PREC14A
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION,
DATED SEPTEMBER , 2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant þ
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential, For Use
of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy
Statement
o Definitive Additional
Materials
o Soliciting Materials
Pursuant to
Section 240.14a-12
ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.
(Name of Registrant as Specified
in its Charter)
ATS INC.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11
|
|
|
|
|
1.)
|
Title of each class of securities to which the transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
2.)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
3.)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
4.)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
1.)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
2.)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
SEPTEMBER , 2006
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE STOCKHOLDERS
OF
ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER [ ],
2006
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
ATS INC.
a wholly owned subsidiary of
WOODSIDE PETROLEUM
LTD.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED MERGER
OF
ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD. AND STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card are
furnished by ATS Inc., a Delaware corporation (ATS)
and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Woodside Petroleum
Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of Victoria,
Australia (Woodside), in connection with its
solicitation of proxies to be used at a special meeting (the
Special Meeting) of stockholders of Energy Partners,
Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the Company), to be
held on October [ ], 2006, at Hotel
InterContinental New Orleans, 444 St. Charles Avenue, New
Orleans, Louisiana 70130, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time,
and at any adjournments, postponements or reschedulings thereof.
Pursuant to this Proxy Statement, ATS is soliciting proxies from
holders of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of the Company (the Shares) to vote
AGAINST (i) the proposal to approve the
issuance of shares of the Companys common stock to
stockholders of Stone Energy Corporation (Stone) in
connection with the proposed merger of Stone with and into EPL
Acquisition Corp. LLC (the Proposed Stone Merger),
as a result of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated June 22, 2006, by and among the
Company, EPL Acquisition Corp. LLC and Stone (the Stone
Merger Agreement) and (ii) two other proposals
proposed by the Company in connection therewith. The Company has
set August 28, 2006 as the record date for determining
those stockholders who will be entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting. The principal executive offices of the Company are
located at 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3400, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70170.
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card are
first being mailed to the Companys stockholders on or
about September [ ], 2006.
On August 31, 2006, ATS commenced a tender offer to
purchase all of the outstanding Shares, at a price of
$23.00 net per Share in cash (less any applicable
withholding taxes and without interest), subject to possible
increase by $0.50 or $1.00 per Share to a total of $23.50
or $24.00 net per Share in cash depending on the resolution
of certain litigation described herein. The terms and conditions
of the tender offer are set forth in the Offer to Purchase,
dated August 31, 2006 (the Offer to Purchase),
and the related Letter of Transmittal (the Letter of
Transmittal and together with the Offer to Purchase and
any amendments or supplements thereto, the Offer),
which were included as exhibits to the Schedule TO filed by
ATS with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) on August 31, 2006.
IF YOU WANT TO PRESERVE YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO ACCEPT THE
SIGNIFICANT PREMIUM FOR YOUR SHARES OFFERED BY ATS, OR
OTHERWISE DO NOT WANT THE COMPANY TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSED STONE
MERGER, VOTE AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER, AND VOTE
AGAINST THE OTHER PROPOSALS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH, BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED [COLOR]
PROXY CARD TODAY.
REJECTION OF THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER BY THE COMPANYS
STOCKHOLDERS WILL SATISFY A CONDITION OF THE OFFER AND IS AN
IMPORTANT STEP IN SECURING THE SUCCESS OF THE OFFER. YOUR VOTE
AGAINST THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER DOES NOT OBLIGATE
YOU TO TENDER YOUR SHARES PURSUANT TO THE OFFER.
EVEN IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SENT A PROXY CARD TO THE COMPANY, YOU
HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE. ONLY YOUR LATEST-DATED
PROXY COUNTS. VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER
BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED [COLOR] PROXY CARD
IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. NO POSTAGE IS NECESSARY
IF YOUR PROXY CARD IS MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. IF YOU SUBMIT
THE COMPANYS [COLOR] CARD, EVEN IF YOU VOTE
AGAINST THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER, THE COMPANY CAN
USE YOUR SHARES TO ESTABLISH A QUORUM AND THEREBY USE ITS
PROXY CARD TO ASSIST THEM IN OBTAINING THE NECESSARY APPROVAL OF
THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER. THEREFORE, WE URGE YOU TO SIGN, DATE
AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED [COLOR] PROXY CARD TO US.
OUR GOAL IS TO DEFEAT THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER. THERE ARE TWO
WAYS TO DO SO. IF WE OBTAIN A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF VOTES
AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES TO STONE STOCKHOLDERS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER TO CLEARLY DEFEAT
THE PROPOSAL, WE WILL VOTE YOUR SHARES. HOWEVER, THERE ARE
CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO DEFEAT THE
PROPOSAL BY WITHHOLDING PROXIES AND DENYING THE COMPANY A QUORUM
(FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED HEREIN). ATS WOULD LIKE, IS
REQUESTING, AND BY SIGNING THE [COLOR] PROXY CARD THE
STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE GRANTING TO ATS THE FLEXIBILITY TO EXERCISE
THAT OPTION IN THE EVENT THAT ATS DETERMINES IN GOOD FAITH THAT
DOING SO MAY BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE MEANS TO DEFEAT THE PROPOSED
STONE MERGER. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THIS CONDITION
TO YOUR PROXY, SEE VOTING PROCEDURES BELOW.
THIS PROXY STATEMENT RELATES TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IN
OPPOSITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES AS WELL AS THE OTHER
PROPOSALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER AND
IS NOT A REQUEST FOR THE TENDER OF SHARES OF THE
COMPANYS COMMON STOCK NOR AN OFFER WITH RESPECT THERETO.
THE OFFER IS BEING MADE ONLY BY MEANS OF THE OFFER TO PURCHASE
AND THE RELATED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, WHICH HAVE BEEN
SEPARATELY MAILED TO YOU. BEFORE MAKING ANY DECISION REGARDING
THE OFFER, YOU SHOULD READ THE OFFER TO PURCHASE, WHICH SETS
FORTH IN DETAIL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER. THE
DISCUSSION OF THE OFFER HEREIN IS A SUMMARY ONLY AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY THE OFFER TO PURCHASE AND THE
RELATED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. YOU SHOULD REFER TO THE OFFER TO
PURCHASE AND THE RELATED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FOR THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF THE OFFER.
REASONS
TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER
ATS is soliciting proxies from the Companys stockholders
in opposition to the Proposed Stone Merger and specifically
AGAINST the proposals related thereto. ATS urges all
of the Companys stockholders to vote AGAINST
the proposed issuance of Shares in connection with the Proposed
Stone Merger for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the proposals concerning the
Proposed Stone Merger allows you to receive significantly
greater value for your Shares.
|
ATS believes that the Offer is far superior to the Proposed
Stone Merger because it provides the Companys stockholders
an opportunity to realize an immediate premium for their Shares
rather than paying a premium to Stone stockholders.
2
ATSs offer price of $23.00 net per Share represents a
premium above the $18.40 closing price of the Companys
common stock as of August 25, 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
1 day
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
30 calendar day average
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
60 calendar day average
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
90 calendar day average
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
If one of the $0.50 increases to the offer price is made and the
offer price is increased to $23.50 net per Share, this
increased offer would represent a premium above the $18.40
closing price of the Companys common stock as of
August 25, 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
1 day
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
30 calendar day average
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
60 calendar day average
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
90 calendar day average
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
If both $0.50 increases to the offer price are made and the
offer price is increased to $24.00 net per Share, this
increased offer would represent a premium above the $18.40
closing price of the Companys common stock as of
August 25, 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
1 day
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
30 calendar day average
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
60 calendar day average
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
90 calendar day average
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Information with respect to the range of closing sale prices for
the Shares for certain dates and periods is set forth in the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus on
Form S-4
filed by the Company with the Commission on July 21, 2006,
as amended (the Company
Form S-4),
and in lesser detail in the Offer to Purchase.
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the proposals concerning the
Proposed Stone Merger is a vote against the creation of a highly
leveraged company.
|
If the Proposed Stone Merger is completed, the resulting company
will be significantly more leveraged and such leverage will
decrease its financial and operating flexibility. There is no
guaranty that the Companys management will be able to
capture the synergies it expects to be realized in the Proposed
Stone Merger or that any such synergies will materially increase
the Companys value.
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the proposals concerning the
Proposed Stone Merger sends a strong message to the Board of
Directors of the Company (the Companys Board)
that you want to preserve your opportunity to accept the Offer,
which has significantly greater financial value than the
Proposed Stone Merger.
|
The Offer is subject to a number of other conditions (which are
described in Section 14 of the Offer to Purchase and some
of which are summarized in CONDITIONS TO THE OFFER
below). Certain of these conditions require action by the
Companys Board. By voting against the issuance of Shares
to Stones stockholders as a result of the Proposed Stone
Merger, the Companys stockholders can demonstrate their
support for the Offer and send a message to the Companys
Board that it should take all actions necessary to permit the
Offer to proceed.
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the proposals concerning the
Proposed Stone Merger will help satisfy one of the conditions of
the Offer.
|
One condition of the Offer (as described below under
CONDITIONS TO THE OFFER) is that the Stone Merger
Agreement has been validly terminated. Accordingly, the
Companys stockholders should reject the proposals
concerning the Proposed Stone Merger, including the proposal to
approve the issuance of Shares to Stones stockholders as a
result of the Proposed Stone Merger. A vote AGAINST
these proposals moves all of the Companys stockholders
closer to being able to benefit from the Offer.
3
Failure to vote AGAINST the issuance of Shares to
Stones stockholders in connection with the Proposed Stone
Merger will not prevent you from tendering your Shares in the
Offer nor will voting AGAINST obligate you to tender
your Shares in the Offer. However, a vote AGAINST
the proposal described above will help you preserve your
opportunity to have your Shares purchased in the Offer.
RETURN YOUR [COLOR] PROXY CARD AND VOTE AGAINST THE
PROPOSED STONE MERGER AGREEMENT TODAY.
DO NOT RETURN ANY PROXY CARD YOU RECEIVE FROM THE COMPANY. EVEN
IF YOU PREVIOUSLY HAVE SUBMITTED A PROXY CARD FURNISHED BY THE
COMPANY, IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE BY SIMPLY
SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED [COLOR] PROXY CARD
TODAY. IF YOU SUBMIT THE COMPANYS [COLOR] CARD, EVEN IF
YOU VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER, THE
COMPANY CAN USE YOUR SHARES TO ESTABLISH A QUORUM AND
THEREBY USE THE [COLOR] CARD TO ASSIST THEM IN OBTAINING THE
NECESSARY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER.
WE URGE YOU TO SEND THE COMPANYS DIRECTORS A CLEAR MESSAGE
THAT THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER IS NOT IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS AND
THAT THEY SHOULD TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO REMOVE ALL
OBSTACLES TO THE OFFER.
BACKGROUND
OF THE SOLICITATION
The Company
Form S-4
provides a summary of the events leading to the Company entering
into the Stone Merger Agreement.
On August 28, 2006, Don Voelte, the chief executive officer
of Woodside placed a telephone call to Richard A. Bachmann, the
chief executive officer of the Company. During this call,
Mr. Voelte indicated that ATS intended to make an offer for
the Company at a price of $23.00 per Share in cash, subject
to the Companys stockholders voting against the announced
merger with Stone. Mr. Voelte stated that he also believed
that under the terms of the Stone Merger Agreement, the Company
would not be able to deal with ATS while this agreement was in
force. Mr. Bachmann confirmed that Mr. Voelte was
correct in his belief. Mr. Voelte also indicated that ATS
would file litigation seeking to invalidate both the
$25.6 million termination fee and the $43.5 million
payment previously made by the Company on behalf of Stone, and
that if both these amounts were invalidated and/or repaid ATS
intended to increase its offer to $24.00 per Share in cash.
Mr. Bachmann did not make any further inquiry of
Mr. Voelte. At the end of the discussion, Mr. Voelte
gave Mr. Bachmann his contact information.
Immediately following this telephone call, ATS filed the claims
described below under CERTAIN LITIGATION against the
Company and Stone in the Chancery Court of Delaware and issued a
press release announcing its proposal and stating its intention
to commence an all-cash tender offer at a price of
$23.00 per Share subject to increase under certain
circumstances depending on the resolution of the Delaware
litigation.
On the afternoon of August 28, 2006, the Company issued a
press release requesting that stockholders of the Company take
no action with respect to ATSs proposal at such time. The
release stated that the Companys Board would meet to
review and discuss ATSs proposal and would advise
stockholders of the Companys position in due
course. On August 29, 2006, the Company amended the
Company
Form S-4
(the
S-4
Amendment) to include disclosure regarding the Offer. The
S-4
Amendment also revised the Companys disclosure regarding
the ability of its stockholders to act by written consent by
deleting reference to a provision in its bylaws that purportedly
requires approval of 85% of the Shares outstanding in order for
stockholders to act by written consent. Also on August 29,
2006, the Company sent a letter to its employees advising them
of the current status of the Offer.
On August 31, 2006, ATS commenced its Offer by filing a
Schedule TO with the Commission including the Offer to
Purchase and the accompanying Letter of Transmittal as exhibits.
Also on August 31, 2006, ATS issued a
4
press release announcing the commencement of the Offer and
placed a summary advertisement relating to the Offer in the Wall
Street Journal.
In our Offer to Purchase, we stated our concern that the terms
of the Stone Merger Agreement could be interpreted to prohibit
the Company from negotiating a transaction with, or providing
confidential information to us. On September 7, 2006, the
Company filed an action against Stone in the Delaware Court of
Chancery seeking a declaratory judgment to clarify that the
Stone Merger Agreement does not prohibit the Company from taking
certain actions such as negotiating a transaction with, or
providing confidential information to, a third party. In its
complaint, the Company indicated that Stone believed that the
Stone Merger Agreement prohibits the Company from taking such
actions.
THE
OFFER
The purpose of the Offer is to acquire control of, and
ultimately the entire equity interest in, the Company. If
pursuant to the Offer, ATS accepts for payment and pays for at
least the number of Shares that, when added to Shares already
owned by ATS (and/or Woodside or any of its other subsidiaries),
shall constitute a majority of the then outstanding Shares on a
fully diluted basis, ATS (or another direct or indirect
subsidiary of Woodside) will seek to merge with and into the
Company (the Second-Step Merger). If the Second-Step
Merger occurs, the Company will become an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Woodside and each issued and then outstanding
Share (other than any Shares held in the treasury of the
Company, or owned by Woodside, ATS or any of Woodsides
other subsidiaries and any Shares held by the Companys
stockholders properly seeking appraisal for their Shares) shall
be cancelled and converted automatically into the right to
receive $23.00 per share, in cash (or any greater amount
per Share paid pursuant to the Offer (including any right to
receive, if applicable, any Contractual Right (as defined
herein) to receive an additional amount per Share in connection
with the Delaware litigation described herein)).
On August 28, 2006, ATS commenced litigation in the
Delaware Court of Chancery to invalidate and/or require the
repayment of, as applicable, the excessive termination fees paid
and payable under the Stone Merger Agreement. Upon the terms
described in our Offer to Purchase, if we are successful in our
litigation and succeed in obtaining a final and nonappealable
court order (i) providing for the repayment of the
$43.5 million fee (the Initial Termination Fee)
paid by the Company when it entered into the Stone Merger
Agreement in respect of the
break-up fee
Stone owed to Plains Exploration & Production Company
(Plains) or (ii) invalidating the
$25.6 million fee (the Additional Termination
Fee) which the Company obligated itself to pay to Stone
upon termination of the Stone Merger Agreement, we will increase
our offer price per Share from $23.00 to $23.50. If we are
successful in our litigation with respect to both fees, upon the
terms described in the Offer to Purchase, we will increase our
offer price per Share from $23.00 to $24.00. For a more detailed
discussion of the Delaware litigation, see our Offer to Purchase
and see CERTAIN LITIGATION below.
CONDITIONS
TO THE OFFER
A detailed discussion of the conditions to consummation of the
Offer is provided in Section 14 of the Offer to Purchase.
Before making any decision regarding the Offer, the
Companys stockholders should read the Offer to Purchase,
which sets forth in detail the terms and conditions of the Offer.
THE OFFER IS NOT CONDITIONED ON OUR OBTAINING FINANCING.
The Offer is conditioned upon, among others, the following:
(i) there having been validly tendered and not properly
withdrawn prior to the expiration of the Offer at least that
number of Shares that, when added to the Shares then owned by
ATS (and/or Woodside or any of Woodsides other
subsidiaries), shall constitute a majority of the then
outstanding Shares on a fully diluted basis (including, without
limitation, all Shares issuable upon the exercise of any options
or warrants), (ii) the Stone Merger Agreement having been
terminated on terms satisfactory to ATS, and the Company having
no liability in connection with the Stone Merger Agreement other
than the possible payment of the $25.6 million termination
fee required thereby, (iii) the Companys Board having
approved the Offer and the Second-Step Merger or any other
business combination satisfactory to ATS between the Company and
ATS (and/or any of Woodsides other subsidiaries) pursuant
to the requirements of Section 203 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or ATS being satisfied
that Section 203 does not apply to or
5
otherwise restrict the Offer, the Second-Step Merger or such
other business combination, (iv) (a) the Company
entering into a definitive merger agreement with ATS (and/or any
of Woodsides other subsidiaries) with respect to a merger
of ATS (and/or any of Woodsides other subsidiaries) and
the Company, (b) nominees of ATS constituting a majority of
the Companys Board or (c) there having been validly
tendered and not properly withdrawn prior to the expiration of
the Offer that number of Shares that, when added to the Shares
then owned by Woodside or any of its subsidiaries, shall
constitute at least 90% of the then outstanding Shares on a
fully diluted basis (including, without limitation, all Shares
issuable upon the exercise of any options or warrants) and
(v) any applicable waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the
HSR Act), having expired or been terminated prior to
the expiration of the Offer.
There can be no assurance as to the timing or satisfaction of
the conditions to the Offer. While certain of such conditions
are within the control of the Companys Board, certain of
the conditions are outside of the control of the Companys
Board, such as the termination or expiration of any applicable
waiting periods under the HSR Act. The invalidation of the
Additional Termination Fee and the Initial Termination Fee is
also outside of the control of the Companys Board.
However, ATS intends to pursue its claims regarding the
Additional Termination Fee and the Initial Termination Fee as
expeditiously as possible and to attempt to ensure that further
steps toward consummation of the Proposed Stone Merger are not
taken. See CERTAIN LITIGATION below. By voting
AGAINST the issuance of Shares in connection with
the Proposed Stone Merger, the Companys stockholders can
demonstrate their support for the Offer. A vote
AGAINST the Proposed Stone Merger moves all of the
Companys stockholders closer to being able to benefit from
the Offer.
CERTAIN
LITIGATION
Pursuant to the Stone Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to
advance the $43.5 million Initial Termination Fee to Stone,
and subsequently paid the Initial Termination Fee to Plains on
the date it entered into the Stone Merger Agreement. Under the
Stone Merger Agreement, Stone has committed to repay the Initial
Termination Fee to the Company in only a few very limited
circumstances i.e., if Stone is in material breach
of the Stone Merger Agreement, or in certain situations in which
Stones board of directors or stockholders take action
resulting in the termination of the Stone Merger Agreement.
Thus, the Company will forfeit any recovery of the
$43.5 million Initial Termination Fee if the Companys
Board changes its recommendation about the Stone Merger
Agreement, or if the Companys stockholders fail to approve
the Stone Merger Agreement, thereby enabling the Company to
pursue a more favorable third-party proposal. The Companys
payment of the $43.5 million Initial Termination Fee
therefore is equivalent to a termination fee of
$43.5 million.
In addition, the Company agreed to pay Stone the
$25.6 million Additional Termination Fee if the
Companys Board withdraws or changes its recommendation in
favor of the Stone Merger Agreement, or if the Companys
stockholders do not approve the Proposed Stone Merger (i.e., do
not approve the issuance of Shares to Stone stockholders in
connection with that merger) in response to a third-party
proposal and the Company thereafter within twelve months enters
into such a transaction.
Combined, the provisions in the Stone Merger Agreement
concerning the Initial Termination Fee and the Additional
Termination Fee amount to $69.1 million. The termination
fee is thus worth approximately 10% of the Companys market
capitalization, which was approximately $690,950,987 as of the
close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on June 22,
2006, the date the Company and Stone entered into the Stone
Merger Agreement.
On August 28, 2006, ATS commenced litigation in the
Chancery Court of Delaware concerning, among other things, the
validity of the Initial Termination Fee and the Additional
Termination Fee. In the event that we obtain a judgment on the
merits resulting in a court order either (i) invalidating
the Additional Termination Fee in full (an ATF Favorable
Judgment), and such judgment shall have become final and
nonappealable (an ATF Final Favorable Judgment), or
(ii) requiring the repayment by Stone to the Company of the
Initial Termination Fee in full (an ITF Favorable
Judgment), and such judgment shall have become final and
nonappealable (an ITF Final Favorable Judgment),
then we will increase our offer price by $0.50 per Share to
$23.50 per Share. If we receive both an ATF Final Favorable
Judgment and an ITF Final Favorable Judgment, then we will
increase our offer price by $1.00 per Share to
$24.00 per Share.
6
If, prior to the expiration of the Offer either, or both, of an
ATF Favorable Judgment and an ITF Favorable Judgment shall have
been obtained, but shall not yet have become an ATF Final
Favorable Judgment
and/or an
ITF Final Favorable Judgment, as the case may be, then
stockholders of the Company whose Shares have been accepted for
payment in connection with the Offer shall receive
$23.00 net per Share and a contractual right to receive an
additional $0.50 per Share (each a Contractual
Right) with respect to each of such ATF Final Favorable
Judgment
and/or such
ITF Final Favorable Judgment, as the case may be, to be paid
following the date on which an ATF Final Favorable Judgment or
an ITF Final Favorable Judgment, as the case may be, has been
obtained.
Contractual Rights will not be assignable or transferable except
by operation of law (including the laws of descent and
distribution) or by intestacy without the prior written approval
of ATS, and will not be evidenced by any certificate or other
instrument. Upon any payment of the amount due under a
Contractual Right to the person identified in the appropriate
portion of a Letter of Transmittal, ATSs obligations with
respect thereto will be fully discharged. Each Contractual Right
will represent only the contingent right to receive
$0.50 per Share as described in the Offer to Purchase.
Neither ATS nor Woodside will have any fiduciary, contractual or
other duty to pursue any action with respect to the Delaware
litigation described above and in the Offer to Purchase, and all
decisions with respect to such litigation at anytime will be
made at ATSs discretion.
ATSs litigation in the Chancery Court of Delaware also
included a claim to invalidate a provision of the Companys
bylaws which purports to impose an 85% vote requirement for
consent solicitations. ATS believes this provision is invalid on
its face.
On September 7, 2006, ATS filed a motion for summary
judgment seeking a judgment as a matter of law that the bylaw
provision referenced above is invalid under Delaware law.
CONSENT
SOLICITATION
We currently intend to file a consent statement with the
Commission for use in connection with the solicitation of
written consents from at least a majority of stockholders of the
Company to (i) remove each current member of the
Companys Board and (ii) elect five of our nominees to
serve as directors of the Company. Following such election, we
expect that our nominees would reduce the size of the
Companys Board to five members. ATS reserves the right,
however, at any time to determine not to commence a consent
solicitation (or to terminate any solicitation which has
previously been commenced) if we determine it to be in our best
interests to do so or if we determine that the consent
solicitation is unnecessary, including, if we so determine, if
the Companys Board has (i) recommended against the
issuance of Shares in connection with Proposed Stone Merger,
(ii) recommended that the Companys stockholders
accept our Offer and (iii) not adopted a poison
pill or shareholders rights plan. Details regarding such
consent solicitation, if and when commenced, will be set forth
in a separate consent solicitation statement filed with the
Commission in compliance with the requirements of
Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder (the
Exchange Act).
In connection with the potential consent solicitation described
above, you should know that we have also commenced litigation to
challenge the validity of a provision of the Companys
bylaws, which purports to impose a supermajority requirement on
any actions taken by the written consent of the Companys
stockholders. Specifically, Section 2.9 of the
Companys bylaws provides in pertinent part that
stockholders may only act by written consent if the
greater of (i) the number of stockholders necessary to
authorize the action or (ii) 85% of the total outstanding
shares consent in writing. However, Section 228 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(Section 228) provides that stockholders have a
statutory right to act by majority written consent unless the
certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. The
Companys certificate of incorporation does not impose a
supermajority requirement on the ability of the Companys
stockholders to act by written consent. We believe that we will
be successful on this claim.
On September 7, 2006, ATS filed a motion for summary
judgment seeking a judgment as a matter of law that
Section 2.9 of the Companys bylaws is invalid under
Section 228 and Delaware case law.
THIS PROXY STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SOLICITATION OF
CONSENTS WITH RESPECT TO ANY ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT BY THE
COMPANYS STOCKHOLDERS. ANY
7
CONSENT SOLICITATION (INCLUDING A CONSENT SOLICITATION TO REMOVE
OR APPOINT DIRECTORS) WILL BE MADE ONLY PURSUANT TO SEPARATE
CONSENT SOLICITATION MATERIALS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF SECTION 14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
CERTAIN
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER
At the Special Meeting, the Companys stockholders of
record at the close of business on August 28, 2006 (the
Record Date), will be voting on, among other things,
whether to approve the issuance of Shares to effectuate the
Proposed Stone Merger. According to the Company
Form S-4,
under the terms of the Stone Merger Agreement, Stone common
stock will be acquired for total consideration estimated at
$2.2 billion, including the refinancing of approximately
$800 million of debt. Each outstanding share of Stone
common stock will be converted into the right to receive at the
election of the holder (subject to the limitations described
below): (i) $51.00 in cash, or (ii) Shares equivalent
to the ratio determined by dividing $51.00 by the market price
of the Shares (based on a
20-day
trading average prior to the third trading day preceding the
closing), provided that the exchange ratio will not be greater
than 2.525 or less than 2.066 Shares per Stone share. The
election of cash or stock will be subject to a limit on total
cash consideration of approximately $723 million (which
includes approximately $15.1 million attributable to stock
options) and a limit on the total number of Shares issued of
approximately 35 million. As a result, according to the
Company
Form S-4,
Stone stockholders will end up holding as much as approximately
46% of the combined company, assuming the maximum number of
Shares is issued to Stones stockholders.
Concurrently with its execution of the Stone Merger Agreement,
the Company paid to Plains, on behalf of Stone, the
$43.5 million Initial Termination Fee that was payable by
Stone upon the termination of Stones merger agreement with
Plains. The full amount of such termination fee shall be
reimbursed by Stone to the Company upon termination of the Stone
Merger Agreement in a limited set of circumstances as set forth
in the Company
Form S-4.
IF THE STONE MERGER AGREEMENT IS TERMINATED FOR ANY OTHER
REASON, INCLUDING IF THE COMPANYS BOARD RECOMMENDS
AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES CONTEMPLATED BY
THE STONE MERGER AGREEMENT OR THE COMPANYS STOCKHOLDERS DO
NOT APPROVE SUCH ISSUANCE OF SHARES, THEN THE $43.5 MILLION
INITIAL TERMINATION FEE SHALL NOT BE REPAID IN WHOLE OR IN
PART TO THE COMPANY BY STONE.
The Stone Merger Agreement also provides for the payment by the
Company to Stone of the $26.5 Additional Termination Fee if the
Stone Merger Agreement is terminated in the following
circumstances: (i) by Stone if the Companys Board
withdraws, modifies or changes its recommendation of the merger
agreement or the merger in a manner adverse to Stone in
reference to a third party acquisition proposal or (ii) by
the Company or Stone if the Companys stockholder approval
for the Proposed Stone Merger is not obtained and a third party
acquisition proposal has been made or otherwise becomes publicly
known or any person has publicly announced an intention to make
a third party acquisition proposal and, within 12 months
after termination of the Stone Merger Agreement, the Company or
any of its subsidiaries enters into a definitive agreement with
respect to, or consummates, a third party acquisition proposal.
The foregoing description of the Stone Merger Agreement is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
Stone Merger Agreement which has been filed as an exhibit to the
Company
Form S-4.
The Company
Form S-4
also contains a summary of the terms of the Proposed Stone
Merger.
The purpose of the solicitation made by this Proxy Statement is
to enable the Companys stockholders to satisfy one of the
conditions to the Offer which would allow stockholders to decide
for themselves which proposal is financially superior and to act
accordingly.
WE URGE YOU TO VOTE AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES
TO STONE STOCKHOLDERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED STONE
MERGER ON THE [COLOR] PROXY CARD ACCOMPANYING THIS PROXY
STATEMENT. THIS WILL GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO DECIDE FOR
YOURSELF WHETHER THE OFFER OF $23.00 PER SHARE, OR IN CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES $23.50 OR $24.00 PER SHARE, IN CASH IS IN YOUR
BEST INTERESTS.
The Companys stockholders will lose the opportunity to
accept the Offer if they approve the issuance of Shares in
connection with the Proposed Stone Merger. If the proposal
providing for such issuance is rejected by the
8
Companys stockholders, we believe that the Companys
directors will be convinced to respect your vote and will,
consistent with their fiduciary duties, take all necessary
action in accordance with their fiduciary duties to allow the
Offer to proceed.
CERTAIN
INFORMATION CONCERNING ATS AND WOODSIDE
ATS is a recently incorporated Delaware corporation organized in
connection with the Offer and the Second-Step Merger and has not
carried on any activities other than in connection with the
Offer and the Second-Step Merger, except that ATS acquired
1,719,000 Shares in the open market from August 15,
2006 to August 23, 2006. As of the date of the filing of
this Proxy Statement with the Commission, ATS owned of record,
and Woodside and ATS share beneficial ownership (as defined for
purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) of,
1,719,000 Shares, or approximately 4.5% of the outstanding
Shares. The principal offices of ATS are located at 71683
Riverside Drive, Covington, Louisiana 70433, and the telephone
number is
(985) 249-5300.
ATS is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Woodside.
Until immediately prior to the time that ATS will purchase
Shares pursuant to the Offer, it is not anticipated that ATS
will have any significant assets or liabilities or engage in
activities other than those incidental to its formation and
capitalization and the transactions contemplated by the Offer
and the Second-Step Merger, including the Shares it acquires as
referenced above. Because ATS is recently formed and has minimal
assets and capitalization, no meaningful financial information
regarding ATS is available.
Woodside is a company incorporated under the laws of Victoria,
Australia, with its principal executive offices located at
Woodside Plaza, 240 St. Georges Terrace, Perth,
Western Australia 6000. The telephone number of Woodside is
011-61-8-9348-4000.
Woodside is Australias largest publicly-listed oil and gas
company. It was established in 1954, is listed on the Australian
Stock Exchange (ASX) and has a market capitalization of about
$21 billion. Woodside has about 3,400 employees and
has exploration interests in 11 countries, and production
from four. Since 1992, American Depositary Receipts, each
representing one Woodside share, have been traded over the
counter under the trade symbol WOPEY. Woodside has
not sponsored the issue of these ADRs.
The name, citizenship, business address, business telephone
number, principal occupation or employment, and five-year
employment history for each of the directors and executive
officers of ATS and the members of the management and
supervisory boards of Woodside and certain other information are
set forth in Schedule I hereto. Except as described in
Schedule I hereto, none of ATS, Woodside or, to the best
knowledge of ATS, any of the persons listed on Schedule I
hereto, has during the last five years (i) been convicted
in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or
similar misdemeanors) or (ii) been a party to any judicial
or administrative proceeding (except for matters that were
dismissed without sanction or settlement) that resulted in a
judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future
violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or
state securities laws or finding any violation of such laws.
Except as described in Schedule II hereto, (i) none of
ATS, Woodside nor, to the best knowledge of ATS, any of the
persons listed in Schedule I hereto or any associate or
majority owned subsidiary of ATS, Woodside or any of the persons
so listed, beneficially owns or has any right to acquire any
Shares and (ii) none of ATS, Woodside nor, to the best
knowledge of ATS, any of the persons or entities referred to
above nor any director, executive officer or subsidiary of any
of the foregoing has effected any transaction in the Shares
during the past 60 days.
Other than in connection with the Offer and the second-step
merger following such offer, none of ATS, Woodside nor, to the
best knowledge of ATS, any of the persons listed in
Schedule I hereto has any contract, agreement, arrangement
or understanding, whether or not legally enforceable, with any
other person with respect to any securities of the Company,
including, but not limited to, the transfer or voting of such
securities, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or
calls, guaranties of loans, guaranties against loss or the
giving or withholding of proxies, consents or authorizations.
During the two years prior to the date of the filing of the
proxy statement, none of ATS, Woodside nor, to the best
knowledge of ATS, any of the persons listed on Schedule I
hereto has had any transaction with the Company or any of its
executive officers, directors or affiliates that is required to
be reported under the rules and regulations of the Commission
applicable to the Offer. Except as set forth in the filing of
the proxy statement, during the two years prior to the date of
the Offer to Purchase, there have been no negotiations,
transactions or material contacts between any of ATS, Woodside
or any of their respective subsidiaries
9
or, to the best knowledge of ATS, any of the persons listed in
Schedule I hereto, on the one hand, and the Company or its
affiliates, on the other hand, concerning a merger,
consolidation or acquisition, tender offer for or other
acquisition of any class of the Companys securities, an
election of the Companys directors or a sale or other
transfer of a material amount of assets of the Company.
OTHER
PROPOSALS
In addition to soliciting proxies to approve the issuance of
Shares to Stone stockholders, in connection with the Proposed
Stone Merger the Companys Board is also soliciting proxies
for the Special Meeting for (i) the adoption of
Companys Amended and Restated 2006 Long Term Stock
Incentive Plan (the Long Term Incentive Plan) and
(ii) a proposed amendment to the Companys certificate
of incorporation to increase the number of authorized common
shares from 100,000,000 to 150,000,000 if the Proposed Stone
Merger occurs (the Proposed Charter Amendment). ATS
recommends voting AGAINST these proposals. These
proposals, in our judgment, stem from the Proposed Stone Merger
and as such are not advisable or necessary if the Stone Merger
Agreement is terminated.
YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE WITH RESPECT TO ALL THREE
PROPOSALS ON OUR [COLOR] PROXY CARD. THEREFORE, THERE IS NO
NEED TO VOTE ON THE COMPANYS PROXY CARD.
Other than as set forth above, ATS is not aware of any other
proposals to be brought before the Special Meeting. Should other
proposals be brought before the Special Meeting, the persons
named on the [COLOR] proxy card will abstain from voting on such
proposals unless such proposals adversely affect the interests
of ATS as determined by ATS in its sole discretion, in which
event such persons will vote on such proposals at their
discretion.
VOTING
PROCEDURES
According to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as of August 7,
2006, there were 38,396,001 Shares outstanding, and, as of
June 30, 2006, there were 1,996,065 Shares issuable
under outstanding stock options and stock units (1,243,711 of
which were vested), 331,190 performance share awards
(assuming maximum payout level), 722,566 other share awards and
3,103,335 Shares issuable pursuant to warrants issued by
the Company. ATS currently owns 1,719,000 Shares, which
were recently acquired in open market transactions as set forth
more fully on Schedule II.
Under the Companys bylaws, the presence, in person or by
proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares is
necessary to constitute a quorum at the Special Meeting. In
accordance with the New York Stock Exchange rules, brokers and
nominees who hold Shares in street-name for customers may not
exercise their voting discretion with respect to the approval of
the issuance of Shares to Stone stockholders as a result of the
Proposed Stone Merger, approval of the Charter Amendment or
adoption of the amendment to the Long Term Stock Incentive Plan.
Thus, absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of
such Shares, brokers and nominees may not vote such Shares with
respect to the approval of those proposals.
The approval of the issuance of Shares to the Stone stockholders
pursuant to the Stone Merger Agreement requires approval of a
majority of votes cast on that proposal, so long as the total
votes cast in that proposal represent over 50% of all Shares
entitled to vote on such proposal. Abstentions count as votes
cast. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast.
The foregoing vote requirements will also apply with respect to
the proposal to amend the Long Term Incentive Plan.
Approval of the Proposed Charter Amendment (unlike the other two
proposals) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding Shares. Therefore abstentions and broker non-votes
will effectively be treated as votes AGAINST the
proposal.
The Companys stockholders (i) may vote
AGAINST any or all of the three proposals,
(ii) may abstain from voting on any or all of the three
proposals or (iii) may vote for such proposals by marking
the proper box on the [COLOR] proxy card and signing, dating and
returning it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If
a Company stockholder returns a [COLOR] proxy card that is
signed, dated and not marked, that stockholder will be deemed to
have voted AGAINST the issuance of Shares in
connection with the Proposed Stone Merger,
10
AGAINST the amendment to increase the number of
authorized shares, and AGAINST the adoption of the
Long Term Incentive Plan. Only the Companys stockholders
(or their duly appointed proxies) of record on the Record Date
are eligible to submit a proxy.
Both because (i) assuming a quorum is present, only the
approval of a majority of the votes cast (so long as the
total votes cast represent over 50% of all Shares entitled to
vote on this proposal) at the Special Meeting on the
proposal relating to the issuance of Shares in the Merger is
required to approve the issuance of Shares to Stone stockholders
to effectuate the Proposed Stone Merger (as opposed to a
majority of the total outstanding Shares as would be typical in
approving a merger under Delaware law) and (ii) a significant
change in stock ownership has occurred since the record date
and since ATS publicly disclosed its intention to make the
Offer, ATS does not believe that the vote to be held at the
Special Meeting will necessarily be representative of the views
of the Companys stockholders on the Proposed Stone Merger
and on the other matters to be voted on.
Our goal is to defeat the Proposed Stone Merger. There are
two ways to do so. If we obtain a sufficient number of votes
AGAINST the issuance of Shares to Stone stockholders
in connection with the Proposed Stone Merger to clearly defeat
the proposal, then we will vote your Shares. However, there are
circumstances under which it may be possible to defeat the
Companys Boards proposal by withholding proxies and
denying the Company a quorum (for the reasons discussed above).
ATS WOULD LIKE, IS REQUESTING, AND BY SIGNING THE [COLOR] CARD,
THE STOCKHOLDER WILL BE GRANTING TO ATS, THE FLEXIBILITY TO
EXERCISE THAT OPTION IN THE EVENT THAT ATS DETERMINES IN GOOD
FAITH THAT DOING SO MAY BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE MEANS TO DEFEAT
THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER. Accordingly, you should understand
that by voting AGAINST the issuance of Shares to
Stone stockholders in connection with the Proposed Stone Merger
on the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card, you will be deemed also to
be granting ATS the right, if we believe in good faith that such
course of action will defeat the Proposed Stone Merger, to
either not submit your proxy card at the Special Meeting or
cause the persons named as proxies on such card not to attend
the Special Meeting; provided that if a [COLOR] card is properly
marked to vote FOR any of the proposals to be voted
upon at the Special Meeting and is not revoked, we will take
action to ensure it is voted. In the event that ATS determines
to withhold proxies in order to try to defeat quorum at the
Special Meeting, ATS disclaims any liability, fiduciary or
otherwise, to stockholders of the Company were a quorum actually
attained at any such meeting.
Whether or not you attend the Special Meeting, we urge you to
vote AGAINST the Stone Merger Agreement on the
enclosed [COLOR] proxy card by signing, dating and immediately
returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided. ONLY YOUR
LATEST-DATED PROXY COUNTS. Execution and delivery of a proxy by
a record holder will be presumed to be a proxy with respect to
all Shares held by such record holder unless the proxy specifies
otherwise.
YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE BY
ATTENDING THE SPECIAL MEETING AND VOTING IN PERSON, BY
SUBMITTING A DULY EXECUTED, LATER DATED PROXY OR BY SUBMITTING A
WRITTEN NOTICE OF REVOCATION TO EITHER (A) ATS, CARE OF
INNISFREE M&A INCORPORATED, 501 MADISON AVENUE, 20TH FLOOR,
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022, OR (B) THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES OF THE COMPANY AT 201 ST. CHARLES AVENUE,
SUITE 3400, NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70170. A REVOCATION MAY
BE IN ANY WRITTEN FORM VALIDLY SIGNED BY THE RECORD HOLDER
AS LONG AS IT CLEARLY STATES THAT THE PROXY PREVIOUSLY GIVEN IS
NO LONGER EFFECTIVE. WE REQUEST THAT A COPY OF ANY REVOCATION
SENT TO THE COMPANY ALSO BE SENT TO ATS, CARE OF INNISFREE
M&A INCORPORATED, AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS SO THAT ATS MAY MORE
ACCURATELY DETERMINE IF AND WHEN PROXIES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED FROM
THE HOLDERS OF RECORD ON THE RECORD DATE OF A MAJORITY OF THE
COMPANYS SHARES THEN OUTSTANDING. UNLESS REVOKED IN
THE MANNER SET FORTH ABOVE, SUBJECT TO THE FOREGOING, DULY
EXECUTED PROXIES IN THE FORM ENCLOSED WILL BE VOTED AT THE
SPECIAL MEETING ON THE STONE MERGER AGREEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
YOUR INSTRUCTIONS. IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH INSTRUCTIONS, SUCH
PROXIES WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF
SHARES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER.
11
BY EXECUTING THE [COLOR] CARD YOU ARE AUTHORIZING THE PERSONS
NAMED AS PROXIES TO REVOKE ALL PRIOR PROXIES ON YOUR BEHALF EVEN
IF WE DETERMINE NOT TO DELIVER THE PROXIES AS INDICATED ABOVE.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your Shares, please contact:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue
20th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Shareholders Call Toll Free:
(877) 456-3427
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5833
DISSENTERS
RIGHTS
The Companys stockholders are not entitled to appraisal
rights in connection with the Proposed Stone Merger.
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Except as set forth below, ATS will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust
company or other nominee for the solicitation of proxies in
connection with the Offer.
Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, telefax,
telegraph, the internet,
e-mail,
newspapers and other publications of general distribution and in
person. Directors, officers and certain employees of ATS and
Woodside and the other participants listed on Schedule I
hereto may assist in the solicitation of proxies without any
additional remuneration (except as otherwise set forth in this
Proxy Statement).
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (Credit Suisse)
is acting as Dealer Manager in connection with the Offer and has
provided certain financial advisory services to ATS and Woodside
in connection with the acquisition of the Company. In its role
as Dealer Manager, Credit Suisse may contact brokers, dealers
and similar entities and may provide information regarding the
Offer to those that it contacts or persons that contact Credit
Suisse. Credit Suisse has not been engaged to solicit proxies
relating to the Special Meeting. Credit Suisse is being paid
reasonable and customary compensation for its services as Dealer
Manager in connection with the Offer and for its services as
financial advisor. Credit Suisse is also entitled to
reimbursement for certain expenses incurred by Credit Suisse,
including the reasonable fees and expenses of legal counsel, and
to indemnification against certain liabilities and expenses in
connection with its engagements, including certain liabilities
under the federal securities laws.
Credit Suisse and its affiliates have provided and may in the
future provide various investment banking, financial advisory
and other services to Woodside or its affiliates, for which they
have received or may receive customary compensation. In the
ordinary course of business, including in their trading and
brokerage operations and in a fiduciary capacity, Credit Suisse
and its affiliates may hold positions, both long and short, for
their own accounts and for those of their customers, in the
Shares.
Woodside (on behalf of ATS) has retained Innisfree M&A
Incorporated (Innisfree) for solicitation and
advisory services in connection with solicitations relating to
the Special Meeting, for which Innisfree is to receive a fee up
to $ in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for the Special Meeting. Up to
100 people may be employed by Innisfree in connection with
the solicitation of proxies for the Special Meeting. Woodside
(on behalf of ATS) has also agreed to reimburse Innisfree for
out-of-pocket
expenses and to indemnify Innisfree against certain liabilities
and expenses, including reasonable legal fees and related
charges. Innisfree will solicit proxies for the Special Meeting
from individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other
institutional holders. Directors, officers and certain employees
of Woodside and ATS may assist in the solicitation of proxies
without any additional remuneration. The entire expense of
soliciting proxies for the Special Meeting by or on behalf of
ATS is being borne by Woodside.
If you have any questions concerning this Proxy Statement or the
procedures to be followed to execute and deliver a proxy, please
contact Innisfree at the address or phone number specified above.
12
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
are based on our various underlying assumptions and expectations
and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. Although we believe these
assumptions are reasonable, we cannot assure you that they will
prove correct. Accordingly, you should not rely upon
forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
Further, we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking
statements after the date they are made or to conform the
statements to actual results or changes in our expectations.
The following important factors could affect future results and
could cause those results to differ materially from those
expressed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to: global economic and political conditions; conditions
and trends in the industry; volatility in the financial markets;
pending, threatened or future legal proceedings; and events
which may be subject to circumstances beyond our control.
OTHER
INFORMATION
The information concerning the Company and the Proposed Stone
Merger contained herein has been taken from, or is based upon,
publicly available documents on file with the Commission and
other publicly available information. Although ATS has no
knowledge that would indicate that statements relating to the
Company or the Stone Merger Agreement contained in this Proxy
Statement in reliance upon publicly available information are
inaccurate or incomplete, it has not to date had access to the
books and records of the Company, was not involved in the
preparation of such information and statements and is not in a
position to verify any such information or statements.
Accordingly, ATS does not take any responsibility for the
accuracy or completeness of such information or for any failure
by the Company to disclose events that may have occurred and may
affect the significance or accuracy of any such information.
Reference is made to the Company
Form S-4
including, without limitation, the joint proxy
statement/prospectus contained therein for information
concerning the common stock of the Company, the beneficial
ownership of such stock by the principal holders thereof, other
information concerning the Companys management, the
procedures for submitting proposals for consideration at the
next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company and certain
other matters regarding the Company and the Special Meeting. ATS
assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of
any such information.
The information contained in this Proxy Statement concerning the
Offer is taken from, and qualified in its entirety by reference
to, the full text of the Offer to Purchase and the Letter of
Transmittal.
Except as described herein, ATS is not aware of any other matter
to be considered at the Special Meeting. However, if any other
matter properly comes before the Special Meeting, ATS will vote
all proxies held by it as ATS, in its sole discretion, may
determine, to the extent the Shares which they represent are
present at the Special Meeting.
WE URGE YOU NOT TO RETURN ANY PROXY CARD YOU RECEIVE FROM THE
COMPANY. EVEN IF YOU PREVIOUSLY HAVE SUBMITTED A PROXY CARD
FURNISHED BY THE COMPANY, IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE
BY SIMPLY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED [COLOR]
PROXY CARD TODAY. IF YOU SUBMIT THE COMPANYS [COLOR] CARD,
EVEN IF YOU VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER,
THE COMPANY CAN USE YOUR SHARES TO ESTABLISH A QUORUM AND
THEREBY USE THE [COLOR] CARD TO ASSIST THEM IN OBTAINING THE
NECESSARY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER. THEREFORE, WE
URGE YOU TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED [COLOR] PROXY
CARD TO US.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING, YOUR
PROMPT ACTION IS IMPORTANT. MAKE YOUR VIEWS CLEAR TO YOUR BOARD
OF DIRECTORS BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED
[COLOR] PROXY CARD TODAY.
ATS INC.
[ ],
2006
13
IMPORTANT
VOTING INFORMATION
1. If your shares are held in your own name, please sign,
date and return the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card to ATS Inc.,
care of Innisfree M&A Incorporated, in the postage-paid
envelope provided.
2. If your shares are held in street-name, only
your broker or bank can vote your shares and only upon receipt
of your specific instructions. If your shares are held in
street-name, deliver the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card
to your broker or bank or contact the person responsible for
your account to vote on your behalf and to ensure that a [COLOR]
proxy card is submitted on your behalf. We urge you to confirm
in writing your instructions to the person responsible for your
account and to provide a copy of those instructions to ATS Inc.,
care of Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501 Madison Avenue,
20th Floor, New York, New York 10022, so that ATS will be
aware of all instructions given and can attempt to ensure that
such instructions are followed.
3. Do not sign or return any [COLOR] proxy card you may
receive from the Company. If you have already submitted a
[COLOR] proxy card, it is not too late to change your
vote simply sign, date and return the [COLOR] proxy
card. Only your latest dated proxy will be counted.
4. Only the Companys stockholders of record on
August 28, 2006 are entitled to vote at the Special
Meeting. We urge each stockholder to ensure that the holder of
record of his or her share(s) signs, dates, and returns the
enclosed [COLOR] proxy card as soon as possible.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your shares, please contact:
Innisfree
M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue
20th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Shareholders
Call Toll Free:
(877) 456-3427
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5833
THIS PROXY STATEMENT RELATES TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IN
OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF
SHARES IN CONNECTION WITH THE STONE MERGER AGREEMENT AND IS
NOT A REQUEST FOR THE TENDER OF SHARES OF THE
COMPANYS COMMON STOCK NOR ANY OFFER WITH RESPECT THERETO.
OUR OFFER IS BEING MADE ONLY BY MEANS OF AN OFFER TO PURCHASE
AND THE RELATED LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL, WHICH HAVE BEEN
SEPARATELY MAILED TO THE COMPANYS STOCKHOLDERS. BEFORE
MAKING ANY DECISION REGARDING THE OFFER, YOU SHOULD READ THE
OFFER TO PURCHASE, WHICH SETS FORTH IN DETAIL THE TERMS AND
CONDITION OF THE OFFER.
THIS PROXY STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SOLICITATION OF
CONSENTS WITH RESPECT TO ANY ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT BY THE
COMPANYS STOCKHOLDERS. ANY CONSENT SOLICITATION (INCLUDING
A CONSENT SOLICITATION TO REMOVE OR APPOINT DIRECTORS) WILL BE
MADE ONLY PURSUANT TO SEPARATE CONSENT SOLICITATION MATERIALS
COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 14(A) OF THE
EXCHANGE ACT.
14
SCHEDULE I
INFORMATION
CONCERNING DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF WOODSIDE AND ATS
|
|
1.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of ATS.
|
The following table sets forth the name, current business
address, citizenship, current principal occupation or
employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or
employments and business addresses thereof for the past five
years of each director and executive officer of ATS. Unless
otherwise indicated, the current business address of each person
is 71683 Riverside Drive, Covington, Louisiana 70433. Unless
otherwise indicated, each such person is a citizen of the United
States, and each occupation set forth opposite an
individuals name refers to employment with ATS.
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years and
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Business Address Thereof
|
|
Mark Chatterji
Business Address:
Woodside Plaza
240 St Georges Terrace
Perth, Western Australia 6000
|
|
President and Director of ATS.
Mr. Chatterji has been Director of Commercial, Woodside
Energy Ltd. since 2004. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Chatterji
served as a Captain in the United States Army,
1st Battalion, 162nd Infantry. Prior to this,
Mr. Chatterji was a Vice President at Goldman
Sachs & Co.
|
Jeff Soine
Business Address:
Sage Plaza
5151 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX 77056
|
|
Secretary and Director of ATS.
Mr. Soine has been Acquisition Manager of Woodside Energy
(USA) Inc. since June 2005. Prior to this, Mr. Soine was
Acquisitions Manager of W&T Offshore Inc. from 2000 to 2005.
|
Troy Hayden
Citizenship: Australia
|
|
Treasurer of ATS. Mr. Hayden
is also Chief Financial Officer of Woodside Energy (USA) Inc., a
position he has held since 2005. Prior to this, Mr. Hayden
was Chief Financial Officer of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. from 2004
to 2005 and Treasurer of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. from 1996 to
2004.
|
|
|
2.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of Woodside.
|
The following table sets forth the name, current business
address, citizenship, current principal occupation or
employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or
employments and business addresses thereof for the past five
years of each director and each executive officer of Woodside.
Unless otherwise indicated, the current business address of each
person is Woodside Plaza, 240 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western
Australia 6000. Unless otherwise indicated, each such person is
a citizen of Australia. Unless otherwise indicated, each
occupation set forth opposite an individuals name refers
to employment with Woodside.
DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years and
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Business Address Thereof
|
|
Jillian Rosemary Broadbent
|
|
Ms. Broadbent has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since 1998. Ms. Broadbent is also a Director of
Coca-Cola
Amatil Limited and Special Broadcasting Service and a Board
Member of Reserve Bank of Australia, positions she has held
since 1999, 2002 and 1998, respectively. Previously,
Ms. Broadbent was a Director of Westfield Management Ltd.
and Director of Westfield America Management Ltd. from 2002 to
2004.
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years and
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Business Address Thereof
|
|
Dr. Ashton Trevor Calvert
|
|
Dr. Calvert is a Non-Executive
Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside Energy Ltd. and
a Director of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Ltd., positions he has
held since 2005. Prior to that, Dr. Calvert was a Director
of The Australian Trade Commission and a Director of The
Australian Strategic Policy Institute Ltd.
|
Michael Alfred Chaney
|
|
Mr. Chaney has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since 2005. He has been Chairman and Non-Executive
Director of National Australia Bank Limited since 2004, a Member
of JPMorgan International Council since 2003 and President of
Business Council of Australia since 2005. Mr. Chaney also
currently serves as Director of National Equities Limited and
Chairman of Gresham Partners Holdings Ltd. From 1992 to 2004
Mr. Chaney was Managing Director and Chief Executive
Officer of Wesfarmers Limited, from 1995 to 2005 a Director of
BHP Billiton Limited, from 2001 to 2005 a Director of BHP Plc
and from 1990 to 2005 a Director of Gresham Partners Group
Limited.
|
Erich Fraunschiel
|
|
Mr. Fraunschiel has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since 2002. He has also served as Non-Executive
Director of West Australian Newspaper Holdings Ltd. and Chairman
of Wesfarmers Insurance Ltd. since 2002, Non-Executive Director
of WorleyParsons Limited, Rabobank Australia Ltd. and Rabo
Australia Ltd. since 2003, Chairman of Lumley General Insurance
Ltd. since 2003 and Non-Executive Director of The WCM Group Ltd.
since 2005. Mr. Fraunschiel served as Non-Executive
Director of Foodland Associated Limited from 2002 to 2004.
|
Charles Barrington Goode
|
|
Mr. Goode has been Chairman of
Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside Energy Ltd since 1999. He
also serves as Chairman of Australia and New Zealand banking
Group Ltd., Chairman of Diversified United Investment Ltd. and
Chairman of Ian Potter Foundation Ltd.
|
Andrew Jamieson
Citizenship: United Kingdom
|
|
Mr. Jamieson is a Non-Executive
Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside Energy Ltd. and
Executive Vice President, Gas Projects of Shell Global Solutions
International BY, positions he has held since 2005. Prior to
this, Mr. Jamieson was Managing Director of Nigeria LNG
Ltd.
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years and
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Business Address Thereof
|
|
Jakob Stausholm
Citizenship: Denmark
|
|
Mr. Stausholm has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since June 2006. Mr. Stausholm is also Vice
President, Finance E&P of Shell EP International Limited, a
position he has held since 2006. Prior to this,
Mr. Stausholm was Chief Internal Auditor at Royal Dutch
Shell Plc from 2002 to 2006 and Finance Manager of Shell Europe
Oil Products, Commercial from 2000 to 2002.
|
Donald R. Voelte, Jr.
Citizenship: United States
|
|
Mr. Voelte has been Managing
Director and Chief Executive Officer, Woodside Energy Ltd since
2004. Prior to that,Mr. Voelte was Director, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Chroma Energy Ltd.
|
Dr Pierre Jean-Marie Henri
Jungels
Citizenship: Belgium
|
|
Dr. Jungels has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since December 2002. Dr. Jungels is also a
Director of Imperial Tobacco Group Plc, a position he has held
since 2002, Chairman of Offshore Hydrocarbon Mapping Plc, a
position he has held since 2004, Chairman of Rockhopper
Exploration Plc, a position he has held since February 2005,
Chairman of Oxford Catalyst Ltd, a position he has held since
March 2006, and Director of Baker Hughes Inc., a position he has
held since April 2006. Prior to this, Dr. Jungels was a
Director of Offshore Logistics Plc (Bristow Group) from
September 2002 to August 2006, President of Institute of
Petroleum from June 2002 to December 2003, and Chief Executive
Officer of Enterprise Oil Plc from October 1996 to October 2001.
|
David Ian McEvoy
Citizenship: Australian
|
|
Mr. McEvoy has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since September 2005. Mr. McEvoy is also a
Non-Executive Director of Innamincka Petroleum Limited, a
position he has held since September 2003, a Non-Executive
Director of Po Valley Energy Limited, a position he has held
since September 2003, and a Non-Executive Director of Australian
Worldwide Exploration Ltd, a position he has held since June
2006. Prior to this, Mr. McEvoy was Vice President of
ExxonMobil Exploration Company from 1992 to May 2002.
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years and
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Business Address Thereof
|
|
Russell Ronald Caplan
Citizenship: Australian
|
|
Mr. Caplan has been a
Non-Executive Director of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and Woodside
Energy Ltd. since February 2006. Mr. Caplan is also
Chairman of Shell Australia Ltd., a position he has held since
February 2006. Mr. Caplan is also Chairman of Australian
Institute of Petroleum, a position he has held since March 2006.
Prior to that, Mr. Caplan was Senior Vice President
Globalisation of Shell International Petroleum Co. from August
2004 to February 2006, Vice President Sales & Marketing
of Shell Oil Products U.S. from September 2001 to March 2004,
and Executive Vice President Global Marketing of Shell
International Oil Products from January 1999 to September 2001.
|
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or
|
|
|
Employment; Material Positions
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years and
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Business Address Thereof
|
|
Robert Cole
|
|
Mr. Cole has been Company
Secretary of Woodside Petroleum Ltd. and general counsel of
Woodside Energy Ltd. since April 2006. Prior to this,
Mr. Cole was a partner at Mallesons Stephen Jacques from
January 1992 to April 2006.
|
Frances Margaret Kernot
Citizenship: Australia and New Zealand
|
|
Ms. Kernot has been Company
Secretary of Woodside Petroleum Ltd., Woodside Energy Ltd. and
Australian group subsidiaries since January 2004. Prior to this,
Ms. Kernot served as Company Secretary of LCB Holdings and
Little Creatures Brewing Pty Ltd. from July 2000 to April 2005
and Compliance Officer, Managed Investments for Yates Limited
from June 1996 to June 2003.
|
Mark Chatterji
Citizenship: United States
|
|
Mr. Chatterji has been Director of
Commercial, Woodside Energy Ltd. since 2004. For biographical
information see under Directors and Executive Officers of
ATS above.
|
18
SCHEDULE II
ACQUISITIONS
AND DISPOSITIONS OF SHARES BY ATS, WOODSIDE
AND THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF ATS AND
WOODSIDE
Other than purchases of Shares in the open market by ATS as set
forth in the table below, none of ATS, Woodside or any executive
officer or director of ATS or Woodside has engaged in any
transaction involving the Shares in the past 60 days:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Date
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
15-Aug-06
|
|
|
76,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.7535
|
|
16-Aug-06
|
|
|
284,900
|
|
|
$
|
17.9877
|
|
17-Aug-06
|
|
|
384,900
|
|
|
$
|
17.7292
|
|
18-Aug-06
|
|
|
219,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.7973
|
|
21-Aug-06
|
|
|
181,600
|
|
|
$
|
18.1465
|
|
22-Aug-06
|
|
|
94,200
|
|
|
$
|
18.2207
|
|
23-Aug-06
|
|
|
478,400
|
|
|
$
|
18.1728
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,719,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.9763
|
|
19
IMPORTANT
If your shares are held in your own name, please sign, date and
return the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card today. If your shares are
held in Street-Name, only your broker or bank can
vote your shares and only upon receipt of your specific
instructions. Please return the enclosed [COLOR] proxy card to
your broker or bank and contact the person responsible for your
account to ensure that a [COLOR] proxy card is voted on your
behalf.
We urge you not to sign any proxy card you may receive from the
Company, even in protest.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your shares, please contact:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue
20th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Shareholders Call Toll Free:
(877) 456-3427
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5833
20
PRELIMINARY
COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
SEPTEMBER , 2006
[FORM OF PROXY CARD [COLOR]
ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD.
SOLICITATION BY ATS INC.
IN OPPOSITION TO THE SOLICITATION BY THE BOARD OF ENERGY
PARTNERS, LTD.
The undersigned, a holder of record of shares of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share (Common Shares), of
Energy Partners, Ltd. (the Company) acknowledges
receipt of the Proxy Statement of ATS Inc.,
dated ,
2006, and the undersigned revokes all prior proxies delivered in
connection with the Special Meeting of Stockholders of the
Company to approve the issuance of Common Shares pursuant to the
Stone Merger Agreement and all other matters related to the
Stone Merger Agreement including those set forth below and
appoints and ,
or each of them, with full power of substitution, proxies for
the undersigned to vote all Common Shares of the Company which
the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the Special Meeting
and any adjournments, postponements or reschedulings thereof,
and instructs said proxies to vote as follows.
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED HEREIN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE. IF NO SPECIFICATIONS
ARE MADE AND YOU HAVE SIGNED AND DATED THIS PROXY CARD, THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED AGAINST EACH OF THE PROPOSALS.
THIS PROXY WILL REVOKE (OR BE USED BY THE PROXIES TO REVOKE) ANY
PRIOR PROXY DELIVERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
PROPOSALS LISTED BELOW TO THE EXTENT IT IS VOTED AT THE
MEETING AS STIPULATED BELOW.
YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT BY RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD TO ATS
AND VOTING AGAINST THE PROPOSALS LISTED ABOVE,
YOU WILL ALSO BE DEEMED TO BE GRANTING ATS THE RIGHT TO EITHER
NOT SUBMIT YOUR PROXY CARD OR CAUSE THE PROXIES NOT TO ATTEND
THE SPECIAL MEETING IF WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH THAT SUCH COURSE
OF ACTION IS MORE LIKELY TO DEFEAT THE PROPOSED STONE MERGER;
PROVIDED THAT IF YOU RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD TO ATS AND VOTE
FOR ANY OF THE PROPOSALS, WE WILL TAKE ACTION TO
ENSURE IT IS VOTED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING.
BY EXECUTING THE [COLOR] CARD YOU ARE AUTHORIZING THE PERSONS
NAMED AS PROXIES TO REVOKE ALL PRIOR PROXIES ON YOUR BEHALF EVEN
IF WE DETERMINE NOT TO DELIVER THE PROXIES AS INDICATED ABOVE.
(continued
and to be signed and dated on reverse)
ATS STRONGLY
RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST EACH OF THE FOLLOWING
PROPOSALS.
|
|
1. |
To approve the issuance of the Companys common stock to
Stone Energy Corporations stockholders as a result of the
proposed merger of Stone Energy Corporation with and into EPL
Acquisition Corp. LLC, as a result of the transactions
contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
June 22, 2006, by and among the Company, EPL Acquisition
Corp. LLC and Stone Energy Corporation.
|
o AGAINST o FOR o ABSTAIN
|
|
2. |
To approve the amendment to the Companys certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized common shares
from 100,000,000 to 150,000,000 if the merger occurs.
|
o AGAINST o FOR o ABSTAIN
|
|
3. |
To approve the adoption of the Companys Amended and
Restated 2006 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan.
|
o AGAINST o FOR o ABSTAIN
IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON
SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS, POSTPONEMENTS OR RESCHEDULINGS
THEREOF ON BEHALF OF THE UNDERSIGNED.
Dated: ,
2006
Signature of Stockholder
Signature of Stockholder (if held jointly)
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear hereon. If
shares are held jointly, each stockholder should sign. When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation,
please sign in full corporate name by president or authorized
officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by
authorized person.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.