterrent to
switching providers. In addition, subject to policy formation by
the regulator, mobile
86
virtual network operators may enter into agreements with
cellular providers and enter into the market, increasing the
competition. We may also face competition in the future from
other providers of voice and data communications, including
service providers that may offer WiMAX or WiFi wireless high
speed data access.
We believe that the principal competitive factors include
general brand perception, perceived price, customer service, and
handset selection. In addition, content and other value-added
services constitute a potential growth engine for increasing
revenues from subscribers and are also an important factor in
selecting a cellular provider.
In response to the enhanced competition in our market, we have
implemented various steps and strategies, including:
|
|
|
|
|
marketing and branding campaigns aimed at enhancing market
leadership, perceived value, brand recognition and loyalty among
our existing and potential subscriber base; |
|
|
|
investing resources in improving customer service and retention,
as well as supporting information technology systems; |
|
|
|
introducing innovative value-added services and identifying
popular niches among various subscriber groups; |
|
|
|
investing in improving our network technology to ensure our
ability to offer quality services and advanced services; |
|
|
|
using innovative sales campaigns for attracting new subscribers
by offering subsidies on handsets to new subscribers such as
1+1 (buy one, get one free) campaigns; and |
|
|
|
offering attractive calling plans to subscribers, adapted to
their needs and preferences. |
Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our
ability to anticipate and respond to trends and events affecting
the industry, including: the introduction of new services and
technologies, changes in consumer preferences, demographic
trends, economic conditions, pricing strategies of competitors
and changes to the legal and regulatory environment. We believe
that we are well positioned for the competition in our market.
Legal Proceedings
We are served from time to time with claims concerning various
matters, including disputes with customers, commercial disputes
with third parties with whom we do business and disputes with
government entities, including local planning and building
committees and the Ministry of Communications. The disputes with
customers include: purported class actions regarding claims such
as alleged overcharging of tariffs and interconnection fees,
misleading representation, illegal rounding of tariffs and call
units, providing services not in compliance with our
licenses requirements or with a subscribers
agreement. The following is a summary of our material litigation.
Two recent legislative changes, the adoption of the
Class Actions Law and the 2005 amendment to the Consumer
Protection Law, include provisions that expand the causes of
action for which a class of litigants may bring suit, including
with regard to damages incurred prior to the effective dates of
the law and the amendment reducing the minimal requirements for
certification of a class action suit and broadening and
loosening the qualifications to be the leading plaintiff in a
class action lawsuit. These laws may increase the number of
requests for certification of class action lawsuits against us
and may increase our legal exposure as a result of such class
action lawsuits and our legal costs in defending against such
suits. See Risk Factors We are exposed to, and
currently are engaged in, a variety of legal proceedings,
including class action lawsuits.
87
All amounts noted below are nominal and, in cases where the
claim is approved, will be adjusted to reflect changes in the
Israeli CPI and statutory interest, from the date that each
claim was filed.
In September 2000, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by
one of our subscribers in connection with VAT charges in respect
of insurance premiums and the provision of insurance services
that were allegedly not provided in accordance with the law. If
the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the amount of the
claim is estimated by the plaintiff to be
NIS 402 million. In February 2006, the motion for
certification as a class action was denied. In March 2006, an
appeal was filed with the Supreme Court challenging the
dismissal. Based on advice of counsel, we believe that we have
good defenses against the appeal. Accordingly, no provision has
been included in our financial statements in respect of this
claim.
In August 2001, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by
one of our subscribers in connection with our outgoing call
tariffs on the Talkman (pre-paid) plan and the
collection of a distribution fee for Talkman calling
cards. If the claim is certified as a class action, the amount
claimed is estimated by the plaintiff to be NIS
135 million. In June 2004, the motion for certification as
a class action was denied. In September 2004, this decision was
appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court. Based on advice of
counsel, we believe that we have good defenses against the
appeal. Accordingly, no provision has been included in our
financial statements in respect of this claim.
In August 2001, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by
one of our subscribers in connection with air time tariffs and
subscriber fees that were allegedly collected not in accordance
with the language of the agreement signed by our subscribers at
the time of their joining our network. If the lawsuit is
certified as a class action, the amount claimed is estimated by
the plaintiff to be NIS 1.26 billion, plus punitive damages
at a rate of not less than 100% of the amount of the judgment.
In February 2004, the motion for certification as a class action
was denied. In March 2004, this decision was appealed to the
Israeli Supreme Court. In January 2006, the Supreme Court
approved the plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint to
reflect the amendment to the Consumer Protection Law and return
to the District Court in order to examine the amendments
effect, if any, on the District Court ruling, which remains in
effect. In October 2006, a separate motion was granted allowing
the plaintiff to further revise his complaint as a result of
enactment of the Class Action Claims Law. Based on advice
of counsel, we believe we have good arguments against the
certification of the lawsuit as a class action but due to the
procedural irregularities demonstrated in the conduct of this
lawsuit, it is difficult to assess, at this stage, prior to
deliberation, the certifications chances of success.
However, based on advice of counsel, we believe the likelihood
of certification of the lawsuit as a class action to be not
probable. Accordingly, no provision has been included in our
financial statements in respect of this claim.
In December 2002, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against Pelephone and us in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa in
connection with our incoming call tariff to subscribers of other
operators when calling our subscribers during the period before
the regulation of interconnect fees. If the lawsuit is certified
as a class action, the amount claimed is estimated by the
plaintiff to be NIS 1.6 billion. Based on advice of
counsel, we believe that we have good defenses against the
certification of the lawsuit as a class action. Accordingly, no
provision has been included in our financial statements in
respect of this claim.
In April 2003, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against Partner, Pelephone and us with the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa in connection with our incoming SMS tariff
to subscribers of other operators when sending SMS messages to
our subscribers during the period before the
88
regulation of SMS interconnect fees. If the lawsuit is certified
as a class action, the amount claimed is estimated by the
plaintiff to be NIS 90 million, without specifying the
amount claimed from us. Based on advice of counsel, we believe
that we have good defenses against the certification of the
lawsuit as a class action. Accordingly, no provision was
included in our financial statements in respect of this claim.
In August 2003, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by
one of our subscribers in connection with our method of rounding
the rates of calls, our method of linking rates of calls to the
consumer price index and a certain rate that was approved by the
Ministry of Communications in 1996 was illegally approved. If
the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the amount claimed
is estimated by the plaintiff to be NIS 150 million.
Following the amendment to the Consumer Protection Law in
December 2005, the plaintiff filed an amended statement of its
claim in March 2006. No hearing has as yet been held on the
merits of that motion. Based on advice of counsel, we believe
that we have good defenses against the certification of the
lawsuit as a class action. Accordingly, no provision has been
included in our financial statements in respect of this claim.
In August 2006, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us and two other cellular operators in the District
Court of Tel-AvivJaffa by one of our subscribers in
connection with sums allegedly unlawfully charged for a segment
of a call that was not actually carried out. If the lawsuit is
certified as a class action, the total amount claimed is
estimated by the plaintiffs as exceeding NIS 100 million
without specifying the amount claimed from us individually. At
this preliminary stage, and due to the circumstances described
below in relation to an additional lawsuit filed against us in
November 2006, we are unable to assess the lawsuits
chances of success. Accordingly, no provision has been made in
our financial statements in respect of this claim.
In November 2006, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us, two other cellular operators and two landline
operators in the District Court of Tel-AvivJaffa by four
plaintiffs claiming to be subscribers of the three cellular
operators, in connection with sums allegedly unlawfully charged
for a segment of a call that was not actually carried out. If
the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the total amount
claimed from us, as well as from each of the other cellular
operators, is estimated by the plaintiffs to be approximately
NIS 53 million (the amount claimed from all five
operators is estimated by the plaintiffs to be approximately
NIS 159 million). In November 2006, we filed a motion
to transfer this lawsuit to the judge handling the lawsuit filed
in August 2006, mentioned above, and seeking further
instructions from this judge as to the manner in which the two
purported class actions should be heard, on the basis of the
similarity of the two lawsuits. At this preliminary stage, and
given the circumstances just described, we are unable to assess
the lawsuits chances of success. Accordingly, no provision
has been made in our financial statements in respect of this
claim.
In January 2007, a purported class action lawsuit was filed
against us, two other cellular operators and two landline
operators in the District Court of Jerusalem by three plaintiffs
claiming to be subscribers of some of the defendants, in
connection with an alleged violation of the defendants
statutory duty to allow their subscribers to transfer with their
number to another operator, thus, allegedly, causing monetary
damage to the subscribers. If the lawsuit is certified as a
class action, the total amount claimed is estimated by the
plaintiffs to be at least NIS 10.6 billion, without
specifying the amount claimed from us and subject to increase in
as much as the alleged violation is prolonged. The amount of
damages alleged by the plaintiffs is at least NIS 1000 per
subscriber (the plaintiffs are alleging that the damage for
business customers is at least double the amount and are
maintaining the right to increase the claim accordingly), and we
have been attributed 2.82 million subscribers in the
claim.At this preliminary stage, we are unable to assess the
lawsuits chances of success. Accordingly, no provision has
been made in our financial statements in respect of this claim.
However, we believe that the claim does not provide a relevant
basis for the amount of monetary damages requested.
89
|
|
|
Commercial and other disputes |
In April 2005, a lawsuit was filed against us in the District
Court of Tel-AvivJaffa by one of our former dealers and
importers for the amount of NIS 28 million (reduced for
court fee purposes from approximately NIS 38 million),
alleging that we have breached an agreement between the parties.
Based on advice of counsel, we believe that we have good defense
against such claim. Accordingly, no provision has been made in
our financial statements in respect of this claim.
In January 2007, a lawsuit was filed against us in an
arbitration proceeding for the amount of approximately NIS
35 million by a company that purchased cellular services
from us in order to sell the services to its customers,
alleging, among other things, that we have breached agreements
between the parties and making claims concerning our conduct. We
reject all claims made by the company against us. However, at
this preliminary stage we are unable to assess the
lawsuits chances of success. Accordingly, no provision has
been made in our financial statements in respect of this claim.
There is a dispute between the Ministry of Communications and us
with respect to the payment of fees for GSM and UMTS
frequencies. The amount in dispute as of September 30, 2006
is approximately NIS 56 million. Until a final
decision on this matter, we deposited about half of this amount
with the Ministry of Communications. Based on advice of counsel,
we believe that the method we apply is the lawful method.
Accordingly, no provision was included in our financial
statements in respect of the amount in dispute, including the
amount we deposited. We have applied to the courts regarding
this issue.
In a small number of instances, local planning and building
committees that were sued for depreciated property values in
accordance with Section 197 of the Planning and Building
Law have attempted to join cellular operators as defendants to
the claims, including us, despite the fact that the cellular
operators (including us) in such cases did not submit
indemnification letters to such planning and building
committees. Based on advice of counsel, we believe that we have
good defenses against such claims. Accordingly, no provision has
been included in our financial statements in respect of such
claims.
90
REGULATORY MATTERS
The following is a description of various regulatory matters
which are material to our operations, including certain future
legislative initiatives which are in the process of being
enacted. There is no certainty that the future legislation
described here will be enacted or whether it will be subject to
further change before its final enactment.
General
A significant part of our operations is regulated by the Israeli
Communications Law, 1982, the regulations promulgated under the
Communications Law and the provisions of our licenses, which
were granted by the Israeli Ministry of Communications pursuant
to the Communications Law. We are required by law to have a
general license in order to provide cellular communications
services in Israel. The Ministry of Communications has broad
supervisory powers in connection with the operations of license
holders and is authorized, among other things, to impose
financial penalties for violations of the Communications Law and
our license.
Our Principal License
The establishment and operation of a cellular communications
network requires a license pursuant to the Communications Law
for telecommunications operations and services and pursuant to
the Israeli Wireless Telegraph Ordinance (New Version), 1972,
for the allocation of spectrum and installation and operation of
a cellular network.
We provide our cellular services under a non-exclusive general
license granted to us by the Ministry of Communications in June
1994, which requires us to provide cellular services in the
State of Israel to anyone wishing to subscribe. The license
expires on January 31, 2022, but may be extended by the
Ministry of Communications for successive periods of six years,
provided that we have complied with the license and applicable
law, have continuously invested in the improvement of our
service and network and have demonstrated the ability to
continue to do so in the future. The main provisions of the
license are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The license may be modified, cancelled, conditioned or
restricted by the Ministry of Communications in certain
instances, including: if required to ensure the level of
services we provide; if a breach of a material term of the
license occurs; if DIC (or a transferee or transferees, if
approved by the Ministry of Communications), in its capacity as
our founding shareholder, holds, directly or indirectly, less
than 26% of our means of control; if our founding shareholders
who are Israeli citizens and residents (the Ministry of
Communications has informed us that it is considering certain
amendments to our license in relation to the Israeli holding
requirement, such as to impose a minimum holding requirement on
individual Israeli persons in connection with this requirement;
based on conversations to date, we do not expect this change to
have a material impact on us) hold, directly or indirectly, less
than 20% of our means of control (DIC, as founding shareholder,
has undertaken to comply with this condition); if at least 20%
of our directors are not appointed by Israeli citizens and
residents from among our founding shareholders or if less than a
majority of our directors are Israeli citizens and residents; if
any of our managers or directors is convicted of a crime of
moral turpitude and continues to serve; if we commit an act or
omission that adversely affects or limits competition in the
cellular communications market; or if we and our 10% or greater
shareholders fail to maintain combined shareholders equity
of at least $200 million. For the purpose of the license,
means of control is defined as voting rights, the
right to appoint a director or general manager, the right to
participate in distributions, or the right to participate in
distributions upon liquidation; |
|
|
|
It is prohibited to acquire (alone or together with relatives or
with other parties who collaborate on a regular basis) or
transfer our shares, directly or indirectly (including a |
91
|
|
|
|
|
transfer by way of foreclosing on a pledge), in one transaction
or a series of transactions, if such acquisition or transfer
will result in a holding or transfer of 10% or more of any of
our means of control, or to transfer any of our means of control
if as a result of such transfer, control over our company will
be transferred from one party to another, without the prior
approval of the Ministry of Communications. For the purpose of
the license, control is defined as the direct or
indirect ability to direct our operations whether this ability
arises from our articles of association, from written or oral
agreement or from holding any means of control or otherwise,
other than from holding the position of director or officer; |
|
|
|
It is prohibited for any of our office holders or anyone holding
more than 5% of our means of control, to hold, directly or
indirectly, more than 5% of the means of control in Bezeq or
another cellular operator in Israel, or, for any of the
foregoing to serve as an office holder of one of our
competitors, subject to certain exceptions requiring the prior
approval of the Ministry of Communications; |
|
|
|
We, our office holders or interested parties may not be parties
to any arrangement whatsoever with Bezeq or another cellular
operator that is intended or is likely to restrict or harm
competition in the field of cellular services, cellular handsets
or other cellular services. For the purpose of the license, an
interested party is defined as a 5% or greater
holder of any means of control; |
|
|
|
We are subject to the guidelines of Israels General
Security Services, which may include requirements that certain
office holders and holders of certain other positions be Israeli
citizens and residents with security clearance. For example, our
Board of Directors is required to appoint a committee to deal
with matters concerning state security. Only directors who have
the requisite security clearance by Israels General
Security Services may be members of this committee. In addition,
the Minister of Communications is entitled under our license to
appoint a state employee with security clearance to act as an
observer in all meetings of our Board of Directors and its
committees; |
|
|
|
During the entire period of operation under the license, we are
required to have agreements with a manufacturer of cellular
network equipment which must include, among other things, a
know-how agreement and an agreement guaranteeing the supply of
spare parts for our network equipment for a period of at least
seven years; |
|
|
|
We are required to interconnect our network to other public
telecommunications networks in Israel, on equal terms and
without discrimination, in order to enable subscribers of all
operators to communicate with one another; |
|
|
|
We may not give preference in providing infrastructure services
to a license holder that is an affiliated company over other
license holders, whether in payment for services, conditions or
availability of services or in any other manner, other than in
specific circumstances and subject to the approval of the
Ministry of Communications; |
|
|
|
The license sets forth the general types of payments that we may
collect from our subscribers, the general mechanisms for setting
tariffs, the reports that we must submit to the Ministry of
Communications and the obligation to provide notice to the
Ministry of Communications prior to changing tariffs. The
Ministry of Communications is authorized to intervene in setting
tariffs in certain instances; |
|
|
|
The license requires us to maintain a minimum standard of
customer service, including, among other things, establishing
call centers and service centers, maintaining a certain service
level of our network, collecting payments pursuant to a certain
procedure and protecting the privacy of subscribers; |
92
|
|
|
|
|
The license or any part thereof may not be transferred, pledged
or encumbered without the prior approval of the Ministry of
Communications. The license also sets forth restrictions on the
sale, lease or pledge of any assets used for implementing the
license; |
|
|
|
We are required to obtain insurance coverage for our cellular
activities. In addition, the license imposes statutory liability
for any loss or damage caused to a third party as a result of
establishing, sustaining, maintaining or operating our cellular
network. We have further undertaken to indemnify the State of
Israel for any monetary obligation imposed on the State of
Israel in the event of such loss or damage. For the purpose of
guaranteeing our obligations under the license, we have
deposited a bank guarantee in the amount of $10 million
with the Ministry of Communications, which may be forfeited in
the event that we violate the terms of our license. |
In 2005, our license was amended to regulate charging for SMS
messages sent outside our network, which, under a certain
interpretation of the amendment, may lead to claims of our not
being in compliance with our license. To date, we have fulfilled
the license requirements with respect to SMS messages sent to
subscribers of one other cellular operator. However, due to
technological difficulties which have not yet been resolved, we
may face claims, if such interpretation of the amendment
prevails, of not having implemented the amendment with respect
to SMS messages sent to subscribers of two other operators. We
had notified the Ministry of Communications of our technological
inability to fully implement the amendment, in light of this
interpretation. The Ministry of Communications had proposed an
amendment to our license to resolve this problem, which we
believe is unsatisfactory.
In the event that we violate the terms of our license, we may be
subject to substantial penalties, including monetary sanctions.
In January 2007, the Israeli parliament approved an increase in
the financial sanctions that may be imposed on us by the
Ministry of Communications for a breach of our licenses.
Following the increase, the maximum amount per violation that
may be imposed is NIS 1.4 million plus 0.25% of our annual
revenue from the preceding year. An additional sanction
amounting to 2% of the original sanction may be imposed for each
day that the violation continues. In addition, the Ministry of
Communications may determine certain service-related terms in
our license as service terms; the maximum monetary
sanctions per violation of a service term shall be
double the amount of any other monetary sanction set in our
license for such a violation per each period of 30 days or
portion thereof during which the violation continues.
Other Licenses
|
|
|
Special general license for the provision of landline
communication services |
In April 2006, Cellcom Fixed Line Communications L.P., or
Cellcom Fixed Line, a limited partnership wholly-owned by us,
was granted a non-exclusive special general license for the
provision of landline telephone communication services. The
license expires in 2026 but may be extended by the Ministry of
Communications for successive periods of 10 years. We began
providing landline telephone services in July 2006,
concentrating on offering landline telephone services to
selected businesses. The partnership deposited a bank guarantee
in the amount of NIS 10 million with the Ministry of
Communications upon receiving the license. The provisions of the
general license described above, including as to its extension,
generally apply to this license, subject to certain
modifications. It should be noted that in addition to any 10%
share transfer requiring the prior approval of the Ministry of
Communications as noted in our general license, the special
general license additionally requires prior approval for
acquiring the ability to effect a significant influence over us.
In this context, holding 25% of our means of control is presumed
to confer significant influence.
In September 2006, the Director General of the Ministry of
Communications was instructed by the government to implement the
operation of landline services over broadband Internet lines by
April 2007. If this process is completed, it will enable us to
penetrate the private sector as
93
well, by offering voice services over the broadband
infrastructure of other operators, should we choose to do so.
|
|
|
Data and transmission license |
In 2000, we were granted a non-exclusive special license for the
provision of local data communication services and high-speed
transmission services, which is effective until November 2007.
Following the grant of a special general license for the
provision of landline telephone communication services to
Cellcom Fixed Line, which also includes the services previously
provided through our data and transmission license, our data and
transmission license was amended in June 2006 to permit only
Cellcom Fixed Line to be our customer of these services (and
these services are now being provided to our customers through
Cellcom Fixed Line). The provisions of the general and general
specific license described above, including as to its extension,
generally apply to this license, subject to certain
modifications.
|
|
|
Cellular services in Judea and Samaria |
The Israeli Civil Administration in Judea and Samaria granted us
a non-exclusive license for the provision of cellular services
to the Israeli-populated areas in Judea and Samaria. This
license is effective until December 31, 2007. The
provisions of the general license described above, including as
to its extension, generally apply to this license, subject to
certain modifications. We believe that we will be able to
receive an extension to this license upon request.
Tariff Supervision
Under the Israeli Communications Regulations (Telecommunications
and Broadcasting) (Payment for Interconnecting), 2000,
interconnect tariffs among landline operators, international
call operators and cellular operators are subject to regulation
and have been gradually decreased, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum interconnect tariff payable by a landline operator
or a cellular operator for the completion of a call on another
cellular network was decreased as of March 1, 2005 from NIS
0.45 to NIS 0.32 per minute; and as of March 2006, to NIS
0.29 per minute. This tariff will be reduced to
NIS 0.26 per minute as of March 1, 2007, and it
will be further reduced to NIS 0.22 per minute as of
March 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
The maximum interconnect tariff payable by an international call
operator for the completion of a call on a cellular network is
NIS 0.25 per minute. This tariff will be reduced to NIS
0.22 per minute as of March 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
The maximum interconnect tariff payable by a cellular operator
for sending an SMS message to another cellular network was
decreased as of March 1, 2005 from NIS 0.285 to NIS
0.05 per message; and as of March 2006, to NIS
0.025 per message. |
These above tariffs do not include value added tax and are
updated in March of each year based on the change in the Israeli
CPI published each January with the Israeli CPI published in
January 2005 in accordance with the regulations.
The reduction of interconnect tariffs by the Ministry of
Communications led to a decrease in our revenues. For
information on the effect on our results of operations, see
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Results of Operations.
Under these regulations and our license, as of January 1,
2009, our basic airtime charging units, including for
interconnect purposes, will be changed from twelve-second units
to one-second units. Under our license, we are also permitted to
offer the subscriber calling plans using alternative airtime
charging units. This change may result in a decrease in our
revenues.
94
In November 2006, the Ministry of Communications amended our
license in a manner that will obligate us, as of January 2007,
to provide, in calls made to our subscribers and directed into
voicemail, an announcement that the call is being directed to
voicemail. Further, we may not charge for a call terminated up
to one second after the announcement is made. This change will
result in a decrease in our revenues.
In 2006, the European Union declared that it is considering
regulating roaming tariffs. To our knowledge, following such
declaration, several operators in Europe agreed to reduce
roaming tariffs among themselves. Recently, the Ministry of
Communications has approached the cellular operators in Israel
with a request for information in order to evaluate the need for
intervention in roaming tariffs. If the Ministry of
Communications decides to intervene in the pricing of roaming
services, this could reduce the revenues we derive from our
roaming services.
Following previous steps taken by the Ministry of Communications
to promote additional end-user equipment sales-channels, the
Ministry is also examining the possibility of limiting our
ability to offer subscribers calling plans linking airtime
rebates or benefits with the purchase of handsets. If such
restrictions are imposed, this may impair our ability to offer
advanced handsets that include value-added features and services
to our subscribers at subsidized prices or in conjunction with
attractive calling plans, which may result in lower revenues
from value-added services and selling handsets.
Permits for Cell Site Construction
In order to provide and improve network coverage to our
subscribers, we depend on cell sites located throughout Israel.
The regulation of cell site construction and operation are
primarily set forth in the National Zoning Plan 36 for
Communications, which was published in May 2002. The
construction of cellular access facilities, which are cell sites
of smaller dimensions, is further regulated in the
Communications Law.
The construction and operation of cell sites are subject to
permits from various government entities and related bodies,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
building permits from the local planning and building committee
or the local licensing authority (if no exemption is available); |
|
|
|
approvals for construction and operation from the commissioner
of environmental radiation of the Ministry of Environmental
Protection; |
|
|
|
permits from the Civil Aviation Authority (in most cases); |
|
|
|
permits from the Israel Defense Forces (in certain
cases); and |
|
|
|
other specific permits necessary where applicable, such as for
cell sites on water towers or agricultural land. |
National Zoning Plan 36 includes guidelines for constructing
cell sites in order to provide cellular broadcasting and
reception communications coverage throughout Israel, while
preventing radiation hazards and minimizing damage to the
environment and landscape. The purpose of these guidelines is to
simplify and streamline the process of cell site construction by
creating a uniform framework for handling building permits.
National Zoning Plan 36 sets forth the considerations that the
planning and building authorities should take into account when
issuing building permits for cell sites. These considerations
include the satisfaction of safety standards meant to protect
the publics health from non-ionizing radiation emitting
from cell sites, minimizing damage to the landscape and
examining the effects of cell sites on their physical
surroundings. National Zoning Plan 36 also determines instances
in which building and planning committees are obligated to
inform the
95
public of requests for building permits prior to their issuance,
so that they may submit objections to the construction of a site
in accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Planning and
Building Law, 1965.
We have experienced difficulties in obtaining some of the
permits and consents required for the construction of cell
sites, especially from local planning and building authorities.
Some of our cell sites are in various stages of receiving
building permits, and in several instances we will be required
to relocate these sites to alternative locations or to demolish
these sites without any suitable alternative. The construction
of a cell site without a building permit (or applicable
exemption) constitutes a violation of the Planning and Building
Law. Violations of the Planning and Building Law are criminal in
nature. The Planning and Building Law contains enforcement
provisions to ensure the removal of illegal sites. There have
been instances in which we received demolition orders or in
which we and certain of our directors, officers and employees
faced criminal charges in connection with cell sites constructed
without a permit. In most of these cases, we were successful in
preventing or delaying the demolition of these sites, through
arrangements with the local municipalities or planning and
building authorities for obtaining the permit, or in other
cases, by relocating to alternate sites. Currently, we are
subject to approximately 32 criminal and administrative legal
proceedings alleging that some of our cell sites were built
without a building permit. As of September 30, 2006,
approximately 10.5% of our cell sites operated without building
permits or applicable exemptions. Although we are in the process
of seeking to obtain building permits or modify our cell sites
in order to satisfy applicable exemptions for a portion of these
sites; we may not be able to obtain or modify them. In addition,
we operate other cell sites in a manner which is not fully
compatible with the building permits issued for them, although
they are covered by permits from the Ministry of Environmental
Protection in respect of their radiation level. In some cases we
will be required to relocate these cell sites to alternative
locations, to reduce capacity coverage or to demolish them
without any suitable alternative.
Based on advice received from our legal advisors and consistent
with judicial authority, we have not requested building permits
under the Planning and Building Law for rooftop radio access
devices. The radio access devices do receive the required
permits from the Ministry of Environmental Protection, but some
local authorities claim that these devices also require building
permits or do not meet other legal requirements. If the courts
determine that building permits are necessary for the
installation of these devices or other legal requirements are
not met, it could have a negative impact on our ability to
obtain environmental permits for these devices and deploy
additional devices, which could negatively affect the extent,
quality and capacity of our network coverage and our ability to
continue to market our products and services effectively.
In addition to cell sites, we provide repeaters (also known as
bi-directional amplifiers) to subscribers seeking a solution to
weak signal reception within specific indoor locations. Based on
advice received from our legal advisors, we have not requested
building permits under the Planning and Building Law for outdoor
rooftop repeaters, which are a small part of the repeaters that
have been installed. It is unclear whether other types of
repeaters require building permits. We are currently in the
process of adjusting some of our repeaters to meet the
parameters of the applicable exemption. Some repeaters require
specific permits and others require a general permit from the
Ministry of Environmental Protection in respect of their
radiation level, and we are required to ensure that each
repeater functions within the parameters of the applicable
general permit. The Israeli courts have not yet addressed the
question of whether building permits are required for the
installation of repeaters. Should it be established that the
installation of repeaters (including those already installed)
requires a building permit, we will perform cost-benefit
analyses to determine whether to apply for permits for existing
repeaters or to remove them and whether to apply for permits for
new repeaters.
96
In addition, we construct and operate microwave sites as part of
our transmission network. The various types of microwave sites
receive permits from the Ministry of Environmental Protection in
respect of their radiation level. Based on advice received from
our legal advisors, we believe that building permits are not
required for the installation of these microwave facilities on
rooftops, and, to the best of our knowledge, this issue has not
yet been considered by the Israeli courts. If courts determine
that building permits are necessary for the installation of
these sites, it could have a negative impact on our ability to
obtain environmental permits for these sites and to deploy
additional microwave sites and could hinder the extent, quality
and capacity of our transmission network coverage and our
ability to continue to market our landline services effectively.
|
|
|
Indemnification obligations |
In January 2006, the Planning and Building Law was amended to
provide that as a condition for issuing a building permit for a
cell site, local building and planning committees shall require
letters of indemnification from cellular operators indemnifying
the committees for possible depreciation claims under
Section 197 of the Planning and Building Law, in accordance
with the directives of the National Planning Council.
Section 197 establishes that a property owner whose
property value has been depreciated as a result of the approval
of a building plan that applies to his property or neighboring
properties may be entitled to compensation from the local
building and planning committee. The National Planning
Councils guidelines issued in January 2006 provide for an
undertaking for full indemnification of the planning and
building committees by the cellular companies, in the form
published by the council. The form allows the indemnifying party
to control the defense of the claim. These guidelines will
remain in effect until replaced by an amendment to National
Zoning Plan 36.
We understand that an amendment to National Zoning Plan 36 is
being prepared, which could, if adopted, make the process of
obtaining building permits for the construction and operation of
cell sites more cumbersome and costly and may delay the future
deployment of our network.
Since January 2006, we have given over thirty five
indemnification letters in order to receive building permits. In
addition, prior to January 2006, we provided three undertakings
to provide an indemnification letter to local planning and
building committees. Local planning and building committees have
sought to join cellular operators, including us, as defendants
in depreciation claims made against them even though
indemnification letters were not provided. We were joined as
defendants in a small number of cases. It is possible that the
joining of cellular operators as defendants to similar claims
will continue notwithstanding the absence of an indemnification
letter. We expect that we will be required to continue to
provide indemnification letters as the process of deploying our
cell sites continues. As a result of the requirement to provide
indemnification letters, we may decide to construct new cell
sites in alternative, less suitable locations, to reduce
capacity coverage or not to construct them at all, should we
determine that the risks associated with providing such
indemnification letters outweigh the benefits derived from
constructing such cell sites, which could impair the quality of
our service in the affected areas.
|
|
|
Construction and operating permits from the commissioner
of environmental radiation |
Under the Israeli Pharmacists Regulations (Radioactive Elements
and their Products), 1980, it is prohibited to construct cell
sites without a permit from the Ministry of Environmental
Protection. The Commissioner of Environmental Radiation is
authorized to issue two types of permits: construction permits,
for cell site construction; and operating permits, for cell site
operation.
These permits contain various conditions that regulate the
construction or operating of cell sites, as the case may be. All
of our cell sites routinely receive both construction and
operating permits from the Commissioner within the applicable
time frames. The Pharmacists Regulations
97
provide that each of the two kinds of permits is valid for one
year from the date of its issuance, or for a shorter period of
time as determined by the Commissioner. We submit annual reports
regarding radiation surveys conducted on our cell sites.
According to the Commissioner, the filing of these reports
automatically renews the permits for additional one-year terms.
Some repeaters require specific permits and others require
general permits from the Commissioner in respect of their
radiation level, and we are required to ensure the repeaters
function within the parameters of their general permit.
Under the Pharmacists Regulations, the Commissioner may issue
orders to take appropriate action should he believe a cell site
or other facility poses a threat to the health or welfare of
individuals, the public or the environment. Failure to comply
with the Pharmacists Regulations, the terms of a permit or the
instructions of the Commissioner can lead to sanctions,
including the revocation or suspension of the permit.
Pursuant to the Non-Ionizing Radiation Law, which will become
effective, for the most part, on January 1, 2007, the
construction and operation of cell sites and other facilities
requires the prior approval of the Ministry of Environmental
Protection. The validity of a construction permit will be for a
period not exceeding three months, unless otherwise extended by
the Commissioner, and the validity of an operating permit will
be for a period of five years. Permits that were issued under
the Pharmacists Regulations will be deemed, for the remainder of
their term, as permits issued under the Radiation Law. An
applicant must first receive a construction permit from the
Commissioner and only then may the applicant receive a building
permit from the planning and building committee. In order to
receive an operating permit from the Commissioner, certain
conditions must be met, such as presenting a building permit or
an exemption.
The Radiation Law also regulates permitted exposure levels,
documentation and reporting requirements, and provisions for
supervision of cell site and other facility operation. The
Radiation Law grants the Commissioner authority to issue
eviction orders if a cell site or other facility operates in
conflict with its permit, and it imposes criminal sanctions on a
company and its directors and officers for violations of the
law. Failure to comply with the Radiation Law or the terms of a
permit can lead to revocation or suspension of the permit.
The draft Non-Ionizing Radiation Regulations published by the
Ministry of Environmental Protection in November 2006 proposes
additional restrictions in relation to the operation of cell
sites and other facilities. If these restrictions are adopted in
their current draft format, they will, among other things, limit
our ability to construct new sites and renew operating permits
for a number of our existing sites, specifically in residential
areas.
Handsets
The Israeli Consumer Protection Regulations (Information
Regarding Non-Ionizing Radiation from Cellular Telephones),
2002, regulate the maximum permitted level of non-ionizing
radiation from end-user cellular equipment that emits
non-ionizing radiation, which mainly refers to cellular phones,
according to the European standard, for testing GSM devices, and
the American standard, for testing TDMA devices. They also
require cellular operators to attach an information leaflet to
each equipment package that includes explanations regarding
non-ionizing radiation, the maximum permitted level of
non-ionizing radiation and the level of radiation of that
specific model of equipment. The Radiation Regulations further
require that such information also be displayed at
points-of-sale, service
centers and on the Internet sites of cellular operators.
Pursuant to procedures published by the Ministry of
Communications at the end of 2005, end-user cellular equipment
must comply with all relevant standards, including specific
absorption rate, or SAR, level standards. We obtain
type-approval from the Ministry of Communications for each
handset model imported or sold by us. We include information
published by the manufacturer regarding SAR levels with all of
our handsets. SAR levels are a measurement of non-ionizing
radiation that is emitted by a hand-held cellular telephone at
its specific rate of absorption by living tissue. SAR tests are
performed by handsets manufacturers on prototypes of each model
handset, not for each and every handset. We do not perform
independent SAR tests
98
for equipment and rely for this purpose on information provided
by the manufacturers. As the manufacturers approvals refer
to a prototype handset, we have no information as to the actual
SAR level of the equipment throughout their lifecycle, including
in the case of equipment repair.
According to these procedures, in the event of equipment repair,
SAR levels must be tested again and if they are not tested, the
repairing entity is required to inform the customer that there
may be changes in the SAR levels by affixing a label to the
equipment. The Ministry of Communications has appointed a
consultant to create guidelines for implementing this procedure.
We and the other cellular operators have met with this
consultant. In August 2006, the consultant submitted his
findings to the Ministry of Communications, but the Ministry of
Communications has not yet issued any guidelines. We are
awaiting the publication of these guidelines before implementing
these requirements.
Obtaining a license for importing or trading in spare parts that
are likely to affect the level of non-ionizing radiation
requires receipt of compliance approvals from the manufacturer
of the parts or from a laboratory authorized by the Ministry of
Communications. To the best of our knowledge, to date no spare
parts manufacturer has provided any cellular operator with such
an approval and no laboratory has been authorized to issue such
approvals by the Ministry of Communications.
Royalties
Under the Communications Law, the Communications Regulations
(Royalties), 2001, and the terms of our general license from the
Ministry of Communications, we are required to pay the State of
Israel royalties equal to 3% of our revenues generated from
telecommunications services, less payments transferred to other
license holders for interconnect fees or roaming services, sale
of handsets and losses from bad debt. The rate of these
royalties has decreased in recent years, from 4.5% in 2002, to
4% in 2003, and to 3.5% in 2004 and 2005. In August 2006, the
royalty rate was reduced to 3%, retroactively from
January 1, 2006 and it will continue to be reduced by
0.5% per year, until reaching a rate of 1%.
Number Portability
In March 2005, an amendment to the Communications Law was
approved requiring the Ministry of Communications to publish a
number portability plan for landline and cellular telephone
operators. Number portability would permit cellular and landline
network subscribers in Israel to change network operators (from
one cellular operator to another and from one landline operator
to another) without having to change their telephone numbers.
The Minister was required to provide instructions for license
holders for the implementation and operation of the plan by
September 1, 2006. For special reasons, the implementation
and operation of the plan may be postponed for a period not to
exceed three months.
In August 2005, the Ministry of Communications published
guidelines for number portability. Since May 2005, the
telecommunications license holders have repeatedly informed the
Ministry of Communications, through a joint forum for number
portability, that they were not prepared to implement the
guidelines on schedule. The Ministry of Communications refused
to take any measures in order to change the date for
implementation of the guidelines.
In August 2006, we, together with Partner and Pelephone, filed a
petition with the Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of
Justice, for the provision of an order against the Government of
Israel and the Ministry of Communications to show cause for
their failure to immediately act in order to initiate an
amendment to the Communications Law postponing the deadline for
the implementation of number portability, since the deadline is
set forth in the Communications Law. Bezeq filed a similar
petition on the same date. The reasons for the petition include
our inability to comply with the guidelines under the current
time schedule since the time schedule was based on number
portability plans implemented abroad and failed to take into
consideration the unique technological environment of the
Israeli cellular market, the more complex requirements set by
99
the Israeli regulator and the absence of a detailed plan, as was
originally contemplated by the law. As a result, all relevant
telecommunications license holders, including us, may face
claims of violation of the Communications Law and of their
general license as of September 1, 2006, without the
ability to comply with the law or their license. Individual
subscribers have sought to intervene in the petition and filed a
class action against us and other cellular and landline
operators based on the alleged failure to comply with these
requirements. See Business Legal
Proceedings Purported class actions. At this
preliminary stage, we are unable to assess the lawsuits
chances of success.
In January 2007, we notified the Ministry of Communications that
we concluded the internal developments required for the
implementation of number portability. We believe that the number
portability plan will be implemented during the second half of
2007, subject to the readiness of the other communications
operators.
Frequency Fees
Frequency allocations for our cellular services are governed by
the Israeli Wireless Telegraph Ordinance (New Version), 1972. We
pay frequency fees to the State of Israel in accordance with the
Israeli Wireless Telegraph Regulations (Licenses, Certificates
and Fees), 1987. We are currently in dispute with the Ministry
of Communications over a sum of NIS 56 million in GSM and
UMTS frequency fees. For further information, see
Business Legal Proceedings.
Mobile Virtual Network Operator
A mobile virtual network operator, or MVNO, is a cellular
operator that does not own its own spectrum and usually does not
have its own network infrastructure. Instead, MVNOs have
business arrangements with existing cellular operators to use
their infrastructure and network for the MVNOs own
customers. In September 2006, the Director General of the
Ministry of Communications and the Budget Commissioner in the
Ministry of Finance were appointed by a governmental committee
to examine the possibility of implementing MVNO operation in
Israel. Their findings and recommendations are expected to be
published in May 2007. If the Ministry of Communications and the
Ministry of Finance take measures to introduce the operation of
MVNOs in the Israeli cellular market, this could increase
competition, which may adversely affect our revenues.
Emergency Situations
We may be subject to certain restrictions and instructions
regarding our activities or provision of services during
national emergencies or for reasons of national security or
public welfare, including taking control of our cellular or land
line networks. Further, the Prime Minister and the Ministry of
Communications may determine that our services are deemed
essential services, in which case we may be subject to further
additional limitations on our business operations.
Reporting Requirements
We are subject to extensive reporting requirements. We are
required to submit to the Ministry of Communications detailed
annual reports with information concerning subscribers, revenues
by service, the number of new subscribers and churn, annual
financial statements and prior notice of tariff increases. In
addition, under our license we may be required by the Ministry
of Communications to file additional reports, such as reports on
complaints, network problems and the development of the network.
100
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information regarding our
directors, executive officers and other key employees as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Ami Erel(2),(3)
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Nochi Dankner(3)
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
Isaac Manor
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
Shay Livnat(2),(3)
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Director |
Raanan Cohen(1),(2)
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Director |
Oren Lieder(1),(2)
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
Avraham Bigger(1)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director |
Rafi Bisker(2)
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director |
Shlomo Waxe(2),(4)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director |
Amos Shapira
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Tal Raz
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Eliezer (Lipa) Ogman
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Chief Technology Officer |
Isaiah Rozenberg
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Vice President of Engineering and Network Operation |
Itamar Bartov
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Vice President of Executive and Regulatory Affairs |
Refael Poran
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President of Business Customers |
Meir Barav
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Vice President of Sales and Services |
Ronit Ben-Basat
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources |
Amos Maor
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Vice President of Operations and Supply Chain |
Adi Cohen
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Vice President of Marketing |
Liat Menahemi-Stadler
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
General Legal Counsel |
Gil Ben-Itzhak
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Controller |
|
|
(1) |
Member of our Audit Committee. |
|
(2) |
Member of our Cost Analysis Committee. |
|
(3) |
Member of our Option Committee. |
|
(4) |
Elected as a member of our Audit Committee effective upon
completion of the offering. |
Ami Erel has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors
since 2005. Mr. Erel has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Discount Investment Corporation Ltd. since
2001. From 1999 to 2001, he served as President of Elron
Electronic Industries Ltd., where he continues to serve as a
member of the board of directors and also served, until
recently, as Chairman of the Board of Directors. From 1997 to
1999, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Bezeq The Israeli Telecommunications Corporation
Ltd. Mr. Erel also serves as Chairman of
Netvision Ltd., and as a member of the board of directors
of Koor Industries Ltd., Makhteshim-Agan Industries Ltd.,
Super-Sol Ltd., Property and Building Corporation Ltd. and other
IDB group companies. Mr. Erel has served as the chairman of
the executive committee of the Manufacturers Association of
Israel since 2005. Mr. Erel holds a B.Sc. in electrical
engineering from the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology.
101
Nochi Dankner has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2005. Mr. Dankner currently serves as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IDB Holding Corporation
Ltd. Mr. Dankner also serves as Chairman of IDB Development
Corporation Ltd., Discount Investment Corporation Ltd., Clal
Industries and Investments Ltd., Ganden Holdings Ltd. and
various private companies, and as a member of the board of
directors of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd., Clal Insurance
Enterprises Holdings Ltd., Clal Insurance Company Ltd.,
Super-Sol Ltd., Property and Building Corporation Ltd., American
Israeli Paper Mills Ltd., Koor Industries Ltd., Makhteshim-Agan
Industries Ltd. and various private companies. Mr. Dankner
also serves as the Chairman of the IDB fund For the
Community, as a member of Matan-Your Way to
Give (a non-profit organization), as a member of the
management committee of the Association of Friends of the Tel
Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, and as a member of the board of
trustees of Tel Aviv University. Mr. Dankner holds an
L.L.B. and a B.A. in political science, both from Tel Aviv
University.
Isaac Manor has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2005. Mr. Manor has served as the Deputy
Chairman of the board of directors of IDB Holding Corporation
Ltd. since 2003. From 1976 to 2001, he served as Chief Executive
Officer of companies in the automobile sector of the David
Lubinsky group, the importer of Peugeot and Citroen automobiles
to Israel, where he currently serves as Chairman. Mr. Manor
also serves as a member of the board of directors of IDB
Development Corporation Ltd., Discount Investment Corporation
Ltd., Clal Industries and Investments Ltd., Super-Sol Ltd.,
Property and Building Corporation Ltd., American Israeli Paper
Mills Ltd., Clal Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd., Union Bank
of Israel Ltd., Koor Industries Ltd. and various private
companies. Mr. Manor holds an executive M.B.A. from the
Hebrew University.
Shay Livnat has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2005. Mr. Livnat has served as the Chief
Executive Officer of Zoe Holdings Ltd., a holding company that
manages a diverse portfolio of international telecommunications
operations and hi-tech companies, which was founded by him in
1988, since 2001. From 1988 to 1998, he served as Chief
Executive Officer of Tashtit Ltd. Mr. Livnat also serves as
a member of the board of directors of IDB Development
Corporation Ltd., Clal Industries and Investments Ltd., Clal
Insurance Enterprises Holdings Ltd., Elron Electronic Industries
Ltd. and various private companies. Mr. Livnat serves as a
member of the executive committee of the University of Haifa.
Mr. Livnat holds a B.A. in electrical engineering from
Fairleigh Dickinson University.
Raanan Cohen has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2000. Mr. Cohen has served as Chief
Executive Officer of Koor Industries Ltd. since July 2006. From
2004 to 2006, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Scailex
Corporation Ltd. (formerly Scitex Corporation Ltd.). Since 2001
he has served as Vice President of Discount Investment
Corporation Ltd., having previously served, from 1999 to 2001,
as executive assistant to the chief executive officer of
Discount Investment Corporation Ltd. From 1997 to 1999, he was
an associate at McKinsey & Company Inc., London.
Mr. Cohen also serves as a member of the board of directors
of Makhteshim-Agan Industries Ltd., ECI Telecom Ltd., Property
and Building Corporation Ltd. and various private companies.
Mr. Cohen is a member of the Israeli Bar Association and
holds an L.L.B. and a B.A. in economics from Tel Aviv University
and an M.B.A. in management from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate
School of management of Northwestern University.
Oren Lieder has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2005. Mr. Lieder has served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Discount Investment
Corporation Ltd. since 2003. From 1997 to 2002, he served as the
Chief Financial Officer of Bezeq The Israeli
Telecommunications Corporation Ltd. From 1989 to 1996, he served
as Chief Financial Officer of Zim Israel Navigation Company Ltd.
Mr. Lieder also serves as a member of the board of
directors of Ham-Let (Israel Canada) Ltd., Netvision Ltd.,
Super-Sol Ltd., Property and Building Corporation Ltd., Bayside
Land Corporation Ltd., Globcall Communications Ltd. and various
private companies. Mr. Lieder serves as a member of the
board of trustees and investment committee of the University of
Haifa. Mr. Lieder holds a B.A. in economics and statistics
from the University of Haifa.
102
Avraham Bigger has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2005. Mr. Bigger is the owner and managing
director of three family-owned companies and as of December
2006, is the Chief Executive Officer of Makhteshim-Agan
Industries Ltd. Mr. Bigger also serves as the Chairman of
Super-Sol Ltd., Makhteshim-Agan Industries Ltd. and various
private companies; as the Deputy Chairman of the Caesarea Edmond
Benjamin De Rothschild Foundation and the Caesarea Edmond
Benjamin De Rothschild Development Corporation Ltd.; and as a
member of the board of directors of the First International Bank
of Israel Ltd. and various private companies. Mr. Bigger
holds a B.A. in economics and an M.B.A. from the Hebrew
University.
Rafi Bisker has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2006. Mr. Bisker currently serves as the
Chairman of Property and Building Corporation Ltd., Bayside Land
Corporation Ltd. and various private companies. From 2000 to
2005, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Ganden Holdings
Ltd. From 1989 to 1999, he served as Chief Executive Officer of
Dankner Investments Ltd. Mr. Bisker also serves as a member
of the board of directors of IDB Holding Corporation Ltd., IDB
Development Corporation Ltd., Discount Investment Corporation
Ltd., Clal Industries and Investments Ltd., Super-Sol Ltd.,
Ganden Holdings Ltd., ISPRO The Israel Properties Rental
Corporation Ltd., Mehadrin Ltd., and various private companies.
Mr. Bisker holds a B.Sc. in civil engineering from the
Technion, Israel Institute of Technology.
Shlomo Waxe has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since 2006. Mr. Waxe has served as Director
General of the Israel Association of Electronics and Software
Industries since 2006. From 2002 to 2005, he worked in the field
of communications management and consultancy. From 1999 to 2001,
he served as Chief Executive Officer of Zeevi Communications
Ltd. From 1997 to 1999, he served as a consultant to cellular
communications projects in Sao Paulo, Brazil and in Northeast
Brazil. From 1993 to 1997, he served as the Director General of
Israels Ministry of Communications. From 1990 to 1993, he
served as commanding officer of the signal, electronics and
computer corps of the Israel Defense Forces and he is a retired
brigadier general. Mr. Waxe also serves as a member of the
board of directors of Tambour Ltd., C. Mer Industries Ltd.,
Malam Systems Ltd. and Shrem, Fudim, Kelner
Technologies Ltd. Mr. Waxe holds a B.A. in political
science from the University of Haifa.
Amos Shapira has served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer since 2005. From 2003 to 2005,
Mr. Shapira served as Chief Executive Officer of El Al
Israel Airlines Ltd. From 1993 to 2003, he served as Chief
Executive Officer of Hogla-Kimberly Ltd., a company owned by
Kimberly-Clark USA. He joined the board of directors of Elron
Electronic Industries Ltd. in 2006. Mr. Shapira holds an
M.Sc. in industrial administration from the Technion, Israel
Institute of Technology and a B.A. in economics from the
University of Haifa.
Tal Raz has served as our Chief Financial Officer since
2005. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Raz served as Chief Financial
Officer of Elron Electronic Industries Ltd. From 2001 to 2002,
he served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Elbit
Ltd. From 1997 to 2001, he served as Elbits Chief
Financial Officer, having previously served in the same capacity
at Agentsoft Ltd. and Paul Winston Corporation. Prior to that,
he was a senior auditor at Deloitte & Touches New
York office. Until January 2007, Mr. Raz served as a
director of Netvision Ltd. He is a member of the steering
committee of the Israeli CFO Forum and is a certified public
accountant. He holds a B.A. in accounting and business
administration and an M.B.A. in business administration, from
the City University of New York.
Eliezer (Lipa) Ogman has served as our Chief Technology
Officer since 2000. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Ogman served as
our Vice President of Engineering and Network Operation, and
from 1994 to 1997 he served as manager of our network design
department. Prior to joining us, he served in the signal,
electronics and computer corps of the Israel Defense Forces,
reaching the rank of lieutenant colonel. Mr. Ogman holds a
B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the Technion,
103
Israel Institute of Technology, an M.B.A. in business
administration and an M.Sc. in electrical engineering from Tel
Aviv University.
Isaiah Rozenberg has served as our Vice President of
Engineering and Network Operation since 2005. From 2000 to 2005,
Mr. Rozenberg served as manager of our radio and switch
engineering department. Mr. Rozenberg holds a B.Sc. and an
M.Sc. in electrical and electronics engineering from Ben-Gurion
University of the Negev.
Itamar Bartov has served as our Vice President of
Executive and Regulatory Affairs since 2005. From 2004 to 2005,
Mr. Bartov served as Vice President of Customer Services of
El Al Israel Airlines Ltd., and from 2002 to 2004 he served as
El Als Corporate Secretary. From 2000 to 2002, he served
as the Israel Postal Authoritys Vice President of Business
Development in Overseas Commerce and from 1996 to 2000 he served
as the Israel Postal Authoritys Vice President of Planning
and Control. From 1993 to 1996, he served as senior advisor to
the Minister of Communications. Mr. Bartov holds an L.L.B.
from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
Refael Poran has served as our Vice President of Business
Customers since 2006. From 1992 to 2004, Mr. Poran served
as Chief Executive Officer of Adanet Communications Ltd. From
2005 to 2006, he served as head of the information technology
section of the Haifa Port Company Ltd. Mr. Poran holds a
B.Sc. in electrical engineering from the Technion, Israel
Institute of Technology.
Meir Barav has served as our Vice President of Sales and
Services since 2005. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Barav served as
Vice President of Operations and Logistics of D.B.S. Satellite
Services (1998) Ltd. From 1997 to 2000, he served as Vice
President of Sales and Logistics of Strauss Ice Creams Ltd. and
of Unilever Israel Ltd. Mr. Barav holds a B.A. in economics
and statistics from the Open University.
Ronit Ben-Basat has served as our Vice President of Human
Resources since 2004. From 1999 to 2004, Ms. Ben-Basat
served in various positions for Cisco Systems in Israel, Europe
and San-Jose, California, as a senior human resources manager.
From 1991 to 1999, she served as human resources and finance
manager of LSI Logic. Ms. Ben-Basat holds a B.A. in social
work and an M.Sc. in organizational development management, both
from Tel Aviv University, and she also completed an executive
M.B.A. program at Cisco Systems, through INSEAD, France and IMD,
Switzerland.
Amos Maor has served as our Vice President of Operations
and Supply Chain since 2004. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Maor
served as manager of Supply Chain of Elite Industries Ltd., and
from 2000 to 2002, he served as manager of Elites sales
division headquarters. Mr. Maor holds a B.Sc. in industry
and management engineering from the Technion, Israel Institute
of Technology.
Adi Cohen has served as our Vice President of Marketing
since 2006. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Cohen served as
marketing manager of Super-Sol Ltd. From 2002 to 2003, he served
as Chief Executive Officer of ERN Israel Ltd. From 1998 to 2003,
he served as marketing manager of Partner Communications
Company Ltd. Mr. Cohen holds a B.A. in economics and
an M.B.A., both from the Hebrew University.
Liat Menahemi Stadler has served as our General Legal
Counsel since 2006. From 2000 to 2006, Ms. Menahemi Stadler
served as head of the technology and general purchasing division
of our legal department. She has been a member of our legal
department since 1998. Ms. Menahemi Stadler holds an L.L.B.
and a B.A. in English and French language and literature, both
from the University of Haifa.
Gil Ben-Itzhak has served as our Controller since 2006.
From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Ben-Itzhak served as Chief Financial
Officer of Paul Winston-Eurostar LLC in New York. From 2002 to
2003, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Elron Telesoft
Ltd. and from 1996 to 2002, he served as
104
Controller of Elbit Ltd.
Mr. Ben-Itzhak is
a certified public accountant and holds a B.A. in accounting and
economics from the University of Haifa.
Corporate Governance Practices
We are incorporated in Israel and therefore are subject to
various corporate governance practices under the Israeli
Companies Law, 1999, or the Companies Law, relating to such
matters as external directors, the audit committee and the
internal auditor. These matters are in addition to the
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and other relevant
provisions of U.S. securities laws. Under the New York
Stock Exchange rules, a foreign private issuer may generally
follow its home country rules of corporate governance in lieu of
the comparable New York Stock Exchange requirements, except for
certain matters such as composition and responsibilities of the
audit committee and the independence of its members. We plan to
follow the Companies Law, the relevant provisions of which are
summarized in this prospectus, and to comply with the New York
Stock Exchange requirement to solicit proxies from our
shareholders in respect of each meeting of shareholders. Under
the Companies Law, we are required to appoint at least two
external directors, and this appointment must be ratified by our
shareholders no later than three months after the closing of
this offering. We currently have one independent director under
the rules of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act applicable to audit
committee members, Sholmo Waxe, who will become a member of the
audit committee upon completion of the offering, and we intend
that the two persons we appoint as external directors within
three months of the closing of this offering will also be
independent under the rules of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act applicable
to audit committee members.
In addition, under the Companies Law, our Board of Directors
must determine the minimum number of directors having financial
and accounting expertise, as defined in the regulations, that
our Board of Directors should have. In determining the number of
directors required to have such expertise, the Board of
Directors must consider, among other things, the type and size
of the company and the scope and complexity of its operations.
Our Board of Directors has determined that we require at least
two directors with the requisite financial and accounting
expertise and that Messrs. Dankner, Erel, Lieder, Manor,
Bigger and Cohen have such expertise.
Board of Directors and Officers
Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors. We
intend to appoint two additional directors within three months
of the closing of this offering who will qualify as external
directors under the Companies Law and independent directors
under the rules of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act applicable to audit
committee members. All of our current directors were appointed
by DIC pursuant to its right under our articles of association
to appoint one director for each 8.3% of our voting rights held
by them. Our articles of association were subsequently amended
and currently provide that our directors, apart from external
directors and directors appointed by Israeli citizens and
residents from among our founding shareholders, are elected by a
majority of the voting power represented at a meeting of our
shareholders and voting on the matter. Our articles of
association provide that we must have at least five directors.
Each director (other than external directors and directors
required to be appointed by Israeli citizens and residents from
among our founding shareholders) will hold office until the next
annual general meeting of our shareholders following his or her
election and until his or her successor shall be elected and
qualified. The approval of at least a majority of the voting
rights represented at a general meeting and voting on the matter
is generally required to remove any of our directors from office
(other than external directors and directors required to be
appointed by Israeli citizens and residents from among our
founding shareholders), provided that directors appointed by the
Board of Directors may also be removed by the Board of
Directors. A majority of our shareholders at a general meeting
may elect directors or fill any vacancy, however created, in our
Board of Directors (other than external directors and directors
required to be
105
appointed by Israeli citizens and residents from among our
founding shareholders). In addition, directors, other than an
external director or a director required to be appointed by
Israeli citizens and residents from among our founding
shareholders, may be appointed by a vote of a majority of the
directors then in office.
Our articles of association provide, as allowed by Israeli law,
that any director may, by written notice to us, appoint another
person who is not a director to serve as an alternate director
(subject to the approval of the chairman of the Board of
Directors; and in the case of an appointment made by the
chairman, such appointment shall be valid unless objected to by
the majority of other directors) and may cancel such
appointment. The term of appointment of an alternate director is
unlimited in time and scope unless otherwise specified in the
appointment notice, or until notice is given of the termination
of the appointment. No director currently has appointed any
other person as an alternate director. The Companies Law
stipulates that a person who serves as a director may not serve
as an alternate director except under very limited
circumstances. An alternate director has the same responsibility
as a director.
Each of our executive officers serves at the discretion of our
Board of Directors and holds office until his or her successor
is elected or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or
executive officers.
External Directors
|
|
|
Qualifications of external directors |
Companies incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel
whose shares are listed on a stock exchange are required by the
Companies Law to appoint at least two external directors.
External directors are required to possess professional
qualifications as set out in regulations promulgated under the
Companies Law. The appointment of our external directors must be
ratified (or approved) by our shareholders no later than three
months from the closing of this offering. The Companies Law
provides that a person may not be appointed as an external
director if the person, or the persons relative, partner,
employer or any entity under the persons control, has or
had during the two years preceding the date of appointment any
affiliation with the company or any entity controlling,
controlled by or under common control with the company.
The term affiliation includes:
|
|
|
|
|
an employment relationship; |
|
|
|
a business or professional relationship maintained on a regular
basis; |
|
|
|
control; and |
|
|
|
service as an office holder, excluding service as a director in
a private company prior to its initial public offering if such
director was appointed in order to serve as an external director
following the offering. |
The term office holder is defined in the Companies
Law as a director, general manager, chief business manager,
deputy general manager, vice general manager, any other manager
directly subordinate to the general manager or any other person
assuming the responsibilities of any of the foregoing positions,
without regard to such persons title. Each person listed
above under Directors and Executive
Officers, except Gil Ben-Itzhak, is an office holder for
this purpose.
No person may serve as an external director if the persons
position or other business interests creates, or may create, a
conflict of interest with the persons responsibilities as
a director or may otherwise interfere with the persons
ability to serve as a director. If at the time an external
director is appointed all current members of the board of
directors are of the same gender, then that external director
must be of the other gender.
106
Until the lapse of two years from termination of office, a
company may not appoint an external director as an office holder
and cannot employ or receive services from that person for pay,
either directly or indirectly, including through a corporation
controlled by that person.
|
|
|
Election of external directors |
External directors are elected by a majority vote at a
shareholders meeting, provided that either:
|
|
|
|
|
at least one-third of the shares of non-controlling shareholders
voted at the meeting vote in favor of the election of the
external director; or |
|
|
|
the total number of shares of non-controlling shareholders voted
against the election of the external director does not exceed 1%
of the aggregate voting rights in the company. |
The initial term of an external director is three years and he
or she may be reelected to one additional term of three years.
Thereafter, he or she may be reelected by our shareholders for
additional periods of up to three years each only if the audit
committee and the board of directors confirm that, in light of
the external directors expertise and special contribution
to the work of the board of directors and its committees, the
reelection for such additional period is beneficial to the
company. An external director may only be removed by the same
percentage of shareholders as is required for his or her
election, or by a court, and then only if the external director
ceases to meet the statutory qualifications or violates his or
her duty of loyalty to the company. If an external directorship
becomes vacant, a companys board of directors is required
under the Companies Law to call a shareholders meeting
promptly to appoint a new external director.
Each committee of a companys board of directors that has
the right to exercise a power delegated by the board of
directors is required to include at least one external director,
and the audit committee is required to include all of the
external directors. An external director is entitled to
compensation as provided in regulations adopted under the
Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited from receiving any
other compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with
services provided as an external director.
|
|
|
Israeli-Appointed Directors |
Our license requires, and our articles of association provide,
that at least 20% of our directors will be appointed and removed
by shareholders who are Israeli citizens and Israeli residents
from among our founding shareholders. If our Board of Directors
is comprised of 14 directors or less, the Israeli
shareholders will be entitled to appoint two directors, and if
our Board of Directors is comprised of between 15 and
24 directors, the Israeli shareholders will be entitled to
appoint three directors. Our articles of association provide
that DIC, as founding shareholder, is responsible for complying
with the requirement under our license that Israeli citizens and
residents from among our founding shareholders hold at least 20%
of our outstanding shares, and that so long as DIC so complies,
it will be entitled to appoint and remove these directors.
Board Committees
Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee, cost
analysis committee and an option committee.
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public
company must establish an audit committee. The audit committee
must consist of at least three directors and must include all of
the companys external directors. The audit committee may
not include the chairman of the
107
board, any director employed by the company or providing
services to the company on an ongoing basis, a controlling
shareholder or any of a controlling shareholders
relatives. The members of the audit committee are also required
to meet the independence requirements established by the SEC in
accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
subject to the phase-in requirements described below. The rules
of the SEC also require that we disclose in our annual reports
whether at least one member of the audit committee is an
audit committee financial expert.
Our audit committee provides assistance to our Board of
Directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary obligations in
matters involving our accounting, auditing, financial reporting
and internal control functions by pre-approving the services
performed by our independent accountants and reviewing their
reports regarding our accounting practices and systems of
internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee
also oversees the audit efforts of our independent accountants
and takes those actions as it deems necessary to satisfy itself
that the accountants are independent of management. Under the
Companies Law, the audit committee is required to identify
deficiencies in the management of the company, including by
consulting with the internal auditor or the independent
accountants, and recommending remedial actions to the board of
directors, and is responsible for reviewing and approving
certain related party transactions, as described below. The
audit committee may not approve such a related party transaction
unless at the time of approval the two external directors were
serving as members of the audit committee and at least one of
them was present at the meeting at which the approval was
granted.
Upon listing of our ordinary shares on the New York Stock
Exchange, our audit committee will include one independent
member, Shlomo Waxe, to meet the listing requirements of the New
York Stock Exchange and the rules of the SEC and will consist of
Oren Lieder (Chairman), Raanan Cohen, Avraham Bigger and Shlomo
Waxe. Within 90 days of listing, we will ensure that a
majority of the members are independent and will ensure that the
committee is composed entirely of independent members within one
year of listing.
Our cost analysis committee reviews our costs and recommends
ways to achieve cost efficiency in our activities to our Board
of Directors. Our cost analysis committee consists of
Messrs. Lieder (Chairman), Erel, Cohen, Livnat, Bisker and
Waxe.
Our option committee administers the issuance of options under
our 2006 Share Incentive Plan to our employees who are not
office holders, as well as any actions and decisions necessary
for the ongoing management of the plan. Our option committee
consists of Messrs. Erel (Chairman), Dankner and Livnat.
|
|
|
Security committee and observer |
Our security committee, which is required to be appointed once
we become a public company pursuant to our license, deals with
matters concerning state security. Only directors who have the
requisite security clearance by Israels General Security
Services may be members of this committee. The committee is
required to be comprised of at least four members, including at
least one external director. In addition, the Minister of
Communications is entitled under our license to appoint a state
employee with security clearance to act as an observer in all
meetings of our Board of Directors and its committees. The
composition of the security committee will be determined after
the closing of the offering.
108
Internal Auditor
Under the Companies Law, the board of directors of a public
company must appoint an internal auditor nominated by the audit
committee. The role of the internal auditor is to examine
whether a companys actions comply with applicable law and
orderly business procedure. Under the Companies Law, the
internal auditor may not be an interested party or an office
holder, or a relative of any of the foregoing, nor may the
internal auditor be the companys independent accountant or
its representative. An interested party is generally defined in
the Companies Law as a 5% or greater shareholder, any person or
entity who has the right to designate one director or more or
the chief executive officer of the company or any person who
serves as a director or as the chief executive officer. Our
internal auditor is Mr. Eli Nir, CPA.
Approval of Specified Related Party Transactions under
Israeli Law
|
|
|
Fiduciary duties of office holders |
The Companies Law imposes a duty of care and a duty of loyalty
on all office holders of a company. The duty of care requires an
office holder to act with the degree of care with which a
reasonable office holder in the same position would have acted
under the same circumstances. The duty of care includes a duty
to use reasonable means, in light of the circumstances, to
obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
information on the appropriateness of a given action brought for
his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her
position; and |
|
|
|
all other important information pertaining to these actions. |
The duty of loyalty of an office holder includes a duty to act
in good faith and for the best interests of the company,
including to:
|
|
|
|
|
refrain from any conflict of interest between the performance of
his or her duties in the company and his or her other duties or
personal affairs; |
|
|
|
refrain from any activity that is competitive with the company; |
|
|
|
refrain from exploiting any business opportunity of the company
to receive a personal gain for himself or herself or
others; and |
|
|
|
disclose to the company any information or documents relating to
the companys affairs which the office holder received as a
result of his or her position as an office holder. |
|
|
|
Personal interests of an office holder |
The Companies Law requires that an office holder disclose any
personal interest that he or she may have and all related
material information known to him or her relating to any
existing or proposed transaction by the company promptly and in
any event no later than the first meeting of the board of
directors at which such transaction is considered. If the
transaction is an extraordinary transaction, the office holder
must also disclose any personal interest held by the office
holders spouse, siblings, parents, grandparents,
descendants, spouses descendants and the spouses of any of
these people.
Under the Companies Law, an extraordinary transaction is a
transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
that is not on market terms; or |
|
|
|
that is likely to have a material impact on the companys
profitability, assets or liabilities. |
Under the Companies Law, once an office holder complies with the
above disclosure requirement, the transaction can be approved,
provided that it is not adverse to the companys
109
interest. A director who has a personal interest in a matter
which is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or
the audit committee will generally not be present at this
meeting or vote on this matter unless a majority of the
directors or members of the audit committee have a personal
interest in the matter. If a majority of the directors have a
personal interest in the matter, the matter also requires
approval of the shareholders of the company. Under the Companies
Law, unless the articles of association provide otherwise, a
transaction with an office holder, or a transaction with a third
party in which the office holder has a personal interest,
requires approval by the board of directors. If it is an
extraordinary transaction or an undertaking to indemnify or
insure an office holder who is not a director, audit committee
approval is required, as well. Arrangements regarding the
compensation, indemnification or insurance of a director require
the approval of the audit committee, board of directors and
shareholders, in that order. Our articles of association provide
that a non-extraordinary transaction with an office holder, or
with a third party in which an office holder has a personal
interest, may be approved by our Board of Directors, by our
Audit Committee or, if the transaction involves the provision of
our communications services and equipment or involves annual
payments not exceeding NIS 250,000 per transaction, by our
authorized signatories.
|
|
|
Personal interests of a controlling shareholder |
Under the Companies Law, the disclosure requirements that apply
to an office holder also apply to a controlling shareholder of a
public company. A controlling shareholder is a shareholder who
has the ability to direct the activities of a company, including
a shareholder that owns 25% or more of the voting rights if no
other shareholder owns more than 50% of the voting rights, but
excluding a shareholder whose power derives solely from his or
her position on the board of directors or any other position
with the company. Accordingly, DIC, and entities and persons
that directly or indirectly control DIC, are considered to be
our controlling shareholders. Extraordinary transactions with a
controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder
has a personal interest, and the terms of compensation of a
controlling shareholder or his or her relative, who is an
employee or director, require the approval of the audit
committee, the board of directors and a majority of the
shareholders of the company. In addition, the shareholder
approval must fulfill one of the following requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
at least one-third of the shareholders who have no personal
interest in the transaction and who vote on the matter must vote
in favor of the transaction; or |
|
|
|
the shareholders who have no personal interest in the
transaction who vote against the transaction may not represent
more than 1% of the voting rights in the company. |
Duties of shareholders
Under the Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to refrain
from abusing his or her power in the company and to act in good
faith in exercising its rights in, and performing its
obligations to the company and other shareholders, including,
among other things, voting at general meetings of shareholders
on the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
an amendment to the articles of association; |
|
|
|
an increase in the companys authorized share capital; |
|
|
|
a merger; and |
|
|
|
approval of related party transactions that require shareholder
approval. |
In addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder who
knows that its vote can determine the outcome of a
shareholders vote and any shareholder who, under the
companys articles of association, can appoint or prevent
the appointment of an office holder or holds any other right in
respect of the company, is required to act with fairness towards
the company. The
110
Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty
except to state that the remedies generally available upon a
breach of contract will also apply in the event of a breach of
the duty to act with fairness.
Approval of Private Placements
Under the Companies Law, a private placement of securities
requires approval by the board of directors and the shareholders
of the company if it will cause a person to become a controlling
shareholder or if:
|
|
|
|
|
the securities issued amount to 20% or more of the
companys outstanding voting rights before the issuance; |
|
|
|
some or all of the consideration is other than cash or listed
securities or the transaction is not on market terms; and |
|
|
|
the transaction will increase the relative holdings of a
shareholder that holds 5% or more of the companys
outstanding share capital or voting rights or that will cause
any person to become, as a result of the issuance, a holder of
more than 5% of the companys outstanding share capital or
voting rights. |
Executive Officer and Director Compensation
From June 2005 to September 2005, Mr. Amos Shapira was
employed by DIC. In the capacity of such employment he provided
DIC with various services, including services in relation to us.
In 2005, we reimbursed DIC the sum of NIS 556,000 for
Mr. Shapiras services in relation to us during this
period.
In October 2005, we formally hired Mr. Shapira as our
President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Shapira is
entitled to a gross monthly salary of NIS 120,000, linked to the
Israeli CPI. He is also entitled to a company car, the use of a
cellular phone and to reimbursement of incidental private
expenses in the amount of NIS 9,000 per year.
Mr. Shapira is entitled to a fixed bonus equal to six
months salary per year, in respect of which no social
benefits are accrued. He received a one-time signing bonus of
NIS 3.4 million and he is entitled, commencing from the
date that our 2006 annual financial statements are published, to
an annual bonus based on our annual profits, in an amount not to
exceed NIS 2.8 million. Mr. Shapira is also entitled
to participate in a share option plan, which was subsequently
adopted in September 2006. Mr. Shapiras agreement
contains provisions for vacation days, sick leave,
managers insurance and an education fund. The agreement is
for an unspecified period of time and can be terminated by
either party with advance notice of three months.
Mr. Shapira will continue to receive his salary and
benefits for a period of nine months after termination by either
party, unless we terminate the agreement for cause. The
aggregate monthly cost to us of Mr. Shapiras
employment is NIS 170,000.
The aggregate direct compensation we paid to all our executive
officers and directors as a group (26 persons) for 2005 was
approximately NIS 40.8 million, of which approximately NIS
11.5 million was set aside or accrued to provide for
pension, retirement, severance or similar benefits. These
amounts do not include expenses we incurred for other payments,
including dues for professional and business associations,
business travel and other expenses and benefits commonly
reimbursed or paid by companies in Israel. These amounts include
a severance payment of NIS 10.9 million to our previous
chief executive officer.
We pay no cash compensation to our directors who are affiliated
with DIC for their services as directors, but we pay DIC NIS
2.0 million per year for management services. We pay Shlomo
Waxe, our independent director, a monthly directors fee of
$3,000 plus Israeli value-added tax and each of our two external
directors will receive a fee in accordance with the Companies
Law and regulations promulgated thereunder.
111
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
2006 Share Incentive Plan |
In September 2006, our Board of Directors approved an option
plan for our employees, directors, consultants and
sub-contractors and to those of our affiliates and our
shareholders affiliates. The plan has an initial pool of
2,500,000 options or restricted stock units, or RSUs and is
intended to qualify for capital gains tax treatment under
Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance.
Under the plan, our Board of Directors (or an option committee
to which such authority may be delegated by our Board of
Directors) is authorized to determine the terms of the awards,
including the identity of grantees, the number of options or
RSUs granted, the vesting schedule and the exercise price.
The options/ RSUs have a term of six years and vest in four
equal installments on each of the first, second, third and
fourth anniversary of the date of grant. Under the plan,
unvested options/ RSUs terminate immediately upon termination of
employment or service. The plan defines acceleration events of
options/ RSUs granted, including a merger, a consolidation, a
sale of all or substantially all of our consolidated assets, or
any reduction in share ownership by DIC and its affiliates to
less than 50.01% of our outstanding share capital. The plan
terminates upon the earlier of ten years from its adoption date
or the termination of all outstanding options/ RSUs pursuant to
an acceleration event.
In October and November 2006, we granted options to purchase an
aggregate of 2,414,143 ordinary shares at an exercise price of
$12.60 per share on the terms set forth above. Among those
grants were options to purchase up to 450,000 ordinary shares to
each of Mr. Ami Erel, our Chairman of the Board, and
Mr. Amos Shapira, our Chief Executive Officer. The balance
of those grants was made to our officers and senior employees.
If we distribute cash dividends before the exercise of these
options, the exercise price of each option will be reduced by an
amount equal to the gross amount of the dividend per share
distributed.
|
|
|
Phantom compensation plan |
In June 2001, our Board of Directors adopted a compensation plan
for officers and other senior employees. In November 2006, our
Board of Directors terminated this plan and, as of
December 1, 2006, had disbursed all outstanding bonuses
under the plan. The plan contemplated an annual cash bonus based
on a company valuation prepared for us by an independent
assessor, based on our financial statements for the period ended
September 30 of the applicable year. The vesting and
exercise periods of each employees bonus were determined
on an individual basis and was subject to certain conditions,
such as the existence of an employer-employee relationship at
the time of exercise. In the event of a public offering of our
ordinary shares, our Board of Directors was entitled to
substitute options convertible into our ordinary shares for
bonus amounts not yet exercised.
112
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Agreements among Our Shareholders
In September 2005, DIC acquired the shares and voting rights in
our company held indirectly by BellSouth and the Safra brothers.
In 2006, DIC sold a portion of these shares in four transactions
to six financial investors based on the price of the Safra
transaction, with adjustments for dividends paid and interest
accrued during the period from the closing of the Safra
transaction to the applicable sale transaction. The following
summaries of the agreements between DIC and certain other
shareholders relate only to provisions that survive the closing
of this offering.
|
|
|
Original 1997 shareholders agreement |
Brian Greenspun, Daniel Steinmetz, Benjamin Steinmetz and Shlomo
Piotrkowsky, who own, directly or indirectly, an aggregate of
5.5% of our outstanding ordinary shares, granted the voting
rights in their shares to BellSouth and the Safra brothers. The
voting rights were assigned to DIC in connection with its
acquisition of our control in September 2005. These minority
shareholders are restricted from transferring their shares
without the prior written consent of DIC and subject to a right
of first refusal in favor of DIC. Each of these minority
shareholders is also committed not to compete, directly or
indirectly, with our cellular communications business in Israel
so long as he is a shareholder and for a period of one year
thereafter.
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs 2006 share purchase agreement and
shareholders agreement |
In 2006, DIC sold 5% of our issued and outstanding share capital
to Goldman Sachs International, an affiliate of Goldman
Sachs & Co. In connection with this transaction, DIC
undertook to cause us, subject to applicable law and contractual
limitations, to adopt a dividend policy to distribute annually
at least 75% of our annual net income, provided that any such
distribution is not detrimental to our cash needs or to any
plans authorized by our Board of Directors. The parties agreed
that our Board of Directors would include at least seven
directors, excluding external (independent) directors, with
the chairman of our Board of Directors having a deciding vote on
matters that are tied. For so long as DIC is our largest
shareholder and holds at least 35% of our voting power, it was
agreed that the parties would endeavor to cause the election of
our chairman from among the directors nominated by the IDB
group. The parties further agreed that they would use all their
voting power to elect all nominees designated by the IDB group
to our Board of Directors.
DIC granted Goldman Sachs International a right of first
refusal, which expires on June 15, 2007, in the event that
a member of the IDB group wishes to sell our shares to a
purchaser outside the IDB group at a price per share that is
lower than the purchase price of $14.66 per share paid by
Goldman Sachs International (subject to adjustment for dividend
distributions and other recapitalization events), so long as the
exercise of this right will not result in Goldman Sachs
International holding more than 10% of our outstanding ordinary
shares. Any private transfer of shares by either party is
subject to the transferee becoming a party to the shareholders
agreement between the parties. The parties are prohibited from
transferring their holdings to a person who is in direct
competition with us in Israel, if such transfer may result in
cancellation or revocation of any of our licenses, or to a
person which is, or is controlled by, a resident or citizen of a
country with which the State of Israel has no diplomatic
relations or which is an adversary thereof. Goldman Sachs
International agreed in principle to the sale of certain telecom
holdings of the IDB group to us, subject to the conditions set
forth in the agreement. We are not aware of any concrete plan
for such a transaction, which in any event would not be
permitted by current regulatory restrictions.
113
|
|
|
Migdal 2006 share purchase agreement |
In 2006, DIC sold 4% of our outstanding ordinary shares to
Migdal Insurance Company Ltd. and certain of its affiliates, or
the Migdal shareholders. As part of this transaction, DIC
granted the Migdal shareholders (i) a tag along right, in
the event it sells shares resulting in it no longer being a
controlling shareholder and (ii) an adjustment mechanism,
in the event that, prior to April 3, 2008, it sells shares
at a price per share which is less than the price of
$14.71 per share paid by the Migdal shareholders (subject
to adjustment for dividend distributions and other
recapitalization events), according to which it will transfer to
the Migdal shareholders, for no additional consideration, such
number of shares that equals the price difference based on the
lower price per share. In return, DIC has the right to force the
Migdal shareholders to sell their shares in a transaction in
which DIC sells all of its shares to a purchaser outside the IDB
group. If DIC enters into a subsequent agreement for the sale of
shares on terms (other than price) more favorable to the
purchaser than those given to the Migdal shareholders before the
earlier of April 3, 2008 and the sale by DIC of an
aggregate of an additional 9.5% of our share capital, those
terms will generally be applied to the Migdal shareholders, as
well.
|
|
|
Bank Leumi 2006 share purchase agreement and First
International Bank 2006 share purchase agreement |
In 2006, DIC sold 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares to Leumi
and Co. Investment House Ltd. (an affiliate of Bank Leumi
Le-Israel B.M.) and 2% of our outstanding shares to Stocofin
(Israel) Ltd. (an affiliate of the First International Bank of
Israel Ltd.). As part of these transactions, DIC undertook to
cause us, subject to applicable law, our license and contractual
limitations, to adopt a dividend policy to distribute annually
at least 75% of our annual net income, provided that any such
distribution is not detrimental to our cash needs or to any
plans authorized by our Board of Directors. Furthermore, DIC
granted the other parties (i) a tag along right in the
event it sells shares resulting in the purchaser becoming a
controlling shareholder and (ii) an adjustment mechanism,
in the event that, prior to May 29, 2008, it sells shares
or we issue shares (subject to certain exceptions) at a price
per share lower than the price per share paid by the other
parties (which was $14.87 for Leumi and Co. Investment House
Ltd. and $14.20 for Stocofin (Israel) Ltd.) (subject to
adjustment for dividend distributions and other recapitalization
events), according to which it will transfer to such other
parties, for no additional consideration, such number of shares
that equals the price difference based on the lower price per
share.
Relationship with Our Prior Shareholders and Directors
In 2003 and 2004, we paid Zeev Feldman, a former director,
approximately NIS 85,700 and NIS 299,000, respectively, in
consulting fees.
In 2003, 2004 and 2005, when BellSouth was one of our
controlling shareholders, we paid to BellSouth approximately NIS
0.97 million, NIS 2.4 million and NIS
1.1 million, respectively, for services, including
insurance premiums under BellSouths umbrella policy.
In connection with the change of control of our company in
September 2005, we entered into agreements with our former
controlling shareholders and directors mutually waiving any
claims of liability, with certain exceptions.
Relationship with IDB
In 2005, we reimbursed DIC in the amount NIS 556,000 for
payments it made to Mr. Amos Shapira, our chief executive
officer, for services provided in relation to us from June to
September 2005. Mr. Shapiras employment terms are
summarized under Management Executive Officer
and Director Compensation.
114
As part of the issuance of our debentures in December 2005,
January 2006 and May 2006, we sold NIS 176.7 million
aggregate principal amount of our Series A and
Series B Debentures to investors who are members of the IDB
group. The terms of participation of our affiliates in all of
these transactions were the same as those of unaffiliated
parties.
In October 2006, we entered into an agreement with DIC, to
benefit from the experience that DIC has in telecommunications
and in the Israeli market generally, pursuant to which DIC
provides us with services in the areas of management, finance,
business and accountancy in consideration of NIS
2.0 million per year. Among the services included are
consulting and assistance on managerial, economic and accounting
issues, such as the preparation of an annual budget, strategic
plans and central business processes for the Company. In
addition, the provision of employees and officers of DIC and its
affiliates to be directors of Cellcom is included in the
agreement. This agreement is for a term of one year and is
automatically renewed for one-year terms unless either party
provides 60 days prior notice to the contrary.
In the ordinary course of business, from time to time, we
purchase, lease, sell and cooperate in the sale of goods and
services, or otherwise engage in transactions with entities that
are members of the IDB group and entities affiliated with
IDBs principal shareholders or officers. We believe that
all such transactions are on commercial terms comparable to
those that we could obtain from unaffiliated parties.
Registration Rights Agreement
In 2006, we entered into a registration rights agreement with
DIC, two wholly-owned subsidiaries of DIC which are shareholders
and six other shareholders. For a summary of the terms of the
agreement, please see Shares Eligible for Future
Sale.
115
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial
ownership of our shares as of December 31, 2006 by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person, or group of affiliated persons, known to us to be
the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares; |
|
|
|
each selling shareholder; |
|
|
|
each of our directors and executive officers; and |
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
In accordance with the rules of the SEC, beneficial ownership
includes voting or investment power with respect to securities
and includes the shares issuable pursuant to options that are
exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2006.
Shares issuable pursuant to options are deemed outstanding for
computing the percentage of the person holding such options but
are not outstanding for computing the percentage of any other
person. The percentage of beneficial ownership for the following
table is based on 97,500,000 ordinary shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2006 and assumes no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. To our knowledge,
except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant
to applicable community property laws, our major shareholders do
not have different voting rights and the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
ordinary shares held by them. The address of each director and
officer listed below is c/o Cellcom Israel Ltd., 10
Hagavish Street, Netanya, Israel 42140.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
Owned Before the | |
|
Shares Offered in the | |
|
Owned After the | |
|
|
Offering | |
|
Offering | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
5% Shareholders and Selling Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Investment Corporation Ltd.(1)
|
|
|
81,900,000 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
19,025,000 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
62,875,000 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
Goldman Sachs International
|
|
|
4,875,000 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
3,900,000 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Leumi & Co. Investment House Ltd.
|
|
|
4,875,000 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,875,000 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Directors and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ami Erel(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nochi Dankner(3)
|
|
|
81,900,000 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
19,025,000 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
62,875,000 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
Isaac Manor(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shay Livnat(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raanan Cohen(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oren Lieder(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avraham Bigger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rafi Bisker(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shlomo Waxe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amos Shapira
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tal Raz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliezer (Lipa) Ogman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isaiah Rozenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itamar Bartov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refael Poran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meir Barav
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronit Ben-Basat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amos Maor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adi Cohen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liat Menahemi-Stadler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gil Ben-Itzhak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and officers as a group (21 persons)
|
|
|
81,900,000 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
19,025,000 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
62,875,000 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
% |
116
|
|
(1) |
Includes 24,375,855 ordinary shares held by two wholly-owned
subsidiaries of DIC (namely, PEC Israel Economic Corporation, a
Maine corporation, and DIC Communication and Technology Ltd., an
Israeli company) and 5,362,500 ordinary shares, representing
5.5% of our issued and outstanding shares, held by four
shareholders whose voting rights are vested in DIC. DIC is a
majority-owned subsidiary of IDB Development Corporation Ltd.,
or IDB Development, which in turn is a majority-owned subsidiary
of IDB. IDB, IDB Development and DIC are public Israeli
companies traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. |
IDB is controlled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Ganden Holdings Ltd., or Ganden, a private Israeli company
controlled by Nochi Dankner (who is also the Chairman of IDB,
IDB Development and DIC and one of our directors) and his sister
Shelly Bergman, holds, directly and through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, approximately 44.88% of the outstanding shares of
IDB; |
|
|
|
Shelly Bergman, through a wholly-owned company, holds
approximately 7.23% of the outstanding shares of IDB; |
|
|
|
Avraham Livnat Ltd., or Livnat, a private company controlled by
Avraham Livnat (one of whose sons, Zvi Livnat, is a director and
Executive Vice President of IDB, Deputy Chairman of IDB
Development and a director of DIC, and another son, Shay Livnat,
is one of our directors and a director of IDB Development)
holds, directly and through a wholly-owned subsidiary,
approximately 10.38% of the outstanding shares of IDB; and |
|
|
|
Manor Holdings BA Ltd., or Manor, a private company controlled
by Ruth Manor (whose husband, Isaac Manor, is one of our
directors and he and their son Don Manor are directors of IDB,
IDB Development and DIC) holds, directly and through a
majority-owned subsidiary, approximately 10.37% of the
outstanding shares of IDB. |
Subsidiaries of Ganden, Livnat and Manor have entered into a
shareholders agreement with respect to shares of IDB
constituting 3 1.02%, 10.34% and 10.34%, respectively, of the
outstanding shares of IDB for the purpose of maintaining and
exercising control of IDB as a group. Their additional holdings
in IDB are not subject to the shareholders agreement. The term
of the shareholders agreement expires in May 2023.
Most of the foregoing shares in IDB have been pledged to
financial institutions as collateral for loans taken to finance
the purchase of the shares. Upon certain events of default,
these financial institutions may foreclose on the loans and
assume ownership of or sell the shares.
Based on the foregoing, IDB and IDB Development (by reason of
their control of DIC), Ganden, Manor and Livnat (by reason of
their control of IDB) and Nochi Dankner, Shelly Bergman, Ruth
Manor, and Avraham Livnat (by reason of their control of Ganden,
Manor and Livnat, respectively) may be deemed to share with DIC
the power to vote and dispose of our shares beneficially owned
by DIC.
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Erel, the President and Chief Executive Officer of DIC,
disclaims beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares owned by
DIC. |
|
(3) |
Represents the 81,900,000 ordinary shares owned by DIC, of which
Mr. Dankner is the Chairman. Mr. Dankner is also the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IDB and the Chairman of
IDB Development. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Manor, the Deputy Chairman of the board of directors of
IDB and a member of the board of directors of IDB Development
and DIC, disclaims beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares
owned by DIC. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Livnat, a member of the board of directors of IDB
Development, disclaims beneficial ownership of the ordinary
shares owned by DIC. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Cohen, the Vice President of DIC, disclaims beneficial
ownership of the ordinary shares owned by DIC. |
|
(7) |
Mr. Lieder, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of DIC, disclaims beneficial ownership of the ordinary
shares owned by DIC. |
|
(8) |
Mr. Bisker, a member of the board of directors of IDB, IDB
Development and DIC, disclaims beneficial ownership of the
ordinary shares owned by DIC. |
As of December 31, 2006, we had two holders of record of
our equity securities who are, to our knowledge,
U.S. persons. In aggregate, these shareholders hold
approximately 13.0% of our outstanding shares. One of the
holders, PEC Israel Economic Corporation, a subsidiary of DIC,
holds 12.5% of our outstanding shares; this holding is included
in DICs beneficial ownership entry in the table above.
117
Prior to September 2005, our initial principal shareholders were
DIC, which indirectly held approximately 25% of our share
capital, and BellSouth Corporation and the Safra brothers of
Brazil, who indirectly held together approximately 69.5% of our
share capital and held the voting rights in additional 5.5% of
our share capital. DIC acquired the shares and voting rights of
BellSouth and the Safra brothers in September 2005 and
subsequently sold an aggregate of 16.0% of our share capital to
financial investors in four transactions during 2006.
Certain affiliates of Leumi & Co. Investment House Ltd.
have, from time to time, provided credit facilities to us.
Goldman, Sachs & Co., an affiliate of Goldman Sachs
International, is an underwriter of this offering.
118
DESCRIPTION OF SHARE CAPITAL
The following description of our share capital and provisions
of our articles of association are summaries and are qualified
by reference to the articles of association that will become
effective upon closing of this offering, which have been filed
with the SEC as an exhibit to our registration statement, of
which this prospectus forms a part.
Ordinary Shares
Our authorized share capital consists of 300,000,000 ordinary
shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share, of which 97,500,000
are issued and outstanding. We have not issued any shares within
the past three years.
All of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares are duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. Our
ordinary shares are not redeemable and following the closing of
this offering will not have preemptive rights.
Transfer of Shares
Fully paid ordinary shares are issued in registered form and may
be freely transferred unless the transfer is restricted or
prohibited by our articles of association, applicable law, our
licenses, the rules of the SEC or the rules of a stock exchange
on which the shares are traded. The ownership or voting of
ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel is not restricted in
any way by our articles of association or the laws of the State
of Israel, except for ownership by nationals of some countries
that are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel.
According to our licenses, investors are prohibited from
acquiring (alone or together with relatives or with other
parties who collaborate on a regular basis) or transferring our
shares, directly or indirectly (including a transfer by way of
foreclosing on a pledge), in one transaction or a series of
transactions, if such acquisition or transfer will result in a
holding or transfer of 10% or more of any of our means of
control, or from transferring any of our means of control if as
a result of such transfer, control over our company will be
transferred from one party to another, without the prior
approval of the Ministry of Communications. Our specific
licenses also require approval of the Minister of Communications
before acquiring the ability to effect a significant influence
over us. In this context, holding 25% of our means of control is
presumed to confer significant influence. In addition, according
to our licenses, if you hold more than 5% of our means of
control, you may not hold, directly or indirectly, more than 5%
of the means of control in Bezeq or another cellular operator in
Israel (subject to certain exceptions) and may not serve as an
office holder of one of our competitors, other than in specific
circumstances and subject to the approval of the Ministry of
Communications. For more details relating to these restrictions,
please see Regulatory Matters Our Principal
License and our principal license, a convenience
translation of which has been filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We
plan to post the holding and transfer restrictions under our
licenses on our website.
Voting
Holders of our ordinary shares have one vote for each ordinary
share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders at
a shareholder meeting. Shareholders may vote at shareholder
meetings either in person, by proxy or by written ballot.
Shareholder voting rights may be affected by the grant of
special voting rights to the holders of a class of shares with
preferential rights that may be authorized in the future. The
Companies Law provides that a shareholder, in exercising his or
her rights and performing his or her obligations toward the
company and its other shareholders, must act in good faith and
in a customary manner, and avoid abusing his or her power. This
is required when voting at general meetings on matters such as
changes to the articles of association, increasing the
companys registered capital,
119
mergers and approval of related party transactions. A
shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from depriving
any other shareholder of their rights as a shareholder. In
addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder who knows
that its vote can determine the outcome of a shareholder vote
and any shareholder who, under the companys articles of
association, can appoint or prevent the appointment of an office
holder, is required to act with fairness towards the company.
The Companies Law does not describe the substance of this duty,
except to state that the remedies generally available upon a
breach of contract will apply also in the event of a breach of
the duty to act with fairness, and, to the best of our
knowledge, there is no binding case law that addresses this
subject directly.
As required under our license, our articles of association
provide that any holdings of our ordinary shares that contravene
the holding or transfer restrictions contained in our license,
which are summarized under Transfer of
Shares and Regulatory Matters Our
Principal License, will not be entitled to voting rights.
In addition, our license requires that as a condition to voting
at any meeting of shareholders, in person or by proxy, each
shareholder must certify that its holdings of our shares do not
contravene the restrictions contained in our license.
Election of Directors
Our ordinary shares do not have cumulative voting rights for the
election of directors. Rather, under our articles of association
our directors (other than external directors and directors
appointed by Israeli citizens and residents from among our
founding shareholders) are elected at a shareholders meeting by
a simple majority of our ordinary shares. As a result, the
holders of our ordinary shares that represent more than 50% of
the voting power represented at a shareholder meeting have the
power to elect any or all of our directors whose positions are
being filled at that meeting, subject to the special approval
requirements for external directors described under
Management External Directors and the
right of DIC to directly appoint 20% of our directors described
under Management Israeli-Appointed
Directors. Directors may also be appointed for office by
our Board of Directors until the next annual general meeting of
shareholders.
Dividend and Liquidation Rights
Our board of directors may declare a dividend to be paid to the
holders of ordinary shares on a pro rata basis. Dividends may
only be paid out of our profits and other surplus funds, as
defined in the Companies Law, as of our most recent financial
statement or as accrued over the past two years, whichever is
higher, or, in the absence of such profits or surplus, with
court approval. In any event, a dividend is permitted only if
there is no reasonable concern that the payment of the dividend
will prevent us from satisfying our existing and foreseeable
obligations as they become due. In the event of our liquidation,
after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will
be distributed to the holders of ordinary shares on a pro rata
basis. This right may be affected by the grant of preferential
dividend or distribution rights to the holders of a class of
shares with preferential rights that may be authorized in the
future.
Shareholder Meetings
We are required to convene an annual general meeting of our
shareholders once every calendar year within a period of not
more than 15 months following the preceding annual general
meeting. Our board of directors is required to convene a special
general meeting of our shareholders at the request of two
directors or one quarter of the members of our Board of
Directors or at the request of one or more holders of 5% or more
of our share capital and 1% of our voting power or the holder or
holders of 5% or more of our voting power. All shareholder
meetings require prior notice of at least 21 days, or up to
35 days if required by applicable law or regulation. The
chairperson of our Board of Directors presides over our general
meetings. Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law and the
regulations promulgated thereunder,
120
shareholders entitled to participate and vote at general
meetings are the shareholders of record on a date to be decided
by the board of directors, which may be between four and
40 days prior to the date of the meeting.
Quorum
Our articles of association provide that the quorum required for
any meeting of shareholders shall consist of at least two
shareholders present, in person or by proxy or written ballot,
who hold or represent between them at least one-third of the
voting power of our issued share capital. A meeting adjourned
for lack of a quorum generally is adjourned to the same day in
the following week at the same time and place or, if not set
forth in the notice to shareholders, to a time and place set by
the chairman of the meeting with the consent of the holders of a
majority of the voting power represented at the meeting and
voting on the question of adjournment. At the reconvened
meeting, the required quorum consists of at least two
shareholders present, in person or by proxy or written ballot,
unless the meeting was called pursuant to a request by our
shareholders in which case the quorum required is the number of
shareholders required to call the meeting as described under
Shareholder Meetings.
Objects and Purposes
Our registration number with the Israeli registrar of companies
is 51-1930125. Our object is to engage, directly or indirectly,
in any lawful undertaking or business whatsoever as determined
by our Board of Directors, including, without limitation, as
stipulated in our memorandum of association.
Resolutions
An ordinary resolution at a shareholders meeting requires
approval by a simple majority of the voting rights represented
at the meeting, in person, by proxy or written ballot, and
voting on the resolution. Under the Companies Law, unless
otherwise provided in the articles of association or applicable
law, all resolutions of the shareholders require a simple
majority. A resolution for the voluntary winding up of the
company requires the approval by holders of 75% of the voting
rights represented at the meeting, in person or by proxy or
written ballot, and voting on the resolution.
Modification of Class Rights
The rights attached to any class, such as voting, liquidation
and dividend rights, may be amended by written consent of
holders of a majority of the issued shares of that class, or by
adoption of a resolution by a simple majority of the shares of
that class represented at a separate class meeting.
Mergers and Acquisitions under Israeli Law
The Companies Law includes provisions that allow a merger
transaction and requires that each company that is a party to a
merger have the transaction approved by its board of directors
and a vote of the majority of its shares at a shareholders
meeting. For purposes of the shareholder vote, unless a court
rules otherwise, the merger will not be deemed approved if a
majority of the shares represented at the shareholders meeting
that are held by parties other than the other party to the
merger, or by any person who holds 25% or more of the shares or
the right to appoint 25% or more of the directors of the other
party, vote against the merger. Upon the request of a creditor
of either party of the proposed merger, the court may delay or
prevent the merger if it concludes that there exists a
reasonable concern that as a result of the merger, the surviving
company will be unable to satisfy the obligations of any of the
parties to the merger. In addition, a merger may not be
completed unless at least (i) 50 days have passed
121
from the time that the requisite proposal for the merger has
been filed by each party with the Israeli Registrar of Companies
and (ii) 30 days have passed since the merger was
approved by the shareholders of each party.
The Companies Law also provides that an acquisition of shares of
a public company must be made by means of a special tender offer
if as a result of the acquisition the purchaser would become a
25% or greater shareholder of the company and there is no
existing 25% or greater shareholder in the company. An
acquisition of shares of a public company must also be made by
means of a tender offer if as a result of the acquisition the
purchaser would become a 45% or greater shareholder of the
company and there is no existing 45% or greater shareholder in
the company. These requirements do not apply if the acquisition
(i) occurs in the context of a private placement by the
company that received shareholder approval, (ii) was from a
25% shareholder of the company and resulted in the acquirer
becoming a 25% shareholder of the company or (iii) was from
a 45% shareholder of the company and resulted in the acquirer
becoming a 45% shareholder of the company. The special tender
offer must be extended to all shareholders but the offeror is
not required to purchase shares representing more than 5% of the
voting power attached to the companys outstanding shares,
regardless of how many shares are tendered by shareholders. The
special tender offer may be consummated only if (i) at
least 5% of the voting power attached to the companys
outstanding shares will be acquired by the offeror and
(ii) the number of shares tendered in the offer exceeds the
number of shares whose holders objected to the offer.
If, as a result of an acquisition of shares, the acquirer will
hold more than 90% of a companys outstanding shares, the
acquisition must be made by means of a tender offer for all of
the outstanding shares. If less than 5% of the outstanding
shares are not tendered in the tender offer, all the shares that
the acquirer offered to purchase will be transferred to it. The
law provides for appraisal rights if any shareholder files a
request in court within three months following the consummation
of a full tender offer. If more than 5% of the outstanding
shares are not tendered in the tender offer, then the acquirer
may not acquire shares in the tender offer that will cause his
shareholding to exceed 90% of the outstanding shares.
Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential
transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders who are
not exempt from Israeli income tax under Israeli law or an
applicable tax treaty. For example, Israeli tax law does not
recognize tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as
U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law
allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances but makes the
deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous conditions,
including a holding period of two years from the date of the
transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the
participating companies are restricted. Moreover, with respect
to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited
in time, and when the time expires, tax then becomes payable
even if no actual disposition of the shares has occurred. For
information regarding Israeli tax on the sale of our shares,
please see Taxation Israeli Tax
Considerations Capital Gains Tax on Sales of Our
Ordinary Shares.
Anti-Takeover Measures under Israeli Law
The Companies Law allows us to create and issue shares having
rights different from those attached to our ordinary shares,
including shares providing certain preferred or additional
rights to voting, distributions or other matters and shares
having preemptive rights. Following the closing of this
offering, we will not have any authorized or issued shares other
than ordinary shares. In the future, if we do create and issue a
class of shares other than ordinary shares, such class of
shares, depending on the specific rights that may be attached to
them, may delay or prevent a takeover or otherwise prevent our
shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market
value of their ordinary shares. The authorization of a new class
of shares will require an amendment to our articles of
association and to our memorandum, which requires the
122
prior approval of a simple majority of our shares represented
and voting at a shareholders meeting.
Our articles of association provide that our Board of Directors
may, at any time in its sole discretion, adopt protective
measures to prevent or delay a coercive takeover of us,
including, without limitation, the adoption of a shareholder
rights plan.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our ordinary shares is
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company.
New York Stock Exchange
We have been authorized to list our ordinary shares on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol CEL.
123
TAXATION
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a general discussion of certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of ownership and
disposition of the Companys shares by a
U.S. holder (as defined below). This discussion
does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the
tax considerations that may be relevant to a holder in light of
the holders particular circumstances and does not address
U.S. state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences. The discussion applies only to U.S. holders
(as defined below) that hold the shares as capital assets for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and it does not describe
all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to holders
subject to special rules, such as certain financial
institutions, insurance companies, dealers and traders in
securities or foreign currencies, persons holding the shares as
part of a hedge, straddle, conversion transaction or other
integrated transaction, persons whose functional currency for
U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the
U.S. dollar, partnerships or other entities classified as
partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons
liable for the alternative minimum tax, tax-exempt
organizations, or shareholders that own or are deemed to own 10%
or more of the Companys voting power.
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, administrative pronouncements, judicial decision and
final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as
currently in effect. These laws are subject to change, possibly
on a retroactive basis. Prospective investors are urged to
consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal,
state, local and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning
and disposing of shares in light of their particular
circumstances.
The discussion below applies only to U.S. holders. As used
herein, a U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of
the Companys shares that is, for U.S. federal tax
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created
or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any
political subdivision thereof; or |
|
|
|
an estate or trust the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source. |
If an entity that is classified as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes holds the shares, the
U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will
generally depend on the status of the partner and upon the
activities of the entity. Partners or members of such entities
should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences
of investments in the Companys shares.
|
|
|
Taxation of Distributions |
Distributions paid on the Companys shares, other than
certain pro rata distributions of ordinary shares, will be
treated as a dividend to the extent paid out of current or
accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles). Since the Company does
not maintain calculations of its earnings and profits under
U.S. federal income tax principles, U.S. holders will
generally be required to treat such distributions as taxable
dividends. Subject to applicable limitations, dividends paid to
certain non-corporate U.S. holders in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2011, will be taxable at a
maximum rate of 15%. The amount of a dividend will include any
amounts withheld by the Company or its paying agent in respect
of Israeli taxes. The amount of the dividend will be treated as
foreign source dividend income and will not be eligible for the
dividends received deduction generally allowed to
U.S. corporations under the Code.
124
Dividends paid in NIS will be included in a
U.S. holders income in a U.S. dollar amount
calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the
date of receipt of the dividend, regardless of whether the
payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the
dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of
receipt, a U.S. holder generally should not be required to
recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the
dividend income. A U.S. holder may have foreign currency
gain or loss if the holder does not convert the amount of such
dividend into U.S. dollars on the date of its receipt. Such
gain or loss would generally be treated as U.S. source
ordinary income or loss.
Subject to applicable limitations that may vary depending upon a
holders particular circumstances, Israeli taxes withheld
from dividends at a rate not exceeding the rate provided by the
U.S.-Israel income tax
treaty will be creditable against the holders
U.S. federal income tax liability. Israeli taxes withheld
in excess of the rate allowed by the treaty will not be eligible
for credit against a U.S. holders federal income tax
liability. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit
is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of
income. Instead of claiming a credit, a U.S. holder may, at
the holders election, deduct the otherwise creditable
foreign taxes in computing the taxable income for the year,
subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law.
The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability
of foreign tax credits and the deductibility of foreign taxes in
their particular circumstances.
|
|
|
Sale and Other Disposition of the Companys
Shares |
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, gain or loss realized
on the sale or other disposition of shares will be capital gain
or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. holder held the shares for more than one year. The
amount of gain or loss will be equal to the difference between
the tax basis in the shares disposed of and the amount realized
on the disposition. Such gain or loss will generally be
U.S. source gain or loss for foreign tax credit purposes.
|
|
|
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rule |
The Company believes that it was not a passive foreign
investment company for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, or PFIC, for the taxable year of 2006. The Company
also believes that it will not be a PFIC for the taxable year of
2007. However, since PFIC status depends upon the composition of
a companys income and assets and the market value of its
assets (including, among others, equity investments in less than
25%-owned entities) from time to time, there can be no assurance
that the Company will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable
year. If the Company were to be treated as a PFIC for any
taxable year during which a U.S. holder held a share in the
Company, certain adverse consequences could apply to the
U.S. holder. Specifically, gain recognized by a
U.S. holder on a sale or other disposition of a share would
be allocated ratably over the U.S. holders holding
period for the share. The amounts allocated to the taxable year
of the sale or other exchange and to any year before the Company
became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income in the current
year. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be
subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or
corporations, as appropriate, and an interest charge would be
imposed on the amount allocated to such taxable year. Further,
any distribution in excess of 125% of the average of the annual
distributions received by the U.S. holder during the
preceding three years or the U.S. holders holding
period, whichever if shorter, would be subject to taxation as
described above. Certain elections may be available (including a
mark-to-market
election) to U.S. holders that may mitigate the adverse
consequences resulting from PFIC status. In addition, if we were
to be treated as a PFIC in a taxable year in which we pay a
dividend or the prior taxable year, the 15% dividend rate
discussed above with respect to dividends paid to certain
non-corporate holders would not apply.
125
|
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding |
Payment of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the
United States or through certain
U.S.-related financial
intermediaries generally are subject to information reporting
and to backup withholding unless (i) the U.S. holder
is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) in the
case of backup withholding, the U.S. holder provides a
correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that the
U.S. holder is not subject to backup withholding. The
amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a
U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit against the
U.S. holders U.S. federal income tax liability
and may entitle the U.S. holder to a refund, provided that
the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service.
Israeli Tax Considerations
The following is a discussion of certain material Israeli tax
consequences to purchasers of our ordinary shares in this
offering. The discussion also contains a description of certain
relevant material provisions of the current Israeli income tax
structure applicable to companies in Israel, with special
reference to its effect on us. To the extent that the discussion
is based on new tax legislation that has not been subject to
judicial or administrative interpretation, we cannot assure you
that the appropriate tax authorities or the courts will accept
the views expressed in this discussion.
This discussion applies to purchasers that will hold our
ordinary shares as capital assets and does not address all of
the tax consequences that may be relevant to purchasers of our
ordinary shares in light of their particular circumstances or
certain types of purchasers of our ordinary shares subject to
special tax treatment. Because individual circumstances may
differ, you should consult your tax advisor to determine the
applicability of the rules discussed below to you and the
particular tax effects of the offering, including the
application of Israeli or other tax laws. The discussion below
is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal or
professional tax advice and is not exhaustive of all possible
tax considerations.
|
|
|
Taxation of Israeli Companies |
|
|
|
General Corporate Tax Structure |
Generally, Israeli companies are subject to corporate tax for
the 2006 tax year at the rate of 31% on taxable income and are
generally subject to capital gains tax at a rate of 25% on
capital gains derived after January 1, 2003, other than
capital gains from the sale of listed securities, which are
generally subject to tax at the current rate of 31% (unless a
company was not subject to the Inflationary Adjustments Law (see
below) or certain regulations prior to the time of publication
of a certain amendment to the Israeli tax laws (as further
explained below) in which case the tax rate is 25%). Following
an amendment to the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New Version],
1961, referred to as the Tax Ordinance, which came into effect
on January 1, 2006, the corporate tax rate is scheduled to
decrease as follows: 29% for the 2007 tax year, 27% for the 2008
tax year, 26% for the 2009 tax year and 25% for the 2010 tax
year and thereafter.
|
|
|
Special Provisions Relating to Taxation under Inflationary
Conditions |
We are subject to the provisions of the Income Tax Law
(Inflationary Adjustments), 1985, referred to as the
Inflationary Adjustments Law, which attempts to overcome the
problems presented to a traditional tax system by an economy
undergoing rapid inflation. The Inflationary Adjustments Law is
highly complex. The features that are material to us can be
described as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
When the value of a companys equity, as calculated under
the Inflationary Adjustments Law, exceeds the depreciated cost
of its fixed assets (as defined in the Inflationary Adjustments
Law), a deduction from taxable income is permitted equal to the
product of |
126
|
|
|
|
|
the excess multiplied by the applicable annual rate of
inflation. The maximum deduction permitted in any single tax
year is 70% of taxable income, with the unused portion permitted
to be carried forward, linked to the increase in the Israeli CPI. |
|
|
|
If the depreciated cost of a companys fixed assets exceeds
its equity, the product of the excess multiplied by the
applicable annual rate of inflation is added to taxable income. |
|
|
|
Subject to certain limitations, depreciation deductions on fixed
assets and losses carried forward are adjusted for inflation
based on the increase in the Israeli CPI. |
The Minister of Finance, with the approval of the Finance
Committee of the Israeli Parliament, may determine, during a
certain fiscal year (or until February 28th of the
following year) in which the rate of increase of the Israeli CPI
will not exceed (or did not exceed) 3%, that some or all of the
provisions of the Inflationary Adjustments Law will not apply
with respect to such fiscal year, or that the rate of increase
of the Israeli CPI relating to such fiscal year will be deemed
to be 0%, and to make the adjustments required to be made as a
result of such determination.
|
|
|
Capital Gains Tax on Sales of Our Ordinary Shares |
Israeli law generally imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of
any capital assets by residents of Israel, as defined for
Israeli tax purposes, and on the sale of assets located in
Israel, including shares in Israeli resident companies, by
non-residents of Israel, unless a specific exemption is
available or unless a tax treaty between Israel and the
shareholders country of residence provides otherwise. In
calculating capital gain, the law distinguishes between real
gain and inflationary surplus. The inflationary surplus is the
portion of the total capital gain equal to the increase in the
relevant assets value that is attributable to the increase
in the Israeli CPI between the date of purchase and the date of
sale. The real gain is the excess of the total capital gain over
the inflationary surplus. A non-resident that invests in taxable
assets with foreign currency, or any individual that holds
securities the price of which is stated in foreign currency, may
elect to calculate the amount of inflationary surplus in that
foreign currency.
|
|
|
Taxation of Israeli Residents |
As of January 1, 2006, pursuant to an amendment of the Tax
Ordinance, the tax rate applicable to real capital gains derived
from the sale of shares, whether listed on a stock market or
not, is 20% for Israeli individuals, unless such shareholder
claims a deduction for financing expenses in connection with
such shares, in which case the gain will generally be taxed at a
rate of 25%. Additionally, if such shareholder is considered to
be a significant shareholder at any time during the
12-month period
preceding such sale, the tax rate will be 25%. For this purpose,
a significant shareholder is one that holds, directly or
indirectly, including with others, at least 10% of certain means
of control in a company. Israeli companies are generally subject
to the corporate tax rate (see above) on capital gains derived
from the sale of shares, unless such companies were not subject
to the Inflationary Adjustments Law (or certain regulations) at
the time of publication of the aforementioned amendment to the
Tax Ordinance that came into effect on January 1, 2006, in
which case the applicable tax rate is generally 25%.
|
|
|
Taxation of Non-Israeli Residents |
Non-Israeli residents are generally exempt from Israeli capital
gains tax on any gains derived from the sale of shares of
Israeli companies publicly traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
or a recognized stock exchange outside of Israel (including the
New York Stock Exchange), provided that such shareholders did
not acquire their shares prior to the issuers initial
public offering, that the gains were not derived from a
permanent establishment maintained by such shareholders in
Israel and that such shareholders are not subject to the
Inflationary Adjustments Law. Shareholders that do not engage in
activity in Israel generally should not be subject to such law.
127
However, a non-Israeli corporation will not be entitled to the
exemption from capital gains tax if an Israeli resident
(i) has a controlling interest of 25% or more in such
non-Israeli corporation or (ii) is the beneficiary of or is
entitled to 25% or more of the revenues or profits of such
non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly.
In addition, under the Convention between the Government of the
United States of America and the Government of Israel with
respect to Taxes on Income, as amended, referred to as the
U.S.-Israel tax treaty,
the sale of our ordinary shares by a shareholder who qualifies
as a resident of the United States within the meaning of the
U.S.-Israel tax treaty
and who is entitled to claim the benefits afforded to such
person by the
U.S.-Israel tax treaty,
referred to as a treaty U.S. resident, and who holds its
ordinary shares as a capital asset is also exempt from Israeli
capital gains tax unless either (i) the treaty
U.S. resident holds, directly or indirectly, shares
representing 10% or more of our voting power during any part of
the 12-month period
preceding such sale or (ii) the capital gains arising from
such sale are attributable to a permanent establishment of the
treaty U.S. resident that is located in Israel. However,
under the U.S.-Israel
tax treaty, a treaty U.S. resident would be permitted to
claim a credit for taxes paid in Israel against the
U.S. federal income tax imposed on the sale, subject to the
limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits.
The U.S.-Israel tax
treaty does not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.
|
|
|
Taxation of Dividends Paid on Our Ordinary Shares |
|
|
|
Taxation of Israeli Residents |
Israeli resident individuals are generally subject to Israeli
income tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary
shares at the rate of 20%, unless the recipient is a significant
shareholder (as defined above) in which case the applicable tax
rate will be 25%. The company distributing the dividend is
required to withhold tax at the source at the rate of 20%.
Israeli resident companies are generally exempt from income tax
on the receipt of dividends from another Israeli company, unless
the source of such dividends is located outside of Israel in
which case tax will generally apply at a rate of 25%.
|
|
|
Taxation of Non-Israeli Residents |
Non-residents of Israel are generally subject to Israeli income
tax on the receipt of dividends paid on our ordinary shares at
the rate of 20% unless the recipient is a significant
shareholder in which case the applicable tax rate will be 25%.
The company distributing the dividend is required to withhold
tax at the source at the rate of 20%.
Under the U.S.-Israel
tax treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld in Israel on
dividends paid to a holder of our ordinary shares who is a
treaty U.S. resident is 25%. Furthermore, the maximum rate
of withholding tax on dividends that are paid in certain
circumstances to a U.S. corporation holding 10% or more of
our outstanding voting power throughout the tax year in which
the dividend is distributed as well as the previous tax year, is
12.5%.
A non-resident of Israel who has dividend income derived from or
accrued in Israel, from which tax was withheld at source, is
generally exempt from the duty to file tax returns in Israel in
respect of such income, provided such income was not derived
from a business conducted in Israel by such non-Israeli resident.
128
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Future sales of substantial amounts of our ordinary shares in
the public market could adversely affect market prices for our
ordinary shares. Furthermore, because only a limited number of
shares will be available for sale shortly after this offering
due to existing contractual and legal restrictions on resale as
described below, there may be sales of substantial amounts of
our ordinary shares in the public market after the restrictions
lapse. This may adversely affect the prevailing market price and
our ability to raise equity capital in the future.
Upon completion of this offering, we will have 97,500,000
ordinary shares outstanding assuming no exercise of any
outstanding options. Of these shares, the
20,000,000 shares, or 23,000,000 shares if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, sold
in this offering will be freely transferable without restriction
or registration under the Securities Act, except for any shares
purchased by one of our existing affiliates, as that
term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The
remaining 77,500,000 ordinary shares were issued under
Regulation S or in private placements more than two years
ago, principally to our affiliates. Shares not held by our
affiliates, approximately 19,987,500 million shares as of
December 31, 2006, are freely tradeable. The remaining
57,512,500 shares are held by our affiliates and may be sold in
the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an
exemption from registration under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act. As a result of the contractual
180-day
lock-up period
described below and the provisions of Rules 144, these
shares will be available for sale in the public market as
follows:
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Date |
|
|
|
5,362,500(1)
|
|
On the date of this prospectus |
72,137,500
|
|
After 180 days from the date of this prospectus (subject,
in some cases, to volume limitations) |
|
|
(1) |
Holders of these shares are restricted from transferring their
shares without the prior consent of DIC, which has undertaken
toward the underwriters of this offering not to grant such
consent during the lock-up period. |
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after this offering, a person, or persons
whose shares are aggregated, who is our affiliate, is entitled
to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that
does not exceed the greater of 1% of our then-outstanding
ordinary shares, which will equal 975,000 shares
immediately after this offering, or the average weekly trading
volume of our ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange
during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice
of the sale on Form 144. Sales under Rule 144 are also
subject to manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and
the availability of current public information about us. We are
unable to estimate the number of shares that will be sold under
Rule 144 since this will depend on the market price for our
ordinary shares, the personal circumstances of the shareholder
and other factors.
Registration Rights
Upon completion of this offering, the holders of 72,137,500
ordinary shares and 2,414,143 ordinary shares issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding options or their transferees, will be
entitled to various rights with respect to the registration of
these shares under the Securities Act. Registration of these
shares under the Securities Act would result in these shares
becoming freely tradable without restriction under the
Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the
registration, except for shares purchased by affiliates.
Upon the sale of shares by DIC to Goldman Sachs International on
March 15, 2006, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with Goldman Sachs International, DIC and two other
129
shareholders who are subsidiaries of DIC on customary terms and
conditions. Upon the subsequent sales of shares by DIC to Migdal
Insurance Company Ltd. and certain of its affiliates,
Leumi & Co. Investment House Ltd. (an affiliate of Bank
Leumi Le-Israel Ltd), and Stocofin (Israel) Ltd. (an affiliate
of the First International Bank of Israel Ltd.), these
shareholders also joined the registration rights agreement. We
refer to DIC, its two subsidiaries and these new shareholders as
the registration rights holders. The shares eligible for
registration under the agreement are ordinary shares held by the
registration rights holders as of the respective dates they
entered into the registration rights agreement and any
additional ordinary shares such holders may thereafter acquire,
so long as they are held by a registration rights holder or a
permitted transferee (a person directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control
with such registration rights holder) thereof.
Commencing 18 months from the effectiveness of this
offering, the registration rights holders are entitled to one
demand registration per
12-month period, so
long as such request is initiated by registration rights holders
of at least 3.25% of the then outstanding registrable securities
and the demand refers to a minimum of 3% of our then outstanding
share capital, subject to customary deferral rights. In
addition, in connection with this offering and any public
offerings that we initiate in the future, if we propose to
register any of our securities for our own account or for the
account of any of our shareholders other than in a demand
registration or in a registration relating solely to an
incentive plan, the registration rights holders have piggyback
rights to include their shares subject to customary
underwriters cutback rights. In the case of a cut back,
each registration rights holder that is not a member of the IDB
group will be entitled to register registrable shares in an
amount equal to its percentage holding of the aggregate number
of registrable shares held by all registration rights holders
wishing to participate in such registration, or, if such
registration rights holder then holds more than 20% of its
holdings as of the date it signed the registration rights
agreement, registrable shares in an amount equal to twice its
percentage holding of the aggregate number of registrable shares
held by all registration rights holders wishing to participate
in such registration. Members of the IDB group will be entitled
to register a number of registrable shares equal to the
aggregate number of registrable shares to be included in the
registration, less the registrable shares of all the other
registration rights holders being registered pursuant to the
foregoing calculation.
All registration rights terminate, with respect to any
individual registration rights holder, at such time as all
registrable shares of such holder may be sold without
registration pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act
during any three-month period. We are required to pay all
expenses incurred in carrying out the above registrations, as
well as the reasonable fees and expenses of one legal counsel
for the selling registration rights holders, except for
underwriter discounts and commissions with respect to the shares
of such holders. The agreement provides for customary
indemnification and contribution provisions.
Stock Options
As of September 30, 2006, no options to purchase ordinary
shares were outstanding. In October and November 2006, we
granted options to our chairman, officers and senior employees
purchase an aggregate of 2,414,143 ordinary shares. All of the
shares subject to options are subject to
lock-up agreements. An
additional 85,857 ordinary shares were available for future
option grants under our stock plans.
Upon completion of this offering, we intend to file a
registration statement on
Form S-8 under the
Securities Act covering all ordinary shares subject to
outstanding options or issuable pursuant to our 2006 Share
Incentive Plan. Shares registered under this
Form S-8
registration statement will be available for sale in the open
market, subject to Rule 144 volume limitations applicable
to affiliates, vesting restrictions or the contractual
restrictions described below.
130
Lock-up
Agreements
Our officers, directors and substantially all of our
shareholders, who will hold an aggregate of
72,137,500 ordinary shares and approximately
2.4 million ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options following the offering, have agreed, subject
to limited exceptions, not to offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge (other than by way of a floating lien on all of a
shareholders assets), or otherwise dispose of, any
ordinary shares or any other securities of us that are
substantially similar to our ordinary shares, including, but not
limited to any securities that are convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for, or represent the right to
receive, ordinary shares or any such substantially similar
securities for a period of 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, without the prior written consent of the
underwriters, subject to certain exceptions.
131
UNDERWRITING
We, the selling shareholders, and the underwriters named below
intend to enter into an underwriting agreement with respect to
the ordinary shares being offered. Subject to certain
conditions, each underwriter will severally agree to purchase
the number of ordinary shares indicated in the following table.
Goldman, Sachs & Co., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.
and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. are the representatives of
the underwriters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Ordinary | |
Underwriters |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
8,274,000 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
3,916,000 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.
|
|
|
3,916,000 |
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
Jefferies & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
1,258,000 |
|
William Blair & Company, LLC
|
|
|
836,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriters will
commit, subject to certain conditions, to take and pay for all
of the ordinary shares being offered, other than the ordinary
shares covered by the option described below unless and until
this option is exercised.
If the underwriters sell more ordinary shares than the total
number set forth in the table above, the underwriters have an
option to buy up to an additional 3,000,000 ordinary shares from
the selling shareholders to cover such sales. They may exercise
that option for 30 days from the date of the underwriting
agreement. If any ordinary shares are purchased pursuant to this
option, the underwriters will severally purchase such ordinary
shares in approximately the same proportion as set forth in the
table above.
The following tables show the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by the
selling shareholders. Such amounts are shown assuming both no
exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase 3,000,000 additional ordinary shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per Share
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
26,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
29,900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares sold by the underwriters to the public will
initially be offered at the initial public offering price set
forth on the cover of this prospectus. Any ordinary shares sold
by the underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a
discount of up to $0.78 per share from the initial public
offering price. If not all the ordinary shares offered are sold
at the initial public offering price, the representatives may
change the offering price and the other selling terms.
We and our officers, directors, and holders of substantially all
of our issued share capital, including the selling shareholders,
have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain
exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of our or their
ordinary shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable
for ordinary shares during the period from the date of this
prospectus continuing through the date 180 days after the
date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent
of the representatives. This agreement does not apply to any
existing employee benefit plans and is subject to certain
exceptions. See Shares Eligible for Future Sale for
a discussion of certain transfer restrictions.
132
The 180-day restricted
period described in the preceding paragraph will, in most cases,
be automatically extended if: (1) during the last
17 days of the
180-day restricted
period we issue an earnings release or announce material news or
a material event; or (2) prior to the expiration of the
180-day restricted
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 15-day period
following the last day of the
180-day period, in
which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph
will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day period beginning
on the issuance of the earnings release of the announcement of
the material news or material event.
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the
ordinary shares. The initial public offering price will be
negotiated between us, the selling shareholders and the
representatives, on behalf of the underwriters. Among the
factors to be considered in determining the initial public
offering price of the ordinary shares, in addition to prevailing
market conditions, will be our historical performance, estimates
of our business potential and earnings prospects, an assessment
of our management and the consideration of the above factors in
relation to market valuation of companies in related businesses.
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts
to exceed 5% of the total number of ordinary shares offered.
We have been authorized to list our ordinary shares on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol CEL.
We and the selling shareholders have each agreed to indemnify
the several underwriters against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, and to contribute
to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect
of such liabilities.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell ordinary shares in the open market. These transactions
may include short sales, stabilizing transactions and purchases
to cover positions created by short sales. Shorts sales involve
the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of ordinary
shares than they are required to purchase in the offering.
Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not
greater than the underwriters option to purchase
additional ordinary shares from the selling shareholders in the
offering. The underwriters may close out any covered short
position by either exercising their option to purchase
additional ordinary shares or purchasing ordinary shares in the
open market. In determining the source of ordinary shares to
close out the covered short position, the underwriters will
consider, among other things, the price of ordinary shares
available for purchase in the open market as compared to the
price at which they may purchase additional ordinary shares
pursuant to the option granted to them. Naked short
sales are any sales in excess of such option. The underwriters
must close out any naked short position by purchasing ordinary
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may
be downward pressure on the price of the ordinary shares in the
open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors
who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist
of various bids for or purchases of ordinary shares made by the
underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of the
offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased ordinary shares sold by or for
the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing
transactions, as well as other purchases by the underwriters for
their own accounts, may have the effect of preventing or
retarding a decline in the market price of the ordinary shares,
and together with the imposition of the penalty bid, may
stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the
ordinary shares. As a result, the price of the ordinary shares
may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in
133
the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be
discontinued at any time. These transactions may be effected on
the New York Stock Exchange, in the
over-the-counter market
or otherwise.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates
have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future
perform, various financial advisory and investment banking
services for us, for which they received or will receive
customary fees and expenses. In March 2006, we entered into an
unsecured credit facility arranged by Citibank N.A. and Citibank
International plc, affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.,
which provides for a term loan of $280 million and a
revolving credit facility of up to $70 million. We also
have from time to time credit facilities with Bank Hapoalim
Ltd., which is party to certain arrangements with William
Blair & Company, and with Bank Leumi Le Israel Ltd., an
affiliate of Leumi & Co. Investment House Ltd.
Goldman Sachs International, an affiliate of Goldman,
Sachs & Co., owns 4,875,000 ordinary shares and
Leumi & Co. Investment House Ltd., which is party to
certain arrangements with Jeffries & Company, Inc.,
owns 4,875,000 ordinary shares.
It is possible that DIC, our majority shareholder, and one of
the selling shareholders in this offering, may be regarded as an
underwriter as this term is understood under the Securities Act
of 1933.
Selling Restrictions
Each of the underwriters has represented and agreed that:
|
|
|
(a) it has not made or will not make an offer of ordinary
shares to the public in the United Kingdom within the meaning of
section 102B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
(as amended) (FSMA) except to legal entities which are
authorised or regulated to operate in the financial markets or,
if not so authorised or regulated, whose corporate purpose is
solely to invest in securities or otherwise in circumstances
which do not require the publication by us of a prospectus
pursuant to the Prospectus Rules of the Financial Services
Authority (FSA); |
|
|
(b) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of section 21 of FSMA) to persons who
have professional experience in matters relating to investments
falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 or in
circumstances in which section 21 of FSMA does not
apply; and |
|
|
(c) it has complied with, and will comply with all
applicable provisions of FSMA with respect to anything done by
it in relation to the ordinary shares in, from or otherwise
involving the United Kingdom. |
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant
Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that
with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus
Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the
Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make
an offer of ordinary shares to the public in that Relevant
Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in
relation to the ordinary shares which has been approved by the
competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where
appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and
notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive, except
that it may, with effect from and including
134
the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of ordinary
shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
|
|
|
(a) to legal entities which are authorised or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorised or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities; |
|
|
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the last
financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than
50,000,000, as
shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts; or |
|
|
(c) in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive. |
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of ordinary shares to the public in relation
to any ordinary shares in any Relevant Member State means the
communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the ordinary shares to
be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe the ordinary shares, as the same may be varied in that
Relevant Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus
Directive in that Relevant Member State and the expression
Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/ EC and includes
any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.
The ordinary shares may not be offered or sold by means of any
document other than (i) in circumstances which do not
constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the
Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (ii) to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement,
invitation or document relating to the ordinary shares may be
issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose
of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which
is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be
accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if
permitted to do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with
respect to ordinary shares which are or are intended to be
disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder.
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the
Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus
and any other document or material in connection with the offer
or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the
ordinary shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may
the ordinary shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject
of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly
or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an
institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities
and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore, or SFA,
(ii) to a relevant person, or any person pursuant to
Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions,
specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (iii) otherwise
pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other
applicable provision of the SFA.
Where the ordinary shares are subscribed or purchased under
Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a) a
corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole
business of
135
which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of
which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an
accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the trustee is
not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold
investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor,
shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that
corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest in
that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after
that corporation or that trust has acquired the ordinary shares
under Section 275 except: (1) to an institutional
investor under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant
person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in
accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of
the SFA; (2) where no consideration is given for the
transfer; or (3) by operation of law.
This prospectus has not been filed with or approved by the
Israel Securities Authority. In Israel, this prospectus is being
distributed only to, and is directed at, investors listed in the
first addendum, or the Addendum, to the Securities Law, mainly,
joint investment funds, provident funds, insurance companies,
banks, portfolio managers, investment advisors, members of the
Tel Aviv Stock Exchange purchasing for their own account
themselves, underwriters purchasing for their own account,
venture capital funds and corporations with a shareholders
equity in excess of NIS 250 million, each as defined in the
Addendum, collectively referred to as institutional investors.
Institutional investors may be required to submit written
confirmation that they fall within the scope of the Addendum. In
addition, we and/or the underwriters may distribute and direct
this prospectus, at their sole discretion, to investors who do
not fall within one of the definitions in the Addendum, provided
that the number of such investors shall be no greater than 35 in
any 12-month period.
The ordinary shares have not been and will not be registered
under the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan (the Securities
and Exchange Law) and each of the underwriters has represented
and agreed that it will not offer or sell any ordinary shares,
directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of,
any resident of Japan (which term as used herein means any
person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other
entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others for
re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to a
resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with,
the Securities and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws,
regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
136
EXPENSES RELATED TO THE OFFERING
Set forth below is an itemization of the total expenses,
excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, that we expect
to incur in connection with this offering. The selling
shareholders have agreed to reimburse us for expenses incurred
in connection with the offering. With the exception of the SEC
registration fee and the NYSE filing fee, all amounts are
estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
to be Paid | |
|
|
| |
Registration fee
|
|
$ |
44,551 |
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
46,500 |
|
NYSE listing fee
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Transfer agents fees
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
745,000 |
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
950,000 |
|
Blue Sky fees and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,780,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
VALIDITY OF ORDINARY SHARES
The validity of the shares offered hereby and certain other
matters will be passed upon for Cellcom by Davis Polk &
Wardwell, New York, New York and by Goldfarb, Levy, Eran,
Meiri & Co., Tel Aviv, Israel, our New York and Israeli
counsel, respectively. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, New York, New York and Naschitz, Brandes &
Co., Tel Aviv, Israel, will act as New York and Israeli counsel,
respectively, for the underwriters.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Cellcom Israel Ltd. and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2005 have been included herein and in the
registration statement in reliance on the report of Somekh
Chaikin, an independent registered public accounting firm and a
member firm of KPMG International, appearing elsewhere herein,
and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing. The report of Somekh Chaikin contains emphasis
paragraphs regarding the following: (1) the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 have been translated into United States
dollars solely for the convenience of the reader. The
consolidated financial statements expressed in NIS have been
translated into dollars on the basis set forth in note 2 of
the notes to the consolidated financial statements and
(2) as explained in Note 2B to our consolidated
financial statements, the consolidated financial statements, as
of dates and for reporting periods subsequent to
December 31, 2003, are presented in New Israeli Shekels, in
conformity with accounting standards issued by the Israel
Accounting Standards Board. The consolidated financial
statements for the reporting periods ended prior to, or on the
above date, are presented in values that have been adjusted for
the changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli
currency through that date, in accordance with pronouncements of
the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Israel.
ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel.
Service of process upon us and upon our directors and officers
and the Israeli experts named in this prospectus, all of whom
137
reside outside the United States, may be difficult to
obtain within the United States. Furthermore, because all of our
assets and all of our directors and officers are located outside
the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States
against us or any of our directors and officers may not be
collectible within the United States.
We have been informed by our legal counsel in Israel, Goldfarb,
Levy, Eran, Meiri & Co., that it may be difficult to
assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions
instituted in Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim
based on a violation of U.S. securities laws because Israel
is not the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In
addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it
may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is
applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be
applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be
proved as a fact, which can be a time-consuming and costly
process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by
Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel
addressing these matters.
Subject to specified time limitations and legal procedures,
under the rules of private international law currently
prevailing in Israel, Israeli courts may enforce a final
U.S. judgment in a civil matter, including judgments based
upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities
laws and including a monetary or compensatory judgment in a
non-civil matter, provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
the judgment is enforceable in the state in which it was given; |
|
|
|
adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant
has had a reasonable opportunity to present his arguments and
evidence; |
|
|
|
the judgment and the enforcement of the judgment are not
contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of
the State of Israel; |
|
|
|
the judgment was not obtained by fraud and does not conflict
with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the
same parties; and |
|
|
|
an action between the same parties in the same matter is not
pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit is
instituted in the foreign court. |
We have irrevocably appointed CT Corporation System as our agent
to receive service of process in any action against us in any
federal court or court of the State of New York arising out of
this offering.
If a foreign judgment is enforced by an Israeli court, it
generally will be payable in Israeli currency, which can then be
converted into non-Israeli currency and transferred out of
Israel. The usual practice in an action before an Israeli court
to recover an amount in a non-Israeli currency is for the
Israeli court to issue a judgment for the equivalent amount in
Israeli currency at the rate of exchange in force on the date of
the judgment, but the judgment debtor may make payment in
foreign currency. Pending collection, the amount of the judgment
of an Israeli court stated in Israeli currency ordinarily will
be linked to the Israeli CPI plus interest at the annual
statutory rate set by Israeli regulations prevailing at the
time. Judgment creditors must bear the risk of unfavorable
exchange rate fluctuations.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549, a
registration statement on
Form F-1 under the
Securities Act with respect to the ordinary shares offered
hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the information
set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules thereto. For further information with respect to
Cellcom and our ordinary shares, reference is made to the
registration statement and the exhibits and any schedules filed
therewith. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the
contents of any contract or other document referred to are not
necessarily complete and in each instance, if such contract or
document is filed as an exhibit, reference is made to the copy
of such contract or other
138
document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each
statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. A
copy of the registration statement, including the exhibits and
schedules thereto, may be read and copied at the SECs
Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. In
addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains
reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers,
like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of
that site is www.sec.gov.
As a result of the offering, we will be subject to the
information reporting requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to as the Exchange
Act, applicable to foreign private issuers. As a foreign private
issuer, we are exempt from certain rules and regulations under
the Exchange Act prescribing the content of proxy statements,
and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are
exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery
provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act,
with respect to their purchase and sale of our ordinary shares.
In addition, we are not required to file reports and financial
statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as
U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the
Exchange Act. However, we will file with the SEC an annual
report on
Form 20-F
containing financial statements audited by an independent
accounting firm. We also intend to furnish reports on
Form 6-K
containing unaudited financial information for the first three
quarters of each fiscal year and other material information, as
we are required to provide that information to the Tel Aviv
Stock Exchange, since our debt securities are listed on the Tel
Aviv Stock Exchange.
139
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To The Shareholders of
Cellcom Israel Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Cellcom Israel Ltd. (hereinafter the
Company) as at September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, statements of changes in
shareholders equity and statements of cash flows for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and for each of
the three years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys Board of Directors and management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Board of Directors and management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Company as at September 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated result of operations, the changes in the
shareholders equity and the consolidated cash flows for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and for each
of the three years in the three-year period ended on
December 31, 2005, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in Israel.
Accounting principles generally accepted in Israel vary in
certain significant respects from accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Information
related to the nature and effect of such differences is
presented in Note 28 of the financial statements.
As explained in Note 2B, the financial statements, as of
dates and for reporting periods subsequent to December 31,
2003, are presented in New Israeli Shekels, in conformity with
accounting standards issued by the Israel Accounting Standards
Board. The financial statements for the reporting periods ended
prior to, or on the above date, are presented in values that
have been adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing
power of the Israeli currency through that date, in accordance
with pronouncements of the Institute of Certified Public
Accountants in Israel.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been
translated into United States dollars solely for the convenience
of the reader. We have audited the translation and, in our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements expressed in NIS
have been translated into dollars on the basis set forth in
Note 2C of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
December 14, 2006, except for Note 17A.18,
Note 17A.19 and Note 18C
as to which the date is January 30, 2007
F-2
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
Note | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
NIS | |
|
NIS | |
|
US$ | |
|
NIS | |
|
US$ | |
|
|
|
|
(All amounts are in millions except for share and per share | |
|
|
|
|
data) | |
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311 |
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term bank credit
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from banks
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Debentures
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 10,000,000 shares at
December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, and at
September 30, 2006; Issued and outstanding
114,000 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2005,
respectively, and at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311 |
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
F-3
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Income Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Month | |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
Note | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NIS (Note 2B) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
|
|
|
NIS (Note 2B) | |
|
|
|
|
(All amounts are in millions except for share and per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Income tax
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share in NIS (see Note 2T)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares used in the calculation of
basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
F-4
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend | |
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
Share Capital | |
|
|
|
Declared | |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Subsequent | |
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Capital | |
|
to Balance | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Reserve | |
|
Sheet Date | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS 0.1 | |
|
|
|
US$ Millions | |
|
|
par value | |
|
NIS Millions (Note 2B) | |
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2003
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Changes in the year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
Changes in the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
Changes in the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in capital reserve in respect of hedging transactions,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cash dividend declared subsequent to balance sheet date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in capital reserve in respect of hedging transactions,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Dividend paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(3,830 |
) |
|
|
(890 |
) |
Net income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2005
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in capital reserve in respect of hedging transactions,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend declared subsequent to balance sheet date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income of the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
F-5
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine-Month | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
|
NIS (Note 2B) | |
|
|
|
NIS (Note 2B) | |
|
|
|
|
(All amounts are in millions) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Addition required to present cash flows from operating
activities(a)
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Long-term deposit
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in other assets
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments under short-term bank credit facility
|
|
|
(25,616 |
) |
|
|
(9,269 |
) |
|
|
(4,953 |
) |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
(4,817 |
) |
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Borrowings under short-term bank credit facility
|
|
|
25,168 |
|
|
|
9,328 |
|
|
|
4,894 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Borrowings of long-term loans from banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Payment of long-term loans from banks
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of debentures, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Paid dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,830 |
) |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
Balance of cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements. |
F-6
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience | |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation | |
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into | |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 2C) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine-Month | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
Period Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
|
|
US$ | |
|
|
NIS (Note 2B) | |
|
|
|
NIS (Note 2B) | |
|
|
|
|
(All amounts are in millions) | |
(a) Adjustments required to present cash flows from
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expenses not involving cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Exchange and linkage differences on long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Capital losses (gains)
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in liability for employee severance pay
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for decline in value of land held for sale
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in trade receivables (including long-term amounts)
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other receivables (including long-term
amounts)
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in trade payables (including long-term
amounts)
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other payables and credits (including
long-term amounts)
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Non-cash activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment and other assets on
credit
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables in respect of issuance of debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
F-7
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial Statements
Note 1 General
Cellcom Israel Ltd. (the Company) was incorporated
in Israel on January 31, 1994. The Company commenced its
operations on June 27, 1994, after receiving a license from
the Ministry of Communications (the MOC) to
establish, operate and maintain a cellular mobile telephone
system and provide cellular mobile telephone services in Israel.
The Company began providing cellular mobile telephone services
to the Israeli public on December 27, 1994. The initial
license granted to the Company was for a period of 10 years
and was thereafter extended until the year 2022.
On September 21, 2005, a shareholders transaction was
completed for the purchase of 69.5% of the Companys shares
by Discount Investments Ltd. (DIC), member of the
IDB Group companies, which at that time held 25% of the
Companys issued shares through its subsidiaries. Following
the said transaction, DIC held approximately 94.5% of the
Companys issued shares, and 100% of the Companys
voting rights. During 2006, DIC sold 16% of the Companys
issued shares in 4 transactions to financial investors and
currently holds approximately 78.5% of the Companys issued
shares and 84.0% of the voting rights.
Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies
These financial statements are prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in Israel
(Israeli GAAP), which differ in certain material
respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America (US GAAP) see
Note 28.
1. The functional currency of the Company is the local
currency, New Israeli Shekels (NIS). The Company
prepares and presents its financial statements in NIS.
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded at
the prevailing exchange rate at the time of the transactions.
2. Transition to nominal financial reporting in 2004
Through December 31, 2003, the Company prepared its
financial statements on the basis of historical cost adjusted
for the changes in the general purchasing power of Israeli
currency - NIS, based upon changes in the Israeli consumer
price index (CPI), in accordance with pronouncements
of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Israel.
Certain components of the income statement for 2003 were
adjusted as follows: the components relating to transactions
carried out during the reported period sales,
purchases, labor costs and others were adjusted on
the basis of the CPI index for the month in which the
transaction was carried out, while those relating to
non-monetary balance sheet items (mainly changes in
inventories and depreciation and amortization) were adjusted on
the same basis as the related balance sheet item. The financing
component represents financial income or expense in real terms
and the erosion of balances of monetary items during the period.
With effect from January 1, 2004, the Company has adopted
the provisions of Israel Accounting Standard
No. 12 Discontinuance of Adjusting
Financial Statements for Inflation of the
Israel Accounting Standards Board and, pursuant thereto, the
Company has discontinued, from that date, the adjustment of its
financial statements for the effects of inflation in Israel.
F-8
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
The amounts adjusted for the effects of inflation in Israel,
presented in the financial statements as of December 31,
2003, were used as the opening balances for the nominal
financial reporting in the following periods. Accordingly, the
amounts reported in these financial statements that relate to
non-monetary assets (including the depreciation and amortization
thereon) and equity items, which originate from the period that
preceded January 1, 2004, are based on the
adjusted-for-inflation data (based on the CPI for December
2003), as previously reported.
Amounts originating during periods subsequent to
December 31, 2003 are included in the financial statements
based on their nominal values.
The amounts of non-monetary assets do not necessarily represent
realization value or current economic value, but only the
reported amounts of such assets. In these financial statements,
the term cost refers to cost in reported amounts.
3. Effect of changes in the CPI and in foreign currency
exchange rates
Data regarding the CPI and currency exchange rates are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CPI (in points)
|
|
|
178.6 |
|
|
|
180.7 |
|
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
184.1 |
|
|
|
186.5 |
|
Exchange rate of U.S.$ in NIS
|
|
|
4.379 |
|
|
|
4.308 |
|
|
|
4.603 |
|
|
|
4.598 |
|
|
|
4.302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 to | |
|
January 1 to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CPI
|
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Exchange rate of U.S.$ in NIS
|
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
(6.5 |
)% |
|
|
C. |
Convenience translation into U.S. dollars
(dollars or $) |
For the convenience of the reader, the reported NIS figures as
of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended, and as of
September 30, 2006 and the nine months then ended have been
presented in dollars, translated at the representative rate of
exchange as of September 30, 2006 (NIS 4.302 = US$1.00).
The dollar amounts presented in these financial statements
should not be construed as representing amounts that are
receivable or payable in dollars or convertible into dollars,
unless otherwise indicated.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period.
These estimates are based on experience and historical data;
however, actual results could differ from these estimates.
F-9
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
E. |
Principles of consolidation |
These consolidated financial statements include consolidation of
the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries
which all are fully owned. All inter-company transactions and
balances were eliminated upon consolidation.
|
|
F. |
Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include bank deposits, the initial
deposit term of which did not exceed three months, and that are
not restricted as to withdrawal or use.
|
|
G. |
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
The financial statements include an allowance for doubtful
accounts which properly reflects, in managements
estimation, the potential loss from non-collection of accounts.
The Company provides for doubtful accounts on the basis of its
experience in collecting past debts, as well as on the basis of
information on specific debtors in the hands of management of
the Company.
Inventory of cellular phone equipment and accessories and
spare-parts are stated at the lower of cost or market value.
Cost is determined by the moving average method; market value is
determined using current replacement cost, less provisions for
decline in value for slow moving inventory.
|
|
I. |
Property, plant and equipment |
(1) Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost,
including direct costs necessary to prepare the asset for its
intended use.
(2) See Note 2O for discussion of interest costs
capitalized to property, plant and equipment.
(3) Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as
incurred. The cost of significant renewals and improvements is
capitalized to the carrying amount of the respective fixed asset.
(4) The Company capitalizes certain costs incurred in
connection with developing or obtaining internal use software in
accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for
the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for
Internal Use of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. Capitalized costs include direct development costs
associated with internal use software, including internal direct
labor costs and external costs of materials and services. These
capitalized software costs are included in Property, plant
and equipment in the consolidated balance sheets and are
amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of
4 years. Costs incurred during the preliminary project
stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed
as incurred.
F-10
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
(5) Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line
method, on the basis of the estimated useful lives of the
dominant asset within each group of assets. The annual
depreciation rates are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Network and transmission equipment
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
Control and testing equipment
|
|
|
15-25 |
|
|
(Mainly 25%) |
Vehicles
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
Computers and software
|
|
|
15-33 |
|
|
(Mainly 25%) |
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
6-15 |
|
|
(Mainly 7%) |
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their
estimated useful lives or the expected lease terms.
See Note 2U(3) for the expected impact of adoption of the
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 27, Property, plant
and equipment, starting January 1, 2007.
The Company reviews at each balance sheet date whether any
events have occurred or changes in circumstances have taken
place, that might indicate that there has been an impairment to
the carrying value of all assets except inventory, tax assets
and monetary assets.
When such indicators of impairment are present, the Company
evaluates whether the carrying value of the asset in the
Companys accounts can be recovered from the cash flows
anticipated from that asset, and, if necessary, records an
impairment provision up to the amount needed to adjust the
carrying amount to the recoverable amount.
The recoverable value of an asset is determined according to the
higher of the net selling price of the asset or its value in use
to the Company. The value in use is determined according to the
present value of anticipated cash flows from the continued use
of the asset, including those expected at the time of its future
retirement and disposal. In determining the value in use of an
asset, the Company uses the best available estimates as to the
conditions that will prevail during the remaining useful life of
the asset. In determining the net selling price of an asset,
management relies on estimates of the Companys experts.
There were no impairments in any of periods presented, other
than the impairment of land held for sale, see Note 8A.
Other assets consist of licenses and deferred expenses. Spectrum
licenses are stated at cost and are amortized over their
estimated useful lives by the straight-line method starting at
the time such spectrum licenses were put into service and will
continue until the expiry date of the licenses in 2022. License
costs also include an upfront fee paid in respect of the right
to use the i-mode brand name and technology which is amortized
over its 10 year term starting September 1, 2005.
Interest costs for the financing of the license fees incurred
before the commencement of utilization of the licenses were
capitalized to cost of the license, see Note 2O.
Deferred expenses in respect of the issuance of debentures are
amortized using the effective interest rate method over the life
of the debentures. Regarding the reclassification of these
issuance costs as of January 1, 2006, see Note 2R.
F-11
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues from sales of handsets and accessories that are not
contingent upon the delivery of additional products or services
are recognized when products are delivered to and accepted by
customers. Revenues from long-term credit arrangements (longer
than one year) are recognized on the basis of the present value
of future cash flows, discounted according to market interest
rates at the time of the transaction. The difference between the
original credit and its present value is recorded as interest
income over the credit period.
Revenues derived from usage of the Companys networks,
including airtime, interconnect and roaming revenues are
recognized when the services are provided.
Prepaid wireless airtime sold to customers is recorded as
deferred revenue prior to the commencement of services and is
recognized when the airtime is used or expires.
The Company offers enhanced services including voice mail, text
and picture messaging, as well as downloadable wireless data
applications, including ringtones, music, games, and other
informational content. Generally, these enhanced features and
data applications generate additional service revenues through
monthly subscription fees or increased usage through utilization
of the features and applications. Other optional services, such
as equipment warranty plans are also provided for a monthly fee
and are either sold separately or bundled and included in
packaged rate plans. Revenues from enhanced features and
optional services are recognized when earned.
Costs of revenues mainly include ongoing license fees,
interconnection and roaming expenses, cell site leases,
depreciation and amortization charges and technical, repair and
maintenance expenses directly related to services rendered.
The Company pays distributors commissions to connect new
subscribers and upgrade existing ones. These incentives are
accounted for as an expense upon the connection or upgrade of
the subscriber.
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Israel Accounting
Standard No. 25, Revenue (Standard
No. 25). This standard prescribes recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure criteria for revenues
originating from the sale of goods purchased or manufactured by
the seller, the provision of services, as well as revenues
derived from the use of the sellers assets by others
(interest income, royalties or dividends) and revenue
arrangements with multiple deliverables. Standard No. 25 is
applicable to all transactions entered into on or after
January 1, 2006.
In accordance with Standard No. 25, the principal issue in
accounting for revenue is determining the timing of revenue
recognition. Revenue from the sale of goods is recognized when
all the following conditions have been satisfied: (a) the
significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have
been transferred to the buyer; (b) the seller retains
neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually
associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods
sold; (c) the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;
(d) it is probable that the economic benefits associated
with the transaction will flow to the seller; and (e) the
costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction
can be measured reliably.
A clarification of Standard No. 25 was issued in February
2006: Clarification No. 8, Reporting of Revenue on a
Gross or Net Basis. According to the clarification, a
company acting as an agent or an intermediary without bearing
the risks and rewards resulting from the transaction, will
present its revenue on a net basis (as a profit or a
commission). However, a company that acts as a principal
supplier and bears the risks and rewards resulting from the
F-12
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
transaction will present its revenue on a gross basis,
distinguishing the revenue from the related expenses. This
classification and presentation of revenue on a gross or net
basis was applied with retroactive effect for all of the
reported periods.
The initial implementation of Standard No. 25 and the
Clarification No. 8 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial position.
|
|
M. |
Discounts from suppliers |
Supplier discounts that are contingent on the Company meeting
certain targets, such as making purchases in a minimum annual
amount (quantity or monetary amount) are accounted for in the
financial statements on a pro rata basis based on the scope of
the purchases made by the Company from the suppliers in the
reported period that advance the Company toward meeting the
targets, this being only if it is probable that the targets will
ultimately be reached and the amounts of the discounts can be
reasonably estimated. Estimation of meeting the targets is based
on, among other things, past experience and the Companys
relationships with the suppliers, as well as on the scope of the
anticipated purchases from the suppliers during the balance of
the period.
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
totaled NIS 116 million, NIS 138 million and NIS
118 million, respectively, and for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 totaled NIS
91 million and NIS 65 million, respectively.
|
|
O. |
Capitalization of financing costs |
Financing costs associated with the cost of constructing the
wireless networks during the initial construction phase and the
cost of acquiring the spectrum licenses until the beginning of
their intended use are capitalized to the cost of such assets.
The amount of financing costs eligible for capitalization is
determined by applying a capitalization rate to the expenditures
on the asset eligible for capitalization. The capitalization
rate is the weighted average of the financing costs applicable
to the borrowing and loans of the Company that are outstanding
during the period, or the rate applicable to a borrowing
specifically for the purpose of obtaining a specific asset. The
amount of financing costs capitalized during the reported
periods did not exceed the amount of financing costs incurred
during these periods.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the
amount of financing costs capitalized to property, plant and
equipment was NIS 4 million. During the years 2005, 2004
and 2003, no financing costs were capitalized to property, plant
and equipment. In 2004 and 2003, the amount of financing costs
capitalized to other assets (spectrum licenses) was NIS
8.5 million and NIS 9.2 million, respectively. The
average annual capitalization rate during the nine month period
ended September 30, 2006 was 7.9%. The average annual
capitalization rates during 2004 and 2003 were 7.11% and
8.1%, respectively.
Deferred taxes are calculated on the basis of the liability
method. Under this method, deferred taxes are computed in
respect of temporary differences between the carrying value of
assets and liabilities in the financial statements and their
values for tax purposes.
F-13
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Deferred taxes (asset or liability) are calculated at tax rates
that are expected to be in effect when the temporary differences
reverse, based on the tax rates and tax laws that were enacted
or the enactment of which has been effectively completed, up to
the balance sheet date.
In July 2004, the Israel Accounting Standards Board published
Israeli Accounting Standard No. 19, Taxes on
Income (Standard No. 19), which provides
that a liability for deferred taxes is to be recorded for all
temporary differences subject to tax, except for the temporary
difference resulting from the initial recognition of goodwill
and the temporary difference resulting from the initial
recognition of an asset or a liability that has no effect on
profit or loss. In addition, a deferred tax asset is to be
recorded for all temporary differences that may be deducted,
losses for tax purposes and tax benefits not yet utilized, if it
is anticipated that there will be taxable income against which
they can be offset. Standard No. 19 applies to financial
statements for periods beginning on January 1, 2005. The
transition to Standard No. 19 had no material effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial position.
|
|
Q. |
Freestanding derivative financial instruments |
The Company recognizes freestanding derivative financial
instruments as either assets or liabilities in its balance
sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. Accounting
for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the
intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.
For a foreign exchange derivative instrument designated as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative is
initially reported as a component of shareholders equity
as capital reserve and subsequently recognized into earnings as
the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the
derivative is recognized in earnings immediately. For derivative
instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges, changes
in fair value are recognized in earnings according to changes in
their fair value.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging
instruments and hedged items and the risk management objective
and strategy for each hedge transaction. At inception of the
hedge and quarterly thereafter, the Company performs a
correlation assessment to determine whether changes in the fair
values or cash flows of the derivatives are deemed highly
effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or cash flows
of the hedged items. If at any time subsequent to the inception
of the hedge, the correlation assessment indicates that the
derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, the Company
discontinues hedge accounting and recognizes all subsequent
derivative gains and losses in the results of operations.
|
|
R. |
Financial instruments and concentration of credit
risk |
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and other current assets and
liabilities are reasonable estimates of their fair value due to
the short-term nature of these instruments. See Note 26C
for the fair value of long-term receivables, loans and other
liabilities (including current maturities).
Financial instruments that could potentially subject the Company
to credit risks consist primarily of trade accounts receivables.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to these receivables
are limited due to the composition of the subscriber base, which
includes a large number of individuals and businesses.
As from January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Israeli
Accounting Standard No. 22, Financial Instruments:
Disclosure and Presentation (Standard No. 22),
which provides rules for presenting financial instruments in
financial statements and specifies the proper disclosures
required in respect thereto. Standard No. 22 provides the
method for classifying financial
F-14
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
instruments as financial liabilities and as shareholders
equity, for classifying the interest, dividends, losses and
gains related thereto, and the criteria for offsetting financial
assets and financial liabilities. Standard No. 22 was
adopted on a prospective basis. The transition to Standard
No. 22 resulted in the reclassification of deferred charges
in respect of the issuance of debentures from other assets to a
contra asset to the respective debentures.
|
|
S. |
Dividend declared subsequent to the balance sheet
date |
Dividends are recorded in the period they are declared. However,
to the extent a dividend is declared in a subsequent period, but
before the financial statements are issued, the amount
subsequently declared is appropriated within shareholders
equity in the current reporting period, as a designated part of
the retained earnings.
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with the
provisions of Israeli Accounting Standard No. 21,
Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is
calculated by dividing the earnings or loss attributable to the
ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the period. In order to calculate the
diluted earnings per share, the Company adjusts the earnings or
losses attributable to the ordinary shareholders, and the
weighted average number of outstanding ordinary shares, in
respect of the effects of all the dilutive potential ordinary
shares. For all reported periods, there were no outstanding
stock options or warrants, or other potentially dilutive
instruments. Regarding a stock split and an allotment of
dividend shares see Note 18B.
|
|
U. |
Effects of new Israeli Accounting Standards not yet
adopted |
1. Israeli Accounting Standard No. 29,
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) (Standard No. 29)
In July 2006, the Israel Accounting Standards Board published
Accounting Standard No. 29. The Standard provides that
entities subject to the Securities Law 1968 that are
required to report according to the regulations of this law are
to prepare their financial statements for periods beginning as
from January 1, 2008 according to IFRS. The Standard
permits early adoption as from financial statements released
after July 31, 2006.
The Company will adopt IFRS with effect from January 1,
2008, based upon the guidance in IFRS 1, First-time
adoption of IFRSs.
Upon adoption of IFRS, in 2008, the Company will be required to
present comparative financial statements as at and for the year
ended December 31, 2007, prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The Company is examining the effect of the adoption and
implementation of IFRS on its financial statements.
2. Israeli Accounting Standard No 26,
Inventory (Standard No. 26)
In August 2006, the Israel Accounting Standards Board published
Standard No. 26. The Standard provides guidelines for
determining the cost of inventory and its subsequent recognition
as an expense as well as for determining impairments in the
value of inventory written down to net realizable value. The
Standard also provides guidelines regarding cost formulas used
to allocate costs to various types of inventory. The Standard
will apply to financial statements for periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2007. Implementation of Standard
No. 26 is not
F-15
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
anticipated to have a material effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial position.
3. Israeli Accounting Standard No. 27,
Property, plant and equipment (Standard
No. 27)
In September 2006, the Israel Accounting Standards Board
published Standard No. 27. The Standard prescribes rules
for the presentation, measurement and recognition of property,
plant and equipment and for the disclosure required in respect
thereto. The Standard also provides for, among other things, the
following:
Standard No. 27 provides that a group of similar fixed
assets shall be measured at cost net of accumulated depreciation
minus impairment losses, or alternatively, at its revalued
amount less accumulated depreciation, whereas an increase in the
value of the asset above its initial cost as a result of the
revaluation will be directly included in shareholders
equity under a revaluation reserve.
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
Standard No. 27 provides, that upon the initial recognition
of property, plant and equipment, the entity shall include in
the cost of the asset all the costs it will be required to incur
in respect of a liability to dismantle and remove the asset and
to restore the site on which it was located.
Standard No. 27 provides that if property, plant and
equipment consists of several components with different
estimated useful lives, the individual significant components
should be depreciated over their individual useful lives.
Standard No. 27 will apply to financial statements for
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2007, and will be
adopted on a retroactive basis, except for asset retirement
obligations for which initial adoption will be in accordance
with the provisions of Standard No. 27.
The initial implementation of the Standard is expected to have
the following effects:
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
Implementation of Standard No. 27 is anticipated to result
in the initial recognition of liabilities to dismantle and
remove assets and to restore the site with respect to the cell
sites, retail stores and general and administrative facilities,
and accordingly there will be an increase in net book value of
the fixed assets and an increase in long-term liabilities due to
the obligation for asset retirement. Also, there will be a
decrease in retained earnings in the amount of approximately NIS
6 million, net of related taxes. The additional cost will
be recognized over the useful life of the asset. The obligation
is recognized at fair value, and the accretion expense will be
recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to
its expected settlement value.
The Company depreciates property, plant and equipment based on
the estimated useful life of the dominant asset within each
group. Upon adoption of Standard No. 27, starting
January 1, 2007, the Company will retroactively separate
individual components of property, plant and equipment with
estimated useful lives that are different from the entire
network, mainly
F-16
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
transmission equipment such as fiber-optic cables and
infrastructure, and calculate depreciation expense based on the
estimated useful life of each component. The retroactive
application of this change is expected to increase the
Companys retained earnings as of January 1, 2007, by
approximately NIS 280 million, and to have the following
effect on the Companys results of operations for all of
the periods reported herein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Decrease in depreciation expense
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Decrease in capital gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax expense
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net income
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in basic and diluted earnings per ordinary shares
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3 Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Israeli currency NIS
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Trade Receivables, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Open accounts and unbilled revenue
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Checks and credit cards receivables
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
Current maturity of long-term receivables
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 5 Other Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Government institutions
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Receivables in respect of debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Handsets
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Accessories
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Spare parts
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Inventories of handsets, accessories and
spare-parts as at September 30, 2006, are presented net of
a provision for decline in value in the amount of NIS
26 million (December 31, 2005 NIS
40 million, December 31, 2004 NIS
20 million).
Note 7 Long-term Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Open accounts(a)
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
Credit cards receivables(a)
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Other
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
Less deferred interest income(b)
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
Less Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Maturity dates are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Second year
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Third year
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Fourth year and thereafter
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The long-term trade receivables arise from the sale of handsets
on a contractual installment basis (primarily 36 monthly
payments). |
|
|
(b) |
The deferred interest income constitutes the difference between
the amount of the long-term receivables and their discounted
value based on the relevant imputed interest rate at the date of
the transaction. The annual interest rate used by the Company in
2006 is 5% (2005 3.5%-7%, 2004 9%). |
Note 8 Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network | |
|
|
|
|
|
Computers, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Control and | |
|
|
|
Furniture | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission | |
|
Testing | |
|
|
|
and Office | |
|
Leasehold | |
|
|
|
|
Land* | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Vehicles | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Improvements | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
For the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
6,830 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
8,861 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
7,234 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
5,907 |
|
Depreciation for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,280 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
6,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for decline in value in land held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Additions
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net depreciated cost as at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net depreciated cost as at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network | |
|
|
|
|
|
Computers, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
Control and | |
|
|
|
Furniture | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission | |
|
Testing | |
|
|
|
and Office | |
|
Leasehold | |
|
|
|
|
Land* | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Vehicles | |
|
Equipment | |
|
Improvements | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
7,234 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
7,391 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
9,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,280 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
6,744 |
|
Depreciation for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,673 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
7,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for decline in value in land held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net depreciated cost as at September 30, 2006
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents land that was leased from the Israel Lands
Administration. |
|
|
|
B. Additional
information |
1. The accumulated cost of the network as at
September 30, 2006 includes direct costs incurred to
construct the cellular mobile telephone system, in the amount of
NIS 239 million (December 31, 2005 NIS
224 million, December 31, 2004 NIS
205 million) including capitalized engineering,
professional consulting fees, direct salaries and financing
expenses.
2. The accumulated cost of the computers as at
September 30, 2006 includes cumulative capitalized
development costs of software for internal use in the amount of
NIS 442 million (December 31, 2005
NIS 397 million , December 31, 2004
NIS 320 million).
3. Depreciation and amortization expenses in respect of
property, plant and equipment totaled NIS 988 million,
NIS 945 million and NIS 912 million for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expenses in respect of property,
plant and equipment totaled NIS 683 million and NIS
642 million for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
4. Regarding liens see Note 17D.
F-20
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 9 Other Assets, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
License
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License amortization expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 totaled
NIS 11 million, NIS 16 million and NIS
29 million, respectively. License amortization expenses for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005, and 2006
totaled NIS 21 million and NIS 25 million,
respectively.
The expected license amortization expense for the next six years
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
2006
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
2007
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
2008
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
2009
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
2010
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
2011
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Note 10 Short-Term Bank Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
September 30 | |
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Interest rate % | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Short-term loans from banks
|
|
|
6.4 - 7.1 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
Current maturities of long-term loans from banks
|
|
|
6.9 - 7.3 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 11 Trade Payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Open accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Israeli currency
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
In foreign currency (mainly in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Accrued expenses (mainly in NIS)
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturity of long-term trade payables
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12 Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Employees and related liabilities
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Government institutions
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Advances from customers
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13 Long-term Loans from Banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
In NIS linked to the Israeli CPI
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In NIS unlinked
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
Less debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate for September 30, 2006
6.4% 7.3% (2005 5.1% 7.3%,
2004 linked to the Israeli CPI 6.59%,
unlinked 5.02% 10.3%).
F-22
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
2006
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
2007
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
2008
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
Credit facility agreement |
In March 2006, the Company entered into an unsecured syndicated
facility agreement with a number of Israeli and international
banks arranged by Citibank N.A. and Citibank International plc,
which provides for a term loan of $280 million and a
revolving credit facility of up to $70 million. The term
loan is repayable in installments ranging from 10% to 25% of the
principal, commencing 24 months after the date of the
agreement and maturing on December 22, 2010. Amounts drawn
under the revolving credit facility are repayable within a
period of one to six months, at the Companys discretion,
and final maturity is December 22, 2010. On April 10,
2006, the Company converted part of the outstanding dollar loan
into a NIS loan. The Company repaid an amount of
$137.5 million (comprised of $110 million on account
of the term loan and $27.5 million on account of the
revolving credit facility) and the Company received in exchange
an amount of NIS 633 million (comprised of a term loan
in the amount of NIS 506 million and a revolving credit
facility in the amount of NIS 127 million). As of
September 30, 2006, the outstanding principal amounts
denominated in U.S. dollars and NIS were as follows:
$170 million and NIS 506.4 ($117.7 million) under the
term loan facility; and $36.1 million and NIS
107.6 million ($25.0 million) under the revolving
credit facility.
Dollar denominated loans under the credit facility bear interest
at an annual rate of
one-to-six-month LIBOR
plus a margin that depends on the Companys ratio of net
debt to EBITDA as of the last financial statement provided prior
to each interest period as follows: 1.35% if the Companys
ratio is equal to or greater than 2.5:1; 1.05% if the ratio is
greater than or equal to 1.5:1 but lower than 2.5:1; or 0.80% if
the ratio is less than 1.5:1. As of September 30, 2006, the
average interest rate on the outstanding dollar loans was
three-month LIBOR + 1.05% per year. The NIS loans bear
interest at an annual rate of one to six month Tel Aviv
Interbank Offered Rate, or TELBOR, plus up to 0.3% and a
variable margin ranging from 0.8% to 1.35%, depending on the
Companys ratio of net debt to EBITDA, as in the dollar
loans described above. As of September 30, 2006, the
average interest rate on the outstanding NIS loans was three
month TELBOR + 1.05% + 0.17% per year.
The EBITDA was defined in the loan agreement as the consolidated
net earnings for the period with the addition of consolidated
financing expenses, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less
any unusual or non-recurring amount and amounts attributed to
the minority interest.
The loan agreement includes standard provisions with respect to
voluntary prepayment, events of default, financial covenants and
restrictive covenants. The events of default include the loss of
control of the Company by IDB or DIC, the revocation of the
Companys license, or any amendment of the Companys
license that would have a material adverse effect on the
Company, any demands under indemnity letters to local planning
and building committees in excess of
F-23
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
$50.0 million in the aggregate (or provision in the
Companys financial statements with respect thereof) and
any material adverse change. The financial covenants require
that the Company maintain a ratio of net debt to EBITDA of not
more than 2.5:1 and a ratio of EBITDA to net interest expense of
at least 5.0:1. The restrictive covenants include, among other
things, limitations on liens, loans, guarantees and indemnities,
the incurrence of indebtedness, acquisitions, dispositions of
assets, mergers and other changes of control. The Companys
credit facility limits its ability to pay dividends, including
by limiting the distribution of dividends in respect of any
financial year so that any distributions based on the retained
earnings accumulated since January 1, 2006, does not exceed
the lesser of (a) 75% of the Companys aggregate net
income from January 1, 2006 to the date of distribution and
(b) the aggregate eligible dividend amount from
January 1, 2006 to the date of distribution, the
eligible dividend amount being the lesser of
(i) the Companys net income for each financial year
and (ii) the excess of free cash flow over 110% of total
debt service for each financial year. In addition, the Company
is also permitted to make additional distributions out of the
expected approximately NIS 280 million ($65.1 million)
adjustment to retained earnings referred to in Note 2U.3
regarding the new accounting standards, Standard No. 27,
not exceeding NIS 310 million. Once the Company has made
the required principal repayment under the facility that is due
on March 9, 2010, the aforesaid limitation may be replaced,
at the Companys option, with a new limitation on dividend
distributions such that any dividend to be distributed for the
period between March 9, 2010 and the final repayment date
may not exceed the difference between (a) the forecasted
cash, cash equivalents and free cash flow (such forecast to be
pre-approved by the lenders) for the period ending on the final
repayment date (not to exceed the Companys free cash flow
for the equivalent period in the previous financial year), and
(b) 110% of total debt service for the period commencing on
the proposed dividend payment date and ending upon final
repayment date. Free cash flow is defined as EBITDA with the
addition or subtraction of changes in working capital, minus
capital expenditures and any amounts paid or payable in respect
of tax. Debt service is defined as the payments on account of
principal and interest of the Companys loans, including
payments in respect of commissions and other expenses. In
addition, the Company is required to enter into foreign exchange
and interest rate hedging agreements pursuant to which at least
66% of any loans outstanding at any time under the credit
facility agreement are hedged. The Company is in compliance with
all of its debt covenants.
Total amount available for drawing under the existing credit
facilities as of December 31, 2005 and September 30,
2006 is NIS 544 million and NIS 411 million,
respectively.
F-24
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 14 Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
Interest Rate % | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Debentures (Series A) linked to the CPI
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Debentures (Series B) linked to the CPI
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
Unamortized premium on debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
Less Deferred issuance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
2009
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
2010
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
Issuance of debentures |
During December 2005, the Company issued NIS
1,037,000,000 par value debentures (Series A) to
institutional investors at par value. The debentures are payable
in nine equal semi-annual installments, on July 5 of each
of the years 2008 through 2012 and on January 5 of each of the
years 2009 through 2012. The interest on the debentures is to be
paid on January 5 of each of the years 2007 through 2012 and on
July 5 of each of the years 2006 through 2012 for the six-month
period ended on the day prior to each date as stated. The
debentures bear annual interest at the rate of 5.0%, linked to
the Israeli CPI with the November 2005 as a basis.
During December 2005, the Company issued NIS
715,102,300 par value debentures (Series B) to
institutional investors at par value. The debentures are payable
in five equal annual installments, on January 5 of each of the
years 2013 through 2017. The interest on the debentures is to be
paid on January 5 of each of the years 2007 through 2017 for the
twelve-month period ended on the day prior to each date as
stated. The debentures bear annual interest at the rate of 5.3%,
linked to the Israeli CPI with the November 2005 index as a
basis.
On May 29, 2006, the Company issued additional
Series A debentures to institutional investors, in the
aggregate amount of NIS 28 million par value, in exchange
for consideration of NIS 29 million, and in the aggregate
amount of NIS 210 million par value Series B
debentures in exchange for consideration of
NIS 221 million.
These debentures (series A and B) were registered for trade
at the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and are not convertible.
F-25
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 15 Liability for Employee Severance
Benefits, net
A. The Companys liability for severance pay
for its Israeli employees is calculated pursuant to Israeli
severance pay law based on the most recent salary of the
employees multiplied by the number of years of employment as of
the balance sheet date. After completing one full year of
employment, the Companys Israeli employees are entitled to
one months salary for each year of employment or a portion
thereof. The Companys liability is fully provided by
monthly deposits with severance pay funds, insurance policies
and by an accrual. For the majority of the Company employees the
payments to the pension funds and insurance companies discharge
the Companys obligation to the employees as required by
the Severance Pay Law in connection with Section 14.
Accumulated amounts in the pension funds and with the insurance
companies are not under the control or administration of the
Company, and accordingly, neither those amounts nor the
corresponding accrual for severance pay are reflected in the
balance sheet. The obligation of the Company, under law and
labor agreements, for termination benefits to employees not
covered by the aforementioned pension or insurance plans is
included in the balance sheet.
B. The severance pay expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 were approximately NIS
26 million, NIS 27 million and NIS 27 million,
respectively. The severance pay expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 were approximately NIS
21 million and NIS 21 million, respectively. The
Company expects to pay NIS 27 million in 2006 in respect of
severance pay.
Note 16 Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
In respect of acquisition of spectrum licenses
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17 Commitments and Contingent
Liabilities
|
|
A. |
Contingent liabilities |
1. In December 2002, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company and another cellular operator in the
District Court of Tel-AvivJaffa in connection with the
Companys incoming call tariff to subscribers of other
operators when calling the Companys subscribers during the
period prior to the regulation of interconnect fees. If the
lawsuit is certified as a class action, the amount claimed is
NIS 1.6 billion (as at the filing date thereof). Based on
advice of counsel management believes that the Company has a
good defense against the certification of the lawsuit as a class
action. Accordingly, no provision has been included in the
financial statements in respect of this claim.
2. In August 2001, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of the Companys subscribers in
connection with air time tariffs and subscriber fees that were
allegedly collected not in accordance with the language of
F-26
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
the agreement of undertaking signed by the Companys
subscribers at the time of their joining the Companys
network. If the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the
amount claimed is NIS 1.26 billion plus punitive damages at
a rate of not less than 100% of the amount of the judgment. In
February 2004, the motion for certification as a class action
was denied. In March 2004, this decision was appealed to the
Israeli Supreme Court. In January 2006, the Supreme Court
approved the plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint to
reflect the amendment to the Consumer Protection Law and return
to the District Court in order to examine the amendments
effect, if any, on the District Court ruling, which remains in
effect. In October 2006, a separate motion was granted allowing
the plaintiff to further revise his complaint, as a result of
enactment of the Class Action Claims Law. Based on advice
of counsel, management believes that the Company has good
arguments against the certification of the lawsuit as a class
action but due to the procedural irregularities demonstrated in
the conduct of this lawsuit, it is difficult to assess, at this
stage, prior to deliberations, the certifications chances
of success. However, based on advice of counsel, the Company
believes the likelihood of certification of the lawsuit as a
class action to be not probable. Accordingly, no provision has
been included in the Companys financial statements in this
respect.
3. In September 2000, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of the Companys subscribers in
connection with VAT charges in respect of warranty premiums and
the provision of warranty services that were allegedly provided
not in accordance with the law. If the lawsuit is certified as a
class action, the amount of the claim is NIS 402 million
(as at the filing date thereof). In February 2006, the motion
for certification as a class action was denied. In March 2006,
an appeal was filed with the Supreme Court challenging the
dismissal. Based on advice of counsel, management believes that
the Company has a good defense against the appeal. Accordingly,
no provision has been included in the Companys financial
statements in respect of this claim.
4. In August 2001, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of the Companys subscribers in
connection with the Company outgoing call tariffs for the
Talkman (pre-paid) plan and the collection of a
distribution fee for Talkman calling cards. If the
claim is certified as a class action, the amount claimed is NIS
135 million (as at the filing date thereof). In June 2004,
the motion for certification as a class action was denied. In
September 2004, this decision was appealed to the Israeli
Supreme Court. Based on advice of counsel, management believes
that the Company has a good defense against the appeal.
Accordingly, no provision has been included in the
Companys financial statements in respect of this claim.
5. In May 2004, the municipalities of Herzliya and Ramat
Hasharon and the local committees of these cities filed a
petition with the High Court of Justice against the Government
of Israel, other public bodies and the cellular companies,
including the Company, in regard to a number of issues relating
to the licensing of cell sites. The remedies requested in the
petition are, among others, annulment of the provision in the
National Zoning Plan (NZP) 36A, which, allegedly,
does not allow the local committees discretion with respect to
the issuance of building permits or, alternatively, a statement
that the local committees have discretion that allows them to
set conditions and/or to refuse to issue building permits; to
declare that the Pharmacists Regulations regarding
radiation are null and void, and to arrange the matter of
radiation standards and supervision over radiation by means of
legislation; to stop the issuance of new building permits under
the NZP until such legislation is concluded and to instruct the
cellular companies to deposit letters of indemnity for claims
under Section 197 of the Planning and Building Law as a
condition for receiving building permits. In July 2004, in a
hearing that was held in the Supreme Court sitting as the High
Court of Justice, temporary remedies were not
F-27
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
granted to the plaintiffs with respect to their claims. In
addition, the High Court of Justice requested that the State
report within a period of three to four months regarding the
progress in the radiation legislation. Upon enactment of a
non-ionizing radiation law, the petitioners agreed to withdraw
their petition. In January 2006, the High Court of Justice
approved cancellation of the claim with no order for expenses.
6. A dispute exists between the Company and the Ministry of
Communications with respect to the payment of fees for its use
of the GSM and UMTS frequencies. The amount in dispute as at
September 30, 2006, is approximately NIS 56 million.
Until a final decision on this matter, the Company has deposited
approximately half of this amount with the Ministry of
Communications. Based on advice of counsel, management believes
that the method the Company applies in the calculation of the
fees is the lawful method. Accordingly, no provision has been
included in the Company financial statements in respect of the
amount in dispute, including the amount the Company has
deposited which is refundable upon the favorable resolution of
the dispute. The Company has applied to the courts regarding
this issue.
7. In April 2003, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against two other cellular operators and the Company with
the District Court of Tel-AvivJaffa in connection with the
Companys incoming SMS tariff to subscribers of other
operators when sending SMS messages to the Companys
subscribers during the period before the regulation of SMS
interconnect fees. If the lawsuit is certified as a class
action, the amount claimed is NIS 90 million (as at the
filing date thereof), without the specification of the amount
claimed from the Company. Based on advice of counsel, management
believes that the Company has a good defense against the
certification of the lawsuit as a class action. Accordingly, no
provision has been included in the Company financial statements
in respect of this claim.
8. In August 2003, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of the Companys subscribers in
connection with the Company method of rounding the rates of
calls, the Company method of linking rates of calls to the
consumer price index and that a certain rate that was approved
by the Ministry of Communications in 1996 was illegally
approved. If the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the
amount claimed is NIS 150 million (as at the filing date
thereof). Following the amendment to the Consumer Protection Law
in December 2005, the plaintiff filed an amended statement of
its claim in March 2006. No hearing has as yet to be held on the
merits of the motion, and based on advice of counsel, management
believes that the Company has a good defense against the
certification of the lawsuit as a class action. Accordingly, no
provision has been included in the Company financial statements
in respect of this claim.
9. In January 2004, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of its subscribers, with respect to
the rates of calls made from the cellular voice mail using the
Boomering service through use of one of the
marketing programs the Company offered to its subscribers. If
the claim is recognized as a class action, the amount claimed is
NIS 10 million (as at the filing date thereof). In the
opinion of management, based on advice of counsel, the Company
has good defense arguments against the certification of the
claim as a class action. Accordingly, no provision has been
included in the Company financial statements in respect of this
claim.
10. In March 2005, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of its subscribers in respect of
damages in the amount of NIS 10 million (as at the filing
date thereof), alleging that the Companys marketing
campaigns are misleading. In the opinion of management, based on
advice of counsel, at this stage, prior to commencement of the
hearing on the substance of the request, the Company has a good
F-28
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
defense argument against the certification of the lawsuit as a
class action. Accordingly, no provision has been included in the
Company financial statements in respect of this claim.
11. In April 2005, a lawsuit was filed against the Company
in the District Court of Tel-AvivJaffa by one of the
Companys former dealers and importers for the amount of
NIS 28 million (reduced for court fee purposes from
approximately NIS 38 million), alleging that the Company
breached an agreement between the parties. Based on advice of
counsel, management believes that the Company has a good defense
against the certification of the lawsuit as class action.
Accordingly, no provision has been made in the Company financial
statements in respect of this claim.
12. In October 2005, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by one of its subscribers in respect of
damages in the amount of NIS 10 million (as at the filing
date thereof), alleging the Company has mislead in regard to
refunds, with respect to the use of air-time in various
marketing plans. After a preliminary factual examination, based
on advice of counsel, management is of the opinion, that the
Company has a good defense against the certification of the
claim as a class action. Therefore, no provision has been
included in the Company financial statements in respect of this
claim.
13. The Company has undertaken to indemnify the
Companys directors and officers, as well as certain other
employees for certain events listed in the indemnifications
letters given to them. The aggregate amount payable to all
directors and officers and other employees who may have been or
will be given identical indemnification letters is limited to
the amounts the Company receives from the Companys
insurance policy plus 30% of the Companys
shareholders equity as of December 31, 2001, or
NIS 486 million, and to be adjusted by the Israeli CPI.
14. In August 2006, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed against the Company and two other cellular operators in
the District Court of Tel-AvivJaffa by one of the
Companys subscribers in connection with sums allegedly
unlawfully charged for a segment of a call that was not actually
carried out. If the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the
total amount claimed is estimated by the plaintiffs as exceeding
NIS 100 million, without specifying the amount claimed
from the Company specifically. At this preliminary stage, and
due to the circumstances in Note 17A(17) herein below,
management is unable to assess the lawsuits chances of
success. Accordingly, no provision has been included in the
Companys financial statements in respect of this claim.
15. Various local-planning and building authorities have
contested the legality of the construction and operation of a
number of the Companys cell sites for lack of building
permits. The Company is in the process of obtaining building
permits for some of them or of modifying them to satisfy
applicable exemptions. Other cell sites operate in reliance on
an exemption from the requirements to obtain a building permit.
Local planning and building authorities have unsuccessfully
challenged the Companys reliance thereon and otherwise
claimed that these cell sites do not meet other legal
requirements. In cases where building permits will not be
received or exemptions are not to be relied upon, the Company
may be forced to relocate, reduce coverage capacity or dismantle
these cell sites. In those circumstances the Companys
results of operations may be adversely affected.
16. In November 2006, subsequent to the balance sheet date,
a purported class action lawsuit was filed against the Company,
a third party that had provided services to customers of the
Company (the Supplier) and other parties allegedly
related to the supplier, in the District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by a subscriber of the Company. The lawsuit
is in connection with sums allegedly charged by the Company in
respect of content services of the Supplier without the
F-29
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
subscribers consent. If the lawsuit is certified as a
class action, the total amount claimed from the Company, the
Supplier and other parties is estimated by the plaintiffs as
approximately NIS 18 million, in addition to another NIS
10 million for mental anguish. At this preliminary stage,
management is unable to assess the lawsuits chances of
success. Accordingly, no provision has been included in the
Companys financial statements in respect of this claim.
17. In November 2006, subsequent to the balance sheet date,
a purported class action lawsuit was filed against the Company,
two other cellular operators and two landline operators in the
District Court of
Tel-AvivJaffa by
four plaintiffs claiming to be subscribers of the three cellular
operators, in connection with sums allegedly unlawfully charged
for a segment of a call that was not actually carried out. If
the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the total amount
claimed from the Company, as well as from the each of the other
cellular operators is estimated by the plaintiffs as
approximately NIS 53 million each (the amount claimed from
all five operators is estimated by the plaintiffs as
approximately NIS 159 million). In November 2006, the
Company has filed a motion to transfer this lawsuit to that
judge handling the lawsuit filed in August 2006 and mentioned
above and for further instructions by such court, of the way the
two purported class actions should be heard, on the basis of the
similarity of the two lawsuits. At this preliminary stage and
given the circumstances just described, management is unable to
assess the lawsuits chances of success. Accordingly, no
provision has been included in the Companys financial
statements in respect of this claim.
18. In January 2007, subsequent to the balance sheet date,
a lawsuit was filed against the Company in an arbitration
proceeding for the amount of approximately NIS 35 million
by a company (the Plaintiff) that purchased cellular
services from the Company in order to sell the services to its
customers, alleging, among other things, that the Company has
breached agreements between the parties and making claims
concerning the Companys conduct. The Company rejects all
claims made by the Plaintiff against the Company. However, at
this preliminary stage, management is unable to assess the
lawsuits chances of success. Accordingly, no provision has
been made in the financial statements in respect of this claim.
19. In January 2007, subsequent to the balance sheet date,
a purported class action lawsuit was filed against the Company,
two other cellular operators and two landline operators in the
District Court of Jerusalem by three plaintiffs claiming to be
subscribers of some of the defendants, in connection with an
alleged violation of the defendants statutory duty to
allow their subscribers to transfer with their number to another
operator, thus, allegedly causing monetary damage to the
subscribers. If the lawsuit is certified as a class action, the
total amount claimed is estimated by the plaintiffs to be at
least NIS 10.6 billion, without specifying the amount
claimed from the Company and subject to increase in as much as
the alleged violation is prolonged. The amount of damages
alleged by the plaintiffs is at least NIS 1,000 per
subscriber (the plaintiffs are alleging that the damage for
business customers is at least double the amount and are
maintaining the right to increase the claim accordingly), and
the Company has been attributed 2.82 million subscribers in
the claim. At this preliminary stage, management is unable to
assess the lawsuits chances of success. Accordingly, no
provision has been made in the Companys financial
statements in respect of this claim. However, management
believes that the claim does not provide a relevant basis for
the amount of monetary damages requested.
F-30
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
B. |
Effects of new legislation and standards |
1. a. The National Planning Council, during its
deliberations, has considered amending National Zoning Plan 36
which could, if adopted, make the process of obtaining building
permits for the construction and operation of cell sites more
cumbersome and costly and may delay the deployment of the
Companys network.
In January 2006, the Planning and Building Law was amended by
the Non-ionizing Radiation Law, to provide that as a condition
for issuing a building permit for a cell site, the local
Planning and Building committees must require letters of
indemnification from the cellular companies, for possible
depreciation claims under Section 197 of the Planning and
Building Law, in accordance with the directives of the National
Planning Council. National Planning Council guidelines issued in
January 2006 have provided for a 100% indemnification
undertaking by the cellular companies to the Planning and
Building committees, in the form published by the council and
allowing the indemnifying party to control the defense of the
claim. These guidelines shall remain in effect until they are
replaced with an amendment to the National Zoning Plan
(NZP) 36. In addition, should the Planning and Building law
be construed or amended to allow a longer period of limitation
for depreciation claims than the current period of three years
from approval of the building plan, our potential exposure to
depreciation claims would increase.
Most of the provisions of the Non-ionizing Radiation Law will
enter into effect at the beginning of 2007. The draft
Non-Ionizing Radiation Regulations published by the Ministry of
Environment in November 2006 proposes additional restrictions in
relation to the operation of cell sites and other facilities. If
these restrictions are adopted, they will, among other things,
limit our ability to construct new sites and renew operating
permits for a number of our existing sites, specifically in
residential areas.
To date, the Company has given over thirty-five indemnification
letters in order to receive building permits and three
undertakings to provide indemnification letters. In some of
these instances, the Company has not yet constructed the cell
sites. The Company expects that it will be required to continue
to provide indemnification letters as the process of deploying
the Company cell sites progresses.
The Company estimates that the changes referred to above may
have the following impacts:
|
|
|
(a) The Company estimates, based on the opinion of the
Company legal advisors, that there are currently no legal
grounds for approval of any indemnification with respect to
sites established based on a permit issued under the NZP, prior
to the entry of the aforementioned amendment. Presently,
attempts, which have yet to be filed or decided, are being made
to assert such grounds for legal claims. |
|
|
(b) As part of the Company considerations for establishment
of new cell sites, the Company will also examine the potential
for a claim under Section 197. To the best of
managements knowledge, at this point no court decision has
been made indicating a decline in the value of property due to
the construction of a cell site. |
|
|
(c) The need to dismantle and remove existing sites, and
the difficulties in establishing alternative sites, could have
an adverse effect on the Companys results of operations. |
|
|
(d) The Company is unable to estimate the future impact of
the indemnification requirement, as detailed in sections a and
b. Despite this, if the Company shall be required to make
substantial payments under the indemnity letters, it may have an
adverse effect on the Companys financial results and
trigger a default under the credit facility agreement (see
Note 13C above). |
F-31
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
2. On December 5, 2004, certain changes to the
Communications Regulations (Telecommunications and Broadcasting)
(Payments for Interconnecting), 2000, provided for the following:
|
|
|
a. A gradual decline in the rate of interconnection tariffs
received from other cellular networks or from landline network
operators, as follows: as of March 1, 2005, the rate of NIS
0.45 per minute will decrease to a maximum rate of NIS
0.32 per minute; as of March 1, 2006, to a maximum
rate of NIS 0.29 per minute; as of March 1, 2007,
to a maximum rate of NIS 0.26 per minute, and as of
March 1, 2008, to a maximum rate of NIS 0.22 per
minute. |
|
|
b. A decrease in the rate of interconnection tariffs
received from international network operators, from the current
rate of NIS 0.25 per minute, to a maximum rate of NIS
0.22 per minute, as of March 1, 2008. |
|
|
c. A decrease, as of March 1, 2005, in the rate of SMS
interconnection tariffs received from other cellular operators
from the rate of NIS 0.285 per message, to a maximum rate
of NIS 0.05 per message, and an additional decrease to a
maximum rate of NIS 0.025 per message as of March 1,
2006. |
|
|
d. The aforementioned tariffs in items a through c do not
include Value Added Tax and linkage to the CPI, and they will be
annually updated, based on the annual change in the CPI, as of
March 1, 2005, in accordance with the provisions of the
aforementioned regulations. |
In addition, on December 16, 2004, the Companys
license was amended and therefore, commencing December 31,
2008, the basic airtime charging unit, including for
interconnect purposes, will decrease from the current intervals
of 12-second units to intervals of 1-second units. Under the
Companys license, the Company is also permitted to offer
the subscriber calling plans using alternative airtime charging
units. This change in the calculation method of call units may
result in a decrease in the Companys future revenues and
therefore the Company is taking various measures in order to
reduce the impact of the decisions of the Ministry of
Communications.
In November 2006, subsequent to balance sheet date, the
Companys license and licenses of other cellular operators
were amended in respect to the pricing method of calls that
ultimately end in voice mail of cellular subscribers. The
amendment will come into effect in January 2007. Management
expects that this amendment will decrease the Companys
annual revenue and net income.
The Ministry of Communications is also examining the possibility
of limiting the Companys ability to offer subscribers
calling plans linking airtime rebates with the purchase of
handsets. If such restrictions are imposed, this may impair the
Companys ability to offer advanced handsets that include
value-added features and services to the Companys
subscribers at subsidized prices or in conjunction with
attractive calling plans, which may result in lower revenues
from value-added services and selling handsets.
3. In March 2005, an amendment to the Communications Law
was approved requiring the Minister of Communications to publish
a number portability plan for landline and cellular telephone
operators. Number portability would permit subscribers to change
operators without having to change their telephone numbers. The
Minister was required to provide instructions for license
holders for the implementation and operation of the plan by
September 1, 2006. For special reasons, the implementation
and operation of the plan may be postponed for a period not to
exceed three months.
In August 2005, the Ministry of Communications published
guidelines for number portability. Since May 2005, the
telecommunications license holders have repeatedly informed the
Ministry of
F-32
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Communications, through a joint forum for number portability
that they were not prepared to implement the guidelines on
schedule. The Ministry of Communications has refused take
measures in order to change the date for implementation of the
guidelines.
In August 2006, the Company, together with Partner and
Pelephone, filed a petition with the Supreme Court, sitting as
the High Court of Justice, for the provision of an order against
the Government of Israel and the Minister of Communications to
show cause for their failure to immediately act in order to
initiate an amendment to the Communications Law postponing the
deadline for the implementation of number portability, since the
deadline is set forth in the Communications Law. Bezeq filed a
similar petition on the same date. The reason for the petition
include the Companys inability to comply with the
guidelines under the current time schedule since the number
portability time schedule was based on number portability plans
implemented abroad and failed to take into consideration the
unique technological environment of the Israeli cellular market,
the more complex requirements set by the Israeli regulator and
the absence of a detailed plan, as was originally contemplated
by the law. As a result, all relevant telecommunications license
holders, including the Company, may face claims of violation of
the Communications Law and of their general license as of
September 1, 2006, without the ability to comply with the
law and may incur penalties.
At this stage, the Company cannot assess the effects of the
aforesaid on its business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In January 2007, the Company notified the Ministry of
Communications that it concluded the internal developments
required for the implementation of number portability. The
Company believes that the number portability plan will be
implemented during the second half of 2007, subject to the
readiness of the other communications operators.
Individual subscribers have sought to intervene in the petition
and filed a purported class action against the Company and other
cellular and landline operators based on the alleged failure to
comply with these requirements. For details see Note 17A.19.
4. On August 31, 2006, the Royalties Regulations were
amended, see C(1)(b) below.
1. The Company has commitments regarding the license it was
granted in 1994:
|
|
|
a. Not to pledge any of the assets used to execute the
license without the advance consent of the Ministry of
Communications. |
|
|
b. To pay the State of Israel royalties equal to 3% of the
Companys revenues generated from telecommunications
services, less payments transferred to other license holders for
interconnect fees or roaming services, sale of handsets and
losses from bad debt. The rate of these royalties has decreased
in recent years, from 4.5% in 2002, to 4% in 2003, and to 3.5%
in 2004 and 2005. In August 2006, the royalty rate was reduced
to 3%, retroactively from January 1, 2006 and it will
continue to be reduced by 0.5% per year, until reaching a
rate of 1%. |
|
|
c. The Companys shareholders joint equity,
combined with the Companys equity, shall not amount to
less than $200 million. Regarding this stipulation, a
shareholder holding less than 10% of the rights to the
Companys equity is not taken into account. |
The Company is in compliance with the above conditions.
F-33
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
2. The Company entered into an agreement with Nokia Israel
Communications Ltd., or Nokia Israel, in July 2001 for the
purchase of the Companys GSM/ GPRS system. The Company was
also granted an option to purchase GSM 800, EDGE, UMTS and
ancillary systems. In 2002, the Company exercised its option to
purchase an EDGE system, and in 2005, the Company purchased a
UMTS core system, under similar terms. The Company is obligated
to purchase maintenance services from Nokia Israel for five
years from the final acceptance of the GPRS system (until 2007).
Thereafter, Nokia Israel is obligated to offer the Company
maintenance services for 15 years from final acceptance
(until 2017). Under the agreement, the parties generally have
limited liability for direct damages of up to 10% of the value
of the agreement.
3. In September 2005, the Company signed an agreement with
Ericsson Israel Ltd. according to which the Company will acquire
a UMTS radio access network and ancillary products and services.
The Company is obligated to purchase maintenance services for
5 years from the launch of the system (until 2011) and the
Company has an option to purchase additional maintenance
services for 20 years from the launch of the Systems (until
2026), including all the required services for establishment and
maintenance of the system (including receipt of updates and
upgrades for the system). The Company agreed to
purchase 60% of cell sites the Company purchases by
September 2010 from Ericsson. The aggregate scope of the
agreement is $27.5 million payable over the upcoming five
years. Under the agreement the parties generally have limited
liability for direct damages of up to 10% of the value of the
agreement.
4. Beeri Printers provides the Companys
printing supplies and invoices as well as the distribution,
packaging and delivery of invoices and other mail to the postal
service distribution centers. The Company entered into an
agreement with Beeri Printers Limited
Partnership and with Beeri Technologies (1977) Ltd.,
or together Beeri, for printing services in August 2003.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company committed to
purchase from Beeri a minimum monthly quantity of
production and distribution services which may be reduced if the
Company modifies its printed invoice delivery policy. The
agreement is valid until 2008.
5. The Company have committed to its shareholders that upon
a registration of the Companys securities, the Company
will be required to pay all expenses incurred in carrying out
the above registrations, as well as the reasonable fees and
expenses of one legal counsel for the selling registration
rights holders, except for underwriter discounts and commissions
with respect to the shares of such holders.
6. As at September 30, 2006, the Company has
commitments to purchase equipment for the communications
network and cellular telephone equipment, at an amount estimated
at NIS 153 million.
7. Major operating lease and service agreements:
|
|
|
a. Office buildings and warehouses there are
lease agreements for periods of up to 23 years and four
months. |
|
|
b. Switching stations there are lease
agreements for switching station locations for periods of up to
10 years. |
|
|
c. Cell sites there are lease agreements for
cell sites for periods of up to 28 years and four months. |
|
|
d. Service centers, retail stores and stands
there are lease agreements for service and installation centers,
stores and stands for periods of up to 15 years and six
months. |
|
|
e. Transmission services for cell sites and switches. |
F-34
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
f. Motor vehicles lease for a period of 3 years. |
The anticipated annual lease payments under non-cancelable
operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
2006
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
2007
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
2008
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
2009
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
2010
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of issuance of the debentures (see Note 14), the
Company committed not to create liens on its assets so long as
the debentures have not been fully repaid, except for a fixed
lien on assets for purposes of securing credit that will permit
acquisition of those assets. The credit facility agreement (see
Note 13.C.) includes, as well, some limitations on the
Company with regard to creating liens on its assets.
The Company has given bank guarantees as follows:
|
|
|
a. To the Government of Israel (to guarantee performance of
the License) U.S. $10 million. |
|
|
b. To the Government of Israel (to guarantee performance of
the License for Cellcom Fixed Line Communication L.
P.) NIS 10 million. |
|
|
c. To suppliers and government institutions NIS
14.7 million. |
Note 18 Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
and at December 31 2005 | |
|
|
and 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Issued and | |
|
|
Authorized | |
|
Paid-up | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS | |
|
NIS | |
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.1 par value each
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. On January 5, 2006, March 13, 2006,
May 30, 2006 and September 28, 2006, the Company
distributed to its shareholders a cash dividend in the amount of
NIS 1.7 billion, NIS 1.7 billion,
NIS 330 million and NIS 100 million, respectively.
B. The earnings per share and the number of shares
used in the calculation of earnings per share have been
retroactively adjusted to reflect the increase in the authorized
share capital, stock split and allotments of bonus shares
discussed below in accordance with Israeli Standard No. 22.
F-35
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
On October 12, 2006, subsequent to the balance sheet date,
the shareholders meeting of the Company resolved the
following decisions regarding capital transactions:
|
|
|
1) To reorganize the share capital so that each ordinary
share of NIS 0.1 par value would be split into 10 ordinary
shares of NIS 0.01 par value. |
|
|
2) To increase the authorized share capital from
100,000,000 ordinary shares of NIS 0.01 par value to
300,000,000 ordinary shares of NIS 0.01 par value. |
|
|
3) To allot 96,360,000 fully paid share dividend of NIS
0.01 par value to all shareholders, pro rata. |
Following consummation of the above transactions, the Company
has 97,500,000 issued and fully paid ordinary shares issued and
outstanding.
|
|
C. |
Share Based Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
All per share data and ordinary share data below have been
retroactively adjusted to reflect the increase in the authorized
share capital, stock split and allotment of bonus shares,
effected by the Company, subsequent to the balance sheet date,
on October 12, 2006. |
|
|
In September 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a share based incentive plan for employees, directors,
consultants and sub-contractors and to those of the
Companys affiliates and the shareholders affiliates.
The plan has an initial pool of 2,500,000 shares over which
options and restricted stock units may be granted. |
|
|
In October and November 2006, subsequent to the balance sheet
date, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of
2,414,143 ordinary shares at an exercise price of
$12.60 per share. Among those grants were options to
purchase up to 450,000 ordinary shares granted to the Chairman
of the Companys Board of Directors and an additional
450,000 options to the Companys Chief Executive Officer.
The remainder of the option grants was made to other Company
employees. The options are exercisable only upon a successful
public offering of the Companys ordinary shares. |
|
|
In general, the options will vest in four equal installments on
each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the
date of grant. As a result, the total value of the options
granted in October and November 2006 will be expensed over the
vesting period commencing on the date of completion of a public
offering of the Companys ordinary shares. However, the
vesting of options and restricted stock units will be
accelerated upon the occurrence of certain events, including a
merger, a consolidation, a sale of all or substantially all of
the Companys consolidated assets, or a sale of the
Companys ordinary shares held by DIC and its affiliates to
a third party resulting in IDB holding less than 50.01% of the
Companys then outstanding share capital. |
|
|
The total compensation expense related to the options granted
during October-November 2006 is approximately NIS
53 million, which will be recognized over the vesting
period commencing on the date of completion of a public offering
of the Companys ordinary shares (unaudited). |
F-36
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date
of the grant using the Black-Scholes model, assuming a dividend
yield of zero percent, due to a dividend adjustment mechanism,
and using the following assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average expected life of the options of 4.25 years; |
|
|
|
risk-free, annual interest rate of 5.01%, which represents the
risk- free interest rate of zero-coupon U.S. Government
Bonds; and |
|
|
|
expected average volatility of 26.69%, which represents a
weighted average standard deviation rate for the stock prices of
similar publicly traded companies. |
The Companys board of directors adopted a dividend policy
to distribute each year at least 75% of its annual net income
determined under Israeli GAAP, subject to applicable law, the
Companys license and the Companys contractual
obligations and provided that such distribution would not be
detrimental to the Companys cash needs or to any plans
approved by the Companys Board of Directors. The
Companys Board will consider, among other factors, the
Companys expected results of operations, including changes
in pricing and competition, planned capital expenditure for
technological upgrades and changes in debt service needs
including due to changes in interest rates or currency exchange
rates in order to conclude reasonably that a distribution of
dividends will not prevent the Company from satisfying the
Companys existing and foreseeable obligations as they
become due. In addition, there is an agreement among the
controlling shareholders of IDB, the Companys ultimate
parent company, to target a dividend distribution of at least
50% of its distributable gains each year. Dividend payments are
not guaranteed and the Companys Board of Directors may
decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any
reason, not to pay dividends.
As to limitations regarding the Companys ability to pay
dividends imposed by its credit facility, see Note 13C. In
addition, Israeli law provides that dividends may only be paid
out of cumulative retained earnings or out of retained earnings
over the prior two years, provided that there is no reasonable
concern that the payment of the dividend will prevent the
Company from satisfying its existing and foreseeable obligations
as they become due, and the Companys license requires that
the Company and its 10% or more shareholders maintain at least
$200 million of combined shareholders equity.
DICs shareholders equity was NIS 4.859 billion
($1.13 billion) at September 30, 2006 (unaudited).
Note 19 Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Revenues from handsets, net
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
Revenues from services
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
4,954 |
|
|
|
4,549 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Additional information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from handsets on an installments basis
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 20 Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
According to source of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues from handsets
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
Cost of revenues from services
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to its components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of handsets
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Changes in inventory
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Write-down of inventory
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
Rent and related expenses
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Salaries and related expenses
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Fees to other operators and others
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Royalties (see Note 17C1)
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Other
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 21 Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Salaries and related expenses
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Commissions
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Advertising and public relations
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 22 General and Administrative
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Salaries and related expenses
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Rent and maintenance
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Other
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts (including
non-current portion):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Balance at beginning of the period
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Additional allowance
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 23 Financial Income (Expenses), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Expenses for long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
Long-term loans
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
Short-term loans
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Transactions in derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Transactions involving installment sales imputed interest on
market installment sales
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other items
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includes expenses for foreign exchange differences
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 24 Other Income (Expenses), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Capital gain (loss) from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other income (expenses), net*
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Includes provision for decline in value of
land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
held for sale
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 25 Income Tax
A. The Company is assessed for tax purposes on the
basis of unconsolidated tax returns. The tax is computed on the
basis of the Companys results in Israeli currency as
determined for statutory purposes.
F-40
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
B. The Company is assessed for tax purposes
according to the Income Tax Law (Adjustments for Inflation),
1985 (hereinafter the Law), the purpose of which is
to measure the results for tax purposes on a real basis and to
prevent taxation of inflationary profits. The adjustment of
nominal profit for tax purposes is not necessarily the same as
the adjustment according to opinions of the Israeli Accounting
Standards Board and, as a result, differences occur between the
income reported in the financial statements and the adjusted
income for tax purposes.
C. On June 29, 2004, the Knesset passed the Law
for the Amendment of the Income Tax Ordinance (Amendment
No. 140 and Temporary Order), 2004 (Amendment
140). The Amendment provides for a gradual reduction in
the Corporate tax rate from 36% to 30% in the following manner:
in 2004 the tax rate will be 35%, in 2005 the tax rate will be
34%, in 2006 the tax rate will be 32% and from 2007 onward the
tax rate will be 30%. The current taxes and the deferred taxes
balances as at June 30, 2004 were calculated in accordance
with the new tax rates specified in Amendment 140, as stated.
The impact of the change on the financial statements as at the
beginning of 2004 is a decrease in the income tax expense in the
amount of NIS 22.3 million.
On July 25, 2005, the Knesset passed the Law for Amendment
of the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 147 and Temporary Order)
(Amendment 147), which provides for an additional
gradual reduction of the Corporate tax rates in the following
manner: in 2006 the tax rate will be 31%, in 2007 the tax rate
will be 29%, in 2008 the tax rate will be 27% and from 2009 the
tax rate will be 26% and from 2010 onward the tax rate will be
25%. In addition, commencing from 2010, upon reduction of the
Companies Tax rate to 25%, every real capital gain will be
subject to tax at the rate of 25%. The current taxes and the
deferred taxes balances as at September 30, 2005 were
calculated in accordance with the new tax rates specified in
Amendment 147, as stated. The impact of the change on the
financial statements as at the beginning of 2005 is a decrease
in the income tax expense in the amount of NIS 15.7 million.
|
|
D. |
Reconciliation of income tax expense: |
A reconciliation of the theoretical tax expense computed on
earnings before taxes at the statutory tax rate and the actual
income tax provision is presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Income before income taxes as per the income statement
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax calculated according to the main tax rate
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible interest expenses (see Note 25F)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Other non-deductible expenses and non taxable income, net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
F-41
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Taxes in respect of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Change in deferred tax balances due to reduction in tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Provisions for employee benefits, net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Allowance for doubtful debts
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Hedging transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Property, plant and equipment and other assets
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred taxes are included in the balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Other receivables (short-term)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Deferred taxes (long-term)
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred taxes are calculated based on the tax rates
expected to apply on the reversal date as indicated above.
|
|
F. |
Income tax in the income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Current taxes
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Prior year taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All income before taxes and income tax expenses for all of the
reporting periods are local in Israel.
F-42
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company recorded a provision for taxes in the amount of NIS
39 million, following a ruling made by the Supreme Court in
Israel, on November 20, 2006, which overturned the previous
ruling made by the District Court regarding the recognition of
financing expenses. The tax provision is an estimate of the
additional tax expense relating to the possibility that the
financing expenses accrued in the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 in respect of financial debt, which
might be attributed by the Israeli tax authorities to the
financing of a dividend that was distributed in this period,
will not be recognized as a deductible expense for tax purposes.
Management believes it has reasons justifying the recognition of
these expenses for tax purposes, or part of them, however since
as of the date of the financial statements the level of
certainty required in order to recognize these expenses do not
exist, the aforementioned provision was recorded. The Company is
evaluating the possible effects of the ruling, if any, on its
future results.
|
|
G. |
Taxes recorded to shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Deferred taxes in respect of hedging transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. |
Losses for tax purposes |
A subsidiary has a tax loss carry forward in the amount of NIS
8.2 million. The balances of the losses carried forward to
the succeeding year are linked to the CPI. No deferred tax asset
has been recorded in respect of these losses and deductions
since utilization thereof is not anticipated.
The Company has final tax assessments up to and including the
2005 tax year. The subsidiaries have not been assessed for tax
purposes since their incorporation.
Note 26 Financial Instruments and Risk
Management
|
|
A. |
Linkage terms of financial instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
In or | |
|
|
|
In or | |
|
|
|
|
Linked to | |
|
|
|
Linked to | |
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
|
|
Currencies | |
|
|
|
Currencies | |
|
Linked to | |
|
|
|
|
(Mainly | |
|
Linked to the | |
|
|
|
(Mainly | |
|
the Israeli | |
|
|
|
|
Dollars) | |
|
Israeli CPI | |
|
Unlinked | |
|
Dollars) | |
|
CPI | |
|
Unlinked | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Assets
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,577 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
As part of its current activities, the Company is exposed to a
variety of market risks, the main risks being exposure to
changes in the exchange rate of the NIS to the dollar, changes
in interest rates and inflationary risks. These risks and
exposures are managed by the Company on
F-43
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
a current basis with the aim of minimizing the impact of the
fluctuations of the market factors on the results of its
operations.
The Company executes transactions in derivative financial
instruments for purposes of hedging its business results and
cash flows. The Company enters into hedging transactions with
banking institutions, including forward transactions and options
in order to reduce the exposure stemming from supplier balances,
long-term loans and commitments to purchase inventory and
equipment.
The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. The Company hedges future
inventory purchases by specific hedging transactions and,
accordingly, it defers the results of these transactions by
recording them in a capital reserve that is reversed to the
statement of income when the specific hedged inventory is issued
to its customers. In the same manner, the Company hedges future
property, plant and equipment purchases by specific hedging
transactions, and accordingly defers the results of these
transactions by recording them in a capital reserve that is
reversed to the statement of income in correspondence with the
depreciation of the specified property, plant and equipment. In
addition, the Company has transactions that do not meet the
criteria determined for classification thereof as hedging
transactions in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and, therefore, the results of these transactions are
recorded in the financing category on the statement
of income on a current basis.
Set forth below is the composition of the derivative financial
instruments at the following dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Par Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Forward contracts on exchange rate (mainly dollar
NIS)
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Forward contracts on Israeli CPI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Options on the exchange rate (mainly dollar NIS)
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Compounded foreign currency and interest swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedging instrument activity recorded within the
shareholders equity in the capital reserve, net of tax,
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Beginning accumulated derivative in capital reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Net (gain) loss reclassified to earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Net change in the revaluation of hedging transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending accumulated derivative in capital reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
The total unrealized fair value gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
recorded within the shareholders equity in the capital
reserve and totaling NIS 18 million, net of tax NIS
13 million, is expected to be reclassified to earnings
during the next 12 months (until September 30, 2007)
due to settlement of the related contracts.
|
|
C. |
Fair value of financial instruments |
The estimated fair values of financial instruments with a
carrying value materially different from their fair value, based
on quoted market prices or rates for the same or similar
instruments, and the related carrying amounts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
September 30, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Book Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Book Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans, debentures and other liabilities
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 27 Related and Interested Parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Current assets
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liability debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Transactions with related and interested parties are
executed in the ordinary course of business at regular
commercial terms: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and related expenses to related parties (two salaried
employees in 2005)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Professional services and other
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2005,
includes benefits and grants in respect of retirement in the
total amount of NIS 11 million, the year ended
December 31, 2005 also includes a signing bonus in the
total amount of NIS 3 million.
In the ordinary course of business, from time to time, the
Company purchases, leases, sells and cooperates in the sale of
goods and services or otherwise engages in transactions with
entities that are members of the IDB group or other interested
or related parties.
The Company has examined said transactions and believes them to
be on commercial terms comparable to those that the Company
could obtain from unaffiliated parties.
F-45
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
In October 2006, subsequent to balance sheet date, the Company
entered into an agreement with DIC pursuant to which DIC
provides the Company with services in the areas of management,
finance, business and accountancy in consideration of NIS
2 million per year. This agreement is for a term of one
year and is automatically renewed for one-year terms unless
either party provides 60 days prior notice to the
contrary.
|
|
Note 28 |
Material Differences between Israeli and US GAAP and their
Effect on the Financial Statements |
|
|
A. |
The effect of the differences between Israeli and US GAAP
on the financial statements |
As discussed in Note 2, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements were prepared in accordance with Israeli
generally accepted accounting principles (Israeli
GAAP), which differ in certain significant respects from
those generally accepted in the United States of America
(US GAAP). Information related to the nature and
effect of such differences is presented below.
a. Israeli GAAP net income to net income according to US
GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Net income as reported, according to Israeli GAAP
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary differences resulting from recognition of revenue
arising from application of EITF 00-21
Note 28C(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Note 28C(3)
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Embedded Derivatives Note 28C(4)
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
AROs Note 28C(6)
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Push down accounting adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expenses of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
Amortization expenses of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
Interest expenses on push down debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
F-46
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Income tax effect of US GAAP adjustments
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income according to US GAAP
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Israeli GAAP shareholders equity to
shareholders equity according to US GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Shareholders equity as reported, according to Israeli GAAP
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Temporary differences resulting from recognition of revenue
arising from application of EITF 00-21
Note 28C(5)
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Note 28C(3)
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Embedded Derivatives Note 28C(4)
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
AROs Note 28C(6)
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Push down accounting adjustments Note 28C(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Push down of the acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
Push down of DICs debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Cumulative depreciation of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Cumulative amortization expenses of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Accrued interest expenses, net of deemed dividend in respect of
DICs push down debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax effect of US GAAP adjustments
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity according to US GAAP
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
Note 28 |
Material Differences between Israeli and US GAAP and their
Effect on the Financial Statements |
|
|
B. |
Condensed financial statements according to US GAAP |
1. Condensed
consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(All amounts are in NIS millions) | |
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
|
3,352 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
|
11,100 |
|
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term bank credit (see Note 28C(2))
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans from banks
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
|
11,100 |
|
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
2. Condensed
consolidated income statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
January 1 | |
|
|
September 22 | |
|
Nine Month Period | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
Through | |
|
|
through | |
|
Ended September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
September 21 | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are in NIS millions except for share and per share data | |
Revenues
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
|
4,195 |
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
751 |
|
Financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
606 |
|
Income tax
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
(Note 28C(6))
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share in NIS
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares used in calculation of basic
and diluted earnings per share (in thousands)
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The period from September 22, 2005 through
September 30, 2005 is presented under the new basis of
accounting within the nine month period ended September 30,
2005. |
F-49
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
3. Changes
in shareholders equity
All ordinary share and per share data have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the increase in the authorized share
capital, stock split and allotments of bonus shares effected by
the Company, subsequent to the balance sheet date on
October 12, 2006 (see Note 18B).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS 0.01 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pare Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are in NIS millions except for share and per share | |
|
|
data | |
Balance as of January 1, 2003
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
Changes in the year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
Changes in the year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
Changes in the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in capital reserve in respect of hedging transactions,
net, for the period from January 1, 2005 through
September 21, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Net income for the period from January 1, 2005 through
September 21, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Elimination of historical equity on acquisition at
September 21, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
(3,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Push-down of the acquisition Note 28C(2b5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Push-down of DICs debt Note 28C(2b6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,970 |
) |
Net income for the period from September 22, 2005 through
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,451 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in capital reserve in respect of hedging transactions,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Dividend paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,570 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(3,830 |
) |
Allotment to dividend share subsequent to balance sheet date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
F-50
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Paid-in | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS 0.01 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pare Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are in NIS millions except for share and per share | |
|
|
data | |
Repayment of DICs push-down debt and interest, net of
deemed dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
97,500,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Comprehensive income (loss) |
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of the change, during the
current period, in the Companys shareholders equity
that does not derive from shareholders investments or from
the distribution of earnings to shareholders.
Comprehensive income (loss) includes two components
net income and other comprehensive income. Net income is the
income stated in the income statement while other comprehensive
income includes the amounts that are recorded directly in
shareholders equity and that are not derived from
transactions with shareholders recorded directly in
shareholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 | |
|
|
September 22 | |
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
through | |
|
|
through | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
September 21, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
|
NIS millions | |
Net income according to US GAAP
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) reclassified to earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Adjustments in respect of derivatives, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5. |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
January 1 | |
|
|
September 22 | |
|
Nine Month Period | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
through | |
|
|
through | |
|
Ended September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
September 21, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are in NIS millions | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
677 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Exchange and linkage differences (erosion of) long- term
liabilities
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Interest on push-down debt (see Note 28C(2c3))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Capital losses (gains)
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Change in liability for employee severance pay
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for decline in value of land held for sale
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
|
598 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables (including long-term
amounts)
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other receivables (including long-term
amounts)
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in trade payables (including long-term
amounts)
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
F-52
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
January 1 | |
|
|
September 22 | |
|
Nine Month Period | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
through | |
|
|
through | |
|
Ended September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
September 21, | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
All amounts are in NIS millions | |
Increase (decrease) in other payables and credits (including
long-term amounts)
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Balance of cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The period from September 22, 2005 through
September 30, 2005 is presented under the new basis of
accounting within the nine month period ended September 30,
2005.
There is no difference between Israeli and US GAAP non cash
investing and financing activities other than the effect of
push-down accounting.
|
|
C. |
Differences between Israeli GAAP and US GAAP |
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
The Company, in accordance with Israeli GAAP, comprehensively
included the effect of price level changes in the accompanying
financial statements, as described in Note 2B through
December 31, 2003. According to such Israeli accounting
principles, the Company discontinued the adjustment for such
changes as of January 1, 2004. The adjusted amounts
included in the financial statements as at December 31,
2003 served as the starting point for the financial reporting at
January 1, 2004.
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
US GAAP does not provide for recognition of the effects of price
level changes and accordingly, the effects of such changes are
generally excluded from amounts determined in conformity with US
GAAP. However, in accordance with the guidance of the US
Securities and
F-53
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Exchange Commission for the reporting requirements by foreign
issuers, this difference between Israeli GAAP and US GAAP is not
included in this reconciliation to US GAAP.
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
Following the September 21, 2005 shareholders
transaction, DIC gained a 94.5% controlling interest in the
Companys ordinary shares, and 100% control of the
Companys voting rights. Under Israeli GAAP, the new basis
of accounting in the Company that resulted from DICs
purchase and controlling interest is not pushed down to the
financial statements of the Company.
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5J,
DICs purchase accounting adjustments, determined in
accordance with FAS 141, are pushed-down to the
Company, meaning the US GAAP financial information presented in
Note 28 reflects the new basis of accounting for the
Company as of September 21, 2005.
In addition, short-term loans incurred by DIC as a result of its
acquisition of the Company were pushed down to the
Companys financial statements from the date of
acquisition. The push-down debt has been classified as
short-term on the DIC financial statements, and was repaid in
full in January and March 2006 through dividend proceeds
received from the Company. Interest expenses, including tax
effects, on the push-down debt have been included in the
Companys income statement based on the actual interest
incurred by DIC and presented as a non-cash item in the
accompanying statements of cash flows and as a capital
contribution in the statement of shareholders equity.
|
|
|
a. New basis of
accounting: |
The purchase price paid as a result of the transaction described
above has been allocated to a proportionate amount of the
Companys underlying assets and liabilities based upon
DICs acquired interests (69.5%) in the respective fair
market values of assets and liabilities at the date of the
transaction. The following summarizes the fair values
attributable to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a
result of DICs acquisition of the Company. These values
exclude the proportionate share of the historical cost basis
attributable to the minority interest holders representing 5.5%
of the Company and to the 25% that DIC acquired for no
consideration as a founding shareholder, upon the Company
formation in 1994.
Allocation of 69.5% proportionate share acquired to major
components of assets and liabilities acquired (NIS amounts in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 21 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
Current assets
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
301 |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
Definite life intangible assets acquired licenses
|
|
|
346 |
|
Definite life intangible assets acquired customer base
|
|
|
714 |
|
Indefinite life brand name
|
|
|
468 |
|
F-54
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 21 | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total cash consideration paid for equity interests, including
direct acquisition cost
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Primary changes to the
balance sheet |
The primary changes to the balance sheet as of the date of
acquisition reflect the following push-down adjustments:
|
|
|
(1) The reduction of the carrying value of property, plant
and equipment, which have been recorded using the estimated
replacement cost fair market value; |
|
|
(2) The recording of a value for brand name; |
|
|
(3) The recording of a value for customer base; |
|
|
(4) Adjustment to deferred tax assets resulting from the
above changes; |
|
|
(5) The recording of a value for goodwill; |
|
|
(6) The recording NIS 2,970 millions of push-down debt; |
|
|
(7) The elimination of deferred revenue; |
|
|
(8) An increase to the shareholders equity in respect of
these adjustments. |
|
|
|
c. Primary changes to the
income statement |
The primary changes to the income statement as a result of the
acquisition include:
|
|
|
(1) A decrease in costs of revenue due to lower level of
depreciation from the reduced depreciable base of property,
plant and equipment; |
|
|
(2) An increase in costs of revenue due to amortization of
the acquired customer base; |
|
|
(3) An increase in interest expenses resulting from the
push-down debt; |
|
|
(4) A decrease in the deferred tax expenses resulting from
the above adjustments. |
Due to the impact of the changes resulting from the push-down
accounting adjustments described above, the annual income
statement and cash flows presentations separate the
Companys results into two periods: (1) the period
ending with the September 21, 2005 consummation of the
acquisition transaction and (2) the period beginning after
that date utilizing the new basis of accounting. The results are
further separated by a heavy black line to indicate the
effective date of the new basis of accounting. Similarly, the
current and prior period amounts reported on the balance sheet
are separated by a heavy black line to indicate the application
of a new basis of accounting between the periods presented.
|
|
|
d. Brand names and
goodwill |
The new basis of accounting resulted in new recorded values for
brand names and for goodwill as of September 21, 2005 to
reflect their estimated fair values. Neither of these intangible
assets is amortizable and they are therefore subject to annual
impairment testing.
F-55
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible
assets acquired in a purchase business combination and
determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized,
but instead tested for impairment at least annually in
accordance with the provisions of this Statement. The Company
had established September 30 as its annual impairment
testing date. An impairment test is also completed if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be
impaired.
Upon adoption of push-down accounting, the new basis of
accounting resulted in new recorded values for customer base as
of September 21, 2005 to reflect their estimated fair
values. The Company amortizes the customer base over
7 years according to the economic benefit expected from
those customers each period.
The Company is required to perform impairment tests for
long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long- Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), when the
Company determines that indicators of impairment are present.
Declines in market value of its business or the value of its
customer base that may be incurred prospectively may also
require additional impairment charges. No impairment charges
were recorded in the periods presented herein.
Amortization expenses relating to customer base for the period
from September 22, 2005 through December 31, 2005 and
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were NIS
50 million and NIS 125 million, respectively, the
cumulative amortization expenses of customer base as of
September 30, 2006 is NIS 175 million.
|
|
3. |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
The depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method,
on the basis of the estimated useful lives of the dominant
assets for each asset group. Upon adoption of the Israeli
Accounting Standard No. 27, starting January 1, 2007,
the Company will retroactively separate individual components
with estimated useful lives that are different from the entire
network, mainly transmission equipment such as fiber optic
cables and infrastructures (see Note 2U).
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
The Company depreciates each individual significant component
over its individual useful life. In addition, property, plant
and equipment are stated at historical cost or at the fair value
at September 21, 2005 to reflect the new basis of
accounting as a result of the pushdown. Depreciation is
recognized using the straight-line method. The impact
recognizing depreciation expense under US GAAP based on the
estimated lives of individual assets on shareholders
equity is NIS 346 million and NIS 380 million as of
December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
F-56
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
No separation of embedded derivatives is required under Israeli
GAAP.
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
The Company enters into commercial contracts (mainly for cell
site leases) in which a foreign currency derivative instrument
is embedded within the contract. This embedded
derivative is separated from the host contract and carried at
fair value when (1) the embedded derivative possesses economic
characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the
economic characteristics of the host contract and (2) a
separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would
qualify as a derivative instrument. The embedded foreign
currency derivatives are marked to market each reporting period
against net income.
|
|
5. |
Revenue recognition free air time sold together
with a handset |
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
The Company does not separately account for free monthly airtime
given in connection with sales of handsets, and recognized the
total consideration received in such transactions upon delivery
of the handset to the subscriber.
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
Pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, the
Company determined that the sale of a handset with accompanying
services constitutes a revenue arrangement with multiple
deliverables. Accordingly, consideration received for handsets,
up to their fair value, that is not contingent upon the delivery
of additional items (such as the services), is recognized as
equipment revenues upon the delivery of the equipment to the
subscriber, when all revenue recognition criteria are met.
Consideration for services is recognized as services revenues,
when earned.
Based on
EITF 00-21, the
Company separately accounts for free minutes given in connection
with the sales of handsets for transactions entered into from
January 1, 2004. Consequently, the Company allocates a
portion of the revenue generated from the sale of handsets to
the free minutes given, based on the relative fair values of the
minutes and handsets. The revenues associated with the free
minutes are then recognized over the service period.
|
|
6. |
Asset Retirement Obligations |
The Company is subject to asset retirement obligations
associated with its cell site operating leases. These lease
agreements contain clauses requiring the removal of equipment
and the restoration of the leased site at the end of the lease
term, creating asset retirement obligations.
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
The Company did not recognize a liability for asset retirement
obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long
lived assets as it is not required under Israeli GAAP. Effective
January 1, 2007, upon adoption of Standard No. 27, the
Company will recognize such liabilities.
F-57
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
The Company applied SFAS 143 Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143).
SFAS 143 requires that an asset retirement obligation
(ARO) associated with the retirement of a tangible long
lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which
it is incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting
increase in the carrying amount of the associated asset. The
cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized
ARO, is depreciated such that the cost of the ARO is recognized
over the useful life of the asset.
The ARO is recorded at fair value, and the accretion expense
will be recognized over time as the discounted liability is
accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the
ARO is measured using expected future cash out flows discounted
at the Companys credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.
|
|
7. |
Deferred issuance expenses in respect of debentures |
|
|
|
In accordance with Israeli GAAP: |
As from January 1, 2006, the Company has adopted Standard
No. 22 which was adopted on a prospective basis. The
comparative figures relating to prior periods were not restated.
In accordance with the guidelines of Standard No. 22
expenses in respect of financial liabilities are deducted from
the financial liabilities and taken into account in the
calculation of the effective interest. Until the adoption of
Standard No. 22, the Company presented the issuance
expenses in respect of the debenture as a deferred asset
separate from the liabilities, and amortized it over the life of
the associated debentures.
|
|
|
In accordance with US GAAP: |
Debenture issuance expenses are presented as a deferred asset
and are amortized as interest expense under the effective
interest method over the term of the debenture.
|
|
D. |
US GAAP (Supplementary Information) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for employee benefits, net
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Allowance for doubtful debts
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Hedging transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Tax losses
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Valuation allowance in respect of carryforward tax
losses
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment and other assets, net
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
F-58
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Push down adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
Push down interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes are included in the balance sheet as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since December 31, 2003, there has been no change to the
valuation allowance.
|
|
|
Reconciliation of income tax expense: |
A reconciliation of the theoretical tax expense computed on
earnings before taxes at the statutory tax rate and the actual
income tax provision is presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)- | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Income before income taxes as per the income statement
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax calculated according to the main tax rate
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible interest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Other Non-deductible expenses and non taxable income, net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Taxes in respect of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
F-59
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Period Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)- | |
|
|
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Change in deferred tax balances due to reduction in tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Assets retirement obligations: |
The changes in the asset retirement obligations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
|
NIS millions | |
Balance at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Liability settled during the period
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Accretion expenses
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New liability
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under US GAAP, SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information sets
forth the rules under which publicly traded companies are
obliged to disclose financial and descriptive information on
their business segments. Management is of the opinion that the
Company and its subsidiaries operate in a single business
segment as telecommunication services providers operating solely
within Israel.
|
|
4. |
New accounting standards |
In December 2004, the FASB issued revised
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
(SFAS No. 123(R)).
SFAS No. 123(R) sets accounting requirements for
share-based compensation to employees and requires
companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date
fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation.
SFAS No. 123(R) is effective in interim or annual
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As of June 30,
2006 and for all reported periods the Company did not have any
share based compensation available to employees; as
such the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have an
impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations
or financial position.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement
No. 3, or (SFAS No. 154).
SFAS No. 154 changes the accounting for and reporting
of a change in an accounting principle. The provisions of
SFAS No. 154 require, unless impracticable,
retrospective application to prior periods financial
statements of (i) all voluntary changes in accounting
principles and (ii) changes required by a new accounting
pronouncement, if a specific transition is not provided.
SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in
depreciation, amortization, or depletion
F-60
Cellcom Israel Ltd. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Financial
Statements (Continued)
method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as
a change in accounting estimate, which requires prospective
application of the new method. SFAS No. 154 is
effective for all accounting changes made in fiscal years
beginning after December 12, 2005. The Companys
adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated results of
operations or financial position.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertain Tax
Positions An Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes. It
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company is currently evaluating the effect that the application
of FIN 48 will have on its results of operations and
financial condition.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156 that
amends FASB Statements No. 140, Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The new
Statement should be adopted as of the beginning of the first
fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The
Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this new
statement at the required effective date will have a significant
effect in its results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value (replacing all prior definitions) and creates
a framework to measure fair value, but does not create any new
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective in
the first quarter of fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating how it may
affect its consolidated financial statements.
In its September 2006 meeting, the FASBs Emerging Issue
Task Force reached a consensus on Issue
No. 06-1,
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Service Provider
to Manufacturers or Resellers of Equipment Necessary for an
End-Customer to Receive Service from the Service Provider,
that if the consideration given by a service provider to a
manufacturer or reseller (that is not a customer of the service
provider) can be linked contractually to the benefit received by
the service providers customer, a service provider should
use the guidance in
EITF 01-9 to
characterize the consideration.
EITF 01-9 presumes
that an entity should characterize cash consideration as a
reduction of revenue unless an entity meets the requirements of
paragraph 9 of
EITF 01-9. Under
EITF 01-9, other
than cash considerations should be characterized as an expense.
If the service provider does not control the form of the
consideration provided to the service providers customer,
the consideration should be characterized as other than cash.
The consensus is effective for the first annual reporting period
beginning after June 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted
for financial statements that have not yet been issued. Entities
should recognize the effects of applying the consensus on this
Issue as a change in accounting principle through retrospective
application to all prior periods under Statement 154.
Adoption of this Issue is not expected to have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
F-61