U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 40-F
(Check One)
| ¨ | Registration statement pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Or
| x | Annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
Commission File Number: 001-13425
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| Not Applicable | Canada | Not Applicable | ||
| (Translation of Registrant’s Name Into | (Province or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification | ||
| English (if Applicable)) | Incorporation or Organization) | Number (if Applicable)) |
7389
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number (if Applicable))
9500 Glenlyon Parkway, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5J 0C6 (778) 331-5500
(Address and Telephone Number of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc., 15500 Eastex Frwy, Humble, TX, 77396, (713) 455-5200
(Name, Address (Including Zip Code) and Telephone Number (Including Area Code) of Agent For Service in the United States)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class |
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
| Common Shares | New York Stock Exchange; Toronto Stock Exchange |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Not Applicable
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
Not Applicable
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
| x Annual information form | x Audited annual financial statements |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Common Shares: 106,596,811
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by filing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If “Yes” is marked, please indicate the filing number assigned to the Registrant in connection with such Rule. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
The Annual Report on Form 40-F shall be incorporated by reference into or as an exhibit to, as applicable, each of the Registrant’s Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933: Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333 – 65533 and 333 –71577).
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 40-F and documents incorporated by reference contain forward-looking statements (as such term is defined under the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on current expectations and estimates about our business, and include, among others, statements relating to:
| • | our future performance and financial objectives; |
| • | impact of market uncertainty on equipment seller behaviour; |
| • | competition in the used equipment market; |
| • | anticipated pricing environment for late model equipment; |
| • | growth of our operations, including replacement of existing auction sites and adding new auction sites; |
| • | growth potential in established and emerging markets; |
| • | our internet initiatives and the level of participation in our auctions by internet bidders, including the timing of the next major release and full commercial launch of our new online marketplace; |
| • | integration of AssetNation’s personnel, technology and e-commerce expertise to reach new segments of the equipment market; |
| • | growth of used equipment and truck markets; |
| • | increases in the number of consignors and bidders participating in our auctions; |
| • | our principal operating strengths, our competitive advantages, and the appeal of our auctions to buyers and sellers of industrial assets; |
| • | our ability to draw consistently significant numbers of local and international end-user bidders to our auctions; |
| • | our ability to continue to grow our share of the used equipment market and to meet the needs of our customers; |
| • | our ability to partner with our customers and potential customers; |
| • | our ability to utilize the excess capacity in our sales team and auction site network to help sustain our growth; |
| • | our ability to grow our core auction business, including our ability to increase our market share with traditional customer groups and do more business with new customer groups in new markets, among others; |
| • | our ability to add new business and information solutions, including, among others, utilizing technology to enhance our auction services and support additional value added services; |
| • | our ability to perform by building an inspired high-performance customer focused team, to improve sales force productivity and growth in our sales force; |
| • | our ability to improve sales force productivity, employee engagement and management bench strength and increase operational efficiency of our sales and operations teams; |
| • | our ability to leverage our Ritchie Bros. brand; |
1
| • | the relative percentage of Gross Auction Proceeds represented by straight commission, guarantee and inventory contracts, and its impact on auction revenues and profitability; |
| • | our auction revenue rates, the sustainability of those rates, the impact of our commission rate and fee changes, and the seasonality of Gross Auction Proceeds and auction revenues; |
| • | our direct expense and income tax rates, depreciation and amortization expenses and general and administrative expenses; |
| • | our future capital expenditures; |
| • | our future plans with regard to our strategic pillars; |
| • | the proportion of our revenues and operating costs denominated in currencies other than the US dollar or the effect of any currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations on our results of operations; |
| • | the impact of our new initiatives and services on us and our customers; and |
| • | financing available to us and the sufficiency of our working capital to meet our financial needs. |
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by such words as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “feel”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “ongoing”, “plan”, “potential”, “predict”, “will”, “should”, “would”, “could”, “likely”, “generally”, “future”, “period to period”, “long term”, or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. While we have not described all potential risks related to our business and owning our common shares, the important factors listed under “Risk Factors” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” attached in Exhibit 3 to this Report on Form 40-F are among those that we consider may affect our performance significantly or could cause our actual financial and operational results to differ significantly from our predictions. Except as required by applicable securities law and regulations of relevant securities exchanges, we do not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if our predictions have been affected by new information, future events or other developments. You should consider our forward-looking statements in light of these and other relevant factors.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of Ritchie Bros.’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Furthermore, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s CEO and CFO, overseen by the Company’s Board of Directors and implemented by the Company’s management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on its assessment under the framework in “Internal Control –Integrated Framework”, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their report which is attached hereto as part of Exhibit 2.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that it has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee. Ms. Beverley Briscoe has been determined to be such audit committee financial expert and is independent, as that term is defined by the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance listing standards applicable to the Company for Audit Committee membership. The SEC has indicated that the designation of Ms. Briscoe as an audit committee financial expert: (1) does not make Ms. Briscoe an “expert” for any purpose; (2) impose any duties, obligations or liability on Ms. Briscoe that are greater than those imposed on members of the Audit Committee and Board of Directors who do not carry this designation, or (3) affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or Board of Directors.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all employees, officers and directors. The Code of Conduct includes, among other things, written standards for the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer that are required by the SEC for a code of ethics applicable to such officers. The Code of Conduct is available at the Company’s internet website, www.rbauction.com or by telephoning the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 778-331-5500. The Company intends to disclose on its website within five days following the date of any such amendment or waiver, any amendment or waiver of the code of ethics portion of its Code of Conduct applicable to these officers that is required by SEC rules or regulations to be disclosed publicly, and to keep such disclosure available on the website for at least a 12-month period.
3
Principal Accountant Fees And Services
KPMG LLP and predecessor firms have served as Ritchie Bros.’ auditing firm since 1974. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP and its affiliates during fiscal 2012 and 2011 are detailed below.
| Fiscal 2012 | Fiscal 2011 | |||||||
| Audit Fees |
$ | 1,311,200 | $ | 1,228,200 | ||||
| Audit-Related Fees |
— | 29,400 | ||||||
| Tax Fees |
275,800 | 630,900 | ||||||
| All Other Fees |
— | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total Fees |
$ | 1,587,000 | $ | 1,888,500 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
The nature of each category of fees is as follows:
Audit Fees:
Audit fees were paid for professional services rendered by the auditors for the audit and interim reviews of the Company’s consolidated financial statements or services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees:
Audit-related fees were paid for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under the Audit Fees item above.
Tax Fees:
Tax fees were paid for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning professional services. These services consisted of: tax compliance, including the review of original and amended tax returns; assistance with questions regarding tax audits; assistance in completing routine tax schedules and calculations; and tax planning and advisory services relating to common forms of domestic and international taxation (i.e., income tax, capital tax, Goods and Services Tax and Value Added Tax).
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures:
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence and has adopted a policy governing the provision of these services. This policy requires the pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all audit and non-audit services provided by the external auditor, other than any de minimus non-audit services allowed by applicable law or regulation. The policy outlines the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which permissible services proposed to be performed by KPMG LLP are pre-approved, provides a general pre-approval for certain permissible services and for subsequent reporting to the Audit Committee, and outlines a list of prohibited services.
All requests for KPMG LLP to provide services that do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee are reported to and documented by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. If the proposed services are not covered by a pre-approval and the estimated fees for the proposed engagement are more than CA$5,000, the engagement of KPMG LLP to provide such services requires specific approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed engagement to provide services that requires specific approval by the Audit Committee pursuant to the terms of the policy is submitted to the Chief Financial Officer for presentation to the Audit Committee for its consideration.
4
Additional Corporate Governance Information
Additional information regarding the Company’s corporate governance practices is included in its Information Circular for the 2012 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders and on the Company’s internet website at www.rbauction.com. Any foreign private issuer listed on the NYSE is required to report any significant ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those required for United States companies under NYSE listing standards. The Company is in conformance with the NYSE corporate governance requirements applicable to United States companies.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information about the Company’s aggregate known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
| Payments Due by Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| In 2014 | In 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | In 2013 | and 2015 | and 2017 | After 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt obligations |
$ | 200,746 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 61,171 | $ | 60,326 | $ | 64,249 | ||||||||||
| Interest on long-term debt obligations |
37,930 | 7,663 | 12,841 | 6,377 | 11,049 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating leases obligations |
137,808 | 9,734 | 16,452 | 15,460 | 96,162 | |||||||||||||||
| Other long-term obligations |
661 | 661 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations |
$ | 377,145 | $ | 33,058 | $ | 90,464 | $ | 82,163 | $ | 171,460 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
The Company’s long-term debt included in the table above is comprised mainly of term loans put in place in 2005 with original terms to maturity of five years, which were subsequently extended, a revolving loan drawn under a credit facility that is available until January 2014, as well as a term loan put in place in 2009 with a term to maturity of seven years. The Company’s operating leases relate primarily to land on which it operates regional auction sites and administrative buildings. These properties are located in Canada, the U.S.A., the Netherlands, Spain, Germany, the U.K., Australia, China, Dubai, Turkey, Mexico and Panama.
Audit Committee
The Company’s Board of Directors has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the purpose of overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the Company’s annual financial statements. As of the date of this Report, the members of the Audit Committee include Eric Patel, Beverley A. Briscoe, Edward B. Pitoniak, and Robert G. Elton. Ms. Briscoe serves as Chair of the Committee.
5
Undertaking
The Company undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the SEC staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the SEC staff, information relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.
6
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
| RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED | ||
| By: | /s/ DARREN WATT | |
| Name: Darren Watt | ||
| Title: Corporate Secretary | ||
Date: February 26, 2013
7
EXHIBIT INDEX
| Exhibit |
Description | |
| 1. | Annual Information Form of the Registrant dated February 26, 2012. | |
| 2. | The following audited consolidated financial statements of the Registrant, together with the independent auditors’ reports dated February 22, 2013 of KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants: | |
| a. Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011; | ||
| b. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011; | ||
| c. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011; | ||
| d. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011; | ||
| e. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31 2012 and 2011; and | ||
| f. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||
| 3. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2012. | |
| 4. | Consent dated February 22, 2013 of KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants. | |
| 31.1 | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 31.2 | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.1 | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.2 | Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. | |
8