ORTHOFIX
INTERNATIONAL
N.V.
|
(Name
of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
RAMIUS
VALUE AND OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND LTD
RAMIUS
ENTERPRISE MASTER FUND LTD
RAMIUS
ADVISORS, LLC
RCG
STARBOARD ADVISORS, LLC
RAMIUS
LLC
C4S
& CO., L.L.C.
PETER
A. COHEN
MORGAN
B. STARK
JEFFREY
M. SOLOMON
THOMAS
W. STRAUSS
J. MICHAEL
EGAN
PETER A.
FELD
STEVEN J.
LEE
CHARLES T.
ORSATTI
|
(Name
of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the
Registrant)
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
·
|
“Orthofix’s
share price and financial performance have suffered since Blackstone’s
acquisition in FY06. The company’s share price has lagged its peer group,
while its financial performance has deteriorated due to sustained
operating losses at the Blackstone
division.”
|
·
|
“Notwithstanding
management’s favorable outlook for Blackstone, we note that the company
took a $289.5 (87% of $330 million acquisition price) million impairment
charge for Blackstone in FY08. This we believe suggests that the
acquisition is unlikely to yield the desired results, even if the
turnaround strategy works.”
|
·
|
“As
such, given the company’s sustained underperformance relative to its peer
group since the Blackstone acquisition, we believe that the board could
benefit from greater shareholder representation. Though Ramius is seeking
minority representation (four out of ten board seats) and has made a valid
case for change, based on our review of the dissident nominees, we
recommend shareholders vote FOR the election of Peter Feld, Michael Egan
and Charles Orsatti.”
|
·
|
“Our
analysis indicates that Orthofix performed in line with its peer group
over the 1, 3 and 5 year periods for the period ending July 30, 2006, just
prior to the acquisition of Blackstone. Since the acquisition announcement
on Aug. 7, 2006, however, the company’s share price has declined 61.6%
versus an average 32.2% for the peer
group.
|
·
|
“We
believe such significant share price underperformance to its peer group,
lends credence to Ramius’ argument that the acquisition has not been value
creative for shareholders.”
|
·
|
“Orthofix’s
poor share price performance since Blackstone acquisition could be
attributed to the negative impact of Blackstone on overall financial
performance. Our analysis indicates that not only has Blackstone’s revenue
growth lagged other business segments, but also its operating losses have
negatively impacted the company’s overall
profitability.”
|
·
|
“Moreover,
sustained losses at the Blackstone division have affected company’s debt
coverage ratios, which likely caused the company to amend its credit
facility in Sept 2008. Pursuant to the amended terms, the effective
interest rate on the $290 million term loan increased to LIBOR + 4.5% from
LIBOR + 1.75% previously.”
|
·
|
“We
looked at management’s historical track record of earnings guidance to
assess if the market is likely to believe in its expectation of achieving
positive operating profit for Blackstone in 4QFY09. This we believe, is
important given Blackstone has adversely impacted the company’s overall
profitability and thereby share price
performance.”
|
·
|
“Based
on Reuters Knowledge database, we note that over the last 10 quarters
(beginning 3QFY06), the company missed its revenue guidance 6 times and
GAAP EPS guidance four times. On an annual basis, the company has missed
revenue guidance twice in the last three years (though the percentage miss
is small) and GAAP EPS in all the three
years.”
|
·
|
“Regarding
dissident nominees, we note that although Peter Feld has the least
company/sector experience, he represents a significant shareholder and as
such his interests are likely to be aligned with other
shareholders.”
|
·
|
“Among
other dissident nominees, we support Michael Egan and Charles Orsatti for
their sector/industry experience. Additionally, we note that the company
had previously been willing to interview both Mr. Egan and Orsatti for
board seats.”
|
·
|
And
though the company has raised concerns about Ramius’ desire to quickly
sell the Blackstone division, we note that such a decision would require
the support of the entire or at least majority of the board members, and
that Ramius and its nominees would only represent a minority, if elected.
This coupled with the fiduciary obligations of directors should ensure
that dissident nominees act in the best interest of all
shareholders.”
|