6-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
September 25, 2006
BHP Billiton Limited
(Translation of registrants name into English)
180 Lonsdale Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F: þ Form 20-F
o Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934: o Yes þ No
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): n/a
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP Billiton Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 25 September 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
Karen Wood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Karen Wood |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Group Company Secretary |
|
|
Message from the Chief Executive Officer
At BHP Billiton we recognise the intrinsic link between sound sustainability performance and
long-term business viability. Our business Strategic Framework reflects this understanding,
presenting Licence to Operate as a key Framework element.
In 2006 we achieved strong performance in a global market facing significant increases in commodity
demand and sustainability performance expectations. On behalf of the Board and the management team,
I extend my thanks to not only our employees and contractors but also their spouses, partners and
families for helping our Company to achieve these results. The nature of our business means it
takes a strong team effort to achieve our goals, and we recognise and greatly value this support.
Broader macroeconomic trends affecting our organisation and sustainability priorities include the
increasing prominence of developing economies such as China, India and Brazil. In these parts of
the world there are several billion people who over the last four or five years have had a greater
opportunity to participate in economic development. At their current stage of development, raw
materials supply is critical. Through our own technology research, technology partnerships and
participation in broader industry initiatives, such as the International Council on Mining and
Metals and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, we aim to support the
sustainable growth of emerging markets.
While very good progress has been made in implementing our Fatal Risk Control Protocols, our
efforts have not been as effective as they need to be. Our thoughts
are with the families and friends of the three people who lost their lives while working at our
sites over the past year. We will continue to work tirelessly to achieve our goal of Zero Harm.
With the acquisition of WMC Resources Ltd in 2005, we are now a significant provider of uranium to
the global energy market. We recognise the concerns of some of our stakeholders arising from
involvement in this commodity and we
are taking a leadership position in demonstrating sound stewardship of this and, indeed, with all
of our products.
During the year we received advice that BHP Billiton would be included in an Australian Inquiry
into the United Nations (UN) Oil-For-Food Programme. Our involvement relates to the funding of a
shipment of wheat from Australia to Iraq in the mid 1990s. We are conducting our own internal
review and have committed to publicly report our findings, taking into account the results of the
Inquiry.
The continued growth in demand for our products has assisted us in the delivery of a very strong
financial performance. It has also, however, created significant stresses in our operations and the
industry more broadly as operations expand to meet demand. Skill shortages are a clear
manifestation of this and we have initiated a number of programs to address the issue. The
management team has also stressed that our commitment to sustainability must not be compromised in
meeting that demand.
Our commitment to spending 1 per cent of pre-tax profits (on a rolling three-year average) on
voluntary community programs
remains, which ensures that our host communities continue to share in our success both in the
short and long-term. Examples include our efforts to support the management of major infectious
diseases, such as HIV/AIDS and malaria.
Climate change remains a key focus area for the Company. We have maintained our programs to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions from our operations and continue to gain experience in carbon trading. We
also continue to fund a variety of climate change mitigation initiatives, such as the US FutureGen
project, the Australian Coal Associations COAL21 initiative and the Australian Cooperative
Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies.
Our Full Report on our website has again been prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting
Initiative 2002 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines and we believe it represents a balanced and
reasonable representation of our organisations economic, environmental and social performance. We
remain committed to the UN Global Compact, and this year we have expanded our reporting on UN
initiatives in our Full Report to show how we contribute to the achievement of the UN Millennium
Development Goals.
I welcome any feedback you have in relation to this Report and look forward to
reporting our progress again next year as we continue to focus on creating value for all our
stakeholders.
Chip Goodyear
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 5
|
|
1 |
Performance at a Glance HSEC Targets Scorecard
BHP Billitons Health, Safety, Environment and Community (HSEC) performance
(Baseline 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002 for reduction targets except where stated otherwise)
|
|
|
2
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
All sites with emissions greater than 100,000 tonnes per year of carbon dioxide equivalent7
are required to have and maintain energy conservation plans with specific targets |
All sites with emissions greater than 100,000 tonnes per year of carbon dioxide equivalent7
are required to have and maintain greenhouse gas management programs |
Aggregate Group target for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions per unit of production of 5 per
cent by 30 June 2007 |
All sites with fresh water consumption greater than 500 ML per year9 to have and
maintain water management plans |
Aggregate Group target of 10 per cent reduction in fresh water consumption per unit of production
by 30 June 2007 |
All sites5 to have and maintain waste minimisation programs |
Aggregate Group target of 20 per cent reduction in waste (excluding recycled and mining-related
materials, such as waste rock, tailings, coal reject and slag) per unit of production by 30 June
2007 |
All sites10 to have and maintain land management plans to protect and enhance agreed
beneficial uses |
Life cycle assessments prepared for all major BHP Billiton minerals products11
(incorporating participation in industry programs as appropriate) |
All sites10 to prepare public HSEC reports at a local level (including incidents,
community complaints and relevant site-specific emissions) on an annual basis |
All sites10 to have and maintain a community relations plan |
Aggregate contribution to community programs, including in-kind support, of a target of 1 per cent
of pre-tax profits, calculated on a three-year rolling average |
Energy conservation plans in place at 98 per cent of required sites and at eight sites that were
below the emissions threshold (FY05: 100%; 11 sites) |
Greenhouse gas management programs in place at 98 per cent of required sites and at seven sites
that were below the emissions threshold (FY05: 100%; 12 sites) |
During the year our greenhouse gas intensity index increased by 3 per cent, resulting in an overall
reduction to date of 8 per cent against the baseline8 |
Water management plans in place at 99 per cent of required sites and at 27 sites that were below
the usage threshold (FY05: 97%; 26 sites) |
During the year our water intensity reduced by 6 per cent, resulting in an overall increase to date
of 1 per cent against the baseline8 |
Waste minimisation programs in place at 97 per cent of required sites and at seven sites that were
not required to meet this target (FY05: 98%; 14 sites) |
During the year our general waste intensity index reduced by 14 per cent, resulting in an overall
reduction to date of 24 per cent against the baseline8 |
During the year our hazardous waste intensity index increased by 22 per cent, resulting in an
overall reduction to date of 38 per cent against the baseline8 |
Land management plans in place at 97 per cent of required sites and at 17 sites that were not
required to meet this target (FY05: 98%; 21 sites) |
Life cycle assessments (ISO14043 compliant) have been completed for all our major commodities |
HSEC reports were prepared by 95 per cent of required sites or businesses (FY05: 100%) |
Community relations plans in place at 98 per cent of required sites and at 11 sites that were not
required to meet this target (FY05: 98%; 22 sites) |
Expenditure totalled US$81.3 million, equivalent to 1.45 per cent of pre-tax profits on a
three-year rolling average (FY05: US$57.4 million; 1.59%) |
|
|
|
NOTES |
|
1. |
|
Controlled activities are work-related activities where BHP Billiton directly supervises and
enforces HSEC Management standards. |
|
2. |
|
Fines reported may relate to incidents that occurred in previous years. |
|
3. |
|
Prosecutions included are those that have been determined during the year and resulted in
fines. They may relate to incidents that occurred in previous years. The only exception is a
safety fine, which was received in the 2005 reporting period but was not reported last year as
it was being held in trust pending appeal. The fine became payable in the 2006 reporting
period. |
|
4. |
|
Issue 3 of the BHP Billiton HSEC Management Standards was introduced in September 2005. |
|
5. |
|
Includes 59 sites in total, excludes exploration and development projects, sites being
divested, closed sites, and offices. Also excludes recent acquisitions e.g. WMC, which have
two years to achieve compliance with target. |
|
6. |
|
A classified injury is any workplace injury that has resulted in the person not returning to
their unrestricted normal duties after the day on which the injury was received. |
|
7. |
|
Forty-eight sites have emissions greater than 100,000 tonnes per year of carbon dioxide
equivalent and, combined, account for 98 per cent of the Groups greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
8. |
|
The Groups intensity indices have been modified to exclude data from the Chrome business in
all years, including the base year, as it was divested. Ex-WMC sites data have not been
included in intensity indices as they were not part of the business when the baselines were
set. |
|
9. |
|
Forty-six sites have fresh water consumption greater than 500 ML per year and, combined,
account for more than 98 per cent of the Groups consumption. |
|
10. |
|
Excludes petroleum platforms, exploration and development projects, closed sites, and offices
with no significant community or land management issues.
Also excludes recent acquisitions, e.g. WMC, which have one year to achieve compliance with the
target. |
|
11. |
|
Excludes petroleum and diamonds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 5
|
|
3 |
Our Sustainability Challenges
Our sustainability challenges are those issues that we believe may have a material impact on our
ability to be a successful business.
We recognise that these challenges are critical to our employees, their families, our host
communities, the natural environment and the broader global community. |
These challenges have been identified through a range of stakeholder engagements, performance
benchmarking, internal audit and risk assessment activities. |
Our key sustainability challenges, not in order of importance and requiring parallel action, are:
4 |
|
Greenhouse Gas Emissions |
|
4 |
|
Access to and Management of Resources |
|
4 |
|
Sustainable Community Development and Closure of Operations |
|
4 |
|
Eliminating Fatal Risks |
|
4 |
|
Occupational and Community Health |
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Access to affordable energy, minerals and metals is a critical component of poverty alleviation and
social and economic development. Our challenge as a member of global society is to help meet the
worlds minerals and energy needs while mitigating the potential impact of greenhouse gas emissions
on the climate.
Our approach to this challenge includes controlling the emissions that we produce at our sites and
seeking ways to reduce the emissions produced by our customers when they consume our products, both
now and in the future.
Looking forward, we will... define a process for Australian operations to meet emerging Energy
Efficiency Opportunity legislation, participate in sector initiatives to define and share leading
energy efficiency practice and undertake further energy efficiency reviews at our sites to
continuously improve our performance.
Access to and Management of Resources
Our challenge is to achieve access to the resources relevant to our scope of operations while
addressing heightened political and societal expectations related to obtaining and maintaining a
licence to operate. In 2006 we expanded the scope of this challenge to consider access to water
and skills, recognising that both are as critical as land access in determining long-term business
viability.
Our approach to this challenge includes the implementation of land, water and biodiversity
management plans at sites, formal risk and impact assessments, skills development programs,
proactive stakeholder engagement and advocacy. For example, in conjunction with the International
Council on Mining and Metals and the World Conservation Union, we have undertaken not to explore or
mine in World Heritage properties.
Looking forward, we will... examine opportunities for biodiversity offsets and develop appropriate
performance metrics, develop a Company Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Guideline,
enhance strategies to attract and retain skilled people, and continue to improve our approach to
water
management.
SUSTAINABILITY AT BHP BILLITON |
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/sustainability/challenges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
5
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
1. Mitigating our greenhouse gas emissions is critical to our business, the global community and
the environment |
2. Access to fresh water and the ability to efficiently use this resource are critical
challenges for water-scarce areas |
3. We aim to provide a positive, lasting legacy for our host communities |
4. We aim to ensure that all employees and contractors understand and fully comply with all
safety standards |
5. The health of our employees and host communities is vital to the health of our business |
Sustainable Community Development and Closure of Operations
Our challenge is to maximise the benefits to communities during the operational phase of a site so
that a positive lasting legacy exists after closure.
Our approach to this challenge requires a consistent approach to the implementation of initiatives
that will be sustainable beyond the life of the project, while being careful to avoid creating
dependency on our support. This approach includes community participation and engagement, employee
involvement, compliance with our Company Closure Standard and sharing our financial success with
the communities in which we operate. Since 2002, the Company has met its target to spend 1 per cent
of pre-tax profits (on a rolling three-year average) on voluntary community programs.
Looking forward, we will... implement our Closure Standard at all controlled
operations1, share knowledge and leading practice among our network of closure and
rehabilitation practitioners, further integrate closure requirements into business systems and mine
planning processes, undertake human rights self-assessments and implement risk-based human rights
management plans at all sites.
Eliminating Fatal Risks
Our challenge is to fully implement and optimise the safety management standards we have developed.
We need to ensure that all of our employees and contractors understand, rigorously apply and fully
comply with these standards.
Our approach to this challenge includes effective leadership;
improving our awareness and behaviour; implementing and maintaining rigorous standards and systems
for managing risk; and developing and implementing our Fatal Risk Control Protocols.
Looking forward, we will... work with our contractors and suppliers to adopt standards and procedures
consistent with our own, introduce behaviour-based safety programs, monitor and learn from
near-miss incidents, implement and review the effectiveness of our Fatal Risk Control Protocols,
update our site risk registers annually and reduce our Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate. This
metric aims to improve the visibility of all workplace incidents by including the total number of
medical cases, not just the ones requiring time away from the workplace or a change in duties.
Occupational and Community Health
Our challenge is to improve quality of life through both work-based and community health programs.
This means we must promote an environment that contributes to our employees being both fit for work
and fit
for life.
We seek to apply a holistic approach to the management of health, targeting health impacts at work,
at home and in the broader community. This includes standardised procedures for measuring,
reporting and managing occupational exposure; Fit for Work/Fit for Life guidelines for managing
drug and alcohol abuse, fatigue management, occupational rehabilitation, health promotion, job and
task analysis and stress management; supporting major programs to combat infectious disease in the
regions where we operate and supporting activities that offer health benefits that extend beyond
the communities in which we operate (e.g. HIV/AIDS research).
Looking forward, we will... continue to implement our stringent Exposure Standards, increase our
focus on fatigue management, use of personal protective equipment and monitoring occupational
illness, work with other organisations to conduct HIV/AIDS immunotherapy trials, and further
develop our preparedness to respond in the event that avian flu affects our communities
1. |
|
Controlled operation is any operation owned and operated by BHP Billiton or managed
by the Company in a joint venture. |
SUSTAINABILITY AT BHP BILLITON |
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/sustainability/challenges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 5
|
|
5 |
Sustainability at BHP Billiton
Our vision for sustainable development is to be the company of choice creating sustainable value
for shareholders, employees, contractors, suppliers, customers, business partners and host
communities. Central to our vision is our aspirational goal of Zero Harm to people and the
environment.
We aim to create sustainable value through our willingness to invest for the future while ensuring
we deliver value in the shorter term.
The Business Case
Our bottom-line performance is dependent on ensuring access to resources and securing and
maintaining our licence to operate and grow. Maximising the bottom-line is, however, about
recognising the value protection and value add that can be achieved through enhanced performance in
non-financial aspects.
Beyond the Business Case
Beyond the business case described above, there are also many societal benefits that flow from
integrating aspects of sustainability into our business. These benefits include, but are not
limited to, contributing to improved standards of living and self-sustaining communities.
Our Strategy
Our sustainable development strategy comprises two dimensions a business dimension and a
sustainability dimension that together contribute to bottom-line performance.
The business dimension represents traditional contributors to a financially successful and
competitive business, as without a profitable business we are unable to contribute to the broader
goals of sustainability. Elements include business excellence and customer focus; portfolio
diversity; deep inventory of growth projects; and quality long-life assets.
The sustainability dimension includes aspiring towards zero harm to people, host communities and
the environment; ensuring effective governance and risk management processes are in place;
recognising the need to be socially responsible and contribute to sustainable community
development; and ensuring the broader economic contributions of our operations are effectively
injected into the regions where we operate.
Measuring Progress
At the operational level, we encourage our managers to increasingly seek out leading practice in
health, safety, environment and community performance.
On a strategic level, we encourage management teams to identify opportunities that drive
sustainable value creation.
Reduced business risk and enhanced business opportunities |
Enhanced Gaining and Improved Improved maintaining brand stakeholder standards our licence
to recognition trust of living operate and and reputation grow |
Enhanced Self-sustaining economiccommunities contributionsVALUE |
Enhanced Improved ability to operational
strategically |
performance Enhanced and plan for the Enhancement resource efficiency longer-term of
biodiversity conservation Improved work/life balance Improved Maintained attraction and security of
retention of our operations workforce |
Company value Societal value |
At the commodity level, we encourage our businesses to demonstrate stewardship by building
partnerships across the life cycles of our products to deliver broader business and societal
returns.
Engaging Stakeholders
Every day we interact with numerous people from varied backgrounds. We are committed to maintaining
and promoting dialogue with our stakeholders and remaining responsive to the global communitys
concerns and aspirations.
We recognise the importance of trust to relationship building. Being
accountable is paramount, as is transparency with our communications and documentation. Our
Charter, Sustainable Development Policy, HSEC Management Standards and Guide to Business Conduct
all promote a commitment to acting with honesty, integrity and fairness in all our activities.
Our key stakeholders are generally identified as people who are adversely or positively impacted by
our operations, those who have an interest in what we do, or those who have an influence on what we
do.
In 2006 our stakeholder engagements included:
|
|
regular interaction with consultative committees in the communities in which we operate |
|
|
|
bi-annual meetings with our Forum on Corporate Responsibility, that consists of representatives
of our senior management team, leaders of several key non-government organisations (NGOs), and
community opinion leaders |
|
|
|
a major dialogue session with a range of NGOs, socially responsible investment (SRI)
community, academia, government and employee representatives on biodiversity and uranium |
|
|
|
annual update to SRI representatives. |
SUSTAINABILITY AT BHP BILLITON |
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/sustainability/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Our Stewardship Approach
Stewardship is a principle that calls on all those involved in the product life cycle to share
responsibility for minimising the environmental and human impacts that result from the production,
use and disposal of the product.
BHP Billiton has embraced the concept of stewardship as an integral part of our commitment to
sustainable development. Our HSEC Management Standards define our approach to stewardship as the
means to ensure that the HSEC impacts, associated with resources, material, processes and products
are minimised and managed.
Key Stakeholders
In the life cycle of the commodities produced by BHP Billiton, key stakeholders include:
|
|
processors |
|
|
|
manufacturers |
|
|
|
users and end-users (recyclers/reusers/disposers) |
|
|
|
suppliers |
|
|
|
transport chain that links the different sectors. |
Our Products Life Cycle
The life cycle of our products varies depending on the nature of the product. For the majority of
our products the life cycle comprises:
|
|
resource extractors a BHP Billiton mine or oil field |
|
|
|
processors note that for some products, such as nickel and aluminium, we are both
the extractor and processor |
|
|
|
manufacturers |
|
|
|
users. |
At the end of the life cycle the product is reused, recycled or disposed of.
The four types of stewardship are illustrated below, using a generic product life cycle.
While material, process and product stewardship apply across the life cycle, resource stewardship
is most prominent in the early stages of the life cycle. Common to all parts of the life cycle are
the transport and marketing functions, as both play a critical role in stewardship.
Industry Initiatives
We are actively involved in several product stewardship initiatives, including:
|
|
Nickel Nickel Institute |
|
|
|
Copper International Copper Association |
|
|
|
Lead Green LeadTM project |
|
|
|
Silver Silver Research Consortium |
|
|
|
Diamonds and gold Council for Responsible Jewellery Practices and the Kimberley
Process Certification Scheme |
|
|
|
Uranium Uranium Industry Framework Steering Group and the World Nuclear
Association. |
Working with Others
Most mining and mineral processing companies do not traditionally integrate product manufacture
into their businesses. We, however, recognise that implementing stewardship principles in
collaboration with our key stakeholders has strong business merit through maintaining market
access, providing the
opportunities for product differentiation and maximising opportunities for recycling and reuse.
This year we engaged extensively with our specialist marketing personnel across the globe to
develop a clearer understanding of the role of marketing in the implementation of stewardship
principles, and how we can work collaboratively with our customers to reduce the negative impacts
of minerals production on the community and the environment.
Uranium Stewardship
With the acquisition of the Olympic Dam copper and uranium mine in South Australia last year, we
recognise the importance of demonstrating strong leadership in the management of this commodity.
Our uranium strategy recognises that to be a world leading supplier of uranium concentrate requires
a foundation based on uranium stewardship.
We are active members of the Australian Uranium Industry
Framework Steering Group and its Uranium Stewardship Working Group, and chair the World Nuclear
Association Uranium Stewardship Working Group.
Radiation safety is an integral consideration at all stages of the product life cycle. Personnel at
our Olympic Dam operation are monitored to ensure compliance with relevant standards. Road, rail
and ocean freight is approved by the Australian Safeguards Non Proliferation Office (ASNO). Our
exports approval process involves a variety of national and international agencies and we only sell
to countries approved under bilateral agreements with the Australian Government and which are
signatories to the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Stewardship Types Generic Product Life Cycle |
The same model can be expanded upon for each individual stage within the overall product life
cycle. |
MATERIAL STEWARDSHIP (Inputs: e.g. consumables, energy, water,
explosives, equipment) |
RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP (e.g. optimising recovery from an individual orebody) |
EXTRACTOR & PROCESSOR & MANUFACTURER & USER & REUSER |
Marketing Transport Marketing Transport Marketing Transport Marketing Transport |
PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP (e.g. life cycle of a commodity such as lead) |
PROCESS STEWARDSHIP (Outflows: e.g. emissions, leakages, waste,
greenhouse gases) |
SUSTAINABILITY AT BHP BILLITON |
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/sustainability/stewardship/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 5
|
|
7 |
Governance
At BHP Billiton we believe that to maintain our position as one of the worlds leading companies we
must commit to the highest standards of governance. Therefore, in addition to the corporate
governance processes that manage the broader affairs of the Company, we have a number of processes
in place to implement our commitment to sustainable development.
Structure and Responsibilities
Our organisation for sustainable development, as illustrated, is characterised by the following key
features:
|
|
the Sustainability Committee of the Board oversees HSEC matters across the Group |
|
|
|
business line management has primary responsibility and accountability for HSEC performance |
|
|
|
the HSEC function provides advice and guidance and advocates leading practices
directly and through a series of networks across the business |
|
|
|
executive remuneration is directly linked to performance indicators that include
health, safety, environment and community targets. |
Hierarchy of Systems and Documents
Our hierarchy of systems and documents, as illustrated, represents our HSEC management system and
other related Company policies and documents.
Central to our business is our Company Charter, which
states our overriding commitment to health, safety, environmental responsibility and sustainable
development.
Supporting the values of our Charter is our Sustainable Development Policy. While we strive to
deliver strong financial returns to shareholders, we fully recognise and deliver on our wider
responsibilities to our stakeholders: as the Policy states our objective is to be the company of
choice creating sustainable value for our shareholders, employees, contractors, suppliers,
customers, business partners and host communities. Integral to this is our aspirational goal of
Zero Harm.
The Guide to Business Conduct applies to our entire workforce, regardless of their specific job or
location. It provides employees and contractors with direction and advice on conducting business
and interacting with governments, communities and business partners.
The BHP Billiton HSEC Management Standards form the basis for the development and application of
HSEC management systems at all levels in the Company and represent a key process through which we
drive our contribution to sustainable development.
The Standards cover all operational aspects and activities across the entire life cycle of
operations that have the potential to affect HSEC, either positively or negatively. The terminology
Health, Safety, Environment and Community (or HSEC) has been utilised throughout the Standards to
highlight four key components of sustainable development. These are:
|
|
Health promoting and improving the health of the Companys workforce and host
communities |
|
|
|
Safety ensuring that safety values are not compromised, and providing a workplace
where people are able to work without being injured |
|
|
|
Environment promoting the efficient use of resources, reducing and preventing
pollution, and enhancing biodiversity protection |
|
|
|
Community |
|
|
|
internal community engaging regularly with employees and contractors |
|
|
|
|
external community engaging regularly with those affected by our
operations, including our host communities |
|
|
|
|
human rights understanding, promoting and upholding fundamental
human rights within BHP Billitons sphere of influence. |
Central to
the HSEC Management Standards is a requirement for an auditing process to check that our Charter, Sustainable
Development Policy and HSEC Management Standards are being applied and to verify performance.
Procedures, protocols, guidelines and toolkits have also been developed to provide guidance and
support in implementing our HSEC Management Standards.
Sustainable Development Organisational Structure |
Risk & Audit Sustainability Committee
BHP Billiton Board
Committee of the Board of the Board
Global Ethics Executive
Corporate HSEC
Panel Management*
Customer CSG HSEC
Sector Groups Representatives
Site Line
HSEC Personnel
Management |
*Authority to manage the business is delegated to the CEO. The CEO on-delegates authority to
committees, including the Office of the Chief Executive and the Executive Committee, and
individuals. |
Hierarchy of Systems and Documents |
OTHER KEY POLICIES AND DOCUMENTS |
Guide to Business Conduct Enterprise-Wide Risk |
Policy on Independence Management Policy Sustainable of Directors Employment Principles
Development Policy COMPANY |
Closure Standard Crisis and Emergency - Investment Process Manual
Management
Systems HSEC Management WIDESYSTEMS and Standards Standards Fatal Risk Control
Protocols Records Disposal Manual Carbon Pricing Protocol Fit for Work/Fit for Life
Anti-Trust Protocols Incident Cause Analysis Procedures, Protocols, |
Method (ICAM) Guidelines and Toolkits
Business-based HSEC
Management SystemsSYSTEMS BUS
IN ESS
Operational HSEC Procedures - |
GOVERNANCE OUR APPROACH |
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/governance/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Our Performance Governance
Risk Management
Comprehensive risk registers are maintained at our operations and within our business groups. Risks
are identified and assessed using the common methodology specified in our Enterprise-Wide Risk
Management (EWRM) Standards.
Our HSEC risk assessment methodology has been further refined, including an external benchmarking
program, to further improve the identification, understanding and effective management of potential
catastrophic events.
Our operational risk assessment methodology has been developed to provide quantitative
justification for risk-reduction investments. The methodology has been piloted at three major port
operations and an alumina refinery.
We have continued with our efforts to fully integrate risk
management into our key business processes such as Business Development, Global Supply, Asset
Protection and the Global Maintenance Network.
Management Systems Review
Our Sustainable Development Policy has been translated into ten languages and rolled out to all
operating assets and businesses. The Policy is supported by a comprehensive Policy Guide and
training materials.
The second triennial Company-wide HSEC audit cycle was marked by the rollout of our revised and
more stringent HSEC Management Standards. In the current reporting year, 15 audits were completed
against the broader scope of the revised HSEC Management Standards.
Business Conduct
We recognise the need to continuously reinforce and refresh business conduct principles. A key part
of the assurance process is an annual communication by the Chief Executive Officer to his direct
reports to ensure that the Guide to Business Conduct has been rolled out and understood. This
requirement is then cascaded through the Company. Communication of the Guide is facilitated with
posters, a printed summary version of the Guide, electronic information and other communication
tools. An addendum was produced in February 2006 to reflect the adoption of a new regional fraud
hotline service and the Sustainable Development Policy.
During the year we received advice that BHP Billiton would be included in an Australian Inquiry
into the UN Oil-For-Food Programme. Our involvement relates to the funding of a shipment of wheat
from Australia to Iraq in the mid 1990s. We are conducting our own internal review and have
committed to publicly report our findings, taking into account the results of the Inquiry. The
internal review is well
advanced and includes an assessment of compliance by BHP Billiton and its employees with the law
and with its own business conduct requirements. It will also include a report on remedial actions.
The Board took a decision in October 2005 to cease the trial of a whistle-blowing service in South
Africa. We have returned to running one globally consistent in-house system.
There were 81 enquiries to the Business Conduct Helpline and Fraud Hotline systems in the year to
30 June 2006. The most common issues related to gifts, human resources, conflict of interest and
harassment/pornography. 59 per cent of calls originated from Australia, 19 per cent from southern
Africa and 19 per cent and 2 per cent respectively from South and North America. |
Business Conduct and Fraud Hotline Enquiries By Category 2005/06 |
Gifts 16% Harassment/ Pornography 14% Human Resources 15% Conflict of Interest 12%
Use of Company Property/Resources 8% Outside Activities 3% Other 32% |
Audit and Self-Assessment
With the revision of the HSEC Management Standards and the Audit and Self-Assessment Protocols
during the previous reporting period, learnings from the first triennial audit cycle are being
taken into account in this years audit process. Fifteen site audits have been conducted against
the revised HSEC Management Standards since October 2005. A total of 106 audits have been conducted since the
audit program commenced in September 2001, involving 318 BHP Billiton personnel and external
auditors.
As in previous years, operating sites not audited during the year were required to undertake
self-assessments against the Standards. The results from these 61 self-assessments have been
combined with the audit results to give the average level and range of conformance for each of the
Standards presented in the graph. An overall conformance of 3.9 out of 5 was achieved against the
revised and more stringent HSEC Management Standards (Issue 3) and is on track to meet our target
of full conformance (a score of greater than 4 out of 5) with the Standards by 30 June 2008. |
Audit and Self-Assessment Scores against each of the HSEC Management Standards |
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard
Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard |
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/governance/ourPerformance/ |
GOVERNANCE OUR PERFORMANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 5
|
|
9 |
Our Performance Health
The health and wellbeing of people is central to the success of our business and, accordingly,
understanding the potential for health risks and establishing suitable mitigation measures are
integral to the success of our journey towards Zero Harm.
Health risks continue to be an area where
we are attempting to reduce potential short and long-term impacts. These health risks are diverse
in the areas in which we operate and are not only related to work processes. Significant
community-based health risks exist in our business, and we continue to contribute to the management
of these issues on both a local and global basis.
Fit for Work/Fit for Life
Efforts to implement our Fit for Work/Fit for Life initiative continued during the current
reporting year. This Company-wide initiative was launched in the previous reporting year to assist
our drive towards Zero Harm by seeking to promote a consistent approach to the management of health
issues in the work environment. The initiative recognises that many health issues have not only the
potential to impact on our safety performance, but can also cause community issues, and
consequently impact on our ability to contribute to sustainable development.
During the reporting
year two Practice Leaders were appointed to assist sites with the implementation of the program,
with one of these positions specifically focused on fatigue management, which is a complex issue of
risk within the Company.
Occupational Illnesses
During the year, 123 new cases of occupational illness* were reported throughout the Company, a
reduction from 152 last year, resulting in an overall reduction to date of 46 per cent against the
baseline numbers for 2002/03. The breakdown of these new illnesses is shown in the graph below.
This reduction in new cases of occupational illness means we are on target to exceed the 20 per
cent reduction target across the Company by June 2007.
New Illnesses by Type 2005/2006
New Illnesses by Type 2005/06 |
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss 32% |
All Respiratory Disease 32% |
Repetitive Trauma (excluding noise) 12% |
· An occupational illness is an illness that occurs as a consequence of work-related
activities or exposure. |
Occupational Exposures
When compared to the previous period, potential exposures to noise, if not for the use of personal
protective equipment (PPE), have decreased by 6 per cent across the Company. For other exposures
there has been a 10 per cent decrease in exposures expressed as a percentage of employees, if not
for the use of PPE. This is a result of our concerted efforts to reduce these exposures over time.
We will continue our focus on this challenge to further improve these figures.
Managing potential exposure to substances that may cause cancer is a major concern for the Company.
Our Diesel Particulate Initiative, which focuses on reducing exposure to diesel exhaust fumes, has
been taken to our underground mining operations where the potential for exposure is highest.
We
have also initiated a research program with an external manufacturer to explore technology to
further reduce acid mist exposure that occurs in some of our metal processing plants. Other
principal exposures relate to dust, heat, welding fumes and vibration. Vibration exposures mainly
occur in drivers of earthmoving equipment and in the
longer term may result in back injury or pain. In addition to other health and safety
modifications, we continue to work to reduce vibration exposures as part of our strategic alliance
with Caterpillar, our major earthmoving equipment supplier.
Percentage of Employees in Potential Exposures* 2005/06
Unit: Per cent (%) |
Between Action Level and Occupational Exposure Limit |
Greater than Occupational Exposure Limit |
Greater than Noise Exposure Limit |
* i.e. would be exposed if not wearing PPE. Action Level is 50% of the Occupational
Exposure Limit. |
AluminiumBase Metals
Carbon Steel Materials
Steel StainlessMaterials
Energy Coal Petroleum |
Diamonds and Specialty Products |
Community Health
Malaria is a significant health issue for our operations in Mozambique and Brazil, and in many
other areas where we have development activities. During the year we continued our support of the
Medicines for Malaria Venture to develop new anti-malarial medication. The Venture, established
through the World Health Organisation, aims to provide affordable anti-malarial drugs to people in
disease-endemic countries. Concurrently, we continued our support of the mosquito spraying program
in southern Africa.
In the Northwest Territories of Canada, tuberculosis is a significant issue
among the Inuit population, which, as a consequence, has an impact on our EKATI Diamond Mine
operation. Our study in EKATI to limit the spread of tuberculosis is progressing through stages of
approval prior to its full implementation.
The HIV/AIDS immunotherapy project initiated during the previous year has progressed to a point
where it is hoped that a clinical trial will commence in the coming year. BHP Billiton has assisted
in recruiting other organisations to provide funding and has provided logistic support and funding
to develop the early stages of the clinical trial program. If this treatment proves successful, it
will potentially provide an approach to the epidemic that can be delivered to a wider number of the
affected population, and reduce the often significant compliance issues and costs associated with
anti-retroviral medication.
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/health/ourPerformance/ |
|
|
|
10
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Our Performance Safety
The safety of our employees, contractors and the communities in which we operate is an integral
part of our business. Our goal is Zero Harm.
To this end, we seek to create a mindset and an environment where people believe it is possible to
work injury free regardless of where they are in the world, what role they undertake or in which
business they work.
Across the Company we manage safety through our risk-based HSEC Management Standards. Our business
line managers are accountable for the implementation of these Standards and responsible for
ensuring that supporting systems and procedures are in place. We are confident that our Standards
and associated systems are the right ones, and have directed our efforts towards the effective and
consistent implementation of these across the organisation.
Fatal Risk Control Protocols
The Fatal Risk Control Protocols (FRCPs) were developed in 2003 with the goal of establishing clear
expectations for managing identified risk areas at leading-practice level. In 2005 Global FRCP
Facilitators were appointed for each of the Protocols to act as a subject matter expert in
assisting sites with meeting and understanding the Protocol requirements.
In the current reporting year our focus has been on ensuring continued compliance and supporting
the former WMC assets in the implementation of the Protocols. Facilitators have analysed shortfalls
in the implementation of the Protocols that contributed to significant incidents across the Company
and presented this information to sites and management. Guidelines for the effective implementation
of each Protocol and an online leading practice library have been developed. To further share
knowledge, we continued our support of a dedicated FRCP intranet site and Community of Practice.
Contractor Partnering and Engagement
A key focus of our safety management systems is working closely with our contractors to ensure
their safety approach and management systems align with ours. In 2005/06, contractors represented
64 per cent of our total workforce.
During the reporting year we conducted forums in Australia and South America where CEOs of our
contract partners joined us to discuss our safety approach and how we can work together to drive
improvement. A similar forum is also planned for southern Africa in late 2006. To complement this
we also conducted Contractor Safety Training Seminars in Australia, South America and southern
Africa that targeted both Company and contractor representatives from our operations. As a result,
the Contractor
Despite a significant improvement in our overall safety efforts, we are saddened to report that
three fatal incidents occurred during the reporting period at our controlled operations. This is
compared to three in the previous period. Each of these incidents has been thoroughly investigated,
utilising our Incident Cause Analysis Methodology (ICAM), with lessons learnt shared across the
organisation. |
Fatalities at Controlled Operations 2001/02 to 2005/06 |
Safety
Management Course was expanded to include health and environment. Ongoing assistance with safety training was also provided by our three regional training leaders
appointed this year. Our FRCP Global Facilitators can also assist contractors with aligning their
safety systems to those of the Company.
Significant Near Miss Reporting
A key platform of our improvement strategy is to promote, encourage and recognise high levels of
significant near miss reporting as a positive and healthy indicator of:
|
|
shortcomings in the application of our systems and procedures |
|
|
|
high safety awareness of potential hazards and risks in the workplace |
|
|
|
invaluable free lessons to assist in the prevention of fatalities |
|
|
|
openness, trust and transparency of reporting |
|
|
|
increased safety maturity. |
This reporting year we had a threefold increase in the number of significant near misses reported,
providing us with our most valuable information for improvement. These near misses are tracked and
reported against the FRCP categories. Analysis indicates that the key exposures and areas for
improvement are surface mobile equipment, isolation and working at heights. Where analysis
indicates a high frequency of repeat events, we issue a
Classified Injury Frequency Rate |
A classified injury is any workplace injury that results in the person not returning to their
unrestricted normal duties after the day on which the injury was received. The Classified Injury
Frequency Rate (CIFR) |
is the number of classified injuries per million work hours. |
In the current reporting year, CIFR increased from 3.9 to 4.8, in part due to a range of
acquisitions and divestments made in the previous reporting period. Encouragingly, the duration
rate, which measures the impact of injuries on people, decreased by 28 per cent. We are confident
that we are on track to meet our target of a 50 per cent reduction in CIFR by 30 June 2007 against
the baseline year 2001/02. |
Classified Injury Frequency Rate Comparable Performance 2001/02 to 2005/06 |
01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 |
injuries per million work hours Classified |
01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 |
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate |
In June 2005, we started monitoring Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) as the means to
track injuries in our Company. This move aims to improve the visibility of all workplace incidents
by including the total number of medical treatment cases per million work hours (excluded from
CIFR). In 2005/06 we recorded a TRIFR of 8.7. Although this result compares favourably with
international benchmarks (see Full Report), we take no comfort from our relatively good
performance and our goal remains Zero Harm. |
Repeat Incident Alert. This Alert highlights common issues and lessons and is directed to both
management and individuals involved in the activities.
This year we also commenced highlighting Zero Barrier Incidents: close-call events where key
preventative barriers were breached. Our ability to take heed of the signals from near miss events
is crucial to our efforts in eliminating injuries and fatalities.
http://sustainability.bhpbilliton.com/2006/safety/ourPerformance/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 5
|
|
11 |
Our Performance Environment
Our objectives for environmental management are outlined in our Sustainable Development Policy,
which states that we will:
|
|
strive to achieve leading industry practice |
|
|
|
meet or, where less stringent than our standards, exceed applicable legal and other
requirements |
|
|
|
set and achieve targets that promote efficient use of resources and include reducing
and preventing pollution |
|
|
|
enhance biodiversity protection by assessing and considering ecological values and
land-use in our activities. |
Environmental Incidents
During the reporting period three significant environmental incidents were reported: the accidental
release of a leaching solution at the Tintaya mine (Peru) and a release of mine-impacted water at
the Optimum Colliery (South Africa). A small oil spill from the Liverpool Bay Lennox platform
(United Kingdom) was also reported. In all cases, remedial actions were put in place to mitigate
impacts, stakeholders were notified and investigations undertaken. Longer-term corrective and
preventative actions have been identified and are being implemented. Our definition of
significant is conservative to ensure all learnings are captured from relevant HSEC incidents.
Closure
Our Closure Standard requires each asset to review its existing closure plan and make adjustments
to align with the requirements of the Standard. The reviews will be finalised next year and include
a rigorous assessment of site-specific closure risks, identification of risk management actions and
the development of reasonable and accurate closure cost estimates. To assist this process a series
of closure planning workshops was convened during the reporting year and a Community of Practice
was established.
Biodiversity
Biodiversity is a critical aspect of environmental management and we are working to integrate this
consideration into our business activities. Over the reporting period, 31 sites contributed to
biodiversity-related research and development, with expenditure totalling US$2.68 million. In
addition, 48 sites reported engaging in biodiversity-related activities, in addition to ongoing
rehabilitation.
Resource Use
Our energy, water, waste and land targets are focused upon driving initiatives that promote the
efficient use of resources.
Land
The total footprint of land owned, leased or managed was 3.2 million hectares, of which 4 per cent
is used for mining, processing plants and infrastructure.
The amount of land newly disturbed over the reporting period was around 5,000 hectares, a similar
level to last year. Land rehabilitated increased by 30 per cent to 2,410 hectares, largely due to
additional rehabilitation at closed sites in the Base Metals Customer Sector Group (CSG).
Energy
Our energy consumption decreased slightly from 309 petajoules in the previous reporting period to
304 petajoules.
Water
Access to water is one of our key sustainability challenges. High-quality water consumption
amounted to 170,250 megalitres, increasing from 153,170 megalitres reported last year. The increase
was due to additional consumption associated with the inclusion of former WMC interests. Our
Stainless Steel Materials and Carbon Steel Materials CSGs continued to be the major consumers of
fresh water. Initiatives to reduce high-quality water consumption included improved metering;
auditing; water balance assessments; increased recycling and reuse of mine water, stormwater and
grey water; and implementing training and awareness programs.
Waste
Our operations generated 235,460 tonnes of general waste in the reporting period, of which 30 per
cent was recycled, reused, or composted; 68 per cent was disposed to landfill (a slight increase on
last year); and 2 per cent was incinerated. 43,530 tonnes of hazardous waste were disposed of
compared with 67,710 tonnes last year, largely due to the divestment of some Stainless Steel
Materials CSG interests.
Emissions
Central to our goal to achieve Zero Harm to the environment is our focus on reducing and preventing
pollution.
Greenhouse Gases
Our total greenhouse gas emissions amounted to 51 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, a
similar level to that reported in the previous reporting period. Major contributions were from
aluminium smelters and Carbon Steel Material CSG operations.
Footnote to graphs
|
|
|
1. |
|
The intensity indices have been modified to exclude Chrome which was divested. Ex-WMC
sites data has not been included in intensity indices as they were not part of the
business when the baseline was set but are included in all aggregate data. |
|
|
|
The intensity index has been developed as a Company-wide performance indicator on environmental
parameters, such as energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and high quality water consumption. The
index concept allows performance from different business groups or sites, all of which may have
different operating conditions and product mixes, to be added together to form an overall
indicator per unit of production. The baseline year for the intensity indices is BHP Billitons
fiscal year 2001/02 and has a value of 100 for that year. |
|
|
|
12
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Our Performance Community
Building relationships and partnerships is really at the heart of our business. There is very
little we can do on our own our ability to work cooperatively with others, from business partners
and governments through to non-government organisations and host communities, impacts both directly
and indirectly on our business.
The range of activities our community relations practitioners are required to undertake to
build relationships continues to grow, as we aspire to achieve our goal of sharing our success and
being valued by our host communities.
Key activities include educating and informing stakeholders about our operations, responding to
queries, providing opportunities to build a strong dialogue process so stakeholders can freely
express their views and opinions, and facilitating their participation in decision-making in
aspects of our business that relate to them. We aim to support community development by providing
training and employment opportunities for local people and supporting local businesses.
The diversity of locations, languages and cultures that frame our interactions with people from our
host communities adds a further layer of complexity to the task. Community practitioners play a
critical role in building relationships in an area that is challenging but that has the potential
to be extremely rewarding. During the year we have focused on our people and how we can better
support them in these important roles, knowing that they are key to ongoing improvements in our
social performance.
Community Relations
Our HSEC Management Standard 7 forms the basis of our approach to communication, consultation and
participation with stakeholders. The intent is that effective, transparent and open communication
and consultation is maintained with stakeholders associated with BHP Billiton activities.
Stakeholders are encouraged to participate in and contribute to sustainable development through
HSEC performance improvement initiatives.
In line with our HSEC target, 98 per cent of sites
required to have community relations plans have operational plans in place or were covered by a
regional plan developed by the business group. This result is the same as for the last reporting
period, with only one site yet to formalise their community relations plan.
For sites required to have a site-based HSEC Report, 95 per cent of sites had done so, which is
slightly lower than the 100 per cent achieved last year. Two assets that met this target in 2004/05
and one of our newer assets have not produced Reports this financial year.
Global Community Network
In March 2006 the Company formalised and launched its Global Community Network. The Network now has
over 260 members throughout the Company and around the world, including community relations
practitioners, HSEC personnel and asset managers. The purpose of this Network is to provide
employees with a range of resources and knowledge-sharing opportunities to assist them in achieving
best practice community relations outcomes. To aid this process, the Network conducted an Internal
Capacity Building Survey of all Network members in May 2006 to identify current skills and
potential training and development needs within the Companys community function.
The Global Community Network has identified four key social issues that form the basis of its work
program for the current and future reporting periods. These issues include Human Rights (including
Indigenous Rights), Stakeholder Relationships, Social and Economic Impacts and Community
Development. To address these key issues, four Network workgroups have been established to focus on
social requirements in project tollgating, measurement of socio-economic contributions, community
development project evaluation and assessment, and internal capacity building.
Community Contributions
In 2005/06, the Employee Matched Giving Program was rolled out globally to all BHP Billiton managed
sites. During 2005/06, BHP Billiton contributed US$824,230 to around 400 not-for-profit
organisations to match its employees cash contributions, volunteering and fundraising activities.
In response to the devastating earthquake in Pakistan in October 2005, we joined with the
Government of Pakistan and local and international NGOs to support relief efforts through financial
contributions of US$310,000. With the help of local and worldwide employees and matched donations
from our Matched Giving Program, the Companys total contributions reached more than US$600,000 to
the earthquake relief efforts, which was used for urgent humanitarian programs, the reconstruction
of houses, medical supplies and mobile medical units.
This year we commenced mapping our Community Contributions spend against the United Nations
Millennium Development Goals, recognising that the intent of the Goals align with our
sustainability values and presents a consistent global framework for measuring tangible progress.
We aim to further enhance our approach to reporting against the Goals in the next reporting period.
Human Rights
Our Human Rights Self-Assessment toolkit is used by sites to assist them in appraising their
potential exposure to human rights issues. The toolkit has been revised and updated in
collaboration with all CSGs to integrate it with our risk management processes and ensure
consistency with our target of ensuring there are no transgressions of the principles of the UN
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Thirty-five sites have reported that they have completed the Human Rights Self-Assessment this year
and many have undertaken training of site and security personnel. We continue to recognise that
training is a key area requiring improvement, and this will be addressed as part of the Global
Community Network work program.
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 20065
|
|
13 |
Our Performance Socio-Economic
The socio-economic aspects of our operations relate to how we manage our people and contribute to
the economies within which we operate. Our priorities are:
|
|
our relationships with our employees and contractors: development of our leaders;
diversity, including Indigenous employment; training; remuneration and other benefits of
our employees |
|
|
our economic contribution to society: the payments we make to governments, including
taxes and royalties, and the added value we provide as a result of our operations and
their broader contributions through aspects such as payments to suppliers and employees. |
Employee Relations
Employee relations at BHP Billiton is the responsibility of local and business unit management.
Each business is required to:
|
|
implement employment arrangements that deliver outcomes consistent with our Charter,
Sustainable Development Policy and Guide to Business Conduct |
|
|
build open and productive relationships with employees and provide processes to
address workplace issues in an equitable manner |
|
|
ensure that employees have the opportunity to develop skills that allow them to
contribute to business success, and are recognised and rewarded for those results |
|
|
support fundamental human rights and freedom of association and ensure legal
requirements governing employment are fully met |
|
|
respect local legislative requirements and other local standards and circumstances. |
Diversity
Approximately 7 per cent of our Companys management are women, including one of our non-executive
Directors, our Company Secretary and the President of Gas and Power. About 12 per cent of full-time
employees at operated sites and offices are women.
We recognise that diversity issues are particularly sensitive at some specific sites and countries.
Examples of ongoing policies and programs to address employment diversity issues include employment
equity in South Africa and targeted indigenous employment programs in Australia, Canada, and the
United States.
Recognising the historic employment equity issues of South Africa, this year we
achieved our target of 40 per cent representation by designated groups1 at senior
management level and middle management level and are trending towards the target at senior
management level.
In support of Indigenous employment and training, this year we implemented a range of initiatives:
7.2 per cent of Iron Ore employees are Indigenous, 20 per cent of the Groote Eylandt permanent
workforce is from Indigenous descent and 57 per cent of EKATI Diamonds skilled or professional
employees are Northern Aboriginal.
Supply
We seek to ensure that the contracting of services, the purchase, hire or lease of equipment and
materials, and activities with partners are carried out so as to minimise any adverse HSEC
consequences and, where possible, to enhance community development opportunities. Our objective is
to ensure that standards and procedures adopted by our contractors are consistent with BHP Billiton
standards.
We recognise the value to local economies that can be delivered through our activities and
consequently seek to encourage the development of local contractors and the use of local suppliers
wherever possible. For example, our Black Economic Empowerment Procurement Policy has been rolled
out at all South African operations.
Our Supply Optimisation in Emerging Markets (SOiEM) Team is focusing on supply chain governance as
we look to procurement in new markets such as China and India.
Building on a broad supplier screening process, we are further developing our approach to business
conduct and human rights screening of suppliers to ensure that we only select suppliers after
careful consideration of both commercial factors and observed sustainability performance.
Economic Contributions
The economic contribution we make to society is much more than the financial profits we derive. Our
contribution includes the value that flows from the broader contributions of our operations, such
as payments to our employees and suppliers, and disbursements to governments, including taxes and
royalties.
BHP Billiton supports the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. We are committed to
working with our host governments that participate in this process and develop systems to report
these payments.
In 2006, two of our South American mines participated in the International Council on Mining and
Metals Resource Endowment Project to understand how to promote better socio-economic outcomes in
natural resource development projects.
|
|
|
1. |
|
Designated groups are defined by the South African Employment Equity Act as
African, Coloured, Indian and disabled males and females, and white females. |
|
|
|
14
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Policy in Action Case Studies
The case studies listed below appear in our Full Sustainability Report. They present examples of
issues, initiatives, projects and programs across the Group and highlight some of the
sustainability opportunities and challenges faced by our operations. In this Summary Report, we
present in abbreviated form the five case studies indicated in colour.
Health
|
|
Employee Health Read how BMA and Iron Ore are helping employees monitor and manage
their health |
|
|
Health Management Kwinana Nickel Refinery conducts an industry-first baseline study
of ingested nickel in employees |
|
|
Community Health Clinics Valesul and Hotazel are helping to improve health
standards in local communities |
|
|
HIV/AIDS The Ethembeni Care Centre is a Place Of Hope in southern Africa |
|
|
Exposure Management Pioneering technology for unloading coal dump wagons at BMA Hay
Point alleviates employee health issues |
Safety
|
|
Road Safety Mt Arthur Coal, Minera Spence and Mozal demonstrate the programs to
manage risks associated with vehicles and mobile equipment |
|
|
Safety Leadership Minera Spence employees SPOT the safety difference and Mozal
achieves a safety breakthrough |
|
|
Confined Space Management An innovative tank cleaning system reduces the time
people spend working in confined spaces |
|
|
Learning from Fatalities Escondida and Mozal turn the hard lessons of fatalities
into substantial improvements in safety |
|
|
Heavy Equipment Illawarra Coal sets new standards with design for Operators Cabin
in Load-Haul-Dump equipment |
|
|
Aviation Safety Company-wide Aviation Standards and Guidelines address the risks
associated with flying |
|
|
Safety in the Supply Chain Our global Caterpillar alliance, deepwater drilling in
the Gulf of Mexico and integrating local contractors into site-based HSE management
systems show how we work with contractors to ensure their safety |
Environment
|
|
Stewardship Minimising coal loss during the mining process, supporting responsible
jewellery practices and researching the feasibility of third-party certification of
minings environmental and social performance demonstrate how we have embraced the
principle of stewardship |
|
|
Waste Recycling and Reuse Alumar provides coal fines as a substitute for coke
burned at a cement plant in the region. |
|
|
Rehabilitation and Closure Petangis, San Juan and San Manuel are testimony to our
approach to closure planning |
|
|
Biodiversity Our Arid Recovery Program, camera trapping program in Suriname and
approach to managing pastoral leases demonstrate how we manage the values of biodiversity |
|
|
Spills Management Angostura helps a local community to safeguard their environment
in the event of an oil spill |
|
|
Water Management Ingwes Emalahleni Water Reclamation Project is a sustainable
solution to a critical water issue |
|
|
Energy Efficiency EKATI shows how we can all reduce greenhouse gas emissions and
help mitigate climate change |
|
|
Environmental Management EKATI and Olympic Dam engage our stakeholders in ways to
reduce our environmental footprint |
Community
|
|
Education Partnering with Government in Western Australia, supporting South African
Community Early Learning Centres and funding the Australian Tools for Change Program are
just some of the ways we support education |
|
|
Disaster Relief Where host communities are prone to natural disasters such as
Pakistan, Chile, Trinidad and Tobago, and the US Gulf States we help them with both
disaster planning and relief |
|
|
Alcohol Management GEMCO and Iron Ore are helping communities address the problems
associated with higher than average rates of alcohol consumption |
|
|
Community Partnerships Illawarra Coal and Escondida show the value associated with
having community ownership of community programs |
|
|
Community Development Improving sanitation and providing clean water is enhancing
living standards in Pakistan |
|
|
Community Consultation and Engagement Read how we employ a range of techniques to
ensure different communities, such as local Peruvians and semi-nomadic Bedouin people in
Algeria, are informed about our operations and that they have opportunities to express
their views and engage in decision-making |
|
|
Indigenous Governance The Indigenous Governance Awards are providing important
lessons about how to overturn disadvantage in Indigenous communities |
|
|
Cultural Heritage A heritage study of a proposed gas plant site in Australias
Pilbara region is providing local Indigenous people with valuable information from the
past |
Socio-Economic
|
|
Working in Emerging Markets The Company takes up the challenge of procuring
supplies from emerging markets |
|
|
Skills Development Project Greenshoots and BMAs Skills for Growth are helping to
attract and retain people |
|
|
Diversity Building the profile of women in our workforce increases the diversity of
our employee base |
|
|
Indigenous Skills Development and Employment EKATI and GEMCO lead the way in
promoting employment and business opportunities for local Indigenous peoples |
|
|
Mining Impact Analysis Antamina and Escondida measure the socio-economic
contribution of mining operations to their host countries |
|
|
Supporting Local Suppliers An important way we support our host communities is
using local suppliers |
|
|
Human Rights Human rights aspects are integrated
across our business, [ILLEGIBLE]
by training in Algeria and Cerrejón |
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 20065
|
|
15 |
Policy in Action Case Studies continued
Health
Our approach to health management is based on controlling employee exposures and reducing
occupational illnesses
Throughout the Company, there are numerous examples of our people developing and implementing
innovative engineering solutions to activities that have high health-risk potential.
Stainless Steel Materials, Kwinana Nickel Refinery, Western Australia
As part of a comprehensive biological monitoring program in our Nickel Wests operations, Kwinana
Nickel Refinery (KNR) undertook a study in 2005 to determine baseline levels of ingested nickel in
employees and contractors. The study is the first of its kind to be conducted in the international
nickel industry.
There are no standards setting safe levels of ingested nickel. Using the best
available knowledge, a conservative protocol was developed for both the general workforce and
pregnant workers, following
research that suggested the possibility of high levels of ingested nickel leading to problems in
female reproduction.
Samples were taken from a large number of employees and contractors over a 14-week period. Results
revealed levels of nickel similar to that of non-occupationally exposed people, providing a level
of assurance that ingested nickel exposures at KNR are not likely to cause reproductive harm.
Carbon Steel Materials, BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance, Queensland, Australia
The coal from our mines is delivered by train to our coal terminal at Hay Point. It is conveyed in
bottom dump wagons, which have floors that open and allow the coal to be dumped into bins below.
During transportation, the coal often becomes moist and some of it settles and sticks to the walls
and floor of the wagons.
Operators at the dumpstations conventionally use jackhammers to vibrate the sides of the wagons,
loosening the sticky coal and allowing it to drop into the bins. The use of jackhammers can give
rise to health and safety issues. A project team addressed this challenge by developing an
innovative machine that vibrates the wagons to loosen the coal. The pioneering technology has
alleviated the health and safety issues and could potentially lead to full automation of the coal
unloading process.
Saftey
Working closely with our contractors to ensure their safety management systems align with those of
BHP Billiton
In addressing our challenge of Fatal Risks, a focus area is contractor safety management. We work
closely with our contractors to ensure their safety management systems align with ours, and that
they incorporate our Fatal Risk Control Protocols, so as to minimise any adverse HSEC consequences
and, where possible, to enhance community development opportunities.
Corporate Global Supply
BHP Billiton and Caterpillar formed a strategic alliance in 2003 that has enabled our two companies
to work towards common sustainability goals. The Alliance is investing in opportunities to better
understand technologies that could address the long-term needs of our Company and other users of
Caterpillar machinery through an integrated research and development program. Key areas of focus
include safe access and egress for operators, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing
fatigue management technologies.
Petroleum, Worldwide Drilling Group, Texas, US
In 2005, GlobalSantaFe, our drilling contractor in the region, and its ultra deepwater drillship,
the CR Luigs, received the 2005 Safety Award for Excellence from the US Minerals Management Service
of the US Department of the Interior, the primary regulator of the industry. Key to the excellent
safety performance has been our concerted effort to work as a team, setting out to achieve Zero
Harm to people and the environment and to outperform the industry in drilling efficiency.
Aluminium, Mozal, Mozambique
Our southern African aluminium smelters have developed a strategic framework designed to firstly,
ensure that all contractors are aware of their contribution to the overall health, safety ad
environmental performance on site and, secondly, facilitate the sharing of learnings and completion
of projects. The strategic framework is divided into two risk profiles (Risk Profiling and Risk
Management) and has five basic components: pre-qualification; tender and award selection; access
and activation; execution and control; and performance management.
|
|
|
16
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Environment
Biodiversity loss due to competing land use is an issue of global concern, and one of our key
sustainability challenges
We are committed to actively enhancing our contribution to biodiversity protection. A number of our
sites operate in or near areas recognised as having high biodiversity values, underscoring the
importance of biodiversity conservation. The majority of our sites have biodiversity considerations
embedded in their overall environmental management system and many are actively engaged in
biodiversity-related programs, often partnering with academia and research institutes to improve
biodiversity outcomes.
Base Metals, Olympic Dam, South Australia
Located near our Olympic Dam mine, we initiated Arid Recovery, which is the largest fenced reserve
in Australia from which all feral cats, foxes and rabbits have been removed. The reserve straddles
the mine lease and four other pastoral properties, two of which are leased by the Company. Native
animals and plants thrive within the 86-square-kilometre enclave, which has become both a centre
for ecological research and the site of a nationally significant conservation program.
Aluminium, Bakhuis Concession Area, Suriname
As part of an exploration program in western Suriname, a camera trapping program was established in
conjunction with Conservation International, an international not-for-profit organisation focused
on conserving biodiversity, to record the diverse and abundant fauna of the concession area. Such a
project provides a sound basis for the prediction of potential impacts of any future mining at
Bakhuis, together with the responsible management of those operations.
Stainless Steel Materials, Nickel West, Western Australia
Nickel West is a major pastoral landowner facing many challenges. With the support of Western
Australias Curtin University of Technology and the Centre for the Management of Arid Environments,
we have established Ecosystem Management Understanding (EMU) projects for our pastoral holdings,
designed to help us understand the complexity and inter-connectedness of rangeland biodiversity and
adopt a sustainable approach to the environments in which we operate.
Community
Where host communities are prone to natural disasters, we help them with both disaster planning and
relief
When natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and drought strike, the impact on
our operations, employees and their families, and our host communities can be dire. Through our
community development programs, we help with both disaster planning and relief programs. Our
employees also assist through donations, volunteer work and fundraising, the value of which is
matched by the Company through our Matched Giving Program.
Base Metals, Cerro Colorado, Chile
In June 2005 an earthquake struck Chile in the vicinity of our Cerro Colorado mine, killing eleven
and affecting thousands. In the months following, the Company and different groups of our employees
and contractors played an active part in the recovery process and development of a Plan for the
Reconstruction of Tarapaca, an initiative of the national government.
Petroleum, Operations and Technology Team, US
Before the onset of the US hurricane season in 2005, we partnered in an aid project to collect,
sort and distribute food and supplies, and support emergency shelters set up for evacuees.
Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, our employees contributed hundreds of hours in relief
efforts. Every contribution was needed as the 2005 hurricane season was the worst on record.
Petroleum, Zamzama Gas Project, Pakistan
The United Nations declared the October 2005 Pakistan earthquake to be the worst in recent history.
We joined with the Government of Pakistan and various NGOs to support relief efforts. With the help
of local and worldwide staff, our donations reached more than US$600,000 for urgent humanitarian
programs, the reconstruction of houses, medical supplies and mobile medical units.
Petroleum, Angostura Integrated Oil and Gas Development, Trinidad and Tobago
As Tobago has been the victim of a number of natural disasters in recent years, we partnered with
the Trinidad and Tobago Office of Disaster Preparedness and Management to provide basic cardiac
life support training programs to various primary care institutions to ensure that they are
equipped to assist in the preservation of human life.
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 20065
|
|
17 |
Policy in Action Case Studies continued
Socio-Economic
Measuring the socio-economic contribution of mining operations to their host countries
Our Antamina mine in Peru and Escondida mine in Chile participated in a major study by the
International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) to understand how large-scale mining activity can
impact the socio-economic development of host countries. In both cases, there is evidence that the
mining operations have contributed to economic and social improvements and their efforts provide
lessons on how to promote better socio-economic outcomes in natural resource development projects.
Natural resource endowments have contributed to broad-based and long-term socio-economic
development in some countries, but the degree of development is not consistent across those
countries. The ICMM study sought to understand why some countries have been able to avoid problems
and how the dynamic forces that created good outcomes can be repeated.
A summary of the contribution of the two mines to employment and procurement and the contribution
of the mining sector to national gross domestic product (GDP) and exports is presented in Table 1.
Though modern industrial mining is highly mechanised, the numbers of people employed (either
directly or indirectly) are substantial. Another striking employment characteristic is the
generally low number of expatriate staff. At Antamina, the number of expatriate staff halved in the
five years to 2005; 92 per cent of the staff come from the local region. At both mines, the value
of the procurement of goods and services is substantial, as is the proportion that is sourced
domestically.
Both mines have adopted social investment policies and have invested in a range of social and
economic
infrastructure initiatives. Escondida stated its commitment to a sustainable development framework
from the outset and this has been reflected in various social investments in line with strategic
priorities.
The ICMM analysis of the overall social and economic impacts of the mines shows that the GDP per
capita of Region II, where Escondida is located, is more than twice the national average. The
region also has the lowest poverty rates in Chile and the highest poverty alleviation rates
(1990-2003). There is significant local procurement, resulting from deliberate targeting and
fostering of suppliers, combined with efforts to build their capacities through a collaborative
training and development process. Escondida has invested in human and social capital within Region
II via a Foundation, with increasing emphasis on partnering with stakeholders to underpin the
sustainability of social infrastructure. Additionally, the Company has developed in Antofagasta a
training centre for the industrial and mining sectors.
From Antaminas perspective, the Company has invested in enhancements to the social infrastructure
of host
communities in order to underpin their sustainability. It is not yet possible to ascertain whether
mining has improved or undermined the regional human development index relative to the national
average, and the limited size of the economy and young age of the mine mean that it is premature to
assess the status of economic development and diversification definitively. Initiatives that have
been put in place will take time to have an impact.
Social and community impacts of the mines are linked to a number of factors: the direct impacts of
mining on incomes and employment, the mines social investment policies, the strength of local
governance and local institutions, and also to some extent national policies for mining revenue
redistribution and their effect on investments in social infrastructure by regional and local
governments.
The ICMM report concludes with a summary of recommendations, which are reflected in the Chilean and
Peruvian experiences at Escondida and Antamina, and include:
|
|
extending conventional commercial risk analysis to take account of perceived
weaknesses in the capacity of governments at different levels to undertake economic
development planning and management |
|
|
building a sustainable domestic supply chain through procurement policies and
activities that focus on building the capacity of local suppliers |
|
|
implementing community development principles that focus on reducing poverty in host
communities and underpinning their sustainability. |
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment and other contributions |
|
Escondida |
|
|
Antamina |
|
(highlights) |
|
(Chile) |
|
|
(Peru) |
|
(Data is from the latest year available) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employment |
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
Indirect employment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Includes permanent contract employees located at the mines) |
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
Estimated induced employment |
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
5,815-8,810 |
|
|
Expatriate/Domestic employment |
|
|
1%/99 |
% |
|
|
1%/99 |
% |
|
Procurement |
|
US$ |
540 m |
|
|
US$ |
265 m |
|
|
Domestic procurement |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
Contribution to domestic tax revenue |
|
US$ |
896 |
m |
|
US$ |
319 m |
|
|
National mining sector contributions to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP |
|
|
8.0 |
%1 |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
Exports |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
1. |
|
According to some estimates, the mining sector in Chile would represent more than 13%
of the national GDP if indirect impact is considered (Ramos, Diaro Financiero, 2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
5BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006 |
Our Resources at Work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamonds and Specialty |
|
|
|
|
Sector Group |
Petroleum |
Aluminium |
|
Base Metals |
|
Carbon Steel Materials |
|
Products |
|
Energy Coal |
|
Stainless Steel Materials |
|
|
OIL AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TITANIUM |
|
THERMAL |
|
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
NATURAL GAS |
|
ALUMINIUM |
|
COPPER |
|
GOLD |
|
LEAD |
|
SILVER |
|
URANIUM* |
|
ZINC |
|
MANGANESE |
|
IRON ORE |
|
COKING COAL |
|
DIAMONDS |
|
|
|
COAL |
|
NICKEL |
|
COBALT |
|
|
Fuel, heating,
electricity
generation
|
|
High-tension
power lines,
wires and cables
|
|
Wire and cables,
electrical wiring
in buildings,
electrical
generators and
motors
|
|
|
|
Lead-acid
storage
batteries
(car batteries),
remote area
power storage
|
|
|
|
Electricity
generation
|
|
Zinc carbon
batteries
|
|
Dry cell
batteries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity
generation,
heating
|
|
Electricity
generation
turbines,
batteries
|
|
Rechargeable
lithium batteries
for mobile
telephones
and laptop
computers,
jet engine
turbines |
|
|
Carpets, paints,
plastics
|
|
Door and
window frames,
wall cladding,
roofing, awnings
|
|
Electrical wiring,
plumbing pipes
and tanks,
roofing, light
fixtures,
treated timbers
|
|
Gold leaf for
decoration
|
|
Roofing,
plumbing,
soundproofing,
stained glass
windows
|
|
Solder
|
|
|
|
Roofing, fences,
doors, handles,
paints,
plumbing, nuts
and bolts
|
|
|
|
Steelmaking,
buildings,
bridges, tools,
cranes
|
|
|
|
Diamond grit
and powder
impregnated
rock drilling
bits, masonry
drilling, machine
tool tips and
cutting discs
|
|
Pigment for
paints, fabric,
plastics, paper
|
|
|
|
Street furniture,
building
cladding,
stainless steel
|
|
Tyre adhesives,
magnets,
carbide cutting
tools |
|
|
Electricity
generation,
transport,
furnace fuel
|
|
Propellers, body
sheet (for ships,
aeroplanes,
vehicles),
gearboxes,
motor parts,
wires, cables,
packaging
|
|
Wires and
cables,
electrical wiring
in buildings
and vehicles,
robotics,
airconditioning
and
refrigeration
units, scientific
instruments
|
|
Electronics
for computers,
industrial
equipment,
aerospace
technology,
tinted-glass
windows
|
|
Lead foil,
radiation
shields, toxic
waste storage
containers,
dyes, solder
|
|
Photographic
paper and film,
medicines,
super
conductors
|
|
Electricity
generation
|
|
Galvanising
and corrosion
protection,
car bodies,
carburettors,
tyres
|
|
Steel alloys
|
|
Steelmaking,
transport
equipment,
motor vehicles,
farm machinery
|
|
Steelmaking
|
|
Polishing
compounds
for fine optical
surfaces, jewel
bearings, wire
drawing dies
|
|
Titanium metal
for aerospace
equipment,
engines,
abrasives,
ceramics,
robotics
|
|
Electricity
generation,
heating, cement
|
|
Computer hard
disks, surgical
implements
and implants,
jet engines,
food and
beverage
equipment,
pharmaceutical
equipment,
vehicles, metal
|
|
Paints, enamels,
glazes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hardening |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plastic
components,
packaging
|
|
Components
for TV sets,
radios,
refrigerators
and
airconditioners
|
|
Electrical
appliances,
telephone
cables,
microwave
equipment,
radio and TV
sets
|
|
Electronic
technology
|
|
Electronic
and electrical
appliances such
as radios and TV
sets (soldered
connections)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Door handles
and other
household
components,
brass fittings
|
|
|
|
Refrigerators,
washing
machines,
ovens
|
|
|
|
Knife
sharpeners
|
|
Paper products,
computer and
TV screens
|
|
|
|
Colour TV tubes,
kitchen sinks,
white goods
|
|
Videotape
coatings,
heating
elements on
electric stoves |
|
|
Electricity, fuel
for vehicles,
fuel for cooking
and heating,
clothing fabric,
plastic toys,
pens
|
|
Beverage cans,
bottle tops, foil
wrap, foil semi-
rigid containers,
kettles and
saucepans,
cutlery, tennis
racquets, softball
bats, indoor
and outdoor
furniture,
bicycles, vehicles
|
|
Ornaments,
telephones,
cooking
utensils, home
heating
systems,
decorative
applications,
coins
|
|
Jewellery,
watches,
currency,
dentistry,
decoration
for dinnerware
and ornaments
|
|
Computers,
leadlight
windows,
glass in TV
and computer
screens for
radiation
protection
|
|
Jewellery,
watches,
dinnerware
and ornaments,
mirrors, cutlery,
currency,
medallions
|
|
Electricity |
|
Medications,
zinc cream,
TV sets,
computer
parts, toys
|
|
Glass,
ceramics, dry
cell batteries
|
|
Food cans,
vehicles,
tools, cutlery,
jewellery,
watches
|
|
|
|
Jewellery
|
|
Cosmetics and
sunscreens,
fabric, clothing,
jewellery, heart
pacemakers, hip
replacements,
food colouring
|
|
Electricity, fuel
for cooking and
heating
|
|
Kitchen utensils,
coins, mobile
telephones,
bathroom and
kitchen fittings
and fixtures |
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
|
Safeguards are in place to ensure that uranium produced by our Olympic Dam operation
is used only for power generation in countries that are signatories to the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty and have bilateral agreements with the Australian Government. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 20065 |
|
19
|
Offices
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Location |
1
|
|
Australia
|
|
Adelaide s |
2
|
|
Australia
|
|
Brisbane 5 |
3
|
|
Australia
|
|
Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
(Global Headquarters) s 5 |
4
|
|
Australia
|
|
Newcastle§ |
5
|
|
Australia
|
|
Perth s 5§ |
6
|
|
Belgium
|
|
Antwerp |
7
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Rio de Janeiro 5 |
8
|
|
Canada
|
|
Vancouver 5 |
9
|
|
Chile
|
|
Santiago s 5 |
10
|
|
China
|
|
Beijing 5 |
11
|
|
China
|
|
Shanghai |
12
|
|
Germany
|
|
Essen |
13
|
|
India
|
|
New Delhi 5 |
14
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
Jakarta |
15
|
|
Japan
|
|
Tokyo |
16
|
|
Korea
|
|
Seoul |
17
|
|
Mongolia
|
|
Ulaanbaatar 5 |
18
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
The Hague |
19
|
|
Peru
|
|
Lima 5 |
20
|
|
Russia
|
|
Moscow 5 |
21
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Singapore |
22
|
|
South Africa
|
|
Johannesburg s 5§ |
23
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
Baar |
24
|
|
UK
|
|
London s |
25
|
|
UK
|
|
Sheffield |
26
|
|
US
|
|
Houston s |
27
|
|
US
|
|
Pittsburgh |
s Corporate Centres
Marketing Offices
5 Minerals Exploration Offices
§ Technology Centres
Petroleum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
28
|
|
Algeria
|
|
Ohanet
|
|
Joint operator with Sonatrach
of wet gas development
|
|
|
45 |
% |
29
|
|
Algeria
|
|
ROD Integrated
Development
|
|
Onshore oil development
|
|
|
36.04 |
% |
30
|
|
Australia
|
|
Bass Strait
|
|
The Bass Strait operations produce oil,
condensate, LPG, natural gas and ethane
|
|
|
50 |
% |
31
|
|
Australia
|
|
Griffin
|
|
Operator of oil and gas project offshore WA
|
|
|
45 |
% |
32
|
|
Australia
|
|
Minerva
|
|
Operator of Minerva gas field
development in the Otway Basin
|
|
|
90 |
% |
33
|
|
Australia
|
|
North West Shelf
|
|
One of Australias largest
resource projects, producing
liquids, LNG and domestic gas
|
|
|
8.33-16.67 |
% |
34
|
|
Pakistan
|
|
Zamzama
|
|
Operator of onshore gas development
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
35
|
|
Trinidad
and Tobago
|
|
Angostura
|
|
Operator of oil field
|
|
|
45 |
% |
36
|
|
UK
|
|
Bruce/Keith
|
|
Oil and gas production in the
UK North Sea (sold in August 2006)
|
|
|
16-31.83 |
% |
37
|
|
UK
|
|
Liverpool Bay
|
|
Operator of oil and gas development
in the Irish Sea
|
|
|
46.1 |
% |
38
|
|
US
|
|
Gulf of Mexico
|
|
Interests in several producing assets,
the Atlantis, Neptune and Shenzi
developments, and a significant
exploration acreage position
|
|
|
4.95-100 |
% |
-
|
|
Various
|
|
Exploration
|
|
Exploration interests in Algeria, Australia,
Brunei, Maritime Canada, Colombia, Namibia,
Pakistan, South Africa, Trinidad and
Tobago, UK, US
|
|
|
Aluminium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
|
39 |
|
Australia |
|
Worsley |
|
Integrated alumina refinery/ |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bauxite mine |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Brazil |
|
Alumar |
|
Alumina refinery and aluminium |
|
|
36-40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
smelter |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Brazil |
|
MRN |
|
Bauxite mine |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
42 |
|
Mozambique |
|
Mozal |
|
Aluminium smelter |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
43 |
|
South Africa |
|
Hillside/Bayside |
|
Two aluminium smelters |
|
|
100 |
% |
44 |
|
Suriname |
|
Paranam |
|
Alumina refinery and bauxite mines |
|
|
45 |
% |
Base Metals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
45
|
|
Australia
|
|
Cannington
|
|
Silver, lead and zinc mine in
north-west Queensland
|
|
|
100 |
% |
46
|
|
Australia
|
|
Olympic Dam
|
|
Large underground copper/uranium
mine in South Australia
|
|
|
100 |
% |
47
|
|
Chile
|
|
Cerro Colorado
|
|
Copper mine in northern Chile,
producing cathode copper through
a SX-EW leach operation
|
|
|
100 |
% |
48
|
|
Chile
|
|
Escondida
|
|
The worlds largest copper
mine, located in northern Chile
|
|
|
57.5 |
% |
49
|
|
Chile
|
|
Spence
|
|
Open cut copper mine under development
|
|
|
100 |
% |
50
|
|
Peru
|
|
Antamina
|
|
Large copper-zinc mine
|
|
|
33.75 |
% |
Carbon
Steel Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
51
|
|
Australia
|
|
GEMCO
|
|
Producer of manganese ore
|
|
|
60 |
% |
52
|
|
Australia
|
|
Illawarra
Coal
|
|
Three underground coal mines
|
|
|
100 |
% |
53
|
|
Australia
|
|
Queensland
Coal
|
|
Worlds largest supplier of
high-quality metallurgical coal for
steel production |
|
|
50-80 |
% |
54
|
|
Australia
|
|
TEMCO
|
|
Producer of manganese alloys ()
|
|
|
60 |
% |
55
|
|
Australia
|
|
WA Iron Ore
|
|
Pilbara iron ore mine, rail and port
operations
|
|
|
85100 |
% |
56
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Samarco
|
|
An efficient low-cost producer of iron
ore pellets
|
|
|
50 |
% |
57
|
|
South Africa
|
|
Samancor
Manganese
|
|
Integrated producer of manganese ore
(Hotazel Manganese Mines) and alloys
(Metalloys)
|
|
|
60 |
% |
Diamonds
and Specialty Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
58
|
|
Canada
|
|
Yellowknife
|
|
EKATI Diamond Mine in the
Northwest Territories of Canada
|
|
|
80 |
% |
59
|
|
Mozambique
|
|
Corridor Sands
|
|
Titanium minerals project
|
|
|
90 |
% |
60
|
|
South Africa
|
|
Richards Bay
Minerals
|
|
Worlds largest producer of
titanium slag |
|
|
50% |
|
Energy Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
|
61 |
|
Australia |
|
Hunter Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Coal |
|
Mt Arthur Coal |
|
|
100 |
% |
62 |
|
Australia |
|
Illawarra Coal |
|
Marketing agent for energy coal output |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Australia |
|
Queensland Coal |
|
Marketing agent for energy coal output |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Colombia |
|
Cerrejon |
|
Largest coal producer in Colombia |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
65 |
|
South Africa |
|
Ingwe |
|
Largest coal producer in South Africa |
|
|
100 |
% |
66 |
|
US |
|
New Mexico |
|
Mine-mouth operations |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stainless Steel Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref |
|
Country |
|
Site/Asset |
|
Description |
|
Ownership |
|
67 |
|
Australia |
|
Nickel West |
|
Nickel assets including Mt Keith and |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leinster operations, Kalgoorlie nickel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smelter and concentrator and Kwinana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nickel refinery |
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
Australia |
|
QNI Yabulu |
|
The Yabulu refinery is one of the worlds |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Refinery |
|
major laterite nickel cobalt processing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plants |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Australia |
|
Ravensthorpe |
|
Ravensthorpe nickel mine and processing |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Nickel Project |
|
facility (currently in development) |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Colombia |
|
Cerro Matoso |
|
Integrated ferronickel mining and |
|
|
99.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
smelting complex in north Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 BHP BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY REPORT 2006
|
|
20 |
Recognition
BHP Billiton Employee HSEC Awards
The BHP Billiton Employee HSEC Awards encourage and recognise employees and their teams who openly
embody the values expressed in our Charter and go beyond their day-to-day job requirements to care
for fellow employees, the community and the environment.
Individual Excellence Award Short-listed Nominees
To be personally selected by the Chair of the Judging Panel, The Rt Hon Sir Ninian Stephen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jannie Kleynsmith
|
|
Rossana Espinoza
|
|
Terry Fletcher
|
|
Eduardo Lara
|
|
Tarique MacDonald-Razvi
|
|
Trefor Penno |
Aluminium, Bayside
|
|
Base Metals, Cerro
|
|
Base Metals, Ambrosia
|
|
Base Metals, Cerro
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials,
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, |
Aluminium Smelter,
|
|
Colorado, Chile
|
|
Lake, New Mexico, USA
|
|
Colorado, Chile
|
|
Western Australia Iron Ore
|
|
Western Australia Iron Ore |
South Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Perkins
|
|
Barry Quiroz
|
|
Aubrey Matuludi
|
|
Jim Trench
|
|
Muliawan Margadana |
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials,
|
|
Minerals Exploration,
|
|
Energy Coal, Ingwe,
|
|
Petroleum Products
|
|
BHP Billiton Indonesia, |
|
|
BHP Billiton Mitsubishi
|
|
East Asia, Beijing, China
|
|
Middelburg Mine,
|
|
Marketing, Supply &
|
|
Jakarta Office, Indonesia |
|
|
Alliance, Peak Downs
|
|
|
|
South Africa
|
|
Trading, Singapore |
|
|
|
|
Mine, Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award Finalists (all finalists are team representatives)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health
|
|
Safety
|
|
Environment
|
|
Community |
Fatigue Management (Tony OKeefe)
|
|
Six Sigma Visibility Project
|
|
San Manuel Mine Reclamation Project
|
|
Drought Relief Program |
Carbon Steel Materials,
|
|
(John Mitchell)
|
|
(John Kline)
|
|
(Salvador Traquino) |
Western Australia Iron Ore
|
|
Energy Coal, Mt Arthur Coal,
|
|
Base Metals, San Manuel Mine, USA
|
|
Aluminium, Mozal, Mozambique |
Reducing Dust and Noise
|
|
Hunter Valley, Australia
|
|
Miami Unit No 2 Tailings Site
|
|
Mozlink II (Frans-Jozef Jaspers) |
Generation during Metal Ladle
|
|
Behaviour Based Competence Model
|
|
Reclamation (David Unger)
|
|
Aluminium, Mozal, Mozambique |
Lifting Beam Testing (Ramiro Roy)
|
|
(Ramón Parrguez)
|
|
Base Metals, Pinto Valley Operation,
|
|
Groote Eylandt Liquor Management |
Aluminium, Mozal, Mozambique
|
|
Base Metals, Escondida,
|
|
USA
|
|
Plan (Rick Peters) |
Bird Flu Pandemic Preparedness
|
|
Second Region, Chile
|
|
Punta Negra Salt Lake
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, GEMCO, |
Project (Yusdi Sangadji)
|
|
Reducing Road Transport Risks
|
|
Biodiversity Monitoring Plan
|
|
Australia |
Jakarta Office, Indonesia
|
|
(John Christowitz)
|
|
(Nora Patricia González Jorquera) |
|
|
Nickel Hygiene Baseline Study
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Skills Development |
|
|
Aluminium, Mozal, Mozambique
|
|
Base Metals, Escondida, Chile
|
|
Program (Ralph Chelotti) |
(Iona Williamson)
|
|
Zero Incident Process (Nicole Sabourin)
|
|
Arid Recovery (John Read)
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, Samarco |
Stainless Steel Materials, Kwinana
|
|
Diamonds and Specialty Products,
|
|
Base Metals, Olympic Dam, Australia
|
|
Mineração S.A., Brazil |
Nickel Refinery, Australia
|
|
EKATI Diamond Mine, Canada
|
|
Shenzi Subsea Architecture
|
|
Community Relocation Project |
Hallmark Nickel Prospect Community
|
|
Eliminating High Risk Activities in
|
|
Optimisation (David Trench)
|
|
(Luis Alberto Ponguta) |
and Health Development Project
|
|
Drilling Operations (Dale Bradford)
|
|
Petroleum, Shenzi Development,
|
|
Stainless Steel Materials, |
(Carlito Rena)
|
|
Petroleum, Worldwide Drilling Team,
|
|
Gulf of Mexico, USA
|
|
Cerro Matoso, Colombia |
Minerals Exploration, Region XI,
|
|
Houston, USA
|
|
Tank Cleaning System (Patrick Fee)
|
|
Livestock Training Program |
Philippines
|
|
Contractors Safety Awareness Program
|
|
Petroleum, Fourchon Shore Base, USA
|
|
(Sheldon Narine) |
Improving Ergonomic Conditions at
|
|
(Muhammad Aftab Khan)
|
|
Ore Moisture Conditioning Project
|
|
Petroleum, Angostura Oil and |
Horizontal Direct Chilled Casting
|
|
Petroleum, Pakistan Asset, Islamabad,
|
|
(John Groves)
|
|
Gas,Trinidad and Tobago |
Machine (Sebastião Rodrigues)
|
|
Pakistan
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, WA Iron Ore,
|
|
Community Sanitation Program |
Aluminium, Valesul Alumínio S.A.,
|
|
Measuring Contractor Performance
|
|
Australia
|
|
(Humera Malik) |
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
|
|
(Johan Badenhorst)
|
|
Reusing Town Treated Effluent
|
|
Petroleum, Zamzama Asset, Pakistan |
Digital Noise Display Board
|
|
Energy Coal, Ingwe, Middelburg Mine,
|
|
Program (Carl Bagnall)
|
|
Fish Farming Development Program |
(Mariaan Smit)
|
|
South Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Coal, Mt Arthur Coal,
|
|
(José Haroldo Chaves Paulo) |
Energy Coal, Ingwe, Khutala Colliery, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BMA Haul Road Watering Project
|
|
Hunter Valley, Australia
|
|
Aluminium, Mineração Rio do Norte, |
Mpumalanga, South Africa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Ross Truelson)
|
|
Brazil Nut Germplasm Bank
|
|
Brazil |
Risk Based Medical Assessments
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, BHP Billiton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Ademar Cavalcanti Silvi)
|
|
Tintaya Foundation (Alfredo Zuniga) |
(Samantha Lee)
|
|
Mitsubishi Alliance, Peak Downs Mine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminium, Mineração Rio do Norte,
|
|
Base Metals, Tintaya, Peru |
Petroleum, Australia Operated
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Valesul Volunteer Program |
Asset Team, Griffin Venture, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Australia
|
|
Dozer Training Package (Edan Stolberg)
|
|
Coal Fine Reuse as Secondary Fuel
|
|
(Victor Ladeira) |
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, BHP Billiton
|
|
(Emanoel Varão)
|
|
Aluminium, Valesul Alumínio S.A., |
Fatigue and Sleep Control
(Horatio Reeves)
|
|
Mitsubishi Alliance, Australia
|
|
Aluminium, Alumar, Brazil
|
|
Brazil |
Base Metals, Antamina, Peru
|
|
HSEC Contacts Process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Anthony Peterson) |
|
|
|
|
Fatigue Management in Coal Mining
Program (Garry Hughes)
|
|
Carbon Steel Materials, BHP Billiton
Mitsubishi Alliance, Goonyella Riverside
|
|
|
|
The excellence, highly commended
and merit award recipients will be listed in our Full Sustainability Report
following their announcement at the
Awards presentation to take place on
12 September 2006. |
Carbon Steel Materials, BHP Billiton
Mitsubishi Alliance, Peak Downs Mine,
Australia
|
|
Mine, Australia
|
|
|
|
BHP
BILLITON SUSTAINABILITY SUMMARY 2006
About BHP Billiton
BHP Billiton is the worlds largest diversified resources company, with a portfolio of
high-quality, long-life assets and a significant pipeline of growth projects. We have around 38,000
employees working in more than 100 operations and offices in 25 countries (see our BHP Billiton
locations map).
The headquarters of BHP Billiton Limited, and the global headquarters of the
combined BHP Billiton Group, are located in Melbourne, Australia. BHP Billiton Plc is located in
London, United Kingdom. The Group has primary listings on the Australian and London Stock
Exchanges.
We have adopted a business model based on customer-oriented groupings called Customer Sector Groups
(CSGs). This structure reflects our focus on the needs of our customers.
Each CSG is a substantial business in its own right, and several are leaders in their respective
fields. They have autonomy to optimise their businesses, with clear accountabilities. The CSGs are
Aluminium, Base Metals, Carbon Steel Materials (includes Metallurgical Coal, Iron Ore and
Manganese), Diamonds and Specialty Products, Energy Coal, Petroleum, and Stainless Steel Materials.
Our key
markets include downstream refiners and processors of raw materials, such as steelworks, smelters,
petroleum refiners, power stations and diamond cutters.
Last year we welcomed WMC Resources Ltd to the Group and this year commenced reporting on the
activities of former WMC assets.
In line with the values expressed in our Charter, throughout our operations we have an overriding
commitment to health, safety, environmental responsibility and sustainable development.