Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549  
_________________________
FORM 10-Q
_________________________
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________.
Commission File Number 001-35482
_________________________
ERICKSON INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  _________________________
Delaware
 
93-1307561
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5550 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, Oregon
 
97239
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(503) 505-5800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
 
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: N/A
(Title of each class) 
 _________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 
 
Large accelerated filer
 
¨
  
Accelerated filer
 
¨

 
Non-accelerated filer
 
ý  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
On August 10, 2016, 13,895,421 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, were outstanding.

1
Table of Contents

ERICKSON INCORPORATED
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


2
Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.    Financial Statements.

ERICKSON INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)


June 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
3,283

 
$
2,129

Restricted cash
222

 
373

Accounts receivable, net
41,861

 
40,520

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
6,204

 
5,233

Total current assets
51,570

 
48,255

Aircraft, net
144,989

 
155,917

Aircraft parts, net
173,655

 
169,824

Aircraft held for sale
6,200

 
12,348

Property, plant and equipment, net
23,590

 
25,553

Other assets
9,291

 
10,261

Other intangible assets, net
14,714

 
15,787

Goodwill, net
159,770

 
163,708

Total assets
$
583,779

 
$
601,653

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
28,225

 
$
13,660

Current portion of long-term debt
8,421

 
8,205

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
22,360

 
17,828

Total current liabilities
59,006

 
39,693

Credit facility
119,523

 
96,165

Long-term debt, less current portion
361,357

 
364,782

Other liabilities
17,949

 
11,720

Total liabilities
557,835

 
512,360

Equity:
 
 
 
Erickson Incorporated shareholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 110,000,000 shares authorized; 13,895,421 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
1

 
1

Additional paid-in capital
181,396

 
181,259

Accumulated deficit
(149,883
)
 
(84,901
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(6,543
)
 
(7,789
)
Total Erickson Incorporated shareholders’ equity
24,971

 
88,570

Noncontrolling interests’ equity
973

 
723

Total equity
25,944

 
89,293

Total liabilities and equity
$
583,779

 
$
601,653


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

3
Table of Contents

ERICKSON INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)(Unaudited) 
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,

2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues, net
$
50,838

 
$
67,019

 
$
95,667

 
$
130,981

Cost of revenues
52,168

 
59,101

 
101,071

 
122,076

Gross (loss) profit
(1,330
)
 
7,918

 
(5,404
)
 
8,905

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
6,161

 
5,847

 
12,653

 
12,398

Research and development
699

 
583

 
1,330

 
1,461

Selling and marketing
2,646

 
1,330

 
4,528

 
3,085

Loss on idle aircraft
7,815

 
—

 
7,815

 
—

Impairment of goodwill
4,523

 
—

 
4,523

 
49,823

Impairment of other assets
6,127

 
—

 
6,127

 
7,143

Total operating expenses
27,971

 
7,760

 
36,976

 
73,910

Operating (loss) income
(29,301
)
 
158

 
(42,380
)
 
(65,005
)
Interest expense, net
(9,475
)
 
(9,375
)
 
(18,722
)
 
(18,587
)
Other expense, net
(28
)
 
(331
)
 
(1,039
)
 
(1,656
)
Net loss before income tax (benefit) expense
(38,804
)
 
(9,548
)
 
(62,141
)
 
(85,248
)
Income tax (benefit) expense
(92
)
 
691

 
2,578

 
74

Net loss
(38,712
)
 
(10,239
)
 
(64,719
)
 
(85,322
)
Less: net (income) loss related to noncontrolling interests
(286
)
 
118

 
(263
)
 
231

Net loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(38,998
)
 
$
(10,121
)
 
$
(64,982
)
 
$
(85,091
)
Net loss per share attributable to Erickson Incorporated common shareholders—basic and diluted
$
(2.81
)
 
$
(0.73
)
 
$
(4.68
)
 
$
(6.15
)
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic and diluted
13,895,421

 
13,831,127

 
13,895,421

 
13,827,493


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

4
Table of Contents

ERICKSON INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Net loss
$
(38,712
)
 
$
(10,239
)
 
$
(64,719
)
 
$
(85,322
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)—Foreign currency translation adjustment
439

 
502

 
1,233

 
(2,089
)
Comprehensive loss
(38,273
)
 
(9,737
)
 
(63,486
)
 
(87,411
)
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(256
)
 
84

 
(250
)
 
320

Comprehensive loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(38,529
)
 
$
(9,653
)
 
$
(63,736
)
 
$
(87,091
)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

5
Table of Contents

ERICKSON INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,

2016
 
2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(64,719
)
 
$
(85,322
)
Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
19,088

 
18,716

Impairment of goodwill
4,523

 
49,823

Impairment of other assets
6,127

 
7,143

Deferred income taxes
1,797

 
(1,687
)
Amortization of debt issuance costs
1,238

 
1,254

Amortization of debt discount
277

 
406

Stock-based compensation
137

 
97

Loss (gain) on sale of aircraft and other property and equipment
1,155

 
(271
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(1,111
)
 
(4,472
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(1,103
)
 
210

Aircraft parts, net
(3,859
)
 
731

Aircraft held for sale
(3,683
)
 
—

Other assets
983

 
(1,615
)
Accounts payable
14,661

 
25

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
3,355

 
(266
)
Other liabilities
1,825

 
138

Net cash used in operating activities
(19,309
)
 
(15,090
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Purchases of aircraft and property, plant and equipment
(6,085
)
 
(11,839
)
Proceeds from sales of aircraft and other property and equipment
6,868

 
4,500

Restricted cash
155

 
124

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
938

 
(7,215
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Credit facility borrowings
79,891

 
97,553

Credit facility payments
(56,643
)
 
(73,182
)
Long-term debt principal payments, including capital lease payments
(4,337
)
 
(3,340
)
Other long-term borrowings
—

 
(84
)
Debt issuance costs
(276
)
 
(137
)
Shares withheld for payment of taxes
—

 
(32
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
18,635

 
20,778

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
890

 
(1,804
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
1,154

 
(3,331
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
2,129

 
5,097

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
3,283

 
$
1,766

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
$
16,695

 
$
18,097

Cash paid for income taxes, net
511

 
1,267

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
 
 
 
Note payable incurred for the purchase of aircraft parts
—

 
9,356


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

6
Table of Contents

ERICKSON INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Business

Erickson Incorporated (“EI”) and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies (collectively referred to as “Erickson” or “the Company”) is a global provider of aviation services. We operate, maintain and manufacture utility aircraft to transport and place people and cargo around the world for commercial and governmental entities, with three distinct reportable segments consisting of Commercial Aviation Services, Global Defense and Security, and Manufacturing and Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (“MRO”). Through our Commercial Aviation Services and Global Defense and Security segments, we provide aerial services that include critical supply and logistics for firefighting, timber harvesting, infrastructure construction, deployed military forces, humanitarian relief, and crewing. Through our Manufacturing and MRO segment, we provide manufacturing and maintenance, repair and overhaul services for our own fleet and third parties.

The Company’s fleet consisted of the following as of June 30, 2016:

Type:
 
Heavy lift helicopters, known as ‘Aircranes’
20

Rotor-wing aircraft:

Light lift helicopters
9

Medium lift helicopters
33

Fixed-wing aircraft
7

 
69


As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s aircraft fleet includes 4 idle aircraft and 11 aircraft that are held for sale.

The Company’s operations span the globe with a presence on six continents and 26 aircraft deployed outside of North America as of June 30, 2016. As a global provider of aviation services, a significant portion of its revenues are generated outside of North America and represented 61% and 63% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such regulations, although Erickson believes that the disclosures provided are adequate to make the interim information presented not misleading.

To conform with 2016 presentation, the Company made the following reclassifications to the 2015 condensed consolidated financial statements:

•
Reclassified deferred overhauls not installed on an aircraft in the amount of $30.2 million from aircraft, net to aircraft parts, net as of December 31, 2015;
•
Reclassified aircraft sales of $2.3 million from revenues, with cost of revenues of $2.5 million, to a loss on sale of aircraft of $0.2 million, which is included in general and administrative expense on the statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2015;
•
Reclassified aircraft sales of $4.5 million from revenues, with costs of revenues of $4.3 million, to a gain on sale of aircraft of $0.2 million, which is included in general and administrative expense on the statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

In addition, the Company presented the note payable incurred during the first quarter of 2015 for the purchase of aircraft parts in the supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities section of the statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Such presentation is to conform with the classification of the note payable as long-term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

7
Table of Contents


The financial information included herein for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial position, condensed consolidated results of operations, and condensed consolidated cash flows of the Company for these interim periods. Certain costs are estimated for the full year and allocated to interim periods based on estimates of operating time expired, benefit received, or activity associated with the interim period; accordingly, such costs may not be reflective of amounts to be recognized for a full year. Due to seasonal fluctuations in revenues, interim financial results do not necessarily represent those to be expected for the year. The financial information as of December 31, 2015 is derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015, included in Item 8 of Erickson’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016, which should be read in conjunction with such condensed consolidated financial statements.

Liquidity Matters

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As a result of recurring losses, negative cash flow from operations and limited borrowing capacity under our existing revolving credit facility, we are experiencing constraints on our liquidity and, as of June 30, 2016, have negative working capital. The Company has retained an investment bank and a legal firm both of whom specialize in restructuring, and are evaluating various options with regard to its capital structure and other strategic alternatives. While management expects to successfully address the Company’s cost and liquidity challenges, there is risk that such efforts may not yield desired outcomes, which could have a significant adverse effect on its operations. As of June 30, 2016, the Company has $3.3 million of available liquidity. Absent a refinancing of the revolver and any other successful liquidity initiatives, there is a high probability that the company will not be able to fund the $14.6 million interest payment on the senior notes, due November 1, 2016. For additional information concerning liquidity matters, see Credit Facility and Long-term Debt sections in Note 2.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of gain or loss contingencies, as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results experienced by the Company could differ materially from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which creates a new Topic 606 and supersedes the revenue requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. ASU 2014-09 provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized that consists of: i) identifying the contract with the customer; ii) identifying the performance obligations in the contract; iii) determining the transaction price; iv) allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations, and v) recognizing revenue when or as each performance obligation is satisfied. Companies can transition to the requirements of this ASU either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption, which was originally January 1, 2017 for the Company. Early adoption is not permitted. In August 2015, ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) was issued which defers by one year the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The effective date for the Company is January 1, 2018 for the adoption of the requirements of ASU 2014-09. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated statement of cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which will require organizations that lease assets, lessees, to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. A lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, or January 1, 2019 for the Company. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined the effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated statement of cash flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) (“ASU 2016-09”), which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public entities, the provisions of ASU 2016-09 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim

8
Table of Contents

periods within those annual periods, or January 1, 2017 for the Company. Early adoption is permitted. The transition to the requirements of this ASU will be either i) modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is adopted, ii) retrospective application or iii) prospective application depending on the nature of amendment. The Company has not yet determined the effect of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated statement of cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (“ASU 2014-15”), a new standard that requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide disclosures when certain criteria are met. The provisions of ASU 2014-15 are effective for public entities for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2016, or January 1, 2017 for the Company, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or consolidated statement of cash flows, although there may be additional disclosures made pursuant to the requirements of this ASU.

NOTE 2—BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Trade accounts receivable
$
39,603

 
$
35,039

Other receivables
3,612

 
4,244

Costs in excess of billings
—

 
1,704

 
43,215

 
40,987

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
(1,354
)
 
(467
)

$
41,861

 
$
40,520


Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Balance as of beginning of period
$
467

 
$
739

Provisions
1,022

 
—

Amounts written-off, net of recoveries
(135
)
 
(548
)
Balance as of end of period
$
1,354

 
$
191


The Company had bad debt expense of $0.8 million and $1.0 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, with zero for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

The following is a summary of customers that accounted for at least 10% of trade account receivable balance as of June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015:
 
Segment
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Customer A
Global Defense and Security
 
16.8
%
 
11.9
%
Customer B
Global Defense and Security
 
10.1

 
14.0

Customer C
Manufacturing and MRO
 
2.3

 
11.2

 
 
 
29.2
%
 
37.1
%


9
Table of Contents

Aircraft, Net and Property, Plant and Equipment, Net consist of the following (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Aircraft:
 
 
 
Aircraft
$
129,381

 
$
132,530

Aircraft under capital lease
3,866

 
3,866

Construction-in-progress
10,711

 
10,056

 
143,958

 
146,452

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
(45,486
)
 
(41,401
)
Add: deferred overhauls, net
46,517

 
50,866

Aircraft, net
$
144,989

 
$
155,917

Property, plant and equipment:
 
 
 
Land and land improvements
$
192

 
$
308

Buildings
5,725

 
5,219

Vehicles and equipment
35,461

 
34,115

Assets under capital lease—hangar and vehicles
5,440

 
5,440

Construction-in-progress
3,376

 
4,323

 
50,194

 
49,405

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
(26,604
)
 
(23,852
)
Property, plant and equipment, net
$
23,590

 
$
25,553


We have aircraft under operating lease arrangements. The Company has continued efforts to rationalize its aircraft fleet, and has identified four aircraft that the Company has ceased to use in operations, known as ‘idle aircraft.’ As of June 30, 2016, the Company has recorded the remaining lease liability related to these leased idle aircraft, which is classified as a loss on idle aircraft in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016.

Depreciation and amortization expense consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Depreciation expense
$
4,280

 
$
4,427

 
$
8,532

 
$
9,160

Amortization expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred overhauls
4,586

 
4,807

 
9,282

 
8,252

Assets under capital lease
100

 
1

 
200

 
1

Total amortization expense
4,686

 
4,808

 
9,482

 
8,253

Total depreciation and amortization expense
$
8,966

 
$
9,235

 
$
18,014

 
$
17,413


Aircraft Parts, Net consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Finished parts
$
133,394

 
$
134,410

Deferred overhauls
35,707

 
30,215

Work-in-process
11,576

 
10,405

Less: excess and obsolete reserve
(7,022
)
 
(5,206
)

$
173,655

 
$
169,824



10
Table of Contents

Activity for the excess and obsolete reserve was as follows (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Balance as of beginning of period
$
5,206

 
$
5,640

Provision for excess and obsolete aircraft parts
3,249

 
164

Write-off of excess and obsolete aircraft parts
(1,433
)
 
(204
)
Balance as of end of period
$
7,022

 
$
5,600


For 2016, the provision for excess and obsolete aircraft parts includes $1.4 million for aircraft parts related to aircraft that have been classified as held for sale, which is included in the impairment of other assets on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016.

Aircraft Held for Sale activity was as follows (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended June 30,

2016
 
2015
Balance as of beginning of period
$
12,348

 
$
—

Aircraft classified as held for sale
3,832

 
15,514

Aircraft reclassified from held for sale
(2,653
)
 
—

Impairment charge on aircraft held for sale
(3,381
)
 
(7,143
)
Book value of aircraft sold
(4,179
)
 
—

Fluctuations due to foreign currency translation adjustments
233

 
65

Balance as of end of period
$
6,200

 
$
8,436


During the second quarter of 2016, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $3.4 million related to the write down of the carrying amount of certain aircraft held for sale to their estimated fair value less the costs to sell. These charges are included in impairment of other assets in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016. Of the 17 aircraft in held for sale at the end of 2015, 11 of those aircraft were still held for sale at the end of the second quarter, and were further impaired due to ongoing declines in market values. One of our major competitors filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in the second quarter, which was a contributing factor to the decline in market values in our industry. The fair value of aircraft held for sale is considered a level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy as the measurement is based on the recent sales and listed prices in the active markets for similar aircraft.

Other Intangible Assets, Net consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
Reportable Segment
 
Useful Life
(in years)
 
June 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
Customer Relationships
Global Defense and Security
 
9
 
$
19,300

 
$
19,300

Customer Relationships
Commercial Aviation Services
 
2
 
2,500

 
2,500

Type Certificate for Aircrane engines
Manufacturing and MRO
 
Indefinite
 
2,205

 
2,205

 
 
 
 
 
24,005

 
24,005

Less: accumulated amortization
 
 
 
 
(9,291
)
 
(8,218
)

 
 
 
 
$
14,714

 
$
15,787



11
Table of Contents

Amortization expense for intangible assets is recorded in cost of revenues and was $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the second quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $1.1 million and $1.3 million for the first half of 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, future estimated amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
Six months ending December 31:
 
2016
$
1,071

Year ending December 31:
 
2017
2,144

2018
2,144

2019
2,144

2020
2,144

Thereafter
2,862

 
$
12,509


Goodwill, Net

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

Global Defense and Security
 
Commercial Aviation Services
 
Manufacturing and MRO
 
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill, gross
$
207,128

 
$
22,133

 
$
5,542

 
$
234,803

Accumulated impairment losses
(71,095
)
 
—

 
—

 
(71,095
)
Goodwill, net
136,033

 
22,133

 
5,542

 
163,708

Activity during 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment losses
—

 
(4,523
)
 
—

 
(4,523
)
Fluctuations due to foreign currency translation adjustments
—

 
585

 
—

 
585

Balance as of June 30, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill, gross
207,128

 
22,718

 
5,542

 
235,388

Accumulated impairment losses
(71,095
)
 
(4,523
)
 
—

 
(75,618
)
Goodwill, net
$
136,033

 
$
18,195

 
$
5,542

 
$
159,770


During the second quarter of 2016, the Company performed the annual goodwill impairment test for the Global Defense and Security, Commercial Aviation Services, and Manufacturing and MRO reporting units. The Company assessed qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units are less than their respective carrying amounts. In the second quarter of 2016, several triggering events prompted the Company to perform step one of the goodwill impairment test for the Global Defense and Security reporting unit. The triggering events included declines in industry and market conditions, a sustained decrease in the Company’s share price, a decline in the Company’s overall financial performance, and a change in a senior management position. The Company’s last Step 1 analysis was performed as of the fourth quarter of 2015 for all three reporting units. The step one analysis for the Commercial Aviation Services and Manufacturing and MRO reporting units was not re-performed in the second quarter of 2016 given that no significant events or changes in internal forecasts have occurred that would result in a significantly different result. Only the Global Defense and Security reporting unit Step 1 analysis was performed, in light of the majority of the Company’s goodwill being associated with this reporting unit, and the asset impairments recorded in the second quarter of 2016. The outcome of the analysis revealed that the fair value of the Global Defense and Security reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount, and as a result, no goodwill impairment charge was recorded for that reporting unit in the second quarter of 2016.

During June 2016, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its wholly-owned Brazilian subsidiary. The subsidiary was originally purchased in September 2013, and while various integration efforts were attempted, the benefits of the acquired goodwill were never realized by the Commercial Aviation Services reporting unit. As a result, the carrying amount of the acquired goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the business to be disposed of, and reduces the amount of goodwill reported for the Commercial Aviation Services reporting unit. Accordingly, a goodwill impairment charge was recorded during the second quarter of 2016.


12
Table of Contents

Credit Facility
 
The Company has a $140.0 million revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”), which consisted of the following (in thousands):


June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Borrowings outstanding under Credit Facility
$
121,330

 
$
97,997

Less: deferred debt issuance costs
(1,807
)
 
(1,832
)
 
$
119,523

 
$
96,165


The Credit Facility is primarily used for general corporate purposes and matures May 2, 2018. EI and each of the Company’s current and future, direct and indirect, material subsidiaries guarantee the indebtedness under the Credit Facility on a senior-secured first-lien basis. The Credit Facility includes mandatory prepayment requirements for certain types of transactions, including, but not limited to, requiring prepayment from proceeds that the Company receives as a result of certain asset sales, subject to re-investment provisions on terms to be determined, and proceeds from extraordinary receipts.

During 2016, the Company entered into numerous amendments to the Credit Facility. As a result, the terms of the Credit Facility contain, among other things, a requirement that a certain level of borrowing capacity be maintained, known as “Excess Availability,” which is as follows:

•
$10.0 million for the period from July 25, 2016 through August 15, 2016;
•
$12.0 million for the period from August 16, 2016 through August 22, 2016;
•
$13.5 million for the period from August 23, 2016 through August 29, 2016;
•
$17.5 million for the period from August 30, 2016 through October 2, 2016; and
•
$20.0 million for the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

In addition, the fixed charge financial covenant period commencement date was delayed to any period on or after January 1, 2017 on which Excess Availability is less than $20 million as of such date and the interest rate was set at 550 basis points, or 5.5%, over the prime base rate or 650 basis points, or 6.5% over the London Interbank Offered Rate, as applicable, resulting in an increase of 200 basis points, or 2%, over the highest chargeable rates prior to any amendments entered into during 2016.

The Company entered into an amendment fee letter with the lenders under the Credit Facility in July 2016, which formalizes a requirement that the Company agrees to seek a refinancing of its Credit Facility in its entirety (the “Refinancing”) and requires the Company to meet short term progress milestones related to the Refinancing. In the event the Company is unable to refinance the Credit Facility in its entirety, and otherwise satisfy in full in cash all outstanding amounts and other obligations under the Credit Facility, the Company will be responsible to pay the following incentive fees:

•
$3.5 million if the Refinancing has not occurred on or before August 29, 2016;
•
An additional $1.5 million if the Refinancing has not occurred on or before September 12, 2016; and
•
An additional $500,000 each two weeks thereafter if the Refinancing has not occurred on or before September 26, 2016 and each second Monday thereafter, as applicable.

The interest rate under the Credit Facility was a weighted average of 5.3% as of June 30, 2016 and 5.2% as of December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $2.4 million of outstanding standby letters of credit under the Credit Facility, with a maximum borrowing availability of $6.2 million.


13
Table of Contents

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Senior notes payable
$
355,000

 
$
355,000

Subordinated notes payable
9,778

 
11,478

Capital lease obligations
7,853

 
8,417

Other notes payable
4,179

 
6,254

Total long-term debt before unamortized debt discounts and deferred debt issuance costs
376,810

 
381,149

Unamortized debt discounts
(493
)
 
(770
)
Deferred debt issuance costs
(6,539
)
 
(7,392
)
Total long-term debt
369,778

 
372,987

Less: current portion of long-term debt
(8,421
)
 
(8,205
)
Long-term debt, less current portion
$
361,357

 
$
364,782


ZM EAC LLC beneficially owns approximately 33.6% of the Company’s outstanding capital stock. Q&U Investments LLC is the managing member of entities that beneficially own approximately 20.9% of the Company’s outstanding capital stock. Quinn Morgan, the managing member of ZM EAC and Q&U Investments, is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. During May 2016, entities affiliated with ZM EAC and Q&U Investments acquired $1.2 million of the subordinated notes payable from third parties.

The senior notes payable have semi-annual interest payments due May 1 and November 1, with the next interest payment of $14.6 million due November 1, 2016.

NOTE 3—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities. The carrying value of borrowings under the Credit Facility approximate fair value due to the variable rate nature of the indebtedness.

Long-term debt is recorded at amortized cost in EI’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the Company’s senior notes is classified as a Level 1 fair value measurement and is estimated based on the quoted market prices for such instruments. The fair value of all other long-term notes is classified as Level 3 fair value measurement and is estimated based on the terms of the individual loans and the Company’s creditworthiness. These significant unobservable inputs to the Level 3 fair value measurement include the interest rate and the term of the loan. The estimated fair value of the Company’s other long-term notes, excluding the senior notes, approximates their carrying value.

As of June 30, 2016, the carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt was $369.8 million and its estimated aggregate fair value was $240.9 million, consisting of $219.6 million and $21.3 million classified as Level 1 and Level 3, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2015, the carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt was $373.0 million and its estimated aggregate fair value was $256.9 million, consisting of $231.5 million and $25.4 million classified as Level 1 and Level 3, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy.

As of June 30, 2016, Erickson was a party to thirteen foreign currency forward contracts which will settle at various dates through December 2016, and had six foreign currency forward contracts as of December 31, 2015. The fair value of foreign currency contracts is considered a level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy as the measurement is based on observable rates or measurements to determine fair value and include rates, spreads, amounts and value dates for such contracts. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of such foreign currency forward contracts was $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which is included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis consisted of goodwill.


14
Table of Contents

NOTE 4—EQUITY

The activity in equity during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
 
Noncontrolling Interests

Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2015
13,895,421

 
$
1

 
$
181,259

 
$
(84,901
)
 
$
(7,789
)
 
 
$
723

Stock-based compensation
—

 
—

 
137

 
—

 
—

 
 
—

Net loss
—

 
—

 
—

 
(64,982
)
 
—

 
 
263

Other comprehensive income(loss)—Foreign currency translation adjustment
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,246

 
 
(13
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
13,895,421

 
$
1

 
$
181,396

 
$
(149,883
)
 
$
(6,543
)
 
 
$
973

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2014
13,823,818

 
$
1

 
$
181,018

 
$
1,812

 
$
(2,544
)
 
 
$
726

Issuance of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units
16,213

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
 
—

Stock-based compensation
—

 
—

 
97

 
—

 
—

 
 
—

Shares withheld for payment of taxes
(6,857
)
 
—

 
(32
)
 
—

 
—

 
 
—

Net loss
—

 
—

 
—

 
(85,091
)
 
—

 
 
(231
)
Other comprehensive loss—Foreign currency translation adjustment
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(2,000
)
 
 
(89
)
Balance at June 30, 2015
13,833,174

 
$
1

 
$
181,083

 
$
(83,279
)
 
$
(4,544
)
 
 
$
406


NOTE 5—REPORTABLE SEGMENTS

The Company reports segment information based on the “management” approach. The management approach designates the internal reporting used by management for making decisions and assessing performance as the source of the Company’s reportable segments. The Company’s operations by its three reportable segments are as follows:

Commercial Aviation Services segment revenues are derived from firefighting, timber harvesting, infrastructure construction, oil and gas services, and other commercial services.

Global Defense and Security segment revenues are derived primarily from contracts with the United States Department of Defense, international governments, and other government organizations, and third parties that contract with such governmental agencies and organizations, who use the Company’s services for defense and security, and transportation and other government-related activities.

Manufacturing and MRO segment revenues are derived from manufacturing and maintenance, repair, and overhaul services for certain aircraft, as well as aircraft sales.

Information about the Company’s revenues and gross profit by its three reportable segments, as well as a reconciliation of the Company’s reportable segment gross profit to operating loss, is as follows (in thousands):

15
Table of Contents

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues, net:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Aviation Services
$
20,991

 
$
34,319

 
$
40,937

 
$
60,572

Global Defense and Security
21,371

 
28,391

 
40,440

 
61,266

Manufacturing and MRO
8,476

 
4,309

 
14,290

 
9,143

Total net revenues
$
50,838

 
$
67,019

 
$
95,667

 
$
130,981

Gross (loss) profit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Aviation Services
$
(5,447
)
 
$
3,686

 
(9,805
)
 
(1,001
)
Global Defense and Security
751

 
2,117

 
(208
)
 
6,479

Manufacturing and MRO
3,366

 
2,115

 
4,609

 
3,427

Total gross (loss) profit
(1,330
)
 
7,918

 
(5,404
)
 
8,905

Less: operating expenses
27,971

 
7,760

 
36,976

 
73,910

Operating (loss) income
$
(29,301
)
 
$
158

 
$
(42,380
)
 
$
(65,005
)

Customers that accounted for at least 10% of the Company’s net revenues were as follows:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Segment
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Customer B
Global Defense and Security
 
22.1
%
 
15.4
%
 
22.3
%
 
21.3
%
Customer A
Global Defense and Security
 
16.6

 
9.0

 
16.2

 
10.5

 
 
 
38.7
%
 
24.4
%
 
38.5
%
 
31.8
%

Revenues, net by geographic area were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,

2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues, net:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
North America
$
19,917

 
$
24,898

 
$
32,661

 
$
39,555

Middle East
11,213

 
16,568

 
21,375

 
33,125

Africa
8,416

 
6,979

 
15,459

 
13,772

Europe
4,606

 
3,051

 
6,017

 
3,904

South America
3,188

 
10,066

 
7,023

 
21,103

Asia
3,464

 
5,379

 
5,816

 
10,994

Australia
34

 
78

 
7,316

 
8,528

 
$
50,838

 
$
67,019

 
$
95,667

 
$
130,981


For each operating segment, revenues are attributed to geographic area based on the country where the services were performed; for the Manufacturing and MRO reportable segment, revenues are attributed to geographic area based on the country in which the customer is located.

Assets by reportable segment was as follows (in thousands):

June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Assets:
 
 
 
Global Defense and Security
$
169,483

 
$
173,882

Commercial Aviation Services
41,191

 
41,857

Manufacturing and MRO
19,378

 
25,623

Corporate(1)
5,292

 
3,917

Aircraft held for sale
6,200

 
12,348

Fixed Assets(2)
342,235

 
344,026

 
$
583,779

 
$
601,653


16
Table of Contents


(1)
Comprised primarily of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and deferred tax assets.
(2)
Comprised of the aircraft fleet and fleet support assets including: aircraft, net; aircraft parts, net; and property, plant, and equipment, net, which are primarily used to support the aircraft fleet, with minimal amounts allocated to the corporate function.

NOTE 6—LOSS PER SHARE

Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of stock-based awards such as stock options.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the net loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated common shareholders is the same for both basic and diluted loss per share computations. Due to the Company’s net loss position, shares of 313,500 were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per common share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 as their effect would have been anti-dilutive, with 20,500 excluded for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015.

NOTE 7—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is subject to ongoing litigation and claims as part of its normal business operations and makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company recognizes expenses for legal costs in connection with defending a loss contingency as those costs are incurred.

Arizona Environmental Matter

In August 2012, Erickson Helicopters, Inc. (formerly “Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.” and Erickson’s wholly-owned subsidiary, ‘‘EHI’’) received a request for information from the State of Arizona and has been served various petitions regarding the Broadway-Pantano Site in Tucson, Arizona, which is comprised of two landfills at which the State of Arizona has been conducting soil and groundwater investigations and cleanups related to site contamination. According to these documents, the State has identified approximately 101 parties that are potentially responsible for the contamination. It is possible that the State or other liable parties may assert that EHI is liable for the alleged contamination at the site. At this time, the Company is not able to determine the likelihood of any outcome in this matter, nor is it able to estimate the amount or range of loss or the impact on its financial condition in the event of an unfavorable outcome.

World Fuel Claim

In December 2013, World Fuel, a former fuel supplier of Evergreen International Aviation (‘‘EIA’’) and Evergreen Airlines (‘‘EA’’), filed suit in the Circuit Court of Yamhill County, Oregon (“Circuit Court”) against EIA, EA and other named parties claiming approximately $9 million of accounts payable, not including claimed accrued interest, due and owing to World Fuel for fuel purchases made by EIA and EA. EHI was a named party in the lawsuit since it was alleged that EHI signed a joint and several guaranty of payment in favor of World Fuel in 2012. In April 2014, the Company filed an answer, which included certain counterclaims against World Fuel and certain cross claims against Mr. Delford Smith. In January 2016, the Company agreed to accept an Offer of Judgment from the Estate of Mr. Delford Smith in connection with the Estate’s admission to certain factual issues in the lawsuit. In March 2016, World Fuel initiated the process to dismiss the suit filed in the Circuit Court in order to re-file the suit in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. At this time, the Company is not able to determine the likelihood of any outcome in this matter, nor is it able to estimate the amount or range of loss or the impact on its financial condition in the event of an unfavorable outcome.

Stockholder Action

In August 2013, a stockholder class and derivative action was filed in the Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware against the Company, members of our board of directors, EAC Acquisition Corp., and entities associated with ZM Equity Partners, LLC and certain of their affiliates. The plaintiff asserted claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment in connection with the acquisition of Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. and requested an award of unspecified monetary damages, disgorgement and restitution, certain other equitable relief, and an award of plaintiff’s costs and disbursements, including legal fees. In June 2016, the parties entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release (the “Stipulation”). The Stipulation was entered into for the sole purpose of resolving contested claims and disputes, as well as

17
Table of Contents

avoiding the costs, risk and uncertainties inherent in litigation. The Stipulation does not contain any finding of fault or admission of wrongdoing or liability on the part of the Company or any of the individual defendants in the litigation.

The terms of the Stipulation (a) include the creation of a settlement fund in the amount of $18.5 million, a portion of which will be distributed to plaintiff’s counsel for attorneys’ fees and expenses, with 80% of the remaining funds to be distributed to the Class Members pursuant to the Plan of Allocation and 20% of the remaining funds to be distributed to the Company, and (b) require the Company to amend certain provisions of its Certificate of Incorporation with respect to certain change or control and related party transactions. In addition, under the terms of the Stipulation, the plaintiff and each stockholder of the Company shall be deemed to have released the defendants from any and all claims, including unknown claims, relating to the matters asserted or that could have been asserted in the litigation.

The portion of the settlement fund to be paid by the Company is expected to be covered by the Company’s existing directors and officers insurance policy and therefore, the Company does not expect any material impact on the Company’s financial condition. The Stipulation is subject to and conditioned upon final approval by the Court, after public notice of the proposed settlement.

NOTE 8—VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of two variable interest entities (“VIEs”), EuAC and Costa Do Sol Taxi Aero Corporation (“Costa Do Sol”). An entity is generally considered a VIE that is subject to consolidation if the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; or as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any one of the following characteristics: (a) the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; (b) the obligation to absorb expected losses of the entity; or (c) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity.

•
EuAC. This entity is 49% owned by EI; 49% owned by Grupo Inaer (“Inaer”); and 2% owned by Fiduciaria Centro Nord (“FCN”). EI provided FCN with the financial means to purchase and transfer the shares of EuAC, in exchange for the patrimonial and administrative rights derived from the shares. These rights include the right to decide whether and how to vote in shareholders’ meetings and the right to decide whether, when and to whom the shares should be transferred and endorsed.

•
Costa Do Sol. Air Amazonia, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, entered into a purchase agreement in 2014 to acquire 100% of the preferred non-voting stock and 20% of the common voting stock of Costa Do Sol and an employee of Air Amazonia, a Brazilian national, entered into a purchase agreement at the same time to acquire 80% of the common voting stock of Costa Do Sol. In connection with the purchase agreements, the selling shareholders of Costa Do Sol executed a power-of-attorney authorizing Air Amazonia to transact business on behalf of Costa, at which time, Air Amazonia began to manage the operations of Costa Do Sol. Although the purchase transaction is pending approval by the National Civil Aviation Agency of Brazil, Air Amazonia has the authority to operate and transact business on behalf of Cost Do Sol through the power-of-attorney.

Determining whether EI is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is complex, subjective and requires the use of judgments and assumptions. Significant judgments and assumptions made by the Company in determining that it is the primary beneficiary of EuAC and Costa Do Sol include the following: i) the Company has the experience to own and operate aviation services-type entities and has the ability to make decisions and has control over the VIEs’ most significant activities, ii) the Company bears the exposure to the expected losses of the VIE if they occur; and iii) the Company has the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. As such, as of June 30, 2016, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet includes EuAC and Costa Do Sol assets of $0.9 million and liabilities of $1.0 million, and EuAC and Costa Do Sol assets of $3.1 million and liabilities of $1.3 million as of December 31, 2015.

NOTE 9—CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have guaranteed its obligations under the $355.0 million outstanding principal amount of 8.25% notes due 2020 (the “2020 Senior Notes”). In lieu of providing separate audited financial statements for each guarantor subsidiary, the Company has included the following condensed consolidating financial information in accordance with Rule 3-10 of SEC Regulation S-X for:
 
•
Erickson Incorporated (the ‘‘Parent Company’’), the issuer of the guaranteed obligations;


18
Table of Contents

•
Subsidiaries of EI that guarantee the Company’s obligations under the 2020 Senior Notes, referred to as “Guarantor Subsidiaries;”

•
Non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis;

•
Consolidating entries and eliminations representing adjustments to (a) eliminate intercompany transactions between or among the Parent Company, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries, (b) eliminate the investments in the Company’s subsidiaries, and (c) record consolidating entries; and

•
Erickson Incorporated and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Each guarantor subsidiary was 100% owned by the Parent Company as of the date of each condensed consolidating balance sheet presented. The 2020 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several liability basis by each guarantor subsidiary. Each entity in the consolidating financial information follows the same accounting policies as described in the consolidated financial statements, except for the use by the Parent Company and guarantor subsidiaries of the equity method of accounting to reflect ownership interests in subsidiaries which are eliminated upon consolidation. Changes in intercompany receivables and payables related to operations, such as intercompany sales or service charges, are included in cash flows from operating activities. All amounts presented are in thousands.


19
Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet 
 June 30, 2016

Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
797

 
$
102

 
$
2,384

 
$
—

 
$
3,283

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
222

 
—

 
222

Accounts receivable, net
17,680

 
14,354

 
9,789

 
38

 
41,861

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
4,615

 
837

 
752

 
—

 
6,204

Total current assets
23,092

 
15,293

 
13,147

 
38

 
51,570

Aircraft, net
105,503

 
38,598

 
888

 
—

 
144,989

Aircraft parts, net
126,616

 
46,897

 
187

 
(45
)
 
173,655

Aircraft held for sale
1,500

 
4,700

 
—

 
—

 
6,200

Property, plant and equipment, net
18,709

 
4,326

 
555

 
—

 
23,590

Other assets
311,813

 
7,329

 
619

 
(310,470
)
 
9,291

Other intangible assets, net
2,205

 
12,509

 
—

 
—

 
14,714

Goodwill, net
—

 
160,532

 
—

 
(762
)
 
159,770

Total assets
$
589,438

 
$
290,184

 
$
15,396

 
$
(311,239
)
 
$
583,779

Liabilities and equity (deficit)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
12,413

 
$
13,983

 
$
1,829

 
$
—

 
$
28,225

Current portion of long-term debt
7,451

 
970

 
—

 
—

 
8,421

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
16,473

 
3,872

 
2,015

 
—

 
22,360

Total current liabilities
36,337

 
18,825

 
3,844

 
—

 
59,006

Credit facility
119,523

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
119,523

Long-term debt, less current portion
359,660

 
1,697

 
—

 
—

 
361,357

Other liabilities
(8,811
)
 
10,070

 
16,690

 
—

 
17,949

Total liabilities
506,709

 
30,592

 
20,534

 
—

 
557,835

Equity (deficit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Erickson Incorporated shareholders’ equity (deficit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock
1

 
—

 
7,053

 
(7,053
)
 
1

Additional paid-in capital
181,396

 
297,994

 
5,785

 
(303,779
)
 
181,396

Accumulated deficit
(94,453
)
 
(38,402
)
 
(17,028
)
 
—

 
(149,883
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(4,215
)
 
—

 
(1,581
)
 
(747
)
 
(6,543
)
Total Erickson Incorporated shareholders’ equity (deficit)
82,729

 
259,592

 
(5,771
)
 
(311,579
)
 
24,971

Noncontrolling interests
—

 
—

 
633

 
340

 
973

Total equity (deficit)
82,729

 
259,592

 
(5,138
)
 
(311,239
)
 
25,944

Total liabilities and equity (deficit)
$
589,438

 
$
290,184

 
$
15,396

 
$
(311,239
)
 
$
583,779


20
Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet 
 December 31, 2015

Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
13

 
$
71

 
$
2,045

 
$
—

 
$
2,129

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
373

 
—

 
373

Accounts receivable, net
18,053

 
15,887

 
6,542

 
38

 
40,520

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
3,637

 
1,028

 
568

 
—

 
5,233

Total current assets
21,703

 
16,986

 
9,528

 
38

 
48,255

Aircraft, net
108,792

 
46,589

 
536

 
—

 
155,917

Aircraft parts, net
128,038

 
41,543

 
288

 
(45
)
 
169,824

Aircraft held for sale
5,880

 
5,316

 
1,152

 
—

 
12,348

Property, plant and equipment, net
20,367

 
4,606

 
580

 
—

 
25,553

Other assets
311,798

 
8,309

 
624

 
(310,470
)
 
10,261

Other intangible assets, net
2,205

 
13,582

 
—

 
—

 
15,787

Goodwill, net
—

 
160,533

 
3,937

 
(762
)
 
163,708

Total assets
$
598,783

 
$
297,464

 
$
16,645

 
$
(311,239
)
 
$
601,653

Liabilities and equity (deficit)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
6,165

 
$
6,270

 
$
1,225

 
$
—

 
$
13,660

Current portion of long-term debt
7,292

 
913

 
—

 
—

 
8,205

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
15,524

 
1,588

 
716

 
—

 
17,828

Total current liabilities
28,981

 
8,771

 
1,941

 
—

 
39,693

Credit facility
96,165

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
96,165

Long-term debt, less current portion
362,585

 
2,197

 
—

 
—

 
364,782

Other long-term liabilities
(30,830
)
 
26,046

 
16,504

 
—

 
11,720

Total liabilities
456,901

 
37,014

 
18,445

 
—

 
512,360

Equity (deficit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Erickson Incorporated shareholders’ equity (deficit):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock
1

 
—

 
7,052

 
(7,052
)
 
1

Additional paid-in capital
181,259

 
297,994

 
33

 
(298,027
)
 
181,259

Accumulated deficit
(34,322
)
 
(37,544
)
 
(7,545
)
 
(5,490
)
 
(84,901
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(5,056
)
 
—

 
(1,974
)
 
(759
)
 
(7,789
)
Total Erickson Incorporated shareholders’ equity (deficit)
141,882

 
260,450

 
(2,434
)
 
(311,328
)
 
88,570

Noncontrolling interests
—

 
—

 
634

 
89

 
723

Total equity (deficit)
141,882

 
260,450

 
(1,800
)
 
(311,239
)
 
89,293

Total liabilities and equity (deficit)
$
598,783

 
$
297,464

 
$
16,645

 
$
(311,239
)
 
$
601,653


21
Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations 
 Three Months June 30, 2016

Parent 
Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenues, net
$
23,847

 
$
23,634

 
$
11,838

 
$
(8,481
)
 
$
50,838

Cost of revenues
31,549

 
17,261

 
11,669

 
(8,311
)
 
52,168

Gross (loss) profit
(7,702
)
 
6,373

 
169

 
(170
)
 
(1,330
)
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
6,257

 
(192
)
 
96

 
—

 
6,161

Research and development
699

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
699

Selling and marketing
2,606

 
176

 
34

 
(170
)
 
2,646

Loss on idle aircraft
—

 
7,815

 
—

 
—

 
7,815

Impairment of goodwill
—

 
—

 
4,523

 
—

 
4,523

Impairment of other assets
1,480

 
4,647

 
—

 
—

 
6,127

Total operating expenses
11,042

 
12,446

 
4,653

 
(170
)
 
27,971

Operating loss
(18,744
)
 
(6,073
)
 
(4,484
)
 
—

 
(29,301
)
Interest expense, net
(9,302
)
 
(84
)
 
(89
)
 
—

 
(9,475
)
Other (expense) income, net
(717
)
 
7

 
682

 
—

 
(28
)
Net loss before income taxes
(28,763
)
 
(6,150
)
 
(3,891
)
 
—

 
(38,804
)
Income tax (benefit) expense
(320
)
 
—

 
228

 
—

 
(92
)
Net loss
(28,443
)
 
(6,150
)
 
(4,119
)
 
—

 
(38,712
)
Less: net income related to noncontrolling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
(286
)
 
(286
)
Net loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(28,443
)
 
$
(6,150
)
 
$
(4,119
)
 
$
(286
)
 
$
(38,998
)

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations 
 Three Months June 30, 2015

Parent Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenues, net
$
29,495

 
$
32,133

 
$
13,285

 
$
(7,894
)
 
$
67,019

Cost of revenues
23,264

 
31,687

 
11,999

 
(7,849
)
 
59,101

Gross profit
6,231

 
446

 
1,286

 
(45
)
 
7,918

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
4,742

 
337

 
768

 
—

 
5,847

Research and development
583

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
583

Selling and marketing
1,338

 
4

 
33

 
(45
)
 
1,330

Total operating expenses
6,663

 
341

 
801

 
(45
)
 
7,760

Operating (loss) income
(432
)
 
105

 
485

 
—

 
158

Interest expense, net
(9,172
)
 
(109
)
 
(94
)
 
—

 
(9,375
)
Other (expense) income, net
(367
)
 
143

 
(109
)
 
2

 
(331
)
Net (loss) income before income taxes
(9,971
)
 
139

 
282

 
2

 
(9,548
)
Income tax expense
342

 
—

 
349

 
—

 
691

Net (loss) income
(10,313
)
 
139

 
(67
)
 
2

 
(10,239
)
Less: net loss related to noncontrolling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
118

 
118

Net (loss) income attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(10,313
)
 
$
139

 
$
(67
)
 
$
120

 
$
(10,121
)

22
Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Parent 
Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenues, net
$
43,773

 
$
45,223

 
$
21,071

 
$
(14,400
)
 
$
95,667

Cost of revenues
62,029

 
33,230

 
20,031

 
(14,219
)
 
101,071

Gross (loss) profit
(18,256
)
 
11,993

 
1,040

 
(181
)
 
(5,404
)
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
12,100

 
18

 
535

 
—

 
12,653

Research and development
1,330

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,330

Selling and marketing
4,430

 
213

 
66

 
(181
)
 
4,528

Loss on idle aircraft
—

 
7,815

 
—

 
—

 
7,815

Impairment of goodwill
—

 
—

 
4,523

 
—

 
4,523

Impairment of other assets
1,480

 
4,647

 
—

 
—

 
6,127

Total operating expenses
19,340

 
12,693

 
5,124

 
(181
)
 
36,976

Operating loss
(37,596
)
 
(700
)
 
(4,084
)
 
—

 
(42,380
)
Interest expense, net
(18,458
)
 
(175
)
 
(89
)
 
—

 
(18,722
)
Other (expense) income, net
(1,703
)
 
11

 
653

 
—

 
(1,039
)
Net loss before income taxes
(57,757
)
 
(864
)
 
(3,520
)
 
—

 
(62,141
)
Income tax expense
2,373

 
—

 
205

 
—

 
2,578

Net loss
(60,130
)
 
(864
)
 
(3,725
)
 
—

 
(64,719
)
Less: net income related to noncontrolling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
(263
)
 
(263
)
Net loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(60,130
)
 
$
(864
)
 
$
(3,725
)
 
$
(263
)
 
$
(64,982
)

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Parent 
Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Revenues, net
53,823

 
67,477

 
26,177

 
(16,496
)
 
$
130,981

Cost of revenues
48,461

 
64,516

 
25,516

 
(16,417
)
 
122,076

Gross profit
5,362

 
2,961

 
661

 
(79
)
 
8,905

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
10,779

 
151

 
1,468

 
—

 
12,398

Research and development
1,461

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,461

Selling and marketing
3,045

 
54

 
65

 
(79
)
 
3,085

Impairment of goodwill
—

 
49,823

 
—

 
—

 
49,823

Impairment of other assets
3,441

 
2,749

 
953

 
—

 
7,143

Total operating expenses
18,726

 
52,777

 
2,486

 
(79
)
 
73,910

Operating loss
(13,364
)
 
(49,816
)
 
(1,825
)
 
—

 
(65,005
)
Interest expense, net
(18,201
)
 
(186
)
 
(200
)
 
—

 
(18,587
)
Other (expense) income, net
(2,110
)
 
162

 
296

 
(4
)
 
(1,656
)
Net loss before income taxes
(33,675
)
 
(49,840
)
 
(1,729
)
 
(4
)
 
(85,248
)
Income tax (benefit) expense
(199
)
 
—

 
273

 
—

 
74

Net loss
(33,476
)
 
(49,840
)
 
(2,002
)
 
(4
)
 
(85,322
)
Less: net loss related to noncontrolling interests
—

 
—

 
—

 
231

 
231

Net loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(33,476
)
 
$
(49,840
)
 
$
(2,002
)
 
$
227

 
$
(85,091
)

23
Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Parent
 Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(60,130
)
 
$
(864
)
 
$
(3,725
)
 
$
—

 
$
(64,719
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
9,894

 
9,134

 
60

 
—

 
19,088

Impairment of goodwill
—

 
—

 
4,523

 
—

 
4,523

Impairment of other assets
1,480

 
4,647

 
—

 
—

 
6,127

Amortization of debt issuance costs
1,238

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,238

Amortization of debt discount
277

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
277

Stock-based compensation
137

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
137

Deferred income taxes
1,461

 
—

 
336

 
—

 
1,797

Loss (gain) on sales of aircraft and other property and equipment
231

 
933

 
(9
)
 
—

 
1,155

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
373

 
1,533

 
(3,017
)
 
—

 
(1,111
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(696
)
 
192

 
(599
)
 
—

 
(1,103
)
Aircraft parts, net
(1,119
)
 
(2,906
)
 
166

 
—

 
(3,859
)
Other assets
(14
)
 
981

 
16

 
—

 
983

Aircraft held for sale
(1,359
)
 
(1,741
)
 
(583
)
 
—

 
(3,683
)
Accounts payable
6,408

 
7,713

 
540

 
—

 
14,661

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
18,624

 
(17,239
)
 
1,970

 
—

 
3,355

Other long-term liabilities
(1,724
)
 
3,553

 
(4
)
 
—

 
1,825

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(24,919
)
 
5,936

 
(326
)
 
—

 
(19,309
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of aircraft and property, plant and equipment
(615
)
 
(5,464
)
 
(6
)
 
—

 
(6,085
)
Proceeds from sales of aircraft and other property and equipment
6,401

 
—

 
467

 
—

 
6,868

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
155

 
—

 
155

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
5,786

 
(5,464
)
 
616

 
—

 
938

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit facility payments
(56,643
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(56,643
)
Credit facility borrowings
79,891

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
79,891

Long-term debt principal payments, including capital lease payments
(3,896
)
 
(441
)
 
—

 
—

 
(4,337
)
Debt issuance costs
(276
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(276
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
19,076

 
(441
)
 
—

 
—

 
18,635

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
841

 
—

 
49

 
—

 
890

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
784

 
31

 
339

 
—

 
1,154

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
13

 
71

 
2,045

 
—

 
2,129

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
797

 
$
102

 
$
2,384

 
$
—

 
$
3,283


24
Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Parent
Company
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Consolidating
Entries and
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(33,476
)
 
$
(49,840
)
 
$
(2,002
)
 
$
(4
)
 
$
(85,322
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
10,898

 
7,399

 
419

 
—

 
18,716

Impairment of goodwill
—

 
49,823

 
—

 
—

 
49,823

Impairment of other assets
3,441

 
2,749

 
953

 
—

 
7,143

Amortization of debt issuance costs
1,254

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,254

Amortization of debt discount
406

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
406

Stock-based compensation
97

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
97

Deferred income taxes
(1,627
)
 
—

 
(60
)
 
—

 
(1,687
)
(Gain) loss on sales of aircraft and other property and equipment
(91
)
 
(204
)
 
24

 
—

 
(271
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(2,984
)
 
2,537

 
(4,029
)
 
4

 
(4,472
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
433

 
(141
)
 
(104
)
 
22

 
210

Aircraft parts, net
977

 
512

 
(758
)
 
—

 
731

Other assets
500

 
(1,964
)
 
(151
)
 
—

 
(1,615
)
Accounts payable
1,034

 
(287
)
 
(722
)
 
—

 
25

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
9,097

 
(12,856
)
 
3,515

 
(22
)
 
(266
)
Other liabilities
263

 
(125
)
 
—

 
—

 
138

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(9,778
)
 
(2,397
)
 
(2,915
)
 
—


(15,090
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of aircraft and property, plant and equipment
(9,770
)
 
(1,997
)
 
(72
)
 
—

 
(11,839
)
Proceeds from sale of aircraft
—

 
4,500

 
—

 
—

 
4,500

Restricted cash
—

 
—

 
124

 
—

 
124

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(9,770
)
 
2,503

 
52

 
—

 
(7,215
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Credit facility payments
(73,182
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(73,182
)
Credit facility borrowings
97,553

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
97,553

Long-term debt principal payments, including capital lease payments
(3,001
)
 
(339
)
 
—

 
—

 
(3,340
)
Other long-term borrowings
(84
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(84
)
Debt issuance costs
(137
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(137
)
Shares withheld for payment of taxes
(32
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(32
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
21,117

 
(339
)
 
—

 
—


20,778

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
(1,560
)
 
—

 
(244
)
 
—

 
(1,804
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
9

 
(233
)
 
(3,107
)
 
—

 
(3,331
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
7

 
274

 
4,816

 
—

 
5,097

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
16

 
$
41

 
$
1,709

 
$
—

 
$
1,766



25
Table of Contents

NOTE 10—SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In August 2016, we initiated a restructuring plan designed to right-size the Company’s staffing to meet current revenue levels. We are implementing a reduction-in-force of a combination of employees and contractors totaling approximately 135, which is expected to be completed by September 30, 2016. The terminated employees will be granted termination benefits, which will be expensed and paid in the third quarter on the date of employee communication. The total cost of these termination benefits is expected to range between $0.5 million and $1.0 million.

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Certain statements contained in this Item 2 may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statements, as discussed more fully in Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

OVERVIEW OF THE BUSINESS

Erickson Incorporated is a vertically integrated aerial services company engaged in the manufacture, maintenance and repair and the operation of aircraft globally. We generate revenues and cash flows from providing aerial and specialized manufacturing and maintenance services to commercial and governmental entities worldwide. Our vertically-integrated manufacturing capability provides unique manufacturing and maintenance, repair and overhaul (“MRO”) services for the Aircrane and other legacy aircraft platforms, related components, and aftermarket support. Our operations span the globe with a presence on six continents and 26 aircraft deployed outside of North America as of June 30, 2016.

To provide aerial services to our customers, the aircraft we utilize are either owned or leased. Aircraft are subject to varying levels of required scheduled maintenance and inspections, which can be based on flight hours or lapse of time. As a result of planned or unplanned maintenance, aircraft are out-of-service from time-to-time. Throughout the course of any given year, we may remove aircraft from service for maintenance or to sell, or add aircraft to the fleet either through our own manufacturing facility or through a purchase or lease. As of December 31, 2015, we had 15 aircraft held for sale, with 11 as of June 30, 2016.

The Company’s fleet consisted of the following as of June 30, 2016:

Type:
 
Heavy lift helicopters, known as ‘Aircranes’
20

Rotor-wing aircraft:

Light lift helicopters
9

Medium lift helicopters
33

Fixed-wing aircraft
7

 
69


Our fleet of 69 aircraft includes 4 idle aircraft and 11 aircraft that are held for sale as of June 30, 2016.

Our aircraft utilization, which is calculated as the number of days on contract as a percentage of total available days, was as follows for the periods presented:

26
Table of Contents

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Rotor wing:
30.5
%
 
36.5
%
 
32.3
%
 
36.9
%
Heavy lift
33.7

 
45.7

 
39.6

 
48.2

Medium lift

34.5

 
39.5

 
34.6

 
39.4

Light lift
11.3

 
11.8

 
11.7

 
10.9

Fixed wing
41.3

 
31.3

 
35.9

 
32.5

Total fleet combined
31.5

 
35.9

 
32.7

 
36.3


In recent periods, our financial results have been negatively affected by reduced demand for our services due to a variety of factors including economic conditions in our end markets such as the oil and gas industry, the loss of our small business size status which led to our inability to secure new firefighting contracts with the U.S. Forest Service, as well as the sustained reduction of U.S. government military activities in Afghanistan.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we have incurred a net loss of $65.0 million, compared with a net loss of $85.1 million during the same period of 2015. The $20.1 million decline in our net loss is largely due to lower goodwill impairment charges, with $4.5 million recognized in the six months of 2016 related to our Commercial Aviation Services segment compared to $49.8 million recognized in the same period of 2015 related to our Global Defense and Security segment.

Declines in gross profit from our Commercial Aviation Services and Global Defense and Security segments, combined with a loss incurred related to idle leased aircraft in the first half of 2016 and an income tax benefit realized in the first half of 2015 related to the goodwill and other asset impairment charges, contributed to an increase in our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2016 when compared with the six months ended June 30, 2015.


27
Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents our consolidated operating results for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Revenues, net:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Aviation Services
$
20,991

 
41.3
 %
 
$
34,319

 
51.2
 %
 
$
40,937

 
42.8
 %
 
$
60,572

 
46.2
 %
Global Defense and Security
21,371

 
42.0

 
28,391

 
42.4

 
40,440

 
42.3

 
61,266

 
46.8

Manufacturing and MRO
8,476

 
16.7

 
4,309

 
6.4

 
14,290

 
14.9

 
9,143

 
7.0

Total revenues
50,838

 
100.0

 
67,019

 
100.0

 
95,667

 
100.0

 
130,981

 
100.0

Cost of revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Aviation Services(1)
26,438

 
125.9

 
30,633

 
89.3

 
50,742

 
124.0

 
61,573

 
101.7

Global Defense and Security(1)
20,620

 
96.5

 
26,274

 
92.5

 
40,648

 
100.5

 
54,787

 
89.4

Manufacturing and MRO(1)
5,110

 
60.3

 
2,194

 
50.9

 
9,681

 
67.7

 
5,716

 
62.5

Total cost of revenues
52,168

 
102.6

 
59,101

 
88.2

 
101,071

 
105.6

 
122,076

 
93.2

Gross (loss) profit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Aviation Services(1)
(5,447
)
 
(25.9
)
 
3,686

 
10.7

 
(9,805
)
 
(24.0
)
 
(1,001
)
 
(1.7
)
Global Defense and Security(1)
751

 
3.5

 
2,117

 
7.5

 
(208
)
 
(0.5
)
 
6,479

 
10.6

Manufacturing and MRO(1)
3,366

 
39.7

 
2,115

 
49.1

 
4,609

 
32.3

 
3,427

 
37.5

Gross (loss) profit
(1,330
)
 
(2.6
)
 
7,918

 
11.8

 
(5,404
)
 
(5.6
)
 
8,905

 
6.8

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative
6,161

 
12.1

 
5,847

 
8.7

 
12,653

 
13.2

 
12,398

 
9.5

Research and development
699

 
1.4

 
583

 
0.9

 
1,330

 
1.4

 
1,461

 
1.1

Selling and marketing
2,646

 
5.2

 
1,330

 
2.0

 
4,528

 
4.7

 
3,085

 
2.4

Loss on idle aircraft
7,815

 
15.4

 
—

 
—

 
7,815

 
8.2

 
—

 
—

Impairment of goodwill
4,523

 
8.9

 
—

 
—

 
4,523

 
4.7

 
49,823

 
38.0

Impairment of other assets
6,127

 
12.1

 
—

 
—

 
6,127

 
6.4

 
7,143

 
5.5

Total operating expenses
27,971

 
55.0

 
7,760

 
11.6

 
36,976

 
38.7

 
73,910

 
56.4

Operating loss
(29,301
)
 
(57.6
)
 
158

 
0.2

 
(42,380
)
 
(44.3
)
 
(65,005
)
 
(49.6
)
Interest expense, net
(9,475
)
 
(18.6
)
 
(9,375
)
 
(14.0
)
 
(18,722
)
 
(19.6
)
 
(18,587
)
 
(14.2
)
Other expense, net
(28
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(331
)
 
(0.5
)
 
(1,039
)
 
(1.1
)
 
(1,656
)
 
(1.3
)
Net loss before income tax (benefit) expense
(38,804
)
 
(76.3
)
 
(9,548
)
 
(14.2
)
 
(62,141
)
 
(65.0
)
 
(85,248
)
 
(65.1
)
Income tax (benefit) expense
(92
)
 
(0.2
)
 
691

 
1.0

 
2,578

 
2.7

 
74

 
0.1

Net loss
(38,712
)
 
(76.1
)
 
(10,239
)
 
(15.3
)
 
(64,719
)
 
(67.7
)
 
(85,322
)
 
(65.1
)
Less: net (income) loss related to noncontrolling interests
(286
)
 
(0.6
)
 
118

 
0.2

 
(263
)
 
(0.3
)
 
231

 
0.2

Net loss attributable to Erickson Incorporated
$
(38,998
)
 
(76.7
)
 
$
(10,121
)
 
(15.1
)
 
$
(64,982
)
 
(67.9
)
 
$
(85,091
)
 
(65.0
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Percentage presented is of respective segment revenues.


28
Table of Contents

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared with the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015

Revenues, net decreased $16.2 million, or 24.1% to $50.8 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $67.0 million in the second quarter of 2015.

Commercial Aviation Services revenues decreased $13.3 million, or 38.8%, to $21.0 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $34.3 million in the second quarter of 2015, primarily due to decreases of $5.9 million due to the loss of the United States Forestry Service firefighting contract, $5.8 million related to the oil and gas industry, and $3.2 million as a result of construction projects in Asia for the second quarter of 2015 that did not occur in the second quarter of 2016. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in firefighting activity in Greece.

Global Defense and Security revenues decreased $7.0 million, or 24.7%, to $21.4 million for the second quarter of 2016 from $28.4 million in the second quarter of 2015, primarily due to decreases of $5 million related to the ending of U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) contracts in Afghanistan and Hawaii and $2 million related to a reduction in scope of aerial services transporting passengers and cargo in Afghanistan.

Manufacturing and MRO revenues increased $4.2 million, or 96.7%, to $8.5 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $4.3 million in the second quarter of 2015. This increase was driven primarily by aircraft refurbishment activity for the U.S. government, additional Aircrane component overhaul activity, and increased fire tank manufacturing for external fixed-wing customers.

Cost of revenues decreased $6.9 million, or 11.7%, to $52.2 million for the second quarter of 2016 from $59.1 million for the second quarter of 2015.

Commercial Aviation Services costs of revenues were $26.4 million, or 125.9% of revenues for the segment in the second quarter of 2016, compared with $30.6 million, or 89.3% of revenues for the segment in the second quarter of 2015. The increase as a percent of revenues was primarily due to the high operating leverage of the commercial business as aircraft leases, field maintenance, pilots, and depreciation are fixed costs.

Global Defense and Security costs of revenues were $20.6 million, or 96.5%, of revenues for the segment in the second quarter of 2016, compared with $26.3 million, or 92.5%, of revenues for the segment in the second quarter of 2015. The increase as a percent of revenues was primarily due to the end of higher margin DoD contracts.

Manufacturing and MRO costs of revenues were $5.1 million, or 60.3% of revenues for the segment in the second quarter of 2016, compared with $2.2 million, or 50.9% in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease as a percent of revenues was primarily due to a change in the mix of revenue sources, including the effects of a lower margin on fire tank manufacturing.

General and administrative expense increased $0.3 million, or 5.4%, to $6.2 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $5.8 million in the second quarter of 2015, which was primarily due to higher bad debt expense and severance costs, combined with the write-off of software upgrade costs in the second quarter of 2016.

Sales and marketing expense increased $1.3 million, or 98.9%, to $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2015, which was primarily due to increased sales efforts.

Loss on idle aircraft of $7.8 million relates to leased aircraft that we have ceased to use in operations as a result of continued efforts to rationalize our aircraft fleet. The Company recorded the remaining lease liability related to these leased idle aircraft in the second quarter of 2016. There was no such loss in the second quarter of 2015.

Impairment of goodwill was $4.5 million in the second quarter of 2016, which relates to our decision to sell our Brazilian subsidiary and resulted in the recognition of an impairment charge related to our Commercial Aviation Services segment. There was no such impairment charge in the second quarter of 2015.

Impairment of other assets of $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2016 is largely the result of the write-down of the carrying amount of certain aircraft to their estimated fair value less the costs to sell, which was done in connection with the reclassification of these aircraft to held for sale. We also recognized additional impairments for aircraft previously classified as held for sale as a result of ongoing declines in market values. One of our major competitors filed for Chapter 11 reorganization

29
Table of Contents

in the second quarter, which was a contributing factor to the decline in market values for aircraft in our industry. No such impairment charge was recorded in the second quarter of 2015.

Other expense, net decreased $0.3 million, or 91.5%, and consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 

2016
 
2015
 
Change
Other expense, net:
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of debt issuance costs
$
(588
)
 
$
(630
)
 
$
42

Unrealized foreign exchange loss, net
104

 
57

 
47

Realized foreign exchange (gain) loss, net
(165
)
 
15

 
(180
)
Miscellaneous income, net
621

 
227

 
394

 
$
(28
)
 
$
(331
)
 
$
303


The increase in miscellaneous income, net is largely due to the receipt of dividends in the second quarter of 2016 in the amount of $0.5 million related to a foreign investment.

Income taxes was a benefit of $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2016 compared with expense of $0.7 million in the second quarter of 2015. The change of $0.8 million is primarily due to the full valuation allowance taken beginning in 2015 against the Company’s deferred tax assets in the U.S., Brazil, and Italy.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Revenues, net decreased $35.3 million, or 27.0% to $95.7 million in the first half of 2016 from $131.0 million in the first half of 2015.

Commercial Aviation Services revenues decreased $19.6 million, or 32.4%, to $40.9 million in the first half of 2016 from $60.6 million in the first half of 2015, primarily due to decreases of $12.5 million related to the oil and gas industry, $5.9 million due to the loss of the United States Forestry Service firefighting contract, and $2.9 million as a result of construction projects in Asia for the first half of 2015 that did not occur in the first half of 2016. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in firefighting activity in Greece and new construction projects in India for 2016.

Global Defense and Security revenues decreased $20.8 million, or 34.0%, to $40.4 million for the first half of 2016 from $61.3 million in the first half of 2015, primarily due to the ending of contracts and, to a lesser degree, a reduction in scope of DoD activity.

Manufacturing and MRO revenues increased $5.1 million, or 56.3%, to $14.3 million in the first half of 2016 from $9.1 million in the first half of 2015. This increase was driven primarily by fire tank manufacturing activity in 2016, the refurbishment of two aircraft for the U.S. government in 2016 and an increase in aircraft part sales.

Cost of revenues decreased $21.0 million, or 17.2%, to $101.1 million for the first half of 2016 from $122.1 million for the first half of 2015.

Commercial Aviation Services costs of revenues were $50.7 million, or 124.0% of revenues for the segment in the first half of 2016, compared with $61.6 million, or 101.7% of revenues for the segment in the first half of 2015. The increase as a percent of revenues was primarily due to lower revenues on a static cost base.

Global Defense and Security costs of revenues were $40.6 million, or 100.5%, of revenues for the segment in the first half of 2016, compared with $54.8 million, or 89.4%, of revenues for the segment in the first half of 2015. The increase as a percent of revenues was primarily due to the end of higher margin DoD contracts.

Manufacturing and MRO costs of revenues were $9.7 million, or 67.7% of revenues for the segment in the first half of 2016, compared with $5.7 million, or 62.5% in the first half of 2015. The decrease as a percent of revenues was primarily due to a change in the mix of revenue sources.


30
Table of Contents

General and administrative expense increased $0.3 million, or 2.1%, to $12.7 million in the first half of 2016 from $12.4 million in the first half of 2015, which was primarily due to a increases in bad debt expense and supply chain costs. Such increases were partially offset by restructuring costs incurred in the first half of 2015.

Selling and marketing expense increased $1.4 million, or 46.8%, to $4.5 million in the first half of 2016 from $3.1 million in the first half of 2015. Such increase was primarily due to an increase in sales efforts, partially offset by cost reductions in marketing.

Loss on idle aircraft of $7.8 million relates to leased aircraft that we have ceased to use in operations as a result of continued efforts to rationalize our aircraft fleet. The Company recorded the remaining lease liability related to these leased idle aircraft in the second quarter of 2016. There was no such loss in the first half of 2015.

Impairment of goodwill was $4.5 million in the first half of 2016, which resulted from a transaction entered into to dispose of its wholly-owned Brazilian subsidiary and the recognition of an impairment charge related to our Commercial Aviation Services segment. This compares to $49.8 million recognized in the first half of 2015, which relates to our goodwill impairment analysis performed as of March 31, 2015 and resulted in the recognition of an impairment charge related to our Global Defense and Security segment.

Impairment of other assets of $6.1 million in the first half of 2016 and $7.1 million in the first half of 2015 largely relates to the write-down of the carrying amount of certain aircraft to their estimated fair value less the costs to sell, which was done in connection with the reclassification of these aircraft to held for sale.

Other expense, net decreased $0.6 million, or 37.3%, to $1.0 million in the first half of 2016 from $1.7 million in the first half of 2015 and consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 

2016
 
2015
 
Change
Other expense, net:
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of debt issuance costs
$
(1,239
)
 
$
(1,254
)
 
$
15

Unrealized foreign exchange loss, net
(313
)
 
(379
)
 
66

Realized foreign exchange loss, net
(180
)
 
(53
)
 
(127
)
Miscellaneous income, net
693

 
30

 
663

 
$
(1,039
)
 
$
(1,656
)
 
$
617


The increase in miscellaneous income, net is due to the receipt of dividends in the second quarter of 2016 in the amount of $0.5 million related to a foreign investment.

Income tax expense was $2.6 million in the first half of 2016 compared with $0.1 million in the first half of 2015. The increase of $2.5 million is primarily due to the net benefit realized as a result of the impairment recorded in the first half of 2015 and the recognition of a valuation allowance position against U.S. deferred tax assets.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity are borrowings available under our $140.0 million revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”), corporate credit cards, current balances of cash and cash equivalents and cash raised from other liquidity initiatives including asset sales and/or sale leaseback transactions. Our primary cash needs are funding working capital requirements, debt service payments, and capital expenditures. To the extent that we hold any cash and cash equivalents in excess of our needs, we generally hold such cash in interest bearing accounts with financial institutions.

Our current and future liquidity is greatly dependent upon our operating results and on our continuing ability to access funding under our Credit Facility. In recent periods, our financial results have been negatively affected by reduced demand for our services due to a variety of factors including economic conditions in our end markets such as the oil and gas industry, the loss of our small business size status which led to our inability to secure new firefighting contracts with the U.S. Forest Service, as well as the sustained reduction of U.S. government military activities in Afghanistan. A small number of customers comprise a significant portion of our revenue, several of which are U.S. and foreign government agencies or entities, and our cash flows depend on their sustained level of expenditure as well as being able to collect our receivables from them. If we cannot generate

31
Table of Contents

sufficient cash from operations to comply with our debt service obligations, we will need to refinance these debt obligations, obtain additional financing, sell assets, or file for bankruptcy.

As of June 30, 2016, we had a working capital deficit of $7.4 million, which was largely driven by a failure to grow our business. In addition, we had $355.0 million of senior notes payable, which bear interest at 8.25% per annum, are second priority senior secured obligations, and are due in 2020 (“2020 Senior Notes”). In accordance with the terms of the indenture under which the 2020 Senior Notes were issued, interest is due and payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1. We made an interest payment of $14.6 million on April 29, 2016, and absent a change in our capital structure, an interest payment of $14.6 million will be required on or by November 1, 2016. With approximately $3 million in liquidity under our existing Credit Facility, we are working with outside parties to obtain new financing to provide additional liquidity. If we are not successful at restructuring the business, which includes addressing the capital structure and cost structure of the Company, and securing new financing, the Company will be unable to fund the $14.6 million interest payment due on November 1, 2016. In such circumstances, we may be forced to seek protection from creditors under laws governing insolvency.
 
As of June 30, 2016, our corporate credit card limit was $5.5 million, of which we had borrowed $4.7 million. As of July 27, 2016, the lender reduced the corporate credit card limit to $3.0 million.

Our revolving Credit Facility is an asset based loan arrangement and our ability to draw on our Credit Facility to fund our liquidity needs is limited by a number of factors including borrowing “availability” as determined based upon the amount of eligible collateral to support the borrowing base. In addition, the lenders under our revolving Credit Facility have imposed a requirement that we maintain a certain level of unused borrowing capacity, known as “Excess Availability,” which further limits our ability to access funding under the Credit Facility. By the terms of Amendment 13 to the Credit Facility, dated July 22, 2016, the required Excess Availability was set at $10.0 million for the period from July 25, 2016 through August 15, 2016; with increases in Excess Availability required for subsequent periods ($12.0 million for the period from August 16, 2016 through August 22, 2016; $13.5 million for the period from August 23, 2016 through August 29, 2016; $17.5 million for the period from August 30, 2016 through October 2, 2016; and $20.0 million for the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016). The effect of these increases in Excess Availability is to step-down the amount that we may borrow under the Credit Facility over time. The lenders under our Credit Facility may adjust the required levels of Excess Availability in subsequent amendments to the Credit Facility. See “-Description of Indebtedness-Credit Facility” for more information.

In addition, in connection with entering into Amendment 13 to the Credit Facility, the lenders under the Credit Facility have requested we seek a refinancing of our Credit Facility in its entirety as soon as practicable and have required the Company to meet short term progress milestones related to such refinancing effort beginning in late July and early August, 2016. In addition, the lenders under the existing Credit Facility are seeking to impose certain incentive fees tied to the timing of any such refinancing, commencing with a fee of $3.5 million if the facility is not refinanced by August 29, 2016, an additional fee of $1.5 million if the facility is not refinanced by September 12, 2016, and additional fees of $0.5 million for each incremental two week period after September 12, 2016 in which the Credit Facility is not refinanced thereafter. If we are successful in refinancing the Credit Facility, we may seek waiver or reduction of such fees should any of them become applicable and if we are not able to meet certain of the milestones related to the refinancing effort, we may seek an extension of time or a modification or waiver of the terms of such milestones, but there can be no assurance that waiver of such fees or any extension, modification or waiver of milestones will be available.

We have hired an investment bank and a legal firm to assist in the exploration of strategic alternatives one of which initiatives includes the refinancing of our Credit Facility. Although we are actively seeking a refinancing of the Credit Facility with certain new prospective lenders that we have identified, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful or that the refinancing of our Credit Facility would be on terms that are favorable to us.

If the Company defaults under its existing Credit Facility we may experience cross defaults under other indebtedness including the 2020 Senior Notes. In such circumstances, we may be forced to seek protection from creditors under laws governing insolvency.

Depending on our near term operating results, as well as our progress with short term cash and liquidity initiatives, we may have insufficient liquidity to support our operations and we may be unable to refinance our Credit Facility and/or we may be required to refinance or restructure other portions of our outstanding indebtedness in whole or in part including the 2020 Senior Notes.

With the assistance of our advisors, our cash and liquidity initiatives include not only seeking a refinancing of our Credit Facility but various other efforts with respect to the sale of assets, reduction of costs and streamlining of operations including efforts to rationalize our aircraft fleet, including divesting of certain aircraft and related aircraft parts, and sale-leaseback

32
Table of Contents

transactions for certain owned assets. There can be no assurance that our initiatives to address our liquidity issues will be successful.

Liquidity

The following chart is a condensed presentation of our statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
$
2,129

 
$
5,097

Net cash provided by (used in):
 
 
 
Operating activities
(19,309
)
 
(15,090
)
Investing activities
938

 
(7,215
)
Financing activities
18,635

 
20,778

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
890

 
(1,804
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
1,154

 
(3,331
)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
3,283

 
$
1,766


Cash flows from operating activities—Cash flows from operating activities are generally determined by the amount and timing of cash received from customers and payments made to vendors. The increase in net cash used in operating activities to $19.3 million in the first half of 2016 from $15.1 million in the first half of 2015 was primarily due to an increase in year over year operating losses, contributing to the degradation of our liquidity position.

Cash flows from investing activities—Cash flows related to investing activities consist primarily of the purchase of spare parts related to the maintenance of our aircraft fleet and proceeds from sales of aircraft and other property and equipment. The change in cash flows from investing activities was primarily due to lower capital expenditures in the first half of 2016 when compared with the comparable period of 2015. In addition, the Company had proceeds received from the sale of aircraft and other property and equipment of $6.9 million during the first half of 2016, compared with $4.5 million for the comparable period of 2015.

Cash flows from financing activities—Financing activities provide supplemental cash for both day-to-day operations and capital requirements as needed. During the first half of 2016, net cash provided by financing activities consisted of the net Credit Facility borrowings of $23.2 million, partially offset by long-term debt and capital lease payments of $4.3 million. During the first half of 2015, net cash provided by financing activities consisted of net Credit Facility borrowings of $24.4 million, partially offset by long-term debt and capital lease payments of $3.3 million.

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents—This represents the effect that foreign currency exchange rates relative to the US dollar have on our cash and cash equivalents resulting from our foreign currency transactions. The currencies which influence the effect on our cash and cash equivalents consist of Canadian dollars (C$), Euros (€), Brazilian Real (R$) and Turkish Lira (₤). For the first half of 2016, foreign currency exchange rates had a $0.9 million favorable impact on our cash and cash equivalents, compared with a $1.8 million unfavorable impact in the first half of 2015.

Description of Indebtedness

The following summary of certain provisions of the instruments evidencing our material indebtedness does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, all of the provisions of the corresponding agreements, including the definitions of certain terms therein that are not otherwise defined in this Form 10-Q.

Credit Facility

Our $140.0 million Credit Facility, which matures in May 2018, supplements operating cash flow and provides a primary source of liquidity. Pursuant to the terms of the underlying credit agreement, the Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes and the issuance of standby letters of credit. As of June 30, 2016, we had borrowings outstanding of $121.3 million, letters of credit issued of $2.4 million, and available borrowing capacity of $6.2 million.


33
Table of Contents

The Company and each of the Company’s current and future, direct and indirect, material subsidiaries guarantee the indebtedness under the Credit Facility on a senior-secured first-lien basis. The Credit Facility includes mandatory prepayment requirements for certain types of transactions, including, but not limited to, requiring prepayment from proceeds that the Company receives as a result of certain asset sales, subject to certain exceptions, and proceeds from extraordinary receipts.

During 2016, the Company entered into numerous amendments to the Credit Facility. As a result, the terms of the Credit Facility contain, among other things, a requirement that a certain level of borrowing capacity be maintained, known as “Excess Availability,” which is as follows:

•
$10.0 million for the period from July 25, 2016 through August 15, 2016;
•
$12.0 million for the period from August 16, 2016 through August 22, 2016;
•
$13.5 million for the period from August 23, 2016 through August 29, 2016;
•
$17.5 million for the period from August 30, 2016 through October 2, 2016; and
•
$20.0 million for the period from October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

In addition, the fixed charge financial covenant period commencement date was delayed to any period on or after January 1, 2017 on which Excess Availability is less than $20 million as of such date and the interest rate was set at 550 basis points, or 5.5%, over the prime base rate or 650 basis points, or 6.5%, over the London Interbank Offered Rate, as applicable, resulting in an increase of 200 basis points, or 2%, over the highest chargeable rates prior to any amendments entered into during 2016.

The Company also entered into an amendment fee letter with the lenders under the Credit Facility in July 2016, which formalizes a requirement that the Company agrees to seek a refinancing of its Credit Facility in its entirety (the “Refinancing”) and requires the Company to meet short term progress milestones related to the Refinancing. In the event the Company is unable to refinance the Credit Facility in its entirety, and otherwise satisfy in full in cash all outstanding amounts and other obligations under the Credit Facility, the Company will be responsible to pay the following incentive fees:

•
$3.5 million if the Refinancing has not occurred on or before August 29, 2016;
•
An additional $1.5 million if the Refinancing has not occurred on or before September 12, 2016; and
•
An additional $500,000 each two weeks thereafter if the Refinancing has not occurred on or before September 26, 2016 and each second Monday thereafter, as applicable.

Long-term Debt

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding $355.0 million principal amount of its 2020 Senior Notes, which mature May 1, 2020. The 2020 Senior Notes are guaranteed by certain of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries and secured by second-position liens, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens, on substantially all of our existing and future assets that secure our Credit Facility.

The indenture under which the 2020 Senior Notes were issued limits our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) pay dividends or distributions, repurchase equity, prepay subordinated debt or make certain investments; (ii) incur additional debt or issue certain disqualified stock and preferred stock; (iii) incur liens on assets; (iv) merge or consolidate with another company or sell all or substantially all assets; (v) enter into transactions with affiliates; and (vi) allow to exist certain restrictions on the ability of the guarantors to pay dividends or make other payments to us.

Credit Ratings and Debt Covenants

The Company’s ratings by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) were last published in April 2016 and June 2016, respectively, with ratings and outlooks as follows:
 
Moody’s
 
S&P
Senior secured debt
Caa1
 
CCC
Issuer rating
Caa2
 
CCC
Outlook
Negative
 
Negative

Moody’s ratings reflect the Company’s credit profile which is based on projected credit metrics and a weak liquidity position characterized by negative free cash flows, a reliance on the revolving credit facility with limited availability. The negative outlook reflects Moody’s expectation of continuing execution risk in the Company’s strategy to turnaround its operations and the Company’s weak liquidity position.

34
Table of Contents


S&P’s ratings reflect current pressure on the Company’s liquidity and capital structure, which they believe is unsustainable over the long-term. The negative outlook reflects S&P’s view that there is significant risk the Company will undertake a debt restructuring that they would view as a distressed exchange, which S&P considers a default under their criteria.

Delisting Notices

On July 26, 2016, the Company received two letters from the Listing Qualifications staff of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) indicating that, (i) based upon the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock for the last 30 consecutive business days, the Company no longer meets the requirement to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), and (ii) based upon the Company’s market value of publicly held shares for the last 30 consecutive days, the Company no longer meets the requirement to maintain a minimum Market Value of Publicly Held Shares (“MVPHS”) of $5 million, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(C).

In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company has been provided a period of 180 calendar days, or until January 23, 2017, in which to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). In order to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock must be at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during this 180-day period. In the event that the Company does not regain compliance within this 180-day period, the Company may be eligible to seek an additional compliance period of 180 calendar days if it meets the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards, with the exception of the bid price requirements, and provide written notice to Nasdaq of its intent to cure the deficiency during this second compliance period by effecting a reverse stock split if necessary. However, if it appears to the Nasdaq Staff that the Company will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if the Company is otherwise not eligible, Nasdaq will provide notice to the Company that its common stock will be subject to delisting. In the event of such a notification, the Company may appeal the Nasdaq Staff’s determination to delist its securities, but there can be no assurance the Staff would grant the Company’s request for continued listing.

In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(D), the Company has been provided a period of 180 calendar days, or until January 23, 2017, in which to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(C). In order to regain compliance with the MVPHS requirement, the Company’s MVPHS must be at least $5 million for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during this 180-day period. In the event that the Company does not regain compliance within this 180-day period, Nasdaq will provide notice to the Company that its common stock will be subject to delisting. In the event of such a notification, the Company may appeal the Nasdaq Staff’s determination to delist its securities, but there can be no assurance the Staff would grant the Company’s request for continued listing.

The Notices do not result in the immediate delisting of the Company’s common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Company intends to monitor the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock and its MVPHS and consider its available options in the event that the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock remains below $1.00 per share or the Company’s MVPHS remains below $5 million. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement or the MVPHS requirement or maintain compliance with the other listing requirements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Our contractual obligations for 2016 and beyond are set forth in Part III, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016. Such obligations have not changed materially as of June 30, 2016.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our critical accounting policies are outlined in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016.


35
Table of Contents

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risk in the normal course of our business operations due to changes in interest rates, increase in cost of aircraft fuel, and our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Except for changes in interest rates discussed in “Description of Indebtedness” in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, there have been no other material changes to market risks affecting us from those set forth in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures included, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure. We have established a Disclosure Committee, consisting of certain members of management, to assist in this evaluation. The Disclosure Committee meets on a quarterly basis, and as needed.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), as of June 30, 2016. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, solely due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below:

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we identified a material weakness in our controls over accounting for the gain on sale and leaseback transactions and accounting for idle leased assets. Based upon that discovery, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective at a level that provides reasonable assurance as of the last day of the period covered by this report.
The material weakness in internal control over financial reporting resulted from the lack of controls which allowed for the misinterpretation of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 840, Leases, and ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. Regarding ASC 840, sale-leaseback accounting, was the lack of immediate recognition of a portion of the gain where the fair market value exceeds the present value of the future minimum lease payments. Regarding ASC 420, the lack of measuring the fair value of the leased assets that ceased to be used in the business. Specifically, we did not have adequate controls in place to properly identify and account for these transactions correctly.
To remediate the material weakness described above, the Company is evaluating the design of existing controls and procedures to properly apply sale-leaseback and “cease use” accounting. The material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of this material weakness will be completed prior to the end of fiscal year 2017.
Since the beginning of the quarter, the following changes in internal control related to the disclosure committee have occurred:

Incoming Members

- Chief Financial Officer

Outgoing Members

- Vice President of Operations
- Vice President of Manufacturing and MRO
- Vice President of Supply Chain
- Director of Finance - Global Defense and Security
- Director of Finance - Commercial Aviation Services
Except as noted above, there have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

36
Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.

For information regarding our legal proceedings, see Note 7 to our financial statements as of and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, which appear in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the reports we file with the SEC from time to time. Any of these risks could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Risks Relating to our Indebtedness

Our substantial indebtedness and significant debt service obligations could adversely affect our financial condition and impair our ability to grow and operate our business.

We have a substantial amount of debt and have significant debt service obligations. As of June 30, 2016, the principal amount of our total indebtedness was approximately $498.1 million, a majority of which is secured by liens on substantially all of our existing and future assets. We had a working capital deficiency of $7.4 million as of June 30, 2016.

The existence and terms of our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition by:

•
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;
•
increasing our vulnerability to generally adverse economic and industry conditions;
•
limiting our ability to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, research and development and other general corporate requirements;
•
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service payments on our debt;
•
limiting our flexibility to react to changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
•
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to any of our competitors that have less debt;
•
limiting our ability to borrow additional funds; and
•
requiring us to comply with financial and other restrictive covenants.

Our failure to comply with the covenants and agreements in connection with our Credit Facility and other requirements in connection with our debt could restrict our ability to access further funding under the Credit Facility and could result in a default or an event of default with respect to the Credit Facility, any of which events could materially and adversely affect our operating results and our financial condition.

Our ability to draw down borrowings under our Credit Facility depends in part on our compliance with financial and other covenants and agreements in connection with our Credit Facility. An inability to access funding from our Credit Facility could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make capital expenditures, on our results of operations and on our liquidity. Further, failure to comply with the covenants and other requirements in connection with our Credit Facility could constitute a default or an event of default, allowing the lenders under our Credit Facility to pursue various remedies and take various actions including blocking further borrowing under the Credit Facility and declaring the entire balance of any and all sums payable under the Credit Facility immediately due and payable. If a payment default or acceleration were to occur under our Credit Facility, holders of our 2020 Senior Notes would be permitted to accelerate the maturity of the 2020 Senior Notes.

Our revolving Credit Facility is an asset based loan arrangement and our ability to draw on our Credit Facility to fund our liquidity needs is limited by a number of factors including borrowing “availability” as determined based upon the amount of eligible collateral to support the borrowing base. In addition, the lenders under our revolving Credit Facility have imposed a requirement that we maintain a certain level of unused borrowing capacity, known as “Excess Availability” which further limits our ability to access funding under the Credit Facility. By the terms of Amendment 13 to the Credit Facility, dated July 22, 2016, the required Excess Availability was set at $10.0 million for the period from July 25, 2016 through August 15, 2016; with increases in Excess Availability required for subsequent periods ($12.0 million for the period from August 16, 2016 through August 22, 2016; $13.5 million for the period August 23, 2016 through August 29, 2016; $17.5 million for the period August 30, 2016 through October 2, 2016; and $20.0 million for the period October 3, 2016 through December 31, 2016). The effect of

37
Table of Contents

these increases in Excess Availability is to step-down the amount that we may borrow under the Credit Facility over time. The lenders under our Credit Facility may adjust the required levels of Excess Availability in subsequent amendments to the Credit Facility.

In addition, in connection with entering into Amendment 13 to the Credit Facility, the lenders under the Credit Facility have requested that we seek a refinancing of our Credit Facility in its entirety as soon as practicable and have required near term progress milestones related to such refinancing effort beginning in late July and early August, 2016. In addition, the lenders under the existing Credit Facility are seeking to impose certain incentive fees tied to the timing of any such refinancing commencing with a fee of $3.5 million if the facility is not refinanced by August 29, 2016, and an additional fee of $1.5 million if the facility is not refinanced by September 12, 2016 and additional fees of $0.5 million for each incremental period of two additional weeks after September 12, 2016 in which the Credit Facility is not refinanced thereafter.

We are seeking a refinancing of our Credit Facility; our efforts to refinance the Credit Facility may not be successful or if successful, the terms of such refinancing may not be as favorable to us as the terms that have historically governed our existing Credit Facility.

Although we are actively seeking a refinancing of the Credit Facility with certain new prospective lenders that we have identified, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful, that the refinancing of our Credit Facility would be on terms that are favorable to us or that we can complete a refinancing of the Credit Facility within the timeframe envisioned by the existing lenders under our Credit Facility in order to avoid fees that would otherwise be imposed under our Credit Facility for failure to complete the refinancing on or prior to August 29, 2016 or in subsequent periods thereafter.

We may not be able to achieve some of the strategic alternatives and initiatives that we choose to pursue in order to improve our liquidity position and raise additional funds.

With the assistance of our advisors, we are in the process of evaluating a range of strategic alternatives with respect to the Company and our business in order to improve our liquidity position and raise additional funds. One near term objective involves the refinancing of our Credit Facility, but we are also analyzing various other initiatives including raising additional funds through assets sales and sale leaseback transactions as well as other alternatives with respect to our additional indebtedness, including the 2020 Senior Notes, which may include a restructuring, additional financing or some combination of different transactions. Even if we are successful in refinancing our Credit Facility or raising additional funds, the terms available to us in connection with such initiative may be unfavorable to us such that the benefits of any transactions or financing that we undertake may have an adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and seek any potential refinancing of our indebtedness depends upon our ability to generate sufficient cash from our operations, financings or asset sales, which are subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles, seasonality and other factors, some of which may be beyond our control. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness, selling our assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. Our ability to restructure or refinance our indebtedness will depend on the conditions of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. The terms of existing or future debt instruments may also restrict us from adopting some of these alternatives. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default under our Credit Facility and the lenders under our 2020 Senior Notes and Credit Facility could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.

Our ability to obtain adequate financing or raise capital in the future may be limited.

We depend, in substantial part, upon borrowings under our Credit Facility to fund our operations and contractual commitments. A number of factors could cause us to incur increased borrowing costs and to have greater difficulty accessing public and private markets for debt. These factors include general economic conditions, disruptions or declines in the global capital markets, and our financial performance, outlook, or credit ratings. Additionally, our suppliers may require us to pay cash in advance or obtain letters of credit as a condition to selling us their products and services. If we cannot access financing when needed, and on acceptable terms, we may be unable to continue to fund our capital requirements or contractual commitments, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

38
Table of Contents


Changes in our credit ratings may adversely affect the price of our common stock and negatively impact our ability to refinance our debt.

Credit rating agencies continually review their ratings for the companies they follow. In April 2016, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded (i) our corporate family rating to “Caa1” from “B2,” (ii) our probability of default to “Caa1” from “B2,” and (iii) the debt rating of our 2020 Senior Notes from “Caa2” to “B3.” In June 2016, S&P Global Ratings reassigned (i) our company debt rating to “CCC+” and (ii) the debt rating of our 2020 Senior Notes to “CCC+” from “B-.” Both rating agencies have also placed our ratings on “negative outlook.” A further negative change in our ratings or the perception that such a change could occur may further adversely affect the market price of our securities, including our common stock and our 2020 Senior Notes.

Risks Relating to our Business

Our cash flow is highly dependent on demand for our services, which has decreased significantly in recent periods. There can be no assurances that our strategic efforts to improve our operating results and financial condition will be successful.

Our cash flow is highly dependent on demand for our services, which has decreased significantly in recent periods due to, among other factors, the sustained reduction of U.S. government military activities in Afghanistan. While we are actively seeking to expand and diversify our customer base and activities, there can be no assurances that these activities will be successful. Our plans to expand our business and activities, rationalize our fleet, manage our cash and liquidity and become more cost-efficient are subject to execution risk, and our weak liquidity position constrains the strategic opportunities available to us. We may be unable to replace or renew key defense and oil and gas contracts which formed the basis of our revenues in past periods in light of the challenging conditions faced by in those markets. In the event our strategic efforts are unsuccessful, or the benefits from such efforts are not realized within the timescales we envision, we may experience a material decline in our revenues and our financial condition and results of operations may be significantly adversely affected.

Foreign, domestic, federal, state and local government spending and mission priorities may change in a manner that materially and adversely affects our future revenues and limits our growth prospects.

Our business depends upon continued government expenditures on programs that we support. These expenditures have not remained constant over time. Current foreign and domestic government spending levels on programs that we support may not be sustainable as a result of changes in government leadership, policies, or priorities. These or other factors could cause government agencies and departments to reduce their purchases under contracts, exercise their right to terminate contracts, or not exercise options to renew contracts, any of which could cause us to lose revenue. A significant decline in overall government spending or a shift in expenditures away from agencies or programs that we support could cause a material decline in our revenues and harm our financial results.

Not being classified as a small business may adversely affect our ability to compete for some government contracts.

The North American Industry Classification Systems (“NAICS”) maintains industry and product specific codes that are utilized by the U.S. Small Business Administration as a basis for its size standards applicable to Federal government procurements. Businesses that meet the small business size standard for the relevant NAICS code are able to bid on small business set-aside contracts. Several of our contracts provide for differentiating factors in their award process which include small business status, performance records, safety records, and other factors. Several of these factors have been instrumental in us winning new work and continuing contracts. We do not currently qualify as a small business due to a determination by the U.S. Small Business Administration that our business would be considered as part of a family of businesses owned or controlled by our significant stockholder, and it is possible that we may not be classified as a small business in the future. Not being classified as a small business may adversely impact our eligibility for special small business programs and limit our ability to partner with other business entities that seek to team with small business entities as may be required under a specific contract.

The aviation services business is highly competitive.

Each of our segments faces significant competition. We compete for most of our work with other helicopter operators and, for some operations, with fixed-wing operators and ground-based alternatives. Many of our contracts are awarded after competitive bidding, and competition for those contracts is generally intense. We have several major competitors and numerous small competitors operating in our aerial services markets. Our competitors may at times undercut our prices or could develop the capability to manufacture products or provide services similar to products that we manufacture or services that we provide. We may not be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors and the competitive pressures we face may result in reduced revenues and market share. If we are unable to adjust our costs relative to our pricing, our profitability will

39
Table of Contents

suffer. In addition, some of our competitors may have greater financial and other resources than we do, and may therefore be able to react to market conditions and compete more effectively than we do.

We depend on a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues and our business is highly dependent on contracts that are with, directly or indirectly, various governmental agencies or entities that expose us to additional risks.

We derive a significant amount of our revenue from a small number of customers. Several of our largest customers are governmental agencies or entities. We face various risks related to the dependence of large portions of our business on governmental agencies or entities including that these relationships may be subject to budget or other financial constraints government procurement and contract bid practices and related requirements. Revenue derived from our firefighting contracts under which we are paid for hours flown is influenced by outside factors, such as seasonality and weather conditions, that may negatively impact our future revenue. Should we lose one of our major customers for any reason, we may be unable to identify new opportunities sufficient to avoid a reduction in revenues and our business and financial condition could suffer.

Our operations involve significant risks, which may result in hazards that may not be covered by our insurance or may increase the cost of our insurance.

The operation of aircraft inherently involves a high degree of risk. Hazards such as aircraft accidents, mechanical failures, collisions, fire, and adverse weather may result in loss of life, serious injury to employees and other persons, damage to property, losses of equipment and revenues, revocation of necessary governmental approvals and suspension or reduction of operations. Our insurance and indemnification arrangements may not cover all potential losses and are subject to deductibles, retentions, coverage limits, and coverage exceptions and, as a result, severe casualty losses or the expropriation or confiscation of significant assets could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

If we fail to maintain our safety record, our ability to attract new customers and maintain our existing customers would be harmed.

A favorable safety record is one of the primary factors a customer reviews in selecting an aviation provider. If we fail to maintain our safety and reliability record, our ability to attract new customers and maintain our current customers will be materially and adversely affected. In addition, safety violations could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny; increase our insurance rates and expense, which is a significant operating cost; or increase the difficulty of maintaining our existing insurance coverage in the future, which would adversely affect our operations.

Factors beyond our control, including weather and seasonal fluctuations, may reduce aircraft flight hours, which would affect our revenues and operations.

A significant portion of our operating revenue is dependent on actual flight hours, and a substantial portion of our direct costs are fixed. Flight hours could be negatively impacted by factors beyond our control and fluctuate depending on cyclical weather-related and seasonal limitations, which would affect our revenues and operations. In addition, generally our aircraft are not currently equipped to fly at night, reinforcing the seasonality of our business with more activity in the Northern Hemisphere during the summer months and less activity during the winter months. Poor visibility, high winds, and heavy precipitation can restrict the operation of helicopters and significantly reduce our flight hours. Reduced flight hours can have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Some of our arrangements with customers are short-term, ad hoc, or “call when needed” and may not be renewed.

We generate a portion of our revenues from arrangements with customers with terms of less than six months, ad hoc arrangements, and “call when needed” contracts. There is a risk that customers may not continue to seek the same level of services from us as they have in the past or that they will not renew these arrangements or terminate them at short notice. Under “call when needed” contracts, we pre-negotiate rates for providing services that customers may request that we perform (but which we are not typically obligated to perform) depending on their needs. The rates we charge for these contingent services are higher than the rates under stand-by arrangements, and we attempt to schedule our aircraft to maximize our revenue from these types of contracts. The ultimate value we derive from such contracts is subject to factors beyond our control, such as the severity and duration of fire seasons. In the past, several of our larger contracts have not been renewed for reasons unrelated to our performance, such as the financial condition of our customers or their decision to internalize the services we provided to them. If we are unable to retain or replace customers experiencing similar circumstances, our business and financial condition could suffer.


40
Table of Contents

We depend on a number of third parties in the implementation of our business including a small number of manufacturers for some of our aircraft components and negative factors affecting our business or our relationship with any of these third parties might have an adverse impact upon our business operations.

We rely on a number of third parties in the operation of our business including a number of third party suppliers. As an example, we rely on more than 200 supplier business units or locations for significant or critical components necessary for our business. A small number of manufacturers make some of the key components for our aircraft, and in some instances there is only a single manufacturer, although other manufacturers could be used if necessary for all of our components. If we experience any adverse developments with these third parties including with respect to our relationship to such third parties or in the ability of such third parties to fulfill our requirements, our operations could suffer. As an example, if any manufacturers of critical aircraft components were to experience production delays, or if the cost of components increases, we might experience an adverse impact on our business. If a manufacturer ceases production of a required component, we could incur significant costs in purchasing the right to manufacture those components or in developing and certifying a suitable replacement, and in manufacturing those components. Our liquidity constraints may also affect our relationships with third parties in a negative way that could have an adverse impact on our relationships with such third parties including if we are late in making payment to such third parties or if they change the terms on which they do business with us in the future.

Our failure to develop new technologies, and to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, could adversely affect our operations.

Our ability to grow depends in part on our development of new products or applications. Competitors may develop similar applications for their aircraft, which would increase our competition in providing aerial services. Not all of our products and applications have been, or may be, patented or otherwise legally protected. We rely upon intellectual property law, trade secret protection, and confidentiality and license agreements with our employees, clients, consultants, partners, and others to protect our new and existing intellectual property rights. If we are not able to adequately protect the inventions and intellectual property we have developed, in the U.S. and in foreign countries, or if any of our trade secrets, know-how, or other technologies were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We are exposed to risks associated with operating internationally.

We purchase products from and supply products to businesses located outside of the U.S. We also have significant operations outside the U.S. A number of risks inherent in international operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, including:

•
currency fluctuations, which can reduce our revenues for transactions denominated in non-U.S. currency or make our services relatively more expensive if denominated in U.S. currency;
•
difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations;
•
civil disturbances, government or financial instability, nationalization and expropriation of private assets, and the imposition of taxes or other charges by government authorities;
•
receivables from international customers;
•
risks associated with transporting our aircraft, including risks associated with piracy and adverse weather;
•
limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies;
•
uncertainties regarding required approvals or legal structures necessary to operate aircraft or provide our products and services in a given jurisdiction;
•
changes in regulatory structures or trade policies;
•
tariff and tax regulations including permanent establishment determinations by foreign governments;
•
compliance with all applicable export control laws and regulations of the U.S. and other countries;
•
difficulties in obtaining export and import licenses; and
•
the risk of government-financed competition.

While we have adopted and will continue to adopt measures to reduce the potential impact of losses resulting from the risks of doing business internationally, we may not be successful and any measures we take may not be adequate or the regions in which we operate may not continue to be stable enough to allow us to operate profitably or at all.


41
Table of Contents

We are subject to significant government regulation and may need to incur significant expenses to comply with new or more stringent governmental regulation.

The aerial services business is heavily regulated by the FAA in the U.S. and equivalent regulatory agencies in other countries. The FAA regulates the general operation of our aircraft, the process by which our aircraft are maintained, the components and systems that are installed in our aircraft, the qualification of our flight crews and maintenance personnel, and the specialized operations that we undertake. Our aircraft manufacturing and MRO operations are also subject to regulation by the FAA and other governmental authorities. The FAA regulates the design and manufacture of aircraft and aircraft systems and components. It also sets and enforces standards for the repair of aircraft, systems, and components and for the qualification of personnel performing these functions. Our operations in other countries are similarly regulated under equivalent local laws and regulations, which could change at any time. New and more stringent governmental regulations may be adopted in the future that, if enacted, may have an adverse impact on us. If any of our material licenses, certificates, authorizations, or approvals were revoked or suspended by the FAA or equivalent regulatory agencies in other countries, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Environmental regulation and legal proceedings could lead to significant costs and liability.

We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including environmental and health and safety regulations. Compliance with these regulations is challenging and requires constant attention and focus. We are subject to federal, state, and foreign environmental laws and regulations concerning, among other things, water discharges, air emissions, hazardous material and waste management, and environmental cleanup. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and we may become subject to increasingly stringent environmental standards in the future, particularly under air quality and water quality laws and standards related to climate change issues, such as reporting greenhouse gas emissions. Our failure to comply with these regulations could subject us to fines and other penalties administered by the agencies responsible for environmental and safety compliance.

If we fail to comply with government procurement laws and regulations, we could lose business and be liable for various penalties or sanctions.

Some of our services are sold under government contracts or subcontracts including contracts with U.S. government agencies, foreign governmental agencies or entities and other governmental agencies or entities including at the state or local level. These business relationships are dependent on a range of procurement and compliance requirements including frequent requirements with respect to a competitive bid process. Government contracts generally are subject to a variety of other regulations and restrictions including that these arrangements are frequently terminable at any time for the convenience of the government. From time to time, we are also subject to government inquiries and investigations of our business practices due to our participation in government programs. Violation of applicable government rules and regulations could result in civil liability, the cancellation or suspension of existing contracts, or the ineligibility for future contracts or subcontracts funded in whole or in part with federal funds, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Product liability and product warranty risks could adversely affect our operating results.

We manufacture, repair, and overhaul complex aircraft and critical parts for aircraft. Failure of our aircraft or parts could give rise to substantial product liability and other damage claims. We maintain insurance to address this risk, but our insurance coverage may not be adequate for some claims and there is no guarantee that insurance will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Additionally, aircraft and parts we manufacture for sale are subject to strict contractually established specifications using complex manufacturing processes. If we fail to meet the contractual requirements for a part, we may be subject to warranty costs to repair or replace the part itself and additional costs related to the investigation and inspection of non-complying parts. These costs are generally not insured.

Fuel shortages or fluctuations in the price of fuel could adversely affect our operations.

Our aerial operations depend on the use of jet fuel. Fuel costs have historically been subject to wide price fluctuations, and fuel availability is subject to shortage and is affected by demand for heating oil, gasoline, and other petroleum products. Fuel shortages and increases in the price of fuel, or decreases in the price of fuel when we have entered into hedging agreements, could adversely affect our operations.


42
Table of Contents

We rely on information technology, and if we are unable to protect against service interruptions, data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches, our operations could be disrupted and our business could be negatively affected.

We rely on information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic and financial information; to coordinate our business across our global operation bases; and to communicate within our company and with customers, suppliers, partners and other third-parties. These information technology systems may be susceptible to damage, disruptions or shutdowns, hardware or software failures, power outages, computer viruses, cyber attacks, telecommunication failures, user errors or catastrophic events. If our information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our operations could be disrupted and our business could be negatively affected. In addition, cyber attacks could lead to potential unauthorized access and disclosure of confidential information, and data loss and corruption.

Our business in countries with a history of corruption and transactions with foreign governments increases the compliance risks associated with our international activities.

Our international operations could expose us to trade and economic sanctions or other restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments or organizations. The U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies and authorities have a broad range of civil and criminal penalties at their disposal to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of trading sanctions laws, the FCPA, and other federal statutes. Under trading sanctions laws, the government may seek to impose modifications to business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and could subject us to fines, penalties and other sanctions.

Our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely affect us.

Our pilots and maintenance and manufacturing personnel are highly trained and qualified. Our ability to attract and retain qualified pilots, mechanics, and other highly trained personnel will be an important factor in determining our future success. Our aircraft, and the aerial services we provide, require pilots with high levels of flight experience. The market for these experienced and highly trained personnel is extremely competitive. Some of our pilots and mechanics are members of the U.S. military reserves and could be called to active duty. If significant numbers of such persons were called to active duty, it would reduce the supply of such workers, possibly curtailing our operations and likely increasing our labor costs. Because of our small size relative to many of our competitors, we may be unable to attract qualified personnel as easily as our competitors.

We have experienced significant turnover in personnel in recent time periods, which we believe is attributable in part to our ongoing financial difficulties and the overall performance of our business including our current cost reduction initiatives and liquidity constraints. In addition, due to the declines in the price of our common stock, the exercise price of most of our outstanding employee stock options substantially exceeds the trading price of our common stock which substantially reduces the compensation benefit of these equity incentives. These factors may affect our ability to attract and retain critical employees, which could seriously harm our ability to generate revenue, manage day-to-day operations, and deliver our products and services.

We have a significant stockholder whose interests may not coincide with other stockholders.

Entities affiliated with ZM Equity Partners, LLC owns a majority of our outstanding common stock, and one of our directors is a managing director of Centre Lane Partners, LLC, an affiliate of ZM Equity Partners, LLC. These stockholders could exert significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, this concentration of our stock ownership could delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. The interests of these significant stockholders may not always coincide with our interests as a company or the interests of other stockholders. These factors may have an impact on any strategic alternatives that we may wish to consider including any refinancing, restructuring or other transactions depending on the required approvals and the willingness of our largest stockholders to support certain transactions or initiatives.

Item 5.    Other Information.

In August 2016, we initiated a restructuring plan designed to right-size the Company’s staffing to meet current revenue levels. We are implementing a reduction-in-force of a combination of employees and contractors totaling approximately 135, which is expected to be completed by September 30, 2016. The terminated employees will be granted termination benefits, which will be expensed and paid in the third quarter on the date of employee communication. The total cost of these termination benefits is expected to range between $0.5 million and $1.0 million.

43
Table of Contents


Item 6.    Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number
  
Description
 
 
10.1
 
Amendment Number Ten to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2016).
10.2
 
Amendment Number Eleven to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 29, 2016).
10.3
 
Amendment Number Twelve to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2016).
10.4
  
Amendment Number Thirteen to Credit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 28, 2016).

10.5
 
Amendment Fee Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 28, 2016).

10.6
 
Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release Among Plaintiff and Defendants, effective June 13, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 17, 2016).
10.7
 
Offer Letter between Erickson Incorporated and Mr. Lancelot effective June 6, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2016).
31.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
  
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
 
 
 
 



44
Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
Erickson Incorporated
 
 
 
Date:
August 12, 2016
By:
/s/ DAVID LANCELOT
 
 
 
David Lancelot
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(signing on behalf of the registrant as principal financial officer)

45