Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number 000-52026

 

 

LOOPNET, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   77-0463987

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

185 Berry Street, Suite 4000

San Francisco, CA 94107

(Address of principal executive offices)

(415) 243-4200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

        Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
        Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of April 16, 2012, there were 35,495,846 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page  

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited):

  

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012

     3   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three month periods ended March  31, 2011 and 2012

     4   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three month periods ended March  31, 2011 and 2012

     5   

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     6   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     12   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     19   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     19   

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

     20   

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     20   

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     20   

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     30   

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

     30   

Item 6. Exhibits

     30   

SIGNATURES

     31   

EXHIBIT INDEX

     32   

 

EX-31.1

EX-31.2

EX-32.1

EX-32.2

EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT

EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT

EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT

EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

2


Table of Contents

LOOPNET, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

 

     December 31,
2011
    March 31,
2012
 
           (Unaudited)  

Assets

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 107,573      $ 114,962   

Short-term investments

     3,529        3,566   

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $318 and $408, respectively

     1,899        2,325   

Income tax receivable

     11,045        9,544   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,445        2,201   

Deferred income taxes, net

     696        696   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     126,187        133,294   

Property and equipment, net

     3,165        2,877   

Goodwill

     41,507        41,507   

Intangibles, net

     6,385        5,846   

Deferred income taxes, net, non-current

     16,758        15,595   

Deposits and other non-current assets

     5,258        4,681   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 199,260      $ 203,800   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 656      $ 680   

Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities

     5,765        4,353   

Accrued compensation and benefits

     4,049        2,776   

Deferred revenue

     9,422        10,063   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     19,892        17,872   

Other long-term liabilities

     1,768        1,937   

Commitments and contingencies

    

Series A convertible preferred stock

     48,885        48,970   

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Common stock, $.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized; 35,053,190 and 35,472,661 shares outstanding, respectively

     43        43   

Additional paid in capital

     154,289        158,193   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (423     (398

Treasury stock, at cost, 7,682,962 shares

     (86,227     (86,227

Retained earnings

     61,033        63,410   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     128,715        135,021   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 199,260      $ 203,800   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

LOOPNET, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

     Three months ended March 31,  
         2011             2012      
     (Unaudited)  

Revenues

   $ 20,713      $ 22,927   

Cost of revenue (1)

     3,157        3,368   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

     17,556        19,559   

Operating expenses:

    

Sales and marketing (1)

     5,134        5,665   

Technology and product development (1)

     3,659        3,779   

General and administrative (1)

     4,924        5,232   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     641        538   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     14,358        15,214   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

     3,198        4,345   

Interest and other (expense) income, net

     (317     (687
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before tax

     2,881        3,658   

Income tax expense

     1,038        1,196   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

     1,843        2,462   

Convertible preferred stock accretion of discount

     (85     (85
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income applicable to common stockholders

   $ 1,758      $ 2,377   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per share applicable to common shareholders:

    

Basic

   $ 0.04      $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   $ 0.04      $ 0.05   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shares used in per share calculations:

    

Basic

     39,791        42,677   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

     41,881        44,502   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

   $ 1,849      $ 2,487   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)    Stock-based compensation is allocated as follows:

       

Cost of revenue

   $ 130      $ 128   

Sales and marketing

     585        385   

Technology and product development

     801        392   

General and administrative

     994        780   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

LOOPNET, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

     Three months ended March 31,  
     2011     2012  
     (Unaudited)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 1,843      $ 2,462   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization expense

     995        973   

Stock-based compensation

     2,510        1,685   

Tax benefits from exercise of stock options

     (165     (11

Deferred income tax

     704        1,375   

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

     (250     (426

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     320        1,974   

Accounts payable

     348        24   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     (73     (1,241

Accrued compensation and benefits

     (991     (1,274

Deferred revenue

     555        641   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     5,796        6,182   

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Purchase of property and equipment

     (900     (147

Purchase of investments

     (500     (865
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,400     (1,012

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Net proceeds from exercise of stock options

     960        2,984   

Tax withholdings related to net share settlements of restricted stock units

     (482     (776

Repurchase of common stock

     (7     —     

Tax benefits from exercise of stock options

     165        11   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

     636        2,219   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     5,032        7,389   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     88,773        107,573   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 93,805      $ 114,962   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Background and Basis of Presentation

The Company

LoopNet, Inc. (“we,” the “Company” or “LoopNet”) was incorporated under the laws of the state of California on June 2, 1997, and was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in May 2006.

We own and operate the leading online marketplace for commercial real estate in the United States, based on the number of monthly unique visitors to our marketplace, which averaged approximately 2.1 million during the first quarter of 2012, compared with approximately 2.0 million during 2011, and approximately 1.5 million during 2010, as reported by comScore Media Metrix. comScore Media Metrix defines a unique visitor as an individual who visited any content of a website, a category, a channel, or an application. Our online marketplace, available at www.LoopNet.com, enables commercial real estate agents, working on behalf of property owners and landlords, to list properties for sale or for lease and submit detailed information on property listings including qualitative descriptions, financial and tenant information, photographs and key property characteristics, in order to find a buyer or tenant. Commercial real estate agents, buyers and tenants use the LoopNet online marketplace to search for available property listings that meet their commercial real estate criteria. By connecting the sources of commercial real estate supply and demand in an efficient manner, we believe that our online marketplace enables commercial real estate participants to initiate and complete more transactions more cost-effectively than through other means. As of March 31, 2012, the LoopNet online marketplace contained 826,765 listings.

The Company derives most of its revenue from customers that pay fees for a suite of services to market and search for commercial real estate and operating businesses. These services include a premium membership that gives the customer unlimited access to listings, maximized exposure for their listings along with enhanced services to market their listings.

On April 27, 2011, LoopNet and the CoStar Group, Inc. (“CoStar”) announced the signing of a merger agreement for the acquisition of LoopNet by CoStar (the “Merger”), which was approved by LoopNet’s stockholders at a special meeting on July 11, 2011. On April 26, 2012, the FTC accepted the consent order that was previously agreed between and among the staff of the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), LoopNet and CoStar. The consent order is subject to a 30-day public comment period and then final acceptance by the FTC. However, there are no further regulatory approvals required to complete the merger of the Company and CoStar, as the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 as amended (the “HSR Act”) was terminated upon the FTC’s acceptance of the consent order. Completion of the Merger remains subject to satisfaction or waiver of the other closing conditions specified in the merger agreement. See “Note 9—Pending Merger with CoStar” for more information.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2012, the statements of comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 and the statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 are unaudited. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial position and results of operations, contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and include normal and recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position for the periods presented. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012. The Company has evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the financial statement issuance date for appropriate accounting and disclosure.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue, costs and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued new disclosure guidance related to the presentation of the Statement of Comprehensive Income. This guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. The requirement to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the consolidated statement of income has been deferred. The effective date for this guidance is reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this accounting standard upon its effective date, and this adoption did not have any impact on the financial position or results of operations but impacted the financial statement presentation.

 

6


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 2 — Earnings Per Share (EPS)

The share count used to compute basic and diluted net income per share is calculated as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March  31,
 
         2011              2012      
     (Unaudited)  

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     32,351         35,237   

Convertible preferred stock

     7,440         7,440   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Shares used to compute basic net income applicable to common shareholders

     39,791         42,677   

Add dilutive common equivalents:

     

Stock options

     1,489         1,279   

Restricted stock units

     601         546   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Shares used to compute diluted net income applicable to common shareholders

     41,881         44,502   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following is a summary of the securities outstanding during the respective periods that have been excluded from the calculations because the effect on earnings per share would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended  
     March 31,  
         2011              2012      
     (Unaudited)  

Stock options

         3,721                 296    

Restricted stock units

     —           —     

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS (in thousands, except per share data):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
         2011             2012      
     (Unaudited)  

Calculation of basic net income per share applicable to common shareholders:

    

Net income

   $ 1,843      $ 2,462   

Convertible preferred stock accretion of discount

     (85     (85
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income applicable to common shareholders

   $ 1,758      $ 2,377   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shares used to compute basic net income applicable to common shareholders

     39,791        42,677   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic net income per share applicable to common shareholders

   $ 0.04      $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Calculation of diluted net income per share applicable to common shareholders:

    

Net income

   $ 1,843      $ 2,462   

Convertible preferred stock accretion of discount

     (85     (85
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income applicable to common shareholders

   $ 1,758      $ 2,377   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shares used to compute diluted net income applicable to common shareholders

     41,881        44,502   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dilutive net income per share applicable to common shareholders

   $ 0.04      $ 0.05   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

7


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 3 — Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company completed a $50 million private placement to accredited investors in 2009. The Company sold an aggregate of 50,000 shares of its newly-created Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), which is initially convertible into an aggregate of 7,440,476 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), at a conversion price of $6.72 per share (as may be adjusted for stock dividends, stock splits or similar recapitalizations). Holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, prior to any distribution to the holders of the Common Stock, an amount per share equal to the greater of (1) the Original Issue Price, plus any declared and unpaid dividends and (2) the amount that Purchasers would receive in respect of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock if all of the then outstanding Series A Preferred Stock were converted into Common Stock.

The net proceeds of $48 million from the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock are net of issuance costs of $2 million. The Series A Preferred Stock reported on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet consists of the net proceeds plus the amount of accretion for issuance costs. Such accretion costs are being accreted over 72 months with such accretion being recorded as a reduction in retained earnings. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded accretion on the issuance costs of $85,000.

Note 4 — Stock Plan

Stock Plan Activity

Stock options and other equity awards are granted by the Company under its 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan became effective on June 9, 2006. Prior to that date, stock options were granted under the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan, which terminated on June 9, 2006. Due to the pending Merger, stock option and other equity award grants were suspended.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity is as follows:

 

     Options Outstanding      Options Exercisable  
     Number of
Shares
    Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
     Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
     Number of
Shares
     Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
     Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

     5,137,158      $ 10.81         4.5         1,868,539       $ 11.87         3.4   

Granted

     —        $ —                 

Exercised

     (297,410   $ 10.03               

Cancelled

     (16,443   $ 14.52               
  

 

 

               

Outstanding at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)

     4,823,305      $ 10.85         4.3         1,841,196       $ 11.84         3.0   
  

 

 

               

Included in the options outstanding at March 31, 2012 are 1,415,000 shares of performance-based options awarded to its executive officers by the Board of Directors. These options are tied to incentivizing execution of the Company’s long-term strategic plan. The Company is unable to assess the likelihood of achieving the strategic plan at this time and therefore the recognition of the compensation expense for these options has been deferred.

 

8


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock unit activity is as follows:

 

     Unvested Restricted Stock Units  
     Number of Shares     Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
     Weighted
Average

Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 

Balance at December 31, 2011

     1,071,125      $ 10.31         3.3   

Granted

     —        $ —        

Vested

     (166,875   $ 10.31      

Cancelled

     —        $ —        
  

 

 

      

Outstanding at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)

     904,250      $ 10.32         3.6   
  

 

 

      

Included in the restricted stock units outstanding at March 31, 2012 are 573,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock units awarded to its executive officers by the Board of Directors. These restricted stock units are tied to incentivizing execution of the Company’s long-term strategic plan. The Company is unable to assess the likelihood of achieving the strategic plan at this time and therefore the recognition of the compensation expense for these options has been deferred.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company applies FASB authoritative guidance ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, surrounding share-based compensation. The guidance requires that share-based payment transactions with employees be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

In connection with this authoritative guidance, the Company reviewed and updated, among other things, its forfeiture rate, expected life and volatility assumptions. Commencing January 1, 2011, the Company began estimating the weighted average expected life of the options based upon the historical exercise behavior of our employees. Prior to January 1, 2011, the Company used the simplified method to calculate the weighted average expected life of the options. There was no significant impact as a result of this change. Estimated volatility also reflects the application of the authoritative guidance and, accordingly, incorporates historical volatility of similar entities whose share prices are publicly available. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions:

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
 
         2011             2012      
     (Unaudited)  

Risk-free interest rate

     2.12     n/a   

Expected volatility

     48     n/a   

Expected life (in years)

     4.0        n/a   

Dividend yield

     0     n/a   

The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 was $4.62, using the Black-Scholes method. Due to the pending Merger, stock option and other equity award grants were suspended.

The total stock-based compensation has been allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three months ended
March  31,
 
     2011      2012  
     (Unaudited)  

Cost of revenue

   $ 130       $ 128   

Sales and marketing

     585         385   

Technology and product development

     801         392   

General and administrative

     994         780   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,510       $ 1,685   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 6 — Income Taxes

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2012, based upon a 32.7% effective tax rate. The effective tax rate is based upon the Company’s estimated fiscal 2012 income before the provision for income taxes. To the extent the estimate of fiscal 2012 income before the provision for income taxes changes, the Company’s provision for income taxes will change as well.

Note 7 — Stock Repurchases

The Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock on February 5, 2008 and an additional authorized level of $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock on July 30, 2008. During 2008, the Company repurchased $54.6 million of the Company’s common stock. In February 2010, the Board approved the repurchase of up to an additional $29.6 million in shares of the Company’s common stock, bringing to $75.0 million the total amount of authorized Common Stock repurchases, of which $43.3 million remained available as of March 31, 2012.

The stock repurchase program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market and privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as management deems appropriate and will be funded using the Company’s working capital. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including corporate and regulatory requirements, price and other market conditions. The program is intended to comply with the volume, timing and other limitations set forth in Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Note 8 — Litigation and Other Contingencies

Litigation and Other Legal Matters

On January 3, 2012, LoopNet was sued by CIVIX-DDI, LLC (“Civix”) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,385,622 and 6,415,291. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, attorney fees and costs. On February 16, 2012, LoopNet filed an answer to Civix’s compliant and filed counterclaims against Civix seeking, among other things, declaratory relief that the asserted patents are invalid, not infringed, and that Civix committed inequitable conduct during the prosecution and re-examination of the asserted patents. On February 21, 2012, Civix filed a motion to dismiss and strike LoopNet’s counterclaims. LoopNet opposed the motion, and the motion was fully briefed and submitted to the court on March 8, 2012. The district court has not ruled on the motion. On March 22, 2012, the district court scheduled trial for November 2012. Discovery has just begun in the case and the parties have made initial disclosures as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At this time, LoopNet cannot predict the outcome of this case, but intends to vigorously defend itself.

On January 18, 2012, an entity called Earthcomber, LLC filed a lawsuit against LoopNet in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,589,628. The complaint sought unspecified damages, attorneys fees and costs. LoopNet was never served with a copy of the summons and complaint for this lawsuit. On March 12, 2012, Earthcomber, LLC voluntarily dismissed this lawsuit, without prejudice, and without any response having been filed by LoopNet.

Currently and from time to time, we are involved in disputes and litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. While we cannot assure you as to the ultimate outcome of any legal proceedings, we are not currently party to any legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 9 — Pending Merger with CoStar

Merger Agreement with CoStar Group, Inc.

On April 27, 2011, the Company entered into a Merger Agreement with CoStar and Merger Subsidiary, pursuant to which Merger Subsidiary will be merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CoStar.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock will be converted into the right to receive a unit consisting of (i) $16.50 in cash, without interest (the “Common Stock Cash Consideration”), and (ii) 0.03702 shares of CoStar common stock (the “Common Stock Shares Consideration” and, together with the Common Stock Cash Consideration, “Common Stock Consideration”). As previously disclosed, the holders of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock have delivered contingent conversion notices to the Company pursuant to which such shares will be converted into common stock immediately prior to, and contingent upon, the completion of the Merger. Each outstanding share of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, unless previously converted into the Company’s common stock, will be converted into the right to receive a unit consisting of (i) the product of 148.80952 multiplied by the Common Stock Cash Consideration and (ii) the product of 148.80952 multiplied by the Common Stock Shares Consideration.

 

10


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Unaudited)

 

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each of the Company’s outstanding equity awards (including stock options and restricted stock units), whether vested or unvested, will be cancelled in exchange for cash and/or shares of CoStar common stock (depending on the type of award and the exercise price of the award, if any) based on the Common Stock Consideration less, in the case of a stock option, the per share exercise price.

The Company’s board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement. On July 11, 2011, at a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders, the Merger was approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock and Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class on an as-converted basis.

As previously disclosed in the proxy statement/prospectus dated June 6, 2011, both CoStar and the Company filed notification and report forms with the Department of Justice and the FTC pursuant to the HSR Act, on May 31, 2011. As previously announced, on June 30, 2011, CoStar and the Company each received a request for additional information (commonly referred to as a “second request”) from the FTC with respect to the proposed Merger. As previously announced, on October 26, 2011, at the request of the FTC, the Company and CoStar agreed to extend the waiting period imposed by the HSR Act from 30 to 60 days after the date of substantial compliance with the second request, which was certified by the Company and CoStar on November 4, 2011. As previously announced on January 3, 2012, the Company and CoStar agreed to further extend the waiting period imposed by the HSR Act on a 45-day rolling basis to allow them to engage in discussions with the FTC to determine whether there was a possible basis for, and to discuss the possible terms of, a mutually acceptable consent order that would allow the Merger to close. In addition, as previously announced on January 31, 2012, the Company and CoStar agreed to extend the date after which either the Company or Costar may individually elect to terminate the Merger Agreement to 11:59 PM, New York City time on April 30, 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, the Merger remained subject to customary closing conditions, including antitrust clearance from the FTC. As disclosed on April 17, 2012, the Company and CoStar announced that they had reached agreement on a mutually acceptable consent order with the staff of the FTC. On April 26, 2012, the FTC accepted the consent order that was previously agreed. The consent order is subject to a 30-day public comment period and then final acceptance by the FTC. However, there are no further regulatory approvals required to complete the merger of the Company and CoStar, as the waiting period under the HSR Act was terminated upon the FTC’s acceptance of the consent order.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants by each of the Company and CoStar.

The Merger Agreement contains termination rights for both the Company and CoStar, including for the Company if its board of directors changes its recommendation of the Merger to its stockholders in connection with a superior proposal. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, the Company may be obligated to pay CoStar a termination fee of $25,800,000.

Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company’s directors and certain of its executive officers and significant stockholders entered into a voting and support agreement (the “Support Agreement”) with CoStar and the Company, and have agreed, in their capacities as stockholders of the Company, to, among other things, vote their shares of the Company’s capital stock in favor of the Merger and the Merger Agreement.

The foregoing description of the Merger, the Merger Agreement and the Support Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement and the Support Agreement, copies of which are attached as Exhibit 2.1 and Exhibit 2.2, respectively, to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 28, 2011 and which are incorporated by reference herein.

The Company cannot guarantee that the Merger will be completed or that, if completed, it will be exactly on the terms as set forth in the Merger Agreement. As of March 31, 2012, total merger related costs were $12.2 million.

 

11


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis by our management of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q . This discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Item 1A of Part II, “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We own and operate the leading online marketplace for commercial real estate in the United States, based on the number of monthly unique visitors to our marketplace, which averaged approximately 2.1 million per month during the first quarter of 2012, compared with approximately 2.0 million per month during 2011, and 1.5 million per month during 2010, as reported by comScore Media Metrix. comScore Media Metrix defines a unique visitor as an individual who visited any content of a website, a category, a channel, or an application. Our online marketplace, available at www.LoopNet.com, enables commercial real estate agents, working on behalf of property owners and landlords, to list properties for sale or for lease and submit detailed information on property listings including qualitative descriptions, financial and tenant information, photographs and key property characteristics, in order to find a buyer or tenant. Commercial real estate agents, buyers and tenants use the LoopNet online marketplace to search for available property listings that meet their commercial real estate criteria. We offer two types of memberships on the LoopNet online marketplace. Basic membership is available free-of-charge, and enables members to experience some of the benefits of the LoopNet offering, with limited functionality. LoopNet premium membership is available for a monthly subscription fee and provides enhanced marketing exposure for property listings and full access to LoopNet property listings, as well as numerous other features. The minimum term of a premium membership subscription is one month. Premium membership service remains the largest revenue contributor to our business and accounted for 64% of our revenues in the first quarter of 2012, compared with 66% in 2011 and 71% in 2010, reflecting changing market conditions, as well as our ongoing efforts to expand and develop our business beyond our core marketplace services.

Pending Acquisition by CoStar

On April 27, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement under which CoStar will acquire all of our common stock and Series A preferred stock through a merger (the “Merger”) for a unit consisting of (i) $16.50 per share in cash, without interest (the “Common Stock Cash Consideration”) and (ii) 0.03702 shares of CoStar common stock (the “Common Stock Shares Consideration”), and we will become a wholly owned subsidiary of CoStar. The holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have delivered contingent conversion notices to us pursuant to which such shares will be converted into common stock immediately prior to, and contingent upon, the completion of the Merger. Each outstanding share of our Series A Preferred Stock, unless previously converted into our common stock, will be converted into the right to receive a unit consisting of (i) the product of 148.80952 multiplied by the Common Stock Cash Consideration and (ii) the product of 148.80952 multiplied by the Common Stock Shares Consideration. The definitive agreement related to the Merger was approved by our stockholders on July 11, 2011.

Both we and CoStar filed notification and report forms with the Department of Justice and the FTC pursuant to the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), on May 31, 2011. We and CoStar each received a request for additional information (commonly referred to as a “second request”) from the FTC and certified substantial compliance with the second request on November 4, 2011. As previously disclosed on January 3, 2012, we and CoStar voluntarily agreed to extend the waiting period imposed by the HSR Act on a 45-day rolling basis to allow us to continue to engage in discussions with the FTC to determine whether there was a possible basis for, and to discuss the possible terms of, a mutually acceptable consent order that would allow the Merger to close. In addition, as previously announced on January 31, 2012, we and CoStar agreed to extend the date after which either we or Costar may individually elect to terminate the Merger Agreement to April 30, 2012.

As disclosed on April 17, 2012, we and CoStar announced that we had reached agreement on a mutually acceptable consent order with the staff of the FTC. On April 26, 2012, the FTC accepted the consent order that was previously agreed. The consent order is subject to a 30-day public comment period and then final acceptance by the FTC. However, there are no further regulatory approvals required to complete the merger of the Company and CoStar, as the waiting period under the HSR Act was terminated upon the FTC’s acceptance of the consent order.

The parties intend to close the Merger, which remains subject to the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions, on or about April 30, 2012.

Key Operating Metrics and Trends

We believe that the key metrics that are material to an analysis of our business are:

 

   

the number of our registered members;

 

   

the number of monthly unique visitors to our marketplace;

 

   

the number of our premium members;

 

12


Table of Contents
   

the average monthly subscription price paid by our premium members;

 

   

the cancellation rate of our premium members;

 

   

the number of active commercial real estate listings on our marketplace;

 

   

the number of property profiles viewed by visitors to LoopNet;

 

   

the number of unique paying subscribers to our other commercial real estate subscription products and services; and

 

   

the average monthly subscription price paid by our unique subscribers to our commercial real estate subscription products and services.

Our registered members have grown to approximately 5.8 million as of March 31, 2012, from approximately 5.5 million as of December 31, 2011, and 4.6 million as of December 31, 2010. The number of monthly unique visitors to our marketplace averaged approximately 2.1 million in the first quarter of 2012. Our premium members were 75,829 as of March 31, 2012, compared to 73,550 as of December 31, 2011, and 68,608 as of December 31, 2010. The average monthly subscription price paid by our premium members was $65.59 in the first quarter of 2012, compared to $66.39 in 2011, and $66.59 in 2010. Our average monthly cancellation rate in the first quarter of 2012 fell within the 4.5% to 6.5% range we began seeing in late 2007. We believe the higher cancellation rate seen in the last several years is primarily the result of a significant slow-down in transaction activity in the commercial real estate industry that began in the fourth quarter of 2007, due to deteriorating economic conditions and due to the “credit crunch” impacting the availability and cost of debt capital for real estate transactions. Premium membership fees have driven the majority of our growth in revenues since 2001 and were the source of approximately 64% of our revenue in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 66% of our revenues in 2011, and 71% in 2010. The number of listings on our marketplace has increased to 826,765 as of March 31, 2012, from 820,391 as of December 31, 2011, and 788,330 as of December 31, 2010. The number of property profiles that were viewed by visitors of LoopNet grew to 112.8 million in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 76.5 million in the first quarter of 2011. The number of unique paying subscribers to one or more of our commercial real estate related products and services (i.e. Premium Membership, Property Comps, Property Facts, Professional Profile, LandsofAmerica, and LandAndFarm) was 97,944 as of March 31, 2012, and the average monthly revenue per unique paying subscriber during the period ending March 31, 2012 was $60.19.

The commercial real estate (“CRE”) industry has experienced and continues to experience challenging times, although certain segments of our industry have shown signs of increasing stabilization and modest improvement in transaction volumes. Industry-wide improvement, however, has been uneven, with most segments of the industry, particularly those involving smaller property transactions, remaining weak as compared to normalized historical standards. To capitalize on the CRE industry’s shifting dynamics in 2012 and beyond, we are currently focused on initiatives to increase our long-term value and expand the breadth and depth of the products and services we provide to our customers, which we believe will extend our leadership position and maximize our opportunities. To this end, we have been increasing the rate of investment in our business through execution of our strategy and business plan, ongoing investments in our existing products and services, investments in new organic initiatives.

While we continued investing in our business throughout 2009 and 2010, during the worst commercial real estate cycle in decades, we did so cautiously in light of uncertainties around the magnitude of the decline, and the timing of recovery, in the CRE industry. However, as we began seeing early, albeit uneven, indications that activity levels in the industry may be stabilizing and in some segments, improving, we accelerated our investment plans to capitalize on the potential longer-term opportunities. In 2011 and the first quarter of 2012, we invested several million dollars on a range of internal and external investments that we believe will complement and extend our business and, over time, create meaningful long-term shareholder value. Some of these investments are accelerations of ongoing efforts in areas that we have highlighted previously, such as our efforts to aggregate market and searching activity in our CRE, business-for-sale and land-for-sale marketplaces, aggregate more on-market available properties, organically develop new services aimed at increasing the scope of information we deliver to an expanded set of customers, our ongoing strategic investment in Xceligent, a provider of fully researched information services to CRE professionals, and various efforts to attract more demand side activity to our marketplace.

A significant area of investment for us has been our Property Facts product. Introduced in May 2010, Property Facts uses a hybrid approach that combines user-generated marketplace data with a variety of other information sources. We believe there are significant opportunities in the ability to deliver easy access to timely, useful, accurate market data at prices below traditional alternatives — particularly as we enter what we believe may be the early stage of a market recovery. We have been gathering and responding to customer feedback and continue to refine the Property Facts product. In March 2011, we began selling access to this service independent of Premium Membership in addition to continuing to offer bundles of complimentary products and services to our subscribers and customers.

 

13


Table of Contents

Property Comps, which we developed and funded internally, was another area of investment in 2011. As transaction volumes likely accelerate over the next few years, we intend to continue to expand the breadth and depth of the data coverage in this service, providing more value to existing customers and introducing the service to many new subscribers.

We are also continuing to work on upgrading and integrating technology platforms from some of the acquisitions we have done in the past, including REApplications and LandAndFarm, and BizQuest, Reaction Web and LandsofAmerica which we acquired in 2010. For example, in December 2010, we announced the release of Enterprise Deal Tools, a suite of deal management products and tools that leverages Reaction Web’s technology and enables our corporate customers to minimize back-end work associated with property marketing campaigns and transaction management.

These planned investments, which extend throughout the organization to include product development, data aggregation and information services and sales & marketing, among others, are being made to position our business for long-term growth. This investment strategy is focused on accelerating our revenue growth and market share gains, as activity in the CRE market begins to recover. While this strategy may reduce our margins in the short term, we believe our investments will increase the likelihood that we will attain our goal of becoming a substantially larger company and extend our longer-term competitive and technological advantages.

Our Revenues and Expenses

Our primary sources of revenues are:

 

   

LoopNet premium membership fees;

 

   

other property advertising fees, such as Cityfeet.com, LandsofAmerica and LandAndFarm.com;

 

   

BizBuySell and BizQuest membership fees and paid listings;

 

   

advertising on, and lead generation from, our marketplaces;

 

   

LoopLink product license fees;

 

   

LoopNet Property Comps membership fees; and

 

   

LoopNet Property Facts membership fees.

We have been profitable and cash flow positive each quarter since the second quarter of 2003. The key factors that impact our revenues are:

 

   

the adoption of our premium membership services by the commercial real estate industry and cancellation rates;

 

   

the average monthly subscription price of our premium membership product;

 

   

the adoption of our Property Comps and Property Facts services and other new products and services by the commercial real estate industry; and

 

   

the adoption of our services by the operating business for sale industry.

We derive the substantial majority of our revenues from customers that pay monthly fees for a suite of services to market and search for commercial real estate and operating businesses. The fee for our LoopNet premium membership averaged $65.59 per month during the first quarter of 2012, compared to $66.39 per month during 2011, and $66.59 during 2010. The minimum term of a premium membership subscription is one month. We also offer quarterly and annual memberships which are priced and discounted accordingly, and paid in advance for the subscription period. A customer choosing to cancel a discounted annual or quarterly membership will receive a refund based on the number of months the membership was used and charging the customer at the monthly rate rather than at the discounted quarterly or annual rates.

We also generate revenue from Property Comps, by charging a flat monthly fee to access our database of recent commercial real estate transactions or a per transaction fee for individual transactions; Property Facts, for which we charge a flat monthly fee to access our database of commercial property information or a per property record fee for individual property record purchases; LoopLink, which we license to commercial real estate brokerage firms who pay a monthly, quarterly or annual fee; and, BizBuySell and BizQuest, for which we charge a flat monthly fee for business brokers to market their listings or a per listing fee for owners to market their own listings. Revenues from other sources include advertising and lead generation revenues from both our LoopNet and business-for-sale marketplaces, which are recognized ratably over the period in which the advertisement is displayed, provided that no significant obligations remain and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. Advertising rates are dependent on the services provided and the placement of the advertisements. To date, the duration of our advertising commitments has generally averaged two to three months.

 

14


Table of Contents

The largest component of our expenses is personnel costs. Personnel costs consist of salaries, benefits and incentive compensation for our employees, including commissions for salespeople. These expenses are categorized in our statements of operations based on each employee’s principal function.

Seasonality and Cyclicality

The commercial real estate market is influenced by annual seasonality factors, as well as by overall economic cycles. The market is large and fragmented, and different segments of the industry are influenced differently by various factors. Broadly speaking, the commercial real estate industry has two major components: tenants leasing space from owners or landlords, and the investment market for buying and selling properties.

We have experienced seasonality in our business in the past, and expect to continue to experience it in the future. While individual geographic markets vary, commercial real estate transaction activity is fairly consistent throughout the year, with the exception of a slow-down during the end-of-year holiday period.

The commercial real estate industry has historically experienced cyclicality. The different segments of the industry, such as office, industrial, retail, multi-family, and others, are influenced differently by different factors, and have historically moved through cycles with different timing. The “for lease” and “for sale” components of the market also do not necessarily move on the same timing cycle. Since the second half of 2007, the commercial real estate industry has slowed significantly, due to deteriorating economic conditions and due to the “credit crunch” impacting the availability and cost of debt capital for real estate transactions compared to historical norms, although we believe that modest growth in activity levels are returning but at a fairly gradual pace.

Results of Operations

The following table presents our historical operating results as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:

 

     Three months ended March 31,  
     2011     2012  
     (Unaudited)  

Revenues

     100.0     100.0

Cost of revenue

     15.2        14.7   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross Margin

     84.8        85.3   

Operating expenses:

    

Sales and marketing

     24.8        24.7   

Technology and product development

     17.7        16.5   

General and administrative

     23.8        22.8   

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

     3.1        2.3   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     69.3        66.4   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

     15.4        19.0   

Interest and other (expense) income, net

     (1.5     (3.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before tax

     13.9        16.0   

Income tax expense

     5.0        5.2   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

     8.9        10.7   

Convertible preferred stock accretion of discount

     (0.4     (0.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income applicable to common stockholders

     8.5     10.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

15


Table of Contents

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2012

Revenues

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011      2012      Increase      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Revenues

   $ 20,713       $ 22,927       $   2,214         10.7

Premium members at March 31

     70,692         75,829         5,137         7.3

The increase in revenues was due largely to higher subscriber bases for Premium Membership, Property Comps and Property Facts products.

We currently anticipate that revenues will grow modestly in future periods as we continue to expand the array of products and services we deliver to our customers.

Cost of Revenues

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011     2012     Increase      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Cost of revenues

   $   3,157      $   3,368      $      211           6.7

Percentage of revenues

     15.2     14.7     

Cost of revenues consists of the expenses associated with the operation of our website, including depreciation of network infrastructure equipment, salaries and benefits of network operations personnel, Internet connectivity and hosting costs. Cost of revenues also includes salaries and benefits expenses associated with our data quality, data import and customer support personnel and credit card and other transaction fees relating to processing customer transactions.

The increase in cost of revenues was due primarily to an increase in salaries and benefit costs related to data quality, data import and customer support personnel, which was required in order to support our increased property listing and user activity.

We expect cost of revenues to increase in absolute dollar amounts and potentially as a percentage of revenues, as we continue to invest in current and new products and services.

Sales and Marketing

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011     2012     Increase      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Sales and marketing

   $   5,134      $   5,665      $   531         10.3

Percentage of revenues

     24.8     24.7     

Sales and marketing expenses consist of the compensation and associated costs for sales and marketing personnel, advertising expenses as well as public relations and other promotional activities.

The increase in sales and marketing expenses was due in part to an increase in the number of sales personnel and increased commissions.

We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in both absolute dollar amounts and potentially as a percentage of revenues, as we continue to expand our marketing and sales programs to attract and retain customers and market new products and services.

 

16


Table of Contents

Technology and Product Development

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011     2012     Increase      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Technology and product development

   $   3,659      $   3,779      $      120         3.3

Percentage of revenues

     17.7     16.5     

Technology and product development costs include expenses for the research and development of new products and services, as well as improvements to and maintenance of existing products and services.

The increase in technology and product development expenses was due primarily to increases in salaries and related costs associated with the launch of new product enhancements and services and the maintenance of our existing services.

We expect technology and product development expenses to increase in absolute dollar amounts and potentially as a percentage of revenues, as we continue to invest in current and new products and services.

General and Administrative

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011     2012     Increase      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

General and administrative

   $   4,924      $   5,232      $   308         6.3

Percentage of revenues

     23.8     22.8     

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, accounting, billing and human resources personnel. These costs also include insurance and professional fees, rent and related expenses. Professional fees primarily consist of outside legal and audit fees.

The increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to higher costs associated with the pending Merger.

We expect general and administrative expenses to potentially increase in absolute dollar amounts and as a percentage of revenues as we continue to incur costs associated with the pending Merger.

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011     2012     Decrease      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

   $      641      $      538      $      103         16.1

Percentage of revenues

     3.1     2.3     

Amortization of acquired intangible assets is a result of purchased assets or businesses. These purchased transactions result in the creation of acquired intangible assets with finite lives and lead to a corresponding increase in our amortization expense in future periods. We amortize intangible assets over the period of estimated benefit, using a straight-line method and estimated useful lives up to 8 years.

The decrease in amortization of acquired intangible assets was due primarily to certain acquired intangible assets being fully amortized.

We expect amortization of acquired intangible assets to potentially decrease in absolute dollar amounts and as a percentage of revenues, as acquired intangible assets from previously acquired businesses become fully amortized.

 

17


Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2011      2012      Decrease      Percent
Change
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Cost of revenue

   $ 130       $ 128       $ 2         1.5

Sales and marketing

     585         385              200         34.2

Technology and product development

     801         392         409         51.1

General and administrative

     994         780         214         21.5
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $   2,510       $   1,685       $ 825         32.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expenses associated with stock-based compensation decreased by $825,000 to $1,685,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $2,510,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The decrease was due primarily to stock option grants being fully vested.

Interest and other (expense) income, net

Interest and other (expense) income increased by $370,000 to $687,000 of expense in the three months ended March 31, 2012, from $317,000 of expense in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase was due primarily to higher losses realized from our equity investments.

Income Tax Expense

We recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2012, based upon a 32.7% effective tax rate for the full year of 2012. The effective tax rate is based upon our estimated fiscal 2012 income before the provision for income taxes. To the extent the estimate of fiscal 2012 income before the provision for income taxes changes, our provision for income taxes will change as well.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes our cash flows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     2011     2012  
     (Unaudited)  

Cash flow data:

    

Cash provided by operating activities

   $ 5,796      $  6,182   

Cash used in investing activities

     (1,400     (1,012

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     636        2,219   

As of March 31, 2012, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $118.5 million, compared to $97.3 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as of March 31, 2011.

Cash equivalents and short-term investments consist of money market funds, and marketable securities that we classify as available for sale. Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, as well as the cash flow that we generate from our operations. We do not currently have any commercial debt or posted letters of credit.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, and the effect of changes in working capital. Net cash provided by operating activities was $6.2 million and $5.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

18


Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $1.0 million was attributable to the purchase of investments of $0.9 million and to capital expenditures for the purchase of computer equipment, office equipment and furniture of $0.1 million.

Cash used in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $1.4 million was attributable to capital expenditures of $0.9 million for the purchase of computer equipment, office equipment and furniture and the purchase of investments of $0.5 million.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $2.2 million was primarily attributable to the net proceeds from the exercise of stock-based awards and the tax benefit from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by tax withholdings related to net share settlements of restricted stock units.

Cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $0.6 million was primarily attributable to the net proceeds from the exercise of stock-based awards and the tax benefit from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by tax withholdings related to net share settlements of restricted stock units.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. We believe there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we invest in short-term, high-quality, interest-bearing securities. Our investments in debt securities are subject to interest rate risk. To minimize our exposure to an adverse shift in interest rates, we invest in short-term securities and maintain an average maturity of one year or less. If interest rates were to instantaneously increase or decrease by 100 basis points, the change in the fair market value of our short-term investment would not be a material amount to our financial statements. There have not been any material changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to our primary market risk exposures, or how these exposures are managed.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

19


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On January 3, 2012, LoopNet was sued by CIVIX-DDI, LLC (“Civix”) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,385,622 and 6,415,291. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, attorney fees and costs. On February 16, 2012, LoopNet filed an answer to Civix’s compliant and filed counterclaims against Civix seeking, among other things, declaratory relief that the asserted patents are invalid, not infringed, and that Civix committed inequitable conduct during the prosecution and re-examination of the asserted patents. On February 21, 2012, Civix filed a motion to dismiss and strike LoopNet’s counterclaims. LoopNet opposed the motion, and the motion was fully briefed and submitted to the court on March 8, 2012. The district court has not ruled on the motion. On March 22, 2012, the district court scheduled trial for November 2012. Discovery has just begun in the case and the parties have made initial disclosures as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At this time, LoopNet cannot predict the outcome of this case, but intends to vigorously defend itself.

On January 18, 2012, an entity called Earthcomber, LLC filed a lawsuit against LoopNet in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,589,628. The complaint sought unspecified damages, attorneys fees and costs. LoopNet was never served with a copy of the summons and complaint for this lawsuit. On March 12, 2012, Earthcomber, LLC voluntarily dismissed this lawsuit, without prejudice, and without any response having been filed by LoopNet.

Currently and from time to time, we are involved in disputes and litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. While we cannot assure you as to the ultimate outcome of any legal proceedings, we are not currently party to any legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

We have updated the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2012.

Due to the factors set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we filed with the SEC, as well as other variables affecting our operating results and financial condition, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

Risks Related to our Pending Merger with CoStar

Completion of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions.

Both we and CoStar filed notification and report forms with the Department of Justice and the FTC pursuant to the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), on May 31, 2011. As previously announced, on June 30, 2011, we and CoStar each received a request for additional information (commonly referred to as a “second request”) from the FTC with respect to the proposed Merger. As previously announced, on October 26, 2011, at the request of the FTC, we and CoStar agreed to extend the waiting period imposed by the HSR Act from 30 to 60 days after the date of substantial compliance with the second request, which was certified by us and CoStar on November 4, 2011. As previously disclosed on January 3, 2012, we and CoStar voluntarily agreed to extend the waiting period imposed by the HSR Act on a 45-day rolling basis to allow us to continue to engage in discussions with the FTC to determine whether there was a possible basis for, and to discuss the possible terms of, a mutually acceptable consent order that would allow the Merger to close. In addition, as previously announced on January 31, 2012, we and CoStar have agreed to extend the date after which either we or Costar may individually elect to terminate the Merger Agreement to April 30, 2012.

As disclosed on April 17, 2012, we and CoStar announced that we had reached agreement on a mutually acceptable consent order with the staff of the FTC. On April 26, 2012, the FTC accepted the consent order that was previously agreed. The consent order is subject to a 30-day public comment period and then final acceptance by the FTC. However, there are no further regulatory approvals required to complete the merger of the Company and CoStar, as the waiting period under the HSR Act was terminated upon the FTC’s acceptance of the consent order.

Notwithstanding the termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act, each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger remains subject to the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party (subject to certain qualifications and exceptions) and the performance in all material respects of the other party’s covenants under the Merger Agreement, including, with respect to us, customary covenants regarding operation of our business prior to closing. As a result of these conditions, we cannot assure you that the Merger will be completed, or that, if completed, it will be exactly on the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed for any reason, we expect that we would continue to be managed by our current management, under the direction of our board of directors.

 

20


Table of Contents

The pendency of our agreement to be acquired by CoStar and the failure to complete the Merger with CoStar could adversely affect our business.

Our proposed Merger with CoStar was announced on April 27, 2011 and remains pending at this time. The possibility that the Merger may not be completed could cause disruptions in our business. If the proposed Merger is not completed, our stock price will likely fall as the current market price of our common stock reflects an assumption that a transaction will be completed. In addition, under circumstances described in the Merger Agreement, we may be required to pay a termination fee of up to $25.8 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated. Further, the failure of the proposed Merger to be completed may result in negative publicity and/or a negative impression of us in the investment community and may affect our relationship with our employees, customers and other partners in the business community.

The Merger process could adversely affect our business, stock price, reputation and results of operations.

Our efforts to complete the Merger could cause substantial disruptions in our business, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results. Among other things, uncertainty as to whether a transaction will be completed with CoStar may affect our ability to recruit prospective employees or to retain and motivate existing employees. Employee retention may be particularly challenging while the Merger is pending, because employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with CoStar.

Uncertainty as to our future could adversely affect our business, reputation and our relationship with customers and potential customers. For example, customers and others that deal with us could defer decisions concerning working with us, or seek to change existing business relationships with us. Further, a substantial amount of the attention of management and employees is being directed toward the completion of the Merger and thus is being diverted from our day-to-day operations because matters related to the Merger (including integration planning) require substantial commitments of time and resources.

While the Merger Agreement is in effect, we are subject to restrictions on our business activities.

While the Merger Agreement is in effect, we are subject to restrictions on our business activities and must generally operate our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice (subject to certain exceptions). These restrictions could prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that arise prior to the completion of the Merger and are generally outside the ordinary course of business, and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations or financial condition.

In certain instances, the Merger Agreement requires us to pay a termination fee of $25.8 million to CoStar, a payment which could affect the decisions of a third party considering making an alternative acquisition proposal.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we may be required to pay to CoStar a termination fee of $25.8 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances. This payment could affect the structure, pricing and terms proposed by a third party seeking to acquire or merge with us and could deter such third party from making a competing acquisition proposal.

Risks Related to Our Business

The ongoing uncertainty in the commercial real estate market and overall economy could negatively affect our revenues, expenses and operating results.

Our business is sensitive to trends in the general economy and trends in commercial real estate markets, which are unpredictable and continue to be volatile and subject to uncertainty. Although we are currently seeing signs of stabilization after a prolonged downturn, the depressed debt markets continue to affect the investment sales market and have been contributing to a slow down in our industry, which we anticipate will continue through 2012. These negative general economic conditions could further reduce the overall amount of sale and leasing activity in the commercial real estate industry, and hence the demand for our services. Conditions such as continued tightening in credit markets, reduced industry-wide transaction volumes and negative trends in consumer confidence in global and domestic markets could also further dampen the general economy, and our business. While we believe the increase in the number of distressed sales and resulting decrease in asset prices will eventually translate to greater market activity, the current overall reduction in sales transaction volume continues to negatively impact our business. Therefore, our operating results, to the extent they reflect changes in the broader commercial real estate industry, may be subject to significant fluctuations. Factors that are affecting and could further affect the commercial real estate industry include:

 

   

periods of economic slowdown or recession globally, in the United States or locally;

 

   

inflation;

 

   

flows of capital into or out of real estate investment in the United States or various regions of the United States;

 

   

rates of unemployment;

 

   

interest rates;

 

21


Table of Contents
   

the availability and cost of capital;

 

   

wage and salary levels; or

 

   

concerns about any of the foregoing.

We believe that the commercial real estate industry is composed of many submarkets, each of which is influenced differently, and often in opposite ways, by various economic factors. We believe that commercial real estate submarkets can be differentiated based on factors such as geographic location, value of properties, whether properties are sold or leased, and other factors. Each such submarket may be affected differently by, among other things:

 

   

economic slowdown or recession;

 

   

changes in levels of rent or appreciation of asset values;

 

   

changing interest rates;

 

   

tax and accounting policies;

 

   

the availability and cost of capital;

 

   

costs of construction;

 

   

increased unemployment;

 

   

lower consumer confidence;

 

   

lower wage and salary levels;

 

   

war, terrorist attacks or natural disasters; or

 

   

the public perception that any of these conditions may occur.

For example, as of March 31, 2012, approximately 24% of our premium members were based in California and approximately 11% were based in Florida. Negative conditions in these or other significant commercial real estate submarkets could disproportionately affect our business as compared to competitors who have less or different geographic concentrations of their customers. Events such as a war or a significant terrorist attack are also likely to affect the general economy, and could cause a slowdown in the commercial real estate industry and therefore reduce utilization of our marketplace, which could reduce our revenue from premium members. The occurrence of any of the events listed above could increase our need to make significant expenditures to continue to attract customers to our marketplace.

Our business is largely based on a subscription model, and accordingly, any failure to increase the number of our customers or retain existing customers could cause our revenues to decline.

Our customers include premium members of our LoopNet marketplace, LoopLink users, users of our BizBuySell, BizQuest, Cityfeet, LandsofAmerica and LandAndFarm marketplaces, Property Comps and Property Facts subscribers, REApplications users and advertising and lead generation customers. The majority of our current revenues are generated by subscription fees paid by our premium members. Our growth depends in large part on increasing the number of our free basic members and then converting them into paying premium members, as well as retaining existing premium members. Either category of members may decide not to continue to use our services in favor of alternate services or because of budgetary constraints or other reasons. Since the fourth quarter of 2007, our average monthly cancellation rate for premium members has exceeded our historical rate of three to five percent, although the cancellation rate in the past couple of years has been within our expected range of 4.5% to 6.5%. We believe the higher cancellation rate is primarily the result of a significant slow-down in transaction activity in the commercial real estate industry that began in the fourth quarter of 2007, due to deteriorating economic conditions and due to the “credit crunch” impacting the availability and cost of debt capital for real estate transactions.

If our existing members choose not to use our services, decrease their use of our services, or change from being premium members to basic members, or we are unable to attract new members, listings on our site could be reduced, search activity on our website could decline, the usefulness of our services could be diminished, and we could incur significant expenses and/or experience declining revenues.

 

22


Table of Contents

The value of our marketplaces to our customers is dependent on increasing the number of property listings provided by and searches conducted by our members. To grow our marketplaces, we must convince prospective members to use our services. Prospective members may not be familiar with our services and may be accustomed to using traditional methods of listing, searching, marketing and advertising commercial real estate. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in continuing to acquire more members, in continuing to convert free basic members into paying premium members or that our future sales efforts in general will be effective. Further, it is difficult to estimate the total number of active commercial real estate agents, property owners, landlords, buyers and tenants in the United States during any given period. As a result, we do not know the extent to which we have penetrated this market. If we reach the point at which we have attempted to sell our services to a significant majority of commercial real estate transaction participants in the United States, we will need to seek additional products and markets in order to maintain our rate of growth of revenues and profitability.

We rely on our marketing efforts to generate new registered members. If our marketing efforts are ineffective, we could fail to attract new registered members, which could reduce the attractiveness of our marketplace to current and potential customers and lead to a reduction in our revenues.

We believe that the attractiveness of our services and products to our current and potential customers increases as we attract additional members who provide additional property listings or conduct searches on our marketplace. This is because an increase in the number of our members and the number of listings on our website increases the utility of our website and of its associated search, listing and marketing services. In order to attract new registered members, we rely on our marketing efforts, such as word-of-mouth referrals, direct marketing, online and traditional advertising, sponsoring and attending local industry association events, and attending and exhibiting at industry trade shows and conferences. There is no guarantee that our marketing efforts will be effective. Furthermore, our ability to develop and successfully market our new information products and services may also be important in attracting new registered members. If we are unable to effectively market our existing and new products and services to new customers, or convert existing basic members into premium members, and we are not able to offset any decline in our rate of conversion of basic members to premium members with higher average subscription prices, our revenues and operating results could decline as a result of current premium members failing to renew their premium memberships and potential premium members failing to become premium members.

If we are unable to obtain or retain listings from commercial real estate brokers, agents, and property owners, our marketplace could be less attractive to current or potential customers, which could result in a reduction in our revenues.

Our success depends substantially on the number of commercial real estate property listings submitted by brokers, agents and property owners to our online marketplace. The number of listings on our marketplace has increased to 826,765 as of March 31, 2012, from 820,391 as of December 31, 2011, and 788,330 as of December 31, 2010. If agents marketing large numbers of property listings, such as large brokers in key real estate markets, choose not to continue their listings with us, or choose to list them with a competitor, our website would be less attractive to other real estate industry transaction participants, thus resulting in cancelled premium memberships, failure to attract and retain new members, or failure to attract advertising and lead generation revenues.

We may be unable to compete successfully with our current or future competitors.

The market to provide property listing, searching, information services and analytical products, and marketing and transaction services to the commercial real estate industry is highly competitive and fragmented, with limited barriers to entry in certain segments. In the land-for-sale and businesses-for-sale sectors, we similarly compete with a broad array of online marketplaces, as well as local and regional multiple listing services. We face competition from a variety of sources with respect to our different product offerings. We may not be able to compete successfully against our competitors that focus on one type of product or service area with respect to that particular product or service. Additionally, our current or new competitors may adopt aspects of our business model, which could reduce our ability to differentiate our services. Furthermore, listings in the commercial real estate industry are not marketed exclusively through any single channel, and accordingly our competition could aggregate a set of listings similar to ours. If our current or potential customers choose to use these services rather than ours, demand for our services could decline. Increased competition could result in a reduction in our revenues or our rate of acquisition of new customers, or loss of existing customers or market share, any of which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our focus on internal and external investments may result in flat revenue growth rates and place downward pressure on our operating margins.

In 2010, 2011 and the first quarter of 2012, we increased the rate of investments in our business, including internal investments in product development, data aggregation and information services, sales and marketing, to expand the breadth and depth of services we provide to our customers. In 2010, we also made external investments such as acquisitions and investments in other companies, but were limited by the Merger Agreement from doing so in 2011. For example, as part of our investment in information services, we launched the Property Facts product in 2010 and invested in further improvements in 2011. We also acquired LandsofAmerica in 2010 to further our reach in the land-for-sale category. This investment strategy is intended to accelerate our revenue growth and market share gains in the future as activity in the commercial real estate industry shows signs of stabilizing and begins to recover. While we believe this strategy will enable us to capitalize on opportunities we see in our industry and extend our leadership position, we expect our operating margins to experience a downward pressure and our revenue growth rate to be flat in the short term as a result of our planned investments and economic environment. Furthermore, if the industry fails to stabilize or deteriorates further in 2012 and beyond, such investments may not have their intended effect. For instance, our external investments may lose value and as a result, we may incur impairment charges with respect to such investments, as we did in the fourth quarter of 2011. If we are unable to successfully execute our investment strategy or fail to adequately anticipate potential problems, we may experience further decreases in our revenues and operating margins.

 

23


Table of Contents

If we are unable to introduce new or upgraded services, products or enabling technologies that our customers recognize as valuable, we may fail to attract new customers or retain existing customers. Our efforts to develop new and upgraded products and services could require us to incur significant costs.

To continue to attract new members to our online marketplace, we may need to continue to introduce new products or services or develop additional enabling technologies. We may choose to develop new products and services independently or choose to license or otherwise integrate content and data from third parties. Developing and delivering these new or upgraded services or products may impose costs and require the attention of our product and technology department and management. This process is costly, and we may experience difficulties in developing and delivering these new or upgraded services or products. In addition, successfully launching and selling a new service or product will require the use of our sales and marketing resources. Efforts to enhance and improve the ease of use, responsiveness, functionality and features of our existing products and services have inherent risks, and we may not be able to manage these product developments and enhancements successfully. If we are unable to continue to develop new or upgraded services or products or develop additional enabling technologies, then our customers may choose not to use our products or services.

If we are not able to successfully identify or integrate acquisitions, our management’s attention could be diverted, and efforts to integrate acquisitions could consume significant resources.

We have made acquisitions of, and investments in, other companies in the past, but were limited to some extent by the restrictions in the Merger Agreement from doing so in 2011, which restrictions remain in place. In the event the Merger is not completed, we may in the future further expand our markets and services in part through additional acquisitions of, or investments in, other complementary businesses, services, databases and technologies. For example, since October 2004, we made several acquisitions, including BizBuySell, Cityfeet.com Inc., REApplications, Inc., LandAndFarm.com, BizQuest, ReactionWeb and LandsofAmerica. Mergers and acquisitions are inherently risky, and we cannot assure you that our acquisitions will be successful. The successful execution of any acquisition strategy will depend on our ability to identify, negotiate, complete and integrate such acquisitions and, if necessary, obtain satisfactory debt or equity financing to fund those acquisitions. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquired businesses could harm our business. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:

 

   

difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies, and products of the acquired companies;

 

   

diversion of management’s attention from the normal daily operations of our business;

 

   

inability to maintain the key business relationships and the reputations of acquired businesses;

 

   

entry into markets in which we have limited or no prior experience and in which competitors have stronger market positions;

 

   

dependence on unfamiliar affiliates and partners;

 

   

insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions;

 

   

reduction or replacement of the sales of existing services by sales of products or services from acquired lines of business;

 

   

responsibility for the liabilities of acquired businesses;

 

   

inability to maintain our internal standards, controls, procedures and policies; and

 

   

potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies.

We may also incur costs, and divert our management’s attention from our business, by pursuing potential acquisitions or other investments which are never consummated.

Although we undertake a due diligence investigation of each business that we acquire, there may be liabilities of the acquired companies that we fail to or are unable to discover during the due diligence investigation and for which we, as a successor owner, may be responsible. In connection with acquisitions, we generally seek to minimize the impact of these types of potential liabilities through indemnities and warranties from the seller, which may in some instances be supported by deferring payment of a portion of the purchase price. However, these indemnities and warranties, if obtained, may not fully cover the liabilities due to limitations in scope, amount or duration, financial limitations of the indemnitor or warrantor or other reasons.

 

24


Table of Contents

The number of our registered members is higher than the number of actual members.

The number of registered members in our network is higher than the number of actual members because some members have multiple registrations or others may have registered under fictitious names. Given the challenges inherent in identifying these accounts, we do not have a reliable system to accurately identify the number of actual members, and thus we rely on the number of registered members as one of our key operating metrics and our measure of the size of our marketplace. Furthermore, although the number of our registered members, which includes both basic and premium members, has increased over the last several years, the number of premium members has decreased over the same period. If the number of our actual members does not continue to grow and those members do not convert to premium members, then our business may not grow as fast as we expect, which will harm our operating and financial results.

Our operating results and revenues are subject to fluctuations that may cause our stock price to decline, and our quarterly financial results may be subject to seasonality, each of which could cause our stock price to decline.

Our revenues, expenses and operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to continue to do so in the future. Our revenues, expenses and operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to factors including those described below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

 

   

rates of member adoption and retention;

 

   

changes in our pricing strategy and timing of changes;

 

   

changes in our marketing or other corporate strategies;

 

   

our introduction of and investments in new products and services or changes to existing products and services;

 

   

the amount and timing of our operating expenses and capital expenditures;

 

   

the amount and timing of non-cash stock-based charges;

 

   

costs related to acquisitions of businesses or technologies or impairment charges associated with such investments and acquisitions; and

 

   

other factors outside of our control.

Our results of operations could vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to the seasonal nature of the commercial real estate industry. The timing of widely observed holidays and vacation periods, particularly slow downs during the end-of-year holiday period, and availability of real estate agents and related service providers during these periods, could significantly affect our quarterly operating results during that period. For example, we have historically experienced a significant decline in the rate of growth of both new memberships and revenues during the fourth quarter.

These fluctuations or seasonality effects could negatively affect our results of operations during the period in question and/or future periods or cause our stock price to decline.

If we are unable to enforce or defend our ownership and use of intellectual property, our business, competitive position and operating results could be harmed.

The success of our business depends in large part on our intellectual property, and our intellectual property rights, including existing and future trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights, are and will continue to be valuable and important assets of our business. Our business could be significantly harmed if we are not able to protect the content of our databases and our other intellectual property.

We have taken measures to protect our intellectual property, such as requiring our employees and consultants with access to our proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements. We also have taken action, and in the future may take additional action, against competitors or other parties who we believe to be infringing our intellectual property. We may in the future find it necessary to assert claims regarding our intellectual property. These measures may not be sufficient or effective to protect our intellectual property. These measures could also be expensive and could significantly divert our management’s attention from other business concerns.

We also rely on laws, including those regarding patents, copyrights, and trade secrets, to protect our intellectual property rights. Current laws may not adequately protect our intellectual property or our databases and the data contained in them. In addition, legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related businesses are uncertain and evolving, and we cannot assure you of the future viability or value of any of our proprietary rights.

Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could require us to develop alternative intellectual property, incur licensing or other expenses, or limit our product and service offerings.

 

25


Table of Contents

Our services may infringe the intellectual property rights of others and we may be subject to claims of intellectual property rights infringement.

We may be subject to claims against us alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, including our competitors. Any intellectual property claims, regardless of merit, could be expensive to litigate or settle and could significantly divert our management’s attention from other business concerns.

Our technologies and content may not be able to withstand third-party claims of infringement. If we were unable to successfully defend against such claims, we might have to pay damages, stop using the technology or content found to be in violation of a third party’s rights, seek a license for the infringing technology or content, or develop alternative non-infringing technology or content. Licenses for the infringing technology or content may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, developing alternative non-infringing technology or content could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology or content for any infringing aspects of our business, we may be forced to limit our service offerings. Any of these results could reduce our ability to compete effectively and harm our business. See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information with respect to certain currently pending legal matters.

Our trademarks are important to our business. Other companies may own, obtain or claim trademarks that could prevent, limit or interfere with our use of trademarks. If we were unable to use our trademarks, we would need to devote substantial resources toward developing different brand identities.

We could face liability for information on our website or general litigation claims.

We provide information on our website, including commercial real estate listings and broker listings that are submitted by our customers and third parties. We also allow third parties to advertise their products and services on our website and include links to third-party websites. We could be exposed to liability with respect to this information. Customers could assert that information concerning them on our website is misleading and contains errors or omissions. Third parties could seek damages for losses incurred if they rely upon incorrect information provided by our customers or advertisers. We could also be subject to claims that the persons posting information on our website do not have the right to post such information or are infringing the rights of third parties or do not have the qualifications or licenses they disclose. Among other things, we might be subject to claims that by directly or indirectly providing links to websites operated by third parties, we would be liable for wrongful actions by the third parties operating those websites. Even if these claims do not result in liability to us, we could incur significant costs in investigating and defending against these claims.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, allows copyright owners to obtain subpoenas compelling disclosure by an Internet service provider of the names of customers of that Internet service provider. We have been served with such subpoenas in the past, and may in the future be served with additional such subpoenas. Compliance with subpoenas under the DMCA may divert our resources, including the attention of our management, which could impede our ability to operate our business.

Our potential liability for information on our websites or distributed by us to others could require us to implement additional measures to reduce our exposure to such liability, which may require us to expend substantial resources and limit the attractiveness of our online marketplace to users. Our general liability insurance may not cover all potential claims to which we are exposed and may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed.

If we are unable to convince commercial real estate brokers and other commercial real estate professionals that our services and products are superior to traditional methods of listing, searching, and marketing commercial real estate, they could choose not to use our marketplace, which could reduce our revenues or increase our expenses.

Our primary source of new customers is participants in the commercial real estate community. Many commercial real estate professionals are use to listing, searching and marketing real estate in traditional and off-line ways, such as through the distribution of print brochures, sharing of written lists, placing signs on properties, word-of-mouth, and newspaper advertisements. Commercial real estate and investment professionals may prefer to continue to use traditional methods or may be slow to adopt and accept our online products and services. If we are not able to continue to persuade commercial real estate participants of the efficacy of our online products and services, they may choose not to use our online marketplace, which could negatively impact our business.

Our business depends on retaining and attracting capable management and operating personnel.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to retain and attract high-quality management and operating personnel, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Richard J. Boyle, Jr., our President and Chief Operating Officer, Thomas Byrne, our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Brent Stumme, and our other Senior Vice Presidents. Our current long term business strategy was developed in large part by our senior-level officers that depends in part on their skills and knowledge to implement, and also includes a focus on new growth and investment initiatives that may require additional management expertise to successfully execute our strategy. We may not be able to offset the impact on our business of the loss of the services of Mr. Boyle or other key officers or employees or recruit additional talent. We have no employment agreements that prevent any of our key personnel from terminating their employment at any time, and we do not maintain any “key-person” life insurance for any of our personnel.

Furthermore, our business requires skilled technical, management, product and technology, and sales and marketing personnel, who are in high demand and are often subject to competing offers. Competition for qualified employees is intense in our industry, and the loss of a

 

26


Table of Contents

substantial number of qualified employees, or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the expansion of our activities, could harm our business. To retain and attract key personnel, we use various measures, including an equity incentive program and incentive bonuses for key executive officers and other employees. We have also entered into change of control severance agreements with our key executive officers, which provide, in part, certain severance benefits and acceleration of unvested equity awards if their employment is terminated in connection with a change of control of the Company. These measures may not be enough to attract and retain the personnel we require to execute our business plan.

Additionally, if the Merger is consummated and the Company becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of CoStar, we cannot assure you that the surviving subsidiary will retain members of our current management and operating personnel in their respective capacities.

Certain U.S. and foreign laws could subject us to claims or otherwise harm our business.

We are subject to a variety of laws in the U.S. and abroad that may subject us to claims or other remedies. Our failure to comply with applicable laws may subject us to additional liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Laws and regulations which are particularly relevant to our business address information security, content and the distribution of content, taxation, intellectual property rights, characteristics and quality of products and services, and online advertising and marketing, including email marketing and unsolicited commercial email.

Many applicable laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet. The laws that do reference the Internet are being interpreted by the courts, but their applicability and scope remain uncertain. For example, the laws relating to the liability of providers of online services are evolving. Claims have been either threatened or filed against us under both U.S. and foreign laws for defamation, libel, slander, invasion of privacy and other tort claims, unlawful activity, copyright and trademark infringement, or other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched and the advertisements posted by our websites’ users, our products and services, or content generated by our users.

Federal and state legislation regulating email communications and Internet advertising, such as privacy-related laws that restrict or prohibit unsolicited email (commonly known as “spam”) may adversely affect our ability to market our services to consumers in a cost-effective manner. Violation of such laws may result in monetary fines or penalties or damage to our reputation. The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM, imposes complex and often burdensome requirements in connection with sending commercial email. Depending on how the law is interpreted and applied, CAN-SPAM may impose significant costs and burdens on our email marketing practices.

Federal, state and local tax authorities may alter tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce. New, revised or existing tax regulations, whether domestic or internationally, may subject us or our affiliates to additional state sales, income and other taxes. We cannot predict the effect of current attempts to impose sales, income or other taxes on commerce over the Internet. New or revised taxes, particularly sales taxes, could negatively affect the attractiveness of advertising and selling products and services over the Internet and increase our costs. These events, if they occur, could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

If we fail to protect confidential information against security breaches, or if our members or potential members are reluctant to use our marketplace because of privacy concerns, we might face additional costs, and activity in our marketplace could decline.

As part of our membership registration process, we collect, use and disclose personally identifiable information, including names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and email addresses. Our policies concerning the collection, use and disclosure of personally identifiable information are described on our websites. While we believe that our policies are appropriate and that we are in compliance with our policies, we could be subject to legal claims, government action or harm to our reputation if actual practices fail to comply or are seen as failing to comply with our policies or with local, state or federal laws concerning personally identifiable information or if our policies are inadequate to protect the personally identifiable information that we collect.

Concern among prospective customers regarding our use of the personal information collected on our websites could keep prospective customers from using our marketplace. Industry-wide incidents or incidents with respect to our websites, including misappropriation of third-party information, security breaches, or changes in industry standards, regulations or laws could deter people from using the Internet or our website to conduct transactions that involve the transmission of confidential information, which could harm our business. Under California law and the laws of a number of other states, if there is a breach of our computer systems and we know or suspect that unencrypted personal customer data has been stolen, we are required to inform any customers whose data was stolen, which could harm our reputation and business.

In addition, another California law requires businesses that maintain personal information about California residents in electronic databases to implement reasonable measures to keep that information secure. Our practice is to encrypt all personal information, but we do not know whether our current practice will continue to be deemed sufficient under the California law. Other states have enacted different and sometimes contradictory requirements for protecting personal information collected and maintained electronically. Compliance with numerous and contradictory requirements of the different states is particularly difficult for an online business such as ours which collects personal information from customers in multiple jurisdictions.

 

27


Table of Contents

Another consequence of failure to comply is the possibility of adverse publicity and loss of consumer confidence were it known that we did not take adequate measures to assure the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information that our customers had given to us. This could result in a loss of customers and revenue that could jeopardize our success. While we intend to comply fully with all relevant laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in avoiding all potential liability or disruption of business in the event that we do not comply in every instance or in the event that the security of the customer data that we collect is compromised, regardless of whether our practices comply or not. If we were required to pay any significant amount of money in satisfaction of claims under these laws or if we were forced to cease our business operations for any length of time as a result of our inability to comply fully with any such laws, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. Further, complying with the applicable notice requirements in the event of a security breach could result in significant costs.

Unless we develop, maintain and protect our brand identity, our business may not grow and our financial results may suffer.

In an effort to obtain additional registered members and increase use of our online marketplace by commercial real estate transaction participants, we intend to continue to pursue a strategy of enhancing our brand both through online advertising and through traditional print media. These efforts can involve significant expense and may not have a material positive impact on our brand identity. In addition, maintaining our brand will depend on our ability to provide products and services that are perceived as being high-value, which we may not be able to implement successfully. If we are unable to maintain and enhance our brand, our ability to attract and retain customers or successfully expand our operations will be harmed.

If our operating results do not meet the expectations of investors or equity research analysts, our market price may decline and we may be subject to class action litigation.

It is possible that in the future our operating results will not meet the expectations of investors or equity research analysts, causing the market price of our common stock to decline. In the past, companies that have experienced decreases in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. A securities class action lawsuit against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns.

If our website or our other services experience system failures, our customers may be dissatisfied and our operations could be impaired.

Our business depends upon the satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our website. Problems with our website could result in reduced demand for our services. Furthermore, the software underlying our services is complex and may contain undetected errors. Despite testing, we cannot be certain that errors will not be found in our software. Any errors could result in adverse publicity, impaired use of our services, loss of revenues, cost increases or legal claims by customers.

Additionally, our services substantially depend on systems provided by third parties, over whom we have little control. Interruptions in our services could result from the failure of data providers, telecommunications providers, or other third parties. We depend on these third-party providers of Internet communication services to provide continuous and uninterrupted service. We also depend on Internet service providers that provide access to our services. Any disruption in the Internet access provided by third-party providers or any failure of third-party providers to handle higher volumes of user traffic could harm our business.

Our internal network infrastructure could be disrupted or penetrated, which could materially impact our ability to provide our services and our customers’ confidence in our services.

Our operations depend upon our ability to maintain and protect our computer systems, most of which are located in redundant and independent systems in Los Angeles, California and San Francisco, California. In addition, we utilize data centers in Virginia, Texas, and Colorado for specific services. While we believe that our systems are adequate to support our operations, our systems may be vulnerable to damage from break-ins, unauthorized access, vandalism, fire, floods, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures and similar events. Although we maintain insurance against fires, floods, and general business interruptions, the amount of coverage may not be adequate in any particular case. Furthermore, any damage or disruption could materially impair or prohibit our ability to provide our services, which could significantly impact our business.

Experienced computer programmers, or hackers, may attempt to penetrate our network security from time to time. Although we maintain a firewall, and will continue to enhance and review our databases to prevent unauthorized and unlawful intrusions, a hacker who penetrates our network security could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services. We might be required to expend significant

 

28


Table of Contents

capital and resources to protect against, or to alleviate, problems caused by hackers. We also may not have a timely remedy against a hacker who is able to penetrate our network security. In addition to purposeful security breaches, the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could expose us to litigation or to a material risk of loss. Any of these incidents could materially impact our ability to provide our services as well as materially impact the confidence of our customers in our services, either of which could significantly impact our business.

We may not be able to successfully halt the operations of websites that aggregate our data, as well as data from other companies, such as copycat websites that may misappropriate our data.

Third parties may misappropriate our data through website scraping, robots or other means and aggregate this data on their websites with data from other companies. In addition, “copycat” websites may misappropriate data on our website and attempt to imitate our brand or the functionality of our website. We may not be able to detect all such websites in a timely manner and, even if we could, technological and legal measures may be insufficient to stop their operations. In some cases, particularly in the case of websites operating outside of the United States, our available remedies may not be adequate to protect us against such websites. Regardless of whether we can successfully enforce our rights against these websites, any measures that we may take could require us to expend significant financial or other resources.

Our stock price may be volatile and you may be unable to sell your shares at or above the purchase price.

The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other things, the risk factors described in this section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, whether or not the Merger is completed and other factors beyond our control, such as fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us.

Furthermore, the stock markets have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

In the past, many companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

Our principal stockholders, executive officers and directors own a significant percentage of our stock, and as a result, the trading price for our shares may be depressed and these stockholders can take actions that may be adverse to your interests.

Our executive officers and directors and entities affiliated with them, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 31% of our outstanding shares of common stock and since the Merger Agreement was signed have been limited in their ability to sell shares of our common stock without the consent of CoStar pursuant to Voting and Support Agreements entered into in connection with the Merger. This significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because investors often perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with controlling stockholders. These stockholders, acting together, may have the ability to exert control over all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election and removal of directors and any proposed merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders who are executive officers or directors, or who have representatives on our Board of Directors, could dictate the management of our business and affairs. This concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, or impeding a merger or consolidation, takeover or other business combination that could be favorable to our other stockholders.

Our charter documents and Delaware law could prevent a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also reduce the market price of our stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of our company. These provisions could also make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions include:

 

   

providing for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms;

 

   

not providing for cumulative voting in the election of directors; or imposing a majority voting standard;

 

   

authorizing the board to issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock rights senior to those of common stock;

 

   

prohibiting stockholder action by written consent;

 

   

limiting the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders; and

 

   

requiring advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals.

In addition, the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Laws govern us. While we have waived the application of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Laws with respect to the investors who acquired shares of our Series A convertible preferred

 

29


Table of Contents

stock in the April 2009 private placement, these provisions may otherwise prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us for a certain period of time. These and other provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and under Delaware law could discourage potential takeover attempts, reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock in the future and result in the market price being lower than it would be without these provisions.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibits:

 

  31.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (CEO)
  31.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (CFO)
  32.1    Section 1350 Certification (CEO)
  32.2    Section 1350 Certification (CFO)
101.INS*    XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed herewith, is not a part of a registration statement or Prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

30


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  LOOPNET, INC.
Date: April 27, 2012   By:  

/s/ Richard J. Boyle, Jr.

    Richard J. Boyle, Jr.
    Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors Principal Executive Officer
Date: April 27, 2012   By:  

/s/ Brent Stumme

    Brent Stumme
    Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration Principal Financial or Accounting Officer

 

31


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibits:

 

  31.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (CEO)
  31.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (CFO)
  32.1    Section 1350 Certification (CEO)
  32.2    Section 1350 Certification (CFO)
101.INS*    XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed herewith, is not a part of a registration statement or Prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

32