UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008
Commission File No. 1-33762
UCN, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 87-0528557 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
7730 So Union Park Avenue, Suite 500, Midvale, UT 84047
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)
(801) 320-3200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
¨ Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class |
Outstanding as of August 8, 2008 | |
Common Stock, $.0001 par value | 31,065,228 shares |
Page | ||
ITEM NUMBER AND CAPTION |
||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (unaudited) |
3 | |
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
7 | |
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12 | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
16 | |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
17 | |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
19 | |
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
19 | |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
19 | |
Item 5. Other Information |
19 | |
Item 6. Exhibits |
20 | |
21 |
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(Unaudited)
(in thousands except share data)
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,723 | $ | 2,760 | ||||
Auction rate preferred securities (Note 10) |
| 2,000 | ||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1,636 and $1,779, respectively |
8,221 | 9,988 | ||||||
Other current assets |
767 | 941 | ||||||
Total current assets |
12,711 | 15,689 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
7,106 | 6,375 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
5,179 | 6,813 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,512 | 2,155 | ||||||
Auction rate preferred securities (Note 10) |
890 | | ||||||
Other assets |
429 | 336 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 28,827 | $ | 31,368 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
$ | 716 | $ | 781 | ||||
Trade accounts payable |
6,899 | 7,713 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
2,753 | 2,120 | ||||||
Accrued commissions |
1,301 | 1,470 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
934 | 338 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
12,603 | 12,422 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
3,119 | 746 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities and deferred revenue |
277 | 172 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
15,999 | 13,340 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4 and 6) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 31,065,228 and 31,015,593 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
3 | 3 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
69,528 | 68,738 | ||||||
Warrants and options outstanding |
1,318 | 1,318 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(57,911 | ) | (52,031 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(110 | ) | | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
12,828 | 18,028 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 28,827 | $ | 31,368 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
UCN, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - (Unaudited)
(in thousands except share and per share data)
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 19,285 | $ | 19,975 | $ | 39,166 | $ | 39,795 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Costs of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
10,362 | 11,128 | 20,870 | 22,665 | ||||||||||||
Selling and promotion |
4,286 | 4,102 | 8,480 | 7,952 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,164 | 4,164 | 10,625 | 7,862 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,440 | 1,495 | 2,892 | 3,288 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
1,078 | 447 | 2,036 | 875 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
22,330 | 21,336 | 44,903 | 42,642 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(3,045 | ) | (1,361 | ) | (5,737 | ) | (2,847 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
11 | 3 | 31 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(113 | ) | (202 | ) | (168 | ) | (402 | ) | ||||||||
Total other expense |
(102 | ) | (199 | ) | (137 | ) | (384 | ) | ||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(3,147 | ) | (1,560 | ) | (5,874 | ) | (3,231 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
3 | 2 | 6 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (3,150 | ) | $ | (1,562 | ) | $ | (5,880 | ) | $ | (3,236 | ) | ||||
Net loss per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
31,039 | 28,166 | 31,033 | 27,243 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY - (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital |
Warrants and Options Outstanding |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
31,016 | $ | 3 | $ | 68,738 | $ | 1,318 | $ | (52,031 | ) | $ | | $ | 18,028 | |||||||||
Common stock issued for options exercised (Note 8) |
49 | | 105 | | | | 105 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 685 | | | | 685 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | (5,880 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities (Note 10) |
| | | | | (110 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(5,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
31,065 | $ | 3 | $ | 69,528 | $ | 1,318 | $ | (57,911 | ) | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 12,828 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,880 | ) | $ | (3,236 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,892 | 3,288 | ||||||
Amortization of note financing costs |
15 | 379 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
685 | 599 | ||||||
Warrants issued for consulting services |
| 143 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of effects of acquisitions): |
||||||||
Accounts and other receivables, net |
1,767 | 142 | ||||||
Other current assets |
210 | 179 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
(103 | ) | (259 | ) | ||||
Trade accounts payable |
(740 | ) | (1,471 | ) | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
633 | 141 | ||||||
Accrued commissions |
(169 | ) | (171 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities |
701 | (246 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
11 | (512 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Decrease in restricted cash |
| 10 | ||||||
Acquisition of BenchmarkPortal, Inc. |
| (500 | ) | |||||
Contingent purchase price payments |
(357 | ) | (172 | ) | ||||
Direct acquisition costs |
| (245 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of auction rate preferred securities |
1,000 | | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,317 | ) | (1,299 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(674 | ) | (2,206 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit |
2,000 | 500 | ||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(479 | ) | (265 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on long-term debt assumed in conjunction with the acquisition of ScheduleQ, LLC |
| (256 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants |
105 | 574 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
1,626 | 553 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
963 | (2,165 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
2,760 | 4,559 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 3,723 | $ | 2,394 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 54 | $ | 307 | ||||
Cash paid for taxes |
$ | 9 | $ | 8 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Unrealized loss on change in fair value of auction rate securities |
$ | 110 | $ | | ||||
Property and equipment financed with short-term payables |
$ | 74 | $ | 52 | ||||
Contingent purchase price payments included in accounts payable |
| $ | 56 | |||||
Property and equipment and other assets financed through capital leases |
$ | 787 | | |||||
Issuance of common stock related to the acquisition of Benchmark Portal, Inc. |
| $ | 4,500 | |||||
Issuance of long-term debt related to the acquisition of Benchmark Portal, Inc. |
| $ | 101 | |||||
Warrants issued to lender for approval of BenchmarkPortal, Inc. acquisition |
| $ | 83 | |||||
Issuance of common stock related to the acquisition of ScheduleQ, LLC |
| $ | 330 | |||||
Issuance of long-term debt related to the acquisition of ScheduleQ, LLC |
| $ | 302 | |||||
Assumption of long-term debt related to the acquisition of ScheduleQ, LLC |
| $ | 256 | |||||
Conversion of convertible term note at $3.00 per share for 1,126,664 shares of common stock |
| $ | 3,380 | |||||
Cashless warrant exercise |
| $ | 189 | |||||
Lender fee charged for approval of BenchmarkPortal Inc. acquisition applied to revolving credit facility |
| $ | 40 | |||||
Fee charged by lender for modification of certain debt covenants applied to revolving credit facility |
| $ | 35 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of UCN, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively UCN or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Such rules and regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, so long as the statements are not misleading. In the opinion of management, these financial statements and accompanying notes contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented herein. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on April 1, 2008. The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for year ended December 31, 2008. The Companys significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
UCNs working capital requirements for the foreseeable future will vary based upon a number of factors, including the costs to expand its service offerings, the costs of marketing its services and the level of sales of the Companys current services. As of June 30, 2008, excluding current deferred revenue of $934,000 which will not require the use of cash, the Company had working capital of $1.0 million. As of December 31, 2007, excluding current deferred revenue of $338,000 which did not require the use of cash, the Company had working capital of $3.6 million. As of June 30, 2008, the Company also has access to additional available borrowings of $3.7 million under the Companys revolving credit facility. Available borrowings are based primarily on outstanding accounts receivable less money drawn from the revolving credit facility. UCNs management believes that existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, and available borrowings under the Companys revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to meet the Companys cash requirements during the next twelve months.
NOTE 2 ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. See Note 10 for discussion of fair value measurements and the impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows entities the option to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value as of specified dates. Such election, which may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis, is typically irrevocable once elected. The Company elected not to measure any additional financial assets or liabilities at fair value at the time SFAS 159 was adopted on January 1, 2008. As a result, implementation of SFAS 159 had no impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110, Year-End Help for Expensing Employee Stock Options (SAB 110). SAB 110 expresses the views of the SEC regarding the use of a simplified or shortcut method, as discussed in SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment, in developing an estimate of expected term of plain vanilla share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. The guidance in SAB 110 was adopted on January 1, 2008, and based on managements assessment, the estimated term of the options used to determine the fair value of the options granted increased from 3.5 years to 4.4 years for standard options. This change in the estimated option term for standard plain vanilla options did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP No. 142-3) to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset (under SFAS No. 142) and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible asset (under SFAS No. 141(R)). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors to be considered when developing renewal or extension assumptions that are used to estimate an intangible assets useful life under SFAS No. 142. The guidance in the new staff position is to be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after December 31, 2008. In addition, FSP No. 142-3 increases the disclosure requirements related to renewal or extension assumptions. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of FSP No. 142-3 on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. The statement establishes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not believe implementation of SFAS 162 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 (SFAS 163). SFAS 163 clarifies how Statement No. 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claim liabilities. This Statement also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS 163 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 163 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF No. 03-6-1). Under FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
7
NOTE 3 BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares plus the weighted average common stock equivalents which would arise from the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the period.
As a result of incurring a net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, no outstanding common stock equivalents are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because such effect would be anti-dilutive. The Company had outstanding options and warrants to purchase a total of 5,625,000 and 5,409,000 shares of common stock at June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
NOTE 4 ACQUISITIONS
On February 9, 2007 and February 15, 2007, UCN completed the acquisitions of BenchmarkPortal, Inc. (BenchmarkPortal) and ScheduleQ, LLC (ScheduleQ), respectively. The Company accounted for both the BenchmarkPortal and ScheduleQ transactions using the purchase method of accounting and has included the operating results of each business in UCNs consolidated statements of operations since the respective date of each acquisition. Management allocated the purchase price to the acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on their respective fair values.
In addition to the amounts paid at closing of the BenchmarkPortal acquisition, UCN agreed to pay contingent purchase price payments to BenchmarkPortal stock holders in the following amounts:
| $2.0 million of additional contingent purchase price cash payments to BenchmarkPortal stockholders in 36 equal monthly installments of $55,556, subject to adjustment if monthly recurring revenue during the payout period from customers accounts acquired in the transaction does not remain at certain levels which are adjusted for estimated attrition; and |
| Up to an additional $7.0 million maximum contingent quarterly earn out to BenchmarkPortal stockholders paid on a variable percentage of recurring revenue from the sale of Echo services in excess of $900,000 per quarter during the four-year period after the acquisition. |
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, BenchmarkPortal stockholders earned a total of $178,000 and $345,000, respectively, in contingent purchase price payments that have been recorded as additional goodwill.
In addition to the amounts paid at closing of the ScheduleQ acquisition, UCN agreed to pay contingent purchase price payments to ScheduleQ stockholders in the following amounts:
| An earn out to be paid over a term of 48 months based on the number of licenses sold by UCN, with a minimum aggregate earn out payment of $100,000 and a maximum of $982,000. |
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, former ScheduleQ stockholders earned a total of $6,000 and $12,000, respectively, in contingent purchase price payments that have been recorded as additional goodwill.
NOTE 5 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 | |||||
Accrued payroll and other compensation |
$ | 1,480 | $ | 1,192 | ||
Accrued payphone and carrier charges |
450 | 626 | ||||
Current portion of deferred operating lease obligations |
412 | 78 | ||||
Accrued professional fees |
250 | 94 | ||||
Other |
161 | 130 | ||||
$ | 2,753 | $ | 2,120 | |||
NOTE 6 LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASES
The Company drew $2.0 million from its revolving credit note with ComVest Capital, LLC during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The revolving credit note bears interest at a fixed rate of nine percent (9.0%) and there are no requirements to repay outstanding principal payments until May 2010.
The Company entered into an equipment leasing facility with an equipment financing company (Lessor) in 2008. Under the terms of the leasing facility, the Lessor has agreed to provide the Company financing of $2.8 million to lease computer related equipment and software for UCNs business operations, which the Lessor will lease to UCN in the form of a capital lease. The term of the facility is 30 months upon acceptance of the leased property by the Company. The calculated interest rate is subject to change based on changes in the Treasury yield, installation period of the lease and the residual value. UCN has utilized $787,000 of the leasing facility at June 30, 2008 to acquire computer related equipment and software which has been recorded to property and equipment and other assets and long-term debt and capital lease obligations.
NOTE 7 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, UCN paid the Chairman of the Board of Directors (Chairman) $6,000 per month for consulting, marketing and capital raising activities. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, UCN paid the Chairman $5,000 per month for consulting, marketing, and capital raising activities.
Between September 2001 and January 2003, the Chairman provided three telecommunications carriers with his personal guaranty of payment up to $800,000. UCN has indemnified the Chairman for any losses for which he may become personally liable. In January and February 2008, UCN received notification that two of the three long distance carriers released the Chairmans personal guaranty, resulting in one remaining personal guaranty totaling $250,000.
8
NOTE 8 CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, employees exercised options to purchase a total of approximately 49,000 shares of common stock and the Company received total proceeds of $105,000.
NOTE 9 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. UCN has allocated stock-based compensation expense to the respective departments based on where the employees regular compensation is charged as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Costs of revenue |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | $ | 2 | ||||
Selling and promotion |
145 | 155 | 274 | 229 | ||||||||
General and administrative |
109 | 214 | 320 | 321 | ||||||||
Research and development |
51 | 33 | 87 | 47 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 307 | $ | 403 | $ | 685 | $ | 599 | ||||
UCN estimated the fair value of options granted under its employee stock-based compensation arrangements at the grant date using the Black-Scholes model. Upon adoption of SAB 110 on January 1, 2008, the Company increased the estimated term of the options used to determine the fair value of standard options granted from 3.5 years, which was based on the short cut method, to 4.4 years, which was based on historical option activity.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, there were 679,000 and 1,342,000 stock options granted, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1.31 and $1.63, respectively. The range of exercise prices for the options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $2.28 to $4.50 and $2.93 to $3.45, respectively.
As of June 30, 2008, there was $1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation awards granted under UCNs stock option plans. The compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.85 years.
NOTE 10 AUCTION RATE PREFERRED SECURITIES
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had investments in auction rate preferred securities (ARPS), which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at fair value. At December 31, 2007, the ARPS were valued based on quoted market prices and classified as current assets. In January 2008, UCN sold $1.0 million of its ARPS at the quoted market prices, which was equal to the carrying value at December 31, 2007. Subsequent to the successful sale in January, the auction events for these instruments held by the Company failed during the first quarter of 2008 and have continued to fail during the second quarter of 2008. Therefore, the fair values of these securities were estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis as of June 30, 2008. This analysis considers, among other items, the collateralization of the underlying security investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows and the expectation of the next time the security is expected to have a successful auction.
As a result of the temporary decline in fair value for the Companys ARPS, which UCN attributes to liquidity issues rather than credit issues, the Company has recorded an unrealized loss of $110,000 at June 30, 2008 to Accumulated other comprehensive loss. The ARPS held by the Company at June 30, 2008, totaling $890,000, were in AAA rated funds. Due to UCNs belief that the market for these instruments may take in excess of twelve months to fully recover, the Company has reclassified these investments as noncurrent and has included them as Auction rate preferred securities on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, UCN continues to earn interest on its ARPS based on the original investment balance of $1.0 million. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these instruments that UCN deems to be temporary, including any recoveries of previously recorded unrealized loss, would be recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive loss. If UCN determines that any future valuation adjustment is other than temporary, it would record a charge to earnings as appropriate.
UCN adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS 157) as of January 1, 2008 for financial instruments. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). These tiers include:
| Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; |
| Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and |
| Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. |
The ARPS were the Companys only assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of SFAS 157 at June 30, 2008. The Company has classified its investment in ARPS as a Level 3 investment as these securities have significant unobservable inputs. The fair value of the investment in ARPS as of June 30, 2008 was $890,000. Based on market conditions, the Company changed its valuation methodology for ARPS to a discounted cash flow analysis during the first quarter of 2008. Accordingly, these securities changed from Level 1 to Level 3 within SFAS 157s hierarchy.
9
The following table presents the Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in SFAS 157 at June 30, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
Auction Rate Preferred Securities |
||||
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
$ | | ||
Transfers to Level 3 |
2,000 | |||
Total unrealized loss included in other comprehensive loss |
(110 | ) | ||
Settlements |
(1,000 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
$ | 890 | ||
There were no changes to Level 3 assets for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
NOTE 11 COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Comprehensive loss equaled net loss of $3,236,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Comprehensive loss totaled $5,990,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and included unrealized losses on auction rate preferred securities. The difference between net loss and comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was as follows (in thousands):
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,880 | ) | |
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities |
(110 | ) | ||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (5,990 | ) | |
NOTE 12 SEGMENTS
Prior to January 1, 2008, UCN managed and reported its financial results based on two customer segments: inContact and Telecom. The inContact segment included all product revenues from customers using at least $100 of inContact services each month as well as their long distance voice and data services. The previous Telecom segment included all voice and data long distance services provided to customers not utilizing at least $100 of inContact services each month.
Effective January 1, 2008, UCNs management changed the way it manages the business and accordingly, UCN is changing the way it reports segments to reflect sales based on its two primary product service segments. The new segments are Software as a Service (SaaS) and Telecom, which is different than the previously reported Telecom segment. The SaaS segment includes all revenues from UCNs all-in-one inContact suite of services, including contact handling, agent optimization and customer experience improvement services. The Telecom segment includes all voice and long distance services provided to customers regardless of their use of SaaS services listed above.
UCNs performance is evaluated by its chief executive officer and other chief decision makers based on reviewing revenue and segment operating income (loss) information for each segment. UCN changed its operating and reporting structure to more effectively analyze the operating results of the different services offered by UCN. As its strategy continues to evolve, the way in which management views financial information to best evaluate performance and operating results may also change.
10
Operating segment revenues and profitability for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, revised to reflect the new segments, were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, 2008 | Three months ended June 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Telecom | SaaS | Consolidated | Telecom | SaaS | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (1) |
$ | 14,752 | $ | 4,533 | $ | 19,285 | $ | 16,471 | $ | 3,504 | $ | 19,975 | ||||||||||||
Costs of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
10,251 | 111 | 10,362 | 11,058 | 70 | 11,128 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and promotion |
1,311 | 2,975 | 4,286 | 1,683 | 2,419 | 4,102 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,116 | 2,048 | 5,164 | 2,995 | 1,169 | 4,164 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
724 | 716 | 1,440 | 800 | 695 | 1,495 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
| 1,078 | 1,078 | | 447 | 447 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (650 | ) | $ | (2,395 | ) | $ | (3,045 | ) | $ | (65 | ) | $ | (1,296 | ) | $ | (1,361 | ) | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2008 | Six months ended June 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Telecom | SaaS | Consolidated | Telecom | SaaS | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (2) |
$ | 30,263 | $ | 8,903 | $ | 39,166 | $ | 34,149 | $ | 5,646 | $ | 39,795 | ||||||||||||
Costs of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
20,666 | 204 | 20,870 | 22,555 | 110 | 22,665 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and promotion |
2,720 | 5,760 | 8,480 | 3,656 | 4,296 | 7,952 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
6,542 | 4,083 | 10,625 | 5,888 | 1,974 | 7,862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,437 | 1,455 | 2,892 | 2,003 | 1,285 | 3,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
| 2,036 | 2,036 | | 875 | 875 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (1,102 | ) | $ | (4,635 | ) | $ | (5,737 | ) | $ | 47 | $ | (2,894 | ) | $ | (2,847 | ) | |||||||
(1) | SaaS segment revenue includes professional services revenue of $218,000 and $256,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(2) | SaaS segment revenue includes professional services revenue of $474,000 and $449,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
11
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Basis of presentation
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2007 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, along with the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in UCNs 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
UCN, Inc. (we, us, our, UCN or the Company) offers a wide range of hosted contact handling and performance management software services, in addition to a variety of connectivity options for carrying an inbound call into its inContact suite of services or linking agents to inContact, including dedicated T1s, IP connectivity, toll free and local inbound numbers. We sell telecom services unbundled from our inContact service offering including: dedicated, switched, toll free, and data lines at competitive prices with superior service levels.
We are in the process of transitioning our business from being a pure telecom services provider to being a Software as a Service (SaaS) provider. Our SaaS offering to users consists primarily of on-demand, hosted, contact handling software we market as our inContact suite and business telecommunication services, which are delivered over our national Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network or other connectivity options. Our inContact application suite includes an integrated package of advanced contact handling, reporting and administration applications as well as performance monitoring and management tools.
We offer our users a set of traditional connectivity products, which include the dedicated voice T1 product, the Intelligent-T, VoIP connectivity services and our switched 1+ services. In addition to long distance, toll-free, and other traditional telephone service, these connectivity options enable our users to connect to our VoIP Network and the complete set of inContact services we have available. Our users publish toll free and local inbound numbers to their customers enabling inbound calls to be handled directly or through the inContact applications embedded in the VoIP Network. Our distribution channels pursue multiple marketing avenues, including using independent agents, value-added resellers and direct and inside sales forces.
Results of Operations
Consolidated Revenue
Consolidated revenue decreased $690,000 to $19.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $20.0 million for the same period in 2007. The decrease is due to a decrease of $1.7 million in Telecom segment revenue due to expected attrition. We have focused more of our sales and marketing efforts on increasing SaaS segment revenue which increased $1.0 million compared to the same period in 2007.
Consolidated revenues decreased $629,000 to $39.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $39.8 million for the same period in 2007. This decrease is due to decreased revenue in our Telecom segment which was down $3.9 million or 11% compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in our Telecom segment is due to expected attrition as we have focused our sales and marketing efforts on increasing customers in our SaaS segment. The decrease is offset by significant increases in SaaS segment revenue which increased $3.3 million or 58% from the same period in 2007. The BenchmarkPortal acquisition in first quarter 2007 allowed us to provide customers a hosted process for measuring the effectiveness of agent interactions with clients. The ScheduleQ acquisition allowed us to provide our customers a hosted solution for automating the scheduling, forecasting and alert notification functions common to most contact center/customer service type operations. These additions augmented our all-in-one hosted inContact solution and accounted for $490,000 of the $3.3 million increase in SaaS segment revenue.
We continue focusing marketing efforts on providing on-demand contact center hosted solution and business telecommunications services delivered over our national VoIP network. We believe the opportunity to increase revenues through the sale of enhanced telecommunications services to business customers is much greater than through the sale of traditional long distance services to residential customers. We have developed a menu of enhanced communication services that are marketed to existing and potential customers through our multiple sales channels. As a result of these changes, we are experiencing a transition in sales mix, which we expect will continue because of our marketing commitment to promote these services.
Costs of revenue
Costs of revenue decreased $766,000 or 7% to $10.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $11.1 million for the same period in 2007. Consistent with other telecommunication companies, we do not include depreciation and amortization in our calculation of costs of revenue. Costs of revenue as a percentage of revenue decreased two percentage points to 54% during the quarter compared to 56% in the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily driven by a our transition in sales mix from Telecom segment revenue that has lower margins to our SaaS technology products and services revenue that has much higher margins.
Costs of revenue decreased $1.8 million or 8% to $20.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $22.7 million for the same period in 2007. Consistent with other telecommunication companies, we do not include depreciation and amortization in our calculation of costs of revenue. Costs of revenue as a percentage of revenue decreased four percentage points to 53% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 57% in the same period in 2007. The decrease in our costs of revenue is primarily driven by a significant decline of $3.9 million in our Telecom segment revenue that has much lower margins than our SaaS technology products and services revenue.
As noted above, we continue to focus most of our marketing efforts on promoting our SaaS segment technology services which carry significantly higher margins than the Telecom segment services. As a result, we expect continued improvements in margins from the sales of our inContact related technology services as we add higher gross margin SaaS segment revenue. We continue to support our telecom reseller channel that markets our telecom products to business users and encourage those resellers to refer inContact opportunities to us.
Selling and promotion
Selling and promotion expenses increased 4% or $184,000 to $4.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $4.1 million during the same period in 2007. This increase is due to an overall increase in the number of sales and lead generation activities related to expanding the inContact suite of services in the market.
Selling and promotion expenses increased 7% or $528,000 to $8.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $8.0 million during the same period in 2007 primarily due to an overall increase in the number of sales and lead generation activities related to expanding the inContact suite of services in the market. Additionally, our sales force grew substantially through the addition of employees related to the BenchmarkPortal and ScheduleQ acquisitions that were completed during the first quarter of 2007.
12
As noted above, we continue to focus most of our marketing efforts on promoting our inContact suite of services.
General and administrative
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased 24% or $1.0 million to $5.2 million compared to $4.2 million in the same period in 2007. The increase is due to an overall increase in salaries and benefits as we significantly increased the number of user support and new user implementation personnel during 2007 which has affected subsequent quarters. Accounting costs also increased related to the additional work required related to our internal control remediation efforts. Furthermore, we moved to a new office building in the fourth quarter of 2007 which resulted in increased facility costs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased 35% or $2.7 million to $10.6 million compared to $7.9 million in the same period in 2007. The increase is due to an overall increase in salaries, benefits, recruiting and training costs as we significantly increased the number of user support and new user implementation personnel during 2007 which has affected subsequent quarters. Our general and administrative staff also grew substantially through the addition of employees related to the BenchmarkPortal and ScheduleQ acquisitions that were completed during the middle of the first quarter of 2007. Legal and accounting costs also increased approximately $600,000 related to the internal investigation, restatement of previously filed financial statements and increased costs related to our internal control material weaknesses. Furthermore, we moved to a new office building in the fourth quarter of 2007 which resulted in increased facility costs for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased 4% or $55,000 to $1.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.5 million during the same period in 2007. The decrease is driven by changes to intangibles related to past acquisitions becoming fully amortized during 2007 offset by an increase in depreciation expense for acquired property and equipment.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased 12% or $396,000 to $2.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $3.3 million during the same period in 2007. The decrease is primarily due to a significant number of intangibles related to past acquisitions becoming fully amortized during the first quarter of 2007.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased 141% or $631,000 to $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $447,000 during the same period in 2007. The increase is driven by an increase in compensation expense related to the addition of new employees in our research and development department as we continue to develop new products and enhance existing products for our inContact suite of services.
Research and development expenses increased 133% or $1.2 million to $2.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $875,000 during the same period in 2007. The increase is due to an increase in compensation expense related to the addition of new employees in our research and development department as we continue to develop new products and enhance existing products for our inContact suite of services.
Other expense
Interest expense decreased $89,000 or 44% during the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease results from a lower outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility in 2008 as compared to 2007 and the conversion of the ComVest Convertible Term Note in April 2007, thereby reducing the amount of debt on which interest is incurred.
Interest expense decreased $234,000 or 58% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease is due to paying off the outstanding balance of our revolving credit facility in the third quarter of 2007 and the conversion of the ComVest Convertible Term Note in April 2007, thereby reducing the amount of debt on which interest is incurred. The decrease was partially offset by interest expense incurred from drawing $2.0 million from our revolving credit facility in the second quarter of 2008.
Segment Reporting
Effective January 1, 2008, we began managing and reporting our financial results based on a product-based segment rather than a customer-based segment. The new segments are SaaS and Telecom. The SaaS segment includes all revenues from UCNs all-in-one inContact suite of services, including contact handling, agent optimization and customer experience improvement services. The Telecom segment includes all voice and long distance services provided to customers.
Prior to January 1, 2008, we managed and reported our financial results based on two customer segments: inContact and Telecom. The inContact segment included all revenues from customers using at least $100 of inContact services each month as well as our long distance voice and data services. The Telecom segment included all voice and data long distance services provided to customers not utilizing at least $100 of inContact services each month.
SaaS Segment Quarterly Results
The SaaS segment revenue increased by $1.0 million or 29% to $4.5 million from $3.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The increase is a result of the selling and promotional efforts we have undertaken to expand these services in the market.
We continue to focus a significant amount of our resources in expanding our inContact suite of services in the market. As a result, selling and promotion expenses in the SaaS segment increased $556,000 or 23% during the quarter compared to the same period in 2007. General and administrative expenses increased $878,000 or 75% during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to a significant increase in the number of user support and new user implementation personnel hired during 2007 to support our SaaS products. We also continue to develop the services provided in the segment by investing in research and development. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we spent $1.1 million in research and development costs as compared to $447,000 for the same period in 2007 and have capitalized an additional $365,000 of costs incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 related to our internally developed software.
The SaaS segment revenue increased by $3.3 million or 58% to $8.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $5.6 million for the same period in 2007. The increase is a result of the selling and promotional efforts we have undertaken to expand these services in the market. Revenue related to sales of services acquired in the BenchmarkPortal and Schedule Q acquisitions in February 2007 provided $2.1 million of revenue in the current six months ended June 30, 2008, an additional $490,000 of revenue as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
13
We continue to focus a significant amount of our resources in expanding our inContact suite of services in the market. As a result, selling and promotion expenses in the SaaS segment increased $1.5 million or 34% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. General and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million or 107% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to a significant increase in the number of user support and new user implementation personnel hired during 2007 to support our SaaS products. We also continue to develop the services provided in the segment by investing in research and development. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we spent $2.0 million in research and development costs as compared to $875,000 for the same period in 2007 and have capitalized an additional $779,000 of costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2008 related to our internally developed software.
Telecom Segment Quarterly Results
We continue to see decreases in the Telecom segment; however the attrition rates are in line with our expectations. Overall segment revenue decreased 10% to $14.8 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was due to the expected attrition of our Telecom customers as we focus our selling and marketing efforts on our SaaS revenue streams. With the decline in revenues from the segment, we reduced overall costs in the segment. Our costs of revenue decreased 7%, selling and promotion expenses decreased 22%, and depreciation and amortization expenses decreased 10% during the current quarter compared to the same period in 2007. These decreases were offset by a 4% increase in general and administrative expenses due to the significant increase in consolidated general administrative expenses.
Telecom segment revenue decreased 11% to $30.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was due to the expected attrition of our Telecom customers as we focus our selling and marketing efforts on our SaaS revenue streams. With the decline in revenues from the segment, we reduced overall costs in the segment. Our costs of revenue decreased 8%, selling and promotion expenses decreased 26% and depreciation and amortization expenses decreased 28% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. These decreases were offset by an 11% increase in general and administrative expenses due to the significant increase in consolidated general administrative expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We experienced net losses of $5.9 million and $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The primary factors affecting operations during the quarter were: 1) $2.9 million of depreciation and amortization; 2) additional legal and auditing expenses of approximately $600,000 associated with the internal investigation, restatement of previously filed financial statements and remediation efforts associated with our material weaknesses; and 3) $685,000 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
Our working capital surplus of $3.3 million at December 31, 2007 decreased to $108,000 at June 30, 2008. The decrease is primarily due to a $1.8 million dollar reduction in accounts receivable, a $596,000 increase in deferred revenue and a $890,000 reclassification of our investments from short-term to long-term. These factors were offset by a $963,000 increase in cash and cash equivalents and a decrease of $181,000 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we generated $11,000 and $1.6 million of cash from operations and financing activities, respectively. We obtained cash from financing activities primarily by borrowing from our revolving credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we used $674,000 of cash in investing activities to acquire property and equipment which was offset by proceeds from selling a portion of our auction-rate preferred securities. We had an overall net cash gain of $963,000 through June 30, 2008. The positive cash flow from operations is very encouraging for us as we continue a more aggressive marketing and promotion strategy of our SaaS products. The amount that we have invested in expanding UCN has provided additional network capacity and provides additional resources to help grow our SaaS product line.
In addition to our $3.7 million of cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2008, we also have access to additional available borrowings under our revolving credit facility that expires in May 2010. The available borrowings under the revolving credit facility were $3.7 million at June 30, 2008, resulting in total cash and additional availability under the revolving credit facility of $7.4 million at June 30, 2008.
Our SaaS segment revenue increased to $8.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008, a 58% increase from the same period in 2007. This increase was a result of the selling and promotion efforts we have undertaken to increase demand for these products in the market. We expect to see continued revenue growth in the SaaS segment in 2008 and 2009.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, employees of UCN exercised options to purchase a total of 49,000 shares of common stock and the Company received total proceeds of $105,000.
Fair Value Measurements
As discussed in Note 10 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we adopted the provisions of Statement 157 effective January 1, 2008. We utilized unobservable (Level 3) inputs in determining the fair value of our auction rate preferred securities, which totaled $890,000 at June 30, 2008.
Our auction rate preferred securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at fair value. In prior periods, due to the auction process which took place every 7-30 days for most securities, quoted market prices were readily available, which would qualify as Level 1 under Statement 157. However, due to events in credit markets during the first quarter of 2008, the auction events for most of these instruments failed and, therefore, we have determined the estimated fair values of these securities utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis as of June 30, 2008. This analysis considers, among other items, the collateralization of the underlying securities, the expected future cash flows and the expectation of the next time the security is expected to have a successful auction. These securities were also compared, when possible, to other observable market data with similar characteristics to the securities held by us. Due to these events, we reclassified these instruments as Level 3 during the first quarter of 2008 and have recorded a temporary unrealized decline in fair value of $110,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, with an offsetting entry to Accumulated other comprehensive loss. We currently believe that this temporary decline in fair value is due entirely to liquidity issues and not credit issues, because they are in AAA closed-end bond mutual funds that are over-collateralized by at least 200% and are backed by the underlying marketable securities. In addition, our holdings of auction rate preferred securities represented only nineteen percent (19%) of our total cash, cash equivalent, and investment balance at June 30, 2008, which we believe allows us sufficient time for the securities to return to original full value. We will re-evaluate each of these factors as market conditions change in subsequent periods.
Critical accounting policies and estimates
A summary of our significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for income taxes and other contingencies as well as asset impairment and collectability of accounts receivable. We use historical and other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However, actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our financial statements.
14
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. See Note 10 for discussion of fair value measurements and the impact on our Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows entities the option to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value as of specified dates. Such election, which may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis, is typically irrevocable once elected. We elected not to measure any additional financial assets or liabilities at fair value at the time we adopted SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008. As a result, implementation of SFAS 159 had no impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110, Year-End Help for Expensing Employee Stock Options (SAB 110). SAB 110 expresses the views of the SEC regarding the use of a simplified or shortcut method, as discussed in SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment, in developing an estimate of expected term of plain vanilla share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. We adopted SAB 110 on January 1, 2008 and based on our evaluation, the estimated term of the options used in determining the fair value of options granted increased from 3.5 years to 4.4 years for standard options. This change in the estimated option term for standard plain vanilla options did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. However, the change could become material depending on the number of options granted in future quarters.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. The statement establishes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not believe implementation of SFAS 162 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 (SFAS 163). SFAS 163 clarifies how Statement No. 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claim liabilities. This Statement also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS 163 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, for us beginning on January 1, 2009. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 163 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF No. 03-6-1). Under FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP No. 142-3) to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset (under SFAS No. 142) and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the intangible asset (under SFAS No. 141(R)). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors to be considered when developing renewal or extension assumptions that are used to estimate an intangible assets useful life under SFAS No. 142. The guidance in the new staff position is to be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after December 31, 2008. In addition, FSP No. 142-3 increases the disclosure requirements related to renewal or extension assumptions. We are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of FSP No. 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.
15
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We have investments in auction rate preferred securities, which are classified as available-for-sale securities and reflected at fair value. Due primarily to instability in credit markets, we sold $1 million of these investments during the first quarter, and ended the second quarter of 2008 with investments valued at a total of $890,000, which are classified in non current assets in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2008. Auction rate securities held at December 31, 2007, were $2 million, all of which were classified as Short-term investments. For a complete discussion on auction rate securities, including the Companys methodology for estimating their fair value, see Note 10 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
We are exposed to interest rate sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Our cash equivalents are invested with high quality issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. Due to the short-term nature of the cash equivalents, we believe that we are not subject to any material interest rate risk as it relates to interest income. All outstanding debt instruments at June 30, 2008 have fixed interest rates and are therefore not subject to interest rate risk.
We did not have any foreign currency hedges or other derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2008. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes and do not currently utilize derivative financial instruments. Our operations are conducted in the United States and, as such, are not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
16
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
This Report includes the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to in those certifications.
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in rules and forms adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this report, UCNs management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008. Because of the material weaknesses in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting described below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer conclude that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2008.
In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we reported that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2007. As described in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we had taken measures to remediate the material weaknesses in the first quarter of 2008. In the course of evaluating and testing the measures taken in the first quarter, management determined that additional changes in the control environment would likely bolster the measures taken to address the material weaknesses in our control environment and financial reporting process that existed at December 31, 2007. Specifically, we have taken the actions described below under Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting to remediate the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. These changes have been implemented as of June 30, 2008; however, management believes these remedial measures need more time to mature for a proper evaluation of the effectiveness of such remedial measures. As the year progresses, we will evaluate the effectiveness of the remedial measures we have taken, and we may formulate and implement additional measures if we determine additional measures will be appropriate or beneficial to the process of maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting and, therefore, effective disclosure controls and procedures.
We have made progress toward achieving effectiveness at a reasonable assurance level in our disclosure controls and procedures. We continue to strive to improve our disclosure controls and procedures to enable us to provide complete and accurate public disclosure on a timely basis. Management believes that the material weakness relating to our disclosure controls will be remediated once we have remediated the material weakness in our control environment and financial reporting process. We are striving to remediate these two material weaknesses on or before September 30, 2008.
Nevertheless, based on the measures taken in the first and second quarters of 2008 and the processes and procedures that were followed after the end of the second quarter in the preparation of the financial information presented in this report, we believe that the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods, presented.
Control Environment
We did not maintain an effective tone at the top that would have facilitated an effective control environment for internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness in our control environment was a result of the following control deficiencies:
| We failed to establish a proper tone for internal control over financial reporting while we were transitioning from a traditional long distance reseller, which is our Telecom segment, to being a network applications provider that provides on-demand, hosted, contact handling software and related services, which was our inContact segment; |
| Members of senior management had the ability to override the proper functioning of our sales and provisioning process for our services, because we failed to recognize and segregate duties that are incompatible from the standpoint of establishing effective checks and balances between senior management; and |
| We did not establish a tone and control consciousness in the Company that fostered effective operation of our open door policy for encouraging employees to communicate issues or concerns with any member of senior management or that instilled in our employees a belief that senior management respected and valued the silent whistleblower process as an important tool for receiving information about UCN and our operations. |
Financial Reporting Process
We identified certain control deficiencies in the financial reporting process as it related to segment reporting, that gave rise to a material weakness. The control deficiencies included the following:
| We did not design and maintain effective financial processes to report and verify at the end of each reporting period that for each inContact customer there was a substantive contract for purchase of inContact Services, inContact services were being used or delivered and that an appropriate price was actually paid for those services after taking into consideration price adjustments or credits that were not reasonably related to other legitimate and customary sales practices, customer maintenance or Telecom service; and |
| We did not generate, for senior management and persons with responsibility for accounting controls, period-end financial reports on inContact service usage and total service price adjustments or credits on a comparative basis with inContact and Telecom revenue, so that senior management and persons with responsibility for accounting controls had the type of information that would enable them to reasonably be able to detect purported inContact service sales for which there was no or little service usage and/or inContact revenue that was completely or substantially offset by pricing adjustments or credits that were given to effect a spurious inContact sale. |
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The following are changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Managements Actions during the quarter ended June 30, 2008
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we implemented the following controls that management believes are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting and that are intended to help address the material weaknesses described above.
17
| We hired a Vice President of Treasury and Financial Reporting and an Assistant Controller. Both of these individuals are licensed Certified Public Accountants and were hired, in part, due to their knowledge and experience with internal controls over financial reporting and revenue recognition. |
| We made significant enhancements to the role of our Risk Assessment Committee. Specifically, our Risk Assessment Committee meets to monitor and identify specific fraud risks relating to the Companys financial reporting. The Committee is chaired by the Companys Chief Financial Officer and employees from various functional departments and levels within the Company are required to attend. The focus of the Risk Assessment Committee is to use the knowledge and insight of various Company employees to better identify fraud risks over financial reporting that are applicable specifically to the Companys business and discuss appropriate actions to mitigate such fraud risks and monitor those actions. |
| On a monthly basis, the Finance Department reviews all executed SaaS contracts to determine whether revenue has been properly recognized in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Contracts are also reviewed to monitor the Companys established policy that segregates incompatible functions in the sales, pricing and provisioning processes. |
| We have quarterly revenue recognition meetings to clarify and communicate the revenue recognition process from the initiation of a sale until it is reported in the financial statements. These meetings are held with members of the Billing, Finance, Implementation, Products, and Sales Departments. |
| We formally adopted the practice of assessing managements maintenance of effective internal controls over financial reporting as part of our annual performance measure. We believe establishing a formal and direct link between this function and the evaluation of managements performance, which affects compensation, reinforces our view that effective controls over financial reporting are a significant part of managements job that should be evaluated as an important element of overall performance. We believe this practice is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting because of the direct impact on the control environment at the management level. |
We will test and evaluate the procedures and controls implemented in the first two quarters of 2008 as the year progresses to determine whether they effectively remediate the material weaknesses described above. We are committed to continuing to improve our internal control processes and will continue to diligently and vigorously review our financial reporting controls and procedures. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or determine to modify certain of the remediation measures described above.
18
PART II
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
UCN is the subject of certain legal matters, which it considers incidental to its business activities. It is the opinion of management, after discussion with legal counsel, that the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material impact on the financial position, liquidity or results of operations of UCN.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by UCN, except where such statements are made in connection with an initial public offering. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, which address activities, actions, goals, prospects, or new developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as expansion and growth of our operations and other such matters are forward-looking statements. Any one or a combination of factors could materially affect our operations and financial condition. These factors include competitive pressures, success or failure of marketing programs, changes in pricing and availability of services and products offered to customers, legal and regulatory initiatives affecting software or long distance service, and conditions in the capital markets. Forward-looking statements made by us are based on knowledge of our business and the environment in which we operate as of the date of this report. Because of the factors discussed in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in subsequent reports on Form 10-Q under the Item 1A Risk Factors, actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
On June 23, 2008, UCN issued compensatory options to two employees for the purchase a total of 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.28 per share. The options are exercisable over a term of five years and vest in three annual equal installments. The options were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
On August 5, 2008, the Board of Directors approved, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, an Executive Officer Bonus Plan for the third and fourth quarters of 2008. The participants in the plan are Paul Jarman, Chief Executive Officer, Brian Moroney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Scott Welch, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Rudy Vidal, Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer and Frank Maylett, Executive Vice President of Sales.
The plan is a variable cash based incentive plan under which bonus is earned based on achieving stated performance targets. The sole performance factor measured under the plan for the applicable periods is UCNs consolidated cumulative gross margin (revenue less costs of revenue, excluding depreciation and amortization) as of the end of the third and fourth calendar quarters of 2008. The gross margin targets are set at levels based on UCNs budget for the applicable periods, which are targets the Compensation Committee believes are likely to be achieved, but not assured. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other management personnel, have significant participation in formulating the budget approved by the Board, and also participate in formulating bonus compensation proposals submitted to the Compensation Committee for consideration. However, the decision on the form and substance of the bonus plan is made by the Compensation Committee and ratified by the Board.
UCN must achieve 100% of the gross margin target for the applicable period in order for each participant to earn the maximum bonus payment. If UCN does not achieve at least 80% of the gross margin target for the applicable period, no bonus is paid for that period and cannot be recouped on the basis for cumulative performance in later periods. If 80% of the gross margin target is achieved, each participant will earn 50% of the maximum bonus payment. If more than 80%, but less than 100%, of the gross margin target is achieved, the amount of the bonus payment increases proportionately (2.5% more of bonus payment for each 1.0% increase in the gross margin target achieved).
The following table shows the maximum bonus that may be earned for the participating executive officers under the plan if the cumulative gross margin target for third and fourth quarters of 2008 is achieved, and assuming UCN achieves 80% and 90% of the target.
Q3 Bonus Payment Assuming | |||||||||
Name |
80% of Target Achieved |
90% of Target Achieved |
100% of Target Achieved | ||||||
Paul Jarman |
$ | 15,750 | $ | 23,625 | $ | 31,500 | |||
Brian Moroney |
$ | 11,250 | $ | 16,875 | $ | 22,500 | |||
Scott Welch |
$ | 11,250 | $ | 16,875 | $ | 22,500 | |||
Rudy Vidal |
$ | 7,650 | $ | 11,475 | $ | 15,300 | |||
Frank Maylett |
$ | 7,313 | $ | 10,969 | $ | 14,625 | |||
Q4 Bonus Payment Assuming | |||||||||
Name |
80% of Target Achieved |
90% of Target Achieved |
100% of Target Achieved | ||||||
Paul Jarman |
$ | 18,375 | $ | 27,563 | $ | 36,750 | |||
Brian Moroney |
$ | 13,125 | $ | 19,688 | $ | 26,250 | |||
Scott Welch |
$ | 13,125 | $ | 19,688 | $ | 26,250 | |||
Rudy Vidal |
$ | 8,925 | $ | 13,388 | $ | 17,850 | |||
Frank Maylett |
$ | 8,531 | $ | 12,797 | $ | 17,063 |
The Compensation Committee believes gross margin is an important performance measure. UCN manages its business and reports financial results based on product-based segments; software as a service (SaaS) and Telecom. The SaaS segment includes all revenues from providing automatic call distribution, interactive voice response, data storage, email, chat, computer telephony integration call recording, conferencing and reporting to customers including our all-in-one inContact suite of services. The Telecom segment includes all voice and long distance services provided to customers. Since the end of 2005, UCN has focused its business development and marketing efforts on promoting the SaaS segment technology services, which carry significantly higher margins than the Telecom segment services. Accordingly, we believe the amount of consolidated gross margin is a meaningful indicator of executive officer performance in achieving UCNs business goals, because increasing gross margin indicates increasing revenue from higher margin SaaS revenue. The Compensation Committee believes the plan will foster performance in this area by tying bonus to gross margin targets.
19
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit No. |
Title of Document | |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UCN, INC. | ||||||||
Date: August 11, 2008 | By: | /s/ Paul Jarman | ||||||
Paul Jarman | ||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||
Date: August 11, 2008 | By: | /s/ Brian S. Moroney | ||||||
Brian S. Moroney Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
21