proxy.htm
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Filed by the
Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the
appropriate box:
x
|
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to Section
240.14a-12
|
ASA
Limited
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement,
if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
|
|
No
fee required.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
Amount Previously Paid: __________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.
__________
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
Filing Party: _____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
Date Filed:
______________________________
|
ASA
LIMITED
11
SUMMER STREET
4TH
FLOOR
BUFFALO,
NY 14209
[ ],
2010
Dear
Shareholder,
You are
cordially invited to attend the Annual General Meeting (the “Meeting”) of
Shareholders of ASA Limited (the “Company”) to be held on March 11,
2010. At the Meeting the Company’s Board of Directors is recommending
that shareholders approve a proposal for the Company, either through a new
wholly-owned subsidiary or directly, to provide investment advisory services to
others. In connection with this proposal, shareholders will be asked
to approve an amendment to the Company’s Memorandum of Association to permit the
Company to provide investment advisory services as well as an amendment to one
of the Company’s fundamental investment policies to permit the Company to
acquire the securities of an investment adviser. At the Meeting, you
will also be asked to consider the election of directors and the ratification
and approval of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending November 30,
2010. During the Meeting, management will present the Company’s
audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 30,
2009.
The Board of Directors has considered
each proposal to be considered at the Meeting and unanimously recommends that
you vote FOR each proposal. Further details of the business to
be transacted at the Meeting can be found in the accompanying Notice of Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders and proxy statement. We invite you to
attend the Meeting in person. Your vote is
important. Whether or not you are able to attend, it is important
that your shares be represented at the Meeting. Accordingly, we ask
that you please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card at your earliest
convenience. As an alternative to using the proxy card to vote, you
may vote by telephone or through the Internet. Please follow the
instructions on the enclosed proxy card.
On behalf
of the Board of Directors and management of the Company, I extend our
appreciation for your continued support.
Sincerely
yours,
Julian
Reid
Chairman
of the Board
ASA
Limited
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROPOSALS FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
While we
strongly encourage you to read the full text of the enclosed Proxy Statement, we
also are providing the following brief overview of the proposals in the
accompanying Proxy Statement in “Question and Answer” format, to help you
understand and vote on these proposals. Your vote is
important. Please vote.
Question: Why
are you sending me this information?
Answer: You
are receiving these materials because on January 22, 2010 you owned shares
of ASA Limited (the “Company”) and, as a result, have a right to vote on
proposals relating to the Company at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
(the “Meeting”) to be held on March 11, 2010.
Question: What
proposals will be acted upon at the Meeting?
Answer: At
the Meeting you will be asked: (1) to elect the Company’s Board of
Directors; (2) to ratify and approve the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending November
30, 2010, and to authorize the Audit and Ethics Committee to set the independent
auditors’ remuneration (3) to approve a proposal for the Company, either
through a new wholly-owned subsidiary or directly, to provide investment
advisory services to others; (4) to amend the Company’s Memorandum of
Association to permit the Company to provide investment advisory services; and
(5) to amend one of the Company’s fundamental investment policies to permit
the Company to acquire the securities of an investment adviser;.
Question: Why
is the Company proposing to provide investment advisory services to
others?
Answer: Following
a strategic review, the Board believes it would be in the best interests of the
Company’s shareholders to broaden the asset base managed by the
Company. The Board believes that this objective may be achieved by
more fully utilizing the Company’s investment personnel and facilities by
providing investment advisory services to others. The Company
proposes to do this by organizing a wholly-owned investment advisory subsidiary
(the “Advisory Subsidiary”) to provide advisory services to
others. The Board and management believe that providing investment
advisory services to others is in the best interests of shareholders because it
allows the Company to use its current resources to seek to increase the
Company’s gross revenues and income thereby enhancing returns for long-term
investors, while at the same time enhancing the Company’s ability to retain and
attract highly qualified investment personnel to manage the Company’s
portfolio.
Question: Does
the Company need to obtain any regulatory relief to create an Advisory
Subsidiary?
Answer: The
Company intends to seek no-action relief from the staff (the “Staff”) of the
Division of Investment Management, a division of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), to permit the Company to organize an
Advisory Subsidiary. If the Staff does not grant the requested relief, the Company may
apply to the Commission for exemptive relief to organize such a
subsidiary. The Company may also determine to directly provide
investment advisory services to others which requires no relief from the Staff
or the Commission. Shareholders are therefore being asked to approve
a proposal for the Company, either through an Advisory Subsidiary or directly,
to provide investment advisory services to others.
Question: How
will the proposed investment advisory business operate?
Answer: If the Company organizes an Advisory
Subsidiary to provide investment advisory services:
|
●
|
It
is expected that the Company will capitalize the Advisory Subsidiary with
an amount of money and assets reasonably necessary to cover Advisory
Subsidiary’s organizational expenses and Advisory Subsidiary will utilize
certain employees and facilities of the Company to provide advisory
services to clients that may include registered investment companies, U.S.
and non-U.S. unregistered investment companies, and non-investment company
clients, such as institutional investors and separate account
clients.
|
|
●
|
All
of the officers and employees of the Company will hold similar positions
as officers and employees of the Advisory Subsidiary. Certain
members of the Board will become members of the Board of Directors of the
Advisory Subsidiary.
|
|
●
|
Net
fee income, if any, generated by the Advisory Subsidiary will be
periodically distributed as dividends to the
Company.
|
If the Company provides investment
advisory services directly:
|
●
|
It
is expected that the Company will utilize certain of its employees and
facilities to provide advisory services to the same types of clients that
the Advisory Subsidiary would
advise.
|
|
●
|
The
day-to-day administration of the Company’s investment advisory services to
others would be the responsibility of the Company’s management, subject to
the oversight of the Board.
|
|
●
|
Fee
income, if any, generated by the Company would flow directly to the
Company.
|
Regardless of whether an Advisory
Subsidiary or the Company provides investment advisory services to others, the
Advisory Subsidiary and/or the Company will institute procedures to ensure that
the purchase and sale of securities for the Company’s investment portfolio and
for each client account managed by the Advisory Subsidiary or the Company are
conducted in a manner designed to treat all accounts fairly.
Question: Why
am I being asked to amend the Company’s Memorandum of Association?
Answer: Currently
the Company’s Memorandum of Association does not include as objects of the
Company “developing, operating, advising or acting as technical consultants to
any other enterprise or business.” This exclusion could be
interpreted to prevent the Company from developing an Advisory Subsidiary or
providing investment advisory services to others. Accordingly, the
Board has adopted a resolution to amend the Company’s Memorandum of Association
to include as objects of the Company “developing, operating, advising or acting
as technical consultants to any other enterprise or business.”
Question: Why
am I being asked to amend the Company’s fundamental investment policies with
respect to acquisition of securities issued by investment advisers?
Answer: Currently
one of the Company’s fundamental investment policies prohibits it from acquiring
any securities issued by investment advisers. In order for the
Company to form an Advisory Subsidiary to provide investment advisory services
to others, it will be necessary to amend this policy.
Question: What
other proposals will be acted upon at the Meeting?
Answer: In
addition to the proposals discussed above you will be asked to re-elect the five
current Directors on the Board and to elect a new Director. The new nominee, if
elected, would be a non-interested (“Independent”) Director, as defined in the
Investment Company Act of 1940, which is one of the federal securities laws
governing the Company. If all nominees are elected by shareholders,
the size of the Board will increase to six Directors, five of whom would be
Independent Directors. You will also be asked to ratify and approve
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year
ending November 30, 2010, and to authorize the Audit and Ethics Committee to set
the independent auditors’ remuneration.
Question: How
does the Board recommend that I vote?
Answer: After
careful consideration, the Board recommends a vote FOR each of the proposals to
be acted upon at the Meeting. Each of these proposals is discussed in
the accompanying Proxy Statement.
Question: How
do I vote my shares?
Answer: Please
indicate your voting instructions on the enclosed proxy card, sign and date the
card, and return the card by mail in the postage-paid envelope
provided. As an alternative to voting the proxy card by mail, you may
vote by telephone, through the Internet or in person. To vote by
telephone, please call the toll-free number listed on the proxy
card. To vote through the Internet, please access the website listed
on the proxy card; note that to vote through the Internet, you will need the
unique “control” number that appears on the enclosed proxy card. If
you will attend the Meeting and vote in person, please let us know by calling
973-377-3535. You will be required to provide valid identification in
order to gain admission.
Question: When
should I return my proxy?
Answer: We
would like to receive your completed, signed and dated proxy as soon as
possible. You may also vote by telephone or through the
Internet. Because your vote is important to us, you may receive a
call from the Company or The Altman Group, the Company’s proxy solicitor,
reminding you to vote.
Question: What
if I have other questions?
Answer: If
you have any questions about any proposal or need assistance voting your shares,
please call: [].
ASA
LIMITED
11
SUMMER STREET
4TH
FLOOR
BUFFALO,
NY 14209
NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
March
11, 2010
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual
General Meeting (the “Meeting”) of Shareholders of ASA Limited (the “Company”)
will be held on March 11, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of
K&L Gates LLP, 599 Lexington Avenue, 32nd
Floor, New York, NY 10022, for the purpose of considering and acting upon the
following business:
|
1.
|
To
elect the Company’s Board of
Directors.
|
|
2.
|
To
ratify and approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2010, and to
authorize the Audit and Ethics Committee to set the independent auditors’
remuneration.
|
|
3.
|
To
approve a proposal for the Company, either through a new wholly-owned
subsidiary or directly, to provide investment advisory services to
others.
|
|
4.
|
To
amend the Company’s Memorandum of Association to permit the Company to
provide investment advisory
services.
|
|
5.
|
To
amend the Company’s fundamental investment policies to permit the Company
to acquire securities issued by an investment advisory
subsidiary.
|
|
6.
|
Such
other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
|
The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR each of the
proposals to be acted on at the Meeting.
During
the Meeting, management will also present the Company’s audited financial
statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009.
The Board
of Directors has fixed the close of business on January 22, 2010, as the
record date for the determination of the shareholders of the Company entitled to
receive notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
By order of the
Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
Paul
K. Wustrack, Jr.
Secretary
|
|
[ ],
2010
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT
NO
MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN
If your
shares are registered in your name, please indicate your voting instructions on
the enclosed proxy card, sign and date the card, and return the card in the
envelope provided before the date of the Meeting. If you sign, date, and return the
proxy card but give no voting instructions, the proxies will vote FOR each
proposal. In order to avoid the additional expense of further
solicitation, we ask your cooperation in mailing your proxy card
promptly.
As an
alternative to using the proxy card to return your proxy, you may vote in person
at the Meeting or you may return your proxy:
· by
touch-tone telephone, with a toll-free call to
[ ];
or
· through
the Internet at
[ ],
by following the instructions on the website.
If you
have any questions regarding the proposals or need assistance returning your
proxy, please contact The Altman Group, the Company’s proxy solicitor, toll-free
at
[ ].
If we do
not receive your voting instructions after our original mailing, you may be
contacted by the Company or by The Altman Group. The Company or The
Altman Group will remind you to appoint a proxy.
If you
hold your shares in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, you
should contact your nominee with your instructions for attendance or voting at
the Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name and you wish to vote in
person at the Meeting, you must request your nominee to provide you with a legal
proxy in order to vote your shares at the Meeting.
____________________________________________
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on March 11,
2010.
The
Proxy Statement and the Annual Report of the Company
for
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009, are available at
www.asaltd.com/proxymaterial.
ASA
LIMITED
11
SUMMER STREET
4TH
FLOOR
BUFFALO,
NY 14209
______________________________
PROXY
STATEMENT
______________________________
ANNUAL
GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
March
11, 2010
SOLICITATION
AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES
The
enclosed proxy card is solicited by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ASA
Limited (the “Company”) for use at the Annual General Meeting (the “Meeting”) of
the Company’s shareholders to be held on March 11, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern
Time, at the offices of K&L Gates LLP, 599 Lexington Avenue, 32nd
Floor, New York, NY 10022. (The Meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof are referred to herein as the “Meeting”.) The
proxy may be revoked by a shareholder at any time prior to its use at the
Meeting by an instrument in writing delivered to the Secretary, c/o ASA Limited,
11 Summer Street, 4th
Floor, Buffalo, NY 14209 or delivered to him at the Meeting.
The
expense of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing the proxy statement,
proxy card and any other material used for the solicitation of proxies by the
Board will be paid by the Company. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by
use of the mails, directors and officers of the Company may solicit proxies by
telephone, electronic communications or personal contact, for which they will
not receive any additional compensation. The Company has retained The Altman
Group, 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 916, New York, NY 10165 to assist in the
solicitation of proxies. Such solicitation will primarily be by mail and
telephone. The costs of the solicitation are estimated at approximately
$[ ]. The Altman Group will
be reimbursed for out-of-pocket costs in connection with the solicitation. The
Company will also reimburse brokers, nominees and fiduciaries that are
registered owners of shares of the Company for the out-of-pocket and clerical
expenses of transmitting copies of the proxy materials to the beneficial owners
of such shares. The approximate mailing date of this proxy statement and the
proxy card will be [ ], 2010.
The
Annual Report of the Company for the year ended November 30, 2009 is being
mailed to all shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Meeting. If you have not received a copy of the Annual Report and
would like to receive a copy free of charge, please contact Paul K.
Wustrack, Jr., Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer, at ASA Limited, 11 Summer
Street, 4th
Floor, Buffalo, New York 14209 or by telephone at (800) 432-3378. You
may also view the Annual Report on the Company’s website at
www.asaltd.com/proxymaterial.
On
November 19, 2004, ASA Limited, a South African public limited liability company
and the predecessor company to the Company (“ASA South Africa”), was reorganized
into the Company, a Bermuda exempted limited liability
company. Certain information in this proxy statement relates to ASA
South Africa as the predecessor company.
VOTING
AT THE MEETING
Only registered shareholders at the
close of business on January 22, 2010 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled
to vote. There are 6,480,000 Common Shares of the Company outstanding, each of
which entitles the holder to one vote. Each valid proxy received at or before
the Meeting will be voted at the Meeting in accordance with the instructions on
the proxy card. If a
shareholder has signed a proxy card but no instructions are indicated, the named
proxies will vote FOR each of the following proposals: (1) to elect
as directors each of the nominees listed on the proxy card; (2) to ratify and
approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal
year ending November 30, 2010, and to authorize the Audit and Ethics Committee
to set the independent auditors’ remuneration; (3) to approve a proposal for the
Company, either through a new wholly-owned subsidiary or directly, to provide
investment advisory services to others; (4) to amend the Company’s Memorandum of
Association to permit the Company to provide investment advisory services to
others; (5) to amend the Company’s fundamental investment policies to permit the
Company to acquire the securities of an investment adviser; and (6) in their
discretion, upon such other matters as may properly come before the
Meeting.
Shareholders may return their proxies
by mail, by touch-tone telephone, or through the Internet, or may vote in person
at the Meeting. If your shares are registered in your name, we encourage you to
return your proxy by telephone by calling toll free [ ] or, if you have Internet access,
through the Internet at
[ ]. When you return your proxy
by telephone or through the Internet, your instructions are recorded immediately
and there is no risk that postal delays will cause your proxy to arrive late and
therefore not be counted. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a
broker, bank or other nominee, your nominee may allow you to provide voting
instructions by telephone or through the Internet. Please consult the materials
you receive from your nominee prior to returning your proxy by telephone or
through the Internet. Shareholders who plan on attending the Meeting
and vote in person, should call 973-377-3535. Shareholders who plan
on attending the Meeting will be required to provide valid identification in
order to gain admission.
If you
have any questions regarding the proposals or need assistance returning your
proxy, please contact our proxy solicitor, The Altman Group, toll-free at [ ].
SHARE
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
As of the Record Date, the Company is
not aware of any person or “group” (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) owning
beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares, except as
follows:
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner
|
Amount
and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percentage
of
Outstanding Shares
|
Lazard
Asset Management LLC
30
Rockefeller Plaza
New
York, NY 10112
|
[1,221,279(1)]
|
[18.9%]
|
Summit
Global Management, Inc.
9171
Towne Center Drive
San
Diego, CA 92122
|
[331,280(2)]
|
[5.1%]
|
WS
Management, LLP
225
Water Street, Suite 1987
Jacksonville,
FL 32202
|
[348,400(3)]
|
[5.4%]
|
(1) The above information is
based solely on the Form 13F filed by Lazard Asset Management LLC on November 9,
2009, according to which Lazard Asset Management LLC has sole voting and
investment power over the shares shown opposite its name.
(2) The
above information is based solely on the Form 13F filed by Summit Global
Management, Inc. on October 27, 2009, according to which Summit Global
Management, Inc. has sole voting and investment power over the shares shown
opposite its name.
(3) The
above information is based solely on the Form 13F filed by WS Management, LLP on
November 12, 2009, according to which WS Management, LLP has sole voting and
investment power over the shares shown opposite its name.
On
September 1, 2009, the Company commenced a tender offer to purchase up to
720,000 of its Common Shares, representing 10% of its issued and outstanding
shares. Because the number of shares tendered exceeded 720,000
shares, the Company purchased shares duly tendered on a pro rata basis in
accordance with the number of shares duly tendered by each
shareholder. The Company paid $76.11 per share, the amount equal to
98% of $77.66, the net asset value per share as determined by the Company at the
close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on October 2, 2009, the
expiration date of the tender offer. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, at
the time of the tender offer Lazard Asset Management LLC (“Lazard”) beneficially
owned more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares. Based
on information from a source at Lazard, Lazard sold [] Common Shares in
connection with the tender offer and received proceeds of approximately
$[]. Mr. Andrew Pegge, a Director of the Company, is a Director
and Chief Executive Officer of Laxey Partners Limited (“Laxey
Partners”). Laxey Partners as the manager or adviser of certain
entities controlled by it sold 13,547 Common Shares in connection with the
tender offer and received proceeds of approximately $1,031,000.
QUORUM
AND REQUIRED VOTING
One-third
(1/3) of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares present in person or by proxy
and entitled to vote constitutes a quorum at the Meeting. If, within five
minutes from the time scheduled for the Meeting, a quorum of shareholders is not
present, the Meeting shall stand adjourned until such other day, time and place
as the chairman of the Meeting may determine.
Assuming
that a quorum is present at each Meeting, approval of each Proposal to be acted
upon at the Meeting, except Proposal 5 below, requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at the Meeting, whether in person or by
proxy.
Assuming
that a quorum is present at the Meeting, approval of Proposal 5 below requires
the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding
Common Shares, which under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
“1940 Act”) means the vote of: (1) more than 50% of the outstanding Common
Shares of the Company; or (2) 67% or more of the Common Shares of the Company
present at the Meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding
Common Shares are present or represented by proxy at the Meeting, whichever is
less.
Abstentions
and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers,
banks or other nominees as to which (i) instructions have not been received from
the beneficial owner or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker, bank or
nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) will be
counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, but will be
disregarded in determining the “votes cast” on a proposal. Therefore,
abstentions and “broker non-votes” will have no effect on the vote with respect
to Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 below but will have the effect of a vote against
Proposal 5.
PROPOSAL 1: TO
ELECT THE COMPANY’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
At its
December 8, 2009 meeting, the Board nominated the individuals listed below for
election as Directors, each to hold office as directors of the Company until the
next Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders. Five
of the nominees (David J. Christensen, Phillip Goldstein, Andrew Pegge,
Robert A. Pilkington and Julian Reid) currently serve as Directors of the
Company. At the meeting, the Board determined to increase the size of
the Board to six directors effective the date of the Meeting and, upon the
recommendation of the Nominating Committee, nominated Mr. Michael L. Mead,
who has extensive investment management experience, for election as a
Director. Mr. Mead was recommended to the Nominating Committee by a
shareholder of the Company. Each nominee (other than Mr. Mead) was
elected to serve as a director of the Company at the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders held on February 17, 2009. Each nominee has consented to
being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. In the event that
any of the nominees is unable or declines to serve as a director, an event that
management does not anticipate, proxies may be voted at the Meeting for the
election of another person in his stead or the Board may reduce the number of
directors as provided in the Company’s Bye-Laws. The persons named as
proxies on the enclosed proxy card relating to the Meeting will vote FOR the
election of the nominees listed below unless the shareholder specifically
indicates on his or her proxy card a desire to vote against any
nominee.
The
following is a list of each nominee, his age, address, principal occupation and
present positions, including any affiliations with the Company, the length of
service with the Company and other directorships held. Unless
otherwise noted, each nominee has engaged in the principal occupation listed in
the following table for five years or more.
Name,
Address (1)
and
Age
|
Position
Held, Term of Office (2) and Length
of
Time Served
|
Principal
Occupation During the
Past
Five
Years
|
Other
Directorships
|
Interested
Nominee*:
|
|
|
|
David
J. Christensen, 47
|
Director
since November 2008; Chief Investment Officer and Chief Executive Officer
since February 2009
|
Vice
President – Investments from May 2007 to February, 2009; Vice President,
Corporate Development of Gabriel Resources Ltd. 2006 to 2008; independent
financial consultant from 2003 to 2006; Director of Fundamental Equity
Research for Credit Suisse First Boston from 2002 to 2003.
|
Director
of Hecla Mining Company (precious metals mining
company).
|
Independent
Nominees**:
|
|
|
|
Phillip
Goldstein, 64
|
Director
since April 2008.
|
Self-employed
investment advisor since 1992; principal of the general partner of six
private investment partnerships in the Bulldog Investors group of
funds.
|
Director
of Brantley Capital Corporation; Mexico Equity and Income Fund; and
Special Opportunities Fund, Inc.
|
Andrew
Pegge, 46
|
Deputy
Chairman (non-executive), since February 2009; Director since May
2008.
|
Director
and Chief Executive Officer of Laxey Partners Limited (global active value
fund manager) since 1999.
|
None
|
Name,
Address (1)
and
Age
|
Position
Held, Term of Office (2) and Length
of
Time Served
|
Principal
Occupation During the
Past
Five
Years
|
Other
Directorships
|
Robert
A.
Pilkington,
64
|
Director
since 2004 (ASA South Africa from 1979 to 2005).
|
Investment
banker and Managing Director of UBS Securities LLC and predecessor
companies since 1985.
|
Director
of Avocet Mining PLC (gold mining company).
|
Julian
Reid, 65
|
Chairman
(non-executive) since February 2009; Director since April
2008.
|
Director
of JF China Region Fund, Inc. (since 1997); Director and Chairman of 3a
Funds Group (since 1998); Director (since 2004) and Chairman (since 2005)
of The Korea Fund, Inc.; Director and Chairman of Prosperity Voskhod Fund
Ltd. (since 2006); Director and Chairman of Morgan’s Walk Properties Ltd.
(2002-2006) (residential property owner/ manager); President (2004),
Director (1994-2004) and Chairman (1998-2004) of Saffron Fund,
Inc.
|
None
|
Michael
L. Mead, 57
|
None
|
Held
investment research and portfolio management positions from 1997 to his
retirement in 2008 (Director-Global Equities from 2004 to 2008) with the
Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investment Department, which manages the
Institute’s endowment.
|
None
|
_______________________
(1)
|
For
the purposes of his position as a director of the Company, the address for
each director is c/o LGN Group, LLC, P.O. Box 269, Florham Park, NJ
07932.
|
(2) Each
director of the Company will serve as such until the next Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders.
|
*
|
An
“interested person” of the Company, as such term is defined in the 1940
Act, by reason of being an officer of the
Company.
|
|
**
|
Not
an “interested person” of the
Company.
|
Required Vote: The election of
directors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Meeting.
The Directors unanimously recommend
that you vote FOR proposal 1.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The
current executive officers of the Company are David J. Christensen, whose
biographical information is set forth above; Lawrence G. Nardolillo (67),
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer since February 2009; and Paul K. Wustrack,
Jr. (66), Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer since 2004. During
the past five years, Mr. Nardolillo has been the owner-member of LGN Group, LLC,
which provides certain administrative and shareholder services to the
Company. Fees paid to LGN Group, Inc. since Mr. Nardolillo’s
appointment as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer through November 30,
2009 were $461,250. Mr. Nardolillo’s address is c/o LGN Group, LLC,
140 Columbia Turnpike, 2nd
Floor, Florham Park, NJ 07932. During the past five years,
Mr. Wustrack served as Assistant U.S. Secretary of ASA South Africa from 2002 to
2005, and as Chief Compliance Officer of ASA South Africa from 2004 to 2005. Mr.
Wustrack’s address is c/o ASA Limited, 11 Summer Street, 4th
Floor, Buffalo, NY 14209.
DIRECTOR/OFFICER
COMPENSATION
Each director receives an annual
retainer fee of $20,000 for his services as a director, except the Chairman of
the Board, who receives an additional annual fee of $5,000. Each
director receives a fee of $4,000 for attendance at each in-person directors
meeting and $1,000 for attendance at each telephonic directors
meeting. The Chairman of the Audit and Ethics Committee receives an
annual fee of $2,000 for acting in that capacity and the Chairmen of the
Compensation and Nominating Committees each receives an annual fee of $500 for
acting in those capacities. A director may receive additional fees
for providing additional services as a director at the request of the
Board. A director whose first election to the Board was prior to
January 1, 2008 qualifies to receive retirement benefits if he has served
the Company or its predecessor, ASA South Africa, for at least twelve years
prior to retirement. The annual retirement benefit is equal to 75% of
the annual retainer fee paid to active directors, as it may be increased from
time to time. A director retiring after attaining the age of 70 is
entitled to such retirement benefit for life; a director retiring after
attaining such age is entitled to such retirement for the lesser of life or the
number of years he served as a director.
A summary of the compensation and
benefits for the directors of the Company and the officers of the Company for
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009 is shown below:
Name
of Person
&
Position
|
Aggregate
Compensation
from
Company
|
Pension
or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of Company
Expenses
|
Estimated
Annual Benefits Upon
Retirement (1)
|
Total
Compensation From Company
Paid to
Director
|
Interested
Director:
|
|
|
|
|
David
J. Christensen, Director and President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Investment Officer
|
$763,170(1)
|
--
|
None
|
$34,000
|
Independent
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip
Goldstein,
Director
|
$37,250
|
--
|
None
|
$37,250
|
Andrew
Pegge,
Director
|
$40,000
|
--
|
None
|
$40,000
|
Robert
A. Pilkington,
Director
|
$36,250
|
--
|
$15,000
|
$36,250
|
Julian
Reid,
Director
and Deputy Chairman (non-executive)
|
$78,500(1)
|
--
|
None
|
$78,500
|
Other
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
G. Nardolillo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
None(2)
|
--
|
--
|
N/A
|
Paul
K. Wustrack, Jr.,
Secretary
and Chief Compliance Officer
|
$297,917(3)
|
--
|
--
|
N/A
|
_______________________
(1)
|
The
amount shown for Mr. Reid includes additional fees paid to Mr. Reid for
providing, at the request of the Board, additional services as a
director.
|
(2)
|
Pursuant
to the Amended and Restated Services Agreement between the Company and LGN
Group, LLC, LGN Group, LLC provides Mr. Nardolillo to serve as Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company.
|
(3)
|
In
addition to the amount shown, Mr. Wustrack received an allowance of
$45,542 for office expenses (including office rental, cleaning, computer
internet connection, basic phone service and secretarial support) that he
incurs in connection with his services to the Company. The allowance was
estimated based on an annual budget for these
expenses.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth as of the Record Date certain information regarding
the beneficial ownership of Common Shares of the Company by each director and
each nominee for election as director, each executive officer, and all
directors, nominees and all executive officers as a group, including the dollar
range of the value of equity securities beneficially owned by each director and
director nominee.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount
and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
(1)
|
Percentage
of Outstanding Shares
|
Aggregate
Dollar Range of Share Ownership
(2)
|
Interested
Director:
|
|
|
|
David
J. Christensen
|
200
|
*
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Directors:
|
|
|
|
Phillip
Goldstein
|
300
|
*
|
$10,001-$50,000
|
Andrew
Pegge
|
0
|
0.00%
|
None
|
Robert
A. Pilkington
|
3,000
|
*
|
Over
$100,000
|
Julian
Reid
|
100
|
*
|
$1-$10,000
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Nominee:
|
|
|
|
Michael
L. Mead
|
0
|
0.00%
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Officers:
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
G. Nardolillo
|
100
|
*
|
N/A
|
Paul
K. Wustrack, Jr.
|
10
|
*
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a group:
|
3710
|
*
|
N/A
|
_______________________
(1)
|
Each
individual has sole voting and investment power over the shares shown
opposite his name.
|
(2)
|
Valuation
as of the Record Date.
|
*
|
The
Common Shares shown for this individual or group constituted less than 1%
of the Company’s outstanding Common
Shares.
|
BOARD
COMMITTEES
The Board
has an Audit and Ethics Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating
Committee.
Audit
and Ethics Committee
The
current members of the Audit and Ethics Committee are Messrs. Pegge (Chairman),
Goldstein and Reid, each of whom is an Independent Director (and an independent
director as that term is defined in the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange). The Audit and Ethics Committee acts pursuant to a written
charter, a current copy of which is available on the Company’s website at
www.asaltd.com . The responsibilities of the Audit and Ethics
Committee include overseeing (i) the Company’s accounting and financial
reporting policies and practices, (ii) the Company’s internal controls and
procedures, (iii) the integrity, quality and objectivity of the Company’s
financial statements and the audit thereof, and (iv) the Company’s compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit and Ethics
Committee is directly responsible for the selection (subject to ratification by
a majority of the Independent Directors and by the shareholders), compensation,
oversight and, when appropriate, termination of the Company’s independent
auditors. Attached as Appendix A is a copy of the Company’s Audit and
Ethics Committee Report with respect to the Company’s audited financial
statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009.
Compensation
Committee
The
current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Goldstein (Chairman),
Pegge, Pilkington and Reid, each of whom is an Independent Director. The primary
function of the
Compensation
Committee is to make recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of
the directors and officers of the Company.
Nominating
Committee
The
current members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Pilkington (Chairman),
Goldstein, Pegge and Reid, each of whom is an Independent
Director. The Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying
qualified candidates for the Board and the committees of the
Board. The Nominating Committee acts pursuant to a written charter, a
current copy of which is available on the Company’s website at www.asaltd.com.
The responsibilities of the Nominating Committee include (i) considering and
evaluating the structure, composition and membership of the Board and each of
its committees, (ii) evaluating and recommending the persons to be nominated by
the Board for election as directors at the next Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders and to fill vacancies on the Board as necessary, and (iii)
evaluating and recommending directors to serve as members of the committees of
the Board.
INFORMATION
REGARDING THE COMPANY’S PROCESS FOR NOMINATING
DIRECTOR
CANDIDATES
The
Nominating Committee will recommend to the Board candidates for new or vacant
Board positions based on its evaluation of which potential candidates are most
qualified to serve and protect the interests of the Company’s shareholders and
to promote the effective operations of the Board. In considering director
candidates, the Nominating Committee may take into account a variety of factors,
including whether the candidates (i) are of the highest character and integrity;
(ii) have distinguished records in their primary careers; (iii) have substantial
experience and breadth of knowledge which is of relevance to the Company,
particularly relating to gold and other precious minerals, finance, securities
law, the workings of the securities markets, or investment management; (iv) have
sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Company in order to
fulfill their duties and responsibilities, including service on Board
committees; (v) are committed to working collaboratively with other members of
the Board in promoting the best long-term interests of shareholders; (vi)
qualify as Independent Directors; and (vii) are free of any conflicts of
interest that would interfere with the proper performance of their duties as
directors. Different substantive areas may assume greater or lesser significance
at particular times, in light of the Board’s present composition and the
Nominating Committee’s (or the Board’s) perceptions about future issues and
needs.
The
Committee considers candidates from any source deemed appropriate by the
Committee, including: (a) the Company’s current directors, (b) the Company’s
officers, and (c) the Company’s shareholders. The Committee will not consider
self-nominated candidates. The Committee may, but is not required to, retain a
third party search firm to identify potential candidates.
The
Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders on the
basis of the same criteria used to consider and evaluate candidates recommended
by other sources. Shareholders may send resumes of recommended persons to the
Chairman – Nominating Committee of ASA Limited, c/o LGN Group, LLC, P.O. Box
269, Florham Park, NJ 07932. The shareholder recommendation must be received at
the above address no later than
[ ],
2010. The shareholder recommendation must be accompanied by all information
relating to such candidate that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of
proxies for the election of directors. In addition, the shareholder
recommendation must be accompanied by the written consent of the candidate to
stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the
shareholders.
DIRECTOR ATTENDANCE AT
MEETINGS
During
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009 there were eight meetings of the Board,
four meetings of the Audit and Ethics Committee, two meetings of the
Compensation Committee, four meetings of the Ethics Committee, and no meetings
of the Nominating Committee. Each director attended 75% or more of
the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he served.
Although
the Company does not have a policy on director attendance at the Annual General
Meetings of Shareholders, directors are encouraged to attend. The 2009 Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders was attended by all of the Company’s current
directors.
SHAREHOLDER
COMMUNICATIONS
Shareholders
may send written communications to the Company’s Board or to an individual
director by mailing such correspondence to the Board or the individual director,
as the case may be,
c/o LGN
Group, LLC, P.O. Box 269, Florham Park, NJ 07932 (addressed to the Company).
Such communications must be signed by the shareholder and identify the number of
shares held by the shareholder. Properly submitted shareholder communications
will, as appropriate, be forwarded to the entire Board or to the individual
director. Any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the
Exchange Act must also meet all the requirements of Rule 14a-8. See “Shareholder
Proposals” below. In addition, shareholders may communicate directly
with the Chairman of the Board by email at
julianreid@btopenworld.com.
COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act and Section 30(h) of the 1940 Act require the
Company’s directors, officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10
percent of the Company’s shares to file reports of ownership of the Company’s
shares and changes in such ownership on Forms 3, 4, and 5 with the Commission.
Such persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies
of all such filings. Based solely upon a review of the copies of such
forms furnished and except as noted below, the Company does not know of any
director, officer or person who beneficially owns more than 10 percent of the
Company’s shares who, during the Company’s last fiscal year, failed to file on a
timely basis the required reports. Mr. Pegge did not timely
report a change in ownership on two Form 4 filings and Mr. Nardolillo filed
a late Form 3.
PROPOSAL
2: RATIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS AND
AUTHORIZATION OF THE AUDIT AND ETHICS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD TO SET THE
AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION
In
accordance with Section 89 of the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, the Company’s
shareholders have the authority to appoint the Company’s independent auditors
and to authorize the Audit and Ethics Committee of the Board to set the
auditors’ remuneration. The Audit and Ethics Committee has nominated Ernst &
Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) New York, NY, an independent registered public
accounting firm, to serve as the Company’s independent auditors to audit the
accounts of the Company for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2010. The Board,
including a majority of Independent Directors, has ratified their nomination and
has directed that their selection be submitted to the Company’s shareholders for
ratification and approval of appointment.
In the
opinion of the Audit and Ethics Committee, the services provided by Ernst &
Young are compatible with maintaining the independence of the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young has informed
the Company that, in its professional judgment, it is not aware of any
relationships between Ernst & Young and the Company that may reasonably be
thought to bear on its independence.
A
representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the Meeting to
respond to appropriate questions and will be given the opportunity to make a
statement if he or she desires to do so.
Audit
and Non-Audit Fees
Aggregate
fees billed by Ernst & Young for professional services rendered to the
Company for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008 are
set forth below.
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
Audit
Fees
|
$99,000
|
|
$94,000
|
Audit-Related
Fees
|
-0-
|
|
-0-
|
Tax
Fees
|
5,775
|
|
5,500
|
All
Other Fees
|
-0-
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$104,775
|
|
$99,500
|
Audit Fees include the
aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the independent
auditors for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review
of the semi-annual financial statements and services rendered in connection with
statutory or regulatory filings, including the annual and semi-annual
reports.
Audit-Related Fees include
the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by the independent
auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of the financial statements.
Tax Fees include the
aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the independent
auditors in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. The
figure for 2008 includes fees billed for U.S. tax advisory
services.
All Other Fees include the
aggregate non-audit fees not disclosed above that were billed for projects and
services provided by the independent auditors.
The
aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for non-audit services rendered to
the Company for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008
were $5,775 and $5,500, respectively.
Policy
on Audit and Ethics Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of
Independent Auditors
The Audit
and Ethics Committee of the Company has the sole authority to pre-approve all
audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors, subject
to the de minimis
exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)B of the
Exchange Act which are approved by the Committee prior to the completion of the
audit. During the fiscal year ended November 30, 2008, there were no services
included in Audit Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees that were approved
by the Audit and Ethics Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception provided
in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. Any individual project
that does not exceed $25,000 may be pre-approved by the chair of the Audit and
Ethics
Committee.
Any such pre-approval by the chair of the Audit and Ethics Committee must be
presented to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Any proposed
services exceeding that cost level requires specific pre-approval by the Audit
and Ethics Committee. Pre-approval of audit and non-audit services shall not be
required if the engagement to render the services is entered into pursuant to
pre-approved
policies and procedures established by the Audit and Ethics Committee, provided
the Committee is informed of each such service. The Audit and Ethics Committee
has not established such policies and procedures.
Required Vote: The
ratification and approval of the appointment of the Company’s independent
auditors and the authorization for the Audit and Ethics Committee to set the
auditors’ remuneration requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast at the Meeting.
The
Directors unanimously recommend that you vote FOR proposal 2.
PROPOSAL 3: TO
APPROVE A PROPOSAL FOR THE COMPANY, EITHER THROUGH A
NEW
WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OR DIRECTLY, TO PROVIDE INVESTMENT
ADVISORY
SERVICES TO OTHERS.
As
shareholders may recall, the Company initiated its tender offer program in 2008
to address concerns regarding the discount to net asset value at which the
Company’s shares were trading. As a result of the tender offer
program, the Company’s net assets have declined very significantly in spite of a
strong bull market in gold related investments and the Company’s good investment
results during the past year. Following a strategic review, the Board
believes it would be in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders to
broaden the asset base managed by the Company. The Board believes
that this objective may be achieved by more fully utilizing the Company’s
investment personnel and facilities by providing investment advisory services to
others.1 The Company proposes to do this by
organizing a wholly-owned investment advisory subsidiary (the “Advisory
Subsidiary”). The Board and management believe that providing
investment advisory services to others is in the best interests of shareholders
because it allows the Company to use its current resources to seek to increase
the Company’s gross revenues and income thereby enhancing returns for long-term
investors, while at the same time enhancing the Company’s ability to retain and
attract highly qualified investment personnel to manage the Company’s
portfolio.
To this
end, the Company intends to submit a request to the staff (the “Staff”) of the
Division of Investment Management, a division of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Commission”) for no-action relief under Section 12(d)(3) of the
1940 Act to permit the Company to establish an Advisory
Subsidiary. If the Staff declines to grant no-action relief, the
Company may seek exemptive relief from the Commission to allow it to establish
an Advisory Subsidiary. The Company may also determine to directly
provide investment advisory services to others which requires no relief from the
Staff or the Commission.
If the
Company forms an Advisory Subsidiary it will capitalize such subsidiary with an
amount of money and assets reasonably necessary to cover the Advisory
Subsidiary’s organizational expenses and Advisory Subsidiary will utilize
certain employees and facilities of the Company. Operating expenses
attributable to the Advisory Subsidiary will be borne by it. The
Advisory Subsidiary will solicit clients that may include registered investment
companies, U.S. and non-U.S. unregistered investment companies, and
non-investment company clients, such as institutional investors and separate
account clients (“Clients”). The Advisory Subsidiary may or may not
register as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the
“Advisers Act”). It is expected that, initially, all of the other
officers and employees of the Company will hold similar positions as officers
and employees of the Advisory Subsidiary. Certain members of the
Board will become members of the Board of Directors of the Advisory
Subsidiary. Net fee income generated by the Advisory Subsidiary, if
any, will be periodically distributed in the form of dividends to the
Company. These dividend payments will provide income to defray
operating expenses of the Company and to augment dividends to the Company’s
shareholders. No assurance can be provided that advisory fees to be
generated by the Advisory Subsidiary will exceed the Advisory Subsidiary’s
operating expenses. The Advisory Subsidiary will not
provide
investment advisory services to the Company and the Company will continue to
be internally managed. The
Board will review at least annually the investment advisory business of the
Advisory Subsidiary in order to determine whether or not such business should be
continued and whether or not the benefits derived by the Company from the
Advisory Subsidiary’s business warrant the Company’s continued ownership of the
Advisory Subsidiary and, if applicable, approve at least annually such
continuation.
If the
Company determines to provide investment advisory services directly, it is
expected that the Company will utilize certain of its employees and facilities
to provide advisory services to the same types of Clients that the Advisory
Subsidiary may service. The day-to-day administration of the
Company’s investment advisory services to Clients would be the responsibility of
the Company’s management, including Mr. Christensen, subject to the oversight of
the Board. The Company may or may not register as an investment
adviser under the Advisers Act.
Clients
to be serviced by the Advisory Subsidiary or the Company may have investment
objectives and strategies that are similar to those of the
Company. Consequently, certain securities which the Company buys and
sells may also be bought and sold for Client accounts managed by the Advisory
Subsidiary or the Company. In order to mitigate any potential
conflicts of interest, the Advisory Subsidiary or the Company will institute
procedures to ensure that the purchase and sale of securities for the Company’s
investment portfolio and for each Client account managed by the Advisory
Subsidiary or the Company are conducted in a manner designed to treat all
accounts fairly and not give priority to either the Company’s investment
portfolio or to any Client account. This would be accomplished by
fixing in advance the number of shares of each security to be bought or sold for
all accounts and the number of shares for each account. Purchases and
sales would then be allocated daily in the proportions determined in this
way. This allocation policy may at times make it somewhat more
difficult, in the case of securities having limited liquidity, for the Company
to acquire or dispose of securities. Also, in a rising market it may
result in the Company paying more for some of the shares that it desires to
purchase and in a declining market it may result in the Company receiving less
for some of the shares it desires to sell. The possibly unfavorable
results for the Company may be minimized by the policy of investing principally
in securities that have a broad market and by the Company’s relatively low
turnover rate. In addition, the Company does not anticipate
purchasing securities issued by any Clients advised by the Advisory Subsidiary
or the Company or selling or purchasing securities to or from such
Clients.
The
investment management business is very competitive and the Company does not know
what, if any, Clients the Advisory Subsidiary or the Company will be able to
procure or the amount of income the Advisory Subsidiary or the Company may be
able to generate by providing investment advisory services. There may
be a risk that the added responsibility placed on the Company’s current officers
and employees may overburden the Company’s resources as Client accounts grow in
number and size. The Board believes that this risk may be mitigated
by expansion of the Advisory Subsidiary’s or Company’s staff as the investment
advisory business grows. There may also be certain additional risks
if the Company provides investment advisory services directly, including the
risk of litigation against the Company (in its role as an investment adviser)
and the greater regulatory burdens and operating complexities of operating as
both an investment company and an investment adviser.
Required Vote: Approval of an
Advisory Subsidiary or the Company providing investment advisory services to
others requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Meeting.
The
Directors unanimously recommend that you vote FOR proposal 3.
PROPOSAL
4: TO AMEND THE COMPANY’S MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION TO PERMIT THE
COMPANY TO PROVIDE INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES
Currently,
Paragraph 6 of the Company’s Memorandum of Association provides as
follows:
The
objects for which the Company is formed and incorporated are: As set
forth in paragraphs (b) to (n) and (p) to (u) inclusive of the Second Schedule
of the Companies Act 1981.
Paragraph
(o) of the Second Schedule of the Companies Act 1981, which is not included in
Paragraph 6 of the Company’s Memorandum of Association, includes the following
objects: “developing, operating, advising or acting as consultants to any other
enterprise or business.”
Paragraph
(o) could be interpreted to include developing an investment advisory subsidiary
or providing investment advisory services to others. Given this
possible interpretation, the Board has adopted a resolution to amend Paragraph 6
of the Company’s Memorandum of Association to include Paragraph (o) of the
Second Schedule of the Companies Act of 1981.
Paragraph
6 of the Memorandum of Association of the Company would be amended as
follows:
The
objects for which the Company is formed and incorporated are: As set
forth in paragraphs (b) through (u) inclusive of the Second Schedule to the
Companies Act of 1981.
Required Vote: The amendment
to the Company’s Memorandum of Association requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at the Meeting.
The
Directors unanimously recommend that you vote FOR proposal 4.
PROPOSAL 5: TO
AMEND THE COMPANY’S FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICIES TO PERMIT THE COMPANY TO
ACQUIRE SECURITIES ISSUED BY AN INVESTMENT ADVISORY SUBSIDIARY.
Currently
the Company has a fundamental investment policy that prohibits it from acquiring
any securities issued by investment advisers. In order for the
Company to form an Advisory Subsidiary to provide investment advisory services
to others, it will be necessary to amend this fundamental investment
policy. The Company’s fundamental investment policy with respect to
“Purchase of Securities Issued by Brokers, Dealers, Underwriters, Investment
Advisers and Insurance Companies” is proposed to be amended as
follows:
Purchase of Securities
Issued by Brokers, Dealers, Underwriters, Investment Advisers and Insurance
Companies. It is the policy of the Company not to purchase or
otherwise acquire any securities issued by brokers, dealers, underwriters,
investment advisers or insurance companies except (i) securities of an
investment advisory subsidiary organized by the Company, and (ii), within the
limitations imposed by the 1940 Act, any securities issued by insurance
companies.
Required Vote: The amendment
of the Company’s fundamental investment policy with respect to acquisition of
securities issued by investment advisers requires the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares, which under
the 1940 Act means the vote of: (1) more than 50% of the outstanding Common
Shares of the Company; or (2) 67% or more of the Common Shares of the Company
present at the Meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding
Common Shares are present or represented by proxy at the Meeting, whichever is
less.
The
Directors unanimously recommend that you vote FOR proposal 5.
PRESENTATION
OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In
accordance with Section 84 of the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, the Company’s
audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009 will be
presented at the Meeting. These statements have been approved by the Company’s
Board. There is no requirement under Bermuda law that such statements be
approved by the shareholders, and no such approval will be sought at this
Meeting.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
The
principal executive office of the Company is located at 11 Summer Street, 4th
Floor, Buffalo, NY 14209. The Company does not have an outside
investment adviser.
LGN
Group, LLC provides certain administrative and shareholder services to the
Company. LGN Group, LLC is located at 140 Columbia Turnpike, 2nd
Floor, Florham Park, NJ 07932.
Kaufman
Rossin Fund Services, LLC, located at 2699 South Bayshore Drive, 9th
Floor, Miami, FL 33133, provides accounting services to the
Company.
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS
In order
for a shareholder proposal to be included in the Company’s proxy statement and
proxy card for the 2011 Annual General Meeting the proposal must be received no
later than
[ ],
2010.
Under
Rule 14a-4 of the Exchange Act, if a shareholder wishes to present a proposal
for consideration at the 2011 Annual General Meeting without inclusion of such
proposal in the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card, the notice of such
proposal must be received no later than
[ ], 2010. If notice of such
proposal is not received by
[ ],
2010, management proxies may use their discretionary authority to vote on such
proposal. Bermuda law provides that only registered shareholders holding not
less than 5% of the total voting rights in the Company or 100 registered
shareholders together may require a proposal to be submitted to an annual
general meeting. Generally, notice of such a proposal must be deposited at the
registered office of the Company (ASA Limited, Canon’s Court, 22 Victoria
Street, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda) no less than six weeks before the date of the
meeting, unless the meeting is subsequently called for a date six weeks or less
after the notice has been deposited.
OTHER
MATTERS
The
management of the Company knows of no other business that will be presented for
consideration at the Meeting, but should any other matters requiring a vote of
shareholders arise, the persons named as proxies will vote thereon in accordance
with their best judgment.
ASA
Limited
Julian
Reid
Chairman
of the Board
[ ],
2010
APPENDIX
A
AUDIT
AND ETHICS COMMITTEE REPORT
ASA
LIMITED
The Audit
and Ethics Committee of the Board of Directors of ASA Limited (the “Company”)
was created to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of matters
relating to accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial
reporting, the integrity, quality and objectivity of the Company’s financial
statements and the independent audit thereof, the Company’s independent
auditors, and certain legal and regulatory compliance. Management is responsible
for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial
statements and for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting
principles and policies and internal controls and procedures designed to ensure
compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The
independent auditors are responsible for planning and carrying out a proper
audit. Members of the Audit and Ethics Committee rely without independent
verification on the information provided and the representations made to them by
management and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent
auditors.
The Audit
and Ethics Committee has reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2009. In conjunction with its review, the
Audit and Ethics Committee has met with the management of the Company to discuss
the audited financial statements. In addition, the Audit and Ethics Committee
has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, the matters required pursuant to
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional
Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, and has received the written disclosures and the
letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s
communications with the Audit and Ethics Committee concerning independence. The
Audit and Ethics Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the
independence of Ernst & Young LLP.
Based
upon this review and related discussions, and subject to the limitation on the
role and responsibilities of the Audit and Ethics Committee set forth in the
Audit and Ethics Committee Charter, the Audit and Ethics Committee recommended
to the Company’s Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be
included in the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended November 30,
2009.
This
report has been approved by all of the members of the Audit and Ethics Committee
(whose names are listed below), each of whom has been determined to be
independent as defined in the New York Stock Exchange’s listing
standards.
[ ],
2010
Andrew
Pegge (Chairman)
Phillip
Goldstein
Julian
Reid
-16-
ASA
LIMITED
11
Summer Street
4th
Floor
Buffalo,
NY
ANNUAL
GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MARCH 11, 2010
The undersigned, revoking previous proxies, hereby appoint(s)
______________ and ________________, or any one of them, as attorneys and
proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares
of ASA Limited. (the “Company”), which the undersigned is entitled to vote at
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at the
offices of K&L Gates, LLP, 599 Lexington Avenue, 32nd
Floor, New York, NY 10022 on March 11, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and at
any adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy shall be voted
on the proposals described in the Proxy Statement and as specified on the
reverse side. Receipt of the Notice of the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders and the accompanying Proxy Statement.
|
|
IF
NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE AND THIS PROXY IS SIGNED AND RETURNED, THE PROXY
SHALL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL
Dated
______________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Signature(s)
(Title(s), if
applicable): (Sign
in the Box)
Note: Please
sign exactly as your name appears on this proxy card. When shares are held
by joint tenants, at least one holder should sign. When signing in a
fiduciary capacity, such as executor, administrator, trustee, attorney,
guardian, etc., please so indicate. Corporate and partnership proxies
should be signed by an authorized person indicating the person’s
title.
|
PLEASE
FOLD HERE AND RETURN THE ENTIRE BALLOT – DO NOT DETACH
YOUR VOTE
IS IMPORTANT, NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES YOU OWN. THE MATTERS WE ARE
SUBMITTING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS SIGNIFICANT TO THE COMPANY AND TO YOU AS A
COMPANY SHAREHOLDER. PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT
AND CAST YOUR VOTE USING ANY OF THE METHODS DESCRIBED BELOW.
Three
simple methods to vote your proxy:
1. INTERNET:
|
Log
on to www.proxyonline.com. Make sure to have this proxy card available
when you plan to vote your shares. You will need the control
number found in the box at the right at the time you execute your
vote.
|
|
Control Number:
|
2. TOUCHTONE PHONE:
|
Simply
dial toll-free 1-866-XXX-XXXX and follow the automated
instructions. Please have this proxy card available at the time
of the call.
|
|
[ ]
|
3. MAIL:
|
Simply
sign, date, and complete the reverse side of this proxy card and return it
in the postage paid envelope provided.
|
|
|
You can
find the proxy statement online at www.proxyonline.com. Please have
your Control number available at the time you plan to login.
TAG
ID: [ ] |
SCANNER
BAR |
CUSIP: [ ] |
ASA
LIMITED
WHEN THIS
PROXY IS PROPERLY EXECUTED, THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED AS
SPECIFIED. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR
THE PROPOSAL SET FORTH BELOW AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES WITH RESPECT
TO ALL OTHER MATTERS WHICH MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING AND ANY
ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF. THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE
ACCOMPANYING NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT.
PLEASE
MARK BOX IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS. Example: [ X ]
|
TO
VOTE ALL PROPOSALS IN THE SAME MANNER, SIMPLY CHECK ONE BOX TO THE
RIGHT.
|
FOR
ALL
|
AGAINST
ALL
|
ABSTAIN
ALL
|
|
|
|
TO
VOTE ON THE PROPOSALS INDIVIDUALLY, PLEASE MARK THE APPROPRIATE BOXES
BELOW, ONE BOX PER PROPOSAL:
|
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
FOLLOWING:
1
|
To
elect the Company’s Board of Directors:
|
FOR
|
AGAINST
|
ABSTAIN
|
a.
|
David
J. Christensen
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Phillip
Goldstein
|
|
|
|
c.
|
Andrew
Pegge
|
|
|
|
d.
|
Robert
A. Pilkington
|
|
|
|
e.
|
Julian
Reid
|
|
|
|
f.
|
Michael
L. Mead
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
AGAINST
|
ABSTAIN
|
2
|
To
ratify and approve the appointment of Ernst &Young LLP, an independent
registered accounting firm, as the Company’s independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending November 30, 2010, and to authorize the Audit and
Ethics Committee to set the independent auditors’
remuneration.
|
|
|
|
3
|
To
approve the proposal for the Company, either through a new wholly-owned
subsidiary, or directly, to provide investment advisory services to
others.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
To
amend the Company’s Memorandum of Association to permit the Company to
provide investment advisory services.
|
|
|
|
5
|
To
amend the Company’s fundamental investment policies to permit the Company
to acquire securities issued by an investment advisory
subsidiary.
|
|
|
|
6
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or
any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
|
|
|
PLEASE
SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE.
TAG
ID: [ ] |
SCANNER
BAR |
CUSIP: [ ] |