Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-26906
ASTA FUNDING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-3388607 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(IRS Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
210 Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
|
|
07632 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number: (201) 567-5648
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 20, 2009, the registrant had approximately 14,271,824 common shares
outstanding.
ASTA FUNDING, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,722,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,623,000 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,247,000 |
|
|
|
3,047,000 |
|
Consumer receivables acquired for liquidation (at net realizable value) |
|
|
403,808,000 |
|
|
|
449,012,000 |
|
Due from third party collection agencies and attorneys |
|
|
3,513,000 |
|
|
|
5,070,000 |
|
Investment in venture |
|
|
384,000 |
|
|
|
555,000 |
|
Furniture and equipment, net |
|
|
691,000 |
|
|
|
762,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
22,085,000 |
|
|
|
15,567,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,230,000 |
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
437,680,000 |
|
|
$ |
481,136,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
183,856,000 |
|
|
$ |
213,485,000 |
|
Subordinated debt related party |
|
|
8,246,000 |
|
|
|
8,246,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,949,000 |
|
|
|
4,618,000 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
286,000 |
|
|
|
571,000 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2,012,000 |
|
|
|
6,315,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
198,349,000 |
|
|
|
233,235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 14,271,824 shares at December 31, 2008 and
14,276,158 at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
143,000 |
|
|
|
143,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
69,466,000 |
|
|
|
69,130,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
170,802,000 |
|
|
|
178,925,000 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(1,080,000 |
) |
|
|
(297,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
239,331,000 |
|
|
|
247,901,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
437,680,000 |
|
|
$ |
481,136,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
2
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended |
|
|
Three Months
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income, net |
|
$ |
18,416,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,135,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,448,000 |
|
|
|
34,275,000 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,027,000 |
|
|
|
5,805,000 |
|
Interest expense (fiscal year 2009 - Related party $128,000) |
|
|
3,170,000 |
|
|
|
5,941,000 |
|
Impairments |
|
|
21,415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,612,000 |
|
|
|
11,746,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before equity in earnings in venture and income taxes |
|
|
(13,164,000 |
) |
|
|
22,529,000 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) in venture |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
(77,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before income taxes |
|
|
(13,147,000 |
) |
|
|
22,452,000 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(5,310,000 |
) |
|
|
9,138,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
$ |
13,314,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share Basic |
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,271,824 |
|
|
|
13,918,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,271,824 |
|
|
|
14,803,482 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
14,276,158 |
|
|
$ |
143,000 |
|
|
$ |
69,130,000 |
|
|
$ |
178,925,000 |
|
|
|
(297,000 |
) |
|
$ |
247,901,000 |
|
Stock based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(4,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit arising from
vesting of restricted
stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286,000 |
) |
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss), net
of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(783,000 |
) |
|
|
(783,000 |
) |
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
14,271,824 |
|
|
$ |
143,000 |
|
|
$ |
69,466,000 |
|
|
$ |
170,802,000 |
|
|
|
(1,080,000 |
) |
|
$ |
239,331,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended |
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended |
|
|
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
|
12/31/07 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
|
13,314,000 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(783,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(8,620,000 |
) |
|
|
13,314,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
$ |
13,314,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
359,000 |
|
|
|
196,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6,518,000 |
) |
|
|
3,623,000 |
|
Impairments of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
21,415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(620,000 |
) |
Due from third party collection agencies and attorneys |
|
|
1,557,000 |
|
|
|
(317,000 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(4,303,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,713,000 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(1,462,000 |
) |
|
|
447,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
3,493,000 |
|
|
|
14,117,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(1,078,000 |
) |
|
|
(37,509,000 |
) |
Principal collected on receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
19,212,000 |
|
|
|
18,320,000 |
|
Principal collected on receivables accounts represented by account sales |
|
|
4,400,000 |
|
|
|
5,438,000 |
|
Foreign exchange effect on receivables acquired for liquidation |
|
|
1,249,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distribution received from venture |
|
|
171,000 |
|
|
|
677,000 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(19,000 |
) |
|
|
(62,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
23,935,000 |
|
|
|
(13,136,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit arising from vesting of restricted stock awards |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in restricted cash |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
1,539,000 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(571,000 |
) |
|
|
(557,000 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(29,677,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,039,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
used in financing activities |
|
|
(29,393,000 |
) |
|
|
(57,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(1,965,000 |
) |
|
|
924,000 |
|
Effect of foreign exchange on cash |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period |
|
|
3,623,000 |
|
|
|
4,525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
1,722,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,449,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
(fiscal year 2009 Related party $128,000 ) |
|
$ |
3,405,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,105,000 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
4,917,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,198,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Business and Basis of Presentation
Business
Asta Funding, Inc., together with its wholly owned significant operating subsidiaries
Palisades Collection LLC, Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC (Palisades XVI), VATIV Recovery
Solutions LLC (VATIV) and other subsidiaries, not all wholly owned, and not considered material
(the Company) is engaged in the business of purchasing, managing for its own account and
servicing distressed consumer receivables, including charged-off receivables, semi-performing
receivables and performing receivables. The primary charged-off receivables are accounts that have
been written-off by the originators and may have been previously serviced by collection agencies.
Semi-performing receivables are accounts where the debtor is currently making partial or irregular
monthly payments, but the accounts may have been written-off by the originators. Performing
receivables are accounts where the debtor is making regular monthly payments that may or may not
have been delinquent in the past. Distressed consumer receivables are the unpaid debts of
individuals to banks, finance companies and other credit providers. A large portion of the
Companys distressed consumer receivables are MasterCard(R), Visa(R), other credit card accounts,
telecommunication accounts and auto deficiency receivables, which were charged-off by the issuers
for non-payment. The Company acquires these portfolios at substantial discounts from their face
values. The discounts are based on the characteristics (issuer, account size, debtor location and
age of debt) of the underlying accounts of each portfolio.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008, the condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders equity as of and for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three month
periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, are unaudited. The September 30, 2008 financial
information included in this report has been extracted from our audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which
include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly our financial position at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, the results of operations for the three month periods
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and cash flows for the three month periods ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 have been made. The results of operations for the three month periods ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any other interim period
or the full fiscal year.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
and therefore do not include all information and note disclosures required under generally accepted
accounting principles. The Company suggests that these financial statements be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
110 (SAB 110). This staff accounting bulletin (SAB) expresses the views of the staff regarding
the use of a simplified method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in developing an
estimate of expected term of plain vanilla share options in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment . In particular,
the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a companys election to use the simplified
method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates
of expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external
information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or
other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to companies. Therefore,
the staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for
share option grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed information
about employee exercise behavior might not have been widely available by December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the
simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. This SAB does not have a material impact on the
Company.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to provide companies
with the option to recognize most financial assets and liabilities and certain other items at fair
value. Statement 159 will allow companies the opportunity to mitigate earnings volatility caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
should be reported in earnings. The fair value option election is applied on an instrument by
instrument basis (with some exceptions), is irrevocable, and is applied to an entire instrument.
The election may be made as of the date of initial adoption for existing eligible items. Subsequent
to initial adoption, the Company may elect the fair value option at initial
recognition of eligible items or on entering into an eligible firm commitment. The Company can only
elect the fair value option after initial recognition in limited circumstances.
6
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
SFAS No. 159 requires similar assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the
fair value option to be displayed on the face of the balance sheet either (a) together with
financial instruments measured using other measurement attributes with parenthetical disclosure of
the amount measured at fair value or (b) in separate line items. In addition, SFAS No. 159 requires
additional disclosures to allow financial statement users to compare similar assets and liabilities
measured differently either within the financial statements of the Company or between financial
statements of different companies.
SFAS No. 159 was required to be adopted by the Company on October 1, 2008. Early adoption was
permitted; however, the Company did not adopt SFAS No. 159 prior to the required adoption date of
October 1, 2008. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 159 concurrent with SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. The remeasurement to fair-value will be reported as a cumulative-effect
adjustment in the opening balance of retained earnings. Additionally, any changes in fair value due
to the concurrent adoption of SFAS No. 157 will be included in the cumulative-effect adjustment if
the fair value option is also elected for that item.
The Company opted to not apply the fair value option to any of its financial assets or
liabilities. If the Company elects to recognize items at fair value as a result of Statement 159,
this could result in increased earnings volatility.
In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. Effective October 1,
2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157. The Statement defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not impact the
Companys financial reporting or disclosure requirements.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
the current periods presentation.
Note 2: Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. The Companys investment in a venture, representing a 25% interest, is
accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
7
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3: Consumer Receivables Acquired for Liquidation
The Company accounts for its investments in consumer receivable portfolios, using either:
|
|
|
the interest method; or |
|
|
|
|
the cost recovery method. |
Accounts acquired for liquidation are stated at their net estimated realizable value and
consist primarily of defaulted consumer loans to individuals throughout the country and in Central
and South America.
The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables using the interest method under
the guidance of AICPA Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities
Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3). Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain
Acquired Loans. (Practice Bulletin 6) was amended by SOP 03-3. Under the guidance of SOP 03-3
(and the amended Practice Bulletin 6), static pools of accounts are established. These pools are
aggregated based on certain common risk criteria. Each static pool is recorded at cost and is
accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss
provision.
Once a static pool is established for a quarter, individual receivable accounts are not added
to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned to
the seller). SOP 03-3 (and the amended Practice Bulletin 6) requires that the excess of the
contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or
expense or on the balance sheet. SOP 03-3 initially freezes the internal rate of return, referred
to as IRR, estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased, as the basis for subsequent
impairment testing. Significant increases in actual or expected future cash flows may be recognized
prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over a portfolios remaining life. Any
increase to the IRR then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. Rather than lowering the
estimated IRR if the collection estimates are not received or projected to be received, the
carrying value of a pool would be impaired, or written down to maintain the then current IRR. Under
the interest method, income is recognized on the effective yield method based on the actual cash
collected during a period and future estimated cash flows and timing of such collections and the
portfolios cost. Revenue arising from collections in excess of anticipated amounts attributable to
timing differences is deferred until such time as a review results in a change in the expected cash
flows. The estimated future cash flows are reevaluated quarterly.
The Company uses the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of accounts
cannot be reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no income is recognized until the
cost of the portfolio has been fully recovered. A pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying
balance on the balance sheet) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash
collections are recognized as revenue when received.
8
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Companys extensive liquidating experience is in the field of distressed credit card
receivables, telecommunication receivables, consumer loan receivables, retail installment
contracts, consumer receivables, and auto deficiency receivables. The Company uses the interest
method for accounting for asset acquisitions within these classes of receivables when it believes
it can reasonably estimate the timing of the cash flows. In those situations where the Company
diversifies its acquisitions into other asset classes where the Company does not possess the same
expertise or history, or the Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of the cash flows, the
Company utilizes the cost recovery method of accounting for those portfolios of receivables. At
December 31, 2008, approximately $166.4 million of the consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation are accounted for using the interest method, while approximately $237.4 million are
accounted for using the cost recovery method.
After SOP 03-3 was adopted, the Company aggregates portfolios of receivables acquired sharing
specific common characteristics which were acquired within a given quarter. The Company currently
considers for aggregation portfolios of accounts, purchased within the same fiscal quarter, that
generally meet the following characteristics:
|
|
|
same issuer/originator; |
|
|
|
|
same underlying credit quality; |
|
|
|
|
similar geographic distribution of the accounts; |
|
|
|
|
similar age of the receivable; and |
|
|
|
|
same type of asset class (credit cards, telecommunication, etc.) |
The Company uses a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors to estimate collections and
the timing thereof. This analysis includes the following variables:
|
|
|
the number of collection agencies previously attempting to collect the receivables in the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
the average balance of the receivables, as higher balances might be more difficult to collect while
low balances might not be cost effective to collect; |
|
|
|
|
the age of the receivables, as older receivables might be more difficult to collect or might be
less cost effective. On the other hand, the passage of time, in certain circumstances, might result
in higher collections due to changing life events of some individual debtors; |
|
|
|
|
past history of performance of similar assets; |
|
|
|
|
time since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
payments made since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
the credit originator and its credit guidelines; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to analyze accounts and resell accounts that meet our criteria for resale; |
|
|
|
|
the locations of the debtors, as there are better states to attempt to collect in and ultimately
the Company has better predictability of the liquidations and the expected cash flows. Conversely,
there are also states where the liquidation rates are not as favorable and that is factored into
our cash flow analysis; |
|
|
|
|
jobs or property of the debtors found within portfolios. In our business model, this is of
particular importance. Debtors with jobs or property are more likely to repay their obligation and
conversely, debtors without jobs or property are less likely to repay their obligation; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain timely customer statements from the original issuer. |
The Company obtains and utilizes, as appropriate, input, including but not limited to monthly
collection projections and liquidation rates, from our third party collection agencies and
attorneys, as further evidentiary matter, to assist in evaluating and developing collection
strategies and in evaluating and modeling the expected cash flows for a given portfolio.
9
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3: Consumer Receivables Acquired for Liquidation (Continued)
The following tables summarize the changes in the balance sheet of the investment in
receivable portfolios during the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
203,470,000 |
|
|
$ |
245,542,000 |
|
|
$ |
449,012,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
1,078,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of
consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation |
|
|
(26,373,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,882,000 |
) |
|
|
(36,255,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by
account sales of consumer receivables
acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(2,348,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,425,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,773,000 |
) |
Transfer to Cost Recovery |
|
|
(6,149,000 |
) |
|
|
6,149,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(21,415,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,415,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,255,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,255,000 |
) |
Finance income recognized (1) |
|
|
18,169,000 |
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
18,416,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
166,432,000 |
|
|
$ |
237,376,000 |
|
|
$ |
403,808,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $10.2 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
508,515,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,108,000 |
|
|
$ |
545,623,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
19,916,000 |
|
|
|
17,593,000 |
|
|
|
37,509,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of
consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation (1) |
|
|
(44,896,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,206,000 |
) |
|
|
(50,102,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by
account sales of consumer receivables
acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(7,791,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,791,000 |
) |
Finance income recognized (2) |
|
|
33,836,000 |
|
|
|
299,000 |
|
|
|
34,135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
509,580,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,794,000 |
|
|
$ |
559,374,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
64.2 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the put back of a portfolio purchased and returned to the seller in the amount of $2.8
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $11.0 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
10
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3: Consumer Receivables Acquired for Liquidation (Continued)
As of December 31, 2008 the Company had $403.8 million in Consumer Receivables acquired for
Liquidation, of which $166.4 million are accounted for on the interest method. Based upon current
projections, net cash collections, applied to principal for interest method portfolios will be as
follows for the twelve months in the periods ending:
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 (nine months remaining) |
|
$ |
50,082,000 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
63,998,000 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
32,749,000 |
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
|
15,151,000 |
|
September 30, 2013 |
|
|
5,979,000 |
|
September 30, 2014 (and thereafter) |
|
|
687,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
168,646,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(2,214,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
166,432,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable yield represents the amount of income the Company can expect to generate over the
remaining life of its existing portfolios based on estimated future net cash flows as of December
31, 2008. Changes in accretable yield for the three month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
58,134,000 |
|
|
$ |
176,615,000 |
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
|
(18,169,000 |
) |
|
|
(33,836,000 |
) |
Additions representing expected revenue from purchases |
|
|
409,000 |
|
|
|
7,207,000 |
|
Transfers to Cost Recovery |
|
|
(2,477,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference |
|
|
16,055,000 |
|
|
|
22,704,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
53,952,000 |
|
|
$ |
172,690,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, the Company purchased $47.5 million of face value
of charged-off consumer receivables at a cost of $1.1 million. The entire amount is classified
under the interest method. At December 31, 2008, the estimated remaining net collections on the
receivables purchased in the three months ended December 31, 2008 is $1.3 million, of which $0.9
million represents principal.
As of December 31, 2007, the accretable yield balance at the end of the period included expected
income of $74.0 million on the $6.9 billion face value portfolio purchased at a price of $300
million in March 2007 (the Portfolio Purchase) and $4.4 million on two other portfolios
transferred to cost recovery during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. For comparative
purposes, the accretable yield as of December 31, 2007 excluding the Portfolio Purchase and two
other portfolios was $94.3 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, two portfolios were transferred from the interest
method to the cost recovery method. Based on the nature of these portfolios and the recent cash
flows, our estimates of the timing of expected cash flows became uncertain. Finance income was less
than 2% of revenue for each of the three month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, on these portfolios collectively. As a result of the transfer to the cost recovery
method, we will not recognize finance income on these two portfolios until their carrying values
are recovered. At December 2008 the combined carrying values of these portfolios were $6.1 million.
Impairments of approximately $7.4 million were recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 on
these two portfolios.
11
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3: Consumer Receivables Acquired for Liquidation (Continued)
The following table summarizes collections on a gross basis as received by the Companys
third-party collection agencies and attorneys, less commissions and direct costs for the three
month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross collections (1) |
|
$ |
65,823,000 |
|
|
$ |
89,256,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and fees (2) |
|
|
23,795,000 |
|
|
|
31,363,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net collections |
|
$ |
42,028,000 |
|
|
$ |
57,893,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gross collections include: collections from third-party collection
agencies and attorneys, collections from our in-house efforts,
collections represented by account sales and, for the three month
period ended December 31, 2007, the put back of a portfolio and
returned to the seller in the amount of $2.8 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Commissions and fees are the contractual commission earned by third
party collection agencies and attorneys, and direct costs associated
with the collection effort, generally court costs. Includes a 3% fee
charged by a servicer on gross collections received by the Company in
connection with its $300 million portfolio purchase in March 2007.
Such arrangement was consummated in December 2007. The fee is charged
for asset location, skiptracing and ultimately suing debtors in
connection with this portfolio purchase. |
Note 4: Acquisition
In October 2007, through a newly formed subsidiary, the Company acquired a portfolio of
consumer receivables domiciled in South America. The investment in the subsidiary company,
substantially all of which was applied to the cost of the portfolio, was approximately $8.6 million
in cash.
12
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 5: Furniture and Equipment
Furniture and equipment consist of the following as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Furniture |
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
2,733,000 |
|
|
|
2,714,000 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,148,000 |
|
|
|
3,129,000 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
2,457,000 |
|
|
|
2,367,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
691,000 |
|
|
$ |
762,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
6: Debt and Subordinated Debt Related Party
On July 11, 2006, the Company entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with the
Bank
Group (this amendment and all future amendments referred to as the (Credit Facility)) and as a
result the credit facility increased to $175 million, from $125 million with an expandable feature
which enables the Company to increase the line to $225 million with the consent of a consortium of
banks (the Bank Group). The line of credit bears interest at the lesser of LIBOR plus an
applicable margin, or the prime rate minus an applicable margin based on certain leverage ratios.
The credit line is collateralized by all portfolios of consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation, other than the Portfolio Purchase, discussed below, and contains customary financial
and other covenants (relative to tangible net worth, interest coverage, and leverage ratio, as
defined) that must be maintained in order to borrow funds. The term of the agreement is three years
and is to mature in July 2009. The applicable rate at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was 3.25% and
7.25%, respectively. The average interest rate excluding unused credit line fees for the period
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was 4.24% and 7.52%. The outstanding balance on
this line of credit was approximately $64.1 million as of December 31, 2008. The outstanding
balance on this line of credit was approximately $167.4 million as of December 30, 2007. The
Company and the Bank Group are in the beginning phase of discussions to renew the current Credit
Facility. If, however, a renewal cannot be ultimately agreed to, the Company, at maturity, will
consider the sale of assets collateralized by this loan agreement, to satisfy its obligations after
July 11, 2009.
On December 4, 2007, the Company signed the Sixth Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement to the Credit Facility with the Bank Group that temporarily increased the total
revolving loan commitment from $175 million to $185 million. The temporary increase of $10 million,
which was not used, was required to be repaid by February 29, 2008.
On February 20, 2009, the Company entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Credit Facility in
order to, among other items, reduce the level of the loan commitment, redefine certain financial
covenant ratios, revise the requirement for an unqualified opinion on annual audited financial
statements, and permit certain encumbrances relating to restructuring of the Bank of Montreal
(BMO) Facility (as further described below). The level of the Loan Agreement is reduced from $175
million to a low of $80 million. See Note 15: Subsequent Events for more information.
In March 2007, Palisades XVI borrowed approximately $227 million under a new Receivables Financing
Agreement (Receivables Financing Agreement), as amended in July 2007, December 2007 and May 2008,
with BMO, in order to finance the Portfolio Purchase. The Portfolio Purchase had a purchase price
of $300 million (plus 20% of net payments after Palisades XVI recovers 150% of its purchase price
plus cost of funds). Prior to the modification, discussed below, the debt was full recourse only to
Palisades XVI and bore an interest rate of approximately 170 basis points over LIBOR. The original
term of the agreement was three years. This term was extended by the second and third amendments to
the Receivables Financing Agreement as discussed below. Proceeds received as a result of the net
collections from the Portfolio Purchase are applied to interest and principal of the underlying
loan. The Portfolio Purchase is serviced by Palisades Collection LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company, which has engaged unaffiliated subservicers for a majority of the Portfolio Purchase.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the outstanding balance on this loan was approximately $119.8
million, and $158.1 million, respectively.
At September 30, 2007, Palisades XVI was required to remit an additional $13.1 million to its
lender in order to be in compliance under the Receivables Financing Agreement. The Company
facilitated the ability of Palisades XVI to make this payment by borrowing $13.1 million under its
current revolving credit facility and causing another of its subsidiaries to purchase a portion of
the Portfolio Purchase from Palisades XVI at a price of $13.1 million prior to the measurement date
under the Receivables Financing Agreement.
13
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
On December 27, 2007, Palisades XVI entered into the second amendment to its Receivables Financing
Agreement. As the actual collections had been slower than the minimum collections scheduled under
the original agreement, coupled with contemplated sales of accounts which had not occurred, BMO and
Palisades XVI agreed to an extended amortization schedule which did not contemplate the sales of
accounts. The effect of this reduction was to extend the payments of the loan from approximately 25
months to approximately 31 months from the amendment date. BMO charged Palisades XVI a fee of
$475,000 which was paid on January 10, 2008. The fee was capitalized and is being amortized over
the remaining life of the Receivables Financing Agreement.
On May 19, 2008, Palisades XVI entered into the third amendment to its Receivables Financing
Agreement. As the actual collections on the Portfolio Purchase continued to be slower than the
minimum collections scheduled under the second amendment, BMO and Palisades XVI agreed to a more
extended amortization schedule than the schedule determined in connection with the second
amendment. The effect of this amendment is to extend the payments of the loan which is now
scheduled to be repaid by December 2010, approximately nine months longer than the original term.
The lender also increased the interest rate from 170 basis points over LIBOR to approximately 320
basis points over LIBOR, subject to automatic reduction in the future if additional capital contributions are made by the parent of Palisades XVI. The applicable rate was 6.08% and 6.72% at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The average interest rate of the Receivable Financing
Agreement was 7.01% and 6.91% for the period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In
addition, on May 19, 2008, the Company entered into an amended and restated Servicing Agreement .
The amendment calls for increased documentation, responsibilities and approvals of subservicers
engaged by Palisades Collection LLC.
The aggregate minimum repayment obligations required under the third amendment to the Receivables
Financing Agreement entered into on May 19, 2008 with Palisades Acquisition XVI including interest
and principal for fiscal years ending September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2010 are $67.0 million,
and $75.0 million, respectively. As the payments are to be made on a monthly basis and the minimums
are based on averages, these minimums could vary somewhat. While the Company believes it will be
able to make all payments due under the new payment schedule, the Company also believes that if it
fails to do so, it will be required to sell the Portfolio Purchase or may be subject to a
foreclosure on the Portfolio Purchase.
As a result of the actual collections being lower than the minimum collection rates required under
the Receivables Financing Agreement for the months ended November 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
January 31, 2009, termination events occurred under the Agreement. In order to resolve these
issues, on February 20, 2009, Palisades XVI entered into the fourth amendment to its Receivables
Financing Agreement. The effect of this amendment is, among other things, to (i) lower the
collection rate minimum to $1 million per month and as an average for each period of three
consecutive months and (ii) provide for an automatic extension of the maturity date from April 30,
2011 to April 30, 2012 should the outstanding balance be reduced to $25 million or less by April
30,
2011. In addition, the rate will remain the unchanged at approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR,
subject to automatic downward adjustments in the future should certain collection milestones be
attained. See Note 15: Subsequent Events for more information on this amendment.
On April 29, 2008, the Company obtained a subordinated loan pursuant to a subordinated promissory
note from Asta Group, Inc. (the Family Entity). The Family Entity is a greater than 5%
shareholder of the Company beneficially owned and controlled by Arthur Stern, the then Chairman of
the Board of the Company, Gary Stern, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and members of
their families. The loan is in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $8.2 million, bears
interest at a rate of 6.25% per annum, is payable interest only each quarter until its maturity
date of January 9, 2010, subject to prior repayment in full of the Companys senior loan facility
with the Bank Group. The subordinated loan was incurred by the Company to resolve certain issues
related to the activities of one of the subservicers utilized by Palisades Collection L.L.C. under
the Receivables Financing Agreement. Proceeds from the subordinated loan were used initially to
further collateralize the Companys $175 million revolving loan facility with the Bank Group and
was used to reduce the balance due on that facility as of May 31, 2008.
The Companys average debt obligation (excluding the subordinated debt related party) for the
periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, was approximately $195.1 million, and $321.3 million,
respectively. The average interest rate for the Period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was 5.98%
and 7.20%, respectively.
The Companys cash requirements have been and will continue to be significant and will depend on
external financing to acquire consumer receivables. Acquisitions are financed primarily through
cash flows from operating activities and with the Companys credit facility, which matures on July
11, 2009. At December 31, 2007, March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008, due to the
borrowing base required by the Bank Group, the Company was approaching the upper limit of its
borrowing capacity. However, with limited purchases of portfolios through the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, coupled with the $8.2 million of subordinated debt acquired by the Company,
availability is approximately $18.5 million at December 31, 2008. Our borrowing availability is
limited to a formula based on the age of the receivables. As the collection environment remains
challenging, we may be required to seek additional funding. Although availability has increased,
the limited availability coupled with slower collections has had and could continue to have a
negative impact on our ability to purchase new portfolios for future growth.
If the Companys collections deteriorate below our lowest projections, the Company might need to
secure another source of funding in order to satisfy its working capital needs, downsize its
operations, or secure financing on terms that are not favorable to the Company. However, the
Company believes its net cash collections over the next twelve months will be sufficient to cover
its operating expenses.
14
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The
Companys debt and subordinated debt related party at December 31, 2008 and September 30,
2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
Credit Facility |
|
$ |
64,052,000 |
|
|
$ |
84,934,000 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
Receivables Financing Agreement |
|
|
119,804,000 |
|
|
|
128,551,000 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
183,856,000 |
|
|
$ |
213,485,000 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
debt related party |
|
$ |
8,246,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,246,000 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7: Commitments and Contingencies
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with two executives. Such agreements provide for base salary payments
as well as bonuses. The agreements also contain confidentiality and non-compete provisions. Please
refer to Part III of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, under the caption Executive Compensation for additional information.
Leases
The Company is a party to three operating leases with respect to our facilities in Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey; Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; and Sugar Land, Texas. Please refer to our
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for additional information. On February 12, 2009, the
Company announced that it was closing the collection facility located in Pennsylvania (see Note 15:
Subsequent Events for more information).
Litigation
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is involved in numerous legal proceedings.
The Company regularly initiates collection lawsuits, using its network of third party law firms,
against consumers. Also, consumers occasionally initiate litigation against the Company, in which
they allege that the Company has violated a federal or state law in the process of collecting their
account. The Company does not believe that these matters are material to its business and financial
condition. The Company is not involved in any material litigation in which it was a defendant.
15
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 8: Income Recognition, Impairments and Commissions and Fees
Income Recognition
The Company accounts for its investment in consumer receivables acquired for liquidation
using the interest method under the guidance of AICPA Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for
Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3). Practice Bulletin 6 was amended
by SOP 03-3. Under the guidance of SOP 03-3 (and the amended Practice Bulletin 6) static pools of
accounts are established. These pools are aggregated based on certain common risk criteria. Each
static pool is recorded at cost and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of
income, principal payments and loss provision.
Once a static pool is established for a quarter, individual receivable accounts are not added
to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned to
the seller). SOP 03-3 (and the amended Practice Bulletin 6) requires that the excess of the
contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or
expense or on the balance sheet. SOP 03-3 initially freezes the internal rate of return (IRR),
estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased, as the basis for subsequent impairment
testing. Significant increases in actual, or expected future cash flows may be recognized
prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over a portfolios remaining life. Any
increase to the IRR then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. Under SOP 03-3 and the
amended Practice Bulletin 6, rather than lowering the estimated IRR if the collection estimates are
not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be written down to
maintain the then current IRR.
The Company uses the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of
accounts cannot be reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no income is
recognized until the cost of the portfolio has been fully recovered. A pool can become
fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the balance sheet) while still generating cash
collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as finance income when received.
Impairments
The Company accounts for its impairments in accordance with SOP 03-3. This SOP provides
guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an
investors initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those
differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. Increases in expected cash flows
should be recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the internal rate of return while
decreases in expected cash flows should be recognized as impairments. SOP 03-3 makes it more likely
that impairment losses and accretable yield adjustments for portfolios performances which exceed
original collection projections will be recorded, as all downward revisions in collection estimates
will result in impairment charges, given the requirement that the IRR of the affected pool be held
constant. As a result of the slower economy and other factors that resulted in slower collections
on certain portfolios, impairments of $21.4 million were recorded during the quarter ended December
31, 2008. $7.4 million in impairments is related to two portfolios transferred to the cost recovery
method. One portfolio is made up of unsecured installment loans domiciled outside the
United States. Due to local market conditions, the future cash flows of this portfolio
became increasingly unpredictable. The other portfolio is made up of retail installment
contracts that have not followed the performance curves provided by our servicer with
experience in this area of the market. Based upon the forecasts not being as reliable as
first forecasted we transferred both of these portfolios to the cost recovery method. The
remaining impairments relate to the timing of and, or, the amount of collection projected to be below our original expectations. There were no impairments recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2007.
Our analysis of the timing and amount of cash flows to be generated by our portfolio purchases
are based on the following attributes:
|
|
|
the type of receivable, the location of the debtor and the number of
collection agencies previously attempting to collect the receivables in
the portfolio. We have found that there are better states to try to
collect receivables and we factor in both better and worse states when
establishing our initial cash flow expectations; |
|
|
|
|
the average balance of the receivables influence our analysis in that
lower average balance portfolios tend to be more collectible in the
short-term and higher average balance portfolios are more appropriate for
our law suit strategy and thus yield better results over the longer term.
As we have significant experience with both types of balances, we are able
to factor these variables into our initial expected cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
the age of the receivables, the number of days since charge-off, the
payments, if any, since charge-off, and the credit guidelines of the
credit originator also represent factors taken into consideration in our
estimation process since, for example, older receivables might be more
difficult to collect in amount and/or require more time to collect; |
|
|
|
|
past history and performance of similar assets acquired. As we purchase
portfolios of like assets, we accumulate a significant historical data
base on the tendencies of debtor repayments and factor this into our
initial expected cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to analyze accounts and resell accounts that meet our criteria; |
|
|
|
|
jobs or property of the debtors found within portfolios. With our business
model, this is of particular importance. Debtors with jobs or property are
more likely to repay their obligation through the suit strategy and,
conversely, debtors without jobs or property are less likely to repay
their obligation. We believe that debtors with jobs or property are more
likely to repay because courts have mandated the debtor must pay the debt.
Ultimately, the debtor will pay to clear title or release a lien. We also
believe that these debtors generally might take longer to repay and that
is factored into our initial expected cash flows; and |
|
|
|
|
credit standards of issuer. |
16
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
We acquire accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination
and the date of our acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for a portfolio of accounts
reflects our determination that it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the portfolio of accounts contractual terms. We consider the expected payments and
estimate the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows
for each acquired portfolio coupled with expected cash flows from accounts available for sales. The
excess of this amount over the cost of the portfolio, representing the excess of the accounts cash
flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into income recognized on finance
receivables over the expected remaining life of the portfolio.
We believe we have significant experience in acquiring certain distressed consumer receivable
portfolios at a significant discount to the amount actually owed by underlying debtors. We acquire
these portfolios only after both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the underlying
receivables are performed and a calculated purchase price is paid so that we believe our estimated
cash flow offers us an adequate return on our acquisition costs after our servicing expenses.
Additionally, when considering larger portfolio purchases of accounts, or portfolios from issuers
with whom we have limited experience, we have the added benefit of soliciting our third party
servicers for their input on liquidation rates and, at times, incorporate such input into the
estimates we use for our expected cash flows.
Typically, when purchasing portfolios with which we have the experience detailed above, we
have expectations of achieving a 100% return on our invested capital back within an 18-28 month
time frame and expectations of generating in the range of 130-150% of our invested capital over 3-5
years. We continue to use this as our basis for establishing the original cash flow estimates for
our portfolio purchases. We routinely monitor these results against the actual cash flows and, in
the event the cash flows are below our expectations and we believe there are no reasons relating to
mere timing differences or explainable delays (such as can occur particularly when the court system
is involved) for the reduced collections, an impairment would be recorded as a provision for credit
losses. Conversely, in the event the cash flows are in excess of our expectations and the reason is
due to timing, we would defer the excess collections and record as deferred revenue.
Commissions and fees
Commissions and fees are the contractual commissions earned by third party collection agencies
and attorneys, and direct costs associated with the collection effort- generally court costs. The
Company expects to continue to purchase portfolios and utilize third party collection agencies and
attorney networks.
Note 9: Income Taxes
Deferred federal and state taxes principally arise from (i) recognition of finance income
collected for tax purposes, but not yet recognized for financial reporting; (ii) provision for
impairments/credit losses; and (iii) compensation expense related to stock options exercised. The
provision for income tax expense for the three month periods ending December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, reflects income tax (benefit) expense at an effective rate of (40.3%) and 40.7%,
respectively.
Note 10: Net Income Per Share
Basic per share data is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly, except that it
includes the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of securities, including the effect of shares
issuable under the Companys stock based compensation plans. With respect to the assumed proceeds
from the exercise of dilutive options, the treasury stock method is calculated using the average
market price for the period.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted per share data for the three
months ended December 31, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
|
14,271,824 |
|
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
13,314,000 |
|
|
|
13,918,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Dilutive
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
885,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(7,837,000 |
) |
|
|
14,271,824 |
|
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
13,314,000 |
|
|
|
14,803,482 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, 1,036,438 options at a weighted average
exercise price of $11.68 were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculations as they were antidilutive. There were no
antidilutive securities at December 31, 2007.
17
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 11: Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation under Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2005), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R requires that compensation expense associated with stock options
and other stock based awards be recognized in the statement of operations, rather than a disclosure
in the notes to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
There were no stock awards in the first quarter of fiscal years 2009 and 2008.
Note 12: Stock Option Plans
Equity Compensation Plan
On December 1, 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the Companys Equity Compensation Plan
(the Equity Compensation Plan), subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company. The
Equity Compensation Plan was adopted to supplement the Companys existing 2002 Stock Option Plan.
In addition to permitting the grant of stock options as are permitted under the 2002 Stock Option
Plan, the Equity Compensation Plan allows the Company flexibility with respect to equity awards by
also providing for grants of stock awards (i.e. restricted or unrestricted), stock purchase rights
and stock appreciation rights. One million shares were authorized for issuance under the Equity
Compensation Plan. The Equity Compensation Plan was ratified by the shareholders on March 1, 2006.
The following description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the Equity Compensation Plan, which is included as an exhibit to the
Companys reports filed with the SEC.
The general purpose of the Equity Compensation Plan is to provide an incentive to our
employees, directors and consultants, including executive officers, employees and consultants of
any subsidiaries, by enabling them to share in the future growth of our business. The Board of
Directors believes that the granting of stock options and other equity awards promotes continuity
of management and increases incentive and personal interest in the welfare of the Company by those
who are primarily responsible for shaping and carrying out our long range plans and securing our
growth and financial success.
The Board believes that the Equity Compensation Plan will advance our interests by enhancing
our ability to (a) attract and retain employees, directors and consultants who are in a position to
make significant contributions to our success; (b) reward employees, directors and consultants for
these contributions; and (c) encourage employees, directors and consultants to take into account
our long-term interests through ownership of our shares.
18
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
12: Stock Option Plans (Continued)
The Company has 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Equity
Compensation Plan and 878,334 were available as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008,
approximately 145 of the Companys employees were eligible to participate in the Equity
Compensation Plan. On January 17, 2008 the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors awarded
58,000 shares of restricted stock. These shares vest in three equal annual installments starting on
October 1, 2008.
2002 Stock Option Plan
On March 5, 2002, the Board of Directors adopted the Asta Funding, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan
(the 2002 Plan), which plan was approved by the Companys stockholders on May 1, 2002. The 2002
Plan was adopted in order to attract and retain qualified directors, officers and employees of, and
consultants to, the Company. The following description does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2002 Plan, which is included as an
exhibit to the Companys reports filed with the SEC.
The 2002 Plan authorizes the granting of incentive stock options (as defined in Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code)) and non-qualified stock options to
eligible employees of the Company, including officers and directors of the Company(whether or not
employees) and consultants of the Company.
The Company has 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2002 Plan
and 394,334 were available as of December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 145 of
the Companys employees were eligible to participate in the 2002 Plan.
1995 Stock Option Plan
The 1995 Stock Option Plan expired on September 14, 2005. The plan was adopted in order to
attract and retain qualified directors, officers and employees of, and consultants, to the Company.
The following description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the 1995 Stock Option Plan, which is included as an exhibit to the
Companys reports filed with the SEC.
The 1995 Stock Option Plan authorized the granting of incentive stock options (as defined in
Section 422 of the Code) and non-qualified stock options to eligible employees of the Company,
including officers and directors of the Company (whether or not employees) and consultants to the
Company.
The Company authorized 1,840,000 shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 1995
Stock Option Plan. All but 96,002 shares were utilized. As of September 14, 2005, no more options
could be issued under this plan.
19
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
12: Stock Option Plans (Continued)
Compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock is recognized over the vesting
period. Compensation expense for restricted stock is based upon the market price of the shares
underlying the awards on the grant date.
The following table summarizes stock option transactions under the 2002 Stock Option Plan and
the 1995 Stock Plan (no options have been issued under the Equity Compensation Plan):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding options at the beginning of period |
|
|
1,037,438 |
|
|
$ |
11.69 |
|
|
|
1,337,438 |
|
|
$ |
9.39 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at the end of period |
|
|
1,036,438 |
|
|
$ |
11.68 |
|
|
|
1,337,438 |
|
|
$ |
9.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable options at the end of period |
|
|
1,031,438 |
|
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
|
|
1,325,438 |
|
|
$ |
9.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about the 2002 Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock
Option Plan outstanding options as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (in Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
$0.8125 $2.8750 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.63 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.63 |
|
$2.8751 $5.7500 |
|
|
106,667 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
|
106,667 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
$5.7501 $8.6250 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
$14.3751 $17.2500 |
|
|
218,611 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
15.04 |
|
|
|
218,611 |
|
|
|
15.04 |
|
$17.2501 $20.1250 |
|
|
382,160 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
18.22 |
|
|
|
382,160 |
|
|
|
18.22 |
|
$25.8751 $28.7500 |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036,438 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.68 |
|
|
|
1,031,438 |
|
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
12: Stock Option Plans (Continued)
The Company recognized $23,000 of compensation expense related to the stock option grants
during each of the three month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. As of December 31, 2008
there was $20,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards.
There was no intrinsic value of the outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31,
2008.
The following table summarizes information about restricted stock transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Unvested at the beginning of period |
|
|
61,339 |
|
|
$ |
23.06 |
|
|
|
45,333 |
|
|
$ |
28.75 |
|
Awards granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,334 |
) |
|
|
21.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at the end of period |
|
|
57,005 |
|
|
$ |
23.75 |
|
|
|
45,333 |
|
|
$ |
28.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized $258,000 and $164,000 of compensation expense related to the restricted
stock awarded during the three month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 there was $807,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock
awards.
Note 13: Stockholders Equity
During September 2008 the Company declared a cash dividend aggregating $557,000 ($0.04 per
share) which was paid November 1, 2008. In December 2008, the Company declared a quarterly dividend
of $0.02 per share, or $286,000, for shareholders of record as of December 28, 2008, which was paid
on February 2, 2009. As of December 31, 2008 stockholders equity includes an amount for other
comprehensive loss of $1.0 million which relates to the Companys investment in a company domiciled
on South America.
Note 14: Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates including
managements estimates of future cash flows and the allocation of collections between principal and
interest resulting therefrom.
21
ASTA FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 15: Subsequent Events
On February 20, 2009, the Company entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Credit Facility in
order to, among other items, reduce the level of the loan commitment, redefine certain financial
covenant ratios, revise the requirement for an unqualified opinion on annual audited financial
statements, and permit certain encumbrances relating to restructuring of the BMO Facility.
Pursuant to the Seventh Amendment, the loan commitment has been revised down from $175.0 million to
the following schedule: (1) $90.0 million until March 30, 2009, (2) $85.0 million from March 31,
2009 through June 29, 2009, and (3) $80.0 million from June 30, 2009 and thereafter. Beginning
with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 (and for each period included in calculating fixed
charge coverage ratio for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008) and continuing thereafter for
each reporting period thereafter (and for each period included in calculating fixed charge coverage
ratio for such reporting period), EBITDA and fixed charges attributable to Palisades XVI shall be
excluded from the computation of the fixed charge coverage ratio for Asta Funding and its
Subsidiaries. In addition, the fixed charge coverage ratio has been revised to exclude impairment
expense of portfolios of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation and increase the ratio from
a minimum of 1.50 to 1.0 to a minimum of 1.75 to 1.0. The permitted encumbrances under the Credit
Facility were revised to include certain encumbrances incurred by the Company in connection with
certain guarantees and liens provided to BMO Facility and the Family Entity. Further, individual
portfolio purchases in excess of $7.5 million will now require the consent of the agent and
portfolio purchases in excess of $15.0 million in the aggregate during any 120 day period will
require the consent of the Bank Group.
As a result of the actual collections being lower than the minimum collection rates required under
the Agreement for the months ended November 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and January 31, 2009,
termination events occurred under the Agreement. In order to resolve these issues, on February
20, 2009, the Company executed the Fourth Amendment to the Receivables Financing Agreement with
BMO. The effect of this Fourth Amendment is, among other things, to (i) lower the collection rate
minimum to $1 million per month (plus interest and fees) as an average for each period of three
consecutive months, (ii) provide for an automatic extension of the maturity date from April 30,
2011 to April 30, 2012 should the outstanding balance be reduced to $25 million or less by April
30, 2011 and (iii) permanently waive the previous termination events. The interest rate will
remain unchanged at approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR, subject to automatic reduction in
the future should certain collection milestones be attained.
As additional credit support for repayment by Palisades XVI of its obligations under the
Receivables Financing Agreement and as an inducement for BMO to enter into the Fourth Amendment,
the Company offered BMO a limited recourse, subordinated guaranty, secured by the assets of the
Company, in an amount not to exceed $8 million plus reasonable costs of enforcement and collection.
Under the terms of the guaranty, BMO cannot exercise any recourse against the Company until the
earlier of (i) five years from the date of the Fourth Amendment and (ii) the termination of the
Companys existing senior lending facility or any successor senior facility.
In addition, as further credit support under the Receivables Financing Agreement, the Family Entity
offered BMO a limited recourse, subordinated guaranty, secured solely by a collateral assignment of
$700,000 of the $8.2 million subordinated note executed by the Company for the benefit of the
Family Entity. The subordinated note was separated into a $700,000 note and a $7.5 million note
for such purpose. Under the terms of the guaranty, except upon the occurrence of certain
termination events, BMO cannot exercise any recourse against the Family Entity until the occurrence
of a termination event under the Receivables Financing Agreement and an undertaking of reasonable
efforts to dispose of Palisades XVIs assets. As an inducement for agreeing to make such
collateral assignment, the Family Entity was also granted a subordinated guaranty by the Company
(other than Asta Funding, Inc.) for the performance by Asta Funding, Inc. of its obligation to
repay the $8.2 million, secured by the assets of the Company (other than Asta Funding, Inc.), and
the Company agreed to indemnify the Family Entity to the extent that BMO exercises recourse in
connection with the collateral assignment. Without the consent of the agent under the senior
lending facility, the Family Entity will not be permitted to act on such guaranty, and cannot
receive payment under such indemnity, until the termination of the Companys senior lending
facility or lenders under any successor senior facility.
On
February 12, 2009 the Company announced the closing of the
collection facility located in Pennsylvania by the end of the second
fiscal quarter of 2009.
Managements preliminary estimate of the cost related to the closing of the facility is $250,000
including, but not limited to, severance costs for approximately 38 employees. The lease on the
facility is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2009. There will be no material impact on the level
of collections, as the operations will be shifted to the New Jersey location, or accounts will be
outsourced. The cost of this closure will be recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.
22
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements typically are
identified by use of terms such as may, will, should, plan, expect, believe,
anticipate, estimate and similar expressions, although some forward-looking statements are
expressed differently. Forward-looking statements represent our managements judgment regarding
future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be
correct. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report regarding
our financial position, business strategy, products, products under development and clinical
trials, markets, budgets, plans, or objectives for future operations are forward-looking
statements. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the forward-looking statements, and you should be
aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking
statements due to a number of factors, including the statements under Risk Factors and Critical
Accounting Policies detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2008, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the
additional Risk Factors detailed in Part II Item 1A, herein.
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K
and all other documents filed by the Company or with respect to its securities with the SEC are
available free of charge through our website at www.astafunding.com. Information on our website
does not constitute a part of this report. The SEC also maintains an internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports and information statements and other information regarding
issuers, such as ourselves, who file electronically with the SEC.
Overview
We are primarily engaged in the business of acquiring, managing, servicing and recovering on
portfolios of consumer receivables. These portfolios generally consist of one or more of the
following types of consumer receivables:
|
|
|
charged-off receivables accounts that have been written-off by the
originators and may have been previously serviced by collection
agencies; |
|
|
|
|
semi-performing receivables accounts where the debtor is currently
making partial or irregular monthly payments, but the accounts may
have been written-off by the originators; and |
|
|
|
|
performing receivables accounts where the debtor is making regular
monthly payments that may or may not have been delinquent in the past. |
We acquire these consumer receivable portfolios at a significant discount to the amount
actually owed by the borrowers. We acquire these portfolios after a qualitative and quantitative
analysis of the underlying receivables and calculate the purchase price so that our estimated cash
flow offers us an adequate return on our acquisition costs and servicing expenses. After purchasing
a portfolio, we actively monitor its performance and review and adjust our collection and servicing
strategies accordingly.
We purchase receivables from credit grantors and others through privately negotiated direct
sales and auctions in which sellers of receivables seek bids from several pre-qualified debt
purchasers. We pursue new acquisitions of consumer receivable portfolios on an ongoing basis
through:
|
|
|
our relationships with industry participants, collection agencies, investors and our financing sources; |
|
|
|
|
brokers who specialize in the sale of consumer receivable portfolios; and |
|
|
|
|
other sources. |
23
Critical Accounting Policies
We account for our investments in consumer receivable portfolios, using either:
|
|
|
The interest method; or |
|
|
|
|
The cost recovery method. |
As we believe our extensive liquidating experience in certain asset classes such as distressed
credit card receivables, telecom receivables, consumer loan receivables, retail installment
contracts, mixed consumer receivables, and auto deficiency receivables has matured, we use the
interest method for accounting for substantially all asset acquisitions within these classes of
receivables when we believe we can reasonably estimate the timing of the cash flows. In those
situations where we diversify our acquisitions into other asset classes in which we do not possess
the same expertise or history, or we cannot reasonably estimate the timing of the cash flows, we
utilize the cost recovery method of accounting for those portfolios of receivables.
Over time, as we continue to purchase asset classes to the point where we believe we have
developed the requisite expertise and experience, we are more likely to utilize the interest method
to account for such purchases.
The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables using the interest method under
the guidance of AICPA Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities
Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3). Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain
Acquired Loans. (Practice Bulletin 6) was amended by SOP 03-3. Under the guidance of SOP 03-3
(and the amended Practice Bulletin 6), static pools of accounts are established. These pools are
aggregated based on certain common risk criteria. Each static pool is recorded at cost and is
accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of income, principal payments and loss
provision. We currently consider for aggregation portfolios of accounts, purchased within the same
fiscal quarter, that generally have the following characteristics:
|
|
|
same issuer/originator |
|
|
|
|
same underlying credit quality |
|
|
|
|
similar geographic distribution of the accounts |
|
|
|
|
similar age of the receivable and |
|
|
|
|
same type of asset class (credit cards, telecommunications, etc.) |
After determining that an investment will yield an adequate return on our acquisition cost
after servicing fees, including court costs which are expensed as incurred, we use a variety of
qualitative and quantitative factors to determine the estimated cash flows. As previously
mentioned, included in our analysis for purchasing a portfolio of receivables and determining a
reasonable estimate of collections and the timing thereof, the following variables are analyzed and
factored into our original estimates:
|
|
|
the number of collection agencies previously attempting to collect the
receivables in the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
the average balance of the receivables; |
|
|
|
|
the age of the receivables (as older receivables might be more
difficult to collect or might be less cost effective); |
|
|
|
|
past history of performance of similar assets as we purchase
portfolios of similar assets, we believe we have built significant
history on how these receivables will liquidate and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
number of months since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
payments made since charge-off; |
|
|
|
|
the credit originator and their credit guidelines; |
|
|
|
|
the locations of the debtors as there are better states to attempt to
collect in and ultimately we have better predictability of the
liquidations and the expected cash flows. Conversely, there are also
states where the liquidation rates are not as good and that is
factored into our cash flow analysis; |
|
|
|
|
financial wherewithal of the seller; |
|
|
|
|
jobs or property of the debtors found within portfolios-with our
business model, this is of particular importance. Debtors with jobs or
property are more likely to repay their obligation and conversely,
debtors without jobs or property are less likely to repay their
obligation ; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain customer statements from the original issuer. |
24
We will obtain and utilize as appropriate input including, but not limited to, monthly
collection projections and liquidation rates, from our third party collection agencies and
attorneys, as further evidentiary matter, to assist us in developing collection strategies and in
modeling the expected cash flows for a given portfolio.
We acquire accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination
and the date of our acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for a portfolio of accounts
reflects our determination that it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the portfolio of accounts contractual terms. We consider the expected payments and
estimate the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows
for each acquired portfolio coupled with expected cash flows from accounts available for sales. The
excess of this amount over the cost of the portfolio, representing the excess of the accounts cash
flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into income recognized on finance
receivables over the expected remaining life of the portfolio.
We believe we have significant experience in acquiring certain distressed consumer receivable
portfolios at a significant discount to the amount actually owed by underlying debtors. We acquire
these portfolios only after both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the underlying
receivables are performed and a calculated purchase price is paid so that we believe our estimated
cash flow offers us an adequate return on our costs including servicing expenses. Additionally,
when considering larger portfolio purchases of accounts, or portfolios from issuers from whom we
have little or limited experience, we have the added benefit of soliciting our third party
collection agencies and attorneys for their input on liquidation rates and at times incorporate
such input into the price we offer for a given portfolio and the estimates we use for our expected
cash flows.
Typically, when purchasing portfolios for which we have the experience detailed above, we have
expectations of recovering 100% return of our invested capital back within an 18-28 month time
frame and expectations of collecting in the range of 130-150% of our invested capital over 3-5
years. Historically, we have generally been able to achieve these results and we continue to use
this as our basis for establishing the original cash flow estimates for our portfolio purchases. We
routinely monitor these results against the actual cash flows and, in the event the cash flows are
below our expectations and we believe there are no reasons relating to mere timing differences or
explainable delays (such as can occur particularly when the court system is involved) for the
reduced collections, an impairment would be recorded as a provision for credit losses. Conversely,
in the event the cash flows are in excess of our expectations and the reason is due to timing, we
would defer the excess collection as deferred revenue.
The Company uses the cost recovery method when collections on a particular pool of
accounts cannot be reasonably predicted. Under the cost recovery method, no income is
recognized until the cost of the portfolio has been fully recovered. A pool can become
fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the balance sheet) while still generating cash
collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as revenue when received.
In the following discussions, most percentages and dollar amounts have been rounded to aid
presentation. As a result, all figures are approximations.
25
Results of Operations
The three-month period ended December 31, 2008, compared to the three-month period ended
December 31, 2007.
Finance income. For the three months ended December 31, 2008, finance income decreased $15.7
million or 46.1% to $18.4 million from $34.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007.
As collections have slowed, and the environment for collections is challenging, our finance income
decreased, also in part due, to the transfer of the purchase of the $6.9 billion in face value receivables
for a purchase price of $300 million in March of 2007 (the Portfolio Purchase) from the interest
method to the cost recovery method in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. Finance income of $8.8
million was recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 as compared to zero revenue
recognized this fiscal year. In addition, the average balance of consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation decreased from $552.5 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2007 to
$427.7 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was caused by the
impairments recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 and the decline in portfolio
purchases in the final three quarters of fiscal year 2008 and continuing through the first quarter
of 2009. As the Company significantly curtailed its portfolio purchasing during this period,
purchasing only $1.1 million in new portfolios in the current quarter as compared to $37.5 million
in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, there was a significant decline of finance income in the
current quarter.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, gross collections decreased 26. 3% to $65.8
million from $89.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007. Commissions and fees
associated with gross collections from our third party collection agencies and attorneys decreased
$7.7 million, or 24.4%, to $23.7 million from $31.4 million for the three months ended December 31,
2008 as compared to the same prior year period, consistent with the decrease in gross collections.
Commissions and fees amounted to 36.0% of gross collections for the three month period ended
December 31, 2008, compared to 35.1% in the same period of the prior year. Net collections for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 decreased 27.3% to $42.1 million from $57.9 million for the
same prior year period.
Income from fully amortized portfolios (zero basis revenue) was $10.1 million for the three
month period ended December 31, 2008, compared to $11.0 million for the three month period ended
December 31, 2007.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, two portfolios were transferred from the
interest method to the cost recovery method. Based on the nature of these portfolios and the recent
cash flows, our estimates of the timing of expected cash flows became uncertain. One of the portfolios is related to unsecured installment loans domiciled outside the
United States. Due to local market conditions, the future cash flows of this portfolio
became increasingly unpredictable. The other portfolio is made up of retail installment
contracts that have not followed the performance curves provided by our servicer with
experience in this area of the market. Based upon the forecasts not being as reliable as
first forecasted we transferred both of these portfolios to the cost
recovery method. Finance income was
less than 2% of revenue for each of the three month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, on these portfolios collectively. As a result of the transfer to the cost recovery
method, we will not recognize finance income on these two portfolios until their carrying values
are recovered. At December 2008 the combined carrying values of these portfolios were $6.1 million.
Impairments of approximately $7.4 million were recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 on
these two portfolios.
Other income. Other income of $32,000 and $140, 000 for three month periods ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively includes interest income from banks and service fee income.
General and Administrative Expenses. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2008,
general and administrative expenses increased $1.2 million or 21.1% to $7.0 million from $5.8
million for the three-months ended December 31, 2007, and represented 22.2% of total expenses
(excluding income taxes) for the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 49.4%
for the three- month period ended December 31, 2007. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was due to an increase in collection expenses that resulted from a greater number of legal
settlements. Additionally, amortization expense was higher due to
loan amendments and related legal fees incurred during the second half of fiscal year 2008. Furthermore, stock based compensation expense increased in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared to the same prior year period.
Interest Expense. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, interest expense decreased
$2.7 million or 46.6% from $5.9 million to $3.2 million for the same period in the prior year and
represented 10.0% of total expenses (excluding income taxes) for the three-month period ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to 50.6% for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007. The
lower interest expense in the 2008 fiscal quarter is primarily a reflection of decreased
borrowings. In addition to the continuing paydown of the BMO loan, lower borrowings on our credit
facility are attributable to reduced portfolio purchasing
requirements. Additionally, interest rates
on total average debt are lower in the current fiscal quarter compared to that in the same prior
year quarter (a 5.98% average rate on total debt, excluding the subordinated debt related party
as compared to a 7.20% average rate last year).
Impairments. The Company recorded impairments of $21.4 million for the three-month period ended
December 31, 2008, which represents 67.8% of total expense (excluding income taxes). Of the $21.4 million of impairments, $7.4 million related to the two portfolios transferred
to the cost recovery method, as more fully described under Finance income, above. The
remaining impairments relate the timing and, or, the amount of collections projected to be below our original expectations. There were no impairments
recorded during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007.
26
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of cash from operations is collections on the receivable portfolios we have
acquired. Our primary uses of cash include repayments under our line of credit, purchases of
consumer receivable portfolios, interest payments, costs involved in the collections of consumer
receivables, dividends and taxes. Management believes the results of operations will provide
enough liquidity to meet our obligations of the business and be in
compliance with debt covenants. We rely significantly upon our lenders to provide the funds necessary for the purchase of consumer
accounts receivable portfolios. As of December 31, 2008, we had a $175 million line of credit with
a consortium of banks (the Bank Group) for portfolio purchases (the Credit Facility). The
Credit Facility bears interest at the lesser of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or the prime rate
minus an applicable margin based on certain leverage ratios. The Credit Facility is collateralized
by all portfolios of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation and all other assets of the
Company excluding the assets of Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company (Palisades XVI), and contains financial and other covenants (relative to tangible net
worth, interest coverage, and leverage ratio, as defined) that must be maintained in order to
borrow funds. As of December 31, 2008, there was a $64.1 million outstanding balance under this
facility and availability of $18.5 million. Our borrowing availability is based on a formula
calculated on the age of the receivables. Availability has remained at approximately the same
level as the end of the fiscal year. The balance outstanding at December 31, 2007 was $167.4
million. Although we are within the borrowing limits of this facility, there are certain
limitations in place with regard to collateralization whereby the Company may be limited in its
ability to borrow funds to purchase additional portfolios. On March 30, 2007 the Company signed the
Third Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (this and all future amendments
referred to as (the Credit Facility)) with the Bank Group that amended certain terms of the
Credit Facility, whereby the parties agreed to a Temporary Overadvance of $16 million to be reduced
to zero on or before May 17, 2007. In addition, the parties agreed to an increase in interest rate
to LIBOR plus 275 basis points for LIBOR loans, an increase from 175 basis points. The rate is
subject to adjustment each quarter upon delivery of results that evidence a need for an adjustment.
As of May 7, 2007, the Temporary Overadvance was approximately $12 million. On May 10, 2007, the
Company signed the Fourth Amendment to the Credit Facility whereby the parties agreed to revise
certain terms of the agreement which eliminated the Temporary Overadvance provision. On June 26,
2007 the Company signed the Fifth Amendment to the Credit Facility with the Bank Group that amended
certain terms of the Credit Agreement whereby the parties agreed to further amend the definition of
the Borrowing Base and increase the advance rates on portfolio purchases allowing the Company more
borrowing availability within the $175 million upper limit. On December 4, 2007, the Company signed
the Sixth Amendment to the Credit Facility with the Bank Group that temporarily increased the total
revolving loan commitment from $175 million to $185 million. If utilized, the increase of $10
million was required to be repaid by February 29, 2008. The temporary increase was not used.
The term of the Credit Facility ends July 11, 2009. If the loan agreement cannot be renewed at
maturity, we believe we can sell any of the assets secured by this line of credit, which is all
assets of the Company except those owned by Palisades XVI. On
February 20, 2009, the Company and
the Bank Group entered into the Seventh Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated loan Agreement.
See below for more information.
In March 2007, Palisades XVI consummated the Portfolio Purchase. The Portfolio Purchase is made up
of predominantly credit card accounts and includes accounts in collection litigation, accounts as
to which the sellers had been awarded judgments, and other traditional charge-offs. The Companys
line of credit with the Bank Group was fully utilized, as modified in February 2007, with the
aggregate deposit of $75 million paid for the Portfolio Purchase.
The remaining $225 million was paid on March 5, 2007 by borrowing approximately $227 million
(inclusive of transaction costs) under the Receivables Financing Agreement entered into by
Palisades XVI with BMO as the funding source, and consists of debt with full recourse only to
Palisades XVI, bore an interest rate of approximately 170 basis points over LIBOR at the inception
of the agreement. The term of the original agreement was three years. All proceeds received as a
result of the net collections from the Portfolio Purchase are applied to interest and principal of
the underlying loan. The Company made certain representations and warranties to the lender to
support the transaction. The Portfolio Purchase is serviced by Palisades Collection, LLC, a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company, which has also engaged several unrelated subservicers. As of
December 31, 2008, there was a $119.8 million outstanding balance under this facility.
On December 27, 2007, Palisades XVI entered into the second amendment of its Receivables Financing
Agreement. As the actual collections had been slower than the minimum collections scheduled under
the original agreement, which contemplated sales of accounts which had not occurred, the lender and
Palisades XVI agreed to a lower amortization schedule which did not contemplate the sales of
accounts. The effect of this reduction was to extend the payments of the loan from approximately 25
months to approximately 31 months from the date of the second amendment. The lender charged
Palisades XVI a fee of $475,000 which was paid on January 10, 2008. The fee was capitalized and is
being amortized over the remaining life of the Receivables Financing Agreement.
On May 19, 2008, Palisades XVI entered into the third amendment of its Receivables Financing
Agreement. As the actual collections on the Portfolio Purchase continued to be slower than the
minimum collections scheduled under the second amendment, the lender and Palisades XVI agreed to an
extended amortization schedule. The effect of this reduction is to extend the length of the
original loan to three years, nine months, an extension of nine months. The lender also increased
the interest rate to approximately 320 basis points (from 170 basis points) over LIBOR, subject to
automatic reduction in the future if additional capital contributions are made by the parent of
Palisades XVI. In addition, on May 19, 2008, the Company entered into an amended and restated
Servicing Agreement
among Palisades XVI, Palisades Collection, L.L.C. and the BMO (the Servicing Agreement). The
amendment calls for increased documentation, responsibilities and approvals of subservicers engaged
by Palisades Collection L.L.C.
27
On April 29, 2008, the Company obtained a subordinated loan pursuant to a subordinated promissory
note from Asta Group, Inc. ( the Family Entity). The loan is in the aggregate principal amount of
$8.2 million, bears interest at a rate of 6.25% per annum, is payable interest only each quarter
until its maturity date of January 9, 2010, subject to prior repayment in full of the Companys
senior loan facility with the Bank Group. Interest expense on this loan was $154,000 from the
inception of the loan through September 30, 2008.
The subordinated loan was incurred by the Company to resolve certain issues described below.
Proceeds of the subordinated loan were used to reduce the balance due on our line of credit with
the Bank Group on June 13, 2008. This facility is secured by the Bank Group Collateral, other than
the assets of Palisades XVI, which was separately financed by the BMO Facility.
The Servicer that provides servicing for certain portfolios within the Bank Group Collateral, was
also engaged by Palisades Collection, LLC, after the initial purchase of the Portfolio Purchase in
March 2007, to provide certain management services with respect to the portfolios owned by
Palisades XVI and financed by the BMO Facility and to provide subservicing functions for portions
of the Portfolio Purchase. Collections with respect to the Portfolio Purchase, and most portfolios
purchased by the Company, lag the costs and fees which are expended to generate those collections,
particularly when court costs are advanced to pursue an aggressive litigation strategy, as is the
case with the Portfolio Purchase. Start-up cash flow issues with respect to the Portfolio Purchase
were exacerbated by (a) collection challenges caused by the current economic environment, (b) the
fact that Palisades Collection believed that it would be desirable to engage the Servicer to
perform management services with respect to the Portfolio Purchase which services were not
contemplated at the time of the initial Portfolio Purchase and (c) Palisades Collection believed it
would be desirable to commence litigations and incur court costs at a faster rate than initially
budgeted. The agreements with the Servicer call for a 3%fee on substantially all gross collections
from the Portfolio Purchase on the first $500 million and 7% on substantially all collections from
the Portfolio Purchase in excess of $500 million. Additionally, the Company pays the Servicer a
monthly fee of $275,000 for twenty-five months commencing May 2007 for its consulting, asset
identification and skiptracing efforts in connection with the Portfolio Purchase. The Servicer also
receives a servicing fee with respect to those accounts it actually subservices. As the fees due to
the Servicer for management and subservicing functions and the amounts spent for court costs were
higher than those initially contemplated for subservicing functions, and as start-up collections
with respect to the Portfolio Purchase were slower than initially projected, the amounts owed to
the Servicer with respect to the Portfolio Purchase for fees and advances for court costs to pursue
litigation against debtors have to date exceeded amounts available to pay the Servicer from
collections received by the Servicer on the Portfolio Purchase on a current basis. The Company
considered the effects of these trends on portfolio valuation.
Rather than waiting for collections from the Portfolio Purchase to satisfy sums of approximately
$8.2 million due it for court cost advances and its fees, the Servicer set-off that amount against
amounts it had collected on behalf of the Company with respect to the Bank Group Collateral. While
the Servicer disagrees, the Company believes that those sums should have been remitted to the Bank
Group without setoff.
The Company determined to remedy any shortfall in the receipts due to the Bank Group by obtaining
the $8.2 million subordinated loan from the Family Entity and causing the proceeds of the loan to
be delivered to the Bank Group and not to pursue a dispute with the Servicer at this time. The
Company believed that avoiding a dispute with the Servicer was in its best interests. Although we
have not experienced an increase in collections as of December 31, 2008, the arrangement should
improve collections on the Portfolio Purchase.
On April 29, 2008, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Bank Group in which the
Bank Group consented to the Subordinated Loan from the Family Entity. On January 18, 2009, the
Company entered into amended agreements with the Servicer pursuant to which the Servicer agreed
that it will not make any further setoffs against collections. The Company believes that any future
sums due to the Servicer will be available from the cash flow of the Portfolio Purchase.
28
On February 20, 2009, the Company entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Credit Facility in
order to, among other items, reduce the level of the loan commitment, redefine certain financial
covenant ratios, revise the requirement for an unqualified opinion on annual audited financial
statements, and permit certain encumbrances relating to restructuring of the BMO Facility. Pursuant
to the Seventh Amendment, the loan commitment has been revised down from $175.0 million to the
following schedule: (1) $90.0 million until March 30, 2009, (2) $85.0 million from March 31, 2009
through June 29, 2009, and (3) $80.0 million from June 30, 2009 and thereafter. In addition, the
Company shall pay interest to the Bank Group at the following rates: the lesser of LIBOR plus an
applicable margin or the prime rate plus an applicable margin per annum or, at the election of the
Company, the applicable LIBOR Rate plus the Applicable LIBOR Margin per annum, based on the
aggregate Advances outstanding from time to time; provided, however, at no time shall the interest
rate be less than five hundred (500) basis points per annum. Beginning with the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2008 (and for each period included in calculating fixed charge coverage ratio for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2008) and continuing thereafter for each reporting period
thereafter (and for each period included in calculating fixed charge coverage ratio for such
reporting period), EBITDA and fixed charges attributable to Palisades XVI shall be excluded from
the computation of the fixed charge coverage ratio for Asta Funding and its Subsidiaries. In
addition, the fixed charge coverage has been revised to exclude impairment expense of portfolios of
consumer receivables acquired for liquidation and increase the ratio from a minimum of 1.50 to 1.0
to a minimum of 1.75 to 1.0. In addition, the Seventh Amendment provides that a qualification on
the Companys audited financial statements, as consolidated, resulting solely from the Bank Group
maturity date being scheduled to occur in less than one year shall not be deemed to violate the Credit Agreement. The permitted
encumbrances under the Credit Agreement were revised to include certain encumbrances incurred by
the Company in connection with certain guarantees and liens provided to BMO Facility and the Family
Entity. Further, individual portfolio purchases in excess of $7.5 million will now require the
consent of the agent and portfolio purchases in excess of $15.0 million in the aggregate during any
120 day period will require the consent of the Bank Group. The Company and the Bank Group are in
the beginning phase of discussions to renew the current Loan Agreement. If, however, a renewal
cannot be ultimately agreed to, the Company, at maturity, will consider the sale of assets
collateralized by this loan agreement, to satisfy its obligations after July 11, 2009.
As a result of the actual collections being lower than the minimum collection rates required under
the
Receivables Financing Agreement for the months ended November 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
January 31,
2009, termination events occurred under the Receivables Financing Agreement. In order to resolve
these issues, on
February 20, 2009, we executed the Fourth Amendment to the Receivables Financing Agreement with
BMO. The
effect of this Fourth Amendment is, among other things, to (i) lower the collection rate minimum to
$1 million per
month (plus interest and fees) as an average for each period of three consecutive months, (ii)
provide for an automatic extension of the
maturity date from April 30, 2011 to April 30, 2012 should the outstanding balance be reduced to
$25 million or less
by April 30, 2011 and (iii) permanently waive the termination events. The interest rate will remain
unchanged at
approximately 320 basis points over LIBOR, subject to automatic reduction in the future should
certain collection
milestones be attained.
As additional credit support for repayment by Palisades XVI of its obligations under the
Receivables Financing Agreement and as an inducement for BMO to enter into the Fourth Amendment,
the Company offered BMO a limited recourse, subordinated guaranty, secured by the assets of the
Company, in an amount not to exceed $8 million plus reasonable costs of enforcement and collection.
Under the terms of the guaranty, BMO cannot exercise any recourse against the Company until the
earlier of (i) five years from the date of the Fourth Amendment and (ii) the termination of the
Companys existing senior lending facility or any successor senior facility.
In addition, as further credit support under the Receivables Financing Agreement, the Family Entity
offered
BMO a limited recourse, subordinated guaranty, secured solely by a collateral assignment of
$700,000 of the
$8.2 million subordinated note executed by the Company for the benefit of the Family Entity. The
subordinated note
was separated into a $700,000 note and a $7.5 million note for such purpose. Under the terms of the
guaranty, except
upon the occurrence of certain termination events, BMO cannot exercise any recourse against the
Family Entity
until the occurrence of a termination event under the Receivables Financing Agreement and an
undertaking of
reasonable efforts to dispose of Palisades XVIs assets. As an inducement for agreeing to make such
collateral
assignment, the Family Entity was also granted a subordinated guaranty by the Company (other than
Asta Funding,
Inc.) for the performance by Asta Funding, Inc. of its obligation to repay the $8.2 million,
secured by the assets of
the Company (other than Asta Funding, Inc.), and the Company agreed to indemnify the Family Entity
to the extent
that BMO exercises recourse in connection with the collateral assignment. Without the consent of
the agent under
the senior lending facility, the Family Entity will not be permitted to act on such guaranty, and
cannot receive
payment under such indemnity, until the termination of the Companys senior lending facility or
lenders under any
successor senior facility. As a result of the Companys current capital structure and their
interrelated components, it
may be difficult to obtain new financing.
29
As of December 31, 2008, our cash decreased $1,901,000 to $1.7 million from $3.6 million at
September 30, 2008, including a $64,000 positive effect of foreign exchange on cash. The decrease
in cash during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, was due to a decrease in net cash provided
by operating activities for the period and a decrease in cash flows from financing activities
offset by an increase in cash flows from investing activities due to the decrease in the purchases
of accounts acquired for liquidation.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $3.5 million during the three months ended
December 31, 2008, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $14.1 million during
the three months ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities
was primarily due to an increase in deferred taxes during the three months ended December 31, 2008,
as compared to the same prior year period. The decrease in net income is essentially the result of
the recording of impairments during the three months ended
December 31, 2008, a non-cash item. Net
cash provided by investing activities was $23.9 million during the three months ended December 31
as compared to $13.1 million net cash used in investing activities for the same prior year period.
The primary reason for the increase in cash provided by investing activities is the reduction in
the purchase of consumer receivables acquired for liquidation from $37.5 million in the fiscal 2008
quarter to $1.1 million in the fiscal 2009 quarter. The foreign exchange effect on receivables
acquired for liquidation was mostly offset by the reduced cash
distribution received from our investment in venture. Net cash used in financing activities was $29.4 million during the three-months ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $57,000 during the three-months ended December 31, 2007. The change
in cash flows from financing activities is primarily due to the increased repayments of debt
during the three month period ended December 31, 2008 of $29.7 million as compared to
repayments of $1.0 million during the three month period ended December 31, 2007.
Our cash requirements have been and will continue to be significant. Our primary uses of cash
include repayments under our line of credit, purchases of consumer receivable portfolios, interest
payments, costs involved in the collections of consumer receivables, dividends and taxes. We depend
on external financing and cash generated from operations to acquire consumer receivables. These
acquisitions were financed primarily through cash flows from operating activities and with our
credit facility. As the collection environment continues to be challenging, we
may be required to seek additional funding. This coupled with slower collections could have a
negative impact on our ability to purchase new portfolios for future growth.
From time to time, we evaluate potential acquisitions of related businesses but we may not be
able to complete any acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all. We may consider possible
acquisition of, or investment in, complimentary businesses. Any such possible acquisition, or
investments, may be material and may require us to incur a significant amount of debt or issue a
significant amount of equity securities. Further, any business that we acquire or invest in, will
likely have its own capital needs, which may be significant, and which we may be called on to
satisfy.
30
The following tables summarize the changes in the balance sheet of the investment in
receivable portfolios during the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
203,470,000 |
|
|
$ |
245,542,000 |
|
|
$ |
449,012,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
1,078,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of
consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation |
|
|
(26,373,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,882,000 |
) |
|
|
(36,255,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by
account sales of consumer receivables
acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(2,348,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,425,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,773,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to Cost Recovery |
|
|
(6,149,000 |
) |
|
|
6,149,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
(21,415,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,415,000 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,255,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,255,000 |
) |
Finance income recognized (1) |
|
|
18,169,000 |
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
18,416,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
166,432,000 |
|
|
$ |
237,376,000 |
|
|
$ |
403,808,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
63.3 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $10.2 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Portfolios |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
508,515,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,108,000 |
|
|
$ |
545,623,000 |
|
Acquisitions of receivable portfolios, net |
|
|
19,916,000 |
|
|
|
17,593,000 |
|
|
|
37,509,000 |
|
Net cash collections from collection of
consumer receivables acquired for
liquidation (1) |
|
|
(44,896,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,206,000 |
) |
|
|
(50,102,000 |
) |
Net cash collections represented by
account sales of consumer receivables
acquired for liquidation |
|
|
(7,791,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,791,000 |
) |
Finance income recognized (2) |
|
|
33,836,000 |
|
|
|
299,000 |
|
|
|
34,135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
509,580,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,794,000 |
|
|
$ |
559,374,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue as a percentage of collections |
|
|
64.2 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the put back of a portfolio purchased and returned to the seller in the amount of $2.8
million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $11.0 million derived from fully amortized interest method pools. |
Additional Supplementary Information:
We do not anticipate collecting the majority of the purchased principal amounts. Accordingly,
the difference between the carrying value of the portfolios and the gross receivables is not
indicative of future revenues from these accounts acquired for liquidation. Since we purchased
these accounts at significant discounts, we anticipate collecting only a portion of the face
amounts. During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we purchased portfolios with an aggregate
purchase price of $1.1 million, having a face value of $47.5 million. During the three months
ended December 31, 2007, we purchased $1.1 billion of face value portfolios with an aggregate
purchase price of $37.5 million.
31
Prior to October 1, 2005, the Company accounted for its investment in finance receivables
using the interest method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on
Certain Acquired Loans. Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted and began to account for
its investment in finance receivables using the interest method under the guidance of AICPA
Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for
Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer. (SOP 03-3) Practice Bulletin 6 was amended
by SOP 03-3. Under the guidance of SOP 03-3 (and the amended Practice Bulletin 6); static pools of
accounts are established. These pools are aggregated based on certain common risk criteria. Each
static pool is recorded at cost and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of
income, principal payments and loss provision. Once a static pool is established for a quarter,
individual receivable accounts are not added to the pool (unless replaced by the seller) or removed
from the pool (unless sold or returned to the seller). SOP 03-3 (and the amended Practice Bulletin
6) requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be
recognized as an adjustment of revenue or expense or on the balance sheet. SOP 03-3 initially
freezes the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, estimated when the accounts receivable are
purchased, as the basis for subsequent impairment testing. Significant increases in actual, or
expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR
over a portfolios remaining life. Any increase to the IRR then becomes the new benchmark for
impairment testing. Effective for fiscal years beginning October 1, 2005 under SOP 03-3 and the
amended Practice Bulletin 6, rather than lowering the estimated IRR if the collection estimates are
not received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be written down to
maintain the then current IRR.
Collections Represented by Account Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Represented |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
|
By Account |
|
|
Income |
|
Period |
|
Sales |
|
|
Earned |
|
Three months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5,773,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,373,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
7,791,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,353,000 |
|
Portfolio Performance (1)
(Interest method portfolios only)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collections |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Collections as a |
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Including Cash |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Purchase Period |
|
Price (2) |
|
|
Sales (3) |
|
|
Collections (4) |
|
|
Collections (5) |
|
|
Purchase Price |
|
2001 |
|
$ |
65,120,000 |
|
|
$ |
105,349,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
105,349,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
2002 |
|
|
36,557,000 |
|
|
|
47,889,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
47,889,000 |
|
|
|
131 |
% |
2003 |
|
|
115,626,000 |
|
|
|
206,023,000 |
|
|
|
2,325,000 |
|
|
|
208,348,000 |
|
|
|
180 |
% |
2004 |
|
|
103,743,000 |
|
|
|
173,872,000 |
|
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
176,272,000 |
|
|
|
170 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
126,023,000 |
|
|
|
189,962,000 |
|
|
|
33,072,000 |
|
|
|
223,034,000 |
|
|
|
177 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
177,165,000 |
|
|
|
211,894,000 |
|
|
|
74,614,000 |
|
|
|
286,508,000 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
109,235,000 |
|
|
|
64,235,000 |
|
|
|
88,653,000 |
|
|
|
152,888,000 |
|
|
|
140 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
25,622,000 |
|
|
|
17,686,000 |
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
35,686,000 |
|
|
|
139 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
1,078,000 |
|
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
1,320,000 |
|
|
|
1,507,000 |
|
|
|
140 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total collections do not represent full collections of the Company with respect to this or any other year. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase price refers to the cash paid to a seller to acquire a portfolio less the purchase price
refunded by a seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts (also defined as put-backs). |
|
(3) |
|
Net cash collections include: net collections from our third-party collection agencies and attorneys, net
collections from our in-house efforts and collections represented by account sales. |
|
(4) |
|
Does not include collections from portfolios that are zero basis. |
|
(5) |
|
Total estimated collections refer to the actual net cash collections, including cash sales, plus
estimated remaining net collections. |
32
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
110 (SAB 110). This staff accounting bulletin (SAB) expresses the views of the staff regarding
the use of a simplified method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in developing an
estimate of expected term of plain vanilla share options in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment . In particular,
the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a companys election to use the simplified
method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates
of expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external
information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or
other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to companies. Therefore,
the staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for
share option grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed information
about employee exercise behavior might not have been widely available by December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the
simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. This SAB does not have a material impact on the
Company.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to provide companies
with the option to recognize most financial assets and liabilities and certain other items at fair
value. Statement 159 will allow companies the opportunity to mitigate earnings volatility caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
should be reported in earnings. The fair value option election is applied on an instrument by
instrument basis (with some exceptions), is irrevocable, and is applied to an entire instrument.
The election may be made as of the date of initial adoption for existing eligible items. Subsequent
to initial adoption, the Company may elect the fair value option at initial recognition of eligible
items or on entering into an eligible firm commitment. The Company can only elect the fair value
option after initial recognition in limited circumstances.
SFAS No. 159 requires similar assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the
fair value option to be displayed on the face of the balance sheet either (a) together with
financial instruments measured using other measurement attributes with parenthetical disclosure of
the amount measured at fair value or (b) in separate line items. In addition, SFAS No. 159 requires
additional disclosures to allow financial statement users to compare similar assets and liabilities
measured differently either within the financial statements of the Company or between financial
statements of different companies.
SFAS No. 159 was required to be adopted by the Company on October 1, 2008. Early adoption was
permitted; however, the Company did not adopt SFAS No. 159 prior to the required adoption date of
October 1, 2008. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 159 concurrent with SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. The remeasurement to fair-value will be reported as a cumulative-effect
adjustment in the opening balance of retained earnings. Additionally, any changes in fair value due
to the concurrent adoption of SFAS No. 157 will be included in the cumulative-effect adjustment if
the fair value option is also elected for that item.
The Company opted to not apply the fair value option to any of its financial assets or
liabilities. If the Company elects to recognize items at fair value as a result of Statement 159,
this could result in increased earnings volatility.
In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. Effective October 1,
2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157. The Statement defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not impact the
Companys financial reporting or disclosure requirements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of business, including the
impact of interest rate changes and changes in corporate tax rates. A material change in these
rates could adversely affect our operating results and cash flows. At December 31, 2008, our $175
million credit facility and our Receivable Financing Agreement, all of which is variable debt, had
an outstanding balance of $64.1 million and $119.8 million, respectively. A 25 basis-point increase
in interest rates would have increased our interest expense for the current quarter by
approximately $122,000 based on the average debt outstanding during the period. We do not currently
invest in derivative financial or commodity instruments.
33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we carried out an
evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
b. Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of our business, we are involved in numerous legal proceedings. We
regularly initiate collection lawsuits, using our network of third party law firms, against
consumers. Also, consumers occasionally initiate litigation against us, in which they allege that
we have violated a federal or state law in the process of collecting their account. We do not
believe that these ordinary course matters are material to our business and financial condition. As
of the date of this Form 10-Q, we were not involved in any material litigation in which we were a
defendant.
Item 1A. Risk factors
There were no material changes in any risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys
Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission on February 20, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J.
Michel, pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J.
Michel, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASTA FUNDING, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: February 26, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Gary Stern
|
|
|
|
Gary Stern, President, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Date: February 26, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Michel
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Michel, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J.
Michel, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer, Gary
Stern, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer, Robert J.
Michel, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |