Edgar Filing: SMTC CORP

smtc_10q-093012.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-31051

SMTC CORPORATION

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)


DELAWARE	98-0197680
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)	(I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)

635 HOOD ROAD

MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CANADA L3R 4N6

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)

(905) 479-1810

(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See: definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-accelerated Filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of October 1, 2012, SMTC Corporation had 16,333,906 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and one share of special voting stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

SMTC CORPORATION

Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

Item 1	Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	22

Item 4T	Controls and Procedures	23

PART II OTHER INFORMATION		23

Item 1A	Risk factors	23

Item 6	Exhibits	24

Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of:

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2012			January 1, 2012
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	955		$	2,635
Accounts receivable—net (note 3)		42,015			37,904
Inventories (note 3)		56,304			52,648
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3,100			1,638
Income taxes recoverable		158			—
Current portion of deferred income taxes		278			278
		102,810			95,103
Property, plant and equipment—net (note 3)		17,947			15,355
Deferred financing costs—net (note 3)		613			916
Deferred income taxes (note 6)		2,968			2,922
	$	124,338		$	114,296
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	42,501		$	46,352
Accrued liabilities (note 3)		7,016			10,164
Income taxes payable		—			367
Current portion of long-term debt (note 4)		3,473			4,014
Current portion of capital lease obligations		1,712			1,449
		54,702			62,346
Long-term debt (note 4)		26,397			15,233
Capital lease obligations		1,640			2,150
Commitments and Contingencies (note 10)


Shareholders’ equity:
Capital stock (note 5)		389			5,631
Additional paid-in capital		263,302			257,583
Deficit		(222,092	)		(228,647	)
		41,599			34,567
	$	124,338		$	114,296

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012			October 2, 2011			September 30, 2012			October 2, 2011
Revenue	$	75,575		$	44,082		$	223,149		$	149,243
Cost of sales (note 11)		69,567			40,361			202,335			135,758
Gross profit		6,008			3,721			20,814			13,485
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4,238			3,693			12,599			10,611
Contingent consideration (note 12)		—			—			(650	)		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt (note 13)		—			300			—			300
Restructuring charges (note 9)		—			686			451			2,793
Operating earnings (loss)		1,770			(958	)		8,414			(219	)
Interest expense (note 3)		526			326			1,531			981
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		1,244			(1,284	)		6,883			(1,200	)
Income tax (recoverable) expense (note 6)
Current		(45	)		99			374			462
Deferred		(33	)		73			(46	)		43
		(78	)		172			328			505
Net earnings (loss), also being comprehensive income (loss)		1,322			(1,456	)		6,555			(1,705	)

Earnings (loss) per share of common stock:

Basic	$	0.08		$	(0.09	)	$	0.40		$	(0.11	)
Diluted	$	0.08		$	(0.09	)	$	0.40		$	(0.11	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (note 7):
Basic		16,319,225			16,200,575			16,283,803			16,113,866
Diluted		16,444,053			16,200,575			16,419,272			16,113,866

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011

(Unaudited)

	Capital stock			Additional paid-in capital		Deficit			Total Shareholders’ equity
Balance, January 1, 2012	$	5,631		$	257,583	$	(228,647	)	$	34,567
Stock-based compensation		—			257		—			257
Conversion of shares from exchangeable to common stock		(5,243	)		5,243		—			—
Exercise of stock options		1			219		—			220
Net earnings		—			—		6,555			6,555
Balance, September 30, 2012	$	389		$	263,302	$	(222,092	)	$	41,599

	Capital stock			Additional paid-in capital		Deficit			Total Shareholders’ equity
Balance, January 2, 2011	$	5,903		$	256,723	$	(229,797	)	$	32,829
Stock-based compensation		—			117		—			117
Conversion of shares from exchangeable to common stock		(110	)		110		—			—
Exercise of stock options		3			314		—			317
Net loss		—			—		(1,705	)		(1,705	)
Balance, October 2, 2011	$	5,796		$	257,264	$	(231,502	)	$	31,558

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012			October 2, 2011			September 30, 2012			October 2, 2011
Cash provided by (used in):
Operations:
Net earnings (loss)	$	1,322		$	(1,456	)	$	6,555		$	(1,705	)
Items not involving cash:
Depreciation		786			704			2,310			2,059
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative financial instrument (note 11)		(1,119	)		125			(1,126	)		125
Loss on extinguishment of debt (note 13)		—			300			—			300
Deferred income taxes		(33	)		73			(46	)		43
Non-cash interest		98			57			303			166
Stock-based compensation		55			27			257			96
Contingent consideration		—			—			(650	)		—
Gain on acquisition of business		—			(22	)		—			(22	)
Change in non-cash operating working capital:
Accounts receivable		(2,169	)		3,867			(4,111	)		9,734
Inventories		4,396			(10,906	)		(3,656	)		(3,092	)
Prepaid expenses		867			(124	)		(507	)		826
Income taxes recoverable/payable		(266	)		3			(525	)		(42	)
Accounts payable		(5,528	)		5,614			(3,851	)		(10,124	)
Accrued liabilities		(925	)		1,353			(1,585	)		(1,827	)
		(2,516	)		(385	)		(6,632	)		(3,463	)
Financing:
Increase in revolving debt		2,150			6,712			12,784			10,713
Repayment of long-term debt		—			(1,235	)		(2,161	)		(1,235	)
Principal payment of capital lease obligations		(391	)		(342	)		(1,295	)		(1,174	)
Payment of contingent consideration (note 12)		(171	)		—			(742	)		—
Proceeds from sales leaseback		—			—			170			—
Deferred financing costs		—			(1,021	)		—			(1,021	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		27			19			220			317
		1,615			4,133			8,976			7,600
Investing:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(513	)		(125	)		(4,024	)		(434	)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired (note 12)		—			(3,033	)		—			(3,033	)
		(513	)		(3,158	)		(4,024	)		(3,467	)
Increase (decrease) in cash		(1,414	)		590			(1,680	)		670
Cash, beginning of period		2,369			1,013			2,635			933
Cash, end of the period	$	955		$	1,603		$	955		$	1,603

Supplemental Information
Cash interest paid	$	442		$	267		$	1,218		$	826
Cash taxes paid – net	$	205		$	102		$	833		$	551
Property, plant and equipment acquired through capital lease	$	—		$	667		$	1,048		$	2,133

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Nature of the business

SMTC Corporation (the “Company”) is a worldwide provider of advanced electronics manufacturing services to original equipment manufacturers. The Company services its customers through manufacturing and technology centers located in the United States, Canada, Mexico and China. All facilities provide a full suite of integrated manufacturing services including assembly, testing, box build, final product integration, and expanded supply chain capabilities. In addition, the Company operates an international sourcing and procurement office.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles and methods of application disclosed in the audited consolidated financial statements within the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended January 1, 2012, (“Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 8, 2012, except as described in Note 2. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the period ended January 1, 2012. Certain comparative figures have been restated to conform with the current year’s presentation.

2. Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No.2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement” (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). The amendments in this ASU change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend for the amendments in this ASU to result in a change in the application of the requirements in Topic 820. Some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income” (Topic 220) — Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05), to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12), which defers the effective date of ASU 2011-05 only with respect to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 as amended by ASU 2011-12 was effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2012 and has been applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 as amended by ASU 2011-12 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Balance Sheet” (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-12).The amendments in this update require an entity that has financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either 1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or 2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements. The amendments in this ASU will be required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Required disclosures should be presented retrospectively for all comparative periods. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2011-11 on our consolidated financial statements.

3. Consolidated financial statement details

The following consolidated financial statement details are presented as of the period ended for the consolidated balance sheets and for the periods ended for each of the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

Consolidated balance sheets

Accounts receivable – net:

	September 30, 2012			January 1, 2012
Accounts receivable	$	42,203		$	37,959
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(188	)		(55	)
Accounts receivable—net	$	42,015		$	37,904

Inventories:

	September 30, 2012		January 1, 2012
Raw materials	$	34,287	$	37,438
Work in process		14,977		9,716
Finished goods		5,611		4,047
Parts		1,429		1,447
Inventories	$	56,304	$	52,648

Property, plant and equipment – net:

	September 30, 2012			January 1, 2012
Cost:
Land	$	1,648		$	1,648
Buildings		9,878			9,878
Machinery and equipment (a)		39,254			35,743
Office furniture and equipment		2,728			2,417
Computer hardware and software (b)		10,066			9,365
Leasehold improvements (c)		3,654			3,275
	$	67,228		$	62,326
Less accumulated depreciation:
Land		—			—
Buildings		(6,177	)		(5,795	)
Machinery and equipment (a)		(28,395	)		(26,833	)
Office furniture and equipment		(2,383	)		(2,350	)
Computer hardware and software (b)		(9,254	)		(9,001	)
Leasehold improvements (c)		(3,072	)		(2,992	)
		(49,281	)		(46,971	)
Property, plant and equipment—net	$	17,947		$	15,355

(a)

Included within machinery and equipment were assets under capital leases with costs of $5,114 and $5,569 as at September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively and associated accumulated depreciation of $884 and $1,088 as of September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The related depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011 were $150 and $128, respectively. Related depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011 was $443 and $483, respectively. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, the Company assumed ownership of machinery and equipment formerly under capital lease with cost of $1,004 and accumulated depreciation of $660, upon conclusion of the capital lease terms. Nominal consideration was paid for these assets. These assets were reclassified to owned machinery and equipment on a prospective basis.

(b)

Included within computer hardware and software were assets under capital leases with costs of $400 and associated accumulated depreciation of $89 as at September 30, 2012. There were no computer hardware and software under capital leases as at January 1, 2012. The related depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011 was $33 and $nil, respectively. Related depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011 was $89 and $43, respectively.

(c)

Included within leasehold improvements were assets under capital leases with costs of $73 and associated accumulated depreciation of $5 as at September 30, 2012. There were no leasehold improvements under capital leases as at January 1, 2012. The related depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $2 and $5, respectively.

Deferred financing costs:

	September 30, 2012			January 1, 2012
Deferred financing costs	$	1,356		$	1,356
Accumulated amortization		(743	)		(440	)
	$	613		$	916

Accrued liabilities:

	September 30, 2012		January 1, 2012
Customer related	$	910	$	1,892
Payroll		3,031		3,169
Professional services		497		485
Vendor related		393		722
Interest and financing related		139		127
Restructuring (note 9)		413		915
Acquisition related		1,008		2,400
Other		625		454
Accrued liabilities	$	7,016	$	10,164

Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income

Interest expense:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011		September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011
Long-term debt	$	455	$	280	$	1,343	$	845
Obligations under capital leases		71		46		188		136
Interest expense	$	526	$	326	$	1,531	$	981

4. Long-term debt

	September 30, 2012			January 1, 2012
Revolving	$	25,238		$	12,454
Term		4,632			6,793
		29,870			19,247
Less: Current portion of long-term debt		(3,473	)		(4,014	)
Long-term debt	$	26,397		$	15,233

The maximum amount of funds available under the PNC Facility is $45 million. Availability under the revolving credit facility is subject to certain borrowing base conditions based on the eligible inventory and accounts receivable. Advances made under the revolving credit facility will bear interest at the base commercial lending rate of PNC in the respective country, which should approximate prime rate. The EDC Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% to 3.5% depending on the achievement of financial performance levels as specified in the amended debt agreement.

The Company incurred costs of $997 in 2011 (2012 – nil) related to the PNC Facility and the amended EDC Facility. These costs were recorded as a non-current deferred charge and are being amortized over the terms of the respective debt agreements.

Remaining principal repayments of the term loan from EDC consist of four quarterly installments of $1,158, the last of which is due October 1, 2013.

The PNC Facility and EDC Facility are jointly and severally guaranteed by the Company and secured by the assets and capital stock of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and its future subsidiaries.

The Company is required to use a “lock-box” arrangement, whereby remittances from customers are swept daily to reduce the borrowings under the revolving credit facilities, for which events of default are objectively determined.

At September 30, 2012, included in the revolving debt balance was a Canadian dollar denominated debt balance of $2,783. At January 1, 2012, there was a Canadian dollar denominated debt balance of $1,312.

The Company is in compliance with the financial covenants included in the PNC Facility and the EDC Facility as at September 30, 2012 and management believes that the Company will be in compliance with these covenants for at least the next twelve months. Continued compliance with its covenants, however, is dependent on the Company achieving certain forecasts. Market conditions have been difficult to predict and there is no assurance that the Company will achieve its forecasts. In the event of non-compliance, the Company’s lenders have the right to demand repayment of the amounts outstanding under the lending agreements or pursue other remedies or, if the Company can reach an agreement with its lenders, to amend or waive the financial covenants.

5. Capital stock

Common shares

Authorized share capital:

The authorized share capital of the Company at September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012 consisted of:

(i)

26,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share: Holders are entitled to one vote per share and the right to share in dividends pro rata subject to any preferential dividend rights of any then outstanding preferred stock.

(ii)

5,000,000 shares of special voting stock, par value $0.01 per share: From time to time the Company may issue special voting stock in one or more series and will fix the terms of that series at the time it is created.

Issued and outstanding:

The issued and outstanding number of common shares included in shareholders’ equity consisted of the following as of September 30, 2012:

	Number of shares			$
Common Stock
Exchangeable shares:
Balance at beginning of the nine month period		554,748		$	5,249
Shares retired pursuant to:
Conversion to common stock		(554,748	)		(5,249	)
Balance at end of the period		—		$	—
Common shares:
Balance at beginning of the nine month period		15,651,026		$	382
Shares issued pursuant to:
Exercise of stock options		128,132			1
Conversion of exchangeable shares		554,748			6
Balance at end of the period		16,333,906		$	389
Special voting stock:
Balance at beginning of the nine month period		1		$	—
Balance at end of the period		1		$	—
Total Common stock		16,333,907		$	389

Exchangeable shares:

Exchangeable shares of SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada (“SMTC Canada”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, could be exchanged on a one-for-one basis for one share of the common stock of the Company. Each exchangeable share of SMTC Canada, as nearly as practicable, was intended to be the economic equivalent of a share of common stock of the Company and holders of the exchangeable shares of SMTC Canada were able to exercise essentially the same voting rights with respect to the Company as they would have if they had exchanged their exchangeable shares of SMTC Canada for common stock of the Company. Upon the earlier of July 27, 2015, or the number of outstanding exchangeable shares falling below 500,000, subject to certain adjustment and acceleration provisions, SMTC Canada had the right to exchange all of the outstanding exchangeable shares by delivering common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis. During the three month period ended April 1, 2012, the number of outstanding exchangeable shares fell below 500,000. On May 25, 2012, SMTC Canada exercised its aforementioned rights, and converted all outstanding exchangeable shares to common shares of SMTC.

Stock options

For information regarding the Company’s stock option arrangements, see Note 6 of Form 10-K. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, 350,000 options were granted to employees. The Company generally issues new shares when options are exercised. A summary of stock option activity for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 is as follows:

	Number of options			Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value		Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)
Outstanding at January 1, 2012		1,202,826		$	2.82
Options granted		350,000		$	3.11
Options exercised		(128,132	)	$	1.35
Options forfeited or cancelled		(13,600	)	$	22.83
Outstanding at September 30, 2012		1,411,094		$	2.80	$	509		4.0
Exercisable at September 30, 2012		220,262		$	2.15	$	25		2.8

The estimated fair value of options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is amortized over the vesting period on a straight line basis. The Company has elected to use the simplified method for estimating the expected life which is equal to the midpoint between the vesting period and the contractual term. The simplified method is used as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data and the terms of share option grants have changed. The computation of expected volatility is based on the Company’s historical volatility from its traded common stock over the expected term of the option grants. The interest rate for periods within the expected term of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The following weighted average assumptions were used in calculating the estimated fair value of options used to compute stock-based compensation expenses:

	Period ended September 30, 2012
Black-Scholes weighted-average assumptions
Expected dividend yield		0.0	%
Expected volatility		83.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.5	%
Expected option life in years		4.0

Weighted-average stock option fair value per option granted	$	1.86

During the three month periods ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense and a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital of $55 and $27, respectively. During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense and a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital of $257 and $117, respectively. At September 30, 2012, compensation expense of $1,240 related to non-vested stock options had not been recognized.

Deferred share units

In previous periods, Deferred Share Units were granted to directors and the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company as remuneration. No deferred share units were granted in the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 or October 2, 2011. There were no deferred share units outstanding at either January 1, 2012 or September 30, 2012. Cash payments of $128 were made for 46,688 deferred share units during the nine months ended October 2, 2011. There were no cash payments made during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 or the three months ended October 2, 2011.

Deferred Share Unit compensation recovery for the nine months ended October 2, 2011 was $21 reflecting mark-to-market adjustments. There will be no further Deferred Share Unit compensation recoveries or expenses subsequent to the first quarter of 2011 since there are no deferred share units outstanding.

6. Income taxes

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded a net income tax recoverable of $78 related to a recovery of $360 due to a revision of prior period estimates for US alternative minimum taxes offset by taxes on profits and foreign exchange in certain jurisdictions of $282. During the three months ended October 2, 2011, the Company recorded a net income tax expense of $172, primarily related to minimum taxes and taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions, combined with foreign exchange revaluation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded a recovery of $210 due to a revision of prior year estimates for US alternative minimum tax offset by taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions of $538. During the nine months ended October 1, 2011 the Company recorded a net income tax expense of $505 primarily related to minimum taxes and taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions, combined with foreign exchange revaluation.

At January 1, 2012, the Company had total net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards of $107,833, which will expire in the years presented below:

2012	$	1,260
2014		10,278
2015		4,154
2018		1,078
2019		60
2020		30
2021		11,365
2022		16,207
2023		27,270
2025-2031		36,131
	$	107,833

At September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $279 and $274, respectively, which if recognized, would favorably impact the Company’s effective tax rate in future periods. The change during the period relates to foreign exchange revaluation of existing uncertain tax positions. The Company does not expect any of these unrecognized tax benefits to reverse in the next twelve months.

Tax years 2008 to 2011 remain open for review by the tax authorities in Canada. Tax years 2004 and 2008 to 2011 remain open in the United States.

The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense based on the likelihood of the event and its ability to reasonably estimate such amounts. The Company has approximately $61 and $48 accrued for interest and penalties as of September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The change is primarily due to the recording of incremental interest on existing uncertain positions for the period and foreign exchange revaluation.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, change of control limitations, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Guidance under ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. At the end of the second quarter of 2003, the Company concluded that given the weakness and uncertainty in the economic environment at that time, it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets. Commencing in 2004, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets associated with the Mexican jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets since 2004. In 2010, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets associated with the U.S. jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets. The Canadian jurisdiction continues to have a full valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets.

7. Earnings per common share

The following table details the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the purposes of computing basic and diluted earnings per common share for the following periods:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
(Number of common shares)	September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011		September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		16,319,255		16,200,575		16,283,803		16,113,866
Dilutive stock options (a) (b)		124,798		—		135,469		—
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		16,444,053		16,200,575		16,419,272		16,113,866

(a)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as a result of net earnings from continuing operations, dilutive options were determined using the treasury stock method, using an average share price of $3.08 and $3.24 per share, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the calculation did not include 590,600 and 408,267 stock options, respectively, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

(b)	As a result of the net loss from continuing operations for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, diluted earnings per share was calculated using the basic weighted average shares outstanding as the effect of potential common shares would have been anti-dilutive.

8. Segmented information

General description

The Company derives its revenue from one dominant industry segment, the electronics manufacturing services industry. The Company is operated and managed geographically and has facilities in the United States, Canada, Mexico and China. The Company monitors the performance of its geographic operating segments based on adjusted EBITDA (earnings before restructuring charges, loss on extinguishment of debt, acquisition costs, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Intersegment adjustments reflect intersegment sales that are generally recorded at prices that approximate arm’s-length transactions. In assessing the performance of the operating segments management attributes revenue to the operating segment which ships the product to the customer. Information about the operating segments is as follows:

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012			October 2, 2011			September 30, 2012			October 2, 2011
Revenues from continuing operations
Mexico	$	59,546		$	27,111		$	169,613		$	89,003
China		10,680			9,135			37,921			28,091
Canada		10,322			6,103			29,377			27,013
U.S.		16,078			4,843			41,690			11,679
Total	$	96,626		$	47,192		$	278,601		$	155,786
Intersegment revenue
Mexico	$	(235	)	$	(1,530	)	$	(2,483	)	$	(2,174	)
China		(380	)		—			(2,295	)		(189	)
Canada		(2,211	)		(1,507	)		(5,014	)		(4,053	)
U.S.		(7,964	)		(73	)		(10,101	)		(90	)
Total	$	(10,789	)	$	(3,110	)	$	(19,892	)	$	(6,506	)
Net external revenue from continuing operations
Mexico	$	49,049		$	25,581		$	131,570		$	86,829
China		10,300			9,135			35,626			27,865
Canada		8,111			4,596			24,363			22,960
U.S.		8,114			4,770			31,589			11,589
Total	$	75,575		$	44,082		$	223,149		$	149,243
Adjusted EBITDA
Mexico	$	3,214		$	1,959		$	10,154		$	7,214
China		101			662			1,522			1,001
Canada		(1,560	)		(1,534	)		(3,222	)		(2,646	)
U.S.		801			(355	)		2,721			(636	)
Total	$	2,556		$	732		$	11,175		$	4,933
Interest		526			326			1,531			981
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			300			—			300
Restructuring charges		—			686			451			2,793
Depreciation		786			704			2,310			2,059
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	$	1,244		$	(1,284	)	$	6,883		$	(1,200	)

Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment

The following table contains additions, including those acquired through capital leases, to property, plant and equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011		September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011
Mexico	$	187	$	703	$	1,891	$	1,250
China		143		6		1,819		6
Canada		43		63		634		1,171
U.S.		140		20		558		140
Total	$	513	$	792	$	4,902	$	2,567

Long-lived assets (a)

	September 30, 2012		January 1, 2012
Mexico	$	10,498	$	10,170
China		2,358		631
Canada		2,884		2,686
U.S.		2,207		1,868

Total	$	17,947	$	15,355

(a)

Long-lived assets information is based on the principal location of the asset. During the three months ended July 1, 2102 $1,500 of long-lived assets were purchased from Alco Electronics Ltd. in China.

Geographic revenues

The following table contains geographic revenues based on the product shipment destination, for the three and nine months ended September 30 1, 2012 and October 2, 2011:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011		September 30, 2012		October 2, 2011
U.S.	$	53,341	$	26,419	$	158,542	$	89,117
Canada		20,539		14,111		53,546		46,075
Europe		1,576		3,206		10,560		10,593
Asia		115		341		449		3,430
Mexico		4		5		52		28
Total	$	75,575	$	44,082	$	223,149	$	149,243

Significant customers and concentration of credit risk:

Sales of the Company’s products are concentrated in certain cases among specific customers in the same industry. The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk in trade receivables. The Company considers concentrations of credit risk in establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts and believes the recorded allowances are adequate.

The Company expects to continue to depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a significant percentage of its revenue. In addition to having a limited number of customers, the Company manufactures a limited number of products for each customer. If the Company loses any of its larger customers or any product line manufactured for one of its larger customers, it could experience a significant reduction in revenue. Also, the insolvency of one or more of its larger customers or the inability of one or more of its larger customers to pay for its orders could decrease revenue. As many costs and operating expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in net revenue can decrease profit margins and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations.

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, two customers individually comprised 36.6% and 11.1% (October 2, 2011– four customers individually comprised 22.5%, 11.6%, 11.0% and 10.4%) of total revenue across all geographic segments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 two customers individually comprised 34.3% and 13.4% (October 2, 2011 – four customers individually comprised 17.7%, 12.2%, 11.9% and 10.3%) of total revenue from continuing operations across all geographic segments. As of September 30, 2012, these customers represented 30.3%, and 10.7%, respectively, (January 1, 2012, 22% and 4%, respectively) of the Company’s accounts receivable.

9. Restructuring charges

During the first quarter of 2012 the Company executed its 2012 Plan to combine the operations of the San Jose and ZF Array Technologies (“ZF Array”) facilities into one facility. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $451, consisting of severance costs of $196 and facility exit costs of $255. Staff levels were reduced by approximately 16 full-time equivalents (“FTEs”).

The following table details the change in restructuring accrual for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, relating to the 2011 Plan:

	Severance
2011 Plan
Balance as at January 1, 2012	$	915
Payments		(409	)
Balance as at April 1, 2012		506
Payments		(186	)
Balance as at July 1, 2012		320
Payments		(162	)
Balance as at September 30, 2012	$	158

Remaining accrued amounts relating to the 2011 Plan consist of severance payments of $158 in Canada that are expected to be paid out by the end of fiscal 2012 through a drawdown on the revolving credit facilities.

The following table details the change in restructuring accrual for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, relating to the 2012 Plan:

	Severance			Facility exit costs		Total
2012 Plan
Balance as at January 1, 2012	$	—		$	—	$	—
Charges		196			255		451
Payments		(126	)		—		(126	)
Balance as at April 1, 2012	$	70		$	255	$	325
Payments		(70	)		—		(70	)

Balance as at July 1, 2012 and September 30, 2012	$	—		$	255	$	255

Remaining accrued amounts relating to the 2012 Plan in the United States are expected to be paid out by the end of fiscal 2012 through a drawdown on the revolving credit facilities.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to litigation and claims from customers, suppliers and former employees. Management believes that adequate provisions have been recorded in the financial statements, as required. Although it is not possible to estimate the extent of potential costs, if any, management believes that ultimate resolution of such contingencies would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

11. Derivative financial instruments

The Company has entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign exchange currency rate fluctuations related to forecasted Canadian dollar denominated payroll, rent and utility cash flows for the next five months, and Mexican peso denominated payroll, rent and utility cash flows for the next ten months. These contracts were effective as hedges from an economic perspective, but did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these contracts were recognized into net income in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. The Company does not enter into forward foreign exchange contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

The following table presents a summary of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts as at September 30, 2012:

Currency	Buy/Sell	Foreign Currency Amount	Notional Contract Value in USD

Canadian Dollar	Buy	CAD 12,500	$	12,045

Mexican Peso	Buy	MXN 171,282	$	12,900

The unrealized gain recognized in earnings as a result of revaluing the instruments to fair value on September 30, 2012 was $1,119 for the three month period ended September 30, 2012 and the unrealized gain for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 was $1,126, which were included in cost of sales in the statement of operations and comprehensive income. The realized loss on these contracts for the quarter was $79 and the realized gain for the nine month period was $357, and is included as a component of cost of sales, in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Fair value was determined using the market approach with valuation based on market observables (Level 2 quantitative inputs in the hierarchy set forth under ASC 820). During the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2011, unrealized loss on revaluation of derivative financial instruments was $125.

The following table presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments located on the consolidated balance sheet as at the following dates:

	September 30, 2012		January 1, 2012
Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	1,083	$	190
Accrued liabilities		—		(233	)
Net fair value of derivative financial instruments	$	1,083	$	(43	)

12. Acquisitions

Upon the acquisition of ZF Array on August 31, 2011, the Company paid $4 million in cash; less cash acquired of $967 and accrued $2.4 million for contingent consideration. Contingent consideration is based on financial performance of the acquired company’s operations for a 24-month period following the acquisition date, to a maximum of $2.4 million. Based on the results to date and anticipated future performance it is evident that the maximum amount will not be earned; fair value of the contingent consideration liability was reduced during the three months ended July 1, 2012 resulting in recognition of a gain of $650.

13. Loss on extinguishment of debt

Upon the repayment of the Company’s previous credit facility with Wells Fargo during the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash charge to write off the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs related to the extinguished revolving credit facility of $300.

Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Where we say “we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company” or “SMTC”, we mean SMTC Corporation or SMTC Corporation and its subsidiaries, as it may apply. Where we refer to the “industry”, we mean the electronics manufacturing services industry.

You should read this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in combination with the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) included within the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 8, 2012. The forward-looking statements in this discussion regarding the electronics manufacturing services industry, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements in this discussion include numerous risks and uncertainties, some of which are as described in the “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” section in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 8, 2012, as updated by Item 1A in Part II of this quarterly report. Certain statements in this MD&A contain words such as “could”, “expects”, “may”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, “envisions”, “seeks” and other similar language and are considered forward looking statements or information under applicable securities laws. These statements are based on our current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the operating environment, economies and markets in which we operate. These statements are subject to important assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict and the actual outcome may be materially different. Although we believe expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable based upon the assumptions in this MD&A, they may prove to be inaccurate and consequently our actual results could differ materially from our expectations set out in this MD&A. We may not update these forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q, even though our situation may change in the future. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

This MD&A contains discussion in U.S. dollars unless specifically stated otherwise.

Background

SMTC Corporation is a mid-tier provider of end-to-end electronics manufacturing services, or EMS, including product design and sustaining engineering services, printed circuit board assembly, or PCBA, production, enclosure fabrication, systems integration and comprehensive testing services. SMTC facilities span a broad footprint in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and China, with approximately 1,875 full-time employees. SMTC’s services extend over the entire electronic product life cycle from the development and introduction of new products through to growth, maturity and end-of-life phases. SMTC offers fully integrated contract manufacturing services with a distinctive approach to global original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and technology companies primarily within the industrial, computing and networking, communications, and medical market segments.

Developments in 2012

In the third quarter of 2012, revenue was $75.6 million compared to $44.1 million for the third quarter of 2011. Revenue has increased for the fourth consecutive quarter.

Year to date revenue increased $73.9 million, or 49.5%, from $149.2 million for the first nine months of 2011 to $223.1 million for the first nine months of 2012 mainly due to an increase in revenue for two of the Company’s long standing customers, combined with revenue generated from new customers. New customers have contributed $25.4 million in increased revenue, more than offsetting the loss of customers and existing programs.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded net income of $6.6 million compared to a net loss of $1.7 million for the comparative period in the prior year. This was mainly due to an increase in revenue levels and the resulting impact on the ability to cover fixed costs, improved selling, general and administration expenses and as a percentage of revenue, a reduction in restructuring costs, a gain on contingent consideration and realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains on forward foreign exchange contracts.

Results of Operations

The consolidated financial statements of SMTC are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Quarter ended September 30, 2012 compared with the quarter ended October 2, 2011:

The following table sets forth summarized operating results in millions of US$ for the periods indicated:

	Three months ended September 30, 2012					Three months ended October 2, 2011						Change 2012 to 2011
	$			%		$			$			$			%
Revenue	$	75.6		100.0	%	$	44.1			100.0	%	$	31.5			71.4	%
Cost of sales		69.6		92.1	%		40.4			91.6	%		29.2			72.3	%

Gross profit		6.0		7.9	%		3.7			8.4	%		2.3			62.2	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4.2		5.5	%		3.7			8.4	%		0.5			13.5	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—		—			0.3			0.7	%		(0.3	)		—
Restructuring charges		—		—			0.7			1.6	%		(0.7	)		—
Operating (loss) earnings		1.8		2.4	%		(1.0	)		(2.3	)%		2.8			280	%
Interest expense		0.5		0.7	%		0.3			0.7	%		0.2			66.7	%
Earnings before income taxes		1.3		1.7	%		(1.3	)		(2.9	)%		2.6			200	%
Income tax (recoverable) expense
Current		(0.1	)	(0.1	%)		0.1			0.2	%		(0.2	)		(200	)%
Deferred		—		—			0.1			0.2	%		(0.1	)		(100	)%
		(0.1	)	0.4	%		0.2			0.4	%		(0.3	)		(150	)%
Net earnings	$	1.4		1.9	%	$	(1.5	)		(3.4	)%	$	2.9			193	%

Revenue

Revenue increased $31.5 million, or 71.4%, from $44.1 million for the third quarter of 2011 to $75.6 million for the third quarter of 2012 mainly due to an increase in revenue for three of the Company’s long-standing customers, combined with revenue for a full quarter from the customers acquired in the ZF Array acquisition compared to one month in the third quarter of 2011 and revenue generated from new customers. New customers have contributed $4.3 million in increased revenue, more than offsetting attrition.

During the third quarter of 2012, revenue from the industrial sector increased to $59.1 million compared with $32.6 million for the same period in 2011, mainly due to the increase from the customers described above. Revenue from the industrial sector as a percentage of total revenue increased to 78.1% in the third quarter of 2012 compared with 73.9% in the third quarter of 2011.

Revenue from the communications sector increased in the third quarter of 2012 to $5.6 million compared to $2.5 million for the third quarter of 2011, which represented 7.4% of revenue in the third quarter of 2012, up from 5.7% of revenue in the third quarter of 2011. The increase was due to one new customer.

Revenue from the networking and enterprise computing sector increased to $7.4 million for the third quarter of 2012 compared with $6.6 million in 2011. The increase was due to one customer with increased demand. However, due to a larger increase in the industrial sector in the third quarter in 2012, as a percentage of total revenue this sector decreased to 9.9% of revenue compared to 15.0% in the third quarter in 2011.

Revenue for the medical sector increased by $1.1 million to $3.5 million in the third quarter of 2012, compared to $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2011 due to the increase in demand from one customer. However, revenue from the medical sector as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 4.6% in the third quarter of 2012 compared with 5.5% in the third quarter of 2011 due to the large increase in the industrial sector in the third quarter of 2012.

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company recorded approximately $1.9 million of sales of raw materials inventory to customers, which carried no margin, compared with $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2011. The Company purchases raw materials based on customer purchase orders. When a customer requires an order to be altered or changed, the customer is generally obligated to purchase the original on-order raw material at cost, to the extent the materials are not consumed within a specified period.

Due to changes in market conditions, the life cycle of products, the nature of specific programs and other factors, revenues from a particular customer typically varies from quarter to quarter and year to year. The Company’s ten largest customers represented 89.5% of revenue from continuing operations during the third quarter of 2012, compared with 83.1% in the third quarter of 2011. Revenue from the two largest customers during the third quarter of 2012 was $27.7 million and $8.4 million representing 36.6%, and 11.1% of total revenue for the third quarter of 2012, respectively. This compares with revenue from our four largest customers of $9.9 million, $5.1 million, $4.9 million, and $4.6 million representing 22.5%, 11.6%, 11.0%, and 10.4% of total revenue for the third quarter of 2011, respectively. No other customers represented more than 10% of revenue in either period.

During the third quarter of 2012, 65.0% of our revenue was attributable to production from our operations in Mexico, 13.6% in Asia, 10.7% in Canada and 10.7% in the U.S. During the third quarter of 2011, 58.0% of our revenue was attributable to production from our operations in Mexico, 20.7% in Asia, 10.4% in Canada and 10.8% in the U.S.

The Company operates in a highly competitive and dynamic marketplace in which current and prospective customers from time to time seek to lower their costs through a competitive bidding process among EMS providers. This process creates an opportunity to increase revenue to the extent we are successful in the bidding process, however, there is also the potential for revenue to decline to the extent we are unsuccessful in this process. Furthermore, even if we are successful, there is potential for our margins to decline. If we lose any of our larger product lines manufactured for any one of our customers, we could experience declines in revenue.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the third quarter of 2012 increased by $2.3 million to $6.0 million, However gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased from 8.4% of revenue in the third quarter of 2011 to 7.9% in the third quarter of 2012. The main reason for the decrease in gross margin percentage was due to the increase in the cost of materials, inefficiency in labor, and severance cost at the Markham facility, slightly offset by an unrealized foreign exchange gain.

The Company adjusts for estimated obsolete or excess inventory for the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated realizable value based upon customer forecasts, shrinkage, the aging and future demand of the inventory, past experience with specific customers and the ability to sell back inventory to customers or suppliers. If these estimates change, additional write-downs may be required.

Starting in the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign exchange currency rate fluctuations related to forecasted Canadian dollar and Mexican peso expenditures. These contracts were effective as hedges from an economic perspective, but did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these contracts were recognized into net income in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Included in cost of sales for the third quarter of 2012 was an unrealized gain recognized as a result of revaluing the instruments to fair value of $1.1 million, and a realized loss of $0.1 million. During the third quarter of 2011 an unrealized loss was recognized as a result of revaluing the instruments to fair value of $0.1 million. There was no realized gain or loss related to forward foreign exchange contracts recorded in the third quarter of 2011.

Selling, General & Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million during the third quarter of 2012 to $4.2 million, however, as a percentage of sales has decreased to 5.5% from 8.4% in the third quarter of 2011. The increase was mainly due to increased labor costs as headcount was increased to correspond with the increase in revenue, and the assumption of headcount from ZF Array.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

Restructuring Charges

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company continued its 2011 Restructuring Plan. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $0.7 million, consisting of severance costs of $0.2 million in the United States, $0.2 million in the Markham facilities, and $0.3 in the corporate office. There were no restructuring charges recorded in the third quarter of 2012.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased from $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2011 to $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2012, primarily resulting from an increased average debt level to support the increase in working capital required for the increased revenue level. Interest expense in the third quarter of both 2011 and 2010 included amortization of deferred financing fees of $0.1 million. The weighted average interest rates with respect to the debt were 3.3% and 4.6% for each of the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Income Tax Expense

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded a net income tax recoverable of $0.1 million related to a recovery of $0.4 million due to a revision of prior period estimates for US alternative minimum taxes offset by taxes on profits and foreign exchange in certain jurisdictions of $0.3 million. During the three months ended October 2, 2011, the Company recorded a net income tax expense of $0.2 million, primarily related to minimum taxes and taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions, combined with foreign exchange revaluation.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, change of control limitations, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Guidance under ASC 740, “Income Taxes” states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. At the end of the second quarter of 2003, the Company concluded that given the weakness and uncertainly in the economic environment at that time, it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets. Commencing in 2004, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets associated with the Mexican jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets since 2004. In 2010, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets associated with the U.S. jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets. The same determination was made by management in 2011. The Canadian jurisdiction continues to have a full valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets.

At September 30, 2012, the Company had total net operating loss carry forwards of $107,833, of which $1,260 will expire in 2012, $10,278 will expire in 2014, $4,154 will expire in 2015, $1,078 will expire in 2018, $60 will expire in 2019, $30 will expire in 2020, $11,365 will expire in 2021, $16,207 will expire in 2022, $27,270 will expire in 2023, and the remainder will expire between 2025 and 2031.

Nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with nine months ended October 2, 2011:

The following table sets forth summarized operating results in millions of US$ for the periods indicated:

	Nine months ended September 30, 2012						Nine months ended October 2, 2011						Change 2012 to 2011
	$			%			$			%			$			%
Revenue	$	223.1			100.0	%	$	149.2			100.0	%	$	73.9			49.5	%
Cost of sales		202.3			90.7	%		135.7			90.9	%		66.6			49.1	%
Gross profit		20.8			9.3	%		13.5			9.1	%		7.3			54.1	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		12.6			5.6	%		10.6			7.1	%		2.0			18.9	%
Contingent Consideration		(0.7	)		(0.3	)%		—			—			(0.7	)		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			—			0.3			0.2	%		(0.3	)		—
Restructuring charges		0.5			0.2	%		2.8			1.9	%		(2.3	)		—
Operating earnings		8.4			3.8	%		(0.2	)		0.1	%		8.6			430.0	%
Interest expense		1.5			0.7	%		1.0			0.7	%		0.5			50.0	%
Earnings before income taxes		6.9			3.1	%		(1.2	)		(0.8	)%		8.1			675.0	%
Income tax expense
Current		0.3			0.1	%		0.5			0.3	%		(0.2	)		(40.0	)%
Deferred		—			0.0	%		—			0.0	%		—			—
		0.3			0.1	%		0.5			0.3	%		(0.2	)		(40.0	)%
Net earnings	$	6.6			3.0	%	$	(1.7	)		(1.1	)%	$	8.3			488.2	%

Revenue

Revenue increased $73.9 million, or 49.5%, from $149.2 million for the first nine months of 2011 to $223.1 million for the first nine months of 2012 mainly due to an increase in revenue for two of the Company’s long standing customers, combined with revenue generated from new customers. New customers have contributed $25.4 million in increased revenue, more than more than offsetting the loss of customers and existing programs.

During the first nine months of 2012, revenue from the industrial sector increased to $177.7 million compared with $106.4 million for the same period in 2011, mainly due to the increase from two customers described above and revenue generated from new customers. Revenue from the industrial sector as a percentage of total revenue increased to 79.6% in the first nine months of 2012 compared with 71.3% in the first nine months of 2011.

Revenue from the communications sector increased to $17.2 million for the first three quarters of 2012 compared to $10.2 million in 2011, which represented 7.7% of revenue in the first nine months of 2012, compared with 6.8% of revenue in the first nine months of 2011. The increase was due to two new customers in 2012 slightly offset by a decrease in one existing customer.

Revenue from the networking and enterprise computing sector decreased to $17.6 million for the first three quarters of 2012 compared to $25.3 million in 2011, which represented 7.9% of revenue in the first nine months of 2012, down from 17.0% of revenue in the first nine months of 2011. The decrease was due to two customers with lower demand.

Revenue for the medical sector increased by $3.3 million to $10.6 million for the first nine months of 2012, compared to $7.3 million in the first nine months of 2011 due to the increase in demand from one customer. Revenue from the medical sector as a percentage of total revenue remained consistent year over year with a slight decrease in the first nine months of 2012 to 4.8% of revenue compared to 4.9% in 2011.

During the first nine months of 2012, the Company recorded approximately $4.2 million of sales of raw materials inventory to customers, which carried no margin, compared with $3.7 million in the first nine months of 2011. The Company purchases raw materials based on customer purchase orders. When a customer requires an order to be altered or changed, the customer is generally obligated to purchase the original on-order raw material at cost, to the extent the materials are not consumed within a specified period.

Due to changes in market conditions, the life cycle of products, the nature of specific programs and other factors, revenues from a particular customer typically varies from quarter to quarter and year to year. The Company’s ten largest customers represented 88.7% of revenue from continuing operations during the first nine months of 2012, compared with 81.8% in the first nine months of 2011. Revenue from our two largest customers during the first nine months of 2012 was $76.4 million, and $29.9 million, representing 34.3%, and 13.4% of total revenue for the first nine months of 2012, respectively. Revenue from our four largest customers during the first nine months of 2011 was $26.4 million, $18.3 million, $17.8 million and $15.4 million, representing 17.7%, 12.2%, 11.9 % and 10.3% of total revenue for the first nine months of 2011, respectively. No other customers represented more than 10% of revenue in either period.

During the first nine months of 2012, 59.0% of our revenue was attributable to production from our operations in Mexico, 16.0% in Asia, 14.1% in the US and 10.9% in Canada. During the first nine months of 2011, 58.2% of our revenue was attributable to production from our operations in Mexico, 18.7% in Asia, 15.4% in Canada and 7.8% in the U.S.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the first nine months of 2012 increased by $7.2 million to $20.8 million or 9.3% of revenue compared with 9.1% of revenue for the same period in 2011. The main reason for the increase in gross margin percentage was due an unrealized foreign exchange gain, slightly offset by the increase in the cost of materials and inefficiency in labor.

Starting in the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign exchange currency rate fluctuations related to forecasted Canadian dollar and Mexican peso expenditures. These contracts were effective as hedges from an economic perspective, but did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these contracts were recognized into net income in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Included in cost of sales for the first nine months of 2012 was an unrealized gain recognized as a result of revaluing the instruments to fair value of $1.1 million, and a realized gain of $0.4 million. During the first nine months of 2011 an unrealized loss was recognized as a result of revaluing the instruments to fair value of $0.1 million. There was no realized gain or loss related to forward foreign exchange contracts recorded in the first nine months of 2011.

Selling, General & Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $2.0 million during the first nine months of 2012 to $12.6 million, however, as a percentage of sales has decreased to 5.6% from 7.1% in the first nine months of 2011. The increase was mainly due to increased labor costs as headcount was increased to correspond with the increase in revenue, the assumption of headcount from ZF Array, and increased business trip expense to generate additional revenue.

Restructuring Charges

During the first nine months of 2012, the Company executed its 2012 Plan to combine the operations of the San Jose and ZF Array Technologies facilities into one facility. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $451, consisting of severance costs of $196 and facility exit costs of $255. Staff levels were reduced by approximated 16 full-time equivalents.

During the first nine months of 2011 the Company executed its 2011 Plan to streamline operations in response to reductions in revenues. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $2.8 million, consisting of severance costs of $0.2 million in the United States, $0.6 million in Mexico, and $2.0 million in Canada. The Company reduced staff levels by approximately 13 in the United States, 241 in Mexico and 150 in Canada.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

Upon the repayment of the Company’s previous credit facility with Wells Fargo during the first nine months of 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash charge to write off the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs related to the extinguished revolving credit facility of $0.3 million. There was no loss on extinguishment of debt in the first nine months of 2012.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased from $1.0 million in the first nine months of 2011 to $1.5 million for the first nine months of 2012, an increase of $0.5 million primarily resulting from increased average debt levels to support the increase in working capital required for the increased revenue level. Interest expense in the first nine months of 2012 included amortization of deferred financing fees of $0.3 million, compared to $0.2 million for the same period of 2011. The weighted average interest rates with respect to the debt were 3.3% and 3.7% for each of the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Income Tax Expense

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded a recovery of $0.2 million due to a revision of prior year estimates for US alternative minimum tax offset by taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions of $0.5 million During the nine months ended October 1, 2011 the Company recorded a net income tax expense of $0.5 million primarily related to minimum taxes and taxes on profits in certain jurisdictions, combined with foreign exchange revaluation.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, change of control limitations, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Guidance under ASC 740, “Income Taxes” states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. At the end of the second quarter of 2003, the Company concluded that given the weakness and uncertainly in the economic environment at that time, it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets. Commencing in 2004, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets associated with the Mexican jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets since 2004. In 2010, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets associated with the U.S. jurisdiction would be realized and no valuation allowance has been recorded against these deferred tax assets. The same determination was made by management in 2011. The Canadian jurisdiction continues to have a full valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets.

Liquidity

Net cash used in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $6.6 million driven by working capital changes, slightly offset by the net income generated by the Company. Net working capital increased by $14.6 million mainly due to increases in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Accounts receivable days sales outstanding were 51 and 54 days for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011, respectively. The decrease was largely due to quicker payment from a few customers. Inventory turnover, on an annualized basis increased to 5 times for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and is back in line with historical rates compared to 3 times for the nine months ended October 2, 2011.

For the first 9 months of 2011 the inventory turnover was much lower than desired due to the substantial increase in inventory at the end of the third quarter to ramp up for the large increase in orders for the fourth quarter. Accounts payable days outstanding were 57 days at the end of the first nine months of 2012 compared to 72 days for the same period in 2011, as in the third quarter of 2011, there was a large inventory increase that was received in the last month of the quarter, resulting in a higher payable balance and increase in days at the end of the quarter.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $9.0 million compared to $7.6 million for the nine months ended October 2, 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company increased net debt by $10.6 million to support the increase in working capital required for the increased revenue level, compared to an increase of $9.5 million for the comparative period in 2011 mainly due to funding the ZF Array acquisition. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company generated $0.2 million in proceeds from the issuance of stock from executive option exercises, repaid capital lease payments of $1.3 million, paid contingent consideration of $0.7 million and received proceeds for sales leaseback of $0.2 million. During the nine months ended October 3, 2011, the Company generated $0.3 million in proceeds from the issuance of stock from executive option exercises, and repaid capital lease payments of $1.2 million

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $4.0 million which entirely consisted of additions of property, plant and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended October 2, 2011 was $3.5 million, consisting of cash paid for the acquisition of ZF Array of $4.0 million, net of cash acquired of $1.0 million, and $0.4 million in additions of property, plant and equipment.

Capital Resources

We believe that cash generated from operations, available cash and amounts available under our PNC and EDC Facilities and additional financing sources such as leasing companies and other lenders will be adequate to meet our debt service requirements, capital expenditures and working capital needs at our current level of operations and organic growth in the future, although no assurance can be given in this regard, particularly with respect to amounts available from lenders. We believe that the Company will be in compliance with its covenants for the foreseeable future. In the event the Company falls out of compliance of its revolving credit facility or obtain alternative financing, the Company may be unable to access credit and its debt obligations could become accelerated.

We have agreed to a borrowing base formula under which the amount we are permitted to borrow under the PNC Facility is based on our accounts receivable and inventory. Further, there can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to enable us to service our indebtedness. Our future operating performance and ability to service indebtedness will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, certain of which are beyond our control.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company acquired machinery and equipment with a value of $1.0 million through capital leases.

We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents, as well as available our revolving credit facility and additional financing sources will be sufficient to fund our anticipated cash requirements for working capital, contractual commitments, and capital expenditures for the next 12 months.

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Our credit facilities bear interest at floating rates. The weighted average interest rate incurred on debt for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was 3.3%. At September 30, 2012, the interest rate on our U.S. revolving credit facility is 3.25% based on the U.S. prime rate and our U.S. term debt bore interest at 3.73% based on LIBOR. If base rates increased by 10%, our interest expense would have increased by approximately $0.1 million annually.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Most of our sales and component purchases are denominated in U.S. dollars. Our Canadian, Mexican and Asian payroll, Euro based component purchases and other various expenses are denominated in local currencies. As a result, starting in the third quarter of 2011 the Company entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign exchange currency rate fluctuations related to forecasted Canadian dollar and Mexican peso as every $0.01 change in the US dollar results in a change in expenses of approximately $0.3 million. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar and Mexican Peso results in an increase in costs to the organization and may lead to a reduction in reported earnings.

Item 4 Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have conducted an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and the Company’s Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls and Procedures

There was no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect these controls identified in connection with the most recent evaluation of these controls by the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.

Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A Risk Factors

Other than with respect to the risk factors below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 1, 2012. The two risk factors below were disclosed on the Form 10-K and have been revised to provide updated information as of September 30, 2012.

A majority of our revenue comes from a small number of customers; if we lose any of our larger customers, our revenue could decline significantly.

We operate in a highly competitive and dynamic marketplace in which current and prospective customers often seek to lower their costs through a competitive bidding process among EMS providers. This process creates an opportunity to increase revenue to the extent we are successful in the bidding process, however, there is also the potential for revenue decline to the extent we are unsuccessful in the process. Furthermore, even if we are successful, there is the potential for our margins to decrease.

Our two largest customers represented 34.3% and 13.4% of total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. For the first nine months of 2012, our top ten largest customers collectively represented 88.7% of our total revenue. We expect to continue to depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a significant percentage of our revenue. In addition to having a limited number of customers, we manufacture a limited number of products for each of our customers. If we lose any of our largest customers or any product line manufactured for one of our largest customers, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenue. Also, the insolvency of one or more of our largest customers or the inability of one or more of our largest customers to pay for its orders could decrease revenue. As many of our costs and operating expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in net revenue can decrease our profit margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and severely limit our ability to plan for or respond to changes in our business.

On September 22, 2011, the Company signed a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association and its Canadian branch (collectively, “PNC”). This revolving credit facility (the “PNC Facility”) replaced the previous revolving loan agreement with Wells Fargo Capital Finance Corporation (“Wells Fargo”) and has a term of three years. The Company continues to have a term debt facility with Export Development Canada (“EDC”, and the “EDC Facility”), and on September 22, 2011 signed an amendment to its agreement with EDC to accommodate the change in revolving credit lender, but is otherwise largely unchanged from the existing agreement. The revolving credit facility will bear interest at the base commercial lending rate of PNC in the respective country, which should approximate prime rate. The EDC Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% to 3.5% depending on the achievement of financial performance levels as specified in the amended debt agreement. The Company is in compliance with its financial covenants as at September 30, 2012. Management believes that the Company will be in compliance with these covenants for at least the next twelve months. Accordingly, the outstanding balances under the lending agreements continue to be classified as long-term. Continued compliance with its covenants, however, is dependent on the Company achieving certain forecasts. Market conditions have been difficult to predict and there is no assurance that the Company will achieve its forecasts.

Our debt under the PNC and EDC Facilities could have adverse consequences for our business, including:

•

We will be more vulnerable to adverse general economic conditions.

•

We will be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to repayment of debt, limiting the availability of cash for other purposes.

•

We may have difficulty obtaining financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other purposes.

•

We may have limited flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry.

•

We could be limited in our borrowing of additional funds and making strategic investments by restrictive covenants and the borrowing base formula in our credit arrangements.

•

We may fail to comply with covenants under which we borrowed our indebtedness, including various financial covenants under our PNC and EDC Facilities. These covenants, applicable to specific four quarter rolling periods, include (i) a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio, (ii) maximum capital expenditures and (iii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Our failure to comply with covenants could result in an event of default. If an event of default occurs and is not cured or waived, it could result in all amounts outstanding, together with accrued interest, becoming immediately due and payable. If we were unable to repay such amounts, our lenders could proceed against any collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. There can be no assurance that we will maintain compliance with the covenants under the PNC and EDC Facilities.

There can be no assurance that our leverage and such restrictions will not materially adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. In addition, our ability to pay principal and interest on our indebtedness to meet our financial and restrictive covenants and to satisfy our other debt obligations will depend upon our future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, certain of which are beyond our control, as well as the availability of revolving credit borrowings under the PNC and EDC Facilities or successor facilities.

Item 6 Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Alex Walker pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

31.2	Certification of Claude Germain pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

31.3	Certification of Alex Walker pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

32.1	Certification of Alex Walker, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

32.2	Certification of Claude Germain, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

32.3	Certification of Alex Walker, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

101.INS**	XBRL Instance

101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

** XBRL	information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SMTC Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.

	SMTC CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ Alex Walker
	Name:	Alex Walker
	Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer

	By	/s/ Claude Germain
	Name:	Claude Germain
	Title:	Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2012

EXHIBIT INDEX

31.1	Certification of Alex Walker pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

31.2	Certification of Claude Germain pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

31.3	Certification of Alex Walker pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

32.1	Certification of Alex Walker, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

32.2	Certification of Claude Germain, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

32.3	Certification of Alex Walker, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 9, 2012.

101.INS**	XBRL Instance

101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

** XBRL	information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.