UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from To
Commission file Number 34603-9
MVB Financial Corp.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
West Virginia | 20-0034461 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
301 Virginia Avenue, Fairmont, WV | 26554 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Issuers telephone number (304) 363-4800
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
None |
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $1.00 Par
(Title of Class)
Preferred Stock $1,000.00 Par
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.
State issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year $ 11,251,000
Based upon the average selling price of sales known to the Registrant of the common shares of the Registrant through March 27, 2007, the aggregate market value of the common shares of the Registrant held by non affiliates during that time was $16,439,744. For this purpose certain executive officers and directors are considered affiliates.
As of March 27, 2007, the Registrant had 1,467,849 shares of common stock outstanding with a par value of $1.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of MVBs definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting to be held May 15, 2007 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ¨; No x
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
Item 1. |
Description of Business | 3 | ||
Item 2. |
Description of Property | 9 | ||
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings | 9 | ||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 9 | ||
Item 5. |
Market for Equity and Related Stockholder Matters | 9 | ||
Item 6. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis | 10 | ||
Item 7. |
Financial Statements | 27 | ||
Item 8. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 48 | ||
Item 8A. |
Controls and Procedures | 48 | ||
Item 8B. |
Other Information | 48 | ||
Item 9. |
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act | 49 | ||
Item 10. |
Executive Compensation | 49 | ||
Item 11. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 49 | ||
Item 12. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence | 49 | ||
Item 13. |
Exhibits. | 50 | ||
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 50 |
ITEM 1. | DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS |
MVB Financial Corp., or MVB, was formed on January 1, 2004 as a bank holding company. MVB Bank, Inc., or the Bank, was formed on October 30, 1997 and chartered under the laws of the state of West Virginia. The Bank commenced operations on January 4, 1999. During the fourth quarter of 2004, MVB formed two second-tier holding companies MVB Marion, Inc. and MVB Harrison, Inc. to manage the banking operations of MVB, the sole bank subsidiary, in those markets. In August of 2005, MVB opened a full service office in neighboring Harrison County. During October of 2005 MVB purchased a branch office in Jefferson County, situated in West Virginias eastern panhandle. In 2006 MVB formed another second-tier holding company, MVB East, Inc. to manage the banking operations of MVB in the Jefferson and Berkeley county markets.
MVB operates four offices, two of which are located in Marion County, the main office located at 301 Virginia Avenue in Fairmont and a branch office at 2500 Fairmont Avenue inside the Shop N Save Supermarket in White Hall, WV. The remaining offices are located at 1000 Johnson Avenue in Bridgeport, Harrison County, and 88 Somerset Boulevard in Charles Town, Jefferson County. At December 31, 2006, MVB had total assets of $191.3 million, total loans of $142.6 million, total deposits of $134.6 million and total stockholders equity of $21.7 million.
MVBs business activities are currently confined to a single segment which is community banking. As a community banking entity, MVB offers its customers a full range of products through various delivery channels. Such products and services include checking accounts, NOW accounts, money market and savings accounts, time certificates of deposit, commercial, installment, commercial real estate and residential real estate mortgage loans, debit cards, and safe deposit rental facilities. MVB also offers travelers checks and official checks. Services are provided through our walk-in offices, automated teller machines (ATMs), drive-in facilities, and internet and telephone banking. Additionally, MVB offers non-deposit investment products through an association with a broker-dealer.
At December 31, 2006, MVB had 59 full-time and 8 part-time employees. MVBs principal office is located at 301 Virginia Avenue, Fairmont, West Virginia 26554, and its telephone number is (304) 363-4800. MVBs Internet web site is www.mvbbanking.com.
Since the opening date of January 4, 1999, MVB has experienced significant growth in assets, loans, and deposits due to overwhelming community and customer support in the Marion and Harrison county markets.
During 2006, MVB continued to focus on growth in the Harrison and Jefferson County areas as the primary method for reaching performance goals. MVB continuously reviews key performance indicators to measure our success.
Recent Additions
During the fourth quarter of 2006, MVB began construction of a full service banking facility in the Martinsburg area of Berkeley County West Virginia.
Market Area
MVBs primary market areas are the Marion, Harrison and Jefferson Counties of West Virginia, which includes a total of 64 banking facilities. Its extended market is the adjacent counties of Monongalia, Taylor and Berkeley Counties, West Virginia. Other offices are located in the thriving Bridgeport area of Harrison County and the rapidly growing Jefferson County area in West Virginias eastern panhandle.
United States Census Bureau data indicates that the Fairmont and Marion County, West Virginia populations have had somewhat different trends from 1980 to 2000. The population of Fairmont has fluctuated from 23,863 in 1980; 20,210 in 1990 and 21,678 in 2000, or a net decline of 2,185 or 9.2%. Marion County increased its population from
3
1980 to 1990, 55,789 to 57,249, and decreased to 56,598 in 2000. These changes resulted in a net increase of 1.45%. The Marion County population includes that of Fairmont. The result is that over the last 20 years, there has not been any significant change in population. Harrison Countys population has decreased from 69,371 in 1990 to 68,652 in 2000, while Bridgeports population has increased from 7,306 in 2000 to an estimated 7,598 in 2006, indicating that while population change in Harrison County has been relatively flat, the Bridgeport area is growing. The population in Jefferson County has been on the rise in recent years, increasing from 42,190 in 2000 to 49,206 in 2005. During this period, Charles Town has seen an increase in population of 16.6%.
Unemployment in Marion County has improved compared to that of the State of West Virginia from November 1995 through December 2006. As of December 2006, the overall state rate was 4.6% compared to 3.9% for Marion County. During this same period of time, the Marion County Unemployment Rate has decreased from 8.9% to 3.9%, while the West Virginia rate declined from 7.5% to 4.6%. At December 31, 2006, Harrison and Jefferson counties showed unemployment rates of 4.4% and 2.7%, respectively. Jefferson Countys unemployment rate is much better than the state average, Marion Countys rate is better than the state average, and Harrison Countys rate is about that of the state average. The future direction of unemployment will probably be driven by what occurs economically on a national level.
MVB originates various types of loans, including commercial and commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, real estate construction loans, and consumer loans (loans to individuals). In general, MVB retains most of its originated loans (exclusive of certain long-term, fixed rate residential mortgages that are sold servicing released). However, loans originated in excess of MVBs legal lending limit are participated to other banking institutions and the servicing of those loans is retained by MVB. MVB has no loans to foreign entities. MVBs lending market area is primarily concentrated in the Marion, Harrison and Jefferson Counties of West Virginia.
Commercial Loans
At December 31, 2006, MVB had outstanding approximately $83.1 million in commercial loans, including commercial, commercial real estate, financial and agricultural loans. These loans represented approximately 58.3% of the total aggregate loan portfolio as of that date.
Lending Practices. Commercial lending entails significant additional risks as compared with consumer lending (i.e., single-family residential mortgage lending, and installment lending). In addition, the payment experience on commercial loans typically depends on adequate cash flow of a business and thus may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the general economy or in a specific industry. Loan terms include amortization schedules commensurate with the purpose of each loan, the source of repayment and the risk involved. The primary analysis technique used in determining whether to grant a commercial loan is the review of a schedule of estimated cash flows to evaluate whether anticipated future cash flows will be adequate to service both interest and principal due. In addition, MVB reviews collateral to determine its value in relation to the loan in the event of a foreclosure.
MVB evaluates all new commercial loans, and on an annual basis mortgage loans in excess of $300,000, as well as customers that have total outstanding loans that aggregate more than $500,000. If deterioration in credit worthiness has occurred, MVB takes effective and prompt action designed to assure repayment of the loan. Upon detection of the reduced ability of a borrower to meet original cash flow obligations, the loan is considered a classified loan and reviewed for possible downgrading or placement on non-accrual status.
Consumer Loans
At December 31, 2006, MVB had outstanding consumer loans in an aggregate amount of approximately $11.4 million or approximately 8% of the aggregate total loan portfolio.
4
Lending Practices. Consumer loans generally involve more risk as to collectibility than mortgage loans because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain instances, the absence of collateral. As a result, consumer lending collections are dependent upon the borrowers continued financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by employment loss, personal bankruptcy, or adverse economic conditions. Credit approval for consumer loans requires demonstration of sufficiency of income to repay principal and interest due, stability of employment, a positive credit record and sufficient collateral for secured loans. It is the policy of MVB to review its consumer loan portfolio monthly and to charge off loans that do not meet its standards and to adhere strictly to all laws and regulations governing consumer lending.
Real Estate Loans
At December 31, 2006, MVB had approximately $48.1 million of residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and construction mortgages outstanding, representing 33.7% of total loans outstanding.
Lending Practices. MVB generally requires that the residential real estate loan amount be no more than 80% of the purchase price or the appraised value of the real estate securing the loan, unless the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance for the percentage exceeding 80%. Occasionally, MVB may lend up to 100% of the appraised value of the real estate. The risk conditions of these loans are considered during underwriting for the purposes of establishing an interest rate compatible with the risks inherent in mortgage lending and based on the equity of the home. Loans made in this lending category are generally one to five year adjustable rate, fully amortizing to maturity mortgages. MVB also originates fixed rate real estate loans and generally sells these loans in the secondary market, servicing released. All real estate loans are secured by first mortgages with evidence of title in favor of MVB in the form of an attorneys opinion of the title or a title insurance policy. MVB also requires proof of hazard insurance with MVB named as the mortgagee and as the loss payee. Generally, full appraisals are obtained from licensed appraisers for all loans secured by real estate.
Home Equity Loans. Home equity lines of credit are generally made as second mortgages by MVB. The maximum amount of a home equity line of credit is generally limited to 80% of the appraised value of the property less the balance of the first mortgage. MVB will lend up to 100% of the appraised value of the property at higher interest rates which are considered compatible with the additional risk assumed in these types of loans. The home equity lines of credit are written with 10 year terms, but are subject to review upon request for renewal.
Construction Loans. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the propertys value at completion of construction and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. If the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, MVB may advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the project.
Competition
MVB experiences significant competition in attracting depositors and borrowers. Competition in lending activities comes principally from other commercial banks, savings associations, insurance companies, governmental agencies, credit unions, brokerage firms and pension funds. The primary factors in competing for loans are interest rate and overall lending services. Competition for deposits comes from other commercial banks, savings associations, money market funds and credit unions as well as from insurance companies and brokerage firms. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates paid on deposits, account liquidity, convenience of office
location, and overall financial condition. MVB believes that its community approach provides flexibility, which enables the bank to offer an array of banking products and services.
5
MVB primarily focuses on the Marion, Harrison and Jefferson County markets for its products and services. Management believes MVB has developed a niche and a level of expertise in serving this area.
MVB operates under a needs-based selling approach that management believes has proven successful in serving the financial needs of most customers. It is not MVBs strategy to compete solely on the basis of interest rates. Management believes that a focus on customer relationships and service will promote our customers continued use of MVBs financial products and services and will lead to enhanced revenue opportunities.
Supervision and Regulation
The following is a summary of certain statutes and regulations affecting MVB and its subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations:
Bank Holding Company Regulation. MVB is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, which restricts the activities of MVB and any acquisition by MVB of voting stock or assets of any bank, savings association or other company. MVB is also subject to the reporting requirements of, and examination and regulation by, the Federal Reserve Board. MVBs subsidiary bank, MVB Bank, Inc., is subject to restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on transactions with affiliates, including any loans or extensions of credit to MVB or its subsidiaries, investments in the stock or other securities thereof and the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower; the issuance of guarantees, acceptances or letters of credit on behalf of MVB and its subsidiaries; purchases or sales of securities or other assets; and the payment of money or furnishing of services to MVB and other subsidiaries. MVB is prohibited from acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of any class of voting stock or substantially all of the assets of any bank holding company without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. MVB and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with extensions of credit and/or the provision of other property or services to a customer by MVB or its subsidiaries.
On July 30, 2002, the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States (Congress) enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a law that addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. The New York Stock Exchange proposed corporate governance rules that were enacted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The changes are intended to allow stockholders to more easily and efficiently monitor the performance of companies and directors and should not significantly impact MVB.
Effective August 29, 2002, as directed by Section 302(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley, MVBs chief executive officer and chief financial officer are each required to certify that MVBs Quarterly and Annual Reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of MVBs internal controls; they have made certain disclosures to MVBs auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about MVBs internal controls; and they have included information in MVBs Quarterly and Annual Reports about their evaluation and whether there have been significant changes in MVBs internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the evaluation.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999) permits bank holding companies to become financial holding companies. This allows them to affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and to engage in other activities that are financial in nature. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized, is well managed and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act. No regulatory approval will be required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board.
6
The Financial Services Modernization Act defines financial in nature to include: securities underwriting, dealing and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and agency; merchant banking activities; and activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be closely related to banking. A bank also may engage, subject to limitations on investment, in activities that are financial in nature, other than insurance underwriting, insurance company portfolio investment, real estate development and real estate investment, through a financial subsidiary of the bank, if the bank is well capitalized, well managed and has at least a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating.
Banking Subsidiary Regulation. MVB Bank, Inc. was chartered as a state bank and is regulated by the West Virginia Division of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank provides FDIC insurance on its deposits and is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh.
International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act)
The International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 (the Patriot Act) was adopted in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The Patriot Act provides law enforcement with greater powers to investigate terrorism and prevent future terrorist acts. Among the broad-reaching provisions contained in the Patriot Act are several designed to deter terrorists ability to launder money in the United States and provide law enforcement with additional powers to investigate how terrorists and terrorist organizations are financed. The Patriot Act creates additional requirements for banks, which were already subject to similar regulations. The Patriot Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to require financial institutions to take certain special measures when the Secretary suspects that certain transactions or accounts are related to money laundering. These special measures may be ordered when the Secretary suspects that a jurisdiction outside of the United States, a financial institution operating outside of the United States, a class of transactions involving a jurisdiction outside of the United States or certain types of accounts are of primary money laundering concern. The special measures include the following: (a) require financial institutions to keep records and report on the transactions or accounts at issue; (b) require financial institutions to obtain and retain information related to the beneficial ownership of any account opened or maintained by foreign persons; (c)require financial institutions to identify each customer who is permitted to use a payable-through or correspondent account and obtain certain information from each customer permitted to use the account; and (d) prohibit or impose conditions on the opening or maintaining of correspondent or payable-through accounts.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
The FDIC insures the deposits of the Bank which is subject to the applicable provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. The FDIC may terminate a banks deposit insurance upon finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition enacted or imposed by the banks regulatory agency.
Federal Home Loan Bank
The FHLB provides credit to its members in the form of advances. As a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, the Bank must maintain an investment in the capital stock of that FHLB in an amount equal to the greater of 1.0% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of its respective residential mortgage loans, home purchase contracts and similar obligations at the beginning of each year, or 5% of its advances from the FHLB.
7
Capital Requirements
Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. For further discussion regarding the Banks risk-based capital requirements, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Financial Statements included in Item 7 of this Form 10-KSB.
West Virginia Division of Banking. State banks, such as MVB Bank, Inc. are subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the West Virginia Division of Banking.
Limits on Dividends
MVBs ability to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for other cash requirements largely depends on the amount of dividends the Bank declares. However, the Federal Reserve Board expects MVB to serve as a source of strength to the Bank. The Federal Reserve Board may require MVB to retain capital for further investment in the Bank, rather than pay dividends to its shareholders. MVB Bank, Inc. may not pay dividends to MVB if, after paying those dividends, the Bank would fail to meet the required minimum levels under the risk-based capital guidelines and the minimum leverage ratio requirements. The Bank must have the approval from the West Virginia Department of Banking if a dividend in any year would cause the total dividends for that year to exceed the sum of the current years net earnings as defined and the retained earnings for the preceding two years as defined, less required transfers to surplus. These provisions could limit MVBs ability to pay dividends on its outstanding common shares.
Federal and State Consumer Laws
MVB Bank, Inc. is subject to regulatory oversight under various consumer protection and fair lending laws. These laws govern, among other things, truth-in-lending disclosure, equal credit opportunity, fair credit reporting and community reinvestment. Failure to abide by federal laws and regulations governing community reinvestment could limit the ability of a bank to open a new branch or engage in a merger transaction. Community reinvestment regulations evaluate how well and to what extent a bank lends and invests in its designated service area, with particular emphasis on low-to-moderate income communities and borrowers in such areas.
Monetary Policy and Economic Conditions
The business of financial institutions is affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various governmental regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates to influence general economic conditions primarily through open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings and changes in the reserve requirements against depository institutions deposits. These policies and regulations significantly affect the overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits, and the interest rates charged on loans, as well as the interest rates paid on deposit accounts.
The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions in the past and are expected to continue to have significant effects in the future. In view of the changing conditions in the economy and the money markets and the activities of monetary and fiscal authorities, MVB cannot predict future changes in interest rates, credit availability or deposit levels.
Effect of Environmental Regulation
MVBs primary exposure to environmental risk is through its lending activities. In cases when management believes environmental risk potentially exists, MVB mitigates its environmental risk exposures by requiring environmental site assessments at the time of loan origination to confirm collateral quality as to commercial real estate parcels
8
posing higher than normal potential for environmental impact, as determined by reference to present and past uses of the subject property and adjacent sites. Environmental assessments are typically required prior to any foreclosure activity involving non-residential real estate collateral.
With regard to residential real estate lending, management reviews those loans with inherent environmental risk on an individual basis and makes decisions based on the dollar amount of the loan and the materiality of the specific credit.
MVB anticipates no material effect on anticipated capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position as a result of compliance with federal, state or local environmental protection laws or regulations.
ITEM 2. | DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY |
MVB Bank, Inc. owns its main office located at 301 Virginia Avenue in Fairmont, along with its offices at 1000 Johnson Avenue in Bridgeport and 88 Somerset Boulevard in Charles Town. The Bank leases its office at 2500 Fairmont Avenue inside the Shop N Save supermarket in White Hall, in addition to the land at the Bridgeport location.
Additional information concerning the property and equipment owned or leased by MVB and its subsidiaries is incorporated herein by reference from Note 4, Bank Premises and Equipment and Note 16, Leases of the Notes to the Financial Statements included in Item 7 of this Form 10-KSB.
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
There are no pending legal proceedings to which MVB or its subsidiaries are a party or to which any of their property is subject.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
MVBs common shares are not traded on any national exchange.
The table presented below sets forth the estimated market value for the indicated periods based upon sales known to management with respect to MVBs common shares. The information set forth in the table is based on MVBs knowledge of certain arms-length transactions in the stock. In addition, dividends are subject to the restrictions described in Note 15 to the financial statements.
Quarterly Market and Dividend Information:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
Estimated Market Value Per Share |
Dividend | Estimated Market Value Per Share |
Dividend | |||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 16.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 16.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
Third Quarter |
16.00 | 0.00 | 16.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
Second Quarter |
16.00 | 0.00 | 14.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
First Quarter |
16.00 | 0.00 | 14.00 | 0.00 |
MVB had 943 stockholders of record at December 31, 2006.
9
ITEM 6. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Forward-looking Statements:
The following discussion contains statements that refer to future expectations, contain projections of the results of operations or of financial condition, or state other information that is forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are easily identified by the use of words such as could, anticipate, estimate, believe, and similar words that refer to a future outlook. There is always a degree of uncertainty associated with forward-looking statements. MVBs management believes that the expectations reflected in such statements are based upon reasonable assumptions and on the facts and circumstances existing at the time of these disclosures. Actual results could differ significantly from those anticipated.
Many factors could cause MVBs actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Some factors, which could negatively affect the results, include:
| General economic conditions, either nationally or within MVBs market, could be less favorable than expected; |
| Changes in market interest rates could affect interest margins and profitability; |
| Competitive pressures could be greater than anticipated; |
| Legal or accounting changes could affect MVBs results; and |
| Adverse changes could occur in the securities and investments markets. |
In Managements Discussion and Analysis we review and explain the general financial condition and the results of operations for MVB Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries. We have designed this discussion to assist you in understanding the significant changes in MVBs financial condition and results of operations. We have used accounting principles generally accepted in the United States to prepare the accompanying consolidated financial statements. We engaged Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. to audit the consolidated financial statements and their independent audit report is included in Item 7 herein.
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis of the Consolidated Financial Statements of MVB is presented to provide insight into managements assessment of the financial results and operations of MVB. MVB Bank, Inc. is the sole operating subsidiary of MVB and all comments, unless otherwise noted, are related to the Bank. You should read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes and the ratios and statistics contained elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
MVBs consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles and follow general practices within the banking industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available. When third-party information is not available, valuation adjustments are estimated in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal forecasting techniques.
10
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Bank are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in managements discussion and analysis of operations, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses to be the accounting area that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of losses inherent in classifications of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience of peer banks, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. Non-homogeneous loans are specifically evaluated due to the increased risks inherent in those loans. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type in the consolidated balance sheet. Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses and a discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this financial review.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 will be effective for the Companys fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently reviewing the effect FIN 48 will have on its financial statements but does not expect that adoption of FIN 48 will materially impact our financial position, income or cash flows.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS N. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to investors request for expanded information about the extent to which a company measures assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently reviewing the effect SFAS 157 will have on its financial statements.
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS no. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, and amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires the Company to (a) recognize in its statement of financial position the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation, (b) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits that arise
11
during the period, (c) measure defined benefit plan assets and defined benefit plan obligations as of the date of the Companys statement of financial position, and (d) disclose additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit costs in the upcoming fiscal year that arise from the delayed recognition of the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits. An employer with publicly traded equity securities is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FASB 158 did not have a material effect on the financial statements.
Share-Based Payment
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (FASB 123R). In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) adopted a rule permitting implementation of FASB 123R at the beginning of the fiscal year commencing after June 15, 2005. Under the provisions of FASB 123R, an entity is required to treat all stock-based compensation as a cost that is reflected in the financial statements. The Company was required to adopt SFAS 123R beginning in its fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006. The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method whereby the Company must recognize the expense only for periods beginning after December 31, 2005. The adoption of FASB 123R had no impact upon the financial statements.
Several other new accounting standards became effective during the periods presented or will be effective subsequent to December 31, 2006. None of these new standards had or is expected to have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Summary Financial Results
MVB earned $973,000 in 2006 compared to $562,000 in 2005. The earnings equated to a 2006 return on average assets of .58% and a return on average equity of 4.86%, compared to prior year results of .45% and 4.34%, respectively. Basic earnings per share was $.68 in 2006 compared to $.57 in 2005. Diluted earnings per share was $.67 in 2006 compared to $.56 in 2005. The most significant factor in the increase in 2006 profitability was the performance of two offices added in 2005. Salaries expense increased by $412,000, mostly relating to staffing of the additional offices for a full year. Occupancy and equipment depreciation and maintenance increased by $146,000 and $63,000 respectively, all relating to a full years operations at the two additional offices. Data processing expense increased by $128,000, a result of an increased volume of transactions and the increased offering of additional services such as online banking and bill payment. Interest income increased by $3.4 million to $10.0 million and interest expense increased by $2.0 million to $4.3 million, resulting in an increase in net interest income of $1.3 million, mainly relating to the improved perfomance of the new offices. Other income increased by $364,000, $128,000 of which related to income on loans held for sale and $117,000 in additional service charges on deposit accounts. The 2006 results support MVBs belief that it has added further value to the franchise by establishing a presence in what we believe are two of the better markets in West Virginia. As these locations have time to develop further in 2007, results of operations should continue to reap the rewards of the outlay of expenditures in 2005.
While operating in a challenging interest rate environment, the Bank achieved a 6.59% yield on earning assets in 2006 compared to 5.83% in 2005. Despite extensive competition, total loans increased to $142.6 million at December 31, 2006, from $105.2 million at December 31, 2005. The Banks ability to originate quality loans is supported by a minimal delinquency rate and non-accrual and impaired loans totaling only $5,000 at December 31, 2006.
Deposits increased to $134.6 million at December 31, 2006, from $114.0 million at December 31, 2005, due in large part to MVBs expansion into the Harrison and Jefferson County markets. MVB offers an uncomplicated product design accompanied by a simple fee
12
structure that is attractive to customers. The overall cost of funds for the bank was 3.32% in 2006 compared to 2.36% in 2005. This cost of funds, combined with the earning asset yield, resulted in a net interest margin of 3.72% in 2006 compared to 3.79% in 2005.
The Bank maintained a high-quality, short-term investment portfolio during 2006 to provide liquidity in the balance sheet, to fund loan growth, for repurchase agreements and to provide security for state and municipal deposits.
Interest Income and Expense
Net interest income is the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-earning assets include loans and investment securities. Interest-bearing liabilities include interest-bearing deposits, borrowed funds such as sweep accounts, and repurchase agreements. Net interest income remains the primary source of revenue for MVB. Net interest income is also impacted by changes in market interest rates, as well as the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is also impacted favorably by increases in non-interest bearing demand deposits and equity.
Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets and serves as a measurement of the net revenue stream generated by MVBs balance sheet. As noted above, the net interest margin was 3.72% in 2006 compared to 3.79% in 2005. The net interest margin continues to face considerable pressure due to competitive pricing of loans and deposits in MVBs markets. During 2006, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates four times for a total increase of 1.00% which had a negative impact on MVBs interest margin. Managements estimate of the impact of future changes in market interest rates is shown in the section captioned Interest Rate Risk.
Management continues to analyze methods to deploy MVBs assets into an earning asset mix which will result in a stronger net interest margin. Loan growth continues to be strong and management anticipates that loan activity will remain strong in the near term future.
During 2006, net interest income increased by $1.3 million or 30.7% to $5.6 million in 2006 from $4.3 million in 2005. This increase is largely due to the growth in average earning assets, primarily $37.6 million in loans. Average total earning assets were $151.8 million in 2006 compared to $114.0 million in 2005. Average total loans grew to $124.8 million in 2006 from $87.1 million in 2005. Primarily as a result of this growth, total interest income increased by $3.4 million, or 50.5%, to $10.0 million in 2006 from $6.6 million in 2005. Average interest-bearing liabilities, mainly deposits, likewise increased in 2006 by $32.8 million. Average interest-bearing deposits grew to $103.1 million in 2006 from $83.6 million in 2005. Total interest expense increased by $2.0 million or 87.5%, to $4.4 million in 2006 from $2.4 million in 2005. This increase in interest expense was the result of a 96 basis point increase in interest cost from 2005 to 2006, along with an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities of $32.8 million.
The growth in the volume of earning assets during 2006 and the rate increases by the Federal Reserve combined to result in the yield on earning assets improving to 6.59% in 2006 from 5.83% in 2005. The loan portfolio yield increased by 57 basis points, due mainly to the volume of adjustable rate loans repricing as interest rates increased, while MVBs investment portfolio yield increased by 54 basis points and interest-bearing deposits in banks yield increased by 128 basis points.
The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased to 3.32% in 2006 from 2.36% in 2005. This increase is primarily the result of the higher interest rates paid on money market accounts, certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts, repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.
13
Statistical Financial Information Regarding MVB Financial Corp.
The following tables provide further information about MVBs interest income and expense:
Average Balances and Analysis of Net Interest Income:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance |
Interest Income/ Expense |
Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
$ | 683 | $ | 30 | 4.39 | % | $ | 5,146 | $ | 160 | 3.11 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
| | | 158 | 4 | 2.53 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
27,335 | 1,179 | 4.31 | 22,466 | 846 | 3.77 | ||||||||||||||
Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
60,195 | 4,698 | 7.80 | 41,269 | 2,784 | 6.75 | ||||||||||||||
Tax exempt |
6,536 | 302 | 4.62 | 4,860 | 223 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate |
42,262 | 2,642 | 6.25 | 28,177 | 1,621 | 5.75 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer |
15,801 | 1,160 | 7.34 | 12,839 | 1,013 | 7.89 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(1,001 | ) | (899 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loans |
123,793 | 8,802 | 7.11 | 86,246 | 5,641 | 6.54 | ||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
151,811 | 10,011 | 6.59 | 114,016 | 6,651 | 5.83 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
4,297 | 3,057 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
12,842 | 6,595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 168,950 | $ | 123,668 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand |
$ | 16,797 | $ | | $ | 11,707 | $ | | ||||||||||||
NOW |
11,452 | 64 | 0.56 | 9,514 | 48 | 0.50 | ||||||||||||||
Money market checking |
25,405 | 606 | 2.39 | 25,009 | 397 | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||
Savings |
6,151 | 36 | 0.59 | 6,089 | 36 | 0.59 | ||||||||||||||
IRAs |
5,875 | 238 | 4.05 | 4,731 | 167 | 3.53 | ||||||||||||||
CDs |
54,269 | 2,259 | 4.16 | 38,299 | 1,239 | 3.24 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements and federal funds sold |
19,581 | 698 | 3.56 | 11,029 | 248 | 2.25 | ||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
8,673 | 459 | 5.28 | 3,941 | 191 | 4.85 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
131,406 | 4,360 | 3.32 | 98,612 | 2,326 | 2.36 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
732 | 392 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
148,935 | 110,711 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
1,360 | 954 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in capital |
16,314 | 10,227 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
2,791 | 2,071 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(450 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
20,015 | 12,957 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 168,950 | $ | 123,668 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
3.27 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impact of non-interest bearing funds on margin |
0.45 | 0.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income-margin |
$ | 5,651 | 3.72 | % | $ | 4,325 | 3.79 | % | ||||||||||||
14
Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expense:
(Dollars in thousands) | Volume(1) | 2006 vs. 2005 Increase (Decrease) Due to change in: Rate(1) |
Net | |||||||||
Interest earning assets: |
||||||||||||
Loan portfolio: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 1,477 | $ | 437 | $ | 1,914 | ||||||
Tax exempt |
77 | 2 | 79 | |||||||||
Real Estate |
881 | 140 | 1,021 | |||||||||
Consumer |
217 | (70 | ) | 147 | ||||||||
Net loans |
$ | 2,652 | $ | 509 | $ | 3,161 | ||||||
Investment securities (1) |
210 | 123 | 333 | |||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
(196 | ) | 66 | (130 | ) | |||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 2,666 | $ | 698 | $ | 3,364 | ||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||
NOW |
$ | 11 | $ | 5 | $ | 16 | ||||||
Money market checking |
9 | 201 | 210 | |||||||||
Savings |
| | | |||||||||
IRAs |
46 | 25 | 71 | |||||||||
CDs |
665 | 355 | 1,020 | |||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
305 | 145 | 450 | |||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
250 | 17 | 267 | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 1,286 | $ | 748 | $ | 2,034 | ||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 1,380 | $ | (50 | ) | $ | 1,330 | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Volume(1) | 2005 vs. 2004 Increase (Decrease) Due to change in: Rate(1) |
Net | |||||||||
Interest earning assets: |
||||||||||||
Loan portfolio: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 456 | $ | 90 | $ | 546 | ||||||
Tax exempt |
173 | 4 | 177 | |||||||||
Real Estate |
375 | (69 | ) | 306 | ||||||||
Consumer |
(12 | ) | (43 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||||
Net loans |
$ | 992 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 974 | |||||
Investment securities (1) |
(21 | ) | 50 | 29 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
51 | 58 | 109 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold |
1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 1,023 | $ | 92 | $ | 1,115 | ||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||
NOW |
$ | 10 | $ | | $ | 10 | ||||||
Money market checking |
44 | 134 | 178 | |||||||||
Savings |
6 | | 6 | |||||||||
IRAs |
28 | 13 | 41 | |||||||||
CDs |
151 | 138 | 289 | |||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
71 | 109 | 180 | |||||||||
FHLB borrowings |
(1 | ) | 53 | 52 | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 309 | $ | 447 | $ | 756 | ||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 714 | $ | (355 | ) | $ | 359 | |||||
(1) | The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. |
15
Provision for Loan Losses
MVBs provision for loan losses for 2006 and 2005 were approximately $445,000 and $160,000, respectively. This increase principally relates to the increase in loans outstanding.
Determining the appropriate level of the Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL) requires considerable management judgment. In exercising this judgment, management considers numerous internal and external factors including, but not limited to, portfolio growth, national and local economic conditions, trends in the markets served and guidance from the Banks primary regulators. Management seeks to maintain an ALL that is appropriate in the circumstances and that complies with applicable accounting and regulatory standards. Further discussion can be found later in this discussion under Allowance for Loan Losses.
Non-Interest Income
Fees related to deposit accounts and cash management accounts represent the significant portion of the Banks primary non-interest income. The total of non-interest income for 2006 was $1.2 million versus $876,000 in 2005.
The most significant increase in non-interest income from 2006 to 2005 was $128,000 in fees on loans sold into the secondary market. This increase is mainly the result of increased focus on secondary market loans. Other areas of significant increase in non-interest income were service charges on deposit accounts which increased by $117,000 to $591,000 and Visa debit card income, which increased by 47.8% to $170,000.
Loss on sale of securities during 2006 totaled $4,000 versus $5,000 in 2005. The Bank does not routinely sell securities from the portfolio, however, during 2006, some very small mortgage-backed securities were sold and replaced with higher yielding agencies which were used for repurchase agreements.
The Bank is constantly searching for new non-interest income opportunities that enhance income and provide customer benefits.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest Expense was $5.13 million in 2006 versus $4.28 in 2005. Approximately 56% and 58% of non-interest expense for 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to personnel costs. Personnel is the lifeblood of every service organization, which is why personnel cost is such a significant part of the expenditure mix. This increase in personnel cost from $2.48 million to $2.90 million represents a full year of staffing for the Harrison and Jefferson offices as well as salary adjustments for existing staff.
Data processing comprised approximately 12.3% and 11.8% of total non-interest expense during 2006 and 2005, respectively, growing from $505,000 in 2005 to $633,000 in 2006. This increase is the result of increasing account and transaction volumes from one year to the next, a full years operation of the Harrison and Jefferson County offices and the continued focus on internet banking and bill payment services.
In 2006 occupancy expense increased by 62.7% to $379,000 and equipment depreciation and maintenance increased by 25.5% to $310,000. These increases were a direct result of expansion into the Harrison and Jefferson County markets.
16
2005 compared to 2004
Net interest income increased by $359,000 when comparing 2005 with 2004 results. This increase is largely due to growth in average earning assets, primarily loans, of $16.9 million in 2005. Average interest-bearing liabilities, mainly deposits, increased by $14.4 million in 2005. This increase was due to an increase in average interest-bearing deposits of $11.2 million.
Non-interest income is comprised of fees related to deposit accounts and cash management accounts. Non-interest income was $876,000 in 2005 compared to $677,000 in 2004. This increase was due primarily to increased deposit account activity, the addition of secondary market loan income and interest income on additional bank owned life insurance purchased in 2005.
Non-interest expense reached $4.3 million in 2005 compared to $2.7 million in 2004. This increase is representative of the continued growth in the Harrison and Jefferson county markets.
Income Taxes
MVB incurred income tax expense of $341,000 in 2006 and $195,000 in 2005.
The effective tax rate was 26% in 2005 and 2006.
Return on Assets
MVBs return on average assets was .58% in 2006, .45% in 2005 and 1.04% in 2004. The increased return in 2006 is a direct result of the improving performance of the Harrison and Jefferson offices as they continue to grow and mature. The 2005 results reflect all of the costs of opening the Harrison and Jefferson offices, with less than a full year to realize earnings from the new locations.
Return on Equity
MVBs return on average stockholders equity (ROE) was 4.86% in 2006, compared to 4.34% in 2005 and 12.68% in 2004. The increased return in 2006 is a direct result of the improving performance of the Harrison and Jefferson offices as they continue to grow. As with return on assets, the 2005 results reflect all the costs of opening the new offices with less than a full year to realize earnings from those offices. MVB also added $9 million in capital in 2005, which in addition to reduced earnings, had a significant negative impact on return on equity.
Overview of the Statement of Condition
The MVB balance sheet changed significantly from 2005 to 2006. Loans increased by $37.4 million to $142.6 million at December 31, 2006. This increase was largely due to growth in Harrison County, where $27.4 million in new loans were added to the portfolio. Bank premises, furniture and equipment increased by $867,000 as MVB has begun construction of a new facility in Berkeley County, West Virginia. Additionally, loans held for sale increased by $1.3 million and other assets increased by $807,000, $558,000 of which was FHLB stock. Deposits increased by $20.6 million, $9.8 million relating to Harrison County and $1.7 million relating to Jefferson County. Repurchase agreements increased by $4.9 million, $4.4 million relating to Harrison County. FHLB borrowings increased by $10.8 million, much of which was used to fund loan growth. Finally, stockholders equity increased by $3.1 million, $2.1 million of which represented the completion of an $11.6 million public offering began in 2005 and $973,000 in 2006 earnings. These areas of growth are in large part the direct result of growth in the Harrison and Jefferson county markets, in addition to the continued success of MVB in the Marion County market.
17
Cash and Cash Equivalents
MVBs cash and cash equivalents totaled $6.4 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $3.1 million at December 31, 2005, an increase of $3.3 million, $2.9 million of which represents an increase in the cash letter on the final day of the year.
Management believes the current balance of cash and cash equivalents adequately serves MVBs liquidity and performance needs. Total cash and cash equivalents fluctuate on a daily basis due to transactions in process and other liquidity demands. Management believes the liquidity needs of MVB are satisfied by the current balance of cash and cash equivalents, readily available access to traditional and non-traditional funding sources, and the portions of the investment and loan portfolios that mature within one year. These sources of funds should enable MVB to meet cash obligations as they come due.
Investment Securities
Investment securities totaled $28.7 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $28.5 million at December 31, 2005.
MVBs investment securities are primarily classified as available-for-sale. Management believes the available-for-sale classification provides flexibility for MVB in terms of managing the portfolio for liquidity, yield enhancement and interest rate risk management opportunities. At December 31, 2006, the amortized cost of MVBs investment securities totaled $29.1 million, resulting in unrealized depreciation in the investment portfolio of $378,000.
Management monitors the earnings performance and liquidity of the investment portfolio on a regular basis through Investment/Asset and Liability Committee (IALC) meetings. The IALC also monitors net interest income and manages interest rate risk for MVB. Through active balance sheet management and analysis of the investment securities portfolio, MVB maintains sufficient liquidity to satisfy depositor requirements and the various credit needs of its customers. Management believes the risk characteristics inherent in the investment portfolio are acceptable based on these parameters.
Loans
MVBs lending is primarily focused in Marion, Harrison and Jefferson County, West Virginia with a secondary focus on the adjacent counties in West Virginia. The portfolio consists principally of commercial lending, retail lending, which includes single-family residential mortgages and consumer lending. Loans totaled $142.6 million as of December 31, 2006, compared to $105.2 million at December 31, 2005.
During 2006, MVB experienced loan growth of $27.4 million in Harrison County and $9.8 million in Jefferson County. The most significant portion of the growth came in the commercial and non-residential real estate area. Commercial and non-residential real estate loans grew approximately $24.1 million, while adjustable rate residential real estate loans grew $15.2 million.
At December 31, 2006, commercial loans represented the largest portion of the portfolio approximating 58.3% of the total loan portfolio. Commercial loans totaled $83.1 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $59.0 million at December 31, 2005. Management will continue to focus on the enhancement and growth of the commercial loan portfolio while maintaining appropriate underwriting standards and risk/price balance. Management expects commercial loan demand to continue to be strong in 2007.
18
Residential real estate loans to MVBs retail customers (including home equity lines of credit) account for the second largest portion of the loan portfolio, comprising 33.7% of MVBs total loan portfolio. Residential real estate loans totaled $48.1 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $32.9 million at December 31, 2005. Included in residential real estate loans are home equity credit lines totaling $10.7 million at December 31,2006, compared to $4.5 million at December 31, 2005. Management believes the home equity loans are competitive products with an acceptable return on investment after risk considerations. Residential real estate lending continues to represent a primary focus of MVBs lending due to the lower risk factors associated with this type of loan and the opportunity to provide service to those in the Marion, Harrison and Jefferson County markets.
Consumer lending continues to be a part of MVBs core lending. At December 31, 2006, consumer loan balances totaled $11.4 million compared to $13.3 million at December 31, 2005. The majority of MVBs consumer loans are in the direct lending area. Management is pleased with the performance and quality of the consumer loan portfolio, which can be attributed to the many years of experience of its consumer lenders. This is another important product necessary to serve MVBs market areas.
19
The following table provides additional information about MVBs loans:
Loan maturities at December 31, 2006:
(Dollars in Thousands) | One Year or Less |
Thru Five |
Due After Five Years |
Total | ||||||||
Commercial and nonresidential real estate |
$ | 13,967 | $ | 35,444 | $ | 33,713 | $ | 83,124 | ||||
Residential real estate |
2,788 | 6,133 | 39,144 | 48,065 | ||||||||
Consumer and other |
3,574 | 7,645 | 191 | 11,410 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,329 | $ | 49,222 | $ | 73,048 | $ | 142,599 | ||||
The preceding data has been compiled based upon the earlier of either contractual maturity or next repricing date
Loan Portfolio Analysis:
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Year-end balances: |
||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
83,124 | 59,052 | ||
Real estate |
48,065 | 32,903 | ||
Consumer |
11,410 | 13,259 | ||
Total |
142,599 | 105,214 | ||
Loan Concentration
At December 31, 2006, commercial loans comprised the largest component of the loan portfolio. There are very few commercial loans that are not secured by real estate. Such non-real estate secured loans generally are lines of credit secured by accounts receivable. While the loan concentration is in commercial loans, the commercial portfolio is comprised of loans to many different borrowers, in numerous different industries but primarily located in our market areas.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Management continually monitors the risk in the loan portfolio through review of the monthly delinquency reports and the Loan Review Committee. The Loan Review Committee is responsible for the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. This analysis involves both experience of the portfolio to date and the makeup of the overall portfolio. Specific loss estimates are derived for individual loans based on specific criteria such as current delinquent status, related deposit account activity, where applicable, local market rumors, which are generally based on some factual information, and changes in the local and national economy. While local market rumors are not measurable or perhaps not readily supportable, historically, this form of information has been a valuable indication of a potential problem.
20
The result of the evaluation of the adequacy at each period presented herein indicated that the allowance for loan losses was considered adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
At December 31, 2006, MVB had non-accrual loans totaling $5,000 versus $81,000 as of this same date in 2005. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, MVB had impaired loans totaling $5,000 and $116,000, respectively. A portion of the Allowance for Loan Losses was allocated to cover any loss in these loans. Loans past due more than 30 days were $2,276,000 and $1,157,000, respectively at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Excluded from the 2005 numbers is a $1.3 million USDA 80% secured loan. This loan was paid off in the first quarter of 2006 through the liquidation of collateral consisting of machinery and equipment.
December 31 | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||
Loans past due more than 30 days to gross loans |
1.59 | % | 1.10 | % | ||
Loans past due more than 90 days to gross loans |
.03 | % | .03 | % |
MVB incurred net charge-offs of $112,000 in 2006 and $178,000 in 2005. MVBs provision for loan losses was $445,000 in 2006 and $160,000 in 2005. Net charge-offs represented .09% and .20% in 2006 and 2005, respectively, compared to average outstanding loans for the indicated period.
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Balance, January 1 |
$ | 873 | $ | 891 | ||||
Provision |
445 | 160 | ||||||
Charge-offs |
119 | 187 | ||||||
Recoveries |
(7 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Net charge-offs |
112 | 178 | ||||||
Balance, December 31 |
$ | 1,206 | $ | 873 | ||||
The following table reflects the allocation of the allowance for loan losses as of December 31:
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Allocation of allowance for loan losses at December 31: |
||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 482 | $ | 349 | ||||
Real estate |
362 | 184 | ||||||
Consumer |
362 | 340 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,206 | $ | 873 | ||||
Percent of loans to total loans at December 31: |
||||||||
Commercial |
58 | % | 56 | % | ||||
Real estate |
34 | 31 | ||||||
Consumer |
8 | 13 | ||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
21
Non-performing assets consist of loans that are no longer accruing interest, loans that have been renegotiated to below market rates based upon financial difficulties of the borrower, and real estate acquired through foreclosure. When interest accruals are suspended, accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to earnings and prior year amounts generally charged off as a credit loss. When, in managements judgment, the borrowers ability to make periodic interest and principal payments resumes and collectibility is no longer in doubt, the loan is returned to accrual status.
Non-performing assets and past due loans:
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Non-accrual loans |
||||||||
Commercial |
$ | | $ | 35 | ||||
Real estate |
| | ||||||
Consumer |
5 | 81 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
5 | 116 | ||||||
Renegotiated loans |
| | ||||||
Total non-performing loans |
5 | 116 | ||||||
Other real estate, net |
| | ||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 5 | $ | 116 | ||||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
| | ||||||
Non-performing loans as a % of total loans |
.00 | % | .11 | % | ||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of non-performing loans |
24,120 | % | 753 | % |
Funding Sources
MVB considers a number of alternatives, including but not limited to deposits, short-term borrowings, and long-term borrowings when evaluating funding sources. Traditional deposits continue to be the most significant source of funds for MVB, totaling $134.6 million, or 79.8% of MVBs funding sources at December 31, 2006. This same information at December 31, 2005 reflected $114.0 million in deposits representing 86.1% of such funding sources. Cash management accounts, which are available to large corporate customers represented 12.0% and 11.6% of MVBs funding sources at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh for specific purposes represented the remainder of such funding sources.
Management continues to emphasize the development of additional non-interest-bearing deposits as a core funding source for MVB. At December 31, 2006, non-interest-bearing balances totaled $19.8 million compared to $13.5 million at December 31, 2005 or 14.7% and 11.9% of total deposits respectively.
Interest-bearing deposits totaled $114.8 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $100.4 million at December 31, 2005. On a percentage basis, Certificates of Deposits compose the largest component of MVBs deposits. Average interest-bearing liabilities totaled $131.4 million during 2006 compared to $98.6 million during 2005. Average non-interest bearing liabilities totaled $17.5 million during 2006 compared to $12.0 million during 2005. Management will continue to emphasize deposit gathering in 2007 by offering outstanding customer service and competitively priced products.
22
Maturities of Certificates of Deposit $100,000 or more:
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2006 | ||
Under 3 months Over 3-6 months |
$ |
1,502 8,691 | |
Over 6 to 12 months |
11,278 | ||
Over 12 months |
7,195 | ||
Total |
$ | 28,666 | |
There are no other time deposits of $100,000 or more.
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and repurchase agreements:
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 33,999 | 18,311 | |||||
Average balance |
28,254 | 14,970 | ||||||
Highest month-end balance |
35,946 | $ | 18,311 | |||||
Interest expense |
1,157 | 439 | ||||||
Weighted average interest rate: |
||||||||
End of Year |
4.36 | % | 3.24 | % | ||||
During the Year |
4.09 | % | 2.93 | % |
Along with traditional deposits, MVB has access to both overnight repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings to fund its operations and investments. MVBs repurchase agreements totaled $20.2 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $15.3 million in 2005. Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings totaled $13.8 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $3.0 million at year-end 2005.
Capital/Stockholders Equity
During the year ended December 31, 2006, stockholders equity increased approximately $3.1 million to $21.6 million. This increase consists of $2.1 million raised through the completion of a public stock offering begun in 2005 and MVBs net income for the year of $973,000. MVB paid no dividends during 2006 or 2005.
At December 31, 2006, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaled ($373,000), a decrease in the loss of $70,000 from December 31, 2005. This principally represents net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes, and the adjustment to initially apply FASB statement No. 158, net of income taxes, at December 31, 2006. Because the vast majority of all the investment securities in MVBs portfolio are classified as available-for-sale, both the investment and equity sections of MVBs balance sheet are more sensitive to the changing market values of investments than those institutions that classify more of their investment portfolio as held to maturity. Interest rate fluctuations between year-end 2006 and 2005 resulted in the change in market value of the portfolio.
MVB has also complied with the standards of capital adequacy mandated by the banking industry. Bank regulators have established risk-based capital requirements designed to measure capital adequacy. Risk-based capital ratios reflect the relative risks of various assets banks hold in their portfolios. A weight category of either 0% (lowest risk assets), 20%, 50%, or 100% (highest risk assets) is assigned to each asset on the balance sheet. Detailed information concerning MVBs risk-based capital ratios can be found in Note 14 of the Notes to the Audited Financial Statements. At December 31, 2006, MVBs risk-based capital ratios were above the minimum standards for a well-capitalized institution. MVBs risk-based capital ratio of 15.2% at December 31, 2006, is above the well-capitalized standard of 10%. MVBs Tier 1 capital ratio of 14.4% also exceeded the
23
well-capitalized minimum of 6%. The leverage ratio at December 31, 2006, was 11.4% and was also above the well-capitalized standard of 5%. Management believes MVBs capital continues to provide a strong base for profitable growth.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity
The objective of MVBs asset/liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within its policy guidelines. This objective is accomplished through management of MVBs balance sheet liquidity and interest rate risk exposure based on changes in economic conditions, interest rate levels, and customer preferences.
Interest Rate Risk
The most significant market risk resulting from MVBs normal course of business, extending loans and accepting deposits, is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the potential for economic loss due to future interest rate changes which can impact both the earnings stream as well as market values of financial assets and liabilities. MVBs Investment/ Asset/ Liability Committee (IALC) is responsible for the overall review and management of the Banks balance sheets related to the management of interest rate risk. The IALC strives to keep MVB focused on the future, anticipating and exploring alternatives, rather than simply reacting to change after the fact.
To this end, the IALC has established an interest risk management policy that sets the minimum requirements and guidelines for monitoring and controlling the level and amount of interest rate risk. The objective of the interest rate risk policy is to encourage management to adhere to sound fundamentals of banking while allowing sufficient flexibility to exercise the creativity and innovations necessary to meet the challenges of changing markets. The ultimate goal of these policies is to optimize net interest income within the constraints of prudent capital adequacy, liquidity, and safety.
The IALC relies on different methods of assessing interest rate risk including simulating net interest income, monitoring the sensitivity of the net present market value of equity or economic value of equity, and monitoring the difference or gap between maturing or rate-sensitive assets and liabilities over various time periods. The IALC places emphasis on simulation modeling as the most beneficial measurement of interest rate risk due to its dynamic measure. By employing a simulation process that measures the impact of potential changes in interest rates and balance sheet structures, and by establishing limits on changes in net income and net market value, the IALC is better able to evaluate the possible risks associated with alternative strategies.
The simulation process starts with a base case simulation which represents projections of current balance sheet growth trends. Base case simulation results are prepared under a flat interest rate forecast and what is perceived to be the most likely alternative interest rate forecast. Comparisons showing the earnings variance from the flat rate forecast illustrate the risks associated with the current balance sheet strategy. If necessary, additional balance sheet strategies are developed and simulations prepared. The results from model simulations are reviewed for indications of whether current interest rate risk strategies are accomplishing their goal and, if not, what alternative strategies should be considered. The policy calls for periodic review by the IALC of assumptions used in the modeling.
The IALC believes that it is beneficial to monitor interest rate risk for both the short-and long-term. Therefore, to effectively evaluate results from model simulations, limits on changes in net interest income and the value of the balance sheet have been established. The IALC has determined that the earnings at risk of the Bank shall not change more than 10 % from the base case for a 1% shift in interest rates, nor more than 15 % from the base case for a 2% shift in interest rates. MVB is in compliance with this policy as of December 31, 2006.
24
The following table is provided to show the earnings at risk of MVB as of December 31, 2006.
(Dollars in Thousands) Immediate Interest Rate Change (one year time frame) (in Basis Points) |
Estimated Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income December 31, 2006 |
|||||
Amount | Percent | |||||
+200 |
$ | 7,245 | 10.2 | % | ||
+100 |
6,909 | 5.1 | % | |||
Base rate |
6,572 | |||||
-100 |
6,270 | -4.6 | % | |||
-200* |
$ | 5,825 | -11.4 | % |
Liquidity
Maintenance of a sufficient level of liquidity is a primary objective of the IALC. Liquidity, as defined by the IALC, is the ability to meet anticipated operating cash needs, loan demand, and deposit withdrawals, without incurring a sustained negative impact on net interest income. It is MVBs policy to manage liquidity so that there is no need to make unplanned sales of assets or to borrow funds under emergency conditions.
The main source of liquidity for MVB comes through deposit growth. Liquidity is also provided from cash generated from investment maturities, principal payments from loans, and income from loans and investment securities. During the year ended December 31, 2006, cash provided by financing activities totaled $38.4 million, while outflows from investing activity totaled $35.0 million. When appropriate, MVB has the ability to take advantage of external sources of funds such as advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and national market certificate of deposit issuance programs. These external sources often provide attractive interest rates and flexible maturity dates that enable MVB to match funding with contractual maturity dates of assets. Securities in the investment portfolio are primarily classified as available-for-sale and can be utilized as an additional source of liquidity.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
MVB has entered into certain agreements that represent off-balance sheet arrangements that could have a significant impact on MVBs financial statements and could have a significant impact in future periods. Specifically, MVB has entered into agreements to extend credit or provide conditional payments pursuant to standby and commercial letters of credit. Further discussion of these agreements, including the amounts outstanding at December 31, 2006, is included in Note 7 to the financial statements.
The following table details the amounts and expected maturities of significant commitments as of December 31, 2006.
25
(Dollars in thousands) |
One Year Or Less |
One To Three |
Three To Five Years |
Over Five Years |
Total | ||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit: |
|||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 5,892 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 144 | $ | 8,130 | $ | 15,799 | |||||
Residential real estate |
1,507 | | | 166 | 1,673 | ||||||||||
Revolving home equity lines |
| 298 | 461 | 10,377 | 11,136 | ||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
231 | | 169 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||
Other commitments |
594 | | | 594 | 594 |
Commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
Fourth Quarter
MVBs fourth quarter net income was $325,000 in 2006 compared to $137,000 in the fourth quarter of 2005. This equated to basic earnings per share, on a quarterly basis, of $.23 in 2006 and $.13 in 2005. Diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2006 and 2005 was $.22 and $.12, respectively. Net interest income increased in each quarter during 2006 and was $1.54 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to $1.18 million in 2005. Non-interest income was $357,000 in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to $316,000 in 2005. Non-interest expense increased to $1.30 million for the fourth quarter of 2006 from $1.29 million in 2005.
Future Outlook
The Banks results of operations in 2006 were very nearly back to the levels prior to the opening of a new office in Harrison County and the purchase of an existing office in Jefferson County during 2005. These results support managements belief that the new markets will make more opportunities available to MVB in the future years. Due to continued customer acceptance of our customer service commitment, MVB has become a strong competitor in the Marion and Harrison County markets. MVB will strive to continue penetrating its markets with an emphasis on customer service with the highest quality products and technology.
Future plans for the Bank involve the Bank taking advantage of both technology and personal customer contact. The Bank continues to expand delivery channels to better serve both retail and business banking customers. In addition to top of the line technology, the Bank is committed to providing individual and personal banking services. MVB will continue to search for quality banking locations as well as exploring alternative delivery systems.
26
ITEM 7. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
MVB Financial Corp.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except number of shares)
December 31, 2006 and 2005
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 6,417 | $ | 3,130 | ||||
Interest bearing balances with banks |
53 | 3,614 | ||||||
Investment Securities: |
||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity, at cost |
2,326 | 3,608 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale, at approximate market value |
26,413 | 24,926 | ||||||
Loans: |
142,599 | 105,214 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
(1,206 | ) | (873 | ) | ||||
Net Loans |
141,393 | 104,341 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,293 | | ||||||
Bank premises, furniture and equipment |
6,493 | 5,626 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
6,896 | 6,089 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 191,284 | $ | 151,334 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
$ | 19,758 | $ | 13,521 | ||||
Interest bearing |
114,835 | 100,432 | ||||||
Total Deposits |
134,593 | 113,953 | ||||||
Accrued interest, taxes, and other liabilities |
1,037 | 552 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements |
20,209 | 15,309 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
13,790 | 3,002 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
169,629 | 132,816 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $1,000; 5,000 shares authorized, none issued |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $1; 4,000,000 shares authorized; 1,467,849 and 1,336,517 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
1,468 | 1,336 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
17,720 | 15,750 | ||||||
Treasury Stock |
(18 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
2,858 | 1,885 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(373 | ) | (443 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
21,655 | 18,518 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 191,284 | $ | 151,334 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
27
MVB Financial Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands except Share and Per Share Data)
Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
INTEREST INCOME |
||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 8,500 | $ | 5,418 | ||||
Interest on deposits with other banks |
30 | 164 | ||||||
Interest on investment securitiestaxable |
1,151 | 820 | ||||||
Interest on tax exempt loans and securities |
330 | 249 | ||||||
Total interest income |
10,011 | 6,651 | ||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
3,203 | 1,886 | ||||||
Interest on repurchase agreements |
698 | 249 | ||||||
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
459 | 191 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
4,360 | 2,326 | ||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
5,651 | 4,325 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
445 | 160 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
5,206 | 4,165 | ||||||
OTHER INCOME |
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
591 | 474 | ||||||
Income on bank owned life insurance |
149 | 101 | ||||||
Visa debit card income |
170 | 115 | ||||||
Income on loans held for sale |
246 | 118 | ||||||
Other operating income |
88 | 73 | ||||||
Loss on sale of securities |
(4 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
1,240 | 876 | |||||||
OTHER EXPENSES |
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
2,897 | 2,485 | ||||||
Occupancy expense |
379 | 233 | ||||||
Equipment depreciation and maintenance |
310 | 247 | ||||||
Data processing |
633 | 505 | ||||||
Visa debit card expense |
116 | 85 | ||||||
Advertising |
112 | 93 | ||||||
Legal and accounting fees |
87 | 56 | ||||||
Printing, stationery and supplies |
85 | 94 | ||||||
Other taxes |
97 | 85 | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
416 | 401 | ||||||
5,132 | 4,284 | |||||||
Income before income taxes |
1,314 | 757 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
341 | 195 | ||||||
Net Income |
$ | 973 | $ | 562 | ||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.68 | $ | 0.57 | ||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.67 | $ | 0.56 | ||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
1,427,985 | 993,022 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
1,442,910 | 1,008,033 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
28
MVB Financial Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 973 | $ | 562 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
445 | 160 | ||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit)/expense |
(61 | ) | 37 | |||||
Depreciation |
310 | 189 | ||||||
Loans originated for sale |
(14,924 | ) | (8,437 | ) | ||||
Proceeds of loans sold |
13,631 | 8,437 | ||||||
Amortization, net of accretion |
31 | 83 | ||||||
(Increase) in interest receivable and other assets |
(984 | ) | (792 | ) | ||||
Increase in accrued interest, taxes, and other liabilities |
483 | 168 | ||||||
NET CASH (USED IN)/PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(96 | ) | 407 | |||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
(Increase) in loans made to customers |
(37,497 | ) | (26,541 | ) | ||||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
(1,177 | ) | (2,525 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale |
(8,386 | ) | (10,441 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investment securities held-to-maturity |
| (2,200 | ) | |||||
Decrease/(increase) in deposits with Federal Home Loan Bank, net |
2,670 | (2,418 | ) | |||||
Purchases of certificates of deposit with other banks |
(594 | ) | (3,069 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturity of certificates of deposit with other banks |
1,485 | 3,763 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales, maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale |
8,251 | 3,976 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity |
209 | 40 | ||||||
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
| (2,000 | ) | |||||
Net cash acquired from branch purchase |
| 14,472 | ||||||
NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(35,039 | ) | (26,943 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
20,640 | 11,372 | ||||||
Net increase in repurchase agreements |
4,900 | 7,811 | ||||||
Net increase/(decrease) in Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
10,788 | (1,037 | ) | |||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(8 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds of stock offering |
2,102 | 9,368 | ||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
38,422 | 27,513 | ||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
3,287 | 977 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3,130 | 2,153 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 6,417 | $ | 3,130 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash payments for: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits, repurchase agreements and FHLB borrowings |
$ | 4,249 | $ | 2,172 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 340 | $ | 659 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
29
MVB Financial Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
Common Stock |
Surplus | Retained Earnings (Deficit) |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(loss) |
Treasury Stock |
Total Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
$ | 743 | $ | 6,975 | $ | 1,323 | $ | (189 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 8,843 | |||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
562 | 562 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income(loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net fair value adjustment on securities available for sale, less reclassification adjustment for realized gains - net of tax effect of $156 |
(234 | ) | (234 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment - net of tax effect |
(20 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
308 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock offering |
593 | 8,775 | 9,368 | ||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock, acquired at cost |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
$ | 1,336 | $ | 15,750 | $ | 1,885 | $ | (443 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 18,518 | |||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
973 | 973 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income(loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net fair value adjustment on securities available for sale, less reclassification adjustment for realized gains - net of tax effect of $(123) |
185 | 185 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
1,158 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to initially apply FASB |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statement No. 158, net of tax |
(115 | ) | (115 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Stock offering |
132 | 1,970 | 2,102 | ||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock, acquired at cost |
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
$ | 1,468 | $ | 17,720 | $ | 2,858 | $ | (373 | ) | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 21,655 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
30
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
Note 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Operations
MVB Financial Corp., the Company, provides banking services to the domestic market with the primary market areas being the Marion, Jefferson, and Harrison counties of West Virginia. To a large extent, the operations of the Company, such as loan portfolio management and deposit growth, are directly affected by the market area economies.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MVB Financial Corp. Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates, such as the allowance for loan losses, are based upon known facts and circumstances. Estimates are revised by management in the period such facts and circumstances change. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Investment Securities
Debt securities that management has the ability and intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discounts computed by the interest method from purchase date to maturity. Other marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, net of the deferred income tax effect, are recognized as direct increases or decreases in stockholders equity. Cost of securities sold is recognized using the specific identification method.
Loans Held for Sale
Through Freddie Mac and InterFirst, MVB Bank, Inc. has the ability to offer customers long-term fixed rate mortgage products without holding these instruments in the banks loan portfolio. After thorough review of the contracts with Freddie Mac and InterFirst, the Company has concluded that no material derivative instruments exist.
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal reduced by an allowance for loan losses. Loans are considered delinquent when scheduled principal or interest payments are 31 days past due. Interest income on loans is recognized on an accrual basis. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level deemed adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company consistently applies a quarterly loan review process to continually evaluate loans for changes in credit risk. This process serves as the primary means by which the Company evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, and is based upon periodic review of the collectibility of loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as substandard or special mention. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based upon historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.
A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and shortages generally are not classified as impaired. Generally the Company considers impaired loans to include loans classified as non-accrual loans and loans past due for longer than 90 days.
31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
Loan Origination Fees and Costs
Loan origination fees and costs are accounted for according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 91, which requires that loan origination and commitment fees and direct loan origination costs be deferred and the net amount amortized as an adjustment of the related loans yield.
Bank Premises, Furniture and Equipment
Bank premises, furniture and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The provision for depreciation is computed for financial reporting by the straight-line-method based on the estimated useful lives of assets, which range from 7 to 40 years on buildings and leasehold improvements and 3 to 10 years on furniture, fixtures and equipment.
Intangible Assets
The excess of the cost of an acquired company over the fair value of the net assets and identified intangibles acquired is recorded as goodwill. The net carrying amount of intangible assets was $995 at December 31, 2006.
Other Investments
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock is recorded at cost and considered to be restricted as the Company is required by the FHLB to hold this investment, and the only market for this stock is the issuing agency. FHLB stock totaled $851 and $293 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and is included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheet.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are reported for timing differences between items of income or expense reported in the financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes. The differences relate principally to accretion of discounts on investment securities, provision for loan losses, minimum pension liability, and differences between book and tax methods of depreciation.
Stock Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123R) which was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in December 2004. SFAS No. 123R revises SFAS 123 Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and supercedes APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB No. 25) and its related interpretations. Under SFAS No. 123R, the Company is required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for any unvested options previously granted. All outstanding options of the Company were fully vested as of December 31, 2005, and only late in 2006 did the Company grant a small number of options for which compensation expense of less than $1 has been recognized.
At December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation using the accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company was not required to adopt the fair value based recognition provisions prescribed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, but complied with the disclosure requirements set forth in SFAS No. 148, which included disclosing pro forma net income as if the fair value based method of accounting had been applied. This information for the year ended December 31, 2005 is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands, except Per Share Data) | Year Ended December 2005 |
|||
Net income as reported |
$ | 562 | ||
Stock based compensation, net of tax using fair value method |
(395 | ) | ||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 167 | ||
Basic earnings per share as reported |
$ | 0.57 | ||
Diluted earnings per share as reported |
$ | 0.56 | ||
Proforma basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.17 | ||
Proforma diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.17 |
32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
Foreclosed Assets Held for Resale
Foreclosed assets held for resale acquired in satisfaction of mortgage obligations and in foreclosure proceedings are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of foreclosure, with any valuation adjustments charged to the allowance for loan losses. Any unrealized gains or losses on sale are then recorded in other non-interest expense. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company held other real estate of $0 and $40.
Net Income Per Common Share
Diluted net income per common share includes any dilutive effects of stock options, and is computed by dividing net income by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of options under The Companys 2003 Stock Incentive Plan.
Comprehensive Income
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and minimum pension liability, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 2005 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 financial statement presentation.
NOTE 2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Amortized cost and approximate market values of investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2006, including gross unrealized gains and losses, are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain |
Unrealized Loss |
Approximate Market Value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Municipal securities |
826 | 2 | (5 | ) | 823 | ||||||||
U. S. Agency securities |
1,500 | | (7 | ) | 1,493 | ||||||||
$ | 2,326 | $ | 2 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 2,316 | |||||
Amortized cost and approximate market values of investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2005, including gross unrealized gains and losses, are summarized as follows:
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain |
Unrealized Loss |
Approximate Market Value | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 69 | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | 71 | |||||
Municipal securities |
838 | 1 | (9 | ) | 830 | ||||||||
U. S. Agency securities |
2,701 | | (11 | ) | 2,690 | ||||||||
$ | 3,608 | $ | 3 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 3,591 | |||||
33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
Amortized cost and approximate market values of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows:
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain |
Unrealized Loss |
Approximate Market Value | ||||||||||
U. S. Agency securities |
$ | 20,869 | $ | 34 | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 20,758 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
4,667 | | (159 | ) | 4,508 | ||||||||
Corporate securities |
1,255 | 2 | (110 | ) | 1,147 | ||||||||
$ | 26,791 | $ | 36 | $ | (414 | ) | $ | 26,413 | |||||
Amortized cost and approximate market values of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2005 are summarized as follows:
Amortized Cost |
Unrealized Gain |
Unrealized Loss |
Approximate Market Value | ||||||||||
U. S. Agency securities |
$ | 17,999 | $ | | $ | (275 | ) | $ | 17,724 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
6,096 | 3 | (202 | ) | 5,897 | ||||||||
Corporate securities |
1,517 | | (212 | ) | 1,305 | ||||||||
$ | 25,612 | $ | 3 | $ | (689 | ) | $ | 24,926 |
The following tables summarize amortized cost and approximate market values of securities by maturity:
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Held to Maturity | Available for sale | |||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Approximate Market Value |
Amortized Cost |
Approximate Market Value | |||||||||
Within one year |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 999 | $ | 2,358 | $ | 2,349 | ||||
After one year, but within five |
| | 13,874 | 13,672 | ||||||||
After five years, but within ten |
988 | 983 | 8,624 | 8,594 | ||||||||
After ten Years |
338 | 334 | 1,935 | 1,798 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,326 | $ | 2,316 | $ | 26,791 | $ | 26,413 | ||||
Investment securities with a carrying value of $20,904 and $16,254 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds and repurchase agreements.
The Companys investment portfolio includes securities that are in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2006, the details of which are included in the following table. Although these securities, if sold at December 31, 2006 would result in a pretax loss of $426, the Company has no intent to sell the applicable securities at such market values, and maintains the Company has the ability to hold these securities until all principal has been recovered. Declines in the market values of these securities can be traced to general market conditions which reflect the prospect for the economy as a whole. When determining other-than-temporary impairment on securities, the Company considers such factors as adverse conditions specifically related to a certain security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area, the time frame securities have been in an unrealized loss position, the Companys ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in value, whether or not the security has been downgraded by a rating agency, and whether or not the financial condition of the security issuer has severely deteriorated. As of December 31, 2006, the Company considers all securities with unrealized loss positions to be temporarily impaired, and consequently, does not believe the Company will sustain any material realized losses as a result of the current temporary decline in market value.
34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
The following table discloses investments in an unrealized loss position:
At December 31, 2006, total temporary impairment totaled $426.
Description and number of positions |
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | |||||||||||
U.S. Agencies (33) |
$ | 2,309 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 14,256 | $ | (150 | ) | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities (33) |
| | 4,508 | (159 | ) | |||||||||
Corporate securities (3) |
| | 845 | (110 | ) | |||||||||
Municipal securities (2) |
285 | (1 | ) | 229 | (4 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 2,594 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 19,838 | $ | (423 | ) | |||||
NOTE 3. LOANS
The components of loans in the balance sheet at December 31, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Commercial and non-residential real estate |
$ | 83,124 | $ | 59,052 | ||
Residential real estate |
48,065 | 32,903 | ||||
Consumer and other |
11,410 | 13,259 | ||||
$ | 142,599 | $ | 105,214 | |||
Changes in the allowance for possible loan losses were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 873 | $ | 891 | ||||
Losses charged to allowance |
(119 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||
Recoveries credited to allowance |
7 | 9 | ||||||
Provision for possible loan losses |
445 | 160 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 1,206 | $ | 873 | ||||
Impaired loans are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of Loans, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 118. The Company considers a loan impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had non-accrual loans totaling $5 and $81, respectively.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had impaired loans totaling $5 and $116, respectively, with an allocated reserve for such loans sufficient to cover possible losses.
NOTE 4. BANK PREMISES, FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT
Bank premises, furniture and equipment at December 31, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Bank Premises |
$ | 5,853 | $ | 4,732 | ||||
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
1,791 | 1,745 | ||||||
7,644 | 6,477 | |||||||
Allowance for depreciation |
(1,151 | ) | (851 | ) | ||||
$ | 6,493 | $ | 5,626 | |||||
35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
NOTE 5. DEPOSITS
Deposits at December 31, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Demand deposits of individuals, partnerships, and corporations |
||||||
Interest bearing |
$ | 12,667 | $ | 10,192 | ||
Non-interest bearing |
18,783 | 12,825 | ||||
Time and savings deposits of individuals, partnerships and corporations 97,624 |
89,505 | |||||
Deposits of states and political subdivisions |
4,544 | 735 | ||||
Official checks |
975 | 696 | ||||
Total Domestic Deposits |
$ | 134,593 | $ | 113,953 | ||
Time deposits of over $100 included above |
$ | 28,666 | $ | 21,141 | ||
Maturities of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2006 were as follows:
2007 |
$ | 48,227 | |
2008 |
9,766 | ||
2009 |
2,071 | ||
2010 |
2,900 | ||
2011 |
2,289 | ||
Total |
$ | 65,253 | |
NOTE 6. BORROWED FUNDS
The Company is a party to repurchase agreements with certain customers. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the company had repurchase agreements of $20,209 and $15,309.
MVB Bank, Inc. (the Bank) is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The remaining maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB at December 31, 2006 was approximately $48,458. At December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Bank had borrowed $13,790 and $3,002.
Borrowings from the FHLB as of December 31 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Fixed interest rate note, originating April 1999, due April 2014, interest of 5.405% is payable monthly |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||
Fixed interest rate note, originating January 2005, due January 2020, payable in monthly installments of $11, including interest of 5.140% |
1,225 | 1,289 | ||||
Fixed interest rate note, originating April 2002, due May 2017, payable in monthly installments of $4, including interest of 5.90% |
701 | 713 | ||||
Floating interest rate note, originating March 2003, due December 2011, interest payable monthly, including interest of 5.43% |
8,216 | | ||||
Fixed interest rate note, originating July 2006, due July 2016, payable in monthly installments of $8, including interest of 4.50% |
1,487 | | ||||
Fixed interest rate note, originating October 2006, due October 2021, payable in monthly installments of $6, including interest of 5.20% |
1,161 | | ||||
$ | 13,790 | $ | 3,002 | |||
36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
A summary of maturities of these borrowings over the next five years is as follows:
Year |
Amount | ||
2007 |
$ | 130 | |
2008 |
137 | ||
2009 |
144 | ||
2010 |
152 | ||
2011 |
8,376 | ||
Thereafter |
4,851 | ||
$ | 13,790 | ||
Borrowings from the FHLB are secured by stock in the FHLB of Pittsburgh, qualifying first mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and certain investment securities.
Additionally the Bank has a line of credit of $4,500 available from the Bankers Bank of Atlanta. There were no borrowings against this line of credit at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
NOTE 7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the statements of financial condition.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customers credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount and type of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, varies and is based on managements credit evaluation of the customer.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Companys policy for obtaining collateral, and the nature of such collateral, is essentially the same as that involved in making commitments to extend credit.
Total contractual amounts of the commitments as of December 31 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Available on lines of credit |
$ | 20,939 | $ | 20,553 | ||
Stand-by letters of credit |
400 | 233 | ||||
Other loan commitments |
594 | 503 | ||||
$ | 21,933 | $ | 21,289 | |||
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company grants a majority of its commercial, financial, agricultural, real estate and installment loans to customers throughout Marion and Harrison County areas of West Virginia and adjacent counties. Collateral for loans is primarily residential and commercial real estate, personal property, and business equipment. The Company evaluates the credit worthiness of each of its customers on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral it obtains is based upon managements credit evaluation.
37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
The Company records income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (FAS 109), Accounting for Income Taxes. FASB 109 is an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of other assets and liabilities.
The amount reflected as income taxes represents federal and state income taxes on financial statement income. Certain items of income and expense, primarily the provision for possible loan losses, allowance for losses on foreclosed assets held for resale, depreciation, and accretion of discounts on investment securities are reported in different accounting periods for income tax purposes.
The provisions for income taxes for the years ended December 31, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Current: |
|||||||
Federal |
$ | 342 | $ | 121 | |||
State |
60 | 37 | |||||
$ | 402 | $ | 158 | ||||
Deferred expense(benefit) |
|||||||
Federal |
$ | (52 | ) | $ | 32 | ||
State |
(9 | ) | 5 | ||||
(61 | ) | 37 | |||||
Income Tax expense |
$ | 341 | $ | 195 | |||
Following is a reconciliation of income taxes at federal statutory rates to recorded income taxes for the year ended December 31:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||
Tax at Federal tax rate |
$ | 447 | 34.0 | % | $ | 258 | 34.0 | % | ||||||
Tax effect of: |
||||||||||||||
State income tax |
40 | 3.0 | % | 24 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||
Tax exempt earnings |
(147 | ) | -11.2 | % | (86 | ) | -11.3 | % | ||||||
Other |
1 | 0.1 | % | (1 | ) | -0.1 | % | |||||||
$ | 341 | 25.9 | % | $ | 195 | 25.8 | % | |||||||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the result of timing differences in recognition of revenue and expense for income tax and financial statement purposes.
Deferred income tax liabilities and (assets) were comprised of the following at December 31:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 176 | $ | 183 | ||||
Pension |
18 | 10 | ||||||
Gross deferred tax liabilities |
194 | 193 | ||||||
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
(151 | ) | (275 | ) | ||||
Allowance for loan loss |
(415 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||
Minimum pension liability |
(97 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Gross deferred tax (assets) |
(663 | ) | (575 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax (asset) |
$ | (469 | ) | $ | (382 | ) | ||
No deferred income tax valuation allowance is provided since it is more likely than not that realization of the deferred income tax asset will occur in future years.
38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
NOTE 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has granted loans to officers and directors of the Company and to their associates. Related party loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties and do not involve more than normal risk of collectibility. Set forth below is a summary of the related loan activity.
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance at Beginning of Year |
Borrowings | Repayments | Balance at end of Year | |||||||||
December 31, 2006 |
$ | 3,941 | $ | 3,674 | $ | (733 | ) | $ | 6,882 | ||||
December 31, 2005 |
$ | 5,141 | $ | 1,625 | $ | (2,825 | ) | $ | 3,941 | ||||
The Company held related party deposits of $4,483 and $6,884 at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The Company held related party repurchase agreements of $1,890 and $2,151 at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
NOTE 10. PENSION PLAN
The Company participates in a trusteed pension plan known as the West Virginia Bankers Association Retirement Plan covering virtually all full-time employees. Benefits are based on years of service and the employees compensation. The Companys funding policy is to fund normal costs of the plan as accrued. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date, but also for those benefits expected to be earned in the future. The Company participated in the pension plan beginning January 1, 1999. The Company has recognized estimated pension expense of $139 and $112 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Information pertaining to the activity in the Companys defined benefit plan, using the latest available actuarial valuations with a measurement date of October 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Change in benefit obligation |
||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 661 | $ | 411 | ||||
Service cost |
122 | 100 | ||||||
Interest cost |
40 | 31 | ||||||
Actuarial loss |
13 | 119 | ||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
$ | 836 | $ | 661 | ||||
Change in plan assets: |
||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
$ | 455 | $ | 310 | ||||
Actual return on plan assets |
59 | 20 | ||||||
Employer contribution |
150 | 125 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
| | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
$ | 664 | $ | 455 | ||||
Funded status |
$ | (172 | ) | $ | (205 | ) | ||
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
226 | 247 | ||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
17 | 19 | ||||||
Prepaid pension cost recognized |
$ | 71 | $ | 61 | ||||
Accumulated benefit obligation |
$ | 682 | $ | 533 | ||||
39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation are as follows:
Discount rate |
6.00 | % | 5.75 | % | ||
Rate of compensation increase |
3.00 | % | 3.00 | % |
The components of net periodic pension cost are as follows:
Service cost |
$ | 122 | $ | 100 | ||||
Interest cost |
40 | 31 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(42 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Amortization of prior service costs |
3 | 2 | ||||||
Amortization of loss |
16 | 10 | ||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 139 | $ | 112 | ||||
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost are as follows:
Discount rate |
5.75 | % | 6.50 | % | ||
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |
8.50 | % | 8.50 | % | ||
Rate of compensation increase |
3.00 | % | 3.50 | % |
The Companys pension plan asset allocations at October 31, 2006 and 2005, as well as target allocations for 2007 are as follows:
Asset Category |
2007 Target | 10/31/2006 | 10/31/2005 | ||||||
Equity securities |
75 | % | 74 | % | 73 | % | |||
Balanced fund |
25 | % | 20 | % | 22 | % | |||
Other |
0 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | |||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The net transition obligation (asset), prior service cost (credit), and estimated net loss (gain) for the plan that are expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are shown in the table below.
2007 | 2006 | |||||
Expected amortization of transition obligation (asset) |
$ | | $ | | ||
Expected amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
2 | 2 | ||||
Expected amortization of net loss (gain) |
12 | 16 |
Below we show the best estimate of the plan contribution for next fiscal year. We also show the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregrate for the five fiscal years thereafter.
Cash Flow | |||
Contributions for the period of 1/1/2007 through 12/31/2007 |
$ | 152,885 | |
Estimated future benefit payments reflecting expected future service |
|||
1/1/2007 through 12/31/2007 |
$ | 7,443 | |
1/1/2008 through 12/31/2008 |
13,971 | ||
1/1/2009 through 12/31/2009 |
29,798 | ||
1/1/2010 through 12/31/2010 |
34,605 | ||
1/1/2011 through 12/31/2011 |
37,607 | ||
1/1/2012 through 12/31/2016 |
265,189 |
NOTE 11. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
On October 7, 2005, the Company purchased a full service office in the Charles Town area of Jefferson County West Virginia. This office held assets of $1.8 million and total deposits of $17.1 million. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded intangible assets. As of December 31, 2006 the Company has allocated $99 to core deposit intangibles, which are being amortized using the double-declining balance method over 10 years. The remaining $896 has been recorded as goodwill, and is evaluated for impairment on October 1st each year by the Company.
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
NOTE 12. STOCK OFFERING
During 2006 the Company completed a public stock offering of 725,000 shares of common stock, which increased capital by more than $11 million. This offering was done to support expansion into bordering Harrison County and the growing Jefferson County area in West Virginias eastern panhandle.
NOTE 13. STOCK OPTIONS
The MVB Financial Corp. Incentive Stock Plan provides for the issuance of stock options to selected employees. Under the provisions of the plan, the option price per share shall not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. All options granted prior to 2004 vest in 4 years, and expire 10 years from the date of grant. For options granted in 2004 and 2005 the vesting period has been accelerated to fully vest at December 31, 2005. These options also expire 10 years from the date of the grant. Options granted in 2006 vest in 5 years and expire 10 years from the date of the grant
The following summarizes MVBs stock options as of December 31, and the changes for the year then ended:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Number Shares |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Number Shares |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
175,312 | $ | 14.63 | 40,829 | $ | 10.12 | ||||
Granted |
2,500 | 16.00 | 134,483 | 16.00 | ||||||
Adjust for 5% stock dividend |
| $ | | | $ | | ||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||
Forfeited/expired |
1,000 | | | | ||||||
Outstanding at end of year |
176,812 | $ | 14.64 | 175,312 | $ | 14.63 | ||||
Exercisable at end of year |
174,312 | $ | 14.63 | 175,312 | $ | 14.63 | ||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year |
$ | 6.37 | $ | 5.45 | ||||||
The fair value for the options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with an average risk-free interest rate of 4.62% and 4.25% for 2006 and 2005, respectively, and a weighted-average expected life of the options of 7 years for 2006 and 2005. The expected volatility of MVBs stock price used for 2006 options was 12.5% and the expected dividend yield used was .625%. No volatility or expected dividends were used to estimate the fair value of MVBs stock in 2005.
The following summarizes information concerning MVBs stock options outstanding at December 31, 2006:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||
Exercise Price | Options Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
$ 9.98 | 37,154 | 4.00 | $ | 9.98 | 37,154 | $ | 9.98 | |||||
$10.48 | 1,575 | 5.00 | $ | 10.48 | 1,575 | $ | 10.48 | |||||
$12.38 | 2,100 | 8.00 | $ | 12.38 | 2,100 | $ | 12.38 | |||||
$16.00 | 135,983 | 9.00 | $ | 16.00 | 133,483 | $ | 16.00 |
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
NOTE 14. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Banks assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier I capital to average assets, as defined. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
The most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. Both the Companys and the Banks actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table below.
ACTUAL | MINIMUM TO BE WELL |
MINIMUM FOR CAPITAL |
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | AMOUNT | RATIO | AMOUNT | RATIO | AMOUNT | RATIO | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 22,972 | 15.9 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 11,545 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
Subsidiary Bank |
$ | 21,926 | 15.2 | % | $ | 14,419 | 10.0 | % | $ | 11,535 | 8.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 21,766 | 15.1 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 5,772 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Subsidiary Bank |
$ | 20,720 | 14.4 | % | $ | 8,651 | 6.0 | % | $ | 5,767 | 4.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital (to average assets) |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 21,766 | 11.9 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 7,307 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Subsidiary Bank |
$ | 20,720 | 11.4 | % | $ | 9,127 | 5.0 | % | $ | 7,302 | 4.0 | % | ||||||
As of December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 19,391 | 17.6 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 8,850 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
Subsidiary Bank |
$ | 18,126 | 16.5 | % | $ | 11,017 | 10.0 | % | $ | 8,814 | 8.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 18,518 | 16.8 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 4,425 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Subsidiary Bank |
$ | 17,253 | 15.7 | % | $ | 6,610 | 6.0 | % | $ | 4,407 | 4.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital (to average assets) |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 18,518 | 12.7 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 5,856 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Subsidiary Bank |
$ | 17,253 | 11.8 | % | $ | 7,297 | 5.0 | % | $ | 5,838 | 4.0 | % |
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
NOTE 15. REGULATORY RESTRICTION ON DIVIDEND
The approval of the regulatory agencies is required if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds the Banks net profits, as defined, for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceeding two calendar years.
NOTE 16. LEASES
The Company leases land and building space for the operation of some banking offices. All such leases qualify as operating leases. Following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2006:
Years ended December 31: |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||
2007 |
$ | 54 | |
2008 |
54 | ||
2009 |
55 | ||
2010 |
55 | ||
2011 |
55 | ||
Thereafter |
485 | ||
Total minimum payments required: |
$ | 758 |
Total lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $54 and $53, respectively.
NOTE 17. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following summarizes the methods and significant assumptions used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.
Short-term financial instruments: The carrying values of short-term financial instruments including cash and due from banks, interest bearing balances - FHLB, and certificates of deposit in other banks approximate the fair value of these instruments.
Securities: Estimated fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities.
Loans: The estimated fair values for loans are computed based on scheduled future cash flows of principal and interest, discounted at interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms of borrowers of similar credit quality. No prepayments of principal are assumed.
Accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying values of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate their estimated fair values.
Repurchase agreements: The fair values of repurchase agreements approximate their estimated fair values.
Deposits: The estimated fair values of demand deposits (i.e, non interest bearing checking, NOW and money market), savings accounts and other variable rate deposits approximate their carrying values. Fair values of fixed maturity deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology at rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities. Any intangible value of long-term relationships with depositors is not considered in estimating the fair values disclosed.
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
Off-balance sheet instruments: The fair values of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of agreements and the present credit standing of the counterparties. The amounts of fees currently charged on commitments and standby letters of credit are deemed insignificant, and therefore, the estimated fair values and carrying values are not shown.
The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are summarized as follows:
December 31, 2006 | ||||||
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 6,417 | $ | 6,417 | ||
Interest bearing balances - FHLB |
53 | 53 | ||||
Certificates of deposit in other banks |
| | ||||
Securities available-for-sale |
26,413 | 26,413 | ||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
2,326 | 2,316 | ||||
Loans |
142,599 | 139,747 | ||||
Accrued interest receivable |
844 | 844 | ||||
$ | 178,652 | $ | 175,790 | |||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||
Deposits |
$ | 134,593 | $ | 134,272 | ||
Repurchase agreements |
20,209 | 20,209 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings |
13,790 | 13,859 | ||||
Accrued interest payable |
405 | 405 | ||||
$ | 168,997 | $ | 168,745 | |||
December 31, 2005 | ||||||
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value | |||||
Financial assets: |
||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 3,130 | $ | 3,130 | ||
Interest bearing balances - FHLB |
2,723 | 2,723 | ||||
Certificates of deposit in other banks |
891 | 891 | ||||
Securities available-for-sale |
24,926 | 24,926 | ||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
3,608 | 3,591 | ||||
Loans |
105,214 | 105,740 | ||||
Accrued interest receivable |
659 | 659 | ||||
$ | 141,151 | $ | 141,660 | |||
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
Financial liabilities: |
||||||
Deposits |
$ | 113,953 | $ | 113,346 | ||
Repurchase agreements |
15,309 | 15,309 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings |
3,002 | 3,002 | ||||
Accrued interest payable |
294 | 294 | ||||
$ | 132,558 | $ | 131,951 | |||
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Companys entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Companys financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Fair value estimates are based on existing on-and-off balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.
NOTE 18. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY
The investment of the Company in its second tier subsidiaries is presented on the equity method of accounting. Information relative to the parent companys balance sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of income and cash flows for each of those years are presented below:
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
Balance Sheets |
December 31 | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 110 | $ | 445 | ||||
Investment in bank subsidiary, eliminated in consolidation |
21,541 | 18,068 | ||||||
Other assets |
4 | 5 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 21,655 | $ | 18,518 | ||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity | ||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Other liabilities |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Total liabilities |
| | ||||||
Stockholders equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $1,000; 5,000 shares authorized, none issued |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Common stock, par value $1; 4,000,000 shares authorized; 1,467,849 and 1,336,517 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
1,468 | 1,336 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
17,720 | 15,750 | ||||||
Treasury stock |
(18 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
2,858 | 1,885 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(373 | ) | (443 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
21,655 | 18,518 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 21,655 | $ | 18,518 | ||||
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MVB FINANCIAL CORP.
December 31, 2006
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Statements of Income |
|||||||
Income - dividends from bank subsidiary |
$ | | $ | 100 | |||
Expenses - operating |
30 | 29 | |||||
Income/(Loss) before income taxes and undistributed income |
(30 | ) | 71 | ||||
Equity in Statements of Cash Flows undistributed income of bank subsidiary |
1,003 | 491 | |||||
Net income |
$ | 973 | $ | 562 | |||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Statements of Cash Flows |
||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 973 | $ | 562 | ||||
Equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiary |
(1,003 | ) | (491 | ) | ||||
Decrease in other assets |
1 | 15 | ||||||
(Decrease) in other liabilities |
| (9 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities |
(29 | ) | 77 | |||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds of stock offering |
2,102 | 9,369 | ||||||
Investment in subsidiary |
(2,400 | ) | (9,000 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(8 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities |
(306 | ) | 368 | |||||
(Decrease)/increase in cash |
(335 | ) | 445 | |||||
Cash at beginning of period |
445 | | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 110 | $ | 445 | ||||
46
(Brown Edwards & Company, L.L.P. letterhead)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of
MVB Financial Corp.
Fairmont, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MVB Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all materials respects, the consolidated financial position of MVB Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Brown, Edwards & Company, L. L. P |
Bluefield, West Virginia
February 13,2007
47
ITEM 8. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
The Audit Committee and Board of Directors approved dismissing the current MVB independent certifying accountants, Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. (BE), Bluefield, WV, upon completion of the examination of MVBs 2006 financial statements. BE was informed of this change on January 8, 2007. Brown Edwards also reviewed the MVB 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB prior to its filing. The dismissal is totally related to the proposed cost for the examination of the 2007 MVB financial statements.
Brown Edwards has examined the financial statements for 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. For 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the financial statements of MVB contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.
The recommendation to change accountants was approved by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors of MVB.
There were no disagreements with Brown Edwards on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures.
MVB filed a Form 8-K/A on January 8, 2007 regarding a change in accountants. We requested a letter from the dismissed accountants asking that they furnish a letter to the Commission as to whether or not they agreed with the statements made by MVB. Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. furnished a letter addressed to the Commission stating that they agreed with MVBs statements. A copy of the letter dated January 16, 2007, was filed as Exhibit 16 to the Form 8-K/A.
The Audit Committee and Board of Directors of MVB have elected to engage new accountants to audit MVBs financial statements for 2007. S.R. Snodgrass, A.C., Certified Public Accountants and Consultants (Snodgrass), Wheeling, WV as the new accounting firm to audit the financial statements for MVB for 2007. Based on the proposal received from Snodgrass, it is expected that they will also audit the financial statements of MVB for 2008 and 2009.
MVB did not discuss the application of accounting principles to a specific completed or contemplated transaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on MVBs financial statements and neither written or oral advice was provided that was an important factor considered by MVB in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.
ITEM 8A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The companys management, with the participation of the companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006. Based on that evaluation, the companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2006.
There were no significant changes in the companys internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2006.
ITEM 8B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
48
ITEM 9. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. |
Directors and Executive Officers of MVB include those persons identified under Management Nominees to the Board of MVB on pages 2-4 of MVBs definitive Proxy Statement relating to MVBs Annual Meeting of Shareholders for 2007. For discussion of the audit committee financial expert of MVB, see Committees of the Board, on page 5 of MVBs definitive proxy statement relating to MVBs Annual Meeting of Shareholders for 2007, which is expressly incorporated by reference.
ITEM 10. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
See Executive Compensation on page 8 of MVBs definitive Proxy Statement relating to MVBs Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2007.
MVB has adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers and shall be deemed incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
See Principal Holders of Voting Securities on page 11 of MVBs definitive Proxy Statement relating to MVBs Annual Meeting of Shareholders for 2007 which section is expressly incorporated by reference. For equity compensation plan information, please see table below.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category |
Number of securities of (a) |
Weighted-average (b) |
Number of securities (c) | ||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
174,312 | $ | 14.63 | 11,796 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||
Total |
174,312 | $ | 14.63 | 11,796 |
ITEM 12. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
MVB and the Bank have, and expect to continue to have, banking and other transactions in the ordinary course of business with its directors and officers and their affiliates, including members of their families or corporations, partnerships or other organizations in which officers or directors have a controlling interest, on substantially the same terms (including documentation, price, interest rates and collateral, repayment and amortization schedules and default provisions) as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties. All of these transactions were made on substantially the same terms (including interest rates, collateral and repayment terms on loans) as comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons. MVBs management believes that these transactions did not involve more than the normal business risk of collection or include any unfavorable features.
During 2005, Director Mossallati constructed the Bridgeport Banking Office for MVB. He was selected after solicitation of comparative estimates and notification to the WV Division of Banking and the
49
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Upon completion, the facility was appraised by an independent appraiser at $1.6 million, which is more than the total cost of the project. The transactions with Director Mossallati were on terms and conditions which were at least as favorable to MVB as those available from unrelated third parties.
Total loans outstanding from the Bank at December 31, 2006 to MVB and Bank officers and directors as a group and members of their immediate families and companies in which they had an ownership interest of 10% or more was $5.6 million or 26.1% of total equity capital and 3.96% of total loans. These loans do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
ITEM 13. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are attached hereto. For a list of such exhibits, see Exhibit Index beginning at page 52. The Exhibit Index specifically identifies each management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-KSB.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
See Ratification of Auditors on page 11 and 12 of MVBs definitive Proxy Statement relating to MVBs Annual Meeting of Shareholders for 2007.
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
MVB Financial Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Exhibit Location | ||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
3.1-1 | Articles of Incorporation - Amendment |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
3.2 | Bylaws |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
10.1 | MVB Financial Corp. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
10.2 | Master Lease Agreement with S-N-S Foods, Inc. for premises occupied by Middletown Mall Office |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
10.3 | Sublease Agreement with S-N-S Foods, Inc. for premises occupied by Middletown Mall Office |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
10.4 | Lease Agreement with Essex Properties, LLC for land occupied by Bridgeport Branch |
Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-120931, filed December 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein | ||
11 | Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings per Share |
Footnotes to Financial Statements Note 1 Net Income per Common Share |
51
14 | Code of Ethics |
Filed herewith | ||
21 | Subsidiary of Registrant |
Filed herewith | ||
24 | Power of Attorney |
Filed herewith | ||
31.1 | Certificate of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith | ||
31.2 | Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith | ||
32.1 | Certificate of Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith | ||
99.1 | Report of Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P., Independent Auditors |
Found on Page 48 herein |
52
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
March 27, 2007
MVB FINANCIAL CORP. | ||
By: | /S/ JAMES R. MARTIN | |
James R. Martin President and Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Officer) | ||
By: | /S/ ERIC L. TICHENOR | |
Eric L. Tichenor Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
53