UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K |
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35198
Pandora Media, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware | 94-3352630 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2101 Webster Street, Suite 1650 Oakland, CA | 94612 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(510) 451-4100 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common stock, $0.0001 par value | The New York Stock Exchange |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2014 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second quarter), based on the closing price of such stock on The New York Stock Exchange on such date was approximately $4,656 million. This calculation excludes the shares of common stock held by executive officers, directors and stockholders whose ownership exceeds 5% outstanding at June 30, 2014. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes.
On February 6, 2015 the registrant had 209,120,360 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), to be filed within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof. Except with respect to information specifically incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Definitive Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Pandora Media, Inc.
Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Page No. | ||
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), including, but not limited to, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions, strategies, future operations, future financial position, future revenue, projected expenses and plans and objectives of management. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "might," "plan," "project," "will," "would," "should," "could," "can," "predict," "potential," "continue," "objective," or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements reflect, in our current views about future events and involve known risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled "Risk Factors" included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. In addition, the industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors including those described in the section entitled "Risk Factors." These and other factors could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Some of the industry and market data contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on independent industry publications, including those generated by Triton Digital Media or "Triton" and International Data Corporation or "IDC" or other publicly available information. This information involves a number of assumptions and limitations. Although we believe that each source is reliable as of its respective date, we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of this information.
As used herein, "Pandora," the "Company," "we," "our," and similar terms refer to Pandora Media, Inc., unless the context indicates otherwise.
"Pandora" and other trademarks of ours appearing in this report are our property. This report contains additional trade names and trademarks of other companies. We do not intend our use or display of other companies' trade names or trademarks to imply an endorsement or sponsorship of us by such companies, or any relationship with any of these companies.
EXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING THE ANNUAL REPORT
We changed our fiscal year from the twelve months ending January 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2013. As a result of this change, our prior fiscal year was an eleven-month transition period ended on December 31, 2013.
When financial results for the 2014 annual period are compared to financial results for the prior year period, the results compare the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014 and the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2013. When financial results for the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2013 are compared to financial results for the prior year period, the results compare the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2013 and the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2012. The results for the eleven month period ended December 31, 2012 are unaudited. The following tables show the months included within the various comparison periods:
1
Calendar 2014 (12-month) Results Compared With Calendar 2013 (11-month) | ||
Calendar 2013 (11-month) | Calendar 2014 (12-month) | |
February 2013 - December 2013 | January 2014 - December 2014 | |
Calendar 2013 (11-month) Results Compared With Calendar 2012 (11-month recast, unaudited) | ||
Calendar 2012 (11-month recast, unaudited) | Calendar 2013 (11-month) | |
February 2012 - December 2012 | February 2013 - December 2013 | |
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Pandora is the leader in internet radio in the United States, offering a personalized experience for each of our listeners wherever and whenever they want to listen to radio on a wide range of smartphones, tablets, computers and car audio systems, as well as a range of other internet-connected devices. Our vision is to be the effortless source of personalized music entertainment and discovery for billions. The majority of our listener hours occur on mobile devices, with the majority of our revenue generated from advertising on these devices. We have pioneered a new form of radio—one that uses intrinsic qualities of music to initially create stations and then adapts playlists in real-time based on the individual feedback of each listener. We offer local and national advertisers an opportunity to deliver targeted messages to our listeners using a combination of audio, display and video advertisements.
As of December 31, 2014, we had more than 250 million registered users, which we define as the total number of accounts that have been created for our service at period end. As of December 31, 2014, more than 225 million registered users had accessed Pandora through smartphones and tablets. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we streamed 20.03 billion hours of internet radio, and as of December 31, 2014, we had 81.5 million active users during the prior 30 day period. Since we launched our free, advertising-supported radio service in 2005 our listeners have created over 7 billion stations.
Our Service
Unlike traditional radio stations that broadcast the same content at the same time to all of their listeners, we enable each of our listeners to create up to 100 personalized stations. The Music Genome Project and our playlist generating algorithms power our ability to predict listener music preferences, play music content suited to the tastes of each individual listener and introduce listeners to music we think they will love. When a listener enters a single song, artist, comedian or genre to start a station—a process we call seeding—the Pandora service instantly generates a station that plays music we think that listener will enjoy. Based on listener reactions to the songs we pick, we further tailor the station to match the listener's preferences. Listeners also have the ability to add variety to and rename stations, which further allows for the personalization of our service.
We currently provide the Pandora service through two models:
• | Free Service. Our free service is advertising-based and allows listeners access to our music and comedy catalogs and personalized playlist generating system for free across all of our delivery platforms. |
• | Pandora One. Pandora One is a paid subscription service without any advertising. Pandora One also enables listeners to have more daily skips, enjoy higher quality audio on supported devices and enjoy longer timeout-free listening. |
Beyond song delivery, listeners can discover more about the music they hear by reading the history of their favorite artists, viewing artist photos and buying albums and songs from Amazon or iTunes. Our service also incorporates community social networking features. Our music feed feature enables a real-time, centralized stream for listeners to view the music that their social connections are experiencing and to provide and receive recommendations for songs, albums and artists. Listeners can also share their stations across other social media outlets and through email by using our share feature or by distributing our individualized station URLs.
Our Technologies
At the core of our service is our set of proprietary personalization technologies, including the Music Genome Project and our playlist generating algorithms. When a listener enters a single song, artist or genre to start a station, the Pandora service instantly generates a station that plays music we think that listener will enjoy. Based on listener reactions to the songs we stream, we further tailor the station to match the listener's preferences in real-time.
Music Genome Project
The Music Genome Project is a database of over 1,000,000 uniquely analyzed songs from over 125,000 artists, spanning over 600 genres and sub-genres, which we develop one song at a time by evaluating and cataloging each song's particular attributes. Once we select music to become part of our catalog, our music analysts genotype the music by examining up to 450
3
attributes including objectively observable metrics such as tone and tempo, as well as subjective characteristics, such as lyrics, vocal texture and emotional intensity. We employ rigorous hiring and training standards for selecting our music analysts, who typically have four-year degrees in music theory, composition or performance, and we provide them with intensive training in the Music Genome Project's precise methodology.
Comedy Genome Project
Our Comedy Genome Project leverages similar technology to that underlying the Music Genome Project, allowing a listener to choose a favorite comedian or a genre as a seed to start a station and then give feedback to personalize that station. Our comedy collection includes content from more than 2,000 comedians with more than 30,000 tracks.
Our Other Core Innovations
In addition to the Music Genome Project, we have developed other proprietary technologies to improve delivery of the Pandora service, enhance the listener experience and expand our reach. Our other core innovations include:
Playlist Generating Algorithms. We have developed complex algorithms that determine which songs play and in what order on each personalized station. Developed since 2004, these algorithms combine the Music Genome Project with the individual and collective feedback we receive from our listeners in order to deliver a personalized listening experience.
Pandora User Experience. We have invested in ways to enable us to reach our audience anytime, anywhere that they enjoy music. To this end, we have developed a number of innovative approaches, including our autocomplete station creation feature, which predicts and generates a list of the most likely musical starting points as a listener begins to enter a favorite station, song or artist.
Pandora Mobile Streaming. We have designed a sophisticated system for streaming music content to mobile devices. This system involves a combination of music coding programs that are optimized for mobile devices as well as algorithms designed to address the intricacies of reliable delivery over diverse mobile network technologies. For example, these algorithms are designed to maintain a continuous stream to a listener even in circumstances where the mobile data network may be unreliable.
Automotive Protocol. We have developed an automotive protocol to facilitate increased availability of the Pandora service in automobiles. Through the automotive protocol, certain automobile manufacturers, their suppliers and makers of aftermarket audio systems can easily connect dash-mounted interface elements to the Pandora app running on a smartphone. This allows us to deliver the Pandora service to listeners via their existing smartphone, while leveraging the automobile itself for application command, display and control functionalities.
Pandora API. As part of our effort to make the Pandora service available everywhere our listeners want it, we have developed an application programming interface, which we call the Pandora API. Through our partnerships with manufacturers of consumer electronics products, we have used this technology to bring the Pandora experience to connected devices throughout the home.
Tv.pandora.com. We have developed a standards-based HTML5 website called tv.pandora.com that allows users to stream music content on next generation TV, game consoles and set top box architectures that support open web standards. Tv.pandora.com features streamlined navigation with controls and displays designed specifically for larger screens.
Distribution and Partnerships
A key element of our strategy is to make the Pandora service available everywhere that there is internet connectivity. To this end, we make the Pandora service available through a variety of distribution channels. In addition to streaming our service to computers, we have developed Pandora mobile device applications or “apps” for smartphones such as iPhone, phones running the Android operating system, the Windows Phone and for tablets including the iPad and tablets running the Android operating system. We distribute those mobile apps free to listeners via app stores.
Pandora is now integrated with more than 1,000 connected devices, including automobiles, automotive aftermarket devices and consumer electronic devices. Currently, most automobile integrations rely on smartphones for internet connectivity, which has enabled Pandora to be available in the ten best-selling passenger vehicles in the United States. Some automobiles are now using built-in modems to deliver internet connectivity that powers the Pandora experience, which we call a native integration. These native automotive integrations allow drivers to control the service via in-dash entertainment systems. As of
4
December 31, 2014, more than 9 million unique users have activated Pandora through a native automotive integration in 26 major automobile brands and 8 automotive aftermarket manufacturers. We view the integration of the Pandora service into automobiles as key area of potential growth for the service, as a large portion of terrestrial radio listening occurs in automobiles.
Advertising Revenue
We derive the substantial majority of our revenue from the sale of audio, display and video advertising for delivery across our computer, mobile and other connected device platforms. We generate the majority of our revenue from mobile and other connected devices, which presents an opportunity for us to reach our audience anytime, anywhere that they enjoy music and therefore offer additional distribution channels to current and potential advertisers for delivery of their advertising messages.
Our advertising strategy focuses on developing our core suite of audio, display and video advertising products and marketing these products to advertisers for delivery across computer and mobile and other connected device platforms. Our advertising products allow both local and national advertisers to target and connect with listeners based on attributes including age, gender, zip code and content preferences using multi-platform ad campaigns to target their advertising messages to listeners anytime and anywhere. As listenership on our mobile platforms has grown more rapidly than on our other platforms, we have sought to improve our mobile advertising products to better enable us to market multi-platform advertising solutions. In the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, advertising revenue accounted for approximately 88%, 88%, 82% and 80% of our total revenue, respectively, and we expect that advertising will comprise a substantial majority of revenue for the foreseeable future.
Audio Advertising. Our audio advertising products allow custom audio messages to be delivered between songs during short ad interludes. Audio ads are available across all of our delivery platforms. On supported platforms, the audio ads can be accompanied by display ads to further enhance advertisers' messages.
Display Advertising. Our display advertising products offer opportunities to maximize exposure to our listeners through our desktop and mobile service graphical interfaces, which are divided between our tuner containing our player and "now playing" information, and the information space surrounding our tuner. Our display ads include industry standard banner ads of various sizes and placements depending on platform and listener interaction.
Video Advertising. Our video advertising products allow delivery of rich branded messages to further engage listeners through in-banner click-initiated videos, videos that automatically play when a listener changes stations or skips a song and opt-in videos that pause the music and cover the tuner.
Native Advertising. Our audio, display and video advertising products can be designed and modified by us and advertisers to tailor advertising campaigns to fit specific advertiser needs. Our advertisers can create custom "branded" stations from our music library that can be accessed by our listeners, as well as engage listeners by allowing them to personalize the branded stations through listener-controlled variables. In addition to branded stations, we offer advertisers our sponsored listening product, in which advertisers sponsor ad-free listening for consumers in exchange for the consumer’s active brand interaction, such as watching a video advertisement, interacting with rich media or visiting the advertiser's landing page.
Additionally, advertisers can also benefit from our proprietary ad targeting capabilities. Our proprietary targeting segments leverage listener-submitted profile information, enabling advertisers to precisely reach sought-after consumers across the web and connected devices without needing third-party cookies.
In 2013, we integrated Pandora's advertising inventory into the leading radio media buying platforms, Mediaocean and STRATA, and we are continuing to enhance the ability of radio advertisers to purchase media on these platforms which incorporate Triton measurements of our radio audience reach side-by-side with terrestrial radio metrics.
In January 2014, we introduced in-car advertising solutions, offering advertisers the opportunity to reach in-car audiences through audio ads running on vehicle models and aftermarket automotive devices with native Pandora automotive integrations.
In addition, we have invested in building a local advertising sales force in major radio markets. As of December 31, 2014, we have 111 local sellers in 37 markets in the United States and we intend to continue investing to extend our local market presence for the foreseeable future.
5
Our integration into standard radio media-buying processes and measurement, our in-car advertising solutions and our local advertising sales force are key elements of our strategy to expand our penetration of the radio advertising market. Our success in executing this strategy is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in “Risk Factors.”
Subscription and Other Revenue
Subscription and other revenue is generated primarily through the sale of Pandora One, a premium version of the Pandora service, which currently includes advertisement-free access and higher audio quality on the devices that support it. Pandora One is primarily available for purchase through major app stores and through the Pandora website. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, subscription and other revenue accounted for 12%, 12%, 18% and 20% of our total revenue, respectively.
Content, Copyrights and Royalties
To secure the rights to stream music content over the internet, we must obtain licenses from, and pay royalties to, copyright owners, or their agents, for the sound recordings that we perform, as well as the musical works embodied in each of those sound recordings, subject to certain exclusions. These licensing and royalty arrangements strongly influence our business operations. We stream spoken word comedy content pursuant to a federal statutory license, as described under the section captioned "Sound Recordings" below, which in some instances we have opted to augment with direct agreements with the licensors of such sound recordings. For spoken word comedy, the underlying literary works are not currently entitled to eligibility for licensing by any performing rights organization ("PRO") for the United States. Rather, pursuant to industry-wide custom and practice, this content is performed absent a specific license from any such PRO or the copyright owner of such content.
Sound Recordings
The number of sound recordings we transmit to users of the Pandora service, as generally reflected by our listener hours, drives the vast majority of our content acquisition costs. We obtain performance rights licenses and pay performance rights royalties for the benefit of the copyright owners of such sound recordings and the recording artists, both featured and non-featured, on such recordings, mainly pursuant to the Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 (the "DPRA") and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (the "DMCA"). Under federal statutory licenses created by the DPRA and the DMCA, we are permitted to stream any lawfully released sound recordings and to make reproductions of these recordings on our computer servers, without having to separately negotiate and obtain direct licenses with each individual sound recording copyright owner. These statutory licenses are granted to us on the condition that we operate in compliance with the rules of the statutory licenses and pay the applicable royalty rates to SoundExchange, the non-profit organization designated by the Copyright Royalty Board (the “CRB”), a tribunal established within the U.S. Library of Congress, to collect and distribute royalties under these statutory licenses.
The rates we pay pursuant to the federal statutory licenses can be established by either negotiation or through a rate proceeding conducted by the CRB. In 2009, certain webcasters reached a settlement agreement with SoundExchange establishing alternative rates and rate structures to those eventually established by the CRB for services not qualifying for the settlement rates. This settlement agreement is commonly known as the "Pureplay Settlement" that applies through the end of 2015. We have elected since 2009 to avail ourselves of the Pureplay Settlement. Proceedings to establish rates that will be applicable to our service for the 2016-2020 period, known as the Webcasting IV proceedings, were commenced in January 2014. There can be no assurances that the Webcasting IV proceedings will not result in significantly higher royalties than we currently pay. Further, federal copyright law does not recognize a public performance right for sound recordings created prior to February 15, 1972, and we face additional risks related to pre-1972 sound recording licensing. For additional details on risks related to the rate-setting process and pre-1972 sound recordings, please refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors.”
The royalties we pay to SoundExchange for the streaming of sound recordings are calculated using a per performance rate and are subject to audit. The table below sets forth the per performance rates for the calendar years 2014 to 2015 as (i) established by the CRB, which we have opted not to pay, (ii) under the Pureplay Settlement applicable to our non-subscription, ad-supported service and (iii) under the Pureplay Settlement applicable to our subscription service:
6
Pureplay Rate | Pureplay Rate | |||||||||
Year | CRB Rate | (non-subscription)* | (subscription) | |||||||
2014 | $ | 0.00230 | $ | 0.00130 | $ | 0.00230 | ||||
2015 | $ | 0.00230 | $ | 0.00140 | $ | 0.00250 | ||||
* The rate applicable to our non-subscription service is the greater of the per performance rates set forth in this column or 25% of all of our U.S. gross revenue, including revenue from subscriptions. | ||||||||||
As reflected in the table above, we pay per-performance rates for streaming of sound recordings via our Pandora One subscription service that are higher than the per-performance rates for our free, non-subscription service. As a result, we may incur higher royalty expenses to SoundExchange for a listener that subscribes to Pandora One as compared to a listener that uses our free, non-subscription service, even if both listeners listen to the same number of performances.
In addition to our federal statutory licenses for sound recording rights under the DPRA and DMCA, Pandora has recently negotiated direct licenses with labels for such rights. In August 2014, we announced an agreement to partner with Music and Entertainment Rights Licensing Independent Network ("Merlin"), the global rights agency for the independent label sector. This partnership is designed to help independent labels and artists increase the audiences they reach. Participating labels, and the artists they represent, can also take advantage of the marketing capabilities of our connected platform by obtaining direct access to our metadata to help make data-driven business decisions. We do not expect this partnership to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or operating results.
Musical Works
Our content costs are also comprised of the royalties we pay for the public performance of musical works embodied in the sound recordings that we stream. Copyright owners of musical works, typically, songwriters and music publishers, have traditionally relied on PROs to negotiate so-called "blanket" licenses with copyright users, collect royalties under such licenses, and distribute them to copyright owners. We have obtained public performance licenses from, and pay license fees to, the three major PROs in the United States: the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”), Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) and SESAC, Inc. (“SESAC”).
ASCAP and BMI each are governed by a consent decree with the United States Department of Justice. The rates we pay ASCAP and BMI can be established by either negotiation or through a rate court proceeding conducted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. We elected to terminate our prior agreements with ASCAP as of December 31, 2010 and with BMI as of December 31, 2012 because, among other things, we believed that the royalty rates sought by ASCAP and BMI were in excess of rates paid by our largest radio competitors, broadcast radio stations and satellite radio. Notwithstanding our termination of these agreements, the musical works administered by each of ASCAP and BMI continued to be licensed to us pursuant to the provisions of their respective consent decrees. In November 2012, we filed a petition requesting that the ASCAP rate court determine reasonable license fees and terms for the ASCAP consent decree license applicable to the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. In June 2013, BMI filed a petition requesting that the BMI rate court determine reasonable license fees and terms for the BMI consent decree license applicable to the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017. A trial to determine the royalty rates we will pay ASCAP concluded in February 2014 and the court issued its opinion establishing final fees in March 2014, but ASCAP has appealed the decision and such appeal is pending. The BMI rate court proceeding commenced on February 10, 2015. Pending the Court’s determination of final fees for Pandora’s BMI license, Pandora is operating under an interim license with BMI. For additional details regarding such proceedings, please see the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Legal Proceedings.”
We currently operate under an agreement with SESAC, which automatically renews yearly, but is subject to termination by either party in accordance with its terms at the end of each yearly term. The SESAC rate is subject to small annual increases.
In some cases, we pay royalties directly to music publishers. Music publishers own or administer copyrights in musical works and license those copyrights to third parties that use music, such as record labels, filmmakers, television and radio stations. Publishers also collect license fees from these third parties and distribute the fees to the writers or composers of the musical works. Between 2012 and 2014, certain publishers purported to partially withdraw portions of their repertoires from each of ASCAP and BMI with the intent that each performing rights organization would be unable to license the withdrawn musical works to new media licensees such as Pandora. Our position is that attempted partial withdrawals violate the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees. However, from time to time, we have entered, and will continue to enter, into agreements with some purported withdrawing publishers to enable Pandora to continue to perform those publishers’ works amidst the current legal uncertainty. For additional details regarding such purported withdrawals, please see the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and
7
“Legal Proceedings.”
In July 2014, we signed a multi-year agreement with BMG Rights Management US LLC (“BMG”) for a U.S. license for BMG's complete catalogs of musical works. We do not expect this agreement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or operating results.
In June 2013, we entered into a local marketing agreement to program KXMZ-FM, a Rapid City, South Dakota-area terrestrial radio station. In addition, we entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of KXMZ-FM for a total purchase price of approximately $0.6 million in cash, subject to certain closing conditions. These agreements were made in part to allow us to qualify for certain settlement agreements concerning royalties for the public performance of musical works between the Radio Music Licensing Committee (“RMLC”) and ASCAP and BMI. We believe that we qualify for the RMLC royalty rates, which have provided and will continue to provide us with savings of less than 1% of revenue in cost of revenue—content acquisition costs compared with the latest contractual rates.
As of December 31, 2014, we have paid $0.4 million of the purchase price, which is included in the other long-term assets line item of our balance sheets. Completion of the KXMZ-FM acquisition is subject to various closing conditions. These include, but are not limited to, regulatory approval by the Federal Communications Commission.
Non-U.S. Licensing Regimes
In addition to the copyright and licensing arrangements described above for our use of sound recordings and musical compositions in the United States, other countries have various copyright and licensing regimes, including in some cases performing rights organizations and copyright collection societies from which licenses must be obtained. We have obtained licenses to operate in Australia and New Zealand for the communication of sound recordings and the musical compositions embodied in those sound recordings, which have not had a material effect on our results of operations to date.
Government Regulation
As a company conducting business on the internet, we are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and regulations relating to consumer protection, information security and data protection, among other things. Many of these laws and regulations are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. In the area of information security and data protection, the laws in several states require companies to implement specific information security controls to protect certain types of information. Likewise, all but a few states have laws in place requiring companies to notify users if there is a security breach that compromises certain categories of their information. We are also subject to federal and state laws regarding privacy of listener data, among other things. Our privacy policy and terms of use describe our practices concerning the use, transmission and disclosure of listener information and are posted on our website.
Sales and Marketing
We organize our sales force into multiple geographically-based teams that are each focused on selling advertising across our computer, mobile and other connected device platforms. Teams are located in our Oakland, California headquarters, in regional sales offices in Chicago, New York and Santa Monica and local sales offices throughout the United States, in Sydney, Australia and in Auckland, New Zealand.
Our marketing team is charged with amplifying Pandora's brand message to grow awareness and drive listener hours. We organize the marketing team into three groups focused on communications, marketing analytics and brand marketing. While we have historically relied on the success of viral marketing to expand consumer awareness of our service, in 2014 we began to launch marketing campaigns to increase consumer awareness and expand our listener base. We anticipate that we will continue to utilize these types of marketing campaigns in the future.
Artist Relations
Pandora Artist Marketing Platform ("Pandora AMP"). In October 2014, we launched Pandora AMP, a free online service that gives artists and their managers a detailed view of their audience on our service. Pandora AMP provides data and insights to the more than 125,000 artists played on our service. Derived from tens of billions of hours of personalized listening, Pandora AMP is designed to help artists with many critical decisions such as tour routing, single selection, set lists, audience targeting and more.
Music Industry Group. In October 2014, to consolidate all of our music industry initiatives into a single product suite,
8
and to help drive connections with fans across all channels at Pandora, we brought the teams across the business that work most directly with the music industry together into a single group known as the Music Industry Group. Our vision is to ensure artists can promote and market their music to fans, drive engagement with experiences from live events to original content and understand all of the benefits of these interactions via our analytics tools.
Competition
Competition for Listeners
We compete for the time and attention of our listeners with other content providers on the basis of a number of factors, including quality of experience, relevance, acceptance and perception of content quality, ease of use, price, accessibility, perceptions of ad load, brand awareness and reputation. We also compete for listeners on the basis of our presence, branding and visibility as compared with other providers that deliver content through the internet, mobile devices and consumer products. We believe that we compete favorably on these factors. For additional details on risks related to competition for listeners, please refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors."
Many of our current and potential future competitors enjoy competitive advantages, such as greater name recognition, legacy operating histories and larger marketing budgets, as well as greater financial, technical and other resources. We compete with many forms of media for the time and attention of our listeners, such as Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, Pinterest and Instagram. Our direct competitors, however, include iHeartRadio, iTunes Radio, LastFM, Google Songza and other companies in the traditional broadcast and internet radio market. We also directly compete with the non-interactive, Internet radio offerings from providers such as Spotify and Slacker.
We compete for listeners with broadcast radio providers, including terrestrial radio providers. Many broadcast radio companies own large numbers of radio stations or other media properties. Many terrestrial radio stations have begun broadcasting digital signals, which provide high quality audio transmission. In addition, unlike participants in the emerging internet radio market, terrestrial and satellite radio providers, as aggregate entities of their subsidiary providers, generally enjoy larger established audiences and legacy operating histories. Broadcast and satellite radio companies enjoy a significant cost advantage because they pay a much lower percentage of revenue for transmissions of sound recordings. Broadcast radio pays no royalties for its terrestrial use of sound recordings, and satellite radio paid only 9.5% of revenue in 2014 and only 10% of revenue in 2015 for its satellite transmissions of sound recordings. By contrast, Pandora incurred content acquisition costs representing 44% of revenue for our internet transmissions of sound recordings during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. We also compete directly with other emerging non-interactive internet radio providers, which may offer more extensive content libraries than we offer and some of which may be accessed internationally. We could face additional competition if known incumbents in the digital media space choose to enter the internet radio market.
We face competition from providers of interactive on-demand audio content and pre-recorded entertainment that allow listeners to select the audio content that they stream or purchase. This interactive on-demand content is accessible in automobiles and homes, using portable players, mobile phones and other wireless and consumer electronic devices. The audio entertainment marketplace continues to rapidly evolve, providing our listeners with a growing number of alternatives and new media platforms.
We compete for the time and attention of our listeners with providers of other forms of in-home and mobile entertainment. To the extent existing or potential listeners choose to watch cable television, stream video from on-demand services or play interactive video games on their home-entertainment system, computer or mobile phone rather than listen to the Pandora service, these content services pose a competitive threat.
Competition for Advertisers
We compete with other content providers for a share of our advertising customers' overall marketing budgets. We compete on the basis of a number of factors, including perceived return on investment, effectiveness and relevance of our advertising products, pricing structure and ability to deliver large volumes or precise types of ads to targeted demographics. We believe that our ability to deliver targeted and relevant ads across a wide range of platforms allows us to compete favorably on the basis of these factors and justify a long-term profitable pricing structure. However, the market for online advertising solutions is intensely competitive and rapidly changing, and with the introduction of new technologies and market entrants, we expect competition to intensify in the future. Our competitors include Facebook, Google, MSN, Yahoo!, ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. We directly compete against iHeartRadio, Entercom, Cumulus and other companies of the traditional broadcast radio market. For additional details on risks related to competition for advertisers, please refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors."
9
The market for online advertising is becoming increasingly competitive as advertisers are allocating increasing amounts of their overall marketing budgets to online advertising. We compete for online advertisers with other internet companies, including major internet portals, search engine companies and social media sites. Large internet companies with greater brand recognition have significant numbers of direct sales personnel, more advanced programmatic advertising capabilities and substantial proprietary advertising inventory and web traffic that provide a significant competitive advantage and have a significant impact on pricing for internet advertising and web traffic.
Terrestrial broadcast, and to a lesser extent satellite radio, are significant sources of competition for advertising dollars. These radio providers deliver ads across platforms that are more familiar to traditional advertisers than the internet might be.
We compete for advertising dollars with other traditional media companies in television and print. These traditional outlets present us with a number of competitive challenges in attracting advertisers, including large established audiences, longer operating histories, greater brand recognition and a growing presence on the internet.
Seasonality
Our results reflect the effects of seasonal trends in listener and advertising behavior. We expect to experience both higher advertising sales due to greater advertiser demand during the holiday season and increased usage due to the popularity of holiday music during the last three months of each calendar year. In addition, we expect to experience lower advertising sales in the first three months of each calendar year due to reduced advertiser demand and increased usage due to increased use of media-streaming devices received as gifts during the holiday season. See the section entitled "Business Trends" in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of the seasonality of our financial results.
We changed our fiscal year to the calendar twelve months ended December 31 to align with the advertising industry’s business cycle, effective beginning with the period ended on December 31, 2013. The results of our fiscal quarters prior to 2014 (three months ended April 30, July 31, October 31 and January 31 of each year) reflect the same effects of the seasonal trends on advertising revenue discussed above for calendar periods, except that the impact of these advertising sales-related trends on our fiscal results was not as pronounced due to the inclusion of January instead of October in our fourth fiscal quarter.
Intellectual Property
Our success depends in part upon our ability to protect our technologies and intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including trade secrets, patents, copyrights, trademarks, contractual restrictions, technological measures and other methods. We enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants and business partners, and we control access to and distribution of our proprietary information.
We have 11 patents that have been issued in the United States and 11 that have been issued outside of the United States, and we continue to pursue additional patent protection, both in the United States and abroad where appropriate and cost effective. In December 2014, we purchased certain patents covering technologies used in internet radio from Allied Security Trust. In June 2013, we purchased certain patents covering technologies used in internet radio from Yahoo! Inc. for $8.0 million in cash. We intend to hold these patents purchased from Allied Security Trust and Yahoo! Inc. as part of our strategy to protect and defend Pandora in patent-related litigation.
Our registered trademarks in the United States include "Pandora" and the "Music Genome Project," in addition to a number of Pandora logos and other Pandora marks. "Pandora" is also registered in Australia, Canada, Chile, the European Union, India, Israel, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Switzerland, Taiwan and other countries. "Music Genome Project" is also registered in Australia, Canada, China and New Zealand. We have pending trademark applications in the United States and other countries for Pandora names and marks.
We are the registrant of the internet domain name for our website, pandora.com, as well as pandora.eu, pandora.fm, pandora.co.in, pandora.co.uk, pandora.uk, pandora.co.nz, pandora.de, pandora.tw, and pandora.rocks, among others. We own rights to proprietary processes and trade secrets, including those underlying the Pandora service.
In addition to the foregoing protections, we generally control access to and use of our proprietary software and other confidential information through the use of internal and external controls, including contractual protections with employees, contractors, customers and partners.
10
Customer Concentration
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we had no customers that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue.
Employees
As of December 31, 2014, we had 1,414 employees. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Corporate and Available Information
We were incorporated as a California corporation in January 2000 and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in December 2010. Our principal executive offices are located at 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1650, Oakland, California 94612 and our telephone number is (510) 451-4100. Our website is located at www.pandora.com and our Investor Relations website is located at investor.pandora.com.
We changed our fiscal year to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the period ended on December 31, 2013. As a result, our prior fiscal year was shortened from twelve months to an eleven-month transition period ended December 31, 2013. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, all references to a fiscal year prior to December 31, 2013 refer to the twelve months ended January 31 of such year, and references to the first, second, third and fourth fiscal quarters ended prior to November 1, 2013 refer to the three months ended April 30, July 31, October 31 and January 31, respectively.
We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including Annual and Transition Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any other filings required by the SEC. We make available on our Investor Relations website, free of charge, our Annual and Transition Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document we file with the SEC.
The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
11
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risks and uncertainties set forth below, as well as other factors described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in other filings by us with the SEC, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that are not currently believed by us to be material may also harm our business operations and financial results. Because of the following factors, as well as other factors affecting our financial condition and operating results, past financial performance should not be considered to be a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.
Risks Related to Our Business
We operate under and pay royalties pursuant to statutory and third-party licenses for the reproduction and public performance of sound recordings that could change or cease to exist, which would adversely affect our business.
We currently operate under statutory and third-party licenses that may change or cease to exist. We must pay performance rights royalties for the digital audio transmission of sound recordings. Subject to our ongoing compliance with numerous statutory conditions and regulatory requirements for a non-interactive service, we are permitted to operate our radio service under federal statutory licenses that allow the streaming in the U.S. of any sound recording lawfully released to the public. Pandora offers a small number of ancillary services (e.g., “Pandora Premieres”) that allows users to more directly engage with a limited amount of content for which we secure rights directly from copyright owners. We are also permitted to make reproductions of sound recordings on computer servers pursuant to these statutory licenses designed to facilitate the making of transmissions. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 we incurred SoundExchange related content acquisition costs representing 44% of our total revenue for that period.
There is no guarantee that Congress will not amend the Copyright Act to eliminate the availability of these licenses or that we will continue to be eligible to operate under these statutory licenses. For example, if copyright owners objected, and a court agreed, that we operate an "interactive" streaming service, that we make reproductions of sound recordings not covered by the statutory license, or that the functionality or transmission methods of our service extend beyond what is allowed under the statutory license, we could be subject to significant liability for copyright infringement and, absent making technological changes, lose our eligibility to operate under the statutory license. In that event, we would have to negotiate license agreements with sound recording copyright owners individually, a time-consuming and expensive undertaking that could jeopardize our ability to stream a significant percentage of the music currently in our library and result in royalty costs that are prohibitively expensive.
As described in "Business—Content, Copyrights and Royalties—Sound Recordings", we currently elect to avail ourselves of the Pureplay Settlement, which provides the rates and terms of statutory licenses for the reproduction and public performance of sound recordings for commercial webcasters through 2015, and we intend to continue to avail ourselves of this settlement through 2015. We presently do not know what rates will be available to us commencing January 1, 2016. There can be no assurance that we will be able to reach a new agreement with SoundExchange for commercially reasonable rates. The CRB, which has rate-making authority over us upon expiration of the Pureplay Settlement, has consistently established royalty rates, including those established for the years 2011 through 2015 that would, if paid by us, consume a significantly greater portion of our revenue and negatively impact our ability to achieve and sustain profitability. There can be no assurance that the per performance rates established by the CRB for periods following 2015 will not exceed the rates currently paid by us under the Pureplay Settlement. If we are unable to reach a new agreement for commercially reasonable rates with SoundExchange and the CRB sets performance rates for post-2015 periods that exceed the Pureplay Settlement, our content acquisition costs may significantly increase, which could materially harm our financial condition and inhibit the implementation of our business plans.
Outside the statutory framework, we have entered into a partnership with Merlin, the global rights agency for the independent label sector, pursuant to which we directly negotiated performance royalties for sound recordings with Merlin and its members. There is no guarantee that any licenses we directly negotiate would continue to be available to us in the future or that such licenses would be available at the royalty rates initially established.
We depend upon third-party licenses for the right to publicly perform musical works and a change to these licenses could materially increase our content acquisition costs.
Our content costs, in part, are comprised of the royalties we pay for the public performance of musical works embodied in the sound recordings that we stream. As described in “Business—Content, Copyrights and Royalties—Musical Works”, to
12
secure the rights to publicly perform musical works embodied in sound recordings over the internet, we obtain licenses from or for the benefit of copyright owners and pay royalties to copyright owners or their agents. Copyright owners of musical works are vigilant in protecting their rights and currently are seeking substantial increases in the rates applicable to the public performance of such works. There is no guarantee that the licenses available to us now will continue to be available in the future or that such licenses will be available at the royalty rates associated with the current licenses. If we are unable to secure and maintain rights to publicly perform musical works or if we cannot do so on terms that are acceptable to us, our ability to perform music content to our listeners, and consequently our ability to attract and retain both listeners and advertisers, will be adversely impacted. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we incurred content acquisition costs for the public performance of musical works representing approximately 4% of our total revenue for that period.
We currently operate under a license with ASCAP and an interim license with BMI. ASCAP and BMI each are governed by a consent decree with the United States Department of Justice. The rates we pay ASCAP and BMI can be established by either negotiation or through a rate court proceeding conducted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. We elected to terminate our prior agreements with ASCAP as of December 31, 2010 and with BMI as of December 31, 2012 because, among other things, we believed that the royalty rates sought by ASCAP and BMI were in excess of rates paid by our largest radio competitors, broadcast radio stations and satellite radio. Notwithstanding our termination of these agreements, the musical works administered by each of ASCAP and BMI continued to be licensed to us pursuant to the provisions of their respective consent decrees. In November 2012, we filed a petition requesting that the ASCAP rate court determine reasonable license fees and terms for the ASCAP consent decree license applicable to the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. In June 2013, BMI filed a petition requesting that the BMI rate court determine reasonable license fees and terms for the BMI consent decree license applicable to the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017. A trial to determine the royalty rates we will pay ASCAP concluded in February 2014 and the court issued its opinion establishing final fees in March 2014, but ASCAP has appealed the decision and such appeal is pending. The BMI rate court proceeding commenced in February 2015. Pending the Court’s determination of final fees for Pandora’s BMI license, Pandora is operating under an interim license with BMI. For additional details regarding such proceedings, please see the section entitled “Legal Proceedings.” Each of these proceedings has been, and is expected to continue to be, protracted, expensive and uncertain in outcome. It is likely that trial level outcomes will be appealed and the final resolution may not be known for years. In the event that these matters are resolved adversely to us, our content acquisition costs could increase significantly, which would adversely affect our operating results. Notwithstanding the ASCAP court decision, there is no guarantee that final rates established by mutual agreement or by a rate court determination would establish royalty rates more favorable to us than those we previously paid pursuant to our terminated agreements with ASCAP and/or BMI or those that we pay pursuant to our interim arrangements with ASCAP and/or BMI.
We also currently operate under an agreement with SESAC, which automatically renews yearly, but is subject to termination by either party in accordance with its terms at the end of each yearly term. The SESAC rate is subject to small annual increases. There is no guarantee that either the license or the associated royalty rate available to us now with respect to SESAC will be available to us in the future.
In certain cases, we have also directly negotiated royalty agreements with publishers. There is no guarantee that any directly negotiated licenses with publishers available to us now will continue to be available in the future or that such licenses will be available at the royalty rates associated with such licenses.
We do not currently pay so-called “mechanical royalties” to music publishers for the reproduction and distribution of musical works embodied in server copies or transitory copies used to make streams audible to our listeners. Although not currently a matter of dispute, if music publishers were to retreat from the publicly stated position of their trade association that non-interactive streaming does not require the payment of a mechanical royalties, and a court entered final judgment requiring that payment, our royalty obligations could increase significantly, which would increase our operating expenses and harm our business and financial conditions. While we would vigorously challenge such mechanical royalties as not required by law, our challenge may be unsuccessful and would in any case involve commitment of substantial time and resources. In addition, we stream spoken word comedy content, for which the underlying literary works are not currently entitled to eligibility for licensing by any performing rights organization in the United States. Rather, pursuant to industry-wide custom and practice, this content is performed absent a specific license from any such performing rights organization or individual rights owners, although royalties are paid to SoundExchange for the public performance of the sound recordings in which such literary works are embodied. There can be no assurance that this industry custom will not change or that we will not otherwise become subject to additional licensing costs for spoken word comedy content imposed by performing rights organizations or individual copyright owners in the future or be subject to damages for copyright infringement.
13
Changes in third-party licenses for the right to publicly perform musical works may reduce the sound recordings that we perform on the service or materially increase our content acquisition costs.
The number of works administered by SESAC, ASCAP and BMI may fluctuate over time and may be subject to the withdrawal of certain rights by individual SESAC, ASCAP and BMI-affiliated music publishers for certain types of transmissions by certain types of services, such as Pandora, or the loss of repertory entirely in the event of a publisher’s complete withdrawal from any of SESAC, ASCAP or BMI. The decrease in the works licensed by SESAC, ASCAP and BMI may require more direct licensing by Pandora with individual music publishers and individual publishers not subject to a mandatory licensing obligations who could withhold the rights to all of the musical works which they own or administer. Between 2012 and 2014, certain publishers purported to partially withdraw portions of their repertoires from each of ASCAP and BMI with the intent that each performing rights organization would be unable to license the withdrawn musical works to new media licensees such as Pandora. Our position is that these attempted partial withdrawals were a violation of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, and we moved for summary judgment in both the ASCAP and BMI rate courts to clarify the issue.
The ASCAP rate court granted our summary motion in September 2013, which is subject to appeal, determining that the publishers’ attempted partial withdrawals from ASCAP would place ASCAP in violation of its consent decree and, therefore, were ineffectual. The BMI rate court agreed that the attempted partial withdrawals would place BMI in violation of its consent decree; however, it also determined that any publisher seeking to partially withdraw from BMI would be deemed to have totally withdrawn from BMI. Based on the ASCAP court decision, we believe that Pandora remains able to perform works that were the subject of such attempted partial withdrawals. Based on the BMI court decision, however, there is some doubt regarding our ability under the BMI license to perform works that have been the subject of attempted partial publisher withdrawals. From time to time, in light of the legal uncertainties, we have entered into agreements with some purported withdrawing publishers to enable Pandora to continue to perform those publishers’ works while we continue to pursue other legal remedies.
If music publishers effectuate withdrawals of all or a portion of their catalogs from ASCAP, BMI or SESAC, we may no longer be able to obtain licenses for such publisher’s withdrawn catalogs from ASCAP, BMI or SESAC. Under these circumstances, we would either need to enter into direct licensing arrangements with such music publishers or remove those musical works from the service, including any sound recordings in which such musical works are embodied. Although we continue to be licensed by the performing rights organizations, it is unclear what specific effect a publisher's purported limited or prospective complete withdrawal of rights to public performances by means of digital transmissions from a performing rights organization would have on us. If we are unable to reach an agreement with respect to the repertoire of any music publisher which successfully withdraws all or a portion of its catalog(s) from a performing rights organization, or if we are forced to enter into direct licensing agreements with such publishers at rates higher than those currently set by the performing rights organizations, or higher than those set by the U.S. District Court having supervisory authority over ASCAP and BMI, for the performance of musical works, or if there is uncertainty as to what rights are administered by any particular performing rights organization or publisher, the number of sound recordings that we perform on our service may be reduced, our content acquisition costs may increase and our ability to retain and expand our listener base could be adversely affected, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our inability to obtain accurate and comprehensive information to identify the ownership of a musical work may impact our ability to remove musical works or decrease the number of performances of a particular musical work, subjecting us to potential copyright infringement and difficulties in controlling content acquisition costs.
Comprehensive and accurate rightsholder information for the musical works that we publicly perform is not presently available to us. Without the ability to identify which composers, songwriters or publishers own or administer musical works, and an ability to determine which musical works correspond to specific sound recordings, it may be difficult to remove from our service musical works for which we have not obtained a license, which may subject us to significant liability for copyright infringement.
In addition, we have historically relied on the provisions of blanket licenses from ASCAP and BMI pursuant to certain consent decrees, and if the consent decrees no longer provide for such blanket licenses, our lack of ownership information for the musical works we stream may make it difficult to identify the appropriate rightsholders from which to obtain a license, which could also lead to a reduction of musical works performed on our service, adversely impacting our ability to retain and expand our listener base.
Internet radio is an evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects.
Internet radio continues to develop as an industry and our current business and future prospects are difficult to evaluate. The marketplace for internet radio has undergone rapid and dramatic changes in its relatively short history and is subject to
14
significant challenges. As a result, the future revenue, income and growth potential of our business is uncertain. Investors should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we encounter in this rapidly evolving business, which risks and difficulties include, among others:
•our relatively new, evolving and unproven business model;
•our ability to retain our current listenership, build our listener base and increase listener hours;
•our ability to effectively monetize listener hours, particularly with respect to listener hours on mobile devices, by growing our sales of advertising inventory created from growing listener hours and developing compelling ad product solutions that successfully deliver advertisers' messages across the range of our delivery platforms while maintaining our listener experience in continually evolving industries;
•our ability to attract new advertisers, retain existing advertisers and prove to advertisers that our advertising platform is effective enough to justify a pricing structure that is profitable for us;
•our ability to maintain relationships with makers of mobile devices, consumer electronic products and automobiles;
•our operation under an evolving music industry licensing structure including statutory and consent decree licenses that may change or cease to exist, which in turn may result in a significant increase in our operating expenses; and
•our ability to continue to secure the rights to music that attracts listeners to the service on fair and reasonable economic terms.
Failure to successfully address these risks and difficulties and other challenges associated with operating in an evolving marketplace, could inhibit the implementation of our business plan, significantly harm our financial condition, operating results and liquidity and prevent us from achieving or sustaining profitability.
Advertising on mobile devices, such as smartphones, is an emerging phenomenon, and if we are unable to increase revenue from our advertising products delivered to mobile devices, our results of operations will be materially adversely affected.
Our number of listener hours on mobile devices has surpassed listener hours on computers, and we expect that this trend will continue. Our mobile listenership has experienced significant growth since we introduced the first mobile version of our service in May 2007. Listener hours on mobile and other connected devices constituted approximately 77%, 76%, 80% and 83% of our total listener hours for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, respectively. Digital advertising on mobile devices is an emerging phenomenon, and the percentage of advertising spending allocated to digital advertising on mobile devices has historically been lower than that allocated to traditional online advertising. According to eMarketer, the percentage of U.S. advertising spending allocated to advertising on mobile devices was approximately 11% in 2014, compared to approximately 30% for all online advertising. We must therefore convince advertisers of the capabilities of mobile digital advertising opportunities so that they migrate their advertising spend toward demographics and ad solutions that more effectively utilize mobile inventory.
We are still at an early stage of building our sales capability to penetrate local advertising markets, which we view as a key challenge in monetizing our listener hours, including listener hours on mobile and other connected devices. In addition, while a substantial amount of our revenue has traditionally been derived from display ads, some display ads may not be currently optimized for use on certain mobile or other connected devices. For example, standard display ads may not be well-suited for use on smartphones due to the size of the device screen and may not be appropriate for smartphones connected to or integrated in automobiles due to safety considerations. Further, some display ads may not be optimized to take advantage of the multimedia capabilities of connected devices. Our audio and video advertising products are relatively new and have not been as widely accepted by advertisers as our traditional display ads. In addition, the introduction of audio advertising places us in more direct competition with terrestrial radio, as many advertisers that purchase audio ads focus their spending on terrestrial radio stations who traditionally have strong connections with local advertisers.
We have plans that, if successfully implemented, would increase our number of listener hours on mobile and other connected devices, including efforts to expand the reach of our service by making it available on an increasing number of devices, such as smartphones and devices connected to or installed in automobiles. In order to effectively monetize such increased listener hours, we must, among other things, convince advertisers to migrate spending to nascent advertising markets, penetrate local advertising markets and develop compelling ad product solutions. We cannot guarantee you that we will be able
15
to effectively monetize inventory generated by listeners using mobile and connected devices, or the time frame on which we may do so.
Advertising spending is increasingly being placed through new data-driven channels, such as the programmatic buying ecosystem, where mobile offerings are not as mature as their web-based equivalents. Because a large percentage of listeners use our service via mobile devices, our growth prospects and revenue may be adversely impacted if the advertising ecosystem is slow to adopt data-driven mobile advertising offerings.
As new advertising channels, such as programmatic buying, develop around data-driven technologies and advertising products, an increasing percentage of advertising spend is likely to shift to such channels and products. These data-driven advertising products and programmatic buying channels allow publishers to use data to target advertising toward specific groups of consumers who are more likely to be interested in the advertising message delivered. These advertising products and programmatic channels are currently more developed in terms of ad technology and industry adoption on the web than they are on mobile. However, the majority of our listeners currently access our service through mobile devices. Therefore, our ability to attract advertising spend, and ultimately our ad revenue, may be negatively impacted by this shift. We have no reliable way to predict how significantly or how quickly advertisers will shift buying to programmatic channels and data-driven advertising products on the web.
We are developing new data-driven, programmatic advertising capabilities for mobile, in an effort to take advantage of this trend. However, we have no reliable way to predict how significantly or how quickly advertisers will shift buying toward these data-driven ad products and programmatic channels on mobile. If advertising spend continues to be reallocated to web-based programmatic channels, and mobile programmatic adoption lags, our ability to grow revenue may be impacted and our business could be materially and adversely affected.
Emerging industry trends in digital advertising measurement and pricing may pose challenges for our ability to forecast and optimize our advertising inventory which may adversely impact our advertising revenue.
The digital advertising marketplace is currently introducing new mechanisms by which to measure and price advertising inventory. Specifically, the Media Ratings Council released the Viewable Ad Impression Measurement Guidelines in 2014 pursuant to which web display and web video advertising inventory will be transacted upon based on the number of “viewable” impressions delivered in connection with an applicable advertising campaign (instead of the number of ads served by the applicable ad server). The industry is in the early stages of this transition and we are still determining its potential impact on our inventory, operational resources, pricing, and revenue. In addition, the current measurement solutions are limited to web display and web video inventory and do not include mobile and audio inventory. Nonetheless, advertisers have been aggressively pushing to transact advertising purchases on a measured “viewable” basis. As these trends in the industry continue to evolve, our advertising revenue may be impacted by the availability, accuracy and utility of the available analytics and measurement technologies.
We have incurred significant operating losses in the past and may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to be profitable.
Since our inception in 2000, we have incurred significant net operating losses and, as of December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $197.0 million. A key element of our strategy is to increase the number of listeners and listener hours to increase our industry penetration, including the number of listener hours on mobile and other connected devices. However, as our number of listener hours increases, the royalties we pay for content acquisition also increase. In addition, we have adopted a strategy to invest in our operations in advance of, and to drive, future revenue growth. As a result of these trends, we have not in the past generated, and may not in the future generate, sufficient revenue from the sale of advertising and subscriptions to offset our expenses. In addition, we plan to continue to invest heavily in our operations to support anticipated future growth. As a result of these factors, we expect to incur annual net losses on a U.S. GAAP basis in the near term.
Our revenue increased rapidly in each of the twelve months ended January 31, 2007 through January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014; however, we do not expect to sustain our high revenue growth rates in the future as a result of a variety of factors, including increased competition and the maturation of our business, and we cannot guarantee you that our revenue will continue to grow or will not decline. Investors should not consider our historical revenue growth or operating expenses as indicative of our future performance. If revenue growth is lower than our expectations, or our operating expenses exceed our expectations, our financial performance will be adversely affected. Further, if our future growth and operating performance fail to meet investor or analyst expectations, it could have a materially negative effect on our stock price.
In addition, in our efforts to increase revenue as the number of listener hours has grown, we have expanded and expect to
16
continue to expand our sales force. If our hiring of additional sales personnel does not result in a sufficient increase in revenue, the cost of this additional headcount will not be offset, which would harm our operating results and financial condition.
Our failure to convince advertisers of the benefits of our service in the future could harm our business.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 we derived 80% of our revenue from the sale of advertising and expect to continue to derive a substantial majority of our revenue from the sale of advertising in the future. Our ability to attract and retain advertisers, and ultimately to sell our advertising inventory to generate advertising revenue, depends on a number of factors, including:
• increasing the number of listener hours, particularly within desired demographics;
• keeping pace with changes in technology and our competitors;
• competing effectively for advertising dollars from other online marketing and media companies;
• penetrating the industry for local radio advertising;
• demonstrating the value of advertisements to reach targeted audiences across all of our delivery platforms, including the value of mobile digital advertising;
• continuing to develop and diversify our advertising platform, which currently includes delivery of display, audio and video advertising products through multiple delivery channels, including computers, mobile and other connected devices; and
• coping with ad blocking technologies that have been developed and are likely to continue to be developed that can block the display of our ads.
Our agreements with advertisers are generally short-term or may be terminated at any time by the advertiser. Advertisers that are spending only a small amount of their overall advertising budget on our service may view advertising with us as experimental and unproven and may leave us for competing alternatives at any time. We may never succeed in capturing a greater share of our advertisers' core advertising spending, particularly if we are unable to achieve the scale and industry penetration necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of our advertising platforms, or if our advertising model proves ineffective or not competitive when compared to alternatives. Failure to demonstrate the value of our service would result in reduced spending by, or loss of, existing or potential future advertisers, which would materially harm our revenue and business.
If our efforts to attract prospective listeners and to retain existing listeners are not successful, our growth prospects and revenue will be adversely affected.
Our ability to grow our business and generate advertising revenue depends on retaining and expanding our listener base and increasing listener hours. We must convince prospective listeners of the benefits of our service and existing listeners of the continuing value of our service. The more listener hours we stream, the more ad inventory we have to sell. Further, growth in our listener base increases the size of demographic pools targeted by advertisers, which improves our ability to deliver advertising in a manner that maximizes our advertising customers' return on investment and, ultimately, to demonstrate the effectiveness of our advertising solutions and justify a pricing structure that is profitable for us. If we fail to grow our listener base and listener hours, particularly in key demographics such as young adults, we will be unable to grow advertising revenue, and our business will be materially and adversely affected.
Our ability to increase the number of our listeners and listener hours will depend on effectively addressing a number of challenges. Some of these challenges include:
•providing listeners with a consistent high quality, user-friendly and personalized experience;
•successfully penetrating the connected car and non-U.S. markets;
•continuing to build our catalogs of music and comedy content that our listeners enjoy;
•continuing to innovate and keep pace with changes in technology and our competitors;
17
•maintaining and building our relationships with makers of consumer products such as mobile devices, other consumer electronic products and automobiles to make our service available through their products;
•maintaining positive listener perception of our service while managing ad-load to optimize inventory utilization; and
•minimizing listener churn and attracting lapsed listeners back to the service.
In addition, we have historically relied heavily on the success of viral marketing to expand consumer awareness of our service. In addition to our viral marketing strategy, we are beginning to launch more costly marketing campaigns and this increase in marketing expenses could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. We cannot guarantee you that we will be successful in maintaining or expanding our listener base and failure to do so would materially reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Further, although we use our number of registered users and our number of active users as indicators of our brand awareness and the growth of our business, the number of registered users and number of active users exceeds the number of unique individuals who register for, or actively use, our service. We define registered users as the total number of accounts that have been created for our service at period end and we define active users as the number of distinct registered users that have requested audio from our servers within the trailing 30 days from the end of each calendar month. To establish an account, a person does not need to provide personally unique information. For this reason a person may have multiple accounts. If the number of actual listeners does not result in an increase in listener hours, then our business may not grow as quickly as we expect, which may harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If our efforts to attract and retain subscribers are not successful, our business may be adversely affected.
Our ability to continue to attract and retain subscribers will depend in part on our ability to consistently provide our subscribers with a quality experience through Pandora One. If Pandora One subscribers do not perceive that offering to be of value, or if we introduce new or adjust existing features or pricing in a manner that is not favorably received by them, we may not be able to attract and retain subscribers. Subscribers may cancel their subscription to our service for many reasons, including a perception that they do not use the service sufficiently, the need to cut household expenses, competitive services provide a better value or experience or as a result in changes in pricing, if any. If our efforts to attract and retain subscribers are not successful, our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.
If we fail to accurately predict and play music or comedy content that our listeners enjoy, we may fail to retain existing and attract new listeners.
We believe that a key differentiating factor between the Pandora service and other music content providers is our ability to predict music that our listeners will enjoy. Our personalized playlist generating system, based on the Music Genome Project and our proprietary algorithms, is designed to enable us to predict listener music preferences and select music content tailored to our listeners' individual music tastes. We have invested, and will continue to invest, significant resources in refining these technologies; however, we cannot guarantee you that such investments will yield an attractive return or that such refinements will be effective. The effectiveness of our personalized playlist generating system depends in part on our ability to gather and effectively analyze large amounts of listener data and listener feedback and we have no assurance that we will continue to be successful in enticing listeners to give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down to enough songs for our database to effectively predict and select new and existing songs. In addition, our ability to offer listeners songs that they have not previously heard and impart a sense of discovery depends on our ability to acquire and appropriately categorize additional tracks that will appeal to our listeners' diverse and changing tastes. While we have more than 1,000,000 songs in our catalog, we must continuously identify and analyze additional tracks that our listeners will enjoy and we may not effectively do so. Further, many of our competitors currently have larger catalogs than we offer and they may be more effective in providing their listeners with a more appealing listener experience.
We also provide comedy content on Pandora, an offering that is designed to predict what our listeners will enjoy using technology similar to the technology that we use to generate personalized playlists for music. The risks that apply to predicting our listeners' musical tastes apply to comedy to an even greater extent, particularly as we lack experience with content other than music, do not yet have as large a data set on listener preferences for comedy, and have a much smaller comedy catalog as compared to music. Our ability to predict and select music or comedy content that our listeners enjoy is critical to the perceived value of our service among listeners and failure to make accurate predictions would adversely affect our ability to attract and retain listeners, increase listener hours and sell advertising.
18
If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business and operating results may suffer.
Our rapid growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on our management and our operational and financial infrastructure. In order to attain and maintain profitability, we will need to recruit, integrate and retain skilled and experienced sales personnel who can demonstrate our value proposition to advertisers and increase the monetization of listener hours, particularly on mobile devices, by developing relationships with both national and local advertisers to convince them to migrate advertising spending to online and mobile digital advertising markets and utilize our advertising product solutions. Continued growth could also strain our ability to maintain reliable service levels for our listeners, effectively monetize our listener hours, develop and improve our operational, financial and management controls, enhance our reporting systems and procedures and recruit, train and retain highly skilled personnel. If our systems do not evolve to meet the increased demands placed on us by an increasing number of advertisers, we may also be unable to meet our obligations under advertising agreements with respect to the timing of our delivery of advertising or other performance obligations. As our operations grow in size, scope and complexity, we will need to improve and upgrade our systems and infrastructure, which will require significant expenditures and allocation of valuable management resources. If we fail to maintain the necessary level of discipline and efficiency and allocate limited resources effectively in our organization as it grows, our business, operating results and financial condition may suffer.
We face, and will continue to face, competition with other content providers for listener hours.
We compete for the time and attention of our listeners with other content providers on the basis of a number of factors, including quality of experience, relevance, acceptance and perception of content quality, ease of use, price, accessibility, perception of ad load, brand awareness and reputation.
Many of our competitors may leverage their existing infrastructure, brand recognition and content collections to augment their services by offering competing internet radio features to provide listeners with more comprehensive music service delivery choices. We face increasing competition for listeners from a growing variety of businesses that deliver audio media content through mobile phones and other wireless devices. We compete with many forms of media for the time and attention of our listeners, such as Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, Pinterest and Instagram. Our direct competitors, however, include iHeartRadio, iTunes Radio, LastFM, Google Songza and other companies in the traditional broadcast and internet radio market. We also directly compete with the non-interactive, Internet radio offerings such as Spotify and Slacker.
Our competitors include terrestrial radio, satellite radio and internet radio. Terrestrial radio providers offer their content for free, are well-established and accessible to listeners and offer content, such as news, sports, traffic, weather and talk that we currently do not offer. In addition, many terrestrial radio stations have begun broadcasting digital signals, which provide high-quality audio transmission. Satellite radio providers may offer extensive and oftentimes exclusive news, comedy, sports and talk content, national signal coverage and long-established automobile integration. In addition, terrestrial radio pays no royalties for its use of sound recordings and satellite radio pays a much lower percentage of revenue, 9.5% in 2014 and 10% in 2015, than internet radio providers for use of sound recordings, giving broadcast and satellite radio companies a significant cost advantage. We also compete directly with other emerging non-interactive internet radio providers, which may offer more extensive content libraries than we offer and some of which may be accessed internationally.
On-demand audio media and entertainment which are purchased or available for free and playable on mobile devices, automobiles and in the home, provide listeners with an interactive experience. These forms of media may be purchased, downloaded and owned as iTunes audio files, MP3s, CDs, or accessed from subscription or free online on-demand offerings by music providers.
We compete for the time and attention of our listeners with providers of other forms of in-home and mobile entertainment. To the extent existing or potential listeners choose to watch cable television, stream video from on-demand services or play interactive video games on their home-entertainment system, computer or mobile phone rather than listen to the Pandora service, these content services pose a competitive threat.
We believe that companies with a combination of financial resources, technical expertise and digital media experience also pose a significant threat of developing competing internet radio and digital audio entertainment technologies. For example, Apple, Amazon and Google have recently launched competing services, and they may devote greater resources than we have available, have a more accelerated time frame for deployment and leverage their existing user base and proprietary technologies to provide products and services that our listeners and advertisers may view as superior. Our current and future competitors may have more well-established brand recognition, more established relationships with music publishing companies and consumer product manufacturers, greater financial, technical and other resources, more sophisticated technologies or more
19
experience in the markets, both domestic and international, in which we compete.
We also compete for listeners on the basis of the presence and visibility of our web tuner and app as compared with other businesses and software that deliver audio and other content through the internet, mobile devices and consumer products. We face significant competition for listeners from companies promoting their own digital music and content online or through app stores, including Apple, Amazon and Google. Search engines and app stores rank responses to search queries based on the popularity of a website or mobile application, as well as other factors that are outside of our control. Additionally, app stores often offer users the ability to browse applications by various criteria, such as the number of downloads in a given time period, the length of time since a mobile app was released or updated, or the category in which the application is placed. The websites and mobile applications of our competitors may rank higher than our website and our Pandora app, and our app may be difficult to locate in app stores, which could draw potential listeners away from our service and toward those of our competitors. In addition, our competitors' products may be pre-loaded or integrated into consumer electronics products or automobiles, creating an initial visibility advantage. If we are unable to compete successfully for listeners against other digital media providers by maintaining and increasing our presence and visibility online, in app stores and in consumer electronics products and automobiles, our listener hours may fail to increase as expected or decline and our advertising sales may suffer.
To compete effectively, we must continue to invest significant resources in the development of our service to enhance the user experience of our listeners. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully for listeners in the future against existing or new competitors, and failure to do so could result in loss of existing or potential listeners, reduced revenue, increased marketing expenses or diminished brand strength, any of which could harm our business.
We face, and will continue to face, competition with other content providers for advertising spending.
We compete for a share of advertisers' overall marketing budgets with other content providers on a variety of factors including perceived return on investment, effectiveness and relevance of our advertising products, pricing structure and ability to deliver large volumes or precise types of ads to targeted demographics. Our competitors include Facebook, Google, MSN, Yahoo!, ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, among others. We directly compete against iHeartRadio, Entercom, Cumulus and other companies of the traditional broadcast radio market.
Although advertisers are allocating an increasing amount of their overall marketing budgets to web and mobile-based ads, such spending lags behind growth in internet and mobile usage, and the market for online and mobile advertising is intensely competitive. As a result, we compete for advertisers with a range of internet companies, including major internet portals, search engine companies and social media sites. Large internet companies with greater brand recognition have significant numbers of direct sales personnel, more advanced programmatic advertising capabilities and substantial proprietary advertising inventory and web traffic that provide a significant competitive advantage and have a significant impact on pricing for internet advertising and web traffic. The trend toward consolidation among online marketing and media companies may also affect pricing and availability of advertising inventory.
We also face significant competition for advertising dollars from terrestrial and, to a lesser extent, satellite radio providers. As many of the advertisers we target, particularly local advertisers, have traditionally advertised on terrestrial radio and have less experience with internet radio providers, they may be reluctant to spend for advertising on computers, mobile or other connected device platforms.
In addition, terrestrial radio providers as well as other traditional media companies in television and print, cable television channel providers, national newspapers and some regional newspapers enjoy a number of competitive advantages over us in attracting advertisers, including large established audiences, longer operating histories, greater brand recognition and a growing presence on the internet.
In order to compete successfully for advertisers against new and existing competitors, we must continue to invest resources in developing and diversifying our advertisement platform, harnessing listener data and ultimately proving the effectiveness and relevance of our advertising products. Failure to compete successfully against our current or future competitors could result in loss of current or potential advertisers or a reduced share of our advertisers' overall marketing budget, which could adversely affect our pricing and margins, lower our revenue, increase our research and development and marketing expenses and prevent us from achieving or maintaining profitability.
Our ability to increase the number of our listeners will depend in part on our ability to establish and maintain relationships with automakers, automotive suppliers and consumer electronics manufacturers with products that integrate our service.
A key element of our strategy to expand the reach of our service and increase the number of our listeners and listener
20
hours is to establish and maintain relationships with automakers, automotive suppliers and consumer electronics manufacturers that integrate our service into and with their products. Working with certain third-party distribution partners, we currently offer listeners the ability to access our service through a variety of consumer electronics products used in the home and devices connected to or installed in automobiles. We intend to broaden our ability to reach additional listeners, and increase current listener’s hours, through other platforms and partners over time, including through direct integration into connected cars. However, reaching agreements with automobile manufacturers and other distribution partners can be time consuming, and once an agreement is reached, product design cycles can be lengthy. If we are not successful in maintaining existing and creating new relationships, or if we encounter technological, content licensing or other impediments, our ability to grow our business could be adversely impacted.
Our existing agreements with partners in the automobile and consumer electronics industries generally do not obligate those partners to offer our service in their products. In addition, some automobile manufacturers or their supplier partners may terminate their agreements with us for convenience. Our business could be adversely affected if our automobile partners and consumer electronics partners do not continue to provide access to our service or are unwilling to do so on terms acceptable to us. If we are forced to amend the business terms of our distribution agreements as a result of competitive pressure, our ability to maintain and expand the reach of our service and increase listener hours would be adversely affected, which would reduce our revenue and harm our operating results.
Additionally, we distribute our app via app stores managed by Apple, Google, Amazon and Microsoft, and such distribution is subject to an application developer license agreement in each case. Should any of these parties reject our app from their application store or amend the terms of their license in such a way that inhibits our ability to distribute the Pandora apps via their application store, or negatively impacts our economics in such distribution, our ability to increase listener hours and sell advertising would be adversely affected, which would reduce our revenue and harm our operating results.
If we are unable to continue to make our technology compatible with the technologies of third-party distribution partners who make our service available to our listeners through mobile devices, consumer electronic products and automobiles, we may not remain competitive and our business may fail to grow or decline.
In order to deliver music everywhere our listeners want to hear it, our service must be compatible with mobile, consumer electronic, automobile and website technologies. Our service is accessible in part through Pandora-developed or third-party developed apps that hardware manufacturers embed in, and distribute through, their devices. Connected devices and their underlying technologies are constantly evolving. As internet connectivity of automobiles, mobile devices and other consumer electronic products expands and as new internet-connected products are introduced, we must constantly adapt our technology. It is difficult to keep pace with the continual release of new devices and technological advances in digital media delivery and predict the problems we may encounter in developing versions of our apps for these new devices and delivery channels. It may become increasingly challenging to do so in the future. In particular, the technology used for streaming the Pandora service in automobiles remains at an early stage and may not result in a seamless customer experience. If automobile and consumer electronics makers fail to make products that are compatible with our technology or we fail to adapt our technology to evolving requirements, our ability to grow or sustain the reach of our service, increase listener hours and sell advertising could be adversely affected.
Consumer tastes and preferences can change in rapid and unpredictable ways and consumer acceptance of these products depends on the marketing, technical and other efforts of third-party manufacturers, which is beyond our control. If consumers fail to accept the products of the companies with whom we partner or if we fail to establish relationships with makers of leading consumer products, our business could be adversely affected.
Unavailability of, or fluctuations in, third-party measurements of our audience may adversely affect our ability to grow advertising revenue.
Selling ads, locally and nationally, requires that we demonstrate to advertisers that our service has substantial reach and usage. Third-party measurements may not reflect our true listening audience and their underlying methodologies are subject to change at any time. In addition, the methodologies we apply to measure the key metrics that we use to monitor and manage our business may differ from the methodologies used by third-party measurement service providers. For example, we calculate listener hours based on the total bytes served for each track that is requested and served from our servers, as measured by our internal analytics systems, whether or not a listener listens to the entire track. By contrast, certain third-party measurement service providers may calculate and report the number of listener hours using a client-based approach, which measures time elapsed during listening sessions. Measurement technologies for mobile and consumer electronic devices may be even less reliable in quantifying the reach, usage and location of our service, and it is not clear whether such technologies will integrate with our systems or uniformly and comprehensively reflect the reach, usage and location of our service. While we have been
21
working with third-party measurement service providers and certain of their measurements have now earned Media Ratings Council accreditation, some providers have not yet developed uniform measurement systems that comprehensively measure the reach, usage and location of our service. In order to demonstrate to potential advertisers the benefits of our service, we supplement third-party measurement data with our internal research, which may be perceived as less valuable than third-party numbers. If third-party measurement providers report lower metrics than we do, or if there is wide variance among reported metrics, our ability to convince advertisers of the benefits of our service could be adversely affected.
The lack of accurate cross-platform measurements for internet radio and broadcast radio may adversely affect our ability to grow advertising revenue.
We have invested substantial resources to create accurate cross-platform measurements for internet radio and broadcast radio in the major automated media-buying platforms, creating a one-stop shop that enables media buyers to compare internet radio audience reach with terrestrial radio audience reach using traditional broadcast radio metrics. To achieve this result, we currently rely on third parties such as Triton to quantify the reach and usage of our service and on media buying agencies to provide Internet radio metrics side-by-side with terrestrial radio metrics in media-buying platforms.
We have also partnered with media buying agencies that show internet radio measurements alongside terrestrial metrics in the media buying systems that media buyers use to purchase advertising. Media buying agencies receive measurement metrics from third parties, such as Triton for internet radio and Nielsen for more traditional media like terrestrial radio and television. Media buying agencies may choose not to show, or may be prohibited by third-party measurement services that measure terrestrial radio and other traditional media from showing, internet radio metrics alongside traditional terrestrial metrics. Our ability to realize our long-term potential will be significantly affected by our success in these advertising initiatives, and there is no assurance we will achieve substantial penetration of these advertising markets.
Our success depends upon the continued acceptance of online advertising as an alternative or supplement to offline advertising.
The percentage of the advertising industry allocated to online advertising lags the percentage of consumer online consumption by a significant degree. Growth of our business will depend in large part on the reduction or elimination of this gap between online and offline advertising spending, which may not happen in a way or to the extent that we currently expect. Many advertisers still have limited experience with online advertising and may continue to devote significant portions of their advertising budgets to traditional, offline advertising media. Accordingly, we continue to compete for advertising dollars with traditional media, including broadcast radio. We believe that the continued growth and acceptance of our online advertising products will depend on the perceived effectiveness and the acceptance of online advertising models generally, which is outside of our control. Any lack of growth in the industry for online advertising could result in reduced revenue or increased marketing expenses, which would harm our operating results and financial condition.
Assertions by third parties of violations under state law with respect to the public performance and reproduction of pre-1972 sound recordings could result in significant costs and substantially harm our business and operating results.
As described in “Business—Content, Copyrights and Royalties—Sound Recordings”, sound recordings made on or after February 15, 1972 fall within the scope of federal copyright protection. Subject to our ongoing compliance with numerous federal statutory conditions and regulatory requirements for a noninteractive service, we are permitted to operate our radio service under a statutory license that allows the streaming in the U.S. of any such sound recording lawfully released to the public and permits us to make reproductions of such sound recordings on computer servers pursuant to a separate statutory license designed to facilitate the making of such transmissions.
By contrast, protection of sound recordings created prior to February 15, 1972 (“pre-1972 sound recordings”) remains governed by a patchwork of state statutory and common laws. Copyright owners of pre-1972 sound recordings have commenced litigation against us, alleging violations of New York and California state statutory and common laws with respect to the unauthorized reproduction and public performance of pre-1972 sound recordings, seeking, among other things, restitution, disgorgement of profits, and punitive damages as well as injunctive relief prohibiting further violation of those copyright owners’ alleged exclusive rights. Litigation has been brought previously against Sirius XM Radio Inc. (“Sirius”) for similar claims, and a federal district court and a state court in California recently ruled against Sirius for violating exclusive public performance rights in California. In addition, a federal district court in New York has found Sirius liable for similar claims in New York. Those same plaintiffs have initiated litigation against us, alleging similar violations of exclusive rights under California and New York law. If we are found liable for the violation of the exclusive rights of any pre-1972 sound recording copyright owners, then we could be subject to liability, the amount of which could be significant. If we are required to obtain licenses from individual sound recording copyright owners for the reproduction and public performance of pre-1972
22
sound recordings, then the time, effort and cost of securing such licenses directly from all owners of sound recording used on our service could be significant and could harm our business and operating results. If we are required to obtain licenses for pre-1972 sound recordings to avoid liability and are unable to secure such licenses, then we may have to remove pre-1972 sound recordings from our service, which could harm our ability to attract and retain users.
Our royalty payments are subject to audits and certain royalty calculation methods involve significant judgment.
The royalties that we pay to SoundExchange for the streaming of sound recordings are calculated using a per performance rate. While we believe that the mechanisms we use to track performances are sufficient to ensure that we are accurately reporting and paying royalties, our ability to do so depends in part on our ability to maintain these mechanisms as new devices are introduced and technologies evolve. Any understatement or overstatement of performances could result in our paying lower or higher royalties to SoundExchange than we actually owed, which could in turn affect our financial condition and results of operations. SoundExchange informed us in December 2013 that it intends to audit our payments for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012. As of December 31, 2014, we are in the process of coordinating this audit with SoundExchange. In addition, performing rights organizations and musical work copyright owners with whom we have entered into direct licenses have or may have the right to audit our royalty payments, and any such audit could result in disputes over whether we have paid the proper royalties. If such a dispute were to occur, we could be required to pay additional royalties and audit fees. The amounts involved could be material.
Rate court proceedings, the attempted and/or purported withdrawal of certain music publishers or the rights to certain of their works for certain purposes from ASCAP and BMI, and our entry into a local marketing agreement to program KXMZ-FM have highlighted uncertainties for the royalty rates that we pay for the public performance of musical works. For example, we could be liable for both increased royalty rates going forward and a potential true-up of royalty payments in excess of any interim royalties paid (i) for the period following December 31, 2010 with respect to ASCAP if ASCAP successfully appeals the rate court’s March 2014 ruling, and (ii) for the period following December 31, 2012 with respect to BMI. We record a liability for public performance royalties based on our best estimate of the amount owed to each organization based on historical rates, third-party evidence and legal developments. For each quarterly period, we evaluate our estimates to assess the adequacy of recorded liabilities. If actual royalty rates differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated royalty liabilities may be required, which could materially affect our results of operations. Any royalty audit could result in disputes over whether we have paid the proper royalties.
Expansion of our operations into non-music content, including our launch of comedy, subjects us to additional business, legal, financial and competitive risks.
Expansion of our operations into delivery of non-music content stations involves numerous risks and challenges, including increased capital requirements, new competitors and the need to develop new strategic relationships. Growth into this new area may require changes to our existing business model and cost structure, modifications to our infrastructure and exposure to new regulatory and legal risks, including infringement liability, any of which may require expertise in which we have little or no experience. There is no guarantee that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from advertising sales associated with comedy content to offset the costs of maintaining comedy stations or the royalties paid for such comedy stations. Further, we have established a reputation as a music format internet radio provider and our ability to gain acceptance and listenership for comedy content stations, and thus our ability to attract advertisers on comedy stations, is not certain. Failure to obtain or retain rights to comedy content on acceptable terms, or at all, to successfully monetize and generate revenues from such content, or to effectively manage the numerous risks and challenges associated with such expansion could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. To the extent we choose, in the future, to offer additional types of content beyond music and comedy, such as news, talk and sports programming, we will be subject to many of these same risks.
Loss of agreements with the makers of mobile operating systems and devices, renegotiation of such agreements on less favorable terms, or other actions these third parties may take could harm our business.
Most of our agreements with makers of mobile operating systems and devices through which our service may be accessed, including Apple, Google and Microsoft, are short-term or can be canceled at any time with little or no prior notice or penalty. The loss of these agreements, or the renegotiation of these agreements on less favorable economic or other terms, could limit the reach of our service and its attractiveness to advertisers. Some of these mobile device makers, including Apple, are now, or may in the future become, competitors of ours, and could stop allowing or supporting access to our service through their products for competitive reasons. Furthermore, because devices providing access to our service are not manufactured and sold by us, we cannot guarantee that these companies will ensure that their devices perform reliably, and any faulty connection between these devices and our service may result in consumer dissatisfaction toward us, which could damage our brand.
23
We rely upon an agreement with DoubleClick, which is owned by Google, for delivering and monitoring our ads. Failure to renew the agreement on favorable terms, or termination of the agreement, could adversely affect our business.
We use DoubleClick's ad-serving platform to deliver and monitor ads for our service. There can be no assurance that our agreement with DoubleClick, which is owned by Google, will be extended or renewed upon expiration, that we will be able to extend or renew our agreement with DoubleClick on terms and conditions favorable to us or that we could identify another alternative vendor to take its place. Our agreement with DoubleClick also allows DoubleClick to terminate our relationship before the expiration of the agreement on the occurrence of certain events, including material breach of the agreement by us, and to suspend provision of the services if DoubleClick determines that our use of its service violates certain security, technology or content standards.
If we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting may be adversely affected.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. The report contains, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of year-end, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by management.
While we have determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014, as indicated in our Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we must continue to monitor and assess our internal control over financial reporting. If our management identifies one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and such weakness remains uncorrected at year-end, we will be unable to assert that such internal control is effective at year-end. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective at year-end, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls or concludes that we have a material weakness in our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the price of our common stock.
Our business and prospects depend on the strength of our brand and failure to maintain and enhance our brand would harm our ability to expand our base of listeners, advertisers and other partners.
Maintaining and enhancing the "Pandora" brand is critical to expanding our base of listeners, advertisers and other partners. Maintaining and enhancing our brand will depend largely on our ability to continue to develop and provide an innovative and high quality experience for our listeners and attract advertisers, content owners and automobile, mobile device and other consumer electronic product manufacturers to work with us, which we may not do successfully.
Our brand may be impaired by a number of other factors, including service outages, data privacy and security issues, listener perception of ad load and exploitation of our trademarks by others without permission. In addition, if our partners fail to maintain high standards for products that integrate our service, fail to display our trademarks on their products in breach of our agreements with them, or use our trademarks incorrectly or in an unauthorized manner or if we partner with manufacturers of products that our listeners reject, the strength of our brand could be adversely affected. Further, our efforts to achieve a more equitable royalty structure for our business may have an adverse impact on our relationship with songwriters, performers, and other artists, which could in turn diminish the perception of our brand. In addition, there is a risk that the word "Pandora" could become so commonly used that we lose protection for this trademark, which could result in other people using the word "Pandora" to refer to their own products, thus diminishing the strength of our brand.
We have not historically incurred significant expenses to establish and maintain our brand. However, if we are unable to maintain the growth rate in the number of our listeners, we may be required to expend greater resources on advertising, marketing and other brand-building efforts to preserve and enhance consumer awareness of our brand which would adversely affect our operating results and may not be effective.
We depend on key personnel to operate our business, and if we are unable to retain, attract and integrate qualified personnel, our ability to develop and successfully grow our business could be harmed.
We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the contributions of our executive officers as well as our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and experienced sales, technical and other personnel. All of our employees, including
24
our executive officers, are free to terminate their employment relationship with us at any time, and their knowledge of our business and industry may be difficult to replace. Qualified individuals are in high demand, particularly in the digital media industry, and we may incur significant costs to attract them. In addition, competition for qualified personnel is particularly intense in the San Francisco Bay Area, where our headquarters are located. If we are unable to attract and retain our executive officers and key employees, we may not be able to achieve our strategic objectives, and our business could be harmed. In addition, we believe that our key executives have developed highly successful and effective working relationships. If one or more of these individuals leave, we may not be able to fully integrate new executives or replicate the current dynamic and working relationships that have developed among our executive officers and other key personnel, and our operations could suffer.
Interruptions or delays in service arising from our own systems or from our third-party vendors could impair the delivery of our service and harm our business.
We rely on systems housed in our own facilities and upon third-party vendors, including bandwidth providers and data center facilities located in the United States and New Zealand, to enable listeners to receive our content in a dependable, timely and efficient manner. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience periodic service interruptions and delays involving our own systems and those of our third-party vendors. In the event of a service outage at our main site, we maintain a backup site that can function in read-only capacity. We do not currently maintain live fail-over capability that would allow us to instantaneous switch our streaming operations from one facility to another in the event of a service outage. In the event of an extended service outage at our main site, we do maintain and test fail-over capabilities that should allow us to switch our live streaming operations from one facility to another. Both our own facilities and those of our third-party vendors are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunications failures and similar events. They also are subject to break-ins, hacking, denial of service attacks, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism, terrorist acts, natural disasters, human error, the financial insolvency of our third-party vendors and other unanticipated problems or events. The occurrence of any of these events could result in interruptions in our service and to unauthorized access to, or alteration of, the content and data contained on our systems and that these third-party vendors store and deliver on our behalf.
We exercise no control over our third-party vendors, which makes us vulnerable to any errors, interruptions, or delays in their operations. Any disruption in the services provided by these vendors could have significant adverse impacts on our business reputation, customer relations and operating results. Upon expiration or termination of any of our agreements with third-party vendors, we may not be able to replace the services provided to us in a timely manner or on terms and conditions, including service levels and cost, that are favorable to us, and a transition from one vendor to another vendor could subject us to operational delays and inefficiencies until the transition is complete.
Our operating results may fluctuate, which makes our results difficult to predict and could cause our results to fall short of expectations.
Our revenue and operating results could vary significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. In addition to other risk factors discussed in this "Risk Factors" section, factors that may contribute to the variability of our quarterly and annual results include:
•costs associated with defending any litigation, including intellectual property infringement litigation;
•our ability to pursue, and the timing of, entry into new geographic or content markets and, if pursued, our management of this expansion;
•the impact of general economic conditions on our revenue and expenses; and
•changes in government regulation affecting our business.
Seasonal variations in listener and advertising behavior may also cause fluctuations in our financial results. We expect to experience some effects of seasonal trends in listener behavior due to higher advertising sales during the fourth quarter of each calendar year due to greater advertiser demand during the holiday season and lower advertising sales in the first three months of the following calendar year due to reduced advertiser demand. Expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical and discretionary in nature, reflecting overall economic conditions, the economic prospects of specific advertisers or industries, budgeting constraints and buying patterns and a variety of other factors, many of which are outside our control. In addition, we expect to experience increased usage during the fourth quarter of each calendar year due to the holiday season, and in the first quarter of each calendar year due to increased use of media-streaming devices received as gifts during the holiday season.
25
While we believe these seasonal trends have affected and will continue to affect our quarterly results, our trajectory of rapid growth may have overshadowed these effects to date.
Failure to protect our intellectual property could substantially harm our business and operating results.
The success of our business depends, in part, on our ability to protect and enforce our trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents and all of our other intellectual property rights, including our intellectual property rights underlying the Pandora service. We attempt to protect our intellectual property under trade secret, trademark, copyright and patent law, and through a combination of employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements, other contractual restrictions, technological measures and other methods. These afford only limited protection. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights and trade secrets, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our song selection technology or obtain and use our trade secrets and other confidential information. Moreover, policing our intellectual property rights is difficult, costly and may not always be effective.
We have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications and we have purchased portfolios of internet radio-related patents from third parties. It is possible, however, that these innovations may not be protectable. In addition, given the cost, effort, risks and downside of obtaining patent protection, including the requirement to ultimately disclose the invention to the public, we may choose not to seek patent protection for certain innovations. However, such patent protection could later prove to be important to our business. Furthermore, there is always the possibility that our patent applications may not issue as granted patents, that the scope of the protection gained will be insufficient or that an issued patent may be deemed invalid or unenforceable. We also cannot guarantee the following:
•that any of our present or future patents or other intellectual property rights will not lapse or be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or abandoned;
•that our intellectual property rights will provide competitive advantages to us;
•that our ability to assert our intellectual property rights against potential competitors or to settle current or future disputes will not be limited by our relationships with third parties;
•that any of our pending or future patent applications will have the coverage originally sought;
•that our intellectual property rights will be enforced in jurisdictions where competition may be intense or where legal protection may be weak; or
•that we will not lose the ability to assert our intellectual property rights against or to license our technology to others and collect royalties or other payments.
We have registered "Pandora," "Music Genome Project" and other marks as trademarks in the United States. Nevertheless, competitors may adopt service names similar to ours, or purchase our trademarks and confusingly similar terms as keywords in internet search engine advertising programs, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to confusion among our listeners or advertising customers. In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of the term Pandora or our other trademarks. Any claims or customer confusion related to our trademarks could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and operating results.
We currently own the www.pandora.com internet domain name and various other related domain names. Domain names are generally regulated by internet regulatory bodies. If we lose the ability to use a domain name in a particular country, we would be forced either to incur significant additional expenses to market our service within that country. Either result could harm our business and operating results. The regulation of domain names in the United States and in foreign countries is subject to change. Regulatory bodies could establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names. As a result, we may not be able to acquire or maintain the domain names that utilize our brand names in the United States or other countries in which we may conduct business in the future.
In order to protect our trade secrets and other confidential information, we rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties with whom we have relationships. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of misappropriation of trade secrets or any unauthorized disclosure of trade secrets and other confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and confidential information, and in some such cases we might not be able
26
to assert any trade secret rights against such parties. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our trade secret rights and related confidentiality and nondisclosure provisions, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection, or our competitors' obtainment of our trade secrets or independent development of unpatented technology similar to ours or competing technologies, could adversely affect our competitive business position.
Litigation or proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or other governmental authorities and administrative bodies in the United States and abroad may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our patent rights, trademarks, trade secrets and domain names and to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Our efforts to enforce or protect our proprietary rights may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management time, each of which could substantially harm our operating results.
Assertions by third parties of infringement or other violation by us of their intellectual property rights could result in significant costs and substantially harm our business and operating results.
Internet, technology and media companies are frequently subject to litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property rights. Some internet, technology and media companies, including some of our competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, which they may use to assert claims against us. In addition, we encourage third parties to submit content for our catalogue and we cannot be assured that artist representations made in connection with such submissions accurately reflect the legal rights of the submitted content. Third parties have asserted, and may in the future assert, that we have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights. In addition, various federal and state laws and regulations govern the intellectual property and related rights associated with sound recordings and musical works. Existing laws and regulations are evolving and subject to different interpretations, and various federal and state legislative or regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws or regulations. We cannot guarantee you that we are not infringing or violating any third-party intellectual property rights.
We cannot predict whether assertions of third-party intellectual property rights or any infringement or misappropriation claims arising from such assertions will substantially harm our business and operating results. If we are forced to defend against any infringement or misappropriation claims, we may be required to expend significant time and financial resources on the defense of such claims, even if without merit, settled out of court, or determined in our favor. Furthermore, an adverse outcome of a dispute may require us to: pay damages, potentially including treble damages and attorneys' fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a party's intellectual property; cease making, licensing or using products or services that are alleged to infringe or misappropriate the intellectual property of others; expend additional development resources to redesign our services; enter into potentially unfavorable royalty or license agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary technologies, content or materials; or to indemnify our partners and other third parties. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required or desirable, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and may require significant royalty payments and other expenditures. In addition, we do not carry broadly applicable patent liability insurance and any lawsuits regarding patent rights, regardless of their success, could be expensive to resolve and would divert the time and attention of our management and technical personnel.
We may require additional capital to pursue our business objectives and respond to business opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances. If capital is not available to us, our business, operating results and financial condition may be harmed.
We may require additional capital to operate or expand our business. In addition, some of our current or future strategic initiatives, including entry into non-music content channels, such as comedy, or international markets, may require substantial additional capital resources before they begin to generate revenue. Additional funds may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. For example, our current credit facility contains restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, and any debt financing secured by us in the future could involve further restrictive covenants, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities. In addition, volatility in the credit markets may have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain debt financing. If we do not have funds available to enhance our solutions, maintain the competitiveness of our technology and pursue business opportunities, we may not be able to service our existing listeners, acquire new listeners or attract or retain advertising customers, each of which could inhibit the implementation of our business plan and materially harm our operating results.
We may acquire other companies or technologies, which could divert our management's attention, result in additional dilution to our stockholders and otherwise disrupt our operations and harm our operating results.
We may in the future seek to acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies that we believe could complement
27
or expand our service, enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities. The pursuit of potential acquisitions may divert the attention of management and cause us to incur various expenses in identifying, investigating and pursuing suitable acquisitions, whether or not they are consummated.
In addition, we have limited experience acquiring other businesses. If we acquire additional businesses, we may not be able to integrate the acquired personnel, operations and technologies successfully, or effectively manage the combined business following the acquisition. We also may not achieve the anticipated benefits from the acquired business due to a number of factors, including:
•unanticipated costs or liabilities associated with the acquisition;
•incurrence of acquisition-related costs;
•diversion of management's attention from other business concerns;
•regulatory uncertainties;
•harm to our existing business relationships with business partners and advertisers as a result of the acquisition;
•harm to our brand and reputation;
•the potential loss of key employees;
•use of resources that are needed in other parts of our business; and
•use of substantial portions of our available cash to consummate the acquisition.
In addition, a significant portion of the purchase price of companies we acquire may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets, which must be assessed for impairment at least annually. In the future, if our acquisitions do not yield expected returns, we may be required to take charges to our operating results based on this impairment assessment process.
Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, if an acquired business fails to meet our expectations, our operating results, business and financial condition may suffer.
We face many risks associated with our long-term plan to further expand our operations outside of the United States, including difficulties obtaining rights to music and other content on favorable terms.
Expanding our operations into international markets is an element of our long-term strategy. For example, in June 2012 we began providing our service in New Zealand, Australia and their associated territories. However, offering our service outside of the United States involves numerous risks and challenges. Most importantly, while United States copyright law provides a statutory licensing regime for the public performance of sound recordings to listeners within the United States, there is no equivalent statutory licensing regime available outside of the United States, and many of the other licensing alternatives currently available in other countries are not commercially viable. Currently, the licensing terms offered by rights organizations and individual copyright owners in most countries outside the United States are prohibitively expensive. Addressing licensing structure and royalty rate issues in the United States required us to make very substantial investments of time, capital and other resources, and our business could have failed if such investments had not succeeded. Addressing these issues in foreign jurisdictions may require a commensurate investment by us, and there can be no assurance that we would succeed or achieve any return on this investment.
In addition, international expansion exposes us to other risks such as:
•the need to modify our technology and sell our solutions in non-English speaking countries;
•the need to localize our service to foreign customers' preferences and customs;
•the need to conform our marketing and advertising efforts with the laws and regulations of foreign jurisdictions, including, but not limited to, the use of any personal information about our listeners;
28
•the need to amend existing agreements and to enter into new agreements with automakers, automotive suppliers, consumer electronics manufacturers with products that integrate our service, and others in order to provide that service in foreign countries;
•difficulties in managing operations due to language barriers, distance, staffing, cultural differences and business infrastructure constraints and domestic laws regulating corporations that operate internationally;
•our lack of experience in marketing, and encouraging viral marketing growth without incurring significant marketing expenses, in foreign countries;
•application of foreign laws and regulations to us;
•fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
•reduced or ineffective protection of our intellectual property rights in some countries; and
•potential adverse tax consequences associated with foreign operations and revenue.
Furthermore, in most international markets, we would not be the first entrant, and our competitors may be better positioned than we are to succeed. In addition, in jurisdictions where copyright protection has been insufficient to protect against widespread music piracy, achieving market acceptance of our service may prove difficult as we would need to convince listeners to stream our service when they could otherwise download the same music for free. As a result of these obstacles, we may find it impossible or prohibitively expensive to enter or sustain our presence in foreign markets, or entry into foreign markets could be delayed, which could hinder our ability to grow our business.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
At December 31, 2014, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $447 million and tax credit carryforwards of approximately $7.9 million. At December 31, 2014, we had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $496 million and tax credit carryforwards of approximately of $8.3 million. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, ("the Code"), if a corporation undergoes an "ownership change," the corporation's ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its post-change income may be limited. In general, an "ownership change" will occur if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by "5-percent shareholders" that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. As a result of prior equity issuances and other transactions in our stock, we have previously experienced "ownership changes" under section 382 of the Code and comparable state tax laws. We may also experience ownership changes in the future as a result of future transactions in our stock. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards or other pre-change tax attributes to offset United States federal and state taxable income is subject to limitations.
We could be subject to additional income tax liabilities.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating and estimating our worldwide provision for income taxes and accruals for these taxes. For example, our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory tax rates, by losses incurred in jurisdictions for which we are not able to realize the related tax benefit, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. We are also subject to tax audits in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional income tax liabilities against us.
If we cannot maintain our corporate culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, teamwork and focus that contribute crucially to our business.
We believe that a critical component of our success is our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, encourages teamwork, cultivates creativity and promotes focus on execution. We have invested substantial time, energy and resources in building a highly collaborative team that works together effectively in a non-hierarchical environment designed to promote openness, honesty, mutual respect and pursuit of common goals. As we continue to develop the infrastructure of a
29
public company and grow, we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects of our corporate culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could negatively impact our future success, including our ability to attract and retain employees, encourage innovation and teamwork and effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives.
Federal, state and industry regulations as well as self-regulation related to privacy and data security concerns pose the threat of lawsuits and other liability, require us to expend significant resources, and may hinder our ability and our advertisers' ability to deliver relevant advertising.
We collect and utilize demographic and other information, including personally identifiable information, from and about our listeners and artists as they interact with our service. For example, to register for a Pandora account, our listeners must provide the following information: age, gender, zip code and e-mail address. Listeners must also provide their credit card or debit card numbers and other billing information in connection with additional service offerings. We also may collect information from our listeners when they enter information on their profile page, post comments on other listeners' pages, use other community or social networking features that are part of our service, participate in polls or contests or sign up to receive e-mail newsletters. Further, we and third parties use tracking technologies, including "cookies" and related technologies, to help us manage and track our listeners' interactions with our service and deliver relevant advertising. We also collect information from and track artists’ activity on our Pandora Artist Marketing Platform ("Pandora AMP"). Third parties may, either without our knowledge or consent, or in violation of contractual prohibitions, obtain, transmit or utilize our listeners' or artists' personally identifiable information, or data associated with particular users, devices or artists.
Various federal and state laws and regulations, as well as the laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we may choose to operate, govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of the data we receive from and about our listeners. Privacy groups and government authorities have increasingly scrutinized the ways in which companies link personal identities and data associated with particular users or devices with data collected through the internet, and we expect such scrutiny to continue to increase. Alleged violations of laws and regulations relating to privacy and data security, and any relevant claims, may expose us to potential liability and may require us to expend significant resources in responding to and defending such allegations and claims. Claims or allegations that we have violated laws and regulations relating to privacy and data security have resulted and could in the future result in negative publicity and a loss of confidence in us by our listeners and our advertisers.
Existing privacy-related laws and regulations are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations, and various federal and state legislative and regulatory bodies, as well as foreign legislative and regulatory bodies, may expand current or enact new laws regarding privacy and data security-related matters. We may find it necessary or desirable to join self-regulatory bodies or other privacy-related organizations that require compliance with their rules pertaining to privacy and data security. We also may be bound by contractual obligations that limit our ability to collect, use, disclose and leverage listener data and to derive economic value from it. New laws, amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws, rules of self-regulatory bodies, industry standards and contractual obligations, as well as changes in our listeners' expectations and demands regarding privacy and data security, may limit our ability to collect, use and disclose, and to leverage and derive economic value from listener data. We may also be required to expend significant resources to adapt to these changes and to develop new ways to deliver relevant advertising or otherwise provide value to our advertisers. In particular, government regulators have proposed "do not track" mechanisms, and requirements that users affirmatively "opt-in" to certain types of data collection that, if enacted into law or adopted by self-regulatory bodies or as part of industry standards, could significantly hinder our ability to collect and use data relating to listeners. Restrictions on our ability to collect, access and harness listener data, or to use or disclose listener data or any profiles that we develop using such data, could in turn limit our ability to stream personalized music content to our listeners and offer targeted advertising opportunities to our advertising customers, each of which are critical to the success of our business.
We have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenses to comply with privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, self-regulatory bodies, industry standards and contractual obligations. Increased regulation of data utilization and distribution practices, including self-regulation and industry standards, could increase our cost of operation, limit our ability to grow our operations or otherwise adversely affect our business.
If our security systems are breached, we may face civil liability and public perception of our security measures could be diminished, either of which would negatively affect our ability to attract and retain listeners and advertisers.
Techniques used to gain unauthorized access to corporate data systems are constantly evolving, and we may be unable to anticipate or prevent unauthorized access to data pertaining to our listeners, including credit card and debit card information and other personally identifiable information. Like all internet services, our service, which is supported by our own systems and those of third-party vendors, is vulnerable to computer malware, Trojans, worms, break-ins, phishing attacks, attempts to overload servers with denial-of-service, attempts to access our servers to stream music or acquire playlists, or other attacks and
30
disruptions from unauthorized use of our and third-party vendor computer systems, any of which could lead to system interruptions, delays, or shutdowns, causing loss of critical data or the unauthorized access to personally identifiable information. If an actual or perceived breach of security occurs on our systems or a vendor's systems, we may face civil liability and reputational damage, either of which would negatively affect our ability to attract and retain listeners, which in turn would harm our efforts to attract and retain advertisers. We also would be required to expend significant resources to mitigate the breach of security and to address related matters. Unauthorized access to music or playlists would potentially create additional royalty obligations with no corresponding revenue.
We cannot control the actions of third parties who may have access to the listener data we collect. The integration of the Pandora service with apps provided by third parties represents a significant growth opportunity for us, but we may not be able to control such third parties' use of listeners' data, ensure their compliance with the terms of our privacy policies, or prevent unauthorized access to, or use or disclosure of, listener information, any of which could hinder or prevent our efforts with respect to growth opportunity. In addition, these third-party vendors may become the victim of security breaches, or have practices that may result in a breach and we may be responsible for those third-party acts or failures to act.
Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to maintain the security of data relating to our listeners and employees, to comply with our posted privacy policy, laws and regulations, rules of self-regulatory organizations, industry standards and contractual provisions to which we may be bound, could result in the loss of confidence in us, or result in actions against us by governmental entities or others, all of which could result in litigation and financial losses, and could potentially cause us to lose listeners, artists, advertisers, revenue and employees.
We are subject to a number of risks related to credit card and debit card payments we accept.
We accept subscription payments through credit and debit card transactions. For credit and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time. An increase in those fees would require us to either increase the prices we charge for our products, which could cause us to lose subscribers and subscription revenue, or absorb an increase in our operating expenses, either of which could harm our operating results.
If we or any of our processing vendors have problems with our billing software, or the billing software malfunctions, it could have an adverse effect on our subscriber satisfaction and could cause one or more of the major credit card companies to disallow our continued use of their payment products. In addition, if our billing software fails to work properly and, as a result, we do not automatically charge our subscribers’ credit cards on a timely basis or at all, or there are issues with financial insolvency of our third-party vendors or other unanticipated problems or events, we could lose subscription revenue, which would harm our operating results.
We are also subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it more difficult for us to comply. We are currently accredited against, and in compliance with, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, or PCI DSS, the payment card industry’s security standard for companies that collect, store or transmit certain data regarding credit and debit cards, credit and debit card holders and credit and debit card transactions. Currently we comply with PCI DSS version 2.0 as a Level 3 merchant. In our subsequent PCI DSS compliance cycle, we will comply against PCI DSS version 3.0 as a Level 2 merchant. Although Pandora is PCI DSS compliant, there is no guarantee that we will maintain PCI DSS compliance. Our failure to comply fully with PCI DSS in the future could violate payment card association operating rules, federal and state laws and regulations and the terms of our contracts with payment processors and merchant banks. Such failure to comply fully also could subject us to fines, penalties, damages and civil liability, and could result in the loss of our ability to accept credit and debit card payments. Further, there is no guarantee that PCI DSS compliance will prevent illegal or improper use of our payment systems or the theft, loss, or misuse of data pertaining to credit and debit cards, credit and debit card holders and credit and debit card transactions.
If we fail to adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions, we may face civil liability, diminished public perception of our security measures and significantly higher credit card-related costs, each of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable to maintain our chargeback rate or refund rates at acceptable levels, credit card and debit card companies may increase our transaction fees or terminate their relationships with us. Any increases in our credit card and debit card fees could adversely affect our results of operations, particularly if we elect not to raise our rates for our service to offset the increase. The termination of our ability to process payments on any major credit or debit card would significantly impair our ability to operate our business.
If we fail to detect click fraud or other invalid clicks on ads, we could lose the confidence of our advertisers, which would cause our business to suffer.
31
Our business relies on delivering positive results to our advertising customers. We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent and other invalid clicks or conversions that advertisers may perceive as undesirable. A major source of invalid clicks could result from click fraud where a listener intentionally clicks on ads for reasons other than to access the underlying content of the ads. If fraudulent or other malicious activity is perpetrated by others and we are unable to detect and prevent it, or if we choose to manage traffic quality in a way that advertisers find unsatisfactory, the affected advertisers may experience or perceive a reduced return on their investment in our advertising products, which could lead to dissatisfaction with our advertising programs, refusals to pay, refund demands or withdrawal of future business. This could damage our brand and lead to a loss of advertisers and revenue.
Some of our services and technologies may use "open source" software, which may restrict how we use or distribute our service or require that we release the source code of certain services subject to those licenses.
Some of our services and technologies may incorporate software licensed under so-called "open source" licenses, including, but not limited to, the GNU General Public License and the GNU Lesser General Public License. Such open source licenses typically require that source code subject to the license be made available to the public and that any modifications or derivative works to open source software continue to be licensed under open source licenses. Few courts have interpreted open source licenses, and the manner in which these licenses may be interpreted and enforced is therefore subject to some uncertainty. We rely on multiple employee and non-employee software programmers to design our proprietary technologies, and since we do not exercise complete control over the development efforts of all such programmers we cannot be certain that they have not incorporated open source software into our proprietary products and technologies or that they will not do so in the future. In the event that portions of our proprietary technology are determined to be subject to an open source license, we could be required to publicly release the affected portions of our source code, re-engineer all or a portion of our technologies, or otherwise be limited in the licensing of our technologies, each of which could reduce the value of our services and technologies and materially and adversely affect our ability to sustain and grow our business.
Government regulation of the internet is evolving, and unfavorable developments could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws specific to the internet. Such laws and regulations cover taxation, user privacy, data collection and protection, copyrights, electronic contracts, sales procedures, automatic subscription renewals, credit card processing procedures, consumer protections, broadband internet access and content restrictions. We cannot guarantee that we have been or will be fully compliant in every jurisdiction, as it is not entirely clear how existing laws and regulations governing issues such as privacy, taxation and consumer protection apply to the internet. Moreover, as internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal, state and foreign agencies becomes more likely. The adoption of any laws or regulations that adversely affect the popularity or growth in use of the internet, including laws limiting internet neutrality, could decrease listener demand for our service offerings and increase our cost of doing business. Future regulations, or changes in laws and regulations or their existing interpretations or applications, could also hinder our operational flexibility, raise compliance costs and result in additional historical or future liabilities for us, resulting in adverse impacts on our business and our operating results.
We could be adversely affected by regulatory restrictions on the use of mobile and other electronic devices in motor vehicles and legal claims arising from use of such devices while driving.
Regulatory and consumer agencies have increasingly focused on distraction to drivers that may be associated with use of mobile and other devices in motor vehicles. In 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation identified driver distraction as a top priority, and in April 2013, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (the "NHTSA") released new voluntary guidelines for visual-manual devices not related to the driving task that are integrated into motor vehicles. NHTSA also intends to propose guidelines applicable to after-market and portable devices that may be used in motor vehicles. Regulatory restrictions and enforcement actions related to how drivers and passengers in motor vehicles may engage with devices on which our service is broadcast could inhibit our ability to increase listener hours and generate ad revenue, which would harm our operating results. In addition, concerns over driver distraction due to use of mobile and other electronic devices to access our service in motor vehicles could result in product liability or personal injury litigation and negative publicity.
We rely on third parties to provide software and related services necessary for the operation of our business.
We incorporate and include third-party software into and with our apps and service offerings and expect to continue to do so. The operation of our apps and service offerings could be impaired if errors occur in the third-party software that we use. It may be more difficult for us to correct any defects in third-party software because the development and maintenance of the
32
software is not within our control. Accordingly, our business could be adversely affected in the event of any errors in this software. There can be no assurance that any third-party licensors will continue to make their software available to us on acceptable terms, to invest the appropriate levels of resources in their software to maintain and enhance its capabilities, or to remain in business. Any impairment in our relationship with these third-party licensors could harm our ability to maintain and expand the reach of our service, increase listener hours and sell advertising each of which could harm our operating results, cash flow and financial condition.
The impact of worldwide economic conditions, including the effect on advertising budgets and discretionary entertainment spending behavior, may adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our financial condition is affected by worldwide economic conditions and their impact on advertising spending. Expenditures by advertisers generally tend to reflect overall economic conditions, and reductions in spending by advertisers could have a serious adverse impact on our business. In addition, we provide an entertainment service, and payment for our Pandora One subscription service may be considered discretionary on the part of some of our current and prospective subscribers or listeners who may choose to use a competing free service or to listen to Pandora without subscribing. To the extent that overall economic conditions reduce spending on discretionary activities, our ability to retain current and obtain new subscribers could be hindered, which could reduce our subscription revenue and negatively impact our business.
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural catastrophic events and to interruption by man-made problems such as computer viruses or terrorism.
Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, fires, floods, power losses, telecommunications failures, terrorist attacks, acts of war, human errors, break-ins or similar events. For example, a significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or flood, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition, and our insurance coverage may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our principal executive offices are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. In addition, acts of terrorism could cause disruptions in our business or the economy as a whole. Our servers may also be vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems, which could lead to interruptions, delays, loss of critical data or the unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer data. We currently have very limited disaster recovery capability, and our business interruption insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. As we rely heavily on our servers, computer and communications systems and the internet to conduct our business and provide high quality service to our listeners, such disruptions could negatively impact our ability to run our business, result in loss of existing or potential listeners and advertisers and increased maintenance costs, which would adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock
Our stock price has been and will likely continue to be volatile, and the value of an investment in our common stock may decline.
The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. In addition to the risk factors described in this section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, factors that may cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate include, but are not limited to:
•our actual or anticipated operating performance and the operating performance of similar companies in the internet, radio or digital media spaces;
•our actual or anticipated achievement of non-financial key operating metrics;
•general economic conditions and their impact on advertising spending;
•the overall performance of the equity markets;
•the number of shares of our common stock publicly owned and available for trading;
•threatened or actual litigation;
•changes in laws or regulations relating to our service;
33
•any major change in our board of directors or management;
•publication of research reports about us or our industry or changes in recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities analysts; and
•sales or expected sales of shares of our common stock by us, and our officers, directors and significant stockholders.
In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those affected companies. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a company's securities. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, divert our management's attention and resources and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If securities or industry analysts cease publishing research, publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business or make projections that exceed our actual results, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If securities or industry analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline. Furthermore, such analysts publish their own projections regarding our actual results. These projections may vary widely from one another and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our stock price may decline if we fail to meet securities and industry analysts' projections.
Our charter documents, Delaware law and certain terms of our music licensing arrangements could discourage takeover attempts and lead to management entrenchment.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company. These provisions could also make it difficult for stockholders to elect directors that are not nominated by the current members of our board of directors or take other corporate actions, including effecting changes in our management. These provisions include:
•a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which could delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;
•no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;
•the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquiror;
•the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of our board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;
•a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;
•the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of our board of directors, our president, our secretary, or a majority vote of our board of directors, which could delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;
•the requirement for the affirmative vote of holders of at least 662/3% of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of the voting stock, voting together as a single class, to amend the provisions of our certificate of incorporation relating to the issuance of preferred stock and management of our business or our bylaws, which may inhibit the ability of an acquiror to effect such amendments to facilitate an unsolicited takeover attempt;
•the ability of our board of directors, by majority vote, to amend the bylaws, which may allow our board of directors to
34
take additional actions to prevent an unsolicited takeover and inhibit the ability of an acquiror to amend the bylaws to facilitate an unsolicited takeover attempt; and
•advance notice procedures with which stockholders must comply to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders' meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquiror's own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law governs us. These provisions may prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us for a certain period of time. In addition, if we are acquired, certain terms of our music licensing arrangements, including favorable royalty rates that currently apply to us, may not be available to an acquiror. These terms may discourage a potential acquiror from making an offer to buy us or may reduce the price such a party may be willing to offer.
35
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal executive offices are located in Oakland, California in an office building with 134,308 square-feet, under a lease expiring on September 30, 2020. We also lease regional offices in Chicago, Illinois; Santa Monica, California; and New York, New York and local sales offices at various locations throughout the United States and in Australia and New Zealand.
Our data centers are located in colocation facilities operated by Equinix in San Jose, California and Ashburn, Virginia as well as by Digital Realty Trust in Chicago, Illinois and are designed to be fault-tolerant and operate at maximum uptime. Backup systems in California and Virginia can be brought online in the event of a failure at the other data centers. These redundancies enable fault tolerance and will also support our continued growth.
The data centers host the Pandora.com website and intranet applications that are used to manage the website content. The websites are designed to be fault-tolerant, with a collection of identical web servers connecting to an enterprise database. The design also includes load balancers, firewalls and routers that connect the components and provide connections to the internet. The failure of any individual component is not expected to affect the overall availability of our website.
We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the near future and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available on commercially reasonable terms to accommodate our foreseeable future operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The material set forth in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
36
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on The New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "P." The following table sets forth the range of high and low intra-day sales prices per share of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the NYSE.
PRICE RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Our common stock has traded on the NYSE since June 15, 2011. Our initial public offering was priced at $16.00 per share on June 14, 2011.
High | Low | ||||||||
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2014 | |||||||||
First quarter (January 1, 2014 - March 31, 2014) | $ | 39.43 | $ | 26.76 | |||||
Second quarter (April 1, 2014 - June 30, 2014) | $ | 31.74 | $ | 22.17 | |||||
Third quarter (July 1, 2014 - September 30, 2014) | $ | 29.82 | $ | 24.16 | |||||
Fourth quarter (October 1, 2014 - December 31, 2014) | $ | 24.70 | $ | 16.90 | |||||
Eleven Months Ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||||
First quarter (February 1, 2013 - April 30, 2013) | $ | 14.27 | $ | 11.36 | |||||
Second quarter (May 1, 2013 - July 31, 2013) | $ | 20.52 | $ | 13.94 | |||||
Third quarter (August 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013) | $ | 28.17 | $ | 18.16 | |||||
Fourth quarter (November 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013) (1) | $ | 31.56 | $ | 25.67 | |||||
(1) The fourth quarter of calendar 2013 (11 months) included two months (November 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013) as a result of the change in our fiscal year-end. | |||||||||
On December 31, 2014, the closing price per share of our common stock as reported on the NYSE was $17.83. As of December 31, 2014, there were approximately 60 holders of record of our common stock. The number of beneficial stockholders is substantially greater than the number of holders of record because a large portion of our common stock is held through brokerage firms.
Dividend Policy
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Instead, we intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Any future determination relating to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects, applicable Delaware law, which provides that dividends are only payable out of surplus or current net profits, and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. In addition, our credit facility restricts our ability to pay dividends. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Our Indebtedness-Credit Facility" and Note 8 to our financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
For equity compensation plan information refer to Item 12 in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
37
Stock Price Performance Graph
This performance graph shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
The following graph shows a comparison from June 15, 2011, the date our common stock commenced trading on the NYSE, through December 31, 2014 of the total cumulative return of our common stock with the total cumulative return of the New York Stock Exchange Composite Index (the "NYA Composite"), the Global X Social Media Index (the "SOCL") and the SPDR Morgan Stanley Technology MTK Index (the "MTK"). The figures represented below assume an investment of $100 in our common stock at the closing price of $17.42 on June 15, 2011 and in the NYA Composite and MTK on the same date. The SOCL was modeled from the inception of the index on November 15, 2011. Data for the NYA Composite, MTK and SOCL assume reinvestment of dividends. The comparisons in the graph are historical and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return Among Pandora Media, Inc.,
New York Stock Exchange Composite Index, Global X Social Media Index and
SPDR Morgan Stanley Technology MTK Index
38
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report. The consolidated statement of operations data for the twelve months ended January 31, 2011 and 2012 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of January 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. The consolidated statements of operations data for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, for the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 and 2014 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this report. The consolidated statement of operations data for the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 is unaudited. Our unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and include, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information set forth in those statements included elsewhere in this report.
The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods.
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 137,764 | $ | 274,340 | $ | 427,145 | $ | 389,484 | $ | 600,233 | $ | 920,802 | |||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | (11,042 | ) | (19,865 | ) | (38,148 | ) | (24,462 | ) | (27,017 | ) | (30,406 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted | (1.03 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.23 | ) | (0.15 | ) | (0.15 | ) | (0.15 | ) | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | 10,761 | 105,955 | 168,294 | 167,956 | 180,968 | 205,273 | |||||||||||||||||
Key Metrics (unaudited):(1)
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
(in billions) | |||||||||||||||||
Listener hours | 3.83 | 8.23 | 14.01 | 12.56 | 15.31 | 20.03 | |||||||||||
As of January 31, | As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||||||||
Active users | 29.3 | 47.6 | 65.6 | 76.2 | 81.5 | ||||||||||
(1) Listener hours and active users are defined in the section entitled "Key Metrics" in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |||||||||||||||
39
As of January 31, | As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 43,048 | $ | 44,126 | $ | 65,725 | $ | 245,755 | $ | 175,957 | |||||||||
Working capital | 36,715 | 89,218 | 82,644 | 362,777 | 439,254 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | 99,209 | 178,015 | 218,832 | 673,335 | 749,290 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term liabilities | 3,496 | 2,568 | 3,873 | 9,098 | 16,773 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock warrant liability | 1,027 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Convertible preferred stock | 126,662 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital | 2,309 | 205,971 | 238,569 | 675,123 | 781,030 | ||||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) | (83,010 | ) | 104,540 | 98,989 | 508,231 | 583,357 | |||||||||||||
40
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this report, particularly in the sections entitled "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry Data" and "Risk Factors."
We changed our fiscal year from the twelve months ending January 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2013. As a result of this change, our prior fiscal year was an eleven-month transition period ended on December 31, 2013.
In this MD&A, when financial results for the 2014 annual period are compared to financial results for the prior year period, the results compare the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014 and the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2013. When financial results for the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2013 are compared to financial results for the prior year period, the results compare the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2013 and the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2012. The results for the eleven month period ended December 31, 2012 are unaudited. The following tables show the months included within the various comparison periods in our MD&A:
Calendar 2014 (12-month) Results Compared With Calendar 2013 (11-month) | ||
Calendar 2013 (11-month) | Calendar 2014 (12-month) | |
February 2013 - December 2013 | January 2014 - December 2014 | |
Calendar 2013 (11-month) Results Compared With Calendar 2012 (11-month recast, unaudited) | ||
Calendar 2012 (11-month recast, unaudited) | Calendar 2013 (11-month) | |
February 2012 - December 2012 | February 2013 - December 2013 | |
Overview
Pandora is the leader in internet radio in the United States, offering a personalized experience for each of our listeners wherever and whenever they want to listen to radio on a wide range of smartphones, tablets, computers and car audio systems, as well as a range of other internet-connected devices. The majority of our listener hours occur on mobile devices, with the majority of our revenue generated from advertising on these devices. We have pioneered a new form of radio—one that uses intrinsic qualities of music to initially create stations and then adapts playlists in real-time based on the individual feedback of each listener. We offer local and national advertisers an opportunity to deliver targeted messages to our listeners using a combination of audio, display and video advertisements.
As of December 31, 2014, we had more than 250 million registered users, which we define as the total number of accounts that have been created for our service at period end. As of December 31, 2014, more than 225 million registered users had accessed Pandora through smartphones and tablets. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we streamed 20.03 billion hours of internet radio, and as of December 31, 2014, we had 81.5 million active users during the prior 30 day period. Since we launched our free, advertising-supported radio service in 2005 our listeners have created over 7 billion stations.
At the core of our service is our set of proprietary personalization technologies, including the Music Genome Project and our playlist generating algorithms. The Music Genome Project is a database of over 1,000,000 uniquely analyzed songs from over 125,000 artists, spanning over 600 genres and sub-genres, which we develop one song at a time by evaluating and cataloging each song’s particular attributes. When a listener enters a single song, artist, comedian or genre to start a station, the Pandora service instantly generates a station that plays music we think that listener will enjoy. Based on listener reactions to the songs we pick, we further tailor the station to match the listener's preferences. Listeners also have the ability to add variety to and rename stations, which further allows for the personalization of our service.
We currently provide the Pandora service through two models:
41
• | Free Service. Our free service is advertising-based and allows listeners access to our music and comedy catalogs and personalized playlist generating system for free across all of our delivery platforms. |
• | Pandora One. Pandora One is a paid subscription service without any advertising. Pandora One also enables listeners to have more daily skips, enjoy higher quality audio on supported devices and enjoy longer timeout-free listening. |
A key element of our strategy is to make the Pandora service available everywhere that there is internet connectivity. To this end, we make the Pandora service available through a variety of distribution channels. In addition to streaming our service to computers, we have developed Pandora mobile device applications (“apps”) for smartphones such as iPhone, Android and the Windows Phone and for tablets including the iPad and Android tablets. We distribute those mobile apps free to listeners via app stores. In addition, Pandora is now integrated with more than 1,000 connected devices, including automobiles, automotive aftermarket devices and consumer electronic devices.
Recent Events
In August 2014, we announced an agreement to partner with Music and Entertainment Rights Licensing Independent Network ("Merlin"), the global rights agency for the independent label sector. This partnership is designed to help independent labels and artists increase the audiences they reach. Participating labels, and the artists they represent, can also take advantage of the marketing capabilities of our connected platform by obtaining direct access to our metadata to help make data-driven business decisions. We do not expect this partnership to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or operating results.
In July 2014, we signed a multi-year agreement with BMG Rights Management US LLC (“BMG”) for a U.S. license for BMG's complete Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) and American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”) catalog of musical works. We do not expect this agreement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or operating results.
Effective in March 2014, we implemented a change in the pricing structure for Pandora One under which the $36 annual subscription option was eliminated. In addition, effective in May 2014, the monthly pricing option for Pandora One was increased to $4.99 per-month for new subscribers. Existing monthly subscribers who did not lapse maintained the $3.99 per-month pricing structure, and existing annual subscribers who did not lapse were migrated to the $3.99 per-month monthly pricing structure. Effective in December 2014, we reinstated the annual subscription option at $54.89 per year.
An important element of our strategy to achieve greater penetration of the local radio advertising industry is to have Pandora’s audience data presented in a manner consistent with similar data on terrestrial radio stations so that advertisers and advertising agencies can better evaluate the relative value proposition of advertising on Pandora. In February 2014, Triton received Media Rating Council (“MRC”) accreditation for its Webcast Metrics Local (“WCML”) product, which allows agencies and advertisers to evaluate Pandora’s relative audience scale using broadcast metrics in specific advertising markets. Also in February 2014, we completed the WCML publisher audit of our user-declared geographic and demographic listener data. We believe this accreditation validates that our local audience metrics are reliable and effective.
Factors Affecting our Business Model
As our mobile listenership increases, we face new challenges in optimizing our advertising products for delivery on mobile and other connected device platforms and monetizing inventory generated by listeners using these platforms. The mobile digital advertising industry is at an early stage of development, with lower overall spending levels than traditional online advertising markets, and faces technical challenges due to fragmented platforms and a lack of standard audience measurement protocols. As a greater share of our listener hours is consumed on mobile devices, our ability to monetize increased mobile streaming may not achieve the levels of monetization of streaming we have achieved on computers.
In addition, our monetization strategy includes increasing the number of ad campaigns for computer, mobile and other connected device platforms sold to local advertisers, placing us in more direct competition with broadcast radio for advertiser spending, especially for audio advertisements. By contrast, historically our display advertisers have been predominantly national brands. To successfully monetize our growing listener hours, a key strategy is to convince a substantial base of local advertisers of the benefits of advertising on the Pandora service including demonstrating the effectiveness and relevance of our advertising products, and in particular, audio advertising products, across the range of our delivery platforms.
42
Growth in our active users and distribution platforms has fueled a corresponding growth in listener hours. Our total number of listener hours is a key driver for both revenue generation opportunities and content acquisition costs, which are the largest component of our expenses.
• | Revenue. Listener hours define the number of opportunities we have to sell advertisements, which we refer to as inventory. Our ability to attract advertisers depends in large part on our ability to offer sufficient inventory within desired demographics. In turn, our ability to generate revenue depends on the extent to which we are able to sell the inventory we have. |
• | Cost of Revenue—Content Acquisition Costs. The number of sound recordings we transmit to users of the Pandora service, as generally reflected by listener hours, drives substantially all of our content acquisition costs, although certain of our licensing agreements require us to pay fees for public performances of musical works based on a percentage of revenue. |
We pay content acquisition costs, or royalties, to the copyright owners, or their agents, of each sound recording that we stream and to the copyright owners, or their agents, for the sound recordings that we perform, as well as the musical works embodied in each of those sound recordings, subject to certain exclusions. Royalties for sound recordings are negotiated with and paid to record labels, rights organizations or to SoundExchange. Royalties for musical works are most often negotiated with and paid to performing rights organizations (“PROs") such as ASCAP, BMI and SESAC, Inc. (“SESAC”) or directly to publishing companies. Royalties are calculated based on the number of sound recordings streamed, revenue earned or other usage measures.
We stream spoken word comedy content pursuant to a federal statutory license, for which the underlying literary works are not currently entitled to eligibility for licensing by any PRO for the United States. Rather, pursuant to industry-wide custom and practice, this content is performed absent a specific license from any such PRO or the copyright owner of such content. However, we pay royalties to SoundExchange at rates negotiated between representatives of online music services and SoundExchange for the right to stream this spoken word comedy content.
In June 2013, we entered into a local marketing agreement to program KXMZ-FM, a Rapid City, South Dakota-area terrestrial radio station. In addition, we entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of KXMZ-FM for a total purchase price of approximately $0.6 million in cash, subject to certain closing conditions. These agreements were made in part to allow us to qualify for certain settlement agreements concerning royalties for the public performance of musical works between the Radio Music Licensing Committee (“RMLC”) and ASCAP and BMI. We believe that we qualify for the RMLC royalty rates, which have provided and will continue to provide us with savings of less than 1% of revenue in cost of revenue—content acquisition costs compared with the latest contractual rates.
As of December 31, 2014, we have paid $0.4 million of the purchase price, which is included in the other long-term assets line item of our balance sheets. Completion of the KXMZ-FM acquisition is subject to various closing conditions. These include, but are not limited to, regulatory approval by the Federal Communications Commission. Upon completion of these conditions, we expect to account for this transaction as a business combination.
Given the current royalty structures in effect through the end of 2015 with respect to the public performance of sound recordings in the United States, our content acquisition costs increase with each additional listener hour, regardless of whether we are able to generate more revenue. As such, our ability to achieve and sustain profitability and operating leverage depends on our ability to increase our revenue per hour of streaming through increased advertising revenue across all of our delivery platforms.
In March 2013, we instituted a 40 hour per month listening limit for our advertising supported service on certain mobile and other connected devices. Listeners who reached this limit could continue to use our ad supported service on these devices by paying $0.99 for the remainder of the month, could listen to our ad supported service on their computers, or could purchase Pandora One annual subscriptions for $36 per year or monthly subscriptions for $4 per month, which were the rates then in effect. Effective September 2013, we eliminated this limit primarily due to our improved ability to monetize mobile listener hours. Although we have removed the broad 40 hour per month mobile listening limit, we have implemented other more precise measures that we believe will allow us to better manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience, such as adjusting the number of times users can skip songs during a given listening session, as well as optimizing time-based thresholds whereby music will stop playing after a certain length of user inactivity with the service.
43
We expect to invest heavily in our operations to support anticipated future growth. One of our key objectives is furthering our industry leadership in internet radio, which we believe will strengthen our brand and help us to convince advertisers to allocate spending towards our ad products. As such, a central focus is adding, retaining and engaging listeners to build market share and grow our listener hours. As our business matures, we expect that our revenue growth will exceed the growth in our listener hours. However, we expect to incur annual net losses on a U.S. GAAP basis in the near term because our current strategy is to leverage improvements in gross profit by investing in broadening distribution channels, developing innovative and scalable advertising products, increasing utilization of advertising inventory and building our sales force. These investments are intended to drive further growth in our business through both increased listener hours and monetization of those hours, and as a result we are targeting gradual improvements in gross profit over time. Our planned reinvestment of the resulting incremental gross profit will continue to depress the growth of our bottom line profitability.
Key Metrics
Listener Hours
We track listener hours because it is a key indicator of the growth of our business. We calculate listener hours based on the total bytes served for each track that is requested and served from our servers, as measured by our internal analytics systems, whether or not a listener listens to the entire track. To the extent that third-party measurements of listener hours are not calculated using a similar server-based approach, the third-party measurements may differ from our measurements.
The table below sets forth our total listener hours for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||
(in billions) | |||||||||||
Listener hours | 14.01 | 12.56 | 15.31 | 20.03 | |||||||
Active Users
We track the number of active users as an additional indicator of the breadth of audience we are reaching at a given time. Active users are defined as the number of distinct registered users, including subscribers, that have requested audio from our servers within the trailing 30 days to the end of the final calendar month of the period. The number of active users may overstate the number of unique individuals who actively use our service within a month as one individual may register for, and use, multiple accounts.
The table below sets forth our total active users as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.
As of December 31, | |||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||
(in millions) | |||||
Active users | 76.2 | 81.5 | |||
Advertising-based active users (“ad-based active users”) are defined as the number of users, excluding subscribers, that have requested audio from our servers within the trailing 30 days to the end of the final calendar month of the period. Subscribers are defined as the number of distinct users at the end of the period that have subscribed to our service. Inactive subscribers are included as they contribute towards revenue per thousand listener hours (“RPMs”), which are described in further detail below.
The table below sets forth our users on an advertising and subscription basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.
44
As of December 31, | |||
2013 | 2014 | ||
User type | Users (in millions) | ||
Ad-based active users | 73.4 | 78.5 | |
Subscribers* | 3.3 | 3.6 | |
Total | 76.7 | 82.1 | |
* Includes subscribers that have not used our service within the trailing 30 days to the end of the final calendar month of the period. | |||
The table below sets forth our listener hours on an advertising and subscription basis for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||
User type | Listener hours (in billions) | ||||||
Ad-based active users | 12.88 | 11.55 | 13.34 | 17.58 | |||
Subscribers | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.97 | 2.45 | |||
Total | 14.01 | 12.56 | 15.31 | 20.03 | |||
Advertising Revenue per Thousand Listener Hours (“ad RPMs”)
We track ad RPMs for our free, advertising-supported service because it is a key indicator of our ability to monetize advertising inventory created by our listener hours. We focus on ad RPMs across all of our delivery platforms. We believe ad RPMs to be the central top-line indicator for evaluating the results of our monetization efforts. Ad RPMs are calculated by dividing advertising revenue by the number of thousands of listener hours of our advertising-based service.
Subscription and Other Revenue per Thousand Listener Hours (“subscription RPMs”)
We track subscription RPMs because it is a key indicator of the performance of our subscription service. We focus on subscription RPMs across all of our delivery platforms. Subscription RPMs are calculated by dividing subscription and other revenue by the number of thousands of listener hours of our subscription service.
Total Revenue per Thousand Listener Hours (“total RPMs”)
We track total RPMs for our service, which includes ad and subscription RPMs, because it is a key indicator of our ability to monetize our listener hours. Total RPMs compare advertising and subscription and other revenue in a given period to total listener hours in the period. We calculate total RPMs by dividing the total revenue by the number of thousands of listener hours.
Licensing Costs per Thousand Listener Hours (“LPMs”)
We track LPMs and analyze them in combination with our analysis of RPMs as they provide a key indicator of our profitability. LPMs are relatively fixed licensing costs with scheduled annual rate increases that drive period-over-period changes in LPMs. As such, the margin on our business varies principally with variances in ad RPMs and subscription RPMs.
Estimated RPMs and LPMs by Platform
We also provide estimates of disaggregated ad RPMs, subscription RPMs, total RPMs and related LPMs for our computer platform as well as our mobile and other connected devices platforms, which we calculate by dividing the estimated revenue and costs generated through the respective platforms by the number of thousands of listener hours of our services delivered through such platforms. While we believe that such disaggregated data provides directional insight for evaluating our efforts to monetize our service, we do not validate such disaggregated data to the level of financial statement reporting. Such data should be seen as indicative only and as management's best estimate.
45
Period-to-period results should not be regarded as precise nor can they be relied upon as indicative of results for future periods. In addition, as our business matures and in response to technological evolutions, we anticipate that the relevant indicators we monitor for evaluating our business may change.
The table below sets forth our RPMs and LPMs, including total, computer and mobile and other connected devices, on an advertising (“ad”), subscription and total basis for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
RPM | LPM* | RPM | LPM* | RPM | LPM* | RPM | LPM* | |||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer | $ | 53.73 | $ | 18.11 | $ | 54.51 | $ | 17.98 | $ | 56.79 | $ | 18.94 | $ | 62.00 | $ | 20.76 | ||||||||||||
Mobile and other connected devices | 22.53 | 17.35 | 22.80 | 17.17 | 31.97 | 18.63 | 37.84 | 20.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total advertising | $ | 29.13 | $ | 17.51 | $ | 29.60 | $ | 17.35 | $ | 36.70 | $ | 18.69 | $ | 41.66 | $ | 20.31 | ||||||||||||
Subscription | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer | $ | 45.52 | $ | 29.74 | $ | 45.39 | $ | 29.49 | $ | 52.38 | $ | 31.83 | $ | 60.56 | $ | 33.37 | ||||||||||||
Mobile and other connected devices | 46.52 | 29.03 | 45.77 | 28.72 | 57.77 | 33.87 | 82.25 | 37.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total subscription | $ | 46.03 | $ | 29.37 | $ | 45.59 | $ | 29.10 | $ | 56.27 | $ | 33.30 | $ | 76.89 | $ | 36.41 | ||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total computer | $ | 52.36 | $ | 20.05 | $ | 52.98 | $ | 19.90 | $ | 56.01 | $ | 21.23 | $ | 61.74 | $ | 23.02 | ||||||||||||
Total mobile and other connected devices | 23.83 | 17.98 | 24.03 | 17.79 | 34.98 | 20.41 | 42.77 | 22.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 30.49 | $ | 18.47 | $ | 30.88 | $ | 18.30 | $ | 39.22 | $ | 20.57 | $ | 45.97 | $ | 22.28 | ||||||||||||
* Under the Pureplay Settlement, we pay per-performance rates for the streaming of sound recordings for our Pandora One subscription service that are higher than the per-performance rates for our free, advertising-supported service. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total ad RPMs
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, total ad RPMs increased primarily due to an increase in ad RPMs on the mobile and other connected devices platform. Ad RPMs on the mobile and other connected devices platform increased as advertising revenue growth outpaced the growth in advertising listener hours as a result of an increase in the average price per ad sold on that platform, due in part to our increase in relative volume of local ad sales.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, total ad RPMs increased compared to the respective prior year period as advertising sales growth outpaced the growth in advertising-supported listener hours primarily due to an increase in the number of ads delivered, as well as an increase in the average price per ad. In addition, total ad RPMs benefited from measures we implemented in 2013 to better manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience.
Total subscription RPMs
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, total subscription RPMs increased as the growth in subscription and other revenue outpaced the growth in subscription listener hours on both the computer and the mobile and other connected devices platforms, primarily due to an increase in the average price per subscriber as a result of the increase in the Pandora One pricing structure. In addition, the changes in subscription RPMs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 reflect a $14.2 million increase in subscription revenue in connection with the one-time recognition of the accumulation of deferred revenue related to certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores. Refer to “Deferred Revenue” below for further details regarding these mobile subscriptions.
46
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, total subscription RPMs increased as the growth in subscription and other revenue outpaced the growth in subscription listener hours on both the computer and the mobile and other connected devices platforms.
Total ad LPMs
Total ad LPMs in the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 increased primarily due to scheduled rate increases for sound recording royalties paid to SoundExchange.
Total ad LPMs in the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012 increased primarily due to scheduled rate increases for sound recording royalties paid to SoundExchange.
Total subscription LPMs
Total subscription LPMs in the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 increased primarily due to scheduled rate increases for sound recording royalties paid to SoundExchange.
Total subscription LPMs in the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012 increased primarily due to scheduled rate increases for sound recording royalties paid to SoundExchange.
47
Basis of Presentation and Results of Operations
The following table presents our results of operations for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenue. The period-to-period comparisons of results are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods.
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||
Advertising | 88 | % | 88 | % | 82 | % | 80 | % | |||
Subscription and other | 12 | 12 | 18 | 20 | |||||||
Total revenue | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Cost of revenue | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Content acquisition costs | 61 | 59 | 52 | 48 | |||||||
Cost of revenue—Other(1) | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |||||||
Total cost of revenue | 68 | 67 | 59 | 55 | |||||||
Gross profit | 32 | 33 | 41 | 45 | |||||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||
Product development(1) | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||||||
Sales and marketing(1) | 25 | 24 | 28 | 30 | |||||||
General and administrative(1) | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
Total operating expenses | 41 | 39 | 45 | 48 | |||||||
Loss from operations | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||
Other income (expense), net | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||
Provision for income taxes | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Net loss | (9 | )% | (6 | )% | (5 | )% | (3 | )% | |||
(1) Includes stock-based compensation as follows: | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Other | 0.3 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.5 | % | |||
Product development | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | |||||||
Sales and marketing | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 | |||||||
General and administrative | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.5 | |||||||
Note: Amounts may not recalculate due to rounding | |||||||||||
Revenue
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising | $ | 343,318 | $ | 489,340 | $ | 146,022 | $ | 489,340 | $ | 732,338 | $ | 242,998 | |||||||||||
Subscription and other | 46,166 | 110,893 | 64,727 | 110,893 | 188,464 | 77,571 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 389,484 | $ | 600,233 | $ | 210,749 | $ | 600,233 | $ | 920,802 | $ | 320,569 | |||||||||||
Advertising revenue
48
We generate advertising revenue primarily from audio, display and video advertising, which is typically sold on a cost-per-thousand impressions, or CPM, basis. Advertising campaigns typically range from one to twelve months, and advertisers generally pay us based on the number of delivered impressions or the satisfaction of other criteria, such as click-throughs. We also have arrangements with advertising agencies under which these agencies sell advertising inventory on our service directly to advertisers. We report revenue under these arrangements net of amounts due to agencies. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, advertising revenue accounted for 88%, 88%, 82% and 80%, of our total revenue, respectively. We expect that advertising will comprise a substantial majority of revenue for the foreseeable future.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, advertising revenue increased $243.0 million or 50%, primarily due to an approximate 25% increase in the average price per ad sold, due in part to our increase in relative volume of local ad sales and our focus on monetizing mobile inventory, and an approximate 15% increase in the number of ads sold, primarily due to an increase in advertising listener hours. In addition, the remaining increase in advertising revenue was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, advertising revenue increased by $146.0 million or 43%, primarily due to an approximate 30% increase in the number of ads delivered, as well as an increase in the average price per ad of approximately 10%. The increase in the number of ads delivered was primarily due to an increase in total advertising listener hours of approximately 15%, which increased the volume of advertising inventory, as well as an increase in our sales force year-over-year to sell such advertising inventory and an increase in ad capacity per hour of approximately 10%. The increase in the average price per ad was due primarily to changes in the sales distribution mix amongst direct sales, third-party network sales, and other channels and the platform mix between computer and mobile and other connected devices.
Subscription and other revenue
Subscription and other revenue is generated primarily through the sale of Pandora One, a premium version of the Pandora service, which currently includes advertisement-free access and higher audio quality on the devices that support it. Subscription revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the subscription period. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, subscription and other revenue accounted for 12%, 12%, 18% and 20% of our total revenue, respectively.
Effective in March 2014, we implemented a change in the pricing structure for Pandora One under which the $36 annual subscription option was eliminated. In addition, effective in May 2014, the monthly pricing option for Pandora One was increased to $4.99 per-month for new subscribers. Existing monthly subscribers who did not lapse maintained the $3.99 per-month pricing structure, and existing annual subscribers who did not lapse were migrated to the $3.99 per-month monthly pricing structure. Effective in December 2014, we reinstated the annual subscription option at $54.89 per year.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, subscription revenue increased $77.6 million or 70%, primarily due to an approximate 25% increase in the average price per subscription as a result of the change in the Pandora One pricing structure and due to an approximate 10% increase in the number of subscribers. The increase in subscription revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was also due to a $14.2 million increase in subscription revenue in connection with the one-time recognition of the accumulation of deferred revenue related to certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores. Refer to “Deferred Revenue” below for further details regarding these mobile subscriptions. In addition, the remaining increase in subscription revenue was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, subscription and other revenue increased by $64.7 million, or 140%, due to an increase in the number of subscribers, partially driven by the implementation of the mobile listening limit, which was implemented in March 2013 and eliminated in September 2013.
Deferred revenue
Our deferred revenue consists principally of both prepaid but unrecognized subscription revenue and advertising fees received or billed in advance of the delivery or completion of the delivery of services. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when the services are provided and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
49
In addition, subscription revenue derived from sales through certain mobile devices may be subject to refund or cancellation terms which may affect the timing or amount of the subscription revenue recognition. When refund rights exist, we recognize revenue when services have been provided and the rights lapse or when we have developed sufficient transaction history to estimate a return reserve.
We were required to defer revenue for certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores that contained refund rights until the refund rights lapsed or until we developed sufficient operating history to estimate a return reserve. As of December 31, 2013, we had deferred all revenue related to these mobile subscriptions subject to refund rights totaling approximately $14.2 million, as we did not have sufficient transaction history to estimate a return reserve. Beginning in January 2014, we had sufficient transaction history that enabled us to estimate future returns. Accordingly, in January 2014, we began recording revenue related to these mobile subscriptions net of estimated returns. This resulted in a one-time increase in subscription revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2014 of approximately $14.2 million, as the previously deferred revenue was recognized. As of December 31, 2014, the deferred revenue related to the return reserve was not significant.
Deferred revenue in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 decreased as compared to December 31, 2013 in connection with the one-time recognition of the accumulation of deferred revenue related to certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores in the three months ended March 31, 2014. In addition, deferred revenue also decreased due to the elimination of the annual pricing option from March through December 2014, as we collected less cash upfront under the one-month subscription period as opposed to the twelve-month subscription period under the annual subscription option.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of revenue consists of cost of revenue—content acquisition costs and cost of revenue—other. Our operating expenses consist of product development, sales and marketing and general and administrative costs. Cost of revenue—content acquisition costs are the most significant component of our costs and expenses, followed by employee-related costs, which include stock-based compensation expenses. We expect to continue to hire additional employees in order to support our anticipated growth and our product development initiatives. In any particular period, the timing of additional hires could materially affect our cost of revenue and operating expenses, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue. We anticipate that our costs and expenses will increase in the future.
Cost of revenue—Content acquisition costs
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Content acquisition costs | $ | 230,731 | $ | 314,866 | $ | 84,135 | $ | 314,866 | $ | 446,377 | $ | 131,511 | |||||||||||
Content acquisition costs as a percentage of advertising revenue by platform
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||
Computer | 35 | % | 34 | % | 34 | % | 34 | % | |||
Mobile and other connected devices | 76 | % | 75 | % | 58 | % | 53 | % | |||
Cost of revenue—Content acquisition costs principally consist of royalties paid for streaming music or other content to our listeners. Royalties are currently calculated using negotiated rates documented in agreements. The majority of our royalties are payable based on a fee per public performance of a sound recording, while in other cases our royalties are payable based on a percentage of our revenue or a formula that involves a combination of per performance and revenue metrics. For royalty arrangements under negotiation, we accrue for estimated royalties based on the available facts and circumstances and adjust these estimates as more information becomes available. The results of any finalized negotiation may be materially different from our estimates.
50
We estimate our advertising-based content acquisition costs attributable to specific platforms by allocating costs from royalties payable based on a fee per track to the platform for which the track is served and by allocating costs from royalties based on a percentage of our revenue in accordance with the overall percentage of our revenue estimated to be attributable to such platforms. While we believe that comparing disaggregated content acquisition costs and revenues across our delivery platforms may provide directional insight for evaluating our efforts to monetize the rapid adoption of our service on mobile and other connected devices, we do not validate such disaggregated metrics to the level of financial statement reporting. We continue to refine our systems and methodologies used to categorize such metrics across our delivery platforms and the period-to-period comparisons of results are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, content acquisition costs increased $131.5 million or 42%, primarily due to an approximate 20% increase in listener hours and scheduled royalty rate increases of 8%. In addition, the remaining increase in content acquisition costs was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013. Content acquisition costs as a percentage of total revenue decreased from 52% to 48%, primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue and a $14.2 million increase in subscription revenue in connection with the one-time recognition of the accumulation of deferred revenue related to certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores. Refer to “Deferred Revenue” above for further details regarding these mobile subscriptions. Estimated content acquisition costs as a percentage of the advertising revenue attributable to our computer platform were 34% in both the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue on the computer platform as a result of an increase in the average price per ad sold, offset by scheduled rate increases. Estimated content acquisition costs as a percentage of the advertising revenue attributable to our mobile and other connected devices platform decreased from 58% to 53%, primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue on the mobile and other connected devices platform as a result of an increase in the average price per ad sold and an increase in the number of ads sold. The decrease in estimated content acquisition costs as a percentage of the advertising revenue attributable to our mobile and other connected devices platform was also due to the effect of measures we have adopted to manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience, such as adjusting the number of times users can skip songs during a given listening session, as well as optimizing time-based thresholds whereby music will stop playing after a certain length of user inactivity with the service, partially offset by scheduled rate increases.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, content acquisition costs increased by $84.1 million or 36%, due to increased listener hours, higher royalty rates due to scheduled rate increases and increased revenue. Content acquisition costs as a percentage of total revenue decreased from 59% to 52%, primarily due to an increase in advertising sales and the effect of measures we have adopted to manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience, partially offset by scheduled rate increases. Estimated content acquisition costs as a percentage of the advertising revenue attributable to our computer platform were 34% in both the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, primarily due to increases in advertising sales on that platform that were offset by scheduled rate increases. Estimated content acquisition costs as a percentage of the advertising revenue attributable to our mobile and other connected devices platforms decreased from 75% to 58%, primarily due to an increase in advertising sales on those platforms and the effect of measures we have adopted to manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience, partially offset by scheduled rate increases.
Cost of revenue—Other
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Other | $ | 28,988 | $ | 42,217 | $ | 13,229 | $ | 42,217 | $ | 61,627 | $ | 19,410 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Other consists primarily of hosting and ad serving costs, employee-related costs and other costs of ad sales. Hosting and ad serving costs consist of content streaming, maintaining our internet radio service and creating and serving advertisements through third-party ad servers. We make payments to third-party ad servers for the period the advertising impressions are delivered or click-through actions occur, and accordingly, we record this as a cost of revenue in the related period. Employee-related costs include salaries and benefits associated with supporting hosting and ad serving functions. Other costs of ad sales include costs related to music events that are sold as part of advertising arrangements.
51
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, cost of revenue—other increased $19.4 million or 46%, primarily due to a $5.6 million increase in employee-related costs and a $1.7 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were driven by an approximate 20% increase in headcount, a $4.2 million increase in ad serving and hosting costs driven by an increase in listener hours and a $2.3 million increase in other costs of ad sales related to events sold as part of advertising arrangements. In addition, the remaining increase in cost of revenue—other was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, cost of revenue—other increased by $13.2 million or 46%, primarily due to an $8.5 million increase in ad serving costs and hosting costs driven by an increase in advertising revenue and listener hours, a $2.8 million increase in employee-related costs and a $2.2 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were driven by an increase in headcount.
Gross profit
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 389,484 | $ | 600,233 | $ | 210,749 | $ | 600,233 | $ | 920,802 | $ | 320,569 | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 259,719 | 357,083 | 97,364 | 357,083 | 508,004 | 150,921 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 129,765 | $ | 243,150 | $ | 113,385 | $ | 243,150 | $ | 412,798 | $ | 169,648 | |||||||||||
Gross margin | 33 | % | 41 | % | 41 | % | 45 | % | |||||||||||||||
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, gross profit increased by $169.6 million or 70%, primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue as a result of an increase in the average price per ad sold and an increase in the number of ads sold. In addition, the remaining increase in gross profit was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013. Gross margin increased from 41% to 45% as the growth in revenue outpaced the growth in content acquisition costs primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue and the effect of measures we have adopted to manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience, such as adjusting the number of times users can skip songs during a given listening session, as well as optimizing time-based thresholds whereby music will stop playing after a certain length of user inactivity with the service. The increase in gross margin was also due to an increase in subscription and other revenue driven by a $14.2 million increase in connection with the one-time recognition of the accumulation of deferred revenue related to certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores. Refer to “Deferred Revenue” above for further details regarding these mobile subscriptions.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, gross profit increased by $113.4 million or 87%, primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue as a result of an increase in the number of ads delivered. Gross margin increased from 33% to 41% as the growth in advertising revenue outpaced the growth in content acquisition costs primarily due to an increase in the number of ads delivered and the effect of the measures we adopted to manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs.
Product development
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Product development | $ | 16,901 | $ | 31,294 | $ | 14,393 | $ | 31,294 | $ | 53,153 | $ | 21,859 | |||||||||||
Product development consists primarily of employee-related costs, including salaries and benefits related to employees in software engineering, music analysis and product management departments, facilities-related expenses, information technology and costs associated with supporting consumer connected-device manufacturers in implementing our service in their products.
52
We incur product development expenses primarily for improvements to our website and the Pandora app, development of new advertising products and development and enhancement of our personalized station generating system. We have generally expensed product development as incurred. Certain website development and internal use software development costs are capitalized when specific criteria are met. In such cases, the capitalized amounts are amortized over the useful life of the related application once the application is placed in service. We intend to continue making significant investments in developing new products and enhancing the functionality of our existing products.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, product development expenses increased $21.9 million or 70%, primarily due to a $17.0 million increase in employee-related costs and a $1.1 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were driven by an approximate 35% increase in headcount. In addition, the remaining increase in product development expenses was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, product development expenses increased by $14.4 million or 85%, primarily due to a $13.2 million increase in employee-related costs and a $1.3 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were driven by an increase in headcount.
Sales and marketing
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 94,212 | $ | 169,005 | $ | 74,793 | $ | 169,005 | $ | 277,330 | $ | 108,325 | |||||||||||
Sales and marketing consists primarily of employee-related costs, including salaries, commissions and benefits related to employees in sales, sales support and marketing departments. In addition, sales and marketing expenses include transaction processing commissions on subscription purchases through mobile app stores, external sales and marketing expenses such as brand marketing and customer acquisition costs, public relations expenses, costs related to music events, agency platform and media measurement expenses, facilities-related expenses and infrastructure costs. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase as we hire additional personnel to build out our sales and sales support teams, particularly as we continue to build out our local market sales team. While we have historically relied on the success of viral marketing to expand consumer awareness of our service, in 2014 we began to launch marketing campaigns to increase consumer awareness and expand our listener base. We anticipate that we will continue to utilize these types of marketing campaigns in the future.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, sales and marketing expenses increased $108.3 million or 64%, primarily due to a $61.0 million increase in employee-related costs and a $3.5 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were driven by an approximate 30% increase in headcount, a $10.3 million increase in brand marketing and customer acquisition costs, a $9.0 million increase in transaction processing commissions on subscription purchases through mobile app stores, a $2.3 million increase in agency platform and media measurement expenses, a $1.9 million increase in music events expenses and a $1.2 million increase in public relations expenses. In addition, the remaining increase in sales and marketing expenses was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, sales and marketing expenses increased by $74.8 million or 79%, primarily due to a $44.9 million increase in employee-related costs and a $5.0 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were primarily driven by an increase in headcount, a $16.1 million increase in transaction processing fees for subscription purchases through mobile app stores and a $9.1 million increase in marketing expenses.
General and administrative
Eleven months ended December 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | $ Change | 2013 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 42,716 | $ | 69,300 | $ | 26,584 | $ | 69,300 | $ | 112,443 | $ | 43,143 | |||||||||||
53
General and administrative consists primarily of employee-related costs, including salaries and benefits for finance, accounting, legal, internal information technology and other administrative personnel. In addition, general and administrative expenses include professional services costs for outside legal and accounting services, facilities-related expenses, infrastructure costs and credit card fees. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in future periods as we continue to invest in corporate infrastructure, including adding personnel and systems to our administrative functions.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, general and administrative expenses increased $43.1 million or 62%, primarily due to a $23.1 million increase in employee-related costs and a $3.3 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were driven by an approximate 40% increase in headcount, a $5.5 million increase in professional services costs primarily due to royalty-related legal matters, a $1.2 million increase in credit card fees and a $1.0 million increase in infrastructure costs. In addition, the remaining increase in general and administrative expenses was due to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 having one additional month as compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012, general and administrative expenses increased by $26.6 million or 62%, primarily due to an $11.7 million increase in professional fees, a $10.5 million increase in employee-related costs and a $2.1 million increase in facilities and equipment expenses, both of which were primarily driven by an increase in headcount.
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
We have historically been subject to income taxes only in the United States. As we expand our operations outside the United States, we become subject to taxation based on the foreign statutory rates and our effective tax rate could fluctuate accordingly.
Our provision for (benefit from) income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted statutory income tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2014, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments totaling $458.8 million, which consisted of cash and money market funds held at major financial institutions, commercial paper, investment-grade corporate debt securities and U.S. government and government agency debt securities.
In September 2013, we completed a follow-on public equity offering in which we sold an aggregate of 15,730,000 shares of our common stock, inclusive of 2,730,000 shares sold pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of an option to purchase additional shares, at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. In addition, another 5,200,000 shares were sold by certain selling stockholders. We received aggregate net proceeds of $378.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses from sales of our shares in the offering. We did not receive any of the proceeds from the sales of shares by the selling stockholders.
Our principal uses of cash during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 were funding our operations, as described below, and capital expenditures.
Sources of Funds
We believe, based on our current operating plan, that our existing cash and cash equivalents and available borrowings under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months.
From time to time, we may explore additional financing sources and means to lower our cost of capital, which could include equity, equity-linked and debt financing. In addition, in connection with any future acquisitions, we may require additional funding which may be provided in the form of additional debt, equity or equity-linked financing or a combination thereof. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms.
54
Our Indebtedness
In May 2011, we entered into a $30.0 million credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions. In September 2013, we amended this credit facility. The amendment increased the aggregate commitment amount from $30.0 million to $60.0 million, extended the maturity date from May 12, 2015 to September 12, 2018 and decreased the interest rate on borrowings. Refer to Note 8 “Debt Instruments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding our credit facility.
In July 2013, we borrowed approximately $10.0 million from the credit facility to enhance our working capital position. This amount was paid off in full in August 2013. We had no outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2014.
Capital Expenditures
Consistent with previous periods, future capital expenditures will primarily focus on acquiring additional hosting and general corporate infrastructure. Our access to capital is adequate to meet our anticipated capital expenditures for our current plans.
Historical Trends
The following table summarizes our cash flow data for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (250 | ) | $ | 1,702 | $ | (2,986 | ) | $ | 21,029 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 15,185 | 8,235 | (211,919 | ) | (112,200 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 6,669 | 5,877 | 394,997 | 21,661 | |||||||||||
Operating activities
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities was $21.0 million and primarily consisted of non-cash charges of $105.3 million, primarily related to $87.1 million in stock-based compensation charges, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $54.4 million driven by an increase in revenue and our net loss of $30.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities also included a $28.2 million decrease in deferred revenue from December 31, 2013, primarily due to the one-time recognition of the accumulation of deferred revenue related to certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores of $14.2 million and due to a decrease in deferred revenue as a result of the elimination of the annual subscription option from March through December 2014, as we collected less cash upfront under the one-month subscription period as opposed to the twelve-month subscription period under the annual subscription option. Cash provided by operating activities increased $24.0 million from the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to a $47.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense as a result of an increase in headcount, offset by a $3.4 million increase in our net loss.
In the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $3.0 million, including our net loss of $27.0 million, which was offset by non-cash charges of $50.6 million primarily related to $40.0 million in stock‑based compensation expense. Net cash used in operating activities benefited from a $13.4 million increase in deferred revenue from the prior period primarily due to an increase in subscriptions, partially driven by the temporary implementation of the mobile listening limit and an increase in accrued royalties of $13.0 million due to schedule rate increases, offset by a $60.6 million increase in accounts receivable driven by an increase in revenue.
In the eleven months ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.7 million, primarily due to non-cash charges of $31.5 million primarily related to $23.3 million in stock‑based compensation expense, offset by our net loss of $24.5 million. Net cash provided by operating activities benefited from an increase in accrued royalties of $17.5 million due to schedule rate increases and a $10.3 million increase in deferred revenue primarily due to an increase in
55
customers purchasing subscriptions for Pandora One, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $43.5 million driven by an increase in revenue.
In the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $0.3 million, including our net loss of $38.1 million, offset by non-cash charges of $33.2 million primarily related to stock-based compensation expense. Net cash used in operating activities benefited an increase in accrued royalties of $19.3 million due to schedule rate increases and an increase in deferred revenue of $10.0 million primarily due to an increase in customers purchasing subscriptions for Pandora One, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $36.7 million driven by an increase in revenue.
Investing activities
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, net cash used in investing activities was $112.2 million, primarily due to $340.7 million of purchases of investments and $30.0 million of capital expenditures for leasehold improvements and server equipment, partially offset by $258.5 million in maturities of investments.
In the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $211.9 million, primarily due to $224.5 million for purchases of investments, $21.2 million for capital expenditures for server equipment and leasehold improvements and $8.0 million for the purchase of patents, offset by $42.2 million in maturities of short-term investments.
In the eleven months ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by investing activities was $8.2 million, primarily consisting of $79.6 million in maturities of short-term investments offset by $59.6 million for the purchases of investments.
In the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, net cash provided by investing activities was $15.2 million, primarily consisting of $87.9 million in maturities of short-term investments, offset by $65.2 million for the purchases of investments.
Financing activities
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, net cash provided by financing activities was $21.7 million, primarily consisting of $16.9 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options and $6.4 million in proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan.
In the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities was $395.0 million, primarily consisting of net proceeds from the follow-on public equity offering of $378.7 million and cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $16.8 million.
In the eleven months ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $5.9 million, primarily consisting of proceeds from the issuance of common stock.
In the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities was $6.7 million, primarily consisting of proceeds from the issuance of common stock.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014:
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Less Than | More Than | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 4 - 5 Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | $ | 9,950 | $ | 8,050 | $ | 1,900 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 72,837 | 11,130 | 22,048 | 19,119 | 20,540 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 82,787 | $ | 19,180 | $ | 23,948 | $ | 19,119 | $ | 20,540 | |||||||||
Purchase Obligation
Our purchase obligations represent a non-cancelable royalty-related contractual obligation at December 31, 2014 which
56
is recoupable against future royalty payments in the amount of $5.0 million and a non-cancelable royalty-related contractual obligation at December 31, 2014, which is not recoupable against future royalty payments in the amount of $5.0 million.
Operating Lease Obligation
Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we entered into a sublease agreement to increase our leased space at our corporate headquarters in Oakland, California. This agreement is expected to result in an additional operating lease obligation of approximately $7.6 million through 2020. This obligation is not included in the table above.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Business Trends
Our operating results fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of a variety of factors. We expect our operating results to continue to fluctuate in future quarters.
Our results reflect the effects of seasonal trends in listener and advertising behavior. We expect to experience both higher advertising sales due to greater advertiser demand during the holiday season and increased usage due to the popularity of holiday music during the last three months of each calendar year. In addition, we expect to experience lower advertising sales in the first three months of each calendar year due to reduced advertiser demand and increased usage due to increased use of media-streaming devices received as gifts during the holiday season. We believe these seasonal trends have affected, and will continue to affect our operating results, particularly as increases in content acquisition costs from increased usage are not offset by increases in advertising sales in the first calendar quarter.
In addition, expenditures by advertisers tend to be cyclical and discretionary in nature, reflecting overall economic conditions, the economic prospects of specific advertisers or industries, budgeting constraints and buying patterns and a variety of other factors, many of which are outside our control. As a result of these and other factors, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of our future operating performance.
We changed our fiscal year to the calendar twelve months ended December 31 to align with the advertising industry’s business cycle, effective beginning with the period ended on December 31, 2013. The results of our fiscal quarters prior to 2014 (three months ended April 30, July 31, October 31 and January 31 of each year) reflect the same effects of the seasonal trends on advertising revenue discussed above for calendar periods, except that the impact of these advertising sales-related trends on our fiscal results was not as pronounced due to the inclusion of January instead of October in our fourth fiscal quarter.
The growth in listener hours on mobile and other connected devices was tempered in the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 by the implementation of the mobile listening limit for our advertising supported service on certain mobile and other connected devices. Effective September 2013, we eliminated this limit primarily due to our improved ability to monetize mobile listener hours. Although we have removed the broad 40 hour per month mobile listening limit, we have implemented other more precise measures that we believe will allow us to better manage the growth of mobile content acquisition costs while minimizing adverse effects on the listener experience. In addition, the mobile listening limit drove significant growth in subscribers to our ad-free service, and since removing the limit we do not expect to experience similar growth in subscriptions in the near term. To the extent we take steps such as these to affect usage on a particular platform, trends in usage may be obscured or changed and comparisons across periods may not be meaningful.
We have invested in building a local advertising sales force in major radio markets and as of December 31, 2014, we had 111 local sellers in 37 markets in the United States. As a result, we experienced an increase in local advertising revenue as a percentage of total advertising revenue in the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, and we intend to continue investing to extend our local market presence for the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Our estimates
57
form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our critical accounting policies reflect the most significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with our royalties for performance rights of musical works, advertising revenue, subscription and other revenue and stock based compensation and the valuation of stock option grants have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Royalties for Performance Rights of Musical Works
We incur royalty expenses from our public performance of musical works. This includes royalties that we pay for public performance rights to the owners of those musical works or their agents, such as ASCAP, BMI, SESAC and individual publishers. In 2010 and 2012, we elected to terminate our agreements with ASCAP and BMI, respectively. Ongoing rate court proceedings, the purported withdrawal of certain performance rights with respect to certain musical works by certain music publishers from the ASCAP and BMI catalogs, and our entry into a local marketing agreement to program KXMZ-FM, in part to allow Pandora to qualify for the current ASCAP and BMI license agreements available to owners of one or more commercial radio stations, have highlighted uncertainties for the royalty rates payable to these organizations and to musical copyright owners. We record a liability for public performance royalties based on our best estimate of the amount owed to each licensor, PROs or individual copyright owners, based on historical rates, third-party evidence and legal developments consistent with our past practices. For each quarterly period, we evaluate our estimates to assess the adequacy of recorded liabilities. If actual royalty rates differ from estimates, revisions to the estimated royalty liabilities may be required, which could materially affect our results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence exists of an arrangement with the customer reflecting the terms and conditions under which the products or services will be provided; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been provided; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. We consider a signed agreement, a binding insertion order or other similar documentation to be persuasive evidence of an arrangement. Collectability is assessed based on a number of factors, including transaction history and the creditworthiness of a customer. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, revenue is not recognized until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. We record cash received in advance of revenue recognition as deferred revenue.
Advertising revenue
We generate advertising revenue primarily from audio, display and video advertising. We generate the majority of our advertising revenue through the delivery of advertising impressions sold on a cost per thousand, or CPM, basis. In determining whether an arrangement exists, we ensure that a binding arrangement, such as an insertion order or a fully executed customer-specific agreement, is in place. We generally recognize revenue based on delivery information from our campaign trafficking systems.
We also generate advertising revenue pursuant to arrangements with advertising agencies and brokers. Under these arrangements, we provide the agencies and brokers the ability to sell advertising inventory on our service directly to advertisers. We report this revenue net of amounts due to agencies and brokers because we are not the primary obligor under these arrangements, we do not set the pricing and do not establish or maintain the relationship with the advertisers.
Subscription and other revenue
Subscription and other revenue is generated primarily through the sale of a premium version of the Pandora service which currently includes advertisement-free access and higher audio quality on supported devices. Subscription revenue derived from direct sales to listeners is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the subscription period. Subscription revenue derived from sales through some mobile operating systems may be subject to refund or cancellation terms which may affect the timing or amount of the subscription revenue recognition. When refund rights exist, we recognize revenue
58
when services have been provided and the rights lapse or when we have developed sufficient transaction history to estimate a reserve.
We were required to defer revenue for certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores that contained refund rights until the refund rights lapsed or until we developed sufficient operating history to estimate a return reserve. As of December 31, 2013, we had deferred all revenue related to these mobile subscriptions subject to refund rights totaling approximately $14.2 million, as we did not have sufficient history to estimate a return reserve. Beginning in January 2014, we had sufficient historic transactional information which enabled us to estimate future returns. Accordingly, in January 2014, we began recording revenue related to these mobile subscriptions net of estimated returns. This change resulted in a one-time increase in subscription revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2014 of approximately $14.2 million, as the previously deferred revenue was recognized. As of December 31, 2014, the deferred revenue related to the return reserve was not significant.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expenses are classified in the statement of operations based on the department to which the related employee reports. We measure stock-based compensation expense for employees at the grant date fair value of the award, and recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures.
We generally estimate the grant date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is affected by our stock price on the date of grant, the expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award, which is based on projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, the risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the award and expected dividends.
Stock-based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures in the statement of operations for only those stock-based awards that we expect to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical forfeitures of equity awards and adjust the rate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances, if any. We will revise our estimated forfeiture rate if actual forfeitures differ from our initial estimates.
59
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business, including interest rate and inflation risks.
Interest Rate Fluctuation Risk
Our exposure to interest rates relates to the increase or decrease in the amount of interest we must pay on our outstanding debt instruments. In May 2011, we entered into a $30 million credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions. In September 2013, we amended this credit facility. The amendment increased the aggregate commitment amount from $30.0 million to $60.0 million, extended the maturity date from May 12, 2015 to September 12, 2018 and decreased the interest rate on borrowings. Refer to Note 8 “Debt Instruments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding our credit facility. Any outstanding borrowings under the credit facility bear a variable interest rate and therefore the interest we pay as well as the fair value of our outstanding borrowings will fluctuate as changes occur in certain benchmark interest rates. As of December 31, 2014, we had no amounts drawn under the credit facility and had $1.1 million in outstanding letters of credit.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income without significantly increasing risk. Approximately 27% of our portfolio consists of cash and cash equivalents that have a relatively short maturity, and a fair value relatively insensitive to interest rate changes. Our available-for-sale investments consist of corporate debt securities, commercial paper and U.S. government and government agency debt securities which may be subject to market risk due to changes in prevailing interest rates that may cause the fair values of our investments to fluctuate. Based on a sensitivity analysis, we have determined that a hypothetical 100 basis points increase in interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in the fair values of our investments of approximately $2.3 million as of December 31, 2014. Such losses would only be realized if we sold the investments prior to maturity. In future periods, we will continue to evaluate our investment policy in order to ensure that we continue to meet our overall objectives.
Inflation Risk
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
60
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
PANDORA MEDIA, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page No. | |
61
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pandora Media, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pandora Media, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pandora Media, Inc. at December 31, 2013 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Pandora Media, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 11, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP | ||
San Francisco, California | ||
February 11, 2015 | ||
62
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pandora Media, Inc.
We have audited Pandora Media, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Pandora Media, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Pandora Media, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2014 consolidated financial statements of Pandora Media, Inc. and our report dated February 11, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP | ||
San Francisco, California | ||
February 11, 2015 | ||
63
Pandora Media, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
Assets | |||||||
Current assets | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 245,755 | $ | 175,957 | |||
Short-term investments | 98,662 | 178,631 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,272 at December 31, 2013 and $1,218 at December 31, 2014 | 164,023 | 218,437 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 10,343 | 15,389 | |||||
Total current assets | 518,783 | 588,414 | |||||
Long-term investments | 105,686 | 104,243 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 35,151 | 42,921 | |||||
Other long-term assets | 13,715 | 13,712 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 673,335 | $ | 749,290 | |||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 14,413 | $ | 10,825 | |||
Accrued liabilities | 14,881 | 15,754 | |||||
Accrued royalties | 66,110 | 73,693 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 42,650 | 14,412 | |||||
Accrued compensation | 17,952 | 34,476 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 156,006 | 149,160 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities | 9,098 | 16,773 | |||||
Total liabilities | 165,104 | 165,933 | |||||
Stockholders’ equity | |||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized: 195,395,940 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 209,071,488 at December 31, 2014 | 20 | 21 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 675,103 | 781,009 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (166,591 | ) | (196,997 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (301 | ) | (676 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 508,231 | 583,357 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 673,335 | $ | 749,290 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
64
Pandora Media, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||
Advertising | $ | 375,218 | $ | 343,318 | $ | 489,340 | $ | 732,338 | |||||||
Subscription and other | 51,927 | 46,166 | 110,893 | 188,464 | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 427,145 | 389,484 | 600,233 | 920,802 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue | |||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Content acquisition costs | 258,748 | 230,731 | 314,866 | 446,377 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Other | 32,282 | 28,988 | 42,217 | 61,627 | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 291,030 | 259,719 | 357,083 | 508,004 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 136,115 | 129,765 | 243,150 | 412,798 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||
Product development | 18,901 | 16,901 | 31,294 | 53,153 | |||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 107,373 | 94,212 | 169,005 | 277,330 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 47,543 | 42,716 | 69,300 | 112,443 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 173,817 | 153,829 | 269,599 | 442,926 | |||||||||||
Loss from operations | (37,702 | ) | (24,064 | ) | (26,449 | ) | (30,128 | ) | |||||||
Other income (expense), net | (441 | ) | (401 | ) | (474 | ) | 306 | ||||||||
Loss before provision for (benefit from) income taxes | (38,143 | ) | (24,465 | ) | (26,923 | ) | (29,822 | ) | |||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | (5 | ) | 3 | (94 | ) | (584 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (38,148 | ) | $ | (24,462 | ) | $ | (27,017 | ) | $ | (30,406 | ) | |||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | 168,294 | 167,956 | 180,968 | 205,273 | |||||||||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
65
Pandora Media, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands)
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||
Net loss | $ | (38,148 | ) | $ | (27,017 | ) | $ | (30,406 | ) | ||
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment | (3 | ) | (42 | ) | (184 | ) | |||||
Change in net unrealized losses on marketable securities | 2 | (253 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive loss | (1 | ) | (295 | ) | (375 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (38,149 | ) | $ | (27,312 | ) | $ | (30,781 | ) | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
66
Pandora Media, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of January 31, 2012 | 163,569,361 | $ | 16 | $ | 205,955 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (101,426 | ) | $ | 104,540 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | 8,408,842 | 1 | 7,305 | — | — | 7,306 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 25,500 | — | — | 25,500 | ||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock units | 400,112 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Share cancellations to satisfy tax withholding on vesting of restricted stock units | (18,340 | ) | — | (208 | ) | — | — | (208 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with preferred stock warrant exercise | 146,076 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Components of comprehensive loss: | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | (38,148 | ) | (38,148 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balances as of January 31, 2013 | 172,506,051 | $ | 17 | $ | 238,552 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (139,574 | ) | $ | 98,989 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | 5,659,377 | 1 | 18,355 | — | — | 18,356 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with secondary offering, net issuance costs | 15,730,000 | 2 | 378,635 | — | — | 378,637 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 40,041 | — | — | 40,041 | ||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock units | 1,520,516 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Share cancellations to satisfy tax withholding on vesting of restricted stock units | (20,004 | ) | — | (480 | ) | — | — | (480 | ) | |||||||||||||
Components of comprehensive loss: | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | (27,017 | ) | (27,017 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (295 | ) | — | (295 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2013 | 195,395,940 | $ | 20 | $ | 675,103 | $ | (301 | ) | $ | (166,591 | ) | $ | 508,231 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | 10,437,509 | 1 | 17,115 | — | — | 17,116 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | 87,055 | — | — | 87,055 | ||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock units | 3,169,456 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Share cancellations to satisfy tax withholding on vesting of restricted stock units | (73,682 | ) | — | (2,019 | ) | — | — | (2,019 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock issued under employee stock purchase plan | 142,265 | — | 3,407 | — | — | 3,407 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards | — | — | 348 | — | — | 348 | ||||||||||||||||
Components of comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | — | (30,406 | ) | (30,406 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | — | — | — | (375 | ) | — | (375 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2014 | 209,071,488 | $ | 21 | $ | 781,009 | $ | (676 | ) | $ | (196,997 | ) | $ | 583,357 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
67
Pandora Media, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Operating activities | |||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (38,148 | ) | $ | (24,462 | ) | $ | (27,017 | ) | $ | (30,406 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 7,076 | 6,406 | 10,112 | 15,431 | |||||||||||
Loss on retirement of fixed assets | 23 | 23 | — | 105 | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 25,500 | 23,283 | 40,041 | 87,055 | |||||||||||
Amortization of premium on investments | 360 | 329 | 237 | 2,833 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 264 | 242 | 220 | 197 | |||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards | — | — | — | (348 | ) | ||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (36,672 | ) | (43,487 | ) | (60,613 | ) | (54,414 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (3,752 | ) | (2,189 | ) | (7,891 | ) | (9,219 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 4,963 | 10,419 | 17,352 | 12,520 | |||||||||||
Accrued royalties | 19,261 | 17,525 | 13,027 | 7,608 | |||||||||||
Accrued compensation | 9,598 | 2,085 | (3,393 | ) | 13,736 | ||||||||||
Deferred revenue | 10,034 | 10,285 | 13,384 | (28,238 | ) | ||||||||||
Reimbursement of cost of leasehold improvements | 1,243 | 1,243 | 1,555 | 4,169 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (250 | ) | 1,702 | (2,986 | ) | 21,029 | |||||||||
Investing activities | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (7,580 | ) | (11,809 | ) | (21,180 | ) | (30,039 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of patents | — | — | (8,000 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (65,168 | ) | (59,559 | ) | (224,549 | ) | (340,679 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 87,933 | 79,603 | 42,210 | 258,518 | |||||||||||
Payments related to acquisition | — | — | (400 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 15,185 | 8,235 | (211,919 | ) | (112,200 | ) | |||||||||
Financing activities | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings under debt arrangements | — | — | 10,000 | — | |||||||||||
Repayments of debt | — | — | (10,000 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Payment of debt issuance costs in connection with the debt refinancing | — | — | (450 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Proceeds from follow-on offering, net of issuance costs | — | — | 378,654 | — | |||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 6,669 | 5,877 | 17,273 | 16,894 | |||||||||||
Tax payments from net share settlements of restricted stock units | — | — | (480 | ) | (2,019 | ) | |||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards | — | — | — | 348 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan | — | — | — | 6,438 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 6,669 | 5,877 | 394,997 | 21,661 | |||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (62 | ) | (288 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 21,599 | 15,813 | 180,030 | (69,798 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 44,126 | 44,126 | 65,725 | 245,755 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 65,725 | $ | 59,939 | $ | 245,755 | $ | 175,957 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information | |||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 26 | $ | 164 | |||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 289 | $ | 283 | $ | 18 | $ | 314 | |||||||
Purchases of property and equipment recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 1,952 | $ | 726 | $ | 7,910 | $ | 751 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
68
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Pandora Media, Inc. provides an internet radio service offering a personalized experience for each listener wherever and whenever they want to listen to radio on a wide range of smartphones, tablets, computers and car audio systems, as well as a range of other internet-connected devices. We have pioneered a new form of radio—one that uses intrinsic qualities of music to initially create stations and then adapts playlists in real-time based on the individual feedback of each listener. We generate a majority of our revenue by offering local and national advertisers an opportunity to deliver targeted messages to our listeners using a combination of audio, display and video advertisements. We also generate revenue by offering a paid subscription service which we call Pandora One. We were incorporated as a California corporation in January 2000 and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in December 2010. Our principal operations are located in the United States; we also operate in Australia and New Zealand.
As used herein, “Pandora,” “we,” “our,” the “Company” and similar terms include Pandora Media, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") and include the accounts of Pandora and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain changes in presentation have been made to conform the prior period presentation to current period reporting. Our statements of operations now include the presentation of gross profit, which is calculated as total revenue less cost of revenue. In addition, we have reclassified certain software license fees, facilities-related expenses and depreciation expenses among the general and administrative, cost of revenue—other, sales and marketing and product development lines in our consolidated statements of operations. Furthermore, we have reclassified certain compensation-related amounts from the accrued liabilities line item to the accrued compensation line item of our consolidated balance sheets and our consolidated statements of cash flows.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. Estimates are used in several areas including, but not limited to determining accrued royalties, selling prices for elements sold in multiple-element arrangements, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the fair market value of stock options and the impact of forfeitures on stock-based compensation, the provision for (benefit from) income taxes and the subscription return reserve. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments, or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements could be affected. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result.
Segments
Pandora operates in one segment. Our chief operating decision maker (the "CODM"), our Chief Executive Officer, manages our operations on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources. When evaluating our financial performance, the CODM reviews separate revenue information for our advertising, subscription and other offerings, while all other financial information is reviewed on a consolidated basis.
Fiscal year
We changed our fiscal year from the twelve months ending January 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2013. As a result of this change, our prior fiscal year was an eleven-month transition period ended on December 31, 2013. In these consolidated statements, including the notes thereto, the current year financial results ended December 31, 2014 are for a twelve-month period. Audited results for the periods ended
69
December 31, 2013 and January 31, 2013 are for an eleven-month period and a twelve-month period. In addition, the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flows include unaudited comparative amounts for the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2012. These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In our opinion, the unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of our results of operations and our cash flows for the eleven months ended December 31, 2012.
All references herein to a fiscal year prior to December 31, 2013 refer to the twelve months ended January 31 of such year, and references to the first, second, third and fourth fiscal quarters ended prior to November 1, 2013 refer to the three months ended April 30, July 31, October 31 and January 31, respectively.
All references herein to a fiscal year subsequent to December 31, 2013 refer to the twelve months ended December 31 of such year, and references to the first, second, third and fourth fiscal quarters ended subsequent to November 1, 2013 refer to the three months ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, respectively.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when four basic criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence exists of an arrangement with the customer reflecting the terms and conditions under which the products or services will be provided; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been provided; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. We consider a signed agreement, a binding insertion order or other similar documentation to be persuasive evidence of an arrangement. Collectability is assessed based on a number of factors, including transaction history and the creditworthiness of a customer. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, revenue is not recognized until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. We record cash received in advance of revenue recognition as deferred revenue.
Advertising revenue. We generate advertising revenue primarily from audio, display and video advertising. We generate the majority of our advertising revenue through the delivery of advertising impressions sold on a cost per thousand, or CPM, basis. In determining whether an arrangement exists, we ensure that a binding arrangement, such as an insertion order or a fully executed customer-specific agreement, is in place. We generally recognize revenue based on delivery information from our campaign trafficking systems.
We also generate advertising revenue pursuant to arrangements with advertising agencies and brokers. Under these arrangements, we provide the agencies and brokers the ability to sell advertising inventory on our service directly to advertisers. We report this revenue net of amounts due to agencies and brokers because we are not the primary obligor under these arrangements, we do not set the pricing and do not establish or maintain the relationship with the advertisers.
Subscription and other revenue. Subscription and other revenue is generated primarily through the sale of a premium version of the Pandora service which currently includes advertisement-free access and higher audio quality on supported devices. We offer both an annual and a monthly subscription option. Subscription revenue derived from direct sales to listeners is recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the subscription period. Subscription revenue derived from sales through some mobile operating systems may be subject to refund or cancellation terms which may affect the timing or amount of the subscription revenue recognition. When refund rights exist, we recognize revenue when services have been provided and the rights lapse or when we have developed sufficient transaction history to estimate a reserve.
We were required to defer revenue for certain subscriptions purchased through mobile app stores that contained refund rights until the refund rights lapsed or until we developed sufficient operating history to estimate a return reserve. As of December 31, 2013, we had deferred all revenue related to these mobile subscriptions subject to refund rights totaling approximately $14.2 million, as we did not have sufficient history to estimate a return reserve. Beginning in January 2014, we had sufficient historic transactional information which enabled us to estimate future returns. Accordingly, in January 2014, we began recording revenue related to these mobile subscriptions net of estimated returns. This change resulted in a one-time increase in subscription revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2014 of approximately $14.2 million, as the previously deferred revenue was recognized. As of December 31, 2014, the deferred revenue related to the return reserve was not significant.
70
Multiple-element arrangements. We enter into arrangements with customers to sell advertising packages that include different media placements or ad services that are delivered at the same time, or within close proximity of one another. We recognize the relative fair value of the media placements or ad services as they are delivered assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.
We allocate arrangement consideration in multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements at the inception of an arrangement to all deliverables or those packages in which all components of the package are delivered at the same time, based on the relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy, which includes: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") if available; (2) third-party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available; and (3) best estimate of selling price ("BESP") if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.
VSOE. We determine VSOE based on our historical pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of the selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. We have not historically priced our advertising products within a narrow range. As a result, we have not been able to establish VSOE for any of our advertising products.
TPE. When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, we apply judgment with respect to whether it can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. Generally, our go-to-market strategy differs from that of our peers and our offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services cannot be obtained. Furthermore, we are unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services' selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. As a result, we have not been able to establish selling price based on TPE.
BESP. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use BESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis. BESP is generally used to allocate the selling price to deliverables in our multiple element arrangements. We determine BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices we charge for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape and pricing practices. We limit the amount of allocable arrangement consideration to amounts that are fixed or determinable and that are not contingent on future performance or future deliverables. We regularly review BESP. Changes in assumptions or judgments or changes to the elements in the arrangement may cause an increase or decrease in the amount of revenue that we report in a particular period.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, investments and trade accounts receivable. We maintain cash and cash equivalents with domestic financial institutions of high credit quality. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of such institutions.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers to assess the probability of accounts receivable collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction experience with the customer, evaluation of their credit history, and review of the invoicing terms of the contract. We generally do not require collateral. We maintain reserves for potential credit losses on customer accounts when deemed necessary. Actual credit losses during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 were $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we had no customers that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, there were no customers that accounted for 10% or more of our total accounts receivable.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
We classify our highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase as cash equivalents. Our investments consist of commercial paper, corporate debt securities and U.S. government and government agency debt securities. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of stockholders' equity. Management determines the appropriate classification of our investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates the available-for-sale designations as of each balance
71
sheet date. We classify our investments as either short-term or long-term based on each instrument's underlying contractual maturity date. Investments with maturities of twelve months or less are classified as short-term and those with maturities greater than twelve months are classified as long-term. The cost basis for investments sold is based upon the specific identification method.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon historical loss patterns, the number of days that billings are past due and an evaluation of the potential risk of loss associated with delinquent accounts. We also consider any changes to the financial condition of our customers and any other external market factors that could impact the collectability of our receivables in the determination of our allowance for doubtful accounts.
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, which typically range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or expected useful lives of the improvements.
Property and equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If property and equipment are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Costs incurred to develop software for internal use are required to be capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset if certain criteria are met. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. We evaluate the costs incurred during the application development stage of website development to determine whether the costs meet the criteria for capitalization. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, we had approximately $1.5 million and $2.8 million of capitalized internal use software and website development costs, net of accumulated amortization. These costs are being amortized over their three-year estimated useful lives. Internal use software and website development costs are included in property and equipment.
Stock-Based Compensation—Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options
Stock-based awards granted to employees, including grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock options, are recognized as expense in our statements of operations based on their grant date fair value. We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award, which is generally four years. We estimate the fair value of RSUs at our stock price on the grant date. We generally estimate the grant date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is affected by our stock price on the date of grant, the expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award, which is based on projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, the risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the award and expected dividends.
Stock-based compensation expense is recorded net of estimated forfeitures in the statement of operations for only those stock-based awards that we expect to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical forfeitures of equity awards and adjust the rate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances, if any. We revise our estimated forfeiture rate if actual forfeitures differ from our initial estimates.
We have elected to use the "with and without" approach as described in Accounting Standards Codification 740 - Income Taxes in determining the order in which tax attributes are utilized. As a result, we will only recognize a tax benefit from stock-based awards in additional paid-in capital if an incremental tax benefit is realized after all other tax attributes currently available to us have been utilized. In addition, we have elected to account for the indirect effects of stock-based awards on other tax attributes, such as the research tax credit, through the statement of operations.
72
Stock-Based Compensation—Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In December 2013, our board of directors approved the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which was approved by our stockholders at the annual meeting in June 2014. We estimate the fair value of shares to be issued under the ESPP on the first day of the offering period using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The determination of the fair value is affected by our stock price on the first date of the offering period, as well as other assumptions including the risk-free interest rate, the estimated volatility of our stock price over the term of the offering period, the expected term of the offering period and the expected dividend rate. Stock-based compensation expense related to the ESPP is recognized on a straight-line basis over the offering period, net of estimated forfeitures.
Cost of Revenue—Content Acquisition Costs
Cost of revenue—content acquisition costs principally consist of royalties paid for streaming music or other content to our listeners. Royalties are currently calculated using negotiated rates documented in agreements. The majority of our royalties are payable based on a fee per public performance of a sound recording, while in other cases our royalties are payable based on a percentage of our revenue or a formula that involves a combination of per performance and revenue metrics. For royalty arrangements under negotiation, we accrue for estimated royalties based on the available facts and circumstances and adjust these estimates as more information becomes available.
Cost of Revenue—Other
Cost of revenue—other consists primarily of hosting and ad serving costs, employee-related costs and other costs of ad sales. Hosting and ad serving costs consist of content streaming, maintaining our internet radio service and creating and serving advertisements through third-party ad servers. We make payments to third-party ad servers for the period the advertising impressions are delivered or click-through actions occur, and accordingly, we record this as a cost of revenue in the related period. Employee-related costs include salaries and benefits associated with supporting hosting and ad serving functions. Other costs of ad sales include costs related to music events that are sold as part of advertising arrangements.
Product Development
Product development consists primarily of employee-related costs, including salaries and benefits related to employees in software engineering, music analysis and product management departments, facilities-related expenses, information technology and costs associated with supporting consumer connected-device manufacturers in implementing our service in their products. We incur product development expenses primarily for improvements to our website and the Pandora app, development of new advertising products and development and enhancement of our personalized station generating system. We have generally expensed product development as incurred.
Certain website development and internal use software development costs are capitalized when specific criteria are met. In such cases, the capitalized amounts are amortized over the useful life of the related application once the application is placed in service.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing consists primarily of employee-related costs, including salaries, commissions and benefits related to employees in sales, sales support and marketing departments. In addition, sales and marketing expenses include transaction processing commissions on subscription purchases through mobile app stores, external sales and marketing expenses such as brand marketing and customer acquisition costs, public relations expenses, costs related to music events, agency platform and media measurement expenses, facilities-related expenses and infrastructure costs.
General and Administrative
General and administrative consists primarily of employee-related costs, including salaries and benefits for finance, accounting, legal, internal information technology and other administrative personnel. In addition, general and administrative expenses include professional services costs for outside legal and accounting services, facilities-related expenses, infrastructure costs and credit card fees.
73
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
We account for our provision for (benefit from) income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted statutory income tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. We will recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for (benefit from) income taxes in the accompanying statement of operations.
We calculate the current and deferred income tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed income tax returns are recorded when identified. The amount of income taxes paid is subject to examination by U.S. federal, state and international tax authorities. The estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is subject to management's assessment of relevant risks, facts and circumstances existing at that time. To the extent that the assessment of such tax positions change, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the determination is made.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential shares of common stock, including stock options and restricted stock units, to the extent dilutive. Basic and diluted net loss per share were the same for each period presented as the inclusion of all potential common shares outstanding would have been anti-dilutive.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-9”). ASU 2014-9 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue. Under the guidance, revenue is recognized when a company transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard is effective for public entities with annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt the guidance. We are currently evaluating implementation methods and the effect that implementation of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires management of all entities to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued when applicable). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods within that fiscal year. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
3. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash, cash equivalents and investments consisted of the following:
74
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||
Cash | $ | 89,176 | $ | 72,487 | |||
Money market funds | 98,437 | 89,113 | |||||
Commercial paper | 54,247 | 9,349 | |||||
Corporate debt securities | 3,895 | 5,008 | |||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | $ | 245,755 | $ | 175,957 | |||
Short-term investments | |||||||
Commercial paper | $ | 47,526 | $ | 45,443 | |||
Corporate debt securities | 50,436 | 128,691 | |||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | 700 | 4,497 | |||||
Total short-term investments | $ | 98,662 | $ | 178,631 | |||
Long-term investments | |||||||
Corporate debt securities | $ | 100,690 | $ | 100,998 | |||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | 4,996 | 3,245 | |||||
Total long-term investments | $ | 105,686 | $ | 104,243 | |||
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments | $ | 450,103 | $ | 458,831 | |||
Our short-term investments have maturities of twelve months or less and are classified as available-for-sale. Our long-term investments have maturities of greater than twelve months and are classified as available-for-sale.
The following tables summarizes our available-for-sale securities’ adjusted cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value by significant investment category as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.
As of December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted Cost | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents and marketable securities | |||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 98,437 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 98,437 | |||||||
Commercial paper | 101,773 | — | — | 101,773 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 155,273 | 6 | (258 | ) | 155,021 | ||||||||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | 5,700 | — | (4 | ) | 5,696 | ||||||||||
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 361,183 | $ | 6 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 360,927 | ||||||
As of December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted Cost | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents and marketable securities | |||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 89,113 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 89,113 | |||||||
Commercial paper | 54,792 | — | — | 54,792 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 235,135 | 6 | (444 | ) | 234,697 | ||||||||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | 7,751 | — | (9 | ) | 7,742 | ||||||||||
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities | $ | 386,791 | $ | 6 | $ | (453 | ) | $ | 386,344 | ||||||
75
The following tables present available-for-sale investments by contractual maturity date as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.
As of December 31, 2013 | |||||||
Adjusted Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 255,278 | $ | 255,241 | |||
Due after one year through three years | 105,905 | 105,686 | |||||
Total | $ | 361,183 | $ | 360,927 | |||
As of December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Adjusted Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 282,206 | $ | 282,101 | |||
Due after one year through three years | 104,585 | 104,243 | |||||
Total | $ | 386,791 | $ | 386,344 | |||
The following tables summarize our available-for-sale securities’ fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.
As of December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Twelve Months or Less | More than Twelve Months | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
Commercial paper | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 130,308 | (258 | ) | — | — | 130,308 | (258 | ) | |||||||||||||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | 5,697 | (4 | ) | — | — | 5,697 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 136,005 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 136,005 | $ | (262 | ) | |||||||||
76
As of December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Twelve Months or Less | More than Twelve Months | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||
Commercial paper | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities | 192,699 | (422 | ) | 12,148 | (22 | ) | 204,847 | (444 | ) | ||||||||||||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | 5,240 | (9 | ) | — | — | 5,240 | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 197,939 | $ | (431 | ) | $ | 12,148 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 210,087 | $ | (453 | ) | ||||||||
Our investment policy requires investments to be investment grade, primarily rated “A1” by Standard & Poor’s or “P1” by Moody’s or better for short-term investments and rated “A” by Standard & Poor’s or “A2” by Moody’s or better for long-term investments, with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss. In addition, the investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
The unrealized losses on our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2014 were primarily a result of unfavorable changes in interest rates subsequent to the initial purchase of these securities. As of December 31, 2014, we owned 151 securities that were in an unrealized loss position. We do not intend nor expect to need to sell these securities before recovering the associated unrealized losses. We expect to recover the full carrying value of these securities. As a result, no portion of the unrealized losses at December 31, 2014 is deemed to be other-than-temporary and the unrealized losses are not deemed to be credit losses. When evaluating the investments for other-than-temporary impairment, we review factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer and any changes thereto, and our intent to sell, or whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell, the investment before recovery of the investment’s amortized cost basis. During the twelve months ended months ended December 31, 2014, we did not recognize any impairment charges.
Accounts Receivable
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net | |||||||
Accounts receivable | $ | 165,295 | $ | 219,655 | |||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (1,272 | ) | (1,218 | ) | |||
Total accounts receivable, net | $ | 164,023 | $ | 218,437 | |||
The following table summarizes our beginning allowance for doubtful accounts balance for each period, additions, write-offs net of recoveries and the balance at the end of each period for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014:
77
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions | Write-offs, Net of Recoveries | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2013 | $ | 590 | 659 | (488 | ) | $ | 761 | ||||||
For the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 | $ | 761 | 948 | (437 | ) | $ | 1,272 | ||||||
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 | $ | 1,272 | 1,064 | (1,118 | ) | $ | 1,218 | ||||||
Property and Equipment, net
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Property and equipment | |||||||
Servers, computers and other related equipment | $ | 27,361 | $ | 39,890 | |||
Leasehold improvements | 11,314 | 25,893 | |||||
Office furniture and equipment | 2,248 | 2,721 | |||||
Construction in progress | 13,575 | 5,075 | |||||
Software developed for internal use | 2,173 | 4,519 | |||||
Total property and equipment | $ | 56,671 | $ | 78,098 | |||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (21,520 | ) | (35,177 | ) | |||
Total property and equipment, net | $ | 35,151 | $ | 42,921 | |||
Depreciation expenses totaled $7.1 million, $9.7 million and $14.7 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, respectively. There were no material write-offs during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 or the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
Software developed for internal use generally has an expected useful life of three years from the date placed in service. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014 the net carrying amount was $1.5 million and $2.8 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.7 million and $1.7 million. Amortization expense for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was $0.1 million, $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2014:
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Other long-term liabilities | |||||||
Long-term deferred rent | $ | 8,352 | $ | 15,068 | |||
Other | 746 | 1,705 | |||||
Total other long-term liabilities | $ | 9,098 | $ | 16,773 | |||
78
For operating leases that include escalation clauses over the term of the lease, tenant improvement reimbursements and rent abatement periods, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term including expected renewal periods. The difference between rent expense and rent payments is recorded as deferred rent.
4. Fair Value
We record cash equivalents and investments at fair value. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Fair value measurements are required to be disclosed by level within the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life.
Level 3 — Inputs lack observable market data to corroborate management’s estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
When determining fair value, whenever possible we use observable market data and rely on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available.
The fair value of these financial assets and liabilities was determined using the following inputs at December 31, 2013 and 2014:
As of December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||
Fair Value Measurement Using | |||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Total | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 98,437 | $ | — | $ | 98,437 | |||||
Commercial paper | — | 101,773 | 101,773 | ||||||||
Corporate debt securities | — | 155,021 | 155,021 | ||||||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | — | 5,696 | 5,696 | ||||||||
Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 98,437 | $ | 262,490 | $ | 360,927 | |||||
79
As of December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||
Fair Value Measurement Using | |||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Total | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 89,113 | $ | — | $ | 89,113 | |||||
Commercial paper | — | 54,792 | 54,792 | ||||||||
Corporate debt securities | — | 234,697 | 234,697 | ||||||||
U.S. government and government agency debt securities | — | 7,742 | 7,742 | ||||||||
Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 89,113 | $ | 297,231 | $ | 386,344 | |||||
Our money market funds are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy because they are valued primarily using quoted market prices. Our other cash equivalents and investments are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using professional pricing sources for identical or comparable instruments, rather than direct observations of quoted prices in active markets. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, we held no Level 3 assets or liabilities.
5. Other Long-Term Assets
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Other long-term assets | |||||||
Patents, net of amortization | $ | 7,636 | $ | 6,939 | |||
Long-term security deposits | 4,736 | 4,947 | |||||
Other | 1,343 | 1,826 | |||||
Total other long-term assets | $ | 13,715 | $ | 13,712 | |||
Patents
In June 2013, we purchased certain internet radio-related patents from Yahoo! Inc. for $8.0 million in cash. We intend to hold these patents as part of our strategy to protect and defend Pandora from patent-related litigation. These patents are being amortized over the estimated useful life of the patents of eleven years. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, the net carrying amount of these patents was $7.6 million and $6.9 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.4 million and $1.1 million. Amortization expense for the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was $0.4 million and $0.7 million.
The following is a schedule of future amortization expense related to patents as of December 31, 2014:
80
As of December 31, 2014 | |||
(in thousands) | |||
2015 | $ | 733 | |
2016 | 733 | ||
2017 | 733 | ||
2018 | 733 | ||
2019 | 733 | ||
Thereafter | 3,275 | ||
Total future amortization expense | $ | 6,940 | |
Restricted Cash
As part of our original May 2011 credit facility, we had entered into a cash collateral agreement in connection with the issuance of letters of credit that were used to satisfy deposit requirements under facility leases, refer to Note 8 “Debt Instruments” for more information. In September 2013, we amended the credit facility and terminated the cash collateral agreement. As a result, our outstanding letters of credit no longer required cash collateral and all cash collateral that was considered restricted cash was returned to us in September 2013.
Pending Acquisition
In June 2013, we entered into a local marketing agreement to program KXMZ-FM, a Rapid City, South Dakota-area terrestrial radio station. In addition, we entered into an agreement to purchase the assets of KXMZ-FM for a total purchase price of approximately $0.6 million in cash, subject to certain closing conditions. As of December 31, 2014, we have paid $0.4 million of the purchase price, which is included in the other long-term assets line item of our balance sheets.
The completion of the KXMZ-FM acquisition is subject to various closing conditions, which include, but are not limited to, regulatory approval by the Federal Communications Commission. Upon completion of these conditions, we expect to account for this acquisition as a business combination.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments and future minimum sublease income under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2014:
As of December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Future Minimum Lease Payments | Future Minimum Sublease Income | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
2015 | $ | 11,130 | $ | 1,216 | |||
2016 | 11,092 | 1,246 | |||||
2017 | 10,956 | 1,277 | |||||
2018 | 10,256 | 541 | |||||
2019 | 8,863 | — | |||||
Thereafter | 20,540 | — | |||||
Total | $ | 72,837 | $ | 4,280 | |||
81
We conduct our operations using leased office facilities in various locations. We lease office space under arrangements expiring through 2024. Rent expenses for twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 were $3.2 million, $5.7 million and $8.6 million, respectively.
For operating leases that include escalation clauses over the term of the lease, tenant improvement reimbursements and rent abatement periods, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term including expected renewal periods. The difference between rent expense and rent payments is recorded as deferred rent in current and long-term liabilities. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014 deferred rent was $9.4 million and $15.3 million.
Purchase Obligation
As of December 31, 2014, we had a non-cancelable royalty-related contractual obligation, which is recoupable against future royalty payments in the amount of $5.0 million and a non-cancelable royalty-related contractual obligation, which is not recoupable against future royalty payments in the amount of $5.0 million.
Legal Proceedings
We have been in the past, and continue to be, a party to various legal proceedings, which have consumed, and may continue to consume, financial and managerial resources. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Our management periodically evaluates developments that could affect the amount, if any, of liability that we have previously accrued and make adjustments as appropriate. Determining both the likelihood and the estimated amount of a loss requires significant judgment, and management’s judgment may be incorrect. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of any pending legal matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
PRO rate-setting litigation
On November 5, 2012, we filed a petition in the rate court established by the consent decree between the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (“ASCAP”) and the U.S. Department of Justice in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the determination of reasonable license fees and terms for the ASCAP consent decree license applicable to the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. On June 11, 2013 we filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking a determination that as a matter of law the publishers alleged to have withdrawn certain rights of public performance by digital audio transmission from the scope of grant of rights ASCAP could license on behalf of such publishers subsequent to the date of our request for a license from ASCAP were not valid as to our ASCAP consent decree license. On September 17, 2013, our motion for partial summary judgment was granted, alleviating the need to negotiate direct licenses for such purportedly withdrawn performance rights. A trial to determine the royalty rates we will pay ASCAP concluded in February 2014 and the court issued its opinion in March 2014. On April 14, 2014, ASCAP, Sony/ATV, EMI Music Publishing, and Universal Publishing Group filed notices of appeal of the District Court’s decision with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral arguments have been scheduled for March 19, 2015.
On June 13, 2013, Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) filed a petition in the rate court established by the consent decree between BMI and the U.S. Department of Justice in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the determination of reasonable fees and terms for the BMI consent decree license applicable to the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014. We filed our response on July 19, 2013. On November 1, 2013, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment seeking a determination that as a matter of law the publishers alleged to have withdrawn certain rights of public performance by digital audio transmission from the scope of grant of rights BMI could license on behalf of such publishers subsequent to the date of our request for a license from BMI were not valid as to our BMI consent decree license. On December 18, 2013, our motion for summary judgment was denied based on the Court’s determination that an attempted partial withdrawal, although inconsistent with BMI’s obligations under its consent decree, would result in a publisher’s complete withdrawal from BMI. This rate proceeding commenced on February 10, 2015.
Pre-1972 copyright litigation
On April 17, 2014, UMG Recordings, Inc., Sony Music Entertainment, Capitol Records, LLC, Warner Music Group Corp., and ABKCO Music and Records, Inc. filed suit against Pandora Media Inc. in the Supreme Court of the State of New
82
York. The complaint claims common law copyright infringement and unfair competition arising from allegations that Pandora owes royalties for the public performance of sound recordings recorded prior to February 15, 1972.
On October 2, 2014, Flo & Eddie Inc. filed suit against Pandora Media Inc. in the federal district court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleges misappropriation and conversion in connection with the public performance of sound recordings recorded prior to February 15, 1972. On December 19, 2014, Pandora filed a motion to strike Plaintiffs’ complaint in the Flo & Eddie case pursuant to California’s Anti-Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (“Anti-SLAPP”) statute. This motion is currently pending before the Court.
The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain. Based on our current knowledge we believe that the final outcome of the matters discussed above will not likely, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, in light of the uncertainties involved in such matters, there can be no assurance that the outcome of each case or the costs of litigation, regardless of outcome, will not have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, rate court proceedings could take years to complete, could be very costly and may result in royalty rates that are materially less favorable than rates we currently pay.
Indemnification Agreements, Guarantees and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, we are party to certain contractual agreements under which we may provide indemnifications of varying scope, terms and duration to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements, services to be provided by us or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with directors and certain officers and employees that will require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. Such indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance with guarantor’s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees, including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others. To date, we have not incurred, do not anticipate incurring and therefore have not accrued for, any costs related to such indemnification provisions.
While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any claims under indemnification arrangements will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
7. Provision for Income Taxes
Loss before provision for income taxes by jurisdiction consists of the following:
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Jurisdiction | |||||||||||
Domestic | $ | (39,891 | ) | $ | (24,005 | ) | $ | (24,230 | ) | ||
Foreign | 1,748 | (2,918 | ) | (5,592 | ) | ||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes | $ | (38,143 | ) | $ | (26,923 | ) | $ | (29,822 | ) | ||
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
83
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Current | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
State and local | (4 | ) | 7 | 353 | |||||||
International | 9 | 87 | 231 | ||||||||
Total current income tax expense | $ | 5 | $ | 94 | $ | 584 | |||||
Deferred | |||||||||||
Federal | (10,098 | ) | (10,166 | ) | (9,996 | ) | |||||
State and local | (1,573 | ) | (2,027 | ) | (6,238 | ) | |||||
Valuation allowance | 11,671 | 12,193 | 16,234 | ||||||||
Total deferred income tax expense | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Total provision for income taxes | $ | 5 | $ | 94 | $ | 584 | |||||
The provision for income taxes increased by $0.5 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 as a result of an increase in foreign income taxes and state income taxes computed without the benefit of stock options.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the statutory federal rate and our effective tax rate:
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | ||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||
U.S. federal taxes at statutory rate | 34 | % | 34 | % | 34 | % | ||
State taxes, net of federal benefit | — | — | (1 | ) | ||||
Permanent differences | (2 | ) | 5 | 4 | ||||
Foreign rate differential | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||
Federal and state credits, net of reserve | 2 | 8 | 11 | |||||
Change in valuation allowance | (30 | ) | (46 | ) | (55 | ) | ||
Change in rate | (2 | ) | — | 6 | ||||
Deferred adjustments | — | 3 | 6 | |||||
Effective tax rate | — | % | — | % | (2 | )% | ||
The major components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
84
As of December 31, | |||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Deferred tax assets | |||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 34,525 | $ | 27,487 | |||
Tax credit carryforwards | 5,745 | 10,839 | |||||
Allowances and other | 7,037 | 13,832 | |||||
Stock options | 10,159 | 24,215 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 323 | 255 | |||||
Total deferred tax assets | $ | 57,789 | $ | 76,628 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (41 | ) | (2,645 | ) | |||
Total deferred tax liabilities | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (2,645 | ) | |
Valuation allowance | (57,748 | ) | (73,983 | ) | |||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | — | $ | — | |||
At December 31, 2014, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $447.0 million and tax credit carryforwards of approximately $7.9 million. If realized, approximately $378.0 million of the net operating loss carryforwards will be recognized as a benefit through additional paid in capital. The federal net operating losses and tax credits expire in years beginning in 2021. At December 31, 2014, we had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $496.0 million which expire in years beginning in 2015. In addition, we had state tax credit carryforwards of approximately $8.3 million that do not expire and approximately $3.7 million of credits that will expire beginning in 2024.
Under Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, if a corporation undergoes an "ownership change," the corporation's ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its post-change income may be limited. In general, an "ownership change" will occur if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by "5-percent shareholders" that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. Utilization of our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations due to ownership changes. Such annual limitations could result in the expiration of our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards before they are utilized.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, our valuation allowance increased by $16.2 million. At December 31, 2013 and 2014, we maintained a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance was determined in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 740 - Income Taxes, which requires an assessment of both positive and negative evidence when determining whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. Such assessment is required on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. Our history of cumulative losses, along with expected future U.S. losses required that a full valuation allowance be recorded against all net deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain a full valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the valuation allowance.
At December 31, 2013 and 2014 we have unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $5.2 million and $5.8 million. The increase in our unrecognized tax benefits was primarily attributable to current year activities. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) is as follows:
85
Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | ||||||
2013 | 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 2,633 | $ | 5,220 | |||
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year | 108 | 1,161 | |||||
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year | — | (1,924 | ) | ||||
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current year | 2,479 | 1,336 | |||||
Ending balance | $ | 5,220 | $ | 5,793 | |||
The total unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would not affect our effective tax rate as the tax benefit would increase a deferred tax asset, which is currently offset with a full valuation allowance. We do not anticipate that the amount of existing unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes. We did not have such interest, penalties or tax benefits during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 or the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.
We file income tax returns in the United States, California, other states and international jurisdictions. Tax years 2000 to 2014 remain subject to examination for U.S. federal, state and international purposes. All net operating losses and tax credits generated to date are subject to adjustment for U.S. federal and state purposes. We are not currently under examination in any federal, state or international jurisdictions.
8. Debt Instruments
In May 2011, we entered into a $30.0 million credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions. At our option, drawn amounts under the credit facility bore an interest rate of either an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.75% - 3.00% or an alternate base rate plus 1.75% - 2.00%, both of which were per annum rates based on outstanding borrowings. Adjusted LIBOR is LIBOR for a particular interest period multiplied by the statutory reserve rate. The alternate base rate is the greatest of the prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% and adjusted LIBOR plus 1%. In addition, the credit facility included a non-usage charge on the available balance of 0.5% - 0.625% per annum based on outstanding borrowings. Under the credit facility, we could request the issuance of up to $5.0 million in letters of credit by the financial institutions. The annual charge for any outstanding letters of credit was 2.75% - 3.00% per annum based on outstanding borrowings.
In September 2013, we amended this credit facility. The amendment increased the aggregate commitment amount from $30.0 million to $60.0 million and extended the maturity date from May 12, 2015 to September 12, 2018. The amendment further decreased the interest rate on borrowings by 0.75% to either LIBOR plus 2.00% - 2.25% or an alternate base rate plus 1.00% - 1.25%, both of which are per annum rates based on outstanding borrowings. In addition, the amendment decreased the non-usage fee to 0.375% per annum. The amount of available letters of credit under the amended credit facility was increased from $5.0 million to $15.0 million, and the annual charge for outstanding letters of credit was reduced by 0.75% to 2.00% - 2.25% per annum based on outstanding borrowings.
The amount of borrowings available under the credit facility at any time is based on our monthly accounts receivable balance at such time and the amounts borrowed are collateralized by our personal property, including such accounts receivable but excluding intellectual property. The credit facility contains customary events of default, conditions to borrowing and covenants, including restrictions on our ability to dispose of assets, make acquisitions, incur debt, incur liens and make distributions to stockholders. The credit facility also includes a financial covenant requiring the maintenance of minimum liquidity of at least $5.0 million. During the continuance of an event of a default, the lenders may accelerate amounts outstanding, terminate the credit facility and foreclose on all collateral.
As part of the original credit facility, we had entered into a cash collateral agreement in connection with the issuance of letters of credit that were used to satisfy deposit requirements under facility leases. Under the amended credit facility, the cash collateral agreement was terminated and, as a result, letters of credit no longer require cash collateral. In connection with the termination of the cash collateral agreement, all cash collateral that was considered restricted cash was returned to us in September 2013.
86
In July 2013, we borrowed approximately $10.0 million from the credit facility to enhance our working capital position. This amount was paid off in full in August 2013. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, we had no outstanding borrowings, $1.1 million in letters of credit outstanding and $58.9 million of available borrowing capacity under the credit facility.
Total debt issuance costs associated with the May 2011 credit facility were $1.0 million, which were amortized as interest expense over the four-year term of the May 2011 credit facility agreement. As part of the amendment, the amortization period for the remaining unamortized costs incurred in connection with the May 2011 credit facility was adjusted to reflect the amended term of the credit facility. We further incurred $0.5 million in debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment, which are being amortized over the term of the amended credit facility. For twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million of debt issuance costs, respectively, were amortized and included in interest expense.
9. Stock-based Compensation Plans and Awards
Stock Compensation Plans
In 2000, our board of directors adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2000 Plan"). In 2004, our board of directors adopted the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the "2004 Plan"), which replaced the 2000 Plan and provided for the issuance of incentive and non-statutory stock options to employees and other service providers of Pandora. In 2011, our board of directors adopted the Pandora Media, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2011 Plan" and, together with the 2000 Plan and the 2004 Plan, the "Plans"), which replaced the 2004 Plan. The Plans are administered by the compensation committee of our board of directors (the "Plan Administrator").
The 2011 Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards. Shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2011 Plan include 12,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2011 Plan and 1,506,424 shares of common stock previously reserved but unissued under the 2004 Plan as of June 14, 2011. To the extent awards outstanding as of June 14, 2011 under the 2004 Plan expire or terminate for any reason prior to exercise or would otherwise return to the share reserve under the 2004 Plan, the shares of common stock subject to such awards will instead be available for future issuance under the 2011 Plan. Each year, the number of shares in the reserve under the Plan may be increased by the lesser of 10,000,000 shares, 4.0% of the outstanding shares of common stock on the last day of the prior fiscal year or another amount determined by our board of directors. The 2011 Plan is scheduled to terminate in 2021, unless our board of directors determines otherwise.
Under the 2011 Plan, the Plan Administrator determines various terms and conditions of awards including option expiration dates (no more than ten years from the date of grant), vesting terms (generally over a four-year period) and payment terms. For stock option grants the exercise price is determined by the Plan Administrator, but generally may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
Shares available for grant as of December 31, 2014 and the activity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 are as follows:
Shares Available for Grant | ||||||||
Equity Awards | ESPP | Total | ||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | 9,048,200 | — | 9,048,200 | |||||
Additional shares authorized | 7,815,837 | 4,000,000 | 11,815,837 | |||||
Options granted | (349,500 | ) | — | (349,500 | ) | |||
Restricted stock granted | (4,909,360 | ) | — | (4,909,360 | ) | |||
ESPP shares issued | — | (142,265 | ) | (142,265 | ) | |||
Options forfeited | 1,639,935 | — | 1,639,935 | |||||
Restricted stock forfeited | 1,081,348 | — | 1,081,348 | |||||
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | 14,326,460 | 3,857,735 | 18,184,195 | |||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
87
In December 2013, our board of directors approved the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which was approved by our stockholders at the annual meeting in June 2014. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to a maximum of $25,000 per calendar year. Shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP include 4,000,000 shares of common stock. The ESPP provides for six- month offering periods, commencing in February and August of each year. At the end of each offering period employees are able to purchase shares at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of our common stock on the first trading day of the offering period or on the last day of the offering period.
We estimate the fair value of shares to be issued under the ESPP on the first day of the offering period using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The determination of the fair value is affected by our stock price on the first date of the offering period, as well as other assumptions including the risk-free interest rate, the estimated volatility of our stock price over the term of the offering period, the expected term of the offering period and the expected dividend rate. Stock-based compensation expense related to the ESPP is recognized on a straight-line basis over the offering period, net of estimated forfeitures.
The per-share fair value of shares to be granted under the ESPP is determined on the first day of the offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:
Twelve months ended December 31, | ||
2014 | ||
Expected life (in years) | 0.5 | |
Risk-free interest rate | 0.06 | % |
Expected volatility | 42 | % |
Expected dividend yield | 0 | % |
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we recognized $2.1 million of stock-based compensation expense related to the ESPP. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, 149,378 shares of common stock were issued under the ESPP at a purchase price of $23.95, which represents 85% of our stock price on the date of purchase of $28.17. There were no stock-based compensation expense related to the ESPP or shares of common stock issued under the ESPP in the twelve months ended January 31, 2013 or the eleven months ended December 31, 2013.
Stock Options
Stock option activity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was as follows:
88
Options Outstanding | ||||||||||||
Outstanding Stock Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) | |||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | 22,708,200 | $ | 4.85 | 5.76 | $ | 493,866 | ||||||
Granted | 349,500 | 35.61 | ||||||||||
Exercised | (10,437,509 | ) | 1.62 | |||||||||
Forfeited | (1,639,935 | ) | 11.49 | |||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | 10,980,256 | 7.91 | 1.08 | 120,033 | ||||||||
Exercisable as of December 31, 2014 | 7,958,775 | 4.39 | 0.40 | 108,296 | ||||||||
Expected to vest as of December 31, 2014 (2) | 2,719,853 | $ | 17.05 | 2.82 | $ | 10,822 | ||||||
(1)Amounts represent the difference between the exercise price and the fair value of common stock at each period end for all in the money options outstanding based on the fair value per share of common stock of $26.60 and $17.83 as of December 31, 2013 and 2014. | ||||||||||||
(2)Options expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture rate. | ||||||||||||
The per-share fair value of stock options granted during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was determined on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | ||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||
Expected life (in years) | 6.02 - 6.67 | 5.99 - 6.32 | 6.08 | |||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.99% - 1.52% | 1.00% - 2.04% | 1.71% - 1.93% | |||||
Expected volatility | 56% - 57% | 58% - 59% | 58% - 59% | |||||
Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||
The expected term of stock options granted represents the weighted average period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. We determined the expected term assumption based on our historical exercise behavior combined with estimates of the post-vesting holding period. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of peer companies in our industry that have similar vesting and contractual terms. The risk free interest rate is based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with terms approximately equal to the expected life of the option. We currently have no history or expectation of paying cash dividends on our common stock.
During the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we recorded stock-based compensation expense related to stock options of approximately $14.9 million, $10.6 million and $14.7 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2014, there was $26.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding employee stock options. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.86 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate differs from our estimates, stock-based compensation related to these awards could differ from our expectations.
The weighted-average fair value of stock option grants made during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was $5.91, $9.34 and $19.74 per share, respectively.
The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was $13.0 million, $9.1 million and $16.0 million, respectively.
89
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was $84.9 million, $93.8 million and $169.2 million, respectively. The total fair value of options vested during the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 was $13.1 million, $9.4 million and $16.5 million, respectively.
Stock option awards with both a service period and a market condition
In March 2012, Mr. Joseph Kennedy, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, was granted non-statutory stock options to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $10.63 per share. This award included both a service period and a market vesting condition that stipulated that the award would vest if the 60-day trailing volume weighted average price of our common stock exceeded $21.00 per share, or if there was a sale of the Company for at least $21.00 per share, in each case prior to July 2017. Upon the market condition being met, the award would vest ratably over four years, beginning in July 2013, subject to severance and change of control acceleration.
We used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the award due to the market vesting condition. The following assumptions were used to value the award using the Monte Carlo simulation: ten-year term, risk-free interest rate of 2.33%, expected volatility of 70% and a beginning stock price of $10.63. The grant-date fair value for the award was $6.08 per share.
In March 2013, we announced that we would begin a process to identify a successor to Mr. Kennedy as CEO, which prompted us to re-evaluate certain estimates and assumptions related to the stock-based compensation expense associated with his awards. As a result of this re-evaluation, we reduced stock-based compensation expense by $1.7 million during the three months ended April 30, 2013, primarily related to the award with both a service period and a market condition. In September 2013, the market condition for Mr. Kennedy’s awards was met and the shares became exercisable as if they had been vesting ratably over four years from July 2013. In the eleven months ended December 31, 2013, we recorded $0.6 million in additional stock-based compensation expense in connection with these awards.
Restricted Stock Units
The fair value of the restricted stock units is expensed ratably over the vesting period. RSUs vest annually on a cliff basis over the service period, which is generally four years. During the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we recorded stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units of approximately $10.4 million, $28.9 million and $69.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, total compensation cost not yet recognized of approximately $197.3 million related to non-vested restricted stock units, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.60 years.
The following table summarizes the activities for our RSUs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014:
Number of RSUs | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Unvested as of December 31, 2013 | 10,365,512 | $ | 14.31 | |||
Granted | 4,909,360 | 32.29 | ||||
Vested | (3,169,456 | ) | 13.85 | |||
Forfeited | (1,081,348 | ) | 19.06 | |||
Unvested as of December 31, 2014 | 11,024,068 | 21.99 | ||||
Expected to vest as of December 31, 2014 (1) | 9,914,453 | $ | 21.88 | |||
(1) RSUs expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture rate. | ||||||
Stock-based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense related to all employee and non-employee stock-based awards was as follows:
90
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | |||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Other | $ | 1,214 | $ | 1,946 | $ | 4,414 | |||||
Product development | 4,530 | 8,802 | 17,546 | ||||||||
Sales and marketing | 12,294 | 20,222 | 42,165 | ||||||||
General and administrative | 7,462 | 9,071 | 22,930 | ||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 25,500 | $ | 40,041 | $ | 87,055 | |||||
During the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, we capitalized $0.7 million and $1.3 million of stock-based compensation as internal use software and website development costs. There was no capitalized stock-based compensation in the twelve months ended January 31, 2013.
10. Common Stock and Net Loss per Share
Each share of common stock has the right to one vote per share. The holders of common stock are also entitled to receive dividends as and when declared by our board of directors, whenever funds are legally available.
Follow-on Public Offering
In September 2013, we completed a follow-on public equity offering in which we sold an aggregate of 15,730,000 shares of our common stock, inclusive of 2,730,000 shares sold pursuant to the exercise by the underwriters of an option to purchase additional shares, at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. In addition, another 5,200,000 shares were sold by certain selling stockholders. We received aggregate net proceeds of $378.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses from sales of our shares in the offering. We did not receive any of the proceeds from the sales of shares by the selling stockholders.
Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential shares of common stock, including stock options and restricted stock units, to the extent dilutive. Basic and diluted net loss per share were the same for the twelve months ended January 31, 2013, the eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as the inclusion of all potential common shares outstanding would have been anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the computation of historical basic and diluted net loss per share:
Twelve months ended January 31, | Eleven months ended December 31, | Twelve months ended December 31, | |||||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||
(in thousands except per share amounts) | |||||||||||
Numerator | |||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (38,148 | ) | $ | (27,017 | ) | $ | (30,406 | ) | ||
Denominator | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | 168,294 | 180,968 | 205,273 | ||||||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | ||
91
The following potential common shares outstanding were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because including them would have been anti-dilutive:
As of January 31, 2013 | As of December 31, 2013 | As of December 31, 2014 | ||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Options to purchase common stock | 26,103 | 22,708 | 10,980 | |||||
Restricted stock units | 5,512 | 10,366 | 11,024 | |||||
Total common stock equivalents | 31,615 | 33,074 | 22,004 | |||||
92
11. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
Three months ended | Two months ended | Three months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, | July 31, | October 31, | December 31, | March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 (1) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 125,510 | $ | 157,355 | $ | 180,376 | $ | 136,992 | $ | 194,315 | $ | 218,894 | $ | 239,593 | $ | 268,000 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Revenue—Content acquisition costs | 82,853 | 81,880 | 86,989 | 63,144 | 108,275 | 111,461 | 111,315 | 115,326 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue—Other | 9,845 | 11,141 | 12,532 | 8,699 | 14,979 | 13,989 | 15,453 | 17,206 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue | 92,698 | 93,021 | 99,521 | 71,843 | 123,254 | 125,450 | 126,768 | 132,532 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 32,812 | 64,334 | 80,855 | 65,149 | 71,061 | 93,444 | 112,825 | 135,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product development | 7,312 | 8,301 | 9,244 | 6,437 | 11,831 | 13,076 | 13,381 | 14,865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 40,075 | 45,606 | 50,285 | 33,039 | 61,864 | 66,232 | 72,320 | 76,914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 13,872 | 18,061 | 22,823 | 14,544 | 26,361 | 25,865 | 29,143 | 31,074 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 61,259 | 71,968 | 82,352 | 54,020 | 100,056 | 105,173 | 114,844 | 122,853 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (28,447 | ) | (7,634 | ) | (1,497 | ) | 11,129 | (28,995 | ) | (11,729 | ) | (2,019 | ) | 12,615 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | (28,587 | ) | (7,787 | ) | (1,700 | ) | 11,057 | (28,931 | ) | (11,728 | ) | (2,025 | ) | 12,278 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share, basic | (0.16 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | 0.06 | (0.14 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.01 | ) | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share, diluted | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |||||||||
(1) We changed our fiscal year from the twelve months ending January 31 to the calendar twelve months ending December 31, effective beginning with the year ended December 31, 2013. Therefore, for financial reporting purposes our fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year was shortened from the three months ended January 31 to the two months ended December 31. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
93
12. Subsequent Event
Subsequent to December 31, 2014, we entered into a sublease agreement to increase our leased space at our corporate headquarters in Oakland, California. This agreement is expected to result in an additional operating lease obligation of approximately $7.6 million through 2020.
94
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation at the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2014.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of internal control effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent annual period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
95
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information required by this Item regarding our directors and executive officers is incorporated by reference to the sections of our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") entitled "Election of Class III Directors" and "Management."
Information required by this Item regarding our corporate governance, including our audit committee and code of business conduct and ethics, is incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled "Corporate Governance" and "Board of Directors."
Information required by this Item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance."
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled "Executive Compensation," "Board of Directors—Compensation of Directors," "Corporate Governance—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation."
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."
Information regarding our stockholder approved and non-approved equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Equity Compensation Plan Information."
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" and "Corporate Governance-Director Independence."
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled "Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm."
96
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are included as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1. Index to Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All other schedules are omitted as the information required is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the related notes.
3. Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
97
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February 11, 2015.
PANDORA MEDIA, INC. | ||||
By: | /s/ BRIAN MCANDREWS | |||
Name: | Brian McAndrews | |||
Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board | |||
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Brian McAndrews, Michael S. Herring and Stephen Bené and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act separately and full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them or his or her or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
98
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ BRIAN MCANDREWS | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) | February 11, 2015 | ||
Brian McAndrews | ||||
/s/ MICHAEL S. HERRING | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | February 11, 2015 | ||
Michael S. Herring | ||||
/s/ PETER CHERNIN | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
Peter Chernin | ||||
/s/ JAMES M. P. FEUILLE | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
James M. P. Feuille | ||||
/s/ PETER GOTCHER | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
Peter Gotcher | ||||
/s/ ROBERT KAVNER | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
Robert Kavner | ||||
/s/ ELIZABETH A. NELSON | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
Elizabeth A. Nelson | ||||
/s/ DAVID SZE | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
David Sze | ||||
/s/ TIM WESTERGREN | Director | February 11, 2015 | ||
Tim Westergren | ||||
99
EXHIBIT INDEX
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||||||
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | Filed By | Filed Herewith | ||||||||
3.01 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 3.1 | 5/4/2011 | ||||||||||
3.02 | Amended and Restated Bylaws | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 3.2 | 5/4/2011 | ||||||||||
4.01 | Fifth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, by and among Pandora Media, Inc. and the investors listed on Exhibit A thereto, dated May 20, 2010, as amended | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 4.2 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.01† | 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2011 Long Term Incentive Plan | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.1 | 5/26/2011 | ||||||||||
10.02† | 2011 Corporate Incentive Plan | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.2 | 5/4/2011 | ||||||||||
10.03† | 2004 Stock Plan, as amended, and Forms of Stock Option Agreement and Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under 2004 Stock Plan | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.3 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.04† | 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and Forms of NSO Stock Option Agreement and ISO Stock Option Agreement under 2000 Stock Plan | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.4 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.05† | Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Pandora Media, Inc. and each of its executive officers and its directors not affiliated with an investment fund | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.5 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.06† | Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Pandora Media, Inc. and each of its directors affiliated with an investment fund | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.5A | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.7† | Employment Agreement with Tim Westergren, dated April 28, 2004 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.7 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.8† | Offer Letter with Thomas Conrad, dated November 12, 2004 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.9 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.9† | Offer Letter with John Trimble, dated February 18, 2009 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.1 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.10 | Office Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated July 23, 2009 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.12 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.10A | First Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated April 13, 2010 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.12A | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.10B | Second Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated June 16, 2010 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.12B | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.10C | Third Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated December 15, 2010 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12C | 9/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.10D | Fourth Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated March 10, 2011 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12D | 9/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.10E | Fifth Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated July 1, 2011 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12E | 9/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.10F | Sixth Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated September 27, 2011 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12F | 9/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.10G | Seventh Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated July 12, 2012 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12G | 9/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.10H | Eighth Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated February 1, 2013 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12H | 5/29/2013 | ||||||||||
100
10.10I | Ninth Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated August 15, 2013 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12I | 10/27/2014 | ||||||||||
10.10J | Tenth Amendment to Lease between CIM/Oakland Center 21, LP and Pandora Media, Inc., dated October 1, 2014 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.12J | 10/27/2014 | ||||||||||
10.10K | Sublease between Cerexa, Inc. and Pandora Media, Inc. dated January 1, 2015 | X | |||||||||||||
10.11 | Web Site Performance Agreement by and between Broadcast Music, Inc. and Savage Beast Technologies, Inc., dated June 30, 2005 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.13 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.12 | License Agreement by and between SESAC and Pandora Media, Inc., dated July 1, 2007 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.14 | 2/22/2011 | ||||||||||
10.13 | Credit Agreement among Pandora Media, Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, dated as of May 13, 2011 | S-1/A | 333-172215 | 10.17 | 6/10/2011 | ||||||||||
10.13A | Amendment and Restatement Agreement to Credit Agreement among Pandora Media, Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, dated as of September 12, 2013 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.15 | 11/26/2013 | ||||||||||
10.14† | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.01 | 9/2/2011 | ||||||||||
10.15† | Amended Executive Severance and Change in Control Policy | 10-K | 001-35198 | 10.18 | 3/19/2012 | ||||||||||
10.16† | Offer Letter with Simon Fleming-Wood, dated August 5, 2012 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.19 | 6/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.17† | 2013 Corporate Incentive Plan | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.20 | 6/4/2012 | ||||||||||
10.17B† | 2014 Corporate Incentive Plan | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.19B | 8/26/2013 | ||||||||||
10.17C† | Calendar 2014 Corporate Incentive Plan | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.19C | 4/29/2014 | ||||||||||
10.20† | Australian Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan | 10-K | 001-35198 | 10.22 | 3/18/2013 | ||||||||||
10.21† | Offer Letter with Michael Herring, dated December 21, 2012 | 10-K | 001-35198 | 10.23 | 3/18/2013 | ||||||||||
10.22† | New Zealand Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.24 | 5/29/2013 | ||||||||||
10.23† | Offer Letter with Brian McAndrews, dated September 11, 2013 | 10-Q | 001-35198 | 10.25 | 11/26/2013 | ||||||||||
10.24A† | 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | S-8 | 333-193612 | 99.2 | 1/28/2014 | ||||||||||
23.01 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | X | |||||||||||||
24.01 | Power of Attorney (included on signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) | X | |||||||||||||
31.01 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | X | |||||||||||||
31.02 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | X | |||||||||||||
32.01 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | X | |||||||||||||
101
101 | Interactive Data Files Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, (ii) Statements of Operations for the Twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the Eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the Twelve months ended January 31, 2013 (iii) Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the Eleven months Ended December 31, 2013 and the Twelve months ended January 31, 2013, (iv) Statements of Cash Flows for the Twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the Eleven months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the Twelve months ended January 31, 2013 and (v) Notes to Financial Statements | X | |||||||||||||
† | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan. | ||||||||||||||
102